alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6416

MARVIN LOVEJOY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus RICHARD CATHCART, State Attorney; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina; DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel for the South Carolina Department of Corrections; JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-04-22155-8-24BI) Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 4, 2005 Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin Lovejoy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Marvin Lovejoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lovejoy v. Cathcart , No. CA-04-22155-8-24BI (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc., for the year ending December 31, 2008, I, Eduard Korsinsky , Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1.    Such yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.    The information contained in such yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc.   Date: March 30, 2009/s/ Eduard KorsinskyEDUARD KORSINSKY
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer
and duly authorized officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10444]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-701 (Final)]


Disposable Lighters From Thailand

Determination

    On the basis of the record<SUP>1 developed in the subject 
investigation, the Commission determines,<SUP>2 pursuant to section 
735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that 
an industry in the United States is not materially injured or 
threatened with material injury, and the establishment of an industry 
in the United States is not materially retarded, by reason of imports 
from Thailand of disposable pocket lighters, provided for in 
subheadings 9613.10.00 and 9613.20.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States, that have been found by the Department of 
Commerce to be sold in the United States at less than fair value 
(LTFV).

    \1\The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec. 207.2(f)).
    \2\Commissioners Rohr and Newquist dissenting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this investigation effective October 24, 
1994, following a preliminary determination by the Department of 
Commerce that imports of disposable pocket lighters from Thailand were 
being sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 
U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the institution of the Commission's 
investigation and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of November 9, 1994 
(59 F.R. 55853). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on March 21, 
1995, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on April 21, 1995. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 2876 (April 1995), 
entitled ``Disposable Lighters from Thailand: Investigation No. 731-TA-
701 (Final).''

    Issued: April 24, 1995.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10444 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the Annual Report of Scandium
International Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









Dated: February
20, 2015	                    /s/ George Putnam

George Putnam

Principal Executive
Officer
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO 

HAC VICE APPLICATION

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Robert Ellis (Dkt. No. 615) is DENIED for

failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that “he or

she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest

court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). 

Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it identifies only the

state of bar membership — e.g., “the bar of Illinois” — is inadequate under the rule because it

fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the

application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 619 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit32.1**

 

Certification ofChief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Arbor EnTech Corporation (the “Company”) forthe fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”),Harvey Houtkin, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2005, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation in the Quarterly Report, and the information in the Report, fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|                        | /s/ Harvey Houtkin      |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                        | Harvey Houtkin          |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated:  March 16, 2005 |                    |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of


Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Christopher L. Nines, Chief Financial Officer of Forestar Group Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Forestar Group Inc.


/s/ Christopher L. Nines


Christopher L. Nines


August 16, 2013
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

t0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142130 & (17) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142130 

 COA: 297927 

Wayne CC: 93-010422-FC 

KUSHAWN S. MILES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to expand record is DENIED.
Theodore MANOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9242.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FINALIZE 

SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00865 RS 

36281224v1 0996478 

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 

633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043 

213-680-2800 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION 

LILIANA MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., 

Defendant.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00865 RS

(Honorable Richard Seeborg) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FINALIZE 

SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS 

CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

(Filed concurrently with Stipulation] 

Complaint Filed: February 22, 2017 

Discovery Cut-off: Not Set 

Motion Cut-off: Not Set 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FINALIZE 

SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00865 RS 

36281224v1 0996478 

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 

633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043 

213-680-2800 

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time to Finalize 

Settlement and Dismiss Case with Prejudice, and for good cause shown, it is hereby 

ordered: 

1. That the parties shall file a stipulation for dismissal on or before May 

25, 2017. 

2. If the stipulation for dismissal is not filed by that date, the parties are 

ordered to appear on ____________, in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor of the 

San Fransisco Courthouse and show cause for why the case should not be dismissed. 

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: , 2017 

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

June 1, 2017

5/8/17
Делайте это правильно

«Я не вымыл, не прополоскал и не продезинфицировал раковину».

«Я вымыл, прополоскал и 

продезинфицировал раковину».

Защищайте людей повсюду. Всегда мойте, ополаскивайте и дезинфицируйте оборудованиепосле каждого применения.
REPORT ON
ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE


First
American Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (an indirect subsidiary of The
First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January 1,
2007 through December 31, 2007 ("the Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(l)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party ("the Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for
commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party
served as the commercial tax service provider (the
"Platform").


The
Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole.


PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as
of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this
assertion.





FIRST
AMERICAN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.


/s/
Scott R.
Friberg
 Scott R.
Friberg
 Chief
Operations Officer
 February
22, 2008
Exhibit 23.2 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3, as amended, of Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust (Registration Numbers 333-141703, 333-141703-01, and 333-141703-02) of ourattestation report dated January 28, 2008, with respect to U.S. Bank National Association’s compliance with specified servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for itsCorporate Trust Asset Backed Securities Platform as of November 30, 2007, and for the period from December 1, 2006 through November 30, 2007, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover CardExecution Note Trust for the year ended November 30, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

February 21, 2008
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXCESS International Inc.(the “***Company***”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, AllanGriebenow, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

 

 
| /S/ ALLAN GRIEBENOW                                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Allan Griebenow                                                    |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer |
|                                                               |
| Dated:  August 12, 2004                                  |

 

----
Exhibit 15.1  Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-188410 on Form F-3 of our reports dated March 28, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P., and the effectiveness of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2013.   /s/   Deloitte LLPChartered   Professional Accountants, Chartered AccountantsLicensed   Public AccountantsToronto,   CanadaMarch 28,   2014
Robert LUJAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10002.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Delinda LASATER, petitioner, v. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCE, et al.

No. 12-1308.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jomal Deshawn ADAMS, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-8428.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exclusivity and Generic Drugs: 

What Does It Mean?

Initial Exclusivities for New Drugs 

Exclusivity is a period of time when a brand-name drug is protected from generic drug 

competition. There are different exclusivities for different situations. Exclusivity is designed to 

promote a balance between new drug innovation and generic drug competition.

In most cases, a brand-name drug with a new active moiety has a 

five-year exclusivity.

A new brand-name drug for a disease or condition that affects fewer 

than 200,000 people in the United States (or that affects more people 

but for which the drug company still has no hope of covering the 

development costs) has a seven-year exclusivity.

A brand-name drug with an active ingredient that has been 

approved before may be awarded a three-year exclusivity in certain 

circumstances, such as if a new way of delivering the active ingredient 

is proposed (for example, a tablet rather than a liquid) or a different 

disease or condition the drug can treat is identified. To get this approval, 

the drug company must conduct new clinical studies in humans.

Additional Exclusivities May Be Eligible

Pediatric: A brand-name drug for which the sponsor has done pediatric studies (in 

response to a written request from FDA) may be eligible for a six-month exclusivity, 

which is added on to any other exclusivities or patents for that drug. 

Antibiotic: Certain new antibiotic drugs for specific infectious diseases may be 

eligible for a five-year exclusivity, which is added on to any other exclusivities for 

that drug.

After exclusivities no longer block generic 

approval, generics can join the market if:

The generic drug applicant has 

shown that the product has met 

all FDA standards for approval.

Patent protection no longer 

blocks generic approval.

The first generic can also get an exclusivity.

The first generic drug applicant to 

submit a substantially complete 

generic application that includes a 

challenge to the brand-name drug’s 

patents and that meets certain 

regulatory and legal requirements may 

be eligible for a 180-day exclusivity.

Visit www.FDA.gov/GenericDrugs to learn more 

about marketing exclusivities.
Starsha Monet SEWELL, petitioner, v. VATTEROTT EDUCATIONAL CENTERS, INC.

No. 12-8744.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24618-24619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11290]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Meeting of the Commission on Roles and Missions of the Armed 
Forces

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Commission on Roles and Missions of the 
Armed Forces.

ACTION: Notice.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 24619]] 


SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the 
Commission on Roles and Missions of the Armed Forces.
    The Commission is charged with providing an independent review of 
the roles and missions of the armed services to Congress, the Secretary 
of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The year-long 
review will identify changes that can be made to improve military 
effectiveness and eliminate unnecessary duplication among the services. 
The purpose of this meeting is to discuss some of the specific roles 
and missions issues that are being developed for consideration by the 
Commission. Material to be discussed will consist of both classified 
and unclassified information in a format that makes it impractical to 
separate the two.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-453, as amended (5 U.S.C. App II), it has been 
determined that this Commission on Roles and Missions meeting concerns 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that, accordingly, this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: May 10, 1995.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Extraordinary circumstances compel notice of 
this meeting to be posted in less than the 15-day requirement.

    Dated: May 3, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-11290 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M