alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES L. STEVENSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

LISA PRATT, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00336-SI 

JUDGMENT

Judgment is entered against plaintiff and in defendants’ favor.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated: February 14, 2019

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge
STATE of Louisiana v. Cokey J. LISTI

NO. 2019-KK-0713

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by the trial court judge.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

s0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

137151 & (19) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137151 

 COA: 284785 

Kalamazoo CC: 97-000230-FC 

WILLIAM HALL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion to remand is 

DENIED.
Eugene BARNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-1055

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT

    


    Between
Universal Infotainment Systems Corporation (“Employer”), and Mr. Dimitrios
Ioannidis (“Employee”).

    


    THIS
AGREEMENT made as of this 18th day of
December, 2008 (the “Agreement”), by and between Universal Infotainment Systems
Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“Employer,” or “The Company”), and Mr.
Dimitrios Ioannidis (“Employee”) is an amendment to the Employment Agreement
dated the 2nd day of
May, 2008.

    


    The
following is mutually agreed upon by the Employer and the Employee on this
18th
day of December, 2008:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              Deferment
      of Effective Date of Employment
Agreement

            


    

    The Employer and the
Employee mutually agree to defer the effective date of cash compensation,
but not stock compensation which shall be paid the date the Employment Agreement
was signed, under the Employment Agreement dated the 2nd day of
May, 2008. Cash compensation will be deferred until such time at which The
Company is a publically traded entity and has secured a financial threshold of
no less than $4,000,000 in available financial capital.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of this 18th day of
December, 2008.

    


    
      
        
          
            
              
                	
                        Employer

                      
	
                        Universal
      Infotainment Systems Corporation

                      
	 
      
	 
      
	
                        By:

                      	/s/
      Emanuel
      G. Pavlopoulos
	
                        Emanuel
      G. Pavlopoulos

                      
	
                        Chairman

                      
	 
      
	 
      
	
                        Employee

                      
	 
      
	     
      /s/ Dimitrios Ioannidis
	
                        Mr.
      Dimitrios Ioannidis

                      
	
                        Executive
      Vice President
EU

                      


              

            

          

        

      

    

    


    
      	
              Page
      1 of 1

            	
              Amendment
      to Employment Agreement

            	
              Dimitrios
      Ioannidis
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advanc e sheets, it may be cited as State v. Johnson , Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3023.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to f ormal revision before it is pu blished in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are reques ted to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohi o, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O
. 2020-O HIO -3023
T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v . J OHNSON , A PPELLANT
. [Until this opinion appears in t he Ohio Official Reports advanc e sheets, it may be cited as State v. Johnson , Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3023.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Dangler

. (No. 2019-0119―Submitted May 13, 2020―Decided May 26, 2020.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 106322, 2018-Ohio-5029.

_________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appe als is affirmed on the authori ty of State v. Dangler , __ Ohio St.3d __, 2020-Ohio-2765, __ N.E.3d __.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and K ENNEDY , F RENCH , F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , and S TEWART , JJ., concur.

_________________ Russell S. Bensing, for appellant, Maurice Johnson.

_________________
PLAINTIFF FTC’S JAN. 4, 2019 LIST OF 

AFTERNOON WITNESSES

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jennifer Milici, D.C. Bar No. 987096

Joseph R. Baker, D.C. Bar No. 490802

Elizabeth A. Gillen, Cal. Bar No. 260667

Nathaniel M. Hopkin, New York Bar No. 5191598

Daniel Matheson, D.C. Bar No. 502490

Mark J. Woodward, D.C. Bar No. 479537

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

(202) 326-2912; (202) 326-3496 (fax)

jmilici@ftc.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE 

COMMISSION’S LIST OF 

AFTERNOON WITNESSES FOR 

TRIAL DAY 1, JANUARY 4, 2019

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1109 Filed 01/04/19 Page 1 of 2
1

PLAINTIFF FTC’S JAN. 4, 2019 LIST OF 

AFTERNOON WITNESSES

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to the Court’s January 4, 2019 Order (ECF No. 1108), the Federal Trade 

Commission (“FTC”) submits the following list of witnesses it intends to call live and by 

videotaped deposition on the afternoon of January 4, 2019 (Trial Day 1).

1. Ira Blumberg, Lenovo (by videotaped deposition) (continued)

2. Paul Jacobs, Qualcomm (by videotaped deposition)

3. David Wise, Qualcomm (live)

4. Nanfen (Nancy) Yu, Huawei (by videotaped deposition)

5. John Grubbs, Blackberry (by videotaped deposition) (time permitting)

Dated: January 4, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

/s/ Daniel Matheson 

Jennifer Milici

Joseph R. Baker

Elizabeth A. Gillen

Nathaniel M. Hopkin

Daniel Matheson

Mark J. Woodward

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

(202) 326-2912; (202) 326-3496 (fax)

jmilici@ftc.gov

Attorneys for Federal Trade Commission

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1109 Filed 01/04/19 Page 2 of 2
# L_2018122EN.01003601.xml

| 17.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 122/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 122/36

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/391 of 11 November 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards further specifying the content of the reporting on internalised settlements

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 65 of 10 March 2017
  )

On page 44, in recital 6:

for:

‘ESMA has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2).’,

read:

‘ESMA has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2).’.

---
Exhibit 4.1

                            REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT
                               FOR FOREX365, INC.

THIS REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of
January 9, 2009, by and among Vero Management, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
liability company (the "Lender") and Forex365, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Borrower").

WHEREAS, on January 9, 2009, the Borrower's Board of Directors approved certain
advances to be made from the Lender to the Borrower to provide the Borrower with
funds for working capital.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:


          1. The Lender agrees to make advances to the Borrower from time to
time at the request of the Borrower. The advances outstanding shall not exceed
$14,000.

          2. The Borrower shall repay the outstanding advances from time to
time, in whole or in part. All advances outstanding shall be due and payable in
full on the earlier of: (i) June 30, 2009, or (ii) the occurrence of a change of
control of the Borrower.

          3. The outstanding advances shall bear interest at a rate of 6% per
annum commencing July 1, 2009.

          4. The parties hereto shall maintain a schedule of advances and
payments hereunder which is attached hereto.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.


                                       FOREX365, INC.




                                   By: /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kevin R. Keating, Chief Executive Officer


                                       VERO MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.



                                   By: /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kevin R. Keating, Manager
G.G.S. v. STATE

CR-16-0757

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 6, 2017

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Brenda G. Gujral, president of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 14, 2009By:/s/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 30, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 23, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1318 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1145, K2025-1145.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-01910 Filed 1-29-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
MARTHA and HARRY JONES, Appellants, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications  STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vision Industries Corp. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vision Industries Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2010. The undersigned certifies that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vision Industries Corp. as of December 31, 2010. This Certification is executed as of March 29, 2011. By:/s/ MARTIN SCHUERMANNMartin Schuermann
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Treasurer 
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vision Industries Corp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
David Jacobs BARROW v. STATE

CR-16-1021

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 112 

To provide for the printing of the Senate Manual for the One Hundred 

Seventeenth Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To provide for the printing of the Senate Manual for the 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, That a revised edition of the Senate Manual 

2 for the One Hundred Seventeenth Congress be prepared 

3 by the Committee on Rules and Administration and print4 ed as a Senate document, and that fifteen hundred addi5 tional copies shall be printed and bound for the use of 

6 the Senate, bound and delivered as may be directed by 

7 the Committee on Rules and Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Claire Hornbuckle CLEMENTS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. J. Warren HUGHES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\WHAALL\2016civ\16-07213 Maquet\YANotice(MTD&Stay).wpd

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC., and ALBERT

CHIN,

Defendants. /

No. C 16-07213 WHA

NOTICE RE OPPORTUNITIES

FOR YOUNG ATTORNEYS

Counsel will please keep in mind the need to provide arguments and courtroom

experience to the next generation of practitioners. The Court will particularly welcome any

lawyer with four or fewer years of experience to argue the upcoming motions.

Dated: May 9, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Civil Minutes

Date: November 8, 2018 Judge: Hon. James Donato

Time: 26 Minutes

Case No. C-17-00039-JD

Case Name Federal Trade Commission v. D-Link Corporation et al

Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s): Jarad Brown/Kevin Moriarty

Attorney(s) for Defendant(s): Brock S. Weber/S.J. Christine Yang/Michael Pepson/John J. 

Vecchione

Deputy Clerk: Lisa R. Clark Court Reporter: Kathy Sullivan

PROCEEDINGS

Discovery Hearing - Held

NOTES AND ORDERS

The FTC agrees not to argue an omissions claim at trial. D-Link Systems’ discovery letter, Dkt. 

No. 163, is denied in all other respects.

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 225 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 1
B.O.A., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o S.N.H., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4516

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jeffrey ERTLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORD. CONT. & EXCL. TIME UNDER S.T.A.

CR 17-043 WHA 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973) 

United States Attorney

BARBARA J. VALLIERE (DCBN 439353) 

Chief, Criminal Division

KATHERINE L. WAWRZYNIAK (CABN 252751) 

Assistant United States Attorney 

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 

San Francisco, California 94102-3495 

Telephone: (415) 436-7317 

FAX: (415) 436-7234 

katherine.wawrzyniak@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DANTE ALAPATI SAGOTE, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 17-043 WHA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING MATTER AND 

EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE 

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

Date: February 14, 2017 to April 11, 2017 

Time: 2:00 p.m. 

The parties appeared before the Honorable William Alsup on February 14, 2017, for an initial 

status conference. Defense counsel explained that the government is continuing to produce discovery 

and that the case has some cross-over with two other firearms cases prosecuted in this district in 2016. 

Defense counsel represented that he needs additional time to assess the case. Therefore, the parties 

requested, and the Court granted, a continuance until April 11, 2017. The parties also stipulated, and the 

Court ordered, that time between February 14, 2017 and April 11, 2017, be excluded for effective 

preparation of counsel pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). 

//

//
STIP. AND PROPOSED ORD. CONT. & EXCL. TIME UNDER S.T.A.

CR 17-043 WHA 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The parties further stipulate, and ask the Court to find, that the requested continuance and 

exclusion of time are in the interests of justice and outweigh the best interest of the public and the 

defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). 

SO STIPULATED.

DATED: February 16, 2017 BRIAN J. STRETCH

 United States Attorney

 

 /s/ 

KATHERINE L. WAWRZYNIAK

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: February 16, 2017 /s/ 

MARK R. VERMEULEN

Counsel for Defendant Dante Alapati Sagote

For the reasons stated, this matter is continued until April 11, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. The time 

between February 14, 2017 and April 11, 2017, is excluded from the running of the speedy trial clock 

for effective preparation of counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Failure to grant the 

continuance would deny the defendant’s counsel the reasonable time necessary to prepare, taking into 

account the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________________ 

HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP

United States District Judge

Attestation of Filer

 In addition to myself, the other signatory to this document is Mark R. Vermeulen. I attest that I 

have his permission to enter a conformed signature on his behalf and to file the document. 

DATED: February 16, 2017 /s/ 

 KATHERINE L. WAWRZYNIAK

Assistant United States Attorney 

April 13, 2017.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE AND ORDERING 

QUALCOMM RESPONSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE AND 

ORDERING QUALCOMM RESPONSE

Re: Dkt. No. 526

The Administrative Motion of Lawyers for Civil Justice to File Brief as Amicus Curiae is 

GRANTED. Qualcomm shall file a response by February 7, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 2, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 532 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 1