alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11016]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-51, RM-8591]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Shingletown, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed by Mark C. Allen, seeking the allotment of Channel 232A to 
Shingletown, California, as that community's second local FM service. 
Coordinates used for this proposal are North Latitude 40-29-33 and West 
Longitude 121-53-17.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 22, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before July 7, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, 
D.C. 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested 
parties should serve the petitioner, as follows: Mark C. Allen, 3745 
McHale Way, Redding, CA 96001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-51, adopted April 19, 
1995, and released May 1, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 
140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-11016 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10997]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

CNO Planning and Steering Advisory Committee; Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given that the Planning and Steering 
Advisory Committee will meet May 17, 1995, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 
at the Center for Naval Analyses, 4401 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, 
Virginia. This session will be closed to the public.

    The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss topics relevant to 
SSBN Security. The entire agenda will consist of classified information 
that is specifically authorized by Executive order to be kept secret in 
the interest of national defense and are, in fact, properly classified 
pursuant to such Executive order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the 
Navy has determined in writing that all sessions of the meeting shall 
be closed to the public because they will be concerned with matters 
listed in section 552b(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code.

    For further information concerning this meeting, contact: LCDR R. 
F. Brese, Pentagon, Room 4D534, Washington, DC 20350, Phone: (703) 693-
7248.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
L.R. McNees,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-10997 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            6500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       26
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6526
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               86
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        6441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6526
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   156
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     27
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 27
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        27
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
Order entered December 3 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00685 - CV CITY OF HEATH, Appellant

V. ROBERT WILLIAMSON D/B/A PCNETSYS, Appellee On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1 - 19 - 1576

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s December 1, 2020 unopposed second motion for extension of time to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be f iled no later than January 11, 202 1 . Because this is an accelerated appeal, we caution that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Cheri LOWE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8650.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Jacinto VELASQUEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          25,990
<SECURITIES>                                   747,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,436,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    189,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,781,134
<PP&E>                                         810,947
<DEPRECIATION>                                 721,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,826,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,243,015
<BONDS>                                        231,029
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,643
<OTHER-SE>                                     348,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,826,804
<SALES>                                        832,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               832,952
<CGS>                                          501,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  752,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Antonio CLARK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-321

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Tamatha Michelle Money HILTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9128.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Manuel CUSTODIO, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-8110.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF EXPERIAN –- CHICOINE V PHEAA, NO. 3:17-CV-00926 JST

Page 1 of 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark F. Anderson (SBN 44787) 

ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER LLP

1736 Stockton Street, Ground Floor 

San Francisco, California 94133 

Telephone: (415) 651-1951 

Fax: (415) 500-8300 

Email: mark@aoblawyers.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Heather L. Chicoine 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HEATHER L. CHICOINE,

Plaintiff,

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCTION 

ASSISTANCE AGENCY, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:17-cv-00926 JST

(proposed) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

Based on the parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, plaintiff Heather L. Chicoine’s 

claims against defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) are hereby dismissed 

with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 41(a)(2). 

Date: May 8, 2017 

 

 _____________________________________ 

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00926-JST Document 24 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP FRANTIN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00894-SI (SI)

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER

(CIVIL)

It is hereby ORDERED pursuant to F.R.C.P. and the Local Rules of this Court:

FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT: October 27, 2017 at 3:00 PM.

Counsel must file a joint case management statement seven days in advance of the 

conference.

DISCOVERY PLAN: Per F.R.Civ.P and Local Rules, subject to any provisions below.

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is: December 15, 2017.

DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: 11/3/17; REBUTTAL: 11/17/17;

Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2).

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is: December 15, 2017.

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by; January 26, 2018;

Opp. Due: February 9, 2018; Reply Due: February 16, 2018;

and set for hearing no later than March 2, 2018 at 9:00 AM.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: April 10, 2018 at 3:30 PM.

JURY TRIAL DATE: April 23, 2018 at 8:30 AM.

Courtroom 1, 17th floor.

TRIAL LENGTH is estimated to be days.

SPECIAL DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL PROVISIONS:

Deft. Sky Eagle Holdings Corp. Eagle Electric Shenshen will be dismissed by 6/16/17.

The parties have agreed to participate in private mediation. Counsel shall inform the Court 

of the name of the mediator and date of the mediation session by the end of June 2017. The 

mediation session shall occur by the end of September 2017.
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The pretrial conference SHALL be attended by trial counsel prepared to discuss all aspects 

of the case, including settlement. Parties SHALL conform to the attached instructions. 

Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on any party subsequently joined in this 

action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

____________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

6/12/17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ )

OLIVER J. HIGGINS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 10

- 1485 (RLW)

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT )

OF JUSTICE, et al.

, )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The defendants filed a renewed motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 36] on March

21, 2013

. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligation under the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned the

plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by April 26, 2013, the Court would treat the

motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested more

time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat the defendants’ motion as conceded.

With this ruling, no issues remain for the Cou rt’s resolution, and final judgment will be

entered in favor of the defendants. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: May 14, 2013

ROBERT L. WILKINS

United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

DIANA ROHRER, Individually and ) 

DIANA ROHRER and DAWN ) 

CUBBERNUSS as Co-Administrators of ) 

the ESTATE OF DANIEL RICHARD ) 

ROHRER, Deceased, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Case No.: 3:12-cv-749 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. aka NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER, ) 

AMERIDOSE LLC, and ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC, and ) 

BARRY CADDEN and LISA CADDEN, ) 

Individually, and GREGORY ) 

CONIGLIARO, Individually, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT 

ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

 Plaintiffs, by counsel, hereby move this Court for an extension of time to respond to 

Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC’s (hereinafter “Alaunus”) Motion to Dismiss, up to and 

including March 28, 2013. Plaintiffs’ response is currently due February 26, 2013. Alaunus’ 

counsel has been consulted and has no objection to the requested extension. 

 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Plaintiffs up to and 

including March 28, 2013 to respond to Defendant Alaunus’ Motion to Dismiss, and for all other 

relief just and proper in the premises. 

Dated: February 20, 2013 

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 21 filed 02/20/13 page 1 of 2
 Respectfully submitted: 

 PRICE WAICUKAUSKI & RILEY, LLC 

 s/ Jamie R. Kendall 

 William N. Riley (#14941-49) 

 Jamie R. Kendall (#25124-49A) 

 301 Massachusetts Avenue 

 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 

 (317) 633-8787 

 (317) 633-8797 Fax 

 E-Mail: wriley@price-law.com

 jkendall@price-law.com 

 Counsel for Plaintiffs 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that an exact and true copy of the foregoing has been filed electronically 

on this 20th day of February, 2013. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following party by 

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the 

Court’s system: 

Dina M. Cox 

Kameela Shaheed-Diallo 

Robert M. Baker, IV 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202-3199 

dcox@lewiswagner.com

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

rbaker@lewiswagner.com

Knight S. Anderson 

TUCKER ELLIS LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

knight.anderson@tuckerellis.com

Richard W. Crowder 

211 South Third Street 

Goshen, IN 46256 

crowderlaw@gmail.com

 s/ Jamie R. Kendall 

 Jamie R. Kendall 

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 21 filed 02/20/13 page 2 of 2
Robert TIRAN, petitioner, v. Jeffrey WOODS, Warden.

No. 12-8583.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
3.4(d)



NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 6

AMENDMENT TO THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT



This AMENDMENT (this Amendment) dated as of July 20, 2006, to the PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (the Partnership Agreement) of NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 6, a California limited partnership (the Partnership), is entered into by the undersigned.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 16 of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners who own more than 50% of the outstanding units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership (Units) have consented in writing to this Amendment to the Partnership Agreement; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Partnership Agreement the Managing General Partner may execute this Amendment to the Partnership Agreement on behalf of the Partnership and the Limited Partners;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

1.

Section 4 of the Partnership Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

The Partnership commenced as of the 15th day of October, 1982, and shall continue until the 31st day of December, 2022, unless previously terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Partnership Agreement.



2.

Except as amended and modified by this Amendment, all other terms of the Partnership Agreement shall remain unchanged.

3.

This Amendment shall be governed by and construed as to validity, enforcement, interpretations, construction, effect and in all other respects by the internal laws of the State of California.

4.

All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Partnership Agreement.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and their respective signatures to be hereunto affixed and attested, all as of the day and year first above written.



Managing General Partner:



NPI EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.





By:

/s/ Martha Long

Name:

Martha L. Long

Title:

Senior Vice President
1























































01980-00104/9513607.1

WAYMO’S RESPONSE TO ORDER RE INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA SEARCHES OF JURORS 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502)

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887)

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886)

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4788

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

WAYMO’S RESPONSE TO ORDER RE 

INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA 

SEARCHES OF JURORS

Judge: The Honorable William Alsup

Trial Date: October 10, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1361 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01980-00104/9513607.1

-1-

WAYMO’S RESPONSE TO ORDER RE INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA SEARCHES OF JURORS 

Pursuant to the Court’s August 18, 2017 Order Re Internet and Social Medial Searches of 

Jurors (Dkt. 1262), Waymo hereby submits the following response:

Waymo consents in this case to a ban against Internet research on the venire or the empaneled 

jury until the trial is over, and also respectfully requests one hour for it to conduct voir dire of the 

prospective jurors. 

DATED: August 25, 2017 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By /s/ Charles K. Verhoeven

Charles K. Verhoeven

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1361 Filed 08/25/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.2
  Section
1350 Certification




In connection with the annual report of Monarch
Investment Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June
30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
Phillip Bloom, principal financial and accounting officer certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      August 12, 2010
            /s/ Phillip
      Bloom


Phillip
      Bloom, principal financial and accounting
  officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Keith A. BROWN, petitioner, v. John VALDEZ, et al.

No. 12-8871.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Robert ZLATKOVSKIY, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 12-1171.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.
Marvin GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9099.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Leshae A. ASHLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.