Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Proposed Rules 20949

Commodity Parts per

million

Poultry, fat ................................. 0.01

Poultry, meat ............................. 0.01

Poultry, mbyp ............................ 0.01

Sheep, fat ................................. 3.0

Sheep, meat ............................. 0.2

Sheep, mbyp ............................. 0.2

Soybeans .................................. 0.01

Sorghum, grain ......................... 0.2

Sorghum, grain dust ................. 1.5

Sunflower, seeds ...................... 0.2

Sunflower, forage ...................... 0.20

Tomatoes .................................. 0.1

Wheat, grain ............................. 0.05

Wheat, forage ........................... 2.0

Wheat, hay ................................ 2.0

Wheat, straw ............................. 2.0

Wheat, grain dust ..................... 2.0

PART 185—[AMENDED]

2. In part 185:

a. The authority citation for part 185

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 348.

b. By redesignating § 185.1310 as

§ 185.3765, by revising the heading, and

by adding new paragraph (c), to read as

follows:

§ 185.3765 Lambda-cyhalothrin.

* * * * *

(c) A tolerance, to expire on

November 15, 1997, is established for

the combined residues of the insecticide

lambda-cyhalothrin and its epimer

expressed as lambda-cyhalothrin, a 1:1

mixture of (S)-α-cyano-3-

phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-(1R,3R)-3-(2-chloro3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and

(R)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-

(1S,3S)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and

its epimer of lambda-cyhalothrin, a 1:1

mixture of (S)-α-cyano-3-

phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-(1S,3S)-3-(2-chloro3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and

(R)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-

(1R,3R)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate in or

on the following food commodities:

Food Parts per

million

Corn, grain flour ........................ 0.15

Sunflower, oil ............................ 0.30

Wheat, bran .............................. 0.2

PART 186—[AMENDED]

3. In part 186

a. The authority citation for part 186

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 348.

b. By revising § 186.3765, to read as

follows:

§ 186.3765 Lambda-cyhalothrin.

A tolerance, to expire on November

15, 1997, is established for the

combined residues of the insecticide

lambda-cyhalothrin and its epimer

expressed as lambda-cyhalothrin, a 1:1

mixture of (S)-α-cyano-3-

phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-(1R,3R)-3-(2-chloro3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and

(R)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-

(1S,3S)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and

its epimer of lambda-cyhalothrin, a 1:1

mixture of (S)-α-cyano-3-

phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-(1S,3S)-3-(2-chloro3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and

(R)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-

(1R,3R)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop1-enyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate in or

on the following feed commodities:

Food Parts per

million

Sunflower, hulls ........................ 0.50

Tomato pomace (dry or wet) .... 6.0

Wheat, bran .............................. 0.2

[FR Doc. 95–10612 Filed 4–26–95; 3:36 pm]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Chapter I

[CC Docket No. 94–54, FCC 95–149]

Interconnection and Resale

Obligations of Commercial Mobile

Radio Service Providers

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Second notice of proposed rule

making.

SUMMARY: This action invites comment

to assist the Commission in formulating

broad policy guidelines involving the

common carrier obligations of

commercial mobile radio service

(CMRS) providers with respect to

CMRS-to-CMRS interconnection. The

NPRM also tentatively concludes that its

policy regarding the resale obligations of

cellular carriers should be extended to

most CMRS providers. This NPRM was

issued to continue the proceeding

initiated by the Commission last year in

a Notice of Inquiry regarding

interconnection and resale obligations

of CMS providers.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before June 14, 1995, and reply

comments on or before July 14, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Judy Argentieri or Barbara Esbin,

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,

Policy Division, (202) 418–1310.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20554.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Second

Notice of Proposed Rule Making

(Notice) in CC Docket No. 94–54, FCC

95–149, adopted April 5, 1995, and

released April 20, 1995.

The complete text of this Notice is

available for inspection and copying

during normal business hours in the

FCC Dockets Branch (Room 230), 1919

M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and

also may be purchased from the

Commission’s copy contractor,

International Transcription Service, Inc.

(ITS, Inc.), at (202) 857–3800, 1919 M

Street, N.W., Room 246, Washington,

D.C. 20554.

Synopsis of Notice

1. The Notice concludes that at

present it would be premature for the

Commission to propose or adopt rules of

general applicability requiring direct

interconnection arrangements between

CMRS providers. The Notice also finds

that present market conditions fail to

indicate that it is necessary to impose a

general CMRS-to-CMRS interconnection

obligation at this time. The Notice seeks

comment on several potential relevant

product and geographic market

definitions for purposes of analyzing the

interconnection obligations of CMRS

providers under Section 201(a) of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended (the Act). The Notice also

seeks comment on criteria to consider in

resolving interconnection disputes

under Sections 201(a), 208, and 332 of

the Act. Finally, the Notice seeks

additional comment on the question of

preemption of state-imposed

interconnection obligations.

2. The Notice makes similar

conclusions regarding the prematurity

of imposing the sort of general

interconnection obligations needed to

support roaming services. The Notice

seeks comment on several technical

issues related to the provision of

roaming service.

3. In addition, the Notice seeks

comment on whether Section 22.901 of

the Commission’s Rules, 47 CFR

§ 22.901 requires cellular carriers to

provide service to other CMRS roamers.

4. The Notice also tentatively

concludes that the existing obligation
20950 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 82 / Friday, April 28, 1995 / Proposed Rules

1See generally, Section 1.1206(a) of the

Commission’s Rules, 47 CFR § 1.1206(a).

requiring cellular providers not to

prohibit resale should be extended to

apply to most CMRS providers.

5. Additionally, the Notice tentatively

concludes that, as in the case of cellular

carriers, a time limitation on the

obligation to require resale of the

services of one facilities-based CMRS

provider to another facilities-based

CMRS provider is appropriate. The

Notice tentatively concludes that, as in

the case of cellular service, once the

newer entrant in a market is fully

operational the rationale for prohibiting

resale restrictions between facilitiesbased carriers, i.e., to offset any

competitive advantage gained as a result

of a service provider’s ‘‘headstart’’,

ceases to exist. The Notice seeks

comment on whether, as in the case of

cellular, the resale requirement should

remain in effect until the termination of

the fill-in period of the particular

service, which the Commission

previously established in its Rules, or

whether some other period is

appropriate.

6. Finally, the Notice tentatively

concludes that the Commission should

not impose a general obligation

requiring CMRS providers to

interconnect with resellers seeking to

install their own switching equipment

between the CMRS provider’s network

facilities and the facilities of the local

exchange carrier and the interexchange

carrier.

Ex Parte Rules

7. This is a non-restricted notice and

comment rule making proceeding. Ex

parte presentations are permitted,

except during the Sunshine Agenda

period, provided they are disclosed as

provided in the Commission’s Rules.1

Regulatory Flexibility Act

8. As required by Section 603 of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.

§ 601 et seq. (1981), the Commission has

prepared an Initial Regulatory

Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the

expected impact of the policies and

rules proposed in this Notice on small

entities. The IRFA is contained in

Appendix B to the Notice. The Secretary

shall cause a copy of this Notice,

including the IRFA, to be sent to the

Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small

Business Administration in accordance

with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

Authority

9. This action is taken pursuant to

Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201, 202, 208, 332,

and 403 Communications Act as

amended; 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 201, 202,

208, 332, and 403.

10. Accordingly, it is ordered that

notice is hereby given of the proposed

regulatory changes described above, and

that comment is sought on these

proposals.

11. It is further ordered that pursuant

to applicable procedures set forth in

Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the

Commission’s Rules, 47 CFR 1.415 and

1.419, comments shall be filed with

William F. Caton, Acting Secretary,

Federal Communications Commission,

Washington, DC 20554 on or before June

14, 1995, and reply comments shall be

filed with the Secretary on or before July

14, 1995. To file formally in this

proceeding, parties must file an original

and five copies of all comments, reply

comments, and supporting comments.

Parties wishing each Commissioner to

receive a personal copy of their

comments must file an original plus

nine copies.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10472 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95–48, RM–8590]

Television Broadcasting Services;

Weaverville, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: This document requests

comments on a petition for rule making

filed by Mark C. Allen, requesting the

allotment of UHF television Channel 32

to Weaverville, California, as that

community’s first local television

service. Weaverville is located within

the prohibited co-channel minimum

distance (174.5 miles) to the

Sacramento-Stockton television market,

one of the designated markets affected

by the Commission’s current freeze on

allotments and applications pending the

outcome of an inquiry into the use of

advanced television systems in

broadcasting. (See Order, Advanced

Television Systems and Their Impact on

Existing Television Broadcast Service,

52 Fed. Reg. 28346, July 29, 1987).

However, Channel 32 can be allotted to

Weaverville in compliance with the

terms of the freeze Order at a restricted

site. Coordinates used for Channel 32 at

Weaverville are 40–54–45 and 122–52–

15.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or

before June 15, 1995, and reply

comments on or before June 30, 1995.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications

Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554.

In addition to filing comments with the

FCC, interested parties should serve the

petitioner, as follows: Mark C. Allen,

3745 McHale Way, Redding, CA 96001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202)

418–2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of

Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No.

95–48, adopted April 14, 1995, and

released April 24, 1995. The full text of

this Commission decision is available

for inspection and copying during

normal business hours in the FCC’s

Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M

Street, NW, Washington, D.C. The

complete text of this decision may also

be purchased from the Commission’s

copy contractors, International

Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857–

3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140,

Washington, D.C. 20037.

Provisions of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply to

this proceeding.

Members of the public should note

that from the time a Notice of Proposed

Rule Making is issued until the matter

is no longer subject to Commission

consideration or court review, all ex

parte contacts are prohibited in

Commission proceedings, such as this

one, which involve channel allotments.

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules

governing permissible ex parte contacts.

For information regarding proper

filing procedures for comments, see 47

CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

Television broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules

Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 95–10470 Filed 4–27–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F