alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC., and

ALBERT CHIN,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-07213 WHA

ORDER (1) GRANTING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

FOR RELIEF FROM FILING

DEADLINE AND (2) SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A prior order dated May 26 granted plaintiff Maquet Cardiovascular LLC’s motion to

dismiss and held in abeyance its motion to stay defendants’ counterclaim (Dkt. No. 82). On

June 8, defendant Saphena Medical, Inc., moved for leave to file an amended counterclaim in

compliance with the May 26 order, except that it narrowly missed the filing deadline at noon

(Dkt. No. 86). Concurrently with its motion, Saphena filed an administrative motion for relief

from that deadline and explained that technical problems with the Electronic Case Filing system

caused its delay (Dkt. No. 87). The time to respond to Saphena’s administrative motion has

passed and Maquet has not opposed. The administrative motion is GRANTED. 

Maquet shall respond to Saphena’s motion for leave to file an amended counterclaim by

JUNE 22 AT NOON. The response should (1) set forth any argument that the proposed amended

counterclaim would be subject to dismissal, and (2) advise the Court as to whether Maquet

wishes to revive its motion to stay as if it were directed against the proposed amended
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

counterclaim (see Dkt. No. 82 at 14). Saphena may reply by JUNE 29 AT NOON. A hearing on

Saphena’s motion is hereby set for JULY 13 AT 8:00 A.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT XI
                            U.S.B. HOLDING CO., INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998

                                                Three Months        Six Months
                                                   Ended               Ended
                                               June 30, 1998       June 30, 1998
                                               -------------       -------------
                                                   (000's, except share data)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding    12,467,786         12,456,024
                                                -----------        -----------
Assuming exercise of options reduced by 
   the number of shares which could have
   been purchased with the proceeds from
   exercise of such options                       1,229,868          1,241,399
                                                -----------        -----------
Adjusted weighted average shares                 13,697,654         13,697,423
                                                ===========        ===========
Net income available to common shareholders     $     4,952        $     7,903
                                                ===========        ===========
Basic earnings per share                        $      0.40        $      0.63
                                                -----------        -----------
Diluted earnings per share                      $      0.36        $      0.58
                                                ===========        ===========


                                       31
Amendment No. 7 to the National City Savings and Investment Plan



 Exhibit 4.7.8 
 AMENDMENT NO. 7 
 TO THE NATIONAL CITY 
 SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN 
 (as amended and restated effective January 1,
2001) 
  
  
 National City Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and National City Bank, a national banking association, Trustee, hereby evidence the adoption of this
Amendment No. 7 to the National City Savings and Investment Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2001 (the “Plan”). 
 1.
Effective April 27, 2006, Section 1.1 of Article I of the Plan is hereby amended by the deletion of Subsection (64) thereunder and the substitution in lieu thereof of a new Subsection (64) to read as follows: 
 “(64) Variable Pay: Except as provided in the following sentence, the term “Variable Pay” shall mean any overtime pay,
bonuses, commissions, incentive compensation payments or other forms of special compensation paid in cash by an Employer to an Employee. Automobile allowances, parking allowances, relocation expense payments, tuition reimbursements, signing bonuses,
business expense reimbursements, the value of flex-vacation sold, Employer-paid club dues, cash payments upon the exercise of stock appreciation rights, cash payments upon the exercise of or disposition of stock options, dividends paid upon
restricted stock, cash payments of dividend equivalents on restricted stock units, cash payments under any long-term incentive plan, deferred cash payments, Mexican tax refunds, medical supplement adjustment payments and amounts not taxable to an
Employee shall not be included in Variable Pay.” 
  







 This Amendment No. 7 is executed at Cleveland, Ohio this 27th day of April, 2006 but effective as
otherwise set forth above. 
  

									
	NATIONAL CITY BANK, TRUSTEE	 		 	NATIONAL CITY CORPORATION
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher J. Dziak
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jeffrey D. Kelly

	Title:	 	 Assistant Vice President
	 		 	Title:	 	Vice Chairman and CFO
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jon N. Couture

		 		 		 	Title:	 	Sr. Vice President and Corporate HR Director

  

 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

AN PHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

AGODA COMPANY PTE. LTD.,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-07243-BLF 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

CONTINUE CLASS-CERTIFICATION 

EXPERT-WITNESS DESIGNATION 

DEADLINES; GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO CONTINUE CLASSCERTIFICATION BRIEFING AND 

HEARING DEADLINES

[Re: ECF 53, 57]

On September 21, 2018, Plaintiff filed an administrative motion to extend the time to 

designate class-certification expert witnesses so that Plaintiff has enough time to complete nonexpert discovery. See ECF 53. On September 25, 2018, Defendant filed an opposition to 

Plaintiff’s motion in which it agreed to Plaintiff’s request, and also requested that the classcertification briefing and hearing deadlines be continued commensurate with the expert witness 

designation deadline extension. See ECF 57. Defendant argues that extending only the expert 

deadlines will force Defendant to complete a large volume of work over the winter holidays, 

between December 13, 2018 and January 10, 2019. See id. The Court construes Defendant’s 

opposition to be an administrative motion seeking additional relief. Plaintiff did not oppose this 

motion but did discuss in its motion that it believes extension of the other deadlines would be 

unnecessary. See ECF 53 at 1.

The Court finds good cause to extend the deadlines for expert witness designation and to 

extend the class certification hearing date as set forth in the table below, so as to avoid prejudicing 

Defendant. The parties are directed to meet and confer and submit a joint stipulation on a briefing 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

schedule by October 19, 2018. The final class certification brief must be filed no later than 15 

days in advance of the hearing date. 

EVENT EXISTING DEADLINE NEW DATE OR DEADLINE

Expert-Witness Designation 

Deadline for Experts

Offered in Support of, or in 

Opposition to, ClassCertification Motions

September 24, 2018 December 13, 2018

Rebuttal-Expert-Witness 

Designation Deadline for

Experts Offered in Support of, 

or in Opposition to, ClassCertification Motions

October 29, 2018 January 10, 2019

Hearing on Motions for Class 

Certification March 21, 2019 May 2, 2019

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s administrative motion is GRANTED, and Defendant’s 

administrative motion is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 3, 2018

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge
ex10-7.htm


    


    Exhibit
10(vii)

    


    Oiltek,
Inc.

    7808
Creekridge Circle, Suite 105

    Minneapolis,
MN 55439

    


    September 10, 2008

    Mud
Creek, LLC

    ___________________

    ___________________

    ___________________

    


    Attn:  ______________

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Re:

            	
              Convertible Note dated
      November 28, 2006

            


    

     

    Gentlemen:

     

    Reference
is made to the Convertible Note (the “Note”) dated November 28, 2006 between Mud
Creek, LLC (the ”Payee") and Oiltek, Inc.. (the "Company") in the amount of
$5,000.  This will confirm our agreement to amend the terms and
conditions of the Note as follows:

    


    1.           Article
“2” of the Note is amended to provide the that principal balance of this Note,
together with any unpaid and accrued interest thereon, shall be due and payable
in full on April 1, 2009 (the “Maturity Date”), unless earlier (A) accelerated
in accordance with the terms of the Note or (B) converted in accordance with the
provisions of Article “3” of the Note.

    


    If the foregoing reflects your
understanding of our agreement, please acknowledge by signing
below.

    


             
Very truly yours,

    


             
Oiltek, Inc.

    


              By:
/s/ Jill
Allison_______________

    Jill Allison, President

    


    Acknowledged
and Agreed

    


    Mud
Creek, LLC

    


    By:  /s/
s______________________

    Name:

    Title:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A. Cloutier, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                      |  |                       
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|/s/    PAUL A. CLOUTIER                                               |  | Dated: August 04, 2011
|Paul A. Cloutier Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BankFinancial Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







70
8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW

1RUWKHUQ 'LVWULFW RI &DOLIRUQLD

81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

1257+(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

3ODLQWLIIV

Y

'HIHQGDQWV

&DVH1R 

&216(1725'(&/,1$7,21

720$*,675$7(-8'*(

-85,6',&7,21

INSTRUCTIONS: 3OHDVHLQGLFDWHEHORZE\FKHFNLQJoneRIWKHWZRER[HVZKHWKHU\RXLI\RXDUHWKHSDUW\

RUWKHSDUW\\RXUHSUHVHQWLI\RXDUHDQDWWRUQH\LQWKHFDVHFKRRVHVWRFRQVHQWRUGHFOLQHPDJLVWUDWHMXGJH

MXULVGLFWLRQLQWKLVPDWWHU6LJQWKLVIRUPEHORZ\RXUVHOHFWLRQ

܆ Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

 ,QDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHSURYLVLRQVRI86&F,YROXQWDULO\consentWRKDYHD

8QLWHG6WDWHVPDJLVWUDWHMXGJHFRQGXFWDOOIXUWKHUSURFHHGLQJVLQWKLVFDVHLQFOXGLQJWULDODQG

HQWU\RIILQDOMXGJPHQW,XQGHUVWDQGWKDWDSSHDOIURPWKHMXGJPHQWVKDOOEHWDNHQGLUHFWO\WRWKH

8QLWHG6WDWHV&RXUWRI$SSHDOVIRUWKH1LQWK&LUFXLW

OR

܆ Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

 ,QDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHSURYLVLRQVRI86&F,declineWRKDYHD8QLWHG6WDWHV

PDJLVWUDWHMXGJHFRQGXFWDOOIXUWKHUSURFHHGLQJVLQWKLVFDVHDQG,KHUHE\UHTXHVWWKDWWKLVFDVH

EHUHDVVLJQHGWRD8QLWHG6WDWHVGLVWULFWMXGJH

'$7( BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 1$0(

  &2816(/)25

2533526( ́

 

Signature

LENZA H. McELRATH, III, etc. 16-cv-07241-JSC

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

XX

January 4, 2017 R. Scott Erlewine

Plaintiff

/s/ R. Scott Erlewine

Case 3:16-cv-07241-JSC Document 9 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 1
Arsenio STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-1407

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Evoull BACHAT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0988

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
| (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |   |                           |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:       March 16, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Henry      T. Cochran |   |
|                             |   |                           |   |
|                             |   |                           |   |
|                             |   | Henry      T. Cochran          |   |
|                             |   | Chief      Executive Officer   |   |
|                             |   |                           |   |

----
Revised 6/30/05

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On [DATE] and [DATE], we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:

DELIVERED:

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-2-2-06-391-CV

EdDdDiIeE RaAyY AuUsStTiInN	APPELLANT

	V.

RoOxXiIeE SmMiItThH ThHoOmMpPsSoOnN	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY THE COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF  TARRANT  COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On oCTOBEROctober 25, 29006 ___________ and November 8, 2006,  __________, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court'’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)43.4..

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:     DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.LIVINGSTON, 

DELIVERED:    November 2730, 2006
Javoney D. ROBERTS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2244

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-0408

Lower Tribunal No. 19-CF-000481

_____________________________

NEVILLE GEORGE ANTHONY BETHUNE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

J. Frank Porter, Judge.

July 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL and MIZE, JJ., and LAMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge, concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Andrea Flynn Mogensen, 

Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan S. Tannen, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Exhibit 4.2

                            REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT
                               FOR FOREX365, INC.

THIS REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of
January 9, 2009, by and among Lionsridge Capital, LLC, an Illinois limited
liability company (the "Lender") and Forex365, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Borrower").

WHEREAS, on January 9, 2009, the Borrower's Board of Directors approved certain
advances to be made from the Lender to the Borrower to provide the Borrower with
funds for working capital.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:


          1. The Lender agrees to make advances to the Borrower from time to
time at the request of the Borrower. The advances outstanding shall not exceed
$6,000.

          2. The Borrower shall repay the outstanding advances from time to
time, in whole or in part. All advances outstanding shall be due and payable in
full on the earlier of: (i) June 30, 2009, or (ii) the occurrence of a change of
control of the Borrower.

          3. The outstanding advances shall bear interest at a rate of 6% per
annum commencing July 1, 2009.

          4. The parties hereto shall maintain a schedule of advances and
payments hereunder which is attached hereto.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.


                                       FOREX365, INC.




                                   By: /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kevin R. Keating, Chief Executive Officer


                                       LIONSRIDGE CAPITAL, LLC



                                   By: /s/ Frederic M. Schweiger
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Frederic M. Schweiger, Manager
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIZABETH TRACHTENBERG, M.D.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

NORTH AMERICA,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00386-WHO 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to notice of voluntary dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is 

dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall close the case. 

Dated:

______________________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Canyon Copper Corp. - Exhibit 10.8






PROMISSORY NOTE 

	EXECUTED BY: 	CANYON COPPER CORP. 
	  	(the "Borrower") 
	 	 
	IN FAVOUR OF: 	ANTHONY R. HARVEY 
	  	(the "Lender") 
	 	 
	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: 	CDN $25,000 
	 	 
	DATE OF EXECUTION: 	January 13, 2009 
	 	 
	PLACE OF EXECUTION: 	Vancouver, British Columbia
  


FOR VALUE RECEIVED the Borrower hereby promises to pay
to or to the order of the Lender on February 8, 2010, the principal sum of CDN
$25,000, together with interest thereon at the rate of 15% per annum, calculated
and compounded annually, both before and after maturity from the date hereof.


The Borrower waives presentment, demand, notice, protest and
notice of dishonour and all other demands and notices in connection with the
delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Promissory
Note. 

The Borrower agrees this Promissory Note may be negotiated,
assigned, discounted, or pledged by the Lender and in every case payment will be
made to the holder of this Promissory Note instead of the Lender upon notice
being given by the holder to the undersigned, and no holder of this Promissory
Note will be affected by the state of accounts between the undersigned and the
Lender or by any equities existing between the undersigned and the Lender and
will be deemed to be a holder in due course and for the value of the Promissory
Note held by him. 

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia this 13th day of January,
2009. 

CANYON COPPER CORP. 
by its authorized signatory:


/s/ Kurt Bordian 
________________________________

KURT BORDIAN