alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Robert N. Stephens, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Adaptec, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|                             | /s/ ROBERT N.  STEPHENS   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | Robert N. Stephens        |
| Date: February 7, 2005 | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
SCWC-18-0000350

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

CHARLY HERNANE, also known as CHARLIE HERNANE,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000350; CR. NO. 11-1-0699)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and 

Circuit Judge Ayabe, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Charly Hernane, also 

known as Charlie Hernane’s application for writ of certiorari 

filed on June 28, 2019, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled 

for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the 

appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 9, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Bert I. Ayabe

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000350

09-AUG-2019

01:32 PM
Amendment No. 3 to Capital Support Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 
 CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 3 (the “Amendment”) to the Capital Support Agreement, is made as
of the 26th day of January 2009, by and between the Northern Trust Corporation (the “Support Provider”) and Northern Trust Global Funds
plc (the “Company”) on behalf of its sub-fund The U.S. Dollar Fund (the “Fund”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Capital Support Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of February 21, 2008 and amended the Agreement on July 15, 2008 and 29th September 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties
desire to further amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein; 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to
be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings
assigned to them in the Agreement. 
 2. Section 3(c) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth
below: 
 (iii) 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 6, 2009. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this
Amendment No. 3 to the Capital Support Agreement to be executed this 26th day of January 2009. 
  

			
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ William R. Dodds, Jr.

	Name:	 	William R. Dodds, Jr.
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	50 South LaSalle Street
	Chicago
	Illinois 60675
	United States of America
	
	NORTHERN TRUST GLOBAL FUNDS PLC FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE U.S. DOLLAR FUND
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Boyce

	Name:	 	Michael Boyce
	Title:	 	Director
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	George’s Court
	54-62 Townsend Street
	Dublin 2
	Ireland
|   | (1) |  the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 12, 2010 | /s/ David M. Daniels                                |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                    | David M. Daniels                                    |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |                                                |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10375]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Meeting of the Board of 
Scientific Counselors

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute on Aging, May 
22-23, 1995, to be held at the Gerontology Research Center, Baltimore, 
Maryland. The meeting will be open to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 
12:30 p.m. and from 1:30 to 5:30 p.m. on Monday, May 22; and from 9:30 
a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 23. 
Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(6), 
Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the meeting will be 
closed to the public on May 22 from 8:30 to 9:30 a.m.; 12:30 to 1:30 
p.m.; and from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m.; and on May 23 from 8:30 to 9:30 a.m.; 
from 12:30 to 1:30 p.m.; and from 3:30 p.m. to adjournment for the 
review, discussion, and evaluation of individual programs and projects 
conducted by the National Institute on Aging, NIH, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Ms. June C. McCann, Committee Management Officer, NIA, Gateway 
Building, Room 2C218, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301/496-9322), will provide a summary of the meeting and a 
roster of committee members upon request.
    Dr. Edward Lakatta, Acting Scientific Director, NIA, Gerontology 
Research Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, will 
furnish substantive program information.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the Scientific Director in advance of the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10375 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20964-20965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10522]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Determination Not To Revoke Countervailing Duty Orders

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Import Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

 [[Page 20965]] ACTION: Notice of determination not to revoke 
countervailing duty orders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is notifying the 
public of its determination not to revoke the countervailing duty 
orders listed below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Albright or Maria MacKay, Office 
of Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On January 31, 1995, the Department published in the Federal 
Register (60 FR 5901) its intent to revoke the countervailing duty 
orders listed below. Under 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii), the Secretary of 
Commerce will conclude that an order is no longer of interest to 
interested parties and will revoke the order if no domestic interested 
party (as defined in sections 355.2(i)(3), (i)(4), (i)(5), and (i)(6) 
of the regulations), objects to revocation and no interested party 
requests an administrative review by the last day of the fifth 
anniversary month.
    Within the specified time frame, we received an objection from a 
domestic interested party to our intent to revoke these countervailing 
duty orders. Therefore, because the requirements of 19 CFR 
355.25(d)(4)(iii) have not been met, we will not revoke these orders.
    This determination is in accordance with 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4).

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Countervailing duty orders                                
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peru: Cotton Sheeting and Sateen (C-331-001)..........  02/01/83        
                                                        48 FR 4501      
Thailand: Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings (C-549-803)....  02/10/89        
                                                        54 FR 6439      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-10522 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Cavin Burns MCKEN, DOC #S40632, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4754

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00185-CV

In re Texas Department of Criminal Justice

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

and accompanying motion for emergency relief from the district court’s March 27, 2014 temporary

restraining order in a pending suit to compel disclosure of information under the Public Information

Act. The requestors have filed an emergency responsive brief. The order compels disclosure of

the requested information to a limited group of attorneys, with further limitations on their use or

disclosure of the information. We deny the mandamus petition and dismiss as moot the request for

emergency relief. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 552.322.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Filed: March 28, 2014
Case 4:17-cr-00076-PJH Document 7 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          734,242
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            734,242
<EQUITIES>                                       4,937
<MORTGAGE>                                       2,413
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 769,049
<CASH>                                          38,385
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             214,007
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          47,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,187,439
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                577,033
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 229,962
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           85,364
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 71,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           468
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,187,439
<PREMIUMS>                                     166,248
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             42,693
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 144
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   4,982
<BENEFITS>                                     113,895
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     13,013
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,916
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEWIS DOMINIC SHAW,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. THOMAS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00462-YGR (PR)

NOTICE REGARDING INABILITY TO 

SERVE DEFENDANTS DORFMAN AND 

GEORGE

This Order addresses issues regarding service in the above-captioned action. Service has 

been ineffective on Defendants Dorfman and C. George. The Court has been informed by the 

prison as follows: (1) “no forwarding address” exists for Defendant Dorfman because he has 

“moved to Fuji”; and (2) prison officials have been “unable to find a current or former employee 

with the name C. George.” Dkt. 13.

As Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he is responsible for providing the Court with 

current addresses for all Defendants so that service can be accomplished. See Walker v. Sumner, 

14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994); Sellers v. United States, 902 F.2d 598, 603 (7th Cir. 1990). 

While Plaintiff may rely on service by the United States Marshal, “a plaintiff may not remain 

silent and do nothing to effectuate such service. At a minimum, a plaintiff should request service 

upon the appropriate defendant and attempt to remedy any apparent defects of which [he] has 

knowledge.” Rochon v. Dawson, 828 F.2d 1107, 1110 (5th Cir. 1987). If the marshal is unable to 

effectuate service and the plaintiff is so informed, the plaintiff must seek to remedy the situation or 

face dismissal of the claims regarding that defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (providing that if service of the summons and complaint is not made 

upon a defendant in 90 days after the filing of the complaint, the action must be dismissed without 

prejudice as to that defendant absent a showing of “good cause”); see also Walker, 14 F.3d at 

1421-22 (prisoner failed to show cause why prison official should not be dismissed under Rule 

4(m) because prisoner did not prove that he provided marshal with sufficient information to serve 

official). 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

No later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff must provide 

the Court with current addresses for Defendants Dorfman and George. Plaintiff should review the 

federal discovery rules, Rules 26-37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for guidance about 

how to determine the current address of these Defendants.

If Plaintiff fails to provide the Court with the current addresses of Defendants Dorfman 

and George within the twenty-eight-day deadline, all claims against these Defendants will be 

dismissed without prejudice under Rule 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Court Judge

August 15, 2017
!"# $$$$$$$$$$"!$$$$$$$$$$























%&'()*(++,-. 	 	

/0+0)1')*,-. 2344562786797:8;8<79:=856 >,/0+0)1')*?-@)'A0@')1@'11B0--.

C#D!EFG	 H#
EG!""!#GF#EGG"EI"EG!G "#E"EFGJ"!!""KG!#EE"DELE			 M	

"NIG"#K!!C"##EK"E"
! #LE"!M"E"	#C""D"E#K!!"K!!O"GJ C#EEE"">

!G!"KEJPEFDGE!CD"EFG!"#"!EEE#K	Q!G"C""C##"	

RSTUV@WX@RWYUZ > [(\)'*]B0@^+@R&0B_@^B@/0`]*a@R&0B_

bcdefgdhijkedjlecmnopjmcdhjo qrstuvwrxyz{|r}wt~rx~~w



  ¡¢£¤¤¥¦§ £¥¤¤ ̈ ©a¡« 

¬­® ̄°±23 ́±­μ¶·­ ̧μ 1o»1⁄41⁄2μ3⁄4 ́ ̄±¶¿¿À ÁÂÃÄÅμ ̄®°±» ̄1⁄4Æ1®°μÇ°ÈÃ1⁄4ÉÊo1⁄21⁄2± Ë­»1⁄4À­o1⁄21o1⁄41⁄2ÈÌ1 ÂÍÎÄÎ

Case 3:16-cv-07213-SK Document 3 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 2
	

MF
 	 ÏÐ55Ñ75Ñ72ÒÐ;8:Ò ÓÔÕÖ×Ø×ÙÚÛÖÜÝØ×ÕÜÞßàØÝÜÛØáÙØâÖßÙàØãÖÛÕØÛÕÙØÚÜÞäÛØÞÝßÙ××ØäÙåÞÖäÙàØáæØçÙàèØéèØêÖëèØìèØíØÓßîî #!",)'A0@^+@()1(ï(1]'&@')1@*(*&0ð@(+@')a. C"EDG,1'*0. 	

ñ K"G"E##EE@,`&'ò0.,1'*0. ó" ñ !##EEO"E"K!DEC#,)'A0. JK"!DFEE"C#"E#"J ,1'*0. JEEKG#EEOôCEE"ó" ñ "E#,)'A0@^+@()1(ï(1]'&. JC# EFEDGCK"!K"D#!!,)'A0@^+@^B\')(õ'*(^). ,1'*0. ó" ñ ""E#öED ó" ñ #",-`0ò(+a.÷ 	

øG!"ù !""Eù !""J!"!ù 	 E"E"KG!K"P"G##!""	 > [0Bï0B?-@-(\)'*]B0

%B()*01@)'A0@')1@*(*&0

[0Bï0B?-@'11B0-- EE!""F"EFKE"J>

úûúú

Case 3:16-cv-07213-SK Document 3 Filed 12/16/16 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10741]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 042595E]


Marine Mammals and Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Receipt of application for a scientific research permit 
(P771#72).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the National Marine Mammal 
Laboratory, has applied in due form for a permit to take the marine 
mammals listed below for the purpose of scientific research.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 1, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The application and related documents are available for 
review upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau AK 99802-1668 
(907/586-7221);
    Written data or views, or requests for a public hearing on this 
request, should be submitted to the Chief, Permits Division, F/PR1, 
Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MD 20910, within 30 days 
of the publication of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Barone, (301/713-2289).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Those individuals requesting a hearing 
should set forth the specific reasons why a hearing on this particular 
request would be appropriate.
    Concurrent with the publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, the Secretary of Commerce is forwarding copies of this 
application to the Marine Mammal Commission and its Committee of 
Scientific Advisors.
    The subject permit is requested under the authority of the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and 
the Regulations Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals 
(50 CFR part 216).
    The applicant seeks authorization to biopsy sample 120 beluga 
whales (Delphinapterus leucas) and conduct genetic and dietary analyses 
on the samples over a 3-year period. In addition, the applicant seeks 
authorization to take by harassment up to 2,000 beluga whales 
incidental to the sampling. Proposed taking will be by small boat. 
Field work will be conducted from July, 1995 through October, 1998 in 
Cook Inlet, Norton Sound, Bristol Bay, Kotzebue Sound, and Beaufort 
Sea, on the west coast of Alaska. The results of the research will 
provide information on the stock boundaries.

    Dated: April 20, 1995.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits & Documentation Division, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 95-10741 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
David E. MILLER, petitioner, v. Roland COLSON, Warden.

No. 12-9414.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.