1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

 WHEREAS the Parties desire to minimize the burden and expense of duplicative fact 

discovery across cases (without limiting or otherwise modifying the appropriate topics of discovery 

in each case); and 

 WHEREAS the Parties agree that fact discovery in the above-captioned actions should be 

coordinated as provided herein; 

THE PARTIES THEREFORE STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 

1. For the purpose of this Order: 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No. 17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

IN RE: QUALCOMM ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

 

Case No. 17-md-02773-LHK-NMC 

IN RE: QUALCOMM LITIGATION 

 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 1 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

a. “Apple” refers to Apple Inc. 

b. “CMs” refers to Compal Electronics, Inc., FIH Mobile Ltd., Hon Hai Precision 

Industry Co., Ltd., Pegatron Corporation, and Wistron Corporation. 

c. “Contact Attorneys” refers to counsel designated by each Party and identified on 

Schedule A. 

d. “FTC” refers to the Federal Trade Commission. 

e. “FTC Litigation” refers to Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated, 

Case No. 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.). 

f. “MDL Litigation” refers to In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 17-md02773-LHK (N.D. Cal.), including all consolidated member cases (both current and 

any that may be transferred and consolidated in the future). 

g. “MDL Plaintiffs” refers collectively to the plaintiffs named in any consolidated or 

member case in the MDL Litigation, including in any consolidated complaint that is 

filed in the MDL Litigation. 

h. “ND Cal Litigation” refers collectively to the FTC Litigation and MDL Litigation. 

i. “Patents-In-Suit” means “Original Patents-in-Suit” as defined in the First Amended 

Complaint in the SD Cal Litigation (ECF No. 83). 

j. “Parties” or “Party” refers to the FTC, MDL Plaintiffs, Apple, the CMs, and 

Qualcomm. 

k. “Pending Cases” refers collectively to the FTC Litigation, the MDL Litigation, and 

the SD Cal Litigation. 

l. “Protective Orders” refers to the Protective Order and Supplemental Protective Orders 

in the FTC Litigation (ECF Nos. 81, 137, 205, 220, 230, 306, 324, 371, 374, 384, 388, 

392, 393, 410, 420, 430 and 447), the Protective Order and Supplemental Protective 

Orders in the MDL Litigation (ECF Nos. 46, 86, 148, 149, 182, 197, 211, 213, 216, 

218, 221, 244, 249 and 259), and the Protective Order in the SD Cal Litigation (ECF 

No. 163), in each case as may be supplemented and amended from time to time. 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 2 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

3

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

m. “Qualcomm” refers to Qualcomm Incorporated. 

n. “SD Cal Litigation” refers to the consolidated cases Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm 

Incorporated, Case No. 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.) and Qualcomm Incorporated v. 

Compal Electronics, Inc., FIH Mobile Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., 

Pegatron Corporation, and Wistron Corporation, Case No. 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. 

Cal.). 

2. Counsel for the Parties in each Pending Case shall be bound by this Order. 

COORDINATION OF WRITTEN DISCOVERY 

3. Any Party that serves or has served a written discovery request under Rule 31, 33, 34, or 36 

on another Party in any of the Pending Cases shall provide a copy of the request to the 

Contact Attorneys in each Pending Case, except insofar as such requests are served in the SD 

Cal Litgation and relate solely to claims concerning the Patents-In-Suit in the SD Cal 

Litigation. 

4. Any Party that responds or has responded to a written discovery request in any of the Pending 

Cases shall serve its response and produce any responsive materials to the Contact Attorneys 

in each Pending Case, except insofar as such requests are served in the SD Cal Litigation and 

relate solely to claims concerning the Patents-In-Suit in the SD Cal Litigation. 

5. A Party (the “Issuing Party”) that serves, after issuance of this Order, a subpoena or other 

request (including any request for international judicial assistance) for the production of 

documents or other materials on a person or entity not a Party (“Non-Party”) to any Pending 

Case shall promptly (a) provide a copy of the subpoena or other request to all Contact 

Attorneys; (b) provide a copy of this Order and the Protective Orders in effect in each of the 

Pending Cases to the Non-Party; (c) notify the Non-Party that, pursuant to this Order, 

materials produced in response to such subpoena or other request will be produced in each 

Pending Case, and (d) request that the Non-Party simultaneously produce materials to the 

Contact Attorneys in each Pending Case. If, notwithstanding such request, the Non-Party 

does not produce the materials to the Contact Attorneys in each Pending Case, the issuing 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 3 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Party shall, as permitted by law, provide a copy of all materials produced pursuant to the 

subpoena or other request to the Contact Attorneys in each of the Pending Cases within five 

(5) calendar days after receipt of the materials from the Non-Party. If a Party has served a 

Non-Party subpoena or other document request prior to the issuance of this Order, the Issuing 

Party will provide a copy of the subpoena or other request to all Contact Attorneys, advise the 

Non-Party that the document production is to be shared across the Pending Cases and provide 

an opportunity of ten (10) days to object, and shall provide a copy of all materials produced 

pursuant to the subpoena or other request to the Contact Attorneys in each of the Pending 

Cases within five (5) calendar days after the later of (1) expiration of such ten (10) day 

period, or (2) the Party’s receipt of materials from the Non-Party. If a Party modifies or 

extends the time to respond to a Rule 45 document subpoena in writing, it shall promptly 

inform Contact Attorneys in each Pending Case of that written extension or modification. 

This paragraph shall not apply to a subpoena or other request served in the SD Cal Litigation 

that relates solely to claims concerning the Patents-In-Suit in the SD Cal Litigation. 

6. All written responses to discovery requests and subpoenas and materials provided in response 

to discovery requests and subpoenas in any Pending Case shall be treated as having been 

obtained through discovery in each Pending Case, except insofar as such responses and 

materials relate solely to claims concerning the Patents-In-Suit in the SD Cal Litigation. Any 

such materials shall be clearly designated “SD Cal Litigation Only.” 

COORDINATION OF DEPOSITIONS 

7. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(A), leave is granted to all Parties to conduct in excess of 

ten (10) depositions per side, provided that nothing in this Order shall prevent the FTC and 

Qualcomm from entry into an agreement limiting the number of depositions to be noticed or 

deemed taken in the FTC Litigation, or from seeking a court order imposing such a 

limitation. For avoidance of doubt, this order supplants the deposition hours limitations set 

forth in the September 11, 2017 Order Granting Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation 

Regarding Scheduling and Discovery Matters in the SD Cal Litigation (“September 11, 2017 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 4 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

5

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Order”), except insofar as a deposition relates solely to claims concerning the Patents-In-Suit 

in the SD Cal Litigation, in which case the party noticing the deposition shall so indicate in 

such notice and the September 11, 2017 Order will apply. 

8. Depositions subpoenaed, noticed, and/or taken in any of the Pending Cases shall be treated as 

if they were noticed and taken in each Pending Case (to the extent, absent agreement of the 

parties or leave of court, the deposition is taken during the court-ordered discovery period for 

the particular Pending Case), except insofar as a deposition relates solely to claims 

concerning the Patents-in-Suit in the SD Cal Litigation, in which case the party noticing the 

deposition shall indicate in such notice and/or during such deposition; provided that, absent a 

Court order or agreement of the FTC and Qualcomm to the contrary, only depositions noticed 

in the FTC Litigation shall be treated as having been noticed and taken in the FTC Litigation. 

9. A Party issuing a deposition notice or subpoena or seeking a request for international judicial 

assistance in obtaining testimony of any non-Party witness (the “Subpoenaing Party”) shall 

provide at least five (5) days advance notice to Contact Attorneys in each Pending Case. 

Other Parties shall be entitled to join the Subpoenaing Party’s notice, subpoena, or request by 

notice to Contact Attorneys in each Pending Case within such five (5) day period. The 

Parties also will preserve the right to add topics to any 30(b)(6) or similar subpoena or notice. 

The Parties shall make reasonable good-faith efforts to coordinate the scheduling of the 

deposition with each other and with any Non-Party witness, provided, however, that no Party 

may unreasonably delay a deposition. 

10. For Party depositions, prior to issuing a notice for a date certain, the noticing Party shall 

notify the Contact Attorneys for all Parties of its intent to depose a particular witness, and 

request available dates for the witness from counsel for the Party whose witness’s deposition 

is sought. Within seven (7) days of receiving the request, the Party to whom such a request is 

made shall provide at least one (1) proposed deposition date (i.e., one (1) set of two (2) days 

for a fourteen (14) hour deposition) and use good faith efforts to provide two (2) proposed 

deposition dates. For depositions of witnesses requested after entry of this Order, if any Party 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 5 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

6

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

proposes only one (1) deposition date for a particular witness, it shall not propose any date 

that would require more than one (1) of its other witnesses to be deposed on the same date, 

absent agreement of all Parties. If other Parties intend to depose the same witness, they must 

provide notice to the Contact Attorneys for all Parties of such intent within seven (7) days of 

being notified that such witness’s deposition is being sought.1 If the Party whose witness is 

being sought for deposition is informed that multiple Parties intend to depose that witness, 

that Party shall provide deposition dates with sufficient time for questioning by multiple 

Parties. The noticing Party or Parties shall use their best efforts to schedule the deposition on 

a proposed deposition date mutually agreeable to all Parties. The Party whose witness’s 

deposition is sought shall retain its right to formally object (by motion for protective order or 

otherwise) to the taking of a particular deposition or to the timing or scope of such 

deposition. 

11. Counsel in any of the Pending Cases shall be entitled to attend depositions noticed in each 

Pending Case, so long as they agree to be bound by the Protective Order entered in one of the 

Pending Cases, except insofar as such depositions relate solely to claims concerning the 

Patents-In-Suit in the SD Cal Litigation, in which case only counsel for Parties to the SD Cal 

Litigation may attend. A Party’s in-house counsel bound by a protective order may attend 

depositions of its current or former employees, and if the examining party intends to ask 

questions about information produced in discovery that has been designated for outside 

counsel only, the examining party shall indicate that it intends to ask about information so 

designated, allowing the in-house counsel to excuse himself or herself for that portion of the 

examination. Non-noticing counsel may ask questions and raise objections at depositions to 

the extent allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Parties shall meet and 

confer in advance of each deposition to allocate deposition time, if necessary, and attempt to 

coordinate a single Party to make objections. Any Party may avail itself of any objection to 

 1

 Note, for any deposition notice issued prior to the filing of this Proposed Order, the seven day 

notice period starts from the filing of this Proposed Order. 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 6 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

7

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

the form of a question made by any other Party properly in attendance at a deposition without 

the need to be in attendance or express its joinder in the objection. 

12. The time limits on depositions established by Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(1) shall apply to all 

depositions, except that in the event that a deposition of a Non-Party is noticed in both the 

ND Cal Litigation and the SD Cal Litigation, the Parties agree that, absent good cause, they 

will not oppose an extension of the time limit for that deposition to up to fourteen (14) hours 

of on-the-record questioning time. In any deposition of Qualcomm or a current or former 

Qualcomm employee in his or her individual capacity noticed in both the ND Cal Litigation 

and the SD Cal Litigation, the deposition time limit shall be extended to up to fourteen (14) 

hours of on-the-record questioning time in total. In any deposition of Apple or a current or 

former Apple employee in his or her individual capacity, or in any deposition of a CM or a 

current or a former CM employee in his or her individual capacity noticed in both the ND Cal 

Litigation and the SD Cal Litigation, the deposition time limit shall be extended to up to 

fourteen (14) hours of on-the-record time in total. 

13. A Party that was provided prior notice of a deposition (other than a deposition pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6)) in any Pending Case and did not make a contemporaneous request to 

depose the witness may not, absent leave of Court, notice a second deposition of the same 

witness in a Pending Case. 

14. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent documents relating to a Party’s witness are 

produced by that Party either within the two week period prior to the commencement of a 

witness’s deposition or after the commencement or completion of such witness’s deposition, 

and such documents are material and non-cumulative of documents previously produced, the 

parties shall as soon as practicable meet and confer to discuss whether to reschedule the 

deposition, or re-open the deposition (to the extent it has already occurred). If the parties are 

unable to agree, they shall jointly present the issue to the Court for resolution. With respect 

to depositions of Apple or CM witnesses, this Paragraph supersedes the fourth sentence of 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 7 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

8

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Paragraph 8(b) of the Stipulated Order Re: Discovery of Electronically Stored Information 

and Related Discovery Matters in the FTC Litigation (ECF No. 142). 

PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS 

15. Any Party that serves or has served a pleading or motion on another Party in any Pending 

case shall serve an unredacted copy of the pleading or motion on the Contact Attorneys in 

each Pending Case, subject if necessary to the Protective Orders in those cases. This 

paragraph shall not apply to pleadings or motions served in the SD Cal Litigation that relate 

solely to claims concerning the Patents-In-Suit in the SD Cal Litigation. 

PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 

16. The Protective Order in effect in each Pending Case is hereby modified to permit the 

disclosure and production of Protected Material (as defined therein) to the Contact Attorneys 

in each Pending Case, and the further use and disclosure of such material by each Party 

hereto in accordance with the Protective Order(s), including any Supplemental Protective 

Order(s), in each Pending Case to which it is a Party. 

17. The Protective Order or Supplemental Protective Order(s) in effect in each Pending Case 

shall govern the handling by the Parties to such Pending Case of protected material produced 

hereunder, and, unless modified by the designating party, confidentiality designations applied 

in one Pending Case shall apply in all Pending Cases. To the extent there are conflicts among 

the Protective Orders or Supplemental Protective Order(s) regarding the individual 

employees of a Party who may access Protected Material, the Protective Order or 

Supplemental Protective Order that applied to the original production of a particular 

document designated as Protected Material shall control. 

18. Effective upon its entry in all of the Pending Cases, this Order shall supersede in its entirety 

the Joint Stipulation and Discovery Coordination Order currently in effect in the FTC 

Litigation (ECF No. 207) and the MDL Litigation (ECF No. 131). 

 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 8 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

9

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 

Dated: January 22, 2018 

By: /s/ Jennifer Milici 

 Jennifer Milici, D.C. Bar No. 987096 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

(202) 326-2912; (202) 326-3496 (fax) 

jmilici@ftc.gov

Attorney for Plaintiff FEDERAL TRADE 

COMMISSION

Dated: January 22, 2018 

By: /s/ Kalpana Srinivasan

 

 Kalpana Srinivasan

Marc M. Seltzer 

Steven G. Sklaver 

Amanda Bonn 

Oleg Elkhunovich 

Krysta Kauble Pachman 

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 

1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 789-3100 

Facsimile: (310) 789-3006 

Email: ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: mmseltzer@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: abonn@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: oelkhunovich@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: kpachman@susmangodfrey.com 

Joseph Grinstein 

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 

1000 Louisiana Street # 5100 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (713) 651-9366 

Facsimile: (713) 654-6666 

Email: jgrinstein@susmangodfrey.com 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 9 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

10

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Joseph W. Cotchett 

Adam J. Zapala 

Brian Danitz 

Mark F. Ram 

Michael A. Montano 

Toriana S. Holmes 

COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY 

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 

Burlingame, CA 94010 

Telephone: (650) 697-6000 

Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 

Email: jcotchett@cpmlegal.com 

Email: azapala@cpmlegal.com 

Email: bdanitz@cpmlegal.com 

Email: mram@cpmlegal.com 

Email: mmontano@cpmlegal.com 

Email: tholmes@cpmlegal.com 

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel 

Steve W. Berman 

Jeff Friedman 

Rio Pierce 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO 

LLP 

1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 268-9320 

Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 

Email: steve@hbsslaw.com 

Email: jefff@hbsslaw.com 

Email: riop@hbsslaw.com 

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee 

Dated: January 22, 2018 

By: /s/ Seth M. Sproul 

 Juanita R. Brooks (SBN 75934) 

Seth M. Sproul (SBN 217711) 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

12390 El Caamino Real 

San Diego, CA 92130 

Telephone: 858-678-5070 

Facsimile: 858-678-5099 

Email: brooks@fr.com 

Email: sproul@fr.com 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 10 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

11

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Ruffin B. Cordell (admitted pro hac vice) 

Lauren A. Degnam (admitted pro hac vice) 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

The McPherson Building 

901 15th Street, N.W., 7th Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Telephone: 202-783-5070 

Facsimile: 202-783-2331 

Email: cordell@fr.com 

Email: degnan@fr.com 

William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice) 

Karen L. Dunn (admitted pro hac vice) 

Amy J. Mauser (admitted pro hac vice) 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 

1401 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Telephone: 202-237-2727 

Facsimile: 202-237-6131 

Email: wisaascson@bsfllp.com 

Email: kdunn@bsfllp.com 

Email: amauser@bsfllp.com

Attorneys for APPLE INC.

Dated: January 22, 2018 

By: /s/ Jason C. Lo 

 

Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. (SBN 132099) 

Daniel G. Swanson (SBN 116556) 

Jason C. Lo (SBN 219030) 

Jennifer J. Rho (SBN 254312) 

Melissa Phan (SBN 266880) 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 229-7000 

Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 

Email: tboutrous@gibsondunn.com 

Email: dswanson@gibsondunn.com 

Email: jlo@gibsondunn.com 

Email: jrho@gibsondunn.com 

Email: mphan@gibsondunn.com 

Cynthia E. Richman (admitted pro hac vice) 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Telephone: (202) 955-8500 

Facsimile: (202) 467-0539 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 11 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

12

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Email: crichman@gibsondunn.com 

Attorneys for COMPAL ELECTRONICS, 

INC., FIH MOBILE LTD., HON HAI 

PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD., 

PEGATRON CORPORATION, and 

WISTRON CORPORATION 

Hugh F. Bangasser (admitted pro hac vice) 

Christopher M. Wyatt (admitted pro hac 

vice) 

J. Timothy Hobbs (admitted pro hac vice) 

K&L GATES LLP 

925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900 

Seattle, WA 98104 

Telephone: 206-623-7580 

Facsimile: 206-370-6371 

Email: hugh.bangasser@klgates.com 

Email: tim.hobbs@klgates.com 

Attorneys for WISTRON CORPORATION 

Dated: January 22, 2018 

By: /s/ Evan R. Chesler

 

Evan R. Chesler 

Richard J. Stark 

Antony L. Ryan 

Gary A. Bornstein 

J. Wesley Earnhardt 

Yonatan Even 

Vanessa A. Lavely 

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

Worldwide Plaza 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, NY 10019 

Tel: (212) 474-1000 

Fax: (212) 474-3700 

echesler@cravath.com 

rstark@cravath.com 

aryan@cravath.com 

gbornstein@cravath.com 

wearnhardt@cravath.com 

yeven@cravath.com 

vlavely@cravath.com 

Karen P. Hewitt 

Randall E. Kay 

Kelly V. O’Donnell 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 12 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

13

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

JONES DAY 

4655 Executive Drive, Suite 1500 

San Diego, California 92121 

Tel: (858) 314-1200 

Fax: (844) 345-3178 

kphewitt@jonesday.com 

rekay@jonesday.com 

kodonnell@jonesday.com 

Robert A. Van Nest 

Asim M. Bhansali 

Eugene M. Paige 

Matan Shacham 

Justina Sessions 

David W. Rizk 

Alexander Dryer 

KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP 

633 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: (415) 391-5400 

Fax: (415) 397-7188 

rvannest@keker.com 

abhansali@keker.com 

epaige@keker.com 

mshacham@keker.com 

jsessions@keker.com 

drizk@keker.com 

adryer@keker.com 

Richard S. Taffet 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

101 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10178-0060 

Tel: (212) 309-6000 

Fax: (212) 309-6001 

richard.taffet@morganlewis.com 

Willard K. Tom 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

1111 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20004-2541 

Tel: (202) 739-3000 

Fax: (202) 739 3001 

willard.tom@morganlewis.com 

Donn P. Pickett 

Geoffrey T. Holtz 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: (415) 442-1000 

Fax: (415) 442-1001 

donn.pickett@morganlewis.com 

geoffrey.holtz@morganlewis.com 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 13 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

14

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Richard S. Zembek

Daniel S. Leventhal 

Talbot Hansum 

Eric B. Hall 

NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 

1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 

Houston, Texas 77010 

Tel: (713) 651-5151 

richard.zembek@nortonrosefulbright.com 

daniel.leventhal@nortonrosefulbright.com 

talbot.hansum@nortonrosefulbright.com 

eric.hall@nortonrosefulbright.com 

David A. Nelson 

Stephen Swedlow 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

500 West Madison St., Suite 2450 

Chicago, Illinois 60661 

Tel: (312) 705-7400 

Fax: (312) 705-7401 

davenelson@quinnemanuel.com 

stephenswedlow@quinnemanuel.com 

Alexander Rudis 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor 

New York, NY 10010 

Tel: (212) 849-7000 

Fax: (212) 849-7100 

alexanderrudis@quinnemanuel.com 

Sean S. Pak 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

50 California St., 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Tel: (415) 875-6600 

Fax: (415) 875-6700 

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com 

Attorneys for QUALCOMM 

INCORPORATED 

 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 14 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

15

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

FILER’S ATTESTATION 

I, James W. Carlson, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Joint Stipulation and Discovery Coordination Order. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), 

I hereby attest that the signatories on this document have concurred in this filing. 

By: /s/ James W. Carlson

 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 15 of 21
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

16

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________ Honorable Lucy H. Koh 

 United States District Judge 

DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________ Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 16 of 21
-1- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

SCHEDULE A 

Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated, Case No. 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.) 

Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission 

Jennifer Milici, jmilici@ftc.gov 

J. Alexander Ansaldo, jansaldo@ftc.gov 

Joseph R. Baker, jbaker1@ftc.gov 

Wesley G. Carson, wcarson@ftc.gov 

Elizabeth A. Gillen, egillen@ftc.gov 

Daniel Matheson, dmatheson@ftc.gov 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated 

 

Gary A. Bornstein, gbornstein@cravath.com 

 J. Wesley Earnhardt, wearnhardt@cravath.com 

 Yonatan Even, yeven@cravath.com 

 Vanessa A. Lavely, vlavely@cravath.com 

 Stefan H. Atkinson, satkinson@cravath.com 

 James W. Carlson, jcarlson@cravath.com 

 CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

 Worldwide Plaza 

 825 Eighth Avenue 

 New York, NY 10019 

 Robert A. Van Nest, rvannest@keker.com 

 Asim M. Bhansali, abhansali@keker.com 

 Eugene M. Paige, epaige@keker.com 

 Matan Shacham, mshacham@keker.com 

 Justina Sessions, jsessions@keker.com 

 David W. Rizk, drizk@keker.com 

 Alexander Dryer, adryer@keker.com 

 KEKER, VAN NEST, & PETERS LLP 

 633 Battery Street 

 San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 

 Richard S. Taffet, richard.taffet@morganlewis.com 

 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 101 Park Avenue 

 New York, NY 10178-0060 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 17 of 21
-2- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

 Willard K. Tom, willard.tom@morganlewis.com 

 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 1111 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

 Washington, DC 20004-2541 

 Donn P. Pickett, donn.pickett@morganlewis.com 

 Geoffrey T. Holtz, geoffrey.holtz@morganlewis.com 

 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 One Market, Spear Street Tower 

 San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

 Richard S. Zembek, richard.zembek@nortonrosefulbright.com 

 Daniel S. Leventhal, daniel.leventhal@nortonrosefulbright.com 

 Talbot Hansum, talbot.hansum@nortonrosefulbright.com 

 Eric B. Hall, eric.hall@nortonrosefulbright.com 

 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT 

 1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 

 Houston, Texas 77010 

In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. Cal.) 

Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Counsel 

Kalpana Srinivasan 

Marc M. Seltzer 

Steven G. Sklaver 

Amanda Bonn 

Oleg Elkhunovich 

Krysta Kauble Pachman 

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 

1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Telephone: (310) 789-3100 

Facsimile: (310) 789-3150 

Email: ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: ssklaver@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: abonn@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: oelkhunovich@susmangodfrey.com 

Email: kpachman@susmangodfrey.com 

Joseph Grinstein 

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (713) 651-9366 

Facsimile: (713) 654-6666 

Email: jgrinstein@susmangodfrey.com 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 18 of 21
-3- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Joseph W. Cotchett 

Adam J. Zapala 

Brian Danitz 

Mark F. Ram 

Michael A. Montano 

Toriana S. Holmes 

COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY 

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 

Burlingame, CA 94010 

Telephone: (650) 697-6000 

Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 

Email: jcotchett@cpmlegal.com 

Email: azapala@cpmlegal.com 

Email: bdanitz@cpmlegal.com 

Email: mram@cpmlegal.com 

Email: mmontano@cpmlegal.com 

Email: tholmes@cpmlegal.com 

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee 

Steve W. Berman 

Jeff Friedman 

Rio Pierce 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 268-9320 

Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 

Email: steve@hbsslaw.com 

Email: jefff@hbsslaw.com 

Email: riop@hbsslaw.com 

Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated 

 Gary A. Bornstein, gbornstein@cravath.com 

 J. Wesley Earnhardt, wearnhardt@cravath.com 

 Yonatan Even, yeven@cravath.com 

 Vanessa A. Lavely, vlavely@cravath.com 

 Stefan H. Atkinson, satkinson@cravath.com 

 James W. Carlson, jcarlson@cravath.com 

 CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

 Worldwide Plaza 

 825 Eighth Avenue 

 New York, NY 10019 

 Robert A. Van Nest, rvannest@keker.com 

 Asim M. Bhansali, abhansali@keker.com 

 Eugene M. Paige, epaige@keker.com 

 Justina Sessions, jsessions@keker.com 

 David W. Rizk, drizk@keker.com 

 Alexander Dryer, adryer@keker.com 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 19 of 21
-4- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

 KEKER, VAN NEST, & PETERS LLP 

 633 Battery Street 

 San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 

 Richard S. Taffet, richard.taffet@morganlewis.com 

 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 101 Park Avenue 

 New York, NY 10178-0060 

 Willard K. Tom, willard.tom@morganlewis.com 

 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 1111 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

 Washington, DC 20004-2541 

Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, Case No. 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.) and Qualcomm 

Incorporated v. Compal Electronics, Inc., FIH Mobile Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., 

Pegatron Corporation, and Wistron Corporation, Case No. 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Apple Inc. 

Amy J. Mauser 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 

1401 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Phone: 202-237-2727 

Email: amauser@bsfllp.com 

Benjamin C. Elacqua 

FISH & RICHARDSON LLP 

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2800 

Houston, TX 77010 

Phone: 713-654-5300 

Email: Elacqua@fr.com 

Apple_Qualcomm_Service@bsfllp.com 

Apple/QualcommFRService@fr.com 

Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Compal Electronics, Inc., FIH Mobile Ltd., Hon Hai 

Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Pegatron Corporation, and Wistron Corporation 

Jason Lo, jlo@gibsondunn.com 

Jennifer Rho, jrho@gibsondunn.com 

Ryan Iwahashi, riwahashi@gibsondunn.com 

CHPW-1010@gibsondunn.com 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 20 of 21
-5- 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] JOINT DISCOVERY COORDINATION ORDER 

Case Nos.: 17-cv-00220-LHK (N.D. Cal.), 17-md-02773-LHK (N.D. 

Cal.), 17-cv-00108-GPC (S.D. Cal.), 17-cv-01010-GPC (S.D. Cal.)

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Qualcomm Incorporated 

 Gary A. Bornstein, gbornstein@cravath.com 

 J. Wesley Earnhardt, wearnhardt@cravath.com 

 Yonatan Even, yeven@cravath.com 

 Vanessa A. Lavely, vlavely@cravath.com 

 Stefan H. Atkinson, satkinson@cravath.com 

 James W. Carlson, jcarlson@cravath.com 

 CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

 Worldwide Plaza 

 825 Eighth Avenue 

 New York, NY 10019 

 David A. Nelson, davenelson@quinnemanuel.com 

 Stephen Swedlow, stephenswedlow@quinnemanuel.com 

 Marc L. Kaplan, marckaplan@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 500 West Madison St., Suite 2450 

Chicago, Illinois 60661 

 Michael L. Fazio, michaelfazio@quinnemanuel.com 

 Joseph C. Sarles, josephsarles@quinnemanuel.com 

 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor 

 Los Angeles, CA 90017 

 Alexander Rudis, alexanderrudis@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor 

New York, NY 10010 

Sean S. Pak, seanpak@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

50 California St., 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Karen P. Hewitt, kphewitt@jonesday.com 

Randall E. Kay, rekay@jonesday.com 

Kelly V. O’Donnell, kodonnell@jonesday.com 

JONES DAY 

4655 Executive Drive, Suite 1500 

San Diego, California 92121 

 Richard S. Zembek, richard.zembek@nortonrosefulbright.com 

 Daniel S. Leventhal, daniel.leventhal@nortonrosefulbright.com 

 Talbot Hansum, talbot.hansum@nortonrosefulbright.com 

 Eric B. Hall, eric.hall@nortonrosefulbright.com 

 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT 

 1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 

 Houston, Texas 77010 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 511 Filed 01/22/18 Page 21 of 21