alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00388

- CV

Jason Matthew SMITH and Christa Eve Smith,

Appellants

v.

Dana G. KIRK , Trustee of Kirk Ranch Trusts,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law

, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18935C

Honorable Susan Harris , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the portion of the trial

court’s judgment denying appellan ts Jason Matthew Smith and Christa Eve Smith’s motion for

summary judgment is AFFIRMED. The portion of the trial court’s judgment granting appellee

Dana G. Kirk, Trustee of the Kirk Ranch Trusts’, motion for summary judgment is REVERSED.

This case is REMAN DED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It

is ORDERED that costs be assessed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED May 25, 2022.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0073. THE STATE v. ANTHONY.

The State has filed a motion to remand in the above-styled appeal. The State

points out that the appellate record includes the transcript of the sentencing phase of

the defendant’strial, but not the transcript of the guilt phase of the trial, during which

the trial court ruled that certified copies of the defendant’s Florida convictions were

incomplete and would not be considered for purposes of recidivist sentencing. The

State also notesthat the original certified copies of the proffered convictions have not

been included in the appellate record. According to the State, the appellate record is

incomplete without the transcript of the guilt phase of the defendant’s trial and

without the original certified copies of the defendant’s Florida convictions that were

proffered by the State. The State further asserts that, under the circumstances of this

case, “any extension may yet prove to be insufficient time to accomplish the

completion of the record on appeal,” and requeststhat the appeal be remanded so that

the omissions from the record can be corrected. 

The State’s motion to remand is hereby GRANTED. In light of the trial

transcript and proffered exhibits omitted fromthe record on appeal, the indeterminate

amount of time it will take to prepare and transmit these materials to this Court, and

the constitutional time restraints governing this Court’s disposition of appeals, this

appeal is remanded to the Clerk of the Superior Court of Fulton County until

preparation of the appellate record is completed by the addition of the aforementioned

materials. When the entire appeal record is prepared, the matter may then be

transmitted to and re-docketed with the Court of Appeals. Upon re-docketing,

briefing by the parties should proceed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 23.

September 27, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/27/2016
Timothy J. RADEMACHER, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 12-9168.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District, denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                                 GALILEO NEWS
===============================================================================


        Contact:  Greg Riedel, Chief Financial Officer - (508) 347-4222

                    GALILEO REPORTS LOSS OF LARGEST CUSTOMER
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STURBRIDGE, MA, FEBRUARY 12, 1997 - Galileo Corporation (NASDAQ, NM:GAEO),
today reported that it has received written notification from its largest
customer, Xerox Corporation, that Xerox has developed internal production
capabilities for dicorotron assemblies and will no longer purchase these
assemblies from Galileo. These assemblies accounted for approximately $20.4
million, or 48%, of Galileo's revenues of $42.6 million for fiscal 1996 and
approximately $3.8 million, or 39%, of Galileo's revenues of $9.7 million for
the quarter ended December 31, 1996. Reduced revenues from this product will
materially adversely affect Galileo's financial performance for at least the
remainder of fiscal 1997 and likely will result in a loss for the fiscal year.

William Hanley, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, "While we are
disappointed by the abrupt end of our relationship with Xerox and understand
that the impact of reduced revenues from Xerox will be significant to Galileo's
financial performance for the near-term, we believe that our strategy of
diversification into both medical and telecommunication products, as well as
the continued health of our Scientific Detector Products Group, provides a
strong foundation for future growth." He continued, "As an example of the
potential of our Medical Products Group, we recently signed a multi-million     
dollar initial order with Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., for a new proprietary
single use endoscope to be used in a new minimally invasive spinal procedure.
We will be issuing further details regarding this order shortly."

Galileo Corporation develops, manufactures, and markets products based on its
core fiberoptics and electro-optics technologies for applications in office
equipment, analytical instruments, process analysis, telecommunications, and
medical instruments. Galileo markets its products to OEMs, through marketing
partners, and direct to end-users.

Galileo Corporation    Galileo Park    P.O. Box 550    Sturbridge, MA 01566 USA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' 

RETIREMENT BOARD,

Petitioner

v.

RAYMOND J. WHALEN,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 671 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Did the Commonwealth Court abuse its discretion and depart from accepted 

judicial practices in holding that parties to a private settlement agreement may 

dictate what constitutes “compensation” under the Public School Employees’ 

Retirement Code (“Retirement Code”), 24 Pa.C.S. § 8101 et seq.?

(2) Did the Commonwealth Court apply the wrong standard of review to the Public 

School Employees’ Retirement Board’s adjudication by not affording the 

appropriate deference to the Board’s interpretation of the elements necessary to 

establish a settlement payment as “compensation” under the Retirement Code?
여성과 

진통제

여성은 남성과 다르게 통증을 

경험합니다

• 여성은 남성보다 더 많은 통증을 

보고합니다.

• 두통과 허리 통증과 같이 어떤 종류의 

장기 (만성) 통증은 여성에게 더 흔합니다.

• 여성은 남성보다 처방 진통제에 더 

신속하게 의존적이 될 수 있습니다.

• 여성은 남성보다 더 많이 처방 진통제를 

받고, 더 높은 용량을 받으며 더 장기간 

처방 진통제를 받을 가능성이 높습니다.

미식품의약국 (FDA) 여성 보건 부서

www.fda.gov/womens

진통제 종류

처방 없이 구입 가능한 약

처방 없이 구입 가능한 약들은 두통, 감기, 그리고 

생리통에 사용되는 흔한 제품들입니다. 처방 없이 

구입 가능한 약들은 아세트아미노펜과 아스피린이나 

낮은 용량의 아이보프로핀과 같은 비스테로이드계 

항염증제들입니다. 

처방약

• 비아편제 – 통증을 치료하는 약. 처방 비아편제는 

디클로페낙과 아이보프로핀을 포함합니다. 

아이보프로핀은 처방 없이 구입 가능하지만 

담당 의료 제공자는 더 높은 용량을 제공할 수 

있습니다.

• 아편제 – 수술 후 통증과 같이 중간에서 심각한 

정도의 통증 경감에 효과적인 약입니다. 흔한 

아편제는 옥시코돈, 하이드로코돈, 펜타닐, 그리고 

몰핀입니다.

진통제는 지시 사항대로 사용했을 경우 진통을 

경감시키는데 효과적일 수 있습니다. 그러나 이러한 

약들은 잘못 사용되거나 남용되었을 경우 심각한 

부상이나 사망에 이르게 할 수 있습니다. 또한 중독이 

될 수도 있습니다.

담당 의료 제공자와 어떻게 안전하게 진통제를 

사용할 수 있는지 상담하는 것이 중요합니다. 또한 

통증을 치료할 수 있는 방법들에 대하여 담당 의료 

제공자에게 문의하십시오.

이 정보지를 사용하여 어떻게 안전하게 진통제를 

사용할 수 있는지 담당 의료 제공자와 상담하십시오.

처방 없이 구입 가능한 약과 처방약 둘 다에 대하여 

심각한 잠재 위험과 이점이 있습니다. 
?

여성과 진통제

이 정보지는 미식품의약국 (FDA) 여성 보건 부서에서 제작되었습니다. 여성 보건 관련 다른 정보를 얻

기 위해서는 다음을 방문해 주십시오:

www.fda.gov/womens

• 통증을 효과적으로 관리하기 위하여 

아편제를 사용하거나 다른 방법을 사용해야 

하는지 담당 의료 제공자에게 문의하십시오.

아편제는 모든 사람들에게 좋은 것은 아니며 

모든 종료의 통증에 좋은 것도 아닙니다.

• 자신의 통증 정도를 기록하십시오. 언제 

통증을 느끼며 어떤 느낌이며 어느 신체 

부위가 아픈지 기록하십시오. 의료 제공자와 

이 기록한 것을 공유하십시오.

• 처방 진통제를 다른 사람과 공유하지 

마십시오. 진통제를 어느 장소에 잠궈 두고 

어린이와 다른 사람들로부터 멀리 두십시오.

• 진통제를 처방된 기간보다 오래 복용하지 

마십시오. 약에 대한 정보를 얻으십시오. 

얼마나 오래 복용해야 하는지 알아내십시오. 

다른 약을 복용하고 있다면 진통제와 

같이 복용해도 되는지 의료 제공자에게 

문의하십시오. 

2021

진통제는 잘못 사용되거나 남용되었을 경우 심각한 부상이나 사망에 이르게 할 수 

있습니다. 자신과 자신의 사랑하는 사람들을 보호하기 위하여 조치를 취하십시오.

통증에 대하여 담당 의료 

제공자와 상담하십시오

아편제를 복용하기 

전에 질문하십시오

진통제에 대한 지시 

사항을 따르십시오

• 특정 진통제를 복용할 경우 알코올이나 

항히스타민제와 벤조디아제핀과 같은 약을 함께 

복용하지 마십시오. 알코올과 다른 종류의 진통제 

혹은 다른 약을 함께 복용하는 것은 호흡 정지를 

야기시킬 수 있습니다.

• 의약품, 다른 약, 혹은 알코올에 중독되었으면 

담당 의료 제공자에게 알리십시오.

• 사용하지 않은 처방 진통제들을 폐기하십시오.

미식품의약국 (FDA)의 웹사이트나 담당 의료 

제공자에게 문의하여 사용하지 않은 약을 

폐기하는 가장 좋은 방법을 확인하십시오.

• 본인이나 사랑하는 사람들이 진통제 

중독으로 치료법을 찾는데 도움이 필요하면 

1-800-662-HELP (4357)로 전화하거나 

https://findtreatment.samhsa.gov/ 를 

방문하십시오

여성과 진통제 (KOREAN)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10106]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing in the National Register were received by the National Park 
Service before April 15, 1995. Pursuant to Sec. 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 
written comments concerning the significance of these properties under 
the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded to the 
National Register, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, 
D.C. 20013-7127. Written comments should be submitted by May 10, 1995.
Carol D. Shull,
Chief of Registration, National Register.

CALIFORNIA

Los Angeles County

Los Angeles Nurses' Club, 245 S. Lucas Ave., Los Angeles, 95000581

CONNECTICUT

Fairfield County

West End Congregation--Achavath Achim Synagogue (Historic Synagogues 
of Connecticut MPS), 725 Hancock Ave., Bridgeport, 95000574
Hartford County
    Beth Hamedrash Hagodol Synagogue (Historic Synagogues of 
Connecticut MPS), 370 Garden St., Hartford, 95000577
Chevry Lomday Mishnayes Synagogue (Historic Synagogues of 
Connecticut MPS), 148-150 Bedford St., Hartford, 95000575
Tephereth Israel Synagogue (Historic Synagogues of Connecticut MPS), 
76 Winter St., New Britain, 95000576

New Haven County

Beth Israel Synagogue (Historic Synagogues of Connecticut MPS), 232 
Orchard St., New Haven, 95000578

KANSAS

Chase County

Whitney Ranch Historic District, SE of Hymer off unnamed rd., Hymer 
vicinity, 95000589

Marion County

Island Field Ranch House, US 56/77 S of Lincolnville, Lincolnville 
vicinity, 95000579
Santa Fe Trail--Marion County Trail Segments (Santa Fe Trail MPS), 
3\1/2\ mi. S of FAS Hwy. 426 on FAS Hwy. 184, Durham vicinity, 
95000584

Morris County

Six Mile Creek Stage Station Historic District (Santa Fe Trail MPS), 
600 ft. E of FAS Hwy. 468, 4\1/4\ mi. S of jct. with US 56, Burdick 
vicinity, 95000585

Osage County

Hunt, Samuel, Grove (Santa Fe Trail MPS), KS 31 E of crossing of I-
335 (Kansas Tpk.), Burlingame Township, Burlingame vicinity, 
95000586

Rice County

Santa Fe Trail--Rice County Trail Segments (Santa Fe Trail MPS), 
Bushton Blacktop (FAS Hwy. 570), \3/4\ mi. N of US 56, Chase 
vicinity, 95000582
Station Little Arkansas (Santa Fe Trail MPS), 5 mi. S of US 56 on 
FAS Hwy. 443, \3/4\ mi. W on gravel rd., Windom vicinity, 95000583

MISSOURI

Buchanan County

Nelson--Pettis Farmsteads Historic District, 4401 Ajax Rd., 3412 
Pettis Rd., St. Joseph, 95000587

OHIO

Franklin County

Engine House No. 16, 260 N. Fourth St., Columbus, 95000580

Summit County

Jyrovat Farmstead (Agricultural Resources of the Cuyahoga Valley 
MPS), 696 Streetsboro Rd., Peninsula vicinity, 95000588

[FR Doc. 95-10106 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Albania DELEON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9748.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until June 24, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1270 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1270

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the Leaking 
           Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TRUST FUND 
              FINANCING RATE.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 4081(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to Leaking Underground Storage Tank 
Trust Fund financing rate) is amended by striking ``April 1, 2005'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2005''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 133 

To increase the maximum Pell Grant. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mr. KELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To increase the maximum Pell Grant. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pell Grant Increase 

5 Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM PELL GRANT INCREASE. 

7 Paragraph (2)(A) of section 401(b) of the Higher 

8 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(2)(A)) is 

9 amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(2)(A) The amount of the Federal Pell Grant for 

11 a student eligible under this part shall be $6,000 for aca12 demic years 2005–2006 through 2010–2011, less an 
2 

•HR 133 IH 

1 amount equal to the amount determined to be the expected 

2 family contribution with respect to that student for that 

3 year.’’. 

Æ
### fitVl. rfThe*/ /fl't J^i-h'Ct e>4 ^JlAh^Jrli^ S\/*h$i p/t, ^2 t?/^ //^ ^ ^^ ***#& 

### /**¥***&% f*£<*•<&.
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS 12th Court ofAppeals District DEC 29 2014 TYLER TEXAS CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK^JtKfX CtfiAij- o-f Affe*,/ Cms, a* 12-/v. Otist*c« T«*t C,*+ Cjh. 

### _^-y • ^ 007-//r*-/£-'*'' FILED IN COURTOFAPPEALS 12th Court ofAppeals CHstrict /j/flfoe Q^ -X^jjdch^. C28 2d» mm it***- -cT^ /5ry >^^ 

### fatKm* $U/ * v,ft 0{ H0? Ll^s
'' ht>le*, Cat/rnr^ Ai«/ d<}/ /lei /)*// ^) 

### Ai+nv ,+ fa m<f/^ 0j /irf>/;c4«+'j c/<*;»>. sjx« 12** Ct*\k of- Af#**( n*vi \iAnr/fcb^>, j^ 

### %&> (ft* Cf Arrr/i«\\ 5,c frf*^ m/A«Mrt»i 

## *IL^&L3l3*i fe fa ft, £*} TYLER TSXAJfeE

^S~oA fir/ /?fC6r*«^

### J[A,> /Utf(c fif ^(/J^ u;^ JQ/7J- ^ 

# all ncL/^' Uts+ ^ WhH m^ C3^ WO<^
_________________________________________ 

Order 

September 28, 2005 

128087 

128088 

SHIRLEY D. VAN SICKLE, 

and DENNIS VAN SICKLE, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v 

WILLIS B. ANDERSON, JR., D.O., 

and McPHERSON HOSPITAL, d/b/a 

TRINITY HEALTH MICHIGAN, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

ST. JOSEPH MERCY HEALTH 

SYSTEM, d/b/a TRINITY HEALTH

MICHIGAN, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

 SC: 128087, 128088 

 COA: 248351, 248447 

Livingston CC: 02-019152-NH 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 

2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are 

not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
Manuel Gomez LOPEZ, petitioner, v. Mike McDONALD, Warden, et al.

No. 12-8673.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Austin Alan RAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10138.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Julian CASTILLO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 12-7611.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York, Kings County-Criminal Term denied.
eo
ste
a
onk
att
=

Mids g ple Bilaig QalnY) Sota aici! dasaiol) 4a bt elie) a wee
ee
FDAN

|
= r
of
Liat

Ree
Li
rt *

tn mtr -

Ohe Baily ¢

Wednesday, erases 2009

SOUS Ge Agen AG es ay pill) Aghe ato) Ysa

<<

32) ga) cod Gerd) ALUMS Apitee OLDE (68 eldal) aus
aaa) 68 Anal

Sail) ob ual Ac og) gle eldel) audi

fot pel dy pil) i} tee al adi)

Getie (pile plan Jala & guage clog cof cladl) uli
GAY) Atedl) gyhtl Vy

Foodborne Outbreak due to

Reports show that there a statement fromthe cook Ren LS a.
are possibly 34 ill persons The cook admitted to folli
sickened by eating beans telang some shortcuts ump | S Q / IS | ray As as | badd
prepared at a local dunng the coolng process re) wer
festaurant, Among the 34 ofthe beans, which ledthe The : v
ill persons, 2 people are food to be, unsafe for that a . me : i Ly ‘| ”
hospitalzed including a 7 consumption rela da, 2 doll Asie vgect i aa
year old boy the

The cook is truly somy for beh

Interviews were attempted allthepanhehascaused ofa
jand we were able to secure exp)

—<—
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          80,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  351,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               459,852
<PP&E>                                          90,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 498,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,778
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   498,358
<SALES>                                        551,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               562,640
<CGS>                                          281,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  498,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               121,880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,763)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (66,763)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER SETTING FURTHER

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE RE MOTIONS

IN LIMINE

The Court has reviewed the précis and response from each side regarding proposed

motions in limine to be heard in advance of the final pretrial conference. We will have another

case management conference on JUNE 29 AT 8:00 A.M. to discuss this matter. Prior to the

conference, the Court will send out a list of items for the parties’ consideration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 663 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 1
Matthew KWONG, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 12-9066.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Sylvester KNIGHT, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8738.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
FDA is responsible for protecting public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security 

of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices. FDA also has 

the responsibility in maintaining the safety of our nation’s food supply (human and animal), 

cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.

The scope of FDA’s regulatory authority is very broad. FDA’s responsibilities are closely 

related to those of several other government agencies. It is often frustrating and confusing to 

determine the appropriate regulatory agency to contact. The following is a list of traditionallyrecognized product that the FDA has regulatory jurisdiction over - however, this is not a 

complete list.

bottled water

infant formula

food additives

dietary supplements

other foods (except some meat, 

poultry & egg products)

FOODS, INCLUDING:

over-the-counter drugs

prescription drugs (brand-name & generic)

DRUGS, INCLUDING:

What Does FDA 

Regulate?

A Guide for Health Professionals
For additional information, including more details on what FDA regulates,

visit https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-basics/what-does-fda-regulate.

For information on FDA’s Stakeholder Engagement, visit https://www.fda.gov/stakeholders.

Reviewed: June 1, 2020

BIOLOGICS, INCLUDING:

vaccines for humans

blood & blood products

tissue & tissue products

cellular & gene therapy products

dental devices

surgical implants & prosthetics

complex devices such as heart pacemakers

common items like tongue depressors & bedpans

MEDICAL DEVICES, INCLUDING:

PRODUCTS THAT EMIT 

RADIATION, INCLUDING:

sunlamps

laser products

x-ray equipment

microwave ovens

ultrasonic therapy equipment

TOBACCO PRODUCTS, INCLUDING:

cigars

cigarettes

e-cigarettes

smokeless tobacco

roll-your-own tobacco

hookah & pipe tobacco

COSMETICS, INCLUDING:

tattoos

perfumes

moisturizers

lipstick & fingernail polishes

color additives in makeup & personal care products

VETERINARY PRODUCTS, 

INCLUDING:

pet food

livestock feed

veterinary drugs & devices