alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jose Antonio LARIUS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10199.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11521]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development
[Docket No. N-95-1917; FR-3778-N-36]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 12, 1995.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact David Pollack, Department 
of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7254, 451 Seventh Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TDD number for the 
hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers 
are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 
1-800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
Jacquie M. Lawing,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 95-11521 Filed 5-11-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11084]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

April 28, 1995.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545-0963
Regulation ID Number: IA-146-81 Final
Type of Review: Extension
Title: Installment Method Reporting by Dealers in Personal Property; 
Change from Accrual to Installment Method of Reporting
Description: These regulations describe the procedure in which dealers 
in personal property may adopt or change to the installment method of 
accounting from another method of accounting.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Individuals or households
Estimated Number of Respondents: 50,000
Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 hour
Frequency of Response: Other (at the time of the election)
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 50,000 hours
Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management and 
Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11084 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONNELL ARTIS,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cr-00477-VC 

ORDER RE SEARCH WARRANTS

The government is ordered to provide in camera copies of the April 5, 2016 and April 7, 

2016 search warrant affidavits in unredacted form by 9:30 am on February 21, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2018

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge
ORDER – No. 17-cv-00898-LB

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

San Francisco Division 

JONATHAN WANG, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GOLF TAILOR, LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 17-cv-00898-LB 

ORDER REGARDING UNSERVED 

DEFENDANT 

The court previously raised with the parties the issue about service on Kingstar. (Dkt. Entry –

ECF No. 109.) The court asks the parties to consider whether they would stipulate to sever the 

claims against the non-appearing defendant. The claims would be assigned a new case number, 

and the case would remain assigned to the undersigned. Ultimately Golf Tailor will have to serve 

Kingstar, but the case also can move forward with the served parties. (This is a process used by the 

magistrate judges in situations such as this.) The court asks the parties to submit their joint 

position as soon as is practicable and in any event by January 4, 2018. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 22, 2017 

______________________________________ 

LAUREL BEELER 

United States Magistrate Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 746 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 746

         Designating August 2022 as ``National Catfish Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2022

Mr. Wicker (for himself, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Tuberville, 
   Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Shelby, Mr. 
Tillis, Mr. Warnock, and Mr. Cruz) submitted the following resolution; 
                   which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Designating August 2022 as ``National Catfish Month''.

Whereas the Catfish Institute recognizes August to be National Catfish Month;
Whereas the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas 
        recognize August to be National Catfish Month;
Whereas the States of Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and Tennessee embody the 
        Channel Catfish as their State Fish;
Whereas the farm-raised catfish industry in the United States employs nearly 
        10,000 people and contributes more than $4,000,000,000 to the economy of 
        the United States;
Whereas the United States has 67,640 surface water acres used for catfish 
        production in 2022, and catfish growers in the United States had 
        $421,161,000 in sales during 2021;
Whereas the average catfish farmer produces 5,000 pounds of catfish per acre;
Whereas 99 percent of all United States farm-raised catfish are grown in 
        Alabama, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, 
        Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas;
Whereas catfish is the largest farm-raised seafood product, by weight, in the 
        United States, representing more than 50 percent of the United States 
        aquaculture industry;
Whereas United States farm-raised catfish are consistently high quality and, 
        unlike ocean-caught fish, are available all year long;
Whereas United States farm-raised catfish are a sustainable and environmentally 
        friendly seafood product;
Whereas catfish is a lean fish and an excellent source of protein; and
Whereas catfish is a versatile fish in cuisine of the United States, with a 
        myriad of regional and national recipes to be enjoyed by all people of 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates August 2022 as ``National Catfish Month'';
            (2) recognizes the contributions of all workers, past and 
        present, that produce, process, and provide catfish for the 
        people of the United States; and
            (3) recognizes that purchasing United States farm-raised 
        catfish supports farmers, jobs, and the economy of the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
Ronnie A. FORD, Jr., DOC #H25867, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3185

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
JAMES TRISTAN GAY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4837

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. James B. Fensom , Judge

.

James Tristan Gay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney

General , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, OSTERHAUS

, and WINOKUR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Chauncey James GARDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4555

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
FDA Sends Call to Action to Infant Formula Industry 

Call to Action Description 

Evaluate and ensure that 

appropriate controls are 

implemented 

•	Evaluate all stages of production and in-process control (from 

receipt of raw materials and ingredients through distribution) 

•	Ensure that appropriate controls are implemented in accordance 

with 21 CFR 106.6(c) at every step 

Ensure full compliance with 

all relevant regulations 

•	Infant Formula requirements pertaining to Current Good 

Manufacturing Practice, Quality Control Procedures, Quality 

Factors, Records and Reports, and Notifications rule (21 CFR

part 106); and 

•	Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and 

Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food rule (21 CFR

part 117); 

Consider the concerns 

shared in this letter 

•	Control water in dry production areas 

•	Verify the effectiveness of controls through environmental

monitoring 

•	Implement appropriate corrective actions 

•	Implement effective supply-chain controls for biological hazards

•	Identify all relevant biological hazards 

Ensure adherence to the 

notification requirement

of an adulterated infant 

formula 

•	In accordance with 21 CFR 106.150, infant formula 

manufacturers are required to notify FDA of an adulterated or

misbranded infant formula any time product has left the facility. 

Additionally, we ask that firms voluntarily notify FDA any time a product sample is found to be

positive for Cronobacter spp. or Salmonella, even if the affected lot(s) have not been distributed.
Nicole DUBUCLET v. Skilar PIERRE

NO. 2019-CJ-0861

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 2019

Not considered. See Supreme Court Rule IX, § 6.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11400]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,755]


Philips Components, Mineral Wells Facility, a/k/a Philips 
Electronics North America, Mineral Wells, Texas; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance applicable to all workers of the 
subject firm in Mineral Wells, Texas. The notice was issued on March 
14, 1995 and published in the Federal Register on March 27, 1995 (60 FR 
15791).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings from the 
company show that the workers unemployment insurance (UI) taxes were 
paid under the name of Philips Electronics North America.
    Accordingly, the department is amending the certification to show 
the correct worker group.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,755 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Philips Components, Mineral Wells Facility also 
known as Philips Electronics North America, Mineral Wells, Texas who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
February 10, 1994 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 26th day of April, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-11400 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Wendell OLIVER and Kelsey Oliver, Appellants, v. SAILORMEN, INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 3D17-2555

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               RULE 13A-14(B) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Textron Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas J. Cullen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        Textron Financial Corporation

                                        /s/ Thomas J. Cullen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas J. Cullen
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 7, 2003

                                       34
Brandon GEORGE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 12-7409.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.
Johnny A. JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2019

Johnny A. James, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*252Johnny James appeals the denial of the rule 3.800(a) motion in which he argued that his 30-year habitual felony offender (HFO) sentence on Count II is illegal because the trial court never properly designated him as an HFO on that count.1 We affirm.

The claim raised in the current motion is procedurally barred because James unsuccessfully raised the same claim-and variations of it-on direct appeal2 and in three prior rule 3.800(a) cases that were affirmed on appeal.3*See**State v. McBride* , 848 So. 2d 287, 290 (Fla. 2003) ("Collateral estoppel ... precludes a defendant from rearguing in a successive rule 3.800 motion the same issue argued in a prior motion."). Additionally, because this claim was squarely addressed-and rejected-in this Court's opinion on direct appeal,4 we find this appeal to be frivolous and, pursuant to section 944.279(1), Florida Statutes, we direct the Clerk of this Court to send a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution within the Department of Corrections for potential disciplinary action against James. *See**Ponton v. Willis* , 172 So. 3d 574, 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (explaining that a *Spencer* order is not required before referring the inmate for disciplinary action based upon a frivolous filing). Finally, we caution James that further frivolous postconviction filings may result in an order barring him from proceeding pro se in this Court. *See**State v. Spencer* , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

1

It is unclear why this pro se motion was not rejected or stricken as unauthorized because, in the order that was affirmed by this Court in case number 1D12-4742, the trial court prohibited James from filing future pro se pleadings in the underlying criminal case (case no. 1998-270-CF) unless the pleading is signed by a member of The Florida Bar and directed the Columbia County Clerk of Court to reject all pro se pleadings filed by James in that case.

2

*James v. State* , 845 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

3

*James v. State* , Case No. 1D12-45, 90 So. 3d 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (table); *James v. State* , Case No. 1D09-2646, 22 So. 3d 73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (table); *James v. State* , Case No. 1D08-2526, 990 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (table).

4

*James* , 845 So. 2d at 239-40 ("Appellant now argues that, on resentencing for Count II, the trial court was bound to reduce the sentence to a guidelines sentence. Appellant's argument is premised upon the assertion that the HFO sentence imposed on Count II violates the double jeopardy prohibition and his due process rights because he was not initially subjected to HFO treatment on that count. We reject appellant's argument ....").
Order entered June 8 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 01351 - CV FELIX ECHENDU, Appellant

V. GUSTAVO HUERTA AND H UERTA'S BODY SHOP, Appellee s On Appeal fr om the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 14 - 05211 - E



### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s June 3, 2016 motion to extend time to file amended brief and ORDER the amended brief received by the Court on June 6, 2016 timely filed a s of the date of this order

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

AILEEN CENTENO, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 123 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary 

Relief or King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2


Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the annual report of Monarch Investment Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Philip Bloom, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
September 12, 2011

/s/ Philip BloomPhilip Bloom, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Justin Tavarse BARGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3709

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22414-22415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11096]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems; 
Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science [[Page 22415]] Foundation 
announces the following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems 
(#1190).
    Date and Time: May 25, 1995; 8:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Place: Xerox Conference Center, Leesburg, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. John R. Howell, Program Director, Thermal 
Transport and Thermal Processing, (703) 306-1371.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the NSF Faculty 
Early Career Development (CAREER) proposals as part of the selection 
process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11096 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Juny ABRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3797

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.