alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO 


CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.


SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


The CH Energy Group, Inc. Short-Term Incentive Plan (“STI Plan”) is hereby amended effective February 3, 2009 as follows: 


1.         The definition of “Performance Objectives” contained in Section 2 of the STI Plan is hereby superseded and replaced in its entirety as set forth below:


 


	
            “Performance Objectives” means the measurable or subjective performance objective or objectives established pursuant to this STI Plan for Participants who have received Award Opportunities. Performance Objectives may be described in terms of Company-wide objectives or objectives that are related to the performance of the individual Participant or of a Subsidiary, division, business unit, department, region or function within the Company or Subsidiary in which the Participant is employed and may be based on the following criteria: earnings per share, operating income, revenues, operating margin, profit margin, return on assets, return on equity, return on invested capital, financing, credit ratings, redeployment of capital, cash flow, shareholder value, economic value added, shareholder return (measured in
terms of stock price appreciation) and/or total shareholder return (measured in terms of stock price appreciation and/or dividend growth), new customers, cost controls, operating efficiencies, product development, strategic partnering, research and development, market penetration, geographic business expansion, cost targets, productivity, employee satisfaction, management of employment practices and employee benefits, supervision of litigation or labor negotiations, dealings with regulatory bodies, acquisitions or divestitures, delivery cost per kilowatt hour or delivery cost per millions of cubic feet of natural gas, customer satisfaction, program development, frequency or duration of electric or gas service interruptions, number of or severity of gas leaks, avoidance of environmental, public or employee safety  problems, realization of the regulated return on equity, and/or strategic business criteria related to a Participant’s area or areas of responsibility.  The Performance
Objectives may be made relative to the performance of other corporations or entities.
 


 





	
            2.
 	
            Except as explicitly set forth herein, the STI Plan will remain in full force and effect.
 









	
             
 	
            CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.
 





 


 





	
             
 	
            By:____________________________________
 









	
             
 	
            Steven V. Lant
 









	
             
 	
            Chairman of the Board, President and
 









	
             
 	
            Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-276]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision


Cornerstone Bank, F.S.B., Mission Viejo, CA; Notice of 
Appointment of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
Sec. 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision has duly appointed the Resolution Trust Corporation as sole 
Receiver for Cornerstone Bank, F.S.B., Mission Viejo, California, on 
December 16, 1994.

    Dated: December 30, 1994.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Kimberly M. White,
Corporate Technician.
[FR Doc. 94-276 Filed 1-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Frank P. WOOD, petitioner, v. Kimberly CLIPPER, Warden.

No. 12-9570.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
دل کی صحت 

شاید آپ سمجھتے ہوں کہ دل کی بیامری 

رصف مردوں کو ہی متاثر کرتی ہے۔ یہ سچ 

نہیں۔ دل کی بیامری عورتوں میں ہونے والی 

اموات کی بڑی وجوہات میں سے ایک ہے۔ 

ایف ڈی اے کے پاس آپ کو اپنے دل کے 

بارے میں اچھے فیصلے کرنے میں مدد دینے 

کے لیے کچھ مشورے ہیں۔ 

اسپرین کے متعلق حقیقت 

جانئیے۔ 

دل کے دورے سے بچاؤ کے لیے اسپرین کا روزانہ استعامل ہر 

کسی کے لیے ٹھیک نہیں ہے۔

• اپنے ڈاکٹر سے پوچھیے کہ کیا آپ کو اسپرین کا استعامل کرنا چاہیے۔

• اگر اسپرین آپکے لیے صحیح ہے تو معلوم کریں کہ :

۔ آپ کو کتنی مقدار لینی چاہیے۔

۔ کتنی مرتبہ اس کا استعامل کریں۔

سپرین کتنے عرصے تک استعامل کریں۔ 

کچھ مصنوعات میںاسپرین کے ساتھ کچھ اور اجزاء بھی موجود ہوتے 

ہیں اور ان کا استعامل ملبے عرصے کے لیے ٹھیک نہیں۔ 

 ۔ ا

اپنے ڈاکٹر یا صحت کے عملے کو ان متام دوائیوں اور سپلیمنٹ کے بارے میں 

آگاہ کریں جو آپ لیتے ہیں۔ آپکے فشار خون کا خطرہ بڑھ سکتا ہے اگر آپ 

اسپرین کے ساتھ دیگر دوائیوں، وٹامن یا جڑی بوٹیوں کا استعامل کرتے ہیں۔ 

•

دل کے دورے کی عالمات 

جانئیے۔

دل کے دورے کی عالمات مردوں اور خواتین میں مختلف ہو 

سکتی ہیں۔

آپکے کندھوں کے جوڑوں کے درمیان یا پھر آپکے سینے اور پیٹھ میں 

شدید درد

•

• اوپرے دھڑ میں تیزی سے اٹھنے واال درد

• سانس لینے میں مشکل

• ھنڈے پسینے آناٹ

• غیر معمولی یا بغیر وجہ کے تھکاوٹ محسوس ہونا

• چکر آنا

• تلی محسوس ہونا م

Health s’Women of Office FDA

 womenshearthealth/gov.fda.www
دل کی صحت

یہ معلوماتی صفحہ خواتین کی صحت کے ایف ڈی اے دفرت کی طرف سے ترتیب دیا گیا ہے۔

 خواتین کی دل کی صحت کے متعلق مزید معلومات کے لیے ایف ڈی اے کی ویب سائٹ پر جائیں: 

womenshearthealth/gov.fda.www

اپنے دل کی حالت 

کو سنبھالیے۔ 

دل کی عام بیامریاں مثالً بلند فشار خون، ذیابیطیس 

اور بلند کولیسٹرول وغیرہ آپ کے لیے دل کی 

بیامری کے خطرے کو بڑھا سکتی ہیں۔

اپنی دوائیں ہدایات کے مطابق استعامل کریں۔ دوائیں لینا 

ہرگز بندنہ کریں حتی کہ آپ کا ڈاکٹر کہے۔ 

•

اگر آپ کو ذیابیطیس ہے تو اپنے خون مین شکر کی مقدار 

کی جانچ کریں۔

•

• اپنے فشار خون اور کولیسٹرول کی جانچ کروائیں۔ 

اگر آپ حاملہ ہیں تو اپنے ڈاکٹر سے معلوم کریں کہ آپ 

اپنی صحت کا حمل کے دوران کیسے خیال رکھ سکتے ہیں۔ 

•

کچھ خواتین کو اپنے دل کے کام میں مدد کے لیے ایک آلے 

کی رضورت پڑتی ہے۔ اپنے ڈاکٹر سے مشورہ کیجیے کہ آپ 

کے لیے کون سا آلہ بہرتین ہے۔ 

•

دل کے لیے صحت مند 

غذا کھائیے۔

کھانے کی لیبل پر لکھی ہوئی غذائی معلومات آپ کو صحت 

مندانہ انتخاب 

• ایسی غذا کا انتخاب کریں جو کم منک یا کم سوڈیم والی ہو۔ 

ٹرانس فیٹ والی غذاؤں کا استعامل محدود کریں۔ زیادہ 

ٹرانس فیٹ دل کے دورے کا سبب بن سکتا ہے۔ 

•

شکر کا استعامل کم کریں۔ شکر کو گلوکوز، فرکٹوز ، سکروز 

یا پھر کارن سیرپ کے طور پر بھی لکھا جا سکتا ہے۔ 

• 

دل کی صحت )URDU )2021
Case No.: 5:17-cv-00626-EJD

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

HECTOR DE LEON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MASTRIA INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00626-EJD 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 48

Plaintiffs brought the instant lawsuit against Defendants, alleging that Defendants failed to 

pay them overtime pay in violation of the Fair Labor and Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. 

§ 201 et seq. and various state law provisions. Dkt. No. 9. Presently before the Court is a motion 

to dismiss filed by Plaintiffs seeking dismissal of their claim under FLSA. Dkt. No. 48. 

Defendants do not oppose this motion. Dkt. No. 50.

“[A] litigant may abandon a claim by communicating his desire to do so to the district 

court.” Pitts v. Terrible Herbst, Inc., 653 F.3d 1081, 1094 (9th Cir. 2011). At the same time, 

FLSA’s provisions are mandatory and “FLSA rights cannot be abridged by contract or otherwise 

waived because this would ‘nullify the purposes’ of the statute.” Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best 

Freight Sys., Inc., 450 U.S. 728, 740, 101 S. Ct. 1437, 1445 (1981). Accordingly, in light of the 

parties’ apparent agreement but mindful of the mandatory nature of FLSA, the Court will 

DISMISS Plaintiff’s FLSA claim WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

A district court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim if the 

district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. 
Case No.: 5:17-cv-00626-EJD

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

§ 1367(c)(3). Having dismissed Plaintiffs’ only federal law claim, the Court declines to exercise 

supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims. These claims are 

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

The Clerk shall close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 18, 2018

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10713 Summary Calendar

ANTOINE EARL POWELL ,
Petitioner

- Appellant

v.
RODNEY W. CHANDLER , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14

- CV

- 493

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Anto in e Earl Powell, federal prisoner # 56375

- 180, appeals from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his sentence following his guilty plea to possession with the intent to distribute at least 50 gr ams of
crack cocaine and possession of a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime . We review the dismissal de novo. Pack v. Yusuff , 218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 23, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10713 Document: 00512480715 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/23/2013No. 13

- 10713

As the district court determined, Powell seeks to challenge the validity of his sentence rather than the manner in which his sentence has been executed, his petition properly arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2 255. Id . at 451

- 52. A § 2255 motion must be brought by the movant in the court that sentenced him. § 2255(a); Ojo v. INS , 106 F.3d 680, 683 (5th Cir. 1997). T he district court did

n ot impose the sentence at issue; thus, it did not err by dismissing the petition rather than construing it as a § 2255 motion. See Ojo , 106 F.3d at 683. The judgmen t is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-10713 Document: 00512480715 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/23/2013
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 14506 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:10

- cr - 00252

- JSM

- TBM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus VICTOR HUGO BRAVO ARMENDARIZ, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (July 1 3, 2021) Before MARTIN , BRANCH and LUCK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-14506 Date Filed: 07/13/2021 Page: 1 of 22 Stephen Langs , appointed counsel for Victor Armendariz in this appeal of the revocation of Armendariz’s supervised release and sentence imposed upon revocation , has moved to withdraw fro m further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because indep endent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED , and Armendariz’s revocation of supervised release and sentence imposed upon revocation are AFFIRMED

.

USCA11 Case: 20-14506 Date Filed: 07/13/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Grier MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3048

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Gold Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  November 7, 2005


/s/ Tim Coupland
-------------------------------------------
Tim Coupland, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FINJAN LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF 

ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL TO 

JUNE 4, 2021, SETTING JURY 

INSTRUCTION AND CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES

The Court CONTINUES the jury trail currently set to start on January 11, 2021 to June 4, 

2021. The Court SETS the jury instruction conference for June 3, 2021 at 1:30pm and a further

case management conference for May 6, 2021 at 1:30pm. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 16, 2020

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 738 Filed 12/16/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10948]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in accordance with Public 
Law 103-446, gives notice that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on 
Minority Veterans will be held June 5-8, 1995, in Washington, DC. The 
purpose of the Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans is to advise the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the administration of VA benefits and 
services for minority veterans and to assess the needs of minority 
veterans and evaluate whether VA compensation, medical and 
rehabilitation services, outreach, and other programs are meeting those 
needs. The committee will make recommendations to the Secretary 
regarding such activities.
    The sessions will convene in room 230, VA Central Office Building, 
810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. on June 5, from 9 a.m. to 5:30 
p.m. and end on June 8 at 12 noon. All sessions will be open to the 
public up to the seating capacity of the room. Because the capacity is 
limited, it will be necessary for those wishing to attend toe contact 
Mrs. Angelia Sare, Department of Veterans Affairs (phone 202 273-6708) 
prior to June 1, 1995. Limited time will be allocated for the purpose 
of receiving oral presentations from the public, however prior 
notification of request to speak will be required. The Committee will 
accept appropriate written comments from interested parties on issues 
affecting minority veterans. Such comments should be referred to the 
Committee at the following address: Advisory Committee on Minority 
Veterans, Center for Minority Veterans (008D), U.S. Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: April 26, 1995.

    By Direction of the Secretary:
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-10948 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99(b)

                             TXU US Holdings Company


                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

     The undersigned, Erle Nye, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive of TXU
US Holdings Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended
   September  30, 2002 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements
   of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
   and

2. Information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has caused  this  instrument  to be
executed this 14th day of November, 2002.




                                      /s/   Erle Nye
                           ------------------------------------------------
                           Name: Erle Nye
                           Title: Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Fred Zolla, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of iMedicor, Inc for the year ended June 30, 2012;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. As the issuer's certifying officer I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this year-end report is being prepared;





b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and





c.   presented in this year-end report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





6. As the registrant’s certifying officer I have indicated in this year-end report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.








/s/ Fred Zolla


Fred Zolla


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: March 22, 2013
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation and "the Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the perio d from January 1, 2007 through December 31,  2007 ("the Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections  229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii)  of the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party ("the Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for  residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting  Party served as the residential and commercial tax service provider ("the Platform"). The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and  for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP , an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable  Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion. FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.  By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC General Partner /s/ Lucy A Przybyla  Lucy Przybyla Senior Vice President February 12, 2008[
# C_2018303EN.01002301.xml

| 29.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/23

---

Corrigendum to Council Recommendation of 6 March 2018 concerning a roadmap for the implementation of PESCO

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 88 of 8 March 2018
  )

(2018/C 303/11)

On page 3, point 12, second sentence:

for:

‘... with Article 5(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 ...’,

read:

read:

‘... with Article 5(3) of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 ...’.

---