alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 686 

Designating July 23, 2022, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2022 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CRAPO, 

Ms. ERNST, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. KELLY, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. TESTER, Mr. 

THUNE, and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 20, 2022 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 23, 2022, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ‘‘cowboys’’, helped to establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliations; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 686 ATS 

Whereas the cowboy, who lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment, is an excellent steward 

of the land and its creatures; 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy through the work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who contribute to the economic well-being of every State; 

Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working 

ranch rodeo events annually, making rodeo one of the 

most-watched sports in the United States; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

cowboys span every generation and transcend race and 

gender; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 23, 2022, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

SRES 686 ATS 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 activities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons Case No.: 5:17-civ-00644-JSW

LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND (SBN 88184)

LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND

455 Market Street, Suite 1910

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 882-3288

Facsimile: (415) 882-3299

E-Mail: ltownsend@owe.com

Attorneys for Defendants

KELVIN INOCENT, YMA INOCENT,

IRON PEAK HOLDINGS, LLC dba

CONCEALED AMERICAONLINE.COM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

ORIONCLICK LLC a California limited

liability company,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KELVIN INOCENT, an individual, YMA

INOCENT, an individual, IRON PEAK

HOLDINGS, LLC, a Texas limited liability

company dba CONCEALED

AMERICAONLINE.COM, and DOES 1

through 10, incusive,

Defendants.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 5:17-cv-00644-JSW

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED

ENTITIES OR PERSONS

Pursuant to Civil L. R. 3-15, the undersigned certifies that the following listed persons,

associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other

entities (i) have financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the

proceeding, or (ii) have a non-financial interest in that subject matter or in a party that could be

substantially affected by the outcome of this proceeding:

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS Document 25 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons Case No.: 5:17-civ-00644-JSW

1. None other than named Defendants.

Dated: June 2, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE G. TOWNSEND

By: /s/ Lawrence G. Townsend

Lawrence G. Townsend

Attorneys For Defendants KELVIN INOCENT, YMA

INOCENT, IRON PEAK HOLDINGS, LLC dba

CONCEALED AMERICAONLINE.COM

S:\LGT-TENA\INOCENT\Cert-InterestedEntities.wpd

Case 3:17-cv-00644-JCS Document 25 Filed 06/02/17 Page 2 of 2
---

Exhibit 99.15


CONSENT OF EXPERT To:

   United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549Alberta Securities CommissionBritish Columbia Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionRio Alto Mining Limited
 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Technical report entitled “La Arena Project, Peru”, effective December 31st, 2013 (the “Report” prepared for Rio Alto Mining Limited (the “Company") I, Mark Smith, do hereby confirm that I am a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 and a co-author of the Report. The undersigned, for himself, pursuant to Section 8.3 of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects confirms thatthis letter is being filed as the consent to the use of extracts from, or summaries of, the Report in the Company's Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the "AIF") and to being named in the AIF. The undersigned further acknowledges that the AIF will be filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Form 40-F") and consents to being named in the Form 40-F and authorize the use of the information represented therein relating to the Report.  DATED the 28th day of March 2014 By:

   /s/ Mr. Mark E. SmithName: Mr. Mark E. Smith, M Sc, PE, GE, RM(SME), D GE(AGP),Company: RRD International Corp.Title: President


---
EX-4.15






Exhibit 4.15




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accountant




     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form F-8
of Fronteer Development Group Inc. of our report dated March 28, 2007 to the shareholders of
NewWest Gold Corporation (“NewWest”) dated
March 28, 2007 on the consolidated balance
sheets of NewWest as at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 2006, and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the Offer and Circular.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Toronto, Ontario	  	(signed) KPMG LLP
 	 
	January 23, 2009 	 	KPMG LLP 	 
	 	 	Chartered Accountants

Licensed Public Accountants
Mitchell T. WATSON, Appellant, v. Julia JONES, secretary of Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2816

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 27, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Amanda Stone COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3235

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 4:05-cr-00308-DLJ Document 22 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:05-cr-00308-DLJ Document 22 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 2
Kuang-Bao P. OU-YOUNG, petitioner, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General.

No. 12-1018.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-11146

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alfredo Lopez-Enciso, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-149-4

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Alfredo Lopez-Enciso has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Lopez-Enciso has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-11146 Document: 00516460155 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2022
No. 21-11146

2

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as 

Lopez-Enciso’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-11146 Document: 00516460155 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2022
#### Galina DAGENVALDE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE and John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents.

No. 02-4289.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 17, 2004.

Paulette Detiberiis, Kuba, Mundy & Associates, New York, N.Y., for Petitioner.

David S. Rubenstein, Assistant United States Attorney (Sara L. Shudofsky, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for David N. Kelley, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, N.Y., for Respondents.

Present: LEVAL, KATZMANN, Circuit Judges, and MURTHA,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable J. Garvan Murtha, of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Petitioner Galina Dagenvalde, a native of the former Soviet Union and a legal permanent resident of Latvia, petitions this Court for review of the final order of removal of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). We review the factual findings of the BIA and of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) pursuant to the “substantial evidence standard.” *Secaida-Rosales v. INS,*331 F.3d 297, 306-07 (2d Cir.2003). “Under this standard, we will not disturb a factual finding if it is supported by ‘reasonable, substantial, and probative’ evidence in the record when considered as a whole.” *Chen v. INS,*344 F.3d 272, 275 (2d Cir. 2003). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Upon review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Dagenvalde failed to establish either past persecution or reasonable fear of future persecution. While the evidence shows that Dagenville was subjected to discrimination and harassment, a reasonable fact finder could have found that this treatment did not rise to the level of persecution. Accordingly, the IJ and BIA did not err in finding that Dagenvalde was not a refugee within the meaning of § 101(a)(42) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42) (2000) and was therefore ineligible for asylum under INA § 208, 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (2000). *See Melgar de Torres v. Reno,*191 F.3d 307, 311 (2d Cir. 1999). For the same reasons, the IJ properly determined that Dagenvalde failed to establish a “clear probability” that she would suffer persecution if returned to Latvia. She therefore failed to satisfy the more stringent standard necessary to prevail on her withholding of deportation claim. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) (2000); 8 *784C.F.R. § 208.16(b)(1); *see also Zhang v. Slattery,*55 F.3d 732, 738 (2d Cir.1995). Finally, Dagenvalde has waived her Convention Against Torture claim by failing to raise it on appeal to the BIA or in her brief to this Court. *See Howell v. INS,*72 F.3d 288, 291 (2d Cir.1995) (“[A] party may not seek federal judicial review of an adverse administrative determination until the party has first sought all possible relief within the agency itself.”) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Accordingly, Dagenville’s instant petition is DENIED.
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QS10 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under
the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi    
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi        
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT CARL GORSKI, No. 2:16-CV-2109-KJM-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

COUNTY OF MARIN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. For cases such as this,

which are based on federal question jurisdiction, the federal venue statute requires that the action

be brought only in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in

the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving

rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is

situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in

which the action may otherwise be brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Here, the claim(s) arose

in Marin County, which is within the boundaries of the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California. Therefore, the court finds that this action most appropriately

proceeds in that district. In the interest of justice, the court will transfer this case. See 28 U.S.C.

1

Case 3:17-cv-00322-JSC Document 4 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

§ 1406(a).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the

United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 

DATED: December 9, 2016

____________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 3:17-cv-00322-JSC Document 4 Filed 12/09/16 Page 2 of 2
Robert KASAK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST CO., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1969

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
John Lezell BALENTINE, petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 12-5906.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Trevino v. Thaler* , 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1747, 185 L.Ed.2d 783 (2013).
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Stephen F. Wiggins, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golden Pond Healthcare, Inc. (“registrant”); 

2. Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) (omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238); 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 28, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLASS ACTION

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6)

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00152-VC

38611112v.1

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Eric Michael Lloyd (SBN 254390)

elloyd@seyfarth.com

560 Mission Street, Suite 3100

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 397-2823

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Frederick T. Smith (admitted pro hac vice)

fsmith@seyfarth.com

Esther Slater McDonald (admitted pro hac vice)

emcdonald@seyfarth.com

1075 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2500

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3958

Telephone: (404) 885-1500

Facsimile: (404) 892-7056

Attorneys for Defendant

FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS CHISM, on behalf of himself, all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEPSICO, INC., a North Carolina Corporation;

FRITO-LAY, INC., a Delaware Corporation;

FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND

SERVICES CORP., a Florida Corporation; and

DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00152-VC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT FIRST ADVANTAGE

BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP.’S

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLASS

ACTION COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

12(B)(6)

Date: May 25, 2017

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 4

Complaint Filed: January 12, 2017

Complaint Served: January 23, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 27 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLASS ACTION

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6)

CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00152-VC

38611112v.1

This matter came before the Court on Defendant FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND

SERVICES CORP.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Marcus Chism’s Complaint. In addition to the

pleadings on file, the Court has reviewed all pleadings files in support of and in opposition to the Motion

and has considered the oral argument of counsel.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Court GRANTS First Advantage’s Motion to Dismiss. The Court

hereby dismisses Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice as to First Advantage only.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ________________________, 2017

__________________________________

The Honorable Vince Chhabria

Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 27 Filed 04/17/17 Page 2 of 2
ERNIE MORRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. CONTRAX FURNISHINGS, LLC, Meteor Education, LLC, and Greg S. Cave, an individual, Appellees.

No. 1D19-0735

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DISMISSED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SON LAWRENCE BROHMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00655-JD 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, a former detainee, has filed a civil rights action that was dismissed with leave to 

amend. Court mail that the clerk sent to plaintiff at his last known address has been returned as 

undeliverable because plaintiff is no longer in custody. Plaintiff has not provided a current 

mailing address.

More than sixty days have passed since the mail was returned. This case is DISMISSED

without prejudice. See Local R. 3-11(b). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 7, 2017

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SON LAWRENCE BROHMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00655-JD 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on November 7, 2017, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by 

placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery 

receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Son Lawrence Brohman ID: CC16IL924

901 Court Street Martinez Detention Facility

Martinez, CA 94553 

Dated: November 7, 2017

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

By:________________________

LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the 

Honorable JAMES DONATO
Michael K. LEGGETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3854

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.