alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23 TO FORM 10-KSB**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos.333-30677 and 333-69792) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-33527) of our report dated February 11, 2003, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and for the year ended December 31, 2002,which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

/s/ DIXON ODOM PLLC

Sanford, North CarolinaMarch 27,2003
Raymond D. IZQUIERDO, DOC #K62414, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-557 2D18-1207 CONSOLIDATED

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Terrick BATISTE

NO. 2019-KK-0438

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION UNDERSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of GTA-IB, LLC.
| Date: May 15, 2007 |   | /s/ W. Bradley Blair, II         |   |
|--------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | W. Bradley Blair, II             |
|               |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|               |   |                                  |
| Date: May 15, 2007 |   | /s/ Tracy S. Clifford                 |   |
|               |   | Tracy S. Clifford                     |
|               |   | Secretary and Principal Accounting    |
|               |   | Officer                               |

 

1

----
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 716

FTC’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of its Motion for Relief from 

Magistrate Judge’s Nondispositive Pretrial Order seeks to seal an exhibit that “Qualcomm has 

designated as Highly Confidential under the Protective Order.” ECF No. 716 at 2. However, 

“Qualcomm does not seek the sealing of the specific material that is the subject of the Motion for 

Relief.” ECF No. 726 at 2. Accordingly, FTC’s motion to seal is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 8, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 728 Filed 05/08/18 Page 1 of 1
Case 5:11-cv-06584-LHK   Document 17   Filed 02/21/12   Page 1 of 8

Case 5:11-cv-06584-LHK   Document 17   Filed 02/21/12   Page 2 of 8

Case 5:11-cv-06584-LHK   Document 17   Filed 02/21/12   Page 3 of 8

Case 5:11-cv-06584-LHK   Document 17   Filed 02/21/12   Page 4 of 8

Case 5:11-cv-06584-LHK   Document 17   Filed 02/21/12   Page 5 of 8

Case 5:11-cv-06584-LHK   Document 17   Filed 02/21/12   Page 6 of 8

Case 5:11-cv-06584-LHK   Document 17   Filed 02/21/12   Page 7 of 8

Case 5:11-cv-06584-LHK   Document 17   Filed 02/21/12   Page 8 of 8
Case 4:16-mj-71619-MAG Document 3 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      23.1




Logo1




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the use in the Form 10-KSB Annual Report of American Petro-Hunter,
      Inc. of our report, dated March 21, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance
      sheet as at December 31, 2006 and statements of operations, cash flows and
      stockholders’ deficiency for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period
      from January 24, 1996 (date of inception) to December 31, 2006.


Vancouver,
                  Canada
              “Morgan
                  & Company”April
                  14, 2008
              Chartered
                  Accountants





Tel:
                (604) 687-5841
              Fax:
                (604) 687-0075
              www.morgan-cas.com
            
            Logo2
            
            P.O.
                Box 10007 Pacific Centre
              Suite
                1488 - 700 West Georgia Street
              Vancouver,
                B.C. V7Y 1A1
STATE of Louisiana v. Keriana M. ALEXCEE

NO. 2019-K-0150

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

Denied.
Benjamin F. GRAHAM, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2988

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Deandrus JONES, et al.

18-911 18-909 18-910

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 5, 2019

Paul J. deMahy, 2206 Catherine Drive, St. Martinville, Louisiana 70582, (337) 519-5400, Counsel for Defendant/Appellant: American Surety Company

Keith Stutes, District Attorney, Emilia Salas Pardo, Assistant District Attorney, 800 S. Buchanan St., Lafayette, Louisiana 70501, (337) 232-5170, Counsel for Appellee: State of Louisiana

Court composed of D. Kent Savoie, Candyce G. Perret, and Jonathan W. Perry, Judges.

PERRY, Judge.

American Surety Company ("American") appeals the judgment of the trial court, forfeiting three appearance bonds American, as surety, posted on behalf of Deandrus Jones, its principal. For the reasons set forth in the consolidated case hereto, *State of Louisiana v. Deandrus Jones, et al.* , 18-909 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/5/19), --- So.3d ----, 2019 WL 2374002, the trial court's judgment in the current case, appellate docket 18-911, is affirmed. Costs in docket number 18-911 are assessed to American Surety Company.

**AFFIRMED.**
Molly C. Dwyer

Clerk of Court 

Office of the Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 

Post Office Box 193939

San Francisco, California 94119-3939

415-355-8000

June 03, 2019

No.: 19-16122

D.C. No.: 5:17-cv-00220-LHK

Short Title: FTC v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Dear Appellant/Counsel

A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of 

Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must 

indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with 

this court regarding this case. 

Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an 

order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court 

reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court.

The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal 

have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable 

FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the 

appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic 

dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1523 Filed 06/03/19 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

JUN 03 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, A 

Delaware corporation, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 19-16122

D.C. No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK

U.S. District Court for Northern 

California, San Jose

TIME SCHEDULE ORDER

The parties shall meet the following time schedule.

If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, crossdesignate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported 

hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply.

Mon., June 10, 2019 Mediation Questionnaire due. If your registration for 

Appellate ECF is confirmed after this date, the 

Mediation Questionnaire is due within one day of 

receiving the email from PACER confirming your 

registration.

Mon., July 1, 2019 Transcript shall be ordered.

Tue., July 30, 2019 Transcript shall be filed by court reporter.

Mon., September 9, 2019 Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record 

shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 

9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1523 Filed 06/03/19 Page 2 of 3
Tue., October 8, 2019 Appellee's answering brief and excerpts of record 

shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 

9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within 21 days of 

service of the appellee's brief, pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.

Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in 

automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. 

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: John Brendan Sigel

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1523 Filed 06/03/19 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0344 CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRUCE ALLEN WINCHESTER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 27, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court December 17 2020

12/17/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0344
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.         /s/ William J. Ryan       Name: William J. Ryan  Title: Chief Executive OfficerDate:August 9, 2005Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to TD Banknorth Inc. and will be retained by TD Banknorth Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
60
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL**

 

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LP**

 

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three and six monthsended June 30, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew S. Harrison, Chief FinancialOfficer, Vice President-Finance and Secretary of Hiland Partners GP, LLC, thegeneral partner of Hiland Partners, LP (the “Company”), hereby certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 11,  2008 | /s/ Matthew S. Harrison                                         |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Matthew S. Harrison                                             |
|                        | Chief Financial  Officer, Vice President-Finance  and Secretary |

 

----
\

i / ./

1 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

Daniel J. Furiss (State Bar No. 073531)

2 Ane M. Rogaski (State Bar No. 184754)

379 Lytton Avenue

3 Palo Alto, California 94301

Telephone: 650-326-2400

4 Facsimile: 650-326-2422

5 MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & POPEO P.C.

David Bannak

6 Melody A. Rosenberry

12010 Sunset Hils Road, Suite 900

7 i Reston, Virginia 20190

Telephone: 703-464-4800

8 Facsimile: 703-464-4895

9 Attorneys for Defendant

DIGEX, INe.

10

11

12

13

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

San Jose Division

15 JULIE WHITE, Case No. C-01-20985 JF (RS) ARB

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE

v.

DIGEX, INC., MAX NGUYEN, and

DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, by and through their respective counsel,

that plaintiff Julie Whte's First Amended Complaint against defendant Digex Inc. is hereby dismissed

24 with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 41(a). Each pary is to bear its own

25

26

27

28

attorneys' fees and costs.

- 1 -

CASE NO. C-OI-20985 JF (RS) ARB

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

**E-filed 9/5/06**

Case 5:01-cv-20985-JF Document 101 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 3
I'

1 DATED: July 24, 2006

2

3

4

5 ~. J.)

6 DATED: July 24: 2006

7

8

9

10

11

12

Respectfull y submitted,

ES OF BRIAl\. LEIGHTON

an C. Leighton

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JULIE WHITE

Respectfully submitted,

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

By: ll~

Daniel J. Furn s

Ane M. Rogaski

Attorneys for Defendant

DIGEX INCORPORATED

13

14

15

16 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

17 United Stated Distrct Court Judge

18 60828897 vI

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 II

- 2 -

CASE NO. c-o 1-20985 JF (RS) AR

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

8/31/06.

