alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 23

- 11453 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JACOB NATHANIEL NELSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:22

- cr
- 00119

- RBD

- EJK

- 9

____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-11453 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 03/06/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 11453

Befor e J ILL P RYOR , B RA SHER , and A BUDU , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforc ed if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd , 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) (noting that the touchstone for assessing if a sentence appeal waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily is whether it was clearly conveyed to the def endant that he was giving up his right to appeal under most circumstances); United States v. Grinard

Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or ev en blatant error)

. USCA11 Case: 23-11453 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 03/06/2024 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit
10.1


 


STRAIGHT NOTE


 


	
  $300,000

  	
  South El Monte,
  California

  	
  July 17, 2003

  



 


For value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises to
pay Monticello Drug Company or order, at South El Monte, California the sum of
THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS, with interest adjusted to the date funds are
received, on unpaid principal at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum.  Interest only will be payable on the 20th
of each month commencing August 20, 2003. 
Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the unpaid principal
balance daily, based on a 365-day year, actual day month and payable monthly.
Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United
States.  If action were instituted on
this note, I promise to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees.
This note is secured by the trademark on the product brand Aquafilter®.  The due date of this note is October 12,
2005 or later.


 


After two years, from July 17, 2003, either party can
give 90 days written notice to pay off or ask for the funds back.


 


1)  General
Corporate Obligation


 


2)  Personal
Guarantee of Ronald G. Lee


 


 


	
   

  	
  JULY 9, 2003

  	
   

  	
  RONALD G. LEE

  
	
   

  	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals -
  Ronald G. Lee

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
  JULY 9, 2003

  	
   

  	
  MICHAEL L. AGRESTI

  
	
   

  	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Lee Pharmaceuticals -
  Michael L. Agresti
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly
      Henderson ,
      as
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: November
      14, 2008




/s/
                Molly HendersonMolly
                HendersonChief
                Business and Financial Officer





This
      Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1880

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Middle Kingdom Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert J. Kinloch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 23rd day of January, 2006.



| | /s/ Robert Kinloch                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert J. Kinloch                                  
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
Kennedy C. PRATHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5461

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christopher Demetrius SIMPKINS Jr, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3269

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 21, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Demerrius Antwon STALLWORTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3920

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 29th District Court of Palo Pinto County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on May 31,

2018, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Raymond Sambow Vargas v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-18-00129-CR Trial Court Number: 16044

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated May 31, 2018, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the 29th District

Court of Palo Pinto County, Texas for further proceedings in accordance with this

Court’s opinion entered this day.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on May 31, 2018

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
EXHIBIT 32.02

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc. as managing member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC, certify that (i) the Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 of
TriView Global Fund, LLC fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2006
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of TriView Global Fund, LLC.


TRIVIEW GLOBAL FUND, LLC
By:	TriView Capital Management, Inc., Managing Member


By: /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:	August 14, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

NORMA BELL FELDER )

)

V. ) 3-05-CV-2121-N

)

MICHAEL EDWARD FELDER, ET AL )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the

proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court

accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Signed March 29, 2006.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02121-N Document 7 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 22
EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 1 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 2 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 2 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 3 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 3 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 4 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 4 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 5 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 5 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 6 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 6 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 7 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 7 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 8 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 8 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 9 of 24
Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 10 of 24 Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 9 of 23
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 10 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 11 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 11 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 12 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 12 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 13 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 13 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 14 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 14 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 15 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 15 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 16 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 16 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 17 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 17 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 18 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 18 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 19 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 19 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 20 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 20 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 21 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 21 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 22 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 22 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 23 of 24
Case 3:04-cv-01661-WHA Document 12-1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 23 of 23 Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-1 Filed 02/09/17 Page 24 of 24
ANTHONY SCAARANGELLA, JR., Appellant, v. MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC./LIBERTY INSURANCE CORP., Appellees.

No. 1D18-4519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Dewayne Lamar WALKER

1161141 (CR-16-0298)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Place, 6th Floor

San Jose, CA 95110

408-279-2288 ph: 408-279-2299 fax

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION

STACY CASE,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUIFAX, INC.; et. al.,

 

 Defendants.

Case No.: 4:17-CV-00399-JSW

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH 

DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT plaintiff Stacy Case and defendant Equifax, Inc. by 

and through their respective counsel of record, have reached a settlement in principle of the 

above captioned case and are in the process of documenting said settlement. The parties believe 

the settlement will be finalized within 30 days. 

Sagaria Law, P.C.

Dated: March 21, 2017 /s/ Elliot Gale 

Elliot Gale

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:17-cv-00399-JSW Document 22 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LAWRENCE OLIVER PETERKIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1602

[August 3, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 312011CF001234.

Lawrence Oliver Peterkin, Perry, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: David Martinez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-19-00906-CR

Trial court case number: 1586127

Trial court: 185th District Court of Harris County

Appellant has filed a motion to abate this appeal to allow for corrections to be made 

to certain errors in the clerk’s record. On March 26, 2020, the Clerk of this Court issued a 

notice, directing the clerk of the 185th District Court, within ten days of the date of the 

notice, to file a supplemental clerk’s record correcting the errors in the clerk’s record. On 

March 31, 2020, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed with this Court.

Because a supplemental clerk’s record was filed, appellant’s motion is dismissed 

as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes_____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __April 14, 2020____
AMENDMENT
TO EXPLORATION AND OPTION TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT

     

    Date
November 19, 2008

     

    North
American Minerals Group Inc. (“NAMG”) and Ice Resources Inc., (“ICE”) have
entered into an Exploration and Option to Purchase Agreement effective and
signed on August 21, 2007.

     

    Pursuant
to Article 3 “Option to Acquire the Property” and in item 3.2 or such agreement
NAMG is obligated to Exploration Expenditures of CDN$100,000 on the First,
Second and Third year anniversary’s effective as of the date of the
agreement.

     

    ICE and
NAMG have renegotiated the required expenditure waving the First year obligation
and increasing the Second year obligation to CDN$200,000.  The Third
year obligation remains at CDN$100,000.  It is understood by ICE that
NAMG has already spent approximately CDN$50,000 before the First year
anniversary.

     

    In
consideration for the this Amendment to the agreement NAMG has agreed to grant
ICE 100,000 Options to purchase its Common Share at the time NAMG is authorized
to issue such Options.  The price of each Option to purchase Common
Share will be priced at the Public Offering price which is deemed to be 30 cents
CDN.

     

    Date this
19, of November 2008.

     

    
      
        
          
            	CORP
      SECR: /s/ Amihay Lapid	 
      
	
                    North
      American Minerals Group Inc. Authorized signature

                  
	 
      
	/s/
      Timothy J. Bergen	 
      
	
                    Ice
      Resources Inc. Authorize
signature
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Federal Trade Commission 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

 

 Jennifer Milici 

 (202) 326-2912 

 jmilici@ftc.gov 

August 16, 2017 

Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins 

U.S. District Court 

Northern District of California 

Courtroom 7 – 4th Floor 

280 South 1st Street 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Re: Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220 

Dear Judge Cousins: 

We submit this letter and exhibits pursuant to the Court’s August 9, 2017 Order, ECF No. 155, 

regarding the parties’ Joint Discovery Letter Brief, ECF No. 152. 

Exhibit 1 is a privilege log identifying documents over which the Federal Trade Commission 

(“FTC”) is asserting the informant’s privilege. Over the past week, the FTC has subjected each 

document that it had provisionally identified as privileged to multiple rounds of additional 

review, and has undertaken to remove from the log duplicates and documents that can be 

produced without disclosing the identity of an informant. The FTC will produce non-privileged 

documents to Qualcomm. As explained during the August 9, 2017 hearing, the FTC is still 

reviewing documents for production and may identify additional documents protected by the 

informant’s privilege. 

Exhibit 2 is a supplemental letter from the European Commission Director-General for 

Competition opposing the production to Qualcomm of certain third-party responses to requests 

for information issued in ongoing antitrust proceedings against Qualcomm in Europe. 

We understand that the Korea Fair Trade Commission does not wish to make an additional 

submission to the Court. 

Sincerely, 

 /s/ Jennifer Milici 

Jennifer Milici 

Counsel for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 168 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 1
STATE of Louisiana v. Noe A. AGULIAR-BENITEZ aka Noe Aguilar-Benitez

NO. 2019-KO-0147

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
EXHIBIT 16.1



                        [LETTERHEAD OF BDO DUNWOODY, LLP]



December  21,  2001


United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
Division  of  Corporate  Finance
450  Fifth  Street,  N.W.
Washington,  D.C.  20549

To  Whom  It  May  Concern:

We  have  read  Item  8  of  the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
September  30,  2001,  of  Duro  Enzyme Products Inc. (the "Company") and are in
agreement  with  the  statements contained therein. We have no basis to agree or
disagree  with  other  statements  of  the Company contained in the Form 10-KSB.

Very  truly  yours,


/s/  BDO  Dunwoody,  LLP

BDO  Dunwoody


<PAGE>
Allan David COOPER v. STATE of Mississippi

2018-CT-00021-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: April 15, 2019 Closed: June 6, 2019

Motion Desc: Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
Adrian Maurice EZELL v. STATE

CR-16-0619

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018 Reh. denied March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CX5425 

REVISED REDACTED VERSION 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 2 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 3 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 4 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 5 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 6 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 7 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 8 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 9 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 10 of 11
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-5 Filed 01/14/19 Page 11 of 11
Jeffrey SUNDWALL, Appellant, v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1429

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 21, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 23, 2019

Jeffrey Sundwall, pro se, Appellant.

Brandy Elaine Elliott, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Rowe, Osterhaus, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Gary MIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-719

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 7, 2019

Gary Mixon, Milton, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The postconviction court's order summarily denying Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief is reversed because no court records were attached to the order. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5) ("If the [summary] denial is based on the records in the case, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the final order."). We remand for the court either to attach records to its order that conclusively refute Appellant's claims or to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his motion.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LAMBERT, HARRIS, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

1

We acknowledge that the order under review referenced portions of the record that were to be attached to the order showing that Appellant was not entitled to any relief. However, no records were actually attached to the order. We relinquished jurisdiction to allow the lower court the opportunity to attach those referenced records to an amended order, but no such amended order has been filed.
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00184-CV

MARIA SUAREZ, Appellant

V.

DOW CORNING CORPORATION, CHILI ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. 

CULLINGTON MD, FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, 

TOLBERT WILKINSON MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS FKA 

KNOLL INTERNATIONAL, MILTON ROWLEY MD, WESLEY 

WASHBURN MD, PRESTON J. CHANDLER MD, WILSHIRE FOAM 

PRODUCTS INC., ERNEST CRONIN MD, JAMES PETERSON MD, 

THOMAS D. CRONIN MD, FRANK J. GEROW MD, GENERAL 

ELECTRIC COMPANY, and DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1992-25394 EB

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order signed January 29, 2013. On March 27, 

2013, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 
2

P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher and McCally.