alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(a)



TXU US Holdings Company

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO



The undersigned, T. L. Baker, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive of TXU US Holdings Company (the Company), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
this 16th day of May, 2005.



/s/ T.L. BakerName: T. L. BakerTitle: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU US Holdings Company and will be retained by TXU US Holdings Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
 
 /s/
      Richard W. McCullough
              
              December 18,
      2009Richard
      W. McCulloughChief
      Executive OfficerPetroleum
      Development CorporationManaging
      General Partner/s/
      Gysle R. Shellum
              
              December 18,
      2009Gysle
      R. ShellumChief
      Financial OfficerPetroleum
      Development CorporationManaging
      General Partner
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
EX-34.1
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800
Dallas TX 75201-2997
Telephone (214) 999 1400
Facsimile (214) 754 7991


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance, that First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas,
L.P. (the "Company" and an indirect subsidiary of The First American
Corporation) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for
residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the
Company served as the residential and commercial tax service provider (the
"Platform"), as of December 31, 2007 and for the year then ended, excluding
criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iii), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv),
1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv)-(xv), which the Company has determined are
not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the
Platform. Management's assertion identifies the individual securities defined by
management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and the servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent
to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential and
commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 12, 2008
Leon MCGHEE v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-16-1244

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Terrance YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-439

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Situation in and in Relation to Burma

On February 10, 2021, by Executive Order 14014, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in and in relation to Burma.

The situation in and in relation to Burma, and in particular the February 1, 2021, coup—in which the military overthrew the democratically elected civilian government of Burma and unjustly arrested and detained government leaders, politicians, human rights defenders, journalists, and religious leaders, thereby rejecting the will of the people of Burma and undermining the country's democratic transition and rule of law—continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on February 10, 2021, must continue in effect beyond February 10, 2025. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14014 with respect to the situation in and in relation to Burma.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2025-02405

Billing code 3395-F4-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of The Wilber Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

| | (a)    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine month period ended September 30, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | 
| | (b)    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by this report.                                                                                 | 

| | /s/ Alfred S. Whittet                                                             | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Alfred S. Whittet
President and Chief Executive Officer 
Date:   November 4, 2004 | 

31

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STARVONNA HARRIS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BEST BUY STORES, L.P.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00446-HSG 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 46

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended 

complaint, Dkt. No. 46, which is now fully briefed. The motion seeks to add a seventh cause of 

action for violation of the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), Cal. Labor Code § 2698 et 

seq., by Plaintiff Harris, on behalf of Defendant’s current and former California employees. Dkt. 

No. 46-2 at 22–24 (redlined second amended complaint). Under Federal Rule of Procedure 

15(a)(2), “leave to amend shall be freely granted ‘when justice so requires.’” Townsend v. Univ. 

of Alaska, 543 F.3d 478, 485 (9th Cir. 2008) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2)). “This policy is to 

be applied with extreme liberality.” Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1051 

(9th Cir. 2003) (internal quotation marks omitted). The five factors relevant to determining proper 

amendment are (1) bad faith, (2) undue delay, (3) prejudice to the opposing party, (4) futility of 

amendment, and (5) previous amendments. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962); see also 

Wash. State Republican Party v. Wash. State Grange, 676 F.3d 784, 797 (9th Cir. 2012) (same 

factors). The Court weighs prejudice to the opposing party most heavily. Eminence Capital, 316 

F.3d at 1052 (9th Cir. 2003). “Absent prejudice, or a strong showing of any of the remaining 

Foman factors, there exists a presumption under Rule 15(a) in favor of granting leave to amend.” 

Id. (emphasis in original). Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the Court finds that 

Defendant has failed to demonstrate prejudice or make a strong showing as to any of the other 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Foman factors, and the presumption in favor of granting leave to amend applies. The Court thus 

GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion.

1

 The second amended complaint must be filed by July 14, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

 

1

The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is 

deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b).

