alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.46.1

  Schedule Identifying Substantially Identical Agreements to Exhibit No. 10.46.

Various subsidiaries of the Company each entered into a loan agreement which is
substantially identical to the loan agreement filed under Exhibit 10.46. The
following table lists the borrower, lender and loan amount which differs from
that in exhibit 10.46 for each of the 16 loan agreements.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Borrower                              Lender                             Loan Amount
         --------                              ------                             -----------
<S>                                     <C>                                     <C>
MHC Bulow Plantation, L.L.C.            Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital, Inc.    $  10,415,384
MHC Camelot Meadows, L.L.C.             Bank of America, N.A.                    $   7,408,524
MHC Fairview Manor, L.L.C.              Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital, Inc.    $   5,120,000
MHC Flamingo West, L.L.C.               Bank of America, N.A.                    $  10,800,000
MHC Greenwood Village NY, L.L.C.        Bank of America, N.A.                    $  17,718,064
MHC Hillcrest, L.L.C.                   Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital, Inc.    $   4,296,599
MHC Holiday Ranch, L.L.C.               Bank of America, N.A.                    $   3,839,005
MHC Lighthouse Pointe, L.L.C.           Bank of America, N.A.                    $  12,714,829
MHC Pine Lakes Country Club, L.L.C.     Wells Fargo Bank, National Association   $  31,499,536
MHC Sherwood Forest, L.L.C.             Bank of America, N.A.                    $  27,491,293
MHC Southern Palms, L.L.C.              Bank of America, N.A.                    $   5,732,974
MHC The Heritage, L.L.C.                Bank of America, N.A.                    $   9,801,912
MHC Golden Lakes, L.L.C.                Bank of America, N.A.                    $   9,722,325
MHC The Mark, L.L.C.                    Bank of America, N.A.                    $   8,952,581
MHC The Oaks at Countrywood, L.L.C.     Bank of America, N.A.                    $   1,318,949
MHC Westwood Village, L.L.C.            Wells Fargo Bank, National Association   $   7,600,000
</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

American LegalNet, Inc.

www.FormsWorkFlow.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of California

MAGIC LEAP, INC.

) )

) )

) )

) )

) )

) ) Civil Action No.

Plaintiff(s)

v.

TUSA TUC a/k/a TARAS YANCHUK

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

TUSA TUC a/k/a TARAS YANCHUK

Av. Maipu 547 Ushuaia

Tierra del Fuego, Argentina

Phone: 02901-42-1117

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are

the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12

(a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, whose

name and address are:

Magic Leap, Inc.

1855 Griffin Road

Suite B454

Dania Beach, FL 33004

Carrie P. Price

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

560 Mission Street, 31st Floor

San Franscisco, CA 94105

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 5:17-cv-00264-NC Document 2 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

American LegalNet, Inc.

www.FormsWorkFlow.com

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) TUSA TUC a/k/a TARAS YANCHUK

was received by me on (date)

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 5:17-cv-00264-NC Document 2 Filed 01/19/17 Page 2 of 2
Merdelin V. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. TARGET CORPORATION.

No. 12-8530.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC., and

ALBERT CHIN,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-07213 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO 

HAC VICE APPLICATION

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Michael Connor (Dkt. No. 20) is DENIED

because the application form states Attorney Connor is “an active member in good standing of

the bar of North Carolina Supreme” but the attached certificate of good standing is from the

United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. While the application

fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is

submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-07213-WHA Document 22 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 1
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., petitioner, v. Elizabeth S. JACOBS, et al.

No. 12-815.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC., and

ALBERT CHIN,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-07213 WHA

SECOND NOTICE RE

OPPORTUNITIES FOR

YOUNG ATTORNEYS

Counsel for both sides should take note that, in the Court’s view, the upcoming hearings

on May 18 present an excellent opportunity for a young attorney with four or fewer years of

experience to argue all pending motions. 

