alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SONAL N. MEHTA

ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. / CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00359-WHA

DURIE TANGRI LLP

SONAL N. MEHTA (SBN 222086)

smehta@durietangri.com

LAURA E. MILLER (SBN 271713)

lmiller@durietangri.com

CATHERINE Y. KIM (SBN 308442)

ckim@durietangri.com

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415-362-6666

Facsimile: 415-236-6300

Attorneys for Defendant 

Facebook, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SIX4THREE, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v.

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00359-WHA

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR 

SONAL N. MEHTA ON BEHALF OF 

DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.

Ctrm: 8, 19th Floor

Judge: Honorable William Alsup

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 7 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SONAL N. MEHTA

ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. / CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00359-WHA

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned of the law office of Durie Tangri LLP enters this 

Notice of Appearance for Sonal N. Mehta in the above-referenced action as counsel for Defendant 

Facebook, Inc. and hereby requests that all briefs, motions, orders, correspondence and other papers be 

served as follows:

DURIE TANGRI LLP

SONAL N. MEHTA (SBN 222086)

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Email: smehta@durietangri.com

Dated: January 25, 2017

By:

DURIE TANGRI LLP

/s/ Sonal N. Mehta

SONAL N. MEHTA

Attorneys for Defendant

Facebook, Inc.

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 7 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SONAL N. MEHTA

ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. / CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00359-WHA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 25, 2017 the within document was filed with the Clerk of the 

Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the attorneys of record in this case.

/s/ Sonal N. Mehta

SONAL N. MEHTA

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 7 Filed 01/25/17 Page 3 of 3
Mantente seguro 

junto con tu familia, 

amigos y comunidad 

reconociendo y 

combatiendo la 

desinformación.

Cómo

 identificar y combatir la

PODEMOS

 DESINFORMACIÓN

¿A qué nos referimos 

con ‘desinformación’?

Es información que se propaga de manera 

intencional e involuntaria, que es falsa, 

incorrecta o engañosa según la mejor 

evidencia disponible en ese momento. 

¿Cómo puedo identificar la desinformación?

● Verifica la fuente. Y compárala con fuentes confiables.

● Para obtener el contexto completo, no te limites solo a leer el titular.

● Comprende la intención de la publicación.

¿Por qué la desinformación se propaga tan rápido? 

● Deseamos proteger a las personas que queremos.

● Queremos sentirnos conectados.

● Nos gusta sentir que tenemos nueva información que otros no conocen.

● Es posible que busquemos explicaciones o queramos compartir 

información que nos ayude a dar sentido a los acontecimientos.

● La desinformación a menudo provoca una reacción emocional.

● La desinformación puede parecer verídica al principio si se publica fuera de 

contexto.

● Debido a estos factores, los usuarios tienden a propagar la desinformación 

más rápido que los hechos verídicos en las redes sociales.

● Todas las opiniones tienen el mismo impacto en Internet, ya sea que 

provengan de expertos o no.
¿Por qué la desinformación es dañina?

Cuando la gente cree y actúa en base a la desinformación, 

la salud pública se ve perjudicada. 

¿Qué puedes hacer cuando escucho o veo desinformación? 

Ayuda a evitar que la desinformación se propague de tres maneras:

● Identifica desinformación.

● No contribuyas a la propagación de información errónea.

● Dirige a las personas a la información de salud de fuentes confiables como la FDA y 

nuestros socios gubernamentales, incluyendo usa.gov/espanol/salud, cdc.gov/spanish/ y 

vacunas.gov

¿Cómo puedo hablar de una manera efectiva con 

mis amigos y familia sobre la desinformación? 

Cuando hables con la gente, asegúrete de: 

● escuchar ● no avergonzarlos

● sentir empatía ● usar un lenguaje inclusivo

● indicar fuentes confiables

Considera la posibilidad de compartir estos datos:

● Por su naturaleza, la ciencia está diseñada para evolucionar.

● Nuestras recomendaciones pueden cambiar a medida que la ciencia evoluciona.

● Eso no quiere decir que no debamos confiar en la ciencia. Los cambios en la información 

científica son el resultado de un conocimiento más profundo de un tema.

● Confía en la ciencia, nos ha brindado algunos de los mayores logros médicos de la 

humanidad, como poner fin a la viruela (a través de la vacunación), la teoría de los gérmenes 

(hizo que las cirugías sean mucho más seguras), y terapia génica (cura ciertos tipos de ceguera).
Todd J. BROXMEYER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10123.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7366

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VINCENT JENNELL, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior 

District Judge. (7:02-cr-00032-jct-3)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Jennell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Jennell, Jr., appeals a district court order 

denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing and appointment of 

counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s 

order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. 

See United States v. Jennell, No. 7:02-cr-00032-jct-3 (W.D. Va.

Sept. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 20, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41264

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE SAMUEL IPINA-IPINA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-1015-ALL

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Samuel Ipina-Ipina pleaded guilty to being found in the

United States after previous deportation and was sentenced to 57

months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release. 

Ipina-Ipina argues that the felony and aggravated felony

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. 

Specifically, he argues that the viability of Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), is in doubt in light of

later Supreme Court cases. 
No. 05-41264

-2-

Ipina-Ipina contends that the waiver provision contained in

paragraph 2 of his plea agreement does not bar his ability to

raise this issue on appeal. The Government states that there was

no waiver of appellate rights in the plea agreement. The

Government’s position is consistent with this court’s

interpretation of this waiver provision. See United States v.

Reyes-Celestino, 443 F.3d 451, 452 (5th Cir. 2006). Further,

because the Government does not seek to enforce the waiver in

this case, it will not be considered. See United States v. Lang,

440 F.3d 212, 213 (5th Cir. 2006).

Ipina-Ipina’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres. Although Ipina-Ipina contends that

Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of

the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly

rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres

remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268,

276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Ipina-Ipina

properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of

Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to

preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21-0497

CHAPPELL HOLDINGS LLC,

Plaintiff and Counterclaim 

Defendant/Appellant,

vs.

FRANK BOONE and KELLY BOONE,

Defendants and Counterclaim 

Plaintiffs/Appellee. 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

ERIC A. MISNER and SHANA D. 

EAGLEFEATHERS,

Plaintiffs/Appellee,

vs.

FRANK R. BOONE, III, KELLY A. BOONE, 

and PURE REAL ESTATE, LLC,

Defendants/Appellee. 

 

FRANK R. BOONE, III and KELLY A. 

BOONE,

Counterclaim Plaintiffs/Appellee,

vs.

ERIC A. MISNER and SHANA D. 

EAGLEFEATHERS,

Counterclaim Defendants/Appellee. 

 

FRANK R. BOONE, III and KELLY A. 

BOONE,

Cross-claim Plaintiffs/Appellee, 

vs.

PURE REAL ESTATE, LLC,

Cross-claim Defendants/Appellee.

 

11/04/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0497
2

ERIC A. MISNER and SHANA D. 

EAGLEFEATHERS,

Cross-claim Plaintiffs/Appellee, 

vs.

CHAPPELL HOLDINGS LLC,

Cross-claim Defendant/Appellant.

A STIPULATION TO DISMISS having been filed in this matter, and for good cause 

appearing; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case and appeal is dismissed with prejudice, as fully 

and finally settled on the merits, with each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees. 

DATED this ____ day of November, 2021. 

____________________________________

Montana Supreme Court Justice

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 4 2021
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 854 

Honoring the individuals fighting and the individuals who have fallen 

responding to wildland fires during the ongoing 2022 wildfire season. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 29), 2022 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. LUMMIS, and Mr. SULLIVAN) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the individuals fighting and the individuals who 

have fallen responding to wildland fires during the ongoing 2022 wildfire season. 

Whereas more than 7,200,000 acres have burned in wildfire 

in 2022; 

Whereas changing climates, resulting in long-term trends of 

warmer and drier weather, and mismanagement of the 

forests of the United States are exacerbating the threat 

of wildfires and contributing to the greater than normal 

fire activity in western States, resulting in dangerous 

conditions for wildland firefighters; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 854 ATS 

Whereas the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic has exacerbated the public health and public safety risks inherent 

in combating wildfires; 

Whereas more than 20,000 personnel have been assigned to 

contain and combat the fires that threaten the West; 

Whereas Federal pay levels for wildland firefighters were established more than 30 years ago and should be re-evaluated based on the current wildfire risk and job market; 

Whereas the Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center program 

established by the Department of Labor and the Department of Agriculture trains the next generation of forestry 

technicians and wildland firefighters, providing dedicated 

personnel for conservation and firefighting activities; and 

Whereas wildland firefighters, first responders, sheriffs, and 

community leaders have acted bravely and risked their 

lives to contain dangerous wildfires across the United 

States to protect families and critical infrastructure: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the efforts and sacrifices of the 

3 wildland firefighters who have risked their lives to 

4 fight intense wildfires in 2022; 

5 (2) honors the bravery and heroism of the men 

6 and women assisting in responding to and combating 

7 wildfires; 

8 (3) expresses appreciation and gratitude to fire9 fighters for protecting lives and property in the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 854 ATS 

1 United States during the ongoing 2022 wildfire sea2 son; 

3 (4) expresses full support for communities 

4 throughout the West as those communities focus on 

5 recovery and rebuilding areas and communities af6 fected by wildfires; and 

7 (5) extends gratitude and appreciation to the 

8 families and loved ones of wildland firefighters for 

9 their important role in supporting the wildland fire10 fighter community. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 20250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10086]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 901 and 924


Alabama and Mississippi Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), 
Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSM is announcing the extension of the public comment period 
to May 10, 1995, pertaining to the implementation in Alabama and 
Mississippi of the underground coal mine subsidence control and water 
replacement provisions of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation 
Act of 1977 (SMCRA). OSM requested public comment on this issue on 
April 10, 1995 (60 FR 18044). The public comment period is being 
extended for the convenience of the public.

DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., C.S.T. on May 
10, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed or hand delivered to Jesse 
Jackson, Jr., Director, Birmingham Field Office at the address listed 
below.
    Copies of the applicable parts of the Alabama and Mississippi 
programs, SMCRA, the implementing Federal regulations, information 
provided by Alabama and Mississippi concerning their authority to 
implement State counterparts to SMCRA and the implementing Federal 
regulations, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all 
written comments received in response to this document will be 
available for public review at the address listed below during normal 
business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays.

Jesse Jackson, Jr., Director, Birmingham Field Office, Office of 
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite 
215, Birmingham, Alabama 35209, Telephone: (205) 290-7282.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jesse Jackson, Jr., Director, 
Birmingham Field Office, Telephone: (205) 290-7282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Comment Procedures

    Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues 
proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the 
commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated 
under DATES or at locations other than the Birmingham Field Office will 
not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included in 
the administrative record.

    Dated: April 17, 1995.
Richard J. Seibel,
Acting Assistant Director, Eastern Support Center.
[FR Doc. 95-10086 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott G. McNealy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/ Scott G. McNealyName:

Scott G. McNealyTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
Devonte BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-100

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6072
OZZIE B. HILL, Petitioner - Appellant, versusSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; NEWBERRY COUNTY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-1523-3-18BC) Submitted: April 21, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, HALL, Senior Circuit Judge Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ozzie B. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. South Carolina , No. CA-96-1523-3-18BC (D.S.C. Dec. 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-40051 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Gordon Eugene Grever, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:22-CR-967-1 

______________________________ 

Before Stewart, Elrod, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gordon Eugene 

Grever has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Grever has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

September 7, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-40051 Document: 00516886410 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2023
No. 23-40051 

2 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-40051 Document: 00516886410 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/07/2023
ស្ត

ីនិងឱសថបំបាត់

ការឈឺចាប

់

ស្តីជួបបទះការឈឺចាប់ខុសគ្នពីបុរស

• 

• 

• 

• 

FDA Office of Women’s Health

www.fda.gov/womens

បភទឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់

ឱសថគ្មនវជ្ជបញ្ជ(OTC)

ឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់គ្មនវជ្ជបញ្ជគឺមាននៅក្នុងផលិតផលទូទៅ

ជាចើនសមប់ពយាបាលឈឺកបាល ឈឺផ្តសាយនិងឈឺចាប់ពលមាន

រដូវ។ បភទឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់គ្មនវជ្ជបញ្ជជាទូទៅមាន ថ្នំអា

សតាមីណូហ្វន(acetaminophen) និង NSAIDs (ឱសថបឆាំងនឹង

ការលាកដលមិនមនជាស្តរ៉ូអ៊ីត) ដូចជាថ្នំអាសស្ពីរីននិងអ៊ីប៊ុយបូ

ហ្វនកមិតទាប(low-dose ibuprofen)។

ឱសថតាមវជ្ជបញ្ជ

• 

• 

ឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់អាចមានបសិទ្ធិភាពក្នុងការកាត់បន្ថយ

ការឈឺចាប់នៅពលតូវបានបើបស់តាមការណនំ។ 

ទោះជាយ៉ងណាក្តី ឱសថទាំងនះក៏អាចបង្កឲយមានរបួសធ្ងន់ធ្ងរ

ឬសាប់បាននៅព្ល លបើបស់មិនបានតឹមតូវឬបើបស់

ហួសកំណត់។ ពួកវាក៏អាចធ្វើឲយញៀនផងដរ។

ជាសំខាន់តូវនិយយជាមួយអ្នកផ្តល់សវាថទាំសុខភាពរបស់អ្នកអ្វីពី

របៀបបើបស់ឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់ឲយមានសុវត្ថិភាព។ 

ដូចគ្ននះដរ សូមសួរទៅអ្នកផ្តល់សវាថទាំសុខភាពរបស់អ្នកអំពី

ជមើសដទទៀតដើមបីពយាបាលការឈឺចាប់។ សូមបើបស់បញ្ជី

ហតុការណ៍នះដើមបីជួយអ្នកក្នុងការនិយយជាមួយអ្នកផ្តល់សវា

ថទាំសុខភាពរបស់អ្នកអំពីរបៀបបើបស់ឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់ឲយ

មានសុវត្ថិភាព។

វាមានអត្ថបយោជន៍និងហានិភ័យធ្ងន់ធ្ងរជាចើនសមប់ឱសថបំបាត់

ការឈឺចាប់ទាំងគ្មនវជ្ជបញ្ជនិងតាមវជ្ជបញ្ជ។
?

ស្តីនិងឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់

បញ្ជីហតុការណ៍នះតូវបានបង្កើតឡើងដោយការរិយល័យFDAសមប់សុខភាពស្តី

ដើមបីទទួលបានធនធានសុខភាពស្តីដទៗទៀត សូមចូលទៅកាន់គហទំព័រ:

www.fda.gov/womens

• 

• 

• 

• 

2021

ឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់អាចបង្កឲយមានរបួសធ្ងន់ធ្ងរឬសាប់បាន នៅពលដលគបើបស់វាមិនបាន

តឹមតូវឬលើសកមិត។ សូមចាត់វិធានការដើមបីការពារខ្លួនអ្នកផ្ទល់និងមនុសសជាទីសឡាញ់របស់អ្នក។

សូមពិភាកសាជាមួយអ្នកផ្តល់

សវាថទាំសុខភាពរបស់អ្នកអំពី

ការឈឺចាប់របស់អ្នក

សូមសួរមុននឹងអ្នក

ទទួលយកអូភីអ៊ីត 

សូមអនុវត្តតាមការណនំសមប់

ឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់របស់អ្នក

• 

• 

• 

• សូមទួរស័ព្ទទៅលខ 1-800-662-HELP (4357) ឬទសសន

គហទំព័រ https://findtreatment.samhsa.gov/ បសិនបើអ្នក 

ឬមនុសសជាទីសឡាញ់ណាមួយរបស់អ្នកតូវការជំនួយស្វងរក

ការពយាបាលសមប់ការញៀនដោយសារឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់ 

។

ស្តីនិងឱសថបំបាត់ការឈឺចាប់ (CAMBODIAN)
Jose Luis CASTILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10164.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>




                                                                      Exhibit 12


                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                              NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                             SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

Income before income taxes.................................      $      95
                                                                 ---------

FIXED CHARGES:

Interest on debt...........................................            111
Estimated interest portion of rents........................              2
                                                                 ---------
Total fixed charges........................................            113
                                                                 ---------
Adjusted income............................................            208

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1).....................          1.84x
                                                                 =========

(1)   The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing
      income before income taxes and fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed
      charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental expense as
      representative of interest portion of rentals.




                                       36