alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the amendment to the Annual Report of EMC
Metals Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the year ended
December 31, 2011 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated:     June 5, 2012 | /s/ George Putnam          
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        | George Putnam              
|                        | Principal Executive Officer

---
WHY ARE TOBACCO PRODUCTS SO HARD TO QUIT? 

NICOTINE. Tobacco products are addictive because they contain nicotine. 

Nicotine keeps people using tobacco products, even when they want to stop.

WHAT IS NICOTINE?

Nicotine is a highly addictive chemical compound present in a tobacco plant. All tobacco 

products contain nicotine, such as cigarettes, cigars, smokeless tobacco, hookah tobacco, 

and most e-cigarettes. Nicotine is what keeps people using tobacco products.

WHAT MAKES TOBACCO USE HARMFUL?

It’s the thousands of chemicals contained in tobacco and tobacco smoke that make tobacco

use so deadly. This toxic mix of chemicals—not nicotine—causes serious health effects, 

including fatal lung diseases and cancer. Some of these chemicals, known to cause lung 

damage, are also found in some e-cigarette aerosols.

HOW CAN NICOTINE ALSO HELP PEOPLE QUIT SMOKING?

FDA-approved nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs), such as nicotine skin patches,

gum, and lozenges, are designed to help addicted adults quit smoking by delivering

small amounts of nicotine to the brain. When used properly, NRTs can double the

chances of successfully quitting cigarettes for good.

If you use tobacco products and would like to quit, consult with your health care provider about treatment options. 

You can also find resources to help you on your journey to living a smoke-free life at Smokefree.gov.

CTP-212
Donald K. ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. BOONE HOSPITAL CENTER, et al.; and Donald K. Alexander, petitioner, v. CH Allied Services, Inc., et al.

No. 12-8620.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until May 6, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
#### Steven OWENS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 03-2454.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 2004.

Decided May 25, 2004.

Steven Owens, Appellant pro se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Steven Owens seeks review of the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the denial of Social Security disability income benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(f) (2003). Our review of the record discloses that the Commissioner’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons *939stated by the district court and the magistrate judge. *See Owens v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.,*No. CA-02-65 (W.D.Va. Sept. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11592]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse 
and Alcoholism.
    The meeting will be open to the public, as indicated, to discuss 
administrative details or other issues relating to committee activities 
as indicated in the notice. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Ida Nestorio at (301) 443-4375.
    The meeting will be closed to the public, as indicated below, in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(6), Title 5, 
U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, for the review, discussion, 
and evaluation of intramural programs and projects conducted by the 
National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
productivity of individual staff scientists, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    A summary of the meeting and the roster of committee members may be 
obtained from Ms. Ida Nestorio, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, 6000 Executive Blvd., Suite 409, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003. 
Telephone: 301-443-4375.
    Other information pertaining to the meeting can be obtained from 
the Executive Secretary.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAAA.
    Executive Secretary: Theodore Colburn, Ph.D., 9000 Rockville 
Pike, Building 31--MSC 2088, Room 1B58, Bethesda, MD 20892-2088, 
301-402-1226.
    Date of Meeting: June 5-6, 1995.
    Place of Meeting: Conference Room 9, Bldg. 31, NIH Campus, 9000 
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Open: June 5, 7:30 a.m. to 8 a.m.
    Agenda: Discussion of administrative details and other issues 
related to Board activities.
    Closed: June 5, 8 a.m. to recess; June 6, 9 a.m. to adjournment.
    Agenda: Review and evaluation of intramural research programs 
and projects.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-11592 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Charles WIIG, petitioner, v. C. ULRICH, et al.

No. 12-9025.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey Markin, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Jeffrey MarkinJeffrey
      MarkinPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
      12, 2010





This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

 

SHRUTI SHETTY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ALPHABET, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No: C 17-00589 SBA

 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO REQUEST CHANGE 

OF JUDGE 

Dkt. 13 

Plaintiff Shruti Shetty (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), 

has filed a Motion to Request Change of Judge to Expedite Case Given Perversion of 

Justice. Dkt. 13. Although the motion is generally incoherent, it appears to make two 

requests: (1) reassignment of another case—No. 16-CV-06012—that Plaintiff has pending 

before Judge Haywood Gilliam, Jr.; and (2) transfer of both this case and the case before 

Judge Gilliam to a court in San Francisco. 

The Court notes that Plaintiff has already made, and the Court has already denied, a 

request to transfer the instant action to San Francisco. See Mot. to Transfer Case to SF, 

Dkt. 11; Order Denying Pl.’s Request, Dkt. 12. 

Regarding Plaintiff’s request to reassign the case pending before Judge Gilliam 

and/or to transfer that case to San Francisco, this Court has no authority to reassign or 

transfer a case pending before another district judge. See generally In re McBryde, 117 

F.3d 208, 225 n.11 (5th Cir. 1997) (“[T]he structure of the federal courts does not allow one 

judge of a district court to rule directly on the legality of another district judge’s judicial 

acts or to deny another district judge his or her lawful jurisdiction.”) (quoting Dhalliun v. 

Case 4:17-cv-00589-SBA Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

McKibben, 682 F. Supp. 1096 (D. Nev. 1988)). 

Additionally, the Court notes that cases in this district are assigned blindly and at 

random by the Clerk of the Court. General Order No. 44; 28 U.S.C. § 137 (“The business 

of a court having more than one judge shall be divided among the judges as provided by the 

rules and orders of the court.”). Absent recusal or some other inability to serve on the part 

of the assigned judge, reassignment is not authorized. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 3/28/17 ______________________________ 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

Senior United States District Judge 

Case 4:17-cv-00589-SBA Document 15 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 2
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


MortgageIT Securities Corporation
33 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Securities
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.

February 25, 2008
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
KRISTEN ANN CRONIN
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for MortgageIT Securities Corp. Mortgage Loan
  Trust, Series 2007-1 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Wells Fargo Bank,
  N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for MortgageIT Securities Corp. Mortgage Loan
  Trust, Series 2007-2 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Wells Fargo Bank,
  N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable
Angela S. WOODS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7670.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43341

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent
,

v.

GARRETT RAY ASHFORD

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 501

Filed: April 27, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho,

Elmore County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Att orney General; Jessica M. Lorello , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Garrett Ray Ashford pleaded guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, Idaho

Code § 18

- 1508 . The district court imposed a unified life sentence, with twenty years

determinate. Ashford appeal s, contending that his sentence is excessive. 1

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be re peated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1 In the Appellant’s Brief, Ashford raised the issue of whether the district court erred by failing to include a specific expiration date for the no con tact order, but Ashford withdrew the

issue in his Reply Brief.2

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ashford ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN L. FRANKAllan L. Frank, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Antwan Lamar JACKSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10047.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 126 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.126
                                     Agreed to September 9, 2024        

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY TO AWARD POSTHUMOUSLY 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL IN COMMEMORATION TO 
              SERVICEMEMBERS WHO PERISHED IN AFGHANISTAN ON AUGUST 26, 
              2021, DURING EVACUATION OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND 
              AFGHAN ALLIES AT HAMID KARZAI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT.

    (a) Authorization.--The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be 
used on September 10, 2024, for a ceremony to award posthumously a 
Congressional Gold Medal in commemoration to the servicemembers who 
perished in Afghanistan on August 26, 2021, during the evacuation of 
citizens of the United States and Afghan allies at Hamid Karzai 
International Airport.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Lavelle MARKS, petitioner, v. Millicent WARREN, Warden.

No. 12-9035.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Asher
Zwebner, the Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Director of Majic Wheels Corp, certifies, under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      March 3, 2010
                MAJIC
      WHEELS CORP.By:
                /s/ Asher ZwebnerName: Asher Zwebner
                  Title:    Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                  Financial 
      Officer and Director (Principal
                  Executive, Financial and 
      Accounting Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.