alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT CARL GORSKI,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF MARIN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00322-JSC 

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff Robert Carl Gorski, representing himself, brought this civil action against 

Defendants the County of Marin, San Rafael Police Department, and Linda Aroyan. The Court 

granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and reviewed his complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915. (Dkt. No. 13.) On 1915 review, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for 

failure to state a claim because Plaintiff had not specified a legal basis for his claims. Plaintiff was 

granted leave to amend his complaint and instructed to do so by April 7, 2017. On that date, 

Plaintiff filed a motion to continue seeking a six month extension of time to file his amended 

complaint so that he could obtain additional documents supporting his claims and retain an 

attorney. (Dkt. No. 14.) The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion in part giving him until May 30, 

2017 to file his amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 15.) Plaintiff was also referred to the Legal Help 

Center for free legal advice regarding his claims and warned that failure to file his amended 

complaint by May 30 would result in the dismissal of his complaint for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiff failed to file his amended complaint by this date and has not otherwise 

communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

The Clerk shall close the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2017

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paul W. Mobley, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noble Roman's,
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (that registrant's forth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  November 12, 2004                             /s/  Paul W. Mobley
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Paul W. Mobley
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Just i ces

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

s0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

138558

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138558 COA: 288352 Oakland CC: 95-138051-FC DWAYNE G. BARTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 4, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
*fiW$AJ, TV- 1WI A

Lopez, S-Ule. <J*( ( (2*03 El Qbbk fZLj. gdtyibortf,7yc ~7&5Y2- V/^A V,S.-TVIA/^ 

## filefOts-Htdfda/tfic«-hcrrt treojtrJmy m<A -hkJ Wnf iff fp°*J Ctrpus, pursuit U A^^ M7. RECEIVEDIN 

## J* ,5 ^ MU O^ersUU^ Afei; COURTOPCR.M.NALAPPEALS U APR 062015 jLL(Zoy?>

—rb ' AteiA'costa.Cleirk

lloT:

### ShiTOS A*/" <JY\M<L ft hire Counsel of- my CsktfOslrJCj. 

## Q7^/2.0^3 -A tVr//^ ujjft^'f^refunds



## my ujri^ o4 (kUts Girpos ((<+/7-6^3-A)* 0*> //-'/^H^ 

# h my uOrif ^/V/Z^-m) , X helrt^-fbis {faiMJT filed wU4 btlti^e. -Jhe armpU-k pulu^ -fiwA*



## fa U)U ^ ikt y«mcb>-A*J*) me^r«*Jam cm



# fa p&rScmh*) /{*7 4TM. P/«s* M>-f?'oz ^ h*U* aJ*+ adJzJ AAJy grand* A*V J*e. Jo -/^e /Mcorrect fiff^f (pfoa^sj, SI uvdzr <ft»lc such "Sts -hi*J e° p<ec-^



## Pag* Zof<f

## f\}lHt**K} fjffAcri^L dtor-lofApp*«-k CUrlL, OaJ fejt> /B;-2J>/S- faunM* Pvs/rtrif tfoJfe- ITUf^ /W ^« 

# ^aA ,w **'<"** ^u/ a%u'' 3e^ ^kerS/ 2,-iso fabu pr,*., s-k- iw>, H*«s{TM,~r>° "77"^ A....A-



# * ^ v *-^ "^7 ^ „ r^,<W h*raPy *f *&*<**•< J «•**< *" ^


# Shyr*s*»ty ^Q M^ fAi. 6lLDe*~ ^ me k rccA',uc Ukilf asJs A* &? £*»+^

Paae 3 ^ *f

### j2eSAec*f"£/ SobtocHed.



### S%£ *4

# [J(j$lA)d£M ped*s*h(*\ &y 5&»»W2. 3- ,Anik(mu <f/^y, tfts^ fanypns**faj



# AJ Ctrrt-4- h H-e W erf *r *<*'<

-e<su

# JcJ <m^Y-ik*. ^V<_/*^qf.!A) tdcOleqc
- PASSPORT Thursday, March 26, 2015, 10:27:18 AM CSINIB02/CINIB02 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 1EQC/CV00007 IN-FORMA-PAUPERIS DATA TDCJ#: 01928601 SID#: 08724706 LOCATION: LOPEZ NAME: NASH,ANTHONY GLENN BEGINNING PREVIOUS TDCJ NUMBERS:0.00 TOT HOLD AMT: 180.00 6MTH AVG BAL: BALANCE TOTAL 39 99 25

HOLD AMOUNT JUSTICE

PERIOD: INDIGENT 08/01/14 03/26/15 10:27:07 DTE: 01/06/15

CURRENT BAL: 6MTH DEP: MONTH HIGHEST 01/15 .204 12/14 105 11/14 44 PROCESS DATE 0.00 3MTH TOT 36.30 6MTH AVG "DEP: DEP: TOTAL 80 30 DEPOSITS 100.00 0.00 0.00 ' 00 00

STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF H\

_ ON THIS THE"14_~DAY OF \kcAX-. Zjn COMPLETE,AND UNALTERED COPY MADE BY ME OF INFORMATION CONTAINED COMPUTER DATABASE REGARDING THE OFFENDER'S ACCOUNT. NP> SIG: PF1-HELP PF3-END ENTER NEXT TDCJ NUMBER: ' OR SID NUMBER DEPOSITS MONTH HIGHEST BA 0.00 10/14 44 25 0.00 09/14 195 12 0.00 08/14 195 12 HOLD DESCRIPTION

Notary withoutBond I CERTIFY THAT THIS

LUPE GONZALEZ Notary Public, State ofTexas

MyCommission Expires

AUGUST03,2015

• m % DOCUMENT IS A TRUE, IN THE
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. (“the
Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric H.
Brunngraber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Eric H. BrunngraberEric
      H. BrunngraberPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)November
      4, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass Information Systems,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
方便食品存放7天以上可能导致顾客食物

中毒!

随时随地保障人们的饮食安全。

供应或丢弃,7天的冷冻方便食品!

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection

在41°F(5°C)下保存数天
Keeping prepared foods longer than

7 days can make your customers sick!

Protect People Everywhere.

Serve or discard refrigerated,

prepared food within 7 days!

Copyright © International Association for Food Protection

Days at 41oF (5oC)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Pond Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen F. Wiggins, as Chairman of the Board and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen F. Wiggins             
|Stephen F. Wiggins                 
|Chairman of the Board and President

Date: July 20, 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RYAN HOULGATE,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. EMPLOYEE 

BENEFIT PLAN,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00906-JSC 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 22

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; 

provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with 

proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said 

settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall 

forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 18, 2017

______________________________________

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 20778-20779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10400]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Advisory Committee for Geosciences; Notice of Meeting, Committee 
of Visitors

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Geosciences (Committee of Visitors) 
#1755.
    Date and Time: May 17, 18 and 19, 1995; 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Conference Room #770, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Jarvis L. Moyers, Section Head, Lower 
Atmospheric Research Section, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Room 
775, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 
22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1523.
    Purpose of Meeting: To evaluate the administration of the 
research grants programs in the Lower Atmospheric Research Section 
of the Division of Atmospheric Sciences.
    Agenda: Review and evaluate the decisions and actions of the 
Lower Atmospheric Research Section.
    Reason for Closing: The materials being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals 
[[Page 20779]] handled by the NSF programs and proposal reviewers. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-10400 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11059]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Concession Contract Negotiations for Continued Operation of Air 
Transportation Services; Isle Royale National Park, MI

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a concession permit authorizing continued operation 
of air transportation services to and from Isle Royale National Park 
for the public at Isle Royale National Park, Michigan, for a period of 
approximately five (5) years from date of execution through December 
31, 2000.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties should contact the Superintendent, Isle 
Royale National Park, 800 East Lakeshore Drive, Houghton, Michigan 
49931 to obtain a copy of the prospectus describing the requirements of 
the proposed permit.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This permit renewal has been determined to 
be categorically excluded from the procedural provisions of the 
National Environmental Policy Act and no environmental document will be 
prepared. The existing concessioner has performed its obligations to 
the satisfaction of the Secretary under an existing permit which 
expired by limitation of time on December 31, 1994, and therefore 
pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Act of October 9, 1965 
(79 Stat. 969; 16 U.S.C. 20), is entitled to be given preference in the 
negotiation of a new proposed permit providing that the existing 
concessioner submits a responsive offer (a timely offer which meets the 
terms and conditions of the Prospectus). This means that the permit 
will be awarded to the party submitting the best offer, provided that 
if the best offer was not submitted by the existing concessioner, then 
the existing concessioner will be afforded the opportunity to match the 
best offer. If the existing concessioner agrees to match the best 
offer, then the permit will be awarded to the existing concessioner.

    If the existing concessioner does not submit a responsive offer, 
the right of preference in renewal shall be considered to have been 
waived, and the permit will then be awarded to the party that has 
submitted the best responsive offer.
    The Secretary will consider and evaluate all proposals received as 
a result of this notice. Any proposal, including that of the existing 
concessioner, must be received by the Superintendent not later than the 
sixtieth (60th) day following publication of this notice to be 
considered and evaluated.

    Dated: April 4, 1995.
William W. Schenk,
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 95-11059 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BAMIDELE HAMBOLU, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WASSERMAN-STERN ATTORNEYS, et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-mc-80018-PJH 

DETERMINATION REGARDING 

WHETHER COMPLAINT SHOULD BE 

ACCEPTED FOR FILING

Re: Dkt. No. 1, 12

Plaintiff Lynn Gavin is subject to a pre-filing order dated January 12, 2016 in Case 

No. 15-cv-05202-EMC, which declared her to be a vexatious litigant. Pursuant to this 

order, Gavin “must obtain leave of court before filing any further suits based on her 

allegations that she was wrongfully evicted from the Parkmerced apartments in 2012.” 

No. 15-cv-05202-EMC Dkt. 9 at 7. “The Clerk of this Court may not file or accept any 

further complaints filed by or on behalf of Plaintiff alleging any claims of wrongful eviction 

from the Parkmerced apartment in 2012. If Plaintiff wishes to file a complaint alleging 

any such claims, she shall provide a copy of any such complaint, a letter requesting that 

the complaint be filed, and a copy of this Order to the Clerk of this Court. The Clerk shall 

then forward the complaint, letter, and copy of this Order to the Duty Judge for a 

determination whether the complaint should be accepted for filing.” Id.

This matter was referred to the undersigned for a determination of whether the 

complaint should be accepted for filing. Good cause appearing, the court orders that the 

Clerk shall decline to accept the complaint for filing, because Lynn Gavin is named as a 

plaintiff and the action arises out of her 2012 eviction from the Parkmerced apartment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2017

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:17-mc-80018-PJH Document 13 Filed 02/16/17 Page 1 of 1
Antari Kashaun JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1391

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 12, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Carl Ritter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | /s/
      Carl Ritter         | 
| | ----------------------------- | 
| | Carl Ritter                   | 
| | Chief Executive Officer       | 
| | (principal executive officer) | 
| | December 17, 2007             | 

---
Sylvester JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3562

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHRISTINA GRACE and KEN POTTER, )

Individually and on Behalf of All Others, )

Similarly Situated, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 5:17-cv-00551-LHK

)

APPLE, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

Expert Report of Professor Justine S. Hastings, Ph.D.

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-77 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 3
3

FaceTime on their device; (2) migrate to iOS 7, but suffer the lost functionality that iOS 7 caused 

to iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S devices; or (3) purchase a new iPhone device that possessed the 

processing capability necessary to operate iOS 7 without decreasing functionality, and thus regain 

the ability to use FaceTime on iOS 7. I will refer to the April 16, 2014 expiration of the certificate 

that allowed the FaceTime feature to work as “the Break” hereafter.

7. Plaintiffs’ counsel asked me to assess whether there is common impact from the 

Break and to calculate aggregate class-wide damages measured by the diminution in value of 

Proposed Class Members’ iPhone 4 and 4S devices caused by the Break. I use an econometric 

model which yields reliable estimates of aggregate damages and restitution measured by 

diminution in value of the Proposed Class Member’s iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S devices caused by 

the Break, incorporating facts, evidence, and methodologies which are common to the class and 

of the type well-relied on by economist when estimating damages.

I.C. Summary and Conclusions 

8. As a damages expert, my task is to “proceed on the hypothesis that the defendant 

committed the harmful act and that the act was unlawful.” 1 I then ask and answer how an 

economist can use well-relied on methodologies to assess common impact and measure damages 

caused by the Break using evidence and methodologies common to the Class. The harmful act in 

this case, “the Break,” is the April 16, 2014 expiration of a digital certificate that allowed the 

FaceTime feature to work on Proposed Class Members’ iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S phones.2

9. My primary conclusions are:

 1 Allen, M., Hall, R., and Lazear, V. (2011), “Reference Guide on Estimation of Economic Damages,” in Reference 

Manual on Scientific Evidence, Federal Judicial Center, National Research Council of the National Academies, pp. 

425-502, at 432.

2 See Exhibit A (Expert Report of Justine S. Hastings, Ph.D. (May 4, 2018) (hereinafter, “Hastings Expert Report”) 

(ECF 174-85)), ¶ 6.

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-77 Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 3
30 

I declare that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed on this 28th

day of August. 

________________________ 

Justine S. Hastings 

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-77 Filed 10/18/18 Page 3 of 3
Calvin BRUCE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-10016.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.