alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      Exhibit 12


                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                MARCH 31, 2004
<S>                                                           <C>
Income before income taxes..................................       $ 30,977
                                                                   --------

FIXED CHARGES:

Interest on debt............................................         38,464
Estimated interest portion of rents.........................            718
                                                                   --------
Total fixed charges.........................................         39,182
                                                                   --------
Adjusted income.............................................         70,159

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1).......................          1.79x
                                                                   ========
</TABLE>

(1) The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
    before income taxes and fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges
    consist of interest on debt and one-third rental expense as representative
    of interest portion of rentals.
Salut put Korason 

Buente pine’lo’lo’-mu na maninafefetka i lalåhi ha’ nu chetnot 

korason. Ti dinanche este. Chetnot 

korason i mås sesso na pipino’ 

para famalao’an. 

I FDA guaha abiso-ña put taimanu 

siña mandiside hao maolek put i 

korason-mut.

FDA Office of Women’s Health

www.fda.gov/womenshearthealth 

I Fatko Siha put 

Aspirin. 

I umu’usa aspirin kada diha para u chomma’ 

åtakan korason pat stroke ti maolek para 

todu. 

• Faisen i mediku-mu kao dinanche aspirin para 

• Anggen dinanche’ aspirin para hågu, ketungo’:

 -Kuanto debi di un chule’. 

 -Kao sesso debi di un chule’. 

 - Kuåntos tiempo debi di un chuchule’. 

• Sangåni i mediku-mu put todu i amot yan 

Tungo’ i siñat siha 

un åtakan korason. 

I siñat siha un åtakan korason difirentes para 

famalao’an yan lalåhi.

• Makkat piniti gi pecho-mu pat entre i apåga gi 

• Atdet piniti gi ha’of-mu

• Giniha

• Gotpe bayok

• Yinayas sin ineksplika

• Binalåchu pat chathågu

• Piniti gi tiyån-mu
Salut put Korason 

Este na dokumento prinipåra as FDA Office of Women’s Health. 

Para un tungo’ mås put salut famalao’an hånao para este FDA website:

www.fda.gov/womenshearthealth

Maneha i Estao i 

Korason-mu Siha.

Sesso prubleman salut taiguihi takhilo’ na haga’, dinabetes yan takhilo’ 

na cholestoral siña muna’latakhilo’ 

i piligro-mu para chetnot korason. 

• Chule’ i amot-mu komo madirihi. 

• Anggen dinabetes hao chek i asukat gi 

• Na’machek i minengmong haga’-mu 

• Faisen i mediku-mu taimanu siña un 

• Guaha famalao’an mannisisita makina 

2021

Dinet ni’ Maolek para i Korason-mu.

I infotmasion gi un dikike’ na tapbleru 

para nengkånno’ siña umayuda hao 

manayek maolek para i na’-mu siha. 

• Ayek nengkånno’ ni’ ‘didie’ asiga’ 

• Ribåha i na’-mu ni’ gaitransfat. 

• Na’menggua i asukat gi na’-mu 

SALUT KORASON (CHAMORRO)
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned have executed this certification in connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the period ending June 30, 2008.  The undersigned hereby
certify that to our knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   October
28,
2008                          /s/Fred
Zolla


Fred
Zolla


President
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)








Dated:   October
28,
2008                         
/s/Craig
Stout


Craig
Stout


Chief
Operating Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Pond Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael C. Litt, as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael C. Litt                  
|Michael C. Litt                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date: July 20, 2009
Exhibit 10.18


 


FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”)
is made and entered into by and between Cano Petroleum, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices in Fort Worth, Texas
(the “Company”), and Michael J. Ricketts,
an individual currently residing in Tarrant County, Texas (“Vice President”),
effective as of the 31st day of December, 2008 (the “Amendment
Effective Date”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Vice President entered into that
certain Employment Agreement dated May 28, 2004, but effective June 1,
2004, as amended by the First Amendment to Employment Agreement effective January 1,
2006; Second Amendment to Employment Agreement effective June 1, 2006;
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement effective June 29, 2007; and
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement effective May 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Vice President desire to amend,
alter, modify, and change the provisions of the Agreement to bring the
provisions into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
benefits to be obtained hereunder and other good and valuation consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and confessed, the
Company and Vice President do hereby agree to amend, alter, modify and change
the Agreement, as of the Amendment Effective Date as follows:


 


1.                                      Section 12
of the Agreement is hereby adding the following new sentence at the end of the
first paragraph of said Section:


 


Subject
to Section 18 below, all payments made pursuant to this Section 12
shall be paid in a single lump sum within ten (10) days following Vice
President’s termination of employment, and any provision of in-kind benefits
hereunder shall not affect the in-kind benefits provided in any other taxable
year.


 


Except as specifically
amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect as originally
written.


 


Signatures


 


To
evidence the binding effect of the covenants and agreements described above,
the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first
written above.


 


	
   

  	
  THE
  COMPANY:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  CANO
  PETROLEUM, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
        /s/
  S. Jeffrey Johnson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  S.
  Jeffrey Johnson, Chairman and CEO

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  VICE
  PRESIDENT:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
        /s/
  Michael J. Ricketts

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Michael
  J. Ricketts
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 03, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 03, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0178. RYAN ALEXANDER DUKE v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 22CR113
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISON

DANTE C. COLLINS,

Petitioner,

v.

PAUL HAINLINE,

Respondent.

Case No. 17-cv-0099-NJV (PR) 

ORDER REOPENING AND 

TRANSFERRING CASE

This pro se habeas action was dismissed without prejudice due to the failure to pay the 

requisite $ 5.00 filing fee or, instead, submit a complete in forma pauperis application. Petitioner 

has now paid the filing fee. The Order of Dismissal (Docket No. 5) is VACATED and this case is 

REOPENED and the court will screen the case.

Petitioner challenges a conviction obtained in the Solano County Superior Court and 

argues that his custody credits were improperly calculated. Solano County is in the venue of the 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Petitioner is also incarcerated in 

the Eastern District of California. 

Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district of 

conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); this district is neither. The district of confinement is the 

preferable forum to review the execution of a sentence. Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. 

Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Because petitioner is housed and was convicted in 

the Eastern District, this petition is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the 

Case 1:17-cv-00099-NJV Document 8 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2017

________________________

NANDOR J. VADAS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:17-cv-00099-NJV Document 8 Filed 03/29/17 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ron Hooper, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sabine Royalty Trust,for which Southwest Bank acts as Trustee; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and proceduresto be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 9, 2016
### THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

In the Matter of Francis M . Deslauriers, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2017-002562

Opinion No. 27788 Subm itted March 7, 2018 – Filed April 4, 2018

PUBLIC REPRIMAND

John S. Nichols, Disciplinary Counsel, of Columbia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Francis M. Deslauriers, of Memphis, Tennessee, pro se

PER CURIAM: By order of the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee da ted April 20, 2017, respondent was censured for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct. 1 The order was forwarded to this Court by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) on December 1 9, 2017. Thereafter, pursuant to Rule 29( b) of the Rules for Lawyer Disc iplinary Enforcement, Rule 413, SCACR, OD C and respondent were notified by letter of the Clerk of this Court that the y had thirty days to inform the Court of any claim

1 The order states that in A ugust 2012, respondent was retained to represent a client in a lawsuit against an insurance company for a property damage claim, but filed nothing in the case and did not communicate with his client despite the client's numerous r equests for updates. Eventually, respondent filed a complaint i n January 2015; however, in March 2016, after another year of taking no action and failing to communicate with his client, re spondent informed his client that he had failed to serve the defendants or take their depositions , resulting in his client's case being dismissed. The order concluded r espondent violated Rules 1.1 ( competence), 1.3 (diligence), 1.4 (communication), 3.2 (expediting litigation), and 8.4 (miscondu ct) of the Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct. Respondent was publicly censured for the violations.that imposition of the identical discipline in South Carolina is not warranted and the reasons for any such claim. 2 Respondent did not respond to the Clerk's letter.

We find a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction to impos e as reciprocal discipline, as none of the reasons set forth in Rule 29(d) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement for the imposition of different discipline exists in this
matter.

PUBLIC REPRIMAND.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTRED GE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.

2 This letter was mailed to the m ost recent address respondent p rovided in the Attorney Information System (AIS).
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------


     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Textron Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen A. Giliotti, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Stephen A. Giliotti
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Stephen A. Giliotti
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                        Date: May 6, 2003


                                       26
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Mobley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Paul W. Mobley
                                       Chief Executive Officer of
                                       Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                       November 7, 2002
## 1995 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

1-23-1995 

# U S A v Z ehrb a ch

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 93-7477

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1995

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1995 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v Z e hr

b a ch " (1995). 1995 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 21. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1995/21

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ Nos. 93-7477 and 93-7493

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. DARUS H. ZEHRBACH, Appellant in No. 93-7477
. ALEX A. MERVIS, Appellant in No. 93-7493
.

___________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. Criminal Nos. 92-00218-01 and 02)

___________ ARGUED OCTOBER 28, 1993 BEFORE: ROTH, LEWIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges
. REARGUED IN BANC OCTOBER 17, 1994 BEFORE: SLOVITER, Chief Judge , BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE and GARTH Circuit Judges
.

___________ ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

__________

## IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Slip Opinion filed in

this case on January 23, 1995, be amended as follows: The dissent by Judge Lewis is amended to show that Judges Mansmann, Nygaard and McKee join in that dissent.
BY THE COURT

Timothy K. Lewis /s/ Circuit Judge

Dated: January 23, 1995
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 21

- 00539

- CV
JAMES CLIFFORD WALKER , Appellant

V.
FREDERICK LUNENB U RG AND MELODY LUNENB U RG , Appellee s Appeal from the 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County. (Tr. Ct. No. 102095

- CV ). This case is an appeal from the trial court’s August 19, 2021 order. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s order cont ains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s order.

The Court orders that the appellant, James Clifford Walker, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.
Judgment render ed October 31, 2023

. Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss. Opinion delivered by Justice Hightower.