alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 612 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 612

 Recognizing women-owned small businesses for National Small Business 
                                 Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2022

Ms. Ernst (for herself, Mr. Risch, Mr. Young, Ms. Hirono, Mrs. Capito, 
and Mr. Markey) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
        to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing women-owned small businesses for National Small Business 
                                 Week.

Whereas the United States proudly recognizes small businesses as the backbone of 
        the economy and acknowledges the impactful contributions of women 
        entrepreneurs throughout the United States who are pushing small 
        businesses to succeed;
Whereas, because female professionals, leaders, and small business owners play a 
        vital role in the economy of the United States, when the United States 
        empowers women, it empowers the entire economy;
Whereas women entrepreneurs provide critical goods and services, create high-
        paying jobs, build stronger supply chains for the United States, and 
        play an integral role in Federal contracting and procurement;
Whereas women small business owners are key job creators and employers that are 
        building a legacy for the next generation of businesswomen;
Whereas, according to the 2019 Annual Business Survey conducted by the Census 
        Bureau, women-owned businesses employed more than 10,000,000 workers and 
        accumulated $1,800,000,000,000 in receipts;
Whereas women-owned businesses make up more than 20 percent of all employer 
        firms in the United States;
Whereas the vast majority of all women-owned businesses are classified as small 
        businesses;
Whereas National Small Business Week takes place from May 1 to May 7, 2022, and 
        recognizes the critical contributions of the entrepreneurs and small 
        business owners of the United States; and
Whereas women-owned small businesses should be celebrated for their 
        accomplishments and contributions during National Small Business Week: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) acknowledges the important role women-owned small 
        businesses have in the economy of the United States; and
            (2) commits to supporting women-owned small businesses by 
        recognizing those businesses during National Small Business 
        Week.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2018019EN.01001001.xml

| 24.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/10

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2018/109

of 22 January 2018

appointing six members of the Court of Auditors

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposals by the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Spain, the Italian Republic, the Portuguese Republic and the Republic of Finland,

Having regard to the opinions of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The terms of office of Ms Bettina Michelle JAKOBSEN, Mr Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA, Mr Pietro RUSSO, Mr João FIGUEIREDO and Mr Ville ITÄLÄ are due to expire on 28 February 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The terms of office of Ms Bettina Michelle JAKOBSEN, Mr Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA, Mr Pietro RUSSO, Mr João FIGUEIREDO and Mr Ville ITÄLÄ are due to expire on 28 February 2018.

| (2) | The term of office of Ms Iliana IVANOVA is due to expire on 31 December 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The term of office of Ms Iliana IVANOVA is due to expire on 31 December 2018.

| (3) | New appointments should therefore be made, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

New appointments should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed members of the Court of Auditors:

| (a) | for the period from 1 March 2018 to 29 February 2024:






  — | Ms Bettina Michelle JAKOBSEN, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

for the period from 1 March 2018 to 29 February 2024:

—

Ms Bettina Michelle JAKOBSEN,

| — | Mr Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA, |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA,

| — | Mr Pietro RUSSO, |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Pietro RUSSO,

| — | Mr João FIGUEIREDO, |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr João FIGUEIREDO,

| — | Mr Hannu TAKKULA; |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Hannu TAKKULA;

| (b) | for the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2024:






  — | Ms Iliana IVANOVA. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

for the period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2024:

—

Ms Iliana IVANOVA.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2018.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  Opinions of 14 November 2017 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 28, 2022

NO. 03-21-00401-CR

Elizabeth Ann Mills, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6940 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-JCC; 1:05-cv-00035-JCC)

Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 29, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,

Assistant United States Attorney, David Benjamin Joyce, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Mitchell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mitchell has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
      32.1








Written
      Statement of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The
      undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of The Wilber Corporation (the
      "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date
      hereof:





(a)
            the
                Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30,
                2006,
                filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
                (the
                "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(b)
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Douglas C. GulottyDouglas
                C. GulottyPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:August
                7, 2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to The Wilber Corporation and will be retained
      by The Wilber Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.








40
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6550** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. REGINALD DUANE DARGAN, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Catherine C. Blake , Chief District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00578

- CCB

- 1; 1:15

- cv - 01351

- CCB )

Submitted : August 18 , 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016

Before WILKINSON , KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Reginald Duane Dargan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin M. Block, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, John Walter Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimor e, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Reginald Duane Dargan, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appeala ble unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) ( 20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion sta tes a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dargan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis miss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.02

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc. as managing member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC, certify that (i) the Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 of
TriView Global Fund, LLC fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2006
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of TriView Global Fund, LLC.


TRIVIEW GLOBAL FUND, LLC
By:	TriView Capital Management, Inc., Managing Member


By: /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:	May 15, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Andrew Grieve, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Fsona Systems Corp. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fsona Systems Corp.

 

Dated:  August 20, 2007

 

 

/s/ Andrew Grieve

Andrew Grieve

President, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer

and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fsona Systems Corp. and will be retained by Fsona Systems Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

CW1379733.1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 478 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 478

Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to increase the 
   voting threshold to invoke cloture on general appropriation bills 
                   during periods of high inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2021

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Marshall, and Mr. Scott of 
Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to increase the 
   voting threshold to invoke cloture on general appropriation bills 
                   during periods of high inflation.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Stop Inflationary Spending 
Resolution''.

SEC. 2. CLOTURE THRESHOLD FOR GENERAL APPROPRIATION BILLS DURING 
              PERIODS OF HIGH INFLATION.

    Paragraph 2 of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 
amended in the second undesignated subparagraph by inserting ``, or on 
a general appropriation bill, or an amendment thereto, amendment 
between the Houses in relation thereto, conference report thereon, or 
motion thereon, that is considered during a period during which the 
increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers with 
respect to the preceding 12-month period, as determined by the Bureau 
of Labor Statistics, is more than 4.0 percent, in which case the 
necessary affirmative vote shall be two-thirds of the Senators present 
and voting'' after ``present and voting''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 24.7

Power of Attorney of J. Robert Fitzgerald



STATE OF GEORGIA

COUNTY OF FULTON


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, J. Robert Fitzgerald, Director of
EDUTREK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia corporation, do constitute and appoint
Steve Bostic and Daniel D. Moore, jointly and severally, my true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
me in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for EDUTREK
INTERNATIONAL, INC. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
incorporating such changes as any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems
appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-
fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 5th day of
March 1999.



                             /s/ J. Robert Fitzgerald
                             --------------------------
                             J. Robert Fitzgerald



                                ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                --------------

BEFORE me this 5th day of March 1999, came J. Robert Fitzgerald, personally
known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power
of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                             /s/  Dee Ann Stone
                             ------------------
                             NOTARY PUBLIC


                             State of Georgia
                                      -------

                             My Commission Expires:

                             February 1, 2003
                             ----------------
Exhibit 22

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-23 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
No. 95-2604

 

William Rendleman, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Steel City Marine *

Transport, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

 

Submitted: February 16, 1996

 Filed: March 11, 1996

 

Before WOLLMAN, HEANEY, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

 

PER CURIAM.

William Rendleman, chief engineer of a tow boat owned and operated

by Steel City Marine Transport, Inc. ("Steel City"), brought an action

under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, to recover damages that resulted from

a personal injury. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Steel City and

the court entered judgment accordingly. Rendleman appeals the district

court's ruling permitting Steel City to introduce Rendleman's complaint

into evidence. We affirm.

In its defense, Steel City asserted that Rendleman was not involved

in any accident. Instead, Steel City maintained, Rendleman's knee "went

out" as a result of a prior non-work-related injury and Rendleman

fabricated the story about an accident to recover from his employer. In

a statement to his treating
2

physician, on an accident report form, and in his civil complaint against

Steel City, Rendleman claimed that he was injured on February 3, 1990. At

trial, however, Rendleman asserted that the accident occurred on February

5, 1990. Steel City argued that Rendleman changed the date of the alleged

accident because he had made a record in a work log for February 3, 1990

in which he made no mention of an accident but he had not completed any

work log for February 5, 1990. 

