alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, F. Morgan Gasior, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|/s/ F. MORGAN GASIOR                                         |  | Dated: April 26, 2010
|F. Morgan Gasior                                             |  |                      
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |  |                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



36
[Letterhead of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association]
                                                           Wells Fargo Bank, NA
                                                           Document Custody
                                                           1015 - 10th Avenue SE
                                                           Minneapolis, MN 55014


           ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of
and for the period as follows:

Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria:  The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria").  Management of the Company has determined that all
other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period:  As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the
"Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

1.  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2.  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.  In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set
forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122
of Regulation AB.

3.  Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for
the Period.


                              WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                              By:    /s/Shari Gillund
                              Name:  Shari Gillund
                              Its:   Senior Vice President


                              Dated: February 29, 2008
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                                                       |                                                      |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                       |
|                             |                                                                                  |                                                 |
| Date:                October 18, 2006 | By:                                                                              | /s/              Paul              Mann    |
|                                  | Paul                Mann                                                                   |
|                                  | President,Chief                Executive Officer andChief Financial                Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         6,454,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         2,114,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    35,082,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           000
<LOANS>                                        139,824,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,725,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,071,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     167,988,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                   000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,216,000
<LONG-TERM>                                    3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          000
<PREFERRED>                                    000
<COMMON>                                       876,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,602,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 190,071,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                12,650,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,098,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               79,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               14,827,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             6,736,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,045,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          7,782,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  785,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (4,000)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                5,248,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,197,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3,197,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                000
<CHANGES>                                      000
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,122,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.70
<LOANS-NON>                                    512,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   352,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,440,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  537,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   37,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,725,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            000
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,725,000



</TABLE>
STATE of Louisiana v. Jeremiah RAY

NO. 2019-KK-1080

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 2, 2019

Denied,
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                September 19, 2007 | By:    | /s/                James Pak Chiu Leung                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   | Name:                James Pak Chiu Leung                                                                                                                                     |
|                                    |   | Title:                  Principal Executive Officer and                                             Director |
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL

DIVERSITY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00720 WHA

ORDER GRANTING

UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO DISMISS

On May 18, defendants moved to dismiss this action as moot (Dkt. No. 18). Plaintiffs

responded with a statement of nonopposition but expressed their intent to seek recovery of

expenses incurred in bringing this action (Dkt. No. 20). The motion to dismiss is GRANTED and

this action is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs may move for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Civil Local

Rules, except that such motion may be served and filed within 28 DAYS of entry of judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 15, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Discover Bank

Discover Card Execution Note Trust

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Discover Bank (the Bank), pursuant to Section 1105 of the Indenture dated as of July 26, 2007, as amended on or prior to the date hereof (the Indenture)
by and between the Discover Card Execution Note Trust (DCENT), as Issuer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee (the Trustee), hereby certifies that:



|(a) | A review of the activities of DCENT during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 and of its performance under the Indenture and under the terms of the Notes was made under my
supervision; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, DCENT has complied in all material respects with all conditions and covenants under the Indenture and under the terms of the Notes
throughout the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate this 13th day of February 2008.



By:

/s/ Michael F. RickertMichael F. Rickert, Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and TreasurerDiscover Bank, Beneficiary and Calculation
Agent of Discover Card Execution Note Trust
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00042

- CV v.

Margaret Jordan, Appellee Appeal from the 170th District Court of McLennan County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2014

- 243

- 4 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment

of the court below. Therefore, we modi fy the trial court’s judgment by deleting the award of
attorney fees

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
We further order that the appell ee, Margaret Jordan , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 2 9 , 2016 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUST ICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

l0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137985

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137985 COA: 288151 Genesee CC: 08-022004-FH GERALD LEROY WERTH, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EX-10.116







Exhibit 10.116




COMPUWARE CORPORATION

2002 DIRECTORS PHANTOM STOCK PLAN

FORFEITURE AND REPLACEMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS FORFEITURE AND REPLACEMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) dated
                    , is between COMPUWARE
CORPORATION (the “Company”) and «director» (the “Director”).



     WHEREAS, the Director is currently a participant in the 2002 Directors Phantom Stock Plan (the
“Plan”);



     WHEREAS, the Director currently has the right to receive a payment of cash due to prior awards
of Phantom Shares made to the Director under the Plan;



     WHEREAS, the Director desires to forfeit all rights to payment of cash pursuant to these
Phantom Shares and the Company desires to replace these forfeited Phantom Shares with an equivalent
value of Restricted Stock Units pursuant to the attached Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement and
the Compuware Corporation 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”);



     THEREFORE, the Director and the Company agree to the following:



     1. The Director shall forfeit all rights to the payment of Phantom Shares under the Plan and
the Director’s Phantom Share Award Agreements.



     2. As of January 1, 2009, the Company shall grant the Director a number of Restricted Stock
Units under the LTIP determined by dividing the cumulative Value (as defined in the Plan) as of
January 1, 2009 of Phantom Shares under the Plan held by the Director on such date by the average
of the high and low sale prices per share of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq on December 31,
2008 (or if the Common Stock is not traded on the Nasdaq on such date, then on the next preceding
date on which the Common Stock was so traded) and such Restricted Stock Units shall have such other
terms as set forth in the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.



     3. The Director has had an opportunity to review this Agreement with Director’s independent
tax advisor.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned agreed to the terms of this Agreement and executed as of
the date set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COMPUWARE CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Daniel S. Follis, Jr. 	 
	 	 	General Counsel & Secretary 	 
	 
	 	DIRECTOR

 	 
	 	 	By:
Amendment No. 3 to ExlService Holdings, Inc. 2006 Omnibus Plan



 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 
 EXLSERVICE HOLDINGS INC. 
 2006 OMNIBUS AWARD PLAN 
 The ExlService Holdings, Inc. 2006 Omnibus Award Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, effective January 29, 2009:

 1. Section 5(a) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
 “Subject to Section 13, the aggregate number of shares of Stock in respect of which Awards may be granted under the Plan is 7,729,238
shares;” 
 3. Continuing Effect of Plan. Except as expressly modified hereby, the provisions of the Plan are and shall remain in
full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the undersigned have acknowledged and executed this amendment to the Plan as of the date set
forth above. 
  

			
	EXLSERVICE HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Amit Shashank
	Name:	 	Amit Shashank
	Title:	 	Vice President, General Counsel and
		 	Corporate Secretary
---

Exhibit 99.20

MINE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATESMINE ENGINEERING SERVICES
 CONSENT OF EXPERT To:

   United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549Alberta Securities CommissionBritish Columbia Securities CommissionManitoba Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionAutorité des marchés financiersNew Brunswick Securities CommissionNorthwest Territories Registrar of SecuritiesNova Scotia Securities CommissionNunavut Registrar of SecuritiesPrince Edward Island Securities OfficeSaskatchewan Financial Services CommissionSecurities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorYukon Registrar of Securitie Rio Alto Mining Limited
 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re:Technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Shahuindo Heap Leach Project, Cajabamba Peru” datedNovember 9, 2012”, (the “Report” prepared for Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd.) I, Thomas L. Dyer, do hereby confirm that I am a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 and a co-author of the Report. The undersigned, for himself, pursuant to Section 8.3 of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects confirms thatthis letter is being filed as the consent to the use of extracts from, or summaries of, the Report in the Company's Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "AIF") and to being named in the AIF. The undersigned further acknowledges that the AIF will be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Form 40-F"), and consents to being named in the Form 40-F and authorizes the use of the information represented therein relating to the Report. DATED the 13thday of March 2015 By:

   /s/ “Thomas L. Dyer”Name: Thomas L. Dyer, P. EngCompany: Mine Development Associates, Inc.Title: Senior Engineer
  775-856-5700 210 South Rock Blvd.Reno, Nevada 89502FAX: 775-856-6053


---
Jean R. LOLLI a/k/a Jean Lolli, Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2997

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 12, 2019

H. Daniel McKillop of McKillop Law Firm, Sarasota, for Appellant.

Philip D. Storey, Daniel R. Blundy, and Amanda Renee Murphy of Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jean Lolli appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of SunTrust Bank. We affirm without comment in all but one respect. In its computation of the amount due under the promissory note and mortgage, the final judgment includes items for title search expenses, attorney's fees, court costs, service of summons, and property registration. SunTrust offered no evidence with respect to any of these items at trial, and it properly concedes that the evidence was insufficient to support their inclusion in the judgment. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment to that limited extent and remand with instructions to the trial court to enter an amended final judgment that excludes those items. *See**Tracey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.*, 264 So. 3d 1152, 1162-66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (reconciling this court's remand instructions in foreclosure cases and holding that absent exceptional circumstances, a party that fails to prove its case at trial does not get a second bite at the apple on remand).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.

SALARIO, J., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

ATKINSON, J., Concurs in result only.
Peter Demond KITT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2827

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ALEXANDER LITZ,

Appellant

v.

TECH GURU, LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2021-2375

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in 

No. 91214713.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Alexander Litz moves to voluntarily withdraw his appeal “without the imposition of cost or attorney fees.” Mot. 

at 1. Tech Guru, LLC responds and “does not object to [Mr.] 

Litz’s withdrawal of his appeal, but it disagrees with [Mr.] 

Litz’s request that such withdrawal occur without the imposition of costs or attorney fees” because it “continues to 

believe that [Mr.] Litz’s appeal is frivolous and that it has 

Case: 21-2375 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 09/15/2022
2 LITZ v. TECH GURU, LLC

been pursued for purposes of vexatiousness.” ECF No. 38 

at 1. 

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The court has sua sponte determined that the award of 

attorneys’ fees and costs is not appropriate. Mr. Litz’s motion is granted to the extent the appeal is dismissed with 

each party to bear its own costs.

September 15, 2022 

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 15, 2022

Case: 21-2375 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 09/15/2022
Case 3:17-cv-00635-CRB Document 237 Filed 02/28/19 Page 1 of 1