alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT XI
                            U.S.B. HOLDING CO., INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998

                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                            March 31, 1998
                                                          ------------------
                                                      (000's, except share data)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding                  12,438,109

Assuming exercise of options reduced by
  the number of shares which could have
  been purchased with the proceeds from
  exercise of such options                                      1,284,378
                                                              -----------

Adjusted weighted average shares                               13,722,487
                                                              -----------

Net income                                                    $     2,951

Less: Preferred stock dividend requirements                            --
                                                              -----------

Net income available to common shareholders                   $     2,951
                                                              ===========

Basic earnings per share                                      $       .24
                                                              ===========

Diluted earnings per share                                    $       .22
                                                              ===========
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-11864

 

 

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS6 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20682-20683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10414]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages; Issuance of Certificate 
(Casualty)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of section 2, Pub. L. 89-777 (46 U.S.C. 817(d)) and 
[[Page 20683]] the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing 
regulations at 46 CFR part 540, as amended:

Crystal Cruises, Inc. and Crystal Ship (Bahamas) Limited, 2121 Avenue 
of the Stars, Suite 200, Los Angeles, California 90067

Vessel: CRYSTAL SYMPHONY

    Dated: April 24, 1995.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-10414 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
Johnkino TERRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2179

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Companies.
 /s/ Erik Olsson

Erik OlssonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 16, 2010/s/ David Mathieson

David MathiesonSenior Vice President, and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 16, 2010
**Exhibit 34.4**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Board of Directors 

BancTec, Inc. 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that BancTec, Inc. (“the Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for remittance processing services including asset-backed securities transactions involving credit cardreceivables conducted by Discover Card Master Trust I and Discover Card Execution Note Trust (“the Platform”) that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or were notrequired to be registered where the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period as of and for the year ended November 30, 2010. The Company has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are notapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended November 30, 2010. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about theCompany’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions andsecurities constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by the report.Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurredprior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that BancTec, Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria, as described within Management’s Report, as of and for the year ended November 30, 2010 for the Platform is fairly stated, inall material respects. 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

February 15, 2011
Exhibit 10.2.8


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE


TO THE


CANDELA CORPORATION


1990 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


 


The Board of Directors of Candela Corporation has amended the Candela
Corporation 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) as follows:


 


1.   Effective January 19, 2009, Article 5
of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of the second
paragraph:


 


For Payment Periods beginning on or after January 1, 2009, the
Option Price for each Payment Period shall be 85% of the average market price
of the Company’s Common Stock on the last business day of the Payment Period,
rounded up to the nearest penny.


 


All provisions of the Plan not specifically mentioned in this Amendment
shall be considered modified to the extent necessary to be consistent with the
changes made in this Amendment.
January 24 , 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHIKE KODILINYE NZEW I , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 00413

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , that the appellant pay all costs expended in this

app eal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 20779-20780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10336]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board has submitted the 
following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL(S):
(1) Collection title: Supplement to Claim of Person Outside the United 
States.
(2) Form(s) submitted: G-45.
(3) OMB Number: 3220-0155.
(4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: June 30, 1995.
(5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
(6) Respondents: Individuals or households.
(7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 100.
(8) Total annual responses: 100.
(9) Total annual reporting hours: 17.
(10) Collection description: Under Public Law 98-21 Railroad Retirement 
beneficiaries' Tier I or overall minimum portion of an annuity and 
Medicare benefits payable under the Railroad Retirement Act may be 
withheld effective January 1, 1985. The collection obtains the 
information [[Page 20780]] needed by the Railroad Retirement Board to 
implement the benefit withholding provisions of Pub. L. 98-21.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Copies of the form and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 
10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC. 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 95-10336 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief financial officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to an Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated March 27, 2014, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  Dated:  March 17, 2015   /s/   Bahir ManiosBahir   ManiosCFO,   Brookfield Infrastructure Group L.P.
Warren Allen WILLIAMS Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5838

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Daniel Stephen SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 2D18-4450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 26, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 14-1173

___________________________ American Family Mutu al Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v. John Martin Donaldson lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant Todd Richard Patton; Jacob Todd Patton lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant s

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________ Submitted: October 7, 2014 Filed: October 14, 2014 [Unpublished]

____________ Before RILEY, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and BYE, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. This is an insurance coverage dispute arising out of an alcohol-related incident involving a motor vehicle. After hea vy drinking, eighteen-year-old Jacob Pattonoperated a motor vehicle while his friend, John Donalds on, was a passenger in the vehicle. Someone observed Patton's erratic driving and called the police. When the police located Patton's vehicle, a chase ensued which led to a crash in which Donaldson suffered serious injuries. Patton faced criminal charge s as a result of the incident. Donaldson sought insurance coverage for his injuries under an umbrella policy insuring Patton issued by American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family). The umbrella policy contains two relevant exclusions. The first exclusion provides the policy does not c over intentional injuries, defined as "injury caused by or at the direction of any insured even if th e actual injury is different than that which was expected or intended from the standpoint of any insured." The second exclusion provides the policy does not "cover injury arising out of violation of a penal law or ordinance by or with the knowledge or consent of an insured when an insured is convicted of such violation." In this appeal, Donaldson seeks reversal of the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of American Family on th e grounds the intentional injury exclusion precludes coverage. After th e appeal was taken, Ameri can Family filed a motion to supplement the record, asking us to take judi cial notice of the fact that Jacob Patton had been convicted of a felony offense aris ing out of the alcohol-related motor vehicle incident following the district court's grant of summary judgment. Rather than urging us to consider Patton' s violation of law as an alternative ground for affirming the district court, how ever, American Family represents "there are subsequent events surrounding the convic tion that would need to be addressed in the first instance by the district court." Appellee's Br. at 51. Under these circumstances, we decline to exercise jurisdiction at this time. Instead, we remand this case to the district court to address in the first instance any -2-remaining unresolved issues surrounding Patton's criminal conviction that may prevent us from considering the violation-of-law exclusion as an alternative ground for affirming the district court. So ordered.

______________________________

-3-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          63,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,590,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (49,426)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,241,465
<PP&E>                                      22,319,220
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,984,103)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,711,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,590,436
<BONDS>                                      6,675,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    203,580
<COMMON>                                       407,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,956,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,711,337
<SALES>                                        900,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,554,594
<CGS>                                        3,962,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,920,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                31,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             242,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                145,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            145,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,209
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                       206,186
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     206,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        200,000
<COMMON>                                             6,186
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       206,186
<SALES>                                             17,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    17,155
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     17,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 17,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17,155
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00
        

</TABLE>
Darnell Jarmane PERKINS v. STATE

CR-17-0180

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 218TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF ATASCOSA COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on December 3, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

Cynthia Baeza, Appellant

V.

Floyd and Helen Zahn, Appellee

No. 04-14-00777-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 13-07-0622-CVA

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred 

them.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of 

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on February 3, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00777-CV

Cynthia Baeza

v.

Floyd and Helen Zahn

(NO. 13-07-0622-CVA IN 218TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF ATASCOSA COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE $10.00 E-PAID EDWARD CANO

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF 

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of 

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and 

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Fourth District of Texas, this February 3, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853