alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1







Exhibit 10.1



Description of long-term performance incentives under the National Fuel Gas Company Performance
Incentive Program



On December 22, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of National Fuel Gas
Company (the “Company”) approved long-term performance incentives under the National Fuel Gas
Company Performance Incentive Program (the “Program”) for a performance period of October 1, 2008
to September 30, 2011. The Compensation Committee established levels of performance at which 50%,
100%, 150% and 200% of the target incentive will be payable, as described below. For performance
levels between established levels, a portion of the target incentive will be payable as determined
by mathematical interpolation.



The performance condition for the October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2011 performance period is the
Company’s total return on capital as compared to the same metric for peer companies in the Natural
Gas Distribution and Integrated Natural Gas Companies group as calculated and reported in the
Monthly Utility Reports of AUS, Inc., a leading industry consultant (“AUS”). In determining the
Company’s total return on capital for purposes of this comparison, the Compensation Committee will
adjust the AUS calculation of the Company’s total return on capital so as to include any gains
realized by the Company on the sale of operations that were reported under Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles as discontinued operations.



Payment will be made in accordance with the Program if the Company achieves certain levels of
performance relative to the peer group. For example, if the Company achieves a rank, as a
percentile of the peer group, of 60%, then 100% of the target incentive will be paid. Other
performance levels may result in payments ranging from 0% to 200% of the target incentive.



For the October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2011 performance period, the Compensation Committee
approved the following target incentives for the following named executive officers of the Company:
D. F. Smith, $648,000; R. J. Tanski, $375,000; M. D. Cabell, $240,000; A. M. Cellino, $200,000 and
J. R. Pustulka, $105,000.
Justus Cornelius ROSEMOND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-895.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Lincoln Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Pulos, Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln Mining Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date: September 24, 2009 By: /s/ John Pulos John Pulos, Chief Executive Officer
Order entered September 2 6 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00829
- CV
IN RE JEROME JOHNSON, Relator
O rigi nal Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F01
- 53637
- JH



### O RDER Before the Court are relator’s September 19, 2019 pro se motions for judicial notice, to stay the mandamus proceedings with motion to abate, and motion for an abatement of proceedings in th e interest of justice. 1 Relator is represented by counsel in this matter. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Marshall v. State , 144 S.W.3d 618, 620 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Moreover, on September 18, 2019, the Court issued its opi nion and order denying relief on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Relator’s motions are DENIED

.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

1 Relator has also filed an objection to a State’s response that applies only to his mandamus action pending in cau se no. 05

- 19

- 00708

- C V

.
Burl Anderson HOWELL, petitioner, v. Robert B. YOUNG, Judge, Superior Court of Delaware, Kent County, et al.

No. 12-9761.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHIE KITTLES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2024-0886

[July 25, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael I. Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 17-

014780CF10A; 17-000467CF10A.

Richie Kittles, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Kelvon GRIMMAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1632

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY 

(MUTUAL),

Plaintiff,

v.

D&S PAINTING, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00610-NC 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendants in this case having failed to appear at the case management conference on May 

10, 2017, and having failed to respond to numerous summons notices, Dkt. Nos. 10-14, and 

plaintiff having failed to file for default,

THE COURT hereby issues an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why plaintiff’s claims should 

not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure.

The deadline for plaintiff to move for default is May 24, 2017. If plaintiff fails to move by 

that deadline, the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No default need be filed if 

defendants have appeared by May 24, 2017. 

A further case management conference is scheduled for June 14, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in 

Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, U.S. District Court, 280 S. First Street, San Jose, California. An updated 

cases management statement is due June 7, 2017. If defendants appear, they also must consent or 

decline the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2017

______________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LUCIANO DEL LUPO and MARIE LUISA DEL LUPO,

Appellants,

v.

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

THE MEADOWS MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION, INC., 

THE TOWN FOUNDATION, INC. and 

SUNTRUST BANK, 

Appellees.

No. 4D17-3634

[February 7, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 

062009CA064971AXXXCE.

Jonathan Kline of Jonathan Kline, P.A., Weston, for appellants.

Jacqueline J. Brown and Sean P. Belmudez of McCabe, Weisberg & 

Conway, LLC, Tampa, for appellee Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERESA HILL,

Plaintiff,

v.

T.J. MAXX OF CA, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00847-MEJ 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On April 13, 2017, Defendant T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC filed a Motion to Compel 

Arbitration, with a noticed hearing date of May 25, 2017. Dkt. No. 13. Responses were due April 

27, 2017; however, Plaintiff Teresa Hill failed to file an opposition pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the motion hearing and ORDERS Plaintiff to show 

cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with 

court deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a declaration by May 9, 2017. If a responsive declaration is 

filed, the Court shall either issue an order based on the declaration or conduct a hearing on May 

25, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 

California. Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be deemed an 

admission that Plaintiff does not intend to prosecute, and the case will be dismissed without 

prejudice. Thus, it is imperative that the Court receive a written response by the deadline above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2017

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge
Derris HURTH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10271.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL CREDIT SERVICE -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 6th Floor

San Jose, CA 95110

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TANESHA COLLAZO, 

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

Case No.: 4:17-cv-00416-YGR

 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH 

DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL CREDIT 

SERVICE

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT plaintiff Tanesha Collazo and defendant

Professional Credit Service of the above captioned case and are in the process of documenting 

said settlement. The parties believe the settlement will be finalized within 30 days and will 

request dismissal of this action. 

Sagaria Law, P.C.

Dated: April 19, 2017 By: /s/ Elliot Gale 

Elliot Gale

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 36 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL CREDIT SERVICE -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Professional Credit Service

Dated: April 19, 2017 By: /s/ Hannah Rachel Horsfall

Hannah Rachel Horsfall

 Attorneys for Defendant

Professional Credit Service

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file 

this Notice. I hereby attest that Hannah Rachel Horsfall has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 36 Filed 04/19/17 Page 2 of 2
1

Case No. 17-CV-00373-LHK 

ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE YAHOO! INC. SECURITIES 

LITIGATION

Case No. 17-CV-00373-LHK 

ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE

Re: Dkt. No. 68

The parties have been requesting postponement of the case schedule since October 13, 

2017 because of possible settlement. On January 23, 2018, the parties filed a joint settlement 

status update representing that most of the parties have reached a settlement agreement, but that 

Plaintiff Ben Maher has not agreed to the settlement at this time. ECF No. 68 at 2. The parties 

request that the Court vacate the deadlines set in the Court’s November 22, 2017 Order Denying 

Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Joinder as Moot, ECF No. 65. The parties’ request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 5:17-cv-00373-LHK Document 69 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00373-LHK 

ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Dated: January 24, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00373-LHK Document 69 Filed 01/24/18 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         339,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               420,345
<PP&E>                                       8,737,033
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,741,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,416,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,918
<BONDS>                                      6,370,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,123,117)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,416,122
<SALES>                                        657,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               662,410
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             229,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (182,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (182,021)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (182,021)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (16.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (16.26)


</TABLE>
EX PARTE Buford LESTER

CR-17-0370

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Baldwin Cir. Ct.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES CUNHA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHICO PRODUCE, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00597-JST 

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO 

FILE SUR-REPLY

Re: ECF No. 131

In his evidentiary objections to Defendant’s reply, Plaintiff asks the Court to disregard 

portions of Defendant’s reply brief or, alternatively, for leave to file a sur-reply. ECF No. 131 at 

2-3. Plaintiff’s alternative request is granted. Plaintiff may file a sur-reply of no more than five 

pages by April 30, 2018, at 5:00 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 26, 2018 

______________________________________ 

JON S. TIGAR 

United States District Judge
David R. BROWN, petitioner, v. James HEIMGARTNER, Warden, et al.

No. 12-9858.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 128-129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32269]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Citizens Independent Bancorp, Inc., et al.; Formations of; 
Acquisitions by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec. 225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing. [[Page 129]] 
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than January 27, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (John J. Wixted, Jr., Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101:
    1. Citizens Independent Bancorp, Inc., Logan, Ohio; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
The Citizens Bank of Logan, Logan, Ohio.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Riverside Bancshares Inc., Logansport, Louisiana; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 89.46 percent of the voting shares of 
The Bank of Logansport, Logansport, Louisiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 27, 
1994.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 94-32269 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, who is
carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield
Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services
Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc.,
the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure
Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield Asset Management Barbados Inc. and others,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge on the date hereof, (i) the
annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the
information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.   Dated: May 26, 2010/s/ John StinebaughJohn StinebaughCFO, Brookfield
  Infrastructure Corporation  1
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

        Color Additives in Specific Products

In Drugs Home
          For Industry
          Color Additives
          Color Additives in Specific Products
          In DrugsColor Additives in Specific Products In Drugs
  	
        Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintThe documents listed below provide information on using color additives in drugs, in compliance with regulatory requirements.

Resources

Color Additives Listed for Use in Drugs
	Declaration of presence of FD&C Yellow No. 5 and/or FD&C Yellow No. 6 in certain drugs for human use (21 CFR 201.20)

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      11/15/2017
                  
                   
Regulated Product(s)
		 Drugs
			  			     			  			     Food & Beverages
			     			  						              
			
			
			
			
			
						  Food & Color AdditivesIn Drugs
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
# Official Journal C 380/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 380 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6122 October 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 380

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6122 October 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 380/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9104 — Bain Capital Private Equity/Esure Group) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 380/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9096 — Vallourec Tubes/Bpifrance Group/Vallourec Umbilicals) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 380/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9104 — Bain Capital Private Equity/Esure Group) (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 380/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9096 — Vallourec Tubes/Bpifrance Group/Vallourec Umbilicals) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 380/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 380/03

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN