alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         1040581
<NAME>                        UDS Capital I
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                     206,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   206,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                      200,000
<COMMON>                                           6,200
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     206,200
<SALES>                                            8,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   8,800
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    8,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                8,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       8,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00
        

</TABLE>
Luis GOMEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1147

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Eugene F. Zenobi, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Philip L. Reizenstein, Chief Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, SCALES, and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, J.

In this direct appeal, appellant Luis Alberto Gomez claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel. "Because appellant's claims are not apparent on the face of the record, they must be addressed by motion for post-conviction relief." *Latson v. State*, 193 So.3d 1070, 1071 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), *citing* *Beazley v. State*, 148 So.3d 552, 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) ("Generally, a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may not be raised on direct appeal."); *see also* *Aversano v. State*, 966 So.2d 493, 494-95 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("With rare exceptions, ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be raised in a motion for post-conviction relief because they are generally fact-specific."); *Corzo v. State*, 806 So.2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (ineffective assistance of counsel claims may be considered on direct appeal only "when the ineffectiveness is obvious on the face of the appellate record, the prejudice caused by the conduct is indisputable, and a tactical explanation of the conduct is inconceivable.").

Appellant further asserts that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to conduct a *Nelson* 1 inquiry prior to proceeding to trial. After carefully reviewing the record, "we conclude that the trial court conducted a proper and adequate inquiry before finding that [a]ppellant lacked good cause to discharge court-appointed counsel under *Nelson*." *Miller v. State*, 764 So.2d 640, 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

With regard to the remaining claims of error, as trial counsel made no specific and contemporaneous objections and the asserted errors "did not permeate or saturate the trial with such basic invalidity as to lead to a reversal regardless of a timely objection," we conclude that affirmance is warranted. *Brown v. State*, 124 So.2d 481, 484 (Fla. 1960) (articulating the standard for fundamental error); *see* *also* *Steinhorst v. State*, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla. 1982) ("Furthermore, in order for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as legal ground for the objection, exception, or motion below.").

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm appellant's convictions and sentences.

Affirmed.

*Nelson v. State*, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
EXHIBIT D 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 45-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 45-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 45-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 45-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 45-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 45-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

The undersigned Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Marquee Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



Dated: February 13, 2009/s/ PETER C. BROWN Peter C. Brown Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer, Director and President/s/ CRAIG R. RAMSEY Craig R. Ramsey Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Marquee
Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

53

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                       972
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         485,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 487,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                     300,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   487,220
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,452
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,043
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,313
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO

WJ COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This Second
Amendment to the WJ Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan, as amended (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), is made pursuant to Section 10
of the Stock Incentive Plan.


 


The section of
the Stock Incentive Plan, titled “Section 2. Administration,” is hereby amended
to add the following paragraph to the end thereof:


 


“If the Company is a “publicly held corporation” within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Code (“162(m)”), the Board may establish a Committee of
“outside directors” within the meaning of 162(m) to approve the grant of any
option which might reasonably be anticipated to result in the payment of
employee remuneration deductible for income tax purposes pursuant to
162(m).  Such Committee shall ensure that at any such time the Company meets the
definition of a “publicly held corporation” under Section 162(m), no employee
or prospective employee shall be granted one or more options within any fiscal
year of the Company which in the aggregate are for the purchase of more than
3,000,000 shares (the “162(m) Grant Limit”), subject to the adjustment
provisions set forth in Section 3 below. 
An option which is canceled in the same fiscal year of the Company in
which it was granted shall continue to be counted against the 162(m) Grant
Limit for such period.”


 


The final paragraph of the section of the Stock Incentive Plan titled
“Section 3. Common Stock Subject To Plan” is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety and shall read as follows:


 


“In the event of any merger, reorganization, consolidation,
recapitalization, spinoff, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split,
extraordinary distribution with respect to the Common Stock or other change in
corporate structure affecting the Common Stock, the Committee or the Board may
make such substitution or adjustment in the aggregate number and kind of shares
or other property subject to the 162(m) Grant Limit, in the aggregate number
and kind of shares or other property reserved for issuance under the Plan, in
the number, kind and exercise price of shares or other property subject to
outstanding Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, in the number and kind
of shares or other property subject to Restricted Stock Awards, and/or such
other equitable substitution or adjustments as it may determine to be fair and
appropriate in its sole discretion; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the number of
shares of common stock subject to an Award shall always be a whole number.  Any such adjusted exercise price shall also
be used to determine the amount payable by the Company upon the exercise of any
Stock Appreciation Right associated with any Stock Option.”


 


All other
terms and conditions of the Stock Incentive Plan remain in full force and
effect.  The Second Amendment to the
Stock Incentive Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on May 29, 2003 and
submitted to the Company’s stockholders for approval in connection with the
Company’s 2003 annual meeting.
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. 17-cv-00175 KAW

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

WAYNE SNODGRASS, State Bar #148137

Deputy City Attorney 

TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775 

CHRISTOPHER T. TOM, State Bar #271650 

Deputy City Attorney 

City Hall, Room 234 

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place 

San Francisco, California 94102-4682 

Telephone: (415) 554-4655 (Steeley) 

Telephone: (415) 554-4728 (Tom) 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4699 

E-Mail: tara.steeley@sfgov.org 

E-Mail: christopher.tom@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JENNIFER COOPER and ABOLITIONISTS 

NORTHWEST dba WORLD LIFE, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cv-00175 KAW 

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Action Filed: 1st Amend Complaint 2/7/2017 

Trial Date: Not Set 
 

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 

CASE NO. 17-cv-00175 KAW

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT: 

A settlement agreeable to all parties has been reached in the above-mentioned matter. The 

parties respectfully request that this case be dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: November 7, 2017 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

WAYNE SNODGRASS 

TARA M. STEELEY 

CHRISTOPHER T. TOM 

Deputy City Attorneys 

By: /s/Tara M. Steeley 

TARA M. STEELEY 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

Dated: November 7, 2017 

By: /s/ 

MICHAEL MILLEN 

Attorney At Law 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 JENNIFER COOPER and ABOLITIONISTS 

 NORTHWEST dba WORLD LIFE 

**Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has 

obtained approval from this signatory.* 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ 

 

Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

11/8/17
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROVIDING GUIDANCE 

REGARDING PARTICULAR ISSUES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

AND PROVIDING GUIDANCE 

REGARDING PARTICULAR ISSUES

The Court hereby CONTINUES the September 12, 2018 further case management 

conference to October 24, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. The parties shall file their joint case management 

statement by October 17, 2018. At the October 24, 2018 further case management conference, the 

parties shall be prepared to discuss limits on the number of motions in limine that may be filed in 

this case.

The Court also offers the following guidance regarding the particular issues presented in 

the September 5, 2018 joint case management statement. ECF No. 820 at 2–3.

First, the parties may advance their pretrial filing and exchange deadlines by agreement.

Second, the Court will not accept into evidence deposition testimony solely in writing.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 826 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROVIDING GUIDANCE 

REGARDING PARTICULAR ISSUES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Third, the parties may exchange demonstratives closer to trial, after the date dictated by 

Paragraph D.1(a) of this Court’s Standing Order. The parties shall be prepared to discuss the 

appropriate deadline for such exchanges at the December 13, 2018 final pretrial conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 7, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 826 Filed 09/07/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8) pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000
CEO Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 2001 UK Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the UK Company Share Option Plan of Pharsight
Corporation of our report dated April 27, 2001 with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Pharsight Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended March 31, 2001.



San
Jose, California
June 21, 2001

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 413 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 413

     Designating the week of October 3 through October 9, 2021, as 
                 ``National Community Policing Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2021

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Mr. Cornyn, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Van Hollen, and 
 Mr. Peters) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating the week of October 3 through October 9, 2021, as 
                 ``National Community Policing Week''.

Whereas police officers are indispensable members of the community who put their 
        lives on the line to protect others;
Whereas promoting strong relationships founded in trust and mutual respect 
        between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve helps 
        ensure the safe and effective execution of the law;
Whereas law enforcement officers and communities that work together to address 
        public safety concerns can create lasting solutions to difficult 
        challenges;
Whereas recent events have sparked a nationwide call to improve the interactions 
        between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve, 
        particularly communities of color;
Whereas community policing facilitates peaceful dialogue, capable of fostering 
        understanding and trust, between law enforcement officers and civilians;
Whereas community policing can help improve the equal enforcement of the laws;
Whereas community policing informs the public about the challenges that law 
        enforcement officers face in executing their duties and provides law 
        enforcement officers insight into the concerns of community members;
Whereas a long-term commitment to community policing is necessary to eliminate 
        the underlying causes of crime;
Whereas the advancement of community policing should be supported to ensure that 
        State and local law enforcement agencies have necessary resources; and
Whereas community policing has been recognized as an important tool for 
        improving the relationship between law enforcement officers and the 
        communities they serve: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of October 3 through October 9, 
        2021, as ``National Community Policing Week''; and
            (2) supports community policing and encourages the people 
        of the United States, law enforcement agencies, and elected 
        officials to identify ways in which communities can improve 
        public safety, strengthen relationships, and build trust.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Edward M. Jamison and Cathy Robinson each hereby certify as follows:



| | 1. | They are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Community Bancorp, a Nevada Corporation (the Company).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on their knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
(the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands
hereto as of this 10thday of May, 2006.



/s/    EDWARD M. JAMISONEdward M. Jamison President and Chief Executive Officer/s/    CATHY ROBINSONCathy Robinson Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:05-cr-00099-L Document 50 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 246
 

 Case 3:05-cr-00099-L Document 50 Filed 06/21/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 247
1 Un ited States District Judge for the Western District of

Louisiana, sitting by designation.

2 P ursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 96-31149

________________________

DOUGLAS R. WHITTINGTON, SR., JEAN WHITTINGTON, TONI WHITTINGTON &

JUSTIN WHITTINGTON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

OVERSEAS BULKTANK CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CV-3851)

_________________________________________________________________ March 26, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, Circuit Judges, and SHAW, District Judge. 1

PER CURIAM: 2

Douglas R. Whittington, his wife, and their two children

appeal from the judgment in their action under the Longshoremen

Harbor Workers Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 905(b), against the

Overseas Bulktank Corporation for injuries Douglas Whittington2

sustained during the mooring of the M/V OVERSEAS ARCTIC at the

Murphy Oil Company Facility on the Mississippi Ri ver. The

Whittingtons contend that the district court’s factual findings are

clearly erroneous and that the district court applied the incorrect

legal standard to their case.

We have reviewed the briefs and the pertinent portions of

the record, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for essentially the reasons relied upon by the district

court. S ee Whittington v. Overseas Bulk Tank, No. 94-CV-3851 (E.D.

La. June 18, 1996).

AFFIRMED.
Gina D. HELLER a/k/a Gina Heller, Appellant, v. PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Legal Title Trustee, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2605

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.