alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      15.1





November
      3, 2006





Bois
      d'Arc Energy, Inc.


Chase
      Tower


600
      Travis, Suite 5200


Houston,
      TX 77002





Shareholders
      and Board of Directors


Bois
      d'Arc Energy, Inc.





We
      are
      aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-127744 filed on
      Form S-8 of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc. of our report dated November 3, 2006
      relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Bois
      d'Arc Energy, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2006.





/s/
      Ernst
& Young LLP





Dallas,
      Texas
Devon MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-1197

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 508 

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 

Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack 

at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 

14, 2018. 

Whereas, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting that 

claimed the lives of 17 teachers and students took place 

at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, 

Florida; 

Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for 

the individuals who were affected by this tragedy; 

Whereas the Parkland community has shown strength, compassion, and unity in the past 4 years; and 

Whereas February 14, 2022, marks 4 years since the horrific 

attack: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 508 ATS 

1 (1) honors the memories of the victims of the 

2 senseless attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High 

3 School on February 14, 2018, and offers heartfelt 

4 condolences and deepest sympathies to the families, 

5 loved ones, and friends of the victims; 

6 (2) honors the survivors of the attack and 

7 pledges continued support for their recovery; 

8 (3) recognizes the strength and resilience of the 

9 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School community; 

10 and 

11 (4) expresses gratitude to the emergency med12 ical and health care professionals of the Parkland 

13 community for their efforts in responding to the at14 tack and caring for the victims and survivors. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Jeffery Mayneard CASTEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3516

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
exv4w7






Exhibit 4.7




Consent of Peter Grieve




     I, Peter Grieve, hereby confirm that I have read the Offer and Circular of Fronteer
Development Group Inc. (the “Company”) furnished with the Company’s offer dated January 23, 2009 to
purchase all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Aurora Energy Resources Inc., which
Offer and Circular incorporates by reference the Company’s annual information form dated March 27,
2008 for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the technical report dated March 30, 2007 entitled “Technical
Report on the Pirentepe and Halilaða Exploration Properties, Çanakkale, Western Anatolia, Turkey”
(the “Technical Report”) in the AIF or other documents incorporated by reference therein. I
further consent to the inclusion in the Offer and Circular and the registration statement on Form
F-8 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration Statement”)
of the Technical Report (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of the AIF in
the Offer and Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the Offer and
Circular and the Registration Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Report and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Report contained in the Offer and Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Report
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Report.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	January 23, 2009 	  	(signed) Peter Grieve
 	 
	 	 	Peter Grieve, M.Sc., M.A.I.G.
Kerry E. CUMMINGS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4189

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 10, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 17, 2019

Kerry E. Cummings, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED. *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Wetherell, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
|   | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial Condition,      and results of operations of theCompany. |

|  Date:      August 16, 2010       | /s/      Mandi Luis                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Mandi      Luis                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                                   | President, Chief Executive      Officer, and Director(Principal Executive Officer)                                                                            |
|                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   Date:      August 16, 2010 | /s/      Robert MacKay                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                                   | Robert      MacKay                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                                   | Chief Financial Officer,      Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer, Secretary, and Director(Principal Financial Officer and Principal      Accounting Officer) |
|                                   |

----
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended Juoly 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl
Ritter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



| | /s/
      Carl Ritter        
| | -----------------------------
| | Carl Ritter                  
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (principal executive officer)
| | September 14, 2007           

---
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

Manuel O. Morera, certifies that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc.
("Pharma-Bio Serv");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
Pharma-Bio Serv as of and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. Pharma-Bio Serv's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) for Pharma-Bio Serv and have:

      a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to Pharma-Bio Serv, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Pharma-Bio Serv's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c. Disclosed in this report any change in Pharma-Bio Serv's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during its most recent fiscal
quarter (Pharma-Bio Serv's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Pharma-Bio Serv's internal control over financial reporting.

5. Pharma-Bio Serv's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reportings to
Pharma-Bio Serv's auditors and the audit committee of Pharma-Bio Serv's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect Pharma-Bio Serv's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in Pharma-Bio Serv's internal controls
over financial reporting.

                                /s/ Manuel O. Morera
                                --------------------
                                Manuel O. Morera
                                Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 11, 2006

                                       33
Michael GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4251

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 6, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin Foster Karpf, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Timothy L. Newhall, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ardent Acquisition Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I Barry J. Gordon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By | :
    /s/ Barry J. Gordon                          |  | Dated: May 15, 2006
|-- | -------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|   | Barry J. Gordon                                    |  |                    
|   | Chairman
 of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  |                    
|   | (Principal
 Executive Officer)                     |  |                    

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 541 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 541

   Commemorating the life and legacy of Jean-Louis de Kerouac on the 
               centennial of his birth on March 12, 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 10 (legislative day, March 7), 2022

    Mr. Markey (for himself and Ms. Warren) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commemorating the life and legacy of Jean-Louis de Kerouac on the 
               centennial of his birth on March 12, 2022.

Whereas Jean-Louis de Kerouac, better known as ``Jack'', was a giant of American 
        literature and favorite son of Lowell, Massachusetts;
Whereas, alongside Allen Ginsberg and William Burroughs, Jack Kerouac ignited 
        the literary movement in the 1950s known as the ``Beat Generation'';
Whereas the Beat Generation's rebuke against traditional values and materialism 
        created the foundation for subsequent counterculture movements in 
        America and beyond;
Whereas the beatnik stereotype dominated popular media and culture in the 1950s 
        and 1960s, an amalgamation of Kerouac's self-expressive, unconventional 
        characters;
Whereas the ``Beatles'' took their name after the movement, while artists such 
        as Bob Dylan and Jim Morrison cite Kerouac's work as major influences; 
        and
Whereas, more than half a century since his death, Kerouac's novels still fire 
        the imagination, particularly of young people, and serve as a tribute to 
        their culture-changing origins: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes and commemorates the enduring 
contribution of Jack Kerouac's work to American literary culture and 
beyond on the centennial of his birth.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2017124EN.01000101.xml

| 17.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/829

of 3 May 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Welsh Laverbread (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Welsh Laverbread’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Welsh Laverbread’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Welsh Laverbread’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Welsh Laverbread’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Welsh Laverbread’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.8. Other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 15, 17.1.2017, p. 6.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### In re: Carl C. HENDRICKS, Jr., Debtor. Carl C. Hendricks, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carolyn Bair, Defendant—Appellee, and Kevin Campbell, Trustee. In re: Carl C. Hendricks, Jr., Debtor. Carl C. Hendricks, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn Bair, Defendant-Appellee, and Kevin Campbell, Trustee.

Nos. 01-2006, 02-2298.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 26, 2004.

Decided May 12, 2004.

Carl C. Hendricks, Jr., Appellant pro se. Robert E. Austin, Jr., Robert E. Austin, Jr., P.A., Leesburg, Florida; Michael Conrady, Campbell Law Firm, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

In No. 01-2006, Carl C. Hendricks, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order which dismissed as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s consent order entered May 12, 2002, and denied his motion to conduct further discovery during the pendency of his appeal. In No. 02-2298, Hendricks appeals from the magis*886trate judge’s order enforcing a settlement entered into between the parties in open court.* We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and magistrate judge. *Hendricks v. Bair,*Nos. CA-00-3135-2-18; BK-99-80230 (D.S.C. July 31, 2002; Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the
“Amendment”) is made this 31st day of December 2008 between BIOMET, INC., an Indiana corporation (“Biomet”), and Steven F. Schiess (“Executive”). All capitalized terms used herein shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement (defined below), unless otherwise defined herein. 
 WHEREAS, Biomet and Executive
entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of February 28, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, Biomet and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Biomet and Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Section 9(e): Termination by the Company Other Than For Cause, Death or Disability, or by the Executive for Good Reason, Following a
Change of Control. Section 9(e)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete the final sentence of Section 9(e)(i) in its entirety and replace it with the following: 
 “The total amount of the Change of Control Severance Benefit will be paid: (1) if the Change in Control constitutes a change in control event
within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5), in a lump sum as soon as administratively practicable (but in no event later than 30 days) following the Date of Termination or (2) if the Change of Control does not constitute a change
in control event within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5), in equal, ratable installments in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll policies over the course of the Non-Compete Period.” 
 2. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment
may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 *    *    *    *    * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement on the
date first set forth above. 
  

			
	BIOMET, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Bradley J. Tandy

	Name:	 	Bradley J. Tandy
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Steven F. Schiess

	Name:	 	Steven F. Schiess
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 94 (Tuesday, May 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-12021]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. FEDERAL HOLIDAY COMMISSION


Meeting

AGENCY: Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Holiday Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Act, Public Law 92-
463, as amended, the Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Holiday Commission 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the Commission.

DATE: May 23, 1995.

TIME: 12:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m.

LOCATION: U.S. House of Representatives, O'Neill Building, House Annex 
1, Room 116, Washington, D.C. The public is invited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie Pinkney, Executive Officer, 
Washington Office (202) 708-1005.

    Dated: May 10, 1995.
Valerie Pinkney,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 94-12021 Filed 5-15-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-01-M