alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


Certification Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1850,  as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of The Wilber Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

      (a)  the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended June
      30,  2004,  filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission  (the  "Report"),   fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
      material respects,   the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company as of and for the period covered by this report.


                                 -----------------------------------------
                                 Joseph E. Sutaris
                                 Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                 Date:  August 5, 2004
                                        --------------
# L_2018072DE.01004201.xml

| 15.3.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 72/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 72/42

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2017/2400 der Kommission vom 12. Dezember 2017 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 595/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Bestimmung der CO2-Emissionen und des Kraftstoffverbrauchs von schweren Nutzfahrzeugen sowie zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates sowie der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 582/2011 der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 349 vom 29. Dezember 2017
  )

Seite 3, Artikel 2 Absatz 1:

Anstatt:

„Vorbehaltlich des Artikels 4 Absatz 2 gilt diese Verordnung für Fahrzeuge der Klasse N2 gemäß der Begriffsbestimmung in Anhang II der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG, mit einer Gesamtmasse von höchstens 3,5 Tonnen, und für alle Fahrzeuge der Klasse N3 gemäß diesem Anhang.“

muss es heißen:

„Vorbehaltlich des Artikels 4 Absatz 2 gilt diese Verordnung für Fahrzeuge der Klasse N2 gemäß der Begriffsbestimmung in Anhang II der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG mit einer technisch zulässigen Gesamtmasse im beladenen Zustand von mehr als 7 500 kg und für alle Fahrzeuge der Klasse N3 gemäß dem genannten Anhang.“

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6451

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TANNER MOREN EAGLE LARCH , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. ( 1:18

- cr - 00146

- MR

- WCM

- 1; 1:23

- cv - 00049

- MR )

Submitted : August 15, 2024 Decided: September 17, 2024

Before THACKER , Circuit Judge , and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judges

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tanner Moren Eagle Larch, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6451 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Tanner Moren Eagle Larch seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating tha t reasonab le jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims d ebatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Larch ’ s informal brief , we conclude that Larch has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ( “ The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief. ” ) . Larch has not demonstrated that jurists of reason could find debatable the district court’s denial of relief on his challenges to the constitutionality of his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) convictions and his term of supervised release. We further conclude tha t the district court did not abuse its discretion in de nying Larch’s motion without issuing an order to show USCA4 Appeal: 23-6451 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/17/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 cause to the Government, conducting an evidentiary hearing, and appointing counsel for Larch

. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Larch’s motion to vacate and remand for further proceedings and deny as moot his motion to remove t his appeal from abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6451 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/17/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 795 

Designating September 2022 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. PETERS, and Mr. WARNOCK) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2022 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Whereas, in an average year, on every school day in the 

United States, approximately 506,520 public and private 

school buses carry more than 26,000,000 K–12 students 

to and from school; 

Whereas school buses comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the United States; 

Whereas, in an average year, 48 percent of all K–12 students 

ride a school bus for each of the 180 school days in a 

year, and school bus operators drive school buses a total 

of nearly 4,400,000,000 miles; 

Whereas the Child Safety Network (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘CSN’’), which is celebrating 33 years of 

public service in the United States, supports the CSN 

Safe Ride campaign, which is designed to provide the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 795 ATS 

school bus industry with driver training, the latest technology, and free safety and security resources, including 

resources to help parents raise safer and healthier children; 

Whereas the designation of School Bus Safety Month will 

allow broadcast and digital media and social networking 

industries to commit to disseminating public service announcements that are produced to— 

(1) provide free resources designed to safeguard children; 

(2) recognize school bus operators and professionals; 

and 

(3) encourage the driving public to engage in safer 

driving behavior near school buses when students board 

and disembark from school buses; 

Whereas key leaders who deserve recognition during School 

Bus Safety Month and beyond have— 

(1) provided security awareness training materials to 

more than 14,000 public and private schools; 

(2) trained more than 118,139 school bus operators; 

and 

(3) provided more than 166,798 counterterrorism 

guides to individuals who are key to providing both safety 

and security for children in the United States; and 

Whereas School Bus Safety Month offers the Senate and the 

people of the United States an opportunity to recognize 

and thank the school bus operators and the professionals 

focused on school bus safety and security in the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 795 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2022 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 33.4**

**Management’s Assertion on**

**Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria**

BancTec, Inc. (“BancTec” or the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing its compliance, as ofand for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2012 (the “Reporting Period”), with certain servicing criteria applicable to it in connection with the Services Agreement dated as of September 30, 2008, as amended, (the “ServicesAgreement”) between BancTec, Inc. and DB Servicing Corporation (“DBSC”), assignee of, DFS Services LLC. The Asserting Party used the selected criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and (d)(4)(iv) (such applicable criteria, asdiscussed below, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”), to assess such compliance with respect to support services provided to DBSC. The transactions covered by this report include all asset-backed securities transactions involving creditcard receivables conducted by Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or were not required to beregistered where the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period (the “Platform”). 

BancTec does not have sole responsibility for either of the Applicable Servicing Criteria, but instead provides support services to DBSCand Discover Bank that are necessary to their compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Specifically, BancTec is responsible for (a) capturing data with respect to cardmember payments and associated checks, (b) transmitting suchdata to DBSC and Discover Bank on a timely basis consistent with their compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria; and (c) delivering certain of such checks to a third party financial institution for deposit into a bank account held inthe name of Discover Bank. BancTec is not responsible for (x) ensuring that deposits are posted to Discover Bank’s bank accounts, (y) following up with regard to unposted deposits, and (z) posting payments to anycardmember’s account. BancTec has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, to the extent it is responsible for such aspects of such compliance, and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all materialrespects, with those aspects of the Applicable Servicing Criteria for which it is responsible for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. 

 

Date: February 20, 2013
WestLake


SETTLEMENT
SERVICES




Mark J.
Girasole


President


ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


The Tax
Outsourcing Service Agreement dated as of October 1, 2006 (together with all
amendments thereto, the "Agreement") between Aurora Loan Services and WestLake
Settlement Services, LLC.


I, Mark
Girasole, the president of WestLake Settlement Services, certify to Aurora Loan
Services, with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this
certification, that:


(1) As of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007, WestLake Settlement Services, LLC has
complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
Regulation AB applicable to WestLake (the ''Applicable Servicing
Criteria"):


1122(d)(4)(xi)
Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance payments) are
made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as indicated on the
appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided that such support has
been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar days prior to these dates, or
such other number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.


1122(d)(4)(xii)
Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be made on behalf
of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged to the obligor,
unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or
omission.


WESTLAKE
SETTLEMENT SERVICES


/s/
Mark Girasole


Mark
Girasole, President


March 3,
2008






1 American
Way •  DFW 6-4-100 • Westlake, TX 76262 • T 817 699
5733  •  www.westlake.com
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10312]



[[Page 20751]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Joint Research and Development Venture 
Agreement for Seismic Technology

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 10, 1995, pursuant to the 
National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 
Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Paul W. Pendorf, President of XXsys 
Technologies, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties are: XXsys Technologies, 
Inc./Composite Retrofit Corp., San Diego, CA; Hercules Incorporated, 
Wilmington, DE; and Trans-Science Corp., La Jolla, CA. The general area 
of planned activity is to develop and demonstrate low cost 
manufacturing process and design/sensor technologies for seismic 
upgrading of bridge columns. An award from the Advanced Technology 
Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. 
Department of Commerce will partially fund this joint Research and 
Development Activity.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 95-10312 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
Z.N., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3525

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00551-LHK 

ORDER RE CLASS COUNSEL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHRISTINA GRACE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

APPLE, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00551-LHK 

ORDER RE CLASS COUNSEL

To ensure efficiency, the Court adopts the following protocols. No firms other than those 

approved as class counsel, ECF No. 269, shall work on this class action without prior approval of the 

Court. 

The Court further orders that any billers who will seek fees in this case, including staff, 

consultants, and experts, shall maintain contemporaneous billing records of all time spent litigating 

this case. By “contemporaneous,” the Court means that an individual’s time spent on a particular 

activity should be recorded no later than seven days after that activity occurred. Ms. Manning shall 

review and approve attorney’s fees and costs each month and strike any duplicative or unreasonable 

fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 270 Filed 09/18/18 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00551-LHK 

ORDER RE CLASS COUNSEL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Dated: September 18, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 270 Filed 09/18/18 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stinger
Systems, Inc., for the period ended March 31, 2007;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Robert F. GruderRobert F. GruderChief Executive Officer
Dated:  3/27/2008                                                                       By: /s/           E. Todd Whittemore  Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-7 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications**(Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)Name:In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as ServicerLaSalle Bank National Association, as CustodianNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCU.S. Bank National Association, as Securities Administrator and CustodianWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CustodianWestlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
Arnold H. THOMAS, Appellant, v. Scott E. GRUBER, Appellee.

No. 1D19-0506

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAY L. SELLERS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JANET E NAPOLITANO, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00112-WHO 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE'S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND 

DISMISSING CASE

Dkt. No. 8

The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim's Report and Recommendation Re: 

Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The time for filing objections has passed and no 

objections have been filed. The court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and 

adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, plaintiff Jay L. Sellers’ complaint is dismissed as frivolous 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff will be granted leave to amend his complaint within 20 days of 

the date below. 

Plaintiff may wish to seek assistance with the Legal Help Center, a free service of the 

Volunteer Legal Services Program, by calling (415) 782-8982 or signing up for an appointment on 

the 15th Floor of the Courthouse, Room 2796. At the Legal Help Center, plaintiff may speak with 

an attorney who may be able to provide basic legal help, but not legal representation. The Court 

also urges plaintiff to obtain a copy of the Pro Se Handbook, available free of charge from the 

Court’s website (www.cand.uscourts.gov) or in the Clerk’s Office on the 16th Floor, 450 Golden 

Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. 94102. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 29, 2017 

______________________________________ 

WILLIAM H. ORRICK 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:17-cv-00112-WHO Document 11 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 1