alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ABPAYMAR, LLC, AS TRUSTEE OF the 5649 HAMILTON HARBOR DRIVE LAND TRUST, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0104

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 630 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of May 1, 2022, through 

May 7, 2022, as ‘‘National Small Business Week’’ to celebrate the 

contributions of small businesses and entrepreneurs in every community 

in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2022 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CARPER, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. 

RISCH, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. BOOKER, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. 

KING, Mr. WARNOCK, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. ERNST, Mr. 

MARSHALL, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. 

WYDEN, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Ms. SMITH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. REED, Ms. 

WARREN, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. COONS, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. 

ROUNDS, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. WICKER, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, 

Mr. BRAUN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. PETERS, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. INHOFE, 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. DAINES, Mr. YOUNG, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. HAWLEY, 

and Mr. BOOZMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of May 

1, 2022, through May 7, 2022, as ‘‘National Small Business Week’’ to celebrate the contributions of small businesses and entrepreneurs in every community in the 

United States. 

Whereas a ‘‘National Small Business Week’’ has been declared by every President since 1963; 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 630 ATS 

Whereas there are more than 32,000,000 small businesses in 

the United States that support more than 61,000,000 

jobs; 

Whereas thousands of small business establishments were 

hard hit by the COVID–19 pandemic and government 

lockdowns; 

Whereas small businesses will continue to play an integral 

role in rebuilding the economy of the United States; and 

Whereas May 1, 2022, through May 7, 2022, would be an 

appropriate week to celebrate ‘‘National Small Business 

Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) honors and celebrates the entrepreneurial 

3 spirit and contributions of small businesses in every 

4 community in the United States; 

5 (2) applauds the efforts and achievements of 

6 the owners of small businesses and their employees 

7 in every community of the United States; 

8 (3) recognizes that, in the face of significant 

9 challenges, the owners of small businesses have dem10 onstrated incredible resilience over the past 2 years; 

11 (4) supports the designation of ‘‘National Small 

12 Business Week’’; 

13 (5) acknowledges the importance of providing 

14 access to underserved firms; and 

15 (6) supports efforts to— 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 630 ATS 

1 (A) hold Federal agencies accountable for 

2 fraud, waste, and abuse of taxpayer dollars; and 

3 (B) create an environment that enables 

4 small businesses to grow and create jobs. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification ofPrincipal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350,

As AdoptedPursuant to

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Mauceli,principal executive officer of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P., certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date: May 14, 2009 | Reef Oil & Gas  Partners, L.P.        |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Managing General  Partner                      |
|                    |                                           |
|                    | By: Reef Oil &  Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                    |                                           |
|                    | /s/ Michael J. Mauceli                         |
|                    | Michael J. Mauceli                             |
|                    | Manager and Member                             |
|                    | *(principal executive officer)*                |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of § 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by § 906 has been providedto the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 In connection with the Report of SOLAR
ENERTECH CORP. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Leo Shi Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:February 13, 2009
              By:/s/ Leo Shi
      YoungLeo Shi
    YoungPresident and Chief Executive
      Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32316]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. FE C&E 94-16--Certification Notice--144]


Longview Fibre Company; Notice of Filing of Coal Capability 
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 16, 1994, Longview Fibre Company submitted a coal 
capability self-certification pursuant to section 201 of the Powerplant 
and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, as amended.

ADDRESSES: Copies of self-certification filings are available for 
public inspection, upon request, in the Office of Fuels Programs, 
Fossil Energy, Room 3F-056, FE-52, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Russell at (202) 586-9624.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of the Powerplant and Industrial 
Fuel Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 et seq.), 
provides that no new baseload electric powerplant may be constructed or 
operated without the capability to use coal or another alternate fuel 
as a primary energy source. In order to meet the requirement of coal 
capability, the owner or operator of such facilities proposing to use 
natural gas or petroleum as its primary energy source shall certify, 
pursuant to FUA section 201(d), to the Secretary of Energy prior to 
construction, or prior to operation as a base load powerplant, that 
such powerplant has the capability to use coal or another alternate 
fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with section 201(a) as 
of the date filed with the Department of Energy. The Secretary is 
required to publish a notice in the Federal Register that a 
certification has been filed. The following owner/operator of a 
proposed new baseload powerplant has filed a self-certification in 
acccordance with section 201(d).
    Owner: Longview Fibre Company
    Longview, Washington.
    Operator: Longview Fibre Company
    Longview, Washington.
    Location: Longview, Washington.
    Plant Configuration: Combined cycle Cogeneration.
    Capacity: 68 megawatts.
    Fuel: Natural gas.
    Purchasing Entities: No present contracts (expects to sell 50% 
output in the future).
    In-Service Date: May, 1995.

