alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AllianceRecovery Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, I, Peter Vaisler, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alliance Recovery Corporationhereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that: 

 
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Alliance Recovery Corporation. |

 

**ALLIANCE RECOVERY CORPORATION**

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Peter Vaisler*

Peter VaislerChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Dated: August 10, 2005
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 597 

Recognizing the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities National 

Internship Program on the 30th anniversary of the program and celebrating its legacy of increasing diversity in the Federal Government 

and the private sector. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

LUJA ́N, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. BOOKER, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities National Internship Program on the 30th anniversary of the program and celebrating its legacy of increasing diversity in the Federal Government and the private 

sector. 

Whereas 2022 marks the 30th anniversary of the Hispanic 

Association of Colleges and Universities National Internship Program (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘HNIP’’); 

Whereas the HNIP began with 24 interns in the summer of 

1992 and has grown to a year-round internship program 

for Hispanic and underrepresented students, placing over 

500 interns every year in multiple Federal agencies; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 597 ATS 

Whereas, in 2020, the Hispanic population accounted for 

62,100,000, or 18.7 percent, of the total United States 

population; 

Whereas, according to the Annual Report to the President on 

Hispanic Employment in the Federal Government for 

Fiscal Year 2018 by the Office of Personnel Management, only 9.1 percent of Federal employees were Hispanic and only 3.3 percent were in Senior Executive 

Service positions; 

Whereas the HNIP has been cited in the Hispanic Nine 

Point Plan by the Office of Personnel Management as a 

resource to increase the recruitment of Hispanic interns 

in the Federal Government; and 

Whereas the HNIP has produced over 14,000 alumni who 

are now in the Federal Government, State or local government, and private industry: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the Hispanic Association of Col3 leges and Universities National Internship Program 

4 (referred to in this resolving clause as ‘‘HNIP’’) for 

5 30 years of providing internship opportunities to 

6 Hispanic and underrepresented students attending 

7 Hispanic-serving institutions and other institutions 

8 of higher education; 

9 (2) congratulates all HNIP alumni who con10 tinue to make a difference in the communities of the 

11 United States; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 597 ATS 

1 (3) encourages the Hispanic Association of Col2 leges and Universities to continue to support and in3 spire future Hispanic and underrepresented leaders. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Denise Houghtaling, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Majic Wheels Corp, certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to her knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant.



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                         |                    |                                                                                       
|------------------------ | ------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 21, 2011 | MAJIC WHEELS CORP.
|                         |                    |                                                                                       
|                         |                    |                                                                                       
|                         | By:                | / s/ Denise Houghtaling                                                               
|                         | Name:              | Denise Houghtaling                                                                    
|                         | Title:             | Chief Executive Officer, Chief                                                        
|                         |                    | Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
|                         |                   





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-485651

NO. 2019-BA-0894

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule XVII, § 4(C).
EXHIBIT 13

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK Document 78-13 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK Document 78-13 Filed 12/31/18 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD LEE CANADA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MACOMBER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00032-JST (PR)

ORDER OF TRANSFER

Plaintiff has filed a pro se request for a temporary restraining order complaining of 

conditions at California State Prison–Sacramento (“CSP-SAC”). CSP-SAC is located in 

Sacramento County within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). 

No defendant is alleged to reside in, and none of the events or omissions giving rise to the action 

occurred in, the Northern District. Venue therefore is proper in the Eastern District, and not in this 

one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 

Accordingly, in the interests of justice and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this action is 

TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The 

Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer the case forthwith. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2017

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00032-JST Document 3 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 1
McN

A

M

A

R

A, N

E

Y, B

E

A

T

T

Y, SL

A

T

T

E

R

Y, B

O

R

G

ES &

A

M

B

A

C

H

E

R

L

LP

ATT OR N EY S A T LA

W

3 4 8 0 B US K IRK

A

V E N

U E, SU ITE 2 5 0 , PLEA S A

N T H ILL, C A 9 4 5 2 3

TELEPH

O

N E: ( 9 2 5 ) 9 3 9 - 5 3 3 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

CITY OF PITTSBURG RELATED 

DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF APPEAL, C17-228 

JCS 

NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167)

noah.blechman@mcnamaralaw.com 

AMY S. ROTHMAN (State Bar No. 308133) 

amy.rothman@mcnamaralaw.com 

MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,

BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 

3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 250 

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 

Telephone: (925) 939-5330 

Facsimile: (925) 939-0203 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF PITTSBURG, and OFFICER MICHAEL KEEFE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WORSTEN ANDREWS,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF PITTSBURG, a municipal 

corporation; OFFICER MICHAEL KEEFE, 

individually and in his Official Capacity as 

a Police Officer for the CITY OF 

PITTSBURG; DOES 1-50, inclusive; 

individually and in their official capacities 

and POLICE OFFICERS for the CITY OF 

PITTSBURG, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C17-228 JCS

CITY OF PITTSBURG RELATED 

DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero 

Trial Date: October 7, 2019 

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants CITY OF PITTSBURG and SGT. MICHAEL 

KEEFE, hereby appeal the Court’s Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 

(ECF 68, filed 7-3-19), in regards to the Court’s denial of qualified immunity for Defendant Sgt. 

Keefe, per Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment excessive force claim. This appeal includes Plaintiff’s 

remaining state law claims including negligence against only the City of Pittsburg (on a 

Respondeat Superior theory) and battery against only Sgt. Keefe, both of which are based on 

Plaintiff’s claim that unreasonable force was used on him and both of which are inextricably 

Case 3:17-cv-00228-JCS Document 71 Filed 07/16/19 Page 1 of 2
McN

A

M

A

R

A, N

E

Y, B

E

A

T

T

Y, SL

A

T

T

E

R

Y, B

O

R

G

ES &

A

M

B

A

C

H

E

R

L

LP

ATT OR N EY S A T LA

W

3 4 8 0 B US K IRK

A

V E N

U E, SU ITE 2 5 0 , PLEA S A

N T H ILL, C A 9 4 5 2 3

TELEPH

O

N E: ( 9 2 5 ) 9 3 9 - 5 3 3 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

CITY OF PITTSBURG RELATED 

DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF APPEAL, C17-228 

JCS 

2

intertwined and directly related with the constitutional issues that remain, per the appellate court’s 

pendent appellate jurisdiction. Cunningham v. Gates, 229 F.3d 1271, 1285 (9th Cir. 2000). As 

such, all claims are at issue in this appeal. 

Dated: July 16, 2019 MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,

BORGES & AMBACHER LLP

By: /s/ Rothman, Amy 

Noah G. Blechman 

Amy S. Rothman 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF PITTSBURG, and OFFICER MICHAEL 

KEEFE 

Case 3:17-cv-00228-JCS Document 71 Filed 07/16/19 Page 2 of 2
NO. 07-08-0207-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

SEPTEMBER 22, 2008

______________________________

YOHAWNN DANTE BYNES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 31st DISTRICT COURT OF WHEELER COUNTY;

NO. 4062; HON. STEVEN RAY EMMERT, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Yohawnn Dante Bynes (appellant) appeals from his conviction for possession of a

controlled substance with intent to deliver. He filed his notice of appeal on May 15, 2008.

The clerk’s record was filed on June 23, 2008, and the reporter’s record July 15, 2008.

Appellant’s brief was due on August 14, 2008. No brief or extension was filed by that date

with the Court. On August 22, 2008, a letter was sent to appellant notifying him the brief
2

was overdue and that the brief or response was due on September 2, 2008. On

September 12, 2008, we received a motion to extend the time to file his brief.

Consequently, since appellant has no attorney and a determination must be made

on his indigency and whether he desires an attorney to represent him, we abate the appeal

and remand the cause to the 31st District Court (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon

remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and,

thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal

2. whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel.

We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to

pursue the appeal, is indigent and without counsel, we direct the trial court to appoint him

same unless appellant knowingly waives his right to counsel. In either situation, the name,

address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel, if any,

who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings of fact

and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1)

a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and 2)

a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s

record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before October 22, 2008. Should

additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or

before October 22, 2008.
3

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 09, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 09, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0200. EFFINGHAM COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. E. JEWEL TAYLOR. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV2018000137
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LION SHARE INVESTMENTS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

PABLO A. GARCIA,

Defendant.

Case No. 4:17-cv-00253-KAW 

JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR THE 

PURPOSES OF DETERMINING 

RELATIONSHIP

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled case is hereby REFERRED to the 

Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for consideration of whether the case is related to Lion Share 

Investments, LLC v. Garcia, 16-cv-05731-YGR.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2017

______________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:17-cv-00253-YGR Document 5 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:03-cv-02781-P Document 304 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2667
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02781-P Document 304 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 8 PageID 2668
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02781-P Document 304 Filed 07/15/05 Page 3 of 8 PageID 2669
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02781-P Document 304 Filed 07/15/05 Page 4 of 8 PageID 2670
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02781-P Document 304 Filed 07/15/05 Page 5 of 8 PageID 2671
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02781-P Document 304 Filed 07/15/05 Page 6 of 8 PageID 2672
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02781-P Document 304 Filed 07/15/05 Page 7 of 8 PageID 2673
 

 Case 3:03-cv-02781-P Document 304 Filed 07/15/05 Page 8 of 8 PageID 2674
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  in the Annual  Report  Form 10-K of Media Bay,
Inc.  for the year ended  December 31,  2003,  and by reference in  Registration
Statements No. 333-74413,  No.  333-83937,  No.  333-39918,  No. 333-45362,  No.
333-48752,  and No.  333-62860 on Form S-3 and in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-83935  and No.  333-41186 on Form S-8 of Media Bay, Inc. of our report dated
March 19,  2004,  except as to Note 21,  which is as of April  12,  2004  (which
expresses  an  unqualified  opinion  and  includes a going  concern  explanatory
paragraph.)


/s/ Amper Politziner & Mattia

Edison, New Jersey
April 14, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH POLICARPIO,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALCON LABORATORIES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00318-JD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

At 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, April 27, 2017, the Court called this case for an initial case 

management conference. Counsel for plaintiff did not appear. 

Counsel did not ask to change the hearing date or advise the Court that he would not be 

present. The failure to appear is unexcused and violates the Local Rules and the Court’s standing 

order for civil cases.

Plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to show cause in writing why sanctions should not be 

imposed. The written response is due by May 30, 2017. Further unexcused absences may result 

in dismissal of the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 22, 2017

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Cono Italiano, Inc.
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex J. Kaminski,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
June 11, 2010




By:
                  /s/ Alex J. KaminskiName:   
      Alex J. KaminskiTitle:     
      Principal Financial
Officer
exv4w14






Exhibit 4.14




Consent
of Independent Accountants




     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form F-8
of Fronteer Development Group Inc. (the “Registrant”) of our report dated March 27, 2008 relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of the Registrant as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Vancouver, British Columbia	  	(signed) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 	 
	January 23, 2009 	 	PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 	 
	 	 	Chartered Accountants
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-3163]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Commission on Roles and Missions of the Armed 
Forces

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Commission on Roles and Missions of the 
Armed Forces.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 25, 1995, 60 FR 4892, the Department of Defense 
published a notice concerning a meeting of the Commission on Roles and 
Missions of the Armed Forces. The open portion of this meeting, from 
12:45 p.m. until 2:15 p.m., was cancelled. All other information 
remains unchanged.
    Extraordinary circumstances compel this amendment to be posted in 
less than the 15-day requirement.

    Dated: February 3, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 94-3163 Filed 2-7-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-4-M
Carlos Lionel LEE v. STATE

CR-16-1277

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2565

PRENTISS MURRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GALEY & LORD, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-2115-4-21-JI)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Prentiss Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Allan Lash Shackelford, SMITH,

HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-2 (West 1994).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Murray v. Galey & Lord, Inc., No. CA-94-

2115-4-21-JI (D.S.C. July 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED