alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<CASH>                                           10946
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2283
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 10650
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     113824
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         141007
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  289660
<DEPOSITS>                                      253484
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2316
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       26360
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  289660
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   3159
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1614
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   186
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  5007
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  48
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1855
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3152
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  24
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1529
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1529
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.76
<LOANS-NON>                                       1703
<LOANS-PAST>                                       391
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   706
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1477
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3083
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      106
<RECOVERIES>                                       119
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3171
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2188
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            983 
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL**

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LP**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, KenMaples, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President-Finance and Secretary of HilandPartners GP, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Partners, LP (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.            The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 9, 2007 |   | /s/ Ken Maples                                  |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Ken Maples                                      |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President-Finance |
|                   |   | and Secretary                                   |

 

----
John A. EFORD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1353

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Ketel NICOLAS, DOC #Y64236, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1109

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 12, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1

CR 17-00040 RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)

Acting United States Attorney

BARBARA J. VALLIERE (DCBN 439353)

Chief, Criminal Division

KAREN KREUZKAMP (CABN 246151)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-7014

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Email: Karen.Kreuzkamp@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARC CHRISTOPHER BROCKHAUS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR 17-00040 RS

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE; 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters this order 

vacating the currently scheduled status for sentencing date on January 31, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. and re-setting 

the matter for March 27, 2018 at 2:30 p.m., at which time the parties believe that they will be in a position 

to set a sentencing date. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. The defendant is currently out of custody. 

2. This matter is currently set for a status on sentencing date on January 31, 2018.

3. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court:

(1) sets a status for sentencing date on March 27, 2018, at 2:30 p.m.; and

(2) vacates the currently-scheduled status for sentencing date of January 31, 2018.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 2

CR 17-00040 RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: January 25, 2018 ALEX G. TSE

Acting United States Attorney

/s/

KAREN KREUZKAMP

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: January 25, 2018

/s/

JONATHAN MCDOUGALL

Counsel for the Defendant

Based upon the above Stipulation, and for good cause appearing, THE COURT ORDERS THAT 

the status hearing that had been set for January 31, 2018 at 2:30 p.m., be re-set to March 27, 2018 at 

2:30 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

30

1/26/18
Jose M. ROBAYO, Appellant, v. Stefanie DECATERINO, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1701

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019

Law Offices of Granoff & Kessler, and Roy E. Granoff ; Jay M. Levy, for appellant.

No Appearance for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Devin Pierre-Antione DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-1382

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
William NOCKENGOST, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3548

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX-34.2
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800
Dallas TX 75201-2997
Telephone (214) 999 1400
Facsimile (214) 754 7991



Report of independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Report on Assessment of Compliance, that First American Commercial Real Estate
Services, Inc. (the "Company" and an indirect subsidiary of The First American
Corporation) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for
commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as
the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2007
and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iii),
1122(d)(2)(i)-(iv), 112(d)(3)(i)-(iv),1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and
1122(d)(4)(xiv)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the
servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management's
assertion identifies the individual securities defined by management as
constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing
activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company
processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited
to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company
during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or
subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.
We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing
customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 12, 2008
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN)

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2592

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO í139)

On December 12, 2014, the Panel transferred 20 civil action(s) to the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 65 F.Supp.3d 1402 (J.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, 551 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Eldon E. Fallon.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana and assigned to

Judge Fallon.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Eastern District of Louisiana for the reasons stated in the order of December 12, 2014, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Eldon E. Fallon.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall

be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7íday period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

g

Mar 08, 2017

Mar 10 2017

Case 5:17-cv-00539-EJD Document 26 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 2
IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN)

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2592

SCHEDULE CTOí139 í TAGíALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 5 17í00539 Binion v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al

NORTH CAROLINA MIDDLE

NCM 1 17í00164 LEWIS et al v. BAYER AG et al

g

DW-	


DW-	


Case 5:17-cv-00539-EJD Document 26 Filed 03/10/17 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60423

Summary Calendar

 

MARWAN JWEIED ABADI, also known as Mark Abadi

Petitioner

v

JOHN ASHCROFT, US ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

A77 449 583

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marwan Jweied Abadi has filed a petition for review of a

final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming

the denial of Abadi’s motion to reopen his removal proceeding. 

Abadi was ordered removed in absentia on June 1, 1999, when he

failed to appear for his removal hearing. 

Abadi argues that the BIA abused its discretion in light of

evidence that he failed to receive notice of the removal hearing. 
No. 02-60423

-2-

He also argues that the BIA’s decision was an abuse of discretion

because the lack of notice violated his due process rights. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the

parties and have determined, in view of the substantial evidence

that Abadi provided the address to which notice of his removal

hearing was mailed, that the BIA did not abuse its discretion

in denying the motion to reopen. See Lopez-Gomez v. Ashcroft,

263 F.3d 442, 444 (5th Cir. 2001); Lara v. Trominski, 216 F.3d

487, 496 (5th Cir. 2000). Likewise, because the mailing of

notice to the last address provided by Abadi does not violate

due process, see United States v. Estrada-Trochez, 66 F.3d 733,

735-36 (5th Cir. 1995), Abadi has not shown an abuse of

discretion. Accordingly, Abadi’s petition for review is DENIED.

 PETITION DENIED.
BOBBY SIMMONS

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

NO.

§ IN THE COURT OF

§

§ CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

§ OF TEXAS

t|«.|is

PRO SE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE

AN ORIGINAL COPY ONLY OF THE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW the Appellant in the above-styled and numbered

cause and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to grant

leave to file an original copy only of the Petition for Dis

cretionary Review and in support therof would show to the Court

the following:

1. The style and appeal number in the Dallas Court of Appeals

is: BOBBY SIMMONS V. THE STATE OF TEXAS; Appeal No.05-14-00241-

CR, 05-14-00240-CR.

2. The Appellant moves that/ pursuant to Rule 2, Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court suspend Rule 9.3(b)/

T.R.A.P., that requires the filing of eleven(ll) copies of the

Petition for Discretionary Review with the Court.

3. The facts relied upon to show good cause for this re

quest are as follows: The Appellant is indigent and incarcerated

and does not have access to a photo copier. The Appellant is

presently not represented by counsel and intends to file a

Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review.

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JAN 22 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JAN 20 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
I|l*|l5

WHEREFORE; PREMISES CONSIDERED/ the Appellant respectfully

requests that this Honorable Court grant leave to file an or

iginal copy only of the Petition for Discretionary Review with

the Court.

Respectfully submitted,

Bobby SiJnmons#1941546

Telford Unit

3899 State Hwy 98

New Boston/ Texas 75570

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The Appellant hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing

Motion has been mailed to the Office of the Criminal District

Attorney for Dallas County, Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133

N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-19, Dallas, Texas 75207-4399, on this

j^ day of January, 2015.

Bobby Salmons
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6844
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MIKUEL TYRONE GASKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-283-H, CA-95-3930-H) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 20, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mikuel Tyrone Gaskins, Appellant Pro Se. John Vincent Geise, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gaskins , Nos. CR-90-283-H, CA-95-3930-H (D. Md. Apr. 30, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We deny the motion for oral argument and dispense with argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for bail is denied.

AFFIRMED
[Cite as In re Harter, 137 Ohio St.3d 1260, 2013-Ohio-5486.] 

IN RE HARTER. 

[Cite as In re Harter, 137 Ohio St.3d 1260, 2013-Ohio-5486.] 

(No. 2013-1907—Submitted December 13, 2013—Decided December 17, 2013.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} On December 9, 2013, this court suspended respondent, Brian 

Wade Harter, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On 

December 12, 2013, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline 

submitted a notice pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(c) notifying this court that 

respondent no longer was in default of the child-support order previously 

submitted to the court. 

{¶ 2} On consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that pursuant to 

Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Brian Wade Harter, Attorney Registration 

No. 0055500, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, be reinstated to the 

practice of law. 

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), 

reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary 

proceedings against respondent. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 

as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 

publication. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________
Jose M. AGUIRRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3477

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the use of our report dated March 15, 2009, except as to the fourth
paragraph above and Note 8 which are as of August 14, 2009, relating to the
restatement of the consolidated financial statements of United States Commodity
Funds LLC and Subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of
United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP.





/s/ SPICER JEFFRIES
LLP





Greenwood
Village, Colorado


August
17, 2009
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Brenda G. Gujral, president of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  May 15, 2008By:/s/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Nancy Jo GRANT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Charlotte ALLEN individually, and as Trustee of the Charlotte L. Allen Trust Deed October 20, 2005, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1695

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# L_2018157EN.01002701.xml

| 20.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 157/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/27

---

Corrigendum to Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2018/726 of 2 May 2018 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (EUCAP Sahel Niger/1/2018)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 122 of 17 May 2018
  )

On page 33, Article 2:

for:

‘This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption’,

read:

‘This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 May 2018.’.

---