15790 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 1995 / Notices

Signed in Washington, D.C. this 14th day

of March, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–7473 Filed 3–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,049]

Hartz Mountain Corporation Harrison,

NJ; Amended Certification Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on

December 2, 1994, applicable to all

workers of the subject firm engaged in

employment related to the production of

aquariums and reflectors.

The certification notice was published

in the Federal Register on December 16,

1994 (59 FR 65077).

At the request of the State Agency, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. New

findings show that a few workers were

laid off a few weeks before the impact

date of June 16, 1993. Accordingly, the

Department is amending the

certification by deleting the June 16,

1993 impact date and inserting a new

impact date of April 1, 1993.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers

who were adversely affected by

increased imports.

The amended notice applicable to

TA–W–30,049 is hereby issued as

follows:

All workers of Hartz Mountain Corporation

who became totally or partially separated

from employment on or after April 1, 1993

are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance

under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 17th day of

March 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–7474 Filed 3–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–30,049]

Hartz Mountain Corp., Harrison, NJ,

Investigations Regarding Certifications

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance; Correction

This notice corrects the notice for

petition TA–W–30,049 which was

published in the Federal Register on

July 19, 1994 (59 FR 36791) in FR

Document 94–17395.

This revises the date received and the

date of petition on the fifteenth line of

the third and fourth columns in the

appendix table on page 36791. The date

received and the date of petition should

both read ‘‘April 1, 1994’’ in the third

and fourth columns on the fifteenth line

of the appendix table.

Singed in Washington, DC., this 20th day

of March, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–7475 Filed 3–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Determinations Regarding Eligibility

To Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance and NAFTA Transitional

Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of March, 1995.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–30, 680; J.M. Huber Corp.,

(Engineered Minerals Div), Macon, GA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–30,707; Tidewater, Inc., New

Orleans, LA

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

TA–W–30,655; Lavelle Powder Co., Inc.,

Butte, MT

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

TA–W–30,712; U.S. Information Agency,

Voice of America Bethany Relay

Station, Mason, OH

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

TA–W–30,663; E-Systems, Inc.,

Greenville Div., Greenville, TX

The workers’ firm does not produce

an article as required for certification

under section 222 of the Trade Act of

1974.

TA–W–30,646; Enterra Oil Field Rental

Co., Odessa, TX

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–30,791; DLCI USA, Van Buren,

ME

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–30,737; Native Textiles, A

Division of Carisbrook Industries,

Dallas, PA

The investigation revealed that

criterion (2) and criterion (3) have not

been met. Sales or production did not

decline during the relevant period as

required for certification. Increases of

imports of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

the firm or appropriate subdivision have

not contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

TA–W–30,827; Fairchild Aircraft, Inc.,

San Antonio, TX

A certification was issued covering all

workers of the ‘‘electrical shop’’ of

Fairchild Aircraft, Inc., San Antonio

separated on or after March 2, 1994. The

foregoing determination does not apply

to the other workers at the subject firm.

TA–W–30,803, TA–W–30,804; Mitel,

Inc., Mitel Telecommunication

Systems, Inc., Mt. Laurel, NJ and

Morristown, NJ
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 58 / Monday, March 27, 1995 / Notices 15791

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after November

6, 1993.

TA–W–30,653; Licensed Clothing Group

of America, Saddle Brook, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January 4,

1994.

TA–W–30,657; JPS Converter and

Industrial Corp., Laurens, SC

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January 6,

1993.

TA–W–30,698; Classic Fashion,

Paterson, NJ

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

16, 1995.

TA–W–30,755; Philips Components,

Mineral Wells Facility, Mineral

Wells, TX

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

10, 1994.

TA–W–30,665; Cleaver Brooks, A

Division of Aqua Chem, Inc.,

Lebanon, PA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

18, 1995.

TA–W–30,624; Orbital Science Corp.,

Pomona, CA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after December

20, 1993.

TA–W–30,678; Star Fireworks

Manufacturing Co., Inc., Danville,

IL

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January 5,

1994.

TA–W–30,692; Eveready Battery Co.,

Inc., Red Oak, IA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January

17, 1994.

TA–W–30,798; Etowah Manufacturing

Co., Inc., Etowah, TN

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

24, 1994.

TA–W–30,694; Leica, Inc., Buffalo, NY

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 4,

1995.

TA–W–30,667; Oshkosh B’Gosh, Dover,

TN

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January 9,

1994.

TA–W–30,648; Seagull Mid-South, Inc.,

(Formerly Arkla Exploration Co),

Shreveport, LA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January 6,

1994.

TA–W–30,771; Jantzen, Inc., Statesville,

NC

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after March 16,

1994.

TA–W–30,709 and A; Contract

Manufacturing, Monroe, LA and

Monroe Manufacturing, Monroe, LA

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after January

23, 1994.

TA–W–30,727, A & B; Takata

Fabrication Corp., Piqua, OH,

Express Service, Troy, OH and

Brownle Personnel Service, Piqua,

OH

A certification was issued covering all

workers separated on or after February

1, 1994.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with section

250(a) subchapter D, chapter 2, title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the months of March,

1995.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of section 250 of

the Trade Act must be met:

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(A) That sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(B) That imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased.

(C) That the increase in imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(2) That there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

None.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–00359; Contract Apparel,

El Paso, TX

A certification was issued covering all

workers of Contract Apparel, El Paso,

TX separated on or after February 2,

1994.

NAFTA–TAA–00357; Hughes Aircraft,

Microelectronics Div., Newport

Beach, CA

A certification was issued covering all

workers engaged in the production of

hybrid microelectronic circuits and

assemblies at Hughes Aircraft,

Microelectronic Div., Newport Beach,

CA separated on or after January 20,

1994. The foregoing determination does

not apply to the other workers at the

subject firm.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned

determinations were issued during the

months of March, 1995. Copies of these

determinations are available for inspection in

Room C–4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC

20210 during normal business hours or will

be mailed to persons who write to the above

address.

Dated: March 20, 1995.

Victor J. Trunzo,

Program Manager, Policy & Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 95–0783 Filed 3–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

[TA–W–24,446]

Litton Industrial Automation Systems,

Inc., New Britain Machine, New Britain,

CT, and Operating in the Following

State, TA–W–24,446A Texas; Amended

Certification Regarding Eligibility To

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a

Certification of Eligibility to Apply for

Worker Adjustment Assistance on July

27, 1990, applicable to all workers of the

subject firm. The certification notice

was published in the Federal Register

on August 9, 1990 (55 FR 32504).

At the request of one of the workers,

the Department reviewed the

certification for workers of the subject

firm. The findings show an installation

and sales office in Houston, Texas

which experienced a decline in demand

for its services from the subject firm.

The intent of the Department’s

certification is to include all workers