alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew Buchholz, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Winchester International Resorts Inc. for
     the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Winchester
     International Resorts Inc.

Dated: October 19, 2010

                                   /s/ Andrew Buchholz
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Andrew Buchholz
                                   Chief Financial Officer and Director
                                   (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
                                   Accounting Officer)
                                   Winchester International Resorts Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Winchester International Resorts
Inc. and will be retained by Winchester International Resorts Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Beijing Feijie Power of Attorney



 Exhibit 10.23 
 Power of Attorney 
 We, Beijing Feijie Investment Co., Ltd., a Chinese company with Business License
No.: 110108010608315, and a holder of 100% of the entire registered capital in Beijing Dongdian Wuxian Technology Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Dongdian”) (“Our Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably authorize Beijing PYPO Technology Group
Company Limited (“WFOE”) (to exercise the following rights relating to Our Shareholding during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 WFOE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of ourselves as our exclusive agent and attorney with respect to all matters concerning Our Shareholding, including without limitation to: 1) attend shareholder’s meetings of Beijing Dongdian;
2) exercise all the shareholder’s rights and shareholder’s voting rights we are entitled to under the laws of China and Articles of Association of Beijing Dongdian, including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition
of Our Shareholding in part or in whole; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of ourselves the legal representative (chairperson), the director, the executive director, the supervisor, the chief executive officer and other senior management
members of Beijing Dongdian. 
 Without limiting the generality of the powers granted hereunder, WFOE shall have the power and authority
under this Power of Attorney to execute the Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which we are required to be a party, on behalf of ourselves, and to effect the terms of the Equity Interest Pledge Agreement and Exclusive
Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to which we are a party. 
 All the actions associated with Our Shareholding conducted by WFOE
shall be deemed as our own actions, and all the documents related to Our Shareholding executed by WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by us. We hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by WFOE. 
 WFOE is entitled to re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion and without
giving prior notice to us or obtaining our consent. 
 This Power of Attorney is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable and
continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney, so long as we are a shareholder of Beijing Dongdian. 
 During the
term of this Power of Attorney, we hereby waive all the rights associated with Our Shareholding, which have been authorized to WFOE through this Power of Attorney, and shall not exercise such rights by ourselves. 
 This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese
version shall prevail. 
  

 1 









			
	 Beijing Feijie Investment Co.,
 Ltd. (Official Seal)

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Dongping Fei

	 Name:
	 	 Dongping Fei

	 Title:
	 	 Legal Representative

	 August 5, 2008



  

			
	 Witness:
	 	 /s/ Xuemei Wang

		
	 Name:
	 	 Xuemei Wang

	
	 August 5, 2008


  

 2
Exhibit
31.1





Certification
Pursuant to


Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
Amended





I, John G.
Simmonds, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Eiger Technology,
Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s
internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.








Date: April
      25, 2008
            By: 
      /s/ John G. SimmondsName: John G.
      SimmondsTitle:   Chief
      Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
RESTATED TO REFLECT MERGER WITH FORTE SOFTWARE, INC. ON OCTOBER 19, 1999,
ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING OF INTERESTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                       1,945,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,197,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,489,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   310,000
<INVENTORY>                                    406,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,743,000
<PP&E>                                       3,091,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,365,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,218,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,155,000
<BONDS>                                      1,550,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,967,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,214,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,218,000
<SALES>                                      2,668,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,146,000
<CGS>                                        1,208,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,513,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,255,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                407,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   136,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            271,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   271,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7590

CHARLES A. BIRDSONG,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Dir. of D.O.C.,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior

District Judge. (3:13-cv-00786-JRS)

Submitted: March 12, 2015 Decided: March 17, 2015

Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Birdsong, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Birdsong seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition

challenging his Virginia state convictions for aggravated 

malicious wounding and use of a firearm. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Birdsong has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2017-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in
such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2017 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by
and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2017-1, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from September 20, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer
this 28th day of March, 2018.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
Terry S. CONNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3982

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Debra MAXWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1926

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0001023291
<NAME> TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   21,435,207
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  8,434,859
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       6,885,193
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,728,299
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,483,558
<COMMON>                                     6,979,950
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,247,427
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               8,150,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          843,732
<PREFERRED>                                    190,055
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        14,925,009
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             341,161
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>               3,560,397
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  663,665
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              10,809,053
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               39,483,558
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    5,735,942
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           149,687
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   4,836,278
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   4,836,278
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        899,664
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,721
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 901,385
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       542,046
<NET-INCOME>                                   209,652
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  209,652
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       270,449
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      196,750
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         907,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        

</TABLE>
# L_2020338DE.01001201.xml

| 15.10.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 338/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 338/12

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1151 der Kommission vom 1. Juni 2017 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 715/2007 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Typgenehmigung von Kraftfahrzeugen hinsichtlich der Emissionen von leichten Personenkraftwagen und Nutzfahrzeugen (Euro 5 und Euro 6) und über den Zugang zu Fahrzeugreparatur- und -wartungsinformationen, zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates, der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 692/2008 der Kommission sowie der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1230/2012 der Kommission und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 692/2008 der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 175 vom 7. Juli 2017
  )

Seite 587, Anhang XXI Unteranhang 8 Absatz 4.1.1.3 erklärende Zeile für „MCO2,CS,nb“:

CO2,CS,nb

Anstatt:

„MCO2,CS,nb die nicht ausgeglichene, nicht um die Energiebilanz korrigierte CO2‐Emissionsmasse bei der Prüfung Typ 1 bei Ladungserhaltung, bestimmt nach Tabelle A8/5, Schritt Nr. 2, in g/kg;“

muss es heißen:

„MCO2,CS,nb die nicht ausgeglichene, nicht um die Energiebilanz korrigierte CO2‐Emissionsmasse bei der Prüfung Typ 1 bei Ladungserhaltung, bestimmt nach Tabelle A8/5, Schritt Nr. 2, in g/km;“.

Seite 588, Anhang XXI Unteranhang 8 Absatz 4.1.1.5 erklärende Zeile für „MCO2,CS,nb,p“:

CO2,CS,nb,p

Anstatt:

„MCO2,CS,nb,p die nicht ausgeglichene, nicht um die Energiebilanz korrigierte CO2-Emissionsmasse der Phase p der Prüfung Typ 1 bei Ladungserhaltung, bestimmt nach Tabelle A8/5, Schritt Nr. 2, in g/kg;“

muss es heißen:

„MCO2,CS,nb,p die nicht ausgeglichene, nicht um die Energiebilanz korrigierte CO2-Emissionsmasse der Phase p der Prüfung Typ 1 bei Ladungserhaltung, bestimmt nach Tabelle A8/5, Schritt Nr. 2, in g/km;“.

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanton
C. Heintz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

| | */s/ Stanton C. Heintz*                     
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Stanton C. Heintz                           
| | Chief Financial Officer                     
| | (principal financial and accounting officer)
| | September 12, 2008                          

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAULA XIMENA MUNOZ

, Appellant,

v.

MICHEL FIALLO PEREZ

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 2059

[ August 24, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Cheryl A. Caracuzzo , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502021DR000435

.

Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Harley Gutin of Gutin & Wolverton, Cocoa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, D AMOORGIAN and G ERBER

, JJ., c oncur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Servicer Compliance Certificate**

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2019-1

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Fifth Third Bank, National Association (“Fifth Third”), a national banking association, asservicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2019 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “ServicingAgreement”), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2019-1, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2021 throughDecember 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

[Signature Page Follows] 
**

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 25TH day of March, 2022. 

 
**FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION**By: /s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Senior Vice President
 
*Servicer ComplianceCertificate*

*(FTAT 2019-1)*