alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10345]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CO-934-95-4110-03; COC54300]


Colorado; Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

    Under the provisions of Pub. L. 97-451, a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC 54300, Moffat County, Colorado, 
was timely filed and was accompanied by all required rentals and 
royalties accruing from November 1, 1994, the date of termination.
    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has 
agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $5 per 
acre and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the 
required $500 administrative fee for the lease and has reimbursed the 
Bureau of Land Management for the cost of this Federal Register notice.
    Having met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as 
set out in section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, (30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), the Bureau of Land Management is 
proposing to reinstate the lease effective November 1, 1994, subject to 
the original terms and condition of the lease and the increased rental 
and royalty rates cited above.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to Milada 
Krasilinec of the Colorado State Office (303) 239-3767.

    Dated: March 24, 1995.
Milada Krasilinec,
Land Law Examiner, Oil and Gas Lease Management Team.
[FR Doc. 95-10345 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-9B-M
FCC ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS SUMMARY

The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) funding is appropriated to the FCC by Congress and 

signed into law by the President through the annual appropriations process. The Consolidated 

Appropriations Act, 2019 (Public Law 116-6) appropriated funding to the FCC through September 30, 

2019. The actual text of the FCC’s FY 2019 funding language is contained below under the FY 2019

Appropriations header. 

Federal Communications Commission FY 2019 Appropriations

For necessary expenses of the Federal Communications Commission, as authorized by law, 

including uniforms and allowances therefor, as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 5901–5902; not to exceed $4,000 

for official reception and representation expenses; purchase and hire of motor vehicles; special counsel 

fees; and services as authorized by 5 U.S.C. 3109, $339,000,000, to remain available until expended: 

Provided, That $339,000,000 of offsetting collections shall be assessed and collected pursuant to section 

9 of title I of the Communications Act of 1934, shall be retained and used for necessary expenses and 

shall remain available until expended: Provided further, That the sum herein appropriated shall be 

reduced as such offsetting collections are received during fiscal year 2019 so as to result in a final fiscal 

year 2019 appropriation estimated at $0: Provided further, That any offsetting collections received in 

excess of $339,000,000 in fiscal year 2019 shall not be available for obligation: Provided further, That 

remaining offsetting collections from prior years collected in excess of the amount specified for 

collection in each such year and otherwise becoming available on October 1, 2018, shall not be available 

for obligation: Provided further, That, notwithstanding 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(8)(B), proceeds from the use of 

a competitive bidding system that may be retained and made available for obligation shall not exceed 

$130,284,000 for fiscal year 2019: Provided further, That, of the amount appropriated under this 

heading, not less than $11,064,000 shall be for the salaries and expenses of the Office of Inspector 

General.

Source: Title V of Division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019 (Public Law 116-6) –

available at www.congress.gov and https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/.
Donald K. ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. BOONE HOSPITAL CENTER et al.; and Donald K. Alexander, petitioner, v. CH Allied Services, Inc., et al.

No. 12-8620.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YAHOO! INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

PITTSBURGH, PA,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00447-NC 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

The parties submitted a joint case management statement on February 8, 2023. 

ECF 53. Each party submitted a separate proposed schedule for discovery and pretrial 

proceedings. Considering this matter is the oldest open case on the Court’s docket, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT the following deadlines are set according to the more

expedited schedule:

1. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: The Court defers addressing 

alternative dispute resolution until the next case management conference.

2. AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS: The deadline to amend pleadings and add 

parties is March 15, 2023.

3. PROTECTIVE ORDER: The deadline to request a protective discovery order is 

June 30, 2023.

4. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY: 

o Initial Disclosures must be made by February 24, 2023.

Case 5:17-cv-00447-NC Document 54 Filed 02/13/23 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

o All non-expert discovery must be completed by June 23, 2023.

5. EXPERT WITNESSES:

o Disclosure of expert testimony and reports under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(a)(2) must be made by June 23, 2023.

o Parties must complete all discovery of expert witnesses under Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) by July 24, 2023.

6. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: Parties must file and serve all dispositive motions 

by August 25, 2023.

7. FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: April 12, 2023, at 10:00 

a.m. by telephone. The parties must file a joint case management statement by 

April 5, 2023, in accordance with Civil L.R. 16-10(d).

8. PRETRIAL STATEMENTS: The parties must meet and confer to discuss the 

preparation of a joint pretrial statement, which is due by September 20, 2023.

9. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: October 4, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. 

10.TRIAL DATE: A jury trial will be held on October 30, 2023, at 9:00 a.m.

The trial will take place in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, U.S. District Court, 280 S. First 

Street, San Jose, California. All hearings, conferences, and pretrial proceedings will be by 

phone or video conference via Zoom until further Court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2023 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00447-NC Document 54 Filed 02/13/23 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00942

- CR

Ray Martin RUIZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6537

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 11, 2019.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
Robert Lee PATE, petitioner, v. IOWA.

No. 12-9433.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.
Exhibit 35.4

COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

BANCTEC, INC.

DISCOVER CARD MASTER TRUST I

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of BancTec, Inc. (BancTec), pursuant to the Services Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2008 (as amended, restated, supplement or
otherwise modified as of the date hereof, the Services Agreement) by and between DB Servicing Corporation (assignee of DFS Services LLC) and BancTec, hereby certifies that:

(a) a review of the activities of BancTec, during the one month transition period ended December 31, 2012 (the Transition
Period) and for the year ended December 31, 2013 (together with the Transition Period the Reporting Period), and of its performance under the Services Agreement was made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, BancTec has fulfilled all its obligations in all material respects under the
Services Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 21st day of March, 2014.



By:

/s/ Maria L. AllenName: Maria L. AllenTitle: Executive Vice President and President, Americas
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-17-00424-CV 

________________________

M&L BUILDERS, INC., APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

KRISU HOSPITALITY, LLC, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the 223rd District Court 

Gray County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 38,934; Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool, Presiding 

 

April 30, 2019 

 

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT AND DISMISSAL 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

M&L Builders, Inc. and Mukesh Bhakta appealed from a default judgment in favor 

of Krisu Hospitality, LLC. We abated the appeal on January 2, 2018, upon receiving 

notice that Bhakta was in bankruptcy. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1, 8.2. In April 2018, Bhakta 

filed a suggestion of bankruptcy, informing this court that his bankruptcy proceeding was 

dismissed and that M&L Builders was now in bankruptcy. On May 1, 2018, pursuant to 

Bhakta’s motion, we reinstated the appeal, severed Bhakta’s appeal into cause number 
2

07-18-00156-CV, and abated M&L Builders’s appeal in accordance with Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 8.2.

In our May 1 order, we directed M&L Builders and Krisu Hospitality to promptly 

inform this court of the resolution of M&L Builders’s bankruptcy proceeding or any other 

event authorizing reinstatement of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3(a). We received 

no further communication regarding M&L Builders’s bankruptcy from the parties. In April 

2019, pursuant to an inquiry, the clerk of this court received notice from the bankruptcy 

court that M&L Builders’s bankruptcy had been resolved. Accordingly, by letter of April 

9, 2019, we directed M&L Builders to file a motion requesting reinstatement or an 

extension of the abatement by April 19, or the appeal would be dismissed. See id. at 

42.3(c). To date, M&L Builders has not filed a response to the court’s letter.

Therefore, we reinstate the appeal for the purpose of dismissal and dismiss the 

appeal because M&L Builders failed to comply with an order of this court. TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(c).

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
No. 85-1610.

#### Northern Indiana Public Service Co. *v.*Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc., et al.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ind. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10383]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Workshop on Pre-Application Guidance 
for SBIR/STTR Proposals

    Notice is hereby given of the National Institute on Aging's 
workshop on pre-application guidance for proposals submitted by small 
business concerns under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) 
and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs for proposals 
related to technologies and approaches relevant to problems and needs 
of older people. The one-day workshop, beginning at 8:00 a.m., will be 
held on Monday, June 19, 1995, in the Natcher Building Auditorium on 
the campus of the NIH in Bethesda, Maryland. The workshop is open to 
ALL interested small business concerns and individuals; there is no 
registration fee. Presentations will be made by NIH staff involved in 
review process of SBIR and STTR applications as well as those involved 
in establishing the funding priorities within the awarding components. 
Representatives from other awarding components with complementary 
interests relevant to the aging population also will be present. In 
addition, the experience of some successful grantee small business 
concerns will be shared. Opportunities will be available for questions 
and discussions with the presenters and other NIH staff. Further 
information may be obtained from: Andrew A. Monjan, Ph.D., M.P.H., 
Chief, Neurobiology of Aging Branch, Neuroscience and Neuropsychology 
of Aging Program, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
3C307, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue MSC 9205, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9205, 
Telephone: 301-496-9350, Fax: 301-496-1494, E-mail address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f2e227c76220f21262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6809055b510528060100460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 14, 1995.
Richard Hodes,
Director, NIA.
[FR Doc. 95-10383 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AURORA LOAN SERVICES *A Lehman Brothers Company*Depositor: Structured Asset Securities Corporation 745 Seventh Avenue 8th Floor New York,  NY  10019 Trustee:    U.S. Bank National Association  One Federal Street 3rd Floor  Boston, M A  02110 Securities Administrator: Subject:  Annual Officer's Certification Fiscal Year:    2007 Securitization:  LXS 2007-15 N I, E. Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Master Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2007: 1.A review of the  activities  of the Master Servicer during the period beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the "reporting period") and of its performance under  the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision. 2.To the best of my knowledge,  based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout such reporting period. Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC  By: /s/ E. Todd Whittemore Name:  E. Todd Whittemore Title: Executive Vice President
Exhibit 75

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-76 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
Order entered June 23, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00746-CV

IN RE WILLIE ATKINS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. W069-00566-X(A)

ORDER

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans and Whitehill

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Alco Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   October 10, 2008 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
Timmy Lee COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-980

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE Michael C. MCCULLOUGH

CR-16-0995

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
August 21, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

K.J. AND V.J. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF E.J., Appellants

NO. 14-10-01188-CV V.

USA WATER POLO, INC., CHRIS CULLEN, JASON PUYEAR, W.G., JR., AS NEXT 

FRIEND OF W.G., III, K.G. AND L.G. AS NEXT FRIENDS OF T.G., M.K. AND L.K. 

AS NEXT FRIENDS OF K.K., B.R.AND B.R. AS NEXT FRIENDS OF B.R., W.S. AS 

NEXT FRIEND OF P.S. AND J.S., Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, USA Water Polo, 

Inc., Chris Cullen, Jason Puyear, W.G., Jr. as Next Friend of W.G., III, K.G. and L.G. as 

Next Friends of T.G., M.K. and L.K. as Next Friends of K.K., BR. and B.R. as Next 

Friends of B.R., W.S. as Next Friend of P.S. and J.S., signed August 31, 2010, was heard 

on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the 

judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellants, K.J. and V.J. Individually and as Next Friends of E.J., to pay 

all costs in this appeal. We further order the decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the      **

**Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002**

|   | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Asher Webner                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| Asher                Zwebner                      |
| Chief                Financial/Accounting Officer |

----
EX PARTE Christopher THORNTON

CR-17-0169

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANKLIN E. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

PHILLIPS 66,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00128-HSG 

ORDER OF RECUSAL

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

I, the undersigned judge of the court, finding myself disqualified in the above-entitled 

action, hereby recuse myself from this case and request that the case be reassigned pursuant to the 

provisions of paragraph E.2 of the Assignment Plan. 

All pending dates of motions, pretrial conferences and trial are hereby vacated and will be 

reset by the newly assigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

3/16/2017

Case 3:17-cv-00128-JST Document 19 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 30292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-14023]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-316-000]


ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 2, 1995.
    Take notice that on May 31, 1995, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 18
Third Revised Sheet No. 177
Second Revised Sheet No. 180
Third Revised Sheet No. 181

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
to restate its currently effective Gas Supply Realignment (GSR) and 
Pricing Differential (PD) Reservation Surcharges, to reflect the impact 
of the annual update of the Eligible MDQ that is used to calculate 
those Surcharges, and to make a change to its existing tariff mechanism 
to incorporate a permanent change to the timing of all such subsequent 
update filings. ANR has requested that the Commission accept the 
tendered sheets to become effective June 1, 1995.
    ANR states that all of its Volume No. 1 FERC Gas Tariff customers 
and interested State Commissions have been mailed a copy of this 
filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426 in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before June 9, 1995. Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of the application are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-14023 Filed 6-7-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Jahrell Vhantice NEAL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1465

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MAHDEE ADUL AKBAR, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JENNIFER BARRETTO, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cv-00119-MEJ (PR) 

ORDER OF TRANSFER 

This case was opened when plaintiff, who is incarcerated at the California Health Care 

Facility (“CHCF”) in Stockton, California, filed a document entitled, “Petition for Habeas.” 

Plaintiff’s various complaints, however, allege civil rights claims in that he complains about the 

conditions of his confinement rather than the fact of his confinement or the length of it. 

Specifically, he complains of inadequate medical care and due process violations. 

CHCF is located within the venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of California. Venue for civil rights claims concerning the conditions of confinement at 

CHCF therefore lies in that district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Accordingly, and in the interests of 

justice, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

California. See §§ 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), 1406(a). The Clerk shall transfer this matter forthwith. 

Because it has construed this case as a civil rights action, the Court directs the Clerk to recode this case under the following nature of suit: “555 Prisoner: Prison Condition.” 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES 

United States Magistrate Judge 

January 19, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00119-MEJ Document 4 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 1