alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UBER’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

sf-3752373 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC, AND OTTO 

TRUCKING LLC’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION OF, AND 

TO STAY, TRADE SECRET AND 

UCL CLAIMS [9 U.S.C. §§ 3, 4] 

Complaint Filed: February 23, 2017 

First Am. Compl. Filed: March 10, 2017 

Trial Date: October 2, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 115-4 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UBER’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

sf-3752373 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The Court, having considered Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ottomotto LLC, and 

Otto Trucking, LLC (collectively “Uber”)’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Arbitration 

of, And to Stay, Trade Secret AND UCL Claims [9 U.S.C. §§ 3, 4], the Memorandum of Points 

and Authorities, the Declaration of Arturo González, and all exhibits thereto, and after hearing 

arguments of counsel, and finding good cause therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

Defendants’ joint motion to compel arbitration of the trade secret misappropriation and 

UCL claims (collectively, the first, second, and seventh causes of action) is GRANTED. Those 

claims are stayed under 9 U.S.C. § 3 pending the outcome of the arbitration. The remaining 

causes of action will proceed in this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________, 2017 

 __________________________________ 

HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 115-4 Filed 03/27/17 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NORMAN MICHAEL VEGA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 701 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0001478 19-AUG-2013 08:37 AM
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global BPO Services Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, R. Scott Murray, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                                                 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 17, 2008 |  | /s/    R. Scott
Murray                                                                          
|                      |  | R. Scott Murray                                                                                 
|                      |  | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and Interim Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-146804, Form S-3 No. 333-155235 and Form S-3 No. 333-170333) of DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our reports datedFebruary 24, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P., included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia 

February 24,2011
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors6 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
# L_2018101EN.01000301.xml

| 20.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 101/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 101/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/600

of 10 October 2016

on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207, in conjunction with Article 218(5), thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 July 2013, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with New Zealand with a view to concluding an Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (‘the Agreement’). The negotiations were successfully concluded by the initialling of the Agreement on 23 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 July 2013, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with New Zealand with a view to concluding an Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters (‘the Agreement’). The negotiations were successfully concluded by the initialling of the Agreement on 23 September 2015.

| (2) | The purpose of the Agreement is to establish the legal basis for a cooperation framework which aims to secure the supply chain and facilitate legitimate trade, as well as enable the exchange of information to ensure the proper application of customs legislation and the prevention, investigation and combating of breaches of customs legislation. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The purpose of the Agreement is to establish the legal basis for a cooperation framework which aims to secure the supply chain and facilitate legitimate trade, as well as enable the exchange of information to ensure the proper application of customs legislation and the prevention, investigation and combating of breaches of customs legislation.

| (3) | The Agreement should be signed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be signed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of that Agreement (1).

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 10 October 2016.

For the Council

The President

G. MATEČNÁ

---

(1)  The text of the Agreement will be published together with the decision on its conclusion.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement of Discover Bank and Discover Card Execution Note Trust (Registration Numbers 333-141703, 333-141703-01, and 333-141703-02) on Form S-3 of our Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm datedFebruary 13, 2009, relating to Management’s Assertions on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Discover Card Execution Note Trust for the year ended November 30, 2008, and to thereference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago, Illinois 

February 18, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jeremy James SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-7936.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 29, 2004.

Decided May 6, 2004.

Jeremy James Smith, Appellant pro se.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*157PER CURIAM.

Jeremy James Smith, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
WALTER WALLS, LLC, Appellant, v. BOSON FLORIDA, LLC, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 3D18-55 & 3D17-1465

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

Roman Groysman (Fort Lauderdale); Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel and Mark F. Raymond, for appellant.

Krinzman Huss & Lubetsky and Cary A. Lubetsky and Salvatore H. Fasulo ; Rodrigo S. Da Silva ; Shapiro Ramos and Cynthia M. Ramos, for appellees.

Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9                     
<CIK>                         0000710507
<NAME>                        First Banks, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         134,230
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,147
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                32,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 4,502
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    639,457
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,129
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      3,232,240
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (55,591) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,275,463
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,783,772
<SHORT-TERM>                                    63,086
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             49,846
<LONG-TERM>                                    134,284
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     13,063
<COMMON>                                         5,915
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,275,463
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                136,170
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               21,710
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,990
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               159,870
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              76,695 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,722
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           78,148
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,950 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 256
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 67,096 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,253
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      23,253
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   588.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   568.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.25
<LOANS-NON>                                     33,800
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,738
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   830
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 24,271
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                50,509
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   (4,138)
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,385
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               55,591
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            55,951 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,749
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000710182
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       15,390
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        600
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             450
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,795
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,235
<COMMON>                                         3,590
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                         (12)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              2,871
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   6,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              844
<PREFERRED>                                        115
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             5,117
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 148
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      528
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   5,034
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   18,235
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,285
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                45
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,007
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,052
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            233
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 (2)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     231
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           126
<NET-INCOME>                                       106
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          3
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      103
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          112
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
SEALED APPELLANT, petitioner, v. SEALED APPELLEE 1, et al.

No. 12M124.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
Dwayne Steve PRYCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-661

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

Lasertechnics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Nine Months Ended September 30,         Three Months Ended September 30,
                                       -------------------------------         --------------------------------
                                           1996               1995                  1996               1995
                                       ------------       ------------         -------------       ------------
<S>                                    <C>                <C>                  <C>                <C> 
Shares outstanding:                                                                          
                                                                                             
Weighted average shares outstanding:     33,095,445         26,750,293            35,010,585         28,528,745
                                                                                             
Net loss applicable to common stock    $ (8,494,501)      $ (6,216,941)         $ (2,416,168)      $ (1,866,174)
                                                                                             
Net loss per share                     $      (0.26)             (0.23)                (0.07)             (0.07)
                                       ============       ============          ============       ============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 12
 TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,2009(Dollars in millions)Loss before income taxes
    
    $
    (238
    )Fixed Charges:Interest on debt
    
    
    128Estimated interest portion of rents
    
    
    2Total fixed charges
    
    
    130Adjusted loss
    
    $
    (108
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
    
    
    (0.84
    )x
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing loss before income taxes
and fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental
expense as representative of interest portion of rentals. Additional earnings of $238 million
would have been necessary to bring the ratio of earnings to fixed charges to 1.0.
STATE of Louisiana v. Chicobi SMITH

No. 2019-KK-1035

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 22, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 24TH JUDICAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

Writ denied.

CLARK, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

*267I would grant and docket the State's writ application to re-examine the holding of *State v. Jackson* , namely that the trial judge must inform the jury, upon request by defendant, of the statutory penalty to be imposed upon defendant if he or she is found guilty when the penalty is mandatory life imprisonment. 450 So. 2d 621, 633-34 (La. 1984). *See* , *e.g.* , *State v. Harris* , 258 La. 720, 247 So. 2d 847, 851 (1971) ("[W]hen the penalty is the responsibility of the judge alone, the sentencing law is an improper subject for argument to the jury."); *State v. Guidry* , 2016-1412 (La. 3/15/17), 221 So. 3d 815, 830 (Crichton, J. concurring) ("The Louisiana Constitution imbues the legislature with the sole authority to define conduct as criminal and provide penalties for such conduct. La. Const. art. 3, § I ; *State v. Taylor* , 479 So.2d 339, 341 (La. 1985) ... 'the jury is the judge of the law and of the facts on the question of guilt or innocence,' but the court imposes the penalty in non-capital cases. La. C.Cr.P. arts. 802, 871.").
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2010 of Fresh Start Private Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Andrew Aird, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: November 7, 2011
/s/ ANDREW AIRDAndrew Aird

President, Secretary Treasurer,

Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and Director