alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 400 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 400

  Designating September 2021 as ``National Childhood Cancer Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2021

 Mr. Manchin (for himself, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Reed, Mrs. 
Capito, Mr. Casey, Mr. Graham, and Mr. Hawley) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 7, 2021

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating September 2021 as ``National Childhood Cancer Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas each year more than 15,500 children under the age of 19 in the United 
        States are diagnosed with cancer;
Whereas every year more than 1,700 children in the United States lose their 
        lives to cancer;
Whereas childhood cancer is the leading cause of death from disease and the 
        second overall leading cause of death for children in the United States;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for children with cancer has increased from 58 
        percent in the mid-1970s to 84 percent in 2020, representing significant 
        improvement from previous decades;
Whereas more than \2/3\ of children who survive cancer will develop at least 1 
        chronic health condition, and many survivors will face a late-effect 
        from treatment that could be considered severe or life-threatening;
Whereas cancer patients face a higher risk of contracting the Coronavirus 
        Disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to weakened immune systems; and
Whereas cancer occurs regularly and randomly and spares no racial or ethnic 
        group, socioeconomic class, or geographic region: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 2021 as ``National Childhood 
        Cancer Awareness Month'';
            (2) requests that the Federal Government, States, 
        localities, and nonprofit organizations observe the month with 
        appropriate programs and activities, with the goal of 
        increasing public knowledge of the risks of cancer;
            (3) encourages survivors of childhood cancer to continue to 
        receive ongoing monitoring and physical and psychosocial care 
        throughout their adult lives;
            (4) recognizes the human toll of cancer and pledges to make 
        the prevention and cure of cancer a public health priority; and
            (5) reminds the people of the United States that these 
        children are the definition of bravery, and commends and honors 
        their courage.
                                 <all>
```
Dante O. TAYLOR v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-01596-SCT

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: April 15, 2019 Closed: July 18, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Certiorari - Granted.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2007-13

  I, Joshua Kelly, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Mortgage
    Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-13 Trust (the "Exchange Act
    Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Master
    Servicer and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Master Servicer has fulfilled
    its obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, dated August
    29, 2007, among Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, as depositor,
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as master servicer, and HSBC Bank USA, National
    Association, as trustee, in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
    report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
    instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
    disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

    Dated:   March 24, 2008


    /s/ Joshua Kelly
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10394]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Information Robotics and Intelligent 
Systems; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Information, Robotics and 
Intelligent Systems (1200).
    Date and Time: May 16-18, 1995, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: St. James Hotel, 950 24th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Howard Moraff, Acting Deputy Division 
Director, Robotics and Intelligence, Room 1115, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 
306-1028.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Database and Expert Systems 
Program proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-10394 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Derek V. Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/    DEREK V. SMITHDerek V. SmithChairman and Chief Executive Officer


February 28, 2008
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

OCTAVIO BERRERA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 685

[ August 8, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Glenn D. Kelley , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 2002CF000127AXXXMB

.

Glenn H. Mitchell , West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Subramanian Sundaresh, certify to the bestof my knowledge based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Adaptec, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the “*Form 10-Q*”), that the Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information containedin the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for theperiods covered by the Form 10-Q.

| Date: February 7, 2006 | By:    | /s/ SUBRAMANIAN  SUNDARESH |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                        |   | Subramanian Sundaresh      |
|                        |   | *Chief Executive Officer*  |

 

I,Marshall L. Mohr, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review ofthe Form 10-Q, that the Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.

| Date: February 7, 2006 | By:    | /s/ MARSHALL  L. MOHR     |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                        |   | Marshall L. Mohr          |
|                        |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10350]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1046-DR]


California; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of California (FEMA-1046-DR), dated March 12, 1995, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Pauline C. Campbell, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective April 19, 1995.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Richard W. Krimm,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 95-10350 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
Order filed September 26, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00543-CV

____________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF JEFF SEELY AND 

JACQUALIN SEELY

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-60928

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed July 11, 2016. To date, the filing 

fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellants are excused by statute 

or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $205.00 to the clerk 

of this court on or before October 11, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails 

to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Jose A. DIEPPA, Appellant, v. Maria J. DIEPPA, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1885

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### The HONORABLE SCOTT O. WRIGHT, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Western District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-1690

___________ Pete Wright, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Bill Armontrout; Loren Newby; * District Court for the James Eberle; Allen Nixon; * Western District of Missouri. Tim Branson; Dolores Phillips; * Selita White; Odell Henry; * Raby; Raymond New; Cecil * [UNPUBLISHED] Pettus, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 6, 1996 Filed: November 12, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Pete Wrig ht appeals from the district court's award 1 of costs to defendants after summary judgment was entered against Wright in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discret ion in assessing costs here, as Wright has failed to showthat either the costs were unnecessary or that he is incapable o f paying the costs. See Slagenweit v. Slagenweit , 63 F.3d 719, 720-21 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (standard of review; placing burden upon part y against whom costs we re taxed to show deposition was purely investigative and

### -2-

copies were obtained for use other than trial preparation); McGill v
. Faulkner , 18 F.3d 456 , 459 (7th Cir.) (burden is on prisoner-plaintiff to show he is incapable of paying costs due to his indigency), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 233 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Justin MUELLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3087

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE RAMOS,

Appellant,

v.

GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, as subrogee of Michael Illes,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2461

[August 22, 2019]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE16012441 .

Jose Ramos, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Sharon C. Degnan of Kubicki Draper, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order filed January 25, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00009

- CV

____________ DESIREE FELICIA SAPP , Appellant

V.
DR. ROBERT ANDING OF PREVIA MEDICAL GROUP; THE WOMAN'S HOSPITAL OF TEXAS, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIO N,

JOHN DOES 1

- 5 , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- 76497



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed January 10, 2022. Our review has determined
that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the Order Denying Application for Temporary Restraining Order signed December 2, 2021.The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s

record on or before F e bruary 8, 2 022 , containing the above listed document.
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Jus tices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
Rafael Antonio Melgar GUTIERREZ, aka Rafael Antunez Burges, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General.

No. 12-9537.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6321
LORENZO MAURICE JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. E. GUNJA, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-01-473-WMN) Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 29, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorenzo Maurice Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lorenzo Maurice Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Gunja , No. CA-01-473-WMN (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.3**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We have issued our report datedFebruary 21, 2012, with respect to Management’s Assertion on Compliance with specified servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation AB in the Annual Report of Discover CardExecution Note Trust on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2011. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Discover Bank, Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card ExecutionNote Trust on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-141703, File No. 333-141703-01, File No. 333-141703-02, File No. 333-167413, File No. 333-167413-01 and File No. 333-167413-02). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Dallas, Texas

February 21, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL BENCH TRIAL MINUTES

Date: January 19, 2018 Time: 5 hours 7 minutes Judge: VINCE CHHABRIA

Case No.: 16-cv-07014-VC Case Name: Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal, LLC v. 

City of Oakland

Attorney for Plaintiff: Robert Feldman, David Myre, Meredith Shaw, Eliyahu Ness, Stephen 

Swedlow, and Nathan Feldman

Attorney for Defendant: Kevin Siegel, Timothy Colvig, Gregory Aker, Christopher Long

Attorney for Defendant Intervenor: Colin O'Brien, Heather Lewis, Jessica Yarnall Loarie, 

Adrienne Bloch, Marie Logan, Joanne Spalding

Deputy Clerk: Kristen Melen Court Reporter: Debra Pas

Trial Began: January 16, 2018

PROCEEDINGS:

Bench Trial - Day 3.

RULINGS AND ORDERS:

Witness sworn and examined:

 Claudia Cappio

 Dr. Ranajit Sahu

 Dr. Hope "Nadia" Moore

 Dr. Zoe Chafe

 Dr. Carlos Fernandez Pello

 Stephen Sullivan

 James Wolff by video deposition

ADMITTED EXHIBITS: 4, 14, 19, 24, 25, 31, 32, 42 , 46, 47, 48, 53, 57, 58, 62, 65, 96, 98, 103, 128, 131, 133, 135, 136, 138, 

141, 145, 149, 166, 213, 214, 216, 217, 221, 281, 286, 371, 372, 388, 431-433, 435, 440, 448, 453, 454, 463, 466, 478, 515, 516, 

522, 584, 593, 594, 596, 608, 612, 630, 635, 736, 738, 814, 815, 842, 844, 845, 848, 900, 915, 930, 960, 961, 972, 976, 982, 

1069, 1083-1085, 1207, 1225, 1229, 1238-1261, 1267, 1272, 1273, 1278

*Parties will file a stipulation encompassing all exhibits they stipulate to admitting into evidence and provide the Clerk 

with a copy of the exhibits for admission and retention by the Court.

Case 3:16-cv-07014-VC Document 231 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6655

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN DEONTA STROM, a/k/a Jae Dee, a/k/a Jae, a/k/a J-Dirt,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 22-6850

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN DEONTA STROM, a/k/a Jae Dee, a/k/a Jae, a/k/a J-Dirt,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00159-LMB-1)

Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 20, 2022

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6655 Doc: 6 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin Deonta Strom, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6655 Doc: 6 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Justin Deonta Strom appeals the district court’s orders 

denying Strom’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motions to correct purported clerical errors in his 

presentence report and criminal judgment. Upon review of the record, we discern no error 

in the district court’s rulings on Strom’s motions. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s orders. United States v. Strom, No. 1:12-cr-00159-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. May 24, 2022;

July 14, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6655 Doc: 6 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 3 of 3