Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 1995 / Proposed Rules 3601

relationships that characterize a

property will be avoided.

(3) Each property will be recognized

as a physical record of its time, place,

and use. Work needed to stabilize,

consolidate, and conserve existing

historic materials and features will be

physically and visually compatible,

identifiable upon close inspection, and

properly documented for future

research.

(4) Changes to a property that have

acquired historic significance in their

own right will be retained and

preserved.

(5) Distinctive materials, features,

finishes, and construction techniques or

examples of craftsmanship that

characterize a property will be

preserved.

(6) The existing condition of historic

features will be evaluated to determine

the appropriate level of intervention

needed. Where the severity of

deterioration requires repair or limited

replacement of a distinctive feature, the

new material will match the old in

composition, design, color, and texture.

(7) Chemical or physical treatments, if

appropriate, will be undertaken using

the gentlest means possible. Treatments

that cause damage to historic materials

will not be used.

(8) Archeological resources shall be

protected and preserved in place. If

such resources must be disturbed,

mitigation measures shall be

undertaken.

(b) Rehabilitation. (1) A property will

be used as it was historically or be given

a new use that requires minimal change

to its distinctive materials, features,

spaces, and spatial relationships.

(2) The historic character of a

property will be retained and preserved.

The removal of distinctive materials or

alteration of features, spaces, and spatial

relationships that characterize a

property will be avoided.

(3) Each property shall be recognized

as a physical record of its time, place,

and use. Changes that create a false

sense of historical development, such as

adding conjectural features or elements

from other historic properties, shall not

be undertaken.

(4) Changes to a property that have

acquired historic significance in their

own right shall be retained and

preserved.

(5) Distinctive materials, features,

finishes, and construction techniques or

examples of craftsmanship that

characterize a property shall be

preserved.

(6) Deteriorated historic features will

be repaired rather than replaced. Where

the severity of deterioration requires

replacement of a distinctive feature, the

new feature will match the old in

design, color, texture, and, where

possible, materials. Replacement of

missing features will be substantiated by

documentary and physical evidence.

(7) Chemical or physical treatments, if

appropriate, will be undertaken using

the gentlest means possible. Treatments

that cause damage to historic materials

will not be used.

(8) Archeological resources shall be

protected and preserved in place. If

such resources must be disturbed,

mitigation measures will be undertaken.

(9) New additions, exterior

alterations, or related new construction

will not destroy historic materials,

features, and spatial relationships that

characterize the property. The new work

will be differentiated from the old and

will be compatible with the historic

materials, features, size, scale and

proportion, and massing to protect the

integrity of the property and its

environment.

(10) New additions and adjacent or

related new construction will be

undertaken in such a manner that, if

removed in the future, the essential

form and integrity of the historic

property and its environment would be

unimpaired.

(c) Restoration. (1) A property will be

used as it was historically or be given

a new use that interprets the property

and its restoration period.

(2) Materials and features from the

restoration period will be retained and

preserved. The removal of materials or

alteration of features, spaces, and spatial

relationships that characterize the

period will be not be undertaken.

(3) Each property will be recognized

as a physical record of its time, place,

and use. Work needed to stabilize,

consolidate and conserve materials and

features from the restoration period will

be physically and visually compatible,

identifiable upon close inspection, and

properly documented for future

research.

(4) Materials, features, spaces, and

finishes that characterize other

historical periods will be documented

prior to their alteration or removal.

(5) Distinctive materials, features,

finishes, and construction techniques or

examples of craftsmanship that

characterize the restoration period will

be preserved.

(6) Deteriorated features from the

restoration period will be repaired

rather than replaced. Where the severity

of deterioration requires replacement of

a distinctive feature, the new feature

will match the old in design, color,

texture, and, where possible, materials.

(7) Replacement of missing features

from the restoration period will be

substantiated by documentary and

physical evidence. A false sense of

history will not be created by adding

conjectural features, features from other

properties, or by combining features that

never existed together historically.

(8) Chemical or physical treatments, if

appropriate, will be undertaken using

the gentlest means possible. Treatments

that cause damage to historic materials

will not be used.

(9) Archeological resources affected

by a project will be protected and

preserved in place. If such resources

must be disturbed, mitigation measures

will be undertaken.

(10) Designs that were never executed

historically will not be constructed.

(d) Reconstruction. (1) Reconstruction

will be used to depict vanished or nonsurviving portions of a property when

documentary and physical evidence is

available to permit accurate

reconstruction with minimal conjecture,

and such reconstruction is essential to

the public understanding of the

property.

(2) Reconstruction of a landscape,

building, structure, or object in its

historic location will be preceded by a

thorough archeological investigation to

identify and evaluate those features and

artifacts that are essential to an accurate

reconstruction. If such resources must

be disturbed, mitigation measures will

be undertaken.

(3) Reconstruction will include

measures to preserve any remaining

historic materials, features, and spatial

relationships.

(4) Reconstruction will be based on

the accurate duplication of historic

features and elements substantiated by

documentary or physical evidence

rather than on conjectural designs or the

availability of different features from

other historic properties. A

reconstructed property will re-create the

appearance of the non-surviving historic

property in materials, design, color, and

texture.

(5) A reconstruction will be clearly

identified as a contemporary re-creation.

(6) Designs that were never executed

historically will not be constructed.

Dated: November 9, 1994.

George T. Frampton, Jr.,

Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and

Parks.

[FR Doc. 95–1043 Filed 1–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
3602 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 18, 1995 / Proposed Rules

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52

[MN20–2–6751b; FRL–5140–3]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans for Air Quality

Planning Purposes; Minnesota

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The USEPA proposes to

approve the sulfur dioxide (SO2) State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for

the St. Paul Park area of Air Quality

Control Region 131. The Minnesota

Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)

submitted a proposed SIP revision for

SO2 for the St. Paul Park area on

December 11, 1992, in response to

modeled violations of the SO2 National

Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS). The submittal included an

administrative order for the Ashland

Petroleum Company-St. Paul Park

Refinery, in addition to dispersion

modeling and technical support

intended show that the limits are

sufficient to attain and maintain the

NAAQS for SO2. A subsequent SIP

revision, containing an amended

administrative order for Ashland

Petroleum Company and additional

technical support, was submitted on

September 30, 1994. In the Final Rules

Section of this Federal Register, USEPA

is approving the State’s SIP revision as

a direct final rule because the Agency

views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. Additionally, a

notice of proposed disapproval of the

SIP revision was published on

September 2, 1994 (59 FR 54653). In

that document, it was specifically stated

that if the issues identified within were

satisfactorily addressed in the allotted

time and if no other substantive, adverse

comments were received, USEPA would

proceed with a direct final approval. No

comments were received on the

proposed rulemaking. A detailed

rationale for the approval is set forth in

the direct final rule. If no adverse

comments are received in response to

that direct final rule no further activity

is contemplated in relation to this

proposed rule. If USEPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. The USEPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this notice.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received on or before February

17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be mailed to: William L. MacDowell,

Chief, Regulation Development Section,

Air Enforcement Branch (AE–17J),

United States Environmental Protection

Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,

Chicago, Illinois 60604.

Copies of the State submittal and

USEPA’s analysis are available for

public inspection during normal

business hours at the following address:

United States Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation

Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard

(AE–17J), Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Robinson, Air Enforcement

Branch, Regulation Development

Section (AE–17J), United States

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)

353–6713.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule published in the rules section

of the Federal Register.

Dated: December 16, 1994.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–1084 Filed 1–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[WI33–01–5764b; FRL–5135–3]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plan for Wisconsin

AGENCY: United States Environmental

Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The USEPA proposes to

approve the State Implementation Plan

(SIP) revision submitted by the State of

Wisconsin for the purposes of meeting

requirements of the Clean Air Act (ACT)

with regard to new source review in

areas that have not attained the national

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).

This action also proposes approval of

Wisconsin’s Operating Permits rule as

satisfying USEPA’s criteria regarding

Federal enforceability. In the Final

Rules section of this Federal Register,

USEPA is approving these SIP revisions

as direct final rules without prior

proposal because the Agency views

them as noncontroversial revision

amendments and anticipates no adverse

comments. A detailed rationale for the

approval is set forth in the direct final

rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this rule. If USEPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. USEPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this action. Any parties

interested in commenting on this action

should do so at this time. Adverse

comments received concerning a

specific rulemaking area, will only

affect the final rule as it pertains to that

area and only the portion of the final

rule concerning the area receiving

adverse comments will be withdrawn.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by February

17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to: Carlton

Nash, Chief, Regulation Development

Section, Air Toxics and Radiation

Branch, United States Environmental

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard (AT–18J), Chicago, Illinois

60604.

Copies of the State’s submittal and

USEPA’s technical support document

are available for inspection during

normal business hours at the following

locations: United States Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and

Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson

Boulevard (AT–18J), Chicago, Illinois

60604; and

Wisconsin Department of Natural

Resources, 101 South Webster Street,

P.O. Box 7921, Madison, Wisconsin

53707.

A copy of this SIP revision is also

available at the Office of Air and

Radiation, Docket and Information

Center (Air Docket 6102), room M1500,

USEPA, 401 M Street, SW., Washington,

DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Constantine Blathras, USEPA (AT–18J),

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0671.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the

information provided in the Direct Final

action which is located in the Rules

Section of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: December 16, 1994.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–1086 Filed 1–17–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P