alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), Thomas E.
Hales, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven T. Sabatini, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of his knowledge that:

        (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/Thomas E. Hales                             Date: May 13, 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas E. Hales
Chief Executive Officer



/s/Steven T. Sabatini                          Date: May 13, 2003
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven T. Sabatini
Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20675-20676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10278]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Title; Applicable Form; and OMB Control Number: Export Controlled DoD 
Technical Data Agreement; DD Form 2345; OMB Control Number 0704-0207.
Type of Request: Reinstatement.
Number of Respondents: 6,000.
Responses Per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 6,000.
Average Burden Per Response: 20 minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 2,000.
Needs and Uses: The information collected hereby, is used to determine 
and certify the eligibility of U.S. and Canadian defense contractors to 
obtain export-controlled data with military or space application, while 
preserving the requirements of the U.S. for export licenses where 
appropriate. Department of Defense Directive 5230.25, ``Withholding of 
Unclassified Technical Data from Public Disclosure,'' requires 
[[Page 20676]] submission of DD Form 2345, ``Militarily Critical 
Technical Data Agreement,'' for approval. This form also provides 
evidence to the U.S. and Canadian Defense Agencies that the contractor 
has in fact been certified to receive such critical technical data.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit; Non-profit 
institutions; and Small businesses or organizations.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.

    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.

    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-10278 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6050

FRANK VIGIL, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN WALRACH, Assistant Warden; WALTER SWEENY, Unit Manager 

B-Building; RANDALL MATHENA, Superintendent and former 

Warden of ROSP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District 

Judge. (7:15-cv-00063-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: August 31, 2016 Decided: September 29, 2016

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Vigil, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Rankin Herring, 

Attorney General, Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frank Vigil, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Vigil v. Walrach, No. 7:15-cv-00063-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. 

Dec. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

O

K

allo

Ino

Re

Rep

all 

Ino

sev

cau

Da

ORIONCLIC

v. 

KELVIN INO

On Mar

owing altern

ocent. (Dkt. 

commendati

port and Rec

On Apr

Defendants 

ocent and Ym

ven (7) days 

use why the 

IT IS S

ated: May 15

K LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

OCENT, et a

Defendants

rch 22, 2017

nate service o

No. 10.) On

ion recomme

commendati

ril 28, 2017, 

in this actio

ma Inocent, 

of this Orde

motion shou

SO ORDER

5, 2017 

UNITED

NORTHER

al., 

s. 

7, Plaintiff O

of the compl

n April 10, 2

ending that t

ion has been

Lawrence G

on. (Dkt. No

filed an answ

er, Plaintiff s

uld not be de

RED. 

D STATES D

RN DISTRIC

OrionClick L

laint and sum

2017, Magis

the motion b

filed. 

G. Townsend

o. 17.) On M

wer to the co

shall either w

enied as moo

___

JEF

Un

DISTRICT C

CT OF CALI

Case No. 1

ORDER T

PLAINTIF

ALTERNA

Re: Dkt. N

LLC (“Plainti

mmons on D

strate Judge J

be granted. (

d, Esq., filed

May 9, 2017, 

omplaint. (D

withdraw its 

ot. 

__________

FFREY S. W

nited States D

COURT 

IFORNIA 

17-cv-00644

TO SHOW C

FF'S MOTI

ATE SERV

No. 10 

iff”) filed a m

Defendants K

James issued

(Dkt. No. 13

d a notice of 

Defendants

Dkt. No. 18.)

motion for a

___________

WHITE 

District Judg

4-JSW 

CAUSE RE

ION FOR 

VICE 

motion seek

Kelvin Inocen

d a Report an

3.) No objec

appearance 

, including K

) According

alternate serv

__________

ge 

E

king an order

nt and Yma 

nd 

ction to the 

on behalf of

Kelvin 

gly, within 

vice or show

________ 

r

f

w
Dwaun Jabbar GUIDRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10020.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Craig A. McCollam, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Dionex Corporation, hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. Dionex Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2007, to which this Certification is attached (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.     By:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Partners Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, James S. Weaver, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                               
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ James S. Weaver           
|                        |  |     |  | James S. Weaver, President and
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuan t to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50978

JOSE A. RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE

CITY OF EL PASO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-97-CV-400-F)

September 4, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judg e, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Housing Authority of the City of El Paso appe als a preliminary

injunction issued herein by the district court. Having considered the briefs and oral

arguments of counsel, and pertinent parts of the record, we now vacate and remand

to the district court for reconsideration, including consideration of the intervening

decision in Maria Luisa Ramirez v. The Housing Authority of the City of El Paso

,

No. 97-50657 (5th Cir., August 31, 1998).
Christopher Lynn HADDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4039

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
FILED IN PD-1 341-1

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

AUSTIN, TEXA

July 27, 2015 Transmitted 7/27/2015 12:00:00 Af

Accepted 7/27/2015 8:13:45 Ar

ABELACOSTA, CLERK ABEL ACOST. IN 1HE CLER

COURT OF COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

No. PD-1341-14

STACY STINE CARY, Appellant

•WftVKfc^" v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Court of Appeals No. 05-12-01421-CR

APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

Appellant Stacy Stine Cary respectfully moves for an extension oftime to

file her Appellant's Brief by until August 14,2015. In support ofthis motion, she

would respectfully show as follows:

1. The deadline for filing the Appellant's Briefis July 27, 2015.

2. Appellant seeks an extension oftime of 18 days, until August 14,

2015.

3. An extension is necessary because of appellate counsel's schedule and

the complexity ofthe issues. Appellant's counsel finished a jury trial in

Greenville, Texas during the week ofJuly 13, 2015, and he has been trying to

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time—Page 1
catch up with other matters since then. Appellant's counsel has a hearing in

federal court in McAllen, Texas on Monday, July 27, 2015 and then is scheduled to

take his eleven-year-old special needs son to Europe and will return on the evening

of August 8, 2015. APPELLEE, THE STATE OF TEXAS, DOES NOT

OPPOSE THIS REQUESTED EXTENSION.

4. No previous extension has been sought or granted.

Respectfully submitted,

Isi John M. Helms

John M. Helms

Texas Bar No. 09401001

BRODEN, MICKELSEN, HELMS &

SNIPES, LLP

2600 State Street

Dallas, Tx 75204

Tel: (469)951-8496

Fax:(214)720-9594

john@johnhelmslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT,

STACY STINE CARY

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Undersigned counsel has conferred with Joseph Corcoran, counsel for

Appellee, the State ofTexas, and the Appellee does not oppose this motion.

/s/ John M. Helms

John M. Helms

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time-Page 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This certifies that a true and correct copy ofthis instrument has been served

on counsel ofrecord on July 25, 2015, as follows:

Joseph Corcoran

Assistant Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

/s/ John M. Helms

John M. Helms

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time—Page 3
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

TXU US Holdings:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU US Holdings Company (US
Holdings) (formerly known as TXU Electric Company) and subsidiaries for the
period ended March 31, 2002, as indicated in our report dated May 9, 2002;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in US
Holding's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-69554, 333-53296,
333-53296-01, 333-53296-02 and 333-53296-03 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




Dallas, Texas
May 15, 2002
Dewayne WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4215

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Larry Bryant NETTLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-150

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CORPORATEFAMILY SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
JANUARY 2, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-2-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-2-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,349,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,240,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (125,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,797,000
<PP&E>                                       4,783,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,190,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,217,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,981,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    24,134,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,327,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,217,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            77,722,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               75,635,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (109,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,194,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,090,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,104,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,104,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
[ O c w e n   L o g o ]  **ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT****PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB**March 7, 2008 RE: CSMC 2007-NC1 OSI For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in Regulation AB, 17 CFR 2291100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my knowledge and belief in all material respects. 1.A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period, and of its performance under the Series Supplement dated as of August 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my supervision. 2.To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris Name: Ronald M. Faris Title: President **Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC****1 6 6 1   W o r t h i n g t o n   R o a d   S u i t e   1 0 0****C e n t r e p a r k   W e s t****West Palm Beach, FL 33409**
Exhibit 35.4

COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

BANCTEC, INC.

DISCOVER CARD MASTER TRUST I

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of BancTec, Inc. (BancTec), pursuant to Services Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2008 (as amended, restated, supplement or
otherwise modified as of the date hereof, the Services Agreement) by and between DB Servicing Corporation (assignee of DFS Services LLC) and BancTec, Inc., hereby certifies that:



| | (a) | a review of the activities of BancTec, during the period from December 1, 2011 to November 30, 2012, and of its performance under the Services Agreement was
made under my supervision; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, BancTec has fulfilled all its obligations in all material respects under the Services Agreement throughout the period
from December 1, 2011 to November 30, 2012.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed
this certificate this 20th day of February, 2013.



By:

/s/ Maria L. AllenName: Maria L. AllenTitle: Sr. Vice President andPresident, Americas
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141890 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141890 

 COA: 291664 

Jackson CC: 07-003911-FH 

TERRAL WINDMON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Todd Lee HAMITER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2089

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Companies.
 /s/ Erik Olsson

Erik OlssonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 18, 2010/s/ David Mathieson

David MathiesonSenior Vice President, and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 18, 2010
Charles H. GUY, IV, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; the Unknown Spouse of Charles H. Guy, IV; any and all Unknown Parties Claiming by, Through, Under, and Against the Herein Named Individual Defendant(s) who are not Known to be Dead or Alive, Whether Said Unknown Parties may Claim an Interest as Spouses, Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, or Other Claimants; Tenant #1; Tenant #2; Tenant #3; and Tenant #4 the Names Being Fictitious to Account for Parties in Possession, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-5012

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 19, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.