Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices 21009

Bacon and Related Acts’’ are listed by

Volume and State:

VOLUME V

Nebraska

NE950059 (APR.28,1995)

NE950060 (APR.28,1995)

Modification to General Wage

Determination Decisions

The number of decisions listed in the

Government Printing Office document

entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations

Issued Under the Davis-Bacon and

Related Acts’’ being modified are listed

by Volume and State. Dates of

publication in the Federal Register are

in parentheses following the decisions

being modified.

VOLUME I

Massachusetts

MA950001 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950002 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950003 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950009 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950017 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950019 (FEB.10,1995)

New York

NY950077 (FEB.17,1995)

Rhode Island

RI950001 (FEB.10,1995)

RI950002 (FEB.10,1995)

RI950003 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME II

Delaware

DE950001 (FEB.10,1995)

DE950002 (FEB.10,1995)

DE950005 (FEB.10,1995)

DE950009 (FEB.10,1995)

Pennsylvania

PA950010 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME III

Georgia

GA950040 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME IV

Michigan

MI950001 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950002 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950003 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950004 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950005 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950007 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950012 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950017 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME V

Iowa

IA950005 (FEB.10,1995)

Kansas

KS950006 (FEB.10,1995)

KS950008 (FEB.10,1995)

KS950012 (FEB.10,1995)

Missouri

MO950003 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950005 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950007 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950010 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950014 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950016 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950020 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950046 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950053 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950056 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950059 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950063 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950064 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950066 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950068 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950069 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950070 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950074 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950075 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950076 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950077 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950078 (FEB.10,1995)

Nebraska

NE950001 (FEB.10,1995)

NE950002 (FEB.10,1995)

NE950007 (FEB.10,1995)

Oklahoma

OK950013 (FEB.10,1995)

OK950018 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME VI

None

General Wage Determination

Publication

General wage determinations issued

under the Davis-Bacon and Related

Acts, including those noted above, may

be found in the Government Printing

Office (GPO) document entitled

‘‘General Wage Determinations Issued

Under the Davis-Bacon and Related

Acts’’. This publication is available at

each of the 50 Regional Government

Depository Libraries and many of the

1,400 Government Depository Libraries

across the country.

The general wage determinations

issued under the Davis-Bacon and

related Acts are available electronically

by subscription to the FedWorld

Bulletin Board System of the National

Technical Information Service (NTIS) of

the U.S. Department of Commerce at

(703) 487–4630.

Hard-copy subscriptions may be

purchased from: Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Printing

Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, (202)

512–1800.

When ordering hard-copy

subscription(s), be sure to specify the

State(s) of interest, since subscriptions

may be ordered for any or all of the six

separate volumes, arranged by State.

Subscriptions include an annual edition

(issued in January or February) which

includes all current general wage

determinations for the States covered by

each volume. Throughout the remainder

of the year, regular weekly updates will

be distributed to subscribers.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of

April 1995.

Alan L. Moss,

Director, Division of Wage Determinations.

[FR Doc. 95–10353 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–29–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50–254 and 50–265]

Commonwealth Edison Co.; Notice of

Consideration of Issuance of

Amendments to Facility Operating

Licenses, Proposed No Significant

Hazards Consideration Determination,

and Opportunity for a Hearing

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (the Commission) is

considering issuance of amendments to

Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–29

and DPR–30 issued to Commonwealth

Edison Company (ComEd, the licensee)

for operation of the Quad Cities Nuclear

Power Station, Units 1 and 2, located in

Rock Island County, Illinois.

The proposed amendments would

change the Technical Specifications by:

(1) Revising the low pressure value at

which the High Pressure Coolant

Injection (HPCI) and Reactor Core

Isolation Cooling (RCIC) systems can be

tested to 150 psig, and (2) to test these

systems against a system head

corresponding to reactor vessel pressure

when steam is supplied to the turbines

at 920 psig to 1005 psig for high

pressure testing and 150 psig to 325 psig

for low pressure testing.

Before issuance of the proposed

license amendments, the Commission

will have made findings required by the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended

(the Act) and the Commission’s

regulations.

The Commission has made a

proposed determination that the

amendment request involves no

significant hazards consideration. Under

the Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR

50.92, this means that operation of the

facility in accordance with the proposed

amendments would not (1) involve a

significant increase in the probability or

consequences of an accident previously

evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of

a new or different kind of accident from

any accident previously evaluated; or

(3) involve a significant reduction in a

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its

analysis of the issue of no significant

hazards consideration, which is

presented below:

(1) Involve a significant increase in the

probability or consequences of an accident

previously evaluated because:

The proposed changes revise the testing

requirements for the low pressure HPCI and

RCIC systems, and as such do not affect any

accident precursors or initiators. Therefore,

the proposed changes do not increase the

probability of any previously evaluated

accident.

Similarly, the proposed changes

implement testing requirements which will
21010 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices

reduce unnecessary strain on the HPCI and

RCIC systems during testing, and provide

added assurance that the HPCI and RCIC will

perform their design functions throughout

the entire operating pressure range of the

equipment. Therefore, the proposed changes

enhance the ability of the HPCI and RCIC

systems and equipment to mitigate the

consequences of an accident.

(2) Create the possibility of a new or

different kind of accident from any accident

previously evaluated because:

The proposed changes do not modify the

HPCI or RCIC design or reduce the capability

of the systems to perform their design

function. The proposed changes will

implement testing requirements which will

reduce unnecessary strain on the HPCI and

RCIC systems during testing, and provide

added assurance that the systems are capable

of performing their design functions

throughout the entire operating pressure

range of the equipment. As such, the

proposed changes are more conservative than

the current requirements. Since the design

basis of the HPCI or RCIC system is not

changed, there is no possibility of a new or

different kind of accident from any

previously evaluated.

(3) Involve a significant reduction in the

margin of safety because:

The proposed changes implement testing

requirements which will reduce unnecessary

strain on the HPCI and RCIC systems during

testing, and provide added assurance that the

HPCI and RCIC systems will perform their

design functions throughout the entire

operating pressure range of the equipment.

The proposed changes will not reduce the

availability and capability of the HPCI and

RCIC systems to mitigate the consequences of

an accident. The proposed changes do not

involve a relaxation of the criteria used to

establish safety limits, a relaxation of the

bases for limiting safety settings, or a

relaxation of the bases for limiting conditions

of operation. Therefore the proposed changes

do not impact the margin of safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed the

licensee’s analysis and, based on this

review, it appears that the three

standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are

satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff

proposes to determine that the

amendment request involves no

significant hazards consideration.

The Commission is seeking public

comments on this proposed

determination. Any comments received

within 30 days after the date of

publication of this notice will be

considered in making any final

determination.

Normally, the Commission will not

issue the amendments until the

expiration of the 30-day notice period.

However, should circumstances change

during the notice period such that

failure to act in a timely way would

result, for example, in derating or

shutdown of the facility, the

Commission may issue the license

amendments before the expiration of the

30-day notice period, provided that its

final determination is that the

amendment involves no significant

hazards consideration. The final

determination will consider all public

and State comments received. Should

the Commission take this action, it will

publish in the Federal Register a notice

of issuance and provide for opportunity

for a hearing after issuance. The

Commission expects that the need to

take this action will occur very

infrequently.

Written comments may be submitted

by mail to the Rules Review and

Directives Branch, Division of Freedom

of Information and Publications

Services, Office of Administration, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555, and should cite

the publication date and page number of

this Federal Register notice. Written

comments may also be delivered to

Room 6D22, Two White Flint North,

11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

Maryland, from 7:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.

Federal workdays. Copies of written

comments received may be examined at

the NRC Public Document Room, the

Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW.,

Washington, DC.

The filing of requests for hearing and

petitions for leave to intervene is

discussed below.

By May 30, 1995, the licensee may file

a request for a hearing with respect to

issuance of the amendments to the

subject facility operating license and

any person whose interest may be

affected by this proceeding and who

wishes to participate as a party in the

proceeding must file a written request

for a hearing and a petition for leave to

intervene. Requests for a hearing and a

petition for leave to intervene shall be

filed in accordance with the

Commission’s ‘‘Rules of Practice for

Domestic Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10

CFR part 2. Interested persons should

consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714

which is available at the Commission’s

Public Document Room, the Gelman

Building, 2120 L Street, NW.,

Washington, DC, and at the local public

document room located at the Dixon

Public Library, 221 Hennepin Avenue,

Dixon, Illinois. If a request for a hearing

or petition for leave to intervene is filed

by the above date, the Commission or an

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board,

designated by the Commission or by the

Chairman of the Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the

request and/or petition; and the

Secretary or the designated Atomic

Safety and Licensing Board will issue a

notice of hearing or an appropriate

order.

As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a

petition for leave to intervene shall set

forth with particularity the interest of

the petitioner in the proceeding, and

how that interest may be affected by the

results of the proceeding. The petition

should specifically explain the reasons

why intervention should be permitted

with particular reference to the

following factors: (1) The nature of the

petitioner’s right under the Act to be

made party to the proceeding; (2) the

nature and extent of the petitioner’s

property, financial, or other interest in

the proceeding; and (3) the possible

effect of any order which may be

entered in the proceeding on the

petitioner’s interest. The petition should

also identify the specific aspect(s) of the

subject matter of the proceeding as to

which petitioner wishes to intervene.

Any person who has filed a petition for

leave to intervene or who has been

admitted as a party may amend the

petition without requesting leave of the

Board up to 15 days prior to the first

prehearing conference scheduled in the

proceeding, but such an amended

petition must satisfy the specificity

requirements described above.

Not later than 15 days prior to the first

prehearing conference scheduled in the

proceeding, a petitioner shall file a

supplement to the petition to intervene

which must include a list of the

contentions which are sought to be

litigated in the matter. Each contention

must consist of a specific statement of

the issue of law or fact to be raised or

controverted. In addition, the petitioner

shall provide a brief explanation of the

bases of the contention and a concise

statement of the alleged facts or expert

opinion which support the contention

and on which the petitioner intends to

rely in proving the contention at the

hearing. The petitioner must also

provide references to those specific

sources and documents of which the

petitioner is aware and on which the

petitioner intends to rely to establish

those facts or expert opinion. Petitioner

must provide sufficient information to

show that a genuine dispute exists with

the applicant on a material issue of law

or fact. Contentions shall be limited to

matters within the scope of the

amendments under consideration. The

contention must be one which, if

proven, would entitle the petitioner to

relief. A petitioner who fails to file such

a supplement which satisfies these

requirements with respect to at least one

contention will not be permitted to

participate as a party.

Those permitted to intervene become

parties to the proceeding, subject to any

limitations in the order granting leave to

intervene, and have the opportunity to
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices 21011

participate fully in the conduct of the

hearing, including the opportunity to

present evidence and cross-examine

witnesses.

If a hearing is requested, the

Commission will make a final

determination on the issue of no

significant hazards consideration. The

final determination will serve to decide

when the hearing is held.

If the final determination is that the

amendment request involves no

significant hazards consideration, the

Commission may issue the amendments

and make them immediately effective,

notwithstanding the request for a

hearing. Any hearing held would take

place after issuance of the amendment.

If the final determination is that the

amendment request involves a

significant hazards consideration, any

hearing held would take place before

the issuance of any amendments.

A request for a hearing or a petition

for leave to intervene must be filed with

the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555, Attention:

Docketing and Services Branch, or may

be delivered to the Commission’s Public

Document Room, the Gelman Building,

2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, by

the above date. Where petitions are filed

during the last 10 days of the notice

period, it is requested that the petitioner

promptly so inform the Commission by

a toll-free telephone call to Western

Union at 1–(800) 248–5100 (in Missouri

1–(800) 342–6700). The Western Union

operator should be given Datagram

Identification Number N1023 and the

following message addressed to Mr.

Robert A. Capra: petitioner’s name and

telephone number, date petition was

mailed, plant name, and publication

date and page number of this Federal

Register notice. A copy of the petition

should also be sent to the Office of the

General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington,

DC 20555, and to Michael I. Miller,

Esquire, Sidley and Austin, One First

National Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60603,

attorney for the licensee.

Nontimely filings of petitions for

leave to intervene, amended petitions

supplemental petitions and/or requests

for hearing will not be entertained

absent a determination by the

Commission, the presiding officer or the

presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing

Board that the petition and/or request

should be granted based upon a

balancing of the factors specified in 10

CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)–(v) and 2.714(d).

For further details with respect to this

action, see the application for

amendments dated April 10, 1995,

which is available for public inspection

at the Commission’s Public Document

Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L

Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the

local public document room located at

the Dixon Public Library, 221 Hennepin

Avenue, Dixon, Illinois.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day

of April 1995.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Robert M. Pulsifer,

Project Manager, Project Directorate III–2,

Division of Reactor Projects—III/IV, Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 95–10479 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–M

[Docket Nos. 70–7001; 70–7002]

United States Enrichment Corporation:

Paducah Gaseous Plant; Portsmouth

Gaseous Diffusion Plant; Notice of

Receipt of Application for Certification

for the Gaseous Diffusion Plants and

Notice of Comment Period and Notice

of Public Meetings

I. Receipt of Application and

Availability of Documents

Notice is hereby given that the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC

or the Commission) has received by

letter dated April 18, 1995, an

application from the United States

Enrichment Corporation (USEC) for the

initial certification of the gaseous

diffusion plants (GDPs) located near

Paducah, Kentucky and Piketon, Ohio.

The Energy Policy Act of 1992

established the USEC to operate the

GDPs under lease from the U.S.

Department of Energy and required the

NRC to establish a certification process

and standards for the GDPs to assure

protection of public and workers’ health

and safety and adequate safeguards and

security.

Copies of the application for

certification (except for classified and

proprietary portions withheld in

accordance with 10 CFR 2.790,

‘‘Availability of Public Records’’) are

available for public inspection and

copying at the Commission’s Public

Document Room in the Gelman

Building, 2120 L Street, NW,

Washington, DC 20555 and in the Local

Public Document Rooms established for

these facilities. A copy of the

application for the Paducah plant is

available at the Paducah Public Library,

555 Washington Street, Paducah,

Kentucky 42003. A copy of the

application for the Portsmouth plant is

available at the Portsmouth Public

Library, 1220 Gallia Street, Portsmouth,

Ohio 45662. Copies of related

correspondence and staff evaluations

(except for portions withheld in

accordance with 10 CFR 2.790) will also

be made available at these locations.

II. Notice of Comment Period

Any interested party may submit

written comments on the application for

certification for either the Paducah plant

or the Portsmouth plant for

consideration by the staff. To be certain

of consideration, comments on the

application must be received by June 15,

1995. Comments received after the due

date will be considered if it is practical

to do so, but the Commission is able to

assure consideration only for comments

received on or before this date. Written

comments on the application should be

mailed to the Chief, Rules Review and

Directives Branch, Office of

Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555 or

hand delivered to 11545 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, MD 20852 between 7:45 am

and 4:15 pm Federal workdays.

Comments should be legible and

reproducible, and include the name,

affiliation (if any), and address of the

commenter. All comments received by

the Commission will be made available

for public inspection at the

Commission’s Public Document Room

located in Washington, DC and the

Local Public Documents Rooms located

in Paducah, Kentucky and Portsmouth,

Ohio. In accordance with 10 CFR 76.62

and 76.64, a member of the public must

submit written comments or provide

oral comments at the public meeting

described below to petition the

Commission requesting review of the

Director’s decision on certification.

III. Notice of Public Meeting

The NRC will hold two meetings

concerning the applications for

certification for the Portsmouth and

Paducah gaseous diffusion plants. These

meetings are being held to solicit public

input on the initial certification of these

facilities. The meeting on the Paducah

Gaseous Diffusion Plant will be held at

the Paducah Information Age Park

Resource Center, 200 McCracken

Boulevard in Paducah, Kentucky on

May 23, 1995, 7 pm. The meeting on the

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant

will be held at the Vern Riffe Joint

Vocational School, 23365 State Rt. 124

in Piketon, Ohio on May 24, 1995, 7 pm.

In order to allow a maximum number

of speakers, statements by the public

will be limited to 5 minutes per

individual. Those interested in speaking

at the meetings may register in advance

or may register at the meeting. Any

person interested in registering in

advance may do so by sending a written

request to Ms. Rocio Castaneira, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,