alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018164EN.01004801.xml

| 29.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/48

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/926

of 26 June 2018

appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Spain, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. On 5 October 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/1792 (4), Mr Ignacio GONZÁLEZ GONZÁLEZ was replaced by Ms Cristina CIFUENTES CUENCAS as a member. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. On 5 October 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/1792 (4), Mr Ignacio GONZÁLEZ GONZÁLEZ was replaced by Ms Cristina CIFUENTES CUENCAS as a member.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Cristina CIFUENTES CUENCAS, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Ms Cristina CIFUENTES CUENCAS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Ángel GARRIDO GARCÍA, Presidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Ángel GARRIDO GARCÍA, Presidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 26 June 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. ZAHARIEVA

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

(4)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/1792 of 5 October 2015 appointing five Spanish members and five Spanish alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 28).

4

---
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 633 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2022, as ‘‘Silver Star 

Service Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2022 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mr. HAWLEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2022, 

as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

who were wounded or became ill in combat in the wars 

fought by the United States; 

Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to 

help the people of the United States remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill members of the 

Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver 

Star Service Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 633 ATS 

Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of 

America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices made by 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans on behalf of 

the United States through the presence of a Silver Star 

Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying; 

Whereas the sacrifices made by members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans on behalf of the United States 

should never be forgotten; and 

Whereas May 1, 2022, is an appropriate date to designate as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of May 1, 2022, as 

3 ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’; and 

4 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

5 to observe Silver Star Service Banner Day with ap6 propriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER REGARDING CX6786-R

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER REGARDING CX6786-R

 CX6786-R, a recording of Qualcomm’s meeting with the Internal Revenue Service, has 

been admitted into evidence. Qualcomm offered to prepare a certified transcript of the recording 

for the Court’s convenience. The parties shall jointly file a certified transcript of the recording on 

Tuesday, January 29, 2019. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1408 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 1
**GMAC RFC****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)****Residential Funding Company, LLC****Lehman XS Trust, Series 2007-15N (the "Issuing Entity")**The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that: 1.A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision. 2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 14th day of March 2008. By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi Name: Anthony N. Renzi Title: Managing Director
Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 13-1 Filed 01/17/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 13-1 Filed 01/17/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 13-1 Filed 01/17/17 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey
      Markin ,
      as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Jeffrey Markin


Jeffrey
      Markin


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


August
      12, 2008





This
      Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
June ANDERSON, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-997

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 67 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 67

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the fundamental right to vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2022

  Mr. Durbin (for himself, Ms. Warren, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Merkley, Ms. 
Hirono, Mr. Markey, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the fundamental right to vote.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Every citizen of the United States, who is of legal 
voting age, shall have the fundamental right to vote in any public 
election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides.
    ``Section 2. The fundamental right of citizens of the United States 
to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any 
State or political subdivision within a State unless such denial or 
abridgment is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and 
is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 
governmental interest.
    ``Section 3. The portion of section 2 of the fourteenth article of 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States that consists of the 
phrase `or other crime,' is repealed.
    ``Section 4. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article and protect against any denial or abridgement of the 
fundamental right to vote by legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARKISE CROSBY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 129 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS25-02]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of special closed meeting.

*Description:*                     In accordance with section 1104(b) of Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, codified at 12 U.S.C. 3333(b), notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) met for a Special Closed Meeting on this date.                

*Location:*                     Virtual meeting via Webex.                

*Date:*                     February 5, 2025.                

*Time:*                     10:30 a.m. ET.                

## Discussion Items

1. State Compliance Reviews

2. Personnel Matter

The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss State Compliance Reviews and a personnel matter pursuant to section 1104(b) of Title XI (12 U.S.C. 3333(b)). No action was taken by the ASC.

Loretta Schuster,

Management & Program Analyst.

[FR Doc. 2025-02538 Filed 2-11-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 645 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 645

  To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Hale-
                               Cusanelli.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2022

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Hale-
                               Cusanelli.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Hale-Cusanelli, Cr. No. 21-37, pending 
        in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the 
        prosecution has requested the production of testimony from Daniel 
        Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate, and from Nate Russell and Diego Torres, custodians of records in 
        the Senate Recording Studio, a department of the Office of the Sergeant 
        at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, and Nate Russell and Diego Torres, 
custodians of records in the Senate Recording Studio, are authorized to 
provide relevant testimony in the case of United States v. Hale-
Cusanelli, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 
asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Messrs. Schwager, Russell, and Torres, and any current or former 
officer or employee of their offices, in connection with the production 
of evidence authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Form of Beneficial Owner Election Form



 Exhibit 4.6 
 FORM OF BENEFICIAL OWNER ELECTION 
 The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the
enclosed materials referred to therein relating to the offering by Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) of subscription rights (the “Rights”) to purchase shares of the Company’s
common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Rights Offering”). 
 With respect to any instructions to exercise (or not
to exercise) the Rights, the undersigned acknowledges that this form must be completed and returned such that it will actually be received by you by 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on February [    ], 2009, the last
business day prior to the scheduled expiration date of the Rights Offering of March [    ], 2009 (which may be extended by the Company in its sole discretion). 
 This will instruct you whether to exercise Rights to purchase shares of the common stock distributed with respect to the shares of the common stock held
by you for the account of the undersigned, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Prospectus and the related Subscription Rights Certificates. 
 Box 1.  ̈ • Please DO NOT EXERCISE RIGHTS for shares of common stock. 
 Box 2.  ̈ • Please EXERCISE RIGHTS for shares of common stock as set forth below. 
 The number of Rights for which the undersigned gives instructions for exercise under the Basic Subscription Rights should not exceed the number of Rights
that the undersigned is entitled to exercise. 
  

							
	 	 	 Number of Rights, each
 Right for two Shares
	 	 Subscription Price
 per Right
	 	 Payment

				
	 Basic Subscription Rights
	 	[            ] X	 	$[            ] =	 	$             (Line 1)
				
	 Over-Subscription Rights
	 	[            ] X	 	$[            ] =	 	$             (Line 2)
				
		 	Total Payment Required	 		 	$            
		 		 		 	(Sum of Lines 1 and 2 must equal total of amounts in Boxes 3 and 4)

 Box 3.  ̈ • Payment in the following amount is enclosed
$            . 
 Box 4.  ̈ •
Please deduct payment from the following account maintained by you as follows: 
  

	
	 Type of Account:
                                         
                           

	 Account No.:
                                         
                                  

	 Amount to be deducted:            $                     
                        


  

	
	 Signature:
                                         
                                       


	 Name:
                                         
                                         
    

	 Title:
                                         
                                         
      

	 Date:                     ,
2009


 IMPORTANT: PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: 
 1. THE EXERCISE OF THIS RIGHT WAS SOLICITED BY MAXIM GROUP LLC. THE UNDERSIGNED ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT MAXIM GROUP LLC SHALL BE COMPENSATED FOR THE EXERCISE OF THIS RIGHT.    ̈ 
 2. IF THE EXERCISE OF THIS RIGHT WAS NOT SOLICITED BY MAXIM GROUP LLC, PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING BOX.    ̈ 
  

	
	Dated:
	
	  
	(Signature)
	
	  
	(Address)
	
	  
	
	  
	(Tax Identification Number)
Wayne WARNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 7, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**[KPMG Logo]****KPMG LLP**1601 Market Street  Philadelphia. PA 19103-2499 **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**The Board of Members Regulus Group LLC: We have examined management's assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our proced ures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects. / s /   K P M G   L L P  February 12, 2008