alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX PARTE Mitchell Bernard JOHNSON

CR-17-0048

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
RxBids (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mack
Bradley, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.








/s/   Mack
Bradley





Chief
Executive Officer


Principal
Financial Officer


April 15,
2010




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
document.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50199

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NATHANIEL McCLAINE,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA 94 CR 157

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nathaniel McClaine appeals his conviction for possession

with the intent to distribute cocaine base within 1000 feet of a

public school and using and carrying a firearm during and in

relation to that offense. 

He argues that the search of the vehicle amounted to an

illegal exploratory search beyond the bounds of the search

warrant. The vehicle was included in the warrant as a portion of

the premises to be searched. To the extent that McClaine argues
No. 95-50199

-2-

that there was no probable cause to search, the law enforcement

agents relied upon the warrant, with the vehicle's description,

and McClaine does not contend that the supporting affidavit was

barebones. Thus, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary

rule would apply. See United States v. Satterwhite, 980 F.2d

317, 320-21 (5th Cir. 1992).

McClaine argues that the district court should have

excluded, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(6)(C) and (D), his

statements made to law enforcement officers. This contention was

not raised before the district court. Under Fed. R. Crim. P.

52(b), this court may correct forfeited errors only when the

appellant shows the following factors: (1) there is an error,

(2) that is clear or obvious, and (3) that affects his

substantial rights. United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160,

162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (citing United States v. Olano,

113 S. Ct. 1770, 1776-79 (1993)), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266

(1995). If these factors are established, the decision to

correct the forfeited error is within the sound discretion of the

court, and the court will not exercise that discretion unless the

error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public

reputation of judicial proceedings. Olano, 113 S. Ct. at 1778.

Rule 11(e)(6)(D) is inapplicable to the circumstances. 

Moreover, nothing in the record indicates that plea negotiations

occurred between McClaine and the law enforcement agent. Thus,

no error occurred, plain or otherwise. See Calverley, 37 F.3d at

162.

AFFIRMED.
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                Historical Status of OTC Rulemakings

Historical Status of OTC Rulemakings Home
          Drugs
          Development & Approval Process | Drugs
          How Drugs are Developed and Approved
          Over-the-Counter OTC | Nonprescription Drugs
          Historical Status of OTC Rulemakings
          Rulemaking History for OTC Fever Blister Drug ProductsHistorical Status of OTC Rulemakings Rulemaking History for OTC Fever Blister Drug Products
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintOTC Fever Blister Drug Product information can be found on the following pages:

External Analgesic
	Oral Wound Healing Drug Products
	Skin Protectant

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      01/10/2020Historical Status of OTC Rulemakings
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
David Herbert PARSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3047

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of Solar EnerTech Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve Ye, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      February 12, 2010
              By:/s/ Steve
      YeSteve
      YeChief
      Financial Officer
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 | Gamecorp Ltd. |                                                                                                                            |
|----------------------|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |          |                                                                                                                            |   |
| Date: April 13, 2010 | By:           | /s/ John G. Simmonds                                                                                                            |   |
|                 |          | Name: John G. Simmonds                                                                                                     |   |
|                 |          | Title : Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer CEO, CFO, Director and Chairman of the Board |   |
|                 |          |                                                                                                                            |   |
Letter Amendment to the Investment Advisor Agreement



 Exhibit 10.15.5 
 [JPMorgan Asset Management Letterhead] 
 January 8, 2009 
 Robert E. Fullam 
 ABA Retirement Funds Program 
 C/o State Street Global Advisors 
 1200 Crown Colony 1N 
 Quincy, MA PO: 02169 
 Re: Amendment to Investment Management Agreement – ABA Retirement Funds Program

 I refer to the Investment Management Agreement dated April 1st, 2003 (as heretofore amended the “Agreement”) between JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited (f/k/a J.P. Morgan Fleming Asset Management (London)
Limited) and State Street Bank and Trust Company of New Hampshire (as assignee from State Street Bank and Trust Company) (“State Street”). 
 Effective October 1, 2008, Appendix D of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 APPENDIX D

 For its services rendered as investment advisor under the Agreement, the Advisor will be compensated at the annual rates set forth below,
based on the aggregate value of the assets in the Subaccount as determined by State Street. Such compensation shall be calculated and accrued on a daily basis and paid monthly from the assets of the Subaccount; 
  

				
	 Value of Assets
	  	Rate	 
	 First $50 million
	  	0.75	%
	 Next $50 million
	  	0.65	%
	 Over $100 million
	  	0.45	%

 provided, however, that at any time the aggregate value of the assets in the Subaccount as
determined by State Street falls below $150 million, the Advisor will be compensated at the annual rates set forth below: 
  

				
	 Value of Assets
	  	Rate	 
	 First $100 million
	  	0.65	%
	 Next $50 million
	  	0.55	%

 A monthly invoice will be sent by email and post to Joseph Penella at: 







 ABA Retirement Funds Program 
 C/o State Street Global Advisors 
 1200 Crown Colony 1N, 
 Quincy, MA 02169 
 Please confirm your acceptance of our intended amendment to the Agreement set forth herein by signing and returning the attached
copy of this letter in accordance with your authorized signatories. 
 AGREED TO and ACCEPTED BY: 
  

			
	JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited
		
	Signature:	 	/s/ Emily Worth
	Name:	 	Emily Worth
	Title:	 	Vice President
	Date:	 	January 8, 2009

  
  

			
	State Street Bank and Trust Company of New Hampshire
		
	Signature:	 	/s/ Robert E. Fullam
	Name:	 	Robert E. Fullam
	Title:	 	Vice President
	Date:	 	January 13, 2009

  

 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

N

ORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE

This document has been removed

by order of the court.

For more information, please see the entire docket sheet,

or contact the clerk's office, or consult chambers.

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 247-3 Filed 07/14/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2013-A





The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2013 (as amended and supplemented,
or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2013-A, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting
Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer
this 30th day of March, 2016.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
Approval
of Extended Term of Validity of Land Purchase Confirmation Issued by the
Administration of Housing and Land of Minxing District, Shanghai

     

    


     

    Perfectenergy
Solar Tech. (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.:

     

    


     

    We have
received your application to extend the term of validity of the Land Purchase
Confirmation (No. 200802102) concerning the Industrial No.36 Land of Wujing town
(“the No.36 Land”) and approved that the term of validity be extended for three
months. The approved term of validity shall be from now to March 18, 2009.
Meanwhile, you should process the applications for project inspection and
approval and relevant procedures with governmental authorities of environmental
protection, investment and city planning. When the project is inspected and
approved by the government, you should start the project as soon as
possible.

     

    


     

    


     

    


     

    


     

    


     

    The
Administration of Housing and Land of Minxing District, Shanghai
(stamp)

     

    December
18, 2008
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly Henderson, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 12, 2009/s/ Molly HendersonMolly
      HendersonChief
      Business and Financial Officer and Senior Vice
  President





This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Tian Ling, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xinyinhai Technology, Ltd.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: May 18, 2007 /s/ Tian Ling Tian Ling, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield Asset Management Barbados Inc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  Dated:  April 30, 2013   /s/   John StinebaughJohn   StinebaughCFO,   Brookfield Infrastructure Group Corporation
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981)

Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)

Joe Angelo (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste 100

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 297-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TANESHA COLLAZO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., et al,

Defendants.

Case No.: 4:17-cv-00416-YGR

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Tanesha Collazo and defendant

Experian Information Solutions, Inc. that Experian Information Solutions, Inc. be dismissed 

from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), 

and that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

//

//

//

//

//

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 41 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: May 22, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot Gale

Elliot Gale

Attorney for Plaintiff Tanesha Collazo

DATED: May 22, 2017 Jones Day

By: /s/ Benjamin Chung Lee

Benjamin Chung Lee

Attorney for Defendant Experian 

Information Solutions, Inc.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Benjamin Chung Lee has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is 

dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:17-cv-00416-YGR Document 41 Filed 05/24/17 Page 2 of 2