alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael Stephen MCKINNEY, DOC #391008, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2162

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32294]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to OMB for 
Review

December 19, 1994.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0732.
    Regulation ID Number: LR-236-81 Final (T.D. 8251).
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Credit for Increasing Research Activity.
    Description: This information is necessary to comply with 
requirements of Code section 41 (section 44F before change by Tax 
Reform Act (TRA) 1984 and section 30 before change by Tax Reform Act 
(TRA) 1986) which describes the situations in which a taxpayer is 
entitled to an income tax credit for increases in research activity.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, Businesses or other for- 
profit, Small businesses or organizations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 250.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 63 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-1291.
    Regulation ID Number: PS-78-91.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Procedure for Monitoring Compliance with Low-Income Housing 
Credit Requirements.
    Description: The regulations require state allocation plans to 
provide a procedure for State and local housing credit agencies to 
monitor for compliance with the requirements of section 42 and report 
any noncompliance to the Internal Revenue Service.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, State or local governments, 
Businesses or other for-profit, Non-profit institutions, Small 
businesses or organizations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 5,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 18,750 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 94-32294 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
McFaddin et al. v. ConAgra Brands, Inc., Case No.: 3:17-cv-387-WHA 

PLAINTIFFS’ CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE WESTON FIRM 

GREGORY S. WESTON (239944) 

greg@westonfirm.com 

ANDREW C. HAMILTON (299877) 

andrew@westonfirm.com 

1405 Morena Blvd., Suite 201 

San Diego, CA 92110 

Telephone: (619) 798-2006 

Facsimile: (313) 293-7071 

Counsel for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MARJEL MCFADDIN and MARK 

BEASLEY , on behalf of themselves and all 

others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CONAGRA BRANDS, INC. 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: 3:17-cv-387-WHA 

PLAINTIFFS’ CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF 

INTERESTED PARTIES

Case 3:17-cv-00387-WHA Document 23 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

McFaddin et al. v. ConAgra Brands, Inc., Case No.: 3:17-cv-387-WHA 

PLAINTIFFS’ CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD:

The undersigned certifies that as of this date, other than the named party, there is no such interest 

to report. 

DATED: March 2, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, 

 /s/ Gregory S. Weston 

 THE WESTON FIRM 

GREGORY S. WESTON 

ANDREW C. HAMILTON 

1405 Morena Blvd., Suite 201 

San Diego, CA 92110 

Telephone: (619) 798-2006 

Facsimile: (313) 293-7071 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 3:17-cv-00387-WHA Document 23 Filed 03/02/17 Page 2 of 2
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 686 

Designating July 23, 2022, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2022 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CRAPO, 

Ms. ERNST, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. KELLY, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

MORAN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. TESTER, Mr. 

THUNE, and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 23, 2022, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ‘‘cowboys’’, helped to establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliations; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 686 IS 

Whereas the cowboy, who lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment, is an excellent steward 

of the land and its creatures; 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy through the work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who contribute to the economic well-being of every State; 

Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working 

ranch rodeo events annually, making rodeo one of the 

most-watched sports in the United States; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

cowboys span every generation and transcend race and 

gender; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 23, 2022, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 686 IS 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

3 activities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 61

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-62 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7878** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. KENNETH LEE FOSTER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville
. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00013

- MR

- DLH

- 8 ; 1:12

- cv - 00315

- MR )

Submitted : March 25, 2014 Decided: May 2, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Kenneth Lee Foster , Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Louise Rikard, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas A. O’Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assis tant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Lee Foster seeks to appeal the dist rict court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the d istrict court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Foster has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument bec ause the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-72 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
Francesca BAZZICHELLI, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-1497

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019 Rehearing Denied MAY 29, 2019

The AJM Law Group, P.A. and Alix J. Montes, Miami, for appellant.

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz and Eve A. Cann (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

SALTER, J.

*415The borrower/defendant in a residential foreclosure case, Francesca Bazzichelli, appeals a post-judgment order denying her "Amended Objection to Issuance of Certificate of Title [and] Motion to Vacate Amended Final Judgment and February 2017 Sale," entered in July 2018. The final judgment of foreclosure was entered in April 2014 and amended to reflect a change in the name of the plaintiff (appellee here) five months later.

Following Ms. Bazzichelli's bankruptcy proceedings and a foreclosure sale in February 2017, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., Mortgage Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-QS7 ("Deutsche Bank"), moved to re-open the case to amend its name in the final judgment of foreclosure and certificate of title. Deutsche Bank alleged that the use of an erroneously-abbreviated name for Deutsche Bank in those documents had created an inadvertent title impediment affecting Deutsche Bank's sale of the property to a bona fide purchaser.

Though not denominated as such in the caption or body of the motion, the motion fits comfortably within the rule and case law applicable to the correction of "[c]lerical mistakes" in "judgments, decrees, or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission," which "may be corrected by the court at any time on its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(a) ; *see also**Keller v. Belcher*, 256 So.2d 561, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) ("clerical mistakes include only errors or mistakes arising from accidental slip or omission and not errors or mistakes in the substance of what is decided by the judgment or order."). Name changes are permitted under Rule 1.540(a) at any time. *Howard v. State*, 139 So.3d 975, 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Ms. Bazzichelli neither alleged nor proved that the amendment altered the substance of the final judgment of foreclosure or the certificate of title as to her. We also reject her further argument that she should be allowed to use the July 2018 order approving the amendment to the final judgment as a new occasion for seeking to have the entire foreclosure judgment and subsequent certificate of sale vacated. As the trial court properly ruled, any errors in the substance of the final judgment or the 2017 amendment should have been (but were not) raised on appeal from those rulings. *See**DeGale v. Krongold, Bass & Todd*, 773 So.2d 630, 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Ms. Bazzichelli's motion to vacate was properly denied.

Affirmed.
# C_2018064EN.01000401.xml

| 20.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 15 February 2018

renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2018/C 64/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nominee submitted to the Council by the Commission as regards the Employers' representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 14 July 2015 (2) and of 14 September 2015 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 14 July 2015 (2) and of 14 September 2015 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2018.

2

3

| (2) | A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of representatives of Employers' organisations has become vacant for Denmark as a result of the resignation of Mr Henrik Bach MORTENSEN. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of representatives of Employers' organisations has become vacant for Denmark as a result of the resignation of Mr Henrik Bach MORTENSEN.

| (3) | The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2018, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2018,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following person is hereby appointed member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of its term of office, which runs until 17 September 2018:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS:

| DENMARK | Mr Alex HOOSHIAR |
| --- | --- |

DENMARK

Mr Alex HOOSHIAR

Article 2

This Decision shall be published, for information, in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 15 February 2018.

For the Council

The President

K. VALCHEV

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 232, 16.7.2015, p. 2.

2

(3)  OJ C 305, 16.9.2015, p. 2.

3

---
Seventh Paragraph under Terms and Conditions of Offer




---



##### 



/s/
Steven R. Wasserman
 Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
  /s/ Nancie Freitas
Date: December 9, 2008Nancie Freitas




---



##### 



Exhibit A: Payments subject to Section 409A
      provided however




---



##### 








---



##### 



§
    
    You will be hired as Vice President of Acquisition Marketing, reporting to Richard
Turcott, Chief Marketing Officer.§
    
    Your starting base pay shall be at a semi-monthly rate of $6,666.67 (annualized this
equates to $160,000). You will be paid in accordance with the Companys normal payroll
practices as established or modified from time to time§
    
    You will be paid $5,000.00 as a sign on bonus in your first payroll
after your start date.§
    
    You will be eligible for a $40,000.00 yearly bonus paid on a quarterly basis during a
calendar year. The bonus will be based on meeting quarterly goals agreed upon with me.§
    
    Associated with the position will be participation in the Companys Stock Option Plan,
through an option for 25,000shares, subject to board approval, vesting over four years.
The vesting schedule is twenty-five percent (25%) after one full year of service and
quarterly thereafter (six and a quarter percent (6.25%) per quarter).§
    
    Beginning with your initial date of employment, as a full-time employee you will accrue
vacation at a rate of 20 days per calendar year, or 13.33 hours for each full month
employed.§
    
    If your employment with Constant Contact is terminated, without cause, during the first
year of employment or if the company moves more than 20 miles from its current location
you will receive a severance package of three months salary.§
    
    Your employment with Constant Contact will begin on January 11, 2006or as mutually
agreed. You will be expected to devote all of your working time to the performance of
your duties at Constant Contact throughout your employment with the Company. No provision
of this letter shall be construed to create an express or implied employment contract, or
a promise of employment for any specific period of time. Your employment with Constant
Contact is at-will and may be terminated by you or Constant Contact at any time for any
reason.§
    
    This offer is in effect until November 23, 2005.




---



##### 



/s/
Richard Turcott
 
 ACCEPTED:
    
    /s/ Nancie Freitas
    
    
    
    DATE:
    
    November 17, 2005
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
William Hopke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of
Espre Solutions, Inc., and Subsidiaries on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Espre Solutions, Inc. and
Subsidiaries.
 
 
 Dated:
      November 21, 2008
              By:  /s/ William
      HopkeWilliam
      Hopke, Chief Executive
Officer
Justin Tavarse BARGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3710

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Order entered June 8, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01351-CV

FELIX ECHENDU, Appellant

V.

GUSTAVO HUERTA AND HUERTA'S BODY SHOP, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-05211-E

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s June 3, 2016 motion to extend time to file amended brief and 

ORDER the amended brief received by the Court on June 6, 2016 timely filed as of the date of 

this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-31271

Summary Calendar

 

C.H. FAULKENBERRY, JR.,

Plaintiff,

versus

JOHN ELKINS ET AL.,

Defendants.

====================================================

DAVID L. SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

INTERNATIONAL BIOCHEMICALS GROUP, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC Nos. 95-CV-2041 and 85-CV-146

- - - - - - - - - -

November 19, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David L. Smith, assignee of C.H. Faulkenberry’s interest in

a 1986 consent judgment entered in the Middle District of
No. 97-31271

-2-

Louisiana against John Elkins, Benefit Systems, Inc., and Microbe

Masters, Inc. (“Microbe”), appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his petition to revive the consent judgment against

International Biochemicals Group, Inc. (“IBG”), Microbe’s

successor in interest. Smith argues that the district court

erred in determining that Microbe had been inadvertently included

in the consent judgment and that, even if Microbe had not been

served in the original action, Microbe voluntarily acquiesced in

the consent judgment, precluding IBG from asserting that the

consent judgment is null.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment dismissing the

petition to revive the consent judgment is affirmed. Smith’s

motion to incorporate the record and briefs filed in his previous

appeal is denied.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.