alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22403-22404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11031]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development
[Docket No. N-95-1917; FR-3778-N-35]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 5, 1995.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact David Pollack, Department 
of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7254, 451 Seventh Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TDD number for the 
hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers 
are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 
1-800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, [[Page 22404]] identifying unutilized, underutilized, 
excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has 
reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice 
is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have 
been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: April 28, 1995.
Jacquie M. Lawing,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 95-11031 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
FDA 宣布 FSMA 食品追溯追踪最终规则

成分更新

2022 年 11 月 15 日

美国食品和药物监督管理局 (FDA) 于本日发布了一项关于食品追溯追踪的最终规则,旨在促进更

快地识别和迅速从市场上清除可能被污染的食品,从而减少食源性疾病,甚至死亡。

符合最终规则要求的食品将包含在《食品追溯追踪清单》 (FTL) 上。FTL 包括鲜切水果和蔬菜、鲜

蛋、坚果酱,以及某些新鲜水果、新鲜蔬菜、即食熟食沙拉、奶酪和海产品。

最终规则的核心是要求制造、加工、包装或贮存食品的人员保存记录,其中应包括与重大追溯追

踪事件 (CTE) 有关的关键数据元素 (KDE)。受规则约束的企业和农场、零售食品机构和餐馆将被要

求在 24 小时内或在 FDA 同意的合理时间内向 FDA 提供相关信息。

最终规则对某些机构和食品予以了全部和部分豁免,如某些小型生产商、小型零售食品机构和餐

馆、直接向消费者出售食品的农场以及经过某些类型加工工艺而成的食品,等等。

最终规则与当前的行业最佳实践相一致,涵盖了国内公司、零售食品机构、餐馆和农场,以及为

美国消费生产食品的外国公司和农场。

食品追溯追踪最终规则是 FDA 新时代更智能的食品安全蓝图的重要组成部分,是对 FDA 《食品安

全现代化法》 (FSMA) 第 204 条 (d) 款的落实。

如欲了解更多信息:

• 联邦公报通知

• FSMA 食品追溯追踪最终规则

• 食品追溯追踪清单

FDA 宣布 FSMA 食品追溯追踪最终规则 | FDA
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21521-21522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10748]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5200-6]


National Drinking Water Advisory Council; Notice of Open Meeting

    Under Section (1)(a)(2) of Public Law 92-423, ``The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act,'' notice is hereby given that a meeting of the 
National Drinking Water Advisory Council established under the Safe 
Drinking Water Act, as amended (Pub. L. 99-339), will be held at 9:00 
a.m. on May 18, 1995 and at 8:30 a.m. on May 19, 1995, at the Harley 
Hotel of Cincinnati, East Room, 8020 Montgomery Road, Cincinnati, Ohio 
45236. Council Subcommittees will hold their meetings on May 15 and May 
16, 1995, at the EPA Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King, 
Cincinnati, Ohio.
    The purpose of the meeting will be to seek Council advice and 
comments on EPA's recently announced ``Agenda For Action,'' which is 
designed to assess and identify priorities and improve the 
effectiveness of drinking water safety. Issues include: improving 
consumer information; identifying priority contaminants for regulation; 
providing technical assistance for small communities and the protecting 
source waters; identifying flexibilities for states, including 
monitoring approaches; and increasing investment in community drinking 
water facilities.
    The meeting will be open to the public. The Council encourages the 
hearing of outside statements and will allocate a portion of its 
meeting time for public participation. Oral statements will be limited 
to ten minutes. It is preferred that there be only one 
[[Page 21522]] presenter for each statement. Any outside parties 
interested in presenting an oral statement should petition the Council 
by telephone at (202) 260-2285. The petition should include the topic 
of the proposed statement, the petitioner's telephone number and should 
be received by the Council before May 11, 1995.
    Any person who wishes to file a written statement can do so before 
or after a Council meeting. Written statements received prior to the 
meeting will be distributed to the members before any final discussion 
or vote is completed. Statements received after the meeting will become 
part of the permanent meeting file and will be forwarded to the Council 
members for their information.
    Any member of the public wishing to attend the Council meeting, 
present an oral statement, or submit a written statement, should 
contact Ms. Charlene Shaw, Designated Federal Officer, National 
Drinking Water Advisory Council, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (4601), 401 M Street S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20460 or at (202) 260-2285.

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Cynthia C. Dougherty,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 95-10748 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S
Security Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 9, 2006



/s/ Ronald G. FarrellRonald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
D.W.M. v. LEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2161017

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 2018

Affirmed.
Mark JENKINS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10238.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Amendment No.2 to Agreement Relating to Employment



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Amendment No 2 to Agreement Relating to Employment 
 AMENDMENT dated December 22, 2008, by and
between NetScout Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Anil Singhal (“Mr. Singhal”). 
 WHEREAS, the
Company and Mr. Singhal entered into that certain Agreement Relating to Employment, dated January 3, 2007 and as amended on February 2, 2007 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”) ; 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement to change certain provisions with respect to Mr. Singhal’s retirement benefits;

 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend
the Employment Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 6 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 “6. TERMINATION WITHOUT DUE CAUSE. In the event that: (a) Mr. Singhal’s employment is terminated by the Company at any time for any
reason other than Due Cause; or (b) Mr. Singhal terminates his employment with the Company at any time for any reason, the Company’s sole liability to Mr. Singhal will be to pay the amounts set forth in Schedule A hereto
based on the time period calculated in accordance with Schedule A. 
  

	 	2.	This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and shall be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns of the parties. 

  

	 	3.	This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute on and the same instrument.


  

	 	4.	No other terms of the Employment Agreement are deemed modified by this Amendment. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date and year first above written. 
  

			
	NETSCOUT SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David Sommers

		 	David Sommers
		 	CFO, Sr. Vice-President, General Operations


  

	
	Accepted and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ Anil Singhal

	Anil Singhal
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10376]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Cancellation of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the meeting of the 
Acrylonitrile Study Advisory Panel, National Cancer Institute, May 3, 
1995, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Room 418, Rockville, Maryland, which 
was published in the Federal Register on March 17 (60 FR 14439).
    The meeting is being canceled because current pending issues were 
resolved at the March meeting of this Panel and it was decided an 
additional meeting at this time is not necessary.

    Dated: April 20, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10376 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 9

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-9 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
John GANCEDO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-900

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
exv10w25w2







Exhibit 10.25.2




Named Executive Officer Compensation Information – 2009 Salaries and Target Bonus Percentages



The table below provides information regarding the annual base salaries and target bonus
percentages for the Company’s 2008 named executive officers for the 2009 performance period:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	2009 Target Bonus
	Named Executive Officer	 	2009 Annual Base Salary	 	Percentage (1)
	Ronald W. Barrett, PhD
	 	$	500,000	 	 	 	75	%
	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	William G. Harris
	 	$	330,000	 	 	 	40	%
	Senior Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	William J. Rieflin
	 	$	385,000	 	 	 	60	%
	President
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Kenneth C. Cundy, PhD
	 	$	330,000	 	 	 	40	%
	Senior Vice President of
Preclinical Development
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	David R. Savello, PhD
	 	$	330,000	 	 	 	40	%
	Senior Vice President of Development
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 








 




			
	(1)	 	Represents a percentage of 2009 annual base salary pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the XenoPort, Inc. Corporate Bonus Plan.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00557

- CR

Damontray Rivers
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 426th District Court of Bell County , Texas Trial Cause No. 76984

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

app eal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
June 21, 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6388

WILLIAM D. MARSHALL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DOUGLAS C. DEVENYNS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(CA-02-3922-L)

Submitted: May 28, 2003 Decided: July 9, 2003

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William D. Marshall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William D. Marshall seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief without prejudice on his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2241 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Marshall has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER                 
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David K. Ryan, the Principal Accounting Officer of Yaterra
Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                   

| | By:    | /s/ David K. Ryan           
| | ------ | ----------------------------
| |        |                             
| | Name:  | DAVID K. RYAN               
| |        |                             
| | Title: | Principal Accounting Officer
| |        |                             
| | Date:  | December 14, 2009           
| |        |                             

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Arthur Lee PIERSON, Jr., petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-8425.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
BLACK POINT ASSETS, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Stephanie L. ROOME, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1534

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1



Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (formerly Liberty Silver Corp.) (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
John Ryan, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/
    John Ryan                                                  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Chief
    Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Director | 
|Date:
    October 16, 2019                                         |
July 10, 2018

Randy and Karen Sowers

South Mountain Creamery, LLC 

c/o Justin Pearson

Institute for Justice

2 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Suite 3180

Miami, FL 33131

Via Hard Copy

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Sowers:

I write to notify you of the United States Food and Drug Administration' s (FDA) position regarding South 

Mountain Creamery, LLC' s (SMC) desire to distribute milk from which the fat has been removed and to 

which vitamins A and D have not been added.

FDA does not object to the distribution of non-fat, or skim, milk without added vitamins A or D based on

the absence of those vitamins if the product is prominently labeled to notify consumers that the product 

does not contain vitamins A and D in one of the following ways: (a) "Non-fortified skim milk, 0% DV 

vitamins A&D"; (b) "Non-fortified non-fat milk, 0% DV vitamins A&D"; (c) "Skim milk, 0% DV 

vitamins A&D"; or (d) " Non-fat milk, 0% DV vitamins A&D." The agency does not intend to take any 

action to require non-fat or skim milk without added vitamins A or D to be labeled as " imitation" based on 

the absence of added vitamins or to require such non-fat or skim milk to comply with 21 C.F.R. § 

130.10(b) with respect to fortification with vitamins A and D.

The agency has prepared the above options based on our understanding that SMC wishes to use the limited

space available on its bottlecaps to identify the absence of vitamins A and D because SMC distributes its

various milk products using the same reusable bottles. As such, the above-described options are not

necessarily an exhaustive list of labeling options for non-fortified non-fat, or skim, milk, and we remain

open to discussing other labeling options with SMC (or any other entity that wants to distribute nonfortified non-fat, or skim, milk) if necessary.

I also want to let you know that, based on a search of our records, we have not identified a single instance

U.S. Food and Drug Administration 

Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition

5001 Campus Drive

College Park, MD 20740 

www.fda.gov
Page 2 - Mr. and Mrs. Sowers

where FDA sought to take enforcement action against any entity for misbranding food based on the 

distribution of non-fat or skim milk to which vitamins A or D had not been added.

Sjncerely,

/S/ 

Susan T. Mayne, Ph.D. 

Director

Center for Food Safety 

and Applied Nutrition

cc: Russell C. Redding

Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture
Amendment to the Key Employees Savings and Investment Plan



 Exhibit 10.15 
 BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION 
 FORM 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended December 28, 2008

 AMENDMENT TO THE KEY EMPLOYEES SAVINGS 
 AND INVESTMENT PLAN 







 Amendment to Briggs & Stratton Corporation 
 Key Employee Savings and Investment Plan 
 WHEREAS, the Briggs & Stratton Key Employee Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”) provides that if any provision or term thereof would be prohibited by or inconsistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code, then such provision or term shall be deemed to be reformed to comply with Section 409A of the Code; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company’s legal counsel has advised that the disability exception to the five year delay in payment rule resulting from a change in a distribution election would be viewed by the IRS as inconsistent with the requirements
of Section 409A of the Code and, therefore, it is desirable to revise the Plan document to reflect its reformation to eliminate such provision; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the action of the undersigned officer, Section 6.2(f) of the Plan is amended by deleting all of the text thereof after the word “death” in the second line thereof and the
Plan document shall be restated to reflect this change. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of Briggs & Stratton
Corporation executes this amendment on its behalf this 10th day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas R. Savage

	Title:	 	Senior Vice President - Administration