alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-a

                                CONSENT OF EXPERT

         I consent to the reference to me under the heading "Item 3. Legal
Proceedings" in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Meritor Automotive, Inc.
("Meritor") for the year ended September 30, 1997, and to the incorporation by
reference of such reference into Meritor's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-35403) pertaining to the Meritor Savings Plan and
Meritor's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-35407)
pertaining to the Meritor 1997 Long-Term Incentives Plan.

                                                 /s/ M. Lee Murrah
                                                 -----------------------
                                                      M. Lee Murrah
                                               Assistant General Counsel of
                                                  Meritor Automotive, Inc.

Date:  December 19, 1997
# m8577.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.8.2017 C(2017) 5788 final To the notifying party Subject : Case M. 8577 – Norsk Hydro/ Sapa Commission decision pursuant to A rticle 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 24 July 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Norsk Hydro ASA (Norway) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Sapa AS (Norway) by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for undertaking Norsk Hydro: a global supplier of aluminium with activities throughout the value chain, including the production and sale of primary aluminium, soft-alloy extrusions, building systems and flat-rolled products, - for undertaking Sapa : a worldwide producer of aluminium products with three core activities: ( i ) soft alloy aluminium extrusions, (ii) building systems, and (iii) precision welded tubing. Sapa is a joint-venture currently jointly controlled by Norsk Hydro and Orkla ASA. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( d ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 247 , 29 . 7 . 2017 , p. 6 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Marcus O. MCCLAIN v. STATE

CR-16-0794

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Brian Keith KOEHLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3404

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 352 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 352

  Designating the week of September 6 through September 10, 2021, as 
    ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            August 10, 2021

Mr. Tuberville (for himself and Mr. Scott of South Carolina) submitted 
 the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of September 6 through September 10, 2021, as 
    ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities are degree-granting 
        institutions established prior to 1964 with the principal mission of 
        educating Black individuals in the United States;
Whereas there are over 100 accredited historically Black colleges and 
        universities located throughout 19 States, the District of Columbia, and 
        the United States Virgin Islands;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and 
        have played a prominent role in the history of the United States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have provided, and continue 
        to provide, a high-quality education that allows students at those 
        colleges and universities to attain their full potential through higher 
        education;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities serve as important engines 
        of economic growth and public service; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of September 6 through September 
        10, 2021, as ``National Historically Black Colleges and 
        Universities Week'';
            (2) declares that steps should be taken to raise awareness 
        of the contributions of historically Black colleges and 
        universities; and
            (3) calls on the people of the United States to observe the 
        week with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to 
        demonstrate support for historically Black colleges and 
        universities in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
1

NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Keith R. Gillette (Bar No. 191082)

kgillette@archernorris.com

Adrian T. Lambie (Bar No. 268247)

alambie@archernorris.com

ARCHER NORRIS

A Professional Law Corporation

2033 North Main Street, Suite 800

Walnut Creek, California 94596-3759

Telephone: 925.930.6600

Facsimile: 925.930.6620

Mark R. Figueiredo, Esq. (Bar No. 178850)

Ethan G. Solove, Esq. (Bar No. 308026)

Jaclyn M. Ford, Esq. (Bar No. 272641)

STRUCTURE LAW GROUP, LLP

1754 Technology Drive, Suite 135

San Jose, California 95110

Telephone: 408.441.7500

Facsimile: 408. 441.7501

Attorneys for Defendants 

INDYZEN, INC. and PRAVEEN NARRA KUMAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong Kong

corporation, by Mabel Mak, and MABEL

MAK, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation,

and PRAVEEN NARRA KUMAR, an

individual,

Defendants,

Case No.: 4:16-cv-07387-KAW

Judge: Hon. Kandis A. Westmore

NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF 

COUNSEL

TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES, AND COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Archer Norris, A Professional Law Corporation, hereby 

associates with Structure Law Group, LLP as counsel of record for Defendants Indyzen, Inc. and 

Praveen Narra Kumar (collectively, “Defendants”) in the above-captioned matter.

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 27 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 2
2

NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

All pleadings and papers served on Defendants should also be directed to:

Keith R. Gillette

kgillette@archernorris.com

Adrian T. Lambie 

alambie@archernorris.com

ARCHER NORRIS

A Professional Law Corporation

2033 North Main Street, Suite 800

Walnut Creek, California 94596-3759

Telephone: 925.930.6600

Facsimile: 925.930.6620

Dated: June 14, 2017 ARCHER NORRIS

/s/ Adrian T. Lambie

Adrian T. Lambie

Attorneys for Defendants 

INDYZEN, INC. and PRAVEEN NARRA 

KUMAR

Dated: June 14, 2017 STRUCTURE LAW GROUP, LLP

/s/ Mark R. Figueiredo

Mark R. Figueiredo

Attorneys for Defendants 

INDYZEN, INC. and PRAVEEN NARRA 

KUMAR

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(i)(3)

I, Adrian T. Lambie, attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing 

is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.

Dated: June 14, 2017 /s/ Adrian T. Lambie

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 27 Filed 06/14/17 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 33.2



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                 |  | 
|---- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  |  |  | Wilmington Trust Company
Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19890-0001

Management Assessment Report

Management of Wilmington Trust Corporation (the Corporation) is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)( iii) and 1122(d)(3) (iv) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of auto related asset-backed transactions
initiated or amended for purposes of Regulation AB on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Corporation provides trustee services (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. Management has determined that all other criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by the Corporation with respect to the Platform. Appendix A to this report identifies the auto related asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting
the Platform.

The Corporations management has assessed the Corporations compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in criterion (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(3)(i), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii) and (d)(3)(iv) of Item 1122
of Regulation AB. The activities the Corporation performs with respect to the applicable 1122(d) servicing criteria are listed on the attached Appendix A.

With respect to the Corporations obligation to issue a notification to be included in the clients Form
8-K. Form 10-D and Form 10-K under applicable servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(i), there were no activities performed during the
year ended December 31, 2017, with respect to the Platform, because there were no occurrences of events that would require the Corporation to perform such activities.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Corporation has complied in all material respects with
the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122 (d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii) and 1122(d)(3)(iv) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the
Platform.



---

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to
managements assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.



/s/ Patrick TadieName:

Patrick TadieTitle:

Group Vice PresidentICS Global Capital MarketsDate:

February 27, 2018
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                Animal Health Literacy

Animal Health Literacy Home
          Animal & Veterinary
          Resources for You
          Animal Health Literacy
          General ResourcesAnimal Health Literacy General Resources
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    Printsheep
Animal Drugs
	From an Idea to the Marketplace: The Journey of an Animal Drug through the Approval Process

Innovation in Animal Drug Development

A Look at the European Medicines Agency

All Creatures Great and Small: Properly Medicate Them All

Animal Food
	Agricultural Biotechnology Education and Outreach Initiative

Animal Devices
	How FDA Regulates Animal Devices

Other News and Updates
	In Plain English, Please

One Health: It’s for All of Us

Animal & Veterinary Consumer Updates

CVM Updates

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      03/25/2022Animal Health Literacy
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Patrick THURMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3772

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William Frederick, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pharsight Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 22, 2007



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    WILLIAM
FREDERICK                                             
|William Frederick                                                    
|Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andCorporate Secretary
Richard SHEPPARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-638

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 18, 2019

Richard Sheppard, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. Whitehead*, 472 So.2d 730, 731-32 (Fla. 1985) ("[P]ursuant to section 775.087(1), a first-degree felony shall be reclassified to a life felony if a weapon or firearm is used ..."); *State v. Smith*, 470 So.2d 764, 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) ("Second degree murder is a felony of the first degree, and when committed with a firearm, is reclassified as a life felony." (internal citation omitted) (citing § 775.087(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983) ; *Strickland v. State*, 437 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1983) )).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NUMBER

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT

TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

Plaintiff(s), v.

Defendant(s).

Date

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c) CCD-9

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: (Check one)

This action is dismissed by the Plaintiff(s) in its entirety.

dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety.

ONLY Defendant(s)

The Counterclaim brought by Claimant(s)

The dismissal is made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a) or (c).

Signature of Attorney/Party

F.R.Civ.P. 41(c): Counterclaims, cross-claims & third-party claims may be dismissed before service of a responsive

NOTE: F.R.Civ.P. 41(a): This notice may be filed at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for

summary judgment, whichever first occurs.

CV-09 (03/10)

PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)

The Cross-Claim brought by Claimant(s)

The Third-party Claim brought by Claimant(s)

dismissed by Claimant(s) in its entirety.

pleading or prior to the beginning of trial.

brought by

is

is/are dismissed from (check one)

is

Complaint,

dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

Counterclaim, Cross-claim, Third-Party Claim

.

Adam T. Hoover (SBN 243226)

REICH RADCLIFFE & HOOVER LLP

4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 550

Newport Beach, CA 92660

(949) 975-0512

DONALD ROLLAND, Individually and On Behalf of 

All Others Similarly Situated

REWALK ROBOTICS, LTD. , et al.

3:17-cv-00362-HSG

x

March 23, 2017

Adam T. Hoover

Case 4:17-cv-00362-HSG Document 5 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISON

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

NURSE REISENHOOVER, et. al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-0326-NJV (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION;

DENYING MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION

Docket Nos. 17, 21, 22

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint. Plaintiff’s motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) was denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 19.) The 

court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or face dismissal of the case. Id. Plaintiff has filed a 

motion to alter or amend the judgment. (Doc. 22.) No judgment has been entered in this case. 

Therefore the court will construe Plaintiff's motion as a motion for reconsideration.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for “Motions for Reconsideration”; 

such motions are created by local rules or practice. In the Northern District of California, Local 

Rule 7-9 allows for the filing of motions for reconsideration only with respect to interlocutory 

orders made in a case prior to the entry of final judgment. See Civil L.R. 7-9(a). No pre-judgment 

motion for reconsideration under Local Rule 7-9 may be brought without leave of court. See Civil 

L.R. 7-9(a). The moving party must specifically show: (1) that at the time of the motion for leave, 

a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the court before entry 

of the interlocutory order for which the reconsideration is sought, and that in the exercise of 

reasonable diligence the party applying for reconsideration did not know such fact or law at the 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

time of the interlocutory order; or (2) the emergence of new material facts or a change of law 

occurring after the time of such order; or (3) a manifest failure by the court to consider material 

facts which were presented to the court before such interlocutory order. See Civil L.R. 7-9(b). 

Plaintiff has failed to show new law or facts that occurred after the court issued its order. 

Therefore, the motion to alter or amend (Docket No. 22) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion for an 

extension is (Docket No. 21) is GRANTED and plaintiff must pay the full filing fee within 

twenty-eight days of the issuance of this order or the case will be dismissed. Plaintiff’s motion to 

amend the complaint (Docket No. 17) is DENIED without prejudice and the court will consider 

an amended complaint if plaintiff pays the full filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 25, 2017

________________________

NANDOR J. VADAS

United States Magistrate Judge