alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

 

Sarbanes - Oxley Section 302 Certification

 
| I, Thomas J. May, certify that: |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |
| 1.                    | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CEC Funding, LLC (the Registrant) and other reports containing distribution information for the period covered by the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
| 2.                    | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3.                    | Based on my knowledge, the financial information required to be provided to the trustee under the governing documents of the issuer is included in these reports; and |
| 4.                    | Based on my knowledge, Commonwealth Electric Company, the Servicer, has complied with its servicing obligations and minimum servicing standards. |
|  

                   |   |

 
|                                                                                                                                                        |                        |                                                                                                                                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 11, 2005                       |   By:   | /s/ THOMAS J. MAY                       |
|                                                                                                                                                        |                        | Thomas J. May                                                                                                                                         |
|                                                                                                                                                        |                        |                                                                                                                                                  |   | Chairman, President and |
|                                                                                                                                                        |                        |                                                                                                                                                  |   | Chief Executive Officer |
exv10w12






Exhibit 10.12




PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION

2008 FISCAL YEAR DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM




(Reflecting amendments thru December 16, 2008)





	A.	 	Amounts of 2008 Fiscal Year Compensation





	 	 	 
	• Annual Board Retainer:
	 	$275,000
	 
	 	 
	• Audit Committee:
	 	$25,000 for Chair

	 
	 	$20,000 for Members
	 
	 	 
	• Nomination and Governance Committee:
	 	$10,000 for Chair

	 
	 	$7,500 for Members
	 
	 	 
	• Compensation Committee:
	 	$15,000 for Chair

	 
	 	$12,500 for Members
	 
	 	 
	• Special Litigation Committee:
	 	$50,000 for Chair

	     (while in use)
	 	$45,000 for Members
	 
	 	 
	• Strategic Planning Committee1:
	 	$25,000 for Chair

	 
	 	$20,000 for Members
	 
	 	 
	• Board Chairman:
	 	$25,000






	 	 	 
	Form of Payment:

	 	25% in cash 

75% in equity (35% in fully vested deferred stock units and 

40% in fully vested options), except that the option portion of the last
payment to a director whose directorship terminates for any reason
at the end of, or during, a term shall be paid entirely in
deferred stock units.






	 	 	 
	Equity:

	 	The number of option shares is determined by dividing the compensation
amount by the grant date Black Scholes value. The number of deferred stock units is
determined by dividing the compensation amount by the grant date closing price of the
Corporation’s common stock.
	 
	 	 
	Timing:

	 	Annual fiscal year compensation will be paid in two installments,
coincident with the April and October dates of the broad-based employee equity grants.
The April payment is for service from December 1 through May 31, and the October
payment is for service from June 1 through November 30. Amounts paid will be
pro-rated for partial year service, with a fractional month of service rounded to a
whole month. Accordingly, if a director resigns from the Board, is








 




			
	1	 	Amended December 2008




 









 










	 	 	 
	 

	 	removed from the Board by a vote, is removed from the Board due to a change in
control, or dies in office, he or she is paid a pro-rated amount for service
through date of termination of service. Similarly a director who joins the
Board other than on the first day of the fiscal year will be paid a pro-rated
amount of the annual fiscal year compensation. The same proration rule will
also apply to any partial year service on any committee.







	B.	 	Initial Director Option Grant
	 
	 	 	Each newly elected Director shall receive an option to acquire 25,000 shares of the
Corporation’s common stock at the first April or October grant date following his or her
election to the Board. The vesting is over a 60-month period and begins on the first day
of the month following the month the Director joins the Board, with full acceleration upon
a change in control. The terms of the option shall be similar to terms of employee options.
	 
	C.	 	Stock Retention Guidelines
	 
	 	 	All non-employee Directors must hold 10,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock or
deferred stock units. Directors have three years to attain this guideline.






2
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of A & J Venture Capital Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Antal Markus

Antal Markus

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 27, 2010




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company  for purposes of




Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
JUDGMENT – No. 17-cv-00600-LB

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

San Francisco Division

RENEE MARIE LEPAGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF NAPA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00600-LB

JUDGMENT

On October 17, 2019, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. Pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the court hereby enters judgment in favor of defendants

County of Napa, County of Napa Sheriff’s Department, and Timothy Reid and against plaintiff

Renee Marie LePage. The court directs the Clerk of Court to close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2019

______________________________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00600-LB Document 160 Filed 10/17/19 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 15

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 23-27 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANGELO DIVISION

CRYSTAL MOLINA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 6:06-CV-015-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

August 28, 2006 (Doc. 10). Neither party has filed objections within the period specified in 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

WHEREFORE, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted by the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute or comply with the order to show cause.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Judgment in accordance with the terms of this order

shall be entered forthwith.

DATED this 21st day of September, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 6:06-cv-00015-C Document 17 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 38
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Malcolm LOWE and Sue Ellen Lowe, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2240

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ANDREW WILSON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 442 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
Peter Halilu OYIBO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-980

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0000708848
<NAME>                  FIRST CITIZENS
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         111,163
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         7,700
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               47,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    36,567
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         589,863
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           594,387
<LOANS>                                        1,437,676
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (26,306)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,320,736
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,890,944
<SHORT-TERM>                                   189,963
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            16,351
<LONG-TERM>                                    56,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,282
<COMMON>                                       4,646
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 2,320,736
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                30,913
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              8,216
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               873
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               40,002
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             14,709
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,529
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          22,473
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  281
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                19,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,743
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     9,743
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  6.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  6.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.84
<LOANS-NON>                                    2,641
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,628
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               75
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                20,163
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               26,135
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  709
<RECOVERIES>                                   599
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              26,306
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           26,306
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        9,220
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 23-21 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 1995)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 3302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-1012]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FOREIGN CLAIMS SETTLEMENT COMMISSION

F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 3-95

Announcement in Regard to Commission Meetings and Hearings

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504), and the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
open meetings and oral hearings for the transaction of Commission 
business and other matters specified, as follows:

Date, Time, and Subject Matter

Fri., Jan. 20, 1995 at 10:30 a.m.--Consideration of Proposed 
Decisions on claims against Iran.

    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe a meeting may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6029, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6988.

    Dated at Washington, DC on January 10, 1995.
Jeanette Matthews,
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 95-1012 Filed 1-11-95; 9:39 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
E.K., Mother of C.K., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-237

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 23, 2019

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, and Jeffrey Deen, Appellate Counsel, Office of the Criminal and Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.

Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children & Families, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Appellate Counsel, Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, and Kristen M. Fiore and Melanie Kalmanson, Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1
 
 Section
302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
 
 I, David
Taigen, certify that:
 
 1.   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Corporate Outfitters,
Inc.
 
 2.   Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances   under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;
 
 4.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I; are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
 that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
 consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
 those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
 annual
report is being prepared;
 
 b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
 controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
 the
filing date of this annual  report
(the  "Evaluation
 Date");
and
 
 c)   presented
in this annual report our conclusions about the
 effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
 our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 
 a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of
 internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
 ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data
 and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
 weaknesses
in internal controls; and
 
 b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
 or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
 internal
controls.
 
 6.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant efficiencies and material
weaknesses.
 
 
 Date:
June 28, 2008
 
 
 /s/
David Taigen
 David
Taigen
 Chief
Executive Officer and
 Chief
Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

DANIEL G. KIRAZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 30269

D.C. No. 3:15

- cr

- 00140

- JO

- 3

MEMORANDUM *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

GEORGE D. KIRAZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 30272

D.C. No. 3:15

- cr

- 00140

- JO

- 2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon

Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 5, 2017

Portland, Oregon

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

NOV 1 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

George and Daniel Kiraz were both involved in a family

- run strip

- club

business owned by David Kiraz (George’s son and Daniel’s brother). The

Government alleged that the Kiraz family engaged in a scheme to underreport the

clubs’ income by failing to report door fee s, which were charged for customer

entry, and house fee s, which were charged for working as a dancer

. G eorge and

Daniel were both convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2)

for participating in a conspiracy to defraud the United States and aiding and

assisting in the preparation of false and fraudulent tax returns for tax year 2010

.

Ge orge was additionally convicted of aiding and assisting in the preparation of

false and fraudulent tax returns for tax years 2008 and 2009. Pursuant to Fed. R.

Crim. P. 29, both George and Daniel moved for judgments of acquittal , which the

district court denied , and they have timely appealed

. This court has jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

T he jury heard evidence that George participated in a scheme to maintain

two separate sets of books

– an accurate, unreported set, and an inaccurate, reported

set

– with the goal of setting aside the house and door fees for his family, and that he

helped mislead the clubs’ tax preparers on several occasions

. The jury also heard

evidence that Daniel knowingly aided in the scheme to maintain two sets of boo ks

,

and that he answered the tax preparer’s questions for tax year 2010 on club

expenditures . Despite knowing that the financial documents in the tax preparer’s3

possession were missing house and door fees, a t no point during his conversation

with the tax preparer did Daniel raise the omission

. Therefore, t aken in the light

most favorable to the government, the eviden ce adduced at trial was sufficient to

enable a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt the essential

elements of each convic tion. United States v. Nevils , 598 F.3d 1158, 1163

- 64 (9 th

Cir. 2010) (en banc).

AFFIRMED

.