alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 99-2072

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

JULIO QUINONES-MELENDEZ,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Salvador E. Casellas, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Torruella, Chief Judge,

Boudin and Lipez, Circuit Judges.

Norberto Colon on brief for appellant.

Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Jorge E. VegaPacheco, Assistant United States Attorney, and Nelson PerezSosa, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

July 13, 2000
Per Curiam. After a thorough review of the record

and of the parties’ submissions, we affirm. 

Because appellant Julio Quiñones Meléndez

(“Quiñones”) did not object below to the sentencing court’s

findings regarding drug quantity or his role in the offense,

those arguments are forfeited. See United States v. Bayes,

210 F.3d 64, 67 (1st Cir. 2000); Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b).

Even if they had not been forfeited, they are without merit.

Quiñones admitted under oath at the Rule 11 hearing that he

was guilty of the charge of conspiring to possess more than

five kilograms of cocaine, so we see no clear error in the

court’s decision to credit those sworn admissions. See

United States v. Marrero-Rivera, 124 F.3d 342, 354 (1st Cir.

1997). 

As for his role in the offense, this court would

only review for clear error, and we see none. See United

States v. Ortiz-Santiago, 211 F.3d 146, 148-49 (1st Cir.

2000). Quiñones agreed that the adjustment for a “minor”

role under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) should apply; and because the

government agreed to understate the quantity of drugs for

which Quiñones was to be held responsible, the sentencing

court was entitled to deny him a more generous role in the

offense adjustment. Id. at 149.
-3-

Quiñones also complains that he has not been

assigned to serve his sentence in a rehabilitation camp,

despite the recommendation of the sentencing court. But the

authority to assign prisoners to particular facilities lies

solely with the Bureau of Prisons. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621.

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanton
C. Heintz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



| | /s/
      Stanton C. Heintz                 
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Stanton C. Heintz                           
| | Chief Financial Officer                     
| | (principal financial and accounting officer)
| | June 15, 2009                               

---
1

2

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

l0

11

12

13

14

l5

t6

t7

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ALEX G. TSE (CABN 1s2348)

United States dttorney

THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 430s-O78T)

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Tax Division

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

S an Francisco, Californ ia 9 41 02-3 49 5

Telephone: (415) 436-7 017

FAX: (4ts) 436-7009

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. CV 17-00040 BLF

Petitioner,

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

STIPULATION TO DISMISS

AND I'PROPOSED] ORDER

JOSE HERNANDEZ,

Respondent.

For the reason that Respondent has produced all the records in his possession or control as

required by the surtmonses at issue, it is hereby stipulated between Petitioner, United States of America,

and Respondent, Jose Hernandez, that this matter be dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear

their own costs and attorney's fees.

ALEX G. TSE

United States Attomey

rt-L3-[g lu

JOSE HERNANEZ, DDS

Assistant United Attomey

Chiel Tax Division

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: 1RYHPEHU
T. F., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Ariel VEGUILLA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1275

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 05, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Certiorari is denied.
Robert J. MARSHALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9879.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc. as managing member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC, certify that (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 of
TriView Global Fund, LLC fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
TriView Global Fund, LLC.

TRIVIEW GLOBAL FUND, LLC

By:	TriView Capital Management, Inc., Managing Member

By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:	August 15, 2011

<page>
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Lukas Braunschweiler, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Dionex Corporation, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. Dionex Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007,and to which this Certification is attached (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.     By:
f8k011908ex10ii_mmg.htm


     

     

    Exhibit
10.2

    
      


      


      


      CONVERSION
AGREEMENT

      


      This
Conversion Agreement
(the “Agreement”), dated as
of January 19, 2009, is made and entered into by and between Mega Media Group,
Inc. (the “Company”), and FD
Imports Export Corp (the “Holder”).

      


      RECITALS

      


      WHEREAS, the Holder holds a 9%
promissory notes with an outstanding principal amount of $128,487.67 and
interest amount of $13,279.75(the “Note”), dated
February 28, 2008 and March 10, 2008, for a total of $141,767.42 which has been
assumed by the Company; and

      


      WHEREAS, the Holder has agreed
to convert the Note, including accrued interest thereon, into shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), on
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

      


      NOW, THEREFORE, intending to
be legally bound, the parties hereby agree as follows:

      


      
        	
                1.  

              	
                Conversion. The Holder
      shall convert the outstanding principal due under the Note, together with
      any interest accrued thereon through the date of conversion, into shares
      of the Company's Common Stock, at the rate of $0.01 per share (the “Conversion”)
      for a total of 14,767,742 shares. The Conversion shall be considered
      payment in full by the Company of the Note and the conversion method in
      the Note shall be waived. The Holder shall deliver the Note to the Company
      for cancellation.

              


      

      


      
        	
                2.  

              	
                Binding Effect. This
      instrument is being executed by the Holder and shall be binding upon its
      successors and assigns for the uses and purposes above set forth and
      referred to, and shall be effective as of the date
  hereof.

              


      

      


      
        	
                3.  

              	
                Governing Law. This
      instrument shall be governed by and enforced in accordance with the laws
      of the State of New York without any application of the principles of
      conflicts of laws.

              


      

      


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          -1-

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


       

      


      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Agreement has been duly executed by the Company and Holder as of the date first
above written.

      


      MEGA
MEDIA GROUP, INC.

       

      /s/ Alex
Shvarts                   


                                                                                                                                 
    Alex Shvarts, CEO

      


       

      THE
HOLDER

       

      /s/ Steven
Fruman                 

       BY:
Steven Fruman, VP

       FD
Import Export Corp.

