Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 4, 2025 / Notices 8923 

1See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 56295 

(July 9, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024 (barcode ACCESS 

code 4605486–01, dated July 29, 2024). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated October 31, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated December 9, 2024. 

5See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 56296. 

6See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain: 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Order, 70 FR 36562 

(June 24, 2005) (Order). 

7For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Preliminary Results PDM at 2. 

8See Preliminary Results. 

9See Order. 

10For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–469–814] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From Spain: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

sales of chlorinated isocyanurates 

(chlorinated isos) from Spain were not 

sold in the United States at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR), June 1, 2022, through 

May 31, 2023. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 9, 2024, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register the Preliminary 

Results of the 2022–2023 administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on chlorinated isos from Spain.1 On July 

22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.2 On October 

31, 2024, Commerce extended the 

deadline for the final results of review 

until January 10, 2025.3 Additionally, 

on December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled 

the deadline to issue the final results in 

this administrative review by 90 days.4

Accordingly, the deadline for these final 

results is now April 10, 2025. 

We invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results; 5

however, no interested party submitted 

comments. Accordingly, the final results 

remain unchanged from the Preliminary 

Results, and thus, there are no decision 

memoranda accompanying this notice. 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 6

The products covered by the Order 

are chlorinated isos from China.7

Final Results of Review 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

calculated weighted-average dumping 

margins for 

Ercros S.A. (Ercros) and 

Electroquimica de Hernani, S.A. (EHER) 

that are zero, and we did not calculate 

any margins which are not zero, de 

minimis, or determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. Therefore, 

consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of 

the Act, in the Preliminary Results we 

applied to Industrias Quimicas Tamar 

S.L. (Industrias Quimicas Tamar), the 

company not selected for individual 

examination in this review, a margin of 

zero percent. We received no comments 

with respect to our preliminary finding. 

Therefore, for these final results, we 

continue to determine the following 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the period June 1, 2022, through May 

31, 2023: 

Manufacturer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Ercros S.A .................................. 0.00 

Electroquimica de Hernani, S.A 0.00 

Industrias Quimicas Tamar S.L .. 0.00 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce will disclose to 

the parties in a proceeding the 

calculations performed in connection 

with the final results within five days of 

any public announcement or, if there is 

no public announcement, within five 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of final results in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Because Commerce received 

no comments and therefore, has not 

modified its analysis or calculations 

from the Preliminary Results,8 there are 

no new calculations to disclose for these 

final results of review in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined in these final 

results of this review, and U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) shall 

assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for examined sales to each 

importer to the total entered value of 

those sales. Where an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

In accordance with Commerce’s 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for 

entries of subject merchandise that 

entered the United States during the 

POR that were produced by each 

respondent for which it did not know 

that its merchandise was destined to the 

United States, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at 

the all-others rate (i.e., 24.83 percent),9

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.10

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of chlorinated isos from 

Spain entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of this notice in the 

Federal Register, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rate for the companies under 

review will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section above 

(except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, 

no cash deposit will be required); (2) for 

merchandise that was exported by a 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
8924 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 4, 2025 / Notices 

11See Order. 

1See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from 

the Republic of Korea: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 

87 FR 26343 (May 4, 2022) (Final Results). 

2See Wheatland Tube v. United States, 650 F. 

Supp. 3d 1379, 1383 (CIT 2023). 

3See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, Wheatland Tube v. United States, 

Court No. 22–00160, Slip Op. 23–112 (CIT June 9, 

2023), dated November 1, 2023 (Final 

Redetermination). 

4See Wheatland Tube v. United States, Court No. 

22–00160, Slip Op. 25–5 (CIT January 15, 2025). 

5See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 

(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

6See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers 

Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 

2010) (Diamond Sawblades). 

company that is not under review and 

the company has a company-specific 

cash deposit rate from a completed 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific cash deposit rate from 

a completed segment of the proceeding 

that is currently applicable to the 

company; (3) if the exporter of the 

subject merchandise was not covered by 

this review or a previously completed 

segment of this proceeding, but the 

producer of the subject merchandise 

was covered, then the cash deposit rate 

will be equal to the company-specific 

cash deposit rate from a completed 

segment of this proceeding that is 

currently applicable to the producer of 

the subject merchandise; and, (4) if 

neither the exporter nor the producer of 

the subject merchandise was covered by 

this review or a previously completed 

segment of this proceeding, then the 

cash deposit rate will be 24.83 percent 

ad valorem, the all-others rate 

established in the less than fair value 

investigation.11 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during the POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 28, 2025. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2025–02216 Filed 2–3–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–809] 

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe 

From the Republic of Korea: Notice of 

Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

the Results of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; Notice of 

Amended Final Results 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 15, 2025, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued its final judgment in Wheatland 

Tube v. United States, Court no. 22– 

00160, sustaining the U.S. Department 

of Commerce (Commerce)’s first remand 

results pertaining to the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on circular welded non-alloy steel 

pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea 

(Korea) covering the period November 1, 

2019 through October 31, 2020. 

Commerce is notifying the public that 

the CIT’s final judgment is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s final results 

of the administrative review, and that 

Commerce is amending the final results 

with respect to the dumping margin 

assigned to Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel), 

Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai), and 

the companies not selected for 

individual examination. 

DATES: Applicable January 24, 2025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dusten Hom, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5075. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 4, 2022, Commerce published 

its Final Results in the 2019–2020 AD 

administrative review of CWP from 

Korea. Commerce granted a constructed 

export price (CEP) offset to both 

Hyundai and Husteel (collectively, the 

mandatory respondents). The calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

Hyundai and Husteel were 4.07 percent 

and 1.97 percent, respectively. 

Furthermore, the review specific rate 

assigned to companies not selected for 

individual examination was 3.21 

percent.1

Wheatland Tube appealed 

Commerce’s Final Results. On August 3, 

2023, the CIT remanded the Final 

Results to Commerce to: (1) provide the 

mandatory respondents with notice of 

deficiency in their respective 

submissions supporting their claims 

that home market sales during the 

period of review were at a more 

advanced level of trade (LOT) than the 

CEP level of trade; and (2) provide, to 

the extent practicable, an opportunity to 

remedy or explain the deficiencies 

identified in the Final Results.2

Commerce subsequently issued a 

supplemental questionnaire on remand 

to each of the mandatory respondents 

identifying deficiencies and requesting 

information regarding their respective 

LOT analyses. In its Final 

Redetermination, issued in November 

2023, Commerce denied a CEP offset to 

both of the mandatory respondents and 

recalculated the weighted-average 

dumping margins for both Hyundai and 

Husteel without a CEP offset, and 

revised the review specific rate assigned 

to companies not selected for individual 

examination.3 The CIT sustained 

Commerce’s Final Redetermination.4

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,5 as clarified 

by Diamond Sawblades,6 the U.S. Court 

of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held 

that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), Commerce must publish a 

notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in 

harmony’’ with a Commerce 

determination and must suspend 

liquidation of entries pending a 

‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

January 15, 2025, judgment constitutes 

a final decision of the CIT that is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s Final 

Results. Thus, this notice is published 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1