alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Eagle Resources Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ludvik Rolin, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 14, 2007

Ludvik Rolin/s/ Ludvik Rolin(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 3.4**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**V.I. TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

 

It is hereby certified that: 

 

1.    The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) is V.I. Technologies, Inc. 

 

2.    The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended to date, is hereby further amended bystriking out the first paragraph of Article FOURTH in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: 

 

“FOURTH. The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is sixty one million(61,000,000) shares, of which sixty million (60,000,000) shares will be shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), and one million (1,000,000) shares shall be shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 pershares (the “Preferred Stock”).” 

 

3.    The foregoing amendment was adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

 

4.    This Certificate of Amendment shall become effective at 5:00 p.m., local time, onMarch 10, 2003. 

 

Signed this 10th day of March, 2003.
Thaddeus T. HOWARD, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2858

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**
     Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the AnnualReport of on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc. (the“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2003,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certifies that: Based on myknowledge,
     (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ STEVEN W. SURBAUGH      Steven W. Surbaugh     Chief Financial Officer    
March 5, 2004
25
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Elizabeth Plaza,
        Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Manuel O. Morera, Chief Financial
        Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
        knowledge:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Elizabeth
                Plaza
              
              
              /s/ Manuel
                O.
                MoreraElizabeth
                Plaza
              
              
              Manuel
                O. MoreraChief
                  Executive Officer
              
              
              Chief
                  Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2007
 
 31
William Jason MEREDITH, DOC #I14650, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2975

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1 (b)
                             OPTION
                               ONE
                      MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                                

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, Option One
Mortgage Corporation has complied in all material respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP).  As of and for this same period, Option
One Mortgage Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond and errors
and omissions policy in the amount of $50 Million.


\s\Robert E. Durbrish   2/15/97        \s\William L. O'Neill   2/15/97
Robert E. Dubrish        Date             William L. O'Neill
Chief Executive Officer                   Chief Financial Officer
                                
\s\Jill Bright          2/15/97        
Jill Bright              Date
Controller
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7434** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. BILLY DEE WILLIAMS , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 3:04

- cr - 00296

- RJC

- CH

- 1; 3:09

- cv 00234

- RJC )

Submitted : February 10, 2011 Decided: February 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, S enior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Billy Dee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent i n this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Billy Dee Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabili ty. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sati sfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 ( 2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U .S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 385 

Supporting the designation of the week of September 19 through September 

25, 2021, as ‘‘Telehealth Awareness Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. WARNER, and Mrs. HYDE-SMITH) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of the week of September 19 

through September 25, 2021, as ‘‘Telehealth Awareness 

Week’’. 

Whereas telehealth allows a health care practitioner to furnish health care services to a patient or a practitioner at 

a different physical location than the health care practitioner; 

Whereas telehealth has played a significant role in supporting 

access to quality health care services for millions of patients during the COVID–19 public health emergency 

and will continue to be essential beyond the end of the 

public health emergency; 

Whereas following the unprecedented use of telehealth and 

virtual care services in response to the public health 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 385 ATS 

emergency, telehealth now represents a significant percent of care delivery, confirming the need to balance inperson and virtual care in the health care system; 

Whereas telehealth and virtual care services continue to provide patients and families with safe, appropriate, and 

high-quality care where and when they need it, and 91 

percent of Medicare beneficiaries are satisfied with their 

telehealth experiences; 

Whereas telehealth allows health care providers to securely 

connect with patients wherever they are when an in-person interaction is not clinically necessary or available and 

expands access to health care services for patients in 

need of specialty care, enabling the health care system to 

do more good for more people; 

Whereas telehealth is a bipartisan issue and Members of Congress from both sides of the political aisle and both sides 

of Capitol Hill are dedicated to ensuring patients continue to have the choice to access telehealth once the 

COVID–19 public health emergency ends; 

Whereas the United States must help improve broader access 

to telehealth services for all individuals, including members of rural and underserved communities; and 

Whereas ‘‘Telehealth Awareness Week’’ unites the efforts of 

patients, caregivers, health care providers, policymakers, 

and other stakeholders to advance the role of telehealth 

in health care: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation 

2 of the week of September 19 through September 25, 2021, 

3 as ‘‘Telehealth Awareness Week’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# m8685.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.12.2017 C(2017) 8684 final To the notifying par ties : Subject : Case M.8685 - FONCIERE DES REGIONS / MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL / LE MERIDIEN HOTEL IN NICE Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 13 November 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Foncière des Régions ("FDR", France) acquire s within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b ) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over Le Méridien Nice together with Starwood Hotels & Resor t s Worldwide, LLC ("Starwood", US A ) , an affiliate of Marriott International, Inc., which indirectly manages Le Méridien Nice on the basis of a management agreement . The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for FDR: French real estate investment group whose commercial assets portfolio mainly comprises offices, as well as residential assets and hotels. - for Starwood: wholly owned subsidiary of Marriott. Marriott is a diversified hospitality company which acts as a manager and franchisor of hotels and timeshares properties. As of year-end 2016, Marriott operated and franchised some 6,080 properties worldwide. - for Le Méridien Nice: 4-star hotel located in Nice. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
( S igned)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 393 , 21.11.2 017 , p. 13 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
# Career and Technical Education Month, 2025

Hardworking Americans are the backbone of our great Nation. Our workforce is the best in the world, and my Administration is dedicated to giving our students and workers the tools they need to succeed in a time where emerging technologies are advancing at an unprecedented pace. During Career and Technical Education Month, we reaffirm our belief in excellence by putting America first and investing in the best training and retraining opportunities that will result in a stronger workforce and a booming economy.

Under my leadership, America will once again champion a culture where hard work is rewarded and equip our people with real skills for real careers that our communities are in desperate need to fill. During my first term, I proudly signed the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act, which provided millions of students with excellent vocational opportunities. And we saw unparalleled growth and economic development, empowering students and workers to undertake new high-wage careers, especially in science, technology, and engineering. We will make technology work for Americans, not Americans for technology.

America is well-positioned at the forefront of innovation and entrepreneurship, and our history of ingenuity and grit is unrivaled. Over the next 4 years, we will rebuild our economy, raise wages, and strengthen families. My Administration will invest in the next generation and expand access to high-quality career and technical education for all Americans. We will unleash the enormous potential of the American people and provide students and workers with the necessary skills training to ensure that our Nation dominates the 21st century.

This February, we celebrate our incredible workers who are making America bigger, better, and more beautiful than ever before. By offering more alternatives to higher education, we will train college-aged kids in relevant skills for the 21st century economy. We will put America first, invest in our people, and lead the world into a new golden age.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim February 2025 as Career and Technical Education Month.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-ninth.

[FR Doc. 2025-02404

Billing code 3395-F4-P
Roy W. THOMAS, DOC #C07487, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3477

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

         Our consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of the
periods indicated is set forth below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                 Three Months
                                             Ended
                                         March 31, 2007                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                         --------------     ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               2006         2005          2004          2003        2002
                                         --------------     ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------  -----------
                                                                                       (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                     <C>                 <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>

FIXED CHARGES:
     Interest costs                       $    3,377        $   13,620   $    6,766   $    6,711    $    4,692    $    5,942
     Capitalized interest                         --                --           --          260         1,558            --
                                          -------------     ----------   ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------
         Total fixed charges              $    3,377        $   13,620   $    6,766        6,971         6,250         5,942
                                          =============     ==========   ==========   ==========    ==========    ==========

EARNINGS:
     Net income                           $    3,849        $   21,464   $   21,913   $   20,351    $    5,913    $    5,769
     Add fixed charges per above               3,377            13,620        6,766        6,971         6,250         5,942
     Less capitalized interest per above          --                --           --         (260)       (1,558)           --
                                          -------------     ----------   ----------   ----------    ----------    ----------
         Total earnings, as adjusted      $    7,226        $   35,084   $   28,679   $   27,062    $   10,605    $   11,711
                                          =============     ==========   ==========   ==========    ==========    ==========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES              2.14              2.58         4.24         3.88          1.70          1.97
</TABLE>
Roberto DUGGANS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2512

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

Roberto Duggans, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, LINDSEY and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, J.

*1119Appellant seeks review of the trial court's denial of his "Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence," filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On November 9, 2018, in accordance with the mailbox rule, appellant filed his relevant notice of appeal.1 The notice of appeal incorrectly states the lower court rendered the order appealed on October 10, 2018. Applying Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h),2 we determine the lower court rendered the order under appeal on September 28, 2018, as the trial court's signed, written order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence was filed with the lower court clerk on that date. We reach this conclusion based on the lower court clerk's filing stamp, dated September 28, 2018.

Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order, this court is without appellate jurisdiction. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b) ; *see also* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(k). Thus, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice for the filing of a petition for belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). *See, e.g.*, *Watkins v. State*, 217 So.3d 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Dismissed.

1

The mailbox rule provides a motion, petition, or notice of appeal is deemed "filed" when an inmate places it in the hands of prison officials. *Haag v. State*, 591 So.2d 614, 617 (Fla. 1992). As articulated in *Thompson v. State*, 761 So.2d 324, 326 (Fla. 2000), we presume timeliness, of the filing of a legal document submitted by an inmate, according to the date contained in the certificate of service, if any, showing that the pleading was placed in the hands of prison or jail officials for mailing on that date, *provided said date is on or before the filing deadline.*

2

Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(h) - **Rendition (of an Order).** An order is rendered when a signed, written order is filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal. *See**In re Amendments to the Fla. R. App P.*, 256 So.3d 1218 (Fla. 2018) (adopting amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, relettering subdivision (i) of rule 9.020 to (h) ); *see also**Guy v. Plaza Home Mortg., Inc.,*260 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).
Garey R. NEHRKE and Margaret Nehrke, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK and Leisureville Community Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-2368

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO 

EXTEND DEADLINE PURSUANT TO 

LOCAL RULE 79-5

Re: Dkt. No. 823

The Court DENIES the stipulation to extend the deadline pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-

5. ECF No. 823.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 7, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 824 Filed 09/07/18 Page 1 of 1