alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00321-EMC

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF QUALITY STAINLESS TANKS - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JAMES R. ARNOLD (SBN 56262)

JOHN A. BEARD (SBN 301405)

THE ARNOLD LAW PRACTICE (East Bay Office)

3685 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suite 331

Lafayette, CA 94549

Telephone: (925) 284-8887

Facsimile: (925) 284-1387

Email: jarnold@arnoldlp.com

jbeard@arnoldlp.com

Attorneys for Defendant

RICHARD DAPELO, doing business as

QUALITY STAINLESS TANKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING

PROTECTION ALLIANCE, Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD DAPELO, individually, and

doing business as QUALITY STAINLESS

TANKS, and QUALITY STAINLESS

TANKS, an entity of unknown type, Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00321-EMC

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF

PUTATIVE DEFENDANT QUALITY

STAINLESS TANKS, an entity of unknown

type

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), by and between counsel of record for plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING

PROTECTION ALLIANCE and defendant RICHARD DAPELO, individually and doing

business as QUALITY STAINLESS TANKS that putative defendant “QUALITY STAINLESS

TANKS, an entity of unknown type,” is a nonexistent entity and so is hereby dismissed with

prejudice.

//

//
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00321-EMC

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF QUALITY STAINLESS TANKS - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: August 9, 2017 THE ARNOLD LAW PRACTICE

By: /s/ James R. Arnold

James R. Arnold

Counsel for Defendant

RICHARD DAPELO,

DOING BUSINESS AS QUALITY

STAINLESS TANKS

DATED: August 9, 2017

AQUA TERRA AERIS LAW GROUP LLP

By: /s/ Anthony M. Barnes

Anthony M. Barnes

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING

PROTECTION ALLIANCE

ATTESTATION FOR E-FILING

I hereby attest pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) that I have obtained concurrence in the

filing of this document from the signatories prior to filing.

DATED: August 9, 2017 By: /s/ John A. Beard

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy M
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: August 11, 2005

By:/s/ Robert E. Swanson
------------------------
Robert E. Swanson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
D.E. v. RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160928

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Asian Trends Media Holdings, Inc.





/s/ Huang Jian Nan
Date: August 14, 2012Huang Jian NanChief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2, 2018

a0924 

# Order

Clerk October 2, 2018

156916

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156916

COA: 340012

Wayne CC: 99

- 010005

- FC

STEVEN BROWN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cono Italiano, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mitchell Brown, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: May
13, 2010




By:
                /s/ Mitchell BrownName:   
      Mitchell BrownTitle:     
      Principal Executive
Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00266

- CV

S.J. LOUIS CONSTRUCT ION OF TEXAS, LTD. APPELLANT

V.

PRINCIPLE ENVIRONMEN TAL, LLC D/B/A PRINCIPLE ENERGY SERVICES APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 67TH DISTRI CT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 067

- 278325

- 15

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion for Dismissal upon

Agreement, Vacate Trial Court's Judgment, Discharge the Surety on the

Supersedeas Bond, and Release the Supersedeas Bond.” We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2 ) (A) , 43.2(f). Further, the

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

surety for appellant S.J. Louis Construction of Texas, Ltd., Liberty Mutual

Insurance Company, is discharged from its liability on the supersedeas bond filed

in the trial c ourt on August 4, 2016. See Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld,

L.L.P. v. Nat’l Dev. & Research Corp. , 313 S.W.3d 467, 468 (Tex. App.

— Dallas

2010, no pet.) (op. on remand). The discharge of the surety shall also be

reflected in the mandate, which shall be issued this same day under the parties’

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c). Each party shall bear its own costs of

court , for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDE RTH, J

DELIVERED: October 13, 2016
NOTICE OF FIRM NAME CHANGE 

16-MD-02752-LHK 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 

Ann Marie Mortimer (SBN 169077) 

amortimer@huntonAK.com 

Jason J. Kim (SBN 221476) 

kimj@huntonAK.com 

Kirk A. Hornbeck (SBN 241708) 

khornbeck@huntonAK.com 

HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 

Telephone: (213) 532-2000 

Facsimile: (213) 532-2020 

Samuel A. Danon (admitted pro hac vice) 

sdanon@huntonAK.com 

John J. Delionado (admitted pro hac vice) 

jdelionado@huntonAK.com 

HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP 

1111 Brickell Avenue, Suite 2500 

Miami, Florida 33143 

Telephone: (305) 810-2500 

Facsimile: (305) 810-2460 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Yahoo! Inc. and 

Aabaco Small Business, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN RE: YAHOO! CUSTOMER DATA 

SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION 

CASE NO.: 16-MD-02752-LHK 

NOTICE OF FIRM NAME CHANGE 

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 221 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 2
1 

NOTICE OF FIRM NAME CHANGE 

16-MD-02752-LHK 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 

Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, effective immediately, Hunton & Williams 

LLP has changed its name to Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. The firm’s addresses, 

telephone numbers, and facsimile numbers will remain the same. The email addresses 

for counsel representing Defendants have changed to reflect the domain name 

@huntonAK.com. The new email addresses are as follows: 

ATTORNEYS NEW EMAIL ADDRESSES 

Ann Marie Mortimer amortimer@huntonAK.com 

Jason J. Kim kimj@huntonAK.com 

Kirk A. Hornbeck khornbeck@huntonAK.com 

Samuel A. Danon sdanon@hunton.AK 

John J. Delionado jdelionado@huntonAK.com 

Dated: April 9, 2018 HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP 

By: /s/ Ann Marie Mortimer 

Ann Marie Mortimer 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Yahoo! Inc. and Aabaco Small 

Business, LLC 

Case 5:16-md-02752-LHK Document 221 Filed 04/09/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Southwest  Olive  Growers,
Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  October 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
Feneziani,  President of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert Feneziani
Robert Feneziani
President and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)


December 20, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2017035EN.01001501.xml

| 10.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 35/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 35/15

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/231

of 9 February 2017

on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the fourth partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage (2), and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure.

| (2) | In the light of the tenders received for the fourth partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the tenders received for the fourth partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the fourth partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 7 February 2017, a minimum selling price has not been fixed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 February 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p. 71.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 of 25 November 2016 opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure (OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 45).

3

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 15, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (the “Act”), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Data Vid, Limited, London, UNITED KINGDOM; DeltaSoft, Inc., Hillsborough, NJ; Limoges Consulting, Basel, SWITZERLAND; Altair Engineering, Inc., Troy, MI; and bPrescient, Inc., Newton, MA have joined as parties to this venture.                

Also, Eccenca, GmbH, Leipzig, GERMANY; Elucidata Corporation, Cambridge, MA; and TopQuadrant Inc., Raleigh, NC have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 21, 2024. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2024 (89 FR 82634).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-01695 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VANGUARD OUTDOOR, LLC, a ⎫

California limited liability No. 10-56635

company,

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. ⎬ 2:08-cv-06035-

v. ABC-JWJ

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a California ORDER municipal corporation,

Defendant-Appellee. ⎭

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Audrey B. Collins, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted

May 2, 2011—Pasadena, California

Filed June 3, 2011

Before: John T. Noonan and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit

Judges, and Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge.*

COUNSEL

Benjamin P. Pugh (argued) and James S. Azadian, Enterprise

Counsel Group ALC, Irvine, California, for the plaintiffappellant.

*The Honorable Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, sitting by

designation. 

7309
Carmen A. Trutanich, Kenneth T. Fong (argued), Michael J.

Bostrom, and Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Los Angeles City

Attorney’s Office, Los Angeles, California, for the defendantappellee.

ORDER

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its

September 27, 2010 Amended Order Re: Plaintiffs’ Motion to

Amend Complaint; Motion for a Preliminary Injunction,

attached as Appendix A.

AFFIRMED.

7310 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
APPENDIX A

VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7311
7312 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7313
7314 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7315
7316 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7317
7318 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7319
7320 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7321
7322 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7323
7324 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7325
7326 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7327
7328 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7329
7330 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7331
7332 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7333
7334 VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES
VANGUARD OUTDOOR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 7335
EX PARTE John Dawson RUDOLPH II

CR-17-0230

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd.



|                                         |  |                              
|---------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                     |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                         | 
|China Digital TV Technology Co., Ltd.    |  | British Virgin Islands       
|                                         | 
|Golden Benefit Technology Limited        |  | Hong Kong                    
|                                         | 
|China Super Media Holdings Limited       |  | Hong Kong                    
|                                         | 
|Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd.               |  | Peoples Republic of China   
|                                         | 
|Beijing Cyber Cloud Co., Ltd.            |  | Peoples Republic of China   
|                                         | 
|N-S Investment Holdings Co., Ltd.        |  | Peoples Republic of China   
|                                         | 
|Beijing Joysee Technology Co., Ltd.      |  | Peoples Republic of China   
|                                         | 
|Beijing Super Movie Technology Co., Ltd. |  | Peoples Republic of China
Gerard David MCCREE, Jr. v. STATE

CR-16-1169

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied February 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. granted; memo of State 12/08/2017 withdrawn; memo substituted; affirmed.
Exhibit 10.43
 CONSTANT CONTACT, INC.
 
 Grant of Option.
   Vesting Schedule.
  Annex 1




---



##### 



Exercise of Option
 Form of Exercise
   Continuous Relationship with the Company Required
 Termination of Relationship with the Company provided that
 2




---



##### 



Exercise Period Upon Death or Disability provided that
 Termination for Cause nolo contendere
 Tax Matters.
 Withholding
 Disqualifying Disposition
 3




---



##### 



Nontransferability of Option.
  Provisions of the Plan.
   CONSTANT CONTACT, INC.Dated:
    By:Name:Title: 4




---



##### 



PARTICIPANTS ACCEPTANCE
  PARTICIPANT:Address: 5




---



##### 



Annex 1