Case 5:01-cv-20985-JF Document 101 Filed 09/05/06 Page 2 of 3
1 Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest

2 under penalty of peijury that concurrence in the fiing of the document has been obtained from Brian

3 C. Leighton.

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TOWNSEND AN TOWNSEND AN CREW LLP BY:~

Ane M. Rogaski

Attorneys for Defendant DIGEX INCORPORATED

- 3 -

CASE NO. C-01-20985 JF (RS) ARB

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 5:01-cv-20985-JF Document 101 Filed 09/05/06 Page 3 of 3
# L_2017304EN.01006902.xml

| 21.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 304/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 304/69

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/659 of 6 April 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/141 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People's Republic of China and Taiwan

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 94 of 7 April 2017
  )

On page 9, in Article 1, the text replacing Article 1(1) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/141:

for:

‘1.   A definitive anti-dumping duty is imposed on imports of tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, of austenitic stainless steel grades, corresponding to AISI types 304, 304L, 316, 316L, 316Ti, 321 and 321H and their equivalent in the other norms, with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm and a wall thickness of 16 mm or less, with a roughness average (Ra) of the surface finish not less than 0,8 micrometres, not flanged, whether or not finished, originating in the PRC and Taiwan. The product falls under CN codes ex 7307 23 10 and ex 7307 23 90 (Taric codes 7307231015, 7307231025, 7307239015, 7307239025).’,

read:

‘1.   A definitive anti-dumping duty is imposed on imports of tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, of austenitic stainless steel grades, corresponding to AISI types 304, 304L, 316, 316L, 316Ti, 321 and 321H and their equivalent in the other norms, with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm and a wall thickness of 16 mm or less, with a roughness average (Ra) of the internal surface not less than 0,8 micrometres, not flanged, whether or not finished, originating in the PRC and Taiwan. The product falls under CN codes ex 7307 23 10 and ex 7307 23 90 (Taric codes 7307231015, 7307231025, 7307239015, 7307239025).’.

---
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) by China
Housing & Land Development, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Cangsang Huang,
hereby certify that:





1. To the
best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. To the
best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.




Dated:
      August 12, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Cangsang HuangName: Cangsang
      HuangTitle:  
      Principal Accounting Officer
William Henry BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-362

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2019

William Henry Brown, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Jennifer Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Roberts and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 5:17-cv-00354-NC Document 2 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 3
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 5:17-cv-00354-NC Document 2 Filed 01/24/17 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-354 

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION 

ATTACHMENT A 

Rotem Sabag 

Chief Executive Officer 

Locksmith 911 Services, Inc. 

360 S. Market Street, #1003 

San Jose, California 95113 

Locksmith 911 Services, Inc. 

a California Corporation 

c/o its Registered Agent 

Rotem Sabag 

360 S. Market Street, #1003 

San Jose, California 95113 

Case 5:17-cv-00354-NC Document 2 Filed 01/24/17 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of OmniReliant Holdings Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Report”), I, Paul Morrison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      February 5, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Paul
      MorrisonPaul
      MorrisonChief
      Executive Officer
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 18 / Wednesday, January 29, 2025 / Presidential Documents 8337 

Executive Order 14150 of January 20, 2025 

America First Policy Directive to the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: 

Section 1. Purpose. From this day forward, the foreign policy of the United 

States shall champion core American interests and always put America 

and American citizens first. 

Sec. 2. Policy. As soon as practicable, the Secretary of State shall issue 

guidance bringing the Department of State’s policies, programs, personnel, 

and operations in line with an America First foreign policy, which puts 

America and its interests first. 

Sec. 3. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed 

to impair or otherwise affect: 

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency; 

or 

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. 

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and 

subject to the availability of appropriations. 

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party 

against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, 

employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

January 20, 2025. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01952 

Filed 1–28–25; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PRESDOC4Trump.EPS</GPH>