alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60959

Summary Calendar

SYFUL MILON,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A094 937 651

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Syful Milon, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen removal

proceedings and for reconsideration.

Milon does not challenge the BIA’s decision insofar as it denied his motion

for reconsideration. Therefore, he has abandoned any issues related to that

denial. See, e.g., Zhu v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 588, 593 n.10 (5th Cir. 2007).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 14, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60959 Document: 00511632706 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/14/2011
No. 10-60959

Milon contends the affidavit submitted with his motion satisfied the

requirements for reopening based on ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC). 

Motions to reopen removal proceedings are disfavored, and the moving party

bears a heavy burden. Altamirano-Lopez v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 547, 549 (5th Cir.

2006) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). In reviewing the BIA’s

denial of a motion to reopen, this court generally applies a “highly deferential

abuse-of-discretion standard” and will affirm the BIA’s decision “so long as it is

not capricious, racially invidious, utterly without foundation in the evidence, or

otherwise so irrational that it is arbitrary rather than the result of any

perceptible rational approach”. Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 303-04 (5th Cir.

2005) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

IAC can warrant reopening removal proceedings if petitioner satisfies the

requirements set forth in Matter of Lozada, 19 I&N Dec. 637 (BIA 1988). To

support an IAC claim, an alien must: (1) provide an affidavit attesting the

relevant facts, including the terms of the attorney-client agreement; (2) before

he presents the claim to the BIA, inform counsel of the allegations and allow

counsel an opportunity to respond; and (3) file or explain why a grievance has

not been filed against counsel. Lara v. Trominski, 216 F.3d 487, 496 (5th Cir.

2000); Lozada, 19 I&N Dec. at 639. “Where essential information is lacking, it

is impossible to evaluate the substance of [an IAC] claim.” Lozada, 19 I&N Dec.

at 639.

Milon did not, at any point in this proceeding, provide the BIA proof of his

letter to former counsel or a filed grievance. “[T]he general application of the

Lozada rules is not an abuse of discretion”. Lara, 216 F.3d at 498.

DENIED.

2

Case: 10-60959 Document: 00511632706 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/14/2011
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017292EN.01011901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 292/119 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1018 of 29 June 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on markets in financial instruments with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying information to be notified by investment firms, market operators and credit institutions

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 155 of 17 June 2017](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2017_155_R_TOC)
)

On page 3, Article 5(b):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | a short description of the appropriate arrangements to be in place and the date from which these arrangements will be provided in the host Member State;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | a short description of the arrangements and the date from which those arrangements will be provided in the host Member State;’. |

---
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Du Song, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xinyinhai Technology, Ltd.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: November 7, 2007 /s/ Du Song Du Song, Chief Financial Officer
Khalil Flozel TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1768

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Glenn R. Rink, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1
to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Abtech Holdings, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Dated: April 30, 2018 | /s/ Glenn R. Rink                                                                     
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Glenn R. Rink                                                                         
|                      | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
        (Principal Executive Officer)
# L_2017304EN.01002001.xml

| 21.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 304/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 304/20

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/2156

of 7 November 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Kiełbasa piaszczańska’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland's application to register the name ‘Kiełbasa piaszczańska’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland's application to register the name ‘Kiełbasa piaszczańska’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kiełbasa piaszczańska’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kiełbasa piaszczańska’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Kiełbasa piaszczańska’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 205, 29.6.2017, p. 70.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO.,

LIMITED, Successor-ininterest to ST. PAUL

REINSURANCE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.,

THE FORT MILLER CO. and

BEECHE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C05-1912 BZ

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER

The trial scheduled to begin February 23, 2009 is a

bench trial limited to Unionamerica’s claims and Fort

Miller’s answer and affirmative defenses to those claims. 

The issues presented by Fort Miller’s counterclaim have been

severed for trial and their prosecution STAYED pending a

ruling on the rescission claim. See Order Staying

Counterclaim dated October 30, 2008. Notwithstanding this

Order and the Stipulation and Order permitting Unionamerica

to withdraw its jury trial demand dated October 6, 2008,

pretrial documents in apparent violation of these Orders have

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 277 Filed 01/14/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

been filed. See, for example, document 258, Fort Miller’s

proposed jury instructions. 

The Court intends to abide by its October 30, 2008 Order

and only consider at the pretrial conference issues that

pertain to the February 23, 2009 bench trial on the

rescission claim. The parties are therefore ORDERED to

review their pretrial filings and withdraw all filings that

are not consistent with the October 30, 2008 Order by 

4:00 p.m. tomorrow, January 15, 2009, so that the Court will

not waste its time reviewing unnecessary filings. 

Unionamerica has delivered to chambers 8 boxes marked

“Plaintiff’s Exhibits” as well as 8 boxes marked “Plaintiff’s

Exhibits” to my deputy clerk. The exhibits are in 6" binders

which are too heavy for the Court and staff to lift. 

Unionamerica was previously advised of this when it submitted

similar binders in connection with its summary judgment

motion. Unionamerica is ORDERED to replace the existing

binders by 4:00 p.m. on January 16, 2009. The new binders

shall be no more than 3" thick. 

Dated: January 14, 2009

 

 Bernard Zimmerman

 United States Magistrate Judge

g:\bzall\-bzcases\Unionamerica v. Fort Miller\pretrial\pretrial order re filings.wpd

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 277 Filed 01/14/09 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MITCHELL WAYNE SCHAEFER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-98-76-F)

Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 30, 2003

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Edwin C. Walker,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes,

Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mitchell Wayne Schaefer appeals from the judgment order of the

district court revoking his term of supervised release and

sentencing him to twenty-four months imprisonment. Schaefer claims

that the district court’s order is plainly unreasonable because the

sentencing range of the guidelines was eight to fourteen months. 

This court has previously held that the policy statements of

Chapter Seven of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual are not

binding on the courts. See United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638,

640 (4th Cir. 1995). Schaefer’s five separate and unrelated

violations of the terms of his supervised release provide ample

support for the action of the district court, and Schaefer’s

sentence is statutorily supported. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3)

(2000). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen T. McGowan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sun Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 26, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sun Microsystems, Inc.



By:

/s/ Stephen T. McGowanName:

Stephen T. McGowanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
f8k011908ex10vi_mmg.htm


     

     

    Exhibit
10.6

    
 

    CONVERSION
AGREEMENT

    


    This
Conversion Agreement
(the “Agreement”), dated as
of January 19, 2009, is made and entered into by and between Mega Media Group,
Inc. (the “Company”), and Steven
Fruman. (the “Holder”).

    


    RECITALS

    


    WHEREAS, the Holder holds a 9%
promissory note with an outstanding principal amount of $120,000.00 and interest
amount of $4,500.00 (the “Note”), dated May 12,
2008 and August 29, 2008 for a total of $124,500.00 which has been assumed by
the Company; and

    


    WHEREAS, the Holder has agreed
to convert the Note, including accrued interest thereon, into shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), on
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, intending to
be legally bound, the parties hereby agree as follows:

    


    
      	
              1.  

            	
              Conversion. The Holder
      shall convert the outstanding principal due under the Note, together with
      any interest accrued thereon through the date of conversion, into shares
      of the Company's Common Stock, at the rate of $0.01 per share (the “Conversion”)
      for a total of 12,450,000,000 shares. The Conversion shall be considered
      payment in full by the Company of the Note and the conversion method in
      the Note shall be waived. The Holder shall deliver the Note to the Company
      for cancellation.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.  

            	
              Binding Effect. This
      instrument is being executed by the Holder and shall be binding upon its
      successors and assigns for the uses and purposes above set forth and
      referred to, and shall be effective as of the date
  hereof.

            


    

    


    
      	
              3.  

            	
              Governing Law. This
      instrument shall be governed by and enforced in accordance with the laws
      of the State of New York without any application of the principles of
      conflicts of laws.

            


    

    


    


    


    


    


    
      
        
        

      

      
        -1-

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

    


    

 

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Agreement has been duly executed by the Company and Holder as of the date first
above written.

    


    MEGA
MEDIA GROUP, INC.

    


    


    /s/ Alex
Shvarts                             
     
             


                                                                                        Alex
Shvarts, CEO

    


    THE
HOLDER

    


    
 

    /s/
Steven
Fruman                                     

    Steven
Fruman

     

     

     

     

     

    -2-
# C_2018325EN.01002001.xml

| 14.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/20

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision of 16 July 2018 renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 253 of 19 July 2018
  )

(2018/C 325/12)

On page 9, in Article 1 I, in the table ‘GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES’:

for:

| ‘Belgium (rota system) | Flemish Community: Ms Nathalie VERSTRAETE
  French Community: Mr Guibert DEBROUX’, |
| --- | --- |

‘Belgium (rota system)

Flemish Community: Ms Nathalie VERSTRAETE

French Community: Mr Guibert DEBROUX’,

read:

read:

| ‘Belgium (rota system) | Flemish Community: Ms Natalie VERSTRAETE
  French Community: Mr Guibert DEBROUX’. |
| --- | --- |

‘Belgium (rota system)

Flemish Community: Ms Natalie VERSTRAETE

French Community: Mr Guibert DEBROUX’.

On page 9, in Article 1 I, in the table ‘GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES’:

for:

for:

| ‘Ireland | Ms Selen GUERIN’, |
| --- | --- |

‘Ireland

Ms Selen GUERIN’,

read:

read:

| ‘Ireland | Mr John McGRATH until 30.11.2018 and
  Ms Selen GUERIN from 1.12.2018’. |
| --- | --- |

‘Ireland

Mr John McGRATH until 30.11.2018 and

Ms Selen GUERIN from 1.12.2018’.

On page 10, in Article 1 II, in the table ‘REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS’:

The following row is inserted between the entries for Latvia and Luxembourg:

| ‘Lithuania | Ms Tatjana BABRAUSKIENĖ’. |
| --- | --- |

‘Lithuania

Ms Tatjana BABRAUSKIENĖ’.

On page 11, in Article 1 III, in the table ‘REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS’:

The following row is inserted between the entries for Malta and Austria:

| ‘Netherlands | Ms Gertrud van ERP’, |
| --- | --- |

‘Netherlands

Ms Gertrud van ERP’,

On page 11, in Article 1 III, in the table ‘REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS’:

for:

for:

| ‘Romania | Mr Julian GROPOSILA’, |
| --- | --- |

‘Romania

Mr Julian GROPOSILA’,

read:

read:

| ‘Romania | Mr Iulian GROPOȘILĂ’. |
| --- | --- |

‘Romania

Mr Iulian GROPOȘILĂ’.

---
1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 Date: March 2, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Mark J. OBrienMark J. OBrienChief Executive OfficerDate: March 2, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Kimberly PerezKimberly PerezChief Financial Officer
Jennifer M. ROMERO, Appellant, v. WALMART STORES, INC., a Foreign Profit Corporation, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4790

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Archie JOHNSON v. Dr. Bai Raj BHANDARI

NO. 2019-C-0658

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2018268EN.01009202.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 268/92 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2018/1290 of 24 September 2018 implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 240 of 25 September 2018](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2018_240_R_TOC)
)

On page 65, Annex, point (4):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘24. | Name: 1: MUS'AB 2: MUSTAFA 3: ABU AL QUASSIM 4: OMAR’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘24. | Name: 1: MUS'AB 2: MUSTAFA 3: ABU AL QASSIM 4: OMAR’. |

---