alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 148 

Recognizing the importance of paying tribute to those individuals who have 

faithfully served and retired from the Armed Forces of the United 

States, designating April 18, 2021, as ‘‘Military Retiree Appreciation 

Day’’, and encouraging the people of the United States to honor the 

past and continued service of military retirees to their local communities 

and the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 12, 2021 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. COTTON, Mr. KAINE, Ms. HASSAN, 

and Mr. MURPHY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of paying tribute to those individuals who have faithfully served and retired from the 

Armed Forces of the United States, designating April 

18, 2021, as ‘‘Military Retiree Appreciation Day’’, and 

encouraging the people of the United States to honor 

the past and continued service of military retirees to 

their local communities and the United States. 

Whereas there are approximately 2,100,000 retirees of the 

Armed Forces of the United States who have earned 

their retirement through career service, a service-connected disability, or both; 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 148 IS 

Whereas military retirees show an unrivaled dedication to 

service, having faithfully served their country and dedicated much of their lives knowing that at any moment 

they could be sent anywhere in the world and possibly 

asked to make the ultimate sacrifice to protect and defend the national security of the United States; 

Whereas military retirees, through their perseverance and 

dedication— 

(1) have proven to be leaders who are resilient, focused, disciplined, well-trained, and well-educated; and 

(2) bring to lifelong service within their national and 

local communities the best qualities of citizens in the 

United States by being dependable, responsible citizens 

and neighbors; 

Whereas the qualities of a military retiree often result in 

positive contributions to— 

(1) the civilian workforce, as experienced and knowledgeable employees; 

(2) local educational institutions, as teachers, counselors, and coaches; 

(3) local government, as elected public servants; and 

(4) communities, as dedicated and effective volunteers; 

Whereas the dedication and focus of military retirees helps 

strengthen and stabilize local communities; and 

Whereas the contributions of military retirees to their communities are the manifestation of the desire of the retirees to continue their selfless acts of volunteering and 

their lifelong service to the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 148 IS 

1 (1) designates April 18, 2021, as ‘‘Military Re2 tiree Appreciation Day’’; and 

3 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

4 to honor the past and continued service of military 

5 retirees to their local communities and the United 

6 States through appropriate ceremonies and other ac7 tivities. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

 

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

 APPLICANT 

 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

IN RE: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA

BREACH SECURITY LITIGATION

16-02752-LHK

Rachel M. Bohman

Rachel M. Bohman

Rachel M. Bohman

Minnesota

Plaintiffs

Gayle M. Blatt

100 Washington Ave S., Suite 2200

Minneapolis, MN 55401

110 Laurel Street

San Diego, CA 92101

(612) 339-6900 619-238-1811

rmbohman@locklaw.com gmb@cglaw.com

321102

04/13/2017

May 4, 2017

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 87 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.0

                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of
Louisiana (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of Daniel R. Herndon, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Clyde D. Patterson, Executive Vice President (principal financial
officer), of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2006               /s/ Daniel R. Herndon
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Daniel R. Herndon
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: November 14, 2006               /s/ Clyde D. Patterson
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Clyde D. Patterson
                                      Executive Vice President
                                      (principal financial officer)

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act has been provided to Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of
Louisiana and will be retained by Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2527

DOUGLAS E. LITTLE, Personal Representative for the Estate of 

Theodore B. Gould,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Commissioner of Internal Revenue 

John Koskinen; LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior 

District Judge. (3:15-cv-00038-NKM)

Submitted: October 28, 2016 Decided: December 16, 2016

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul M. Donovan, LAROE, WINN, MOERMAN & DONOVAN, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellant. Caroline D. Ciraolo, Acting Assistant Attorney 

General, Bridget M. Rowan, Sherra Wong, Tax Division, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Douglas E. Little, as personal representative for the Estate 

of Theodore B. Gould, appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing Gould’s complaint on the basis of sovereign immunity 

and res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Gould v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00038-

NKM (W.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2

Quinenco S.A.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:

1.    I am the Chief Financial Officer of Quinenco S.A.(the "Company").

2.    The Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 2002
      accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
      "Exchange Act"); and

3.    The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

      Dated: June 25, 2003


                                                       /s/ Luis Fernando Antunez
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Luis Fernando Antunez
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
Case 5:17-cv-00246-HRL Document 12 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 2

HRL January 24, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan Y. Soong Case 5:17-cv-00246-HRL Document 13 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:17-cv-00246-HRL Document 12 Filed 01/24/17 Page 2 of 2

HRL

Case 5:17-cv-00246-HRL Document 13 Filed 01/24/17 Page 2 of 2
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

 

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No: _______________

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3) 

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Reset Form

SIX4THREE, LLC, 3:17-cv-00359

FACEBOOK, INC.

