alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv4w10







Exhibit 4.10




Consent of Jim Ashton





     I, Jim Ashton, hereby confirm that I have read the Offer and Circular of Fronteer Development
Group Inc. (the “Company”) furnished with the Company’s offer dated January 23, 2009 to purchase
all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Aurora Energy Resources Inc., which Offer and
Circular incorporates by reference the Company’s annual information form dated March 27, 2008 for
the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports in the AIF or other documents
incorporated by reference therein: (i) the technical report dated November 1, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report, Sandman Gold Project, Humboldt County, Nevada, USA” prepared together
with Michael M. Gustin and George Lanier, and (ii) the technical report dated May 31, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report, Sandman Gold Project, Humboldt County, Nevada, USA” prepared together
with Michael M. Gustin and George Lanier (collectively, the “Technical Reports”). I further
consent to the inclusion in the Offer and Circular and the registration statement on Form F-8 filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration Statement”) of the
Technical Reports (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of the AIF in the
Offer and Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Reports in the Offer and
Circular and the Registration Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Reports and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Reports contained in the Offer and Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Reports
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Reports.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	January 23, 2009 	  	(signed) Jim Ashton
 	 
	 	 	Jim Ashton, P.Eng.
iLJj^O^l--

cJ€d.Actm^m

jmm

2_

lMm-£$<*35$4-

^^LMol

• RECEIVED IN

m-zsmt

± AbelAcosia,Clerk

J&jC&/k£££uL.

iMMl^

mj^iu.y^M^^^^

OaM^-Jh^^M^/^da^

otaL-Mi

\Jl£/n¥jutL/ieaC-

<ZllJ!^

d^^&^s^ Cmu—

,J^u^^-^~^^

9hL_^_£^Ml^a=L,

~rw^
UjG-..M^l-Jh^

LLlAa

ukj^Oad.^^

•jMzjQjL^,

~ScP#
Exhibit 32.2
   1.
    
    Dionex Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
to which this Certification is attached (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.
 By:
    
    /s/ Craig A. McCollam

Name: Craig A. McCollamTitle: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 6, 2009
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Derek
McLeish, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
Carbon Sciences, Inc., certify that certify that:





1.       I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carbon Sciences, Inc., Inc. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007;





2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.       Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.    
  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:





(a)      designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b)      evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)      disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.       The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);





(a)     
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)    
 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





March 25,
2008





/s/ Derek
McLeish


Derek
McLeish


Chief
Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         618,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  779,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    380,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,416,368
<PP&E>                                         898,791
<DEPRECIATION>                               (333,361)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,177,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,876,825
<BONDS>                                      9,906,118
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,227,648
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,833,541)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,177,050
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,236,448
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  466,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               334,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             307,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                127,980
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             84,467
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    84,467
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
SOUTH SHORE CONDOMINIUM VENTURE, LLC, Appellant, v. The 20 CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D18-928

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Jeffrey M. Berman (Hollywood), for appellant.

Lavin Law Group, P.A., and Andrew T. Lavin, Fort Lauderdale and Daniel E.I. Lavin, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

Although labeled a final summary judgment, the order under review did not complete the judicial labor in the case below. In Appellant's cause of action to intervene in a pending lawsuit, the order under review granted summary judgment for Appellee on the basis that Appellant lacked standing because the purchase of his unit violated the declaration of condominium. Still pending before the trial court, however, *487is the Appellee's cause of action against the Appellant for a declaratory judgment that the Appellant's deed for purchase of the unit was void due, at least in part, to the same defects. Because these matters are not factually or legally independent from each other, the order under review does not qualify as a partial final judgment. We therefore dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k).

Dismissed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

POLOTANI LATU, a.k.a. P, a.k.a. Paul, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10032

D.C. No. 1:02-cr-00174-HG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Helen W. Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Polotani Latu appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

DEC 19 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Latu contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment

782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether a district court had

authority to modify a sentence under section 3582(c)(2). See United States v.

Sykes, 658 F.3d 1140, 1144 (9th Cir. 2011). Latu’s 240-month sentence reflects

the mandatory minimum for his offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 848(a). The mandatory

minimum applies in section 3582(c)(2) proceedings. See Sykes, 658 F.3d at 1147-

48. Thus, the district court correctly concluded that it had no authority to reduce

Latu’s sentence below 240 months. See id. at 1148. 

To the extent Latu contends that he would not be charged with a crime

carrying a mandatory minimum sentence under current Department of Justice

discretionary policy, his claim is not cognizable in a section 3582(c)(2) proceeding. 

See Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 826 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

2 16-10032
#### Charles BROWN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joseph M. BROOKS; United States Parole Commission, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 04-6128.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2004.

Decided May 21, 2004.

Charles Brown, Appellant pro se. Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Brown v. Brooks,*No. CA-03-346-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly
      Henderson ,
      as
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(3)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(4)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.






Date: August
      14, 2007


/s/
              Molly
              HendersonMolly
                Henderson
              Chief
                Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance




This
      Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          35,171
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    232,165
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        688,790
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 984,548
<DEPOSITS>                                     744,496
<SHORT-TERM>                                    61,903
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,439
<LONG-TERM>                                     92,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,240
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 984,548
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 38,906
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,147
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   277
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                48,330
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,368
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,107
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,223
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,815
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  15
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,209
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,764
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,764
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.09
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,312
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   351
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,663
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,507
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,159
<RECOVERIES>                                       657
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,819
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,819
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Abatement Order Filed October 1, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00329-CR

____________

GREGORY LOUIS BRANHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 70224

ABATEMENT ORDER

The trial court failed to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the 

voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code 

of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and 

conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, 

even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. art. 38.22 ' 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). 
The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate 

the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1987). 

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of 

fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this 

Court on or before November 2, 2015.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAGREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SPARTACUS 20TH L.P., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00795-JST 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME AND CONTINUING 

HEARING

Re: ECF No. 96

On August 25, 2017, the parties filed a stipulated request to extend the time for Plaintiff to 

file a Reply on the First Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Patent Infringement Claims and Related 

Counterclaims. ECF No. 96. The request to extend the time in which to file a reply up to and 

including September 1, 2017 is granted. Accordingly, the hearing on the motion is also continued

from September 12, 2017 to October 5, 2017. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 28, 2017

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 28, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1323 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1160, K2025-1160.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-02266 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case 4:17-cr-00080-YGR Document 21 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3627-3628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1090]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Partnership Council Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DoD) announces a meeting of the 
Defense Partnership Council. Notice of this meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This meeting is open to the public. 
The topics to be discussed are promotion of partnership and partnership 
training.

DATES: The meeting is to be held Wednesday February 1, 1995, in room 
1E801, Conference Room 4 the Pentagon from 10:00 a.m. until 12 noon. 
Comments should be received by January 24, 1995, in order to be 
considered at the February 1, meeting.

ADDRESSES: We invite interested persons and organizations to submit 
written comments or recommendations. Mail or deliver your comments or 
recommendations to Mr. Kenneth Oprisko at the address shown below. 
Seating is limited and available on a first-come, first-served basis. 
Individuals wishing to attend who do not possess an appropriate 
Pentagon building pass should call the below listed telephone number to 
obtain instructions for entry into the Pentagon. Handicapped 
individuals wishing to attend should also call the below listed 
telephone number to obtain appropriate accommodations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Kenneth Oprisko, Chief, Labor Relations Branch, Field Advisory 
Services Division, Defense Civilian Personnel Management Service, 2461 
[[Page 3628]] Eisenhower Ave., Hoffman Building #1, Suite 152, 
Alexandria, VA 22331-0900, (703) 325-1380.

    Dated: January 11, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-1090 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M