alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric H.
Brunngraber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                           /s/ Eric H. Brunngraber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Eric H. Brunngraber
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           November 5, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass
Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emerging Media Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Iurie
Bordian, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

                            /s/ Iurie Bordian
                            ----------------------
                            Iurie Bordian
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2009
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all those by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert N. Tenczar, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for such person and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2002 of MMI Products, Inc. under the Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as a director of MMI Products, Inc., and any and all amendments or supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the same together with any exhibits thereto.  The undersigned further grants unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

|SIGNATURE | TITLE
|--------- | -----



/s/Thomas F. McWilliams		Director

Thomas F. McWilliams

/s/Carl L. Blonkvist		Director

Carl L. Blonkvist

Date:  March 28, 2003
Amendment No. 3 to ARCA 2004 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO THE ARCA DISCOVERY, INC. 
 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The ARCA Discovery, Inc.
2004 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) is hereby amended as set forth below: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 4 is hereby
deleted and replaced with the following sentence: 
 Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 15 hereof, the number of shares
of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be 5,157,846. 
 The remaining sentences of Section 4 shall not be amended. 
 2. Capitalized terms as used in this Amendment No. 3 (this “Amendment”) and not otherwise defined in this Amendment, shall have the meanings
assigned to them in the Plan. The Plan shall otherwise be unchanged by this Amendment. 
 * * * * * 







 This Amendment was duly adopted by the board of directors of ARCA Discovery, Inc. by unanimous written consent on
May 31, 2007, and approved by the written consent of the stockholders of ARCA Discovery, Inc. on May 31, 2007, in accordance with Section 16.2 of the Plan. 
  

			
	ARCA DISCOVERY, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher D. Ozeroff

		 	Christopher D. Ozeroff, Secretary


  

 - 2 -
Wisnia ETIENNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 4D19-441 & 4D19-442

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
May 28, 2017

Hon. Judge Richard Seeborg

United State District Court

Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Avenue,

San Francisco, CA 94201

Re; Securitv and Exchange Committee v. San Francisco Regional Center. LLC

Case No. 3:17-cv-00223-RS

Dear Judge Seeborg:

i am a limited partner of Comprehensive Care of California, LP ("CCOO") after I invested

$500,000 into the partnership as part of the EB-5 program that will allow me and my family to become

permanent residents in the United States, i currently am a permanent resident in the United States. I

have completed the immigration process, and I have a permanent green card since 2015. I reside in

Pasadena, CA.

I am writing this letter to Your Honor to inform you of my wishes regarding the operation and

management of CCOO and its nursing home business. 1 am aware that CCOO and the nursing home

business are managed by Comprehensive Care of California, LLC ("CCOC") and Shirley Ma. I am also

aware that both CCOO and CCOC were recently placed under a monitorship.

i do not wish the monitorship to be converted to a receivership, i first visited the CCOO facility

prior to making the EB-5 investment in late 2011, and again while my immigration was pending in 2014.

Based on the drastic improvement of the facility and the financial reports that I periodicaiiy get, it is

apparent to me that there is a great value in Ms. Ma's management of the facility. At this point, i am

confident that my financial investment will be best protected under the continued management of

CCOO by Ms. Ma, and i fear that a receivership may only cause detriment to the quality of care and

value of CCOO.

i do not want any actions to be taken that will risk my financial investment, including placing

CCOO under a receivership.

Respectfully,

David Chua

Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 153 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 4:17-mj-70067-MAG Document 5 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 1
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 129 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a Sergeant 

at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Notifying the President of the United States of the election 

of a Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the President of the United States be 

2 notified of the election of the Honorable Karen H. Gibson 

3 as Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
BERKLEY ASSURANCE COMPANY v. Melissa WILLIS, as Parent/Guardian of Macy Lee Willis, et al.

No. 2019-CC-511

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS**

Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

I do not believe an uncertain sum can be the basis for concursus. In any event, the concursus defendants can proceed by *561reconventional demand to ascertain the amount at issue.
Todd Jeffrey GATES v. STATE

CR-16-1088

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018 Reh. denied March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
A.T., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0066

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit** ___________________________ No. 14-3815 ___________________________ Samuel E. Haley, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Anthony Haynes et al. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena ____________ Submitted: May 7, 2015 Filed: May 13, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.Federal parolee Samuel Haley appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the calculation of his sentence, alleged violations of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, and ra ised a double jeopardy claim. Following careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50027 Conference Calendar

DAVID D. DU VALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-331

- - - - - - - - - - August 20, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David D. Du Vall appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants and the dismissal of his suit concerning the mistaken re-assignment of his rented post office box. We do not reach the merits of the appeal as Du Vall's suit is facially frivolous, insubstantial, and "insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court." Dilworth v. Dallas Cty. Commun. College Dist ., 81 F.3d 616, 617No. 96-50027 - 2 - (5th Cir. 1996) (civil rights suit in which student complained of receiving a "B" in English). As Du Vall's suit was so patently trifling as to fail to invoke federal jurisdiction, his appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED as such. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. We caution Du Vall that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Du Vall is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Tremaine Latroy BAILEM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Leo KREMENCHUKER, Esq., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NOS. WR-87,329-02 AND WR-87,329-03

EX P ARTE EDWARD F ERNANDEZ MEDRAN O, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. CR35988A AND C R36058A IN THE 238TH DIS TRICT COURT F ROM MID LAND COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1

. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of h ab ea s co rp u s . Ex parte Y oung , 41 8 S

. W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). A jury convicted Applicant of four offe nses of indece ncy with a child by exposure and assessed prison terms. The trial court cumulated three of the p ri s o n t erms to eig ht y ear s and probate d the other. Applicant appea led reg arding the stacking order , but the appellate court aff irmed the convictions. Medrano v. State , Nos. 11-12- 00222-CR and 11-12-00223- CR (Tex. App.—Eastland del. J ul. 3, 2014). I n these habea s applications, Applicant contends that he was denied his rig ht, th r o u g h n o f ault2

of his own , t o p u rs u e pro se petitions for discretionar y revie w (PDRs) in this Court afte r his convictions wer e aff

irmed by the appellate court. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Applica

nt also attacks the me rits of the convic tions. The trial cou

r t, a d o p ti n g th e St a

te ’ s p repa red pleading s, rec ommends g ranting late PDRs. The finding s and rec ommendation ar e s upported by the habea s rec ord except as they apply to the probate d conviction. Be cause the probation for that count of conviction has not be en revoke d, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the claims related to it. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art 11.072; Ex parte Valdez , 489 S.W .3d 462 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). This Court holds that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for discretionar

y revie w of t h e judgme nts of the Eleventh Court of Appea ls in Cause Nos. 11-12-002 22-CR and 11-12-00223- CR that aff irmed his convictions in Cause Nos. CR35988, CR36058–C ount I , and CR36058–C ount I I from the 238th Dist rict Court of Midland County

. Applicant shall file his petitions for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandates issues. A p p li c a nt’ s h a b e a s c la im s attacking the merits of the non-probated convict io n s a r e d is mi s s e d

. Torres v. Sta t e , 117 S.W .3d 891 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Ex parte McPhe rson , 32 S.W .3d 860 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Applicant’s habea s claims reg arding the conviction and probate d sentenc e in Cause No. CR36058–C ount I I I are dismiss ed. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . ar t 1 1

. 0 7 2 ; Ex parte V a l d ez , supra . Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J usticeCorrec tional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Deliver ed: September

12, 2018 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vision Industries Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2008. The undersigned certify that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of December 31, 2008. This Certification is executed as of March 30, 2009. By:   /s/MARTIN SCHUERMANN Martin Schuermann
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)  By:   /s/LAWRENCE WEISDORN Lawrence Weisdorn Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey Markin, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Jeffrey MarkinJeffrey
      MarkinPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      15, 2009





This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
#### Hien Phi HOANG, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-60514.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 12, 2004.

*258Anh Quang Cao, Gretna, LA, for Petitioner.

David V. Bernal, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Anthony Cardozo Payne, US Department of Justice, Office of Immigration, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, US Department of Justice, Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, John Ashcroft, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Caryl G. Thompson, US Immigration & Naturalization Service, Attn. Joe A. Aguilar, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Hien Phi Hoang appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ final order of removal for having been convicted of an aggravated felony for which a sentence of at least one year was imposed. Hoang, who pleaded guilty in 1998 to the Louisiana crime of being an accessory after the fact, argues that this court should look beyond the fact of conviction and the definition of the offense to determine whether he actually committed an aggravated felony. However, this court does not allow the review of immigration proceedings to be used as a forum for collateral attacks on related convictions. *See Howard v. INS,*930 F.2d 432, 434-35 (5th Cir.1991); *Zinnanti v. INS,*651 F.2d 420, 421 (5th Cir. 1981). Because Hoang was convicted of an aggravated felony, this court lacks jurisdiction over his petition. *See Nehme v. INS,*252 F.3d 415, 420, 433 (5th Cir.2001). The petition is DISMISSED.

The Respondent has filed a motion for summary affirmance of the BIA’s decision. That motion is DENIED as UNNECESSARY. Petitioner’s motion to amend is DENIED as MOOT.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
-1-

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

UPRR’s Substitution of Attorneys

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL L. WHITCOMB, ESQ. (SBN: 86744)

JOHN D. FEENEY, ESQ. (SBN: 84373)

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Law Department

10031 Foothills Boulevard, Suite 200

Roseville, CA 95747

General: 916-789-6400

Direct: 916-789-6231

Fax: 916-789-6227

Attorneys for Defendant, Counter-Claimant

and Counter-Defendant UNION PACIFIC 

RAILROAD COMPANY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DAVID CHAD GLOW,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; 

HOWARD REDMUND, and DOES 1 through

50, inclusive, 

Defendants.

___________________________________________

AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS.

Case No.: C 05-01933 MMC

DEFENDANT, UNION PACIFIC 

RAILROAD COMPANY’S

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS

Defendant, Counter-complainant, Counter-Defendant UNION PACIFIC

RAILROAD COMPANY, hereby substitutes the following law firm:

Adrian L. Randolph

Randolph, Cregger & Chalfant, LLP

1030 “G” Street

Sacramento, CA 95814

916-443-4443 – phone 

916-443-2124 – fax

alr@randolphlaw.net

;

ORDER THEREON

Case 3:05-cv-01933-MMC Document 30 Filed 06/30/06 Page 1 of 2
-2-

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

UPRR’s Substitution of Attorneys

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In place and stead of John D. Feeney, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Law 

Department, 10031 Foothills Boulevard, Suite 200, Roseville, California, 916-789-

6231-phone, 916-789-6238-fax.

Consent to substitute counsel is hereby authorized.

DATED: June 26, 2006 By: /S/ Michael L. Whitcomb

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Defendant/Counter-claimant/Counterdefendant

I consent to this substitution.

DATED: June 26, 2006 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

/S/ John D. Feeney

By:

JOHN D. FEENEY

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant/Counter-defendant

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

I accept this substitution.

DATED: June 26, 2006 RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

/S/ Adrian L. Randoph

By:

ADRIAN L. RANDOLPH

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant/Counter-defendant

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

ORDER

The foregoing Substitution of Attorneys is hereby approved.

DATED:

JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT – NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

:cav

G:\Lawadmin\Team #E\JDF\Glow, David\SUB-ATTY.doc

June 30, 2006

Case 3:05-cv-01933-MMC Document 30 Filed 06/30/06 Page 2 of 2