alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

KEVIN DALE LUHR,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00686-EDL (RMI)

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES UNDER

Re: Dkt. No. 30

Having considered Plaintiff’s motion for fees (dkt. 30), Defendant’s response (dkt. 31), 

and the Parties’ competing proposed orders (dkts. 34-1 and 34-2), the court finds that the 25% 

contingency fee of $27,510.43 is reasonable and allowable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A). The 

court previously awarded $4,788.53 in fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) (see 

dkt. 29), an amount that has already been received by Plaintiff’s counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s 

motion for fees under § 406(b)(1) in the amount of $27,510.43 is GRANTED; the Commissioner 

is directed to certify payment in that amount to Plaintiff’s counsel and Plaintiff’s counsel is 

ORDERED to refund $4,788.53 to Plaintiff upon receipt of that award. As to the Parties’

disagreement (see dkt. 34) regarding counsel’s request for a “net award,” the court disagrees with 

that interpretation and instead adopts Defendant’s position. See e.g. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 

U.S. 789, 796 (2002) (“Congress harmonized fees payable by the Government under EAJA with 

fees payable under § 406(b) out of the claimant’s past-due Social Security benefits in this manner: 

Fee awards may be made under both prescriptions, but the claimant’s attorney must refund to the 

claimant the amount of the smaller fee.”) (emphasis added) (citations omitted).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2021

ROBERT M. ILLMAN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00686-EDL Document 35 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0896. DOUGLAS EUGENE TAYLOR v. THE STATE.

In 2003, Douglas Eugene Taylor pled guilty to criminal attempt to commit

armed robbery. Following his incarceration, Taylor began serving the probated

portion of his sentence. In 2015, his probation wasrevoked. Taylor subsequently filed

a motion for out-of-time appeal, challenging the probation revocation order. The trial

court denied the motion, and Taylor filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. 

Because the underlying subject matter of the appeal is the revocation of

Taylor’s probation, he was required to file an application for discretionary appeal in

order to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5); White v. State, 233 Ga. App. 873 (505

SE2d 228) (1998). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct

appeal, which is therefore DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 23, 2017

01/23/2017
EX PARTE K.E.M., Sr.

(In re: C.A.S. v. K.E.M., Sr.)

2170464

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 14, 2018

Transferred to Houston Cir. Ct.
## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 10343

____________________

CLARISSA GILMORE,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the State of Georgia, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his official capacity, ALBERTA W. MILTON, individually and in her official capacity, SABRINI CARLENE LUPO, individually and in her official capacity, SMITH SP WARD EN, in his official capacity as successor

- in

- interest, et al., USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 65-1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Order of the Court 23

- 10343

Defendants

- Appellees,

DOUGLAS M. WILLIAMS, individually and in his official capacity,

Defendant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 6:18

- cv

- 00115

- RSB

- CLR

____________________
Before W ILLIAM P RYOR , Chief Judge

, W ILSON , J ORDAN , R OSENBAUM , J ILL P RYOR , N EWSOM , B RANCH , G RANT , L UCK , L AGOA , B RASHER , and A BUDU , Circuit Judges

.
BY THE COURT: A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether thisappeal should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted infavor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.

. USCA11 Case: 23-10343 Document: 65-1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024 Page: 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 12, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 12, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0140. SI COURTYARD 20, LLC v. JASMIN VARGAS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2020CV00994
STATE of Louisiana v. Ryan BOUDREAUX

NO. 2018-KH-1627

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied.
# L_2020191EN.01000201.xml

| 16.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 191/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 191/2

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/396 of 7 March 2017 implementing Article 9(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 60 of 8 March 2017
  )

On pages 29 and 30, Annex, point (b) (List of entities referred to in Articles 2 and 2a), entry 5 (FORCES DEMOCRATIQUES DE LIBERATION DU RWANDA (FDLR)), seventh and eighth paragraphs:

for:

‘... The November 2012 Group of Experts report also reports 11 killings by the FDLR in Bushibwambombo, Kalehe on 6 April 2012, and FDLR involvement in 19 further killings in Masisi territory, including five minors and six women, in May. The Mouvement Du 23 Mars (M23) is an armed group operating in the DRC that has been the recipient of arms and related materiel, including advice, training, and assistance related to military activities.

Several eyewitness testimonies state that M23 receives general military supplies from the Rwandan Defense Forces (RDF) in the form of weapons and ammunition in addition to materiel support for combat operations. M23 has been complicit in and responsible for committing serious violations of international law involving the targeting of women and children in situations of armed conflict in the DRC including killing and maiming, sexual violence, abduction, and forced displacement. According to numerous reports, investigations, and testimonies from eyewitnesses, M23 has been responsible for carrying out mass killings of civilians, as well as raping women and children throughout various regions of the DRC. Several reports indicate that M23 fighters have carried out 46 rapes against women and girls, the youngest of which was 8 years old. In addition to reports of sexual violence, M23 has also carried out extensive forced recruitment campaigns of children into the ranks of the group. It is estimated that M23 has carried out the forced recruitment of 146 young men and boys in the Rutshuru territory alone in eastern DRC since July 2012. Some of the victims have been as young as 15 years old. The atrocities committed by M23 against the civilian population of the DRC, as well as M23's forced recruitment campaign, and being the recipient of arms and military assistance has dramatically contributed to instability and conflict within the region and in some instances, violated international law.’,

read:

‘... The November 2012 Group of Experts report also reports 11 killings by the FDLR in Bushibwambombo, Kalehe on 6 April 2012, and FDLR involvement in 19 further killings in Masisi territory, including five minors and six women, in May.’.

---
Exhibit 32.1
   1.
    
    Dionex Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008,
and to which this Certification is attached (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.
 By:
    
    /s/ Lukas BraunschweilerName: Lukas BraunschweilerTitle: President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDate: November 7, 2008
Carlton D. HOLLIMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0735

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 04, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Cory Devon WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12-9848.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2013.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 20556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10431]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


United States International Trade Commission

[USITC SE-95-011]

TIME AND DATE: May 2, 1995 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS:

    1. Agenda for future meeting.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-699 (Final) (Stainless Steel Angle from 
Japan)--briefing and vote.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: April 24, 1995.

    By order of the Commission:
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10431 Filed 4-24-95; 3:51 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Timothy REEVES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-218

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Anton io, Texas

October 4, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00641

- CV

IN RE R. Wayne JOHNSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On August 27, 2018, the underlying case was removed to federal court. On September

19, 2018, this court issued an order abating this mandamus proceeding and removing the

proceeding from this court’s active docket. This proceeding will be reinstated only upon the

filing of a certified copy of a remand order from the federal court.

On October 1, 2018, relator filed a pro se “Amended Writ of Mandamus.” Because the

underlying case has been removed to federal court, this court may “proceed no further unless and

until the case is remanded.” Meyerland Co. v. F.D.I.C. , 848 S.W.2d 82, 83 (Tex. 1993) (quoting

28 U.S.C. § 1446(d)) (order). Therefore, this court may not take any action on the “Amended

Writ of Mandamus.”

It is so ORDERED on this 4th day of October, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CVK001331D3, styled R. Wayne Johnson v. Peter O'Rou rke, et al.

, pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo

presiding.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

102288955\V-2

Case No. 3:17-cv-00224

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR 

PERSONS

ANDREW S. AZARMI (SBN 241407)

andrew.azarmi@dentons.com

DENTONS US LLP

One Market Plaza

Spear Tower, 24th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: 415.267.4000

Facsimile: 415.267.4198

Attorneys for Defendants ECC CENTCOM 

Constructors, LLC and ECC International, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ASPIC ENGINEERING AND 

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ECC CENTCOM CONSTRUCTORS, LLC 

AND ECC INTERNATIONAL, LLC,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00224

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED 

ENTITIES OR PERSONS OF 

DEFENDANTS ECC CENTCOM 

CONSTRUCTORS, LLC AND ECC 

INTERNATIONAL, LLC
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

102288955\V-2

1 Case No. 3:17-cv-00224

CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR 

PERSONS

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-15, the undersigned certifies that the following listed persons, 

associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other 

entities (i) have a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the 

proceeding, or (ii) have a non-financial interest in that subject matter or in a party that could be 

substantially affected by the outcome of this proceeding: 

1. Environmental Chemical Corporation. Environmental Chemical Corporation is the 

sole member of Defendants, Arbitration Respondents, ECC CENTCOM Constructors, LLC and 

ECC International, LLC.

2. Environmental Chemical Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ECC 

ESOP”). The ECC ESOP owns 49 percent of Environmental Chemical Corporation.

3. Mr. Paul Sabharwal, Chairman, Environmental Chemical Corporation Board of 

Directors. Mr. Sabharwal owns 30.5 percent of Environmental Chemical Corporation.

4. Mr. Manjiv S. Vohra, Environmental Chemical Corporation President and Chief 

Executive Officer. Mr. Vohra owns 20.5 percent of Environmental Chemical Corporation. 

DATED: January 17, 2017 DENTONS US LLP

By: /s/ Andrew S. Azarmi

Andrew S. Azarmi

Attorneys for Defendants ECC CENTCOM 

Constructors, LLC and ECC International, LLC
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 633 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 633

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2022, as ``Silver Star 
                         Service Banner Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2022

    Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mr. Hawley) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2022, as ``Silver Star 
                         Service Banner Day''.

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill 
        members of the Armed Forces;
Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the 
        Armed Forces and veterans who were wounded or became ill in combat in 
        the wars fought by the United States;
Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to help the people of the 
        United States remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill 
        members of the Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver Star 
        Service Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose;
Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of America is to evoke 
        memories of the sacrifices made by members of the Armed Forces and 
        veterans on behalf of the United States through the presence of a Silver 
        Star Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying;
Whereas the sacrifices made by members of the Armed Forces and veterans on 
        behalf of the United States should never be forgotten; and
Whereas May 1, 2022, is an appropriate date to designate as ``Silver Star 
        Service Banner Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of May 1, 2022, as ``Silver 
        Star Service Banner Day''; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        Silver Star Service Banner Day with appropriate programs, 
        ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Asher
Zwebner, the Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Director of Majic Wheels Corp, certifies, under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and  results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
  Date:
      March 27, 2009
                MAJIC
      WHEELS CORP.By:
                /s/ Asher ZwebnerName: Asher Zwebner
                  Title:    Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                  FinancialOfficer and Director (Principal
                  Executive, Financial andAccounting Officer)
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exhibit_4-1.htm


    EXHIBIT 4.1

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Certificate
      No.   Incorporated under the Laws of
      the State of
  Delaware    Shares

            


    

          
XXX                                                                                                                                                       - XXX,XXX
-

                                                                  CUSIP
65505 10 5

    


    Noble
Medical Technologies, Inc.

    20,000,000
AUTHORIZED SHARES  PAR VALUE $.0001 COMMON STOCK

    


    


    


    This
Certifies That  - Specimen 
- is the owner of

    


              -
XXXXXXXXXX
(XXX,XXX)-___________________                                                      

    shares
of Noble Medical Technologies, Inc. Common Stock

    


    transferable
on the books of the Corporation by the holder in person or by duly authorized
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

    


    Witness, the signatures of its duly
authorized officers.

    Dated:     

    


    Corporate
Seal

    
 

    Assistant
Secretary                                                President


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    The following abbreviations, when used
in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though
they were written out in full according to applicable laws and
regulations:

    


    
      	
              TEN
      COM   - as tenants in common

            	
              UNIF
      TRANSFERS MIN ACT - _______ Custodian
_________

            


    

      (Cust.)                      (Minor)

    Under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
____________________

          (State)

    TEN
ENT    - as tenants by the entirety

    


    JTWROS    -
as Joint tenants with right of survivorship

    


    Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not on the above list

    


    For
value received   hereby sell,
assign and transfer unto

    


    


                  (Please
insert social security number, I.D. Number of Transferee)

    


    


    


    ( Please print name and address of
transferee)

    


    


    


    


    


    


    


                         
shares represented by this certificate and hereby do irrevocably
appoint

    


                                                                      attorney to transfer the said
shares on the books of the corporation with full power of substitution in the
premises.

    


    Dated


    


    


    
 

    
      	
                 (Signature)

            	
              (Second
      Signature, if applicable)

            


    

    


    


    


    In
presence of  


    
      
         
Page 2
S.D.P.J. v. STATE

CR-16-0329

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied February 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 22

- 1439

_____________________________
H ARRIS D. W ALKER ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 9, 2022

P ER C URIAM

. The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on the merits.

B.L. T HOMAS and W INOKUR , JJ., concur ; K ELSEY , J., dissents without opinion.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Harris D. Walker, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
Phillip KESSLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5444

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 21, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Louis MERCADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Mark JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3767

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.