alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chemist 

Description of Duties 

Reviews product chemistry in marketing applications received by the Center. Analyzes and 

determines the adequacy of data and tests submitted by a manufacturer regarding the 

composition of tobacco products and, as appropriate, their emissions. Provides scientific 

knowledge to develop and draft regulations and guidance documents. The chemist performs a 

key role in resolving issues that significantly affect scientific programs. Communicates 

scientific, technical, or complex concepts in writing as well as communicates findings, 

interpretations, and proposals orally. 

Qualifications 

 A bachelor’s degree or higher in physical sciences, life sciences, or engineering that 

included 30 semester hours in chemistry, supplemented by course work in mathematics 

through differential and integral calculus, and at least 6 semester hours of physics. While 

not required, a doctoral degree in chemistry is strongly preferred. A combination of 

education (coursework equivalent to a major) and experience may be considered. 

 U.S. citizenship is required. 

Education 

An official transcript, unofficial transcript, or a list including courses, grades earned, completion 

dates, and quarter and semester hours earned may be required. If you are using education 

completed in foreign colleges or universities to meet the qualification requirements, you must 

show that the education credentials have been evaluated by a private organization that specializes 

in interpretation of foreign education programs and such education has been deemed equivalent 

to that gained in an accredited U.S. education program; or full credit has been given for the 

courses at a U.S. accredited college or university. For further information, click on: foreign 

education.

Note: Please review each grade announcement for the specific qualifications and specialized 

experience. 

Grade (Salary) Level 

Federal General Schedule (GS) grade levels at which Chemists are commonly filled are: 
 GS-11 through GS-13 ($66,510.00 to $123,234.00 / Per Year) 

Geographic Location 

Chemists are located at FDA Headquarters in Silver Spring, MD
EXHIBIT 9 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 445-2 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT 10 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 445-2 Filed 05/16/17 Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT 11 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 445-2 Filed 05/16/17 Page 3 of 3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EXPERIAN –- CHICOINE V PHEAA, NO. 3:17-CV-00926 JST

Page 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark F. Anderson (SBN 44787)

ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER LLP

1736 Stockton Street, Ground Floor

San Francisco, California 94133

Telephone: (415) 651-1951

Fax: (415) 500-8300

Email: mark@aoblawyers.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Heather L Chicoine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HEATHER L. CHICOINE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION 

ASSISTANCE AGENCY, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:17-cv-00926 JST

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between counsel for plaintiff Heather L. 

Chicoine and counsel for defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) that 

plaintiff Heather L. Chicoine’s claims against Experian may shall be dismissed with prejudice, 

each party to bear its own fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 41(a)(2). 

Date: May 4, 2017 /s/ Mark F. Anderson

Mark F. Anderson, SBN 44787

Attorney for Plaintiff Heather L. Chicoine

Date: May 4, 2017 /s/ Kerry C. Fowler

Kerry C. Fowler

JONES DAY

555 South Flower Street, Fiftieth Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Phone: 213.489.3939

Fax: 213.243.2539

kcfowler@JonesDay.com

Case 3:17-cv-00926-JST Document 22 Filed 05/05/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EXPERIAN –- CHICOINE V PHEAA, NO. 3:17-CV-00926 JST

Page 2 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FILER ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), I, Mark Anderson attest under penalty of perjury 

under the laws of the United States that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from all of the signatories. 

Dated: May 4, 2017 /s/Mark F. Anderson

 Mark F. Anderson

Case 3:17-cv-00926-JST Document 22 Filed 05/05/17 Page 2 of 2
FDA Office of Women’s Health

Free Health Information for Women

www.fda.gov/womenshealthpubs

If you want 

to know more 

about topics 

such as...

Caregiving

Birth control

Diabetes

Women in clinical studies

Women and pain 

medicines

Mammograms

Medications and 

pregnancy

Menopause

Osteoporosis

Women’s heart health

Food safety

HIV

www.fda.gov/womenshealthpubs

Please visit:
La Oficina de Salud de la Mujer de la FDA

Información de salud gratis para las mujeres

www.fda.gov/womenshealthpubs

Si quiere saber 

más sobre 

temas como...

Consejos sobre los 

medicamentos y los 

dispositivos cuando 

cuida de otros 

Control de la natalidad

Diabetes

Las mujeres en los

estudios clínicos

Las mujeres y los 

analgésicos

Mamografías

Medicamentos y el 

embarazo

Menopausia

Osteoporosis

Salud del corazón de la 

mujer

Seguridad en los 

alimentos

VIH

www.fda.gov/womenshealthpubs

Por favor visite:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER REQUIRING

RESPONSES RE MOTION FOR

PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION

The Court has reviewed non-party Anthony Levandowski’s motion for permissive

intervention (Dkt. No. 151). Both sides in this matter shall please respond to the motion by

5:00 P.M. TODAY.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 153 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 1
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount (the “Contract”) Entered into by and between Mr. Li Xiangqian
and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank (the “Creditor”) on December
3rd, 2008

      


      Main
contents:

      Ø 
Guaranty Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Ebaozi
20081203001-3;

      Ø  As guarantor, Mr. Li Xiangqian undertakes to
assume joint and several liabilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the
“Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards Shenzhen Development Bank under the
Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference
no.: Shenfa Longgang Zongzi 20081203001) from December 8th, 2008
to December 8th, 2009,
and the maximum amount secured is RMB150 million.

      Ø  Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the Obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the Obligor or the
guarantor).

      Ø  Scope of Guaranty: The guaranty
shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach
of contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses
such as litigation cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice
cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s
right.

      Ø  Guaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

      


      Headlines
of the articles omitted:

      Ø  Termination and explanation

      Ø  Payment on demand

      Ø  Declaration and guaranty

      Ø  Independent guaranty

      Ø  Fulfillment of the responsibility and giving
up of the right

      Ø  Amendment of the Contract

      Ø  Effectiveness and Disputation
settlement

      Ø  Contract period

      Ø  Supplement articles
Kevin Arnold VASQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

THOMAS LEGG, JR., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-cv-844-JTM-CAN

)

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING )

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW )

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; )

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS )

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY )

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; )

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant, Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC (“Alaunus”), by counsel, moves to dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, as to Alaunus, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

12(b)(6). As fully set forth in Alaunus’s accompanying brief, simultaneously filed herewith, 

Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to set forth a viable claim for relief and must be dismissed. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, LLC respectfully requests that 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, as to Alaunus, dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 

case 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN document 16 filed 02/06/13 page 1 of 2
2

LEWIS WAGNER LLP

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

DINA M. COX, #18590-49

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49

Attorneys for Defendant Alaunus Pharmaceutical, 

LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 6, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney

STUTSMAN & MULVANEY

1300 Cassopolis Street

P.O. Box 1337

Elkhart, Indiana 46515

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200

Indianapolis, IN 46202

Phone: (317) 237-0500

FAX: (317) 630-2790

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\15 - Legg\Federal Court Action\Alaunus MTD.docx

case 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN document 16 filed 02/06/13 page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 108 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 108

  Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the designation of the Gila 
                              Wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2024

 Mr. Vasquez submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the designation of the Gila 
                              Wilderness.

Whereas, on 3 June, 1924, the Forest Service set aside 755,000 acres as the Gila 
        Wilderness;
Whereas this was the first designated wilderness in the United States of America 
        and the world;
Whereas this designation marked the beginning of a national system of wilderness 
        areas and helped inspire the Wilderness Act of 1964;
Whereas Aldo Leopold, a Forest Service employee in New Mexico, worked to 
        initiate a Federal wilderness concept in the back country of the Gila 
        National Forest;
Whereas Arthur Carhart, a Forest Service employee, argued that wilderness 
        recreation would help to develop individual and national character;
Whereas the Apache and Mimbres people have been stewards of this land from time 
        immemorial; and
Whereas these 100 years later, the character of the Gila remains without 
        permanent human-built structures, protected and managed to preserve this 
        condition, and remains a place unrestrained by human development: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That we commemorate the 100th anniversary of the designation of the 
Gila Wilderness.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 24672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11534]



      


                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 1995 / Sunshine 
Act Meetings
[[Page 24672]] 




BOARD FOR INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING

DATE AND TIME: May 12, 1995, at 1:15 p.m.

PLACE: American Council of Life Insurance, 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
N.W., 5th Floor, The Executive Board Room, Washington, D.C. 20004.

OPEN MEETING: The members of the Board for International Broadcasting 
(BIB) will meet in open session from 1:15 P.M. to about 2:45 P.M. to 
discuss the following matters: 1) approval of the minutes of the most 
recent BIB open meeting; 2) the Chairman's report; 3) RFE/RL, Inc., 
President's report; 4) reports by other RFE/RL, Inc., executives or BIB 
staff members, as necessary, concerning the move to Prague or other 
current topics; 5) new business; and 6) set the date of the next 
meeting.

CLOSED MEETING: The open session of the BIB meeting will be followed by 
a closed meeting of the Board of Directors of RFE/RL, Inc., a nonprofit 
private corporation.

CONTRACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Patricia Sowick, Program Officer, 
Board for International Broadcasting, Suite 400, 1201 Connecticut 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. (Tel: 202-254-8040).

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Richard W. McBride,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 95-11534 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6155-01-M
1 of 4ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAN 11, 2017 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT2 of 43 of 44 of 4
### Oce of Minority Health and Health Equity 

# 퍇뫛햃폃킰샃뱇

탘샣
풯쇔
픻샯샴핓웇ힿ폋몇켗

픛ힻ폧샴뿣쫌픿뫻잧퀓햃킰샃샟



## 짳탘핓퍸뭨쾇퀓짷홬쫯멯 쨊쫯멯심쭻켗 셏쟉픻혐쫯읷펶밫퓿켗삏

www.fda.gov/healthequity

healthequity@fda.hhs.gov

1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332)
@FDAHealthEquity 짳탘핓퍸뭨픻핿캼탗폋 쇀옟샃샟 핿캼탗폋헼샟뫛컘맼숓졯 샯샴핓웇ힿ뫷캼핓탨탗퐟 XXXDMJOJDBMUSJBMTHPW 폋켗 쐋ힻ폨핓핿캼탗폋샻폧 

# 혗샴뿣쫌픿퍎픷졫캯팿맻밫

## 혗샴뿣쫌핯앻줯폂햀샃뱇
핳킋잫픿햓쟇싟ힻ 좶멫뺓햓캧풤ힻ 좶썇쨗컘샃샟 쟇싟펯ힻ삏 읯좧픷왗
샴
맻켳왗 풯쨓숓펯폋뼃ힻ왗 캧풤숓솿왘쇐킰샃샟 퍜폋뺣팿	뾍픻샴
켳폋풯쨓숓ힻ좶샃샟 탗맿핯ힻ뺣폋쌫앷홫혃숓ힻ퍅삏샴뿣쫌픻탧햠쫌
 탛햠쫌
믳잧뫛탗옠캼탟뫷먔픻샟읳탧맼줳혗읷 픛ힻ옟뫛뽳옠퍷삏쪏퓿
믳잧뫛펷쟃뺓햋훷

몫혐샃샟

숓펯 햃킰샃샟ힻ쾈헼샴
켷켗읷뼞펯좂쭿쟃샟

혗샴뿣쫌픿퍎뫛햃삏펯쎟캧얇싟픻멯먐탘샣
햃킰샃샟 샴뫻잧핓탧픻 폼펌캧뺓샴뿣뭋픜햋퐻캼핓폧멯먐탘샣픿 쟇싗탨탗퐟

좳핯핳킋잫픿뫷헼픷왗캧풤솿왘솿풫졫 샴픿셏햓홫혃솿왘휈샃샟탧햠쫌뫷탛몸 •

•



### ힿ샣

혐캼 짳쟇 샴뿣쫌헿샣몿 폋켗

샴뿣쫌 핯캼 샴컄쾇삏ힻ뺗먗퓏맿핓믛샴픿 캧얇싟폋몇삏짳쟇핓몫뫷맻 핯캼헼햀샃샟샴컄쾇맻셏뾍픿몸풫샴뿣
핷뼿폋헼펯솿멻캧폧샴컄쾇 줳혗맻햃픿몸풫셏햋훷멻캧탨탗퐟 혗샴뿣쫌픿퍎뫛햃삏쟉픻캧얇싟픻샴뿣쫌퍸픿 쫰풤풏맻햃픿퀓햃킰샃샟핯멾싟폋삏퍇퍸
 핳킋잫
픻샟읳훷캧싟핯숛퀓햃킰샃샟

햃킰샃샟



### Managing your blood sugar Eating healthy Being physically active Managing your blood pressure Not smoking •

•

•

•

• 

# 샴뿣쫌뫷탛햠멯먐

Having diabetes raises your risk of kidney disease (nephropathy). Keep your kidneys healthy by:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60108

UNITOG RENTAL SERVICES, INC.,

Respondent,

versus

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

(16-CA-14380)

December 9, 1996 Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

The cross-application of the National Labor Rela tions Board

for enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board

is GRANTED, and Unitog Rental Services, Inc.’s petition for review

of the order of the National Labor Relations Board is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21524-21525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10827]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee for Energy-Related Epidemiologic Research: 
Cancellation of Meeting

    This notice announces the cancellation of a previously announced 
meeting.

    Federal Notice Citation of Previous Announcement: 60 FR 19264, 
April 17, 1995.
    Previously Announced Times and Dates: 
9 a.m.-5 p.m., May 4, 1995, 9 a.m.-12 noon, May 5, 1995.
    Change In the Meeting: This meeting has been 
canceled. [[Page 21525]] 
    Contact Person for More Information: Nadine Dickerson, Program 
Analyst, Radiation Studies Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards 
and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, 
Mailstop F-35, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 404/488-7040.

    Dated: April 26, 1995.
John C. Burckhardt,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 95-10827 Filed 4-28-95; 10:33 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
#### In re: Marvin L. KOTLER, Petitioner.

No. 04-6589.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 5, 2004.

Decided: May 21, 2004.

Marvin L. Kotler, Petitioner pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*931PER CURIAM:

Marvin L. Kotler petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to compel the production of information and his motion for expungement of criminal restitution. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Oui' review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied both of these motions on March 12, 2004. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
Travis Hunter BLANK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9136.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Manuel VELEZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 12-7716.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
#### Garegin MOURADIAN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70222.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 27, 2004.

Inna Lipkin, Law Office of Inna Lipkin, Redwood City, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Christopher C. Fuller, Mary Jane Candaux, Esq., John D. Williams, Esq., Jennifer L. Lightbody, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*502Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Garegin Mouradian, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of deportation, relief under the Convention Against Torture, and voluntary departure. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary denial of voluntary departure. *See Antonio-Cruz v. INS,*147 F.3d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1998). We also lack jurisdiction over Mouradian’s contention that the IJ erred in excluding a letter from the administrative record, because Mouradian did not exhaust before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358*F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

Because the transitional rules apply, *see Kalaw v. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997), we have jurisdiction over the remainder of this petition for review under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review for substantial evidence adverse credibility determinations, *Wang v. INS,*352 F.3d 1250, 1253 (9th Cir.2003), as well as determinations that a petitioner is ineligible for relief under the Convention Against Torture, *Zheng v. Ashcroft,*332 F.3d 1186, 1193 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, because the inconsistencies identified in Mouradian’s testimony go to the heart of his asylum claim. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 992-93 (9th Cir.2003). Because Mouradian failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily fails to qualify for withholding of deportation. *See id.*at 993.

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s separate determination that Mouradian is ineligible for relief under the Convention Against Torture, because this claim is based on statements the IJ properly concluded were not credible, and Mouradian failed to identify other evidence that should have been considered. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2003).

Mouradian’s remaining contentions lack merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Daryl J. ROGERS, petitioner, v. James M. LeBLANC, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, et al.

No. 12-9378.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Gina SWIFT, petitioner, v. EAST BATON ROUGE JUVENILE COURT, et al.

No. 12-8784.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W. Mobley,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Paul W. Mobley
                                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                                   Date: May 11, 2009