       

       

       

       

      -2-
Exhibit 59

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-60 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of California

RIOT GAMES, INC.,

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-00331

Plaintiff(s)

v.

SHANGHAI MOBAI COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY 

CO., LTD., FAN QIANG, QIONGYU QU, CHAO LI, 

XIN ZHU, CHEN XU, XING WU, YIFEI JIANG, 

YINGFEI WU, and JIETING LI, and DOES 1-10, 

inclusive,

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

Shanghai Mobai Computer Technology Co., Ltd.

Building 7 Block B, Room 1100

Chenxiang Road 768, Jiading District

Shanghai 200090

China

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you 

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, 

whose name and address are:

Marc E. Mayer (SBN 190969)

Daniel A. Kohler (SBN 285501)

Matthew S. Beasley (SBN 288070)

Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP

11377 W. Olympic Boulevard

Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683

Telephone: 310-312-2000

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 5:17-cv-00331 Document 2 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Discover Financial Services LLC

Discover Card Master Trust I

The
undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Discover Financial Services LLC (DFS), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated January 1, 2007 by and between DFS and Discover Bank (the Agreement)
hereby certifies that:



|(a) | A review of the activities of DFS during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 and of its performance under the Agreement was made under my supervision.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, DFS has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2007.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 13th day of February
2008.



By:

/s/ Roger HochschildRoger Hochschild, President and Chief Operating
Officer
EXHIBIT F 

   

Case 4:16-cv-07013-HSG Document 108-6 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 11
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty L.P. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2007**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|              |   |   |
|-------------------|--------|--------|
| February 29, 2008 |   |   | /s/ Joseph Macnow |
|              |   | Name:  | Joseph Macnow |
|              |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer of Vornado Realty Trustsole general partner of Vornado Realty L.P. |
|                   |        |        |  |  |
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Andrew Grieve, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Fsona Systems Corp.
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Fsona Systems Corp.

Dated: November 19, 2007

/s/ Andrew Grieve Andrew GrievePresident, Secretary and
Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fsona Systems
Corp. and will be retained by Fsona Systems Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION DEADLINES

Case Nos. 3:17-cv-00123-JST/17-CV-03850-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO

JON VALLIERE, EILEEN FOSTER, ANTONIO 

GARCIA, and SAMANTHA WEST, individually 

and on behalf of all similarly situated current and 

former employees,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING 

COMPANY LLC, TESORO LOGISTICS GP, LLC, 

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 

Defendants.

JINETRA BONNER, individually, on behalf herself 

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TESORO REFINING & MARKETING 

COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 

Company; and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00123-JST

Assigned to the Hon. Jon S. Tigar

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION 

TO EXTEND CLASS CERTIFICATION 

MOTION DEADLINES

Case No. 17-CV-03850-JST
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND 

CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION DEADLINES

Case Nos. 3:17-cv-00123-JST/17-CV-03850-JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Class Certification Motion 

Deadlines, and finding good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS that: 

1. Plaintiffs shall file their motion for class certification by September 24, 2018;

2. Defendants shall file their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion by October 22, 2018; 

3. Plaintiffs shall file their reply by November 12, 2018; and

4. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification shall be continued to December 6, 

2018, at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __________________________________________

Jon S. Tigar, United States District Judge

April 30, 2018
Henry County Plywood Corporation: Exhibit 10.17 - Prepared by TNT
Filings Inc.




  


Exhibit 10.17





(English
Translation)


TRANSFER
AGREEMENT OF PATENT APPLICATION RIGHT


Party A: Xiong LUO and Yaoming FANG


Address: 6th Floor, Guang Lv Mansion,
No.947, Qiaoxing Road, Fanyu District, Guangzhou


Party B: Guangzhou Organic Region Agriculture Ltd.


Address: No.1, Lane No.1, Changtan Cun, Shiji County,
Fanyu District, Guangzhou


Based on the voluntary principle, Party A hereby
transfers to Party B the patent application right to the invention with the
name of Method and Equipment for Cleaning, Sterilizing and Retaining Freshness
of the Fruits and Vegetables (Patent Application Number: CN200510088865).


Article
1          The Parties agree
that the transfer price for the abovementioned patent application right is
_____0______, and shall be paid to Party A by Party B within three days
after this agreement takes effective.


Article
2          After the transfer
of the abovementioned patent application right, Party B will be responsible for
maintaining the effectiveness of the patent, such as pay for the certificate
fee, annual fee for the patent.


Article
3          Any rights to the
improvement to the patent thereafter shall belong to Party B.


Article
4          Party A shall
deliver to Party B the original receipt of the patent application.


Article
5          This agreement
shall be made in three copies, each party holding one copy.


After the execution of this agreement, Party B will,
at its own costs, submit one copy of this agreement to the State Intellectual
Property Office for the purpose of transferring the patent application right.


	
 

	
 


	
Party A:

	
 


	
 

	
 


	 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
Party B:

	
 





 	
 

	
 


	 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
(Company Seal)
CAMERON M., petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 12-1203.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK>  0000710182
<NAME>  TXU ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       15,217
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        618
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             395
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            73
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   1,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,992
<COMMON>                                         3,066
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          (10)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              3,602
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   6,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              850
<PREFERRED>                                        115
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             4,655
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 311
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      457
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   4,946
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   17,992
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,351
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                66
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,031
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,089
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            262
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  (2)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     252
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           105
<NET-INCOME>                                       147
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          2
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      145
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           91
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             419
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

p1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145667

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145667

COA: 303837

Oakland CC: 2010-234338-FC

ALEX JEROME PERRY, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.