alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDRES RAMON FRANCISCOSALVADOR, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 12-70298 Agency No. A095-722-153
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted February 3, 2014 Pasadena, California Before: SCHROEDER and CLIFTON, Circ uit Judges, and TUNHEIM, District Judge. ** Andres Ramon Francisco-Salvador petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision finding Franc isco-Salvador removable. The BIA 

# FILED
AUG 28 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.rejected Francisco-Salvador’s argument that his due process rights were violated, finding that Francisco-Salvador had not demonstrated error and could not demonstrate any prejudice resulting from the alleged procedural errors in his removal proceedings. We have jurisd iction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo “[w]hether an immigration proceeding violates an alien’s due process rights,” Hamazaspyan v. Holder , 590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th Cir. 2009), and deny the petition. Francisco-Salvador’s claim that his statutory right to counsel under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(4)(A) was violated in the remova l proceedings fails because FranciscoSalvador “knowingly and voluntarily” waived that right when he appeared at the hearing without an attorney after th e immigration judge had continued the proceedings to allow him to obtain counsel. See Hernandez v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1014, 1020 (9th Cir. 2008). Francisco-Salvador’s other claims of pr ocedural error also fail to establish due process violations because he has not demonstrated prejudice. See MoralesIzquierdo v. Gonzales , 486 F.3d 484, 495 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc). FranciscoSalvador’s arguments regarding the immigr ation judge’s failure to inform him of the government’s burden of proof, sua spont e amendment of the notice to appear, and failure to apprise him of all possible avenues for relief, indicate only that the
2proceedings would have been different, but do not present a plausible scenario in which the outcome of those proceedings would have been different. See id. (“To show prejudice, [the petitioner] must pres ent ‘plausible scenarios in which the outcome of the proceedings would have been different’ if a more elaborate process were provided.” (quoting Walters v. Reno , 145 F.3d 1032, 1044 (9th Cir. 1998))). We also decline Francisco-Salvador’s request to remand to the BIA in light of Matter of Avetisyan , 25 I&N Dec. 688 (BIA 2012). Because Francisco-Salvador did not request administrative closure, Avetisyan is irrelevant to the outcome of his removal proceedings or BIA appeal. PETITION DENIED
.

3
Exhibit
13.1




Certification




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of China Digital TV Holding Co.,
Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Company’s
annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May
20, 2009




/s/
      Jianhua
      ZhuName:
                  Jianhua
      ZhuTitle:
                  Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Exhibit 32.1
   1.
    
    Dionex Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008,
and to which this Certification is attached (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.
 By:
    /s/ Lukas BraunschweilerName:
    Lukas BraunschweilerTitle:
    President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
    February 6, 2009
ex10-2.htm


    Exhibit
10.2

     

     

     

     

    
      EXERCISE
OF OPTION TO EXTEND AND

      AMENDMENT
NO. 1

      TO

      CHARTER
PARTY

      (THE
“CHARTERPARTY”)

      DATED
OCTOBER 6, 2005

      BETWEEN

      ANIA
AFRAMAX CORPORATION (THE “OWNERS”)

      AND

      DHT ANIA
AFRAMAX CORP. (THE “CHARTERERS”)

      FOR THE
VESSEL OVERSEAS ANIA

       

      Pursuant
to clause 99 of the Charterparty, the Charterers hereby declare, as of November
26, 2008, the exercise of the first 18 months of the option period which shall
commence on October 17, 2010 at 0001 hours GMT and end on April 16, 2012 at 2400
hours GMT (the “Option Period”).

       

      For that
portion of the Option Period commencing on October 17, 2010 at 0001 hours GMT
and ending on October 16, 2011 at 2400 hours GMT, the rate shall be usd 19,400 per day.

       

      For that
portion of the Option Period commencing on October 17, 2011 at 0001 hours GMT
and ending on April 16, 2012 at 2400 hours GMT, the rate shall be usd 19,700 per day.

       

      As of the
date of this agreement, the Owners and the Charterers hereby amend the terms of
the Charterparty as follows:

       

      (1)          Notwithstanding
clause 99, for the balance of the period subject to options, the Charterers are
hereby granted the option to select periods equal to: (a) 12 months, 24 months
or 36 months; or (b) on one occasion only, a single period equal to 6 months, 18
months, 30 months or 42 months.

       

      (2)          Except
as expressly amended by this agreement, including the declaration of the Option
Period by the Charterers and its acceptance by the Owners, the terms and
conditions of the Charterparty remain unchanged and in full force and effect
including, without limitation, the profit sharing arrangement between the Owners
and the Charterers.

