alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
تصوير الثدي باألشعة

التصوير الشعاعي للثدي هو صورة منخفضة الجرعة باألشعة 

السينية للثدي.

مكتب إدارة الغذاء والدواء األمريكية لصحة املرأة

womens/gov.fda.www

ملاذا يجب أن أخضع لهذه 

اآلشعة؟

ميكن أن يساعد التصوير الشعاعي للثدي يف إنقاذ األرواح.

فهي ال تزال أفضل طريقة لفحص رسطان الثدي. حيث تتمكن

من العثور عىل كتل الثدي عندما تكون صغرية جدا بحيث 

التشعر بها السيدة أو طبيبها.

ال ميكن للتصوير الشعاعي للثدي التحقق من جميع املشاكل. 

لذلك، يجب عىل كل امرأة أن تتابع مع طبيبها للتحقق من 

ثدييها. اتصيل بطبيبك أو العيادة

إذا الحظت أي تغيري يف ثدييك مثل:

• كتلة

• سامكة

• ترسب السائل من الحلمة أو التغيريات يف شكل الحلمة 

كيف يتم إجر اء تصوير 

للثدي باألشعة؟

• سوف تحتاجني إىل خلع قميصك وحاملة الصدر.

• سوف تقفني أمام جهاز األشعة السينية.

• يتم وضع الثدي عىل منصة صغرية.

لوحة بالستيكية تضغط عىل الثدي لبضع ثوان. بعض النساء يقولون أن 

الضغط يشعر بعدم االرتياح، ولكن معظمهن يعتقدن أنه غري مؤمل.

•

• سيقوم التقني بالتقاط عدة صور للثدي.

ثم ينظر أخصايئ يف صور األشعة السينية ملعرفة ما إذا كانت هناك أي 

تغيريات يف الثدي.

• 

كيف ميكنني الحصول عىل نتائجي؟

ميكنك الحصول أنت ومقدم الرعاية الصحية عىل نتائج مكتوبة يف 

غضون 30 يوما بعد تصوير الثدي الشعاعي .

• اتصيل إذا مل تحصيل عىل النتائج. ال تفرتيض أن كل يشء طبيعي.

اطلبي تصوير الثدي الشعاعي الخاص بك. ميكن حفظه عىل قرص 

مضغوط. احتفظي به ملقارنته مع التصوير الشعاعي للثدي الذي 

ستحصلني عليه الحقا.

• 

ماذا تفعل إدارة الغذاء والدواء 

األمريكية؟

تعطي ادارة الغذاء والدواء األمريكية شهادة لألماكن التي تقوم بعمل 

التصوير الشعاعي للثدي يف الواليات املتحدة. إنه قانون يسمى قانون 

معايري جودة التصوير الشعاعي للثدي )MQSA).

وتقوم إدارة الغذاء والدواء بالتحقق من املرافق واألشخاص الذين 

يعملون فيها.
تصوير الثدي الشعاعي

كيف أعرف ما إذا املكان الذي 

سأجري فيه اآلشعة معتمدا؟

تحتفظ إدارة الغذاء والدواء بقامئة بجميع األماكن املصدقة 

حيث ميكنك الحصول عىل تصوير الثدي الشعاعي مثل:

• طبيب

• عيادة

• مستشفى

• مركز األشعة السينية

• شاحنة متنقلة

ملعرفة أقرب مكان لك، زوري موقع إدارة الغذاء والدو اء 

وضعي الكود الربيدي الخاص بك: 

findmammography/gov.fda.www

ما هو تصوير الثدي الشعاعي 

الرقمي؟

يسمى التصوير الشعاعي الرقمي ب D2 أو D3 يستخدم التصوير 

الشعاعي الرقمي للثدي جهاز كمبيوتر مع األشعة السينية لصنع 

صور الثدي وعرضها. تؤخذ هذه الصور بنفس الطريقة التي يؤخذ 

بها تصوير الثدي الشعاعي العادي. اسأيل املؤسسة التي تتعاملني 

معها ملعرفة املزيد.

ماذا يجب أن أعرف أيضا قبل 

أن أخضع لتصوير الثدي باألشعة 

السينية؟

	 ال تضعي مزيل العرق أو العطور أو اللوشن أو املسحوق 

تحت ذراعك أو عىل ثدييك يف يوم الفحص. فقد تظهر عىل 

األشعة السينية.

	 أخربي العيادة إذا كنت قد قمت بزراعة الثدي عند تحديد 

موعدك. قد يحتاجون إىل التقاط صور أكرث من تصوير الثدي 

الشعاعي العادي.

	 أخربي العيادة إذا كنت تعاين من أي إعاقة جسدية قد تجعل 

من الصعب عليك الجلوس أو رفع ذراعيك أو ارتداء مالبسك. 

أيضا، أبلغيهم إذا كنت تستخدمني كريس متحرك .

	 تحديث مع املوظفني حول كيفية التعامل مع بعض التحفظات 

التي قد تكون لديك بسبب ديانتك.

ميكنك أيضا التحقق من شهادة املصادقة من إدارة الغذاء 

والدواء يف املكان الذي ستقصدينه.

تم تحرير هذا العدد من صحيفة الحقائق من قبل مكتب إدارة الغذاء والدواء لصحة املرأة.

للحصول عىل املوارد الصحية األخرى الخاصة باملرأة ، انتقيل إىل:

womens/gov.fda.www

تصوير الثدي الشعاعي )ARABIC )2021
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25216-25217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11620]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


 Clyde Financial Corporation; Notice of Application to Engage de 
novo in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has filed an application under 
Sec.  225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) 
for the Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y 
(12 CFR 225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or 
through a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  
225.25 of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the question whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing on this question 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party [[Page 25217]] commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the 
proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
May 25, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Clyde Financial Corporation, Clyde, Texas; to engage de novo in 
making, acquiring, or servicing loans for itself or for others and loan 
marketing and advisory services pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(1) of the 
Board's Regulation Y. These activities will be performed in Taylor, 
Callahan, Jones, Shackelford, Stevens, Eastland, Comanche, Brown 
Coleman, Erath, Throckmorton, and Runnels Counties, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 5, 1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-11620 Filed 5-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
處理即食食物時穿戴手套或使用餐具,可確保食品安全與客戶健康

 

✘

 



為維護大眾健康,處理即食食物時,請務必穿戴手套或使用餐具。

。
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Marketing Orders for

Marlboro Sienna HeatSticks

Marlboro Bronze HeatSticks

Marketed by Philip Morris Products S.A.

The Center for Tobacco Products of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has carefully considered 

the potential environmental impact of these actions and has concluded that these actions will not have 

significant effects on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, environmental impact 

statements are not required.

Philip Morris Products S.A. wishes to introduce two heated tobacco products (HTP) into interstate 

commerce for commercial distribution in the United States and submitted to FDA two supplemental 

premarket tobacco product applications to obtain marketing orders under the provisions of section 

910(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

The agency prepared a programmatic environmental assessment (PEA), dated April 25, 2022, for the 

two HTPs in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508) 

implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and FDA’s NEPA regulations (21 CFR 25.40)

to support the finding of no significant impact. The evidence supporting this finding is contained in the 

attached PEA, which is available to the public upon request.

The PEA evaluates potential environmental effects due to manufacturing, use, and disposal of the new 

products. No increased or new types of environmental impacts due to manufacturing the new products 

are anticipated. FDA does not foresee that use of the new products would result in new or different 

environmental impacts. FDA believes that the disposal of the new products is the same as the disposal 

conditions of other HTP that are currently marketed in the United States. Therefore, the agency does 

not foresee significant adverse impacts to the environment due to the proposed action as a result of 

manufacturing, use, and disposal of the new products.

Approved by

Luis G. Valerio, Jr., Ph.D., ATS

Associate Director

Division of Nonclinical Science

Office of Science

Center for Tobacco Products

U.S. Food and Drug Administration
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER RE CASE

MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

The Court is concerned that defendants may eventually wish to waive some claims of

privilege in order to bolster their defense — for example, by explaining precautions they may

have taken at the time of Otto’s acquisition to prevent Waymo’s confidential files from

influencing defendants’ LiDAR research and development. To prevent discovery prejudice and

waste of resources, defendants shall file a written statement by JUNE 1 AT NOON setting forth

any waiver of privilege on pain of preclusion thereafter. Waymo may file a response by JUNE 5

AT NOON. This issue shall be discussed at the case management conference, which remains set

for June 7 at 8:00 a.m. This is without prejudice to any argument that certain waivers of

privilege are already too late to avoid discovery prejudice, or that certain claims of privilege

should never have been asserted in the first place. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 15, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 438 Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 1
Marcus L. BROOKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9149.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Lamar WEBSTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9383.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 21, 2011 | By:  | /s/ Yao-Ting Su                                                       |
|----------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |      | Yao-Ting SuChief Executive and Financial Officer(Principal executive and financial officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|                 |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
Richard A. Baker , certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of NRDC Acquisition
Corp.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [Omission in accordance with SEC Release
No. 33-8760] for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
[Omission in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8760];




(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      April 4, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      RICHARD A. BAKERRichard
      A. BakerChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LIL' MAN IN THE BOAT, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 17-cv-00904-JST (SK) 

NOTICE OF REFERRAL FOR 

DISCOVERY 

Re: Dkt. No. 92 

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim for discovery. The parties must 

comply with the Standing Order for Magistrate Judge Kim, which is attached and available on the 

Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/sk. 

The parties are advised that the Court will only address discovery disputes that are 

presented by a joint letter brief in compliance with the Court’s Standing Order after the parties 

have meet and conferred. If the parties filed a discovery motion brief before this matter was 

referred to the undersigned, the motion is HEREBY DENIED without prejudice. If the parties 

filed a joint letter brief, within three days from issuance of this Notice the parties shall file a joint 

statement verifying that they have complied with the meet and confer requirement of the Standing 

Order, prior to filing the letter. In the absence of such a statement, the request made through the 

joint letter brief is HEREBY DENIED without prejudice to filing a joint letter in compliance with 

the Court’s Standing Order. 

/// 

/// 

/// 
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Please contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk Melinda Lozenski at (415) 522-4158 with any 

questions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 16, 2019 

______________________________________ 

SALLIE KIM 

United States Magistrate Judge
Tracy GARRETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10034.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arbor Entech Corporation (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Brad Houtkin, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.    March 7, 2011   /s/  Brad Houtkin Brad Houtkin Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1261

To amend the National Trails System Act to improve the efficiency and 

fairness of acquiring railroad rights-of-way for interim use as public 

trails by applying the procedures applicable to other Federal real estate 

acquisitions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2005

Mr. RYUN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the National Trails System Act to improve the 

efficiency and fairness of acquiring railroad rights-ofway for interim use as public trails by applying the 

procedures applicable to other Federal real estate acquisitions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY 

4 FOR INTERIM USE AS PUBLIC TRAILS. 

5 (a) FAIR ACQUISITION PROCEDURES.—Section 8(d) 

6 of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1247(d)) 

7 is amended—
2

•HR 1261 IH 

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(d)’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

3 paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(2) In the case of any donation, transfer, lease, sale, 

5 or other conveyance of a railroad right-of-way for interim 

6 use described in paragraph (1), the interim use of the 

7 right-of-way shall not begin until the payment or deposit 

8 of compensation to each of the owners of the land under9 lying the right-of-way has been made—

10 ‘‘(A) in accordance with—

11 ‘‘(i) section 301 of the Uniform Relocation 

12 Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Poli13 cies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4651); and 

14 ‘‘(ii) sections 3113 and 3114 of title 40, 

15 United States Code; or 

16 ‘‘(B) pursuant to the order of a court of com17 petent jurisdiction in a condemnation proceeding 

18 consistent with such sections.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (2) of section 

20 8(d) of the National Trails System Act, as added by sub21 section (a), shall apply only to the interim use of railroad 

22 rights-of-way pursuant to donations, transfers, leases, 

23 sales, or other conveyances described in such section that 
3

•HR 1261 IH 

1 are entered into on or after the date of the enactment of 

2 this Act.

Æ
ITEM 6. (A)

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
            (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR NET INCOME PER SHARE)


                                                               SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                   JUNE 30,
                                                              ------------------
                                                                2002      2001
                                                              --------  --------
Net income                                                    $ 21,022  $ 15,897
Less:  Preferred stock dividends                                    82        83
                                                              --------  --------
Net income applicable to common stock                         $ 20,940  $ 15,814

Weighted average common shares outstanding-
  basic and diluted                                            921,226   935,407

Net income per common share-basic and diluted                 $  22.73  $  16.91


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT INDIANA 

FORT WAYNE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. CAUSE NO.: 1:12-CR-88-TLS 

PEDRO GARZA 

OPINION AND ORDER 

The Defendant, Pedro Garza, seeks permission from this Court to proceed under 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 [ECF No. 179]. The Defendant’s previous Motion to Correct Sentence Under 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 [ECF No. 165] was withdrawn when the Defendant determined that it would be 

futile for him to continue with his collateral attack after the Supreme Court decided, in Beckles v. 

United States, 137 S. Ct. 886 (2017), that the United States Sentencing Guidelines are not subject 

to due process vagueness challenges. 

The Defendant may not file a second or successive habeas petitions unless he first obtains 

certification to do so from the court of appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) (providing that a 

“second or successive motion must be certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the 

appropriate court of appeals”); Holt v. United States, 843 F.3d 720, 723 (7th Cir. 2016) (stating 

that “Section 2255(h) permits a court of appeals to authorize a successive collateral attack” 

(emphasis added)); Harris v. Cotton, 296 F.3d 578, 579 (7th Cir. 2002) (noting that it is the court 

of appeals rather than that of the district court that must grant the permission to file a second or 

successive petition for habeas corpus); see also Vitrano v. United States, 643 F.3d 229, 233 (7th 

Cir. 2011) (“A § 2255 motion need not be adjudicated on the merits to ‘count’ as a prisoner’s 

first motion for AEDPA purposes.”) (citing Felder v. McVicar, 113 F.3d 696, 698 (7th Cir. 

1997)). 
2 

Based on the foregoing, the Motions seeking permission from this Court [ECF No. 177 

(Spanish version), ECF No. 179 (English version)] are DISMISSED as filed in the wrong court. 

SO ORDERED on December 10, 2018. 

 s/ Theresa L. Springmann 

CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT