alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10378]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse on May 16-17, 1995.
    On May 16, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., the meeting will be held at the 
National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Wilson Hall, 9000 Rockville 
Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. This portion of the meeting will be 
open to the public for announcements and reports of administrative, 
legislative, and program developments in the drug abuse field. 
Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    On May 17, from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., the meeting will be held at the 
Parklawn Building, Conference Room E, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857. In accordance with provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, this 
portion of the meeting will be closed to the public for the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of grant applications. These applications 
and the discussions could reveal confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications, 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    A summary of the meeting and a roster of committee members may be 
obtained from Ms. Camilla L. Holland, NIDA Committee Management 
Officer, National Institutes of Health, Parklawn Building, Room 10-42, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857 (301/443-2755).
    Substantive program information may be obtained from Ms. Eleanor C. 
Friedenberg, Room 10-42, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857, (301/443-2755).
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the contact person named above in advance of the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.277, 
Drug Abuse Research Scientist Development and Research Scientist 
Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs.)

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 95-10378 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1613

CASSANDRA F. BULLOCK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

REHRIG INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:05-cv-00697-JRS)

Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry W. McLaughlin, III, CENTRAL VIRGINIA LEGAL AID SOCIETY, INC.,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. James P. McElligott, Jr.,

MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Cassandra F. Bullock appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of Rehrig International, Inc.,

on Bullock’s sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation

claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bullock

v. Rehrig Int’l, Inc., No. 3:05-cv-00697-JRS (E.D. Va. May 10,

2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 40021 Summary Calendar

Consolidated with 20

- 40022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

TOMAS MORENO

- TURRUBIATES, Plaintiff

- Appellee

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:19

- CR

- 498

- 1 USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 533

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tomas Moreno

- Turrubiates appeals the 52

- month sentence imposed

after his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after removal. He also

appeals the revocation of his term of supervised release that was imposed in

connection with his prior conviction for illegal reentry. However, Moreno

Turrubiates does not brief any argument as to his revocation or revocation

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not prec edent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
July 23, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk Case: 20-40021 Document: 00515500978 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2020No. 20

- 40021
c/w No. 20

- 40022

sentence and, accordingly, has abandoned any related claim. See United States

v. Beaumont , 972 F.2d 553, 563 (5th Cir. 1992).

Moreno

- Turrubiates contends that the district court’s explanation for its

choice of sentence was inadequate in light of his arguments for a variance. We

review this argument under the plain error standard because Moreno

Turrubiates did not raise this issue in the district court. See United States v.

Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 360

- 61 (5th Cir. 2009). The explanation

given by the district court, t hough brief, was enough to satisfy us that the court

heard Moreno

- Turrubiates’s arguments and plea for leniency and that it had

“a reasoned basis for exercising [its] own legal decisionmaking authority.” Rita

v. United States , 551 U.S. 338, 356 (2007). Moreno

- Turrubiates has not shown

any procedural error, let alone plain procedural error.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 20-40021 Document: 00515500978 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2020
#### In re: Angelo MCCOY, Petitioner.

No. 03-7249.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 14, 2004.

Decided May 25, 2004.

Angelo McCoy, Petitioner pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Angelo McCoy petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for return of property, which was filed on September 6, 2002.* He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that mandamus relief is not warranted at this time because the district court has recently ordered the Government to respond to the petition, which should lead to resolution of the motion. Accordingly, although we grant McCoy’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act seasonably. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*

*

 The Government did not receive a copy of the petition when it was filed in the district court.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, P.
Stephen Appelbaum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                    /s/ P. Stephen Appelbaum
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    P. Stephen Appelbaum
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
                                    May 6, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass
Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21.1

|                                                |  | 
|----------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Affiliate                                       |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|AFCO GP, Inc                                    |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Suzhou NSG AFC Thin Films Electronics Co., Ltd  |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films Corporation, Taiwan Branch Office |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films China Company Ltd.                |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films Asia Pacific Limited              |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films Taiwan Co., Ltd.                  |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films Japan Kabushiki Kaisha            |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films Korea Ltd.                        |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|AFCO C.V                                        |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films Belgium N.V                       |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|AFCO Deutschland Holding GmbH                   |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films Verwaltung GmbH                   |  | 
|                                                |  | 
|Applied Films GmbH & Co. KG                     |  |
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOHNNY VANCE ALLEN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 17-cv-00448-YGR 

CASE MANAGEMENT AND 

PRETRIAL ORDER 

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates: 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Monday, February 5, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. 

REFERRED TO ADR FOR MEDIATION TO BE 

COMPLETED BY: March 16, 2018 

LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS: Only with Court Approval 

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: March 30, 2018 

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED): Opening: April 2, 2018 

Rebuttal: April 12, 2018 

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: April 23, 2018 

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE 

HEARD BY: June 12, 2018 [filed by May 8, 2018] 

COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2) Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:01 a.m. 

JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT: August 3, 2018 

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Friday, August 17, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. 

TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH: Monday, September 4, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. for 

5 days(Jury Trial) 

 1 See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for 

summary judgment. 
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet 

and confer in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance hearing on Friday, July 27, 

2018 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have reviewed the Court’s Pretrial Setting 

Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The compliance hearing shall be held in the Federal 

Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior 

to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT 

confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If 

compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off 

calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement 

in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. 

 The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing 

Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All 

Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 27, 2017 

______________________________________ 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 

United States District Court Judge
EX-33.2
(logo) FIS
TAX SERVICES
A DIVISION OF FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES

FIS Tax Services
3100 New York Drive, Suite 100
Pasadena, CA 91107
tel: 626.345.2010 * 866-457.4112
fax: 626.398.5205


Management Compliance Statement


Management of FIS Tax Services (FIS) and formerly known as LSI Tax Services, is
responsible for assessing compliance with applicable servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange
Commission relating to residential mortgage loans (the Platform), except for
General Servicing Consideration criteria (i) - (iv), Cash Collections and
Administration (i) - (vii), Investor Remittances and Reporting (i) - (iv), and
Pool Asset Administration (i) - (x), (xiv), and (xv), which FIS has determined
are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform.

FIS' management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company's compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 2007. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. FIS has
determined the following servicing criteria in paragraph (d)(4) of Item 1122
are applicable to the activities it performed with respect to the Platform:

(xi)   Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance
       payments) are made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates,
       as indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments,
       provided that such support has been received by the servicer at least 30
       calendar days prior to these dates, or such other number of days
       specified in the transaction agreements.

(xii)  Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be made on
       behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged
       to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error
       or omission.

(xiii) Disbursements made on behalf of an obligor are posted within two
       business days to the obligor's records maintained by the servicer, or
       such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2007, FIS has complied in all material respects with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities
and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the Platform.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to management's assessment of compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 2007.

To the best of my knowledge and belief, based on such assessment, FIS has
fulfilled all of its applicable obligations throughout the reporting period.



/s/ Darryl A. De Bond
Darryl A. De Bond
Executive Vice President

January 05, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 800 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 800

   Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Mississippi Farm Bureau 
                              Federation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2022

 Mrs. Hyde-Smith (for herself and Mr. Wicker) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Mississippi Farm Bureau 
                              Federation.

Whereas the American Farm Bureau was created in 1919 to disseminate college 
        research results to farmers;
Whereas, since 1919, the American Farm Bureau has since grown into one of the 
        strongest lobbying organizations in the United States, with 6,000,000 
        members and affiliated services and member benefits that include highly 
        respected insurance companies;
Whereas the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation was officially chartered on 
        October 30, 1922, in Jackson, Mississippi, as a proud state affiliate of 
        the American Farm Bureau;
Whereas C.L. Neill of Jones County was elected as the first president of the 
        Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation;
Whereas the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation is a strong voice of agriculture 
        for farmers, ranchers, and rural Mississippians;
Whereas the mission of the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation is to create an 
        environment in which Mississippi farmers, ranchers, and Farm Bureau 
        members can have a better life and make a better living; and
Whereas October 30, 2022, marks the 100th anniversary of the Mississippi Farm 
        Bureau Federation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) celebrates October 30, 2022, as the 100th anniversary 
        of the Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation; and
            (2) commemorates the history, effective advocacy, and 
        contributions to agriculture in Mississippi of the Mississippi 
        Farm Bureau Federation.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LP**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for three months endedSeptember 30, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy Moeder, Chief Executive Officer andPresident of Hiland Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Partners,LP (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.            The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 13, 2006 |   | /s/ Randy Moeder                      |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Randy Moeder                          |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

 

----
Robert MCKEVITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2283

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 6

Manually 

Filed

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK Document 78-6 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.2


                        [ALPHA VIRTUAL, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In Connection with the quarterly report of Alpha Virtual, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Saif
Mansour, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








                             /s/ Saif Mansour
                             --------------------------------
                             Saif Mansour
                             Chief Financial Officer
                             Alpha Virtual, Inc.

                             November 19, 2002












                                     99.2-1
Item 6. (a)


EXHIBIT 11

Statement Re Computation of Earnings Per Share
(dollars in thousands, except for Earnings Per Share)



                                                 Quarter Ended   Six Month Ended
                                                    June 30,            June 30,
                                                1997     1996    1997     1996  

Net income                                    $4,894    $4,652  $9,702   $8,812

Less:  Preferred stock dividend                   43        42      86       85

Net income applicable to common stock         $4,851    $4,610  $9,616   $8,727

Weighted average common shares outstanding   929,222   940,533 929,222  940,713

Earnings per common share                      $5.22     $4.90  $10.35    $9.28
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Rafeh Hulays, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Netfone,
Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Netfone, Inc. for the period
          ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Netfone, Inc.

Date: February 14, 2008


/s/ Rafeh Hulays
--------------------------------------------
Rafeh Hulays
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)