Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 87 / Friday, May 5, 1995 / Proposed Rules 22335

40 CFR Part 52

[UT11–1–6726b, UT12–1–6727b and UT13–

1–6746b; FRL–5184–6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans; Utah;

New Source Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: In this document, the EPA is

proposing approval of revisions to the

State Implementation Plan (SIP)

pertaining to the State of Utah’s new

source review (NSR) regulations, which

were submitted by the Governor of Utah

on November 12, 1993 and June 27,

1994. EPA is also proposing approval of

revisions to the State’s definition of

volatile organic compounds, which was

submitted by the Governor of Utah on

May 20, 1994. In the final rules section

of this Federal Register, the EPA is

approving the State’s SIP submittal as a

direct final rule without prior proposal

because the Agency views this submittal

as noncontroversial and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for the approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this rule. If the EPA

receives adverse comments, then the

direct final rule will be withdrawn and

all public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this notice. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed

action must be received in writing by

June 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be addressed to Vicki Stamper, 8ART–

AP, at the EPA Regional Office listed

below. Copies of the documents relevant

to this proposed rule are available for

public inspection during normal

business hours at the following

locations: Air Programs Branch,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region VIII, 999 18th Street, suite 500,

Denver, Colorado 80202–2466; and

Division of Air Quality, Utah

Department of Environmental Quality,

PO Box 144820, 150 North 1950 West,

Salt Lake City, Utah 84114–4820.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicki Stamper, 8ART–AP,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region VIII, 999 18th Street, suite 500,

Denver, Colorado 80202–2466, (303)

293–1765.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the

information provided in the direct final

rule of the same title which is located

in the rules section of this Federal

Register.

Dated: March 24, 1995.

Robert L. Duprey,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–10822 Filed 5–4–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[NC–63–1–6394b; FRL–5189–4]

Clean Air Act Approval and

Promulgation of Emission Statement

Implementation Plan for North Carolina

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

the State implementation plan (SIP)

revision submitted by the State of North

Carolina for the purpose of establishing

an emission statement program. In the

final rules section of this Federal

Register, the EPA is approving the

State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rational

for the approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to that direct final

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this document. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

DATES: To be considered, comments

must be received by June 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should

be addressed to: Joey LeVasseur,

Regulatory Planning and Development

Section, Air Programs Branch, Air,

Pesticides & Toxics Management

Division, Region 4 Environmental

Protection Agency, 345 Courtland

Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365.

Copies of the material submitted by

the State of Florida may be examined

during normal business hours at the

following locations:

Air and Radiation Docket and

Information Center (Air Docket 6102),

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M Street, SW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4 Air Programs Branch, 345

Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta,

Georgia 30365.

Air Resources Management Division,

Florida Department of Environmental

Protection, Twin Towers Office

Building, 2600 Blair Stone Road,

Tallahassee, Florida 32399–2400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joey

LeVasseur, Regulatory Planning and

Development Section, Air Programs

Branch, Air, Pesticides & Toxics

Management Division, Region 4

Environmental Protection Agency, 345

Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia

30365. The telephone number is 404/

347–3555 ext. 4215. Reference file

NC70–2–6861.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule which is published in the

rules section of this Federal Register.

Dated: March 28, 1995.

Patrick M. Tobin,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–10824 Filed 5–4–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 52

[WA 32–1–6894b; FRL–5192–2]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plans: Washington

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve

the State of Washington’s contingency

measure plan as a revision to

Washington’s State Implementation

Plan (SIP) for carbon monoxide (CO).

The SIP revision was submitted by the

State to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air

Act requirements for the Puget Sound

Carbon Monoxide Nonattainment Area.

In the final rules section of this Federal

Register, the EPA is approving the

State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for the approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to this proposed

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this rule. If the EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this document.