alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

*E-FILED: February 3, 2012*

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES ex rel. DONNA M.

McLEAN and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ex rel DONNA M. McLEAN,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, THE

DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND

CHILDREN’S SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA

COUNTY, KENNETH BORELLI,

LAWRENCE GALLEGOS, EPIFANIO (“J.R.”)

REYNA, TANYA BEYERS, DR. DEE

SCHAFFER, DR. TOMMIJEAN THOMAS,

DR. RICHARD PERILLO and DOES 1-100,

Defendants. /

No. C05-01962 HRL

ORDER VACATING MOTION

HEARING

Relator’s “Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs” (Dkt. No. 406) is deemed suitable

for determination without oral argument. The February 7, 2012 hearing is vacated. Civ. L.R. 7-

1(b).

Dated: February 3, 2012

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:05-cv-01962-HRL Document 409 Filed 02/03/12 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

5:05-cv-01962-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Gordon Wayne Renneisen grenneisen@cornerlaw.com, pprill@cornerlaw.com

Jeremy L. Friedman jlfried@comcast.net

Melissa R. Kiniyalocts melissa.kiniyalocts@cco.co.scl.ca.us,

marylou.gonzales@cco.sccgov.org

Sara McLean sara.mclean@usdoj.gov

Sara Winslow sara.winslow@usdoj.gov, kathy.terry@usdoj.gov

Stephen H. Schmid stephen.schmid@cco.co.santa-clara.ca.us,

marylou.gonzales@cco.sccgov.org

William C Dresser loofwcd@aol.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not

registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Case 5:05-cv-01962-HRL Document 409 Filed 02/03/12 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001040765
<NAME>                        Vornado Realty L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-12-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         167,808
<SECURITIES>                                    77,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,044
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,315,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                 226,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,425,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,051,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    282,758
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,920,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,425,779
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               509,860
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                168,386
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            168,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   131,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
        




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Brian W. Sturgell, Chief Executive Officer of Novelis Inc. (“Novelis”), certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Novelis;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006        /s/ Brian W. Sturgell     Brian W. Sturgell    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cono Italiano, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex J. Kaminski, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 20, 2011








By:
/s/ Alex J. KaminskiName:    Alex J. KaminskiTitle:      Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 34.1

[Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP]







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
Protective Life Insurance Company:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria that Protective Life Insurance Company complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Funding Agreement Registered Notes Platform (the Platform), as of December 31, 2007 and for the year then ended, excluding (i) the criteria which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the Platform and (ii) the servicing activities that are applicable to the Platform but are excluded from the scope of management's assertion and are not reported on herein, as indicated in Appendix A of Management's Assertion on Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria.  Appendix B to management's assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.  Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Birmingham, Alabama
March 14, 2008
#### Jose RODRIGUEZ-SANDOVAL, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70144.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 17, 2004.

Jose Rodriguez-Sandoval, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wernery, Esq., Douglas E. Ginsburg, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

**This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

We lack jurisdiction over this petition for review because Rodriguez-Sandoval challenges only the Board of Immigration Appeals’ discretionary determination that he failed to establish that his children, if removed to Mexico, would suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(B); *Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003) (Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that an alien failed to satisfy the extreme and unusual hardship requirement for cancellation of removal).

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), Rodriguez-Sandoval’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the stay of removal was granted, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, nunc pro tunc, to the filing of the motion for stay of removal and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

*540PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Quentin JOYNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1714

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Laural
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended May 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert MacKay,
Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date:
August 5, 2008


ROBERT
MACKAY


Robert
MacKay


Chief
Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director














-1-
Opinion issued August 2 , 201 2 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

NO. 01
B 12
B 00330
B CV

SHANTELE ENGLISH , Appellant

V. TIDEWATER FINANCE CO MPANY , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1005013



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Shantele English, has neither paid the required filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
.2

P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must
pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel o n Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). Appellant was notified on April 9, 2012 that this appeal was subject to dismissal if she did not pay the fee by April 19, 2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant was again notified on June 11, 2012 that this appeal was subject to dismissal if she did not pay the fee by June 21,
2012. After being notified again that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See id. Appellant has also neither established indigence, nor paid , or made arrangements to pay , the fee for preparing the clerk = s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of3

appeal for want of prosecution if no clerk ’ s record filed due to appellant ’ s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3 (b) (allowing involuntary dismissal for want of prosecution )

. We dismiss the ap peal f or want of prosecution. We dismiss a ll pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes

.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-69 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
Jermaine Lee WALKER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0173

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER                  
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jarrett F. Bousquet, the Principal Executive Officer of
Yaterra Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                   

| | By:    | /s/ Jarrett F. Bousquet    
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | JARRETT F. BOUSQUET        
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Principal Executive Officer
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | December 14, 2009          
| |        |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT: 10.20


                                FOURTH AMENDMENT
                             TO THE CHOICEPOINT INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


         THIS AMENDMENT to the ChoicePoint Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the
"Plan") is made and entered into by ChoicePoint Inc. (the "Company") as of the
31st day of December, 2003;

         WHEREAS, the Company has previously adopted the Plan, which was
originally effective July 30, 1997, and has amended the Plan on three prior
instances; and,

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.5 of the Plan, the Management
Compensation & Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company did,
by resolution duly adopted, amend the Plan as reflected herein, and the Company
wishes to memorialize said amendment formally;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                                       1.

         Section 9.1(d) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting said section
in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

         "(d) Nature of Payment. Distributions of Excess Matching Contribution
         Accounts, Excess Transition Benefit Plan Accounts, Excess
         Profit-Sharing Contributions Accounts (for post-2001 Plan Years) and
         SERP Accounts shall be made in Company stock, except that the portion
         of any contribution to a SERP Account made for 2003 which represents a
         percentage of compensation for a Participant which is greater than the
         percentage contributed for said Participant for 2002 shall be
         distributed in cash, and distributions of all other Accounts shall be
         made in cash."



<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Fourth Amendment to be
executed as of the date and year first above written.

                                          CHOICEPOINT INC.



                                          By:     /s/ John H. Karr
                                             --------------------------------
                                          Title:  V. P. Compensation
                                                  ---------------------------

Attest:

/s/ Mary M. Young
--------------------------
Title: Assistant Secretary