alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Tian Ling, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xinyinhai Technology, Ltd.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: August 10, 2007 /s/ Tian Ling Tian Ling, Chief Executive Officer
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

 

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 03/23/17

APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Reset Form

Sergio Marquez 4:17-cv-00555

Bank of America, National Association

Andrew James Fulwider

Andrew James Fulwider

Andrew James Fulwider

Virginia

Bank of America, National Association

Michael D. Mandel

800 East Canal Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

1800 Century Park East

Los Angeles, CA 90067

(804) 775-7496 (310) 315-8200

afulwider@mcguirewoods.com mmandel@mcguirewoods.com

83905

3/28/2017

Case 4:17-cv-00555-CW Document 12 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:17-cv-00555-CW Document 12 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 2
Filed: February 17, 1998 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1223

STEPHEN A. ARMSTRONG, Appellant, and

INTER-WORLD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS, INCORPORATED; RICHARD L. BAST, Plaintiffs,
versus
JEANNE GOLDBERG; J. FREDERICK SINCLAIR; THOMAS J. CURCIO; ANTONIA LEIGH PETTIT; JACOBOVITZ, ENGLISH & SMITH, P.C.; BARBARA OZELLA REVES; WILLIAM G. BILLINGHAM; PATRICIA GRIEST; JOHN F. DAVIS; MARY AUDREY LARKIN; LOIS AMES; ANTHONY JOSEPH PETTIT, Defendants - Appellees, and
VICTOR MICHAEL GLASBERG; COHEN, DUNN & SINCLAIR, P.C.; CARTER & KRAMER, P.C.; CHARLES WARREN KRAMER; DAVID SMITH; CLAUDE DAVID CONVISSER; NANCY GERTNER; JODY L. NEWMAN; DELMAR D. HARTLEY; MADDONA LEA SCHAMP PETTIT, removed to Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; ANNE CONNELL; WILLIAM C. HILLMAN; ROGER A. COX, Defendants.ORDER
On November 18, 1997, we filed our opinion in this case in which we recited that relief was sought from an order entered December 6, 1995, among other orders. Further reference to the record shows that our said opinion should have referred to an order entered December 5, 1995 rather than December 6, 1995. To that order entered December 5, 1995, Armstrong, on December 19, 1995, filed his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment of the said order of the district court entered December 5, 1995. The district court never acted on the said motion of Armstrong filed December 19, 1995, although the same was timely filed. Through error, we dismissed the appeal in this case from the said order of December 5, 1995, although the said motion of Armstrong filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) had never been acted on. Armstrong has filed his petition for rehearing to our said decision of November 18, 1997, and so far as our opinion denies relief by way of appeal from the said order of December 5, 1995, the petition for rehearing is well taken. It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that so far as our said decision of November 18, 1997 denies relief from the said order of the district court entered December 5, 1995, our decision shall be, and it hereby is, vacated.It is further ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the case shall be, and it hereby is, remanded to the district court to take further action in the case consistent with this order. With the concurrences of Judge Luttig and Judge Butzner.

/s/ H. E. Widener, Jr. For the Court
Victor Jerome BLANEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2457

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Z.M., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2297

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jon Robert MUSSER, DOC #S15997, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        I, Scott G. McNealy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended December 29, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.




                                             By:    /s/ Scott G. McNealy
                                                 -------------------------------

                                             Name:  Scott G. McNealy
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Financial Officer,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly
      Henderson ,
      as
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(3)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(4)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.










Date:
      September 25,
      2006




/s/
      Molly Henderson


Molly
      Henderson


Chief
      Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance





This
      Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Adam SOUSA, DOC #Y12766, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3099

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 

** Regardless of their caption, because Doublin is in

custody, his pleadings sound under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and not as an

application for writ of error coram nobis. See Correa-Negron v.

United States, 473 F.2d 684, 685 (5th Cir. 1973). 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30236

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY W. DOUBLIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-30024-5

- - - - - - - - - -

May 18, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry W. Doublin, federal prisoner No. 09044-035, requests a

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion** for failure to comply

with a court order and he requests that this court appoint an 
No. 98-30236

- 2 -

attorney to represent him on appeal. The motion for appointment

of counsel is DENIED. 

The record shows that Doublin timely complied with the

court’s order to file an affidavit in support of his argument for

an out-of-time appeal by attaching the affidavit to a pleading

filed in the district court on October 30, 1997. Thus, the

district court erred by dismissing his motion for failure to

comply with the court’s order. Sonnier v. Johnson, 161 F.3d 941,

943 (5th Cir. 1998). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider

the merits of Doublin’s substantive habeas claims because the

district court did not consider whether a COA should be granted

on those issues. See Whitehead v. Johnson, 157 F.3d 384, 387-88

(5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, we GRANT a COA and VACATE AND

REMAND to the district court for consideration of Doublin’s

affidavit. 

COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21130-21131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10551]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Army Science Board; Notice of Open Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 22 & 23 May 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 0900-1650, 22 & 23 May 1995.
    Place: Alexandria, VA.
    Agenda: The Army Science Board (ASB) Independent Assessment 
Panel on ``Lead-Based Paint Management'' will be briefed on 
applicable Federal, DoD, and Army policies and regulations 
concerning the management of lead-based paint and lead-based paint 
[[Page 21131]] hazards at Army installations. These meetings will be 
open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, 
or file statements with the committee at the time and in the manner 
permitted by the committee. The ASB Administrative Officer, Sally 
Warner, may be contacted for further information at (703) 695-0781.
Sally A. Warner,
Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 95-10551 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7397

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY ALFORENZO WALKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:93-cr-00084-AWA-1; 2:98-cv-01415-JCC)

Submitted: December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Alforenzo Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Alforenzo Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny 

Walker’s motion for reconsideration. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Daniel Jamar BROWN, DOC #R53553, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1554

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jeffrey Claude STEPHENS, petitioner, v. Jerome W. WALSH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

No. 12-9605.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10398]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Astronomical Sciences; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Astronomical Sciences.
    Date and Time: May 16, 1995, 9:30 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 1020, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Kurt W. Weiler, Adjunct Program Director, 
Division of Astronomical Sciences, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703/306-0035 x 
7185.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations on 
proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation for financial 
support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Academic Research Infrastructure 
(ARI) Program Proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-10398 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-116017-24]
          - RIN 1545-BR36

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of a notice of public hearing on a proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

This document contains proposed regulations that would provide certain administrative requirements for unincorporated organizations taking advantage of modifications to the rules governing elections to be excluded from the application of partnership tax rules.

# DATES:

The public hearing scheduled for February 7, 2025, at 10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martina Greene of the Publications and Regulations Section, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) at (202) 317-6901 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 20, 2024 (89 FR 91617) announced that a public hearing being held in person and by teleconference was scheduled for February 7, 2025, at 10 a.m. EST. The subject of the public hearing is under 26 CFR part 1.                

The public comment period for these regulations expired on January 21, 2025. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to testify and an outline of the topics to be addressed. We did not receive a request to testify at the Public Hearing. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for February 7, 2025, at 10 a.m. EST is cancelled.

Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,

Section Chief, Publications and Regulations Section, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure & Administration).

[FR Doc. 2025-02251 Filed 2-4-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P