alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated March 13, 2015, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual Report”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

Dated: March 6, 2019

 

 
|   | /s/ Bahir Manios                            |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Bahir Manios                                |
|   | CFO, Brookfield   Infrastructure Group L.P. |

 

----
Dustin Scott BUNDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4857

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I,
Stephen P. Hall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of BG Medicine, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 30, 2015



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen P. Hall                                            
|Stephen P. Hall                                                
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|(principal financial officer)
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10550]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Science Board; Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
Committee Meeting:

    Name of Committee: Army Science Board (ASB).
    Date of Meeting: 25 & 26 July 1995.
    Time of Meeting: 0900-1530, 25 & 26 July 1995.
    Place: Ft. Monroe, VA (TRADOC).
    Agenda: The Army Science Board's Ad Hoc Study on ``Tank 
Modernization'' will meet for discussions on Required Operational 
Capabilities (ROC) for the Future Main Battle Tank as well as 
doctrinal concepts for future tank/armor missions. These briefings 
will be provided by TACOM RDEC and the Army Research Laboratory. 
These meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with 
section 552b(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) 
thereof, and Title 5, U.S.C., Appendix 2, subsection 10(d). The 
classified and unclassified matters to be discussed are so 
inextricably intertwined so as to preclude opening any portion of 
these meetings. The ASB Administrative Officer, Sally Warner, may be 
contacted for further information at (703) 695-0781.
Sally A. Warner,
Administrative Officer, Army Science Board.
[FR Doc. 95-10550 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 27556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-12657]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Information Collections Under Review

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has been sent the 
following collection(s) of information proposals for review under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC Chapter 35) and the 
Paperwork Reduction Reauthorization Act since the last list was 
published. Entries are grouped into submission categories, with each 
entry containing the following information:

(1) The title of the form/collection;
(2) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the 
Department sponsoring the collection;
(3) Who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief 
abstract;
(4) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of 
time estimated for an average respondent to respond;
(5) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with 
the collection; and,
(6) An indication as to whether Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-511 
applies.

    Comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this 
notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated 
response time, should be directed to the OMB reviewer, Mr. Jeff Hill on 
(202) 395-7340 and to the Department of Justice's Clearance Officer, 
Mr. Robert B. Briggs, on (202) 514-4319. If you anticipate commenting 
on a form/collection, but find that time to prepare such comments will 
prevent you from prompt submission, you should notify the OMB reviewer 
and the Department of Justice Clearance Officer of your intent as soon 
as possible. Written comments regarding the burden estimate or any 
other aspect of the collection may be submitted to Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
Washington, DC 20503, and to Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Department of 
Justice Clearance Officer, Systems Policy Staff/Information Resources 
Management/Justice Management Division Suite 850, WCTR, Washington, DC 
20530.

New Collection

(1) COPS Standard Hiring Program Application.
(2) COPS 010/01. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, United 
States Department of Justice.
(3) Primary=State, Local or Tribal Government, Others=None. The COPS 
Standard Hiring Program Application is to be used to apply for grants 
for additional police hiring or to establish new municipal police 
agencies to address crime and related problems through community 
policing.
(4) 3200 annual respondents at 5.5 hours per response.
(5) 24,000 annual burden hours.
(6) Not applicable under Section 3504(h) of Public Law 96-511.

    Public comment on this item is encouraged.

    Dated: May 18, 1995.
Robert B. Briggs,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 94-12657 Filed 5-23-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-21-M
```
!"# $$$$$$$$$$"!$$$$$$$$$$























%&'()*(++,-. 	 	

/0+0)1')*,-. 2344562786797:8;8<79:=856 >,/0+0)1')*?-@)'A0@')1@'11B0--.

C#D!EFG	 H#
EG!""!#GF#EGG"EI"EG!G "#E"EFGJ"!!""KG!#EE"DELE			 M	

"NIG"#K!!C"##EK"E"
! #LE"!M"E"	#C""D"E#K!!"K!!O"GJ C#EEE"">

!G!"KEJPEFDGE!CD"EFG!"#"!EEE#K	Q!G"C""C##"	

RSTUV@WX@RWYUZ > [(\)'*]B0@^+@R&0B_@^B@/0`]*a@R&0B_

bcdefgdhijkedjlecmnopjmcdhjo qrstuvwrxyz{|r}wt~rx~~w



  ¡¢¢£¤¢£¥¦§¢ ̈©£a§ ©¢«¤¥ ̈¬ ­®¦¥¦©¦£©©¦  ̄¢°¦¢ ̈ ±23± ́

μ¶· ̧1o»1⁄41⁄2o¶3⁄4¿À¶Á3⁄4 ÂÃÄÅÆ3⁄4Ç1⁄2 ̧o¿ÈÈÉ ÊËÌÍÎ3⁄4 ̧·1oÄ ̧ÅÏÂ·13⁄4Ð1ÑÌÅÒÓÃÆÆo Ô¶ÄÅÉ¶ÃÆÂÃÅÆÑÕÂ ËÖ×Í×

Case 3:16-cv-07213-SK Document 2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 2
	

MF
 	 ØÙ55Ú75Ú72ÛÙ;8:Û ÜÝÞßàáàâãäßåæáàÞåçèéáæåäáêâáëßèâéáìßäÞáäÞâáãåçíäáçæèâààáíâîçßíâéáêïáðâéñáòñáóßôñáõñáöáÜè÷÷ #!",)'A0@^+@()1(ø(1]'&@')1@*(*&0ù@(+@')a. C"EDG,1'*0. 	

ú K"G"E##EE@,`&'û0.,1'*0. ü" ú !##EEO"E"K!DEC#,)'A0. JK"!DFEE"C#"E#"J ,1'*0. JEEKG#EEOýCEE"ü" ú "E#,)'A0@^+@()1(ø(1]'&. JC# EFEDGCK"!K"D#!!,)'A0@^+@^B\')(þ'*(^). ,1'*0. ü" ú ""E#ED ü" ú #",-`0û(+a.

	

G!" !""E !""J!"! 	

E"E"KG!K"P"G##!""	 > [0Bø0B?-@-(\)'*]B0

%B()*01@)'A0@')1@*(*&0

[0Bø0B?-@'11B0-- EE!""F"EFKE"J>



Case 3:16-cv-07213-SK Document 2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 2 of 2
Hanoi HORMACHEA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 12, 2019

Hanoi Hormachea, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.570 ("No irregularity in the rendition or reception of a verdict may be raised unless it is raised before the jury is discharged. No irregularity in the recording of a verdict shall affect its validity unless the defendant was in fact prejudiced by the irregularity."); *Sanchez v. State*, 490 So.2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
exv10w66







Exhibit 10.66



FIRST AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          THIS AMENDMENT by and between BIOGEN IDEC INC., (the “Company”), and Craig Eric Schneier,
Ph.D. (the “Executive”), dated as of September ___, 2008.




          WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of
October 8, 2001 (the “October 8, 2001 Agreement”); and




          WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to amend the October 8, 2001 Agreement as set
forth herein.




          NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:





	 	1.	 	The following sentence is added to the first full paragraph of the October 8, 2001
Agreement






	 	 	 	“It is a condition of your employment with the Company that Jim Mullen will be President
and Chief Executive Officer during your tenure with the Company.”






	 	2.	 	The paragraph relating to “Severance Benefits” is hereby amended and restated by the
replacement in full with the following:






	 	 	 	“- Severance Benefits: You will be eligible for severance benefits pursuant to the
U.S. Severance Plan for Executive Vice Presidents (the “Severance Plan”) on the terms
and conditions provided therein; provided, however, that you will also be eligible for
benefits thereunder in the event that you terminate your employment on account of a
material breach of the provision in this letter in that Jim Mullen is no longer
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. You will not be an employee of
Biogen during the severance period and you will not accrue any benefits or other rights
(such as, but not limited to, pension plan vesting or accrual, stock option vesting,
vacation pay, etc.) during such period except health benefits as described in the
“Severance Plan”. In addition to the severance benefits described above, the unforgiven
amount of the Forgivable Loan referenced on the first page of this letter would be
forgiven based on the definition of termination as noted herein.”





Signed:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Craig Eric Schneier
 

Craig Eric Schneier, Ph.D. (Executive)

	 	 	 	   10/8/08
 

Date
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Mike Thomas

	 	 	 	   10/7/08	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Mike Thomas (on behalf of the Company)

	 	 	 	Date
Keathel CHAUNCEY, Esquire, as trustee only, under the 512 Hatchwood Drive Land Trust, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Successor TRUSTEE TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, on behalf of the holders of Bear Sterns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE3, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-HE3, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2488

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1951

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PATRICK LOCKHART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00808-MSN-IDD)

Submitted: March 31, 2023 Decided: April 4, 2023

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Lockhart, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1951 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/04/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lockhart appeals the district court’s orders (a) remanding to state court 

Lockhart’s criminal prosecution on two misdemeanor charges, which Lockhart attempted 

to remove to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1); and (b) denying Lockhart’s 

motion for reconsideration of the remand ruling. We have reviewed the record and discern 

no error in the court’s rulings. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Virginia 

v. Lockhart, No. 1:22-cv-00808-MSN-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 2022 & Sept. 1, 2022). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1951 Doc: 17 Filed: 04/04/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-3848]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER95-342-000]


PacifiCorp; Notice of Filing

February 9, 1994.
    Take notice that on January 23, 1995, Sierra Pacific Power Company, 
tendered for filing a Certificate of Concurrence in above-referenced 
docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before February 23, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-3848 Filed 2-15-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 24

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-25 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1  ELITE ARTZ, INC.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Elite Artz, Inc. (the ACompany@) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (a) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:   November 6, 2007 /s/ Lau Hing Bun Lau Hing Bun Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 17-CR-00068 EJD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

GAIL SHIFMAN

Law Office of Gail Shifman 

2431 Fillmore Street 

San Francisco, CA 94115-1814 

Tel: 415-551-1500 

Email: gail@shifmangroup.com

JAMES S. THOMSON

Attorney and Counselor at Law 

732 Addison Street, Suite A 

Berkeley, CA 94710 

Tel: 510-525-9123 

Email: james@ycbtal.net

Attorneys for Defendant

JOSE NOE RAMIREZ-AVELAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

The parties last appeared before the Court on August 28, 2023, and are next scheduled to appear 

before the Court on December 4, 2023. The parties are jointly seeking to continue the next court 

appearance to February 5, 2024. The Court previously set trial to commence on April 2, 2024, and 

excluded Speedy Trial time through that scheduled trial date. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ERICK ESCALANTE-TORRES, and

JOSE NOE RAMIREZ-AVELAR,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CR 17-0068-EJD

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Case 5:17-cr-00068-EJD Document 456 Filed 11/28/23 Page 1 of 2
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. 17-CR-00068 EJD 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: November 28, 2023

ISMAIL J. RAMSEY

United States Attorney

/s/Stephen Meyer

STEPHEN MEYER

ASEEM PADUKONE

Assistant United States Attorneys

/s/Richard Tamor /s/Gail Shifman

RICHARD TAMOR GAIL SHIFMAN and JAMES S. THOMSON

Counsel for Defendant Erick Escalante-Torres Counsel for Defendant Jose Noe Ramirez-Avelar

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION

The Court hereby continues the status conference from December 4, 2023, to February 5, 2024. 

The Court previously excluded time under the Speedy Trial Act through the trial date of April 2, 2024. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 28, 2023 ________________________________

HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:17-cr-00068-EJD Document 456 Filed 11/28/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 795 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 795

       Designating September 2022 as ``School Bus Safety Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2022

 Mrs. Fischer (for herself, Mr. Peters, and Mr. Warnock) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating September 2022 as ``School Bus Safety Month''.

Whereas, in an average year, on every school day in the United States, 
        approximately 506,520 public and private school buses carry more than 
        26,000,000 K-12 students to and from school;
Whereas school buses comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the 
        United States;
Whereas, in an average year, 48 percent of all K-12 students ride a school bus 
        for each of the 180 school days in a year, and school bus operators 
        drive school buses a total of nearly 4,400,000,000 miles;
Whereas the Child Safety Network (referred to in this preamble as the ``CSN''), 
        which is celebrating 33 years of public service in the United States, 
        supports the CSN Safe Ride campaign, which is designed to provide the 
        school bus industry with driver training, the latest technology, and 
        free safety and security resources, including resources to help parents 
        raise safer and healthier children;
Whereas the designation of School Bus Safety Month will allow broadcast and 
        digital media and social networking industries to commit to 
        disseminating public service announcements that are produced to--

    (1) provide free resources designed to safeguard children;

    (2) recognize school bus operators and professionals; and

    (3) encourage the driving public to engage in safer driving behavior 
near school buses when students board and disembark from school buses;

Whereas key leaders who deserve recognition during School Bus Safety Month and 
        beyond have--

    (1) provided security awareness training materials to more than 14,000 
public and private schools;

    (2) trained more than 118,139 school bus operators; and

    (3) provided more than 166,798 counterterrorism guides to individuals 
who are key to providing both safety and security for children in the 
United States; and

Whereas School Bus Safety Month offers the Senate and the people of the United 
        States an opportunity to recognize and thank the school bus operators 
        and the professionals focused on school bus safety and security in the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates September 2022 as ``School Bus 
Safety Month''.
                                 <all>
```
ITEM 6. (A)

