alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2017104EN.01000301.xml

| 20.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/703

of 5 April 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Vitelloni Piemontesi della coscia (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Vitelloni Piemontesi della coscia’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Vitelloni Piemontesi della coscia’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Vitelloni Piemontesi della coscia’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Vitelloni Piemontesi della coscia’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Vitelloni Piemontesi della coscia’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 April 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 481, 23.12.2016, p. 21.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### Samwel Okoth OSEWE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Adele FASANO; et al., Respondents—Appellees.

No. 03-56051.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2004.*

Decided April 26, 2004.

*492Samwel Okoth Osewe, Santa Fe Springs, CA, pro se.

Sharia Cerra, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Samwel Okoth Osewe, a native and citizen of Kenya, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, we review de novo, *see Miles v. Prunty,*187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999) and we affirm.

Osewe contends that he is eligible for a waiver of removal under the former Immigration and Naturalization Act § 212(c). However, because the AEDPA abolished the INA § 212(c) waiver before removal proceedings were initiated against Osewe, he is not eligible for relief under that section. *See INS v. St. Cyr,*533 U.S. 289, 296-97, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001).

Osewe argues that the decision to exercise his right to a jury trial classifies him as an alien who remains eligible for § 212(c) relief despite the AEDPA. We are unpersuaded. *See id.*at 321-326 (holding that aliens who entered plea bargains in reliance on the availability of § 212(c) relief from removal remain eligible for that relief although § 212 had been abolished).

Finally, the district court did not err in dismissing Osewe’s attacks on his state court conviction. *See Contreras v. Schiltgen,*122 F.3d 30, 31-32 (9th Cir.1997) (stating that a petitioner may not collaterally attack his state court conviction in a habeas proceeding against the INS).

Osewe’s motion to supplement exhibits on motion for reconsideration is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1
   1.
    
    Dionex Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009,
and to which this Certification is attached (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.
 By:
    
    /s/ Frank WitneyName:
    
    Frank WitneyTitle:
    
    President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
    
    February 9, 2010
1

2

3

4''

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Coo~evLLP

Ar~rouN -:vs o A~~ Lnw

Pni.o Ai.To

COOLEY LLP

PATRICK E. GIBBS (SBN 183174) (pgibbs@cooley.com)

WENDY J. BRENNER (SBN 198608) (brennerwj@cooley.com)

ALLI S. DAVIDSON (SBN 267964) (adavidson@cooley.com)

MICHELLE TON (SBN 300942) (mton@cooley.com)

ADDISON LITTON (305374) (alitton@cooley.com)

3175 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, California 94304-1130

Telephone: (650) 843-5000

Facsimile: (650) 849-7400

Attorneys for Defendant,

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRIC"I' OF CALIFORNIA

SAN TItANCISCO DIVISION

LENZA H. MCELRATH III, Individually and

on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:16-cv-07241-JSC

ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES

AND COUNSEL

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline S. Corley

ADR CtiR1'IFICA"C[ON BY PAi2'fIES AND COUNSCL

(CAs~ No. 3:1G-cv-07241-JSC)

Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 21 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7''

8,

9

10

11

l2

13

I4

15

l6

17 ',

1~

19'

2Q

21

22

23

24

?~

26

27

?~

CC)Oi2'.Y L(.C~

R irtafi NY. t.4' A7 ~.Rw

I'it43 ALTO

'T~ "I'I-~~ ~~E~t, A.~,I.. P~I2TIES ~~dI~ t~I.,I., ~f9~J~~~i., OF ~~3I2D:

Pursuant to Civil L.R, 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), each of the undersigned certifies that he

or she has:

{1} Read the handbook entitled "Dispute Re~olutian Procedures in tl~e Northern Districk

c~FCalifornia" (available at ~and.uscourts.~ov/adr).

(2) Discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private

entities; and

{~) Considered whether this case ani~ht benefit fram any of the available dispute

resolution options.

~~—

Ida#ed: March 2, 2017 Signed: ~ ` ~-e~`"~a_,

Randall Hairn~vici

tJb~r Technologies, Inc.

Dated: March 2, 2017 Signed; /sl Patrick E. Gibbs

Patrick E. Gibbs (1X3174}

Conley LLp

3175 E-~anover Street

Palo Alto, Califamia 9304-1130

Telephor~e: {650} X43-SOQQ

facsimile: (650) 849-7400

p~ibbs~a caoley.corn

Attorr~eY.fr~r Uber Technologies, Inc.

~. fiY9ll ~~:it'1'lF1CATtON I3Y ~:~RT[F.S A~tI} C{7lIRiSEL

(CnsE iVo.3:iG-Gv-U724]-J5C}

Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 21 Filed 03/02/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2'

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

]5

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Cooi~ev LLP

(1 TTC11ZNkYS f~T L.AIV

Pni.o Ai.ro

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing

ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest

that the other signatories have concurred in this filing.

Dated: March 2, 2017 Cooley LLP

By: /s/ Patrick E. Gibbs _

Patrick E. Gibbs

3 ADR CTRTIFICATION BY PAR'I'IGS AND COUNSCL

(CasF No.3:16-cv-07241-JSC)

Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 21 Filed 03/02/17 Page 3 of 3
; AND ORDER

Case 4:05-cv-00123-PJH Document 49 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton

Case 4:05-cv-00123-PJH Document 49 Filed 04/20/06 Page 2 of 2
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Kennard Law, P.C. v. Linda Patton

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00305

- CV

Trial court case number: 15

- DCV

- 226125A

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend C ounty

O n May 18, 2022, appellee, Linda Patton, filed “ Appellee ’ s First Opposed Motion to

Dismiss and Motion for Damages & Sanctions. ” Also

, o n May 23, 2022, appellee filed

“ Appellee ’ s First Opposed Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Damages & Sanctions. ” The

motions are de nied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Countiss

__________ Acting individua lly

Date: June 1 4 , 2022
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 28, 2017

No. 04-17-00444-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.P.,

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-PA-00082

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is a parental termination case in which appellant filed a notice of appeal, asserting 

she is appealing an order rendered on or about June 8, 2017 that terminated her parental rights to 

her children. In the filing in this court, the notice of appeal did not contain a copy of the alleged 

order from which she contends she is appealing. On July 12, 2017, the Bexar County district 

clerk filed the clerk’s record, and it also does not contain a copy of a signed order terminating 

appellant’s parental rights. Rather, the clerk’s record contains a document titled “JUDGE’S 

NOTES;” on this document there is a handwritten entry as follows:

Orders: Term Granted

Janice Crawford: (d)(e) (N)(O)(P)

Eddie Patterson: (d)(e) (N)(O)(P)

Cedric [handwriting illegible]: (N)(O)

This court has specifically held that “[a] judge’s handwritten notes are for his or her own 

convenience and form no part of the record.” In re L.H., No. 04-13-00174-CV, 2013 WL 

3804584, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 17, 2013, no pet.) (citing In re A.W., 384 S.W.3d 

872, 873 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, no pet.)). In other words, judge’s notes do not 

constitute an appealable order. See id. Thus, it appears there is no judgment or order from 

which appellant may appeal. 

Accordingly, we order appellant to show cause in writing to this court on or before

August 7, 2017, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction based on the 

absence of an appealable order or judgment. We further order the appellate deadlines suspended 

until further order of this court. 
_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128722 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128722 

 COA: 253246 

Oakland CC: 03-188275-FH 

TAVARIOUS ARNELL BROWN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 14, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
BLACK POINT ASSETS, LLC, as trustee under the 1124 Rushmore Avenue South Land Trust dated March 1, 2015, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR WAMU MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-PR4 TRUST; B&B B&B Funding, LLC; Kim Mitchell a/k/a Kim M. Delpino a/k/a Kim D. Mitchell; Unknown Tenant(s) n/k/a Brian Wilson; Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-4493

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 833 

Designating September 24, 2022, through October 2, 2022, as ‘‘Blue Star 

Welcome Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2022 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. KAINE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 24, 2022, through October 2, 2022, 

as ‘‘Blue Star Welcome Week’’. 

