alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Vincent P. MURRAY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Jeffry PERLOW, Law Office of Moretti and Perlow, Defendant, Appellee.

Nos. 03-2137, 03-2291.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

May 7, 2004.

Vincent P. Murray on brief, pro se.

Jeffry S. Perlow and Moretti & Perlow on brief, for appellee.

Before TORRUELLA Circuit Judge, STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The district court’s judgment and its denial of the Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion are affirmed. Any constitutional claim against appellees is not cognizable. *Cf. Miranda v. Clark County, Nevada,*319 F.3d 465, 468 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 64, 157 L.Ed.2d 28 (2003) (assistant public defender not a state actor when performing traditional role of defense lawyer in criminal proceeding; constitutional claim against public defender not cognizable). The only potential claims here are for legal malpractice and/or breach of contract; but the federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over any such claims in this dispute. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1332.

*Affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1285 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1285

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To extend for 3 years changes to requirements for admission of 
 nonimmigrant nurses in health professional shortage areas made by the 
          Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged 
Areas Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. 3-YEAR EXTENSION FOR CHANGES TO REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMISSION OF 
              NONIMMIGRANT NURSES IN HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE 
              AREAS.

    Section 2 of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999 
(8 U.S.C. 1182 note) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``4-year'' and 
        inserting ``specified''; and
            (2) by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
    ``(e) Limiting Application of Nonimmigrant Changes to Specified 
Period.--The amendments made by this section shall apply to 
classification petitions filed for nonimmigrant status only during the 
period--
            ``(1) beginning on the date that interim or final 
        regulations are first promulgated under subsection (d); and
            ``(2) ending on the date that is 3 years after the date of 
        the enactment of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas 
        Reauthorization Act of 2005.''.

SEC. 3. EXEMPTION FROM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.

    The requirements of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code 
(commonly referred to as the ``Administrative Procedure Act'' ) or any 
other law relating to rulemaking, information collection or publication 
in the Federal Register, shall not apply to any action to implement the 
amendments made by section 2 to the extent the Secretary Homeland of 
Security, the Secretary of Labor, or the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services determines that compliance with any such requirement would 
impede the expeditious implementation of such amendments.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1285

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To extend for 3 years changes to requirements for admission of 
 nonimmigrant nurses in health professional shortage areas made by the 
          Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999.
```
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 837 

Recognizing Israeli-American culture and heritage, the contributions of the 

Israeli-American community to the United States, and condemning 

antisemitic violence and discrimination. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2022 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself and Ms. ROSEN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Israeli-American culture and heritage, the contributions of the Israeli-American community to the 

United States, and condemning antisemitic violence and 

discrimination. 

Whereas the United States is a nation of immigrants, and 

Israeli Americans are cherished along with United States 

citizens of all backgrounds; 

Whereas Israeli Americans are a vibrant immigrant community who contribute heavily to the welfare and diversity 

of the United States; 

Whereas the contributions of Israeli Americans in the fields 

of health sciences, pharmaceutics, disaster relief, astrophysics, mathematics, chemistry, aerospace engineering, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 837 IS 

biotech, agriculture, and internet technologies have been 

invaluable to the United States; 

Whereas Israeli Americans and Jewish Americans contribute 

invaluable skills that promote innovation and productivity 

bearing a quality of life impact for all the United States; 

Whereas Israeli Americans contribute to the advancement of 

civil rights, equal protections, and justice for all United 

States citizens, particularly the most vulnerable; 

Whereas Israeli Americans have helped to form a strong bond 

between the people of the United States and the people 

of Israel, reinforcing the shared values and interests between the 2 countries; 

Whereas Israeli Americans, including young people on college 

campuses and in grade schools in the United States, are 

subjected to incidents of national origin-based discrimination that impact the ability of such individuals to openly 

connect with their culture and celebrate their heritage 

free from bigotry and bias; and 

Whereas anti-Israel incitement has led to assaults and bullying targeting Jewish individuals and Israeli Americans: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) affirms that the Israeli-American commu3 nity has contributed immensely to the society and 

4 culture of the United States; and 

5 (2) condemns all forms of antisemitism, dis6 crimination, and violence that— 

7 (A) aim to marginalize or disenfranchise 

8 members of the Israeli-American community, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 837 IS 

1 the Jewish community broadly, and individuals 

2 of Israeli or Jewish origin; or 

3 (B) infringe upon the ability of Israeli 

4 Americans and other individuals to celebrate 

5 Israeli-American heritage and a deep connection 

6 to Israel. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         341,790
<SECURITIES>                                       000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                       000
<INVENTORY>                                        000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               421,047
<PP&E>                                       8,900,060
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,201,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,119,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          245,507
<BONDS>                                      6,298,605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              000
<PREFERRED>                                        000
<COMMON>                                           000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,424,544)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,119,569
<SALES>                                      1,020,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,034,400
<CGS>                                              000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  541,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               368,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             344,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (220,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (220,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    000
<CHANGES>                                          000
<NET-INCOME>                                 (220,616)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (19.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (19.71)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10379]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting of the Biomedical 
Library Review Committee

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Biomedical Library Review Committee on June 14-15, 1995, 
convening at 8:30 a.m. in the Board Room of the National Library of 
Medicine, Building 38, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    The meeting on June 14 will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. to 
approximately 11 a.m. for the discussion of administrative reports and 
program developments. Attendance by the public will be limited to space 
available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, 
such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Dr. Roger W. Dahlen at 301-496-4221 two 
weeks before the meeting.
    In accordance with provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C., and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
meeting on June 14 will be closed to the public for the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of individual grant applications from 11 
a.m. to approximately 5 p.m., and on June 15 from 8:30 a.m. to 
adjournment. These applications and the discussion could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property, such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications, disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Dr. Roger W. Dahlen, Scientific Review Administrator, and Chief, 
Biomedical Information Support Branch, Extramural Programs, National 
Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, 
telephone number: 301-496-4221, will provide summaries of the meeting, 
rosters of the committee members, and other information pertaining to 
the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879--Medical 
Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10379 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# 15*f3-/¥ ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA# 02-12-00178-CR OFFENSE: OTHER CRIMINAL 

### Russell Jay Regerv. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: Criminal District Court No. 3 DATE: 09/18/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 0579930D



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS Russell Jay Regerv. The State of STYLE: Texas 

# ?Ro se FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: 0i/*£/*f/r JUDGE: fJkUoLu6r— Petition CCA#: 

# J5¥3-/¥ CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Douglas J. BARTEK, et al.

No. 12-1000, R46-013.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 28, 2013.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.
Tomoko FUNAYAMA, petitioner, v. NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION, et al.

No. 12-995.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 124 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 124

