21554 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 1995 / Notices

By the Commission, David M. Konschnik,

Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10785 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–P

[Ex Parte No. 388 (Sub-No. 5)]

Intrastate Rail Rate Authority—Georgia

AGENCY: Interstate Commerce

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of provisional

recertification.

SUMMARY: The State of Georgia has filed

an application for recertification. The

Commission, under State Intrastate Rail

Rate Authority, 5 I.C.C.2d 680, 685

(1989), provision-ally recertifies the

State of Georgia to regulate intra-state

rail rates, classifications, rules, and

practices. After its review, the

Commission will issue a recertification

decision or take other appropriate

action.

DATES: This provisional recertification

will be effective on May 2, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elaine Sehrt-Green (202) 927–5269 or

Beryl Gordon (202) 927–5610 [TDD for

hearing impaired: (202) 927–5721].

Decided: April 26, 1995.

By the Commission, David M. Konschnik,

Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10784 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Information Collection Under Review

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has been sent the following

collection(s) of information proposals

for review under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

Chapter 35) and the Paperwork

Reduction Reauthorization Act since the

last list was published. Entries are

grouped into submission categories,

with each entry containing the

following information:

(1) The title of the form/collection;

(2) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection;

(3) Who will be asked or required to

respond, as well as a brief abstract;

(4) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond;

(5) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection; and,

(6) An indication as to whether

Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96–511

applies.

Comments and/or suggestions

regarding the item(s) contained in this

notice, especially regarding the

estimated public burden and associated

response time, should be directed to the

OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on (202)

395–7340 and to the Department of

Justice’s Clearance Officer, Mr. Robert B.

Briggs, on (202) 514–4319. If you

anticipate commenting on a form/

collection, but find that time to prepare

such comments will prevent you from

prompt submission, you should notify

the OMB reviewer and the Department

of Justice Clearance Officer of your

intent as soon as possible. Written

comments regarding the burden

estimate or any other aspect of the

collection may be submitted to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Office of Management and Budget,

Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr.

Robert B. Briggs, Department of Justice

Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/

Information Resources Management/

Justice Management Division Suite 850,

WCTR, Washington, DC 20530.

Reinstatement with changes, of a

previously approved collection for

which approval has expired.

(1) 1995 Census of State and Federal

Adult Correctional Facilities.

(2) Form CJ–43. Bureau of Justice

Statistics, Office of Justice Programs,

United States Department of Justice.

(3) Primary=Federal, State, local or

Tribal Government. Others=None. This

1995 Census of State and Federal

Correctional Facilities will provide

current information on inmate

population and correctional facilities

throughout the country, including

inmate growth and its effects on

confinement space and facility building

plans. The last census was conducted in

1990. Respondents are State and Federal

correctional administrators.

(4) 1,400 annual respondents at 1.0

hours per response.

(5) 1,400 annual burden hours.

(6) Not applicable under Section

3504(h) of Public Law 96–511.

Public comment on this item is

encouraged.

Dated: April 26, 1995.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 95–10687 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50–397]

Washington Public Power Supply

System, Nuclear Project No. 2; Notice

of Issuance of Environmental

Assessment and Finding of No

Significant Impact

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (the Commission) is

considering issuance of an amendment

to Facility Operating License No. NPF–

21, issued to Washington Public Power

Supply System, (the licensee), for

operation of the Nuclear Project No. 2,

located in Benton County, Washington.

Environmental Assessment

Identification of the Proposed Action

This Environmental Assessment is

written in connection with the proposed

core uprate for the Nuclear Project No.

2 in response to the licensee’s

application dated July 9, 1993, as

supplemented by letters of October 9,

and October 25, 1993, January 6,

February 2, May 3, May 13, September

26, and October 12, 1994. The proposed

action would increase the rated core

power level for Nuclear Project No. 2

from the current level of 3323

Megawatts-thermal (MWt) to 3486 MWt.

The Nuclear Steam Supply System

(NSSS) power level would be increased

accordingly. This uprate represents an

authorized thermal power level increase

of approximately 4.9 percent. This will

require resetting of the safety relief

valve setpoints to accommodate the

slight operating pressure increase (less

than 20 psi). Operating temperature will

also increase slightly (less than 5 °F).

The result of these changes will be an

approximate 5 percent increase in rated

steam flow. Plant instrumentation will

be recalibrated to reflect the uprated

power. The licensee will implement

these changes during the current

refueling outage, which began on April

22, 1995.

These changes will be achieved by (1)

increasing the core thermal power to

increase steam flow, (2) increasing

reactor pressure to ensure adequate

turbine control margin, (3) not

increasing the current maximum core

flow, and (4) operating the reactor along

higher flow control lines. The increased

core power will be achieved by utilizing

a flatter radial power distribution while

still maintaining limiting fuel bundles

within their constraints.

The Need for the Proposed Action

The proposed action would increase

the thermal output by 163 MWt, which