alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00561-NC 

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable William H. Orrick in the 

SAN FRANCISCO division for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future 

filings shall bear the initials WHO immediately after the case number.

All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing 

schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge 

to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior 

briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also 

remain unchanged. 

Dated: March 8, 2017 FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

A true and correct copy of this order has been served by mail upon any pro se parties.

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 21 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED A P R I L 2, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00522

- CV

Tilana Toney, Appellant

v.

Steve Strickland, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KE LLY, AND SMIT H

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the final order signed by the tr i a l court on July 3, 2019 . Having reviewed

the record , the Court holds that Tilana Toney has not prosecuted her appeal and did not comply

with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of

pr osecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the

court below.
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 

Case No. 4:17-00554-YGR 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER 

 & GROSSMANN LLP 

DAVID R. STICKNEY (Bar No. 188574) 

(davids@blbglaw.com) 

BRANDON MARSH (Bar No. 268316) 

(brandon.marsh@blbglaw.com) 

JENNY BARBOSA (Bar No. 292385) 

(jenny.barbosa@blbglaw.com) 

12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 

San Diego, CA 92130 

Tel: (858) 793-0070 

Fax: (858) 793-0323 

Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Miami General Employees’ 

& Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust, Lead Plaintiffs 

Public School Teachers Pension & Retirement Fund of Chicago 

and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and Lead Counsel for the Class 

[Additional counsel appear on signature page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

IN RE RH, INC. SECURITIES 

LITIGATION, 

 

Case No. 4:17-00554-YGR 

ECF CASE 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

COUNSEL 

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Blair A. Nicholas, Esq. (Bar No. 178428) is no longer 

associated with the firm of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, and it is respectfully 

requested that he be withdrawn as counsel for Plaintiff City of Miami General Employees’ & 

Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust (“City of Miami”) in the above-captioned action. 

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, through the undersigned counsel of record, 

continues to serve as counsel for Plaintiff City of Miami, and all future correspondence and papers 

in this action should continue to be directed to them. 

Case 4:17-cv-00554-YGR Document 73 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

CASE NO. 4:17-00554-YGR

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: March 16, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 

BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER 

 & GROSSMANN LLP 

/s/ David R. Stickney 

DAVID R. STICKNEY 

DAVID R. STICKNEY (Bar No. 188574) 

(davids@blbglaw.com) 

BRANDON MARSH (Bar No. 268316) 

(brandon.marsh@blbglaw.com) 

JENNY BARBOSA (Bar No. 292385) 

(jenny.barbosa@blbglaw.com) 

12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 

San Diego, CA 92130 

Tel: (858) 793-0070 

Fax: (858) 793-0323 

 --and-- 

GERALD H. SILK 

(jerry@blbglaw.com) 

AVI JOSEFSON 

(avi@blbglaw.com) 

1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Floor 

New York, New York 10020 

Tel: (212) 554-1493 

Fax: (212) 554-1444 

Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Miami General 

Employees’ & Sanitation Employees’ Retirement 

Trust, Lead Plaintiffs Public School 

Teachers Pension & Retirement Fund of 

Chicago and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, 

and Lead Counsel for the Class

Case 4:17-cv-00554-YGR Document 73 Filed 03/16/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11077]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (USAID)


Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Task Force on Community 
Colleges on May 26, 1995, from 1:30 to 5 p.m. The Task Force was 
established by the Board for International Food and Agricultural 
Development and Economic Cooperation.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review the overlapping interest of 
USAID's strategic objectives with the findings and recommendations of 
the draft report entitled: ``Seeking a New Partnership: A Report of the 
Task Force on U.S. Community Colleges.''
    This meeting will be held in room 1205 in the Department of State, 
located at 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC. Any interested person 
may attend and may present oral statements in accordance with 
procedures established by the Chair and to the extent time available 
for the meeting permits.
    Please call Valerie Price (telephone 703/875-4134) no later than 
May 10, 1995, if you plan to attend this meeting. She will need your 
full name, name of employing company or organization, address, phone 
number and social security number to acquire your pass for entering the 
Department of State. On the day of the meeting, she will meet you at 
the diplomatic entrance of the Department of State (2201 C Street, NW., 
Washington, DC) with your pass.
    Those desiring further information may write to Gary W. Bittner in 
care of USAID, room 608F, SA-18, Washington, DC 20523 or telephone him 
on (703) 875-4656.

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Emily Vargas-Baron,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Center for Human Capacity Development.
[FR Doc. 95-11077 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
EX PARTE Christopher Mark GRADY

CR-17-0346

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Montgomery Cir. Ct.
EXHIBIT 13.1
 CERTIFICATION
    1.
    
    the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2010 (the Report), furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 11, 2011/s/ Colm BarringtonColm BarringtonChief Executive OfficerFly Leasing LimitedDate: March 11, 2011/s/ Gary DalesGary DalesChief Financial OfficerFly Leasing Limited
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10962]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP95-187-000 and TM95-2-37-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Technical Conference

April 28, 1995.
    Take notice that at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 18, 1995, the 
Commission staff will convene a technical conference in the above-
captioned proceedings pursuant to an order issued on March 31, 1995.\1\ 
The technical conference will be held at the offices of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First Street, NE., Washington, DC.

    \1\70 FERC para.61,381 (1995).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10962 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 ELIZABETH GOBERT,

Defendant. /

No. CR 17-00093 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY

DWAZENDRA SMITH

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Dwazendra Smith (Dkt. No. 61) is DENIED for

failing to comply with Civil Local Rule 11-3 (applied to criminal actions through Criminal Local

Rule 2-1). The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is an active member in

good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the

District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form

from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as

“Louisiana” — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. 

While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed

until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 30, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

PLAINTIFF WAYMO LLC’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OVER EXHIBITS TO THE STROZ DUE DILIGENCE REPORT

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502) 

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887) 

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886) 

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

PLAINTIFF WAYMO LLC’S MOTION 

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OVER 

CERTAIN EXHIBITS TO THE STROZ 

DUE DILIGENCE REPORT 

[REDACTED VERSION – FILED 

PUBLICLY] 

 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1682 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

PLAINTIFF WAYMO LLC’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER OVER EXHIBITS TO THE STROZ DUE DILIGENCE REPORT

 TO DEFENDANTS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., OTTOMOTTO LLC, AND OTTO 

TRUCKING LLC, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that as soon as the matter may be heard, in the courtroom of the 

Honorable William Alsup at the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California, Plaintiff Waymo LLC (“Waymo”) 

shall and hereby does move the Court for a Protective Order designating certain exhibits to the 

Stroz Due Diligence Report as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under the existing Protective Order in this case. 

Waymo’s motion is based on this notice of motion and supporting memorandum of points 

and authorities, the supporting declaration of Patrick Schmidt and accompanying exhibits, reply 

briefing in further support of this motion and supporting declarations and accompanying exhibits, 

as well as other written or oral argument that Waymo may present to the Court. 

DATED: September 19, 2017 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP 

By /s/Charles K. Verhoeven 

Charles K. Verhoeven 

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC 

 

 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1682 Filed 09/19/17 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10382]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service


National Institutes of Health; Notice of Meeting of the Panel to 
Assess the NIH Investment in Research on Gene Therapy

    Notice is hereby given that the Panel to Assess the NIH Investment 
in Research on Gene Therapy, a fact-finding group reporting to the 
Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD), National Institutes of Health 
(NIH), will meet in public session at the William H. Natcher Building 
(Building 45) Conference Center, Board Room, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, on May 15-16, 1995. The meeting will 
begin at approximately 9:00 a.m. to recess on May 15, and from 
approximately 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on May 16.
    The goal of the Panel is to make recommendations to the ACD about 
the scientific areas that NIH should emphasize and the funding 
mechanisms that should be employed in order best to advance the 
development of gene therapy. The purpose of the meeting is to provide 
the Panel with an opportunity to hear presentations regarding the 
current and anticipated research activities relevant to gene therapy 
that are supported by the various components of NIH, and to discuss how 
to proceed with its assessment of NIH's investment in gene therapy.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other special accommodations, should 
contact the person named below in advance of the hearing.
    Attendance may be limited to seat availability. If you plan to 
attend the meeting as an observer or if you wish additional 
information, please contact Ms. Janice Ramsden, National Institutes of 
Health, Shannon Building, Room 235, 1 Center Drive MSC 0159, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892-0159, telephone (301) 496-0959, fax (301) 496-7451, by 
May 10.
Ruth L. Kirschstein,
Deputy Director, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10382 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Jermaine CLARDY, petitioner, v. Tim BRUNSMAN, Warden.

No. 12-9886.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         I,  Steven F.  Schepman,  Senior  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
Officer of First Banks, Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)   The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of the  Company  for  the
               quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2006 (the "Report")  fully
               complies with the  requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  November 13, 2006

                                              By: /s/ Steven F. Schepman
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                      Steven F. Schepman
                                                      Senior Vice President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      (Principal Financial and
                                                      Accounting Officer)
Charles Lynn BOSWICK, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Case No. 2D17-4784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of AXCESS International Inc. (the “***Company***”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I,Allan Griebenow, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periodsindicated.

 

 
| /S/ ALLAN GRIEBENOW                                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Allan  Griebenow                                                    |   |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer |   |

 

Dated:  November 19, 2010

 

----
Exhibit 10.2


 





 


Heelys Worldwide


3200 Belmeade Drive, Suite 100


Carrollton, TX USA 75006


 


February 9,
2009


 


Mr. Michael
W. Hessong


3985 Summit Court


Fairview, TX 75069


 


Dear
Mike:


 


This
letter will outline the terms and conditions of your consulting assignment with
Heelys, Inc. (the “Company”). You will be an independent contractor and
not an employee of the Company. The scope of the assignment will be to serve as
the Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective on
or about February 11, 2009. The term will be for an initial period of two
months and can be extended on a month to month basis by mutual agreement. This
agreement can be terminated by either party with thirty days notice after the
initial two month period. The consulting fee will be $35,000 per month based
upon five full time days per week and 4.3 weeks per month. As an independent
contractor you will not be subject to any of the employee benefit programs
maintained by the Company. Your routine out of pocket travel and entertainment
expenses to represent the Company will be reimbursed. Furthermore, a travel
advance is authorized if necessitated by travel plans. It is understood you may
continue to interview for a full time position during the assignment with the
Company.


 


As
the Interim President and Chief Executive Officer you will report to the Heelys
board of directors. I will be your liaison to the board but not the sole
reporting link to the board. Your role will be to provide the Company and its
staff with near term direction to execute in accordance with a prioritization
schedule that will be fully coordinated with the directors. I am pleased to
assist you with the prioritization outline that can then be communicated by you
to the directors. The day to day operations and related decisions will be
within your responsibility including full time supervision of all senior
managers. As an independent contractor, you are granted authority to commit the
Corporation for financial issues that would typically occur on a day to day
basis. Authority for decisions exceeding a typical day to day occurrence will
be subject to specific authorization by the board.


 


Mike,
we are all enthused to have you back involved with the Company. Good luck in
the new assignment.


 


Would
you please indicate your acceptance with the terms and conditions of this
assignment by signing below.


 


	
  Best
  regards,

  	
   

  	
  Accepted
  and approved:

  
	
   

   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Gary L. Martin

  	
   

  	
  /s/
  Michael Hessong

  
	
  Gary
  L. Martin

  	
   

  	
  Michael
  Hessong

  
	
  Chairman

  	
   

  	
  Independent
  Contractor
#### William Allen LEGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of MARYLAND; Harford County Government; Harford County Sheriff’s Department; John Walker, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-7506.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 29, 2004.

Decided: May 3, 2004.

William Allen Legg, Appellant pro se.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Allen Legg seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying various post-judgment motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United, States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 22, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on September 16, 2003. Because Legg failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Renee BELL, petitioner, v. FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al.

No. 12M123.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individualcapacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 

SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE FOR

SABINE ROYALTYTRUST
By: /s/ Ron E. Hooper
Ron E. Hooper

SVP, Royalty Trust Management

Date: August 11, 2022 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine RoyaltyTrust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**