alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Defendant

‐ appellee was not served with process in the district court. Accordingly,

it is not a party to this appeal. After examining the appellant’s brief and the record, we

have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus the appeal is submitted on the

appellant’s brief and the record. F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 34(a)(2). 

# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted November 13, 2008 *

Decided November 13, 2008

Before

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 08

‐ 1974

ZACHARY A. McGRAW, JR.,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant

,

v.

CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF

AVIATION,

Defendant

‐ Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 07 C 6481

Robert W. Gettleman,

Judge

.

O R D E R

In November 2007 Zachary McGraw sued the City of Chicago Department of

Aviation, claiming that it discriminated against him on political grounds by not promoting

him, and retaliated against him for previously filing a race

‐ based employment

discrimination suit. Judge Zagel dismissed the suit as frivolous because McGraw failed to

file it within 90 days of receiving his right

‐ to

‐ sue letter from the Equal Employment NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 08

‐ 1974 Page 2

Opportunity Commission. McGraw then filed a self

‐ styled “Motion Not to Dismiss,”

vaguely invoking political discrimination under the terms of the consent decree in Shakman

v. Democratic Org. of Cook County

. Judge Gettleman, to whom the case had been reassigned,

denied the motion as untimely and duplicative of claims that McGraw had raised in a

related suit. McGraw’s subsequent motion to reopen the case under F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 60(b)

was also denied, and he appeals.

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(9)(A) requires the appellant’s brief to set

forth “appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and

parts of the record on which the appellant relies.” F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 28(a)(9)(A); see

Haxhiu v. Mukasey

, 519 F.3d 685, 691 (7th Cir. 2008). An argument must consist of more than

a generalized assertion of error with citations to supporting authority. See Anderson v.

Hardman

, 241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 2001). McGraw’s appellate brief contains only

generalized assertions of misconduct on the part of the City of Chicago, and he does not

challenge, or even mention, the district court’s dismissal of the case. Although we construe

pro se filings liberally, “we must still be able to discern cogent arguments in any appellate

brief, even from a pro se litigant.” See id. Here we have nothing to review because McGraw

has not pointed to any legal or factual error in the district court’s decision. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal.
Edward Bernard GIBSON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7350.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Roy COLUNGA-AMBRIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-41073.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 18, 2004.

*960James Lee Turner, Assistant US Attorney, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, Miguel A. Nogueras, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Lee Roy Colunga-Ambriz (“Colunga”) appeals his conviction and sentence for carjacking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119. He argues that the district court erred in upwardly departing to the statutory maximum of 15 years’ imprisonment because the departure effectively negated his three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. He also argues that 18 U.S.C. § 2119 is unconstitutional.

There was no error in the district court’s determination that Colunga’s criminal history category significantly underrepresented the seriousness of his criminal history. Additionally, the district court properly found that Colunga’s recent similar crimes indicated a high likelihood of recidivism and demonstrated that prior punishment had not been an effective deterrent. Thus, whether the standard of review is abuse of discretion or de novo, the district court did not err in departing upward. *See*U.S.S.G. §§ 4A1.3, p.s. and 5K2.0, p.s.

The district court’s reasons for departure were acceptable. *See United States v. Ashburn,*38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc). Furthermore, Colunga has demonstrated no error regarding the extent of the departure. *Id.; see also United States v. Daughenbaugh,*49 F.3d 171, 174-75 (5th Cir.1995).

Colunga acknowledges that his argument regarding the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 2119 is foreclosed by circuit precedent. *See United States v. Jimenez,*323 F.3d 320, 322 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 124, 157 L.Ed.2d 86 (2003). Nevertheless, he raises the issue to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. Colunga’s argument is indeed foreclosed by *Jimenez. See United States v. Ruff,*984 F.2d 635, 640 (5th Cir.1993). Accordingly, his conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1328 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1328

               For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2005

  Ms. Carson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN LOSSES.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, not later 
than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, out of 
funds not otherwise appropriated, to Adela and Darryl Bailor the amount 
determined by the Attorney General under section 2(b).
    (b) Settlement.--The payment of this sum shall be in full 
settlement of all claims of Adela and Darryl Bailor arising from an 
incident on May 9, 1991, that is the subject of Case No. 94-2660 in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.
    (d) Limitation.--No person shall have any claim on the amount 
described in this section, whether contractual, equitable or statutory, 
except for reasonable attorneys fees and expenses that do not exceed 10 
percent of the amount paid under subsection (a).

SEC. 2. AMOUNT.

    (a) Transmittal of Claims.--Not later than 6 months after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, Adela and Darryl Bailor, or their 
representative, shall transmit to the Attorney General all claims for 
compensation referred to in section 1.
    (b) Determination of the Attorney General.--Not later than 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, with appropriate 
consideration given to the claims transmitted under subsection (a), the 
Attorney General shall determine the amount that Adela and Darryl 
Bailor shall receive.
                                 <all>
```
## NO. 12

- 1 3

- 00 186

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ALAN UTZ & ASSOCIATE S, INC.

, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

APPELLANT

V.

ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL

, RED DOT CORPORATION, CE CIL

PADGETT D/B/A PADGET T & SON

MASONRY & PADGETT MA SONRY, § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

LLC, COOPER PLASTERI NG, INC.,

ALTO CONCRETE FLOORS

, BREEDLOVE SITE SERVI CES, LLC

D/B/A BREEDLOVE NURS ERY AND

LANDSCAPE COMPANY, A ND JOHN

ODEN D/B/A METAL & M O RE, INC.,

APPELLEES § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Alan Utz & Associates, Inc. has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal and has

certified that all other parties to the appeal have been given notice of the filing of this motion.

Because Alan Utz & Associates, Inc. has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.1(a)(1) , the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed

.

Opinion delivered April 9 , 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. , and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 9 , 2014

NO. 12

- 13

- 00186

- CV

ALAN UTZ & ASSOCIATE S, INC.,

Appellant

V.

ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL, RED DOT CORPORATION,

CECIL PADGETT D /B/A PADGETT & SON MASONRY &

PADGETT MASONRY

, LLC, COOPER PLASTERING, I NC.,

ALTO CONCRETE FLOORS

, BREEDLOVE SITE SERVI CES, LLC

D/B/A BREEDLOVE NURS ERY AND LANDSCAPE COMPANY,

AND JOHN ODEN D/B/A METAL & M ORE, INC.,

Appellees

Appeal from the 7th Judicial District Court

of Smith County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 12

- 1098

- A )

THIS CAUSE came on to be he ard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the

appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion is granted the appeal be dismissed , and that this

decision be certified to the court be low for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

P anel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 947

_____________________________
H AROLD N. F AUST , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Robert R. Wheeler , Judge

. February 22, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Harold N. Faust, pro se, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for A ppellee.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      Exhibit 12

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                  JUNE 30, 2004
                                                  -------------
<S>                                              <C>
Income before income taxes ...........               $ 66,732
                                                     --------
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest on debt .....................                 72,556
Estimated interest portion of rents ..                  1,394
                                                     --------
Total fixed charges ..................                 73,950
                                                     --------
Adjusted income ......................                140,682
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)                  1.90x
                                                     ========
</TABLE>

      (1)   The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing
            income before income taxes and fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed
            charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental expense as
            representative of interest portion of rentals.


                                       25
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1285 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1285

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 2006

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To extend for 3 years changes to requirements for admission of 
 nonimmigrant nurses in health professional shortage areas made by the 
          Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged 
Areas Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. 3-YEAR EXTENSION FOR CHANGES TO REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMISSION OF 
              NONIMMIGRANT NURSES IN HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE 
              AREAS.

    Section 2 of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999 
(8 U.S.C. 1182 note) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``4-year'' and 
        inserting ``specified''; and
            (2) by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
    ``(e) Limiting Application of Nonimmigrant Changes to Specified 
Period.--The amendments made by this section shall apply to 
classification petitions filed for nonimmigrant status only during the 
period--
            ``(1) beginning on the date that interim or final 
        regulations are first promulgated under subsection (d); and
            ``(2) ending on the date that is 3 years after the date of 
        the enactment of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas 
        Reauthorization Act of 2005.''.

SEC. 3. EXEMPTION FROM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.

    The requirements of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code 
