alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01646]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-704-705 and 731-TA-1664-1666 (Final)]

Paper Plates From China, Thailand, and Vietnam; Cancellation of 
Hearing for Final Phase Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Investigations

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: January 17, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stamen Borisson ((202) 205-3125), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective September 5, 2024, the Commission 
established a schedule for the final phase of these investigations (89 
FR 76508, September 18, 2024). On January 16, 2025, counsel for the 
American Paper Plate Coalition filed its request to appear at the 
hearing. No other parties submitted a request to appear at the hearing. 
On January 17, 2025, counsel withdrew their request to appear at the 
hearing. Counsel indicated a willingness to submit written responses to 
any Commission questions in lieu of an actual hearing. Consequently, 
the public hearing in connection with these investigations, scheduled 
to begin at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, January 23, 2025, is cancelled. 
Parties to these investigations should respond to any written questions 
posed by the Commission in their posthearing briefs, which are due to 
be filed on January 30, 2025.
    For further information concerning these investigations see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and 
part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).
    Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority 
of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 17, 2025.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-01646 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20225

VERNON KING, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

WARDEN C. G. CARTER: C. H. PRESTWOOD; C. S. LACOX; MAJOR 

LEMKER,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CV-832

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Vernon King, Jr., Texas prisoner # 590316, moves this court for 

authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court’s 

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. King has failed to show that he 

should be allowed to proceed IFP on appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) or that 

his appeal of the district court’s judgment presents a nonfrivolous issue. See

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 18, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-20225 Document: 00514478607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2018
No. 17-20225

2

Banos v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998); Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 

562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). King’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied.

The facts surrounding the IFP decision are inextricably intertwined with 

the merits of the appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th 

Cir. 1997). The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is dismissed as 

frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

 Case: 17-20225 Document: 00514478607 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/18/2018
Herbert MARSHALL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The RESERVE AT the PLANTATION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4866

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-42145) pertaining to The A Consulting Team, Inc. 1997 Stock Option
and Award Plan and Registration Statements on Form S-3 Nos. 333-38330, 333-42744
and 333-51084, of our report dated February 21, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of The A Consulting Team, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.




                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
March 30, 2001
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2008 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Howard Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC,
General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Date:
      January 25, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/ Howard
      MahName:
                    Howard
      MahTitle:
                    Chief
      Financial OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP
#### Tommie ANDERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellees.

No. 03-5252.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 26, 2004.

Tommie Anderson, Pollock, LA, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Before EDWARDS, SENTELLE, and RANDOLPH Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and supplement thereto filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment filed July 16, 2003, and its order filed August 15, 2003 be affirmed as modified below.

The district court correctly held that appellant must seek release by filing a *724motion to vacate his sentence in the sentencing court under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Furthermore, his damages claims are barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), and are barred as to some of the defendants by judicial, prosecutorial, and sovereign immunity. *See Stump v. Sparkman,*435 U.S. 349, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978); *Imbler v. Pachtman,*424 U.S. 409, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976); *Williams v. Hill,*74 F.3d 1339, 1341 (D.C.Cir.1996) (per curiam). As for appellant’s injunctive claims, “it is well-settled that a prisoner seeking relief from his conviction or sentence may not bring such an action,” *id.*at 1340, and appellant lacks standing to seek injunctive relief on behalf of others. Finally, construing the complaint as a habeas petition would not assist appellant because, as discussed above, he must seek release through a § 2255 motion filed in the sentencing court.

In light of the foregoing, the district court properly dismissed the case and denied reconsideration. We modify the district court’s judgment, however, to state that dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to pursue his claim for release in the proper forum and manner, and without prejudice to his right to pursue his damages claims against non-immune defendants upon meeting the requirements of *Heck v. Humphrey.*

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 In connection with the Report of SOLAR
ENERTECH CORP. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Leo Shi Young, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:February 13, 2009
              By:/s/ Leo Shi
      YoungLeo Shi
    YoungActing Chief Financial
      Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-5-2025]

Notice is hereby given of the withdrawal of the notification of proposed production activity submitted by Rincon Power, LLC for its facility in Carpinteria, California, within FTZ 205. The notification was docketed on January 30, 2025 (90 FR 9133-9134, February 7, 2025). The withdrawal was requested by Rincon Power, LLC on February 5, 2025.

Dated: February 7, 2025.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-02550 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50226 Conference Calendar

DENNIS JOE WEATHERLY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHIEF OF POLICE OF ROUND ROCK; UNKNOWN DETECTIVE, ROUND ROCK; Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-61

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1997 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dennis Joe Weatherly, Texas prisoner # 653950, appeals the district court's denial of his motion to extend time to file a motion for a new trial. The district court lacked the authority to extend the time for filing Weatherly's F ED . R. C IV . P. 59(b) motion. F ED . R. C IV . P. 6(b); Fairley v. Jones , 824 F.2d 440, 442 (5th Cir. 1987). Thus, this appeal lacks an arguable basis in law and is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d. 215, 219-20No. -2- (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Clarence PERKINS Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-1107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
Problemas del sueño 

Datos básicos sobre dormir 

La mayoría de los adultos necesitan de siete 

a ocho horas de sueño todas las noches. Pero 

no todas las personas duermen todo lo que 

necesitan. 

Es posible que de vez en cuando usted tenga 

dificultad para dormir debido a: 

• estrés 

• problemas de salud y medicamentos 

• demasiadas horas de trabajo/ trabajo por 

turnos 

• la luz o los ruidos 

• beber alcohol o comer muy cerca de la hora 

de acostarse 

Si la mayoría de las noches tiene dificultad para 

dormir o permanecer dormido, usted podría 

tener un problema del sueño llamado insomnio. 

Algunas personas tienen problemas del sueño 

más graves. Hable con su médico si: 

• se queda dormido durante el día; 

• ronca o emite sonidos de ahogo mientras 

duerme; 

• piernas o siente le necesidad de moverlas. 

Medicamentos para ayudarle a 

dormir 

Hay medicamentos que le ayudan a quedarse 

dormido y a permanecer dormido. Necesitará 

una receta médica para algunos de los 

medicamentos para dormir. Pero, hay otros 

medicamentos de este tipo que podrá comprar 

sin receta médica. 

Receta médica 

Los medicamentos para dormir que se compran 

con receta médica funcionan bien para muchas 

personas, pero también pueden causar efectos 

secundarios graves. 

• Hable con su médico sobre todos los riesgos y 

los beneficios de utilizar medicamentos para el 

sueño comprados con receta médica. 

• Los medicamentos contra el insomnio pueden 

limitar su capacidad para conducir automóviles 

durante la mañana siguiente después de 

haberlos tomado. 

• Los medicamentos para dormir pueden causar 

efectos secundarios poco comunes como:

- reacciones alérgicas graves

- hinchazón grave de la cara

- comportamientos como por ejemplo, 

hacer llamadas telefónicas, comer, tener 

relaciones sexuales o conducir sin estar 

completamente despierto.

La Oficina de Salud de la Mujer de la FDA • www.fda.gov/womens
 
Problemas del sueño 

Continuación 

Medicamentos que se venden sin 

receta médica (OTC, por sus siglas 

en inglés) 

Los medicamentos para el sueño que se 

venden sin receta médica también causan 

efectos secundarios. Para conocer mejor 

los efectos secundarios de su medicamento 

vendido sin receta médica, lea la información 

incluida en la “Drug Facts Label”. 

Hable con su proveedor de servicios de salud 

si tiene problemas para dormir casi todas las 

noches, durante más de dos semanas. 

Consejos para dormir mejor 

Hacer algunos cambios a sus hábitos nocturnos 

puede ayudarle a obtener el sueño que necesita. 

• Acuéstese y levántese a la misma hora todos 

los días. 

• Duerma en una habitación oscura y silenciosa. 

• Evite la cafeína y la nicotina. 

• No beba alcohol antes de acostarse. 

• Antes de acostarse, haga algo que lo ayude 

a relajarse. 

• Evite hacer ejercicio antes de la hora 

de acostarse. 

• No duerma la siesta después de las tres de 

la tarde. 

• No coma mucho antes de acostarse. 

La Oficina de Salud de la Mujer de la FDA desarrolló esta hoja informativa. 

Para obtener otros recursos para la salud de la mujer, vaya a 

www.fda.gov/womens 2017
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Xinyinhai Technology,
Ltd. (the “Company”) certify that:
  1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
  2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 August
      12, 2008
              /s/ Tian
      LingTian
      Ling (Chief Executive Officer)/s/ Du SongDu
      Song (Chief Financial Officer )
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     Exhibit 21


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF CHOICEPOINT INC.


<TABLE>
<S>                                                                     <C>
Bti LP                                                                  Texas
ChoicePoint Asset Company                                               Delaware
ChoicePoint Business and Government Services Inc.                       Georgia
ChoicePoint Capital Inc.                                                Delaware
ChoicePoint Financial Inc.                                              Delaware
ChoicePoint Health Systems Inc.                                         Kansas
ChoicePoint Licensing Company                                           Delaware
ChoicePoint Precision Marketing Inc.                                    Georgia
ChoicePoint Police Records Inc.                                         Arizona
ChoicePoint Public Records Inc.                                         Georgia
ChoicePoint Services Inc.                                               Georgia
CPPM Inc.                                                               Georgia
DataMart Processing LLC                                                 Georgia
EquiSearch Services Inc.                                                Georgia
Insurity Inc.                                                           Georgia
KnowX LLC                                                               Georgia
National Credit Audit Corporation                                       Illinois
National Data Retrieval, Inc.                                           Georgia
National Safety Alliance, Incorporated                                  Tennessee
Patlex Corporation                                                      Pennsylvania
Resident Data Financial, LLC                                            Texas
Resident Data, Inc.                                                     Delaware
The Bode Technology Group, Inc.                                         Virginia
The List Source, Inc.                                                   Texas
Vital Chek Network, Inc.                                                Tennessee
Vital Chek Network of Canada, Inc.                                      Delaware
</TABLE>
##### 



SEPARATION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
  Separation Date:
 Release
 Noncompete:




---



##### 



Acknowledgment:
 (a)
    
    The execution of this Agreement shall not constitute any admission
by Novelis that it has violated any federal, state or local statute, ordinance,
rule, regulation or common law, or that Employee has any meritorious claims
whatsoever against Novelis.(b)
    
    No promise or inducement has been offered to Employee, except as
herein set forth;(c)
    
    This Agreement is being executed voluntarily and knowingly by
Employee and Novelis without reliance upon any statements by others or their
representatives concerning the nature or extent of any claims or damages or
legal liability therefore;(d)
    
    This Agreement has been written in understandable language, and all
provisions hereof are understood by Employee and Novelis;(e)
    
    Employee is advised, and has had an opportunity, to consult with an
attorney of Employees own choosing prior to executing this Agreement;(f)
    
    Employee will receive, pursuant to this Agreement, a taxable lump
sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), which is consideration in addition
to anything of value to which the Employee is already entitled;(g)
    
    Employee has twenty-one (21) days from the receipt of this Agreement
in which to decide whether to enter into this Agreement, sign it and return it
to Bob Virtue at Novelis Human Resource Department, at 3399 Peachtree Rd. NE,
Suite 1500 Atlanta, GA 30326 The Employee may sign this Agreement and return it
to Bob Virtue prior to the expiration of the 21-day period; and(h)
    
    Employee has the right to revoke this Agreement during the seven (7)
day period by mailing a letter of revocation to Bob Virtue at the above address.
Such a letter must be signed and received by Novelis no later than the seventh
day after the date on which Employee signed the Agreement. This Agreement shall
not become effective or enforceable until the seven (7) day revocation period
expires.(i)
    
    This Agreement shall be governed by the law of Georgia.
 
 2




---



##### 



Entirety of Agreement:
 Severability:
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 /s/ David
Godsell
    
    /s/ Bob VirtueEmployee
    
    Novelis Inc.November 12, 2007
    
    November 12, 2007Date
    
    Date
 3
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 20 (Friday, January 31, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8716-8717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02050]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1123 (Third Review)]

Steel Wire Garment Hangers From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on steel wire 
garment hangers from China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Schmidtlein not participating.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 8717]]

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on July 1, 2024 (89 FR 54519) 
and determined on October 4, 2024, that it would conduct an expedited 
review (89 FR 89040, November 12, 2024).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on January 27, 2025. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5580 (January 2025), 
entitled Steel Wire Garment Hangers from China: Investigation No. 731-
TA-1123 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 28, 2025.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-02050 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Enrique OLIVERA, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2303

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 09, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.