alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 23, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00335

- CR

Stephaney Veljean Lafears , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND THEOFANIS
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the purported order entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed the

record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00704-CV

Jacquelyn Vaye Abbott, Appellant

v.

Timothy Mark Cameron Abbott, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 06-0280, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on November 16, 2006. On January 25, 2007,

the district clerk informed this Court that appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

clerk’s record. That same day, we sent appellant a letter requiring her to submit a status report by

February 5, 2007, informing her that her failure to do so would result in the dismissal of her appeal.

To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed, and appellant has neither filed a status report nor

responded in any manner to our January 25 letter. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 21, 2007
Ricardo ALVES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Sharon ALVES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1352

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matrix Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  December  31,  2005 as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.

Date: March 14, 2006


/s/ Erika Kumar
------------------------------------
Erika Kumar
Principal Financial Officer
Khen TANG, Appellant, v. Hong P. LY, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2754

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christian BORGWALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2171

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2019 Rehearing Denied Date May 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Aloysius T. HENRY v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-16-0993

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    They are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Community Bancorp, a Nevada Corporation (the Company).2.
    
    Based on their knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended nine, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Edward M. JamisonEdward
M. JamisonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Patrick HartmanPatrick HartmanExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHIRON CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

    v.

SOURCECF INC., SOURCECF CLINICALRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.,MAXOR NATIONAL PHARMACY SERVICESCORPORATION d/b/a IV SOLUTIONS,FOUNDATION CARE L.L.C., andPHARMACEUTICAL SPECIALTIES, INC.,

Defendant.                                                                                /

No. C 05-01938 WHA

ORDER VACATING CLAIMCONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

In light of the parties’ joint representations that there is no dispute as to the meaning of

any claim term, phrase or clause, the parties need not comply with the claim construction

schedule previously set forth by orders dated August 4, 2005 and August 22, 2005. 

Specifically, the technology tutorial and Markman hearing, currently scheduled for

OCTOBER 19, 2005 AT 1:30 P.M. and NOVEMBER 16, 2005 AT 1:30 P.M., are VACATED.  The

parties are requested to submit a stipulated dismissal of all claims or otherwise update the Court

on the status of their settlement on or before NOVEMBER 7, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  September 29, 2005                                                               WILLIAM ALSUPUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case3:05-cv-01938-WHA   Document32    Filed09/29/05   Page1 of 1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Rafeh Hulays, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Netfone, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Netfone, Inc. for the nine month period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Netfone, Inc.

Date: May 12, 2006

/s/ Rafeh Hulays                                              

Rafeh Hulays

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial 

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Carl Alexander JORDAN, DOC #N09262, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1980

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

Ex

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/      Richard W. McCullough   |   | December      18, 2009 |
|----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| Richard      W. McCullough             |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer           |   |
| Petroleum      Development Corporation |   |
| Managing      General Partner          |   |
|                                   |   |                   |
|                                   |   |                   |
|  /s/      Gysle R. Shellum        |   | December      18, 2009 |
| Gysle      R. Shellum                  |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer           |   |
| Petroleum      Development Corporation |   |
| Managing      General Partner          |   |
|                                   |   |                   |

----
#### Jose A. NUÑEZ-SANTIAGO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PUERTO RICO ELECTRICAL POWER AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants, Appellants, v. Caribbean Restaurants, et al., Cross-Defendants, Appellees.

No. 03-1745.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

May 5, 2004.

Evan Slavitt, with whom Bodoff *&*Slavitt LLP, David C. Indiano, Alexander, Bopp and Indiano & Williams, P.S.C. were on brief, for appellants.

Amando Arias Guardiola, with whom Arias Cestero & Arias Guardiola was on brief, for appellees.

Before SELYA and HOWARD, Circuit Judges, and SINGAL,* District Judge.

*

 Of the district of Maine, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Jose Alberto Núñez Gomez, then three years old, was injured on March 21, 1999 when he placed his hand inside an unlocked electrical box owned by Puerto Rico Electrical Power Authority (“PREPA”) and located near a Burger King restaurant operated by Caribbean Restaurants. The child and his parents sued the electric company and Caribbean Restaurants, together with various other defendants, for negligence under Puerto Rico’s civil code. PREPA cross-claimed against Caribbean Restaurants.

At trial, the district court granted Caribbean Restaurants’ motions for judgment as a matter of law against both the plaintiffs and PREPA, ruling that there was insufficient evidence upon which a jury could find that Caribbean Restaurants had breached a duty of care. The jury found PREPA to have been negligent and awarded damages. After the verdict but before judgment was entered against it, PREPA settled with the plaintiffs. Now PREPA appeals the judgments as a matter of law in Caribbean Restaurants’ favor, apparently seeking to force Caribbean Restaurants to contribute to the settlement payments to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are not involved in this appeal.

Orders granting motions for judgment as a matter of law are reviewed *de novo. Hochen v. Bobst Group, Inc.,*290 F.3d 446, 453 (1st Cir.2002). Like the district court, this court examines the evidence and all fair inferences in the light most favorable to the non-movant to determine whether the non-movant has offered “more than a mere scintilla of evidence” warranting the submission of the issue to the jury. *Id.*A district court’s order of judgment as a matter of law will be affirmed only if “applying these standards, the evidence does not permit a reasonable jury to find in favor of appellants.” *Id.*

Having reviewed the record in the light of this standard of review, this court is fully satisfied that the district court acted appropriately in granting Caribbean Restaurants’ motions for judgment as a matter *4of law. The facts are well known to the parties, and a fact-intensive written analysis would be of no import to anyone other than them. The rulings below are *affirmed.*
#### Jacklynn HERITAGE, Appellant, v. PRADCO OUTDOOR BRANDS; EBSCO Industries, Inc. Appellees.

No. 03-2968.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2004.

Decided May 4, 2004.

Winford L. Dunn, Jr., Lisa Mills Wilkins, Dunn *&*Nutter, Texarkana, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kathlyn G. Graves, Bettina E. Brown-stein, William Stuart Jackson, Wright *&*Lindsey, Little Rock, AR, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jacklynn Heritage appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude summary judgment was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Westem District of Arkansas.
Anthony FOWLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1917

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 16, 2019. Rehearing Denied February 14, 2019

Anthony Fowler, in proper person.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Campbell v. State*, 29 So.3d 1147 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding that burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery, a first-degree felony punishable by life imprisonment, is a qualifying offense *93under the prison releasee reoffender statute). *See also* §§ 775.082(9)(a)1.g. & q., Fla. Stat. (2001) (providing that "robbery" and "[b]urglary of a dwelling or burglary of an occupied structure" are qualifying offenses under the prison releasee reoffender provisions of section 775.082); § 775.087(1)(b) ) (providing that if, during the commission of a felony, a defendant commits an aggravated battery, the felony shall be reclassified from a second-degree felony to a first-degree felony); § 775.082(9)(a)3.a.-b., Fla. Stat. (2001) (providing that if the State establishes "that a defendant is a prison releasee reoffender ... such defendant is not eligible for sentencing under the sentencing guidelines and must be sentenced as follows: a. For a felony punishable by life, by a term of imprisonment for life; b. For a felony of the first degree, by a term of imprisonment of 30 years").
Joseph Ray SHOOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3095

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# L_2017006EN.01003601.xml

| 11.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 6/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 6/36

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/44

of 10 January 2017

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 28 December 2016, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove 2 entries from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 28 December 2016, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove 2 entries from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 January 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Acting Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, the following entries are deleted:

| ‘78. | MEDICAL CITY ESTABLISHMENT. Address: Baghdad, Iraq. |
| --- | --- |

‘78.

| 115. | STATE COMPANY FOR DRUGS AND MEDICAL APPLIANCES (alias (a) GENERAL ESTABLISHMENT FOR DRUGS & MEDICAL APPLICANCES, (b) KIMADIA), Address: Mansour City, P.O. Box 6138, Baghdad, Iraq.’ |
| --- | --- |

115.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 13, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 3, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 611 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1169, K2025-1169.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-02561 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Todd Michael BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1525

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
James G. TANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3904

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
#### Thomas S. SUKHU, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Respondent.

No. 04-3111.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: April 15, 2004.

John S. Groat, Principal Attorney, Brian M. Simkin, David M. Cohen, of Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

George M. Johnson, Principal Attorney, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Thomas S. Sukhu’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his petition for review,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 

90 FR 8215.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 

Thursday, January 30, 2025 at 10 a.m.

# HYBRID MEETING: 

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th Floor) and virtual.

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING: 

The following items were also discussed:

Sample Donor Response Form for Contributions by LLCs

Two-Year Renewal of Directive 74

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer. Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2025-02210 Filed 1-30-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report of
on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies that: Based on my knowledge,

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    DAVID E. TRINEDavid E. TrineChief Financial Officer


February 27, 2007
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 1 of 9

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 2 of 9

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 3 of 9

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 4 of 9

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 5 of 9

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 6 of 9

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 7 of 9

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 8 of 9

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK   Document 869-3   Filed 09/24/18   Page 9 of 9
Ladessa Carol LEBLANC v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

NO. 2019-C-0654

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant.
Benedict MOHIT, Individually, and as Trustee for Gita Nagassar Mohit Family Trust, Appellant, v. CITY OF HAINES CITY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4387

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.