alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22 - 50734 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Jose Manuel Salazar -**  **Hernandez,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:22 - CR - 173 - 1

**_____ _________________________**  Before **Jones, Haynes,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges. **Per Curiam :**  ***** Jose Manuel Salazar - Hernandez appeals his conviction and sentence for reentry after deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Salazar Hernandez argues that treating a prior felony or aggravated felony conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b) as a sentencing factor, rather than a separate element of the offense, violates the Constitution. He

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 19, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50734 Document: 00516617465 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/19/2023No. 22 - 50734

2 has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief explaining that he has raised the issue only to preserve it for further review and correctly conceding that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez - Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553 - 54 (5th Cir. 2019). Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Salazar - Hernandez’s motion is **GRANTED** , and the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED** . Case: 22-50734 Document: 00516617465 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/19/2023
T.M., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1017

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
James Andrew FREEMAN, petitioner, v. Craig APKER, Warden.

No. 12-9946.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 51

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-52 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of MediaBay Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey Dittus, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to U.S.C. SS. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



                                                /s/ Jeffrey Dittus
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jeffrey Dittus
                                                Chief Executive Officer



Dated: March 31, 2006
Sean Patrick EMKE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2034

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL DEADLINE 

Case Nos. 3:17-cv-00123-JST/17-CV-03850-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

JON VALLIERE, EILEEN FOSTER, ANTONIO 

GARCIA, and SAMANTHA WEST, individually 

and on behalf of all similarly situated current and 

former employees, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING 

COMPANY LLC, TESORO LOGISTICS GP, LLC, 

and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 

 

 Defendants. 

JINETRA BONNER, individually, on behalf herself 

and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TESORO REFINING & MARKETING 

COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 

Company; and DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-00123-JST 

Assigned to the Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION 

TO FURTHER EXTEND MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL DEADLINE 

Case No. 17-CV-03850-JST 
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND 

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL DEADLINE 

Case Nos. 3:17-cv-00123-JST/17-CV-03850-JST 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Further Extend Motion for Preliminary 

Approval Deadline, and finding good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS that: 

1. The deadline to file a Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from 

Wednesday, April 24, 2019 to Wednesday, May 8, 2019; 

2. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval shall be continued from 

Thursday, May 30, 2019 to Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________ __________________________________________

 Jon S. Tigar, United States District Judge 

April 25, 2019
K.R., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-279

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Amendment dated February 4, 2009



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 

 
 February 4, 2009 
 John Dulchinos 
 Dear John, 
 Pursuant to the
January 28, 2009 approval by the Adept Board of Directors, the September 2, 2008 letter agreement between you and Adept Technology is amended to reflect a 20% reduction in base pay salary effective January 5, 2009. The reduction in
pay shall remain in force for calendar 2009 until a determination to revise your salary base is approved by the Board. 
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	
	/s/ Lisa M. Cummins
	 Lisa M. Cummins
 Vice President of Finance

and Chief Financial Officer


 I have read, understand, and accept the revision of my base salary. 
  

	
	
	/s/ John Dulchinos
	 John Dulchinos
 2/4/09
Case 3:05-cr-00305-WHA Document 12 Filed 08/24/05 Page 1 of 2
August 24, 2005

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

November 9, 2005

Case 3:05-cr-00305-WHA Document 12 Filed 08/24/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS   Document 18   Filed 05/09/17   Page 1 of 8

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS   Document 18   Filed 05/09/17   Page 2 of 8

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS   Document 18   Filed 05/09/17   Page 3 of 8

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS   Document 18   Filed 05/09/17   Page 4 of 8

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS   Document 18   Filed 05/09/17   Page 5 of 8

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS   Document 18   Filed 05/09/17   Page 6 of 8

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS   Document 18   Filed 05/09/17   Page 7 of 8

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS   Document 18   Filed 05/09/17   Page 8 of 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                       1,925,006
<SECURITIES>                                 2,188,510
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,150,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    405,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,662,343
<PP&E>                                       3,072,845
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,350,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,132,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,128,980
<BONDS>                                      1,673,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,123,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,132,551
<SALES>                                      2,644,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,121,964
<CGS>                                        1,201,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,506,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,237,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                406,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                   135,536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            271,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   271,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>
Jess J. MURPHY, Appellant, v. Shakyia Aloria SUMNER, Appellee.

No. 1D19-1665

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 16, 2019

Jess J. Murphy, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of Appellant's response to the Court's order of May 8, 2019, the Court has determined that the appeal is untimely. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Appellant's Motion for Civil Contempt and/or Return of Child(ren), filed May 6, 2019, is denied as moot.

Ray, C.J., and Bilbrey and Jay, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7810

JAMES HENRY TINSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR HARRIS, Attending Physician,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (2:05-cv-00730-JBF)

Submitted: May 16, 2007 Decided: June 4, 2007

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Henry Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa

Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Henry Tinsley appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Tinsley v. Harris, No. 2:05-cv-00730-JBF (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2006).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Re: FDA Office of Cosmetics & Colors

 COC 308006-6, 6A,6B/D58, Revised 10/11/2019 (Revision #2)

 Page 7 of 16

Chemistry from Chrysotile Structure pictured above

308006-6B, Chrysotile Structure 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32327]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Engineering Education and Centers--
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Engineering Education and 
Centers (173).
    Date/Time: January 18, 1995, 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Conference Room 365.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Sharon Middledorf and Mary Poats, Engineering 
Education and Centers Division, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Rm 585, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1384.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including examination of decisions on proposals, reviewer 
comments, and other privileged materials.
    Reason for Closing: The meeting is closed to the public because 
the Committee is reviewing proposal actions that will include 
privileged intellectual property and personal information that could 
harm individuals if they were discussed. If discussions were to open 
to the public, these matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act would be 
improperly disclosed.

    Dated: December 28, 1994.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, HRM.
[FR Doc. 94-32327 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 2, 2010 

0331 

Order 

 

April 2, 2010 

140545 & (17) 

RODNEY D. ELLIS, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140545 

 COA: 294941 

Kent CC: 07-010348-NO 

DYKEMA GOSSETT, P.L.L.C., 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY and LINCOLN FINANCIAL 

ADVISORS CORPORATION, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question 

presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10423]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Mapping for Future 
Operations; Meetings

Summary: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Mapping for 
Future Operations will meet in closed session on May 2-3, 1995 at 
Science Applications International Corporation, Arlington, Virginia. In 
order for the Task Force to obtain time sensitive classified briefings, 
critical to the understanding of the issues, this meeting is scheduled 
on short notice.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and 
Technology) on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will develop recommendations for implementing a cost-effective 
approach for providing geospatial information and products to 
Department of Defense users.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1988)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting, concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-10423 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50978

JOSE A. RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE

CITY OF EL PASO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-97-CV-400-F)

September 4, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Housing Authority of the City of El Paso appeals a preliminary

injunction issued herein by the district court. Having considered the briefs and oral

arguments of counsel, and pertinent parts of the record, we now vacate and remand

to the district court for reconsideration, including consideration of the intervening

decision in Maria Luisa Ramirez v. The Housing Authority of the City of El Paso,

No. 97-50657 (5th Cir., August 31, 1998).
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SinoHub, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), De Hai Li , Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
        April 30, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      De Hai LiDe
      Hai LiChief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10311]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 1, 1995, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Petroleum Environmental 
Research Forum (``PERF'') has filed written notification simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing a 
change in project membership. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Murphy Oil USA, Inc., has terminated its membership with 
PERF.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of PERF. Membership remains open, and PERF intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 10, 1986, PERF filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 10, 
1995. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 1, 1995 (60 FR 11115).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-10311 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0337

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KORDY LEE DENNY,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including July 22, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve its response

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

June 18 2024

06/18/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0337
STATE of Louisiana v. Kendrick BOYD

NO. 2018-K-1690

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 1771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-00223]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Science Board Task Force on Global Positioning System 
(GPS)

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting.

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Global Positioning 
System (GPS) will meet in closed session on January 11-12, 1995 at Los 
Angeles Air Force Base, California. In order for the Task Force to 
obtain time sensitive classified briefings, critical to the 
understanding of the issues, this meeting is scheduled on short notice.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will review and recommend options available to improve GPS jam 
resistance with particular emphasis on GPS tactical weapon 
applications. The main focus of the Task Force shall be the 
investigation of techniques for improving the resistance of GPS 
embedded receivers in tactical missiles and precision munitions and 
their delivery platforms.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, 1988)), it has been 
determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters listed in 
5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1988), and that accordingly this meeting will 
be closed to the public.

    Dated: December 30, 1994.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-00223 Filed 1-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M