Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 1995 / Proposed Rules 21473

Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by

contacting the Rules Docket at the

location provided under the caption

ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation

safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration proposes to amend part

39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421

and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); and 14 CFR

11.89.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding a new AD to read as follows:

Twin Commander Aircraft Corporation:

Docket No. 95–CE–20–AD.

Applicability: The following airplane

models and serial numbers, certificated in

any category.

Models Serial No.

680T and 680V ............ 1473 through 1720.

680W ............................ 1721 through 1850.

681 ............................... 6001 through 6072.

690 ............................... 11001 through

11079.

690A ............................. 11100 through

11344.

690B ............................. 11350 through

11566.

690C ............................ 11600 through

11735.

690D ............................ 15001 through

15042.

695 ............................... 95000 through

95084.

695A ............................. 96000 through

96100.

695B ............................. 96201 through

96208.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

modified, altered, or repaired in the area

subject to the requirements of this AD. For

airplanes that have been modified, altered, or

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must use the authority

provided in paragraph (c) of this AD to

request approval from the FAA. This

approval may address either no action, if the

current configuration eliminates the unsafe

condition, or different actions necessary to

address the unsafe condition described in

this AD. Such a request should include an

assessment of the effect of the changed

configuration on the unsafe condition

addressed by this AD. In no case does the

presence of any modification, alteration, or

repair remove any airplane from the

applicability of this AD.

Compliance: Required within the next 50

hours time-in-service after the effective date

of this AD, unless already accomplished.

To prevent structural damage to the

airplane caused by excessive turbulence,

which could result in loss of the airplane,

accomplish the following:

(a) Install the placard (to the windshield

centerpost) and incorporate the airplane

flight manual/pilot operating handbook

(AFM/POH) revisions that are included with

the kits presented below. The placard and

AFM/POH revisions provide warnings to the

airplane operator of the importance of

observing the Turbulent Air Penetration and

Maneuvering speeds:

Kit No. Model affected

SB220–1 ............................... 680T.

SB220–2 ............................... 680V.

SB220–3 ............................... 680W.

SB220–4 ............................... 681.

SB220–5 ............................... 690.

SB220–6 ............................... 690A.

SB220–7 ............................... 690B.

SB220–8 ............................... 690C.

SB220–9 ............................... 690D.

SB220–10 ............................. 695.

SB220–11 ............................. 695A.

SB220–12 ............................. 695B.

Note 2: Twin Commander Service Bulletin

No. 220, dated February 1, 1995, relates to

the subject of this AD, and references the

SB220 service kits specified above.

(b) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197

and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a

location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

(c) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an equivalent level of safety may be

approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Northwest

Mountain Region, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,

Renton, Washington 98055–4056. The

request shall be forwarded through an

appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector,

who may add comments and then send it to

the Manager, Seattle ACO.

Note 3: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Seattle ACO.

(d) All persons affected by this directive

may obtain copies of the document referred

to herein upon request to the Twin

Commander Aircraft Corporation, 19010 59th

Drive, NE., Arlington, Washington 98223; or

may examine this document at the FAA,

Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief

Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street,

Kansas City, Missouri 64106.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April

26, 1995.

Henry A. Armstrong,

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,

Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 95–10711 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95–AGL–1]

Proposed Modification of Class D

Airspace and Removal of Class E

Airspace, Rockford, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This notice proposes to

modify the Class D airspace area and

remove the Class E2 airspace area at

Greater Rockford Airport, Rockford, IL.

The Rockford Air Traffic Control Tower

(ATCT) is a continuous (24 Hour a day)

operation. The intent of this proposal is

to amend the Class D airspace area’s

effective hours to coincide with the

associated control tower’s hours of

operation, by changing the Class D

airspace from part-time to full-time. The

Class E2 airspace was previously

needed to clarify when two-way radio

communication with the ATCT was

required and to provide adequate Class

E airspace for instrument approach

procedures when the control tower is

closed. The airspace is no longer needed

since the ATCT is now a continuous

operation; therefore, the intent is to

remove the part-time Class E2 airspace.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before June 15, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the

Assistant Chief Counsel, AGL–7, Rules

Docket No. 95–AGL–1, 2300 East Devon

Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018.

The official docket may be examined

in the Office of the Assistant Chief

Counsel, Federal Aviation

Administration, 2300 East Devon

Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois. An

informal docket may also be examined

during normal business hours at the Air

Traffic Division, System Management

Branch, Federal Aviation

Administration, 2300 East Devon

Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angeline Perri, Air Traffic Division,

System Management Branch, AGL–530,

Federal Aviation Administration, 2300

East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois

60018, telephone (708) 294–7571.
21474 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 2, 1995 / Proposed Rules

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views,

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related

aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify the

airspace docket number and be

submitted in triplicate to the address

listed above. Commenters wishing the

FAA to acknowledge receipt of their

comments on this notice must submit

with those comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the

following statement is made:

‘‘Comments to Airspace Docket No. 95–

AGL–1.’’ The postcard will be date/time

stamped and returned to the

commenter. All communications

received on or before the specified

closing date for comments will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposal contained

in this notice may be changed in light

of comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination in the Rules Docket, FAA,

Great Lakes Region, Office of the

Assistant Chief Counsel, 2300 East

Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois,

both before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRMs

Any person may obtain a copy of the

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of

Public Affairs, Attention: Public Inquiry

Center, APA–230, 800 Independence

Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20591,

or by calling (202) 267–3484.

Communications must identify the

notice number of this NPRM. Persons

interested in being placed on a mailing

list for future NPRMs should also

request a copy of Advisory Circular No.

11–2A, which describes the application

procedures.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to part 71 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to

modify the Class D airspace area and

remove the Class E2 airspace area at

Greater Rockford Airport, Rockford, IL.

The Rockford ATCT is a continuous (24

hour a day) operation. The intent of this

proposal is to amend the Class D

airspace area’s effective hours to

coincide with the associated control

tower’s hours of operation, by changing

the Class D airspace from part-time to

full-time. The Class E2 airspace was

previously needed to clarify when twoway radio communication with the

ATCT was required and to provide

adequate Class airspace for instrument

approach procedures when the control

tower is closed. The airspace is no

longer needed since the ATCT is now a

continuous operation; therefore, the

intent is to remove the part-time Class

E2 airspace. Aeronautical maps and

charts would reflect the defined area

which would enable pilots to

circumnavigate the area or otherwise

comply with IFR procedures. Class D

and E airspace designations are

published in Paragraphs 5000 and 6002,

respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9B

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class D and E airspace

designations listed in this document

would be published subsequently in the

Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only involves an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current.

Therefore, this proposed regulation—(1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this proposed rule will

not have a significant economic impact

on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, the Federal

Aviation Administration proposes to

amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR part 71) as follows:

PART 71—[Amended]

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 1348(a), 1354(a),

1510; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9B, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated July 18, 1994, and effective

September 16, 1994, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 5000 General

* * * * *

AGL IL D Rockford, IL [Revised]

Rockford, Greater Rockford Airport, IL

(Lat. 42°11′46′′N, long, 89°05′38′′W)

Greater Rockford ILS Localizer

(Lat. 42°12′36′′N, long 89°05′17′′W)

GILMY LOM

(Lat. 42°06′52′′N, long. 89°05′55′′W)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to and including 3,200 feet MSL

within a 4.4-mile radius of the Greater

Rockford Airport and within 1.8 miles each

side of the Greater Rockford Runway 36 ILS

localizer course, extending south from the

4.4-mile radius to the GILMY LOM.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas

Designated as a Surface Area for an Airport

* * * * *

AGL IL E2 Rockford, IL [Removed]

* * * * *

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on April 17,

1995.

Roger Wall,

Manager, Air Traffic Division.

[FR Doc. 95–10774 Filed 5–1–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 173

[Docket No. 90F–0344]

Secondary Direct Food Additives

Permitted in Food for Human

Consumption; Polymaleic Acid and its

Sodium Salt

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Tentative final rule.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is announcing its

tentative decision to amend the food

additive regulations to increase the