alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32245]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP90-95-009]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

December 27, 1994.
    Take notice that on December 20, 1994, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), tendered for filing a semiannual compliance filing 
consisting of work papers detailing accrued interest payments made by 
CIG to its affected customers related to the unused portion of 
transportation credits in the instant docket.
    CIG states that copies of the filing were served upon all of the 
parties to this proceeding and affected state commissions and affected 
parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be 
filed on or before January 4, 1995. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will 
not serve to make protestant parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-32245 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


The following is a list of the Registrant's subsidiaries as of March 14, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
              Name of Subsidiary                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation
              ------------------                               -----------------------------
         <S>                                                            <C>
         Verio West, Inc.                                                      Delaware
         Verio Pacific, Inc.                                                   Delaware
         Verio-Texas, Inc.                                                     Delaware
         Verio-Midwest, Inc.                                                   Colorado
         Verio Southeast, Inc.                                                 Delaware
         Verio East, Inc.                                                      Colorado
         Verio Web Hosting, Inc.                                               Utah
         Verio Operating, Inc.                                                 Delaware
         NTX, Inc. (d/b/a TABNet)                                              California
         TerraNet, Inc.                                                        Massachusetts
         Best Internet Communications, Inc.                                    California
         (d/b/a Hiway Technologies)
         RapidSite, Inc.                                                       Florida
         Internet Access Group, Inc.                                           Ohio
         Great Plains Net, Inc.                                                Ohio


         Qual.Net, Inc.                                                        Ohio
         Tinkelman Enterprises Inc. (d/b/a NYNet)                              New York
         Web Communications LLC (d/b/a WebCom)                                 California
         Verio Internet Holding B.V.                                           Netherlands
         WWW-Service Online-Dienstleistungen GmbH                              Germany
         digitalNATION, Inc.                                                   Virginia
         RapidSite Ltd.                                                        United Kingdom
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2008 (the “Report”) of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Date:
      January 25, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/ Nicholas
      D. GerberName:
                    Nicholas
      D. GerberTitle:
                    President
      and Chief Executive OfficerUnited
      States Commodity Funds LLC,General
      Partner of United States 12 Month Oil Fund,
      LP
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl
Ritter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | */s/ Carl Ritter*            
| | -----------------------------
| | Carl Ritter                  
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (principal executive officer)
| | September 12, 2008           

---
**Exhibit 32****Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer andSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First Business Financial Services, Inc., aWisconsin Corporation, hereby certify, based on our knowledge that the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition anresults of operations of the Corporation.                                                 /s/ Jerome J. Smith   Jerome J. Smith   Chief Executive Officer   August 12, 2005                                                 /s/ James F. Ropella   James F. Ropella   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   August 12, 2005
39
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

egale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

jangelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 100

Roseville, California 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Pedro Orta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PEDRO ORTA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EQUIFAX, INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 3:17-CV-00389-RS

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX,

INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Pedro Orta and defendant 

Equifax, Inc. (“Equifax”), that Equifax be dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, section 41(a)(2), and that each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

//

//

//

//
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

DATED: June 21, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Pedro Orta

DATED: June 21, 2017 Nokes & Quinn

By: /s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr.

Thomas P. Quinn, Jr.

Attorneys for Defendant

Equifax, Inc.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Thomas P. Quinn, Jr. has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Equifax is dismissed with prejudice, and that each 

party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6/21/17
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 32 3 . ANTHONY B. MOORE v . J ANEENE H. MOORE-MCKI NNEY.

An t h o n y Mo o r e f

i l e d t h i s ap p l i cat io n fo r d i s cret i on ary ap p eal fro m t h e t ri al

co u rt ’ s o rd er award i n g h i m cu s t o d y o f h i s m in o r s o n an d s et t i n g h i s ex -wi fe’ s ch i ld

s u p p ort o b l i g at i o ns

. Un d er OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (a) (1 1 ), d i rect a p p e a l s are p erm i t t ed

fro m “ [a] l l ju d gm en t s or o rd ers i n ch i l d cu s to dy cas es award in g

, refu s i ng t o ch an ge,

o r m o d ify i n g ch i l d cu s t o d y o r h o l d i n g or d ecl i n i n g t o h ol d p ers o n s i n co n t em p t o f

s u ch ch i l d cu s t o d y j u d g m e n t s o r o rd ers .” Th e ord er t o b e ap p eal ed i s a fi n al

ju d g m en t i n a ch i l d cu s t o d y cas e m o d i fy i n g ch i l d cu s t o d y

. Th us

, M o ore h ad a ri g ht

o f d i rect ap p eal

. Th e fact t h at h e wi s h es t o ch al l en g e o n ly t he ch i l d s u p p o rt p o rt i o n

o f t he t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er d o es n o t al t er t hi s co n cl us i o n

. See Co l l i n s v. Da vi s

, 3 1 8 Ga.

Ap p

. 26 5

, 2 6 6 -2 6 9 (1 ) (7 3 3 SE2 d 7 9 8 ) (2 01 2 ) (i f t ri al co u rt ’ s ord er fal l s wi th i n s co p e

o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (a) (1 1 ), t h en a d i rect ap p eal i s au t h o ri zed reg ard l es s o f t h e i s s u e

rai s ed o n ap p eal ).

W e wi l l g ran t a t i m el y d i s cret i on ary ap p l i ca t i o n i f t h e l ower co u rt ’ s o rd er i s

s u b ject t o d i rect ap p eal

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (j). Ac c o rd i ng l y

, t h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s

h ereb y GRANTED. M o o re s h al l h av e t en d ay s fro m t h e d at e of t h i s o rd er t o fi l e a

n o t i ce o f ap p eal wi t h th e t ri al co u rt

. If, ho wev er, h e h a s a l read y fi l ed a n o t i ce o f

ap p eal

, he n eed n o t fi l e a s eco nd n o t ice. Th e cl erk o f t h e t ri al co u rt i s DIRECTED

t o i ncl ud e a co p y

o f t h is o rd er i n t he reco rd t ran s m i t t ed t o t h e Co u rt o f Ap peal s

. April 08, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/08/2015
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2015-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 5, 2015 (as amended and supplemented,
or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2015-1, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through
December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer
this 29th day of March, 2017.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-114809, 333-75164, 333-56376,
333-56378, 333-38426, 333-95367, 333-51175, 333-47951, and 333-47967) of Applied Films
Corporation of our report dated September 7, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Applied Films Corporation for the year ended June 26, 2004,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July 2, 2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young
LLP

Denver, ColoradoSeptember
15, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tarpon  Industries,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2007 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Periodic
Report"),  I, James W. Bradshaw,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   the  Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
               Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

          2.   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
               in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 19, 2007                        /s/ James W. Bradshaw
                                               ------------------------------
                                               James W. Bradshaw
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:05-cr-00292-MHP   Document 64   Filed 03/17/06   Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1706. CARLINE JOSEPH v. BANK OF AMERICA

The appeal in this case was docketed on May 13, 2016. Appellant’s brief and

enumeration of errors were originally due on June 2, 2016. On June 3, 2016, this

Court ordered the Appellant to file her enumeration of errors and brief no later than

June 13, 2016. This Court granted an additional extension until August 1, 2016. As

of the date of this order, the Appellant has not filed her enumerations of error and

brief.

Accordingly, Appellee’s Motion To Dismissthis appeal is hereby GRANTED

and the appeal is dismissed as abandoned. See Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a); Reese

v. State, 216 Ga. App. 773 (456 SE2d 271) (1995). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/23/2016

August 23, 2016
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Northern District of California

U.S.A., ex rel. FALLON, et al.

BELL TRANSIT CORPORATION, et al.

3:16-cv-06994-TSH

Defendant Bell Transit Corporation

06/01/2020 /s/ Kaylen Kadotani

Kaylen Kadotani (SBN 294114)

Hanson Bridgett LLP

425 Market Street, 26th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94015

kkadotani@hansonbridgett.com

(415) 777-3200

(415) 541-9366

Case 4:16-cv-06994-PJH Document 39 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Roderick WHITFIELD

CR-17-0225

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Mobile Cir. Ct.
Xavier CARROLL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2047

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Kevin ANDREWS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-16

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Paws

An R Package for 

Amazon Web Services
Agenda

• What can you use Amazon Web Services (AWS) to do

• How to use AWS from R

• Processing big jobs with R, Paws, and AWS Batch
What is AWS good for?

Process data on 

big hardware

• Servers 

(EC2)

• Clusters of servers

(Elastic MapReduce – EMR)

• Batch processing

(Batch)

Host databases

• Relational databases 

(Relational Database Service 

– RDS)

• Data warehouses 

(Redshift)

• NoSQL databases 

(DynamoDB)

Store files

• Simple Storage Service –

S3
Other

AWS

services

• Machine learning

• Translation

• Speech-to-text

• Text-to-speech

• Image recognition

• Natural language processing

• Extract text from documents

• Mechanical Turk

• Queues

• Notifications

• Email

• Auto-scaling

• Functions-as-a-service

• Search

• Extract-transform-load

• etc.
How Paws works

• Paws allows you to use most AWS services from R

# Create a client for the S3 file storage service.*

s3 <- paws::s3()

# Show all files saved in my S3 bucket.

s3$list_objects(Bucket = "mybucket")

* You can provide your AWS credentials in environment variables, config files, and IAM roles
Another example with DynamoDB

• DyミaマoDB is a dataHase ┘here you doミ’t ha┗e to マaミage ser┗ers.

# Write a new item to a DynamoDB table.

dynamodb$put_item(

TableName = "Music",

Item = list(

Artist = c(S = "Queen"),

SongTitle = c(S = "Bohemian Rhapsody")

)

)
Batch processing with Paws

• AWS Batch runs jobs on big machines that stop when done

• Batch uses Docker containers to run your code

• You’ll ミeed to Ireate a Ioミtaiミer ┘ith your ┗ersioミ of R aミd other soft┘are

• You tell Batch what kind of AWS instances to use (e.g. 72 cores) 

• We’re ┘orkiミg oミ a liHrary to do all this for you
Batch processing with Paws

Send R script

to S3

AWS Batch

Submit job

to AWS Batch

Batch starts

a big server

Fetch R script,

run, and output

1

2

3

4
Batch processing with Paws

1. Send R script to S3

s3$put_object(Body = file, Bucket = "mybucket", Key = "script.R")

2. Submit job to Batch

batch$submit_job(

jobName = "my-job",

jobDefinition = "run-r-script",

jobQueue = "big-jobs",

containerOverrides = list(command = "script.R")

)

1. Batch starts a big server (handled by Batch)

2. Fetch R script, run, and output (handled by Docker container)

1

2

3

4

See full code at https://github.com/davidkretch/paws_gasp_2019
Where to 

find out more

Install: 

install.packages("paws")

Documentation: 

https://paws-r.github.io

GitHub: 

https://www.github.com/paws-r/paws
# L_2019008EN.01003802.xml

| 10.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/38

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1612 of 25 October 2018 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 268 of 26 October 2018
  )

On page 50, in the table, under the heading ‘Name’:

for:

‘Mathias/Joseph NIYONZIMA’,

read:

‘Mathias-Joseph NIYONZIMA’.

---
Frank EVANS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 3D19-562

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019. Rehearing Denied May 9, 2019

Frank Evans, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Frank Evans filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging his appointed appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to raise certain claims on the direct appeal from Evans' conviction and sentence for aggravated battery. Included in Evans' petition are claims that appellate counsel (1) failed to raise several instances of trial counsel's ineffective assistance; and (2) failed to raise an unpreserved error (the trial court's failure to provide the jury with a written version of the final instructions delivered orally to the jury).

We deny the petition, as each of Evans' asserted claims is without merit.1*See**Gomez v. State*, 273 So.3d 156, 2019 WL 692912 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 20, 2019) (holding a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is generally not cognizable on direct appeal); *Smith v. State*, 194 So.3d 483, 488 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (same). *See**also**Spencer v. State*, 842 So.2d 52, 73 (Fla. 2003) (holding appellate counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise an error not preserved for appeal, unless the unpreserved error is fundamental); *Nibert v. State*, 508 So.2d 1, 3 (Fla. 1987) (holding that failure to provide jury with written jury instructions was not fundamental error and was waived on direct appeal where not properly preserved).

Petition denied.

1

We deny Evans' other claims without further discussion.