alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10568]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-237-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

April 25, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 19, 1995, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be 
effective May 4, 1995, the effective date of Order No. 577.

First Revised Sheet No. 351
First Revised Sheet No. 352
First Revised Sheet No. 353
First Revised Sheet No. 354
First Revised Sheet No. 575
First Revised Sheet No. 585

    In Order No. 577, the Commission modified its capacity release 
regulations to permit shippers to release firm capacity for a period of 
one calendar month or less without having to comply with advance 
posting and bidding requirements. A related change provides for a 28 
(rather than 30) day hiatus during which shippers that released 
capacity at less than the maximum rate under the exemptions cannot re-
release that capacity to the same replacement shipper at less than the 
maximum tariff rate.
    Columbia states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being 
filed to revise the capacity release and assignment provisions and 
forms in the tariff to reflect changes mandated by Order No. 577. In 
addition, Columbia is shortening the duration of minimum posting 
periods for capacity release transactions.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
firm customers and affected state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street NW., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed 
on or before May 2, 1995. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of Columbia's 
filings are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10568 Filed 4-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 34.5**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC’s Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities Platform (the Platform), asdefined in management’s assertion, as of November 30, 2011, and for the period from December 1, 2010 through November 30, 2011, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(ii), and 1122 (d)(4)(iv)-(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adoptedby the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as weconsidered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to thePlatform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions andservicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of November 30, 2011, and for the period from December 1, 2010 through November 30, 2011, for the Corporate Trust Asset BackedSecurities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

February 3, 2012
Hernan Javier CASTANO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Sherry L. CASTANO, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4728

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 25, 2013

s0918

Order 

Clerk

September 25, 2013

146962 & (46)

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146962

COA: 306820

Court of Claims: 06-000182-MT

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff taxpayer’s response to 

the defendant Department of Treasury’s August 3, 2005 audit determination letter – in 

light of events and communications that preceded that response, including information 

provided to the defendant by the plaintiff and the contents of the defendant’s Audit 

Report of Findings – was a “petition . . . for refund” or “claim for refund” for purposes of 

the calculation of overpayment interest under MCL 205.30, and (2) alternatively, whether 

the plaintiff’s November 17, 2005 request for an informal conference with the defendant, 

in spite of its later withdrawal of that request, was such a petition or claim. The motion 

for peremptory reversal is DENIED.

The Taxation Section of the State Bar of Michigan is invited to file a brief amicus 

curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in 

this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 3199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1035]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for 
Hispanic Americans; Meeting

AGENCY: President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for 
Hispanic Americans.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule and agenda of a forthcoming 
meeting of the President's Advisory Commission on Educational 
Excellence for Hispanic Americans. Also, it describes the functions of 
the Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DATES AND TIMES: Monday, January 30 and Tuesday, January 31.

ADDRESSES: Embassy Row Hotel, 2015 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marsha Harper, Telephone: (202) 205-2420.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The President's Advisory Commission on 
Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans was established under 
Executive Order 12900 on February 22, 1994. The Commission is 
established to advise on Hispanic achievements of the National Goals, 
as well as other educational accomplishments. The meeting of the 
Commission is open to the public. The Agenda includes:
    January 30, 1995, Monday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Commission will continue 
work toward its goals and priorities by implementing a two day 
Strategic Planning Session.
    January 31, 1995, Tuesday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Commission will continue a 
second all day Strategic Planning Session.
    Records are kept of all Commission proceedings, and are available 
for public inspection at the White House Initiative For Hispanic 
Education at 600 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 6442, Washington, DC 
20202 from the hours of 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
Mario Moreno,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Intergovernmental and Interagency 
Affairs, Department of Education.
[FR Doc. 95-1035 Filed 1-12-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
EX PARTE RENASANT BANK f/k/a M & F Bank

1161085 (2160097)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20720-20721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10372]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Notice of Meeting of the National Advisory Council for Human 
Genome Research

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research, 
National Center for Human Genome Research, May 22 and 23, 1995, Embassy 
Suites Chevy Chase Pavilion, Chevy Chase I and II, 4300 Military Road, 
N.W., Washington, D.C.
    This meeting will be open to the public on Monday, May 22, from 
8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. to discuss administrative details or other 
issues relating to committee activities. Attendance by the public will 
be limited to space available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
meeting will be closed to the public on May 22 at 11:30 a.m. to recess 
and on May 23 from 8:30 a.m. to adjournment, for the review, discussion 
and evaluation of individual grant applications. The applications and 
the discussions could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning [[Page 20721]] individuals associated with applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Dr. Elke Jordan, Deputy Director, National Center for Human Genome 
Research, National Institutes of Health, Building 38A, Room 605, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 496-0844, will furnish the meeting 
agenda, rosters of Committee members and consultants, and substantive 
program information upon request. Individuals who plan to attend and 
need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Jane Ades, (301) 402-
2205, two weeks in advance of the meeting.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research.)

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10372 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### LUXURIOUS X, a/k/a Timothy Lloyd, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Barton VINCENT, Deputy General Counsel *of SCDC;*Joseph Counts, Associate Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution; Barney Loyd, Associate Warden; Herb Johns, Institutional Grievance Coordinator; Paul Brewton, Major; Pernell Cromer, Captain; Billy Laughter, Lieutenant; Mike Gregory, Sergeant; Wiley Baker, Classification Caseworker; Members of Tyger River Correctional Institution Lower Yard Institutional Classification Committee on August 21, 2001, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-7935.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 29, 2004.

Decided May 4, 2004.

Luxurious X, Appellant pro se. Steven Michael Pruitt, McDonald Patrick Tinsley, McDonald, Patrick, Tinsley, Baggett & Poston, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*866Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Luxurious X appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Luxurious X v. Vincent,*No. CA-01-4419-6 (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
1995 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-23-1995

USA v Zehrbach

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 93-7477

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v Zehrbach" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 21.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/21
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 ___________ 

 Nos. 93-7477 and 93-7493 

 ___________ 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 vs. 

 DARUS H. ZEHRBACH, 

 Appellant in No. 93-7477. 

 ALEX A. MERVIS, 

 Appellant in No. 93-7493. 

 ___________ 

 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 (D.C. Criminal Nos. 92-00218-01 and 02) 

 ___________ 

 

 ARGUED OCTOBER 28, 1993 

 BEFORE: ROTH, LEWIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges. 

 REARGUED IN BANC OCTOBER 17, 1994 

 BEFORE: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, 

 MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, 

 NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE and GARTH 

 Circuit Judges. 

 ___________ 

 ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION 

 __________ 
 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Slip Opinion filed in 

this case on January 23, 1995, be amended as follows: 

 The dissent by Judge Lewis is amended to show that 

Judges Mansmann, Nygaard and McKee join in that dissent. 

BY THE COURT 

Timothy K. Lewis /s/

 Circuit Judge 

Dated: January 23, 1995
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 21 52

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca,
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e ,

v.
Eric Sin gl et on , ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - Sp rin gf ie ld

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Jan ua ry

27 , 20 16 Fil ed : J an ua ry

29 , 20 16 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BOW MAN, an d C OLLOTO N, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Fed eral pr is on er Eric Si ng le to n ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s or de r, en te red aft er 1

a he ari ng , co m

m it ti ng Si ng le to n fo r m en ta l he al th care or tre at m en t un de r 18 U.S.C. § 42 45

. Fo ll owi ng care fu l rev ie w of th e reco rd , whi ch in cl ud ed a tre at in g ps y ch ol og is t’s rep or t co nt ai ni ng th e op in io n th at Si ng le to n m et th e cri te ria fo r
co m m it m en t, we co nc lu de th e di st ric t co ur t’s fin di ng th at Si ng le to n was th en in ne ed of ho sp it al iz at io n fo r care or t reat m en t is supp or te d by a pr ep on de ran ce of th e
ev id en ce, and is no t clea rly erro ne ou s. Se e 18 U.S.C. § 42 45 (d ) ( bu rd en of pr oo f); Uni te d S ta te s v. Bea n , 37 3 F.3d 87 7, 87 9 (8t h Cir. 20 04 ) (s ta nd ardof r ev ie w). The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed , and co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is gra nt ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le M. Dou gl as Harp oo l , U n i t ed St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco mm e n d a t i on s of th e Hon or ab le Dav id P. Ru sh , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri.
-2

-
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of  Great
Spirits, Inc.(the Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended herein
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James
Hyde, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated:
February 12, 2008




By:
              /s/ James
      HydeJames
      Hyde
                Chief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vision Industries Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2011. The undersigned certifies that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of December 31, 2011. This Certification is executed as of April 16, 2012. VISION INDUSTRIES CORP. By:/s/ MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
President, Secretary, Treasurer,  and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  By:/s/ DAVID MORENODavid Moreno
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  CERTIFICATION

  Structured Asset Securities Corporation II
  TIAA Seasoned Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C4
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C4

  We, Kenneth Cohen and Paul A. Hughson, certify that:

  1. We have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of TIAA Seasoned Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C4 (the
    "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on our knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on our knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on our knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, we have reasonably relied on
    information provided to us by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Centerline Servicing Inc. as Special Servicer, First American
    Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. as servicing function participant,
    Global Realty Outsourcing, Inc. as servicing function participant,
    Wachovia Bank, National Association as Master Servicer and Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


   /s/ Kenneth Cohen
   By: Kenneth Cohen
   Title:  Managing Director
   (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)


   /s/ Paul A. Hughson
   By: Paul A. Hughson
   Title:  Managing Director
   (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)