1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY DESEAN ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00327-YGR (PR)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS 

UNDER SEAL

Defendants, Dr. Jessica Hamilton, Paul Manaut, N.P., Maritess Rayrao, Stephanie 

Monahan, and Mary Bolds (collectively “Defendants”), having made administrative motions to 

file under seal the following documents (dkts. 33, 41), the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 

1. Portions of Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment or, 

in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support 

contains confidential medical information pertaining to Plaintiff. This Court finds there is good 

cause to file the redacted portions of this document under seal.

2. The Declaration of Dr. Jessica Hamilton in Support of Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, contains and outlines 

confidential medical information and records pertaining to Plaintiff. This Court finds there is 

good cause to file the declaration under seal in accordance with the below table. 

3. The Declaration of Paul Manaut, N.P., in Support of Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, contains and outlines 

confidential medical information pertaining to Plaintiff. This Court finds there is good cause to 

file this document under seal in accordance with the below table.

4. The Declaration of Jason W. Mauck., in Support of Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, contains and outlines 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

confidential medical information pertaining to Plaintiff. This Court finds there is good cause to 

file this document under seal in accordance with the below table.

5. The Separate Statement in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 

or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, contains and outlines confidential medical 

information pertaining to Plaintiff. This Court finds there is good cause to file this document 

under seal in accordance with the below table.

6. The documents to be filed as redacted or under seal are as follows: 

Documents Sought to be Sealed

(As indicated in the concurrently filed redacted documents)

Notice and Motion of Motion for 

Summary Judgment or, in the 

Alternative, Summary Adjudication; 

Memorandum of Points and Authorities. 

10:22-25; 11:25-12:4

Declaration of Dr. Jessica Hamilton in 

support of Motion for Summary 

Judgment or, in the Alternative, 

Summary Adjudication.

5:12-14; 6:7-10; 6:17; 9:4; 9: fn.6; 11:14: 

11:16; 11:18; 11:19-20; 11:22-23; 12:26-27; 

13:7-19; 16:24-17:11; Exhibit 1

1

. 

Declaration of Paul Manaut, in support of 

Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the 

Alternative, Summary Adjudication

7:5-9

Declaration of Jason W. Mauck in 

support of Motion for Summary 

Judgment or, in the Alternative, 

Summary Adjudication

2:3-8, Exhibit 2. 

Separate Statement in support of Motion 

for Summary Judgment or, in the 

Alternative, Summary Adjudication

3:5-9; 6:18-19

7. As noted, Defendants’ attorney did not efile Exhibit 1 to Dr. Hamilton’s 

 

1 The Court notes that Defendants’ attorney did not efile Exhibit 1 to Dr. Hamilton’s 

Declaration and stated that it was because “it is a voluminous document (PDF file size larger than 

efiling system allowances).” See Dkt. 38-1 at 2.
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Declaration, which is described as “attached medical records,” see Dkt. 33 at 2, and listed as an 

attachment to one of the present motions to seal as Docket No. 33-9. Instead, Defendants’ 

attorney efiled a notice of manual filing. Because the Court is granting the instant motion to seal, 

the Court directs Defendants’ attorney to efile Docket No. 33-9 (Exhibit 1 to Dr. Hamilton’s 

Declaration) under seal no later than fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. If necessary, 

Defendants’ attorney shall contact the Clerk’s Office for instructions on how to efile voluminous 

documents. 

8. This Order terminates Docket Nos. 33 and 41.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Judge

July 2, 2019