492 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 1995 / Notices

exemption is administratively feasible,

in the interests of the plan and of its

participants and beneficiaries and

protective of the rights of participants

and beneficiaries of the plan;

(3) The proposed exemptions, if

granted, will be supplemental to, and

not in derogation of, any other

provisions of the Act and/or the Code,

including statutory or administrative

exemptions and transitional rules.

Furthermore, the fact that a transaction

is subject to an administrative or

statutory exemption is not dispositive of

whether the transaction is in fact a

prohibited transaction; and

(4) The proposed exemptions, if

granted, will be subject to the express

condition that the material facts and

representations contained in each

application are true and complete, and

that each application accurately

describes all material terms of the

transaction which is the subject of the

exemption.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of

December, 1994.

Ivan Strasfeld,

Director of Exemption Determinations,

Pension and Welfare Benefits,

Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.

[FR Doc. 95–109 Filed 1–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–29–P

[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 94–82]

Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company

AGENCY: Department of Labor.

ACTION: Notice of technical correction.

On December 5, 1994, the Department

of Labor (the Department) published in

the Federal Register (59 FR 62422) and

individual exemption which permits:

(1) the in-kind transfer of assets of plans

for which Marshall & Ilsley Trust

Company or an affiliate (collectively,

M&I) serves as a fiduciary (the Client

Plans), other than plans established and

maintained by M&I, that are held in

certain collective investment funds

maintained by M&I (the CIFs), in

exchange for shares of the Marshall

Funds, Inc. (the Funds), an open-end

investment company registered under

the Investment Company Act of 1940,

for which M&I acts as investment

adviser, custodian, and/or shareholder

servicing agent, in connection with the

termination of such CIFs; (2) the receipt

of fees by M&I from the Funds for acting

as an investment adviser to the Funds

in connection with the investment by

the Client Plans in shares of the Funds;

and (3) the receipt and proposed

retention of fees by M&I from the Funds

for acting as custodian and shareholder

servicing agent to the Funds as well as

for any other services to the Funds

which are not investment advisory

services (i.e. ‘‘secondary services’’) in

connection with the investment by the

Client Plans in shares of the Funds.

Section I(f) in the first column on 59

FR 62423 should read as follows:

(f) The conditions set forth in

paragraphs (e), (f) and (n) of Section II

below are satisfied.

For Further Information Contact: Mr.

E.F. Williams, of the Department, at

(202) 219–8194.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of

December, 1994.

Ivan L. Strasfeld,

Director, Office of Exemption Determinations,

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–111 Filed 1–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–29–M

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 94–105]

NASA Advisory Council, NASA Federal

Laboratory Review Task Force;

Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and

Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub.

L. 92–463, as amended, the National

Aeronautics and Space Administration

announces a meeting of the NASA

Federal Laboratory Review Task Force

of the NASA Advisory Council.

DATES: January 26, 1995, 12:30 p.m. to

4:15 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and

Space Administration, Program Review

Center, Ninth Floor, Room 9H40, 300 E

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard L. Kline, Code AE, National

Aeronautics and Space Administration,

Washington, DC 20546, 202/358–4697.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

meeting will be open to the public up

to the seating capacity of the room. The

agenda for the meeting is as follows:

—General Findings and

Recommendations

—Aeronautics Enterprise

Recommendations

—Scientific Research Enterprise

Recommendations

—Mission to Planet Earth Enterprise

Recommendations

—Space Technology Enterprise

Recommendations

—Human Exploration and Development

of Space Enterprise Recommendations

—Discussion

It is imperative that the meeting be

held on this date to accommodate the

scheduling priorities of the key

participants. Visitors will be requested

to sign a visitors’ register.

Dated: December 22, 1994.

Timothy M. Sullivan,

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–135 Filed 1–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510–01–M

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: National Endowment for the

Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(Public Law 92–463, as amended),

notice is hereby given that the following

meetings of the Humanities Panel will

be held at the Old Post Office, 1100

Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David C. Fisher, Advisory Committee

Management Officer, National

Endowment for the Humanities,

Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202)

606–8322. Hearing-impaired individuals

are advised that information on this

matter may be obtained by contacting

the Endowment’s TDD terminal on (202)

606–8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

proposed meetings are for the purpose

of panel review, discussion, evaluation

and recommendation on applications

for financial assistance under the

National Foundation on the Arts and the

Humanities Act of 1965, as amended,

including discussion of information

given in confidence to the agency by the

grant applicants. Because the proposed

meetings will consider information that

is likely to disclose: (1) trade secrets and

commercial or financial information

obtained from a person and privileged

or confidential; or (2) information of a

personal nature the disclosure of which

would constitute a clearly unwarranted

invasion of personal privacy, pursuant

to authority granted me by the

Chairman’s Delegation of Authority to

Close Advisory Committee meetings,

dated July 19, 1993, I have determined

that these meetings will be closed to the

public pursuant to subsections (c)(4),

and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United

States Code.

