alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART INTERDIGITAL’S MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No.17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART INTERDIGITAL’S 

MOTION TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1329

Before the Court is InterDigital’s administrative motion to seal. ECF No. 1329. 

InterDigital’s exhibits to its administrative motion to seal do not bear trial exhibit numbers. 

InterDigital’s Exhibit A is QX3502. By Friday, January 18, 2019, at 5:00 p.m., InterDigital shall 

file a redacted public version of the below documents consistent with the Court’s sealing rulings.

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court orders as follows:

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX3502 (Exhibit A) IDCC-FTCQCOM-0000139, 

selected portions

GRANTED as to the two royalty rate 

numbers, but DENIED as to the 

remainder of the highlighted portion.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1347 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART INTERDIGITAL’S MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX3502 (Exhibit A) IDCC-FTCQCOM-0000140, 

selected portions

GRANTED as to (1) the two royalty 

rate numbers, (2) the percentage of the 

total number of likely essential 

WCDMA and LTE patents and patent 

applications, through the end of that 

sentence, and (3) the second full 

paragraph on the page. DENIED as to

the remainder.

QX3502 (Exhibit A) IDCC-FTCQCOM-0000141, 

selected portions

GRANTED.

QX3502 (Exhibit A) IDCC-FTCQCOM-0000142, 

selected portions

GRANTED as to the top two lines of 

the page. DENIED as to the 

highlighted paragraph following the 

word “Response:”.

QX3502 (Exhibit A) IDCC-FTCQCOM-0000143, 

selected portions

GRANTED as to the first highlighted 

sentence, which is the second sentence 

of the first full paragraph on this page. 

DENIED as to the second highlighted 

sentence, which is the second full 

paragraph on this page.

QX3502 (Exhibit A) IDCC-FTCQCOM-0000144, 

selected portions

DENIED.

McElvaine Deposition 

(Exhibit B)

30:19-31:15 DENIED.

McElvaine Deposition 

(Exhibit C)

40:11-41:10 DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1347 Filed 01/17/19 Page 2 of 2
Shelby EVANS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joshua R. EVANS and Zung Clough, PLLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6451

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TANNER MOREN EAGLE LARCH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:18-cr-00146-MR-WCM -1; 1:23-

cv-00049-MR)

Submitted: August 15, 2024 Decided: September 17, 2024

Before THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tanner Moren Eagle Larch, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6451 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Tanner Moren Eagle Larch seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)).

Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Larch’s informal brief, we

conclude that Larch has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also 

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Larch has not demonstrated that jurists of reason could find debatable the district 

court’s denial of relief on his challenges to the constitutionality of his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) 

convictions and his term of supervised release. We further conclude that the district court 

did not abuse its discretion in denying Larch’s motion without issuing an order to show 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6451 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/17/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

cause to the Government, conducting an evidentiary hearing, and appointing counsel for 

Larch.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also 

deny Larch’s motion to vacate and remand for further proceedings and deny as moot his 

motion to remove this appeal from abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6451 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/17/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
Case 3:05-cr-00305-WHA Document 6 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:05-cr-00305-WHA Document 6 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO MODIFY 

AND EXTEND DEADLINE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART JOINT 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

MODIFY AND EXTEND DEADLINE

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5

Re: Dkt. No. 958

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Administrative Motion to Modify and Extend 

Deadline Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5. ECF No. 958. The Court GRANTS IN PART and 

DENIES IN PART the Motion as follows:

1. The parties shall not be permitted to file the entire proposed findings of fact under seal. 

The Court notes that on December 6, 2018, the parties filed public redacted versions of 

their findings of fact. ECF Nos. 966, 967.

2. On December 7, 2018, the parties shall provide notice to all affected non-parties 

attaching a copy of this order and providing non-parties with information setting forth 

each non-party’s Protected Information included in Parties’ findings of fact.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 968 Filed 12/07/18 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO MODIFY 

AND EXTEND DEADLINE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

3. By December 14, 2018, non-parties shall identify to the Parties which material that 

particular non-party seeks to seal and provide the Parties with declarations establishing 

that the information sought to be sealed is sealable.

4. On December 17, 2018, the parties shall file Joint Administrative Motions to Seal with 

all declarations supporting the requests to seal. If the parties do not request to seal all 

information currently redacted in the public versions of their findings of fact, the 

parties shall file updated redacted versions of their findings of fact on December 17, 

2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 7, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 968 Filed 12/07/18 Page 2 of 2
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Financial Condition 

March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 

(unaudited) 

March 31

2008

December 31

2007

Assets 

 Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 908,895,791 $ 479,926,476

 Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 1,693,179,954 1,906,452,561

 Accrued Interest Receivable 17,504,494 21,215,825

 Premiums Receivable 53,097,000 191,341,000

Total Assets $ 2,672,677,239 $ 2,598,935,862

Liabilities and Insurance Fund 

 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 234,472 $ 392,676

 Farm Credit Insurance Fund 

 Allocated Insurance Reserve Accounts 39,888,431 39,888,431

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 2,632,554,336 2,558,654,755

 Total Insurance Fund 2,672,442,767 2,598,543,186

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 2,672,677,239 $ 2,598,935,862
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Revenue and Expense 

For the Period Ended March 31, 2008 

(unaudited) 

Calendar Year To Date

March 31, 2008

Income 

 Premiums $ 53,097,000

 Interest Income on Investments 21,436,572

Total Income $ 74,533,572

Expenses 

 Administrative Operating Expenses $ 633,990

Total Expenses $ 633,990

Net Income $ 73,899,582
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., 

STEVEN FALLON, et al., 

Plaintiffs-Relators, 

v. 

BELL TRANSIT CORP., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-6994-PJH 

ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS 

TO DISMISS 

Re: Dkt. No. 117 

 The court is in receipt of plaintiff-relator Steven Fallon’s administrative motion for 

an extension of time to file his opposition to defendants’ pending motions to dismiss. See 

Dkt. 117. The administrative motion purports to seek an extension from May 13, 2021 to 

May 27, 2021. 

 As an initial matter, Fallon misstates the original due date for his opposition briefs, 

which was actually May 4, 2021. The court also notes that Fallon’s motion does not 

make a specific showing of good cause, instead relying on the boilerplate language that 

he ”requires additional time to prepare and file his opposition memoranda . . . [d]ue to 

both the volume and complexity of the issues raised.” Dkt. 117 at 2. 

 However, because defendants have not opposed the requested extension, 

Fallon’s administrative motion for an extension of time to file his opposition to defendants’ 

motions to dismiss is GRANTED. Fallon’s opposition briefs shall be filed no later than 

May 27, 2021, and defendants’ reply briefs shall be filed no later than June 3, 2021. 

 The current hearing scheduled for May 27, 2021 is VACATED. The court will 

Case 4:16-cv-06994-PJH Document 118 Filed 05/10/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

notify the parties if it intends to set a new hearing date. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 10, 2021 

 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton 

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:16-cv-06994-PJH Document 118 Filed 05/10/21 Page 2 of 2
Shannon Deron WILLIAMS, DOC #378222, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3355

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Richard W. McCullough   |   | August 12, 2010 |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------|
| Richard W. McCullough             |   |
| Chief Executive Officer           |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation |   |
| Managing General Partner          |   |
|                              |   |
|                              |   |
|  /s/ Gysle R. Shellum        |   | August 12, 2010 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                  |   |
| Chief Financial Officer           |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation |   |
| Managing General Partner          |   |
|                              |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-32306]



[[Page 163]]

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration (Benson Eyecare Corporation, Common Stock, $.01 Par 
Value); File No. 1-9435

