alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.2
(logo) GMAC Mortgage


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

SEMT 07-03


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under
the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
17th day of March 2008.



By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name: Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Executive Vice President



GMAC Mortgage, LLC
1100 Virginia Drive
Ft. Washington, PA 19034
Ronald Pak ZERN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-806

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6372

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. STANLEY D. PARTMAN, a/k/a Goat , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 3:11

- cr - 02063

- JFA

- 10; 3:15

- cv - 04534

- JFA )

Submitted : September 13, 2018 Decided: September 18, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Stanley D. Partman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stanley D. Partman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 225 3(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standa rd by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Partman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO . A

- 3532

- 15T1 BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING,

Plaint iff

- Respondent,

v.
ROXANNE COLEMAN,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and JENNIFER HULVEY, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of ROBERT COLEMAN; CATHLEEN SCHLEPPY, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of ROBERT COLEMAN; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Successor Trustee to JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the Benefit of the Certificateholders of the CWHEQ INC., CWHEQ REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST SERIES 2005

- B; and ALERT AMBULANCE SERVICE,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________

Submitted September 6, 2017

– Decided
Before Judges Rothstadt and Vernoia.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court
. " A lthough it is posted on the internet , this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited
. R .1:36

- 3.

September 21, 20172 A

- 3532

- 15T1 On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Divisio n, Monmouth County, Docket No. F

- 0 34749

- 14.
Roxanne Coleman, appellant pro se.
Fein, Such, Kahn & Shepard, P C , attorneys for respondent (Douglas J. McDonough, on the brief).

PER CURIAM
In this foreclosure action, d efendant Roxanne Coleman appeals from orders entered by the Chancery Division on March 20, 2015 , awarding plaintiff Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC summary judgment,
striking defendant's answer, entering default and transferring the

matter to the Office of For eclosure, and denying defendant's
application to dismiss the complaint. She also appeal s from the

court's October 23, 2015 and April 1, 2016 orders denying
defendant's motions to vacate judgment and dismiss plaintiff's
complaint.
Judge Patricia Del Bueno Cleary denied each of defendant's
motions, setting forth her reasons on the record on March 19,

2015 , October 22, 2015, and March 31, 2016 . As stated in her
decisions, the judge found that defendant's challenge to
plaintiff's standing to pursue the forecl osure and her claims of
defects in required notices were without merit.
On appeal, defendant repeats the arguments she raised before
Judge Del Bueno Cleary and contends that the judge "abused [her]3 A

- 3532

- 15T1

discretion and erred [by] disregarding Defendant's evidenc e and not dismissing the Complaint." She again specifically argues that
plaintiff lacked standing and claims that the Notice of Intention

to Foreclose was defective
. We conclude from our review of the record and applicable
legal principles that defendant 's arguments are without sufficient
merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion, R . 2:11

- 3(e)(1)(E), and we affirm substantially for the reasons expressed
by Judge Del Bueno Cleary in her cogent decisions.

Affirmed.
Owen D. DENSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2339

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 20 (Friday, January 31, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8707-8708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02059]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

[[Page 8708]]

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP25-370-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2025 NAESB 4.0 to be effective 8/1/
2025.
    Filed Date: 1/27/25.
    Accession Number: 20250127-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/10/25.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].

    Dated: January 27, 2025.
Carlos D. Clay,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-02059 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
NO. 07-02-0356 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L C DECEM BER 10, 2002

______________________________ ESA U ROD RIGUE Z,

Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 222 ND DISTRICT COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNT Y; NO. CR99K-099; HON. DAVID W ESLEY GULLEY, PR ESIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. ON ABA TEMENT AND REMA ND Appellant Esau Rodrigue z appeals from a judgm ent convicting him of attem pted sexual assault. The clerk’s record is due in this cause, and an exten sion of the app licab le deadline wassought. To j ustify the extension, the district clerk represented that appellant has failed to 1) file a written designation for the clerk’s record, 2) file a written designation for therep ort er’ s re cor

d an d 3)pay

or m ake arr

ang em ents topay

for therec ord . Th is is the se co nd re qu es t f i l ed by th e d i st ri ct cl er k. Th e f i rs t r eq ue st was ba se d o n t he sa me2

reasons that are before us now . Nothing of record appears s howing the appel lant is indigent and entitled to a free record. Accordingl y, we now

abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 222nd Di strict Court of Deaf Sm ith Cou nty (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon rem and, the trial court shall imm ediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and , therea fter, conduct a hearing to determ ine the following: 1. w hether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. w hether appellant is indigent; and, 3. w hether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency. The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed
a supplem ental clerk ’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it ma y issue as a result of its hearing on this ma tter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transc ribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforem entioned hea ring . Addit iona lly, thedist ric t court shall then file the supplemental record with the clerk of this cou rton or before January 10, 2 003. Should further tim e be needed by the tr ial court to perf orm these tasks , then s am e m ust be request ed befor e January 10, 2003. It is so ordered. Per Cu ri am
Do not publish.3
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Financial Officer,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of VirtualScopics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly
      Henderson ,
      as
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
                November14, 2006/s/
                Molly HendersonMolly
                Henderson
              Chief
                Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance




This
      Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Nery Eder ZAMBRANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1650

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed July 12, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric H.
Brunngraber, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                           /s/ Eric H. Brunngraber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Eric H. Brunngraber
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           August 6, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass
Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60759 Conference Calendar

TATIANA KEREMIDTCHIEVA; ZVEZDOMIT P. KEREMIDTCHIEVA,, Petitioners,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA Nos. A 72 453 268/269

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tatiana and Zvezdomit Keremidtchieva petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s decision to deny Tatiana Keremidtchieva’s application for asylum and for a withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the Board’s decision is supported by substantialNo. -2- evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is DENIED.
**Exhibit
      13.1**




**Certification**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of China Digital TV Holding Co.,
      Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Company’s
      annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
      the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      June 18 ,
      2008




/s/
                Jianhua ZhuName:
                Jianhua ZhuTitle: 
                Director and Chief Executive
                Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.
Exhibit
      32.1











Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The
      undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of The Wilber Corporation (the
      "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date
      hereof:





(a)
            the
                Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended September
                30,
                2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
                (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(b)
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Douglas C. GulottyDouglas
                C. GulottyPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  November
                8, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to The Wilber Corporation and will be retained
      by The Wilber Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.






43
BOBBY SIMMONS
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS NO. § IN THE COURT OF § § CRIMINAL APPEALS § § OF TEXAS 

# t|«.|is

PRO SE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE AN ORIGINAL COPY ONLY OF THE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: COMES NOW the Appellant in the above-styled and numbered 

### cause and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to grant leave to file an original copy only of the Petition for Dis cretionary Review and in support therof would show to the Court the following: 

### 1. The style and appeal number in the Dallas Court of Appeals is: BOBBY SIMMONS V. THE STATE OF TEXAS; Appeal No.05-14-00241- CR, 05-14-00240-CR. 

### 2. The Appellant moves that/ pursuant to Rule 2, Texas 

### Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court suspend Rule 9.3(b)/ T.R.A.P., that requires the filing of eleven(ll) copies of the Petition for Discretionary Review with the Court. 

### 3. The facts relied upon to show good cause for this re quest are as follows: The Appellant is indigent and incarcerated 

### and does not have access to a photo copier. The Appellant is presently not represented by counsel and intends to file a 

### Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. 

## FILEDIN COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

### JAN222015 AbelAcosta,Clerk 

### RECEIVEDIN 

## COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JAN202015 

# AbelAcosta,Clerk

# I|l*|l5

WHEREFORE; PREMISES CONSIDERED/ the Appellant respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant leave to file an or 

### iginal copy only of the Petition for Discretionary Review with the Court. Respectfully submitted, Bobby SiJnmons#1941546 Telford Unit 3899 State Hwy 98 New Boston/ Texas 75570

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### The Appellant hereby certifies that acopyof the foregoing Motion has been mailed to the Office of the Criminal District 

### Attorney for Dallas County, Frank CrowleyCourts Building, 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-19, Dallas, Texas 75207-4399, on this



## j^ dayofJanuary, 2015. Bobby Salmons
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**  **AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S.B. Holding Co., Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Thomas E. Hales, as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas M. Buonaiuto, as Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on
      his knowledge that:


(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Thomas
                E. Hales
              Thomas
                E. Hales
              Chief
                Executive Officer
            
            Date:
              May 9, 2006/s/Thomas
                M. Buonaiuto
              Thomas
                M. Buonaituo
              Chief
                Financial Officer
            
            Date: May 9,
              2006




*This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*
----

|   | (a) | the      Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2008,      filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   /s/ Joseph E.      Sutaris                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph      E. Sutaris                                  |   |
|   | Executive      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |   |
|   | Treasurer,      and Secretary                           |   |
|   | Date:  May 7,      2008                       |   |

----