alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

           WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES III, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                           FORM 10-QSB MARCH 31, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winthrop Residential
Associates III, A Limited Partnership, (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  May 15, 2003                                /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Michael L. Ashner
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 15, 2003                                /s/ Thomas C. Staples
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Thomas C. Staples
                                                   Chief Financial Officer





                                    19 of 19
骨质疏松症

什么是骨质疏松症?

骨质疏松症是一种导致骨骼非常脆弱且容

易折断的疾病。

谁有风险?

任何人都可以患有骨质疏松症,但是女性比

男性更容易患有骨质疏松症。 如果您满足

以下条件,您可能会有更高的风险:

• 50岁以上

• 吸烟

• 体重过轻

• 有家庭成员有骨质疏松或骨折

• 缺乏锻炼

• 饮酒(每天3杯以上)

• 长时间服用某些药物,例如癫痫或类固醇

药物

我如何判断自己是否患

有骨质疏松症?

有些测试使用X射线或声波来测量骨密度。 

这些测试是无痛的。 咨询您的医生判断您

是否应该接受检查。

• X射线检查(称为DXA扫描)检查您的脊椎,

臀部或手腕。 DXA扫描仅使用很少的X射

线波。

• 较新的声波测试(称为超声波),它可以测

试您的脚后跟。

如何治疗?

没有办法治愈骨质疏松症。 您可以采取一

些措施来减慢患病速度。 与您的医生商量

制定保持骨骼健康的计划。 

美国食品和药物管理局女性健康办公室 

www.fda.gov/womens
 此情况说明书是由食品和药物管理局女性健康办公室编写的。

 要获得其他关于女性健康资源,请访问

www.fda.gov/womens

2021

处方药

您可以服用处方药。这些药物以药丸、贴片

或注射剂的形式出现。在停止服药之前,请

告诉您的医生、护士或药剂师。

双膦酸盐是减慢骨质流失的常见药物。 您的

医生可能会为您提供其他药物。

• 与您的医生讨论您的服药时长。

• 如果您开始出现副作用,比如臀部或大腿

出现新的疼痛,请告诉医生。一些服用这些

药物的人会出现大腿骨折。

• 其中有些药物可能会刺激您的喉咙。

• 还可能导致严重的颌骨问题。

膳食补剂

膳食补剂是人们在饮食中添加的产品。 它们

包括维生素,粉末,能量棒和草药。

服用任何膳食补充剂之前,请先咨询您的医

生。 这些可能会影响您服用的其他药物,或

使您生病。

改变生活方式

您可以通过改变生活方式的方法来降低患

骨质疏松症的风险。

• 保持身体的活跃。做负重运动,比如走路。

• 不吸烟。

• 控制饮酒。

• 从饮食中摄取足够的钙和维生素D。您的医

生可能会建议您服用钙片和维生素片。

骨质疏松症

骨质疏松症 (CHINESE)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11299]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard
[CGD08-95-008]


Lower Mississippi River Waterway Safety Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lower Mississippi River Waterway Safety Advisory Committee 
will meet to discuss various navigation safety matters affecting the 
Lower Mississippi River area. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to approximately 11 a.m. on 
Tuesday, June 13, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the 11th floor conference room 
of the Hale Boggs Federal Building, 501 Magazine Street, New Orleans, 
Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LTJG Dave Seris, USCG, Recording Secretary, Lower Mississippi River 
Waterway Safety Advisory Committee, c/o Commander, Eighth Coast Guard 
District (oan), Room 1211, Hale Boggs Federal Building, 501 Magazine 
Street, New Orleans, LA 70130-3396, telephone (504) 589-2353.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given pursuant to 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Sec. 1 et seq. The 
meeting is open to the public. Members of the public may be present 
written or oral statements at the meeting. The agenda for the meeting 
consists of the following items:
    (1) Presentation of the minutes from the February 7, 1995 full 
Committee meeting.
    (2) Subcommittee Reports.
    (3) 46 CFR part 5, Marine Investigation Regulations--Personnel 
Action.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
R.C. North,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 95-11299 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
샐러드 때문에 죽다니? 

어느 날 한 번에 두 가지 일을 하고 있었습니다. 저는 고기를 준비하는 중이었는데...

... 먼저고기를 다듬고 적절하게 씻고 위생 처리를 하지 않은채 같은 도마 위에서 상추를 잘랐습니다.

도마를 씻고 헹구고 위생 처리를 하지 않아 20명의 고객이 병들었고, 그 중 한 명사망하여 우리 식당이 폐쇄되었습니다. 

어디서든 사람의 건강을 보호하십시오. 요리 도구후에는 항상 씻고 헹구고 위생 처리를 하십시오.
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust, for whichSimmons Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under mysupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report myconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

By: /s/ Ron Hooper

Ron Hooper

SVP, Royalty Trust Management

Simmons Bank

Date: November 10, 2022 
**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAND 435 

(CAND Rev. 02/2015)

TRANSCRIPT ORDER 

Please use one form per court reporter. 

 CJA counsel please use Form CJA24 

Please read instructions on next page.

1a. CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS ORDER 2a. CONTACT PHONE NUMBER 3. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS1b. ATTORNEY NAME (if different) 2b. ATTORNEY PHONE NUMBER 3. ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRES4. MAILING ADDRESS (INCLUDE LAW FIRM NAME, IF APPLICABLE) 5. CASE NAME 

8. THIS TRANSCRIPT ORDER IS FOR: 

7. COURT REPORTER NAME ( FOR FTR, LEAVE BLANK AND CHECK BOX)ȹ ޫ FTR 倯 APPEAL

倯 NON-APPEAL 

倯 CRIMINAL 倯 CIVIL 

倯 In forma pauperis (NOTE: Court or

 CJA: Do not use this form; use Form C

9. TRANSCRIPT(S) REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested), format(s) & quantity and delivery type: 

a. HEARING(S) (OR PORTIONS OF HEARINGS) b. SELECT FORMAT(S) (NOTE: ECF access is included

with purchase of PDF, text, paper or condensed.)

c . DELIVERY TYP

DATE JUDGE 

(initials)

TYPE 

(e.g. CMC) 

PORTION

If requesting less than full hearing, 

specify portion (e.g. witness or time)

PDF

(email) 

TEXT/ASCII

(email) 

PAPER CONDENSED 

(email) 

ECF ACCESS

(web) 

ORDINARY

(30-day) 

14-Day EX

F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F 

10. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, INSTRUCTIONS, QUESTIONS, ETC:ORDER & CERTIFICATION (11. & 12.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges (deposit plus additional). 12. DAT11. SIGNATURE DISTRIBUTION: 倯 COURT COPY 倯 TRANSCRIPTION COPY 倯 ORDER RECEIPT 

Ethel Villegas (650) 813-5765 EVillegas@mofo.

Arturo J. Gonzalez (415) 268-7000 AGonzalez@mof

Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-2482

Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. 

✔

04/25/2017 JSC Discove ● ● ● 

Same day delivery requested. Please email both rough draft and final transcript to evillegas@mofo.com and agonzalez@mofo.c

/s/ Arturo J. Gonzalez 04/2

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 268 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 1
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11690]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 1-9751]

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Champion Enterprises, Inc., Common Stock, $1.00 Par 
Value)

May 5, 1995.
    Champion Enterprises, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an application 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and 
Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, in addition to being listed on the Amex, 
the Securities is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. 
(``NYSE''). The Security commenced trading on the NYSE at the opening 
of business on May 2, 1995 and concurrently therewith the Security was 
suspended from trading on the Amex.
    In making the decision to withdraw the Security from listing on the 
Amex, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and expenses 
attendant in maintaining the dual listing of the Securities on the NYSE 
and the Amex. The Company does not see any particular advantage in the 
dual trading of the Securities and believes that dual listing would 
fragment the market for the Security.
    Any interested person may, on or before May 26, 1995, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549, facts bearing upon whether the 
application has been made in accordance with the rules of the Amex and 
what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11690 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2600

MARY R. WILLIAMSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Paul Trevor Sharp,

Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-735-2)

Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: June 22, 1998

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tomi W. Bryan, Lisa W. Bullard, BRYAN, BULLARD & HOUGLAN, P.C.,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr.,

United States Attorney, Gill P. Beck, Assistant United States

Attorney, Arthur J. Fried, General Counsel, Charlotte Hardnett,

Principal Deputy General Counsel, John M. Sacchetti, Acting

Associate General Counsel, Meeka M. Savage, Office of the General

Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge under 28 U.S.C. S 636(c) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Mary Williamson appeals from the magistrate judge’s* order

granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of social security benefits.

We review the denial of social security benefits to determine

whether the Commissioner has applied the correct legal standards

and whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence. See

Hays v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 1453, 1456 (4th Cir. 1990). Substantial

evidence is defined as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind

might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” See Richardson

v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971). Although substantial evidence

is greater than a mere scintilla, it may be less than a preponderance. See Shively v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 987, 989 (4th Cir. 1984).

We have reviewed Williamson’s assertions and allegations of

error under this standard and conclude that the magistrate judge’s

entry of judgment in favor of the Commissioner was proper.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Craig A. McCollam, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Dionex Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:
 1.  The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004,to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and  2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     By: /s/ Craig A. McCollam     Name: Craig A. McCollam  Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date: February 9, 2005
Joseph ARUANNO, petitioner, v. Sergeant ALLEN, et al.

No. 12-9040.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Richard Dean WHITTINGTON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0342

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
Alvaro MAZUCA, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 12-7773.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         852,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,797,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,052
<INVENTORY>                                    929,305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,268,592
<PP&E>                                      11,427,821
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,711,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,894,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,097,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       407,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          203,580
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,321,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,894,791
<SALES>                                      3,534,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,887,057
<CGS>                                        2,302,847
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,603,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                164,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   142,684
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11028]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Final Disposition of SEP Lessons-Learned Issues; Issued

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued Generic 
Letter 95-04 which informs licensees of nuclear power reactors about 
the final disposition of the 27 lessons-learned issues found in the 
Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP). This generic letter is available 
in the Public Document Rooms under accession number 9504210293.

DATES: The generic letter was issued on April 28, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Not applicable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sheri R. Peterson at (301) 415-2752.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

    Dated at Rockville, MD, this 28th day of April, 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brian K. Grimes,
Director, Division of Project Support, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-11028 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11291]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, 
Scientific Advisory Board; Notice

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee meeting:
    Date of Meeting: June 27-28, 1995 from 0830 to approximately 1700.
    Place: Sheraton National Hotel, Columbia Pike & Washington Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22204.
    Matters to be Considered: Research and Development proposals and 
continuing projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and 
Development Program funds in excess of $1M will be reviewed.
    This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the Scientific Advisory 
Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kimberly Kay, 8000 Westpark Drive, 
Suite 400, McLean, VA 22102, or telephone 703 506-4646 extension 552.

    Dated: May 3, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-11291 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EX PARTE Eric WILLIAMS

CR-17-0142

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Christopher F. FORD, petitioner, v. Michael B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Air Force.

No. 12-830.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Panagiotis ARMATAS, petitioner, v. Elena MAROULLETI, et al.

No. 12-939.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

egale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

jangelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 100

Roseville, California 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Lacy Rose 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LACY ROSE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EQUIFAX, INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 3:17-CV-00419-MMC

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TD BANK 

USA, N.A.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Lacy Rose and defendant TD 

Bank USA, National Association (“TD Bank”), that TD Bank be dismissed from this action with 

prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and that each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

//

//

//

//

//
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT TD BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

DATED: October 26, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Lacy Rose 

DATED: October 26, 2017 .Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP

By: /s/ Renee Ohlendorf

Renee Ohlendorf

Attorneys for Defendant

TD Bank USA, National Association.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Renee Ohlendorf has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, TD Bank is dismissed with prejudice, and that 

each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

November 6, 2017
Mark LOCKWOOD, DOC #T45280, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1019

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.