alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 3, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-01079-CV 

ALFRED L. OWENS, Appellant 

V. 

TIAA, FSB, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-06513-E 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Breedlove 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to 

our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without 

a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by March 30, 2024. By 

postcard dated April 2, 2024, we informed appellant his brief was overdue and 

directed appellant to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure 

to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief nor otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

231079F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ALFRED L. OWENS, Appellant 

No. 05-23-01079-CV V. 

TIAA, FSB, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-06513-

E. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Pedersen, III and 

Breedlove participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered May 3, 2024
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the Form 10-K Annual Report of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: April 13, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Roger A. May             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Roger A. May                 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Manager                      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Emanuel Forty LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2701

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification

I, Tian Ling, certify that:

        1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A
(Amendment No. 1) of Iron Star Development, Inc.;

        2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this  report;

        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this  report;

        4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
small business issuer and have:

        a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

        b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

        c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

        5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

        a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

        b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006          /s/ Tian Ling
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Tian Ling, Chief Executive Officer
#### In re: HILBURN’S PAINT AND BODY SHOP, INC. Debtor. Richard Clippard, Trustee, Appellant, v. Hilburn’s Paint and Body Shop, Inc., Appellee.

No. 01-6519.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 27, 2004.

P. Matthew Sutko, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Sean M. Haynes, Ellen B. Vergos, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Memphis, TN, for Appellant.

Norman P. Hagemeyer, Memphis, TN, for Appellee.

Before: MERRITT, NELSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

The United States Trustee appeals a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) that affirms the bankruptcy court’s final order approving an administrative claim and disbursement of funds from the bankruptcy estate, including $1,250.20 in compensation to the Chapter 7 debtor’s attorneys. The appellee waived the filing of a brief in this appeal. After the Trustee had filed his brief, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in *Lamie v. United States Trustee,*538 U.S. 905, 123 S.Ct. 1480, 155 L.Ed.2d 223 (2003), to resolve a circuit split as to whether 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(1) permits compensation to Chapter 7 debtor’s attorneys who are not separately qualified under 11 U.S.C. § 327. This appeal was placed in abeyance pending the outcome of that decision. The Court has now issued its decision holding that such fees may not be paid from the bankruptcy estate. *Lamie v. United States Trustee,*540 U.S. ——, 124 S.Ct. 1023, 157 L.Ed.2d 1024 (2004). The Trus*351tee moves for summary reversal of the BAP’s decision in light of *Lamie.*

The BAP’s order of October 4, 2001, hereby is REVERSED, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings as necessary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from National
Property Investors 6 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000708870
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 6
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,492
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          80,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         34,452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,259
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,480
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,769
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (289)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.61)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form
10-K Annual Report of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                               
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 22, 2009 |  | By: |  | /S/ THOMAS R. REEG                                            
|                    |  |     |  | Thomas R. Reeg Operating
Manager (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 1

Filed Under Seal

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 122-1 Filed 02/22/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 9407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-4020]



[[Page 9407]]

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

[TA-W-30,360 Nylon Hosiery Department TA-W-30,360A Polyester Filament 
Department]


BASF Corporation, Lowland, Tennessee; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 7, 1994, applicable 
to all workers of the nylon hosiery department. The certification 
notice was published in the Federal Register on January 3, 1995 (60 FR 
148).
    The certification was amended on February 3, 1995 to include all 
the workers of the polyester filament department. This notice will soon 
be published in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the workers and with congressional support, the 
Department again reviewed the certification for workers of the subject 
firm. New findings show that some workers were laid off just prior to 
the September 19, 1993 impact date set in the certification. The 
Department in setting its impact date can go back to August 1, 1993.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification by 
deleting the September 19, 1993 impact date and setting a new impact 
date of August 1, 1993.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,360 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of BASF Corporation, Polyester Filament Department 
and the Nylon Hosiery Department, Lowland, Tennessee who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 1, 
1993 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, D.C., this 10th day of February 1995.
Victory J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 94-4020 Filed 2-16-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JUAN QUINTANILLA VASQUEZ, et 

al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cv-00755 CW 

 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC 

VICE 

(Re: Dkt. No. 242) 

On January 19, 2023, Zachary Lawrence filed an application for admission to practice pro 

hac vice in this district. Docket No. 242. Mr. Lawrence’s application states that his local cocounsel is Joshua E. Matic, whose California bar number is 259070. Civil Local Rule 11-3(a)(3) 

requires that the designated local co-counsel be a member of the bar of the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of California in good standing. Mr. Matic is not a member of the 

bar of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Accordingly, the 

Court DENIES Mr. Lawrence’s application for admission to practice pro hac vice WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE to re-filing once Mr. Lawrence can identify local co-counsel who is a member of the 

bar of this Court in good standing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

Dated: 1/19/2023 

CLAUDIA WILKEN 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:17-cv-00755-CW Document 244 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Liberty Bancorp (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Patricia Ochal., Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/  Patricia OchalName:

Patricia OchalTitle:

Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)


Date: March 30, 2012
David Edwin BURNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-279

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LEJUAN M. HALL,

Appellant,

 v. Case No. 5D23-138

LT Case No. 2018-CF-2374 A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed March 14, 2023

Appeal from Circuit Court

for Duval County,

R. Anthony Salem, Judge.

W. Charles Fletcher, of Law Office of

W. Charles Fletcher, Jacksonville,

for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and 

Miranda L. Butson, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

MAKAR, JAY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 33.4**

**Management’s Assertion on**

**Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria**

BancTec, Inc. (“BancTec” or the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing its compliance, as ofand for the one month transition period ended December 31, 2012 (the “Transition Period”) and as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 (together with the Transition Period, the “Reporting Period”), with certainservicing criteria applicable to it in connection with the Services Agreement dated as of September 30, 2008, as amended, (the “Services Agreement”) between BancTec, Inc. and DB Servicing Corporation (“DBSC”), assignee of,DFS Services LLC. The Asserting Party used the selected criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and (d)(4)(iv) (such applicable criteria, as discussed below, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”), to assess such compliance with respect tosupport services provided to DBSC. The transactions covered by this report include all asset-backed securities transactions involving credit card receivables conducted by Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust that wereregistered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or were not required to be registered where the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period (the“Platform”). 

BancTec does not have sole responsibility for either of the Applicable Servicing Criteria, but insteadprovides support services to DBSC and Discover Bank that are necessary to their compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Specifically, BancTec is responsible for (a) capturing data with respect to cardmember payments and associatedchecks, (b) transmitting such data to DBSC and Discover Bank on a timely basis consistent with their compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria; and (c) delivering certain of such checks to a third party financial institution fordeposit into a bank account held in the name of Discover Bank. BancTec is not responsible for (x) ensuring that deposits are posted to Discover Bank’s bank accounts, (y) following up with regard to unposted deposits, and(z) posting payments to any cardmember’s account. BancTec has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, to the extent it is responsible for such aspects of such compliance, and has concluded that the Asserting Partyhas complied, in all material respects, with those aspects of the Applicable Servicing Criteria for which it is responsible for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the assessmentof compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. 

 

Date: March 21, 2014
Exhibit 21.1





Subsidiaries of the Registrant





SinoHub International, Inc., a Delaware corporation





SinoHub Electronics Shanghai, Ltd., a PRC company, wholly owned by SinoHub International, Inc.





SinoHub Electronics Shenzhen, Ltd., a PRC company, wholly owned by SinoHub International, Inc.





SinoHub SCM Shenzhen, Ltd., a PRC company, wholly owned by SinoHub Electronics Shenzhen, Ltd.





SinoHub SCM Shanghai, Ltd., a PRC company, wholly owned by SinoHub Electronics Shenzhen, Ltd.





B2B Chips, Limited, a Hong Kong company, wholly owned by SinoHub Electronics Shenzhen Ltd.





SinoHub Technology (Hong Kong) Limited, a Hong Kong company, wholly owned by B2B Chips, Limited.





Topology Communication Technology (Shenzhen) Ltd., a PRC company, wholly owned by B2B Chips, Limited.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40154 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RICARDO RODRIGUEZ

- CORDERO
,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 772

- 1

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ricardo Rodriguez

Cordero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez

- Cordero h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 24, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40154 Document: 00514207650 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2017No. 17

- 40154

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40154 Document: 00514207650 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2017