alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH GRIMES, D72759,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

NURSE BROOKS,

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 17-0043 CRB (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the California Medical

Facility (CMF), filed a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging

that, while he was incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison (SVSP), Nurse

Brooks delayed and/or interfered with his medical care. 

On April 11, 2017, the court (Lloyd, M.J.) found that, liberally construed,

plaintiff’s allegations appeared to state a cognizable § 1983 claim for violation of

the Eighth Amendment against Brooks, and issued an order of service. But on

May 5, 2017, SVSP’s litigation coordinator returned the service documents with

a letter indicating that Nurse Brooks never worked at SVSP. 

On May 6, 2017, the court (Lloyd, M.J.) directed plaintiff to file a notice

providing the court with current and accurate location information for Defendant

Brooks such that the United States Marshal is able to effect service within

twenty-eight (28) days, or face dismissal of his complaint without prejudice

pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff instead
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

filed a motion requesting an extension of time to provide the court the requested

information to allow him time to review his medical records to obtain the

necessary information. 

On June 13, 2017, the court (Lloyd, M.J.) granted plaintiff an extension of

time until July 13, 2017 to provide the court with current and accurate location

information for Defendant Brooks such that the Marshal is able to effect service,

or face dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). Plaintiff instead filed

a motion for a second extension of time until August 11, 2017.

On July 14, 2017, this action was reassigned to the undersigned and, on

July 26, 2017, the court granted plaintiff a second extension of time until August

11, 2017 to provide the court with current and accurate location information for

Defendant Brooks such that the Marshal is able to effect service, or face

dismissal of this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m).

But more than a week has passed since plaintiff’s August 11, 2017

deadline expired and he still has not provided the court with any location

information for Defendant Brooks. This action accordingly is DISMISSED

without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m).

The clerk is instructed to terminate all motions as moot and close the file. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.17\Grimes, J.17-0043.dismissal.wpd

August 22, 2017
Dennis Lee HARGROVE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1347

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# L_2018329EN.01005301.xml

| 27.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 329/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 329/53

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2018/1695 of 6 November 2018 amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the period of application of the optional reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 282 of 12 November 2018
  )

On page 7, Article 1, the following point is added:

| ‘(4) | Article 193 is replaced by the following:

  “Article 193
  VAT shall be payable by any taxable person carrying out a taxable supply of goods or services, except where it is payable by another person in the cases referred to in Articles 194 to 199b and Article 202.”’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(4)

“Article 193

VAT shall be payable by any taxable person carrying out a taxable supply of goods or services, except where it is payable by another person in the cases referred to in Articles 194 to 199b and Article 202.”’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                              460,745
<SECURITIES>                        203,210
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,295,429
<ALLOWANCES>                        126,754
<INVENTORY>                         461,842
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,852,835
<PP&E>                              562,893
<DEPRECIATION>                      793,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,622,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,489,269
<BONDS>                              40,000
<COMMON>                                 73
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                        2,120,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,622,402
<SALES>                           1,859,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,859,019
<CGS>                               972,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,683,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      2,857
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     181,456
<INCOME-TAX>                         58,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 123,390
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        123,390
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.63
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 19999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10170]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 78 / Monday, April 24, 1995 / 
Presidential Documents

____________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President  
[[Page 19999]] 


                Proclamation 6786 of April 20, 1995

                
Victims of the Oklahoma City Bombing

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                On April 19, 1995, the Alfred P. Murrah Federal 
                Building in Oklahoma City was brutally bombed in an 
                appalling act of cowardice. As a mark of respect for 
                those killed in the bombing, I hereby order, by the 
                authority vested in me as President of the United 
                States of America by section 175 of title 36 of the 
                United States Code, that the flag of the United States 
                shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and 
                upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military 
                posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of 
                the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and 
                throughout the United States and its Territories and 
                possessions through Monday, April 24, 1995. I also 
                direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for 
                the same length of time at all United States embassies, 
                legations, consular offices, and other facilities 
                abroad, including all military facilities and naval 
                vessels and stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                twentieth day of April, in the year of our Lord 
                nineteen hundred and ninety-five, and of the 
                Independence of the United States of America the two 
                hundred and nineteenth.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1>><Clinton2>

[FR Doc. 95-10170
Filed 4-20-95; 3:04 pm]
Billing code 3195-01-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 16, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00357

- CV

Ernest Wayne Rials, Appellant

v.

Linda Katherine Rials, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JO NES, JUSTICES ROSE A ND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON A GREED MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on May 19, 2014. The parties filed a

joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal.

E ach party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, b oth in this Court and the court

below

, and this decision shall be certified below for observance

.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2016

d0922 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2016

153021 & (21)

SPENCER B. GUPPY, a minor, by his

Next Friend PAULA J. GUPPY,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153021

COA: 328889

Kent CC: 14

- 003811

- NO

WYOMING COMMUNITY CHURCH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to a ppeal the December 7, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should now be reviewed by this Court.

The stay of trial court proceedings, ordered on August 17, 2016 is DISSOLVED.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arch Management
Services Inc. Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Nigel Johnson, President,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal
Accounting Officer, of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.


Date: April 13, 2005



By:  /s/ Nigel Johnson
Nigel Johnson
President, Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
Secretary, and a member of the Board of Directors
Michael KIM and Trail Management, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WESTWATER CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1528

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jennifer FINEGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3822

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Jamichael S. TRIBUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5028

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 7, 2019

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Bilbrey, J.

Jamichael S. Tribue was placed on probation following a no contest plea to burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. Adjudication of guilt was withheld. He violated probation and was then restored to probation. He was again alleged to have violated *1178probation. Following a hearing, the trial court orally revoked Tribue's probation after he was found to have committed a new violation of law. Tribue appeals the judgment and sentence.

Tribue's appointed counsel was unable to make a good faith argument that error occurred and filed an *Anders** brief. We have reviewed the record and find there is competent, substantial evidence supporting the trial court's determination that Tribue violated probation. However, as Tribue's counsel has noted, there is no written order of probation. Further, the judgment of conviction subsequently entered, which adjudicated Tribue guilty of the underlying offenses, incorrectly lists the burglary conviction as burglary of a dwelling while armed rather than burglary of a dwelling. Therefore, this judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment and a written order of revocation of probation. Appellant need not be present for entry of the corrected judgment or the written order of revocation.

REVERSED and REMANDED .

Ray and Jay, JJ., concur.

*

*Anders v. California* , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
##### 



Discretionary Option Grants
 Dionex Corporation  2004 Equity Incentive Plan
 Stock Option Agreement  (Incentive Stock Option or Nonstatutory Stock Option)
   1. Vesting.
 2. Number of Shares and Exercise Price.
 3. Exercise Restriction for Non-Exempt Employees. i.e. Non-Exempt Employee
 4. Exercise prior to Vesting (Early Exercise). i.e. provided, however,
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 1.




---



##### 



(d)
 5. Method of Payment. permitted by your Grant Notice,
 (a) The Wall Street Journal
 (b) The Wall Street Journal
 (c)
 6. Whole Shares.
 7. Securities Law Compliance.
 2.




---



##### 



8. Term.
 (a) provided, however,
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
  3.




---



##### 



9. Exercise.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 10. Transferability.
 (a)
 (b)
 11. Option Not a Service Contract.
 4.




---



##### 



12. Withholding Obligations.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 13. Notices.
 14. Governing Plan Document.
 5.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 13, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 4, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 612 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 9559)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1170, K2025-1170.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-02562 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     I, Vasan Thatham, Chief Financial Officer of Provo International, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18 of the
United States Code that:

     1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2003, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Vasan Thatham
April 29, 2004                          ---------------------------------------
                                        Vasan Thatham
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Louis T. PIERCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3249

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Kevin JOHNSON

No. 2019-K-259

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

Writ denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.

HUGHES, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

Hughes, J., additionally concurring.

Defendant argues he maintained his innocence and pointed his attorneys to two witnesses, Selena Collins and Montero Ursin, but they failed to investigate or interview these witnesses which forced defendant to accept a guilty plea. Selena Collins has now presented an affidavit indicating she was pressured to implicate the defendant.

Defendant's claims are better suited for post-conviction relief with a full evidentiary hearing.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1





Gordon A. Ulsh


President and


Chief Executive Officer




Exide Technologies


Corporate Headquarters


13000 Deerfield Parkway, Bldg. 200


Alpharetta, GA 30004


678-556-9000 tel


678-566-9171 fax


www.exide.com



January 28, 2009



Board of Directors of Exide Technologies


13000 Deerfield Parkway


Building 200


Alpharetta, Georgia 30004



Gentlemen:



As you know, under the terms of my Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Employment
Agreement”), dated January 31, 2008, Section 5(a) provides that my salary shall be increased to no
less than $1,000,000 effective April 1, 2009. Given the current economic environment, and the
Company’s decision to defer indefinitely annual merit increases for salaried employees not subject
to collective bargaining agreements, I propose the following amendments to my Employment Agreement:




	 	•	 	The scheduled increase in my base salary specified in Section 5(a) of the Employment
Agreement will be deferred or postponed indefinitely, subject to being reinstated at a
later date pursuant to the provisions of the following bullet point.






	 	•	 	Upon providing written notice to the Board of Directors of my intention to activate my
base salary increase from $950,000 to an amount not less than $1,000,000, my salary will
increase to $1,000,000 per annum (or such higher amount as may be established by the
Board), which increase will become effective beginning with the next bi-monthly pay period
after such notice is given and shall not be retroactive to April 1, 2009.






	 	•	 	Any Bonus or Equity Awards, payable for fiscal 2010, will be based on a base salary of
$950,000, unless I have provided written notice to the Board of Directors of my decision to
re-instate my base salary increase prior to March 15, 2010.





Defined terms are used as defined in the Employment Agreement unless otherwise defined in this
letter. If this amendment to the Employment Agreement is acceptable to the Board of Directors,
please sign and date below.



      /s/ Gordon A. Ulsh—


Gordon A. Ulsh



      /s/ John P. Reilly—


John P. Reilly


Chairman


Date: January 28, 2009
# L_2019008EN.01003803.xml

| 10.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/38

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1921 of 4 December 2018 amending Implementing Decision 2013/191/EU authorising Latvia to introduce a special measure derogating from point (a) of Article 26(1) and Articles 168 and 168a of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 311 of 7 December 2018
  )

On page 36, recital 9:

for:

‘Implementing Decision 2013/191/EU should therefore be amended accordingly,’,

read:

‘Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 should therefore be amended accordingly,’.

On page 37, Article 1:

for:

‘Article 6 of Implementing Decision 2013/191/EU is replaced by the following:

...’,

read:

‘Article 6 of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 is replaced by the following:

...’.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAND 435 

(CAND Rev. 02/2015)

TRANSCRIPT ORDER 

Please use one form per court reporter. 

 CJA counsel please use Form CJA24 

Please read instructions on next page.

1a. CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS ORDER 2a. CONTACT PHONE NUMBER 3. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS 1b. ATTORNEY NAME (if different) 2b. ATTORNEY PHONE NUMBER 3. ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRES4. MAILING ADDRESS (INCLUDE LAW FIRM NAME, IF APPLICABLE) 5. CASE NAME 

8. THIS TRANSCRIPT ORDER IS FOR: 

7. COURT REPORTER NAME ( FOR FTR, LEAVE BLANK AND CHECK BOX)ޫ FTR 倯 APPEAL 

倯 NON-APPEAL 

倯 CRIMINAL 倯 CIVIL 

倯 In forma pauperis (NOTE: Court or

 CJA: Do not use this form; use Form C

9. TRANSCRIPT(S) REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested), format(s) & quantity and delivery type: 

a. HEARING(S) (OR PORTIONS OF HEARINGS) b. SELECT FORMAT(S) (NOTE: ECF access is included 

with purchase of PDF, text, paper or condensed.)

c . DELIVERY TYP

DATE JUDGE 

(initials)

TYPE 

(e.g. CMC) 

PORTION 

If requesting less than full hearing, 

specify portion (e.g. witness or time) 

PDF

(email) 

TEXT/ASCII 

(email) 

PAPER CONDENSED 

(email) 

ECF ACCESS

(web) 

ORDINARY

(30-day) 

14-Day EX

F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F 

10. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, INSTRUCTIONS, QUESTIONS, ETC: ORDER & CERTIFICATION (11. & 12.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges (deposit plus additional). 12. DAT11. SIGNATURE DISTRIBUTION: 倯 COURT COPY 倯 TRANSCRIPTION COPY 倯 ORDER RECEIPT 

Jenel Day (510) 874-1114 jday@bsfllp.com

Edward H. Takashima (310) 752-2408 etakashima@bsf

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP401 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 850Santa Monica, CA 90401

Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorp

✔

✔

01/05/2018 NMC Discove ● ● ● 

Please email the final transcript to jday@bsfllp.com, kruiz@bsfllp.com and cseki@bsfllp.com, in addition to etakashima@bsfllp.

/s/ Edward H. Takashima 01/0

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 451 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 1