alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10100]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

Office of Federal Procurement Policy

48 CFR Part 9904


Cost Accounting Standards Board; Cost Accounting Standards for 
Composition, Measurement, Adjustment, and Allocation of Pension Costs

AGENCY: Cost Accounting Standards Board, Office of Federal Procurement 
Policy, OMB.

ACTION: Correction to final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final rule revising 
the Cost Accounting Standards relating to accounting for pension costs 
under negotiated government contracts, which was published Thursday, 
March 30, 1995 (60 FR 16534).

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 30, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard C. Loeb, Executive Secretary, Cost Accounting Standards Board 
(telephone: 202-395-3254).
    The final rule published Thursday, March 30, 1995, at 60 FR 16534 
is corrected as follows.


Sec. 9904.412-64  [Corrected]

    1. On page 16548, in the first column, in 9904.412-64(a)(1), in the 
fourth line, after ``to'' delete bracketed information and insert 
``March 30, 1995''.


Sec. 9904.413-60  [Corrected]

    2. On page 16555, in the third column, in 9904.413-60(c)(16), in 
the second line, after ``(c)'' delete ``(17)'' and insert ``(15)''.
Richard C. Loeb,
Executive Secretary, Cost Accounting Standards Board.
[FR Doc. 95-10100 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-M
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1250

___________

Michele Cherie Chapman Moore, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Joyce Plock; State of Nebraska; *

York Penitentary for Women; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Dave Heineman, Governor of *

Nebraska; Robert Houston, *

Director of Dept. of Correctional *

Services; Ryan Mahr, Warden of *

Community Corrections Center of *

Omaha; Jamey Odell, R.N. Acting *

ADON of Attorney General’s Office *

OCC, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: May 27, 2010

Filed: June 2, 2010

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of Nebraska.

-2-

Former Nebraska inmate Michele Moore appeals the district court’s1

 preservice

dismissal without prejudice of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After careful de novo

review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we

agree with the district court that Moore’s claims were barred by the Eleventh

Amendment, see Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989) (because

Eleventh Amendment immunizes states from suit, neither state nor its officials acting

in their official capacity are “persons” under § 1983); Monroe v. Ark. State Univ., 495

F.3d 591, 594 (8th Cir. 2007) (Eleventh Amendment bars suit against state agency for

any kind of relief); Larson v. Kempker, 414 F.3d 936, 939 n.3 (8th Cir. 2005)

(Eleventh Amendment bars § 1983 lawsuit against state agency even if entity is

moving force behind deprivation of federal right (citing Kentucky v. Graham, 473

U.S. 159, 169 (1985))); Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp., 172 F.3d 531, 535 (8th

Cir. 1999) (unless pleading expressly and unambiguously states public official is sued

in individual capacity, it will be assumed that defendant is sued only in official

capacity).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Tarrell Anton BOYNTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D19-0949

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

Tarrell Anton Boynton, Lawty, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the June 15, 2018 judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2017-CF-1228-A, in the Circuit Court in and for St. Johns County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

HARRIS, GROSSHANS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Robert Whitmore



 EXHIBIT 10.27 
 Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Robert Whitmore 
 The following is a description of
the compensation arrangements for Robert Whitmore, Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Seagate Technology (the “Company”). This description is provided pursuant to Paragraph 10(iii) to Item 601(b) of Regulation
S-K, which requires a written description of a compensatory arrangement when no formal document contains the compensation information. 
 As
previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on January 12, 2009, Robert Whitmore, the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, assumed the
additional responsibilities previously performed by David Wickersham, who resigned from his position as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer effective January 12, 2009. In connection therewith, on January 29, 2009, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors increased Mr. Whitmore’s annual base salary to $650,000, retroactive to January 12, 2009, with a bonus at target of 100% of his base salary. Consistent with the temporary salary
reductions announced by the Company and disclosed in the Company’s Forms 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2009 and January 21, 2009, Mr. Whitmore’s base salary was reduced by 25%,
effective February 2, 2009. 
 In connection with his assumption of additional responsibilities as described above, on January 30,
2009, Mr. Whitmore received a grant of stock options to acquire 1,000,000 of the Company’s common shares under the 2004 Stock Compensation Plan.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11864

 

 

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS6 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

  California                                        13-3140364

(Stateor other jurisdictionof                         (I.R.S. Employer

 incorporationororganization)                        Identification No.)

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
Недостаточная тепловая обработка мясного фарша может стать

причиной тяжелого заболевания клиентов и даже смертельного случая.

Защита людей в любой ситуации.

Используйте термометр, чтобы убедиться,

что мясной фарш готовился при температуре

не менее 155°F (68°C) в течение 17 секунд.

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection
Undercooking ground beef can make your

customers very sick and even kill them.

Protect People Everywhere.

Use a thermometer to make sure ground beef 

is cooked to at least 155oF (68oC) for 17 

seconds. 

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection
# L_2018077EN.01001601.xml

| 20.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 77/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 77/16

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2018/458

of 19 March 2018

repealing Common Position 97/193/CFSP on restrictive measures aimed at persons having perpetrated violent acts during the incidents in Mostar on 10 February 1997

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 17 March 1997 the Council adopted Common Position 97/193/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 17 March 1997 the Council adopted Common Position 97/193/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Common Position 97/193/CFSP, the measures imposed by the Common Position should be lifted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Common Position 97/193/CFSP, the measures imposed by the Common Position should be lifted.

| (3) | Common Position 97/193/CFSP should therefore be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Common Position 97/193/CFSP should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Common Position 97/193/CFSP is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2018.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  Common Position 97/193/CFSP of 17 March 1997 defined by the Council on the basis of Article J.2 of the Treaty on European Union, on restrictive measures aimed at persons having perpetrated violent acts during the incidents in Mostar on 10 February 1997 (OJ L 81, 21.3.1997, p.1).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
DATA SCHEDULE RESTATED TO CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF SFAS 128 "EARNINGS PER
SHARE". RESTATEMENT RESULTED IN NO CHANGE TO PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EARNINGS PER
SHARE DATA AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          56,364
<SECURITIES>                                   105,782
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,973
<PP&E>                                         137,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 366,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,355
<BONDS>                                         54,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           697
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   366,105
<SALES>                                         95,943
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,679
<CGS>                                           39,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                        90
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10355]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA--00260; 00260A]


IMC Magnetics Corp., Eastern Division, Hauppauge, NY and New 
England Alloys, Inc., Lawrence, MA; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department 
of Labor issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
Assistance on November 29, 1994, applicable to all workers of the 
Eastern Division of IMC Magnetics in Hauppauge, New York. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on December 16, 1994 (59 FR 
65078).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
New England Alloys, Inc., is a subsidiary of IMC Magnetics and has 
closed its operation on March 31, 1995 as a result of a reduced demand 
for its components by IMC Magnetics. Accordingly, the Department is 
amending the certification to include all workers of New England 
Alloys, Inc., in Lawrence, Massachusetts.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected by increased imports of electrical 
motors.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--00260 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of the Eastern Division of IMC Magnetics 
Corporation in Hauppauge, New York and New England Alloys, Inc., in 
Lawrence, Massachusetts who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after December 8, 1993 are eligible to apply 
for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of April 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-10355 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
H. Con. Res. 127 Agreed to September 25, 2024

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR THE UNVEILING OF 

MARTHA HUGHES CANNON STATUE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor 

Center is authorized to be used for an event on December 11, 

2024, to unveil a statue of Martha Hughes Cannon. 

(b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the conduct of 

the event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect 

of the Capitol. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
EX-35.1
TMST 2007-3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the
"Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer's
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
22nd day of February 2008.



By: /s/ Jeanne M. Bader
Name: Jeanne M. Bader
Title: Senior Vice President
Director of Loan Administration
thriftamendment15.htm


     

    
      

      

    

    Exhibit 10.4


    COLUMBUS
McKINNON CORPORATION THRIFT 401(K) PLAN

    AMENDMENT
NO. 15 OF THE 1998 PLAN RESTATEMENT

    


    


    Columbus McKinnon Corporation (the
"Corporation") hereby amends the Columbus McKinnon Corporation Thrift 401(K)
Plan (the "Plan"), as amended and restated in its entirety effective January 1,
1998, and as further amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 14, as permitted under
Section 14.1 of the Plan, as follows:

    


    1.           Section
3.2, entitled “Matching Contributions,” is amended effective January 31, 2009 by
changing Section 3.2(b) to read as follows:

    


    (b)           Amount and Allocation of
Contribution

    .  The
Matching Contribution required to be made on behalf of a Participant under
Section 3.2(a) shall be an amount equal to 50 percent of the Salary Reduction
Contributions made on behalf of the Participant during Plan Years ending before
2009 and during the first two months of  2009.  Matching
Contributions made with respect to Salary Reduction Contributions made during
the first two months of 2009 shall not exceed 3.0 percent of the Participant’s
Base Pay for such months.  Beginning March 1, 2009, Matching
Contributions shall be made in such amount, or in no amount, as the Board of
Directors may determine in its discretion from year to year.  Matching
Contributions made with respect to the last ten months of 2009 and with respect
to subsequent Plan Years shall be allocated among Participants in proportion to
their respective Salary Reduction Contributions (but excluding Salary Reduction
Contributions in excess of 6 percent of Base Pay) made during the last ten
months of 2009 or subsequent Plan Year, as applicable.

     

    


    WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument of
amendment has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the Corporation this
27th day of January, 2009.

    


    COLUMBUS McKINNON
CORPORATION

    


    By        Karen L.
Howard                                  


    


    


    Title     Vice President - Finance
& CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 666 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 666

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Williams.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 7), 2022

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Williams.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Williams, Cr. No. 21-377, pending in 
        the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, is authorized to provide relevant 
testimony in the case of United States v. Williams, except concerning 
matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Mr. 
Schwager and any current or former officer or employee of his office in 
connection with the production of evidence authorized in section one of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
James R. SABOFF, Appellant, v. Kathleen R. SABOFF, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3123

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 7, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 15, 2019

Shannon L. Akins, of Law Offices of Shannon L. Akins, P.A., and David T. Roberts, of The Roberts Family Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Shannon McLin Carlyle, of Florida Appeals, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order granting a new trial.1*See* § 59.04, Fla. Stat. (2018) ("Upon the entry of an order granting a new trial, the party aggrieved may prosecute an appeal to the proper appellate court *without waiting for final judgment* ." (emphasis added)); *see also**Marley v. Saunders* , 249 So. 2d 30, 32 (Fla. 1971) (holding that party had right of appeal from trial court's order for new trial on issue of liability only, notwithstanding that order was not final judgment). Here, the trial judge acknowledged on the record that there was no justification for his failure to rule on this case for over a year and a half after the parties' submittal of written closing arguments and proposed final judgments. *See**Johnson v. Johnson* , So.3d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (holding thirty-three-month delay in ruling unreasonable and unacceptable); *McKenzie v. McKenzie* , 672 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (holding one-year delay in ruling unreasonable).

On remand, we direct the case be promptly assigned to a new judge. *McGoldrick v. McGoldrick* , 940 So. 2d 1275, 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (remanding for new trial before successor judge after delayed ruling). We encourage the successor judge to retry this case as soon as the interests of justice permit.

*713AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL BEFORE A SUCCESSOR JUDGE.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

1

Subsequent to the appeal of the trial court's order granting a new trial, we relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court to consider Appellant's motion to bifurcate. The trial court then entered a partial final judgment dissolving the parties' marriage. That order is not the subject of this appeal.