alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

























































UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

 Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

 

 Defendant(s). 





















&DVH1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

 APPLICANT 

 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC 3:16-cv-07213

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC., et al.

Paul D. Popeo

Paul D. Popeo

Paul D. Popeo

District of Massachusetts

Saphena Medical, Inc. and Albert Chin

Karen I. Boyd

Choate Hall & Stewart LLP, Two International 

Place, 34th Floor, Boston, MA 02110

Turner Boyd LLP, 702 Marshall Street, 

Suite 640, Redwood City, CA 94063

(617) 248-4074 (650) 521-5930

ppopeo@choate.com boyd@turnerboyd.com

567727

01/18/17

January 18, 2017.

Case 3:16-cv-07213-WHA Document 33 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 1
Byron Gibbs JENNINGS, Sr. Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3813

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James GOOSLIN, petitioner, v. Michael SEPANAK, Warden.

No. 12-10089.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Craig A.McCollam, the Chief Financial Officer of Dionex Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
 3. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1(the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and  4. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     By: /s/ Craig A. McCollam   Name: Craig A. McCollam  Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: May 10, 2004
Mark E. PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9890.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
STATE of Florida, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Rasaun Omari BROWN, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Case No. 5D18-593

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of California

NostalgiaConventions.com, LLC,

an Ohio limited liability company dba Colossalcon,

4:17-cv-00695

Colossus Con, a business entity of unknown

formation, Marina Lukyantseva, an individual dba

Colossus Con, Davidson Haworth, an individual dba

Colossus Con, and Does 1-10, inclusive,

Colossus Con, 1505 De Rose Way #16, San Jose, CA 95126

Marina Lukyantseva, 1505 De Rose Way #16, San Jose, CA 95126

Davidson Haworth, 1505 De Rose Way #16, San Jose, CA 95126

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP

Karl S. Kronenberger

Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld

150 Post St., Suite 520

San Francisco, CA 94108

Case 5:17-cv-00695-HRL Document 2 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:17-cv-00695

0.00

Case 5:17-cv-00695-HRL Document 2 Filed 02/10/17 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2020

No. 04-20-00516-CV

Heriberto D. GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

Salvador JOHNSON, Sr.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CVH002459C3

Honorable Victor Villarreal, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief is currently due by November 19, 2020. On November 13, 2020, 

appellant filed a motion requesting a thirty day extension of time. After consideration, we 

GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant to file the brief by December 21, 2020. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
R. K. W., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0766

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Joshua Troy DOOLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2460

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 6, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION


J.P.
Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-LDP12
 Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
 Series
2007-LDP12 (the "Trust")


Annual
Compliance Statement per PSA Section 11.09


I,
Michael F. Cocanougher, on behalf of J.E. Robert Company, Inc., as special
servicer (the "Certifying Servicer"), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial
Mortgage Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with
the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification,
that:


1.
                I
      have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during the preceding
      calendar year or portion thereof and the Certifying Servicer’s performance
      under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;
and
 2.
                To
      the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Certifying Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
      in all material respects throughout such year or portion
      thereof.


Date:
March 4, 2008
    /s/ Michael F.
Cocanougher
  
  
 
 Compliance
Certification, Section 11.09
 JPMCC
2006-LDP10
 March 4,
2008
 With
copies to:
 J.P.
Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
 ATTN:
Dennis Schuh, Vice President
 270 Park
Avenue, 10th Floor
 New York,
NY 10017
 LaSalle
Bank National Association
 Attn:
Global Securities and Trust Services, J.P. Morgan 2007-LDP12
 135 South
LaSalle Street, Suite 1625
 Chicago,
IL 60603
 Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A.
 as Master
Servicer for J.P. Morgan 2007-LDP12
 45
Freemont Street, 2nd
Floor
 San
Francisco, CA 94105
 Standard
& Poor's Rating Services
 Attn:
CMBS Surveillance Group
 55 Water
Street
 New York
NY 10041-0003
 Fitch
 Attn:
Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities Group
 One State
Street Plaza
 New York,
NY 1004
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D22-1439

_____________________________

HARRIS D. WALKER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

September 9, 2022

PER CURIAM.

The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance 

of appellate counsel on the merits.

B.L. THOMAS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur; KELSEY, J., dissents 

without opinion.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Harris D. Walker, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Aurora Loan Services LLC 10350 Park Meadow Drive Littleton, CO 80124 Attention: Master Servicing, LMT 2007-7

Re: Annual Compliance Statement for LMT 2007-7
In connection with the loans serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (the "Company") pursuant to the Company's Servicing Agreement(s)/Purchase and Sale Agreement(s) with  Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement(s) (together, the "Transaction Agreements"), I, the undersigned officer, hereby certify the following as of December 31, 2007:
(i)

The Company conducted a review of its activities during the immediately preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its performance under the Transaction Agreements
during such period has been made under my supervision; and
(ii)

To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transaction Agreements in all material respects throughout such calendar year (or applicable portion thereof), except as follows:


SunTrust Mortgage did not maintain the required fidelity bond coverage amount in accordance with

229.1122(d)(i)(iv) at all times during 2007. The Company
maintained fidelity bond coverage in the amount of $150MM throughout calendar year 2007, which was determined to be insufficient according to applicable FNMA transaction agreement terms. This deficiency was an issue for limited portions of the year and resulted from an increase in the volume of the servicing portfolio. SunTrust Mortgage has requested a waiver from FNMA stating this coverage amount is adequate without regard for the size of the residential servicing portfolio, subject to an annual FNMA review. FNMA has verbally agreed to this request, and SunTrust Mortgage is working to formalize this agreement.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I do hereby certify the foregoing as of the date hereof.

/s/ John R. Purcell, Jr.

John R. Purcell, Jr. Senior Vice President  Manager, Servicing Division

Date:   March 12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S JUNE 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         432,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,283,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (281,115)
<INVENTORY>                                     35,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,324,379
<PP&E>                                      22,825,727
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,784,662)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,264,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,214,874
<BONDS>                                      5,693,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    203,580
<COMMON>                                       407,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,811,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,264,657
<SALES>                                      1,238,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,312,538
<CGS>                                        5,240,262
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,579,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (144,028)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (219,974)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,208,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,208,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,208,205)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
# L_2018210EN.01000201.xml

| 21.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/1153

of 26 June 2018

on the signing on behalf of the Union of the Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and the Government of the People's Republic of China

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 100(2), in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 7 March 2016, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the Government of People's Republic of China for an Agreement on civil aviation safety. The Commission has negotiated, on behalf of the Union, an Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and the Government of the People's Republic of China (‘the Agreement’) in order to foster bilateral cooperation on civil aviation safety and facilitate trade and investment in aeronautical products between the Union and the People's Republic of China. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 7 March 2016, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the Government of People's Republic of China for an Agreement on civil aviation safety. The Commission has negotiated, on behalf of the Union, an Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and the Government of the People's Republic of China (‘the Agreement’) in order to foster bilateral cooperation on civil aviation safety and facilitate trade and investment in aeronautical products between the Union and the People's Republic of China.

| (2) | The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion at a later date, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion at a later date,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing on behalf of the Union of the Agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and the Government of the People's Republic of China (‘the Agreement’) is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 26 June 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. ZAHARIEVA

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 29 (Thursday, February 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9558-9559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02562]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 13, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 4, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
612 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 9559]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1170, K2025-1170.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-02562 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
        ----------------------------------------------------

     I, John Markovitch, Jr., hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alpha
Motorsport, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
    material information relating to Alpha Motorsport, Inc., including
    its subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within
    those entities, particularly during the period in which this
    quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
    filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
    our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or
    operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our
    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
    and have further advised our auditors that there we are not aware
    of any material weaknesses in our internal controls; and

b)  that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved
    our management or other employees who have a significant role in
    our internal controls; and

6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation.

                                   Alpha Motorsport, Inc., Registrant

Dated: June 17, 2005              /s/ John Markovitch, Jr.
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   By: John Markovitch, Jr., Chief Financial
                                   Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
                                   Treasurer and Director
Elmer E. RICHARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.