alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w34






Exhibit 10.34




BIOGEN IDEC INC.

2003 OMNIBUS EQUITY PLAN




AMENDMENT




     The Biogen Idec Inc. 2003 Omnibus Equity Plan (“the Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:


In paragraph (d) of Section 3 (“Stock Subject to the Plan”), the words “with respect to dividends
or distributions of cash or other non-stock property” are hereby added immediately after the words
“unless otherwise determined by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion”.




Date: October 13, 2008
Tyrone BLACKSHEAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1583

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(A) AND 15d-14(A)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Solar Enertech Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness
of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report
any change in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small
business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and




---



##### 



5.
    
    The small business issuers other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business
issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 9, 2007
    
    By: /s/ Ming Wai Anthea ChungMing Wai Anthea ChungChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The undersigned officer of ECC Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

Dated: November 14, 2006

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Cono Italiano, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mitchell Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)  The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2012



|By: | /s/ Mitchell Brown                      | 
|--- | --------------------------------------- | 
|    | Name:    Mitchell Brown                
|    | Title:      Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
                                                                    ------------
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paul W. Mobley, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noble Roman's,
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (that registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: August 9, 2007         /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                             -------------------------
                             Paul W. Mobley
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 13

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 23-23 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q DATED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              96
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      96
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               62
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          34
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        96
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,261
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Christopher Lee PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-36

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 31, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 8, 2019

Christopher Lee Payne, Punta Gorda, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*702Christopher Lee Payne appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the summary denial of all but one of the grounds raised in his motion. Because the record does not conclusively refute Payne's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call two exculpatory witnesses, we reverse the summary denial of Ground O. *See* *Castro v. State*, 240 So. 3d 877, 878 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (reversing summary denial of defendant's rule 3.850 motion because trial court's inquiry into whether defendant was satisfied with counsel and whether counsel did everything defendant "told him to do" was not specific enough to conclusively refute defendant's claim counsel was ineffective for failing to call witness (citing *Evans v. State*, 210 So. 3d 704, 705 n.1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) )); *Fletcher v. State*, 177 So. 3d 1010, 1014 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (reversing summary denial of defendant's rule 3.850 motion because trial court's inquiry into whether defendant was satisfied with counsel and whether counsel did everything defendant wanted was not specific enough to conclude defendant should have taken opportunity to advise trial court that defense counsel should have called two witnesses). We would typically remand for the trial court to attach records conclusively refuting the claim or for an evidentiary hearing. *Freeman v. State*, 761 So. 2d 1055, 1061 (Fla. 2000) (citing *Maharaj v. State*, 684 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1996) ). Instead, because Payne failed to allege his witnesses were available and willing to testify at trial, *see* *Castro*, 240 So. 3d at878 (citing *Spellers v. State*, 993 So. 2d 1117, 1118 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) ), we remand with instructions that the trial court strike Ground O and provide Payne with sixty days to amend. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(3) ; *see also* *Leonardi v. State*, 199 So. 3d 1075, 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) ("A defendant who has filed a legally insufficient rule 3.850 motion must be given at least one opportunity to correct the deficiency, unless it is apparent that the defect cannot be corrected." (citing *Luckey v. State*, 979 So. 2d 353, 355 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) )).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

BERGER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA 23

- 056 6

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JORY JERAE SONGER

,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

UPON the Defendant’s unopposed motion for extension, good cause

appearing therefrom,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline to file the opening brief in this

matter is extended to J une 12, 2024.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 13 2024

05/13/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0566
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<CASH>                                           11562
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            3445
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 13375
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      99617
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         175796
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  316199
<DEPOSITS>                                      275858
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2794
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       30047
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  316199
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  11072
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4892
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   442
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 16406
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 130
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6190
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            10346
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      975
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   7607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4596
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        4596
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3091
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.87
<LOANS-NON>                                        907
<LOANS-PAST>                                       617
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   558
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2967
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2190
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      131
<RECOVERIES>                                       391
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3425
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1724
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1701 
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W. Mobley,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                 /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                 ---------------------------------------------

                                 Paul W. Mobley
                                 Chief Executive Officer of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                 August 13, 2002
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00400

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding 158th District Court of Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 22

- 3718

- 158

Before Bassel, Kerr , and Wallach , JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### N OBLE 

### C LASSIC 

### H OMES 

### , I NC



### . , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and mo ti on for emergency stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : O c tober 13, 2022
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

h1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147216

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147216

COA: 308784

Allegan CC: 11

- 017215

- FH

STEVEN TYRELL WHITE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
United States District Court

Northern District of California

Document Locator

Case Number:

Date Filed:

Document Type:

Reporter's Transcript:

Trial Exhibits:

Lodged Documents:

Sealed Documents:

Other:

Location:

Expando File:

(located next to file)

Overflow Shelf:

Vault:

Other:

3/

Document Number:

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 245 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 1
Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK   Document 75-2   Filed 11/03/17   Page 1 of 6

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK   Document 75-2   Filed 11/03/17   Page 2 of 6

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK   Document 75-2   Filed 11/03/17   Page 3 of 6

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK   Document 75-2   Filed 11/03/17   Page 4 of 6

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK   Document 75-2   Filed 11/03/17   Page 5 of 6

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK   Document 75-2   Filed 11/03/17   Page 6 of 6