December 27, 1994.
    Benson Eyecare Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and 
Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, in addition to being listed on the Amex, 
the Security is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''). 
The Security commenced trading on the NYSE at the opening of business 
on December 7, 1994 and concurrently therewith the Security was 
suspended from trading on the Amex.
    In making the decision to withdraw the Security from listing on the 
Amex, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and expenses 
attendant on maintaining the dual listing of its securities on the NYSE 
and on the Amex. The Company does not see any particular advantage in 
the dual trading of the Security and believes that dual listing would 
fragment the market for the Security.
    Any interested person may, on or before January 18, 1995, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street NW., Washington, DC 20549, facts bearing upon whether the 
application has been made in accordance with the rules of the Exchange 
and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission for the 
protection of investors. The Commission, based on the information 
submitted to it, will issue an order granting the application after the 
date mentioned above, unless the Commission determines to order a 
hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-32306 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Urs Kamber, as Chief Financial Officer of Centerpulse Ltd. (the "Company") hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F report for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | By: | /s/URS KAMBERName: Urs Kamber
Title: Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 24, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Centerpulse Ltd and will be retained by Centerpulse Ltd and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The  undersigned,  the Chief Executive  Officer of The Wilber  Corporation  (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

      (a)   the Form 10-Q of the Company for the six-month period ended June 30,
            2005,  filed on the date hereof  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
            Commission (the "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the
            Company as of and for the period covered by this report.


                           /s/ Alfred S. Whittet
                          --------------------------------------
                          Alfred S. Whittet
                          Vice Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer
                          Date:  August 4, 2005
                                 --------------

The forgoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Subsections (a)
and  (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code in
accordance with Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed  "filed" for  purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934, or otherwise  subject to the  liability of that section,  and shall not be
deemed to be  incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                       33
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 78 (Monday, April 24, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 20121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-10032]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Council on the Arts; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the National Council on the Arts will be held on May 5-6, 1995. The 
Council will meet from 9 a.m. to 6:15 p.m. on May 5, 1995 and from 8:30 
a.m. to 1 p.m. on May 6, 1995 in Room MO-9, at the Nancy Hanks Center, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.
    This meeting will be open to the public on May 5, 1995, from 9 a.m. 
to 6:15 p.m. and from 10:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. on May 6, 1995. Topics of 
discussions will include opening remarks; a Legislative Update; a 
preliminary discussion of the FY 97 Budget; a report from the Council 
Operations Committee; a discussion of Financial Need as a Review 
Criterion; A Program Reviews and/or Guidelines for the State and 
Regional, Local Arts Agencies, and International, Literature, Music and 
Visual Arts Programs.
    The remaining portion of this meeting on May 6, 1995 from 8:30 a.m. 
to 10:30 a.m. is for the purpose of reviewing nominations for the 
National Medal of Arts. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of April 18, 1995, this session will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsections (c)(6) and 9(B) of section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code.
    If, in the course of application discussion review, it becomes 
necessary for the Council to discuss non-public commercial or financial 
information of intrinsic value, the Council will go into closed session 
pursuant to subsection (c)(4) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552b. Any interested persons may attend, as observers, Council 
discussions and reviews which are open to the public.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Special Constituencies, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-
5532, TTY 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Karen Murphy, Office of Public Affairs, National Endowment for 
the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, at 202/682-5570.

    Dated: April 19, 1995.
Yvonne M. Sabine,
Director, Council and Panel Operations, National Endowment for the 
Arts.
[FR Doc. 95-10032 Filed 4-21-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1****Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002**In connection with Arlington Tankers Ltd.’s (the “Company”) quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thethree months ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Arthur L. Regan, President and Co-Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and Edward Terino, Co-Chief Executive Office and Chief Financial Officer, each herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to our knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date: May 10, 2006 /s/ Arthur L. Regan     Name: Arthur L. Regan  Title: President and Co-Chief Executive Officer   Date: May 10, 2006 /s/ Edward Terino     Name: Edward Terino  Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00099-CV

In the Interest of A.P. and B.P., 

children

§

§

§

§

From the 325th District Court

of Tarrant County (325-530796-13)

August 28, 2014

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM