1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056) 

robert.mccauley@finnegan.com 

Jacob Schroeder (SBN 264717) 

jacob.schroeder@finegan.com 

Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665) 

jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com 

Arpita Bhattacharyya (SBN 316454) 

arpita.bhattacharyya@finnegan.com 

James S. Miller (SBN 317363) 

james.miller@finnegan.com 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

3300 Hillview Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 

Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

ASETEK DANMARK A/S 

Hubert H. Kuo (SBN 204036) 

hkuo@ardentlawgroup.com 

Jeffrey T. Gwynn (SBN 180548) 

jgwynn@ardentlawgroup.com 

ARDENT LAW GROUP, P.C. 

4340 Von Karman Ave., Suite 290 

Newport Beach, CA 92660 

Telephone: (949) 299-0188 

Facsimile: (949) 299-0127 

William L. Buus (SBN 180059) 

wbuus@schifferbuus.com 

SCHIFFER & BUUS, APC 

959 South Coast Drive, Suite 385 

Costa Mesa, CA 92626 

Telephone: (949) 825-6140 

Facsimile: (949) 825-6141 

Wei Lin Chen (SBN 225611) 

williamchen@zoomlaw.com.tw 

ZOOMLAW ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW 

5F-4, No. 171 Songge Rd. Xinyi Dist., 

Taipei City 11085, Taiwan (R.O.C) 

Telephone: (949) 825-6140 

Facsimile: (949) 825-6141 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD., 

Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendant, 

v. 

ASETEK DANMARK A/S 

Defendant and 

Counterclaimant. 

 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-07160-JST 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ENTRY OF 

FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT 

Complaint Filed: September 30, 2014 

Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 STIPULATION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST

Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. (“AVC”) and Defendant 

and Counterclaimant Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) have agreed on a confidential binding term 

sheet (the “Agreement”) to fully resolve this case, and as a condition of the Agreement Asetek and 

AVC (the “Parties”) jointly stipulate to the following: 

1. The Proposed Final Consent Judgment in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A be 

entered by the Court; 

2. Without admitting to liability but to resolve this action and to preserve resources, AVC 

agrees to pay Asetek the amount specified in the Agreement; 

3. Asetek will not sue AVC and/or AVC’s Customers (defined in the Agreement), officers, 

directors, agents, servants, representatives, attorneys, employees, subsidiaries and Affiliates for 

infringement of United States Patent Nos. 8,240,362 and 8,245,764 based on the Accused Products 

in this action (defined in the Agreement and Proposed Final Consent Judgment) shipped to AVC’s 

Customers before the Effective Date of the Agreement; 

4. AVC may not and will not assert invalidity (by claim, counterclaim, or otherwise) or in 

any way challenge or contest the validity or patentability of any claim of any Asetek AIO Patent 

(defined in the Agreement) in any proceeding in any court or tribunal in any country, or in the 

United States Patent Office (including the Patent Trial and Appeal Board) or in any patent office or 

patent tribunal in any country, and AVC will terminate, withdraw, and/or dismiss any and all 

existing challenges to any and all Asetek AIO Patents or claims anywhere in the world within fifteen 

(15) days after the Effective Date; 

5. AVC will not accuse Asetek’s existing or future AIO Devices (defined in the Agreement) 

of infringing any patents or utility models issued anywhere in the world that are owned by or 

assigned to AVC, nor will AVC file any lawsuits or claims alleging such infringement. AVC will 

terminate, withdraw and/or dismiss any infringement allegations, lawsuits, or claims against Asetek 

AIO Devices (if any), within fifteen (15) days of the Effective Date of the Agreement; 

6. The Parties shall each bear their own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses; 

7. The Court retains jurisdiction over the Parties and to enforce the terms of the Agreement 

and the stipulated Final Consent Judgment; and 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 STIPULATION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST

8. All remaining issues, claims, defenses, and counterclaims in this action are dismissed 

with prejudice. 

Dated: April 17, 2019 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

By: /s/ Arpita Bhattacharyya 

Arpita Bhattacharyya 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

ASETEK DANMARK A/S 

Dated: April 17, 2019 SCHIFFER & BUUS, APC 

By: /s/ William L. Buus 

William L. Buus 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 

ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD. 

ATTESTATION 

Counsel for Asetek hereby attests by her signature below that concurrence in the signing and 

filing of this document was obtained from counsel for AVC. 

Dated: April 17, 2019 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

 GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

By: /s/ Arpita Bhattacharyya 

Arpita Bhattacharyya 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

ASETEK DANMARK A/S 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 STIPULATION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court, having considered the Stipulation of Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Asia Vital 

Components Co., Ltd. (“AVC”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant Asetek Danmark A/S 

(“Asetek”) (together the “Parties”) for entry of Final Consent Judgment, and FOR GOOD CAUSE 

SHOWN, HEREBY ORDERS THAT THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION IS GRANTED AND AS 

FOLLOWS: 

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the Parties and the subject matter of this action; 

2. In accordance with the Stipulation, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to enter the 

Final Consent Judgment (Exhibit A to the Stipulation) after it is signed by the Court; 

3. The Final Consent Judgment is binding upon the Parties, their agents, and others acting in 

concert with them or legally identified with them; 

4. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order, the stipulated Final Consent 

Judgment, and the Agreement between the Parties. 

Dated: ____________________ _____________________________ 

Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Judge 

Northern District of California 

April 17, 2019