alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018310DE.01004401.xml

| 6.12.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 310/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 310/44

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses (EU, Euratom) 2018/994 des Rates vom 13. Juli 2018 zur Änderung des dem Beschluss 76/787/EGKS, EWG, Euratom des Rates vom 20. September 1976 beigefügten Akts zur Einführung allgemeiner unmittelbarer Wahlen der Mitglieder des Europäischen Parlaments

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 178 vom 16. Juli 2018
  )

Seite 2, Artikel 1 Nummer 3 zu Artikel 3a:

Anstatt:

„Ist in innerstaatlichen Vorschriften eine Frist für die Einreichung von Bewerbungen für die Wahl zum Europäischen Parlament festgelegt, muss diese Frist mindestens drei Wochen vor dem vom betreffenden Mitgliedstaat gemäß Artikel 10 Absatz 1 festgelegten Termin für die Abhaltung der Wahl zum Europäischen Parlament betragen.“

muss es heißen:

„Ist in innerstaatlichen Vorschriften eine Frist für die Einreichung von Bewerbungen für die Wahl zum Europäischen Parlament festgelegt, muss diese Frist mindestens drei Wochen vor dem vom betreffenden Mitgliedstaat gemäß Artikel 10 Absatz 1 festgelegten Termin für die Abhaltung der Wahl zum Europäischen Parlament enden.“

---
# C_2018376EN.01000901.xml

| 18.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/9

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 15 October 2018

appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Portugal

(2018/C 376/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (1), and in particular Articles 23 and 24 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 28 September 2018 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers (the ‘Committee’) for the period from 25 September 2018 to 24 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 28 September 2018 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers (the ‘Committee’) for the period from 25 September 2018 to 24 September 2020.

| (2) | The government of Portugal has submitted nominations for several posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The government of Portugal has submitted nominations for several posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period ending on 24 September 2020:

I.   GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Portugal | Ms Isabel VILELAS
  Ms Helena BENTES | Ms Helena Cristina BARBOSA DOS SANTOS |

Country

Members

Alternates

Portugal

Ms Isabel VILELAS

Ms Helena BENTES

Ms Helena Cristina BARBOSA DOS SANTOS

Article 2

The members and alternate members not yet nominated will be appointed by the Council at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 15 October 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. KÖSTINGER

---

(1)  OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 28 September 2018 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers (OJ C 366, 10.10.2018, p. 3).

2

---
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Nicolas V. Chater, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-S Security Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 14, 2009



/s/ Nicolas V. ChaterNicolas V. ChaterChief Financial Officer
Opinion i ssued August 2 , 201 2

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

NO . 01
- 12
- 0 0 2 96
- CR

____________ OSCAR PEREZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . 13 02386

MEMORANDUM OPINION A grand jury returned a true bill of indictment against appellant, Oscar Perez, for the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault. 1 Pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, appellant pleaded guilty to the lesser

- included offense of indecency

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.021 ( a ) (1)(B)(iii), (a)(2)(B) (West Supp. 201 1 ).2

with a child by contact. 2 The trial court found appellant gui lty and, i n accordance with the terms of a ppellant’s plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant has filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea

- bargain case

— that is, a case in which a defendant ’ s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant

— a defendant may appeal onl y t hose matters that were raised by written motion and ruled on before
trial or after getting the trial court ’ s permission to appeal. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN . art. 44.02 (West 2006); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has
not been m ade part of the record. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2 (d). Here, the trial court’ s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id

. T he trial court ’s certification states t hat this is a plea

- bargain case and that the appellant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’ s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no rig ht of appeal , we must dismiss

2 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 21.11 ( a ) (1) (West 201 1 ).3

this appeal

. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardl ess of the basis for the appeal.”)

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
P ER CURI A M Panel consists of Justice s Bland, Massengale, a nd Brown

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey Markin, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Jeffrey MarkinJeffrey
      MarkinPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer


May 14,
2010





This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENNIS MACKEY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00156-VC (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, a state inmate, has filed a pro se civil action under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 against Dennis Mackey, the medical examiner for Washoe County, Nevada, and 

Jonathan Goodfellow, Assistant District Attorney for Alameda County. Bonilla has been 

disqualified from proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) unless he is “under 

imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he filed his complaint. 28 U.S.C. 

1915(g); In re Steven Bonilla, No. C 11-3180 CW (PR); Bonilla v. Dawson, No. C 13-0951 CW 

(PR). 

The allegations in this complaint do not show that Bonilla was in imminent danger at the 

time of filing. Therefore, he may not proceed in forma pauperis. Moreover, even if the IFP 

application were granted, his lawsuit would be barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 

486-87 (1994). Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice.

The Clerk shall enter a separate judgment and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

January 18, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00156-VC Document 3 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 2
2

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00156-VC Document 3 Filed 01/18/17 Page 2 of 2
# L_2018038EN.01004102.xml

| 10.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 38/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 38/41

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1570 of 15 September 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367 imposing definitive countervailing and anti-dumping duties on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China and repealing Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU confirming the acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China for the period of application of definitive measures

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 238 of 16 September 2017
  )

On page 37, in the Annex:

for:

| Name of the company | TARIC additional code |
| --- | --- |
| ‘Zheijiang Era Solar Co. Ltd | B818 ’ |

Name of the company

TARIC additional code

‘Zheijiang Era Solar Co. Ltd

B818 ’

read:

| Name of the company | TARIC additional code |
| --- | --- |
| ‘Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd | B818 ’ |

Name of the company

TARIC additional code

‘Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd

B818 ’

---
Exhibit
23.1




Consent
from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-149888 on Form S-8 of our reports dated May 19, 2009, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd., its subsidiaries, its variable
interest entity (the "VIE") and the VIE's subsidiaries (collectively, the
“Group”) and the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial
reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Digital
TV Holding Co., Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008.




/s/Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA
Ltd.


Beijing,
the People’s Republic of China


May19, 2009
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Medical Design Studios, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Justin
N. Craig, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date: March 30, 2009


/s/ Justin N. CraigJustin
      N. CraigPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Tagalder Global Investment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Hugh McClung, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Hugh McClungHugh McClung, Chief Executive Officer April 20, 2007
Melody Gaskin MOBLEY, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-174

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### FOR PUBLICATION 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

# ⎫ V ANGUARD 

### O UTDOOR 

### , LLC, a California limited liability No. 10-56635 company, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:08-cv-06035- 

# ⎬ v. ABC-JWJ C ITY OF 

### L OS 

### A NGELES 

### , a California ORDER municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. 

# ⎭
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Audrey B. Collins, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 2, 2011—Pasadena, California Filed June 3, 2011 Before: John T. Noonan and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge.*

COUNSEL Benjamin P. Pugh (argued) and James S. Azadian, EnterpriseCounsel Group ALC, Irvine, California, for the plaintiffappellant. *The Honorable Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, sitting by designation. 7309

### Carmen A. Trutanich, Kenneth T. Fong (argued), Michael J. Bostrom, and Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Los Angeles CityAttorney’s Office, Los Angeles, California, for the defendantappellee.

ORDER We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its September 27, 2010 Amended Order Re: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint; Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, attached as Appendix A. AFFIRMED. 7310 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES

### APPENDIX A 7311 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7312 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7313 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7314 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7315 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7316 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7317 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7318 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7319 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7320 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7321 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7322 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7323 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7324 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7325 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7326 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7327 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7328 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7329 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7330 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7331 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7332 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7333 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7334 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES7335 V ANGUARD O UTDOORv. C ITY OF L OS A NGELES
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

 Decided: September 22, 2014

S14A0763. THE STATE v. HOOD.

BLACKWELL, Justice.

James Hood was tried by a Clarke County jury, convicted of murder and

several other crimes, and sentenced for the murder to a termof imprisonment for

life with the possibility of parole. The State appeals, contending that Hood

instead should have been sentenced to imprisonment for life without the

possibility of parole. The problem is, Hood filed a timely motion for new trial,

his motion was pending when the State filed its notice of appeal, and as far as

we know, his motion still is pending today.

At this point, the State’s notice of appeal has not yet ripened, and the trial

court retains jurisdiction to dispose of the motion for new trial. See Housing

Auth. of City of Atlanta v. Geter, 252 Ga. 196, 197 (312 SE2d 309) (1984). If

the motion for new trial is granted, the judgment from which the State now

seeks to appeal will be set aside, and the notice of appeal previously filed by the

State will be rendered moot, although the State might then, of course, file
another notice of appeal to exercise its statutory prerogative to appeal from the

grant of a new trial. See OCGA § 5-7-1 et seq. If the motion for new trial is

denied, the judgment from which the State now seeks to appeal will stand, and

the notice of appeal previously filed by the State then will ripen. See, e.g., Heard

v. State, 274 Ga. 196, 197 (1), n. 2 (552 SE2d 818) (2001); Miller v. State, 273

Ga. 831, n. 1 (546 SE2d 524) (2001); Hann v. State, 292 Ga. App. 719, 720 (1)

(665 SE2d 731) (2008); Hearst v. State, 212 Ga. App. 492, 494 (2) (441 SE2d

914) (1994); O’Kelly v. State, 196 Ga. App. 860 (1) (397 SE2d 197) (1990);

Hope v. State, 193 Ga. App. 202, 203 (1) (a) (387 SE2d 414) (1989). In the

meantime, however, this case properly remains within the jurisdiction of the trial

court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

1

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.

1

See generallyChristopher J. McFadden et al.,Ga.Appellate Practice, §§ 11:16-11:23

(2013-2014 ed.).

2
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Rafeh Hulays, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Netfone, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Netfone, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Netfone, Inc.

Date: May 18, 2007

/s/ Rafeh Hulays                                              

Rafeh Hulays

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial 

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

CW1214196.1
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield Asset Management Barbados Inc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  Dated:April 26, 2011/s/ Samuel PollockSamuel PollockCEO, Brookfield Infrastructure Group   Corporation  1
Keyan D. RAMOS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2013

p0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2013

146673

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146673

COA: 313595

Saginaw CC: 11-036598-FC

JOSEPH JEQUAN-ANTON GONZALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 2, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A. Cloutier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     |  |  |  |                         
|---------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|/s/ PAUL A. CLOUTIER                                 |  |  |  | Dated: November 13, 2006
|Paul A. Cloutier                                     |  |  |  |                         
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



49