alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USA

Plaintiff,

 v.

Chaudhari 

Defendant.

 /

NO. CR 05-00300 MAG 

CLERK’S NOTICE RE: FAILURE

TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY

AND/OR REGISTER AS AN EFILER

On 6/23/205, counsel for Defedant filed a Stipulation For Continuance of Hearing Date manually, on paper.

This case has been designated for electronic filing, pursuant to Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45.

The above mentioned paper document has been filed and docketed. However, General Order 45 provides

at Section III that cases assigned to judges who participate in the e-filing program “shall be presumptively

designated” as e-filing cases. Therefore, counsel for Defendant should submit the document, in PDF format

within 10 days, as anattachment inane-mail message directed to the judges chamber's "PDF"email boxlisted

at http://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. (Click on the Judges button and follow the procedure listed there). Do not

e-file a document which has been previously filed on paper, asisthe case with the above mentioned filing. All

subsequent papers should be e-filed.

Further, General Order 45 provides at Section IV (A) that "Each attorney of record is obligated to become

an ECF User and be assigned a userID and password for accessto the systemupondesignation of the action

Case 3:05-cr-00300-BZ Document 9 Filed 06/23/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

as being subject to ECF." Counsel in this case who have not yet registered as ECF Users must do so

immediately. Forms and instructions for registering can be found on the Court's Web site at

ecf.cand.uscourts.gov.

Dated: June 28, 2005 Valerie Kyono

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:05-cr-00300-BZ Document 9 Filed 06/23/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Mark Eric WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gayle HOLLINGSWORTH, Etc.; et al., Defendants, Gayle Hollingsworth, Registered Nurse at Telford, Individually and in official capacity, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-40063.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 11, 2001.

Justin M. Waggoner, Smyser, Kaplan & Veselka, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Charles Kenneth Eldred, Sharon Felfe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

*840PER CURIAM:

This case is REMANDED to the original panel for reconsideration in the light of *Booth v. Churner,*531 U.S. 956, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESSEX EMERYVILLE OWNER, L.P.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MELINDA SCOTT,

Defendant. /

No. C 17-00121 WHA

ORDER

REMANDING ACTION

On January 19, 2017, defendant Melinda Scott was ordered to show cause, in writing,

why this unlawful detainer case should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction

by February 9. As of February 15, 2017, defendant Scott has filed no response. This order

joins the multitude of decisions of district courts in our circuit holding that the Protecting

Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 does not confer federal subject-matter jurisdiction and

hereby REMANDS the case. Defendant’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED AS

MOOT. The Clerk shall please CLOSE THE FILE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00121-WHA Document 6 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 1
Kenneth BROOKINS, Sr., Appellant, v. Linda BROOKINS, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3486

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 5, 2019]

Andrew H. Rappeport of Andrew H. Rappeport, P.A., Bay Harbor Islands, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*54*Affirmed* . *See**Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee* , 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

Warner, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SIX4THREE, LLC, a Delaware limited

liability company,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation,

and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendant. /

No. C 17-00359 WHA

REQUEST FOR FURTHER

RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF

Facebook has withdrawn its opposition to Six4Three’s motion to remand in light of

Six4Three’s unequivocal statement that it would not rely on federal law in support of its Section

17200 claim. Counsel for Six4Three contacted the Court’s deputy, asking whether the hearing

on the pending motion would be vacated. Although all now agree that the action should be

remanded, Six4Three has not withdrawn its request for fees and costs incurred as a result of

removal. By 2:00 P.M. TODAY, Six4Three shall state whether it withdraws its requests for fees

and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 15, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 31 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 1
Devon Christopher JENNINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3019

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 344 

Expressing support for the State of Israel joining the African Union under 

observer status. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 9, 2021 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. ROUNDS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the State of Israel joining the African 

Union under observer status. 

Whereas the State of Israel enjoyed observer status in the 

predecessor organization to the African Union known as 

the Organization of African Unity until its dissolution in 

2002; 

Whereas the late Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi blocked 

Israel from obtaining observer status at the African 

Union in 2002; 

Whereas Israel, in the span of a few decades, has emerged 

as a developed nation and therefore offers an example of 

a path to economic progress for developing countries; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 344 IS 

Whereas Israel has long been an active and valuable partner 

to many African nations, cultivating numerous strong bilateral relationships across the continent; 

Whereas Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a historic visit to Africa in July 2016 and became the first 

leader outside of Africa to address the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in June 2017; 

Whereas many African leaders subsequently visited Israel, including those from the Republic of Chad, the Kingdom 

of Eswatini, the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, the Republic of Ghana, the Republic of Coˆte 

d’Ivoire, the Republic of Kenya, the Republic of Rwanda, 

the Republic of Sierra Leone, the Togolese Republic, and 

the Republic of Zambia; 

Whereas the Abraham Accords paved the way for further 

normalization agreements between Israel and other nations; 

Whereas Israel has supported African nations through economic investments and humanitarian assistance; and 

Whereas, on July 22, 2021, the African Union announced 

that Israel will join the African Union under observer 

status: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) encourages heightened cooperation between 

3 the State of Israel and African nations, particularly 

4 in areas that are significant in progress towards the 

5 implementation of the Sustainable Development 

6 Goals, such as economic growth, sustainable agri7 culture, and humanitarian development; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 344 IS 

1 (2) expects Israel’s observer status in the Afri2 can Union will help enable such cooperation to de3 velop between Israel and the African Union; 

4 (3) commends the African Union for granting 

5 Israel observer status in the African Union; and 

6 (4) thanks Felix Tshisekedi, the President of 

7 the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Chair of 

8 the African Union, for his leadership in strength9 ening Israel-African relations by ensuring the rec10 ognition of Israel under observer status occurred 

11 during his tenure as Chair of the African Union. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J UL Y 2, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 6 3 5 6 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 9

- 0 0 0 8 7

- C R

- 3

- L A C

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

H E N R Y R I C H A R D H A L E ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( J u l y 2 , 2 0 1 0 )

B e f o r e T J O F L A T , C A R N E S a n d W I L S O N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

C h e t K a u f

m a n , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r H e n r y R i c h a r d H a l e i n t h i s d i r e c tc r i m i n a l a p p e a l h a s m o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e

a p p e l l a n t , b e c a u s e , i n h i s o p i n i o n , t h e a p p e a l i s w i t h o u t m e r i t

. C o u n s e l h a s f i l e d a
b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d

4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s

a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t

e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s

m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d H a l e ’ s c o n v i c t i o n s a n d s e n t e n c e s a r e

A F F I R M E D

.

2
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 328 

Designating August 1, 2021, as ‘‘Gold Star Children’s Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2021 

Mr. WICKER (for himself and Mr. MANCHIN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating August 1, 2021, as ‘‘Gold Star Children’s Day’’. 

Whereas the recognition of Gold Star Families in the United 

States dates back to World War I, when the families of 

fallen service members displayed a service flag in the window of their homes with a gold star; 

Whereas, in 1936, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed 

into law legislation declaring Gold Star Mother’s Day, a 

national observance honoring the mothers of fallen service members annually on the last Sunday of September; 

Whereas, since 2010, the Senate has honored Gold Star 

Spouses by resolution annually on April 5, recognizing 

the unique sacrifices made by spouses of fallen service 

members; 

Whereas thousands of sons and daughters of military families 

have lost mothers or fathers who served in the Armed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 328 ATS 

Forces and also deserve national recognition for the burden and legacy they carry; and 

Whereas no date has existed to specifically recognize the children of fallen service members of the United States as 

part of a national debt of gratitude that the people of the 

United States owe to the service members who sacrificed 

all in protecting the freedom of the United States and 

the people of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates August 1, 2021, as ‘‘Gold Star 

3 Children’s Day’’; 

4 (2) honors the sacrifices and hardships of the 

5 children of fallen service members; and 

6 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to observe Gold Star Children’s Day in support of 

8 children of the fallen men and women of the Armed 

9 Forces of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Richard Bernard LATSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2391

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019.

Richard Bernard Latson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit      32**

**Certification**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| Dated: March                29, 2007 |                                                                                                                      |                                     |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                                                                      |                                     |
|                                      |                                                                                                                      | /s/ Frank                Mandelbaum |
|                                      | Name: Frank                Mandelbaum                                                                                |
|                                      | Title: Chief                  Executive Officer and                  Acting Chief Financial                  Officer |

**The      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of      the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter      63      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form      10-**
**K**
**      or as a separate disclosure document.**

 

----
Tony Deanglo JOYCE v. STATE

CR-17-0094

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGELIO MAY RUIZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL SEXTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00338-CRB 

ORDER ADDRESSING REQUEST 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION 

TOMOTION TO DISMISS AND 

REQUEST FOR PETITIONER TO 

FILE CDCR FILE

Respondent has filed a request for an extension of time to and including November 

22, 2018. Dkt. 28. This request is unopposed. Dkt. 29. The Court hereby grants 

Respondent’s request for an enlargement of time to and including November 22, 2018, in 

which to file and serve a reply to petitioner’s opposition to the motion to dismiss the 

habeas petition.

Respondent also requests that the Petitioner serve on Respondent the 3500 pages of 

the CDCR file. Dkt. 28. In counsel’s declaration in support of this request, counsel states 

that she “cannot accurately respond to the numerous assertions petitioner makes in his 

declaration, and which counsel argues in his brief, without access to the CDCR records,”

and “therefore request[s] that this Court order petitioner to file the CDCR records with the 

Court and serve them on respondent, and direct counsel to provide citations to the CDCR 

records for each of the assertions petitioner makes in his declaration.” Dkt. 28-1.

Respondent relies on Orthel v. Yates, 2011 WL 4026808 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 12, 2011), in 

which the “parties agreed to make a copy of the[CDCR] records for respondent.” Id. at *3. 

The Court also observed that “[a]t the hearing, petitioner’s counsel pointed out that it is 

respondent’s client who has the original records in the first place.” Id. at *3 n.1.
John DOE, a minor, BY AND THROUGH Paul DOE, his next friend and guardian and Paul Doe, individually, Appellants, v. DIOCESE OF VENICE IN FLORIDA, INC., a Non-Profit Florida Corporation; Diocese of Venice in Florida, a Corporation Sole; Bishop Dewane as Corporate Sole of the Diocese of Venice; and Robert Little, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-4795

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 41 

Allowing limited laptop computer access on the floor of the Senate during 

impeachment proceedings against Donald John Trump, former President 

of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Allowing limited laptop computer access on the floor of the 

Senate during impeachment proceedings against Donald 

John Trump, former President of the United States. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. LAPTOP COMPUTER ACCESS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—During impeachment proceedings 

4 against Donald John Trump, former President of the 

5 United States, laptop computers may be used on the floor 

6 of the Senate Chamber only in accordance with the fol7 lowing: 

8 (1) Two laptop computers may be used by the 

9 impeachment managers and their assistants. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 41 ATS 

1 (2) Two laptop computers may be used by the 

2 counsel for the former President of the United 

3 States and their assistants. 

4 (3) One laptop computer may be used by the 

5 President pro tempore and the assistants of the 

6 President pro tempore. 

7 (4) Laptop computers available to employees 

8 and officers of the Senate on the floor of the Senate 

9 Chamber during a regular session of the Senate may 

10 be used by such employees and officers as necessary. 

11 (b) USE OF LAPTOP COMPUTERS IN OTHER ROOMS

12 OF THE SENATE FLOOR.—During impeachment pro13 ceedings against Donald John Trump, former President 

14 of the United States, laptop computers may be used in 

15 other areas of the floor of the Senate (not including the 

16 Senate Chamber) by individuals described in paragraphs 

17 (1) through (4) of subsection (a) and, as determined nec18 essary, other employees and officers of the Senate. 

19 (c) ENFORCEMENT BY THE SERGEANT AT ARMS AND

20 DOORKEEPER.—The Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of 

21 the Senate shall take such actions as are necessary to en22 force this resolution. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Charles Anthony FOSTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0492

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit 10.47**
**Addendum to Employment Contract**
      Agreement made as of December 1, 2004, between Beverly Enterprises, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), and Jeffrey P. Freimark (the “Executive”);
      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Contract of December 31,2001 between them;
      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and understandings set forth hereinand for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is herebyacknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:
      1. Add a new section 4(b)(xiii) which reads: “Executive will continue as a participant in theCompany’s Enhanced Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan pursuant to its terms.”
      2. Add a new section 4(b)(xiv) which reads: “Executive will continue as a participant in theCompany’s Long Term Care Plan pursuant to its terms.”
      3. Add a new section 4(b)(xv) which reads: “Executive will continue as a participant in theCompany’s Executive Allowance Program pursuant to its terms.”
      4. Revise section 7(c)(ii) to read: “The Company shall maintain in force, at its own expense, forthe remainder of the Executive’s life, life insurance under the Company’s Executive Split DollarLife Insurance Plan in an amount not less than $300,000.00, naming the Executive as beneficiary,and payable to Executive’s estate upon death.”
      The parties have duly executed this Agreement to be effective as of the date first writtenabove.     Beverly Enterprises, Inc. Executive    By:         Chair, Nominating andCompensation Committee
EXHIBIT 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Optionable, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 26, 2005                              /s/ Marc-Andre Boisseau
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Marc-Andre Boisseau
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



  [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Optionable, Inc. and will be retained by Optionable, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]