Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 1995 / Notices 24621

tendered for filing a service agreement

with the City of Minnkota Power

Cooperative, Inc. providing for service

pursuant to Rainbow Energy Marketing

Corporation Rate Schedule No. 1.

Comment date: May 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Louisville Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–924–000]

Take notice that on April 18, 1995,

Louisville Gas and Electric Company

tendered for filing a copy of a service

agreement between Louisville Gas and

Electric Company and ENRON Power

Marketing, Inc. under Rate GSS.

Notice is also given that the service

agreement listed below and filed with

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission by Louisville Gas and

Electric Company is to be cancelled.

Date of agreement Purchaser Cancellation

date

Cancellation

effective

4/11/95 ............................................. ENRON Power Marketing, Inc .................................................................. 4/12/95 4/12/95

Comment date: May 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Louisville Gas and Electric

[Docket No. ER95–925–000]

Take notice that on April 18, 1995,

Louisville Gas and Electric Company

tendered for filing a copy of a service

agreement between Louisville Gas and

Electric Company and ENRON Power

Marketing, Inc. under Rate GSS.

Notice is also given that the service

agreement listed below and filed with

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission by Louisville Gas and

Electric Company is to be cancelled.

Date of agreement Purchaser Cancellation

date

Cancellation

effective

4/10/95 ............................................. ENRON Power Marketing Inc ................................................................... 4/11/95 4/11/95

Comment date: May 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11315 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–338–000, et al.]

Florida Gas Transmission Company, et

al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings

May 2, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission.

1. Florida Gas Transmission Co.

[Docket No. CP95–338–000]

Take notice that on April 21, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box

1188, Houston, Texas 77251–1188, filed

in Docket No. CP95–338–000 a request

pursuant to Sections 157.205 and

157.212 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for

authorization to upgrade an existing

meter station under FGT’s blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

553–000 pursuant to Section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

FGT proposes to upgrade the existing

Cane Island Meter Station (Cane Island)

by adding a single 12-inch turbine meter

run and related appurtenant facilities

for allowing delivery of up to 6,000

MMBtu per hour to Kissimmee Utility

Authority (Kissimmee). FGT states that

the end-use will be at two power plants

downstream of Cane Island. FGT will

deliver the proposed gas quantity on an

interruptible basis. FGT states that there

will be no incremental effect on its

pipeline system and there will be

sufficient capacity for continuing all

services without detriment or

disadvantage to other customers. Cane

Island is located in Township 25 South,

Range 27 East, Section 26, Osceola

County, Florida. Kissimmee will

reimburse FGT for all directly and

indirectly incurred construction costs.

The estimated cost will be between

$172,000 without inclusion of

expandability facilities or $220,000 with

inclusion of such facilities. The

expandability facilities would be

upstream and downstream measurement

headers with two 12-inch risers, blind

flanged for future installation of a

second 12-inch turbine meter. FGT is

not adding the second turbine meter at

this time, but will request if and when

Kissimmee applies for expansion.

Comment date: June 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

2. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.

[Docket No. CP95–368–000]

Take notice that on April 27, 1995,

Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG),

P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs,

Colorado 80944, filed in Docket No.

CP95–368–000 a request pursuant to

Section 157.205 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205) for authorization to

construct a new delivery facility to be

located in Lincoln County, Wyoming,

under CIG’s blanket certificate issued in

Docket No. CP83–21–000 pursuant to

Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as

more fully set forth in the request which

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

CIG states that the facility would

consist of a tap, approximately 200 feet

of 10-inch pipe and facilities

appurtenant thereto for the delivery and

receipt of gas to and from Overland
24622 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 1995 / Notices

Trail Transmission Company as

operator of the Overland Trail/Muddy

Creek Hub.

CIG states further that the capacity of

the proposed facilities is approximately

100 Mmcf per day and would cost

approximately $64,000 to construct.

Comment date: June 16, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

3. Great Lakes Gas Transmission

Limited Partnership

[Docket No. CP95–375–000]

Take notice that on April 28, 1995,

Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited

Partnership (Great Lakes), One

Woodward Avenue, Suite 1600, Detroit,

Michigan 48226, filed an application in

Docket No. CP95–375–000 pursuant to

7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for a

certificate of public convenience and

necessity authorizing it to construct and

operate a loop line of a portion of its

existing pipeline system, all as more

fully set forth in the application on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Great Lakes states that all but 4

percent (approximately 24.5 miles) of its

system is looped. In order to gain the

benefit of enhanced system reliability

and flexibility, Great Lakes has planned

to fill in the three unlooped segments of

its system. Great Lakes notes that this

objective would be implemented in

several separate stages. The subject

application, identified as the Security

Loop Project, is the first stage in this

process. Great Lakes requests authority

to construct and operate 13.8 miles of

36-inch loop beginning at the discharge

side of Great Lakes’ existing Boyne Falls

Compressor Station in Charlevoix

County, Michigan (milepost 722.8) and

extending to an interconnect with Great

Lakes’ existing mainline in Otsego

County, Michigan (milepost 736.6).

Great Lakes proposes to place the

facilities in service by November 1,

1996.

Great Lakes estimates that the

Security Loop Project will cost

$17,392,000. Although the project will

increase mainline capacity by 5,000 Mcf

per day, Great Lakes states that it has

not offered to provide any new firm

service because the purpose of the

project is to increase system reliability

and flexibility for Great Lakes’

customers and to facilitate system

maintenance. Great Lakes notes that the

project cost is equivalent to only about

1 percent of its total system cost and

will have an insignificant impact on

rates.

Comment date: May 23, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11316 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. RP95–263–000]

ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Proposed

Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 3, 1995.

Take notice that on May 1, 1995, ANR

Pipeline Company (ANR), tendered for

filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, its

Second Revised Volume No. 1, the

following tariff sheets, with an effective

date of June 1, 1995:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 8

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 9

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 13

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 16

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 18

ANR states that the above-referenced

tariff sheets are being filed to commence

recovery of approximately $4.5 million

of pricing differential (PD) costs that

have been incurred by ANR as a result

of the implementation of Order Nos.

636, et seq. ANR proposes a reservation

fee surcharge applicable to its Part 284

firm transportation customers to recover

ninety percent (90%) of the PD costs,

and an adjustment to the maximum base

tariff rates applicable to Rate Schedule

ITS and overrun service rendered

pursuant to Rate Schedule FTS–2, so as

to recover the remaining ten percent

(10%).

ANR states that all of its Volume No.

1 FERC Gas Tariff customers and

interested State Commissions have been

mailed a copy of this filing

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

NE., Washington, DC 20426, in

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such

motions or protests should be filed on

or before May 10, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11320 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M