Molly C. Dwyer

Clerk of Court 

Office of the Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 

Post Office Box 193939

San Francisco, California 94119-3939

415-355-8000

April 01, 2019

No.: 19-15607

D.C. No.: 3:17-cv-00635-CRB

Short Title: CAPEEM, et al v. Tom Torlakson, et al

Dear Appellant/Counsel

A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of 

Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must 

indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with 

this court regarding this case. 

Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an 

order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court 

reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court.

The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal 

have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable 

FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the 

appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic 

dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1.

Case 3:17-cv-00635-CRB Document 240 Filed 04/11/19 Page 1 of 4 Case: 19-15607, 04/01/2019, ID: 11248626, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

APR 01 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CALIFORNIA PARENTS FOR THE 

EQUALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL 

MATERIALS; ARVIND RAGHAVAN, 

individually and as parent and next 

friend of M.R. and N.R.; 

VISHNUKUMAR THUMATI, 

individually and as parent and next 

friend of P.T. and N.T.; SHAILESH 

SHILWANT, individually and as parent 

and next friend of P.S. and P.S.S., 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

TOM TORLAKSON, in his official 

capacity as State Superintendent of 

Public Instruction and Director of 

Education for the California Department 

of Education; TOM ADAMS, in his 

official capacity as Deputy 

Superintendent of the Instruction and 

Learning Support Branch of the 

California Department of Education; 

STEPHANIE GREGSON, in her official 

capacity as Director of the Curriculum 

Frameworks and Instructional Resources 

Division of the California Department of 

Education; MICHAEL KIRST; ILENE 

STRAUS; SUE BURR; BRUCE 

HOLADAY; FELIZA I. ORTIZLICON; PATRICIA ANN RUCKER; 

No. 19-15607

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00635-CRB

U.S. District Court for Northern 

California, San Francisco

TIME SCHEDULE ORDER

Case 3:17-cv-00635-CRB Document 240 Filed 04/11/19 Page 2 of 4 Case: 19-15607, 04/01/2019, ID: 11248626, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 2 of 4
NICOLASA SANDOVAL; TING L. 

SUN; TRISH BOYD WILLIAMS, each 

in their official capacity as a member of 

the California State Board of Education; 

MYONG LEIGH, in his official 

capacity as Interim Superintendent of 

the San Francisco Unified School 

District; SHAMANN WALTON; 

HYDRA MENDOZA-MCDONNELL; 

STEVON COOK; MATT HANEY; 

EMILY M. MURASE; RACHEL 

NORTON; MARK SANCHEZ, each in 

their official capacity as a member of 

the San Francisco Unified School 

District; RICK SCHMITT, in his official 

capacity as Superintendent of the San 

Ramon Valley Unified School District; 

MARK JEWETT; KEN MINTZ; 

RACHEL HURD; DENISE 

JENNISON; GREG MARVEL, each in 

their official capacity as a member of 

the San Ramon Valley Unified School 

District Board of Education; WENDY 

GUDALEWICZ, in her official capacity 

as Superintendent of the Cupertino 

Union School District; ANJALI 

KAUSAR; LIANG CHAO; KRISTEN 

LYN; SOMA MCCANDLESS; 

PHYLLIS VOGEL, each in their official 

capacity as a member of the Cupertino 

Union School District Board of 

Education; CHERYL JORDAN, in her 

official capacity as Superintendent of 

the Milpitas Unified School District; 

DANIEL BOBAY; DANNY LAU; 

CHRIS NORWOOD; HON LIEN; 

ROBERT JUNG, each in their official 

capacity as a member of the Milpitas 

Unified School District Board of 

Education, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Case 3:17-cv-00635-CRB Document 240 Filed 04/11/19 Page 3 of 4 Case: 19-15607, 04/01/2019, ID: 11248626, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 3 of 4
The parties shall meet the following time schedule.

If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported 

hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply.

Mon., April 8, 2019 Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration for 

Appellate ECF is confirmed after this date, the 

Mediation Questionnaire is due within one day of 

receiving the email from PACER confirming your 

registration.

Mon., April 29, 2019 Transcript shall be ordered.

Tue., May 28, 2019 Transcript shall be filed by court reporter.

Mon., July 8, 2019 Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record 

shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 

9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

Tue., August 6, 2019 Appellees' answering brief and excerpts of record 

shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 

9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within 21 days of 

service of the appellees' brief, pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in 

automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. 

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: John Brendan Sigel

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 3:17-cv-00635-CRB Document 240 Filed 04/11/19 Page 4 of 4 Case: 19-15607, 04/01/2019, ID: 11248626, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 4 of 4