alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                      11,520,200
<SECURITIES>                                74,063,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,377,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,800,700
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,807,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 396,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             287,343,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,829,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,358,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               287,343,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,968,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,625,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,459,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,937,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                590,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                    73,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            517,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   517,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Carbon Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derek
McLeish, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








March 25,
2008




/s/ Derek
McLeish


Derek
McLeish


Chief
Executive Officer and


Acting
Chief Financial Officer
Lazaro URBAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-269

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019. Rehearing Denied June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               RULE 13A-14(B) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Textron Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted
R. French, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


                                    Textron Financial Corporation


                                    /s/ Ted R. French
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Ted R. French
                                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 10, 2004
Kevin Dewayne MOORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL, Unknown.

No. 12-8713.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE 

CR 17-00087 HSG 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973) 

United States Attorney 

BARBARA J. VALLIERE (DCBN 439353) 

Chief, Criminal Division 

JOHN H. HEMANN (CABN 165823) 

KATHERINE L. WAWRZYNIAK (CABN 252751) 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 

San Francisco, California 94102-3495 

Telephone: (415) 436-7317 

FAX: (415) 436-7234 

john.hemann@usdoj.gov 

katherine.wawrzyniak@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MARC TERBEEK, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CR 17-00087 HSG 

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE 

SENTENCING HEARING 

STIPULATION 

1. The above-captioned matter is currently scheduled for a sentencing hearing on Monday, 

October 23, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. 

2. The defendant in the related case United States v. Daniel Rush, CR 15-0454 HSG, is set 

to be sentenced on November 13, 2017. Defendant TerBeek cooperated against Mr. Rush, and it is 

possible that, as part of his cooperation, Mr. TerBeek will be called to testify at the Rush sentencing. 

3. U.S. Probation is still in the process of completing the Presentence Investigation Reports 

(PSRs) for both Mr. TerBeek and Mr. Rush. 

4. Therefore, the parties request and stipulate that Mr. TerBeek’s sentencing hearing be 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULAT

CR 17-000

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

continued

IT

DATED:

 

 

 

 

DATED:

B

captioned

 IT

DATED:

TION AND OR

087 HSG 

d to Monday

T IS SO ST

: September 

: September 

Based on the 

d matter is h

T IS SO ORD

: September 

RDER TO CO

y, November

IPULATED

20, 2017 

 

 

 

 

20, 2017 

parties’ stip

hereby contin

DERED. 

21, 2017 

ONTINUE

r 27, 2017, a

D. 

ulation, and 

nued to Mon

2 

at 2:00 p.m. 

 BRI

 Unit

 

 JOH

KAT

 Assi

 

EDW

AUG

Cou

ORDER

for good ca

nday, Novem

HON

Unit

IAN J. STRE

ted States At

 /s

HN H. HEMA

THERINE L

istant United

 /s

WARD SWA

GUST GUG

unsel for Def

R

ause shown, t

mber 27, 201

NORABLE 

ted States D

ETCH 

ttorney 

s/ 

ANN 

L. WAWRZY

d States Atto

s/ 

ANSON 

GELMANN 

fendant Marc

the sentencin

7, at 2:00 p.

HAYWOOD

istrict Judge

 

YNIAK

orneys 

 

c TerBeek 

ng hearing i

m. 

D S. GILLIA

e

n the aboveAM, JR. -
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00524-CV

Rueben Mendoza

v.

Fort Worth Housing Authority and 

Ameritex Security

§

§

§

§

From the 352nd District Court

of Tarrant County (352-259031-12)

April 4, 2013

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1328 

For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2005 

Ms. CARSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Adela and Darryl Bailor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN LOSSES. 

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

5 pay, not later than 18 months after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, out of funds not otherwise appropriated, 

7 to Adela and Darryl Bailor the amount determined by the 

8 Attorney General under section 2(b). 

9 (b) SETTLEMENT.—The payment of this sum shall 

10 be in full settlement of all claims of Adela and Darryl Bail11 or arising from an incident on May 9, 1991, that is the 
2 

•HR 1328 IH 

1 subject of Case No. 94–2660 in the United States Court 

2 of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. 

3 (c) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Nothing in this 

4 Act shall be construed as an inference of liability on the 

5 part of the United States. 

6 (d) LIMITATION.—No person shall have any claim on 

7 the amount described in this section, whether contractual, 

8 equitable or statutory, except for reasonable attorneys fees 

9 and expenses that do not exceed 10 percent of the amount 

10 paid under subsection (a). 

11 SEC. 2. AMOUNT. 

12 (a) TRANSMITTAL OF CLAIMS.—Not later than 6 

13 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, Adela 

14 and Darryl Bailor, or their representative, shall transmit 

15 to the Attorney General all claims for compensation re16 ferred to in section 1. 

17 (b) DETERMINATION OF THE ATTORNEY GEN18 ERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enact19 ment of this Act, with appropriate consideration given to 

20 the claims transmitted under subsection (a), the Attorney 

21 General shall determine the amount that Adela and Darryl 

22 Bailor shall receive. 

Æ
Chandler P. SMITH, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 12-7255.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Notice Case No. 17-00913 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414) 

AMANDA LOCKHART (State Bar #289900) 

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, 

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

702 Mangrove Avenue, #304 

Chico, CA 95926 

Telephone: (415) 389-8600 

Email: alockhart@disabilitieslaw.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEANETTE BROWN, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SONOMA COUNTY LAND 

COMPANY, et al. 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00913-RMI

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF 

COUNSEL 

To the Court, all Parties, and their attorneys of record: 

Attorney Amanda Lockhart hereby withdraws as counsel for all Plaintiff Jeanette Brown. 

Ms. Lockhart has accepted a position at another firm and will no longer work for The 

Frankovich Group or on behalf of Plaintiff Jeanette Brown. 

 

 

Dated: August 6, 2018 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, APLC 

 A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 

 By: /s/ Amanda Lockhart 

 Amanda Lockhart 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 1:17-cv-00913-RMI Document 38 Filed 08/06/18 Page 1 of 1
NONPARTIES AURORA INNOVATION, INC., CHRISTOPHER URMSON, NURO, INC., AND DAVID FERGUSON’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF AND ACCOMPANYING DECLARATIONS

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00939

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SINGER / BEA LLP

 Benjamin L. Singer (Bar. No. 264295)

 bsinger@singerbea.com

 Walter C. Pfeffer (Bar No. 289421)

 wpfeffer@singerbea.com

601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1950

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 500-6080

Facsimile: (415) 500-6080

Attorneys for Non-Parties Aurora Innovation, Inc., 

Christopher Urmson, Nuro, Inc., and David Ferguson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO TRUCKING 

LLC

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00939

NONPARTIES AURORA INNOVATION, 

INC., CHRISTOPHER URMSON, NURO, 

INC., AND DAVID FERGUSON’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF 

DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF AND 

ACCOMPANYING DECLARATIONS

Date: TBD

Time: TBD

Courtroom: F (15th Floor)

Judge: Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley

Trial Date: October 2, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1240 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2
- 1 -

NONPARTIES AURORA INNOVATION, INC., CHRISTOPHER URMSON, NURO, INC., AND DAVID FERGUSON’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF AND ACCOMPANYING DECLARATIONS

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00939

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, nonparties Aurora Innovation, Inc., Christopher 

Urmson, Nuro, Inc., and David Ferguson (the “Nonparties”) submit this administrative motion for an 

order to file under seal the highlighted Discovery Letter Brief and the accompanying Declaration of 

Christopher Urmson and Declaration of David Ferguson. The highlighted portions of these 

documents contain information that should be designated “Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes 

Only” under the Protective Order in this case. See Declaration of Walter C. Pfeffer in Support of 

Nonparties’ Administrative Motion to Seal Portions of Discovery Letter Brief and Accompanying 

Declarations at ¶¶ 1–3. 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(2), the Nonparties will lodge with the Clerk the 

documents at issue, with accompanying chamber copies. The Nonparties have served all parties 

with this motion on August 17, 2017.

Date: August 17, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

SINGER / BEA LLP

By: 

 

Walter C. Pfeffer

Attorneys for Non-Parties Aurora Innovation, Inc., 

Christopher Urmson, Nuro, Inc., and David Ferguson

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1240 Filed 08/17/17 Page 2 of 2
Brian Keith CARSTEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2487

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10367]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meeting of 
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council, 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, June 1-2, 1995, National 
Institute of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 31, Conference Room 
10, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    The Council meeting will be open to the public on June 1 from 8:30 
a.m. to approximately 3:30 p.m. for discussion of program policies and 
issues. Attendance by the public is limited to space available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C., section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Council meeting will be closed to the public from approximately 3:30 
p.m. to recess on June 1 and from 8:30 a.m. to adjournment on June 2 
for the review, discussion and evaluation of individual grant 
applications. These applications and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Ms. Terry Long, Chief, Communications and Public Information 
Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Building 31, Room 
4A21, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 
496-4236, will provide a summary of the meetings and a roster of the 
Council members.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the Executive Secretary in advance of the meeting.
    Dr. Ronald G. Geller, Executive Secretary, National Heart, Lung, 
and Blood Advisory Council, Rockledge Building (RKL2), Room 7100, 
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 435-
0260, will furnish substantive program information.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10367 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BAMIDELE HAMBOLU, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WASSERMAN-STERN ATTORNEYS, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-mc-80018-PJH 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 

RECONSIDER DETERMINATION TO 

DECLINE TO ACCEPT FILING OF THE 

COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 15

Before the court is pro se plaintiffs Bamidele Hambolu and Lynn Gavin’s “Notice of 

Motion and Motion to Appeal Acceptance of Complaint.” Dkt.15. On February 16, 2017, 

the court declined to accept plaintiffs’ complaint for filing because it asserted claims 

relating to plaintiff Lynn Gavin’s allegedly wrongful eviction from her Parkmerced 

apartment in 2012. Dkt. 13. As a result, the complaint fell within the scope of Judge 

Chen’s January 12, 2016 pre-filing order in a prior action by plaintiff Gavin. See Gavin v. 

City and Cnty. of San Francisco, No. 15-cv-05202-EMC Dkt. 9 at 7.

On February 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed the instant motion to appeal the 

determination not to accept the complaint for filing. Gavin asserts that she “was not 

notified of any decision for a pre-filing requirement.” Dkt. 15. Had she been made aware 

of the pre-filing order, she would have “filed an appeal in a timely manner.” Id.

It is not clear whether plaintiffs’ motion intends to ask this court to reconsider its 

determination not to accept the complaint for filing, or seeks to pursue an appeal to the 

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. To the extent that plaintiffs seek reconsideration of 

this court’s order, the motion is DENIED. Judge Chen’s pre-filing order was duly served 

by mail on plaintiff’s address of record. See 3:15-cv-05202-EMC Dkt. 9-1. Although the 

Case 4:17-mc-80018-PJH Document 18 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

docket indicates that plaintiff may not have received Judge Chen’s order (it was returned 

as undeliverable), this was the result of plaintiff’s failure to maintain an updated mailing 

address as required by the Local Rules. See Civ. L.R. 3-11. Nonetheless, the court will 

attach a copy of Judge Chen’s ruling so that plaintiff is aware of the limitations of the prefiling order.

If plaintiff wishes instead to pursue an appeal to the Ninth Circuit, she will need to 

pay the docketing fee (or seek leave to appeal in forma pauperis), as she has already 

been informed by the Clerk. See Dkt. 16.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2016

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

attachment: Gavin v. City and Cnty. of San Francisco, No. 15-cv-05202-EMC Dkt. 9

(N.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2016)

Case 4:17-mc-80018-PJH Document 18 Filed 03/02/17 Page 2 of 2
毎年、何千人もの女性がHIVに感染

しています。事実を学びましょう。

家族や地域の女性に、HIVの予防と

治療の方法を教えましょう。

HIVとは?

HIVは、エイズを引き起こすウイルスで

す。HIVに感染している人は、HIV陽性(HIV+

)と呼ばれます。HIVは、あなたの体が他の

様々な病気と戦うのを困難にします。

どのようにしてHIVに感染

するのか? 

HHIVは血液、精液、母乳などの体液を介して感染し

ます。

次の場合にHIVに感染する可能性があります:

• HIV +で、コンドームを使用しない人とセックスを

した時。

• HIVに感染している人と針や注射器(薬やドラッ

グ)を共有した時。

• HIVに感染している人から輸血した時。現在、献血

された血液は全て、HIV検査を受けます。血液を提

供することでHIVに感染することはありません。

多くの女性は、男性と無防備なセックスをすること

でHIVに感染します。セックスするときは、必ずコ

ンドームを使用してください。

握手したり、キスしたり、フォークやメガネなどの

家庭にある用品をHIVに感染している人と共有した

りしても、HIVに感染することはありません

誰がHIVに感染しているか

は、どうやって分かりま

すか?

確実に知る唯一の方法は、HIV検査を受けることで

す。

• HIVに感染している人は、見ただけではわかりませ

ん。殆どの人は、HIVに初めて感染しても、見た目

にはすぐに兆候を示しません。 

• 人は病気にみえなくても、HIV感染を広める可能性

があります。

HIV検査の受け方は?

HIV検査には、3つの基本的なタイプがあります。

• 血液 — 少量の血液を、指や腕から採取します。

• 唾液 — 唾液を、口の内側から摂取します。

• 尿 — 小さなカップに、尿を採取します。

HIV検査には、ラボから結果を知らされるのに1〜2週

間かかるものがあります。 「ラピッドHIV検査」と

呼ばれる検査では、約20分で結果が得られます。

医師のオフィス、移動式検査車や、ヘルス・フェア

などで、テストを受けることができます。自分で検

査できる家庭用HIV検査もあります。

女性とHIV

FDA婦人健康部 

www.fda.gov/womens
女性とHIV

このファクトシートは、FDA婦人保健部によって作成されました。

女性特有の他の健康に関しての詳しい情報を入手するには、下記のサイトを訪問してください。

www.fda.gov/womens

2021

「ウィンドウ期間」とは

何ですか?

HIVが検査で確認できるまでに、感染してから数週

間から数ヶ月かかる場合があります。 この期間は

「ウィンドウ期間」と呼ばれます。 

• HIVに感染したばかりの人は、ウイルスに感染し

ていても陽性反応を示さない場合があります。 

• 人は、ウィンドウ期間中に他の人にウイルスを

感染させる可能性があります。

HIVの治療方法はありま

すか?

HIVの治療方法は、ありません。HIVに感染してい

る人が、ウイルスが体内に蓄積して増えるのを防

ぐのに役立つ薬は、あります。

• HIV感染者は、一日3回かそれ以上、薬を服用し

なければならないかもしれません。

• HIV治療薬を服用しないと、時間の経過とともに

重い病気になる可能性があります。

• HIVに感染している人は、医師に相談しないで薬

の服用を止めることは、してはいけません。

FDAはまた、特定の人がHIVに感染する可能性を下

げるために服用できる1種の薬を、承認していま

す。

妊娠中の女性はHIVにつ

いて何を知っておくべ

きか?

女性は、妊娠中、分娩中、または出産中に、HIV

を赤ちゃんに感染させる可能性があります。 女

性は、母乳授乳中にHIVを赤ちゃんに感染させる

こともあります。 

• HIVに感染している女性は、妊娠する前に医師

に相談する必要があります。

• HIVに感染している女性は、薬を服用して赤ち

ゃんにHIVを感染させる可能性を低くすること

ができます。

• HIV薬の一部は、出生異常を引き起こす可能

性があるため、妊娠中は服用しないでくださ

い。

HIVとエイズについてもっと知るには:

AIDS.govにアクセスしてください。

お近くの検査場所を知るには:

1-800-232-4636へ電話するか、郵便番号(ZIPコ

ード)をKNOWIT (566948) にテキストしてくだ

さい。 

女性とHIV (JAPANESE)
マンモグラム

マンモグラムは、乳房の低線量X線

写真です。

何故、必要なのですか?

マンモグラムは、命を救います。

マンモグラムは、現在でも乳癌を発見す

る最良の方法です。自分や医師が感じ

るには小さすぎる乳房のしこりでも、見

つけることができます。

マンモグラムだけで全ての問題を発見す

ることはできません。女性の皆さんは医師

と相談しながら、乳房をチェックする必要

があります。次のような乳房の変化に気づ

いたら、医師や診療所に相談しましょう:

•しこり

• 肥厚

•乳首から液体が漏れている、または乳首

の外観が変化した

マンモグラムはどう行われ

る?

• 上半身の衣服とブラジャーを脱ぎます。

• X線装置の前に立ちます。

• 乳房を小さな台の上に置きます。

• 透明プラスチック板で数秒間、乳房を押し下げ

ます。圧迫を不快に感じる人もいますが、殆どの

人は苦痛には感じません。

• 技師が乳房の写真を何枚か撮ります。

• 最後に、専門医がX線写真を見て、乳房に変化が

ないかどうかを確認します。

結果はどのように知らされ

る?

あなたと担当医は、マンモグラム検診後30日以

内に書面で結果を受け取ります。

• 結果の連絡が無い場合は、電話しましょう。連絡

が無い時は、問題無い、と思い込まないでくださ

い。

• マンモグラムの画像をリクエストしましょう。画

像は、CDに保存できます。将来の画像と比較す

るために、保管しておきましょう。

FDAの役割は?

FDAは、米国内でマンモグラムを提供する検査施

設を認定しています。これは、マンモグラフィ品質

基準法(MQSA)と呼ばれる法律です。

FDAは検査施設と、そこで働く人々を、審査しま

す。 

FDA Ofce of Women’s Health 

www.fda.gov/womens
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES 

PubliC Hcal9h Se"ice 

Food and DU9Adminish

CERTIFIED MAMMOGRAPHY FACILITY 

ょ二こ -‘``‘‘』1H

マンモグラム

検査機関が認定済かど

うかを確認する方法は?

FDAは、下記の全ての認定済マンモグラム

検査機関のリストを持っています:

• 医師のオフィス

• 診療所

• 病院

• X線センター

• 移動検診車

お近くの認定済検査機関を見つけるに

は、FDAのWebサイトにアクセスし、郵便番

号を入力してください:

www.fda.gov/findmammography

また、検診施設にFDA MQSA証明書が

あるかどうかを確認しましょう。

デジタル・マンモグラムと

は何ですか?

デジタル・マンモグラムは、2Dまたは3Dと呼

ばれます。コンピューターおよびX線を使用し

て、乳房の画像を作成し、表示します。これら

の画像は、通常のマンモグラムと同じ方法で

撮影されます。詳細は、検査施設にお問い合

わせください。

マンモグラム検診をする前

に知っておくべきことは?

• 検診当日は脇の下や乳房に制汗剤、香

水、ローション、パウダーを塗らないでくだ

さい。X線に現れる事があります。

• 乳房インプラントをされている場合には、

予約時にクリニックに申し出てください。

通常よりも多くの写真を撮る必要がある

かもしれません。

• 身体に障害があり、座ったり、腕を上げた

り、自分で服を着ることが難しい場合は、

クリニックに伝えてください。また、車椅子

やスクーターを使用している場合も、申し

出てください。

• 宗教上の理由で検査にあたって特別な要

望がある場合には、スタッフにお知らせく

ださい。 

このファクトシートは、FDA女性保健部によって作成されました。

女性の健康に関する他の情報を知るには、以下のURLをアクセスしてください。

www.fda.gov/womens 

マンモグラム (JAPANESE) 2020