20988 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices

ensure that the forms are completed

accurately and filed on time.

III. Request for Comments

Prospective respondents and other

interested parties are requested to

comment on the alternatives described

above and to prepare modifications or

refinements deemed useful. The

following general questions provide a

framework for the preparation of

responses and will be used by EIA in its

evaluation of the two alternatives.

For electric control area operators:

1. Do electric control area operators

telemeter each utility and nonutility

generators 10 megawatts and over? Is

output from generators under 10

megawatts telemetered by individual

unit or aggregated by type of unit at

each power plant? Are power plants

under 1 megawatt telemetered?

2. Do electric control area operators

acquire monthly data (either electronic

or manual) on fuel consumption by

power plant or by generating unit? Is

fuel consumption by nonutilities

collected on any basis?

3. Do electric control area operators

acquire data (either electronically or

manually) on fuel stocks at power

plants?

4. What format(s) would electric

control area operators prefer when

providing electronic data to EIA? What

facilities/equipment do control area

operators have to electronically send

data to EIA?

5. How soon after the end of each

month could electric control area

operators provide electronic data to

EIA? Manually prepared data?

6. What modifications to electric

control area computer systems would be

necessary to provide monthly electronic

data on generation from all generators

10 megawatts and over? What length of

time would be necessary to implement

those modifications? How much would

these modifications cost?

7. What modifications to systems and/

or manual procedures would be

necessary to provide monthly data on

fuel consumption from all generators 10

megawatts and over? What length of

time would be necessary to implement

these modifications? How much would

these modifications cost?

8. What modifications to systems and/

or manual procedures would be

necessary to provide monthly data on

power plant fuel stocks. What length of

time would be necessary to implement

these modifications? How much would

these modifications cost?

9. What is the estimated monthly

burden in person-hours to provide

electronic data on electricity output

from all generators 10 megawatts and

more? Fuel consumption by generating

unit? Plant fuel stocks?

10. Is monthly electricity output by

generator, monthly fuel consumption by

generating unit, or plant fuel stocks

considered confidential? Why?

For nonutility power producers:

11. Do nonutility power producers

maintain monthly records on electricity

output by generator, fuel consumption

by generating unit, and plant fuel

stocks? Are these data currently

recorded in an electronic format?

12. What format(s) would nonutilities

prefer when providing generation, fuel

consumption, and fuel stock data to

EIA? What facilities/equipment do

nonutilities have to electronically send

data to EIA?

13. How soon after the end of each

month could nonutility power

producers provide generation and fuel

consumption by unit, and plant fuel

stock data to EIA?

14. What modifications to systems

and/or manual procedures would be

necessary to provide monthly

generation and fuel consumption by

unit, and plant fuel stock data to EIA?

15. What is the estimated monthly

burden in person-hours to provide

generation and fuel consumption by

unit, and plant fuel stocks data to EIA?

16. Are monthly generation, fuel

consumption, or fuel stock data

considered confidential? Why?

For data users:

17. Does the lack of monthly

electricity output from nonutility

producers adversely impact your use of

EIA data? Lack of monthly fuel

consumption data from nonutilities?

Lack of fuel stock data from

nonutilities? How?

18. What level of accuracy do you

need for monthly U.S. electricity

generation and fuel consumption by the

electric power industry?

19. Do you need generation, fuel

consumption, or fuel stock data by unit,

plant, or company? What level(s) of

aggregation are useful to you?

20. For what purposes do you or

would you use monthly generation, fuel

consumption and/or fuel stock data?

Please be specific.

21. What are the weaknesses and

strengths of the data collection

alternatives under consideration by

EIA? Please be specific as it relates to

your use of the data.

22. Would a determination by EIA

that generation, fuel consumption, or

fuel stock data by plant are confidential

affect your use of the data?

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will become a matter of

public record.

Statutory Authorities: Section 2(a) of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L.

No. 96–511), which amended Chapter 35 of

Title 44 of the United States Code [See 44

U.S.C. § 3506(a) and (c)(1)].

Issued in Washington, DC, April 24, 1995.

Yvonne M. Bishop,

Director, Office of Statistical Standards,

Energy Information Administration.

[FR Doc. 95–10517 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER95–748–000, et al.]

Western Gas Resources Power

Marketing, Inc., et al.; Electric Rate and

Corporate Regulation Filings

April 21, 1995.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Western Gas Resources Power

Marketing, Inc.

[Docket No. ER95–748–000]

Take notice that on April 14, 1995,

Western Gas Resources Power

Marketing, Inc. tendered for filing an

amendment in the above-referenced

docket.

Comment date: May 5, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Washington Water Power Co.

[Docket No. ER95–806–000]

Take notice that on March 27, 1995,

The Washington Water Power Company

(WWP), tendered for filing Service

Agreements previously accepted under

Electric Tariff No. 4 as unsigned service

agreements: Associated Power Services,

Inc., Citizens Power & Light

Corporation, Electric Clearinghouse,

Inc., Enron Power Marketing, Inc.

InterCoast Power Marketing Company,

LG&E Power Marketing, Inc., National

Electric Associates (L.P.) and Power

Exchange Corporation.

Comment date: May 5, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. CNG Power Services Corporation

[Docket No. ER95–840–000, Docket No.

ER95–846–000]

Take notice that on April 6, 1995,

CNG Power Services Corporation filed a

letter withdrawing its filings in the

above-referenced dockets.

Comment date: May 5, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices 20989

4. Florida Power Corp.

[Docket No. ER95–848–000]

Take notice that on March 28, 1995,

Florida Power Corporation tendered for

filing an amendment to its agreement

with Seminole Electric Cooperative for

supplemental resale service and

distribution service.

Comment date: May 5, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. UtiliCorp United Inc.

[Docket No. ES95–29–000]

Take notice that on April 13, 1995,

UtiliCorp United Inc. filed an

application under § 204 of the Federal

Power Act seeking authorization to

issue, from time to time, unsecured

notes and other obligations, including

guarantees of securities issued by

subsidiaries or affiliates, up to and

including $400 million in the aggregate

at any one time outstanding, during the

period commencing July 1, 1995 and

ending June 30, 1997, with a final

maturity date not later than June 30,

1998.

Comment date: May 12, 1995, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraphs

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before the

comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10532 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Docket No. EL95–40–000 and Docket No.

QF89–58–001]

Mega-Racine Associates, Inc.; Notice

of Filing

April 24, 1995

On April 21, 1995, Niagara Mohawk

Power Corporation (Niagara Mohawk)

filed a petition for a declaratory order

revoking the qualifying status of a

topping-cycle cogeneration facility

owned by Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.

in Canton, New York. The facility was

granted certification as a qualifying

cogeneration facility in an order dated

January 27, 1989. Megan-Racine

Associates, Inc., 46 FERC ¶ 62,074,

(1989). Niagara Mohawk claims in its

petition that for the years 1991, 1992,

1993, and 1994 the facility did not meet

the applicable operating and efficiency

standards applicable to natural gasfired, topping-cycle qualifying

cogeneration facilities under section

292.205 of the Commission’s

regulations. 18 CFR 292.205. Niagara

Mohawk asks the Commission to

declare that the facility was not a

qualifying facility for the years 1991,

1992, 1993, and 1994 and asks the

Commission to revoked certification for

the years 1991, 1992, 1993 and 1994.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 825

North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington,

D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules

211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

285.211 and 385.214 (1992)). All such

motions or protests should be filed on

or before May 22, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10482 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[RP95–31–000]

National Fuel Gas Supply Corp.; Notice

of Informal Settlement Conference

April 24, 1995.

Take notice that an informal

settlement conference will be convened

in these proceedings on May 3, 1995 at

10 a.m. at the offices of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 810

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.,

20426, for the purpose of exploring the

possible settlement of the issues in this

proceeding.

Any party, as defined by 18 CFR

385.102(c), or any participant as defined

by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to

attend. Persons wishing to become a

party must move to intervene and

receive intervenor status pursuant to the

commission’s Regulations (18 CFR

385.214).

For additional information, contact

Marc G. Denkinger (202) 208–2215 or

Arnold H. Meltz (202) 208–2161.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10451 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL 5196–7]

Sole Source Aquifer Designation for

the Broad Brook Basin of the Barnes

Aquifer

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In response to a petition from

the Barnes Aquifer Protection Advisory

Committee and the Town of

Easthampton, Massachusetts, notice is

hereby given that the Regional

Administrator of the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency—New

England (EPA) has determined that the

Broad Brook Basin of the Barnes Aquifer

satisfies all determination criteria for

designation as a sole source aquifer,

pursuant to Section 1424(e) of the Safe

Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C., section

300h–3(e). The following findings were

made in accordance with the

designation criteria: the Broad Brook

Basin of the Barnes Aquifer supplies

more than 50% of the water needs for

the communities within the service area

boundaries; there are no viable

alternative sources of sufficient supply;

the boundaries of the designated area

and the project review area have been

reviewed and approved by the EPA;

and, if contamination were to occur, it

would pose a significant public hazard

and a serious financial burden to the

communities within the aquifer service

area. As a result of this action, the EPA

may review, suggest modifications to, or

withhold funding for, any federally

financially assisted projects proposed

for construction within the Broad Brook

Basin of the Barnes Aquifer that may

pose an adverse risk of ground water

contamination.

DATES: This determination shall become

effective May 12, 1995.

ADDRESSES: The data upon which these

findings are based are available to the

public and may be inspected during

normal business hours at the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency—New