alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALVINE DILES,

Plaintiff(s),

    v.

SEARIVER MARITIME INC,

Defendant(s).                                                                      /

No. C 05-1914 MHP

ORDER(Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on

opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the

settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be

restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: May 2, 2006MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01914-MHP   Document 18   Filed 05/02/06   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael E. Lehman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 28, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



|                       |  |        |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 4, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/ MICHAEL E. LEHMAN  
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Michael E. Lehman      
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.a


                                 [CAPMARK logo]

                        Annual Statement as to Compliance
                      For the Year Ended December 31, 2007

                 Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
                                  COMM 2007-C9

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the
referenced transaction, I hereby attest that:

      i.    A review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Master
            Servicer during the period, and of its performance under this
            Pooling and Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

      ii.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance
            Inc. as Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its
            obligations under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout
            the period.

Capmark Finance Inc.

/s/ Mark E. McCool

By:    Mark E. McCool
Title: Managing Director
Date:  February 20, 2008

Inv. 287 Lib A

                                             Capmark Finance Inc.
                                             116 Welsh Road
Real Estate Finance, Investments, Services   Horsham, Pa 19044
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 4:16-cv-07230-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

David M. Lilienstein, Esq. SBN 218923

Katie J. Spielman, Esq. SBN 252209

DL LAW GROUP

345 Franklin St.

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 678-5050

Facsimile: (415) 358-8484

Email: david@dllawgroup.com, katie@dllawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs,

MAHLON D. AND EMILY D.

Sean P. Nalty, Esq. SBN 121253

Shivani Nanda, Esq. SBN 253891

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

Steuart Tower, Suite 1300

One Market Plaza

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 442-4810

Facsimile: (415) 442-4870

Email: sean.nalty@ogletree.com, Shivani.nanda@ogletree.com 

Attorneys for Defendant,

CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAHLON D. AND EMILY D.

Plaintiffs,

v.

CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1 

through 10,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:16-cv-07230-HSG

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 4:16-cv-07230-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, 

ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiffs MAHLON D. and EMILY D. and 

Defendant CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, through their respective 

attorneys of records, that the above-captioned action shall be, and hereby is, dismissed with 

prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Dated: April 25, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

DL LAW GROUP

By: /s/ David M. Lilienstein

David M. Lilienstein, Esq.

Katie J. Spielman, Esq. 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 

MAHLON D. & EMILY D.

Dated: April 25, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & 

STEWART, P.C.

By: /s/ Sean P. Nalty ___

Sean P. Nalty, Esq.

Shivani Nanda, Esq.

 Attorneys for Defendant, 

CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 4:16-cv-07230-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I, David M. Lilienstein, hereby attest that occurrence in the filing of the document has 

been obtained from the other signatory on this document.

Dated: April 25, 2018 By: /s/ David M. Lilienstein

David M. Lilienstein 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. All case deadlines shall be vacated. Each 

party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Dated: April , 2018

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

 4/26/2018
Ruben PEREZ v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-17-0291

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Ct. of Civ. App.
Case 5:16-cr-00519-LHK Document 427 Filed 08/12/21 Page 1 of 3Case 5:16-cr-00519-LHK Document 427 Filed 08/12/21 Page 2 of 3Case 5:16-cr-00519-LHK Document 427 Filed 08/12/21 Page 3 of 3
Levory W. HICKMON, Appellant, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3524

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 02, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
______________________AURORA LOAN SERVICES_________________________
Owner:
N/A
Depositor:
Structured Asset Securities Corporation

LMT 2007-7

745 7
th
Ave, 7
th
Floor

New York, NY 10019
Master Servicer:   Aurora Loan Services
Michele Olds

10350 Park Meadows Drive

Littleton, CO 80124

Trustee:
US Bank, N.A.

Structured Finance / LMT 2007-7

One Federal Street, 3
rd
Floor

Boston, Massachusetts 02110
Securities Administrator:


Subject:
Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:
2007
Investor Code:
H58
Investor Name:
LMT 2007-7

I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2007: 1.    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the reporting period) and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision. 2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout such reporting period.



Certified by:  AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC









By:   /s/ Terry L. Gentry






Name:  Terry L. Gentry






Title:    Managing Director
Leephor SPIVEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3398

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Automatic Option Grants to Directors
 Dionex Corporation  2004 Equity Incentive Plan
 Stock Option Agreement  (Nonstatutory Stock Option)
   1. Vesting.
 2. Number of Shares and Exercise Price.
 3. Exercise prior to Vesting (Early Exercise). provided, however,
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 4. Method of Payment. permitted by your Grant Notice,
 1.




---



##### 



(a) The Wall Street Journal
 (b) The Wall Street Journal
 (c)
 5. Whole Shares.
 6. Securities Law Compliance.
 7. Term.
 (a)
 2.




---



##### 



(b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 8. Special Acceleration.
 9. Exercise.
 (a)
 (b)
 10. Transferability.
 11. Option Not a Service Contract.
 3.




---



##### 



12. Withholding Obligations.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 13. Notices.
 14. Governing Plan Document.
 4.




---



##### 



5.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS.

WR-77,810-03

WR-77,810-05

WR-77,810-06

WR-77,810-07

WR-77,810-08

EX PARTE GLENN DIXON GREEN JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. CR24783-A ,CR24784-A, CR24785-A, CR24096-A, & CR24097-A

IN THE 253RD DISTRICT COURT FROM LIBERTY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted five offenses of burglaryof a habitation and sentenced to concurrent

terms of 15 years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in

the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. SeeTEX.CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends that he was denied time credit while released on parole. Applicant has

alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 508.283(b) and (c); Ex
2

parte Spann, 132 S.W.3d 390 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Accordingly, the record should be

developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General

Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the

record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to

hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants

to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall

immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to Applicant’s claims. 

The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: October 21, 2020

Do not publish
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

 TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 5:17-CV-00561 (NC)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

DENISE M. MINGRONE

(STATE BAR NO. 135224) 

dmingrone@orrick.com 

ROBERT L. URIARTE 

(STATE BAR NO. 258274) 

ruriarte@orrick.com 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 

1000 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015 

Telephone: +1 650 614 7400 

Facsimile: +1 650 614 7401 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR

(STATE BAR NO. 161368) 

JTaylor@mofo.com 

JOYCE LIOU 

(STATE BAR NO. 277720) 

JLiou@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

425 Market Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Telephone: +1 415 268-7000 

Facsimile: +1 415 268-7522 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. and 

CHING-HAN TSAI 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC., et al. 

Defendants. 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00561 (NC)

JOINT STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND 

TO COMPLAINT 

CIVIL L.R. 6-1 

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 11 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 2
1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND

 TO COMPLAINT

Case No. 5:17-CV-00561 (NC)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff 

Synopsys, Inc. and Defendants Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. and Ching-Han Tsai through respective 

counsel that the time by which Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. and Ching-Han Tsai may answer or 

otherwise respond to the operative complaint shall be extended to March 7, 2017. There have 

been no previous modifications of any deadlines in this case and the stipulated extension does not 

affect the initial case management conference, currently scheduled for May 10, 2017. 

Dated: February 22, 2017 DENISE M. MINGRONE 

ROBERT L. URIARTE 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SULTCLIFFE 

LLP 

By: /s/ Denise M. Mingrone

DENISE M. MINGRONE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SYNOPSYS, INC. 

Dated: February 22, 2017 JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR

JOYCE LIOU 

AMANDA D. PHILLIPS 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

By: /s/ Jennifer Lee Taylor

JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. and 

CHING-HAN TSAI 

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION 

I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each 

of the other signatories hereto. 

Dated: February 22, 2017 By: /s/ Denise M. Mingrone

DENISE M. MINGRONE 

Case 3:17-cv-00561-WHO Document 11 Filed 02/22/17 Page 2 of 2
ORDER GRANTING A ONE-WEEK CONTINUANCE OF 

THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PRESENTLY 

SET FOR OCT. 31, 2017 

CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THOMAS E. MOORE III (SBN 115107) 

ROYSE LAW FIRM, PC

149 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 1001 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 813-9700 

Facsimile: (650) 813-9777 

E-mail: tmoore@rroyselaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants and Crossclaimants 

Leonard Gregory Scott and Eureka 

Inventions LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

BESTWAY (USA), INC.; BESTWAY (HONG 

KONG) INTERNATIONAL LTD.; and 

BESTWAY INFLATABLES AND 

MATERIAL CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

PIETRO PASQUALE-ANTONIO SGROMO 

(a/k/a PETER ANTHONY SGROMO); 

WAGMORE & BARKLESS LLC; 

LEONARD GREGORY SCOTT; and 

EUREKA INVENTIONS LLC, 

 Defendants. 

 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG 

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION FOR A ONE-WEEK 

CONTINUANCE OF THE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

PRESENTLY SET FOR OCTOBER 31, 

2017 

AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIM 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

/ / / 
-2- 

ORDER GRANTING A ONE-WEEK CONTINUANCE OF 

THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PRESENTLY 

SET FOR OCT. 31, 2017 

 CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Defendants and Cross-Claimants Leonard Gregory Scott and Eureka Inventions, LLC (“Scott 

Defendants”), filed an administrative motion requesting a one-week extension of the Case 

Management Conference from October 31, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. to November 7, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. Good 

cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the administrative motion is granted, that the Case 

Management Conference in this matter shall be held on November 7, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 

Dated:October 24, 2017 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   ITEM 6. (A)

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR EARNINGS PER SHARE)


                                         QUARTER ENDED      SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                             JUNE 30,           JUNE 30,
                                       ------------------  ------------------
                                         1999      1998      1999      1998
                                       --------  --------  --------  --------
<S>                                    <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $  6,063  $  5,664  $ 11,528  $ 11,983
Less:  Preferred stock dividend . . .        42        43        84        85
                                       --------  --------  --------  --------
Net income applicable to common stock  $  6,021  $  5,621  $ 11,444  $ 11,898

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . .   919,175   928,819   919,520   929,024

Earnings per common share . . . . . .  $   6.55  $   6.01  $  12.44  $  12.81
</TABLE>

<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 5, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 9013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02251]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-116017-24]
RIN 1545-BR36

Administrative Requirements for an Election To Exclude Applicable 
Unincorporated Organizations From the Application of Subchapter K; 
Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of a notice of public hearing on a proposed 
rulemaking and notice of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that would provide 
certain administrative requirements for unincorporated organizations 
taking advantage of modifications to the rules governing elections to 
be excluded from the application of partnership tax rules.

DATES: The public hearing scheduled for February 7, 2025, at 10 a.m. 
Eastern Standard Time (EST) is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martina Greene of the Publications and 
Regulations Section, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and 
Administration) at (202) 317-6901 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice 
of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on November 20, 
2024 (89 FR 91617) announced that a public hearing being held in person 
and by teleconference was scheduled for February 7, 2025, at 10 a.m. 
EST. The subject of the public hearing is under 26 CFR part 1.
    The public comment period for these regulations expired on January 
21, 2025. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public 
hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing 
to submit a request to testify and an outline of the topics to be 
addressed. We did not receive a request to testify at the Public 
Hearing. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for February 7, 2025, 
at 10 a.m. EST is cancelled.

Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,
Section Chief, Publications and Regulations Section, Associate Chief 
Counsel, (Procedure & Administration).
[FR Doc. 2025-02251 Filed 2-4-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
| **Exhibit 32.1** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of China Digital Ventures Corporation a    Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending September    30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Con Unerkov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the    best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    China Digital Ventures Corporation, and will be retained by China Digital Ventures    Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon    request.
    /s/ Con Unerkov
--------------------------
Con Unerkov
Chief Executive Officer
November 20, 2009
```
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 7761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-3201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. GT95-12-000 and GT95-12-001]

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Refund Report

February 3, 1995.
    Take notice that on December 20, 1994, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), tendered for filing a refund report for the 
lump sum refunds made by Columbia on September 30, 1994, in the amount 
of $14,444,180.00 to disburse refunds received from Texas Gas 
Transmission Corporation for rates paid under Docket Nos. RP91-100, 
RP91-101, RP91-102, and RP91-134.
    On January 30, 1995, Columbia tendered for filing a supplemental 
refund report in Docket No. GT95-12-001. Columbia states that this 
filing is being tendered to report to the Commission, and to all 
parties in this docket, additional information about the refunds made 
on September 30, 1994.
    Columbia states that copies of the report are being mailed to 
interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be 
filed on or before February 10, 1995. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceedings. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of Columbia's filing are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-3201 Filed 2-8-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```