Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices 20489

years, pursuant to Article IV, Section 4.1

of Rate Schedule FERC Nos. 264 and

183. Revised Exhibits C set forth

KEPCo’s Nominated Capacities for the

Points of Interconnection, pursuant to

Article IV, Section 4.1 of Rate Schedule

FERC Nos. 264 and 183. Revised

Exhibits D set forth KEPCo’s load

forecast and KEPCo’s Capacity

Resources intended to provide power

and energy to meet the forecast

requirement for ten years into the

future, pursuant to Article V, Section

5.1 of Rate Schedule FERC Nos. 264 and

183.

Copies of the filing were served upon

Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.

and the Kansas Corporation

Commission.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Louisville Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–879–000]

Take notice that on April 3, 1995,

Louisville Gas and Electric Company

tendered for filing a copy of a service

agreement between Louisville Gas and

Electric Company and Rainbow Energy

Marketing Corp. under Rate GSS.

Notice is also given that the service

agreement listed below and filed with

the Commission by Louisville Gas and

Electric Company is to be cancelled.

Date of

agreement

PurchaserCancellation date

Cancellation effective

3/28/95 Rainbow

Energy

Marketing

Corp.

3/28/95 3/28/95

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. FA89–28–005]

Take notice that on April 10, 1995,

Arkansas Power & Light Company

tendered for filing its refund report in

the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10217 Filed 4–25–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–311–000, et al.]

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company,

et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings

April 18, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co.

[Docket No. CP95–311–000]

Take notice that on April 7, 1995, East

Tennessee Natural Gas Company (East

Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston,

Texas 77252, filed in Docket No. CP95–

311–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to modify an

existing meter station in Roane County,

Tennessee under East Tennessee’s

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP82–412–000 pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

East Tennessee proposes to replace an

obsolete 6-inch orifice meter tube with

a 4-inch tube at the existing Harriman

meter station, #75–9032, at M.P. 3110–

1+8.40 (S.V. 3110B–101) on the 3100–1

Line. This tube replacement will allow

the meter station to better match actual

volumes being delivered. The

installation will not be extensive and

will cause minimal disturbance since

the replacement tube dimensionally fits

the existing piping arrangement. Total

capacity at the meter station will be

approximately equivalent to current

levels due to the reduced operating

condition of the existing 6-inch tube.

The meter station will still be owned,

operated and maintained by East

Tennessee. The estimated cost is

$39,100 to be funded from the

appropriate division’s minor capital

budget. The firm service customer at the

meter station is the City of Harriman, a

municipal utility company that supplies

residential customers. The tube

replacement won’t affect any shipper’s

contract entitlement.

After modification, East Tennessee

states there won’t be an increase in the

delivery quantity under the firm

agreement between it and the City of

Harriman; delivery of volumes through

the meter station won’t impact peak day

and annual deliveries; the proposed

activity isn’t prohibited by its existing

tariff, and there is sufficient capacity for

deliveries without detriment or

disadvantage to other customers.

Comment date: June 2, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

2. Florida Gas Transmission Co.

[Docket No. CP95–316–000]

Take notice that on April 11, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, Houston,

Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. CP95–

316–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.216 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and

157.216) for permission and approval to

abandon a small portion of an existing

lateral line. FGT makes such request,

under its blanket certificate issued in

Docket No. CP82–553–000 pursuant to

Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as

more fully set forth in the request that

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

FGT is proposing to abandon

approximately 6,500 feet of its 6-inch

East Mustang Island Lateral, at an

estimated cost of $117,476. Specifically,

FGT is proposing to abandon a 6,400

foot segment of line in place, 4,500 foot

of which is owned by a development

corporation, and 1,900 foot of which is

located under a road and the adjacent

right-of-way; the remaining 100 foot

segment which crosses a small boat

channel will be removed. It is stated

that the portion of line that FGT is

proposing to abandon is located in the

areas of East Mustang Island and Laguna

Madre, Nueces County, Texas. FGT

states that the abandonment is necessary

due to the encroachment of a residential

housing development. FGT further

states that it is proposing to abandon

that segment of line rather than

relocating it, because the relocation of

that segment of line would be costly and

would disturb an environmentally

sensitive area.

FGT also states that service to its two

customers located downstream of the

proposed abandonment, Gulfside

Industries, Ltd. and Valero Industrial
20490 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices

Gas, will continue under FGT’s SFTS

Rate Schedule and ITS–1 Rate Schedule,

respectively, because FGT has

constructed, upstream from the

proposed abandonment, a new receipt

point under the automatic authorization

of Section 157.208(a) pursuant to FGT’s

blanket certificate authorized in Docket

No. CP82–553–000.

Comment date: June 2, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

3. Columbia Gas Transmission

[Docket No. CP95–321–000]

Take notice that on April 12, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue,

S.E., Charleston, West Virginia 25314–

1599 and Columbia Gulf Transmission

Company (Columbia Gulf), of the same

address, filed in Docket No. CP95–321–

000 a joint application pursuant to

Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for

permission and approval to abandon

certain transportation services for

Brooklyn Union Gas Company

(Brooklyn Union) which were

authorized in Docket No. CP83–331–

000, all as more fully set forth in the

application on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

Columbia and Columbia Gulf propose

to abandon transportation services

under Rate Schedules X–117 and X–90,

respectively for the account of Brooklyn

Union. Columbia received, on an

interruptible basis, up to 10,000 Dth of

natural gas per day in Barbour,

Randolph and Tucker Counties, West

Virginia and made it available to

Columbia Gulf for redelivery to

Transcontinental Gas Pipeline

Corporation in Terrebonne Parish,

Louisiana for the account of Brooklyn

Union. Columbia and Columbia Gulf

state that the transportation agreement

has been terminated and no volumes

have flowed since November, 1984.

Comment date: May 9, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph F

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

F. Any person desiring to be heard or

to make any protest with reference to

said application should on or before the

comment date, file with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to

intervene or a protest in accordance

with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that a grant of the

certificate and/or permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for applicant to appear or

be represented at the hearing.

G. Any person or the Commission’s

staff may, within 45 days after issuance

of the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to

§ 157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10215 Filed 4–25–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL 5196–9]

Government-Owned Inventions:

Available for Licensing

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of availability of

inventions for licensing.

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below

are owned by the U.S. Government and

are available for licensing in the United

States in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207

and 37 CFR part 404. Pursuant to 37

CFR 404.7, the Government may grant

exclusive or partially exclusive licenses

on any of the inventions listed below

three months after the date of this

notice.

Copies of the listed patents and patent

applications are available from the

person indicated below. Requests for

copies must include the patent number

or patent application serial number. An

application for a license should include

the information set forth in 37 CFR

404.8, including the applicant’s plan for

development or marketing the

invention.

DATES: Exclusive licenses may be

granted for the inventions listed below

after July 26, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Ehrlich, Patent Attorney, Office of

General Counsel (2379), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Washington, D.C. 20460, Telephone

(202) 260–7510.

Patents

U.S. Patent No. 5,101,670: Automated

Proportional Integrated Sampling

System; issued April 7, 1992.

U.S. Patent No. 5,221,230: Paint

Spraying Booth with Split-Flow

Ventilation; issued June 22, 1993.

U.S. Patent No. 5,294,553: An

Improved Method for the Gravimetric

Determination of Oil and Grease; issued

March 15, 1994.

U.S. Patent No. 5,318,937:

Ruthenium-Containing Perovskite

Materials, Catalysts and Methods;

issued June 7, 1994.

U.S. Patent No. 5,322,052: Fireplace

with Destruction of Products of

Incomplete Combustion Enhanced by a

Gaseous-Fueled Pilot Burner; issued

June 21, 1994.

U.S. Patent No. 5,333,511: Portable

Controlled Air Sampler; issued August

2, 1994.

U.S. Patent No. 5,396,744: Electrically

Induced Radon Barriers; issued March

14, 1995.

U.S. Patent No. 5,411,707: Vacuum

Extractor Incorporating a Condenser

Column; issuing May 2, 1995.

Patent Applications

U.S. Patent Application No. 07/

793,881: Membrane Filter Agar Medium

for Detection of Total Coliforms and E.

Coli; filed November 18, 1991.