alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Javier ENRIQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Juan C. SUAREZ, petitioner, v. Derral G. ADAMS, Warden.

No. 12-8752.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Leo C. ARNONE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, petitioner, v. Ahmed Kenyatta EBRON.

No. 12-924.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual
capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



SOUTHWEST BANK, TRUSTEE FOR SABINE ROYALTY
TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper
SVP, Royalty Trust Management


Date: May 8, 2015

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
James BELL, petitioner, v. Steven RIVARD, Warden.

No. 12-8492.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                            Castle Energy Corporation
                 Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                              Three Months Ended December 31,
                                                            --------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       1996                                    1995
                                                            -----------------------------         ------------------------------
                                                                                Fully                                   Fully
                                                              Primary          Diluted               Primary           Diluted
                                                              -------          -------               -------           -------

<S>                                                             <C>              <C>                   <C>               <C>      
     I.  Shares Outstanding, Net of Treasury
            Stock Purchased During the Period:

                 Stock, net                                     6,693,646        6,693,646             6,693,646         6,693,646
                 Purchase of treasury stock (weighted)             (1,865)          (1,865)                -                 -
                                                             ------------     ------------           -----------        ----------
                                                                6,691,781        6,691,781             6,693,646         6,693,646

    II.  Weighted Equivalent Shares:

                Assumed options and warrants exercised             25,696           36,928                18,095            23,397
                                                             ------------     ------------           -----------        ----------

   III.  Weighted Average Shares and Equivalent Shares          6,717,477        6,728,709             6,711,741         6,717,043
                                                             ============     ============           ===========        ==========

    IV.  Net Income                                          $      2,236     $      2,236           $     5,494        $    5,494
                                                             ============     ============           ===========        ==========

     V.  Net Income Per Share                                $        .33     $        .33           $       .82        $      .82
                                                             ============     ============           ===========        ==========


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10985]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[NM-070-5101-09-G010; NMNM91469]


Notice of Right-of-Way Application; New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An application, serialized as NMNM91469, was received from El 
Paso Natural Gas Company (EPNG) for a natural gas pipeline right-of-way 
in San Juan County, New Mexico.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 28 of the Mineral 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 USC 185), as amended by the Act of November 16, 
1973, (37 Stat. 576), EPNG has applied for a right-of-way for 36 inch 
diameter pipeline that is 5.20 miles in length. An additional 11.00 
miles would be located on land administered by the Bureau of Indian 
Affairs. The project would loop existing lines and will help relieve 
line pressure and also help in accommodating projected volumes. The 
proposed line crosses the following public lands.

New Mexico Principal Meridian

T. 29 N., R. 11 W.,
    Sec. 9, SE\1/4\/SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 10, lot 4, SW\1/4\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 16, N\1/2\NE\1/4\, SW\1/4\NE\1/4\, E\1/2\W\1/4\, NW\1/
4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 20, E\1/2\NE\1/4\, N\1/2\SE\1/4\, SW\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 21, N\1/4\NW\1/4\, SW\1/4\NW\1/4\;
    Sec. 29, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, N\1/2\NW\1/4\, SW\1/4\NW\1/4\.
T. 29 N., R. 11 W.,
    Sec. 27, W\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 33, lot 1, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 34, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, E\1/2\NW\1/4\, SW\1/4\NW\1/4\, NW\1/
4\SW\1/4\.

    The purpose of this notice is to inform the public that the Bureau 
will be making a decision on approval of the right-of-way, and if so, 
under what terms and conditions.
    Interested persons desiring to express their views should promptly 
send their name and address to the District Manager, Bureau of Land 
Management, 1235 La Plata Highway, Farmington, New Mexico 87401 within 
30 days of publication of this notice. Additional information can be 
obtained by contacting Jerry Crockford at (505) 599-6333.

    Dated: April 28, 1995.
Robert Moore,
Acting Assistant District Manager for Resources.
[FR Doc. 95-10985 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00344-CR

Antonio Leonard Brown

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 89th District Court

of Wichita County (53,525-C)

June 18, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
Gregory James RUSSELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,130,800
<SECURITIES>                                84,928,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,651,600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,178,600
<PP&E>                                       5,361,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             295,428,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,113,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,829,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,968,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               295,428,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,225,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,073,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               115,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,231,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,218,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                   339,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            879,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   879,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 15






TXU US Holdings Company:


We have made a review,  in accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited condensed
consolidated  interim  financial  information  of TXU US  Holdings  Company  (US
Holdings) and  subsidiaries for the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2002 and 2001, as indicated in our report dated  November 13, 2002;  because
we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report  referred  to above,  which is  included in US
Holdings'  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September  30,
2002, is  incorporated  by reference in  Registration  Statements No.  33-69554,
333-53296, 333-53296-01, 333-53296-02 and 333-53296-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned  report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities  Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 14, 2002
# L_2018237EN.01000201.xml

| 20.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 237/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 237/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/1252

of 18 September 2018

on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People's Republic of China in connection with DS492 European Union — Measures affecting Tariff Concessions on Certain Poultry Meat Products

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 12 March 2018, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations on a mutually agreed solution with China in connection with the WTO dispute settlement proceedings DS492 European Union — Measures affecting Tariff Concessions on Certain Poultry Meat Products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 12 March 2018, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations on a mutually agreed solution with China in connection with the WTO dispute settlement proceedings DS492 European Union — Measures affecting Tariff Concessions on Certain Poultry Meat Products.

| (2) | The negotiations have been concluded and an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and China (‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 18 June 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The negotiations have been concluded and an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and China (‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 18 June 2018.

| (3) | The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion at a later date, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion at a later date,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing on behalf of the Union of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People's Republic of China in connection with DS492 European Union — Measures affecting Tariff Concessions on Certain Poultry Meat Products is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement (1).

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2018.

For the Council

The President

G. BLÜMEL

---

(1)  The text of the Agreement will be published together with the decision on its conclusion.

1

---
exv4w6






Exhibit 4.6




FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE

RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

HOME BANCSHARES, INC.




          Pursuant to the Arkansas Business Corporation Act of 1987, Home BancShares, Inc. (the
“Corporation”) does hereby adopt the following articles of amendment to its Restated
Articles of Incorporation, dated March 12, 1999, as previously amended on October 23, 2003, March
9, 2005, April 18, 2005, and May 9, 2007:




          1. Article THIRD is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:




          THIRD: The authorized capital stock (the “Capital Stock”) of this Corporation shall
be 50,000,000 shares of voting common stock (the “Common Stock”) having a par value of
$0.01 per share, and 5,500,000 shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock (the “Preferred
Stock”). The Board of Directors of the Corporation, acting pursuant to the authority contained
herein and under Arkansas law, without any vote of the shareholders of the Corporation, may issue
shares of Preferred Stock in one or more series and may determine the preferences, limitations,
relative rights and terms of the Preferred Stock or any series of shares of the Preferred Stock
before the issuance of such shares of Preferred Stock or series of shares of the Preferred Stock.
Before issuing any shares of Preferred Stock or any series of shares of the Preferred Stock, the
Corporation, if required by Arkansas law, shall file with the Secretary of State of Arkansas
Articles of Amendment containing the text of the amendment, preferences, limitations, relative
rights and terms of the Preferred Stock or of such series of Preferred Stock.




          Voting Rights. The Common Stock shall have one vote per share on all matters
submitted to the shareholders for a vote. No holder of Common Stock shall have the right to
cumulate their votes in the election of directors.



          Dividends. Dividends may not be declared unless the requirements for the payment of
dividends under Arkansas law are met, and are payable only if and to the extent that the Board of
Directors determines that earnings are available. No interest shall be payable on any declared and
unpaid dividends.




          EXECUTED this 9th day of January, 2009.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	     /s/ C. Randall Sims
 

C. Randall Sims, Secretary
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

___________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 131994(66) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 131994 

v COA: 259532 

Saginaw CC: 04-024226-FC 

TRUMON DONTAE CANNON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension 

of the time for filing their brief and appendix is considered and the time is extended to 

November 20, 2007. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 30, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24629-24630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11336]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT95-10-001]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 13, 1995, pursuant to Sec. 154.62 of the 
Commission's Regulations and in compliance with the Commission's March 
17, 1995, order in Docket No. GT95-10-000, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) submitted for filing executed Section 7(c) 
service contracts, listed on Appendix A of the filing, between Texas 
Eastern, as pipeline, and its Customers under its firm Rate Schedules 
FTS, FTS-2, FTS-4, FTS-5, FTS-7, FTS-8, CTS and SS.
    Texas Eastern requests that the Commission waive all necessary 
rules and regulations to permit the contracts listed on Appendix A of 
the filing to become effective on the first day of the primary term as 
stated in each contract.
    Texas Eastern states that a copy of the transmittal letter and the 
attached contracts are being sent to the listed customers on the 
Appendix.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, [[Page 24630]] 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 
211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 18 CFR 385.211. 
All such protests should be filed on or before May 10, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11336 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
H. R. 1270

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the Leaking Underground

Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK

TRUST FUND FINANCING RATE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 4081(d) of the

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to Leaking Underground

Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate) is amended by striking

‘‘April 1, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2005’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this section

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Case No. 3:17-cv-00152-VC

THE PARTIES’ UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

SHAUN SETAREH (SBN 204514)

shaun@setarehlaw.com

THOMAS SEGAL (SBN 222791)

thomas@setarehlaw.com

SETAREH LAW GROUP

9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Telephone: (310) 888-7771

Facsimile: (310) 888-0109

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

MARCUS CHISM

THOMAS M. MCINERNEY (SBN 162055)

tmm@ogletree.com

JASON P. BROWN (SBN 266472)

jason.brown@ogletree.com

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

Steuart Tower, Suite 1300

One Market Plaza

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 442-4810

Facsimile: (415) 442-4870

STEPHEN R. WOODS, (pro hac vice)

stephen.woods@ogletree.com

JAMES R. SILVERS, (pro hac vice) 

james.silvers@ogletree.com

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

300 North Main Street, Suite 500

Greenville, SC 29601

Telephone: (864) 271-1300 

Facsimile: (864) 235-8806 

Attorneys for Defendant

FRITO-LAY, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS CHISM, on behalf of himself, all 

others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PEPSICO, INC., a North Carolina 

Corporation; FRITO-LAY, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation; FIRST ADVANTAGE 

BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP., a 

Florida Corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, 

Inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00152-VC

THE PARTIES’ UPDATED JOINT CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERNECE 

STATEMENT

Date: January 30, 2018

Time: 1:30 PM

Courtroom: 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco

The Hon. Vince Chhabria

Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 84 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 Case No. 3:17-cv-00152-VC

THE PARTIES’ UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

The parties have reviewed items 1 through 21 of the Initial Joint Case Management 

Conference Statement [Dkt. No. 39 filed May 2, 2017] and provide the following update:

12. Settlement and ADR

The remaining parties have reached a settlement in principle of this case. The parties have 

traded several drafts of the formal memorandum of understanding and expect to finalize the details 

in the next fourteen (14) days. Thereafter, the parties expect that a long-form settlement agreement 

will be presented to the Court for preliminary approval within thirty (30) days of the completion of 

the Memorandum of Understanding. 

Dated: January 24, 2018 /s/ Shaun Setareh

Shaun Setareh

Law Group

Dated: January 24, 2018 /s/ Jason P. Brown 

Jason P. Brown

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & 

Stewart, P.C.

LOCAL RULE 5-1 ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that the concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories shown above.

Dated: January 24, 2018 /s/Jason P. Brown

Jason P. Brown

Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 84 Filed 01/24/18 Page 2 of 2