alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID CHAD GLOW,

Plaintiff,

    v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYand HOWARD REDMOND,

Defendants.

                                                                      /

No. C-05-1933 MMC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’SAPPLICATION FOR ORDERSHORTENING TIME

(Docket No. 64)

Before the Court is plaintiff David Chad Glow’s application for an order shortening

time for the hearing of his motion for a continuance of the November 27, 2006 trial date. 

For good cause shown, the application is hereby GRANTED.  

No later than Thursday, November 9, 2006, at 4:00 p.m., defendants may file a

response to plaintiff’s motion for a continuance of the trial date.  No later than Monday,

November 13, 2006, at noon, plaintiff may file a reply.  If the Court determines oral

argument is necessary, the motion will be heard at the pretrial conference on Tuesday,

November 14, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 3, 2006                                                             MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01933-MMC   Document 67   Filed 11/03/06   Page 1 of 1
# L_2017233EN.01000601.xml

| 9.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 233/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 233/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2017/1535

of 4 September 2017

adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2017

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

Whereas:

| — | the Union's budget for the financial year 2017 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2016
   (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union's budget for the financial year 2017 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2016
   (2),

2

| — | on 27 June 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget for the financial year 2017, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 27 June 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget for the financial year 2017,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 was adopted on 4 September 2017.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 4 September 2017.

For the Council

The President

M. MAASIKAS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 51, 28.2.2017, p. 1.

2

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LAWRENCE OLIVER PETERKIN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1602

[ August 3, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312011CF001234

.

Lawrence Oliver Peterkin, Perry, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

E-filed 2/8/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD NORMAN STRILEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendant.

Case No.16-cv-07233-HRL 

JUDGMENT

On February 8, 2017, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss all claims in 

plaintiff’s complaint and denied leave to amend. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, 

the Court hereby ENTERS judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. The Clerk of 

Court shall close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 2/8/2017

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:16-cv-07233-HRL Document 17 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

NAGIB YOUSIF NAGIB,

Petitioner,

VS.

ALBERTO GONZALES, United States

Attorney General, ET AL.,

Respondents.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:06-CV-0294-G

)

) ECF

)

)

ORDER

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the

magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of

the court, except for the following:

1. The name “Alberton Gonzales” under the

subsection entitled “Parties:” should be

changed to “Alberto Gonzales.” 

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00294-G Document 14 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 132
- 2 -

SO ORDERED.

May 31, 2006.

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00294-G Document 14 Filed 05/31/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 133
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 24 (Thursday, February 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02295]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation 
may also include an assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. 
These meetings will primarily take place at NSF's headquarters, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an 
individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a 
notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of 
the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF website: 
https://new.nsf.gov/events/proposal-review-panels. This information may 
also be requested by telephoning 703/292-8687.

    Dated: February 3, 2025.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2025-02295 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Eagle Resources Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angel Cruz, the President, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 15, 2011





Angel Cruz





/s/ Angel Cruz


(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and


Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned operating manager of NGA HoldCo, LLC (the Company) hereby certifies to
his knowledge that the Companys annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                   
|-------------------- |  | ------------------
|Date: April 15, 2008 |  | /s/ Thomas R. Reeg
|                     |  | Thomas R. Reeg    
|                     |  | Operating Manager
# L_2017124EN.01003101.xml

| 17.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/31

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/832

of 16 May 2017

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 on the name Bürgstadter Berg (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, Germany's application to register the name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ was examined by the Commission and subsequently published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, Germany's application to register the name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ was examined by the Commission and subsequently published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of the Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of the Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Bürgstadter Berg’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2017.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 384, 18.10.2016, p. 4.

2

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Alan T. Waterman Award Committee (#1172).                

*Date and Time:*                     March 3, 2025, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. (eastern).                

*Place:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Virtual).                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Closed.                

*Contact Persons:*                     Gayle Pugh Lev, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-7589.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     Virtual meeting to provide advice and recommendations in the selection of the Alan T. Waterman Award recipient(s).                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate nominations as part of the selection process for awards to be granted for the Alan T. Waterman Award program.                

*Reason for Closing:*                     The nominations being reviewed include information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

Dated: February 6, 2025.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2025-02493 Filed 2-11-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Donavan Leigh PATTERSON, DOC #R92413, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-5070

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 21

- 00082

- CR

BREANNA RENA SIMMONS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 115th District Court Upshur County, Texas Trial Court No. 18716

Befo re Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O R D E R

Appellant Breanna Rena Simmons appeals from her conviction of driving while
intoxicated with a child passenger . On November 8 , 202 1
, Simmons ’s court

- appointed appellate

counsel filed an Anders 1 brief, and on November 22, 202 1
, Simmons filed a pro se moti on for
access to the appellate record for purposes of preparing a response to her counsel’s Anders brief.

Simmons ’s motion for access to the appellate record is granted. Under Kelly v. State
, 2 we are
required to enter an order specifying the procedure to be followed to ensure Simmons ’s access to

the record.

On December 1 , 202 1
, Simmons ’s appointed counsel informed this Court that s he mail ed
a complete paper copy of the appellate record to Simmons

. All owing ten days from the date of

this order for the record to be delivered to Simmons and giving Simmons thirty days to prepare

her pro se response, we h e re by set January 20 , 202 1 , as the deadli ne for Simmons to file her

pro se response to her counsel’s And ers brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

DATE: December 3 , 2021

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

2 Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 321

– 22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Scottie Eugene PAULEY v. STATE

CR-16-1231

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| 1) | such      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | the      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bridge      Capital Holdings. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 6, 2009 | /s/ Daniel P. Myers                        |   |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |                                       |
|                      | Daniel      P. Myers                       |
|                      | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

----
Brent MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2726

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 12, 2019

Brent Miller, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order that was the subject of a prior appeal in case number 1D17-3773, which resulted in an affirmance without opinion. *Miller v. State* , 1D17-3773, 2019 WL 764218 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 21, 2019) (table). Since Appellant is not entitled to a second review of the same order, this duplicative appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED .

Ray, Bilbrey, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 19, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 51 new standards have been initiated and 17 existing standards are being revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at:                     *https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​sasb/​sba/​12nov2024/​*,                     *https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​sasb/​sba/​11dec2024/​*. The following pre-standards activities associated with IEEE Industry Connections Activities were launched or renewed:                     *https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​bog/​cag/​approvals/​december2024/​*.                

                    On September 17, 2004, the IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 15, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on January 24, 2025 (90 FR 8145).                

Suzanne Morris

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-02113 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P