alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2014-2





The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2014 (as amended and supplemented, or
otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2014-2, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from June 11, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting
Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer
this 30th day of March, 2015.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
Exhibit
23.2




[Letterhead
of King & Wood, PRC Lawyers]




China
Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd.


Jingmeng
High-Tech Building B, 4th Floor


No. 5
Shangdi East Road


Haidian
District, Beijing 100085


People’s
Republic of China




Ladies
and Gentlemen:





We hereby
consent to the reference to our firm’s name under the headings “Risk Factors,”
“Regulation,” and elsewhere in the annual report on Form 20-F of China Digital
TV Holding Co., Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008.




In giving
such consent, we do not thereby admit that we fall within the category of the
person whose consent is required under Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the regulations promulgated thereunder.




Sincerely
yours,





/s/
King & Wood, PRC Lawyers


Date: May
20,
2009
### Opinion issued December 29, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— 

### NO. 01

- 15

- 01009

- CV

——————————— IN RE RICHARD STEPHE N CALKINS , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this original proceeding, relator, Richard Stephen Calkins, seeks a writ of

mandamus 1 

### to compel the respondent, the Honorable Christine Butts, to vacate her order of September 2, 2015, granting a motion to recuse. 2 The amended petition for

writ of mandamus is denied . All pending motions are denied as moot

.

1 Ca lkins also filed a motion for emergency relief, which was denied on December 2, 2015.

2 The underlying case is In re Mary Olive Calkins , cause number 441,165, pending in the Probate Court No 2 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Mike Wood presiding (Ho norable Christine Butts voluntarily recused)

.

### P ER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.
Carlos TRAMONTANA, Appellant, v. MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P., Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2879

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 35.c


                                      [LOGO] Deutsche Bank

                                      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
                                      Commercial Real Estate / Global Banking
                                      60 Wall Street, 42nd Floor, NYC60-4216
                                      New York, NY 10005



                         ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
                              OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
                    January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007

                   COMM 2007-C-9 Mortgage Trust (the "Trust")

We, Amy Sinensky and Steve Sauer, are Directors of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, a New York State Corporation (the "Sub-Servicer"), acting as a
Sub-Servicer for KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc., (the "Servicer")
pursuant to the Sub-Servicing Agreement dated as of August 14, 2007 (the
"Sub-Servicing Agreement"), between Sub-Servicer and Servicer, relating to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2007, among
Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as depositor, KeyCorp Real
Estate Capital Markets, Inc., as master servicer (with respect to all of the
mortgage loans sold to the depositor by German American Capital Corporation
(other than the Capmark/GACC Mortgage Loans (as defined therein) and the
mortgage loan identified as the DDR Portfolio Loan) and Keybank National
Association), Capmark Finance Inc., as master servicer (with respect to all of
the mortgage loans sold to the depositor by Capmark Finance Inc. and the
Capmark/GACC Mortgage Loans)"), LNR Partners, Inc., as special servicer (with
respect to all of the Mortgage Loans other than the DDR Portfolio Loan), Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee and custodian, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as certificate administrator and paying agent certify that:

(i)   a review of the activities of DBTCA, as Sub-Servicer, for the year ending
      December 31, 2007, and of its performance under this Agreement has been
      made under our supervision and;

(ii)  to the best of our knowledge, based on such review, DBTCA, as
      Sub-Servicer, during the preceding calendar year ending December 31, 2007,
      has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sub-Servicing Agreement in
      all material respects.


Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (DBTCA):


By:     /s/ Steve Sauer                      By:    /s/ Amy Sinensky
       -----------------------------               -----------------------------
Name:   Steve Sauer                          Name:  Amy Sinensky
       -----------------------------               -----------------------------
Title:  Director                             Title: Director
       -----------------------------               -----------------------------
Date:   3/10/08                              Date:  3/10/08
       -----------------------------               -----------------------------
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O

. 09

- 22

- 00200

- CR

__________________

DYLAN PAUL TICE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20

- 34,902

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an open plea, a ppellant Dylan Paul Tice pleaded guilty to the offense of

violation of a protective order with previous convictions , a third

- degree felony. See

Tex. P enal Code Ann. § 25.07(g)(2) . After conducting a sentencing hearing, the trial

court found Tice guilty of the offense of violation of a protective order with previous

convictions and assessed Tice ’s punishment at six years of confinement.

Tice ’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel’s

professional evaluation of the record and concludes that the appeal is frivolous. See2 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1978). On July 27 , 2022, we granted an extension of time for Tice to file

a pro se brief. We received no response from Tice

.

We have independently reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with

counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeal. See Anders , 386

U.S. at 744. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel

to re

- brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991). We affirm the trial co urt’s judgment. 1

AFFIRMED.

_________________________ W. SCOTT GOLEMON
Chief Justice

Submitted on October 28, 2022 Opinion Delivered November 9, 2022

Do Not Publish

Before Golemon , C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

1 Tice may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
Shannon SIMS, Doc #Y04686, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3620

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Science and Technology Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of Science and Technology Policy.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Office of Science and Technology Policy publishes the names of the members selected to serve on its SES Performance Review Board (PRB).

# DATES:

                        Membership is effective on the date this notice is published in the                         **Federal Register**                         to January 2027.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Caitlin Pepicelli, Human Capital Specialist or Ms. Stacy Murphy, Deputy Chief Operations Officer/Security Officer, Office of Science and Technology Policy, 1650 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20504, 202-456-4444.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more PRBs. The purpose of this PRB is to review and make recommendations concerning proposed performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses, pay adjustments, and other appropriate personnel actions for incumbents of the SES positions. The Board shall consist of at least three members and more than half of the members shall consist of career appointees. The names and titles of the PRB members are as follows:

Marie Scott, Associate General Counsel, Children, Families and Aging Division, Department of Health and Human Services;

Scott Driggs, Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Denver, Department of Health and Human Services;

Rachel Park, Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, New York, Department of Health and Human Services;

Constance Kossally, Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Atlanta, Department of Health and Human Services;

Alphonso J. Hughes, Executive Assistant Director, Administration Group, Bureau of ATF, Department of Justice;

Paula Lee, Chief Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, Department of Health and Human Services.

Dated: February 7, 2025.

Stacy Murphy,

Deputy Chief Operations Officer/Security Officer.

[FR Doc. 2025-02508 Filed 2-11-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3270-F1-P
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 750 

Celebrating the United States-Republic of Korea alliance and the dedication 

of the Wall of Remembrance at the Korean War Veterans Memorial 

on July 27, 2022. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 6, 2022 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Ms. DUCKWORTH) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the United States-Republic of Korea alliance and 

the dedication of the Wall of Remembrance at the Korean War Veterans Memorial on July 27, 2022. 

Whereas, formed with the signing of the Mutual Defense 

Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of 

Korea, done at Washington October 1, 1953, the United 

States-Republic of Korea alliance is the linchpin of peace, 

security, and prosperity for Northeast Asia, a free and 

open Indo-Pacific region, and across the world; 

Whereas United States-Republic of Korea military and defense ties are unwavering, and our ever-increasing economic, technological, diplomatic, people-to-people, and 

values-based bonds are strong and enduring; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 750 ATS 

Whereas the United States commitment to the defense of the 

Republic of Korea remains ironclad, and the alliance continues to work toward our shared goals of securing peace, 

stability, and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula and 

throughout the Indo-Pacific; 

Whereas the Wall of Remembrance at the Korean War Veterans Memorial was dedicated on July 27, 2022, with the 

names of more than 36,600 members of the United 

States Armed Forces who lost their lives in the Korea 

conflict, along with more than 7,100 Korean Augmentation to the United States Army personnel who died serving alongside them; 

Whereas the names of the United States and Republic of Korean fallen are integrated to reflect the shared burden 

they bore to defend the Republic of Korea; and 

Whereas the Republic of Korea and its citizens funded nearly 

the entire $22,000,000 cost of building the Wall of Remembrance: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate deeply appreciates and sin2 cerely thanks the Government and people of the Republic 

3 of Korea for their generosity in funding the Wall of Re4 membrance, reflecting the shared sacrifice and common 

5 values of the United States-Republic of Korea alliance. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Benjamin MCDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4756

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 29 (Thursday, February 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02647]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Commission public business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, February 21, 2025, 10:00 a.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Meeting to take place in person and is open to the public.

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425

    It will also be livestreamed on the Commission's YouTube page: 
https://www.youtube.com/user/USCCR/videos.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Kim: 202-376-7700; 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Government in 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding 
a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of 
February. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer 
assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link 
to access CART (in English) on Friday, February 21, 2025, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-
only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not 
an exact transcript.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
    A. Discussion and Vote on State Advisory Committee Appointments
     Maryland
     Michigan
     Montana
     New Jersey
     New York
     Oklahoma
     Rhode Island
     Virginia
    B. Management and Operations
     Staff Director's Report
III. Adjourn Meeting

    Dated: February 11, 2025.
David Mussatt,
USCCR Chief Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2025-02647 Filed 2-11-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10480

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES N. JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CR-124-A)

March 4, 1998

Before JOHNSON, EMILIO M. GARZA, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles N. Jackson appeals the sentence imposed after his

guilty-plea conviction for bank theft. Specifically, Jackson

argues that the district court erred in its determination of the

amount of loss establishing his base offense level and in failing

to use the guideline for attempt offenses.

This Court reviews the application of the Sentencing

Guidelines de novo and the district court’s finding of fact for

clear error. United States v. Wimbish, 980 F.2d 312, 313 (5th Cir.
2

1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 919 (1993). After a careful review

of the record, the arguments, and the authorities, the Court

concludes that the district court did not err in measuring the

amount of loss based on the total amount of worthless checks

Jackson and his coconspirators deposited rather than by the amount

he and his coconspirators withdrew. See United States v. Sowels,

998 F.2d 249, 250-52 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.,S. 1121

(1994); Wimbish, 980 F.2d at 314-16. Further, because Jackson

completed the acts necessary to complete the offense, the

Sentencing Guideline for attempt offenses was not applicable.

Therefore, the district court did not err in choosing not to use

it.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 20761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10359]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-30,792]


Pennzoil Products Company (Oil & Gas Segment) Bradford, 
Pennsylvania; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 10, 1995, applicable to 
all workers of the subject firm.
    The certification notice will soon be published in the Federal 
Register.
    The Department, on its own motion, reviewed the certification for 
workers of the subject firm. The findings show that the earliest 
possible impact date could be February 2, 1994. Accordingly, the 
Department is amending the certification by inserting a new impact date 
of February 2, 1994.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers who were adversely affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-30,792 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Pennzoil Products Company (Oil & Gas Segment), 
Bradford District, Bradford, Pennsylvania who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after February 2, 1994 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of April 1995.
Victor J. Trunzo,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 95-10359 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,032,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,868,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,623,000
<PP&E>                                      10,750,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,255,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,567,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,486,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,036,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,103,000
<SALES>                                    173,235,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           173,235,000
<CGS>                                      145,968,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              162,645,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               868,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               318,651
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             719,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,003,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,758,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,245,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00
        

</TABLE>