alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11015]



[[Page 22022]]

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-52, RM-8604]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Roann, IN

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Roann Broadcasting seeking the allotment of FM 
Channel 270A to Roann, Indiana, as that community's first local aural 
transmission service. Coordinates used for Channel 270A at Roann are 
40-55-18 North Latitude and 85-55-30 West Longitude. Roann is located 
within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the Canadian border, and 
therefore, the Commission must obtain concurrence of that Government in 
this proposal.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 22, 1995, and reply 
comments on or before July 7, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, 
D.C. 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested 
parties should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Matthew H. 
McCormick, Esq., Reddy, Begley, Martin & McCormick, 1001 - 22nd Street, 
NW, Suite 350, Washington, D.C. 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 95-52, adopted April 19, 
1995, and released May 1, 1995. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 
140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-11015 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-11291

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff–Appellee, 

v. 

BRIAN TERRY, also known as B. T., 

Defendant–Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:09-CR-293-4 

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Brian Terry, federal prisoner # 42458-177, appeals the district court’s 

denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction of his sentence based 

on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered 

the base offense levels in the drug quantity table set forth in U.S.S.G. 

§ 2D1.1(c). We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision whether 

to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Henderson, 636 F.3d 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-11291 Document: 00513798745 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2016
No. 15-11291

2 

713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). “A district court abuses its discretion if it bases its 

decision on an error of law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.” 

Id. (quoting United States v. Smith, 417 F.3d 483, 486-87 (5th Cir. 2005)). 

At his original sentencing, Terry’s offense level was calculated based on

the career-offender guideline in § 4B1.1 and not the drug amounts in 

§ 2D1.1(c). Accordingly, his sentence was not based on a guideline that has 

been amended, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding 

that he is not eligible for a sentence reduction. See United States v. Banks, 770 

F.3d 346, 349 (5th Cir. 2014). He cannot use a § 3582(c)(2) motion to challenge 

the application of the career-offender guideline provision at his original 

sentencing based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 

135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). See United States v. Hernandez, 645 F.3d 709, 712 (5th 

Cir. 2011) (“A modification proceeding is not the forum for a collateral attack 

on a sentence long since imposed . . . .”). 

 AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 15-11291 Document: 00513798745 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2016
Vincent RIVERA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NOS.: 2D19-1896 2D19-1890

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               RULE 13A-14(B) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Textron Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas J. Cullen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                               Textron Financial Corporation

                                               /s/ Thomas J. Cullen
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Thomas J. Cullen
                                               Executive Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 9, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25238-25239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11597]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

John E. Fogarty International Center for Advanced Study in the 
Health Sciences; Meeting of the Fogarty International Center Advisory 
Board

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the thirtieth 
meeting of the Fogarty International Center (FIC) Advisory Board, May 
23, 1995, in the Lawton Chiles International House (Building 16), at 
the National Institutes of Health.
    The meeting will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. to noon. In 
addition to a report by the Director, FIC, and a report on the Science 
Leadership Exchange that was recently sponsored by the White House 
Office of Science and Technology Policy, the agenda will focus on new 
and emerging infectious diseases which result from ecological changes 
and population patterns. In addition to naturally evolving disease 
pathogens, the agenda also will address manufactured pathogens and 
research issues related to biological weapons.
    In accordance with the provisions of Secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
meeting will be closed to the public from 1:15 p.m. to adjournment for 
the review of applications to the International Research Fellowship and 
Senior International Fellowship Programs; Fogarty International 
Research Collaboration and HIV, AIDS and Related Illnesses 
Collaboration Awards; nominations to the Scholars-in-Residence Program; 
and proposals for Scholar's conferences.
    Paula Cohen, Committee Management Officer, Fogarty International 
Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room B2C08, 31 
CENTER DR MSC 2220, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2220, telephone: 301-496-
1491, will provide a summary of the meeting and a roster of the 
committee members upon request.
    Irene Edwards, Executive Secretary, Fogarty International Center 
Advisory Board, Building 31, Room B2C08, telephone: 301-496-1491, will 
provide substantive program information. [[Page 25239]] 
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Ms. Cohen at least 2 weeks in advance of the meeting.

    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.989, 
Senior International Awards Program.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-11597 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Tracy WOODY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a/k/a Central Carolina Bank, a/k/a CCB, a/k/a CCB7; National Commerce Financial Corporation/National Bank of Commerce/NCBC, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-2440.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 2004.

Decided: May 3, 2004.

Tracy Woody, Appellant pro se.

Terry Dean Fisher, Stubbs, Cole, Breedlove, Prentis & Biggs, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tracy Woody appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action as barred by res judicata. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Woody v. Cent. Carolina Bank &*
      *142
      *Trust Co.,*No. CA-02-757-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Harry FIELDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-7841.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). D A T / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. MAR GA R I T O L I R A- L I R A, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 08- 10070 D . C. N o . CR- 0 7 - 0 0 1 1 8 - D CB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a vi d C . B ury , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J anua ry11, 2010 ** B e f o r e : B E E Z E R , T R O T T , a n dB Y B E E , N in th C ir c u it Ju d g e s . M a r g ar ito L ir a - L ir aap p e a ls f r o m h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n a n d7 2 - m o n th s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f

orpos s e s s i on w i th i nt e ntt o di s tr i but e appr oxi m a t e l y212 ki l og ram s of m ar i

j uana, i n v i ol at i on of 21 U . S . C . § 8 41 (a )( 1), (b)( 1)(B )( vi i ). 

# FI LED JAN 26 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSD AT / Res ea r ch 08- 10070 2 P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), L i ra -L i ra ’ s c ou nsel h a s f ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th e r e a r e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w i thdr a w a s c ouns e l of

r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the appe l l antw i th the opportuni tyt o f

i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a lbr i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f or a ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Heriberto VAZQUEZ-SALAZAR, also known as Heriberto Vasquez-Salazar, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50355

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 21, 2004.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Heriberto Vazquez-Salazar, CCA Eden Detention Center, Eden, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Heriberto Vazquez-Salazar in his direct criminal appeal has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion as is required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1896, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Vazquez-Salazar has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel, Vazquez-Salazar’s response, and the record reveals no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 740 

Condemning the attack that occurred in Greenwood, Indiana, on July 17, 

2022, expressing support and prayers for those impacted by that tragedy, 

and praising the actions of Elisjsha Dicken (also known as the ‘‘Good 

Samaritan’’) who valiantly engaged and thwarted the shooter. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2022 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. YOUNG) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the attack that occurred in Greenwood, Indiana, 

on July 17, 2022, expressing support and prayers for 

those impacted by that tragedy, and praising the actions 

of Elisjsha Dicken (also known as the ‘‘Good Samaritan’’) who valiantly engaged and thwarted the shooter. 

Whereas, on July 17, 2022, a shooting took place in Greenwood, Indiana, at the Greenwood Park Mall; 

Whereas 3 innocent lives were lost in that tragedy: Pedro 

Pin ̃eda, Rosa Mirian Rivera de Pin ̃eda, and Victor 

Gomez; 

Whereas, without the actions of Elisjsha Dicken, known as 

the ‘‘Good Samaritan’’, the perpetrator of the attack 

would have killed many more innocent people; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 740 ATS 

Whereas, in the words of Greenwood, Indiana, Chief of Police 

Jim Ison, ‘‘. . . many more people would have died [in 

the shooting] if not for a responsible armed citizen that 

took action very quickly...’’; 

Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for 

a healthy recovery for the individuals who were wounded 

in the attack; 

Whereas all Hoosiers are united in support of the victims and 

their families; and 

Whereas the people of the United States will always remember the victims of this attack and stand in solidarity with 

those affected by this senseless tragedy: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) condemns the senseless attack that led to 

3 the loss of 3 innocent lives in Greenwood, Indiana, 

4 on Sunday, July 17, 2022; 

5 (2) honors the memory of the victims who were 

6 murdered: Pedro Pin ̃eda, Rosa Mirian Rivera de 

7 Pin ̃eda, and Victor Gomez; 

8 (3) expresses hope for a full and speedy recov9 ery for, stands in solidarity with, and pledges contin10 ued support for the individuals injured in the attack; 

11 (4) expresses appreciation and gratitude for all 

12 of the first responders who quickly responded to the 

13 attack and the professionals and volunteers who 

14 cared for the injured; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 740 ATS 

1 (5) expresses appreciation for and honors the 

2 courageous, heroic, valiant, and virtuous actions of 

3 Elisjsha Dicken, known as the ‘‘Good Samaritan’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Case 3:16-cr-00477-VC Document 38 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:16-cr-00477-VC Document 38 Filed 02/23/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:16-cr-00477-VC Document 38 Filed 02/23/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:16-cr-00477-VC Document 38 Filed 02/23/17 Page 4 of 4
Walter L. BOND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10076.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Betty Caitlin Nicole SMITH, Petitioner, v. Zachary Taylor DANIEL, Respondent.

No. 1D19-1390

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 6, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 14, 2019

Betty Caitlin Nicole Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Zachary Taylor Daniel, pro se, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Order for Fraud Upon the Court on Grounds of Rule 60 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Emergency Time Sensitive Motion for Stay of Fraudulent Order, filed on April 4, 2019, and transferred to this Court for consideration on April 15, 2019, are denied. All other requests for relief are denied.

Wolf, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Circulatory System Devices Panel of the 

Medical Devices Advisory Committee 

Link for Audience/Viewers 

February 13, 2024 - WebCast Link 

YouTube: 

https://youtu.be/FAMui9WFBSg 

Please log on 20 minutes before the webcast to test your signal. 

You may have to refresh your browser before logging on.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES W SCHUBERT,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00856-KAW 

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO 

DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 65

On August 19, 2019, Plaintiff James W. Schubert personally filed a request that the Court 

dismiss the case without prejudice. (Pl.’s Req. to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 65.) Defendants’ opposition 

was due on September 3, 2019. As of the date of this order, no opposition has been filed.

Currently, Plaintiff’s attorney of record is Daniel Alan Grout. Mr. Grout, however, has 

failed to respond to numerous orders, including a July 31, 2019 order to show cause. (Dkt. No. 

64; see also Dkt. Nos. 59, 60.) Thus, the Court finds that Mr. Grout has effectively abandoned 

Plaintiff, and accepts Plaintiff’s filing.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request to dismiss the case without prejudice. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case and serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 10, 2019

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E. James Collord, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc.







/s/ E. James Collord

DATE:  November 13, 2009

E. James Collord, President and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. and will be retained by Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







1



---







2
Antuan R. GOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-794

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 2019

Antuan R. Golden, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm without discussion the denial of Appellant's rule 3.800 motion challenging the legality of his habitual felony offender designation. Additionally, because the claim raised by Appellant in this motion is exactly the same as the as the claim he raised in a prior rule 3.800 motion that was denied on the merits and affirmed on appeal,1 we find this appeal to be frivolous and an abuse of process. *See**State v. McBride* , 848 So. 2d 287, 291 (Fla. 2003) ("Collateral estoppel ... precludes a defendant from rearguing in a successive rule 3.800 motion the same issue argued in a prior motion."); *Carroll v. State* , 192 So. 3d 525, 526-27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ("The postconviction process does not exist simply to give prisoners something to do in order to help them pass the time as they serve their sentences, and every minute the courts are required to spend on meritless postconviction filings is time that cannot be spent on other potentially meritorious cases."). Accordingly, we direct the Clerk to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution within the Department of Corrections for potential disciplinary action against Appellant pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes, and the Department's rules. *See**Ponton v. Willis* , 172 So. 3d 574, 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (explaining that a *Spencer* order is not required before referring the inmate for disciplinary action based upon a frivolous filing).

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, Wetherell, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

1

*Golden v. State* , Case No.1D16-4420, 229 So. 3d 1224 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (table).
Marcia Elaine WIMBERLY, petitioner, v. Jim SMITH, et al.

No. 12M122.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Quentin BIVINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8973.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Do It Right

“| did not wash,
rinse, and sanitize

“Il washed, rinsed, and
sanitized the sink.”

Protect People Everywhere. Always Wash,
Rinse, and Sanitize Equipment Between Uses. *