alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEWIS DOMINIC SHAW,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. THOMAS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00462-YGR (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO PROVIDE 

REQUIRED INFORMATION NECESSARY 

TO LOCATE DEFENDANTS HANSEN

AND DORFMAN

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the present pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. Thereafter, the Court issued its Order of Service.

Service has been ineffective on Defendants M. Hansen and Dorfman. In an Order dated 

September 26, 2017, Plaintiff was directed to provide the Court with the required information 

necessary to locate these Defendants. Dkt. 38. He was also informed that the failure to do so shall 

result in the dismissal of all claims against these Defendants. 

Plaintiff has filed a request for an extension of time to provide the Court with the required 

information necessary to locate these Defendants.1 Dkt. 41. Having read and considered 

Plaintiff’s request, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED. 

The time in which Plaintiff may provide the Court with the required information necessary to 

locate these Defendants will be extended up to and including December 15, 2017. Failure to do 

so by the new deadline shall result in the dismissal of all claims against these Defendants. 

This Order terminates Docket No. 41. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 Dated: ______________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Court Judge

 

1

Plaintiff also requests an extension of time to provide the Court with the required 

information necessary to locate Defendant D. George. See Dkt. 41. However, the Court considers 

such a request as moot because the record shows that Defendant George has been served and has 

since filed an answer to the complaint. Dkt. 42.
Case 3:17-mc-80023-JD Document 1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 92-1556
RAINER GUIDO VEERKAMP, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A22-609-570) Submitted: September 23, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David N. Soloway, FRAZIER, SOLOWAY & POORAK, Atlanta, Georgia, for Petitioner. Stuart M. Gerson, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas W. Hussey, Deputy Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Divsiion, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Rainer Guido Veerkamp petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' reversal of the Immigration Judge's order granting his application for a waiver of deportation under § 212(h) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1182(h) (West Supp. 1997). The Board of Immigration Appeals granted Veerkamp's motion to reopen deportation proceedings and remanded the case to the Immigration Judge for further proceedings. Therefore, the decision Veerkamp sought to be reviewed no longer is in effect. Because no appeal currently is ripe for review before this court, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Stephen WAMLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-4003

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 2, 2019

Rachael E. Reese, of O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*799AFFIRMED. *See**Curry v. State* , 257 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Los Efectos del Tabaquismo en la Salud 

|

Fumar causa daño 

a casi todos los órganos 

del cuerpo y conduce 

a una muerte prematura. 

|

En los Estados Unidos, 

1 de cada 3 muertes por cáncer 

está relacionada con el tabaquismo. 

El tabaquismo es una de las principales causas

de enfermedad cardiovascular, que es la principal 

causa de muerte en los Estados Unidos. 

El tabaquismo 

causa 1 de cada 4 

muertes por 

enfermedad 

cardiovascular. 

|

Fumar aumenta el riesgo

de sufrir un accidente 

cerebrovascular. 

Las muertes por accidente 

cerebrovascular son más 

probables entre los fumadores 

que entre los exfumadores o las 

personas que nunca han fumado. 

|

|

Casi 8 de cada 10 casos 

de enfermedad pulmonar 

obstructiva crónica (EPOC) son 

causados por el tabaquismo. 

|

Fumar antes, durante 

y después del embarazo puede 

perjudicar la salud del bebé.

Fumar es una de las causas de la diabetes tipo 2. 

|

Más de 34 millones de adultos 

en los Estados Unidos tienen diabetes. 

|

El humo de

segunda mano

causa más de 

40,000 

muertes al año. 

CENTRO PARA PRODUCTOS DE TABACO 

CTP-198-S
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but
solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



SOUTHWEST BANK, TRUSTEE FOR SABINE ROYALTY
TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper
SVP, Royalty Trust Management


Date: August 4, 2016

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Henry C. DAWSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10228.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Teresa WATSON, petitioner, v. Stephanie DENNIS.

No. 12-9823.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
Case 4:05-cr-00309-MJJ Document 18 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:05-cr-00309-MJJ Document 18 Filed 07/12/05 Page 2 of 2
STATE of Louisiana v. Wayne J. TAYLOR

No. 2019-KP-0311

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, COURT OF APPEAL, PARISH OF PLAQUEMINES**

PER CURIAM:

*871Writ granted. The court of appeal erred in its application of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), to find defendant's trial was rendered fundamentally unfair and the verdict unreliable when counsel's examination of a witness lead to the admission of other crimes evidence that would have otherwise been excluded. *See* *State v. Taylor* , 18-0950 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1/23/19) (unpub'd) (Brown, J., dissenting). Based on the evidence presented at trial, which included proof by DNA evidence that defendant had been inside the place of business he was not authorized to enter, *see* *State v. Taylor* , 14-0432 (La. 3/17/15), 166 So.3d 988, the district court correctly determined that defendant failed to carry his burden of showing prejudice under *Strickland* 's second prong. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeal and reinstate the district court's ruling, which denied defendant's application for post-conviction relief.

