alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carl
Ritter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



| | /s/
      Carl Ritter        
| | -----------------------------
| | Carl Ritter                  
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (principal executive officer)
| | December 15, 2009            

---
Case 4:17-cv-00486 Document 3 Filed 01/27/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:17-cv-00486 Document 3 Filed 01/27/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
4.18




[Translation
of Chinese Original]




Termination
Agreement of Share Pledge




This
Termination Agreement of Equity Pledge (hereinafter referred to as “this
Agreement”) is executed in Beijing, the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter
referred to as “China”) on November 24th, 2008, by and between:




Pledgee:
Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd.




Registered
Address: Room 406, Building B, 5-2, Jing-Meng Hi-Tech Mansion, Shangdi East
Road, Haidian District, Beijing




Pledger:
Novel-Tongfang Information Engineering Co., Ltd.




Registered
Address: 1st Floor,
Building A, Incubation Center, Shishan Software Scientific and Technological
Park, Nanhai, Foshan




In
consideration of that the Pledgee and the Pledger have executed the Share Pledge
Agreement (Attachment 1) on September 1, 2005, the Parties intend to terminate
the same;




NOW
THEREFORE, the parties through friendly consultation agree as
below:




1.
            The
      Parties agree to terminate the Share Pledge Agreement (Attachment 1)
      executed on September 1, 2005, by and between the Pledgee and the
      Pledger.




2.
            This
      Agreement shall be effective upon the signatures or seals of the
      Parties.




3.
            This
      Agreement is written in Chinese in duplicate, with each party holding one
      copy.




Pledgee:
Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd.


(Seal)


Signature:/s/ Jianhua
Zhu




Pledger:
Novel-Tongfang Information Engineering Co., Ltd.


(Seal)


Signature:/s/ Wangzhi
Chen




1




Attachment
1:  Share Pledge Agreement (omitted)




2
Deshawn M. JONES, DOC #H50861, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1392, 2D18-1461 CONSOLIDATED

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT XI

                            U.S.B. HOLDING CO., INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                   THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
                   ------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    2003        2002
                                                               -------------------------
                                                               (000's, except share data)
NUMERATOR:
<S>                                                            <C>           <C>
  Net income for basic and diluted earnings per common share
   -- net income available to common stockholders              $     7,620   $     6,009
                                                               -------------------------
DENOMINATOR:
  Denominator for basic earnings per common share -
    weighted average shares                                     18,595,539    18,351,870
  Effects of dilutive securities:
    Director and employee stock options                            419,383       516,495
                                                               -------------------------
  Total effects of dilutive securities                             419,383       516,495
                                                               -------------------------
 Denominator for diluted earnings per common share -
   adjusted weighted average shares                             19,014,922    18,868,365
                                                               =========================

Basic earnings per common share                                $      0.41   $      0.33
                                                               =========================
Diluted earnings per common share                              $      0.40   $      0.32
                                                               =========================
</TABLE>
Derrick Michael STANBERRY v. STATE

CR-17-0105

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018 Reh. denied March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. CR 17-0028 JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEPHANIE M. HINDS (CABN 154284) 

Acting United States Attorney

HALLIE HOFFMAN (CABN 210020)

Chief, Criminal Division

ROBERT DAVID REES (CABN 229441) 

KRISTINA GREEN (NYBN 5226204) 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: (510) 637-3680 

FAX: (510) 637-3724 

Email: robert.rees@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JEHOADDAN WILSON,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR 17-0028 JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PETITION 

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD 

TESTIFICANDUM

Upon motion of the United States of America, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the request of the United States for issuance of the Writ of Habeas Corpus 

Ad Testificandum requiring the production of witness JUNIUS WINTERS, before this Court on the date 

stated in the Writ submitted, and requiring that the witness be present for all days of trial thereafter until 

his testimony can be given in full, is granted,, and the Writ shall be issued as presented. 

DATED: ___________________ __________________________________ 

Hon. Judge Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Judge

July 15, 2021

FILED 

SUSANY. SOONG 

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND Jul 15 2021
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

CASE NO. CR 17-0028 JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

TO: DONALD M. O’KEEFE, United States Marshal for the Northern District of California and 

Calipatria State Prison, 7018 Blair Road, Calipatria, California, and/or any of his authorized 

deputies: 

Pursuant to the foregoing petition and order, you are directed to produce the body of JUNIUS 

WINTERS, CDCR #AP8426, who is in the custody of Calipatria State Prison before the Honorable

Judge Jon S. Tigar, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, located at the 

Oakland Federal Courthouse, located at 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612, on September 13, 

2021, at 8:30 a.m. for testimony in the trial against the defendant in the above-entitled case and further 

to produce said witness at all future days of that trial as necessary until his testimony can be given in 

full. 

