alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 620 

Designating May 5, 2022, as the ‘‘National Day of Awareness for Missing 

and Murdered Native Women and Girls’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 5, 2022 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. MORAN, Mr. 

SCHATZ, Ms. SMITH, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. LUJA ́N, Ms. MURKOWSKI, 

Mr. CRAMER, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. ROUNDS, Ms. HIRONO, 

and Mr. GRASSLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 5, 2022, as the ‘‘National Day of Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native Women and 

Girls’’. 

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives are 2.5 times 

more likely to experience violent crimes and at least 2 

times more likely to experience rape or sexual assault 

crimes compared to any other group of people in the 

United States; 

Whereas, according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some Tribal communities, American 

Indian women face murder rates that are more than 10 

times the national average murder rate; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 620 ATS 

Whereas, according to the most recently available data from 

the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2017, 

homicide was the sixth leading cause of death for American Indian and Alaska Native females between 1 and 44 

years of age; 

Whereas the Hawaii State Commission on the Status of 

Women released reports finding that 64 percent of trafficking survivors in Hawaii identified as being Native Hawaiian; 

Whereas little data exists on the number of missing American 

Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian women in 

the United States; 

Whereas, on July 5, 2013, Hanna Harris, a member of the 

Northern Cheyenne Tribe, was reported missing by her 

family in Lame Deer, Montana; 

Whereas the body of Hanna Harris was found 5 days after 

she went missing; 

Whereas Hanna Harris was determined to have been raped 

and murdered, and the individuals accused of committing 

those crimes were convicted; 

Whereas the case of Hanna Harris is an example of many 

similar cases; and 

Whereas Hanna Harris was born on May 5, 1992: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 5, 2022, as the ‘‘National 

3 Day of Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native 

4 Women and Girls’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 620 ATS 

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

2 interested groups— 

3 (A) to commemorate the lives of missing 

4 and murdered American Indian, Alaska Native, 

5 and Native Hawaiian women whose cases are 

6 documented and undocumented in public 

7 records and the media; and 

8 (B) to demonstrate solidarity with the fam9 ilies of victims in light of those tragedies. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EX-35.4
(logo)WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Wachovia Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
301 South College Street
Charlotte, NC 28288


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Trustee under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been
made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008

/s/ Judith Rishel
Judith Rishel
Vice President


(page)


(logo)WELLS FARGO


Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A


List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust,
Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-30, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wachovia Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2007-C32, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wachovia Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2007-C31, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

4 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust
2006-C29, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

5 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C33, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

6 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for WBTO6C28, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Trustee

7 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for WBTO6C26, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Trustee

8 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for WBTO6C27, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Trustee

9 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for WBTO6C23, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Trustee

10 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wachovia Bank National Association
2007-C34, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee
IDEAL PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE INC., Appellant, v. BOARD OF NURSING, Appellee.

No. 1D19-0595

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 29, 2019

Gregory M. Ochalek, Miami, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Marlene K. Stern, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal, filed May 3, 2019, is denied. The motion is treated as a confession of error. Accordingly, we reverse the January 23, 2019, Order Vacating the Notice of Intent to Terminate Nursing Program and Reinstate Notice of Intent to Place Program on Probation, and remand for further proceedings.

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 42 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 42

Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 
           Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2021

    Mr. Scott of Florida (for himself and Mr. Rubio) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the memories of the victims of the senseless attack at Marjory 
           Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018.

Whereas, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting that took the lives of 17 
        teachers and students took place at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School 
        in Parkland, Florida;
Whereas the people of the United States continue to pray for the individuals who 
        were affected by this tragedy;
Whereas the Parkland community has shown strength, compassion, and unity in the 
        past 3 years; and
Whereas February 14, 2021, marks 3 years since the horrific attack: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) honors the memories of the victims of the senseless 
        attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 
        2018, and offers heartfelt condolences and deepest sympathies 
        to the families, loved ones, and friends of the victims;
            (2) honors the survivors of the attack and pledges 
        continued support for their recovery;
            (3) recognizes the strength and resilience of the Marjory 
        Stoneman Douglas High School community; and
            (4) expresses gratitude to the emergency medical and health 
        care professionals of the Parkland community for their efforts 
        in responding to the attack and caring for the victims and 
        survivors.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer
of China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 16, 2013

/s/ Jianhua ZhuName:

Jianhua ZhuTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 665 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 665

To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Seefried, 
                                 et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 7), 2022

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize testimony and representation in United States v. Seefried, 
                                 et al.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Seefried, et al., Cr. No. 21-287, 
        pending in the United States District Court for the District of 
        Columbia, the prosecution has requested the production of testimony from 
        Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of the Secretary of the 
        Senate, and from Nate Russell and Diego Torres, custodians of records in 
        the Senate Recording Studio, a department of the Office of the Sergeant 
        at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent current and former officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request 
        for evidence relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Daniel Schwager, a former employee of the Office of 
the Secretary of the Senate, and Nate Russell and Diego Torres, 
custodians of records in the Senate Recording Studio, are authorized to 
provide relevant testimony in the case of United States v. Seefried, 
except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Messrs. Schwager, Russell, and Torres, and any current or former 
officer or employee of their offices, in connection with the production 
of evidence authorized in section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joel MCPHERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph SMITH, Warden, Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution; United States Parole Commission, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-7633.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 28, 2004.

Decided May 14, 2004.

Joel McPherson, Appellant pro se. Barbara Murder Bowens, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Joel McPherson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *see Madley v. U.S. Parole Comm’n,*278 F.3d 1306, 1309-10 (D.C.Cir.), *cert. denied,*537 U.S. 1004, 123 S.Ct. 515, 154 L.Ed.2d 401 (2002). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McPherson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*894fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Shawn M. OConnor, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pharsight Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 15, 2004



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    SHAWN M.
OCONNOR                       
|Shawn M. OConnor                              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
0802-0910920-2 [Ernst & Young Logo] Ernst & Yong LLP Phone: (612) 343-1000 220 South Sixth Street, Ste 1400   www.ey.com Minneapolis, MN  55402-4509   Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors  U.S. Bank National Association We have examined management's  assertion, included in the accompanying  Report on Assessment of Compliance with  Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the  servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC's Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities  platform (the Platform)  as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(iv)-  (xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing  platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination  included  testing of less than all of  the individual asset backed  transactions  and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform,   and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our  procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures  were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts  calculated or  reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. ****In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP February 12, 2008 A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Nebuchadnezzar WRISPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-475

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 30, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018355EN.01000201.xml

| 4.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 2 October 2018

appointing three members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for Spain, Slovakia and Cyprus

(2018/C 355/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of nominees submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States as regards their representatives, and by the Commission as regards the representatives of the employers’ organisations and employees’ organisations,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2018 (2) and Corrigendum to Council Decision of 16 July 2018 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2018 to 17 September 2021. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2018 (2) and Corrigendum to Council Decision of 16 July 2018 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2018 to 17 September 2021.

| (2) | The Commission submitted one nominee as regards the representatives of the employees’ organisations. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission submitted one nominee as regards the representatives of the employees’ organisations.

| (3) | Spain and Slovakia submitted two nominees as regards the representatives of governments, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Spain and Slovakia submitted two nominees as regards the representatives of governments,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following three persons are hereby appointed members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period ending on 17 September 2021:

I.   REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS:

| Spain | Ms Clara SANZ LÓPEZ |
| --- | --- |
| Slovakia | Mr Juraj VANTUCH |

Spain

Ms Clara SANZ LÓPEZ

Slovakia

Mr Juraj VANTUCH

II.   REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES’ ORGANISATIONS:

| Cyprus | Mr Evangelos EVANGELOU |
| --- | --- |

Cyprus

Mr Evangelos EVANGELOU

Article 2

The Council shall appoint members who have not yet been nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 2 October 2018.

For the Council

The President

H. LÖGER

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 16 July 2018 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (OJ C 253, 19.7.2018, p. 9).

2

(3)  Corrigendum to Council Decision of 16 July 2018 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (OJ C 325, 14.9.2018, p. 20).

3

---