alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.4
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
111 S. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-4301
USA

Tel:    +1 312 486 1000
Fax:    +1 312 486 1486
www.deloitte.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation
Vernon Hills, Illinois

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that
Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation (the "Company") complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the "Platform") as
of and for the year ended November 30, 2007, excluding criteria 1122
(d)(1)(ii), (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(iv), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(4)(x),
(d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), and (d)(4)(xv), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform. Appendix A to the accompanying management's assertion
identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as
constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were
limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have
included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included
in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period
specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria for the Residential Mortgage Loans
Platform as of and for the year ended November 30, 2007 is fairly stated, in
all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 14, 2008

Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Exhibit 35.g
                                                       Corporate Trust Services
                                                       MAC N2702-011
    [LOGO] Wells Fargo                                 9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       410 884-2000
                                                       410 715-2380 Fax

                                                       Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas
1761 East Saint Andrews Place
Attention Trust Admin-DB07C9
Santa Ana, CA 92707

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance
    ---------------------------------

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

      (a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Trustee under the servicing
      agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)")
      has been made under my supervision; and

      (b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all
      material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2008

/s/ Judith Rishel
---------------------------
JUDITH RISHEL
Vice President





To: Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas
<PAGE>

                                                       Corporate Trust Services
                                                       MAC N2702-011
    [LOGO] Wells Fargo                                 9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       410 884-2000
                                                       410 715-2380 Fax

                                                       Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.



                                                                  Schedule A
                                                                  ----------

                    List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1  Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
   Corporation, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM
   2007-C9, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

2  Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities
   Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-CD5, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee





To: Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD COTRELLE TIDWELL,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CARRINGTON REAL ESTATE

SERVICES (US), LLC, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00437 WHA

ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

Plaintiff’s application for a temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 18), to the extent

comprehensible, is based on an underlying unlawful detainer action and writs issued by the state

court on November 8, 2011 (although plaintiff states “it is overwhelmingly evident the Lord

Jesus Christ has intervened thereby causing the November 8, 2011 Writ to expire”); August 22,

2016; and March 10, 2017 (see id. at 2, 4, 6, 10). The application is DENIED. Plaintiff

currently resides in the property at issue (id. at 9). Nothing that allegedly happened in the

recent past indicates the underlying unlawful detainer action threatens imminent and immediate

eviction (see, e.g., id. at 3–4). Even if it did, due process has been satisfied by the due process

supplied by the state court. To the extent that plaintiff has a grievance with a writ issued by the

state court or an ongoing unlawful detainer action against him, he should direct those

grievances to the state court, not federal court.

Case 3:17-cv-00437-WHA Document 20 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

If plaintiff proposes to pursue this federal action, then this denial of a temporary

restraining order is without prejudice to a motion, properly made and served, for a preliminary

injunction directed at the proper defendants. So advising, this order does not suggest that such a

motion could be brought in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00437-WHA Document 20 Filed 03/15/17 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PETER MANUEL CANDELARIA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00007-CR

Appeal from the

118th District Court 

of Howard County, Texas 

(TC#15,554) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH OF APRIL, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
<PAGE>


                            EXHIBIT 23.1 TO FORM 10-K

                       Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-30677) and Form S-3
(File No. 333-33527) of our report dated February 20, 1998, on our audits
of the consolidated financial statements of Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years then ended, which report is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 27, 1998
Patrick HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-473

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32





BWI HOLDINGS, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BWI Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce Milroy, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: December 22, 2010
By:
/s/ Bruce MilroyName:
Bruce MilroyTitle:
Principal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
EX PARTE Keith L. MARKS

CR-16-1350

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
� 

..., 

Qi 

- u V) .!: 

Q) .., ,:,0 ·-

C !: ro o1S !: L. L. Q) :£! 'P 

�ca Q) :, 

� � 

1 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP 

BENNETT G. YOUNG (Bar No. 106504) 

2 byoung@jmbm.com 

Two Embarcadero Center, 5th Floor 

3 San Francisco, California 94111-3813 

Telephone: (415) 398-8080

4 Facsimile: (415) 398-5584

5 Special Counsel for Receiver Susan L. Uecker 

6 

7 

8 

9 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SAN FRANCISCO REGIONAL CENTER, LLC; 

THOMAS M. HENDERSON; CALIFORNIA 

GOLD MEDAL, L.P.; CALLSOCKET, LP.; 

CALLSOCKET II, L.P.; CALLSOCKET III, 

L.P.; COMPREHENSIVE CARE OF

OAKLAND, L.P.; NA3PL, L.P.; WEST

OAKLAND PLAZA, L.P.; CALLSOCKET,

LLC; CALLSOCKET II, LLC; CALLSOCKET

III, LLC; COMPREHENSIVE CARE OF

CALIFORNIA, LLC; IMMEDIA, LLC; and

NORTH AMERICA 3PL, LLC,

Defendants, 

-andCALLSOCKET HOLDING COMPANY, LLC; 

CALLSOCKET III HOLDING COMP ANY, 

LLC; BERKELEY HEALTHCARE 

DYNAMICS, LLC; CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 

FARMS, LLC; and JL GATEWAY, LLC, 

Relief Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-CV-00223-RS 

ORDER TERMINATING 

RECEIVERSHIP AS TO BERKELEY 

HEALTHCARE DYNAMICS, LLC AND 

DISCHARGING RECEIVER AS TO 

THAT RECEIVERSHIP ENTITY ONLY 

65938540v2 

1 Case No. 3:17-CV-00223-RS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

6/27/19
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

# **Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer ofVornado Realty L.P. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) 10-K for year ended December 31, 2014**(the “Report”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

|           |   |   |
|----------------|--------|--------|
| March 27, 2015 |   |   | /s/ Stephen  W. Theriot |
|           |   | Name:  | Stephen W. Theriot |
|           |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer of Vornado  Realty Trust,

Sole General Partner of Vornado  Realty L.P. |
Kyle PIERRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4896

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 14, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 13

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-13 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a 

Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been 

filed. All parties have filed statements of non-opposition. As the judge assigned to case 

17-cv-00485-WHO

City and County of San Francisco v. Donald J. Trump

I find that the more recently filed case that I have initialed below is related to the case 

assigned to me, and such case shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not 

related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case 

for a related case determination.

Case Title Related Not Related

17-cv-00574-LHK County of Santa Clara v. Donald J. Trump WHO

ORDER

The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the 

initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management 

conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the 

dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. 

Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local 

Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to 

govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned 

judge.

Dated: February 10, 2017 By: ________________________

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 19 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 1
# L_2017271EN.01003301.xml

| 20.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 271/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 271/33

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/1919

of 19 October 2017

on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 13th partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage (2), and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure.

| (2) | In the light of the tenders received for the 13th partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the tenders received for the 13th partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed.

| (3) | The Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 13th partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 17 October 2017, the minimum selling price shall be 144,05 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 October 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p. 71.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 of 25 November 2016 opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure (OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 45).

3

---
Minimum 

40% of 

Maximum investment ≥ 5 Years =

20% of Investment Portfolio

Investment Portfolio Maturity Durations

$6.79 Billion

December 31, 2023

($ in Millions)

Average Yield for 2023 is 2.45%
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of California

MITZIE PEREZ, individually and on behalf of all

others similarly situated, and CALIFORNIA LEAGUE

OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS,

3:17-cv-00454-JCS

WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS FARGO, N.A.,

WELLS FARGO, N.A.,

CSC - Lawyers Incorporating Service

2710 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150N

Sacramento, CA 95833

OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP, Jahan C. Sagafi / Katrina Eiland, One Embarcadero

Center, 38th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111

MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, Thomas A.

Saenz & Victor Viramontes, 634 S. Spring St., 11th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90014

02/01/2017

February 6, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan Y. Soong Case 3:17-cv-00454-MMC Document 12 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

17 Civ. 454

0.00

CV 17-454 JCS

Case 3:17-cv-00454-MMC Document 12 Filed 02/06/17 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-527

In Re: JOHNNIE ROWE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-868)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Rowe, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Johnnie Rowe filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel

the district court to act on his response and the motion to dismiss

his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). Defendants filed

the motion to dismiss on October 9, 1997, to which Rowe responded

on October 16, 1997. The motion and response are before a magistrate judge for his report and recommendation to the district

court. We find that the delay in the district court has not been

unreasonable. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice to Rowe’s right to refile if the district

court does not act within a reasonable time. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED