Exhibit 24

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-5 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 6
·1· · · ·IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

· · · · · ·NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

·2· · · · · · · · ·SAN JOSE DIVISION

·3· · · · · · · · · · ·- - - - -

·4· FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

· · · · · · · Plaintiff,

·5· · · · · · vs.· · · · · No.17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

· · QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

·6· a Delaware Corporation;

· · · · · · · Defendant.

·7

· · · · · · · · · · · ·- - - - -

·8

· · IN RE: QUALCOMM ANTITRUST

·9· LITIGATION· · · · · · ·No.17-md-02773-LHK-NMC

10· · · · · · · · · · ·- - - - -

· · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11· · · · · SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12· IN RE:

13· QUALCOMM LITIGATION· · No.3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD

14· · · · · · · · · · ·- - - - -

15· · · HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

16· · · · · · · · · · ·- - - - -

17· · · · · · · Tuesday, April 3, 2018

18· · · · · · · · · · ·- - - - -

19· · · · · · Video Deposition of RANAE McELVAINE,

20· taken at law offices of Volpe & Koenig, 30

21· South 17th Street, 18th Floor, Philadelphia,

22· Pennsylvania, commencing at 9:06 a.m., by and

23· before Robin L. Clark, Registered Professional

24· Reporter and Notary Public in and for the

25· Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-5 Filed 11/28/18 Page 2 of 6
·1· me just read into the record topic B, small

·2· letter "b" near the top of page 4.· It reads

·3· "whether and why or why not the company has

·4· been willing to grant licenses under its

·5· relevant SEPs to relevant product suppliers to

·6· make, use, sell, offer to sell, or import

·7· relevant products or other cellular

·8· communications equipment components."· And then

·9· beneath that is InterDigital's response,

10· correct?

11· · · · ·A.· ·Correct.

12· · · · 

19· · · · ·Q.· ·Let me just read into the record

20· the first few sentences of InterDigital's

21· response.· 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-5 Filed 11/28/18 Page 3 of 6
·1· 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-5 Filed 11/28/18 Page 4 of 6
·1· 

14· · · · ·Q.· ·All right.· Let me continue on,

15· topic C, near the bottom of page 4.· This is

16· lower case "c," reads "whether the company has

17· been willing to grant licenses to discrete

18· subsets of its patents (e.g. relevant SEPs only

19· or relevant SEPs limited to a particular

20· relevant standard group)."

21· · · · · · · · Let me stop there.· Then

22· following that starting on the bottom of page 4

23· is InterDigital's response, correct?

24· · · · ·A.· ·That's correct.

25· · · · ·Q.· ·Let me just read into the record a

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-5 Filed 11/28/18 Page 5 of 6
·1· · · · · · ·CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER

·2· · · · · · I, Robin Clark, a Certified Shorthand

·3· Reporter, hereby certify that the witness in

·4· the foregoing deposition was by me duly sworn

·5· to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing

·6· but the truth in the within-entitled cause;

·7· · · · · · That said deposition was taken down

·8· in shorthand by me, a disinterested person, at

·9· the time and place therein stated, and that the

10· testimony of the said witness was thereafter

11· reduced to typewriting, by computer, under my

12· direction and supervision;

13· · · · · · That before completion of the

14· deposition, review of the transcript [· ] was

15· [· ] was not requested. If requested, any

16· changes made by the deponent (and provided to

17· the reporter) during the period allowed are

18· appended hereto.

19· · · · · · I further certify that I am not of

20· counsel or attorney for either or any of the

21· parties to the said deposition, nor in any way

22· interested in the event of this cause, and that

23· I am not related to any of the parties thereto.

24· DATED:· April 4, 2018

25· RPR NO. 12447_____________________________

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-5 Filed 11/28/18 Page 6 of 6