alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7493

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH MASON SPRAGUE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (7:04-cr-00029-HMH-AL)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 1, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Mason Sprague, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

While it appears as though an appeal from the district

court’s denial of Sprague’s Rule 36 motion may be untimely, Sprague

has asserted that he did not receive notice of the denial of said

motion until the day before he filed his motion for written order

and motion for clarification. Even assuming, arguendo, that he

timely raised his challenge to the underlying order, given that

there is no error, clerical or otherwise, in Sprague’s judgment of

conviction, this challenge would be without merit. 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Sprague appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for written order and for clarification of record,

following the denial of Sprague’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. The

underlying basis for Sprague’s motion is that he seeks to have his

criminal judgment order amended to reflect satisfaction of the

restitution ordered by the district court, based upon the

forfeiture by the United States of a vehicle Sprague purchased

allegedly with proceeds from the bank robbery of which he was

convicted. We find no error in the district court’s denial of

Sprague’s motion. To the extent Sprague seeks to appeal the denial

of his request for clarification of the district court’s oral order

denying Sprague’s Rule 36 motion, we find no error. The docket

sheet clearly shows that the district court denied his motion for

clarification. To the extent Sprague seeks to challenge the

district court’s denial of the underlying Rule 36 motion,* we

likewise find no error. The judgment order is correct as entered.

The determination of whether Sprague’s restitution obligations have

been satisfied is a post-judgment accounting matter that does not
- 3 -

affect the integrity of the original judgment of conviction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10926]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Investment Advisory Council; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Investment Advisory Council will hold a 
public meeting from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Thursday, May 11, 1995, at the 
ANA Hotel, located at 2900 M Street, NW, Washington, DC, to discuss 
such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small 
Business Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call Ed Cleveland, U.S. Small 
Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW, Washington, DC 20416, 
(202) 205-6510.

    Dated: April 27, 1995.
Dorothy A. Overal,
Director, Office of Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 95-10926 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 11.1



                            Castle Energy Corporation
                 Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Three Months Ended December 31,
                                                                   ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               2001                                2000
                                                                   ----------------------------          --------------------------
                                                                      Basic           Diluted              Basic          Diluted
                                                                   -----------      -----------          ----------      ----------
<S>                                                                <C>              <C>                  <C>             <C>
     I.  Shares Outstanding, Net of Treasury
            Stock Purchased and Options Exercised During
            the Period:

               Stock, net                                            6,632,884        6,632,884           6,718,884       6,718,884
               Purchase of treasury stock (weighted)                                                        (38,480)        (38,480)
                                                                   -----------      -----------          ----------      ----------
                                                                     6,632,884        6,632,884           6,680,404       6,680,404


    II.  Weighted Equivalent Shares:

               Assumed options and warrants exercised                                   120,746                             219,229
                                                                   -----------      -----------          ----------      ----------

   III.  Weighted Average Shares and Equivalent Shares               6,632,884        6,753,630           6,680,404       6,899,633
                                                                   ===========      ===========          ==========      ==========

    IV.  Net Income (Loss)                                         ($      272)     ($      272)         $    1,110      $    1,110
                                                                   ===========      ===========          ==========      ==========


     V.  Net Income (Loss) Per Share                               ($      .04)     ($      .04)         $      .17      $      .16
                                                                   ===========      ===========          ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
exv4w3












Exhibit 4.3





COMPANY ORDER









     Pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture dated October 23, 1995 between Advanta Corp. (the
“Company”) and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly, The
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.)), successor trustee, the Company hereby issues this Company Order to be
effective concurrent with the effective date of the Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-136724 on Form S-3 being filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about February 9, 2009.








     The terms and conditions applicable to the following securities shall be as set forth in the
Company’s prospectus, and any applicable prospectus supplement, relating to such securities:



     RediReserve Variable Rate Certificates



     Investment Notes with Maturities of 91 Days to Ten Years



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Advanta Corp.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	



	Dated as of February 9, 2009

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Philip M. Browne
 

Philip M. Browne	 	 
	



	[Corporate Seal]

	 	 	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	



	 
	 	By:	 	/s/ Jay A. Dubow	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	Jay A. Dubow 
Secretary	 	 
	



	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Attest:	 	/s/ Liane Browne	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Liane Browne

Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pride, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 20, 2006


 /s/ Michael Schumacher
----------------------------------------------
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32246]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP84-42-015]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

December 27, 1994.
    Take notice that on December 16, 1994, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (Koch), formerly United Gas Pipe Line Company, tendered for 
filing its refund report reflecting funds remitted by Koch to LaClede 
Gas Company pursuant to settlement agreements in the above referenced 
docket.
    Koch states that the funds were remitted in September 1994. Koch 
states that the total refund amounted to $6,102,287, inclusive of 
principal and interest.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). 
All such motions or protests should be filed on or before January 4, 
1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-32246 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 86 (Thursday, May 4, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22049-22050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11054]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[C-542-401]


Determination Not To Revoke Countervailing Duty Order; Certain 
Textile Mill Products From Sri Lanka

