alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John J. Quicke, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Adaptec, Inc. for the quarter ended January 1, 2010 (the Form 10-Q), that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the quarterly periods covered by the Form 10-Q.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN J. QUICKE          
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | John J. Quicke                 
|Date: February 3, 2010 |  |  |  |     |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer

I, Mary
L. Dotz, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Form 10-Q, that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Adaptec, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-Q.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    MARY L. DOTZ    
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Mary L. Dotz           
|Date: February 3, 2010 |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
### NO. 12-14003S2-CR

STATE OF TEXAS

DAVID LYNN SELLERS § INTHE § § 12th COURT § § OF APPEALS VS.

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: Now comes David Lynn Sellers, Appellant in the above styled and numbered case, before the decision in this Court has been delivered, and respectfully moves this Court to withdraw appellant's notice of appeal and dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant has signed a letter of his intent to dismiss the appeal, and has sworn under oath in the 392ND Judicial District Court his desire to no longer appeal. The letter indicating that the Appellant no longer wishes to pursue appeal is attached hereto. Respectfully submitted, CHRlSTOPHER D TINSLEY PC PO Box 832 115 BE. Tyler Athens, Texas 75751 Tel: (903) 677-1802 Fax: (903)677-1850 ACCEPTED 12-1400352-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 1/14/2015 11:06:40 AM

CATHY LUSK CLERKchris@tinsleypc.com Attorney for David Lynn Sellers

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on January 13, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Henderson County, Texas, by facsimile.STATE OF TEXAS § 

### § COUNTY OF HENDERSON § AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Christopher D. Tinsley, who after being duly sworn stated: "I am the attorney for the appellant in the above numbered and entitled cause. I have read the foregoing Motion to Dismiss Appeal and swear that all of the allegations offact contained therein are true and correct."



### SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME

## on~fUJ..OJU1 

# 1#-, 2015, to certify which witness my hand and seal ofoffice.
Notary Public,

### CHRISTOPHER 

## D. TINSLEY, P.C. AlTORNEY AND COUNSELOR ATLAW 117 E.'Jyler • P.O. Box 750 • Athens, Texas 75751 PHONE: 903~677-1802 • FAX: 903~677-1850

January 7,2015

Re: Case No: 12-1400352-CR,12-14-00353-CR Style: David Lynn Sellers v. The State ofTexas
I,David Lynn Sellers hereby authorize Christopher D.Tinsley to dismiss mypending appeals Case No: 12-1400352-CR, 12-14-00353-CR, inthe Twelfth Court ofAppeals. Inolonger wishtopursue an appeal ofmy convictions regarding Case No: 12-l400352-CR, 12-14-00353-CR, in the 392nd Judicial District Court, Henderson County, Texas.



### _6..::;..~_--=--~'-'<.~~

__ Date 

### I~

## J~; 

# J5' David Lynn Sellers
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 9, 2016

Order 

Clerk

November 9, 2016

153194(21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 153194

v COA: 330799 

Chippewa CC: 14-001527-FC

CRISTY JEAN WILSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time

for filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

filed on October 31, 2016, is accepted for filing.
EX-34.1
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
JPMorgan Chase Tower
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, TX 75201-6778
USA

Tel: +1 214 840 7000
www.deloitte.com


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors
Centerline Servicing Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Centerline Servicing Inc. (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Company acted as
servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the "Platform") as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)-l122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and
1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to
selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform.
Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for all transactions for which the Company acted as servicer
involving first lien commercial mortgage loans is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

February 28, 2008

Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Mary A. JOHNSTON a/k/a Mary Ann Johnston, Appellant, v. JAMES B. NUTTER & COMPANY; the Unknown Heirs, Beneficiaries, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees and All Others Who May Claim an Interest in the Estate of Robert G. Johnston, Deceased; Robert Johnston, Jr. a/k/a Robert Gary Johnston, Jr.; Amy Johnston a/k/a Amy L. Johnston; Elizabeth Wager a/k/a Elizabeth Marie Wager; United State of America, Acting of Behalf of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; Any and All Unknown Parties Claiming by, Through, Under, and Against the Herein Named Individual Defendant(s) Who are Not Known to be Dead or Alive, Whether Said Unknown Parties May Claim an Interest as Spouses, Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, or Other Claimants, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-493

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed 

Order Selecting Private ADR.” 

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

 

 Defendant(s) 

CASE No C 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following 

stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the 

following ADR process: 

 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

 Private ADR (specify process and provider) 

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 

 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, 

unless otherwise ordered. ) 

 other requested deadline: 

 Date: 

Date: 

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: 

Date: 

 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct 

mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an 

early settlement conference with a Magistrate 

Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for 

ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this 

form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR 

L.R. 3-5.

Reset Form UNITED VAN LINES, LLC, SCOTT and SARAH DEMING, 3:17-cv-00390-JST ■

■

4/24/17 /s/ 4/24/17 /s/ Print Form April 27, 2017
NO. 07-02-0356-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

DECEMBER 10, 2002

______________________________

ESAU RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 222ND DISTRICT COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY;

NO. CR99K-099; HON. DAVID WESLEY GULLEY, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Esau Rodriguez appeals from a judgment convicting him of attempted

sexual assault. The clerk’s record is due in this cause, and an extension of the applicable

deadline was sought. To justify the extension, the district clerk represented that appellant

has failed to 1) file a written designation for the clerk’s record, 2) file a written designation

for the reporter’s record and 3) pay or make arrangements to pay for the record. This is

the second request filed by the district clerk. The first request was based on the same
2

reasons that are before us now. Nothing of record appears showing the appellant is

indigent and entitled to a free record. 

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 222nd District

Court of Deaf Smith County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial

court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a

hearing to determine the following: 

 1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

 2. whether appellant is indigent; and, 

 3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings

of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed

a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and

all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be

developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental

record with the clerk of this court on or before January 10, 2003. Should further time be

needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before

January 10, 2003. 

 It is so ordered. 

 Per Curiam 

Do not publish. 
3
**Exhibit 33.6**

**Management’s Assertion on**

**Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria**

BancTec, Inc. (“BancTec” or the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing its compliance, as ofand for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”), with certain servicing criteria applicable to it in connection with the Services Agreement dated as of September 30, 2008, as amended, (the “ServicesAgreement”) between BancTec, Inc. and DB Servicing Corporation (“DBSC”), assignee of, DFS Services LLC (“DFS”). As a result of the assignment of the Services Agreement by DFS, an affiliate of Discover Bank, to DBSC, anaffiliate of Discover Bank, on January 1, 2011, the Asserting Party provided support services during the Reporting Period to DFS for the one month ending December 31, 2010 and to DBSC for the eleven months ending November 30, 2011.The Asserting Party used the selected criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and (d)(4)(iv) (such applicable criteria, as discussed below, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”), to assess such compliance with respect support servicesprovided to each of DFS and DBSC. The transactions covered by this report include all asset-backed securities transactions involving credit card receivables conducted by Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust that wereregistered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or were not required to be registered where the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period (the“Platform”). 

BancTec does not have sole responsibility for either of the Applicable Servicing Criteria, but insteadprovides support services to DFS/DBSC and Discover Bank that are necessary to their compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Specifically, BancTec is responsible for (a) capturing data with respect to cardmember payments andassociated checks, (b) transmitting such data to DFS/DBSC and Discover Bank on a timely basis consistent with their compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria; and (c) delivering certain of such checks to a third party financialinstitution for deposit into a bank account held in the name of Discover Bank. BancTec is not responsible for (x) ensuring that deposits are posted to Discover Bank’s bank accounts, (y) following up with regard to unposted deposits,and (z) posting payments to any cardmember’s account. BancTec has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, to the extent it is responsible for such aspects of such compliance, and has concluded that the AssertingParty has complied, in all material respects, with those aspects of the Applicable Servicing Criteria for which it is responsible for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the assessmentof compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. 

 

Date: February 21, 2012
Case 3:17-cv-00667-CRB Document 16 Filed 12/22/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:17-cv-00667-CRB Document 16 Filed 12/22/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:17-cv-00667-CRB Document 16 Filed 12/22/16 Page 3 of 3
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,322-01

EX PARTE JAIME PIERO COLE

ON APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN CAUSE NO. 1250754 IN THE 230 DISTRICT COURT

TH

HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

In October 2011, a jury found applicant guilty of the offense of capital murder. The

jury answered the statutory punishment questions in such a way that the trial court set

applicant’s punishment at death. On July 24, 2013, the State filed in this Court its brief on

applicant’s direct appeal. Pursuant to Article 11.071 §§ 4(a) and (b) , applicant’s initial

1

Unless otherwise indicated all references to Articles refer to the Code of

1

Criminal Procedure.
Cole - 2

application for a writ of habeas corpus was due to be filed in the trial court on or before

December 6, 2013, assuming a motion for extension was timely filed and granted. It has

been nearly two years since the application was due in the trial court. Accordingly, we order

the trial court to resolve any remaining issues in the case within 120 days from the date of

this order. The clerk shall then immediately transmit the complete writ record to this Court.

Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 16 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.

TH

Do Not Publish
Jose NOGUERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
---

Exhibit 99.7


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. § 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of GLG Life Tech Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Luke Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Luke Zhang
Luke Zhang 
Chief Executive Officer 
Date: March 31, 2011


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CENTOCOR,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         157,295
<SECURITIES>                                   120,526
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               352,575
<PP&E>                                         169,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 725,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          154,789
<BONDS>                                        514,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           702
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   725,450
<SALES>                                         56,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,865
<CGS>                                           20,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (140,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (140,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (140,307)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.00)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 13, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 3, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 613 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1171, K2025-1171.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-02563 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P