alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CROWD FUND INVESTMENT GROUP 

LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JON LEWIS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:17-cv-02377-KAW 

JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR THE 

PURPOSES OF DETERMINING 

RELATIONSHIP

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled case is hereby REFERRED to the 

Honorable Edward M. Chen for consideration of whether the case is related to Crowd Fund 

Investment Group LLC v. Lewis, et al., 17-cv-00803-EMC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2017

______________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10822]



[[Page 22335]]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[UT11-1-6726b, UT12-1-6727b and UT13-1-6746b; FRL-5184-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Utah; New Source Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the EPA is proposing approval of revisions 
to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) pertaining to the State of 
Utah's new source review (NSR) regulations, which were submitted by the 
Governor of Utah on November 12, 1993 and June 27, 1994. EPA is also 
proposing approval of revisions to the State's definition of volatile 
organic compounds, which was submitted by the Governor of Utah on May 
20, 1994. In the final rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA 
is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without 
prior proposal because the Agency views this submittal as 
noncontroversial and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed 
rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no 
adverse comments are received in response to this proposed rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to this rule. If the EPA 
receives adverse comments, then the direct final rule will be withdrawn 
and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent 
final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a 
second comment period on this notice. Any parties interested in 
commenting on this document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by 
June 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Vicki Stamper, 8ART-
AP, at the EPA Regional Office listed below. Copies of the documents 
relevant to this proposed rule are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours at the following locations: Air Programs 
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th Street, 
suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466; and Division of Air Quality, 
Utah Department of Environmental Quality, PO Box 144820, 150 North 1950 
West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicki Stamper, 8ART-AP, Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th Street, suite 500, Denver, 
Colorado 80202-2466, (303) 293-1765.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the direct 
final rule of the same title which is located in the rules section of 
this Federal Register.

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Robert L. Duprey,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-10822 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Axcess International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined Exchange Act
Rules 13-15(f) and 15d-(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidating
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report was prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
Evaluation Date); andc)
    
    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 6.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  /s/ ALLAN L. FRANKAllan L. Frank, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 2174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-277]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Standard Federal Savings, FSA Gaithersburg, MD: Notice of 
Appointment of Receiver

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
Sec. 5(d)(2) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision has duly appointed the Resolution Trust Corporation as sole 
Receiver for Standard, Federal Savings, FSA, Gaithersburg, Maryland, on 
November 18, 1994.

    Dated: December 30, 1994.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Kimberly M. White,
Corporate Technician.
[FR Doc. 94-277 Filed 1-5-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
```
David B. PORTEE, petitioner, v. J. ALVARADO, et al.

No. 12-8695.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7211
MULLIE D. CRENSHAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BISHOP ROBINSON; RICHARD LANHAM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-2313-JFM) Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 7, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mullie D. Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Maryland inmate, app eals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Crenshaw v. Robinson , No. CA-97-2313-JFM (D. Md. July 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ORA LEARNED TRAINING SYSTEM GLOSSARY CROSSWALK FOR LEARNERS

ORA LEARNED TRAINING SYSTEM 

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK: FOR LEARNERS

To help you transition from the former Pathlore Terms to the new ORA LearnED Learning

Management System Terms, the below Glossary Crosswalk Table has been provided to assist you. 

Pathlore LMS Terminology ORA LearnED Terminology

OTED Pathlore Learning Center ORA LearnED 

Course Event 

Class Session/Parts 

Type of Course Learning Object 

Online Content Online Class 

Course Catalog Search Learning Search 

Self-Reported Training External Training 

My Profile Universal Profile 

Pathlore Account Request Form Self-Registration 

Personal Training Calendar Events Calendar 

Self-Nominate Request 

Registration Status: 

 Finished 

 Enrolled 

Registration Status: 

 Completed 

 Registered 

` 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
INCLUDED IN PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         $37,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,659
<PP&E>                                          11,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,742
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,400
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,903
<SALES>                                         39,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,483
<CGS>                                           24,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,017
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.



BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR SABINE ROYALTY TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper Senior Vice President, Royalty Management


Date: August 7, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to April 26, 2022)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

None Available

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
Dorothy RAGAB, petitioner, v. Rose I. FLYNN.

No. 12-8455.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         I,  Allen H.  Blake,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of First
Banks,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),   certify,   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)   The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of the  Company  for  the
               quarterly  period  ended  March  31,  2006 (the  "Report")  fully
               complies with the  requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  May 12, 2006

                                           By: /s/ Allen H. Blake
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   Allen H. Blake
                                                   President and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1100]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-122-000]


Trunkline Gas Company; Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

January 11, 1995.
    Take notice that on January 6, 1995, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, proposed to 
become effective February 1, 1995.

First Revised Sheet No. 166

    Trunkline states that this filing is being made to modify Section 
3.1(B) of the General Terms and Conditions to reflect a shortened 
deadline for timely nominations of no later than 8:00 a.m. on the third 
business day prior to the first day of the month for nominations 
submitted through the LINK System and no later than 12:00 p.m. on the 
fourth business day prior to the first day of the month for nominations 
submitted in writing.
    Trunkline states that copies of this filing have been served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before January 19, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-1100 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO

CIVIL MINUTES

Case No.: 17-cv-00223-RS (JCS)

Case Name: Securities And Exchange Commission v. San Francisco Regional Center LLC

Date: December 21, 2017 Time: 2 H 30 M

Deputy Clerk: Karen Hom Court Reporter: 1:30-1:35

Attorney for Plaintiff: Andrew Hefty, Susan LaMarca, Thomas Eme, Ellen Chen

Attorney for Defendant: Gil Serrota, Joseph Farris for Dft Henderson; Elizabeth BerkeDreyfuss for Susan Uecker, Receiver

PROCEEDINGS

( ) Settlement Conference

( ) Case Settled ( ) Case Did Not Settle ( ) Partial Settlement

( X ) Further Settlement Conference - Held

(X) Case Settled ( ) Case Did Not Settle ( ) Partial Settlement

( ) Telephonic Scheduling Conference to set Settlement Conference

( ) Further Telephonic Settlement Conference

( ) Discovery Conference – Lead Trial Counsel Meet and Confer 

( ) Status Conference

( ) Other

Notes: Agreement reached in principle. Parties to draft Consent Decree. Telephone conference 

set for 2/1/18 at 9:00 AM. Conference call information was provided to the parties. 

cc:

*Telephonic Appearance

Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 292 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 1
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 810 

Designating the week of October 2, 2022, through October 8, 2022, as 

‘‘National Community Policing Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Mr. CORNYN, Ms. HASSAN, and Mr. PETERS) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 28, 2022 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of October 2, 2022, through October 

8, 2022, as ‘‘National Community Policing Week’’. 

Whereas police officers are indispensable members of the 

community who put their lives on the line to protect others; 

Whereas promoting strong relationships founded in trust and 

mutual respect between law enforcement officers and the 

communities they serve helps ensure the safe and effective execution of the law; 

Whereas relationships developed through community policing 

help protect both law enforcement officers and civilians; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 810 ATS 

Whereas law enforcement officers and communities that work 

together to address public safety concerns can create lasting solutions to difficult challenges; 

Whereas community policing has helped produce reductions 

in both violent and property crime; 

Whereas events in recent years have sparked a nationwide 

call to improve the interactions between law enforcement 

officers and the communities they serve, particularly communities of color; 

Whereas community policing facilitates peaceful dialogue, capable of fostering understanding and trust, between law 

enforcement officers and civilians; 

Whereas community policing informs the public about the 

challenges that law enforcement officers face in executing 

their duties and provides law enforcement officers insight 

into the concerns of community members; 

Whereas a long-term commitment to community policing is 

necessary to eliminate the underlying causes of crime; 

Whereas the advancement of community policing should be 

supported to ensure that State and local law enforcement 

agencies have necessary resources; and 

Whereas community policing has been recognized as an important tool for improving the relationship between law 

enforcement officers and the communities they serve: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of October 2, 2022, 

3 through October 8, 2022, as ‘‘National Community 

4 Policing Week’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 810 ATS 

1 (2) supports community policing and encour2 ages the people of the United States, law enforce3 ment agencies, and elected officials to identify ways 

4 in which communities can improve public safety, 

5 strengthen relationships, and build trust. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Delfino Cardenas MACHADO, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-8537.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.