alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEWIS DOMINIC SHAW,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. THOMAS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00462-YGR (PR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CHANGE 

TIME TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE 

MOTION

Defendants N. Adam, D. Alpaugh, B. Fellows, D. George, N. Ikegbu, D. Jacobsen, 

M. McLean, S. Risenhoover, M. Sayre, L. Thomas, and D. Venes (Defendants) filed a motion to 

change the Court’s deadline to file a dispositive motion, from November 14, 2017 to January 15, 

2018. The Court has read and considered Defendants’ motion and the accompanying declaration 

of counsel, and finds that good cause exists to grant the motion.

Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to change time to file a dispositive motion is GRANTED. 

The time for Defendants to file their motion is changed to January 15, 2018. Plaintiff’s 

opposition to Defendants’ motion must be served and filed no more than twenty-eight (28) days

after the Defendants’ motion is served and filed. Defendants’ reply, if any must be served and 

filed no more than fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff’s opposition is entered in the Court’s docket. 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply is filed. 

The Court notes that this is the first extension in this case. The granting of regular requests 

for extension should not be expected.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________________________ __________________________

THE HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

November 17, 2017
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1481 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 1
Opinion filed April 2 , 2015



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ __ _____ 

### No. 11

- 1 5

- 00 0 3 9

- CR

_____ __ _____ 

### EDDIE DALE UNDERWOOD , Appellant
V.
THE S TATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 259 th District Court
Jones County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 6880

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Eddie Dale Underwood , pro se, attempts to appeal from the trial court’s denial of a motion requesting an out

- of

- time appeal of a 1992 nunc pro tunc order

. The trial court denied Appellant’s motion on February 5, 2015 , and Appellant filed a notice of appeal. Upon docketing the appeal , w e notified Appellant by letter
dated March 5, 2015, that it did not appear that this court had jurisdiction in th is

matte r and that it did not appear that the trial court’s February 2015 order was a2 final, appealable order. W e requested that Appellant file a response showing grounds to continue the appeal. Appellant filed a response but has not shown grounds upon which t his appeal may be continued

. Appellant asserts that this court has jurisdiction because his notice of appeal complies with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25. We disagree. Mere compliance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure does not bestow jurisdiction on
this court. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). We hold
that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appea l from th e trial court’s order
den ying Appellant’s motion for an out

- of

- time appeal because th at order is not a final, appealable order. See Underwood v. State
, No. 11

- 08

- 00128

- CR, 2008 WL 2058548 (Tex. App.

— Eastland May 15, 2008, pet. dism’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing a previous appeal in which Appellant attempted to at tack the 1992 judgment nunc pro tunc by way of a 2008 motion to vacate)

. Furthermore, a n intermediate appellate court has no jurisdiction to grant

an out

- of

- time appeal or to consider a motion for an out

- of

- time appeal ; the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the only court with jurisdiction in final post

conviction felony proceedings

. Olivo , 918 S.W.2 d at 522

– 24, 52 5 n.8 ; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). This appeal is dismiss ed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

April 2 , 2015 Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J. , and Bailey, J.
---

Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDC 2004-D Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Richard W. McCullough

May 14, 2010Richard W. McCulloughChief Executive OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

May 14, 2010Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 11, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02444]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-211-2024]

Approval of Subzone Expansion; Swagelok Company; Solon, Ohio

    On December 2, 2024, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Cleveland 
Cuyahoga County Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 40, requesting expansion 
of Subzone 40I subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 40, on 
behalf of Swagelok Company, in Solon, Ohio.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (89 FR 96637, December 5, 2024). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for 
approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board 
Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand 
Subzone 40I to include a new site located at 28000 F.A. Lennon Drive, 
in Solon (Site 14) was approved on February 5, 2025, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including section 400.13, and further 
subject to FTZ 40's 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Dated: February 5, 2025.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-02444 Filed 2-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PLAINTIFF NGOC LAM CHE’S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION 

CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-00381

ASCENSION LAW GROUP

PAMELA TSAO (SBN: 266734)

17802 Irvine Blvd

Suite 117

Tustin, CA92780

PH: 714.783.4220

FAX: 888.505.1033

Pamela.Tsao@ascensionlawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff NGOC LAM CHE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NGOC LAM CHE, an individual

Plaintiff,

vs.

SAN JOSE/EVERGREEN COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION, a 

California Corporation; IMWALLE 

PROPERTIES, INC, a California Corporation, 

Defendants.

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00381

PLAINTIFF NGOC LAM CHE’S MOTION 

TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION 

Case 5:17-cv-00381-BLF Document 44 Filed 08/11/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PLAINTIFF NGOC LAM CHE’S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION 

CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-00381

In accordance with Northern District of California Civil L. R. 7-11, Plaintiff Ngo Clam Che 

(“Plaintiff”) respectfully moves the Court for leave to exceed the page limit under Civil L. R. 7-

11(b) for Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Administrative Relief Extending 

Mediation Deadline or Compelling Compliance with General Order 56-4.

Plaintiff’s Opposition is 7 pages in length. The local rules of Northern District of California 

state that an Opposition to a Motion for Administrative Relief shall not exceed five pages. Because 

Plaintiff’s Opposition is longer than the five pages allowed by the local rules, Plaintiff requests leave 

of Court to exceed the page limitation. 

Good cause exists for extending the page limitation. Despite there being a stay in this case, 

Defendants have filed a number of motions. There has also been significant litigation in this action. 

Plaintiff requires an additional two pages in order to adequately brief the Court about the procedural 

history of this action. 

ASCENSION LAW GROUP, PC

DATE: August 11, 2017

_____/s/ Pamela Tsao__

Pamela Tsao, attorney for Plaintiff

Ngoc Lam Che

. 

Case 5:17-cv-00381-BLF Document 44 Filed 08/11/17 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES L. STEVENSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRATT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00336-SI 

ORDER

Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 18, 22, 23

A. Defendants’ Request To Seal Documents

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment in this pro se prisoner’s civil rights 

action alleging claims concerning plaintiff’s medical care. In support of their motion, defendants 

submitted copies of plaintiff’s medical records and requested that those medical records be sealed. 

Upon due consideration, defendants’ request to file the medical records under seal is GRANTED. 

Docket No. 22. Defendants have demonstrated that the confidential information in the documents, 

if disclosed to the general public, may intrude on plaintiff’s medical privacy interests. 

Accordingly, the documents identified as Exhibits A-D (Docket No. 22-2) will be filed under seal 

and not available for inspection by the public absent a court order permitting such inspection. See

N.D. Cal. L. R. 79-5.

If defendants have not yet done so, they must send a copy of Exhibits A-D to plaintiff no 

later than May 1, 2018. 

B. Plaintiff’s Miscellaneous Filings

Plaintiff has filed several documents marked as “declaration of plaintiff & additional 

complaints.” Docket Nos. 17, 18, 23. It is not clear what plaintiff intends to accomplish with 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

these documents as some mention facts in this case, and some complain about other wrongs he 

suffered at the jail at the hands of different people at different times than alleged in this action. 

Some of the discussions in the documents do not make sense to the court. Some of the discussions 

appear to concern events that occurred before plaintiff saw defendant nurse practitioner John Poh -

- and events that apparently occurred at a different branch of the San Francisco County Jail. 

This action concerns only plaintiff’s allegations against defendants John Poh and Dr. Pratt 

concerning the acts and omissions alleged in the amended complaint filed on April 28, 2017. If 

plaintiff wants to assert claims against other persons for other wrongs committed against him, he 

should file a new civil rights action asserting his claims against those persons. A copy of the 

court’s civil rights complaint form is attached for his convenience. He should not put the case 

number for this case on any new civil rights complaint he files.

Plaintiff is reminded that his opposition to the motion for summary judgment is due on 

May 11, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 20, 2018

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge
# Gulf of America Day, 2025

Today, I am very honored to recognize February 9, 2025, as the first ever Gulf of America Day.

On January 20, 2025, I signed Executive Order 14172 (“Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness”). Among other actions, that Executive Order required the Secretary of the Interior, acting pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 364 through 364f, to “take all appropriate actions to rename as the ‘Gulf of America' the U.S. Continental Shelf area bounded on the northeast, north, and northwest by the State of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida and extending to the seaward boundary with Mexico and Cuba in the area formerly named as the Gulf of Mexico.”

I took this action because, as stated in that order, “[t]he area formerly known as the Gulf of Mexico has long been an integral asset to our once burgeoning Nation and has remained an indelible part of America.”

Today, I am making my first visit to the Gulf of America since its renaming. As my Administration seeks to restore American pride in the history of American greatness, I think it is fitting and appropriate for our great Nation to come together and commemorate this momentous occasion and the renaming of the Gulf of America.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim February 9, 2025, as Gulf of America Day. I call upon public officials and all the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-ninth.

[FR Doc. 2025-02637

Billing code 3395-F4-P
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 Plaintiff(s), 

v.

 

 Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD:

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application.

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LL

16-cv-07213

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC, et al.

Michael S. Connor Michael S. Connor Michael S. Connor Western Dist N. Carolina Plaintiff, Maquet Cardiovascular LLC

Alston & Bird LLP, Bank of Am. Plaza, Ste.

4000, 101 S. Tryon St., Charlotte, NC 28280

Alston & Bird LLP, 1950 University Ave.,

5th Fl., East Palo Alto, CA 94303 (704) 444-1000 (650) 838-2000 Mike.Connor@alston.com Xavier.Brandwajn@alston.com16152 01/11/17 Xavier M. Brandwajn January 12, 2017.

Case 3:16-cv-07213-WHA Document 26 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 1
SCPR-20-0000065

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE WEY-WEY ELAINE KWOK, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

(By Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign and

surrender her license to practice law in the State of Hawai#i,

filed by Wey-Wey Elaine Kwok, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules

of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and the

affidavits submitted in support thereof, it appears that

Petitioner Kwok has not registered with the Hawai#i State Bar

Association (HSBA) for 2020 but it also appears that Petitioner

Kwok requested the materials in support of the petition in 2019,

and that extenuating circumstances exist that demonstrate the

untimely nature of her petition is due to circumstances beyond

her control. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-20-0000065

18-FEB-2020

12:34 PM
record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Wey-Wey Elaine Kwok, attorney number 6790,

from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective

with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 18, 2020. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Brenda WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Appellee.

No. 1D18-0899

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

- 0166

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. DAKOTA SCHLICHENMAYER,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Counsel fo r Appellant has filed a second mo ti on for extension of ti me to file th e opening br ief in this matter. The Court notes that the brief was due July 16, 2022. Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED th at th e mo ti on for extensio n o f t ime is GRANTED. Appellant shall have unt il August 15, 2022, within which to file the opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2022

07/26/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0166
Richard Allen COONROD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ASIAN TRENDS MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asian Trends Media Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Huang Jian Nan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:  1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Huang Jian Nan Huang Jian Nan Chief Financial Officer May 23, 2011 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 11, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02488]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12651]

Notice of Determinations; Additional Culturally Significant 
Object Being Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``The First 
Homosexuals'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: On December 23, 2024, notice was published in the Federal 
Register of determinations pertaining to certain objects to be included 
in an exhibition entitled ``The First Homosexuals.'' Notice is hereby 
given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that a 
certain additional object being imported from abroad pursuant to an 
agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in 
the aforesaid exhibition by Alphawood Foundation, through its 
subsidiary Alphawood Exhibitions LLC, at the Wrightwood 659 Gallery, 
Chicago, Illinois, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is of cultural significance, and, further, that its 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 
11, 2015. The notice of determinations published on December 23, 2024, 
appears at 89 FR 104603.

Rafik K. Mansour,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2025-02488 Filed 2-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```