alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12638]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Sargent and Paris” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2025-01451 Filed 1-21-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Keely THURESON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Marty WILLIAMS, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2236

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of prohibition is denied. Denied as moot.
Dylan Patrick THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-723

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 15.1

February 4, 2008

The Board of Directors and Stockholders, Sun Microsystems, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-18602, 33-33344, 333-38163, 333-40675, 333-59503, 333-62987, 333-65531,
333-72413, 333-86267, 333-89391, 333-35796, 333-45540, 333-52314, 333-59466, 333-61120, 333-62034, 333-68140, 333-98097, 333-101332, 333-108639, 333-109303, 333-111968, 333-114550, 333-122586, 333-127063, 333-128324, 333-128325, 333-131507,
333-138593, and 333-147268; and Form S-3 Nos. 333-81101 and 333-142795) of Sun Microsystems, Inc. of our reports dated November 5, 2007 and February 4, 2008, relating to the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of
Sun Microsystems, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarters ended September 30, 2007 and December 30, 2007.



Very truly yours,/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Yulong Guo, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Yulong GuoYulong Guo
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2007
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES ex rel. DONNA M.

McLEAN and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

ex rel DONNA M. McLEAN,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, THE

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND

FAMILY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA

COUNTY, KENNETH BORELLI,

LAWRENCE GALLEGOS, EPIFANIO (“J.R.”)

REYNA, TANYA BEYERS, DR. DEE

SCHAEFFER, DR. TOMMIJEAN THOMAS,

DR. RICHARD PERILLO and DOES 1-100,

Defendants. /

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

Counter-claimant,

 v.

DONNA M. McLEAN and DOES 1-100,

Counter-defendants. /

No. C05-01962 HRL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

FAILURE TO APPEAR

A case management conference was held in this matter on August 1, 2006. Counsel for

Donna M. McLean was present. Melissa Kiniyalocts, counsel for defendants County of Santa

Clara, Kenneth Borelli, Lawrence Gallegos, Epifanio Reyna and Tanya Beyers, failed to appear.

*E-FILED ON 8/1/06*

Case 5:05-cv-01962-HRL Document 46 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS ORDERED THAT Ms. Kiniyalocts appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor of the

United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California on August 8, 2006 at

10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why she should not be sanctioned for failure to appear at the

case management conference. McLean’s counsel need not appear at the order to show cause

hearing; but he will be permitted to appear at that hearing by telephone, if he so chooses.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

August 1, 2006

Case 5:05-cv-01962-HRL Document 46 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:05-cv-1962 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Melissa R. Kiniyalocts melissa.kiniyalocts@cco.co.scl.ca.us 

Douglas A Linde dal@lindelaw.net, ela@lindelaw.net 

Sara McLean sara.mclean@usdoj.gov 

Sara Winslow sara.winslow@usdoj.gov, kathy.terry@usdoj.gov; claire.muller@usdoj.gov 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have

not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Courtesy copy will be mailed to:

Julia Clayton

Deputy Attorney General

California Attorney General’s Office

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Case 5:05-cv-01962-HRL Document 46 Filed 08/01/06 Page 3 of 3
Mesiah ABERCROMBIE v. STATE

CR-17-0008

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 695 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 695

       Designating June as ``National Annuity Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2022

   Mr. Moran (for himself and Mr. Grassley) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating June as ``National Annuity Awareness Month''.

Whereas annuities provide a predictable way to meet immediate, ongoing, and 
        future financial obligations and objectives in retirement;
Whereas surveys consistently indicate that the vast majority of individuals in 
        the United States are looking for a financial solution that provides the 
        benefits offered by annuities, specifically the ability to address the 
        critical concern of running out of money during retirement;
Whereas outliving retirement savings can--

    (1) create a financial hardship that reduces the standard of living in 
retirement;

    (2) defeat the fulfillment of legacy goals; and

    (3) require dependence on family and friends for monetary support;

Whereas millions of individuals in the United States currently lack an adequate 
        level of guaranteed income in retirement to ensure a secure financial 
        future for themselves and their loved ones;
Whereas research indicates that an owner of an annuity has a higher confidence 
        in overall retirement readiness;
Whereas an annuity is the only product in the financial marketplace that can 
        provide guaranteed lifetime income;
Whereas determining the type of annuity to buy and when to take income is one of 
        the most important financial decisions a consumer will ever make, and 
        individuals and families can benefit greatly from the expert guidance of 
        a financial professional; and
Whereas numerous stakeholders who support annuities have designated June as 
        ``National Annuity Awareness Month'', the goals of which are--

    (1) to educate consumers on annuity benefits;

    (2) to support access to annuities to meet the individual financial 
goals of consumers; and

    (3) to encourage savers to seek professional guidance to implement 
annuities effectively in income and legacy planning: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates June as ``National Annuity Awareness 
        Month''; and
            (2) calls on the United States Government, the States, 
        localities, schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and 
        the people of the United States to observe National Annuity 
        Awareness Month with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Health Partners, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), David M.
Daniels, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alex Soufflas, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his
knowledge:

     (1)  the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                           /s/ David M. Daniels
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David M. Daniels
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Alex Soufflas
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Alex Soufflas
                                           Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2006
Timothy Daniel WELLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4673

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Chloe P. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1192

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Branden BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JIM HURD, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

Case No.17-cv-00060-JST 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This case is set for an initial case management conference on March 29, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 

Because the complaint has not yet been served, the Court CONTINUES that conference to April 

26, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. A case management statement is due on April 17, 2017. 

By that time, more than 90 days will have elapsed since the filing of the complaint. ECF 

No. 1. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in part, 

If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court ‒

on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff ‒ must dismiss the action 

without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a 

specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must 

extend the time for service for an appropriate period. 

If the complaint in this case has not been served by April 5, 2017, as demonstrated by a 

proof of service filed by April 12, 2017, then Plaintiffs, and each of them, are ORDERED TO 

SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:17-cv-00060-JST Document 6 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

A written response to this Order to Show Cause is due April 17, 2017. If good cause is not 

shown, or no response is filed, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2017

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00060-JST Document 6 Filed 03/24/17 Page 2 of 2
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40891

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ADRIAN MARTINEZ-CASILLAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CR-713-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adrian MartinezCasillas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez-Casillas has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16

- 0022 Filed December 21, 2016
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. ROBERT MICHAEL AGUIRRE , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Henry W. Latham II , Judge.

Robert Aguirre appeals his conviction and sentence for homicide by vehicle, driving while intoxicated , fo llowing a jury trial

. AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith , State Appellate Defender, and Melinda J. Nye , Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Timothy M. Hau , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Mullins and Bower, JJ.2

MULLINS, Judge. Robert Ag uirre appeals his convict ion and sentence for homicide by vehicle , driving while intoxicated , following a jury trial. H e argues (1) the evidence was insufficient to prove the necessary causal connection between his intoxicated driving and the death of the victim and (2) his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to request a jury instruction on scope of liability. The State responds there wer e several facts demonstrating A g uirre’s intoxication level of .238 blood alcohol concentration showed impairment

— including bloodshot eyes, slow and slurred speech, confused thinking, and failure of field sobriety tests

— and establish ed sufficient facts upon which a jury could find Ag uirr e’s intoxicated driving caused the death of the victim. The State also argues that , under the facts of this case, the jury was properly instructed on causation and trial counsel was not ineffective for not asking the trial court to instruct on scope of li ability.

“ We re view sufficiency

- of

- the

- evidence challenges for correction of errors at law. ” State v. Vance , 790 N.W.2d 775 , 783 (Iowa 2010)

. “We will sustain the jury’s verdict if it is supported by substantial evidence.” Id. “Evidence is
substantial if it would convince a rational trier of fact the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. (quoting State v. Jorgensen , 758 N.W.2d 830, 834 (Iowa 2008)). We review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See State v. Thorndike , 860 N.W.2d 316, 319 (Iowa 2015). We generally preserve ineffective

- assistance

- of

- counsel claims for postconviction relief but will consider3

the claims o n direct appeal if the record is adequate. See State v. Clay , 824 N.W.2d 488, 494 (Iowa 2012). We find substantial evidence to support the jury verdict that Aguirre’s intoxicated driving was the cause of the death of the victim and affirm on this issue. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(a), (b). The record is adequate for us to determine
trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to ask the trial court to instruct on scope of liability , and we affirm on this issue. See Iowa Ct. R . 21.23(a), (e).
AFFIRMED

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2

)

3

4 Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal, LLC

5 Plaintiff,

6

7

vs.

8 City of Oakland

9 Defendant.

10

11

) Case Number: 3:16-CV-7014-VC

)

) [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING THE

) CITY OF OAKLAND’S REQUEST TO

) COMPEL RESPONSES TO CONTENTION

) INTERROGATORIES

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

12 Now before the Court is Defendant City of Oakland’s (the “City’s”) request that Plaintiff

13 Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal, LLC (“OBOT”) be compelled to respond to contention

14 interrogatories propounded by the City immediately, weeks in advance of the close of fact

15 discovery set by this Court (October 20, 2017). Upon consideration of the joint letter submitted

16 by the parties, and all other materials deemed necessary by the Court, the Court finds that the

17 City of Oakland has not met its burden of justification and hereby DENIES the City’s request.

18

19 IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

21 Dated: October 3 , 2017 ________________________

22 The Honorable Vince Chhabria

Judge, United States District Court

23 for the Northern District of California

24

25

26

27

28
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-732

_____________________________

ASHLEY L LESTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

John Jay Gontarek, Judge.

September 22, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Shawn O’Connor, Chief Executive Officer of PharsightCorporation (the “Company”), and Cynthia Stephens, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of his or her knowledge: 

 

1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004, and to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 15th day of June 2004. 

 

/s/    SHAWN M. O’CONNOR, CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER 

 

/s/    CYNTHIA STEPHENS, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER