DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 

dc-882306 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)

MJacobs@mofo.com 

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) 

AGonzalez@mofo.com 

ERIC A. TATE (CA SBN 178719) 

ETate@mofo.com 

RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426) 

RKim@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, California 94105-2482 

Telephone: 415.268.7000 

Facsimile: 415.268.7522 

KAREN L. DUNN (Pro Hac Vice) 

kdunn@bsfllp.com 

HAMISH P.M. HUME (Pro Hac Vice) 

hhume@bsfllp.com 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 

1401 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington DC 20005 

Telephone: 202.237.2727 

Facsimile: 202.237.6131 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

and OTTOMOTTO LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

WAYMO LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF PARTIAL 

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT 

Date: June 8, 2017 

Time: 8:00 a.m. 

Ctrm: 8, 19th Floor 

Judge: The Honorable William Alsup 

Trial Date: October 2, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 430 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 2
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

dc-882306 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

At the hearing on May 3, 2017, the Court informed the parties of the following rule for 

summary judgment motions in this case: 

You can bring this summary judgment motion, but if you don’t win 

it, no more summary judgment motions. That’s true. So each of 

you get one free bite. 

Mr. Jacobs has taken his one free bite. You get one free bite. And 

if you win, you get to bring another one. If you lose, that’s the end 

of the line for summary judgment. 

(5/3/2017 AM Public Hr’g Tr. 123:19-24.) As the Court noted, Defendants Uber 

Technologies, Inc., Ottomotto LLC, and Otto Trucking LLC (“Defendants”) had already filed a 

Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (“Motion”) on May 2, 2017, prior to the 

hearing. 

In view of the Court’s comments, Defendants hereby withdraw the portions of their 

Motion directed to Spider. (ECF No. 331 at 1:11-16, 4:24-5:20, 6:4-7:13, 7:16-17 (“and 

Waymo’s Third, Fourth, and Sixth Causes of Action should be dismissed with prejudice”).) 

Defendants reserve all rights to move for summary judgment of non-infringement as to Spider at 

a later date. 

Defendants maintain the portions of their Motion directed to Fuji. (ECF No. 331 at 

1:1-10, 1:16-17 (“Summary judgment of noninfringement should be granted for the ’922, ’464, 

and ’273 patents”), 1:18-4:23, 5:21-6:3, 7:15-16 (“For the foregoing reasons, summary judgment 

of non-infringement of the ’922, ’464, and ’273 patents should be entered”).) 

Dated: May 12, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/Michael A. Jacobs

MICHAEL A. JACOBS 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

and OTTOMOTTO LLC 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 430 Filed 05/12/17 Page 2 of 2