alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-4022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MITCHELL WAYNE SCHAEFER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-98-76-F) Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 30, 2003 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Edwin C. Walker, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mitchell Wayne Schaefer appeals from the judgment order of the district court revoking his term of supervised release and sentencing him to twenty-four months imprisonment. Schaefer claims that the district court’s order is plainly unreasonable because the sentencing range of the guidelines was eight to fourteen months. This court has previously held that the policy statements of Chapter Seven of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual are not binding on the courts. SeeUnited States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 1995). Schaefer’s five separate and unrelated violations of the terms of his supervised release provide ample support for the action of the district court, and Schaefer’s sentence is statutorily supported. See18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stream Global Services, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Dennis Lacey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 2, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    Dennis Lacey                                                                         
|                     |  |  |  | Dennis Lacey Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

FEB 26 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the 

United States; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 17-16886

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00485-WHO

U.S. District Court for Northern 

California, San Francisco

MANDATE

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the 

United States; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 17-16887

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00574-WHO

U.S. District Court for Northern 

California, San Francisco

The judgment of this Court, entered January 04, 2018, takes effect this date. 

This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 

41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 206 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 2 Case: 17-16886, 02/26/2018, ID: 10776379, DktEntry: 33, Page 1 of 2
FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Rebecca Lopez

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 206 Filed 02/28/18 Page 2 of 2 Case: 17-16886, 02/26/2018, ID: 10776379, DktEntry: 33, Page 2 of 2
# C_2018064EN.01000501.xml

| 20.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/5

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 15 February 2018

renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2018/C 64/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 14 July 2015 (2) and of 14 September 2015 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 14 July 2015 (2) and of 14 September 2015 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2018.

2

3

| (2) | A member’s seat is available for Italy on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Ms Marinella COLUCCI. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat is available for Italy on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Ms Marinella COLUCCI.

| (3) | The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2018, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2018,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following person is hereby appointed member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of its term of office, which runs until 17 September 2018:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES:

| ITALY | Mr Ugo MENZIANI |
| --- | --- |

ITALY

Mr Ugo MENZIANI

Article 2

This Decision shall be published, for information, in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 15 February 2018.

For the Council

The President

K. VALCHEV

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 232, 16.7.2015, p. 2.

2

(3)  OJ C 305, 16.9.2015, p. 2.

3

---
# L_2017319EN.01000101.xml

| 5.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 319/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 319/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/2227

of 30 November 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary's application to register the name ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary's application to register the name ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 252, 3.8.2017, p. 14.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Emmanuel J. ST. NATTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-557

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING ERICSSON’S MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING ERICSSON’S

MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 1411, 1419

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Ericsson’s motions to seal, 

ECF Nos. 1411 and 1419, as follows. 

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

JX0008 JX0008-005 GRANTED.

JX0008 JX0008-007 GRANTED. 

JX0008 JX0008-009 GRANTED.

QX9148 Portions of selected row on page 4 GRANTED. 

QX9180 Portions of selected row on page 2 GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1427 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 1
Case 4:17-cv-00486 Document 6 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR CITATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES ex rel. DONNA M.

McLEAN and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

ex rel DONNA M. McLEAN,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, THE

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND

FAMILY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA

COUNTY, KENNETH BORELLI,

LAWRENCE GALLEGOS, EPIFANIO (“J.R.”)

REYNA, TANYA BEYERS, DR. DEE

SCHAEFFER, DR. TOMMIJEAN THOMAS,

DR. RICHARD PERILLO and DOES 1-100,

Defendants. /

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

Counter-claimant,

 v.

DONNA M. McLEAN and DOES 1-100,

Counter-defendants. /

No. C05-01962 HRL

ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

A case management conference was held in this matter on August 1, 2006. Based upon

the discussion held at the conference, as well as the parties’ July 18, 2006 case management

statement, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

*E-FILED ON 8/1/06*

Case 5:05-cv-01962-HRL Document 47 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 If default is entered against these defendants, this court would be inclined to

sever those defendants and stay the instant action as to them so as not to delay the

proceedings as to those parties who have appeared.

2

1. In view of McLean’s statement that she will seek entry of default against

defendants Schaeffer and Thomas, she is directed to do so promptly.1

2. A further case management conference is set for October 31, 2006, 1:30 p.m. in

Courtroom 2. The parties shall file a joint case management statement no later than October

24, 2006.

Dated:

 

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

August 1, 2006

Case 5:05-cv-01962-HRL Document 47 Filed 08/01/06 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

5:05-cv-1962 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 

Melissa R. Kiniyalocts melissa.kiniyalocts@cco.co.scl.ca.us 

Douglas A Linde dal@lindelaw.net, ela@lindelaw.net 

Sara McLean sara.mclean@usdoj.gov 

Sara Winslow sara.winslow@usdoj.gov, kathy.terry@usdoj.gov; claire.muller@usdoj.gov 

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have

not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

Courtesy copy will be mailed to:

Julia Clayton

Deputy Attorney General

California Attorney General’s Office

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

Case 5:05-cv-01962-HRL Document 47 Filed 08/01/06 Page 3 of 3
Johnathan Michael HOANG v. STATE

CR-17-0177

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Jeffery Lee THOMAS

CR-17-0184

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Case 3:05-cv-02429-R Document 7 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 23
**EXHIBIT 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-38330,effective June 1, 2000, 333-42744, effective August 1, 2000, 333-51084, effective December 1, 2000and 333-116227, effective on June 23, 2004) on Form S-3 and on Form S-8 (No. 333-42145, effectiveDecember 12, 1997 as amended on June 24, 1998 and on March 28, 2006) and Form S-8 (No. 333-133183,effective April 10, 2006) of Helios & Matheson North America Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reportdated March 27, 2007 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements, and ScheduleII, which appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Helios & Matheson North America Inc. andSubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.Mercadien P.C., Certified Public Accountants
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DONALD RICHARD CHURCHILL, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1530-D

VS. §

 §

SHARON WHITAKER, et al., §

 §

Defendants. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the findings

and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge are

correct and they are hereby accepted as the findings of the court.

In his objection, plaintiff erroneously maintains that Judge Kaplan acted contrary to law in

recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted. Although plaintiff is correct that a

motion to dismiss is a dispositive motion that only a district judge can decide, Judge Kaplan has

merely recommended that the motion be granted; this court is deciding the motion after de novo

review of Judge Kaplan’s findings and recommendation.

Additionally, plaintiff appears to request that the court consider the present lawsuit to be a

habeas motion, see Obj. at 2, and he also asks the court to allow him to amend his complaint to

assert a claim for illegal search and seizure and conspiring to set him up, id. at 3. The court will not

convert his lawsuit to a habeas motion or grant him leave to amend.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01530-D Document 43 Filed 12/27/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 321
- - 2

The court will not grant plaintiff’s apparent request that the court convert this lawsuit to a

habeas motion because he already filed a habeas motion on January 18, 2005, which is currently

pending in Criminal No. 3:01-CR-373-G.

The court also denies plaintiff’s request for leave to amend. Although such leave is freely

to be given, one basis for denying such a request is futility of amendment. See, e.g., In re Southmark

Corp., 88 F.3d 311, 314-15 ( 5th Cir. 1996). An amendment would be futile when “the amended

complaint would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.” Stripling v. Jordan Prod.

Co., 234 F.3d 863, 873 (5th Cir. 2000). For the reasons already explained in Judge Kaplan’s

findings and recommendation, which the court adopts today following de novo review, the claims

plaintiff proposes to add would also be barred under Heck.

SO ORDERED.

December 27, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01530-D Document 43 Filed 12/27/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 322
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 25 (Friday, February 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02372]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than March 10, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
[email protected]:
    1. Heritage Bancshares, Inc., Topeka, Kansas; to acquire Fidelity 
State Bank and Trust Company, also of Topeka, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2025-02372 Filed 2-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN WHITSON,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00158-VC (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, a state inmate, has filed a pro se civil action under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 against John Whitson, Deputy Inspector for Alameda County District Attorney’s 

Office. Bonilla has been disqualified from proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g) unless he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time he filed 

his complaint. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); In re Steven Bonilla, No. C 11-3180 CW (PR); Bonilla v. 

Dawson, No. C 13-0951 CW (PR). 

The allegations in this complaint do not show that Bonilla was in imminent danger at the 

time of filing. Therefore, he may not proceed in forma pauperis. Moreover, even if the IFP 

application were granted, his lawsuit would be barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 

486-87 (1994). Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice.

The Clerk shall enter a separate judgment and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2017

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00158-VC Document 3 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 1