       

      January
15, 2009

       

      
        
          
            	For
      Ania Aframax Corporation	 	 	For
      DHT Ania Aframax Corp.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                    By: 
      /s/ Ole Jacob Diesen

                  	 	 	
                    By: 
      /s/ Mats Berglund

                  	 
	
                    Name:  
      Ole Jacob Diesen

                  	 	 	
                    Name:  
      Mats Berglund

                  	 
	
                    Title:    
      Vice President

                  	 	 	
                    Title:    
      President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAFAEL SALAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPEAKER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00663-JST (RMI)

REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER

EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING

A settlement conference was held on May 22, 2019, and the results of that proceeding are 

indicated below:

(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the 

proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority:

( X ) Plaintiff, Rafael Salas, Pro Se

( ) Warden or warden’s representative

( X ) Office of the California Attorney General, Preeti Bajwa

( ) Other: 

(2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:

_____________________________________________________________________

(3) The outcome of the proceeding was:

( ) The case has been completely settled. The parties agree that a proposed stipulated 

order for dismissal of this case will be filed with the Court on ________________.

( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint 

stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet 

attached remain for this Court to resolve.
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

( X ) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time. Offer of settlement to 

remain open for 30 days from the May 22, 2019 Settlement Conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 6/3/2019

ROBERT M. ILLMAN

United States Magistrate Judge
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAFAEL SALAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPEAKER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00663-JST (RMI)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on June 3, 2019, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing 

said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery 

receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Rafael Salas ID: #:G-55918

Kern Valley State Prison

3000 W. Cecil Avenue

P.O. Box 5101, Fac.A, Bldg.5, Cell#127

Delano, CA 93216 

Dated: June 3, 2019

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

By:________________________

Gloria Knudson, Deputy Clerk to the 

Honorable ROBERT M. ILLMAN
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3645-3646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1091]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Ad Hoc Review Committee for the Recombinant DNA Advisory 
Committee; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is given of a meeting of the Ad Hoc Review Committee for the 
Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee on February 3, 1995, at the National 
Institutes of Health, Building 31, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892. The meeting will be held from approximately 9 a.m. to 
12 noon in Room 2C15, and continue in Room 5A16 from approximately 12 
noon to adjournment at approximately 5 p.m. The meeting will be open to 
the public to discuss three major topics for review: (1) Domain and 
mandate of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee; (2) composition of 
the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee; and (3) Recombinant DNA 
Advisory Committee's review of human gene transfer protocols. Members 
of the public wishing to speak at this meeting may be given such 
opportunity at the discretion of the Chair.
    Dr. Nelson A. Wivel, Director, Office of Recombinant DNA 
Activities, Suite 323, National Institutes of Health, 6006 Executive 
Boulevard, MSC 7052, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7052, Phone (301) 496-
9838, FAX (301) 496-9839, will provide materials to be discussed at 
this meeting, roster of committee members, and substantive program 
information. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Dr. Wivel in advance of the meeting. A 
summary of the meeting will be available at a later date.

    [[Page 3646]] Dated: January 11, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-1091 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRIMINAL MINUTES

Date: November 8, 2019 Time: 1:50 – 2:07 P.M.

Total Time: 17 Minutes

Judge: BETH LABSON FREEMAN

Case No.: 5:16-cr-00518-BLF-1 Case Name: UNITED STATES v. Damari William Singleton

Attorney for Plaintiff: Marissa Harris

Attorney for Defendant: Michael Hinkley for Damari William Singleton - P/C

Deputy Clerk: Tiffany Salinas-Harwell Court Reporter: Summer Fisher

Interpreter: N/A Probation Officer: N/A

PROCEEDINGS

RESTITUTION HEARING

Restitution Hearing held.

Parties Stipulate to Restitution as Stated on the Record. 

$50,100.00 to R.O.

$2,400.00 to L.G.

Affidavit to be filed.

///

P/NP: Present, Not Present 

C/NC: Custody, Not in Custody Courtroom Deputy 

I: Interpreter 

Original E-Filed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
registrant's  financial  statements  as of and for the six  month  period  ended
October 2, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements:
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                             567,991
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,265,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,000,537
<PP&E>                                           3,034,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,814,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,416,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,284,142
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        500,000
<COMMON>                                           397,813
<OTHER-SE>                                        (337,988)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,416,608
<SALES>                                          7,084,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,084,201
<CGS>                                            4,134,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,134,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,297,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (371,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (371,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (371,011)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.01)


</TABLE>
Veronica Olivia BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9857.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Peter John DIMITRION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3628

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 13, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     45,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,268
<PP&E>                                          40,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 383,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,067
<BONDS>                                          2,126
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     35,672
<COMMON>                                           789
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   383,963
<SALES>                                        226,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,053
<CGS>                                          160,901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  160,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,083)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,083)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.33)


</TABLE>
exv10wxjyxivy






Exhibit 10(j)(iv)




FIRST AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX G TO THE

NORTHROP GRUMMAN SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN 2 —

OFFICERS SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE

RETIREMENT PROGRAM

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005)




     This amendment to the January 1, 2005 restatement of Appendix G to the Northrop Grumman
Supplemental Plan 2 — Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (the “Appendix”)
addresses certain new participants under this Program.



     This amendment is effective December 1, 2008.




	1.	 	A new Section G.03(6) is hereby added to the Appendix to read as follows:
	 
	 	 	“Notwithstanding any other provision of this Program to the contrary, no additional
employees shall become eligible to participate in the Program after November 2008 unless the
Corporate Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Administrative Officer designates them
for participation in writing.”
	 
	2.	 	A new Section G.10 is hereby added to the Appendix to read as follows:
	 
	 	 	“2008 Participants.
	 
	 	 	Any employee who first became a Participant in the Program after June 2008 shall cease to
accrue benefits under the Program as of December 31, 2008. The present value of the accrued
benefit of such a Participant shall be distributed in a lump sum payment in 2009, pursuant
to transition rules under section 409A of the Code. The present value shall be calculated
using the actual assumption and calculation procedures for lump sum distributions under the
Northrop Grumman Pension Plan.”





*      *      *




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed by a duly authorized officer on this
19 day of Dec., 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Debora L. Catsavas
 	 
	 	 	Debora L. Catsavas 	 
	 	 	Vice President, Compensation, Benefits

and International
Case 3:05-mj-70262-MAG Document 42 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:05-mj-70262-MAG Document 42 Filed 06/27/05 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:05-mj-70262-MAG Document 42 Filed 06/27/05 Page 3 of 3
SPEAKER REQUEST FORM – NEW ERA OF SMARTER FOOD SAFETY 

Thank you for your interest in inviting an FDA Representative to participate in your event. To better assist us in 

processing your request, please provide as much information as possible in the form below and return it to 

SmarterFoodSafety@fda.hhs.gov. We will respond to you as quickly as possible upon receipt of the information below. 

EVENT DETAILS 

Name of event 

Host/organizer/sponsor 

Preferred date & time 

Location 

Purpose/theme 

Requested name of speaker (if any) 

Other FDA employees invited to speak at event 

Moderator of the event and/or individual 

introducing the FDA Speaker 

Event registration fee and/or fee range for 

attendees 

Attach/provide draft agenda (if available) 

FORMAT DETAILS 

Proposed role for speaker (e.g., keynote, session 

speaker, panelist, Q/A): 

Duration of session/remarks/Q/A 

1 
AUDIENCE 

Approximate number of attendees 

Audience profile (e.g., government, industry, 

growers, international, consumers) 

MEDIA 

Open or closed to media (If open to press, please 

provide a POC) 

Webcast 

Video recorded 

CONTENT DETAILS 

2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

COLLIER COUNTY, a political ) subdivision of the State of Florida, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-5805 ) PENNY PHILLIPPI, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed December 9, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; James R. Shenko, Judge.

Colleen M. Greene of Collier County Attorney's Office, Naples and Gregory N. Woods of Woods, Weidenmiller, Michetti & Rudnick, P.L., Naples, for Appellant.

Joseph D. Stewart of Joseph D. Stewart, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss Collier County's appeal of the circuit court's order granting

Penny Phillippi entitlement to recover her attorney's fees, bec ause the order reserved

jurisdiction to determine the amount. See McIlveen v. McIlveen , 644 So. 2d 612, 612

(Fla. 2d DCA 1994) ("[A]n order which only determines the right to attorney's fees- 2 - without setting the amount is a nonappealable, nonfinal order." ). We affirm on all other

issues raised in this appeal. See Collier Cty. v. Curry, 166 S o. 3d 967 (Fla. 2d DCA

2015); cf. City of Miami v. Bus Benches Co., 174 So. 2d 49, 52- 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)

("A municipality is bound to recogni ze its contracts, the same as an individual and one,

party to a contract with a municipality, is entitled to the con stitutional protection against

impairment of it if the municipality attempts to unilaterally c hange its obligations under a

valid agreement." (citations omitted)).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

WALLACE, CRENSHAW, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
--------------

From: Krause, Philip <Philip Krause@fda hhs gov> 

Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 7:40 AM 

To: Marks, Peter <Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov> 

Cc: Gruber, Marion <Marion.Gruber@fda.hhs.gov> 

Subject: Retirements 

Hi Peter, 

Marion mentioned over the weekend that she told you about her plans. I wanted to urgently provide 

you with information t hat I suspect will be useful for you going forward. I would have preferred to 

see you in person for this- but I also don't want to cause unnecessary delays as you make plans for 

the Office. 

I am in a very similar position t o Marion. (b) (6) 

(b) (6) the public health crisis and the opportunity to make a big difference 

(b) (

6) - and I am very proud to have been part of the amazing work that 

OVRR has done. However, we've now accomplished some of the more complex public health and 

regulatory goals and I am (b) (6) I have 

been planning to (b) (6) 

So I am writing to let you know formally that I will also retire as of (6J (6) 

(b) (

6) I know that t his wil l be a tough time for t he Office, and am ready to help with the 

transition in any way possible. 

I'm dealing with (b) (6) but would be happy to talk about the 

situation after that if you would like to. 

Best regards, 

Phil