alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Charles El-Moussa, President, Secretary and Treasurer of
Netfone, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Netfone, Inc. for the period
          ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Netfone, Inc.

Date: August 23, 2010


/s/ Charles El-Moussa
--------------------------------------------
Charles El-Moussa
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Martin Schuermann, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vision Industries Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:  March 30, 2009  /s/MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.7


 





 


KEY EMPLOYEE BONUS PLAN


 


Summary


 


The
Company provides an annual incentive bonus to those individuals who have been
identified as Key Employees (“KEP’s”). 
KEP participants are nominated by their respective executive officer
based on the guidelines provided below. 
The CEO has final authority over the list of each year’s participants
and their level of participation based.  Furthermore,
cash bonuses paid under the KEP Plan are subject to review by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and all equity grants of any
kind must be approved by the same committee. 
Finally, the total bonus pool distributed under the KEP Plan is subject
to the Company’s overall profitability.


 


There
are two levels of participation in the KEP Plan:  KEP and MVP. 
Participants at the KEP level will receive an annual cash incentive
bonus.  Participants at the MVP level are
eligible for a higher level of cash incentive bonus and equity grants most
likely in the form of restricted stock.  Sales
employees receiving any form of commissions are exempt from KEP nomination.


 


Guidelines
for Nomination as a KEP


 


A
nominee to participate in the KEP Plan will be a key influencer/leader in one
or more of the following areas:


 


·                  The
Company’s growth and/or profitability


·                  Employee
engagement


·                  The
employee effectively leads and motivates employees in his/her sphere of
influence


·                  The
experience of the customers – internal and external


·                  The
employee’s actions and attitudes consistently create a positive experience for
customers


 


A
nominee to participate in the KEP Plan will also:


 


·                  Consistently
live the Company’s Core Values;


·                  Perform
consistently above and beyond their responsibilities; and


·                  Have
a proven record of high performance.


 


Guidelines
for Nomination as an MVP


 


A
nominee to participate in the KEP Plan at the MVP level will:


 


·                  Qualify
as a KEP participant whose influence in the areas above is consistently and
significantly greater than most of his peers;


·                  Be
in the top 2% of all employees (non-Sales; non-Executive)


·                  Consistently
think “for the Company” rather than just for their functional area


·                  Consistently
solve significant problems, knock down barriers, and is a “go to” person to get
things done
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 536

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that President Vladimir Putin is a 
                             war criminal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2022

   Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Ms. Hassan) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that President Vladimir Putin is a 
                             war criminal.

Whereas, under international law, a war crime is a serious violation of the laws 
        or customs of war as defined by international customary law and 
        international treaties;
Whereas war crimes also include initiating a war of aggression as prosecuted at 
        the Nuremberg trials following World War II and more recently defined in 
        the 2010 amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal 
        Court;
Whereas a war criminal is a person who has planned, ordered, or carried out an 
        act during the conduct of a war that violates accepted international 
        rules of war; and
Whereas Articles 26 and 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, done 
        at Vienna May 23, 1969, state, ``Every treaty in force is binding upon 
        the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith. . . . A 
        party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification 
        for its failure to perform a treaty.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation has 
        committed war crimes as defined by the United Nations, the 
        International Criminal Court, and other international bodies 
        by--
                    (A) initiating an unprovoked war;
                    (B) violating the sovereignty of Ukraine 
                repeatedly;
                    (C) targeting civilian infrastructure, including 
                hospitals, schools, and apartment buildings, 
                militarily;
                    (D) targeting government facilities unrelated to 
                legitimate military objectives; and
                    (E) attempting to overthrow the democratically 
                elected government led by President Volodymyr Zelensky; 
                and
            (2) since President Vladimir Putin is the Commander in 
        Chief (equivalent) of the Armed Forces of the Russian 
        Federation and as such was involved in the planning of the 
        invasion of Ukraine, he is culpable of launching a war of 
        aggression and the systematic commission of war crimes during 
        that war by Russian troops.
                                 <all>
```
Shiny applications without Shiny

Emily Mitchell

October 25, 2018
The views expressed in this presentation are those of 

the author and no official endorsement by the 

Department of Health and Human Services, the Agency 

for Healthcare Research and Quality is intended or 

should be inferred.

Disclaimer
What is Shiny?
Motivation
Anatomy of a web page

HTML
Anatomy of a web page

HTML

JavaScript (JS)
Anatomy of a web page

Cascading Style Sheets (CSS)
Anatomy of a Shiny app

R – Shiny app
HTML

JavaScript (JS)

R – Shiny app

Anatomy of a Shiny app
1. Start with UI => HTML

2. Add JavaScript for reactivity

3. Add CSS (optional)

Tips for transitioning
1. Start with UI => HTML

HTML

R – Shiny app
2. Add JavaScript for reactivity

JavaScript (JQuery) R – Shiny app
3. Add CSS (optional)
Shiny vs. JavaScript

Shiny JavaScript

Statistical programming

Data manipulation

Learning curve

Trouble-shooting

Customization

Speed
You may want to transition if:

 You don’t really need R

 You use Shiny for display, not computation

 You write your own R functions to create UI objects

 You frequently use shinyBS and shinyJS packages, 

and find they don’t have all the features you want

 You are writing and embedding custom 

HTML/JS/CSS into your Shiny app
A happy medium?

Image credits: rstudio.com, deanattali.com/shinyjs/, ebailey78.github.io/shinyBS/

Style your apps with CSS

https://shiny.rstudio.com/articles/css.html

Customize your UI with HTML

https://shiny.rstudio.com/articles/html-tags.html

Build your entire UI with HTML

https://shiny.rstudio.com/articles/html-ui.html

How to create custom 

input bindings

https://shiny.rstudio.com/articles/js-custominput.html

Use R shiny as a server 

for JavaScript
Transition example

https://github.com/e-mitchell/Shiny_JS_transition

R – Shiny app HTML / JS
summary tables

https://github.com/HHS-AHRQ/MEPS-summary-tables
Resources

emily.mitchell@ahrq.hhs.gov

Shiny tutorials https://shiny.rstudio.com/articles

Learning HTML / CSS / JS coursera.org/specializations/web-design

w3schools.com

Bootstrap getbootstrap.com

US Web Design Standards 

(USWDS)

standards.usa.gov

Web Accessibility 

(508 compliance)

webaim.org
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**Rule 15d-14(d)**

I, Bryan Preston, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Fifth Third Auto Trust 2019-1 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 
 4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

 
 5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 
**

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association and The Bank of New York Mellon. 

March 25, 2022 

 
**Fifth Third Holdings Funding, LLC**, as DepositorBy: /s/ Bryan PrestonName: Bryan PrestonTitle: President(senior officer in charge of securitization)
 

 
*Certification pursuantto*

*Rule 15d-14(d) (FTAT 2019-1)*
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-31936]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[5129-7]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request 
(ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature 
of the information collection and its expected costs and burden; where 
appropriate, it includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 2, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For further information, or a copy of this ICR, contact Sandy Farmer at 
(202) 260-2740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Office of Air and Radiation

    Title: Natural Gas STAR Program (EPA ICR 1736.01). This ICR 
requests approval of a new collection.
    Abstract: Natural Gas STAR is an EPA-sponsored, voluntary program 
that encourages cost effective methods for reducing methane emissions 
from natural gas production, storage, transmission and distribution 
facilities. Participants develop a Memorandum of Understanding, develop 
an implementation plan, and report to EPA annually on progress towards 
meeting the goals identified in the implementation plan.
    Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
information is estimated to average 45 hours per response, including 
time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, 
gathering the data needed, and completing the collection of 
information.
    Respondents: natural gas production, storage, transmission and 
distribution companies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 70.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 3100 hours.
    Frequency of Collection: as needed.
    Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of 
this information collection, including suggestions for reducing the 
burden, to:

Sandy Farmer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Information Policy 
Branch (2136), 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460 and
Chris Wolz, Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: December 19, 1994.
Paul Lapsley,
Director, Regulatory, Management Division.
[FR Doc. 94-31936 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

REQUEST TO ATTEND SUBSEQUENT STATUS CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO. CV-01-20985 JF (RS) 

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 

Daniel J. Furniss (State Bar No. 073531) 

Anne M. Rogaski (State Bar No. 184754) amrogaski@townsend.com 

379 Lytton Avenue 

Palo Alto, California 94301 

Telephone: 650-326-2400 

Facsimile: 650-326-2422 

MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO P.C. 

David Barmak 

12010 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 900 

Reston, Virginia 20190 

Telephone: 703-464-4800 

Facsimile: 703-464-4895 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DIGEX, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

JULIE WHITE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DIGEX, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

 Case No. CV-01-20985 JF (RS) 

REQUEST TO ATTEND 

SUBSEQUENT STATUS 

CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE 

AND ORDER THEREON 

Date: February 3, 2006 

Time: 10:30 a.m. 

Judge: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

Dept: 3, 5th Floor 

 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-10(a), Defendant DIGEX, INC. (“DIGEX”), requests permission to 

participate in the Status Conference scheduled for February 3, 2006, at 10:30 a.m. by telephone. 

 DIGEX will be represented at the Status Conference by Anne M. Rogaski, whose direct 

telephone number is 650-463-7601. Counsel will make arrangements with the Court’s teleconference 

services for the telephonic appearance. 

**E-filed 1/27/06**

Case 5:01-cv-20985-JF Document 84 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 2
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

REQUEST TO ATTEND SUBSEQUENT STATUS CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE AND ORDER THEREON - 2 - 

CASE NO.CV-01-20985 JF (RS) 

DATED: January 25, 2006 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

By:/s/ Anne M. Rogaski 

Daniel J. Furniss 

Anne M. Rogaski 

Attorneys for Defendant 

DIGEX, INC. 

ORDER

 Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that DIGEX, INC. may appear at 

the Status Conference, set for February 3, 2006, by telephone. 

Date: 

 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel 

 United States District Court Judge 

60686281 v1 

1/27/06

Case 5:01-cv-20985-JF Document 84 Filed 01/27/06 Page 2 of 2
# m8530.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14.8.2017 C( 2017 ) 5742 final To the Notifying Parties Subject : Case M. 8530 - BROOKFIELD / ENGIE / FHHGL Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 20 July 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Brookfield Renewable UK Hydro Limited, ultimately controlled by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. ("Brookfield" of Canada) and IP Karugamo Holdings (UK) Limited, ultimately controlled by Engie S.A. (" Engie " of France) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control over the whole of the undertaking FHH (Guernsey) Limited ("FHHGL", Guernsey) by way of purchase of shares. 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: ‐ for Brookfield: global asset manager whose portfolio is focused on property, renewable power, infrastructure and private equity; ‐ for Engie : global player active across the entire energy value chain in the fields of gas, electricity and energy services; ‐ for FHHGL: it owns and operates two pumped storage electricity assets in Wales (the UK) and is active in the wholesale supply of electricity. It is currently jointly controlled by Engie and Mitsui Power Ventures Limited. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (S igned) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 244 , 28.7.2017, p. 9 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Kevin J. LAPAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4690

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Robert John SAGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3711

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael DONAHUE, et al, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U. S. BANK TRUST, N. A., as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
M.F., Father of A.O., L.F., and L.F., Minor Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4075

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 4, 2019

Valarie Linnen, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph of Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee; Thomasina F. Moore, Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb of the Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.