alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 8628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-3736]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration


Sensors Technical Advisory Committee; Partially Closed Meeting

    A meeting of the Sensors Technical Advisory Committee will be held 
March 8, 1995, 9 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 
1617M(2), 14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. The 
Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the 
level of export controls applicable to sensors and related equipment 
and technology.

Agenda

General Session

1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.
2. Presentation on Automated Export System (AES).
3. Presentation on Office of Strategic Industries and Economic 
Security.
4. Presentation of papers or comments by the public.
5. Old business.
6. New business--Working Group and Task assignments.

Executive Session

7. Discussion of matters properly classified under Executive Order 
12356, dealing with the U.S. and COCOM control program and strategic 
criteria related thereto.

    The General Session of the meeting will be open to the public and a 
limited number of seats will be available. To the extent that time 
permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials two weeks 
prior to the meeting date to the following address: Ms. Lee Ann 
Carpenter, OAS/EA--Room 3886C, Bureau of Export Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. 20230.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the General Counsel, formally determined on January 6, 1994, pursuant 
to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 
that the series of meetings of the Committee and of any Subcommittees 
thereof, dealing with the classified materials listed in 5 U.S.C., 
552b(c)(1) shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public 
meetings found in section 10(a)(1) and (a)(3), of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act. The remaining series of meetings or portions thereof 
will be open to the public.
    A copy of the Notice of Determination to close meetings or portions 
of meetings of the Committee is available for public inspection and 
copying in the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, Room 
6020, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. For further 
information or copies of the minutes, contact Lee Ann Carpenter on 
(202) 482-2583.

    Dated: February 9, 1995.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.
[FR Doc. 94-3736 Filed 2-14-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
Exhibit 12.1


                          COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Years Ended December 31, 

                                                                          1996
                                                                  Pro
                                                    1997         Forma(1)        Actual          1995
<S>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings (loss) before fixed charges (2):

     Loss before extraordinary items              ($112.1)       ($118.3)        ($22.6)        ($48.9)

     Income tax benefit                             (43.6)         (50.2)          (4.5)         (24.9)

     Fixed charges                                  265.2          260.5          260.5          273.8
                                                   ------         ------         ------         ------

                                                   $109.5          $92.0         $233.4         $200.0
                                                   ======         ======         ======         ======

Fixed charges (2):

     Interest expense                              $227.9         $228.4         $228.4         $245.6

     Interest expense on notes payable
          to affiliates                              37.3           32.1           32.1           28.2
                                                   ------         ------         ------         ------

                                                   $265.2         $260.5         $260.5         $273.8
                                                   ======         ======         ======         ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (3)               --             --             --             --

<FN>
_______________________

(1)  Pro forma ratio of earnings to fixed charges information is presented as if
     the Scripps Acquisition (as defined herein) occurred on January 1, 1996.

(2)  For the purpose of  calculating  the ratio of  earnings  to fixed  charges,
     earnings consist of loss before  extraordinary  items,  income tax benefit,
     and fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of interest  expense and interest
     expense on notes payable to affiliates.

(2)  For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, earnings,  as defined
     above,  were  inadequate  to cover fixed charges by $155.7  million,  $27.1
     million and $73.8 million, respectively. On a pro forma basis, for the year
     ended December 31, 1996,  earnings,  as defined above,  were  inadequate to
     cover fixed charges by $168.5 million.
</FN>
</TABLE>
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Gold Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date:  January 31, 2007


/s/ Tim Coupland
----------------------------------
Tim Coupland, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 11


                            U.S.B. HOLDING CO., INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
                ------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          THREE MONTHS        SIX MONTHS
                                                              ENDED              ENDED
                                                          JUNE 30, 2002      JUNE 30, 2002
                                                          -------------      -------------
                                                             (000'S, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<S>                                                        <C>                <C>
NUMERATOR:
        Net income                                         $     6,106        $    12,115
        Less preferred stock dividends                              10                 10
                                                           -----------        -----------

        Net income for basic and diluted earnings
          per common share - net income available
          to common stockholders                           $     6,096        $    12,105
                                                           ===========        ===========

DENOMINATOR:
        Denominator for basic earnings per common
           share - weighted average shares                  18,403,822         18,377,990

        Effects of dilutive securities:
         Director and employee stock options                   579,211            558,778
                                                           -----------        -----------

        Total effects of dilutive securities                   579,211            558,778
                                                           -----------        -----------

        Denominator for diluted earnings per common
           share - adjusted weighted average shares         18,983,033         18,936,768
                                                           ===========        ===========

        Basic earnings per common share                    $      0.33        $      0.66
                                                           ===========        ===========
        Diluted earnings per common share                  $      0.32        $      0.64
                                                           ===========        ===========
</TABLE>
Alberto R. ALGABA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3780

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 7, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO QUASH 

TRIAL SUBPOENA

Re: Dkt. No. 1041

On December 21, 2018, third parties Bain & Company, Inc. and Christopher Johnson 

(collectively “Bain”) filed a motion to quash Qualcomm’s trial subpoena to Christopher Johnson. 