1. Date: January 23, 1995

Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 1995 / Notices 493

Room: 315

Program: This meeting will review

applications for projects in Interpretive

Research: Humanities Studies of

Medicine, submitted to Division of

Research Programs, for projects

beginning after July 1, 1995.

2. Date: January 27, 1995

Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Room: 315

Program: This meeting will review

applications for projects in Interpretive

Research: Humanities Studies of

Technology, Industry and Architecture,

submitted to the Division of Research

Programs, for projects beginning after

July 1, 1995.

3. Date: January 30, 1995

Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Room: 315

Program: This meeting will review

applications for projects in Interpretive

Research: History and Philosophy of

Science, submitted to the Division of

Research Programs, for projects

beginning after July 1, 1995.

David C. Fisher,

Advisory Management Committee Officer.

[FR Doc. 95–11 Filed 1–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7536–01–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50–261]

Carolina Power & Light Company; H.R.

Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit

No. 2; Environmental Assessment and

Finding of No Significant Impact

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (the Commission) is

considering issuance of an amendment

to Facility Operating License No. DPR–

23 issued to Carolina Power & Light

Company (the licensee) for operation of

H.R. Robinson Steam Electric Plant,

Unit No. 2 (HBR), located in Darlington

County, South Carolina.

Environmental Assessment

Identification of Proposed Action

The proposed amendment would

include provisions in Technical

Specifications (TS) 5.3 and 5.4 which

allow for the storage of fuel with an

enrichment not to exceed 4.95 + 0.05 w/

o U–235 in the new and spent fuel

storage racks. The proposed action is in

accordance with the licensee’s

application for amendment dated July

28, 1994.

The Need for Proposal Action

The proposed changes are needed so

that the licensee can use higher fuel

enrichment to provide the flexibility of

extending the fuel irradiation and to

permit operation for longer fuel cycles.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed

Action

The Commission has completed its

evaluation of the proposed revisions to

the TS. The proposed revisions would

permit use of fuel enriched to a nominal

5.0 weight percent Uranium 235. The

safety considerations associated with

reactor operation with higher

enrichment and extended irradiation

have been evaluated by the NRC staff.

The staff has concluded that such

changes would not adversely affect

plant safety. The proposed changes have

no adverse effect on the probability of

any accident. The higher enrichment,

with fuel burnup to 60,000 megawatt

days per metric ton Uranium, may

slightly change the mix of fission

products that might be released in the

event of a serious accident, but such

small changes would not significantly

affect the consequences of serious

accidents. No changes are being made in

the types or amount of any radiological

effluents that may be released offsite.

There is no significant increase in the

allowable individual or cumulative

occupational radiation exposure.

With regard to potential

nonradiological impacts of reactor

operation with higher enrichment and

extended irradiation, the proposed

changes to the TS involve systems

located with the restricted area, as

defined in 10 CFR Part 20. They do not

affect nonradiological plant effluents

and have no other environmental

impact.

The environmental impact of

transportation resulting from the use of

higher enrichment fuel and extended

irradiation were published and

discussed in the staff assessment

entitled, ‘‘NRC Assessment of the

Environmental effect of Transportation

Resulting from Extended Fuel

Enrichment and Irradiation,’’ dated July

7, 1988, and published in the Federal

Register (53 FR 30355) on August 11,

1988. As indicated therein the

environmental cost contribution of the

proposed increase in the fuel

enrichment and irradiation limits are

either unchanged or may, in fact, be

reduced from those summaries in Table

S–4 as set forth in 10 CFR 51.52(c).

Accordingly, the Commission concludes

that there are no significant radiological

environmental impacts associated with

the proposed amendment.

With regard to potential

nonradiological impacts, the proposed

action does involve features located

entirely within the restricted area as

defined in 10 CFR Part 20. It does not

affect non-radiological plant effluents

and has no other environmental impact.

Accordingly, the Commission concludes

that there are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts

associated with the proposed action.

Alternative to the Proposed Action

Since the Commission concluded that

there are no significant environmental

effects that would result from the

proposed action, any other alternative

would have equal or greater

environmental impacts and need not be

evaluated.

The principal alternative would be to

deny the requested amendment. This

would not reduce the environmental

impact of plant operations and would

result in reduced operational flexibility.

Alternative Use of Resources

This action does not involve the use

of any resources not previously

considered in the Final Environmental

Statement related to operation of HBR.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

The NRC staff reviewed the licensee’s

request and did not consult other

agencies or persons.

Finding of No Significant Impact

The Commission has determined not

to prepare an environmental impact

statement for the proposed license

amendments.

Based upon the foregoing

environmental assessment, we conclude

that the proposed action will not have

a significant effect on the quality of the

human environment.

For further details with respect to this

action, see the application for

amendments dated July 28, 1994, that is

available for public inspection at the

Commission’s Public Document Room,

the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street,

NW., Washington, DC 20555, and at the

local public document room for the H.B.

Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No.

2, at Hartsville Memorial Library, 147

West College, Hartsville, South Carolina

29550.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day

of December 1994.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Byron L. Siegel,

Acting Director Project Directorate II–1,

Division of Reactor Projects I/II, Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 95–125 Filed 1–3–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M