alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.A





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Asia Special Situation Acquisition Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Geoffrey W. Holmes, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asia Special Situation Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by
Asia Special Situation Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Geoffrey W. HolmesGeoffrey
      W. HolmesChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)




April 1,
2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

United States of America, ) Case No. CR ead oa = 6c SS \W BA i
)
Plaintiff, ) STIPULATED ORDER EXC! TI
«. t ) UNDER THE SPEEDY a a = w)
)
C4 ) SEP 22
[haves Eplenne 4 a 2200
Defendant. ) CLERK, ene : a /

NORTHERN DISTRIL: -- CALIFORNIA
For the reasons stated by the parties on the record on 1 Ze Ze 2017, the Court excludes time
under the Speedy Trial Act from ___,2017 16 le l 2017 and finds that the
ends of justice served by the continudnce outweigh the best intérest of the public and the defendant in a
speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The Court makes this finding and bases this continuance on
the following factor(s):

Failure to grant a continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i).

The case is so unusual or so complex, due to [check applicable reasons] ____ the number of
defendants, the nature of the prosecution, or the existence of novel questions of fact
or law, that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or the trial
itself within the time limits established by this section. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).

Failure to grant a continuance would deny the defendant reasonable time to obtain counsel,
taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel, given
counsel’s other scheduled case commitments, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

b ( Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
JOSEPH C. SPERO

DATED: 4 : 2 2 ‘
Chief Magistrate Judge

STIPULATED: p (\ L ae a=

Attginty forlDefeidaht Assistant United States Attorney
1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE

Appellate case name: Jennifer Ann Larkins-Ruby v. Sealy Independent School 

District

Appellate case number: 01-18-00746-CV

Trial court case number: 2015V-0134

Trial court: 155th District Court of Austin County

Appellant, Jennifer Ann Larkins-Ruby, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial 

court’s judgment signed on August 14, 2018. A clerk’s record filed in this Court on 

October 22, 2018, includes appellant’s “Pauper’s Oath” filed in the trial court. See TEX.

R. CIV. P. 145(a), (b), (d). That clerk’s record does not include any motion to require 

appellant to pay costs or any trial court order requiring appellant to pay costs. See id. 

145(f).

Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this 

Court’s records that appellant is allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of 

costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (c); TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. 

The trial court clerk is directed to prepare and file, with this Court and at no cost to 

appellant, a clerk’s record, containing the items set out in Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 34.5(a) and not included in the clerk’s record filed on October 22, 2018. See

TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a), (c); TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(a), (b). The clerk’s record is due to be 

filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c).

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Russell Lloyd_______

 x Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: _November 6, 2018___
JOVANI FASHION, LIMITED, petitioner, v. FIESTA FASHIONS, et al.

No. 12-863.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981)

Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)

Joe Angelo (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Pl., 5th Floor 

San Jose, CA 95110

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 297-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COLBI TROESTER-MILLER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., et al,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00423-EMC

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, 

N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Colbi Troester-Miller and 

defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. be dismissed from this action 

with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that each party 

shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

//

//

//

//

//

Case 3:17-cv-00423-EMC Document 32 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: May 2, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot Gale

Elliot Gale

Attorney for Plaintiff Colbi Troester-Miller

DATED: May 2, 2017 Severson & Werson, APC

By: /s/ Alisa Alexandra Givental

Alisa Alexandra Givental

Attorney for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, 

N.A.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Alisa Alexandra Givental has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is dismissed with 

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Hon. Edward M. Chen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5/3/17

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:17-cv-00423-EMC Document 32 Filed 05/03/17 Page 2 of 2
STATE of Louisiana v. FINANCIAL CASUALTY AND SURETY

State of Louisiana v. Harold Allen

NO. 2019-K-0113

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 851 

Celebrating the 45th anniversary of the Senate Black Legislative Staff Caucus 

and its achievements in the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2022 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. BOOKER, and Mr. WARNOCK) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 45th anniversary of the Senate Black 

Legislative Staff Caucus and its achievements in the Senate. 

Whereas, in 1977, Jackie Parker and Ralph Everett had the 

vision and courage to improve the working conditions of 

Black Senate staffers; 

Whereas the Senate Black Legislative Staff Caucus continues 

to promote diversity and inclusion within the Senate; 

Whereas the Senate Black Legislative Staff Caucus recognizes each of the 11 current or former Senators of African-American descent; 

Whereas the Senate Black Legislative Staff Caucus celebrates 

and commemorates the dedicated efforts of its members 

to promote a more diverse and representative government; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 851 IS 

Whereas the Senate Black Legislative Staff Caucus continues 

to fight for the justice and equality that started during 

the civil rights movement of the 1960s: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the Senate Black 

2 Legislative Staff Caucus for its many contributions and 

3 commitment to enrich the Senate community. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUIFAX –- CHICOINE V PHEAA, NO. 3:17-CV-00926 JST

Page 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark F. Anderson (SBN 44787)

ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER LLP

1736 Stockton Street, Ground Floor

San Francisco, California 94133

Telephone: (415) 651-1951

Fax: (415) 500-8300

Email: mark@aoblawyers.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Heather L Chicoine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HEATHER L. CHICOINE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION 

ASSISTANCE AGENCY, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:17-cv-00926 JST

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT EQUIFAX 

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between counsel for plaintiff Heather L. 

Chicoine and counsel for defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (“Equifax”) that 

plaintiff Heather L. Chicoine’s claims against Equifax may shall be dismissed with prejudice, 

each party to bear its own fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 41(a)(2). 

Date: June 9, 2017 /s/ Mark F. Anderson

Mark F. Anderson, SBN 44787

Attorney for Plaintiff Heather L. Chicoine

Date: June 9, 2017 /s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr. (SBN 132268)

Nokes & Quinn APC

410 Broadway, Suite 200

Laguna Beach, CA 92651

Ph: 949.376.3500

tquinn@nokesquinn.com

Attorney for Equifax

Case 3:17-cv-00926-JST Document 35 Filed 06/09/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUIFAX –- CHICOINE V PHEAA, NO. 3:17-CV-00926 JST

Page 2 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FILER ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), I, Mark Anderson attest under penalty of perjury 

under the laws of the United States that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from each signatory.

Dated: June 9, 2017 /s/Mark F. Anderson

 Mark F. Anderson

Case 3:17-cv-00926-JST Document 35 Filed 06/09/17 Page 2 of 2
If you know you 

TAKE TIME TO CARE 

FOR YOURSELF ... FOR THOSE WHO NEED YOU 

- Read these carefully.

Adults often take care of medicines for 

the whole family as well as themselves. 

So we need to read the label, avoid 

problems, ask questions, and keep a 

record.

1. READ THE LABEL 

Before you take any medicine, read the 

label. The label should show:

List of ingredients -

are allergic to anything in the medicine, 

don’t use it. Ask your doctor or pharmacist

for a different medicine.

Warnings

Office of Women’s Health 

www.fda.gov/womens 

Tiempo Para Cuidar

Su Salud

 

2. AVOID PROBLEMS 

Medicines can cause proble

effects such as sleepiness, v

bleeding, headaches, or ras

the side effects of the medi

taking. Talk with your docto

or nurse.

Organize your medicines.

Do not skip taking your me

Do not share medicines.

Do not take medicine in the 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• Is it safe to drink alcohol with it? 

• If I forget to take it, what should I

 do? 

• How much should I take? 

• How long am I to take it? 

• What problems should I watch for? 

If you are pregnant or nursing a baby, seek 

the advice of a health professional before 

taking any medication or diet supplement. 

Talk with your doctor, pharmacist, or nurse. 

She/he will be happy to help you. 

List any allergies 

Doctor 

Phone number 

gy 

Antacids 

Cold medicine 

Cough medicine 

Diet pill/supplements 

Laxatives 

Sleeping pills 

Vitamins 

Minerals 

Herbals 

Others 

KEEP THIS IN YOUR PURSE OR POCKET AND SHOW IT TO YOUR DOCTOR, PH

NURSE. 

Have your doctor, pharmacist, or nurse report serious medication problems to the FDA at
frm10-ex401_usc.htm


    Exhibit
4.01

    


    incorporated
under the laws of the

    STATE OF
NEVADA

    


    


    Specimen
Stock Certificate

    


    


    


    


    ULTRA SUN
CORP.

    $.001 PAR
VALUE

    


    


    Please
see attached PDF document for an exact replica of stock
certificate.  There are 2 pages to the PDF
document.
Collins Stephanie WILSON, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA

No. 12-10039.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
Jonathan Lee SHAW, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7325.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 99
                                                                      ----------

           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
           ----------------------------------------------------------
                            FORM 10-QSB JUNE 30, 2001
                            -------------------------

Supplementary information required pursuant to section 9.4 of the partnership
agreement:

1. Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months ended
   June 30, 2001:

      Net Income                                            $     332,000
      Add:     Depreciation                                        50,000
      Less:    Cash to reserves                                  (274,000)
                                                            --------------
      Cash Available for Distribution                       $     108,000
                                                            ==============
      Distributions allocated to General Partners           $       8,000
                                                            ==============
      Distributions allocated to Limited Partners           $     100,000
                                                            ==============


2.  Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
    General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
    June 30, 2001:

         Entity Receiving                 Form of
           Compensation                 Compensation                Amount
     -------------------------   --------------------------     -------------

                                 Interest in Cash
     General Partners            Available for Distribution      $      8,000

     WFC Realty Co., Inc.        Interest in Cash
     (Initial Limited Partner)   Available for Distribution      $         20



















                                    13 of 13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

SANDRA RHODES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY INC. aka NEW ENGLAND 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN

JUDGE JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Please take notice that Knight S. Anderson of Tucker Ellis LLP hereby enters his 

appearance for Defendant Ameridose, LLC. Please note on the Docket and direct all future 

communications, pleadings, and court notices to the undersigned counsel. 

Dated this 21st day of February, 2013 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Knight S. Anderson 

Knight S. Anderson (17216-53) 

Tucker Ellis LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Tel: 216.592.5000 

Fax: 216.592.5009 

E-mail: knight.anderson@tuckerellis.com 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose LLC

 

case 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN document 23 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 2
2 

013260.000009/1592927.1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 21, 2013 using the ECF system that sent notification of this filing to all ECFregistered counsel of record via e-mail generated by the Court’s ECF system. 

 /s/Knight S. Anderson 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

case 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN document 23 filed 02/21/13 page 2 of 2
Jaime RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10197.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Mary T. NOWLING, petitioner, v. FLORIDA

No. 12-7802.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1274 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1274

         To suspend temporarily the duty on amyl-anthraquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2005

  Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on amyl-anthraquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMYL-ANTHRAQUINONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.22      9, 10-              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Anthracenedione                                                    31/2006
                         (CAS No. 13936-21-
                         5) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2914.69.90 in
                         pure form or
                         3824.90.28 in 50%
                         solution)........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICK R TUCKER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 17-cv-00642-YGR 

CASE MANAGEMENT AND 

PRETRIAL ORDER 

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates: 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: March 2, 2018 

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT REPORTS: 

ALL EXPERTS, RETAINED AND NON-RETAINED 

MUST PROVIDE WRITTEN REPORTS COMPLIANT 

WITH FRCP 26(A)(2)(B): 

Opening: March 16, 2018 

Rebuttal: March 30, 2018 

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: April 13, 2018 

 The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing 

Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All 

Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 6, 2017 

______________________________________ 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 

United States District Court Judge
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RUDY SIMENTAL, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NANCY ADAMS, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 17-cv-00801-SI (SI) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON 

SETTLEMENT 

 The parties to the action, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to 

a settlement. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

However, that if any party hereto certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on 

opposing counsel, within ninety days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, 

the foregoing order shall be vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for 

further proceedings. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

______________________________________ 

SUSAN ILLSTON 

United States District Judge 

5/8/18
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING

LITIGATION

 /

No. C 16-05674 WHA

No. C 16-05676 WHA

No. C 16-05679 WHA

No. C 16-05694 WHA

No. C 16-05701 WHA

No. C 16-05704 WHA

No. C 16-06315 WHA

No. C 16-06335 WHA

No. C 16-06363 WHA

No. C 16-06372 WHA

No. C 17-00342 WHA

No. C 17-00343 WHA

No. C 17-00395 WHA

No. C 17-00397 WHA

No. C 17-00506 WHA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-00397-WHA Document 15 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In ten of the above-captioned cases, a combined motion to dismiss is scheduled for

hearing on March 23. This particular action, Case v. Experian, No. 3:17-cv-00397-WHA, is not

a part of that combined motion. Defendants in this action, however, shall have until 28 DAYS

after the Court rules on the aforementioned combined motion to answer or otherwise respond to

the complaint. The pending stipulated request to extend the time for defendant Experian

Information Solutions, Inc., to respond to the complaint (Dkt. No. 10) is DENIED as inconsistent

with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00397-WHA Document 15 Filed 03/20/17 Page 2 of 2