alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

9277 

Federal Register 

Vol. 90, No. 27 

Tuesday, February 11, 2025 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 14200 of February 5, 2025 

Amendment to Duties Addressing the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the National Emergencies 

Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, 

I hereby determine and order: 

Section 1. Amendment. Regarding the Executive Order of February 1, 2025 

(Imposing Duties to Address the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the 

People’s Republic of China), the following shall replace subsection (g) of 

section 2: 

‘‘(g) Duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321 is available 

for otherwise eligible covered articles described in subsection (a) of this 

section, but shall cease to be available for such articles upon notification 

by the Secretary of Commerce to the President that adequate systems are 

in place to fully and expediently process and collect tariff revenue applicable 

pursuant to subsection (a) of this section for covered articles otherwise 

eligible for de minimis treatment.’’ 

Sec. 2. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed 

to impair or otherwise affect: 

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or 

the head thereof; or 

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. 

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and 

subject to the availability of appropriations. 


KHAMMOND on DSK9W7S144PROD with PRESDOC
9278 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 27 / Tuesday, February 11, 2025 / Presidential Documents 

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party 

against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, 

employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

February 5, 2025. 

[FR Doc. 2025–02512 

Filed 2–10–25; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


KHAMMOND on DSK9W7S144PROD with PRESDOCTrump.EPS</GPH>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(b)

                             TXU US HOLDINGS COMPANY

                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

     The undersigned, Erle Nye, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive of TXU
US Holdings Company (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

     1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
          30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
          Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 14th day of August, 2002.


                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Name:  Erle Nye
                                Title: Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Stephen R. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2416

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
1 

Case No. 16-MD-02752-LHK 

ORDER RELATING AND CONSOLIDATING CASES 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

IN RE YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA 

SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION 

Case No. 16-MD-02752-LHK 

ORDER RELATING AND 

CONSOLIDATING CASES 

An administrative motion has been filed in the docket for Schwartz v. Yahoo! Inc., 5:16-

CV-05456-LHK, to consider whether Ridolfo, et al. v. Yahoo! Inc., 3:17-CV-00619-MEJ, and Neff 

v. Yahoo! Inc., et al., 5:17-CV-00641-NC, should be related to Schwartz v. Yahoo! Inc., 5:16-CV05456-LHK. The time for objections has passed and no objection has been filed. It “appears 

likely that there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting 

results if the cases are conducted before different Judges.” Civil L.R. 3-12(a)(2). Accordingly, 

the Court RELATES Ridolfo and Neff to Schwartz. 

Moreover, the Court CONSOLIDATES Ridolfo, et al. v. Yahoo! Inc., 3:17-CV-00619-

MEJ, and Neff v. Yahoo! Inc., et al., 5:17-CV-00641-NC, with the Multi-District Litigation 

(“MDL”) case In Re: Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 16-MD-02752-LHK. 

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 64 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 2
2 

Case No. 16-MD-02752-LHK 

ORDER RELATING AND CONSOLIDATING CASES 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Any future filings in Ridolfo or Neff shall be filed in the MDL case, 16-MD-02752-LHK, rather 

than in the individual cases. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 23, 2017 

______________________________________ 

LUCY H. KOH 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 64 Filed 02/23/17 Page 2 of 2
# THEATTORNEYGENERAL OFTEX.~~ Auwruu. Tnmt~e 787ll

The Honorable Wilson E. Speir Director Texas Department ofPublic Safety 5805 N. Lamar Blvd. Box 4087 Austin, Texas 78773 Dear Mr. Speir: Opinion No. H- 256 Re: Whether salary increases for 5-years continuous service may be paid from funds for “federal grant financed **programs ”** 
The General Appropriations Act for fiscal years 1974-1975, (Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., ch. 659, p, 1786 at 2191)states that employees classified in salary groups 2-7 and having five years or more continuous service shall be paid longevity increases. You ask whether these longevity increases can be paid out ofthe funds made available tothe Department ofPublic Safety initem 16ofits appropriations for fiscal years 1974-1975. Item 16appropriates funds to be used for “Federal Grant Financed Programs. ”Appropriations Act, supra, p. 2026. You advise that the federally financed programs towhich item 16refers provide for the **pay** ment of salaries to Department employees classified in salary groups 2-7 and specifically include funds for the payment of longevity increases to them. The Salary Provisions oftheAppropriations Act, at p. 2’191, in§la(l) state that generally longevity.increases are to be paid from those items designated as such. But added to this statement is the following sentence:
“In those instances where lump sum appropriations contain salaries, agencies may **use** funds from those items when the designation [sic] longevity increases are included therein. ” Item 16is a lump sum appropriation for federally financed programs which contain not only salaries butalso longevity increases. Therefore, the funds it makes available to the Department can be used for payment ofthe longevityincreases to which employees classified in salary groups 2-7 have become entitled byvirtue offive years service or more.

p. 1196The Honorable Wilson E. Speir, page 2 (H-256)

S’UMMARY Funds appropriated tothe Department ofPublic Safety for “Federal Grant Financed Programs” can be used for the payment of longevity increases ifthe programs themselves cover thepayment of such increases. Very truly yours,

JOHN L. HILL Attorney General of Texas

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 1197

\
June 26, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DEMETRIUS KOCHEE DANIELS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00685-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Matthew RYBOLT, DOC #D91874, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1841

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00365

- CV
WILLIAMS FARMS PRODUCE SALES, INC.

v. R & G PRODUCE COMPANY
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1 of Cameron County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2008

- CCL

- 0673

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEAL S, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision ce rtified below for observance.

March 27, 2014
Suk C. KIM, Appellant, v. Sook H. CHANG, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4185

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
More Fully Capturing Uncertainty 

Associated with Official Statistics 

Linda J. Young

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service

November 2, 2021

1

The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and 

should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government 

determination or policy.
FCSM Framework for Data Quality

2
NCVS Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Assault

Courtesy of Sharon Lohr

3
Is It Really a Break in Series?

• Breaks in series may be reported when simple 

changes are made

–Change in question ordering

–Change in design

–Change in level of interviewer training

• Are these breaks or a failure to fully reflect the 

uncertainty in the estimates?

4
Census of Agriculture

• Conducted every 5 years (ending 2 & 7)

• Count of all U.S. agricultural operations ($1,000 or more in sales 

or potential sales)

• Uses a list frame, the Census Mailing List 

– Census Mailing List is not complete

• An expanded June Area Survey sample drawn from the NASS 

area frame to assess undercoverage

– 2009 study found substantial misclassification in the June Area Survey

5
Adjusting the Census Weights

• Sampling for nonresponse follow-up (new in 2017)

• Undercoverage modeled in a capture-recapture framework

• Nonresponse modeled

• Misclassification modeled

– Misclassification of farms as non-farms

– Misclassification of non-farms as farms

• Calibration of adjusted weights 

• Rounded the calibrated weights to integers

6


Relative Standard Errors: 2012 Number of Farms

9
Relative Standard Errors: 2012 Total Value of Production

10
Impact of Rounding and Calibration on CVs: 

2012 Number of Farms

11
Impact of Rounding Calibration on CVs: 

2012 Total Value of Production

12
Final Thoughts

• Accounted for variation due to sampling and modeled 

adjustments to the weights

– Sampling error (2017 only)

– Undercoverage

– Nonresponse

– Misclassification

• Accounted for variation due to rounding and calibration

– Approximate, conservative approach in 2012

– Fully in 2017

13
Final Thoughts

• Did not account for other sources of variation

– Record linkage of Census Mailing List to NASS area frame

– Editing 

– Imputation

– Model selection

• Opportunity to develop more accurate standard errors 

14
Thank You!

Linda.J.Young@usda.gov

15
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Form 10-Q), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

     (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Form 10-Q.

Date: April 28, 2006

|   | /s/ David S. Tierney, M.D.                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                 |
|   | David S. Tierney, M.D.                          |
|   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer*)*                 |
|   |                                            |
|   | /s/ Andrew T. Drechsler                         |
|        |                                                 |
|   | Andrew T. Drechsler                             |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                         |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)    |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |

----
Exhibit 15.1    Deloitte   LLP
Bay   Adelaide Centre, East Tower
22   Adelaide Street West, Suite 200
Toronto,   ON M5H 0A9
Canada

Tel:   416-601-6150
Fax:   416-601-6610
www.deloitte.ca  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-213263 on Form F-3 of our reports dated March 7, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P., and the effectiveness of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2016.  /s/ Deloitte LLP  Chartered Professional Accountants Licensed Public Accountants Toronto, Canada  March 7, 2017
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-12 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-12 Filed 06/18/18 Page 2 of 2
# L_2018083EN.01001501.xml

| 27.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 83/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 83/15

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/509

of 22 March 2018

appointing the Vice-President of the European Central Bank

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 283(2),

Having regard to Council Recommendation of 20 February 2018 on the appointment of the Vice-President of the European Central Bank (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Decision 2010/223/EU of the European Council (4), the term of office of Mr Vítor CONSTÂNCIO, Vice-President of the European Central Bank, expires on 31 May 2018 and it is therefore necessary to appoint a new Vice-President of the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Decision 2010/223/EU of the European Council (4), the term of office of Mr Vítor CONSTÂNCIO, Vice-President of the European Central Bank, expires on 31 May 2018 and it is therefore necessary to appoint a new Vice-President of the European Central Bank.

| (2) | The European Council wishes to appoint Mr Luis DE GUINDOS JURADO who, in its view, fulfils all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Council wishes to appoint Mr Luis DE GUINDOS JURADO who, in its view, fulfils all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Luis DE GUINDOS JURADO is hereby appointed Vice-President of the European Central Bank for a term of office of 8 years as from 1 June 2018.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 March 2018.

For the European Council

The President

D. TUSK

---

(1)  
  OJ C 67, 22.2.2018, p. 1.

1

(2)  Opinion delivered on 14 March 2018 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

2

(3)  Opinion delivered on 7 March 2018 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

3

(4)  Decision 2010/223/EU of the European Council of 26 March 2010 appointing the Vice-President of the European Central Bank (OJ L 99, 21.4.2010, p. 7).

4

---
Exhibit 10.63



 Exhibit 10.63 
 Baton Rouge SHS 
 ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT - BATON ROUGE 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT (the “Assignment”) is made effective as of this
14th day of November, 2008, by and between APPLE EIGHT HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIPS, INC., a Virginia corporation (“Apple Eight”),
APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation (“Apple Nine”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. Viking Fund Baton Rouge (LA), LLC (“Seller”) and Apple Eight entered into that certain purchase contract dated December 14, 2007, as
amended by First Amendment to Purchase Contract dated as of March 17, 2008 and amended by Second Amendment to Purchase Contract dated as of March 21, 2008 (collectively, the “Contract”) whereby Seller agreed to sell, and Apple
Eight agreed to purchase, certain real property located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and more particularly described in the Contract. 
 B.
Apple Eight desires to assign its rights and obligations in and under the Contract to Apple Nine. 
 C. Capitalized terms used, but not
otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Contract. 
 WITNESSETH 
 FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid, other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Assignment. Apple Eight hereby assigns and conveys to Apple
Nine all of its rights, title and interests in, to and under the Contract. 
 2. Assumption. The Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to
perform all of the Assignor’s obligations under the Contract. 
 3. Earnest Money Deposit. Apple Nine shall reimburse Apple Eight
the amount of the Earnest Money Deposit together with all interest accrued thereon as of the date hereof. 
 4. Indemnification. Apple
Nine hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Apple Eight from and against any and all claims, losses or damages that may arise out of Apple Nine’s default under or breach of the Contract. 







 5. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts as may be convenient
or necessary, and it shall not be necessary that the signatures of all parties hereto or thereto be contained on any one counterpart hereof or thereof. Additionally, the parties hereto agree that for purposes of facilitating the execution of this
Agreement, the signature pages taken from the separate individually executed counterparts of this Agreement may be combined to form multiple fully executed counterparts. All executed counterparts of this Agreement shall be deemed to be originals,
but all of such counterparts taken together or collectively, as the case may be, shall constitute one and the same agreement. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day first above written. 
  

			
	APPLE EIGHT:
	
	APPLE EIGHT HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David P. Buckley

	Name:	 	David P. Buckley
	Title:	 	Vice-President
	
	APPLE NINE:
	
	APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Justin G. Knight

	Name:	 	Justin G. Knight
	Title:	 	President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDERSEN & ZIMMER

385 GRAND AVE. SUITE 300

OAKLAND, CA 94610

Stipulation Regarding Pretrial Release

Case No. CR 17-054 PJH - 1 -

DAVID L. ANDERSEN (S.B. No. 50010)

ANDERSEN & ZIMMER

385 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 300

OAKLAND, CA 94610

(510)835-4952 FAX (510)835-4958

ATTORNEY FOR MARIELA SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES,

Plaintiff(s),

v. 

MARIELA SOLIS

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Action No. CR 17-054 PJH 

STIPULATION REGARDING

MODIFICATION OF PRETRIAL 

RELEASE CONDITIONS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, David Andersen for 

defendant Mariela Solis, and plaintiff, United States of America, through its counsel Assistant 

United States Attorney Andrew F. Dawson, that the conditions of defendant’s pretrial release 

may be modified as follows:

Defendant Mariela Solis is permitted to travel within the United States without prior 

consent of the court. Ms. Solis is to notify her Supervised Release Officer of her travel plans 

prior to departure. Should pretrial have an objection to the travel, Ms. Solis is not to depart until 

that objection is resolved by the parties or the Court. 

DATED: July 28, 2017

Respectfully Submitted,

Andersen & Zimmer

 /s/ David L. Andersen 

David L. Andersen

Attorney for Mariela Solis

DATED: July 28, 2017 Brian Stretch

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Andrew F. Dawson Assistant United States Attorney
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDERSEN & ZIMMER

385 GRAND AVE. SUITE 300

OAKLAND, CA 94610

Stipulation Regarding Pretrial Release

Case No. CR 17-054 PJH - 2 -

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant, Mariela 

Solis, may travel within the United States without prior consent of the Court. However, Ms. Solis 

is to notify her Supervised Release Officer of her travel plans prior to departure. Should pretrial 

have an objection to the travel, Ms. Solis is not to depart until that objection is resolved by the 

parties or the Court.

DATED: July 28, 2017

__________________________________

HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Pretrial Services AS MODIFIED