alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 21243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10736]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Agency Meeting
    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
May 1, 1995.
    A closed meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 3, 1995, at 10:00 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(4), 
(8), (9)(i) and 10, permit consideration of the scheduled matters at a 
closed meeting.
    Commissioner Roberts, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
May 3, 1995, at 10:00 a.m., will be:

    Institution of injunctive actions.
    Settlement of injunctive actions.
    Institution of administrative proceedings of an enforcement 
nature.
    Settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement 
nature.
    Regulatory matter regarding financial institutions.
    Opinion.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: April 27, 1995.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10736 Filed 4-27-95; 12:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D.C., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VALENTINO WALKER,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00719-MEJ 

ORDER RE: CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Re: Dkt. No. 3

Civil Local Rule 3-11 (Failure to Notify of Address Change) imposes on litigants, 

including parties proceeding pro se, “whose address changes while an action is pending” to 

“promptly file with the Court . . . a Notice of Change of Address specifying the new address.” On 

October 31, 2017, the Court filed and served upon all Plaintiffs an Order to Show Cause why the 

case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. OSC, Dkt. No. 32; see Dkt. No. 32-1 (Proof 

of Service). On November 13, 2017, each copy of the OSC that was mailed to the non-minor 

Plaintiffs was returned to the Court as undeliverable. Dkt. No. 33. Civil Local Rule 3-11 

empowers the Court to dismiss a complaint without prejudice “when: (1) Mail directed to the 

attorney or pro se party by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable; and (2) The 

Court fails to receive within 60 days of this return a written communication from the attorney or 

pro se party indicating a current address.” As of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs have not 

indicated their current address and have not responded to the OSC. See Dkt.

Because it is apparent Plaintiffs did not receive the OSC, the Court extends the deadline 

for responding to the OSC from November 30, 2017 until January 15, 2018—more than 60 days 

after the OSC was returned as undeliverable.

If Plaintiffs do not indicate their current address(es) and respond to the OSC by 

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 34 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

January 15, 2018, the Court shall dismiss the action without prejudice pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and Local Rule 3-11.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 4, 2017

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:17-cv-00719-HSG Document 34 Filed 12/04/17 Page 2 of 2
Michael L. BROWN, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3592

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2019

Michael L. Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel; Beverly Brewster and Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Wetherell, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ADOPTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004 of Universal American Financial Corp. (the "Company"), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 10, 2004

                                                       /s/ Richard A. Barasch
                                                       ----------------------

                                                       Richard A. Barasch
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 800 

Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Mississippi Farm Bureau 

Federation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH (for herself and Mr. WICKER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 17, 2022 

Considered and agreed to with an amended preamble 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Mississippi Farm 

Bureau Federation. 

Whereas the American Farm Bureau was created in 1919 to 

disseminate college research results to farmers; 

Whereas, since 1919, the American Farm Bureau has since 

grown into one of the strongest advocacy organizations in 

the United States, with 6,000,000 members and affiliated 

services and member benefits that include highly respected insurance companies; 

Whereas the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation was officially chartered on October 30, 1922, in Jackson, Mississippi, as a proud state affiliate of the American Farm 

Bureau; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 800 ATS 

Whereas C.L. Neill of Jones County was elected as the first 

president of the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation; 

Whereas the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation is a strong 

voice of agriculture for farmers, ranchers, and rural Mississippians; 

Whereas the mission of the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation is to create an environment in which Mississippi 

farmers, ranchers, and Farm Bureau members can have 

a better life and make a better living; and 

Whereas October 30, 2022, marks the 100th anniversary of 

the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) celebrates October 30, 2022, as the 100th 

3 anniversary of the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federa4 tion; and 

5 (2) commemorates the history, effective advo6 cacy, and contributions to agriculture in Mississippi 

7 of the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-211-2024]

On December 2, 2024, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Cleveland Cuyahoga County Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 40, requesting expansion of Subzone 40I subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 40, on behalf of Swagelok Company, in Solon, Ohio.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (89 FR 96637, December 5, 2024). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 40I to include a new site located at 28000 F.A. Lennon Drive, in Solon (Site 14) was approved on February 5, 2025, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 40's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: February 5, 2025.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-02444 Filed 2-10-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
John MARSHALL, Warden, petitioner, v. Otis Lee RODGERS.

No. 12-382.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for rehearing denied.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanton
C. Heintz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



| | */s/ Stanton C. Heintz*                     
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Stanton C. Heintz                           
| | Chief Financial Officer                     
| | (principal financial and accounting officer)
| | December 15, 2009                           

---
Beulah (Rosita) FARQUHARSON, Appellant, v. Mary Jane ARRINGTON, Osceola County Supervisor of Elections, and as Candidate for Osceola County Supervisor of Elections and Osceola County Commission(ers), Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-1878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00412

- CR

DYLYN REED RICHARDS , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 37254CR

ORDER

Dylyn Reed Richards was convicted of the offense of Intoxication Manslaughter

causing the death of a police officer and was sentenced to 55 years in prison. T EX

.

P ENAL C ODE A NN . §§ 49.08, 49.09(b

- 2) (West 2011). Due to the receipt of counsel’s

motion to withd raw, we abated this appeal on September 4, 2014 to the trial court to

consider whether Richards is still indigent and if so, whether to discharge Richards’

appointed counsel and to appoint new appellate counsel for Richards.Richards v. State Page 2

We have received a supplementa l clerk’s record which includes an order holding

that the previous appointed counsel should be allowed to withdraw and appointing

new counsel for Richards on appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is reinstated, former

counsel’s motion to withdraw is dismissed as moot, and the brief by appellant’s new

counsel is due 30 days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal reinstated Motion dismissed Order issued and filed September 25 , 2014
December 20, 2017 

Dr. Antonio Francesco Di Naro 

Chairman and President 

ADIENNE Pharma & Biotech 

Via Zurigo, 46 

6900 Lugano -SWITZERLAND 

Dear Dr. Francesco Di Naro: 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is pleased to announce that ADIENNE Pharma & Biotech 

has been selected to receive a Drug Shortage Assistance Award for its role in preventing or alleviating drug 

shortages. 

ADIENNE is being recognized for its efforts related to the shortage of thiotepa injection, including 

submitting and obtaining approval of a new drug application for TEPADINA (thiotepa) for injection. 

FDA established this award program to recognize companies for making a substantial contribution to 

preventing or alleviating a drug shortage. FDA hopes this award serves as an incentive for other companies 

to assist in addressing drug shortages, as ADIENNE has. 

FDA intends for the award program to bring attention to manufacturers or companies that assist in 

addressing a drug shortage and prioritize quality manufacturing, a key component of the Strategic Plan for 

Preventing and Mitigating Drug Shortages. More information on the strategic plan is on FDA’s drug 

shortages web page (http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/drugshortages/default.htm). 

FDA thanks ADIENNE for working to alleviate the shortage of thiotepa injection. The enclosed press 

release/web statement template can assist you in publicizing your award. 

Sincerely, 

Douglas C. Throckmorton, M.D. 

Deputy Center Director for Regulatory Programs 

FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 

Enclosures: 

Certificate 

Optional Press Release/Web Statement Template 

U.S. Food & Drug Administration 

10903 New Hampshire Avenue 

Silver Spring, MD 20903 

www.fda.gov
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor

San Jose, California 95110

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — OAKLAND DIVISION

TANESHIA COLLAZO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EQUIFAX, INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 4:17-CV-00416-YGR

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT MID 

AMERICA BANK & TRUST COMPANY

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF 

CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Taneshia Collazo, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Mid America Bank & Trust Company

as to all claims in this action, without prejudice. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

41(a) Voluntary Dismissal 

(1) By the Plaintiff

(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any 

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court 

order by filing: 

(1) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer 

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 33 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT 

or a motion for summary judgment. 

Defendant Mid America Bank & Trust Company has neither answered Plaintiff’s 

Complaint, nor filed a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed 

against it for all purposes and without an Order of the Court. 

Dated: April 19, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C. 

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Taneshia Collazo

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 33 Filed 04/19/17 Page 2 of 2
Geronimo CRUZ, DOC #578556, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4224

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Use un termómetro de alimentos para verificar que la comida ha alcanzado una 

temperatura segura.

145 °F para pescados y mariscos 

145 °F con 3 minutos de reposo para carne de res, cerdo y jamón

160 °F para carne molida, mezclas de carne y platos con huevo 

165 °F para aves, alimentos cocinados en el microondas y sobras recalentadas 

No es seguro comer huevos 

y harina, a menos que estén 

completamente cocidos.

Al usar el microondas, 

asegúrese de girar la comida 

para que se caliente de 

manera uniforme. Siempre 

siga las instrucciones de 

cocción y tiempo de reposo. 

Caliéntelo antes de comerlo Dígale no a la masa

Menéelo No se meta en la boca 

del lobo

Al comer en restaurantes, no 

pida comida que contenga 

huevos, carne, aves, pescado 

o mariscos crudos o 

semicocidos. Si no está seguro, 

pregúntele al mesero.

CONSEJOS BREVES SOBRE 

SEGURIDAD ALIMENTARIA PASO 3: COCINAR

Para obtener más Consejos breves sobre los 

4 pasos para la seguridad alimentaria: 

limpiar, separar, cocinar y enfriar, visite 

www.fda.gov/food

julio de 2018

COCINAR

SEGURIDAD ALIMENTARIA CADA DÍA
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Capmark Financial Group Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), the undersigned
officers of the Company hereby certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 28, 2009

/s/ JAY N. LEVINEName:

Jay N. LevineTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 28, 2009

/s/ GREGORY J. MCMANUSName:

Gregory J. McManusTitle:

Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
EX-33.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015 - 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of
and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Shari Gillund
Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 29, 2008
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-272-CR

EX PARTE MICHAEL JOSEPH BENNETT

	------------

	FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On July 31, 2008, appellant Michael Joseph Bennett filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s refusal to consider his application for writ of habeas corpus seeking an out-of-time petition for discretionary review from this court’s decision in Ex parte Bennett, 245 S.W.3d 616 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth, 2008, pet. dism’d). 

	The court of criminal appeals has granted appellant an out-of-time petition for discretionary review.  Ex parte Bennett, No. AP-76112, 2009 WL 624016, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 11, 2009).   Because the court of criminal appeals granted appellant the relief he sought in his application for writ of habeas corpus, the appeal to this court of the trial court’s refusal to consider the application is moot.  See Jack v. State, 149 S.W.3d 119, 123 n. 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).  Consequently, we dismiss the appeal.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH	

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  April 16, 2009