alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 20790-20791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10338]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2193]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Subcommittee for the Prevention 
of Marine Pollution; Meeting

    The Subcommittee for the Prevention of Marine Pollution (SPMP), a 
subcommittee of the Shipping Coordinating Committee, will conduct an 
open meeting on May 19, 1994, from 9:30 am to 12 noon in Room 6103 of 
U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street SW., Washington, DC.
    The purpose of this meeting is to seek input from the public to 
assist development of the U.S. position regarding the application of 
the precautionary approach to the International Maritime Organization's 
(IMO) work.
    At the 35th Session of the Marine Environmental Protection 
Committee (MEPC) of IMO in March, 1994, a Correspondence Group was 
established [[Page 20791]] with the following terms of reference: ``To 
develop guidelines on the application of the precautionary approach as 
set out in Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration, as well as paragraphs 
17.21 and 17.22 of the United Nations Conference on Environment and 
Development, Agenda 21, in the context of specific IMO activities, and 
to report to the MEPC at its thirty-seventh session''.
    Work was carried out intersessionally to identify a working method 
to internalize the application of the precautionary approach. This work 
was carried into the 36th Session of the MEPC in November, 1994 where a 
drafting group developed draft ``Guidelines on the Application of the 
Precautionary Approach in the Context of Specific IMO Activities''. In 
this draft, the precautionary approach is further elaborated for the 
purpose of IMO. Additionally, the drafting group developed a draft 
``Framework for Implementation of the Precautionary Approach within the 
Programs and Activities of IMO'' which provides a working method to be 
used by IMO Committees, Sub-Committees, Working Groups and other IMO 
bodies to internalize the precautionary approach into the process of 
policymaking and management.
    The draft Guidelines and Framework are the subject of further 
consideration by the intersessional correspondence group, working 
toward tabling these documents at the 37th Session of the MEPC.
    Input or comments from the public meeting will be considered by 
members of the U.S. correspondence group in finalizing the U.S. 
position on these documents. For further information or copies of the 
drafts, contact the project officer, Commander Mike Farley, U.S. Coast 
Guard Headquarters (G-MEP-3), 2100 Second Street SW., Washington, DC 
20593-0001, Telephone: (202) 267-2850.

    Dated: April 18, 1995.
Charles A. Mast,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-10338 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
Употребление приготовленной пищи, которая хранилась более

7 дней, может стать причиной плохого самочувствия клиентов!

Защита людей в любой ситуации.

Используйте или утилизируйте охлажденную 

приготовленную пищу в течение 7 дней!

Срок при температуре 41°F (5°C) в днях

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection
Keeping prepared foods longer than

7 days can make your customers sick!

Protect People Everywhere.

Serve or discard refrigerated,

prepared food within 7 days!

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection

Days at 41oF (5oC)
Franklin Lamar WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9443.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Simmons Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
By: /s/ Ron Hooper
Ron Hooper

SVP, Royalty Trust Management

Simmons Bank

Date: November 7, 2019 
**
Exhibit 21

Zep Inc.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                |  |                                                             
|------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary or Affiliate         |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                | 
|Zep IP Holdings LLC             |  | Georgia                                                     
|                                | 
|Old ABI, LLC                    |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                | 
|Acuity Specialty Products, Inc. |  | Georgia                                                     
|-Acuity Holdings, Inc           |  | Canada                                                      
|-Acuity Enterprise, Inc.        |  | Delaware                                                    
|-Zep Europe B.V.                |  | Netherlands                                                 
|-Zep Belgium S.A.               |  | Belgium                                                     
|-Zep Italia S.r.l               |  | Italy                                                       
|-Graham International B.V.      |  | Netherlands                                                 
|-Zep Benelux B.V.               |  | Netherlands                                                 
|-Zep Industries B.V.            |  | Netherlands                                                 
|-Zep Manufacturing B.V.         |  | Netherlands
Juan Israel GONZALES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9446.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
H. Con. Res. 25 Agreed to March 29, 2023

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-three 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR A CEREMONY AS PART 

OF THE COMMEMORATION OF THE DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF VICTIMS OF THE HOLOCAUST. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor 

Center is authorized to be used on April 20, 2023, for a ceremony 

as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims 

of the Holocaust. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the ceremony 

described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with 

such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
Reinstated; Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion 

filed February 10, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00769-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF DANIEL BANDA AND LINA 

MARIA MARTINEZ

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-68191

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 18, 2014. On November 13, 

2014, this court referred the case to mediation. On January 30, 2015, appellant 

Lina Maria Martinez filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the case has 

settled. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.45

                     AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         Amendment No. 4 dated as of January 1, 2004 to Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of July l, 1999 between Brightpoint, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Employer" or the "Company"), and Steven E. Fivel (the
"Employee").

         WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee have entered into an amended and
restated employment agreement dated as of July 1, 1999, as amended by those
certain amendments dated as of January 1, 2001, January 1, 2002 and January 1,
2003 (the "Employment Agreement");

         WHEREAS, the Employer and Employee wish to amend the section of the
Employment Agreement as provided below to reflect the increased base salary of
the Employee as recently approved by the Compensation & Human Resources
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Directors of
the Company;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Employer and Employee hereby amend section III.A of
the Employment Agreement to provide as follows:

         III.     Compensation.

                           "A.      During the term of this Agreement, the
Employer shall pay the Employee a salary (the "Salary") at a rate of $335,000
per annum in respect of each Employment Year, payable in equal monthly
installments on the first day of each month, or at such other times as may
mutually be agreed upon between the Employer and the Employee. Such Salary may
be increased from time to time at the discretion of the Board."

Except as provided above all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this
Amendment as of the date first above written.

                                            BRIGHTPOINT, INC.

                                            By: /s/ Robert J. Laikin
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Name:  Robert J. Laikin
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                            By: /s/ Steven E. Fivel
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Name: Steven E. Fivel
Charles Alexander RYAHIM, petitioner, v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.

No. 12-9805.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 80 

 FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 588-12 Filed 06/12/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 11.1



                            Castle Energy Corporation
                 Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                  Three Months Ended December 31,
                                                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        2002                                    2001
                                                          --------------------------------        --------------------------------
                                                              Basic             Diluted                Basic           Diluted
                                                          -------------      -------------        --------------    --------------
<S>                                                       <C>                <C>                  <C>               <C>
     I.  Shares Outstanding, Net of Treasury
            Stock Purchased and Options
            Exercised During the Period:

               Stock, net                                     6,592,884          6,592,884             6,632,884         6,632,884
               Purchase of treasury stock (weighted)
                                                          -------------      -------------        --------------    --------------
                                                              6,592,884          6,592,884             6,632,884         6,632,884


    II.  Weighted Equivalent Shares:

               Assumed options and warrants exercised                               10,418                                 120,746
                                                          -------------      -------------        --------------    --------------


   III.  Weighted Average Shares and Equivalent Shares        6,592,884          6,603,302             6,632,884         6,753,630
                                                          =============      =============        ==============    ==============

    IV.  Net Income (Loss)                                $         245      $         245        ($         272)   ($         272)
                                                          =============      =============        ==============    ==============


     V.  Net Income (Loss) Per Share                      $         .04      $         .04        ($         .04)   ($         .04)
                                                          =============      =============        ==============    ==============





</TABLE>
DeAngelo Lavale THORPE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9452.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN GRIEBENOWAllan Griebenow, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

DIANA ROHRER, Individually and ) 

DIANA ROHRER and DAWN ) 

CUBBERNUSS as co-Administrators of ) 

The ESTATE OF DANIEL RICHARD ) 

ROHRER, Deceased, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

v. ) CAUSE NO.: 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC., aka NEW ENGLAND ) 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, AMERIDOSE ) 

LLC, ALAUNUS PHARMACEUTICAL ) 

LLC, BARRY CADDEN, individually, ) 

LISA CADDEN, individually, and ) 

GREGORY CONIGLIARO, individually, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendants Barry Cadden, Lisa Cadden and Greg Conigliaro 

(“Defendants”), by counsel, hereby move this Court for an extension of time to respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and including March 27, 2013. Defendants’ Answer is currently due 

February 25, 2013. Plaintiff’s counsel has been consulted and has no objection to the requested 

extension. 

WHEREFORE, Defendants, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendants up to and 

including March 27, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises. 

 

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 20 filed 02/19/13 page 1 of 2
2 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

DINA M. COX, #18590-49 

KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO, #28058-49 

ROBERT M. BAKER IV, #25471-49 

JANELLE M. KILIES, #30708-49 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 19, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Richard W. Crowder 

211 S Third St 

Goshen IN 46526 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Knight S. Anderson 

TUCKER ELLIS, LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Counsel for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

William N. Riley 

Jamie R. Kendall 

PRICE WAICUKAUSKI & RILEY, LLC 

301 Massachusetts Ave. 

Indianapolis, IN 46204 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

/s/ Kameelah Shaheed-Diallo 

 KAMEELAH SHAHEED-DIALLO 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202-6150 

Telephone: (317) 237-0500 

Facsimile: (317) 630-2790 

kshaheed-diallo@lewiswagner.com

Q:\NECC\9 - Rohrer\Federal Court Pleadings\2nd_MET.docx

case 3:12-cv-00749-JTM-CAN document 20 filed 02/19/13 page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Report of Seven Arts Entertainment, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: September
15, 2014 | By: | /s/ Kate Hoffman            
|------------------------ | --- | ----------------------------
|                         |     | Kate Hoffman                
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer     
|                         |     |                             
|Date: September
15, 2014 | By: | /s/ Candace Wernick         
|                         |     | Candace Wernick             
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer     
|                         |     |                             
|Date: September 15, 2014 | By: | /s/ Candace Wernick         
|                         |     | Candace Wernick             
|                         |     | Principal Accounting Officer



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.