alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 99.5


I, Dr. Luke Zhang, certify that: 1.
     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of GLG Life Tech Corporation;2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
     The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:a)
     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
     Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
     Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures; as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
     Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and5.
     The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 31, 2011 /s/ Luke Zhang
Dr. Luke Zhang 
Chief Executive Officer


---
EXHIBIT32.1

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 16, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Leo Shi Young                     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Leo      Shi Young                         |   |
|                       |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
Order entered June 23 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00746 - CV IN RE WILLIE ATKINS, Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W069 - 00566 - X( A)



### O RDER Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Evans and Whitehill Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Abby Gail GARCIA v. CITY OF NATCHITOCHES, et al.

NO. 2019-C-0516

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification







Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Xinyinhai Technology,
Ltd. (the “Company”) certify that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







November
      16, 2009
            /s/ Tian
      LingTian
      Ling (Chief Executive Officer)/s/ Du
      SongDu
      Song (Chief Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          54,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    172,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               678,412
<PP&E>                                         822,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                 767,422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,748,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,080,196
<BONDS>                                        128,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,655
<OTHER-SE>                                     442,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,748,422
<SALES>                                        685,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               685,829
<CGS>                                          626,853
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,069,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (410,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (411,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (411,481)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen T. McGowan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/    STEPHEN T.
MCGOWANName:

Stephen T. McGowanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.1

                                   RESOLUTIONS

      RESOLVED, that in payment for legal services provided to the Company by
Bruce J. Lurie from April 1, 2002 through August 6, 2003, the Company grants
450,000 shares of the Company's common stock to be registered in a registration
statement on Form S-8 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC") promptly after the Company becomes current in all of its filing
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

      RESOLVED, that in payment for legal services provided to the Company by
Myles J. Tralins from April 1, 2002 through August 6, 2003, the Company grants
450,000 shares of the Company's common stock to be registered in a registration
statement on Form S-8 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC") promptly after the Company becomes current in all of its filing
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act").

      Dated: August 8, 2003
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40124

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BUOKAI SONSING PEELER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-17-1

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Buokai Sonsing Peeler has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Peeler has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

The record does reveal a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment

reflects that Peeler was assessed a $200 fine. However, the district court

actually ordered Peeler to pay $200 in restitution.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 3, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-40124 Document: 00511019240 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2010
No. 09-40124

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for correction

of the clerical error pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.

Case: 09-40124 Document: 00511019240 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2010
Aaron QUARLES v. STATE

CR-16-1118

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clayton HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-40516.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 19, 2004.

*183Tracey M. Batson, Assistant US Attorney, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roger C. Diseker, Kelly, Hart & Hall-man, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.1

Clayton Harris, whose actual name is Clyde Bates, appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute five or more kilograms of cocaine. *See*21 U.S.C. § 841. His argument that the district court clearly erred in increasing his offense level for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 is without merit. In addition to other instances, Bates used the Harris alias when he appeared before the magistrate judge for his detention hearing. The two-level adjustment was therefore appropriate. U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, comment. (n.4(f)); *United States v. McDonald,*964 F.2d 390, 392-93 (5th Cir. 1992).

There is no merit in Bates’ argument that the district court should have awarded him a three-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Although Bates entered a plea of guilty prior to the commencement of trial, his failure to reveal the source of the narcotics or how they got into the car was construed by the court either as a failure to admit the conduct comprising the offense of conviction or as a false denial of relevant conduct (i.e., denial of knowledge that others hid the narcotics in the car). See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.3). The court’s reliance on the PSR for this determination was not error. *United States v. Brown,*54 F.3d 234, 242 (5th Cir.1995). Moreover, the two-level adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 indicates that Bates was not entitled to a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment, (n.4).

Bates’ argument that the district court erred in not awarding him a “safety valve” reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 is without merit. The district was free to adopt the PSR’s conclusion that Bates did not provide information regarding the source of the cocaine or how it got into the vehicle but instead denied any knowledge of such facts. *See Brown,*54 F.3d at 242. He was therefore disqualified by § 501.2(a)(5) from receiving a safety valve reduction.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
|     1. | Such Annual Report      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and                                                         |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|     2. | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Revolutions Medical      Corporation. |

|                                        |   |                                                             |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      March 16, 2010    | By:    | /s/      Rondald L.      Wheet                                   |   |
|                                        |   | Rondald      L. Wheet                                            |   |
|                                        |   | Chief      Executive OfficerRevolutions      Medical Corporation |   |
|                                        |   |                                                             |   |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 21001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10214]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development
[Docket No. N-95-1917; FR-3778-N-34]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability four possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1995.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact David Pollack, Department 
of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7254, 451 Seventh Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1226; TDD number for the 
hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone number are 
not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-
800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.) HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no aditional properties have been determined 
suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: April 21, 1995.
Jacquie M. Lawing,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 95-10214 Filed 4-27-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
# L_2018137EN.01002501.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 137/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 137/25

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2018/819

of 1 June 2018

implementing Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 of 27 May 2016 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Decision 2013/183/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 33(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 May 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 May 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849.

| (2) | On 23 May 2018, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1718 (2006) amended the listing of an entity subject to restrictive measures. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 23 May 2018, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1718 (2006) amended the listing of an entity subject to restrictive measures.

| (3) | Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 June 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. ZAHARIEVA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849, entry 74 under the heading ‘B. Entities’ is replaced by the following:

| ‘74. | WEIHAI WORLD-SHIPPING FREIGHT | | 419-201, Tongyi Lu, Huancui Qu, Weihai, Shandong 264200, China | 30.3.2018 | Ship and commercial manager of the XIN GUANG HAI, a vessel that on loaded coal at Taean, DPRK on October 27, 2017 and had an ETA of November 14, 2017 to Cam Pha, Vietnam, but it did not arrive.’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘74.

WEIHAI WORLD-SHIPPING FREIGHT

419-201, Tongyi Lu, Huancui Qu, Weihai, Shandong 264200, China

30.3.2018

Ship and commercial manager of the XIN GUANG HAI, a vessel that on loaded coal at Taean, DPRK on October 27, 2017 and had an ETA of November 14, 2017 to Cam Pha, Vietnam, but it did not arrive.’

---
Aurelio OCANA GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0136

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                         460,745
<SECURITIES>                                   203,210
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,295,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    461,842
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,852,835
<PP&E>                                       1,356,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                 793,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,622,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,433,220
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,120,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,622,402
<SALES>                                      1,859,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,859,019
<CGS>                                          972,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,683,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                181,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            123,390
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,390
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Company affected a two for one split on November 18, 1996. Earnings per
share has been restated to reflect this split for only the quarter ended
September 30, 1996 in conjunction with the adoption of FAS 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>