alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO GARCIA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TESORO REFINING & MARKETING 

COMPANY LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00123-JST 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED 

REQUEST TO EXTEND MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

DEADLINE

Re: ECF No. 79

The Court has received and considered the parties’ stipulation to extend the deadline to file 

a motion for preliminary approval from February 13, 2019 to March 13, 2019, and to continue the 

hearing on the motion from April 4, 2019 to April 18, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. ECF No. 79. 

The Court observes that it has already extended this deadline and rescheduled the 

associated hearing once pursuant to the parties’ earlier stipulation. ECF No. 78. The Court hereby 

GRANTS the stipulated request for an additional extension but notes that it is unlikely to grant 

any further request to extend this deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 14, 2019

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,788,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                   113,396
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,152,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      4,717,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                     891,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,152,607
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,987
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,461
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,012
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,084
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00997-CR

ABEL ALFRED MCVAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 185th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. 1372812).

TO THE 185TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 13th day of November 2014, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on November 8, 2013. After submitting the 

case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised 

by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment 

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
Judgment rendered November 13, 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown. Opinion

delivered by Justice Higley.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

March 20, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Exhibit 10.17


 


FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”)
is made and entered into by and between Cano Petroleum, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices in Fort Worth, Texas
(the “Company”), and Patrick M. McKinney,
an individual currently residing in Tarrant County, Texas (“Senior Vice
President”), effective as of the 31st day of
December, 2008 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Senior Vice President entered into
that certain Employment Agreement dated June 1, 2006, as amended by the
First Amendment to Employment Agreement effective November 9, 2006; Second
Amendment to Employment Agreement effective June 29, 2007; and Third
Amendment to Employment Agreement effective May 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Senior Vice President desire to
amend, alter, modify, and change the provisions of the Agreement to bring the
provisions into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
benefits to be obtained hereunder and other good and valuation consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and confessed, the
Company and Senior Vice President do hereby agree to amend, alter, modify and
change the Agreement, as of the Amendment Effective Date as follows:


 


1.                                      Section 12
of the Agreement is hereby adding the following new sentence at the end of the
first paragraph of said Section:


 


Subject
to Section 18 below, all payments made pursuant to this Section 12
shall be paid in a single lump sum within ten (10) days following Senior
Vice President’s termination of employment, and any provision of in-kind
benefits hereunder shall not affect the in-kind benefits provided in any other
taxable year.


 


Except as specifically
amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect as originally
written.


 


Signatures


 


To
evidence the binding effect of the covenants and agreements described above,
the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first
written above.


 


	
   

  	
  THE
  COMPANY

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  CANO
  PETROLEUM, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
        /s/
  S. Jeffrey Johnson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  S.
  Jeffrey Johnson, Chairman and CEO

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  SENIOR
  VICE PRESIDENT:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
        /s/
  Patrick M. McKinney

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Patrick
  M. McKinney
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Craig A.
McCollam, the Chief Financial Officer of Dionex Corporation (the Company),
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 3. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 4. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.                                                                                                                            



By:
    
    /s/ Craig A. McCollamName:
    
    Craig A. McCollamTitle:
    
    Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDated:
    
    October 31, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1102]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP93-106-009]


Texas Gas Transmission Corp.; Notice of Filing of Refund Report

January 11, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 27, 1994, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas), filed a refund report of the amount of refunds 
made to its jurisdictional customers for the period November 1, 1993 
through September 30, 1994.
    Texas Gas states the refunds were made in accordance with the 
provisions of Article II of the Stipulation and Agreement in Texas Gas' 
Docket No. RP93-106. The refunds total $42,210,133.42 comprising 
$40,232,108.69 principal and $1,978,024.73 interest.
    Texas Gas states the refund checks were mailed on December 20, 
1994, together with transmittal letters and schedules.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests should be filed on or before January 19, 1995. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this application are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-1102 Filed 1-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Sandra P. GANDY, petitioner, v. J. Harrell REID, Sheriff, Hamilton County, Florida.

No. 12-9950.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 137141 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 137141 COA: 286109 Kent CC: 03-002380-FH DAVID RONALD ECKMYRE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 14, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11864

 

 

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS6 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 40 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 3Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 40 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 3Case 3:05-cv-01967-CRB Document 40 Filed 08/03/06 Page 3 of 3
Nicole DUBUCLET v. Skilar PIERRE

NO. 2019-CJ-0861

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21222-21223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10627]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-30,788]

Meridian Oil-Houston Region; Houston, TX; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    With other locations in the following states, TA-W-30,788A  
Texas, TA-W-30,788B  Alabama, TA-W-30,788C  Louisiana, TA-W-30,788D  
Ohio, TA-W-30,788E  Oklahoma, and Meridian Oil Corporate and 
Administrative Offices, TA-W-30,788F  Houston, TX, TA-W-30,788G  
Fort Worth, TX.

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 23, 1995, applicable to 
all workers of the subject firm. [[Page 21223]] 
    The Notice was published in the Federal Register on April 10, 1995 
(60 FR 18146).
    At the request of the workers, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The investigation 
findings show that workers at the corporate office of Meridian Oil in 
Houston, Texas and in Fort Worth, Texas should be covered under the 
subject certification. The Houston Region accounted for a significant 
share of the business at the corporate and administrative offices of 
Meridian Oil. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification 
to properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,788 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of the Houston Region of Meridian Oil in Houston, 
Texas and in other locations in Texas, Alabama, Louisiana, Ohio and 
Oklahoma and in the corporate offices of Meridian Oil in Houston, 
Texas and in the administrative office in Forth Worth, Texas who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
February 20, 1994 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, D.C., this 20th day of April, 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-10627 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
October 8, 2019

CHRISTINA SPIROPOULOU, Ph.D., 

TEAM LEAD, MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS AND THERAPEUTICS

VIRAL SPECIAL PATHOGENS BRANCH 

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) 

1600 CLIFTON RD. NE, 

ATLANTA, GA 30333, US

Re: EUA140007/A006

Trade/Device Name: CDC Ebola Virus VP40 Real-time RT-PCR Assay

Dated: August 13, 2019

Received: August 16, 2019

Dear Dr. Spiropoulou:

This is to notify you that your request to modify the Healthcare Provider and Patient Fact Sheets for the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Ebola Virus VP40 Real-time RT-PCR Assay that reflect changes to the CDC 

testing algorithm and updated epidemiological information concerning Ebola virus disease (EBV) has been granted.

By submitting this amendment for review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), you have complied with the 

Conditions of Authorization stated in the letter authorizing the emergency use of the CDC Ebola Virus VP40 Realtime RT-PCR Assay issued on March 2, 2015.

Sincerely yours,

Uwe Scherf, M.Sc., Ph.D.

Director

Division of Microbiology Devices

Office of In Vitro Diagnostics

 and Radiological Health

Center for Devices and Radiological Health
# L_2018087DE.01001601.xml

| 3.4.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 87/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 87/16

---

Berichtigung des Durchführungsbeschlusses (EU) 2018/170 der Kommission vom 2. Februar 2018 über einheitliche detaillierte Spezifikationen für die Datenerhebung und -analyse zur Überwachung und Bewertung der Funktionsweise des EURES-Netzes

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 31 vom 3. Februar 2018
  )

Auf Seite 109, Anhang, Ziffer I Nummer 1 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 109, Anhang, Ziffer I Nummer 2 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 109, Anhang, Ziffer I Nummer 3 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 110, Anhang, Ziffer I Nummer 4 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 110, Anhang, Ziffer II Nummer 1 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 111, Anhang, Ziffer II Nummer 3 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 112, Anhang, Ziffer II Nummer 6 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 112, Anhang, Ziffer II Nummer 7 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 112, Anhang, Ziffer II Nummer 8 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 112, Anhang, Ziffer II Nummer 9 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

Auf Seite 112, Anhang, Ziffer II Nummer 10 vierter Gedankenstrich:

Anstatt:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: zweijährlich.“

muss es heißen:

„
  Zeitraum der Datenerfassung: halbjährlich.“

---
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Roman's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Mobley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/ Paul W. Mobley
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Paul W. Mobley
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer of
                                              Noble Roman's, Inc.

                                              Date:
BRIAN HOLLOWAY INVESTMENTS, LLC., Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association, on Behalf of the Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-He11, Asset-Backed Certificates, et al. , Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-2600

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------

                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2007-HY5
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HY5


     The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                        Dated: March 14, 2008
----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance