alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.6

COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

BANCTEC, INC.

DISCOVER CARD MASTER TRUST I

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of BancTec, Inc. (BancTec), pursuant to Services Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2008 (as amended, restated, supplement or
otherwise modified as of the date hereof, the Services Agreement) by and between DB Servicing Corporation (assignee of DFS Services LLC) and BancTec, Inc., hereby certifies that:



| | (a) | a review of the activities of BancTec, during the period from December 1, 2010 to November 30, 2011, and of its performance under the Services Agreement was
made under my supervision; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, BancTec has fulfilled all its obligations in all material respects under the Services Agreement throughout the period
from December 1, 2010 to November 30, 2011.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed
this certificate this 21st day of February, 2012.



| | By: | /s/ Maria L.
Allen
| | --- | ------------------

Name: Maria L. Allen

Title: Sr. Vice President and

President, Americas
Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 112   Filed 06/10/19   Page 1 of 7

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 112   Filed 06/10/19   Page 2 of 7

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 112   Filed 06/10/19   Page 3 of 7

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 112   Filed 06/10/19   Page 4 of 7

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 112   Filed 06/10/19   Page 5 of 7

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 112   Filed 06/10/19   Page 6 of 7

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 112   Filed 06/10/19   Page 7 of 7
Keenan R. STACKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3062

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 23, 2019

Kennan R. Stacks, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Following a jury trial Appellant was convicted of first degree murder and attempted first degree murder. He was sentenced to life in prison for the murder and a consecutive 75 year sentence for the attempted murder. We affirmed his convictions and sentences on direct appeal in *Stacks v. State* , 177 So. 3d 255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Appellant now challenges the trial court's denial of postconviction relief on the sixteen grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel alleged in Appellant's amended motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The State responded to five of the claims, as directed by the trial court. The trial court's detailed order and attachments, including the established law the court relied upon, conclusively demonstrated that Appellant is not entitled to relief on any of the grounds alleged. Therefore, the trial court's order is AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Salame M. AMR, petitioner, v. Eddie N. MOORE, Jr., et al.

No. 12-7424.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10113]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs
[OJP (NIJ) No. 1049]
RIN 1121-ZA12


National Institute of Justice; Solicitation for an Impact 
Evaluation of Operation Weed and Seed

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 
National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Announcement of the availability of the solicitation for an 
impact evaluation of operation weed and seed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESSES: National Institute of Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20531.

DATES: The deadline for receipt of proposals is close of business on 
June 30, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurie Bright, National Institute of Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following supplementary information is 
provided:

Authority

    This action is authorized under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968, Secs. 201-03, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3721-23 
(1988).

Background

    The National Institute of Justice is soliciting proposals for an 
impact evaluation of Operation Weed and Seed. Interested organizations 
should call the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) at 
1-800-851-3420 to obtain a copy of the ``Solicitation for an Impact 
Evaluation of Operation Weed and Seed'' (refer to document No. 
SL000089). The solicitation is available electronically via the NCJRS 
Bulletin Board, which can be accessed via Internet. Telnet to 
ncjrsbbs.aspensys.com, or gopher to ncjrs.aspensys.com 71. Those 
without Internet access can dial the NCJRS Bulletin Board via modem: 
dial 301-738-8895. Set modem at 9600 baud, 8-N-1.
Jeremy Travis,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 95-10113 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-M
Christine TOLLENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4886

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# L_2018276EN.01000901.xml

| 7.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/9

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2018/1655

of 6 November 2018

amending Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1), 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 December 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 (1) establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 December 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 (1) establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC).

| (2) | A new financial reference amount for the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019 should be established. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A new financial reference amount for the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019 should be established.

| (3) | Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Amendment to Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382

In Article 16 of Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC during the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019 shall be EUR 1 365 816.

The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC for subsequent periods shall be decided by the Council.’.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 6 November 2018.

For the Council

The President

H. LÖGER

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 of 21 December 2016 establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC) and repealing Decision 2013/189/CFSP (OJ L 352, 23.12.2016, p. 60).

1

---
Samuel L. CONFECTIONER, petitioner, v. Jeffrey BEARD, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 12-9530.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-19 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-19 Filed 06/18/18 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-19 Filed 06/18/18 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-19 Filed 06/18/18 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-19 Filed 06/18/18 Page 5 of 5
TALAWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT, petitioner, v. Clifford LITTON.

No. 12-692.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MARCUS ETIENNE, ELIZABETH

GOBERT, CRAIG MARSHALL, and

MARIO ROBINSON 

Defendants. /

No. CR 17-00093 WHA

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

AND REQUIRING CRITIQUE OF

SCHEDULING ORDER

 The Court is in receipt of the parties’ stipulation to continue tomorrow’s hearing. The

stipulation is hereby GRANTED and the parties’ hearing is continued to DECEMBER 5, 2017, AT

2:00 P.M. Furthermore, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and in the interest of justice, time is

excluded from November 14, 2017 until December 5, 2017.

Nevertheless, the parties shall review the tentative scheduling order and submit any

comments or critiques by FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 17, AT NOON. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 13, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Douglas HERNANDEZ-MOREL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1713

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Opinion issued January 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00011-CV

———————————

IN RE EDWARD R. NEWSOME, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 3, 2014, relator Edward Roy Newsome filed a document in this 

Court which purports to be a petition for a writ of mandamus. The underlying 

lawsuit is Newsome v. St. Luke Hospital, No. 2005–06163 (234th Dist. Ct., Harris 

County, Tex., Sept. 14, 2005). Relator’s petition and motions do not identify the 

respondent or real party in interest. In addition, relator has neither paid the 

required filing fees, nor filed an affidavit of indigence that complies with the 
2

requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Relator has also failed to 

provide a record as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7.

A court of appeals has no general writ power over a person—other than a 

judge of a district or county court—unless issuance of the writ is necessary to 

enforce the jurisdiction of the court in a case properly before it. See Tex. Gov’t 

Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (West 2013); Silva v. Klevenhagen, 833 S.W.2d 746, 

747 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Because the petition 

does not identify the respondent, we have no jurisdiction over relator’s petition.

We dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. 

All outstanding motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**459 KA 11-01223**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRIAN L. PATTERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN X. O’BRIEN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joseph D. Valentino, J.), rendered April 8, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree and criminal contempt in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Same memorandum as in People v Patterson ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [May 1, 2015]).

Entered: May 1, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,267,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,267,147
<PP&E>                                      22,395,185
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,583,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,078,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          516,073
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,562,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,078,800
<SALES>                                     13,453,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,544,631
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  714,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,830,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,830,480
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129983 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129983 

 COA: 264567 

Kent CC: 87-041754-FC 

HAROLD STAFFNEY,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Robert Paul SAAD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10168.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
exv10w30



 



Exhibit 10.30


AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE

NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

LYLE HEIDEMAN AND SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.

NOVEMBER 13, 2001


          The undersigned parties hereby amend the EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE/NON-COMPETE
AGREEMENT dated November 13, 2001 (the “Agreement”) in the following
particulars:



	 	1.)	 	By adding the following sentence to the beginning of Section 1(a):
	 
	 	 	 	Executive agrees to discontinue his present job duties effective 11:59
PM CST on December 31, 2003. During the period of January 1, 2003
through March 31, 2004 Executive will be considered as actively
employed and continue to be paid his base salary, earn target annual
bonus, and be eligible for the 2004 annual stock option grant, less
legal deductions as an active employee. In accordance with the terms
of an involuntary termination for a reason other than Cause, death,
total and permanent disability, or voluntary retirement, and other
than a Change in Control Termination as described in this Section 1 of
the Agreement, commencing as of April 1, 2004 Executive will be
eligible for Severance Pay as provided under Section 1(a) of the
Agreement and placed on a leave of absence as provide under Section
1(b) of the Agreement and agree to retire from Sears at the end of his
leave of absence.
	 
	 	2.)	 	By adding the following subsection (g) to Section 1 of the Agreement:
	 
	 	 	 	In the event Executive does not survive for the duration of the Agreement, all
amounts due Executive under this Agreement shall be payable to Executive’s
estate or beneficiaries, as if Executive survived until March 31, 2006.
	 
	 	3.)	 	By replacing the first sentence in Section 1(b) with:
	 
	 	 	 	During the salary continuation period, Executive will be placed on a
leave of absence status and be entitled to all benefits (other than as
specified above) for which Executive was eligible to participate prior
to the end of active employment, with the exception of Long-Term
Disability and Flexible Spending Accounts.




 







 



Except as explicitly set forth herein, the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.





	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
	 

	 

	 

	/s/ Lyle G. Heidemann	 	By:	/s/ G. A. Lee
	 	 	 	 
	Lyle Heidemann	 	 
	 

	 

	 

	Dated
	11/06/03	 	Dated:	11/06/03
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 841 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 841

       Recognizing October 2022 as ``National Principals Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2022

 Ms. Smith (for herself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Hirono, Mr. 
 King, Mr. Braun, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Boozman) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Recognizing October 2022 as ``National Principals Month''.

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals, the National 
        Association of Elementary School Principals, and the American Federation 
        of School Administrators have declared October 2022 to be ``National 
        Principals Month'';
Whereas principals are educational visionaries, instructional and assessment 
        leaders, disciplinarians, community builders, budget analysts, 
        facilities managers, and administrators of legal and contractual 
        obligations;
Whereas principals work collaboratively with teachers and parents to develop and 
        implement clear missions, high curriculum standards, and performance 
        goals;
Whereas principals create school environments that facilitate great teaching and 
        learning and continuous school improvement;
Whereas principals demonstrated leadership and played important roles in meeting 
        the needs of students, families, and communities during the Coronavirus 
        Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic;
Whereas the vision, actions, and dedication of principals provide the mobilizing 
        force behind any school improvement effort; and
Whereas the celebration of National Principals Month would honor elementary 
        school, middle school, and high school principals and recognize the 
        importance of principals in ensuring that every child has access to a 
        high-quality education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes October 2022 as ``National Principals 
        Month'';
            (2) honors the contributions of principals in elementary 
        schools, middle schools, and high schools in the United States; 
        and
            (3) supports the goals and ideals of National Principals 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 839 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 839

  Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2022

    Mr. Young (for himself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Braun, and Mr. Warnock) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month.

Whereas stomach cancer, also known as gastric cancer, is one of the most 
        difficult cancers to detect in the early stages of the disease, which 
        contributes to high mortality rates;
Whereas stomach cancer occurs when cancer cells develop in the lining of the 
        stomach;
Whereas stomach cancer is the fifth most common type of cancer worldwide;
Whereas, in 2022, an estimated--

    (1) 26,380 cases of stomach cancer will be diagnosed in the United 
States; and

    (2) 11,090 individuals in the United States will die from stomach 
cancer;

Whereas the estimated 5-year survival rate for stomach cancer is only 32.4 
        percent, and when diagnosed at a late, or distant, stage, the 5-year 
        survival rate is just 6 percent;
Whereas, in the United States, stomach cancer is more prevalent among racial and 
        ethnic minorities;
Whereas initial diagnosis of stomach cancer is often delayed because up to 80 
        percent of patients are asymptomatic during early stages;
Whereas increased awareness of, and education about, stomach cancer among 
        patients and health care providers could improve timely recognition of 
        stomach cancer symptoms;
Whereas more research into early diagnosis, screening, and treatment for stomach 
        cancer is needed; and
Whereas November 2022 is an appropriate month to observe Stomach Cancer 
        Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month;
            (2) supports efforts to increase awareness of, and 
        education about, stomach cancer among the general public of the 
        United States;
            (3) recognizes the need for additional research into early 
        diagnosis, screening, and treatment for stomach cancer; and
            (4) encourages States, territories, and localities of the 
        United States to support the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```