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR NET INCOME PER SHARE)


                                                               NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                              ------------------
                                                                2001      2000
                                                              --------  --------
Net income                                                    $ 24,433  $ 20,952
Less:  Preferred stock dividends                                   124       127
                                                              --------  --------
Net income applicable to common stock                         $ 24,309  $ 20,825

Weighted average common shares outstanding-
  basic and diluted                                            934,828   937,341

Net income per common share-basic and diluted                 $  25.99  $  22.22


<PAGE>
Steve STERLIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-292

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EAST COAST CAPITAL INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. NAIMA GROUP, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D18-535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Dieppa Law Firm, P.A., and Eduardo E. Dieppa, III, Hialeah, for appellants.

Escalante Yormack Law, PLLC, and Francisco J. Escalante and Adam J. Yormack, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee*, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that the appellate court should affirm the trial court's judgment where "the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error"); *Dabas v. Boston Invr's. Grp., Inc.*, 231 So.3d 542, 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (concluding that the borrower's due process rights were not violated *485where the borrower's counsel received notice of, and participated fully at, a non-evidentiary hearing without objection and without seeking a continuance of the hearing).
Hewitt A. GRANT II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3312

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10
in
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGELIO MAY RUIZ,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 17-cv-00338-CRB

7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

MICHAEL SEXTON,
Defendant.

Rogelio Ruiz has moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. Dkt.
14. The state is hereby ORDERED to show cause why Ruiz’s motion should not be
granted. The state is ORDERED to respond within 60 days from the entry of this Order.

Ruiz shall file a reply brief not later than 30 days after the government’s response is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED. LE
Dated: Oct. 17, 2017

CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge