alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PokerTek, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher J.C.
Halligan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
14, 2009





/s/
      Christopher J.C. HalliganChristopher
      J.C. HalliganChief
      Executive Officer
Marcus Cortez COLEMAN v. STATE

CR-16-0937

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 448 

Designating November 19, 2021, as ‘‘TSA Appreciation Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2021 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. PORTMAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 19, 2021, as ‘‘TSA Appreciation 

Day’’. 

Whereas November 19, 2021, marks the 20th anniversary of 

the signing of the Aviation and Transportation Security 

Act (Public Law 107–71; 115 Stat. 597) by President 

George W. Bush, creating the Transportation Security 

Administration (commonly known as the ‘‘TSA’’); 

Whereas, after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, 

the TSA was established with the mission to prevent 

similar attacks and restore confidence in air travel; 

Whereas, for 20 years, employees and officers of the TSA 

have been on the front lines ensuring safety in the skies 

and for the traveling public; 

Whereas, during the COVID–19 pandemic, the TSA quickly 

adjusted its security operations in order to meet current 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 448 IS 

and future security needs of transportation systems in 

the United States; 

Whereas, throughout the COVID–19 pandemic, the TSA has 

remained on the front lines at airports in the United 

States; 

Whereas more than 10,000 employees of the TSA have tested 

positive for COVID–19, and more than 30 employees of 

the TSA have lost their lives to COVID–19; and 

Whereas the people of the United States will continue to be 

able to rely upon the vigilance of the TSA in the face of 

future unknown threats: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates November 19, 2021, as ‘‘TSA 

3 Appreciation Day’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes— 

5 (A) the service and sacrifices made by em6 ployees and officers of the Transportation Secu7 rity Administration; and 

8 (B) the role such employees and officers 

9 play in keeping the United States secure. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 316 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 

AO Alfa-Bank v. John Doe, et al. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel 

in the case of AO Alfa-Bank v. John Doe, et al. 

Whereas, in the case of AO Alfa-Bank v. John Doe, et al., 

Case No. 50–2020–CA–006304, pending in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Florida, the 

plaintiff has issued two subpoenas for deposition testimony and document production to Thomas Kirk McConnell, a staff member of the Committee on Armed Services; 

Whereas the plaintiff has presented those Florida court subpoenas to the District of Columbia Superior Court, which 

has issued the subpoenas under local law, Case No. 

2021–02459; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 316 ATS 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent committees and current and former employees of 

the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony or documents relating to their official 

responsibilities; and 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

2 represent the Committee on Armed Services and Thomas 

3 Kirk McConnell in this matter to seek to quash the sub4 poenas. 

5 SEC. 2. Elizabeth King, Majority Staff Director of 

6 the Committee on Armed Services, is authorized to provide 

7 a limited declaration sufficient to demonstrate the applica8 bility of the Speech or Debate Clause privilege in this mat9 ter, without waiving the Committee’s privilege. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 6, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 31, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 610 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1167, K2025-1167.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-02275 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Johnny Duriel HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-29

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 25, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
exv4w9






Exhibit 4.9




Consent of George Lanier




     I, George Lanier, hereby confirm that I have read the Offer and Circular of Fronteer
Development Group Inc. (the “Company”) furnished with the Company’s offer dated January 23, 2009 to
purchase all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Aurora Energy Resources Inc., which
Offer and Circular incorporates by reference the Company’s annual information form dated March 27,
2008 for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports in the AIF or other documents
incorporated by reference therein: (i) the technical report dated November 1, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report, Sandman Gold Project, Humboldt County, Nevada, USA” prepared together
with Michael M. Gustin and Jim Ashton, (ii) the technical report dated May 31, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report, Sandman Gold Project, Humboldt County, Nevada, USA” prepared together
with Michael M. Gustin and Jim Ashton, (iii) the technical report dated November 1, 2007 entitled
“Updated Technical Report Northumberland Project, Nye County, Nevada, USA” prepared together with
Michael M. Gustin and Steven Ristorcelli, and (iv) the technical report dated July 15, 2006
entitled “Technical Report Northumberland Project, Nye County, Nevada, USA” prepared together with
Michael M. Gustin and Steven Ristorcelli (collectively, the “Technical Reports”). I further
consent to the inclusion in the Offer and Circular and the registration statement on Form F-8 filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration Statement”) of the
Technical Reports (through the inclusion by way of incorporation by reference of the AIF in the
Offer and Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Reports in the Offer and
Circular and the Registration Statement or any documents incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Reports and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Reports contained in the Offer and Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Reports
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Reports.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	January 23, 2009 	  	(signed) George Lanier
 	 
	 	 	George Lanier
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-527
In Re: JOHNNIE ROWE, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-868) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnnie Rowe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Johnnie Rowe filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to act on his response and the motion to dismiss his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). Defendants filed the motion to dismiss on October 9, 1997, to which Rowe respondedon October 16, 1997. The motion and response are before a magistrate judge for his report and recommendation to the district court. We find that the delay in the district court has not beenunreasonable. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice to Rowe’s right to refile if the district court does not act within a reasonable time. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew  Buchholz,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Winchester  International  Resorts
          Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report")  fully complies
          with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Winchester International Resorts Inc.

Dated: September 30, 2009

                                      /s/ Andrew Buchholz
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Andrew Buchholz
                                      Chief Financial Officer and Director
                                      (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
                                      Accounting Officer)
                                      Winchester International Resorts Inc.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Winchester  International  Resorts
Inc. and will be retained by Winchester International Resorts Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 53 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the Government of Australia of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2022 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Australia of 

certain defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 Government of Australia is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles 

6 and services, described in Transmittal No. 22–27, 

7 submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) 

8 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

9 2776(b)(1)), and published in the Congressional 

10 Record on June 21, 2022: Up to fifteen (15) AGM– 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SJ 53 IS 

1 88E2 Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile 

2 (AARGM) Guidance Sections; up to fifteen (15) 

3 AARGM Control Sections; up to fifteen (15) High 

4 Speed Anti Radiation Missiles (HARM) Rocket Mo5 tors; up to fifteen (15) HARM Warheads; and up to 

6 fifteen (15) HARM Control Sections. Also included 

7 are AGM–88E2 AARGM All Up Round (AUR) tac8 tical missiles; AGM–88E2 AARGM Captive Air 

9 Training Missile (CATM); HARM G–Code AUR; 

10 HARM G–Code CATM; M–Code GPS receivers; con11 tainers; support and test equipment; EA–18G 

12 Growler test support; spare and repair parts; soft13 ware (Classified and Unclassified); U.S. Government 

14 and contractor engineering support; and other re15 lated elements of logistical and program support. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Eagle Resources Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ludvik Rolin, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 14, 2008

Ludvik Rolin

/s/ Ludvik Rolin

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)

Page 1
______________________________________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2

                         CERTIFICATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT
                                   PRIDE, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pride, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Powell,
Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ George A. Powell
--------------------------------------
George A. Powell
Vice-President, Secretary and Director

November 21, 2005
DYNASTY PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 3D18-389

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

Bruce Botsford (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant/cross-appellee.

Akerman LLP, and Nancy M. Wallace (Tallahassee) and William P. Heller (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Fogarty v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC*, 224 So.3d 313, 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (quoting *Wolkoff v. Am. Home Mortg. Serv., Inc.*, 153 So.3d 280, 281 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("In a typical foreclosure case, the plaintiff proves the amount of indebtedness through the testimony of a competent witness who can authenticate the mortgagee's business records and confirm that they accurately reflect the *482amount owed on the mortgage.") ); *Wachovia Mortg., F.S.B. v. Goodwill*, 199 So.3d 346, 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (holding plaintiff "presented legally sufficient evidence on the amount of damages" by introducing the payment history stating the principal balance and its witnesses' testimony confirming the payment history was accurate).
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.36


Amendment to Employment Agreement dated August 1, 1993 between Stephen Adams and
the Company.


                      [TYPED ON AFFINITY GROUP, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                  September 1, 1998





Stephen Adams
Affinity Group, Inc.
2575 Vista Del Mar Drive
Ventura, CA 93001

RE:  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED AS OF AUGUST 1, 1993 BETWEEN AFFINITY GROUP,
INC. (THE "COMPANY") AND STEPHEN ADAMS, AS AMENDED (THE "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT")

Dear Steve:

     The term of the Employment Agreement continues until September 1, 1998. 
The Company desires to continue your employment in accordance with the terms of
the Employment Agreement and you have acknowledged that you are willing to
continue such employment.  Therefore, the terms of the Employment Agreement
shall be extended for an additional one (1) year period beginning on the date
hereof and continuing until September 1, 1999.

     If the foregoing properly sets forth our understanding, I would appreciate
your so acknowledging by executing the counterpart of this letter in the space
provided below.
     
                                   AFFINITY GROUP, INC.
     
                                   By:  /s/ Joe B. McAdams
                                        ----------------------
                                   Its: President

Accepted and agreed to as of the 1st day of September, 1998.

/s/ Stephen Adams
-------------------
Stephen Adams

                                      67
Allen L. DORSEY, Sr., Appellant, v. Keefe CANTEEN, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-1933

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6845** 

KARSTEN OBED ALLEN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00726

- JCC

- TCB )

Submitted : September 10, 2014 Decided: September 23, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Karsten Obed Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding pre cedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Karsten Obed Allen seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability
. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Allen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Allen’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
Lisa RADFORD v. STATE

CR-16-1348

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SHEILA MENDEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CORDIS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00023-TEH 

REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF 

DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled case is hereby REFERRED

to the Honorable Edward M. Chen for consideration of whether the case is related to 

Dunson v. Cordis Corporation, Case No. 16-cv-03076-EMC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 01/18/17 ______________________________________ 

THELTON E. HENDERSON 

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00023-EMC Document 11 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 1
Heath WHITEAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-896

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.