Defendant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Respondent's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, respondent has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

**REVERSED**

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350I,
 Lisa K. Vansickle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First
 Banks, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:(1)
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
 period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
 of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company. Date: May
 14, 2009By:
/s/
 Lisa K. VansickleLisa K. VansickleSenior Vice President and Chief
 Financial Officer(Principal Financial and
 Accounting Officer)50
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

y0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141674

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141674 COA: 296792 Jackson CC: 09-002234-AV BRIAN COOPER and LISA K. COOPER, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 16, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Ralph I. ZOGHEIB, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10040.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.



|                               |  |                             
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|Subsidiary                     |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P. |  | Maryland                    
|Safari Ventures LLC            |  | Delaware                    
|Grizzly Equity LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Grizzly Ventures LLC           |  | Delaware                    
|Whale Holdings LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Whale Interests LLC            |  | Delaware                    
|Whale Ventures LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Yak Management LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Yak Interest LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|Yak Ventures LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|Xeres Management LLC           |  | Delaware                    
|Xeres Interest LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|Xeres Ventures LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|DF Technical Services, LLC     |  | Delaware                    
|DF Property Management LLC     |  | Delaware                    
|Rhino Equity LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|Quill Equity LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|Lemur Properties LLC           |  | Delaware                    
|Porpoise Ventures LLC          |  | Delaware                    
|Tarantula Interests LLC        |  | Delaware                    
|Tarantula Ventures LLC         |  | Delaware                    
|Fox Properties LLC             |  | Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          38,642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  576,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    782,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,842,861
<PP&E>                                      10,547,625
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,745,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,862,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,225,145
<BONDS>                                     13,601,459
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,318,431
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,282,267)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,862,768
<SALES>                                     11,288,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,326,913
<CGS>                                        2,207,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,561,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,255,925
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             269,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (967,256)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (328,868)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (638,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (638,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22370-22371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11072]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 042695B]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

[[Page 22371]] ACTION: Issuance of public display permit no. 952

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Mr. Emil Popescu (P585), has been 
issued a permit for public display purposes.

ADDRESSES: The permit is available for review by appointment in the 
following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, NOAA, 1315 
East-West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); 
and
    Director, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, 
Long Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4016);

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, March 22, 1995, notice was 
published in the Federal Register (60 FR 15128) that an application had 
been filed by Emil Popescu, Las Vegas, NV. A public display permit was 
requested to import three Patagonian sea lions into the United States 
from France for public display purposes. The requested permit has been 
issued subject to the provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 
1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), and the conditions set 
forth therein.

    Dated: April 28, 1995.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits & Documentation Division, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 95-11072 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1069/033012-0004 

10985122.1 a05/30/17 -1- 

ORDER RE REQUEST TO APPEAR 

TELEPHONICALLY AT CMC

CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00877-HSG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

JUDITH BADGLEY, as Executor of the 

Estate of Patricia Yoder, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 4:17-cv-00877-HSG

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST 

FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT 

JUNE 6, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE 

Action filed: Jan. 23, 2017 

Trial date: Not set 

Having considered the request of lead trial counsel for plaintiff Judith 

Badgley, as Executor of the Estate of Patricia Yoder (“Plaintiff”), to appear 

telephonically at the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter scheduled 

for June 6, 2017 in Courtroom 2 of the above-captioned court located at 1301 Clay 

Street, 4th Floor, Oakland, California, and finding good cause therefore, the Court 

ORDERS as follows: 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1069/033012-0004 

10985122.1 a05/30/17 -2- 

ORDER RE REQUEST TO APPEAR 

TELEPHONICALLY AT CMC

CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00877-HSG

Trial counsel for Plaintiff is granted leave to appear telephonically at the 

Initial Case Management Conference in this matter on June 6, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 

Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the 

telephonic appearance. 

Dated: 5/31/2017 

 HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10961]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP94-229-003]


Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

April 28, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 25, 1995, Granite State Gas Transmission, 
Inc. (Granite State) tendered for filing the revised tariff sheets 
listed below in its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, 
containing changes in rates for effectiveness on May 1, 1995:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 21
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 22
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 23

    According to Granite State, the Commission issued an order on April 
13, 1995, approving a Stipulation and Agreement settling Granite 
State's rate proceeding in Docket No. RP94-229. It is further stated 
that the tariff sheets listed above reflect the revised Base Tariff 
Rates for Granite State's transportation services approved in the 
settlement and, according to the terms of the settlement, such rates 
are to be effective on the first day of the month following the 
approval of the Stipulation and Agreement.
    Granite State further states that copies of its filing have been 
mailed to its customers and the regulatory commissions of the States of 
Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capital 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests should be filed on or before May 5, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10961 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Jorge DE JESUS-CASTANEDA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10150.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
PD-0811-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 7/17/2015 3:43:03 PM

Accepted 7/21/2015 9:14:26 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 4 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 4 Filed 02/13/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 4 Filed 02/13/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 4 Filed 02/13/17 Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael C. Litt, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golden Pond Healthcare, Inc. (“registrant”); 

2. Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) (omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238); 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 28, 2008