alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

GREENLIGHT ORGANIC, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00005-MEJ 

ORDER FINDING AS MOOT MOTION 

TO DISMISS; VACATING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Re: Dkt. No. 14

Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants. Dkt. No. 14. 

However, on March 8, 2017, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 16. Under Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 15, a party may amend its pleading once “as a matter of course” within 

“21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). 

“[T]he general rule is that an amended complaint supercedes the original complaint and renders it 

without legal effect . . . .” Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 

As Plaintiff had not previously amended its Complaint and filed the Amended Complaint within 

21 days after Defendants served the motion to dismiss, Plaintiff could file an amended complaint 

as a matter of course under Rule 15(a). 

Further, “[d]ismissal of the superseded original complaint would not alter the proceedings 

. . . as the parties would continue to litigate the merits of the claims contained in the now-operative 

First Amended Complaint.” See Liberi v. Defend Our Freedoms Founds., Inc., 509 F. App’x 595, 

596 (9th Cir. 2013) (dismissing as moot appeal of denial of an anti-SLAPP motion regarding a 

superseded complaint). Since the Motion to Dismiss is based on the original complaint, the Court 

hereby DENIES the Motion as moot. Defendants shall file an answer or other responsive pleading 

no later than March 30, 2017. No further amendments may be made without seeking leave of 

Court pursuant to Rule 15 and Civil Local Rule 7. 

Case 3:17-cv-00005-MEJ Document 18 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

The Court also vacates the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for April 6, 

2017, and associated deadlines. The Court will reschedule the Conference after the pleadings are 

settled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2017

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00005-MEJ Document 18 Filed 03/09/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES V. SALMAN, 4-17-70058-MAG 1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Charles D. Swift, Esq. 

Constitutional Law Center for 

 Muslims in America 

833 E. Arapaho Rd., Suite 102 

Richardson, TX 75081 

Phone: (972) 914-2507 

Fax: (972) 692-7454 

cswift@clcma.org

Pro Hac Counsel for Defendant SALMAN 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

NOOR SALMAN, 

 Defendant. 

 No. Case No.: 4-17-70058-MAG 

 ORDER

 

ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 

Pursuant to Defense request to file a Motion and Order for Release of Records under seal, 

it is hereby ordered that the requested Motion and Order are to be filed under seal by the Clerk’s 

Office. The Court finds that as sealing both documents allows for the safety of the evaluator to 

conduct Noor Salman’s evaluation in privacy and out of the line of scrutiny of others, which 

might otherwise be compromised by the public disclosure of the contents of said documents. 

Dated: 

 ______________________________ 

 United States District Judge/Magistrate 

cc: Attorney 

 Court File 

February 8, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 4:17-mj-70058-MAG Document 21 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 1
STRATS Trust for AMBAC Financial Group, Inc. Securities, Series 2007-1 10-K

Exhibit 35.1



SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

U.S. Bank Trust National Association



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the “Trustee”),
as Trustee in respect of the STRATS Trust for AMBAC Financial Group, Inc. Securities, Series 2007-1 (the “Trust”),
does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Bank is Trustee under the Trust Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
Trust.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | A review of the Trustee’s activities during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016 and of its performance under
the Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement
in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed
this Certificate this 24th day of March 2017.

|       |                       |  | 
|------ | --------------------- |  | 
|By:    | /s/ Amy B. Byrnes     | 
|Name:  | Amy B. Byrnes         | 
|Title: | Senior Vice President |
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARUNEE RYLES,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

PALACE HOTEL,

Defendant(s). /

No. C-04-5326 SBA (MEJ)

NOTICE AND ORDER SCHEDULING

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

TO ALL PARTIES and their Attorneys of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case per Judge Armstrong's order has been rescheduled

for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. The Settlement

Conference shall take place on August 28, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. in Judge James’ chambers, located

at the Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, San Francisco, California 94102. On

the date of the settlement conference, counsel and parties shall use the telephone adjacent to

chambers' security entrance to notify the Court of their arrival. The parties shall notify the Court if

the matter has settled or been dismissed before the date of the conference.

Settlement Conference statements shall be submitted in accordance with Magistrate Judge

James' STANDING ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCEDURES, a copy of

which may be obtained from the Northern District of California's website at 

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. From the homepage, click on the "Judges" tab on the left margin,

Case 4:04-cv-05326-SBA Document 29 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

then choose Magistrate Judge James.

When filing papers that require the Court to take any action (e.g. motions, calendaring issues,

administrative requests or a request to be excused from attendance), the parties shall, in addition to

filing papers electronically, lodge with chambers a printed copy of the papers by the close of the

next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. These printed copies shall be

marked “Chambers Copy” and shall be submitted to the Clerk’s Office, in an envelope clearly

marked with Judge James’ name, case number and “E-Filing Chambers Copy.” Parties shall not file

a paper copy of any document with the Clerk’s Office that has already been filed electronically. 

Any proposed orders must also be emailed to: mejpo@cand.uscourts.gov

Please contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Brenda Tolbert, at (415) 522-4708 with any

questions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:04-cv-05326-SBA Document 29 Filed 08/09/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quorum Ventures, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date:  October 11, 2006


/s/ Steven Bolton
-------------------------------------------
Steven Bolton, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
# L_2017344EN.01000101.xml

| 23.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 344/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2017/2428

of 30 November 2017

on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 207 and 209, in conjunction with point (a) of Article 218(6) thereof,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Republic of Croatia, and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision 2014/718/EU (2), the Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part (‘the Protocol’) has been signed, subject to its conclusion at a later date. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision 2014/718/EU (2), the Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part (‘the Protocol’) has been signed, subject to its conclusion at a later date.

| (2) | The Protocol should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Protocol should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union is hereby approved on behalf of the European Union and its Member States.

The text of the Protocol is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to deposit, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, the instrument of approval provided for in Article 4(1) of the Protocol.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2017.

For the Council

The President

K. SIMSON

---

(1)  Consent given on 8 June 2016.

1

(2)  Council Decision 2014/718/EU of 8 October 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (OJ L 300, 18.10.2014, p. 3).

2

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MATTHEW WAYNE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-06994-PJH 

ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 166

Before the court is Relator’s January 4, 2023 motion for order overruling objections 

to trial subpoena and to compel production of documents. Third party subpoena recipient 

and defendants filed an opposition on January 18, 2023. The court would prefer to hear 

this motion before its noticed date of February 9, 2023, and presumes plaintiff would 

agree given that the motion was initially incorrectly noticed for hearing on today’s date, 

January 19, 2023. Accordingly, the court directs Relator to file its reply brief by January 

24, 2023. The motion will be heard via Zoom on January 26, 2023, at 1:30 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 19, 2023

/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:16-cv-06994-PJH Document 182 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 1
# L_2017114EN.01002301.xml

| 3.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 114/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 114/23

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/765

of 2 May 2017

approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Ovčí salašnícky údený syr (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Slovakia's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the traditional speciality guaranteed ‘Ovčí salašnícky údený syr’, registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 930/2010 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Slovakia's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the traditional speciality guaranteed ‘Ovčí salašnícky údený syr’, registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 930/2010 (2).

| (2) | Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(b) of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(b) of that Regulation.

| (3) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Ovčí salašnícky údený syr’ (TSG) are hereby approved.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 May 2017.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 930/2010 of 18 October 2010 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Ovčí salašnícky údený syr (TSG)] (OJ L 273, 19.10.2010, p. 5).

2

(3)  
  OJ C 388, 21.10.2016, p. 10.

3

---
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER GRANTING QUALCOMM’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No.17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING QUALCOMM’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1432

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Qualcomm’s motion to seal 

as follows:

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

FTC’s Shapiro Rebuttal 

Trial Demonstrative

Selected portions of pages 10-11 GRANTED.

CX4401 Selected portions of pages 001-002, 

005, 008, 011

GRANTED.

Injung Lee Deposition Selected portions of 227:20-23 GRANTED.

Qualcomm shall publicly file redacted versions of these documents consistent with the 

Court’s sealing rulings by January 28, 2019, at 12:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1443 Filed 01/25/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER GRANTING QUALCOMM’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Dated: January 25, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1443 Filed 01/25/19 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John M. Piecuch, as Chief Executive Officer of MMI Products, Inc. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MMI Products, Inc. and will be retained by MMI Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|Dated:  March 28, 2003 |                               
|---------------------- | ------------------------------
|                       | By: /s/John M. Piecuch        
|                       | John M. Piecuch, President    
|                       | and Chief Executive Officer of
|                       | MMI Products, Inc.
Case 3:17-cv-00231-EMC   Document 33   Filed 02/15/17   Page 1 of 7

Case 3:17-cv-00231-EMC   Document 33   Filed 02/15/17   Page 2 of 7

Case 3:17-cv-00231-EMC   Document 33   Filed 02/15/17   Page 3 of 7

Case 3:17-cv-00231-EMC   Document 33   Filed 02/15/17   Page 4 of 7

Case 3:17-cv-00231-EMC   Document 33   Filed 02/15/17   Page 5 of 7

Case 3:17-cv-00231-EMC   Document 33   Filed 02/15/17   Page 6 of 7

Case 3:17-cv-00231-EMC   Document 33   Filed 02/15/17   Page 7 of 7
CX2168-001

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 1 of 15
CX2168-002

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 2 of 15
CX2168-003

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 3 of 15
CX2168-004

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 4 of 15
CX2168-005

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 5 of 15
CX2168-006

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 6 of 15
CX2168-007

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 7 of 15
CX2168-008

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 8 of 15
CX2168-009

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 9 of 15
CX2168-010

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 10 of 15
CX2168-011

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 11 of 15
CX2168-012

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 12 of 15
CX2168-013

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 13 of 15
CX2168-014

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY MOTO-QUAL-01320238.pptx

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 14 of 15
CX2168-015

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1184 Filed 01/08/19 Page 15 of 15