21008 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices

approximately Elmore Street, where milepost 243.0

and milepost 0.0 designate the same point.

The joint relocation project will

simplify and improve rail operations in

the Green Bay terminal area, permit the

removal of unnecessary trackage, and

relieve traffic congestion in the

surrounding area.

WCL and FVW state that no shippers

are located on either of the rail lines to

be abandoned and that no shippers will

be adversely affected by this joint

relocation project or lose access to any

rail service currently provided by WCL

or FVW. The joint project involves the

relocation of existing overhead

operations onto nearby, parallel rail

lines. It will not change service to

shippers, expand the operations of WCL

or FVW into new territory, or alter the

existing competitive balance.

The Commission will exercise

jurisdiction over the abandonment or

construction components of a relocation

project, and require separate approval or

exemption, only where the removal of

track affects service to shippers or the

construction of new track involves

expansion into new territory. See City of

Detroit v. Canadian National Ry. Co., et

al., 9 I.C.C.2d 1208 (1993). The

Commission has determined that line

relocation projects may embrace

trackage rights transactions such as the

one involved here. See D.T.&I.R.—

Trackage Rights, 363 I.C.C. 878 (1981).

Under these standards, the embraced

incidental abandonment, construction,

and trackage rights components require

no separate approval or exemption

when the relocation project, as here,

will not disrupt service to shippers and

thus qualifies for the class exemption at

49 CFR 1180.2(d)(5).

As a condition to the use of this

exemption, any employees affected by

the trackage rights agreement will be

protected by the conditions in Norfolk

and Western Ry. Co.—Trackage Rights—

BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified

in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.—Lease

and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).

Petitions to revoke the exemption

under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be filed

at any time. The filing of a petition to

revoke will not stay the transaction.

Pleadings must be filed with the

Commission and served on: Janet H.

Gilbert, Wisconsin Central Ltd. and Fox

Valley & Western Ltd., 6250 North River

Road, Suite 9000, Rosemont, IL 60018;

and Kevin M. Sheys, 1020 Nineteenth

Street, N.W., Suite 600, Washington, DC

20036.

Decided: April 24, 1995.

By the Commission, David M. Konschnik,

Director, Office of Proceedings.

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10491 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7035–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment Standards Administration

Wage and Hour Division; Minimum

Wages for Federal and Federally

Assisted Construction; General Wage

Determination Decisions

General wage determination decisions

of the Secretary of Labor are issued in

accordance with applicable law and are

based on the information obtained by

the Department of Labor from its study

of local wage conditions and data made

available from other sources. They

specify the basic hourly wage rates and

fringe benefits which are determined to

be prevailing for the described classes of

laborers and mechanics employed on

construction projects of a similar

character and in the localities specified

therein.

The determinations in these decisions

of prevailing rates and fringe benefits

have been made in accordance with 29

CFR Part 1, by authority of the Secretary

of Labor pursuant to the provisions of

the Davis-Bacon Act of March 3, 1931,

as amended (46 Stat. 1494, as amended,

40 U.S.C. 276a) and of other Federal

statutes referred to in 29 CFR part 1,

appendix, as well as such additional

statutes as may from time to time be

enacted containing provisions for the

payment of wages determined to be

prevailing by the Secretary of Labor in

accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act.

The prevailing rates and fringe benefits

determined in these decisions shall, in

accordance with the provisions of the

foregoing statutes, constitute the

minimum wages payable on Federal and

federally assisted construction projects

to laborers and mechanics of the

specified classes engaged on contract

work of the character and in the

localities described therein.

Good cause is hereby found for not

utilizing notice and public comment

procedure thereon prior to the issuance

of these determinations as prescribed in

5 U.S.C. 553 and not providing for delay

in the effective date as prescribed in that

section, because the necessity to issue

current construction industry wage

determinations frequently and in large

volume causes procedures to be

impractical and contrary to the public

interest.

General wage determination

decisions, and modifications and

supersedeas decisions thereto, contain

no expiration dates and are effective

from their date of notice in the Federal

Register, or on the date written notice

is received by the agency, whichever is

earlier. These decisions are to be used

in accordance with the provisions of 29

CFR parts 1 and 5. Accordingly, the

applicable decision, together with any

modifications issued, must be made a

part of every contract for performance of

the described work within the

geographic area indicated as required by

an applicable Federal prevailing wage

law and 29 CFR part 5. The wage rates

and fringe benefits, notice of which is

published herein, and which are

contained in the Government Printing

Office (GPO) document entitled

‘‘General Wage Determinations Issued

Under The Davis-Bacon And Related

Acts,’’ shall be the minimum paid by

contractors and subcontractors to

laborers and mechanics.

Any person, organization, or

governmental agency having an interest

in the rates determined as prevailing is

encouraged to submit wage rate and

fringe benefit information for

consideration by the Department.

Further information and selfexplanatory forms for the purpose of

submitting this data may be obtained by

writing to the U.S. Department of Labor,

Employment Standards Administration,

Wage and Hour Division, Division of

Wage Determinations, 200 Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Room S–3014,

Washington, D.C. 20210.

Withdrawn General Wage

Determination Decision

This is to advise all interested parties

that the Department of Labor is

withdrawing, from the date of this

notice, General Wage Determination No.

TX950109 dated February 10, 1995.

Agencies with construction projects

pending, to which this wage decision

would have been applicable, should

utilize Wage Decision TX950001.

Contracts for which bids have been

opened shall not be affected by this

notice. Also, consistent with 29 CFR

1.6(c)(2)(i)(A), when the opening of bids

is less than ten (10) days from the date

of this notice, this action shall be

effective unless the agency finds that

there is insufficient time to notify

bidders of the change and the finding is

documented in the contract file.

New General Wage Determination

Decisions

The number of the decisions added to

the Government Printing Office

document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determination Issued Under the Davis-
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Notices 21009

Bacon and Related Acts’’ are listed by

Volume and State:

VOLUME V

Nebraska

NE950059 (APR.28,1995)

NE950060 (APR.28,1995)

Modification to General Wage

Determination Decisions

The number of decisions listed in the

Government Printing Office document

entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations

Issued Under the Davis-Bacon and

Related Acts’’ being modified are listed

by Volume and State. Dates of

publication in the Federal Register are

in parentheses following the decisions

being modified.

VOLUME I

Massachusetts

MA950001 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950002 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950003 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950009 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950017 (FEB.10,1995)

MA950019 (FEB.10,1995)

New York

NY950077 (FEB.17,1995)

Rhode Island

RI950001 (FEB.10,1995)

RI950002 (FEB.10,1995)

RI950003 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME II

Delaware

DE950001 (FEB.10,1995)

DE950002 (FEB.10,1995)

DE950005 (FEB.10,1995)

DE950009 (FEB.10,1995)

Pennsylvania

PA950010 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME III

Georgia

GA950040 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME IV

Michigan

MI950001 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950002 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950003 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950004 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950005 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950007 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950012 (FEB.10,1995)

MI950017 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME V

Iowa

IA950005 (FEB.10,1995)

Kansas

KS950006 (FEB.10,1995)

KS950008 (FEB.10,1995)

KS950012 (FEB.10,1995)

Missouri

MO950003 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950005 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950007 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950010 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950014 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950016 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950020 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950046 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950053 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950056 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950059 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950063 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950064 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950066 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950068 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950069 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950070 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950074 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950075 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950076 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950077 (FEB.10,1995)

MO950078 (FEB.10,1995)

Nebraska

NE950001 (FEB.10,1995)

NE950002 (FEB.10,1995)

NE950007 (FEB.10,1995)

Oklahoma

OK950013 (FEB.10,1995)

OK950018 (FEB.10,1995)

VOLUME VI

None

General Wage Determination

Publication

General wage determinations issued

under the Davis-Bacon and Related

Acts, including those noted above, may

be found in the Government Printing

Office (GPO) document entitled

‘‘General Wage Determinations Issued

Under the Davis-Bacon and Related

Acts’’. This publication is available at

each of the 50 Regional Government

Depository Libraries and many of the

1,400 Government Depository Libraries

across the country.

The general wage determinations

issued under the Davis-Bacon and

related Acts are available electronically

by subscription to the FedWorld

Bulletin Board System of the National

Technical Information Service (NTIS) of

the U.S. Department of Commerce at

(703) 487–4630.

Hard-copy subscriptions may be

purchased from: Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Printing

Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, (202)

512–1800.

When ordering hard-copy

subscription(s), be sure to specify the

State(s) of interest, since subscriptions

may be ordered for any or all of the six

separate volumes, arranged by State.

Subscriptions include an annual edition

(issued in January or February) which

includes all current general wage

determinations for the States covered by

each volume. Throughout the remainder

of the year, regular weekly updates will

be distributed to subscribers.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of

April 1995.

Alan L. Moss,

Director, Division of Wage Determinations.

[FR Doc. 95–10353 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–29–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50–254 and 50–265]

Commonwealth Edison Co.; Notice of

Consideration of Issuance of

Amendments to Facility Operating

Licenses, Proposed No Significant

Hazards Consideration Determination,

and Opportunity for a Hearing

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (the Commission) is

considering issuance of amendments to

Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–29

and DPR–30 issued to Commonwealth

Edison Company (ComEd, the licensee)

for operation of the Quad Cities Nuclear

Power Station, Units 1 and 2, located in

Rock Island County, Illinois.

The proposed amendments would

change the Technical Specifications by:

(1) Revising the low pressure value at

which the High Pressure Coolant

Injection (HPCI) and Reactor Core

Isolation Cooling (RCIC) systems can be

tested to 150 psig, and (2) to test these

systems against a system head

corresponding to reactor vessel pressure

when steam is supplied to the turbines

at 920 psig to 1005 psig for high

pressure testing and 150 psig to 325 psig

for low pressure testing.

Before issuance of the proposed

license amendments, the Commission

will have made findings required by the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended

(the Act) and the Commission’s

regulations.

The Commission has made a

proposed determination that the

amendment request involves no

significant hazards consideration. Under

the Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR

50.92, this means that operation of the

facility in accordance with the proposed

amendments would not (1) involve a

significant increase in the probability or

consequences of an accident previously

evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of

a new or different kind of accident from

any accident previously evaluated; or

(3) involve a significant reduction in a

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its

analysis of the issue of no significant

hazards consideration, which is

presented below:

(1) Involve a significant increase in the

probability or consequences of an accident

previously evaluated because:

The proposed changes revise the testing

requirements for the low pressure HPCI and

RCIC systems, and as such do not affect any

accident precursors or initiators. Therefore,

the proposed changes do not increase the

probability of any previously evaluated

accident.

Similarly, the proposed changes

implement testing requirements which will