alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 7

EXHIBIT 7

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1333-8 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 4
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

4

5 WAYMO LLC,

6 Plaintiff,

7 vs. Case No.

8 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

9 OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC,

10 Defendants.

11 __________________________________/

12

13

14

15 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BRENT SCHWARZ

16 TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 2017

17

18

19

20 Reported by:

21 Anrae Wimberley

22 CSR No. 7778

23 Job No. 2680988

24

25 PAGES 1 - 296

Page 1

Veritext Legal Solutions

866 299-5127

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1333-8 Filed 08/24/17 Page 2 of 4
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

4

5 WAYMO LLC,

6 Plaintiff,

7 vs. Case No.

8 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

9 OTTOMOTTO LLC; OTTO TRUCKING LLC,

10 Defendants.

11 __________________________________/

12

13

14

15 Videotaped Deposition of BRENT SCHWARZ,

16 taken at Quinn Emanuel, 50 CaliforniaStreet,

17 22nd Floor, San Francisco, California 94111,

18 beginning at 9:12 a.m. and ending at 7:02 p.m. on

19 Tuesday, August 15, 2017, before Anrae Wimberley,

20 Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 7778.

21

22

23

24

25

Page 2

Veritext Legal Solutions

866 299-5127

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1333-8 Filed 08/24/17 Page 3 of 4
1 A. I believe he gave -- I had arranged to sell a 09:57:55

2 bunch of sensors to Chris Urmson and Bryan Salesky, 09:57:59

3 and they didn't need the crates, and so he wanted to 09:58:04

4 return the crates. 09:58:04

5 And so I met him on the back dock at Velodyne 09:58:08

6 to receive the wood crates. 09:58:10

7 Q. What year was that? 09:58:13

8 A. It was probably 2011. 09:58:16

9 Q. Were these Velodyne 64s? 09:58:19

10 A. Yes. 09:58:19

11 Q. And how many were there, do you remember? 09:58:23

12 A. I don't recall. It was more than three, 09:58:27

13 because they're kind of big. They wouldn't fit into a 09:58:29

14 -- you couldn't get too many of them into a car. 09:58:33

15 Q. So -- so Mr. Urmson and Mr. Salesky had 09:58:38

16 purchased some Velodyne 64 sensors from Velodyne, but 09:58:42

17 they didn't want the crates that they came in? 09:58:47

18 A. I didn't talk to them about that. I worked 09:58:50

19 it with them exclusively to get the 10 sensors that 09:58:53

20 they wanted acquired. 09:58:54

21 So I worked very closely with them -- 09:58:57

22 prepping them for their meeting with Dave Hall, and I 09:59:00

23 anticipated that would be a very prickly conversation. 09:59:04

24 And so I actually had two phone calls with 09:59:06

25 them to say, "Look. This is how he's going to try to 09:59:09

Page 45

Veritext Legal Solutions

866 299-5127

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1333-8 Filed 08/24/17 Page 4 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING COUNSEL TO BRING ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT INTO

FEDERAL COURTHOUSE FOR USE AT TRIAL — C 05 1858 (MHP) (PR) 1

SILVANO B. MARCHESI (SBN 42965)

County Counsel

MONIKA L. COOPER (SBN 193729)

Deputy County Counsel

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

651 Pine Street, 9th Floor

Martinez, California 94553

Telephone: (925) 335-1800

Facsimile: (925) 335-1866

Electronic mail: mcoop@cc.cccounty.us

Attorneys for Defendant MARK JOHNSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZAMEER RIAZ AZAM

Plaintiff,

v. 

OFFICER M. JOHNSON, SAN RAMON

POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

No. C 05 1858 (MHP) (PR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING

COUNSEL TO BRING ELECTRONIC

EQUIPMENT INTO FEDERAL

COURTHOUSE FOR USE AT TRIAL

Good Cause Appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for defendant Mark

Johnson, including counsel’s support staff assisting such counsel, may bring the following

equipment into the courthouse for use at trial: laptop computers; projector, screen and network

equipment.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date:_____________________ ___________________________________________

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Judge

Feb. 17, 2009

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:05-cv-01858-MHP Document 119 Filed 02/17/09 Page 1 of 1
เอกสารน ีจ้ ดั ทําโดยสํานกั งานสขุ ภาพสตร ี (Office of 

Woman’s Health -OWH) สํานกงานคณะกรรมการ

อาหารและยา (Food and Drugs 

Administration-FDA) และสมาคมรา้ นขายยาแหง่ ชาต ิ 

(National Association of Chain Drug 

Stores-NACDS).

ั

ประมาณ30% ถง 50% ของผ ท ใชยาไม

ได ้ใช ้ตามแพทย์สั ่ง ทาํ ให ้ต ้องมาหาหมอบ่อย

ข น พกรกษาตวในโรงพยาบาลบอยข น สญ

เส ยี คา่ จา้ งและตอ้ งเปล ีย่ นใบสัง่ ยา ทั ง้ หมด

น ีน้ ับเป น็ ค่าใชจ้ ่ายของชาวอเมรกิ ัน

มากกวา 1 แสนลานดอลลาห ในแตละป

ึ ู้ ี่ ้ ่

ึ ้ ั ั ั ่ ึ ้ ู

่ ้ ์ ่ ี

ผ ู้ใหญม่ กั จะเป น็ ผ ู้ให ้ยาสาํ หรบั คนทั ง้

ครอบครวั รวมทั ง้ ตนเอง ดงนั ั นเ้ ราตอ้ งอา่ น

ฉลากยา หลกี เล ีย่ งปญั หาตา่ งๆ ถามคาถํ าม

ท ีส่ งสยั และจดบนั ทกึ

1. อ่านฉลากยา 

กอ่ นท ีค่ ณุ จะใชยา้ ใดๆใหอ้ า่ นฉลากยา ฉลาก

ยาควรแสดง:

สว่ นประกอบตวยั าสําคญั - หากทา่ นทราบ

ว่าท่านแพส้ ว่ นประกอบใดในยา อย่าใชย้ า

นั น้ สอบถามแพทยห์ รอื เภสชกั รของทา่ น

เพ ื่อรบั ยาอ ื่น

คําเต ือน - อา่ นฉลากยาอยา่ งละเอยี ด

วันหมดอายุ - อย่าใช้ยาหลังวันหมดอายุที่ ระบุบนขวด ยาอาจเสื่อมประสิทธิภาพแล้ว

ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับยาของท่าน

กรุณาถามเภสัชกรของท่าน

2. หลีกเลี่ยงปัญหา

ยาอาจทาํ ใหเ้ กดิ ปญั หาหรอื ผลขา้ งเคยี งเชน่

งวงนอนอาเจยน ม เลอดออก ปวดศ รษะ 

หรอื ผ ืน่ ถามเก ีย่ วกบั ผลขา้ งเคยี งของยาท ี่

ทานไดรบ ปรกษาแพทย์ เภสชกรหรอ

พยาบาลท ี่ใหก้ ารดแู ลทา่ น

่ ี ี ื ี

่ ้ ั ึ ั ื

จดั ยาของทาน่ ใหเร้ ยบี รอ้ ย

ไม่ล ืมทานยา

ไมแ่ บง่ ยาของทา่ นกบั ใคร

ไมร่ บปั ระทานยาในท ีม่ ดื

ใช้ยาอย่างมีวิจารญาณ 

เพื่อตัวท่านเอง ...เพื่อคนที่ต้องการท่าน

ใส่ใจให้เวลา

สํานักงานสุขภาพสตรี 

www.fda.gov/womens

เพื่อตัวท่าน

ใส่ใจให้เวลา ...และคนที่ต้องการท่าน

Tiempo Para Cuidar

Su Salud

ยาของฉัน
3. ถามคําถามที่สงสัย

• ยาช ออะไร? ื่ 

• ม ีช ื่อสามัญหรอื ไม่?

• ฉนั กนิ ยาน ีท้ ําไม?

• ฉนั ควรใชย้ าน ีเ้ ม ือ่ ไหร?่

• ฉนั ควรรบั ประทานยาน ี ้ในขณะทอ้ งวา่ งหรอื

พรอ้ มอาหาร?

• การด ืม่ แอลกอฮอลด์ ว้ ยจะปลอดภยั หรอื ไม?่

• ถาฉ้ นั ลมื รบั ประทานยา ฉนั ควรทําอยา่ งไร?

• ฉนั ตอ้ งรบั ประมานยาปร มิ าณเทา่ ไหร?่

• ฉนั ตอ้ งรบปั ระทานยาน ี ้ นานเทา่ ไหร?่

• ฉนตองระวงผลขางเคยงอะไรบาง ? ั ้ ั ้ ี ้

หากทานกาลํ งั ตั งค้ รรภห์ รอื ดแู ลลทารก กรณุ าขอคาํ แนะ

นาํ จากผ ูเ้ ช ีย่ วชาญดา้ นสขุ ภาพหรอื พยาบาลกอ่ นใชยา้

หรออาหารเสร มใดๆ ปรกษาแพทย์ เภสชกรหรอ

พยาบาลท ใหการดแลทาน เธอ / เขาย นดท จะชวย

คุณ

ื ิ ึ ั ื ี่ ้ ู ่ ิ ี ี่ ่

แสดงรายการ อาการแพ้ ใด ๆ

แพทย์ 

หมายเลขโทรศัพท์ 

4. เก็บบันทึกยาที่ท่านใช้

กาเครื่องหมายลงในกล่องหน้ายาที่ท่านใช้:

Aspirin หรือยาอื่นที่บรรเทาอาการเจ็บปวด

/ปวดศีรษะ/ไข้

ยาแก้แพ้ 

ยาลดกรด

ยาแก้หวัด

ยาแก้ไอ

ยาลดความอ้วน/อาหารเสริม

ยาระบาย

ยานอนหลับ

วิตามิน

แร่ธาตุต่างๆ 

ยาสมุนไพร

อื่นๆ 

เก็บใบนี้ว้ในกระเป๋าเงินหรือกระเป๋าของท่าน และนําให้แพทย์ เภสัชกร หรือพยาบาลของท่าน

ชื่อ: 

รายการยาตามใบสั่งแพทย์ของท่าน

วันที่ ชื่อยา ปริมาณยาที่รับประ

ทาน

เวลารับประทานยา ยารักษาอะไร ยาสํารอง

(เติมยา)

ตัวอย่าง XXXX 1 เม็ด

400 มก.

3 ครั้งต่องวัน

หลังอาหาร โรคข้ออักเสบ 2

ให้แพทย์เภสัชกรหรือพยาบาลของท่าน รายงานปัญหาด้านการใช้ยาที่ร้ายแรงต่อ FDA ที่ 1-800-FDA-1088.
#### Juan Manuel SANCHEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70975.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*517Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 28, 2004.

Arielle N. Bases, Esq., Law Office of Arielle Bases, Encino, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, John C. Cunningham, Esq., Cindy S. Ferrier, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Manuel Sanchez and Julia Sanchez, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss in part, and deny in part, the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review whether petitioners have demonstrated the requisite “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” for cancellation of removal. *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 891 (9th Cir.2003).

To the extent petitioners contend that the BIA denied them due process by streamlining their case in light of the new standard for “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” announced in *Matter of Monreal-Aguinaga,*23 I. *&*N. Dec. 56, 2001 WL 534295 (BIA 2001), this argument does not raise a colorable due process challenge. *See Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267, 1270-71 (9th Cir.2001) (“To be colorable ... the claim must have some possible validity”); *Ortiz v. INS,*179 F.3d 1148, 1153 (9th Cir.1999) (“Due process challenges to deportation proceedings require a showing of prejudice to succeed”).

Petitioners contend that the IJ violated due process through her management of their immigration proceedings. To prevail in their due process challenge, they must show error and substantial prejudice. *See Larita-Martinez v. INS,*220 F.3d 1092, 1095 (9th Cir.2000). Because they cannot show substantial prejudice, their due process claim fails. *Id.*

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part, DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Edward EASTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9844.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 133 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 133

                  To increase the maximum Pell Grant.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

  Mr. Keller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  To increase the maximum Pell Grant.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pell Grant Increase Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. MAXIMUM PELL GRANT INCREASE.

     Paragraph (2)(A) of section 401(b) of the Higher Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(b)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2)(A) The amount of the Federal Pell Grant for a student 
eligible under this part shall be $6,000 for academic years 2005-2006 
through 2010-2011, less an amount equal to the amount determined to be 
the expected family contribution with respect to that student for that 
year.''.
                                 <all>
```
Rodney Lamont ALLEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9601.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the Form 10-K Annual Report of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas R. Reeg           
|                     |  |     |  | Thomas R. Reeg               
|                     |  |     |  | Operating Manager            
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
CINTAS CORPORATION, petitioner, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.

No. 12M119.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2013.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 40101 Conference Calendar

United States of America, Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Edgar Efrain Hernandez

- Valenzuela, Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19

- CR

- 937

- 1

Before Graves, Willett, and Duncan, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
The attorney appointed to represent Edgar Efrain Hernandez

Valenzuela has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez

- Valenzuela has not filed a

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 29, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40101 Document: 00515919678 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2021No. 20

- 40101

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brie f and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from fu rther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2

. Case: 20-40101 Document: 00515919678 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/29/2021
Dated:  3/27/2008                                                                       By: /s/   E. Todd Whittemore                                                                 Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Lehman XS Trust, Series 2007-16N (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications**(Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)Name:In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as ServicerLaSalle Bank National Association, as CustodianNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and CustodianWestlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-1485]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Benuvia Operations, LLC has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
                        **Supplementary Information**
                         listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants, therefore, may submit electronic comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before April 14, 2025. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before April 14, 2025.
 ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Please go to 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*
                         and follow the online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously available for public view on 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov.*
                         If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on December 4, 2024, Benuvia Operations, LLC, 3950 North 
                    ( print page 9554)
                    Mays Street, Round Rock, Texas 78665, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug 
                             code
ScheduleFentanyl-Related Substance
9850
IAmphetamine
1100
IILisdexamfetamine
1205
II
 The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled substances for internal research and dosage formulation development. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Matthew Strait, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2025-02593 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
EX-35.4
(logo) ING
REAL ESTATE
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

March 24, 2008

Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.
Eleven Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10010
Attention: Edmund Taylor
Cc: Casey McCutcheon, Esq.
Compliance Department, telecopy no:
(212) 325-8282
Wachovia Bank, National Association
NC 1075 9th Floor
201 S. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28244-1067
Attention: Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities
Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2007-C4
Telecopy number: (704) 715-0036

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045-1951
Attention: Corporate Trust Services
(CMBS)- Credit Suisse First Boston
Series 2007-C4

Re: Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage
    Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C4

Dear Sir or Madam:

This Officer's Certificate is provided to you by ING Clarion Partners, LLC
("Clarion") pursuant to Section 12.11 of that certain Pooling and Servicing
Agreement ("PSA") dated as of Septemeber 1, 2007 relative to the above
referenced securitization for which Clarion acts as Special Servicer.
Capitalized terms used herein shall bear the meaning ascribed to them in the
PSA unless otherwise defined in this letter.

The undersigned officer, on behalf of Clarion, hereby informs you that (i) a
review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under
this Agreement, has been made under such officer's supervision, (ii) to the
best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer
has fulfilled all of its material obligations under this Agreement in all
material respects throughout such preceding calendar year or portion thereof or,
if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
respect, each such failure know to the officer and the nature and status thereof
are set forth below, and (iii) the Special Servicer has received no notice
regarding qualification, or challenging the status, of any REMIC formed
pursuant to the Agreement from the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.

Sincerely,


ING Clarion Partners, LLC
A New York limited liability company,
its authorized agent



By: /s/ Bruce G. Morrison
Bruce G. Morrison
Authorized Signatory
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 79 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 79

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of the Secretary 
                             of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2021

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of the Secretary 
                             of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives be notified of the 
election of the Honorable Sonceria Ann Berry as Secretary of the 
Senate.
                                 <all>
```
Sherrod WHITAKER, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 12-9286.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.