alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
INCLUDED IN PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   38,383  
<SECURITIES>                                                  0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                             6,863  
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0  
<INVENTORY>                                                   0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         57,364  
<PP&E>                                                   12,237  
<DEPRECIATION>                                            8,076  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           70,174  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    19,178  
<BONDS>                                                       0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0  
<PREFERRED>                                                   0  
<COMMON>                                                  3,402  
<OTHER-SE>                                               47,581  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             70,174  
<SALES>                                                  56,947  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         56,947  
<CGS>                                                    34,058  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            46,301  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          12,418
<INCOME-TAX>                                                190   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      12,228   
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0  
<CHANGES>                                                     0  
<NET-INCOME>                                             12,228   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              3.01   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              2.98   
                                           



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 582

Non-party Anthony Levandowski has filed an Administrative Motion to File under Seal

Portions of his Letter Brief Moving to Quash Waymo’s Subpoena to Stroz Friedberg, LLC (Dkt. 

No. 583.) Levandowski seeks to seal the portion of this document “because he understands from

the parties’ prior filings that Defendants have designated that information confidential.” (Dkt. No 

582 at 2.1)

Under Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1), Uber was therefore required within “4 days of the filing 

of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal . . . [to file] a declaration as required by 

subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material is sealable.” However, 

Uber did not file a declaration in support of sealing; it had until June 15th to do so. The Court has 

also reviewed the portion itself and finds that it is not sealable. Accordingly, the administrative 

motion to file under seal is DENIED. Levandowski shall file a public version of his brief consistent 

with this Order by no later than July 4, 2017. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(3).

 

1 Record citations are to material in the Electronic Case File (“ECF”); pinpoint citations are to the 

ECF-generated page numbers at the top of the documents. 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 742 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

This Order disposes of Docket No. 582. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2017 

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 742 Filed 06/27/17 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 93 (Monday, May 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25937-25938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11894]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Meeting of the Aviation Security Advisory Committee

DATES: The meeting will be held June 6, 1995, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

[[Page 25938]] ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the MacCracken 
Room, tenth floor, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591, telephone 202-267-7451.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Security Advisory Committee 
to be held June 6, 1995, in the MacCracken Room, tenth floor, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. 
The agenda for the meeting will include reports on the Universal Access 
prototype test, Implementation Plan for Explosive Detection Systems, 
ACS Plan for implementation of Internet with industry and our 
counterparts in government, Review of cargo measures, and the revision 
of FAR Parts 107/108.
    Attendance at the June 6, 1995, meeting is open to the public but 
is limited to space available. Members of the public may address the 
committee only with the written permission of the chair, which should 
be arranged in advance. The chair may entertain public comment if, in 
its judgment, doing so will not disrupt the orderly progress of the 
meeting and will not be unfair to any other person. Members of the 
public are welcome to present written material to the committee at any 
time. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information 
should contact the Office of the Associate Administrator for Civil 
Aviation Security, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone 202-267-7451.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 9, 1995.
Bruce Butterworth,
Director of Civil Aviation Security Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 95-11894 Filed 5-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

DIANA ROHRER, Individually and 

DIANA ROHRER and DAWN 

CUBBERNUSS as co-Administrators of 

The ESTATE OF DANIEL RICHARD 

ROHRER, Deceased, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY INC. aka NEW ENGLAND 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN

JUDGE: JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendant Ameridose, LLC (“Defendant”), by counsel, hereby 

moves this Court for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and 

including March 25, 2013. Defendant’s Answer is currently due February 25, 2013. Plaintiff’s 

counsel has been consulted and has no objection to the requested extension 

WHEREFORE, Defendant, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendant up to and 

including March 25, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises. 

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 24 filed 02/22/13 page 1 of 2
2 

013260.000021/1630527.1 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Knight S. Anderson 

Knight S. Anderson (17216-53) 

Tucker Ellis LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Tel: 216.592.5000 

Fax: 216.592.5009 

E-mail: knight.anderson@tuckerellis.com 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 22, 2013 using the ECF system that sent notification of this filing to all ECFregistered counsel of record via e-mail generated by the Court’s ECF system. 

 /s/Knight S. Anderson 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 24 filed 02/22/13 page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of NRDC Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 200 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
A. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      April 4, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Juan LARA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9679.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

            DESCRIPTION OF THE ANNUAL RETAINER FOR SERVICE DURING THE
                    FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AS A
          MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
           OR OF A BANK SUBSIDIARY OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION OR AS
       A MEMBER OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR A DIVISION OF A BANK SUBSIDIARY

         The boards of directors of Park National Corporation ("Park") and each
of its banking subsidiaries, as well as the members of each advisory board for a
division of a bank subsidiary, determined that each of the non-employee
directors or non-employee advisory board members, as appropriate, was to receive
the annual retainer for service as a board member during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003, in the form of Park common shares. Each director of Park who
was not an employee of Park or one of its subsidiaries received an annual
retainer for service as a member of the Park board of directors in the form of
120 Park common shares. Each non-employee director of one of Park's bank
subsidiaries received an annual retainer for service as a member of that
subsidiary's board of directors in the form of 60 Park common shares. Each
non-employee member of an advisory board for a division of a bank subsidiary
received an annual retainer for service as a member of that advisory board in
the form of 60 Park common shares. These common shares were issued on November
5, 2003.
William Thomas SCHMITZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-9257.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 
AS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,426
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     76,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,153
<PP&E>                                          37,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,755
<BONDS>                                        106,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,600
<COMMON>                                           799
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,244
<SALES>                                         96,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,456
<CGS>                                           67,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,028)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,028)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
Nathan L. HILL, petitioner, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden.

No. 12-9212.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Order entered September 20, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 00673 - CV BRIAN REAUX, Appellant

V. GEORGE ABDOU, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1 - 16 - 0989



### O RDER Befor e the Court is appellant’s September 18, 2017 motion for extension of time to file brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received by the Court September 8, 2017 filed as of t he date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned officers of Vinyl Products, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to their knowledge:





1. the annual report on Form 10-K of
Vinyl Products, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Vinyl Products,
Inc.





Date:
      April 9, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Gordon KnottName:
              Gordon
      KnottTitle:
              Chief
      Executive Officer Principal Executive
  Officer





Date:
      April 9, 2010
              By:
              /s/Douglas E. WellsName:
              Douglas
      E. WellsTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer Principal Financial
  Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 10, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11438]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-270-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 4, 1995.
    Take notice on May 2, 1995, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation 
(Texas Gas), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with a 
proposed effective date of May 4, 1995:

First Revised Sheet No. 197
First Revised Sheet No. 198
First Revised Sheet No. 200
First Revised Sheet No. 201

    Texas Gas states that the referenced tariff sheets have been 
revised to reflect changes to Sections 25.4 and 25.5 of its General 
Terms and Conditions regarding capacity releases as enacted by the 
Commission by Final Rule in Docket No. RM95-5-000 (Order No. 577).
    Texas Gas states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being 
mailed to Texas Gas's affected customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before May 11, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11438 Filed 5-9-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 13.2







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Cell Kinetics Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen N. Crea, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:
      June 30, 2009
                        /s/ Stephen
      N. CreaName:
      Stephen N. CreaTitle:
      Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial
    officer)
<PAGE>

CHARTWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.



September 20, 2000


Mr. James R. Stock
Stock Enterprises
2492 Rye Beach Lane, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV  89012


RE:  EXTENSION OF CONTRACT BETWEEN
     STOCK ENTERPRISES AND CHARTWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.


Dear Jim:

This letter confirms our understanding that you have agreed to extend the
contract dated October 11, 1999 between Chartwell International, Inc. and Stock
Enterprises, Inc. from October 11, 2000 through October 11, 2001.

Subject to approval by Chartwell's Board of Directors, Chartwell International,
Inc. agrees to extend your option to purchase the Chartwell warrants to January
3, 2003. In addition, Chartwell agrees to accept a one year promissory note from
you for the exercise of the warrants.

We look forward to working with you.


Sincerely,

/s/ Janice A. Jones

Dr. Janice A. Jones
Chair of the Board

JAJ/cs


Agreed, Approved & Understood:


/s/ James R. Stock
------------------------------------------
James R. Stock for Stock Enterprises, Inc.



           333 S. ALLISON PARKWAY, SUITE 100, LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80226
                      TEL: 303-804-0100 O FAX: 303-224-0156
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

FORT WAYNE DIVISION

DEBBY MOORE, as personal representative of )

the estate of RICHARD STRICLER, deceased, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:12-CV-379

)

TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF FORT WAYNE, )

LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

OPINION AND ORDER

This case was removed to this Court from the Allen Superior Court by Defendant based

on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 2.) The Notice of Removal

alleges that “Defendant Texas Roadhouse of Fort Wayne, LLC is organized under the laws of the

Commonwealth of Kentucky. Its principal place of business is in Louisville, Kentucky. On

information and belief, Plaintiff Debby Moore . . . is a citizen of the State of Indiana.” (Notice

of Removal ¶ 4.) 

Defendant’s Notice of Removal, however, is inadequate for two reasons. First, as to

Defendant Texas Roadhouse of Fort Wayne, LLC, a limited liability company’s citizenship “for

purposes of . . . diversity jurisdiction is the citizenship of its members.” Cosgrove v. Bartolotta,

150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998). Therefore, merely alleging that Texas Roadhouse of Fort

Wayne, LLC is organized under the laws of Kentucky and has its principal place of business in

Kentucky is insufficient. Rather, the Court must be advised of the citizenship of all the members

of Texas Roadhouse of Fort Wayne, LLC to ensure that none of its members share a common

1
citizenship with Plaintiff. Hicklin Eng’g, L.C. v. Bartell, 439 F.3d 346, 347 (7th Cir. 2006). 

Moreover, citizenship must be “traced through multiple levels” for those members of Texas

Roadhouse of Fort Wayne, LLC who are a partnership or a limited liability company, as

anything less can result in a dismissal or remand for want of jurisdiction. Mut. Assignment &

Indem. Co. v. Lind-Waldock & Co., LLC, 364 F.3d 858, 861 (7th Cir. 2004).

Moreover, as to Plaintiff Debby Moore, “[a]llegations of federal subject matter

jurisdiction may not be made on the basis of information and belief, only personal knowledge.”

Yount v. Shashek, No. 06-753-GPM, 2006 WL 4017975, at *10 n.1 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 2006)

(citing Am.’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992));

Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114, at *1 (N.D.

Ill. Oct. 28, 2004); Hayes v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, No. 02 C 9106, 2003 WL 187411, at

*2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2003); Multi-M Int’l, Inc. v. Paige Med. Supply Co., 142 F.R.D. 150, 152

(N.D. Ill. 1992). Consequently, Defendant must amend its Notice of Removal to properly allege

the citizenship of Plaintiff Debby Moore on personal knowledge rather than on information and

belief.

Therefore, Defendant is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended

Notice of Removal on or before November 13, 2012, properly alleging the citizenship of

Defendant Texas Roadhouse of Fort Wayne, LLC and Plaintiff Debby Moore.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for this 30th day of October, 2012.

/S/ Roger B. Cosbey 

Roger B. Cosbey,

United States Magistrate Judge

2