alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:16-cv-07014-VC

OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED TERMINAL, LLC’S STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602) 

 bobfeldman@quinnemanuel.com 

 David Myre (Bar No. 304600) 

 davidmyre@quinnemanuel.com 

 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 

Telephone: (650) 801-5000 

Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

 Meredith M. Shaw (Bar No. 284089) 

 meredithshaw@quinnemanuel.com 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 875-6600 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED TERMINAL, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED 

TERMINAL, LLC 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF OAKLAND, 

Defendant. 

 Case No. 3:16-cv-07014-VC 

PLAINTIFF OAKLAND BULK & 

OVERSIZED TERMINAL, LLC’S 

STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION 

Case 3:16-cv-07014-VC Document 273 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1- Case No. 3:16-cv-07014-VC

 OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED TERMINAL, LLC’S STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION

On October 4, 2018, Defendant City of Oakland filed a Motion for Waiver of Bond 

Requirement for Stay of Judgment of Costs on Appeal. (D.E. 272.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 

7-3(b), Plaintiff Oakland Bulk & Oversize Terminal, LLC respectfully submits this Statement of 

Nonopposition, as Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant’s Motion for Waiver of Bond Requirement 

for Stay of Judgment of Costs on Appeal. 

Dated: October 18, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 

By: /s/ Robert Feldman 

 Robert P. Feldman 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 3:16-cv-07014-VC Document 273 Filed 10/18/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S
Security Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 14, 2008



/s/ Ronald G. FarrellRonald G. Farrell,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S
Security Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 26, 2006



/s/ Ronald G. FarrellRonald G. Farrell,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State 

v. Johnson, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3023.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2020-OHIO-3023

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. JOHNSON, APPELLANT.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Johnson, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3023.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Dangler. 

(No. 2019-0119―Submitted May 13, 2020―Decided May 26, 2020.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, 

No. 106322, 2018-Ohio-5029. 

_________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of 

State v. Dangler, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2020-Ohio-2765, __ N.E.3d __. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, 

and STEWART, JJ., concur. 

_________________ 

Russell S. Bensing, for appellant, Maurice Johnson. 

_________________
Mark Anthony JEWELL v. STATE

CR-16-1341

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eclipse  Entertainment  Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Art
Birzneck, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ ART BIRZNECK
-------------------------------------------
Art Birzneck, President, Director
# L_2017255EN.01003201.xml

| 3.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 255/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 255/32

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/220 of 8 February 2017 amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India following a partial interim review under Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 34 of 9 February 2017
  )

On page 28, Article 1, second last row in table, second column ‘Duty ( %)’:

for:

‘8,4’,

read:

‘5,0’.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

Power of Attorney of Stephen G. Franklin, Sr.



STATE OF GEORGIA

COUNTY OF COBB


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Stephen G. Franklin, Sr., a Director
     of EDUTREK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia corporation, do constitute
     and appoint Steve Bostic and Donald J. Blankers, jointly and severally,
     my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of
     substitution and resubstitution, for me in any and all capacities, to
     sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for EDUTREK INTERNATIONAL, INC. for
     the fiscal year ended May 31, 1998, pursuant to the requirements of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
     and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf
     and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said
     Annual Report, incorporating such changes as any of the said
     attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming
     all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or
     substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 26th day of
August 1998.


                                            /s/   Stephen G. Franklin, Sr.
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Stephen G. Franklin, Sr.




                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                 --------------

BEFORE me this 26th day of August 1998, came Stephen G. Franklin, Sr.,
       personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above
       and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true
       act and deed.


                                            /s/ Cynthia Gardere
                                            -------------------
                                            NOTARY PUBLIC


                                            State of Georgia
                                                     -------
                                            My Commission Expires:

                                            September 11, 1999
                                            ------------------
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART FIH MOBILE AND HON HAI PRECISION 

INDUSTRY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART FIH MOBILE AND 

HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY'S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1437

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on FIH Mobile and Hon Hai 

Precision Industry’s motion to seal, ECF No. 1437, as follows.

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

CX4401 Foxconn_0000175068 to 

Foxconn_0000175069

DENIED as to Skiver Comment 

on page Foxconn_0000175069. 

GRANTED otherwise.

CX4401 Foxconn_0000175071 to 

Foxconn_0000175072

GRANTED.

CX4401 Foxconn_0000175075 to 

Foxconn_0000175076

GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1444 Filed 01/25/19 Page 1 of 1
EXIHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zylorain, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.



February 14, 2005                       /S/ William F. Webster
                                        ----------------------
                                            William F. Webster,
                                            President and CEO, and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 21 (Monday, February 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02112]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE637]

South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
host a Best Fishing Practices Outreach Evaluation Workshop (Workshop) 
on February 20 and 21, 2025.

DATES: The Workshop will be held from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m., EDT on 
February 20, 2025 and from 9 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. on February 21, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: 
    Meeting address: The Workshop will be held at the Hampton Inn & 
Suites Charleston, Airport, 3020 W Montague Avenue, North Charleston, 
SC 29418; phone: (843) 990-5100.
    The presentation and breakout group report-out sessions will also 
be available via webinar. Registration is required. Webinar 
registration, an online public comment form, and briefing book 
materials will be available two weeks prior to the meetings at https://safmc.net/workgroups/.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Wiegand, Fishery Social 
Scientist, SAFMC; phone: (843) 302-8437 or toll free: (866) SAFMC-10; 
fax: (843) 769-4520; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The South Atlantic Council's Best Fishing 
Practices (BFP) Outreach Initiative was expanded in December 2022. 
Evaluation of the outreach efforts conducted is key in ensuring that 
the goal of increasing the use of BFP in the South Atlantic snapper 
grouper fishery is achieved. Fortunately, in recent years, there has 
become increased interest in exploring stakeholder perception and usage 
of BFP, namely barotrauma mitigation tools like descending devices. 
This workshop will explore the relationship between perceptions, norms, 
and the use of best practices, the effectiveness of best fishing 
practices outreach and education efforts, and how evaluation efforts 
can be used to support science and management processes.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the 
Council office (see ADDRESSES) 5 days prior to the meeting.

    Note: The times and sequence specified in this agenda are 
subject to change.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 29, 2025.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-02112 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7502

JAIME REYES SOTO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SIDNEY HARKLEROAD, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-03-1122-1)

Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 17, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaime Reyes Soto, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jaime Reyes Soto seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Soto has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
!"#!$%&"'#()%*&" +',!- 




/	0



 /	0
12
 	1		 
3	
.	1456 789 3	
.0
12
 	
.1		 
1	:	 
	;
1	1<	0	2 		1 =	1


 
	
0

>

?
0 	1
 <	@2	A BCDEFGHIJK
 K	0

K L	0

K
1	

K@

K 85M7N/O/P74Q>MP7965M9/8QR4O9QNP9

T	>M89PQ9S4Q5M7NUPQM7NT	

V
	
0
WOR45XOM7948Q/86 9QM5O7R648YQ5M7ZS4R97/8QR4O9Q7[PQ96<5M7N/9Q\[P/894X/86 ]47X9O>

/ 
	
:
0 
	
: 3 
1	^_`abcd!) "%&)($ 

e%'f,(#)f!" *ghdi' +i,! #*)&$ "$j R @
.0SMQ8 O7]48

	 T: 489/]Q .0

Y1

0
 57[PQ948Y]Q9S/85P]S/748Y< QOR45XOM7948YZ498QM794N

0

N/4]

k	

N/4]

0	
 

N/4]

	 

Z3


	
.

L6/X

L/X k0 

?L6/X

L	. 	.

l96/

   m m m m m m m m m m m    m m m m m m m m m m m    m m m m m m m m m m m    m m m m m m m m m m m    m m m m m m m m m m m    m m m m m m m m m m m 	 	11<
<W<> 
\
	\ 2XQ4Y8 3]MZ<R7945XS/Z4]O/X ]RS/7YQ6OMQ49O]PQ/649M8/] 	:	


nopqrostuv wxyz{|}~{ opqo

votvovqs wxyz|~ votvo

qsvtut qs sov{xusuqutq|ovuq ¡|

¢q£so¤ £q uuv¥o¦v ~n

q~¡vqstu£q

§

 ̈{ n ¤suo ©

©

a

¤sovu«tsotsuo£pqvu o{

 ̈votvovqs  ̈|

 qos¢

oqvq¢

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1091 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 2


	

    ! ! "
 # !$"%!$ 
& 
" !$ !"





 !$!    &'(  ! 



 !$!    &! (! ! "  



 !$)*
+! !,  & !$ ,&  



 -*$
. &/-0,
 1	$ ! "2	'*!2	 !!(

)&  %$*$ !,  &! &!	$$' 
& 
" ! 

&( ! "($



 3% &! '($  ,&   $,!$!, &! '

! !!% &! '($'"(4  !


5
 $!,(% $, !&  &! '  !%&670%

0$8&' 9: %  ! ',
."% !&'


;
 <! 
,"($'& 2,"($'& ,&


)* )$% =%!$!  !!'$ " !
)$( % & 

!$" % ,
)$'% =%! ,  %, 

)*5
:$,  &','$!


);
 > 
& 
" !& " &! (!  ! "! "(

  
)&'$%   &!&!( "($


)
  4!$:
*!$ $:
 $
 1 &! $,&6" ! ?&' !

 @ABCDEFGFHID@J


)K
 L! 	! "(  !?&
 !$,!! ",' % !

( $! "
M,!%N '$,(,!! "(%& M%NM "%NM/
N

)K'
 .$   !
< $ "  
> 
& 
" !$


-0('   $&3 "(  


)K 
 < ;   	 !& !! &'
 10&$! ,' "

 !$(?&
03!$%3!  ! !$ $(; $

*,OIP@QDR(&$' "


S T $ ,
S T $ ,
S T; $ ,
S T $ ,S TUVWXYZ[\]^V_`Zabc\]d`YVc ebZV`a\WVdbZY[eV_`fcebgV_`cZebfVWXYZ[aV`ZY[Xebc `VZcY\g_Wh

S TXYc(	&


S T& %&  !& ', $! ',!& $'$$  

d`Vgb]YZ[iV`Yaab]Y\cbWhfV XYZ[\]^V_`Zabcj

) 
 ."  !  ,,&($!, $ "	!!$&, $ "
$   	"& !

)
 - "    




Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1091 Filed 01/03/19 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert N. Tenczar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MMI Products, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

1. all significant deficiencies and materially weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.



|Date:   April 2, 2004 | By:   /s/Robert N. Tenczar                                   
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Robert N. Tenczar, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer