alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING NOKIA’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING NOKIA’S

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1409

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Nokia’s motion to seal as 

follows. 

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX9148 Selected rows on page 2 GRANTED.

QX9180 Selected row on page 2 GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1425 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 1
exv10wxdy



 




Exhibit 10(d)




AMENDMENT FIVE

TO

THE FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN NO. 2

(1997 Restatement)



     Article 11 of the Plan is amended effective January 1, 2003, to read as
follows:



ARTICLE 11. ASSIGNMENT OR ALIENATION



     11.1 General Rule. Except as provided in Section 11.2 or as otherwise
required by law, the interest hereunder of any Participant or Beneficiary shall
not be alienable by the Participant or Beneficiary by assignment or any other
method and will not be subject to be taken by his creditors by any process
whatsoever, and any attempt to cause such interest to be so subjected shall not
be recognized.



     11.2 Domestic Relations Orders.



     (a)  All or a portion of a Participant’s benefit under the Plan may be paid
to another person as specified in a “Qualified Domestic Relations Order.” For
this purpose, a “Qualified Domestic Relations Order” means a judgment, decree,
or order (including the approval of a settlement agreement) which is:



          (i) issued pursuant to a State’s domestic relations law;



          (ii) relates to the provision of child support, alimony payments or
marital property rights to a spouse, former spouse, child or other dependent of
the Participant;



          (iii) creates or recognizes the right of a spouse, former spouse, child or
other dependent of the Participant to receive all or a portion of the
Participant’s benefits under the Plan;



          (iv) provides for payment in an immediate lump sum as soon as practicable
after the Committee determines that a Qualified Domestic Relations Order
exists; and

 







 



          (v) meets such other requirements established by the Committee.



     (b)  The Committee shall determine whether any document received by it is a
Qualified Domestic Relations Order. In making this determination, the
Committee may consider:



          (i) the rules applicable to “domestic relations orders” under section
414(p) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and section 206(d) of ERISA;



          (ii) the procedures used under the FleetBoston Financial Savings Plan to
determine the qualified status of domestic relations orders; and



          (iii) such other rules and procedures as it deems relevant.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment Five was adopted by the Human Resources
Committee at its June 17, 2003 meeting and is executed by a duly authorized
officer of FleetBoston Financial Corporation.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ M. ANNE SZOSTAK
	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	M. Anne Szostak
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Executive Vice
President and
Director
of Human Resources
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         355,954
<SECURITIES>                                    34,469
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                       658
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,564,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                 173,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,524,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        956,654
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    279,884
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,218,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,524,089
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,131
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,316
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,316
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79
<FN>
<F1>THE AMOUNT IS REPORTED AS EPS BASIC, NOT PRIMARY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
James Michael HAWLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2658

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# m8680.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14.12.2017 C(2017) 8877 final To the notifying party Subject : Case M. 8680 – BAIN CAPITAL / TOSHIBA MEMORY CORPORATION Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 22 November 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation , by which Bain Capital Investors, LLC ("Bain Capital", United States of America) acquire s within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of T o shiba Memory Corporation ( ''TMC'', Japan ) by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Bain Capital: investment firm with activities in a variety of industries, - for TMC : global manufacturer and supplier of NAND flash memory products and solid-state-drive (“SSD”) memory products for use in a variety of consumer and enterprise applications. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 404 , 29 . 11 . 2017 , p. 7 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Case No. 5:17-CV-00220-LHK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP

Gary A. Bornstein (pro hac vice)

gbornstein@cravath.com

Yonatan Even (pro hac vice)

yeven@cravath.com

825 Eighth Avenue

New York, New York 10019-7475

Telephone: (212) 474-1000

Facsimile: (212) 474-3700

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Richard S. Taffet (pro hac vice)

richard.taffet@morganlewis.com

101 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10178-0060

Telephone: (212) 309-6000

Facsimile: (212) 309-6001

Attorneys for Defendant

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Willard K. Tom (pro hac vice)

willard.tom@morganlewis.com

1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20004-2541

Telephone: (202) 739-3000

Facsimile: (202) 739 3001

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Donn P. Pickett (SBN 72257)

donn.pickett@morganlewis.com

Geoffrey T. Holtz (SBN 191370)

geoffrey.holtz@morganlewis.com

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126

Telephone: (415) 442-1000

Facsimile: (415) 442-1001

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a Delaware 

corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S

NOTICE REGARDING TRANSCRIPTS

Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor

Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1508 Filed 07/01/19 Page 1 of 2
1

Case No. 5:17-CV-00220-LHK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 10-3.1, Defendant-Appellant Qualcomm Incorporated 

respectfully submits the attached Transcript Designation Forms. Qualcomm further certifies that 

all transcripts have been ordered and completed, but certain transcripts have not yet been filed on 

the docket by the court reporters. 

Dated: July 1, 2019

Respectfully submitted,

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP,

_/s/ Gary Bornstein_______________________

Gary A. Bornstein

Yonatan Even

Worldwide Plaza

825 Eighth Avenue

New York, NY 10019

Tel: (212) 474-1000

Fax: (212) 474-3700

gbornstein@cravath.com

yeven@cravath.com

Richard S. Taffet 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

101 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10178-0060

Tel: (212) 309-6000

Fax: (212) 309-6001

richard.taffet@morganlewis.com

Willard K. Tom

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

1111 Pennsylvania Ave. NW

Washington, DC 20004-2541

Tel: (202) 739-3000

Fax: (202) 739 3001 

willard.tom@morganlewis.com

Donn P. Pickett

Geoffrey T. Holtz

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

One Market, Spear Street Tower

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126

Tel: (415) 442-1000

Fax: (415) 442-1001

donn.pickett@morganlewis.com

geoffrey.holtz@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Qualcomm Incorporated

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1508 Filed 07/01/19 Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROGER S. INMAN, DOC #523728, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-723

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 13, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Mark J. O’Brien, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Nathaniel DELGADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-516

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
SEC’S NON-OPPOSITION TO RECEIVER’S 

TWENTY FIRST QUARTERLY FEE APPLICATION

 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00223-RS

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

MONIQUE C. WINKLER (Cal. Bar No. 213031) 

 winklerm@sec.gov 

SUSAN F. LAMARCA (Cal. Bar No. 215231) 

 lamarcas@sec.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 705-2500 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SAN FRANCISCO REGIONAL CENTER, LLC, 

et al. 

 Defendants and Relief Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00223-RS 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION’S STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO RECEIVER’S MOTION 

FOR APPROVAL OF TWENTY FIRST 

APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION AND 

RELATED MOTIONS BY PROFESSIONALS 

Date: Nov. 3, 2022 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Place: Courtroom 3, 17th Floor 

 450 Golden Gate Ave. 

 San Francisco, CA 94102 

Judge: The Hon. Richard Seeborg 

Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 1015 Filed 10/06/22 Page 1 of 2
SEC’S NON-OPPOSITION TO RECEIVER’S TWENTY FIRST

QUARTERLY FEE APPLICATION

1 CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00223-RS

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) hereby submits this statement of nonopposition to the Receiver’s Motion for Approval of her Twenty First Application for Compensation, 

and the related motions for compensation by the professionals she has retained (Docket Nos. 1011-

1014). 

 

Dated: October 6, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Susan F. LaMarca Susan F. LaMarca 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 1015 Filed 10/06/22 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Brian W. Sturgell, Chief Executive Officer of Novelis Inc. (“Novelis”), certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Novelis;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006       /s/ Brian W. Sturgell     Brian W. Sturgell    Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horse Sense Stable Services,
Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  October 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
High, President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael High
Michael High
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


December 16, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

LYNK LABS, INC., Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1934

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021

- 01300.

------------------------------------------------

LYNK LABS, INC., Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1897

______________________ Case: 23-1897 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 07/11/2023LYNK LABS

, INC

. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO

., LTD

. 2

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021

- 01299

.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Lynk Labs, Inc.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss Appeal No. 2023

- 1897 pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2023

- 1897 is

dismissed. The caption for the remaining appeal is reflected above.

(2) Each side shall be ar its own costs as to Appeal No.

2023

- 1897.

(3) Lynk Labs’s opening brief in appeal No. 2023

- 1934 is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order.

Ju ly 11 , 2023
Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow
Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (AS TO NO. 2023

- 1897 ONLY): July 11, 2023 Case: 23-1897 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 07/11/2023
EX PARTE Larry Earl RENO

CR-16-1029

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
exv4w2






Exhibit 4.2




Consent of Ian Cunningham-Dunlop




     I, Ian Cunningham-Dunlop, hereby confirm that I have read the Offer and Circular of Fronteer
Development Group Inc. (the “Company”) furnished with the Company’s offer dated January 23, 2009 to
purchase all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Aurora Energy Resources Inc., which
Offer and Circular incorporates by reference the Company’s annual information form dated March 27,
2008 for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports in the AIF or other documents
incorporated by reference therein: (i) the technical report dated August 1, 2007 entitled
“Technical Report on the Aði Daði Gold Property, Çanakkale Province, Turkey” prepared together with
Christopher Lee, (ii) the technical report dated August 1, 2007 entitled “Technical Report on the
Kirazli Gold Property, Çanakkale Province, Republic of Turkey” prepared together with Christopher
Lee, and (iii) the amended technical report dated November 20, 2007 entitled “The Exploration
Activities of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. on the CMB Uranium Property, Labrador, Canada, During
the Period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007” prepared together with Gary Giroux, Dr. D.H.C.
Wilton, Mark O’Dea, Jim Lincoln and Christopher Lee (collectively, the “Technical Reports”). I
further consent to the inclusion in the Offer and Circular and the registration statement on Form
F-8 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration Statement”)
of the Technical Reports (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of the AIF in
the Offer and Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Reports in the Offer and
Circular and the Registration Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Reports and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Reports contained in the Offer and Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Reports
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Reports.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	January 23, 2009 	  	(signed) Ian Cunningham-Dunlop
 	 
	 	 	Ian Cunningham-Dunlop, P.Eng.