20270 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 1995 / Notices

interest in the Regional Administrator’s

determinations and of information that

the requesting person intends to submit

at such hearing. (3) The signature of the

individual making the request; or, if the

request is made on behalf of an

organization or other entity, the

signature of a responsible official of the

organization or other entity.

Notice of any hearing shall be given

not less than fifteen (15) days prior to

the time scheduled for the hearing. Such

notice will be made by the Regional

Administrator in the Federal Register

and in newspapers of general

circulation in the State of Michigan. A

notice will be sent to the person(s)

requesting the hearing as well as to the

State of Michigan. The hearing notice

will include a statement of purpose,

information regarding the time and

location, and the address and telephone

number where interested persons may

obtain further information. The Regional

Administrator will issue an order

affirming or rescinding his

determination upon review of the

hearing record. Should the

determination be affirmed, it will

become effective as of the date of the

order.

Should no timely and appropriate

request for a hearing be received, and

should the Regional Administrator not

elect to hold a hearing on his own

motion, these determinations shall

become effective on May 25, 1995.

Please bring this notice to the attention

of any persons known by you to have an

interest in these determinations.

All documents related to these

determinations are available for

inspection between the hours of 8:30

a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, at the following offices:

Michigan Department of Health,

Division of Water Supply, Michigan

Department of Public Health, 3423

North Logan/Martin L. King, Jr. Blvd.,

P.O. Box 30195, Lansing, Michigan

48909.

State Docket Officer: Mr. James K.

Cleland, (517) 335–9216.

Safe Drinking Water Branch, Drinking

Water Section, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois

60604–3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer Kurtz Crooks, Region 5,

Drinking Water Section at the Chicago

address given above, telephone 312/

886–0244.

(Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act,

as amended (1986), and 40 CFR 142.10 of the

National Primary Drinking Water

Regulations)

Signed this 11th day of April, 1995.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator, USEPA, Region 5.

[FR Doc. 95–10145 Filed 4–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 95–07]

SHIPCO Transport Inc. v. Saturn Air

Sea Cargo; Notice of Filing of

Complaint and Assignment

Notice is given that a complaint filed

by Shipco Transport Inc.

(‘‘Complainant’’) against Saturn Air Sea

Cargo (‘‘Respondent’’) was served April

19, 1995. Complainant alleges that

Respondent has violated section 10(a)(1)

of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C.

app. § 1709(a)(1), by failing to pay to

complainant ocean freight due on

numerous shipments of cargo and,

through bad faith and deceitful

misrepresentations, inducing

complainant to relinquish possessory

liens over the cargo.

This proceeding has been assigned to

the Office of Administrative Law Judges.

Hearing in this matter, if any is held,

shall commence within the time

limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,

and only after consideration has been

given by the parties and the presiding

officer to the use of alternative forms of

dispute resolution. The hearing shall

include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the

presiding officer only upon proper

showing that there are genuine issues of

material fact that cannot be resolved on

the basis of sworn statements, affidavits,

depositions, or other documents or that

the nature of the matter in issue is such

that an oral hearing and crossexamination are necessary for the

development of an adequate record.

Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR

502.61, the initial decision of the

presiding officer in this proceeding shall

be issued by April 19, 1996, and the

final decision of the Commission shall

be issued by October 21, 1996.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10083 Filed 4–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

First Union Corporation; Notice to

Engage in Certain Nonbanking

Activities

First Union Corporation, Charlotte,

North Carolina (Notificant), has

provided notice pursuant to section

4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company

Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) (BHC Act) and

§ 225.23(a)(3) of the Board’s Regulation

Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(3)), to engage

through its subsidiary, First Union

Capital Markets Corp., Charlotte, North

Carolina (Company), in underwriting

and dealing in debt and equity

securities of all types, other than shares

of open-end investment companies, and

acting as advisor with respect to swaps,

caps and similar instruments based on

commodities; stock, bond or

commodities indices; or a hybrid of

interest rates and such commodities or

indices. These activities will be

conducted nationwide.

Notificant maintains that the Board

previously has determined that the

proposed activities are closely related to

banking. See Canadian Imperial Bank of

Commerce, 76 Federal Reserve Bulletin

158 (1990); J.P. Morgan & Co.

Incorporated, et al., 75 Federal Reserve

Bulletin 192 (1989), aff’d sub nom.

Securities Industries Ass’n v. Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, 900 F.2d 360 (D.C. Cir. 1990);

and Citicorp, et al., 73 Federal Reserve

Bulletin 473 (1987), aff’d sub nom.

Securities Industry Ass’n v. Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, 839 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.), cert.

denied, 486 U.S. 1059 (1988); Swiss

Bank Corporation, 81 Federal Reserve

Bulletin 185 (1995). Notificant states

that Company would conduct the

proposed activities within the

limitations and prudential guidelines

established by the Board in previous

orders.

In order to approve the proposal, the

Board must determine that the proposed

activities to be conducted by Company

‘‘can reasonably be expected to produce

benefits to the public, such as greater

convenience, increased competition, or

gains in efficiency, that outweigh

possible adverse effects, such as undue

concentration of resources, decreased or

unfair competition, conflicts of

interests, or unsound banking

practices.’’ 12 U.S.C. § 1843(c)(8).

Notificant believes that the proposal

would produce public benefits that

outweigh any potential adverse effects.

In particular, Notificant maintains that

the proposal would enhance

competition and enable Notificant to

offer its customers a broader range of

products. Notificant also maintains that

its proposal would not result in any

adverse effects.

In publishing the proposal for

comment, the Board does not take a

position on issues raised by the

proposal. Notice of the proposal is

published solely to seek the views of