alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2









Exhibit 10.2




SECOND AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     This SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is executed this 27th day of
January, 2009 by and between AXS-One Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Joseph P.
Dwyer (the “Employee”).



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of
February 15, 2007 and a First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of August 12, 2008
(collectively, the “Agreement”) under which the Company retained the Employee to serve as Executive
Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company; and



     WHEREAS, the parties wish to effect a temporary reduction in the base salary of the Employee
during calendar year 2009.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for other good
and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Employee
hereby agree as follows:



     1. Notwithstanding the terms of Section 4 of the Agreement regarding base salary payments to
the Employee, the parties agree to proceed in accordance with the provisions of the Temporary
Salary Adjustment Rider attached hereto as Exhibit A.



     2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and
effect. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original
and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement. Delivery of signature by facsimile
or other means of electronic image transmission shall be valid and binding for all purposes.



[signature page follows]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to Employment
Agreement on the year and date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AXS-ONE INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ William P. Lyons
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	William P. Lyons 	 
	 	 	Title:  	CEO 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	       /s/ Joseph P. Dwyer
 	 
	 	Joseph P. Dwyer 	 
	 	 	 



-2-









 






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit A




Temporary Salary Adjustment Rider



Employee agrees to a reduction in his annual base salary for the calendar year 2009 from $250,000
to $225,000. Salary payments for the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 will be made
in equal installments to the extent practicable, less all required withholding, in accordance with
the Company’s standard payroll practices. Effective January 1, 2010, assuming the Employee remains
in the Company’s employ, the Employee’s annual salary will revert to the prior annual rate of
$250,000, unless mutually agreed otherwise.



Should the Employee’s employment relationship with the Company terminate during calendar year 2009
under circumstances whereby the Employee would be entitled to payments set forth in Sections 9 or
10 of the Agreement any such payments based upon base salary will be calculated based upon the
Employee’s annual base salary rate of $250,000 per year.




-3-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

_____________________________________________________________________________

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW DEFENDANT SERGIY KIYANICHENKO TO FILE

FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

David H. Dicker, Esq. (SBN 180182)

DICKER & DICKER, Attorneys at Law

16530 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 609

Encino, California 91436

Tel: (818) 788-3381

Fax: (818) 971-3747

Attorney for Defendant, Sergiy G. Kiyanichenko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDAPS CONSORTIUM, a business entity

under Ukrainian law,

Plaintiff,

v.

SERGIY G. KIYANICHENKO, AKA

SERGIY G. KYANYCHENKO, an individual,

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants. ________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: C05-01931WHA

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW

DEFENDANT SERGIY

KIYANICHENKO TO FILE FIRST

AMENDED ANSWER TO

COMPLAINT

Having reviewed the Stipulation among the Parties, and Good Cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant SERGIY G. KIYANICHENKO, AKA

SERGIY G. KYANYCHENKO is granted leave of court to file his First Amended Answer

to Complaint.

Dated:__________________ _____________________________________

WILLIAM ALSUP

United States District Court Judge

September 2, 2005

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-01931-WHA Document 40 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 1
[Regulus Logo] **Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance****with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**1.Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 -- Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. 229.1100- 229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively " Regulus"), is responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria a pplicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and who have requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is a service whereby check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office box are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of the payment. 2.The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the Platform (such criteria the " Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria. 3.As of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, Regulus has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB. /s/ Kimberlee Clark****Kimberlee Clark Chief Financial Officer February 15, 2008
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 400 

Designating September 2021 as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. REED, Mrs. 

CAPITO, Mr. CASEY, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. HAWLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2021 as ‘‘National Childhood Cancer 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas each year more than 15,500 children under the age 

of 19 in the United States are diagnosed with cancer; 

Whereas every year more than 1,700 children in the United 

States lose their lives to cancer; 

Whereas childhood cancer is the leading cause of death from 

disease and the second overall leading cause of death for 

children in the United States; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for children with cancer has 

increased from 58 percent in the mid-1970s to 84 percent in 2020, representing significant improvement from 

previous decades; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 400 IS 

Whereas more than 2⁄3 of children who survive cancer will develop at least 1 chronic health condition, and many survivors will face a late-effect from treatment that could be 

considered severe or life-threatening; 

Whereas cancer patients face a higher risk of contracting the 

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19) due to weakened 

immune systems; and 

Whereas cancer occurs regularly and randomly and spares no 

racial or ethnic group, socioeconomic class, or geographic 

region: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2021 as ‘‘National 

3 Childhood Cancer Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) requests that the Federal Government, 

5 States, localities, and nonprofit organizations ob6 serve the month with appropriate programs and ac7 tivities, with the goal of increasing public knowledge 

8 of the risks of cancer; 

9 (3) encourages survivors of childhood cancer to 

10 continue to receive ongoing monitoring and physical 

11 and psychosocial care throughout their adult lives; 

12 (4) recognizes the human toll of cancer and 

13 pledges to make the prevention and cure of cancer 

14 a public health priority; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 400 IS 

1 (5) reminds the people of the United States 

2 that these children are the definition of bravery, and 

3 commends and honors their courage. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL L. HOWARD,

Petitioner,

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Respondent.

Case No. 16-cv-07117-VC (PR)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AS 

DUPLICATIVE

On December 14, 2016, Daniel Howard filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 

The face of the petition indicates that Howard has a pending federal petition challenging the 

same state court criminal judgment titled, Howard v. People of the State of California, 16-cv4759 NJV (PR). Therefore, this petition is dismissed as duplicative. In case number 16-cv-4759 

NJV (PR), Howard may bring a motion to amend to include any claims in this petition that he 

has not alleged in that petition.

All pending motions in this case shall be administratively terminated. The Clerk of the 

Court shall close this case and file a copy of this Order in case number 16-cv-4759 NJV (PR).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

February 28, 2017

Case 3:16-cv-07117-VC Document 11 Filed 02/28/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ROBERT M. BOCHTER, II; MATTHEW 

PASQUINELLI; VENTURE ENERGY 

SOLUTIONS, LLC; AND CONFLUENCE 

ENERGY CONSULTANTS, LLC, 

 Petitioners 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 432 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 29, 2016

d0922

Order 

Clerk

September 29, 2016

153021 & (21)

SPENCER B. GUPPY, a minor, by his

Next Friend PAULA J. GUPPY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153021

COA: 328889

Kent CC: 14-003811-NO

WYOMING COMMUNITY CHURCH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should now be reviewed by this Court. 

The stay of trial court proceedings, ordered on August 17, 2016 is DISSOLVED.
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Tian Ling, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xinyinhai Technology, Ltd.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: November 17, 2006 /s/ Tian Ling Tian Ling, Chief Executive Officer
Martin MAHON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1073

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Tagalder Global Investment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Chun Ka Tsun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Chun Ka TsunChun Ka Tsun, Chief Financial Officer May 8, 2007
EXHIBIT 15(b)






TXU Electric Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Electric Company (formerly
Texas Utilities Electric Company) and subsidiaries (TXU Electric) for
the periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, as indicated in our report dated
August 12, 1999; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU
Electric's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999,
is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-69554 and
333-42985 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No. 33-83976 on Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3, of TXU Electric.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
August 12, 1999
Robert Evans LEWIS III v. STATE

CR-17-0227

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cono Italiano, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mitchell Brown, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
September 14, 2009




By:
              /s/ Mitchell BrownName:   
      Mitchell BrownTitle:     
      Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc. as managing member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC, certify that (i) the Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 of
TriView Global Fund, LLC fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2006
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of TriView Global Fund, LLC.


TRIVIEW GLOBAL FUND, LLC
By:	TriView Capital Management, Inc., Managing Member


By: /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:	November 20, 2006
Justin Tavarse BARGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3718

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optionable, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc-Andre Boisseau Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|             |  |                        
|------------ |  | -----------------------
|May 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc-Andre Boisseau
|             |  | Marc-Andre Boisseau    
|             |  | Chief Financial Officer

---
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 7 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving 

the Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2021 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. INHOFE, and 

Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council 

in approving the Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress disapproves of the action of the District 

4 of Columbia Council described as follows: The Minor Con5 sent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Act 

6 23–532), enacted by the District of Columbia Council on 

7 December 23, 2020, and transmitted to Congress pursuVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:14 Feb 09, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ7.IS SJ7

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 7 IS 

1 ant to section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home 

2 Rule Act on February 4, 2021. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5040 September Term, 2022

1:22-cv-03753-UNA

Filed On: June 16, 2023

Loretta Jean Alford,

Appellant

v.

Jeffrey Koses, Chairman, Committee for

Purchase/AbilityOne, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Millett and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s February 7, 2023, order be

affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s case without prejudice for

failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). Appellant’s complaint did

not set forth “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is

entitled to relief,” which is required in order to “give the defendant fair notice of what the

claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” Jones v. Kirchner, 835 F.3d 74, 79 (D.C.

Cir. 2016) (citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 23-5040 September Term, 2022

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P.

41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2