alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# m8654.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.12.2017 C(2017) 9111 final To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M.8654 - CK HUTCHISON / TMA HOLDING / TMA LOGISTICS Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 17 November 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of the Merger Regulation by which Hutchison Ports Netherlands B.V. ("HPN", the Netherlands) and TMA Holding B.V. ("TMA Holding", the Netherlands), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over TMA Logistics B.V. ("TMA Logistics", the Netherlands) , by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for HPN: s ubsidiary of Hutchison Port Holdings ("HPH") Limited - owned by CK Hutchison Holding Limited - operating ports and deep-sea container terminals. In Europe, the HPH Group provides stevedoring services in ports in Belgium, Germany, Poland, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. - for TMA Holding: s tevedoring services (mainly at an inland container terminal in Harlingen, the Netherlands), freight forwarding services and contract logistics services. - for TMA Logistics: s olution for land, sea and air transport, stevedoring (containers and bulk goods), cargo transhipment, project cargoes, storage, and customs handling, including the provision of stevedoring services for containers at container terminals in Velsen and Amsterdam, and Roll-on/Roll-off stevedoring services in Velsen (all in the Netherlands). 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
( S igned ) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 403 , 28.11. 2017 , p. 8 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
---

Exhibit 99.10

CONSENT OF KIRK MINING CONSULTANTS PTY LIMITED To:

   United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549Alberta Securities CommissionBritish Columbia Securities CommissionOntario Securities CommissionRio Alto Mining Limited
 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Technical report entitled “La Arena Project, Peru”, effective September 30, 2011 (the “Report” prepared for Rio Alto Mining Limited (the “Company") We do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled the “La Arena Project, Peru”, effective September 30, 2011 (the “Technical Report”), prepared by Enrique Garay, M Sc. P. Geo. (MAIG), Ian Dreyer, B.App. Sc, MAusIMM (CP), Linton Kirk, B.E. (Min), FAusIMM (CP) and Chris Kaye, B E (Chem) FAusIMM and of extracts from or a summary of the technical report and of certain mineral resource or reserve estimates and other information pertaining to the project, the use of our name in the Company's Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the "AIF") and to being named in the AIF. The undersigned further acknowledges that the AIF will be filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the "Form 40-F") and consents to being named in the Form 40-F and authorize the use of the information represented therein relating to the Report. DATED the 28 day of March, 2013 By:

   /s/ Linton KirkCompany: KIRK MINING CONSULTANTS PTYLIMITEDName: Linton Kirk, B.E. (Min), FAusIMM (CPTitle: Director and Principal Mining Engineer


---
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |                                                                         |   |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  March 31, 2011 | /s/ Dennis Neclerio                                                          |   |
|                            | Dennis Neclerio                                                              |   |
|                            | President                                                                    |   |
|                            | (principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer) |   |

----
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of co-chief executive officer for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners
L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated December 4, 2007, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, Brookfield Infrastructure L.P., Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings (Canada) Inc.,
Brookfield Asset Management Barbados Inc. and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of
the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the
information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Dated: June 30, 2008



/s/ Samuel PollockSamuel PollockCo-CEO, Brookfield Infrastructure Group Corporation
STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Mark HARRIS and Heather Harris, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2539

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Joshua N. JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
TRANSCARGA INTL. AIRWAYS, C.A., etc., Appellant, v. ADVANTA SEEDS INTERNATIONAL, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-892

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Warren Gammill & Associates, P.L., and Warren P. Gammill, Miami, for appellant.

Vazquez & Associates, and Gerardo A. Vazquez, Miami and Steven B. Herzberg, for appellees.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER, J., and LEBAN, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

*492Affirmed. *See**Machtinger v. Inertial Airline Servs., Inc.*, 937 So.2d 730, 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (observing that, although "a trial court's order on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is de novo," where "the trial court's decision is based on live testimony, the appellate court defers to the trial court's determinations of the facts"); *Rudel v. Rudel*, 111 So.3d 285 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (holding that where trial court's determination of its jurisdiction is based upon a finding of fact, an appellate court reviews those findings for competent, substantial evidence). *See also**Bohlander v. Robert Dean & Assoc. Yacht Brokerage, Inc.*, 920 So.2d 1226, 1228 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (holding: "The due process requirement of minimum contacts is not satisfied by a showing that a party has entered into a contract with a non-resident, or a showing that payment must be made in Florida"); *deMco Tech., Inc. v. C.S. Engineered Castings, Inc.*, 769 So.2d 1128, 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that, in a breach of contract action to collect on a promissory note, defendant's failure to pay the debt owed in Florida, together with a choice-of-law provision in the note requiring that it be construed in accordance with Florida law, was insufficient to establish long-arm jurisdiction over the non-resident defendant).
# L_2018136EN.01000901.xml

| 1.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 136/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 136/9

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/792

of 28 May 2018

appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Sweden, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Swedish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. On 30 November 2017, by Council Decision (EU) 2017/2237 (4), Ms Heléne FRITZON was replaced by Ms Katrin STJERNFEDT JAMMEH as a member. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. On 30 November 2017, by Council Decision (EU) 2017/2237 (4), Ms Heléne FRITZON was replaced by Ms Katrin STJERNFEDT JAMMEH as a member.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Katrin STJERNFELDT JAMMEH as a member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Katrin STJERNFELDT JAMMEH as a member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Ms Carina NILSSON, Ledamot i kommunfullmäktige, Malmö kommun. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Carina NILSSON, Ledamot i kommunfullmäktige, Malmö kommun.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 May 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. KARANIKOLOV

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

(4)  Council Decision (EU) 2017/2237 of 30 November 2017 appointing two members, proposed by the Kingdom of Sweden, of the Committee of the Regions (OJ L 320, 6.12.2017, p. 10).

4

---
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RISENHOOVER, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 17-00326 BLF (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION; 

GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER 

OR AMEND JUDGMENT 

(Docket No. 102) 

Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at Pelican Bay State Prison 

(“PBSP”), where Plaintiff was formerly housed. The Court found the complaint stated a 

cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs 

and directed Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive 

motion which they did. (Docket Nos. 53, 76.) The Court granted Defendants Risenhoover 

and Adam’s summary judgment motion and dismissed the Eighth Amendment claim 

against them. (Docket No. 99.) However, Defendants McCall and Afdahl were directed to 

file a renewed summary judgment motion. (Id.) 

Defendants McCall and Afdahl have filed a motion for an extension of time to file a 

summary judgment motion, supported by a declaration from counsel. (Docket No. 102, 
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

102-1.) Good cause appearing, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall file 

a motion for summary judgment no later than October 1, 2019. Plaintiff’s opposition 

shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendants on later than twenty-eight (28 days 

from the date Defendants’ motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than 

fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff’s opposition is filed. 

Plaintiff has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment with respect to the 

Court’s granting of Defendants Risenhoover and Adam’s summary judgment motion. 

(Docket No. 100.) Defendants also move for an extension of time to file an opposition to 

this motion. Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. Defendants’ opposition 

shall also be filed no later than October 1, 2019. Plaintiff’s reply shall be filed no later 

than fourteen (14) days from the date Defendants’ opposition is filed. 

This order terminates Docket No. 102. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _____________________ ________________________ 

BETH LABSON FREEMAN 

United States District Judge 

Order Granting Mot. for Ext. of Time 

PRO-SE\HRL\CR.17\00326Hollis_eot-msj&opp
Case 4:05-cr-00309-MJJ Document 16 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:05-cr-00309-MJJ Document 16 Filed 07/05/05 Page 2 of 2
Thomas W. ROGERS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2129

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is granted.
exv10w45






Exhibit 10.45




BIOGEN, INC.

1985 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN




AMENDMENT




     The Biogen, Inc. 1985 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (“the Plan”) is hereby amended as
follows:


In the second paragraph of Section III (“Shares Subject to the Plan”), the words “after the
Committee, in its sole discretion, has interpreted the effect of” are hereby deleted and replaced
with the words “as adjusted following”.




Date: October 13, 2008
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 4, 2015

d0901 

# Order

Clerk September 4, 2015

151732(69)

In re NORFLEET/WINBUSH

- BEY/NEWTON

- BEY/NORFLEET

- BEY, Minors

. SC: 15173 2

COA: 323110

Macomb CC Family Division:

2013

- 000397

- NA;

2013

- 000398

- NA;

2013

- 000399

- NA;

2013

- 000400

- NA;

2013

- 000401

- NA;

2013

- 000402

- NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 2, 2015

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS L. WOLFE,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAPLE STREET CORRECTIONAL 

CENTER, et al.,

Defendant(s).

Case No. 17-cv-00329-SK (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On April 26, 2017, the post office returned the court’s mail to plaintiff as undeliverable. 

Because more than 60 days have passed since the court’s mail to plaintiff was returned as 

undeliverable, and the court has received no written communication from plaintiff indicating a 

current address, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 3-11(b). 

The clerk is instructed to close the file and terminate all pending motions as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 27, 2017

______________________________________

SALLIE KIM

United States Magistrate Judge
----------

X

June 18, 2017

-----------
** **

**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Robert Mohr, certifythat:

 

6.     Ihave reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dynastar Holdings, Inc.

 

7.     Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

8.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

 

9.     Iam responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have;

 

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)      Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under yoursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(d)      Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarterof the registrant’s 2011 fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

10.    Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)      Allsignificant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,****summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)      Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lawrence Weisdorn, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:  December 4, 2009  /s/ LAWRENCE WEISDORNLawrence Weisdorn
Principal Financial Officer