alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20240-20241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10081]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7136

[OR-943-1430-01; GP5-083; OR-49219]


Withdrawal of Public Lands for the Galice Creek Recreation Area; 
Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order withdraws 290.02 acres of Revested Oregon and 
California Railroad Grant Lands from surface entry and mining for a 
period of 20 years for the Bureau of Land Management to protect the 
Galice Creek Recreation Area located in Josephine County. The lands 
have been and remain open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Sullivan, BLM Oregon/Washington 
State Office, P.O. Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208-2965, 503-952-6171.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and [[Page 20241]] Management 
Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the following described public 
lands are hereby withdrawn from settlement, sale, location, or entry 
under the general land laws, including the United States mining laws 
(30 U.S.C. Ch. 2 (1988)), but not from leasing under the mineral 
leasing laws, to protect the significant historic and recreational 
values along Galice Creek:

Willamette Meridian

Revested Oregon and California Railroad Grant Lands

T. 34 S., R. 8 W.,
    Sec. 35, S\1/2\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\.
T. 35 S., R. 8 W.,
    Sec. 2, lots 7 to 14, inclusive, and lots 16, 17, and 19, N\1/
2\SW\1/4\NE\1/4\, SE\1/4\NW\1/4\, and NW\1/4\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 3, SE\1/4\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\ and E\1/2\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\.

    The areas described aggregate 290.02 acres in Josephine County.

    2. The withdrawal made by this order does not alter the 
applicability of those public land laws governing the use of the lands 
under lease, license, or permit, or governing the disposal of their 
mineral or vegetative resources other than under the mining laws.
    3. This withdrawal will expire 20 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1988), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: April 4, 1995.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 95-10081 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 126 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 126

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2005

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend Public Law 89-366 to allow for an adjustment in the number of 
    free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN NUMBER OF FREE ROAMING HORSES PERMITTED IN 
              CAPE LOOKOUT NATIONAL SEASHORE, NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--The first subsection (b) of section 5 of Public 
Law 89-366 (16 U.S.C. 459g-4) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``100 free roaming 
        horses'' and inserting ``not less than 110 free roaming horses, 
        with a target population of between 120 and 130 free roaming 
        horses,'';
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting the following new subparagraph:
            ``(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a plan to 
        maintain the viability of the herd; or''; and
            (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ``100'' and inserting 
        ``110''.
    (b) Repeal of Duplicate Subsection.--Section 5 of Public Law 89-366 
is further amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``(a)'' after ``(a)''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the second subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of California

WAYMO LLC

3:17-cv-00939

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; OTTOMOTTO, LLC;

OTTO TRUCKING LLC

Otto Trucking LLC c/o Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite

400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808

Charles K. Verhoeven

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

50 California Street, Floor 22

San Francisco, California 94111

02/23/2017

JCS February 28, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan Y. Soong
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

3:17-cv-00939

0.00

JCS
#### The SHERMAN R. SMOOT CORP., Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, Appellee.

No. 03-1503.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 4, 2004.

Richard S. Ewing, Principal Attorney, Donald E. Kinner, David M. Cohen, of Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Christopher Lee Grant, Principal Attorney, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and DYE, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*719
      *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Quintrilles Cortez GARDNER, petitioner, v. Michael D. CREWS, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 12-8779.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 25255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11594]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD


Panel Meeting on System Safety, Human Factors, and Transportation 
Issues

    Pursuant to its authority under section 5051 of Public Law 100-203, 
the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987, the Nuclear Waste 
Technical Review Board's (the Board) Panel on Transportation & Systems 
will hold a meeting June 14, 1995, in Arlington, Virginia. The meeting, 
which is open to the public, will be held at the Holiday Inn Arlington 
at Ballston (near the Ballston Metro stop on the Orange Line), 4610 
North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203; Tel (703) 243-9800; Fax 
(703) 527-2677.
    The one-day meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. The agenda includes 
discussion of the application of system safety and human factors 
engineering to the Department of Energy's (DOE) civilian radioactive 
waste management program. For example, the Department of Energy (DOE) 
will present a safety analysis of tunnel boring machine operations at 
Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The agenda also includes a review of progress 
in the multipurpose canister (MPC) development effort and updates on 
parts of the DOE's transportation program, including developments in 
truck cask certification.
    As with all the Board's meetings, time will be set aside on the 
agenda for comments and questions from the public. To ensure that 
everyone wishing to speak is offered time to do so, the Board 
encourages those who have comments to sign the Public Comment Register 
which will be located at the sign-in table on the day of the meeting. 
Written comments for the record also may be submitted to the Board 
staff at the sign-in table.
    The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was created by Congress in 
the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 to evaluate the 
technical and scientific validity of activities undertaken by the DOE 
in its program to manage the disposal of the nation's high-level 
radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. In that same legislation, 
Congress directed the DOE to characterize a site at Yucca Mountain, 
Nevada, for its suitability as a potential location for a permanent 
repository for the disposal of that waste.
    Transcripts of the meeting will be available on computer disk or on 
a library-loan basis in paper format from Davonya Barnes, Board staff, 
beginning August 9, 1995. For further information, contact Frank 
Randall, External Affairs, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, 1100 
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 910, Arlington, Virginia 22209; (703) 235-4473.

    Dated: May 5, 1995.
William Barnard,
Executive Director, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11594 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AM-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20658

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN MANUEL HERNANDEZ-ARTIGA, also known as Ricardo Mendes, 

also known as Ernesto R. Rivera, also known as Ricardo Mendes Castro,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-331-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Manuel 

Hernandez-Artiga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Artiga has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 18, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-20658 Document: 00514687975 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2018
No. 17-20658

2

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-20658 Document: 00514687975 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2018
Jamie BROWN, petitioner, v. Joseph F. MAZURKIEWICZ, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greensburg, et al.

No. 12-9399.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Benjamin ACUNA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9960.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Presidential Documents

22247

Federal Register

Vol. 60, No. 86

Friday, May 5, 1995

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 6795 of May 3, 1995

Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month, 1995

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

Like so many people of this Nation, Americans of Asian and Pacific ancestry

enjoy dual heritage-the great cultures of the lands of their forebearers and

the rich traditions of liberty and equality cherished by the United States.

Bringing new values and customs to these shores, Asian and Pacific Americans have immeasurably enriched the quality and character of this country.

In every field of endeavor, in public and private sector alike, they have

endowed our Nation with unparalleled energy and vision.

We owe a debt of gratitude to these Americans, both for the gift of their

talents and for helping us build bridges of understanding to their ancestral

lands in the Pacific Community—bridges that help our economies to grow

and that widen the path to peace.

Today, our Nation stands at the dawn of a new era of hope and opportunity.

We depend as never before on the active involvement of every one of

our people to meet the challenges of our changing world. With the strength

of our diversity and a continued commitment to the ideal of freedom,

all Americans will share in the blessings of the bright future that awaits

us.

To honor the achievements of Asian/Pacific Americans and to recognize

their many contributions to our Nation, the Congress, by Public Law 102-

450, has designated the month of May as ‘‘Asian/Pacific American Heritage

Month.’’

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, do hereby proclaim May 1995, as Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month. I call upon the people of the United States to observe this

occasion with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of

May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and of

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and

[FR Doc. 95–11269

Filed 5–3–95; 2:26 pm]

Billing code 3195–01–P

nineteenth.

œ–
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D.C., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00719-MEJ 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On June 7, 2017, Defendants City of Antioch and Allan Cantando filed a Motion to 

Dismiss four of the six claims Plaintiffs assert in their Complaint, with a noticed hearing date of 

August 3, 2017. Dkt. No. 15. However, Plaintiffs failed to file an opposition pursuant to Civil 

Local Rule 7. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the motion hearing and ORDERS 

Plaintiffs to show cause why the Court should not grant the Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs shall file 

a declaration by July 13, 2017. If a responsive declaration is filed, the Court shall issue an order 

based on the declaration. Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be 

deemed an admission that Plaintiffs do not oppose the merits of the Motion. If no written 

response is filed, the Court will grant the Motion, and the only claims remaining in the action will 

be a claim for wrongful death against Defendant Valentino Walker and a claim for intentional 

infliction of emotional distress against Walker. Thus, it is imperative that the Court receive a 

written response by the deadline above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 26, 2017

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge
Dwayne K. CALTON, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. AATRIA, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1760

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Michael Eugene SMITH, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-65

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the amended annual report of Liberty Silver Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Geoff Browne, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Geoff BrowneChief Executive Officer Date: Date: April 14, 2011
Frederic BOURKE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-531.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Raymond D. COMER, Jr., petitioner, v. Rob PERSSON, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution.

No. 12-8633.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

egale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

jangelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 100

Roseville, California 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Victor Vazquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

VICTOR VAZQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EQUIFAX, INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 3:17-CV-00424-RS

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, 

INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Victor Vazquez and defendant 

Equifax, Inc. (“Equifax”), that Equifax be dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, section 41(a)(2), and that each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:17-cv-00424-RS Document 37 Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

DATED: July 7, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Victor Vazquez

DATED: July 7, 2017 Nokes & Quinn

By: /s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr.

Thomas P. Quinn, Jr.

Attorneys for Defendant

Equifax, Inc.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Thomas P. Quinn, Jr. has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Equifax is dismissed with prejudice, and that each 

party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7/7/2017

Case 3:17-cv-00424-RS Document 37 Filed 07/10/17 Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SUNRISE, Appellant, v. Lourdes COLON, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2473

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 19, 2019]

Christopher J. Stearns and Jonathan H. Railey of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Scott M. Behren of Behren Law Firm, Weston, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*667*Affirmed* . *See**Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA* , 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla. 1999) ("[I]f a trial court reaches the right result, but for the wrong reasons, it will be upheld if there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record."); Fla. Admin. Code R. 1B-24.003(1)(a), General Records Schedule GS-1-SL for State and Local Government Agencies (eff. Aug. 2017) (personnel information for temporary employees must be retained for three fiscal years after any manner of separation or termination of employment).

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., May and Conner, JJ., concur.