alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horse Sense Stable Services,
Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  October 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Sara
High, Treasurer/Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Sara High
Sara High
Director, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)


December 16, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>




               GUANGZHOU GENGHAI TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.
                            NO. 1509 HANGYUN BUILDING
                               48, 2 ROAD, BA QI,
                                  GUANGZHOU PRC




                                                                 August 12, 2003



Centre Capital Corp.
285 Silver Birch Avenue
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4E 3L6:

To Centre Capital Corp.

         It has come to the attention of the undersigned that the
representations and warranties set forth in Sections 2.01(o)(ii) and (r) of the
Share Exchange and Reorganization Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2003, between
Centre Capital Corp., a Nevada corporation ("Centre"), and Guangzhou Gengahi
Technology Development Co. Ltd., a People's Republic of China ("PRC")
corporation ("Genghai"), and the shareholders of Genghai, each of which is
identified in Schedule A thereto (the "Genghai Shareholders"), as amended by
Amendment No. 1, dated as of July 15, 2003 (as amended, the "Agreement')
relating to the reporting obligations of Centre under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), are materially incorrect in so far
as Centre is a reporting company under the Exchange Act.

         Accordingly, the parties to the Agreement hereby agree that it shall be
an additional condition to the obligations of Genghai and the Genghai
Shareholders under the Agreement that Centre receive from the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission written assurance, in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to Genghai, that the procedure recommended by Genghai to
cause Centre to comply with the Exchange Act will not in any material way limit
the ability of Centre following the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the Agreement to offer securities in offerings registered under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether on Form S-1, SB-2, S-8 or
otherwise.





<PAGE>




                                               Sincerely,

                                               GUANHZHOU GENGHAI TECHNOLOGY
                                               DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.



                                               By_________________________
                                                 Name: Zhijian Lu
                                                 Title: Director


                                               GENGHAI SHAREHOLDERS:



                                               ---------------------------
                                               Name: Zhijian Lu



                                               ---------------------------
                                               Name: Wu Ge



                                               ---------------------------
                                               Name: Luofeng Wang



                                               ---------------------------
                                               Name: Xiujian Huang
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 27 Filed 05/25/2005 Page 1 of 8

GW Equity LLC et al v. PBS Global Inc et al Doc. 27

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 27 Filed 05/25/2005 Page 2 of 8
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 27 Filed 05/25/2005 Page 3 of 8
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 27 Filed 05/25/2005 Page 4 of 8
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 27 Filed 05/25/2005 Page 5 of 8
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 27 Filed 05/25/2005 Page 6 of 8
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 27 Filed 05/25/2005 Page 7 of 8
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 27 Filed 05/25/2005 Page 8 of 8
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Financial Condition 

June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 

(unaudited) 

June 30

2008

December 31

2007

Assets 

 Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 1,035,623,291 $ 479,926,476

 Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 1,587,274,151 1,906,452,561

 Accrued Interest Receivable 16,598,168 21,215,825

 Premiums Receivable 106,194,000 191,341,000

Total Assets $ 2,745,689,610 $ 2,598,935,862

Liabilities and Insurance Fund 

 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 173,723 $ 392,676

 Farm Credit Insurance Fund 

 Allocated Insurance Reserve Accounts 39,888,431 39,888,431

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 2,705,627,456 2,558,654,755

 Total Insurance Fund 2,745,515,887 2,598,543,186

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 2,745,689,610 $ 2,598,935,862
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Revenue and Expense 

For the Period Ended June 30, 2008 

(unaudited) 

Calendar Year To Date

June 30, 2008

Income 

 Premiums $ 106,194,000

 Interest Income on Investments 42,025,527

Total Income $ 148,219,527

Expenses 

 Administrative Operating Expenses $ 1,246,825

Total Expenses $ 1,246,825

Net Income $ 146,972,702
Stephen BREWSTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0754

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 14, 2019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY 

OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 14, 2019

Re: Dkt. Nos. 1250, 1251

Before the Court are the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) high priority objections 

(“HPO”) and responses, ECF No. 1251, and Qualcomm Inc.’s (“Qualcomm”) HPOs and 

responses, ECF No. 1250, for January 14, 2019, day 5 of the trial. Having considered the parties’ 

briefs, the relevant law, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the record in this case, and balancing the 

factors set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules as follows:

FTC Objections Ruling

Marvin Blecker, former Qualcomm

FTC HPO #1: Blecker Dep., 43:4-9, 108:16-19, 

108:22-109:3

SUSTAINED. 

Jeff Williams, Apple 

FTC HPO #2: QX9121 SUSTAINED. 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1267 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 14, 2019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Qualcomm Objections Ruling

Jeff Williams, Apple

Qualcomm HPO #1: CX5363 SUSTAINED as to CX5363-001 to 

CX5363-005, but OVERRULED as to 

CX5363-006 to CX5363-018.

Richard Donaldson, FTC Expert 

Qualcomm HPO #2: CX0101 OVERRULED.

Qualcomm HPO #3: CX0104 OVERRULED.

Michael Lasinski, FTC Expert

Qualcomm HPO #4: Lasinski Demonstrative Slide 

re: HTC 

OVERRULED.

Prof. Carl Shapiro, FTC Expert

Qualcomm HPO #5: CX0102 OVERRULED. 

Qualcomm HPO #6: CX0103 OVERRULED. 

Qualcomm HPO #7: CX0105 OVERRULED.

Marvin Blecker, former Qualcomm

Qualcomm HPO #8: CX6436 OVERRULED, but emails from Mr. Zhang 

may not be admitted for the truth of the 

matter asserted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1267 Filed 01/11/19 Page 2 of 2
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Yulong Guo, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| |    

/s/ Yulong GuoYulong GuoPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJuly 7, 2008

---
**EXHIBIT 12****COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**          The following table sets forth the computation of consolidated ratios of earnings to fixedcharges for TD Banknorth Inc. for the periods shown.                   Successor  Combined (1)  Combined (1)  Predecessor   Six Months Ended  Six Months Ended  Year Ended  Year Ended   June 30, 2006  June 30, 2005  December 31, 2005  December 31, 2004      **Earnings:**                Earnings before income taxes and change in accounting principle $250,654  $199,151  $416,406  $467,740 Fixed charges excluding interest on deposits  124,521   91,101   182,118   170,281      Earnings including fixed charges but excluding interest on deposits  375,175   290,252   598,524   638,021 Interest on deposits  241,471   93,569   228,596   161,004      Earnings including fixed charges and interest on deposits $616,646  $383,821  $827,120  $799,025                       **Fixed Charges:**                Interest expense, excluding interest on deposits $118,573  $87,161  $174,293  $162,619 Interest within rent expense (1/3 rent expense)  5,948   3,940   7,825   7,662      Fixed charges excluding interest on deposits  124,521   91,101   182,118   170,281 Interest on deposits  241,471   93,569   228,596   161,004      Fixed charges including interest on deposits $365,992  $184,670  $410,714  $331,285                       **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:**                Including interest expense on deposits  1.68x   2.08x   2.01x   2.41x Excluding interest expense on deposits  3.01x   3.19x   3.29x   3.75x  (1) Information for the six months ended June 30, 2005 andfor the year ended December 31, 2005 is based on the combinedoperations of TD Banknorth’s predecessor, Banknorth Group, Inc. for theperiod January 1,2005 to February 28, 2005 and the operations of TD Banknorth as successor for the periodMarch 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005 and the period March 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 following TD Banknorth’sapplication of the purchasemethod of accounting to account for the transaction which resulted in TD Banknorth becoming amajority-owned subsidiary of The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
58
NINE MONTHSENDED
    
    
    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)FIXED CHARGES:Interest costs
    
    $
    10,282
    
    
    $
    13,696
    
    
    $
    13,620
    
    
    $
    6,766
    
    
    $
    6,711
    
    
    $
    4,692Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    260
    
    
    
    1,558Total fixed charges
    
    $
    10,282
    
    
    $
    13,696
    
    
    $
    13,620
    
    
    $
    6,766
    
    
    
    6,971
    
    
    
    6,250EARNINGS:Net income
    
    $
    11,458
    
    
    $
    11,707
    
    
    $
    21,464
    
    
    $
    21,913
    
    
    $
    20,351
    
    
    $
    5,913Add fixed charges per above
    
    
    10,282
    
    
    
    13,696
    
    
    
    13,620
    
    
    
    6,766
    
    
    
    6,971
    
    
    
    6,250Less capitalized interest per
above
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (260
    )
    
    
    (1,558
    )Total earnings, as adjusted
    
    $
    21,740
    
    
    $
    25,403
    
    
    $
    35,084
    
    
    $
    28,679
    
    
    $
    27,062
    
    
    $
    10,605RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
CHARGES
    
    
    2.11
    
    
    
    1.85
    
    
    
    2.58
    
    
    
    4.24
    
    
    
    3.88
    
    
    
    1.70
THOMAS MACHINERY, INC., Petitioner, v. AINSWORTH INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Respondent.

No. 3D19-0013

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz, LLP, and Jordan A. Shaw and Kimberly A. Slaven (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner.

Joseph E. Altschul, LLC, and Joseph E. Altschul and Alexandria L. Beaton (Pembroke Pines), for respondent.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

*ON MOTION TO DISMISS*

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, defendant below, Thomas Machinery, Inc., seeks certiorari review of *190a non-final order of the trial court denying Petitioner's motion for leave to file an amended answer and affirmative defenses. We grant Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition because we lack certiorari jurisdiction to review the subject order; any error in denying Petitioner's leave to amend its pleadings is reviewable on plenary appeal. *Harry Pepper & Assocs., Inc. v. City of Cape Coral*, 369 So.2d 969, 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Petition dismissed.
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 23 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention relating to ‘‘Temporary Halt in Residential Evictions in Communities with Substantial or High Transmission of COVID–19 To Prevent the Further Spread of COVID–19’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 10, 2021 

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention relating to 

‘‘Temporary Halt in Residential Evictions in Communities with Substantial or High Transmission of COVID– 

19 To Prevent the Further Spread of COVID–19’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Cen4 ters for Disease Control and Prevention relating to ‘‘Tem5 porary Halt in Residential Evictions in Communities with 

6 Substantial or High Transmission of COVID–19 To PreVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:56 Aug 11, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ23.IS SJ23

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 23 IS 

1 vent the Further Spread of COVID–19’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 

2 43244 (August 6, 2021)) and printed in the Congressional 

3 Record on August 10, 2021, and such rule shall have no 

4 force or effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 49 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 49

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
    military sale to the Government of Australia of certain defense 
                         articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2022

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
    military sale to the Government of Australia of certain defense 
                         articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Government of Australia is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 22-28, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on May 26, 2022:
                    (A) The following Major Defense Equipment (MDE): 
                Twenty (20) M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System 
                (HIMARS). Thirty (30) M30A2 Guided Multiple Launch 
                Rocket System (GMLRS). Thirty (30) Alternative Warhead 
                (AW) Pods with Insensitive Munitions Propulsion Systems 
                (IMPS). Thirty (30) M31A2 GMLRS Unitary (GMLRS-U) High 
                Explosive Pods with IMPS. Thirty (30) XM403 Extended 
                Range (ER)-GMLRS AW Pods. Thirty (30) EM404 ER GMLRS 
                Unitary Pods. Ten (10) M57 Army Tactical Missile System 
                (ATACMS).
                    (B) The following non-MDE: Reduced Range Practice 
                Rocket Pods (RRPRP); Vehicular Intercom System (AN/VIC-
                3) 3-Station; radio communication mounts; machine gun 
                mounts; battle management system vehicle integration 
                kits; wheel guards; ruggedized laptops; training 
                equipment publications; spare and repair parts; support 
                equipment; tools; test equipment; technical data; U.S. 
                Government and contractor support; technical and 
                logistical support services; and other related elements 
                of program and logistic support.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 25 (Friday, February 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02403]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's Committee on Awards and Facilities 
(A&F) hereby gives notice of the scheduling of meetings for the 
transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National 
Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: The A&F meeting will be held on Monday, February 10, 
2025. The open session will be from 2:30 p.m.-3:00 p.m. The closed 
session will be from 3:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.

PLACE: The meetings will be held at NSF headquarters, 2145 Eisenhower 
Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314, and by videoconference.

STATUS: One session is open, and one session is closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    A&F open session agenda: Opening Remarks; Information Item: Summit 
Station Recapitalization.
    A&F closed session agenda: Opening Remarks regarding the agenda; 
Discussion and Vote: National Radio Astronomy Observatory Operations 
and Maintenance Award Authorization Level Increase; Context Item: Mid-
scale Research Infrastructure Program Track 2; Context Item: National 
Geophysical Facility.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Michelle McCrackin, [email protected], (703) 292-7000. Members of 
the public can observe the public portion of this meeting through a 
YouTube livestream: https://youtube.com/live/45FMoMrZar8?feature=share.

Ann E. Bushmiller,
Senior Legal Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2025-02403 Filed 2-5-25; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
Cortney L. WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version file d by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3

v. NO. 31,242 4 JOSEPH MARTINEZ, 5 Defendant-Appellee. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Denise Barela Shepherd, District Judge 8 Gary K. King, Attorney General 9 Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General 10 Joel Jacobsen, Assistant Attorney General 11 Santa Fe, NM 12 for Appellant 13 Bregman & Loman, P.C. 14 Eric Loman 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 VANZI, Judge. 192 Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is granted. The memorandum opinion filed 1 in this case on February 15, 2012, is hereby withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted 2 in its place. 3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed disposition. The State has informed us that it does not oppose the proposed 5 result, although it has also asked us to provide clarification on a single point. As 6 requested, we clarify that we do not decide wh at effect, if any, the trial court’s order 7 has on the alleged victim’s right to freel y testify in any future proceeding. 8 AFFIRMED. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10

__________________________________ 11 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 12 WE CONCUR: 13

_________________________________ 14 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 15

_________________________________ 16 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 17
Kurt A. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3414

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137141 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137141 

 COA: 286109 

Kent CC: 03-002380-FH 

DAVID RONALD ECKMYRE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk