alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01980-00104/9012483.1 CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502) 

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887) 

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886) 

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF JOHN 

NEUKOM 

 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 15 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01980-00104/9012483.1

-2- CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that John Neukom, an attorney with the firm of Quinn Emanuel 

Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, and admitted to practice before this Court, hereby appears as an attorney of

record for Waymo LLC in the above-captioned matter. 

John Neukom (Cal. Bar No. 275887) 

johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

(415) 875-6600 

(415) 875-6700 facsimile 

DATED: March 1, 2017 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP 

By: /s/ John Neukom 

 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 

 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 

 David A. Perlson (Bar No. 209502) 

 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Melissa Baily (Bar No. 237649) 

 melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com 

 John Neukom (Bar No. 275887) 

 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 

 Jordan Jaffe (Bar No. 254886) 

 jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-4788 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 

Attorneys for WAYMO LLC 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 15 Filed 03/01/17 Page 2 of 2
# C_2018460EN.01000901.xml

| 21.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 460/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 460/9

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 17 December 2018

appointing three members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for Bulgaria, Croatia and Italy

(2018/C 460/08)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of nominees submitted to the Council by the Commission as regards the representatives of the employers' organisations,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2018 (2) and the corrigendum thereto (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2018 to 17 September 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2018 (2) and the corrigendum thereto (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2018 to 17 September 2021.

| (2) | The Commission submitted three nominees as regards the representatives of the employers' organisations, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission submitted three nominees as regards the representatives of the employers' organisations,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following three persons are hereby appointed members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period ending on 17 September 2021:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS:

| Bulgaria | Ms Daniela SIMIDCHIEVA |
| --- | --- |
| Croatia | Ms Jasminka MARTINOVIĆ |
| Italy | Mr Alfonso BALSAMO |

Bulgaria

Ms Daniela SIMIDCHIEVA

Croatia

Ms Jasminka MARTINOVIĆ

Italy

Mr Alfonso BALSAMO

Article 2

The Council shall appoint members who have not yet been nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. KÖSTINGER

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 16 July 2018 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2018/C 253/03) (OJ C 253, 19.7.2018, p. 9).

2

(3)  Corrigendum to Council Decision of 16 July 2018 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (OJ C 325, 14.9.2018, p. 20).

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11337]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Texas Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

[Docket No. RP95-265-000]
May 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 28, 1995, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets, with an effective date of June 1, 1995:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 10
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 11
First Revised Sheet No. 11A
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 12

    Texas Gas states that the revised tariff sheets are being filed 
pursuant to Section 33.3 of the General Terms and Conditions of Texas 
Gas's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, to recover ninety 
percent (90%) of its Gas Supply Realignment costs from its firm 
transportation customers and ten percent (10%) of its Gas Supply 
Realignment Costs from its IT customers. The GSR costs, including 
applicable interest, proposed to be recovered by Texas Gas's sixth GSR 
recovery filing total $2,137,196.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being 
mailed to Texas Gas's affected jurisdictional customers those appearing 
on the applicable service lists, and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before May 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11337 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
James U. NDURIBE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9274.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, RonHooper, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine RoyaltyTrust, for which Argent Trust Company acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under mysupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report myconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
By: /s/ Ron Hooper Ron Hooper SVP, Royalty Trust Services Argent Trust Company
Date: August 4, 2023 

 
**
#### Maria FRANCO-WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-74393, INS [ AXX-XXXXXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 15, 2004.*

Decided May 11, 2004.

Martin Resendez Guajardo, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

*534Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Elizabeth A. Kessler, Esq., Donald E. Keener, Esq., Michelle E. Gorden, Attorney, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before WALLACE, KOZINSKI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

1. We deny Franco-Williams’ petition for the reasons stated by the Board of Immigration Appeals in its disposition.

2. We deny Franco-Williams’ motion to supplement the administrative record, as the supplement is unnecessary to our decision.

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Order entered September 20, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00673-CV

BRIAN REAUX, Appellant

V.

GEORGE ABDOU, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-16-0989

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 18, 2017 motion for extension of time to file 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received by the Court September 8, 2017 

filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
O AO 120 (Rev. 2/99) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court Northern District California on the following U Patents or G Trademarks:

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

CV 17-00939 JCS 2/23/2017 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco CA 94102

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

WAYMO LLC UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC, ET AL

PATENT OR DATE OF PATENT HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1 ***see attach Complaint***

 2

 3 .

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3 .

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

SUSAN Y. SOONG Gina Agustine February 28, 2017

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Commissioner

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 13 Filed 02/28/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0042

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOHNATHAN ALBERT BERTSCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Julie Pesanti 

DeLong is granted an extension of time to and including May 24, 2022, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 25 2022

04/25/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0042
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11244]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Members of Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the names of the members of the FEMA Senior 
Executive Service Performance Review Board.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise R. Yachnik, Executive 
Coordinator, Office of Personnel and Equal Opportunity, 500 C Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20742, 202-646-3040.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The names of the members of the FEMA Senior 
Executive Service Performance Review Board established under 5 U.S.C. 
4314(c)(4) are :
    G. Clay Hollister, Robert P. Fletcher, John P. Carey, Michelle M. 
Burkett, Gordon D. Fullerton, Laurence W. Zensinger, John L. Matticks, 
Dennis E. Owens.

    Dated: May 2, 1995.
John P. Carey,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 95-11244 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-P
Miguel Angel GARIBAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9493.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Private ADR.” 

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

 

 Defendant(s) 

CASE No C 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following 

stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the 

following ADR process: 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

 Private ADR (specify process and provider) 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, 

unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 other requested deadline: 

 Date: 

Date: 

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: 

Date: 

 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct 

mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an 

early settlement conference with a Magistrate 

Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this 

form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR 

L.R. 3-5.

RON FRANKLIN DENNIS MALLY 4:17-cv-00789-HSG ■

■

February 1, 2019 November 15, 2018 /s/ K. Chike Odiwe November 9, 2018 /s/ Gregory M. Fox (Hybrid) X

 11/16/2018
Stacy Lamont BERRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10028.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 138 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 138

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
                   System Jekyll Island Unit GA-06P.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER 
              RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``GA-06P'', relating to the John 
H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System unit designated as Coastal 
Barrier Resources System Jekyll Island Unit GA-06P, that is included in 
the set of maps entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' and referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is hereby replaced by another map 
relating to the unit entitled ``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
Resources System Jekyll Island Unit GA-06P'' and dated July 10, 2006.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with the provisions of section 4(b) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

            Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 138

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
                   System Jekyll Island Unit GA-06P.
```
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER AFTER HEARING 

ON MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO AMEND 

For the reasons stated on the record at yesterday’s hearing, plaintiff Waymo LLC’s

motion for leave to file an amended list of asserted trade secrets for trial, supplemental expert

reports, and revised witness and exhibit lists (Dkt. No. 2062) is GRANTED IN PART with respect

to expert witnesses, lay witnesses, and exhibits pertaining to currently-asserted trade secrets,

except that defendants’ objection regarding Neel Chatterjee is HELD IN ABEYANCE. This is

subject to the conditions stated on the record and without prejudice to any individual objections

targeted to specific new exhibits. As stated on the record, Waymo’s motion is otherwise HELD

IN ABEYANCE with respect to its proposed new trade secret claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 27, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 2129 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 11297 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DILLARD DERRICK RICHARDSON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 275

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dillard Derrick
Richardson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Richardson h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2 2 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-11297 Document: 00513242602 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015No. 14

- 11297

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-11297 Document: 00513242602 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015