alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

Per 45 CFR 2102.3, the next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for February 20, 2025, at 9 a.m. and will be held via online videoconference. Items of discussion may include buildings, infrastructure, parks, memorials, and public art.

                    Draft agendas, the link to register for the online public meeting, and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our website:                     *www.cfa.gov.*                     Inquiries regarding the agenda, as well as any public testimony, should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address; by emailing                     *cfastaff@cfa.gov;*                     or by calling 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                

Dated February 6, 2025, in Washington, DC.

Zakiya N. Walters,

Administrative Officer.

[FR Doc. 2025-02574 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-P
Charles L. DAVIS v. STATE

CR-16-1126

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018 Reh. denied March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 10(iii) (B)
 MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
ACCESS CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND, INC.
 THIS AGREEMENT
  ACCESS CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND, INC.
  ACCESS CAPITAL STRATEGIES LLC
  Whereas
 Whereas
 Now, therefore,
 Definitions and Interpretations
  Amendment
   Miscellaneous Provisions
    In witness whereof
 ACCESS CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND, INC.By:
    
    /s/  David F. SandName: David F. SandTitle: CEOACCESS CAPITAL STRATEGIES LLCBy:
    
    /s/  David F. SandName: David F. SandTitle: President
 36
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 228 

Designating May 15, 2021, as ‘‘Kids to Parks Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2021 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. 

HIRONO, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 15, 2021, as ‘‘Kids to Parks Day’’. 

Whereas the 11th annual Kids to Parks Day will be celebrated on May 15, 2021; 

Whereas the goals of Kids to Parks Day are to— 

(1) promote healthy outdoor recreation and responsible environmental stewardship; 

(2) empower young people; and 

(3) encourage families to get outdoors and visit the 

parks and public land of the United States; 

Whereas, on Kids to Parks Day, individuals from rural, suburban, and urban areas of the United States can be reintroduced to the splendid National, State, and neighborhood parks located in their communities; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 228 ATS 

Whereas communities across the United States offer a variety 

of natural resources and public land, often with free access, to individuals seeking outdoor recreation; 

Whereas the people of the United States, young and old, 

should be encouraged to lead more healthy and active 

lifestyles; 

Whereas Kids to Parks Day is an opportunity for families to 

take a break from their busy lives and enjoy a day of active, wholesome fun; and 

Whereas Kids to Parks Day will— 

(1) broaden an appreciation for nature and the outdoors in young people; 

(2) foster a safe setting for independent play and 

healthy adventure in neighborhood parks; and 

(3) facilitate self-reliance while strengthening communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 15, 2021, as ‘‘Kids to 

3 Parks Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of outdoor recre5 ation and the preservation of open spaces for the 

6 health and education of the young people of the 

7 United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe Kids to Parks Day with safe family trips 

10 to parks. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION UNDERSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofGTA-IB, LLC.

 
| Date: November 14, 2006 |   | /s/ W. Bradley Blair, II         |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                    |   | W. Bradley Blair, II             |   |   |
|                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|                    |   |                                  |   |   |
| Date: November 14, 2006 |   | /s/ Scott D. Peters                   |   |   |
|                    |   | Scott D. Peters                       |   |   |
|                    |   | Secretary and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JULIO CESAR HERNANDEZ-TORRES, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-50337 D.C. No. 3:11-cr-04508-BTM-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 3, 2015 Pasadena California Before: REINHARDT, N.R. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Julio Cesar Hernandez-Torres appeals his conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) for being a previously deported alien found in the United States without the consent of the Attorney General. 

# FILED
MAR 12 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.Hernandez first argues that it is unclear whether the jury unanimously agreed as to which of Hernandez’s three deportations provided the basis for the “previously deported” element of the crime. The jury, however, was properly instructed that all jurors had to agree unanimously on that point and “is presumed to follow its instructions.” Weeks v. Angelone , 528 U.S. 225, 234 (2000). Furthermore, in its verdict form, the jury stated: “We unanimously find that thegovernment has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant Julio CesarHernandez Torres was removed from the Un ited States subsequent to December 6, 2010.” Only one of Hernandez’s deporta tions, the one from July 26, 2011, took place “subsequent to December 6, 2010.” The verdict form thus shows that the jury must have unanimously agreed that Hernandez was deported on July 26, 2011. Hernandez’s argument that a mens rea of specific intent should have been required in his case is foreclosed by our precedent. Hernandez was charged with a “found in” offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and we have held that this is a general intent crime. See, e.g. , United States v. Rivera–Sillas , 417 F.3d 1014, 1020 (9th Cir. 2005). Hernandez also appears to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, arguing that his crime was not yet complete when Agent Ramirez found him one mile inside the country. Hernandez’s argument fails, 2however, because he was not “in the constant visual or physical grasp of governmental authorities after he crossed the border.” United States v. Vela–Robles , 397 F.3d 786, 789 (9th Cir. 2005)). While Hernandez appears to have triggered a seismic sensor upon crossing the border, “[d]etection by a seismic sensor does not amount to observation or surveillance for the purpose of showing official restraint.” Id
. The judgment of the district court is accordingly AFFIRMED.

3
Gerald Vandural WALKER v. STATE

CR-16-0764

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3815

___________________________

Samuel E. Haley, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Anthony Haynes et al.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________

 Submitted: May 7, 2015

Filed: May 13, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Federal parolee Samuel Haley appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the calculation of his sentence, alleged

violations of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, and raised a double jeopardy

claim. Following careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the

reasons stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas.

-2-
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 319 

Expressing support for the designation of July 2021 as ‘‘National Sarcoma 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2021 

Mr. JOHNSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of July 2021 as 

‘‘National Sarcoma Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas sarcoma is a cancer of connective tissues, such as 

nerves, muscles, joints, fat, bones, and blood vessels, that 

can arise anywhere in the body; 

Whereas, in the United States— 

(1) 16,000 individuals are diagnosed with sarcoma 

each year; 

(2) more than 7,000 individuals die from sarcoma 

each year; and 

(3) 50,000 individuals struggle with sarcoma at any 

1 time; 

Whereas, each year, 1 percent of cancers diagnosed in adults 

and 20 percent of cancers diagnosed in children are sarcoma; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 319 IS 

Whereas more than 70 subtypes of sarcoma have been identified; 

Whereas sarcoma is often misdiagnosed and underreported; 

and 

Whereas July 2021 would be an appropriate month to designate as National Sarcoma Awareness Month— 

(1) to raise awareness about sarcoma; and 

(2) to encourage more individuals in the United 

States to get properly diagnosed and treated: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation 

2 of July 2021 as ‘‘National Sarcoma Awareness Month’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a 

Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been 

filed in Case No. 3:17cv4642-WHO. A statement of non-opposition has been filed by defendant. 

As the judge assigned to lowest number case 

17-cv-00485-WHO

City and County of San Francisco v. Donald J. Trump

(and additional related cases 3:17cv574-WHO, 3:17cv1535-WHO, and 3:17cv4642-

WHO)

I find that the more recently filed case that I have initialed below is related to the cases

assigned to me, and such case shall be reassigned to me. 

Case Title Related Not 

Related

17-cv-04701-

MEJ

State of California, ex rel. XAVIER BECERRA, in hi v. 

Sessions

WHO

ORDER

The parties are instructed that all future filings in the reassigned case are to bear the 

initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management 

conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the 

dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. 

Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local 

Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to 

govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned 

judge.

Dated: August 25, 2017 By: ________________________

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 157 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 157 Filed 08/25/17 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1** 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** 

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****)**

 

We, Stephen G. Luke, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Nationwide Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), and Darren R. Dierich, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
|   | (1.) | the Quarterly Report on 10-QSB of Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|                    |   |                                     |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | **Nationwide Financial Solutions, Inc.** |
|                    |   |                                     |
| Date: November 14, 2005 |   | By:                                      |   | /s/ Stephen G. Luke

 

 

 

 

Stephen G. Luke

 

 

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

Date: November 14, 2005

 

By:

 

/s/ Darren R. Dierich

 

 

 

 

Darren R. Dierich

 

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD DE’VONN WEBB,

Plaintiff,

v.

C.E. DUCART, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00330-HSG (PR) 

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court’s Order of Dismissal, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in

favor of defendants and against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

9/29/2017
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000631 19-DEC-2019 07:50 AM
# L_2017079EN.01000601.xml

| 24.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/6

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/550

of 23 March 2017

on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the seventh partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage (2), and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure.

| (2) | In the light of the tenders received for the seventh partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the tenders received for the seventh partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should not be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the seventh partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 21 March 2017, a minimum selling price has not been fixed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p. 71.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 of 25 November 2016 opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure (OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 45).

3

---
Thearon SAMPSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0596

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)

sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)

egale@sagarialaw.com

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)

jangelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 100

Roseville, CA 95661

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION

TRACEY MCGIVNEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUIFAX, INC.; et. al.,

 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 4:17-CV-00346-SBA

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH 

DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT plaintiff Tracey McGivney and defendant Equifax, 

Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, have reached a settlement in principle of 

the above captioned case and are in the process of documenting said settlement. The parties 

believe the settlement should be finalized within 45 and a dismissal shall be filed. 

Sagaria Law, P.C.

Dated: July 20, 2017 /s/ Elliot Gale 

Elliot Gale

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:17-cv-00346-SBA Document 42 Filed 07/20/17 Page 1 of 1
# m8537.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 28.7.2017 C(2017) 5470 final To the notifying part y Subject : Case M. 853 7 - MOODY'S / BUREAU VAN DIJK ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 2 9 June 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Moody's Corporation ("Moody's", United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the undertaking Bureau Van Dijk Electronic Publishing BV (" BvD ", the Netherlands) by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Moody's: credit ratings, research, tools, analysis and professional services related to financial markets , - for BvD : company information and other business intelligence services . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 218 , 7 . 7 . 2017 , p. 22 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Ian TULLOCH, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D18-3004

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 9, 2019

Ian Tulloch, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.