alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Evaluating Fitness for 

Use

Bob Sivinski

Statistical and Science Policy

Office of Management and Budget

This presentation represents only the opinions of the 

presenter, and does not represent official OMB positions 

or Guidance. 1
Fitness for Use Policies

There’s a loミgstaミdiミg fraマe┘ork for eミsuriミg fitミess for purpose iミ 

federal information dissemination:

Administrative Procedures Act

Executive Order 12866

Information Quality Act

Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act

Paperwork Reduction Act

2
Fitness Framework

Survey Research Center. (2016). Guidelines for Best Practice in Cross-Cultural Surveys. 

Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan 3
Fitness Framework

Survey Research Center. (2016). Guidelines for Best Practice in Cross-Cultural Surveys. 

Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan 4
Evaluating Fitness: Tools

FCSM – Data Quality Assessment Tool for Admin Data

1. Discovery

2. Initial Acquisition

3. Repeated Acquisition

5
Use Framework

Highly Influential 

Official Statistic 

(Disseminated)

Internal Use

6
Paperwork Reduction Act

さeミsure the greatest possible public benefit from and maximize the 

utility of information created, collected, maintained, used, shared and 

disseminated by or for the Federal Go┗erミマeミtざ

Fitness Intended 

Use

7
Communication

External review of plans and 

methods

Documentation: 

methodology/data/metadata

Post-dissemination review, 

errata, quality improvement

8
Communication Examples

UK Statistics Authority – Types of Official Statistics

• National Statistics

• Experimental Statistics

• Not assessed or de-designated

US Census Bureau – Experimental Data Products

• Provide value in absence of official products

• Allow feedback on quality and usefulness

• Path towards new official products

• Always identify them and include methodology with their release

9
The Fitness Feedback Loop

Use Fitness

10
# L_2018022EN.01003401.xml

| 26.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 22/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 22/34

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2018/132

of 25 January 2018

implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 of 31 July 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, and repealing Decision 2011/137/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333.

| (2) | On 18 January 2018, the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 (2011) renewed and amended the listing of a vessel subject to restrictive measures. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 18 January 2018, the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 (2011) renewed and amended the listing of a vessel subject to restrictive measures.

| (3) | Annex V to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex V to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex V to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 January 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. KRALEVA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.

1

---

ANNEX

In section B (Entities) of Annex V to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333, entry 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1.   Name: CAPRICORN

A.k.a.: na F.k.a.: na Address: na Listed on:
  21 July 2017 (amended on 20 October 2017, 27 November 2017, and 18 January 2018)

Additional information

IMO: 8900878. Listed pursuant to paragraphs 10 (a) and 10 (b) of Resolution 2146 (2014), as extended and modified by paragraph 2 of Resolution 2362 (2017) (prohibition to load, transport or discharge; prohibition to enter ports). Pursuant to paragraph 11 of Resolution 2146, this designation was renewed by the Committee on 18 January 2018 and is valid until 17 April 2018, unless terminated earlier by the Committee pursuant to paragraph 12 of Resolution 2146. Flag State: unknown. As of 21 September 2017, the vessel was located in international waters off the United Arab Emirates.’.

---
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL CREDIT SERVICE; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981)

SJSagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)

EGale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (SBN 268542)

JAngelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste 100

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 297-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff Tanesha Collazo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TANESHA COLLAZO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 4:17-cv-00416-YGR

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL 

CREDIT SERVICE; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Tanesha Collazo and defendant

Professional Credit Service that Professional Credit Service be dismissed from this action with

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that each party shall 

bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

//

//

//

//

//

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 48 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL CREDIT SERVICE; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: May 30, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot Gale

Elliot Gale

Attorney for Plaintiff Tanesha Collazo

DATED: May 30, 2017 Professional Credit Service

By: /s/ Hannah Rachel Horsfall

Hannah Rachel Horsfall

Attorney for Defendant Professional Credit 

Service

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Hannah Rachel Horsfall has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Professional Credit Service is dismissed with 

prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 48 Filed 05/31/17 Page 2 of 2
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00105

- CV
New LifeCare Hospitals of South Texas, L.L.C.

v. RCBS, L.P.

On a ppeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 3353

- 17

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, havin g considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellee

. We fur ther order this decision certified below for observance. November 29 , 2018
Exhibit 73

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-74 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20683-20684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10325]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Country Bank Shares, Inc., et al.; Formations of; Acquisitions 
by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than May 22, 1995.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Country Bank Shares, Inc., Milford, Nebraska; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of The Bank of Wilber, Wilber, 
Nebraska. [[Page 20684]] 
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105:
    1. California Bancshares, Inc., San Ramon, California; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of First Community Bankshares, Inc., 
Castro Valley, California, and thereby indirectly acquire Centennial 
Bank, Castro Valley, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 21, 
1995.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 95-10325 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32249]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER94-466-000]


Moreau Manufacturing Corporation; Notice of Filing

December 21, 1994.
    Take notice that on December 19, 1994, Moreau Manufacturing 
Corporation tendered for filing a letter requesting that the Commission 
accept it for filing subject to resolution of issues currently being 
reviewed by the Commission in Docket No. ER94-465-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before January 4, 1995. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-32249 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Antonio FIDDEMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-1212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 27, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00443

- CR

Anthony Ornelas APOLINAR

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5525

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 27, 2018.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Nadezda Maximova,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of  Bonfire Productions,  Inc.,  for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2008 fully complies with  the  requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all  material  respects  the
financial condition and results of operations of Bonfire Productions, Inc.

Date:  July 16, 2008

                                      /s/ Nadezda Maximova
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Nadezda Maximova
                                      Secretary, Treasurer and Director
                                     (Principal Financial Officer and
                                      Principal Accounting Officer)
# LI2018054EN.01000601.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 54/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 54/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2018/283

of 26 February 2018

amending Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 concerning restrictive measures against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 of 20 September 2016 concerning restrictive measures against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them and repealing Common Position 2002/402/CFSP (1),

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 20 September 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 20 September 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693.

| (2) | In view of the continued threat posed by ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them, one person should be added to the list of persons, groups, undertakings and entities in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the continued threat posed by ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them, one person should be added to the list of persons, groups, undertakings and entities in the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693.

| (3) | Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 February 2018.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 25.

1

---

ANNEX

The following is added to the Annex to Decision (CFSP) 2016/1693:

‘A.   Persons

| 1. | Fabien CLAIN (a.k.a. Omar); date of birth: 30 January 1978; place of birth: Toulouse (France); Nationality: French; Passport number No 06AP104665 issued on 16.1.2006 (expired); national identity card number: No 150161100206 issued on 8.1.2015 (valid until 7.1.2030).’. |
| --- | --- |

1.

---
1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

REQUEST TO ATTEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO. CV-01-20985 JF (RS) 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

Daniel J. Furniss (State Bar No. 073531) 

Anne M. Rogaski (State Bar No. 184754) amrogaski@townsend.com 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: 650-326-2400 

Facsimile: 650-326-2422 

MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO P.C. 

David Barmak 

12010 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 900 

Reston, Virginia 20190 

Telephone: 703-464-4800 

Facsimile: 703-464-4895 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DIGEX, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JULIE WHITE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DIGEX, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

 Case No. CV-01-20985 JF (RS) 

REQUEST TO ATTEND CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY 

TELEPHONE AND ORDER 

THEREON 

Date: July 28, 2006 

Time: 10:30 a.m. 

Judge: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

Dept: 3, 5th Floor 

 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-10(a), Defendant DIGEX, INC. (“DIGEX”), requests permission to 

participate in the Case Management Conference scheduled for July 28, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. by 

telephone. 

 DIGEX will be represented at the Case Management Conference by Anne M. Rogaski, whose 

direct telephone number is 650-463-7601. Counsel will make arrangements with the Court’s 

teleconference services for the telephonic appearance. 

**E-filed 7/14/06**

Case 5:01-cv-20985-JF Document 97 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 2
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

REQUEST TO ATTEND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE AND ORDER THEREON 2 

CASE NO.CV-01-20985 JF (RS) 

DATED: July 12, 2006 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

By:/s/ Anne M. Rogaski 

Daniel J. Furniss 

Anne M. Rogaski 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DIGEX, INC. 

ORDER

 Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that DIGEX, INC. may appear at 

the Case Management Conference, set for July 28, 2006, by telephone. 

Date: 

 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Court Judge 

60817986 v1 

7/14/06

Case 5:01-cv-20985-JF Document 97 Filed 07/14/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Pg
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4b, <o
OAKLAND DIVISION Non0.8) Yo)
"soy, Oy
United States of America, ) Case No. QR, [It - 000SD TBSS, >
) pore

Plaintiff; ) STIPULATED ORDEREXCLUDING ~ “ap

) TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT ow
v. MARCEL RUE) )
)
Defendant. )

For the reason stated by the parties on the record on 4 \26 , 2017, the Court excludes time under the Speedy
Trial Act from 4 (36 2017, to il 2017 and finds that the ends of justice served by the
continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A). The Court makes this finding and bases this continuance on the following factors:

Failure to grant a continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(D.

The case is so unusual or so complex, due to [circle applicable reasons] the number of
defendants, the nature of the prosecution, or the existence of novel questions of fact

or law, that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or the trial
itself within the time limits established by this section. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).

Failure to grant a continuance would deny the defendant reasonable time to obtain counsel,
taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel,
given counsel's other scheduled case commitments, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

V Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

For the reasons stated on the record, it is further ordered that time is excluded under 18 U.S.C. §
3161(b) and waived with the consent of the defendant under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
5.1(c) and (d).

For the reasons stated on the record, it is further ordered that time is excluded under 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(1)(E)(F) for delay resulting from removal/transport of the defendant to another district.

IT IS SO ORDERED. A

DATED: )_, 2017

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATED: == Auitet b>

Attorney for Defendant Assistant United States Attorney
Gloria GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Assignee of Citibank, N.A./Sears Mastercard, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-4545

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Peter MEIZIES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1288

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Wells Fargo Logo
                
                Wells Fargo Bank,
      NADocument
      Custody1015
      - 10th Avenue SEMinneapolis,
      MN 55014
 ASSESSMENT
OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
 Corporate
Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgatedby the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regards to the servicing platformas of and for the period
as follows:
 Platform:  Publicly-issued
(i.e.,transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial
mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006for which the Company
provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions
issued by any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").
 Applicable Servicing
Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by
the Company with respect to the Platform (the ''Applicable Servicing
Criteria").  Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.
 Period: As of and for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").
 With
respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:
 1.  The
Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.
 2.  The
Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, in
performing this assessment,
the Company used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange
Commission in paragraph (d) of
Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
 3.  Based on
suchassessment, as
of and for the Period, the Company has complied, in all material respects with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.
 KPMGLLP, a registeredpublic accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report withrespect to the Company's
assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.
 WELLS
      FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:
      /s/ Shari L.
    GillundIts:
      Senior Vice PresidentDated:
      February 29, 2008