alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


         The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Royal Financial, Inc. on the
basis of such officers' knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the six months ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2005 (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  February 11, 2005


                                     /s/ Donald A. Moll
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:   Donald A. Moll
                                 Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  February 11, 2005


                                     /s/ Neil Brodzinski
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:   Neil Brodzinski
                                 Title:  Senior Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification
accompanies the Report and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of
this Report.
Glenn Martin MERCER, Appellant, v. Tricia Gail MERCER, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1925

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 41 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 41

  Allowing limited laptop computer access on the floor of the Senate 
   during impeachment proceedings against Donald John Trump, former 
                    President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2021

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Allowing limited laptop computer access on the floor of the Senate 
   during impeachment proceedings against Donald John Trump, former 
                    President of the United States.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. LAPTOP COMPUTER ACCESS.

    (a) In General.--During impeachment proceedings against Donald John 
Trump, former President of the United States, laptop computers may be 
used on the floor of the Senate Chamber only in accordance with the 
following:
            (1) Two laptop computers may be used by the impeachment 
        managers and their assistants.
            (2) Two laptop computers may be used by the counsel for the 
        former President of the United States and their assistants.
            (3) One laptop computer may be used by the President pro 
        tempore and the assistants of the President pro tempore.
            (4) Laptop computers available to employees and officers of 
        the Senate on the floor of the Senate Chamber during a regular 
        session of the Senate may be used by such employees and 
        officers as necessary.
    (b) Use of Laptop Computers in Other Rooms of the Senate Floor.--
During impeachment proceedings against Donald John Trump, former 
President of the United States, laptop computers may be used in other 
areas of the floor of the Senate (not including the Senate Chamber) by 
individuals described in paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a) 
and, as determined necessary, other employees and officers of the 
Senate.
    (c) Enforcement by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper.--The 
Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate shall take such actions 
as are necessary to enforce this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Alco Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bill Akrivos, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   October 10, 2008 /s/ Bill Akrivos Bill Akrivos, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED 

TERMINAL, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-07014-VC 

ORDER DENYING OAKLAND'S 

MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2

Re: Dkt. No. 197

Cappio's understanding of the meaning of the ordinance might have relevance if it 

informed the way the City enforced the ordinance, in a case where OBOT was challenging the 

particular manner in which the ordinance was being enforced. See Hoye v. City of Oakland, 653 

F.3d 835, 849-50 (9th Cir. 2011). But OBOT contends the ordinance is unlawful as written or 

simply may not be applied to OBOT. Therefore, the testimony from Cappio's deposition cited by 

OBOT in its summary judgment papers seems largely irrelevant. Nonetheless, the City's motion

in limine to exclude testimony from Cappio regarding her understanding of the ordinance is 

denied because this matter is better addressed at trial than on a blanket basis by way of motion in 

limine. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2018

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge
Carmus R. SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                               Certification

     The undersigned certifies for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as the chief
executive officer of Iron Star Development, Inc., ("Iron Star") that to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Iron Star on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operation of Iron Star.


Date: November 14, 2005

By: /s/ Wallace Boyack
     Wallace Boyack
     Chief Executive Officer
Christina PAYLAN, M.D., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Lyann GOUDIE, Esq., Goudie & Kohn, a Limited Liability Corporation, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1729

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
LOUISIANA MACHINERY RENTALS, L.L.C. and Louisiana Machinery Company, L.L.C. v. KEAN MILLER, L.L.P., Linda S. Akchin, Christopher J. Dicharry, Pamela R. Mascara and ABC Insurance Company

NO. 2019-C-0464

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.
SUCCESSION OF Hazel R. SAVOIE and Richard Michael Savoie v. John H. CARMOUCHE, et al.

NO. 2019-C-0548

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.
Exhibit 45

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-46 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bridge
Capital  Holdings  for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2006,  I,  Daniel P. Myers,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Bridge Capital Holdings, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  such Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in such Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Bridge Capital Holdings.



Date: August 3, 2006                       /s/ DANIEL P. MYERS
                                           _____________________________________

                                           Daniel P. Myers
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
CC HOLDINGS 2000, LLC and John T. Early, III Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1673

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SinoHub, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Henry T. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  March 30, 2012
By:
/s/ Henry T. CochranHenry T. CochranChief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Adi ARKEH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1435

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 2 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 3 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 4 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 5 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 6 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 7 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 8 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 9 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 10 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 11 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 12 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 13 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 14 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 15 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 16 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 17 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 18 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 19 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 20 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 21 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 22 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 23 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 24 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 25 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 26 of 27
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-3 Filed 06/18/18 Page 27 of 27
Subject: Re: Triton relay usage 

From: "Gokul Thirumalai" <gthirumalai@apple.com> 

Received(Date): Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:05:25 +0000 

To: "Patrick Gates" <pgates@apple.com> 

Cc: "Lionel Gentil" <lgentil@apple.com>,"Amol Pattekar" 

<pattekar@apple.com>,"Artie Nathan III" <anathan@apple.com> 

Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:05:25 +0000 

I'm not following why the relay bandwidth utilization would recover.

iOS6 was the biggest user of relay bandwidth. iOS7 uses a lot less. We broke all iOS6, 

and the only way to get FaceTime working again is to upgrade to iOS7 - which uses very 

little relay since it drops back down as soon as it can.

iReporter charts 

> On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Amol Pattekar <pattekar@apple.com> wrote:

> 

> 

> +Artie, who I believe is out until Monday. 

> 

> I would have expected the traffic to recover as some of these customers upgraded to 

newer builds. Not sure why it didn't recover. I do not recall any other change in April that 

would have reduced relay usage. 

> 

> I have also not heard any recent reports of customers complaining about FaceTime 

not working. 

> 

> Thanks,

> -Amol

> 

> Sent from my iPhone

> 

>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 8:01 PM, Patrick Gates <pgates@apple.com> wrote:

>> 

>> 

>> But it seems like it never recovered. Is FaceTime still broken for a large number of 

people? Like half?

>> 

>> - Patrick

>> 

>> 

>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 19:58, Amol Pattekar <pattekar@apple.com> wrote:>>> 

>>> 

>>> There was a cert that expired and several client builds were enforcing the expiry, so 

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00099786

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-19 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 2
FaceTime broke in all iOS except BrightonMaps, InnsbruckTaos and Sochi. It also broke 

in all major releases of OSX but all the SUs had a fix. This happened on April 15th. This 

substantially reduced relay utilization. 

>>> 

>>> For next year, we need to factor in additional relay usage for phone continuity. We 

will use more relay IPs. Bandwidth usage will likely not increase much. 

>>> 

>>> Thanks,

>>> -Amol

>>> 

>>> Sent from my iPhone

>>> 

>>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 7:45 PM, Patrick Gates <pgates@apple.com> wrote:

>>>> 

>>>> 

>>>> Hey guys -

>>>> 

>>>> I'm looking at the Akamai contract for the next year. I understand we did 

something in April around iOS 6 to reduce relay utilization. Does this ring a bell for any 

of you? Got details?

>>>> 

>>>> Thanks,

>>>> 

>>>> Patrick

>>>> 

>>>> 

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00099787

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-19 Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 2
Josef MOYER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0276

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 390 

Expressing appreciation for the State of Qatar’s efforts to assist the United 

States during Operation Allies Refuge. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. COONS, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. MARSHALL) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Relations 

MAY 24, 2022 

Reported by Mr. MENENDEZ, without amendment 

MAY 26, 2022 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing appreciation for the State of Qatar’s efforts to 

assist the United States during Operation Allies Refuge. 

Whereas thousands of United States citizens, lawful permanent residents, vulnerable Afghans, and their families 

sought refuge following the Afghan Taliban’s takeover of 

the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan; 

Whereas the State of Qatar played a critical role in assisting 

the United States in evacuating thousands of people from 

the rule of the Afghan Taliban regime; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

SRES 390 ATS 

Whereas Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar served as a central 

transportation hub for many evacuees desperately seeking 

to exit Afghanistan; and 

Whereas Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin stated, 

‘‘Qatar’s support for Operation Allies Refuge was indispensable to the safe transit of Americans and U.S. personnel, allies, partners and Afghans at special risk.’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) thanks the State of Qatar for their pivotal 

3 role and support of Operation Allies Refuge; and 

4 (2) appreciates the State of Qatar’s support to 

5 temporarily house thousands of evacuees until they 

6 are cleared for follow-on movement. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Kristen ALFORD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Michael ALFORD, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed. Denied.
>3523@25'(55(67,38/$7,2172(;7(1'

&/$66&(57$1'27+(5'($'/,1(6&,9,//5

$1'&$6(12&900&

























































81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

1257+(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

'$9,'%(5/$1*$%5$1'21(+5(60$1

&+$5/(6*$(7+0,&+$(/*21=$/(=

-2+1/$1*/,7=DQG&+5,6723+(5

3$/$&,2LQGLYLGXDOO\DQGRQEHKDOIRIDOO

VLPLODUO\VLWXDWHGFXUUHQWDQGIRUPHUHPSOR\HHV

   3ODLQWLIIV

Y

(48,/21(17(535,6(6//&GED6+(//2,/

352'8&7686&5,86/3&5,&$7$/<67

&203$1</3DQG6+(//3,3(/,1(

&203$1</3DQG'2(6WKURXJK

LQFOXVLYH

   

    'HIHQGDQWV

 &DVH1RFY00&

$VVLJQHGWR+RQ0D[LQH0&KHVQH\

>352326('@25'(55(67,38/$7,21

72(;7(1'&/$66&(57,),&$7,21

027,21$1'27+(5'($'/,1(6

Case 3:17-cv-00282-MMC Document 52 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 2


>3523@25'(55(67,38/$7,2172(;7(1'&/$66

&(57$1'27+(5'($'/,1(6&,9,//5$1'

&$6(12&900&

























































25'(5

7KH&RXUWKDYLQJFRQVLGHUHGWKHSDUWLHV¶6WLSXODWLRQWR([WHQG&ODVV&HUWLILFDWLRQ0RWLRQDQG

2WKHU'HDGOLQHVDQGILQGLQJJRRGFDXVHDSSHDULQJKHUHE\25'(56WKDW

 3ODLQWLIIVVKDOOILOHWKHLUPRWLRQIRUFODVVFHUWLILFDWLRQE\-XO\

 'HIHQGDQWVVKDOOILOHWKHLURSSRVLWLRQWR3ODLQWLIIV¶PRWLRQE\6HSWHPEHU

 3ODLQWLIIVVKDOOILOHWKHLUUHSO\E\2FWREHUDQG

 7KHKHDULQJRQ3ODLQWLIIV¶PRWLRQIRUFODVVFHUWLILFDWLRQVKDOOEHFRQWLQXHGWR1RYHPEHU

DWDP

7KH&RXUWIXUWKHURUGHUVWKDWWKH)XUWKHU&DVH0DQDJHPHQW&RQIHUHQFHVKDOOEHFRQWLQXHGIURP

1RYHPEHUWR-DQXDU\DWDP7KHSDUWLHVVKDOOILOHDMRLQWFDVHPDQDJHPHQW

FRQIHUHQFHVWDWHPHQWVHYHQGD\VEHIRUHWKH)XUWKHU&DVH0DQDJHPHQW&RQIHUHQFH

 ,7,66225'(5('

'DWHG      BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

       0D[LQH0&KHVQH\8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW-XGJH



 

April 20, 2018 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

0D[LQH0&KHVQH\8QLWHG6WDWHV 'LV

Case 3:17-cv-00282-MMC Document 52 Filed 04/20/18 Page 2 of 2
Antonio DOLL, Appellant, v. Julie JONES, Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3288

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Joseph KINDRED, DOC #Y11419, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3563

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 26 (Monday, February 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9242-9243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02480]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, February 13, 2025, 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: HYBRID MEETING: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th 
floor) and virtual.

STATUS: The February 13, 2025 Open Meeting has been canceled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Myles Martin, Deputy Press 
Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1221.
    Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at 
(202) 694-1040 or [email protected], at least 72 hours prior to the 
meeting date.

[[Page 9243]]

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-02480 Filed 2-6-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jonathan I. Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                       |  |        |  |                         
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|Date: February 4, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ JONATHAN I. SCHWARTZ
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Jonathan I. Schwartz    
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer