alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gerardo Rivas Jr.

, * From the 183rd District Court

of Harris County,

Trial Court No. 16321 7 8

.

Vs. No. 11

- 20

- 00 1 8 4

- CR * September 25 , 20 20

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

( Willson , J., not participating)

This court has considered Gerardo Rivas Jr.’s motion to dismiss this appeal

and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with

this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6375

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DENNIS LAMAR BRUTON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00013-MR-3; 

1:12-cv-00123-MR)

Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 24, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Lamar Bruton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Lamar Bruton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying Bruton’s 

motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his second Fed. R. Civ. P. 

60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2012) motion as untimely. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because 

the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal 

must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). 

“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” 

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 22, 2018. The 

notice of appeal was filed on March 29, 2018.

*

 Because Bruton failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a 

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 24.5

Power of Attorney of Gaylen D. Kemp



STATE OF GEORGIA

COUNTY OF COBB


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Gaylen D. Kemp, a Director of
     EDUTREK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia corporation, do constitute and
     appoint Steve Bostic and Donald J. Blankers jointly and severally, my
     true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution
     and resubstitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign the
     Annual Report on Form 10-K for EDUTREK INTERNATIONAL, INC. for the
     fiscal year ended May 31, 1998, pursuant to the requirements of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
     and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf
     and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said
     Annual Report, incorporating such changes as any of the said
     attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming
     all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or
     substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 26th day of 
August 1998.


                                       /s/   Gaylen D. Kemp
                                       --------------------
                                       Gaylen D. Kemp




                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                 --------------

BEFORE me this 26th day of August 1998, came Gaylen D. Kemp, personally known
       to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing
       Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                                       /s/   Cynthia Gardere
                                       ---------------------
                                       NOTARY PUBLIC


                                       State of Georgia
                                                -------
                                       My Commission Expires:

                                       September 11, 1999
                                       ------------------
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                Health Fraud Scams

Health Fraud Scams

                        El Fraude en la Salud Home
          For Consumers
          Health Fraud Scams
          Health Fraud Scams - Be Smart, Be Aware, Be CarefulHealth Fraud Scams Health Fraud Scams - Be Smart, Be Aware, Be Careful
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    Print

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      08/26/2015Health Fraud Scams

          
                        El Fraude en la Salud
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6981

DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAULA SMITH; REGGIE WEISNER; WHITNER; MATT

CLARK; NIMAN; VALERIE CARSWELL; BELL; HATTIE

PIMPONG; MITCH JOHNSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (5:04-cv-00182)

Submitted: July 20, 2007 Decided: August 15, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dontez Lamont Simuel, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dontez Lamont Simuel appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Simuel v.

Smith, No. 5:04-cv-00182 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                   SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of China Housing & Land Development, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:

| | 1) | The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |     |                                      
|------------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------
|Dated: November 13, 2008 | By: | /s/ William Xin                      
|                         |     | William Xin
(Chief Financial Officer)
|                         |     |                                      

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BENJAMIN COOPER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 615 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Opinion issued December 7, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00663-CV

———————————

LAUREN WITZKE, Appellant

V.

ERIC VAUGHN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2023-17749

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Lauren Witzke has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal because, 

although she filed a notice of appeal, she asserts that she intended to file only a 

mandamus proceeding. A mandamus proceeding has been filed under appellate 

case number 01-23-00712-CV. Accordingly, appellant asks that we dismiss the 
2

appeal. The certificate of conference indicates that appellee is unopposed to 

dismissal.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRAIG RICHARD CHANDLER,

Petitioner,

v.

SCOTT FRAUENHEIM,

Respondent.

Case No. 17-cv-00325-EMC 

ORDER

Docket Nos. 17, 18

Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and request for a certificate of appealability. His request 

for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Docket No. 17. This is not a case in which 

“reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable 

or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). This 

denial is without prejudice to Petitioner filing a request for a certificate of appealability in the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Petitioner’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED

because Petitioner did not attach to it the necessary certified copy of his inmate trust account 

statement. Docket No. 18; see id. at question 1. Petitioner may file a new application in the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but is cautioned that he should attach to that 

application a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2018

______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge
Case 3:06-cv-00060-M Document 31 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 305
IN RE: Maurice R. FRANKS

NO. 2018-OB-1903

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

ORDER

Considering the Petition for Transfer to Disability Inactive Status filed by respondent, Maurice R. Franks, and the report and recommendation of the hearing committee,

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's claim of inability to defend be and it hereby is denied as invalid. See Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 22(C)(3).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Maurice R. Franks, Louisiana Bar Roll number 8525, be and he hereby is reinstated to active status from interim disability inactive status. This order shall be effective immediately.

*301FOR THE COURT:

/s/

JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC., and

ALBERT CHIN,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-07213 WHA

ORDER DENYING PRO 

HAC VICE APPLICATION

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Christopher Ziegler (Dkt. No. 21) is DENIED

because the application form states Attorney Ziegler is “an active member in good standing of

the bar of Fed. Cir. Court of Appeal” but the attached certificate of good standing is from the

United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. While the application

fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is

submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:16-cv-07213-WHA Document 23 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAND 435 

(CAND Rev. 08/2018)

TRANSCRIPT ORDER 

Please use one form per court reporter. 

CJA counsel please use Form CJA24 

Please read instructions on next page.

1a. CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS ORDER 2a. CONTACT PHONE NUMBER 3. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS 1b. ATTORNEY NAME (if different) 2b. ATTORNEY PHONE NUMBER 3. ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRES4. MAILING ADDRESS (INCLUDE LAW FIRM NAME, IF APPLICABLE) 5. CASE NAME 

8. THIS TRANSCRIPT ORDER IS FOR: 

7. COURT REPORTER NAME ( FOR FTR, LEAVE BLANK AND &+(&.%2;ȹޫ FTR ޫ APPEAL 

ޫ NON-APPEAL 

ޫ CRIMINAL ޫ CIVIL 

ޫ In forma pauperis (NOTE: Court or

 CJA: Do not use this form; use Form C

9. TRANSCRIPT(S) REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested), format(s) & quantity and delivery type: 

a. HEARING(S) (OR PORTIONS OF HEARINGS) b. SELECT FORMAT(S) (NOTE: ECF access is included with purchase of PDF, text, paper or condensed.) c. DELIVERY TYPE (Choos

DATE JUDGE 

(initials)

TYPE 

(e.g. CMC) 

PORTION 

If requesting less than full hearing, 

specify portion (e.g. witness or time)

PDF 

(email) 

TEXT/ASCII 

(email) 

PAPER CONDENSED 

(email) 

ECF ACCESS 

(web) 

ORDINARY

(30-day) 

14-Day EXPEDITED

(7-day) 

{ { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { 

10. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, INSTRUCTIONS, QUESTIONS, ETC: ORDER & CERTIFICATION (11. & 12.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges (deposit plus additional). 12. DAT11. SIGNATURE 

David Liebov (212) 558-3585 liebovd@sullcrom

Angela Choe (212) 558-3043 choey@sullcrom.

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP125 Broad StreetNew York, NY 10004

Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorp

Lee-Anne Shortridge ✔

01/14/2019 LHK Michael Lasinski Testimo 01/22/2019 LHK Jeffrey Andrews Testimon ●

●

s/ Angela Choe 05/0

Clear Form 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1488 Filed 05/07/19 Page 1 of 1
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Financial Condition 

March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 

(unaudited) 

 March 31

2014

 December 31

2013

Assets 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 174,604,907 $ 249,284,896

 

 Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 3,308,984,853 3,060,464,938

 

 Accrued Interest Receivable 18,249,694 12,600,947

 Premiums Receivable 54,297,000 173,639,000

Other Receivables 

 

1,297

 

0.00

 

Total Assets $ 3,556,137,751 $ 3,495,989,781

 

 

Liabilities and Insurance Fund 

 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 316,928 $ 341,346

 

 Farm Credit Insurance Fund 

 

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 3,555,820,823 3,495,648,435

 

 Total Insurance Fund 3,555,820,823 3,495,648,435

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 3,556,137,751 $ 3,495,989,781
 

 

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Revenue and Expense 

For the Period Ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 

(unaudited) 

Calendar Year To Date

March 31, 2014

Calendar Year To Date

March 31, 2013

Income 

 

Premiums $ 54,246,000 $ 43,425,000

Interest Income on Investments 6,673,919 3,600,628

Total Income $ 60,919,919 $ 47,025,628

Expenses 

 

Administrative Operating Expenses $ 747,531 $ 761,928

Total Expenses $ 747,531 $ 761,928

 

Net Income $ 60,172,388 $ 46,263,700

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund 

For Period Ended March 31, 2014 

(unaudited) 

Balance at January 1, 2014 $ 3,495,648,435 

Net Income 60,172,388 

Balance at March 31, 2014 $ 3,555,820,823
Dinah R. VILLAR and Michael A. Villar, Appellants, v. HERITAGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2189

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: RELOCATION OF 

MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 38-1-12 AND 

CONSOLIDATION OF FACILITIES FOR 

MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS 38-1-11 and

38-1-12 WITHIN THE THIRTY-EIGHTH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 412

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9

th day of February 2017, upon consideration of the Petition to 

Relocate Magisterial District Court 38-1-12 and Consolidate Magisterial Districts 38-1-

11 and 38-1-12 of the Thirty-eighth Judicial District (Montgomery County) of the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania into one facility located at 1 Security Plaza, Pottstown, 

PA it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is GRANTED, effective November 1, 2016.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Pegasus Solutions, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, the undersigned,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and  2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. March 10, 2004
    
    /s/ JOHN F. DAVIS, III
John F. Davis, III,
Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President
 March 10, 2004
    
    /s/ SUSAN K. COLE
Susan K. Cole,
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Gene E. ALDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2250

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:17-cr-00033-WHA Document 12 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 1
Robert G. MURPHY and Pamela Murphy v. Shauntal SAVANNAH; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a.k.a. State Farm; State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Transportation and Development

No. 2018-C-0991

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 3, 2018

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Antonio FERNANDEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Bob GUALTIERI, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1756

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.