alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

# **Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty Trust, sole general partner ofVornado Realty L.P. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report onForm 10-K for year ended December 31, 2011**(the “Report”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

|          |   |   |
|---------------|--------|--------|
| March 2, 2012 |   |   | /s/ Michael D. Fascitelli |
|          |   | Name:  | Michael D. Fascitelli |
|          |   | Title: | President and Chief Executive  Officer of Vornado Realty Trust, sole general partner of Vornado Realty L.P. |
|          |   |   |   |   |
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey
      Markin ,
      as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Jeffrey
                MarkinJeffrey
                      Markin
                    President
                      and Chief Executive Officer
                    November
                      13, 2007
  This
        Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
        purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         160,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    172,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               671,976
<PP&E>                                         822,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                 777,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,732,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,108,370
<BONDS>                                        115,908
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,566
<OTHER-SE>                                     443,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,732,190
<SALES>                                        717,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               717,952
<CGS>                                          711,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,362,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (679,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (680,271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (680,271)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Chartwell International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dr. Janice Jones,the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my
knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: November 13, 2002                         /s/ Janice A. Jones
       -----------------                         -----------------------------
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 13, 2002                         /s/ Janice A. Jones
       -----------------                         -----------------------------
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART LENOVO AND MOTOROLA'S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART LENOVO AND 

MOTOROLA'S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1339

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Lenovo and Motorola’s

motion to seal as follows. By Friday, January 18, 2019, at 5:00 p.m., Lenovo and Motorola shall 

refile a redacted public version of the below documents consistent with the Court’s sealing rulings.

For QX2459, Lenovo and Motorola’s motion and this order use the PowerPoint’s actual 

pagination.

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX2459 QX2459 from page 5 to 6 GRANTED.

QX2459 QX2459 page 7 DENIED.

QX2459 QX2459 page 8 to 9 GRANTED.

QX2459 QX2459 page 10 Chart in the top left

GRANTED as to the amounts in the spending column and 

spending share column. DENIED as to the companies in 

the category and vendor list.

Graph in top right

GRANTED.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1343 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART LENOVO AND MOTOROLA'S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

Summary in bottom half of page

GRANTED as to the percentage of procurement spending 

in the first bullet. DENIED as to the remainder of the 

Summary.

QX9266 Q2014FTC03100365 to

Q2014FTC03100367

GRANTED.

QX9266 Q2014FTC03100371 to

Q2014FTC03100372

GRANTED.

QX9266 Q2014FTC03100400 GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1343 Filed 01/17/19 Page 2 of 2
# C_2019111EN.01006001.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/60

---

Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) for the financial year 2018

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 108 of 22.3.2018
  )

(2019/C 111/16)

On page 149, in column ‘Appropriations 2017’:

| — | row ‘Chapter 2 0’: |
| --- | --- |

—

row ‘Chapter 2 0’:

for:

‘2 379 181’,

read:

read:

‘2 369 181’.

| — | row ‘Title 2 — Total’: |
| --- | --- |

—

row ‘Title 2 — Total’:

for:

for:

‘3 362 666’,

read:

read:

‘3 352 666’.

| — | row ‘Chapter 3 2’: |
| --- | --- |

—

row ‘Chapter 3 2’:

for:

for:

‘3 771 381’,

read:

read:

‘3 771 380’.

| — | row ‘Title 3 — Total’: |
| --- | --- |

—

row ‘Title 3 — Total’:

for:

for:

‘4 774 144’,

read:

read:

‘4 774 143’.

| — | row ‘GRAND TOTAL’: |
| --- | --- |

—

row ‘GRAND TOTAL’:

for:

for:

‘24 009 257’,

read:

read:

‘23 999 256’.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE ROE 1, JANE ROE 2, JOHN DOE 1,

and JOHN DOE 2, on behalf of themselves 

and others similarly situated, and JEWISH 

FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 

EAST BAY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DONALD TRUMP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00557-WHO 

ORDER STAYING CASE AND 

VACATING HEARING

On December 23, 2017, the Honorable James L. Robart of the Western District of 

Washington enjoined on a nationwide basis certain aspects of Executive Order No. 13,815 (“EO4”), § 3(a), 82 Fed. Reg. 50,055 (Oct. 27, 2017), and its accompanying Memorandum. See JOHN 

DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants. JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES, et 

al., Plaintiffs, 2017 WL 6551491 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 23, 2017). As a result, plaintiffs here

concede that they “do not currently face irreparable injury from EO-4 and the accompanying 

Memorandum.” Reply ISO Pls.’ Mot. for Prelim. Injunction at 1 (Dkt. No. 90[under seal]). Given 

this concession and the current nationwide injunction, it makes little sense to consider plaintiffs’ 

motion for a preliminary injunction at this time. Accordingly, the hearing set for January 17, 2018 

is VACATED and this matter is STAYED. Either side may seek to lift the stay and reset the 

hearing if changed circumstances warrant such action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2018

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00557-WHO Document 91 Filed 01/08/18 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7853

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN A. WAUGH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-30-A, CA-96-1529-AM)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin A. Waugh, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn Cameron Alexander, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Waugh, Nos. CR-95-30-A; CA-96-1529-AM (E.D.

Va. Oct. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) of China Digital Ventures Corporation (the “Company”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.





Date: December 31, 2010  /s/ Robert M. PriceRobert M. Price

Chief Executive Officer

Interim Chief Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER REINSTATING ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS AND GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY

Appellate case name: In re The State of Texas Ex Rel. Brian W. Wice

Appellate case numbers: 01-20-00477-CR; 01-20-00478-CR; 01-20-00479-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1555100, 1555101, 1555102

Trial court: 185th District Court of Harris County

On June 30, 2020, relator Brian W. Wice filed a petition for writ of mandamus: (1) 

challenging a June 25, 2020 order signed by the Honorable Robert Johnson, Presiding Judge of 

the 177th District Court of Harris County, vacating a change of venue order in the underlying cases 

and returning venue of the cases to Collin County; and (2) compelling rulings on certain motions.

On July 7, 2002, our Court issued an order staying enforcement of Judge Johnson’s June 

25, 2020 order until the mandamus petition is finally decided. Relator subsequently informed this 

Court that: (1) Judge Johnson voluntarily recused himself from the underlying cases on July 6, 

2020; and (2) the cases were reassigned on July 15, 2020, to the Honorable Jason Luong of the 

185th District Court. On July 27, 2020, our Court abated these original proceedings to allow Judge 

Luong to reconsider the challenged order returning venue of the cases to Collin County and, if 

appropriate, to consider the pending motions. 

On October 23, 2020, Judge Luong issued an “Order of Reconsideration of Prior Order 

Vacating Order of Transfer to Harris County” finding that: (1) he lacks jurisdiction to review the 

challenged order or any pending motions in the cases because his plenary jurisdiction expired; and 

(2) alternatively, if it is determined that he does have jurisdiction to review the order, then he 

similarly finds that the order transferring the cases to Harris County should be vacated and the 

cases returned to Collin County. 

Relator has filed a motion to stay enforcement of Judge Luong’s October 23, 2020 order 

and subsequently filed a Supplement to His Petition for Mandamus on Reinstatement After 

Abatement. Real party in interest has filed a motion reasserting his response to the original 

mandamus petition.

We lift the abatement and REINSTATE these original proceedings on the Court’s active 

docket. Relator’s motion to stay enforcement of Judge Luong’s October 23, 2020 order is 

GRANTED. Our stay of the June 25, 2020 order returning venue to Collin County similarly 

remains in effect. Accordingly, enforcement of these orders is ordered stayed until the mandamus 

petition in this Court is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 52.10(b). Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.10(c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Gordon Goodman____

 Acting Individually 

Date: ___October 29, 2020____
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Craig A. McCollam, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Dionex Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, towhich this Certification is attached (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     By: /s/ Craig A. McCollam  Name:  Craig A. McCollam  Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date: November 9, 2006
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Tagalder Global Investment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Chun Ka Tsun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Chun Ka TsunChun Ka Tsun, Chief Executive Officer May 16, 2007
Alberto RIVERA, Appellant, v. Maria Teresa RIVERA, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Kevin Coyle Colbert, Miami, for appellant.

The Padron Law Group, P.L.L.C., and Luis M. Padron, Coral Gables and Brian D. Fell, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, J.

As neither party sought to partition the marital home, the body of jurisprudence relied upon by the former husband in furtherance of appellate relief is inapposite. Accordingly, we find no error and affirm. *See* *Gulledge v. Gulledge*, 82 So.3d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (narrowly holding that in partition cases "the trial court err[s] by failing to include a deadline for the refinancing or sale of the marital home"); *Sullivan v. Sullivan*, 363 So.2d 393, 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) (discussing that in partition cases "the judgment must fix a reasonable deadline by which the sale must take place"); *see also* *Smilack v. Smilack*, 858 So.2d 1072, 1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ("[A] trial court may enforce the provisions of a final judgment through any appropriate remedy.") (citing *Montanez v. Montanez*, 697 So.2d 184, 186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ).

Affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ELIZABETH DENBY MARSHALL, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2917

)

MICHAEL J. MULLAUGH and BANK OF )

NEW YORK MELLON, as PERSONAL )

REPRESENTATIVES of THE ESTATE )

OF PEGGY A. DENBY, DECEASED, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed February 14, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 

from the Circuit Court for Lee County; 

Michael T. McHugh, Judge.

Theodore L. Tripp, Jr., and Jamie B. 

Schwinghamer of Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, 

Naples; Kenneth E. Kemp, II of Patrone & 

Kemp, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Jennifer R. Dixon of Lowndes, Drosdick, 

Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
# L_2018296EN.01004001.xml

| 22.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 296/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 296/40

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1787 of 19 November 2018 amending and extending Decision 2010/96/CFSP on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 293 of 20 November 2018
  )

On page 10, in the concluding formula:

for:

‘Done at Luxembourg, 19 November 2018.’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 19 November 2018.’.

---
# C_2017178EN.01001102.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 3 April 2017 — Edel Grace, Peter Sweetman v An Bord Pleanala

(Case C-164/17)

(2017/C 178/13)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Edel Grace, Peter Sweetman

Applicants:

Defendant: An Bord Pleanala

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Where

| a) | a protected site has as its essential purpose the provision of habitat for a specified species |
| --- | --- |

a)

a protected site has as its essential purpose the provision of habitat for a specified species

| b) | the nature of the habitat which is beneficial for that species means that the part of the site which is beneficial will necessarily alter over time, and |
| --- | --- |

b)

the nature of the habitat which is beneficial for that species means that the part of the site which is beneficial will necessarily alter over time, and

| c) | as part of a proposed development a management plan for the site as a whole (including changes to the management of parts of the site not directly affected by the development itself) is to be put in place which is designed to ensure that, at any given time, the amount of the site suitable as habitat as aforesaid is not reduced and indeed may be enhanced; but |
| --- | --- |

c)

as part of a proposed development a management plan for the site as a whole (including changes to the management of parts of the site not directly affected by the development itself) is to be put in place which is designed to ensure that, at any given time, the amount of the site suitable as habitat as aforesaid is not reduced and indeed may be enhanced; but

| d) | some of the site will, for the lifetime of the development project, be excluded from having the potential to provide appropriate habitat,
  can such measures as are described in (c) properly be regarded as mitigatory? |
| --- | --- |

d)

some of the site will, for the lifetime of the development project, be excluded from having the potential to provide appropriate habitat,

can such measures as are described in (c) properly be regarded as mitigatory?

---