alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     58,565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,480
<PP&E>                                          40,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,651
<BONDS>                                        106,609
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,600
<COMMON>                                           785
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   421,423
<SALES>                                         85,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,456
<CGS>                                           59,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,404)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,404)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)


</TABLE>
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 681 

Recognizing the service of the Los Angeles-class attack submarine the USS 

Oklahoma City and the crews of the USS Oklahoma City, who served 

the United States with valor and bravery. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2022 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself and Mr. INHOFE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the service of the Los Angeles-class attack submarine the USS Oklahoma City and the crews of the 

USS Oklahoma City, who served the United States with 

valor and bravery. 

Whereas the USS Oklahoma City is a nuclear-powered fast 

attack submarine named after Oklahoma City, the capital 

and most populous city in Oklahoma, and is the second 

ship in the history of the Navy to bear that name; 

Whereas the motto of the USS Oklahoma City is ‘‘The Sooner, The Better’’, which is a testament to both the spirit 

of the people of Oklahoma City and the readiness of the 

140-person crew of the USS Oklahoma City; 

Whereas the USS Oklahoma City was christened and 

launched on November 2, 1985, sponsored by Linda M. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 681 ATS 

Nickles, and was commissioned for service on July 9, 

1988, with Commander Kevin John Reardon as the first 

commanding officer of the submarine; 

Whereas, since the commissioning of the USS Oklahoma 

City, the USS Oklahoma City has traveled around the 

globe multiple times and has served in the Mediterranean, the Persian Gulf, the Pacific, and, most recently, 

Apra Harbor, Guam; 

Whereas, in the aftermath of the April 19, 1995, bombing of 

the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma 

City, the crew of the USS Oklahoma City donated blood 

in support of the victims of the deadliest act of homegrown terrorism in the history of the United States, 

which resulted in the deaths of 168 individuals; 

Whereas the USS Oklahoma City was the first Navy submarine to transition from navigation using paper charts 

to an all-electronic navigation suite; 

Whereas, on Friday, May 20, 2022, the inactivation ceremony for the USS Oklahoma City was held in Puget 

Sound Naval Shipyard to honor nearly 34 years of service; and 

Whereas, throughout the career of the USS Oklahoma City, 

the USS Oklahoma City supported a range of missions, 

including anti-surface warfare, anti-submarine warfare, 

targeted strike missions, and intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance missions: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the service of 

2 the Los Angeles-class attack submarine the USS OklaVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:45 Jun 16, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR681.ATS SR681

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 681 ATS 

1 homa City and the crew of the USS Oklahoma City, who 

2 served the United States with valor and bravery. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Private ADR.” 

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

 

 Defendant(s) 

CASE No C 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following 

stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the 

following ADR process: 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

 Private ADR (specify process and provider) 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, 

unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 other requested deadline: 

 Date: 

Date: 

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: 

Date: 

 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct 

mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an 

early settlement conference with a Magistrate 

Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this 

form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR 

L.R. 3-5.

Reset Form Thierry Lebeau Life Insurance Company of North America 17-cv-00728-HSG ■

■

5/2/17 /s/Michelle Roberts Bartolic 5/2/17 /s/Anna M. Martin Print Form X

5/3/2017
#### GULF GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-5061.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 23, 2004.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Gulf Group, Inc.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
ATLANTICUS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, fka CompuCredit Holdings Corporation, petitioner, v. AKANTHOS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al.

No. 12-1137.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ZURIEL KEN 'DELLE ASH
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3808

[ November 1, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge; L.T. Case No.

17000333CFAXMX

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. Concepcion, Assistan t Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN
, JJ., and K ANNER D ANIEL J ., Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Your patients have questions 

about generics.

Will they work the same?

Why do they look different?

Why do they cost less?

Let FDA help you with the answers.

FDA follows a rigorous review process of testing and monitoring generics and 

inspecting manufacturing facilities to ensure they have the same safety, efficacy, 

and quality as brand-name medications. 

Talk to your patients about generics.

You can help them trust the medications you prescribe.

www.fda.gov/GenericDrugs
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 79 

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of the Secretary of 

the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of 

the Secretary of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives be noti2 fied of the election of the Honorable Sonceria Ann Berry 

3 as Secretary of the Senate. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION N o. 04

- 21

- 00277

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.L.V . , a C hild Appellants From the 438th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 01657 Honorable Kimberly Burley , Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 8, 2021 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On July 8, 2021 , appellant filed a notice of appeal stating her intent to appeal a final decree of termination sign ed on J une 1 0 , 202 1
. The clerk’s record was filed on July 26, 202 1 . Although the clerk’s record contains the judge’s notes, the clerk’s record does not contain an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. See In re L.H. , No. 04

- 13

- 00174

- CV, 2013 WL 3804585, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio July 17, 2013, no pet.) ( stating judge’s notes do not constitute a final , appealable order) (mem. op.). In response to this court’s inquiry, the trial court clerk confirmed the trial court has not received a final or der. “[A]n appeal may be prosecuted only from a final judgment.” N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge , 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). Because no final order of termination has been entered in the underlying case , this court ordered appellant to show cau se in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant04

- 21

- 00277

- CV

- 2

- did not file a response showing that we have jurisdiction over this appeal

. Having confirmed the record does not contain a final order of termination, we must dismi ss this appeal. 1 Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a). PER CURIAM

1 This dismissal does not prevent appellant from later pursuing a timely appeal from a final judgment in this case.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 31027

HARRY JACKSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:11

- CV

- 22

Before KING, GRAVES

, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *

This is an appeal of the district court’s denial of Harry Jackson’s motion

for recusal and grant of summary judgment to the Department of Homeland

Security in an action for wrongful termination on the basis of racial

discrimination and retaliation. This court has considered the appeal on the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 18, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-31027 Document: 00512774152 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/18/2014No. 13

- 31027

basis of the briefs , the record, and oral argument . Having done so, we affirm,

essentially for the reasons s tated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-31027 Document: 00512774152 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/18/2014
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen T. McGowan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 25, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                       |  |     |  |                                 
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------
|Date: February 3, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/  STEPHEN T. McGOWAN         
|                       |  |     |  | Name: Stephen T. McGowan        
|                       |  |     |  | Title:   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          40,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,831
<INVENTORY>                                     98,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,841
<PP&E>                                         112,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 532,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,954
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   532,872
<SALES>                                        430,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               430,143
<CGS>                                          269,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  269,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,459
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,070
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,389
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,389
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30



</TABLE>
ACCEPTED 01-14-00290-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/25/2015 1:13:19 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
ex10_1.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10.1

     

     

    
      
        	 
      	
                February
      2, 2009

              


      

    

    


    [Name of
Officer]

    [Title of
Officer]

    [Address]

    [Address]

    


    Dear
________:

    


    I
understand that you have voluntarily agreed to waive 10% of your annual base
salary for the 2009 calendar year.  I am writing on behalf of the
Compensation Committee of Equity One, Inc.’s Board of Directors to accept your
generous offer and to provide a written record of the arrangement.

    


    As you
know, your employment agreement with Equity One currently provides for an annual
base salary of $_________.  You have agreed to reduce your annual
salary to $________, effective from January 1, 2009 to December 31,
2009.  This reduction in your annual base salary is made at your
request, and you acknowledge that this reduction in your annual base salary does
not constitute a breach by Equity One of your employment
agreement.  In return, Equity One acknowledges that this reduction in
your annual base salary does not constitute a reduction of your annual base
salary under your employment agreement for purposes of the determination of your
annual base salary for years after the 2009 calendar year or for purposes of the
determination of any other amounts owed to you by Equity One under your
employment agreement which are calculated based upon your annual base
salary.  Your annual base salary will be reinstated on January 1,
2010, without any retroactive payments or adjustments for the reduction during
the 2009 calendar year.

    


    On behalf
of Equity One, let me say that we appreciate the leadership you have shown in
voluntarily reducing your annual base salary.

    


    If this
letter accurately states your agreement to reduce your annual base salary, then
please sign a copy of this letter and return it by February 6, 2009, to Arthur
Gallagher, General Counsel.

    


    
      
        
          	 
      	
                  Sincerely,

                
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  Neil
      Flanzraich,

                
	 
      	
                  Chairman,
      Compensation Committee

                


        

      

    

    


    


    Agreed
to:

    


    


    
      
        
          
            	 
      	 
      
	
                    Date:  February
      __, 2009
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 594 

Honoring the lives of fallen Missouri police officers and expressing condolences 

to their families. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2022 

Mr. HAWLEY (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 10, 2022 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the lives of fallen Missouri police officers and 

expressing condolences to their families. 

Whereas police officers, sheriffs and deputies, and other law 

enforcement officers serve and protect their communities 

with honor and sacrifice; 

Whereas all individuals in law enforcement put their lives on 

the line while serving and protecting their local communities; 

Whereas when violent crime increases, law enforcement officers and the communities they serve are directly impacted; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 594 ATS 

Whereas, in the month of March 2022, Missouri experienced 

violent attacks against police officers, especially in rural 

areas; 

Whereas, in a 20-day period, 6 police officers in Missouri 

were shot in the line of duty, 3 of whom suffered injuries 

that were fatal; and 

Whereas these fallen officers include— 

(1) Corporal Benjamin Lee Cooper of the Joplin Police Department, who passed away in the line of duty on 

March 8, 2022, after attempting to take a suspect into 

custody; 

(2) Police Officer Jake Alexander Reed of the Joplin 

Police Department, who passed away from injuries sustained in the line of duty on March 11, 2022, after attempting to take a suspect into custody; and 

(3) Patrolman Lane Anthony Burns of the Bonne 

Terre Police Department, who passed away in the line of 

duty on March 17, 2022, after responding to a disturbance: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) expresses deep condolences for the Missouri 

3 police officers who made the ultimate sacrifice in the 

4 line of duty; 

5 (2) recognizes the countless selfless and heroic 

6 actions carried out by local law enforcement officers; 

7 (3) expresses strong support for police officers 

8 and law enforcement officers in rural areas and 

9 across the United States that serve and protect their 

10 local communities; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 594 ATS 

1 (4) recognizes the need to ensure that rural law 

2 enforcement departments have the proper equip3 ment, training, and resources necessary to protect 

4 officers and the individuals in the communities they 

5 serve; 

6 (5) acknowledges the importance of honoring 

7 and remembering fallen police and local law enforce8 ment officers killed in the line of duty; and 

9 (6) expresses condolences to the loved ones of 

10 each law enforcement officer across the United 

11 States who has made the ultimate sacrifice in the 

12 line of duty and whose sacrifice will not be forgotten. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 10, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1285 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1109, K2025-1108.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00934 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P