(commonly referred to as the ``Administrative Procedure Act'' ) or any 
other law relating to rulemaking, information collection or publication 
in the Federal Register, shall not apply to any action to implement the 
amendments made by section 2 to the extent the Secretary Homeland of 
Security, the Secretary of Labor, or the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services determines that compliance with any such requirement would 
impede the expeditious implementation of such amendments.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN DULBERG, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and

RASIER, LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00850 WHA

ORDER APPROVING

PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE

AND DISTRIBUTION PLAN

The parties’ joint proposal for distribution of class notice (Dkt. No. 83) is APPROVED. 

The parties shall please complete distribution of notice to the class by MARCH 22 and file a

statement promptly thereafter to inform the Court that distribution has been completed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2018. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00850-WHA Document 84 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 1
덜 익은 간 쇠고기를 먹은 고객은병에 걸릴 

수 있으며 심지어 사망하기도 합니다.

어디서든 고객의 안전에 유의하십시오.

온도계로 확인하여 간 소고기를최소 17 초 동

안155°F(68°C)에서 조리하도록 하십시오.

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection
Undercooking ground beef can make your

customers very sick and even kill them.

Protect People Everywhere.

Use a thermometer to make sure ground beef

is cooked to at least 155oF (68oC) for 17 

seconds. 

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection
Charles E. YEAGER, aka Chuck, et al., petitioners, v. Connie BOWLIN, et al.

No. 12-1047.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mathematical Statistician 

Description of Duties 

Design and oversee the statistical components of broad and complex research studies aimed at 

estimating and testing hypotheses. Apply mathematical techniques, and perform computerized 

analyses to determine the adequacy of collected public health data needed to resolve scientific 

problems, and modify existing techniques and practices. Provide consultation and training to 

professionals inside and outside the Agency, domestically or internationally. Recommend to 

management modifications in the conduct of research and training researchers to introduce new 

methods and otherwise maintain standards for the application of statistical methods to public 

health research. 

Evaluate and integrate data from complex probability-based surveys, observational studies, 

designed experiments, and analysis of data from large dataset/databases; use mathematical and 

statistical programming and data processing using programs such as R/S-plus, C++, Matlab, 

Stata, Java, Perl and SAS; design biological and chemical experimental studies; provides 

support for microbial and chemical assay and method development. Conduct analysis of 

population level surveys, population projection modeling and micro-simulation models; 

econometrics; econometrics dynamical systems, systems biology simulation.

Qualifications 

 A minimum of a bachelor’s degree or higher that included 24 semester hours of 

mathematics and statistics, of which at least 12 semester hours in mathematics and 6 

semester hours were in statistics. A doctoral degree in mathematics, statistics or related 

discipline is strongly preferred. A combination of education (coursework equivalent to a 

major) and experience may be considered. 

 U.S. citizenship is required. 

Education 

An official transcript, unofficial transcript, or a list including courses, grades earned, completion 

dates, and quarter and semester hours earned may be required. If you are using education 

completed in foreign colleges or universities to meet the qualification requirements, you must 

show that the education credentials have been evaluated by a private organization that specializes 

in interpretation of foreign education programs and such education has been deemed equivalent 

to that gained in an accredited U.S. education program; or full credit has been given for the 
courses at a U.S. accredited college or university. For further information, click on: foreign 

education.

Note: Please review each grade announcement for the specific qualifications and specialized 

experience 

Grade (Salary) Level 

Federal General Schedule (GS) grade levels at which Mathematical Statisticians are commonly 

filled are: 

 GS-12 through GS-15 ($79,720.00 to $161,900.00 / Per Year) 

Geographic Location 

Mathematical Statisticians are located at FDA Headquarters in Silver Spring, MD
Les JANKEY, petitioner, v. SONG KOO LEE.

No. 12-956.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Alco Energy Corp. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and   procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: October 10, 2008 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
Andre PAGAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2332

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Lamont WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9203.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAN FRANCISCO REGIONAL CENTER 

LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00223-RS 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE; DENYING 

INTERVENORS' REQUEST FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE "CROSS-MOTION"

 The Intervenors’ motion (Dkt. No. 501) to extend the briefing schedule on plaintiff’s 

motion for partial summary judgment is granted. Their request for leave to include a “crossmotion” with their opposition is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31, 2018

______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge