alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1236 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1236

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, as the ``Mayor Tony Armstrong 
                        Memorial Post Office''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1236

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, as the ``Mayor Tony Armstrong 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 750 4th 
Street in Sparks, Nevada, shall be known and designated as the ``Mayor 
Tony Armstrong Memorial Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor Tony Armstrong 
Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
为了维护众人生命健康,请不要带病工作。

上班前,问问自己:「我今天感觉舒服吗?」
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 584 

Congratulating Miss Emma Broyles of Alaska for being crowned Miss America 

2022. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2022 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. SULLIVAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Miss Emma Broyles of Alaska for being 

crowned Miss America 2022. 

Whereas Emma Broyles was born and raised in Anchorage, 

Alaska, and graduated from Service High School in 

2019; 

Whereas Miss Broyles, an honors student and a biomedical 

sciences major at Arizona State University, plans to attend medical school and become a dermatologist; 

Whereas Miss Broyles, who has excelled at a wide range of 

musical activities from an early age, is pursuing a minor 

in voice performance; 

Whereas Miss Broyles applied her exceptional talents in the 

Miss Alaska 2021 competition; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 584 IS 

Whereas Miss Broyles was crowned Miss Alaska on June 17, 

2021; 

Whereas Miss Broyles, as Miss Alaska, participated in the 

100th Anniversary Miss America Competition (referred 

to in this preamble as the ‘‘Competition’’) alongside 50 

outstanding young women from across the country; 

Whereas Miss Broyles was inspired by her older brother to 

choose ‘‘Building Community through the Special Olympics’’ as the theme of her social impact initiative; 

Whereas, during the talent segment of the Competition, Miss 

Broyles sang ‘‘Let Me Be Your Star’’ from the television 

show ‘‘Smash’’; 

Whereas, throughout the Competition, Miss Broyles spoke 

openly and courageously about her struggles with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and dermatillomania; 

Whereas Miss Broyles was crowned Miss America 2022 on 

December 16, 2021; 

Whereas Miss Broyles is the first Alaskan to be crowned Miss 

America in the 100-year history of the Competition; 

Whereas Miss Broyles is the first Korean-American to be 

crowned Miss America; and 

Whereas Alaskans take great pride in Miss Broyles’ victory: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates Miss Emma Broyles of Alaska 

3 for being crowned Miss America 2022; 

4 (2) celebrates historic achievement of Miss 

5 Broyles as the first Alaskan and first Korean-Amer6 ican to be crowned Miss America; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 584 IS 

1 (3) commends Miss Broyles for inspiring young 

2 people and serving as a positive role model for mil3 lions of individuals in the United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
FDAは米国保健社会福祉省の中の機関であり、人と動物用の医薬品、ワクチン、その他の人用生物学的製剤、医療機器の安全性、有効性、安全性を確認することにより、公衆衛生を守っています。また、国

内の食料供給、化粧品、栄養補助食品、電磁波を発する製品の安全・安心の確保、タバコ製品の規制も行っています。

スキンケア製品の安全性

ファクト・シート

ハイドロキノンや水銀の成分を含む美白化粧品は、害を及ぼす可能性があります。これらの製品の処方箋

無しでの店頭販売は、米国では違法です。スキンケア製品のラベルを読んで成分を確認し、治療法につい

ては専門医師に相談してください。

少数民族の健康および健康公平性オフィス 

美白化粧品とは、どういうものでしょうか? 

美白化粧品は肌の色むら、ニキビ、シミ、そばかす、シワ

などの治療薬として販売されています。

メーカーは美白製品を肌の漂白、退色を防ぐ、色を均一に

する、明るくする、美白目的の製品などと表現することが

あります。

これらの製品はクリーム、ローション、石鹸、パウダーな

どの形で、ヒスパニック/ラテン系、アジア系、アフリカ

系、中東系のコミュニティ向けのショップで多く販売され

ています。 

ハイドロキノンと水銀とは、どういうものですか? 

ハイドロキノンや水銀は美白化粧品に配合される成分で、

肌のメラニン生成を抑える働きがあります。メラニンは、

肌の色を構成する色素です。ハイドロキノンや水銀を含む

スキンケア製品を肌に塗ると、これらの成分が体内に吸収

されます。使用を続けると、ハイドロキノンと水銀が体内

FDAはハイドロキノンや水銀を使用した美白化粧品の販売

を、規制していますか? 

ハイドロキノンを含む美白化粧品は、処方箋無しでの店頭販

売が許可されていません。ただし、医療機関でハイドロキノ

ンを含む皮膚用医薬品を処方してもらうことは、可能です。

水銀を使用した美白化粧品は、禁止されています。 

ハイドロキノンや水銀が含まれている美白化粧品は、どのよ

うに見分ければよいのでしょうか? 

美白化粧品を購入する際は、ハイドロキノンや水銀が含まれ

ているかどうか、製品ラベルを確認してください。これらの

成分が配合された市販の美白化粧品は、購入しないでくださ

い。なお、水銀は塩化水銀、カロメ

ル、mercuric、mercurio、またはHgと記載されていること

があります。 

市販の美白化粧品を購入する際に、他に注意すべき点はあり

ますか?

ハイドロキノンや水銀を含む違法な美白化粧品の中には、ラ

ベルにこれらの成分が記載されていないものがあります。手

製のラベル、英語以外の言語で書かれたラベル、または全く

ラベルの無い製品は、避けてください。このような製品は

FDAの規制に違反しており、有害製品である可能性がありま

す。

もっと詳しく知りたい場合は?

スキンケア製品の安全性については、

www.fda.gov/SkinFacts. 、「Get the Skin Facts!」をご覧

ください。

スキンケア製品を使用して良くない反応が出た場合は、専門

医師にご相談ください。FDAのサイト www.fda.gov/

medwatch/report.htm または電話 1-800-FDA-1088. で報告

してください。

健康の公平性に関して、詳しくは 

www.fda.gov/healthequity. をご覧ください

美白化粧品

について知っておくべきこと

に蓄積され、害を及ぼす可能性があります。 

FDAはハイドロキノンの使用による発疹、顔の腫れ、恒久

的な皮膚の変色(オクロノシス)などの、深刻な副作用の

報告を受けています。水銀は神経系、消化器系、免疫系、

肺、腎臓、皮膚、目などに害を与える、毒性の強い金属で

す。
#### Johnny A. CASTRO, Sr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Robert L. AYERS, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 02-57125.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2004.*

Decided May 17, 2004.

*554Johnny A. Castro, Sr., Soledad, CA, pro se.

Terri A. Law, Esq., Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Stephanie A. Mitchell, Esq., AGCA— Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: BROWNING, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Johnny A. Castro, Sr., appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The standards of AEDPA, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), apply to his petition.

The California courts permissibly held that Petitioner did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. *See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (stating elements of claim of ineffective assistance). Even if his aunt had been called as a witness at trial, the outcome would not have been different. Petitioner was convicted of possession of contraband, and the evidence of possession was not in doubt; his aunt’s ownership of the contraband and Petitioner’s reason for possessing it were not relevant.

The California courts also permissibly held that Petitioner did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. The Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the aunt’s testimony would not have altered the sentencing judge’s decision was reasonable in view of the facts that counsel’s proffer was known to the sentencing judge, the aunt’s proffered testimony was consistent with Petitioner’s, and the sentencing judge did not question Petitioner’s explanation for why he possessed the contraband.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Eduard LORENZ, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Deputy Director of Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections; Director, General Services Department, Office of Risk Management, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-6011.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2004.

Decided May 18, 2004.

Eduard Lorenz, Appellant pro se.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

*900Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Eduard Lorenz appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Lorenz v. Johnson,*No. CA-03-626-AM (E.D. Va, filed Nov. 21, 2003; entered Nov. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Martin G. PLOTKIN, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 12-8930.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
William PETAWAY, petitioner, v. Joseph DINITTO, et al.

No. 12-9579.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Albert G. HILL, III, petitioner, v. William SCHILLING, et al.

No. 12M111.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Brian Darrell DAVIS, petitioner, v. Anita J. TRAMMELL, Warden.

No. 12-9214.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Остеопороз

Что такое остеопороз?

Остеопороз – это заболевание, при котором 

кости становятся очень слабыми и легко 

ломаются.

Кто в опасности?

Заболеть остеопорозом может любой 

человек, но женщины заболевают чаще, чем 

мужчины. Факторы, повышающие вероятность 

заболевания:

• Возраст старше 50 лет

• Курение

• Низкая масса тела

• Наличие родственников, у которых был 

остеопороз или переломы костей.

• Отсутствие необходимых физических 

упражнений

• Употребление алкоголя (более 3 порций в день)

• Долговременный прием определенных 

лекарств, например противосудорожных 

препаратов или стероидов.

Как узнать, есть ли у 

меня остеопороз?

Существуют тесты, в которых для измерения 

плотности костей используются рентгеновские 

лучи или звуковые волны. Эти тесты 

безболезненны. Спросите своего врача, нужно ли 

вам пройти обследование.

• Рентгенологические тесты, называемые DXAсканированием, исследуется состояние костей 

вашего позвоночника, бедра или запястья. При 

сканировании DXA используется очень низкое 

рентгеновское излучение.

• Более новые тесты на звуковые волны, 

называемые ультразвуком, проверяют вашу 

пятку.

Как это лечится?

Вылечить остеопороз невозможно. Однако вы 

можете что-то предпринять, чтобы замедлить его 

развитие. Поговорите со своим врачом, чтобы 

составить план по сохранению здоровых костей.

Отдел женского здоровья при FDA

www.fda.gov/womens
 Этот информационный бюллетень был разработан Отделом женского здоровья FDA.

Для ознакомления с другими материалами по охране женского здоровья посетите сайт: 

www.fda.gov/womens

2021

Рецептурные лекарстваs

Имеются рецептурные лекарства, которые вы 

можете принимать. Эти лекарства выпускаются в 

виде таблеток, пластырей или уколов (инъекций). 

Прежде чем прекратить прием лекарства, обсудите 

это со своим врачом, медсестрой или фармацевтом.

Бисфосфонаты – распространенный тип лекарств, 

используемых для замедления потери костной 

массы. Ваш врач может предложить вам другие 

лекарства.

• Поговорите со своим врачом о том, как долго вам 

следует принимать эти лекарства.

• Сообщите своему врачу, если у вас начнутся 

побочные эффекты, такие как новая боль в 

шейке бедра или в бедре. У некоторых лиц, 

принимающих эти лекарства, были переломы 

бедренных костей.

• Некоторые из этих лекарств могут вызвать 

раздражение в горле.

• Также могут произойти серьезные проблемы с 

челюстной костью.

Пищевые биодобавки

Пищевые биодобавки – это продукты, которые 

люди добавляют в свой рацион. К ним относятся 

витамины, порошки, энергетические батончики и 

травы.

Прежде чем принимать какие-либо пищевые 

биодобавки, посоветуйтесь со своим врачом. Они 

могут повлиять на другие лекарства и вызвать 

недомогание.

Изменение образа 

жизни

Чтобы снизить риск остеопороза вы можете

изменить свой образ жизни.

• Оставайтесь физически активными. Выполняйте 

упражнения с нагрузкой на ноги, например 

ходите.

• Не курите.

• Ограничьте употребление алкоголя.

• Обеспечьте достаточное количество кальция 

и витамина D в своем рационе. Ваш врач 

может порекомендовать принимать таблетки с 

кальцием и витаминами.

Остеопороз

Остеопороз (RUSSIAN)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10919]



[[Page 22051]]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology
[Docket No. 950405088-5088-01]
RIN 0693-AB40


Proposed Withdrawal of Federal Information Processing Standard 
(FIPS) 121, Videotex/Teletext Presentation Level Protocol Syntax (North 
American PLPS)

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NIST proposes to withdraw Federal Information Processing 
Standard (FIPS) 121, Videotex/Teletext Presentation Level Protocol 
Syntax (North American PLPS). This standard, which provides formats, 
rules and procedures for encoding alphanumeric text and pictorial 
information for videotex and teletext applications, adopts American 
National Standard X3.110-1983/Canadian Standard T500-1983. This 
standard is proposed for withdrawal because commercial products 
supported by this technology are no longer needed by the Federal 
government.
    The purpose of this notice is to solicit views from the public, 
manufacturers, and Federal, state, and local government users prior to 
submission of this proposed withdrawal to the Secretary of Commerce for 
review and approval.

DATES: Comments on this proposed revision must be received on or before 
August 2, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments concerning the proposed withdrawal should 
be sent to: Director, Computer Systems Laboratory, Attn: Proposed 
Withdrawal of FIPS 121, Technology Building, Room B-154, National 
Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
    Written comments received in response to this notice will be made 
part of the public record and will be made available for inspection and 
copying in the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, Room 
6020, Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th Street between Pennsylvania and 
Constitution Avenues, NW, Washington, DC 20230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Shirley Radack, National Institute 
of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, telephone (301) 
975-2833.

    Dated: April 27, 1995.
Samuel Kramer,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 95-10919 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-CN-M
#### Balwinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70546.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 23, 2004.

Madan Ahluwalia, Esq., Ahluwalia Law Office, San Mateo, CA, for Petitioner.

*465Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Balwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review an adverse credibility finding for substantial evidence, *Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000), and we reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Singh’s testimony that he was involved in only the religious aspects of the Sikh cause, not the political arm of the movement, was inconsistent with his declaration, which asserted that he was a “freedom fighter” and active in the Sikh cause for a separate Khalistan. This inconsistency goes to the heart of Singh’s claim because his activism formed the basis of his alleged arrests and persecution. *See Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1042-43 (9th Cir.2001).

Moreover, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Singh’s testimony regarding his third arrest did not establish persecution on account of an enumerated ground. *See Ghaly v. INS, 58*F.3d 1425, 1431 (9th Cir.1995).

Because Singh did not testify credibly, he did not establish eligibility for asylum. *See Mejia-Paiz v. INS,*111 F.3d 720, 723 (9th Cir.1997). It follows that he failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245,1250 (9th Cir.2003).

We do not consider Singh’s Convention Against Torture claim because he failed to exhaust this issue before the BIA. *See Arreaza-Cruz v. INS,*39 F.3d 909, 912 (9th Cir.1994).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Benefits Forms Information

The links to the Benefits Forms are listed below. You may fill them out electronically to print and bring to 

class, or you may pick-up blank copies in class on your start date. The Benefits presentation is held on Day 2 

of orientation where you will learn more about the benefits available at FDA, and turn in your completed 

forms. You have 60 days from your start date to make your benefits selections. To review the benefits 

available to you at FDA, please visit the OPM website.

https://www.opm.gov/healthcare-insurance/healthcare/

SF-2809 Health Benefits Election (FEHB)

https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf2809.pdf

SF-2823 Designation of Beneficiary Federal Employees’ Group 

Life Insurance Program (FEGLI)

 

https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf2823.pdf

SF-2817 Life Insurance Election (FEGLI)

https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf2817.pdf

SF-1152 Unpaid Compensation

https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf1152.pdf

SF-3102 Designation of Beneficiary Fed. Emp. Retire

System (FERS)

https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf3102.pdf

SF- 3109 Election of Coverage

https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf3109.pdf

Designation of Beneficiary, Unpaid Compensation of 

Deceased Civilian Employee

https://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf1152.pdf

Designation of Beneficiary, Thrift Savings Plans 

https://www.tsp.gov/PDF/formspubs/tsp-3.pdf
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22586-22587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11239]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Job Training Partnership Act and Targeted Jobs Tax Credit; Lower 
Living Standard Income Level; Correction

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of determination of lower living standard income level; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In notice document 95-10152, published at 60 FR 20283 (April 
25, 1995), in the table on page 20287, ``Table 4--SEVENTY PERCENT OF 
UPDATED 1995 LLSIL, BY FAMILY SIZE,'' the parentheses were omitted 
inadvertently. The corrected table is published below.
    We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of May, 1995.
Josephine Nieves,
Associate Assistant Secretary.

Appendix

                                                 BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[[Page 22587]]

[GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TN08MY95.000


[FR Doc. 95-11239 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-C
ASAP COPY AND PRINT, et al., petitioners, v. CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.

No. 12-962.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
Daniel Mike CHAVEZ, petitioner, v. OREGON.

No. 12-8679.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:12-CR-128(5) RM

)

JALEEN L. MCGEE )

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on March 20, 2013 [Doc. No. 101].

Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendation,

ACCEPTS defendant Jaleen McGee’s plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant

guilty of Count 1 the Indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c).

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: April 11, 2013 

 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. 

Judge

United States District Court
Michael Anthony CANDELA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5020

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7873

AMJAD ABBAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-01-250-2)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 11, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amjad Abbas, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Amjad Abbas appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Abbas v. INS, No. CA-01-250-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2001). We also

deny Abbas’ motions for bail, summary judgment, an injunction, and

declaratory relief. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Thad Lee YOUNG, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-8584.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.