alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**     The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this Annual Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certificationsshall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ BRIAN E. FARLEY     Brian E. Farley  *President, Chief Executive Officer and Director*  *(Principal Executive Officer)*     Dated: March 14, 2006       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ TIMOTHY A. MARCOTTE     Timothy A. Marcotte  V*ice President and Chief Financial Officer*  *(Principal Financial Officer)*     Dated: March 14, 2006       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
William KEMPTON, Appellant, v. Lawrence MCCOMB, Gregory Davis and Marianne Carter, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-1021

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

Matthew G. Struble and Christine D. Skubala, of Struble, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Angela C. Flowers, of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Ocala, for Appellee, Lawrence McComb.

David C. Knapp and James A. Coleman, of James A. Coleman, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Marianne Carter.

No Appearance for Appellee, Gregory Davis.

PER CURIAM.

William Kempton appeals the trial court's order awarding attorney's fees and costs to Lawrence McComb, pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2015), and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. The award of attorney's fees and costs was *273based on the trial court's entry of a final judgment in favor of Mr. McComb after applying section 768.36, Florida Statutes (2015), to completely bar recovery by Mr. Kempton. We recently reversed the final judgment in favor of Mr. McComb with directions to enter a final judgment awarding damages to Mr. Kempton in accordance with the jury's apportionment of fault. *See* *Kempton v. McComb*, 264 So.3d 1180, 2019 WL 982849 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 1, 2019).

Given our reversal of the final judgment, we must reverse the trial court's order awarding attorney's fees and costs in Mr. McComb's favor. *See* *Hodge v. Cichon*, 79 So.3d 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (reversing order granting attorney's fees pursuant to section 768.79 where appellate court reversed trial court's order granting final summary judgment in favor of appellees); *City of Hollywood v. Witt*, 939 So.2d 315, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ("[W]here an award of attorney's fees is dependent upon the judgment obtained, the reversal of the underlying judgment necessitates the reversal of the fee award.").

REVERSED.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Artie PERKINS, a/k/a Carl Allen, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4559

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

Artie Perkins, a/k/a Carl Allen, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Linsey Sims-Bohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Stace E. MCCOMB, a/k/a Stace Edward McComb & Laurie McComb, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michael D. GOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-108

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
PEOPLE'S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. James G. CASSOS and Deborah Cassos, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Nau SANDOVAL SUAREZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-2056

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
Tyrone BLACKSHEAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3101

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10 (xiii)



 Exhibit 10(xiii) 
 January 2, 2009 
 Mr. Robert J. Lawless 
 CKB Consulting LLC 
 23641 Waterside Drive 
 Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 
 Dear Bob: 
 As we have discussed, I would like to extend the term of the Consulting Agreement dated as of January 1, 2007 between McCormick and CKB Consulting LLC (the “Agreement”) for another year. 
 During the renewal term, which will begin on January 1, 2009 and end on December 31, 2009, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement
will remain in effect, except for the payment of a consulting fee, which you have generously offered to waive for 2009. We will, of course, continue to reimburse you for all reasonable expenses for travel, food and lodging. 
 I am very pleased that you have expressed an interest in continuing to serve as my advisor for an additional year. I look forward to continuing our
relationship. 
 If the terms of this letter acceptable to you, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided and return
the same to me. 
  

	
	Sincerely yours,
	
	 /s/ Alan D. Wilson

	Alan D. Wilson


 Accepted and approved this 8th 
 day of January, 2009. 
  

			
	CKB CONSULTING LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert J. Lawless

		 	Robert J. Lawless
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** Regardless of their caption, because Doublin is in custody, his pleadings sound under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and not as an application for writ of error coram nobis. See Correa-Negron v. United States , 473 F.2d 684, 685 (5th Cir. 1973).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30236 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LARRY W. DOUBLIN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-30024-5

- - - - - - - - - - May 18, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Larry W. Doublin, federal prisoner No. 09044-035, requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion ** for failure to comply with a court order and he requests that this court appoint anNo. 98-30236 - 2 - attorney to represent him on appeal. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. The record shows that Doublin timely complied with the court’s order to file an affidavit in support of his argument for an out-of-time appeal by attaching the affidavit to a pleading filed in the district court on October 30, 1997. Thus, the district court erred by dismissing his motion for failure to comply with the court’s order. Sonnier v. Johnson , 161 F.3d 941, 943 (5th Cir. 1998). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of Doublin’s substantive habeas claims because the district court did not consider whether a COA should be granted on those issues. See Whitehead v. Johnson , 157 F.3d 384, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, we GRANT a COA and VACATE AND REMAND to the district court for consideration of Doublin’s affidavit. COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
# L_2017179DE.01004101.xml

| 12.7.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 179/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 179/41

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2017/573 der Kommission vom 6. Juni 2016 zur Ergänzung der Richtlinie 2014/65/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über Märkte für Finanzinstrumente durch technische Regulierungsstandards für Anforderungen zur Sicherstellung gerechter und nichtdiskriminierender Kollokationsdienste und Gebührenstrukturen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 87 vom 31. März 2017
  )

Seite 146, Artikel 1 Absatz 1 Buchstabe c:

Anstatt:

„hinsichtlich der Organisation der Ausführungsinfrastruktur des Handelsplatzes sowie des Nahzugangs“

muss es heißen:

„hinsichtlich der Organisation der Ausführungsinfrastruktur des Handelsplatzes sowie des Proximity-Zugangs“.

