alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Después de 24 horas, toda- vía los recipientes tapados 

y colocados uno encima 

del otro se encontraban a 

78 ̊F (25.5 ̊F).

La importancia de enfriar los alimentos de forma apropiada.

Después de 24 horas, todavía los recipientes tapados 

y colocados uno encima 

del otro se encontraban a 

78 ̊F (25.5 ̊F).

Nunca quise hacer que alguieAhora, nuestro restaurante enapropiadamente.Los métodos de enfriamiento Colocar los alimentos bajo refrecipientes llanos y baños de hSeparar los alimentos en recipy ponerlos bajo refrigeración. Usar equipo de enfriamiento rAgitar los alimentos en un recsobre un baño de hielo.Otros métodos efi caces.

Protege a todos.

Enfría los alimentos de forma apropiada.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18E0009. KENNETH JOHNSON, et al. v. LOWNDES COUNTYBOARD OF

EDUCATION, et al.

The Applicants have timely moved for an extension of time to file their

application for discretionary appeal. The motion is hereby GRANTED. See OCGA

§ 5-6-39 (a) (5); Court of Appeals Rule 31 (i). The Applicants shall file their

application by September 18, 2017.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 07, 2017

09/07/2017
MANAGEMENT'S
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING
CRITERIA





Pacific
Life Insurance Company (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB, excluding the criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d)(l)(iii),
(d)(2)(iii), (d)(2)(iv), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(3)(i), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii),
(d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(i), (d)(4)(ii), (d)(4)(iii), (d)(4)(vi), (d)(4)(vii),
(d)(4)(viii), (d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii),
(d)(4)(xiv) and (d)(4)(xv), which the Asserting Party has concluded are not
applicable to the activities it performs, with respect to the asset-backed
securities transactions covered by this report (such criteria, after giving
effect to the exclusions identified above, the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").
The transactions covered by this report include all asset-backed transactions
under the Securitized Commercial Mortgage Loans Platform (the "Platform"), as
listed in Appendix A.





The
Asserting Party has assessed the effectiveness of Pacific Life Insurance
Company's compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting
Period and has concluded that it has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007, with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.





Deloitte
& Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report for the Platform on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
set forth in this assertion.




Pacific
Life Insurance Company










/s/ Michael S.
      Robb


Michael S.
Robb


Executive
Vice President, Real Estate Division


February
15, 2008






/s/ Michelle
      Stickles
 Michelle
Stickles


Vice
President, Portfolio Management & Operations


February
15, 2008














PACIFIC
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY


700 Newport Center Drive,
Newport Beach, California 92660-6397  Tel (949) 219-3011








APPENDIX A











SECURITIZED
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS PLAFORM








Trust
      Name
            Loan
      NameJP
      Morgan Series 2006-LDP8
            Tyson’s
      GalleriaMorgan
      Stanley Series 2006-HQ 10
            Waterside
      MallJP
      Morgan Series 2006-FL1
            Marriott
      Eastside HotelML-CFC
      Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-8
            Peninsula
      Beverly Hills Hotel
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Peter H. BEER, et al.

No. 12-801.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Dai NGUYEN, petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 12-9764.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOMINIQUE WRIGHT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1615

[December 28, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline C. Shepherd, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502008CF004966BXXX-MB.

Dominique Wright, West Palm Beach, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6394

CHARLES JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-1502-CCB)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann

Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Jones’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Corcoran,

No. CA-97-1502-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Juan Febres CARRASCO, petitioner, v. CITY OF BRYAN, TEXAS.

No. 12M131.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Veridicom  International,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Bashir Jaffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



Date:  August 12, 2005                             By: /s/ Bashir Jaffer
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Bashir Jaffer
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
ADOPTIVE COUPLE, petitioners, v. BABY GIRL, a Minor Child Under the Age of Fourteen Years, et al.

No. 12-399.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Renewed motion of petitioners for leave to file the joint appendix under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Upon consideration of the motions for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and the motions for divided argument, the time is to be divided as follows: 20 minutes for petitioners, 10 minutes for respondent Guardian ad Litem, 20 minutes for respondent Birth Father, and 10 minutes for the Solicitor General.
Marquez CRENSHAW, petitioner, v. Harry STEWARD, Warden.

No. 12-8772.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Food and Drug Administration Office of the Commissioner (OC)/Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA)/

Office of Regulatory Management Operations (ORMO)

Office of Training, Education and Development (OTED) Organization Chart

OTED

Immediate Office (IO)

Division of Programmatic Training 

(DPT)

Programmatic Training 

Branch 1

Programmatic Training 

Branch 2

Division of Multi‐Program, Leadership & 

Management Training (DMPLMT)

Multi‐Program 

Leadership & 

Management Branch

Leadership & 

Management Mentoring 

Branch

Division of Instructional Systems & 

Technology (DIST)

Instructional Systems 

Branch

Learning Management 

Technology & 

Multimedia Branch

Division of Testing, Measurement, 

Certification, & Program Analysis

(DTMCPA)

Test Measurement & 

Analysis Branch

Certification 

Branch

Quality Records & 

Management Staff

Updated 04-04-2023
FDA 是美国卫生与公众服务部的一个机构,通过确保人药和兽药、疫苗和其他供人使用的生物制品以及医疗器械的安全性、有效性和保障性来保护公众的健康。该机构还负责全国的食品、化妆品、膳食补充

剂、电子辐射产品的安全性和有效性,并负责对烟草产品进行监管。

护肤产品安全

情况说明书

含有对苯二酚或汞成分的皮肤美白产品可能会对人体造成伤害。在美国,将这些产品作为非处方产品来销售

是非法的。请阅读护肤产品的标签,以识别其成分,并就您的治疗选项咨询您的医疗服务提供者。 

少数族裔健康和健康平等办公室

什么是皮肤美白产品? 

皮肤美白产品作为治疗肤色不均匀、粉刺、老年斑、雀斑和

皱纹的产品在市场上销售。公司可能会将皮肤美白产品描述

为皮肤漂白、褪色、色调均衡、闪亮或增白产品。

这些产品通常以霜剂、乳液、肥皂和粉末的形式在商店销

售,迎合西班牙裔/拉丁裔、亚洲裔、非洲裔或中东裔社区的

需求。 

什么是对苯二酚和汞? 

对苯二酚和汞是添加到皮肤美白产品中的成分,用以限制皮

肤黑色素的产生。黑色素是决定肤色的色素。当您将含有对

苯二酚或汞的护肤产品涂在皮肤上时,您的身体会吸收这些

成分。持续使用会让对苯二酚和汞在您的体内积聚,并可能

会造成伤害。

FDA 是否对含有对苯二酚或汞的皮肤美白产品的销售进行监

管? 

含有对苯二酚的皮肤美白产品并未获准在美国进行非处方销

售。您可以从您的医疗服务提供者那里获得含有对苯二酚的处

方护肤产品。皮肤美白产品中禁止使用汞。 

我如何知道哪些皮肤美白产品含有对苯二酚或汞? 

当您购买皮肤美白产品时,要查阅其产品标签,看看它是否含

有对苯二酚或汞。不要购买含有这些成分的非处方性皮肤美白

产品。请注意,汞在标签上可能被列为氯化亚汞、甘汞、水

银、汞或Hg 等等。 

在购买不需处方即可在柜台买到的美白产品时,我还应该考虑

什么? 

一些含有对苯二酚或汞的非法皮肤美白产品可能并没有在标签

上列出这些成分。要避免使用贴有手工标签、非英语标签或根

本没有标签的产品。这样的产品违反了 FDA 的规定,可能是

有害的。 

在哪里可以了解更多信息?

可通过浏览 www.fda.gov/SkinFacts来找到Get the 

Skin Facts! (获取关于护肤产品的情况说明书),了解护肤

产品安全方面的知识。

如果您在使用护肤产品时出现不良反应,请联系您的医疗服务

提供者,并将事件报告给FDA,可在这个网页

www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htm 进行报告,

也可打电话 

1-800-fda-1088 进行报告。 

关于健康公平性的详细信息,请浏览

www.fda.gov/healthequity.

FDA 已收到因使用对苯二酚而出现严重副作用的病例的报

告,包括皮疹、面部肿胀和永久性皮肤变色(褐黄病)。汞是

一种剧毒金属,会损害神经、消化系统和免疫系统,也会损

害肺、肾、皮肤和眼睛。
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

THOMAS LEGG, JR., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Cause No. 3:12-CV-844-JTM-CAN 

 ) 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING ) 

PHARMACY, INC. a/k/a NEW ) 

ENGLAND COMPOUNDING CENTER; ) 

AMERIDOSE, LLC; ALAUNUS ) 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY ) 

CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; ) 

and GREGORY CONIGLIARO, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

APPEARANCE BY ATTORNEY IN CIVIL CASE

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

Please enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Defendants, ALAUNUS 

PHARMACEUTICAL, LLC; BARRY CADDEN; LISA CADDEN; and GREGORY 

CONIGLIARO. 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court. 

LEWIS WAGNER LLP 

By: /s/ Janelle P. Kilies 

JANELLE P. KILIES, #30708-49 

 Attorneys for Defendants 

 

case 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN document 13 filed 01/09/13 page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on January 9, 2013 using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of this filing to the 

following: 

Douglas A. Mulvaney 

Stutsman & Mulvaney 

1300 Cassopolis Street 

P.O. Box 1337 

Elkhart, Indiana 46515 

/s/ Janelle P. Kilies 

 JANELLE P. KILIES 

LEWIS WAGNER, LLP 

501 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200 

Indianapolis, IN 46202 

Phone: (317) 237-0500 

FAX: (317) 630-2790 

jkilies@lewiswagner.com Q:\NECC\15 - Legg\Federal Court Action\appearance_JXK_Alaunus.docx

case 3:12-cv-00844-JTM-CAN document 13 filed 01/09/13 page 2 of 2
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                        |   |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      March 31, 2010 |        | /s/ Justin      N. Craig               |   |
|                      |   | Justin      N. Craig                        |   |
|                      |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and |   |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer                |   |

----
Executive Compensation Plan for the Six-Month Period Ending June 30, 2009



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Cascade Microtech, Inc. 
 2009 Executive Compensation Plan 
 for the Six-Month Period Ending June 30, 2009 
 Participants 
  

			
	 Geoff Wild
	  	Chief Executive Officer and President
	 Steven Sipowicz
	  	Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
	 Eric Strid
	  	Chief Technology Officer
	 Steve Harris
	  	Vice President, Engineering
	 Paul O’Mara
	  	Vice President, Sales and Customer Support
	 Mike Kondrat
	  	Vice President, Marketing
	 Anand Nambiar
	  	Vice President, Operations

 Performance Criteria 
 Bonuses for these participants are calculated on a percentage of their base salary based on attainment of planned levels of net income, operating income and goals and objectives. Determinations as to whether the performance targets have
been met are made on a six-month basis. 
 This table lists the portion of the total bonus payout that is based on the different performance measures, for
each executive: 
  

										
	 	  	Corporate Metrics	 
	 	  	
Net
income	 	 	
Operating
income	 	 	Individual
goals and
objectives	 
	 Chief Executive Officer
	  	30	%	 	40	%	 	30	%
	 Chief Financial Officer
	  	30	%	 	40	%	 	30	%
	 Chief Technology Officer
	  	—  	 	 	70	%	 	30	%
	 VP, Engineering
	  	—  	 	 	70	%	 	30	%
	 VP, Sales and Customer Support
	  	—  	 	 	70	%	 	30	%
	 VP, Marketing
	  	—  	 	 	70	%	 	30	%
	 VP, Operations
	  	—  	 	 	70	%	 	30	%

 The payout for the operating income and net income revenue portion will be: 
  

	 	•	 	 100% payout for achievement of 100% of the planned consolidated operating income or net income (“target”) 


  

	 	•	 	 Linear with zero payout for metric at 50% of target to 200% payout cap at 150% of target or higher 


  

	 	•	 	 Zero for operating income and net income below 50% of target 


 The payout for the goals and objectives portion will be determined by the goals and objectives score which takes into account relative importance of goals and other success criteria. A set of objectives has been formulated by consensus of
the executive management team at the beginning of the six month period.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 20934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10511]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Chapter I

[FRL-5199-3]


Notice of Open Meeting of the Negotiated Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee for Small Nonroad Engine Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: FACA committee meeting--negotiated rulemaking on small nonroad 
engine regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), EPA is giving notice of the next 
meeting of the Advisory Committee to negotiate a rule to reduce air 
emissions from small nonroad engines. Small nonroad engines are engines 
which are spark ignited gasoline engines less than 25 horsepower. The 
meeting is open to the public without advance registration. Agenda 
items for the meeting include reports from the task groups and 
discussions of the emissions standard and standard structure.

DATES: The committee will meet on May 22, 1995 from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 
p.m., and on May 23, 1995 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The location of the meeting will be the Courtyard by 
Marriott, 3205 Boardwalk, Ann Arbor, MI 48108; phone: (313) 995-5900.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Persons needing further information on the substantive matters of the 
rule should contact Lisa Snapp, National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions 
Laboratory, 2565 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, (313) 668-
4200. Persons needing further information on committee procedural 
matters should call Deborah Dalton, Consensus and Dispute Resolution 
Program, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-5495, or the Committee's facilitators, 
Lucy Moore or John Folk-Williams, Western Network, 616 Don Gaspar, 
Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87501, (505) 982-9805.

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Deborah Dalton,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 95-10511 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00191-CV

IN THE MATTER OF A.T. §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (323-110595-19)

August 29, 2019

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial court is 

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER CONTINUING

HEARING ON MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 

The hearing on plaintiff Waymo LLC’s motion for leave to file an amended list of

asserted trade secrets for trial, supplemental expert reports, and revised witness and exhibit lists

(Dkt. No. 2062), previously set for October 26 at 8:00 a.m. (see Dkt. No. 1954), is continued to

OCTOBER 26 AT 9:00 A.M. Both sides should be prepared to discuss the possibility of granting

leave to amend but severing Waymo’s proposed new claims for future discovery and trial while

we proceed on schedule with the trial date of December 4 for Waymo’s current list of asserted

trade secrets. Defendants’ response to Waymo’s motion should not presuppose that this is a

tentative ruling but should anticipate the foregoing scenario in addition to all other possibilities

for addressing Waymo’s proposed new claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Ronnie Wayne CRADDOCK and Sherrie Denise Hawkins, petitioners, v. BEAUFORT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 12-9700.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Southwest Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 9, 2017