alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0579

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

CHRISTOPHER W. ROBERTSON,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Christopher W. Robertson, to all 

counsel of record, and to the Honorable Holly Brown, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 2 2020

09/02/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0579
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 8 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 8

   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
                         President pro tempore.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 20, 2021

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
                         President pro tempore.

    Resolved, That the President of the United States be notified of 
the election of the Honorable Patrick J. Leahy as President of the 
Senate pro tempore.
                                 <all>
```
N.J., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2395

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Randy Vana HAILE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-673.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
FDA is eager to hire motivated Commissioned

Corps Officers & USPHS Applicants. Here are 

various ways Corps officers & applicants can 

search for & apply to FDA vacancies:

FDA Specific Job Vacancy Sites

• Jobs at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

• Jobs at the Center for Devices and Radiological Health

• Jobs at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

• Jobs at the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

• Jobs at the Center for Tobacco Products

• Jobs at the Center for Veterinary Medicine

• Jobs at the Office of the Commissioner

• Jobs at the Office of Regulatory Affairs

• Hematology/Oncology Opportunities

• Title 21: 21st Century Cures Act Positions

Join our FDA Commissioned Corps Job Listserv

Interested in hearing about FDA job opportunities? Subscribe to our FDA-CC-JOBS@LIST.NIH.GOV listserv.

The listserv helps connect USPHS applicants/officers interested in open vacancies within FDA.

USAJobs.gov FDA.gov MAX.gov

FDA USPHS CC CV Database

Officers & Applicants interested in working for 

FDA may email a completed FDA USPHS CC 

Database interest form (linked here) and a 

copy of their CV to fdaccrec@fda.hhs.gov to 

have your information included in our FDA 

USPHS Commissioned Corps Recruitment 

Database. The CV will be available to hiring 

officials up to one year.

Please reach out to fdaccrec@fda.hhs.gov if you 

have additional questions.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 26, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1399 Lower Tribunal No. 20-1687

________________ 

### Agnieszka Dworakowska, et al. ,

Appellants,
vs. 

### Wieslaw L. Janiga , Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Celeste Hardee Muir, Judge. Adrian Philip Thomas, P.A., and Adrian P. Thomas, and Michele M. Thomas, and Ryan G. Nagle (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellants. Law Offices of George A. Minski, P.A., and George A. Minski, and Christin Coleman Gallardo (Hollywood), for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Amendment No. 3 to Capital Support Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 
 CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 3 (the “Amendment”) to the Capital Support Agreement, is made as
of the 26th day of January 2009, by and between the Northern Trust Corporation (the “Support Provider”) and Northern Trust Global Funds
plc (the “Company”) on behalf of its sub-fund The Sterling Fund (the “Fund”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Capital Support Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of February 21, 2008 and amended the Agreement on July 15, 2008 and 29th September 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties
desire to further amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein; 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to
be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings
assigned to them in the Agreement. 
 2. Section 3(c) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth
below: 
 (iii) 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 6, 2009 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this
Amendment No. 3 to the Capital Support Agreement to be executed this 26th day of January 2009. 
  

			
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ William R. Dodds, Jr.

	Name:	 	William R. Dodds, Jr.
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	50 South LaSalle Street
	Chicago
	Illinois 60675
	United States of America
	
	NORTHERN TRUST GLOBAL FUNDS PLC FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE STERLING FUND
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Boyce

	Name:	 	Michael Boyce
	Title:	 	Director
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	George’s Court
	54-62 Townsend Street
	Dublin 2
	Ireland
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10463]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-23; OTS No. 0216]


Citizens Savings & Loan Association, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 21, 1995, the Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her 
designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of Citizens Savings & Loan Association, Baton Rouge, 
Louisiana, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the 
application are available for inspection at the Information Services 
Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Midwest Regional Office, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 122 W. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, 
Texas 75039-2010.

    Dated: April 25, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10463 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 

Modified Risk Orders for 

Copenhagen Classic Snuff 

Manufactured by U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company LLC 

The Center for Tobacco Products of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has carefully considered 

the potential environmental impact of this action and has concluded that this action will not have a 

significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, an environmental impact 

statement is not required. 

U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company LLC wishes to introduce a loose moist snuff tobacco product with a 

modified risk claim into interstate commerce for commercial distribution in the United States and 

submitted to FDA a modified risk tobacco product application to obtain a modified risk order under the 

provisions of section 911(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 

The Agency prepared the environmental assessment (EA), dated October 24, 2022, in accordance with 

the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508) implementing the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and FDA’s NEPA regulations (21 CFR 25.40) to support the finding of 

no significant impact. The evidence supporting this finding is contained in the attached EA, which is 

available to the public upon request. 

The EA evaluates potential environmental effects due to manufacturing, use, and disposal of the 

tobacco product with the modified risk claim. No increased or new types of environmental impacts due 

to manufacturing the tobacco product are anticipated. The Agency does not foresee that use of the 

tobacco product would result in new or different environmental impacts. The Agency believes that 

disposal of the tobacco product is the same as the disposal conditions of similar smokeless tobacco 

products that are currently marketed. Therefore, the Agency does not foresee significant adverse 

impacts to the environment due to the proposed action as a result of manufacturing, use, and disposal 

of the tobacco product. 

Digitally signed by Luis G. Valerio -S 

Date: 2022.10.25 10:26:29 -04'00' 

Approved by ______________________________ 

Luis G. Valerio, Jr., PhD, ATS 

Associate Director 

Division of Nonclinical Science 

Office of Science 

Center for Tobacco Products 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration
William VAN POYCK, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-10696, 12A1184.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 12, 2013.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
George MARTORANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1064.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HCA HEALTHCARE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00134-VKD 

ORDER STAYING CASE 

Re: Dkt. Nos. 30, 31, 32

On February 13, 2019, the Court ordered that the complaints in this action be unsealed and 

served upon defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Dkt. No. 29. On February 

19, 2019, plaintiff-relator Zuri Lazard’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as her attorney, citing 

a “breakdown of the attorney-client relationship” and requesting 90 days for Ms. Lazard to find 

new counsel and to serve the defendants. Dkt. No. 30. Ms. Lazard’s counsel advises the Court 

that neither the United States nor the State of California object to his motion to withdraw. Dkt. 

No. 30-1 ¶ 11. On February 20, 2019, Ms. Lazard, on her own behalf, filed motions requesting a 

hearing on her counsel’s motion to withdraw and for an “informative hearing.” Dkt. Nos. 31, 32. 

A pro se relator may not prosecute a qui tam False Claims Act action on behalf of the 

United States. Stoner v. Santa Clara Cty. Office of Educ., 502 F.3d 1116, 1125–28 (9th Cir. 

2007). Accordingly, the Court will not act on the motion to withdraw at this time, but instead 

stays this action for 30 days to allow Ms. Lazard to identify new counsel. Ms. Lazard’s current 

counsel may not withdraw until the Court orders otherwise. Civ. L.R. 11-5(a); Cal. R. Prof. 

Conduct 1.16(c).

Ms. Lazard shall file a status report on or before March 24, 2019 advising the Court on her 

efforts to find new counsel. If she is unable to find substitute counsel, the Court will be required 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

to dismiss this action without prejudice to the United States and the State of California. Stoner, 

502 F.3d at 1128.

Ms. Lazard’s requests for hearings are denied at this time. She is further advised that she 

may not communicate directly with the Court by filing submissions herself; instead, she should do 

so through her attorney of record until the Court orders otherwise. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2019

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI

United States Magistrate Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  MTX
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                       132
<INVENTORY>                                     68,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,644
<PP&E>                                         211,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                 198,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          331,917
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,744
<OTHER-SE>                                     (78,517)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,781
<SALES>                                        126,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               293,996
<CGS>                                           28,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  386,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,440
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (93,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (93,829)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 99.4


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPChartered Accountants
PricewaterhouseCoopers Place
250 Howe Street, Suite 700
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada V6C 3S7
Telephone +1 604 806 7000
Facsimile +1 604 806 7806
www.pwc.com/ca
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 of GLG Life Tech Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual Report. (Signed) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered AccountantsVancouver, BC
March 31, 2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity.


---
Winston Sylvester OLIVER, II, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10135.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24864-24865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11480]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget the following public information 
collection requirements for review and clearance in accordance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be submitted on or 
before July 10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any aspect 
of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this 
burden, to: The FEMA Information Collections Clearance Officer at the 
address below; [[Page 24865]] and to Donald Arbuckle, Office of 
Management and Budget, 3235 New Executive Office Building, Washington, 
DC 20503, (202) 395-7340, within 60 days of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the above information collection request and supporting 
documentation can be obtained by calling or writing Muriel B. Anderson, 
FEMA Information Collections Clearance Officer, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-
2624.

    Type: Extension of 3067-0235.
    Title: Residential Basement Floodproofing Certificate.
    Abstract: The Residential Basement Floodproofing Certificate 
provides registered engineers and architects a standard means of 
certifying the floodproofed construction of basements lying below the 
Base Flood Elevation. The homeowner is responsible for obtaining and 
paying for the certification and providing it to: (1) The flood 
insurance agent so that the homeowner receives the ``discounted'' 
insurance rate applicable to floodproofed basements; and (2) the 
community building official as recognition that the basement is built 
according to the standards of the National Flood Insurance Program and 
is compliant with the communities floodplain management ordinance. The 
requirements for the certification are contained in a FEMA regulations 
published at 44 CFR 60.6(c)(2)(iv).
    Type of Respondents: Individuals and households; State, Local or 
Tribal Government.
    Estimate of Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden: 192 
hours.
    Number of Respondents: Reporting: 60--Homeowners/Registered 
Architects and Engineers; Recordkeepers: 46--Insurance Agents/Community 
Officials.
    Estimated Average Burden Time per Response: 3 Hours--Homeowners/
Registered Architects and Engineers; 15 minutes--Insurance Agents/
Communities Officials.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
Wesley C. Moore,
Director, Program Services Division, Operations Support Directorate.
[FR Doc. 95-11480 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

JEANETTE BROWN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SONOMA COUNTY LAND COMPANY, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00913-RMI related to

Case No. 18-cv-02699-RMI 

ORDER

On May 17, 2022, this matter came on for a Case Management Conference at which the 

court informed the parties that it would delay issuing the order dismissing the state court claims

until after the parties had engaged in a final round of dispute resolution, on the basis that any 

resolution may save the parties the time and expenses related to any future state court filings. 

Thus, the court intended to set a timeline for the final mediation, followed by dismissal of the state 

court claims, and the briefing of attorneys’ fees. However, just prior to the conference, Defendants 

filed a “Status Report,” in which they state that they intend to assert their “exemption from certain 

Americans with Disabilities Act requirements.” (Dkt. 103 at 2). The Status Report offers no more 

explanation regarding how Defendants might be exempted from the ADA and a claim of 

exemption is certainly not apparent on its face. Moreover, as acknowledged by stand-in counsel, 

such a claim would likely be decided as a matter of law and subject to motions practice. But the 

time for such motions has passed. Indeed, Defendants’ statement regarding exemptions is 

inconsistent with the stated position that the “Parties and Counsel agree that all of the 20 

injunctive and equitable claims of Plaintiffs have been settled. The settlement agreements between 

the Parties have been completely performed.” (Dkt. 103 at 2). This is no different than other 

Case 1:17-cv-00913-RMI Document 114 Filed 05/18/22 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

statements made by Defendants in the past.

 It may be then that Defendants’ inclusion of this statement in the report was in error, but 

stand-in counsel was unsure. In any event, Plaintiffs’ counsel correctly identified that any such 

“exemption” claims would need to be resolved prior to a further settlement conference.

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants shall, on or before June 8, 2022, file a 

notice with the court as to whether they intend to pursue any claims of exemption from the ADA, 

identify such claims and the bases for them, and in what form they intend to present the claims. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2022

ROBERT M. ILLMAN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:17-cv-00913-RMI Document 114 Filed 05/18/22 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000710182
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   15,411,828
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    567,857
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         955,630
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,850,648
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,785,963
<COMMON>                                     3,886,521
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          2,679,432
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               6,565,953
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          843,890
<PREFERRED>                                    115,055
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         5,533,067
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  357,729
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,370,269
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               18,785,963
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    5,120,813
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           429,003
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,578,960
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   4,007,963
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,112,850
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 882
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,113,732
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       408,464
<NET-INCOME>                                   706,663
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      9,441
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  697,222
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      363,243
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,545,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>