20962 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices

interstate or foreign commerce of

products comprised of endangered

fish or wildlife. Certificates of

Exemption, however, were issued to

those persons holding inventories of

such items before the effective date of

the Act. The information collection is

to: (1) grant the public exemption, and

(2) to provide information for

enforcement purposes.

Affected Public: Businesses or other forprofit institutions.

Frequency: Quarterly, and every 5 years.

Obligation: Mandatory.

OMB Desk Officer: Don Arbuckle, (202)

395–7340.

Agency: National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Title: Subsequent Purchaser Report.

Form Number: Agency: None; OMB

Number 0648–0079.

Type of Request: Extension of the

expiration date.

Burden: 150 hours; 150 respondents

filing 2 responses; Avg. Hours Per

Response is 30 minutes.

Needs and Uses: Under the Endangered

Species Act, it is illegal to engage in

interstate or foreign commerce of

products comprised of endangered

fish or wildlife. Those persons

holding a Certificate of Exemption are

allowed to sell items that they held

before the effective date of the Act.

For those persons purchasing such

items, they must file a report if they

plan to sell the item in ‘‘intrastate’’

commerce. This information is used

by enforcement officers to distinguish

between legal and illegal items.

Affected Public: Businesses or other forprofit institutions.

Frequency: On occasion.

Obligation: Mandatory.

OMB Desk Officer: Don Arbuckle, (202)

395–7340.

Agency: National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Title: Application for a Commercial

Fisheries Exemption Under Section

114 of the Marine Mammal Protection

Act (MMPA).

Form Number: Agency: None assigned;

OMB Number 0648–0224.

Type of Request: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Burden: 3,225 hours; 13,000

respondents; Avg. Hours Per

Response is 15 minutes.

Needs and Uses: The MMPA mandates

the protection and conservation of

marine mammals and makes the

killing or serious injury of marine

mammals, except under permit or

exemption, a violation of the Act.

Fishermen must register to obtain the

exemption. Without this system,

commercial fishermen incidentally

killing or injuring marine mammals

during their normal fishing activities

are in violation of the MMPA and

subject to prosecution.

Affected Public: Businesses or other forprofit institutions, individuals.

Frequency: Annually.

Obligation: Mandatory.

OMB Desk Officer: Don Arbuckle, (202)

395–7340.

Copies of the above information

collection proposals can be obtained by

calling or writing DOC Clearance

Officer, Gerald Tache ́, (202) 482–3271,

Department of Commerce, Room 5327,

14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230.

Written comments and

recommendations for the proposed

information collections should be sent

to Don Arbuckle, OMB Desk Officer,

Room 10202, New Executive Office

Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

Dated: April 24, 1995.

Gerald Tache ́,

Departmental Clearance Officer, Office of

Management and Organization.

[FR Doc. 95–10519 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–CW–M

International Trade Administration

Intent To Revoke Antidumping Duty

Orders and Findings and To Terminate

Suspended Investigations

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of intent to revoke

antidumping duty orders and findings

and to terminate suspended

investigations.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is notifying the public

of its intent to revoke the antidumping

duty orders and findings and to

terminate the suspended investigations

listed below. Domestic interested parties

who object to these revocations and

terminations must submit their

comments in writing no later than the

last day of May 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Panfeld or the analyst listed

under Antidumping Proceeding at:

Office of Antidumping Compliance,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution

Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20230,

telephone (202) 482–4737.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Department may revoke an

antidumping duty order or finding or

terminate a suspended investigation if

the Secretary of Commerce concludes

that it is no longer of interest to

interested parties. Accordingly, as

required by § 353.25(d)(4) of the

Department’s regulations, we are

notifying the public of our intent to

revoke the following antidumping duty

orders and findings and to terminate the

suspended investigations for which the

Department has not received a request

to conduct an administrative review for

the most recent four consecutive annual

anniversary months:

Antidumping Proceeding

Argentina

Rectangular Carbon Steel Tubing

A–357–802

54 FR 22794

May 26, 1989

Contact: Sally Hastings at (202) 482–

4366

Brazil

Iron Construction Castings

A–351–503

51 FR 17220

May 9, 1986

Contact: Hermes Pinilla at (202) 482–

3477

Japan

Impression Fabric

A–588–066

43 FR 22344

May 25, 1978

Contact: Joe Fargo at (202) 482–5345

South Korea

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings, Other

than Grooved

A–580–507

51 FR 18917

May 23, 1986

Contact: Thomas Schauer at (202) 482–

4852

Taiwan

Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe &

Tubes

A–583–008

49 FR 19369

May 7, 1984

Contact: Michael Heaney at (202) 482–

4475

Taiwan

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings, Other

Than Grooved

A–583–507

51 FR 18918

May 23, 1986

Contact: Wendy J. Frankel at (202) 482–

0367

If no interested party requests an

administrative review in accordance

with the Department’s notice of
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices 20963

opportunity to request administrative

review, and no domestic interested

party objects to the Department’s intent

to revoke or terminate pursuant to this

notice, we shall conclude that the

antidumping duty orders, findings, and

suspended investigations are no longer

of interest to interested parties and shall

proceed with the revocation or

termination.

Opportunity to Object

Domestic interested parties, as

defined in § 353.2(k)(3), (4), (5), and (6)

of the Department’s regulations, may

object to the Department’s intent to

revoke these antidumping duty orders

and findings or to terminate the

suspended investigations by the last day

of May 1995. Any submission to the

Department must contain the name and

case number of the proceeding and a

statement that explains how the

objecting party qualifies as a domestic

interested party under § 353.2(k)(3), (4),

(5), and (6) of the Department’s

regulations.

Seven copies of such objections

should be submitted to the Assistant

Secretary for Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Room B–099, U.S. Department of

Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230.

You must also include the pertinent

certification(s) in accordance with

§ 353.31(g) and § 353.31(i) of the

Department’s regulations. In addition,

the Department requests that a copy of

the objection be sent to Michael F.

Panfeld in Room 4203. This notice is in

accordance with 19 CFR 353.25(d)(4)(i).

Dated: April 18, 1995.

Joseph A. Spetrini,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.

[FR Doc. 95–10520 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–201–819]

Initiation of Antidumping Duty

Investigation: Light-Walled

Rectangular Pipe and Tube From

Mexico

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dorothy Tomaszewski or Erik Warga at

(202) 482–0631 or (202) 482–0922,

Office of Antidumping Investigations,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

D.C. 20230.

INITIATION OF INVESTIGATION:

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the

Act’’) are references to the provisions

effective January 1, 1995, the effective

date of the amendments made to the

Statute by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (URAA).

The Petition

On March 31, 1995, the Department of

Commerce (the Department) received a

petition filed in proper form by

Southwestern Pipe, Inc. (the petitioner),

one of two regional producers of lightwalled rectangular (‘‘LWR’’) pipe and

tube in Texas. A supplement to the

petition was filed on April 13, 1995.

In accordance with section 732(b) of

the Act, the petitioner alleges that

imports of LWR pipe and tube from

Mexico are being, or are likely to be,

sold in the United States in the region

of Texas at less than fair value within

the meaning of section 731 of the Act,

and that such imports are materially

injuring, or threatening material injury

to, the regional industry in Texas.

Since petitioner is an interested party

as defined under section 771(9)(C) of the

Act, petitioner has standing to file a

petition for the imposition of

antidumping duties.

On April 17, 1995, a Mexican

producer of subject merchandise named

in the petition, Hylsa S.A. de C.V.

(‘‘HYLSA’’), submitted a request that the

Department poll all domestic producers

of subject merchandise in the United

States. According to HYLSA, the

relevant industry for purposes of

determining petitioner’s standing

should be defined as the national

industry producing the subject

merchandise (see following Section for

details on this issue).

Determination of Industry Support for

the Petition

The petition contains an adequate

allegation that Texas is a regional

industry for the domestic like product;

this allegation includes data on both

factors required by section 771(4)(C) of

the Act. Under section 732(c)(4)(C), if

the petitioner properly alleges that the

industry is a regional industry, the

Department shall determine whether the

petition has been filed by or on behalf

of the industry by applying the

requirements set forth in the Act on the

basis of the production in the region.

Therefore, the Department has evaluated

industry support for the petition based

upon production in the region.

Section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act

requires that the Department’s industry

support determination, which is to be

made before the initiation of the

investigation, be based on whether a

minimum percentage of the relevant

industry supports the petition. A

petition meets the minimum

requirements if (1) domestic producers

or workers who support the petition

account for at least 25 percent of the

total production of the domestic like

product; and (2) those domestic

producers or workers expressing

support account for more than 50

percent of the production of the

domestic like product produced by that

portion of the industry expressing

support for, or opposition to, the

petition.

The petitioner, one of two known

regional producers of the domestic like

product, accounts for more than 50

percent of the total production of the

domestic like product in the region as

defined in the petition. The other

known producer in the region has

informed the Department that it

supports this antidumping petition.

Accordingly, the Department

determines that this petition is

supported by the regional industry in

Texas.

Scope of the Investigation

The merchandise subject to this

investigation is certain light-walled

welded non-alloy steel pipes and tubes,

of rectangular (including square) cross

section, having a wall thickness of less

than 4mm (‘‘LWR’’), regardless of

specification (ASTM, proprietary, or

other). These LWR pipes and tubes are

supplied with rectangular cross sections

ranging from 0.375×0.625 inch to 2×6

inches or with square sections ranging

from 0.375 to 4 inches.

The LWR pipe and tube that are the

subject of this petition are currently

classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)

heading 7306.60.50.00. Although the

HTSUS subheading is provided for

convenience and customs purposes, our

written description of the scope of this

investigation is dispositive.

Export Price and Normal Value

Export price was based on fourth

quarter 1994 (1) average c.i.f. unit value

of U.S. imports from Mexico, and (2)

prices from a salesman’s call sheets

recording sales lost to Mexican

competitors. The unit values based on

U.S. imports from Mexico were reduced

for foreign inland freight to derive exfactory prices. The prices based on

‘‘lost’’ sales were reduced for the

following costs: exporter’s mark-up

costs, broker commissions, U.S. import