alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT J UNE 11 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 06- 1287 0

D. C. Docket N o. 94-02700 CV -T W T- 1 SALVADOR MAGLUTA, Pl ai nti ff -Appe lla nt,

ve rs us F. P. SA M SA MPL ES , MIC HAEL W . GARRETT, MIC HAEL BELL , D ef en da nts -Appe lle es .

Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the N or the rn D ist ri ct

of G eo rg ia (J un e 11, 200 7) Before DU BIN A a nd BLA CK, Circuit Judges, and RE ST AN I, * Judg e. PE R CU RIA M:

_______________________ *Honora ble J ane A . Restani, Chief J udg e, United States Court of Interna tional Trade , sitti ng by desig nation.Bivens v. Six Unk nown Named Agents of Fed. Bure au of Narcotics , 40 3 U. S. 38 8, 91 S. Ct

. 1 1999 (1971). 2 Appellant/Plaintiff, Salvador Magluta, appeals the district court’ s order gr an tin g su m

m ar y j udgm en t on his B iv en s a ct ion

. A ft er r ev ie w ing the r ec or d, 1

re ad ing the pa rt ie s’ br ie fs , a nd h av ing the be ne fi t of or al a rg um en t, w e fi rs t

co n cl u d e t h at t h e e v i d en ce d o es n o t es t ab l i s h t h at t h e c o n d i t i o n s o f M ag l u t a’s pr et ri al de te nti on a m ount ed to puni shm en t, in vio la tio n of his F if th A m en dm en t subs ta nti ve due pr oc es s r igh ts. Ma glu tapos ed a se ri ous an d le git im at e se cu ri ty risk, and his detention wa s not an exaggerated response. W e conclude from

the rec ord, m oreover, that, r egardless of w hether Magluta had a protected liberty interest, he rec eived all the process he wa s due. A cc or din gly , w e af

fi rm the dis tr ic t c our t’ s gr an t of sum m ar y j udgm en t. AFFIRMED.
OFFICE OF THE CLERK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

 CIVIL MINUTES

Date: January 2, 2018 Time: 27 minutes Judge: NATHANAEL M. 

COUSINS

Case No. 17-cv-00220-LHK Case Name: Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm 

Incorporated

Attorney for Qualcomm: Richard Stark 

Attorney for Non-Party Contract Manufacturers: Jason Lo 

Deputy Clerk: Lili Harrell FTR Time: 1:04pm – 1:31pm

PROCEEDINGS

Hearing re Discovery Letter Brief [433]: 

The Court granted in part and denied in part the disputed document discovery requested by 

Qualcomm from third party Contract Manufacturers (CMs) as follows.

1. By 3:00 p.m. today, Qualcomm to identify one witness (choosing either Clark Chung or 

Kevin Huang) to withdraw as a document custodian. Qualcomm must communicate this 

selection to CM counsel.

2. Search strings 117, 118, and 125 DENIED.

3. Search strings 66 and 154 each GRANTED with 12/26 edits.

4. Search strings 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, and 107 each GRANTED with CMs' 10/31 proposed string.

5. Qualcomms' "go-get" specific demands from December 14 letter DENIED as tardy.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 439 Filed 01/02/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER VINCERA, INC. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I am the Chief Executive Officer of Vincera, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company).  I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-QSB). Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, David R. Malmstedt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 14, 2007 /s/ David R. Malmstedt Name: David R. Malmstedt Title: Chief Executive Officer, (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)    1
Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Intelli-Check, Inc.

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Form S-8  (Nos.  333-85436  and  333-47882)  and on form S-3  (Nos.  333-127663,
333-104598 and 333-59494) of  Intelli-Check,  Inc., of our report dated March 3,
2006,  relating to the  financial  statements  contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.



/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.
------------------------------------
New York, New York
March 28, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the Federal Register

          - 5 CFR Chapter XL

The Director of the Federal Register, pursuant to his authority to maintain an orderly system of codification under 44 U.S.C. 1510 and 1 CFR 8.2, hereby reinstates Chapter XL of Title 5, consisting of Parts 5000 to 5099, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
      ( print page 9507)    

              Editorial Note            

#### Editorial Note:

On December 26, 2024, at 89 FR 104,859, the Director of the Federal Register removed 5 CFR Chapter XL pursuant to section 101 of Public Law 104-88, which abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission on December 29, 1995, effective January 1, 1996. However, Public Law 104-88 also includes a savings provision in section 204, stating that all regulations in effect under the Interstate Commerce Commission continue in effect under the Surface Transportation Board. Therefore, the regulations at 5 CFR Chapter XL continue in effect pursuant to Public Law 104-88, section 204, and the removal was in error.

Accordingly, Chapter XL of Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations is hereby reinstated as of December 26, 2024.

[FR Doc. 2025-02666 Filed 2-12-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 0099-10-D
Office of

Media

Relations

Media Services Staff

Internet Services Staff

Audio-Visual Services Staff

Office of

General

Counsel

Administrative Law Div.

Litigation Div.

Office of

Engineering &

Technology

Electromagnetic Compatibility Div.

Laboratory Div.

Policy & Rules Div.

Administrative Staff

Office of

Managing

Director

Human Resources Management

Information Technology

Financial Operations

Administrative Operations

Performance & Program Mgmt

Secretary

Enterprise Acquisition Center

Economic Analysis Div.

Auctions Div.

Data Div.

Industry Analysis Div.

Office of

Economics &

Analytics

Office of

Communications

Business Opportunities

Office of

Legislative

Affairs

Wireless

Telecommunications

Bureau

Management & Resources Staff

Technologies, Systems &

Innovation Div.

Competition & Infrastructure Policy Div.

Mobility Div.

Broadband Div.

Media

Bureau

Mgmt. & Resources Staff

Policy Div.

Industry Analysis Div.

Audio Div.

Video Div.

Consumer &

Governmental

Affairs Bureau

Admin. & Mgmt. Office

Consumer Inquiries & Complaints Div.

Consumer Policy Div.

Office of Native Affairs and Policy

 Disability Rights Office

Consumer Affairs & Outreach Div.

Office of Intergovernmental Affairs

Web & Print Publishing Div.

Enforcement

Bureau

Office of Management & Resources

Telecommunications Consumers Div.

Spectrum Enforcement Div.

Market Disputes Resolution Div.

Investigations & Hearings Div.

Fraud Div.

Regional & Field Offices

Office of

Workplace

Diversity

Commissioners

Jessica Rosenworcel, Chairwoman

Brendan Carr Geoffrey Starks Nathan Simington Anna M. Gomez

Office of

Administrative Law Judges

Office of

Inspector General 

Public Safety &

Homeland Security

Bureau

Admin. & Mgmt. Office

Policy & Licensing Div.

Cybersecurity & Communications

Reliability Div.

Operations & Emergency Mgmt. Div.

Office of

International

Affairs

Telecommunications & Analysis Div.

Global Strategy & Negotiation Div.

Wireline

Competition

Bureau

Admin. & Mgmt. Office

Competition Policy Div.

Pricing Policy Div.

Telecommunications Access Policy Div.

Space

Bureau

Earth Station Licensing Div.

Satellite Licensing Div.

Satellite Programs and Policy Div.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO.,LIMITED, Successor-in-interest to ST. PAULREINSURANCE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.,THE FORT MILLER CO. andBEECHE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

)))))))))))))))

No. C05-1912 BZ

NOTICE RE HEARING

The parties should be prepared to discuss, at tomorrow’s

hearing, what evidence there is in the record that:

1.  Defendants had any Beeche brochures in early 1999.

2.  Beeche brochures were or were not sent by AGF to U.S.

Risk in early 1999.

3.  U.S. Risk received the signed version of the 1999

application.   

Dated: December 16, 2008

                                      Bernard Zimmerman

                              United States Magistrate Judge

g:\bzall\-bzcases\Unionamerica v. Fort Miller\Notice Re Hearing 12.17.08.wpd

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ   Document 232   Filed 12/16/08   Page 1 of 1
# m8572.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.8.2017 C(2017) 5970 final To the notifying party Subject : Case M. 8572 – PAMPLONA CAPITAL / PAREXEL Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 01 August 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Pamplona Capital Management LLP (UK) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Parexel International Corporation (USA) by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - For Pamplona Capital Management LLP : global private equity investment, providing an investment platform across private equity, fund of hedge funds and single manager hedge fund investments. - For P a rexel International Corporation: biopharmaceutical outsourcing services, providing a broad range of expertise in clinical research, clinical logistics, medical communications, consulting, commercialization and advanced technology products and services to the worldwide pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
(S igned)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 259 , 09.8.2017 , p. 9 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly Henderson, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
November 12, 2010




/s/ Molly HendersonMolly
      HendersonChief
      Business and Financial Officer and Senior Vice
  President





This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOESPH H. HUNT

Assistant Attorney General

DAVID L. ANDERSON

United States Attorney

JOHN R. TYLER

Assistant Branch Director

DANIEL D. MAULER

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

1100 L Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20005

Telephone: (202) 616-0773

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

E-mail: dan.mauler@usdoj.gov

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS

(See signature page for parties represented.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., 

Defendants.

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF 

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND 

SUBSTITUTION

No. 3:17-cv-00485-WHO

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Daniel D. Mauler, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, 

hereby enters his appearance in place of W. Scott Simpson, on behalf of Defendants Donald J. 

Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States; the United States of America; 

Kevin K. McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security; and 

William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States (collectively, the 

“Defendants”). Mr. Mauler will handle this matter going forward.

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 227 Filed 04/25/19 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH H. HUNT

Assistant Attorney General

DAVID L. ANDERSON

United States Attorney

JOHN R. TYLER

Assistant Branch Director

/s/ Daniel D. Mauler

 

DANIEL D. MAULER 

(Va. Bar No.: 73190)

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division - Federal Programs Branch

1100 L Street, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20005

Telephone: (202) 202-616-0773

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

E-mail: dan.mauler@usdoj.gov

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 227 Filed 04/25/19 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH BUTLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNKNOWN,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-07166-KAW (PR)

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY 

CLOSING CASE

On December 15, 2016, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a letter to 

the Court complaining of prison conditions which was construed as an attempt to file a civil rights 

action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The same day, the Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff a notice that he 

must file a complaint using the Court’s form complaint within twenty-eight days from the filing 

date of the notice to avoid dismissal. (Docket No. 2.) Plaintiff was provided with a blank copy of 

the form complaint.

On January 19, 2017, Plaintiff responded with a letter to the Court, stating that he did not 

intend to file a civil rights action. (Docket No. 5.) 

Good cause appearing, the Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Because 

this case was opened in error, the Clerk of the Court shall not charge a filing fee. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2017

______________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:16-cv-07166-KAW Document 6 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 1
XXXXXXx

Case 3:05-cr-00294-JL Document 31 Filed 07/31/06 Page 1 of 2
July 31, 2006 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge James Larson

Case 3:05-cr-00294-JL Document 31 Filed 07/31/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 8109-8110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01759]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 15 / Friday, January 24, 2025 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 8109]]

                Executive Order 14146 of January 19, 2025

                
Partial Revocation of Executive Order 13961

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces 
                of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

                Section 1. Revocation. Sections 1, 3, 4, 5, and 7 of 
                Executive Order 13961 of December 7, 2020 (Governance 
                and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience), are 
                hereby revoked. Sections 2, 6, and 8 of Executive Order 
                13961 are renumbered as Sections 1, 2, and 3, 
                respectively. Section 1 of Executive Order 13961, as 
                renumbered, is amended by striking the clause ``To 
                achieve this policy, in conjunction'' and inserting in 
                its place the words ``In conjunction''. Section 2(b) of 
                Executive Order 13961, as renumbered, is amended by 
                striking the clause ``the Executive Committee 
                established in section 3 of this order'' and inserting 
                in its place the words ``the Restricted Principals 
                Committee described in section 3 of the National 
                Security Memorandum of January 19, 2025 (National 
                Continuity Policy)''.

                Sec. 2. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order 
                shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or 
the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

                    (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with 
                applicable law and subject to the availability of 
                appropriations.

[[Page 8110]]

                    (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, 
                create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 
                enforceable at law or in equity by any party against 
                the United States, its departments, agencies, or 
                entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any 
                other person.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    January 19, 2025.

[FR Doc. 2025-01759
Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3395-F4-P
```
Beyond the Analysis: 

An Approach to Operationalizing 

Your Results using Open Source 

JavaScript Frameworks

Dylan L. Holt

Analytics Developer | Accenture Federal Services

GASP Conference | September 23rd, 2019
A key challenge in data science 

today is that last mile – moving 

from analysis and findings to a 

production-grade, user-centric 

application. 
From Useful Information

To Utilized Insight

Know the 

Problem

Understand 

the User

Connect the Product

Is my analysis intended to be applied?

Are my features available in real world?

Would feedback be helpful to my analysis?

Who would find my analysis useful?

How would someone use my analysis?

Can someone provide feedback to my analysis?
JavaScript is more 

than you think.

Know the 

Problem

Understand 

the User

Connect the 

Product

Front End Frameworks 

expediate UI Development.

Charting libraries provide 

great Data Viz capabilities.

Machine Learning can be 

done in the browser.

Visualization

User Interface

ML/Analytics
So you just built an image classifier 

but what now... 

Know the 

Problem

Understand 

the User

Connect the Product



Questions?

Dylan L. Holt

Analytics Developer | Accenture Federal Services

Email: dylan.l.holt@accenturefederal.com