alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michelle WALKER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NOS. 5D19-1912 5D19-1913 5D19-1914 5D19-1941

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed July 25, 2019

Steve Wolverton, of Gutin & Wolverton, Cocoa, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Kaylee Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the May 23, 2019 judgments and sentences imposed in Case Nos. 2011-CF-59401, 2012-CF-031725, 2012-CF-59603, and 2018-CF-30534-B, in the Circuit Court in and for Brevard County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Patrick Ryan BRAY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2210

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Marlon INMON, DOC #992677, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4855

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10890]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Use of NUMARC/EPRI Report TR-102348 for Analog-to-Digital 
Replacements; Issued

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued Generic 
Letter 95-02 on informing licensees for reactors of the NRC staff's new 
position on the use of Nuclear Management and Resource Council/Electric 
Power Research Institute (NUMARC/EPRI) Report TR-102348, ``Guideline on 
Licensing Digital Upgrades,'' dated December 1993, as acceptable 
guidance for determining when an analog-to-digital replacement can be 
performed without prior NRC staff approval under the requirements of 
Sec. 50.59 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This generic 
letter is available in the Public Document Rooms under accession number 
9504140227. The resolution of public comments received on this generic 
letter is discussed in a memorandum which is also available in the 
Public Document Rooms under accession number 9504260141.

DATES: The generic letter was issued on April 26, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Not applicable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul J. Loeser at (301) 415-2825.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of April, 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Boen-Dar Liaw,
Acting Director, Division of Project Support, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-10890 Filed 5-2-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Donnis T. FOSTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1538

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

U.S. District Court Case No. 4:17-cv-00642-YGR 

Eugene B. Elliot, State Bar No. 111475 

Michael C. Wenzel, State Bar No. 215388 

Amy Leifur Halby, State Bar No. 287216 

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL 

The Waterfront Building 

2749 Hyde Street 

San Francisco, California 94109 

Telephone: (415) 353-0999 

Facsimile: (415) 353-0990 

Email: eelliot@bfesf.com 

mwenzel@bfesf.com 

Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff 

NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RICK R. TUCKER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; 

SHALEE CUNNINGHAM; and DOES 1 

through 20, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:17-cv-00642-YGR 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 

NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Third-party Plaintiff, 

v. 

NOVATO COMMUNITY TELEVISION; and 

ROES 1 through 20,

Third-Party Defendants. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through themselves and their respective 

undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to all 

// 

// 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

U.S. District Court Case No. 4:17-cv-00642-YGR 

defendants, including third-party defendants, each side to bear its/his own fees and costs, pursuant to 

FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: May 15, 2018 JARET & JARET 

 By: /s/ Robert Jaret

Phillip A. Jaret 

Robert S. Jaret 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 RICK R. TUCKER 

Dated: May 15, 2018 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL 

By: /s/ Michael C. Wenzel

 Michael C. Wenzel 

Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff 

NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 

Dated: May 15, 2018 JENNER & BLOCK, LLP 

By: /s/ Christopher J. Rillo

Christopher J. Rillo 

 Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant 

NOVATO COMMUNITY TELEVISION
Rolando RAMIREZ, aka Roland Ramirez, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10226.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
William THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0118

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Nastasha HART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3339

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.10


Consent of Independent Auditors





The Board of Directors


Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.:


We consent to the use of our report dated March 31, 2014, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of KW Stadium Gateway Partners, LLC and subsidiary as of December 31, 2013, the related consolidated statements of operations, members’ capital, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from April 9, 2012 (inception) through December 31, 2012, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements, incorporated by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-174742, No. 333-175002, No. 333-175559, No. 333-184752, and No. 333-192059) on Form S-3, the registration statements (No. 333-164928, No. 333-182269, and No. 333-197492) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-164926) on Form S-1/A and the registration statement (No. 333-186690) on Form S-4 of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent auditors, which report appears in amendment no. 1 to the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10-K of Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.








/s/ KPMG LLP


Los Angeles, California


March 27, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,646,900
<SECURITIES>                                93,053,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,650,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,879,100
<PP&E>                                       5,125,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 302,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             275,401,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,449,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,829,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,040,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               275,401,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,385,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,565,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               232,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,620,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,694,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,106,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,588,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.91
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Middle Kingdom Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert J. Kinloch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of May, 2005.



| | /s/ Robert J. Kinloch                              
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert J. Kinloch                                  
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal American FinancialCorp. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Richard A. Barasch, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Robert A.Waegelein, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: August 9, 2007  | /s/ RICHARD A.  BARASCH |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                       | Richard A. Barasch      |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: August 9,  2007 | /s/ ROBERT A. WAEGELEIN |
|                       | Robert A. Waegelein     |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer |

 

*A signed originalof this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Thiscertification is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theRegistrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling.*

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          27,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,129,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                   114,484
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,562,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,111,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                     911,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,562,213
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               321,697
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,369
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,244
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and GEICO General Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Ricardo PEREZ and Luz Perez, etc., Appellees.

Nos. 3D18-208 3D18-629

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019

Shutts & Bowen LLP, and Suzanne Youmans Labrit, B.C.S. (Tampa) and Amy M. Wessel (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants.

