alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10048]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Receipt of Applications for Approval

    The following applicants have applied for approval to conduct 
certain activities with birds that are protected in accordance with the 
Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992. This notice is provided pursuant to 
section 112(4) of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, 50 CFR 
15.26(c).
    Applicant: Jerry Blocker, Rio Linda, CA. The applicant wishes to 
establish a cooperative breeding program for the Eurasian eagle owl 
(Bubo bubo), Lanner falcon (Falco biarmicus), Saker falcon (Falco 
cherrug), and the Tawny eagle (Aquila rapax). Mr. Blocker wishes to be 
an active participant in this program with one other private 
individual. The American Wildlife Rescue Service has assumed the 
responsibility for the oversight of the program.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 420C, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be 
received by the Director within 30 days of the date of this 
publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
420C, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/358-
2281).

    Dated: April 14, 1995.
Dr. Susan Lieberman,
Chief, Branch of Operations, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 95-10048 Filed 4-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Integrated Business Systems and Services, Inc. Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Integrated Business Systems and
Services, Inc. (the Company) for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George E. Mendenhall,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:
April 15, 2005
    By:
    /s/ George E. MendenhallGeorge E. MendenhallChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 463 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2021 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. BRAUN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas stomach cancer, also known as gastric cancer, is one 

of the most difficult cancers to detect in the early stages 

of the disease, which contributes to high mortality rates; 

Whereas stomach cancer occurs when cancer cells develop in 

the lining of the stomach; 

Whereas stomach cancer is the fifth most common type of 

cancer worldwide; 

Whereas, in 2021, an estimated— 

(1) 26,560 cases of stomach cancer will be diagnosed 

in the United States; and 

(2) 11,180 people in the United States will die from 

stomach cancer; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 463 ATS 

Whereas the estimated 5-year survival rate for stomach cancer is only 32.4 percent; 

Whereas, in the United States, stomach cancer is more prevalent among racial and ethnic minorities; 

Whereas increased awareness of, and education about, stomach cancer among patients and health care providers 

could improve timely recognition of stomach cancer symptoms; 

Whereas more research into early diagnosis, screening, and 

treatment for stomach cancer is needed; and 

Whereas November 2021 is an appropriate month to observe 

Stomach Cancer Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals of Stomach Cancer 

3 Awareness Month; 

4 (2) supports efforts to increase awareness of, 

5 and education about, stomach cancer among the 

6 general public of the United States; 

7 (3) recognizes the need for additional research 

8 into early diagnosis, screening, and treatment for 

9 stomach cancer; and 

10 (4) encourages States, territories, and localities 

11 of the United States to support the goals of Stom12 ach Cancer Awareness Month. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7088

MARION EDWARD PEARSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
THE CITY OF MORGANTON, NORTH CAROLINA, sued in their individual capacity; BURKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, POLICY OFFICIAL; JOHN S. SUTTLE, sued in both individual and official capacity; RONNIE HUDSON, sued in both individual and official capacity; KATHY ROBINSON, sued in both individual and official capacity; BRENDA BISSETTE, sued in both individual and official capacity; THE NEWS HERALD, sued in their individual capacity; PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 AND 2; JOHN DOE, Social Worker 1 and 2; CHRISTIAN MCCLITOCK, sued in his individual capacity; GENE BAKER, sued in his individual capacity; ROBERT C. ERVIN, sued in his individual capacity; WAYNE CLONTZ, sued in his individual capacity; JOHN MCDEVITT, sued in both individual and official capacity; GARY DILLINGER, sued in both individual and official capacity; TALTON DARK, sued in both individual and official capacity; STEVE SCHOLEBERLE, sued in both individual and official capacity; B. J. HAMERICK, sued in both individual and official capacity; NORTH CAROLINA S.B.I. CRIME LAB; CLAUDE S. SITTON, Judge; PETER W. HAISTON, judge, sued as official; OLIVER L. NOBLE, Judge, sued as official; BECKY BRENDLE; JULIUS A. ROUSSEAU, JR., Judge, sued as official, Defendants - Appellees.23 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-285-1-02-MU)

Submitted: November 19, 2002 Decided: December 16, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, POYNER & SPRUILL, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We note that we lack jurisdiction over Pearson’s claims relating to the issuance of a nontestimonial identification order (“NIO”) under the Rooker -Feldman doctrine. See Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co. , 263 U.S. 413 (1923); State v. Pearson , 566 S.E.2d 50, 55-61 (N.C. 2002) (finding sufficient evidence to support the issuance of the NIO), petition for cert. filed , (Oct. 16, 2002) (No. 02-7164).

4 PER CURIAM: Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. City of Morganton , No. CA-01-285-1-02-MU (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2002). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Reiyn KEOHANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4127

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 22, 2019

Keith W. Upson of The Upson Law Group, P.L., Naples, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

**Tri-S Security Corporation**

**Summary of Board Compensation**

 

On March 5,2005, the Board of Directors of (the “Board”) of Tri-S Security Corporation(the “Company”) approved the following compensation arrangements:

 

•                  The Companyshall pay each director $10,000 per year for service on the Board plus $2,500per year for each committee of the Board upon which such director serves.

 

•                  The Companyshall reimburse each director for all travel expenses incurred in connectionwith travel to and from Board and committee meetings.

 

----
Bradon Tyron LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1056

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Theodist Tyrone RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-5164

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10415]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

SCR International Freight Forwarding, Inc., 130 Monorca Ave., Coral 
Gables, FL 33134, Officers: Alvaro G. Smith, President, Jose E. 
Smith, Treasurer
AIS Gator Exports, Inc., 201 Springsong Road, Lithia, FL 33547, 
Officers: Henry S. Conrad, Jr., President, Anita P. Conrad, Vice 
President
Sisto International Shipping, 560 Lee Drive, Miami Springs, FL 
33166, Manuel Sisto and Tracy Sisto, Partnership

    By the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10415 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Freddie ROSS, Appellant.

No. 03-2700.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 26, 2004.

Decided May 3, 2004.

Nathan P. Petterson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Freddie Ross, Loretto, PA, pro se.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Freddie Ross appeals the district court’s1 partial denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e)2 motion for return of seized property, which included $8,400 in cash and several non-cash items. We have carefully reviewed the record, and we find no clear error. *See United States v. Felici,*208 F.3d 667, 669-70 (8th Cir.2000) (standard of review), *cert, denied,*581 U.S. 1201, 121 S.Ct. 1209, 149 L.Ed.2d 123 (2001). Police found the $8,400 inside Ross’s girlfriend’s bedroom closet, Ross initially denied any knowledge of the cash, and he later told police the cash belonged to a Vikings football player. In addition, Ross’s attorney conceded during the Rule 41 hearing that the motion was moot with respect to the seized non-cash items.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2

. The substance of former subsection (e) is now found in subsection (g), with stylistic changes. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 41 advisory committee notes (2002 amend.).
#### Narinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70793.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 17, 2004.

Anju Multani, Downey, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Alison Marie Igoe, Paul Fiorino, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Narinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen to seek relief under the Convention Against Torture. We apply the transitional rules under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, and we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). *See Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS,*282 F.3d 1218, 1222-23 (9th Cir.2002). We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the petition in part, and dismiss it in part.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Singh’s motion to reopen because he failed to make a prima facie showing that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured if deported to India. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 208.16(c)(2)(4), 208.18(b)(2); *Cano-Merida, 811*F.3d at 965-66.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Singh’s challenge to the BIA’s initial decision denying his asylum application because he did not timely appeal that decision to this Court. *See Marbinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication arid may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      116823
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              1700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 645301
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       23299
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         29674
<LOANS>                                    1669124
<ALLOWANCE>                                 (30037)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2562067
<DEPOSITS>                                 2068446
<SHORT-TERM>                                243518
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          16672
<LONG-TERM>                                  50000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                   3282
<COMMON>                                      4596
<OTHER-SE>                                  175553
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             2562067
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              66447
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            16258
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              1996
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             84701
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           28853
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           36618
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        48083
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 2480
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               8
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              43375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              17666
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   17666
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 11528
<EPS-BASIC>                                12.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                12.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7
<LOANS-NON>                                   2433
<LOANS-PAST>                                  1113
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              23737
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             28306
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 1509
<RECOVERIES>                                   760
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            30037
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         30037
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      11225


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 35.2

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QH7 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Tagalder Global Investment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Chun Ka Tsun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Chun Ka TsunChun Ka Tsun, Chief Financial Officer May 25, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A. Cloutier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     |  |                      
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|/s/ PAUL A. CLOUTIER                                 |  | Dated: April 26, 2010
|Paul A. Cloutier                                     |  |                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



37
32.2

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the
"Report") filed by AFH Holding III, Inc. (the
"Company") with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I, Amir F. Heshmatpour, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 27, 2008


/s/ Amir F.
Heshmatpour
Amir F. Heshmatpour
Chief Financial
Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to AFH Holding III,
Inc. and will be retained by AFH Holding III, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors6 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer ofthe Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Winston W. J. KAO, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2820

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.