alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 1145 V

Filed: April 27 , 201 5

N ot for Publication

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CANDACE JOHNSON *

*

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Tetanus Diphtheria Acellular Pertussis

v. * (“Tdap ” ) ; Shoulder Injury Related to

* Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) ;

* Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Paul R. Brazil , Philadelphia, PA

, for petitioner.

Alexis B. Babcock , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Vowell

, Chief Special Master:

On November 24 , 2014

, Candace Johnson filed a petition for compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et

seq

, 2 [ the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that as a result of a Te tanus

diphtheria and acellular pertussis (“ Tdap ”) vaccination on February 25, 2014

, petitioner

suffered a “shoulder injury related to vaccine administration.” Petition at 1

. The case

was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 27, 2015 , respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Respondent’s Report”],

in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, it will be

posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501

note (2006)) . In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), pe titioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2 006).Respondent’s Report at 3 . Specifically, respondent submits that “ Ms. Johnson suffered

a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration, a non

- Table injury, and that

preponderance of the medi cal evidence indicates that th e injury was caus ally related to

the vaccination. Therefore, compensation is appropriate

. ” Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that

petitioner is entitle d to compensation

.

s/Denise K. Vowe ll

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master
Roberto KASINSKY, Appellant, v. Richard John DIAZ and Richard J. Diaz, P.A., Appellees.

No. 3D18-547

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 24.4

Power of Attorney of Ronald P. Hogan



STATE OF GEORGIA

COUNTY OF FAYETTE


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Ronald P. Hogan, a Director of EDUTREK
INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia corporation, do constitute and appoint Steve
Bostic and Daniel D. Moore, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-
in-fact, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for me in any
and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for EDUTREK
INTERNATIONAL, INC. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
incorporating such changes as any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems
appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-
fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 15th day of
March 1999.



                             /s/ Ronald P. Hogan
                             --------------------
                             Ronald P. Hogan



                                ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                --------------

BEFORE me this 15th day of March 1999, came Ronald P. Hogan, personally known to
me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of
Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                             /s/ Janice Wallace
                             -------------------
                             NOTARY PUBLIC


                             State of Georgia
                                      -------

                             My Commission Expires:

                             May 29, 2000
                             ------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00223-CV

Ramiro ESPINOZA and Jeanette Espinoza,

Appellants

v.

Jesse FLORES,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CV05800

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed by June 12, 2023. Neither the brief nor a 

motion for extension of time was filed. By order dated June 22, 2023, appellant was ordered to 

file her brief and to show cause in writing by July 3, 2023, why this appeal should not be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant did not respond to this court’s order, 

and, to date, appellant has not filed a brief. Because appellant failed to timely file a brief in this 

appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
# L_2018169DE.01005601.xml

| 6.7.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 169/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 169/56

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses (EU) 2018/254 des Rates vom 15. Februar 2018 über den Abschluss — im Namen der Europäischen Union — des Vertrags von Marrakesch zur Erleichterung des Zugangs blinder, sehbehinderter oder anderweitig lesebehinderter Personen zu veröffentlichten Werken

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 48 vom 21. Februar 2018
  )

Seite 2, Artikel 2 Absatz 2:

Anstatt:

„Die Hinterlegung erfolgt am 12. Juli 2018.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Hinterlegung erfolgt ab dem 12. Juli 2018.“

---
-----------

--------

Case 3:17-cv-00272-JST Document 15 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 3
--------

Case 3:17-cv-00272-JST Document 15 Filed 02/07/17 Page 2 of 3
-------- 6

Case 3:17-cv-00272-JST Document 15 Filed 02/07/17 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantair, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Steven Santo, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
February 13, 2009





/s/ Steven
      SantoName:
                      Steven
      SantoTitle:
                      Chief
      Executive
Officer
Hon. Ii&r .D&m, .JrJr, 

Coun?y Attorne 

Jid Wells Couu e J 

Alice, Texas - 

bpixlfon Ho0 v-649 

AttsntWiat Bon. 

Parker Bllsey 

,Ro I .Assrs&nt of costs, 

a$tw placing an adult 

~dofamlant au probation 

in 0 salary county, 

Dear Sir: : 

we refer to Jrour letters in which you ask 

if costs should be assesred against a defendant who 

has been placed on probatfon after tionvfctfon in a 

criminal case fn a salary Couut~$. You have not re- 

- - ferrea us to any authority which distfnguafshes ,beWeen fee countLeg tid.silarf countf&s concernfng 

liability. of a convicted defo&ant for o6sts in a 

~criminol case and we haw fOUZ&noWi Therefore this 

opfnion applies to both such., oounties, 

S&ctlon 31 of Artfcle 781b, V&rnonDs Code 

of, Criminal. Procedure p readsr 

“For the purpesr of ,detenining .when 

fees are to be paid-to pay officer or office, 

the placfng .of th,e defez@ant on probation 

tihall~be considered .a,flual ditiposftfon of 

that,case, with+ the n~osslty oft waiting 

for the’ termination of the period of proba, 

tfon ,or ‘su~spension Of 8eutencera 

.The lauguage. ‘ftir the purpebe of de$errining when’ fees are to be paid to any ,offfcer or offfcen 

makes plain that ,a11 such fees becore due and payable 

at the t.ire the defendant fs placed on probation so 

that procass map issue therefor, Language that is 

plain Is not subject to constpuctioii. The ,assessrent 

and collection of costs fs’not affected by placing- the 

defendant on probitfon. 
Hen. Homer Dean, Jr. - Page 2 (V-&1 

sec. 3.l of &%a 781by v. c. co r, 

vi%es that the febs are te be ?ail te t IF 

officers at the time the defendant IS placrl 

en probation even though the case be trfe% 

in a salary county, 

Yeurs very truly,. 

ATTOBl’iEY O=lUL OF TSXA8 

WTW rwb Assistant
CX0599 

REVISED REDACTED VERSION 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1313-1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 3
CX0599-001 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL- ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1313-1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1313-1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 31 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 31

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
    military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of certain defense 
                               articles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2021

    Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Sanders, and Mr. Lee) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
    military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of certain defense 
                               articles.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles, described 
        in Transmittal No. 20-11, submitted to Congress pursuant to 
        section 36(b) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2776(b)) and published in the Congressional Record on November 
        15, 2021: Two hundred eighty (280) AIM-120C-7/C-8 Advanced 
        Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM); five hundred ninety-
        six (596) LAU-128 Missile Rail Launchers (MRL); containers; 
        weapon support and support equipment; spare and repair parts; 
        United States Government and contractor engineering, technical, 
        and logistical support services; and other related elements of 
        logistical and program support.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Edward M. Jamison and Patrick Hartman each hereby certify as follows:



| | 1. | They are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Community Bancorp, a Nevada Corporation (the Company).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on their knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
(the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands
hereto as of this 4 day of May, 2007.



/s/ EDWARD M. JAMISONEdward M. Jamison President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ PATRICK HARTMANPatrick Hartman Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
Form of Waiver of Senior Executive Officers


 Exhibit 10.2 
 FORM OF WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s
participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to
comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I acknowledge that this
regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I
participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I
would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship. 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Waiver. 
 Date January 16, 2009
**Exhibit 31.1****Certifications**          I, Jerome J. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of First Business Financial Services, Inc.,certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Business Financial Services,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(c)and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.            /s/ Jerome J. Smith         Jerome J. Smith    Chief Executive Officer         May 2, 2006  
32
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BETTY J. MURPHY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-89-280, CA-01-858-1) Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: April 1, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Betty J. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Betty Jean Murphy appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for modification of her term of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Murphy , Nos. CR-89-280; CA01-858-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Antonio Maurice SMITH v. STATE

CR-16-1167

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Number333-157494on Form S-3 of our report dated March 14, 2011 relating to the financial statements of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the effectiveness of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP’s internal control over financial reporting dated March 14, 2011, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ SPICER JEFFRIES LLP





Greenwood Village, Colorado


March 14, 2011
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-118983, 333-44462, 333-44756,333-60138 and 333-60136) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1995 Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Option Plan, 2000 CEO Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, 2001 UK Employee Stock PurchasePlan and the UK company Share Option Plan of Pharsight Corporation of our report dated April 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pharsight Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended March 31, 2005. 

 

San Jose, California 

June 27, 2005 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Joe C. MACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1931

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Marcus ANDERSON and Blue Oasis, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. SPACE PLAYHOUSE, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Ashley Gonzalez TUNSTALL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. A. Gordon TUNSTALL, III, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3897

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Writ of certiorari is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S
Security Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 14, 2007



/s/ Ronald G. FarrellRonald G. Farrell,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Marcial H. RIVERA, Appellant, v. EVERBANK; Olga Rivera; et al., Appellees.

No. 1D18-3431

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.