alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                               EXHIBIT 11.1

                                                 CASTLE ENERGY CORPORATION
                                       STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                      (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                                        (UNAUDITED)


                                                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                   -------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             2005                          2004
                                                                   -------------------------     -------------------------
                                                                     BASIC         DILUTED         BASIC         DILUTED
                                                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                                                 <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
I.   Shares Outstanding, Net of Treasury
       Stock Purchased During the Period:

          Stock, net                                                7,262,340      7,262,340      6,892,389      6,892,389
                                                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
          Purchase of treasury stock (weighted)                     7,262,340      7,262,340      6,892,389      6,892,389

II.  Weighted Equivalent Shares:

          Assumed options and warrants exercised                                                                   222,481
                                                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
III. Weighted Average Shares and Equivalent Shares                  7,262,340      7,262,340      6,892,389      7,114,870
                                                                   ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

IV.  Net Income (Loss)                                             $     (125)    $     (125)    $      343     $      343
                                                                   ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

V.   Net Income (Loss) Per Share                                        ($.02)         ($.02)          $.05           $.05
                                                                   ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Mobley, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                    /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Paul W. Mobley
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                                    Date: November 10, 2010
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00002

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 213th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1466397D
Before Kerr, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. M emor andum Opinion by J ustice Kerr 

### M ILES 

### J OSHUA 

### W OODS 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM O PINION Appellant Miles Joshua Woods plea ded guilty t o the second

- degree

- felony
offense of aggra vated assault with a deadly weapon (a less er

- included offense ) 1 in
excha nge for eight years of deferred

- adjudication commu nity supervis ion. See Tex.
Penal Co de Ann. § 22.02 (a)(2), (b)

. T he State subsequently petition ed to proceed to adjudication , and Woods pleaded true to t he State ’ s allegations. 2 T he trial court found the all egations tr ue , adjudicated Woods guilty, and sentenced him to 12 years ’ conf inement. See id. § 12.33(a) (stating second

- degree

- felony punishment range of 2 to 20 years ); Hammer v

. State , 4 6 1 S.W .3d 301, 30 3

– 0 4 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2015, no pet.) ( “ General ly,
pu nishment within the statutory limits is not excessive, cruel [,] or unusual

. ” ). Woods raised no objections at the punishment hearing or upon his sentence ’ s
p ronouncement
. In his motion for new trial, Woods argued only that “ [ t ] he ver dict is

con trary t o the law and evidence. There is new l y discovered evidence

. ” Woods complains on appeal that his sentence is grossly disproportionate to the
offense and there fore violates the Eight h Amendment prohibition on cruel and

unu sual punishment. Because Woods faile d to rais e this complaint in the trial court by

1 Woods had been ch arged with having killed Alfredo Luna by stabbing him with a knife in July 2016

.
2 The State alleged that Woods had violated his community supervision by using, possessing, or consuming alcohol , by comm itt ing a DWI, and by b eing unsuccessfully disch arged fro m th e SWIFT court program

.3 objecting to the length of his sentence following pronou nce ment or by asserting any
chall enge to it in his motion for new trial , he has failed to preser ve it for appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1 (a) ; Sample v. State , 4 05 S.W.3d 295, 303

– 04 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2013, pet. ref ’ d)

. We overrule Woods ’ s sole point and affirm the trial court ’ s judgm ent
.

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr Elizabeth Kerr Justice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47 .2( b)
Delivered : June 8, 2023
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50734

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jose Manuel Salazar-Hernandez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-173-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jose Manuel Salazar-Hernandez appeals his conviction and sentence 

for reentry after deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). SalazarHernandez argues that treating a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction 

that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b) as a sentencing factor, 

rather than a separate element of the offense, violates the Constitution. He 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 19, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50734 Document: 00516617465 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/19/2023
No. 22-50734

2

has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief 

explaining that he has raised the issue only to preserve it for further review 

and correctly conceding that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres 

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 

546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019).

Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., 

Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Salazar-Hernandez’s 

motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 22-50734 Document: 00516617465 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/19/2023
Derrick D. HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3127

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 19, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-12 (the "Exchange
    Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: GMAC
    Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Morgan
    Stanley Credit Corporation as Servicer and Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.
    as Servicer and as Sub-Servicer for Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
Michael Donell THOMAS Jr, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3299

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      Exhibit 12


                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                           MARCH 31, 2003
<S>                                                                      <C>
Income before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities .       $23,875
                                                                             -------

Fixed Charges:

Interest on debt .....................................................        45,294

Estimated interest portion of rents ..................................           787
                                                                             -------
Total fixed charges ..................................................        46,081
                                                                             -------

Adjusted Income ......................................................        69,956

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1) ...............................         1.52x
                                                                             =======
</TABLE>

      (1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing
income before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities and fixed
charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and
one-third rental expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
Consumer Safety Officer 

Description of Duties

Receives advanced training, through classroom and on-the job instruction, to provide a thorough 

understanding of and exposure to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) laws and regulations, 

administrative policies, and manufacturing and retail process. Plans and coordinates the 

execution of investigations and inspections. Provides guidance regarding inspections to 

accomplish compliance, enforcement and regulatory objectives. Prepares written reports and 

submits the reports to the supervisor for review and evaluation. Prepares final reports, position 

papers and other written documentation that supports investigative findings and 

recommendations. Actively participates in the implementation of new laws and regulations that 

impact the mission of the Center.

Qualifications

 A full course of study at an accredited college or university leading to a bachelor’s or 

higher degree, including 30 semester hours in one or a combination of biological 

sciences, chemistry, pharmacy, physical sciences, food technology, nutrition, medical 

science, engineering, epidemiology, veterinary medical science, or related scientific 

fields that provide knowledge directly related to consumer safety officer work. The 30 

semester hours can include up to 8 semester hours in statistics or course work that 

included the principles, theory or practical application of computers or computer 

programming OR a combination of education and experience that includes courses 

consisting of at least 30 semester hours in the fields of study described above, plus 

appropriate experience or additional education. A combination of education (coursework 

equivalent to a major) and experience may be considered.

 U.S. citizenship is required. 

Education

An official transcript, unofficial transcript, or a list including courses, grades earned, completion 

dates, and quarter and semester hours earned may be required. If you are using education 

completed in foreign colleges or universities to meet the qualification requirements, you must 

show that the education credentials have been evaluated by a private organization that specializes 

in interpretation of foreign education programs and such education has been deemed equivalent 

to that gained in an accredited U.S. education program; or full credit has been given for the 

courses at a U.S. accredited college or university. For further information, click on: foreign 

education.
Note: Please review each grade announcement for the specific qualifications and specialized 

experience.

Grade (Salary) Level

Federal General Schedule (GS) grade levels at which Consumer Safety Officers are commonly 

filled are:

 GS-09 through GS-13 ($54,972.00 to $123,234.00 / Per Year)

Geographic Location

Consumer Safety Officers are located at FDA Headquarters in Silver Spring, MD
|                       Name |   | State of Incorporation                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                     |   |                                               |
|         Hallmark Human Resources, Inc.. (100% owned)                                             |   |     Colorado                   |
|         PAS Services, Inc.* (100% owned)                                                         |   |     California                 |
|         Global Administrative Services, Inc.* (100% owned)                                       |   |        Alabama       |
|         Global Administrative Services II, Inc.* (100% owned)                                    |   |        Alabama  |
|          Global ASO, Inc. (100% owned)                                                           |   |        Alabama  |
Michael LOVE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10012.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Timothy J. MANKO, Appellant, v. Laurie A. MANKO, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3883

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 23, 2019

Timothy J. Manko, Deltona, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Timothy J. Manko appeals the trial court's order holding him in contempt and denying his motion to abate his support obligations owed to Laurie Manko. We affirm the trial court's order save for the award of attorney's fees. We are compelled to reverse the attorney's fees award because the trial court failed to make a determination as to need and ability to pay. *See* *Jones v. Jones*, 671 So.2d 852, 854-55 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (reiterating that trial court must consider need and ability to pay under section 61.16, Florida Statutes, *850in order to award attorney's fees in post-dissolution contempt proceedings); *see also* *Hardman v. Koslowski*, 107 So.3d 1246, 1248 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ("Because the contempt action arose in the context of a dissolution action, the trial court was required to determine need and ability to pay before imposing this monetary sanction." (citing § 61.16(2), Fla. Stat.)); *Worthington v. Harty*, 677 So.2d 1371, 1372 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) ("As chapter 61 is applicable, ability to pay and need must be considered by the court before ordering payment of attorney's fees in contempt proceedings incident to enforcing orders relating to support or custody." (citing *Armstrong v. Armstrong*, 623 So.2d 1216, 1218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) )).

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order, in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Affirmed, in part; Reversed, in part; and Remanded.

BERGER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Osteyopowoz

Kisa osteyopowoz la ye?

Osteyopowoz se yon maladi ki fe zo trè fèb 

epi kraze fasil.

Ki moun ki nan risk?

Nenpòt moun ka jwenn maladi osteyopowoz 

la, men fanm gen plis chans pou yo jwenn 

li pase gason. Ou ka gen plis chans pou ou 

jwenn li si ou:

• Gen plis pase 50 an

• Fimen

• Gen yon pwa kò ki ba

• Gen fanmi ki te gen osteyopowoz oswa zo 

kase

• Pa fè ase egzèsis

• Bwè alkòl (plis pase 3 bwason / jou)

• Pran sèten medikaman pou lontan tankou 

medikaman kriz malkadi oswa estewoyid

Kouman pou mwen 

konnen si mwen gen 

maladi osteyopowoz la?

Gen tès ki itilize swa radyografi oswa son pou 

mezire dansite zo. Tès sa yo san doulè. Mande 

doktè ou si ou ta dwe tèste.

• Tès radyografi, ki rele DXA, egzamine kolòn 

vètebral, anch, oswa ponyèt ou. DXA itilize 

trè kèk radyografi.

• Nouvo tès vag son, ki rele ultrason, teste 

talon w.

Kouman yo trete li?

Pa gen okenn jan pou geri maladi 

osteyopowoz la. Gen bagay ou ka fè pou 

ralanti li. Pale ak doktè ou pou fè yon plan 

pou kenbe zo ou an bon sante.

Biwo FDA nan Sante Fanm

www.fda.gov/womens
 Fèy enfòmasyon sa a te devlope pa Biwo FDA nan Sante Fanm.

Pou jwenn lot resous sou sante fanm yo, ale nan

www.fda.gov/womens

2021

Medikaman Sou 

Preskripsyon

Gen medikaman sou preskripsyon ke ou ka 

pran. Medikaman sa yo vini tankou yon grenn, 

yon plak, oswa yon piki (piki). Pale ak doktè 

ou, enfimyè ou, oswa famasyen ou anvan ou 

sispann pran medikaman ou.

Bisphosphonates se yon kalite dwòg komen 

yo bay pou ralanti pedi zo. Doktè ou ka ofri ou 

lòt dwòg.

• Pale ak doktè ou sou konbyen tan ou ta dwe 

pran medikaman sa yo.

• Di doktè ou si ou kòmanse gen efè segondè 

tankou nouvo doulè nan anch ou oswa kwis. 

Gen kèk moun ki pran medikaman sa yo ki 

te kraze zo kwis.

• Kèk nan medikaman sa yo ka irite gwòj ou.

• Pwoblèm grav nan zo machwè ou ka lakòz 

tou.

Sipleman Dyetetik

Sipleman dyetetik se pwodwi moun ajoute 

nan rejim yo. Gen ladan yo vitamin, poud, ba 

enèji, ak remèd fèy.

Pale ak doktè ou anvan ou pran nenpòt 

sipleman dyetetik. Sa ka afekte lòt 

medikaman ou yo epi fè ou malad.

Chanjman Nan Lavi Ou

Gen chanjman nan lavi ou ou ka fè pou 

diminye risk ou genyen maladi osteyopowoz 

la.

• Rete aktif fizikman. Fè egzèsis kenbe pwa 

tankou mache.

• Pafmi en.

• Limite itilizasyon alkòl.

• Pran ase kalsyòm ak vitamin D nan rejim ou. 

Doktè ou ka sijere pran grenn kalsyòm ak pil 

vitamin.

Osteyopowoz

Osteyopowoz (HAITIAN CREOLE)
Brenda Lee FORD, petitioner, v. Joe KEFFER, Warden.

No. 12-9969.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-8300, 333-76280, 333-76282, 333-103944,
333-103945 and 333-103946) of Centerpulse Ltd of our report dated March 10, 2003, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, relating to the financial statements of Centerpulse Ltd,
which are included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

|PricewaterhouseCoopers AG               |  |            
|--------------------------------------- |  | -----------
|/s/R. RAUSENBERGER                      |  | /s/ST. HAAG
|R. Rausenberger                         |  | St. Haag   
|Winterthur, Switzerland, April 17, 2003 |  |            

1

---

QuickLinks
Peter Demond KITT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1770

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.