James E. Kruzer

James E. Kruzer

James E. Kruzer

Mass. Supreme Judicial Ct

Plaintiff Six4Three, LLC

Basil P. Fthenakis

Birnbaum & Godkin, LLP

280 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210

Criterion Law, 2225 E. Bayshore Road, Suite

200, Palo Alto, CA 994303

(617) 307-6100 (650) 352-8400

kruzer@birnbaumgodkin.com bpf@criterionlaw.com

670827

01/25/17

-WHA

January 26, 2017.

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 9 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 1
Philip James HAMMAC, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3043

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Carl PURYEAR v. STATE

CR-16-1120

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Milton Leon HAMBRIGHT v. STATE

CR-16-0896

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Allan W. Stone, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June, 30, 2010, of Valley Commerce Bancorp;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 139-15(f) and 15-d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:





(a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b.) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c.) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter of 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and







5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a.) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b.) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date: August 10, 2010





/s/ Allan W. StoneAllan W. Stone

President and Chief Executive Officer
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

Vaughn Management & Services, Inc. 

Under Contract No. NOOl 78-07-D-5291 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 60319, 61079 

William A. Musto, Esq. 

Roeder & Cochran, PLLC 

McLean, VA 

James S. DelSordo, Esq. 

Argus Legal, PLLC 

Manassas, VA 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

John M. Davis, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Port Hueneme, CA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 7 August 2017 

DA YID D' ALESSANDRIS 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60319, 61079, Appeals of Vaughn 

Management & Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREYD. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
e4-

AT:77-

14/4,.)1. 1\11. 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0215 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

MATTHEW JASON WELCH, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

OCT 0 4 2022 

Bowen Greenwood Cltar, of Supreme Court 

1VInntana 

ORDER 

Appellant Matthew Jason Welch has appealed from the Judgment of the Thirteenth 

Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, in its Cause No. DC-20-1434. The parties, 

by and through their respective counsel, now stipulate and jointly move for an order 

dismissing this appeal and remanding this matter to the District Court. 

The parties assert that remand is warranted for two reasons. First, the sentence the 

District Court imposed on Counts III, V, VI, and X exceed the maximum possible penalty. 

Second. the court included certain financial and probation conditions in the written 

judgment that were not imposed during the oral pronouncement of sentence. 

The parties assert that Welch pled guilty to six counts of Deceptive Practices under 

§ 45-6-317, MCA, and four counts of Theft by Deception under § 45-6-301(2), MCA. The 

District Court sentenced him to ten years in Montana State Prison with five years 

suspended on each count with the sentences to run consecutively to one another and to all 

other sentences. However, the parties further assert that the statutory maximum possible 

penalty on Counts III, V, VI, and X is three years, not ten, because of the value of the 

property at issue. 

The parties further assert that in its written judgment, the court imposed financial 

and probation conditions 13(e), 13(h), 19, 23, 24, and 25, which were not part of its oral 

pronouncement. 

10/04/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0215
Thus, the parties have stipulated and jointly moved that this Court remand this 

matter to the District Court with instructions to resentence Welch on Counts III, V, VI, and 

X within the statutory parameters and to strike conditions 13(e), 13(h), 19, 23, 24, and 25 

from the written judgment in this matter. 

Based on the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Thirteenth Judicial 

District Court, Yellowstone County, with instructions for the District Court to resentence 

Defendant Matthew Jason Welch on Counts III, V, VI, and X within the statutory 

parameters for those offenses. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the District Court amend its Judgment to conform 

with its oral pronouncement, as set forth above. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that REMITTITUR shall issue IMMEDIATELY 

UPON REMAND. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

presiding judge Honorable Donald L. Harris. 

Dated this 4th day of October, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

LA ani/ or

Justices 

2
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 510 

Recognizing January 25, 2022, as ‘‘National Poll Worker Recruitment Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2022 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CASEY, Mr. 

COONS, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. FISCHER, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Mr. HAGERTY, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. KAINE, Mr. KELLY, 

Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. PADILLA, Ms. SMITH, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WARNER, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. 

DURBIN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing January 25, 2022, as ‘‘National Poll Worker 

Recruitment Day’’. 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes January 25, 2022, as ‘‘National 

3 Poll Worker Recruitment Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the need for, and appreciation of, 

5 the service of poll workers; and 

6 (3) encourages eligible people to help America 

7 vote in the 2022 elections by serving as poll workers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Jose Luis HUERTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 09

- 00711

- CR

IN RE Damaso PECHE, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceedings 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca S immons , Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 17, 2010

DISMISSED

On January 6, 2010, the Honorable Oscar J. Hale entered an order granting Relator’s

Motion for Modification Judgment of Conviction. In accordance with said order, Relator’s

Petition for Writ of Mandamus is Dismissed as Moot.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006

- CRP

- 000876 , styled State of Texas v. Damso Peche, Jr.

, pending in the 406th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable O.J. Hale, Jr. presiding.