Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 1995 / Notices 21513

Southern states that copies of the

filing will be served upon its shippers

and interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, NE., Washington,

DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

Sections 385.211 and 385.214). All such

motions and protests should be filed on

or before May 3, 1995. Protests will not

be considered by the Commission in

determining the parties to the

proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10682 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Project No. 2964, Michigan]

City of Sturgis, Michigan; Notice of

Intent To File an Application for a New

License

April 26, 1995.

Take notice that the City of Sturgis,

Michigan, the existing licensee for the

Sturgis Hydroelectric Project No. 2964,

filed a timely notice of intent to file an

application for a new license, pursuant

to 18 CFR 16.6 of the Commission’s

Regulations. The original license for

Project No. 2964 was issued effective

April 14, 1961, and expires March 31,

2000.

The project is located on the St.

Joseph River in St. Joseph County,

Michigan. The principal works of the

Sturgis Project include a dam with a

concrete section 300 feet long and 25

feet high and an earth section 500 feet

long with an average height of 12.5 feet;

a reservoir with a surface area of 480

acres at elevation 825.5 feet m.s.l.; two

powerhouses with a total installed

capacity of 2,600 kW; a 24–kV

transmission substation and a 24–kV

transmission line, about 18 miles long,

extending to a substation in Sturgis; and

appurtenant facilities.

Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.7, the licensee

is required henceforth to make available

certain information to the public. This

information is now available from the

licensee at 130 North Nottawa, Sturgis,

MI 49091.

Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.8, 16.9 and

16.10, each application for a new

license and any competing license

applications must be filed with the

Commission at least 24 months prior to

the expiration of the existing license.

All applications for license for this

project must be filed by March 31, 1998.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10681 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–244–000]

Williams Natural Gas Co.; Notice of

Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 26, 1995.

Take notice that on April 21, 1995,

Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG)

tendered for filing to become part of its

FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet

No. 240. The proposed effective date of

these tariff sheets is May 4, 1995.

WNG states that the purpose for the

instant filing is to comply with the

Commission’s order in Docket No.

RM95–5 issued March 29, 1995. Second

Revised Sheet No. 240 includes

revisions to Article 11 of WNG’s FERC

Gas Tariff to provide that releases for a

period of one month or less will be

considered short term releases, and

releases for more than one month are

long term releases. It also provides that

long term pre-arranged releases at the

maximum rate will be exempted from

the advance posting and bidding

requirements.

WNG states that a copy of its filing

was served on all jurisdictional

customers and interested state

commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of

the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before

May 3, 1995. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10683 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Issuance of Decisions and

Orders During the Week of April 3

Through April 7, 1995

During the week of April 3 through

April 7, 1995 the decisions and orders

summarized below were issued with

respect to applications for relief filed

with the Office of Hearings and Appeals

of the Department of Energy. The

following summary also contains a list

of submissions that were dismissed by

the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Personnel Security Hearing

Albuquerque Operations Office, 4/4/95,

VSO–0012

An OHA Hearing Officer issued an

opinion restoring the access

authorization and PSAP authorization of

a Respondent. The Respondent’s

authorizations had been suspended

when it was discovered that he had

once smoked marijuana. The Hearing

Officer found that the Respondent’s

youth was a significant factor in his

decision to engage in an experimental

use of marijuana. In addition, the

Hearing Officer found that the

Respondent had shown adequate

rehabilitation and growth in his sense of

responsibility since the incident.

Refund Applications

Dalco Petroleum/Farmland Industries

Inc., et al., 4/3/95, RF248–8 et al.

The DOE issued a Supplemental

Decision and Order concerning four

Applications for Refund filed by

purchasers of propane from Dalco

Petroleum Inc. In an earlier Decision,

the applicants were granted refunds

from monies collected from Dalco

pursuant to the terms of a consent order

with DOE. Recently, Dalco made a

supplemental payment to the DOE.

Dalco Petroleum Inc./Farmland

Industries Inc., 16 DOE ¶ 85,057 (1987).

Prior to granting supplemental refunds,

DOE modified the terms by which the

refund proceeding is conducted by

increasing the small claims injury

presumption refund ceiling from $5,000

to $10,000. In addition, the DOE applied

a medium-range injury presumption

under which applicants could receive a

refund of 40% of their maximum

potential refund without presenting

detailed evidence of injury, subject to

$50,000 ceiling. The supplemental

refunds granted in this proceeding total

$672,930 ($639,224 principal plus

$33,706 interest). The DOE also stated

its intention to make all residual funds

in the Dalco settlement fund available

for indirect restitution pursuant to the

Petroleum Overcharge Distribution and