alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv4w12








Exhibit 4.12




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	KPMG LLP	 	 
	 

	 	Chartered Accountants
	 	Telephone	 (403) 691-8000
	 

	 	2700 205 — 5th Avenue SW
	 	Fax	 (403) 691-8008
	 

	 	Calgary AB T2P 4B9
	 	Internet	 www.kpmg.ca









To the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces of Canada




Dear Sirs/Mesdames:




Re: Precision Drilling Trust (the “Trust”)




We refer to the short form base shelf prospectus of the above Trust dated February 4, 2009 relating
to offer and issue, from time to time of trust units, debt securities, warrants and subscription
receipts of the Trust.



We consent to the use, through incorporation by reference in the short form base shelf prospectus,
of our report dated March 20, 2008 to the unit holders of the Trust on the following financial
statements:




Consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2007 and 2006;




Consolidated statements of earnings and retained earnings (deficit) and cash flow for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.



We also consent to the use, through incorporation by reference in the short form base shelf
prospectus, of our report dated March 20, 2008 to the Board of Directors of Precision Drilling
Corporation as Administrator of Precision Drilling Trust and to the unit holders of the Trust on
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.



We report that we have read the short form base shelf prospectus and all information specifically
incorporated by reference therein and have no reason to believe that there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the consolidated
financial statements upon which we have reported or that are within our knowledge as a result of
our audit of such consolidated financial statements.



This letter is provided solely for the purpose of assisting the securities regulatory authorities
to which it is addressed in discharging their responsibilities and should not be used for any other
purpose. Any use that a third party makes of this letter, or any reliance or decisions based on it,
are the responsibility of such third parties. We accept no responsibility for loss or damages, if
any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this
letter.



Yours very truly,




/s/ KPMG LLP




Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada

February 4, 2009
Michael Steven RATLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4184

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 16, 2019

Michael Steven Ratley, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Michael Ratley appeals the trial court's order denying his Motion for DNA Testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. Appellant argues that the trial judge had previously disqualified himself from the underlying case and thus erred in ruling on Appellant's motion. We agree. Therefore, we vacate the order under review and remand this case to the trial court so a successor judge can rule on the motion. *See* *Davis v. State,* 849 So. 2d 1137, 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ("Once a trial judge recuses himself from a given case, any subsequent orders he enters in that case are void and have no effect."); *Adderley v. State* , 224 So. 3d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

VACATED and REMANDED .

Ray, C.J., and B.L. Thomas and Winokur, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          55,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  488,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    835,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,410,946
<PP&E>                                       9,912,624
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,013,910)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,030,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,881,786
<BONDS>                                         41,473
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,518,431
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,410,759)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,030,931
<SALES>                                     13,652,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,931,742
<CGS>                                        2,796,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,154,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,276,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             799,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,096,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,412,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,683,613)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,683,613)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)
        

</TABLE>
Luis URIAS-CRUZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10229.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Julia WAELDER, petitioner, v. QUINCY HOUSING AUTHORITY.

No. 12-9420.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

To ChoicePoint Inc.:

We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, the consolidated financial statements included in ChoicePoint
Inc.s annual report to shareholders incorporated by reference in this Form
10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated February 15, 2002. We did not
audit the 1999 consolidated financial statements of DBT Online, Inc. and
subsidiaries, a company acquired during 2000 in a transaction accounted for as
a pooling of interests as discussed in Note 2. Such statements are included in
the consolidated financial statements of ChoicePoint Inc. and reflect total
revenue of 15% of the related consolidated totals for the year ended December
31, 1999. These statements were audited by other auditors whose report has
been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts
included for DBT Online, Inc. and subsidiaries is based solely on the report of
the other auditors. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion
on those statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index is the
responsibility of the companys management and is presented for purposes of
complying with the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and is not part
of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the
auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and,
in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data
required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole.

Arthur Andersen LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 15, 2002

EXPLANATORY NOTE REGARDING REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

On March 21, 2002, ChoicePoint Inc. decided to no longer engage Arthur
Andersen LLP as its independent public accountants and engaged Deloitte &
Touche LLP to serve as its independent public accountants for the year ending
December 31, 2002. More information regarding ChoicePoint Inc.s change in
independent public accountants is contained in a current report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 22, 2002.

We could not obtain permission of Arthur Andersen LLP to the inclusion in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of their Report of Independent Public
Accountants above. Accordingly, the report of Arthur Andersen LLP above is
merely reproduced from ChoicePoint Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001 (although the financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 1999 referred to in that report are not included herein) and
does not include the manual signature of Arthur Andersen LLP.

26
H. Con. Res. 100 Agreed to March 23, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2882, the Clerk 

of the House of Representatives shall make the following correction: 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘Making further consolidated 

appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and 

for other purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
David C. BYARS & Pamela L. Byars, Appellants, v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC; Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3210

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10914]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Office of Hearings and Appeals
[Docket No. CP95-52-000]


Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Public Scoping 
Meeting and Site Inspection

April 28, 1995.
    On May 15, 1995, at 7:00 p.m., the Office of Pipeline Regulation 
environmental staff will conduct a public scoping meeting for Granite 
State Gas Transmission, Inc.; (Granite State) proposed liquefied 
natural gas (LNG) facilities in Wells, Maine. The meeting will be held 
at Wells-Ogunquit High School.
    The public meeting will be designed to give more detailed 
information and another opportunity to offer comments on the proposed 
project. Those wanting to speak at the meeting can call the 
Environmental Assessment (EA) Project Manager to preregister their 
names on the speaker list. Individuals on the speaker list before the 
date of the meeting will be allowed to speak first. A second speaker 
list will be developed at the meeting. Priority will be given to people 
representing groups. A transcript of each meeting will be made so that 
your comments will be accurately recorded.
    In addition to the public meeting, the environmental staff will 
inspect the proposed and alternative project sites on the afternoon of 
May 15, 1995. Those planning to attend must provide their own 
transportation. On May 16, 1995, at 8:30 a.m., the environmental staff 
will meet with representatives of Granite State to conduct a cryogenic 
design and engineering review of the LNG facilities proposed for Wells, 
Maine. The meeting will be held at Wells Town Hall, Route 109, Wells, 
Maine.
    For further information, call Chris Zerby, EA Project Manager, at 
(202) 208-0111.
Kevin P. Madden,
Director, Office of Pipeline Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-10914 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Nathan NUSSBAUMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2118

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 6th Floor

San Jose, CA 95110

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TANESHA COLLAZO, 

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

Case No.: 4:17-cv-00416-YGR

 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT plaintiff Tanesha Collazo and defendant Experian 

Information Solutions, Inc. by and through their respective counsel of record, have reached a 

settlement in principle of the above captioned case and are in the process of documenting said 

settlement. The parties believe the settlement will be finalized within 30 days and will request 

dismissal of this action. 

Sagaria Law, P.C.

Dated: April 19, 2017 By: /s/ Elliot Gale 

Elliot Gale

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 31 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jones Day

Dated: April 19, 2017 By: /s/ Benjamin Chung Lee

Benjamin Chung Lee

 Attorneys for Defendant

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file 

this Notice. I hereby attest that Benjamin Chung Lee has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 31 Filed 04/19/17 Page 2 of 2
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10389 Conference Calendar

__________________
FLOYD LEE SMITH, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS, DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95CV00223

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1995 Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Floyd L. Smith filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Dallas County and the Dallas County Sheriff's Department. An in forma pauperis complaint may be dismissed as frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis in fact and law. A § 1915(d) dismissal is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Ancar v. Sara Plasma, Inc. , 964 F.2d 465, 468 (5th Cir. 1992).No. 95-10389 -2- The first inquiry is whether Smith was deprived of a right secured by the Constitution. Baker v. McCollan , 443 U.S. 137, 145-48 (1979) ( § 1983 does not impose liability for duties of care arising out of tort law). The negligent act of an official that causes loss or injury will not state a claim under § 1983. Daniels v. Williams , 474 U.S. 327, 328 (1986) (addressing claim of convicted prisoner). Smith's allegation that he slipped jumping down from his bunk because the floor was wet from a leak in the roof does not suggest anything more than negligence. Marsh v. Jones , 53 F.3d 707, 712 (5th Cir. 1995) (prisoner's allegation that leaking air conditioning unit made floor wet, resulting in prisoner slipping and damaging a ring is "a garden-variety negligence claim"). Assuming Smith was a pretrial detainee, and thus giving him the benefit of a higher standard of care, he was entitled to reasonable medical care unless the failure to provide such care was reasonably related to a legitimate governmental objective. Colle v. Brazos County, Tex. , 981 F.2d 237, 244 (5th Cir. 1993). The morning following the fall, Smith was taken to Parkland Hospital where he was x-rayed, examined by a doctor, and referred to a bone specialist. The specialist informed him that his elbow was fractured and that there was nothing that could be done. Smith apparently believes that he should have been given a sling. A prisoner's disagreement with his medical treatment will not support a § 1983 claim. Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Subramanian Sundaresh, certify to the best of myknowledge based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofAdaptec, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “*Form 10-Q*”), that the Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the quarterlyperiods covered by the Form 10-Q.

|                        | By:    | /s/ SUBRAMANIAN SUNDARESH |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                   |   | Subramanian  Sundaresh    |
| Date: November 8, 2006 |   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

I, Christopher O’Meara, certify to the best of myknowledge based upon a review of the Form 10-Q, that the Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the periodscovered by the Form 10-Q.

|                        | By:    | /s/ CHRISTOPHER O’MEARA |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                   |   | Christopher O’Meara     |
| Date: November 8, 2006 |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

----
Bobby JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3425

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

Bobby Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . *Davis v. State* , 214 So. 3d 799 (Fla 1st DCA 2017).

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Medical Design Studios, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Justin Craig, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 10, 2008 /s/ Justin Craig Justin Craig Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   F-1
Exhibit 22 

Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 2 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 3 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 4 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 5 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 6 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 7 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 8 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 9 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 10 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 11 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 12 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 13 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 14 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 15 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 16 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 17 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 18 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 19 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 20 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 21 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 22 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 23 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 24 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 25 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 26 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 27 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 28 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 29 of 30
Case 4:17-cv-00458-JSW Document 37-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 30 of 30
# L_2017146EN.01000601.xml

| 9.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 146/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 146/6

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/965

of 8 June 2017

implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/150

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (1), and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 January 2017, the Council adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/150 (2) implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, establishing an updated list of persons, groups and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies (‘the list’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 January 2017, the Council adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/150 (2) implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, establishing an updated list of persons, groups and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies (‘the list’).

| (2) | The Council has determined that there are no longer grounds for keeping one of those entities on the list. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Council has determined that there are no longer grounds for keeping one of those entities on the list.

| (3) | The list should therefore be updated accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The list should therefore be updated accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The list provided for in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 8 June 2017.

For the Council

The President

U. REINSALU

---

(1)  
  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 70.

1

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/150 of 27 January 2017 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1127 (OJ L 23, 28.1.2017, p. 3).

2

---

ANNEX

The entity listed below is deleted from the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001:

II.   GROUPS AND ENTITIES

| 11. | ‘Hofstadgroep’. |
| --- | --- |

11.

---