alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Henry

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4326

___________

Frank Watts, II, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

U.S. Postal Service; Pulaski County * District Court for the

Regional Detention Facility, Postal * Eastern District of Arkansas

Service; Arkansas Department of *

Correction, Postal Service; U.S. * [UNPUBLISHED]

District Court, Clerk's Office, *

Eastern District of Arkansas, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 7, 2000

 Filed: March 28, 2000

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD

ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frank Watts, II, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the final judgment entered in

the District Court1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas dismissing before service of
L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

-2-

process his civil rights action against the United States Postal Service, the Clerk’s

Office of the Eastern District of Arkansas, a county jail, the administration of the

Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC), and the post office and administration of

one of ADC’s units. Watts asserted claims for retaliation, denial of access to the

courts, and conspiracy, all arising out of the handling of his legal mail. He sought $200

million in damages. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the

district court.

Specifically, we conclude Watts’s suit fails because, among other reasons, the

named defendants are not liable, on the basis alleged, under either 42 U.S.C. § 1983

or Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See Monell v.

Department of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691, 694 (1978) (municipalities cannot be

held liable under § 1983 on respondeat superior theory unless injury was inflicted

pursuant to execution of municipal policy or custom); Buford v. Runyon, 160 F.3d

1199, 1203 n.7 (8th Cir. 1998) (Bivens action cannot be premised on respondeat

superior liability; defendants are liable for their personal acts only). Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 584 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 584

   Congratulating Miss Emma Broyles of Alaska for being crowned Miss 
                             America 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2022

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Sullivan) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Congratulating Miss Emma Broyles of Alaska for being crowned Miss 
                             America 2022.

Whereas Emma Broyles was born and raised in Anchorage, Alaska, and graduated 
        from Service High School in 2019;
Whereas Miss Broyles, an honors student and a biomedical sciences major at 
        Arizona State University, plans to attend medical school and become a 
        dermatologist;
Whereas Miss Broyles, who has excelled at a wide range of musical activities 
        from an early age, is pursuing a minor in voice performance;
Whereas Miss Broyles applied her exceptional talents in the Miss Alaska 2021 
        competition;
Whereas Miss Broyles was crowned Miss Alaska on June 17, 2021;
Whereas Miss Broyles, as Miss Alaska, participated in the 100th Anniversary Miss 
        America Competition (referred to in this preamble as the 
        ``Competition'') alongside 50 outstanding young women from across the 
        country;
Whereas Miss Broyles was inspired by her older brother to choose ``Building 
        Community through the Special Olympics'' as the theme of her social 
        impact initiative;
Whereas, during the talent segment of the Competition, Miss Broyles sang ``Let 
        Me Be Your Star'' from the television show ``Smash'';
Whereas, throughout the Competition, Miss Broyles spoke openly and courageously 
        about her struggles with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 
        dermatillomania;
Whereas Miss Broyles was crowned Miss America 2022 on December 16, 2021;
Whereas Miss Broyles is the first Alaskan to be crowned Miss America in the 100-
        year history of the Competition;
Whereas Miss Broyles is the first Korean-American to be crowned Miss America; 
        and
Whereas Alaskans take great pride in Miss Broyles' victory: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates Miss Emma Broyles of Alaska for being 
        crowned Miss America 2022;
            (2) celebrates historic achievement of Miss Broyles as the 
        first Alaskan and first Korean-American to be crowned Miss 
        America; and
            (3) commends Miss Broyles for inspiring young people and 
        serving as a positive role model for millions of individuals in 
        the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Rosa H. VALDES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1775

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed. Denied.
EX PARTE Ronald D. VETETO

(In re: Ronald D. Veteto v. Jeff Dunn et al.)

2170320

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 1, 2018

Reh. denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1708

In re: TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:13-cv-00386-FDW)

Submitted: February 5, 2021 Decided: March 4, 2021

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance L. James-Bey, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrance L. James-Bey petitions for a writ of mandamus, asking this court to order 

the district court to take certain actions in his closed civil case. “[M]andamus is a drastic 

remedy that must be reserved for extraordinary situations.” In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 

907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). “Courts 

provide mandamus relief only when (1) petitioner ‘ha[s] no other adequate means to attain 

the relief [he] desires’; (2) petitioner has shown a ‘clear and indisputable’ right to the 

requested relief; and (3) the court deems the writ ‘appropriate under the circumstances.’” 

Id. (quoting Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380-81 (2004)); see also In re 

Moore, 955 F.3d 384, 388 (4th Cir. 2020). The writ of mandamus is not a substitute for 

appeal after final judgment. Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 97 (1967); In re Lockheed 

Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). We have reviewed the district court’s 

docket and conclude that James-Bey fails to show that he is entitled to the requested relief. 

Accordingly, we deny his petition and supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Executive Officer,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey
      Markin ,
      as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Jeffrey Markin


Jeffrey
      Markin


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


September
       25, 2006





This
      Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 436 

Honoring the individuals fighting and the individuals who have fallen 

responding to wildland fires during the ongoing 2021 wildfire season. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2021 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Mr. PADILLA, and Mr. 

HEINRICH) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the individuals fighting and the individuals who 

have fallen responding to wildland fires during the ongoing 2021 wildfire season. 

Whereas more than 5,000,000 acres have burned in wildfire 

in 2021; 

Whereas changing climates, resulting in long-term trends of 

warmer and drier weather, and mismanagement of the 

forests of the United States are exacerbating the threat 

of wildfires and contributing to the greater than normal 

fire activity in Western States, resulting in dangerous 

conditions for wildland firefighters; 

Whereas more than 16,000 personnel have been assigned to 

contain and combat the fires that threaten the West; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 436 ATS 

Whereas the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic has exacerbated the public health and public safety 

risks inherent in combating wildfires; 

Whereas Federal job classification and pay levels for wildland 

firefighters were established more than 30 years ago and 

should be re-evaluated based on the current wildfire risk 

and job market; and 

Whereas wildland firefighters, first responders, sheriffs, and 

community leaders have acted bravely and risked their 

lives to contain dangerous wildfires across the United 

States to protect families and critical infrastructure: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the efforts and sacrifices of the 

3 wildland firefighters who have risked their lives to 

4 fight intense wildfires in 2021; 

5 (2) honors the bravery and heroism of the men 

6 and women assisting in responding to and combating 

7 wildfires; 

8 (3) expresses appreciation and gratitude to fire9 fighters for protecting lives and property in the 

10 United States during the ongoing 2021 wildfire sea11 son; 

12 (4) expresses full support for communities 

13 throughout the West as those communities focus on 

14 recovery and rebuilding areas and communities af15 fected by wildfires; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 436 ATS 

1 (5) extends gratitude and appreciation to the 

2 families and loved ones of wildland firefighters for 

3 their important role in supporting the wildland fire4 fighter community. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                       1,464,093
<SECURITIES>                                 1,668,768
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,531,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    557,589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,344,078
<PP&E>                                       3,436,943
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,542,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,501,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,843,826
<BONDS>                                      2,134,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,523,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,501,767
<SALES>                                      9,093,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,704,168
<CGS>                                        4,119,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,144,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,081,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,693,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                   559,929
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,133,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,133,682
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67


</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1


                          COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Years Ended December 31,

                                                      2000          1999           1998
<S>                                                <C>           <C>            <C>
Earnings (loss) before fixed charges (1):

     Income (loss) before extraordinary items
          and cumulative effect of accounting
          changes                                   $113.1       ($247.5)        ($97.2)

     Minority interest                                            (107.9)         (17.0)

     Income tax expense (benefit)                    299.9         (46.2)         (35.8)

     Fixed charges                                   524.8         362.9          275.7
                                                    ------        ------         ------

                                                    $937.8        ($38.7)        $125.7
                                                    ======        ======         ======

Fixed charges (1):

     Interest expense                               $515.7         352.9         $223.6

     Interest expense on notes payable
          to affiliates                                9.1          10.0           52.1
                                                    ------        ------         ------

                                                    $524.8        $362.9         $275.7
                                                    ======        ======         ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (2)                1.79            --             --

<FN>
_______________________

(1)  For the purpose of  calculating  the ratio of  earnings  to fixed  charges,
     earnings  (loss)  consist of earnings  (loss) before  extraordinary  items,
     cumulative  effect of accounting  changes,  minority  interest,  income tax
     expense  (benefit),  and fixed charges.  Fixed charges  consist of interest
     expense and interest expense on notes payable to affiliates.

(2)  For the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, earnings, as defined above,
     were  inadequate  to cover  fixed  charges  by $401.6  million  and  $150.0
     million, respectively.
</FN>
</TABLE>
5. Section 5 of the Agreement (“Stock Plans”) is amended to add the following:Executive shall additionally be granted an award of sixty thousand (60,000)restricted shares of ARC’s common stock, subject to the terms and conditions ofARC’s customary form of Restricted Stock Option Agreement, with one hundredpercent (100%) of the restricted shares vesting on the fourth anniversary ofthe date of grant, provided that one hundred percent (100%) of the restricted shares shall immediately become vested prior to such fourth anniversary in theevent of: (a) Executive’s death, (b) Executive becoming Permanently Disabled,(c) termination of the Agreement by ARC without Cause, or (d) termination ofthe Agreement by Executive with Good Reason.6. Section 11(c)(i) of the Agreement (“Termination by ARC without Cause; Termination byExecutive with Good Reason”) is amended to replace “nine (9) months” with “twelve (12) months.”7. In all other respects the Agreement remains in full force and effect without modification.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreementas of the date first hereinabove set forth.      AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,144
<INVENTORY>                                      1,953
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,438
<PP&E>                                          37,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,596
<BONDS>                                         25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,695)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,008
<SALES>                                         21,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,056
<CGS>                                            5,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (266)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,053
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
Filed 10/16/07 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2007 ND 150

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Peter John Grzeskowiak, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20060354 & 20060355

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Joel D. Medd, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mark Jason McCarthy, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, ND 58206-5607, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.

Peter John Grzeskowiak, pro se, 15750 County Road 15, Minto, ND 58261, defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. Grzeskowiak

Nos. 20060354 & 20060355

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Peter Grzeskowiak appeals from orders deferring imposition of sentence entered upon his conditional guilty pleas to charges of unlawful display of license plates and failure to transfer title of his vehicle.  He argues he was not sufficiently served with a complaint and he was improperly denied his right to counsel, denied his request for a preliminary examination, denied his demand for change of judge, and denied his right to a speedy trial.

[¶2]The district court’s orders are affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-1145V

Filed: April 27, 2015

Not for Publication

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

CANDACE JOHNSON *

*

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Tetanus Diphtheria Acellular Pertussis

v. * (“Tdap”); Shoulder Injury Related to 

* Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”); 

* Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Paul R. Brazil, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner.

Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On November 24, 2014, Candace Johnson filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq,

2 [the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that as a result of a Tetanus 

diphtheria and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on February 25, 2014, petitioner

suffered a “shoulder injury related to vaccine administration.” Petition at 1. The case 

was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 27, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Respondent’s Report”], 

in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, it will be 

posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).

 
Respondent’s Report at 3. Specifically, respondent submits that “Ms. Johnson suffered 

a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration, a non-Table injury, and that 

preponderance of the medical evidence indicates that the injury was causally related to 

the vaccination. Therefore, compensation is appropriate.” Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master