alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Betty Caitlin Nicole SMITH, Petitioner, v. Zachary Taylor DANIEL, Respondent.

No. 1D19-2098

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 19 (Thursday, January 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8525-8526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02046]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, February 13, 2025.

[[Page 8526]]

PLACE: You may observe this meeting in person at 1501 Farm Credit 
Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to 
observe, at least 24 hours in advance, visit FCA.gov, select 
``Newsroom,'' then select ``Events.'' From there, access the linked 
``Instructions for board meeting visitors'' and complete the described 
registration process.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The following matters will be considered:
     Approval of Minutes for January 8, 2025
     Regulatory Burden Final Notice

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: If you need more information or 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley 
Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-
4056.

Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2025-02046 Filed 1-28-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 11, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02474]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator and Foreign 
Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
50LW 8me LLC............................  EG25-24-000
Bluebird Solar LLC......................  EG25-25-000
Seven Flags BESS, LLC...................  EG25-26-000
Tierra Seca BESS, LLC...................  EG25-27-000
Morgnec Road Solar, LLC.................  EG25-28-000
Spring Grove Solar II, LLC..............  EG25-29-000
Cascade Energy Storage II LLC...........  EG25-30-000
Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC...................  EG25-31-000
Richland Township Solar II, LLC.........  EG25-32-000
BCD 2024 Fund 4 II Lessee, LLC..........  EG25-33-000
Enbridge Solar (Orange Grove), LLC......  EG25-34-000
Hecate Energy Frye Solar, LLC...........  EG25-35-000
EdSan 1C Solar, LLC.....................  EG25-36-000
Camino Solar, LLC.......................  EG25-37-000
Scatter Wash Energy Storage LLC.........  EG25-38-000
Bluegrass Solar, LLC....................  EG25-39-000
Burksol LLC.............................  EG25-40-000
Desert Willow Energy Storage, LLC.......  EG25-41-000
Anole Energy Storage, LLC...............  EG25-42-000
Wild Plains Wind Project, LLC...........  EG25-43-000
Northwest Ohio Wind, LLC................  EG25-44-000
Bocanova Power LLC......................  EG25-46-000
GB Arthur Kill Storage LLC..............  EG25-47-000
Pier S Energy Storage LLC...............  EG25-48-000
GC Project LP...........................  FC25-1-000
EniPower S.p.A..........................  FC25-2-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of January 2025, the status of 
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign 
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2024).

    Dated: February 5, 2025.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-02474 Filed 2-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Case 5:17-cr-00058-LHK Document 5 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 1
Eric JACOBS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Michael IVES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1324

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed. Denied. Denied as moot.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM L. Mc VEIGH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

CLIMATE CHANGERS, INC., DBA JW Brower Heating & Air Conditioning; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 35331

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 05174

- RJB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017 **

Before: CANBY, TROTT , and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

William L. McVeigh appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging employment

- related claims . We review for an abuse

of discretion a district court’s dismissal as a sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b).

Malone v. United States Postal Serv.

, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987) . We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35331

affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing McVeigh’s

action because McVeigh failed to comply with the district court’s discovery order s,

and he failed to appear for his deposition

. See id. at 130

- 32 (discussing the five

factors the district court must weigh before dismissing a case for failure to comply

with a court order).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by sanctionin g McVeigh in the

amount of attorney’s fees and costs “caused by [ McVeigh’s ] failure to obey a court

order to provide or permit discovery

. ” Toth v. T r ans World Airlines, Inc. , 862 F.2 d

1381, 1385

- 86 (9th Cir. 1988) (setting forth standard of review and the expenses

the district court may consider in awarding attorney’s fees under Rule 37(b)(2)

( citation and internal quotation marks omitted) ).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by den ying McVeigh’s motion

for reconsideration because McVeigh failed to establish any basis for such relief.

Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262

- 63 (9th

Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for reconsi deration under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)) ; see also W.D. Wash. R. 7(h)(1) (reconsideration will be

“ordinarily den[ied] . . . in the absence of a showing of manifest error in the prior3 17

- 35331

ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have be en

brought to [the district court’s] attention earlier with reasonable diligence

. ”)

.

We reject as without merit McVeigh’s contention that the district court was

biased.

McVeigh’s motion to supplement the record on appeal (Docket Entry No.

20) is denied.

AFFIRMED.
Andre L. ALLEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1573

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL TOTAL TIME (mins):

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MINUTE ORDER

DEPUTY CLERK REPORTER/FTR

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATE NEW CASE CASE NUMBER

APPEARANCES

DEFENDANT AGE CUST P/NP ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT PD. RET.

APPT.

U.S. ATTORNEY INTERPRETER FIN. AFFT

SUBMITTED 

COUNSEL APPT'D 

PROBATION OFFICER PRETRIAL SERVICES OFFICER DEF ELIGIBLE FOR

APPT'D COUNSEL 

PARTIAL PAYMENT 

OF CJA FEES 

PROCEEDINGS SCHEDULED TO OCCUR

INITIAL APPEAR PRELIM HRG MOTION JUGM'T & SENTG STATUS

TRIAL SET 

I.D. COUNSEL ARRAIGNMENT BOND HEARING IA REV PROB. or

 or S/R

OTHER

DETENTION HRG ID / REMOV HRG CHANGE PLEA PROB. REVOC. ATTY APPT 

HEARING

INITIAL APPEARANCE

ADVISED

OF RIGHTS

ADVISED

OF CHARGES

NAME AS CHARGED

IS TRUE NAME

TRUE NAME:

ARRAIGNMENT

ARRAIGNED ON

INFORMATION

ARRAIGNED ON

INDICTMENT

READING WAIVED

SUBSTANCE

WAIVER OF INDICTMENT FILED

RELEASE

RELEASED

ON O/R

ISSUED

APPEARANCE BOND

AMT OF SECURITY SPECIAL NOTES PASSPORT

SURRENDERED

DATE: 

$

PROPERTY TO BE POSTED CORPORATE SECURITY REAL PROPERTY:

CASH $

MOTION

FOR

DETENTION

PRETRIAL

SERVICES

REPORT

DETAINED RELEASED DETENTION HEARING

AND FORMAL FINDINGS

WAIVED

REMANDED

TO CUSTODY

ORDER REMOVED TO THE DISTRICT OF 

PLEA

CONSENT

ENTERED

NOT GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY TO COUNTS:

PRESENTENCE

REPORT ORDERED

CHANGE OF PLEA PLEA AGREEMENT

FILED

OTHER:

CONTINUANCE

 TO: ATTY APPT

HEARING

BOND

HEARING

STATUS RE:

CONSENT TRIAL SET

 AT: SUBMIT FINAN.

AFFIDAVIT

PRELIMINARY

HEARING

_____________

ARRAIGNMENT

CHANGE OF

PLEA

STATUS

BEFORE HON. DETENTION

HEARING

 MOTIONS JUDGMENT &

SENTENCING

TIME WAIVED TIME EXCLUDABLE 

UNDER 18 § USC

3161

IDENTITY /

REMOVAL

HEARING

PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE

PROB/SUP REV.

HEARING

ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS

DOCUMENT NUMBER:

Clear Form 04 Cita F. Escolano 1:38-1:42pm Susan van Keulen 11/8/19 CR 16 00518-BLF Damari Singleton Y P Michael Hinckley Marissa Harris Dkt [111]

Waiver of Potential Conflict Filed and Executed in open court. Representation by CJA Counsel before the district to continue by 

current counsel.
Willie Kevin WILLIAMS v. STATE

CR-16-0484

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

         Our consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of the
periods indicated is set forth below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                 Nine Months
                                             Ended
                                       September 30, 2007                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                         --------------     ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               2006         2005          2004          2003        2002
                                         --------------     ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------  -----------
                                                                                       (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                     <C>                 <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>

FIXED CHARGES:
     Interest costs                       $   10,244        $   13,620   $    6,766   $    6,711    $    4,692    $    5,942
     Capitalized interest                         --                --           --          260         1,558            --
                                          -------------     ----------   ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------
         Total fixed charges              $   10,244        $   13,620   $    6,766        6,971         6,250         5,942
                                          =============     ==========   ==========   ==========    ==========    ==========

EARNINGS:
     Net income                           $   12,343        $   21,464   $   21,913   $   20,351    $    5,913    $    5,769
     Add fixed charges per above              10,244            13,620        6,766        6,971         6,250         5,942
     Less capitalized interest per above          --                --           --         (260)       (1,558)           --
                                          -------------     ----------   ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------
         Total earnings, as adjusted      $   22,587        $   35,084   $   28,679   $   27,062    $   10,605    $   11,711
                                          =============     ==========   ==========   ==========    ==========    ==========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES              2.20              2.58         4.24         3.88          1.70          1.97
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10199

(Summary Calendar)

 

MILTON EDWARD GRIGGS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOBBY YOUNG, Sheriff of Hunt County, Et Al.

Defendants,

DOUG TOMLINSON, Sgt., Hunt County Jail,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(USDC No. 3:94-CV-2177-P)

- - - - - - - - - -

July 25, 1996

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Milton Griggs, #558133, appeals from the district court’s

order granting summary judgment in favor of Sergeant Doug Tomlinson

in Griggs’ civil rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. Griggs argues that Tomlinson used excessive force in

moving him from his jail cell. We have reviewed the record and the
2

briefs of the parties and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment for

essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. See

Griggs v. Young et al., No. 3:94-CV-2177-P (N.D. Tex. Jan. 31,

1996).

AFFIRMED.
Opinion filed June 5 , 2015



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _____



### No. 11

- 1 4

- 00 200

- C V

_____ _ _____



### OMEGA PRESTON

, Appellant

V.

SANDRA HODGE

, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Ector County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. 21609

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A ppellan t

, Omega Preston

, ha s filed in this court a m otion for dismis s al and

nonsuit

. In the motion, Appellant requests that this “cause be dismiss ed with

prejudice.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a)(1)

. Appellant has certified that Appellee

does not oppose the motion.

The motion is granted, and th e appeal is dismissed

.

June 5, 2015 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J., and Bailey , J.
M.J.C., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Robert W. KELLEY

CR-17-0422

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
# C_2018216EN.01000101.xml

| 20.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 June 2018

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2018

(2018/C 216/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2018 was definitively adopted on 30 November 2017 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2018 was definitively adopted on 30 November 2017 (2),

2

| — | on 13 April 2018, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2018, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 13 April 2018, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2018,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2018 was adopted on 18 June 2018.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Luxembourg, 18 June 2018.

For the Council

The President

R. PORODZANOV

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 57, 28.2.2018, p. 1.

2

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 20, 2015

p0317

Order 

Clerk

March 20, 2015

151062

SC: 151062

In re BEELER/HALL, Minors. COA: 321648

Genesee CC Family Division:

12-128963-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Amendment to the Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.32 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 SYNNEX CORPORATION 
 2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 In accordance with Section 16(b) of the SYNNEX
Corporation 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. Section 4(b)(ii)
of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows, effective on the date hereof: 
 “(b)(ii) On the
first business day following the conclusion of each regular annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders after such Outside Director’s appointment or election to the Board of Directors, commencing with the annual meeting occurring after
November 21, 2008, each Outside Director who will continue serving as a member of the Board of Directors thereafter shall receive 2,000 Restricted Shares (subject to adjustment under Section 11), provided such Outside Director has served
on the Board of Directors for at least six months; provided, further, if the first business day following the conclusion of the regular annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders after such Outside Director’s appointment or election to
the Board of Directors falls within a trading black-out period, then the grant date for Restricted Shares granted pursuant to this section shall be upon the expiration of the third trading day after the trading black-out period ends.”

 2. Section 4(b)(iv) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirely as follows, effective on the date hereof: 

“(b)(iv)(A) With respect to Options granted to Outside Directors under this Section 4(b) after January 4, 2007,
one-third (1/3) of the Shares subject to each Option shall vest and become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and the balance of the Shares subject to each Option (i.e., the remaining two-thirds (2/3)) shall vest
and become exercisable monthly over a two-year period beginning on the day which is one month after the first anniversary of the date of grant; and (B) with respect to Restricted Shares awarded to Outside Directors under this Section 4(b)
after November 21, 2008, one-quarter (1/4) of the Restricted Shares shall vest on the last day of each fiscal quarter following the date of grant over a one-year period.” 







 To record the amendment of the Plan, SYNNEX Corporation has executed this document this 21st day of
November, 2008. 
  

			
	SYNNEX CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/    Simon Y. Leung

	Title:	 	General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Case No. C05-01939-JF-PVT

Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575)

CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.

12 South First Street, Suite 416

San Jose, California 95113-2404

Telephone Number: (408) 294-6100

Facsimile Number: (408) 294-6190

Email Address: fred.schwinn@sjconsumerlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

KELU NDUNGE MAUNDU

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KELU NDUNGE MAUNDU,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHARON LYNN BARNES,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-01939-JF-PVT

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

This action came on for hearing before the Court, Honorable Jeremy Fogel, District Judge,

presiding, and the issues having been duly heard and a decision having been duly rendered,

It is Ordered and Adjudged that the plaintiff, KELU NDUNGE MAUNDU, recover against

defendant, SHARON LYNN BARNES, the sum of $8,649.44, together with interest thereon at the

judgment rate until paid. Said judgment amount represents $1,000.00 in statutory damages awarded

pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(2)(A) and $7,649.44 in attorney fees and costs awarded pursuant

to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this ________ day of June, 2006.

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

Judge of the District Court

**E-filed 7/14/06** 14th

Case 5:05-cv-01939-JF Document 31 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 1
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

, hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

APPLICANT 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Reset Form

MITZIE PEREZ, et al. 17 Civ. 454

WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS

FARGO, N.A.,

Patrick David Lopez

Patrick David Lopez

Patrick David Lopez

District of Columbia

Plaintiffs

Jahan C. Sagafi

601 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Second Floor 

West Suite, Washington D.C., 20001

One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

(202) 847-4400 (415) 638-8800

pdl@outtengolden.com jsagafi@outtengolden.com

426463

02/08/17

2/13/2017

Case 3:17-cv-00454-MMC Document 20 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:17-cv-00454-MMC Document 20 Filed 02/13/17 Page 2 of 2