alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Banc of America Mortgage 2007-3 Trust
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2007-3

  I, Robert Caruso, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, National
  Association (the "Servicer"), certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Banc of America Mortgage 2007-3 Trust (the "Exchange
    Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer
    and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in
    preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report
    under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
    Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its
    obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, dated August 30,
    2007, among Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., as depositor,
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, and the Servicer, in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
    of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 25, 2008


    /s/ Robert Caruso
    Signature

    Senior Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
Janet Brown RUDDOCK and Duval L. Ruddock, Sr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1684

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 05, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


                       AMENDMENT 1 TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

         This Amendment 1 to Severance Agreement ("Amendment 1") is made and
entered into effective November 11, 1998, by and between BAKER HUGHES
INCORPORATED, A Delaware corporation (the "Company") and __________________ (the
"Executive").

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to make certain changes
to that certain Severance Agreement dated as of July 23, 1997, by and between
the Company and the Executive (the "Severance Agreement"), to conform the
Severance Agreement with the form executed by other executives of the Company
and to take into account the recent Change in Control (as defined in the
Severance Agreement) involving Western Atlas Inc.;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
agreements contained herein, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as
follows:

1.       Term. The following shall be added to the end of Paragraph 2 of the
         Severance Agreement:

         "; and further provided, however, that solely with respect to any
         rights or claims of the Executive in connection with the Change in
         Control brought about by the merger with Western Atlas Inc. which
         occurred on August 10, 1998, the Term shall be deemed to expire on
         September 1, 2000, but for all other purposes and other events of
         Change in Control which may occur subsequent to August 10, 1998, this
         proviso shall have no force or effect."

2.       13th Month Good Reason Waiver. The following language which appears in
lines 3, 4, and 5 of Section 6.1(ii) of the Severance Agreement is hereby
deleted:

         "or (ii) the Executive voluntarily terminates his employment for any
         reason during the one-month period commencing on the first anniversary
         of the Change in Control,"

         All capitalized terms in this Amendment 1 shall have the definition
         ascribed to those terms in the Severance Agreement. The Severance
         Agreement continues in full force and effect, except as amended hereby.
         This Amendment 1 may be executed in several counterparts, each of which
         shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together will
         constitute one and the same instrument.

         EXECUTED effective the day and year first written above.


                                             Company:
                                             BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED

                                             By:
                                                --------------------------------
                                             John F. Maher
                                             Chairman-Compensation Committee
                                             of the Board of Directors

                                             Executive:

                                             -----------------------------------
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141890

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141890 COA: 291664 Jackson CC: 07-003911-FH TERRAL WINDMON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 17, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2014-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2014 (as amended and
supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2014-1, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from February 20, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting
Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer
this 30th day of March, 2015.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
EX PARTE Rakhem Domonique SHIELDS

CR-17-0192

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

VICTORIA GREENE,

Petitioner

v.

SOMMER LAW GROUP, P.C.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 56 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of July, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Delvon CYRUS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-195

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

AMANDA SAMMONS HENDERSON 

TORRES,

 Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA NAJERA,

 Appellee. 

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-12-00127-CV

Appeal from

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2008CM4977)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination whether it should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant failed to pay the case filing fee, we 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on April 11, 2012. She did not pay the filing fee as 

required by TEX.R.APP.P. 5, nor did she establish her indigence in accordance with 

TEX.R.APP.P. 20.1. On April 13, 2012 and May 9, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified 

Appellant she had not paid the filing fee and advised that failure to pay the filing fee within 

twenty days would result in dismissal of the appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(b) and (c). 

Appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the Clerk’s inquiries. We 

therefore dismiss the appeal.

July 31, 2012 ________________________________________________

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         6,485
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,365
<PP&E>                                         350,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (61,694)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,299,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          471,092
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,574
<OTHER-SE>                                     (33,837)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,299,829
<SALES>                                        91,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               91,841
<CGS>                                          244,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             193,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (453,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (453,778)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.029)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.029)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Oliver, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-S Security Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 14, 2007



/s/ John R. OliverJohn R. Oliver,Chief Financial Officer
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR 3-16-71622 JSC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

United States Attorney

BARBARA J. VALLIERE (DCBN 439353)

Chief, Criminal Division 

SUSAN KNIGHT (CABN 209013)

Assistant United States Attorney

150 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 900

San Jose, California 95113

Telephone: (408) 535-5056

FAX: (408) 535-5061

E-Mail: Susan.Knight@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

FRANK MABRY, and

BRYAN MATEOS ZAPARDIEL,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR No. 3-16-71622 JSC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

REQUESTING CONTINUATION OF 

ARRAIGNMENT DATE 

The undersigned parties request that the arraignment scheduled for Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 

9:30 a.m. be continued to August 30, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. The reason for the continuance is to afford the 

parties an opportunity to continue exploring a pre-indictment resolution. 

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: 7/10/17 BRIAN J. STRETCH

United States Attorney

/s/

SUSAN KNIGHT

Assistant United States Attorney
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR 3-16-71622 JSC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: 7/10/17

/s/

MARY MCNAMARA 

AUDREY A. BARRON

Counsel for Mr. Mateos Zapardiel

DATED: 7/10/17

/s/

JODI LINKER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Counsel for Mr. Mabry

ORDER

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the arraignment 

scheduled for July 12, 2017 is continued to August 30, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.

The Court FURTHER HEREBY ORDERS that time be excluded under Rule 5.1 of the Federal 

Rules of Criminal Procedure. In addition, the Court ORDERS that time be excluded from the Speedy 

Trial Act from July 12, 2017 to August 30, 2017, based on the aforementioned reasons, that the ends of 

justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial. The failure to grant the requested continuance would deny defense counsel 

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, 

and would result in a miscarriage of justice. The Court therefore concludes that this exclusion of time 

should be made under 18 U.S.C. '' 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________________________________

HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge 

July 10, 2017
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOHN ASEPH,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10458

D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00363-GMN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

John Aseph appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for six counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1343. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

APR 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10458

Aseph contends that the district court abused its discretion by basing his

sentence on an unreliable amount of loss not substantiated by either probation or

the parties. The district court correctly calculated the advisory guidelines range

based on the stipulated amount of loss. Contrary to Aseph’s contention, the district

court did not select a sentence at the high end of the guidelines range based on its

belief that the loss was greater than the stipulated amount. Rather, the court

properly considered the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors in arriving at a substantively reasonable, within-Guidelines

sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DEFENDANT CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION

DUANE MORRIS LLP

Nicole E. Grigg (CA SBN 307733)

negrigg@duanemorris.com

D. Stuart Bartow (CA SBN 233107)

dsbartow@duanemorris.com

2475 Hanover Street

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194

Telephone: 650.847.4146

Facsimile: 650.847.4151

DUANE MORRIS LLP

Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590)

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

japowers@duanemorris.com

Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038)

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

jmgunther@duanemorris.com

30 South 17th Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Telephone: 215.979.1000

Facsimile: 215.979.1020

Attorneys for Defendant

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

DUANE MORRIS LLP

L. Norwood Jameson (GA SBN 003970)

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

wjameson@duanemorris.com

Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287789)

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

mcgaudet@duanemorris.com

David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040)

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

dcdotson@duanemorris.com

John R. Gibson (GA SBN 454507)

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

jrgibson@duanemorris.com

Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650)

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

jhforte@duanemorris.com

Alice E. Snedeker

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

aesnedeker@duanemorris.com

1075 Peachtree NE, Suite 2000

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: 404.253.6900

Facsimile: 404.253.6901

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California

Corporation,

Defendant.

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00072-BLF-SVK

DEFENDANT CISCO SYSTEMS, 

INC.’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO 

REQUEST REDACTION

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 593 Filed 04/29/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

DEFENDANT CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

Pursuant to Dkt. No. 560, Defendant Cisco Systems Inc. (“Cisco”) hereby gives notice of 

intent to request redaction of the Transcript of Proceedings held on April 21, 2020 before Judge 

Susan Van Keulen as it contains Cisco’s confidential technical information.

Dated: April 29, 2020 DUANE MORRIS LLP

/s/ Nicole E. Grigg

Nicole E. Grigg 

D. Stuart Bartow

L. Norwood Jameson (admitted pro hac vice)

Matthew C. Gaudet (admitted pro hac vice)

David C. Dotson (admitted pro hac vice)

John R. Gibson (admitted pro hac vice)

Jennifer H. Forte (admitted pro hac vice)

Joseph A. Powers (admitted pro hac vice)

Jarrad M. Gunther (admitted pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Defendant

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 593 Filed 04/29/20 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017038EN.01004102.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/41

---

Action brought on 1 December 2016 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V)

(Case T-848/16)

(2017/C 038/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vans, Inc. (Cypress, California, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (representation ‘V’) — Application No 10 345 403

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 September 2016 in Case R 2129/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 151(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 19(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 151(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 19(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95;

| — | Infringement of Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) and (3) and Rule 20(1) of Regulation No 2868/95; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) and (3) and Rule 20(1) of Regulation No 2868/95;

| — | Infringement of the principles of legal security, of sound administration, of equal treatment and of non-retroactivity. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles of legal security, of sound administration, of equal treatment and of non-retroactivity.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Charles El-Moussa, President, Secretary and Treasurer of
Netfone, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Netfone, Inc. for the period
          ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Netfone, Inc.

Date: April 27, 2009


/s/ Charles El-Moussa
--------------------------------------------
Charles El-Moussa
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)