alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# m8551.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 2.8.2017 C(2017) 5568 final To the notifying part y : Subject : Case M. 8551 – ADVENT INTERNATIONAL / FAERCH PLAST GROUP Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 10 July 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Advent International (United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Færch Plast Group A/S (Denmark) by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for undertaking Advent International: private equity investment, - for undertaking Færch Plast Group A/S: manufacturing of plastic trays for food packaging. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
(S igned)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 233 , 19 . 7 . 2017 , p. 6 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 1 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 2 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 3 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 4 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 5 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 6 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 7 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 8 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 9 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 10 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 11 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 12 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 13 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 14 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 15 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 16 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 17 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 18 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 19 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 20 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 21 of 22
Case 3:17-cv-00187-CRB Document 1-1 Filed 12/22/16 Page 22 of 22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In Re QUALCOMM ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION, Case No. 17-md-02773 LHK (NC) 

Re: ECF 150

Case No. 17-cv-0220 LHK (NC)

Re: ECF 226, 231, 235

ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE

This order follows supplemental briefing by Qualcomm and Apple on two related 

discovery issues: (1) the interim deadlines for production of documents by Apple to 

Qualcomm; and (2) search term strings to be used by Apple in identifying responsive 

documents. Having reviewed the briefs, including a “corrected” brief filed out of time by 

Apple (ECF 231), the Court rules as follows.

1. Interim Production Deadlines.

The Court previously set December 15, 2017, as the deadline for Apple’s 

“substantial completion” of its document production to Qualcomm. The Court now sets 

additional deadlines. On November 3, November 17, and December 1, Apple must file 

and serve a status report specifically describing the document production status and 

identifying any disputes. By November 17, 2017, as suggested by Qualcomm, Apple must 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 239 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 2
 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

(a) complete its review of 50% of the total number of documents hit by the search terms; 

and (b) complete its production of all the responsive documents appearing in that 50%. 

The Court declines Qualcomm’s request that Apple prioritize specific custodians, given 

that Qualcomm has asked for documents from many custodians.

2. Apple’s Search Terms Objections.

The Court is not persuaded by Apple’s belated assertions of burden. Apple has had 

months to run its search metrics and to propose a workable solution. Apple is therefore 

ordered to use Qualcomm’s proposed search term strings (Ex. 1 to Oct. 10, 2017 joint 

discovery statement), as modified to include date ranges by an email from Qualcomm’s 

counsel to Apple’s counsel dated October 11. See FTC Dkt. 235-4 at 2.

No fees or costs are awarded in connection with this discovery dispute. The Court 

will address the corresponding motions to seal in separate orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 18, 2017 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 239 Filed 10/18/17 Page 2 of 2
r

3

O m

O s

£

O (0

"Z O

o

w I

O I

« i

Z

CO mJZ

•o r

O £

'E

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

^ILEd

05 2018

SOONG

northern oisTRicr of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

PIaintiff(s),

V.

BRANDON JONES,

Defendant.

/

NO.CRI7-0034-JSW-2

ORDER OF REMAND

The defendant having appeared before the undersigned Magistrate Judge, the Courtfinds by clear

and convincing evidence that the defendant violated the conditions of his pretrial release by failing to

report to the halfway house as ordered by the Court, by using a controlled substance without a legal

prescription, by harassing, threatening and intimidating his Pretrial Services officer and by having his

whereabouts unknown for six (6) hours on July 2, 2018, and from 2:30 p.m. on July 3, 2018, until he

appeared in Court on July 5, 2018. There are no conditions or combinations of conditions to mitigate

the risk offlight and danger to the community.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-named defendant, is hereby remanded to the custody

ofthe U.S. Marshal, immediately.

Dated: July 5, 2018

KANDI^ A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge
C HIEF J USTICE

C AROLYN W RIGHT

J USTICES

J IM M OSELEY

D AVID L. B RIDGES

M ICHAEL J. O’N EILL

K

ERRY P. F ITZ G ERALD

M OLLY F RANCIS

D OUGLAS S. L ANG

E LIZABETH L ANG

- M IERS

R OBERT M. F ILLMORE

L

ANA M YERS

D AVID E VANS

D AVID L EWIS

A DA B ROWN 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 C OMMERCE S TREET

, S UITE 200

D ALLAS

, T EXAS 75202

(214) 712

- 3400 L ISA M ATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712

- 3450

lisa.matz@ 5th.txcourts.gov

G AYLE H UMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRAT OR

(214) 712

- 3434

gayle.humpa@ 5th.txcourts.gov

F ACSIMILE

(214) 745

- 1083

I NTERNET

HTTP :// 5 TH

. TXCOURTS

. GOV



# May 1 9 , 2014

Bruce Cameron Kimberly Duncan

Attorney at Law Frank Crowley Courts

2309 Boll St. 133 N. Riverfront Blvd Ste

. 19

Dallas, Texas 75204 Dallas, Texas 75027

Re: James Riley V. The State of Texas: 05

- 13

- 00900

- CR, 05

- 13

- 0090 1

- CR F

- 1140796

- S and

F

- 1140798

- S

Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed is a corrected Memorandum Opinion issued May 8, 2014. Both trial court cause numbers

are now indicated on the Opinion.

P lease replace your previous copy with the enclosed.

Sincerely,

Lisa Matz

Clerk of the Court

cc: Andy Chatham

Gary Fitzsimmons
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Max Link, as Chief Executive Officer of Centerpulse Ltd. (the "Company") hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F report for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | By: | /s/MAX LINKName: Max Link
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 24, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Centerpulse Ltd and will be retained by Centerpulse Ltd and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 98-10595 Summary Calendar

_____________________ JOHN ERIC JACKSON, ET AL., Plaintiff, JOHN ERIC JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RODNEY COOPER, Senior Warden; B. FORSHEE; GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, TDCJ, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CV-277

_________________________________________________________________ November 27, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * John Eric Jackson, Texas prisoner #658692, appeals the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner civil rights case. Having reviewed the record and Jackson’s arguments on
appeal, we AFFIRM for essentially the same reasons cited by the

mag istrate judge. S ee Jackson v. Cooper , 1:97-CV-277 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 1998).2 A F F I R M E D.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of MediaBay,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth below, hereby
certifies that:

      3.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      4.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ John F. Levy
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer                                 Date: April 15, 2003
Lorenzo JACKSON v. Valerie JACKSON

2160889

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018 Reh. denied March 16, 2018

Affirmed.
# L_2017250EN.01005501.xml

| 28.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 250/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 250/55

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2017/1761

of 25 September 2017

appointing a member, proposed by the Italian Republic, of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Claudia BUSCHI, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Claudia BUSCHI,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Gerardo LARGHI, Professore — Dirigente della CISL Scuola dei Laghi di Como e Varese, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2017.

For the Council

The President

M. MAASIKAS

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

2

---
Robbie Glenn MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2738

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL THE JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No.17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL 

THE JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 1314

Before the Court is the joint administrative motion to seal portions of the Joint Pretrial 

Statement. ECF No. 1314. Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court orders as follows:

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

Exhibit A ¶¶ 100, 103, 105-109 DENIED.

Exhibit F Description of JX0109 DENIED.

The parties shall refile the exhibits consistent with this order by January 16, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 15, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1318 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT

OF THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 13350



Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and the Chief Financial Officer of Veri-Tek International, Corp. (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |        |  |                                                         
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ Todd Antenucci                                      
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Todd Antenucci                                          
|                      |  | Title: |  | President (Principal Executive Officer) of              
|                      |  |        |  | Veri-Tek International, Corp.                           
|                      |  |       
|Date: August 12, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David V. Harper                                     
|                      |  | Name:  |  | David V. Harper                                         
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of
|                      |  |        |  | Veri-Tek International, Corp.                           



20
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated 12/31/2001



 Exhibit 10.6A 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT to LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 
 DECEMBER 31, 2001 
  
 [Canopy Properties, Inc. / Altiris, Inc.] 
  
 This FIRST AMENDMENT is
entered into as of the twelfth (12th) day of September, 2002 (the “Effective Date”) between Canopy
Properties, Inc. (“Landlord”) and Altiris, Inc. (“Tenant”). 
  
 Whereas Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated December 31, 2001, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree to amend the Lease as follows: 
  
 1. Effective September 16, 2002, Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant hereby leases from Landlord approximately 429 rentable square feet of
additional space comprising the space identified as Property Management storage, situated on the second floor of the Canopy Building III, located at 588 West 400 South, Lindon, Utah, bringing the approximate total lease space to 47,824 rentable
square feet. 
  
 1.2 Upon the Effective Date, the total annual
rent for the Premises shall be increased by $7,953.72 to $886,656.96, for a net monthly increase of $662.81. 
  
 1.3 Commencing on the Effective Date, Tenant’s percentage share of operating cost is increased from 53.78% to 54.27%. 
  
 All other terms, conditions and provisions of said Lease shall remain in full force and
effect. 
  

	 LANDLORD:
 Canopy Properties, Inc.
	 	 	 	 TENANT:
 Altiris, Inc.

					
	By:	 	 /s/    BOYD
WORTHINGTON        

	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/    STEPHEN C.
ERICKSON        


	Its:	 	Managing Director	 	 	 	Its:	 	VP & CFO
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

314 

KA 14-01958 

PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANK VANALST, ALSO KNOWN AS SHAUN JOHNSON, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA, FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Frederick G.

Reed, A.J.), rendered July 30, 2014. The judgment revoked a

conditional discharge and imposed a term of imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously vacated on the law, and the matter is remitted to Ontario

County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment imposing a term of

imprisonment upon the determination of County Court that he violated

the terms and conditions of a conditional discharge that had been

imposed upon his purported conviction of criminal possession of a

controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [1]) upon

his plea of guilty. The People correctly concede that the parties and

the court mistakenly believed that defendant had entered a plea of

guilty at a prior appearance, when in fact, no plea proceeding had

taken place. Inasmuch as there is no conviction (see generally CPL

1.20 [13]), we conclude that the subsequent sentence imposing a

conditional discharge, the determination on the declaration of

delinquency, and the imposition of a term of imprisonment are void

(see generally CPL 1.20 [15]). We therefore vacate the judgment and

remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on the

indictment (see generally People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 366). 

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED 

TERMINAL, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-07014-VC 

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 204

In considering the parties' dispute about whether the City of Oakland may permissibly 

withhold documents on grounds of privilege or work-product protection, the Court will conduct a 

spot check by reviewing selected documents in camera. By Saturday, January 13, 2018, at 2:00 

pm, the City shall email to vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov, without CC'ing opposing counsel, the 

documents identified in Privilege Log Nos. 24, 25, 73, 76, 93, 101, 185, 190, 210, 215, 218, 610, 

and 611.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 12, 2018

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge