alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Simmons Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
By: /s/ Ron Hooper
Ron Hooper

SVP, Royalty Trust Management

Simmons Bank

Date: May 3, 2019 
**
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00281

- CR

Leroy SANCHEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 186th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR13374 Honorable Andrew Carruthers , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 30, 2018
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant appears to be seeking to appeal an order for competency evaluation. An order for competency evaluation is not an appealable order. See Jackson v. State , No. 01

- 13

- 00561

- CR, 2014 WL 123838, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 14, 2014, no pe t.) (“Although written pretrial motions for psychiatric evaluations to determine competency and sanity were filed, the motions were granted and, therefore, do not provide a basis for appeal.”) (citing Woods v. State , 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App . 2003)); T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. art. 46B.011 (“ Neither04

- 18

- 00281

- CR

- 2

- the state nor the defendant is entitled to make an interlocutory appeal relating to a determination or ruling under Article 46B.005.”). On May 1, 2018, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing b y May 15, 2018 why th is appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not file a response. Because this court lacks jurisdiction to consider an interlocutory appeal of an order for competency evaluation, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Scott G. McNealy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/ Scott G. McNealyName:

Scott G. McNealyTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 94 

Designating the week beginning February 28, 2021, as ‘‘National Tribal 

Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2021 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. DAINES, Ms. SMITH, Ms. WARREN, Mrs. 

FISCHER, Mr. BARRASSO, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. CRAMER, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, 

Ms. BALDWIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. SCHATZ, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. INHOFE, 

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. THUNE, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. KELLY, 

Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. ROUNDS, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mr. 

HOEVEN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning February 28, 2021, as 

‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week’’. 

Whereas there are 37 Tribal Colleges and Universities operating on more than 75 campuses in 16 States; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are tribally chartered or federally chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique relationship with the 

Federal Government; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities serve students from 

more than 230 federally recognized Indian tribes; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 94 ATS 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities offer students access to knowledge and skills grounded in cultural traditions and values, including indigenous languages, 

which— 

(1) enhances Indian communities; and 

(2) enriches the United States as a nation; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities provide access to 

high-quality postsecondary educational opportunities 

for— 

(1) American Indians; 

(2) Alaska Natives; and 

(3) other individuals that live in some of the most 

isolated and economically depressed areas in the United 

States; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are accredited institutions of higher education that prepare students to succeed in the global and highly competitive workforce; 

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities have open enrollment policies, and approximately 15 percent of the students at Tribal Colleges and Universities are non-Indian 

individuals; and 

Whereas the collective mission and the considerable achievements of Tribal Colleges and Universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning February 28, 

3 2021, as ‘‘National Tribal Colleges and Universities 

4 Week’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups to observe National Tribal Colleges 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 94 ATS 

1 and Universities Week with appropriate activities 

2 and programs to demonstrate support for Tribal 

3 Colleges and Universities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

W

U

It i

the

Fir

(Dk

liab

any

me

the

Da

WAYMO LL

v. 

UBER TECH

Waymo

s currently s

e only date o

rst, the Court

kt. No. 1208

bility related

ything the C

eeting that W

This Or

e district cou

IT IS S

ated: August 

C, 

Plaintiff, 

HNOLOGIES

Defendants

o seeks to de

scheduled to 

ffered by Ub

t has the auth

8.) Second, W

d discovery” 

ourt has read

Waymo highl

rder disposes

urt on or befo

SO ORDER

15, 2017 

UNITED

NORTHER

S, INC., et al

s. 

epose Uber B

take the dep

ber and the l

hority to ord

Waymo’s ass

that Waymo

d. Third, nei

ights. 

s of Docket 

ore the close

RED. 

D STATES D

RN DISTRIC

l., 

Board memb

position of B

last day of fa

der depositio

sertion that t

o needs for i

ither of these

No. 1097. A

 of business 

DISTRICT C

CT OF CALI

Case No.17

ORDER D

MOTION 

UBER BO

DEPOSIT

Re: Dkt. N

bers Arianna

Board memb

act discovery

ons after the 

these witnes

its opening e

e witnesses a

Any objectio

 on August 

JA

Un

COURT 

IFORNIA 

7-cv-00939-

DENYING W

TO COMP

OARD MEM

TIONS 

No. 1097 

a Huffington 

ber Bill Gurle

y. Waymo’s

discovery cu

ses have “im

expert report

attended the 

ons to this O

16, 2017. 

ACQUELINE

nited States M

WHA (JSC

WAYMO'S 

PEL ADDIT

MBER 

and David B

ey on Augus

s motion is D

ut-off if appr

mportant dam

ts is unsuppo

April 11, 20

Order must be

E SCOTT C

Magistrate J

C) 

TIONAL 

Bonderman. 

st 24, 2017, 

DENIED. 

ropriate. 

mages and 

orted by 

016 Board 

e filed with 

ORLEY 

Judge 

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1211 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1967\orderresettlement.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONSTANCE ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-01967 CRB

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement

agreement and for sanctions. After carefully considering the papers filed by the parties, the

Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Local Rule 7-1(b), and DENIES

plaintiff’s motions. Plaintiff has not demonstrated that defendant is responsible for the delay

in defendant’s purchase of an annuity for plaintiff’s benefit.

Before plaintiff files any new motions to enforce the settlement, plaintiff must meet

and confer with defendants’ counsel to determine if the dispute can be resolved without

resort to the Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 31, 2008 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 66 Filed 03/31/08 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1967\orderresettlement.wpd 2

Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 66 Filed 03/31/08 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of The Wilber Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

      (a) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended March
      31, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by this report.


                                           /s/ Alfred S. Whittet
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Alfred S. Whittet
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date:  May 7, 2004


                                       23
Stip. Req. and [Proposed] Order 

CR 16-00516 HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

United States Attorney

BARBARA J. VALLIERE (DCBN 439353)

Chief, Criminal Division

BRIGID S. MARTIN (CABN 231705)

Assistant United States Attorney

1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 637-3680

FAX: (510) 637-3724

Brigid.Martin@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ANDRE MARTEL WINN, and

EDGAR DE LA CRUZ,

 a/k/a Edgar Della Cruz Martinez, a/k/a “BG,” a/k/a “BG&e,”

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)_

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 16-00516 HSG

PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME 

UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

Based on the assertions and agreement of the parties at the February 27, 2017 hearing, as 

set forth in the parties’ filed Stipulation, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between 

February 27, 2017, and March 27, 2017, would unreasonably deny defense counsel the 

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due 

diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served 

by excluding the time between February 27, 2017, and March 27, 2017, from computation under 

Case 4:16-cr-00516-HSG Document 28 Filed 03/03/17 Page 1 of 2
Stip. Req. and [Proposed] Order 

CR 16-00516 HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy 

trial. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between February 27, 2017, and 

March 27, 2017, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). 

DATED: ___________________ _______________________________

HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3/3/2017

Case 4:16-cr-00516-HSG Document 28 Filed 03/03/17 Page 2 of 2
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 468 

Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during the 

holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2021 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. MORAN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and 

housewares during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND 

3 HOUSEWARES DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON 

4 FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 

5 BUILDINGS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of the rules or regulations of the Senate— 

8 (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em9 ployee of the Senate may collect from another Sen10 ator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the Senate 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 468 ATS 

1 within a Senate building or other office secured for 

2 a Senator nonmonetary donations of clothing, toys, 

3 food, and housewares for charitable purposes related 

4 to serving persons in need or members of the Armed 

5 Forces and the families of those members during the 

6 holiday season, if the charitable purposes do not oth7 erwise violate any rule or regulation of the Senate 

8 or Federal law; and 

9 (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em10 ployee of the Senate may work with a nonprofit or11 ganization with respect to the delivery of donations 

12 described under paragraph (1). 

13 (b) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided by this 

14 resolution shall expire at the end of the first session of 

15 the 117th Congress. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Rel: May 17, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024

SC-2023-0526 Stephen D. Coker, Jr., Ann Coker Wing, Catherine Davis Coker, Quinton Scott Coker, and Caroline Coker Gehlken v. Douglas B. Davis (Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court: CV-20-901128). PARKER, Chief Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Wise, Sellers, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER REQUIRING

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO

CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

Defendants shall please respond to plaintiff Waymo LLC’s motion to continue the trial

date (Dkt. No. 1604) by TOMORROW AT 5:00 P.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 17, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1622 Filed 09/17/17 Page 1 of 1
EX-34.5
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800
Dallas TX 75201-2997
Telephone (214) 999 1400
Facsimile (214) 754 7991


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance, that First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas,
L.P. (the "Company" and an indirect subsidiary of The First American
Corporation) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for
residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the
Company served as the residential and commercial tax service provider (the
"Platform"), as of December 31, 2007 and for the year then ended, excluding
criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iii), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv),
1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv)-(xv), which the Company has determined are
not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the
Platform. Management's assertion identifies the individual securities defined by
management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and the servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent
to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential and
commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 12, 2008
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 466 

Expressing the sense of the Senate in support of the International Atomic 

Energy Agency’s (IAEA) nuclear security role. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 2, 2021 

Mr. LUJA ́N (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. MERKLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate in support of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) nuclear security role. 

Whereas the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 

created in 1957 for the purpose of assisting states in the 

development and use of nuclear technology for peaceful 

purposes, plays a critical role in the global nuclear security regime; 

Whereas the agency’s activities in nuclear security date back 

to the 1970s, when the agency began providing ad hoc 

training courses in physical protection; 

Whereas these responsibilities expanded following the collapse 

of the former Soviet Union, reports of nuclear smuggling 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 466 IS 

in the late 1990s, and again after the devastating terror 

attacks on September 11, 2001; 

Whereas the agency established the Nuclear Security Fund to 

assist countries in protecting their nuclear and radiological materials and facilities; 

Whereas the agency’s nuclear security efforts are sustained 

by its technical expertise, experience, transparency, and 

confidentiality; 

Whereas rogue regimes and clandestine organizations continue to exhibit the ambition to acquire nuclear materials 

that can be used to build crude radiological and nuclear 

weapons; 

Whereas the IAEA Office of Nuclear Security relies almost 

exclusively on voluntary funding, which is inherently unpredictable and inconsistent; and 

Whereas the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, 

DC, issued an Action Plan on April 1, 2016, citing the 

agency’s need for ‘‘reliable and sufficient resources’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) maintains that the International Atomic 

3 Energy Agency (IAEA) plays an indispensable role 

4 in strengthening nuclear security and safety around 

5 the globe; 

6 (2) reaffirms that the United States has a vital 

7 interest in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons 

8 and securing nuclear materials; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 466 IS 

1 (3) encourages the United States and other 

2 member states of the IAEA to take steps to ensure 

3 that the IAEA has the resources needed to success4 fully carry out its duties, including— 

5 (A) supporting the IAEA to continue con6 vening ministerial meetings on nuclear security 

7 to promote political commitment; 

8 (B) contributing to the implementation of 

9 the IAEA’s Nuclear Security Plan through reli10 able and sufficient resources; 

11 (C) providing appropriate political, tech12 nical, and financial support to the Nuclear Se13 curity Fund; and 

14 (D) developing a comprehensive strategy to 

15 encourage non-state, private sector contribu16 tions to the Nuclear Security Fund. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS