alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Eddie Thomas JACKSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Rusty PARRISH, each in his personal and official capacity; William C. Simmon, Sheriff, each in his personal and official capacity, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-6470.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 23, 2004.

Decided May 14, 2004.

Eddie Thomas Jackson, Appellant pro se. Andrew Foster McLeod, Harris & McLeod, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Thomas Jackson appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Jackson v. Parrish,*No. CA-02-1756-8-12 (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT 15.1



February 2, 2004



The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc.



We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-9293, 33-11154, 33-15271, 33-18602, 33-25860, 33-28505, 33-33344,
33-38220, 33-51129, 33-56577, 333-01459, 333-09867, 333-15179, 333-34543, 333-34651, 333-38163, 333-40677, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531, 333-67183, 333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-90907, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-48080, 333-49788,
333-52314, 333-56358, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-73218, 333-98097, 333-100189, 333-101332, 333-101323, 333-102920, 333-108639, 333-109303, and 333-111968; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and 333-63716) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of
our reports dated October 15, 2003 and January 14, 2004 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 28, 2003 and December
28, 2003.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is
not a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



Very truly yours,/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Exhibit 23

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-24 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
Joe STEPHENS v. Darrell VANNOY, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary

NO. 2019-KH-0368

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<CASH>                                           12399
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           10548
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 13725
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      99517
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         186523
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  336715
<DEPOSITS>                                      295764
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2847
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       30604
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  336715
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   3975
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1380
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   266
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  5621
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2125
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3496
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      225
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1605
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1605
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.61
<LOANS-NON>                                        673
<LOANS-PAST>                                        33
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   142
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1987
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3530
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      443
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3326
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1001
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           2325 
        

</TABLE>
Levory HICKMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-936

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 28, 2019

Levory W. Hickmon, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Wolf, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<CASH>                                           12390
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            3988
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  8900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     112199
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         142625
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  291125
<DEPOSITS>                                      254079
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2052
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       27494
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  291125
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   6453
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3257
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   336
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 10046
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  85
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3737
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             6394
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      225
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 190
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3297
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3297
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.73
<LOANS-NON>                                       1284
<LOANS-PAST>                                       258
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   850
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1342
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3083
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      696
<RECOVERIES>                                       139
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2751
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               937
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1814 
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  ELITE ARTZ, INC.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Elite Artz, Inc. (the ACompany@) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (a) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:   May 21, 2007 /s/ Wong Nga Leung Wong Nga Leung Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-40051 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Gordon Eugene Grever, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:22-CR-967-1

______________________________ Before Stewart, Elrod, and Southwick, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gordon Eugene Grever has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Grever has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 7, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40051 Document: 00516886410 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2023No. 23-40051

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordin gly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R . 42.2. Case: 23-40051 Document: 00516886410 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/07/2023
STATE of Louisiana v. Delery WINFIELD

NO. 2019-KK-0640

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

*572Denied.
Kerry MCAULEY, Appellant, v. LINDSEY B. Rowe, Appellee.

No. 1D18-208

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Guillermo PAZ, Appellant, v. Claudia E. LONDONO, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7265

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES RAY FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-92-46-V, CA-96-11-2-V) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Ray Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Ray Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Frazier , Nos. CR-92-46-V; CA-96-11-2-V (W.D.N.C. June 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Discuss <rdar://problem/14838041> FaceTime calls fail with Connection 

Lost - production N90 + iOS 6.1.3 ‹calendar›

Discuss <rdar://problem/14838041> FaceTime calls fail with Connection 

Lost - production N90 + iOS 6.1.3 

organizer: Katherine Kojima <kkojima@apple.com>

location: {M} Chicago (10) {RESTRICTED} IL1 2nd

from: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:00:00 -0700

to: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:00:00 -0700

attendees: Brian Dawbin <dawbin@apple.com> accepted

Paul Chinn <pchinn@apple.com> accepted

Hyeonkuk Jeong <solo@apple.com> tentative

Cyrus Irani <cirani@apple.com> declined

Fabrice Gautier <fgautier@apple.com> accepted

Katherine Kojima <kkojima@apple.com> accepted

Josh Williams <jowilliams@apple.com> declined

Jacques Vidrine <nectar@apple.com> accepted

Justin Wood <woody@apple.com> accepted

uid: 6EDC73CF-B807-456B-900A-C59DE5384A28

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY APL-GRACE_00025227

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-42 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2014-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2014 (as amended and
supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2014-1, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting
Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer
this 30th day of March, 2016.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
Justin Tavarse BARGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3712

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

Case No. 16-MD-02752-LHK 

ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER 

DATA SECURITY BREACH 

LITIGATION

Case No. 16-MD-02752-LHK 

ORDER REGARDING FURTHER 

PROCEEDINGS

On January 28, 2019, the Court denied the parties’ motion for preliminary approval of 

class action settlement. ECF No. 353. By February 7, 2019, the parties shall file a joint status 

report indicating how they wish to proceed. If the parties wish to litigate the case, they shall file by 

February 14, 2019, a joint case management statement proposing a schedule through trial, and the 

Court will hold a case management conference on February 21, 2019, at 11:00 a.m.

If the parties wish to engage in further settlement negotiations, the Court will likely stay 

the instant MDL case for 60 days, at which time the parties shall file a new settlement agreement 

and motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 354 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Antwoine D. GRAY

CR-17-0302

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32





MULTI-CORP INTERNATIONAL INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Multi-Corp International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jean Mann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  January 23, 2014
By:
/s/Jean MannName:
Jean MannTitle:
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer  and Director








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Robert MCQUAIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Luis Raymond GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1873

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Aaron REYNA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1713

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32305]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-475]


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (A. O. Smith Corporation, Common Stock, $1 Par Value)

December 27, 1994.
    A. O. Smith Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2 (d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, in addition to being listed on the Amex, 
the Security is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''). 
The Security commenced trading on the NYSE at the opening of business 
on December 14, 1994 and concurrently therewith the Security was 
suspended from trading on the Amex.
    In making the decision to withdraw the Security from listing on the 
Amex, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and expenses 
attendant on maintaining the dual listing of its securities on the NYSE 
and on the Amex. The Company does not see any particular advantage in 
the duel trading of the Security and believes that dual listing would 
fragment the market for the Security.
    Any interested person may, on or before January 18, 1994 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-32305 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Eugene V. ROSS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-2077

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

p1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145667

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145667

COA: 303837

Oakland CC: 2010

- 234338

- FC

ALEX JEROME PERRY, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.