alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004







In
connection with the Annual Report of DATA STORAGE CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Ross Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 7, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Ross BernsteinRoss Bernstein,
                    Chief
      Executive Officer
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 8 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

July 25, 2005

Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 8 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1374

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit aliens who are 

independent living assistants to be accorded status as J nonimmigrants 

to provide in-home living and home support services to adults with 

disabilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005

Mr. COOPER (for himself, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. WAMP, and Mr. GORDON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit 

aliens who are independent living assistants to be accorded status as J nonimmigrants to provide in-home 

living and home support services to adults with disabilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Independent Living 

5 Assistance Access Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 1374 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ACCORDING OF STATUS AS J NONIMMIGRANTS TO 

2 ALIENS WHO ARE INDEPENDENT LIVING AS3 SISTANTS TO PROVIDE IN-HOME LIVING AND 

4 HOME SUPPORT SERVICES TO ADULTS WITH 

5 DISABILITIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (15)(J) of section 

7 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

8 1101(a)) is amended by inserting ‘‘independent living as9 sistant,’’ after ‘‘specialist,’’. 

10 (b) DEFINITION.—Such section is further amended 

11 by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

12 ‘‘(51) The term ‘independent living assistant’ 

13 means an individual who provides in-home living and 

14 home support services to an adult with disabilities. 

15 ‘‘(52) The term ‘in-home living and home sup16 port services’ means services related to personal care 

17 (including assistance with walking, bathing, dress18 ing, and eating), homemaker services (including as19 sistance with shopping, meal preparation, and light 

20 housekeeping), and the performance of routine 

21 household chores (including house cleaning and yard 

22 work). Such term does not include medical care or 

23 any other health service required to be provided by 

24 a licensed health professional or provided under the 

25 direction of a physical or occupational therapist.’’. 
3

•HR 1374 IH 

1 (c) TRAINING.—An alien who is accorded status as 

2 a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Immi3 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J)) as 

4 an independent living assistant (as defined in section 

5 101(a)(51) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), as added 

6 by subsection (b)), shall receive, prior to placement, appro7 priate training related to the provision of in-home living 

8 and home support services (as defined in section 

9 101(a)(52) of such Act, as added by such subsection). 

10 Such training shall include training for specific specialized 

11 in-home living and home support services in the case of 

12 an independent living assistant who is assisting an adult 

13 with a disability who requires such specific specialized 

14 services.

Æ
Arthel Gerard CHURCH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9867.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                                       0000710507
<NAME>                                First Banks, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                        148,432
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          2,085
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               27,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   442,272 
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         22,650
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           23,376
<LOANS>                                     3,764,408
<ALLOWANCE>                                    65,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4,634,634   
<DEPOSITS>                                  4,064,425
<SHORT-TERM>                                   67,376
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           108,247 
<LONG-TERM>                                   127,486 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    13,063
<COMMON>                                        5,915
<OTHER-SE>                                    248,122 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              4,634,634  
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                74,675
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               7,662
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  223
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               82,560
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             35,948
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             38,966
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          43,594
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   2,490
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                374
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                35,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,220
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     15,220
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    9,271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  383.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  372.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   8.09
<LOANS-NON>                                    45,231
<LOANS-PAST>                                    3,674
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                71,632
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               60,970
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   1,911
<RECOVERIES>                                    2,224
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              65,239
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           50,988
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        14,251
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,786,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,786,576
<PP&E>                                      22,395,185
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,794,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,387,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          682,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,705,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,387,505
<SALES>                                      5,921,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,958,583
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  285,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,672,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,672,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### NOV 2 2004 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
JEFFREY E. STEWART, Petitioner - Appellant, v. REGINALD HINES, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. No. 03-6357 (D.C. No. CIV-02-1752-F) (W.D. Okla)

ORDER
Before EBEL , MURPHY and McCONNELL , Circuit Judges. Petitioner Jeffrey E. Stewart brings a habeas actio n pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging prison disciplinary proceedings for his alleged refusal to cell with an inmate of another race. He received sancti ons of 30 days in disciplinary segregation, forfeiture of 180 days of earned credi ts, and demotion from prison classification level 4 to level 1, which diminishedhis ability to earn additional credits. Before this court, Petitioner asserts due process and equal protection claims, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence against him, the fairness of the prison’s investigation, and the equality of his tre atment as compared to other inmates.- 2 -

The district court, adopting the recommendations of the magistrate judge, denied habeas relief on the merits of these issues in this case. The district court also denied a certificate of appealability (“COA”). A state habeas petitioner seeking a writ pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. § 2241 must obtain a COA before proceeding on appeal. Montez v . McKinna , 208 F.3d 862, 869 (10th Cir. 2000). Petitioner is entitled to a COA only upon making a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutio nal right.” Id. For substantially the same reasons stated in the district court’s ord er and the magistrate judge’s recommendation, we find that Petitioner has not mad e the requisite showing. Accordingly, we DENY COA on all claims and DISMISS this appeal.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

David M. Ebel Circuit Judge
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LILIANA MARTINEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC.,, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cv-00865-RS 

STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Court has been informed that the above-entitled action has settled. Accordingly, the 

Court vacates all pretrial and trial dates. The parties are required to file a stipulation of dismissal 

by May 11, 2017. If a stipulation of dismissal is not filed by that date, the parties are ordered to 

appear on May 18, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor of the San Francisco 

Courthouse and show cause why the case should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with this 

Order may result in dismissal of the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 28, 2017 

______________________________________ 

Richard Seeborg 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:17-cv-00865-RS Document 16 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22600-22601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11209]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 22601]]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings; Agreements filed during the Week Ended 
April 28, 1995

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

Docket Number: 50306
Date filed: April 24, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject: TC12 Telex Mail Vote 736, North Atlantic-Europe Cargo 
Revalidation
Proposed Effective Date: October 1, 1995

Docket Number: 50310
Date filed: April 26, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject: TC3 Telex Mail Vote 741, First Class Fares between Japan and 
Hong Kong
Proposed Effective Date: May 15, 1995

Docket Number: 50316
Date filed: April 24, 1995
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject: TC2 Mail Vote 740, Within Africa Fares, Telex--Technical 
Correction
r-1--071ww r-2--085f
Proposed Effective Date: May 15, 1995
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services Division.
[FR Doc. 95-11209 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF PATENT CLAIMS

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

sf-3802512

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 

DISMISSAL OF PATENT CLAIMS

Judge: The Honorable William Alsup

Trial Date: October 10, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1593 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 4
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF PATENT CLAIMS

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 1

sf-3802512

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff Waymo LLC and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ottomotto LLC, and Otto 

Trucking LLC, through their respective counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AS 

FOLLOWS:

Waymo dismisses its claims for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,368,936, except for its 

claims against the original Fuji firing circuit design, with prejudice; 

Waymo dismisses its claims for infringement of the above-listed patent against the 

original Fuji firing circuit design without prejudice; and

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees with respect to the above claims.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: September 13, 2017 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs

MICHAEL A. JACOBS

Attorneys for Defendants

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and

OTTOMOTTO LLC

Dated: September 13, 2017 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

By: /s/ Neel Chatterjee

NEEL CHATTERJEE

Attorneys for Defendant

OTTO TRUCKING, LLC

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1593 Filed 09/15/17 Page 2 of 4
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF PATENT CLAIMS

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 2

sf-3802512

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: September 13, 2017 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, 

LLP

By: /s/ Charles K. Verhoeven

CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

WAYMO LLC

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ____________, 2017 ___________________________________

 The Honorable William Alsup

September 15

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1593 Filed 09/15/17 Page 3 of 4
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF PATENT CLAIMS

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA 3

sf-3802512

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

I, Charles Verhoeven, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 

Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael Jacobs and 

Neel Chatterjee have concurred in this filing.

Dated: September 13, 2017 /s/ Charles K. Verhoeven

CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1593 Filed 09/15/17 Page 4 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RON FRANKLIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENNIS MALLY,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00789-HSG 

CONDITIONAL ORDER OF 

DISMISSAL 

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, 

that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on 

opposing counsel, within 45 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said 

settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall 

forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. 

Dated: August 6, 2019 

________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W. Mobley,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                  /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Paul W. Mobley
                                  Chief Financial Officer of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                  Date: August 9, 2005
Tavieus T. SIMMONS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 12-9641.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, denied.
Denise Ann GARRETTE, petitioner, v. Pam BONDI, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

No. 12-8465.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21509-21510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10669]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-245-000]

Koch Gateway Pipeline Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

April 26, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 21, 1995, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(KGPC) tendered for to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff Fifth Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective May 4, 
1995:

First Revised Sheet No. 3603
First Revised Sheet No. 3605
First Revised Sheet No. 3606
First Revised Sheet No. 3607
Second Revised Sheet No. 3608
First Revised Sheet No. 3609
First Revised Sheet No. 3610
First Revised Sheet No. 3611

    KGPC states that the above referenced tariff sheets reflect KGPC's 
compliance with the Commission's Final Rule (Order No. 577) issued 
March 29, 1995 at Docket No. RM95-5-000. KGPC states that these tariff 
sheets reflect modifications to KGPC's capacity release provisions to 
reflect the Commission's revision of Section 284.243(h) of its 
Regulations.
    KGPC, pursuant to Section 154.51 of the Commission's Regulations, 
respectfully requests waiver of the notice requirement of Section 
154.22 of said Regulations to permit the tendered tariff sheets to 
become effective May 4, 1995 which is the date Order No. 577 will 
become effective.
    KGPC also states that the revised tariff sheets are being served 
upon all its customers, State Commissions, and other interested 
parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Sections [[Page 21510]] 385.214 and 385.211 
of the Commission's regulations. All such motions or protests should be 
filed on or before May 3, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining appropriate action to be taken, but will not 
serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a Motion to Intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10669 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Order entered September 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01146
- CV
IN RE LOUIS T. SHIEL L II, Relator On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 06516 

### O RDER The Court has before it real party in interest’s September 3, 2013 unopposed motion to extend time to file response. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS real party in interest to file his response by September 16, 2013.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUIFAX –- CHICOINE V PHEAA, NO. 3:17-CV-00926 JST

Page 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark F. Anderson (SBN 44787)

ANDERSON, OGILVIE & BREWER LLP

1736 Stockton Street, Ground Floor

San Francisco, California 94133

Telephone: (415) 651-1951

Fax: (415) 500-8300

Email: mark@aoblawyers.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Heather L. Chicoine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HEATHER L. CHICOINE,

Plaintiff,

v.

PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCTION 

ASSISTANCE AGENCY, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:17-cv-00926 JST

(proposed) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX 

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC

Based on the parties’ stipulation and for good cause shown, plaintiff Heather L. Chicoine’s 

claims against defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC are hereby dismissed with prejudice, 

each party to bear its own fees and costs, pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 41(a)(2). 

Date: 

 

 _____________________________________

United States District Judge

June 12, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00926-JST Document 38 Filed 06/12/17 Page 1 of 1
Loren Daniel BUNNER v. STATE

CR-16-1084

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.