1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12613 STIPULATION -008/00667916_1 RE (1) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Error! Unknown document property name. ; (2) SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Case No. 17-cv-00755

JEFFREY KALIEL, California Bar No. 238293

ANNICK M. PERSINGER, California Bar No. 272996

TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

483 Ninth Street, Suite 200

Oakland, CA 94607

Telephone (510) 254-6808

Facsimile (202) 973-0950

jkaliel@tzlegal.com

apersinger@tzlegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Additional Attorneys on Signature Page

Tomio B. Narita (SBN 156766)

Simmonds & Narita LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010

San Francisco, California 94104

(415) 283.1000

Fax (415) 352.2625

email: tnarita@snllp.com

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, 

GABRIELA PERDOMO ORTIZ, and VICTOR 

HUGO CATALAN MOLINA, individually and 

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

 

PLAINTIFFS,

vs.

LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-

50,

DEFENDANTS.

Case No. 4:17-cv-00755

STIPULATION FOR (1) FILING THE 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; 

AND (2) AMENDING THE SCHEDULE 

FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL ARBITRATION 

The Honorable Claudia Wilken

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 22 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION RE (1) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (2) SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Case No. 17-cv-00755

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, at the Initial Conference in this case, Plaintiffs agreed to 

provide a draft Second Amended Complaint to Defendant on that Friday, May 26, 2017. 

WHEREAS, on May 26, 2017, Plaintiffs sent counsel for Defendant a Second Amended 

Complaint for their review. 

WHEREAS, Defendant do not object to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint so long 

as the parties are able to establish a mutually agreeable briefing schedule for the motion to compel 

arbitration that Defendant intends to file in response to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. 

WHEREAS, Defendant has only consented to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint 

and does not waive any defense to Plaintiffs’ claims or the allegations in the Second Amended 

Complaint or Defendant’s right to move to compel arbitration.

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, at the Initial Conference in this case, prior to Plaintiffs’

sending of the Second Amended Complaint to Defendant, the Court set the following deadlines with 

respect to Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration: (a) Deadline for Defendant to file Motion to 

Compel Arbitration June 13, 2017; (b) Deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Motion to 

Compel Arbitration – August 1, 2017; (c) Deadline for Defendant to file its Reply in Support of 

Arbitration – August 15, 2017; (d) Hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration – August 

29, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. 

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed that good cause exists to amend the 

Motion to Compel Arbitration schedule to account for the filing of the Second Amended Complaint: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES: 

1. Plaintiffs shall file their Second Amended Complaint in the form sent to Defendant on May 

26, 2017, by June 9, 2017; 

2. Defendant shall file its Motion to Compel Arbitration by July 10, 2017; 

3. Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration by August 

24, 2017; 

4. Defendant shall file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Compel Arbitration by September 

7, 2017; and

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 22 Filed 06/02/17 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

STIPULATION RE (1) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (2) SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Case No. 17-cv-00755

5. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration shall be heard on September 21, 2017 at 2:30 

p.m. or on such other date convenient for the Court; 

6. All other deadlines shall remain the same. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: June 2, 2017 TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

By: /s/ Jeffrey Kaliel

 Jeffrey Kaliel

JEFFREY KALIEL, California Bar No. 238293

ANNICK M. PERSINGER, California Bar No. 272996

TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP

483 Ninth Street, Suite 200

Oakland, CA 94607

Telephone (510) 254-6808

Facsimile (202) 973-0950

jkaliel@tzlegal.com

apersinger@tzlegal.com

PAUL CHAVEZ, CA Bar No. 241576

JESSE NEWMARK, CA Bar No. 247488

AIDIN CASTILLO, CA Bar No. 280262

CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA

3400 E. 12th Street, Oakland, CA 94601

Telephone (510) 437-1554 

pchavez@centrolegal.org

jessenewmark@centrolegal.org

acastillo@centrolegal.org

NICHOLAS A. MIGLIACCIO, pro hac vice forthcoming

JASON S. RATHOD, pro hac vice forthcoming

MIGLICACCIO & RATHOD LLP

412 H St NE, Suite 302

Washington DC 20002

Telephone (202) 470-3520

nmigliaccio@classlawdc.com

jrathod@classlawdc.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 22 Filed 06/02/17 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

STIPULATION RE (1) SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (2) SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Case No. 17-cv-00755

Dated: June 2, 2017 SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP

By: /s/ Tomio B. Narita

 Tomio B. Narita 

Tomio B. Narita

Simmonds & Narita LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3010

San Francisco, California 94104

(415) 283.1000

Fax(415) 352.2625

email: tnarita@snllp.com

Attorneys for Defendant

ECF Signature Certification

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that the content of this document is 

acceptable to Tomio B. Narita, counsel for Defendant, and that I have obtained Mr. Narita’s 

authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document.

Dated: June 2, 2017 /s/ Jeffrey Kaliel

 Jeffrey Kaliel

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 22 Filed 06/02/17 Page 4 of 4