alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FOOD & DRUG 

ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

OFFICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY OPERATIONS 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration 

Division of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations I 

10 Waterview Blvd, 3rd FL 

Parsippany, NJ 07054 

Telephone: (973) 331-4900 

FAX: (973) 331-4969 

www.fda.gov 

October 17, 2022 

Marcy Bliss, Chief Executive Officer 

Wedgewood Village Pharmacy, LLC 

405 Heron Dr Ste 200 

Swedesboro, New Jersey 08085 

mbliss@wedgewoodpharmacy.com 

Dear Ms. Bliss: 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed an evaluation of your firm’s corrective 

actions in response to our warning letter [WL# 395218, dated February 21, 2014]. Based on our 

evaluation, it appears that you have adequately addressed the violations contained in this warning letter. 

You are expected to take all necessary steps to ensure compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and 

Cosmetic Act and FDA’s implementing regulations. This letter will not preclude any future regulatory 

action should violations be observed during a subsequent inspection or through other means. 

Sincerely, 

Nerizza Guerin 

Acting Program Division Director/District Director 

Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations 

Division I/New Jersey District Office 

Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations, Division of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations I 

New England District Office: One Montvale Avenue, 4th Floor Stoneham, MA 02180-3500 T- (781) 587-7500 F- (781) 587-7556 

New York District Office: 158-15 Liberty Ave Jamaica, NY 11433 T–(718) 340-7000 F-(718) 662-5661 

Philadelphia District Office: US Customs House Room 900, 200 Chestnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19106 T– (215) 597-4390 F–(215) 597-4660 

Baltimore District Office: 6000 Metro Drive, Suite 101 Baltimore, MD 21215 T-410-779-5455 F- 410-779-5407
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE MEET AND

CONFER ON JUROR

QUESTIONNAIRE

Counsel for both sides shall please MEET AND CONFER over the juror questionnaire used

in Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA (Dkt. No. 1710-1), and agree

on a proposed revision to Question 9 (all of the other questions shall remain the same). Please

file the agreed-upon proposed revision by SEPTEMBER 8 AT NOON.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 5, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1468 Filed 09/05/17 Page 1 of 1
ex10-7.htm


    Exhibit
10.7

     

     

    
       

       

      EXERCISE
OF OPTION TO EXTEND AND

      AMENDMENT
NO. 1

      TO

      CHARTER
PARTY

      DATED
OCTOBER 6, 2005

      (THE
“CHARTERPARTY”)

      BETWEEN

      REGAL
UNITY TANKER CORPORATION (THE “OWNERS”)

      AND

      DHT REGAL
UNITY VLCC CORP. (THE “CHARTERERS”)

      FOR THE
VESSEL

      OVERSEAS
REGAL

       

      Pursuant
to clause 99 of the Charterparty, the Charterers hereby declare, as of November
26, 2008, the exercise of the first 12 months of the option period which shall
commence on 

      April 17,
2011 at 0001 hours GMT and end on April 16, 2012 at 2400 hours GMT (the “Option Period”).

       

      As of the
date of this agreement, the Owners and the Charterers hereby amend the terms of
the Charterparty as follows:

       

      (1)
Notwithstanding clause 99, the rate during the Option Period shall, at the
option of the Charterers, be:

      


      
        
          	 
      	
                  a)

                	
                  usd
      38,100 per day
      during the period from April 17, 2011 at 0001 hours GMT until October 16,
      2011 at 2400 hours GMT and usd 38,500 per day during
      the period from October 17, 2011 at 0001 hours GMT until April 16, 2012 at
      2400 hours; or

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  b)

                	
                  the
      market rate as determined by the Association of Shipbrokers Agents and
      Agents Tanker Broker Panel plus five percent provided, however, that the rate
      payable during the Option Period shall never be less than usd 33,100 per
      day.

                


        

      

       

      (2)
Except as expressly amended by this agreement, the terms and conditions of the
Charterparty remain unchanged and in full force and effect including, without
limitation, the profit sharing arrangement between the Owners and the
Charterers.

       

      
         

        
          January
15, 2009

           

          
            
              
                	For Regal Unity Tanker
      Corporation	 	 	For
      DHT Regal Unity VLCC Corp.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                        By: 
      /s/ Ole Jacob Diesen

                      	 	 	
                        By: 
      /s/ Mats Berglund

                      	 
	
                        Name: 
      Ole Jacob Diesen

                      	 	 	
                        Name: 
      Mats Berglund

                      	 
	
                        Title:   
      Vice President

                      	 	 	
                        Title:   
      Senior Vice President
Frank L. GUTIERREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9152.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BETSY LINN JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 851 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Thomas K. HOGGE, petitioner, v. Harvard STEPHENS, et al.

No. 12-8479.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1394 

To amend the Small Business Act to clarify that the Administrator of the 

Small Business Administration is authorized to make economic injury 

disaster loans in response to disasters caused by drought. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Ms. HOOLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to clarify that the Administrator of the Small Business Administration is authorized to make economic injury disaster loans in response 

to disasters caused by drought. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Admin5 istration Drought Assistance Act’’. 
2 

•HR 1394 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ECONOMIC INJURY LOANS FOR DISASTERS CAUSED 

2 BY DROUGHT. 

3 Section 7(b)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

4 636(b)(2)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(including a 

5 drought)’’ after ‘‘in an area affected by a disaster’’. 

Æ
올바르게 취급하기

“싱크대를 씻고 헹구고 

위생 처리를 하지 않았

습니다.” 

“싱크대를 씻고 헹구고 위

생 처리를 했습니다.” 

어디서든 사람의 건강을 보호하십시오. 도구를 사용하난 후에는 항상 씻고 헹구고 위생 처리를 하십시오.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 24656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11399]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,627]


New Dimensions, Ltd., Providence, Rhode Island and Rosecraft, 
Inc.; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

TA-W-30,627A Providence, Rhode Island
TA-W-30,627B Woonsocket, Rhode Island

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
applicable to all workers of New Dimensions, Ltd., in Providence, Rhode 
Island. The notice was issued on March 3, 1995 and published in the 
Federal Register on March 22, 1995 (60 FR 15163).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers producing costume jewelry at New Dimensions. 
The findings show that both New Dimensions and Rosecraft have the same 
owners and both produce costume jewelry and were in the same building 
in Providence, Rhode Island.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of New Dimensions and Rosecraft, Inc., in Providence, Rhode 
Island and Woonsocket, Rhode Island.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending its certification to 
include workers at Rosecraft, Inc.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,627 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of New Dimensions, Ltd., Providence, Rhode Island 
and Rosecraft, Inc., Providence, Rhode Island and Woonsocket, Rhode 
Island who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
or after December 21, 1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 26th day of April, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-11399 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Michael W. STRAND and Cari Allen, petitioners, v. Glen R. DAWSON.

No. 12-9198.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Kenneth M. SCHWERING, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate on Behalf of Beverly D. Schwering, petitioner, v. TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC., et al.

No. 12-1297.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALEB AVERY TBEAR,

Plaintiff,

v.

BARRY FORMAN,

Defendant.

Case No.17-cv-00796-JSC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On April 5, 2019, the Court issued an order following a case management conference held 

the day before, in which it ordered Plaintiff to, among other things, provide Defendant with all 

documents related to Urso Ltd. and its ownership and assets from 2015 to the present. (Dkt. No. 

161.) Plaintiff indicated at the April 4, 2019 conference that he would provide the requested 

documents. (See Dkt. No. 164 at 7-8.) 

At Defendant’s request, the Court held a scheduled telephone conference on April 18, 2019 

to discuss the status of Plaintiff’s compliance with the April 5, 2019 Order. The Court notified 

Plaintiff of the conference by email and telephone, but Plaintiff failed to appear. Defendant 

appeared and asserted that Plaintiff has not produced all of the ordered documents. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff has until to April 23, 2019 to comply with the Court’s April 5, 2019 

Order and produce all of the requested documents, including documents showing the originally 

purported transfer of interest. If Plaintiff does not produce to Defendant all of the ordered 

documents by that date, he shall file a written submission by the same date, explaining why 

default should not be entered against him as to Defendant’s rescission claim in light of Plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with the Court’s orders. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

April 18, 2019
Michael L. KNIGHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9157.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
出門上班前,問問自己:「今天身體狀況是否良好?」

為維護大眾健康,生病時不上班。
Edmund Orok EDEM, petitioner, v. ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES ENTERPRISE, et al.

No. 12-952.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00939-WHA (JSC)

ORDER RE: UBER’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL WAYMO TO UTILIZE 

CERTAIN SEARCH TERMS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 1081, 1090

1. Emails Regarding Uber: Waymo shall run Uber’s proposed search terms on the 

11 custodians’ outbound email from January 2014 to the present. Uber claims that “[d]iscussions 

of Uber as a competitor, assessments of Uber’s business, and monitoring of Waymo or Google 

employees going to Uber are all highly relevant to this lawsuit.” (Dkt. No. 1081 at 3.) The 

custodians’ outbound email should capture a large portion of the relevant emails and will eliminate 

irrelevant inbound emails such as news feeds and Uber ride receipts. 

2. Project Chauffeur Bonus Program: Waymo shall run Uber’s proposed search 

terms without the “OR valu*” term on the 11 proposed custodians. (Dkt. No. 1081 at 4 (noting 

that Uber had reduced its requested custodians from 28 to 11). Waymo is already producing the 

most relevant documents in response to Uber’s document request, and it has run and did not find 

any emails involving Mr. Levandowski that discuss the bonus program.

Any objections to this Order must be filed with the district court by noon on Wednesday, 

August 9, 2017. The Order is not stayed.

This Order disposes of Docket Nos. 1081, 1090.
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 7, 2017

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10984]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Receipt of Application(s) for Permit

    The following applicant(s) have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.)

PRT-801822

Applicant: Mr. Donald F. Eriacho, Governor, Pueblo of Zuni, New 
Mexico.

    The applicant requests a permit to take (conduct presence/absence 
surveys) for the southwestern willow flycatcher Empidonax trailii 
extimus on Reservation lands in New Mexico for the purpose of 
scientific research and enhancement of propagation and survival of the 
species as prescribed by Service recovery documents.

ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the 
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103, and 
must be received by the Assistant Regional Director within 30 days for 
the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice. (See ADDRESSES above.)
James A. Young,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 95-10984 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Gregory ROLAND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. POLK COUNTY COURTHOUSE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1909

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Do It Right

“| did not wash,
rinse, and sanitize

“Il washed, rinsed, and
sanitized the sink.”

Protect People Everywhere. Always Wash, > &,
Rinse, and Sanitize Equipment Between Uses. ¢ FDA fy
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1236 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, as the ‘‘Mayor Tony Armstrong 

Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Mr. GIBBONS (for himself, Mr. PORTER, and Ms. BERKLEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, as the 

‘‘Mayor Tony Armstrong Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAYOR TONY ARMSTRONG MEMORIAL POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Ne7 vada, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Mayor Tony 

8 Armstrong Memorial Post Office’’. 
2 

•HR 1236 IH 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mayor Tony Arm5 strong Memorial Post Office’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 for May Drilling Partnership  1983-1 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000711308
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1983-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         139
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  66
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205
<PP&E>                                         7,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   444
<SALES>                                        77
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               78
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  36
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                42
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            42
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   42
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  4.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  4.03
        



</TABLE>
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al.

No. 12-760.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Christopher David STRAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3374

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Christina Hatfield, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of J.P. Morgan Mortgage Trust 2007-S3 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. as Servicer, Chase Home Finance
    LLC as Sub-Servicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase
    Bank, N.A. as Named Servicer.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ Christina Hatfield
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)