20488 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices

API intends to engage in electric

power and energy transactions as a

marketer and a broker. In transactions

where API sells electric energy it

proposes to make such sales on rates,

terms, and conditions to be mutually

agreed to with the purchasing party. API

is not in the business of generating,

transmitting, or distributing electric

power.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Public Service Company of

Oklahoma Southwestern Electric Power

Company

[Docket No. ER95–880–000]

Take notice that on April 3, 1995,

Public Service Company of Oklahoma

and Southwestern Electric Power

Company (collectively the Companies),

tendered for filing an executed

coordination transmission service

agreement between Companies and the

NorAm Energy Services, Inc. (NorAm)

and a revised index of purchasers to

whom Companies provide service under

their Coordination Transmission Service

Tariff. The Companies request that the

filing be accepted to become effective as

of March 1, 1995.

A copy of the filing has been sent to

NorAm, the Louisiana Public Service

Commission, the Arkansas Public

Service Commission and the Oklahoma

Corporation Commission.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Atlantic City Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–881–000]

Take notice that on April 6, 1995,

Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE),

tendered for filing an Agreement for

Short-Term Energy Transactions

between ACE and Engelhard Power

Marketing, Inc. ACE requests that the

Agreement be accepted to become

effective April 7, 1995.

Copies of the filing were served on the

New Jersey Board of Regulatory

Commissioners.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Cambridge Electric Light Co.

[Docket No. ER95–882–000]

Take notice that on April 6, 1995,

Cambridge Electric Light Company

(Cambridge), tendered for filing an

informational report detailing the

charges for non-firm transmission

service derived under the formula rate

provision of Cambridge’s FERC Electric

Tariff Original Volume No. 4, accepted

by the Commission on September 30,

1987 in FERC Docket No. ER87–600–

000.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10218 Filed 4–25–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. ER95–430–000, et al.]

Philbro Division of Salomon, Inc., et

al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

April 19, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Phibro Division of Salomon Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–430–000]

Take notice that on April 12, 1995,

Phibro Division of Salomon Inc.

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Kentucky Utilities Co.

[Docket No. ER95–595–000]

Take notice that on April 10, 1995,

Kentucky Utilities Company tendered

for filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. TransCanada Northridge Power Ltd.

[Docket No. ER95–692–000]

Take notice that on April 12, 1995,

TransCanada Northridge Power Ltd.

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. IEP Power Marketing, L.L.C.

[Docket No. ER95–802–000]

Take notice that on April 10, 1995,

IEP Power Marketing, L.L.C. tendered

for filing an amendment in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Texas-New Mexico Co.

[Docket No. ER95–829–000]

Take notice that on March 30, 1995,

Texas-New Mexico Power Company

(TNMP) tendered for filing (1) a certain

letter agreement between TNMP and

Public Service Company of New Mexico

(PNM) providing for the suspension of

Service Schedule G to a certain PNMTNMP interconnection agreement and

(2) Amendment No. 5 of a certain

Southwest New Mexico Transmission

Project Participation (SWNMT)

Agreement among TNMP, PNM, and El

Paso Electric Company (EPE). Such

interconnection agreement and SWNMT

agreement are components of TNMP’s

Rate Schedule No. 4.

TNMP requests waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements and

that the two tendered contractual

documents be permitted to become

effective, in accordance with their

provisions, as of the first day of the

month following the filing.

TNMP asserts that the filing has been

served on PNM, EPE, the Texas Public

Utility Commission, and the New

Mexico Public Utility Commission.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. West Resources, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–841–000]

Take notice that on March 31, 1995,

Western Resources, Inc., (WRI) tendered

for filing a proposed change in its Rate

Schedule FERC No. 264 and to Kansas

Gas and Electric’s (KG&E) Rate Schedule

FERC No. 183. WRI states that the

change is in accordance with its Electric

Power, Transmission and Service

Contract with Kansas Electric Power

Cooperative (KEPCo) and further that

the proposed change for KG&E is in

accordance with the Electric Power,

Transmission and Service contract

between KG&E and KEPCo. Revised

Exhibits B set forth Nominated

Capacities for transmission, distribution

and dispatch service for the contract
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices 20489

years, pursuant to Article IV, Section 4.1

of Rate Schedule FERC Nos. 264 and

183. Revised Exhibits C set forth

KEPCo’s Nominated Capacities for the

Points of Interconnection, pursuant to

Article IV, Section 4.1 of Rate Schedule

FERC Nos. 264 and 183. Revised

Exhibits D set forth KEPCo’s load

forecast and KEPCo’s Capacity

Resources intended to provide power

and energy to meet the forecast

requirement for ten years into the

future, pursuant to Article V, Section

5.1 of Rate Schedule FERC Nos. 264 and

183.

Copies of the filing were served upon

Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.

and the Kansas Corporation

Commission.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Louisville Gas and Electric Co.

[Docket No. ER95–879–000]

Take notice that on April 3, 1995,

Louisville Gas and Electric Company

tendered for filing a copy of a service

agreement between Louisville Gas and

Electric Company and Rainbow Energy

Marketing Corp. under Rate GSS.

Notice is also given that the service

agreement listed below and filed with

the Commission by Louisville Gas and

Electric Company is to be cancelled.

Date of

agreement

PurchaserCancellation date

Cancellation effective

3/28/95 Rainbow

Energy

Marketing

Corp.

3/28/95 3/28/95

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

[Docket No. FA89–28–005]

Take notice that on April 10, 1995,

Arkansas Power & Light Company

tendered for filing its refund report in

the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: May 3, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10217 Filed 4–25–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. CP95–311–000, et al.]

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company,

et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings

April 18, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co.

[Docket No. CP95–311–000]

Take notice that on April 7, 1995, East

Tennessee Natural Gas Company (East

Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston,

Texas 77252, filed in Docket No. CP95–

311–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.212 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205,

157.212) for authorization to modify an

existing meter station in Roane County,

Tennessee under East Tennessee’s

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP82–412–000 pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

East Tennessee proposes to replace an

obsolete 6-inch orifice meter tube with

a 4-inch tube at the existing Harriman

meter station, #75–9032, at M.P. 3110–

1+8.40 (S.V. 3110B–101) on the 3100–1

Line. This tube replacement will allow

the meter station to better match actual

volumes being delivered. The

installation will not be extensive and

will cause minimal disturbance since

the replacement tube dimensionally fits

the existing piping arrangement. Total

capacity at the meter station will be

approximately equivalent to current

levels due to the reduced operating

condition of the existing 6-inch tube.

The meter station will still be owned,

operated and maintained by East

Tennessee. The estimated cost is

$39,100 to be funded from the

appropriate division’s minor capital

budget. The firm service customer at the

meter station is the City of Harriman, a

municipal utility company that supplies

residential customers. The tube

replacement won’t affect any shipper’s

contract entitlement.

After modification, East Tennessee

states there won’t be an increase in the

delivery quantity under the firm

agreement between it and the City of

Harriman; delivery of volumes through

the meter station won’t impact peak day

and annual deliveries; the proposed

activity isn’t prohibited by its existing

tariff, and there is sufficient capacity for

deliveries without detriment or

disadvantage to other customers.

Comment date: June 2, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph G

at the end of this notice.

2. Florida Gas Transmission Co.

[Docket No. CP95–316–000]

Take notice that on April 11, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, Houston,

Texas 77002, filed in Docket No. CP95–

316–000 a request pursuant to Sections

157.205 and 157.216 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and

157.216) for permission and approval to

abandon a small portion of an existing

lateral line. FGT makes such request,

under its blanket certificate issued in

Docket No. CP82–553–000 pursuant to

Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as

more fully set forth in the request that

is on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

FGT is proposing to abandon

approximately 6,500 feet of its 6-inch

East Mustang Island Lateral, at an

estimated cost of $117,476. Specifically,

FGT is proposing to abandon a 6,400

foot segment of line in place, 4,500 foot

of which is owned by a development

corporation, and 1,900 foot of which is

located under a road and the adjacent

right-of-way; the remaining 100 foot

segment which crosses a small boat

channel will be removed. It is stated

that the portion of line that FGT is

proposing to abandon is located in the

areas of East Mustang Island and Laguna

Madre, Nueces County, Texas. FGT

states that the abandonment is necessary

due to the encroachment of a residential

housing development. FGT further

states that it is proposing to abandon

that segment of line rather than

relocating it, because the relocation of

that segment of line would be costly and

would disturb an environmentally

sensitive area.

FGT also states that service to its two

customers located downstream of the

proposed abandonment, Gulfside

Industries, Ltd. and Valero Industrial