alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Grace v Apple

Item 6b ‐ FaceTime Information

SDDF003_Grace_Phone01

Prepared By: RB Barnes

Date Prepared: 05/09/2018

# Country code Network code Network Name Direction Parties Date Time Duration Call Type Video call Source Deleted Tag No1 000 00 Incoming 3/11/2012 3/11/2012 11:31:35 AM(UTC-7) 00:00:05 Incoming Yes FaceTime 2 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 

3 Incoming 00:00:00 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 3(1) Incoming 00:00:00 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 4 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 5 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 5(1) Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 6 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing FaceTime Yes 7 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing FaceTime Yes 8 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 9 Incoming 00:00:08 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 10 Outgoing 00:00:41 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 11 Incoming 00:00:55 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 12 Outgoing 00:01:51 Outgoing FaceTime Yes 13 Outgoing 00:01:27 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 14 Outgoing 00:01:34 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 15 Outgoing 00:00:46 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 16 Incoming 00:00:12 Incoming FaceTime Yes 17 Incoming 00:01:15 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 18 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing FaceTime Yes 18(1) Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing FaceTime Yes 19 Incoming 00:00:00 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 233-3 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 2
19(1) Incoming 00:00:00 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 

20 Outgoing FAMILY MEMBER 00:00:39 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 21 Outgoing 00:00:50 Outgoing FaceTime Yes 22 Incoming 00:01:52 Incoming FaceTime Yes 23 Incoming 00:01:57 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 24 Outgoing 00:01:57 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 25 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 25(1) Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 25(2) Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 26 Incoming FAMILY MEMBER 00:00:00 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 27 Incoming 00:01:41 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 28 Incoming 00:00:00 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 28(1) Incoming 00:00:00 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 28(2) Incoming 00:00:00 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 29 Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 29(1) Outgoing 00:00:00 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 30 Incoming 00:01:09 Incoming Yes FaceTime Yes 31 415 Unknown network (Lebanon) Outgoing 00:00:13 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 32 769 Outgoing 00:00:19 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 33 002 Outgoing 00:00:13 Outgoing Yes FaceTime Yes 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 233-3 Filed 07/19/18 Page 2 of 2
Erica HOFFMAN, et al., petitioners, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY.

No. 12-889.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 106

 Expressing support for local law enforcement officers and condemning 
           efforts to defund local law enforcement agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2024

  Mr. Ezell (for himself and Mr. Rutherford) submitted the following 
   concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for local law enforcement officers and condemning 
           efforts to defund local law enforcement agencies.

Whereas the brave men and women in local law enforcement work tirelessly to 
        protect the communities they serve;
Whereas local law enforcement officers are tasked with upholding the rule of law 
        and ensuring public safety;
Whereas local law enforcement officers selflessly put themselves in harm's way 
        to fight crime, get drugs off the streets, and protect the innocent;
Whereas defunding police narratives vilify and demonize local law enforcement 
        officers and put them at greater risk of danger;
Whereas local law enforcement officers take an oath to never betray the public 
        trust;
Whereas the local law enforcement community protects our streets, acknowledges 
        the rights of all Americans, and keeps citizens safe from harm;
Whereas local law enforcement officers are recognized for their public service 
        to all, knowing they face extremely dangerous situations while carrying 
        out their duties;
Whereas a healthy and collaborative relationship between local law enforcement 
        officers and the communities they serve is essential to creating 
        mutually respectful dialogue; and
Whereas local law enforcement officers deserve respect and profound gratitude: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes and appreciates the dedication and devotion 
        demonstrated by the men and women of local law enforcement who 
        keep the Nation's communities safe;
            (2) extends its gratitude to all local law enforcement 
        officers and their families for their sacrifice and service; 
        and
            (3) condemns calls to defund, disband, dismantle, or 
        abolish the police.
                                 <all>
```
United Bancorp Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K - 01/16/09



EXHIBIT 10.2


UST Sequence Number 448




WAIVER




In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer's participation in the United States Department of the Treasury's TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008.


I acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called "golden parachute" agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program.


This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship.






	
January 16, 2009
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Mobley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                  /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Paul W. Mobley
                                  Chief Financial Officer of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                  Date: November 14, 2005
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000051
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000052
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000053
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000054
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000055
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000056
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000057
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000058
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000059
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000060
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000061
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000062
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000063
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000064
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000065
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000066
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000067
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000068
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000069
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000070
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000071
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000072
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000073
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000074
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000075
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000076
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000077
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000078
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000079
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000080
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000081
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000082
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000083
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000084
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000085
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000086
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000087
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000088
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000089
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000090
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000091
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000092
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000093
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000094
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000095
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000096
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000097
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000098
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000099
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000100
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000101
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000102
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000103
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000104
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000105
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000106
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000107
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000108
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000109
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000110
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000111
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000112
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000113
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000114
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000115
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000116
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000117
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000118
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000119
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000120
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000121
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000122
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000123
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000124
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000125
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000126
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000127
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000128
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000129
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000130
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000131
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000132
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000133
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000134
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000135
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000136
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000137
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000138
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000139
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000140
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000141
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000142
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000143
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000144
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000145
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000146
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000147
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000148
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000149
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000150
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000151
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000152
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000153
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000154
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000155
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000156
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000157
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000158
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000159
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000160
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000161
OC-MAY23-POSTING-000162
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification

I, Tian Ling, certify that:

        1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Iron
Star Development, Inc.;

        2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this  report;

        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this  report;

        4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
small business issuer and have:

        a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

        b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

        c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

        5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

        a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

        b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 21, 2006            /s/ Tian Ling
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Tian Ling, Chief Executive Officer
Byron Zaid RAHMANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3086

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,728,451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,728,451
<PP&E>                                      22,395,185
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,983,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,139,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          561,464
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,578,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,139,954
<SALES>                                     10,241,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,294,970
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  718,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,576,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,576,225
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66


</TABLE>
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD:

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application.

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Reset Form 5:16-md-02752-LHK

IN RE: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA 

BREACH SECURITY LITIGATION Dorothy P. Antullis Florida

Plaintiffs Schwartz, Corso, Howard, Essar, 

Collier, Cote, Ciangiulli, Morris, and Stras Shawn A. Williams

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 

120 E. Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500 

Boca Raton, FL 33432 561/750-3000

dantullis@rgrdlaw.com

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 

One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 415/288-4544 shawnw@rgrdlaw.com 04/19/2017 s/Dorothy P. Antullis Dorothy P. Antullis 890421 May 4, 2017

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 86 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 823 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 823

     To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. 
                              Groseclose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 11, 2022

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. 
                              Groseclose.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Groseclose, Cr. No. 21-311, pending in 
        the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate, and from Nate Russell and Diego Torres, custodians of records in 
        the Senate Recording Studio, a department of the Office of the Sergeant 
        at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, and Nate Russell and Diego Torres, 
custodians of records in the Senate Recording Studio, are authorized to 
provide relevant testimony in the case of United States v. Groseclose, 
except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Messrs. Schwager, Russell, and Torres, and any current or former 
officer or employee of their offices, in connection with the production 
of evidence authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```