alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Rikam Ikkesh Dozier, Petitioner, 

v. 

State of South Carolina, Respondent. 

Appellate Case No. 2014-000694 

Appeal from Lexington County 

Edgar W. Dickson, Post-Conviction Relief Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2016-MO-002 

Submitted December 1, 2015 – Filed February 3, 2016 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

Aimee Jendrzejewski Zmroczek, of Columbia, for 

Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan Wilson and Assistant Attorney 

General Patrick Lowell Schmeckpeper, both of 

Columbia, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the denial of Petitioner 

Rikam Dozier's application for post-conviction relief. After careful consideration 

of the Appendix and briefs, the writ of certiorari is 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting 

Justice Jean H. Toal, concur.
## NUMBER S 13
- 2 3
- 00 22 7
- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ EDNA MASONIC LODGE #767 , Appellant,

v.
DAMON MOORE THE CHIEF APPRAISER JACKSON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT , Appellee.

_ ___________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 267th District Court of Jackson County, Texas.

_ ___________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides
This cause is before the Court on a joint motion for disposition and appellant’s

motion to waive fees

. The parties , having reached an agreement to compromise and

settle their differences , request entry of an agreed judgment

. The joint motion is construed as a joint motion to vacate and remand. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P RO

. 43.2 (e).2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to vacate

and remand , is of the opinion that the motion should be granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.1(a). We vacate the subject o rder, without reference to the merits, dismiss the appeal , and remand the case to the trial court for entry of the agreed , final judgment , in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2 (d), (e). Additionally, and i n accordance with the parties ’ agreement , we grant the motion

to waive costs in part and deny in part. A ll costs already incurred in the appeal will be taxed against the party incurring the same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d)

. Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and t here

shall be no future costs in assessed by this Court.

GINA M. BENAVIDES Justice

Delivered and filed on the 6th day of July , 20 2 3

.
Michael Ryan SOUTH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10062.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Xiaoling Chen, Chief Accounting Officer Secretary of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




|/s/ Xiaoling ChenXiaoling Chen
Chief Accounting Officer and Secretary
November 14, 2007
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10239]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Semtech Corporation, Common Stock, $.01 Par Value) 
File No. 1-6395

April 20, 1995.
    The Semtech Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, its Board of Directors unanimously 
approved resolutions on March 2, 1995 to withdraw the Security from 
listing on the Amex and, instead, list the Security on the Nasdaq/NMS. 
The decision of the Board followed a lengthy study of the matter, and 
was based upon the belief that listing of the Security on the Nasdaq/
NMS will be more beneficial to its stockholders than the present 
listing on the Amex because:
    (a) The support of Market Makers on the Nasdaq (as compared to the 
activities of the AMEX specialist) and the potential for research 
coverage and other financial services will be advantageous;
    (b) The greater visibility of the Nasdaq with various media 
coverage will be advantageous;
    (c) The potential for the Company to be promoted as a growth-
oriented, diversified company is enhanced on the Nasdaq, given the 
Nasdaq's history;
    (d) There is potentially more capital support for the Company in 
the Nasdaq given the Market Maker's responsibilities; and
    (e) The services the Nasdaq offers that have been reviewed are more 
likely to assist the Company in communicating with shareholders and 
understanding the market.
    Any interested person may, on or before May 11, 1995, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the Amex 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10239 Filed 4-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Timothy D. MOORE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0216

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Xonia BOOK, Appellant, v. Melissa MERKLINGER and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts USA, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-864

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Darrin Dewin HOUSTON, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 12-9536.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.
Tony L. SMITH, DC #H08985, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3570

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Steve Bolton, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Carolyn River Projects Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Carolyn River
      Projects Ltd. for the period ended February 29, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Carolyn River Projects Ltd.                                                                      

Dated: April 14, 2008

| | /s/
      Steve Bolton                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | Steve Bolton, President and Chief Executive
      Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Carolyn River
Projects Ltd. and will be retained by Carolyn River Projects Ltd. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Paul W. Mobley, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noble Roman's,
         Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (that registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:                        /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Paul W. Mobley
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2






1.
    
    Dionex Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008,
to which this Certification is attached (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.


|    |                       |                                                   |  | 
|--- | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: | /s/ Craig A. McCollam |                                                   | 
|    | Name:                 | Craig A. McCollam                                 |  | 
|    | Title:                | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|    | Date:                 | February 6, 2009                                  |  |
#### Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Angi Nicole MORRIS, Attorney At Law; Gilmer, Sadler, Ingram, Sutherland & Hutton, L.L.P., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-2500.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 23, 2004.

Decided May 11, 2004.

Rodney Victor Harris, Appellant pro se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn, Memmer & Dillon, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia; Phillip Verne Anderson, Kevin Osborne Barnard, Frith, Anderson & Peake, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Harris’s motions for a stay, to supplement the record with circuit court transcripts, and for a continuance, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Harris v. Morris,*No. CA-03-560-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               RULE 13A-14(B) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Textron Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen A. Giliotti, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        Textron Financial Corporation

                                        /s/ Stephen A. Giliotti
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Stephen A. Giliotti
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 7, 2003

                                       33
[Letterhead of KPMG]

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm              Exhibit 34.1.6

 

The Board of Directors

Citibank, N.A.:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Citibank, N.A. (the Custodian) complied with servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB in connection with the servicing of residential mortgage loans (other than loans held for its own portfolio) for which the Custodian performs a particular servicing function pursuant to a custodial agreement covering transactions that are serviced on the Citilink, Mortgageserv, and Fidelity servicing platforms (the Platform), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Custodian’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessmentabout the Custodian’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Custodian’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Custodian processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Custodian during the period covered by this report. Our procedureswere not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Custodian during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Custodian’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Custodian complied with certain servicing criteria outlined in Exhibit A in the accompanying Management Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri

February 22, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<CASH>                                           11809
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1972
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  8700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      95766
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         207960
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  340379
<DEPOSITS>                                      298166
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3352
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       31361
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  340379
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  12692
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4222
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   627
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 17541
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                6613
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6613
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            10928
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      675
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   8159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5406
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        5406
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3654
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.61
<LOANS-NON>                                       1017
<LOANS-PAST>                                       524
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    94
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   3591
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3530
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      489
<RECOVERIES>                                       176
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3892
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1244
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           2648


</TABLE>