20792 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 1995 / Notices

the limits of liability and a streamlined

tacit amendment procedure, and several

key decisions were made regarding

limits for passenger claims. The

protocol to the ’76 LLMC will also be

the subject of the Spring 1996

diplomatic conference, on an equal

priority with the HNS Convention.

Therefore, the 72nd session was also the

last session of the Legal Committee to

discuss substantive revisions to the ’76

LLMC. Although the United States has

not ratified the ’76 LLMC, interests

within the United States—such as

owners of foreign flag vessels and

passengers on foreign flag vessels—may

be affected by changes to the

Convention. The views of the public are

requested.

At the 73rd Session of the Legal

Committee, preliminary negotiations

will take place regarding an

international convention on offshore

mobile craft and an international

convention on wreck removal. The

eighth session of the Joint

Intergovernmental Group of Experts on

Maritime Liens and Mortgages will meet

October 9–10, the first two days of the

73rd Session of the Legal Committee, to

finalize a draft international convention

on the arrest of ships.

Members of the public are invited to

attend the SHC meeting, up to the

seating capacity of the room. For further

information or to submit views

concerning the subjects of discussion,

contact either Captain David J. Kantor or

Lieutenant Commander Steve D. Poulin,

U.S. Coast Guard (G–LMI), 2100 Second

Street SW., Washington, DC 20593,

telephone (202) 267–1527, telefax (202)

267–4496.

Dated: April 19, 1995.

Charles A. Mast,

Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.

[FR Doc. 95–10340 Filed 4–26–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710–07–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE–95–19]

Petitions for Exemption; Summary of

Petitions Received; Dispositions of

Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for

exemption received and of dispositions

of prior petitions.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking

provisions governing the application,

processing, and disposition of petitions

for exemption (14 CFR Part 11), this

notice contains a summary of certain

petitions seeking relief from specified

requirements of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I),

dispositions of certain petitions

previously received, and corrections.

The purpose of this notice is to improve

the public’s awareness of, and

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s

regulatory activities. Neither publication

of this notice nor the inclusion or

omission of information in the summary

is intended to affect the legal status of

any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received

must identify the petition docket

number involved and must be received

on or before May 17, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any

petition in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the

Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket (AGC–

200), Petition Docket No. llllll,

800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20591.

Comments may also be sent

electronically to the following internet

address: nprmcmts@mail.hq.faa.gov.

The petition, any comments received,

and a copy of any final disposition are

filed in the assigned regulatory docket

and are available for examination in the

Rules Docket (AGC–200), Room 915G,

FAA Headquarters Building (FOB 10A),

800 Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone

(202) 267–3132.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of

Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone (202) 267–7470.

This notice is published pursuant to

paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) of § 11.27 of

Part 11 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Part 11).

Issued in Washington, D.C., on April 21,

1995.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

Docket No.: 124CE

Petitioner: Air Tractor, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

23.562(d)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

certification of the AT–602, which

will have a stall speed (Vso) greater

than the 61-knot requirement.

Docket No.: 27824

Petitioner: Aaron C. Bornstein, M.D.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

61.113(a)(2) and/or 61.131(a)(2)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

Dr. Bornstein to take the written and

practical tests to add a private

rotorcraft category rating to his

commercial pilot certificate without

having logged the required solo flight

time, or to add a commercial pilot

rotorcraft rating to his certificate

without the required pilot-incommand flight time.

Docket No.: 28068

Petitioner: Bombardier, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.211(b)(1)(ii)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

operation of Canadier Global Express

aircraft at altitudes above 41,000 feet

mean sea level without requiring that

at least one pilot at the controls of the

airplane wear an oxygen mask.

Docket No.: 28080

Petitioner: Mr. Joseph J. Hass

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.383(c)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

Mr. Hass to act as a pilot in operations

conducted under part 121 of the FAR

after reaching his 60th birthday.

Docket No.: 28082

Petitioner: Mr. William H. Poarch

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.383(c)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

Mr. Poarch to act as a pilot in

operations conducted under part 121

of the FAR after reaching his 60th

birthday.

Docket No.: 28088

Petitioner: Mark Air, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.481 and 121.483

Description of Relief Sought: To allow

Mark Air, Inc., to conduct all of its

operations under the flight time

limitations and rest requirements for

domestic air carriers instead of the

flight time limitations and rest

requirements for a combination of flag

and domestic air carriers.

Docket No.: 28169

Petitioner: Aviation Technologies, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

141.35(b)(3) and (d)(3)

Description of Relief Sought: To permit

Aviation Technologies, Inc., to

designate Mr. Richard A. Fischer to

serve as chief flight instructor without

meeting certain experience

requirements for such a designation.

Disposition of Petitions

Docket No.: 24187

Petitioner: Florida Department of Law

Enforcement

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.159(a) and 91.209(a) Description of

Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend

Exemption No. 3596, as amended,

which allows the Florida Department

of Law Enforcement relief from the
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 1995 / Notices 20793

pertinent provisions of part 91 of the

FAR in order to conduct drug law

enforcement air support.

Grant, March 30, 1995, Exemption No.

3596E

Docket No.: 26599

Petitioner: Regional Airline Association

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.203

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5515, as amended, which permits

temporary operation of Regional

Airline Association’s U.S.-registered

aircraft in domestic airline operations

without the certificate of

airworthiness or registration, or both,

on board the aircraft.

Grant, April 7, 1995, Exemption No.

5515B

Docket No.: 27142

Petitioner: Horizon Helicopters

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5714, which permits Horizon

Helicopters to operate certain aircraft,

under the provisions of part 135 of the

FAR, without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder.

Grant, April 7, 1995, Exemption No.

5714A

Docket No.: 27220

Petitioner: Mountain Rotors, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.143(c)(2)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To extend Exemption No.

5724, which permits Mountain

Rotors, Inc., to operate certain aircraft,

under the provisions of part 135 of the

FAR, without a TSO–C112 (Mode S)

transponder.

Grant, April 7, 1995, Exemption No.

5724A

Docket No.: 27418

Petitioner: National Business Aircraft

Association, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.299

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit pilots in

command (PIC), employed by

National Business Aircraft

Association, Inc., members, to

complete PIC route and airport checks

in flight simulator rather than in an

aircraft.

Denial, April 4, 1995, Exemption No.

6054

Docket No.: 27909

Petitioner: Professional Airline

Training, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.411(a)(2) and (3) and (b)(2);

121.413(b) and (c); and appendix H of

part 121

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Professional

Airline Training, Inc. (PAT), without

holding an air carrier operating

certificate, to train the certificate

holder’s pilots in initial, upgrade, and

recurrent training. The training would

be conducted in approved simulators

without PAT’s instructor pilots

meeting all applicable training

requirements of subpart N and the

employment requirements of

appendix H of part 121.

Grant, April 4, 1995, Exemption No.

6050

Docket No.: 27945

Petitioner: United Airlines

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

121.133(c)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To allow United Airlines

to utilize electronic digital imaging

and storage technology to prepare

certain maintenance manual

information and instructions for

aircraft operated by United Airlines,

in lieu of printed page form or

microfilm.

Grant, March 24, 1995, Exemption No.

6042

Docket No.: 27990

Petitioner: Eastern Air Charter, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.511(a) and 135.165(b)(5), (6), and

(7)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Eastern Air

Charter, Inc., to operate its Cessna

Citation CE–550 in extended

overwater operations with only one

operative long-range navigational

system (LRNS) and one operative high

frequency communication system

(HF).

Grant, March 31, 1995, Exemption No.

6053

Docket No.: 28039

Petitioner: Grand Air Express, Inc.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.511(a)(2) and 135.165(a)(1) and (6)

and (b)(6) and (7)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Grand Air

Express, Inc., to operate its turbojet

airplanes equipped with on high

frequency communication system

(HF) and one long-range navigation

system (LRNS).

Grant, March 31, 1995, Exemption No.

6051

Docket No.: 28044

Petitioner: CIN–Air, L.P.

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

91.511(a) and 135.165(b)(5), (6), and

(7)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit CIN to operate

its Cessna Citation 500/550/560

aircraft in extended overwater

operations with only one operative

long-range navigational system

(LRNS) and one operative highfrequency communication system

(HF).

Grant, April 6, 1995, Exemption No.

6055

Docket No.: 28049

Petitioner: Merlin Express

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.165(b)(6) and (7)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Merlin Express

to operate turbojet aircraft equipped

with one high frequency

communication system (HF) in

extended overwater operations.

Grant, March 31,1995, Exemption No.

6052

Docket No.: 28117

Petitioner: Executive Airlines

Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR

135.165(b)(6) and (7)

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Executive

Airlines to operate turbojet aircraft

equipped with one high-frequency

(HF) communication system in

extended overwater operations.

Grant, April 4, 1995, Exemption No.

6049

[FR Doc. 95–10387 Filed 4–26–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

Notice of Intent to Rule on Application

to Impose and Use the Revenue From

a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Ford Airport, Iron Mountain, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Rule on

Application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to impose and use the

revenue from a PFC at Ford Airport,

Iron Mountain, Michigan, under the

provisions of the Aviation Safety and

Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title

IX of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Public Law

101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before May 30, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate to the FAA at the following

address: Federal Aviation

Administration, Detroit Airports District

Office, Willow Run Airport, East, 8820

Beck Road, Belleville, Michigan 48111.

In addition, one copy of any

comments submitted to the FAA must