Rendleman's argument on appeal--that the court abused its discretion

by allowing Steel City to introduce his complaint into evidence--borders

on frivolous. Statements made in pleadings constitute admissions.

Missouri Hous. Dev. Comm'n v. Brice, 919 F.2d 1306, 1314 (8th Cir. 1990).

As such, they are admissible at trial. County of Hennepin v. AFG Indus.,

Inc., 726 F.2d 149, 153 (8th Cir. 1984). Although it would have been

possible, as Rendleman urges, for the jury to have found no fundamental

inconsistency between the complaint alleging an accident "on or about

February 3, 1990" and his later testimony that the accident occurred on

February 5, 1990, that possibility speaks to the weight and value of the

evidence, not to its admissibility in the first instance. 

The district court's admission of Rendleman's complaint in no way

constitutes an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment

below.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
MORGENSTEIN & JUBELIRER LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN Francisco

Oo a7AnN OA BF WD =

NH NN NY NY NY DN B Bw Bw Bw sew ew an an an a
Q ara fF © NN |= FDO AN DaAKRWDNH AS

27
28

05086.00004

580294.1

Case 3:05-cv-01874-JSW Document 23 Filed 08/12/2005 Page 1 of 1

Morgenstein & Jubelirer LLP

Shawn D. Parrish (CSB #155697), sparrish@mjllp.com

Ann O'Connell (CSB # 233727), ako@ mijllp.com

One Market, Spear Street Tower, 32nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105,
(415) 901-8700, Fax: (415) 901-8701

Ungaretti and Harris LLP

Brian V. Alcala (pro hac vice), bvalcala@uhlaw.com

Frank J. Saibert (pro hac vice), fjsaibert@uhlaw.com

3500 Three First National Plaza, Chicago, IL 60602, (312) 977-4400, Fax: (312) 977-4405

Attorneys for Defendants Fillmore Properties L.L.C., Caboose Partners L.L.C., Zephyr Properties
Corp., Laramar Communities L.L.C., Jeffrey S. Elowe, David Woodwood, Bradford Korzen and
Steven Boyack
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PASCAL BOKAR THIAM, ET AL., Case No.: C-05-01874 JSW
Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DEFENDANT BRADFORD
v. KORZEN’S DUE DATE TO ANSWER

OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE
FILLMORE PROPERTIES, L.L.C., ET AL., COMPLAINT TO SEPTEMBER 12,
2005
Defendants.
Dept: Courtroom 2

The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation To Extend Defendant Bradford
Korzen’s Due Date To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To The Complaint To September 12, 2005
and good cause appearing, hereby rules as follows:

Defendant Bradford Korzen’s due date to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’
complaint is extended to September 12, 2005.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: August12 , 2005

Judged. white

-1-

[Proposed] Order Extending Defendant Bradford Korzen’s|
Due Date To Answer Or Otherwise Respond To The Complaint To September 12, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

M IGUEL A. REYES,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 2 96

- CR

Appeal from the

3 46 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20090D05388 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until April 29 , 201 4

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Charles L. Roberts

, the Appellant ’ s Attorney

,

prepare the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 29 , 201 4

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 nd day of April , 2014

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
EX-10.2







Exhibit 10.2


Schedule of Grants Made Under Form of 2009-2011 Performance Share Agreement



	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Title	 	Target Shares
	Christopher O’Donnell
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	81,200
	Diana Purcel
	 	Chief Financial Officer and Secretary	 	52,800
Case 3:05-cv-00199-K Document 15 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 51
 

 Case 3:05-cv-00199-K Document 15 Filed 07/12/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 52