alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Private ADR.” 

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff(s) 

v.

Defendant(s) 

CASE No. 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following 

stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the 

following ADR process: 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

 Private ADR (specify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, 

unless otherwise ordered. )

 other requested deadline: 

 Date:

Date:

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: 

Date:

U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct 

mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an 

early settlement conference with a Magistrate 

Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this 

form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR 

L.R. 3-5.

Terra Nova Homeowners Assoc.

Travelers Property Casualty Company of 

America

17-CV-00817-JST

■

■

May 10, 2017 /s/ Tom Fier

May 10, 2017 /s/ Kathleen M. DeLaney

X

May 11, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 606 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 606

Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National High School Seniors Voter 
                          Registration Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2022

    Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Mr. King) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National High School Seniors Voter 
                          Registration Day''.

Whereas in order for the Federal Government to remain of the people, by the 
        people, and for the people, individuals must take advantage of their 
        right to vote;
Whereas the right to vote is one of the most important rights of a citizen, and 
        every effort should be made to promote voter registration at school so 
        that students may begin participating in the foundation of the 
        representative democracy of the United States;
Whereas the legislature of Louisiana voted in 2002 to annually recognize the 
        first Tuesday in May as Louisiana High School Seniors Voter Registration 
        Day; and
Whereas the purpose of National High School Seniors Voter Registration Day is to 
        allow students to register to vote at school to encourage their 
        participation in making democracy work: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the first Tuesday in May as ``National High 
        School Seniors Voter Registration Day''; and
            (2) encourages school districts to--
                    (A) register high school seniors of voting age on 
                the first Tuesday in May; and
                    (B) encourage students to make a lifelong 
                commitment to civic participation in all areas of 
                society by educating them on the importance of voting.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 67

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-68 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

CHARLOTTE DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-00770-MOC-DSC

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Application[s] for Admission to Practice Pro 

Hac Vice [for John Everett Tomlinson and Rhon Eugene Jones]” (documents ##3-4) filed 

November 16, 2016. For the reasons set forth therein, the Motion will be granted.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties, including but 

not limited to moving counsel; and to the Honorable Max O. Cogburn, Jr..

SO ORDERED.

RANDALL DEAN SEIDL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

MONSANTO COMPANY, )

)

Defendant. )

Signed: November 16, 2016

Case 3:17-cv-00519-VC Document 5 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 1
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1250

___________ Michele Cherie Chapman Moore, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Joyce Plock; State of Nebraska; * York Penitentary for Women; * [UNPUBLISHED] Dave Heineman, Governor of * Nebraska; Robert Houston, * Director of Dept. of Correctional * Services; Ryan Mahr, Warden of * Community Corrections Center of * Omaha; Jamey Odell, R.N. Acting * ADON of Attorney General’s Office * OCC, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 27, 2010 Filed: June 2, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chie f Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
-2- Former Nebraska inmate Michele M oore appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal without prejudice of her 42 U.S.C . § 1983 complaint. After careful de novo review, seeMoore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Moor e’s claims were barred by the Eleventh Amendment, seeWill v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police , 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989) (because Eleventh Amendment immunizes states from suit, neither st ate nor its officials acting in their official capacity are “persons” under § 1983); Monroe v. Ark. State Univ. , 495 F.3d 591, 594 (8th Cir. 2007) (E leventh Amendment bars suit against state agency for any kind of relief); Larson v. Kempker , 414 F.3d 936, 939 n.3 (8th Cir. 2005) (Eleventh Amendment bars § 1983 lawsuit ag ainst state agency even if entity is moving force behind deprivati on of federal right (citing Kentucky v. Graham , 473 U.S. 159, 169 (1985))); Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp. , 172 F.3d 531, 535 (8th Cir. 1999) (unless pleading expressly and unambiguously states public official is sued in individual capacity, it will be assumed th at defendant is su ed only in official capacity).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Brittany M. BOQUET v. Nicole L. BOQUET

NO. 2019-C-0673

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

*1262Denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIAN M. GERMANI, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAFEWAY GROCERY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-06238-MEJ 

REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF 

DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled case is hereby REFERRED to the 

Honorable James Donato for consideration of whether the case is related to Germani v. Safeway 

Grocery, 17-cv-00742-JD.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 30, 2017

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge
Howell M. RAMSEY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2288

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
MIRACLE CHIROPRATIC & REHAB CENTER, LLC, a/a/o Dieuvela Louis Thomas, Petitioner, v. SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-4179

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

I, Alfred S. Whittet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form  10-Q of The Wilber
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made,  in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
      including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others
      within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
      quarterly report is being prepared;

      b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based
      on such evaluation ( the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)   Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
      registrant's first fiscal quarter that has materially affected,   or is
      reasonably likely to affect the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting.

Date:  August 5, 2004
       --------------

By:
    ---------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
La Oficina de Salud de la Mujer de la FDA

www.fda.gov/womensdiabetes

Su medidor 

de glucosa

Los medidores de glucosa analizan y registran la 

cantidad de azúcar (llamada glucosa) que tiene 

en la sangre. Le ayudan a hacer un seguimiento 

de su nivel de azúcar en la sangre a diferentes 

horas durante el día y la noche.

Los medidores pueden ayudarle a saber cómo 

están funcionando sus medicamentos para la 

diabetes. 

También pueden ayudarle a saber de qué modo 

los alimentos que come y su actividad física 

pueden cambiar su nivel de azúcar en la sangre.

Hay medidores disponibles en 

diferentes tamaños. También 

poseen distintas características. 

Algunos medidores le permiten 

hacer un seguimiento e imprimir 

los resultados. Otros tienen audio 

y pantallas más grandes para 

ayudar a las personas que tienen 

problemas de visión. El medidor 

que elige debe adaptarse a su 

estilo de vida y a sus necesidades.

Tres cosas que necesitará 

con su medidor:

• Lanceta: aguja que se utiliza para obtener 

una gota de sangre del dedo o de otra 

parte del cuerpo.

• Tira de prueba: la tira de prueba va en el 

medidor. Usted pone una gota de sangre 

en la tira de prueba.

• Soluciones de control: líquido que se 

utiliza para asegurar que su medidor esté 

funcionando correctamente.
1. Lea las instrucciones del 

medidor y las tiras de 

prueba antes de comenzar 

a usarlos.

2. Lávese las manos antes de 

controlar su nivel de azúcar 

en la sangre.

Los alimentos o el jugo en 

los dedos pueden afectar 

el resultado de su nivel de 

azúcar en la sangre.

3. Use la tira de prueba adecuada para su medidor.

El medidor puede no 

trabajar bien o revelar 

resultados incorrectos si 

utiliza la tira de prueba 

equivocada.

4. Escriba sus resultados y la fecha y hora de la prueba.

Hágalo incluso si su 

medidor registra sus 

valores. Lleve consigo los 

resultados cuando acuda a 

su visita médica.

5. Limpie su medidor según las instrucciones. 

Algunos productos de 

limpieza pueden dañar su 

medidor.

6. Hable con su proveedor de 

atención médica sobre si sus 

medicamentos afectarán su 

nivel de azúcar en la sangre.

Si usted es un paciente renal 

en diálisis, la solución de 

diálisis puede cambiar su 

nivel de azúcar en la sangre.

7. Lleve consigo su medidor 

cuando visite al médico. 

De esta forma, puede 

analizar su nivel de azúcar 

en la sangre frente al 

médico o la enfermera para 

asegurarse de que lo está 

haciendo correctamente. 

Su proveedor de atención 

médica podría imprimir 

los resultados de su nivel 

de azúcar en la sangre del 

medidor.

La Oficina de Salud de la Mujer de la FDA desarrolló esta hoja informativa.

Para obtener otros recursos para la diabetes de la FDA, vaya a

www.fda.gov/womensdiabetes

2018

7 consejos útiles para analizar su nivel de azúcar en la sangre
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21210-21211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10625]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5200-2]


Tennessee Gas and Pipeline; Notice of Proposed Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Protection Agency (EPA) has offered to potentially responsible parties 
an Administrative Order on Consent to settle claims for past and future 
removal actions at the Tennessee Gas and Pipeline Site along the Gulf 
Coast of Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi and extending along three 
routes to markets in the midwestern and northeastern United States. EPA 
will consider public comments on the proposed settlement for thirty 
(30) days. EPA may withdraw from or modify the Agreement should such 
comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed 
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Copies of the 
proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, Waste 
[[Page 21211]] Management Division, U.S. EPA, Region IV, 345 Courtland 
Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30365, 404/347-5059 X6169.
    Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor within 30 days 
of the date of publication.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
H. Kirk Lucius,
Chief, Waste Programs Branch, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 95-10625 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of GTA-IB, LLC.

 
| Date: May 15, 2006 | /s/ W. Bradley Blair, II           |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | W. Bradley Blair, II               |
|                    | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                    |                                    |
| Date: May 15, 2006 | /s/ Scott D. Peters                     |   |
|                    | Scott D. Peters                         |
|                    | *Secretary and Chief Financial Officer* |
|                         |                                         |        |  |

 

----
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Texas State Board 

Austin 22, Texas 

InexIt’ opinion on t 

II 1, Vamon’r ht80tfma R~vlred 

morlbe end amldaln a o&am3 OF 

to the pualifioatlona~~oi thoao angaged, and who 168~ ewa 

balm- In commotion w! 

6 in tha waatiorioi aath the aura and disposition 

of dead huavm bodies in this State and shall have 

t&a d&t, to be exaroissd at ita &oration, to 

aaploy oapable sad dtlofent lecturer8 an& damnstrators in the soianoe or ambalmlng ror tha bensiit of all lloanse~ embalmarre in this Stats. Tfie 

said leotunrs anddamonstratore shell meet not 

aore than onoa in sauh pear 81th annual aeealo~ 
Texas State Board of Embalmfnf3. page 

of tha Texas ?u~ral 3ireotora' 

Aaeooiation." 

2 

and Embeimare* 

wNo oK~osr -a tb porter tc very or waive any d-it- 

(2#07~,la?3# ~~~(l~~~u;~~o~;~:~:; :?,:; "' 

permitted to euistituir hls'o& $&ant as to the best lil(~ans 

of perrormiag hie ofrioial duties, ii suoh is oontrary to the 

plain prwisicne of ths statute; although in hia doing 80 he 

doea not have an evil or corrupt motive, and no loea results 

to tIm publlo. Sharp Y. Brown, 38 Ida. 136, 221 P. 139. 

WDieoretlon in the mannsr of the performsnoe OS an aot ari8ea whan tha act map be psrr0n44a In on6 or two or mor4 rape, either or which 

muld ba lawful, and whsrs it ie laft to the will 

or Judgarnt or the prrr0rrarrO to determine in whioh 

WSY it S&S11 br p4rfOXQ4d. Buti Whhm 6 pO8itite 

auty l8 anjoined, aP;I there is but one way in 

It 18 ths Board.8 duty "to pr4aoribe and mlnt8in a 

d&lard of proficianoy as to the qualifications Of” smbalmppere. 

TO 60,thiil. it i8 aut~,oriesd 'Clt it8 &i8Or4tiOn, to employ 

oapab14 and 8fSioient lsoturrrs 8nd demon8tretOrs.* Tha right 

0r a414otion -- es to whom to employ -- .le also to be exeroiead et Its (th4 Bcmrd*a) dlaor4tlon.W 

Now, the r&l4 la, when tha etatute pr4aorib48 the 

time within whhioh pub110 orflorrs ar4 nq;lrrd to parrorm an 

OmO%?il not it i.S IIWely dir4OtOrp; UIL~OBB~ the 8t4tUt4 d4dSS 

th4 4xeroiar 0r th4 powrr 4ft4r oucrh tha or the natur4 or th4 

aot or tha statutory r454Uy 8hOW6 that the time was intended 

_ a8 a 1iQl1tat10n. Stetr v. Fox, (1939 Austin C. A.) 133 s. w. 

(26) 987. 
‘ibras 3tate Board OS &~balming, pgo 3 

It ia the v3aw of this dapartmant th8t thrr Board 

ix authorized to paea the resolution lnquirrd abbut. 

Yours very truly 

ATFORNEY CZNERAL OF TSAS 

By (0) Devid Wuntoh 

Aseistant 

DW:db 

Dk':io 

AFPROPSD YBR. 21, 19i.C 

(8) fb’OV4r tt813Or8 

ATTOREOSY GBNXRAL OF TJiXAS 

APPRGVlGD OFIRION CCMMI!J!TEE 

BY (8) am, CIiAIRwa
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ASPIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ECC CENTCOM CONSTRUCTORS LLC, ET 

AL., 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 17-cv-00224-YGR 

ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING

On January 28, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an 

opinion affirming the Court’s July 18, 2017 order granting defendants’ motion to vacate the final 

arbitration award and July 25, 2017 order denying plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of that 

order. (Dkt. No. 58.) The Court of Appeals subsequently issued a mandate regarding that opinion 

on March 14, 2019. (Dkt. No. 59.) 

Accordingly, the Court SETS a compliance hearing for Friday, August 30, 2019. By no 

later than Friday, August 23, 2019, parties shall file either (a) a joint statement regarding the 

status of the above-captioned action; or (b) a one-page joint statement setting forth an explanation 

regarding the failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the 

compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the 

parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 13, 2019 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Krupp
Realty Fund 4 Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         662,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,530<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               399,675
<PP&E>                                      35,393,027<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                            (23,868,764)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,593,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          625,708
<BONDS>                                     16,782,705<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   (4,814,893)<F5>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,593,520
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,730,872<F6>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,211,638<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             306,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,651<F8>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   211,290<F9>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F9>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F9>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables grouped in"prepaid expenses and other assets" on the
Balance Sheet.
<F2>Multi-family complexes of $35,045,428 and deferred expenses of $347,599.
<F3>Accumulated depreciation of $23,627,670 and accumulated amortization of
deferred expenses of $241,094.
<F4>Represents mortgage notes payable.
<F5>Represents total defecit of the General Partners and Limited Partners of
($306,701)and ($4,508,192), respectively.
<F6>Includes all revenue of the Partnership.
<F7>Includes operating expenses of $644,473, real estate taxes of $188,983 and
depreciation and amortization of $378,182.
<F8>Includes minority interest of ($1,651).
<F9>Net income allocated $2,113 to the General Partners and $209,177 to the
Limited Partners.  Average net income per Unit of Limited Partners interest
is $6.69 on 30,000 Units outstanding.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>