Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Notices 26425

mandated by Commisison regulations,

and has applied the resulting percentage

figures to the retained gas volumes for

each customer, thereby paying the

interesting as volumes.

All parties that have already filed

comments or protests regarding the

subject corrected refund report need not

file in response to this notice.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, N.E.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with 385.211 of the Commission’s Rules

and Regulations. All such protests

should be filed on or before May 18,

1995. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12056 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. GT95–34–000]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Refund Report

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on April 26, 1995,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia) tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission) a Capacity Access

Program Refund Report. The report

indicates that Columbia flowed through

to customers that had utilized

Columbia’s Firm Transportation

Capacity on Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation (Docket Nos. RP90–119 and

RP88–67) and Texas Gas Transmission

Corporation (Docket No. RP90–104) via

Columbia’s Capacity Access Program,

the portion of Texas Eastern and Texas

Gas’s refund, which was applicable to

the quantities transported on Texas Gas

and Texas Eastern by each customer

under Columbia’s Capacity Access

Program.

Columbia states that it flowed through

these refunds in the form of credits to

invoices issued on or around April 10,

1995, which were payable to Columbia

on or before April 20, 1995. Interest was

included in the amount refunded to

each customer, calculated through April

19, 1995, in accordance with Section

154.67(c)(2) of the Commission’s

Regulations. The total amount credited

was $160,179.26.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

825 North Capitol Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426, in accordance

with Rules 211 and 214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.

All such motions or protests should be

filed on or before May 18, 1995. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–12059 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. TM95–5–34–001]

Florida Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on May 10, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT) tendered for filing to become part

of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revision

Volume No. 1, the following tariff

sheets:

Substitute 4th Revised Eighth Revised Sheet

No. 8A

Substitute 3rd Revised Original Sheet No.

8A.02

On May 1, 1995, FGT filed tariff

sheets in Docket No. TM95–5–34–000 to

make out-of-cycle adjustments to both

the Current Fuel Reimbursement Charge

and the Annual Fuel Surcharge (Fuel

Filing) proposed to become effective

June 1, 1995. Contained in this filing

were tariff sheets including 4th Revised

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A and 3rd

Revised Original Sheet No. 8A.02. The

revisions to these tariff sheets were

redlined from 3rd Revised Eighth

Revised Sheet No. 8A and 2nd Revised

Original Sheet No. 8A.02, which were

also filed on May 1, 1995 in Docket Nos.

TM94–4–34–006 and RP95–259–000

and also proposed to become effective

on June 1, 1995. Subsequently, FGT has

become aware that it inadvertently

failed to revise 3rd Revised Eighth

Revised Sheet No. 8A and 2nd Revised

Original Sheet No. 8A.02 to reflect the

elimination of the Annual Unit Take-OrPay Surcharge from the maximum usage

charges and associated footnotes.

Therefore, concurrent with the instant

filing, FGT is filing Substitute 3rd

Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8A

and Substitute 2nd Revised Original

Sheet No. 8A.02 in Docket Nos. TM94–

4–34–007 and RP95–259–001 to correct

this oversight. In the instant filing, FGT

is making conforming changes to the

referenced tariff sheets filed herewith.

Any person desiring to protest said

filing should file a motion protest with

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,

N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 in

accordance with § 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such protests should be filed on or

before May 18, 1995. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 94–12051 Filed 5–16–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket Nos. TM94–4–34–007 and RP95–

259–001]

Florida Gas Transmission Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

May 11, 1995.

Take notice that on May 10, 1995,

Florida Gas Transmission Company

(FGT) tendered for filing to become part

of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revision

Volume No. 1, the following tariff

sheets:

Substitute 3rd Revised Eighth Revised Sheet

No. 8A

Substitute 2nd Revised Original Sheet No.

8A.02

On May 1, 1995, FGT filed in Docket

Nos. TM94–4–34–006 and RP95–259–

000 to replace the Annual Unit Take-OrPay Surcharge (TOP Surcharge)

mechanism by modifying Section 25 of

the General Terms and Conditions of

FGT’s Tariff to reflect that recovery of

remaining Southern Fixed Charge

balances will be pursuant to

arrangements which have been mutually

agreed to between FGT and the

customers with remaining balances. In

the May 1 filing, FGT inadvertently

failed to reduce the maximum usage

charges to reflect the elimination of the

volumetric TOP Surcharge.

FGT states that in the instant filing,

FGT is correcting this oversight by