alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981)

SJSagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)

EGale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (SBN 268542)

JAngelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste 100

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 297-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Julie Greenhow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION

JULIE GREENHOW,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00417-JSW

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Julie Grenhow and defendant 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc. that Experian Information Solutions, Inc. be dismissed 

from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), 

and that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

//

//

//

//

Case 4:17-cv-00417-JSW Document 51 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: September 18, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By:

Elliot Gale

/s/ Elliot Gale

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Julie Greenhow

DATED: September 18, 2017 Jones Day

By:

Celia M. Jackson

/s/ Celia M. Jackson

Attorney for Defendant 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Celia M. Jackson has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is 

dismissed with prejudice and each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:17-cv-00417-JSW Document 51 Filed 09/18/17 Page 2 of 2
EX PARTE Decory KNIGHT

1170032 (CR-16-0640)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Bobby M. BEENE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3429

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Napoleon REDDICK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1959

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFPERIODIC REPORT**

The undersignedChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee Holdings Inc. (the “Company”),each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 28,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

(2)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:February 14, 2007
| /s/ PETER  C. BROWN                                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Peter C. Brown                                                |   |
| Chairman of the Board,  Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| /s/ CRAIG R. RAMSEY                                           |   |
| Craig R. Ramsey                                               |   |
| Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer         |   |

 

[A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee HoldingsInc. and will be retained by Marquee Holdings Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

54

----
James R. DOWNES v. STATE

CR-17-0175

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 306 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 306

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
            Jennifer Grappell v. Alberto M. Carvalho, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2021

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 
            Jennifer Grappell v. Alberto M. Carvalho, et al.

Whereas, Senator Marco Rubio has been named as a defendant in the case of 
        Jennifer Grappell v. Alberto M. Carvalho, et al., Case No. 21-cv-22016, 
        currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern 
        District of Florida;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions 
        relating to their official responsibilities: Now therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Senator Rubio in the case of Jennifer Grappell v. Alberto M. Carvalho, 
et al.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Tagalder Global Investment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Chun Ka Tsun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Chun Ka TsunChun Ka Tsun, Chief Financial Officer May 25, 2007
Molar GOURY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida and Bob Gualtieri, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1593

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-17-00580-CV

Style: Art Shaban v. The Hertz Corporation

Date motion filed*: December 11, 2017

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Appellate Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant Art Shaban’s counsel, Peter J. Clarke Jr.

Document to be filed: Evidence of payment for Clerk’s Record

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: N/A

Date Requested: January 31, 2018

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part

 Denied (without prejudice)

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Although the reporter’s record was filed on November 10, 2017, the Clerk of this Court 

notified appellants on October 13, 2017, that the clerk’s record had not been filed due 

to appellant’s lack of payment, and requested that appellant provide evidence of 

payment for that record by November 13, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

Accordingly, appellant’s brief extension request is denied without prejudice to 

refiling after the clerk’s record is filed. See id. 38.6(a)(1) (noting that appellant’s brief 

is due 30 days after later of the date the clerk’s or reporter’s record is filed). However,

if appellant fails to provide evidence of payment for the clerk’s record within 10

days of the date of this Order, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution 

without further notice. See id. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting for the Court

Date: December 21, 2017
EX PARTE Demetrice HINES

CR-17-0140

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 29 (Thursday, February 13, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02561]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 13, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 3, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
611 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1169, K2025-1169.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-02561 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-698

_____________________________

CEDRIC WILLIAMS-DANIELS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Meredith Charbula, Judge.

September 14, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Cedric Williams-Daniels, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of RxBids (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, **Mack Bradley**, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,            pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **MACKBRADLEY** |
|-----|-----------------|

 

**Mack Bradley**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

April 10, 2009

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or            its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 22

- 00168

- CV

IN RE WEAVER CONSULTANTS GROUP, LLC

AND ANCHOR CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Original Proceeding

______________

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Cour t No. 1929322

MEMORA NDUM OPINION

Before the Court are the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and the Motion to

Dismiss Mandamus Proceeding filed by Relator s Weaver Consultants Group, LLC and

Anchor Construction, LLC. We grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss this original

proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).

MATT JOHNSON

JusticeIn re Weaver Consultants Page 2 Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Sm ith

Dismissed; motion gra nted

Opinion delivered and filed June 29, 2022

[OT06]
Discounts & Bundles

Visit the link below for available billing discounts and pricing 

options for broadband service bundled with other services like 

video, phone, and wireless service, and use of your own 

equipment.

https://www.example.com/discounts

Additional Charges & Terms

Provider Monthly Fees

One-Time Purchase Fees 

Early Termination Fee 

Government Taxes 

Fee description $00.00

Fee description 

Fee description 

Fee description 

$00.00

$00.00

$00.00

Fee description 

Fee description 

$00.00

$00.00

Included/Varies by Location/$00.00

$00.00

Monthly Price

This monthly price is an introductory rate 

Time the introductory rate applies

Monthly price after the introductory rate

Length of contract 

Link to Terms of Contract 

$00.00

YY months

$00.00

YY months

https://www.example.com/terms-of-contract

Yes / No

Broadband Facts

Provider Name

Service Plan Name and/or Speed Tier 

[Fixed or Mobile] Broadband Consumer Disclosure

Speeds Provided with Plan

Typical Download Speed 

Charges for Additional Data Usage

Data Included with Monthly Price

Typical Upload Speed

Typical Latency 

Mbps

Mbps

ms

$/GB

GB

000

000

00

000

https://www.example.com/data-usage

Network Management Policy 

Customer Support 

Learn about the terms used on this label. Visit the Federal 

Communications Commission’s Consumer Resource Center.

Phone:

Website:

Unique Plan Identifier: F0005937974123ABC456EMC789

Privacy Policy

(555) 555-5555

https://www.example.com/privacy

https://www.example.com/network-management

https://www.example.com

fcc.gov/consumer
# L_2021065DE.01008701.xml

| 25.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 65/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 65/87

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2017/2177 der Kommission vom 22. November 2017 über den Zugang zu Serviceeinrichtungen und schienenverkehrsbezogenen Leistungen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 307 vom 23. November 2017
  )

Seite 4, Artikel 2 Absatz 1 Unterabsatz 1:

Anstatt:

„Die Betreiber der in Absatz 2 genannten Serviceeinrichtungen können beantragen, von der Anwendung aller oder bestimmter Vorschriften dieser Verordnung, mit Ausnahme von Artikel 4 Absatz 2 Buchstaben a bis d und Buchstabe m sowie Absatz 5, ausgenommen zu werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Betreiber der in Absatz 2 genannten Serviceeinrichtungen können beantragen, von der Anwendung aller oder bestimmter Vorschriften dieser Verordnung, mit Ausnahme von Artikel 4 Absatz 2 Buchstaben a bis d und Buchstabe m sowie Artikel 5, ausgenommen zu werden.“

---
Owen D. DENSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0443

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2018122EN.01003502.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 122/35 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/390 of 11 November 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on certain prudential requirements for central securities depositories and designated credit institutions offering banking-type ancillary services

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 65 of 10 March 2017](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2017_065_R_TOC)
)

On page 17, Article 6(1)(a)(iii):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(iii) | the expected net income after tax for the most past financial year where audited results are not yet available;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(iii) | the expected net income after tax for the previous financial year where audited results are not yet available;’; |

on page 32, Article 26(1):

for:

‘1.   A CSD-banking service provider shall have effective reimbursement procedures of intraday credit, which comply with the requirements in paragraphs 2 and 3.’,

read:

‘1.   A CSD-banking service provider shall have effective reimbursement procedures of intraday credit, which comply with the requirements in paragraph 2.’.

---
Isabel DEL PINO ALLEN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1243

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

November 14 , 2019.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00106

- CV

IN RE DEAN E. SMITH , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 257th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 33707



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 7, 2019, relator Dean E. Smith filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Sandra Peake, presiding judge of the 257th District Court of Harris County , to vacate a June 1, 2018
enforcement order

.2

The order was signed by the Honorable Judy Warne , who is no longer a sitting judge. On February 21, 2019, we abated this original proceeding to allow Judge Peake an opportunity reconsider the enforcement order and to advise this court of the action taken on relator’s request. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b) (stating that, in a n original proceeding “the court must abate the proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision”).
On October 29, 2019, Judge Peake advised this court that she withdrew the June 1, 2019 order and granted a new trial

. On Nov ember 7, 2019, relator filed a motion dismiss in light of Judge Peake’s withdrawal of the June 1, 2019 order and grant of a new trial. Relator’s request for mandamus relief is now moot. Relator’s
motion to dismiss is GRANTED

. Accordingly, we order relator’s petition for writ of mandamus dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
ex10-7.htm


    
      Exhibit
10.7

    

    
 

    FIFTH
AMENDMENT TO

    EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Fifth Amendment”) is made effective as of the 1st
day of January, 2009, by and between OLD LINE BANK, a Maryland-chartered
commercial bank (the “Bank” or “Employer”) and JOSEPH BURNETT (the
“Employee”).  This Fifth Amendment amends in certain respects that
certain Executive Employment Agreement dated March 31, 2003, between the Bank
and Employee, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Executive Employment
Agreement dated December 31, 2004, the Second Amendment to Employment Agreement
dated as of December 30, 2005, the Third Amendment to Employment Agreement dated
as of January 1, 2007, and the Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as
of January 1, 2008 (collectively the “Original Agreement”).

     

    1.           Capitalized
Terms.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Original
Agreement.

     

     

    2.           Amendments.  The
Original Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of Section
3(A) in its entirety and replacing said section with the following:

     

    


    “The
Employee’s salary under this Agreement shall be $172,300 per annum, payable on a
bi-weekly basis.”

     

    All of
the provisions of the Original Agreement are incorporated herein by reference
and shall remain and continue in full force and effect as amended by this Fifth
Amendment.

     

    


    3.           Counterparts.  This
Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
considered an original for all purposes but all of which shall together
constitute one and the same instrument.

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    
 

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have duly executed this Fifth Amendment, under seal, as of January 31, 2009,
effective as of January 1, 2009.

    


    
      	
              WITNESS/ATTEST:

            	
              OLD
      LINE BANK.

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              /s/ Christine M.
      Rush

            	
              By:   /s/ Charles A. Bongar,
      Jr.

            	
               (SEAL)

            
	 
      	
              Name:
      Charles A. Bongar, Jr.

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Title:
      Chairman of Compensation Committee

            	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              WITNESS:

            	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              /s/ Christine M.
      Rush

            	
              /s/ Joseph
      Burnett

            	
              (SEAL)

            
	 
      	
              JOSEPH
      BURNETT