    Issued in Washington, DC, December 28, 1994.
Anthony J. Como,
Director, Office of Coal & Electricity, Office of Fuels Programs, 
Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 94-32316 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[Cite as State v. Gray, 2014-Ohio-1476.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Plaintiff-Appellee, :

CASE NO. 2014-T-0008 

 -vs- : 

ROOSEVELT D. GRAY, : 

 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

Criminal Appeal from the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas. 

Case No. 93 CR 112. 

Judgment: Appeal dismissed. 

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 

160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH 44481-1092 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). 

Andrea L. Reino, The Law Offices of Andrea L. Reino, 602 Main Street, Suite 1005, 

Cincinnati, OH 45202 (For Defendant-Appellant). 

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J. 

{¶1} On February 12, 2014, appellant, by and through counsel, filed his notice 

of appeal from a January 9, 2014 judgment entry issued by the Trumbull County Court 

of Common Pleas. The appealed judgment denies appellant’s post-sentencing motion 

to withdraw his guilty plea. 

{¶2} App.R. 4(A) states in part: “A party shall file the notice of appeal required 

by App.R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed.” 
2

{¶3} In this case, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by February 10, 2014, 

which was not a holiday or a weekend. However, the notice was not filed until February 

12, 2014. In addition, the trial court docket reflects that the parties were served with a 

copy of the appealed judgment within the three-day time period in Civ.R. 58(B). 

{¶4} App.R. 5(A) states, in relevant part: 

(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 

4(A) for the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be 

taken by a defendant with leave of the court to which the appeal is 

taken in the following classes of cases: 

(a) Criminal proceedings; 

(b) Delinquency proceedings; and 

(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings. 

(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of 

appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the 

appellant to perfect an appeal as of right. Concurrently with the 

filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the trial 

court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and 

shall file a copy of the notice of the appeal in the court of appeal. * 

* *. 

{¶5} In the present case, appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule 

set forth in App.R. 4(A) nor sought leave to appeal. Thus, this court is without 

jurisdiction to consider the appeal. 

{¶6} Based upon the foregoing analysis, the appeal is hereby sua sponte 

dismissed as being untimely. 

{¶7} Appeal dismissed. 

DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., 

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., 

concur.
Statement of FCA Board Member Jill Long Thompson

at the FCA Board Meeting

November 9, 2011

This week the Board approved Notational Vote 11-25, Policy Statement 81 on Ethics, 

Independence, Arm’s-Length Role, Ex Parte Communications and Open Government. I thank 

fellow Board Members Strom and Spearman for their support. I also thank Wendy Laguarda, the 

Agency’s ethics officer who does an excellent job running our ethics program, for her wise 

counsel and tireless work in developing this Policy Statement. And I thank the three Executive 

Assistants, Mike Stokke, Howard Rubin, and Inga Smulkstys, as well as Chief Operating Officer

Bill Hoffman, for their diligence in helping the Board find common ground on this issue. This 

Board action makes me more than a little proud.

As an independent, arm’s length regulatory agency, the Farm Credit Administration is entrusted 

with responsibilities that are unique to prudential regulators. We are charged not only with 

ensuring the safety and soundness of the Farm Credit System, but doing so based upon 

objective criteria, independent of the Legislative and Executive Branches, and at arm’s length 

from the System. Public trust is a pillar of a democratic government; as regulators, we have

been entrusted with ensuring the highest of standards, as well as the appearance of the highest 

of standards. We also have responsibility to ensure continuity in upholding such standards.

Because the FCA is an independent, arm’s length prudential regulator, it performs a different 

function than other Executive Branch agencies of the Federal Government. Our ethics rules 

must reflect those differences and that is why it is important that we go beyond what is required 

in the Government-wide Standards of Ethical Conduct. Policy Statement 81 was written after a 

benchmarking study found a number of other prudential regulatory agencies had adopted 

additional policies and standards pertinent to their specific authorities and responsibilities. In 

adopting this Policy Statement, we have acknowledged the uniqueness of our own charge. 

Even more, we have acknowledged the significance of the Farm Credit System in advancing the 

agricultural and rural economy. This member-owned System is so critical to rural America and it 

deserves the highest of standards from its regulator. With the adoption of Policy Statement 81, 

we make clear our confidence and belief in the Farm Credit System and we also make clear our 

dedication to being the best and most effective regulator we can be.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 113 

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the committees of 

the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the 

committees of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the commit2 tees of the Senate, together with related materials, be 

3 printed as a Senate document, and that there be printed 

4 250 additional copies of such document for the use of the 

5 Committee on Rules and Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Rafeh Hulays, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Netfone, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Netfone, Inc. for the six month period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Netfone, Inc.

Dated: May 17, 2005
| /s/ Rafeh Hulays |
|------------------|

Rafeh Hulays

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial 

Officer and Principal Reporting Officer)
Sherrill L. SINGLETON, DOC #158639, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-838

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRUCE ORTEGA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00279-VC (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 2

Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, a state inmate, has filed a pro se civil action under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 against Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ortega, David Nickerson, California 

Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye and California Supreme Court Justices 

Kathryn M. Werdegar, Carol A. Corrigan, Ming W. Chin and Goodwin H. Liu. Bonilla also 

moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Bonilla has been disqualified from proceeding in 

forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) unless he is “under imminent danger of serious 

physical injury” at the time he filed his complaint. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); In re Steven Bonilla, No. 

C 11-3180 CW (PR); Bonilla v. Dawson, No. C 13-0951 CW (PR). 

The allegations in this complaint do not show that Bonilla was in imminent danger at the 

time of filing. Therefore, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Moreover, even if 

the IFP application were granted, his lawsuit would be barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 

477, 486-87 (1994). Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice.

Case 3:17-cv-00279-VC Document 3 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 2
2

This Order terminates docket number 2.

The Clerk shall enter a separate judgment and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

January 31, 2017

Case 3:17-cv-00279-VC Document 3 Filed 01/31/17 Page 2 of 2
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40124 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. BUOKAI S ONSI NG PEEL ER , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 1: 07- C R
- 17- 1 B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney ap poi n t ed t o represent B u oka iSon si n g P eel erha s m oved f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . P eel erha s not f i l ed a response. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew o f th e re c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. The r e c o r d d o e s r e ve ala c l e r i c ale r rori n t he j udg m e nt . The j udg m e nt ref l ect s t h at Peel er w as assess ed a $2 00 fi n e. H ow ever, t h e di st ri ctcourt ac t ual l y o r de r e d Pe e l e rt o pa y $2 00 i n r e s t i t ut i o n. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 3, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-40124 Document: 00511019240 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2010N o. 09- 40124

2 A ccor di n gly, c o uns e l ’ s m ot i on f or l eave to w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun sel i s ex cu sed f

rom f u rth er re sp on sibilitie s h ere i n , an d the A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. Th i s m att er i s R E M A N D E D f or c orrec t i on of t h e cl eri calerr or pursu an tt o F ED . R . C RIM . P. 36. Case: 09-40124 Document: 00511019240 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2010
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FTC’S MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO SERVE TRIAL SUBPOENA

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO SERVE TRIAL SUBPOENA

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 991 Filed 12/13/18 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FTC’S MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO SERVE TRIAL SUBPOENA

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For good cause shown, the motion of the Federal Trade Commission for an order allowing 

it to effect service of Rule 45 trial subpoenas by certified mail addressed to the residences of Mr. 

Steven Altman and Mr. Derek Aberle is hereby GRANTED.

It is SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________, 2018 ___________________________________

Honorable Lucy H. Koh 

United States District Judge

December 13

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 991 Filed 12/13/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jonathan I. Schwartz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 26, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                  |  |     |  |                                
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/  JONATHAN I. SCHWARTZ      
|                  |  |     |  | Name: Jonathan I. Schwartz     
|                  |  |     |  | Title:  Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 29 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary 
                              Standard''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``COVID-19 
Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard'' (86 Fed. Reg. 
61402 (November 5, 2021)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate December 8, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
 United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary 
                              Standard''.
```