alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

USA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KARL JAMES STEHLIN, 

Defendant.

CASE NO. 17-cr-00023-YGR

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; CONTINUING 

SENTENCING HEARING

The Court is in receipt of defendant Karl Stehlin’s sentencing memorandum and 

attachments, totaling 111 pages, filed after the close of business on Tuesday, August 14, 2018 for 

a sentencing set for Thursday, August 16, 2018. (Dkt. Nos. 61, 61-1, 61-2.) 

Accordingly, counsel for defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why she should not be 

sanctioned in the amount of $200.00 for failure to comply with Criminal Local Rule 32-5(b), 

which requires that “[a]ny sentencing memorandum shall be filed no later than 7 days prior to the 

date set for sentencing.” As a consequence of counsel’s actions, the Court, opposing counsel, and 

Probation are left with inadequate time to prepare. Further, the Court understands that Probation 

is not available for the last two weeks of August. 

A hearing on this Order to Show Cause shall be held on Thursday, September 6, 2018 on 

the Court’s 3:31 p.m. calendar in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 

in Courtroom 1. Defense counsel must file a written response to this Order to Show Cause no 

later than August 30, 2018 explaining her failure to comply with the above rule. No waiver of 

appearance will be permitted. 

\\ 

\\ 

\\ 
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

In light of the foregoing, the sentencing is CONTINUED to Thursday, September 6, 2018

at 3:30 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 15, 2018 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HOWARD HERSHIPS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, ET AL., 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 17-cv-00473-YGR 

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S LETTER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 44 

On May 3, 2017, plaintiff filed a three-page, single-spaced letter presenting additional 

argument and authorities in support of his opposition to defendants’ motions to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 

44.) Plaintiff previously filed an opposition to the same on April 11, 2017 (Dkt. No. 32), and 

defendants filed their replies on April 18, 2017 (Dkt. Nos. 39, 40). On April 24, 2017, the Court 

vacated the hearing on such motions, indicating that it would issue an order based on the parties’ 

submissions. (Dkt. No. 42.) Plaintiff’s filing on May 3, 2017 therefore is in contravention of the 

Local Rules, which provide thus: “Once a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers or 

letters may be filed without prior Court approval” except in two circumstances not at issue here. 

Civil L.R. 7-3(d). 

Ordinarily, plaintiff’s filing at Docket Number 44 would be stricken from the record and 

sanctions potentially would issue. Given the plaintiff’s pro se status, he is hereby warned that he 

must still comply with his obligations under the Local Rules of this District and this Court’s 

Standing Orders. Further failures to comply may result in sanctions. Plaintiff should have 

requested a reasonable continuance to comply with his obligations. 

Given the substantive nature of the letter, defendants may file a joint brief in response not 

to exceed six pages by May 19, 2017. No other filings on the issues presented will be allowed 

without Court authorization. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 5, 2017 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7078

DAVID WAYNE MIXON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VDOC , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Gerald Bruce Lee , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 01372

- GBL

- MSN )

Submitted : December 19, 2017 Decided: December 22, 2017

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. David Wayne Mixon, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Hyman Katz, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions a re not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Wayne Mixon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat e of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the meri ts, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mixon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appea l. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 789 

Designating October 12, 2022, as ‘‘National Loggers Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2022 

Mr. DURBIN for (Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. KING, and Mr. DAINES)) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 12, 2022, as ‘‘National Loggers Day’’. 

Whereas the logging industry has served as an economic driver and cultural tradition in the United States for centuries; 

Whereas the logging industry creates rural jobs and provides 

revenue for local and State governments and National 

Forests; 

Whereas loggers provide renewable material for products used 

by people in the United States every day; 

Whereas loggers are the first link in the $300,000,000,000 

domestic forest products supply chain; 

Whereas loggers are the means by which healthy forest management plans are accomplished; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 789 IS 

Whereas logging provides for healthy forests that maintain 

vital animal habitats; 

Whereas logging provides for healthy forests which— 

(1) protect watersheds; 

(2) sequester carbon; 

(3) provide public recreational opportunities; and 

(4) reduce loss of life and property from wildfires; 

and 

Whereas logging provides for healthy forests through regeneration, including planting 2,500,000,000 trees annually: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 12, 2022, as ‘‘National 

3 Loggers Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the President to officially des5 ignate October 12th as ‘‘National Loggers Day’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

 APPLICANT 

 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

g

Reset Form

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 3:17-CR-00073-J

MATSUO ELECTRIC CO., LTD.

Curtis E. Woods

Curtis E. Woods

Curtis E. Woods

the State of Missouri

Defendant Matsuo Electric Co., Ltd.

Bonnie Lau

4520 Main Street, Suite 1100

Kansas City, MO 64108

One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, 24th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94105

(816) 460-2425 (415) 882-5083

curtis.woods@dentons.com bonnie.lau@dentons.com

27065

03/06/17

3/15/17

ATES DISTRICT xxxxxxxxx

ation with, loca

Case 4:17-cr-00073-JD Document 7 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 1
Ruben Danyon MCCLOUD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2982

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 6, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated March 13, 2015, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual Report”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

Dated: March 6, 2019

 

 
|   | /s/ Samuel Pollock                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Samuel Pollock                              |
|   | CEO, Brookfield   Infrastructure Group L.P. |

 

----
4821-3398-8986.1 - 1 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING EXISTING DEADLINES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 

David Yeremian, CA Bar No. 226337

david@yeremianlaw.com

535 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 705 

Glendale, CA 91203

Telephone: 818.230.8380

Facsimile: 818.230.0308

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

JAMES CUNHA, and others similarly situated 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES CUNHA, an individual, on behalf of 

himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

INTELLICHECK, LLC, a California Limited 

Liability Company; CHICO PRODUCE, INC., 

d/b/a PROPACIFIC FRESH, INC., a 

California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 

100, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No.: 17-CV-00597-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING 

CURRENT DEADLINES AND SETTING 

DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR CLASS 

CERTIFICATION 

Complaint Filed: December 20, 2016

Sac Filed: June 26, 2017

Trial Date: None

District Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

Courtroom 9, San Francisco

Case 4:17-cv-00597-JST Document 152 Filed 11/26/18 Page 1 of 2
4821-3398-8986.1 - 2 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING EXISTING DEADLINES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO THE NOTICE OF THE PARTIES AND FOR GOOD CAUSE 

SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

All previously ordered dates in this action are vacated. Plaintiff is to file his motion for 

preliminary approval on or before January 31, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ ____________________________________ 

The Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

November 26, 2018

Case 4:17-cv-00597-JST Document 152 Filed 11/26/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 13.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.
(the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield
Asset Management Barbados Inc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the
Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the
information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Dated: June 30, 2008



/s/ John StinebaughJohn StinebaughCFO, Brookfield Infrastructure Group Corporation
Len PETTAWAY, Jr. v. STATE

CR-17-0240

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W. Mobley,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Paul W. Mobley
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                                Date:  August 9, 2006
# Službeni list C 358/2018

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 358 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 61.4. listopada 2018. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 358

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 61.4. listopada 2018.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | IV.   Obavijesti |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Europski parlamentVijeće |
| 2018/C 358/01 | Zajednička izjava Europskog parlamenta, Vijeća i Komisije o Uredbi (EU) 2018/1475 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o utvrđivanju pravnog okvira Europskih snaga solidarnosti i izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 1288/2013, Uredbe (EU) br. 1293/2013 i Odluke br. 1313/2013/EU | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

IV.   Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europski parlamentVijeće

2018/C 358/01

Zajednička izjava Europskog parlamenta, Vijeća i Komisije o Uredbi (EU) 2018/1475 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o utvrđivanju pravnog okvira Europskih snaga solidarnosti i izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 1288/2013, Uredbe (EU) br. 1293/2013 i Odluke br. 1313/2013/EU

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

IV. Obavijesti

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europski parlament Vijeće

| 4.10.2018 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | C 358/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2018

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

C 358/1

---

Zajednička izjava Europskog parlamenta, Vijeća i Komisije o Uredbi (EU) 2018/1475 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o utvrđivanju pravnog okvira Europskih snaga solidarnosti i izmjeni Uredbe (EU) br. 1288/2013, Uredbe (EU) br. 1293/2013 i Odluke br. 1313/2013/EU (1)

(2018/C 358/01)

Ne dovodeći u pitanje ovlasti proračunskog tijela, 80 % proračuna za provedbu Programa u 2019. i 2020. trebalo bi biti dostupno putem navedenih preraspodjela u okviru podnaslova 1.a (Konkurentnost za rast i radna mjesta) višegodišnjeg financijskog okvira (VFO) za razdoblje 2014. – 2020. te preraspodjela iz Mehanizma Unije za civilnu zaštitu i programa LIFE. Međutim, neće biti dodatnih preraspodjela u programu Erasmus+, osim iznosa od 231 800 000 EUR iz prijedloga Komisije (COM (2017)0262).

Za preostalih 20 % proračuna za provedbu Programa u 2019. i 2020. potrebno je iskoristiti raspoloživu razliku u okviru podnaslova 1.a VFO-a za razdoblje 2014. – 2020.

Postoji konsenzus oko toga da će Komisija na uravnotežen i razuman način osigurati dostupnost potrebnih odobrenih sredstava u okviru uobičajenog proračunskog postupka.

Izjava Komisije

Komisija potvrđuje da korištenje odobrenih sredstava za tehničku pomoć na inicijativu Komisije u okviru Uredbe o zajedničkim odredbama (posebno preraspodjela iz Europskog socijalnog fonda i Europskog poljoprivrednog fonda za ruralni razvoj) za financiranje Europskih snaga solidarnosti 2018. neće upotrijebiti kao presedan za prijedlog o Europskim snagama solidarnosti za razdoblje nakon 2020. (COM(2018)0440)).

---

(1)  SL L 250, 4.10.2018., str. 1.

---
Michael Q. BLACK, petitioner, v. Peter F. KILMARTIN, Attorney General of Rhode Island, et al.

No. 12-9244.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32.1


                         ELITE ARTZ, INC.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officers of Elite Artz Inc. (the "Company") certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)     the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
        ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



Date:   August 8, 2005             /s/ David Cartisano
                                   ____________________________________
                                   David Cartisano
                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                   /s/ Stephen Cartisano
Date:   August 8, 2005             _____________________________________
                                   Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LAVETTE FOSTER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

RASH, CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 4:17-cv-00684-YGR 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC 

APPEARANCE AT INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiff and defendant have each filed a request to appear telephonically at the first case 

management conference scheduled in this case, set for May 15, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. Dkt. Nos. 17 and 

18. Counsel base the requests on the inconvenience of traveling to the Oakland courthouse. 

The requests to appear by telephone are DENIED. Pursuant to the undersigned judge’s 

Standing Order in Civil Cases, telephonic appearances are allowed at initial case management 

conferences only upon a compelling showing of good cause. The routine inconveniences of travel do 

not constitute good cause. 

If the parties believe this action does not warrant the expense associated with their required 

presence, they may consider reassignment to any magistrate judge of their choice. Profiles can be 

found at: http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Magistrate judges in this district carry significant 

consent cases and are more flexible than the undersigned. Any joint request for reassignment to a 

magistrate should be filed no later than the Wednesday before the scheduled case management 
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

conference. 

This Order terminates Docket Nos. 17 and 18. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 8, 2107 _______________________________________

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of Liberty Silver Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Manish Z. Kshatriya, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Manish Z. Kshatriya
Chief Financial Officer  Date: September ­­28, 2015