alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the Form 10-K Annual Report of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Timothy T. Janszen       
|                     |  |     |  | Timothy T. Janszen           
|                     |  |     |  | Operating Manager            
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 587 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 587

   Honoring the memory of Jereima ``Jeri'' Bustamante on the fourth 
                      anniversary of her passing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2022

    Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mr. Rubio) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Honoring the memory of Jereima ``Jeri'' Bustamante on the fourth 
                      anniversary of her passing.

Whereas Jereima ``Jeri'' Bustamante (referred to in this preamble as ``Jeri 
        Bustamante'') lived the American Dream;
Whereas, after moving from Panama to the United States with her family, Jeri 
        Bustamante--

    (1) attended Miami Beach Senior High School; and

    (2) earned a Bachelor's Degree in Communication and Media Sciences and 
a Master's Degree in Public Administration from Florida International 
University;

Whereas Jeri Bustamante had a tireless work ethic and a passion for 
        communication and paid for her education by working while enrolled in 
        school;
Whereas that tireless work ethic propelled Jeri Bustamante to professional 
        success, beginning with an internship at a Miami television station and 
        culminating in a period of service as press secretary to Governor Rick 
        Scott;
Whereas the enthusiasm, compassion, tenacity, and vibrant energy of Jeri 
        Bustamante are greatly missed by her family, friends, and coworkers;
Whereas the spirit of Jeri Bustamante lives on through the Jereima Bustamante 
        Memorial Scholarship, which aims to help graduates of Miami Beach Senior 
        High School achieve their goals and pursue the American Dream through a 
        college education; and
Whereas April 8, 2022, marks 4 years since the life of Jeri Bustamante was 
        tragically cut short in a fatal boating accident: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the life and memory of Jereima ``Jeri'' 
        Bustamante (referred to in this resolution as ``Jeri 
        Bustamante'');
            (2) offers heartfelt condolences to the family, loved ones, 
        and friends of Jeri Bustamante;
            (3) recognizes that living the American Dream remains 
        possible for any individual who, following the example of Jeri 
        Bustamante, works hard to pursue and achieve a goal; and
            (4) encourages the recipients of the Jereima Bustamante 
        Memorial Scholarship to carry on the legacy of Jeri Bustamante.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

CR 05-0294 JL; STIP TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE 1

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

JOSH COHEN

Assistant Federal Public Defender

19th Floor Federal Building

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7700

Counsel for Defendant MEDRANO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ELIAS MEDRANO,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-05-0294 JL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE

Defendant Elias Medrano appeared before this Court on October 10, 2005 and was

released on the condition that he enter a residential dual-diagnosis treatment program at the New

Bridge Foundation in Berkeley, California. Mr. Medrano did in fact enter the program the

following week and continues to undergo treatment at this time. He is receiving counseling as

well as medication in order to treat his condition. His therapist is pleased with Mr. Medrano’s

progress to date.

Mr. Medrano, who is 18 years old, is charged with a misdemeanor “joyriding” offense. 

The parties anticipate that drug treatment will be a significant component of any negotiated

disposition in the case.

The parties are scheduled to appear for a status conference tomorrow. In light of Mr.

Case 3:05-cr-00294-JL Document 18 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

CR 05-0294 JL; STIP TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE 2

Medrano’s continued residence at New Bridge, the parties agree and stipulate that the status

conference should be continued until December 15, 2005 at 11:00 AM.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: ______/S/______________________

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

JOSH COHEN

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Dated: ______/S/______________________

KEVIN V. RYAN

United States Attorney

DEREK OWENS

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a

"conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

ORDER

Accordingly, and for good cause shown, the status conference presently scheduled for

November 10, 2005 is hereby continued to December 15, 2005 at 11:00 AM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________________

JAMES LARSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

November 10, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson

Case 3:05-cr-00294-JL Document 18 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6583

DARRELL J. DEBREW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRANDON BROOKS; P. COLLINS; LT. DODSON; C. EICHENLAUB; MRS. 

FAUCETT; GLENN O. FORD; CANDICE GREGORY; TRACY JOHNS; 

CAMILLE JOHNSON; HARLEY LAPPIN; LT. RODENBAUGH; HARRELL 

WATTS; K. M. WHITE; JOHN DOE, Mail Room Employee; HANK 

PAULSON; JOHN DOE, Treasury Department Employee,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,

Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03198-D)

Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell James DeBrew, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darrell James DeBrew appeals the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens 

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 

U.S. 388 (1971), and denying his subsequent motion for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially∗ for the 

reasons stated by the district court. DeBrew v. Brooks, No. 

5:10-ct-03198-D (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2011 & Jan. 24, 2012). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 ∗ Although we decline to find that DeBrew’s challenges to 

his disciplinary convictions are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 

U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994), we have reviewed the merits of DeBrew’s 

claims and agree that he fails to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted.
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 10 PageID 2
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 3 of 10 PageID 3
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 4 of 10 PageID 4
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 5 of 10 PageID 5
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 6 of 10 PageID 6
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 7 of 10 PageID 7
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 8 of 10 PageID 8
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 9 of 10 PageID 9
Case 3:06-cv-00065-M Document 1 Filed 01/11/06 Page 10 of 10 PageID 10
Robert HUNT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2620

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AAA Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  March 14, 2008


/s/ Earl W. Abbott
---------------------------------------
Dr. Earl W. Abbott, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 3:17-mj-70143-MRGD Document 7 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:17-mj-70143-MRGD Document 7 Filed 02/17/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:17-mj-70143-MRGD Document 7 Filed 02/17/17 Page 3 of 3
Executive Order 14200

# Amendment to Duties Addressing the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People's Republic of China

                    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601*et seq.*), section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby determine and order:                

**Section 1**                    .                     *Amendment.*                     Regarding the Executive Order of February 1, 2025 (Imposing Duties to Address the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People's Republic of China), the following shall replace subsection (g) of section 2:                

                    “(g) Duty-free                     *de minimis*                     treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321 is available for otherwise eligible covered articles described in subsection (a) of this section, but shall cease to be available for such articles upon notification by the Secretary of Commerce to the President that adequate systems are in place to fully and expediently process and collect tariff revenue applicable pursuant to subsection (a) of this section for covered articles otherwise eligible for                     *de minimis*                     treatment.”                

**Sec. 2**                    .                     *General Provisions.*                     (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2025-02512

Billing code 3395-F4-P
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 00-4473



# 
J ERRY R OGER M C M ILLAN ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge.

(CR-88-179-P) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 27, 2000 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Mark P. Foster, Jr., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Brian L.Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM:Jerry Roger McMillan appeals the district court’s judgment imposing a twenty-four month sentence for his violation of the terms of hissupervised release. McMillan suggests that the district court erroneously concluded that it lacked the discretion to impose a sentence concurrent with McMillan’s pending term of imprisonment for his state conviction. See USSG § 7B1.3(f), p.s. Although § 7B1.3(f) dictates that any term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release be consecutive to any sentence the defendant is serving, the Chapter 7 policy statements are not binding on the district court. See United States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 641-42 (4th Cir.1995). As a result, contrary to the district court’s statements at sentencing, the court was not bound to impose a consecutive sentence, but could have in its discretion ordered a concurrent sentence under the appropriate circumstances. See Koon v. United States , 518 U.S. 81, 92-95 (1996). The district court’s failure to recognize its own power to depart downward renders the error reviewable on appeal. See United States v. Bayerle , 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we vacate McMillan’s sentence only and remand forreconsideration of the sentence in light of the district court’s discretion and the factors governing the possibility of a downward departure. See Koon , 518 U.S. at 95. The district court’s judgment is affirmed in all other respects. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART 2 U NITED S TATES v. M C M ILLAN
EX-35.1
Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2007-3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the
"Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer's
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
22nd day of February 2008.


By: /s/ Jeanne M. Bader
Name: Jeanne M. Bader
Title: Senior Vice President
Director of Loan Administration
Exhibit 31.1  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, David Oman, certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elite Artz, Inc.;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ David Oman Date: August 8, 2006           ___________________________________________ David Oman, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ayden R. Lee, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ayden R. Lee, Jr.

Ayden R. Lee, Jr.

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer



March 15, 2007



This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
Stipulation To Dismissal Of Complaint With Prejudice 

17-CV-153-MEJ 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

CHAD A. READLER 

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

Civil Division 

ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR. 

Director 

BRIAN A. MIZOGUCHI 

Assistant Director 

ANDREW W. LAMB 

Trial Attorney 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Civil Division 

Commercial Litigation Branch 

P.O. Box 480, Ben Franklin Station 

Washington, DC 20044 

Telephone: (202) 616-0465 

Facsimile: (202) 307-0972 

Andrew.Lamb@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

MAUREEN FRENCH 

1448 Purdue Street 

San Leandro, CA 94579 

Telephone: (224) 659-3096 

peec2all@gmail.com 

Plaintiff (pro se) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MAUREEN FRENCH, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

ERIC FANNING, Secretary of the Army, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

17-CV-153-MEJ

STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES 

TO DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT 

WITH PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), plaintiff Maureen French and defendant Eric 

Fanning, Secretary of the Army, hereby voluntarily stipulate and agree to the dismissal, with 

prejudice, of the complaint in the above-captioned action. 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Maria-Elena James

GRANTED. 

Case is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

Dated: 8/21/2017

Stipulation To Dismissal Of Complaint With Prejudice 

17-CV-153-MEJ 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that, on August 21, 2017, I caused a copy of the foregoing stipulation to 

be deposited in the U.S. mail (first-class, postage prepaid), addressed to: Maureen French, 1448 

Purdue Street, San Leandro, CA 94579. 

/s/ Andrew W. Lamb
Exhibit 6

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-7 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
Ulyssess SMITH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Tara L. SMITH, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1157

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Gregory William GOETZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Crystal Broussard GOETZ, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.