alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Alliance, Inc.,(the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven L. White, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     March 15, 2008/s/ Steven L. WhiteSteven L. WhiteChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Charles El-Moussa, President, Secretary and Treasurer of
Netfone, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Netfone, Inc. for the period
          ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Netfone, Inc.

Date: February 14, 2011


/s/ Charles El-Moussa
--------------------------------------------
Charles El-Moussa
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10402]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-245]


Northeast Nuclear Energy Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Northeast Nuclear Power Company (the licensee) to 
withdraw its May 27, 1994, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License No. DPR-21 for Millstone Nuclear Power 
Station, Unit 1, located in New London County, Connecticut.
    The proposed amendment would have added a new section to Technical 
Specification Section 6.17 which would have required that procedures be 
in place to provide for monitoring and sampling of emergency service 
water (ESW) discharge flow during accident conditions when a positive 
differential pressure cannot be maintained between ESW and low pressure 
coolant injection (LPCI) in the LPCI heat exchangers.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on June 7, 
1994, (59 FR 29448). However, by letter dated April 18, 1995, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated May 27, 1994, and the licensee's letter 
dated April 18, 1995, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. The above documents are available for public inspection at 
the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
Street NW., Washington DC, and at the local public document room 
located at the Learning Resource Center, Three Rivers Community-
Technical College, Thames Valley Campus, 574 New London Turnpike, 
Norwich, CT 06360.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of April 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James W. Andersen,
Project Manager, Project Directorate I-3, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-10402 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Dated:  3/27/2008                                                                       By: /s/  E. Todd Whittemore                                                                  Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Lehman XS Trust, Series 2007-15N (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications**(Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)Name:In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as ServicerDeutsche Bank National Trust Company, as CustodianGMAC Bank, as Sub-Contractor for GMAC Mortgage, LLC and Residential Funding Company, LLCGMAC Mortgage, LLC, as ServicerGMAC Mortgage, LLC, as Subservicer for GMAC Mortgage, LLC and Residential Funding Company, LLCIndyMac Bank, F.S.B., as ServicerLaSalle Bank National Association, as CustodianNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.Residential Funding Company, LLC, as ServicerU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and CustodianWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CustodianWestlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
EX-34.2
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers
300 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone (646) 471 3000
Facsimile (813) 288 6000

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholder of Chase Home Finance LLC:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria, that Chase Home Finance LLC (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
"Reporting Period"), for asset-backed securities transactions backed by prime
residential mortgages serviced on the Real Estate ("RE") servicing system where
the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period
(the "Platform"), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i),
1122(d)(4)(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for the asset-backed securities transactions backed by prime
residential mortgages serviced on the real estate ("RE") servicing system where
the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 25, 2008
# C_2018034EN.01002401.xml

| 31.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/24

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 January 2018

renewing the term of office of the President of the Boards of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office

(2018/C 34/07)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (1), and in particular Article 166(2) thereof,

1

Whereas,

on 21 November 2017, the Management Board of the European Union Intellectual Property Office decided to propose to the Council the extension of the term of office of Mr Théophilos MARGELLOS as President of the Boards of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office for a period of five years or until retirement age if retirement age is reached during the new term of office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The term of office of Mr Théophilos MARGELLOS as President of the Boards of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office is hereby renewed for the period from 1 October 2018 to 30 September 2023 or until retirement age if retirement age is reached during the new term of office.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 29 January 2018.

For the Council

The President

R. PORODZANOV

---

(1)  OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1
                                 MediaBay, Inc.

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Jeffrey Dittus, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MediaBay, Inc.;

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
      report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
      have:

      a.    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the registrant, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
            report is being prepared;

      b.    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
            of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c.    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
            evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):

      a.    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
            identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      b.    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal controls.


Date: March 31, 2005

                                              By: /s/ Jeffrey Dittus
                                                  -----------------------
                                                      Jeffrey Dittus
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
Thomas KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX-34.7
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 1500
191 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303-1943
USA

Tel: +1 404 220 1500
www.deloitte.com


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors of
LNR Partners Inc.
Miami Beach, Florida

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that LNR Partners Inc. (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities
transactions for which the Asserting Party served as special servicer, that
were completed on or after January 1, 2006, and that were registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria
229.1122(d)(1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), (3)(i)(D), (3)(ii), (3)(iii), (3)(iv), (4)(v),
(4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii) and (4)(xv), which management
has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company
with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were
limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have
included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included
in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period
specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for the commercial mortgage-backed securities Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 22, 2008


Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Kevin JOHNSON v. Commissioner Jeff DUNN, Alabama Department of Corrections, and Corizon - Health Care Provider

CR-17-0361

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Ct. of Civ. App.
#### Richard Davis HOUSTON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Eddie PEARSON, Warden, Respondent—Appellee. *121Richard Davis Houston, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie Pearson, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

Nos. 03-7717, 03-7911.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 19, 2004.

Decided April 28, 2004.

Richard Davis Houston, Appellant pro se. Mary Kathleen Beatty Martin, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Richard Davis Houston seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction because Appellant’s notices of appeal were not timely filed.

In civil cases such as the present one, parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, *see*Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order, issued August 26, 2003, was entered on the docket by the clerk on September 16, 2003. Appellant’s first notice of appeal, designated No. 03-7717, was filed October 17, 2003, one day out of time. Appellant’s second notice of appeal, apparently filed in response to the judgment of September 16 that entered the August order on the docket, was filed on November 9, 2003. This second appeal, designated No. 03-7911, was also untimely. Because Appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 20

- 00423

- CV

In re Javier Omar Elizondo, Sr

.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

R elator Javier Omar Elizondo, Sr. , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus an d

a motion for emergency stay. See T ex. R. App. P. 52.1, .10(a). We grant the motion and

temporarily s t ay all proceedings in the trial court pending fu rther order of this Court. See id.

R. 52.10(b). Further, the Court orders the real part y in interest to file a response to the petition

for writ of mandamus on or before September 15, 20 20.

It is order ed on August 25, 2020.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly
Exhibit 10.11


 





 


December 29, 2008


 


Donald
R. Dancer


 


Dear
Don:


 


Reference
is made to the letter dated March 6, 2008 from International Rectifier
Corporation (the “Company”) to you regarding your compensation agreement
and severance agreement (the “Compensation Agreement Letter”).


 


The
purpose of this letter is to supplement the terms of the Compensation Agreement
Letter to include terms and conditions designed to make any payments pursuant
to the Offer Letter compliant with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (including the Treasury Regulations and other
published guidance related thereto) (“Section 409A”).


 


Your
Compensation Agreement Letter is hereby modified as follows:


 


1.             Special Severance Payment.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
your Compensation Agreement Letter, you will only be entitled to receive the
benefits described in paragraph 4 thereof if you execute and deliver (and do
not revoke) a release agreement in the form set forth in paragraph 2(p) of
your Severance Agreement (as such term is defined in your Compensation
Agreement Letter) promptly but not later than fifty (50) days following your
termination.  Except to the extent the
specified employee provisions in Section 5 apply, any special severance
payment shall be made on the sixtieth (60th)
day following your separation from service.


 


2.             Gross-Up Payments.  Any gross-up payment due to you shall be made
by the end of the taxable year following the taxable year in which you remitted
the taxes to which the gross-up relates.


 


Except
as modified hereby, your Compensation Agreement Letter remains unmodified.  Please indicate your agreement with the
foregoing by signing where indicated below.


 


Regards,


 


	
  INTERNATIONAL
  RECTIFIER CORPORATION

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
  Its:
   Assistant Secretary

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Acknowledged
  and agreed:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Donald
  R. Dancer

  	
   

  
	
  Date:
Kendra LANE, Appellant, v. Neil Sinclair SCHREIBER, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2497

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.