alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-12051]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM95-5-34-001]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 11, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 10, 1995, Florida Gas Transmission Company 
(FGT) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revision Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Substitute 4th Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A
Substitute 3rd Revised Original Sheet No. 8A.02

    On May 1, 1995, FGT filed tariff sheets in Docket No. TM95-5-34-000 
to make out-of-cycle adjustments to both the Current Fuel Reimbursement 
Charge and the Annual Fuel Surcharge (Fuel Filing) proposed to become 
effective June 1, 1995. Contained in this filing were tariff sheets 
including 4th Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A and 3rd Revised 
Original Sheet No. 8A.02. The revisions to these tariff sheets were 
redlined from 3rd Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A and 2nd Revised 
Original Sheet No. 8A.02, which were also filed on May 1, 1995 in 
Docket Nos. TM94-4-34-006 and RP95-259-000 and also proposed to become 
effective on June 1, 1995. Subsequently, FGT has become aware that it 
inadvertently failed to revise 3rd Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A 
and 2nd Revised Original Sheet No. 8A.02 to reflect the elimination of 
the Annual Unit Take-Or-Pay Surcharge from the maximum usage charges 
and associated footnotes.
    Therefore, concurrent with the instant filing, FGT is filing 
Substitute 3rd Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A and Substitute 2nd 
Revised Original Sheet No. 8A.02 in Docket Nos. TM94-4-34-007 and RP95-
259-001 to correct this oversight. In the instant filing, FGT is making 
conforming changes to the referenced tariff sheets filed herewith.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a motion 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 in accordance with 
Sec. 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such 
protests should be filed on or before May 18, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-12051 Filed 5-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Office of Partnerships

Division of Standards Implementation

1

CONTACT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE OF PARTNERSHIPS

Division of Integration (DI)

April 1, 2023

Immediate Office

Integration Group

Employee 

Name

Title Duty 

Station Contact Information Assignments

Tim Mueller Division 

Director

Element Bldg 

4028 

Rockville, 

MD

Office/Cell: 301-796-8775

Timothy.Mueller@fda.hhs.gov

Deborah 

Nebzenzahl

Consumer 

Safety Officer Alameda, CA

Office/Cell: 510-846-3303

Deborah.Nebenzahl@fda.hhs.gov

• IFSS 

Assessment 

Project

• Domestic 

Mutual Reliance

Priscilla 

Neves

Consumer 

Safety Officer

Stoneham, 

MA

Office/Cell: 781-587-7424

Priscilla.Neves@fda.hhs.gov

• Domestic 

Mutual Reliance

Mari 

Carpenter, 

MPH

Public Health 

Advisor

Gaithersburg, 

MD

Office/Cell: 301-796-0689

Mari.Carptenter@fda.hhs.gov

• Domestic 

Mutual Reliance

Employee 

Name

Title Duty Station Contact Information Assignments

Rebeca 

Dreisch

Manager, 

Integration 

Group

Element Bldg 

4022 

Rockville, MD

Cell: 301-651-4453

Rebecca.Dreisch@fda.hhs.gov

Ilyse Garman

Program 

Analyst

Annapolis, MD

Office/Cell: 240-276-9467

Ilyse.Garman@fda.hhs.gov 

• IFSS 

Assessment 

Project

Jessica 

Kimbrough

Consumer 

Safety 

Officer

Fairfield, CA

Office/Cell: 510-775-4531

Jessica.Kimbrough@fda.hhs.gov

• IFSS 

Assessment 

Project

Suzzette Kuhn 

(Away on 

Detail)

Program 

Analyst Indianapolis, IN

Office/Cell: 317-292-1755

Suzzette.Kuhn@fda.hhs.gov

• IFSS 

Assessment 

Project

Heika Tait

Consumer 

Safety 

Officer

Puyallup, WA

Office/Cell: 206-696-0250

Heika.Tait@fda.hhs.gov

• IFSS 

Assessment 

Project
Office of Partnerships

Division of Standards Implementation

2

International & Federal Engagement Group

Employee 

Name

Title Duty Station Contact Information Assignments

Francis 

Kalush, Ph.D.

Manager, 

International & 

Federal 

Engagement 

Group

Element Bldg 

4020 

Rockville, MD

Office/Cell: 240-762-2639

Francis.Kalush@fda.hhs.gov

Tammy 

Hancock, 

MBA

Consumer 

Safety Officer Signal Hill, CA

Office/Cell: 562-256-9245

Tammy.Hancock@fda.hhs.gov 

• International 

& Federal 

Engagement

David Kelly, 

MPH Program Analyst Savannah, GA

Office/Cell: 301-796-8775

David.Kelly@fda.hhs.gov 

• International 

& Federal 

Engagement

John Sproul, 

Ph.D.

Consumer 

Safety Officer Lynden, WA

Office/Cell: 360-618-2356

John.Sproul@fda.hhs.gov

• International 

& Federal 

Engagement

Jay Wong, 

MPH

Program

Management New York, NY

Office/Cell: 718-662-5714

Jay.Wong@fda.hhs.gov 

• International 

& Federal 

Engagement
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**  **AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Thomas E. Hales, as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas M. Buonaiuto, as Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on
      his knowledge that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
              Thomas E.
              Hales
            
            
            Date:
              May 10,
              2007Thomas
              E. HalesChief
                Executive Officer





/s/
              Thomas M.
              Buonaiuto
            
            
            Date:
              May 10,
              2007Thomas
              M. BuonaiutoChief
              Financial
              Officer


*This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*
3/9
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00119-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.E., a Child

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012EM504169

Honorable Jim Rausch, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 3, 2013

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On February 21, 2013, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that 

the clerk’s record had not been filed in this appeal because appellant had failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to 

appeal without paying the fee. Appellant was ordered to provide written proof to this court by 

February 13, 2013, that either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been made 

to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. This 

court’s order cautioned that if appellant failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal 

would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).
04-13-00119-CV

- 2 -

Appellant did not respond to this court’s order. Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is 

dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Costs of the appeal are taxed against 

appellant.

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1594

BRENDA P. LOWDER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Defendant - Appellee,

 and

GROUP BENEFIT PLAN; FARMER'S TELEPHONE

COOPERATIVE, INCORPORATED,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CA-02-1355-4-23)

Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: May 11, 2005

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chalmers C. Johnson, CHALMERS JOHNSON LAW FIRM, Charleston, South

Carolina, for Appellant. Debbie W. Harden, Katherine T. Lange,

WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellee.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Brenda P. Lowder appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on her claim seeking disability benefits from a plan

governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Lowder v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.,

No. CA-02-1355-4-23 (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00443-CR

Anthony Ornelas APOLINAR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5525

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 27, 2018.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Case 3:17-cr-00021-WHO Document 6 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 1
Darrell WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-0609

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
K.W. v. STATE

CR-16-0743

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
CEO Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 CEO Bonus Plan 
 Bonus Calculation 
 The Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Websense, Inc. (the “Company”) will be eligible for a target bonus of 100% of his annual salary. This bonus is based upon the Company meeting its Billings and/or Operating Income
objectives determined by the Company’s Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee near the beginning of each fiscal year. 
 One-half of the bonus
(50%) is earned if the Company meets its annual Billings objective and one-half is earned if the Company achieves its annual Operating Income objective. Achievement of at least 90% of a goal is required for any payment of the portion of the
CEO’s bonus that is based on achievement by the Company of that goal. Should the Company achieve 90% of its Billings or Operating Income goals, bonuses for that plan goal will be paid at half of the target payment for that goal. Should the
Company achieve 110% of its Billings or Operating Income goals, bonuses for that plan goal shall be paid at 1.5 times what the CEO would have been paid on target for that goal. Bonuses are prorated for goal achievement between 90% - 110%.

 Eligibility 
 The CEO must be a current employee on the
last day of the fiscal year to be eligible to receive a bonus. Bonus amounts are based upon actual base salary paid during the period, exclusive of other payments or bonuses. 
 The Company reserves the right to change these terms from time to time as it feels necessary to accomplish its goals, including as a result of market conditions, personnel, new or different product offerings and/or
corporate restructuring.
EXHIBIT 10.8


 


SEVENTH AMENDMENT
TO EXECUTIVE CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


This Seventh Amendment to Executive Consulting
Agreement is made as of the 1st day of December, 2008, by and between NBTY, Inc.
(the “Company”) and RUDOLPH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation
(“RMA”).


 


W I T N E S S E T H
:


 


WHEREAS, the Company and RMA entered into that certain
Executive Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2002 (as amended by
the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Third Amendment, the Fourth Amendment,
the Fifth Amendment, and the Sixth Amendment, the “Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement expires on December 31,
2008 (the “Term”);


 


WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Company
(the “Committee”) met on December 18, 2008, with all members of the
Committee present to consider whether to extend the Term of Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the Committee decided to extend the Term of
the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, RMA and ARTHUR RUDOLPH desire to continue to
make their respective services as an Executive Consultant available to the
Company.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
promises hereafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the
parties agree as follows:


 


1.  Term.  Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby
amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


 


“1.           Retention.  The Company hereby retains RMA to provide the
services of ARTHUR RUDOLPH and ARTHUR RUDOLPH hereby accepts the engagement of
Executive Consultant from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
(the “Term”).”


 


2.  Continuity.  Except as otherwise expressly amended by this
Seventh  Amendment, the Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect.


 


3.  Governing
Law; Counterparts.  This Amendment
shall be construed and enforced according to the laws of the State of New York.  This Amendment may be executed in any number
of counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original for all
purposes, and all of which when taken together constitute a single counterpart
instrument.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


 


 


	
  RUDOLPH MANAGEMENT
  ASSOCIATES, INC.

  	
   

  	
  NBTY, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Arthur Rudolph

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Harvey Kamil

  
	
   

  	
  Arthur Rudolph 

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Harvey Kamil 

  
	
   

  	
  President

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Agreed and Consented:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Arthur Rudolph

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
    ARTHUR
  RUDOLPH, individually

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


2
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 4 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2021 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was ordered to lie 

over, under the rule 

RESOLUTION 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 

2 12:01 p.m. unless otherwise ordered. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12652]

# SUMMARY:

This Notice announces the postponement of a previously announced Cultural Property Advisory Committee meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee scheduled for February 4-6, 2025 is postponed.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Allison R. Davis Lehmann, Cultural Heritage Center, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs: email:                         *culprop@state.gov,*                         telephone: 202-904-0878.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee scheduled for February 4-6, 2025, at the Department of State to review a request from the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam seeking import restrictions on archaeological and ethnological materials, the proposed extension of the agreement with the Government of the Republic of Chile, the proposed extension of the agreement with the Government of the Italian Republic, and the proposed extension of the agreement with the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco has been postponed. The meeting will be re-scheduled, and a new notice will be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The original notice was published on December 30, 2024, FR Doc. 2024-31255, at 89 FR 106722.                

Allison R. Davis Lehmann,

Executive Director, Cultural Property Advisory Committee, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2025-02347 Filed 2-6-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**[Virchow Krause & Company Logo]****Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We have examined WestLake Settlement Services, LLC's compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to  WestLake (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007: 1122(d)(4)(xi) Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance payments) are  made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided that such support has been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar days prior to these dates, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements.; 1122(d)(4)(xii) Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be made on behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or omission;  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with these servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures  as we  considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a  reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, WestLake Settlement Services, LLC complied with, in all material respects, the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. /s/ Virchow Krause & Company LLP Virchow Krause & Company, LLP March 3, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 17-cv-00197 NC

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS JAMES BERON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CHECK N’ GO, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00197 NC

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. 15

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

no issue remains for the Court’s determination,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are

DISMISSED with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not reached, any party may

move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled 

dates are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 18, 2017, _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices of meetings published under

the ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (Pub.

L. 94-409) 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

Sunshine Act Meetings Federal Register

19987

Vol. 60, No. 77

Friday, April 21, 1995

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Farm Credit Administration Board;

Regular Meeting

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given,

pursuant to the Government in the

Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), that

the May 11, 1995 regular meeting of the

Farm Credit Administration Board

(Board) will not be held and that a

special meeting of the Board is

scheduled for Tuesday, May 9, 1995 at

10:00 a.m. An agenda for this meeting

will be published at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm

Credit Administration Board, (703) 883–

4025, TDD (703) 883–4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit

Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive,

McLean, Virginia 22102–5090.

Dated: April 13, 1995.

Floyd Fithian,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

[FR Doc. 95–1006 Filed 4–19–95; 9:26 am]

BILLING CODE 6705–01–P
John Tyler McKINNEY, Sr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9846.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Lonnie Gene WADE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1323

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.