alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Notice of Conditional Settlement

-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RICHARD MAC BRIDE, SB# 199695

LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD A. MAC BRIDE

865 Marina Bay Parkway, Suite 43

RICHMOND, CA 94804

Phone 415-730-6289

Fax 510-439-2786

Attorney for Plaintiff Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

_____________________________________

 

Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio, 

 Plaintiff,

Vs.

A Business Enterprise, Inc., et al.,

 

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case Number C17-0707 CRB

NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL 

SETTLEMENT

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the parties have entered into a written agreement conditionally 

settling this action. The parties expect to fulfill the terms of settlement on or before September 30, 

2017. Plaintiff requests that the matter be stayed until that date. Once the terms are fulfilled, 

Plaintiff will promptly file a Notice of Dismissal.

/s/ Richard A. Mac Bride

Richard A. Mac Bride, Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: August 1, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00707-CRB Document 12 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00253

- CV

J. L. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2021

- 0494A , THE HONORABLE MELISSA MCCLENAHAN , J UDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In the above cause, a ppellant J.L. has filed a request for a de novo hearing fr om

the associate judge ’ s finding of “ aggravated circumstances ” under section 262.2015(b)(3)( I ) of

the Texas Family Code

. It app e ars that the request was mistakenly filed and docketed in this

Court as a notice of appeal. 1 A finding of aggravated circumstances in a parental

- termination

case is not a final order, and it does not fall within any of the categories of appealabl e

interl o c utory orders. See Hernandez v. Dep ’ t of Family & Protective Servs. , 392 S.W.3d 188

(Tex. App.

– El Paso 2012, no pet.); see also T ex

. C iv . P rac . & R em . C ode § 51.014

. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

1 This Court requested a response from appellant explaining how this Court may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal

. As of the date of this order , n o response has been received2 __________________ ________________________ Gisela D. Triana , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Kelly

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 29 , 2021
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132249 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132249 COA: 271611 Antrim CC: 05-003913-FH GREGORY JOSEPH HOFFMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 18, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
EX-10.7






Exhibit 10.7



SCHEDULE OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO HAVE ENTERED INTO THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND
RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT 10.6



Each of the following Named Executive Officers has entered into a Form of Employment Agreement as
set forth in Exhibit 10.6 as of the date indicated below:




	 	 	 
	NAME	 	DATE
	David W. Greenfield

	 	December 4, 2008
	John H. Jacko, Jr.

	 	December 8, 2008
	Frank P. Simpkins

	 	December 11, 2008
	Gary W. Weismann

	 	December 11, 2008
EX PARTE James O. WILLIAMS, Jr.

CR-17-0144

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 591 

Expressing support for the designation of April 10, 2022, as ‘‘Venture Smith 

Freedom Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2022 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 10, 2022, 

as ‘‘Venture Smith Freedom Day’’. 

Whereas, in about 1729, Venture Smith was born free in 

West Africa and, in 1739, was seized from his home and 

enslaved in New England; 

Whereas 257 years ago, in the year 1765, Venture Smith, at 

the age of 36, purchased his freedom; 

Whereas Venture Smith went on to free his family from the 

bondage of slavery; 

Whereas Venture Smith became a successful landowner, businessman, and author in the United States, generations 

before Black Americans began to obtain constitutional, 

legal, social, and economic rights; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 591 IS 

Whereas, in November 1798, Venture Smith was the first African American to write and publish his own autobiography; 

Whereas Venture Smith was the first person to write and 

publish the phrase, ‘‘My freedom is a privilege which 

nothing else can equal’’; 

Whereas Venture Smith died a free man on September 19, 

1805, in Connecticut; and 

Whereas April 10 would be an appropriate date to designate 

as ‘‘Venture Smith Freedom Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation 

2 of ‘‘Venture Smith Freedom Day’’ on April 10, which 

3 would recognize the 257th anniversary of Venture Smith 

4 purchasing his freedom and going on to become a land5 owner, businessman, and author in Connecticut. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT

No. C-05-01668 RMW

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

E-FILED on 08/31/09

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and VIA

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (USA),

Defendants.

No. C-05-01668 RMW

AMENDED JUDGMENT

Pursuant to: (1) the court's order of September 23, 2008 granting the motion of VIA

Technologies, Inc. and VIA Technologies, Inc. (USA) (collectively "VIA") for summary judgment

of non-infringement and denying Computer Cache Coherency Corporation's cross-motion for

summary judgment of infringement; (2) the court's order of June 18, 2009 denying Computer Cache

Coherency Corporation's motion for reconsideration; and (3) the stipulation of the parties dated July

29, 2009 whereby VIA dismissed its counterclaims for declaratory judgment of invalidity and

unenforceability without prejudice, 

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 306 Filed 08/31/09 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT

No. C-05-01668 RMW 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor VIA Technologies, Inc. and

VIA Technologies, Inc. (USA) and against Computer Cache Coherency Corporation and that

Computer Cache Coherency Corporation take nothing by way of its complaint.

DATED: 08/31/09

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 306 Filed 08/31/09 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AMENDED JUDGMENT

No. C-05-01668 RMW 3

Notice of this document has been electronically sent to:

Counsel for Plaintiff:

Roderick G. Dorman dormanr@hbdlawyers.com

Lawrence M. Hadley hadleyl@hbdlawyers.com

Omer Salik saliko@hbdlawyers.com

Counsel for Defendants:

Jennifer A. Ochs jochs@wsgr.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not

registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

Dated: 08/31/09 JAS

Chambers of Judge Whyte

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 306 Filed 08/31/09 Page 3 of 3
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00629

- CR

Juan Manuel Deleon

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

o f Ta rrant County (1285696R )

August 14, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s ju dgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

_________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
Dionntez BYNER v. STATE

CR-16-1117

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Oney NICOLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-125

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10096]



[[Page 20268]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. RP95-196-001]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Compliance Filing

April 19, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 13, 1995, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be 
effective April 1, 1995.

Second Revised Sheet No. 395
Second Revised Sheet No. 452
Third Revised Sheet No. 453

    On March 1, 1995, Columbia filed tariff sheets initiating the 
proceeding in Docket No. RP95-196-000 and implementing its annual 
filing pursuant to the Transportation Cost Rate Adjustment (TCRA) 
mechanism in Section 36 of the General Terms and Conditions (GTC) of 
its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1. The Commission issued 
an order in this proceeding on March 30, 1995, accepting and suspending 
those tariff sheets effective April 1, 1995, subject to refund and 
conditions. (See, 70 FERC 61,364 (1995).)
    Columbia states that the instant filing is being made to address 
and comply with Ordering Paragraphs (B), (C), and (D) in that order.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to each 
of its firm customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of 
the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed 
on or before April 26, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedigs. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10096 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### i i i i i i



# MEMORANDUM OPI NIO N No. 04-10-00527- CV IN RE Wil liam B. OZER Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 

## PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J uly 28, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On J uly 19, 2010, rela tor Wil liam B. Ozer filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Howeve r, in o rd er t o be entitled to mandamus relief , rela tor must show the trial court clea rly abused its discretion and rela tor has no adequate reme dy at law. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W .3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004); W alker v. Pack

er , 827 S.W .2d 8 3 3, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). The court has considere d rela tor’s petition and is of the opinion that rela to r i s n o t en t i t led to the relief soug ht beca use re lator has f

ailed to a ddress whether he has an ade quate r emedy by appea l. Accor dingly ,

1 ... T h i s p r o c e e d i n g a r i s e s o u t o f C a u s e N o . 2 0 0 9

- C I
- 1 8 5 6 7 , s t y l e d W i l l i a m B

. O z e r v . T o d d G o l d , e t a l

. , p e n d i n g i n t h e 1 5 0 t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t C o u r t , B e x a r C o u n t y , T e x a s , t h e H o n o r a b l e J a n e t L i t t l e j o h n p r e s i d i n g .0 4

- 1 0

- 0 0 5 2 7
- C V



## rela tor’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENI ED WI THOUT PRE J UD I C E
. T E X 

## . R. A P P 

## . P. 52.8(a)
. PER C URI AM

- 2

-
EX-35.3
Wachovia Securities
201 South College Street
CP9
Charlotte, NC 28244-1075


(logo) WACHOVIA SECURITIES


1123 SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of August 1, 2007, by and among CWCapital Commercial Funding Corporation, as
Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital
Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series Cobalt 2007-C3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used
herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, Timothy Ryan and Marilyn Addison,
Managing Director of Customer Relationship Management and Director of Compliance
Third Party Oversight, do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
   August 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007, and of its performance per the Agreement
   during such period has been made under our supervision; and

2. To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the period August 1, 2007, through December 31, 2007;

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
10th day of March 2008.


/s/ Timothy Ryan
Timothy Ryan, Managing Director
Wachovia Bank National Association

/s/ Marilyn Addison
Marilyn Addison, Director
Wachovia Bank National Association
Tony SHELDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-849

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                       1,804,000
<SECURITIES>                                 5,547,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,558,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   602,000
<INVENTORY>                                    675,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,557,000
<PP&E>                                       3,888,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,692,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,331,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,882,000
<BONDS>                                      1,514,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,268,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,044,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,331,000
<SALES>                                      4,343,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,045,000
<CGS>                                        2,153,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,615,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,732,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                773,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   263,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            510,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   510,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL GOLDMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

BAYER AG, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00647-PJH 

ORDER RE STATUS UPDATE

On January 9, 2019, the court stayed this case in light of the ongoing litigation in 

California Superior Court captioned Brady v. Bayer Corp., No. 2016-00839608 (Orange 

County Sup. Ct.). See Dkt. 58. The court ORDERS the parties to file a joint status report 

regarding the status of the Brady case and the parties’ respective positions on whether 

this case should continue to be stayed. The joint status report shall be filed on or before 

September 27, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2022

/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:17-cv-00647-PJH Document 61 Filed 09/13/22 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.2

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby  consent  the  incorporation  by  reference  of the  previously  filed
Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-35058 and 333-89811) of Frontline
Communications  Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") of our report dated
February  25, 2000  relating to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of the
Company  appearing in the Annual Report of Form 10-KSB for the year December 31,
2000.

                                                       s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                          BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2001
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                                                                       |                                                      |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: July              16, 2007 | By:                                                                                                   | /s/ Michel              St-Pierre     |
|                                  | Name:  Michel                St-PierreTitle:    Chief Financial                Officer |
|                                  |                                                                                                            |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN NYGREN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-07400-VC 

ORDER APPROVING VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 21

In light of the parties' supplemental briefing, the stipulated dismissal – with prejudice as 

to Nygren, and without prejudice as to the other members of the putative class – is granted.

The parties have expressed their intention to abide by a stipulated but unordered deadline 

of April 14 for the plaintiff's motion for fees and expenses. See Dkt. No. 25. If the plaintiff 

wishes to request a brief extension, he will have until April 14 to do so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2017

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Healthcare
      Providers Direct ,
      Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                May 21, 2007
            By:/s/
                Norman ProulxNorman
                ProulxChief
                Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 21028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10657]





                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 21028]] 




Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, May 2, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., NW., Washington DC, 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 95-10657 Filed 4-26-95; 3:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Ronald Jerome HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-911

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.