1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP

RODERICK G. DORMAN (SBN 96908)

LAWRENCE M. HADLEY (SBN 157728)

OMER SALIK (SBN 223056)

865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900

Los Angeles, California 90017

(213) 694-1200 - Telephone

(213) 694-1234 - Facsimile

dormanr@hbdlawyers.com; hadleyl@hbdlawyers.com;

saliko@hbdlawyers,com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and VIA 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (USA),

Defendants and Counterclaimants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Defendant and Counterclaimant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL)

Case No. 05-CV-01766 RMW (HRL)

(Cases consolidated through claim 

construction)

This document pertains to:

Case No. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL)

JOINT STIULATION AND [] 

ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 151 Filed 07/12/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-2- 2904537_1.DOC

Following Case Management Conference held on March 24, 2006, the Court adopted a 

briefing schedule for summary judgment motions that implicate claim construction issues. 

Plaintiff Computer Cache Coherency Corporation (“4C”) and Defendants VIA Technologies, 

Inc. and VIA Technologies, Inc. (USA) (collectively “VIA”) have encountered unexpected 

difficulties in scheduling certain depositions believed to be relevant to the pending motions for 

summary judgment. 4C and VIA therefore request that the dates for their respective opposition 

briefs and reply briefs be extended by two weeks, as shown in the table below.

Event Former Date New Date

Deadline for filing opposition 

to summary judgment 

motions filed on May 19, 

2006

June 30, 2006 July 14, 2006

Deadline for filing reply 

briefs in support of motions 

for summary judgment filed 

on May 19, 2006

July 14, 2006 July 28, 2006

This stipulation does not alter any of the remaining dates set forth in the May 4, 2006 

Stipulation and Order; specifically, it will not impact the scheduled date for the technology 

tutorial (August 15, 2006) and the hearing on the summary judgment motions and claim 

construction (September 19, 2006), since these dates are far enough in advance in the future. 

Further, the briefing schedule in the related litigation of Computer Cache Coherency 

Corporation v. Intel Corporation, Case No. 05-CV-1668 remains unchanged from that set forth 

in the May 4, 2006 Stipulation and Order.

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 23, 2006 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: /s/ Jennifer Ochs

Robert P. Feldman

Jennifer A. Ochs

Maura L. Rees

Matthew R. Reed

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 151 Filed 07/12/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-3- 2904537_1.DOC

Attorneys for Defendants and 

Counterclaimants

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and

VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (USA)

Dated: June 23, 2006 HENNIGAN, BENNETT & DORMAN LLP

By: /s/ Omer Salik

Omer Salik

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and 

Counterdefendants

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY 

CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED

Dated: By: 

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 151 Filed 07/12/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CASE NO. 05-CV-01668 RMW (HRL) 

-4- 2904537_1.DOC

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X

I, Omer Salik, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from each of the signatories.

Dated: June 23, 2006 By: /s/ Omer Salik

Omer Salik

Case 5:05-cv-01668-RMW Document 151 Filed 07/12/06 Page 4 of 4