alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7147

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEVIN SHIONELL JEFFERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00312-REP-2)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Shionell Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Kevin Shionell Jefferson appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Jefferson , No. 3:04-cr-00312-REP-2 (E.D. Va. June 17,

2008)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2014-3





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity,
the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2014 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth
Third Auto Trust 2014-3, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has
been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 29th day of March, 2017.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

BRIAN J. STRETCH, CSBN 163973 

United States Attorney 

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL 

Regional Chief Counsel 

DANIEL P. TALBERT, SBN OH 0084088 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Social Security Administration 

 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 

 San Francisco, CA 94105 

 Telephone: (415) 977-8995 

 Facsimile: (415) 977-8873 

Attorneys for Defendant 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ELSIE ELENA INIGUEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

No. 4:17-cv-00093-KAW 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR A SIXTY-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME 

FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN 

OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Elsie Elena Iniguez (Plaintiff) and Nancy 

A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their 

respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of sixty (60) days to 

deliver her Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment. The current due date is December 4, 2017. The new due date will be February 2, 

2018. The parties further stipulate that all other dates will be extended accordingly. Defendant 

requests this extension because the attorney responsible for briefing this case will need to review 

and learn the more than 1,600 page record, but also has responsibility for handling an arbitration 

this month and litigation before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission this month and 

next month. The attorney assigned to brief this case also has pre-scheduled leave for the 

upcoming holidays, as does the attorney who will be responsible for reviewing the brief. For all 

these reasons, Defendant requires an additional 60 days to prepare and file her Motion for 

Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This request 

is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Date: November 15, 2017 s/ Katherine Siegfried

 KATHERINE SIEGFRIED 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 (by email authorization) 

 BRIAN J. STRETCH 

 United States Attorney 

DATE: November 15, 2017 By s/ Daniel P. Talbert 

 DANIEL P. TALBERT 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 ORDER 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _______________ _______________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTMORE 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

11/17/17
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6465
MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RAYMOND REED, JR., Major; JAMES L. HARVEY, Midlands Regional Director; PATRICIA RAINEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Flor ence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1116-4-21BE) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: July 8, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Reed , No. CA-96- 1116-4-21BE (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Jacinta I. GILLIS, DOC #R86811, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5197 2D16-188

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Terrell RIVERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3743

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 21, 2019

Terrell Rivers, Lake City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Terrell Rivers, appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We affirm in all respects except as to Appellant's claim that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the admission of dispatch logs.

The record before us does not include the portion of the transcript relevant to the admission of the dispatch logs at trial or otherwise definitively reflect the basis for their admission. Therefore, given Appellant's allegations, the attached record does not conclusively refute Appellant's claim. As such, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either hold an evidentiary hearing or to attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim. We otherwise affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20207

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ-HEBERT, also known as Jose Luis Ramirez, also 

known as Jose Luis Ramirez-Herbert, also known as Jose L. Ramirez, also 

known as Manahel Parcio, also known as Armando Ramirez, also known as 

Jose Luis Ramirez-Herbet, also known as Jose Herbert Ramirez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-510-1

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis RamirezHebert has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez-Hebert has not filed a response. We have 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 20, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-20207 Document: 00514353677 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
No. 17-20207

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-20207 Document: 00514353677 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
EXHIBIT 31.1
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 
 I, Thomas A. Vento, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania (the "Registrant"); and
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
  
  Date:
July 1, 2011
/s/Thomas A. VentoThomas A. VentoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10225]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release Nos. 33-7163; 34-35632; File No. 265-20]


Advisory Committee on the Capital Formation and Regulatory 
Processes

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is to give notice that the Securities and Exchange 
Commission Advisory Committee on the Capital Formation and Regulatory 
Processes will meet on May 8, 1995 in room 1C30 at the Commission's 
main offices, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., beginning at 
2:00 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public, and the public is 
invited to submit written comments to the Committee.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted in triplicate and 
should refer to File No. 265-20. Comments should be submitted to 
Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Sirignano, Committee Staff 
Director, at 202-942-2870; Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 10(a) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10a, notice is hereby 
given that the Committee will meet on May 8, 1995 in room 1C30 at the 
Commission's main offices, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 
beginning at 2:00 p.m. The meeting will be open to the public.
    The Committee was formed in February 1995, and its responsibilities 
include advising the Commission regarding the informational needs of 
investors and the regulatory costs imposed on the U.S. securities 
markets.
    The purpose of this meeting will be to discuss the progress of the 
Committee's work, hear presentations on the need for reform of the 
capital formation and regulatory processes, as well as possible 
alternative approaches, and general organizational matters.

    Dated: April 20, 1995.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10225 Filed 4-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Felix A. SILVA-MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-790

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Cenobio Herrera LANZ, aka Bert Herrera, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-50091.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2004.*

Decided April 26, 2004.

Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., R. Stephen Kramer, Esq., Steven J. Olson, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Cenobio Herrera Lanz, Terminal Island, CA, pro se.

James M. Crawford, Esq., Orange, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cenobio Herrera Lanz appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 33-month sentence for wire fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Lanz has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and-a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lanz has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

Lanz’s motion for extension of time to file a supplemental brief is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HCA HEALTHCARE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00134-VKD 

ORDER EXTENDING STAY

The Court stayed this matter on February 22, 2019 to allow plaintiff-relator Zuri Lazard 30 

days to identify new counsel. Dkt. No. 34. On March 22, 2019, Ms. Lazard filed a status report 

representing that she had taken significant steps to secure new counsel and requesting that the stay 

be extended for another 30 days. Good cause having been shown, the Court grants Ms. Lazard’s 

request to extend the stay. 

Ms. Lazard shall file a status report on or before April 24, 2019 advising the Court of the 

status of her efforts to secure new counsel. If she is unable to find substitute counsel, the Court 

will be required to dismiss this action without prejudice to the United States and the State of 

California. Stoner v. Santa Clara Cty. Office of Educ., 502 F.3d 1116, 1125–28 (9th Cir. 2007). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2019

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI

United States Magistrate Judge
Christopher MOSLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-1932

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Craig A.McCollam, the Chief Financial Officer of Dionex Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.   By: /s/ Craig A. McCollam Name: Craig A. McCollamTitle: Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDated: November 8, 2004
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Antione Bernard HILLS, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2503

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 30, 2019

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Benjamin Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Lucas J. Taylor of Sellers, Taylor & Morrison, P.A., Live Oak, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED. *See**Geralds v. State* , 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla. 1996).

Roberts, Rowe, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
#### Laura Ann RAMBALDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, Jean Johnson, Peggy Slattery, Ernest D. Davis, Mayor, individually and as an Official of the City of Mount Vernon, Anne Madden, Officer, individually and as a Police Officer of the City of Mount Vernon, Joseph P. Pizzuti, Captain, individually and as an Official of the City of Mount Vernon, Michael F. Mosca, Chief, individually and as an Official of the City of Mount Vernon, Gertrude La Forgia, Police Commissioner, individually and as an Official of the City of Mount Vernon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-0147.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 13, 2004.

Laura Ann Rambaldi, Riverdale, NY, for Appellant, pro se.

Louis J. Martino, Martino & Weiss, Mt. Vernon, NY, for Appellees.

PRESENT: MESKILL, LEVAD and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

For substantially the reasons stated by Magistrate Judge Yanthis in his thorough Memorandum Order of April 1, 2003, *Rambaldi v. Mount Vernon,*No. 01-cv-03648-GAY (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2003), the judgment of. the District Court is AFFIRMED.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 665 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Seefried, et 

al. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 8 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 2022 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Seefried, et al. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Seefried, et al., Cr. 

No. 21–287, pending in the United States District Court 

for the District of Columbia, the prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 

Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, and from Nate Russell and Diego 

Torres, custodians of records in the Senate Recording 

Studio, a department of the Office of the Sergeant at 

Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 665 ATS 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee 

2 of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, and Nate Rus3 sell and Diego Torres, custodians of records in the Senate 

4 Recording Studio, are authorized to provide relevant testi5 mony in the case of United States v. Seefried, except con6 cerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted. 

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

8 represent Messrs. Schwager, Russell, and Torres, and any 

9 current or former officer or employee of their offices, in 

10 connection with the production of evidence authorized in 

11 section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
exh10-4a.htm


    

      
        Exhibit
10.4(a)

      

       

      Schedule
of Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreements of Named Executive Officers
dated as of January 1, 2009.

      


      
        	
                 

                Name

              	
                 

                Maximum
      SERP Benefit Payable at Retirement

              
	
                 

                Laurence
      M. Downes, President and Chief Executive Officer

              	
                 

                $250,000

              
	
                 

                Mariellen
      Dugan, Senior Vice President and General Counsel

              	
                 

                $125,000

              
	
                 

                Kathleen
      T. Ellis, Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and
      Marketing

              	
                 

                $125,000

              
	
                 

                Glenn
      C. Lockwood, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

              	
                 

                $125,000

              
	
                 

                Joseph
      P. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
      Officer, NJR Energy Services Company

              	
                 

                 

                $125,000
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

 

 

In connection with the annual report of Green Mountain Recovery, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Levi, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Eduard Korsinsky, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

* *

*/s/ Joseph Levi                           *

     Joseph Levi

     Chief Executive Officer

     March 28, 2008

 

*/s/ Eduard Korsinsky                 *

      Eduard Korsinsky

      Chief Financial Officer

    March 28 2008