alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


Exhibit 10.3

                                 LOAN AGREEMENT

$75,000                                                   NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA

                                                                 JANUARY 1, 2009

         I, WE, OR EITHER OF US, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND SOLIDARILY, PROMISE(S)
TO PAY TO THE ORDER OF NO LOGO AIR, INC., AT 310 GREENSTREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94133, SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 ($75,000.00) DOLLARS, FOR VALUE
RECEIVED, WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF TWELVE (12%) PERCENT PER ANNUM FROM DATE
UNTIL PAID, PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST PAYABLE AS FOLLOWS:

         INTEREST ONLY FOR THE FIRST THREE MONTHS, PAYABLE ON THE LAST DAY OF
         EACH OF JANUARY, FEBRUARY AND MARCH, 2009, FOLLOWED BY FIFTEEN MONTHLY
         INSTALLMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST IN THE AMOUNT OF FIVE THOUSAND
         FOUR HUNDRED NINE AND 28/100 ($5,409.28) DOLLARS, COMMENCING ON THE
         LAST DAY OF APRIL, 2009, AND ON THE LAST DAY OF EACH SUCCEEDING MONTH
         THEREAFTER.

         There shall be no penalty for the prepayment in whole or in part of any
installment of principal or interest due on this note; provided, however, that
any such prepayment shall be applied first to all accrued and unpaid interest
and the balance, if any, to the principal.

         If any installment hereon is not promptly paid when due, then all
installments payable hereon shall, at the option of the holder hereof,
immediately mature, and become due and exigible, ipso facto and at once, without
notice or demand.

         In case this note should be placed in the hands of an attorney, after
its maturity, to institute legal proceedings to recover the amount hereof, or
any part hereof, in principal or interest, or to protect the interests of the
holder hereof, or in case the same should be placed in the hands of an attorney
for collection, compromise or other action, the maker(s) and endorser(s) bind
himself (themselves) to pay the fees of the attorney who may be employed for
that purpose, which fees are hereby fixed at ten (10%) percent on the amount due
or sued for, or claimed or sought to be protected, preserved or enforced.

         No delay on the part of the holder of this note in exercising any
rights hereunder shall operate as a waiver of such rights.

         All parties hereto, severally waive presentment for payment, demand,
notice of non-payment, protest, and all pleas of division and discussion, and
agree that the payment hereof may be extended from time to time, one or more
times, without notice, hereby binding themselves, solidarily, unconditionally
and as original promissors for the payment hereof, in principal, interest, cost
and attorney's fees.



                                        BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP.


Dated: January 20, 2009                 By:  /s/ Michael J. Suder
       ----------------                      ---------------------------
                                             Michael J. Suder, President
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by First Citizens Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at March 31, 2004, March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2003, and the results of operations of
the Company for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003 .



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  | /s/ Jim B. Apple       
|                   |  | Jim B. Apple           
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  | /s/ Craig L. Nix       
|                   |  | Craig L. Nix           
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 34.1.5

 

[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank National Association: 

We have examined the accompanying management's assertion, that The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the Platform) as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007. Management has determined that servicing criteria 1I22(d)(l)(iv), 1I22(d)(4)(i) and 1I22(d)(4)(ii) are applicable to the activities it performs with respect to thePlatform, and that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the document custody services provided by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determinewhether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the period ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

***/s/ KPMG LLP***

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 29, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7088

MARION EDWARD PEARSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF MORGANTON, NORTH CAROLINA, sued in

their individual capacity; BURKE COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, POLICY

OFFICIAL; JOHN S. SUTTLE, sued in both

individual and official capacity; RONNIE

HUDSON, sued in both individual and official

capacity; KATHY ROBINSON, sued in both

individual and official capacity; BRENDA

BISSETTE, sued in both individual and official

capacity; THE NEWS HERALD, sued in their

individual capacity; PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY

OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 AND 2; JOHN DOE, Social

Worker 1 and 2; CHRISTIAN MCCLITOCK, sued in

his individual capacity; GENE BAKER, sued in

his individual capacity; ROBERT C. ERVIN, sued

in his individual capacity; WAYNE CLONTZ, sued

in his individual capacity; JOHN MCDEVITT,

sued in both individual and official capacity;

GARY DILLINGER, sued in both individual and

official capacity; TALTON DARK, sued in both

individual and official capacity; STEVE

SCHOLEBERLE, sued in both individual and

official capacity; B. J. HAMERICK, sued in

both individual and official capacity; NORTH

CAROLINA S.B.I. CRIME LAB; CLAUDE S. SITTON,

Judge; PETER W. HAISTON, judge, sued as

official; OLIVER L. NOBLE, Judge, sued as

official; BECKY BRENDLE; JULIUS A. ROUSSEAU,

JR., Judge, sued as official,

Defendants - Appellees.
2
3

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-285-1-02-MU)

Submitted: November 19, 2002 Decided: December 16, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. E. Fitzgerald

Parnell, III, POYNER & SPRUILL, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We note that we lack jurisdiction over Pearson’s claims

relating to the issuance of a nontestimonial identification order

(“NIO”) under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. See Dist. of Columbia

Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid.

Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); State v. Pearson, 566 S.E.2d 50,

55-61 (N.C. 2002) (finding sufficient evidence to support the

issuance of the NIO), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 16, 2002)

(No. 02-7164).

4

PER CURIAM:

Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See

Pearson v. City of Morganton, No. CA-01-285-1-02-MU (W.D.N.C.

June 11, 2002).*

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

|   | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    |  /s/ | Terrance M. McCarthy                  |
|--------|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   |      | Terrance M. McCarthy                  |
|   |   |      | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |      | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

----
EXECUTION VERSION
 
 RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
 2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 
 COMMON STOCKAWARD
  THIS AWARD is made by Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) to Charles J. Persico (the “Grantee") dated as of the 11th day of December, 2009 and effective as of October 20, 2009.
  WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) (capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto by the Plan);
  WHEREAS, the Grantee is an Eligible Person; and
  WHEREAS, in accordance with the Plan, the Committee and the Board have determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to grant Shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Shares”) to the Grantee.
  NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY GRANTED AS FOLLOWS:
  The Company hereby grants the Grantee twenty-five thousand (25,000) Shares in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. The Shares granted to the Grantee hereunder shall not be considered to be Restricted Stock under the Plan. The holding of the Shares is subject to all federal, state and/or local securities law restrictions imposed
generally upon the Grantee with respect to the Shares. The Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Unless they are registered, the Shares may only be offered or sold in transactions that are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction. To the extent relevant, the Plan is hereby incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein in its entirety.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has granted this Award to the Grantee as of the day and year first above written.
  RETAIL OPPORTUNITY INVESTMENTS CORP.
  
 By: /s/ John B. Roche
 Name: John B. Roche
 Title: Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 Acknowledged:
 
 
 /s/ Charles J. Persico
 Charles J. Persico
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**AILEEN CENTENO,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 123 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16th day of September, 2016, the Application f or Extraordinary** 

**Relief or King’s Bench Jurisdiction is** DENIED

**.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            93,561
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             9,575
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  15,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       18,768
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           499,280
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             498,342
<LOANS>                                        1,302,803
<ALLOWANCE>                                      (24,097)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,018,266
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,713,473
<SHORT-TERM>                                     143,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               13,788
<LONG-TERM>                                        9,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        3,282
<COMMON>                                           4,646
<OTHER-SE>                                       130,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 2,018,266
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   27,526
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  6,963
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     803
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  35,292
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                13,210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                15,321
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             19,971
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        997
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   17,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    7,478
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         7,478
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       4,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       5.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       5.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      7.91
<LOANS-NON>                                        2,818
<LOANS-PAST>                                       1,429
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     126
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       21
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  23,483
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        618
<RECOVERIES>                                         235
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 24,097
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              24,097
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           12,544
                                              

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10521]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[C-331-601]


Cut Flowers From Ecuador; Amendment to Notice of Determination To 
Revoke Countervailing Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Amendment to notice of determination to revoke countervailing 
duty order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 12, 1995, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published a notice of determination to revoke the countervailing duty 
order on cut flowers from Ecuador (60 FR 18582). That notice stated, in 
error, that the effective date of revocation was April 12, 1995. We are 
correcting that clerical error; the effective date of revocation is 
January 1, 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Albright or Maria MacKay, Office 
of Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202)482-
2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Clerical Error

    We are correcting the following clerical error in the Department's 
April 12, 1995 determination to revoke the countervailing duty order on 
cut flowers from Ecuador:
    The section which reads ``EFFECTIVE DATE: April 12, 1995'' is 
amended to read ``EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1995.''
    This notice is in accordance with 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii).

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-10521 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CENTOCOR,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          96,446
<SECURITIES>                                    77,883
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     53,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               336,922
<PP&E>                                         294,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,102,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          137,924
<BONDS>                                        460,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           709
<OTHER-SE>                                     500,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,102,547
<SALES>                                        215,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               217,868
<CGS>                                           69,622
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,033
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,220
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                     STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                   Three months ended
                                                                                                       March 31, 2001
                                                                                                   ------------------



<S>                                                                                                <C>
Income before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities                                         $ 46,035
                                                                                                   ------------------

Fixed Charges:

Interest on debt                                                                                               77,764

Estimated interest portion of rents                                                                               603
                                                                                                   ------------------
Total fixed charges                                                                                            78,367

                                                                                                   ------------------
Adjusted Income                                                                                               124,402

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                                              1.59x
                                                                                                   ==================
</TABLE>


The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities and fixed charges
by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental
expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIAN ALLEN CRAGGETTE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 18 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.