alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * DOCKET NO. 17-CR-93

 

VERSUS *

 

MARCUS ETIENNE AND * JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP

ELIZABETH GOBERT

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

STIPULATION

NOW INTO COURT, comes defendant, ELIZABETH GOBERT through undersigned 

counsel, who respectfully represents to this Honorable Court the following:

1.

A Status Conference is set for Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. for this matter.

2.

Undersigned Counsel has a recently occurring scheduling conflict the resetting of which 

would be difficult, if at all possible.

3.

The proposed continuance of the aforementioned Status Conference has been discussed 

with Assistant U. S. Attorney William Frentzen and Mr. Darryl Stallworth, counsel for Marcus 

Etienne, and they both agree to the conference being continued.

 4.

Undersigned Counsel requests this matter be rescheduled to May 16, 2017 as agreed upon 

by all parties, and with the understanding that said date is available, and amenable, to the Court.

 5. 

Order re:
2

This motion is not meant to unduly delay the proceedings, and will have no such affect.

Respectfully submitted,

DORAN & CAWTHORNE, PLLC

 /s/ Pride J. Doran, # 25035

 pride@doranlawfirm.com

521 East Landry Street (70570)

Post Office Box 2119

Opelousas, LA 70571

Phone: (337) 948-8008

Fax: (337) 948-0098

Attorney for Elizabeth Gobert 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of this pleading was filed electronically with the Clerk of Court 

using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all counsel of record by operation of 

the Court’s electronic filing system this 10

th

day of April, 2017.

/s/ PRIDE J. DORAN, # 25035

 pride@doranlawfirm.com
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * DOCKET NO. 17-CR-93

 

VERSUS *

 

MARCUS ETIENNE AND * JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP

ELIZABETH GOBERT

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER

Considering the foregoing Stipulation: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Status Conference previously scheduled for 2:00 p.m., on April 25, 

2017 is hereby upset and rescheduled for 2:00 p.m. on May 16, 2017. 

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at ________________, California on this _____ day of 

_______________, 2017.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

San Francisco April
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of California

Synopsys, Inc.

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., UBIQUITI

NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, CHINGHAN TSAI, and DOES 1-20

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., UBIQUITI NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,

CHING-HAN TSAI, and DOES 1-20

Denise M. Mingrone

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

1000 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, California 94025

Phone: (650) 614-7400; Fax: (650) 614-7401

Case 5:17-cv-00561-NC Document 2 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

" I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

" I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

" I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

" I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

" Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 5:17-cv-00561-NC Document 2 Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 2
John BAILEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is transferred.
STEP 1

Announcement closes. HR 

Specialist reviews resumes 

and supporting 

documentation.

STEP 2

HR Specialist 

rates and ranks 

applications 

against predetermined 

criteria.

STEP 3

HR Specialist refers applicants 

with the highest rating as bestqualified, then notifies all the 

candidates of their referral/nonreferral status. 

STEP 4

Hiring manager 

reviews application 

and determines who 

they would like to 

interview. STEP 5

Hiring manager conducts 

interviews and checks 

candidates’ references. STEP 6

Hiring manager makes a 

selection and returns list to the 

HR Specialist.

STEP 7

HR Specialist makes 

the tentative job offer 

to the candidate. The 

candidate accepts or 

declines the position 

and provides desired 

start date. 

STEP 8

Selected 

candidate 

completes 

required security 

documents in eQuip system. STEP 9

FDA Security Office 

completes background 

investigation of 

selected candidate. STEP 10

Employee enters on 

duty (EOD) and begins 

their rewarding career 

with FDA.

You’ve 

submitted an 

application on 

USA Jobs, 

now what?

IMPORTANT REMINDERS

@FDAJobs FDA

• It is extremely important to 

carefully read the entire job 

announcement and ensure all 

required documentation is 

submitted. 

• Be patient, the job application 

and hiring process has many 

steps and can be lengthy.

• Ensure your resume has up-todate contact information on it 

so hiring managers & HR can 

easily reach you.

• HR should be your first point of 

contact for questions, and are the 

only authorized personnel to 

formally offer you an official 

position and provide you details 

about on-boarding. 

This document was created by FDA/OTS/SSOB. Do not edit any content. 

For recruitment and informational use only.
Order entered July 24, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01033-CV

DEMETRA JEFFERSON WYSINGER FOR AND AS POA FOR DEMONDRIA 

JEFFERSON, TYSWAYLA MITCHELL, PRINCE LOUIS WYSINGER AND MINOR 

CHILDREN, Appellant

V.

GEICO COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, FARMERS INSURANCE, AND RON 

MONTGOMERY MOTORS, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00628-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 23, 2018 motion for an additional extension of time 

to file reply brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than August 

22, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-3 (the "Exchange
    Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
    provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Cenlar, FSB as Sub-Servicer for Thornburg Mortgage Home Loans Inc., Colonial
    Savings, F.A. as Servicer, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer,
    Dovenmuehle Mortgage Company as Sub-Servicer for Mellon Trust of New
    England, First Horizon Home Loan Corporation as Servicer, First Republic
    Bank as Servicer, Mellon Trust of New England as Named Servicer, Morgan
    Stanley Credit Corporation as Servicer and named Servicer for Saxon Mortgage
    Services, Inc, Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. as Sub-Servicer for Morgan
    Stanley Credit Corporation, Thornburg Mortgage Home Loans Inc. as Named
    Servicer for Cenlar, FSB.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SinoHub, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), De Hai Li , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  March 30, 2012
By:
/s/ De Hai LiDe Hai LiChief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00420-CR

Sean Patrick Bunker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 453RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. CR-17-0391-C, THE HONORABLE DAVID JUNKIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Sean Patrick Bunker’s brief was originally due November 16, 2020. On February 

23, 2021, this Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a 

failure to file a satisfactory response by March 18, 2021, would result in the referral of this case 

to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. To 

date, no appellant’s brief has been filed.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct 

a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether 

counsel has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make 

appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the 

court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. 

Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate
2

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to be prepared 

and forwarded to this Court no later than April 21, 2021. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).

It is so ordered March 19, 2021.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Abated and Remanded

Filed: March 19, 2021

Do Not Publish
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 764 

Designating September 2022, as ‘‘National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2022, as ‘‘National Spinal Cord 

Injury Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas approximately 299,000 individuals in the United 

States live with spinal cord injuries, which cost society 

billions of dollars in health care costs and lost wages; 

Whereas there are approximately 18,000 new spinal cord injuries in the United States each year; 

Whereas more than 42,000 individuals with spinal cord injuries are veterans; 

Whereas motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries; 

Whereas nearly half of all spinal cord injuries to individuals 

30 years of age or younger occur as a result of a motor 

vehicle accident; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 764 ATS 

Whereas the average remaining years of life for individuals 

living with spinal cord injuries has not improved significantly since the 1980s; 

Whereas there is an urgent need to develop new 

neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and 

Whereas increased education and investment in research are 

key factors in improving outcomes for individuals living 

with spinal cord injuries, enhancing the quality of life of 

individuals with spinal cord injuries, and ultimately curing paralysis: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2022, as ‘‘National 

3 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

5 Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month; 

6 (3) continues to support research to find better 

7 treatments, therapies, and a cure for spinal cord in8 juries; 

9 (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies 

10 that offer promise and hope to individuals living 

11 with paralysis; and 

12 (5) commends the dedication of national, re13 gional, and local organizations, researchers, doctors, 

14 volunteers, and people across the United States who 

15 are working to improve the quality of life of individVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:21 Sep 14, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR764.ATS SR764

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 764 ATS 

1 uals living with spinal cord injuries and their fami2 lies. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1




                        [ALPHA VIRTUAL, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In Connection with the quarterly  report of Alpha Virtual,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  30,  2002 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Saif
Mansour,  President  of the  Company,  certify,  to the  best  of my  knowledge,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in  all  material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








                             /s/ Saif Mansour
                             --------------------------------
                             Saif Mansour
                             President
                             Alpha Virtual, Inc.

                             February 14, 2002













                                     99.1-1
February 20, 2015



Scandium International Mining Corp. (formerly EMC Metals Corp.)
1430 Greg Street, Suite 501
Sparks, NV 89431



|Re: | Scandium International Mining Corp. (the “Company”)
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 10K                          



Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”).



We hereby consent to the references to our
firm and to the summary of the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 F1 Technical Report on the Feasibility of the Nyngan
Scandium Project”, dated October 10, 2014 prepared by Larpro Pty Ltd., which appear in the Annual Report and the incorporation
therein of such references to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-179657).



Yours truly,



/s/ Nigel Ricketts___________________________________
Nigel Ricketts, MAusIMM CP (Metallurgy)
Technical Director, Altrius Engineering Services
Timothy McGLOTHIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9854.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Bruce HOWARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D19-519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 15, 2019

Bruce Howard, Florida City, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Bruce Howard, seeks habeas corpus relief regarding his 1987 upward departure sentence for second-degree murder. We deny the petition on the merits because the record before us shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial judge would have imposed the same upward departure sentence based on the valid reasons previously given, even without consideration of the one arguably invalid factor first determined when Howard was sentenced. *See* *Albritton v. State* , 476 So.2d 158, 160 (Fla. 1985). Further, we conclude that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by the extent of the departure. *See id.*

Petitioner has repeatedly challenged his upward departure sentence in this court. He is therefore cautioned that any further pro se filings in this court asserting claims stemming from his conviction and sentence in case number 84-3221-BB, Circuit Court, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Volusia County, Florida, may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture *170of gain time. *See* *State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47, 48-49 (Fla. 1999) ; § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018).

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED.

BERGER, LAMBERT, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6154

PATRICK EDWIN RUDD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, CUMBERLAND; WARDEN HENRY; CAPTAIN EY; LIEUTENANT THOMPSON;MR. CROSS, Unit Manager; MR. PERDUE, Counselor; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION-ELKTON; WARDEN LAMANNA; CAPTAIN BRIGGS; DIXON, I.S.M.C.; LIEUTENANT HOAGLUND, Respondents - Appellees.

_________________________ R. E. WASHINGTON, Movant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98- 3737-AMD) Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on December 9, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on December 10, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 Patrick Edwin Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Patrick Edwin Rudd appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rudd v. FCI Cumberland , No. CA-98-3737-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 10, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.8


Consent of Independent Auditors





The Board of Directors


Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.:


We consent to the use of our report dated March 28, 2014, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of KWVF Panther Holdco Limited as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the period then ended, incorporated by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-174742, No. 333-175002, No. 333-175559, No. 333-184752, and No. 333-192059) on Form S-3, the registration statements (No. 333-164928, No. 333-182269, and No. 333-197492) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-164926) on Form S-1/A and the registration statement (No. 333-186690) on Form S-4 of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. in reliance upon the report of KPMG, independent auditors, which report appears in amendment no. 1 to the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10-K of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.








/s/ KPMG


Dublin, Ireland


March 27, 2015