alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)**

**OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Scandium International Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| Dated: April 28, 2022 |   | /s/Harry de Jonge             |   |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Harry de Jonge                |   |
|                  |   | Comptroller                   |   |
|                  |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
Christian ENG, et al., petitioners, v. The PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

No. 12-769.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

*1725Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EX-33.3
MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE
WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

March 6, 2008

SunTrust Bank (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance
with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i),
229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Code of Federal Regulations
(the "CFR") (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"), for securitization
transactions serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. occurring after December 31,
2005 (the "Platform"). The Asserting Party is not assessing compliance with any
other criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the CFR.

The Asserting Party used the applicable criteria in paragraph (d) of Title 17,
Section 229.1122 of the CFR to assess compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.

The Asserting Party has concluded that it has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve month
period ending December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period").

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.


SUNTRUST BANK
Solely with respect to Sections 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii)


By: /s/ Rosealma T. Burton
Name: Rosealma T. Burton
Title: First Vice President


SUNTRUST BANK
Solely with respect to Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i)


By: /s/ Tomas E. Suarez
Name: Tomas E. Suarez
Title: Group Vice President
1

ANTHONY LEVANDOWSKI’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MILES EHRLICH (Bar No. 237954)

miles@ramsey-ehrlich.com

ISMAIL RAMSEY (Bar No. 189820)

izzy@ramsey-ehrlich.com

AMY CRAIG (Bar No. 269339)

amy@ramsey-ehrlich.com

RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP

803 Hearst Avenue

Berkeley, CA 94710

(510) 548-3600 (Tel)

(510) 291-3060 (Fax)

Attorneys for Non-Party Anthony Levandowski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

ANTHONY LEVANDOWSKI’S 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 213 Filed 04/11/17 Page 1 of 2
2

ANTHONY LEVANDOWSKI’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Notice is hereby given that Anthony Levandowski, intervenor in the above-captioned 

case, appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the district 

court’s order denying Mr. Levandowski’s motion to modify the court’s expedited discovery 

order entered in this action on April 10, 2017. (Dkt. No. 202). 

Date: April 11, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Ismail Ramsey

Miles Ehrlich

Ismail Ramsey

Amy Craig

Ramsey & Ehrlich LLP

803 Hearst Avenue

Berkeley, CA 94710

Tel: (510) 548-3600

Fax: (510) 291-3060

miles@ramsey-ehrlich.com

izzy@ramsey-ehrlich.com

amy@ramsey-ehrlich.com

Counsel for Intervenor Anthony 

Levandowski

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 213 Filed 04/11/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         334,234
<SECURITIES>                                       000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                       000
<INVENTORY>                                        000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               397,200
<PP&E>                                       8,855,238
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,024,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,228,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,770
<BONDS>                                      6,328,343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              000
<PREFERRED>                                        000
<COMMON>                                           000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,247,962)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,228,151
<SALES>                                        341,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               345,036
<CGS>                                              000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               118,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    000
<CHANGES>                                          000
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,034)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.93)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Southwest Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 6, 2015
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

E-filed 3/1/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

JOSE TRUJILLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARMANDO PEREZ GARCIA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00137-HRL 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 

SETTLEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 10

The court has been informed that plaintiff has settled with defendants Armando Perez 

Garcia, Jose De Jesus Perez Garcia, and Francisco Ramos, all d/b/a Taqueria Los Grullenses.

On or before April 4, 2017, plaintiff shall file a notice of dismissal or a stipulated dismissal

as to these three defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). If a dismissal is not filed by the 

specified date, then the parties shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the United States District 

Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California on April 18, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. and show 

cause, if any, why the three aforementioned defendants should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(a). Additionally, the parties shall file a statement in response to this Order to Show 

Cause no later than April 4, 2017, advising as to (1) the status of the activities of the parties in 

finalizing settlement; and (2) how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the 

settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause 

hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a statement in response to this 

Case 5:17-cv-00137-HRL Document 11 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 3/1/2017

Howard R. Lloyd

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00137-HRL Document 11 Filed 03/01/17 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1382

To provide for a one-year delay in the implementation of the voluntary 

prescription drug benefit program, and to provide for a one-year extension of the Medicare prescription drug discount card and transitional 

assistance program and of the coverage of prescription drugs under 

the Medicaid Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005

Mr. FLAKE (for himself, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PAUL, Mr. TANCREDO, and Mr. JONES of North 

Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To provide for a one-year delay in the implementation of 

the voluntary prescription drug benefit program, and to 

provide for a one-year extension of the Medicare prescription drug discount card and transitional assistance program and of the coverage of prescription drugs under 

the Medicaid Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1382 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prescription Drug 

3 COST (Control Overspending to Save Taxpayers) Con4 tainment Act of 2005’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ONE-YEAR DELAY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 

6 THE VOLUNTARY PRESCRIPTION DRUG BEN7 EFIT PROGRAM. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec9 retary of Health and Human Services shall provide for a 

10 one-year delay in the enrollment of individuals in prescrip11 tion drug plans and MA–PD plans under title XVIII of 

12 the Social Security Act. In effecting such delay, the Sec13 retary shall provide for an appropriate delay in contracts 

14 with such plans and in open enrollment periods. 

15 SEC. 3. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF THE MEDICARE PRE16 SCRIPTION DRUG DISCOUNT CARD AND 

17 TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM; CON18 TINUATION OF MEDICAID PRESCRIPTION 

19 DRUG BENEFITS. 

20 (a) CONTINUATION OF DRUG DISCOUNT CARD PRO21 GRAM.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

22 Secretary of Health and Human Services shall continue 

23 to provide for the medicare prescription drug discount 

24 card and transitional assistance program under subpart 

25 4 of part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act during 
3

•HR 1382 IH 

1 2006 under the same terms and conditions that apply dur2 ing 2005. 

3 (b) CONTINUATION OF MEDICAID COVERAGE OF

4 PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.—Notwithstanding any other pro5 vision of law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

6 shall continue to provide for coverage of prescription drugs 

7 under the medicaid program during 2006 under section 

8 1927 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8) 

9 under the same terms and conditions that apply during 

10 2005.

Æ
EX-24 6 ex24.htm EXHIBIT 24


Exhibit 24





RESOLUTION


BOARD OF DIRECTORS


FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.


HAMMOND, LOUISIANA


MARCH 18, 2011








The following resolution was introduced, seconded and unanimously adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc., Hammond, Louisiana, held on the 18th day of March 2011, whereby a quorum was present and voting.





* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *





BE IT RESOLVED that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the holding company are, and each of them hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed to prepare an Annual Report to Stockholders to be mailed to Stockholders of the holding company.





FURTHER RESOLVED that Chief Executive Officer Alton B. Lewis and the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Eric J. Dosch, be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and directed to execute on behalf of any director or officer of the holding company, the Annual Report on Form 10-K, those persons to act pursuant to powers of attorney granted to them by those directors or officers, and to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Annual Report on Form 10-K.





* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *





CERTIFICATE





I hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. at a regular meeting held at its domicile on the 18th day of March 2011, at which a quorum was present and voting and that the same has not been rescinded or revoked.





/s/Eric J. Dosch


Eric J. Dosch


Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and


Secretary to the Board of Directors


First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.


S E A L





/s/Marshall T. Reynolds


Marshall T.  Reynolds


Chairman of the Board of Directors


First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EIMER STAHL LLP 

Nathan P. Eimer 

neimer@eimerstahl.com 

Brian Y. Chang (SBN 287757) 

bchang@eimerstahl.com 

224 South Michigan Avenue 

Suite 1100 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Phone: (312) 660-7600 

Fax: (312) 692-1718 

Attorneys for LG Electronics, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 5:17-CV-00220-LHK-NMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION OF LG ELECTRONICS, INC. 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS 

AMICUS CURIAE 

IN OPPOSITION TO QUALCOMM’S 

MOTION TO STAY THE JUDGMENT 

PENDING APPEAL 

 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1505 Filed 06/12/19 Page 1 of 2
 

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF LG ELECTRONICS, INC. FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE 

Case No. 5:17-CV-00220-LHK-NMC 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LG Electronics, Inc. (“LGE”) has filed a Motion for Leave to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae in 

Opposition to Qualcomm’s Motion to Stay the Judgment Pending Appeal. Having reviewed the 

Motion and Amicus Curiae Brief, and for good cause showing, the Court hereby GRANTS 

LGE’s Motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: June ___, 2019. 

____________________________ 

LUCY H. KOH 

United States District Court Judge 

12

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1505 Filed 06/12/19 Page 2 of 2
Erlinda DOMINGUEZ, petitioner, v. Roy CHANG, et al.

No. 12-1042.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1420 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1420

  To prohibit as indecent the broadcasting of any advertisement for a 
         medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2005

     Mr. Moran of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Ross) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit as indecent the broadcasting of any advertisement for a 
         medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Families for ED Advertising Decency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF INDECENCY.

    Within 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Federal Communications Commission shall revise the Commission's 
interpretations of, and enforcement policies concerning, section 
73.3999 of the Commission's regulations (47 CFR 73.3999), relating to 
indecent material that no licensee of a radio or television broadcast 
station shall broadcast on any day between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., to treat 
as indecent for such purposes any advertisement for a medication for 
the treatment of erectile dysfunction. This section shall not require 
treating as indecent any product placement or other display or mention 
merely of the trademarked name or generic name for such a medication.
                                 <all>
```
Munawar TOHA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3466

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 20, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cornell JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3508

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: The State of Texas v. Gleannloch Commercial Development, LP

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 0 0 427

- CV

Trial court case number: 1041442

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

Appellant the State of Texas has filed a motion for rehearing and a motion for rehearing en

banc

. The Court requests a response to the motion for rehearing and to the motion for rehearing

en banc from appell ee Gleannloch Commercial Development, LP

. The response must be filed no

later than 5:00 p.m., 2 0 days from the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.2.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 1 8 , 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

egale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

jangelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 100

Roseville, California 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

VICTOR VAZQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 3:17-CV-00424-RS

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT 

CARFINANCE CAPITAL, LLC

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF 

CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Victor Vazquez, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant CarFinance Capital, LLC as to all 

claims in this action, with prejudice.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

41(a) Voluntary Dismissal 

(1) By the Plaintiff

(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any 

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court 

Case 3:17-cv-00424-RS Document 31 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT 

order by filing: 

a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a 

motion for summary judgment. 

Defendant CarFinance Capital, LLC has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed a 

motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed against it for all 

purposes and without an Order of the Court. 

Dated: June 16, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C. 

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Victor Vazquez

Case 3:17-cv-00424-RS Document 31 Filed 06/16/17 Page 2 of 2