1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 1 3

- 1005V

Filed: D ecember 7, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED

S ARAH WILLIAMSON

, *

* Special Master Hamilton

- Fieldman

Petitioner, *

v. * Attorneys’ F ees and Costs; Reasonable

* Amount Reques ted to which Respondent

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Does Not Object.

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

D anielle A. Strait

, M aglio Christophe r & Toale

, PA, Washington, DC

, for Petitioner.

J ulia W. McInerny

, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION 1

On D ecember 19, 2013

, S arah Williamson (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for

compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa

- 1

et seq. (2006) (“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that the administration of an influenza (“flu”)

vaccine on October 24 , 2012 caused her to suffer from Guillain

- Barré Syndrome (“GBS”)

. Petition (“Pet.”) at 1

- 3

. On S eptember 25, 2015, th e undersigned i

ssued a decision awarding

compensation to Petitioner

. Decision, ECF No. 3 8

.

On D ecember 7

, 2015

, P etitioner filed a Stipulation for Attorneys ’ Fees and Costs

. Pursuant to their Stipulation, t he parties have agreed to an award of $ 1 8,002.71 i n attorneys’ fees

and cost s. In accordance with General Order #9, Petitioner stated t hat she has not incu

rred any

costs in pursuit of this claim

. D eclaration, ECF No. 43.

The undersigned finds that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a

reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and

appropriate. Accordingly , the undersigned hereby awards the amount of $ 18,002.71 , in the

form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, D anielle A.

1 The undersigned intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’

website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 not e (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each

party has 14 days within which to file a motion for redaction “of any information furnished by that party

(1) that is trade secret or commercial or financial information and is privileged or confidential, or (2) that

are medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion

of privacy.” In the absence of such motion, the entire decision will be available to the public. Id.2

Strait, of Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, 1605 Main Street, Suite 710, Sarasota, FL

34236

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of

the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’

stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Lisa D. Hamilton

- Fieldman

Lisa D. Hamilton

- Fieldman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of

notice renouncing the right to seek review.