Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 1995 / Notices 20269

and that it has agreed to reimburse

Viking for the costs of the facilities.

It is also stated that the total

quantities are within authorized

quantities and the delivery point would

be of no detriment to any of Viking’s

other customers.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to

§ 157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10094 Filed 4–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–5196–6]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.), this notice announces that

the Information Collection Request (ICR)

abstracted below has been forwarded to

the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for review and comment. The

ICR describes the nature of the

information collection and its expected

cost and burden; where appropriate, it

includes the actual data collection

instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before May 25, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, or a copy of this

ICR, contact Sandy Farmer at (202) 260–

2740, please refer to EPA ICR #107.05.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Office of Air and Radiation

Title: Source Compliance and State

Action Reporting (EPA ICR #107.05;

OMB #2060–0096). This ICR requests

renewal of the existing clearance.

Abstract: State, District,

Commonwealth, and territorial

governments make air compliance

information available to EPA on a

quarterly basis via input to the

Aerometric Information Retrieval

System (AIRS) Facility Subsystem

(AFS). The information provided to EPA

includes compliance determinations

and compliance activities. EPA uses this

information to assess progress toward

meeting emission requirements

developed under the authority of the

Clean Air Act to protect and maintain

the atmospheric environment and the

public health. All ten EPA Regional

Offices and most of the 55 State,

District, Commonwealth and territorial

governments use the compliance

information in AFS on a daily basis for

managing activities of their air pollution

control programs.

Burden Statement: Public reporting

burden for this collection of information

is estimated to average 224 hours per

small state, 1692 hours per medium

state and 1700 hours per large state

annually per response, including time

for reviewing instructions, searching

existing data sources, gathering the data

needed, completing the collection of

information, and maintaining records.

Respondents: State, District,

Commonwealth, and Territorial air

pollution control agencies.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

55.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on

Respondents: 58,686 hours.

Frequency of Collection: quarterly.

Send comments regarding the burden

estimate, or any other aspect of this

information collection, including

suggestions for reducing the burden,

(please refer to EPA ICR #107.05 and

OMB #2060–0096) to:

Sandy Farmer,

EPA ICR #107.05,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Information Policy Branch (2136),

401 M Street SW.,

Washington, DC 20460

and

Chris Wolz,

OMB #2060–0096,

Office of Management and Budget,

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs,

725 17th Street NW.,

Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: April 18, 1995.

Joseph Retzer,

Chief, Regulatory Information Division.

[FR Doc. 95–10142 Filed 4–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M

[FRL–5196–3]

Public Water System Supervision

Program Revision for the State of

Michigan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given

in accordance with the provision of

Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water

Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.,

and 40 CFR part 142, subpart B, the

National Primary Drinking Water

Regulations (NPDWR), that the State of

Michigan is revising its approved Public

Water System Supervision (PWSS)

primacy program. The Michigan

Department of Public Health (MDPH)

has adopted drinking water regulations

for Lead and Copper, 18 synthetic

organic chemicals (SOCs), and 5

inorganic chemicals (IOCs), that

correspond to the NPDWR for Lead and

Copper, SOCs, and IOCs, and

promulgated by the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) on June 7,

1991 (56 FR 26460–26564), and on July

17, 1992 (57 FR 31776–31849). The

USEPA has completed its review of

Michigan’s PWSS primacy program

revision.

The USEPA has determined that the

Michigan rule revisions meet the

requirements of the Federal rule.

Therefore, the USEPA has determined

that the State program revisions

referenced above are no less stringent

than the corresponding Federal

regulations and is proposing to approve

the MDPH’s rule revisions.

All interested parties are invited to

submit written comments on these

proposed determinations, and may

request a public hearing on or before

May 25, 1995. If a public hearing is

requested and granted, the

corresponding determination shall not

become effective until such time

following the hearing, at which the

Regional Administrator issues an order

affirming or rescinding this action.

Frivolous or insubstantial requests for a

hearing may be denied by the Regional

Administrator.

Requests for public hearing should be

addressed to: Jennifer Kurtz Crooks,

(WD–17J), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois

60604.

Any request for a public hearing shall

include the following: (1) The name,

address, and telephone number of the

individual, organization, or other entity

requesting a hearing. (2) A brief

statement of the requesting person’s
20270 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 25, 1995 / Notices

interest in the Regional Administrator’s

determinations and of information that

the requesting person intends to submit

at such hearing. (3) The signature of the

individual making the request; or, if the

request is made on behalf of an

organization or other entity, the

signature of a responsible official of the

organization or other entity.

Notice of any hearing shall be given

not less than fifteen (15) days prior to

the time scheduled for the hearing. Such

notice will be made by the Regional

Administrator in the Federal Register

and in newspapers of general

circulation in the State of Michigan. A

notice will be sent to the person(s)

requesting the hearing as well as to the

State of Michigan. The hearing notice

will include a statement of purpose,

information regarding the time and

location, and the address and telephone

number where interested persons may

obtain further information. The Regional

Administrator will issue an order

affirming or rescinding his

determination upon review of the

hearing record. Should the

determination be affirmed, it will

become effective as of the date of the

order.

