alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −10)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for

the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F. Supp. 3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 25 additional action(s) have

been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to

Judge Chhabria.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall

be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

Case MDL No. 2741 Document 103 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 2

Feb 15, 2017

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 145 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 2

hi

nel I hereby certify that the annexed 

instrument is a true and correct copy 

of the original on file in my office.

 ATTEST:

 SUSAN Y. SOONG

 Clerk, U.S. District Court

 Northern District of California

 

 by: 

 Deputy Clerk

 Date: 

 

15 February 2017

FILED

Feb 15, 2017

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv-00781-VC Document 4 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 2
IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−10 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2 17−00208 Galvan v. Monsanto Company

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 145 Filed 02/15/17 Page 2 of 2 Case 3:17-cv-00781-VC Document 4 Filed 02/15/17 Page 2 of 2 Case MDL No. 2741 Document 103 Filed 02/15/17 Page 2 of 2
exv10w63






Exhibit 10.63




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT by and between BIOGEN IDEC INC., (the “Company”), and Cecil B. Pickett (the
“Executive”), dated as of October 28, 2008.



     WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of June
21, 2006 (the “June 21, 2006 Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to amend the June 21, 2006 Agreement as set
forth herein.



     NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:




	 	1.	 	Attachment D of the June 21, 2006 Agreement is hereby amended and restated in
the following manner:






	 	•	 	Strike the phrase in the first paragraph “which is not promptly cured after
written notice.”
	 
	 	•	 	Add the following language to the end of the first paragraph:
	 
	 	 	 	; or (F) an Involuntary Employment Action as defined in connection with a Corporate
Transaction or Change in Control (defined in the 2008 Omnibus Plan). Prior to your
termination of employment, you must notify the Chief Legal Counsel or the Head of
Human Resources of Biogen Idec in writing of the basis you are terminating your
employment in connection with sections (A) through (F) of this paragraph. This
written notice must be given to the Company within one year of the circumstances
giving rise to you terminating your employment and Biogen Idec will have up to 30
days after the date of your notice to cure such circumstances.





Signed:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Cecil B. Pickett
 

Cecil B. Pickett (Executive)

	 	 	 	     10/28/08
 

Date
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Craig E. Schneier
 

Craig E. Schneier (on behalf of the Company)

	 	 	 	     10/30/08
 

Date
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10786]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
[Finance Docket No. 32630]


Omaha Public Power District--Construction Exemption--in Otoe 
County, NE

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce Commission.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, under 49 U.S.C. 10505, conditionally exempts 
from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10901 the 
construction by Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) of a 5-mile line of 
railroad in Otoe County, NE, subject to the results of the Commission's 
environmental review and further decision. The line will extend from 
OPPD's Nebraska City electric generating plant, cross Burlington 
Northern Railroad Company's rail line at grade northwest of the plant, 
and connect with Union Pacific Railroad Company's rail line southwest 
of Nebraska City.

DATES: The exemption cannot become effective until after the 
environmental process has been completed. At that time, the Commission 
will issue a further decision addressing the environmental matters and 
establishing an exemption effective date, if appropriate. Petitions to 
reopen must be filed by May 23, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to Finance Docket No. 32630 to: (1) 
Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Interstate Commerce 
Commission, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20423; and (2) 
petitioner's representative: Thomas W. Wilcox, Donelan, Cleary, Wood & 
Maser, P.C., 1100 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20005-3934.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Commission's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write 
to, call, or pick up in person from: Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Interstate 
Commerce Commission Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 2229, 
Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357/4359. [Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: April 13, 1995.

    By the Commission, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Owen, and 
Commissioners Simmons and McDonald.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10786 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0600

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ASHLEY MARIA HOWARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Sheena Jendro 

Cobb is granted an extension of time to and including May 12, 2021, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 25 2021

03/25/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0600
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035 

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MISSION LAW FIRM, P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

E-mail: service@mission.legal

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Ronny-marie Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONNY-MARIE WILSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. dba 

RED ROBIN BURGER & SPIRITS 

EMPORIUMS, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 5:17-cv-00685-BLF

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Ronny-marie Wilson

(“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Red Robin International, Inc. dba Red Robin Gourmet Burgers 

(erroneously sued as Red Robin International, Inc., dba Red Robin Burger and Spirits 

Emporiums) (“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), the parties remaining in

this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(2), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendant that the Court shall 

expressly retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of adjudicating any subsequent 
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

motion Plaintiff may bring to recover her attorneys’ fees and costs. Any such motion shall be 

filed within 45 days of the date the Court issues its Order on this stipulation. 

Dated: May 17, 2018 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Ronny-marie Wilson

Dated: May 17, 2018 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

/s/ Alden J. Parker

Alden J. Parker

Katherine P. Sandberg

Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Defendant,

Red Robin International, Inc. 

dba Red Robin Gourmet Burgers

(erroneously sued as Red Robin Burger and 

Spirits Emporiums)

ATTESTATION

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s) 

whose electronic signature is attributed above.

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Ronny-marie Wilson
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The Court shall expressly retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of 

adjudicating any motion brought by Plaintiff to recover her attorneys’ fees and costs.

 2. Plaintiff shall file any motion for the recovery of her attorneys’ fees within 45 

days of the date of this Order. 

 3. Except as provided for in paragraph 1, the action is dismissed with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

 HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN 

 United States District Judge 

0D\
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10857]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1048-DR]


Oklahoma; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-1048-DR), dated April 26, 
1995, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 26, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pauline C. Campbell, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated April 26, 1995, the President declared a major disaster under the 
authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as follows:

    I have determined that the explosion at the Alfred P. Murrah 
Federal building in Oklahoma City, on April 19, 1995, in the State 
of Oklahoma is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a 
major disaster under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act). I, therefore, declare 
that such a major disaster exists in Oklahoma County in the State of 
Oklahoma.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby 
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes, such 
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and 
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance in the 
designated area. Public Assistance may be added at a later date, if 
requested and warranted.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section 
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public 
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed 
six months after the date of this declaration.
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive 
Order 12148, I hereby appoint Dell Greer of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this 
declared disaster.
    I do hereby determine the following area of the State of Oklahoma 
to have been affected aversely by this declared major disaster:

    Oklahoma County for Individual Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 95-10857 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 129 

To allow a waiver or exemption of certain requirements for restricted airspace 

if security is not reduced. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mrs. JONES of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To allow a waiver or exemption of certain requirements for 

restricted airspace if security is not reduced. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN RESTRICTED AIR SPACE WAIVER. 

4 Section 521(a)(2) of the Transportation, Treasury, 

5 and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2004 

6 (Public Law 108–199, div. F) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara8 graph (B)(v); 
2 

•HR 129 IH 

1 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub2 paragraph (C) and inserting the following: ‘‘; and’’; 

3 and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(D) to allow the operation of an aircraft 

6 participating in an air show in restricted air7 space if the Administrator of the Federal Avia8 tion Administration, in consultation with the 

9 Secretary of the Department of Homeland Se10 curity, determines that the safety of an event is 

11 not compromised.’’. 

Æ
本文件由美国食品和药物管理局妇女健康

办公室(OWH)和全国连锁药店协会

(NACDS)制定 。 

大约30%至50%的药物使用者未按指示

使用药物。 这会导致更多的患者就医,

住院,医生损失工资和改变处方。 每年

美国人花费的所有这些费用超过1000亿

美元 。

成年人常常为全家人以及自己保存药。

所以我们需要阅读药物标签,避免出现

问题,并提出问题,做好记录 。

1. 阅读药物标签

你标签应显示:

成分清单 - 如果你知道自己对该药中的

任何成分过敏,就不要使用它 。向你的

医生或药剂师要求不同的药物 。

警告 - 请仔细阅读这些内容 。

失效日期 - 请勿在瓶上的日期之后使用

药物 。 它可能已经失效 。

想要了解更多关于药物的信息,请咨询

药剂师 。

2. 避免出现问题

药物会引起问题或副作用,例如嗜睡,呕

吐,出血,头痛或皮疹。 向你的医生,药

剂师或护士询问你所服用药物的副作 。

整理你的药物 。

请勿中断服药 。

请勿分享药物 。

请勿在黑暗中服药 。 

 明智地使用药物

为自己 ... 为那些需要你的人

花时间关爱

妇女健康办公室

www.fda.gov/womens

花时间关爱

为自己......为那些需要你的人

Tiempo Para Cuidar

Su Salud

我的药物
3. 提出问题

• 药物的名称是什么?

• 是否有通用药物?

• 为什么要服用这种药?

• 我什么时候应该服用?

• 我应该空腹服用还是与食物一起服用?

• 服用药物时喝酒安全吗?

• 如果忘记服用,该怎么办?

• 我应该服用多少?

• 我要服用多长时间?

• 我应该注意什么问题?

如果你正在怀孕或哺乳,在服用任何药物

或饮食补充剂之前,请咨询健康专家的意

见。向你的医生、药剂师或护士咨询。她/

他会很高兴帮助你的。

列出任何过敏史

医生

电话号码

4. 保留你的药物使用记录

请选中你使用的药物:

阿司匹林或其他止痛/头痛/发烧

药

过敏药 

抗酸药

感冒药 

止咳药

减肥药/补品

泻药

安眠药 

维他命

矿物质

草药

其他

将此信息保存在你的钱包或口袋中,并出示给你的医生,药剂师或护士。

姓名:

列出你的处方药

服用剂量 服用时间 服用原因 替换次数

 1片

400毫克

每日三次

饭后服用 关节炎 2

日期 我的药物名称

例子 XXXX

请你的医生,药剂师或护士致电1-800-FDA-1088向美国食品和药物管理局报告严重用药问题。
睡眠问题

美国食品和药物管理局女性健康办公室 

www.fda.gov/womens

关于睡眠的事实说明

大多数成年人每晚需要7至8个小时的睡眠。 

并非每个人都能获得所需的睡眠。

有时,您可能由于以下原因而无法入睡:

•压力

•健康问题和药品

•长时间工作/轮班

•光线或噪音

•临睡前饮酒或进食

如果您在大多数晚上都难以入睡或睡不着,您

可能患有一种叫做失眠的睡眠问题。

有些人有更严重的睡眠问题。 如果您有以下

情况,请咨询您的医生:

•白天睡觉

•睡觉时打呼噜或发出窒息的声音

•腿部感觉异常或感觉需要移动腿部

帮助睡眠的药物

有些药物可能会帮助您入睡或保持良好的睡眠

状态。您可能需要医生的处方来购买一些安眠

药物。您也可以购买无需处方的药物。

处方药

处方安眠药对很多人都很有效,但它们可能会

导致严重的副作用。

•与您的医生讨论使用处方安眠药物的所有风

险和益处

•治疗失眠的安眠药物会影响您第二天早上开

车。

•安眠药物可能会引起罕见的副作用,例如:

- 严重的过敏反应

- 脸部严重浮肿

- 当您不完全清醒时打电话,进餐,做爱或开

车等行为

非处方药(OTC)

非处方类安眠药物也有副作用。 阅读“药物说明

书标签”,以了解有关非处方类安眠药物副作用

的更多信息。
 这份情况说明书是由食品及药物管理局女性健康办公室开发的。

想要获得其他女性健康资源,请访问

www.fda.gov/womens

2021

睡眠问题

提高睡眠质量的建议

改变您的夜间习惯可能会改变您的睡眠。

•每天在相同的时间睡觉和起床。

•在黑暗、安静的房间睡觉。

•避免咖啡因和尼古丁。

•睡前不要喝酒。

•睡前做些事情来帮助您放松。

•睡前不要运动。

•下午3点后不要小睡。

•睡觉前不要吃的太饱。

如果您在超过两周的时间内几乎每晚都无法入睡,请与您

的医疗保健提供者联系

睡眠问题 (CHINESE)
Ganiyu A. JAIYEOLA, petitioner, v. FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION.

No. 12-1213.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11018]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Public Information Collections Approved by Office of Management 
and Budget

April 28, 1995.
    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has received Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the following public 
information collection pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 
Pub. L. 96-511. For further information contact Jonathan Cohen, Federal 
Communications Commission, (202) 418-2030.

Federal Communications Commission

    OMB Control No.: 3060-0639.
    Expiration Date: 04/30/98.
    Title: Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act 
Competitive Bidding, PP Docket 93-253, First Report and Order.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 1100 total annual hours; 1 hour per 
response.
    Description: Lottery applicants for voluntary transfer of control 
or assignment must file with the Commission, along with their 
application, the consideration they will receive if the Commission 
grants their application for voluntary transfer of control or 
assignment. Any applicant for voluntary transfer of control or 
assignment would be required to file, together with its application, 
the associated contracts for sale, option agreements, management 
agreements, or other documents disclosing the total consideration 
received in return for the transfer of its license. This information 
should include not only a monetary purchase price, but also any future, 
contingent, in-kind or other consideration (e.g., management or 
consulting contracts either with or without an option to purchase; 
below-market financing).

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11018 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
KPMG
      LLP1601 Market
      StreetPhiladelphia, PA
      19103-2499






Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   The Board
of Members
 Regulus
Group LLC:
  We have
examined management's assessment for those customers that management has
informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth
in Item'1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers
of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios
that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform)
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Regulus Group LLC has determined
that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.
 
 Our
examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.
 
 In our
opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007
is fairly stated, in all material respects.
     /s/ KPMG
LLP
   February
12, 2008
      KPMG
      LLP, a U.S. Limited liavility partnership, is the U.S.member
      firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.