alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# M A N D A T E

******************************************** *

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF CHEROKEE C OUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 1 3th
day of May, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

THE STATE OF TEXAS F OR THE

BEST INTEREST AND PR OTECTION OF D. T.

NO. 12

- 15

- 00085

- CV; Trial Court No. 41,258

By per curiam opinion.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to di smiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by

this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHER EAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 9 th day of Jul y, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of AXCESS International Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 201, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, Allan Griebenow, President,Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

 
| /S/ ALLAN GRIEBENOW                                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Allan Griebenow                                                     |   |
| President, Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer |   |

 

Dated:  May 13, 2010

 

----
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) was amended, effective September 1

1, 2007, to require that a defendant sign the certification and receive a copy.

NO. 07-07-0401-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 11, 2008

______________________________

RICKY MORRISON, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 137 DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; TH

NO. 2007-417,356; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Following a plea of not guilty, appellant Ricky Morrison was convicted by jury of

aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to fifty years confinement. Appellant timely filed

a notice of appeal challenging his conviction. The clerk’s record filed on January 9, 2008

contains the Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal. The form, however,

is not signed by appellant as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d).1
2

Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to

secure a Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). Once properly executed, the certification shall be included

in a supplemental clerk’s record and filed with this Court on or before February 11, 2008.

It is so ordered. 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0363

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH EDWARDS KNOWLES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including June 17, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 8 2024

05/08/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0363
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, Tra Special Programs Unit, petitioner, v. Dawn GERSTENSCHLAGER.

No. 12-379, R46-017.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 4, 2013.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
RBS CITIZENS, N.A., dba Charter One, et al., petitioners, v. Synthia G. ROSS, et al.

No. 12-165.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Comcast Corp. v. Behrend,* --- U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1426, --- L.Ed. ---- (2013).
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.3


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Avis Group Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), F.
Robert Salerno, as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and
Kurt Freudenberg, as Senior Vice President and Controller, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

             (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ F. Robert Salerno
--------------------------------------
F. Robert Salerno
President and Chief Operating Officer
March 6, 2003

/s/ Kurt Freudenberg
--------------------------------------
Kurt Freudenberg
Senior Vice President and Controller
March 6, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 1 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67 Filed10/17/13 Page1 of 3
Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67 Filed10/17/13 Page2 of 3

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 2 of 10
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 3 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67 Filed10/17/13 Page3 of 3
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 4 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67-1 Filed10/17/13 Page1 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 5 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67-1 Filed10/17/13 Page2 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 6 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67-1 Filed10/17/13 Page3 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 7 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67-1 Filed10/17/13 Page4 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 8 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67-1 Filed10/17/13 Page5 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 9 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67-1 Filed10/17/13 Page6 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 68 Filed 10/18/13 Page 10 of 10 Case3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document67-1 Filed10/17/13 Page7 of 7
ຄວາມປອດໄພດ້ານອາຫານ

ຂອງຄົວເຮືອນ

1. ເຮັດຄວາມສະອາດ

ທໍາ ຄວາມສະອາດສ່ວນປະກອບ ສໍາ ລັບອາຫານແລະລ້າງມືໃສ່ບໍລິເວນນັ້ນ. ແລະເຄື່ອງມື ສໍາ 

ລັບແຕ່ງກິນ

• ລ້າງມືຂອງທ່ານດ້ວຍນ້ໍາອຸ່ນແລະສະບູຢ່າງຫນ້ອຍ 20 ວິນາທີ, ທັງກ່ອນແລະຫຼັງຈັດການອາຫານ.

• ເຮັດຄວາມສະອາດແຜງຕັດ, ຝຶກແຜ່ນ, ບ່ວງ, ມີດແລະພື້ນທີ່ປຸງແຕ່ງອາຫານດ້ວຍນ້ໍາສະບູຮ້ອນ ໂດຍການລ້າງກ່ອນ

ເລີ່ມໃຊ້ເຄື່ອງໃຊ້ໃນການປຸງແຕ່ງອາຫານ.

• ລ້າງຫມາກໄມ້ແລະຜັກໂດຍລ້າງອອກພາຍໃຕ້ນ້ໍາທີ່ກໍາລັງແລ່ນ

• ຢ່າ ລ້າງຊີ້ນ, ສັດປີກ, ປາ ຫຼື ໄຂ່. ຖ້າຫາກວ່ານ້ໍາກະເດັນຈາກ ອ່າງນໍ້າໃນຂະບວນການລ້າງ, ມັນສາມາດແຜ່ເຊື້ອແບັກທີ

ເຣັຍໄດ້.

• ເຮັດຄວາມສະອາດຝາປິດຂອງກ່ອນທີ່ຈະເປີດ.

2. ການເກັບຮັກສາແຍກເປັນສັດສ່ວນ

ແຍກສ່ວນປະກອບຂອງອາຫານສົດ ນີ້ແມ່ນຍ້ອນວ່າເຊື້ອພະຍາດສາມາດແຜ່ລາມຈາກ

ອາຫານຫນຶ່ງໄປຫາອາຫານອື່ນ. 

• ເກັບຮັກສາຊີ້ນ, ສັດປີກ, ອາຫານທະເລແລະໄຂ່ແຍກຕ່າງຫາກຈາກອາຫານອື່ນໆໂດຍການແຍກບ່ອນເກັບມ້ຽນດັ່ງກ່າວ

ຈາກການວາງອາຫານໃສ່ກະຕ່າ ສໍາລັບຊື້ເຄື່ອງໃນກະເປົາແລະເກັບມ້ຽນໄວ້ໃນຕູ້ເຢັນe.

• ຢ່າໃຊ້ນໍ້າຫມັກ ທີ່ທ່ານໃຊ້ໃນອາຫານສົດ ເວັ້ນເສຍແຕ່ວ່າທ່ານເອົາມັນໄປຕົ້ມຕໍ່ມາ.

• ໃຊ້ກະດານຕັດໂດຍສະເພາະໃນການກະຕຽມອາຫານສົດ

3. ການປຸງແຕ່ງອາຫານ

ອາຫານຕ້ອງຮ້ອນແລະສາມາດຮັກສາຄວາມຮ້ອນໄດ້. ເພາະວ່າຄວາມຮ້ອນສາມາດຂ້າເຊື້ອ

ພະຍາດໄດ້ .

• ຄວນປຸງແຕ່ງອາຫານໃນອຸນຫະພູມທີ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ

‐ ເຊິ່ງປອດໄພສໍາລັບອາຫານແຕ່ລະປະເພດ ຊີ້ນງົວ, 

 ຊີ້ນຫມູ, ຊີ້ນແກະທີ່ອຸນຫະພູມ 145 ອົງສາຟາເຣນຮາຍ

‐ ປາໃນອຸນຫະພູມ 145 ອົງສາຟາເຣນຮາຍ

‐ ຊີ້ນງົວຊີ້ນຄວາຍ, ຊີ້ນຫມູ, ລູກຊີ້ນດິນໃນອຸນຫະພູມ 160 ອົງສາຟາເຣນຮາຍ 

‐ ໄກ່ງວງ, ໄກ່, ເປັດໃຊ້ອຸນຫະພູມ 165 ອົງສາຟາເຣນຮາຍ

• ໃຊ້ເຄື່ອງອຸນຫະພູມສໍາລັບອາຫານເພື່ອຮັບປະກັນ

ວ່າອາຫານສຸກແທ້ທ່ານບໍ່ສາມາດປະເມີນຄວາມ

ສຸກຂອງອາຫານໄດ້ໂດຍຕາໄດ້ຖືກຕ້ອງສະ ເຫມີໄປ

4. ການເກັບອາຫານໄວ້ໃນຕູ້ເຢັນ

ເອົາອາຫານໃສ່ຕູ້ເຢັນທັນທີ

• ໃຊ້ກົດ 2 ຊົ່ວໂມງ: ຮັກສາອາຫານໄວ້ໃນຕູ້ເຢັນພາຍໃນ

2 ຊົ່ວໂມງຫລັງຈາກເຮັດແລ້ວຫລືຫລັງຈາກຊື້ຈາກຮ້ານ 

ຖ້າອຸນຫະພູມພາຍນອກສູງກວ່າຫຼືເທົ່າກັບ 90 ອົງສາ, 

ແຊ່ອາຫານພາຍໃນ 1 ຊົ່ວໂມງ.

• ຢ່າທໍາລາຍອາຫານໂດຍເອົາມັນອອກຈາກຕູ້ເຢັນ

ທັນທີ. ອາຫານຄວນຈະຖືກລະລາຍໂດຍໃຊ້ວິທີ

ຕໍ່ໄປນີ້;

 

 

‐ ລະລາຍໃນຕູ້ເຢັນ

‐ ລະລາຍໃນນ້ ໍາ ເຢັນ

‐ ລະລາຍໃນໄມໂຄເວຟ

• ຫມັກອາຫານໄວ້ໃນຕູ້ເຢັນ.
ເປັນຫຍັງເຈົ້າຄວນໃສ່ໃຈຄວາມປອດໄພຂອງອາຫານ?

ໃນແຕ່ລະປີ, ປະຊາຊົນຫຼາຍລ້ານຄົນມີອາການພະຍາດທີ່ເກີດຈາກອາຫານ ພະຍາດທາງອາຫານສາມາດເຮັດໃຫ້ທ່ານຮູ້ສຶກເປັນໄຂ້ຫວັດໃຫຍ່ ພະຍາດທີ່ເກີດ

ຈາກອາຫານກໍ່ອາດຈະເຮັດໃຫ້ເກີດບັນຫາສຸຂະພາບຮ້າຍແຮງ ຫລືເປັນສາເຫດຂອງຄວາມຕາຍໄດ້.

ຖ້າທ່ານຄິດວ່າທ່ານກໍາລັງມີອາການຂອງພະຍາດທີເກີດຈາກ

ອາຫານ?

ກະລຸນາໂທຫາທ່ານຫມໍຂອງທ່ານເພື່ອການປິ່ນປົວດ່ວນ

• ຮັກສາເຄື່ອງຫຸ້ມຫໍ່, ກະປອງຫລືອາຫານໃສ່ໃນປ່ອງ

• ໂທຫາ USD A ທີ່ 1‐888‐674‐6854. ສໍາລັບຊີ້ນ,ສັດປີກແລະໄຂ່

• ໃຫ້ໂທຫາ FDA ທີ່ 1-866‐300‐4374. ສໍາລັບອາຫານປະເພດອື່ນໆ

• ໂທຫາສູນການແພດທ້ອງຖິ່ນຂອງທ່ານ ຖ້າທ່ານຄິດວ່າທ່ານເຈັບປ່ວຍຈາກການກິນຢູ່ຮ້ານອາຫານຫລືຜູ້ຈາກຂາຍອາຫານອື່ນໆ .

ໃຜມີຄວາມສ່ຽງ?

ທຸກໆຄົນມີຄວາມສ່ຽງທີ່ຈະເຈັບປ່ວຍຈາກການກິນອາຫານທີ່ເສີຍໂດຍສະເພາະໃນບາງຄົນທີ່ມີຄວາມສ່ຽງສູງທີ່ຈະເຈັບປ່ວຍຈາກການກິນອາຫານ ເຊັ່ນວ່າ.

• ແມ່ຍິງຖືພາ 

• ປະຊາຊົນຜູ້ສູງອາຍຸ

• ຜູ້ທີ່ມີບັນຫາສຸຂະພາບບາງຢ່າງເຊັ່ນ: ມະເລັງ, ໂລກເອດ / ໂລກເອດ, ໂລກເບົາຫວານແລະພະຍາດຫມາກໄຂ່ຫຼັງ

ອາຫານບາງຊະນິດອາດຈະມີຄວາມສ່ຽງຫຼາຍຕໍ່ຄົນເຫຼົ່ານີ້ ກະລຸນາປຶກສາກັບທ່ານຫມໍຫລືຜູ້ໃຫ້ບໍລິການດ້ານສຸຂະພາບກ່ຽວກັບປະເພດອາຫານທີ່ທ່ານ

ສາມາດກິນໄດ້ຢ່າງປອດໄພ.

 ເອກະສານນີ້ໄດ້ຖືກພັດທະນາໂດຍຫ້ອງການສຸຂະພາບແມ່ຍິງຂອງFDA

ສໍາລັບຂໍ້ມູນເພີ່ມເຕີມກ່ຽວກັບສຸຂະພາບຂອງແມ່ຍິງ, ກະລຸນາຢ້ຽມຊົມ (ຫ້ອງການສາທາລະນະສຸກຂອງແມ່ຍິງ FDA)

www.fda.gov/womens

ຄວາມປອດໄພດ້ານອາຫານຂອງຄົວເຮືອນ (LAOTIAN)

ຄວາມປອດໄພດ້ານອາຫານຂອງຄົວເຮືອນ

2021
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 21488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10703]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[MN29-1-6203b; FRL-5174-8]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Minnesota

AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: USEPA proposes to approve updated air permitting regulations 
that Minnesota submitted on November 23, 1993. USEPA further proposes 
to authorize Minnesota to issue federally enforceable State operating 
permits (FESOPs) under these regulations, and submit properly noticed 
permits as SIP revision requests. In addition, USEPA proposes to find 
that the updated regulations continue to satisfy new source review 
permitting requirements.
    In the final rules section of this Federal Register, the USEPA is 
approving Minnesota's updated permitting regulations as a direct final 
rule without prior proposal, because USEPA views the action as 
noncontroversial and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed 
rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no 
adverse comments are received in response to that direct final rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to the proposal of that 
action. If USEPA receives adverse public comments, the direct final 
rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. USEPA 
will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this action must be received by June 1, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to: William L. 
MacDowell, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Enforcement 
Branch (AE-17J), United States Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Summerhays, Air Enforcement 
Branch, Regulation Development Section (AE-17J), United States 
Environmental Protection, Region 5, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-
6067.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information is provided in the 
rules section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: March 8, 1995.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-10703 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Jesus Natividad SANTOS-SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8325.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from National
Property Investors 6 2000 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                               0000708870
<NAME>                              National Property Investors 6
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   425
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            917
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                71,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (48,708)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        24,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                               26,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                            (2,578)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          24,521
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       5,722
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       5,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      234
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             234
<EPS-BASIC>                                             2.12 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
U.S. Food & Drug Administration

10903 New Hampshire Ave 

Silver Spring, MD 20993

www.fda.gov

March 4, 2022

Dear Colleagues:

The volume of imported FDA regulated commodities continues to increase, driven in part by e-Commerce,

trade volume and supply chain complexities which require ORA to assess our approach to import entry review.

The Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Regulatory Affairs’ Office of Enforcement and Import

Operations (OEIO) is looking atseveral new ways to increase efficiency and effectiveness in our operational

work. As part of this effort, OEIO has developed a 90-day pilot project to maximize our entry review staff at the

periods of highest volume drug entries.

The Nationalized Drug Entry Review Pilot will run from March 13, 2022 through June 13, 2022. We will

conduct entry admissibility reviews on a national basis versus the current port-by-port entry review approach.

The pilot, which is being managed by OEIO’s Division of Food Defense Targeting, will utilize entry review

staff over multiple time zones allowing us to expand our drug entry review coverage times to twenty-four-hour

coverage per day, with 7 days per week staffing. We will cover all 336 ports of entry and this expanded

coverage should allow for increased response time of drug entries. The pilot will also examine the potential to

automate portions of the entry reviewprocess, allowing entry reviewers to focusmore of their time on

potentially higher violation products.

During the period of the Nationalized Drug Entry Review Pilot, FDA would also like to determine if

efficiencies can be gained by receiving associated documentation at the time the entry is made rather than

waiting for regular Documents Requested communications.We are calling this, The More We Know, The Faster

You Go.

Our expectation is that the results and critical feedback from the pilot will provide OEIO with data to support

potential changes to our entry review process.

We are excited about the prospects of this pilot and look forward to communicating more information on our

results once the pilot has concluded.If you have any questions, please contact the new Nationalized Drug Entry

Review Pilot at ERPilot@fda.hhs.gov or by phone (toll free) 833-312-3237 or 301-796-2249.

Sincerely,

Dan R. Solis 

Assistant Commissioner forImport Operations
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41554

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS RIOS, JR., also known as Manuel

Rivera, also known as Francisco Galarza-Rios,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-02-CR-734-ALL

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Rios, Jr. appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after

deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rios

complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that

the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Rios thus contends
No. 02-41554

-2-

that his sentence should not exceed the maximum prescribed in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Rios acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11166]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE Docket No. 95-23-NG]


Trading & Transportation Management, Inc.; Order Granting Blanket 
Authorization to Import and Export Natural Gas From and to Canada and 
Mexico

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting Trading & Transportation 
Management, Inc. (TTMI) authorization to import up to 200 Bcf and to 
export up to 200 Bcf of natural gas from and to Canada, and to import 
up to 200 Bcf and to export up to 200 Bcf of natural gas from and to 
Mexico. The term of the authorization is for a period of two years, 
beginning on the date of first import or export delivery.
    TTMI's order is available for inspection and copying in the Office 
of Fuels Programs Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9478. The 
docket room is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., April 26, 1995.
Clifford P. Tomaszewski,
Director, Office of Natural Gas, Office of Fuels Programs, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 95-11166 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Kendall Corey Dustin BLYDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-1276

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.