alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Andrew T. Drechsler, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Valera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (c) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                             /s/ Andrew T. Drechsler   Andrew T. Drechsler   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 25, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles G. Raymond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    CHARLES G.
RAYMOND            
|Charles G. Raymond                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        



November 2, 2005



41
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 ARLINGTON TANKERS LTD.
2007 BONUS PLAN
 1. Purpose
 2. Period Covered by Plan
 3. Eligibility Exhibit
A
 4. Bonus Payments Exhibit A Exhibit A
 5. Withholding Taxes
 6. Non-Assignability
 7. Amendment and Termination of this Plan




---



##### 



8. Administration
 9. Compliance With Code Section 409A
 10. Employment Rights
 11. Unfunded, Unsecured Obligation
 12. Governing Law
 13. Effective Date
 2




---



##### 



Exhibit A
  Objective
 Bonus Payment
     
 
   A-1




---



##### 



A-2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00645-CV

In re Louis Confer

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM CALDWELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Louis Confer, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has

filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus seeking credit for jail time. See Tex. Gov’t

Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. We deny the petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland

Filed: October 6, 2016
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 6th Floor

San Jose, CA 95110

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

WILLIAM SCRIPTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUIFAX, INC.; et. al.,

 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 3:17-CV-00348-EDL

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH 

DEFENDANT FIRST INVESTORS 

FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT plaintiff William Scripter and defendant First 

Investors Financial Services, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, have 

reached a settlement in principle of the above captioned case and are in the process of 

documenting said settlement. The parties anticipate that this matter will be dismissed within 30 

days. 

Sagaria Law, P.C.

Dated: February 17, 2017 /s/ Elliot Gale 

Elliot Gale

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:17-cv-00348-SBA Document 11 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 1
# **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S Security Corporation (the “Company”), dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Qurterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Companyfor the period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Periodic Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 17, 2005 |                    |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                          |                    |
|                          | /s/Ronald G. Farrell    |   |
|                          | Ronald G. Farrell,      |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4808-4809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00918]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

[[Page 4809]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 8, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1274 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1096, K2025-1095.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00918 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
null

548.3405
ORDER OF DETENTION 

CR 17-00041 HSG 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KENNETH LEDBETTER, 

Defendant. 

 Case No. CR 17-00041 HSG 

ORDER OF DETENTION 

The United States moved for pretrial detention pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 

3142(f)(1)(E) and a hearing was conducted on March 7, 2017. Defendant was present and in custody, 

represented by Assistant Federal Public Defender Hanni Fakhoury. The United States was represented 

by Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph M. Alioto Jr. 

Upon consideration of the parties’ proffers, the Pretrial Service Report, and the factors set forth 

in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or 

combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required, and it 

further finds by clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will 

reasonably assure the safety of any other person or the community. 

The instant case involves the possession of a firearm (18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(1)), and based on the 

proffer of the United States, the weight of the evidence is strong (18 U.S.C. §3142(g)(2)). The 

Case 4:17-cr-00041-HSG Document 14 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 2
ORDER OF DETENTION 

CR 17-00041 HSG 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

defendant has a history of daily drug use and has been diagnosed with mental conditions in the past. 18 

U.S.C. §3142(g)(3)(A). Although he only recently turned 19, the defendant has a relatively lengthy 

history of criminal convictions that include Carrying a Concealed Firearm, First Degree Robbery, and 

Burglary. Id. The defendant has never been employed. 18 U.S.C. §3142(g)(3)(A). Although the 

defendant has family ties in the community, where he has resided all of his life (18 U.S.C. 

§3142(g)(3)(A)), his grandmother was unwilling to offer her home as collateral to ensure the 

defendant’s future appearances in court, and a second person also declined to act as a surety. 

For those reasons, and for reasons articulated on the record and in the Pretrial Services Report, 

the Court orders the defendant detained. The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney 

General or a designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility. The defendant must be 

afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult privately with counsel. On order of a court of the United 

States or on request of an attorney for the United States, the person in charge of the corrections facility 

must deliver the defendant to the United States Marshal for a court appearance. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

DATED: March _____, 2017 

HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTMORE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

 

8

Case 4:17-cr-00041-HSG Document 14 Filed 03/08/17 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 21 (Monday, February 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02197]

[[Page 8819]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 6, 2025.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 30, 2025.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-02197 Filed 1-30-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
*

After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral

argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See Fed.

R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

October 20, 2006*

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 06-2622

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States 

District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois, 

Eastern Division.

No. 03 CR 886

Suzanne B. Conlon, 

Judge.

O R D E R

In Anthony Brown's initial appeal, this court affirmed his convictions but

ordered a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th

Cir. 2005). United States v. Gougis, 432 F.3d 735, 746 (7th Cir. 2005). The district

judge conducted the Paladino remand and advised us that she would have imposed

a shorter sentence had she known the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. 

Accordingly, on April 5, 2006, we vacated Anthony Brown's sentence and remanded

this case to the district court for resentencing. The district judge held a

resentencing hearing but denied Brown's request for a new Presentence Report and

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
No. 06-2622 Page 2

did not allow him to present evidence. The court imposed a sentence of 92 months,

five months shorter than Brown's original 97-month sentence. 

Brown now appeals, arguing that the district court committed reversible

procedural error by refusing to conduct a full, "clean slate" resentencing. We agree. 

Unlike the limited Paladino remand, in which the district judge was asked to

consider only the question of whether she would have imposed a lesser sentence

under an advisory Guidelines system, our April 5, 2006 order vacating Brown's

sentence and remanding for resentencing called for a complete—not

limited—resentencing. See United States v. White, 406 F.3d 827, 832 (7th Cir.

2005); United States v. Pollard, 56 F.3d 776, 777 (7th Cir. 1995). That did not occur

here. This is not to suggest that all the evidence Brown wanted to present should

have been received by the district court, only that the resentencing, like the original

sentencing, was not limited in nature and is governed by Rule 32 of the Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, we once again vacate Brown's sentence

and remand for resentencing. Circuit Rule 36 shall apply on remand.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 27, 2021

a0419

Order 

Clerk

April 27, 2021

161469

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161469

COA: 351691

Isabella CC: 15-001974-FH

SPENCER WAYNE BALE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2020 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 473 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the necessity of maintaining the 

United Nations arms embargo on South Sudan until conditions for 

peace, stability, democracy, and development exist. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2021 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. RISCH, and 

Mr. COONS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

APRIL 4 (legislative day, MARCH 31), 2022 

Reported by Mr. MENENDEZ, without amendment 

MAY 11, 2022 

Considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on the necessity of maintaining the United Nations arms embargo on South 

Sudan until conditions for peace, stability, democracy, 

and development exist. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) the signatories to the Revitalized Agreement 

3 on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of 

4 South Sudan, signed on September 12, 2018, have 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 473 ATS 

1 delayed implementation, leading to continued conflict 

2 and instability in South Sudan; 

3 (2) despite years of fighting, 2 peace agree4 ments, punitive actions by the international commu5 nity, and widespread suffering among civilian popu6 lations, the leaders of South Sudan have failed to 

7 build sustainable peace; 

8 (3) the United Nations arms embargo on South 

9 Sudan, most recently extended by 1 year to May 31, 

10 2022, through United Nations Security Council Res11 olution 2577 (2021), is a necessary act by the inter12 national community to stem the illicit transfer and 

13 destabilizing accumulation and misuse of small arms 

14 and light weapons in perpetuation of the conflict in 

15 South Sudan; 

16 (4) the United States should call on other mem17 ber states of the United Nations to redouble efforts 

18 to enforce the United Nations arms embargo on 

19 South Sudan; and 

20 (5) the United States, through the United 

21 States Mission to the United Nations, should use its 

22 voice and vote in the United Nations Security Coun23 cil in favor of maintaining the United Nations arms 

24 embargo on South Sudan until— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 473 ATS 

1 (A) the Revitalized Agreement on the Res2 olution of the Conflict in the Republic of South 

3 Sudan is fully implemented; or 

4 (B) credible, fair, and transparent demo5 cratic elections are held in South Sudan. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Reginald BRYANT v. STATE

CR-16-1077

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied February 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I,Craig R. Ramsey, certify that:

1.                 Ihave reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of MarqueeHoldings Inc.;

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

| Date: April 16, 2007 | /s/ CRAIG R.  RAMSEY                                  |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Craig R. Ramsey                                       |
|                 | Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

51

----
EXHIBIT 15

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-15 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1