alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TtriffimiifMiii

• MUST

EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT

. • -j

If you do not want a payment from theSettlement, but you want to keep the right to sueor

continue to sue the Defendants on your own for the SettlementClass Claims, then you must take

steps to get out of the Settlement Class. This is called excluding yourselfor "opting out" of the

Settlement Class.

13. How Do 1 Get Out ofthe Settlement Class?

To exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must send aletter by mail stating that

you "request exclusion from the Settlement Class in the Yahoo Seamties Litigationr To be valid,

the letter must stale (A) your name, address, telephone number, signature, and e-mail address (it

any)' (B) the dale, number ofYahoo securities, and dollar amount of all purchases, acquisitions, sales or dispositions of Yahoo securities between April 30, 2013 and December 14, 2016, both

dates inclusive- and (C) the number of Yahoo securities held by you as of December 14, 2016.

Any request for exclusion must be signed and submitted by you, as the beneficial owner, under penalty ofperjury. You must submit your exclusion request so that it is postmarked no later than

August 16,2018 at:

Inre Yahoo! Inc. Securities Litigation

Exclusions

do iND Legal Administration

P.O. Box 91347

Seattle, WA98111

JONATHAN COMBS

notary public STATE OF WISCONSIN

ILLEGAL

state of Wisconsin"! gg Waukesha County/

% -r

d and sworn to betdre me

ry Pubiic Waukesha

comrltf^slo^ 2>!0trsi-^

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 265 Filed 08/02/18 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 265 Filed 08/02/18 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 265 Filed 08/02/18 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 265 Filed 08/02/18 Page 4 of 4
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. OP 22 - 0285 MICHAEL BRADLEY BURTON ,

P etitioner , v. CAPTAIN TOM SEIFERT, Captain,

Resp ondent . **GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Respondent ’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Respondent is gran ted an extension of time to and including August 1 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 29 2022

06/29/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0285
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ended June 30, 2008, fairly represents in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Alliance      Recovery Corporation. |

| Date:        September 19, 2008 |
|-------------------------------------------|

| By:   | /s/      Peter Vaisler                                                                               |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            | Peter      Vaisler                                                                                   |
|            | Chief      Executive OfficerPrincipal      Financial Officer,Principal      Accounting Officer  |
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.10

                                  June 2, 2003

Wemer Co.
93 Werner Road
Greenville, PA 16125-9499
Attention:    Eric J. Werner, Esq.
              General Counsel


                      Re: Consent to Stock Unit Adjustment


Dear Sir:
         I am the sole participant in the Werner Co. Deferred Stock Plan (the
"Plan"). I understand that Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. ("the Parent Company")
has entered into a Recapitalization and Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May
7, 2003 by and among the Parent Company, its shareholders and Green Equity
Investors III, L.P. (the "Recapitalization Agreement"), pursuant to which (i)
each outstanding share of Class C Stock of Parent Company will be reclassified
and converted into the right to receive 0.396646 shares of Class R Stock of
Parent Company and the right to retain 0.603354 shares of Post-Recapitalization
Class C Stock of Parent Company as defined in the Recapitalization Agreement,
and (ii) all of the Class R Stock of Parent Company into which the Class C Stock
is converted will be redeemed at a price of $4,929.66 per share.
         I further understand that, to take account of the recapitalization and
redemption contemplated by the Recapitalization Agreement, the Board of
Directors of Werner Co., as administrator of the Plan, has proposed as a
proportionate and equitable adjustment to the Stock Units in my Stock Unit
Account under the Plan, to cancel 518.8130 Stock Units now credited to my Stock
Unit Account and to substitute for such Stock Units a deferred compensation
dollar account at an initial value of $2,557,571.54, representing $4,929.66 for
each Stock Unit cancelled. I agree to the proposed cancellation of Stock Units
and creation of a deferred compensation dollar account as described above, as an
appropriate means of preserving the benefits intended to be provided to me by
the Plan.

                                       Very truly yours,


                                       /s/ Dennis G. Heiner
                                       -------------------------
                                       Dennis G. Heiner
Anthony GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 221 

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of the Cinco de Mayo 

holiday. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2021 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the cultural and historical significance of the 

Cinco de Mayo holiday. 

Whereas May 5, or ‘‘Cinco de Mayo’’ in Spanish, is celebrated each year as a date of importance by Mexican and 

Mexican-American communities; 

Whereas the Cinco de Mayo holiday commemorates May 5, 

1862, the date on which Mexicans defeated the French 

at the Battle of Puebla, one of the many battles that the 

Mexican people won in their long and brave fight for 

independence, freedom, and democracy; 

Whereas the victory of Mexico over France at Puebla represented a historic triumph for the Mexican government 

during the Franco-Mexican war fought between 1861 and 

1867 and bolstered the resistance movement; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 221 IS 

Whereas the success of Mexico at the Battle of Puebla reinvigorated the spirits of the Mexican people and provided 

a renewed sense of unity and strength; 

Whereas the French army, which had not experienced defeat 

against any of the finest troops of Europe in more than 

half a century, sustained a disastrous loss at the hands 

of an outnumbered and ill-equipped, but highly spirited 

and courageous, Mexican army; 

Whereas the courageous spirit that Mexican General Ignacio 

Zaragoza and his men displayed during that historic battle can never be forgotten; 

Whereas, in a larger sense, Cinco de Mayo symbolizes the 

right of a free people to self-determination, just as Benito 

Juarez, the president of Mexico during the Battle of 

Puebla, once said, ‘‘El respeto al derecho ajeno es la 

paz’’, meaning ‘‘respect for the rights of others is peace’’; 

Whereas the sacrifice of Mexican fighters was instrumental in 

keeping Mexico from falling under European domination 

while, in the United States, the Union Army battled Confederate forces in the Civil War; 

Whereas Cinco de Mayo serves as a reminder that the foundation of the United States was built by people from 

many countries and diverse cultures who were willing to 

fight and die for freedom; 

Whereas Cinco de Mayo also serves as a reminder of the close 

ties between the people of Mexico and the people of the 

United States; 

Whereas Cinco de Mayo encourages the celebration of a legacy of strong leaders and a sense of vibrancy in communities; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 221 IS 

Whereas Cinco de Mayo serves as a reminder to provide more 

opportunity for future generations: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the historic struggle of the people 

3 of Mexico for independence and freedom, which 

4 Cinco de Mayo commemorates; and 

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

6 to observe Cinco de Mayo with appropriate cere7 monies and activities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

A      signed      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided      to      Osage Exploration and Development, Inc. and will be retained by Osage      Exploration and Development, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange      Commission or its staff upon request.

|                                                    |                                   |                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March                31,                2008 | By:                          | /s/                *Ran                Furman* |
|                                                    | Ran                Furman              |
|                                                    | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lawrence Weisdorn, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:  March 30, 2009  /s/ LAWRENCE WEISDORNLawrence Weisdorn
Principal Financial Officer
Sam STROTHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3124

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 11, 2016

No. 04-15-00362-CV

Javan P. SMITH,

Appellant

v.

DC CIVIL CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CV-01978

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 18, 2016. Appellant, who is pro se, has 

been granted one extension of time in which to file the brief, until April 28, 2016. Neither the 

brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant

file his brief no later than May 31, 2016. If appellant fails to file the brief by this date or fails to 

reasonably explain the reason for his failure to do so, this appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); 42.3(b),(c).

The Clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on appellant by 

certified mail, return receipt requested, and by United States mail. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of May, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
ANTONIO EMMANUEL 

MOORER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4056

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Ross Goodman, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
Stanley R. PALOWSKY, III, Individually, and on Behalf of Alternative Environmental Solutions, Inc. v. Allyson CAMPBELL, et al.

NO. 2018-C-1105

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

CLARK, J., recused.
# L_2017081EN.01001501.xml

| 28.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 81/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/15

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/597

of 15 March 2017

approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Estepa (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Estepa’, registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 900/2010 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Estepa’, registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 900/2010 (2).

| (2) | Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.

| (3) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Estepa’ (PDO) are hereby approved.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 March 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 900/2010 of 8 October 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Estepa (PDO)) (OJ L 266, 9.10.2010, p. 52).

2

(3)  
  OJ C 453, 3.12.2016, p. 14.

3

---
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Jeffrey Markin, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Jeffrey MarkinJeffrey
      MarkinPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerNovember
      13, 2009





This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Johnny BROWN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1883

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vision Industries Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2013. The undersigned certifies that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of December 31, 2013.  This Certification is executed as of April 15, 2014 VISION INDUSTRIES CORP. By:/s/MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
Secretary, Treasurer,  and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  By:/s/DAVID MORENODavid Moreno
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.