alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RICARDO MORGUTIA, Jr.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50605

D.C. No. 3:08-cr-03094-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Ricardo Morgutia, Jr., appeals from the twelve-month sentence imposed

upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291, and we affirm.

Morgutia contends that the district court committed plain procedural error by

FILED

JUL 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50605

relying on a sentencing factor not permissibly considered upon revocation of

supervised release, failing to calculate his Guidelines range, and failing to consider

the applicable factors set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The record indicates that

the district court did not rely on impermissible sentencing factors. See United

States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006) (“[A]t a revocation

sentencing, a court may appropriately sanction a violator for his ‘breach of

trust[.]’”). 

In addition, Morgutia has not shown that the district court’s failure to

expressly calculate the Guidelines range affected Morgutia’s substantial rights. 

Defense counsel accurately told the court that the Guidelines range was four to ten

months, the government did not dispute it, and the court said that it was departing

upward from this range, all of which demonstrate that the court consciously

considered the proper Guidelines during the sentencing process. Cf. United States

v. Hammons, 558 F.3d 1100, 1105-06 (9th Cir. 2009) (substantial rights affected

where court did not calculate Guidelines range and probation report included

incorrect criminal history category); United States v. Waknine, 543 F.3d 546, 554

(9th Cir. 2008) (failure to calculate Guidelines range was reversible plain error in

combination with other procedural errors). Moreover, under the circumstances, the

court sufficiently explained its reasons for the sentence it imposed. See United
3 09-50605

States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc); cf. Hammons, 558

F.3d at 1104 (reversing where court provided no explanation for sentence);

Waknine, 543 F.3d at 554 (same).

AFFIRMED.
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                FDA Drug Info Rounds Video

FDA Drug Info Rounds Video Home
          Drugs
          Resources | Drugs
          Information for Health Care Professionals | Drugs
          FDA Drug Info Rounds Video
          Managing Drug ShortagesFDA Drug Info Rounds Video Managing Drug Shortages
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintThe Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) was passed by Congress in 2012, and provides new authorities for FDA to manage drug shortages.  FDA Drug Info Rounds pharmacists discuss the management of drug shortages and how the FDA’s role has changed in recent years.

Return to FDA Drug Info Rounds Page

Related Information

Transcript: Managing Drug Shortages
	Drug Shortages Database Search

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      12/05/2014FDA Drug Info Rounds Video
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 
| The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of BEC Funding II, LLC, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   (i)                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | the enclosed Quarterly Report of BEC Funding II, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  |
|   (ii)                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of BEC Funding II, LLC.

  |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |

 
|                                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: May  11, 2005      |   | By:   | /s/ THOMAS J. MAY       |
|                                                    |   |   | Thomas J. May |
|                                                    |   |   | Chairman, President and |
|                                                    |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10173]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Petition No. P2-95]


Household Goods Forwarders Association of America, Inc.; Petition 
for Exemption From Tariff and Bonding Requirements in Regard to 
Household Goods and Personal Effects for the Account of the General 
Services Administration; Notice of Filing

    Notice is hereby given that the Household Goods Forwarders 
Association of America, Inc. (``Petitioner'') has petitioned for an 
exemption pursuant to Section 16 of the Shipping Act of 1984 [46 U.S.C. 
app. 1715] and Section 35 of the Shipping Act, 1916 [46 U.S.C. app. 
833a]. Petitioner seeks an exemption for non-vessel operating common 
carriers by water from the tariff filing requirements of Part 514 and 
the bonding requirement of Part 583 of Title 46 CFR, to the extent they 
engage in the transportation of used household goods and personal 
effects of personnel of federal civilian executive agencies in the 
domestic and foreign commerce of the United States, pursuant to a 
solicitation issued and administered by the General Services 
Administration of the United States.
    In order for the Commission to make a thorough evaluation of the 
petition for exemption, and the proposed CFR amendments suggested 
therein, interested persons are requested to submit views or arguments 
in reply to the petition no later than May 25, 1995. Replies shall be 
directed to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 
20573-0001 in an original and 15 copies.
    Replies shall also be served on Alan F. Wohlstetter, Denning & 
Wohlstetter, 1700 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    Copies of the petition are available for examination at the 
Washington, DC office of the Commission, 800 N. Capitol St NW., Room 
1046.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10173 Filed 4-25-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
Roy COURAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3969

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Arthur L. Regan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2005 of Arlington Tankers, Ltd.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Not applicable];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       /s/ Arthur L. Regan         Name: Arthur L. Regan  Date: November 14, 2005 Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer & President
III 

Calendar No. 376 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 390 

Expressing appreciation for the State of Qatar’s efforts to assist the United 

States during Operation Allies Refuge. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. COONS, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. MARSHALL) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Relations 

MAY 24, 2022 

Reported by Mr. MENENDEZ, without amendment 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing appreciation for the State of Qatar’s efforts to 

assist the United States during Operation Allies Refuge. 

Whereas thousands of United States citizens, lawful permanent residents, vulnerable Afghans, and their families 

sought refuge following the Afghan Taliban’s takeover of 

the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan; 

Whereas the State of Qatar played a critical role in assisting 

the United States in evacuating thousands of people from 

the rule of the Afghan Taliban regime; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 390 RS 

Whereas Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar served as a central 

transportation hub for many evacuees desperately seeking 

to exit Afghanistan; and 

Whereas Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin stated, 

‘‘Qatar’s support for Operation Allies Refuge was indispensable to the safe transit of Americans and U.S. personnel, allies, partners and Afghans at special risk.’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) thanks the State of Qatar for their pivotal 

3 role and support of Operation Allies Refuge; and 

4 (2) appreciates the State of Qatar’s support to 

5 temporarily house thousands of evacuees until they 

6 are cleared for follow-on movement. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 376 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 390 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing appreciation for the State of Qatar’s efation Allies Refuge. forts to assist the United States during OperMAY 24, 2022 

Reported without amendment 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Asia Network, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Li Sze Tang, President, CFO and a director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Li Sze Tang



Li Sze Tang, President, CFO and

 a director

June 15, 2005
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 6th Floor

San Jose, CA 95110

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHEILA MCCRORY, 

Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Defendants. 

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00293-EJD

 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH 

DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, 

N.A.

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT plaintiff Sheila McCrory and defendant JPMorgan 

Chase Bank, N.A. by and through their respective counsel of record, have reached a settlement 

in principle of the above captioned case and are in the process of documenting said settlement. 

The parties believe the settlement will be finalized within 30 days and will request dismissal of 

this action. 

Sagaria Law, P.C.

Dated: May 12, 2017 By: /s/ Scott Johnson

Scott Johnson

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 5:17-cv-00293-EJD Document 21 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP

Dated: May 12, 2017 By: /s/ Julieta Stepanyan

Julieta Stepanyan

 Attorneys for Defendant

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file 

this Notice. I hereby attest that Julieta Stepanyan has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

Case 5:17-cv-00293-EJD Document 21 Filed 05/12/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         484,479
<SECURITIES>                                   487,581
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,421,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    491,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,324,645
<PP&E>                                       1,591,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                 865,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,222,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,631,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,483,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,222,794
<SALES>                                      6,055,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,055,225
<CGS>                                        3,058,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,366,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                772,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                   247,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            525,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   525,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35
        

</TABLE>
MMI Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and Chief Executive Officer

MMI is committed to the highest standards of ethics and business conduct. This encompasses our relationship with our customers, our suppliers, our shareowners, our competitors, the communities in which we operate, and with each other. All Senior Financial Officers and the Chief Executive Officer will adhere to the following:

1. Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
2. Avoidance of conflicts of interest, including disclosure to appropriate Senior Financial Officers or the Chief Executive Officer of any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such a conflict;
3. Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a company files with, or submits to, the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in other public communications made by the company;
4. Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
5. The prompt internal reporting to appropriate Senior Financial Officers or the Chief Executive Officer identified in the code of violations of the code; and
6. Accountability for adherence to the code.
Allen Dwayne TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3446

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 3.8


STATE OF DELAWARE


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


OF BY LAWS





The corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware does hereby certify:




FIRST: That at a resolution of the Board of Directors of Liberty Capital Asset Management, Inc. were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the By Laws of said corporation, the proposed amendment is as follows;




RESOLVED, that the By Laws of this corporation be amended by changing the Article I thereof numbered (1) Annual Meeting, so that as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:




A meeting of the shareholders shall be held annually for the election of Directors and to transact business as may be determined by the Board of Directors.




RESOLVED that the By Laws of this corporation be amended by changing the ArticleIIIthereof numbered (5) President, so that as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:




The President may be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation or someone other than the Chief Executive Officer shall have general and active management of the business of the Corporation and shall seethat all orders and resolutions of the Board of Directors are carried into effect. The President shall also preside at all meeting of the shareholders and the Board of Directors.




RESOLVED,that the By Laws of this corporation be amended by changing the ArticleVthereof numbered (2) Fiscal Year,so that as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:




The fiscal year of the Corporation shall be the twelve months ending March 31st.or such other period as may be fixed by the Board of Directors.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF we do set our hands this 3rd day of November, 2008.











/s/  Michael A. BarronMichael A. Barron, Director and CEO/s/  Joseph Cosio BarronJoseph Cosio Barron, Secretary and Director