alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 24 (Thursday, February 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02272]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 29, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
607 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1162, K2025-1162.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-02272 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
<PAGE>
Computation of Ratios                                               Exhibit 12.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Calculation of Earnings:                                                         2002          2001          2000
------------------------                                                         ----          ----          ----
                <S>                                                             <C>             <C>         <C>
          Income from continuing operations before income taxes, minority
            interest and gain on sale of assets and other provisions, net       20,697        12,305        17,283
          Less:  Equity in earnings                                             (3,138)       (3,653)       (1,251)
          Add:  Gain on sale of assets and other provisions, before tax         (1,009)       (7,435)       24,921
                                                                                -----------------------------------
          Income from continuing operations before income taxes, adjustments
            for minority interest and income from equity investees              16,550         1,217        40,953

          Additions:
            Fixed Charges
               Interest Expense                                                 14,628        19,185        26,213
               Capitalized Interest                                                196           762         2,341
                                                                                ----------------------------------
                                                                                14,824        19,947        28,554


          (1)  Amortization of capitalized interest                                417           413           394
          (2)  Distributed income of equity investees                            3,138         3,653         1,251

               Subtractions:
                 Capitalized Interest                                             (196)         (762)       (2,341)
                                                                                -----------------------------------
               Adjusted Earnings                                                34,733        24,468        68,811
                                                                                -----------------------------------
               Fixed Charges (from above)                                       14,824        19,947        28,554

               Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                 2.34          1.23          2.41

</TABLE>

          (1)  Represents an estimate of capitalized interest costs based on the
               Partnership's established depreciation policy and an analysis of
               interest costs capitalized since 1996 (the year in which
               CarrAmerica Realty, L.P. began significant development activity).

          (2)  Represents an estimate of distributed income.  Amount is based
               upon equity in earnings for each period due to the fact that
               distributions exceeded equity in earnings for each period.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

REISENHOOVER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00326-NJV (JD)

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The case was dismissed and closed after plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 

was denied and he failed to pay the filing fee. The case was previously assigned to Magistrate 

Judge Vadas who has retired and the undersigned received plaintiff’s motion as general duty 

judge. Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to amend his appeal and to vacate the order dismissing 

the case because the case was dismissed by a Magistrate Judge who did not have full consent of 

the parties under Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017). It is hereby ordered that:

1. This case is REOPENED.

2. Plaintiff may file additional objections and briefing within fourteen (14) days

explaining why the Magistrate Judge’s Order was erroneous.

3. The Clerk shall randomly REASSIGN this case to a District Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 17, 2018

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

REISENHOOVER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00326-NJV (JD)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on January 17, 2018, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by 

placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery 

receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Marvin Glenn Hollis ID: E-37508

CSP - Los Angeles County Facility D, Building 3, Bed 140

P.O. Box 8457

Lancaster, CA 93539 

Dated: January 17, 2018

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

By:________________________

LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the 

Honorable JAMES DONATO
John STEVENSON, Appellant, v. Karen L. STEVENSON, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3205

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Hector LOPEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2623

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019.

Hector Lopez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

*ON PARTIAL CONFESSION OF ERROR*

PER CURIAM.

Hector Lopez, the defendant below, appeals an order summarily denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion for correction of jail credit. Lopez's motion is facially insufficient because the motion is not under oath and otherwise fails to contain the contents required by rule 3.801(c). As the State properly and commendably concedes, however, the trial court erred by denying Lopez's motion without giving him leave to amend the motion. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(e) (incorporating the amendment procedure under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f)(2) for timely but facially insufficient post-conviction motions); *Belanger v. State*, 146 So.3d 136, 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). Accordingly, we reverse the order under review to allow Lopez to file a facially sufficient rule 3.801 motion within sixty days of the issuance of this Court's mandate. *See**Belanger*, 146 So.3d at 137.

Reversed.
Russell Thomas TAYLOR, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-0586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 16, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 15, 2019

Affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1    Certification of the Chairman pursuant to
Rule 13(a)  14 (b)



Certification



Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Sinopec Beijing Yanhua Petrochemical Company Limited (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Exchange Act and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------
|Dated: June 16, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /S/ Du Guosheng
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Du Guosheng    
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chairman       



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Nor will it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference.
Derk L. ALLABEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, W. Bradley Blair, II, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GTA-IB, LLC;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| November 14, 2006 |     | /s/ W. Bradley Blair, II           |     |     |
|-------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------|----------|----------|
|              |     | W. Bradley Blair, II               | * * | * * |
|              | * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* | * * | * * |

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.4



|     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                    
|---- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |  | 20 William Street, Suite 310 Wellesley, MA
02481 781-304-1800 phone 781-304-1701 fax www.stream.com

December 29, 2008

Mr. R. Scott Murray

Stream Global Services, Inc.

20 William Street, Suite 310

Wellesley, MA 02481

Dear Scott:

To ensure compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, Stream Global
Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), and you hereby agree to amend the employment agreement dated as of July 15, 2008 by and between the Company and you (the Agreement) as follows:

Section 10(c) is amended by inserting at the end the following:

This Section 10(c) will, among other sections, apply to payments and reimbursements of expenses under Sections 3.3, 3.6, 3.7 and 9.

The Company will pay or reimburse business expenses in accordance with its policies but, assuming proper substantiation, no later than the last day of the
calendar year following the calendar year in which the relevant expense was incurred.

The parties further agree that Section 3.2 of the
Agreement is amended to replace the $60 million Adjusted EBITDA target for earning a bonus at the full target level for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 with a $50 million Adjusted EBITDA target. This section is further amended such
that, if the Company achieves between 80% and 100% of its target Adjusted EBITDA, the Executive shall receive a pro rata portion (from 0-100%) of his target bonus.

Except as modified by this letter or by other intervening amendments, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This letter may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same document.



STREAM GLOBAL SERVICE, INC.By:

/s/    Sheila M. FlahertySheila M. FlahertyChief Legal and Administrative Officer




|                        
|------------------------
|Acknowledged and agreed:
|                        
|/s/    R. Scott Murray  
|R. Scott Murray         

12-29-08

Date
Order issued January 17, 2013 

In The 

Qtnurt of Appeals 

Etft}f ilistrid nf <1Je.xas at ilallas 

No. 05-12-00283-CR 

DERRICK DEON CHR.ISTOR, AppeUant 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, AppeUee 

ORDER 

Before Justices FitzGerald, Fillmore, and Evans 

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, we GRANT the September 5, 2012 motion of 

Riann C. Moore for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk 

of the Court to remove Riann C. Moore as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the 

Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to Derrick Deon 

Christor, No. 1766384, Ware Transfer Facility, 1681 South FM 3525, Colorado City, Texas, 

79512.
Brian S. ROMINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2694

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jimmy Lee WARD, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3679

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 28, 2019

Jimmy L. Ward, III, Monticello, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court's summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.850. We affirm the trial court's summary denial of grounds two and three without further discussion. In ground one, Appellant alleges that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the jurors seeing him in handcuffs during the trial. We find that this first ground was facially sufficient. *See**Jones v. State*, 998 So. 2d 573, 588 (Fla. 2008) (stating postconviction claim alleging trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to defendant being in restraints must specifically allege jury saw restraints). Because the record does not conclusively refute whether any jurors saw Appellant in handcuffs, we reverse and remand to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or to attach records conclusively refuting the claim. *See, e.g.*, *Way v. State*, 41 So. 3d 425 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ; *Torres v. State*, 9 So. 3d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ; *Jensen v. State*, 964 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ; *Miller v. State*, 852 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED in Part; REVERSED in Part; REMANDED with Instructions

ORFINGER, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
STATE of Louisiana v. Shannon ALEXANDER

NO. 2018-KH-1185

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied. Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State v. Alexander, 18-0267 (La. 12/17/18), 259 So.3d 336.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 732

_____________________________ A SHLEY L L ESTER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John Jay Gontarek , Judge

. September 22, 2020

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , N ORDBY , and L ONG , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARUNEE RYLES,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

PALACE HOTEL,

Defendant(s). /

No. C-04-5326 SBA (MEJ)

NOTICE AND ORDER RESCHEDULING

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

TO ALL PARTIES and their Attorneys of Record:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case per Judge Armstrong's order has been rescheduled

for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. The Settlement

Conference shall take place on July 31, 2006 at 2:00 p.m. in Judge James’ chambers, located at

the Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, San Francisco, California 94102. On

the date of the settlement conference, counsel and parties shall use the telephone adjacent to

chambers' security entrance to notify the Court of their arrival. The parties shall notify the Court if

the matter has settled or been dismissed before the date of the conference.

Settlement Conference statements shall be submitted in accordance with Magistrate Judge

James' STANDING ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCEDURES, a copy of

which may be obtained from the Northern District of California's website at 

Case 4:04-cv-05326-SBA Document 21 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. From the homepage, click on the "Judges" tab on the left margin,

then choose Magistrate Judge James.

When filing papers that require the Court to take any action (e.g. motions, calendaring issues,

administrative requests or a request to be excused from attendance), the parties shall, in addition to

filing papers electronically, lodge with chambers a printed copy of the papers by the close of the

next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. These printed copies shall be

marked “Chambers Copy” and shall be submitted to the Clerk’s Office, in an envelope clearly

marked with Judge James’ name, case number and “E-Filing Chambers Copy.” Parties shall not file

a paper copy of any document with the Clerk’s Office that has already been filed electronically. 

Any proposed orders must also be emailed to: mejpo@cand.uscourts.gov

Please contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Brenda Tolbert, at (415) 522-4708 with any

questions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2006 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:04-cv-05326-SBA Document 21 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 2
[Proposed] Order Dismissing Case Without Prejudice – 4:17-cv-00193-EMC

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Peter A. Arhangelsky (SBN 291325)

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

2730 S. Val Vista Dr.

Bldg. 6, Ste. 133

Gilbert, AZ 85295

P: (602) 388-8899

F: (602) 393-4361

E: parhangelsky@emord.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff Youngevity International Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

YOUNGEVITY INTERNATIONAL 

CORP.

 Plaintiff,

v.

WAKAYA PERFECTION, LLC; TODD 

SMITH

 Defendants.

Case No. 4:17-cv-00193-EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING 

CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Judge: Edward M. Chen 

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice,

hereby DISMISSES THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. 

Proc. 41(a)(1).

DATED: ______________________, 2017.

_____________________

Hon. Edward M. Chen

United States District Judge

Northern District of California

Case 3:17-cv-00193-EMC Document 25-3 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 1

3/7

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:17-cv-00193-EMC Document 26 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 1