alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0611

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

RANDALL PATRICK ATKINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 7 2023

06/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0611
Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 12 PageID 180
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 12 PageID 181
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 3 of 12 PageID 182
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 4 of 12 PageID 183
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 5 of 12 PageID 184
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 6 of 12 PageID 185
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 7 of 12 PageID 186
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 8 of 12 PageID 187
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 9 of 12 PageID 188
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 10 of 12 PageID 189
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 11 of 12 PageID 190
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01754-P Document 22 Filed 01/18/06 Page 12 of 12 PageID 191
Joseph Kelly ILEN-OTUMA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10022.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.2




Southwest Bank of St. Louis

St. Louis Commercial Lending

Mr. Robert Witterschein

13205 Manchester Rd

Des Peres, Missouri 63131




February 6, 2009




Dear Mr. Witterschein:



In respect to the Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of May 11, 2001 and as amended,
between Southwest Bank of St. Louis (the “Bank”) and Zoltek Companies, Inc., Zoltek Corporation,
Engineering Technology Corporation, and Zoltek Properties, Inc., (collectively, the “Borrowers”),
the Bank hereby confirms the following via execution below:




	 	•	 	The Bank hereby waives compliance with financial covenants contained in Section 6.03 of
the Agreement. Such waiver is effective from and including Janaury 2, 2008 through all
covenant testing dates prior to and including December 31, 2008.






	 	•	 	Section 6.03—Specific Financial Covenants of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety effective January 1, 2009.






	 	•	 	The applicable definition set forth in Section 1.01 of the Agreement is hereby deleted
and replaced with the following:






Borrowing Base — At any date of determination, an amount equal to: (i) eighty
percent (80%) of the face amount of Eligible Accounts outstanding at such date;
plus (ii) the Eligible Inventory Advance Amount; minus (iii) the
aggregate undrawn face amount of all outstanding letters of credit issued by the Bank
for the account of any one or more of the Borrowers (excluding the Appeal Bond Letter of
Credit). In no event, however, shall the amount advanced by the Bank pursuant to the
Borrowing Base exceed Ten Million and no/100 Dollars ($10,000,000.00).




	 	•	 	Section 3.02 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
following:






Term of Revolving Credit Facility — Subject to the Bank’s right to cease making
Loans to the Borrowers at any time upon or after the occurrence and during the
continuation of any Default or Event of Default, the Borrowers shall be entitled to
request advances under the Revolving Credit Note for the period from the date hereof to
and including January 1, 2010 (the “Revolving Loan Maturity Date”). In no event may the
Borrowers terminate this Agreement until the Borrowers have repaid all Loans and
otherwise paid and performed their Obligations hereunder. All indemnities given by the
Borrowers to the Bank under any of the Loan Documents shall survive the repayment of the
Loans and the termination of the Agreement.



Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.



Sincerely,




/s/ Andrew W. Whipple




Andrew W. Whipple

Chief Accounting Officer



Cc: Zsolt Rumy




Acknowledgement by Southwest Bank of St. Louis:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signed:

	 	/s/ Robert Witterschein
	 	Dated:
	 	2/9/09
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Print Name:

	 	Robert Witterschein
	 	Title:
	 	President
Xa U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION

April 24, 2018

Carlo de Notaristefani

Executive Vice President, Teva Global Operations
400 Interpace Pkwy, Building A

Parsippany, NJ 07054

Dear Mr. de Notaristefani:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is pleased to announce that Teva is selected to receive a Drug
Shortage Assistance Award for its role in preventing or alleviating a drug shortage.

Teva is being recognized for its efforts related to the prevention of a shortage of Trisenox (arsenic trioxide)
injection, including building an inventory of product, allowing continued availability of product for
patients.

FDA established this award program to recognize companies for making a substantial contribution to
preventing or alleviating a drug shortage. FDA hopes this award serves as an incentive for other companies
to assist in addressing drug shortages, as Teva has.

The intent of the award program is to bring attention to manufacturers or companies that assist in
addressing a drug shortage and prioritize quality manufacturing, a key component of the Strategic Plan for
Preventing and Mitigating Drug Shortages. More information on the strategic plan can be found on FDA’s
drug shortages web page (http://www. fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/drugshortages/default.htm).

FDA thanks Teva for working to prevent the shortage of Trisenox. The enclosed press release/web
statement template is provided to assist you in publicizing your award from FDA.

Sincerely,

(a
ke (ch Luh ff

Deputy Center Director for Regulatory Programs,
FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

Enclosure(s):
Certificate
Optional Press Release/Web Statement Template

U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20903
www.fda.gov
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 5, 2015

No. 04-14-00480-CV

STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF J.B., As a 

Mentally Ill Person,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-MH-2140

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The above cause has been set for formal submission ON BRIEFS ONLY before this 

Court on February 26, 2015, before a panel consisting of Justice Alvarez, Justice Chapa, and 

Justice Pulliam.

It is so ORDERED on this 5th day of February, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Attested to:_______________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 5

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 23-7 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
INCLUDED IN PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,729
<PP&E>                                          28,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,755
<BONDS>                                         10,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,352
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,876
<SALES>                                         43,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,803
<CGS>                                           24,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1243 

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to provide for reciprocity 

in regard to the manner in which nonresidents of a State may carry 

certain concealed firearms in that State. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Mr. HOSTETTLER (for himself, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. SESSIONS, 

Mr. WICKER, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. WAMP, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. GOODE, 

Mr. SOUDER, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. PENCE, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. HALL, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. CANNON, Mr. 

ADERHOLT, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BRADLEY of New Hampshire, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. FOLEY, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. CANTOR, Mrs. 

MUSGRAVE, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. OTTER, 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. 

SODREL, and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to provide 

for reciprocity in regard to the manner in which nonresidents of a State may carry certain concealed firearms 

in that State. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1243 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Access to Fire3 arms Enhancement (SAFE) Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. RECIPROCITY FOR THE CARRYING OF CERTAIN 

5 CONCEALED FIREARMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 44 of title 18, United 

7 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 926A 

8 the following: 

9 ‘‘§ 926D. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain con10 cealed firearms 

11 ‘‘Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any 

12 State or political subdivision thereof, a person who is not 

13 prohibited by Federal law from possessing, transporting, 

14 shipping, or receiving a firearm, and is— 

15 ‘‘(1) carrying a valid license or permit which is 

16 issued pursuant to the law of any State and which 

17 permits the person to carry a concealed firearm; or 

18 ‘‘(2) otherwise entitled to carry a concealed fire19 arm in and pursuant to the law of the State of the 

20 person’s residence, 

21 may carry in any State a concealed firearm in accordance 

22 with the terms of the license or with the laws of the State 

23 of the person’s residence, subject to the laws of the State 

24 in which the firearm is carried concerning specific types 

25 of locations in which firearms may not be carried.’’. 
3 

•HR 1243 IH 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for chapter 44 of title 18 is amended by inserting after 

3 the item relating to section 926C the following: 

‘‘926D. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 The provisions of this Act and the amendments made 

6 by this Act shall take effect 180 days after the date of 

7 enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of ConsultAmerica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
A. Sundberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Edward A. Sundberg
   -------------------
    Edward A. Sundberg
    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
    April 19, 2005
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LAMALSIKOU LOWE, Petitioner,
vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 70262 

# FILED
JUN 1 6 2016

C K. LINDEMAN

au _I Le:F di a -

A CMI FDEAER 

### ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the validity of a judgment of conviction. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. 

### See NRAP 22. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

.---4 Douglas CLE

BY

v u , J. Gibbons

cc: Lamalsikou Lowe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk



# i co-lca g ap (0) 1947A
Eddy LEAL, P.A., Appellant, v. Orlando BENITEZ, Jr., Appellee.

No. 3D18-1541

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019

Eddy Leal, P.A., and Eddy Leal, for appellant.

León Cosgrove, LLP, and Scott B. Cosgrove, Miami and Jeremy L. Kahn, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

MILLER J.

Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate any abuse of discretion by the lower tribunal in denying its motion for continuance of the evidentiary hearing upon its charging lien. *See**Stern v. Four Freedoms Nat'l Med. Servs., Co.*, 417 So. 2d 1085, 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) ("The granting or denying of a motion for continuance is within the discretion of the trial judge and a gross or flagrant abuse of this discretion must be demonstrated by the complaining party before this court will substitute its judgment for that of the trial judge.") (quoting *Edwards v. Pratt*, 335 So. 2d 597, 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) ); *see**also**Fisher v. Perez*, 947 So. 2d 648, 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (In addition to the requirements imposed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.460, a party seeking a motion for continuance due to the unavailability of a witness must show: "(1) prior due diligence *775to obtain the witness's presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would have been forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice.") (quoting *State v. J.G.*, 740 So. 2d 84, 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ).1

Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

1

Here, the lack of prejudice is particularly evident, as appellant is actively pursuing an authorized, alternative remedy. *See**Attias v. Faroy Realty Co.*, 609 So. 2d 105, 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) ("We know of no rule which prevents the attorney from abandoning the charging lien and proceeding against the former clients on ordinary contract principles.").
Robert Edward TORRES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9931.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1.


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, C.
Eugene Gronning, Chief Executive Officer, and C. Eugene Gronning, Principal
Accounting Officer, of PMI Construction Group (the "Registrant") do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon
a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period December 31, 2008 of
the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:  April
6,
2009                                                      By:  /s/ C. Eugene
Gronning


C. Eugene
Gronning


Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Accounting


Officer





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PMI Construction Group and will be retained by PMI Construction
Group and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11248]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Task Force on the Future of the NSF Supercomputer Centers 
Program; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Task Force on the Future of the NSF Supercomputer Centers 
Program (#1982).
    Date & Time: May 22, 1995 1:00-5:00 pm, and May 23 from 8:00 am-
noon.
    Place: Skybird Conference Center, O'Hare International Airport, 
Chicago IL.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Robert Borchers, Director, Division of 
Advanced Scientific Computing, Directorate for Computer and 
Information Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, 703/306-1970.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Meeting Purpose: The objective of the Task Force is to advise 
the NSF on the future of its Supercomputing Centers Program 
considering the changing nature of computing and information science 
and technology. Its scope will be limited to NSF's support for 
advanced computational science. This meeting is to seek advice and 
testimony from representatives of academic and government leaders in 
High Performance Computing, and some principal investigators of 
Grand Challenge Projects. The task force will continue its 
discussions on the principles to be used in evaluating the options 
of any future programs, and hear reports on visits of members to the 
four existing NSF Supercomputer Centers.

Agenda

May 22, 1995
    1:00-500 Advice and testimony from members of the High 
Performance Computing Community.
May 23, 1995
    9:00-3:00 Advice and testimony from members of the High 
Performance Computing Community

    Reason for Late Notice: Difficulty with scheduling witnesses.

    Dated: May 3, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11248 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Amendend and Restated Compensation policy for Non-Employee Directors



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc. 
 Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors 
 (Effective November 17, 2008) 
 Objective 

 It is the objective of Mercury to compensate non-employee directors in a manner which will enable recruitment and retention of highly
qualified directors and fairly compensate them for their services as a director. 
 Cash Compensation 
  

			
		
	 Annual retainer for non-employee directors:
	  	$55,000 per annum, paid quarterly
		
	 Additional annual retainers:
	  	
		
	 (a) Independent Chairman:
	  	$25,000 per annum, paid quarterly
		
	 (b) Chairman of the Audit Committee:
	  	$15,000 per annum, paid quarterly
		
	 (c) Chairman of the Compensation Committee:
	  	$12,000 per annum, paid quarterly
		
	 (d) Chairman of the N&G Committee:
	  	$6,000 per annum, paid quarterly

 Directors are entitled to be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses incurred in connection with
attendance at Board and committee meetings. 
 Quarterly retainer payments shall be paid in arrears within 30 days following the end of each
quarter, with the first payments under this policy to be made in January 2009 with respect to service during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. 
 Equity Compensation 
 New non-employee directors will be granted stock options to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock in
connection with their first election to the Board. These awards will vest as to 50% of the covered shares on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant, and will expire on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. 
 Non-employee directors may also receive annual stock option awards at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Beginning with fiscal year 2007,
non-employee directors will receive annual stock option awards covering 16,000 shares. These awards will vest as to 50% of the covered shares on the date of grant and as to the remaining covered shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant,
and will expire on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant. Non-employee directors will not be eligible to receive the annual stock option award for the fiscal year in which they are first elected. Non-employee directors who are first elected
to the Board during the first half of Company’s fiscal year will be eligible to receive the annual stock option award for the next fiscal year; otherwise, non-employee directors will not be eligible to receive their first annual stock option
award until the second fiscal year following the fiscal year in which they are first elected to the Board. 
 Approved by the Board of Directors, as amended,
on November 17, 2008
Gary PEARLMAN, Appellant, v. Michael BORGIA, Appellee.

No. 1D19-1563

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 29, 2019

Gary Pearlman, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*1283Upon consideration of Appellant's response to the Court's order of June 19, 2019, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final and the appeal is premature because the order merely grants a motion and does not contain the requisite words of finality to make it an order entering a final appealable judgment. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(*l* ) ; *Hickox v. Taylor* , 933 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant's request for clarification is denied.

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.