Should no timely and appropriate

request for a hearing be received, and

should the Regional Administrator not

elect to hold a hearing on his own

motion, these determinations shall

become effective on May 25, 1995.

Please bring this notice to the attention

of any persons known by you to have an

interest in these determinations.

All documents related to these

determinations are available for

inspection between the hours of 8:30

a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through

Friday, at the following offices:

Michigan Department of Health,

Division of Water Supply, Michigan

Department of Public Health, 3423

North Logan/Martin L. King, Jr. Blvd.,

P.O. Box 30195, Lansing, Michigan

48909.

State Docket Officer: Mr. James K.

Cleland, (517) 335–9216.

Safe Drinking Water Branch, Drinking

Water Section, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois

60604–3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jennifer Kurtz Crooks, Region 5,

Drinking Water Section at the Chicago

address given above, telephone 312/

886–0244.

(Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act,

as amended (1986), and 40 CFR 142.10 of the

National Primary Drinking Water

Regulations)

Signed this 11th day of April, 1995.

Valdas V. Adamkus,

Regional Administrator, USEPA, Region 5.

[FR Doc. 95–10145 Filed 4–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 95–07]

SHIPCO Transport Inc. v. Saturn Air

Sea Cargo; Notice of Filing of

Complaint and Assignment

Notice is given that a complaint filed

by Shipco Transport Inc.

(‘‘Complainant’’) against Saturn Air Sea

Cargo (‘‘Respondent’’) was served April

19, 1995. Complainant alleges that

Respondent has violated section 10(a)(1)

of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C.

app. § 1709(a)(1), by failing to pay to

complainant ocean freight due on

numerous shipments of cargo and,

through bad faith and deceitful

misrepresentations, inducing

complainant to relinquish possessory

liens over the cargo.

This proceeding has been assigned to

the Office of Administrative Law Judges.

Hearing in this matter, if any is held,

shall commence within the time

limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,

and only after consideration has been

given by the parties and the presiding

officer to the use of alternative forms of

dispute resolution. The hearing shall

include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the

presiding officer only upon proper

showing that there are genuine issues of

material fact that cannot be resolved on

the basis of sworn statements, affidavits,

depositions, or other documents or that

the nature of the matter in issue is such

that an oral hearing and crossexamination are necessary for the

development of an adequate record.

Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR

502.61, the initial decision of the

presiding officer in this proceeding shall

be issued by April 19, 1996, and the

final decision of the Commission shall

be issued by October 21, 1996.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 95–10083 Filed 4–24–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

First Union Corporation; Notice to

Engage in Certain Nonbanking

Activities

First Union Corporation, Charlotte,

North Carolina (Notificant), has

provided notice pursuant to section

4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company

Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) (BHC Act) and

§ 225.23(a)(3) of the Board’s Regulation

Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(3)), to engage

through its subsidiary, First Union

Capital Markets Corp., Charlotte, North

Carolina (Company), in underwriting

and dealing in debt and equity

securities of all types, other than shares

of open-end investment companies, and

acting as advisor with respect to swaps,

caps and similar instruments based on

commodities; stock, bond or

commodities indices; or a hybrid of

interest rates and such commodities or

indices. These activities will be

conducted nationwide.

Notificant maintains that the Board

previously has determined that the

proposed activities are closely related to

banking. See Canadian Imperial Bank of

Commerce, 76 Federal Reserve Bulletin

158 (1990); J.P. Morgan & Co.

Incorporated, et al., 75 Federal Reserve

Bulletin 192 (1989), aff’d sub nom.

Securities Industries Ass’n v. Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, 900 F.2d 360 (D.C. Cir. 1990);

and Citicorp, et al., 73 Federal Reserve

Bulletin 473 (1987), aff’d sub nom.

Securities Industry Ass’n v. Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve

System, 839 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.), cert.

denied, 486 U.S. 1059 (1988); Swiss

Bank Corporation, 81 Federal Reserve

Bulletin 185 (1995). Notificant states

that Company would conduct the

proposed activities within the

limitations and prudential guidelines

established by the Board in previous

orders.

In order to approve the proposal, the

Board must determine that the proposed

activities to be conducted by Company

‘‘can reasonably be expected to produce

benefits to the public, such as greater

convenience, increased competition, or

gains in efficiency, that outweigh

possible adverse effects, such as undue

concentration of resources, decreased or

unfair competition, conflicts of

interests, or unsound banking

practices.’’ 12 U.S.C. § 1843(c)(8).

Notificant believes that the proposal

would produce public benefits that

outweigh any potential adverse effects.

In particular, Notificant maintains that

the proposal would enhance

competition and enable Notificant to

offer its customers a broader range of

products. Notificant also maintains that

its proposal would not result in any

adverse effects.

In publishing the proposal for

comment, the Board does not take a

position on issues raised by the

proposal. Notice of the proposal is

published solely to seek the views of