alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Office of Global Policy and Strategy

Declaración de la OGPS

28 de marzo de 2023

Funcionarios de FDA se reúnen con SENASICA

La comisionada adjunta de Política, Legislación y Asuntos Internacionales de la FDA, 

Andi Fristedt, y otros funcionarios de la FDA se reunieron hoy con una delegación del 

Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA) de 

México, encabezada por el ingeniero Francisco Javier Calderón Elizalde, el nuevo 

director en jefe de la agencia, en la sede de la FDA en White Oak, Maryland. Los temas 

discutidos en la reunión incluyeron la nueva estructura del Programa Unificado de 

Alimentos para Humanos de la FDA; las prioridades de inocuidad alimentaria de la FDA 

y el SENASICA para el 2023; logros recientes y próximos pasos bajo la Alianza de 

Inocuidad Alimentaria (FSP, por sus siglas en inglés) con la Comisión Federal para la

Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios (COFEPRIS), otra agencia mexicana con

competencia en la inocuidad de los alimentos.

El FSP se estableció en 2020 para proteger la salud pública a través de la prevención 

de enfermedades transmitidas por los alimentos para consumo humano mediante el 

uso de enfoques modernos y prácticas preventivas basadas en evidencia técnica y 

científica, vigilancia de la salud y medidas de verificación. El FSP llevará a cabo una 

reunión virtual a finales de esta semana, el 31 de marzo, para discutir el progreso 

realizado en sus cuatro grupos de trabajo de contenido específico: prioridades 

estratégicas, colaboración de laboratorio, respuesta a brotes y capacitación en 

inocuidad alimentaria.

Otros funcionarios de la FDA que participaron hoy fueron: Donald Prater, director 

interino de la Oficina de Políticas y Respuesta Alimentaria; Michael Rogers, 

comisionado asistente de Operaciones de Alimentos para Animales y Humanos, 

Oficina de Asuntos Regulatorios; Julie Moss, directora de la Oficina de Relaciones 

Internacionales (OIE), Centro de Inocuidad Alimentaria y Nutrición Aplicada (CFSAN); 

Kristi Hampton, directora adjunta de la Oficina de Política y Estrategia Global (OGPS); 

y Steve Musser, director adjunto de Operaciones de Ciencias, CFSAN. La reunión
2

también contó con la participación virtual de Katherine Serrano, directora de la Oficina 

de América Latina (LAO), OGPS.

Acompañaron al director general Calderón, el maestro Leandro David Soriano García, 

director general de Inocuidad Agroalimentaria, Acuícola y Pesquera, SENASICA; Israel 

Cueto Espinosa, director de Regulación Fitosanitaria, SENASICA; Luis Enrique 

Martínez Senties, consejero de Asuntos Agrícolas, Embajada de México; y Brenda 

Esthela Martínez Vergara, especialista agrícola, Embajada de México.

###
Warren CURNUTT, petitioner, v. Jerry LESTER, Warden.

No. 12-8150.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Zhonterius Deontervan JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1160

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 23, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Lori A. Willner and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The appellant appeals the trial court's order imposing restitution in the amount of $3,228.52. We affirm the trial court's finding that it had jurisdiction without comment, but write only to address the appellant's challenge of the amount of restitution ordered.

The appellant claims the trial court's award was not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Given his arguments on this issue and the State's concession of error, we reverse the amount of restitution and remand for a new restitution hearing.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED .

Roberts, Makar, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Levory W. HICKMON, Appellant, v. RACHEL BUSHEY REESE, P.A., Appellee.

No. 1D19-0171

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 16, 2019

Levory W. Hickmon, pro se, Appellant.

Rachael E. Reese of O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

We treat Appellee's "notice of confession of error and request for remand" as Appellee's *842answer brief. However, we decline to accept the concession, and we affirm. *See**Perry v. State* , 808 So. 2d 268, 268 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (a confession of error is not binding upon an appellate court) (citations omitted); *see also**Markham v. N. Fla. Evaluation & Treatment Ctr.* , 248 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Appellant claims that the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing his civil complaint for monetary damages with prejudice because he was entitled to amend it pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(a). However, the record reflects that Appellant never presented this argument to the trial court below nor attempted to amend his complaint. Generally, "the rule of preservation applies to the improper dismissal of a complaint with prejudice." *Shelswell v. Bourdeau* , 239 So. 3d 707, 708 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (*citing**Vorbeck v. Betancourt* , 107 So. 3d 1142, 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) ). "For an issue to be preserved for appeal, it must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation." *Holland v. Cheney Bros.* , 22 So. 3d 648, 649-50 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). When there is no indication that an argument challenging a motion to dismiss was first presented to the trial court, the argument will be deemed waived on appeal. *See**Metro. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Tepper* , 969 So. 2d 403, 405 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), *approved* , 2 So. 3d 209 (Fla. 2009).

Because Appellant's claim is not preserved for appellate review, we decline Appellee's confession of error and affirm.

Ray, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.
Benjamin SERRANO, petitioner, v. Thomas DICKHAUT, Superintendent, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center.

No. 12-9783.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ALEXANDER LITZ, Appellant

v.

TECH GURU, LLC, Appellee

______________________

2021

- 2375

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in

No. 91214713.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R

Alexander Litz moves to voluntarily withdraw his appeal “without the imposition of cost or attorney fees.” Mot.

at 1. Tech Guru, LLC responds and “does not object to [Mr.]

Litz’s withdrawal of his appeal, but it disagrees with [Mr.] Litz’s request that such withdrawal occur without the imposition of costs or attorney fees” because it “continues to believe that [Mr.] Litz’s appeal is frivolous and that it has Case: 21-2375 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 09/15/2022LITZ v. TECH GURU

, LLC 2

been pursued for purposes of vexatiousness.” ECF No. 38

at 1.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

T he court has sua sponte determined that the award ofattorneys’ fees and costs is not appropriate. Mr. Litz’s motion is granted to the extent the appeal is dismissed with each party to bear its own costs.

September 15 , 2022

Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 15, 2022 Case: 21-2375 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 09/15/2022
UTERINE FIBROIDS: TIPS FOR YOUNG WOMEN

What are fibroids?

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign (not cancerous) tumors, 

or growths, in women of childbearing age. They grow in and around the 

muscular wall of the uterus (womb).
What are the symptoms of fibroids?

Symptoms can include changes in your period (heavy bleeding), fullness or pressure, 

pain (painful periods and during sex), and reproductive problems. Unless you have 

symptoms, you might not know you have fibroids. In some cases, a healthcare provider 

will find fibroids during a routine pelvic exam.

What causes fibroids?

No one knows for sure what causes fibroids. Researchers think more than one factor 

could play a role like age, family history and genetics, race/ethnic origin, weight, 

hormones, high blood pressure and dietary factors.

How are fibroids treated?

If you have symptoms, there are medical treatments to help. Talk with 

your healthcare provider about the best way to treat your fibroids. If 

you don’t have symptoms, you may not need treatment.

Learn more about uterine fibroids at www.fda.gov/uterinefibroids.

For more women’s health tips from the FDA Office of Women’s Health,

visit www.fda.gov/collegewomen.
Akamau JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3056

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2019

Akamau Johnson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*257The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Wetherell and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur; Makar, J., dissents with opinion.

Makar, J., dissenting.

The hearing officer in this case read the petitioner's factual allegations too narrowly in concluding that no factual issues exist and that the only issue presented is "strictly a matter of law." Rather, Petitioner says he was transferred from one institution to another, and was thereafter in lockdown for ten days, resulting in denial of access to his "legal work," which may include legal papers, correspondence, orders, and so on. The current record fails to establish when Petitioner received the order at issue he seeks to appeal; presumably some mail log exists to show when he received it. Because the trial court deemed the matter a purely legal issue, no factual findings were made on this important factual point. For these reasons, an amended *Staley* order is appropriate.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04-19-00438-CR & 04-19-00450-CR

EX PARTE Robert METZGER

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A1920

and

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7000

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s orders denying habeas 

corpus relief are AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED August 26, 2020.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE — C-05-01972 RMW 

MAG

E-FILED on 7/25/08

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ADESH TYAGI,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIKRAM LAMBA, BS LAMBA, and

SHIKHA SAWHNEY,

Defendants.

Case No. C-05-01972 RMW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On September 30, 2005, the court denied without prejudice plaintiff's motion for default

judgment as to defendants after finding that the damages sought were not sufficiently supported and that

default had been entered as to only two of the three defendants. Since the time the court issued that

order, there has been no further action in this matter. Nearly three years have elapsed since any

substantive action has taken place in this case, therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff file a written response by August 11, 2008 showing

cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to diligently prosecute. 

Case 5:05-cv-01972-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/25/08 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE — C-05-01972 RMW 

MAG

2

If plaintiffs fail to comply with this order or fail to show good reason for their failure to

diligently prosecute, the case will be dismissed.

DATED: 7/25/08

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01972-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/25/08 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE — C-05-01972 RMW 

MAG

3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff(s):

Ashwin Virji Ladva aladva@yahoo.com 

Counsel for Defendant(s):

No appearance

Each party's counsel is responsible for ensuring that co-counsel receives a copy of this order if cocounsel has not registered for e-filing pursuant to the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 7/25/08 /s/ MAG

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:05-cv-01972-RMW Document 12 Filed 07/25/08 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A

Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 3 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 4 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 5 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 1-1 Filed 12/19/16 Page 9 of 9
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 428 

Recognizing October 2021 as ‘‘National Principals Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2021 

Ms. SMITH (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KING, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. DURBIN, 

Mr. BRAUN, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing October 2021 as ‘‘National Principals Month’’. 

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals, the National Association of Elementary School 

Principals, and the American Federation of School Administrators have declared October 2021 to be ‘‘National 

Principals Month’’; 

Whereas principals are educational visionaries, instructional 

and assessment leaders, disciplinarians, community builders, budget analysts, facilities managers, and administrators of legal and contractual obligations; 

Whereas principals work collaboratively with teachers and 

parents to develop and implement clear missions, high 

curriculum standards, and performance goals; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 428 ATS 

Whereas principals create school environments that facilitate 

great teaching and learning and continuous school improvement; 

Whereas principals demonstrate leadership and play important roles in meeting the needs of students, families, and 

communities while responding to the Coronavirus Disease 

2019 (COVID–19) pandemic; 

Whereas the vision, actions, and dedication of principals provide the mobilizing force behind any school improvement 

effort; and 

Whereas the celebration of National Principals Month would 

honor elementary school, middle school, and high school 

principals and recognize the importance of principals in 

ensuring that every child has access to a high-quality 

education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes October 2021 as ‘‘National Prin3 cipals Month’’; 

4 (2) honors the contributions of principals in ele5 mentary schools, middle schools, and high schools in 

6 the United States; and 

7 (3) supports the goals and ideals of National 

8 Principals Month. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Paul F. Boling. Boling, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:
  (1)
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:             August 17, 2009
/s/Paul F. Boling
Name:  Paul F. Boling
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
 
  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11098]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Adivsory Panel for Economics, Decision and Management Sciences; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Economics, Decision and Management 
Sciences (#1759)
    Date and Time: May 22 and 23, 1995--8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 970, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Daniel H. Newlon, Program Director for 
Economics, Division of Social, Behavioral and Economic Research, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230. Telephone (703) 306-1753
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Human Capital Initiative 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11098 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
William COLEMAN, petitioner, v. William LEE, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

No. 12-9477.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
CONFIDENTIAL JUROR QUESTIONNAIRE – No. 17-cv-00600-LB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

CONFIDENTIAL

JUROR QUESTIONNAIRE

Please fill out this form as completely as possible and print clearly. Do not write on the back of 

any page. Instead, if you need more room, use the space at the end. Thank you.

1. Your name: 

2. City in which you reside: 

3. Your place of birth: 

4. Are you married or do you have a domestic partner? _____ Yes _____ No

5. Please list the occupation of your spouse or domestic partner.

6. If you have children, please list their ages and sex and, if they are employed, please give 

their occupations.

7. What is your occupation and how long have you worked in it? (If you are retired, please 

describe your main occupation when you were working.)

8. Who is (or was) your employer?

9. How long have you worked for this employer? 

10. Please describe your education background:

Highest grade completed: 

College and/or vocational schools you have attended:

Major areas of study: 

Case 3:17-cv-00600-LB Document 127 Filed 09/27/19 Page 1 of 2
CONFIDENTIAL JUROR QUESTIONNAIRE – No. 17-cv-00600-LB 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

11. Have you ever had jury experience? _____ Number of times? _____

If yes: State/County Court _____ Federal Court _____

When? _________________________ Was it a civil or criminal case? __________

Did any of the juries reach a verdict? _____ Yes _____ No

12. Have you, any relatives, close friends, or neighbors had any education, training, or work or 

volunteer experience in law enforcement? (“Law enforcement” includes any police or 

sheriff’s department, state police, highway patrol, jail or prison, military police, FBI, DEA, 

CIA, U.S. Marshal, prosecutor’s office, or any other law enforcement agency.)

_____ Yes _____ No

If you answered YES, please explain. 

13. Do you know anyone who has ever been employed by the County of Napa, including the 

Napa County Sheriff’s Office? _____ Yes _____ No

If you answered YES, please explain. 

14. Have you ever had any experience with, or do you have any connection with, any of the 

individuals or entities named below? (Check all that apply and please provide details after 

the name of the individual or entity.)

Parties Please Explain Connection

_____ Renee LePage

_____ Timothy Conrad Reid

_____ County of Napa

_____ Napa County Sheriff’s Department

Law Firms Please Explain Connection

_____ Munger, Tolles, & Olson LLP

_____ Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP

Case 3:17-cv-00600-LB Document 127 Filed 09/27/19 Page 2 of 2
Tonya CAPPALIA-EASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Bruce HENDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-1066

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          82,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  968,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    981,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,776,749
<PP&E>                                      14,067,825
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,612,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,248,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,189,889
<BONDS>                                         70,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,518,431
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,529,989)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,248,608
<SALES>                                      7,797,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,899,090
<CGS>                                        1,557,240
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,995,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,088,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             474,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,216,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (413,586)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (802,843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (802,843)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>