alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10689]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2195]


Advisory Committee on International Law; Meeting

    A meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Law will take 
place on Thursday, May 18, 1995, from 2:00 to approximately 5:00 p.m., 
as necessary, in room 1207 of the United States Department of State, 
2201 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. The meeting will be chaired by 
the Legal Adviser of the Department of State, Conrad K. Harper, and 
will be open to the public up to the capacity of the meeting room. The 
meeting will focus on the establishment of an international criminal 
court and possible United States Government involvement in genocide 
cases before the International Court of Justice, as well as review of 
other current developments in international law.
    Entry to the building is controlled and will be facilitated by 
advance arrangements. Members of the public desiring access to the 
session should, prior to May 17, 1995, notify the Office of the 
Assistant Legal Adviser for United Nations Affairs (telephone (202) 
647-6771) of their name, Social Security number, date of birth, 
professional affiliation, address and telephone number in order to 
arrange admittance. The above includes government and non-government 
attendees. All attendees must use the ``C'' entrance. One of the 
following valid IDs will be required for admittance: any U.S. driver's 
license with photo, a passport, or a U.S. Government agency ID.

    Dated: April 20, 1995.
Bruce C. Rashkow,
Assistant Legal Adviser for United Nations Affairs; Executive Director, 
Advisory Committee on International Law.
[FR Doc. 95-10689 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-M
Mario COLLIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9041.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN MICHAEL ADEE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 180 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

t1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147372

NORMANDY APARTMENTS

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147372

COA: 311735

Wayne CC: 12-000178-CH

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by 

Merger to BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING,

L.P., f/k/a COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS

SERVICING, L.P.,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and

SANDRA PARKER,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 28, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2018278EN.01002301.xml

| 8.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 278/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 278/23

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2018/1665

of 6 November 2018

appointing a member, proposed by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Luxembourg Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the mandate of Mr Christophe HANSEN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the mandate of Mr Christophe HANSEN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Claudine OTTO, Conseiller en affaires européennes, avis et affaires juridiques à la Chambre de Commerce, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 6 November 2018.

For the Council

The President

H. LÖGER

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11127]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 95-030]


Intent To Grant a Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant an exclusive patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA intends to grant Test Max Systems n Service, Corporation 
of Singapore, having its headquarters in Singapore, an exclusive, 
royalty-bearing, revocable license to practice (1) U.S. Patent No. 
4,266,177, entitled Power Control Factor System for A.C. Induction 
Motors; (2) U.S. Patent No. 4,404,511, entitled Motor Power Factor 
Controller with a Reduced Voltage Starter; (3) U.S. Patent No. 
4,417,190, entitled Control System for an Induction Motor with Energy 
Recover; (4) U.S. Patent No. 4,426,614, entitled Pulsed Thyristor 
Trigger Control Circuit Continued; (5) U.S. Patent No. 4,433,276, 
entitled Three-Phase Power Factor Controller; (6) U.S. Patent No. 
4,439,718, entitled Motor Power Control Circuit for A.C. Induction 
Motors; (7) U.S. Patent No. 4,459,528, entitled Phase Detector for 
Three-Phase Power Factor Controller; and (8) U.S. Patent No. 4,469,998, 
entitled Three-Phase Power Factor Controller with Individual EMF 
Sensing. These patents pertain to the reduction of energy consumption 
for electric motors. The patent license will be for a limited number of 
years and will contain appropriate terms and conditions in accordance 
with the Department of Commerce Licensing Regulations, 37 CFR 404.1 et 
seq. NASA will grant the patent license in accordance with these 
licensing regulations unless the Director of Patent Licensing receives 
written objections to the grant, together with any supporting 
documentation, within 60 days of the date of this notice. The Director 
of Patent Licensing will review all written objections to the grant and 
then recommend to the Associate General Counsel (Intellectual Property) 
whether to grant the license.

DATES: Written objections to this proposed license grant must be 
received by July 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Code GP, 
Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Harry Lupuloff, NASA, Director of 
Patent Licensing at (202) 358-2041.

    Dated: April 28, 1995.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-11127 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
registrant's  financial  statements  as of and for the three month  period ended
July 3, 1999,  and is qualifed in its entirety by  reference  to such  financial
statements:
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                           676,593
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,216,269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,055,457
<PP&E>                                         3,013,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,764,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,502,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,127,870
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                      500,000
<COMMON>                                         397,813
<OTHER-SE>                                      (104,459)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,502,319
<SALES>                                        3,658,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,658,139
<CGS>                                          2,176,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,176,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,623,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                14,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (152,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (152,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (152,483)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.01)



</TABLE>
Case 5:17-cr-00056-LHK Document 7 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity
but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR SABINE
ROYALTY TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper
Senior Vice President, Royalty Management


Date: May 12, 2014

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 99.19

CONSENT OF EXPERT To:

   United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549Alberta Securities CommissionBritish Columbia Securities CommissionManitoba Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionAutorité des marchés financiersNew Brunswick Securities CommissionNorthwest Territories Registrar of SecuritiesNova Scotia Securities CommissionNunavut Registrar of SecuritiesPrince Edward Island Securities OfficeSaskatchewan Financial Services CommissionSecurities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorYukon Registrar of Securitie Rio Alto Mining Limited
 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Shahuindo Heap Leach Project, Cajabamba Peru” dated November 9, 2012”, (the “Report” prepared for Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd) I, Carl Defilippi, do hereby confirm that I am a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 and a co-author of the Report. The undersigned, for himself, pursuant to Section 8.3 of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects confirms thatthis letter is being filed as the consent to the use of extracts from, or summaries of, the Report in the Company's Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "AIF") and to being named in the AIF. The undersigned further acknowledges that the AIF will be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Form 40-F"), and consents to being named in the Form 40-F and authorizes the use of the information represented therein relating to the Report. DATED the 13thday of March 2015 By:

   /s/ Carl E. DefilippiName: Carl E. DefilippiCompany: Kappes, Cassiday & AssociatesTitle: Project Manger


---
STATE of Louisiana v. Fred REIMONENQ

NO. 2019-KK-0367

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 2019

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

GUIDRY, J., would deny.
EXHIBIT C

FILED UNDER SEAL

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 180-3 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 1
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it
No. 07-1575 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v . JULIO CARRION SANTIAGO, Defendant, Appellant.

____________________ No. 07-1718 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee,
v . PEDRO MIRANDA Defendant, Appellant.

___________________ No. 07-1728 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee,
v . JUAN NUNEZ, Defendant, Appellant.

____________________No. 07-2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v . JOSE O. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA The opinion of this Court, issued on March 19, 2009, should be amended as follows. On page 11, replace the last sentence of 1st paragraph which begins "The objection was not preserved at sentencing . . . ." with "Although Nunez did at sentencing contest t h e q uantity of drugs recommende d by the pre-sentence report, the base offense level he requested instead was in fact the one adopted by the district judge, and reasonably so.".
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Mary A. Cade, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Castle Energy Corporation
for the three months ended December 31, 2005.

(1)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report.

(2)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this report fairly present in all material respects
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

(3)  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and (15d-15e) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

(4)  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors:

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.



/S/MARY A. CADE
-------------------------
Mary A. Cade
Chief Financial Officer


February 10, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

DEPOSITIONS

Re: Dkt. No. 1277

Now pending before the Court is a stipulation from the parties to allow certain depositions 

after the August 24, 2017 fact discovery cut-off date. The stipulation is granted as to the lawyer 

witnesses whose testimony is directly affected by the Federal Circuit’s ruling on the 

discoverability of the Stroz Report, but only upon the parties and witnesses advanced agreement 

that the depositions will all occur within one week of the Federal Circuit’s ruling. It is also granted 

for Mr. Kalanick who has already been deposed once. The stipulation is denied as to Mr. Lior, 

Mr. Sebern and Mr. Levandowski as much of their depositions can be completed without the Stroz 

Report and they are important witnesses. If the Stroz Report is ultimately produced they will have 

to sit for their depositions again. The stipulation to continue the depositions of Michael Janosko, 

Eyal Cohen, and Ryan Espinosa is denied for lack of good cause for not meeting the district 

court’s deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 21, 2017 

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge
Carlos S. KENON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
null

2019

481.46808
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**537 KA 13-01617** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TIMOTHY INGRAM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

VALERIE G. GARDNER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PENN YAN (MEGAN P. DADD OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Yates County Court (W. Patrick Falvey, J.), rendered June 18, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while ability impaired by drugs, driving while ability impaired by the combined influence of drugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, driving while ability impaired by the combined influence of drugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs as a class E felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [4-a]; 1193 [1] [c] [i]). Inasmuch as defendant entered a plea of guilty, he “forfeited his present challenge to County Court’s Sandoval ruling” ( People v Condes , 23 AD3d 1149, 1150, lv denied 6 NY3d 774; see People v Johnson , 104 AD3d 705, 706). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the plea colloquy demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal ( see People v Kosty , 122 AD3d 1408, 1408, lv denied 24 NY3d 1220; People v Estevez-Santos , 114 AD3d 1174, 1175, lv denied 23 NY3d 1019). Although defendant’s further contention that his plea was not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered because he gave inconsistent information concerning when he ingested the drugs on the day of the incident survives his waiver of the right to appeal, he failed to preserve that contention for our review ( see People v Davis , 45 AD3d 1357, 1357-1358, lv denied 9 NY3d 1005). In any event, defendant’s contention lacks merit. After defendant indicated that he took the drugs in the morning, well before this accident, the court asked him further questions about the drugs he took and when he took them. In**-2- 537 KA 13-01617** 

response, defendant admitted that he ingested several drugs closer to the time that he operated the vehicle, and he admitted that he was under the influence of those drugs when he drove the vehicle off the road and struck a house ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [4-a]). Thus, “the court conducted an inquiry that ‘was sufficient to ensure that the plea was voluntary’ ” ( People v Zuliani , 68 AD3d 1731, 1732, lv denied 14 NY3d 894).

Finally, defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: May 1, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court