alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018167EN.01000201.xml

| 15.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 May 2018

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2018

(2018/C 167/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2018 was definitively adopted on 30 November 2017 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2018 was definitively adopted on 30 November 2017 (2),

2

| — | on 22 February 2018, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2018, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 22 February 2018, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2018,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2018 was adopted on 14 May 2018.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 14 May 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. ZAHARIEVA

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 57, 28.2.2018, p. 1.

2

---
Case 4:17-cr-00089-PJH Document 8 Filed 02/28/17 Page 1 of 1
exh102q209.htm


     

    EXHIBIT
10.2


    


    


    


    [Name]

    [Title]

    MIPS
Technologies, Inc.

    1225
Charleston Road

    Mountain
View, CA  94043-1353

    


    Dear
[First Name]:

    


    This
letter (the “Agreement”) amends the agreement between MIPS Technologies, Inc.
and you dated [Date] (the “Change in Control Agreement”), in light of the
requirements of the final regulations promulgated under Section 409A (“Section
409A”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. MIPS Technologies, Inc.
must receive a copy of this Agreement, executed by you, not later than December
31, 2008. A copy of your Change in Control Agreement is attached for your
reference.

     

    Section
3(c) of your Change in Control Agreement is amended to add the following
sentence at the end:

     

    With
regard to cash payable to you, such payments shall each be classified as
separate payments under Treas. Reg. 1.409A-2(b)(2) and each separate payment
shall be assessed for qualification as a short-term deferral under Treas. Reg.
1.409A-1(a)(4), with the result that only the amount not classifiable as exempt
from Section 409A of the Code shall be regarded as subject to the distribution
requirements of Section 409A.

     

    Section
6(ii) of your Change in Control Agreement is amended to add the following
parenthetical clause after “Excise Tax”:

     

    (with
reduction to occur in the following order: (i) reduction of payments of cash;
and (ii) reduction in equity awards; and with reduction in each category to be
pro rata between those payments subject to Section 409A and payments not subject
to Section 409A)

     

    Except in
respect of the above amendments, we agree no other changes are made to your
Change in Control Agreement.

     

    Please
acknowledge your agreement with the above by signing below and returning the
original to me for filing with our records.  Should you have any
questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

     

    Thank you
for your assistance and cooperation with this matter.

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.

    


    


    


    Executive:                                                                       MIPS
Technologies, Inc.:

    


    


    _________________________________            By:
____________________________________
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 17-cv-00723NC

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

HARJEET SINGH GILL, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00723 NC

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. 33

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

no issue remains for the Court’s determination,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are

DISMISSED with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not reached, any party may

move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within sixty days. All 

scheduled dates are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 13, 2017, _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10675]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-185-000]


Northern Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Technical Conference

April 26, 1995.
    In the Commission's order issued March 30, 1995, the Commission 
held that the filing in the above captioned proceeding raises isues 
that should be addressed in a technical conference.
    Take notice that the technical conference will be held on 
Wednesday, May 10, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., in a room to be designated at 
the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 810 First 
Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426. All interested parties and Staff 
are permitted to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10675 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                         573,268
<SECURITIES>                                   329,476
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,652,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    459,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,595,641
<PP&E>                                       1,933,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                 862,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,936,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,771,614
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,027,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,936,604
<SALES>                                      4,548,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,548,847
<CGS>                                        2,199,064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,155,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                414,478
<INCOME-TAX>                                   156,613
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            257,865
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   257,865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Edward M. Jamison and Patrick Hartman each hereby certify as follows:



| | 1. | They are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Community Bancorp, a Nevada Corporation (the Company).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on their knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
this 8 day of August, 2007.



/s/ EDWARD M. JAMISONEdward M. JamisonPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ PATRICK HARTMANPatrick HartmanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W. Mobley, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Paul W. Mobley
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                                     Date: August 10, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10688]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[T.D. 7636]


Contributions to Pension, Profit-Sharing, etc., Plans on Behalf 
of Self-Employed Individuals and Shareholders-Employees; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final regulations 
(T.D. 7636), which were published in the Federal Register Friday, 
August 10, 1979 (44 FR 47046), relating to contributions to pension, 
profit-sharing, etc., plans on behalf of self-employed individuals and 
shareholder-employees.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brant Goldwyn (202) 622-6090, (not a 
toll-free call).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this correction 
clarify the applicability of the $100,000 limitation of section 
401(a)(17) to certain plans maintained by an aggregated employer group.

Need for Correction

    As published, T.D. 7636 contains an error which may prove to be 
misleading and is in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 1--INCOME TAX; TAXABLE YEARS BEGINNING AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1953

    Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


Sec. 1.401(e)-5  [Corrected]

    Par. 2. The first sentence of Sec. 1.401(e)-5 (a)(1) is amended by 
removing the ``(1)'' following the paragraph heading ``(a) General 
rules--(1) General rule.''.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 95-10688 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-60766 Summary Calendar
MARY C. FORD, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Samuel Ford, a Minor; SAMUEL F. FORD, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS GUARANTY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants, GUARANTY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

(1:93-CV-213-S-D)

July 7, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
We have carefully considered the briefs, the reply brief, the record excerpts, an d relevant portions of the summary judgment record itself. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Guaranty National Insurance Company and the plaintiffs appeal. For the reasons stated by the district court in its sixteen-page opinion filed under date of November 26, 1997, we2

AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment in favor of Guaranty National
I nsurance Company and the district court’s order of even date therewith.
AFFIRMED
.
11/27/2018

11/27/2018

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

/s/ Tanya E. Moore

Case 3:17-cv-00634-CRB Document 91 Filed 11/27/18 Page 1 of 1
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00344

- CR

Antonio Leonard Brown

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 89th District Court

o f Wichita County (53,525

- C )

June 18, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

( p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 761 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 761

  Designating the week of September 18 through September 24, 2022, as 
                ``Gold Star Families Remembrance Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2022

 Mrs. Hyde-Smith (for herself, Mr. Warnock, and Mr. Scott of Florida) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of September 18 through September 24, 2022, as 
                ``Gold Star Families Remembrance Week''.

Whereas the last Sunday in September--

    (1) is designated as ``Gold Star Mother's Day'' under section 111 of 
title 36, United States Code; and

    (2) was first designated as ``Gold Star Mother's Day'' under the Joint 
Resolution entitled ``Joint Resolution designating the last Sunday in 
September as `Gold Star Mother's Day', and for other purposes'', approved 
June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895);

Whereas there is no date dedicated to families affected by the loss of a loved 
        one who died in service to the United States;
Whereas a gold star symbolizes a family member who died in the line of duty 
        while serving in the Armed Forces;
Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces, through their service, 
        bear the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United 
        States;
Whereas the selfless example of the service of the members and veterans of the 
        Armed Forces, as well as the sacrifices made by the families of those 
        individuals, inspires all individuals in the United States to sacrifice 
        and work diligently for the good of the United States; and
Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members of the Armed Forces 
        and the families of veterans of the Armed Forces should never be 
        forgotten: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of September 18 through September 
        24, 2022, as ``Gold Star Families Remembrance Week'';
            (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made by--
                    (A) the families of members of the Armed Forces who 
                made the ultimate sacrifice in order to defend freedom 
                and protect the United States; and
                    (B) the families of veterans of the Armed Forces; 
                and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        Gold Star Families Remembrance Week by--
                    (A) performing acts of service and good will in 
                their communities; and
                    (B) celebrating families in which loved ones made 
                the ultimate sacrifice so that others could continue to 
                enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Titanium Asset Management Corp. (the
Registrant);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the Registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Dated:  March 31, 2009
    /s/ Nigel WightmanNigel WightmanChairman and Chief Executive Officer 70
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

t0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148403

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148403

COA: 312556

Livingston CC: 12

- 020392

- FH

ROBERT CLINTON GIAMPORCARO,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 3, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.