alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed April 10, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0207

Lower Tribunal No. 04-36-M

________________

Eric Boyington,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. 

Koenig, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See § 394.918(3), Fla. Stat. (2023) (“The court shall hold a 

limited hearing to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that 

the person’s condition has so changed that it is safe for the person to be at 

large and that the person will not engage in acts of sexual violence if 

discharged.”); Abaunza v. State, 278 So. 3d 207, 210 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) 

(holding that the appellate court reviews whether a trial court’s section 

394.918(3) probable cause determination is supported by competent, 

substantial evidence); Barron v. State, 217 So. 3d 1088, 1091 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2017) (holding that, pursuant to section 394.918(3), the trial court may weigh 

and consider competing evaluations of a petitioner who is seeking release 

from involuntary civil commitment).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Hackett, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |     |                                      
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2009 | By: | /s/ DAVIDF. HACKETT                  
|                     |     | David F. Hackett                     
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                     |     | Gulfstream International Group, Inc.
**Exhibit
      23.2**


**[American
      Appraisal China Limited Letterhead]**




June
      18,
      2008





Mr.
      Liang
      Xu


Chief
      Financial Officer





China
      Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd.


Jingmeng
      High-Tech Building B, 4/F


No.
      5
      Shangdi East Road,


Haidian
      District, Beijing 100085


People’s
      Republic of China








**Subject:
      WRITTEN CONSENT OF AMERICAN APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED**





Dear
      Mr.
      Xu:





We
      hereby
      consent to the references to our name and our final appraisal report, dated
      January 2, 2007, and addressed to the board of directors of China Digital TV
      Technology Co., Ltd., and to the references to our valuation methodologies,
      assumptions and conclusions associated with such report, in the annual reports
      on Form 20-F of China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd. and any amendments thereto
      (the “Reports”) filed or to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
      Commission. We further consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to
      the
      Reports.





In
      giving
      such consent, we do not hereby admit that we come within the category of persons
      whose consent is required under Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933,
      as
      amended, or the rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and
      Exchange Commission thereunder (the “Act”); nor do we admit that we are experts
      with respect to any part of the Reports within the meaning of the term “experts”
as used in the Act.





Yours
      faithfully,





/s/
                American Appraisal China LimitedAMERICAN
                APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 508 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 508

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 
           Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2022

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 
           Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018.

Whereas, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting that claimed the lives of 17 
        teachers and students took place at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School 
        in Parkland, Florida;
Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for the individuals who 
        were affected by this tragedy;
Whereas the Parkland community has shown strength, compassion, and unity in the 
        past 4 years; and
Whereas February 14, 2022, marks 4 years since the horrific attack: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the memories of the victims of the senseless 
        attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 
        2018, and offers heartfelt condolences and deepest sympathies 
        to the families, loved ones, and friends of the victims;
            (2) honors the survivors of the attack and pledges 
        continued support for their recovery;
            (3) recognizes the strength and resilience of the Marjory 
        Stoneman Douglas High School community; and
            (4) expresses gratitude to the emergency medical and health 
        care professionals of the Parkland community for their efforts 
        in responding to the attack and caring for the victims and 
        survivors.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE David BLACKERBY

CR-16-1250

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ANDY DANTZLER, 812677, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-2164-D

)

WILLIAM STEPHENS, )

Director TDCJ-CID, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and

the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that

the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions,

and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted.

Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the

Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the court denies a

certificate of appealability. The court adopts and incorporates by reference the magistrate judge’s

findings, conclusions, and recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that the

petitioner has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this court’s “assessment of the

constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable

whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable

whether [this court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.473, 484

(2000).

Case 3:05-cv-02164-D-BF Document 26 Filed 02/03/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 703
If petitioner files a notice of appeal,

( ) petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

(X) petitioner must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in

forma pauperis.

SO ORDERED.

February 3, 2014.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

CHIEF JUDGE

2

Case 3:05-cv-02164-D-BF Document 26 Filed 02/03/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 704
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 694 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 694

   Expressing support for the designation of July 2022 as ``National 
                       Sarcoma Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2022

   Mr. Johnson (for himself and Mr. Rounds) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

                             July 20, 2022

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to with an amended preamble

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing support for the designation of July 2022 as ``National 
                       Sarcoma Awareness Month''.

Whereas sarcoma is a rare cancer of the bones or connective tissues, such as 
        nerves, muscles, joints, fat, and blood vessels, that can arise nearly 
        anywhere in the body;
Whereas, in the United States--

    (1) about 16,000 individuals are diagnosed with sarcoma each year;

    (2) approximately 7,200 individuals die from sarcoma each year; and

    (3) about 50,000 individuals struggle with sarcoma at any given time;

Whereas, each year, about 1 percent of cancers diagnosed in adults and around 15 
        percent of cancers diagnosed in children are sarcoma;
Whereas more than 70 subtypes of sarcoma have been identified;
Whereas the potential causes of sarcoma are not well understood;
Whereas treatment for sarcoma can include surgery, radiation therapy, or 
        chemotherapy;
Whereas sarcoma is often misdiagnosed and underreported; and
Whereas July 2022 would be an appropriate month to designate as National Sarcoma 
        Awareness Month--

    (1) to raise awareness about sarcoma; and

    (2) to encourage more individuals in the United States to get properly 
diagnosed and treated: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation of July 2022 as 
``National Sarcoma Awareness Month''.
                                 <all>
```
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 673 

Authorizing the Committee on Rules and Administration to prepare a revised 

edition of the Standing Rules of the Senate as a Senate document. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2022 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the Committee on Rules and Administration to 

prepare a revised edition of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate as a Senate document. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. PRINTING THE STANDING RULES OF THE SEN3 ATE. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATIONS.—The Committee on Rules and 

5 Administration shall prepare a revised edition of the 

6 Standing Rules of the Senate and such standing rules 

7 shall be printed as a Senate document. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 673 ATS 

1 (b) ADDITIONAL COPIES.—In addition to the usual 

2 number, 1,750 additional copies shall be printed for use 

3 by the Committee on Rules and Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Gregory LaKeith HUFFMAN v. STATE

CR-16-1068

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CENTOCOR,
INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET. CENTOCOR, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          59,135
<SECURITIES>                                   111,137
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               223,138
<PP&E>                                         141,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,535
<BONDS>                                         54,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           691
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,396
<SALES>                                         89,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,647
<CGS>                                           42,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,361)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    705
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,656)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lukas Braunschweiler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Dionex Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarter Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.

| |  |        |  |                                                
| |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
| |  | By:    |  | /s/   Lukas Braunschweiler                     
| |  |        |  |                                                
| |  |        |  |                                                
| |  | Name:  |  | Lukas Braunschweiler                           
| |  |        |  |                                                
| |  | Title: |  | President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director

I, Craig A. McCollam, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Dionex Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarter Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Dionex Corporation.

| |  |        |  |                                           
| |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------
| |  | By:    |  | /s/   Craig A. McCollam                   
| |  |        |  |                                           
| |  |        |  |                                           
| |  | Name:  |  | Craig A. McCollam                         
| |  |        |  |                                           
| |  | Title: |  | Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 25, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10097]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-195-002]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Compliance Filing

April 19, 1995.
    Take notice that on April 13, 1995, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing in compliance with the 
Commission's March 29, 1995, letter order in this proceeding. On March 
1 and March 13, 1995, Columbia Gulf submitted tariff sheets reflecting 
an annual Transportation Retainage Adjustment (TRA). The March 29, 1995 
letter order accepted and suspended those filings to be effective April 
1, 1995, subject to Columbia Gulf providing additional explanation and 
data.
    Columbia Gulf states that in this compliance filing it is providing 
additional workpapers, supporting data and explanations as required by 
the March 29, 1995 letter order.
    Columbia Gulf states that copies of this filing have been mailed to 
all firm customers and affected state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed on or before April 26, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. 
Copies of Columbia Gulf's filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10097 Filed 4-24-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer forBrookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) pursuant to aMaster Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield AssetManagement Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., BrookfieldInfrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc., Brookfield Asset Management BarbadosInc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to hisknowledge on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership onForm 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “AnnualReport”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the informationcontained in such Annual Report, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A,fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Partnership.

 

 

Date:November 23, 2010

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/  Samuel Pollock                               |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Samuel  Pollock                                   |
|   | Title: | CEO,  Brookfield Infrastructure Group Corporation |

 

1

----
Christopher CLAUSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-425

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Stephen Weinbaum, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* *Cohen v. State*, 171 So.3d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (holding that reversal of probation violation order was not required, despite error in revoking probation on an uncharged violation, where the record separately supported trial court's revocation on a properly-charged violation *1125and it is clear that trial court would have revoked probation and imposed the same sentence absent the uncharged conduct); *Ware v. State*, 54 So.3d 1074 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). *See also* *Francois v. State*, 923 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Exhibit 10.10


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO
  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 










 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment
Agreement”) dated January     , 2009, is between
Tuesday Morning Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and
Michael Marchetti (“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an
employment agreement dated October 2, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to amend the
Employment Agreement; now therefore:


 


In consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.             Paragraph 3(d) of the Employment Agreement is
hereby amended to read as follows in its entirety:


 


“(d) In connection with his employment under this Agreement,
Executive shall be granted by the Company under the 2008 Plan a restricted
stock award of 145,631 shares of Common Stock as promptly as practicable.  The restricted stock award shall be subject
to substantial risk of forfeiture restrictions one-third of which shall lapse
on each of November 14, 2009, November 14, 2010, and November 14,
2011.  In addition, during the Employment
Period, the Company shall pay Executive an amount equal to $200,000 per year on
each of November 14, 2009, November 14, 2010 and November 14,
2011.”


 


2.             Capitalized terms used in this Amendment Agreement and
not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Employment Agreement.


 


3.             This Amendment Agreement may be executed in separate
counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original and all of which taken
together constitute one and the same agreement.


 


4.             Any references to the Employment Agreement in any other
document shall be deemed to mean the Employment Agreement, as amended by this
Amendment Agreement.


 


5.             The Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment
Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect.


 


1

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly
executed this Amendment Agreement on the date first written above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Stephanie Bowman

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Stephanie Bowman

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Executive Vice President and Chief

  Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Michael Marchetti

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Michael Marchetti

  
				



 


2