The Honorable Rob Baiamonte 

Goliad County Attorney 

Post Office Box 24 

Goliad, Texas 77963 

GREG ABBOTT 

April 24,2007 

Opinion No. GA-0542 

Re: Whether abandoned vehicles seized by the 

county sheriff must be disposed of pursuant to 

Transportation Code chapter 683 or Code of 

Criminal Procedure article 18.17 (RQ-0549-GA) 

Dear Mr. Baiamonte: 

You ask about the proper disposition of abandoned vehicles seized by the Goliad County 

Sheriff (the "Sheriff').' You inform us that undocumented persons traveling by motor vehicle 

through Goliad County, Texas, when stopped by law enforcement officers, "often times. . . run[] out 

of the vehicle into the brush, never to be seen again, [and] meanwhile the vehicle is abandoned on 

the side of the road." Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1 .2 The Sheriff "immediately hauls the vehicle 

down to his yard" for health and safety reasons and, after attempting to notify the vehicles' owners, 

sells the vehicles at an auction or retains them pursuant to chapter 683 of the Transportation Code, 

which authorizes the disposition of abandoned motor vehicles. Id. ; Brief, supra note 1, at 1 ; see 

TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. 5 5 683.001-.016 (Vernon 1999 & Supp. 2006). More recently, the Sheriff 

has loaned the retained vehicles to other county departments, such as the commissioners court, 

emergency management, the county extension office, and the courthouse maintenance department. 

See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1. 

You initially ask whether the seized vehicles must be disposed of pursuant to Transportation 

Code chapter 683 or pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 18.17, which authorizes the 

disposition of seized unclaimed or abandoned personal property. Id. at 2; see TEX. CODE CRIM. 

PROC. ANN. art. 18.17 (Vernon 2005). You suggest that article 18.17 governs the disposition of 

these vehicles. See Brief, supra note 1, at 1. But if we conclude that chapter 683 is the governing 

'See Letter from Honorable Rob Baiamonte, Goliad County Attorney, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Attorney 

General of Texas, at 1-2 (Oct. 20, 2006) (on file with the Opinion Committee, also available at 

http:llwww.oag.state.tx.us) [hereinafter Request Letter]; see also Brief from Honorable Rob Baiamonte, Goliad County 

Attorney, at 1-2 (attached to Request Letter) [hereinafter Brief]. 

'You do not inform us why the vehicles are stopped. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1-2. 
The Honorable Rob Baiamonte - Page 2 (GA-0542) 

statute, you ask three additional questions related to vehicle use and disposition under that ~tatute.~ 

See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2. 

I. Transportation Code Chapter 683 

We first consider chapter 683 of the Transportation Code. Chapter 683 authorizes a law 

enforcement agency to "take into custody an abandoned motor vehicle . . . found on public or private 

property" and to dispose of it. TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. $5 683.01 1 (custody), 683.014 (auction or 

use) (Vernon Supp. 2006). For the purposes of chapter 683, a "law enforcement agency" includes 

"a sheriff or a constable." Id. $ 683.001(3)(D). If an owner or a lienholder does not claim the 

vehicle after notice is given regarding the abandoned vehicle, "the law enforcement agency may sell 

the item at a public auction, transfer the item, if a watercraft, [to the Parks and Wildlife Department], 

or use the item as provided by Section 683 .016." Id. $683.0 14(a)(2); see id. $683.0 12 (providing 

for notice). Under section 683 .016, the law enforcement agency that takes the unclaimed abandoned 

vehicle into custody "may use the vehicle for agency purposes" and "shall auction the vehicle . . . if the agency discontinues use of the vehicle." Id. $ 683.0 16(a)-(b). 

By its terms, chapter 683 authorizes law enforcement officers to take into custody only 

"abandoned vehicles." See id. tj 683.0 1 1 ; see also McIntyre v. Ramirez, 109 S. W.3d 74 1,745 (Tex. 

2003) ("If the statutory language is unambiguous, we will interpret the statute according to its plain 

meaning."). Section 683.002 specifically defines the class of motor vehicles that are abandoned for 

the purposes of the statute: A motor vehicle is abandoned if the vehicle 

(1) is inoperable, is more than five years old, and has been 

left unattended on public property for more than 48 hours; 

(2) has remained illegally on public property for more than 

48 hours; 

3Yo~r three questions related specifically to Transportation Code chapter 683 are: 

(1) Can a vehicle retained by the Sheriffs Office under fj 683.016 be put into 

service by another county department? 

(2) Is it sufficient when retaining an abandoned vehicle by law enforcement to fill 

in the TX DOT form "no sale, to be used for law enforcement purposes only as per 

Transportation Code [fj] 683.034" or should the retained vehicle go through the 

auction and [be] purchased by the Sheriffs Department? 

(3) Are the proceeds from the Chapter 683 vehicle auction considered a "new 

source" by the Auditor pursuant to fj 11 1.0108 of the Texas Local Government 

Code? 

Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2. 
The Honorable Rob Baiamonte - Page 3 (GA-0542) 

(3) has remained on private property without the consent of 

the owner or person in charge of the property for more than 48 hours; 

(4) has been left unattended on the right-of-way of a 

designated county, state, or federal highway for more than 48 hours; 

(5) has been left unattended for more than 24 hours on the 

right-of-way of a turnpike project constructed and maintained by the 

Texas Turnpike Authority division of the Texas Department of 

Transportation or a controlled access highway; or 

(6) is considered an abandoned motor vehicle under Section 

644.153(r) [impounded commercial vehicles subject to administrative 

penalty]. 

TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. 5 683.002(a) (Vernon Supp. 2006) (emphasis added). A vehicle that does 

not fall within the defined class under section 683.002 is not an abandoned motor vehicle for the 

purposes of chapter 683. See id.; see also Old Am. County Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Sanchez, 149 

S.W.3d 11 1, 115 (Tex. 2004) ("[Wle presume that every word of a statute has been included or 

excluded for a reason. . . ."); City ofMarshal1 v. City of Uncertain, 206 S.W.3d 97,105 (Tex. 2006) 

(quoting City of Sun Antonio v. City ofBoerne, 1 1 1 S.W.3d 22,29 (Tex. 2003)) ("It is an elementary 

rule of construction that, when possible to do so, effect must be given to every sentence, clause, and 

word of a statute so that no part thereof be rendered superfluous."). 

An abandoned motor vehicle subject to the statute, as relevant here, would be a vehicle 

remaining illegally on public property or left unattended for at least 48 hours. See TEX. TRANSP. 

CODE ANN. § 683.002(a)(2), (4) (Vernon Supp. 2006). The motor vehicles in question, however, 

are not left unattended for 48 hours. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1 ; Brief, supra note 1, 

at 1. Instead, for health and safety reasons, they are removed immediately after the occupants flee 

the vehicles when stopped by law enforcement officers. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1 ("Our 

Sheriff immediately hauls the vehicle down to his yard . . . ."); Brief, supra note 1, at 1 ("The 

Sheriffs position is [that] the vehicle is a health and safety issue and cannot remain there 48 hours[;] 

therefore he removes it immediately to his impound lot."). While chapter 683 leaves unaffected any 

other "law authorizing the immediate removal of a vehicle left on public property that is an 

obstruction to traffic[,]" it does not contain a health and safety exception to the abandoned vehicle 

criteria or authorize immediate removal of a vehicle for health and safety reasons. See TEX. TRANSP. 

CODE ANN. 5 683.002(a) (Vernon Supp. 2006), 5 683.003(b) (Vernon 1999). The motor vehicles 

in question therefore are not "abandoned" within the meaning of chapter 683, and the statute's 

disposition procedures do not apply to them. 

11. Code of Criminal Procedure Article 18.17 

We next consider article 18.17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This article provides in 

relevant part as follows: 
The Honorable Rob Baiamonte - Page 4 (GA-0542) 

All unclaimed or abandoned personal property of every kind, 

other than contraband subject to forfeiture under Chapter 59 of this 

code . . . , seized by any peace officer in the State of Texas which is 

not held as evidence to be used in any pending case and has not been 

ordered destroyed or returned to the person entitled to possession of 

the same by a magistrate, which shall remain unclaimed for a period 

of 30 days shall be delivered for disposition to . . . the purchasing 

agent of the county in which the property was seized. . . . If [a] peace 

officer [other than a municipal peace officer] seizes the property, the 

peace officer shall deliver the property to the purchasing agent of the 

county. If the county has no purchasing agent, then such property 

shall be disposed of by the sheriff of the county. 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 18.17(a) (Vernon 2005). The county purchasing agent or the 

sheriff must give notice stating that if the owner does not claim the property within 90 days of the 

notice date, the property will be disposed of and the proceeds, less the cost of maintenance and 

disposal of the property, placed in the county treasury. See id. art. 18.17(b) (mailed notice), (c) 

(published notice); see also id. art. 18.17(d) (sale to be preceded by 14-day notice), (i) (insufficient 

bid and reoffer). 

But property scheduled for disposition under article 18.17 need not be sold. See id. art. 

18.17(d). The "county law enforcement agency that originally seized the property may request and 

have the property converted to agency use." Id. art. 18.17(g). Additionally, the seizing agency "may 

transfer the property to another . . . county law enforcement agency for the use of that agency." Id. 

We look at the prerequisites for the application of article 18.17 and consider whether they 

are met here. Initially, the seized motor vehicles in question are personal property as required by the 

statute. See San Antonio Area Found. v. Lang, 35 S.W.3d 636, 640 (Tex. 2000) (citing Erwin v. 

Steele, 228 S.W.2d 882, 885 (Tex. Civ. App.-Dallas 1950, writ ref d n.r.e.)) ("Personal property 

is defined broadly to include everything that is subject to ownership not falling under the definition 

of real estate."). Additionally, the vehicles are not excluded from the application of the statute by 

virtue of their being held as evidence for use in a pending case or ordered to be destroyed or returned 

to the rightful owners or holders: You inform us that because "there is rarely an arrest in these 

cases[,] there are no charges brought and no evidence that needs to be held" and "no case is ever 

filed." Brief, supra note 1, at 1. 

We cannot, however, determine as a matter of law that the seized vehicles meet the remaining 

two relevant statutory requirements. First, because article 18.17 is a criminal procedural statute, it 

necessarily governs the disposition of personal property seized by a peace officer in connection with 

the enforcement of the state's criminal laws. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 18.17(a) 

(Vernon 2005). The express purpose of the entirety of the Code of Criminal Procedure is to "govern 

all criminal proceedings" and to "embrace rules applicable to the prevention and prosecution of 

offenses against the laws ofthis State." Id. arts. 1.02, .03; see also Curry v. Wilson, 853 S.W.2d 40, 

43 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (explaining that "criminal law matters" are "[dlisputes which arise over 
The Honorable Rob Baiamonte - Page 5 (GA-0542) 

the enforcement of statutes governed by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and which arise as 

a result of or incident to a criminal prose~ution").~ Second, article 18.17 excludes from its operation 

contraband that is disposed of pursuant to chapter 59 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. 

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 18.17(a) (Vernon 2005); see also id. art. 59.01(2) (Vernon 2006) 

(defining "contraband" generally as property (1) used in the commission of a first or second degree 

felony or (2) used or intended to be used in the commission of one of the offenses specifically listed 

in the definition). 

You do not ask about or describe the circumstances surrounding the seizure of a particular 

vehicle. More importantly, whether a particular vehicle was seized in connection with the 

enforcement of the criminal laws and, relatedly, whether or not it is contraband raise questions of 

fact as to the offense or potential offense for which the vehicle was initially stopped or for which the 

occupants may be prosecuted. CJ: TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. 5 1.03(a) (Vernon 2003) ("Conduct does 

not constitute an offense unless it is defined as an offense by statute, municipal ordinance, order of 

a county commissioners court, or rule authorized by and lawfully adopted under a statute."). This 

office does not find facts or resolve fact questions in the opinion process. See, e.g., Tex. Att'y Gen. 

Op. Nos. GA-0446 (2006) at 18 ("Questions of fact are not appropriate to the opinion process."); 

GA-0 106 (2003) at 7 ("This office cannot find facts or resolve fact questions in an attorney general 

opinion."). Thus, we can advise you only that the vehicles are subject to the disposition provisions 

of article 18.17 if they are (1) seized in connection with the enforcement of the state's criminal laws 

and (2) not contraband subject to disposition under Code of Criminal Procedure chapter 59. 

111. Conclusion 

In answer to your initial question, we conclude that Transportation Code chapter 683 does 

not apply to the disposition of the seized motor vehicles in question. The vehicles may be disposed 

of pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 18.17 if they are (1) seized in connection with the 

enforcement of the state's criminal laws and (2) not contraband subject to disposition under Code 

of Criminal Procedure chapter 59. We do not answer your remaining three questions, which are 

predicated on a conclusion that Transportation Code chapter 683 governs the disposition of these . 

motor vehicles. 

4See also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. C-649 (1966) at 2 ("Article 18.30 [predecessor to article 18.171 is a criminal 

procedural statute and would cover only such property as is seized in the course of criminal investigations or proceedings 

or when possession was obtained by a peace officer through some activity related to the enforcement of the penal code 

ofthis State."); C-585 (1966) at 4 (stating that the article 18.30 provision "should govern the disposition of all property 

coming into the possession of law enforcement officers in connection with the enforcement of criminal laws unless there 

is another special statute providing for disposition"). 
The Honorable Rob Baiamonte - Page 6 (GA-0542) 

SUMMARY 

Transportation Code chapter 683 does not apply to the 

disposition of motor vehicles that a county sheriff seizes immediately 

after the occupants flee the vehicles when stopped by law 

enforcement. The seized motor vehicles, which are neither held as 

evidence in a pending case nor ordered to be destroyed or returned to 

the rightful owners, may be disposed of pursuant to Code of Criminal 

Procedure article 18.17 if they are (1) seized in connection with the 

enforcement of the state's criminal laws and (2) not contraband 

subject to disposition under Code of Criminal Procedure chapter 59. 

Very truly yours, A 

BBOTT 

Attorn neral of Texas 

KENT C. SULLIVAN 

First Assistant Attorney General 

ELLEN L. WITT 

Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel 

NANCY S. FULLER 

Chair, Opinion Committee 

Sheela Rai 

Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee