alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Shawn E. HAMMONDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-483

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 28, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John J. Quicke, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Adaptec, Inc. for the quarter ended July 2, 2010 (the Form 10-Q), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the quarterly periods covered by the Form 10-Q.



|                      |  |                                               
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                      |  | By: /s/ JOHN J. QUICKE                        
|Date: August 11, 2010 |  | John J. Quicke Interim
Chief Executive Officer

I, Mary L. Dotz, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
Form 10-Q, that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.



|                      |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|                      |  | By: /s/ MARY L. DOTZ                
|Date: August 11, 2010 |  | Mary L. Dotz Chief
Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6292

RONNIE CLARENCE HEADEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-02-475) Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Clarence Headen, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie Clarence Headen, a Virginia prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Headen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 696 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 696

  Recognizing the American people's commitment to rebuilding Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2022

 Mr. Manchin (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Blumenthal, 
  Mr. Portman, and Ms. Duckworth) submitted the following resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the American people's commitment to rebuilding Ukraine.

Whereas Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine has generated massive levels of 
        human and economic suffering in the sovereign nation of Ukraine;
Whereas, according to the United Nations Human Rights Council, Putin's war has 
        caused more than 7,000,000 civilians to flee from Ukraine since February 
        24, 2022;
Whereas, according to the World Bank, Putin's war will cause Ukraine's economy 
        to shrink by 45.1 percent during 2022;
Whereas, according to the World Bank, Putin's war in Ukraine has created almost 
        $60,000,000,000 worth of damage to buildings and infrastructure; and
Whereas Ukrainian civilians are being killed every day and the true number of 
        Ukrainian civilian casualties might never be known: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes that the United States--
                    (A) has long sought to alleviate the suffering of 
                civilians and nations hurt by war; and
                    (B) remains committed to ensuring the long-term 
                peace, prosperity, and territorial integrity of 
                Ukraine;
            (2) recognizes that aid packages, such as the Marshall 
        Plan--
                    (A) helped Western Europe recover from the economic 
                damage and human suffering generated by World War II; 
                and
                    (B) did much to promote the stability of global 
                good order nations enjoy today;
            (3) recognizes that an effective Ukrainian reconstruction 
        effort can only be accomplished by working in concert with 
        other nations and international bodies; and
            (4) encourages the United States Government to lead an 
        international group of allies that will equitably contribute to 
        provide the Government of Ukraine and the Ukrainian people with 
        a reconstruction assistance package for the purpose of 
        increasing ties between nations that are seeking a stable 
        international order to counter malign and rogue actors.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:05-cv-01946-MHP Document 30 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 2Case 3:05-cv-01946-MHP Document 30 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 836 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 836

   Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares 
 during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2022

    Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Moran) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares 
 during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND HOUSEWARES DURING 
              THE HOLIDAY SEASON FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 
              BUILDINGS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules 
or regulations of the Senate--
            (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may collect from another Senator, officer of the Senate, 
        or employee of the Senate within a Senate building or other 
        office secured for a Senator nonmonetary donations of clothing, 
        toys, food, and housewares for charitable purposes related to 
        serving persons in need or members of the Armed Forces and the 
        families of those members during the holiday season, if the 
        charitable purposes do not otherwise violate any rule or 
        regulation of the Senate or Federal law; and
            (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may work with a nonprofit organization with respect to 
        the delivery of donations described under paragraph (1).
    (b) Expiration.--The authority provided by this resolution shall 
expire at the end of the second session of the 117th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
Leon SNIPES, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS; and Leon Snipes, petitioner, v. Illinois.

No. 12-9827.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust
(the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, not in its individual
capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its
knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Trust.  BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FORSABINE ROYALTY TRUST  By:
    /s/ Ron E. Hooper Ron E. HooperSenior Vice President, Royalty Management Date: November 5, 2007 A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and
will be retained by Sabine Royalty Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY

CORPORATION,

 Plaintiff,

 -vVIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

 Defendant.

*E-FILED - 5/31/06*

CASE NO.: C-05-01668-RMW

SEALING ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that VIA’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of NonInfringement Based on the AMD License and Notice Dates; Declaration of Murray Levi Regarding

VIA’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement Based on the AMD License and

Notice Dates; Declaration of Jennifer Ochs in Support of VIA’s Summary Judgment Motions for

(1) Non-Infringement; (2) Invalidity Due to Indefiniteness; (3) Based on the AMD License and

Notice Dates shall be filed under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 31, 2006

___________________________

 RONALD M. WHYTE

 United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 132 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Copy of Order E-Filed to Counsel of Record:

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 132 Filed 05/31/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1248 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1248

    To amend the National Labor Relations Act to prevent government 
 agencies from requiring or prohibiting employers in the construction 
      industry to enter into agreements with labor organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2005

  Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Pence, Mr. 
    Hensarling, Mr. King of Iowa, and Mr. Marchant) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the National Labor Relations Act to prevent government 
 agencies from requiring or prohibiting employers in the construction 
      industry to enter into agreements with labor organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Government Labor Neutrality Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. MANDATE OF GOVERNMENT LABOR NEUTRALITY TOWARD EMPLOYERS COVERED 
              UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.

    Section 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158(e)) 
is amended by adding at the end of the first proviso the following: 
``Provided further, That notwithstanding any other provision of this 
Act, an agency or department of the Government, an agent acting on the 
Government's behalf, a recipient of a Federal grant or financial 
assistance, a person who has entered into a cooperative agreement with 
the Government, a State or political subdivision thereof, shall not 
require or prohibit an employer in the construction industry to enter 
into an agreement with a labor organization in connection with any 
construction, alteration, painting, or repair work.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Victor Ivan ESCUDERO-SATO; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70902.

Agency Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 2004.*

Decided April 23, 2004.

Charles E. Nichol, Law Office of Charles E. Nichol, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri J. Seadron, John D. Williams, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before B. FLETCHER, WARDLAW, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Victor Ivan Escudero-Sato and his wife Rosa Victoria Balta de Escudero, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a. See *Kalaw v. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We review for substantial evidence, *Navas v. INS,*217 F.3d 646, 657 (9th Cir.2000), and we grant the petition for review.

The Petitioners’ contention that the BIA’s streamlining procedures violate due process is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 850-51 (9th Cir. 2003).

The IJ’s decision denying the Petitioners’ application for asylum and withholding of deportation is not supported by substantial evidence because Escudero established *482past persecution through his credible testimony indicating that he was physically attacked on two occasions due to his political activities in Peru. *See Navas,*217 F.3d at 656 *&*n. 9. Because the Petitioners have established past persecution, they are entitled to a rebuttable presumption that they will suffer future persecution if returned to Peru. *See id.*at 657.

Accordingly, we remand for further consideration of whether the Petitioners are otherwise eligible for relief. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brett  Henrichsen,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Masterbeat  Corporation  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such
Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  fairly  presents  in all  material  respects  the
financial condition and results of operations of Masterbeat Corporation.


Date: April 22, 2010                   By: /s/ Brett Henrichsen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Brett Henrichsen
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Annual  Report on Form 10-K  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes  of  Section  18 of the  Exchange  Act,  or  otherwise  subject  to the
liability  of  that  section.  This  certification  shall  not be  deemed  to be
incorporated  by  reference  into any  filing  under the  Securities  Act or the
Exchange  Act,  except to the extent that  Masterbeat  Corporation  specifically
incorporates it by reference.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

VICTOR THOMAS, : No. 34 MAP 2023 

Appellant 

V. 

PENNA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, AND 

ZACHARY J. MOSLAK, CHIEF HEARING 

EXAMINER; AND KEVIN RANSOM, 

SUPERINTENDENT, STATE 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE AT DALLAS, 

Appellees 

ORDER

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 528 

MD 2022 dated February 13, 2023 

PER CURIAM DECIDED: January 29, 2024 

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2024, the order of the Commonwealth Court 

is AFFIRMED.
Adam Russell MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2818

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 12, 2019

Adam Russell Miller, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Adam Miller appeals his convictions and sentences after pleading to four counts of scheme to defraud over $ 50,000 and one count of scheme to defraud over $ 20,000. We affirm Miller's convictions and sentences without further comment. However, because the order of probation erroneously omits Miller's sentence on count three, we remand for the correction of the written probation order to conform to the oral pronouncement on count three. *See**Powell v. State*, 223 So.3d 412, 414 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ; *Williams v. State*, 604 So.2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11191]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7139

[AZ-930-1430-01; AZA 26964]


Withdrawal of National Forest System Land for Houston Mesa 
Campground; Arizona

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order withdraws 320 acres of National Forest System land 
from mining for 20 years to protect the Houston Mesa Campground site. 
The land has been and will remain open to mineral leasing and other 
uses authorized by the Forest Service.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 8, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Mezes, BLM Arizona State Office, 
P.O. Box 16563, Phoenix, Arizona 85011, 602-650-0509.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Subject to valid existing rights, the following described 
National Forest System land is hereby withdrawn from location and entry 
under the United States mining laws (30 U.S.C. Ch. 2 (1988)), but not 
from leasing under the mineral leasing laws, to protect the Houston 
Mesa Campground site.

Gila and Salt River Meridian

T. 11 N., R. 10 E.,
    Sec. 27, N\1/2\.

    The area described contains 320 acres in Gila County.

    2. The withdrawal made by this order does not alter the 
applicability of those land laws governing the use of the National 
Forest System lands under lease, license or permit, or governing the 
disposal of their mineral or vegetative resources other than under the 
mining laws.
    3. This withdrawal will expire 20 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1988), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal be extended.

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 95-11191 Filed 5-5-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P