alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 14, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 31281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11485]



========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 1995 / 
Notices


[[Page 31281]]


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Yakima Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Yakima PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on June 28, 1995 
at the Yakima Public Schools Administration Office located at 104 N. 
Fourth Avenue, Yakima, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and 
continue until 4 p.m. This meeting will focus on areas of the 
President's Forest Plan implementation which agencies are finding most 
challenging to implement. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Any 
problems we are having in implementing the Plan, (2) update on 
Snoqualmie Pass Management Area planning, (3) update on legislation 
that may influence implementation of the Plan. All Yakima Province 
Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens 
are welcome to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated 
Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, P.O. Box 811, 
Wenatchee, Washington 98807, 509-662-4335.

    Dated: June 7, 1995.
Sonny J. O'Neal,
Forest Supervisor, Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 95-11485 Filed 6-13-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Josue CARIUS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1218

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Я почувствовала Мне следовало остаться На работе я брала чипсы голыми В ресторане семья отмечала 

недомогание среди ночи, но дома, но я почувствовала руками. четырехлетие сына по имени Хосе 

с утра должна была идти на себя лучше. Я не осознавала, Антонио.

работу. что микробы уже попали на 

мои руки из-за моей болезни.

Хосе Антонио обожал чипсы, которые Пока я болела дома, в Департамент здравоохранения Если бы я могла что-то вернуть, я ни за 

я подала. Через час я ушла домой, отовсюду стали поступать жалобы. После посещения что не пошла бы на работу в тот день. 

поскольку опять почувствовала себя нашего ресторана заболели более 20 человек. И было Я сама мать, и оттого постоянно думаю 

плохо. Я проболела еще два дня. выяснено, что всех заболевших обслуживала я. о малыше Хосе Антонио. Он пострадал 

из-за меня.

Меня зовут Мариэла, и моя история могла изменить вашу жизнь.

Оберегайте людей повсюду. Если 

вы больны - оставайтесь дома.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual
capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



SOUTHWEST BANK, TRUSTEE FOR SABINE ROYALTY
TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper
SVP, Royalty Trust Management


Date: November 7, 2017

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 150 Filed 10/23/20 Page 1 of 1
Antonio Sanchez FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. Norm ROBINSON, Warden.

No. 12-7849.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 126 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 126

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend Public Law 89-366 to allow for an adjustment in the number of 
    free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 126

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend Public Law 89-366 to allow for an adjustment in the number of 
    free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN NUMBER OF FREE ROAMING HORSES PERMITTED IN 
              CAPE LOOKOUT NATIONAL SEASHORE, NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--The first subsection (b) of section 5 of Public 
Law 89-366 (16 U.S.C. 459g-4) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``100 free roaming 
        horses'' and inserting ``not less than 110 free roaming horses, 
        with a target population of between 120 and 130 free roaming 
        horses,'';
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting the following new subparagraph:
            ``(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a plan to 
        maintain the viability of the herd; or''; and
            (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ``100'' and inserting 
        ``110''.
    (b) Repeal of Duplicate Subsection.--Section 5 of Public Law 89-366 
is further amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``(a)'' after ``(a)''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the second subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
James Loren VANDENBURG, petitioner, v. Domingo URIBE, Jr., Warden.

No. 12-8711.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Anthony FERRER, Petitioner, v. Rosanna FERRER, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 26, 2019

Anthony Ferrer, Orlando, pro se.

Nicholas A. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

*854This Court earlier dismissed Petitioner's Petition for Certiorari Review of Order stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case Number 2015-DR-008503-O. Because it appears that Petitioner's filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court. *See**State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

ORFINGER, COHEN, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
RIO TINTO PLC, et al., petitioners, v. Alexis Holyweek SAREI, et al.

No. 11-649.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Motion of Government of Australia, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of Professors of International Law, Foreign Relations Law and Federal Jurisdiction for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of National Foreign Trade Council, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.,* 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

REQUEST RE SELECTION 

OF SPECIAL MASTER

The Court requests that, prior to the hearing on May 3, both sides meet and confer and

select a mutually agreeable special master who, if needed, would be willing to clear their

calendar to work on this case and to have access to both sides’ secrets. The Court can imagine

any number of scenarios where having the assistance of such a special master would be

invaluable. If this case stays active in the district court, we will not wish to lose time waiting to

select a special master later.

Dated: April 4, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 143 Filed 04/04/17 Page 1 of 1
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135111 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135111 

 COA: 279100 

Oakland CC: 2005-206000-FC 

DAVID LEE CHAMBLESS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2008 

 Clerk
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of California

ERICKSON PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

3:17-cv-00127

TURNER + CUNNIFF, INC.

TURNER + CUNNIFF, INC.

c/o ANN CUNNIFF

c/o STEVE TURNER

433 W BRIAR PL APT 8B

CHICAGO IL 60657

KEVIN McCULLOCH

155 EAST 56TH STREET

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022

kevin@mccullochiplaw.com

Case 5:17-cv-00127-HRL Document 3 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

3:17-cv-00127

0.00

Case 5:17-cv-00127-HRL Document 3 Filed 01/11/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 

SOUTH BEND DIVISION 

SANDRA RHODES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING 

PHARMACY INC. aka NEW ENGLAND 

COMPOUNDING CENTER, et al. 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN

JUDGE JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to L.R. 6.1., Defendant Ameridose, LLC (“Defendant”), by counsel, hereby 

move this Court for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up; to and including 

March 25, 2013. Defendant’s Answer is currently due February 22, 2013. Plaintiff’s counsel 

has been consulted and has no objection to the requested extension 

WHEREFORE, Defendant, by counsel, pray for an Order allowing Defendant up to and 

including March 25, 2013 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and for all other relief just and 

proper in the premises. 

case 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN document 22 filed 02/21/13 page 1 of 2
2 

013260.000009/1629065.1 

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Knight S. Anderson 

Knight S. Anderson (17216-53) 

Tucker Ellis LLP 

925 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1150 

Cleveland, OH 44115-1414 

Tel: 216.592.5000 

Fax: 216.592.5009 

E-mail: knight.anderson@tuckerellis.com 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

on February 21, 2013 using the ECF system that sent notification of this filing to all ECFregistered counsel of record via e-mail generated by the Court’s ECF system. 

 /s/Knight S. Anderson 

Attorney for Defendant Ameridose, LLC 

case 3:12-cv-00841-JVB-CAN document 22 filed 02/21/13 page 2 of 2
George ARLINE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-1107.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Нарушения сна

Отдел женского здоровья при FDA

www.fda.gov/womens

Основные факты о сне

Большинству взрослых необходимо 7-8 часов 

сна каждую ночь. Не все люди получают 

необходимое им количество сна.

Иногда проблемы со сном могут возникать 

из-за: 

• Стресса

• Проблем со здоровьем и лекарств

• Продолжительного рабочего времени / 

сменной работы

• Света или шума

• Употребления алкоголя или приема пищи 

перед сном

Если у вас есть проблемы с засыпанием или 

продолжительным ночным сном, возможно, у 

вас наблюдается нарушение сна, именуемое 

бессонницей.

У некоторых людей имеются более серьезные 

нарушения сна. Проконсультируйтесь со 

своим врачом, если вы:

• Засыпаете днем

• Храпите или издаете задыхающиеся звуки 

во сне

• Испытываете странные ощущения в ногах 

или ощущение, что вам нужно пошевелить 

ногами

Лекарства, которые улучшат 

ваш сон

Имеются лекарства, которые могут помочь 

вам заснуть или полноценно спать. На 

некоторые снотворные требуется рецепт 

врача. Другие безрецептурные лекарства 

(OTC) отпускаются без рецепта.

Рецептурные

Рецептурные снотворные препараты 

эффективно действуют на многих людей, но 

могут вызывать серьезные побочные эффекты.

• Поговорите со своим врачом обо 

всех рисках и преимуществах приема 

рецептурных снотворных.

• Снотворные препараты, принимаемые от 

бессонницы, могут повлиять на управление 

автотранспортом утром после их 

употребления.

• Снотворные препараты могут вызывать 

редкие побочные эффекты, такие как: 

- Тяжелые аллергические реакции

- Сильный отек лица

- Отразиться на поведении при телефонных 

разговорах, еде, сексе или вождении 

автомобиля до полного вашего 

пробуждения

Безрецептурные (OTC)

Безрецептурные снотворные также обладают 

побочными эффектами. Для получения 

дополнительной информации о побочных 

эффектах безрецептурного снотворного 

ознакомьтесь с содержанием этикетки 

лекарственного препарата.
 Этот информационный бюллетень был разработан Отделом женского здоровья FDA.

Для ознакомления с другими материалами по охране женского здоровья посетите сайт

www.fda.gov/womens

2021

Нарушения сна

Рекомендации по улучшению сна

Внесение некоторых изменений в ваши привычки, связанные со сном, может помочь вам 

высыпаться.

• Ложитесь спать и вставайте каждый день в одно и то же время.

• Спите в темном и тихом помещении.

• Избегайте кофеина и никотина.

• Не употребляйте алкоголь перед сном.

• Занимайтесь чем-нибудь, чтобы расслабиться перед сном.

• Не делайте физических упражнений перед сном.

• Избегайте кратковременного дневного сна после 15:00.

• Не ешьте много перед сном.

Проконсультируйтесь со своим врачом, если вы испытываете 

нарушения сна почти каждую ночь в течение более 2 недель.

Нарушения сна (RUSSIAN)
Terrence SHANNON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9405.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Why It’s Important to Cool Food Properly Why It’s Important to Cool Food Properly 

My name is Carlos. I am a cook at a restaurant. I cook beans everyday. 

After cooking the beans, I place them in pans in the walk-in cooler. 

Each day, I reheat the beans before placing them on the steam table.One day, a little girl named Emily ordered beans and tacos. 

Later that day, Emily got very sicwith vomiting and diarrhea. She had be admitted to thhospital.

The health department said that the beans made our customers sick. The beans were not cooled quickly enough in the covered, stacked, deep pans.

I never meant to make anyonow cools properly.Proper cooling methods in Placing food in shallow, m under refrigeration Separating food into sma refrigeration Using rapid cooling equi Stirring the food in a con an ice water bath Other eff ective methods

Covered/stacked pans 

of food are still 78.F 

(25.5.C) after 24 hours.

Protect People Everywhere.

Cool Food Properly.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**CYNTHIA C. JONES AND DANIEL M. JONES,** 

**Petitioners**

**v.**

**MCNAUGHTON HOMES, AND**

**HAMPTON CONSTRUCTION**
**MANAGMENT, LIMITED D/B/A HAMPTON CONSTRUCTION, LIMITED,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 34 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 3rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter**
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00335-CR

EX PARTE MARK HANSON

From the 87th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 02-032-CR-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Mark Hanson has filed a notice of appeal from the denial of his Code of Criminal 

Procedure article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus application by the Court of Criminal 

Appeals.

The Court of Criminal Appeals and this Court have recognized that “the exclusive 

post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of 

habeas corpus pursuant to [Code of Criminal Procedure article] 11.07.” Olivo v. State, 918 

S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Ex 

parte Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.). Moreover, only 

the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus in 

felony cases. See Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 
Ex parte Hanson Page 2

910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding); Ater v. Eighth Court of 

Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding). We are therefore 

without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Notwithstanding that we are dismissing this appeal, Hanson may file a motion for 

rehearing with this Court within 15 days after this opinion and judgment are rendered if 

he believes this opinion and judgment are erroneously based on inaccurate information 

or documents. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Moreover, if Hanson desires to have the opinion 

and judgment of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that 

petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the 

day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing is 

overruled by this Court. See id. R. 68.2(a).

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 22, 2021

Do not publish

[CR25]
Anthony DILBOY, petitioner, v. NEW HAMPSHIRE.

No. 12-7910.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.
HILL, Senior Circuit Judge, specially concurring:

I concur because:

(1) In United States v. Burke, 113 F.3d 211, our court adopted the reasoning of the

Fourth Circuit (per J. Wilkins) in United States v. Pierce, 75 F.3d 173 which aligns

us with the approach taken by the district judge in the case, and

(2) the district court did, in sentencing, what ought to have been done for the good of the

public, the victims and the defendant.

Yet, I am less than satisfied that, in doing the right thing here, we are doing what we should

do. Florida law is “assimilated” into federal law in this case. The district judge found Florida law

inadequate to the task before him. He did what federal judges have done in these “assimilated”

cases with inadequate state law in the past – the state law is found to be in “. . . conflict with federal

sentencing policy,” so it is dis- assimilated, so to speak, and replaced. Perhaps the Congress meant

for this to be the law. See footnote 5 of our opinion. I hope so.