Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 1995 / Notices 24631

respondents would complete a

screening survey. EPA would use the

results of the screening survey to

develop a sample design that would be

applied to individual ICR’s for the

MACT standards development survey.

‘‘Burden Statement: The public

reporting burden for this collection of

information is estimated to average 8.5

hours per response for completing the

screening survey and 85 hours for

completing the MACT standards

development survey. This estimate

includes the time needed to review

instructions, search existing data

sources, gather the data needed and

review the collection of information.

Reporters would complete and submit

the surveys once. EPA would choose a

new set of 6,903 respondents each year.

Respondents: Owners or operators of

facilities which emit hazardous air

pollutants.

Estimated Annual No. of

Respondents: 2,190 MACT Survey

Respondents; 4,713 Screening Survey

Respondents.

Estimated No of Responses per

Respondent: 1.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

226,210 hours.

Frequency of Collection: One time.

Send comments regarding the burden

estimate, or any other aspect of this

information collection, including

suggestions for reducing burden, (please

refer to EPA ICR #1602.02 and OMB

#2060–0239) to:

Sandy Farmer, EPA ICR # 1602.02, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Regulatory Information Division

(2136), 401 M St., S.W., Washington,

D.C. 20460

and

Cris Wolz, OMB # 2060–0239. Office of

Management and Budget, Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

725 17th St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

20530.

Dated: May 3, 1995.

Joseph Retzer,

Director, Regulatory Information Division.

[FR Doc. 95–11393 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

[FRL–5204–7]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.), this notice announces the

Office of Management and Budget’s

(OMB) responses to Agency PRA

clearance requests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandy Farmer (202) 260–2740. Please

refer to the EPA ICR No.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

OMB Responses to Agency PRA

Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

EPA ICR No. 1365.04; AsbestosContaining Materials in Schools Rule

and Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan

Rule (MAP); was approved 03/17/95;

OMB No. 2070–0091; expires 03/31/98.

EPA ICR No. 0794.06; Notification of

Substantial Risk of Injury to Health and

Environment under Section 8(E) of the

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA);

was approved 03/29/95; OMB No. 2070–

0046; expires 06/30/95.

EPA ICR No. 1603.02; Lead-Based

Paint Abatement and Repair and

Maintenance Study in Baltimore; was

approved 03/27/95; OMB No. 2070–

0123; expires 01/31/97.

EPA ICR No. 1704.02; Alternate

Threshold for Low Annual Reportable

Amounts; was approved 03/17/95; OMB

No. 2070–0143; expires 09/30/96.

EPA ICR No. 1360.04; Technical and

Financial Requirements State Program

Approval Procedures, Underground

Storage Tanks; was approved 03/31/95;

OMB No. 2050–0068; expires 03/31/98.

EPA ICR No. 1153.05; NESHAP for

Benzene Equipment Leaks, Information

Requirements—61–V; was approved 03/

31/95; OMB No. 2060–0068; expires 03/

31/98.

EPA ICR No. 1590.02; California Pilot

Test Program: Vehicle Credit Program;

was approved 04/03/95; OMB No. 2060–

0229; expires 04/30/98.

EPA ICR No. 1626.03 National

Emissions Reduction Program,

Amendment; was approved 03/28/95;

OMB No. 2060–0256; expires 05/31/96.

EPA ICR No. 1712.01; NESHAP for

Shipbuilding and Ship Repair, Surface

Coating—63–II; was approved 03/24/95;

OMB No. 2060–0330; expires 03/31/98.

EPA ICR No. 1735.01; AGSTAR

Program; was approved 03/31/95; OMB

No. 2060–0329; expires 03/31/98.

EPA ICR No. 1633.08; Revisions to

Permits Rule under Title IV of Clean Air

Act Concerning Reduced Utilization

Plans and Allowance Surrender; was

approved 03/29/95; OMB No. 2060–

0258; expires 01/31/96.

EPA ICR No. 1733.01. 1994 Detailed

Questionnaire for Transportation

Equipment Cleaning Industry; was

approved 03/21/95; OMB No. 2040–

0179; expires 03/31/98.

EPA ICR No. 1058.05; NSPS (Subpart

E) for Municipal Incinerators; was

approved 03/28/95; OMB No. 2060–

0040; expires 03/31/98.

EPA ICR No. 1743.01; Application for

Motor Vehicle Emission Certification of

Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles

and New Motor Vehicle Engines,

Revisions to the Federal Test Procedures

(FIP); was approved 04/30/95; OMB No.

2060–0332; expires 04/30/98.

EPA ICR 1736.01; Natural gas Star

Program; was approved 03/31/95; OMB

No. 2060–0328; expires 03/31/98.

OMB Disapprovals

EPA ICR No. 1686.01; NESHAP for

the Secondary Lead Smelter Industry

Reporting and Recordkeeping

Requirements—Part 63, Subpart X; was

disapproved 03/10/95.

EPA ICR No. 0783.31; Application for

Motor Vehicle Emission Certification

and Fuel Economy Labeling, Small

Nonload Engine (Proposed Rule); was

disapproved 03/29/95.

OMB Extensions of Expiration Dates

EPA ICR No. 1189.04; Identification,

Listing and Rulemaking Petitions; OMB

No. 2050–0053; expiration date

extended to 07/31/95.

EPA ICR No. 1668.01; Oil Pollution

Prevention National Survey; OMB No.

2050–0134; expiration date extended to

06/30/95.

EPA ICR No. 0107.04; Source

Compliance and State Action Reporting;

OMB No. 2060–0096; expiration date

extended to 07/31/95.

EPA ICR No. 0012.08; Motor Vehicle

Exclusions Determination, Marine

Engine Exclusion Determination; OMB

No. 2060–0124; expiration date

extended to 07/31/95.

EPA ICR No. 0167.04; Verification of

Test Parameters and Parts List for LightDuty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks and

Heavy-Duty Engines; OMB No. 2060–

0094; expiration date extended to 10/31/

95.

EPA/OMB Withdrawal

EPA ICR No. 1734.01; Use and

Exposure Information Voluntary Project;

was withdrawn from OMB by EPA.

Dated: May 3, 1995.

Joe Retzer,

Director, Regulatory Information Division.

[FR Doc. 95–11394 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M
24632 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 1995 / Notices

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

[DA 95–967]

Petition for Declaratory Ruling

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Public Notice.

SUMMARY: The Commission requests

comment on a Petition for Declaratory

Ruling filed by In-Flight Phone Corp (InFlight). The petition asks that the

Commission consider In-Flight’s

pioneer’s preference request, which

originally was filed in ET Docket No.

92–100, in ET Docket No. 94–32.

DATES: Comments are due May 19, 1995.

Reply comments are due May 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas P. Derenge, (202) 776–1621,

Office of Engineering and Technology,

Federal Communications Commission,

Washington, DC 20554.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comment Sought on In-Flight Phone

Corp. Petition for Declaratory Ruling

April 28, 1995.

On March 16, 1995, In-Flight Phone

Corp. (In-Flight) filed a Petition for

Declaratory Ruling requesting that its

pioneer’s preference (PP) Request filed

in the Narrowband Personal

Communications Services proceeding,

ET Docket No. 92–100, now be

considered in ET Docket No. 94–32,

Allocation of Spectrum Below 5 GHz

Transferred from Federal Government

Use. Specifically, In-Flight requests that

the Commission rule that: (1) Its PP

Request was filed by the deadline

applicable to permit consideration in ET

Docket No. 94–32, in which the Second

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Second

NPRM) proposes that the 4660–4685

MHz band be allocated to a General

Wireless Communications Service

(GWCS); and (2) that the request will be

considered in that docket.

In-Flight filed its PP Request in ET

Docket No. 94–100 on October 30, 1992,

seeking a preference in the 901–902

MHz and 940–941 MHz bands for a live

ground-to-air audio news, information,

and entertainment service for airline

passengers. However, because the rules

adopted in ET Docket No. 94–100 were

not related to In-Flight’s proposal, its PP

Request has not been acted upon by the

Commission.

On May 4, 1994, the Commission

released a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) in ET

Docket No. 94–32, seeking information

on potential applications of 50

megahertz of transferred Federal

Government spectrum. On November 8,

1994, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

(NPRM) was released proposing the

allocation of the spectrum, and a First

Report and Order and Second Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking was released on

February 17, 1995. The Second NPRM

proposed that the 4660–4685 MHz band

be allocated for a GWCS.

In-Flight argues that is PP Request

should be considered in ET Docket No.

94–32 because the proposed service

rules would allow it to apply for a

license to provide its service in the

4660–4685 MHz band. In-Flight claims

that the service for which the preference

is sought is identical in all relevant

respects to the service it would provide

as a GWCS licensee. Finally, In-Flight

requests that the Commission issued the

requested ruling well in advance of the

August 10, 1995 statutory deadline for

issuing final rules in ET Docket No. 94–

32, so that the Commission will have

sufficient time to decide whether to

award a pioneer’s preference to InFlight.

We herein request comment on InFlight’s Petition for Declaratory Ruling.

Comments are due May 19, 1995, and

reply comments are due May 31, 1995.

We note that In-Flight’s PP Request has

been formally opposed. Accordingly,

the PP Request constitutes a restricted

Commission proceeding in which ex

parte presentations are prohibited: see

47 CFR 1.1208(c).

The Petition for Declaratory Ruling

and related materials are available for

inspection in the Office of Engineering

and Technology, Suite 480, 2000 M

Street N.W., Washington, DC during

regular business hours M–F 8:00 AM to

5:00 PM. This material may also be

purchased from the Commission’s

duplication contractor, International

Transcription Service, Inc., 2100 M

Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, DC

20036, (202) 857–3800. For further

information, contact Thomas Derenge in

the Office of Engineering and

Technology, (202) 739–0703.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11285 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

[Report No. 2069]

Petition for Reconsideration of Actions

in Rulemaking Proceedings

May 2, 1995.

Petition for reconsideration have been

filed in the Commission rulemaking

proceedings listed in this Public Notice

and published pursuant to 47 CFR

Section 1.429(e). The full text of this

document are available for viewing and

copying in Room 239, 1919 M Street,

NW., Washington, DC or may be

purchased from the Commission’s copy

contractor ITS, Inc. (202) 857–3800.

Opposition to this petition must be filed

May 24, 1995. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of

the Commission’s rules (47 CFR

1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must

be filed within 10 days after the time for

filing oppositions has expired.

Subject: Eligibility for the Specialized

Mobile Radio Services and Radio

Services in the 220–222 MHz Land

Mobile Band and Use of Radio

Dispatch Communications. (GEN

Docket No. 94–90)

Number of Petition Filed: 1

Subject: Allocation of the 219–220 MHz

Band for Use by the Amateur Radio

Service. (ET Docket No. 94–40)

Number of Petition Filed: 1

Subject: Amendment of Part 90 of the

Commission’s Rules to Adopt

Regulations for Automatic Vehicle

Monitoring Systems. (PR Docket No.

93–61)

Number of Petitions Filed: 20.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–11283 Filed 5–8–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

The Chase Manhattan Corporation;

Application to Engage in Nonbanking

Activities

The Chase Manhattan Corporation,

New York, New York (Applicant); has

applied pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of

the Bank Holding Company Act (12

U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) (BHC Act) and §

225.23(a)(3) of the Board’s Regulation Y

(12 CFR 225.23(a)(3)) to acquire U.S.

Trust Corporation’s wholly-owned

direct subsidiary, Mutual Funds

Services Company, Boston,

Massachusetts (MF Services), and

thereby engage in providing

administrative services to mutual funds;

and to acquire U.S. Trust Corporation’s

wholly-owned direct subsidiary U.S.

Trust Company of Wyoming, Cody,

Wyoming (UST-WY), and thereby

engage in serving as an investment

advisor pursuant to § 225.25(b)(4)(ii) of

the Board’s Regulation Y. Applicant

states that the proposed administrative

services include, but are not limited to,

with respect to any investment company

customer, computing the investment

company’s net asset value and

performance data, coordinating

communications and activities between