alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00830-CR

JOSE ANGEL GONZALEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81581-08

ORDER

We GRANT Official Court Reporter Charon Evans’s October 8, 2014 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due on or before 

November 21, 2014.

The clerk’s record has not been filed and is now overdue. We ORDER the Collin 

County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transmit a copy of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to Charon Evans and to the Collin County District Clerk.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Alberto ROMERO GONZALEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0413

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1170 SRAM CORPORATION (now known as SRAM, LLC), Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. AD-II ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in consolidated case nos. 00-CV-6675 and 01-CV-62, Judge Robert W. Gettleman. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of SRAM Corporation's unopposed motion to reform the caption to indicate that it has merged into SRAM, LLC, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted and the revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### FILED N.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR HE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Richard B. Walsh, Jr., Esq. Michael T. Brady, Esq. 2009 Date

s8
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10107]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Division of Research Grants; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting May 8-9, 1995, 
starting at 8:30 a.m., Building 31C, Conference Room 6, of the Division 
of Research Grants Advisory Committee, which was published in the 
Federal Register on April 3 (60 FR 16880).
    This committee was to have convened at 8:30 a.m. on May 8 to 
adjournment on May 9, but has been changed to May 10-11, 1995, Building 
31C, Conference Room 6, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville 
Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    The meeting will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. on May 10 to 
adjournment on May 11.

    Dated: April 18, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10107 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of RSC Holdings III,
LLC and RSC Equipment Rental, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Not applicable.4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over the financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ David MathiesonDavid MathiesonSenior Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer
f8k011908ex10ix_mmg.htm


     

    
       

       

      Exhibit
10.9


        
        

        
        


        
        

      

       

      CONVERSION
AGREEMENT

      


      This
Conversion Agreement
(the “Agreement”), dated as
of January 19, 2009, is made and entered into by and between Mega Media Group,
Inc. (the “Company”), and Elan
Kaufman. (the “Holder”).

      


      RECITALS

      


      WHEREAS, the Holder holds a 9%
promissory note with an outstanding principal amount of $50,000.00 and interest
amount of $2,120.55 (the “Note”), dated March
19, 2008, 2008 for a total of $52,120.55  which has been assumed by
the Company; and

      


      WHEREAS, the Holder has agreed
to convert the Note, including accrued interest thereon, into shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), on
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

      


      NOW, THEREFORE, intending to
be legally bound, the parties hereby agree as follows:

      


      
        	
                1.  

              	
                Conversion. The Holder
      shall convert the outstanding principal due under the Note, together with
      any interest accrued thereon through the date of conversion, into shares
      of the Company's Common Stock, at the rate of $0.01 per share (the “Conversion”)
      for a total of 5,212,055 shares. The Conversion shall be considered
      payment in full by the Company of the Note and the conversion method in
      the Note shall be waived. The Holder shall deliver the Note to the Company
      for cancellation.

              


      

      


      
        	
                2.  

              	
                Binding Effect. This
      instrument is being executed by the Holder and shall be binding upon its
      successors and assigns for the uses and purposes above set forth and
      referred to, and shall be effective as of the date
  hereof.

              


      

      


      
        	
                3.  

              	
                Governing Law. This
      instrument shall be governed by and enforced in accordance with the laws
      of the State of New York without any application of the principles of
      conflicts of laws.

              


      

      


      


      


      
        
          
          

        

        
          -1-

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

      


       

      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Agreement has been duly executed by the Company and Holder as of the date first
above written.

      


      MEGA
MEDIA GROUP, INC.

       

      /s/
Alex
Shvarts                                   


      Alex
Shvarts, CEO

      


      THE
HOLDER

       

      /s/
Dr. Elan
Kaufman                           


      Dr. Elan
Kaufman

       

       

       

      -2-
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6169** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JERALD VINCENT POSEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:06

- cr - 00340

- HEH

- 8; 3:09

- cv - 00397

- HEH )

Submitted : July 28, 2011 Decided: August 1, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Di smissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jerald Vincent Posey, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Jerald Vincent Posey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard b y demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the dist rict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We ha ve independently reviewed the record and conclude that Posey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are ad equately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

# Certification of
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Business Financial Services,
Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, hereby certify, based on our knowledge that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.

| | /s/ Jerome J. Smith                              
| | -------------------------------------------------
| | Jerome J. Smith                                  
| | Chief Executive Officer                          
| | November 21, 2005                                
| |                                                  
| | /s/ James F. Ropella                             
| | James F. Ropella                                 
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| | November 21, 2005
FILED IN PD-1 341-1 COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL AUSTIN, TEXA July 27, 2015 Transmitted 7/27/2015 12:00:00 Af Accepted 7/27/2015 8:13:45 Ar ABELACOSTA, CLERK ABELACOST. 

### IN 1HE CLER COURT OF COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
No. PD-1341-14


### STACYSTINE CARY, Appellant 

# Kfc^" •WftV

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


### On Appealfrom the Court of Appeals, Fifth District ofTexas atDallas Court of Appeals No. 05-12-01421-CR

APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLYBRIEF 

### Appellant Stacy Stine Cary respectfully moves for an extension oftime to file her Appellant's Briefby until August 14,2015. In support ofthis motion, she would respectfully show as follows: 1. The deadline for filing the Appellant's Briefis July 27, 2015. 

### 2. Appellant seeks an extension oftime of 18 days, until August 14, 2015. 

### 3. An extension is necessary because ofappellate counsel's schedule and 

### the complexity ofthe issues. Appellant's counsel finished ajury trial in Greenville, Texas during the week ofJuly 13, 2015, and he has beentrying to Unopposed Motion for Extension ofTime—Page 1

### catch up with othermatters since then. Appellant's counsel has a hearing in 

### federal court in McAllen, Texas on Monday, July 27, 2015 and then is scheduled to 

### take his eleven-year-old special needs son to Europe and will return on the evening ofAugust 8, 2015. APPELLEE, THE STATE OF TEXAS, DOES NOT OPPOSE THIS REQUESTED EXTENSION. 

### 4. No previous extension has been sought or granted. Respectfully submitted,

Isi John M. Helms John M. Helms Texas Bar No. 09401001 BRODEN, MICKELSEN, HELMS & SNIPES, LLP 2600 State Street Dallas, Tx 75204 Tel: (469)951-8496 Fax:(214)720-9594 

### john@johnhelmslaw.com ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, STACY STINE CARY
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

### Undersigned counsel has conferred with Joseph Corcoran, counsel for 

### Appellee, the State ofTexas, and the Appellee does not oppose this motion. /s/ John M. Helms John M. Helms
Unopposed Motion for Extension ofTime-Page 2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### This certifies that a true and correct copy ofthis instrumenthas been served on counsel ofrecord on July 25, 2015, as follows: Joseph Corcoran Assistant Attorney General P.O. Box 12548 Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * /s/ John M. Helms John M. Helms

Unopposed Motion for Extension ofTime—Page 3
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 7

- 005 80

- C V

Style: Art Shaban v. The Hertz Corporation

Date motion filed * : December 11

, 201 7

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion t o E xten d Time to F ile Appellant’s Appellate Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant Art Shaban’s counsel, Peter J. Clarke Jr.

Document to be filed: Evidence of payment for Clerk’s Record

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due D ate: N/A

Date Requested: January 3 1

, 201 8

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part

 Denied (without prejudice)

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

Although the report er’s record was filed on November 10 , 2017, the Clerk of this Court

notified appellants on October 13

, 2017, that the cl e rk ’s record had not been filed due

to appellant’ s lack of payment, and requested that appellant provide evidence of

payment for that record by November 1 3 , 2017. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3( b ).

Accordingly, appellant’ s brief extension request is denied without prejudice to

refiling after the clerk ’s record is filed

. See id. 38.6(a)(1) (noting that appellant’s brief

is due 30 days after later of the date the clerk’s or reporter’s record is filed). However,

if appellant fails to provide evidence of payment for the clerk’s record within 10

d ays of the date of this Order , this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution

without further notice. See id. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting for the Court

Date: December 2 1 , 2017
Form of Waiver



 Exhibit 10.2 
 WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the
United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the
regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I acknowledge that this regulation may
require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they
relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver
includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise
receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship.
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 Plaintiff(s), 

v.

 

 Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD:

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application.

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC

3:16-cv-07213

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC., et al.

Margaret E. Ives Margaret E. Ives Margaret E. Ives District of Massachusetts Saphena Medical, Inc. and Albert Chin

Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP, Two International 

Place, Boston, MA 02110

Turner Boyd LLP, 702 Marshall Street, 

Redwood City, CA 94063 (617) 248-4907 (650) 521-5930 mives@choate.com boyd@turnerboyd.com 668906 01/19/17 Karen I. Boyd January 23, 2017.

Case 3:16-cv-07213-WHA Document 39 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.4






Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT TO THE

FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN




     WHEREAS, FirstMerit Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the “Corporation”), adopted the
FirstMerit Corporation Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), originally effective as
of February 13, 1987, and amended and restated effective as of August 28, 1995, January 1, 2001 and
December 31, 2008; and



     WHEREAS, Section 9.07 of the Plan provides that the Corporation may amend the Plan from time
to time, provided that such amendment does not reduce the benefits or rights of any Member (as
defined in the Plan) or his Beneficiary (as defined in the Plan) accrued prior to the date of such
amendment; and



     WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to make certain amendments to the Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation hereby amends the Plan, effective as of January 8, 2009, by:


1. Deleting Section 2.03 in its entirety and by substituting therefor the following:




     “Section 2.03 “Attained Age” shall mean the age of a Member as of his or her last
birthday. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of Section 4.02, the Attained Age of the CEO
shall be increased by six (6) years, unless the CEO’s employment is terminated for Cause (as such
term is defined in the CEO Employment Agreement).”



     2. Deleting Section 2.37 in its entirety and by substituting therefor the following:



     “Section 2.37 For purposes of determining a Member’s Vested Percentage, a “Year of
Service” shall mean a period of twelve (12) consecutive months commencing on the date that an
employee of the Employer first becomes a Member of this Plan, or on any anniversary of such date,
during which the Member completes at least One Thousand (1,000) Hours of Service (as defined in the
Qualified Plan); provided, however, that the Committee, in its sole discretion, may credit a Member
with Years of Service for purposes of determining such Member’s Vested Percentage with respect to
any period prior to the date that the Member first became a Member of this Plan, regardless of
whether the Member was an employee of the Employer during all or a portion of such prior period.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of calculating his Vested Percentage, the CEO shall be
credited with six (6) additional Years of Service, unless the CEO’s employment is terminated for
Cause (as such term is defined in the CEO Employment Agreement).”



4. Deleting Section 2.08 in its entirety and by substituting therefor the following:



     “Section 2.08 “CEO” shall mean the Chief Executive Officer of FirstMerit Corporation
as of January 8, 2009.”



1









 




5. The provisions of this Amendment that relate to Paul Greig shall only be modified or further
amended upon the mutual agreement of the Corporation and Paul Greig.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is adopted this 8th day of January, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Christopher J. Maurer	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Print Name:
	 	Christopher J. Maurer	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Executive Vice President — Human Resources	 	 






2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA-21-0557

ESTATE OF JAMES W. GROMILLER

Acting through Executrix Nancy Newhams,

 Plaintiff/Appellee,

vs.

ANDREW B. GROMILLER,

 Defendant/Appellant.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

DATED this _____ day of _______, _______.

____________________

Supreme Court Justice

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 12 2022

01/12/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0557