1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING WAYMO’S REPLY ISO MOTION TO COMPEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING WAYMO 

LLC’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS 

MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION 

OF WITHHELD DOCUMENTS

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 443 Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2- Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING WAYMO’S REPLY ISO MOTION TO COMPEL

WHEREAS, on May 1, 2017, Waymo LLC (“Waymo”) filed a Motion to Compel Production 

of Withheld Documents (Dkt. No. 321), Defendants filed an opposition on May 8, 2017 (Dkt. No. 

369), and the deadline for Waymo’s Reply is May 15, 2017;

WHEREAS, the hearing on Waymo’s Motion to Compel Production of Withheld Documents 

is scheduled for May 24, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.; 

WHEREAS, Defendants have made multiple document productions relevant to Waymo’s 

pending motion to compel after filing their opposition; 

WHEREAS, the Court provided guidance at the May 11, 2017, hearing that the parties may 

reach agreements on filing procedures and timing (see 5/11/17 Hr’g Tr. at 28:4-9);

WHEREAS, Waymo needs additional time to analyze Defendants’ recent document 

productions over this past weekend and today and incorporate such documents into its Reply as 

needed;

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows: Waymo shall have until May 16, 2017, at 

10:00 a.m. to file its Reply in Support of Its Motion to Compel Production of Withheld Documents. 

IT IS STIPULATED.

DATED: May 15, 2017

By /s/ Charles K. Verhoeven

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502)

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649)

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887)

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886)

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-4788

Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC

DATED: May 15, 2017 By

/s/ Arturo J. Gonzalez

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 443 Filed 05/15/17 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3- Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING WAYMO’S REPLY ISO MOTION TO COMPEL

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)

AGonzalez@mofo.com

ERIC A. TATE (CA SBN 178719)

ETate@mofo.com

425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-

2482

Telephone: 415.268.7000

Facsimile: 415.268.7522

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

KAREN L. DUNN (Pro Hac Vice)

kdunn@bsfllp.com

HAMISH P.M. HUME (Pro Hac Vice)

hhume@bsfllp.com

1401 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington DC 20005

Telephone: 202.237.2727

Facsimile: 202.237.6131

Attorneys for Defendants UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC and OTTOMOTTO LLC

DATED: May 15, 2017 By /s/ Neel Chatterjee

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Indra Neel Chatterjee (SBN 173985)

nchatterjee@goodwinlaw.com 

Goodwin Procter LLP

135 Commonwealth Drive

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Tel: (650) 752-3100 

Fax: (650) 853-1038 

Brett M. Schuman (SBN 189247)

bschuman@goodwinlaw.com

Shane Brun (SBN 179079)

sbrun@goodwinlaw.com

Rachel M. Walsh (SBN 250568)

rwalsh@goodwinlaw.com

Goodwin Procter LLP

Three Embarcadero Center

San Francisco, California 94111

Tel.: +1 415 733 6000

Fax.: +1 415 677 9041

Attorneys for Defendant OTTO TRUCKING LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 443 Filed 05/15/17 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-4- Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

STIPULATION REGARDING WAYMO’S REPLY ISO MOTION TO COMPEL

/s/ Charles K. Verhoeven

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the 

filing of this document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document. 

 

 Charles K. Verhoeven

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 443 Filed 05/15/17 Page 4 of 4