Stip. and Order Extending Time to Respond to TAC Case No. 3:17-cv-00561-WHO 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARC N. BERNSTEIN (SBN 145837) DENISE M. MINGRONE (SBN 135224)

mbernstein@blgrp.com dmingrone@orrick.com

WILL B. FITTON (SBN 182818) ROBERT L. URIARTE (SBN 258274)

wfitton@blgrp.com ruriarte@orrick.com

THE BUSINESS LITIGATION ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFF LLP 

GROUP, P.C. 1000 Marsh Road

555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1650 Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015

San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 650-614-7400

Telephone: 415.765.6633 Facsimile: 650-614-7401

Facsimile: 415.283.4804

CLAUDIA FROST (Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Defendant cfrost@orrick.com

CHING-HAN TSAI ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFF LLP

609 Main Street, 49th Floor

Houston, TX 77002-3106

Telephone: 713-658-6460

Facsimile: 731-658-6401

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYNOPSYS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., UBIQUITI 

NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL 

LIMITED, CHING-HAN TSAI, and DOES 

1-20, inclusive,

Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case No. 3:17-cv-00561-WHO 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 220 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 4
1

Stip. and Order Extending Time to Respond to TAC Case No. 3:17-cv-00561-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant Ching-Han Tsai (Mr. Tsai) and Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (Synopsys) 

stipulate as follows:

The Third Amended Complaint (TAC) in this action was served on Mr. Tsai

on June 7, 2018, and a pleading responsive to the TAC is currently due from Mr. Tsai

on June 21, 2018. As permitted by Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1(b), 

Synopsys and Mr. Tsai agree that the time for Mr. Tsai to answer the TAC is 

extended to and includes July 6, 2018. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), this stipulated request is accompanied by a 

declaration that sets forth the reasons for the requested enlargement of time, 

discloses all previous time modifications, and describes the effect the requested time 

modification will have on the schedule for the case. No current Court-ordered event 

dates or deadlines are affected by this stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: June 15, 2018 THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP, P.C.

By: /s/Marc N. Bernstein

 Marc N. Bernstein

Attorneys for Defendant

CHING-HAN TSAI

DATED: June 15, 2018 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

By: /s/Denise M. Mingrone _

 Denise M. Mingrone

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SYNOPSYS, INC.

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 220 Filed 06/15/18 Page 2 of 4
2

Stip. and Order Extending Time to Respond to TAC Case No. 3:17-cv-00561-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 15, 2018 __________________________________

HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United Stated District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 220 Filed 06/15/18 Page 3 of 4
3

Stip. and Order Extending Time to Respond to TAC Case No. 3:17-cv-00561-WHO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest the concurrence in the

filing of this document has been obtained from Denise M. Mingrone.

DATED: June 15, 2018 THE BUSINESS LITIGATION GROUP, P.C.

By: _ /s/ Marc N. Bernstein___

 Marc N. Bernstein

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 220 Filed 06/15/18 Page 4 of 4