alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER OF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LPPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for three months ended June 30,2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Randy Moeder, Chief Executive Officer and President ofHiland Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Partners, LP (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.            The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 11, 2006 |   | /s/ Randy Moeder                      |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Randy Moeder                          |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         318,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,408,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (36,926)
<INVENTORY>                                    972,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,158,523
<PP&E>                                      12,871,308
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,581,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,273,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,820,539
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    203,580
<COMMON>                                       407,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,790,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,273,620
<SALES>                                      4,246,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,298,524
<CGS>                                        2,763,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,795,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               192,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                203,384
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203,384
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Michael C. ESSIX, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. William HAMILTON, Warden, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1898

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32 TO FORM 10-KSB

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned  hereby  certifies  that, to his or her knowledge,  (i) the
Form 10-KSB filed by Four Oaks Fincorp,  Inc. (the "Issuer") for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and (ii) the  information
contained  in  that  report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for
the periods presented therein.

     A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 has been provided to the Issuer and will retained by
the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.



    Date:   March 24, 2004                      By:   /s/ Ayden R. Lee, Jr.
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Ayden R. Lee, Jr.
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


    Date:   March 24, 2004                       By:   /s/ Nancy S. Wise
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Nancy S. Wise
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

     This  Certification  is being  furnished  solely to  accompany  the  Report
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed  "filed" by the  Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and
shall not be  incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended,  whether made before or after the date of this Report,  irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  documents  authenticating,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ALEXIS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 542 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
MIAMI SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1146

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
2174 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 1995 / Notices

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Kimberly M. White,

Corporate Technician.

[FR Doc. 95–279 Filed 1–5–95; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720–01–M

Standard Federal Savings, FSA

Gaithersburg, MD: Notice of

Appointment of Receiver

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant

to the authority contained in § 5(d)(2) of

the Home Owners’ Loan Act, the Office

of Thrift Supervision has duly

appointed the Resolution Trust

Corporation as sole Receiver for

Standard, Federal Savings, FSA,

Gaithersburg, Maryland, on November

18, 1994.

Dated: December 30, 1994.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Kimberly M. White,

Corporate Technician.

[FR Doc. 94–277 Filed 1–5–94; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720–01–M
Wendall HALL, Appellant, v. Gail Durand CLARKE, RN and Karen Blankenship, ARNP, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-2805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIM S. KING, 

Plaintiff,

 v.

RODERICK HICKMAN, ARNOLD

SCHWARZENEGGER,

Defendants. _______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 05-1856 JSW (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On December 23, 2005, the Court dismissed the complaint in this civil rights case

but granted Plaintiff thirty days to amend the complaint to state a cognizable claim. The

court notified Plaintiff that failure to amend by the designated time would result in a

dismissal of the case. Plaintiff has not filed any amendment. Accordingly, this case is

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court order

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S.

626, 633 (1962); McKeever v. Block, 932 F.2d 795, 797 (9th Cir. 1991). The clerk shall

close the file and enter judgment in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 20, 2006

 JEFFREY S. WHITE

 United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01856-JSW Document 6 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1   ELITE ARTZ, INC.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officers of Elite Artz Inc. (the "Company") certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (a)     the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b)     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:   August 8, 2006             /s/ David Oman ____________________________________ David Oman Chief Executive and Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00258-CV

In re Roberto Gomez Fernandez

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Roberto Gomez Fernandez, an inmate, has filed a pro se petition for writ of

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221. In the petition, Fernandez asks this Court

to compel the presiding judge of the 167th Judicial District Court of Travis County to answer his

request for a judgment nunc pro tunc modifying his judgment of conviction. Tex. Code Crim. Proc.

art. 42.03 § 2(a).

Mandamus may issue to compel a trial court to respond to a motion for judgment

nunc pro tunc. Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148-49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). However, to

obtain mandamus relief compelling the trial court to rule on a motion, the relator must establish

that (1) a properly filed motion has been pending for unreasonable amount of time, (2) the matter

was brought to the attention of the trial court, and (3) the trial court failed or refused to rule on the

motion. In re Layton, 257 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, orig. proceeding). Further,

it is the relator’s burden to properly request and show entitlement to mandamus relief. Walker

v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). In this regard, the relator must provide the reviewing

court with a record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus relief. In re Mendoza, 131 S.W.3d
167, 168 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding); see Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1)

(requiring that relator file certified or sworn copy of every document material to claim for relief). 

Here, Fernandez has not provided this Court with a file-stamped copy of his motion

for judgment nunc pro tunc or any other document showing that his motion has been properly filed.

Without this record, we cannot determine whether the motion was properly filed or, if it was, the

date on which it was received by either the clerk’s office or the judge. In addition, Fernandez has

not provided this Court with any record demonstrating that his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc

has been brought to the trial court’s attention or that a ruling was requested. See In re Blakeney,

254 S.W.3d 659, 661 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, orig. proceeding) (relator must show that

trial court was aware of and asked to rule on motion).

Because Fernandez has failed to demonstrate his right to relief, the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Filed: June 4, 2014

2
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 21 (Monday, February 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8792-8793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02114]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE641]

Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Pacific Council) 
will convene an online meeting of its Ad Hoc Ecosystem Workgroup (EWG), 
which is open to the public.

DATES: The online meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 25, from 10 
a.m. to 1 p.m., Pacific Time, or until business for the day is 
completed.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held online. Specific meeting 
information, including directions on how to join the meeting and system 
requirements, will be provided in the meeting announcement on the 
Pacific Council's website (see www.pcouncil.org). You may send an email 
to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt ([email protected]) or contact him at 
(503) 820-2412 for technical assistance.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE 
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilly Lyons, Staff Officer, Pacific 
Council; telephone: (503) 820-2427.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of this online meeting 
is to provide a briefing for Pacific Council advisory body members and 
the public on the 2024-2025 California Current Ecosystem Status Report, 
which will be a topic on the Pacific Council's March 4-11, 2025 meeting 
agenda. In addition to providing this briefing, the EWG may discuss 
other items relevant to its work for the Pacific Council. A detailed 
meeting agenda will be available on the Pacific Council's website prior 
to the meeting.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may be discussed, those issues may not be the subject of formal action 
during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those issues 
specifically listed in this document and any issues arising after 
publication of this document that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of

[[Page 8793]]

the intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt 
([email protected]; (503) 820-2412) at least 10 days prior to 
the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 29, 2025.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-02114 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carbiz Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanton
C. Heintz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



| | /s/
      Stanton C. Heintz                 
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Stanton C. Heintz                           
| | Chief Financial Officer                     
| | (principal financial and accounting officer)
| | December 10, 2008                           

---
[Regulus Logo] **Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**1.Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100  Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. 229.1100- 229.1123 ("Regulation AB"), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively "Regulus"), is responsible for assessing its compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and who have requested confirmation of Regulus' compliance in connection with loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the "Platform"). Remittance processing is a service whereby check payments that are remitted by mail to a post office box are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of the payment. 2.The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used in Regulus' assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the Platform (such criteria the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria. 3.As of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, Regulus has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB. 4.KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Regulus' assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. A copy of that attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. /s/ Kimberlee ClarkKimberlee Clark Chief Financial Officer February 15, 2008 850  LATOU R COURT I  N A P A ,   C A   I   9 4 5 5 8   I   T E L :   7 0 7   2 5 4   4 0 0 0   I   F A X :   7 0 7   2 5 4   4 0 7 0   I     R E G U L U S G R O U P   C O M
**EXHIBIT
          32**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS
          UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY**
  In
        connection with the annual report of Eiger Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason
        Moretto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/_JASON
        MORETTO
 
 Name: Jason
        Moretto
 Title:
        Chief Financial Officer
 March
        27, 2007
PIER 5 LAW OFFICES

506 BROADW AY

SAN FRANCISCO

(415) 986-5591

FAX: (415) 421-1331

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

LESLIE JORDAN, 

Defendant.

 /

CR 05-292 MHP

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER TO CONTINUE PROBATION

VIOLATION HEARING 

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that the Probation

Violation Hearing, presently scheduled for February 13, 2006,

shall be continued to March 20, 2006, or to a date convenient to

the court and all parties. This continuance is requested so

that the retesting of the two positive drug screens can be

completed. 

Dated: February 8, 2006

 /S/ KAREN BEAUSEY /S/ RANDOLPH E. DAAR 

KAREN BEAUSEY RANDOLPH E. DAAR

Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

MARILYN HALL PATEL, Judge

United States District Court

Dated: 2/9/06

Case 3:05-cr-00292-MHP Document 58 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 1
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  Exhibit 4.3    
    


 
 

AGREEMENT OF SUBSTITUTION AND AMENDMENT OF RIGHTS
  AGREEMENT    



        This
Agreement of Substitution and Amendment is entered into as of January 20, 2009, by and between IHS, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company") and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC ("AST"). 


RECITALS 


	A.
	On
or about November 10, 2005, the Company entered into a Rights Agreements (the "Rights Agreement") with Computershare Trust Company, Inc.
(the "Predecessor Agent") as rights agent.



	B.
	The
Company wishes to remove the Predecessor Agent and substitute AST as rights agent pursuant to Section 19 of the Rights Agreement.



	C.
	The
Company has given the Predecessor Agent notice of removal of the Predecessor Agent as rights agent. 


AGREEMENT 


        NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of other consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as
follows: 


	1.
	The
Company hereby appoints AST as rights agent pursuant to Section 19 of the Rights Agreement, to serve in that capacity for the consideration and
subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Rights Agreement.



	2.
	AST
hereby accepts the appointment as rights agent pursuant to Section 19 of the Rights Agreement and agrees to serve in that capacity for the
consideration and subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Rights Agreement.



	3.
	From
and after the effective date hereof, each and every reference in the Rights Agreement to a "Rights Agent" shall be deemed to be a reference to AST.



	4.
	Section 23
of the Rights Agreement is amended to provide that notices or demands shall be addressed as follows (until another address is
filed):




			
	If to the Company:	 	IHS Inc.

15 Inverness Way East

Englewood, CO 80112

Attention: Mr. Stephen Green

Facsimile Number: (212) 850-8540
	
 If to AST:	
 	
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC

59 Maiden Lane

New York, NY 10038

Attention: Corporate Trust Department





	5.
	Except
as expressly modified herein, the Right Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



	6.
	This
Agreement of Substitution and Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall together constitute one and the same documents. 








        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date indicated above. 





					
	 	 	IHS Inc.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	/s/ M. Sean Radcliffe






  M. Sean Radcliffe

Vice President, Chief Legal Counsel—Corporate

Assistant Corporate Secretary
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST

COMPANY, LLC
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Paula Caroppoli






  Paula Caroppoli

Vice President
















QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.3


AGREEMENT OF SUBSTITUTION AND AMENDMENT OF RIGHTS AGREEMENT
Kenneth Wayne TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-1466

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.