alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 2, 2020

NO. 03-19-00522-CV

Tilana Toney, Appellant

v.

Steve Strickland, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the final order signed by the trial court on July 3, 2019. Having reviewed 

the record, the Court holds that Tilana Toney has not prosecuted her appeal and did not comply 

with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of 

prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the 

court below.
Johnny ONEGA, petitioner, v. William LEE, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

No. 12-9561.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 25 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR A CERE4 MONY AS PART OF THE COMMEMORATION OF 

5 THE DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE OF VICTIMS OF 

6 THE HOLOCAUST. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

8 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on April 
2 

•HCON 25 EH 

1 20, 2023, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration 

2 of the days of remembrance of victims of the 

3 Holocaust. 

4 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

5 ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out 

6 in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the 

7 Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 

2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 25 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

of victims of the Holocaust. the commemoration of the days of remembrance Capitol Visitor Center for a ceremony as part of
Jimmy FELICIANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10019.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*2756Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21 - 0497 CHAPPELL HOLDINGS LLC, Pl aint iff and Counterclaim Defendant / Appellant, vs. FRANK BOONE and KELLY BOONE , Defendants and Counterclaim Pl aint iffs / Appellee. **ORDER OF DISMISSAL**

ERIC A. MISNER and SHANA D. EAGLEFEATHERS, Pl aint iffs / Appellee, vs. FRANK R. BOONE, III, KELLY A. BOONE, and PURE REAL ESTATE, LLC, Defendants/ Appellee. FRANK R. BOONE, III and KELLY A. BOONE, Counterclaim Plaint iffs / Appellee, vs. ERIC A. MISNER and SHANA D. EAGLEFEATHERS, Counterclaim Defendants/ Appellee. FRANK R. BOONE, III and KELLY A. BOONE, Cross - cl aim

Plaint iffs /A

ppellee , vs. PURE REAL ESTATE, LLC, Cross - cl aim

Defendants /A

ppellee . 11/04/2021
Case Number: DA 21-04972

ERIC A. MISNER and SHANA D. EAGLEFEATHERS, Cross - cl aim

Plaint iffs /A

ppellee , vs. CHAPPELL HOLDINGS LLC, Cross - cl aim

Defendant /Appellant . A STIPULATION TO DISMISS having been filed in this matter, and for good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case and appeal is dismissed with prejudice, as fully and finally settled on the merits, with each party to bear thei

r own costs and attorney

f ees. DATED thi s ____ day

of November , 2021.

____________________________________ Montana Supreme Court Justice

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 4 2021
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                     STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                                            Nine months ended
                                                            September 30, 2000
                                                            ------------------

Income before income taxes and distributions on
   preferred securities                                          $135,458
                                                                 --------

Fixed Charges:

Interest on debt                                                  247,390

Estimated interest portion of rents                                 1,419
                                                                 --------
Total fixed charges                                               248,809

                                                                 --------
Adjusted Income                                                   384,267

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                  1.54x
                                                                 ========


The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities and fixed charges
by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental
expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
**[Deloitte Logo]******Deloitte & Touche LLP Suite 3300 1100 Walnut Street  Kansas City, MO 64106-2129 USA Tel: +1 816 474 6180 www.deloitte.com  **REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**Board of Directors The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.: We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, Inc., (the "Company"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for its role in servicing Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities Transactions (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)((B), (C) and (D)), 1122(d)3(ii) through 3(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management's assertion identifies the transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each specific asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, for its role in servicing Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities Transactions is fairly stated, in all material respects. / s /   D e l o i t t e   &   T o u c h e   L L P  K a n s a s   C i t y ,   M O    February 18, 2008
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of SunSi Energies Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the
undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
August 30, 2010





By:
            /s/
      Michel LaporteName:
            Michel
      LaporteTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer
Get other women’s health information

www.fda.gov/womens

Learn more about hair products

www.fda.gov/cosmetics

Hair Dyes 

and 

relaxers

Follow these steps:

•

•

•

Call your healthcare provider to find out how to 

take care of the problem.

www.fda.gov/medwatch/report.htm 

or 1-800-332-1088.

Bad Reaction?

teLL Fda.

Most hair dyes do not need to be tested or 

approved by FDa before they are sold. FDa does 

monitor the safety of hair dyes and relaxers. Tell 

FDa if you have itchy or raw skin, scabs, hair loss, 

or other problems after using these products.
7

Tips

To Keep 

You safe

Hair dye is used to color your hair. Hair 

relaxers are used to make your hair 

straight. Both hair dye and hair relaxers 

can hurt you if you are not careful. 

Get the facts before using hair dyes 

and hair relaxers.

1 Follow all directions in the package.

2 Do a patch test on your skin before using dye 

on your hair. rub a small amount of dye on 

your skin. let it dry for 48 hours. if you get a 

rash, do not use the dye on your hair. 

4 Do not dye your eyebrows or eyelashes. This 

can hurt your eyes. you might even go blind.

5 Do not leave the product on longer than the 

directions say you should.

6 

7 Keep hair dyes and relaxers out the reach of children.

3 Wear gloves when applying hair dye or relaxers.
EXHIBIT 102 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 248-15 Filed 04/21/17 Page 1 of 3
Amy Craig, Counsel

Phone: (510) 548-3600 

Fax: (510) 291-3060 

amy@ramsey-ehrlich.com

803 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley CA 94710 · www.ramsey-ehrlich.com · 510.548.3600 · 510.291.3060 fax

April 19, 2017 

VIA EMAIL (PDF) AND FEDEX 

Jordan Jaffe 

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Phone: (415) 875-6600 

jordanjaffe@quinnemanuel.com 

Re: Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. 

 

Dear Mr. Jaffe: 

 I write on behalf of our client, non-party Anthony Levandowski. In response to the 

subpoena to Mr. Levandowski dated April 9, 2017, please find enclosed a CD containing 

documents bates numbered LEV_000001 to LEV_00857. This production constitutes our first 

rolling production of electronic documents. We continue to review documents and will produce 

any additional non-privileged documents, to the extent we identify any. 

In keeping with the protective order governing discovery in this matter, we have 

designated certain documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” and others as “HIGHLY 

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 

By this production, Mr. Levandowski does not intend to produce privileged documents 

or waive any applicable privilege or work product protection. Any inadvertent production of 

such information is protected by Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 248-15 Filed 04/21/17 Page 2 of 3
 Letter to Jordan Jaffe 

Re: Waymo v. Uber, et al.

April 19, 2017 

Page 2 of 2 

803 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley CA 94710 · www.ramsey-ehrlich.com · (510) 548-3600 · (510) 291-3060 fax

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (510) 548-3600. 

Kind regards, 

/s/ Amy Craig 

Miles Ehrlich 

Ismail Ramsey 

Amy E. Craig 

Counsel to Anthony Levandowski 

Encl. 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 248-15 Filed 04/21/17 Page 3 of 3
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT 

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust,certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 

ARGENT TRUST COMPANY,

TRUSTEE
FOR SABINE ROYALTY TRUSTBy: /s/ Nancy WillisNancy WillisVice President
Date: November 7, 2023 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine RoyaltyTrust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10967]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM95-11-29-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

April 28, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 25, 1995, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (TGPL) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Fifth Revised Sheet 
No. 28B to which tariff sheet is proposed to be effective April 1, 
1995.
    TGPL states that the purpose of the instant filing is to track a 
rate change attributable to storage service purchased from North Penn 
Gas Company (North Penn) under its Rate Schedule SS the costs of which 
are included in the rates and charges payable under TGPL's Rate 
Schedule SS-1. The tracking filing is being made pursuant to Section 5 
of TGPL's Rate Schedule SS-1.
    TGPL states that included in Appendix A attached to the filing is 
an explanation of the rate change and details regarding the computation 
of the revised SS-1 rates.
    TGPL states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each of 
its SS-1 customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before May 5, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10967 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ORDER FOR RELEASE 17-cr-00085-JST-1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

USA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LAGRONE, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cr-00085-JST-1 (LB) 

ORDER RECALLING ARREST 

WARRANT 

The defendant appeared before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. The court 

withdraws the warrant in the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 7, 2020 ______________________________________ 

LAUREL BEELER 

United States Magistrate Judge 

FILED 

SUSANY. SOONG 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND Dec 07 2020

Case 4:17-cr-00085-JST Document 9 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10934]



[[Page 22071]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

[CA-050-05-1610-00]


Availability of an Environmental Assessment and Proposed Arcata 
Resource Management Plan Amendment for the Lacks Creek, Red Mountain, 
Covelo and Scattered Tracts Management Areas

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Bureau of Land 
Management has available the Environmental Assessment which proposes to 
amend the existing Arcata Resource Management Plan. The Plan 
specifically addresses four management areas (MAS): Lacks Creek, Red 
Mountain, Covelo, and Scattered Tracts. These MAS encompass 
approximately 122,400 acres of public land located within the northern 
California counties of Humboldt, Mendocino, Trinity and Sonoma. This 
notice is furnished to inform the public of the document's availability 
and the notice of a 30-day public comment period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynda J. Roush, Area Manager, at Bureau of Land Management, Arcata 
Resource Area, 1695 Heindon Road, Arcata CA 95521-4573. Telephone: 
(707) 825-2300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment was prepared in 
accordance with the requirements set forth in the Code of Federal 
Regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-5) to amend the Arcata Resource Area 
Management Plan.
    The issues and concerns addressed in the environmental assessment 
focus on key land use management changes. The scope of this plan 
amendment is limited to a review of decisions related to forest 
management and land tenure adjustment in the four MAS listed above.
    The environmental assessment is available to the public for review. 
Availability has also been published in local and county newspapers. 
There will be a 30-day comment period beginning approximately April 28, 
1995 and ending approximately May 30, 1995. Public comments must be in 
writing and mailed to the above address.
Lynda J. Roush,
Arcata Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-10934 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.

9255 Sunset Blvd., Suite 804

Los Angeles, California 90069

CLARKSON LAW FIRM, P.C.

Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 257074)

rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com

Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN 237882)

sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com

Bahar Sodaify (SBN 289730)

bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com

9255 Sunset Blvd., Ste. 804

Los Angeles, CA 90069

Tel: (213) 788-4050

Fax: (213) 788-4070

Attorneys for Plaintiff Thomas Iglesias 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS IGLESIAS, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FERRARA CANDY CO., and DOES 1 

through 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:17-cv-00849-VC

[CLASS ACTION]

PROOF OF SERVICE

Hon. Judge Vince Chabbria

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 71-1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Clarkson Law Firm, P.C.

9255 Sunset Blvd., Suite 804

Los Angeles, California 90069

PROOF OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I am employed in the County of LOS ANGELES, State of CALIFORNIA. I am over the age of 

18 and not a party to within action; my business address is 9255 Sunset Blvd., Suite 804, Los Angeles, 

CA 90069.

On May 10, 2018, I served the foregoing documents described as:

• SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

on interested parties in this action by sending a true copy of the document to the following parties as 

follows:

HOGAN LOVELLS LLP

Michael J. Shepard

Michael.shepard@hoganlovells.com

3 Embarcadero Center., Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94111

Tel: (415) 374-2310

Fax: (415) 374-2499

HOGAN LOVELLS LLP

J. Christopher Mitchell

chris.mitchell@hoganlovells.com

80 South Eighth Street, Suite 1225

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

Tel: (612) 402-3000

Fax: (612) 339-5167

 X (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE) I caused the document(s) to be sent to the offices of the 

addressees via CM/ECF Service.

 (BY US MAIL) I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid, to be placed in 

the United States mail at Los Angeles, California, pursuant to California Code of Civil 

Procedure § 1013(a). I am readily familiar with this business’ practice for collecting and 

processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for 

collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States 

Postal Service.

 (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) I caused the document(s) to be successfully transmitted via 

electronic mail to the offices of the addressees.

Executed on May 10, 2018, at Los Angeles, California.

 (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

above is true and correct.

 X (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at 

whose direction the service was made. 

 

 Stephanie Satow

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 71-1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 2 of 2
Scott Alan HUMINSKI, petitioner, v. MERCY GILBERT MEDICAL CENTER, et al.

No. 12-8700.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Thomas RICHARDSON, petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 12-9089.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.