Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 1995 / Notices 20763

certification to include workers at

Commerce, California.

The amended notice applicable to

NAFTA—00307 is hereby issued as

follows:

‘‘All workers and former workers of H.

Grabell & Sons, Inc., Paterson, New Jersey

and Commerce, California who became

totally or partially separated from

employment on or after December 8, 1993 are

eligible to apply for NAFTA–TAA under

Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of

April 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–10357 Filed 4–26–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–37–M

Footwear Management Co.; Amended

Certification Regarding Eligibility To

Apply for NAFTA Transitional

Adjustment Assistance

In the matter of: NAFTA–00252 Tony Lama

Division, El Paso, Texas, a/k/a Justin

Management Company, El Paso, Texas,

NAFTA–00252A Justin Boot Company, Fort

Worth, Texas, NAFTA–00252B Justin Boot

Company, Cassville, Missouri, NAFTA–

00252C Nocona Boot Company, Nocona,

Texas, NAFTA–00252D Justin Boot

Company, Sarcoxie, Missouri and NAFTA–

00252E Justin Boot Company, Carthage,

Missouri.

In accordance with Section 250(a),

Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19

U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor

issued an Amended Certification for

NAFTA Transitional Adjustment

Assistance on February 6, 1995,

applicable to all workers at the subject

firm. The amended notice was

published in the Federal Register on

February 17, 1995 (60 FR 9409).

The certification was subsequently

amended April 6, 1995. The notice will

soon be published in the Federal

Register. The NAFTA reference

numbers in the amendment were

incorrect.

Accordingly, the Department is

amending the certification to properly

reflect this matter.

The amended notice applicable to

NAFTA—00252 is hereby issued as

follows:

‘‘All workers of Footwear Management

Company in the following divisions: Tony

Lama Division, El Paso, Texas, a/k/a Justin

Management Company, El Paso, Texas; Justin

Boot Company, Fort Worth, Texas; Cassville,

Missouri; Sarcoxie, Missouri; and Carthage,

Missouri and the Nocona Boot Company in

Nocona, Texas who became totally or

partially separated from employment on or

after November 29, 1993 are eligible to apply

for NAFTA–TAA Section 250 of the Trade

Act of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of

April 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of April 1995.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations to the firm.

TA–W–30,690; Pennzoil Products Co.,

Roosevelt Utah Refinery, Roosevelt,

UT

TA–W–30,688; Union Camp Corp.,

Retail Packaging of the Flexible

Packaging Div., Savannah, GA

TA–W–30,703; Dauman Display, Inc.,

New York, NY

TA–W–30,813; Unisys, Government

Systems Group, Great Neck, NY

TA–W–30,756; CMS Gilbreth Packing

Systems, Kingston, PA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–30,833; Simon Petroleum

Technology Corp., Houston, TX

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

TA–W–30,801; Gregory Rig Sales &

Service, Inc., Odessa, TX

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

TA–W–30,893; General Motors Corp.,

Service Parts Operations, Reno

Parts Distribution Center, Sparks,

NV

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

TA–W–30,739; Control Power, Inc.,

Ardmore, OK

A company decision to close the

Ardmore plant and transfer production

to another domestic plant in Midland,

TX. Sales had been increasing prior to

this transfer of production.

TA–W–30,843; Print and Peel, Paterson,

NJ

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–30,840; General Mills, Inc., South

Chicago, IL

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

TA–W–30,835; United Defense, L.P.

(FMC/BMY), Aberdeen, SD

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–30,714; Endicott Forgings &

Manufacturing Co., Inc., Endicott,

NY

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–30,828; Greenville Industries,

Inc., Greenville, TN

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–30,887; Texaco Refining &

Marketing, Inc., Bellaire, TX

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–30,780; Rhone Paulenc Silicones

VSI, Troy, NY

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.
20764 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 1995 / Notices

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

TA–W–30,751; Fashion Button, New

York, NY

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

10, 1994.

TA–W–30,743, TA–W–30,761; Transport

Manufacturing Corp., Rosell, NM,

Motor Coach Industries, Int’l,

Rosewell, NM

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

3, 1994.

TA–W–30,930; Sun Apparel Inc.,

Concepcion Plant, El Paso, TX

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after April 3,

1994.

TA–W–30,871; Exxon Production

Research Co., Houston, TX

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 20,

1994.

TA–W–30,825, A & B; Red Eagle

Resource Corp., Oklahoma City,

OK, Cimarron Operating Co.,

Fairview, OK, Talon Trucking Co.,

Fairview, OK

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after June 12,

1994.

TA–W–30,790; C.H. Todd, Inc., Wichita,

KS

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

6, 1994.

TA–W–30,818; Philips Technology—

Airpax, Inc., Cambridge, MD

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

18, 1995.

TA–W–30,841; Highland Yarn Mills,

Inc., High Point, NC

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

21, 1994.

TA–W–30,711; Avenue West Sportsear,

Hammonton, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January 9,

1994.

TA–W–30,750; Berkeley Belt, Inc., New

York, NY

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

10, 1994.

TA–W–30,855; Brown Shoe Co.,

Fredericktown, MO

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 13,

1994.

TA–W–30,768; Kelley Oil Corp.,

Houston, TX & Operating at

Various Locations in the Following

States: A; NY, B; LA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

7, 1994.

TA–W–30,888; Rogge Affiliates, Inc.,

Bandon, OR

TA–W–30,888A; Douglas Pacific Veneer,

Inc., Bandon, OR

TA–W–30,888B; Rogge Forest Products,

Inc., Bandon, OR

TA–W–30, 888C; Rogge Wood Products,

Inc., Wallowa, OR

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 16,

1994.

TA–W–30,895; Lar Sportswear Co.,

Palmerton, PA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 25,

1994.

TA–W–30,741; Boeing of Portland,

Portland, OR

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

2, 1994.

TA–W–30,718; ‘‘Q–T’’ Foundations Co.,

Inc., Bergenfield, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

16, 1995.

TA–W–30,752; Visador Co., Tacoma,

WA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

7, 1994.

TA–W–30,706; Xerox Corp., Document

Production Systems Div., Rochester,

NY

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January

18, 1994.

TA–W–30,765 & TA–W–30,766; Dexter

Shoe Co., Dexter, ME and Newport,

ME

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

10, 1994.

TA–W–30,726; Goldex, Inc., Goldsboro,

NC

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January

30, 1994.

TA–W–30,773; Blanche, Inc., dba GBS

Corp., Blue Ball, PA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

14, 1994.

TA–W–30,849; Voyager Emblems, Inc.,

Sanforn, NY

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 6,

1994.

TA–W–30,782; Perry Manufacturing Co.,

Elk Creek, VA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

27, 1994.

TA–W–30,728 & A; Waco Oil and Gas

Co., Glenville, WV & Operating at

Various Locations in the State of

West Virginia

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

3, 1994.

TA–W–30,796; TTC, Inc., Kankakee, IL

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

8, 1994.

TA–W–30,875; Val Mode Lingerie, Inc.,

Bridgeton, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 17,

1994.

TA–W–30,789; Schweiger Industries,

Inc., Jefferson, WI

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

17, 1994.

TA–W–30,800; Penn-Union Corp

(Formerly Teledyne Penn-Union),

Edinboro, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

22, 1994.

TA–W–30,792; Pennzoil Products Co

(Oil and Gas Segment) Bradford

District, Bradford, PA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

2, 1994.

TA–W–30,781; Names, Inc., Allentown,

PA

A certification was issued covering all

workers of Names, Inc., Allentown, PA

separated on or after January 16, 1994.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (P.L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment assistance

hereinafter called (NAFTA–TAA) and in

accordance with Section 250(a) Subchapter

D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act as

amended, the Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA issued

during the months of April, 1995.

In order for an affirmative determination to

be made and a certification of eligibility to

apply for NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250 of the

Trade Act must be met:

(1) That a significant number or proportion

of the workers in the workers’ firm, or an

appropriate subdivision thereof, (including

workers in any agricultural firm or

appropriate subdivision thereof) have

become totally or partially separated from

employment and either—
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 1995 / Notices 20765

(A) That sales or production, or both, of

such firm or subdivision have decreased

absolutely,

(B) That imports from Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by such firm or subdivision

have increased,

(C) That the increase in imports

contributed importantly to such workers’

separations or threat of separation and to the

decline in sales or production of such firm

or subdivision; or

(2) That there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of articles

like or directly competitive with articles

which are produced by the firm or

subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

NAFTA–TAA–00374; Boeing of

Portland, Portland, OR

The investigation revealed that

criteria (3) and (4) were not met. There

was no shift of production from Boeing

of Portland to Mexico or Canada during

the period under investigation, neither

did Boeing of Portland import from

Mexico or Canada any articles like or

directly competitive with aircraft parts

manufactured at the Portland facility.

NAFTA–TAA–00375; Schweiger

Industries, Inc., Jefferson Furniture

Manufacturing Facility, Jefferson,

WI

The investigation revealed that

criteria (3) and (4) were not met.

Surveys conducted with customers

revealed an increase in purchases from

domestic firms and that they do not

import a significant proportion of

upholstered furniture from Canada or

Mexico.

NAFTA–TAA–00377; DLCI USA, Van

Buren, ME

The investigation revealed that

criteria (3) and (4) were not met. The

investigation findings revealed that

DLCI USA has not shifted production of

bicycle frames and parts from the Van

Buren, ME facility to Canada or Mexico.

Also disclosed was that all the plant’s

production was shipped to the parent

company located in France. Lost export

sales cannot be used as the basis for

certification under the Trade Act of

1974.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–00397; Plastmo, Inc.,

Creswell, OR

A certification was issued covering all

workers at Plastmo, Inc., Creswell, OR

separated on or after March 2, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00378; AMSCO

International, Inc., Wilson, NY

A certification was issued covering all

workers at AMSCO International, Inc.,

Wilson, NY separated on or after

February 24, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00395; Paul-son Gaming

Supplies, Inc., Las Vegas, NV

A certification was issued covering all

workers at Paul-son Gaming Supplies,

Inc., Las Vegas, NV separated on or after

March 13, 1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00394; Modoc Lumber

Co., Klamath Falls, OR

A certification was issued covering all

workers of Modoc Lumber Co., Klamath

Falls, OR separated on or after March 6,

1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00379 & A; I. Appel Corp,

Forfit Rogers, McMinnville, TN and

Lafayette, TN

A certification was issued covering all

workers of I. Appel Corp., Formit Rogers

facilities in McMinnville and Lafayette,

TN separated on or after February 27,

1994.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the months of April, 1995.

Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

DC 20210 during normal business hours

or will be mailed to persons who write

to the above address.

Dated: April 19, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo

Program Manager, Policy & Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–10361 Filed 4–26–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Bureau of Labor Statistics

Labor Research Advisory Council;

Notice of Meetings and Agenda

The Spring meetings of committees of

the Labor Research Advisory Council

will be held on May 16, 17 and 18. All

of the meetings will be held in the

Conference Center of the Postal Square

Building (PSB), 2 Massachusetts

Avenue, N.E., Washington, D.C.

The Labor Research Advisory Council

and its committees advise the Bureau of

Labor Statistics with respect to technical

matters associated with the Bureau’s

programs. Membership consists of

union research directors and staff

members. The schedule and agenda of

the meetings are as follows:

Tuesday, May 16, 1995

9:30 a.m.—Committee on Employment and

Unemployment Statistics—Meeting Room 2

1. Status reports

a. BLS Budget

b. Contingent Worker Survey

c. Revision of the Standard Industrial

Classification

d. Revision of the Standard Occupational

Classification

2. Discussion:

a. Development of a National Wage Record

Database

b. Restart of the Mass Layoff Statistics

Program

c. American Statistical Association

recommendations for improvement of

the CES and 202 programs

d. Labor Market Information report

e. Current Population Survey—lessons

learned

3. Presentation: understanding recent trends

in labor force participation

1:30 p.m.—Committee on Prices and Living

Conditions—Meeting Room 2

1. Current Consumer Price Index (CPI) issues

and plans

2. Other business

Wednesday, May 17, 1995

9:30–3:00 p.m.—Committee on Occupational

Safety and Health Statistics—Meeting Room

2

1. 1992 and 1993 Bulletins for the Survey of

Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

2. User access to data from the Survey of

Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

3. The demographics of injured/ill workers

and the circumstances of their injuries

and illnesses as reported in the 1993

Survey

4. Survey of Employer-Provided Training

5. Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA) recordkeeping

plans

6. Budget/Appropriations

1:30 p.m.—Committee on Wages and

Industrial Relations—Meeting Rooms 9 and

10

1. An initiative to redesign compensation

statistics

2. Current and future changes to the

Occupational Compensation Survey

Program (OCSP) job list

3. The recent Employee Benefits Survey

bulletin: a general overview

4. Surveys of Employer-Provided Training:

An update

5. Other business

Thursday, May 18, 1995

1:00 p.m.—Committee on Foreign Labor

Statistics—Meeting Room 2

1. Review of recent development in the

Office of Productivity and Technology

2. Chartbook on international labor statistics

comparisons

Committee on Productivity, Technology and

Growth—Meeting Room 2

1. New index number method for industry

labor productivity data

2. New index number method for major

sector labor productivity data

3. Other business

The meetings are open to the public.

Persons planning to attend these meetings as

observers may want to contact Wilhelmina

Abner on (Area Code 202) 606–5970.