alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL TOTAL TIME (mins):

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MINUTE ORDER

DEPUTY CLERK REPORTER/FTR

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATE NEW CASE CASE NUMBER

APPEARANCES

DEFENDANT AGE CUST P/NP ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT PD. RET.

APPT.

U.S. ATTORNEY INTERPRETER FIN. AFFT

SUBMITTED 

COUNSEL APPT'D 

PROBATION OFFICER PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER DEF ELIGIBLE FOR

APPT'D COUNSEL 

PARTIAL PAYMENT 

OF CJA FEES 

PROCEEDINGS SCHEDULED TO OCCUR

INITIAL APPEAR PRELIM HRG MOTION JUGM'T & SENTG STATUS

TRIAL SET 

I.D. COUNSEL ARRAIGNMENT BOND HEARING IA REV PROB. or

 or S/R

OTHER

DETENTION HRG ID / REMOV HRG CHANGE PLEA PROB. REVOC. ATTY APPT 

HEARING

INITIAL APPEARANCE

ADVISED

OF RIGHTS

ADVISED

OF CHARGES

NAME AS CHARGED

IS TRUE NAME

TRUE NAME:

ARRAIGNMENT

ARRAIGNED ON

INFORMATION

ARRAIGNED ON

INDICTMENT

READING WAIVED

SUBSTANCE

WAIVER OF INDICTMENT FILED

RELEASE

RELEASED

ON O/R

ISSUED

APPEARANCE BOND

AMT OF SECURITY SPECIAL NOTES PASSPORT

SURRENDERED

DATE: 

$

PROPERTY TO BE POSTED CORPORATE SECURITY REAL PROPERTY:

CASH $

MOTION

FOR

DETENTION

PRETRIAL

SERVICES

REPORT

DETAINED RELEASED DETENTION HEARING

AND FORMAL FINDINGS

WAIVED

REMANDED

TO CUSTODY

ORDER REMOVED TO THE DISTRICT OF 

PLEA

CONSENT

ENTERED

NOT GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY TO COUNTS:

PRESENTENCE

REPORT ORDERED

CHANGE OF PLEA PLEA AGREEMENT

FILED

OTHER:

CONTINUANCE

 TO: ATTY APPT

HEARING

BOND

HEARING

STATUS RE:

CONSENT TRIAL SET

 AT: SUBMIT FINAN.

AFFIDAVIT

PRELIMINARY

HEARING

_____________

ARRAIGNMENT

CHANGE OF

PLEA

STATUS

BEFORE HON. DETENTION

HEARING

 MOTIONS JUDGMENT &

SENTENCING

TIME WAIVED TIME EXCLUDABLE 

UNDER 18 § USC

3161

IDENTITY /

REMOVAL

HEARING

PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE

PROB/SUP REV.

HEARING

ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS

DOCUMENT NUMBER:

Case 5:17-cr-00069-BLF Document 6 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of Liberty Silver Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Manish Z. Kshatriya, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Manish Z. Kshatriya
Chief Executive Officer Date: September ­­28, 2015
#### Jaco Hendrik OOSTHUIZEN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General; et al., Respondents—Appellees.

No. 03-56541.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 22, 2004.*

Decided April 26, 2004.

Jaco Hendrik Oosthuizen, San Ysidro, CA, pro se.

Karen Hewitt, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*495MEMORANDUM **

Jaco Hendrik Oosthuizen, a native and citizen of South Africa, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, we review de novo, *see Tripati v. Henman,*843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.1988) and we affirm.

In his habeas corpus petition, Oosthuizen asserts numerous constitutional challenges to his removal proceedings. However, the district court correctly held that none of Oosthuizen’s challenges state a basis for habeas corpus relief. For this reason, Oosthuizen’s petition must fail. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2241; *James v. Borg,*24 F.3d 20, 26 (9th Cir.1994) (“Conclusory allegations which are not supported by a statement of specific facts do not warrant habeas relief.”)

Additionally, the district court properly concluded that, to the extent Oosthuizen is challenging the Immigration Judge’s removal order, habeas review is not the proper procedure. *See Taniguchi v. Schultz,*303 F.3d 950, 955 (9th Cir.2002) (noting that statutory remedies must be pursued before filing an appeal in federal court); *see also*8 U.S.C. § 1252(d).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Scottie ROBINSON, petitioner, v. Wayne C. McCABE, Warden, et al.

No. 12-9875.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10937]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Snowbird Mineral Withdrawal, Lolo National Forest, Mineral 
County, MT

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, proposes 
to withdraw 160 acres of National Forest System lands for 30 years to 
allow for public recreational crystal and mineral collection. From the 
date of the withdrawal, these lands would be closed to location and 
entry under the mining laws for the next 30 years.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received 
in writing by May 15, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to the Ninemile Ranger District, 20325 
Ninemile Road, Huson, MT, 49846.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lisa Stoeffler, 406-626-5201.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 29, 1993, the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture filed an application to withdraw the following described 
National Forest System land from location and mineral entry under the 
United States mining laws, subject to valid existing rights:

Principle Meridian, Montana

T. 12 N., 25 W., (Unsurveyed)
    Sec. 19, SW\1/4\.

    The area described contains 160 acres in Mineral County.

    The Forest Service is preparing an Environmental Analysis to in 
order to make a recommendation for the withdrawal of these lands for 30 
years.
    The purpose of the 30 year withdrawal is to provide the opportunity 
for the public to use the site as a recreational mineral and crystal 
collecting area. The Forest Service will undertake an analysis to 
determine the existing and potential demand for the land and its 
resources.
    The public is invited to comment, in writing, on this proposal

    Dated: April 3, 1995
Robert P. Meuchel,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 95-10937 Filed 5-3-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vision Industries Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2008. The undersigned certify that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such  Amended 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of December 31, 2008. This Certification is executed as of December 4, 2009. By:/s/ MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)  By:/s/ LAWRENCE WEISDORNLawrence Weisdorn
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2017337EN.01001601.xml

| 19.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/16

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/2363

of 6 December 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Μελεκούνι’ (Melekouni) (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece's application to register the name ‘Μελεκούνι’ (Melekouni) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece's application to register the name ‘Μελεκούνι’ (Melekouni) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Μελεκούνι’ (Melekouni) should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Μελεκούνι’ (Melekouni) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Μελεκούνι’ (Melekouni) (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.3. Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits or other baker's wares as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 280, 24.8.2017, p. 7.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
15*f3-/¥

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 02-12-00178-CR OFFENSE: OTHER CRIMINAL

Russell Jay Reger v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Tarrant

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: Criminal District Court No. 3

DATE: 09/18/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 0579930D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Russell Jay Reger v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

?Ro se

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: 0i/*£/*f/r

JUDGE: fJkUoLu6r—

Petition

CCA#: J5¥3-/¥

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
# L_2018098EN.01001901.xml

| 18.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 98/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 98/19

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/585

of 12 April 2018

appointing a member, proposed by the Republic of Austria, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Heinz SCHADEN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Heinz SCHADEN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Matthias STADLER, Bürgermeister der Stadt St. Pölten. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Matthias STADLER, Bürgermeister der Stadt St. Pölten.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 12 April 2018.

For the Council

The President

T. DONCHEV

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

---
#### SCHLEICHER COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER INC., Appellant, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Appellee.

No. 03-1371.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 4, 2004.

Jane W. Vanneman, Principal Attorney, David M. Cohen, of Counsel, William Robinson, of Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Gilbert J. Ginsburg, Principal Attorney, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

Before CLEVENGER, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
FAX (303) 623-4258621
      SEVENTEENTH STREET
                SUITE
      1550
                DENVER,
      COLORADO 80293
                TELEPHONE
      (303) 623-9147
 
 
 Exhibit
23.1
 
 
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
  
 As
independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the
reference of our name in the Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December
31, 2008 of Rockies Region 2007 Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”), We have
no interest of a substantial or material nature in the Partnership, or in any
affiliate. We have not been employed on a contingent basis, and we are not
connected with the Partnership, or any affiliate as a promoter, underwriter,
voting trustee, director, officer, employee or affiliate.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
      RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L PRYDER
      SCOTT COMPANY, L P
 
 Denver,
Colorado
 March 30,
2009
 
 
 
 
 1100
      LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800
                HOUSTON,
      TX 77002-5218
                TEL
      (713 651-9191
                FAX
      (713) 651-08491100
      530-8TH
      STREET, S.W.
                CALGARY,
      ALBERTA T2P 2W2
                TEL
      (403) 262-2799
                FAX
      (403) 262-2790
Hunter COAN v. STATE

CR-16-0899

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 4952** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JAMES THOMAS MCBRIDE, a/k/a JT, a/k/a Jaemes Thomas McBride, a/k/a Jim McBride , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Anthony J
. Trenga , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr - 00175

- AJT

- 1 )

Submitted : November 13, 2015 Decided: November 18, 2015

Before DUNCAN and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jeffrey D. Zimmerman, SMITH & ZIMMERMAN, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, William E. Johnston, Special Assistan t United States Attorney, Kosta S. Stojilkovic, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Thomas McBride appeals his 42

- month sentence follo wing his convictions for one count of conspiring to produce false identification documents and causing the impersonation of diplomats , in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012) ; one count of causing the impersonation of a diplomat , in violation of 18
U.S.C. § § 915, 2 (2012) ; and four counts of producing false identification documents , in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1028(a)(1), 2 (2012)
. Finding no error, we affirm. McBride raises only one issue on appeal, arguing that the district court erred in applying an en hancement for use of an authentication feature pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B1.1(b)(11)(A)(ii) (2014) . When evaluating Guidelines calculations, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions d e novo. United
States v. Cox , 744 F.3d 305, 308 (4th Cir. 2014). McBride argues that, b ecause the identification cards issued by Divine Province did not appear to be issued by the State Department, the sentencing enhancement does not apply. We reject th is argument and conclude that the verification system used by McBride was designed to mimic the one used to verify genuine diplomatic immunity cards issued by the State Department. Further, the false authentication feature produced by McBride and the acco mpanying identification card s w ere3 designed to appear as if they were issued by “an international government or quasi

- governmental organization.” 18 U.S.C.
§ 1028(d)(6) (2012) (defining “issuing authority”); see United States v. Sardariani , 754 F.3d 1118, 1121 (9th Cir. 2014)
. Because McBride’s offense involved “the possession or use of any . . . authentication feature,” USSG § 2B1.1(b)(11)(A)(ii), we find no error and uphold the district court’s application of the enhancement. Accordingly, we affirm the criminal judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately expre ssed in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
ITEM 6. (A)

                                    EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR EARNINGS PER SHARE)

                                           QUARTER ENDED       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                            SEPTEMBER 30,        SEPTEMBER 30,
                                       ----------------------  ------------------
                                         1998        1997        1998      1997
                                       --------  ------------  --------  --------
<S>                                    <C>       <C>           <C>       <C>
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $  5,786  $      6,335  $ 17,769  $ 16,037
Less:  Preferred stock dividend . . .        44            43       128       129
                                       --------  ------------  --------  --------
Net income applicable to common stock  $  5,742  $      6,292  $ 17,641  $ 15,908

Weighted average common shares
outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . .   926,579       929,222   928,216   929,222

Earnings per common share . . . . . .  $   6.20  $      $6.77  $  19.01  $  17.12
</TABLE>
Alejandro ROSALES, petitioner, v. D. DAVEY, Warden.

No. 12-9694.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 663 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 663

 Honoring the memory of the victims of the heinous attack at the Pulse 
                      nightclub on June 12, 2016.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 7), 2022

    Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mr. Rubio) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the memory of the victims of the heinous attack at the Pulse 
                      nightclub on June 12, 2016.

Whereas, on June 12, 2016, a gunman inspired by the Islamic State of Iraq and 
        Syria targeted the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, where he killed 
        49 innocent victims and wounded dozens more in a despicable attack;
Whereas the attack at the Pulse nightclub was an attack on the LGBTQ community, 
        the Hispanic community, the City of Orlando, the State of Florida, and 
        the United States;
Whereas the Orlando community continues to mourn the tragic loss of life but has 
        demonstrated remarkable strength, unity, and resilience in the aftermath 
        of the horrendous event;
Whereas June 12 is designated as ``Pulse Remembrance Day'' in the State of 
        Florida to honor the victims and survivors of the senseless attack;
Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for those affected by 
        the tragedy; and
Whereas June 12, 2022, marks 6 years since the lives of the 49 innocent victims 
        were tragically cut short by this senseless act of terrorism: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates the 49 innocent victims killed in the 
        attack at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, on June 12, 
        2016, and offers heartfelt condolences to the families, loved 
        ones, and friends of the victims;
            (2) honors the dozens of survivors of the attack and 
        pledges continued resolve to stand against terrorism and hate; 
        and
            (3) expresses gratitude to the brave law enforcement and 
        emergency medical personnel who responded to the attack.
                                 <all>
```
Oui SAYTHANOM, DOC #R30209, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3898

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Lukas Braunschweiler, Chief Executive
Officer of Dionex Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1.
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, and to
which this Certification is attached (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By: /s/ Lukas Braunschweiler
Name: Lukas Braunschweiler
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date: May 9, 2005