alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10462]




=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

10 CFR Part 1703


FOIA Fee Schedule

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Update of FOIA fee schedule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board is publishing its 
annual update to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Fee Schedule 
pursuant to 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6) of the Board's regulations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenneth M. Pusateri, General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, 
(202) 208-6447.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FOIA requires each Federal agency 
covered by the Act to specify a schedule of fees applicable to 
processing of requests for agency records. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(i). On 
March 15, 1991 the Board published for comment in the Federal Register 
its proposed FOIA Fee Schedule. 56 FR 11114. No comments were received 
in response to that notice and the Board issued a final Fee Schedule on 
May 6, 1991.

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6) of the Board's regulations, the 
Board's General Manager will update the FOIA Fee Schedule once every 12 
months. Previous Fee Schedule updates were published in the Federal 
Register and went into effect, most recently, on May 1, 1994. 59 FR 
21640.

Board Action

    Accordingly, the Board issues the following schedule of updated 
fees for services performed in response to FOIA requests:

    Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Schedule of Fees for FOIA   
                                 Service                                
                  [Implementing 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6)]                  
Search or Review Charge............  $44 per hour.                      
Copy Charge (paper)................  $.05 per page or generally         
                                      available commercial rate         
                                      (approximately $.10 per page).    
Copy Charge (3.5'' diskette).......  $5.00 per diskette.                
Copy Charge (audio cassette).......  $3.00 per cassette.                
Duplication of Video...............  $25.00 per video;                  
                                     $16.50 for each additional video   
Copy Charge for large documents      Actual commercial rate.            
 (e.g., maps, diagrams).                                                
                                                                        

    Dated: April 25, 1995.
Kenneth M. Pusateri,
General Manager.
[FR Doc. 95-10462 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 15








TXU US Holdings Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU US Holdings Company (US
Holdings) and subsidiaries for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2003 and
2002, as indicated in our report dated May 15, 2003; because we did not perform
an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in US
Holdings' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-69554, 333-53296,
333-53296-01, 333-53296-02 and 333-53296-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 15, 2003
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Anto nio, Texas

April 2, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00745

- CR

Miguel G. MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR4203 Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appell ant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GR ANTED. The appellant ’ s brie f is due on or before May 1, 2020

. N o further extensions absent extenuating

circumstance

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of April, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 23.1





INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT





The Board of Directors


Fresh Start Private Holdings, Inc.


(an exploration stage company)




We consent to the use in the 10K of Fresh Start Private Holdings, Inc. (an exploration stage company) of our Auditors' Report dated March 29, 2011 on the balance sheet of River Exploration, Inc. (an exploration stage company) as at November 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 and the period from incorporation November 1, 2006 to November 30, 2010.







MACKAY LLP


CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS





\s\ MacKay LLPVancouver, British Columbia

CanadaOctober 15, 2011
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Marshall L. Mohr,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Adaptec, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)              evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a)               all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)              any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|                             | /s/ MARSHALL  L. MOHR     |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | Marshall L. Mohr          |
| Date: February 7, 2005 | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 100 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 100

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2024

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 2882.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2882, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following correction:
     Amend the title so as to read: ``Making further consolidated 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for 
other purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 22, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this filing of AOB Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), Michael Lin, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael Lin

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 18, 2006
Osteoporosis

What is osteoporosis?

Osteoporosis is a disease that causes very 

weak bones that break easily.

Who is at risk?

Anyone can get osteoporosis, but women 

are more likely to get it than men. You 

may be more likely to get it if you:

•Are over age 50

•Smoke

•Have a low body weight

•Have family members who had 

osteoporosis or broken bones

•Do not get enough exercise

•Drink alcohol (more than 3 drinks/day)

•Take certain medicines for a long time 

like seizure medicines or steroids

How do I know if I have 

osteoporosis?

There are tests that use either x-rays or 

sound waves to measure bone density. 

These tests are painless. Ask your doctor 

if you should be tested.

•X-ray tests, called DXA scans, examine 

your spine, hip, or wrist. DXA scans use 

very few x-ray waves.

•Newer sound wave tests, called 

ultrasounds, test your heel.

How is it treated?

There is no way to cure osteoporosis. 

There are things you can do to slow it 

down. Talk to your doctor to make a plan 

to keep your bones healthy.

FDA Office of Women’s Health 

www.fda.gov/womens
2017

Prescription Medicines

There are prescription medicines that you 

can take. These medicines come as a pill, 

a patch, or a shot (injection). Talk to your 

doctor, nurse, or pharmacist before you 

stop taking your medicine.

Bisphosphonates are a common type of 

drug given to slow bone loss. Your doctor 

may offer you other drugs.

•Talk to your doctor about how long you 

should take these medicines.

•Tell your doctor if you start having side 

effects like new pain in your hip or thigh. 

Some people who take these medicines 

had broken thigh bones.

•Some of these medicines may irritate 

your throat.

•Severe jaw bone problems may also be 

caused.

Dietary Supplements

Dietary supplements are products that 

people add to their diets. They include 

vitamins, powders, energy bars, and herbs.

Talk to your doctor before you take any 

dietary supplements. These may affect 

your other medicines and make you sick.

Lifestyle Changes

There are lifestyle changes you can make 

to lower your risk for osteoporosis.

•Stay physically active. Do weight bearing 

exercise like walking.

•Do not smoke.

•Limit alcohol use.

•Get enough calcium and vitamin D in 

your diet. Your doctor may suggest 

taking calcium and vitamin pills.

 This fact sheet was developed by the FDA Office of Women’s Health.

To get other women’s health resources, go to

www.fda.gov/womens

Osteoporosis
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYNTHIA A. DuBOSE, WE4428,

Petitioner,

v.

DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden,

Respondent.

Case No. 17-0837 SK (PR) 

ORDER OF TRANSFER

Petitioner seeks federal habeas review of a conviction from Butte County Superior 

Court, which lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. §

84(b). Petitioner is incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla, 

Madera County, which also lies within the venue of the Eastern District. See id. 

Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district 

of conviction, see 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); however, petitions challenging a conviction 

preferably are heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dannenberg 

v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993).

Because Butte County lies in the Eastern District of California, the court ORDERS 

that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas Local Rule 2254-3(b), and in the interest 

of justice, this petition be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of California. 

The clerk shall transfer this matter forthwith. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2017 _________________________

SALLIE KIM

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00837-SK Document 5 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 1
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS^, -*f

STATE OF TEXAS^ijf . -_ „._„„..„ „.„ _ 3 ^^V" ^SEBEEEr HTNFV BOWES

PENALTY FOR ——

5/28/2015 PRIVATE USE

HAINES, RODNEY STEVE TrJJCt.'N'o. A^WFSff

On this da^Ujg^Dplication for^l l'"07>Writ,,of Habeas Corpus has been received

and pj^pPffedtoinf*i§£urt " Abel Acosta, Clerk

0 2 1R

0002003152 JUN08 2015 g,
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Declaration

John M. Shoreman (pro hac vice)

McFADDEN & SHOREMAN

1050 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 500 

Washington, DC 20036 

jms@mcfaddenshoreman.com

Tel: 571-296-8450

Counsel for Defendant Libre by Nexus, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, 

GABRIELA PERDOMO ORTIZ, VICTOR 

HUGO CATALAN MOLINA, AND KEVIN 

CALDERON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON 

BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1- 50,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:17-cv-00755-CW

Action Filed: Attorney Declaration

DECLARATION

I, John M. Shoreman, counsel to Defendant Libre by Nexus, Inc. (“LBN”),

pursuant to the Court’s Order to Show Cause of December 12, 2022 [Dkt. 236] (the “Order”), 

hereby attest and declare under the penalties of perjury that on December 13, 2022, I served a 

copy of the Order on Micheal Donovan, Evan Ajin and Richard Moore via e-mail. Please be 

advised that Richard Moore is no longer an officer or director of LBN and owns no interest in the 

company.

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 237 Filed 12/14/22 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Declaration

Dated: December 14, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

McFADDEN & SHOREMAN

/s/ John M. Shoreman

John M. Shoreman

1050 Connecticut Ave., NW

Suite 500

Washington, DC 20036

(571) 296-8450

jms@mcfaddenshoreman.com

Counsel for Defendant Libre by Nexus, Inc.

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 237 Filed 12/14/22 Page 2 of 2
EX-10(m)







Exhibit 10(m)







			
	
	 	HARRIS CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	HOWARD L. LANCE
	 	1025 West NASA Boulevard
	Chairman, President and
	 	Melbourne, FL USA 32919
	Chief Executive Officer
	 	phone 1-321-724-3900
	 	 	 
	 
	 	www.harris.com






December 12, 2008




Mr. Timothy Thorsteinson

59 Farnham Avenue West

Toronto, Ontario M4V1 H6

Canada




Subject: Third Addendum to January 23, 2007 Letter of Agreement




Dear Tim:



We recently discussed the Company’s ongoing efforts to cause its compensation programs to become
compliant with the requirements of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code by the end of the
calendar year. In connection therewith, we have identified four (4) minor changes that need to be
made to your Letter of Agreement. This will confirm that we have discussed and agreed that your
January 23, 2007 Letter of Agreement, as revised and supplemented by addendums dated December 5,
2007 and July 30, 2008, remains effective through June 30, 2009, subject to the following
revisions:




	- 	 	 Any severance owed to you in the event that you are involuntarily
terminated without cause will be paid in a lump sum within 60 days
after the date you separate from service (subject to any
legally-required six month delay, as described in the addendum
dated July 30, 2008 to your Letter of Agreement). This will
achieve consistency among severance payout dates of Harris
Officers.
	 
	-  	 	If any severance owed to you is subject to the legally-required
six month delay described in the addendum dated July 30, 2008 to
your Letter of Agreement, such severance will be paid to you in a
lump sum on the first business day coincident with or next
following the date that is six months and one day following the
date on which you separate from service or, if earlier, within
ninety (90) days following your death.
	 
	-  	 	It shall be a condition to you receiving any severance owed to you
in the event that you are involuntarily terminated without cause
that you shall have executed and delivered to Harris, and not
revoked, a release of claims against Harris, such release to be in
the then standard form of release utilized by Harris.
	 
	- 	 	 The Company is in the process of modifying its Executive Severance
Agreement and financial estate planning perquisite in order to
comply with section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. You
acknowledge that (i) your Executive Severance Agreement will be
amended to conform to section 409A and that your agreement will be
the same as those offered to other Harris Officers (except that
yours will retain the provision for two years of base salary and
incentive compensation in the event of a qualifying termination
following a change in control) and (ii) you will receive estate planning assistance on the
same terms and conditions applicable to other Harris Officers.





If you have any questions with respect to this matter, please contact me or Jeff Shuman.



Sincerely,




/s/ Howard L. Lance




Accepted:



/s/ Timothy Thorsteinson                    

Timothy Thorsteinson



12/17/08        
            
                    

Date



assuredcommunicationsTM
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10567]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-238-000]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 25, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 19, 1995, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, 
to be effective May 4, 1995, the effective date of Order No. 577.

First Revised Sheet No. 191A
Second Revised Sheet No. 192
Second Revised Sheet No. 194
First Revised Sheet No. 388
First Revised Sheet No. 395

    In Order No. 577, the Commission modified its capacity release 
regulations to permit shippers to release firm capacity for a period of 
one calendar month or less without having to comply with advance 
posting and bidding requirements. A related change provides for a 28 
(rather than 30) day hiatus during which shippers that released 
capacity at less than the maximum rate under the exemptions cannot re-
release that capacity to the same replacement shipper at less than the 
maximum tariff rate.
    Columbia Gulf states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are 
being filed to revise the capacity release and assignment provisions 
and forms in the tariff to reflect changes mandated by Order No. 577. 
In addition, Columbia Gulf is shortening the duration of minimum 
posting periods for capacity release transactions.
    Columbia Gulf states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all firm customers and affected state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before May 2, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of Columbia 
Gulf's filings are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10567 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10362]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-30,793]


Phillips Petroleum Company, Odessa, Texas; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18 an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Phillips Petroleum Company, 
Odessa, Texas. The review indicated that the application contained no 
new substantial information which would bear importantly on the 
Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was 
issued.

TA-W-30,793; Phillips Petroleum Company
    Odessa, Texas (April 14, 1995)

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of April 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-10362 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M