alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 2 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 3 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 4 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 5 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 6 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 7 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 8 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 9 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 10 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 11 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 12 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 13 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 14 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 15 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 16 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 17 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 18 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 19 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 20 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 21 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 22 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 23 of 24
Case 5:17-cv-00521-HRL Document 16 Filed 12/02/16 Page 24 of 24
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10839]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Subsistence Resource Commission Meeting

SUMMARY: The Superintendent of Lake Clark National Park and the 
Chairperson of the Subsistence Resource Commission for Lake Clark 
National Park announce a forthcoming meeting of the Lake Clark National 
Park Subsistence Resource Commission.
    The following agenda items will be discussed:

(1) Chairman's welcome.
(2) Introduction of Commission members and guests.
(3) Review agenda.
(4) Approval of minutes of last meeting.
(5) Superintendent's welcome:
    --Park subsistence resource update.
(6) Old business:
    --Update of roster regulation.
(7) New business:
    a. Election of Chairperson.
    b. Status of Commission appointments.
(8) Agency comments and public comments.
(9) Hunting plan recommendation work session.
(10) Determine time and date of next meeting.
(11) Adjourn.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, May 22, 1995. The meeting 
will begin at 10:00 a.m. and conclude around 5 p.m.

LOCATION: The meeting will be held at the City Hall in Nondalton, 
Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ralph Tingey, Superintendent, Lake 
Clark National Park, 4230 University Dr., #311, Anchorage, AK 99508. 
Phone (907) 271-3751.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subsistence Resource Commissions are 
authorized under Title VIII, Section 808, of the Alaska National 
Interest Lands Conservation Act, Pub. L. 96-487, and operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committees Act.
Ralph Tingey,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 95-10839 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
Jwaun Jamaal STRUM v. STATE

CR-16-0701

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10227]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Notice of Request for Reclearance of Form RI 20-80

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (title 
44, U.S. Code, chapter 35), this notice announces a request for 
reclearance of an information collection. Form RI 20-80, Alternative 
Annuity Election, is used for individuals who are eligible to elect 
whether to receive a reduced annuity and a lump-sum payment equal to 
their retirement contributions (alternative form of annuity) or an 
unreduced annuity and no lump sum.
    Approximately 500 RI 20-80 forms are completed annually. The form 
requires approximately 20 minutes to complete. The annual burden is 167 
hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Doris R. Benz on (703) 908-
8564.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before May 
26, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW., 3349, Washington, DC 20415
    and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-4025.

Office of Personnel Management.
Lorraine A. Green,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 95-10227 Filed 4-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
Exhibit 32.1
   1.
    
    Dionex Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, and
to which this Certification is attached (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.
 By:
    /s/ Frank WitneyName:
    Frank WitneyTitle:
    President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
    May 10, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2347

CHARYLE G. EMEL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOGO WEST,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-97-130-A)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charyle G. Emel, Appellant Pro Se. Major Thomas Mercer Ray, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in her civil rights action, in which

she alleged she suffered employment discrimination based on her

race and her gender. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Emel v. West, No.

CA-97-130-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<CASH>                                        10706227
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          598211
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               5550000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  112518957
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        18403963
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          18284225
<LOANS>                                      106181595
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3166406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               263060964
<DEPOSITS>                                   233620347
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1127305
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7500000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    20813312
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               263060964
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7266481
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              5708538
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                459481
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              13434500
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               11427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4800793
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          8633707
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   400000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              274624
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                6074612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5250323
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     5250323
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3679619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.63
<LOANS-NON>                                     593672
<LOANS-PAST>                                    493940
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                298197
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                2673247
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3077187
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   389526
<RECOVERIES>                                     78745
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3166406
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2897043
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         269363 
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Carl Ritter, Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Carl Ritter              
| | -----------------------------
| | Carl Ritter                  
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (principal executive officer)
| | December 15, 2006            

---
Debt Extension Agreement


 Exhibit 10.1 
 December 31, 2008 
 ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. (“ClearPoint”) 
 1600 Manor Drive, Suite 110 
 Chalfont, PA 18914 
 Re: Debt Extension Agreement 
 Dear Sirs: 

Reference is made to the Promissory Note dated as of August 14, 2006 in the original principal amount of $450,000 issued by ClearPoint to
Shareholders of Staffbridge, Inc. (“Lender”), as amended by that certain Amendment to Note dated December 31, 2007, which increased the original principal amount to $486,690, and as further amended by that certain Debt Extension
Agreement dated June 30, 2008, which extended the due date for payment of the entire principal balance to December 31, 2008 following a payment of $150,000 and any amounts due and payable for work performed as a contractor to ClearPoint by
Lender (the “Note”). 
 Lender hereby agrees to further amend the Note as follows. The current outstanding balance of the Note of
$336,690 shall be paid according to the following schedule: (i) $100,000 shall be paid on or about December 31, 2008 and (ii) the remaining balance shall be paid in four equal quarterly payments of $59,172.50 beginning on
March 31, 2009 and ending on December 31, 2009. 
 This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors
and permitted assigns of the Lender and the addressees hereof. This agreement may not be amended or modified, nor may any provision hereof be waived, without the prior written consent of the party to be charged therewith. This agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 
 [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]








			
	Very truly yours,
	
	SHAREHOLDER OF STAFFBRIDGE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Scott Nieh

	Name:	 	Scott Nieh
	Title:	 	
	
	SHAREHOLDER OF STAFFBRIDGE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Nigel Lui

	Name:	 	Nigel Lui
	Title:	 	


  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	CLEAR POINT BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John G. Phillips

	Name:	 	John G. Phillips
	Title:	 	CFO

 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO DEBT EXTENSION AGREEMENT]
Exhibit 10.1


 


Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


 


KEMET
Corporation (the “Company”) compensates each member of its Board of Directors
(the “Board”) who is not an employee of the Company or its subsidiaries.  On July 29, 2008, the Board unanimously
approved a modification to the current compensation plan for its independent
directors by (i) reducing the Board annual director’s fees by 10%, (ii) reducing
the Board committee annual retainer fees by 10%, and (iii) reducing the
Board and committee meeting fees by 25%. 
As of the Company’s third fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008,
the compensation structure of the Board is as follows. The Chairman of the
Board is paid an annual director’s fee of $54,000. Each director (other than
the Chairman and any employee director) is paid an annual director’s fee of
$31,500. In addition, all directors (other than any employee director) receive
an annual grant of 2,500 shares of restricted stock of the Company. No director
who is a full-time employee of the Corporation is paid an annual director’s
fee. The Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board receives an annual
retainer of $6,750, and each member of that Committee receives an annual
retainer of $4,500. The Chairmen of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee each receive an annual retainer of $4,500,
and each member of each of these Committees receives an annual retainer of
$2,700. All directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with attending meetings. Each director (other than any employee
director) receives as additional compensation a fee of $1,125 per meeting for
attendance at each meeting of the Board and for attendance at each meeting of a
committee of the Board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from National
Property Investors 6 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000708870
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 6
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,760
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          67,780
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         26,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,755)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,325
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,756
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       375
<EPS-BASIC>                                     3.39<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Alan Scott LEVE, DC #H49109, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

Case No. 16-MD-02752-LHK 

ORDER STAYING CASE AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PENDING MOTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER 

DATA SECURITY BREACH 

LITIGATION

Case No. 16-MD-02752-LHK 

ORDER STAYING CASE AND 

DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

PENDING MOTIONS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 246, 248, 301, 302, 303, 304

On January 28, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of class 

action settlement. ECF Nos. 353. On January 29, 2019, the Court ordered the parties to file a joint 

status report indicating how they wish to proceed. ECF No. 354. The Court stated that “[i]f the 

parties wish to engage in further settlement negations, the Court will likely stay the instant MDL 

case for 60 days.” ECF No. 354. On January 30, 2019, the Court amended the order denying the 

motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement. ECF No. 357.

On February 7, 2019, the parties filed a joint status report “request[ing] the Court stay this 

action for 60 days so they can engage in further settlement negotiations to address the issues raised 

by the Court.” ECF No. 360.

Accordingly, the Court STAYS this action for 60 days.

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 361 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 16-MD-02752-LHK 

ORDER STAYING CASE AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PENDING MOTIONS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The parties shall file a new settlement agreement and a new motion for preliminary 

approval of class action settlement by Monday, April 8, 2019.

Currently pending before the Court are the motion for class certification, ECF No. 246;

motions to seal, ECF Nos. 248 and 304; and motions to exclude expert report, declarations, and 

testimony, ECF Nos. 301, 302, and 303. All pending motions are DENIED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute, they may refile these motions. Civil 

Local Rule 79-5(f)(2) provides that if a motion to seal is denied in its entirety, the document 

sought to be sealed will not be considered by the Court unless the submitting party files an 

unredacted version of the document within 7 days after the motion is denied. Because these 

motions are denied without prejudice, the parties need not refile unredacted versions of these 

documents at this time. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute and they refile these 

motions, the Court at that time will apply the appropriate standard for sealing and rule on the 

renewed sealing motions.

The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the case file. This is an internal 

administrative procedure that does not affect the rights of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 7, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 361 Filed 02/07/19 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20289-20290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10125]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Houston Lighting & Power Co., City Public Service Board of San 
Antonio and Central Power and Light Co.; City of Austin, Texas; Notice 
of Partial Withdrawal of Application for Amendments to Facility 
Operating Licences

[Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499]
    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Houston Lighting & Power Company, et al., (the licensee) 
to partially withdraw its November 8, 1994, application for proposed 
amendments to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-76 and NPF-80 for the 
South Texas Project (STP), Units 1 and 2, located in Matagorda County, 
Texas.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical 
Specifications (TSs) to require only one of the two battery chargers 
associated with each Class IE 125 VDC Channel I and Channel IV to be 
operable, in TS 3/4.8.2.1, D.C. Sources, Operating, and in TS 3/
4.8.2.2, D.C. Sources, Shutdown.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on December 7, 
1994, (59 FR 63123). However, by letter dated March 14, 1995, the 
licensee withdrew that portion of the proposed change regarding TS 3/
4.8.2.2, because [[Page 20290]] the required wording was incorporated 
into this TS by Amendment Nos. 71 and 60, issued by the NRC on February 
14, 1995, in response to another amendment request.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated November 8, 1994, and the licensee's 
letter dated March 14, 1995, which withdrew a portion of the 
application for license amendments. The above documents are available 
for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the 
Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local 
public document room located at the Wharton County Junior College, J. 
M. Hodges Learning Center, 911 Boling Highway, Wharton, TX 77488.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day of April 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lawrence E. Kokajko,
Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate IV-1, Division of Reactor 
Projects--III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-10125 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
HYUNG M. LEE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, N.A, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3592

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.

Canceled.