alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 24 (Thursday, February 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02271]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 28, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
606 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1159, K2025-1159.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-02271 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 23

- 00223

- CV
Ramiro ESPINOZA and Jeanette Espinoza, Appellants

v. Jesse FLORES , Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3 , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CV05800 Honorable David J. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2023
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed by June 12, 2023. Neither the brief n or a motion for extension of time was filed

. By order dated June 22, 2023 , appellant was ordered to
file h er brief and to show cause in writing by July 3, 2023 , why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution

. T E X

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)

. Ap pellant did not respond to this court’s order, and, to date, appellant has not filed a brief

. Because appellant failed to timely file a brief in this appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution

. See T E X

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
2010 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
6-15-2010 

# H a r tfor d Acc ide n t & I nde mnit y v . L a wr e nce F it zp atr ick
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 08-3650

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2010 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du
. Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" H a r tfor d Ac c ide n t & I nde mnit y v . L a w r e nc e F itzp a tr ick " (2010). 2010 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1067. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010/1067W i l l p a rti c i p a te a s a m e m b e r o f th e e n b a n c c o u rt p u rs u a n t t o 3 d . C i r. I. O .P . 9 .6 .4

. 1 U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L F O R T H E T H IRD C IR C U IT

_____________ No. 08-3650

_____________ In re: GL OB AL

I NDUSTRIAL

TECHNOL OGI ES, I

NC., et al., Debtors

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HA RTF ORD A CCI DENT AN D I ND EMNI TYCO MPA

NY ; F I RST STA TE I

NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NYCO ; TWI N C I TYF I RE I

NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NY ; CENTURY I

NDEMNI TY COMPANY, as suc cessor to CI GNA Spec ialty

Company , fo rm e rl y kn own a s Ca lif

or nia Un ion Ins ur anc e Com

pa ny ; WEST CH EST ER F I RE I NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NY , f or its e lf and fo r I nte rn atio na l In s ur an c e C o m

p any ( n o wkn o w na s T IG In s ur an c e C o mp any) (b y op e ratio n o f n ov atio n a ll r ights and ob lig atio ns un de r t

he po lic ie s have be en tra

nsfer red f rom International Insuranc e Co. to Westchester F ire Insuranc e Co.); NATI ONAL

UNI ON F I RE I

NSURANCE COMPANY OF PI TTSBURGH, PA; I

NSURANCE COMPANY OF TH E STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; L EXI NGTONI

NSURANCE COMPANY; AMERI CAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, and any other e ntities related to American International Group, Inc. that eng ag ed in business transa ctions with the Reorg anizing De btors,

Ap pe lla nts P RES ENT : M CKEE , Ch i e f J u d g e , S CI RI CA, AM BRO, F UENTE S , S M I TH, F I S HER, C H A G A R E S , J O R D A N , V A N A S K IE , a n d N Y G A A R D , C ir c u it J u d g e s . 1 A M E N D E D O R D E R* A m aj o ri ty

o f t h e a ct i v e j u d ges h av i n g v o t edfo r r eh eari n g en bancin t he a bo ve a pp e a l, i t i s o rd er edth atth e C l erk

o f t h i s C o urtl i s tth e ab o v e c as e f o r r eh eari n g en bancat the conve nience of the Court
. BYTHE COURT, /s/ Theodore A . McKe e DATED: June 15, 2010 Chief J udg e crg/cc: All counse l of rec ord
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period                ending September                30,                2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                           |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending September                30,                2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and results of operations of Alliance Recovery                Corp. |

**ALLIANCE      RECOVERY CORP.**

*/s/      Peter Vaisler*
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                FDA Organization Charts

FDA Organization Charts Home
          About FDA
          FDA Organization
          FDA Organization Charts
          Office of Regulatory Affairs Organization ChartFDA Organization Charts Office of Regulatory Affairs Organization Chart
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintORA Leadership
Text version of the above chart | Printer-friendly Version (PDF - 123KB)

Return to FDA Organization Charts

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      12/07/2023FDA Organization Charts
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
# m8456.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14.7.2017 C(2017) 5139 final To the Notifying Party Subject : Case M. 8456 – I NEOS / FORTIES PIPELINE SYSTEM Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 20 June 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking INEOS FPS Limited (UK) ( owned by INEOS Limited , Isle of Man) , together “INEOS” , acquires within the me aning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Forties Pipeline System ( “FPS”, UK ) and interests in the North and South Graben Area Export Lines ("GAEL spurlines ", together with FPS referred to as the "FPS Business") , by way of purchase of assets . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - INEO S is a global manufacturer of petrochemical s, speciality chemicals and oil products. INEOS has limited activities in the upstream o il and gas sector; - FPS Business is an integrated oil and natural gas liquids pipeline transportation and processing system located in the UK Northern North Sea . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 205 , 29.6.2017 , p. 61 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELIDIA M. DUARTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANDREW SAUL,

Defendant.

Case No. 20-cv-00151-JCS 

Also Filed in Case No. 16-cv-07142-EMC

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SUA SPONTE REFERALL TO 

DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE 

RELATED

Plaintiff Elidia M. Duarte, pro se, brings this action alleging that Defendant Andrew Saul, 

Commissioner of Social Security, (the “Commissioner”) violated Duarte’s rights under the First 

and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, as well as federal statutes including the 

Administrative Procedures Act, in failing to provide sufficient process for Duarte’s challenge to 

adverse decisions regarding unpaid or purportedly overpaid social security benefits.

Duarte has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause having 

been shown, that application is GRANTED. Issued of service of process and the sufficiency of 

the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) will be determined separately.

Duarte filed a previous case against an earlier Commissioner, Carolyn Colvin, raising 

similar claims. That case was assigned to the Honorable Edward Chen, who dismissed Duarte’s 

claims for lack of jurisdiction, holding that Duarte had failed to obtain a final decision from the

Commissioner before filing a judicial action. See Duarte v. Colvin, No. 16-cv-07142-EMC, ECF 

Doc. No. 24 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2017). According to Duarte’s complaint, further administrative 

proceedings have occurred since that order, but it is not clear whether Duarte has obtained a final 

decision from the Commissioner. 

This case is REFERRED to Judge Chen to determine whether it is related to case number 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

16-cv-07142 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c). Duarte may file a response to this order 

supporting or opposing finding the cases related no later than February 14, 2020. See Civ. L.R. 

3-12(c), 3-12(e), 7-11(b).

Duarte, who is not represented by counsel, is encouraged to consult with the Federal Pro 

Bono Project’s Legal Help Center in either of the Oakland or San Francisco federal courthouses 

for assistance. The San Francisco Legal Help Center office is located in Room 2796 on the 15th 

floor at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. The Oakland office is located in 

Room 470-S on the 4th floor at 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612. Appointments can be 

made by calling (415) 782-8982 or signing up in the appointment book located outside either 

office. Lawyers at the Legal Help Center can provide basic assistance to parties representing 

themselves but cannot provide legal representation

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2020

______________________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 504 

Commending and congratulating the Coffeyville Community College Red 

Ravens men’s basketball team on winning the 2021 National Junior 

College Athletic Association Division I men’s basketball championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2022 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. MARSHALL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending and congratulating the Coffeyville Community 

College Red Ravens men’s basketball team on winning 

the 2021 National Junior College Athletic Association 

Division I men’s basketball championship. 

Whereas, on Saturday, April 24, 2021, the Coffeyville Community College Red Ravens men’s basketball team (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘Red Ravens’’) defeated 

the Cowley County Community College Tigers by a score 

of 108 to 99 in the 2021 National Junior College Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the 

‘‘NJCAA’’) Division I men’s basketball championship 

game; 

Whereas the 2021 national championship is the first for the 

Red Ravens since 1962; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 504 ATS 

Whereas, in addition to winning the national championship, 

the Red Ravens won a share of the Kansas Jayhawk 

Community College Conference East title; 

Whereas, in the championship game, freshman center Blaise 

Keita had a career-high 27 points on 13–16 shooting; 

Whereas guard Tylor Perry— 

(1) had 18 points in the championship game; and 

(2) was named the Most Valuable Player of the 

2021 NJCAA Division I men’s basketball championship 

tournament; 

Whereas Love Bettis, Blaise Keita, and Tylor Perry were 

named to the All-Tournament team; and 

Whereas head coach Jay Herkelman was named the 2021 

NJCAA Division I men’s basketball coach of the year: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the Coffeyville Community Col3 lege Red Ravens men’s basketball team on winning 

4 the 2021 National Junior College Athletic Associa5 tion Division I men’s basketball championship; 

6 (2) recognizes the players, coaches, and staff of 

7 the Coffeyville Community College Red Ravens 

8 men’s basketball team; and 

9 (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of 

10 the Senate transmit an enrolled copy of this resolu11 tion to— 

12 (A) the President of Coffeyville Community 

13 College, Dr. Marlon Thornburg; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 504 ATS 

1 (B) the Athletic Director of Coffeyville 

2 Community College, Jeff Leiker; and 

3 (C) the head coach of the Coffeyville Com4 munity College Red Ravens men’s basketball 

5 team, Jay Herkelman. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# m8591.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.9.2017 C(2017) 6462 final To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M. 8591 – VW CREDIT / DAIMLER / AUTOGRAVITY Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 24 August 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Daimler AG (‘Daimler’, Germany) and VW Credit, Inc. (‘VCI’, United States) belonging to the group Volkswagen AG (‘Volkswagen’, Germany) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking AutoGravity Corporation (‘ AutoGravity ’, United States) by way of a purchase of shares. . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Daimler : the manufacture and distribution of passenger cars and commercial vehicles, and also the provision of financial services, including financing, leasing, insurance and fleet management services, - for VCI : serving Volkswagen’s retail customers and dealers in the United States, offering financial products and services including retail leasing and financing for new and used vehicles, - for AutoGravity : the provision to consumers in the United States of a comparison app for vehicle financing and leasing, accessible via smartphone or via AutoGravity’s website. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( a ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 287 , 31.08.2017 , p . 7 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Exhibit 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2005

I, Iurie Bordian, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Emerging Media Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company


                                     /s/Iurie Bordian
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Iurie Bordian
                                     President
                                     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                     Officer

                                     Dated: November 08, 2007
Brian M. CASEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D19-1019

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 1, 2019

Brian M. Casey, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 12 PageID 2
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 3 of 12 PageID 3
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 4 of 12 PageID 4
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 5 of 12 PageID 5
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 6 of 12 PageID 6
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 7 of 12 PageID 7
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 8 of 12 PageID 8
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 9 of 12 PageID 9
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 10 of 12 PageID 10
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 11 of 12 PageID 11
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01696-D Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 12 of 12 PageID 12