1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS PATENTS / COUNTERCLAIMS 3:17-cv-00795-JST 

Gordon & Rees LLP

101 W. Broadway Suite 2000

San Diego, CA 92101

ROBERT P. ANDRIS (SBN 130290)

randris@grsm.com 

MICHAEL D. KANACH (SBN 271215) 

mkanach@grsm.com 

GORDON & REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: 415.986.5900 

Facsimile: 415.986.8054 

KEVIN W. ALEXANDER (SBN 175204) 

kalexander@grsm.com 

GORDON & REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 

101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 

San Diego, CA 92101 

Telephone: (619) 696-6700 

Facsimile: (619) 696-7124 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

SPARTACUS 20TH L.P.; 

SPARTACUS 20TH G.P., INC.; 

PHILIP R. PALUMBO; 

JAKOB IRION; 

BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P.; 

BODYROK FRANCHISE G.P., INC.; 

EXERCISE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.; 

BODYROK MARINA, L.P.; 

SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC; 

SPARTACUS LOMBARD, L.P. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LAGREE 

FITNESS, INC., MAXIMUM FITNESS 

INCORPORATED, and SEBASTIEN LAGREE, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

SPARTACUS 20TH LP., SPARTACUS 20TH 

G.P., INC., PHILIP R. PALUMBO, JAKOB 

IRION, BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P., 

BODYROK FRANCHISE G.P., INC., EXERCISE 

TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., BODYROK MARINA, 

L.P., SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC and 

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00795-JST

PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 

TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT 

TO FILE A SUR-REPLY TO 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFFS’ PATENT 

INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS AND 

RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 

PURSUANT TO FED.R. CIV. 41(a)(2) 

AND 12(b)(1);

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Courtroom: 9 

Judge: Jon S. Tigar 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS PATENTS / COUNTERCLAIMS 3:17-cv-00795-JST 

Gordon & Rees LLP

101 W. Broadway Suite 2000

San Diego, CA 92101

SPARTACUS 20TH LP., SPARTACUS 20TH 

G.P., INC., PHILIP R. PALUMBO, JAKOB 

IRION, BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P., 

BODYROK FRANCHISE G.P., INC., EXERCISE 

TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., BODYROK MARINA, 

L.P., SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC, and 

SPARTACUS LOMBARD, L.P. 

Counter-Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LAGREE 

FITNESS, INC., MAXIMUM FITNESS 

INCORPORATED, and SEBASTIEN LAGREE, 

and SPX FITNESS, INC., and ROES 1 through 10, 

inclusive, 

Counter-Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS PATENTS / COUNTERCLAIMS 3:17-cv-00795-JST 

Gordon & Rees LLP

101 W. Broadway Suite 2000

San Diego, CA 92101

TO THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT: 

Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b) of the Civil Local Rules (L.R.), Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., LAGREE FITNESS, INC., MAXIMUM 

FITNESS INCORPORATED, SEBASTIEN LAGREE, and SPX FITNESS, INC. (“Plaintiffs”), 

and Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs SPARTACUS 20TH L.P., SPARTACUS 20TH G.P., 

INC., PHILIP P. PALUMBO, JAKOB IRION, BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P., BODYROK 

FRANCHISE G.P., INC., EXERCISE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P., BODYROK MARINA, L.P., 

SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC, and SPARTACUS LOMBARD, L.P. (“Defendants”) 

(hereinafter collectively the “Parties”), stipulate as follows: 

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a motion for administrative relief pursuant to 

Local Rule 7-11, requesting leave to file a sur-reply in response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiffs’ Patent Infringement Claims and Related Counterclaims Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(2) and 12(b)(1) (Dkt. No. 79) (“Motion to Dismiss”) and Plaintiffs’ Reply (Dkt No. 104) 

which contained a declaration and Exhibit, namely a covenant not to sue signed on September 8, 

2017 (Dkt No. 104-1). 

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have met and conferred in an attempt to reach an 

agreement on the terms of a potential stipulated dismissal. 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to continue meeting and conferring regarding the terms of a 

potential stipulated dismissal. 

WHEREAS, on September 8, 2017, the Court continued the hearing on the Motion to 

Dismiss to November 2, 2017 (Dkt. No. 103). 

WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the Parties met and conferred and stipulated to a 

one-week extension of time for Defendants to file their motion for administrative relief for leave 

to file a sur-reply, up to and including September 22, 2107, which would give the Parties 

sufficient time to discuss mutually-agreeable terms to a stipulated dismissal. 

WHEREAS, the Parties have stipulated to three previous time modifications for Plaintiffs 

to file their reply to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 85, 96 and 99). 

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs were also granted one additional modification for Plaintiffs to file 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS PATENTS / COUNTERCLAIMS 3:17-cv-00795-JST 

Gordon & Rees LLP

101 W. Broadway Suite 2000

San Diego, CA 92101

their reply to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 94). 

WHEREAS, the Parties have stipulated to four previous time modifications in connection 

with responses to the Parties’ respective pleadings on April 11, 2017 (Dkt. No. 35) and May 18, 

2017 (Dkt. No. 51), June 14, 2017 (Dkt. No. 68), and July 20, 2017 (Dkt. 82). 

WHEREAS, this stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 

fixed by the Court order, and could resolve one of the issues before the Court’s November 2, 

2017 hearing. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby 

stipulate and agree that Defendants’ motion for administrative relief to file a sur-reply to the 

Motion to Dismiss shall be filed no later than September 22, 2017. 

DATED: September 15, 2017 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP

By: /s/ Robert P. Andris

Robert P. Andris 

Michael D. Kanach 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

SPARTACUS 20TH LP. ; 

SPARTACUS 20TH G.P., INC.; 

PHILIP R. PALUMBO; 

JAKOB IRION; 

BODYROK FRANCHISE, L.P.; 

BODYROK FRANCHISE G.P., INC.; 

EXERCISE TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.; 

BODYROK MARINA, L.P.; 

SCULPT FITNESS BERKELEY, LLC; 

SPARTACUS LOMBARD, L.P. 

DATED: September 15, 2017 NEUSTEL LAW OFFICES, LTD

By: /s/ Chad E. Ziegler

Chad E. Ziegler (Pro Hac Vice) 

Edward K. Runyan (Pro Hac Vice) 

Michelle G. Breit 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

LAGREE FITNESS, INC.; 

MAXIMUM FITNESS INCORPORATED; 

SEBASTIEN LAGREE; 

SPX FITNESS, INC. 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- 

PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 

FILE SUR-REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS PATENTS / COUNTERCLAIMS 3:17-cv-00795-JST 

Gordon & Rees LLP

101 W. Broadway Suite 2000

San Diego, CA 92101

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

September 20, 2017