alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Health Fraud RSS Feed

- Govvi WOW! contains hidden ingredient The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use Govvi WOW!, a product promoted and sold for weight loss on various websites, including www.ebay.com and possibly in some retail stores.
- ENDUREA contains hidden drug ingredients The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use ENDUREA, a product promoted and sold for sexual enhancement on various websites, including www.amazon.com, and possibly in some retail stores.
- ForeverMen contains hidden drug ingredient The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use ForeverMen, a product promoted and sold as an energy booster on various websites, including www.amazon.com, and possibly in some retail stores.	FDA laboratory analysis confirmed that ForeverMen contains sildenafil, the
- TO THE MOON contains hidden drug ingredient The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use TO THE MOON, a product promoted and sold for sexual enhancement on various websites, including www.amazon.com, and possibly in some retail stores.
- Schwinnng contains hidden drug ingredient The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use Schwinnng, a product promoted and sold for sexual enhancement on various websites, including www.amazon.com, and possibly in some retail stores.
- Wild Bull contains hidden drug ingredient The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use Wild Bull, a product promoted and sold for sexual enhancement on various websites, including www.amazon.com, and possibly in some retail stores.
- T XTRA Strength Test Booster contains hidden drug ingredient The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use T XTRA Strength Test Booster, a product promoted and sold for sexual enhancement and as an energy booster on various websites, including www.amazon.com, and possibly in some retail stores.
- Sustain® contains hidden drug ingredients The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use Sustain®, a product promoted and sold for sexual enhancement on various websites, including www.amazon.com, and possibly in some retail stores.
- Ram It contains hidden drug ingredient The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use Ram It, a product promoted and sold for sexual enhancement on various websites, including www.amazon.com, and possibly in some retail stores.
- BIG GUYS Male Energy Supplement contains hidden drug ingredient The Food and Drug Administration is advising consumers not to purchase or use BIG GUYS Male Energy Supplement, a product promoted and sold as an energy booster on the website www.amazon.com and possibly in some retail stores.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING ASUSTEK’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING ASUSTEK’S

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1412

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Asustek’s motion to seal as 

follows. 

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX9148 Selected portions on page 1 GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1423 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 1
Steven W. HAUN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3467

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 12, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DISMISSED.
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation



 Exhibit 4.1 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 
 OF 
 RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 
 OF 
 GREATER BAY BANCORP 
  
 David L. Kalkbrenner and Linda M. Iannone hereby certify that: 
  
 1. They are the duly electing and acting President and Secretary,
respectively, of Greater Bay Bancorp, a California corporation (the “Company”). 
  
 2. Article III, paragraph (a) of the Restated Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended to read as follows: 
  
 “(a) This corporation is authorized to issue only two classes of shares designated “Preferred Stock” and “Common Stock,”
respectively. The number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be issued is 10,500,000 and the number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is 80,000,000. 
  
 3. The foregoing amendment of the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation has been duly approved by the
Company’s Board of Directors. 
  
 4. The foregoing amendment
has been duly approved by the required vote of the shareholders of the Company in accordance with Sections 902 and 903 of the California General Corporation Law. The total number of outstanding shares of the Company is 51,423,952 shares of Common
Stock and 1,630,504 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The number of shares voting in favor of the foregoing amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required. The percentage vote required was more than (i) 50% of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock voting as a separate class, (ii) 50% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class and (iii) 50% of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock voting as a separate class.

  
 We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of
the State of California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct of our own knowledge. 
  
 Executed at Palo Alto, California on July 22, 2003 
  

	
	/s/    DAVID L. KALKBRENNER        
	

	David L. Kalkbrenner, President


  

	
	/s/    LINDA M. IANNONE         
	

	Linda M. Iannone, Secretary
Exhibit 23.2





[King & Wood Letterhead]






Jingmeng High-Tech Building B, 4th Floor


No. 5 Shangdi East Road


Haidian District


Beijing 100085


People’s Republic of China





RE: CHINA DIGITAL TV HOLDING CO., LTD.





Dear Sirs/Madams,





We have acted as legal advisors as to the laws of the People’s Republic of China to China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd., an exempted limited liability company incorporated in the Cayman Islands (the “Company”), in connection with the filing by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of an annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.





We hereby consent to the reference of our firm under the headings “Risk Factors”, “Regulation” and elsewhere in the Form 20-F.





In giving this consent we do not admit that we are within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the regulations promulgated thereunder.








Sincerely,




/s/ King & Wood PRC Lawyers




Date: May 12, 2011
January 21, 2015

Gaines West

West, Webb, Allbritton

1515 Emerald Plaza

College Station, TX 77845

Re: Cause No. D-1-GN-14-001635

 John Doe v Board of Directors of the State Bar of Texas

 

Dear Mr. West:

This letter is regarding your Request for Reporter’s Record in the above-styled 

case.

I was not the Reporter at the hearing on July 23, 2014.

Sincerely,

/s/ Meanette J Salgado______

Meanette J Salgado, CSR, RPR

Official Court Reporter

126th Judicial District Court

P.O. Box 1748

Austin, Texas 78767

CC: Jeffrey D. Kyle, Third Court of Appeals
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LA #4811-5035-0150 v1 - 1 -

CASE NO. 17-cv-00386-WHO

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ELIZABETH TRACHTENBERG, M.D.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CIGNA,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00386-WHO

ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the currently 

scheduled Initial Case Management Conference in this action is continued to May 9, 2017, at 

2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their Joint Case Management Conference Statement on May 2, 

2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 17, 2017 ________________________________________

HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997    
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1996    
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                         460,745    
<SECURITIES>                                   203,210    
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,295,429  
<ALLOWANCES>                                   126,754    
<INVENTORY>                                    461,842    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,852,835  
<PP&E>                                         562,893    
<DEPRECIATION>                                 793,255    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,622,402  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,489,269  
<BONDS>                                        40,000     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0          
<PREFERRED>                                    0          
<COMMON>                                       73         
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,120,165  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,622,402  
<SALES>                                        1,859,019  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,859,019  
<CGS>                                          972,101    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,683,035  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,857      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,657      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                181,456    
<INCOME-TAX>                                   58,066    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            123,390    
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0          
<CHANGES>                                      0          
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,390    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.63       
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.63       
                                               


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6372

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STANLEY D. PARTMAN, a/k/a Goat,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-02063-JFA-10; 3:15-

cv-04534-JFA)

Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 18, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley D. Partman, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stanley D. Partman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Partman has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Orlando SOSA PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-306

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 20, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3


                             SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                  STERLING CHEMICALS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED
                       HOURLY PAID EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN

         WHEREAS, Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (the "Corporation") currently
maintains its Hourly-Paid Employees' Pension Plan (the "Existing Plan");

         WHEREAS, Section 15.1 of the Existing Plan reserves the Corporation's
right to amend the Existing Plan;

         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Existing Plan in order to
meet the requirements of the IRS for a determination letter;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Existing Plan is hereby amended effective as of the
dates specified herein:

         Section 1. Amendment of Section 2.1 of the Existing Plan. Effective
October 1, 1997, the third paragraph of Section 2.1 is amended to read as
follows:

         "In no event shall leased employees be considered employees who are
         eligible to participate in this Plan. A `leased employee' is any person
         (other than an employee of the recipient) who pursuant to an agreement
         between the recipient and any other person (`leasing organization') has
         performed services for the recipient (or for the recipient and related
         persons determined in accordance with Code section 414(n)(6)) on a
         substantially full time basis for a period of at least one year, and
         such services are performed under primary direction or control by the
         recipient."

         Section 2. Amendment of Section 17.1(f) of the Existing Plan. Effective
October 1, 1997, Section 17.1(f) is amended to read as follows:

         "For purposes of this Section 17.1, if a participant was formerly a
         leased employee, a prior period or periods of service with an Employer
         of a Subsidiary while in the status of a leased employee, shall be
         considered as service with an Employer. A `leased employee' is any
         person (other than an employee of the recipient) who pursuant to an
         agreement between the recipient and any other person (`leasing
         organization') has performed services for the recipient (or for the
         recipient and related persons determined in accordance with Code
         section 414(n)(6)) on a substantially full time basis for a period of
         at least one year, and such services are performed under primary
         direction or control by the recipient."



                                       1

<PAGE>
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has executed this instrument this
______ day of ___________ , 2003.

                                         STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.


                                         -----------------------------
                                         Wayne R. Parker
                                         Senior Vice President, Human
                                           Resources and Administration



                                       2
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 628 

Designating May 21, 2022, as ‘‘Kids to Parks Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2022 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. HEINRICH, Mrs. 

MURRAY, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BURR, and Ms. HIRONO) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 21, 2022, as ‘‘Kids to Parks Day’’. 

Whereas the 12th annual Kids to Parks Day will be celebrated on May 21, 2022; 

Whereas the goals of Kids to Parks Day are— 

(1) to promote healthy outdoor recreation and responsible environmental stewardship; 

(2) to empower young people; and 

(3) to encourage families to get outdoors and visit 

the parks and public land of the United States; 

Whereas, on Kids to Parks Day, individuals from rural, suburban, and urban areas of the United States can be reintroduced to the splendid national, State, and neighborhood parks located in their communities; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 628 ATS 

Whereas communities across the United States offer a variety 

of natural resources and public land, often with free access, to individuals seeking outdoor recreation; 

Whereas the people of the United States, young and old, 

should be encouraged to lead more healthy and active 

lifestyles; 

Whereas Kids to Parks Day is an opportunity for families to 

take a break from their busy lives and enjoy a day of active, wholesome fun; and 

Whereas Kids to Parks Day will— 

(1) broaden an appreciation for nature and the outdoors in young people; 

(2) foster a safe setting for independent play and 

healthy adventure in neighborhood parks; and 

(3) facilitate self-reliance while strengthening communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 21, 2022, as ‘‘Kids to 

3 Parks Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of outdoor recre5 ation and the preservation of open spaces for the 

6 health and education of the young people of the 

7 United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe Kids to Parks Day with safe family trips 

10 to parks. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit      10.2**

**Summary      of Amendment to the Loan Agreement**

| No.                        | GDK476780120070027                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Bank:                      | Bank                of China                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Borrower:                  | Guangzhou                City Clifford Development (Panyu) Company Limited                                                                                                                                               |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Date:                      | January                19, 2008                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Subject:                   | Both                parties agreed to amend Clause 9 of the Loan Agreement                No.GDK476780120070027.                                                                                                         |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| New                clause: | Bank                of China cancels the pledge requirement for the borrower and when                the Bank of China deems fit the borrower will be required to provide                a new guarantor or pledge. |

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00797-CV

Martha McDonald, Appellant

v.

U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America,

National Association, as Trustee, Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank,

National Association, as Trustee for Mill Creek Bank Inc. Trust Series 2003-1, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CV35,938, HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Martha McDonald has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant her

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: March 20, 2014
Lorenzo Lamont HARDY, DOC #R51449, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc. as managing member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC, certify that (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 of
TriView Global Fund, LLC fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of TriView Global Fund, LLC.


TRIVIEW GLOBAL FUND, LLC
By:  TriView Capital Management, Inc., Managing Member


By: /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:	August 31, 2007

<page>