alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Matthew & Debra Wilkoff

FILED

July 20, 2018

JUL 2 6 2018

SUSAN Y. SOONG

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Honorable Lucy H. Koh northern D|TRiCT ofCalifornia

United States District Court

Northern District of California, San Jose Division

San Jose Courthouse, Courtroom 8 - 4th Floor

280 South 1 St Street

San Jose, CA 95113

Case No. 5:17-CV-00373-LHK

YAHOO! INO Securities Litigation

The Honorable Lucy H. Koh,

I am writing to you to object not only to the approval of this settlement agreement, but to

ask that you begin rejecting all similar settlement agreements for all class action suits

that come across your bench and start a revolution within our courts.

As a shareholder I am often presented with opportunities to receive small settlement

payments on a class action suit. Often the only party to gain are the attorneys that

brought the suit. They are the ones that put their assets at risk with the hope of

success. As their reward they are often rewarded with the repayment of all case related

expenses and a large percentage of the settlement, while those that are stated to be the

ones that were truly harmed have a limited opportunity to receive pennies, in spite of

their harm.

What troubles me even more are the hoops that shareholders are asked jump through

to receive their pennies. In this specific case I am being asked to pull records between

April 30, 2013 and December 14, 2016. From these records I am required to state each

and every transaction related to the stock during this time period. I must also provide

copies of transaction reports or statements to prove my statements. How many of the

shareholders of Yahoo! Inc stock, at the time, have these records available? Likely not

many. Me personally, each year I review my monthly statements. I keep a monthly

statement and discard it once the next statement is received and then at year end I only

keep the 12/31 statement. Of course this assumes each statement is correct.

Case 5:17-cv-00373-LHK Document 109 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:17-cv-00373-LHK Document 109 Filed 07/26/18 Page 2 of 2
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O . 09

- 22

- 00125

- CV

__________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant

V.

C.D.B. , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. X

- 2289

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State of Texas

, Appellant, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant filed the motion before the

appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISM I SSED.

PER CURIAM2 Submitted on May 18, 2022

Opinion Delivered May 19, 2022

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
S.G., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1780

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 27, 2013

s1120

Order 

Clerk

November 27, 2013

147449

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147449

COA: 311257

St. Clair CC: 86-128340-FC

FREDERICK FREEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. While retaining jurisdiction, the Court of Appeals

shall then remand the case to the St. Clair Circuit Court, which shall conduct an 

evidentiary hearing to determine whether the issue raised by the defendant merits the 

relief requested. Upon making its findings, the St. Clair Circuit Court shall return the 

case to the Court of Appeals, which shall then review the lower court’s findings and 

determine whether to affirm, reverse, or order other relief.

MCCORMACK, J., not participating because of her prior involvement in this case as 

counsel for a party.
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Howard Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity
Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      March 30, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Howard
      MahName:
                  Title:
                Howard
      Mah
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                  General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund,
  LP
Case 4:17-cv-00486 Document 7 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Theron Lamar CHRISTIAN

1170096 (CR-15-1181)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
f
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 &
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ML . DS
OAKLAND DIVISION op si vy y
7

Gr

CaseNo. Ck IT 0034 rw

United States of America,

)

)

) STIPULATED ORDER EXCLUDING

) TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
)
)
)

Plaintiff,

v.
Satine Fhe
Defendant.

For the reason stated by the parties on the record on June z4 , 2017, the Court excludes time under the Speedy
Trial Act from 9 *4? 29 2017, to Gey 2 2017 and finds that the ends of justice served by the

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A). The Court makes this finding and bases this continuance on the following factors:

Failure to grant a continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)().

The case is so unusual or so complex, due to [circle applicable reasons] the number of
defendants, the nature of the prosecution, or the existence of novel questions of fact

or law, that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or the trial
itself within the time limits established by this section. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).

Failure to grant a continuance would deny the defendant reasonable time to obtain counsel,
taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant continuity of counsel,
given counsel's other scheduled case commitments, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

VY __ Failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

For the reasons stated on the record, it is further ordered that time is excluded under 18 U.S.C. §
3161(b) and waived with the consent of the defendant under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

5.1(c) and (d).

For the reasons stated on the record, it is further ordered that time is excluded under 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(1)(E)(F) for delay resulting from removal/transport of the defendant to another district.

Va
DONNA M. RYU
~ United States Magistrate Judge

Pre Gere

Attorney for Defendant Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

=
DATED: _j ¥@¥ 27 » 2017

STIPULATED:
Exhibit 15.1

February 2, 2009

The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-33344, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-01459, 333-56577,
333-09867, 333-34543, 333-38163, 333-40675, 333-40677, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034,
333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332, 333-101323, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586, 333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507, 333-138593, 333-147268 and 333-155155; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and
333-142795) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our reports dated November 3, 2008 and February 2, 2009, relating to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Forms 10-Q
for the quarters ended September 28, 2008 and December 28, 2008.



Very truly yours,/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer forBrookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to aMaster Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield AssetManagement Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., BrookfieldInfrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield Asset Management BarbadosInc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to hisknowledge on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership onForm 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “AnnualReport”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the informationcontained in such Annual Report, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A,fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Partnership.

