Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 19 / Thursday, January 30, 2025 / Notices 8515 

1See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the 

Republic of Tu ̈rkiye: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 

89965 (November 14, 2024) (Final Results), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 

(IDM). 

2See Assan’s Letter, ‘‘Assan Group’s Ministerial 

Errors Allegations in the Antidumping Duty Final 

Results,’’ dated December 4, 2024; and Teknik’s 

Letter, ‘‘Teknik’s Ministerial Error Comments,’’ 

dated December 4, 2024. 

3See 19 CFR 351.224(f). 

recommendations the Corporation 

considers appropriate to improve 

Federal crop insurance coverage for 

organic crops’’. 

Authority: These data will be 

collected under the authority of 7 U.S.C. 

2204(a). Individually identifiable data 

collected under this authority are 

governed by Section 1770 of the Food 

Security Act of 1985 as amended, 7 

U.S.C. 2276, which requires USDA to 

afford strict confidentiality to nonaggregated data provided by 

respondents. This Notice is submitted in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13 

(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) and Office of 

Management and Budget regulations at 

5 CFR part 1320. 

All NASS employees and NASS 

contractors must also fully comply with 

all provisions of the Confidential 

Information Protection and Statistical 

Efficiency Act (CIPSEA) of 2018, Title 

III of Public Law 115–435, codified in 

44 U.S.C. ch. 35. CIPSEA supports 

NASS’s pledge of confidentiality to all 

respondents and facilitates the agency’s 

efforts to reduce burden by supporting 

statistical activities of collaborative 

agencies through designation of NASS 

agents, subject to the limitations and 

penalties described in CIPSEA. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average 43 minutes per 

response. 

Respondents: Farmers and Ranchers. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

27,000. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 9,500 hours (based on an 

estimated 80% response rate, using two 

questionnaire mail attempts, two 

pressure sealers/postcard mailings, and 

an Email blast, followed by phone and 

personal enumeration for nonrespondents). 

Comments: Comments are invited on: 

(a) whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, 

technological, or other forms of 

information technology collection 

methods. 

All responses to this notice will 

become a matter of public record and be 

summarized in the request for OMB 

approval. 

Signed at Washington, DC, January 21, 

2025. 

Joseph J. Prusacki, 

Associate Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01963 Filed 1–29–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–51–2024] 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 59; 

Authorization of Production Activity; 

Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., 

U.S.A.; (All-Terrain Vehicles); Lincoln, 

Nebraska 

On September 26, 2024, Kawasaki 

Motors Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A. 

submitted a notification of proposed 

production activity to the FTZ Board for 

its facility within Subzone 59A, in 

Lincoln, Nebraska. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (89 FR 80194, October 

2, 2024). On January 24, 2025, the 

applicant was notified of the FTZ 

Board’s decision that no further review 

of the activity is warranted at this time. 

The production activity described in the 

notification was authorized, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, including section 400.14. 

Dated: January 24, 2025. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01942 Filed 1–29–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–839] 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From 

the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye: Amended 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is amending the 

final results of the administrative review 

of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 

common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) 

from the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye (Tu ̈rkiye) 

to correct ministerial errors. Based on 

the amended final results, we find that 

the companies under review sold CAAS 

in the United States at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023. 

DATES: Applicable January 30, 2025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 14, 2024, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

final results of the 2022–2023 

administrative review of the AD order 

on CAAS from Tu ̈rkiye.1 On December 

4, 2024, Commerce received allegations 

of ministerial errors from Assan 

Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., 

Kibar Americas, Inc., and Kibar Dis 

Ticaret A.S. (collectively, Assan) and 

from Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. 

(Teknik).2 We received no rebuttal 

comments. Commerce is amending the 

Final Results to correct the ministerial 

errors. 

Legal Framework 

Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), defines a 

‘‘ministerial error’’ as including ‘‘errors 

in addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function, clerical errors 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

unintentional error which the 

administering authority considers 

ministerial.’’ 3 With respect to final 

results of administrative reviews, 19 

CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce 

‘‘will analyze any comments received 

and, if appropriate, correct any . . . 

ministerial error by amending the final 

results of review . . .’’ 

Ministerial Error 

Commerce reviewed the record, and 

we agree that the errors alleged by 

Assan and Teknik constitute ministerial 

errors within the meaning of section 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1