alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements No. 333-149888, No. 333-178533 and No. 333-186336 on Form S-8, of our report dated April 16, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements of China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd., itssubsidiaries, its variable interest entity (the “VIE”) and the VIE’s subsidiaries (collectively, the “Group”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, and thefinancial statement schedule of China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Group’s adoption of the authoritative guidance on the presentation ofcomprehensive income), and our report dated April 16, 2013, relating to the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd. for the yearended December 31, 2012. 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP 

Beijing, the People’s Republic of China 

April 16, 2013
#### Clark PEARSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Bradley E. POWELL, in official capacity as Regional Forester for Forest Services, Region V; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-15815.

D.C. No. CV-01-01929-WBS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 23, 2004.

*467Robert H. Oakley, U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Clark Pearson, Grass Valley, CA, pro se.

Robert H. Oakley, Todd S. Aagaard, U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, John F. Gisla, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Clark Pearson appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for Bradley E. Powell in Pearson’s action alleging that the Unites States Forest Service (“USFS”) violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) by initiating the Upper Slate Defensible Fuel Profile Zone Project (“Upper Slate Project”) without first issuing an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) and consulting with the Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review summary judgment de novo, *Wetlands Action Network v. United States Army Corps of Eng’rs,*222 F.3d 1105, 1114 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

The USFS’ decision to issue a “finding of no significant impact” (“FON-SI”), rather than prepare an EIS, for the Upper Slate Project was not arbitrary or capricious because the environmental assessment incorporated by reference other EISs that discussed the potential impact of construction in the area, *see Inland Empire Pub. Lands Council v. United States Forest Serv.,*88 F.3d 754, 757 (9th Cir. 1996), and the agency’s mitigation plans rendered adverse effects insignificant, *see Wetlands Action Network,*222 F.3d at 1121.

Contrary to Pearson’s contention, the USFS was not required to consult with the FWS, *see Pac. Rivers Council v. Thomas,*30 F.3d 1050, 1054 n. 8 (9th Cir. 1994), because the USFS prepared a biological assessment that determined initiation of the Upper Slate Project would *468have no effect on an endangered or threatened species, *see*50 C.F.R. § 402.12(k)(1). Accordingly, the USFS’ decision to not formally consult the FWS was not arbitrary, capricious, or a violation of the ESA. *See Envtl. Prot. Info. Ctr. v. Simpson Timber Co., 255*F.3d 1073, 1078 (9th Cir. 2001). The USFS’ informal consultation with the FWS was in accordance with the law because it did not commence its plans until it received a written concurrence from the FWS. 50 C.F.R. § 402.13(a); *see also Pac. Rivers Council,*30 F.3d at 1054 n. 8.

Pearson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Capital Support Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Capital Support
Agreement, is made as of the 26th day of January 2009, by and between Northern Trust Corporation (the “Support Provider”) and Northern
Trust Investments, N.A. (“NTI”), as trustee on behalf of the NTGI Collective Short Term Investment Fund (the “Fund”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties entered into a capital support agreement, dated as of February 21, 2008, amended such agreement on July 15, 2008 and subsequently amended and restated such agreement on September 29, 2008 (the
“Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein.

 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 
 2. Section 3(c)(iii) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 
 (iii) 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 6, 2009, or such later date as agreed upon by the Support Provider and NTI. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Capital
Support Agreement to be executed. 
  

			
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ William R. Dodds, Jr.

	Name:	 	William R. Dodds, Jr.
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	50 S. LaSalle St.
	Chicago, IL 60603
	Attn: William R. Dodds, Jr.
	
	NORTHERN TRUST INVESTMENTS, N.A., AS TRUSTEE OF THE NTGI COLLECTIVE SHORT TERM INVESTMENT FUND
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John L. Krieg

	Name:	 	John L. Krieg
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	50 S. LaSalle St.
	Chicago, IL 60603
	Attn: John L. Krieg
Item 6. (a)

                                   EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                   Statement Re Computation of Net Income Per Share
               (dollars in thousands, except for Net Income Per Share)

                                                                   Three Months Ended
                                                                        March 31,
                                                                   ------------------
                                                                     2000      1999
                                                                   --------  --------
<S>                                                                <C>       <C>
Net income                                                         $  6,360  $  5,465
Less:  Preferred stock dividend                                          42        42
                                                                   --------  --------
Net income applicable to common stock                              $  6,318  $  5,423

Weighted average common shares outstanding                          938,902   919,835

Net Income per common share-basic and diluted                      $   6.73  $   5.89
</TABLE>


                                    PAGE 14
<PAGE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stinger
Systems, Inc., for the period ended June 30, 2007;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Robert F. GruderRobert F. GruderChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1




                     PERCEPTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
               STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Quarter ended September 30      Six months ended September 30
                                --------------------------      -----------------------------
                                     1997          1996              1997          1996
                                     ----          ----              ----          ----
<S>                              <C>            <C>               <C>           <C>
NET INCOME (LOSS)                $  (28,050)    $  (95,808)       $   40,859    $ (357,053)
                                 ----------     ----------        ----------    ----------
                                 ----------     ----------        ----------    ----------
PRIMARY
  Average shares outstanding      4,469,287      3,863,732         4,469,287     3,863,732

  Net effect of dilutive stock
  options and warrants based 
  on the treasury stock method 
  using average market price          2,281        177,633             1,776       200,165
                                 ----------     ----------        ----------    ----------

TOTAL                             4,471,568      4,041,365         4,471,063     4,063,897
                                 ----------     ----------        ----------    ----------
                                 ----------     ----------        ----------    ----------


PRIMARY PER SHARE 
AMOUNT                           $     (.01)    $     (.03)       $      .01    $     (.09)
                                 ----------     ----------        ----------    ----------
                                 ----------     ----------        ----------    ----------




FULLY DILUTED                            **             **                **            **
</TABLE>


** Not required because dilution is less than 3%






           See notes to consolidated condensed financial statements
Exhibit 31



     RE:  Saxon Asset Securities Trust 2007-3, issued pursuant to the
          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1,
          2007, between Saxon Asset Securities Company, as depositor,
          Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., as servicer, and Deutsche
          Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

I, David Dill, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
this report on Form 10-K of Saxon Asset Securities Trust 2007-1
(the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by
this Report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;

     4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted
in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the pooling and servicing agreement in all material respects; and

     5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


Date: March 31, 2008

/s/ David Dill
David Dill
President
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the servicer)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Take notice that during the month of January 2025, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2024). Docket Nos.50LW 8me LLC
EG25-24-000Bluebird Solar LLC
EG25-25-000Seven Flags BESS, LLC
EG25-26-000Tierra Seca BESS, LLC
EG25-27-000Morgnec Road Solar, LLC
EG25-28-000Spring Grove Solar II, LLC
EG25-29-000Cascade Energy Storage II LLC
EG25-30-000Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC
EG25-31-000Richland Township Solar II, LLC
EG25-32-000BCD 2024 Fund 4 II Lessee, LLC
EG25-33-000Enbridge Solar (Orange Grove), LLC
EG25-34-000Hecate Energy Frye Solar, LLC
EG25-35-000EdSan 1C Solar, LLC
EG25-36-000Camino Solar, LLC
EG25-37-000Scatter Wash Energy Storage LLC
EG25-38-000Bluegrass Solar, LLC
EG25-39-000Burksol LLC
EG25-40-000Desert Willow Energy Storage, LLC
EG25-41-000Anole Energy Storage, LLC
EG25-42-000Wild Plains Wind Project, LLC
EG25-43-000Northwest Ohio Wind, LLC
EG25-44-000Bocanova Power LLC
EG25-46-000GB Arthur Kill Storage LLC
EG25-47-000Pier S Energy Storage LLC
EG25-48-000GC Project LP
FC25-1-000EniPower S.p.A
FC25-2-000
 Dated: February 5, 2025. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2025-02474 Filed 2-10-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10401]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281]


Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Virginia Electric and Power Company (the licensee) to 
withdraw its May 16, 1990, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 for the Surry Power 
Station, Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2, located in Surry County, Virginia.
    The proposed amendment would have referenced an analysis of the 
main steam line break scenarios in the Operating Licenses.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on July 5, 1991 
(56 FR 30778). However, by letter dated April 6, 1995, the licensee 
withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated May 16, 1990, and the licensee's letter 
dated April 6, 1995, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. The above documents are available for public inspection at 
the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room 
located at the Swem Library, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, 
Virginia 23185.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of April 1995.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bart C. Buckley,
Project Manager, Project Directorate II-I, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 95-10401 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cono Italiano, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex J. Kaminski, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
November 15, 2010




By:
              /s/ Alex J. KaminskiName:   
      Alex J. KaminskiTitle:     
      Principal Financial
Officer
Exhibit
32.2








Written
Statement of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002








The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of The Wilber Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date
hereof:





(a)
            the
      Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30,
      2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(b)
            information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.








/s/
      Joseph E. SutarisJoseph
      E. SutarisExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer,
      and SecretaryDate:  November 6,
      2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to The Wilber Corporation and will be retained
by The Wilber Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


49
Exhibit 71

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-72 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10293 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TRONNALD LOUIS DUNAWAY, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CR-98-2-T

-------------------- November 2, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent Tronnald Louis Dunaway moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dunaway has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Dunaway filed a notice of appeal five months after judgment. The 10-day limit for filing a notice of appeal in a criminal caseNo. 00-10293 -2- is "mandatory and jurisdictional." United States v. Coscarelli , 149 F.3d 342, 343 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc)(internal quotation and citation omitted); Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). This court’s briefing notice directed counsel to address whether the notice of appeal was timely. The FPD’s brief does not address the issue. It merely asserts that the notice of appeal was timely. We have examined counsel’s Anders brief and the record and have determined that the appeal raises no nonfrivolous issue. Therefore, we need not require additional briefing on the timeliness of the notice of appeal. See United States v. Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See id. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED as moot.