alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 3:17-cv-00359 Notice of Appearance of Basil P. Fthenakis 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Basil P. Fthenakis, Esq. (88399) 

CRITERION LAW 

2225 E. Bayshore Road, Suite 200 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Tel. (650) 352-8400 

Fax. (650) 352-8408 

bpf@criterionlaw.com 

David S. Godkin 

James E. Kruzer 

BIRNBAUM & GODKIN, LLP 

280 Summer Street 

Boston, MA 02210 

(617) 307-6100 

godkin@birnbaumgodkin.com 

kruzer@birnbaumgodkin.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

SIX4THREE, LLC, a Delaware 

limited liability company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SIX4THREE, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

MEDIA TEMPLE INC., a Delaware 

corporation, 

 Defendants. 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00359-WHA

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF 

BASIL P. FTHENAKIS AS COUNSEL 

FOR PLAINTIFF SIX4THREE, LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 3 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 3
Case No. 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Notice of Appearance of Basil P. Fthenakis 

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

 I, BASIL P. FTHENAKIS, of Criterion Law, hereby enters my appearance as counsel for 

Plaintiff Six4Three, LLC in this matter. I am a member of the State Bar of California and am 

admitted to practice in Northern District of California. My address and telephone number are as 

follows: 

Basil P. Fthenakis 

Criterion Law 

2225 E. Bayshore Road 

Suite 200 

Palo Alto CA 94303 

(650) 352-8400 

 Please serve said counsel with all pleadings and notices in this action. 

DATED: January 25, 2017 CRITERION LAW 

BIRNBAUM & GODKIN LLP 

By: /s/ Basil P. Fthenakis

Basil P. Fthenakis, Esq. 

David S. Godkin, Esq. 

James E. Kruzer, Esq. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Six4Three, LLC 

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 3 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 3
Case No. 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Notice of Appearance of Basil P. Fthenakis 

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 

California, that I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using 

the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Sonal N. Mehta 

Laura E. Miller 

Catherine Y. Kim 

Durie Tangri LLP 

217 Leidesdorff Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

DATED: January 25, 2017 

By: /s/ Basil P. Fthenakis 

 Basil P. Fthenakis

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 3 Filed 01/25/17 Page 3 of 3
Bernard D. ACKERMAN, petitioner, v. Earl MORELAND.

No. 12-8706.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Deborah Ann PERNA, petitioner, v. Mary LATTIMORE, Warden.

No. 12-7977.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 88-6 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 88-6 Filed 04/12/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 88-6 Filed 04/12/18 Page 3 of 3
Timothy W. HUGHES, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-8760.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
August 21, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

K.J. AND V.J. INDIVI DUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND S OF E.J., Appellant s

NO. 14

- 10

- 01188

- CV V.

USA WATER POLO, INC. , CHRIS CULLEN, JASO N PUYEAR, W.G., JR., AS NEXT FRIEND OF W.G., III, K.G. AND L.G. AS NEX T FRIENDS OF T.G., M .K. AND L.K. AS NEXT FRIENDS OF K .K., B.R.AND B.R. AS NEXT FRIENDS OF B.R. , W.S. AS

NEXT FRIEND OF P.S. AND J.S. , Appellee s

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judg ment in favor of appellee s , USA Water Polo, Inc., Chris Cullen, Jason Puyear, W.G., Jr. as N ext F riend of W.G., III , K.G. and L.G. as Next Friends of T.G., M.K. and L.K. as Next Friends of K.K., BR. and B.R. as Next Friends of B.R., W.S. as Next Friend of P.S. and J.S., signed August 31, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s , K.J. and V.J. Individually and as Next Friends of E.J., to pay all costs in this appeal. We further order the decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.37


                              [Company Letterhead]

January 21, 2004


                                LETTER AGREEMENT

Mathias A. Valentine
2299 Busse Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007


         In connection with a public offering of the Common Stock of John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (the "Company"), you have indicated a desire to include
in such offering 214,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company owned or
controlled by you, plus an additional number of shares to be determined pursuant
to the underwriters' over-allotment option. All such shares you wish to include
in the public offering are presently held in the form of Class A Common Stock of
the Company ("Class A Stock") and would have to be converted into shares of
Common Stock to be included in the offering.

         By signing this Letter Agreement, you agree that, simultaneously upon
the purchase of the Company Common Stock by the underwriters in connection with
the public offering, you shall convert into shares of Company Common Stock (1)
214,000 shares of Class A Stock, plus (2) the number of shares of your Class A
Stock equal to the number of shares of Company Common Stock the underwriters
elect to purchase from you pursuant to their over-allotment option.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, you and the Company agree that such conversion
will not in any way be deemed effective (including, without limitation, for
purposes of Part 4 of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation)
unless the underwriters purchase our Common Stock. If the underwriters do not
purchase your shares, none of your Class A Stock shall have been converted
pursuant hereto.

         Under no circumstances shall this Letter Agreement be deemed to
constitute a written notice of conversion under Part 4(f) of the Company's
Restated Certificate of Incorporation.


                                Very truly yours,

                             /s/ MICHAEL J. VALENTINE

                             Michael J. Valentine
                             John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
                             Executive Vice President Finance, Chief
                                  Financial Officer and Secretary





                                              /s/ MATHIAS A. VALENTINE
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                  Mathias A. Valentine
# L_2018306DE.01007201.xml

| 30.11.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 306/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 306/72

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie (EU) 2018/852 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 30. Mai 2018 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 94/62/EG über Verpackungen und Verpackungsabfälle

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 150 vom 14. Juni 2018
  )

Auf Seite 153 Anhang Nummer 2 Buchstabe b Ziffer iii, einzufügende Tabelle, Überschrift:

Anstatt:

„Wiederverwendbare Verpackungen“

muss es heißen:

„Wiederverwendbare Verkaufsverpackungen“.

---
Monty Marcellus SHELTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9393.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
LeSean ROBERTS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9377.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# L_2019334EN.01016401.xml

| 27.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 334/164 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 334/164

---

Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 321 of 17 December 2018
  )

| 1. | On page 122, point (b) of Article 32(4): |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 122, point (b) of Article 32(4):

for:

for:

| ‘(b) | designate an undertaking as having, either individually or jointly with others, significant market power, under Article 67(3) or (4);’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

designate an undertaking as having, either individually or jointly with others, significant market power, under Article 67(3) or (4);’,

read:

read:

| ‘(b) | decide whether or not to designate an undertaking as having, either individually or jointly with others, significant market power, under Article 67(3) or (4);’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(b)

decide whether or not to designate an undertaking as having, either individually or jointly with others, significant market power, under Article 67(3) or (4);’.

| 2. | On page 145, first subparagraph of Article 61(1): |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 145, first subparagraph of Article 61(1):

for:

for:

‘1.   National regulatory authorities or other competent authorities in the case of points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 of this Article shall, acting in pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 3, ...’,

read:

read:

‘1.   National regulatory authorities or, in the case of points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 of this Article, national regulatory authorities or other competent authorities shall, acting in pursuit of the objectives set out in Article 3, ...’.

| 3. | On page 145, first subparagraph of Article 61(2): |
| --- | --- |

3.

On page 145, first subparagraph of Article 61(2):

for:

for:

‘2.   In particular, without prejudice to measures that may be taken regarding undertakings designated as having significant market power in accordance with Article 68, national regulatory authorities, or other competent authorities in the case of points (b) and (c) of this subparagraph, shall be able to impose: ...’,

read:

read:

‘2.   In particular, without prejudice to measures that may be taken regarding undertakings designated as having significant market power in accordance with Article 68, national regulatory authorities or, in the case of points (b) and (c) of this subparagraph, national regulatory authorities or other competent authorities shall be able to impose: ...’.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORI NIXON,

Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGE R. BLUMENTHAL,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00937-SK 

THIRD ORDER REQUIRING JOINT 

STATUS REPORT

Regarding Docket No. 65

On October 15, 2018, the Court required the parties to file status reports every six months, 

or sooner if the writ proceeding was terminated, setting forth the status of the writ proceeding. 

The parties filed a joint status report on April 16, 2020, but have not filed one since. By no later 

than November 24, 2020, the parties shall file a report to inform the Court regarding the status of 

the writ proceeding. Moreover, the parties are reminded that they have an obligation to file status 

reports every six months, without an additional order to do so each time. If the parties again fail to 

timely file a status report, the Court will dismiss this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 13, 2020

______________________________________

SALLIE KIM

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00937-SK Document 73 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.



|                               |  |                             
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|Subsidiary                     |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. |  | Maryland                    
|Grizzly Equity LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Grizzly Ventures LLC           |  | Delaware                    
|Whale Holdings LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Whale Interests LLC            |  | Delaware                    
|Whale Ventures LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Yak Management LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Yak Interest LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|Yak Ventures LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|Xeres Management LLC           |  | Delaware                    
|Xeres Interest LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Xeres Ventures LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|DF Technical Services, LLC     |  | Delaware                    
|DF Property Management LLC     |  | Delaware                    
|DF Holdings I LLC              |  | Delaware                    
|Rhino Equity LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|Quill Equity LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|Lemur Properties LLC           |  | Delaware                    
|Porpoise Ventures LLC          |  | Delaware                    
|Tarantula Interests LLC        |  | Delaware                    
|Tarantula Ventures LLC         |  | Delaware                    
|Fox Properties LLC             |  | Delaware
Dorothy OLLIE, petitioner, v. PLANO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 12-10147.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11095]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems; 
Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems 
(#1190).
    Date and Time: May 21-22, 1995, 8:15 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 380, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1370.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. M.C. Roco, Program Director, Fluid, 
Particulate, & Hydraulic Systems, CTS, Room 525, (703) 306-1371.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the NSF Research 
Equipment Grants proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11095 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
David ANDERSON, et al., petitioners, v. Christopher COX, et al.

No. 12-1138.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jeffrey Earl SMITH, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7666.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Richie DESAUGUSTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3531

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 12, 2019]

Richie Desauguste, Punta Gorda, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed. See**Hart v. State* , 246 So. 3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

May, Ciklin and Levine, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A3 for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

s/Phillip Bloom______________________________

Phillip Bloom, Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer

 

s/David Miller_______________________________

David Miller, President and

Principal Executive Officer

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the

Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Textron Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas J. Cullen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                          /s/ Thomas J. Cullen
                          -----------------------------------------------------
                          Thomas J. Cullen
                          Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                          Date: November 8, 2002


                                       28
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 13

- 00119

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.E. , a Child From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012EM504169 Honorable Jim Rausch, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 3, 2013
DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On February 21, 2013, t he trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record ha d not been filed in this appeal because appellant ha d failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. Appellant was ordered to provide written proof to this court by February 13, 2013, that either (1) the clerk’s fee ha d been paid or arrangements ha d been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appe llant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. This court’s order cautioned that if appellant failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).04

- 13

- 00119

- CV

- 2

- Appellant did not respond to this court’s order. Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.
PER CURIAM
David DAY, petitioner, v. SBC (AT & T) DISABILITY INCOME PLAN.

No. 12-1144.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 STATEMENT RE CLASS NOTICE 

3:17-CV-00850-WHA 

RANDALL W. EDWARDS (S.B. #179053) 

redwards@omm.com 

MATTHEW D. POWERS (S.B. #212682) 

mpowers@omm.com 

DAMALI A. TAYLOR (S.B. #262489) 

dtaylor@omm.com 

ADAM M. KAPLAN (S.B. #298077) 

akaplan@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3823 

Telephone: (415) 984-8700 

Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARTIN DULBERG, individually, and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and RASIER, 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00850-WHA 

STATEMENT REGARDING 

COMPLETION OF CLASS NOTICE 

Case 3:17-cv-00850-WHA Document 89 Filed 03/26/18 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 - 1 - STATEMENT RE CLASS NOTICE 

3:17-CV-00850-WHA 

Pursuant to the Court’s March 2, 2018 Order Approving Proposed Class Notice And 

Distribution Plan (ECF No. 84), Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC hereby 

state that the Class Administrator in this case, Angeion Group, has confirmed that the distribution 

of class notice was completed on March 22, 2018. 

 Dated: March 26, 2018 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

 By: /s/ Mathew D. Powers 

 Matthew D. Powers 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC 

Case 3:17-cv-00850-WHA Document 89 Filed 03/26/18 Page 2 of 2