1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART NOKIA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No.17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART NOKIA’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1381, 1382, 1383

Before the Court is Nokia’s motion to seal portions of trial exhibit QX2778. ECF No. 

1381. Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court orders as follows:

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX2778 CX4321-007 to 008, selection including last 

six lines of 007 and first four lines of 008

DENIED.

QX2778 CX4321-008 to 009, section entitled “Nokia 

Technologies’ Program Rates for its Cellular 

SEPs.”

GRANTED as to the first full 

paragraph, including bullet 

points, and as to the second full 

paragraph. DENIED as to the

section title, the third full 

paragraph, and footnote 1.

QX2778 009-010, selection in the section entitled

“Nokia Solutions & Networks”

GRANTED.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1392 Filed 01/23/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART NOKIA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX2778 CX4321-010, third full paragraph on page GRANTED as to the last two 

sentences of the paragraph, 

DENIED as to the remainder.

QX2778 CX4321-014, selected paragraph following 

“Nokia Response to Specification No. 3”

GRANTED as to the last 

sentence of the paragraph, 

DENIED as to the remainder.

QX2778 CX4321-015 to 016, selected paragraphs 

following “Nokia Response to Specification 

No. 5”

GRANTED as to actual 

litigation costs numbers, 

otherwise DENIED.

QX2778 CX4321-017, selection following “Nokia 

Response to Specification No. 8”

DENIED.

Qualcomm previously submitted a more narrowly tailored sealing request regarding the 

section entitled “LTLO Rates and Terms for Cellular SEPs” located on page CX4321-009. ECF 

No. 1352. The Court granted Qualcomm’s request. ECF No. 1365. Accordingly, the Court now 

DENIES as moot Nokia’s request. Only the selections indicated by Qualcomm shall remain 

sealed.

Qualcomm filed two motions to remove the same document which was filed as ECF No. 

1377-2. Those two motions are ECF No. 1382 and 1383. The Court GRANTS Qualcomm’s 

motion at ECF No. 1382 and DENIES Qualcomm’s motion at ECF No. 1383 as moot.

Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to remove ECF No. 1377-2.

Qualcomm shall publicly file a redacted version of QX2778 consistent with the Court’s 

sealing rulings by January 24, 2019, at 12:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1392 Filed 01/23/19 Page 2 of 2