alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 116 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for a historic ceremony to commemorate Slavery Remembrance Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2024 

Mr. GREEN of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for a historic ceremony to commemorate 

Slavery Remembrance Day. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Original Resolu5 tion to Commemorate Slavery Remembrance Day in 

6 Emancipation Hall’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 116 IH 

1 SEC. 2. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO 

2 COMMEMORATE SLAVERY REMEMBRANCE 

3 DAY. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

5 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on August 

6 10, 2024, for a ceremony to commemorate Slavery Re7 membrance Day. 

8 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

9 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

10 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 

11 Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20738-20739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10346]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-060-1220-00-60016]


Restriction Order for Public Land at Blackwell Island, Cougar Bay 
and Ross Point

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Coeur d'Alene Office, Idaho.

ACTION: Notice of Restriction Order for Public Land at Blackwell 
Island, Cougar Bay and Ross Point, Order No. ID060-13.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: By order, the following closure applies to Blackwell Island, 
described as all public land in Section 11: lot 23 (portion), Section 
14: lots 3-6 (portion) and Section 15: lot 5 (portion), T.50N., R.4W., 
B.M.; Cougar Bay, described as all public land in Section 15, S1/2SW\1/
4\ (portion), and Section 22, N\1/2\ NW\1/4\ (portion), T.50N., R.4W., 
B.M.; and Ross Point, described as all public land in Section 7: lot 5 
(portion) and Section 8: lot 1 (portion) T.50N., R.4W., B.M.:

Overnight camping is prohibited.

    Maps depicting the restricted area are available for public 
inspection at the BLM, Coeur d'Alene Office, 1808 North Third St., 
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.
    The authority for establishing this restriction is Title 43, Code 
of Federal Regulations, 8364.1.
    This restriction becomes effective immediately and shall remain in 
effect until revoked and/or replaced with supplemental rules.
    This restriction does not apply to:
    (1) Any Federal, State, or local official or member of an organized 
rescue or fire fighting force while in the performance of an official 
duty.
    (2) Any Bureau of Land Management employee, agent, contractor, or 
cooperator while in the performance of an official duty.
    This restriction is necessary because the three sites do not have 
facilities which can accommodate overnight camping and the activities 
associated with long-term occupancy. In addition, due to the small 
acreage of these sites, the general urban surroundings and the 
sensitive combination of resources that are being protected, overnight 
camping is not a compatible recreation use.
    Violation of this order is punishable by a fine not to exceed 
$1,000 and/or imprisonment not to exceed 12 months.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eric Thomson, Area Manager, Bureau of Land Management, 1808 North Third 
St., Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814.

    Signed at Coeur d'Alene, Idaho this 20th day of April, 1995.

    [[Page 20739]] Dated: April 20, 1995.
Jenifer Arnold,
Acting Ecosystem Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-10346 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                        390,277
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,440
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              7,011
<PP&E>                        8,625,702
<DEPRECIATION>                5,293,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3,729,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         164,522
<BONDS>                       6,183,869
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    (2,618,460)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,729,931
<SALES>                       332,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              335,487
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 170,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              117,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            153,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (106,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (106,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  (106,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (9.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (9.48)
        

</TABLE>
Frank J. ASHMUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3133

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.12


Consent of Independent Auditors





The Board of Directors


Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.:





We consent to the use of our report dated March 28, 2014, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of KWF Real Estate Venture XII, L.P as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the year then ended, incorporated by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-174742, No. 333-175002, No. 333-175559, and No. 333-184752) on Form S-3, the registration statements (No. 333-164928 and No. 333-182269) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-164926) on Form S-1 and the registration statement (No. 333-186690) on Form S-4 of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. in reliance upon the report of KPMG, independent auditors, which report appears in amendment no. 1 to the December 31, 2013 annual report on Form 10-K of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.








/s/ KPMG


Dublin, Ireland


March 31, 2014
Freddie R. LEWIS, petitioner, v. James M. LeBLANC, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, et al.

No. 12-9637.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
James FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-5199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 2019

James Frazier, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the summary denial of Appellant's successive motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the summary denial of Appellant's inconsistent verdict claim. However, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on Appellant's newly discovered evidence claim. *See**Utile v. State* , 235 So. 3d 1045, 1048 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) ; *Simpson v. State* , 100 So. 3d 1258, 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ; *Coley v. State* , 74 So. 3d 184, 185 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for further proceedings.

Ray, Bilbrey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Simmons Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
By: /s/ Ron Hooper
Ron Hooper

SVP, Royalty Trust Management

Simmons Bank

Date: May 7, 2020 
**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1847

In re: SABRINA D. DAVIS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 (6:08-cv-01937-RBH)

Submitted: October 20, 2015 Decided: October 22, 2015

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sabrina D. Davis, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sabrina D. Davis petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking 

an order vacating the district court’s order dismissing her 

civil suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.∗ We conclude 

that Davis is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only 

in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 

U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 

516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. 

In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 

1988). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In 

re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Davis is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

 ∗ We previously affirmed the district court’s order. Davis 

v. Kia Motors Am., Inc., 408 F. App’x 731 (4th Cir 2011) (No. 

09-2296).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51493 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HILARIO GALVAN-CHAVIRA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1119-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hilario GalvanChavira raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 60

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-61 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 07, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0235. H&E INNOVATION, LLC et al. v. SHINHAN BANK AMERICA (INC).

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16C01664
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT 

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 

ARGENT TRUST COMPANY,

TRUSTEE
FOR SABINE ROYALTY TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. HooperSVP, Royalty Trust Services
Date: August 4, 2023 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine RoyaltyTrust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HERU AN DY PARDEDE, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74023 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 206- 443 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H e ru A ndyP a r de de , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of a B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence, 

# FI LED JU N 01 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74023 2 W akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049, 1056 ( 9th C i r . 2009) , a nd w e gr antthe pe t i t i on f o rr e v i e w. S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s f i ndi ng tha tthe harm P ar de de ex p eri en ceddu ri n g th e stu d en tp ro t est s an dth e b u rn i n g o f h i s ch u rch d i dn o tri se to th e le v e l o f

p e r s e c u tio n . Se e Pra s a d v . I NS , 47 F . 3d 33 6, 33 9-34 0 (9th C i r. 19 95 ). I n a n a ly z in g P a r d e d e ’s w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im , th e a g e n c yd e c lin e dto appl ythe di s f

a vor e d gr oup a na l y s i s s e tf orth i n Sa e l v . A s h c r o

ft , 386 F . 3d 922, 9 2 7 - 2 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . I n te rv e n in g c a s e law h o ld s th e d is f a v o r e dg r o up a n a ly s is ap p lie s to w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. See W

a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1062- 65; T am pu bo lon v. H

older , 5 9 8 F .3 d5 2 1 , 5 2 5 - 2 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( “a n yr e a s o n ab le fa ct fi nd erw ou l d b e c om pel l ed t o con clud e on thi s r ec ord thatC hri st i an I n d o n e s ian s a r e ad is f

a v o r e dg r o up ” ) . A c c o r d in g ly , w e r e m an dto th e B I A to consi der w hether Rusl i i s e nt i t l ed t o w i thh ol di ng of re m ov alun der Sa el a nd W a kka ry . See IN

S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c uri am ). In ad d it io n , i n as se ss in g w ith h o ld in g o f r em o v al, th e B IA sh o u ldco n sid erP ar d ed e’s p a tt e rn o rp r a c t i c e o f

p e r s e c u t i o n a n dh i s s o c i a l g r o up c l a i ms . See Sag ayda k v . G on zales , 40 5 F . 3d 10 35 , 10 40 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( “ the B IA [i s] no tfr ee t o i gn ore a r g u m e n ts r a is e db yap e titio n e r .” ) .07- 74023 3 P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
Grace v. Apple – Plaintiffs’ Proposed ESI Search Terms 

Search Terms Targeting Documents Relating to the FaceTime Break 

Date limited (November 2012 through December 2014): (FaceTime or “Face Time” or 

“FT” or Venice) /100 (break! or brok! or interrup! or expir! or glitch! or discontinu! or 

suspen! or forc! or screw! or /10 (certificate or “Device CA” or expir! or bug! or reject! 

or unauthoriz! or fail!) /10 (“iPhone 4” or “iPhone4” or “iPhone 4s” or “iPhone4S” or 

N90 or N94) 

(iOS4 or “iOS 4” or iOS4! or (iOS /2 4!) or Apex or Baker or Jasper or Phoenix or 

Durango or iOS5 or “iOS 5” or iOS5! or (iOS /2 5!) or Telluride or Hoodoo or iOS6 or 

“iOS 6” or iOS6! or (iOS /2 6!) or Sundance or Brighton or Brightonmaps or iOS7 or 

“iOS 7” or iOS7! or (iOS /2 7!) or Innsbruck or Sochi) AND certificate AND (expir! or 

bug or fail! or authent!)

Search Terms Targeting Documents Relating to iOS 7 Performance Issues 

(iOS7 or “iOS 7” or iOS7! or (iOS /2 7!) or Innsbruck or Sochi) AND (“iPhone 4” or 

“iPhone4” or “iPhone 4s” or “iPhone4S” or N90 or N94) AND (complain! or malfunctio! 

or freez! or froz! or flaw! or fail! or brick! or buckl! or lock! or crash! or slow! or bog! or 

unusable or usab! or errati! or problem! or harm! or impair! or reduc! or drain! or 

nonresponsiv! or non-responsiv! or unresponsiv! or un-responsiv! or annoy! or frustrat! 

or regress! or delay! or defect! or lose or lost or gray! or grey! or damag! or sluggis! or 

lag! or latency or die! or decreas! or wors! or “doesn’t work” or “not work” or bug! or 

incompatib! or hitch or glitch! or run! or issue! or half)

Search Terms Targeting Documents Relating to Relay Usage 

Date limited (November 2012 through May 2014): (relay or /10 Akamai) AND /10

(reduc! or /10 p2p or “peer to peer” or (usage or leve! or utiliz! or capacity or traffic or 

bandwidth or Gbps or bps or gigabits or cost or fees) /10 (FaceTime or “Face Time” or 

“FT” or Venice) /10 VirnetX

(FaceTime or “Face Time” or “FT” or Venice) AND (VirnetX or verdict or judgment or 

judge or court or patent or infring! or jury or 368.2 or 368,200,000 or royalt!) 

Search Terms Targeting Documents Relating to Potential Fixes for the FaceTime 

Break 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 75-4 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 3
Date limited (November 2012 through December 2014): (FaceTime or “Face Time” or 

FT or Venice) AND /10 (“iOS 6.1.6” or “iOS6.1.6” or Brightonmaps or fix! or restor! or 

repair or resolv!) /10 (“April 16, 2014” or certificate or “Device CA” or expir!)

 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 75-4 Filed 11/03/17 Page 2 of 3
Search Terms Targeting Documents Relating to the Value of FaceTime 

(FaceTime or “Face Time” or “FT” or Venice) AND (valu! or revenue or profit or pric! 

or cost or economi! or trade-in or resale) 

(FaceTime or “Face Time” or “FT” or Venice) AND (“iPhone 4” or “iPhone4” or 

“iPhone 4s” or “iPhone4S” or N90 or N94) AND (valu! or revenue or profit or pric! or 

cost or economi!) 

(“iPhone 4” or “iPhone4” or “iPhone 4s” or “iPhone4S” or N90 or N94) /30 (trade-in or 

resale or resell!) 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 75-4 Filed 11/03/17 Page 3 of 3