alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERT DYTCH,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTONIO MAGANA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00438-SI 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

STRIKE

Re: Dkt. No. 25

Plaintiff Albert Dytch filed a motion to strike defendant Maxaco, LLC’s (“Maxaco’s”) 

answer, Dkt. No. 13, because Maxaco improperly appeared pro se and needs to be represented by 

counsel. See Mot. to Strike (Dkt. No. 25) at 2 (citing Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 

U.S. 194, 196 (1993)). Maxaco has not filed a response to plaintiff’s motion, nor has it retained 

counsel to represent it in this action.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to strike is GRANTED. Maxaco is hereby ORDERED to 

appear through counsel within two weeks of the date of this order. If no appearance 

through counsel is filed, defendant Maxaco may be found in default.

This order resolves Dkt. No. 25.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2017

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge
Steven ACHORD, et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF FIRE

NO. 2019-C-0506

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Reliabrand, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period from ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Antal Markus

Antal Markus

CFO

Dated: September 28, 2011





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
R.C.O., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4515

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 23, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Kasey Helms Lacey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

On appeal, R.C.O. raises two issues. First, R.C.O. argues that the trial court erred in finding him guilty of the lesser-included offense of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon because the petition for delinquency did not contain the necessary elements for that lesser-included offense. Because we find the first issue dispositive, we decline to address R.C.O.'s second issue.

The petition for delinquency alleged that R.C.O. committed an aggravated battery upon his mother by intentionally touching or striking her against her will and while doing so, used a deadly weapon. After the parties presented all of the evidence, the trial court found R.C.O. guilty of the category two lesser-included offense of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon. One of the necessary elements of improper exhibition of a dangerous weapon is exhibiting the weapon in a "rude, careless, angry, or threatening manner." § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (2018) ; Fla. Std. Jury Instr.

*845(Crim) 10.5. Because the petition for delinquency did not include this element, we are compelled to reverse. *See**K.D. v. State* , 69 So. 3d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (vacating adjudication for trespass in a conveyance because the petition for delinquency failed to include a necessary element of the permissive lesser-included offense).

REVERSED .

Lewis and Roberts, JJ., concur; B.L. Thomas, J., dissents without opinion.
Rontarian WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2597

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Northern District of California

U.S.A., ex rel. FALLON, et al.

BELL TRANSIT CORPORATION, et al.

3:16-cv-06994-TSH

Defendant Bell Transit Corporation

06/01/2020 /s/ John T. Cu

John T. Cu (SBN 207402)

Hanson Bridgett LLP

425 Market Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94015

jcu@hansonbridgett.com

(415) 777-3200

(415) 541-9366

Case 4:16-cv-06994-PJH Document 40 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 1
Danny R. DUSTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3579

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
N. R., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0430

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Darrell C. EDMOND, petitioner, v. Marty ALLEN, Warden.

No. 12-9495.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

LEWIS DOMINIC SHAW,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. THOMAS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00462-YGR (PR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION TO 

CHANGE TIME TO FILE A 

DISPOSITIVE MOTION

Defendants N. Adam, D. Alpaugh, B. Fellows, D. George, N. Ikegbu, D. Jacobsen, 

M. McLean, S. Risenhoover, M. Sayre, L. Thomas, and D. Venes (Defendants) filed a second 

motion to change the deadline to file a dispositive motion, from January 15, 2018 to March 1, 

2018. The Court has read and considered Defendants’ motion and the accompanying declaration 

of counsel, and finds that good cause exists to grant the motion. 

Accordingly, Defendants’ second motion to change time to file a dispositive motion is 

GRANTED. The time for Defendants to file their motion is changed to March 1, 2018. 

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion must be served and filed no more than twenty-eight 

(28) days after the Defendants’ motion is served and filed. Defendants shall file their reply no 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

))

more than fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff’s opposition is entered in the Court’s docket. The 

motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply is filed. 

The Court notes that this is the second extension in this case. The granting of regular 

requests for extension should not be expected.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________________ __________________________

THE HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

January 19, 2018
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

1 of 2 

BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP 

MICHAEL W. KNAPP (SBN 200422) 

mknapp@bradley.com 

Hearst Tower 

214 North Tryon Street, Suite 3700 

Charlotte, NC 28201 

Telephone: (704) 338-6004 

Facsimile: (704) 338-6096 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

JOHN R. HEISSE (SBN 134964) 

john.heisse@pillsburylaw.com 

WILLIAM S. HALE (SBN 260414) 

william.hale@pillsburylaw.com 

LAURA C. HURTADO (SBN 267044) 

laura.hurtado@pillsburylaw.com 

Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111-5998 

Telephone: (415) 983-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 

Craig E. Guenther, bar No. 126134 

ceguenther@boothmitchel.com

Booth, Mitchel & Strange LLP 

701 South Parker Street, Suite 6500 

Orange, CA 92868-4733 

(714) 480-8500 / Fax: (714) 480-8533 

Attorneys for Defendant North American 

Specialty Insurance Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

San Francisco 

Kirlin Builders, LLC, f/k/a John J. Kirlin 

Special Projects, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

North American Specialty Insurance 

Company, 

 Defendants. 

Case Number: 3:17-cv-00608 JST 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

 

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIM 

 
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

2 of 2 

 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following 

stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the 

following ADR process: 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 

 Private ADR (specify process and provider) 

Kirlin Builders, LLC (“Kirlin”) and North American 

Surety Specialty Insurance Company (“NAS”) have 

agreed to private mediation with a private mediator. 

These parties will request Cross-Defendants, Federal 

Solutions Group, Inc., dba Federal Construction; BARA 

Infoware, Inc.; Selina Singh; and Manjidar P. Singh to 

participate in the private mediation after they have 

answered. Cost of mediator will be split equally by all 

participants. 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to 

ADR, unless otherwise ordered. )

 other requested deadline: Kirlin and NAS request the deadline be set 180 days from the 

date of the order referring the case to ADR 

Date: 

Date: 

 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

 

Attorney for Defendant 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:

Date: 

U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Private ADR.”

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct 

mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an 

early settlement conference with a Magistrate 

Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this 

form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR 

L.R. 3-5.

^éêáä=ONI=OMNT April 21, 2017 /s/ Laura C. Hurtado X

April 24, 2017
'Hon.T. M. Trimble OpinionNo. O-3352

First Assistant State SuperintendentPublic Instruction Re: Annexation of Territory Austin, Texas to Junior CollegeDistrict
Dear Sir:
We are in receipt of your request for an opinion of March 28, 

### 1941,concerninga junior college district forGalveston County,which is accompanied by letters from the County School Superintendent and Presidentof the Board of Trustees of the City of Galveston.

It appears that the City of Galvestonmany years ago assumed control of the public schoolswithin its limits and in 

### 1935 created by vote of its citizens,as provided in Article 2815h,Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, a Junior College District within said city. Subsequently,an attempt to vote a maintenance tax for the Junior College District was defeatedand the Junior College for that reason has not functioned as suoh. A movement has been instituted to bring this Junior College District into operation and also extend it so as to include the remainder of the County outside the City of Galveston. Several questions are asked concerningthe procedure to be followedwith reference to Sections 

### 4 and 

### 17, of Article 2815h,Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes,bowever we think the procedure set in Section 21 of said statute adequately disposes of the various inquiries.

Section 21 of Article 2815h,Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, reads as follows:

Wet. 21. (Annexationof districts to junior college district.)- An independent school district, or districts,a common school district or districts, may be annexed to a junior college district for junior collegepurposes only, by an election as provided in Section 2 hereof, uponpetition of five per cent of the property taxpayingvoters in such district or districts seeking to be annexed,provided further that such annexation shallhave beenpreviously approved by the board of trustees of the junior college district and provided further that election for suah annexation shall be called and the results canvassedHon. T.M. Trimble,page 2, 

### (O-3352)

and declared by the aountyboard of eduoation or the county commissioners's court of the county, in oase there is no county board of education, provided further that the territory included in such annexed district shall thereby assume its share or any outstanding bonded indebtedness of the junror oollegedistrict, in proportion to the assessedvaluationwithin the said district, and shall also beaome liable for taxes formaintaining the junior college."
It is our opinion that a junior collegedistrict including all the territory in Galveston Countymay be formed by following the annexationprocedureprovided in the above quoted statute. It would also be necessary, of course, to vote a maintenanae tax for said district.
Yours very truly
ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS By /c/ Cecil C. Cammack Cecil C, Cammack,Assistant
APPROVEDMAY 

### 7, 1941 /s/ Grover Sellers FIRST ASSISTANTATTORNEY GENERAL APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE BY: BWB, CHAIRMAN CCC:lh:wb
# L_2018259EN.01004302.xml

| 16.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 259/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 259/43

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1524 of 11 October 2018 establishing a monitoring methodology and the arrangements for reporting by Member States in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 256 of 12 October 2018
  )

On the cover and on page 108:

for:

‘
  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1524 of 11 October 2018 establishing a monitoring methodology and the arrangements for reporting by Member States in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies
  (notified under document C(2018) 6560)
  ’,

read:

‘
  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1524 of 11 October 2018 establishing a monitoring methodology and the arrangements for reporting by Member States in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies
  ’.

---
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB. d/b/a Christiana Trust, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Hector GOMEZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4641

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 05, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Case 4:05-cr-00308-DLJ Document 24 Filed 10/21/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:05-cr-00308-DLJ Document 24 Filed 10/21/05 Page 2 of 2
ITEM 6. (A)

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR NET INCOME PER SHARE)


                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    MARCH  31,
                                               ------------------
                                                 2001      2000
                                               --------  --------
Net income                                     $  8,404  $  6,360
Less:  Preferred stock dividend                      41        42
                                               --------  --------
Net income applicable to common stock          $  8,363  $  6,318

Weighted average common shares outstanding      936,158   938,902

Net Income per common share-basic and diluted  $   8.93  $   6.73


<PAGE>
Case No. 17-cv-00447 NC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YAHOO! INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

PITTSBURGH, PA,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00447 NC 

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Court’s June 2, 2017, order granting defendant’s motion to 

dismiss with leave to amend, and plaintiff’s subsequent request that the Court enter 

judgment in this case, judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff with 

respect to all claims asserted in the complaint. 

The clerk is ordered to terminate case no. 17-cv-00447 NC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 29, 2017 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00447-NC Document 39 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 20159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10137]



      


                Sunshine Act Meetings



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 1995 / 
Sunshine Act Meetings
[[Page 20159]] 


UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS



Notice of a Meeting

    The Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service, 
pursuant to its Bylaws (39 C.F.R. Section 7.5) and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. Section 552b), hereby gives notice that it 
intends to hold a meeting at 1:00 p.m. on Monday, May 1, 1995, and at 
8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 2, 1995, in New York, New York.
    The May 1 meeting is closed to the public. (See 60 FR 19624, April 
19, 1995). The May 2 meeting is open to the public and will be held at 
The Hotel Inter-Continental, 111 East 48th Street, in the Whitney Room. 
The Board expects to discuss the matters stated in the agenda which is 
set forth below. Requests for information about the meeting should be 
addressed to the Secretary for the Board, David F. Harris, at (202) 
268-4800.

Agenda

Monday Session

May 1-1:00 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Consideration of a Filing with the Postal Rate Commission for 
an Experimental Category of Automatable, Prebarcoded First-Class and 
Priority Parcels Under Commission Rule 67. (Cathy Rogerson, Manager, 
New Business Opportunities)

Tuesday Session

May 2-8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, April 3-4, 1995.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer. 
(Marvin Runyon.)
    3. Capital Investments.

    a. South River, New Jersey, Material Distribution Center. 
        (Informational Briefing, Darrah Porter, Vice President, 
        Purchasing)
    b. Santa Barbara, California, Processing & Distribution Center. 
        (Final Decision, Gene R. Howard, Vice President, Pacific 
        Area Operations; and Rudolph K. Umscheid, Vice President, 
        Facilities)

    4. Quarterly Report on Service Performance. (Jeffrey P. Kaneff, 
Manager, External Measurement Systems.)
    5. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance. (Michael J. Riley, 
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance.)
    6. Report on the New York Metro Area and the Apartment 
Readdressing Program. (John F. Kelly, Vice President, New York Metro 
Area Operations.)
    7. Tentative Agenda for the June 5-6, 1995, meeting in Austin, 
Texas.
David F. Harris,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95-10137 Filed 4-20-95; 2:21 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
Ray S. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3535

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl
Ritter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | /s/
      Carl Ritter        
| | -----------------------------
| | Carl Ritter                  
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (principal executive officer)
| | June 14, 2007                

---
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Enterprise Acquisition Corp. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Ezra Shashoua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company./s/ Ezra ShashouaEzra ShashouaMarch 16, 2009Chief Financial Officer
Case 4:17-mj-70004-MAG Document 4 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 1
Sean MCCOY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Rafeh Hulays, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Netfone, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Netfone, Inc. for the nine month period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Netfone, Inc.

Date: August 15, 2005
| /s/ Rafeh Hulays |
|------------------|

Rafeh Hulays

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial 

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)