alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv4w13






Exhibit 4.13




Consent of Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP




To:   The Directors of Fronteer Development Group Inc.




     We hereby consent to the reference to our name and opinions contained under “Legal Matters”,
“Experts” and “Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations” in the Circular accompanying the
Offer dated January 23, 2009 made by Fronteer Development Group Inc. to the holders of Common
Shares of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. and in the registration statement on Form F-8 filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Toronto, Ontario	  	(signed) Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
 	 
	January 23, 2009 	 	Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg llp
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 823 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Groseclose. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 11, 2022 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation in United States 

v. Groseclose. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Groseclose, Cr. No. 

21-311, pending in the United States District Court for 

the District of Columbia, the prosecution has requested 

the production of testimony from Daniel Schwager, a 

former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 

Senate, and from Nate Russell and Diego Torres, 

custodians of records in the Senate Recording Studio, a 

department of the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and 

Doorkeeper of the Senate; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and employees of the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 823 ATS 

Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 

for evidence relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee 

2 of the Office of the Secretary of the Senate, and Nate Rus3 sell and Diego Torres, custodians of records in the Senate 

4 Recording Studio, are authorized to provide relevant testi5 mony in the case of United States v. Groseclose, except con6 cerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted. 

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

8 represent Messrs. Schwager, Russell, and Torres, and any 

9 current or former officer or employee of their offices, in 

10 connection with the production of evidence authorized in 

11 section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Masieh POURAHMAD, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 12-9626.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10190]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Cooperative Agreement for Administrative Assistance

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts requests proposals leading 
to the award of a Cooperative Agreement to assist its Local Arts 
Agencies Program in the fiscal control and administration of payments 
to evaluators for telephone evaluations of grant applicants. Total 
payments are not expected to exceed $5,000. Responsibilities will 
entail administering approximately 30 payments to the evaluators, and 
preparing a financial report for the Local Arts Agencies Program. Those 
interested in receiving the Solicitation should reference Program 
Solicitation PS 95-05 in their written request and include two (2) 
self-addressed labels. Verbal requests for the Solicitation will not be 
honored.

DATES: Program Solicitation PS 95-05 is scheduled for release 
approximately May 15, 1995 with proposals due on June 15, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to 
National Endowment for the Arts, Contracts Division, Room 217, 1100 
Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William I. Hummel, Contracts Division, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506 (202/682-5482).

William I. Hummel,
Director, Contracts and Procurement Division.
[FR Doc. 95-10190 Filed 4-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Discover Bank

Discover Card Master Trust I

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Discover Bank, pursuant to Section 3.07(c) of the Second Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2010, as
amended (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement), by and between Discover Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, hereby certifies that:



|(a) | A review of the activities of Discover Bank during the one-month transition period ended December 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2013 and of its
performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Discover Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
throughout the one-month transition period ended December 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2013.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 21st day of March 2014.



By:

/s/ Michael F. RickertMichael F. Rickert,Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andAssistant TreasurerDiscover Bank,Master Servicer and Servicer ofDiscover Card Master Trust I
Lorenza PORTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-8112.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
T.F., the Mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D19-77

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Thomas J. Butler, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, Miami, for appellee Department of Children and Families; Craig Robert Lewis ; Thomasina Moore (Tallahassee), for appellee the Guardian ad Litem Program.

Before SALTER, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*486Affirmed. *See**R.J. v. Dep't of Children & Families*, 230 So. 3d 510, 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; *A.M. v. Dep't of Children & Families*, 223 So. 3d 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).
James Anthony BULLOCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10234.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Engineer 

Description of Duties 

Identify, develop, and enhance the science related to tobacco products, their use, and the 

resulting morbidity and mortality so that regulatory decisions will have the greatest impact on 

improving public health. Analyze and determine the adequacy of data and tests submitted by a 

manufacturer regarding tobacco product design and manufacturing. Prepare written synopsis of 

reviews of reports/applications with recommendations for revision, acceptance or rejection, and 

provide specific supporting reasons for the recommendation and any technical deficiencies 

requiring action by the manufacturer. Provide oral reviews of tobacco product design. 

Qualifications 

	 (1) A degree in engineering from a curriculum accredited by the Accreditation Board for 

Engineering and Technology (ABET); or (2) include differential and integral calculus 

and courses (more advanced than first-year physics and chemistry) in five of the 

following seven areas of engineering science or physics: (a) statics, dynamics; (b) 

strength of materials (stress-strain relationships); (c) fluid mechanics, hydraulics; (d) 

thermodynamics; (e) electrical fields and circuits; (f) nature and properties of materials 

(relating particle and aggregate structure to properties); and (g) any other comparable 

area of fundamental engineering science or physics, such as optics, heat transfer, soil 

mechanics, or electronics. A combination of education (coursework equivalent to a 

major) and experience may be considered. 

	 U.S. citizenship is required. 

Education 

An official transcript, unofficial transcript, or a list including courses, grades earned, completion 

dates, and quarter and semester hours earned may be required. If you are using education 

completed in foreign colleges or universities to meet the qualification requirements, you must 

show that the education credentials have been evaluated by a private organization that specializes 

in interpretation of foreign education programs and such education has been deemed equivalent 

to that gained in an accredited U.S. education program; or full credit has been given for the 

courses at a U.S. accredited college or university. For further information, click on: foreign 

education.

Note: Please review each grade announcement for the specific qualifications and specialized 

experience. 
Grade (Salary) Levels 

Federal General Schedule (GS) grade levels at which Engineers are commonly filled are: 

 GS-07 through GS-15 ($44,941.00 to $161,900.00 / Per Year) 

Geographic Location 

Engineers are located at FDA Headquarters in Silver Spring, MD
La aplicación USDA 

FoodKeeper le indica cuanto 

tiempo pueden permanecer 

los alimentos y las bebidas en 

la nevera o el congelador de 

manera segura.

Al hacer compra, coja los 

alimentos perecederos al 

final y siga directo para su 

casa. 

Enfríe la compra, las sobras y 

la comida a domicilio dentro 

de 2 horas, o 1 hora si están 

a temperaturas mayores de 

90 °F. Use un termómetro 

de electrodomésticos para 

regular la nevera a 40 °F o 

menos y el congelador a 0 °F 

o menos.

Cuando lleve alimentos fríos, 

póngalos en un recipiente 

térmico con hielo.

Consulte la aplicación Compre sin parar Refrésquese

Déjelo respirar No se acalore

Deje espacio para que el aire 

circule entre los recipientes en 

la nevera y el congelador. 

CONSEJOS BREVES SOBRE 

SEGURIDAD ALIMENTARIA PASO 4: ENFRIAR

Para obtener más Consejos breves sobre los 

4 pasos para la seguridad alimentaria: 

limpiar, separar, cocinar y enfriar, visite 

www.fda.gov/food

julio de 2018

ENFRIAR

SEGURIDAD ALIMENTARIA CADA DÍA
Jose CRUZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10163.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Letrell Durae MCKNIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1863

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

THOMAS IGLESIAS individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

Vs.

FERRARA CANDY CO., and DOES 1

Through 10, inclusive.

Defendants.

SEP 24 2018

SUSAN YSOON^

northern Dis^ScI OF Mul

Case No. 3:17-cv-00849-VC

OBJECTION TO ATTORNEY FEES

Hon. Judge Vince Chhabria

OBJECTION OF AMY BRUNET

Amy Brunei

1306 McAndrews Road East

Bumsville, Minnesota 55337

612-220-3989

Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 87 Filed 09/24/18 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 87 Filed 09/24/18 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 87 Filed 09/24/18 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 87 Filed 09/24/18 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 87 Filed 09/24/18 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:17-cv-00849-VC Document 87 Filed 09/24/18 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,988,400
<SECURITIES>                                93,821,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,650,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,396,400
<PP&E>                                       5,096,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 197,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             272,348,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,352,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,829,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,680,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               272,348,400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,203,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,624,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               166,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,363,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,509,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                   760,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,749,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 94 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 94

Designating the week beginning February 28, 2021, as ``National Tribal 
                   Colleges and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2021

   Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Daines, Ms. Smith, Ms. Warren, Mrs. 
   Fischer, Mr. Barrasso, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Cramer, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. 
   Baldwin, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Schatz, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Inhofe, Ms. 
    Stabenow, Mr. Thune, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Kelly, Mr. 
   Johnson, Mr. Rounds, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Hoeven) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week beginning February 28, 2021, as ``National Tribal 
                   Colleges and Universities Week''.

Whereas there are 37 Tribal Colleges and Universities operating on more than 75 
        campuses in 16 States;
Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are tribally chartered or federally 
        chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique 
        relationship with the Federal Government;
Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities serve students from more than 230 
        federally recognized Indian tribes;
Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities offer students access to knowledge and 
        skills grounded in cultural traditions and values, including indigenous 
        languages, which--

    (1) enhances Indian communities; and

    (2) enriches the United States as a nation;

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities provide access to high-quality 
        postsecondary educational opportunities for--

    (1) American Indians;

    (2) Alaska Natives; and

    (3) other individuals that live in some of the most isolated and 
economically depressed areas in the United States;

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are accredited institutions of higher 
        education that prepare students to succeed in the global and highly 
        competitive workforce;
Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities have open enrollment policies, and 
        approximately 15 percent of the students at Tribal Colleges and 
        Universities are non-Indian individuals; and
Whereas the collective mission and the considerable achievements of Tribal 
        Colleges and Universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning February 28, 2021, as 
        ``National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week''; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups to observe National Tribal Colleges and Universities 
        Week with appropriate activities and programs to demonstrate 
        support for Tribal Colleges and Universities.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26425-26426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-12052]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. TM94-4-34-007 and RP95-259-001]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 11, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 10, 1995, Florida Gas Transmission Company 
(FGT) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revision Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Substitute 3rd Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A
Substitute 2nd Revised Original Sheet No. 8A.02

    On May 1, 1995, FGT filed in Docket Nos. TM94-4-34-006 and RP95-
259-000 to replace the Annual Unit Take-Or-Pay Surcharge (TOP 
Surcharge) mechanism by modifying Section 25 of the General Terms and 
Conditions of FGT's Tariff to reflect that recovery of remaining 
Southern Fixed Charge balances will be pursuant to arrangements which 
have been mutually agreed to between FGT and the customers with 
remaining balances. In the May 1 filing, FGT inadvertently failed to 
reduce the maximum usage charges to reflect the elimination of the 
volumetric TOP Surcharge.
    FGT states that in the instant filing, FGT is correcting this 
oversight by [[Page 26426]] reducing the maximum usage charges and 
eliminating the associated footnotes from the referenced tariff sheets.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a motion 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North 
Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 in accordance with 
Sec. 385.214 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such 
protests should be filed on or before May 18, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-12052 Filed 5-16-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. 34,213

5 ROBERT PUTNAM, 

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

8 Briana H. Zamora, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

10 Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General 

11 Santa Fe, NM

12 for Appellee

13 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender

14 Sergio Viscoli, Assistant Appellate Defender

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellant

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

1 BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

2 {1} Defendant appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss

3 the charge of commercial burglary. Defendant entered a conditional plea reserving for

4 appeal the issues raised in his motion to dismiss. [RP 98-99] This Court issued a

5 calendar notice proposing to reverse based on our decision in State v. Archuleta, ___-

6 NMCA-___, ___ P.3d ___ (No. 32,794, Oct. 27, 2014), cert. granted,

7 2015-NMCERT-___ (No. 35,005, Jan. 26, 2015). The State

8 has filed a response, objecting to our notice and requesting that we hold this appeal

9 in abeyance or provide the State with a reasonable opportunity to seek guidance from

10 the New Mexico Supreme Court on all pending appeals controlled by our opinion in

11 Archuleta. [MIO 1-3] We have provided the State with such an opportunity, and the

12 Supreme Court has denied the State a stay or other remedy that would suspend the

13 precedential value of Archuleta. Thus, pursuant to Rule 12-405(C) NMRA, we apply

14 Archuleta. See Rule 12-405(C) (“A petition for a writ of certiorari filed pursuant to

15 Rule 12-502 NMRA or a Supreme Court order granting the petition does not affect the

16 precedential value of an opinion of the Court of Appeals, unless otherwise ordered by

17 the Supreme Court.”).

18 {2} In its response to our notice, the State simply objects to our proposed

19 disposition without elaboration. [MIO 1, 3] We continue to believe that there are no
3

1 material factual distinctions to remove this case from the control of our opinion in

2 Archuleta. For the reasons stated in our notice, we reverse Defendant’s conviction for

3 commercial burglary.

4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 

6 _______________________________________

7 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 

10 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

11 

12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge