alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 5th Floor

San Jose, California 95110

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JESSILYN MANIMBAO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 3:17-CV-000394-JST

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FIRST 

ELECTRONIC BANK; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Jessilyn Manimbao and First 

Electronic Bank (“FEB”), that FEB be dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, section 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and that each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

//

//

//
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

DATED: May 1, 2017 SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jessilyn Manimbao

DATED: May 1, 2017 BALLARD SPAHR LLP

By: /s/ Taylor Steinbacher

Taylor Steinbacher

Attorneys for Defendant

First Electronic Bank 

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Taylor Steinbacher has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, FEB, is dismissed with prejudice and that each 

party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

JON S. TIGAR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

May 1, 2017
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ARLENE CAMPBELL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

992 PERALTA LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cv-00189-YGR 

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR 

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

Re: Dkt. No. 5 

On January 25, 2017, the Court granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismissed her complaint for failure to state any claims upon which relief could be 

granted. (Dkt. No. 4.) In an abundance of caution, the Court gave plaintiff leave to file an 

amended complaint no later than February 24, 2017. (Id.) Plaintiff filed an amended complaint 

on that date. 

The in forma pauperis statute provides that a court shall dismiss any action proceeding in 

forma pauperis “at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal . . . fails to state a 

claim on which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 

1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 2000) (“It is also clear that section 1915(e) not only permits but requires a 

district court to dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that fails to state a claim.”). The Court 

finds that the complaint is plagued with the same deficiencies that warranted dismissal in the first 

instance. Plaintiff appears to claim that federal jurisdiction exists under the Endangered Species 

Act and the American Disabilities Act, yet alleges no facts to support claims under the same or 

under any viable cause of action. Thus, the Court finds that plaintiff has not alleged any 

cognizable claims, nor has she shown that this Court would properly have subject matter 

jurisdiction, in any event. 

Case 4:17-cv-00189-YGR Document 6 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Accordingly, and because the Court finds that amendment here would be futile, the Court 

DISMISSES the instant action without leave to amend. 

This Order terminates the action, and the Clerk shall close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 9, 2017 

______________________________________ 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:17-cv-00189-YGR Document 6 Filed 03/09/17 Page 2 of 2
Angela Spivey February 14, 2017.
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date:  March 16, 2010
    /s/ S.P. Johnson IVS.P. Johnson IVPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Carlos GUTIERREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4152

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# L_2018238EN.01009101.xml

| 21.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 238/91 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 238/91

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2018/1274

of 18 September 2018

appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Denmark, of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Danish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the mandate of Ms Dorthe ANDERSEN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the mandate of Ms Dorthe ANDERSEN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Nils TRAMPE, Director Social Affairs in the Confederation of Danish Employers (DA), is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2018.

For the Council

The President

G. BLÜMEL

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

2

---
Unassociated Document


     

     


     

    
      	 	
              January
      16, 2009

            


    

    


    


    AMENDMENT
TO JAY MARKELL’S SEPARATION AGREEMENT

    


    This
amendment modifies paragraph 1 of Workstream’s Separation Agreement executed on
December 23, 2008 with Jay Markell, Chief Financial Officer for Workstream and
extends Jay Markell’s last day worked to the date of the filing of the 10Q for
FY09 Q2.  Payment for severance will begin on January 30th,
2009.

    


    With
the exception of the paragraph modification listed in this amendment, the
remainder of the agreement remains unchanged and enforceable.

    


    I
agree to the terms of this amendment.

     

    
      
        
          	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/
      Jay Markell  

                	 	 	
                   

                	 
	
                  Jay
      Markell  

                	Date	 	 	 
	
                   

                	 	 	
                   

                	 


        

      

    

     

    
      
        
          
            	 	 	 	 	 
	
                    /s/
      Stephen J. Purello

                  	 	 	 	 
	
                          
                      Stephen
      J. Purello, President/CEO
STATE of Louisiana v. John Edward MARSHALL

No. 2019-KH-0392

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

CRICHTON, J., recused.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stinger
Systems, Inc., for the period ended March 31, 2007;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2007
    By:
    /s/ David J. MeadorDavid J. MeadorChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated March 27, 2014, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  Dated:  March 17, 2015   /s/   Samuel PollockSamuel   PollockCEO,   Brookfield Infrastructure Group L.P.
# C_2018031EN.01000301.xml

| 27.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 23 January 2018

on the appointment of the member of the European Statistical Advisory Committee representing the Council

(2018/C 31/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Decision No 234/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Advisory Committee and repealing Council Decision 91/116/EEC (1),

1

Having regard to the recommendation of the Economic and Financial Committee of 30 November 2017,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 April 2013 the Council appointed Mr Maurizio VICHI as the representative of the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee (2). His current term expires on 31 March 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 April 2013 the Council appointed Mr Maurizio VICHI as the representative of the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee (2). His current term expires on 31 March 2018.

2

| (2) | Mr Maurizio VICHI is eligible to serve a second 5-year term as the member representing the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Maurizio VICHI is eligible to serve a second 5-year term as the member representing the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Maurizio VICHI is hereby reappointed for a second 5-year term as member representing the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 April 2018.

Done at Brussels, 23 January 2018.

For the Council

The President

V. GORANOV

---

(1)  OJ L 73, 15.3.2008, p. 13.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 22 April 2013 on the appointment of the member of the European Statistical Advisory Committee representing the Council (OJ C 127, 4.5.2013, p. 1).

2

---
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 6th Floor

San Jose, CA 95110

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCICO DIVISION

BETTY GRINDER,

Plaintiff,

v.

DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES; et. 

al.,

 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:17-CV-00343-WHA

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH 

DEFENDANT DISCOVER FINANCIAL 

SERVICES

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT plaintiff Betty Grinder and defendant Discover 

Financial Services by and through their respective counsel of record, have reached a settlement 

in principle of the above captioned case and are in the process of documenting said settlement. 

The parties believe the settlement will be finalized within 30 days. 

Sagaria Law, P.C.

Dated: April 14, 2017 /s/ Elliot Gale 

Elliot Gale

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 3:17-cv-00343-WHA Document 31 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James L. EWING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-41396.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 6, 2004.

*241Paul E. Ñaman, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Bruce A. Hoffer, Beaumont, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

James L. Ewing appeals his sentence, following his guilty-plea conviction of possession of marijuana by a federal inmate, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1791(a)(2). Ewing contends the district court clearly erred by denying a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1.

Although Ewing timely pleaded guilty and admitted to the Probation Office his role in the offense, the Probation Office reported that Ewing subsequently was again involved in possessing marijuana and other unauthorized items while he was an inmate. The district court upheld the Probation Office’s withdrawal of an earlier recommendation that Ewing be granted an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction, because he had not “voluntarily terminat[ed] or withdraw[n] from criminal conduct”. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment (n.l(b)).

The district court’s finding that Ewing failed to show that he had accepted responsibility was not “without foundation”, *see United States v. Brace,*145 F.3d 247, 264 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. *denied*525 U.S. 973, 119 S.Ct. 426, 142 L.Ed.2d 347 (1998), as it was supported by unrebutted information in Ewing’s Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”). *See United States v. Cothran,*302 F.3d 279, 286 (5th Cir.2002) (under U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3, p.s., PSR information bears “ ‘sufficient indicia of reliability’ ” in making factual determinations under the Sentencing Guidelines, “ ‘especially when there is no evidence in rebuttal’ ” (citation omitted)).

*AFFIRMED*

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Randal Thomas ROSADO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1467

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 24 (Thursday, February 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9100-9101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02298]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20701 and #20702; North Carolina Disaster Number 
NC-20007]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of North Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 6.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4827-DR), dated 
September 28, 2024.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Helene.
    Incident Period: September 25, 2024, through December 28, 2024.

DATES: Issued on February 3, 2025.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: March 8, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 30, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated September 28, 2024, 
is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster to March 8, 2025.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

[[Page 9101]]

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2025-02298 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```