alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32248]



[[Page 104]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. RP95-48-001]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

December 27, 1994.
    Take notice that on December 21, 1994, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (Koch Gateway) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 1809
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 1810
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 1811

    Koch Gateway states that the above referenced tariff sheets reflect 
Koch Gateway's compliance with the Office of Pipeline Regulation Letter 
Order issued December 16, 1994. Koch Gateway states that these tariff 
sheets reflect modifications to explain the calculation of the average 
storage rate.
    Koch Gateway also states that the tariff sheets are being mailed to 
all parties on the official service list created by the Secretary in 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 
of the Commission's regulations. All such protests should be filed on 
or before January 4, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining appropriate action to be taken, but will not 
serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-32248 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Sean Darnell FOWLKES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9947.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10392]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems; Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering and Environmental 
Systems (#1189).
    Date and Time: May 18, 1995; 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1120, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Fred G. Heineken, Program Director, Biochemical 
Engineering and Biotechnology, Room 565, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Phone: (703) 
306-1319.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Biotechnology Group Proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal being reviewed includes 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data such as salaries; and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-10392 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  MTX
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,104
<INVENTORY>                                     67,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,127
<PP&E>                                         211,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          390,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       117,744
<OTHER-SE>                                    (131,765)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,587
<SALES>                                        177,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               416,906
<CGS>                                           43,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  557,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,412
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (137,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (137,077)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Marc CLEMENTS, Warden, petitioner, v. Elliot Don RAY.

No. 12-1145.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                     STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Nine months ended
                                                                      September 30, 2001
                                                                      ------------------

<S>                                                                        <C>
Income before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities       $132,916
                                                                           --------

Fixed Charges:

Interest on debt                                                            214,006

Estimated interest portion of rents                                           1,740
                                                                           --------
Total fixed charges                                                         215,746
                                                                           --------
Adjusted Income                                                             348,662

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                            1.62x
                                                                           ========
</TABLE>

The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing income
before income taxes and distributions on preferred securities and fixed charges
by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on debt and one-third rental
expense as representative of interest portion of rentals.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10369]



[[Page 20720]]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting of the Literature 
Selection Technical Review Committee

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee, National 
Library of Medicine, on June 1-2, 1995, convening at 9 a.m. on June 1 
and at 8:30 a.m. on June 2 in the Board Room of the National Library of 
Medicine, Building 38, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    The meeting on June 1 will be open to the public from 9 a.m. to 
approximately 10:30 a.m. for the discussion of administrative reports 
and program developments. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Mrs. Lois Ann Colaianni at 301-496-6921 
two weeks before the meeting.
    In accordance with provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(9)(B), 
Title 5, U.S.C., Public Law 92-463, the meeting will be closed on June 
1 from 10:30 a.m. to approximately 5 p.m. and on June 2 from 8:30 a.m. 
to adjournment for the review and discussion of individual journals as 
potential titles to be indexed by the National Library of Medicine. The 
presence of individuals associated with these publications could hinder 
fair and open discussion and evaluation of individual journals by the 
Committee members.
    Mrs. Lois Ann Colaianni, Scientific Review Administrator of the 
Committee, and Associate Director, Library Operations, National Library 
of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, telephone 
number: 301-496-6921, will provide a summary of the meeting, rosters of 
the committee members, and other information pertaining to the meeting.

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10369 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Parnell SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-483

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 18, 2019

Parnell Smith, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*1141Affirmed. *See* § 775.082(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983) (providing that a person who has been convicted of a life felony *committed prior to* October 1, 1983 may be punished "by a term of imprisonment for life *or for a term of years not less than 30* and, for a life felony *committed on or after* October 1, 1983, by a term of imprisonment for life or by a term of imprisonment not exceeding 40 years") (emphasis added).
Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 US.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Veridicom International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         /s/ Paul Mann
         ---------------------------------------
         Paul Mann
         President (Principal Executive Officer)

         /s/ Bashir Jaffer
         ---------------------------------------
         /s/ Bashir Jaffer
         Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

         August 10, 2004










         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Veridicom International, Inc. and will be retained by Veridicom
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





                                     32.1-1
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)


I, James M. DeCosmo, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Forestar Group Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





/s/ James M. DeCosmoJames M. DeCosmoChief Executive Officer


Date: August 16, 2013
Maurice Devell ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-5245

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6656

JASON ALEXANDER PULLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-01465-AJT-TRJ)

Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: October 1, 2014

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Alexander Pulley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jason Alexander Pulley seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition and denying reconsideration. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Pulley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2018

p0103 

# Order

Clerk January 5, 2018

156877

In re A. L. HENDERSON, Minor. SC: 156877

COA: 336561

Leelanau CC Family Division:

15

- 009455

- NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 14, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2018167EN.01003603.xml

| 4.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 167/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 167/36

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 131 of 29 May 2018
  )

On page 19, the Annex (concerning amendments to Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP), entry No 68 (concerning Bassam Sabbagh) is deleted.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

CITY OF NATIONAL CITY; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

NATIONAL CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT,

Defendant. No. 21

- 56062

D.C. No. 3:19

- cv

- 01360

- LAB

- MSB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 18, 2023 * *

Before: GRABER, PAEZ, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Keith Wayne Sekerke appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 26 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 56062

dismiss ing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deprivation of property in violation

of the Fourteenth Amendment

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Watison v. Carter , 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); Resnick v. Hayes , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.

2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Sekerke ’s action because Sekerke

failed to allege facts sufficient to show that a meaningful post

- deprivation remedy

was unavailable to him. See Hudson v. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517, 531

- 33 (1984 )

(neither negligent nor intentional deprivations of property constitute a due process

violation if a meaningful post

- deprivation remedy is available); Barnett v. Centoni

,

31 F.3d 813, 816

- 17 (9th Cir. 1994) ( “California [l]aw provides an adequate post

dep rivation remedy for any property deprivations.”).

We reject as unpersuasive Sekerke’s contention that he may not have a

meaningful post

- deprivation remedy based on the hypothetical application of

unspecified state law immunity.

We do not consider Seke rke’s Fourth Amendment claim because S e kerke

failed to replead it in his operative complaint. See Lacey v. Maricopa County , 693

F.3d 896, 928 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc) (claims dismissed with leave to amend are

waived if not repled).

We do not consider mat ters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued3 21

- 56062

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Appellees’ motion for judicial notice (Docket Entr y No. 23) is granted. All

other requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W. Mobley, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Paul W. Mobley
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 of Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                                 Date: