EXHIBIT C 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 1 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)

AGonzalez@mofo.com

ERIC A. TATE (CA SBN 178719)

ETate@mofo.com

RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426)

RudyKim@mofo.com

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, California 94105-2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

KAREN L. DUNN (Pro Hac Vice)

kdunn@bsfllp.com

HAMISH P.M. HUME (Pro Hac Vice)

hhume@bsfllp.com

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

1401 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington DC 20005

Telephone: 202.237.2727

Facsimile: 202.237.6131

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and OTTOMOTTO LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

DEFENDANTS UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED 

INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup

Trial Date: October 10, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 2 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1), Defendants Uber Technologies, 

Inc. (“Uber”) and Ottomotto LLC (“Ottomotto”) (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby amend and 

supplement its initial disclosures to Plaintiff Waymo LLC.

Defendants provide these disclosures subject to and without waiving any applicable 

privilege, doctrine, or right, including without limitation the attorney-client privilege, the joint 

defense/common interest privilege, the work product doctrine, and all other rights and privileges 

recognized under the laws of the United States, the State of California, and all relevant 

jurisdictions. By these disclosures, Defendants do not concede the relevance or admissibility of 

any particular information. Defendants make these disclosures based on information currently 

available to them. Defendants reserve the right to amend or supplement these disclosures and to 

present additional evidence to support their defenses with any filing or during any proceeding in 

this action, including trial, in accordance with the Court’s Case Management Order (Dkt. 562).

A. INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE INFORMATION

[Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(i)]

Defendants identify the following individuals who may have discoverable information 

that Defendants may use to support their defenses in this case. Waymo1should contact any 

current or former employee, agent, or other representative of Defendants only through 

Defendants’ counsel of record, unless otherwise specified. Additionally, individuals described as 

having knowledge of the “Stroz due diligence for the Uber/Ottomotto acquisition” are noted with 

an asterisk (*) because these individuals would be used to support Defendants’ defenses in this

case, or would testify about that subject, if and only if that subject is found not to be privileged.

 

1

“Waymo” refers to Waymo LLC (previously Project Chauffeur), Google Inc., and 

Alphabet Inc.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 3 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 2

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Travis Kalanick [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4 

San Francisco, CA 94103

Defendants’ business model 

and strategy for autonomous 

vehicles; Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

Uber’s decision to acquire 

Ottomotto; steps taken by 

Defendants to prevent trade 

secrets from prior employers 

coming to Defendants; 

Defendants’ autonomous 

vehicle program; 

March 11, 2016 meeting 

with Anthony Levandowski; 

knowledge of Waymo’s 

discussions with Defendants 

regarding a partnership with 

Defendants in the selfdriving vehicle/ride-sharing 

space; Defendants’ 

employment of Anthony 

Levandowski; Defendants’ 

termination of Anthony 

Levandowski

Jeff Holden [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4 

San Francisco, CA 94103

Defendants’ business model 

and strategy for autonomous 

vehicles; Defendants’ 

autonomous vehicle 

program; Uber’s decision to 

acquire Ottomotto; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 4 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 3

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Anthony 

Levandowski

Contact Mr. Levandowski’s counsel:

Ismail Ramsey or Miles Ehrlich

Ramsey & Ehrlich LLP 

803 Hearst Avenue

Berkeley, CA 94710

Nature of employment at 

Waymo and Defendants; 

design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR; 

Defendants’ autonomous 

vehicle program; 

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; the 

inventions disclosed and 

claimed in the ’922 and 

’464 patents, including 

conception and reduction to 

practice; the preparation and 

filing of the ’922 and 

’464 patents; business of 

Otto Trucking LLC; 

knowledge of Odin 

Wave LLC and Tyto 

LiDAR LLC; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information, 

including with respect to 

hardware; knowledge of the 

Project Chauffeur bonus 

program; March 11, 2016 

meeting with Anthony 

Levandowski; Stroz due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Radu Raduta Contact Mr. Raduta’s counsel:

Mary McNamara

Swanson & McNamara LLP

300 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100

San Francisco, CA 94104

Phone: (415) 477-3800

Fax: (415) 477-9010

Email: mary@smllp.law

Nature of employment at 

Waymo and Defendants;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 5 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 4

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Sameer Kshirsagar Contact Mr. Kshirsagar’s counsel:

Mark Punzalan

Punzalan Law, P.C.

600 Allerton Street, Suite 201

Redwood City, CA 94063

Phone: (650) 481-8112

Fax: (650) 362-4151

Email: markp@punzalanlaw.com

Nature of employment at 

Waymo and Defendants;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets

James Haslim [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

knowledge of Odin 

Wave LLC and Tyto 

LiDAR LLC; confirmation 

of the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Adam Kenvarg [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order; inspection 

pursuant to the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

William Treichler [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 6 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 5

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Florin Ignatescu [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Gaetan Pennecot [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR; 

Defendants’ 

non-misappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; the 

inventions disclosed and 

claimed in the ’922 and 

’464 patents, including 

conception and reduction to 

practice; the preparation and 

filing of the ’922 and 

’464 patents; nature of 

employment at Waymo; 

Waymo’s employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information, 

including with respect to 

hardware; knowledge of the 

Project Chauffeur bonus 

program; confirmation of the 

absence of evidence of trade 

secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 7 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 6

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Daniel Gruver [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR; 

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; the 

inventions disclosed and 

claimed in the ’922 and 

’464 patents, including 

conception and reduction to 

practice; the preparation and 

filing of the ’922 and 

’464 patents; nature of 

employment at Waymo; 

Waymo’s employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information,

including with respect to 

hardware; knowledge of the 

Project Chauffeur bonus 

program; confirmation of the 

absence of evidence of trade 

secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Scott Boehmke [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

Advanced Technologies Center

100 32nd St, Pittsburgh, PA 15201

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy 

order; confirmation of the 

absence of evidence of trade 

secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Jim Gasbarro [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

Advanced Technologies Center

100 32nd St, Pittsburgh, PA 15201

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 8 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 7

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Robert Doll [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

Advanced Technologies Center

100 32nd St, Pittsburgh, PA 15201

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Eric Meyhofer [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

Advanced Technologies Center

100 32nd St, Pittsburgh, PA 15201

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR; 

Defendants’ autonomous 

vehicle program; 

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

Defendants’ business model 

and strategy for autonomous 

vehicles; Uber’s decision to 

acquire Ottomotto; 

termination of Anthony 

Levandowski; confirmation 

of the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

John Bares [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

Advanced Technologies Center

100 32nd St, Pittsburgh, PA 15201

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR; 

Defendants’ autonomous 

vehicle program; 

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

Defendants’ business model 

and strategy for autonomous 

vehicles; Uber’s decision to 

acquire Ottomotto; steps 

taken by Defendants to 

prevent trade secrets from 

prior employers of 

Defendants’ employees 

coming to Defendants; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 9 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 8

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Asheem Linaval [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

Waymo’s policies as it 

relates to contractors 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Michael Karasoff [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

knowledge of Odin 

Wave LLC and Tyto 

LiDAR LLC; confirmation 

of the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Matthew Palomar [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Daniel Ratner [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 10 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 9

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Max Levandowski [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

George Lagui [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Design and development of 

Defendants’ LiDAR;

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 11 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 10

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Lior Ron [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Nature of employment at 

Waymo and Defendants;

Anthony Levandowski’s 

departure from Waymo; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski; knowledge of 

the Project Chauffeur bonus 

program; steps taken by 

Defendants to prevent trade 

secrets from prior employers 

of Defendants’ employees 

coming to Defendants; 

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets;

formation, purpose, and 

business of Otto 

Trucking LLC; formation, 

purpose, and business of 

Ottomotto; Ottomotto’s 

decision to be acquired by 

Uber; March 11, 2016 

meeting with Anthony 

Levandowski; Stroz due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Brent Schwarz [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets; 

knowledge of Odin Wave 

LLC and Tyto LiDAR LLC; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 12 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 11

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Cameron Poetzscher [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets;

business of Otto 

Trucking LLC; Uber’s 

decision to acquire 

Ottomotto; March 11, 2016 

meeting with Anthony 

Levandowski; Stroz due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Nina Qi [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets;

business of Otto 

Trucking LLC; Uber’s 

decision to acquire 

Ottomotto; March 11, 2016 

meeting with Anthony 

Levandowski; confirmation 

of the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Adam Bentley [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Formation, purpose, and 

business of Otto 

Trucking LLC; formation, 

purpose, and business of 

Ottomotto; Ottomotto’s 

decision to be acquired by 

Defendants and structure of 

the acquisition; knowledge 

of Odin Wave LLC and Tyto 

LiDAR LLC; submissions to 

the Nevada Department of 

Motor Vehicles; Stroz due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 13 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 12

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Ognen Stojanovski [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Knowledge of Odin 

Wave LLC, Tyto 

LiDAR LLC, and Sandstone 

Group LLC; confirmation of 

the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Rhian Morgan [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Hiring and onboarding 

process for Ottomotto, 

including hiring agreements; 

steps taken by Defendants to 

prevent trade secrets from 

prior employers of 

Defendants’ employees 

coming to Defendants; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 14 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 13

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Don Burnette [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Nature of employment at 

Waymo and Defendants; 

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets;

formation, purpose, and 

business of Ottomotto; 

Ottomotto’s decision to be 

acquired by Defendants; 

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

policies surrounding side 

projects and side businesses; 

knowledge of Waymo 

employee involvement in 

side projects and side 

businesses; knowledge of the 

Project Chauffeur bonus 

program; Stroz due diligence 

for the Uber/Ottomotto 

acquisition*; confirmation of 

the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Soren Juelsgaard* [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets;

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Colin Sebern* [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

Defendants’ nonmisappropriation of 

Waymo’s trade secrets;

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 15 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 14

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Brian McClendon [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski; knowledge of 

the Project Chauffeur bonus 

program; introduction of 

Anthony Levandowski to 

Defendants; confirmation of 

the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Justin Suhr [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

Uber’s decision to acquire 

Ottomotto and structure of 

the acquisition; confirmation 

of the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Angela Padilla [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Termination of Anthony 

Levandowski; Stroz due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 16 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 15

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Andrew Glickman [Contact through counsel of record]

Uber Technologies, Inc.

1455 Market Street, Floor 4

San Francisco, CA 94103

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

Uber’s decision to acquire 

Ottomotto and structure of 

the acquisition; confirmation 

of the absence of evidence of 

trade secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Eric Friedberg* Stroz Friedberg

32 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 4

New York, NY 10013

Phone: (212) 981-6540

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Mary Fulginiti* Stroz Friedberg

1925 Century Park, East Suite 1350

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Phone: (310) 623-3300

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Judith Branham* Stroz Friedberg

330 Second Avenue South, Suite 335 

Minneapolis, MN 55401

Phone: (612) 605-3000

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Melanie Maugeri* Stroz Friedberg

101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2200

San Francisco, CA 94104

Phone: (415) 671-4720

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Eric Amdursky* [Contact through O’Melveny and 

Myers LLP General Counsel]

Martin S. Checov

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Phone: (415) 984-8713

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Paul Sieben* [Contact through O’Melveny and 

Myers LLP General Counsel]

Martin S. Checov

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Phone: (415) 984-8713

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 17 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 16

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Eric Tate†2 Morrison & Foerster LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: (415) 268-7000

Stroz due diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

Rudy Kim† Morrison & Foerster LLP

755 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304

Phone: (650) 813-5600

Intellectual property due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*; 

inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy 

order

Shouvik Biswas*† Morrison & Foerster LLP

1650 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 400

McLean, VA 22102

Phone: (703) 760-7700

Intellectual property due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Wendy Ray† Morrison & Foerster LLP

707 Wilshire Boulevard

Los Angeles, CA 90017-3543

Phone: (213) 892-5200

Confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation; inspection 

pursuant to the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

Daniel Muino† Morrison & Foerster LLP

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Suite 6000

Washington, D.C. 20006

Phone: (202) 887-1500

Inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy 

order

Esther Kim Chang† Morrison & Foerster LLP

425 Market Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: (415) 268-7000

Inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy 

order

Sylvia Rivera† Morrison & Foerster LLP

707 Wilshire Boulevard

Los Angeles, CA 90017-3543

Phone: (213) 892-5200

Confirmation of the absence 

of evidence of trade secret 

misappropriation through 

and during compliance with 

the Court’s provisional 

remedy order

 

2

In view of the rapid pace of this litigation and the Court’s order requiring initial 

disclosures by June 21, 2017, Defendants are listing certain outside counsel as potential witnesses 

out of an abundance of caution. Such outside counsel are indicated with †. Defendants expect to 

resolve, through resolution of pending privilege issues and discussions with opposing counsel and 

the Court, whether any of these potential witnesses will in fact be called as witnesses at trial.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 18 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 17

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Kevin Faulkner Stroz Friedberg

32 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 4

New York, NY 10013

Phone: (212) 981-6540

Forensic examination of 

Uber-issued devices and 

data; confirmation of the 

absence of evidence of trade 

secret misappropriation 

through and during 

compliance with the Court’s 

provisional remedy order

John Krafcik Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

policies surrounding side 

projects and side businesses; 

knowledge of Waymo 

employee involvement in 

side projects and side 

businesses, including that of 

Anthony Levandowski; 

Waymo’s business plans; 

knowledge of discussions 

with Defendants regarding a 

partnership with Defendants 

in the self-driving 

vehicle/ride-sharing space; 

knowledge of the Project 

Chauffeur bonus program;

Pierre-Yves Droz Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Inventions disclosed and 

claimed in the ’922, ’464, 

and ’936 patents, including 

conception and reduction to 

practice; the preparation and 

filing of the ’922, ’464, and 

’936 patents; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information, 

including with respect to 

hardware; the design, 

development, and operation 

of Waymo’s LiDAR 

systems, self-driving car 

project, and purported trade 

secrets.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 19 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 18

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

William McCann Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Ben Ingram Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Bernard Fidric Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Luke Wachter Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Dmitri Dolgov Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 20 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 19

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Nathaniel Fairfield Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Andrew Chatham Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Rahim Pardhan Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Blaise Gassend Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 21 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 20

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Mark Shand Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Andrew Schultz Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Ryan Andrade Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Drew Ulrich Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Inventions disclosed and 

claimed in the ’922 and 

’464 patents, including 

conception and reduction to 

practice; the preparation and 

filing of the ’922 and

’464 patents; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; the 

design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 22 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 21

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Zachary Morris Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Inventions disclosed and 

claimed in the ’922 and 

’464 patents, including 

conception and reduction to 

practice; the preparation and 

filing of the ’922 and

’464 patents; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; the 

design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets

Samuel Lenius Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Invention disclosed and 

claimed in the ’936 patent, 

including conception and 

reduction to practice; the 

preparation and filing of the 

’936 patent; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; the 

design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets

Ionut Dorel Iordache Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems, self-driving 

car project, and purported 

trade secrets; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Daniel Chu Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Estimates and forecasts of 

ride-sharing market and 

Waymo’s share of ridesharing market; Waymo’s 

business and strategic plans 

(and plans generally) for the 

ride-sharing market, 

including projections for 

revenue generation and 

profitability

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 23 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 22

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Gerard Dwyer Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Estimates and forecasts of 

ride-sharing market and

Waymo’s share of ridesharing market; Waymo’s 

business and strategic plans 

(and plans generally) for the 

ride-sharing market, 

including projections for 

revenue generation and 

profitability

Jennifer Haroon Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Estimates and forecasts of 

ride-sharing market and 

Waymo’s share of ridesharing market; Waymo’s 

business and strategic plans 

(and plans generally) for the 

ride-sharing market, 

including projections for 

revenue generation and 

profitability

Joanne Chin Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Gary Brown Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s first awareness of 

alleged trade secret 

misappropriation; Waymo’s 

forensic investigation into 

alleged misappropriation of 

trade secret misappropriation

Michael Janosko Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s measures to 

protect the security of 

Waymo’s confidential 

documents, servers, and 

SVN repository; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 24 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 23

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Kristinn Gudjonsson Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s measures to 

protect the security of 

Waymo’s confidential 

documents, servers, and 

SVN repository; Waymo’s

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s forensic 

investigation into alleged 

misappropriation of trade 

secret misappropriation

Tim Willis Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s supply chain 

operations; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Sean Noyce Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s supply chain 

operations; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

Jai Krishnan Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s supply chain 

operations; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information

William Grossman Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s knowledge of 

Defendants’ LiDAR design; 

Waymo’s employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s receipt of 

correspondence containing 

Defendants’ LiDAR design

Ron Medford Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s filings, 

submissions, applications, or 

certifications made to public 

entities pertaining to its selfdriving cars and the use of 

lasers in autonomous 

vehicles

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 25 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 24

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Waymo Human 

Resources Manager

Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo employment and 

compensation issues; Project 

Chauffeur bonus program

Chelsea Bailey Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo employment and 

compensation issues; Project 

Chauffeur bonus program

Meiling Tan Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Marketing of Waymo’s 

autonomous vehicle 

program; Waymo’s business 

plans; Waymo’s strategy 

regarding its business model 

with respect to self-driving 

car technology; Waymo’s 

partnerships in the selfdriving car space; Waymo’s 

business and strategic plans 

(and plans generally) for the 

ride-sharing market, 

including projections for 

revenue generation and 

profitability

Individuals most 

knowledgeable about 

Waymo’s business, 

confidentiality 

policies, self-driving 

vehicle program, 

LiDAR systems, and 

employment and

compensation 

policies and 

practices

Waymo LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Waymo’s 

policies surrounding side 

projects and side businesses; 

knowledge of Waymo 

employee involvement in 

side projects and side 

businesses, including that of 

Anthony Levandowski; the 

design, development, and 

operation of Waymo’s 

LiDAR systems and 

purported trade secrets

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 26 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 25

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

David Krane Google Ventures

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

policies surrounding side 

projects and side businesses; 

knowledge of Waymo 

employee involvement in 

side projects and side 

businesses, including that of 

Anthony Levandowski; 

Waymo’s business plans; 

knowledge of discussions 

with Defendants regarding a 

partnership with Defendants 

in the self-driving 

vehicle/ride-sharing space

David Lu Google Ventures

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

policies surrounding side 

projects and side businesses; 

knowledge of Waymo 

employee involvement in 

side projects and side 

businesses, including that of 

Anthony Levandowski; 

Waymo’s business plans; 

Waymo’s strategy regarding 

its business model with 

respect to self-driving car 

technology; Waymo’s 

business and strategic plans 

(and plans generally) for the 

ride-sharing market, 

including projections for 

revenue generation and 

profitability; Waymo’s 

partnerships in the selfdriving car space; knowledge 

of discussions with 

Defendants regarding a 

partnership with Defendants 

in the self-driving 

vehicle/ride-sharing space

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 27 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 26

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Larry Page Alphabet Inc.

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

policies surrounding side 

projects and side businesses; 

knowledge of Waymo 

employee involvement in 

side projects and side 

businesses, including that of 

Anthony Levandowski; 

Waymo’s business plans; 

knowledge of discussions 

with Defendants regarding a 

partnership with Defendants 

in the self-driving 

vehicle/ride-sharing space; 

knowledge of the Project 

Chauffeur bonus program;

Sergey Brin Alphabet Inc.

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

policies surrounding side 

projects and side businesses; 

knowledge of Waymo 

employee involvement in 

side projects and side 

businesses, including that of 

Anthony Levandowski

Eric Schmidt Alphabet Inc.

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development of Waymo’s 

autonomous vehicle 

program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo

David Drummond Alphabet Inc.

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, CA 94043

Waymo’s knowledge of 

Defendants’ autonomous 

vehicle program; knowledge 

of Waymo’s discussions with 

Defendants regarding a 

partnership with Defendants 

in the self-driving 

vehicle/ride-sharing space.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 28 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 27

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Chris Urmson 1777 Latham Street

Mountain View, CA 94041

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski; knowledge of 

the Project Chauffeur bonus 

program;

Bryan Salesky Argo AI

40 24th Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 29 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 28

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Sebastian Thrun Udacity, Inc.

2465 Latham Street

Mountain View, CA 94040

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; knowledge of 

the Project Chauffeur bonus 

program; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Jiajun Zhu Nuro, Inc.

435 N Whisman Road, Suite 100

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Dave Ferguson Nuro, Inc.

435 N Whisman Road, Suite 100

Mountain View, CA 94043

Development and operation 

of Waymo’s autonomous 

vehicle program; Anthony 

Levandowski’s departure

from Waymo; Waymo’s 

employee policies 

concerning confidential and 

trade secret information; 

Waymo’s policies 

surrounding side projects and 

side businesses; knowledge 

of Waymo employee 

involvement in side projects 

and side businesses, 

including that of Anthony 

Levandowski

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 30 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 29

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Kyle Vogt Cruise Automation

201 11th Street

San Francisco, CA 94103

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of 

Velodyne 

LiDAR, Inc.

5521 Hellyer Avenue

San Jose, CA 95138 

(408) 465-2800

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of 

Quanergy 

Systems, Inc.

482 Mercury Drive

Sunnyvale, CA 94085

(408) 245-9500

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of Cepton

Technologies, Inc.

103 Bonaventura Drive

San Jose, CA 95134

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of Innoviz 

Technologies Ltd.

15 Atir Yeda Street

Kfar Saba, Israel 4464312

Email: info@innoviz.tech

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of 

Luminar 

Technologies, Inc.

495 Old Spanish Trail

Portola Valley, CA 94028

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of Toyota 

Motor Sales, U.S.A., 

Inc.

19001 South Western Avenue

Department WC11

Torrance, CA 90501 

(310) 468-5084

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of Ford 

Motor Company 

One American Road

Dearborn, MI 48126

(313) 322-3000

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of BMW 

of North America, 

LLC

300 Chestnut Ridge Road

Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677-7731

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of 

Leddartech USA Inc.

1209 N. Orange Street

Wilmington, DE 19801-1120

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of 

Phantom Intelligence 

Inc.

2740, Rue Einstein 

Québec, QC G1P 4S4 Canada

(418) 650-6518 

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of 

DENSO 

International 

America

24777 Denso Drive

Southfield, MI 48086 

(248) 350-7500

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of 

Continental 

Automotive, Inc.

18030 MacMillan Park Drive

Fort Mill, SC 29707 

(704) 583-8710

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 31 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 30

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Employee of 

Valeo Inc.

150 Stephenson Highway

Troy, MI 48083

(248) 619-8300

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of Suteng 

Innovation 

Technology Co., Ltd.

Robosense Building, Block 1

South of Zhongguan Honghualing 

Industrial District

No. 1213 Liuxian Avenue

Taoyuan Street, Nanshan District

Shenzhen, China

Phone: 400 6325830 / 0755-86325830

Email: Service@sz-sti.com

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets

Employee of 

Nalux Co., Ltd.

c/o Acme Agent, Inc.

41 S. High Street, Suite 2800

Columbus, OH 43215

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets; communications and 

business transactions with 

Waymo or Defendants 

regarding the manufacture of 

the FAC lens; manufacture, 

availability, and use of FAC 

lenses

Employee of 

OSRAM Opto 

Semiconductors Inc.

1150 Kifer Road, Suite 100

Sunnyvale, CA 94086

Public disclosure of 

Waymo’s purported trade 

secrets; communications and 

business transactions with 

Waymo or Defendants 

regarding the manufacture of 

the FAC lens; manufacture, 

availability, and use of FAC 

lenses; use and position of 

laser diodes on printed 

circuit boards

Employee of Gorilla 

Circuits

Gorilla Circuits

c/o CT Corporation

818 W. 7th Street, Suite 930

Los Angeles, CA 90017

Communications and 

business transactions with 

Waymo or Defendants 

regarding components for 

LiDAR sensors; 

manufacture, availability, 

and use of such components

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 32 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 31

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

Employee of 

Lyft, Inc.

185 Berry Street, Suite 500

San Francisco, CA 94107

Waymo’s business plans; 

Waymo’s strategy regarding 

its business model with 

respect to self-driving car 

technology; Waymo’s 

partnerships in the selfdriving car space; Waymo’s 

business and strategic plans 

(and plans generally) for the 

ride-sharing market, 

including projections for 

revenue generation and 

profitability

John Gardner c/o Rogers Joseph O’Donnell

311 California Street, 10th Floor

San Francisco, CA 

Representation of Anthony 

Levandowski; knowledge of 

Odin Wave LLC, Tyto 

LiDAR LLC, and Sandstone 

Group LLC; Stroz due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Alisa Baker Levine & Baker

340 Pine St Suite 300, 

San Francisco, CA 94104

Representation of Lior Ron; 

knowledge of Odin 

Wave LLC, Tyto 

LiDAR LLC, and Sandstone 

Group LLC; Stroz due 

diligence for the 

Uber/Ottomotto acquisition*

Jordan Jaffe† Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Phone: (415) 875-6600

Inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy 

order

Felipe Corredor† Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Phone: (415) 875-6600

Inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy 

order

Jeff Nardinelli† Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Phone: (415) 875-6600

Inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy 

order

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 33 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 32

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Persons Address Knowledge

John McCauley† Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Phone: (415) 875-6600

Inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy

order

Jared Newton† Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP

777 6th Street NW, 11th floor

Washington, D.C. 20001

Phone: (202) 538-8000

Inspection pursuant to the 

Court’s provisional remedy 

order

Defendants believe that Waymo’s current and former employees and consultants are likely 

to have knowledge of: (1) the design and development of Waymo’s LiDAR and purported trade 

secrets, including but not limited to failures to protect the confidentiality of such purported trade 

secrets; (2) the ’922, ’464, and ’936 patents (“the Asserted Patents”); (3) Waymo’s analyses or 

plans concerning the ride-sharing market, including projections for revenue generation and 

profitability; (4) Waymo’s delay in bringing this lawsuit and motivations for litigating against 

Defendants; (5) Waymo’s practice of allowing competing side businesses; and (6) lack of 

damages or irreparable harm to Waymo. The identities of all such individuals are known to 

Waymo but not to Defendants as of the date of this disclosure.3 Defendants reserve the right to 

supplement this list as additional facts are disclosed in discovery.

Further, Defendants identify the following persons who may have knowledge of facts 

relevant to this suit:

1. Any custodian of records or other person who may be required to establish 

authenticity of documents;

2. Any and all persons identified by Waymo in its initial disclosures; and

 

3 As set forth in Defendants’ motion to compel (Dkt. 687), Waymo has refused to respond to 

interrogatories or produce documents fundamental to Defendants’ defenses, which Uber needs to 

proceed with depositions. To date, Waymo has produced only 975 documents in response to 

Defendants’ first and second sets of requests for production, consisting of 162 document requests. 

If and when Waymo fulfills its interrogatory response and document production obligations, 

Defendants will supplement these disclosures based on information not currently known to 

Defendants.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 34 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 33

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Any and all persons whose depositions are taken, who provide written testimony in 

this action, or who contribute to any response to the parties’ discovery requests.

Additionally, Defendants have retained and intend to retain expert witnesses to testify on 

its defenses, including non-misappropriation of Waymo’s alleged trade secrets; the culture, 

customs, and practices in the autonomous vehicle space; non-infringement; invalidity; forensic 

investigations to locate the allegedly downloaded files; and lack of damages.

B. DOCUMENTS, ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION, AND

TANGIBLE THINGS [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Defendants identify the following categories of documents, electronically stored 

information, and tangible things in its possession, custody, or control that it may use to support its

defenses, unless solely for impeachment:

! Documents concerning Defendants’ autonomous vehicle program;

! Documents concerning Defendants’ design and development of LiDAR;

! Documents concerning Defendants’ efforts to commercialize autonomous vehicle 

technology;

! Drawings or photographs of Defendants’ LiDAR;

! Prototypes (or components of prototypes) of Defendants’ LiDAR;

! Documents concerning Defendants’ hiring process, including hiring agreements;

! Documents concerning Uber’s acquisition of Ottomotto;

! The Asserted Patents, their prosecution histories, and prior art to the Asserted Patents;

! Documents in the public domain relating to Waymo’s purported trade secrets;

! Documents concerning third-party suppliers of LiDAR components; and

! Waymo’s filings, submissions, applications, or certifications made to public entities 

pertaining to the use of lasers in autonomous vehicles.

To the extent the above-identified documents are within the possession, custody, or 

control of Defendants, such documents are generally located at Defendants’ offices at

1455 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103.

Defendants’ search for documents is ongoing, and Defendants reserve the right to 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 35 of 36
DEFENDANTS’ UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND OTTOMOTTO LLC’S AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 34

sf-3750758

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

supplement this disclosure under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e)(1). Defendants may also 

rely on documents produced by any party and third party to this litigation, including Defendants 

themselves and Waymo.

Defendants reserve the right to object to the production of any documents described herein 

on any basis permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

C. COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(iii)]

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C), Defendants may seek attorneys’ fees and costs in 

defending this action, but are unable at this time to estimate the amount.

D. INSURANCE AGREEMENTS [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(iv)]

Defendants are currently unaware of any insurance contracts applicable to any claim in 

this action.

CERTIFICATION

To the best of my knowledge, information and belief, formed after an inquiry that is 

reasonable under the circumstances, this disclosure is complete and correct as of the date set forth 

below.

Dated: June 21, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs

MICHAEL A. JACOBS

Attorneys for Defendants

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

and OTTOMOTTO LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1566-4 Filed 09/14/17 Page 36 of 36