Seite 147, Artikel 4:

Anstatt:

„Die Handelsplätze veröffentlichen die objektiven Kriterien für die Festlegung ihrer Gebühren und Gebührenstrukturen sowie weitere Bedingungen laut Artikel 3 zusammen mit Ausführungsgebühren, Nebengebühren positiven und negativen Anreizen in einem umfassenden und öffentlich zugänglichen Dokument auf ihrer Webseite.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Handelsplätze veröffentlichen die objektiven Kriterien für die Festlegung ihrer Gebühren und Gebührenstrukturen sowie weitere Bedingungen nach Artikel 3 zusammen mit Ausführungsgebühren, Nebengebühren, Rabatten sowie positiven und negativen Anreizen in einem umfassenden und öffentlich zugänglichen Dokument auf ihrer Webseite.“

---
Case 3:05-cr-00294-JL Document 7 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the Annual Report of Champps Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2007 (the Report), I, Michael P.
ODonnell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: September 6, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael P. ODonnell
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Michael P. ODonnell                 
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not be deemed filed by this Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 11071 C onfer enc e Cal endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. ANDRE L AM AR C OLL I ER, D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he N or t her n D i st r i c tof Texas U SDC N o . 1 : 0 8

- CR- 3 1

- ALL

B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * A p p ea l i n g th e j u d gm en t i n a crim i n a l ca se, A n d re L a m a r C oll i er p rese n ts
ar gum ent s t hat ar e f or ec l os ed by Un i t ed S t ate s v. Harri m on , 568 F. 3d 531, 532 (5 th C ir.20 0 9 ), w h ich h e ld th a t a v iola tion of T EXAS P ENAL C ODE § 3 8 .0 4 (b )(1 ) is
a v i o l e n t fe l o n y f

o r p u r p o s e s o f t h e Ar m e d Ca r e e r Cr i m i n a l Ac t , a nd Un it ed S t a t e s v . B r o wn , 9 2 0 F .2 d 1 2 1 2 , 1 2 1 6

- 1 7 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ), ab rogate don ot h er gr ounds by Un itedS ta tes v. C a n d ia , 454 F
. 3d 468 , 472

- 73 (5t h C i r. 200 6) , w h i ch h e ld th a t a d is tr ic t c o u r t m a y o r d e ra t e r m o f im p r is o n m e n t t o ru n co n s e c u tiv e ly United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 11071

2 t o an u n im p o sed st ate s en t en ce. Th e G overnm en t ’ s m ot i on f or s u m m ary a f f i r ma n c e i s GR ANT ED , a n d t h e j u d g me n t o f t h e d i s t r i c tc o u r ti s A F F I RMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, W.Bradley Blair, II, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GTA-IB, LLC;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| May 15, 2006 |   | /s/ W. Bradley Blair, II            |   |
|--------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|         |   | W. Bradley Blair, II                |
|         |   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Kerri L. SCARRY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Duncan J. SCARRY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-5057

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 01, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                Drug Shortages

Drug Shortages

                        Drug Shortages | Additional News and Information
          Frequently Asked Questions about Drug Shortages
          Drug Shortages Infographic Home
          Drugs
          Drug Safety and Availability
          Drug Shortages
          Drug Shortages InfographicDrug Shortages Drug Shortages Infographic
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintText Version: Drug Shortages Infographic



Drug Shortages Infographic

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      12/12/2022
              
              
Regulated Product(s)
		 DrugsDrug Shortages

          
                        Drug Shortages | Additional News and Information
          Frequently Asked Questions about Drug Shortages
          Drug Shortages Infographic
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10279]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

Title; Applicable Form; and OMB Control Number: Individual MCJROTC 
Instructor Evaluation Summary; NAVMC 10942; OMB Control Number 0703-
0016.
Type of Request: Reinstatement.
Number of Respondents: 240.
Responses Per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 240.
Average Burden Per Response: 30 minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 120.
Needs And Uses: The information collected hereby, provides an 
evaluation, as well as a written record of, the overall effectiveness 
and performance of Marine instructors who are significantly responsible 
for implementing the Marine Corps Junior Reserve Officers' Training 
Corps (MCJROTC) program.
Affected Public: Individuals of households; Businesses or other for-
profit.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.

    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.

DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.

    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: April 20, 1995.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 95-10279 Filed 4-26-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Willie Charles CARPENTER, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2947

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.