alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 106-107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32317]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. FE C&E 94-15--Certification Notice--143]


Tenaska IV Texas Partners, Ltd. Notice of Filing of Coal 
Capability Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 12, 1994, Tenaska IV Texas Partners, Ltd. 
submitted a coal capability self-certification pursuant to section 201 
of the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, as amended.

ADDRESSES: Copies of self-certification filings are available for 
public inspection, upon request, in the Office of Fuels Programs, 
Fossil Energy, Room 3F-056, FE-52, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Russell at (202) 586-9624.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of the Powerplant and Industrial 
Fuel Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 et seq.), 
provides that no new baseload electric powerplant may be constructed or 
operated without the capability to use coal or another alternate fuel 
as a primary energy source. In order to meet the requirement of coal 
capability, the owner or operator of such facilities proposing to use 
natural gas or petroleum as its primary energy source shall certify, 
pursuant to FUA section 201(d), to the Secretary of Energy prior to 
construction, or prior to operation as a base load powerplant, that 
such powerplant has the capability to use coal or another alternate 
fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with section 201(a) as 
of the date filed with the Department Of Energy. The Secretary is 
required to publish a notice in the Federal Register that a 
certification has been filed. The following owner/operator of a 
proposed new baseload powerplant has filed a self-certification in 
acccordance with section 201(d). [[Page 107]] 
    Owner: Tenaska IV Texas Partners, Inc. Omaha, Nebraska.
    Operator: Tenaska IV Texas Partners, Inc. Omaha, Nebraska.
    Location: west of Johnson County Road No. 1022 Cleburne, Texas.
    Plant Configuration: Combined cycle Cogeneration.
    Capacity: 258 megawatts.
    Fuel: Natural gas.
    Purchasing Entities: Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
    In-Service Date: January, 1997.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., December 21, 1994.
Anthony J. Como,
Director, Office of Coal & Electricity, Office of Fuels Programs, 
Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 94-32317 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID BERLANGA, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00282-MMC 

ORDER AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS 

LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY; 

CONTINUING HEARING ON 

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; 

CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Before the Court is defendants Equilon Enterprises LLC, CRI U.S. LP, CRI 

Catalyst Company LP and Shell Pipeline Company LP's (collectively, "Shell Defendants") 

"Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint," filed June 26, 2017. Plaintiffs David 

Berlanga, Brandon Ehresman, Charles Gaeth, Michael Gonzalez, John Langlitz and 

Christopher Palacio have filed opposition, to which Shell Defendants have replied. 

Having read and considered the parties' respective written submissions, the Court, for the 

reasons stated below, finds it appropriate to afford plaintiffs the opportunity to file a 

surreply.

In their First Amended Class Action Complaint, plaintiffs allege they have not been 

provided with rest breaks in accordance with California law. In their motion, Shell 

Defendants argue, inter alia, that plaintiffs' claims are completely preempted by the Labor 

Management Relations Act because, according to Shell Defendants, resolution of those 

claims will require interpretation of terms in collective bargaining agreements ("CBAs") 

governing plaintiffs' employment. Although the motion identifies certain terms in the 

CBAs that pertain to rest breaks, Shell Defendants do not identify any dispute as to the

interpretation of those terms nor do they explain how plaintiffs' claims are dependent on 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

the resolution of any such dispute. In their reply, however, Shell Defendants identify a 

dispute as to the meaning of the contractual term "uninterrupted" and argue the dispute 

as to interpretation of that term must be resolved in order to determine plaintiffs' claims. 

(See Defs.' Reply at 5:17 - 6:11.) 

In order to afford plaintiffs an opportunity to respond to the above-referenced new 

argument, the Court hereby sets the following supplemental briefing schedule and 

continues the hearing on Shell Defendants' motion, as follows:

1. No later than August 11, 2017, plaintiffs shall file a surreply, not to exceed five 

pages in length.

2. The hearing on Shell Defendants' motion to dismiss is hereby CONTINUED 

from August 4, 2017, to August 25, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.

Lastly, in light of the above, the Case Management Conference is hereby 

CONTINUED from September 15, 2017, to September 29, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint 

Case Management Conference shall be filed no later than September 22, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 31, 2017

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge
STATE of Louisiana v. Kevin BESSE

NO. 2018-KH-1559

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Denied. Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Besse v. State, 14-2636 (La. 2/26/16), 184 So.3d 1272.
Celia LOCKWOOD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. HMC ASSETS, LLC, Solely in its Capacity AS Separate TRUSTEE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND II TRUST et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1564

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.

Dismissed. Denied.
EXHIBIT 3 

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 20-4 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 2
1

From: Sonal Mehta

Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 5:15 PM

To: David Godkin; James Kruzer; bpf@criterionlaw.com

Cc: SERVICE-SIX4THREE

Subject: Six4Three, LLC v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. CIV533328

Counsel,

We have reviewed Plaintiff Six4Three LLC’s January 12, 2017 Response To Defendant Facebook Inc.'s Specially Prepared 

Interrogatories (Set Two) seeking the basis for Six4Three’s contentions with respect to the predicates for Section 

17200.  In its responses, Six4Three identifies a variety of state and federal laws that it contends that Facebook has 

violated, a number of which are facially inapplicable and for which we do not believe Six4Three could even assert a claim 

in good faith.  Before we take action with the court, we ask that Six4Three review its contentions with respect to the 

underlying state and federal laws referenced in these interrogatory responses and let us know by 5 pm ET on Monday 

which of the predicate laws listed in the interrogatory responses Six4Three intends to pursue as a basis for its 

unlawfulness claim. If we do not hear from you by then, we will understand that Six4Three maintains its contentions 

that Facebook has violated the all of the laws identified therein and plans to assert those laws as a basis for its 

unlawfulness claim in the case going forward, including to oppose summary judgment and thereafter, and we will 

proceed accordingly. 

Best,

Sonal N. Mehta | Durie Tangri LLP | smehta@durietangri.com | (415) 376-6427

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 20-4 Filed 02/06/17 Page 2 of 2
Scott Edward STUART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2540

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |                         |                       |
|---------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Date:      March 31, 2008 | By:                          | /s/ Ross    Bernstein |
|                      | Ross      Bernstein          |
|                      | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                      |                         |

----

----
Juan FULANOS NOS. 1-40 and Juana Fulano, Appellants, v. FANJUL CORPORATION, Biesterfeld International GmbH, and Biesterfeld U.S., Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-2913

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 27, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000462 23-FEB-2016 09:21 AM
**Exhibit 15.1**

May 7, 2008 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc. 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-33344, 333-38163, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-35796,333-45540, 333-52314, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-98097, 333-101332, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586, 333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507, 333-138593, and 333-147268; and Form S-3 Nos.333-81101 and 333-142795) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our reports dated November 5, 2007, February 4, 2008 and May 7, 2008, relating to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. thatare included in its Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2007, December 30, 2007 and March 30, 2008.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant

No. 06-15-00042-CV v.

Margaret Jordan, Appellee

Appeal from the 170th District Court of 

McLennan County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2014-

243-4). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the award of 

attorney fees. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We further order that the appellee, Margaret Jordan, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 29, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Javoney D. ROBERTS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of California

AUBURN CARPENTER, et al.

5:17-cv-00288

FCA US LLC, et al.

See Attachment A

Shana E. Scarlett

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202

Berkeley, CA 94710

NC

1/20/2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan Y. Soong

Signatu

Case 5:17-cv-00288-NC Document 5 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 3
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

5:17-cv-00288

0.00

Case 5:17-cv-00288-NC Document 5 Filed 01/20/17 Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENT A

Defendants:

FCA US LLC

c/o The Corporation Trust Company

Corporation Trust Center

1209 Orange Street

Wilmington, DE 19801

Robert Bosch GmbH

Robert-Bosch-Platz 1

70839 Gerlingen-Schillerhohe

Baden-Wuerttemberg

Germany

Robert Bosch LLC

c/o Illinois Corporation Service

801 Adlai Stevenson Drive

Springfield, IL 62703

Case 5:17-cv-00288-NC Document 5 Filed 01/20/17 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTIONCASE NO. 5:16-CV-02063 

TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT DOTY, individually, and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HP, INC. and DOES 1-10, 

Defendant(s). 

Case No. 5:16-cv-02063 

ORDER TRANSFERRING 

ACTION TO THE NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

[28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)] 

Honorable Cormac J. Carney 

JS-6

Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 22 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION CASE NO. 5:16-CV-02063 

TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

For the reasons set forth in the Parties’ Stipulation to Transfer Action to the 

Northern District of California, the Court hereby ORDERS that: 

(1) all operative deadlines in this Doty action are VACATED; 

(2) this Doty action is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California, 

where three related cases are already pending. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 26, 2017 United States District Court Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 22 Filed 01/26/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTIONCASE NO. 5:16-CV-02063 

TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 22 Filed 01/26/17 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT A

-FILED UNDER SEALCase 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 75-1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Michael E. Lehman,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SunMicrosystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
| Date: November 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL E. LEHMAN   |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                   | Name:  | Michael E. Lehman       |
|                   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1




                   CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tarpon  Industries,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic  Report"),
we,  James W.  Bradshaw,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Active  Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  and Matthew Soderman,  Chief Accounting  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Periodic  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 15, 2006
                                     /s/ James W. Bradshaw
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    James W. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Acting Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  May 15, 2006
                                     /s/ Matthew Soderman
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Matthew Soderman
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

t0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148870

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148870

COA: 317329 

Wayne CC: 12-008413-FJ

EMMANUEL JALEN BRIGGS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-150627) pertaining to the Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 5, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. and the consolidated balance sheet of Pioneer Natural Resources GP LLC included            in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

Ernst & Young LLP

 

Dallas, Texas

March 5, 2009
EX-10.35






EXHIBIT 10.35




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE JOHN B. SANFILIPPO & SON, INC. 2008 EQUITY

INCENTIVE PLAN




     Section 1.43(b), “Termination of Service”, of the John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan is hereby amended by deleting the word “Committee” and inserting in its place the
word “Board”.
Introducing FaceTime video calling. Smile.

© 2010 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. 1-800-MY-APPLE or www.apple.com. Wireless service plan required. FaceTime requires iPhone 4 and Wi-Fi.

CONFIDENTIAL APL-GRACE_00000941

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-4 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Valley High Mining Company (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, John Michael Coombs, CEO, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Chairman of the Board of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: May 7, 2007                                  /s/ John Michael Coombs
                                                                  -------------------------------
                                                                  John Michael Coombs,
                                                                 CEO, President, CFO, and Chairman of
                                                                 the Board
Exhibit 4.121




Exhibit 4.121





		
	
	TSX V: NGP

	OTCBB: NGLPF











November 13, 2008













Ms. Mel Meier

Bureau of Land Management 

  1340 Financial Boulevard 

  Reno, Nevada 89510

Re:Royalty Conversion 

Dear Ms. Meier.





In accordance with regulations contained in 43 CFR 3211 and 3212, regarding the Energy Policy Act Royalty Conversions, Nevada Geothermal Power Company here by requests that the leases listed below have their royalty converted to the royalty rate as described in 43 CFR 3211.17 (a)(1) since there has never been any production from the leases.





				
	 	•
	N-80070 (08/06)
	Pending prior to EPA of 2005

	 	•
	N-78777 (03/06)
	Pending prior to EPA of 2005

	 	•
	N-78124 (06/06)
	Pending prior to EPA of 2005

	 	•
	N-79745 (03/06)
	Pending prior to EPA of 2005

	 	•
	N-74855 (10/02)
	 







Should any additional information he needed or required, please contact Sharon DeSimoni at 775-786­3399 x 12 or by email at sdesimoni@nevadageothermal.com.





Yours truly,





NEVADA GEOTHERMAL POWER INC.

Brian Fairbank, President and CEO

BF:SD









			
	tel    604.688.1553
	Suite 900 – 409 Granville Street
	info@nevadageothermal.com

	fax  604.688.5926
	Vancouver, BC Canada V6C 1T2
	www.nevadageothermal.com