alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 Written
Statement of Chief Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
 
 
 The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of The Wilber Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date
hereof:
 
 (a)
              the
      Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30,
      2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and
 
 (b)
              information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.
 
 
 /s/ Douglas C. GulottyDouglas
      C. GulottyPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  November 5,
      2009
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to The Wilber Corporation and will be retained
by The Wilber Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Derrick LITTLE, petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, et al.

No. 12-9338.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the amended annual report of Liberty Silver Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John Pulos, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ John PulosChief Financial Officer Date: Date: April 14, 2011
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 12, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 12, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0426. CHARLES E. KENDRICK v. SRA TRACK INC et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16V308
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Southwest Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 8, 2014
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 3 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 3 Filed 02/13/17 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 3 Filed 02/13/17 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 3 Filed 02/13/17 Page 4 of 4
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 38 74

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ty ro ne Ell is
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Nwann em

Obi -Ok oye, Doct or , Cor rect Care So lu ti on s; Bret t Bu tl er, Do ct or ,

Co rrec t Ca re So lu ti on s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es
Jo hn at ha n S imm on s, Do ct or , Cor rect Care So lu ti on s

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t
Geral di ne Cam

pb el l, Ad va nc edPrac ti ce Nu rs e, Co rrec t Ca re So lu ti on s; Aric Si m m on s, Ad va nc edPrac ti ce Nu rs e, Co rrec t Ca re So lu ti on s; Mel is sa Man sf ie ld , Lice ns edPrac ti cal Nurs e, Co rrec t Ca re So lu ti on s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s - P in e Bl uf f

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 12, 2 01 7 Fi le d: May 22, 2 01 7 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __Befo re LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ark an sa s in m at e Ty

ro ne Ell is ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s 1 a d v e r s e gr an t of

s umm ary jud gm en t in hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n, in whi ch he al le ge d t h a t de fen da nt s were de li be rat el y in di ffer en t to hi s se rio us m ed ic al ne ed s. Upo n care fu l de no vo rev ie w, se e Pet ers on v. Kop p , 7 54 F.3 d 59 4, 59 8 (8 th Ci r. 20 14 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w), we co nc lu de th at su m m ary jud gm en t was pr op er be cau se , as ex pl ai ne d by t h e di st ric t co ur t, Ell is fai le d to sh ow th at hi s sk in ras h was “ se rio us ,” or t h a t a n y de la y in tre at m en t ha d a de tri m en ta l effe ct on hi s co nd it io n. See Fo ur te v. Fau lk ne r Ct y ., Ark

. , 74 6 F.3 d 38 4, 38 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 14 ); se e al so Ja ck so n v. Ri eb ol d , 81 5 F.3 d 11 14 , 11 19 -2 0 (8 th Cir . 20 16 ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm
. See 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

1 The Hon or ab le Kris ti ne G. Bak er, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e East ern Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco m m en da tio n s of th e Hon or ab le Bet h Deere , Uni te d S ta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s. -2

-
EXHIBIT 2 

Case 5:17-cv-00373-LHK Document 112-2 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:17-cv-00373-LHK Document 112-2 Filed 08/23/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:17-cv-00373-LHK Document 112-2 Filed 08/23/18 Page 3 of 3
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1958

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa Jose Refugio Gil-Becerra, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 7, 2002 Filed: November 15, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jose Refugio Gil-Becerra appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Northern District of Iowa after he pleaded guilty to unlawfully reentering the United States following removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The district court sentenced Gil-Becerra to 12 months imprisonment to be followed by 1 year of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing for reversal that the guilty-2- plea was involuntary because Gil-Becerra was led to believe by his counsel that he would be sentenced to time served.We conclude that the district court did not plainly err in accepting GilBecerra’s guilty plea because he confirmed at his plea hearing that he realized, despite counsel’s prediction, that he could be sentenced to up to 2 years imprisonment. See United States v. Granados , 168 F.3d 343, 345 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam). Having found no nonfrivolous issues following our independent review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SETH BAINES

, 1

Respondent

/Petitioner Below

, Appellant,

v.

JENNIFER T. HUNTER

,

Petitioner / Respondent Below

, Appellee. §

§ No. 526, 2017

§

§ Court Below

— Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ File No. CN11

- 02650

§ Petition No s

. 17

- 30157

§ and 17

- 30452

§

§

Submitted: March 23, 2018

Decided: May 22 , 2018

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 22 nd day of May 2018 , upon consideration of th e parties’ briefs and the

record below

, the Court concludes that the November 14, 2017 Family Court order

granting the petitioner/respondent below

- appellee’s petition for a rule to show cause

should be affirmed. To the extent the respondent/petitioner below

- appellant claims

that the Family Court disregarded the evidenc e he offered or disputes the Family

Court’s factual findings, we cannot review those claims in the absence of a transcript

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).2

of the November 7, 2017 rule to show cause hearing. 2 The appellant has not

provided a transcript of the November 7, 2017 rule to sh ow cause hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family

Court is AFFIRMED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Karen L. Va lihura

Justice

2 Supr. Ct. R. 14(e) ( requiring that “the appellant's appendix shall contain such portions of the trial

transcript as are necessary to give this Court a fair and accurate account of the context in which

the claim of error occurred and must include a transcript of all evidence relevant to the challenged

finding or conclusion ” ); Tric oc h e v. State , 525 A.2d 151, 154 (Del. 1987) (holding the burden is

on the appellant to produce parts of the trial transcript that are necessary to give t he Court the

context of the claim ).
Case 5:17-cr-00068-EJD Document 39 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:17-cr-00068-EJD Document 39 Filed 02/22/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:17-cr-00068-EJD Document 39 Filed 02/22/17 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 89 (Tuesday, May 9, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24559-24560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11288]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 24560]]

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Public Land Order 7140

[AZ-930-1430-01; AZA 6592]


Revocation of Public Land Order No. 5298; Arizona

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order revokes in its entirety public land order No. 5298, 
which withdrew 1,062.70 acres of public lands for the expansion and 
protection of the Aravaipa Canyon Primitive Area. The lands have been 
incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System to be 
known as the Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness Area, and the withdrawal is no 
longer needed. The lands will remain closed to surface entry, mining, 
and mineral leasing as part of a wilderness area.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 8, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Mezes, BLM Arizona State Office, 
P.O. Box 16563, Phoenix, Arizona 85011, 602-650-0509.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Public Land Order No. 5298, which withdrew the following 
described lands for the protection and expansion of the Aravaipa Canyon 
Primitive Area, is hereby revoked in its entirety:

Gila and Salt River Meridian

T. 6 S., R. 18 E.,
    Sec. 15, S\1/2\S\1/2\;
    Sec. 24, S\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 25, W\1/2\E\1/2\, and W\1/2\.
T. 6 S., R. 19 E.,
    Sec. 19, lot 4;
    Sec. 30, lots 2 to 6, inclusive, SW\1/4\NE\1/4\, and W\1/2\SE\1/
4\.

    The areas described aggregate 1,062.70 acres in Pinal and Graham 
Counties.

    2. The lands will remain closed to all forms of entry due to the 
lands being within the Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness Area.

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 95-11288 Filed 5-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made as of February 4, 2009, and
is effective as of September 29, 2008, between Ames True Temper, Inc. (the “Company”) and Duane R.
Greenly (the “Executive”).




          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated as of June 28, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”); and




          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.




          NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that:





	 	1.	 	Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing “COO” each time such word
appears with “President and Chief Executive Officer”.
	 
	 	2.	 	Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing the first two sentences with
the following:
	 
	 	 	 	“Executive shall report to and be subject to the direction of the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of CHATT Holdings LLC (“CHATT”). Executive shall perform and discharge such duties
and responsibilities for the Company as the Board of CHATT may from time to time reasonably
assign Executive. Executive understands and acknowledges that such duties shall be subject
to revision and modification by the Board of CHATT, as appropriate, upon reasonable notice
to Executive.”
	 
	 	3.	 	Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing “$241,020” with
“$400,000.12”.
	 
	 	4.	 	Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
	 
	 	 	 	“Discretionary Bonus. During the portion of the Employment Period beginning
September 29, 2008, Executive shall be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus in such
amount, if any, as determined by the Board of CHATT in its sole discretion based upon the
achievement of goals and objectives approved by the Board of CHATT. Subject to the
foregoing sentence, the target annual bonus is 100% of Executive’s Base Salary.”




 









 












	 	5.	 	Section 9(b)(iii) of the Employment Agreement is amended by replacing “COO” with “President
and Chief Executive Officer”.
	 
	 	6.	 	Defined terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have meanings given them in the
Employment Agreement.
	 
	 	7.	 	This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to
be an original, but all of which counterparts collectively shall constitute one and the same
instrument.
	 
	 	8.	 	Except as amended hereby, all of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement are
hereby ratified and confirmed, and shall remain in full force and effect.










2









 











          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed the Amendment as of the date above written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	AMES TRUE TEMPER, INC.	 	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	          /s/ David M. Nuti
	 	 	 	/s/ Duane R. Greenly
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name: David M. Nuti	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	Duane R. Greenly






3
In re Dai NGUYEN, petitioner.

No. 12-10195.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

y0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141674 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141674 

 COA: 296792 

Jackson CC: 09-002234-AV 

BRIAN COOPER and LISA K. COOPER, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 16, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAMARI WILLIAM SINGLETON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANN TROMBETTA,

 Defendant.

Case No. 17-00806 EJD (PR) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the Santa Clara County Jail, filed the instant pro se

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 13, 2017, the Court issued an 

order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend. (Docket No. 4.) On June 26, 2017 

the Court’s order sent to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable because Plaintiff was no 

longer in custody. (Docket No. 6.) Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a new address 

and has had no further communication with the Court.

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-11 a party proceeding pro se must 

promptly file a notice of change of address while an action is pending. See L.R. 3-11(a). 

The Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint when: (1) mail directed to 

the pro se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable, and (2) the 

Court fails to receive within sixty days of this return a written communication from 
Order of Dismissal

PRO-SE\EJD\CR.17\00806Singleton_dis

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

the pro se party indicating a current address. See L.R. 3-11(b). 

More than sixty days have passed since the mail addressed to Plaintiff was returned 

as undeliverable. The Court has not received a notice from Plaintiff regarding a new 

address. Accordingly, the instant civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice 

pursuant to Rule 3-11 of the Northern District Local Rules. 

The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________________ ________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge

9/11/2017
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10968]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-254-000]


Williams Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

April 28, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 26, 1995, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet Nos. 243 and 244. The 
proposed effective date of these tariff sheets is June 1, 1995.
    WNG states that this filing is being made to eliminate unnecessary 
paperwork by not requiring service agreements on capacity releases 
which are: (1) For less than three months, (2) occur through the EBB, 
and (3) cannot generate more than $100,000 in reservation charges and 
reservation surcharges, calculated at 100% load factor for the duration 
of the release. Section 11.4(d) is modified to remove the requirement 
that earnest money must be paid on releases. First Revised Sheet No. 
244 is being filed for pagination purposes. These changes will make it 
easier for Shippers to utilize capacity release on WNG's system.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should 
be filed on or before May 5, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10968 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
John Peter WALTON, III, Doc #T97679, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2921

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.