alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 24672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11565]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, May 16, 1995.

PLACE: The Board Room, 5th Floor, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20594.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

5745C--``Most Wanted'' Safety Recommendations Program Status Report 
and Suggested Modifications
6558--Highway/Railroad Grade Crossing Accident Report: Collision of 
Amtrak Train No. 88 with Rountree Transport and Rigging, Inc., 
Vehicle on CSX Transportation, Inc., Railroad, near Intercession 
City, Florida, November 30, 1993

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Telephone: (202) 382-0660.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Bea Hardesty, (202) 382-6525.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Bea Hardesty,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11565 Filed 5-5-95; 3:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,102
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (213)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,188
<PP&E>                                          43,494
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,440)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,922
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,247
<SALES>                                          8,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,563
<CGS>                                            5,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,111)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,111)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Marketing Order for

Marlboro Amber HeatSticks

Marketed by Philip Morris Products S.A.

The Center for Tobacco Products of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has carefully considered 

the potential environmental impact of this action and has concluded that the action will not have 

significant effects on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, an environmental impact 

statement is not required.

Philip Morris Products S.A. wishes introduce one heated tobacco product (HTP) into interstate 

commerce for commercial distribution in the United States and submitted to FDA one supplemental 

premarket tobacco product applications to obtain marketing orders under the provisions of section 

910(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

The Agency prepared the environmental assessment (EA), dated October 19, 2022, for the HTP in 

accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508) implementing 

the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and FDA’s NEPA regulations (21 CFR 25.40) to support the 

finding of no significant impact. The EA concluded that the marketing order would have no significant 

impact. The evidence supporting this finding is contained in the attached EA, which is available to the 

public upon request.

The EA evaluates potential environmental effects due to manufacturing, use, and disposal of the new 

product. No increased or new types of environmental impacts due to manufacturing the new product

are anticipated. FDA does not foresee that use of the new product would result in new or different 

environmental impacts. FDA believes that the disposal of the new product is the same as the disposal 

conditions of other HTPs that are currently marketed in the United States. Therefore, FDA does not 

foresee significant adverse impacts to the environment due to the proposed action from manufacturing, 

use, and disposal of the new product.

Approved by

Luis G. Valerio, Jr., Ph.D., ATS

Associate Director

Division of Nonclinical Science

Office of Science

Center for Tobacco Products

U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Exhibit 10.1
 Form of 2008 Stock Purchase Agreement
AXCESS INTERNATIONAL INC.
3208 Commander Drive
Carrollton, Texas 75006
  Re: Stock Purchase Agreement
  the Preferred)
 Type of Security and Purchase Price Effective Date
 Purchase Dates and Delivery of Shares
 Securities Act Legend; Registration Rights
 Securities Act
   Representations and Warranties by the Company




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties of the Purchaser
      Reaffirmation of Representations and Warranties
 Miscellaneous




---



##### 








---



##### 



Very truly yours,
AXCESS INTERNATIONAL INC.By:
    
    ,Allan Griebenow, Chief Executive Officer The undersigned agrees with and
accepts the foregoing terms and provisions
as of the date first above written.By:
    
    
    
    
    ,,Printed Name:
    
    

    ,,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

DIANA ROHRER, Individually and ) 

DIANA ROHRER and DAWN ) 

CUBBERNUSS as co-Administrators of ) 

The ESTATE OF DANIEL RICHARD ) 

ROHRER, Deceased, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC., aka NEW ENGLAND ) 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, AMERIDOSE ) 

LLC, ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL ) 

LLC, BARRY CADDEN, individually, ) 

LISA CADDEN, individually, and ) 

GREGORY CONIGLIARO, individually, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCES ON BEHALF OF 

DEFENDANT, AMERIDOSE, LLC, ONLY

 Pursuant to L.R. 83.8, Dina M. Cox, Robert M. Baker, IV, Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo of 

Lewis Wagner, LLP request leave of Court to withdraw their Appearances as attorneys for 

Defendant Ameridose, LLC only. The Law Firm of Tucker Ellis LLP has appeared and is 

substituted as counsel on behalf of Ameridose, only. 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

DINA M. COX, #18590-49 

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49 

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 15 filed 01/14/13 page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on January 14, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Richard W. Crowder 

211 S Third St 

Goshen IN 46526 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Knight S. Anderson 

TUCKER ELLIS, LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Counsel for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

 KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202-6150 

Telephone: (317) 237-0500 

Facsimile: (317) 630-2790 

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com \\lwfilesrv\DOCS\NECC\9 - Rohrer\Federal Court Pleadings\withdrawal_appearance_Ameridose.docx

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 15 filed 01/14/13 page 2 of 2
출근하기 전에 “오늘 컨디션이 좋은가?” 자문해보십시오.

질병에 걸렸을 때는 어디서든 일을 멈추고 건강을 돌보십시오.
Loan
agreement

    


    
      
        	
                Borrower:

              	
                Shanghai
      Baby Fox Fashion Co., Ltd.

              
	
                Lender:

              	
                Zengquan
      Yu

              


      

    

    


    This
agreement is entered into by and between the Borrower and the Lender through
friendly consultations, the Lender agrees to grant the Borrower ¥5,700,000 and the
interest rate is 10% per year.

    


    The
Lender remits the Borrower for three times, the date and amount are as
follow:

    


    
      
        
          	
                  May
      16th,
      2008

                	
                  ¥4,700,000;

                
	 	 
	
                  June
      5th,
      2008

                	
                  ¥750,000;

                
	 	 
	
                  June
      16th,
      2008

                	
                  ¥250,000;

                


        

      

    

    


    The
period of this loan is 2 years.

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    Borrower
      (Seal): Shanghai Baby Fox

                  	
                    Lender
      (Seal): Zengquan Yu

                  
	
                    Fashion
      Co., Ltd.

                  	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	
                    Date:
      June 16th,
      2008

                  	
                    Date:
      June 16th,
      2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6292

RONNIE CLARENCE HEADEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (CA-02-475)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Clarence Headen, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Clarence Headen, a Virginia prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Headen has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
National Property Investors 6 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000708870
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 6
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                           3,175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          64,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,256   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,625   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         26,135     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,766    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,625    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,667    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,430    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 515    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       297     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.68<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Terry BLAND v. STATE

CR-16-1147

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Supplementary
Lease Agreement

     

    Lessor
(hereinafter
referred to as Party A):Changzhou CTS
Fashion Co., Ltd.

     

    Lessee
(hereinafter
referred to as Party B):Shanghai Baby-Fox
Fashion Co., Ltd.

     

    Based on
the Lease Agreement and after further negotiation, both parties agree
that:

    


    1. For
better conveniences of Party B, Party B leases from Party A the first floor of
Building 5th of
Party A’s premises with the area 1500 square meters as their
office;

    2. Party
A lets Party B take the demised premises for a period from Jan. 1, 2007 to Dec.
30, 2009.

    3. The
rent of the DEMISED PREMISES shall be RMB 80,000 per year; Party B shall pay
half a year rent each time.

    4. By the
end of this agreement, Party B has the preferential releting right.

    5. For
outstanding issues, the two parties will resolve through
negotiation.

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    Party
      A: Changzhou CTS Fashion Co., Ltd.

                  	
                    Party
      B: Shanghai Baby-Fox Fashion Co., Ltd.

                  
	 
      	 
      
	
                    Signed
      By:

                  	
                    Signed
      By:

                  
	 
      	 
      
	
                    Date:

                  	
                    Date:
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Simmons Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
By: /s/ Ron Hooper
Ron Hooper

SVP, Royalty Trust Management

Simmons Bank

Date: May 12, 2022 
**
Elie FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9442.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 22607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11417]



[[Page 22607]]


UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE

DATE/TIME:
Thursday, May 18, 1995, 8:15 p.m.-10:30 p.m.
Friday, May 19, 1995, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
Saturday, May 20, 1995, 9:30 a.m.-12:00 Noon

LOCATION: Wye Conference Center, Queenstown, Maryland.

STATUS: (Open Session)--Portions may be closed pursuant to subsection 
(c) of section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.

AGENDA: May Board Meeting.
    Approval of Minutes of the Seventieth Meeting of the Board of 
Directors; Chairman's Report; President's Report; General Issues; 
Selection of 1995 National Peace Essay Contest Winners; Selection of 
Unsolicited Grants; Review of Institute Programs, and other matters.
CONTACT: Dr. Sheryl Brown, Director, Office of Communications, 
Telephone: (202) 457-1700.

    Dated: May 4, 1995.
Charles E. Nelson,
Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.
[FR Doc. 95-11417 Filed 5-4-95; 3:14 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00075-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

County Court at Law No. 2 of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2020-03039

Before Bassel, Kerr, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE TEXAS AIR CLASSICS, INC., Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s “1st Amended Petition for Writ of 

Mandamus” and “Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief” and is of the opinion 

that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s “1st Amended Petition for Writ of 

Mandamus” and “Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief” are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 8, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10438]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2191]


Notice Convening an Accountability Review Board for the Attack on 
the Consulate Shuttle Bus in Karachi in Which Two Americans Were Killed

    Pursuant to section 301 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and 
Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (22 U.S.C. 4831 et seq.), I have determined 
that the March 8, 1995, terrorist attack on the Consulate shuttle bus 
in Karachi, Pakistan, involved loss of life related to a U.S. mission 
abroad. Therefore, I am convening an Accountability Review Board, as 
required by that statute, to examine the facts and circumstances of the 
attack and report to me such findings and recommendations as it deems 
appropriate, in keeping with the attached mandate.
    I have appointed former Ambassador Jane Coon as chairperson of the 
board. She will be assisted by former Ambassador Peter Sebastian, 
former Ambassador Peter Moffat, Mr. James Higham, and Mr. George 
Murphy. Mr. Douglas Watson will act as Executive Secretary. The members 
will bring to their deliberations distinguished backgrounds in 
government service and private life.
    I have asked the Board to submit its conclusions and 
recommendations to the Secretary within sixty days of its first 
meeting, unless the Chairperson determines a need for additional time. 
Appropriate action will be taken and reports submitted to Congress on 
any recommendations made by the board.
    Anyone with information relevant to the board's examination of this 
incident should contact the board promptly on (202) 647-9403.
Strobe Talbott,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 95-10438 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-M