alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
shall not be required at any time to file a registration statementfor less than 50,000 shares issued upon exercise of Warrants; or(ii) prior to exercise of the Warrants by Advisor if the Companydetermines, in its sole discretion, that it is then eligible to usea Form S-3 registration statement for such registration.Determination of compliance with registration requirements underFederal and State securities laws will be at the sole discretion ofthe Company. To the extent the shares issuable upon exercise are notregistered prior to issuance, they will bear a legend restrictingtransfer. The Warrants will not be transferable, other than to anaffiliate (as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended) of the Advisor (so long as such affiliate is an“accredited investor” as defined below and agrees to be bound by theterms and provisions of this Agreement and the Warrant agreement asif, and to the fullest extent as, the Advisor, and will bear alegend to that effect. The Company reasonably believes that allinformation it provides to Advisor is accurate and complete in allmaterial respects. Company acknowledges that Advisor shall beentitled to rely on all such information and materials.     2. The Advisor hereby represents and warrants that the representations in Paragraph 5 of theAgreement are true and correct as of the date of this Amendment.     3. The remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without change inaccordance with the terms thereof until further amended in accordance with the Agreement.     4. Any capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning setforth in the Agreement.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day andyear first above written.“COMPANY”ROCKWELL MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC./s/ Robert L. Chioini
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Stream Global Services, Inc. 

Wellesley, MA 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-152646) of Stream Global Services, Inc. (formerly Global BPO Services Corp.) of our report dated March 17, 2008, relating to the 2007 consolidated financial statements of Stream Global Services, Inc.(formerly Global BPO Services Corp.), which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/    BDO Seidman, LLP 

Boston, MA 

March 13, 2009
Robert JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-313

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 25, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 9 PageID 490
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 9 PageID 491
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 3 of 9 PageID 492
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 4 of 9 PageID 493
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 5 of 9 PageID 494
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 6 of 9 PageID 495
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 7 of 9 PageID 496
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 8 of 9 PageID 497
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00292-M Document 28 Filed 08/16/06 Page 9 of 9 PageID 498
Demetrius MC LAUGHLIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Thomas M. KNIGHT, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1705

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO Rule 15d-14(d) I, Brennen Willingham, certify that:  1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Fifth Third Auto Trust 2023-1 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);  2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under
Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of
Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and  5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




---

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following
unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association and U.S. Bank Trust National Association. March 27, 2024  Fifth Third Holdings Funding, LLC, as DepositorBy:

/s/ Brennen WillinghamName: Brennen WillinghamTitle: President(senior officer in charge of securitization)
   Certification pursuant to
Rule 15d-14(d) (FTAT 2023-1)
David L. OSTEEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4655

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Accepted. Belated appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Tian Ling, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xinyinhai Technology, Ltd.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: November 7, 2007 /s/ Tian Ling Tian Ling, Chief Executive Officer
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                State Cooperative Programs

State Cooperative Programs

                        FDA Grade "A" Milk Safety Program
          FDA National Shellfish Sanitation Program
          FDA Retail Food Protection Program Home
          For Federal, State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Officials
          State Cooperative Programs
          FDA Retail Food Protection ProgramState Cooperative Programs FDA Retail Food Protection Program
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintThis page should redirect you to the Retail Food Regulatory Program page. If it does not refresh, please click here.

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      06/12/2019State Cooperative Programs

          
                        FDA Grade "A" Milk Safety Program
          FDA National Shellfish Sanitation Program
          FDA Retail Food Protection Program
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Page 1 of 3

Notice of Appeal

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Walt Pennington

State Bar No 214470

Pennington Law Firm

3302 30th Street

San Diego, CA 92104-4535

Telephone: 619 940 6157

Email: wpennington@pennfirm.com

Attorney for Aspic Engineering and Construction Company, Petitioner and Appellant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

This document gives notice that the Petitioner, Aspic Engineering and Construction 

Company appeal from the final judgment or order entered by the District Court named above on 

July 18, 2017 vacating the arbitration award.

This appeal is made to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

July 26, 2017,

by Walt Pennington___________

Walt Pennington (#214470)

Pennington Law Firm

3302 30th Street

San Diego, CA 92104-4535

619 940 6157

wpennington@pennfirm.com

Attorney for Aspic Engineering and Construction Company, Petitioner and Appellant

ASPIC ENGINEERING AND 

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

Petitioner,

v. 

ECC CENTCOM CONSTRUCTORS 

LLC, et. al

Respondents

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 4:17-cv-00224-YGR

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Case 4:17-cv-00224-YGR Document 46 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Notice of Appeal

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned does hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Notice of Appeal was sent via CM/ECF on July 26, 2017 to the following:

ANDREW S. AZARMI (SBN 241407)

DENTONS US LLP

One Market Plaza

Spear Tower, 24th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Attorney for ECC International LLC and

ECC Centcom Constructors LLC

JOSEPH G. MARTINEZ (admitted pro hac vice)

DENTONS US LLP

1400 Wewatta Street

Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Attorney for ECC International LLC and ECC

Centcom Constructors LLC

/s/ Walt Pennington

Walt Pennington

Case 4:17-cv-00224-YGR Document 46 Filed 07/26/17 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Notice of Appeal

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 4:17-cv-00224-YGR Document 46 Filed 07/26/17 Page 3 of 3
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

AppeaJ of --

Fr. Kieran Mandato 

Under Contract No. M00264-15-P-0319 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61516 

Maj Gen Steven J. Lepper, USAF (Ret.) 

Merritt Island, FL 

Craig D. Jensen, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

John M. Sabatino, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Quantico Area Counsel Office 

Quantico, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: October 15, 2018 

Administrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61516, Appeal of Fr. Kieran 

Mandato, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 975 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 975

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 
        credit for alternative fuel vehicle refueling property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2021

Mr. Carper (for himself, Mr. Burr, Ms. Cortez Masto, and Ms. Stabenow) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 
        credit for alternative fuel vehicle refueling property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing America's Clean Fuels 
Infrastructure Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE REFUELING 
              PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (g) of section 30C of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2021'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2029''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2021.

SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF CREDIT LIMITATION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 30C of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``with respect to all'' and inserting 
        ``with respect to any single item of'',
            (2) by striking ``at a location'', and
            (3) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$30,000 in the case of 
        a property'' and inserting ``$200,000 in the case of any such 
        item of property''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
Peter Allen ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-202

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 14, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 31, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 1, 2019

Peter Allen Anderson, Indiantown, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Due to Appellant's apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment(s) and sentence(s) in Seminole County Circuit Court Case Number 14-CF-0877-A, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. *See* *State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.

Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. *See* *Isley v. State* , 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough."). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. *See* § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; *Simpkins v. State* , 909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.

COHEN, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (RegistrationNo.’s. 333-135872 and 333-148601) and Forms S-8 (Registration No.’s 333-66791, 333-126627,333-135896, and 333-146817) of Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 20,2008 on the consolidated financial statements of Rockwell Medical Technologies, Inc. as of and forthe years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RockwellMedical Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ Plante & Moran, PLLCAuburn Hills, Michigan
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN F KELLY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00485-WHO 

ORDER SETTING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00574-WHO

ORDER SETTING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

I would like to hold a Case Management Conference on December 11, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. to 

consider how to proceed with the issue that has been remanded by the Ninth Circuit, namely, 

whether a nationwide injunction is appropriate in this case. The parties shall file a Joint Case 

Management Statement on December 4, 2018 that outlines their proposed procedure(s) and the 

proposed timing thereof. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 8, 2018

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 219 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 1
1

Opinion issued November 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00713-CV

———————————

IN RE MID-CON ENERGY OPERATING, LLC, MID-CON ENERGY 

PARTNERS, LP, REPUBLIC INDUSTRIAL AND ENERGY SOLUTIONS 

LLC, AND QUAIL WELL SERVICE, INC., Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Mid-Con Energy Operating, LLC, Mid-Con Energy Partners, LP, 

Republic Industrial and Energy Solutions LLC, and Quail Well Service, Inc., have 

filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, challenging the trial court’s May 5, 2020 
2

order denying their “Joint Motion to Compel Independent Medical Examinations 

and Request for Neuropsychologic Raw Test Data.”1 

We deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Farris.

1 The underlying case is Fernando Lawhon v. Republic Industrial and Energy 

Solutions LLC, Mid-Con Energy Operating, LLC, Mid-Con Energy Partners, LP,

Smart Move LLC, and Quail Well Service, Inc., Cause No. 2018-26435, in the 61st 

District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Fredericka Phillips presiding.