**EXHIBIT 34.1**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To theBoard of Directors of Fifth Third Bank 

Cincinnati, Ohio 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation ABServicing Criteria, that Fifth Third Bank (“Fifth Third” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all asset-backedsecurities transactions, for which Fifth Third acted as servicer involving retail auto loans, that have been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, where the related asset-backed securitieswere outstanding during the reporting period (the “Platform”) as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, excluding criteria set forth in Sections **1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv),1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122 (d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv),**which management hasdetermined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Appendix B of management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on ourexamination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Companyperformed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

As described in management’s assertion, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(ii), the Company has engaged a vendor to perform certain activities required bythis servicing criteria. The Company has determined that this vendor is not considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicingcriteria applicable to this as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to this vendor as permitted by the SEC’s Compliance andDisclosure Interpretation 

200.06, Vendors Engaged by Servicers (“C&DI 200.06”) (formerly SEC Manual Telephone Interpretation 17.06). As permitted by C&DI 200.06, the Company has asserted that it haspolicies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to this vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining thatit meets the SEC requirements to apply C&DI 200.06 for the vendor and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company’s determination of its eligibility to apply C&DI 200.06.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2014 for all asset-backed securities transactions, for which Fifth Third acted as servicer involving retail auto loans, that have been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, wherethe related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the reporting period Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

Cincinnati, Ohio

March 27, 2015