alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



QUEST ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
ANNUAL CERTIFICATION
 I, Jerry D. Cash, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quest Energy Partners, L.P.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986];c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Jerry D. CashJerry D. CashChief Executive Officer
News Release pursuant to Rule 12h-6(h)



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 CONTACT INFORMATION 

			
	 USA:
 Phil O’Shaughnessy
 (408) 546-6773
 poshaughnessy@creative.com
	  	 Asia:
 Wynne Leong
 (65) 6895-4120
 wynne.leong@ctl.creative.com


 Creative Technology Ltd Intends to File 
 Form 15F to Terminate SEC Registration and Reporting Obligation 
 SINGAPORE – February 12, 2009 — Creative Technology Ltd. (“Creative” or the “Company”) announces that it intends to file a Form 15F with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to voluntarily terminate the registration of its Ordinary Shares under Section 12(g) as well as its reporting obligations under Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Pursuant to Rule 12h-6 under the Exchange Act, the SEC permits a foreign private issuer to terminate the registration of a class of securities under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act if it meets
certain requirements. Upon the filing of the Form 15F, the Company’s reporting obligations under the Exchange Act will be suspended immediately and will terminate no more than 90 days after the filing, barring any objections from the SEC.

 The Company decided to terminate the registration to reduce the administrative workload and costs associated with meeting specific SEC
reporting requirements under the Exchange Act, which are in addition to the Company’s reporting obligations under Singapore law. 
 The
Company’s Ordinary Shares will continue to be listed and trade on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (“SGX-ST”). As a SGX-ST listed reporting issuer, the Company will continue to file its continuing disclosure documents
with the applicable Singapore securities regulators. 
 About Creative 
 Creative is a worldwide leader in digital entertainment products. Famous for its Sound Blaster® sound cards and for launching the multimedia revolution, Creative is now driving digital entertainment on the PC platform with products like its highly acclaimed ZEN® MP3 and portable media players. Creative’s innovative hardware, proprietary technology, applications and services leverage the Internet, enabling consumers to experience high-quality digital entertainment –
anytime, anywhere.
Edward ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-0509

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Franklin v. State*, 258 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 2018).
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE ORDER FILED

UNDER SEAL

Upon agreement by both sides, counsel for either side may choose to share with the

special master or separate counsel for Levandowski copies of the order, titled “Questions for

Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Provisional Relief,” that was filed under seal today.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 329 Filed 05/02/17 Page 1 of 1
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, RonHooper, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine RoyaltyTrust, for which Argent Trust Company acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causingsuch controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

By:
 
/s/ Ron Hooper
 
Ron Hooper
 
SVP, Royalty Trust Services
 
Argent Trust Company

Date: May 8, 2023 

 
**
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

MIGUEL RAMON VARGAS-ZUNIGA, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-10359 

D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00816-SMB-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges. 

Miguel Ramon Vargas-Zuniga appeals from the district court’s judgment 

and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry of a 

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Vargas-Zuniga’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 7 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-10359 

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

We have provided Vargas-Zuniga the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental 

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Vargas-Zuniga waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our 

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United 

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss 

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1294 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1294

To amend title 11, United States Code, to establish a priority for the 
  payment of claims for duties paid to the United States by licensed 
          customs brokers and sureties on behalf of a debtor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11, United States Code, to establish a priority for the 
  payment of claims for duties paid to the United States by licensed 
          customs brokers and sureties on behalf of a debtor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Customs Business Fairness Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(10) Tenth, allowed unsecured claims of customs brokers 
        (as defined in section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930) and 
        sureties (as provided in section 623 of the Tariff Act of 1930) 
        for duties, taxes, or other charges paid to the Bureau of 
        Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland 
        Security on behalf of the debtor arising out of the importation 
        of merchandise entered for consumption within one year before 
        the date of the filing of the petition.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by this Act shall 
apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11, United 
States Code, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the
Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
SABINE ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper,Senior Vice President, Royalty Management Date: November 4, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John J. Quicke, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Steel Excel Inc. for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 (the "Form 10-Q"), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Steel Excel Inc. for the quarterly periods covered by the Form 10-Q.





/s/ John J. QuickeDate: August 9, 2012
John J. Quicke

Interim President and Chief Executive Officer








I, Mark A. Zorko, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Form 10-Q, that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Steel Excel Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.





/s/ Mark A. ZorkoDate: August 9, 2012
Mark A. Zorko

Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MINUTE ORDER 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken, Presiding 

Date: August 14, 2018 Time: FTR: 3:07-3:56 

Deputy Clerk: Doug Merry 

Case No.: 17-cv-00755-CW

Case Name: Quintanilla Vasquez v. Libre by Nexus, Inc. 

Appearances for Plaintiff: Annick Persinger, Jesse Newmark, Tanya 

Koshy 

Appearances for Defendant: Michael Simmonds, Michael Gorby, Tomio 

Narita 

Proceedings: Motion for Sanctions, Motion to Compel, Motion to 

Dismiss - held 

Counsel argues the motions before the Court. 

The Court takes the matters under submission and will issue a 

written ruling.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

KEITH M. ABBOTT

, * No. 11

- 550 V

*

Petitioner, * Special Master Moran

*

v. * Filed: April 14, 2015

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * in the amount to which

* respondent does not object.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ramon Rodriguez, III

, Rawls, McNelis & Mitchell

, P.C., Richmond, VA , for

Petitioner;

Debra Begley

, U nited States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC

, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

On April 10, 2015 , respondent filed a stipulation of fact concerning final

attorneys’ fees and costs in the above

- captioned matter. Previously, petitioner

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent

for review. Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections

to certain items. Based on subseque nt disc ussions, petitioner amended his

application to request $80,850.00 , an amount to which respondent does not object.

The Court awards this amount.

On August 30, 2011

, Keith Abbott filed a petition for compensation alleging

that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine , which he received on September 8, 2008 , caused

him to develop neuromuscular symptoms and/or fibromyalgia . Petitioner received

compensation based upon the parties’ stipulation. Decision , issued Oct. 3 , 2 014

.

1 T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical inf ormation or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Because petitioner received compensat ion, he is entitled to an award of attorneys’

fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

Petitioner seeks a total of $80,850.00

, in atto rneys’ fees and costs for his

counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states

that he incurred $52.25

, in out

- of

- pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this

claim. Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees

and costs.

After r eviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

a. A lump sum of $80,850.00

, in the form of a check made payable to

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Ramon Rodriguez, III , for

attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. §

3 00aa

- 15(e).

b. A lump sum of $52.25 , payable to petitioner, Keith M. Abbott , for

costs he incurred in pursuit of h is petition.

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk , Mary Holmes, at (202) 357

-

6360

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010.  The undersigned hereby certify that to our knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   October 13, 2010





/s/ Fred Zolla


Fred Zolla


President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2018331EN.01022401.xml

| 28.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 331/224 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 331/224

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2018/2078

of 21 December 2018

amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 December 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 December 2015.

| (3) | On 5 July 2018, the Council renewed Decision 2014/512/CFSP until 31 January 2019 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements (2). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 5 July 2018, the Council renewed Decision 2014/512/CFSP until 31 January 2019 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements (2).

| (4) | Having assessed the implementation of the Minsk agreements, Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further six months in order to enable the Council to further assess their implementation. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Having assessed the implementation of the Minsk agreements, Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further six months in order to enable the Council to further assess their implementation.

| (5) | Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘1.   This Decision shall apply until 31 July 2019.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2018.

For the Council

The President

J. BOGNER-STRAUSS

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 13).

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/964 of 5 July 2018 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 172, 9.7.2018, p. 3).

2

---