alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 12, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02507]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-6-2025]

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 7; Notification of Proposed Production 
Activity; Lilly del Caribe, Inc.; (Pharmaceutical Products); Carolina, 
Puerto Rico

    Lilly del Caribe, Inc. submitted a notification of proposed 
production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facility in 
Carolina, Puerto Rico, within Subzone 7K. The notification conforming 
to the requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was 
received on January 30, 2025.
    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be 
limited to the specific foreign-status material(s)/component(s) and 
specific finished product(s) described in the submitted notification 
(summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The 
benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ 
procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's 
website--accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. The proposed finished 
product and material(s)/component(s) would be added to the production 
authority that the Board previously approved for the operation, as 
reflected on the Board's website.
    The proposed finished product is finished orforglipron dosage form 
(duty free).
    The proposed foreign-status materials/components include 
orforglipron active ingredient and orforglipron SDD (spray dried 
dispersion) (duty rate is duty-free or 6.5%). Certain materials/
components are subject to duties under Section 1702(a)(1)(B) of the 
International Emergency Economic Powers Act, depending on the country 
of origin. The applicable section 1702 decision requires subject 
merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 
146.41).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
[email protected]. The closing period for their receipt is March 24, 2025.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information System'' section of the Board's 
website.
    For further information, contact Diane Finver at 
[email protected].

    Dated: February 6, 2025.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-02507 Filed 2-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION BY GERALD A. LOMBARDO


PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a),


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gerald A. Lombardo, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Ditech Holding Corporation; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


/s/ Gerald A. LombardoGerald A. LombardoChief Financial OfficerDate: May 13, 2019
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2014-2





The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2014 (as amended and supplemented, or
otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2014-2, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting
Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer
this 30th day of March, 2016.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName: Nathan SteuberTitle: Vice President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BMW OF NORTH AMERICA LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

K VIP AUTO BODY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00543-SK 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On October 30, 2017, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment without 

prejudice to refiling a motion that addresses the deficiencies noted by the Court. More than three 

months have passed, and Plaintiffs have not filed any revised motion for default judgment. 

Therefore, the Court issues an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”) why this case should not be 

dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Plaintiffs shall respond in writing by no later than February 20, 2018. Plaintiffs are 

admonished that if they fail to file a response to this OSC by February 20, 2018, the Court will 

reassign this matter and issue a report and recommendation that this matter be dismissed for 

failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 8, 2018

______________________________________

SALLIE KIM

United States Magistrate Judge
# C_2018409EN.01000101.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/1

---

Joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission relating to Regulation (EU) 2018/1671 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/825 to increase the financial envelope of the Structrual Reform Support Programme and adapt its general objective (1)

(2018/C 409/01)

As regards financing the increase of the financial envelope for the Structural Reform Support Programme and without prejudice to the powers of the budgetary authority, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission have agreed as follows:

| 1. | EUR 40 million will be financed through the budget line of the SRSP located in Heading 1b (13.08.01) of the MFF (Economic, social and territorial cohesion) by mobilising the Global margin for commitments in accordance with Article 14 of the MFF Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 in the framework of the budgetary procedure pursuant to Article 314 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

EUR 40 million will be financed through the budget line of the SRSP located in Heading 1b (13.08.01) of the MFF (Economic, social and territorial cohesion) by mobilising the Global margin for commitments in accordance with Article 14 of the MFF Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 in the framework of the budgetary procedure pursuant to Article 314 TFEU;

| 2. | EUR 40 million will be financed through the budget line of the SRSP located in Heading 2 (13.08.02) of the MFF (Sustainable Growth: Natural Resources) by redeployments other than technical assistance and Rural Development within this Heading and without having recourse to the margins. The exact sources for such redeployments will be further specified in due course having regard to the negotiations of the budgetary procedure for the 2019 budget. |
| --- | --- |

2.

EUR 40 million will be financed through the budget line of the SRSP located in Heading 2 (13.08.02) of the MFF (Sustainable Growth: Natural Resources) by redeployments other than technical assistance and Rural Development within this Heading and without having recourse to the margins. The exact sources for such redeployments will be further specified in due course having regard to the negotiations of the budgetary procedure for the 2019 budget.

Statement by the Commission

The Commission will identify and propose redeployments of EUR 40 million in Heading 2 of the MFF (Sustainable Growth: Natural Resources) in the amending letter to the draft general budget 2019.

The Commission intends to propose the mobilisation of the Global Margin for Commitments in accordance with Article 14 of the MFF Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 in the framework of the budgetary procedure for 2020 pursuant to Article 314 TFEU.

---

(1)  OJ L 284, 12.11.2018, p. 3.

---
Omar FELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2819

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
s

678

V.

Equifax, Inc., et al.

) ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY) PRO HAC VICE

) (CML LOCAL RULE 11-3)))

Defendant(s).

9

10

11

12

1, Christopher A. Ferguson , an active member in good standing of the bar of

Indjana Supreme Courf , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the

Northern District of California representing: Trans Unjoni LLC in the

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is DaVjd Streza, Esq. tanattorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office

within the State of California.

1314

1516

17

1819

2021

22

My ADDRESS op RECORD: LOCAL co-courqsb?'s ADDRESS op RECORD:

Schuckit & Associates, p.c., 4545 Northwestern i Vogl Meredith Burke, LLP, 456 Montgomery

Drive, Zionsville, IN 46077 i Street, 20th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104

My TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: l LOCAL CO-COUNSEL"S 'r'sr'spnoxp # OF RECORD: ???(317)363-2400 ???? ? ?I(415)398-0200

My EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:

cferguson@schuckitlaw.com l LOCAL co-cousshr"s EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: dstreza@vmbllp.com

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: 27833-49

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said

bar is attached to this application.

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules.

I declare utxder pergalty of perjury that the foregoitxg is true and correct.

Christopher A. Ferguson B

APPLICANT

Dated: 02/07/17

2324

25

2627

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of Cmlsfopner A. Ferguson is granted,

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counseldesignated in the application will constitute notice to the party.

28 Dated:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER ()cr i.'b{I '?? 2().'l. 2

February 9, 2017
., . d

? [z.l?iij 6

girt-s

Certification

STATE OF INDIANA, SS:

I, Gregory R. Pachmayr, Clerk of the Supreme Court

of Indiana, do hereby certify that

CHRISTOPHER AARON FER(,USON

is a member of the bar of said Court since admission on

October 17, 2008 , and is in good standing therein.

Given under my hand and the seal of said Court at

Indianapolis,Indiana,this iach dayof october ,20?-

,s,.., g,:?

GREGORY R. PACHMAYR

CLERK, SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA
Yosvani TORRES, Petitioner, v. Mark INCH, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 3D19-0402

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 03, 2019

Yosvani Torres, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for respondent, the State of Florida.

Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER J.

Yosvani Torres petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective *432assistance of appellate counsel. We dismiss the petition as untimely pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d)(5).

In 2009, Torres was convicted and sentenced for two counts of capital sexual battery, and was duly sentenced. We affirmed his conviction and sentence on direct review in *Torres v. State*, 54 So.3d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). On February 4, 2011, the mandate issued and Torres's judgment and sentence became final.

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d)(5) provides:

> A petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on direct review shall not be filed more than 2 years after the judgment and sentence become final on direct review unless it alleges under oath with a specific factual basis that the petitioner was affirmatively misled about the results of the appeal by counsel. In no case shall a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on direct review be filed more than 4 years after the judgment and sentence become final on direct review.

As Torres filed the instant habeas corpus petition on February 27, 2019, more than eight years after his judgment and sentence became final, we dismiss the petition as procedurally barred under rule 9.141(d)(5). *See* *Mendoza v. State*, 224 So.3d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; *see also* *Burroughs v. State*, 65 So.3d 1175 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) ; *Chance v. State*, 65 So.3d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
EX PARTE Joel CALDWELL

CR-17-0118

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Exhibit
10.3
  VirtualScopics,
Inc. 2009 Bonus Plan
  On
January 27, 2009, the Registrant’s Compensation Committee approved the terms of
the Registrant’s 2009 Bonus Plan (“Plan”). The Plan covers the Registrant’s
Chief Executive Officer, management employees including the Chief Business and
Financial Officer, and other employees.
 
 The Plan
provides performance criteria based upon the Registrant meeting certain
financial and operational targets in the 2009 fiscal year, and require the
Registrant to achieve improved financial performance over fiscal
2008.  If the Registrant’s performance meets or exceeds the staged
targets in the Plan, the participating executive may receive cash incentive
bonus payments equal to a percentage of the executive’s eligible base
pay.  Amounts may be further adjusted by the Compensation Committee
for exceptional individual performance.  The bonus percentage range is
0% to 30% of eligible base pay for the chief executive officer, and 0% to 22%
for the chief business and financial officer.  The executive officers
are not eligible for a bonus unless the Registrant meets the initial performance
thresholds.  The Plan also includes a bonus pool to employees other
than the executive officers.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Partners Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, James S. Weaver, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ James S. Weaver                                  
|                     |  |     |  | James S. Weaver, President andChief Executive Officer
Case 3:17-cr-00044-VC Document 12 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

S. ALFARO, Associate Director of CDCR; 

et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-16205 

D.C. No. 1:17-cv-01310-AWI-JLT 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner John Wesley Williams appeals pro se from the 

district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1168 (9th Cir. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-16205 

2014) (en banc). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Williams

failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and failed to raise a genuine dispute 

of material fact as to whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable. 

See Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 635, 638, 641-44 (2016) (explaining that an 

inmate must exhaust such administrative remedies as are available before filing an 

action, and describing limited circumstances in which administrative remedies are 

unavailable); Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion of 

administrative remedies . . . means using all steps that the agency holds out, and 

doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (citation 

and internal quotation marks omitted)); Albino, 747 F.3d at 1172 (explaining that 

once the defendant has carried the burden to prove that there was an available 

administrative remedy, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to produce evidence 

showing that administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to him).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Williams’s request 

to stay summary judgment pending additional discovery because Williams failed to 

show that the discovery he sought was essential to oppose summary judgment. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d); Midbrook Flowerbulbs Holland B.V. v. Holland Am. Bulb 

Farms, Inc., 874 F.3d 604, 614, 619-20 (9th Cir. 2017) (standard of review, and 

explaining that to prevail on a Rule 56(d) request, a party must state the specific 
3 20-16205 

facts it seeks in further discovery, and show that such facts exist and are “essential 

to oppose summary judgment” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHIRON CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

    v.

SOURCECF INC., SOURCECF CLINICALRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.,MAXOR NATIONAL PHARMACYSERVICES CORPORATION d/b/a IVSOLUTIONS, FOUNDATION CARE L.L.C.,and PHARMACEUTICAL SPECIALTIES,INC.,

Defendant.                                                                           /

No. C 05-01938 WHA

ORDER DENYINGSTIPULATION TOCONTINUE CASEMANAGEMENTCONFERENCE

The parties’ stipulation to continue the case management conference, presently set for

July 14, 2005, is DENIED.  Please submit a joint case management conference statement at least

SEVEN DAYS PRIOR to the conference.  

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  July 8, 2005.                                                               WILLIAM ALSUPUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-01938-WHA   Document 14   Filed 07/08/05   Page 1 of 1
# L_2017035EN.01001201.xml

| 10.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 35/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 35/12

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/229

of 9 February 2017

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Traditionally Reared Pedigree Welsh Pork (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Traditionally Reared Pedigree Welsh Pork’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Traditionally Reared Pedigree Welsh Pork’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Traditionally Reared Pedigree Welsh Pork’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Traditionally Reared Pedigree Welsh Pork’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Traditionally Reared Pedigree Welsh Pork’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. — Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 February 2017.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 382, 15.10.2016, p. 19.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---