alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 30331 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MICHAEL IRBY , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:13

- CR

- 111

- 1

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Irby has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Irby has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed
to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Irby ’s claims of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 24 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-30331 Document: 00512946062 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015No. 14

- 30331

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 135 S. Ct. 123 ( 201 4). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Irby ’s response. We concur with counsel’s

assessme nt that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Irby’s request to proceed pro se is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998).

2 Case: 14-30331 Document: 00512946062 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
John Edward STROLE, DOC #266676, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1455

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| 1. |    | Registration Statement No. 333-154731 on Form S-3 of SinoHub, Inc., as most recently amended by Post Effective Amendment No. 1;                                                    |
|----|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. |    | Registration Statement No. 333-162767 on Form S-3 of SinoHub, Inc.;                                                                                                                     |
| 3. |    | Registration Statement No. 333-165360 on Form S-3 of  SinoHub, Inc.;                                                                                                               |
| 4. |    | Registration Statement No. 333-171540 on Form S-3 of SinoHub, Inc.; and                                                                                                                 |
| 5. |    | Registration Statement No. 333-160808 on Form S-8 pertaining to the SinoHub, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Plan and the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan of SinoHub International, Inc. |

----
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 3:17-cv-00543-SK Document 2 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 2
SUMMONS	ATTACHMENT

BMW	OF	NORTH	AMERICA,	LLC,	a	Delaware	Limited	Liability	Company;	and	BAYERISCHE	

MOTOREN	WERKE	AG,	a	German	Corporation,

Plaintiffs

v.

K	VIP	AUTO	BODY,	a	California	Corporation;	GUO	YONG	CHEN,	an	Individual;	JINGJING	DENG	

a/k/a	TINA	DENG,	an	Individual;	SHAO	CHUN	CHEN,	an	Individual;	FEN	DENG	a/k/a	ANDY	DENG,	

an	Individual;	and	DOES	1-10,	Inclusive,

Defendants.

Case 3:17-cv-00543-SK Document 2 Filed 02/02/17 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Awards and Facilities (A&F) hereby gives notice of the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE:

The A&F meeting will be held on Monday, February 10, 2025. The open session will be from 2:30 p.m.-3:00 p.m. The closed session will be from 3:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

The meetings will be held at NSF headquarters, 2145 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314, and by videoconference.

# STATUS:

One session is open, and one session is closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

*A&F open session agenda:*                         Opening Remarks; Information Item: Summit Station Recapitalization.                    

*A&F closed session agenda:*                         Opening Remarks regarding the agenda; Discussion and Vote: National Radio Astronomy Observatory Operations and Maintenance Award Authorization Level Increase; Context Item: Mid-scale Research Infrastructure Program Track 2; Context Item: National Geophysical Facility.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Michelle McCrackin,                         *mmccrack@nsf.gov,*                         (703) 292-7000. Members of the public can observe the public portion of this meeting through a YouTube livestream:                         *https://youtube.com/​live/​45FMoMrZar8?​feature=​share.*

Ann E. Bushmiller,

Senior Legal Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2025-02403 Filed 2-5-25; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield Asset Management Barbados Inc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  Dated:  April 30, 2013  /s/   Samuel PollockSamuel   PollockCEO,   Brookfield Infrastructure Group Corporation
EX PARTE LIBERTY RENT GUARANTEE, LLC

1161057

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-442]





Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, January 13, 1995.

PLACE: 2033 K St., NW, Washington, DC, 8th Floor Hearing Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-254-6314.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 94-442 Filed 1-4-95; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Jamal L. EDWARDS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1150

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTS. TO APPROVE REQUEST FOR INT’L JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE IN PROCURING KOREAN EVIDENCE

Case Nos. 5:17-CV-00220-LHK-NMC, 5:17-md-02773-LHK-NMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jennifer Milici, D.C. Bar No. 987096

J. Alexander Ansaldo, Va. Bar No. 75870

Joseph R. Baker, D.C. Bar No. 490802

Rajesh S. James, N.Y. Bar No. 4209367

Kenneth H. Merber, D.C. Bar No. 985703

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

(202) 326-3695; (202) 326-3496 (fax)

jmilici@ftc.gov

Lin W. Kahn, Cal. Bar No. 261387

Federal Trade Commission

901 Market Street, Suite 570

San Francisco, CA 94103

(415) 848-5115; (415) 848-5184 (fax)

lkahn@ftc.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Kalpana Srinivasan (237460)

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950

Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029

Telephone: (310) 789-3100

Facsimile: (310) 789-3150

Email: ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com

Steven N. Williams (175481)

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

Telephone: (650) 697-6000

Facsimile: (650) 697-0577

Email: swilliams@cpmlegal.com

MDL Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a Delaware 

corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK-NMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO APPROVE REQUEST FOR 

INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL 

ASSISTANCE IN PROCURING 

EVIDENCE FROM KOREAN NONPARTIES

IN RE: QUALCOMM ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION

ALL ACTIONS

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 179 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 2
2

PLAINTIFFS’ MOT. TO APPROVE REQUEST FOR INT’L JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE IN PROCURING KOREAN EVIDENCE

Case Nos. 5:17-CV-00220-LHK-NMC, 5:17-md-02773-LHK-NMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Unopposed Motion of Plaintiffs Federal Trade Commission (Case No. 5:17-

cv-00220) and MDL plaintiffs (Case No. 5:17-md-02773) to Approve Requests for

International Judicial Assistance in Procuring Evidence from Korean Non-Parties 

(“Motion”) is before this Court.

Having considered all papers filed in support of the Motion and Defendant’s nonopposition, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is 

GRANTED as set forth below. The Court will:

1. Sign and affix its seal to the Letters of Request to the appropriate Judicial 

Authority in Korea for Samsung and LGE, attached to the Declaration of Rajesh James

submitted in support of the Motion; and

2. Return the same with original signatures and seals to Plaintiffs’ counsel 

for forwarding to the appropriate Judicial Authority of Korea.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________ ____________________________

Hon. Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 179 Filed 08/24/17 Page 2 of 2
# C_2019373EN.01002601.xml

| 5.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/26

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2018/C 100/09 of 14 March 2018 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of an application for amendment of a specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Chianti Classico (PDO))

(Official Journal of the European Union C 100 of 16 March 2018)

(2019/C 373/09)

On page 10, in the Annex, section 4 ‘Description of the wine(s)’, Chianti Classico Gran Selezione, in the table ‘General analytical characteristics’:

for:

| ‘Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre) | 130’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)

130’

read:

| ‘Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)’ | |
| --- | --- |

‘Maximum total sulphur dioxide (in milligrams per litre)’

---
Korey Der'renard GUNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5062

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 16, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender; and David A. Henson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General; and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Mr. Gunn appeals his conviction for robbery, and challenges his sentence in two respects. We reject his new-trial argument and affirm his conviction, but reverse his sentence and remand for resentencing before a different judge.

In an order rejecting Mr. Gunn's motion to correct sentencing error, the trial judge wrote the following:

> Given the fact that Defendant committed the robbery in this case while on probation, it was always the intent of this Court that Defendant serve his prison sentence in this case consecutively to his VOP prison sentences. This Court's intent was known to the parties, including Defendant personally, prior to the trial in this case. Because this Court imposed the sentence that it intended to impose, Defendant's claim is without merit.

Sentencing judges must be impartial and not predisposed to a particular sentencing outcome. *Cromartie v. State* , 70 So. 3d 559, 564 (Fla. 2011) (invalidating sentence entered under a judge's stated policy of always rounding sentences up to the next whole year). Similarly in this case, the trial judge erred by having a predetermined, pretrial intention to sentence Mr. Gunn consecutively. We therefore vacate Mr. Gunn's sentence and remand for resentencing before a different judge.

REVERSED.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Companies.
 /s/ Erik OlssonErik OlssonPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
March 14, 2008/s/ David MathiesonDavid MathiesonSenior Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer
March 14, 2008
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00343

- CR

IN RE PHILIP CAMERON CARTER

Original Proceeding

From the 278th District Court

Madison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13,690

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s Original Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed on December 20, 2021, is

denied. Relator’s Motion for Emergency Temporary R elief is dismissed as moot.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Petition denied

Motion dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 2 1 , 2021

Do not publish

[OT06]
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 545 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 545

  Designating the week beginning March 13, 2022, as ``National Tribal 
                   Colleges and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2022

  Mr. Tester (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Warren, Ms. Smith, Ms. 
    Baldwin, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Lujan, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Padilla, Mr. 
  Heinrich, Mr. Daines, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Lankford, Mr. 
 Inhofe, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Moran) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week beginning March 13, 2022, as ``National Tribal 
                   Colleges and Universities Week''.

Whereas there are 35 accredited Tribal Colleges and Universities operating on 
        more than 75 campuses in 15 States;
Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are tribally chartered or federally 
        chartered institutions of higher education and therefore have a unique 
        relationship with the Federal Government;
Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities serve students from more than 230 
        federally recognized Indian tribes;
Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities offer students access to knowledge and 
        skills grounded in cultural traditions and values, including indigenous 
        languages, which--

    (1) enhances Indian communities; and

    (2) enriches the United States as a Nation;

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities provide access to high-quality 
        postsecondary educational opportunities for--

    (1) American Indians;

    (2) Alaska Natives; and

    (3) other individuals that live in some of the most isolated and 
economically depressed areas in the United States;

Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities are accredited institutions of higher 
        education that prepare students to succeed in the global and highly 
        competitive workforce;
Whereas Tribal Colleges and Universities have open enrollment policies, and 
        approximately 15 percent of the students at Tribal Colleges and 
        Universities are non-Indian individuals; and
Whereas the collective mission and the considerable achievements of Tribal 
        Colleges and Universities deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning March 13, 2022, as 
        ``National Tribal Colleges and Universities Week''; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups to observe ``National Tribal Colleges and Universities 
        Week'' with appropriate activities and programs to demonstrate 
        support for Tribal Colleges and Universities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Jason D. Davis, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Blue Moose Media, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 18, 2009  /s/ Jason D. Davis Jason D. Davis President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Blue Moose Media, Inc. and will be retained by Blue Moose Media, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 15(a)






Texas Utilities Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of Texas Utilities Company and
subsidiaries (the "Company") for the periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, as
indicated in our report dated August 13, 1998; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998,
is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-55931,
333-27989, 333-32831 and 333-56055 on Form S-3; Registration Statement No.
333-47135 on Form S-4; and Registration Statements No. 333-32833, 333-32835,
333-32837, 333-32839, 333-32841, 333-32843, 333-45657 and 333-46671 on Form
S-8 of Texas Utilities Company.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP


Dallas, Texas
August 13, 1998
PILOT AIR FREIGHT CORP., d/b/a Pilot Freight Services, Appellant, v. ACCESS TELECOM INC., Appellee.

No. 3D17-1030

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.