alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                          TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               RULE 13a-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Textron Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ted R. French, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                           Textron Financial Corporation


                                           /s/ Ted R. French
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ted R. French
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 9, 2004













                                       39
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q DATED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               37
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                          83
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       120
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2656
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2619
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE 

FORMER EMERYVILLE 

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE 

CITY OF EMERYVILLE,

Plaintiff,

v.

SWAGELOK COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00308-WHO 

ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 174

The parties have a discovery dispute concerning the depositions of several former 

executives of HBML who have knowledge about the transactions that are the basis for the claims 

of alter ego against HBML. HBML wants to take their deposition now in a time-limited way to 

preserve their testimony, as the witnesses range in age from 60s to 80s. The other parties want to 

take a discovery deposition of them before the trial deposition.

Given that these witnesses appear to be central to the claim of alter ego, their testimony 

should be as clearly presented to the jury as possible. While HBML would be able to present its 

own witnesses clearly on direct, without a discovery deposition coherent cross-examination would 

be very difficult. At the same time, HBML points out that these depositions have been continued 

for months and the moving parties here have not tried to take them. If the witnesses are important, 

their testimony should be preserved.

In light of those competing concerns, I ORDER that the parties meet and confer to agree 

on a schedule for these witnesses that allows completion of discovery depositions of no more than 

7 hours per witness by November 30, 2020. They may be conducted via remote means. If HBML 

wishes to conduct a further deposition for trial purposes thereafter, it may do so, scheduling the 

Case 3:17-cv-00308-WHO Document 175 Filed 09/29/20 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

trial deposition at least thirty days after the discovery deposition for that witness and no earlier 

than December 7, 2020. The moving parties are limited in their cross-examination of that trial 

testimony to no more than three times the length of the direct examination in total, absent 

agreement or leave of court.

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 29, 2020

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

1

I have chosen this limit because I do not want the trial cross-examination to turn into a second 

discovery deposition. The parties are free to agree that more or less time is required once they 

know the import of each witness’s testimony.

Case 3:17-cv-00308-WHO Document 175 Filed 09/29/20 Page 2 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Proposed Order Granting Dismissal of Case With Prejudice 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-00865-RS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION 

LILIANA MARTINEZ 

 Plaintiff, 

 -againstSTELLAR RECOVERY, INC. 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00865-RS 

The Hon. Richard Seeborg 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITH 

PREJUDICE 

[Filed concurrently with Stipulation] 

Complaint Filed: 2/22/17 Answer Filed: 3/21/17

Case 3:17-cv-00865-RS Document 20 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Proposed Order Granting Dismissal of Case With Prejudice 

 Case No. 3:17-cv-00865-RS 

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice, 

and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED 

 1. The case is hereby dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear their 

respective costs and attorney’s fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date:___________________ ________________________________ 

 HON. RICHARD SEEBORG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

5/16/17

Case 3:17-cv-00865-RS Document 20 Filed 05/16/17 Page 2 of 2
----

|   | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/    | Terrance M. McCarthy                  |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Terrance M. McCarthy                  |
|   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

----
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20680-20681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10292]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP94-220-008, RP95-187-002 and TM95-2-37-002]

Northwest Pipeline Corp.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

April 21, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 17, 1995, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff the 
following [[Page 20681]] tariff sheets with a proposed effective date 
of April 1, 1995 to comply with the Commission's March 31, 1995 Order 
in Docket Nos. RP95-187-000 and TM95-2-37-000:

Third Revised Volume No. 1

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 5-A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 8

Original Volume No. 2

Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 2
Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 2.1
Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 2-A

    On March 1, 1995 in Docket No. RP95-187-000, Northwest filed 
primary and alternate proposed tariff sheets to implement new fuel use 
requirements factors with an effective date of April 1, 1995. On March 
31, 1995, the Commission accepted Northwest's primary tariff sheets 
subject to refund and conditions, and subject to the outcome of a 
technical conference. The Commission's March 31, 1995 Order was 
conditioned on Northwest filing certain workpapers by April 17, 1995 
and filing revised tariff sheets.
    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to submit the 
revised tariff sheets. Northwest states that the revised tariff sheets 
reflect the removal of certain costs related to lost and unaccounted-
for gas from Northwest's current base tariff rates in Docket No. RP94-
220. Northwest further states that the aforementioned workpapers are 
being filed concurrently in Docket No. RP95-187.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
Northwest's jurisdictional customers, upon all intervenors in Docket 
Nos. RP94-220, RP95-187 and TM95-2-37, and upon relevant state 
regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 
385.211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such 
protests should be filed on or before April 28, 1995. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10292 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Darrell K. WILSON Sr., Appellant, v. CREDO LLC, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D16-2725

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal American Financial Corp. (the "Registrant") for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard A. Barasch, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Robert A. Waegelein,
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Richard A. BaraschRichard A. Barasch
Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2005

/s/ Robert A. WaegeleinRobert A. Waegelein
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00090-CR

Jose Flores FRANCO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 112th Judicial District Court, Sutton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2355

Honorable Pedro Gomez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Court reporters Corina E. Lozano and Cindy Wilde have filed a notification of late 

reporter’s record, requesting additional time to file the reporter’s record. We grant the request 

and ORDER Corina E. Lozano and Cindy Wilde to file the reporter’s record on or before May 

13, 2016. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22379-22380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11129]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP93-6-013]


Paiute Pipeline Company; Re-Notice of Refund Report\1\

    \1\This filing is being re-noticed because of an error in 
Federal Register publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 1, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 13, 1995, Paiute Pipeline Company 
(Paiute), submitted a refund report reflecting refunds of $4,978,057.41 
received from various companies, pursuant to Commission orders issued 
on September 29, 1994 (70 FERC 61,038).
    Paiute states that on March 6, 1995, and March 23, 1995, Paiute 
refunded amounts to its jurisdictional storage and 
[[Page 22380]] transportation customers, inclusive of principal and 
interest.
    Any person desiring to protect said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). 
All such protests should be filed on or before May 9, 1995. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-11129 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-4131]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

North American Wetlands Conservation Council; Availability of 
Document

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that a final document, U.S. 
Grant Application Instructions Package For Funding Consideration 
Through the North American Wetlands Conservation Council Under 
Authority of North American Wetlands Conservation Act, is available.

DATES: Proposals may be submitted at any time. FY 1996 proposals will 
be accepted through August 4, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Copies of this document can be obtained by contacting the 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Publications Unit, Mail Stop 130 Webb, 
4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203 during normal business hours 
(7:45 am-4:15 pm) in writing or by phone (703) 358-1711.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Robert Streeter, Coordinator, 
North American Wetlands Conservation Council at (703) 358-1784.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document provides the schedules, review 
criteria, definitions, description of information required in the 
proposal, and a format for proposals submitted for Fiscal Year 1996 
funding. This document was prepared to comply with the ``North American 
Wetlands Conservation Act.'' the Act established a North American 
Wetlands Conservation Council. This Federal-State-Private body annually 
recommends wetland acquisition, restoration, and enhancement 
conservation projects to the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission. 
These project recommendations will be selected from proposals made in 
accordance with this document. Proposals from State and private 
sponsors require a minimum of 50 percent non-Federal matching funds.

    Dated: January 17, 1995.
Mollie H. Beattie,
Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 94-4131 Filed 2-17-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Gerard FRANCOIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-422

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Larry Leonard RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ex10-3.htm


    Exhibit
10.3

     

     

     

    
       

      EXERCISE
OF OPTION TO EXTEND AND

      AMENDMENT
NO.1

      TO

      CHARTER
PARTY DATED OCTOBER 6, 2005

      (THE
“CHARTERPARTY”)

      BETWEEN

      ANN
TANKER CORPORATION (THE “OWNERS”)

      AND
DHT ANN VLCC CORP. (THE “CHARTERERS”)

      FOR
THE VESSEL

      OVERSEAS
ANN

       

      Pursuant
to clause 99 of the Charterparty, the Charterers hereby declare, as of November
26, 2008, the exercise of the first 12 months of the option period which shall
commence on 

      April 17,
2012 at 0001 hours GMT and end on April 16, 2013 at 2400 hours GMT (the “Option Period”).

       

      As of the
date of this agreement, the Owners and the Charterers hereby amend the terms of
the Charterparty as follows:

       

      (1) Notwithstanding clause
99, the rate during the Option Period shall, at the option of the Charterers,
be:

      


      
        
          	 
      	
                  a)

                	
                  usd
      38,500 per day during the period
      from April 17, 2012 at 0001 hours GMT until October 16, 2012 at 2400 hours
      GMT and usd 38,800
      per day during the period from October 17, 2012 at 0001 hours GMT
      until April 16, 2013 at 2400 hours;
      or

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  b)

                	
                  the
      market rate as determined by the Association of Shipbrokers Agents and
      Agents Tanker Broker Panel plus five percent provided, however, that the rate
      payable during the Option Period shall never be less than usd 33,500 per
day.

                


        

      

       

      (2)
Except as expressly amended by this agreement, the terms and conditions of the
Charterparty remain unchanged and in full force and effect including, without
limitation, the profit sharing arrangement between the Owners and the
Charterers.

       

       

      
         

        January
15, 2009

         

        
          
            
              	For
      Ann Tanker Corporation	 	 	For
      DHT Ann VLCC Corp.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                      By: 
      /s/ Ole Jacob Diesen

                    	 	 	
                      By:
      /s/ Mats Berglund

                    	 
	
                      Name:  Ole
      Jacob Diesen

                    	 	 	
                      Name:  Mats
      Berglund

                    	 
	
                      Title:    Vice
      President 

                    	 	 	
                      Title:    Senior
      Vice President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKEY B. DELONEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

GREENWOOD, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00656-JD 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 2

Plaintiff, a detainee, has filed a civil rights action. Plaintiff was sent a notice that he had 

not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

(“IFP”). He was allowed twenty-eight days to either pay the fee or file a proper application with 

all the required documents. More than twenty-eight days has passed and plaintiff has not paid the 

fee or filed a complete application to proceed IFP. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED without 

prejudice. Plaintiff’s incomplete motion to proceed IFP (Docket No. 2) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2017

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00656-JD Document 7 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKEY B. DELONEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

GREENWOOD, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00656-JD 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on March 28, 2017, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by 

placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery 

receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Rickey B. DeLoney ID: CC161U055

901 Court Street

Martinez, CA 94553 

Dated: March 28, 2017

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

By:________________________

LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the 

Honorable JAMES DONATO

Case 3:17-cv-00656-JD Document 7 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 2