alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Gold Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

3.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4.  The information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all  material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 12, 2006

/s/ Tim Coupland
-------------------------------------------
Tim Coupland, Principal Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR CATHERINE Y. KIM

ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. / CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00359-WHA

DURIE TANGRI LLP

SONAL N. MEHTA (SBN 222086)

smehta@durietangri.com

LAURA E. MILLER (SBN 271713)

lmiller@durietangri.com

CATHERINE Y. KIM (SBN 308442)

ckim@durietangri.com

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415-362-6666

Facsimile: 415-236-6300

Attorneys for Defendant 

Facebook, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SIX4THREE, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v.

FACEBOOK, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00359-WHA

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR 

CATHERINE Y. KIM ON BEHALF OF 

DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.

Ctrm: 8, 19th Floor

Judge: Honorable William Alsup

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 8 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR CATHERINE Y. KIM

ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. / CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00359-WHA

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned of the law office of Durie Tangri LLP enters this 

Notice of Appearance for Catherine Y. Kim in the above-referenced action as counsel for Defendant 

Facebook, Inc. and hereby requests that all briefs, motions, orders, correspondence and other papers be 

served as follows:

DURIE TANGRI LLP

CATHERINE Y. KIM (SBN 308442)

217 Leidesdorff Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

Email: ckim@durietangri.com

Dated: January 25, 2017

By:

DURIE TANGRI LLP

/s/ Catherine Y. Kim

CATHERINE Y. KIM

Attorney for Defendant

Facebook, Inc.

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 8 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR CATHERINE Y. KIM

ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. / CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00359-WHA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 25, 2017 the within document was filed with the Clerk of the 

Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the attorneys of record in this case.

/s/ Catherine Y. Kim

CATHERINE Y. KIM

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 8 Filed 01/25/17 Page 3 of 3
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER GRANTING INTEL’S MOTION TO SEAL QX122

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No.17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING INTEL’S MOTION 

TO SEAL QX122

Re: Dkt. No. 1254

On December 31, 2018, the parties filed a joint administrative motion to seal portions of 

Qualcomm’s opposition to Bain’s motion to quash the trial subpoena to Christopher Johnson. ECF 

No. 1060. On January 8, 2019, the Court denied without prejudice the motion as to Byar’s 

Exhibits B, C, and E. ECF No. 1198. The Court ordered Bain or Intel to file motions to seal Byar’s 

Exhibits B, C, and E by January 11, 2019. Id. Before the Court is Intel’s motion to seal portions of 

Exhibit QX122, (Byar’s Exhibit C). ECF No. 1254. Applying the compelling reasons standard, the 

Court orders as follows:

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX122 ECF page 5 of 31, selected portions GRANTED.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1298 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER GRANTING INTEL’S MOTION TO SEAL QX122

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX122 ECF page 6, selected portions GRANTED.

QX122 ECF page 10, selected portions GRANTED.

QX122 ECF page 14, selected portions GRANTED.

QX122 ECF page 19, selected portions GRANTED.

QX122 ECF page 20, selected portions GRANTED.

QX122 ECF page 21, selected portions GRANTED.

QX122 ECF page 29, selected portions GRANTED.

QX122 ECF page 31, selected portions GRANTED.

The slides in Exhibit QX122 are only numbered through slide 16. For clarity, the Court 

refers to the ECF page numbers. Intel shall publicly file Exhibit QX122 consistent with this Order 

by Tuesday, January 15, 2019. Neither Bain nor Intel filed a motion requesting sealing of Exhibit 

B or Exhibit E to the Byar Declaration by January 11, 2019. See ECF No. 1198. Accordingly, 

Qualcomm shall publicly file unredacted versions of these exhibits by Monday, January 14, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1298 Filed 01/14/19 Page 2 of 2
# L_2017140EN.01000101.xml

| 31.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 140/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/921

of 15 May 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Charolais de Bourgogne (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Charolais de Bourgogne’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Charolais de Bourgogne’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Charolais de Bourgogne’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Charolais de Bourgogne’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Charolais de Bourgogne’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 May 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 33, 2.2.2017, p. 8.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 302 

Congratulating and honoring Argonne National Laboratory on 75 years of 

scientific excellence. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2021 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Mr. DURBIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating and honoring Argonne National Laboratory 

on 75 years of scientific excellence. 

Whereas, in 2021, Argonne National Laboratory celebrates 

the 75th anniversary of the date on which the Laboratory 

was chartered on July 1, 1946; 

Whereas Argonne National Laboratory accelerates science 

and technology by empowering pivotal discoveries, supporting innovative collaborations, and managing powerful 

facilities and tools, all of which help drive the prosperity 

and security of the United States; 

Whereas Argonne National Laboratory pioneered the peaceful 

use of nuclear energy starting in 1942, revolutionized 

medical diagnostic tools with the first ultrasound in 

1957, designed safer energy sources, such as the Integral 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 302 IS 

Fast Reactor in 1982, and drove electric vehicle development with the nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide cathode battery in 2001; 

Whereas Argonne National Laboratory manages for the Department of Energy 5 Office of Science user facilities and 

1 Office of Nuclear Energy facility, serving approximately 6,700 researchers from across the country and 

around the world; 

Whereas development of advanced energy storage technology 

at Argonne National Laboratory will assist the United 

States in achieving the goal of a carbon-neutral economy 

by 2050; 

Whereas Argonne National Laboratory will help maintain the 

scientific leadership of the United States with the upgrade of the Advanced Photon Source and installation of 

the Aurora exascale supercomputer; 

Whereas research of quantum information science at Argonne 

National Laboratory will increase communication advancements and create new economic and national security opportunities; 

Whereas domestic and international industry come to Argonne National Laboratory to collaborate with its diverse, 

world-class community of talent on cutting-edge science 

and technology; 

Whereas over 475 students annually pursue science, technology, engineering, and mathematics internships at Argonne National Laboratory, contributing to the next generation of scientists and engineers for the United States; 

and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 302 IS 

Whereas Argonne National Laboratory has a distinguished 

legacy of discovery upon which it continues to build future innovations: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates and honors Argonne National 

3 Laboratory on the 75th anniversary of its charter; 

4 and 

5 (2) wishes the Argonne National Laboratory 

6 continued success in helping the people of the 

7 United States unlock new scientific and techno8 logical frontiers that secure its energy future. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# m8524.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.8.2017 C(2017) 5965 final To the notifying party Subject : Case M. 8524 – ADVENT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION / INDUSTRIAL PARTS HOLDING Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 01 August 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Advent International Corporation (USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Industrial Parts Holding (France) by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - For Advent International Corporation: private equity investment, focused on the acquisition of equity stakes and the management of investment funds in various sectors, including business and financial services; industrial goods and services; retail operations, branded consumer goods, and leisure services; media, telecommunications, and information technology; and healthcare services and pharmaceuticals. - For Industrial Parts Holding: distribution of industrial parts by providing a logistic link between suppliers and customers in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain and Switzerland through ten autonomous commercial networks. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 259 , 09.8.2017 , p. 8 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134189 & (66) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134189 

 COA: 266096 

Saginaw CC: 04-024416-FC 

MOHAMMED HASSAN AL-KHALIL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED. 

CAVANAGH, J., would remand this case for an evidentiary hearing. 

d0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-31279

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANK G. PEARSON, also known as Grump,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:18-CR-121-1

Before WIENER, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Frank G. Pearson pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted 

felon. The presentence report (PSR) calculated an advisory sentencing range 

of 30 to 37 months. Pearson did not object but moved for a sentence below the 

range. Without opposition from the Government, the district court 

“reluctantly” granted Pearson’s motion, and the range was reduced to 24 to 30 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 17, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-31279 Document: 00515120595 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/17/2019
No. 18-31279

2

months. The court sentenced Pearson to 26 months in prison plus three years 

of supervised release. 

Pearson argues that the sentence was substantively unreasonable 

because a sentence of probation would have been sufficient. On appeal, we 

presume that a sentence below the properly calculated guideline range is 

substantively reasonable. See United States v. Murray, 648 F.3d 251, 258 (5th 

Cir. 2011); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Pearson’s 

assertion that the sentence is excessive does not rebut the presumption. See 

United States v. Ruiz, 621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010). The judgment is 

AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 18-31279 Document: 00515120595 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/17/2019
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stinger Systems, Inc., for the period
ended March 31, 2006;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ David J. MeadorDavid J. MeadorChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 18

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 23-33 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER -1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981)

SJSagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)

EGale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (SBN 268542)

JAngelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste 100

Roseville, CA 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 297-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff Osias Torion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OSIAS TORION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

EQUIFAX, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 4:17-cv-00422-PJH

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Osias Torion and defendant

Equifax, Inc. that Equifax, Inc. be dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs.

//

//

//

//

//

Case 4:17-cv-00422-PJH Document 33 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EQUIFAX, INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER -2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: June 14, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot Gale

Elliot Gale

Attorney for Plaintiff Osias Torion

DATED: June 14, 2017 Nokes & Quinn, APC

By: /s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr.

Thomas P. Quinn, Jr.

Attorney for Defendant Equifax, Inc.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Thomas P. Quinn, Jr. has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Equifax, Inc. is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:17-cv-00422-PJH Document 33 Filed 06/14/17 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned    officer of Novelis Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the    Company’s Transition Report on    Form 10-Q    for the period from January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007    (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company. /s/  Martha    Finn Brooks    Martha Finn Brooks    President and Chief Operating Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)     Date: June 27, 2007     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant    to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as    part of this report.