 

Date:November 23, 2010

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/  John Stinebaugh                              |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | John  Stinebaugh                                  |
|   | Title: | CFO,  Brookfield Infrastructure Group Corporation |

 

1

----
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Capital Asset Management, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
A. Barron, Chief Executive Officer and I, Lee Shorey, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Michael A.
Barron


Michael
A. Barron


Chief
Executive Officer





/s/  Lee
Shorey


Lee
Shorey


Chief
Financial Officer
Dean PODSTUPKA, Sr. and Marcia Podstupka, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. T.D. BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0745

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL TOTAL TIME (mins):

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MINUTE ORDER

DEPUTY CLERK REPORTER/FTR

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATE NEW CASE CASE NUMBER

APPEARANCES

DEFENDANT AGE CUST P/NP ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT PD. RET.

APPT.

U.S. ATTORNEY INTERPRETER FIN. AFFT

SUBMITTED 

COUNSEL APPT'D 

PROBATION OFFICER PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER DEF ELIGIBLE FOR

APPT'D COUNSEL 

PARTIAL PAYMENT 

OF CJA FEES 

PROCEEDINGS SCHEDULED TO OCCUR

INITIAL APPEAR PRELIM HRG MOTION JUGM'T & SENTG STATUS

TRIAL SET 

I.D. COUNSEL ARRAIGNMENT BOND HEARING IA REV PROB. or

 or S/R

OTHER

DETENTION HRG ID / REMOV HRG CHANGE PLEA PROB. REVOC. ATTY APPT 

HEARING

INITIAL APPEARANCE

ADVISED

OF RIGHTS

ADVISED

OF CHARGES

NAME AS CHARGED

IS TRUE NAME

TRUE NAME:

ARRAIGNMENT

ARRAIGNED ON

INFORMATION

ARRAIGNED ON

INDICTMENT

READING WAIVED

SUBSTANCE

WAIVER OF INDICTMENT FILED

RELEASE

RELEASED

ON O/R

ISSUED

APPEARANCE BOND

AMT OF SECURITY SPECIAL NOTES PASSPORT

SURRENDERED

DATE: 

$

PROPERTY TO BE POSTED CORPORATE SECURITY REAL PROPERTY:

CASH $

MOTION

FOR

DETENTION

PRETRIAL

SERVICES

REPORT

DETAINED RELEASED DETENTION HEARING

AND FORMAL FINDINGS

WAIVED

REMANDED

TO CUSTODY

ORDER REMOVED TO THE DISTRICT OF 

PLEA

CONSENT

ENTERED

NOT GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY TO COUNTS:

PRESENTENCE

REPORT ORDERED

CHANGE OF PLEA PLEA AGREEMENT

FILED

OTHER:

CONTINUANCE

 TO: ATTY APPT

HEARING

BOND

HEARING

STATUS RE:

CONSENT TRIAL SET

 AT: SUBMIT FINAN.

AFFIDAVIT

PRELIMINARY

HEARING

_____________

ARRAIGNMENT

CHANGE OF

PLEA

STATUS

BEFORE HON. DETENTION

HEARING

 MOTIONS JUDGMENT &

SENTENCING

TIME WAIVED TIME EXCLUDABLE 

UNDER 18 § USC

3161

IDENTITY /

REMOVAL

HEARING

PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE

PROB/SUP REV.

HEARING

ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS

DOCUMENT NUMBER:

Case 4:17-mj-70058-MAG Document 2 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., Brookfield
Infrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield Asset Management Barbados Inc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.

Dated: April 27, 2012



/s/ Samuel PollockSamuel PollockCEO, Brookfield Infrastructure Group Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          45,282
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,706
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    197,969
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        576,255
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 863,030
<DEPOSITS>                                     669,862
<SHORT-TERM>                                    55,074
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,918
<LONG-TERM>                                     68,531
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,203
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 863,030
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,747
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,966
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   172
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,885
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,287
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,125
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,760
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      883
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  76
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,766
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,962
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,962
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.26
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,912
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   472
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,384
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,360
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      299
<RECOVERIES>                                       147
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,091
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,091
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantair, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Santo, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ Steven Santo       
|Name:  |  | Steven Santo           
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer



27
EXHIBIT 15.1

February 8, 2007

The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-25860, 33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-09867, 333-34543, 333-38163,
333-40677, 333-67183, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788, 333-52314, 333-56358, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332, 333-101323, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586,
333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507 and 333-138593; and Form S-3 No. 333-81101) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our reports dated October 25, 2006 and February 8, 2007 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarters ended October 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006.



Very truly yours,/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP
EXHIBIT 12

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-12 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
Kevin DESRUISSEAUX, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Nicole BOWMAN, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed. Stricken.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-11071

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANDRE LAMAR COLLIER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-31-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Andre Lamar Collier presents

arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Harrimon, 568 F.3d 531, 532

(5th Cir.2009), which held that a violation of TEXAS PENAL CODE §38.04(b)(1) is

a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, and United

States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other

grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006), which

held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-11071

2

to an unimposed state sentence. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield Asset Management Barbados Inc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”), as amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 20-F/A, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report, as amended by Amendment No. 2 on Form 20-F/A, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

Date: June 10, 2011

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   John Stinebaugh                              |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | John   Stinebaugh                                  |
|   | Title: | CFO,   Brookfield Infrastructure Group Corporation |

 

1

----
A.D.G., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3030

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John Allen LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1629

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.