alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32266]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule for the forthcoming meeting of 
the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission. Notice of this meeting 
is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-
463). Meeting Date and Time: January 26, 1995; 2 p.m. until 6 p.m. 
Address: Hampton Inn, 4646 Constitution, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
    The business meeting will be open to the public. Space and 
facilities to accommodate members of the public are limited and persons 
will be accommodated on a first-come, first served basis. The Chairman 
will permit attendees to address the Commission, but may restrict the 
length of presentations. An agenda will be available from the National 
Park Service, Midwest Region, 1 week prior to the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan M. Hutchings, Acting Associate 
Regional Director, Planning and Resource Preservation, National Park 
Service, Midwest Region, 1709 Jackson Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102, 
(402) 221-3082.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mississippi River Corridor Study 
Commission was established by Public Law 101-398, September 28, 1990.

    Dated: December 21, 1994.
William W. Schenk,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 94-32266 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Exhibit 31.2

 

Sarbanes - Oxley Section 302 Certification

 
| I, James J. Judge, certify that: |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |
| 1.                     | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CEC Funding, LLC (the Registrant) and other reports containing distribution information for the period covered by the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
| 2.                     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3.                     | Based on my knowledge, the financial information required to be provided to the trustee under the governing documents of the issuer is included in these reports; and |
| 4.                     | Based on my knowledge, Commonwealth Electric Company, the Servicer, has complied with its servicing obligations and minimum servicing standards. |
|  

                    |   |

 
|                                                                                                                                                          |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 2, 2005                       |   By:   | /s/ JAMES J. JUDGE                       |
|                                                                                                                                                          |                        | James J. Judge                                                                                                                                         |
|                                                                                                                                                          |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |   | Senior Vice President, Treasurer |
|                                                                                                                                                          |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |   | and Chief Financial Officer |
Timothy C. HUDSON, DOC #085756, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1480

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT

      This Amendment No. 3 ("Amendment"), dated as of February 2, 2009, to the
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2000 (as amended to date, the "Rights
Agreement"), between Compuware Corporation, a Michigan corporation (the
"Company"), and Equiserve Trust Company, N.A., a National Banking Association,
now known as Computershare Trust Company N.A., (the "Rights Agent").

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent have entered into the Rights
Agreement specifying the terms of the Rights (as defined therein);

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent desire to amend the Rights
Agreement in accordance with Section 28 of the Rights Agreement.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements set
forth in the Rights Agreement and this Amendment, the parties hereby agree as
follows:

      1. The definition of "Final Expiration Date" in the Rights Agreement is
amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

            "Final Expiration Date" shall mean the Close of Business on May 9,
            2012.

      2. Section 2 of the Rights Agreement is amended and restated in its
entirety as follows:

            "The Company hereby appoints the Rights Agent to acts as agent for
            the Company in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof, and
            the Rights Agent hereby accepts such appointment. The Company may
            from time to time appoint such co-Rights Agents as it may deem
            necessary and desirable, upon ten (10) days' prior written notice to
            the Rights Agent. The Rights Agent shall have no duty to supervise,
            and in no event be liable for, the acts and omissions of any such
            co-Rights Agent".

      3. The Form of Right Certificate attached to the Agreement as Exhibit B,
as amended, is hereby amended by replacing all references to "May 9, 2009"
therein with "May 9, 2012".

      4. The Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares attached to the
Agreement as Exhibit C, as amended, is hereby amended by replacing all
references to "May 9, 2009" therein with "May 9, 2012".

      5. The term "Agreement" as used in the Rights Agreement shall be deemed to
refer to the Rights Agreement as amended hereby.

      6. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

<PAGE>

      7. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed, all as of the day and year first above written.

COMPUWARE CORPORATION                    COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.

By: /s/ Daniel S. Follis Jr.             By: /s/ Dennis V. Mocchia
    --------------------------------          ------------------------------

Name:  Daniel S. Follis Jr.              Name:  Dennis V. Mocchia
Title: V.P., General Counsel             Title: Manager, Contract Administration
       & Secretary


                                                                               2
Matter of Davis 2023 NY Slip Op 34557(U) December 28, 2023 Surrogate's Court, New York County
Docket Number: File No. 2020-1709/A/B/C Judge: Hilary Gingold Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

Op 30001 (U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New

York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

### [* 1]

### [* 2]

### [* 3]

### [* 4]
Cheryl L. SCHWALB, Appellant, v. CARMEL AT the CALIFORNIA CLUB PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D18-1262

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of A & J Venture Capital Group, Inc. on Form 10-K /A for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Antal Markus

Antal Markus

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 15, 2011




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company  for purposes of




Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 29 (Thursday, February 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02560]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 13, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 6, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1328 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1175, K2025-1175.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-02560 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit 99.1**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of 

ChoicePoint Inc. 

We have audited the consolidatedfinancial statements of ChoicePoint Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, and have issued our reports thereon dated February 28, 2008, (which report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraphs relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share Based Payment”, effective January 1, 2006, SFAS No. 158, “EmployerAccounting for Defined Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans”, effective December 31, 2006, FASB Interpretation No, 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, effective January 1, 2007, and the signed agreement andplan of merger on February 20, 2008 to sell the Company); such consolidated financial statements and reports are included in your 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders and are incorporated herein by reference. Our audits also included theconsolidated financial statement schedule of the Company listed in Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based onour audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forththerein. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta,Georgia 

February 28, 2008
#### Marcos ALVAREZ CASTILLO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 03-7963.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 25, 2004.

Decided: April 30, 2004.

Marcos Alvarez Castillo, Appellant pro se.

*132Josephine Frances Whalen, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Marcos Alvarez Castillo seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Castillo has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 376 

Designating the week of September 19 through September 25, 2021, as 

‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH (for herself, Mr. WARNOCK, and Mr. BRAUN) submitted 

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of September 19 through September 

25, 2021, as ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Week’’. 

Whereas the last Sunday in September— 

(1) is designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s Day’’ 

under section 111 of title 36, United States Code; and 

(2) was first designated as ‘‘Gold Star Mother’s 

Day’’ under the Joint Resolution entitled ‘‘Joint Resolution designating the last Sunday in September as ‘Gold 

Star Mother’s Day’, and for other purposes’’, approved 

June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895); 

Whereas there is no date dedicated to families affected by the 

loss of a loved one who died in service to the United 

States; 

Whereas a gold star symbolizes a family member who died in 

the line of duty while serving in the Armed Forces; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 376 ATS 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces, 

through their service, bear the burden of protecting the 

freedom of the people of the United States; 

Whereas the selfless example of the service of the members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces, as well as the sacrifices made by the families of those individuals, inspires 

all individuals in the United States to sacrifice and work 

diligently for the good of the United States; and 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

of the Armed Forces and the families of veterans of the 

Armed Forces should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of September 19 

3 through September 25, 2021, as ‘‘Gold Star Fami4 lies Remembrance Week’’; 

5 (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made 

6 by— 

7 (A) the families of members of the Armed 

8 Forces who made the ultimate sacrifice in order 

9 to defend freedom and protect the United 

10 States; and 

11 (B) the families of veterans of the Armed 

12 Forces; and 

13 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

14 to observe Gold Star Families Remembrance Week 

15 by— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 376 ATS 

1 (A) performing acts of service and good 

2 will in their communities; and 

3 (B) celebrating families in which loved 

4 ones made the ultimate sacrifice so that others 

5 could continue to enjoy life, liberty, and the 

6 pursuit of happiness. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ex10-6.htm


    Exhibit
10.6 – Order Confirming Visitalk.com, Inc.’s Second Joint Plan of
Reorganization

    


    SO
ORDERED.

    


    Dated:
August 27, 2004

    

     

     

    

    REDFIELD
T. BAUM, SR

    U.S.
Bankruptcy Judge

    


    Mark J.
Giunta (#015079)

    Law
Office of Mark J. Giunta

    845 N.
Third Ave.

    Phoenix,
AZ 85003-1408

    Phone
(602) 307-0837

    Fax (602)
307-0838

    Email:
mark.giunta@azbar.org

    Attorney
for visitalk.Com, Inc.

    


    IN THE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

    FOR THE
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

    


    
      	
              In
      re:

              VISITALK.COM,
      INC.,

              Tax
      I.D. #86-0930147

              Debtor,

            	
              Chapter
      11 Proceeding

              Case
      No. 00-13035-PHX-RTB

              ORDER
      CONFIRMING DEBTOR’S SECOND 

              JOINT
      PLAN OF REORGANIZATION DATED JUNE 22,
2004

            


    

    


    A
confirmation hearing having been held on the 3rd day of August, 2004 at 9:00
a.m. on the Debtor’s Second Joint Plan of Reorganization Dated June 22, 2004
(“Plan”); the Debtor having filed a Ballot Report on July 29, 2004 setting forth
Classes 4, 5, 7, and 8 as accepting impaired classes and Classes 6 and 9 as
rejecting classes; the Debtor having submitted the Declaration Of Gerry Mayo
dated August 2, 2004 in support of the Debtor’s Plan setting forth evidence
satisfying the required elements of 11 U.S.C. section 1129(a) and (b); no
parties having filed an
objection to the Plan; all loans that were extended to the Debtor during the
course of the bankruptcy that were approved by the Court arose in the ordinary
course of the trade or business of the Debtor, and good cause appearing
therefor,


    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

    IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the Debtor’s Plan is confirmed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section
1129.

    


    IT IS
FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that no executory contract or unexpired lease with
Veritas Software Corporation (including but not limited to any and all licenses
of computer software, source code or object code for software, trademarks,
service marks or intellectual property within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Section
101(35A)) is assumed by the Debtor pursuant to the Plan or
otherwise.

    

      
        	
                Dated:____________________

              	
                _____________________________

              
	 
      	
                The
      Honorable Redfield T. Baum

              
	 
      	
                U.S.
      Bankruptcy Court

              


      

    

    
      
        
        

      

      
        -2-
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER OF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LPPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for three months ended March 31,2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Randy Moeder, Chief Executive Officer and President ofHiland Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Partners, LP (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | May 13, 2005                           | /s/ Randy Moeder |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
|   | Randy Moeder                           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  and President |

 

1

----