alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gray Creek Mining Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan J. Cox, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
21st day of July, 2008.


/s/ Alan J. Cox
---------------------------
Principal Financial Officer
Julian Christian MCINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3069

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of SOLAR ENERTECH CORP. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve Ye, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 15, 2009
              By:/s/ Steve
      YeSteve
      YeChief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 262 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 262

To authorize testimony, documents, and representation in United States 
                                v. Dodd.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2021

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony, documents, and representation in United States 
                                v. Dodd.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Dodd, Cr. No. 18-243, pending in the 
        United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony, and, if 
        necessary, documents from Laura Bowen, an employee of the Senate Post 
        Office, a department of the Office of the Senate Sergeant at Arms;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former employees of the 
        Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony or 
        documents relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Laura Bowen and any other current or former employee 
of the Senate Post Office from whom relevant evidence may be necessary 
are authorized to testify and produce documents in the case of United 
States v. Dodd, except concerning matters for which a privilege should 
be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent any 
current or former employee of the Senate Post Office in connection with 
the production of evidence authorized in section one of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT

    


    Between
Universal Infotainment Systems Corporation (“Employer”), and Mr. Nour Lawand
(“Employee”).

    


    THIS
AGREEMENT made as of this 18th day of
December, 2008 (the “Agreement”), by and between Universal Infotainment Systems
Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“Employer,” or “The Company”), and Mr. Nour
Lawand (“Employee”) is an amendment to the Employment Agreement dated the 2nd day of
May, 2008.

    


    The
following is mutually agreed upon by the Employer and the Employee on this
18th
day of December, 2008:

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              Deferment
      of Effective Date of Employment
Agreement

            


    

    The Employer and the
Employee mutually agree to defer the effective date of cash compensation,
but not stock compensation which shall be paid the date the Employment Agreement
was signed, under the Employment Agreement dated the 2nd day of
May, 2008. Cash compensation will be deferred until such time at which The
Company is a publically traded entity and has secured a financial threshold of
no less than $4,000,000 in available financial capital.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of this 18th day of
December, 2008.

    


    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    	
                            Employer

                          
	
                            Universal
      Infotainment Systems Corporation

                          
	 
      
	 
      
	
                            By:

                          	/s/ Emanuel
      G. Pavlopoulos
	
                            Emanuel
      G. Pavlopoulos

                          
	
                            Chairman

                          
	 
      
	 
      
	
                            Employee

                          
	 
      
	     /s/
      Nour Lawand
	
                            Mr.
      Nour Lawand

                          
	
                            Chief
      Operating
Officer

                          


                  

                

              

            

          

        

      

    

    


    
      	
              Page 1 of
      1

            	
              Amendment
      to Employment Agreement

            	
              Nour
      Lawand
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12653]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Line, Form, Qi: Calligraphic Art from the Fondation INK” at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 11, 2015.                

Rafik K. Mansour,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2025-02487 Filed 2-10-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this filing of AOB Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report), Nelson Liao, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Nelson Liao

Chief Financial Officer

Date: September 29, 2006
Case 5:17-mj-70098-MAG Document 8 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 1
Britta Swanson GEAR, Appellant, v. Brian Leigh GEAR, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1776

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.1


              Description of ProAssurance Corporation's Executive
                       Supplemental Life Insurance Plan

         During the second quarter, The Medical Assurance Company, Inc.
("Medical Assurance") and ProNational Company ("ProNational") purchased business
owned life insurance from several life insurance companies for a lump sum
premium of $50 Million (the "BOLI Contracts"). The BOLI Contracts were
purchased in connection with the implementation of a Executive Supplemental
Life Insurance Plan (the "Executive Insurance Plan") for the benefit of certain
designated management level employees of ProAssurance Corporation and its
subsidiaries (collectively the "Company"), including without limitation, all of
the executive officers of ProAssurance Corporation.

         The Executive Insurance Plan provides each participant a death benefit
of $50,000 payable to the participant's designated beneficiary on his or her
death. To be eligible to participate in the Executive Insurance Plan, an
employee of the Company must be selected by the administrator of the plan. A
selected employee must then execute (i) a written election to participate,
which includes the employee's consent to the purchase of employer owned life
insurance on the life of the employee, and (ii) a written designation of the
participant's beneficiary under the Executive Insurance Plan. The death benefit
is payable to a participant's beneficiary so long as the Executive Insurance
Plan remains in effect whether or not participant remains in the employ of the
Company. The Company may terminate the Executive Insurance Plan at any time in
which event there is no further obligation to pay death benefits under the
plan.

         The BOLI Contracts were purchased by Medical Assurance and ProNational
as employers of substantially all of the employees of the Company, and they
will be entitled to receive death benefits payable on the BOLI Contracts on the
death of participants under the Executive Insurance Plan. They will use the
benefits paid under the BOLI Contracts to pay the death benefits to the
participants' beneficiaries as required under the Executive Insurance Plan. The
death benefits payable to participants under the Executive Insurance Plan
represent approximately one percent of the total estimated death benefits under
the BOLI Contracts, although such percentage may vary as to individual
participants because the total death benefits under the BOLI Contract are based
on a multiple of each participant's salary. ProAssurance Corporation as the
parent of Medical Assurance and ProNational acted as the plan administrator and
selected the initial participants in the Executive Insurance Plan. ProAssurance
Corporation intends to incorporate the Executive Insurance Plan in a master
welfare benefit plan for employees of the Company to be administered by its
subsidiary, ProAssurance Group Service Corporation.
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matrix Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  December  31,  2005 as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  March 14, 2006


/s/ Lori Bolton
---------------------------------------
Lori Bolton, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Clark YATES, Appellant, v. David MORGAN, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Escambia County, Florida; and Denise Elizabeth Ives, individually, Appellees.

No. 1D18-1435

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
-1- 

STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Mark R. Vermeulen [CSBN 115381] 

Law Office of Mark R. Vermeulen 

755 Florida Street #4 

San Francisco, CA 94110.2044 

Phone: 415.824.7533 

Fax: 415.824.4833 

vermeulen@mindspring.com 

Attorney for Defendant 

WEN BING LEI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

WEN BING LEI, 

 Defendant. 

No. 15-cr-71548-SK 

STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING AND TO EXCLUDE 

TIME 

Date: January 3, 2017 

Time: 9:30 a.m. 

This matter is set for before this Court on January 3, 2017 for a preliminary hearing or 

indictment. The parties request that this matter be continued January 31, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. to allow the 

parties additional time to discuss whether they can reach a pre-indictment resolution of the case. The 

parties request that the Court exclude time between January 3, 2017 and January 31, 2017 for effective 

preparation of defense counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The extension is not sought for delay, and the parties agree that 

the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the 

defendant in a speedy trial. 

Dated: December 19, 2016 Brian J. Stretch 

United States Attorney 

/S/ 

William Frentzen 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 3:17-cr-00044-VC Document 32 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: December 19, 2016 /S/ 

Mark R. Vermeulen 

Attorney for Defendant 

WEN BING LEI 

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is continued to January 31, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. for 

preliminary hearing or indictment. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time between January 3, 2017 and January 31, 2017 is 

excluded pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act for effective preparation of defense counsel, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). Based 

upon the parties’ stipulation, the Court finds that the extension is not sought for delay, and the ends of 

justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in 

a speedy trial. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December __, 2016 _____________________________ 

Maria-Elena James 

United States Magistrate Judge 

19

Case 3:17-cr-00044-VC Document 32 Filed 12/19/16 Page 2 of 2
Charley Paul RAWLS, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1414

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7294

MICHAEL O. BILLINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD W. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-568) Submitted: June 30, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Gerald Thomas Zerkin, GERALD T. ZERKIN & ASSOCIATES, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael O. Billington seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Billington v. Angelone , No. CA-95- 568 (E.D. Va. Jan. 4 and July 26, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We also deny Billington’s motion for a certificate of appealability.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the Managing Owner of World Monitor Trust III
(the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley  
|Maureen D. Howley      
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2005      



E-6
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, the Form 10-K/A of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: July 8, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Roger A. May             
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Roger A. May                 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Manager                      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)