alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORRIS GREEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00607-TSH 

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S LETTER

Re: Dkt. No. 143

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s letter regarding issues he experienced in uploading his 

opposition documents in ECF. ECF No. 143. As requested, the Court provides the contact 

information for the ECF Help Desk below. Given this delay, the Court extends briefing deadlines 

as follows: Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ summary judgment motion is due February 11, 

2021, Defendants’ reply is due February 25, 2021, and the hearing is continued to March 18, 2021 

at 10:00 a.m. by Zoom video conference. The webinar link and instructions are located at 

https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/hixson-thomas-s-tsh/. 

The ECF Help Desk

Information available at: https://cand.uscourts.gov/cases-e-filing/cm-ecf/support-andtroubleshooting/the-ecf-helpdesk/

Hours: Monday – Friday 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. 

Email: ECFhelpdesk@cand.uscourts.gov (The best way to obtain support is via email. If 

there is a case number, please include it with the Judge’s initials in the subject line.) 

Telephone: (866) 638-7829

You may call during support hours or, to schedule phone support to fit your schedule, send 

Case 3:17-cv-00607-TSH Document 144 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

an email requesting a call back at a specific time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2021

THOMAS S. HIXSON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00607-TSH Document 144 Filed 02/05/21 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60163

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL BULLOCK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:01-CR-7-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender representing Michael Bullock has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent

review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Bullock’s response

shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We

decline to address any claim of ineffective assistance of

counsel, without prejudice to Bullock’s right to assert such

claims in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States
No. 05-60163

-2-

v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
German Dario POLANCO, aka El Negro, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10079.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN DULBERG, individually, and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and

RASIER, LLC, 

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00850 WHA

NOTICE RE QUESTIONS FOR

THURSDAY’S HEARING

Counsel on both sides shall please be prepared to answer the following questions at

tomorrow’s final approval hearing: 

1. Based on the currently requested attorney’s fees, expenses, and

lead plaintiff award, what is the average amount each class member will recover?

How many class members will receive less than $5? Less than $20? More than

$100? 

2. How many class members will receive nothing? 

3. 57 members of the class had been e-mailed and those e-mails

bounced back. What specifically was done to attempt to re-contact them? 

Case 3:17-cv-00850-WHA Document 146 Filed 04/24/19 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. If this case went to trial, what would be the maximum possible

recovery? 

5. Were the expert reports, for which all of the calculations have been

based, prepared for trial or for settlement? 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 24, 2019. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00850-WHA Document 146 Filed 04/24/19 Page 2 of 2
Michael D. RAMSEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10080.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
fitVl. rfThe*/ /fl't J^i-h'Ct e>4 ^JlAh^Jrli^

S\/*h$i p/t, ^2 t?/^ //^ ^ ^^ ***#&

/**¥***&%

f*£<*•<&.

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

DEC 29 2014

TYLER TEXAS

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK
^JtKfX CtfiAij- o-f Affe*,/

Cms, a* 12 -/v. Otist*c« T«*t C,*+ Cjh. _^-y • ^ 007-//r*-/£-'*''

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court ofAppeals CHstrict

/j/flfoe Q^ -X^jjdch^. C28 2d»

mm it***- -cT^ /5ry >^^

fat Km* $U/ * v,ft 0{ H0? Ll^s

'' ht>le*, Cat/rnr^ Ai«/ d<}/ /lei /)*// ^)

Ai+nv ,+ fa m<f/^ 0j /irf>/;c4«+'j c/<*;»>.

sjx« 12** Ct*\k of- Af#**( n*vi \iAnr/fcb^>, j^

%&> (ft* Cf Arrr/i«\\ 5,c frf*^ m/A«Mrt»i *IL^&L3l3*i fe fa ft, £*}

TYLER TSXAJ

feE

^S~oA fir/ /?fC6r*«^
J[A,> /Utf(c fif ^(/J^ u;^ JQ/7J- ^

all ncL/^' Uts+ ^ WhH m^

C3^ WO<^
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 399 

Honoring North Carolinians and other members of the Armed Forces who 

made the ultimate sacrifice in the attack on Hamid Karzai International 

Airport on August 26, 2021. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring North Carolinians and other members of the 

Armed Forces who made the ultimate sacrifice in the 

attack on Hamid Karzai International Airport on August 

26, 2021. 

Whereas Marine Corps Sergeant Nicole L. Gee, born in Roseville, a suburb of Sacramento, California, and assigned to 

Combat Logistics Battalion 24, 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit, II Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp 

Lejeune, North Carolina, made the ultimate sacrifice during the attack on Hamid Karzai International Airport on 

August 26, 2021; 

Whereas Army Staff Sergeant Ryan C. Knauss, assigned to 

9th PSYOP Battalion, 8th PSYOP Group, Ft. Bragg, 

North Carolina, made the ultimate sacrifice during the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 399 IS 

attack on Hamid Karzai International Airport on August 

26, 2021; 

Whereas members of the Marine Corps, including Staff Sergeant Darin T. Hoover of Salt Lake City, Utah, Sergeant 

Johanny Rosario Pichardo of Lawrence, Massachusetts, 

Corporal Hunter Lopez of Indio, California, Corporal 

Daegan W. Page of Omaha, Nebraska, Corporal 

Humberto A. Sanchez of Logansport, Indiana, Lance 

Corporal David L. Espinoza of Rio Bravo, Texas, Lance 

Corporal Rylee J. McCollum of Jackson, Wyoming, 

Lance Corporal Dylan R. Merola of Rancho Cucamonga, 

California, Lance Corporal Kareem M. Nikoui of Norco, 

California, and Lance Corporal Jared M. Schmitz of St. 

Charles, Missouri, all made the ultimate sacrifice during 

the attack on Hamid Karzai International Airport on August 26, 2021; 

Whereas Navy Hospital Corpsman Third Class Maxton W. 

Soviak of Berlin Heights, Ohio, made the ultimate sacrifice during the attack on Hamid Karzai International 

Airport on August 26, 2021; and 

Whereas all those who served, fought, or perished in the overall Global War On Terror have served valiantly in defense 

of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) Marine Corps Sergeant Nicole L. Gee, 

3 Army Staff Sergeant Ryan C. Knauss, and their fel4 low members of the Armed Forces— 

5 (A) served the United States with honor 

6 and distinction; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 399 IS 

1 (B) represent the very best of the United 

2 States; and 

3 (2) the United States— 

4 (A) honors those brave members of the 

5 Armed Forces and their families; and 

6 (B) shall never forget the services they 

7 rendered and sacrifices they made in the de8 fense of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
James A. PANTELES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-6906.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

RE TRIAL PREPARATION

By JUNE 16 AT NOON, each side shall please file a précis not to exceed FIVE PAGES in

length (with no attachments) describing two motions in limine — other than challenges to

expert witnesses — that it recommends be heard in advance of the final pretrial conference. By

JUNE 19 AT NOON, each side shall also file a response not to exceed FIVE PAGES in length (with

no attachments) to the other side’s précis. The Court will then select two motions in limine to

hear in advance of the final pretrial conference. The purpose of this procedure is to take some

of the pressure off the final pretrial conference date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 12, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 604 Filed 06/12/17 Page 1 of 1
Baker & McKenzie LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center 

11th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

+ 1 415 576 3000 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SFODMS #6773928 - v. 1

Case No. 16-cv-07243-BLF 

DEFENDANT AGODA COMPANY PTE. LTD.’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STMT & CERT. OF INTERESTED ENTITIES 

Colin H. Murray (State Bar No. 159142)

 Colin.Murray@bakermckenzie.com Teresa H. Michaud (State Bar No. 296329) 

 Teresa.Michaud@bakermckenzie.com Anne M. Kelts (State Bar No. 298710) 

 Anne.Kelts@bakermckenzie.com 

BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: + 1 415 576 3000 

Facsimile: + 1 415 576 3099 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AGODA COMPANY PTE. LTD., 

AGODA INTERNATIONAL USA INC., and 

THE PRICELINE GROUP INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

AN PHAN, as an individual and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AGODA COMPANY PTE. LTD., a Singapore 

private limited liability company; and DOES 1 

through 50, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-07243-BLF 

Removed from the California Superior Court, 

County of Santa Clara on 

December 19, 2016 - 

Superior Court Case No. 16CV302647 

Date of Filing of Action in the 

Superior Court: November 14, 2016 

DEFENDANT AGODA COMPANY 

PTE. LTD.’S CORPORATE 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND 

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED 

ENTITIES OR PERSONS 

Before the Honorable Beth Labson Freeman 

Courtroom 3 - 5th Floor 

San Jose Courthouse 

280 South 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95113
Baker & McKenzie LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center 

11th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

+ 1 415 576 3000 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SFODMS #6773928 - v. 1

1

Case No. 16-cv-07243-BLF 

DEFENDANT AGODA COMPANY PTE. LTD.’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STMT & CERT. OF INTERESTED ENTITIES 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Civil Local Rule 3-15, and 

on behalf of Defendant Agoda Company Pte. Ltd. (“Defendant”), the undersigned certifies that the 

following listed persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent 

corporations) or other entities (i) have a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a 

party to the proceeding, or (ii) have a non-financial interest in that subject matter or in a party that 

could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. 

Entities or Persons Interest 

An Phan Plaintiff 

Agoda Company Pte. Ltd. Defendant 

Agoda Holding Company Ltd. 100% Owner of Agoda Company Pte. Ltd. 

Defendant further discloses the following: 

Agoda Company Pte. Ltd. is wholly-owned by Agoda Holding Company Ltd., a private, limited 

Mauritius company. 

 

Dated: January 26, 2017 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP

By: /s/ Teresa H. Michaud

 Teresa H. Michaud 

Attorneys for Defendants 

AGODA COMPANY PTE. LTD. 

AGODA INTERNATIONAL USA INC., 

and THE PRICELINE GROUP INC.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Richard W. McCullough                          |   | March 30, 2011 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|
| Richard W. McCullough                              |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                               |   | March 30, 2011 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |

----
Luis MADRID, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10267.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       24,362  
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        2,327  
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             48,200  
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0  
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 365,433  
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      108,127  
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        111,181  
<LOANS>                                     766,414  
<ALLOWANCE>                                   9,432  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,355,839  
<DEPOSITS>                                1,004,490  
<SHORT-TERM>                                  1,000  
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          12,756  
<LONG-TERM>                                 218,211  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0  
<PREFERRED>                                       0  
<COMMON>                                        162  
<OTHER-SE>                                   99,083  
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            1,355,839  
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              15,632  
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             6,950  
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                679  
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             23,261  
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            8,494  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           11,666  
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        11,595  
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   608  
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              326  
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               6,952  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               5,512  
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    5,512  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0  
<CHANGES>                                         0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  3,475  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.21 
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    0  
<LOANS-NON>                                   1,013  
<LOANS-PAST>                                    225  
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                601  
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 850  
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              8,889  
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    88  
<RECOVERIES>                                     23  
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             9,432  
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          9,432  
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0  
        


</TABLE>
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981)

SJSagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)

EGale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (SBN 268542)

JAngelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste 100

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 297-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff Victor Vazquez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR VAZQUEZ, 

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00424-RS

 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT plaintiff Victor Vazquez and defendant Experian 

Information Solutions, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, have reached a 

settlement in principle of the above captioned case and are in the process of documenting said 

settlement. The Parties believe the settlement will be finalized within sixty (60) days and will 

request dismissal of Experian Information Solutions, Inc. from this action upon finalization. 

Sagaria Law, P.C.

Dated: October 3, 2017 By: /s/ Elliot Gale 

Elliot Gale

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

//

Case 3:17-cv-00424-RS Document 41 Filed 10/03/17 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jones Day

Dated: October 3, 2017 By: /s/ Benjamin Chung Lee

Benjamin Chung Lee

 Attorneys for Defendant

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file 

this Notice. I hereby attest that Benjamin Chung Lee has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

Case 3:17-cv-00424-RS Document 41 Filed 10/03/17 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04

- 19

- 00438

- CR & 04

- 19

- 00450

- CR

EX PARTE Robert METZGER

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A1920

and

From the 216 th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7000

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s orders denying habeas

corpus relief are AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 26, 2020.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1088]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service


Public Meeting in Washington, DC on Customs Automated Export 
System

AGENCY: Customs Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice that Customs is going to hold a 
public meeting in Washington, DC to update the export trade community 
on the current developments of the Automated Export System.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, February 2, 1995, from 9 
a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Washington, DC at the U.S. 
Department of Commerce Auditorium at 14th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lorna Finley, Automated Export System 
Development Team (202) 927-0280. If interested in attending meeting, 
RSVP by FAX to Ms. Finley at (202) 927-0742.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Customs will be holding a public meeting in 
Washington, DC at the Department of Commerce Auditorium at 14th Street 
and Constitution Avenue NW., on Thursday, February 2, 1995, from 9 a.m. 
to 1 p.m. to update the export trade community on the current 
developments of the Automated Export System (AES). At this meeting the 
AES Development Team and the Trade Resource Group will discuss the 
following topics:

1--Status of AES Development;
2--Data Elements--Prefiling Requirements;
3--Data Communications--Technical Issues;
4--Planned Implementation by July 1995; and
5--Bureau of Export Administration and Office of Defense Trade Controls 
Interface.

    All of the public is invited to attend the meeting. If you plan to 
attend, please RSVP by FAX to Lorna Finley at 202-927-0742.

    Dated: January 11, 1995.
Sharon A. Mazur,
Director, Automated Export, System Development Team.
[FR Doc. 95-1088 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P