alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mesrop MARTIROSYAN, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 98-70979.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed June 14, 2001

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, WALLACE, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, McKEOWN, RONALD M. GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On March 13, 2001, upon a vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, we ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.1 By the same order, we directed that the three-judge panel opinion, *Martirosyan v. INS,*229 F.3d 903 (9th Cir.2000), “shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.” *See*242 F.3d 905, 905 (9th Cir.2001).

On March 20, 2001, we received a letter from petitioner Mesrop Martirosyan’s counsel of record, Louis A. Gordon, who advised this court that he had lost contact with Martirosyan and was unable to locate his client. Counsel requested clarification from the en banc court on how to proceed.

On April 17, 2001, Chief Judge Schroeder ordered Martirosyan personally to inform this court in writing within 21 days of his intent to continue with this proceeding, and advised Martirosyan that his failure to so inform the court would result in the automatic dismissal of his petition for review for failure to prosecute. Both counsel Gordon and the INS counsel of record were instructed to serve a copy of the April 17 order on Martirosyan at his last known addresses. This court also sent a copy of the April 17 order directly to Mar-tirosyan at his last known address.

On April 24, 2001, the INS informed this court that it had served a copy of the April 17 order on Martirosyan at his last known address. Counsel Gordon advised this court on May 4, 2001 that he had served a copy of the April 17 order, by certified mail, on Martirosyan at his last known address.

*477As of today’s date, Martirosyan has failed to respond to the April 17 order. Accordingly, the petition for review is DISMISSED for failure to comply with this court’s April 17 order. *See*9th Cir. Rule 42-1 (“When an appellant fails to ... file a timely brief, or otherwise comply with rules requiring processing the appeal for hearing, an order may be entered by the clerk dismissing the appeal.”). The En Banc oral argument set for June 19, 2001 at 2:00 p.m. in San Francisco is VACATED. The three-judge panel opinion reported at 229 F.3d 903 (9th Cir.2000) is VACATED and WITHDRAWN from publication.

1

. Judge Fisher was recused.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cono Italiano, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mitchell Brown, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:
 
 (1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date:
November 15, 2010
  By:
                /s/ Mitchell BrownName:   
      Mitchell BrownTitle:     
      Principal Executive
Officer
Mervin G. RHODES Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2890

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 11, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02487]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12653]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Line, Form, Qi: Calligraphic 
Art From the Fondation INK'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Line, Form, Qi: Calligraphic Art 
from the Fondation INK'' at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los 
Angeles, California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that 
their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 
11, 2015.

Rafik K. Mansour,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2025-02487 Filed 2-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications**I, Corey A. Chambas, Chief Executive Officer of First Business Financial Services, Inc., certifythat: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Business Financial Services, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ Corey A. Chambas         Corey A. Chambas
Exhibit 36

- Filed Under Seal -

Case 5:17-cv-00551-LHK Document 285-37 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 1
STATE of Louisiana v. Elbert CHINN

No. 2018-KH-1505

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 08-6437; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 18-KH-379

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Applicant's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of *1268the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0022

IN THE MATTER OF:

M.Z.L.,

A YOUTH IN NEED OF CARE.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kim Marchwick is 

granted an extension of time to and including March 29, 2023, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

No further extensions will be granted.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 27 2023

02/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0022
|Exhibit
  32.2
|--------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
      TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Xiaoling Chen, Chief Accounting Officer Secretary of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Xiaoling
      ChenXiaoling ChenChief
      Accounting Officer and SecretaryMay 12,
      2006
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Alexandra MORALES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1529

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 1 of 25 PageID 1795
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 2 of 25 PageID 1796
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 3 of 25 PageID 1797
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 4 of 25 PageID 1798
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 5 of 25 PageID 1799
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 6 of 25 PageID 1800
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 7 of 25 PageID 1801
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 8 of 25 PageID 1802
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 9 of 25 PageID 1803
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 10 of 25 PageID 1804
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 11 of 25 PageID 1805
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 12 of 25 PageID 1806
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 13 of 25 PageID 1807
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 14 of 25 PageID 1808
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 15 of 25 PageID 1809
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 16 of 25 PageID 1810
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 17 of 25 PageID 1811
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 18 of 25 PageID 1812
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 19 of 25 PageID 1813
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 20 of 25 PageID 1814
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 21 of 25 PageID 1815
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 22 of 25 PageID 1816
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 23 of 25 PageID 1817
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 24 of 25 PageID 1818
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 45 Filed 04/17/08 Page 25 of 25 PageID 1819
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED 

TERMINAL, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-07014-VC 

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES

Re: Dkt. No. 204

This litigation presented several difficult questions about whether communications 

involving the City's consultant, Environmental Science Associates, are subject to attorney-client 

privilege and/or protected as attorney work product. Some of those questions are still pending in 

the form of discovery disputes between the parties. The Court has now ruled in favor of OBOT 

on its breach of contract claim, rendering these disputes moot for the purposes of this litigation. 

Accordingly, all pending discovery requests by OBOT are denied.

In the event another dispute arises between the parties under the development agreement, 

and in the event that dispute is assigned to this Court, the parties should be aware that the Court 

will not treat its prior discovery-related rulings in this case as precedential. The Court will take a 

renewed look at the circumstances in which a city may cloak communications involving outside 

consultants by invoking attorney-client privilege and work product protection.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 15, 2018

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 607 

Supporting the designation of the week of May 1, 2022, as ‘‘Children’s 

Mental Health Awareness Week’’ and May 5, 2022, as ‘‘Children’s Mental Health Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2022 

Mr. KING (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 

Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of the week of May 1, 2022, 

as ‘‘Children’s Mental Health Awareness Week’’ and May 

5, 2022, as ‘‘Children’s Mental Health Awareness Day’’. 

Whereas children in the United States were already experiencing a public health crisis of mental and behavioral 

health before the additional challenges of the COVID–19 

pandemic; 

Whereas a 2013 report from the Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention estimated that mental disorders affect between 13 and 20 percent of children each year and cost 

$247,000,000,000 annually; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 607 IS 

Whereas the National Institute of Mental Health estimates 

that nearly 1⁄2 of adolescents (49.5 percent of the population aged 13 to 18) will experience a mental disorder; 

Whereas, in 2019, according to the Census Bureau, over 11 

percent of children aged 3 to 17 received treatment or 

counseling from a mental health professional; 

Whereas suicide is the third leading cause of death for youth 

aged 10 to 24, and 90 percent of youth suicide deaths 

involve an underlying mental illness; 

Whereas, during the COVID–19 pandemic, increased isolation and collective trauma has led to an increase in demand for mental health services for children; 

Whereas, compared with 2019, the proportion of visits of 

children to emergency rooms for concerns relating to 

mental health increased between approximately 24 and 

31 percent; 

Whereas the COVID–19 pandemic has laid bare the inequities in the mental health delivery system for all populations in the United States, specifically impacting children and adults who have been exposed to adverse childhood experiences; and 

Whereas the stigma surrounding mental and behavioral 

health persists, and acknowledging this public health crisis and creating awareness as early as possible is as important as ever: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of connecting 

3 children with appropriate mental and behavioral 

4 health services and supports; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 607 IS 

1 (2) seeks to create awareness for the additional 

2 challenges children and their families have faced 

3 during the COVID–19 pandemic due to isolation 

4 from family and peers, barriers to services, and ex5 posure to traumas; 

6 (3) supports programs and services aimed at 

7 expanding access to care, building resiliency, and ad8 dressing trauma; and 

9 (4) shows appreciation and gratitude for family 

10 members, friends, educators, mental and behavioral 

11 health service providers, and others in their support 

12 for the mental health and well-being of children. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Anthony T. WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3368

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITP Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Manfredi Mazziotti di Celso, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  August 19, 2011
/s/ Manfredi Mazziotti di CelsoManfredi Mazziotti di CelsoChief Executive Officer
# m8635.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.10.2017 C(2017) 7307 final To the Notifying Parties Subject : Case M. 8635 - SOJITZ / KEPCO/ LURICAWNE / FIXARRA / EVALAIR / PLUM Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 29 September 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Sojitz Corporation (" Sojitz ", Japan) and Kansai Electric Power Company Inc. ("KEPCO", Japan) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Evalair and Plum, together with Fixarra and Luricawne . The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: – Sojitz : t he Sojitz group is a global conglomerate active in a variety of different businesses, primarily in the area of trading of goods and services , including in the energy sector; – KEPCO : t he KEPCO group is active in various businesses including electric power, gas supply and telecommunications worldwide; – Luricawne : Luricawne is owned by HgCapital which is a mid-market private equity firm investing across technology, media, telecommunications, services and industrials, primarily in Northern Europe ; – Fixarra : Fixarra is owned by t he Craydel Group which is a multi-disciplinary engineering provider specialis ing in the developme nt of renewable energy projects; – Evalair owns and operates four windfarms in Ireland; – Plum owns the Slivecallan West Wind project in Ireland, which is a windfarm currently in development. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 339 , 10.10.2017 , p. 23 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .