alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

 

Sarbanes - Oxley Section 302 Certification

 
| I, James J. Judge, certify that: |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |
| 1.                     | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BEC Funding II, LLC (the Registrant) and other reports containing distribution information for the period covered by the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
| 2.                     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3.                     | Based on my knowledge, the financial information required to be provided to the trustee under the governing documents of the issuer is included in these reports; and |
| 4.                     | Based on my knowledge, Boston Edison Company, the Servicer, has complied with its servicing obligations and minimum servicing standards. |
|  

                    |   |

 
|                                                                                                                                                            |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 4, 2005                       |   By:   | /s/ JAMES J. JUDGE                       |
|                                                                                                                                                            |                        | James J. Judge                                                                                                                                         |
|                                                                                                                                                            |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |   | Senior Vice President, Treasurer |
|                                                                                                                                                            |                        |                                                                                                                                                   |   | and Chief Financial Officer |
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name and Address) FOR COURT USE ONLY

ATTORNEY FOR 

TELEPHONE NUMBER

Ref. No. or File No.

SHORT TITLE OF CASE:

INVOICE NO. DATE: TIME: DEP./DIV. CASE NUMBER:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - NORTHERN DISTRICT, SAN FRANCISCO

One Embarcadero Center, 38th Floor

Outten & Golden LLP

San Francisco, CA 94111

(415) 638-8800

Plaintiff

450 Golden Gate Ave.

San Francisco, CA 94102

17-cv-454

140549-001

Perez, Mitzie v. Wells Fargo & Co.

1479201-02

 United States District Court

 Declaration of Service

I certify that I am authorized to serve the Summons and Complaint in the within action pursuant to F.R.Civ.P 4(c) and that I 

served the:

 

Complaint; Civil Cover Sheet; Summons-Federal; Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (ECF No. 

15); Clerk's Notice of Impending Re-Assignment to U.S. District Judge (ECF No. 16) ; Order Re-Assigning Case (ECF No. 

17) ; Standing Order for Civil Cases before District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.; Standing Order for All Judges of N.D. 

Cal.; N.D. Cal. (San Francisco) – Filing Procedures ; N.D. Cal. – ECF Registration Information; 

On: Wells Fargo & Co.

At: 2710 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150N

 Sacramento, CA 95833

In the above mentioned action by personally serving to and leaving with

Becky DeGeorge

Whose title is: Agent for CSC

On: 2/13/2017 At: 08:15 AM

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

Declaration of Service

Billing Code: 140549-001

Case 3:17-cv-00454-MMC Document 25 Filed 02/16/17 Page 1 of 2
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:

DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:

CASE NUMBER:

17-cv-454

Mitzie Perez

Wells Fargo & Co.

Person who served papers

 a. Name: Angelica Rodriguez Lezama

 b. Address: 15345 Fairfield Ranch Rd Suite 200, Chino Hills, CA 91709

 c. Telephone number: 909-664-9577

 d. The fee for this service was: 130.00

 e. I am:

 (3) [X] a registered CA process server:

 (i) [X] Independent Contractor

 (ii) Registration No.: 2013-30

 (iii) County: Sacramento

 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information contained 

in the return of service and statement of fees is true and correct.

>

2/14/2017

Angelica Rodriguez Lezama

Declaration of Service

Billing Code: 140549-001

Case 3:17-cv-00454-MMC Document 25 Filed 02/16/17 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Sathiyamurthy Chandramohan, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of American Reprographics Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2005 /s/  Sathiyamurthy ChandramohanChairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive Officer 26
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0696

__________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF D.A., L.A., and F.A.,

Youths in Need of Care .

_________________________________________________________________ **ORDER**

__________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s Mother’s motion for extension of time, without objection, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant Mother is granted an extension of time to and including April 1 4, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve h er opening brief on appeal. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 31 2023

03/31/2023
David ALLEN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1882

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FTC’S MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO PLAY VIDEO DEPO TESTIMONY 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION’S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO PLAY VIDEOTAPED 

DEPOSITION TESTIMONY FOR 

WITNESSES PREVIOUSLY 

IDENTIFIED AS LIVE 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1040 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 2
 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FTC’S MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO PLAY VIDEO DEPO TESTIMONY 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

On December 20, 2018, Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission filed an Administrative 

Motion for Leave to Play Videotaped Deposition Testimony for Witnesses Previously Identified 

as Live (the “Motion”). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is: 

 [ ] Granted. The FTC may play the videotaped deposition testimony of former 

Qualcomm employees Mr. Eric Reifschneider and Dr. Paul Jacobs, previously identified as 

witnesses the FTC intended to call live at trial, and may make corresponding substitutions to the 

FTC’s exhibit list consistent with the exhibits used during the designated testimony. The parties 

shall meet and confer to agree on a schedule for: (a) serving deposition designations and counterdesignations, and objections to same; and (b) the disclosure of any documents to be added to 

either party’s trial exhibit list, and the service of objections to any such documents. 

 [ ] Granted. Mr. Eric Reifschneider and Mr. Derek Aberle will be compelled to testify 

live on January 4, 2019. 

It is SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________, 2018 ___________________________________ 

 Honorable Lucy H. Koh 

 United States District Judge 

December 21

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1040 Filed 12/21/18 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41119 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS ISLAS-SAUCEDO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-240-1

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Islas-Saucedo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Islas-Saucedo complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. Heargues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. IslasSaucedo thus contends that his sentence should not exceed theNo. 02-41119 -2- maximum terms of imprisonment and supervised release prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Islas-Saucedo acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 124   Filed 10/09/19   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:16-cv-07222-SK   Document 124   Filed 10/09/19   Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LP**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor three months ended March 31, 2006 and filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy Moeder, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of Hiland Partners GP, LLC, the general partnerof Hiland Partners, LP (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 12, 2006 | /s/ Randy Moeder |
|--------------------|------------------|
|               |             | Randy Moeder |
|               |             | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Gordon Tattersall, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Blue Moose Media, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 10, 2011 /s/ Gordon Tattersall Gordon Tattersall President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Blue Moose Media, Inc. and will be retained by Blue Moose Media, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 XAVIER BECERRA 

Attorney General of California 

2 MICHAEL NEWMAN 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

3 SA TOSI-II YANAI 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

4 SARAH E. BELTON 

LEE I. SHERMAN (SBN 272271) 

5 Deputy Attorneys General 

300 S. Spring St., Suite 1702 

6 Los Angeles, CA 90013 

Telephone: (213) 269-6404 

7 Fax: (213) 897-7605 

E-mail: Lee.Sherman@doj.ca.gov 

8 Attorneys.for State ofCal/fornia 

9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

12 

13 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Case No. 3:17-cv-00485-WHO 

14 FRANCISCO, 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF LEE 

15 Plaintiff, SHERMAN FOR STATE OF 

16 

17 

v. 

DONALD J, TRUMP, President of the 

18 United States, UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA, ELAINE DUKE, Acting 

19 Secretary of United States Department of 

Homeland Security, JEFFERSON B. 

20 SESSIONS III, Attorney General of the 

United States, DOES 1-100, 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Defendants. 

CALIFORNIA 

Trial Date: Not Set 

A:ction Filed: August 29, 2018 

Notice of Appearance of Lee Sher11;an for State of California 

(Case No. I 7-cv-485) 

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 215 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 2
1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 

2 I, LEE SHERMAN, Deputy Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Office of the 

3 California Attorney General, hereby enter my appearance as counsel for STATE OF 

4 CALIFORNIA, in the above-referenced action. I am a member of the State Bar of California and 

5 am admitted to practice in the Northern District of California. My address and telephone number 

6 are as follows: 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

LEE I. SHERMAN 

Deputy Attorney General 

Department of Justice 

Office of the California Attorney General 

300 S. Spring St., Suite 1702 

Los Angeles, CA 90013 

Telephone: (213) 269-6404 

Fax: (213) 897-7605 

13 Please serve said counsel with all pleadings and notice in this action. 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: August 29, 2018 

2 

Respectfully Submitted, 

XAVIER BECERRA 

Attorney General of California 

MICHAEL NEWMAN 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

SA TOSH! Y ANAi 

Supervising Deputy Attorney General 

SARAI-IE. BELTON 

Isl Lee 1 Sherman 

LEE SHERMAN 

Deputy Attorneys General 

Attorneys.for State of California 

Notice of Appearance of Lee Sherman for State of California 

(Case No. I 7-cv-485) 

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 215 Filed 08/29/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of Solar EnerTech Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve Ye, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      August 16, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Steve YeSteve
      YeChief
      Financial Officer
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 486 

Recognizing Interscholastic Athletic Administrators’ Day on December 14, 

2021. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2022 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. RUBIO, and Mrs. 

CAPITO) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Interscholastic Athletic Administrators’ Day on 

December 14, 2021. 

Whereas, each December, the Senate recognizes the positive 

contributions of interscholastic athletic administrators; 

Whereas the position of school athletic administrator is recognized as a profession, which, like other academic professions, benefits greatly from continued education and certification; 

Whereas school athletic programs develop young people physically, mentally, socially, and emotionally by the life lessons learned through participation and competition; 

Whereas interscholastic athletic participation is an integral 

part of a student’s educational experience and enhances 

the learning and maturation process; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 486 ATS 

Whereas athletic administrators are committed to developing 

and maintaining comprehensive education-based athletic 

programs which seek the highest development of all student athletes; 

Whereas athletic administrators fulfill professional responsibilities with integrity, commitment to equality, industriousness to long hours, and fairness; 

Whereas athletic administrators preserve, enhance, and promote the educational values of athletics in our schools 

through professional growth in the areas of education, 

leadership, and service; 

Whereas athletic administrators embody high standards of 

ethics, sportsmanship, and personal conduct and encourage coaching staffs, student athletes, and community 

members to commit to these high standards as well; and 

Whereas the athletic programs run by these administrators 

have impacts that extend well beyond the playing field, 

athletic venues, and even the school: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the annual recognition of Inter3 scholastic Athletic Administrators’ Day on December 

4 14, 2021; 

5 (2) commends athletic administrators for their 

6 commitment and leadership provided to student ath7 letes at the secondary school level; and 

8 (3) commends the National Interscholastic Ath9 letic Administrators Association as the leading orga10 nization that prepares those who lead secondary 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 486 ATS 

1 school athletics throughout the country, providing 

2 continuous learning, compassion, and preparation 

3 within the profession. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Raymond M. LYNCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3377

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 223 

Congratulating the city of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, on its 100th 

anniversary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2021 

Ms. SMITH (for herself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the city of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, on 

its 100th anniversary. 

Whereas the city of Columbia Heights is a first-ring suburb 

of Minneapolis situated in the southern part of Anoka 

County; 

Whereas Columbia Heights was established as a village in 

1898 and incorporated as a city in 1921; 

Whereas Columbia Heights is now home to a diverse population, which brings together cultures from all across the 

world; 

Whereas Columbia Heights was designated in 2006 by community stakeholders and city officials as the ‘‘City of 

Peace’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 223 ATS 

Whereas Columbia Heights is a city that embraces ethnic and 

cultural differences so that all its citizens may live in 

peace; 

Whereas Columbia Heights was named an All-America City 

recipient in 2016; 

Whereas Columbia Heights prides itself in being a place 

where families can thrive; 

Whereas Columbia Heights has a small-town feel while still 

striving towards the goals of a big city; and 

Whereas, on July 21, 2021, the Columbia Heights will celebrate 100 years of incorporation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates Columbia 

2 Heights, Minnesota on its 100th anniversary. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS