alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brenda G. Gujral, president of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |        |  |                     
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | --------------------
|Date: May 13, 2011 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Brenda G. Gujral
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Brenda G. Gujral    
|                   |  | Title: |  | President           

This certification accompanies the Report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3464

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Ignacio Carrera-Marino, also known as * Judas Lozano, also known as Chivo, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 27, 2006 Filed: October 4, 2006

___________ Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ignacio Carrera-Marino (Marino) appeals the 120-month prison sentence imposed by the district court 1 after Marino pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with the intent to distri bute 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1), and 846. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v.-2- California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that Marino believes the sentence is unreasonable.
Marino’s offense carried a statutor y mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Because Marino had more than one criminal history point, he was in eligible for safety-valve relief from the statutory minimum sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1). Thus, Marino’s sentence is not unreasonable because the district court had no authority to impose a lower sentence. See United States v. Chacon , 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir. 2003) (only authority for district court to depart fro m statutory minimum sentence is found in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and (f), wh ich apply only when government makes a motion for substantial assistance or defendant qualifies for safety-valve relief). Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Derek Ward, the President, Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Empirical Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the year ended September 30, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Derek WardName:Derek WardTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:November 23, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Anthony Edward NERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2500

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 31, 2019

Anthony Edward Nero, Sneads, pro se.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant's convictions and sentences without discussion, but we remand with instructions to reduce the misdemeanor sentences in counts one, three, and four to writing. *See**Giordano v. State*, 32 So. 3d. 96, 98 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (remanding with instructions to issue written sentence to reflect time-served sentence on misdemeanor).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with Instructions.

EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and SASSO, JJ., concur.
David J. BALLINGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3078

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 7, 2019

David J. Ballinger, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED without prejudice to appellant's right to file a petition for a writ of mandamus in the circuit court. *See**Rood v. State* , 790 So. 2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with Arlington Tankers Ltd.’s (the “Company”) quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thethree months ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Arthur L. Regan, President and Co-Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and Edward Terino, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, each herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to our knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.        Date:  November 9, 2006 /s/ Arthur L. Regan   Name:  Arthur L. Regan   Title:  President and Co-Chief Executive Officer           Date:  November 9, 2006 /s/  Edward Terino   Name:  Edward Terino  Title:  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**Exhibit 10.1 toHiland Partners, LP 1st Quarter 2009 10-Q**

 

**Compensation of ConflictsCommittee Members in Connection with Going Private Proposal**

 

OnFebruary 19, 2009, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Hiland PartnersGP, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Partners, LP  (the “Partnership”), authorized the ConflictsCommittee of the Board (the “Conflicts Committee”) to consider and respond to aproposal made by Harold Hamm, whereby Mr. Hamm and certain of hisaffiliates would acquire all of the outstanding common units of the Partnershipthat are not owned by Mr. Hamm, his affiliates or the Hamm family trusts(the “Proposal”).  The ConflictsCommittee is composed of two independent directors, John T. McNabb, II andShelby E. Odell. On February 19, 2009, the Board determined that, forservice on the Conflicts Committee in connection with the Conflicts Committee’sconsideration of the Proposal, all members of the Conflicts Committee willreceive a one-time fee of $30,000, in lieu of the prior arrangement of $1,000per meeting. No additional fees are expected to be paid to the members of theConflicts Committee for attending meetings of the Conflicts Committee duringthe time period in which the Conflicts Committee is considering the Proposal. Thefees payable to the members of the Conflicts Committee are in addition to theannual fees received by such directors for their services as a member of thePartnership’s Board and other committees thereof.

 

----
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00099

- CV

In the Interest of A.P. and B.P.,

children §

§

§

§ From the 325th District Court

o f Tarrant Co unty (325

- 530796

- 13 )

August 2 8 , 2014

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SE COND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1

CR 17-00040 RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)

United States Attorney

BARBARA J. VALLIERE (DCBN 439353)

Chief, Criminal Division

KAREN KREUZKAMP (CABN 246151)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-7014

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Email: Karen.Kreuzkamp@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARC CHRISTOPHER BROCKHAUS,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR 17-00040 RS

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

DATE; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters this 

order vacating the currently scheduled sentencing date of November 27, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. and re-setting 

sentencing for January 22, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. The parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as 

follows:

1. The defendant is currently out of custody. 

2. This matter is currently set for sentencing on November 27, 2018.

3. While the parties are in receipt of a draft presentence report from the United States Probation 

Office, the officer who prepared the report has left that office and the case has been reassigned to a new 

officer. The new officer is becoming familiar with the draft report and is working through the objections 
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 2

CR 17-00040 RS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

made by defense counsel.

4. The parties jointly request that the sentencing date be continued to allow the newly assigned 

Probation Officer time to resolve the objections. 

5. The Probation Officer is available on January 22, 2019.

6. Accordingly, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court:

(1) sets a sentencing date of January 22, 2019, at 2:30 p.m.; and

(2) vacates the currently-scheduled sentencing date of November 27, 2018.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: November 14, 2018 ALEX G. TSE

United States Attorney

/s/

KAREN KREUZKAMP

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: November 14, 2018

/s/

JONATHAN MCDOUGALL

Counsel for the Defendant

Based upon the above Stipulation, and for good cause appearing, THE COURT ORDERS THAT 

the sentencing date of November 27, 2018 at 2:30 p.m., be re-set to January 22, 2019 at 2:30 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

11/14/18
EXHIBIT 35.1

Servicer Compliance Certificate

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2013-1





The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Fifth Third Bank (Fifth Third), an Ohio banking corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2013 (as amended and supplemented,
or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Servicing Agreement), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2013-1, the Servicer and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting
Period), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Signature Page Follows]



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer
this 30th day of March, 2016.



FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:

/s/ Nathan SteuberName:

Nathan SteuberTitle:

Vice President
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 453 

Designating November 17, 2021, as ‘‘National Butter Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2021 

Ms. SMITH (for herself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 17, 2021, as ‘‘National Butter Day’’. 

Whereas, around the world, butter can be found in cuisines 

of every culture, each of which use butter to enhance recipes and enrich lives; 

Whereas butter has been on the dinner table for individuals 

for hundreds of years; 

Whereas butter has served as a staple for family recipes that 

have been passed down for generations; 

Whereas the average individual in the United States eats 6.3 

pounds, or about 25 sticks, of cow’s butter each year; 

Whereas butter sculptures have been used to celebrate scenes 

and individuals from across the United States since the 

19th century; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 453 IS 

Whereas butter is the crucial ingredient in mouth-watering 

sauces, rich cookies, creamy mashed potatoes, hearty casseroles, and much more; 

Whereas butter producers, processors, and dealers have always ensured that butter was available for cooks across 

the United States; and 

Whereas butter has improved the meals that have brought 

families and friends together: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates November 17, 2021, as ‘‘Na3 tional Butter Day’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to celebrate National Butter Day with their favorite 

6 buttery dishes and baked goods. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
CONTINUUM TH9 LLC, Appellant, v. MMT FLA INVESTMENTS LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1489

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(A) AND 15d-14(A)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Solar Enertech Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness
of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report
any change in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small
business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and




---



##### 



5.
    
    The small business issuers other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business
issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 2, 2007
    
    By: /s/ Ming Wai Anthea ChungMing Wai Anthea ChungChief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZAMEER RIAZ AZAM,

Plaintiff,

 v.

OFFICER M. JOHNSON et al,

Defendant. /

No. CV 05-01858 MHP

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

(X) Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues

have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

() Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of

defendants, and that plaintiff takes nothing in this action.

Dated: 3/12/2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Anthony W Bowser

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:05-cv-01858-MHP Document 132 Filed 03/12/09 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

              Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nancy S. Wise,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                   /s/ Nancy S. Wise
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Nancy S. Wise
                                                   Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

                                                   March 12, 2009

         This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
|   | (1) |  the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2) |  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                                |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|  Date: September 16, 2010 | /s/ David M. Daniels                                |
|                           | David M. Daniels                                    |
|                           | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                           |                                                |

----