26054 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 94 / Tuesday, May 16, 1995 / Notices

responsible manufacture of controlled

substances in accordance with its

previous manufacturing registration.

Additionally, Johnson Matthey has

addressed and corrected prior regulatory

discrepancies in a timely manner,

demonstrating the commitment required

of a DEA registrant.

Finally, concerning the administrative

law judge’s recommendation with

respect to duplicative mandated hearing

provisions, the Deputy Administrator

disagrees with Judge Bittner’s

conclusion in this proceeding that the

requirement of an order to show cause,

pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(c), comprises

simply a ‘‘notice provision.’’ Rather, the

Deputy Administrator finds that, as

currently written, the statute mandates

that the Government issue an order to

show cause whenever it seeks to deny

or revoke a DEA Certificate of

Registration. The Deputy Administrator

acknowledges that, in some cases, this

may subject an applicant to multiple

hearings. however, whether the

Government would be estopped from

raising issues at a show cause hearing

subsequent to a ‘‘third-party hearing’’

would depend on whether the issues

were actually litigated and determined.

In any event, this decision could only be

determined on a case-by-case basis. The

Deputy Administrator also notes, as

provided in the regulations, that

hearings conducted pursuant to an order

to show cause may be consolidated with

a hearing requested by a third-party. 21

CFR 1301.43(a). The Deputy

Administrator encourages that parties to

these type of proceedings consolidate

these hearings whenever possible.

The Deputy Administrator hereby

adopts the administrative law judge’s

findings of fact and conclusions of law,

except as previously noted.

Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator

of the Drugs Enforcement

Administration, pursuant to the

authority vested in him by 21 U.S.C. 823

and 824 and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104,

hereby orders that the application of

Johnson Matthey, Inc. for registration as

a bulk manufacturer of

methylphenidate, be, and it hereby is,

approved subject to the requirements

enumerated by the administrative law

judge.

Dated: May 8, 1995.

Stephen H. Greene,

Deputy Administrator.

[FR Doc. 95–11934 Filed 5–15–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. FEDERAL

HOLIDAY COMMISSION

Meeting

AGENCY: Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal

Holiday Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Federal Advisory Act, Public Law 92–

463, as amended, the Martin Luther

King, Jr. Federal Holiday Commission

announces a forthcoming meeting of the

Commission.

DATE: May 23, 1995.

TIME: 12:30 p.m.–3:30 p.m.

LOCATION: U.S. House of

Representatives, O’Neill Building,

House Annex 1, Room 116, Washington,

D.C. The public is invited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Valerie Pinkney, Executive Officer,

Washington Office (202) 708–1005.

Dated: May 10, 1995.

Valerie Pinkney,

Executive Officer.

[FR Doc. 94–12021 Filed 5–15–94; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210–01–M

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Institute of Museum Services

Information Collection Submitted to

OMB for Review

AGENCY: Institute of Museum Services.

ACTION: Notice of information submitted

to OMB for review.

SUMMARY: The Institute of Museum

Services (IMS) is submitting an

information collection for review by the

Office of Management and Budget under

the Paperwork Reduction Act. The

collection is entitled ‘‘US. Museums on

the Internet 1995—A Survey for the

Institute of Museum Services.’’ IMS has

requested that review be completed by

May 19, 1995.

IMS recently established a connection

to the Internet. We would like to

enhance our service to the museum

community by providing IMS

information through the Internet.

Currently, no body of data exists to

determine how many museums have

Internet connections or, if they do, what

level of service museums have.

Therefore, we propose to survey the

museum community on a voluntaryresponse basis with a brief

questionnaire to ask museums to give us

the information we need to know to be

able to provide information most

efficiently. IMS distribution plan for the

survey will assure a broad collection of

data. A statistical analysis is not

warranted due to the cost of such

analysis and the limited usefulness of

this data collect which, due to the

rapidly changing use of the Internet,

will become obsolete.

For this collection, the estimated

average burden hours is .05 and the

frequency of response is once. The

number of respondents is 1000.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Mr.

Dan Chenok, Office of Information and

Regulatory Affairs, Office of

Management and Budget, Room 3002

NEOB, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Submit requests for more information,

including copies of the proposed

collection of information and

supporting documentation, to IMS

Internet Policy Committee, Institute of

Museum Services, Room 609, 1100

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,

DC 20506.

Diane Frankel,

Director, Institute of Museum Services.

[FR Doc. 95–11953 Filed 5–15–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7036–01–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 999–90004 Texas License No.

L04153 EA 95–007]

IHS Geotech & CMT, Inc., San Antonio,

Texas; Order Imposing Civil Monetary

Penalty

I

IHS Geotech & CMT, Inc., (Licensee)

is the holder of Texas Radioactive

Material License L04153 issued by the

Texas Bureau of Radiation Control. The

license authorizes the Licensee to

possess and use sealed sources of

various radioisotopes in moisture/

density gauges at temporary job sites

throughout Texas, except in areas under

exclusive federal jurisdiction. In areas of

exclusive federal jurisdiction, these

activities can only be conducted

pursuant to an NRC specific or general

license.

II

An inspection of the Licensee’s

activities in areas under exclusive

federal jurisdiction, i.e., certain military

installations located in Texas, was

conducted December 16, 1994 to

January 12, 1995. The results of this

inspection indicated that the Licensee

had not conducted its activities in full

compliance with NRC requirements. A

written Notice of Violation and