alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10824]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[NC-63-1-6394b; FRL-5189-4]


Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Emission Statement 
Implementation Plan for North Carolina

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve the State implementation plan 
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of North Carolina for the purpose 
of establishing an emission statement program. In the final rules 
section of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP 
revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rational for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are 
received in response to that direct final rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period 
on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document 
should do so at this time.

DATES: To be considered, comments must be received by June 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to: Joey LeVasseur, 
Regulatory Planning and Development Section, Air Programs Branch, Air, 
Pesticides & Toxics Management Division, Region 4 Environmental 
Protection Agency, 345 Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365.
    Copies of the material submitted by the State of Florida may be 
examined during normal business hours at the following locations:

Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (Air Docket 6102), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20460.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Air Programs Branch, 345 
Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365.
Air Resources Management Division, Florida Department of Environmental 
Protection, Twin Towers Office Building, 2600 Blair Stone Road, 
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joey LeVasseur, Regulatory Planning 
and Development Section, Air Programs Branch, Air, Pesticides & Toxics 
Management Division, Region 4 Environmental Protection Agency, 345 
Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365. The telephone number is 
404/347-3555 ext. 4215. Reference file NC70-2-6861.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule which is published in the rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: March 28, 1995.
Patrick M. Tobin,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-10824 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

JOHN A. INDIVERI, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RICHARD MACK, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 17-00595 BLF (PR) 

ORDER OF SERVICE ON 

DEFENDANTS ELLEN GREENMAN, 

M.D., AND KATHRYN GRAHAM 

Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, proceeding pro se, filed a second amended civil 

rights complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at the 

Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) and the medical appeals office. (Docket No. 38.) 

On August 9, 2018, the Court screened the SAC and directed the Clerk of the Court to mail 

service documents to Defendants Ellen Greenman, MD, and Kathryn Graham at SVSP. 

(Docket No. 47.) On August 31, 2018, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a notice 

providing the Court with current and accurate location information for Defendants Ellen 

Greenman, MD, and Kathryn Graham such that the Marshal is able to effect service. 

(Docket No. 51.) Plaintiff has filed a response to the Court’s August 31, 2018 Order 

stating that Defendants Ellen Greenman, MD, and Kathryn Graham receive mail at 

Building C, P.O. Box 588500, Elk Grove, California 95758. (Docket No. 57.) Plaintiff’s 
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

notice includes an exhibit which indicates that Defendant Ellen Greenman, M.D., worked 

at California Correctional Health Care Services. (Docket No. 57 at 3.) 

Based on the information provided, the Court will order the matter served on 

Defendants Ellen Greenman, MD, and Kathryn Graham at the address provided by 

Plaintiff. 

 The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for 

Waiver of Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy 

of the second amended complaint, (Docket No. 38), all attachments thereto, a copy of the 

Court’s August 9, 2018 Order, (Docket No. 47), and a copy of this order upon Defendants 

Ellen Greenman, MD, and Kathryn Graham at California Correctional Health Care 

Services, Building C, P.O. Box 588500, Elk Grove, California 95758. The Clerk shall 

also mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants who have already 

appeared in this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ ________________________ 

BETH LABSON FREEMAN 

United States District Judge 

Order of Service on Defs. Greem,am amd Graham 

PRO-SE\HRL\CR.17\00595Indiveri_serve-Greenman and Graham
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RENE LOPEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00758-NC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendants Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and JP Morgan 

Chase Bank, N.A. moved to dismiss plaintiff Rene Lopez’s complaint for failure to state a 

claim under FRCP 12(b)(6). Dkt. Nos. 15, 24. The response to Fannie Mae’s motion was 

due June 29, 2017, and the response to JP Morgan’s motion was due August 4, 2017. 

Lopez has not filed a response to either.

Thus, the Court ORDERS Lopez to show cause why the action should not be 

dismissed for failure to prosecute. Lopez must respond to this order within 14 days, by 

August 21, 2017, indicating his intent to prosecute his claims and responding to the

motions to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 7, 2017 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

JUDGMENT

On May 21, 2019, the Court entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and 

found that Defendant violated the Federal Trade Commission Act. ECF No. 1490. Accordingly, 

the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. The Clerk shall close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 21, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1492 Filed 05/21/19 Page 1 of 1
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10924]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
33 CFR Part 110

[CGD09-93-033]

Special Anchorage Area, Lake Superior, La Pointe Harbor, Madeline 
Island, WI; Correction

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Correction to final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final rule (CGD09-
93-033), which was published Wednesday, March 22, 1995 (60 FR 15052). 
The regulation established a Special Anchorage Area on Lake Superior, 
La Pointe Harbor, Madeline Island, Wisconsin.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marine Science Technician Second Class Jeffrey M. Yunker, Ninth Coast 
Guard District, Aids to Navigation and Waterways Management Branch, 
Room 2083, 1240 East Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44199-2060, (216) 
522-3990.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Drafting Information

    The drafters of this notice are Lieutenant Junior Grade Byron D. 
Willeford, Project Officer, Ninth Coast Guard District, Aids to 
Navigation and Waterways Management Branch, and Lieutenant Karen E. 
Lloyd, Project Attorney, Ninth Coast Guard District Legal Office.

Background

    The final rule that is the subject of these corrections, 
established a Special Anchorage Area on Lake Superior, La Pointe 
Harbor, Madeline Island, Wisconsin.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final rule contained errors which incorrectly 
state the coordinates of the Special Anchorage Area. This may cause a 
mariner to anchor his or her vessel in an inappropriate area and must 
therefore be corrected.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on March 22, 1995, of the final rule 
[CGD09-93-033] which was the subject of FR Doc. 95-6955, is corrected 
as follows:

Sec. 110.775  [Corrected]

    1. The coordinates in Sec. 110.77b, on page 15053 in the first 
column should be corrected to read as follows:

Latitude                             Longitude                          
46 deg.46'21.5'' N                   090 deg.46'59'' W, to              
46 deg.46'36'' N                     090 deg.47'13'' W, to              
46 deg.46'41'' N                     090 deg.47'13'' W, thence          
along the natural shoreline and structures to:                          
46 deg.46'21.5'' N                   090 deg.46'59'' W.                 
                                                                        

    Dated: April 18, 1995.
Rudy K. Peschel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 95-10924 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
```
#### Vo Vu THANH, Petitioner—Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, RespondentAppellant. Mot Trung Tran, Petitioner—Appellee, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondent—Appellant.

Nos. 03-15920, 03-16058.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 11, 2004.

Decided May 17, 2004.

Ann C. McClintock, AFPD, Carolyn M. Wiggin, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Daniel E. Goldman, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Marianne Pansa, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Shelley R. *560Goad, Esq., Daniel E. Goldman, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellant.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILER,* and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

ORDER **

These appeals are dismissed as moot.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
INSPIRATO LLC, Appellant, v. John CIAFONE and Gina Argento, Appellees.

No. 3D18-355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, and David Axelman, Miami, for appellant.

L.E. Burgess, P.A., and Laura E. Burgess, Miami, for appellees.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Biscayne Inv. Group, Ltd. v. Guar. Mgmt. Servs.*, 903 So.2d 251, 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding: "A cause of action for breach of contract brought by a third party beneficiary must include the following allegations: (1) the existence of a contract; (2) the clear or manifest intent of the contracting parties that the contract primarily and directly benefit the third party; (3) breach of the contract by a contracting party; and (4) damages to the third-party resulting from the breach;" further holding: "A non-party is the specifically intended beneficiary only if the contract clearly expresses an intent to primarily and directly benefit the third party or a class of persons to which that party belongs") (citing *Security Mut. Cas. Co. v. Pacura*, 402 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) and *Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Jelac Corp.*, 505 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) ). *See also**Hollywood Lakes Country Club, Inc. v. Community Ass'n Servs., Inc.*, 770 So.2d 716, 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming trial court's dismissal of cause of action under third-party beneficiary theory, where the contract attached to the complaint failed to establish an intent to directly and substantially benefit the developer asserting third-party beneficiary status).
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 120 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 

for a ceremony as part of the unveiling of the statue of Johnny Cash, 

provided by the State of Arkansas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2024 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself, Mr. HILL, Mr. WOMACK, and Mr. WESTERMAN) 

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for a ceremony as part of the unveiling 

of the statue of Johnny Cash, provided by the State 

of Arkansas. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR A CERE4 MONY AS PART OF THE UNVEILING OF THE 

5 STATUE OF JOHNNY CASH. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on Sep8 tember 24, 2024, for a ceremony as part of the unveiling 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HCON 120 IH 

1 of the statue of Johnny Cash, provided by the State of 

2 Arkansas. 

3 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

4 ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out 

5 in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the 

6 Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00275-CV

In re Josephine Douglas-Peters

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Filed: May 24, 2006
Travis Michael UNDERWOOD, petitioner, v. Mary BERGHUIS, Warden.

No. 12-9681.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(c)


                             TXU US Holdings Company


                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


     The undersigned,  Michael J. McNally, Principal Financial Officer of TXU US
Holdings Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

   1. The  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended
      September  30, 2002 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
      requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and

   2. Information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has caused  this  instrument  to be
executed this 14th day of November, 2002.




                                           /s/     Michael J. McNally
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Michael J. McNally
                                           Title: Principal Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11283]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[Report No. 2069]

Petition for Reconsideration of Actions in Rulemaking Proceedings

May 2, 1995.
    Petition for reconsideration have been filed in the Commission 
rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document are 
available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Opposition to this petition must 
be filed May 24, 1995. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules 
(47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 
days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

Subject: Eligibility for the Specialized Mobile Radio Services and 
Radio Services in the 220-222 MHz Land Mobile Band and Use of Radio 
Dispatch Communications. (GEN Docket No. 94-90)

    Number of Petition Filed: 1
Subject: Allocation of the 219-220 MHz Band for Use by the Amateur 
Radio Service. (ET Docket No. 94-40)

    Number of Petition Filed: 1
Subject: Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Adopt 
Regulations for Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems. (PR Docket No. 
93-61)

    Number of Petitions Filed: 20.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11283 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
```
Learning Management User Guide 

Add External Training 

Revision History 

This document was prepared by: 

Date Document 

Version 

Document Revision Description Document Author 

5-27-2022 01 First draft for FDA OTED review Sam Dillener 
 

 

 

 

Add External Training 

This section shows a learner how to submit a request to add External Training to their Transcript. 

This is how learners can request credit for prerequisites that they have already completed. 

1. From the 

Navigation Bar, 

hover over 

Learning and 

select Add 

External Training 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This form gives you the 

opportunity to add 

training to your record 

that 1) you have 

already taken, and 2) is 

external to ORA 

LearnED. Fill out all 

required fields. 

If you are requesting a 

prerequisite override, 

make sure to select 

that option. 

Click Submit when the 

form is complete. 

After submitting the 

form, you will land on 

your Active Transcript. 

Find the title of the 

training you just 

submitted and click 

Mark Complete. 

Tip: It helps to filter by 

date added. 

The training will now 

be in a Pending 

Completion 

Approval status. 

You will be notified 

by email whether 

your request was 

approved or 

denied.
Amendment #14 to the Trust Agreement



 Exhibit 10(o) 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER FOURTEEN 
  
 TO 
  
 GRANTOR TRUST AGREEMENT 

 
 THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the 28th day of June, 2002 by and between THE
BANK OF NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK (formerly known as THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK), a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the New York (hereinafter referred to as the “Trustee”). 
  
 W  I  T  N  E  S  S  E  T  H  : 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Trustee entered into a Grantor Trust Agreement dated as of November 16, 1993 (as amended from
time to time, the “Agreement”); 
  
 WHEREAS, Article
TWELFTH of the Agreement provides that the Company may amend the Agreement; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Agreement; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Trustee agree as follows, effective June 28, 2002: 
  
 Exhibit I to the Agreement is amended by deleting Exhibit I in its entirety and substituting therefor Exhibit I in the form attached hereto. 

 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be
executed in their respective names by their duly authorized officers under their corporate seals as of the day and year first above written. 
  

									
	 ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 THE BANK OF NEW YORK COMPANY, INC.

					
	 	 	/s/    PATRICIA A. BICKET        	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    BRUCE W. VAN SAUN        
	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Bruce W. Van Saun
 Senior Executive Vice President


  

									
	 ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK

					
	 	 	/s/    BARRY O’CONNOR        	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    GERARD STAFFORD - SMITH        
	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Name:
	 	Gerard Stafford - Smith
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	Vice President

  

 - 1 - 








 Exhibit 10(o) 
  
 EXHIBIT I 
  

	1.	The Bank of New York Company, Inc. Excess Benefit Plan 

  

	2.	The Bank of New York Company, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 

  

	3.	Severance Agreements between The Bank of New York Company, Inc. and the following persons: 

  

			
	 Individual

	  	Date of Agreement


	 Thomas P. Gibbons
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Leslie V. Godridge
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Alan R. Griffith
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Gerald L. Hassell
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Newton P.S. Merrill
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Donald R. Monks
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Robert J. Mueller
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Thomas J. Perna
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Charles E. Rappold II
	  	September 30, 2000
	 Thomas A. Renyi
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Brian G. Rogan
	  	July 11, 2000
	 J. Michael Shepherd
	  	January 22, 2001
	 Bruce W. Van Saun
	  	July 11, 2000
	 Joseph M. Velli
	  	July 11, 2000

  

 -2-
In re Robert Earl TIPPENS, Jr., petitioner.

No. 12-8665.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
In re Douglas A. GLASER, petitioner.

No. 12-9514.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.