alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

E-filed 2/22/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BVS INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

RHUB COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00673-HRL 

REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF 

DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP

In reviewing the docket in this case, it has come to the court’s attention that this action 

may be related to RHUB Communications, Inc. v. Karon, Case No. 16-cv-6669-BLF. Pursuant to 

Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled case is hereby referred to the Honorable Judge 

Freeman for consideration of whether the actions are related.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 2/22/2017

______________________________________

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00673-BLF Document 35 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 1
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 612 

Recognizing women-owned small businesses for National Small Business 

Week. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2022 

Ms. ERNST (for herself, Mr. RISCH, Mr. YOUNG, Ms. HIRONO, Mrs. CAPITO, 

and Mr. MARKEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

MAY 18 (legislative day, MAY 17), 2022 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing women-owned small businesses for National 

Small Business Week. 

Whereas the United States proudly recognizes small businesses as the backbone of the economy and acknowledges 

the impactful contributions of women entrepreneurs 

throughout the United States who are pushing small 

businesses to succeed; 

Whereas, because female professionals, leaders, and small 

business owners play a vital role in the economy of the 

United States, when the United States empowers women, 

it empowers the entire economy; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 612 ATS 

Whereas women entrepreneurs provide critical goods and 

services, create high-paying jobs, build stronger supply 

chains for the United States, and play an integral role 

in Federal contracting and procurement; 

Whereas women small business owners are key job creators 

and employers that are building a legacy for the next 

generation of businesswomen; 

Whereas, according to the 2019 Annual Business Survey conducted by the Census Bureau, women-owned businesses 

employed more than 10,000,000 workers and accumulated $1,800,000,000,000 in receipts; 

Whereas women-owned businesses make up more than 20 

percent of all employer firms in the United States; 

Whereas the vast majority of all women-owned businesses are 

classified as small businesses; 

Whereas National Small Business Week takes place from 

May 1 to May 7, 2022, and recognizes the critical contributions of the entrepreneurs and small business owners 

of the United States; and 

Whereas women-owned small businesses should be celebrated 

for their accomplishments and contributions during National Small Business Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) acknowledges the important role women3 owned small businesses have in the economy of the 

4 United States; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 612 ATS 

1 (2) commits to supporting women-owned small 

2 businesses by recognizing those businesses during 

3 National Small Business Week. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10631]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,648]


Seagull Mid-South, Inc. (Formerly Arkla Exploration Company) A/K/
A Seagull Energy E & P, Inc., Shreveport, LA; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance applicable to all workers of the 
subject firm.
    The certification notice was issued on March 16, 1995 and was 
published in the Federal Register on March 27, 1995 (60 FR 15791).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The investigation 
findings show Seagull Energy purchased ARKLA Exploration Company on 
December 31, 1992 and the workers became Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. 
Accordingly, many of the workers of the subject firm had wages reported 
under Seagull Energy E & P, Inc., and their unemployment insurance (UI) 
taxes were paid under Seagull Energy E & P, Inc.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,648 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Seagull Mid South, Inc., (formerly ARKLA 
Exploration Company) also known as Seagull Energy E & P, Inc., 
Shreveport, Louisiana who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after January 6, 1994 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 231 of Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 20th day of April, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-10631 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
PILEDS,,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUN » ; quiy
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA J

OAKLAND DIVISION etree }
NORTHERN Dis

United States of America, ) Case No. [1-OQopRg Yor
)
Plaintiff, ) STIPULATED ORDER EXCLUDING
. . ) TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
ve SWAN cM LTON )
)
Defendant. )

For the reason
Trial Act from

stated by the parties on the reco} a 6 [2 , 2017, the Court excludes time under the Speedy
ol2I 2017, to cal 2017 and finds that the ends of justice served by the

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(7)(A).

ava

The Court makes this finding and bases this continuance on the following factors:

Failure to grant a continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)().

The case is so unusual or so complex, due to /circle applicable reasons] the number of
defendants, the nature of the prosecution, or the existence of novel questions of fact

or law, that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or the trial
itself within the time limits established by this section. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).

Failure to grant a continuance would deny the defendant reasonable time to obtain counsel,
taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel,
given counsel's other scheduled case commitments, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

For the reasons stated on the record, it is further ordered that time is excluded under 18 U.S.C. §
3161(b) and waived with the consent of the defendant under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
5.1(c) and (d).

For the reasons stated on the record, it is further ordered that time is excluded under 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(1)(E)(F) for delay resulting from removal/transport of the defendant to another district.

IT IS SO ORDERED. <2
DATED: | ZN n017 ( LB

DONNA M. RYU
~ United States Magistrate Judge

stipuatep: WOU ras (uzctuetly Bago
Attorney for Defei t Assistant United States Attorney
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21026-21027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10465]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-26; OTS No. 2775]


The Industrial Savings and Loan Association, Bellevue, Ohio; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 24, 1995, the Assistant 
Director, Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her 
designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the 
application of the Industrial Savings and Loan Association, Bellevue, 
Ohio, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the 
application are available for inspection at the Information Services 
Division, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Central Regional Office, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 111 East [[Page 21027]] Wacker Drive, Suite 800, 
Chicago, Illinois 60601-4360.

    Dated: April 25, 1995.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10465 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

226 

CAF 10-01316 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF DEBORAH L. PALADINO, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANK P. PALADINO, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

STEVEN C. BUITRON, SYRACUSE, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

ELISABETH A. BARKER, SYRACUSE, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County

(Michael L. Hanuszczak, J.), entered April 6, 2010 in a proceeding

pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order granted

respondent’s objection to the order of the Support Magistrate dated

January 25, 2010. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court properly granted respondent father’s

objection to the order of the Support Magistrate granting the petition

seeking to modify a prior order of child support. The father objected

to the order insofar as it directed the Support Collection Unit to

recompute the father’s child support arrears by adding back in the

amount for which the father was credited between the date that the

parties’ daughter began living with petitioner mother and the date the

petition was filed. As the court properly concluded, it “was only

empowered to make its modification of the prior support order

retroactive to the date of the filing of the . . . petition” (Matter

of Aiken v Aiken, 115 AD2d 919, 920; see Family Ct Act § 449 [2]). 

Further, “Family Court is a court of limited jurisdiction that cannot

exercise powers beyond those granted to it by statute” (Matter of

Johna M.S. v Russell E.S., 10 NY3d 364, 366) or the State Constitution

(see NY Const, art VI, § 13). The court therefore had no general

equity jurisdiction and lacked authority to grant retroactive relief

to the mother based upon equitable principles (see generally Matter of

Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132, 139).

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
[Cite as In re Harter, 137 Ohio St.3d 1260, 2013-Ohio-5486.]

I N RE H ARTER . [Cite as In re Harter, 137 Ohio St.3d 1260, 2013-Ohio-5486.] (No. 2013-1907

— Submitted December 13, 2013

— Decided December 17, 2013.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} On December 9, 2013, this cour t suspended respondent, Brian Wade Harter, for an interim period pursu ant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On December 12, 2013, the Board of Commissione rs on Grievances and Discipline submitted a notice pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V( 5)(D)(1)(c) notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child-support order previously
submitted to the court. {¶ 2} On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Bria n Wade Harter, Attorney Registration No. 0055500, last known business address in Co lumbus, Ohio, be reinstated to the practice of law. {¶ 3} It is further ordered that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

________________________
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41349 Conference Calendar

ARTHUR LEE LAWS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; E.V. CHANDLER, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CV-549

- - - - - - - - - - June 14, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arthur Lee Laws, federal prisoner #49045-080, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the legality of his sentence. Laws argues that his claim was properly brought in a § 2241 petition because relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is inadequate as he cannot meet the requirements for filing a successive § 2255 motion. Although he purports to rely on Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the true nature of Laws’ claim is that the Sentencing Guidelines were incorrectly applied in his case. ThisNo. 00-41349 -2- claim is not cognizable in a § 2255 motion. See United States v. Segler , 37 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 1994). This is a nonconstitutional claim that could have been raised on direct appeal. Id . The fact that Laws cannot raise the issue in a § 2255 motion does not make that remedy inadequate. The district court did not err in determining that Laws had failed to show that relief under § 2255 was inadequate and did not err in dismissing his § 2241 petition. Accordingly, its judgment is AFFIRMED.
EX-10.113







Exhibit 10.113




COMPUWARE CORPORATION

2007 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

AMENDMENT NO. 1




     The Compuware Corporation 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) is hereby amended,
effective as of November 6, 2008, as follows:



     The last sentence of Section 4.7 is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:




Notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan to the contrary,
any Restricted Stock Unit, whether settled in Common Stock or cash,
shall be paid no later than two and a half (2 1/2) months after the
later of the end of the fiscal or calendar year in which the
Restricted Stock Unit Vests unless otherwise specified in the
related Agreement in accordance with Code Section 409A.



     Except as specifically modified herein, the remaining provisions of the Plan remain in full
force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COMPUWARE CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Daniel S. Follis
 	 
	 	 	Daniel S. Follis 	 
	 	 	General Counsel & Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit 3

                                 CERTIFICATE OF
                                AMENDMENT OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       UNIVERSAL AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORP.
                UNDER SECTION 805 OF THE BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW

         Pursuant to the provisions of Section 805 of the Business Corporation
Law, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

                  FIRST: The name of the corporation is Universal American
Financial Corp. (the "Corporation"). The name under which the Corporation was
formed is Universal Holding Corp.

                  SECOND: The date the Certificate of Incorporation was filed by
the Department of State was August 31, 1981.

                  THIRD: The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, as
heretofore amended, effected by this Certificate of Amendment is as follows:

         To amend Article FOURTH to increase the aggregate number of authorized
         shares of capital stock of the Corporation from 82,000,000 shares to
         102,000,000 shares, consisting of an increase of 20,000,000 shares of
         common stock, $.01 par value per share, to 100,000,000 shares. The
         number of unissued shares of common stock shall be increased from
         25,463,342 to 45,463,342 shares, all of which shall otherwise be
         unchanged.

                  FOURTH: To accomplish the foregoing, paragraph (a) of Article
FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended
and restated to read as follows:

                  "(a) The total number of shares which the corporation is to be
                  authorized to issue is 102,000,000; consisting of 100,000,000
                  shares of Common Stock of the par value of $.01 each, and
                  2,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock of the par value of $1.00
                  each."

                  FIFTH: The foregoing amendment was approved by the Board of
Directors at a meeting held on April 1, 2004 and by the holders of a majority of
all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon at a meeting of shareholders on
May 26, 2004, and thereby duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 803 of the Business Corporation Law of the State of New York.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation to be executed by a duly
authorized officer as of the 7th day of June, 2004.

                                       UNIVERSAL AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORP.

                                       By: /s/ Robert A. Waegelein
                                           ----------------------------

                                           Name:    Robert A. Waegelein
                                           Title:   Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                       58
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C ARLOS JOHN W ILLIAM S, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. M AR YANNE B RE W ER , A/C ; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-35736 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-00615-JLR M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington Jam e s L. R oba

rt, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 17, 2015 * * B e fore : O’ SC ANNLAIN, LEAVY, a n d FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. C arlos John W illia

m s, a W a shington sta

te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e n t dism issing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging First a nd Eighth Am e ndm e nt c la im s. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e a ffirm . 

# FIL ED FEB 26 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).B e c a

use the distric t c ourt dismisse d W illia m s’ a c tion on the

m e rits a nd not for fa ilure to pa

y the filing fe e , we re

je c t W i llia

m s’ c onte ntion re ga

rding the filing fe e , whic h is the only

issue he ra ise s in his Opening B rie f. W illia m s’ m otion for prospe c tive re lie f se e king im m e diate tra

nsfe r, m isc e lla ne ous injunc t ive re lie f, and a ppointm e nt of a

gua rdia n a d lite m , file d on Ja nua ry 9, 2015, a

nd re late d m otion for a prom pt ruling, file d on Fe brua

ry 2, 2015, are d e nie d

be c a use we do not c onside r a lle gations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 3 5 7 3 6 2
##### 



Exhibit 10.19
  st
 
 Initial Public Offering
   Citigroup IPO Units Company Warrant Representative Prospectus Underwriters Section
1
 Business Combination Founders Common
Stock Founders
Shares IPO Shares Founders Warrants Founders Units Sponsors Warrants Co-Investment Units Co-Investment Shares Co-Investment Warrants




---



##### 



Locked-Up
Securities Associated With Portfolio Company
  Consummation Date Termination Date Trust Account




---



##### 



Section 5 Related Party SPAC
 Berggruen Holdings Companys Right of First Review




---



##### 



Marlin Sponsors
 provided, however,
  Exchange Act provided, however,




---



##### 



provided, however, Restricted Period th




---



##### 



[Signature Page to Follow]




---



##### 



BERGGRUEN ACQUISITION HOLDINGS LTDBy:
    /s/ Jared BluesteinName:
    Jared BluesteinTitle:
    Secretary
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 761 

Designating the week of September 18 through September 24, 2022, as 

‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2022 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH (for herself, Mr. WARNOCK, and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of September 18 through September 

24, 2022, as ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

Whereas the last Sunday in September— 

(1) is designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s Day’’ 

under section 111 of title 36, United States Code; and 

(2) was first designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s 

Day’’ under the Joint Resolution entitled ‘‘Joint Resolution designating the last Sunday in September as ‘Gold 

Star Mother’s Day’, and for other purposes’’, approved 

June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895); 

Whereas there is no date dedicated to families affected by the 

loss of a loved one who died in service to the United 

States; 

Whereas a gold star symbolizes a family member who died in 

the line of duty while serving in the Armed Forces; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 761 ATS 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces, 

through their service, bear the burden of protecting the 

freedom of the people of the United States; 

Whereas the selfless example of the service of the members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces, as well as the sacrifices made by the families of those individuals, inspires 

all individuals in the United States to sacrifice and work 

diligently for the good of the United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

of the Armed Forces and the families of veterans of the 

Armed Forces should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of September 18 

3 through September 24, 2022, as ‘‘Gold Star Fami4 lies Remembrance Week’’; 

5 (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made 

6 by— 

7 (A) the families of members of the Armed 

8 Forces who made the ultimate sacrifice in order 

9 to defend freedom and protect the United 

10 States; and 

11 (B) the families of veterans of the Armed 

12 Forces; and 

13 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

14 to observe Gold Star Families Remembrance Week 

15 by— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 761 ATS 

1 (A) performing acts of service and good 

2 will in their communities; and 

3 (B) celebrating families in which loved 

4 ones made the ultimate sacrifice so that others 

5 could continue to enjoy life, liberty, and the 

6 pursuit of happiness. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS