alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Alpha
Motorsport, Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Markovitch, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.



Date: February 13, 2006        /s/ John Markovitch, Jr.
                              -----------------------------------------
                              By: John Markovitch, Jr., Chief Financial
                              Officer and Principal Accounting Officer












<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0476 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NELDIA MARIE PUCCINELLI,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 17 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 9 2023

01/09/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0476
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Pond Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael C. Litt, as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael C. LittMichael C. LittChief Financial Officer and Secretary


Date: March 28, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Randolph

Cregger & 25

Chalfant

26

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER

RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

THOMAS A. CREGGER, State Bar No. 124402

STEPHANIE L. QUINN, State Bar No. 216655

1030 G Street

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-4443

Facsimile: (916) 443-2124

Attorneys for Defendant/Counter-Defendant

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID CHAD GLOW,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,

HOWARD REDMOND, an individual, and Does 1

through 20, inclusive,

Defendants.

/

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM

/

No. C 05 01933 MMC

STIPULATION MODIFYING

PRETRIAL PREPARATION

ORDER; ORDER THEREON

COME NOW Defendant/Counter-Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

and Defendant/Counter-Claimant HOWARD REDMOND who hereby enter into the following

stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

1. The cross-action between HOWARD REDMOND and UNION PACIFIC

RAILROAD COMPANY will be tried separately from the underlying action filed by Plaintiff

DAVID CHAD GLOW. 

2. Trial of the cross-action will take place immediately following final disposition of

Case 3:05-cv-01933-MMC Document 88 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Randolph

Cregger & 25

Chalfant

26

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER

the underlying action, which is scheduled to commence trial on August 27, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. 

3. The parties further agree that counter-part facsimile renditions of signatures are 

sufficient for entry of this stipulation into the court files.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: July 9, 2007 LAW OFFICES OF JEAN SCHAEFER

By /s/ JEAN SCHAEFER

JEAN SCHAEFER

Attorney for Defendant/Counter-Claimant

DATED: July 19, 2007 RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

By /s/ THOMAS A. CREGGER

THOMAS A. CREGGER

Attorneys for Defendant/CounterDefendant

ORDER

After considering the Stipulation by and between the parties, through their counsel of

record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The cross-action between HOWARD REDMOND and UNION PACIFIC

RAILROAD COMPANY will be tried separately from Plaintiff DAVID CHAD GLOW’s

complaint for violation of the FELA. 

2. Trial of the cross-action will take place immediately following final disposition of

the underlying action, which is scheduled to commence trial on August 27, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. 

DATED: __________________ _________________________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY

U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court defers ruling on the timing and manner of the trial on the cross-action

pending discussion of those issues at the pretrial conference.

July 23, 2007

Case 3:05-cv-01933-MMC Document 88 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Antonio ANDRADE, also known as Marco Guerraro-Perez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-40984.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 6, 2004.

James Lee Turner, Julia Bowen Stern, Assistant US Attorneys, US Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Reynaldo Santos Cantu, Jr., Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*242Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Luis Antonio Andrade pleaded guilty to illegal re-entry subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). He presents two issues.

Andrade contends the district court committed reversible error by assessing 11 criminal history points for crimes committed when, according to Andrade, he was only 17 years of age, instead of over 18 as found by the district court. *See*U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(d). In examining the sentence imposed, our court reviews the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines *de novo;*its factual findings, only for clear error. *E.g., United States v. Howard,*991 F.2d 195, 199 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*510 U.S. 949, 114 S.Ct. 395, 126 L.Ed.2d 343 (1993).

The district court’s reliance on Andrade’s date of birth as stated in the presentence investigation report (PSR) is plausible in the light of the record as a whole, *United States v. Huerta,*182 F.3d 361, 364 (5th Cir.1999); and Andrade has failed to show that the date of birth stated in the PSR was materially untrue. *United States v. Vela,*927 F.2d 197, 201 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*502 U.S. 875, 112 S.Ct. 214, 116 L.Ed.2d 172 (1991). Therefore, the district court did not clearly err in relying on Andrade’s date of birth as stated in the PSR.

Andrade further challenges his conviction on the ground that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Andrade acknowledges that this issue is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); he presents it to preserve it for further review.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case 5:17-cr-00063-EJD Document 13 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal American Financial Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard A. Barasch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Richard A. Barasch

Richard A. Barasch
Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2003
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Page 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035 

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

332 North Second Street 

San Jose, California 95112 

Telephone (408) 298-2000 

Facsimile (408) 298-6046 

Email: service@mission.legal 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Francisca Moralez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FRANCISCA MORALEZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS dba FOOD 

MAXX #482, et al., 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 3:17-CV-00140-RS 

STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF 

LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Francisca Moralez 

(“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Save Mart Supermarkets dba Food Maxx #482 and RMP 

Properties, LLC (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), the parties who have 

appeared in this action, through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiff may file a 

First Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” This amendment 

will not modify any date or deadline fixed by the Court’s Orders. 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff will file her First Amended Complaint 

within five (5) calendar days of the Court’s Order permitting such filing, and that Defendants’

response thereto shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after the First Amended Complaint is 

/// 
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

Page 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

filed. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: May 22, 2017 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 

 /s/ Zachary M. Best 

 Zachary M. Best 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

 Francisca Moralez 

Dated: May 22, 2017 LANG RICHERT & PATCH 

 

 /s/ Charles Trudung Taylor 

 Charles Trudung Taylor 

 Attorney for Defendants, 

 Save Mart Supermarkets dba Food Maxx #482 and 

 RMP Properties, LLC 

ORDER 

 The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff file her First Amended Complaint, a copy 

of which was filed with the Parties’ stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of the date this 

Order is filed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the response thereto by Defendants Save Mart 

Supermarkets dba Food Maxx #482 and RMP Properties, LLC shall be filed within fourteen 

(14) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 United States District Judge 

5/23/17
EXHIBIT 15 (a)







Texas Utilities Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of Texas Utilities Company and
subsidiaries (the "Company") for the periods ended March 31, 1998 and 1997, as
indicated in our report dated May 11, 1998; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We  are  aware that our report referred to above, which is included in the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form  10-Q  for  the quarter ended March 31,
1998, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-55931,
333-27989, and 333-32831 on Form S-3; Registration Statements No. 333-45999,
333-47135 and  333-49395  on  Form  S-4;  and  Registration  Statements  No.
333-32833,  333-32835,  333-32837, 333-32839, 333-32841, 333-32843, and
333-45657 on Form S-8 of Texas Utilities Company.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 11, 1998
No. 95-3152

 

United States of America, *

 *

 Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Northern District of Iowa.

Joe Harry Gluba, Jr., *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

 

Submitted: February 13, 1996

 Filed: March 1, 1996

 

Before MAGILL, HEANEY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

 

PER CURIAM.

Joe Harry Gluba, Jr. appeals after a jury found him guilty of all

counts of a seven-count indictment charging, among other offenses,

possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, possession of

marijuana, and using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug

trafficking crime. Gluba originally challenged his conviction on three

grounds: (1) the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress

evidence seized during a traffic stop; (2) the district court improperly

denied his motion for judgment of acquittal on possession of

methamphetamine with intent to distribute; and (3) the district court erred

by allowing the state to introduce evidence of his prior arrests and

convictions and by improperly commenting on that evidence. After careful

review of the briefs and the record on appeal, we hold that each of these

claims lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm the
2

district court with respect to each of the three claims in Gluba's original

submission to this court.

Prior to argument, Gluba submitted a supplemental brief claiming

that, in light of Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), there was

insufficient evidence to convict him for using or carrying of a firearm

during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime under 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(c). In Bailey, decided after Gluba's conviction and prior to

arguments on this appeal, the Supreme Court substantially clarified the

meaning of the term "use" as employed by 924(c). By order dated December

22, 1995, we allowed Gluba to submit a supplemental brief on the issue of

the impact of Bailey on his conviction under 924(c). The district court,

however, did not have the opportunity to consider the merits of Gluba's

claim under Bailey. For that reason, we now remand the case to the

district court for full consideration of that issue.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     67,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,417
<PP&E>                                          38,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 495,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,148
<BONDS>                                        106,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,600
<COMMON>                                           800
<OTHER-SE>                                     232,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   495,476
<SALES>                                         93,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,516
<CGS>                                           65,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,451)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,287)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,164)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,164)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRIMINAL MINUTES

Date: January 9, 2020 Time: 2:27-2:40 & 2:44-3:41

(1 hour 10 minutes)

Judge: EDWARD J. DAVILA

Case No.5:17-cr-00068-EJD-9 Case Name: UNITED STATES v. Emilio Escobar-Albarnga

Attorney for Plaintiff: Stephen Meyer

Attorney for Defendant: Bruce Funk

Deputy Clerk: Patty Cromwell Court Reporter: Irene Rodriguez

Interpreter: Thelma Oros-Fotedar Probation Officer: Karen Mar

PROCEEDINGS – JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING

Defendant is present and in-custody assisted by the Spanish interpreter. 

Defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to be imprisoned for a term of 

60 months. This term consists of 60 months on each of Cts. 1 and 3 of the Second Superseding Indictment 

(Dkt. 147 filed 8/16/2018) said terms to be served concurrent to one another. 

The Court imposes a 5-year term of Supervised Release as to Ct. 1 and Ct. 3, said term shall run concurrently 

to one another if the defendant is not deported. 

The Court adopts the Probation Officer’s recommendations for standard and special conditions. Special Assessment 

Fee of $200 imposed due immediately ($100 per count); Fine waived; (SEE JUDGMENT).

Defendant is remanded to the custody of the BOP.

 

All open Counts are hereby DISMISSED. 

Case 5:17-cr-00068-EJD Document 297 Filed 01/09/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael E. Lehman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                  |  |        |  |                        
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ MICHAEL E. LEHMAN  
|                  |  | Name:  |  | Michael E. Lehman      
|                  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Keeping prepared foods longer than

7 days can make your customers sick!

Protect People Everywhere.

Serve or discard

refrigerated, prepared

food within 7 days!

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection

Days at 41oF (5oC)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32302]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-295 and 50-304]


Commonwealth Edison Company, Zion Nuclear Power Station, Receipt 
of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206

    Notice is hereby given that by a letter dated November 3, 1994, and 
a signed petition, Robert K. Rutherford and other Zion Nuclear Power 
Station security guards (Petitioners) request that the U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission (NRC) take action with regard to the new response 
team member (RTM) security plan at Zion Nuclear Power Station.
    Petitioners request that the NRC reassess and withdraw its approval 
of the new RTM security plan and require greater justification from 
both the licensee and the security contractor about reduction of armed 
guards and the defense of the plant to what Petitioners characterize as 
a minimum state of operational readiness. As bases for the request, 
Petitioners assert that the new RTM security plan degrades actual plant 
security; that the proposed qualifications in the plan are causing 
employee turnover, undue stress, labor problems, and inconsistency in 
plant defense; that monetary considerations should not take priority 
over plant defense and administrative jobs should not replace front-
line security guards; that the total disarming of the Zion owner-
controlled area and the Zion-protected area is highly detrimental to 
plant defense and public safety; and that modern armaments and 
increased hostility among the general public as well as terrorist 
threats from either domestic and/or international sources have not 
abated.
    The letter and enclosed petition are being treated as a Petition 
pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission's regulations. The Petition 
has been referred to the Director of the Office of Nuclear Regulatory 
Regulation (NRR). As provided by 10 CFR 2.206, appropriate action will 
be taken on the Petition within a reasonable time.
    A copy of the Petition is available for inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, 
DC.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 22nd day of December 1994.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
William T. Russell,
Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Regulation.
[FR Doc. 94-32302 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M