Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 83 / Monday, May 1, 1995 / Proposed Rules 21063

not result in an annual effect on the

economy of $100 million or more. There

will be no major increase in costs or

prices for consumers; individual

industries, Federal, State or local

Governments or geographic regions. It

will not have a significant adverse effect

on competition, employment,

investment, productivity, or the ability

of United States-based enterprises to

compete with foreign-based enterprises

in domestic or export markets. Pursuant

to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Pub. L.

96–354, I certify that this rule if

finalized will not have a significant

economic effect on a substantial number

of small entities as the rule would

remove a restriction allowing access to

areas to on the Outer Continental Shelf

previously unavailable.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 322

Continental shelf, Electric power,

Navigation, Water pollution control,

Waterways.

In consideration of the above, the

Corps of Engineers is proposing to

amend part 322 of title 33, as follows:

PART 322—PERMITS FOR

STRUCTURES OR WORK IN OR

AFFECTING NAVIGABLE WATERS OF

THE UNITED STATES

1. The authority citation for part 322

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 403.

2. Section 322.5 is amended by

revising the introductory text of

paragraph (l)(1), adding a new

paragraph (l)(1)(i); redesignating the

existing paragraphs (l)(1)(i) as (l)(1)(ii),

(l)(1)(ii) as (l)(1)(iii), (l)(1)(iii) as

(l)(1)(iv), (l)(1)(iv) as (l)(1)(v), (l)(1)(v) as

(l)(1)(vi) and (l)(1)(vi) as (1)(vii), and

revising newly redesignated (l)(1)(ii) to

read as follows:

§ 322.5 Special policies.

* * * * *

(1) Shipping safety fairways and

anchorage areas. * * *

(1) The Department of the Army will

grant no permits for the erection of

structures in areas designated as

fairways, except that district engineers

may permit anchors and attendant

cables or chains for floating or

semisubmersible drilling rigs to be

placed within a fairway provided the

following conditions are met:

(i) The purpose of such anchors and

attendant cables or chains as used in

this section is to stabilize floating or

semisubmersible drilling rigs which are

located outside the boundaries of the

fairway.

(ii) In water depths of 600 feet or less,

the installation of anchors and attendant

cables or chains within fairways must

be temporary and shall be allowed to

remain only 120 days. This period may

be extended by the district engineer

provided reasonable cause for such

extension can be shown and the

extension is otherwise justified. In water

depths greater than 600 feet, time

restrictions on anchors and attendant

cables or chains located within a

fairway, whether temporary or

permanent, shall not apply.

* * * * *

Dated: April 20, 1995.

Gary W. Wright,

Colonel, U.S. Army, Executive Director of

Civil Works.

[FR Doc. 95–10457 Filed 4–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–92–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 122–1–6982b; FRL–5198–6]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision, Santa

Barbara County Nonattainment Area,

Transportation Control Measure

Replacement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve

revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP) which

concern a transportation control

measure (TCM) to be implemented in

the Santa Barbara County ozone

nonattainment area.

The intended effect of proposing

approval of this SIP revision is to

control emissions of ozone precursors in

accordance with the requirements of the

Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990

(CAA or the Act). In the Final Rules

section of this Federal Register, the EPA

is approving the state’s SIP revision as

a direct final rule without prior proposal

because the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial revision amendment

and anticipates no adverse comments. A

detailed rationale for this approval is set

forth in the direct final rule. If no

adverse comments are received in

response to this proposed rule, no

further activity is contemplated in

relation to this rule. If EPA receives

adverse comments, the direct final rule

will be withdrawn and all public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this document. Any parties interested in

commenting on this action should do so

at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by May 31,

1995.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to: Deborah

Schechter, Mobile Source Section (A–2–

1), Air and Toxics Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San

Francisco, CA 94105.

Copies of the SIP revision and EPA’s

evaluation of the SIP are available for

public inspection at EPA’s Region 9

office during normal business hours.

Copies of the submitted SIP revision are

also available for inspection at the

following locations:

California Air Resources Board, 2020

‘‘L’’ Street, Sacramento, CA 92123.

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution

Control District, 26 Castillian Drive

B–23, Goleta, CA 93117.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Deborah Schechter, Mobile Source

Section, A–2–1, Air and Toxics

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street,

San Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone:

(415) 744–1227).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

document concerns a revision to the

California SIP to implement TCM–5,

Improve Commuter Public Transit

Service, in the Santa Barbara County

ozone nonattainment area and to delete

a TCM from the 1982 California ozone

SIP for Santa Barbara County. Because

Santa Barbara County is already

implementing portions of TCM–5 and

the funding and schedules for the

remainder of the TCM have been

programmed into the Federal

Transportation Improvement Program

for Santa Barbara County, and because

the State submitted a fully approvable

SIP revision, the EPA has decided to

take direct final action approving the

submittal in to the California SIP. For

further information, please see the

information provided in the direct final

action which is located in the Rules

Section of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: April 19, 1995.

Jeff Zelikson,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–10614 Filed 4–28–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P