alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gerold Lee DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack SHERMAN, Jr.; S. Arthur Spiegel; Leonard Green, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-3492.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 3, 2004.

Gerold Lee Davis, #89907-071, Jesup, GA, pro se.

Donetta D. Wiethe, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before SUHRHEINRICH, BATCHELDER, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

Gerold Lee Davis appeals a district court order that imposed the $105 appellate filing fee against Davis in his appeal taken from an earlier district court judgment that dismissed his civil rights complaint. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Davis filed his complaint in the district court alleging that the three named defendants, a United States Magistrate Judge, a United States District Court Judge, and the Clerk of this court, somehow deprived him of his constitutional rights in earlier civil litigation. The district court dismissed Davis’s complaint as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Davis filed a timely notice of appeal taken from the district court’s judgment, and the appeal was docketed in this court as Case No. OS-3231. The district court then entered its order assessing the appellate filing fee. Davis filed a timely notice of appeal taken from the district court’s order assessing the appellate filing fee. The same day, this court dismissed Davis’s appeal in Case No. 03-3231 for want of prosecution. This court then denied Davis pauper status in this case because an appeal would be frivolous, and Davis has now paid the appellate filing fee.

Upon consideration, the district court’s order is affirmed because Davis has waived appellate review of the district court’s order by fading to address the order in his brief on appeal. *See Indeck Energy Servs., Inc. v. Consumers Energy Co.,*250 F.3d 972, 979 (6th Cir.2000); *Robinson v. Jones,*142 F.3d 905, 906 (6th Cir.1998). Nonetheless, it is noted that the district court properly issued a defi*974ciency order after Davis failed to move for pauper status or pay the appellate filing fee, then properly assessed the filing fee when Davis failed to comply with the deficiency order by either moving for pauper status or paying the filing fee. *See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,*114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir.1997). Accordingly, Davis’s appeal is meritless in any event.

For the foregoing reasons, the district court’s order is affirmed. *See*Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Stanley R. PALOWSKY, III, Individually, and on Behalf of Alternative Environmental Solutions, Inc. v. Allyson CAMPBELL, et al.

NO. 2018-C-1115

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

CLARK, J., recused.
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. § 1350,                            
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl
Ritter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Carl Ritter              
| | -----------------------------
| | Carl Ritter                  
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (principal executive officer)
| | September 10, 2009           

---
EXHIBIT 11

                            U.S.B. HOLDING CO., INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

             FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2001


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                       THREE MONTHS            NINE MONTHS
                                                                          ENDED                    ENDED
                                                                       Sept. 30, 2001         Sept. 30, 2001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>                     <C>
NUMERATOR:
        Net income                                                     $        5,156          $       15,394
        Less preferred stock dividends                                             --                      11
                                                                       -----------------------------------------
        Net income for basic and diluted earnings
          per common share - net income available
          to common stockholders                                       $        5,156          $       15,383
                                                                       =========================================
DENOMINATOR:
        Denominator for basic earnings per common
           share - weighted average shares                                 16,712,165              16,636,233

        Effects of dilutive securities:
          Director and employee stock options                                 403,009                 384,602
          Restricted stock not vested                                             387                   2,521
                                                                       -----------------------------------------
        Total effects of dilutive securities                                  403,396                 387,123
                                                                       -----------------------------------------

        Denominator for diluted earnings per common
           share - adjusted weighted average shares                        17,115,561              17,023,356
                                                                       =========================================
        Basic earnings per common share                                $         0.31          $         0.92
                                                                       =========================================
        Diluted earnings per common share                              $         0.30                    0.90
                                                                       =========================================



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael E. Lehman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 29, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                  |  |        |  |                        
|----------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 7, 2009 |  | By:    |  | /s/ MICHAEL E. LEHMAN  
|                  |  | Name:  |  | Michael E. Lehman      
|                  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Alesandro OLIVO-LIRIANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1401

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                         656,765
<SECURITIES>                                   357,098
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,904,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                   228,205
<INVENTORY>                                    476,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,754,565
<PP&E>                                       2,040,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                 901,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,171,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,809,846
<BONDS>                                         40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           288
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,223,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,171,245  
<SALES>                                      2,360,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,360,928
<CGS>                                        1,101,636
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,027,012 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                346,282
<INCOME-TAX>                                   114,273
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            232,009
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   232,009
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as created by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, LukasBraunschweiler, Chief Executive Officer of Dionex Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, and towhich this Certification is attached (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     By: /s/ Lukas Braunschweiler       Name: Lukas Braunschweiler  Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  Dated: November 9, 2005
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |     |                                                                             
|--------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     |                                                                             
|Date:  March 31, 2009 | By: | /s/ ROBERT M. BROWN                                                         
|                      |     | Robert M. Brown
Chief Financial Officer
Gulfstream International Group, Inc.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-4 No. 333-165793, Form S-8 Nos. 333-152646 and 333-162421 and the Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 on Form S-3 No. 333-144447) of Stream Global Services, Inc. of our reportdated March 2, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Stream Global Services, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 2, 2011
Darren L. FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2359

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20281-20282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10082]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20282]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Bureau of Investigation


Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Advisory Policy 
Board

    The Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Advisory Policy 
Board will meet on June 7-8, 1995, from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m., at the 
Sheraton Fisherman's Wharf Hotel, 2500 Mason Street, San Francisco, 
California, telephone 415-362-5500, to formulate recommendations to the 
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on the security, 
policy, and operation of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), 
NCIC 2000, the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System 
(IAFIS), and the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) and National Incident 
Based Reporting System (NIBRS) programs.
    The topics to be discussed will include the progress of the NCIC 
2000 and IAFIS projects, status of the Brady Handgun Violence 
Prevention Act, and other topics related to the management of the FBI's 
criminal history information systems.
    The meeting will be open to the public on a first-come, first-
seated basis. Any member of the public may file a written statement 
concerning the FBI CJIS Division programs or related matters with the 
Board, before or after. Anyone wishing to address this session of the 
meeting should notify the Designated Federal Employee, at least 24 
hours prior to the start of the session. The notification may be by 
mail, telegram, cable, facsimile, or a hand-delivered note. It should 
contain the requester's name; corporate designation, consumer 
affiliation, or Government designation; along with a short statement 
describing the topic to be addressed; and the time needed for 
presentation. A nonmember requestor will ordinarily be allowed not more 
than 15 minutes to present a topic, unless specifically approved by the 
Chairman of the Board.
    Inquiries may be addressed to the Designated Federal Employee, Mr. 
Demery R. Bishop, Section Chief, Programs Development Section, CJIS 
Division, FBI, 10th and Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, Washington, DC 
20535, telephone 202-324-5084, facsimile 202-324-8906.

    Dated: April 17, 1995.
Demery R. Bishop,
Section Chief, Programs Development Section, Federal Bureau of 
Investigation, Designated Federal Employee.
[FR Doc. 95-10082 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410--2-M
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of SOLAR ENERTECH CORP. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leo Shi Young, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 15, 2009
              By:/s/ Leo Shi
      YoungLeo
      Shi YoungPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302

I, Pieter Muntendam, M.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BG Medicine, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) [reserved] / [paragraph omitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14];

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 17, 2011



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Pieter Muntendam, M.D.           
|Pieter Muntendam, M.D.               
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(principal executive officer)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report ofThe Iberian Group Inc.(the "Company") onForm 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Paul Hayward, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

Dated this 11thday of February, 2008.

PAUL HAYWARD
Paul Hayward 
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer.

















---
STATE of Louisiana v. Vincent SIMMONS

No. 19-OK-0388

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF AVOYELLES**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state *888collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.