ECF No. 1041. The Court ORDERS Qualcomm to file its opposition by December 28, 2018. The 

Court ORDERS Bain to file its reply by January 2, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 26, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1045 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 1
Waylon James CRAIGHEAD v. STATE

CR-16-0317

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Michael Eugene WADE v. STATE

CR-17-0035

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# L_2018108EN.01002801.xml

| 27.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/28

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2018/654

of 26 April 2018

amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 on the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 16 October 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 (1) on the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 16 October 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 (1) on the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq).

| (2) | To cover the Mission's need for security services until the end of its current mandate, the financial reference amount should be revised, and Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 should be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To cover the Mission's need for security services until the end of its current mandate, the financial reference amount should be revised, and Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 should be amended accordingly.

| (3) | EUAM Iraq is being conducted in a context which may deteriorate and which could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

EUAM Iraq is being conducted in a context which may deteriorate and which could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Amendment of Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869

In Article 14 of Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUAM Iraq from 16 October 2017 to 17 October 2018 shall be EUR 17 300 000. The financial reference amount for any subsequent period shall be decided by the Council.’.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 26 April 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. ZAHARIEVA

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 of 16 October 2017 on the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq) (OJ L 266, 17.10.2017, p. 12).

1

---
Peter Allen ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-201

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 14, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 31, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 1, 2019

Peter Allen Anderson, Indiantown, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Due to Appellant's apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment(s) and sentence(s) in Seminole County Circuit Court Case Number 14-CF-0877-A, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. *See* *State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.

Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. *See* *Isley v. State* , 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough."). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. *See* § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; *Simpkins v. State* , 909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

*1196FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.

COHEN, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         155,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          31,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,151,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    569,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         569,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           569,000
<LOANS>                                      6,251,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                     52,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,420,000
<DEPOSITS>                                   8,396,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            213,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,808,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              11,420,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 47,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               63,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               110,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              32,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           78,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                117,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (41,000)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (41,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.54
<LOANS-NON>                                     41,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    51,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                50,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               52,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            52,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1 - Director Compensation

     The Board of the Bank authorized a decrease in directors' fees for Board
member services to $0 from $1,500 per month effective February 1, 2009.

     The Boards of the Company and the Bank, as applicable, also authorized a
decrease to $0 from $375 per month for members of each committee of the
following committees effective February 1, 2009: audit (Company committee) and
loan (Bank committee).
Case No. 17-cv-00220 LHK (NC) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

QUALCOMM INC.,

Defendant.

IN RE QUALCOMM ANTITRUST LIT.

Case No. 17-cv-00220 LHK (NC)

Case No. 17-md-02773 LHK (NC) 

ORDER FOLLOWING MARCH 30 

DISCOVERY STATUS REPORT

Re: Dkt. No. 663 in -220

Upon review of the March 30 discovery status report between Apple and 

Qualcomm, I order as follows:

1. Thank you to the parties and their counsel for resolving several of the smaller 

issues presented during our March 28 conference.

2. The parties must comply with their self-proposed deadlines in the report, such as 

Apple’s promise at 2:12-14 to produce a small number of incorrectly logged 

documents within the next week, and to produce Bruce Sewell for deposition on 

April 4-5.

3. In a separate order today I have addressed the privilege re-review protocol.

4. On December 21, 2017, I imposed a daily monetary sanction against Apple until 

it substantially completed its document production. Dkt. No. 250. Upon appeal

of that order, the trial judge reversed the order imposing a sanction, but 

remanded for further consideration of the propriety and amount of any sanction 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 665 Filed 03/30/18 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 17-cv-00220 LHK (NC) 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

against Apple. Dkt. No. 325. Now, in consideration of Apple’s satisfactory and 

timely completion of its 37-million page document production (while noting the 

discovery process is continuing with certain depositions and a privilege rereview protocol), I vacate the December 21 sanction order.

5. Apple and Qualcomm are ordered to file a further joint discovery status report 

on April 16. The requirement for weekly reports is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2018 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 665 Filed 03/30/18 Page 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7590** 

CHARLES A. BIRDSONG , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE, Dir. of D.O.C. , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv - 00786

- JRS )

Submitted : March 12, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015

Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circui t Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Charles A. Birdsong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles A. Birdsong seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition challenging his Virginia state convictions for aggravated malicious wounding and use of a firearm . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or j udge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court d enies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Mi ller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the de nial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Birdsong has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma paup eris, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED