alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00573-CR

Dominic Stefan ANDERSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-2309-CR-A

The Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The court reporter’s notification of late record is NOTED. Time is extended to December 

28, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH WAYNE ROBERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00874-HSG (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In a notice dated February 22, 2017, the Clerk of the Court directed Plaintiff to complete a 

civil rights complaint form and an in forma pauperis (IFP) application, and told him that he must 

complete these documents within twenty-eight days or his action would be dismissed. The Clerk 

sent Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form as well as a prisoner’s IFP application. 

More than twenty-eight days have passed, and Plaintiff has not filed the necessary 

documents or otherwise communicated with the Court. 

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter 

judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

5/10/2017
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01980-00104/9529972.1

Case No.3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

WAYMO’S STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO COURT’S QUESTIONS REGARDING TRADE SECRET NO. 96

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502)

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887)

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886)

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4788

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

PLAINTIFF WAYMO LLC’S 

STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO 

COURT’S QUESTIONS REGARDING 

TRADE SECRET NUMBER 96

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1457 Filed 09/05/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01980-00104/9529972.1

-2- Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

WAYMO’S STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO COURT’S QUESTIONS REGARDING TRADE SECRET NO. 96

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Further Hearing on Motion to Strike Asserted Trade 

Secret Number 96 (Dkt. 1408) and Supplement thereto (Dkt. 1416), Plaintiff Waymo LLC 

(“Waymo”) hereby submits this statement.

Waymo states that its responses to the Court’s questions regarding Trade Secret No. 96 are 

provided in the Declaration of Lambertus Hesselink, Ph.D. filed herewith.

DATED: September 5, 2017 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP

By /s/ Charles K. Verhoeven

Charles K. Verhoeven

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1457 Filed 09/05/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:12-CR-128(3) RM

)

ALVIN BLADE, III )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on March 19, 2013 [Doc. No. 97].

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendation,

ACCEPTS defendant Alvin Blade’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty

of Count 3 the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: April 11, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 800 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 800

   Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Mississippi Farm Bureau 
                              Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2022

 Mrs. Hyde-Smith (for herself and Mr. Wicker) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           November 17, 2022

           Considered and agreed to with an amended preamble

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Mississippi Farm Bureau 
                              Federation.

Whereas the American Farm Bureau was created in 1919 to disseminate college 
        research results to farmers;
Whereas, since 1919, the American Farm Bureau has since grown into one of the 
        strongest advocacy organizations in the United States, with 6,000,000 
        members and affiliated services and member benefits that include highly 
        respected insurance companies;
Whereas the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation was officially chartered on 
        October 30, 1922, in Jackson, Mississippi, as a proud state affiliate of 
        the American Farm Bureau;
Whereas C.L. Neill of Jones County was elected as the first president of the 
        Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation;
Whereas the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation is a strong voice of agriculture 
        for farmers, ranchers, and rural Mississippians;
Whereas the mission of the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation is to create an 
        environment in which Mississippi farmers, ranchers, and Farm Bureau 
        members can have a better life and make a better living; and
Whereas October 30, 2022, marks the 100th anniversary of the Mississippi Farm 
        Bureau Federation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) celebrates October 30, 2022, as the 100th anniversary 
        of the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation; and
            (2) commemorates the history, effective advocacy, and 
        contributions to agriculture in Mississippi of the Mississippi 
        Farm Bureau Federation.
                                 <all>
```
Richard WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9287.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
31.2


CERTIFICATION





I, Craig
Stout, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vemics, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a.  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;





b.
 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c.  
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





6.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report
whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





/s/Craig Stout


Craig
Stout


Chief
Operating Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer


Date:
October 14,
2008
Robert Dale McCOMAS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7349.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
www.fda.gov/womenshealthsafemeds 2014

Use Medicines Wisely

You take medicines to help with health problems. 

Medicines can help you live a healthier life. You 

have to be careful because medicines can also 

cause problems. There are four things you should 

do to be safe:

1. Ask questions.

2. Keep a list.

3. Follow directions.

4. Keep medicines away 

 from others. 

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Office of Women’s Health
1. ASK QUESTIONS

Ask your doctor, nurse, or pharmacist to tell you the 

facts about each medicine you take.

• 

•

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

What is the name of the medicine?

What is the medicine for?

How much do I take?

When should I take it?

How will it make me feel?

Can I take it if I am pregnant or breastfeeding?

What other medicines or foods should I avoid?

2. KEEP A MEDICINE LIST

Write down the important facts about each medicine 

you take.

• 

• 

• 

• 

List each medicine.

Include vitamins and others medications like aspirin and 

cold medicine.

Keep the list with you all the time. 

Bring it when you go to the doctor or the drug store.

Get a free My Medicines 

brochure to keep track of 

your medicines.
3. FOLLOW DIRECTIONS

Your medicine may not work if you don’t follow the directions. 

Taking too much or too little can make you very sick. 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Read the directions on the label. Your doctor, nurse, direct support 

professional, or pharmacist will tell you how much to take.

Take your medicine as your doctor, nurse, direct support professional, 

or pharmacist says you should take it. This means that you may take 

medicines at different times, like every day or every week.

Take medicine at the same time each day. 

Don’t stop taking medicine unless your doctor, nurse, direct support 

professional, or pharmacist says to. 

 

Don’t share medicines with other people. 

Check the expiration date of your medicine. This is the date that the 

medicine goes bad. It may not work or be safe for your body after this

date. Do not take any medicine after its expiration date.

 

4. SAFELY THROW OUT 

MEDICINES

Ask your doctor, nurse, direct support professional, or 

pharmacist how you should get rid of unused medicines. 

Find out if you should:

• 

• 

• 

Flush it down the toilet or sink.

Put it in a sealed plastic bag with coffee grounds or kitty litter 

and throw it in the trash.

Drop it off at a drug take-back program in your community.

Be sure to scratch off your name and personal information before

you put empty pill bottles in the trash.

Make sure that children can’t get to medicines including patches 

that you put in the trash.

Lock It Up. 

Keep your medicine 

locked in a safe place 

away from kids, teens, 

and other adults.
Avoid common mistakes 

when taking your medicines. 

Check the FDA website for 

more resources for women 

and their families.

• 

• 

• 

Get a record keeper to list your medicines.

Download a booklet to help you talk to your 

doctor, nurse, direct support professional, or 

pharmacist about medicine. 

Watch videos to learn other helpful tips. 

www.fda.gov/womenshealthsafemeds

2014

Use

Medicines

Wisely
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 4:17-cv-00644-JSW PLAINTIFF’S NTC. OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

MTN. FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP 

Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. 226112)

Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. 222187)

Virginia A. Sanderson (Bar No. 240241)

Liana W. Chen (Bar No. 296965)

150 Post Street, Suite 520 

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 955-1155 

Facsimile: (415) 955-1158

karl@KRInternetLaw.com 

jeff@KRInternetLaw.com

ginny@KRInternetLaw.com 

liana@KRInternetLaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff OrionClick LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORIONCLICK LLC, a California limited 

liability company,

Plaintiff,

v.

KELVIN INOCENT, an individual,

YMA INOCENT, an individual, IRON PEAK 

HOLDINGS, LLC, a Texas limited liability 

company dba

CONCEALEDAMERICAONLINE.COM, 

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:17-cv-00644-JSW

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF 

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR 

ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON 

DEFENDANTS KELVIN INOCENT 

AND YMA INOCENT

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS Document 20 Filed 05/18/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 4:17-cv-00644-JSW 1 PLAINTIFF’S NTC. OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

MTN. FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE

Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated May 15, 2017, and the appearance of 

Defendants in this action, Plaintiff OrionClick LLC (“Plaintiff” or “OrionClick”) hereby 

withdraws its motion for an order allowing alternative service of the Summons and 

Complaint on Defendants Kelvin Inocent and Yma Inocent (collectively, the “Individual 

Defendants”), filed in this court on March 22, 2017.

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: May 18, 2017 KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP

By: s/ Virginia Sanderson

Virginia Sanderson

Attorneys for Plaintiff OrionClick LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS Document 20 Filed 05/18/17 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0088

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LEWIS LEON BRYSON,

Defendant and Appellant. 

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until July 15, 2022, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 15 2022

06/15/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0088
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 3 2002 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. ROGELIO VILLARREAL ROCHA,

Defendant - Appellant. No. 01-3134 (D.C. No. 00-CR-20036-KHV)

(D. Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , Chief Judge, ANDERSON , Circuit Judge, and BRORBY , Senior Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Defendant Rogelio Villarreal Rocha was charged withone count of possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture or substance-2-

containing cocaine (count I) and one count of posse ssion with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture or substance conta ining methamphetamine (count II) in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) an d 18 U.S.C. § 2. Defendant pleaded guilty to count I and was sentenced to a pr ison term of 175 months in accordance with 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B), which carries a maximum prison term of forty years. Count II was dismissed on the moti on of the United States. On appeal, defendant argues his sentence violates the rule in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), in which the Court held any fact, other than the fact of a prior conviction, used to increase the pe nalty for a crime beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and p roved beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 490. Defendant argues the district court erred by including the total amount of drugs with which he was charged in count II in its calculation of the total amount of drugs attributable to defendant forsentencing purposes. Defendant’s argument is without merit. The rule in Apprendi “does not apply to sentencing factors that increase a defendant’s guideline range but do not increase the statutory maximum.” United States v. Sullivan , 255 F.3d 1256, 1265 (10th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 1182 (2002). Defendant’s sentence of 175 months does not exceed the statutory maximum of forty years. Defendant also argues he received ineffective assis tance of counsel throughout the district court proceedings. Absent certain limited circumstances-3-

not present in this case, ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be asserted in collateral proceedings, rather than on direct appeal. See United States v. Galloway , 56 F.3d 1239, 1240 (10th Cir. 1995). The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Deanell Reece Tacha Chief Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott G. McNealy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/    Scott G. McNealyName:

Scott G. McNealyTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
#### John Robert KELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

No. 02-9338.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 7, 2004.

Lee Nuwesra, New York, NY, for Appellant.

Clifford R. Atlas, Jackson Lewis LLP, New York, NY, (Steven D. Hurd, on the brief), for Appellee.

Present: CARDAMONE, JACOBS, and B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

John Robert Keller appeals from a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, *J.),*granting defendant McGraw-Hill’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his claims. Familiarity is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues.

This Court reviews the district court’s grant of summary judgment *de novo. See Young v. County of Fulton,*160 F.3d 899, 902 (2d Cir.1998). In doing so, we are required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and to draw all reasonable inferences in its favor. *See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.,*477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); *Maguire v. Citicorp Retail Servs., Inc.,*147 F.3d 232, 235 (2d Cir.1998). Summary judgment is appropriate only where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. *See Keller v. McGraw-Hill Cos.,*99 Civ. 3110, 2002 WL 31016647, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16887 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 10, 2002).

*57For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 99.14

CONSENT OF EXPERT To:
        United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549Alberta Securities CommissionBritish Columbia Securities CommissionManitoba Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionAutorité des marchés financiersNew Brunswick Securities CommissionNorthwest Territories Registrar of SecuritiesNova Scotia Securities CommissionNunavut Registrar of SecuritiesPrince Edward Island Securities OfficeSaskatchewan Financial Services CommissionSecurities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorYukon Registrar of Securitie Rio Alto Mining Limited
 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re:Technical report entitled “La Arena Project, Peru”, effectiveDecember 31st, 2014(the “Report”prepared for Rio Alto Mining Limited (the “Company") I, Greg Lane, do hereby confirm that I am a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 and a co-author of the Report. The undersigned, for himself, pursuant to Section 8.3 of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects confirms thatthis letter is being filed as the consent to the use of extracts from, or summaries of, the Report in the Company's Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "AIF") and to being named in the AIF. The undersigned further acknowledges that the AIF will be filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Form 40-F") and consents to being named in the Form 40-F and authorizes the use of the information represented therein relating to the Report. DATED the 13rdday of March 2015 By:
        /s/ Greg LaneName: Mr. Greg Lane, M Sc (F AusIMM)Company: AusencoTitle: Chief Technical Officer


---