alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Hackett, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 11, 2008

| |                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | /s/ David F. Hackett                           
| | David F. Hackett                               
| | Chief Executive Officer and President, Director
| | Gulfstream International Group, Inc.
1 

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

Case No.. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SULLIVAN

& 

CROMWELL LLP

Nathaniel L. Green (State Bar No. 260568) 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 461 - 5600 

Facsimile: (650) 461 - 5700 

greenn@sullcrom.com 

Attorney for Non-Party Via Licensing Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF 

COUNSEL 

TO THE COURT AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Laura Kabler Oswell (SBN 241281) of the law firm of Sullivan 

& Cromwell LLP, 1870 Embarcadero Road, Palo Alto, California 94303-3308, telephone no.: 

650-461-5600, email address: oswelll@sullcrom.com, shall replace Nathaniel L. Green as counsel of 

record for Non-Party Via Licensing Corporation, effective immediately. 

Date: December 21, 2018 

/s/ Nathaniel L. Green

Nathaniel L. Green (SBN 260568) 

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 

1870 Embarcadero Road

Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 461-5600 

Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 

Attorney for Non-Party Via Licensing 

Corporation

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1033 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                         and Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

      I, Irwin Balaban,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of Robocom Systems  International  Inc. (the  "Registrant"),  do hereby certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to the best of my  knowledge,  based upon a
review of the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 of
the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"):

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


                                       By:  /s/ Irwin Balaban
                                          -------------------------------------
                                             Name:  Irwin Balaban
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Principal Financial and Accounting
                                             Officer

August 3, 2007

-------------------------

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 has been provided to Robocom  Systems  International
Inc. and will be retained by Robocom Systems International Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       32
Order entered September 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00829-CV

IN RE JEROME JOHNSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F01-53637-JH

ORDER

Before the Court are relator’s September 19, 2019 pro se motions for judicial notice, to 

stay the mandamus proceedings with motion to abate, and motion for an abatement of 

proceedings in the interest of justice.1 Relator is represented by counsel in this matter. Relator is 

not entitled to hybrid representation. See Marshall v. State, 144 S.W.3d 618, 620 n.1 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2006). Moreover, on September 18, 2019, the Court issued its opinion and order 

denying relief on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

Relator’s motions are DENIED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 

 

1 Relator has also filed an objection to a State’s response that applies only to his mandamus action pending in cause 

no. 05-19-00708-CV.
Jennifer L. KARR, Appellant, v. NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4679

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa (withdrew after briefing), Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, PLLC, Tampa (withdrew after briefing), and Christopher Hixson of Athena Law, PLLC, Largo, for Appellant.

Melissa A. Giasi and Robert L. Chapman of Sivyer Barlow & Watson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited financial statements for the periods shown below and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          58,367                 199,826
<SECURITIES>                                    31,277                  31,225
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,331                  15,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                       917                     631
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,231,386               1,047,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                 166,072                 159,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,551,506               1,646,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                        772,156                 862,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    277,168                 276,599
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     436,145                 440,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,551,506               1,646,296
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,827                  79,959
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,557                  26,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,995                  25,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,972                  17,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,704                  25,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,704                  25,578
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,008                  18,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56                     .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54                     .35


</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

p0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140966

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140966 COA: 286772 Isabella CC: 07-001358-FH RONALD ARTHUR POLK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of th e Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

__________________________________ _______ Clerk December 22, 2010

d1215 

# Order

December 22, 2010

142140 & (61)

AFSCME COUNCIL 25,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 142140

COA: 298655

Wayne CC: 07

- 708765

- CK

COUNTY OF WAYNE,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

THIRD CIRCUIT COURT,

Intervening Defendant

- Appellant.

__________________ _______________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the November 5, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions

presented should be reviewed by this Court. The Court of Appeals is DIRECTED to

decide this case on an expedited basis, in light of the importance of the issues before that

court.
Rico S. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3965

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Clark v. State*, 790 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 2001) ; *Brinson v. State*, 851 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; *Smith v. State*, 151 So. 3d 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

STAY

Re: Dkt. No. 509

FTC’s Motion for Stay in Light of United States Government Cessation is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 510 Filed 01/22/18 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 2, 2018

a0924

Order 

Clerk

October 2, 2018

156916

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156916

COA: 340012

Wayne CC: 99-010005-FC

STEVEN BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2017 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Anthony SPILLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Unassociated Document


     

    EXHIBIT
4.7


    Incorporated
in the British Virgin Islands

     

    GOLDEN
GREEN ENTERPRISES LIMITED

     

    This is
to certify that

     

    Is/are
the registered shareholders of:

     

    
      	
              No.
      of Shares

            	
              Type
      of Share

            	
              Par
      Value

               

            
	 
      	
              Ordinary

            	
              US$                          0.0000000000

               

            
	
              Date
      of Record

            	
              Certificate
      Number

            	
              %
      Paid

               

            
	 
      	 
      	
               
      

               

            


    

     

    The above
shares are subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company
and transferable in accordance therewith.

    Given
under the Common Seal of the Company

     

     
_______________________________
Director                 
    _______________________________
Director/Secretary
Welcome to the 2022 

FCSM Research & Policy Conference

Shelly Wilkie Martinez (OIRA/OMB)

Chair, FCSM

October 25, 2022
Acknowledgements & Disclaimer

The Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology thanks all of the 

speakers and other participants in the 2022 FCSM Conference; the 

conference organizing committee, COPAFS; and the Washington 

Convention Center.

The views expressed here are those of the speakers and do not 

necessarily represent the policies of the Federal Committee on 

Statistical Methodology.
2022 FCSM Conference Executive Planning Committee

Jessica Graber, Chair, National Center of Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Statistics

Jeff Gonzalez, Co-Chair, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor

Darius Singpurwalla, Co-Chair, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science 

Foundation

David Kashihara, Co-Chair, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Paul Schroeder, Conference Liaison & Executive Director, Council of Professional Associations on 

Federal Statistics

Linda Young, FCSM Liaison, National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of 

Agriculture
Scott Boggess, U.S. Census Bureau

Richard Chard, Social Security Administration

Yang Cheng, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Stephanie Coffey, U.S. Census Bureau

Joe Conklin, Bureau of Justice Statistics

Ben Franco, Social Security Administration

Ellen Galantucci, Federal Maritime Commission

Jessica Holzberg, U.S. Census Bureau

Kyle Hood, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

Tiandong Li, Department of Housing and Urban 

Development

Janine McFadden, Bureau of Transportation Statistics

Ann Miller, Department of Interior

Chris Moriarity, National Center for Health Statistics

Xuan Pham, Economic Research Service

Jennifer Rhorer, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Maura Spiegelman, National Center for Education Statistics 

Doug Williams, Bureau of Labor Statistics

2022 FCSM Conference Planning Committee Members
2022 FCSM Conference

Great Expectations: New Directions and Innovations 

for Sustainable Federal Statistics

Plenary Sessions

October 25:

• Karin Orvis, Chief Statistician of the United States

• Rob Santos, United States Census Bureau

October 26:

• Xiao-Li Meng, Harvard University
Linda Renee EVERETT, Appellant, v. Carl Edward EVERETT, Jr., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2838

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MELVIN SUMLER, a/k/a Clever,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-96-116)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Sumler, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Sumler appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Sumler, No. CR-96-116

(E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                 |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

| */s/                  Hugh McClung*                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Hugh                  McClung Chief                  Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:                  November 13, 2007   |   |   |   |

----
Donald BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
ALD
- 059 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11

- 421 9

___________ IN RE: CLAUDIA WILTBANK

- JOHNSON , Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus

_____ _______________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

December 15, 2011 Before: SLOVITER, FISHER AND NYGAARD , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed December 2 0 , 2011 )

______ ___ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Claudia Wiltbank

- Johnson , proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a peti tion for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 , apparently r equesting tha t this Court order the Delaware state courts to “dismi ss all mock cases” against her

. Mandamus is a drastic remedy that is granted only in extraordinary cases. See In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig. , 418 F .3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). Traditionally, it may be “used to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so.” Id. (internal citation and quotation omitted). To demonstrate that mandamus is appropriate, a petitioner must2

establish that he or she has “no other adequate means” t o obtain the relief requested, and that he or she has a “clear and indisputable” right to issuance of the writ. Madden v. Myers , 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996). Here, there is no basis for granting the petition for a writ of mandamus, as Wiltbank

- Johnson does not have a “clear and indisputable” to the relief requested

. Wiltbank

- Johnson has been involved in litigation in the Delaware state courts that apparently concerns her father’s estate. She has also filed a law suit in t he United States District Cou rt for the District of Delaware that references the state court proceedings. 1 (D. Del. Civ. No. 11

- cv - 617.) While Wiltbank

- Johnson’s petition is not easily understood , she seems to want this Court to compel the Delaware state courts to dismiss cases filed against her and to enjoin certain attorneys from litigating against her. However, state courts are not “inferior courts,” over which we have mandamus power,
and we cannot compel action by state courts or officials in connec tion with state court proceedings. See In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 654 F.2d 268, 278 (3d Cir. 1981). Further, we lack authority to compel the attorneys referenced in the petition to act in accordance with Wiltbank

- Johnson’s wishes. For the foregoing reasons , Wiltbank

- Johnson’ s petition for a writ of mandamus will be denied.

1 Wiltbank

- Johnson’s petition for a writ of mandamus does not appear to request that we compel the District Court to take any action. We note that the District Court has ruled on Wiltbank

- Johnson’s cause of action, and that she has appealed to this Court from the District Court’s orders. ( See C .A. No. 11

- 4042.)
Ricardo ESPILDORA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
L.L.T. v. STATE

CR-16-0925

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EXHIBIT 11

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-11 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2013.

In The


## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00184

- CV

MARIA SUAREZ , Appellant

V.

DOW CORNING CORPORAT ION, CHI LI ROBINSON MD, JAMES R

. CULLINGTON MD, FRANC IS BURTON MD, SIMON FRED ERICKS MD, TOLBERT WILKINSON MD , 21 INTERNATIONAL H OLDINGS FKA KNOLL INTERNATIONAL, MILTON ROWLEY MD, WE SLEY WASHBURN MD, PRESTON J. CHANDLER MD, WILSHIR E FOAM PRODUCTS INC., ERNES T CRONIN MD, JAMES P ETERSON MD, THOMAS D. CRONIN MD, FRANK J. GEROW MD, G ENE RAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, and DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1992

- 25394 EB



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order signed January 29, 2013. On March 27

, 2013, appe llant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App.2

P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher and McCally.