alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11178]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 88 / Monday, May 8, 1995 / Rules and 
Regulations
[[Page 22455]]

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AG53


Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of New York, NY, Special 
Wage Schedules for Printing Positions

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management is issuing a final rule to 
abolish the Federal Wage System special wage schedule for printing 
positions in the New York, New York, wage area. Printing and 
lithographic employees in New York, New York, will now be paid rates 
from the regular New York, New York, wage schedule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 7, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul Shields, (202) 606-2848.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 27, 1995, OPM published an 
interim rule to abolish the Federal Wage System special wage schedule 
for printing positions in the New York, New York, wage area. The 
interim rule provided a 30-day period for public comment. OPM received 
no comments during the comment period. Therefore, the interim rule is 
being adopted as a final rule.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that these regulations will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they 
will affect only Federal agencies and employees.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.

    Accordingly, under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 5343, the interim rule 
amending 5 CFR part 532 published on January 27, 1995 (60 FR 5312), is 
adopted as final without any changes.

Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 95-11178 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

NOTICE RE QUESTIONS FOR

HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION 

At the hearing this Thursday, both sides should please be prepared to succinctly address

the following questions with copies of relevant case law highlighted and ready to hand up to the

judge, as well as extra copies for opposing counsel. Unless otherwise requested, please limit

supporting case law to one on-point decision per issue.

1. Will Waymo forgo any reliance in this case on any employment or other

agreement with Levandowski containing an arbitration clause? Will Waymo seek to use

any such agreement for any purpose in this case?

2. Will Waymo forgo any claims in any forum against Levandowski similar to

those asserted herein that rely on any agreement containing an arbitration clause?

3. How would provisional relief work in this case if sent to arbitration? Would

provisional relief in arbitration be backed up by the contempt power of the court? Has

any reported decision ever dealt with this issue?

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 263 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. How much discovery and motion practice have occurred in Waymo’s arbitration

proceedings against Levandowski to date? 

Dated: April 25, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 263 Filed 04/25/17 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
13.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Cell Kinetics Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Israel Fisher, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)    
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
June 30, 2008




/s/
      Israel Fisher
              Name:
      Israel Fisher
              Title:
      Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10287]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated February 17, 1995, and published in the Federal 
Register on March 1, 1995, (60 FR 11116), Lonza Riverside, 900 River 
Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made application to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration to be registered as an importer of 
Phenylacetone (8501), as basic class of controlled substance listed in 
Schedule II.
    No comments or objections have been received. Therefore, pursuant 
to section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act 
and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, 
Sec. 1311.42, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of 
the basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: April 10, 1995.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-10287 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1145]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Rotorcraft 
Issues

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a public meeting of the FAA's Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee on rotorcraft issues to discuss current 
rulemaking actions and future activities and plans.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 2, 1995, at 9 a.m. PST. 
Arrange for oral presentations by January 19, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Convention Center, Room No. 
N-224, 3150 Paradise Rd, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109-9096.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Barbara Herber, Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft & Airport Rules 
Division, AIR-200, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone (202) 267-3498.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The referenced meeting is announced pursuant 
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463; 5 U.S.C. App. II). The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Introduction to the Revision of the ARAC procedures.
    <bullet> Report by External Loads Working Group.
    <bullet> Critique on NPRM (94-36) Regarding 14 CFR Parts 27/29. 
Harmonization
    <bullet> Status of Final Occupant Protection Rule.
    <bullet> Review New Tasks.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but will be limited to 
the space available. The Public must make arrangements by January 19, 
1995, to present oral statements at the meeting. Written statements may 
be presented to the committee at any time by providing 16 copies to the 
Assistant Executive Director or by providing the copies to him at the 
meeting. In addition, sign and oral interpretation, as well as a 
listening device, can be made available at the meeting if requested 10 
calendar days before the meeting. Arrangements may be made by 
contacting the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 11, 1995.
Mark Schilling,
Assistant Executive Director for Rotorcraft Issues, Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 95-1145 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
4/28/2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CENTOCOR,
INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS CENTOCOR, INC. CONSOLIDTED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          39,182
<SECURITIES>                                    86,691
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,754
<PP&E>                                         140,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,580
<BONDS>                                        231,640
<COMMON>                                           583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,683)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,072
<SALES>                                         52,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,904
<CGS>                                           23,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,706)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.65)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDY SIMENTAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00801-SI 

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES

Re: Dkt. No. 19

Defendants have filed a request for an extension of the deadline to file their motion for 

summary judgment. Upon due consideration of the request and the accompanying declaration of 

attorney Jillian O’Brien, the court GRANTS the request. Docket No. 19. The court now sets the 

following new briefing schedule: Defendants must file and serve their motion for summary 

judgment no later than December 8, 2017. Plaintiff must file and serve on defense counsel his 

opposition to the motion no later than January 5, 2018. Defendants must file and serve their

reply brief (if any) no later than January 19, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 10, 2017

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge
From: Gruber, Marion <Marion.Gruber@fda.hhs.gov> 

Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 6:29 PM 

To: Marks, Peter <Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov> 

Subject: RE: Request for as meeting 

Dear Peter,

Next Thursday at noon works! see you then.

Marion

From: Marks, Peter <Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov> 

Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 3:41 PM 

To: Gruber, Marion <Marion.Gruber@fda.hhs.gov> 

Subject: RE: Request for as meeting 

Dear Marion, 

No problem. I was planning on being at FDA starting late morning on Thursday. Could noon on 

Thursday work for you? 

In the meantime, I hope that (b) (6)

Your team in vaccines is amazing. 

Best Regards, 

Peter 

From: Gruber, Marion <Marion.Gruber@fda.hhs.gov> 

Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 2:21 PM 

To: Marks, Peter <Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov> 

Subject: Request for as meeting 

Dear Peter,

Are you planning to be at the WO campus next week? I would like to talk to you and I would 

prefer an in-person meeting if at all possible. 

Please let me know and I will schedule around your availability. 

Thanks, 

Marion 

Marion F. Gruber, Ph.D 

Director 
Office of Vaccines Research & Review 

Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research 

Food & Drug Administration, DHHS 

10903 New Hampshire Ave. 

Building 71, Rm. 3230 

Silver Spring, Maryland 20993 

Tel.: (301) 796 1856 

Email: marion.gruber@fda.hhs.gov
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25252-25253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11633]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Wilfred Baker Engineering, Inc. Cooperative 
Research Agreement for Explosion Hazards and Protective Structure 
Designs

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 14, 1995, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), parties to a Cooperative Research 
Agreement have filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) The 
identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties are Wilfred Baker 
Engineering, Inc., San Antonio, TX; Mobil Research and Development 
Corp., Princeton, NJ; Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, OK; 
Exxon Research and Engineering Co., Florham Park, NJ; Shell Oil 
Company, Houston, TX; Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, TN; Chevron 
Research and Technology Company, Richmond, CA; DuPont Company, 
Wilmington, DE; ARCO Chemical Company, Newtown [[Page 25253]] Square, 
PA; Texaco Inc., Bellaire, TX; and Union Carbide Corporation, South 
Charleston, WV. The objective of the venture is to provide one or more 
programs to collect, compile, analyze and distribute information 
regarding explosion hazards and protective structures design as related 
to the refining and chemical processing industry.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-11633 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
```
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE DISCOVERY

HEARING TOMORROW

Defendants shall please bring to the discovery hearing tomorrow:

1. A list of all servers (and their locations) used at any time in any way for

defendants’ LiDAR-related activities. Do not leave anything off the list merely because

some other server supposedly houses the same materials.

2. A list of all of defendants’ officers, directors, and employees, past and present,

who have had LiDAR-related responsibilities or projects, and their locations.

3. A list of all of defendants’ suppliers and consultants, past and present, who have

had LiDAR-related responsibilities or projects, and their locations.

4. The fully completed privilege log.

Defendants must also explain why they told the Court that Anthony Levandowski “has a

good story to tell” (Dkt. No. 131 at 16:10) and were able to obtain signed versions of Mr.

Levandowski’s employment agreements with plaintiff Waymo LLC, but did not review his files

and documents to retrieve the 14,000-plus allegedly downloaded from Waymo.

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 144 Filed 04/04/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff Waymo shall please bring to the discovery hearing tomorrow:

1. The “list of 15 search terms” it proposes (Dkt. No. 135 at 3).

2. A list of the top 50 most important files and documents from among the 14,000-

plus allegedly downloaded by Mr. Levandowski, possibly to be used to prioritize and to

expedite any subsequent searches.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 4, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 144 Filed 04/04/17 Page 2 of 2
Reset Form

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States of America Case No: 17-CR-00093

)
Plaintiff(s), APPLICATION FOR
7 ) ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY
: : ) PRO HAC VICE
Elizabeth Gobert ; (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)
Defendant(s). ;
1, Dwazendra J. Smith an active member in good standing of the bar of
The Supreme Ct. of La. hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the
Northern District of California representing: Elizabeth Gobert in the
above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is Adante Pointer an

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office
within the State of California.

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD:

521 E. Landry Street 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120

Opelousas, LA 70570 Oakland, CA 94621

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 7 LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: -
(337) 948-8008 _ (510) 839-5200 _

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:
dwa@doranlawfirm.com adante.pointer @johnburrislaw.com

Tam an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of
another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: 32696

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said
bar is attached to this application.

Lagree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the
Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: 10/30/17 Dwazendra J. Smith
APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of Dwazendra J. Smith is granted,
subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate
appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel
designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.

Dated: UCtober 30, 201/. Tbs Phen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/ MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER
*

Video & RTC Update

March 8, 2013

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176067

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 11
Agenda

Feature Updates

FaceTime Relay P2P Upgrade

HEVC

GameCenter: 

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176068

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 11
Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 3 of 11
FaceTime Relay P2P Upgrade

Motivation

All FaceTime calls are forced to use relay

Problem: Apple pays for all the relay bandwidth

Goal: Reduce FaceTime relay usage as much as possible

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176070

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 4 of 11
FaceTime Relay P2P Upgrade

Solution: Use the relay channel to restore a P2P connection

Restore all previous P2P calls before Forced Relay

Relay usage is greatly reduced

WiFi: 100% -> 16%

Cell: 100% -> 28%

All work has been submitted to Innsbruck and Cab

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176071

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 5 of 11
HEVC Development Goals

FaceTime over Cellular (Innsbruck+1)

FToC 

 

iTunes movie store encodings

 bandwidth savings for download and streaming (Demo)

Apple HEVC hardware encoder design

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176072

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 6 of 11
HEVC FaceTime Status

8-bit decoder and low-delay encoder functionality 

Next step: Migration to the final standard spec

Challenge: encoder performance and power

Fast mode decision algorithms and low-level optimization

Hardware acceleration

Power/Thermal aware adaptation

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176073

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 7 of 11
10-bit HEVC

Demo

Eliminates banding artifacts

Provides additional bit savings

Working with SEG for 10-bit HEVC hardware decoding support

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176074

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 8 of 11
Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 9 of 11
GameCenter: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176076

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 10 of 11
Thank You!

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00176077

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-20 Filed 10/18/18 Page 11 of 11
Daniel R. RICHARDSON, Jr. and Vergel Simpson, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3837

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed. Denied.
Allen Dwayne TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.