1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE: QUALCOMM ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION

Case No. 17-MD-02773-LHK 

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES

The following cases are hereby CONSOLIDATED with the Multi-District Litigation 

(“MDL”) case In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation, 17-MD-02773-LHK.

Bornstein et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-0234-LHK

Stromberg et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-304-LHK

McMahon v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-372-LHK

Boardsports School, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-398-LHK

Benad et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-440-LHK

Key v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-442-LHK

Ewald et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-565-LHK

Esteban v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-622-LHK

Case 5:17-cv-00304-LHK Document 32 Filed 04/26/17 Page 1 of 3
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Davis et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-604-LHK

Housenick, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-675-LHK

Ervin v. Qualcomm, Inc., Case No. 17-CV-713-LHK

Carney v. Qualcomm, Inc., Case No. 17-CV-743-LHK

Tada et al. v. Qualcomm, Inc., Case No. 17-CV-762-LHK

Crutcher, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-766-LHK

Kiefer, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-785-LHK

Zatlin, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-938-LHK

Ackerman, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-1080-LHK

Dietrich v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-1093-LHK

Espinosa, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-1112-LHK

Hallahan v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-1231-LHK

McDevitt et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-1244-LHK

Kurzon v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-1271-LHK

Nagy, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-1274-LHK

Schwartz, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-02166-LHK

Hadnett v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-02167-LHK

Carroll, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-02168-LHK

Rotman, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-02169-LHK

Herrera, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-02170-LHK

Frederick, et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-02171-LHK

Kreuzer v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-02172-LHK

Miller et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-01902-LHK

Mackay et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-01903-LHK

Acosta et al. v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-15911

 

1 On April 3, 2017, Plaintiffs in the Bornstein action filed an administrative motion to relate 

Acosta to Bornstein and the other Qualcomm actions. Docket No. 17-CV-00220, ECF No. 67. 

Case 5:17-cv-00304-LHK Document 32 Filed 04/26/17 Page 2 of 3
3

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Carr v. Qualcomm Inc., Case No. 17-CV-021332

Any future filings in any of the above individual cases shall be filed in the MDL case, 17-MD02773-LHK, rather than in the individual cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2017

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

 

The Court consolidates Acosta here, and denies as moot the administrative motion to relate.

2 On April 17, 2017, Plaintiffs in the Carr case filed an administrative motion to relate Carr to 

Bornstein and the other Qualcomm actions. See ECF No. 7. The Court consolidates Carr here, 

and denies as moot the administrative motion to relate.

Case 5:17-cv-00304-LHK Document 32 Filed 04/26/17 Page 3 of 3