The Powell Law Firm, P.A., and Brett C. Powell ; Silverstein, Silverstein & Silverstein, P.A., for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ.

*CONFESSION OF ERROR*

HENDON, J.

*1132As the appellees properly concede, the attorney's fees and costs judgments at issue in these consolidated appeals must be reversed. In *GEICO Indemnity Co. v. Perez*, 260 So.3d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018), this Court reversed the underlying final judgment as to uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage and remanded for a new trial. Therefore, the attorney's fees and costs judgments that were predicated on the reversed final judgment cannot stand. *See**City of Hollywood v. Witt*, 939 So.2d 315, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (recognizing that "where an award of attorney's fees is dependent upon the judgment obtained, the reversal of the underlying judgment necessitates the reversal of the fee award"); *Marty v. Bainter*, 727 So.2d 1124, 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) ("Once a final judgment is reversed and remanded by an appellate court, there can be no prevailing party for purposes of an award of prevailing party attorney's fees. Consequently, an award of attorney's fees and costs predicated on a reversed or vacated final judgment also must be reversed").

Reversed.
Elaine Wilcox-Cook

Data Analyst

September 23, 2019

Python-pptx

Programmatically creating slide decks
Python-pptx

 Package in Python that allows for the 

programmatic creation of slide decks

 Creates slides using slide layouts in a slide 

master

 This presentation was created entirely 

using a slide master and python-pptx
Why use Python-pptx?

 Excellent tool for automated creation of 

repetitive slides with similar formatting (e.g. 25 

slides of bar charts)

 Create multiple slide decks with no scale-up (e.g. 

focus group results from different sites)

 Easily update slide decks that must be created 

every year (e.g. longitudinal research)

 Edit formatting automatically when changes need 

to be made (e.g. change the data labels for all bar 

charts in presentation)
Creating content

 Layouts are imported from the slide master of an 

existing PowerPoint presentation.

If no PowerPoint presentation is specified, the 

package supplies a default layout

 Layouts contain placeholders that may be preformatted to a certain degree in the slide master. You

can insert content directly into a placeholder.

 Alternately, content can be inserted into a slide 

without placeholders, but this presentation will not

cover that.
Creating content (continued)

 Placeholder types include:

Textboxes (such as this)

Charts

Images

Tables

And more

 This presentation will only deal with textboxes, 

charts, images, and tables
An unpopulated slide with placeholders present
That same slide, populated

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1 2 3 4 5
Tables

Person Vanilla Chocolate Mint Strawberry

Jamal l l l

Elise l l l

Anthony l l l

Miriam l l l

Betsy l l l

Tables are more complicated to add, since 

they must be populated cell by cell

l = 1st

l = 2nd

l = 3rd
Images
Text

 Textbox content is split into two categories: Paragraphs and 

Runs

 A paragraph is all the text contained before a line break, which 

is created by inserting a new paragraph. A paragraph is made 

up of runs. A text box always has at least one paragraph, and a 

paragraph always has at least one run.

 A paragraph can consist of a single run, or multiple runs. Runs allow 

the user to vary formatting within a paragraph, a sentence, or 

even a word.
Pros/Cons of Python-pptx

• Good for automation

• Simple, easy to learn

• Flexible

• Not good with static 

slides

• Just can't do some 

things

Pros Cons
Mark SHORES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9963.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EX-35.2
(logo) CWCapital

CWCapitalLLC as Subservicer
Officer's Certificate



RE: Securitization Series Cobalt 2007-C3 - August 1, 2007


To Whom It May Concern:

With regard to the loans sub-serviced by CWCapital in the captioned
transaction, please be advised of the following:

     i.) A review of the activities of CWCapital  during the preceding  calendar
year (ended  2007) and of its  performance,  under the  Sub-Servicing  Agreement
dated August 1, 2007 has been made under my supervision.

     ii.) To the best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  CWCapital  has
fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Sub-Servicing  Agreement  in all
material respects throughout such year.



By: CWCapital LLC

By: /s/ Gardner P. Hall
Gardner P. Hall
Senior Vice President



One Charles River Place  63 Kendrick Street, Needham, MA 02494
781.707.9300 main  781.707.9471 fax  www.cwcapital.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________

)

OLIVER J. HIGGINS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1485 (RLW)

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT )

OF JUSTICE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The defendants filed a renewed motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 36] on March 

21, 2013. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligation under the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned the 

plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by April 26, 2013, the Court would treat the 

motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested more 

time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will treat the defendants’ motion as conceded. 

With this ruling, no issues remain for the Court’s resolution, and final judgment will be 

entered in favor of the defendants. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: May 14, 2013

ROBERT L. WILKINS

United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10301]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Casualty)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. 817(d)) and 
the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 CFR 
Part 540, as amended:

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and G.I.E. Cruise Vision Two, 1050 
Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132-2096

Vessel: SPLENDOUR OF THE SEAS

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10301 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly
      Henderson ,
      as
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(3)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(4)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




Date: May
      6,
      2008




/s/
                Molly HendersonMolly
                HendersonChief
                Financial Officer and Vice President of
                Finance





This
      Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.