alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

          - [NARA-2025-015]

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice; SES Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Performance Review Board (PRB). The members of the PRB for the National Archives and Records Administration are: William J. Bosanko, Deputy Archivist; Valorie F. Findlater, Chief Management and Administration; and Ovnelle Millwood, acting Chief Human Capital Officer. These appointments supersede all previous appointments.

# DATES:

This appointment is effective on January 29, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ovnelle Millwood, Office of Human Capital, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740, (301) 837-3467.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The authority for this notice is 5 U.S.C. 4314(c), which also requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review Boards. The Board shall review the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor and recommend final action to the appointing authority regarding matters related to senior executive performance.

Colleen J. Shogan,

Archivist of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2025-01897 Filed 1-28-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
**Exhibit 15.1**

May 4, 2009 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc. 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-01459, 333-56577, 333-09867, 333-34543, 333-38163, 333-40675,333-40677, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189,333-101332, 333-101323, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586, 333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507, 333-138593, 333-147268 and 333-155155; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and 333-142795) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of ourreports dated November 3, 2008, February 2, 2009 and May 4, 2009, relating to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Forms 10-Q for the quarters endedSeptember 28, 2008, December 28, 2008 and March 29, 2009.
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**U.S. Bank Trust National Association**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the "Trustee"), as Trustee in respect of the STRATSSM Trust for AMBAC Financial Group, Inc. Securities, Series 2007-1 (the "Trust"), does hereby certify that:

| 1. | The Bank is Trustee under the Trust Agreement. |
|----|------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | A review of the Trustee's activities during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2008 and of its performance under the Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 11th day of             March 2009.

            By: /s/ Janet P. O'Hara               Name:  Janet P. O'Hara            Title: Assistant Vice President
L.S., Mother of L.S.-M., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-0570

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 25, 2019

Lawrence P. Cartelli, of Lawrence P. Cartelli, P.A., Tavares, for Appellant.

Kelley Schaeffer, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*557L.S., the mother of L.S.-M., a minor child, appeals the Order on Mother's Motion and Order Terminating Supervision and Relinquishing Jurisdiction that was entered without affording her an opportunity to present evidence.1 The circuit court expressly stated in its order that it did not perform a best interest analysis or address issues of time sharing at the hearing. This was error. Before permanently awarding custody to the father, the non-offending parent, the circuit court was required to hold an evidentiary hearing on Mother's motion for reunification to allow the circuit court to consider whether the child would be endangered by being returned to Mother's custody, and whether it was in the child's best interest to be returned to Mother's custody. *See* §§ 39.522(3), 39.621(11), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; *K.C. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams.*, 227 So. 3d 783, 783 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (reversing and remanding for evidentiary hearing where court awarded permanent custody to non-offending parent and closed the case without making finding that reunification with offending parent, who substantially complied with case plan, would either endanger child or not be in child's best interest pursuant to section 39.522(3) ); *see also**J.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams.*, 220 So. 3d 555, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (reiterating that offending parent is entitled to evidentiary hearing on motion for reunification); *In re E.G-S.*, 113 So. 3d 77, 80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ("To comport with due process when a child's permanent placement is at issue, a court must hold an evidentiary hearing." (citing *P.P. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs.*, 86 So. 3d 556, 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) )).

Accordingly, we reverse the order under review and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

1

The parties agree that Mother substantially complied with her case plan.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 1 3

- 1 0593 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8 : 12

- cr
- 0 0 318

- SDM

- TGW

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus

LARUE TERRY , Defendant

- Appellant.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________ (March 18, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT , HULL and MARCUS , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-10593 Date Filed: 03/18/2014 Page: 1 of 22 Rosemary Cakmis , counsel for Larue Terry in this direct criminal appeal , has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 7 38, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of mer it, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Terry ’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED

. Case: 13-10593 Date Filed: 03/18/2014 Page: 2 of 2
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00125-CV

__________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

C.D.B., Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. X-2289

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State of Texas, Appellant, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant filed the motion before the 

appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM
2

Submitted on May 18, 2022

Opinion Delivered May 19, 2022

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly Henderson, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: May
14, 2010




/s/ Molly HendersonMolly
      HendersonChief
      Business and Financial Officer and Senior Vice
  President





This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Alexis GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1862

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Opinion issued February 12, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00818-CV

———————————

SAAD S. SKARYA, Appellant

V.

ESTRELLA ROSA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 387th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 13-DCV-211578

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Saad S. Skarya, has neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 
2

(West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has 

not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to 

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1757; A15A1758; A15A1759. EARL PARRISH v. THE STATE.

Earl Parrish was sentenced to life in prison for rape, and his conviction was

affirmed on appeal. See Parrish v. State, 237 Ga. App. 274 (514 SE2d 458) (1999). 

Parrish filed several pro se motions seeking to vacate or set aside his allegedly void

sentence. The trial court denied the motions in orders entered on December 23, 2013

and November 17, 2014. Months later, Parrish sought to appeal these rulings and

filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The trial court denied the motion to

proceed in forma pauperis under OCGA § 9-15-2 (d) on the basis that the notices of

appeal were untimely and thus no relief could be granted. Parrish filed a motion for

reconsideration from this ruling, which the trial court denied on January 15, 2014. 

In Case Number A15A1757, Parrish seeks to appeal the order denying his

motion for reconsideration. In Case Number A15A1758, Parrish seeks to appeal the

trial court’s November 17, 2014 order. In Case Number A15A1759, Parrish seeks to

appeal the December 23, 2013 order. 

Under OCGA § 5-6-38 (a), a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after

entry of an appealable order. The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an

absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Rowland v. State, 264

Ga. 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Here, none of Parrish’s notices of appeal was

timely filed.

1 We thus lack jurisdiction to consider these appeals, which are hereby

1 The notice of appeal in Case Number A15A1757 was filed January 8, 2015,

almost a year after the trial court’s January 15, 2014 order. The notice of appeal in

Case Number A15A1758 was filed on December 19, 2014, 32 days after the trial

June 11, 2015
DISMISSED.2

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

court’s November 17 order. The notice of appeal in Case Number A15A1759 was

filed on September 29, 2014, 280 days after the trial court’s December 23, 2013

ruling.

2

In his notice of appeal in Case A15A1759, Parrish states that he did not

receive timely notice of the trial court’s December 2013 order, which was mailed to

the wrong prison. Regardless of the reason, however, this Court is without

jurisdiction to consider an untimelyappeal. See Atlantic- CanadianCorp. v. Hammer,

Siler, George Assoc., Inc., 167 Ga. App. 257, 257-258 (1) (306 SE2d 22) (1983).

Moreover, Parrish’s appeals suffer from additional jurisdictional defects, which we

need not address given the untimeliness of the notices of appeal. 

06/11/2015
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated March 28, 2014, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  Dated:  March 28, 2014   /s/   Samuel PollockSamuel   PollockCEO,   Brookfield Infrastructure Group L.P.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 13, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 3, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1327 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1172, K2025-1172.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-02559 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32336]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, January 9, 1995.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 2lst Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Proposals regarding conflicts of interest policies and 
financial disclosure forms for Federal Reserve Bank supervisory 
personnel. (This item was originally announced for a closed meeting 
on January 3, 1995.)
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: December 30, 1994.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 94-32336 Filed 12-30-94; 10:35 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Tyrone POINTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4419

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John M. Piecuch, as Chief Executive Officer of MMI Products, Inc. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Form 10-K report for the period ending January 3, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MMI Products, Inc. and will be retained by MMI Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated: April 2, 2004 | By:  /s/John M. Piecuch       
|-------------------- | ------------------------------
|                     | John M. Piecuch, President    
|                     | and Chief Executive Officer of
|                     | MMI Products, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Rafeh Hulays, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Netfone, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Netfone, Inc. for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Netfone, Inc.

Date: February 13, 2006

/s/ Rafeh Hulays                                              

Rafeh Hulays

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial 

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)