alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAFAEL SALAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

FORKNER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00663-JST 

ORDER REOPENING CASE

On April 1, 2019, the Court administratively closed this case for settlement purposes. ECF 

No. 51 at 38. The case did not settle, and the Court has entered a new scheduling order for further 

proceedings. ECF Nos. 57, 66. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall reopen the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 1, 2020

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 4:17-cv-00663-JST Document 84 Filed 05/01/20 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDY SIMENTAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY ADAMS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00801-SI 

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Interest has been expressed in conducting a settlement 

conference utilizing the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law Prison Civil Rights 

Mediation Clinic, which participates in some settlement conferences in the Sacramento Division 

of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The court has determined that this 

case will benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to Magistrate 

Judge Craig M. Kellison to conduct a settlement conference at the U. S. District Court, 501 I 

Street, Sacramento, California 95814 in Courtroom #4 at 1:00 p.m. on November 9, 2017.

A separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum will issue concurrently with 

this order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison

on November 9, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. at the U. S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, 

California 95814 in Courtroom #4.

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding 

settlement on the defendants’ behalf must attend in person.
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. 

The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in 

person may result in the imposition of sanctions and may result in the settlement 

conference being rescheduled to another date.

4. Magistrate Judge Kellison or another representative from the court will be contacting 

the parties either by telephone or in person, approximately two weeks prior to the 

settlement conference, to ascertain each party’s expectations of the settlement 

conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2017

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPO[P [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 12613-008/00667916_1 Error! Unknown document property name. STIPULATION RE (1) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2) SCHEDULE FOR 

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Case No17cv00755

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, 

GABRIELA PERDOMO ORTIZ, and VICTOR 

HUGO CATALAN MOLINA, individually and 

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

 

PLAINTIFFS,

vs.

LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-

50,

DEFENDANTS.

Case No. 4:17-cv-00755

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING

STIPULATION FOR (1) FILING THE 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

AND (2) AMENDING THE SCHEDULE 

FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken

Pursuant to the agreement of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court orders the 

following schedule: 

1. Plaintiffs shall file their Second Amended Complaint in the form sent to Defendant on May 

26, 2017, by June 9, 2017; 

2. Defendant shall file its Motion to Compel Arbitration by July 10, 2017; 

3. Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration by August 

24, 2017; 

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 25 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE (1) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (2) SCHEDULE FOR MOTION 

TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Case No. 17-cv-00755

4. Defendant shall file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Compel Arbitration by September 

7, 2017; and

5. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration shall be heard on ______________________.

6. All other deadlines shall remain the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _____________

 The Honorable Claudia Wilken

United States District Judge

October 3, 2017 at 2:30pm June 5, 2017

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 25 Filed 06/05/17 Page 2 of 2
Antonio R. HALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9966.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMO LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

OTTOMOTTO LLC; and OTTO

TRUCKING LLC,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00939 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO 

HAC VICE APPLICATION

The pro hac vice application of Attorney William Carmody (Dkt. No. 1182) is DENIED

for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that “he or

she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest

court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). 

Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it identifies only the

state of bar membership — e.g., “the bar of New York” — is inadequate under the rule because

it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the

application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 14, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00939-WHA Document 1189 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2

 

Sarbanes - Oxley Section 302 Certification

 
| I, James J. Judge, certify that: |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |
| 1.                     | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BEC Funding II, LLC (the Registrant) and other reports containing distribution information for the period covered by the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
| 2.                     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3.                     | Based on my knowledge, the financial information required to be provided to the trustee under the governing documents of the issuer is included in these reports; and |
| 4.                     | Based on my knowledge, Boston Edison Company, the Servicer, has complied with its servicing obligations and minimum servicing standards. |
|  

                    |   |

 
|                                                                                                                                                          |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 2, 2005                       |   By:   | /s/ JAMES J. JUDGE                       |
|                                                                                                                                                          |                        | James J. Judge                                                                                                                                         |
|                                                                                                                                                          |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |   | Senior Vice President, Treasurer |
|                                                                                                                                                          |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |   | and Chief Financial Officer |
Case No.: 5:17-cv-00694-EJD

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CORINNA DAVIDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED HEALTHCARE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00694-EJD 

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Pursuant to ADR Local Rule 7-2, the above-entitled case is referred to Magistrate Judge 

Nathanael M. Cousins for a settlement conference to occur no later than December 1, 2017. The 

parties shall contact Judge Cousins’s Courtroom Deputy to arrange a date and time for the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 18, 2017

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 106 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 106

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the brave men and women in local law enforcement work tirelessly to 
        protect the communities they serve;
Whereas local law enforcement officers are tasked with upholding the rule of law 
        and ensuring public safety;
Whereas local law enforcement officers selflessly put themselves in harm's way 
        to fight crime, get drugs off the streets, and protect the innocent;
Whereas defunding police narratives vilify and demonize local law enforcement 
        officers and put them at greater risk of danger;
Whereas local law enforcement officers take an oath to never betray the public 
        trust;
Whereas the local law enforcement community protects our streets, acknowledges 
        the rights of all Americans, and keeps citizens safe from harm;
Whereas local law enforcement officers are recognized for their public service 
        to all, knowing they face extremely dangerous situations while carrying 
        out their duties;
Whereas a healthy and collaborative relationship between local law enforcement 
        officers and the communities they serve is essential to creating 
        mutually respectful dialogue; and
Whereas local law enforcement officers deserve respect and profound gratitude: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes and appreciates the dedication and devotion 
        demonstrated by the men and women of local law enforcement who 
        keep the Nation's communities safe;
            (2) extends its gratitude to all local law enforcement 
        officers and their families for their sacrifice and service; 
        and
            (3) condemns calls to defund, disband, dismantle, or 
        abolish the police.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 106

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Expressing support for local law enforcement officers and condemning 
           efforts to defund local law enforcement agencies.
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 122 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

Eastern Municipal Water District Recycled Water System Pressurization 

and Expansion Project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Mr. CALVERT, and Mrs. BONO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Eastern Municipal 

Water District Recycled Water System Pressurization 

and Expansion Project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eastern Municipal 

5 Water District Recycled Water System Pressurization and 

6 Expansion Project’’. 
2 

•HR 122 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102– 

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

5 adding after section 1636 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 1637. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECY7 CLED WATER SYSTEM PRESSURIZATION AND 

8 EXPANSION PROJECT, CALIFORNIA. 

9 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera10 tion with the Eastern Municipal Water District, Cali11 fornia, may participate in the design, planning, and con12 struction of permanent facilities needed to establish oper13 ational pressure zones that will be used to provide recycled 

14 water in the district. 

15 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

16 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

17 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

18 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

19 shall not be used for operation or maintenance of the 

20 project described in subsection (a). 

21 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

22 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

23 $12,000,000.’’. 

24 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

25 in section 2 of Public Law 102–575 is amended by insert26 ing after the item relating to section 1634 the following: 
3 

•HR 122 IH 

‘‘1637. Eastern Municipal Water District Recycled Water System Pressurization and Expansion Project, California.’’. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 100 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 100

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2882, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following correction:
     Amend the title so as to read: ``Making further consolidated 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for 
other purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 22, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 100

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 2882.
```
EXHIBIT
32.2














CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


OF PIONEER SOUTHWEST ENERGY
PARTNERS L.P.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §
1350








I, Richard P. Dealy, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Natural Resources GP LLC, the
general partner of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P. (the "Partnership"),
hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report")
by the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of that
section.





I further certify that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership.











/s/
      Richard P. DealyName:
            Richard
      P. Dealy, Executive VicePresident
      and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            February
      26, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         I,  Steven F.  Schepman,  Senior  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
Officer of First Banks, Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)   The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of the  Company  for  the
               quarterly  period  ended  March  31,  2006 (the  "Report")  fully
               complies with the  requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Date:  May 12, 2006

                                           By: /s/ Steven F. Schepman
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   Steven F. Schepman
                                                   Senior Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial and
                                                   Accounting Officer)
#### Willie HINES, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, and David D. Smith; Kedric Lamar Whitmore, Plaintiffs, v. Jon E. OZMINT, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-6058.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2004.

Decided May 18, 2004.

Willie Hines, Jr., Appellant pro se. Steven Michael Pruitt, McDonald, Patrick, Tinsley, Baggett & Poston, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Willie Hines, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order determining that his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, which he filed with three other inmates, was not appropriate for class certification and severing the action into four separate lawsuits. He also seeks to appeal a subse*903quent scheduling order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Hines seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Novelis Inc. (the Company),hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.              /s/ William T. Monahan   William T. Monahan   Interim Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sabine Royalty Trust (the Trust) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual
capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



SOUTHWEST BANK, TRUSTEE FOR SABINE ROYALTY
TRUSTBy: /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper
SVP, Royalty Trust Management


Date: November 6, 2015

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sabine Royalty Trust and will be retained by Sabine Royalty
Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Virginia BADEN, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. M. Lewis HALL, III, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1640

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.