alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1











CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER


OF PIONEER SOUTHWEST ENERGY
PARTNERS L.P.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §
1350








I, Scott D. Sheffield, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Natural Resources GP LLC, the general partner
of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"), hereby certify
that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Partnership
fully complies with the requirements of that section.





I further certify that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership.








/s/
      Scott D. SheffieldName:
            Scott
      D. Sheffield, Chairman andChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
            February
      26, 2010
Commodore JACKSON, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 12-8547.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection
with the Report of Seven Arts Entertainment, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: November 9, 2012 | By: | /s/ Peter Hoffman                  | 
|---------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------- | 
|                       |     | Peter Hoffman                      | 
|                       |     | Chairman of the Board of Directors | 





|Date: November 9, 2012 | By: | /s/ Peter Hoffman       | 
|---------------------- | --- | ----------------------- | 
|                       |     | Peter Hoffman           | 
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer | 





|Date: November 9, 2012 | By: | /s/ Elaine New          | 
|---------------------- | --- | ----------------------- | 
|                       |     | Elaine New              | 
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer | 





|Date: November 9, 2012 | By: | /s/ Elaine New               | 
|---------------------- | --- | ---------------------------- | 
|                       |     | Elaine New                   | 
|                       |     | Principal Accounting Officer | 



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6842** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
TERRY LEE ROSEBORO , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:00

- cr - 00014

- RLV

- 1 )

Submitted : July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Terry Lee Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; H. Thomas Church, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, DC; C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlo tte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Terry Lee Roseboro appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Roseboro , No. 5:00

- cr - 00014

- RLV

- 1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the fact s and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT B

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 203-2 Filed 04/10/17 Page 1 of 2
Product Guide

Features HDL-64 HDL-32 VLP-16

Channels 64 32 16

Range 100-120 m 80-100 m 100 m

Accuracy +/- 2cm +/- 2cm +/- 3cm

Data Distance / 

Intensity

Data Rate 1.3M pts/sec 700,000 pts/sec 300,000 pts/sec

Vertical FOV 26.8o 40o 30o

Input Voltage

(with interface box and regulated power supply) 10-32 VDC 9-32 VDC 9-32 VDC

Power 60W 12W 8W

Environmental IP67 IP67 IP67

Operating Temperature -10o to 50o C -10o to 60o C -10o to 60o C

Size 203mm x 284mm (~8” x ~11”) 86mm x 145mm (~3.6” x ~6”) 104mm x 72mm (~4” x ~3”)

Weight 15kg (33lbs) 1kg (2.2lbs) 0.83kg (1.8lbs)

Distance / Calibrated

Reflectivities

Distance / Calibrated

Reflectivities

Vertical Resolution ~ 0.4o ~ 1.3o ~ 2.0o

Horizontal Resolution

 5Hz: 0.08o

10Hz: 0.17o

20Hz: 0.35o

 5Hz: 0.08o

10Hz: 0.17o

20Hz: 0.35o

 5Hz: 0.1o

10Hz: 0.2o

 20Hz: 0.4o

www.velodynelidar.com

(~11”)

284mm

203mm (~8”)

(~6”)

145mm

86mm (~8”)

(~3”)

72mm

72mm (~4”)

Horizontal FOV 360o 360o 360o

www.velodynelidar.com Email: lidar@velodyne.com Phone: 408 465 2800 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 203-2 Filed 04/10/17 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

BRIAN BICKHAM,

Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN RONALD J. DAVIS,

Respondent.

Case No. 1:17-00912 NJV

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE 

TO PETITION

Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254. He is represented by counsel and has paid the $5.00 filing fee. It does not appear 

from the face of the petition that it is without merit. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby 

issues the following orders:

1. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and the petition and all 

attachments thereto upon Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State 

of California. 

2. Respondent shall file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60) 

days of the issuance of this Order, an Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules 

Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued. 

Respondent shall file with the Answer a copy of all portions of the relevant state records that have 

been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the 

petition. 

3. If Petitioner wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do so by filing a Traverse 

with the Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty (30) days of his receipt of the Answer. 

Case 1:17-cv-00912-NJV Document 7 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Should Petitioner fail to do so, the petition will be deemed submitted and ready for decision thirty 

(30) days after the date Petitioner is served with Respondent's Answer. 

4. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an 

Answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 

2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on 

Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion within thirty (30) days of 

receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply 

within fifteen (15) days of receipt of any opposition.

5. Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be granted. 

Any motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than ten (10) days prior to the deadline 

sought to be extended.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2017

______________________________________

NANDOR J. VADAS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:17-cv-00912-NJV Document 7 Filed 03/20/17 Page 2 of 2
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1236 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, as the 

‘‘Mayor Tony Armstrong Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 1236 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, shall be known 

4 and designated as the ‘‘Mayor Tony Armstrong Memorial 

5 Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Mayor Tony Armstrong Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, RonHooper, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust, for which Bankof America, N.A. acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 7, 2012
Gloria DUNN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8149.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Appendix 1 

Procedures for Requesting Speakers from FDA/CBER for Meetings, 

Conferences, Panels, Workshops, etc. 

Where to Send Requests 

Email: cberspeakerliaison@fda.hhs.gov 

Mail: 

FDA/Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research 

Office of Communication Outreach and Development 

Division of Manufacturers Assistance and Technical Training 

ATTN: CBER Speaker Liaison 

Document Control Center 

10903 New Hampshire Avenue 

WO71, G112Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 

Fax: 301-827-3079 

NOTE: If the event also includes invitations to staff from the Office of the Commissioner, other FDA 

centers or the Office of Regulatory Affairs, the request should be addressed to: 

FDA Office of External Affairs 

10903 New Hampshire Avenue 

Bldg. 32 Room 5314 

Silver Spring, MD 20993 

Email: FDASpeaks@fda.hhs.gov 

FAX Number: 301-595-7932 

What to Include in Your Request/Invitation 

• Meeting organizer(s) 

• Topic of meeting and topic of speaker presentation 

• Location of meeting 

• Targeted audience and expected number of attendees 

• Draft agenda naming all speakers invited and topics 

• Is the conference/meeting co-sponsored by regulated industry? 
• Other information particular to this event 

Additionally, any invitation offering monetary reimbursement for CBER personnel participation 

must contain the following paragraphs: 

None of the funds that will be used to support these travel costs come from any federal grants, 

contracts with the Department of Health and Human Services, or regulated industry or trade 

associations. 

We further understand FDA's requirements that costs of employee travel accommodations may not 

be subsidized in any way, and assure that we will comply with that 

Any room charges that are arranged for FDA employees by our organization will not be less than the 

hotel would normally charge to the traveling public, with the sole exception of volume discounts 

made available to us by the hotel. Our organization will not otherwise arrange for or make any 

additional payments to the hotel to defray room costs for FDA employees. 

If any of the above assurances cannot be made, the letter of invitation should give a specific 

statement of explanation. 

What Happens After Your Request Has Been Submitted 

DMAT Staff will contact the appropriate office(s) within CBER, and work with the requesters to

provide the support most acceptable to all parties. Some of the factors which may be used by

Center management in considering requests are: timeliness of the topic, geographical location,

targeted audience, availability of staff, and funding availability. Once a determination has been

made, DMAT will provide the official notification of CBER participation to sponsoring organizations.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

COMMERCIAL WATER AND MOLD, LLC, a/a/o FLORENCE BELL,

Appellant,

v.

SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-274

[July 29, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Robert W. Lee, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. COCE17-23681 

and CACE20-8162.

Asher Perlin of Law Office of Asher Perlin, Hollywood, for appellant.

Patrick M. Chidnese of Bickford & Chidnese, LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 131 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 131

 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to reform 
  funding for the Seniors Farmers' Market Nutrition Program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

  Ms. Kaptur (for herself, Mr. Walsh, Mr. Boehlert, Ms. Bordallo, Ms. 
 DeLauro, Mr. Farr, Mr. Hinchey, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Ms. Kilpatrick of 
 Michigan, Mr. Kind, Ms. Lee, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Payne, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
 Serrano, Ms. Slaughter, and Mr. Towns) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to reform 
  funding for the Seniors Farmers' Market Nutrition Program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENIORS FARMERS' MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM.

    (a) Funding.--Subsection (a) of section 4402 of the Farm Security 
and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007; Public Law 107-171; 
116 Stat. 334) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall use funds 
available to the Commodity Credit Corporation to carry out and expand a 
seniors farmers' market nutrition program in the following amounts:
            ``(1) For fiscal year 2005, not less than $25,000,000.
            ``(2) For fiscal year 2006, not less than $50,000,000.
            ``(3) For fiscal year 2007, not less than $75,000,000.''.
    (b) Purposes.--Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended--
            (1) by striking ``unprepared'' and inserting ``minimally 
        processed''; and
            (2) by striking ``and herbs'' and inserting ``herbs, and 
        other locally produced farm products as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate''.
    (c) Administrative Costs; Unexpended Funds.--Such section is 
further amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:
    ``(d) Administrative Costs.--Not more than 10 percent of the funds 
made available for a fiscal year under subsection (a) may be used to 
pay administrative costs incurred in carrying out this section.
    ``(e) Unexpended Funds.--To the extent the funds made available 
under subsection (a) for a fiscal year are not expended in that fiscal 
year, the Secretary shall use such funds in a subsequent fiscal year 
for the same purpose.''.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 104 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in state 

of the remains of Ralph Puckett, Jr., the last Medal of Honor recipient 

for acts performed during the Korean conflict. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2024 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia (for himself, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. 

KHANNA, Mr. RYAN, Mr. ALFORD, and Ms. GRANGER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the 

lying in state of the remains of Ralph Puckett, Jr., 

the last Medal of Honor recipient for acts performed 

during the Korean conflict. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST MEDAL OF HONOR RE4 CIPIENT OF THE KOREAN CONFLICT. 

5 (a) USE OF ROTUNDA.—In recognition of Army Colo6 nel Ralph Puckett, Jr., the last recipient of the Medal of 

7 Honor for acts performed during the Korean conflict, his 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 104 IH 

1 remains shall be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda 

2 of the Capitol on April 29, 2024, in order to honor the 

3 Silent Generation and the more than 5,700,000 men and 

4 women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 

5 States during the ‘‘Forgotten War’’ from 1950 to 1953. 

6 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Architect of the Capitol, 

7 under the direction of the Speaker of the House of Rep8 resentatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, 

9 shall take all necessary steps to carry out this section. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCA MORALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIAMOND K SUPPLY, LTD., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00678-WHO 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON 

SETTLEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 32

The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have 

agreed to a settlement. 

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings 

scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, 

with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement 

has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for 

further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 11, 2017

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge