alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6622

THOMAS EBRON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. KAREN D. BROWN, Chair, VA. Parole Board; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Members , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv
- 00720

- REP

- RCY )

Submitted : September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Thomas Ebron, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Thomas Ebron appeals the district court ’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) co mplaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012) . Ebron claims that the Virginia Parole Board violated his due process rights in denying him discretionary parole by not permitting him to review his file, failing to consider certain factors, and violating certain notice and review procedures . W e have
reviewed the recor d and find no reversible error. The parole board complied with the due process requirement of providing Ebron
with a statement of reasons for the parole denial, Burnette v. Fahey , 687 F.3d 171 , 181 (4 th Cir. 2012), and Ebron does not have a protected liberty interest in t he parole procedures themselves, Hill v. Jackson , 64 F.3d 163, 170 (4th Cir. 1995). While Ebron complains that the district court failed to give notice before dismissing his complaint, the
district court was not r equired to do so under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)( 2) , 1915A (a), (b) (2012). Accordingly, we a ffirm the district court’s
order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRM ED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 400 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 400

  Designating September 2021 as ``National Childhood Cancer Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2021

 Mr. Manchin (for himself, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Reed, Mrs. 
Capito, Mr. Casey, Mr. Graham, and Mr. Hawley) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating September 2021 as ``National Childhood Cancer Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas each year more than 15,500 children under the age of 19 in the United 
        States are diagnosed with cancer;
Whereas every year more than 1,700 children in the United States lose their 
        lives to cancer;
Whereas childhood cancer is the leading cause of death from disease and the 
        second overall leading cause of death for children in the United States;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for children with cancer has increased from 58 
        percent in the mid-1970s to 84 percent in 2020, representing significant 
        improvement from previous decades;
Whereas more than \2/3\ of children who survive cancer will develop at least 1 
        chronic health condition, and many survivors will face a late-effect 
        from treatment that could be considered severe or life-threatening;
Whereas cancer patients face a higher risk of contracting the Coronavirus 
        Disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to weakened immune systems; and
Whereas cancer occurs regularly and randomly and spares no racial or ethnic 
        group, socioeconomic class, or geographic region: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 2021 as ``National Childhood 
        Cancer Awareness Month'';
            (2) requests that the Federal Government, States, 
        localities, and nonprofit organizations observe the month with 
        appropriate programs and activities, with the goal of 
        increasing public knowledge of the risks of cancer;
            (3) encourages survivors of childhood cancer to continue to 
        receive ongoing monitoring and physical and psychosocial care 
        throughout their adult lives;
            (4) recognizes the human toll of cancer and pledges to make 
        the prevention and cure of cancer a public health priority; and
            (5) reminds the people of the United States that these 
        children are the definition of bravery, and commends and honors 
        their courage.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO.,LIMITED, Successor-in-interest to ST. PAULREINSURANCE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.,THE FORT MILLER CO. andBEECHE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

)))))))))))))))

No. C05-1912 BZ

ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT

Unionamerica’s unopposed motion to amend the judgment to

include pre-judgment interest is GRANTED.  The hearing set

for May 20, 2009 is VACATED.  The judgment is hereby amended

nunc pro tunc.  The parties shall stipulate to the amount of

prejudgment interest due on March 16, 2009, which amount

shall then be added to the judgment.

Dated: April 24, 2009

      Bernard Zimmerman                              United States Magistrate Judge

g:\bzall\-bzcases\unionamerica v. Fort Miller\Trial\Order on P’s Mot To AmendJudgment

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ   Document 386   Filed 04/27/09   Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.2**

** **

** **

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-203294) of Vornado Realty L.P. of our reportsdated March 24, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Toys “R” Us, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Toys “R” Us, Inc. and subsidiaries,included in it’s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 30, 2016.

 

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                                                                                                                

New York, New York

April 8, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT: 10.21

                                 FIFTH AMENDMENT
                             TO THE CHOICEPOINT INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


                  THIS AMENDMENT to the ChoicePoint Inc. Deferred Compensation
Plan (the "Plan") is made and entered into by ChoicePoint Inc. (the "Company")
as of the 2nd day of February, 2004;

                  WHEREAS, the Company has previously adopted the Plan, which
was originally effective July 30, 1997, and has amended the Plan on four prior
instances; and,

                  WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.5 of the Plan, the Management
Compensation & Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company did,
by resolution duly adopted, authorize the amendment of the Plan as reflected
herein, and the Company wishes to memorialize said amendment formally;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                                       1.

         Article III of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
Section 3.9 thereto:

                  "SECTION 3.9. Maximum Number of Shares Available for Certain
                  Benefits. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, in
                  no event shall the maximum number of shares of Company common
                  stock in the aggregate which may be granted subsequent to the
                  effective date of this provision, pursuant to Excess Profit
                  Sharing Contributions, Excess Transition Benefit Contributions
                  and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Contributions,
                  exceed three hundred and fifty-thousand (350,000). Said number
                  shall be adjusted, as appropriate, by the Plan Administrator,
                  consistent with the adjustment provisions contained in Section
                  2.5 above."

                                       2.

         Subparagraph (a) of Section 12.6 of the Plan is hereby amended by
adding the following sentence to the end of said subparagraph:

<PAGE>

                  "In the absence of a prior termination, this Plan shall
                  nonetheless be terminated, and no further benefits granted
                  hereunder, on April 28, 2014."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Fifth Amendment to be
executed as of the date and year first above written.

                                           CHOICEPOINT INC.



                                           By:   /s/ John H. Karr
                                              ---------------------------
                                           Title: VP, Compensation
                                                 ------------------------
Attest:

/s/ Mary M. Young
-------------------------------
Title: Assistant Secretary


                                       2
Benjamin MADDEROM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2566

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Samantha Ann Moya PIERRELOUIS, Appellant, v. Johnny Wagner PIERRELOUIS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4652

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed June 21, 2019.

Paula M. Johnson, North Port, for Appellant.

Allison M. Perry of Florida Appeals P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. *See**Grasso v. Grasso*, 113 So. 3d 855, 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ("To the extent that the order on appeal addresses the issue of subject matter jurisdiction, it is not an appealable, nonfinal order."); *Brulte v. Brulte*, 967 So. 2d 1087, 1088 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ("[c]oncluding that the order on appeal does not fall into any of the categories of appealable orders identified in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130" where the nonfinal order "dealt with subject matter jurisdiction" under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act).

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Richard D. KENNEDY v. STATE

CR-16-0849

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
James Derek COTTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3195

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRIC T 

## C OURT O F 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

__ ____ __ ______ ____ ___________ Case No

. 5D 23-6 9 LT Case No s . 45-2 018 -C F -0 00373 -A XXX

45 -2 018 -C F -0 00815 -A XXX

__ ____ __ ____________

_________ K IMBERLY K ESSLER A / K / A J ENNIFER M ARIE S YBER T , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________
O n appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. James H. Daniel , Judge

. Jes sica J. Yeary , Public Defender , and Kathleen Pafford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
A s hley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary F. Lawton, Assistant Attor n ey General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.
O ctober 31, 2023

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. L AMBERT , E ISNAUGLE , and P RATT , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of California

RIOT GAMES, INC.,

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-00331

Plaintiff(s)

v.

SHANGHAI MOBAI COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY 

CO., LTD., FAN QIANG, QIONGYU QU, CHAO LI, 

XIN ZHU, CHEN XU, XING WU, YIFEI JIANG, 

YINGFEI WU, and JIETING LI, and DOES 1-10, 

inclusive,

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

Fan Qiang

Baoshan District Shuichan West Road No. 67

Shanghai, China

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you 

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, 

whose name and address are:

Marc E. Mayer (SBN 190969)

Daniel A. Kohler (SBN 285501)

Matthew S. Beasley (SBN 288070)

Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP

11377 W. Olympic Boulevard

Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683

Telephone: 310-312-2000

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 5:17-cv-00331 Document 3 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 1
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

        Understanding Over-the-Counter Medicines

The Over-the-Counter Medicine Label Home
          Drugs
          Resources | Drugs
          Information for Consumers and Patients | Drugs
          Buying & Using Medicine Safely
          Understanding Over-the-Counter Medicines
          The Over-the-Counter Medicine LabelUnderstanding Over-the-Counter Medicines The Over-the-Counter Medicine Label
  	
        Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintThe New Over-the-Counter Medicine Label: Take a Look is a brochure that introduces you to the new and easier to understand ***Drug Facts*** label. It includes the importance of reading and using the label, and more. A detailed explanation of each section and a sample of the label is featured.Related InformationEducational Resources: Understanding Over-the-Counter Medicine

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      05/17/2018The Over-the-Counter Medicine Label
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
exv10wxfy



 




Exhibit 10(f)




AMENDMENT FOUR

TO

THE FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

RETIREMENT INCOME ASSURANCE PLAN

(1996 Restatement)



     1.     Section 7.1 of the Plan is amended effective January 1, 2003, to read
as follows:



     7.1 Assignment or Alienation.



          (a) Except as provided in Section 7.1(b) or as otherwise required
by law, the interest hereunder of any Participant or Beneficiary shall
not be alienable by the Participant or Beneficiary by assignment or any
other method and will not be subject to be taken by his creditors by any
process whatsoever, and any attempt to cause such interest to be so
subjected shall not be recognized.



          (b) All or a portion of a Participant’s benefit under the Plan may
be paid to another person as specified in a “Qualified Domestic
Relations Order.” For this purpose, a “Qualified Domestic Relations
Order” means a judgment, decree, or order (including the approval of a
settlement agreement) which is:




               (i) issued pursuant to a State’s domestic relations law;




               (ii) relates to the provision of child support, alimony payments or
marital property rights to a spouse, former spouse, child or other
dependent of the Participant;




               (iii) creates or recognizes the right of a spouse, former spouse,
child or other dependent of the Participant to receive all or a portion
of the Participant’s benefits under the Plan;




               (iv) provides for payment in an immediate lump sum as soon as
practicable after the Committee determines that a Qualified Domestic
Relations Order exists; and

 







 



               (v) meets such other requirements established by the Committee.



          (c) The Committee shall determine whether any document received by
it is a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. In making this
determination, the Committee may consider:




               (i) the rules applicable to “domestic relations orders” under
section 414(p) of the Code and section 206(d) of ERISA;




               (ii) the procedures used under the Basic Plan to determine the
qualified status of domestic relations orders; and




               (iii) such other rules and procedures as it deems relevant.



     2.     Appendix A is amended effective January 1, 2003, to add a new Section C
to the end of the Appendix to read as follows:



     C.     Progress Investment Management Company, Inc.



     Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, Marx Cazenave, a
former employee of Progress Investment Management Company, Inc., shall not be a
Participant in the Plan, and neither Mr. Cazenave nor any Beneficiary of his
shall be entitled to a benefit under the Plan.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment Four was adopted by the Human Resources
Committee at its June 17, 2003 meeting and is executed by a duly authorized
officer of FleetBoston Financial Corporation.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ M. ANNE SZOSTAK
	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	M. Anne Szostak
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Executive Vice
President and
Director
of Human Resources
Exhibit 10.6
 AMENDED AND RESTATED VNUS SEVERANCE PLAN  FOR MANAGEMENT AND KEY EMPLOYEES
  Definitions




---



##### 








---



##### 



Payments Upon Termination of Employment




---



##### 



A
    
    BQualifying Termination
    
    Qualifying TerminationWithin first year of
    
    Between 1 and 2 yearsChange of Control
    
    after Change of ControlCEO & vice presidents
    
    100% of Base Salary & Bonus
    
    67% of Base Salary &
Bonus12 months of benefits
    
    8 months of benefitsDirectors
    
    50% of Base Salary & Bonus
    
    33% of Base Salary &
Bonus6 months of benefits
    
    4 months of benefitsManagers
    
    33% of Base Salary & Bonus
    
    25% of Base Salary &
Bonus4 months of benefits
    
    3 months of benefits




---



##### 



Confidentiality
 Withholding Taxes




---



##### 



Reimbursement of Expenses and Settlement of Disputes
 Termination or Amendment of Plan
   Successors




---



##### 



No Mitigation, Offset
 Governing Law; Law Validity
 Administration
 Miscellaneous




---



##### 



By:Brian E. Farley, Chief Executive OfficerBy:Cindee Van Vleck, Interim Secretary &Senior Director of Human Resources
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY PRICE THOMAS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.17-cv-00245-LB

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on 6/12/2017, I SERVED a true and correct copies of the attached, by placing said 

copies in a postage paid envelope addressed to the persons hereinafter listed, by depositing said 

envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copies into an inter-office delivery receptacle located 

in the Clerk's office.

Gary Price Thomas & M. N. Thomas

2423 McBride Lane #6

Santa Rosa, CA 94503 

Dated: 6/12/2017

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

By:________________________

Liz Noteware, Deputy Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 20, 2015

p0317 

# Order

Clerk 

### March 20, 2015

151062

SC: 151062

In re BEELER/ HALL, Minors

. COA: 321648

Genesee CC Family Division:

12

- 128963

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

OCT 08 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

RACHEL CONDRY; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

TERESA HARRIS,

 Intervenor-Plaintiff -

Appellee,

 v.

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC.; et 

al.,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 20-16823

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00183-VC

U.S. District Court for Northern 

California, San Francisco

MANDATE

RACHEL CONDRY; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

TERESA HARRIS,

 Intervenor-Plaintiff -

Appellant,

 v.

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC.; et 

al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 20-16857

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00183-VC

U.S. District Court for Northern 

California, San Francisco

Case 3:17-cv-00183-VC Document 295 Filed 10/08/21 Page 1 of 2
The judgment of this Court, entered September 16, 2021, takes effect this 

date. 

This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 

41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Rhonda Roberts

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 3:17-cv-00183-VC Document 295 Filed 10/08/21 Page 2 of 2