7/13/2017
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 12, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02509]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JOINT BOARD FOR THE ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES

Meeting of the Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting; amended.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the location of the partially closed 
meeting of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations previously 
announced in the Federal Register of December 16, 2024.

DATES: January 6, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and January 7, 
2025, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Van Osten, Designated 
Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations, at (202) 
312-3648 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As published in the Federal Register of 
December 16, 2024 (89 FR 101626), the meeting was to be held at the 
Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20224. However, due to a weather-related building closure precluding an 
in-person meeting, the meeting was held by teleconference instead. 
There were no other changes to the meeting. Because the circumstances 
necessitating the change to the venue of the meeting were beyond the 
control of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, it was 
unable to provide public notification about the changes, as required by 
41 CFR 102-3.150(a).

    Dated: February 7, 2025.
Thomas V. Curtin, Jr.,
Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.
[FR Doc. 2025-02509 Filed 2-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.2

                                     FORM OF
                          NOTICE OF STOCK OPTION GRANT


Mr. Roger S. Mertz 1448 Industrial Ave Sebastopol, CA 95472


You have been granted an option to purchase Common Stock of SonomaWest Holdings,
Inc., a California corporation (the "Company") as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                              <C>
                 Grant Number                                    181

                 Date of Grant                                   July 17, 2001

                 Option Price Per Share                          $7.48

                 Total Number of Shares Granted                  5,000

                 Total Price Of Shares Granted                   $37,400

                 Type of Option                                  [ ] Incentive Stock Option
                                                                 [X] Non-Qualified Stock Option

                 Term/Expiration Date                            July 17, 2011
</TABLE>

EXERCISE SCHEDULE

This  Option  may be  exercised  in  whole or in part,  in  accordance  with the
following vesting schedule:

VESTING SCHEDULE

DATE OF VESTING                NUMBER OF SHARES            TOTAL VESTED

July 17, 2001                  5,000                       5,000

This option may be exercised for three months after  membership on the Company's
Board of  Directors  terminates  except as set out in Sections 6, 7 and 8 of the
Stock Option Agreement (but in no event later than the Expiration Date).

By your signature and the signature of the Company's  representative  below, you
and the  Company  agree that this  Option is granted  under and  governed by the
terms and conditions of the SonomaWest  Holdings 1996, Stock Option Plan and the
Stock  Option  Agreement,  all of  which  are  attached  and made a part of this
document.

OPTIONEE:                              SONOMAWEST HOLDINGS, INC.



                                       By:
---------------------------              ---------------------------------
Signature                                Names:
                                              ----------------------------
                                         Title:
                                              ----------------------------

<PAGE>
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED, Appellant

v.

SANOFI MATURE IP, Appellee

______________________

2020

- 1302

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016

- 00712.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ATTHEW R. R EED

, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by G EORGE E. P OWELL

, III ; J AD A LLEN M ILLS

, S TEVEN W ILLIAM P ARMELEE

, M ICHAEL T. R OSATO

, Seattle, WA;

W ENDY L. D EVINE , San Francisco, CA.

D ANIEL J OHN M INION

, Venable LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by K ATHERINE A DAMS

, W HITNEY L YNN M EIER

, W ILLIAM E. S OLANDER

, M ICHAEL S.

S CERBO

. Case: 20-1302 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 01/15/2021______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, O’M ALLEY

, and W ALLACH

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 15, 2021

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 20-1302 Document: 48 Page: 2 Filed: 01/15/2021
Mandingo BOOBYYAA, DOC #250833, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3165

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stream Global Services, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Kathryn V. Marinello, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to her knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 2, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    Kathryn V. Marinello                                                                       
|                     |  |  |  | Kathryn V. Marinello Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive
officer)
---

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Andrew Grieve, certify that:

1.         
 I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Fsona Systems
Corp.;

2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.           I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and I have:

a)          
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)          
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)           disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.

5.          
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)           all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)           any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 21, 2007



/s/ Andrew Grieve Andrew Grieve President,
Secretary, and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---