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medals awarded under 
            the Hidden Figures Congressional Gold Medal Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2024

    Mr. Lucas (for himself and Ms. Lofgren) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medals awarded under 
            the Hidden Figures Congressional Gold Medal Act.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDALS AWARDED UNDER HIDDEN FIGURES 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL ACT.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on September 18, 2024, for a ceremony to 
present the Congressional Gold Medals awarded under the Hidden Figures 
Congressional Gold Medal Act (Public Law 116-68).
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
Harry NIE, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 12-9798.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Case No. 4:17-cv-00341-HSG 

36272256v1 0989250 

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON

633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043 

213-680-2800 

MARTIN E. ROSEN (SBN 108998)

mrosen@hinshawlaw.com 

RICHARD B. HOPKINS II (SBN 190108) 

rhopkins@hinshawlaw.com 

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 

633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043 

Telephone: 213-680-2800 

Facsimile: 213-614-7399 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

WILCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WILCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AMOR M. IPADO, an individual, LYANNA 

PILLAZAR, an individual, NELSON LASAT, an 

individual, ENRIQUITO PILLAZAR, an 

individual, CONCEPSION PILLAZAR, an 

individual, LALAINE PILLAZAR, an individual, 

AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:17-cv-00341-HSG

(Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Complaint Filed: January 23, 2017 

Discovery Cut-off: Not Set 

Motion Cut-off: Not Set 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to 

participate in the following ADR process: 

_X_ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

___ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

___ Private ADR (specify process and provider) 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

_X_ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to 
HINSHAW & CULB

633 West 5th Street,

Los Angeles, CA 90

213-680-280

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BERTSON

 47th Floor 

0071-2043 

00 

DA

DA

DA

DA

___ 

ATED: 

ATED: 

ATED: 

ATED: Apri

ADR, unless

other reques

IT IS SO OR

il 14, 2017 

 

STIPU

s otherwise o

sted deadline

RDERED. 

2

ULATION AN

ordered.) 

e: 

By:

By:

By:

ND [PROPOSE

HINSHAW

MARTIN E

RICHARD 

Attorneys f

Wilco Life 

MANNION

KELLY M.

Attorneys f

Lyanna Pill

Pillazar, and

SACRAME

JOSEPH A

Attorneys f

Nelson Las

________

 U

ED] ORDER S

C

W & CULBER

E. ROSEN 

B. HOPKIN

for Plaintiff 

Insurance C

N & LOWE 

. MANNION

for Defendan

lazar, Enriqu

d Lalaine Pi

ENTO & FO

. SACRAME

for Defendan

at and Amor

___________

U.S. DISTRIC

SELECTING A

Case No. 4:17-

362

RTSON LLP

NS II 

Company

N

nts 

uito Pillazar,

illazar

ORAN, INC.

ENTO 

nts 

r M. Ipado

__________

CT JUDGE

ADR PROCESS

-cv-00341-HSG

272256v1 098925

P

, Concepsion

__________

S

G

0 

n
John Charles FLETCHER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10027.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W. Mobley,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                 /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                 Paul W. Mobley
                                 Chief Financial Officer of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                 August 13, 2002
Tri Thanh NGUYEN, petitioner, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 12-9554.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
In the Matter of Disbarment of Paul Shearman ALLEN.

No. D-2706.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Disbarment order entered.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Javier Arnoldo GONZALEZ, aka Clumsy; et al., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-50620.

D.C. No. CR-01-00756-GAF.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 23, 2004.

Ronald L. Cheng, Andrew Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty, Office of the U.S. Attorney, *477Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Javier Amoldo Gonzalez, San Bernardino, CA, pro se.

William C. Melcher, Melcher, Melcher *&*Melcher, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Javier Amoldo Gonzalez appeals his conviction and the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to import and distribute cocaine, methamphetamine and marijuana, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gonzalez’ counsel has submitted a brief stating that he has found no meritorious issues for review. No supplemental pro se brief has been filed. The government did not file a brief.

Because Gonzalez knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we dismiss the appeal. *See United States v. Nunez,*223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000) (“Generally, courts will enforce a defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal if (1) the language of the waiver encompasses the defendant’s right to appeal on the grounds claimed on appeal, and (2) the waiver is knowingly and voluntarily made.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2475

___________

Christian Parler, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Adecco USA, Inc., *

* Appeal from the United States

Appellee. * District Court for the

------------------------------------- * District of Minnesota.

*

Christian Parler, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Hood Packaging, Inc., *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 5, 2009

Filed: July 10, 2009

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
-2-

Christian Parler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Title VII

employment-discrimination action as time-barred. The Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission sent Parler a right-to-sue letter dated July 13, 2007. Ninetyseven days later, on October 18, 2007, Parler filed suit. He asserted that he had not

received the right-to-sue letter until July 27, 2007. Defendants moved to dismiss

Parler’s complaint as untimely, see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (plaintiff has ninety

days from receipt of right-to-sue letter to file suit). The district court granted the

motion, applying the presumption that Parler received the right-to-sue letter three days

after the date on the letter and concluding that Parler failed to rebut the presumption.

Given the procedural posture of this case, see Luney v. SGS Auto. Servs., 432

F.3d 866, 867 (8th Cir. 2005) (motion to dismiss reviewed de novo, taking all facts

alleged in complaint as true), we find that Parler’s assertions that he received the letter

on July 27, were sufficient to withstand a dismissal motion based on the application

of a three-day presumption. 

Therefore, we vacate the dismissal and remand the case to the district court. 

______________________________
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APRIL 24, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-14694

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00005-CR-5-MCR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

MARK ANTHONY MULLINS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 24, 2007)

Before BIRCH, BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Mark Anthony Mullins, has filed a
2

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.