alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10762]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Findings of Scientific Misconduct

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity 
(ORI) has made final findings of scientific misconduct in the following 
case:
    Denise R. Conrad, University of Iowa: The Division of Research 
Investigations (DRI) of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) reviewed 
an investigation conducted by the University of Iowa into possible 
scientific misconduct on the part of Ms. Denise R. Conrad, formerly a 
Research Assistant in the Department of Preventive Medicine, College of 
Medicine. ORI found that Ms. Conrad committed scientific misconduct by 
fabricating or falsifying data on questionnaires in biomedical research 
supported by Public Health Service grant R01 ES05653, ``Residential 
Radon and Lung Cancer Case-Control Study.'' Ms. Conrad has accepted the 
ORI findings and agreed to a Voluntary Exclusion Agreement under which 
Ms. Conrad is not eligible to apply for or receive any Federal grant or 
contract funds for a three-year period beginning April 10, 1995. The 
fabricated or falsified data did not appear in any publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Director, Division of Research 
Investigations, Office of Research Integrity, 301-443-5330.
Lyle W. Bivens,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 95-10762 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-P
8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW

1RUWKHUQ 'LVWULFW RI &DOLIRUQLD

81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

1257+(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

3ODLQWLIIV

Y

'HIHQGDQWV

&DVH1R C

&216(1725'(&/,1$7,21

720$*,675$7(-8'*(

-85,6',&7,21

INSTRUCTIONS: 3OHDVHLQGLFDWHEHORZE\FKHFNLQJoneRIWKHWZRER[HVZKHWKHU\RXLI\RXDUHWKHSDUW\

RUWKHSDUW\\RXUHSUHVHQWLI\RXDUHDQDWWRUQH\LQWKHFDVHFKRRVHVWRFRQVHQWRUGHFOLQHPDJLVWUDWHMXGJH

MXULVGLFWLRQLQWKLVPDWWHU6LJQWKLVIRUPEHORZ\RXUVHOHFWLRQ

܆ Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

,QDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHSURYLVLRQVRI86&F,YROXQWDULO\consentWRKDYHD

8QLWHG6WDWHVPDJLVWUDWHMXGJHFRQGXFWDOOIXUWKHUSURFHHGLQJVLQWKLVFDVHLQFOXGLQJWULDODQG

HQWU\RIILQDOMXGJPHQW,XQGHUVWDQGWKDWDSSHDOIURPWKHMXGJPHQWVKDOOEHWDNHQGLUHFWO\WRWKH

8QLWHG6WDWHV&RXUWRI$SSHDOVIRUWKH1LQWK&LUFXLW

OR

܆ Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

,QDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHSURYLVLRQVRI86&F,declineWRKDYHD8QLWHG6WDWHV

PDJLVWUDWHMXGJHFRQGXFWDOOIXUWKHUSURFHHGLQJVLQWKLVFDVHDQG,KHUHE\UHTXHVWWKDWWKLVFDVH

EHUHDVVLJQHGWRD8QLWHG6WDWHVGLVWULFWMXGJH

'$7( BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 1$0(

&2816(/)25

2533526( ́

Signature

MITZIE PEREZ, et al. 17 Civ. 454 (JCS)

WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS 

FARGO, N.A.,

✔

Jahan C. Sagafi 02/10/2017

Plaintiffs

/s/ Jahan C. Sagafi

Case 3:17-cv-00454-MMC Document 15 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 1
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |                         |                       |
|--------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Date:      July 24, 2008 | By:                          | /s/ Neil    Bernstein |
|                     | Neil      Bernstein          |
|                     | Chief      Financial Officer |
|                     |                         |

----

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

t0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148403

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148403

COA: 312556 

Livingston CC: 12-020392-FH

ROBERT CLINTON GIAMPORCARO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 3, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statement on    Form S-8No. 333-148373,    pertaining to the Guaranty Financial Group 2007 Stock Incentive    Plan of our reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect    to the consolidated financial statements of Guaranty Financial    Group Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over    financial reporting of Guaranty Financial Group Inc. included in    the Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2007.  /s/ ERNST    & YOUNG LLP     Austin, Texas        February 29, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS CHISM,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRITO-LAY, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00152-VC 

ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Re: Dkt. No. 84

The case management conference scheduled for January 30, 2018 is vacated. The 

preliminary approval motion hearing is set for March 29, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. The preliminary 

approval motion is due by March 15, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2018

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 85 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 7

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-7 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:05-mj-70262-MAG Document 31 Filed 06/06/05 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:05-mj-70262-MAG Document 31 Filed 06/06/05 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:05-mj-70262-MAG Document 31 Filed 06/06/05 Page 3 of 3
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JEAN RENE FRANKLIN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 894

[ March 23, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Martin S. Fein , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 98

- 008627 CF10B

.

Ana M. Davide of Ana M. Davide, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf,

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

November 5, 2007 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc. 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-09867, 333-34543, 333-38163, 333-40677, 333-40675,333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332,333-101323, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586, 333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507 and 333-138593; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and 333-142795) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our report dated November 5, 2007,relating to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10665]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 690
RIN 1840-AB73

Federal Pell Grant Program; Presidential Access Scholarship 
Program

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Final regulations; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the final regulations 
published in the Federal Register on November 1, 1994 for the Federal 
Pell Grant Program (59 FR 54718). These regulations implement statutory 
changes in the Federal Pell Grant Program authorized by title IV of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended by the Higher Education 
Amendments of 1992, and the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 
1993.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Gerrans, Office of Student 
Financial Assistance Programs, Office of Postsecondary Education, U.S. 
Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3045, 
Regional Office Building 3, Washington, D.C. 20202-5447. Telephone 
(202) 708-4607. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through 
Friday.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
David A. Longanecker,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.


Sec. 690.12  [Corrected]

    1. The following correction is made in FR Doc. 94-26832, published 
on November 1, 1994 (59 FR 54718):
    On page 54732, column 1, Sec. 690.12(b)(2) ``Mailing the paper 
application form to the Secretary.'' is corrected to read ``Sending an 
approved application form to the Secretary.''

[FR Doc. 95-10665 Filed 5-1-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
#### Walter KING, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Robert M. TAPIA, John Ashcroft, United States of America, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 03-30921.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 10, 2004.

Walter King, Talladega, AL, pro se.

Thomas Burton Thompson, Assistant US Attorney, Lafayette, LA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Walter King, federal prisoner number 11086-042, appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his application for a federal writ of habeas corpus. King has also filed a motion to supplement the record.

For the first time in this court, King relies upon the Bureau of Prisons Policy Statement 1560.05 and argues that the Regional Inmate Systems Manager did not consider all of the relevant factors outlined in PS 1560.05. He also asserts for the first time in this court that the district court judgment in a criminal case should *956be construed as indicating no objection to a *nunc pro tunc*designation of the state prison as the place of federal confinement. The contentions that King now seeks to present in this court were not raised in the district court and will not be considered on appeal. *See Free v. Miles,*333 F.3d 550, 552 n. 4 (5th Cir.2003). As there is no argument properly before this court, the appeal is frivolous and is dismissed as such. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. King’s motion to supplement the record is denied.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Terry PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4000

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied August 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 12
  TEXTRON
    FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
    FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
    (Dollars in millions)
  Income before income taxes

$
158FIXED CHARGES:Interest on debt


252Estimated interest portion of rents


2Total fixed charges


254Adjusted income


412Ratio of earnings to fixed
    charges(1)


1.62
x     (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by
    dividing income before income taxes and fixed charges by fixed
    charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and one-third
    rental expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2161

RAJ BHARADWAJA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Individually and as The Mayor

of Baltimore City; CITY OF BALTIMORE;

BALTIMORE CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY; DEPARTMENT

OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; DORREYA

ELMENSHAWY, Individually and as

officer/employee of Baltimore City Department;

JOHN DOE, 1-5; JANE DOE, 1-5,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:04-cv-03826-RDB)

Submitted: May 2, 2007 Decided: June 1, 2007

 

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael P. Coyle, THE LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL P. COYLE, Columbia,

Maryland, for Appellant. Karen Stakem Hornig, Chief Legal Counsel,

George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, William R. Phelan, Jr., Principal

Counsel, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Raj Bharadwaja brought this action against Martin

O’Malley, individually and as the Mayor of Baltimore City, the City

of Baltimore, and several other governmental and individual

defendants, alleging claims of wrongful discharge, defamation,

civil conspiracy and a claim of retaliation in violation of Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e

to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Bharadwaja v. O’Malley, No. 1:04-cv-03826-

RDB (D. Md. filed Sept. 27, 2006; entered Sept. 28, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
exv10wxty






Exhibit 10(t)




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

NORTHROP GRUMMAN DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005)




     This amendment to the January 1, 2005 restatement of the Northrop Grumman Deferred
Compensation Plan (“Plan”) addresses certain 2008 participant elections.



     This amendment is effective December 1, 2008.




	1.	 	A new Appendix D is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows:





“APPENDIX D




2008 TRANSITION RELIEF





Pursuant to transition rules under Code section 409A, during a specified period in 2008,
Participants who had previously elected in 2008 to defer amounts that would otherwise be
payable in 2009 may make a new election with respect to such amounts. Such an election must
provide for a lower deferral percentage for each compensation category than the originally
elected percentage. And if a Participant makes such an election, the Participant may also
make a new distribution election (in accordance with the Plan’s distribution rules in
Section 6.1) for such amounts.”



*      *      *




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed by a duly authorized officer on this
19 day of Dec., 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Debora L. Catsavas
 	 
	 	 	Debora L. Catsavas 	 
	 	 	Vice President, Compensation, Benefits

and International
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0001023291
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   21,436,913
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  9,056,108
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       6,247,538
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     3,379,497
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,120,056
<COMMON>                                     6,949,593
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,383,417
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               8,269,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          990,367
<PREFERRED>                                    190,055
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        15,300,307
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             615,740
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>               2,891,279
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  901,933
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              10,960,904
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               40,120,056
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   10,115,574
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           333,591
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   8,433,252
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   8,433,252
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,682,322
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              17,257
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,699,574
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       962,811
<NET-INCOME>                                   503,241
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  503,241
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       414,236
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      903,256
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,374,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.94
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 21028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10659]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, May 9, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 95-10659 Filed 4-26-95; 3:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of TheraBiogen, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 (1)    The annual report on form 10-K/A of the Company for the annual period ended February 28, 2011 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: July 1, 2011
By:
/s/ Kelly T. HickelKelly T. HickelChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

       July 16, 2014

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

            JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

                                    JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 13‐1474

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

FAUSTINO ARRELLANO,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District

of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:10‐cr‐00802‐3

Matthew F. Kennelly,

Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion of this court issued on July 2, 2014, is amended as follows:

On page 21, third line from the bottom, “protected sweep” should be “protective

sweep.”
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00076-CV 

HARVEY BRAMLETT, JR. AND JASON BLAKENEY, APPELLANTS 

 

V. 

 

TDCJ, ET AL, APPELLEES 

 

On Appeal from the 108th District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 99,017-00-E, Honorable Ron Enns, Presiding 

 

March 13, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellants, Harvey Bramlett, Jr. and Jason Blakeney filed an appeal in the above 

referenced cause. They also filed an affidavit of indigence. However, they failed to file 

the necessary documents required by Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies 

Code. By letter dated February 27, 2015, this court directed appellants to comply with 

Chapter 14 by filing 1) an affidavit describing their previous filings and 2) certified copies 

of their inmate trust accounts. They were also told that the appeal would be dismissed 

if they did not comply. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); see TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. 
2

§ 14.002 (West Supp. 2014) (stating that Chapter 14 applies to appeals brought by an 

inmate in an appellate court); Douglas v. Moffett, 418 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.). In their response, Bramlett and Blakeney stated: “As the 

record in this case will reflect- the Appellants have already filed their Affidavit of 

Previous Filings as well as Certified Copies of their Inmate Trust Fund with the trial 

court in accordance with Chp. 14 Civ. Prac. Rem. Code. What’s more the Clerk of the 

Court of Appeals herself is already in possession of a copy of these pleadings per the 

trial court Clerk’s record filed July 12th, 2011 in Case No. 07-11-0139-CV. . .in the event 

that the Clerk wishes to rereview [sic] them. . . .” That affidavit, however, is over three 

years old and does not reflect the filings, if any, since July 2011. Nor do we have a 

certified copy of their trust accounts as of the date this appeal was perfected. 

The requirement to tender the affidavit specified by Chapter 14 of the Civil 

Practice and Remedies Code is mandatory, and the lack thereof is grounds for 

dismissal of the lawsuit. Douglas v. Moffett, 418 S.W.3d at 340; see also In re Anthony 

G. Hereford, Jr., No. 07-14-00348-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 11521, at *1-2 (Tex. 

App.—Amarillo October 17, 2014, orig. proceeding) (holding that the failure to comply 

with Chapter 14 subjected the mandamus proceeding to dismissal). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

Brian Quinn 

Chief Justice
Brandon M. BOSTICK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Wilbert Tony SHEPPARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2841

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.