alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 244 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 244

Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2021

   Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Blunt) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for members on the part of the Senate of the Joint Committee 
    on Printing and the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected members of the following joint committees of Congress:
    Joint Committee on Printing: Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. King, Mr. Padilla, 
Mr. Blunt, and Mr. Wicker.
    Joint Committee of Congress on the Library: Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
Leahy, Mr. Warner, Mr. Blunt, and Mr. Shelby.
                                 <all>
```
#### Antonio TORRES-PIEDRA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-60263.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 11, 2004.

Daniel M. Kowalski, Austin, TX, for Petitioner.

Kenneth L. Pasquarell, Acting District Director, US Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, San Antonio, TX, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Mark C. Walters, Leslie Cayer Ohta, US Department of Justice, Civil Division, John Ashcroft, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Caryl G. Thompson, US Immigration & Naturalization Service, Attn. Joe A. Aguilar, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Petitioner Antonio Torres-Piedra (“Torres”) petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirming the order of the Immigration Judge (IJ) that denied Torres’s application for cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). Torres contests the merits of the IJ’s determination that he was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal on the ground of continuous presence and because he faded to demonstrate the requisite hardship. The Respondent has filed a motion requesting that we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction because the IJ’s determination on hardship is a discretionary one that is immune from judicial review. We agree.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that Torres’s children would not suffer an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” if Torres were deported to Mexico. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D); 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Bravo v. Ashcroft,*341 F.3d 590, 592 (5th Cir.2003). As the IJ’s determination on hardship is fatal to Torres’s application, and that determination is not subject to judicial review, it would be a hollow act for us to consider the IJ’s finding on continuous presence, much less rule on it. The Respondent’s motion is therefore GRANTED and Torres’s petition DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

22095

Vol. 60, No. 86

Thursday, May 4, 1995

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP93-49-000]

Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of

Settlement Conference

Correction

In notice document 95–10561

appearing on page 21187 in the issue of

Monday, May 1, 1995, in the first

column, the document should be

removed because it is a duplicate of FR

Doc. 95-10563.

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 1852

Indemnification Under Public Law 85-

804

Correction

In rule document 95–8511 beginning

on page 18032 in the issue of Monday,

April 10, 1995, make the following

correction:

On page 18034, in the third column,

the first bold line after amendatory

instruction 8 should read as set forth

below.

1852.250-70— [Removed]

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
EXHIBIT 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-157817) and the related prospectus of Fly Leasing Limited (the Company),
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-163036) and the related prospectus of the Company, and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-166667), pertaining to the Companys 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 11, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of the Company included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco,
California

December 22, 2011
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Lukas Braunschweiler, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Dionex Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, andto which this Certification is attached (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     By: /s/ Lukas Braunschweiler  Name:  Lukas Braunschweiler  Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  Date: November 9, 2006
Christopher Randall COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1689

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Carrie McMullen, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant's convictions and sentences for both possessing methamphetamine, and possessing the same meth with intent to sell it, within a thousand feet of a single proscribed location, do not violate double jeopardy. *Thomas v. State* , 61 So. 3d 1157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) ; *see also**Johnson v. State* , 150 So. 3d 214, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (collecting cases).

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Rowe, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
David S. HASTINGS, DOC #Y55957, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2391

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-01950-MHP Document 24 Filed 09/01/05 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:05-cv-01950-MHP Document 24 Filed 09/01/05 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:05-cv-01950-MHP Document 24 Filed 09/01/05 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF TITANIUM ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP.
 Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or
    
    Name Under Which theName
    
    Organization
    
    Subsidiary does BusinessWood Asset Management, Inc.
    
    Florida
    
    Wood Asset Management, Inc.Sovereign Holdings, LLC
    
    North Carolina
    
    Sovereign AdvisorsNational Investment Services, Inc.
    
    Wisconsin
    
    National Investment Services, Inc.Boyd Watterson Asset Management, LLC
    
    Ohio
    
    Boyd Watterson Asset Management, LLCTitanium Incentive Plan, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Titanium Incentive Plan, LLC
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ANNETTE PETERS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PFIZER INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-01196-TEH 

REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF 

DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled case is hereby REFERRED 

to the Honorable Edward M. Chen for consideration of whether the case is related to 

Little v. Pfizer Inc., Case No. 14-cv-01177-EMC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 03/14/17 ______________________________________ 

THELTON E. HENDERSON 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:14-cv-01177-EMC Document 126 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 1
Patrick A. MISSUD, petitioner, v. D.R. HORTON, INC., et al.

No. 12-9412.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until June 18, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683

MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

332 North Second Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone (408) 298-2000

Facsimile (408) 298-6046

Email: service@mission.legal

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Francisca Moralez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCA MORALEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DARAKAR, INC.; VALERO 1800 W 10TH

STREET, ANTIOCH, CA;

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 4:17-cv-00648-KAW

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

ENTIRE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Kandis Westmore
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Francisca Moralez and 

Defendants, Darakar, Inc., and Valero 1800 W 10th Street, Antioch, CA, the parties to this 

action, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned 

action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees 

and costs.

Dated: August 13, 2018 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C.

 /s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Francisca Moralez

Dated: August 13, 2018 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES

 /s/ Cris C. Vaughan

Cris C. Vaughan

Attorneys for Defendants,

Darakar, Inc., and Valero 1800 W 10th Street,

Antioch, CA

ATTESTATION

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s) 

whose electronic signature is attributed above.

 /s/ Tanya E. Moore

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

Francisca Moralez
Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement




 

 
  

 EXHIBIT 10.47 
 Freescale Confidential Information 
 Amendment to Employment Agreement 
  
  
  
                      (“Executive”) and Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. (“Company”) agree to
the following amendment (“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) previously executed between Company and Executive: 
 In consideration for Executive’s continued employment, and to contribute to the economic viability of the company in difficult economic times, Executive consents to a reduction of Executive’s current base
salary by                     . Executive understands that this salary reduction will be effective immediately, and will continue until
December 31, 2009, unless Freescale, in its sole discretion, decides to restore Executive’s current base salary prior to that date. Executive acknowledges the adequacy of the consideration for this amendment. 
 Executive understands that Freescale does not intend this temporary pay reduction to impact the level of any benefits that are calculated using Executive’s base
salary. Unless prohibited by law or contract, benefits such as life insurance, disability pay and severance pay, as applicable, will be calculated using Executive’s current base salary and not the base salary after this temporary pay reduction.

 Executive agrees not to seek future payment from Freescale of the difference between Executive’s current base salary and the amount Executive is paid
during this temporary salary reduction. Executive further agrees not to use this temporary salary reduction as a basis for claiming constructive discharge, violation of Freescale policy, a right to severance pay or breach of Executive’s
Agreement. Specifically, but without limitation, Executive agrees that this temporary salary reduction does not constitute a breach of the Agreement, Good Reason under said Agreement or other agreements or benefit plans, or the basis for a claim of
severance or other benefits or other payments under the Agreement or any other agreement with Freescale. 
  


			
	Initial         	 	1










 

 
  

 Executive represents that the decision to agree to this Amendment and this temporary salary reduction is completely
voluntary, and that Executive has not been coerced or pressured in any way to agree to this Amendment. 
  

									
		 		 	Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
			
	  
	 		 	  

	Signature	 		 	Signature
			
	  
	 		 	  

	Name	 		 	Name
			
	  
	 		 	  

	Title	 		 	Title
			
	  
	 		 	  

	Date Signed	 		 	Date Signed

  


			
	Initial         	 	2
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1033]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 94-143]


Television Table of Allotments: Albion, NE

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the Notice of Proposed 
Rule Making in MM Docket No. 94-143, a summary of which was published 
on January 3, 1995 (60 FR 91). The Notice is corrected to specify 
reference coordinates for the proposed Channel 24 allotment at Albion, 
Nebraska, as 41-55-58 and 98-17-23, and a plus offset for the Channel 
24 allotment.

DATES: Comments must be field by Feb. 13, 1995, and reply comments by 
Feb. 28, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Federal Communications Commission, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau (202) 634-6530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Need for Correction

    As published, the Notice of Proposed Rule Making contained an error 
with respect to the reference coordinates and channel offset for the 
proposed allotment of Channel 24 to Albion, Nebraska.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on January 3, 1995, of the Summary of 
the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in MM Docket 94-143, which was the 
subject of FR Doc. 94-32275, is corrected as follows:
    On page 91, in the first and second columns, all references to 
``Channel 24'' are corrected to read ``Channel 24+.''
    On page 91, in the second column, the references coordinates for 
Channel 24+ at Albion, Nebraska, are corrected to read ``41-55-58 and 
98-17-23.''

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 95-1033 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132249 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132249 

 COA: 271611 

Antrim CC: 05-003913-FH 

GREGORY JOSEPH HOFFMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 
| The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of BEC Funding II, LLC, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   (i)                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | the enclosed Quarterly Report of BEC Funding II, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  |
|   (ii)                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of BEC Funding II, LLC.

  |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |

 
|                                                  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: November 4, 2005      |   | By:   | /s/ THOMAS J. MAY       |
|                                                  |   |   | Thomas J. May |
|                                                  |   |   | Chairman, President and |
|                                                  |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10229]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Republic Security Financial Corporation; Formation of, 
Acquisition by, or Merger of Bank Holding Companies

    The company listed in this notice has applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    The application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that application or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Any comment on an application that 
requests a hearing must include a statement of why a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute and summarizing 
the evidence that would be presented at a hearing.
    Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
May 19, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Republic Security Financial Corporation, West Palm Beach, 
Florida; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Republic Security Bank, West Palm Beach, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 20, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-10229 Filed 4-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2005

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emerging Media Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Iurie
Bordian, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Iurie Bordian
                                           -----------------
                                           Iurie Bordian
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                           Financial Officer



                                           Dated: May 08, 2008