DATED: ______________________ CLERK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

By: __________________________________ 

DEPUTY CLERK

07/15/2021

Jessie Mosley
Exhibit 65

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-66 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1944\order re extension.wpd

U

nite

d

States District C

o

u

rt

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PING FANG,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 K/P CORPORATION,

Defendant.

 /

No. C 05-01944 CRB

ORDER

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to respond to Magistrate Judge James

Larson’s Report and Recommendation of January 24, 2006, and also to continue looking for

an attorney who speaks Mandarin. This is now plaintiff’s third request for an extension of

time. The Court hereby GRANTS plaintiff’s request and ORDERS plaintiff to file any

objections to the Report and Recommendation by May 1, 2006. This is the last extension of

time plaintiff will receive.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 13, 2006

 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-01944-CRB Document 11 Filed 02/13/06 Page 1 of 1
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 400 

Designating September 2021 as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. REED, Mrs. 

CAPITO, Mr. CASEY, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. HAWLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

OCTOBER 7, 2021 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2021 as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas each year more than 15,500 children under the age 

of 19 in the United States are diagnosed with cancer; 

Whereas every year more than 1,700 children in the United 

States lose their lives to cancer; 

Whereas childhood cancer is the leading cause of death from 

disease and the second overall leading cause of death for 

children in the United States; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for children with cancer has 

increased from 58 percent in the mid-1970s to 84 perVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:14 Oct 08, 2021 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR400.ATS SR400

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 400 ATS 

cent in 2020, representing significant improvement from 

previous decades; 

Whereas more than 2⁄3 of children who survive cancer will develop at least 1 chronic health condition, and many survivors will face a late-effect from treatment that could be 

considered severe or life-threatening; 

Whereas cancer patients face a higher risk of contracting the 

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19) due to weakened 

immune systems; and 

Whereas cancer occurs regularly and randomly and spares no 

racial or ethnic group, socioeconomic class, or geographic 

region: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2021 as ‘‘National 

3 Childhood Cancer Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) requests that the Federal Government, 

5 States, localities, and nonprofit organizations ob6 serve the month with appropriate programs and ac7 tivities, with the goal of increasing public knowledge 

8 of the risks of cancer; 

9 (3) encourages survivors of childhood cancer to 

10 continue to receive ongoing monitoring and physical 

11 and psychosocial care throughout their adult lives; 

12 (4) recognizes the human toll of cancer and 

13 pledges to make the prevention and cure of cancer 

14 a public health priority; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 400 ATS 

1 (5) reminds the people of the United States 

2 that these children are the definition of bravery, and 

3 commends and honors their courage. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00529-CV

Isabel MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

Ana LITOFSKY and Michael Litofsky,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV05367

Honorable John Francis Davis, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 23, 2019

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by September 4, 2019. Because the brief was not 

timely filed, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing by September 30, 2019, why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant did 

not respond to this court’s order. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See id.

PER CURIAM
Randolph II PRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3956

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER
Appellate case name: San Jacinto River Authority v. Michael A. Burney , et al. Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00365

- CV Trial court case number: 2018

- 10744 Trial court: 157th District Cour t of Harris County

Appellate case name: San Jacinto River Authority v. Charles J. Argento, et al. Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00406

- CV Trial court case number: 2018

- 10787 Trial court: 151st District Court of Harris County

Appellate case name: San Jacint o River Authority v. Vicente Medina, et al. Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00407

- CV Trial court case number: 2018

- 10478 Trial court: 151st District Court of Harris County

In these three appeals, a ppellant has asserted in its first issue that the district co urts lacked subject

- matter jurisdiction over the a ppellees’ inverse

- condemnation claims because 

### , under Government Code subsection 25.1032(c), the county civil courts at law of Harris County have exclusive subject

- matter jurisdiction over inverse

- condemnati on claims

. Appellees have also pleaded statutory

- takings claims under Government Code sub section 2 007.021(a), which provides in pertinent part: “ A suit under this subchapter must be filed in a district court in the county in which the private real propert y owner's affected property is located. ”

T he court requests supplemental briefs from the parties on a ppellant’s first issue. The supplemental brief

s should address, at a minimum, sub section 2 007.021(a), this court’s decision in City of Houston v. Guthrie
, 332 S.W.3d 578, 592

– 93 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied), and the effect, if any, of subsection 25.1032(c) on the subject

- matter jurisdiction of

a ppellees’ statutory

- takings claims under sub section 2 007.021(a). The supplemental briefs shal l be filed no later than 1:30 p.m. on October 12, 2018.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 5, 2018
EXHIBIT 15




TXU Electric Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Electric Company and
subsidiaries (TXU Electric) for the periods ended September 30, 2000 and 1999,
as indicated in our report dated November 10, 2000; because we did not perform
an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU
Electric's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2000, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-69554 and
333-42985 on Form S-3, and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 33-83976 on Form S-3, of TXU Electric.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 13, 2000
Case 3:05-cv-01874-JSW Document 16 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:05-cv-01874-JSW Document 16 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DOMINIQUE BARTEET
, Appellant,

v.

GEORGE J. JANSSEN
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2971

[ August 3, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Robert G. Panse , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CA

005039

- XXXX

- MB

.

Chance McClain of Law Offices of Chance McClain, Lake Park, for appellant.

Michael P. Hamaway and Jason Ari Smith of Mombach, Boyle, Hardin & Simmons, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C U RIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., L EVINE and C ONNER

, JJ., concur. * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARKISE CROSBY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 129 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of August, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAN FRANCISCO REGIONAL CENTER 

LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00223-RS 

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND 

REQUESTING BRIEFING

The Receiver has filed a motion seeking an order authorizing final distributions and 

termination of the Receivership and this action. The Receiver represents that the Securities and 

Exchange Commission does not oppose the motion. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the 

motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearing set for August 10, 2023, 

is vacated. Although it is unlikely that any other person has legal standing to object, the court will 

delay issuing a ruling on the motion until the originally calendared hearing date.

The Receiver is currently aware of six investors for whom she has been unable to obtain 

necessary address information to permit final distributions. The Receiver proposes redistributing 

the amounts those investors would otherwise receive among all other holders of Class 3 Claims. 

The Receiver also anticipates that at least some other distributions will go unclaimed. She 

proposes, therefore, that any unclaimed funds that cannot feasibly be redistributed be sent to the 

SEC, for payment into the United States Treasury.

No later than August 3, 2023, the Receiver shall file a brief addressing whether it might be 

Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 1052 Filed 07/07/23 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 17-cv-00223-RS

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

preferable—or perhaps even legally required—to submit to the California Unclaimed Property 

Fund the distributions that would otherwise go to the six investors for whom she currently lacks 

sufficient address information and/or any later unclaimed distributions. In the event the Receiver 

reaches a conclusion that either or both of those categories of funds should go to the California 

Unclaimed Property Fund rather than being redistributed to other claimants or sent to the United 

States Treasury, and the SEC is in agreement, she should submit a revised proposed order with her 

brief. The SEC is permitted, but not required, to submit its own brief setting out any opinions it 

may have on this issue. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 7, 2023

______________________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

Chief United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 1052 Filed 07/07/23 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

Case No. 17-cv-00284-MEJ

301766302v1 0977346

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043

213-680-2800

ROYAL F. OAKES (SBN 080480)

roakes@mail.hinshawlaw.com

JAMES C. CASTLE (SBN 235551)

jcastle@hinshawlaw.com

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043

Telephone: 213-680-2800

Facsimile: 213-614-7399

Attorneys for Defendant

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN KRESICH, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, DOES 1-50,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00284-MEJ

(Honorable Maria-Elena James)

STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

THEREON

Complaint Filed: 7/13/15
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

Case No. 17-cv-00284-MEJ

301766302v1 0977346

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

633 West 5th Street, 47th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043

213-680-2800

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant Metropolitan Life 

Insurance Company (“MetLife”) and Plaintiff John Kresich ("Plaintiff") and through 

their respective counsel, that the above-referenced action be, and is hereby, 

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). 

Each party to bear their own fees and costs. 

DATED: April 25, 2018

By:

RAY BOURHIS ASSOCIATES

/s/Eric Whitehead

Ray Bourhis

Eric Whitehead

Attorneys for Plaintiff John Kresich

DATED: April 25, 2018

By:

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

/s/ James C. Castle

Royal F. Oakes

Michael A.S. Newman

James C. Castle

Attorneys for Defendant 

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

301766302v1 0977346

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation, the case is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). 

Date ___________________ ______________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

April 26, 2018