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Import Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of determination not to revoke countervailing duty 
order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is notifying the 
public of its determination not to revoke the countervailing duty order 
on certain textile mill products from Sri Lanka.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Albright, Office of 
Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
2786.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 1, 1994, the Department published in the Federal Register 
(59 FR 9727) its intent to revoke the countervailing duty order on 
certain textile mill products from Sri Lanka (50 FR 9826; March 12, 
1985). Under 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii), the Secretary of 
[[Page 22050]] Commerce will conclude that an order is no longer of 
interest to interested parties and will revoke the order if no domestic 
interested party objects to revocation, and no interested party 
requests an administrative review by the last day of the fifth 
anniversary month.
    Within the specified time frame, we received an objection from 
domestic interested parties to our intent to revoke this countervailing 
duty order. The Department determined that these domestic interested 
parties had standing as an interested party under 19 CFR 355.2(i) with 
respect to all like products covered by this countervailing duty order. 
See Memorandum to the File from Martina Tkadlec, Case Analyst, April 
12, 1995, which is on file in the Central Records Unit (Room B-099 of 
the Main Commerce Building).
    Therefore, because the requirements of 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii) 
have not been met, we will not revoke the order.
    This determination is in accordance with 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4).

    Dated: April 8, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-11054 Filed 5-3-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We have
examined WestLake Settlement Services, LLC's compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to WestLake (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria") as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007:


1122(d)(4)(xi)
Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance payments) are
made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as indicated on the
appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided that such support has
been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar days prior to these dates, or
such other number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.;


1122(d)(4)(xii)
Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be made on behalf
of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged to the obligor,
unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or
omission;


Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with these servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.


Our
examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria.


In our
opinion, WestLake Settlement Services, LLC complied with, in all material
respects, the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007.





/s/
Virchow Krause & Company, LLP


Virchow
Krause & Company, LLP


March 3,
2008


7900
Xerxes Avenue South • Suite 2400 • Minneapolis,
MN 55431-1115 • Tel 952.835.1344 • Fax 952.835.5845 •
www.virchowkrause.com
 Virchow,
Krause &Company, LLP
 Certified  Public
Accountants & Consultants • An Independent Member of Baker Tilly
International
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,554,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,554,477
<PP&E>                                      22,395,185
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,347,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,601,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,242,488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,601,771
<SALES>                                     16,288,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,387,611
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  846,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,541,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,541,047
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 87 (Friday, May 5, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 22414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-11104]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Networking and Communications Research 
and Infrastructure (NCRI); Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Networking and Communications 
Research (#1207).
    Date and Time: May 25, 1995, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Place: Room 1175, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Mr. Douglas Gatchell, NCRI, National Science 
Foundation, Room 1175, Arlington, VA 22230 (703-306-1949).
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted for NSFNET 
Connections Program.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals.
    These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: May 1, 1995.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-11104 Filed 5-4-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 358/2018

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 358 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 614 października 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 358

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 614 października 2018

---

| Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacje |
| | INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ |
| | Parlament EuropejskiRada |
| 2018/C 358/01 | Wspólne oświadczenie Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady i Komisji w sprawie rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2018/1475 ustanawiającego ramy prawne Europejskiego Korpusu Solidarności i zmieniającego rozporządzenie (UE) nr 1288/2013, rozporządzenie (UE) nr 1293/2013 i decyzję nr 1313/2013/UE | 1 |

Spis treśći

Strona

IV   Informacje

INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

Parlament EuropejskiRada

2018/C 358/01

Wspólne oświadczenie Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady i Komisji w sprawie rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2018/1475 ustanawiającego ramy prawne Europejskiego Korpusu Solidarności i zmieniającego rozporządzenie (UE) nr 1288/2013, rozporządzenie (UE) nr 1293/2013 i decyzję nr 1313/2013/UE

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

IV Informacje

INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ

Parlament Europejski Rada

| 4.10.2018 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 358/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2018

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 358/1

---

Wspólne oświadczenie Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady i Komisji w sprawie rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2018/1475 ustanawiającego ramy prawne Europejskiego Korpusu Solidarności i zmieniającego rozporządzenie (UE) nr 1288/2013, rozporządzenie (UE) nr 1293/2013 i decyzję nr 1313/2013/UE (1)

(2018/C 358/01)

2014–2020 (WRF) oraz przesunięć środków z Unijnego Mechanizmu Ochrony Ludności i programu LIFE. Jednakże nie należy dokonywać dodatkowych przesunięć środków z programu Erasmus+ oprócz kwoty 231 800 000 EUR, o której mowa we wniosku Komisji (COM(2017) 262).

Pozostałe 20 % budżetu na realizację programu w latach 2019 i 2020 powinno pochodzić z dostępnych marginesów w ramach poddziału 1a WRF na lata 2014–2020.

Panuje powszechna zgoda co do tego, że Komisja w zrównoważony i ostrożny sposób zadba o udostępnienie niezbędnych środków w ramach zwykłej rocznej procedury budżetowej.

Oświadczenie Komisji

Komisja potwierdza, że wykorzystanie środków przeznaczonych na pomoc techniczną z inicjatywy Komisji na podstawie rozporządzenia w sprawie wspólnych przepisów (w szczególności przeniesienie środków z Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego i z Europejskiego Funduszu Rolnego na rzecz Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich) na finansowanie Europejskiego Korpusu Solidarności w 2018 r., nie zostanie wykorzystane przez Komisję jako precedens przy opracowywaniu wniosku w sprawie Europejskiego Korpusu Solidarności na okres po roku 2020 (COM(2018) 440)).

---

(1)  Dz.U. L 250 z 4.10.2018, s. 1.

---