Whereas Blue Star Families seeks to empower military families by connecting them with their neighbors, both individuals and organizations, to create vibrant communities 

of mutual support; 

Whereas Blue Star Families annually designates the week beginning the last Saturday in September and concluding 

9 days thereafter as ‘‘Blue Star Welcome Week’’; 

Whereas, during Blue Star Welcome Week, the Senate recognizes the 600,000 active duty and transitioning military 

families who move to new communities each year; 

Whereas nearly half of these permanent change of station 

moves occur during the summer; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 833 ATS 

Whereas only 29 percent of military family respondents to 

the 2022 Military Family Lifestyle Survey published by 

Blue Star Families reported that they feel a sense of belonging to their local civilian community; and 

Whereas a sense of belonging is essential to the well-being 

and readiness of military families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 24, 2022, through 

3 October 2, 2022, as ‘‘Blue Star Welcome Week’’; 

4 (2) expresses gratitude for the sacrifices made 

5 by service members, transitioning veterans, and their 

6 families; 

7 (3) commits to ensuring that military-connected 

8 families feel a strong sense of belonging to their 

9 local civilian communities; and 

10 (4) encourages civilians across the United 

11 States to welcome military-connected families into 

12 their communities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

May 6, 2004 

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc. 

 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-9293, 33-11154, 33-15271, 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-28505, 33-33344,33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-01459, 333-09867, 333-15179, 333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40677, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788,333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332, 333-101323, 333-102920, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550 and 333-114551; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and 333-63716) of SunMicrosystems, Inc. of our reports dated October 15, 2003, January 14, 2004, and April 14, 2004 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for thequarters ended September 28, 2003, December 28, 2003, and March 28, 2004. 

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Samuel BETANCOURT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1149

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10837]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Grand Canyon National Park; Colorado River Running Services

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is now ready to issue a concession 
prospectus to operate river running services for park visitors on the 
Colorado River within Grand Canyon National Park. Existing contracts 
are expiring. Sixteen separate contracts are to be awarded.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It is expected that within thirty (30) days 
the National Park Service will issue a Prospectus describing the terms 
and conditions that will apply to applicants for the above contracts. 
Parties interested in making such applications should contact Ms. 
Teresa Jackson, Division of the Concession Program Management, Western 
Regional Office, (415) 744-3981 (fax telephone number (414) 744-3951) 
to place themselves on the mailing list for the Prospectus.

    Dated: March 29, 1995.
Stanley T. Albright,
Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 95-10837 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Barbara D. GREENE and Barbara D. Greene, Trustee of the Larson Family Trust, Appellants, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**U.S. Bank Trust National Association**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank Trust National            Association (the "Trustee"), as Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust for BNSF            Funding Trust I Securities, Series 2007-2 (the "Trust"), does hereby certify            that:

 

| 1. | The Bank is Trustee under the Trust                            Agreement.                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant                            to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the                            Trust.                                                                                   |
| 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123                            of the Securities and Exchange Commission's                            Regulation AB.                                                                                               |
| 4. | A review of the Trustee's activities during the                            twelve-month period ended December 31, 2007 and of its performance                            under the Trust Agreement has been made under my                            supervision.       |
| 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the                            Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement                            in all material respects throughout such twelve-month                            period. |

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate            this 28th day of March 2008.

             

 

|   |                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  

                                                                                                                                                 |
| By:    | /s/ Janet                            O'Hara                    |
| Name:  | Janet O'Hara                                                                                                                                                  |
| Title: | Assistant Vice President                                                                                                                                      |

 

 

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 833 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 833

Designating September 24, 2022, through October 2, 2022, as ``Blue Star 
                            Welcome Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2022

     Mr. Burr (for himself and Mr. Kaine) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating September 24, 2022, through October 2, 2022, as ``Blue Star 
                            Welcome Week''.

Whereas Blue Star Families seeks to empower military families by connecting them 
        with their neighbors, both individuals and organizations, to create 
        vibrant communities of mutual support;
Whereas Blue Star Families annually designates the week beginning the last 
        Saturday in September and concluding 9 days thereafter as ``Blue Star 
        Welcome Week'';
Whereas, during Blue Star Welcome Week, the Senate recognizes the 600,000 active 
        duty and transitioning military families who move to new communities 
        each year;
Whereas nearly half of these permanent change of station moves occur during the 
        summer;
Whereas only 29 percent of military family respondents to the 2022 Military 
        Family Lifestyle Survey published by Blue Star Families reported that 
        they feel a sense of belonging to their local civilian community; and
Whereas a sense of belonging is essential to the well-being and readiness of 
        military families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 24, 2022, through October 2, 2022, 
        as ``Blue Star Welcome Week'';
            (2) expresses gratitude for the sacrifices made by service 
        members, transitioning veterans, and their families;
            (3) commits to ensuring that military-connected families 
        feel a strong sense of belonging to their local civilian 
        communities; and
            (4) encourages civilians across the United States to 
        welcome military-connected families into their communities.
                                 <all>
```