Dated: May 16, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Item 6. (a)

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 Statement Re Computation of Earnings Per Share
              (dollars in thousands, except for Earnings Per Share)

                                                             Quarter Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                        ------------------------
                                                          1997            1996
                                                        --------        --------
Net income                                              $  4,808        $  4,160
Less:  Preferred stock dividend                               43              43
                                                        --------        --------
Net income applicable to common stock                   $  4,765        $  4,117
                                                        ========        ========

Weighted average common shares                           929,222         940,893
outstanding

Earnings per common share                               $   5.13        $   4.38
Calvin THOMAS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 12-8881.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 100 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2882, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following correction: 

5 Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘Making further con6 solidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending Sep7 tember 30, 2024, and for other purposes.’’. 
2 

•HCON 100 EH 

Passed the House of Representatives March 22, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 100 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

2882. to make a correction in the enrollment of H.R.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11101]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Information, Robotics and Intelligent 
Systems; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Information, Robotics and 
Intelligent Systems (1200).
    Date and Time: May 26, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1150.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Howard Moraff, Acting Deputy Division 
Director, Robotics and Intelligence, Room 1115, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 
306-1928.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Interactive Systems Program 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11101 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Ruben VALDEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-8936.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOHAMMED AZAD, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TOKIO MARINE HCC - MEDICAL 

INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00618-PJH 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO 

FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 87

On July 14, 2017, the court granted the various motions to dismiss in this matter, 

with leave to amend. Dkt. 86. The court ordered that “[p]laintiffs shall file an amended 

complaint by August 7, 2017. No additional claims or parties may be added without leave 

of court or stipulation of defendants.” Id. at 18.

Before the court is a stipulation to extend the deadline for plaintiffs to file an 

amended complaint to August 21, 2017, with the response from defendants due 

September 18, 2017. Dkt. 87. The court GRANTS the request to extend these

deadlines.

However, the stipulation notes that “due to the tentative settlement of the claims of 

[the two named plaintiffs],” plaintiffs’ counsel intend to substitute “new Plaintiffs and 

proposed Class Representatives.” The court’s prior order does not permit the addition of 

new parties without consent of defendants or leave of court. Thus, if plaintiffs intend to 

add or substitute new class representatives, they must either obtain the consent of the 

defendants, or file a motion for leave of court by the deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 7, 2017

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1278 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1278

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to limit the exemption for 
                        asset protection trusts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2005

  Mr. Emanuel (for himself, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Watt, and Mr. Conyers) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to limit the exemption for 
                        asset protection trusts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Billionaire's Loophole Elimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ASSET PROTECTION TRUSTS.

    Section 548 of title 11, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(e)(1) The trustee may avoid a transfer of an interest of the 
debtor in property made by an individual debtor within 10 years before 
the date of the filing of the petition to an asset protection trust if 
the amount of the transfer or the aggregate amount of all transfers to 
the asset protection trust within such 10-year period exceeds $125,000, 
to the extent that the debtor's beneficial interest in the trust does 
not become property of the estate by reason of section 541(c)(2).
    ``(2) An asset protection trust is a trust settled by the debtor, 
in which the debtor has a direct or indirect beneficial interest or 
under which the trustee may distribute property to or for the benefit 
of the debtor, and as to which a restriction on the voluntary or 
involuntary transfer of the debtor's beneficial interest in the trust 
is enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law. For purposes of this 
subsection, the following are not asset protection trusts:
            ``(A) Retirement funds to the extent that those funds are 
        in a fund or account that is exempt from taxation under section 
        401, 403, 408, 408A, 414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986.
            ``(B) Charitable trusts.
            ``(C) Qualified trusts under section 529 of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986, and other educational trusts, funds, or 
        accounts.''.
                                 <all>
```
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD., et al., petitioners, v. APOTEX, INC., et al.

No. 12-984.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
ما داء السكري من النمط 2؟

ينشأ داء السكري من النمط 2 عندما لا ينتج جسمك الأنسولين أو يستخدمه بشكل جيد،

مما يؤدي إلى ارتفاع مستويات السكر في الدم.

لمزيد من المعلومات حول المساواة الصحية، تفضل بزيارة الموقع healthequity/gov.fda.www

وجبة غذائية

متوازنة

ضغط الدم ضبط الوزن

الطبيعي

أسلوب حياة

نشط

قلل من خطر إصابتك بداء السكري من النمط 2

شعور متزايد

بالتعب

زيادة العطش تشوش الرؤية

والتبول 

تزايد الشعور 

بالجوع

بشكل غير مبرر قروح لا تلتئم فقدان الوزن

ًا ما تتطور الأعراض ببطء ويمكن أن تكون خفيفة،

غالب

ولا تظهر أي أعراض على الكثير من الأشخاص.

ًا ما ينشأ داء السكّري من النمط 2 لدى الأشخاص في منتصف 

غالب

? العمر وكبار السن، ويمكن أن يتطور المرض في أي عمر.

هل تعلم

ًا شخص

يعاني تقريب

واحد بين كل 10 أشخاص

 بالغين من الإصابة 

بداء السكري من النمط 2

عدم التدخين
داء السكري وكبار السن

ينشأ داء السكري من النمط 2 عندما لا ينتج جسمك الأنسولين أو يستخدمه بشكل جيد،

مما يؤدي إلى ارتفاع مستويات السكر في الدم.

لمزيد من المعلومات حول المساواة الصحية، تفضل بزيارة الموقع healthequity/gov.fda.www.

الأكل الصحي

عدم التدخين التحكم في

سكر الدم

التحكم في 

ضغط الدم 

ممارسة النشاط

البدني

تناول الأدوية 

وفق إرشادات الطبيب

ًا بداء السكري عن طريق إتباع ما يلي:

حافظ على صحة كليتيك إذا كنت مصاب

يصاب شخص

ُ

واحد من بين كل 4 أشخاص 

بداء السكري بعد تخطي

 عمر 65 ًعاما.

كبار السن لديهم

أعلى معدل إصابة

باعتلال الكلى في المرحلة 

النهائية من داء السكري. يحدث 

هذا عندما تبدأ الكلى بالفشل 

ويحتاج الأمر إلى غسيل الكلى 

(إزالة الفضلات والسوائل الزائدة 

من الجسم) أو زرع الكلى.

94mg

dL
David Blaine HURLEY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7316.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
皮内 JYNNEOS 猴痘疫苗速览

• 向所有面临猴痘感染风险的人提供疫苗是 USG 的首要任务

• JYNNEOS 疫苗可以通过皮下或皮内途径安全给药

• 使用两种不同的给药途径的免疫反应是相似的

• 皮内给药现在可以为社区提供最广泛的保护

迅速发展的猴痘爆发使我们有必要探索所有可用的疫苗选择,为处于危险中的人群提供免疫保护。目前可用的

JYNNEOS 猴痘疫苗的剂量数量不足以为那些可以通过皮下 (SC) 注射经批准的两剂(相隔 4 周)方案受益的人完全接

种疫苗。由于其中的副作用,目前确定不建议使用其他猴痘疫苗。同时也考虑将第二剂 JYNNEOS 疫苗推迟 3 至 6 个

月。然而,在仔细审查了现有证据并承认该策略缺乏精确适用的数据后,该选项被确定为不可取的,因为两剂疫苗在

两次给药之间的保护性都可能不足,并且可能给个人带来一种错误的安全感,即他们没有被保护免受猴痘感染却认为

自己是安全的。

为了解决供供不应求的问题,通过皮内 (ID) 途径接种疫苗被认为是扩大库存的一种策略。一些疫苗可以以较的剂量在

皮肤层之间给药,并且所产生的免疫反应与通过皮下组织给药时所产生的反应非常相似。1JYNNEOS 疫苗中使用的病

毒,即经改良的安卡拉牛痘病毒 (MVA),最初是在 1970 年代通过 ID 途径给予数千名儿童和成人,并且从那时起就在

临床试验中与其他疫苗联合使用 ID 途径。2此外,在美国国家过敏和传染病研究所 (NIAID) 赞助的一项研究中,

JYNNEOS 疫苗以 ID 途径给药的两剂系列进行评估并与 SC 注射相比较。通过 ID 途径接种疫苗的个体接受了向皮肤

层间注射调整的剂量;其中所评估的 ID 剂量体积(0.1 毫升)是 SC 剂量(0.5 毫升)的五分之一。

NIAID 研究的结果表明,基于几个抗体反应测试,ID 给药与 SC 给药产生了非常相似的免疫反应,并证明 SC 和 ID 途

径产生了相似但不相同的细胞免疫反应。3ID 给药确实导致注射部位更红、更硬、更痒和肿胀,但疼痛更少,同时这些

副作用是可控的。有趣的是,在 NIAID 研究中,JYNNEOS 疫苗通过 ID 给药所报告的副作用概况于 1970 年代 MVA 

通过 ID 给药时所描述的副作用概况非常相似。2

基于对所有可用证据的仔细审查并考虑所有可用选项,FDA 确定其符合紧急使用授权 (EUA) 的标准,允许 18 岁及以

上被确认为高感染风险的人群通过 ID 途径接种 JYNNEOS 疫苗,同时也允许 18 岁以下被确认为高感染风险的人群通

过 SC 途径接种 JYNNEOS 疫苗。4

根据稳定性信息,如今经授权的疫苗在 +2°C 至 +8°C(+36°F 至 +46°F)解冻后可保存长达 8 周。小瓶被刺破并取出

一剂后,如果未全部使用,则应将其储存在 +2°C 至 +8°C(+36°F 至 +46°F)的环境下并在刺穿后的 8 小时内丢弃。

应使用低无效体积注射器和针头(27 号),以最大限度地增加从每个小瓶中取得的剂量数量。5

1 Hickling JK et al.公牛世界卫生组织 2011 年;89:221-226。

2 Stickl HA, Preventive Medicine, 1974; 3:97-101; Stickl H et al.Dtsch med Wschr 1974; 99:2386-2392.(注:应要求,

可通过发送电子邮件至 ocod@fda.hhs.gov 向 FDA 领取本文的英文译文。)

3 Frey SE et al.Vaccine 2015; 33:5225-5234; Frey SE et al.J Infect Dis; 2021; 224:1372-1382.

4 包括审查备忘录和情况说明书在内的 EUA 材料可在线获取。

5 有关行政的更多信息和资源,请参阅 2022 年 8 月 10 日的DHCP 信函
Vernon WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-8774.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 805 

Supporting the designation of the week of September 18 through September 

24, 2022, as ‘‘Telehealth Awareness Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. WARNER, and Mrs. HYDE-SMITH) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of the week of September 18 

through September 24, 2022, as ‘‘Telehealth Awareness 

Week’’. 

Whereas telehealth allows a health care practitioner to furnish health care services to a patient or a practitioner at 

a different physical location than the health care practitioner; 

Whereas telehealth has played a significant role in supporting 

access to quality health care services for millions of patients during the COVID–19 public health emergency 

and will continue to be essential beyond the end of the 

public health emergency; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 805 ATS 

Whereas more than 28,000,000 Medicare beneficiaries used 

telehealth during the first year of the COVID–19 pandemic; 

Whereas Medicare beneficiaries used 88 times more telehealth 

services during the first year of the COVID–19 pandemic 

than they did in the prior year while the overall use of 

health care services among such beneficiaries remained 

relatively stable; 

Whereas, following the unprecedented use of telehealth and 

virtual care services in response to the public health 

emergency, telehealth now represents a critical component of care delivery, demonstrating the need to balance 

in-person and virtual care in the health care system; 

Whereas, in 2021, 91 percent of Medicare beneficiaries were 

satisfied with their telehealth experiences; 

Whereas legislative efforts to increase telehealth access have 

received bipartisan support in the Senate and the House 

of Representatives; 

Whereas the United States has the opportunity to help improve broader access to health services for all individuals, 

including members of rural and underserved communities; and 

Whereas ‘‘Telehealth Awareness Week’’ unites the efforts of 

patients, caregivers, health care providers, policymakers, 

and other stakeholders to advance the role of telehealth 

in health care: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of the week of Sep3 tember 18 through September 24, 2022, as ‘‘Tele4 health Awareness Week’’; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 805 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes the impact of telehealth in deliv2 ering health care services for patients across the 

3 United States; and 

4 (3) urges that steps should be taken— 

5 (A) to raise awareness about the benefits 

6 of expanding telehealth; 

7 (B) to highlight resources for health care 

8 providers and patients regarding telehealth; 

9 (C) to collect and analyze data on the im10 pacts of telehealth; and 

11 (D) to promote continued access to tele12 health for all communities and across settings 

13 beyond the COVID–19 pandemic. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO 

HAC VICE APPLICATION

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Michelle Fox (Dkt. No. 1482) is DENIED

because it identifies the applicant as “an active member in good standing of the bar of District

of Massachusetts” but the appended certificate of good standing is from the Supreme Judicial

Court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be

processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 6, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1484 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHUNG KAO,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. SORIA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00873-HSG (PR)

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE REPLY

Re: Dkt. No. 20

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, defendants’ motion for an extension of time to file a reply 

in support of their motion to stay the proceedings is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their reply 

by January 5, 2018.

This order terminates Docket No. 20.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

12/27/2017