21806 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 1995 / Notices

[Docket No. ER95–469–001, et al.]

Florida Power Corp., et al.; Electric

Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

April 26, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Florida Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–469–001]

Take notice that Florida Power

Corporation, on April 21, 1995,

tendered for filing a compliance filing

required by the Commission’s order of

March 21, 1995 in this docket. The

filing consists of a letter agreement

executed by the Company and the

parties to the Pre-Filing Settlement

Agreement in this docket and

Attachments A through E to that letter

agreement. The letter agreement with

Attachments A through E constitute an

amendment to the Settlement

Agreement and is subject to all of the

conditions contained in Article V

thereof.

Comment date: May 11, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

2. AIG Trading Corporation

[Docket No. ER94–1691–004]

Take notice that on April 6, 1995, AIG

Trading Corporation tendered for filing

its quarterly report in the abovereferenced docket, reporting no

purchases or sales of electricity in the

quarter ending March 31, 1995.

3. Petroleum Source & Systems Group,

Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–266–001]

Take notice that on April 7, 1995,

Petroleum Source & Systems Group, Inc.

tendered for filing its quarterly report in

the above-referenced docket, reporting

no purchases or sales of electricity in

the quarter ending March 31, 1995.

4. Rochester Gas and Electric

Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–904–000]

Take notice that on April 13, 1995,

Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation

(RG&E) tendered for filing a letter

terminating the Amended Agreement

between RG&E and Green Mountain

Power Corporation regarding the sale of

power from May 1, 1988 through

October 31, 1997.

Comment date: May 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

5. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–905–000]

Take notice that on April 14, 1995,

Entergy Services, Inc. (ESI), acting as

agent for Arkansas Power & Light

Company (AP&L), tendered for filing the

Twenty-Third Amendment to the Power

Coordination, Interchange and

Transmission Service Agreement

between AP&L and Arkansas Electric

Cooperative Corporation (AECC) which

provides for the addition or

modification of Points of Delivery

thereunder. To the extent necessary,

Entergy Services requests a waiver of

the notice requirements of the Federal

Power act and the Commission’s

Regulations.

Comment date: May 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

6. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER95–906–000]

Take notice that on April 14, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company

tendered for filing a supplemental

agreement, associated procedure, and

letter agreement to the 1990 Integrated

Operations Agreement with the City of

Riverside (Riverside), Commission Rate

Schedule No. 250.

The supplemental agreement,

procedure and letter agreement establish

the terms and conditions for the

integration of Replacement Capacity

Resources purchased by Riverside under

the Conformed Western Systems Power

Pool Agreement. Edison is requesting

waiver of the Commission’s 60 day

notice requirements and is requesting an

effective date of April 15, 1995.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: May 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

7. Southern California Edison

[Docket No. ER95–907–000]

Take notice that on April 14, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company

tendered for filing letter agreements

(Agreements) between Edison and the

City of Riverside (Riverside) as an initial

rate schedule. Pursuant to the terms of

the Letter Agreements, Edison is also

submitting revisions to Rate Schedules

FERC Nos. 17, 129, 245, and 250.

The Letter Agreements set forth the

terms and conditions under which

Edison shall construct, own and

maintain that portion of the Seventh

Line, including the required substation

and telecommunications facilities,

between the 66 Kv bus at Vista

Substation and the Riverside City Limits

for operation by June 1, 1995. Edison

seeks waiver of the 60 day prior notice

requirements and requests the

Commission to assign an effective date

of June 1, 1995.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: May 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

8. Southern California Edison Company

[Docket No. ER95–908–000]

Take notice that on April 14, 1995,

Southern California Edison Company

tendered for filing a supplemental

agreement, associated procedure, and

letter agreement to the 1990 Integrated

Operations Agreement with the City of

Colton (Colton), Commission Rate

Schedule No. 249.

The supplemental agreement,

procedure and letter agreement establish

the terms and conditions for the

integration of Replacement Capacity

Resources purchased by Colton under

the Conformed Western Systems Power

Pool Agreement. Edison is requesting

waiver of the Commission’s 60 day

notice requirements and is requesting an

effective date of April 15, 1995.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: May 10, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

9. Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company, Pennsylvania Electric

Company

[Docket No. ER95–909–000]

Take notice that on April 14, 1995,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the

‘‘GPU Operating Companies’’), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and Engelhard Power Marketing,

Inc. (EPM), dated April 6, 1995. This

Service Agreement specifies that EPM

has agreed to the rates, terms and

conditions of the GPU Operating

Companies’ Operating Capacity and/or

Energy Sales Tariff (‘‘Sales Tariff’’)

designated as FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1. The Sales Tariff

was accepted by the Commission by

letter order issued on February 10, 1995

in Jersey Central Power & Light Co.,

Metropolitan Edison Co. and

Pennsylvania Electric Co., Docket No.

ER95–276–000 and allows GPU and

EPM to enter into separately scheduled

transactions under which the GPU
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 3, 1995 / Notices 21807

Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of April 6, 1995, for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: May 11, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

10. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–910–000]

Take notice that New England Power

Company, on April 14, 1995, tendered

for filing Amendments to FERC Electric

Tariff, Original Volume No. 5.

Comment date: May 11, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

11. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER95–911–000]

Take notice that New England Power

Company, on April 14, 1995, tendered

for filing a contract with the

Massachusetts Bay Transportation

Authority for construction, operation

and maintenance of distribution

facilities in Revere, Massachusetts.

Comment date: May 11, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (E)

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10911 Filed 5–2–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–329–000, et al.]

Northwest Pipeline Corp., et al.;

Natural Gas Certificate Filings

April 26, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Northwest Pipeline Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–329–000]

Take notice that on April 17, 1995,

Northwest Pipeline Corporation

(Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake

City, Utah 84108 filed a request with the

Commission in Docket No. CP95–329–

000 pursuant to Sections 157.205,

157.211 and 157.216(b) of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (NGA) for approval to

construct and operate modified

metering facilities, authorized in blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–

433–000, all as more fully set forth in

the request on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

Northwest proposes to construct and

operate modified metering facilities at

the Grace and East Raft River Meter

Stations. Northwest states that by

partially abandoning existing obsolete

meter facilities and appurtenances and

constructing and operating replacement

facilities, it would more efficiently

accommodate an existing firm

transportation agreement with

Intermountain Gas Company

(Intermountain) and Intermountain’s

affiliate, IGI Resources, Inc. (IGI

Resources). Northwest further states that

it intends to remove and retire the

existing obsolete 2-inch positive

displacement meter at the Grace Meter

Station. At the East Raft River Meter

Station, Northwest proposes to remove

and retire the existing obsolete 4-inch

positive displacement meter. The retired

meters from each meter station would

be scrapped and replaced with updated

facilities. The total estimated cost of

upgrading the Grace Meter Station

would be approximately $42,328, and

the total estimated cost of upgrading the

East Raft River Meter Station would be

approximately $38,143 which would

make a grand estimated total of $80,471.

Comment date: June 12, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (G)

at the end of this notice.

2. Texas Gas Transmission Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–341–000]

Take notice that on April 21, 1995,

Texas Gas Transmission Corporation

(Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street,

Owensboro, Kentucky, 42301, filed in

Docket No. CP95–341–000 an

application pursuant to Section 7(c) of

the Natural Gas Act for authorization to

construct, install and operate

approximately 0.93 mile of 8-inch

pipeline paralleling the existing 6-inch

portion of Texas Gas’s HerbertCannelton system located in Ohio and

Hancock Counties, Kentucky, all as

more fully set forth in the application

on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

Texas Gas states it is requesting

authority to construct, install and

operate approximately 0.93 mile of 8-

inch pipeline paralleling the existing 6-

inch portion of Texas Gas’s HerbertCannelton pipeline system. The cost

associated with such facilities is

approximately $413,000. Texas Gas

proposes to have the facilities

constructed and in service by November

1, 1995.

Texas Gas states that it is proposing

the additional 0.93 mile of pipeline, as

a result of the request by one of Texas

Gas’s existing customers located in Zone

3 and served off of the HerbertCannelton system, Ohio Valley Gas

Corporation (Ohio Valley), for 500

MMBtu per day of firm transportation

service under Texas Gas’s FT Rate

Schedule, effective November 1, 1995.

Texas Gas states that such firm service

is needed by Ohio Valley in order to

accommodate additional residential and

industrial growth on its system. A

portion of the proposed loop is

necessary, according to Texas Gas, to

accommodate these firm transportation

volumes for Ohio Valley.

Texas Gas also explains that the 0.93

mile of pipeline will serve to loop the

existing 6-inch portion of the HerbertCannelton system providing added

security for that portion of the system

and those customers served off the

Herbert-Cannelton system.

Comment date: May 17, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph (F)

at the end of this notice.

3. Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation, National Fuel Gas Supply

Corporation

[Docket No. CP95–343–000]

Take notice that on April 21, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

S.E., Charleston, West Virginia, 25314,

and National Fuel Gas Supply

Corporation (National Fuel), 10

Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York

14203, filed in Docket No. CP95–343–

000 a joint application pursuant to

Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for

permission and approval to abandon

certain exchange services between

Columbia and National Fuel, all as more

fully set forth in the application on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.