alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575)

Raeon R. Roulston (SBN 255622)

Matthew C. Salmonsen (SBN 302854)

CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.

12 South First Street, Suite 1014

San Jose, California 95113-2418

Telephone Number: (408) 294-6100

Facsimile Number: (408) 294-6190

Email Address: fred.schwinn@sjconsumerlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORLANDO PAUL BARGAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ORLANDO PAUL BARGAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., a Washington 

corporation, and KAYED ASFOUR, 

individually and in his official capacity,

 Defendants.

Case No. 5:17-CV-00606-LHK-NC

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, ORLANDO PAUL BARGAS, by and through his attorney Fred W.

Schwinn of Consumer Law Center, Inc., and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), respectfully notifies

this Court that Plaintiff, ORLANDO PAUL BARGAS, hereby dismisses, with prejudice, all claims

made by him against all Defendants in his Complaint filed herein on February 6, 2017. Plaintiff further

notifies the Court that his dispute with Defendants has been settled.

CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.

Dated: June 21, 2017 By: /s/ Fred W. Schwinn 

Fred W. Schwinn, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORLANDO PAUL BARGAS

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. 5:17-CV-00606-LHK-NC

Case 5:17-cv-00606-LHK Document 24 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 1
Mi nombre es Mariela y mi historia puede cambiar tu vida

Nunca olvidaré ese día. De Debí quedarme en casa, pero me Recuerdo que tocaba la comida Había una familia celebrando el cuarto 

pronto me enfermé en medio sentí mejor. No sabía que llevaba directamente con mis manos pero no cumpleaños de su niño. Su nombre era 

de la noche pero tuve que ir a los gérmenes de mi enfermedad recuerdo si me las había lavado o no. José Antonio. El tenía la sonrisa más 

trabajar al otro día. en las manos. Estaba tan ocupada. hermosa.

A José Antonio le encantaron los nachos Mientras estaba recuperándome en mi casa, el Departamento Si pudiera vivir ese día otra vez, nunca 

que le serví. Una hora más tarde, me fui a de Salud comenzó a recibir informes de todas partes. En hubiera ido a trabajar. Yo también tengo un 

la casa porque me volví a sentir enferma. total, más de 20 personas se enfermaron luego de haber niño y sufro pensando en lo que José Antonio 

Estuve enferma por dos días más. comido en nuestro restaurante. El Departamento de Salud sufrió por mi culpa. 

determino que yo había atendido a todas las personas que se 

enfermaron. Por mi culpa, hasta ese lindo niño que celebraba 

su cumpleaños se enfermó. Yo nunca quiero ser la razón por la 

que alguien se enferme.

Protege a todos. Si estás enfermo, quédate en casa.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

CAROLYN MALONEY, c/o )

Denny Maloney, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-842-PPS-CAN

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW )

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; )

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS )

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY )

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; )

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC’S 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE 

Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC, by counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 7.1, makes the following corporate disclosure: Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC does 

not have any parent corporations and no publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more of 

Alaunus’s stock.

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

Attorneys for Defendants New England 

Compounding Pharmacy Inc.; Alaunus 

Pharmaceutical, LLC; Barry Cadden; Lisa Cadden; 

and Gregory Conigliaro

case 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN document 9 filed 01/04/13 page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on January 4, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY

1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, Indiana 46515

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\14 - Maloney\Federal Court Action\Corporate Disclosure_Alaunus.docx

case 3:12-cv-00842-PPS-CAN document 9 filed 01/04/13 page 2 of 2
Norberto AQUINO-LOPEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10096.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
For more information on health equity, visit www.fda.gov/healthequity. 

People living with HIV take a combination of HIV 

medications, known as antiretroviral therapy or ART,

every day.

WHAT IS HIV?

Human immunodefıciency virus (HIV) is a chronic disease that attacks the body’s

immune system. 

HIV medications lower the chances of spreading HIV.

HIV medications can’t cure HIV, but they can help people

living with HIV live longer, healthier lives.

THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT 3 HIV TREATMENT
For more information on health equity, visit www.fda.gov/healthequity. 

WHAT IS PREP & IS IT RIGHT FOR YOU?

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a method of 

preventing HIV infection by taking daily HIV medications. 

WHAT IS HIV?

Human immunodefıciency virus (HIV) is a chronic disease that attacks the body’s

immune system. 

PrEP is prescribed to HIV-negative adults and adolescents

who are at high risk for getting HIV through sex or injection 

drug use.

PrEP is only available by prescription. If you think PrEP may 

be right for you, talk to your health care provider or go to 

PrEPLocator.org to fınd a provider in your area.

PrEP lowers the chances of getting HIV from sex by about 

99% when taken daily. Among people who inject drugs, 

PrEP lowers the chances of getting HIV by more than 70%.
Charles Jerome ADAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9275.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*1850Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IMPORTANT: Attach copy of opinion or order appealed from. Forward together with copy of 

notice of appeal and certified docket entries

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Appeal Information Sheet

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. 

PLAINTIFF(S) DEFENDANT(S)

(List all parties. Use asterisk to indicate dismissed or withdrawn parties. Use separate sheet if 

needed. Explain any discrepancy with caption used on judgment, order or opinion.)

Type of case: Civil (Patent)

Docket No. 17-939 WHA Date of Judgment/Order: June 21, 2017

Cross or related appeal? Date of Notice of Appeal: June 23, 2017

Appellant is: ( ) Plaintiff ( ) Defendant ( x ) Other (explain)

Non Party

DOCKET FEE STATUS:

( x) Paid ( ) Not Paid Billed On: 

U.S. Appeal? Yes (x ) No ( )

In forma pauperis? 

( ) Granted ( ) Denied ( ) Revoked ( ) Pending ( x ) Never 

requested

COUNSEL (List name, firm, address and telephone of lead counsel for each party. Indicate 

party represented.): for Non Party Anthony Levandowski

Attorney Ismail Ramsey izzy@ramsey-ehrlich.com

Ramsey & Ehrlich LLP

803 Hearst Avenue

Berkeley, CA 94710

510 548-3600

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 732 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 2
IMPORTANT: Attach copy of opinion or order appealed from. Forward together with copy of 

notice of appeal and certified docket entries

COURT REPORTER: (Name and telephone)

Jo Ann Bryce 510 910-5888

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 732 Filed 06/26/17 Page 2 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CALIFORNIA PARENTS FOR THE 

EQUALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL 

MATERIALS, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TOM TORLAKSON, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 17-cv-00635-CRB 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

STAY AND RECONSIDER 

On January 31, 2019, this Court issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ administrative 

motions to file under seal communications among the members of the South Asia Faculty 

Group (SAFG) that Judge Corley had designated confidential during pretrial discovery. 

See Order (dkt. 229). The Court held that the “compelling reasons” standard applies, and 

that the documents do not meet that standard. Id. The Court further held that, while the 

Regents of the University of California sought to submit additional briefing, “the Court 

finds it unnecessary to receive additional briefing on the matter.” Id. at 4 n.3. The 

Regents have now filed a motion to stay the Court’s January 31, 2019 order and to grant 

the Regents leave to file a motion for reconsideration of that order. See Mot. (dkt. 232). 

Plaintiffs oppose the motion. See Opp’n (dkt. 233). 

There is little point in staying the Court’s order. The order has been in effect for 

nearly two weeks, Plaintiffs promptly posted the SAFG documents on their website, see 

Gherini Decl. (dkt. 232-1) ¶ 2, and the documents have been publicly available on the 

Court’s docket for a week, see Notice of Filing Unredacted Versions of Documents 

Previously Submitted Under Seal (dkt. 231). Staying the order at this point would not put 

Case 3:17-cv-00635-CRB Document 235 Filed 02/13/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:17-cv-00635-CRB Document 235 Filed 02/13/19 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1359 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1359

 To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend the pilot 
             program for alternative water source projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2005

Mr. Davis of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend the pilot 
             program for alternative water source projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM FOR ALTERNATIVE WATER SOURCE PROJECTS.

    Section 220(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1300(j)) is amended in the first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``$75,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$125,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``2002 through 2004'' and inserting ``2006 
        through 2010''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KUTCHEV PIERRE, )

a/k/a KUTCHEV CELESTIAL PIERRE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-50

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 7, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Christine Greider, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

WALTER HENDERSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00834-HRL 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 

SETTLEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 30

The court having been informed that this case has settled, all previously scheduled 

deadlines and appearances are vacated.

On or before April 12, 2018, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(a). If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear in 

Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, 

California on April 24, 2018, 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why the case should not be 

dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Additionally, the parties shall file a statement in 

response to this Order to Show Cause no later than April 17, 2018 advising as to (1) the status of 

the activities of the parties in finalizing settlement; and (2) how much additional time, if any, is 

requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the 

Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

statement in response to this Order.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2018

Howard R. Lloyd

United States Magistrate Judge
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF PIONEER SOUTHWEST ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Richard P. Dealy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Natural Resources GP LLC, the general partner of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the            Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of that section.

 

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

|   |   |                                       |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ Richard P. Dealy                       |   |
|   | Name:  | Richard P. Dealy, Executive Vice President |   |
|   |   | and Chief Financial Officer                |   |
|   |   |                                       |   |
|   | Date:  | March 5, 2009                         |   |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11022]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title; Applicable Form; and OMB Control Number: Health-Related 
Survey--Individual Facility Report; DA Form 4723-2-R; OMB Control 
Number 0704-0175.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 1,035.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,035.
    Average Burden per Responses: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,035.
    Needs and Uses: The information collected hereby, provides the 
Department of the Army with the data necessary to identify appropriate 
facilities, and to assign Army personnel to areas where services are 
available for exceptional family members.
    Affected Public: State or local governments; Businesses or other 
for-profit, and Non-profit institutions.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-11022 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-P-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1 3:17-cv-00690-WHO

SCOTT GERIEN (State Bar No. 184728)

sgerien@dpf-law.com

JOY L. DURAND (State Bar No. 245413)

jdurand@dpf-law.com

DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY

1455 First Street, Suite 301

Napa, California 94559

Telephone: (707) 252-7122

Facsimile: (707) 255-6876

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JAM CELLARS, INC.

ROBERT C. HOLTZAPPLE (State Bar No. 145954)

rholtzapple@fbm.com

KELLY M. MATAYOSHI (State Bar No. 284596)

kmatayoshi@fbm.com

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 954-4400

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480

Attorneys for Defendant

O’NEILL BEVERAGES CO. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JaM Cellars, Inc.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

O’Neill Beverages Co. LLC,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00690-WHO

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE; ORDER

 The parties in this action have entered into a settlement agreement resolving the 

dispute. As part of the settlement agreement Defendant is required to change its product 

packaging to feature a new label for use with the trademark at issue in this dispute. The parties 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2 3:17-cv-00690-WHO

have agreed that the new label is an acceptable mechanism to address Plaintiff’s concerns 

related to the trademark infringement claims asserted in this matter. However, before 

Defendant can utilize this new label, the new label must be approved by state and federal 

agencies that regulate the alcohol beverage industry. 

 Accordingly, the parties stipulate that this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and 

any hearings scheduled in this matter be VACATED, but if any party certifies to this Court, with 

proper notice to opposing counsel prior to July 1, 2018, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this 

order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

Respectfully Submitted, 

Dated: January 15, 2018 DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY 

/s/ J. Scott Gerien 

J. Scott Gerien 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

JAM CELLARS, INC. 

Dated: January 15, 2018 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 

/s/ Robert C. Holtzapple 

Robert C. Holtzapple 

Attorneys for Defendant, 

O’NEILL BEVERAGES CO. LLC 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

3 3:17-cv-00690-WHO

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 17, 2018 __________________________________________

HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Floyd A. SMITH, petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA.

No. 12-8747.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
Exhibit 3

FILED UNDER SEAL

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1086-3 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 1
SSO B ja lat ALE Cf gla aie Agatdal) Gl ga) pladius) 9) oo) JUN hi LL
DLS Aadlug pldet) dadlu le Lilad utils

plsdciael gf Cul LAAN efaty) (te Laila Gea yal y «yal pels Alay) Cpe Quitill dylan (8 ada:
DA ASU 8 alal AQkE9) glai sic Agubduall Cul gs!
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Total Nutraceutical Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Marvin S. Hausman, M.D. Acting Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Dated:  June 28, 2011

By:  /s/ Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

       Marvin S. Hausman, M.D.

 

       Acting Principal Accounting and Financial Officer 

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
2AO 154 (10/03) Substitution of Attorney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

District of

CONSENT ORDER GRANTING

Plaintiff (s), SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

V.

CASE NUMBER:

Defendant (s),

Notice is hereby given that, subject to approval by the court, substitutes

(Party (s) Name)

, State Bar No. as counsel of record in

(Name of New Attorney)

place of .

(Name of Attorney (s) Withdrawing Appearance)

Contact information for new counsel is as follows:

Firm Name:

Address:

Telephone: Facsimile

E-Mail (Optional):

I consent to the above substitution.

Date:

(Signature of Party (s))

I consent to being substituted.

Date:

(Signature of Former Attorney (s))

I consent to the above substitution.

Date:

(Signature of New Attorney) 

The substitution of attorney is hereby approved and so ORDERED.

Date:

Judge

[Note: A separate consent order of substitution must be filed by each new attorney wishing to enter an appearance.]

Northern California

Waymo LLC

Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

Stroz Friedberg, LLC

Melanie M. Blunschi 234264

Robert B. Ellis and Kevin K. Chang, Kirkland & Ellis LLP

Latham & Watkins LLP

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000

(415) 391-0600 (415) 395-8095

8/15/2017

8/15/2017

8/15/2017

/s/ Scott Brown

/s/ Robert B. Ellis

/s/ Kevin K. Chang

/s/ Melanie M. Blunschi

August 15, 2017.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1218 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 1