alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 24 (Thursday, February 6, 2025)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 9111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02405]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 24 / Thursday, February 6, 2025 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 9111]]

                Notice of February 4, 2025

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to the Situation in and in Relation to Burma

                On February 10, 2021, by Executive Order 14014, the 
                President declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security and foreign policy of 
                the United States constituted by the situation in and 
                in relation to Burma.

                The situation in and in relation to Burma, and in 
                particular the February 1, 2021, coup--in which the 
                military overthrew the democratically elected civilian 
                government of Burma and unjustly arrested and detained 
                government leaders, politicians, human rights 
                defenders, journalists, and religious leaders, thereby 
                rejecting the will of the people of Burma and 
                undermining the country's democratic transition and 
                rule of law--continues to pose an unusual and 
                extraordinary threat to the national security and 
                foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, 
                the national emergency declared on February 10, 2021, 
                must continue in effect beyond February 10, 2025. 
                Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
                National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared 
                in Executive Order 14014 with respect to the situation 
                in and in relation to Burma.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 4, 2025.

[FR Doc. 2025-02405
Filed 2-5-25; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3395-F4-P
```
EXHIBIT 35.1

 

Servicer Compliance Certificate

 

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2019-1

 

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Fifth Third Bank, National Association (“Fifth Third”), a national banking association, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2019 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Servicing Agreement”), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2019-1, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from May 8, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 

 

 

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 30th day of March, 2020.

Fifth Third Bank, National Association

 

 

By: _/s/ Nathan Steuber__________________ Name:  Nathan Steuber

Title:  Senior Vice President 

 

 

Servicer Compliance Certificate 

(FTAT 2019-1)
Ben E. SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1327

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Rehearing Denied February 18, 2019

Ben E. Smith, in proper person.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY and HENDON, JJ., and LUCK, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Connolly v. State*, 172 So.3d 893, 904 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (en banc) ("Use or possession of a firearm, however, is not an essential element of second degree murder, but rather, it may serve to allow for a reclassification of the second degree murder from a first degree felony to a life felony or as an enhancement of the sentence imposed." (footnote omitted) ).
SBN V FNBC LLC v. VISTA LOUISIANA, LLC

NO. 2019-C-651

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS**

Denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

CRICHTON, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Justice Genovese.

GENOVESE, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

GENOVESE, J., would grant and assigns the following reasons:

This case involves a summary judgment in connection with a suit on a $1,000,000.00 promissory note executed by defendant, Vista Louisiana, LLC ("Vista"), and sold by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to plaintiff, SBN V FNBC LLC, when First NBC Bank closed and was placed in receivership.

I found error by the lower courts in the granting of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment when the non-mover (defendant) has outstanding discovery requests and is precluded from adequate discovery. There were approximately four months from the date of filing suit to the date of the hearing on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 966(A)(3) calls for "an opportunity for adequate discovery" before granting a motion for summary judgment. Four months is hardly a sufficient amount of time to conduct adequate discovery. Additionally, the trial court ruled on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment while defendant's discovery requests (interrogatories, production of documents, and admissions of *1248fact) were still outstanding and subsequently denied defendant a continuance.

I find the trial court "jumped the gun" in granting a summary judgment without affording the non-mover an opportunity for adequate discovery and while there were outstanding discovery requests. Additionally, the trial court employed the wrong summary judgment standard when it clairvoyantly stated: "No amount of additional discovery on Vista's asserted defense would create a genuine issue as to which reasonable persons could disagree." Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 966(A)(3) sets forth the summary judgment standard and states that a motion for summary judgment shall be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, not when there is a genuine issue as to "which reasonable persons could disagree." Summary judgment has taken over the procedural spotlight and is a critical procedural tool in civil litigation. Therefore, it is imperative that the rules be strictly construed and closely followed.

For these reasons, I would grant this writ, reverse the lower courts, and deny plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
EXHIBIT
10.2


 


Amendment No. 1 to Employment,


Confidentiality and Noncompetition Agreement


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Employment,
Confidentiality and Noncompetition Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and
entered into as of December 23, 2008 between MediaDefender, Inc. a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Octavio Herrera (“Executive”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.            Pursuant to
that certain Employment, Confidentiality and Noncompetition Agreement dated as
of July 28, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”), Executive agreed to be
employed by the Company under the terms and conditions set forth therein.


 


B.            The
Parties wish to amend the term of the Employment Agreement to an at-will
arrangement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as
follows:


 


1.             Amendment
to Employment Agreement.


 


1.1           Paragraph
5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety by substituting
the following:


 


5.             Term.  Commencing January 1, 2009, either
Executive or the Company may terminate this Agreement upon five days written
notice.  Upon the effective date of
termination, with respect to the period commencing January 1, 2009 through
such effective date, Executive shall be entitled to receive only the
compensation set forth in Sections 2.1 (as to only the first sentence), 2.3,
2.4 and 2.5 of the Employment Agreement for such period.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
the Employment Agreement or in the Stock Option Agreement between Executive and
ARTISTdirect, Inc., Executive shall have a period of sixty days from the
effective date of termination to exercise all vested stock options issued to
Executive.


 


1.2           Paragraph
6 of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.


 


2.             Effect
of Amendment.


 


Except as expressly amended hereunder, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  “COMPANY 

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  MediaDefender, Inc. 

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ DIMITRI VILLARD

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  “EXECUTIVE” 

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ OCTAVIO HERRERA

  
	
   

  	
  Octavio Herrera

  



 


2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David F. Hackett, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |     |                                                                                            
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     |                                                                                            
|Date:  March 31, 2009 | By: | /s/ DAVID F. HACKETT                                                                       
|                      |     | David F. Hackett
Chief Executive Officer and President
Gulfstream International Group, Inc.
Case 4:05-cv-00024-A Document 15 Filed 09/12/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 140
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 186 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00081-B Document 26 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 434
TYRONE JULIUS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Civil Action No. 

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

NOV 2 7 2009 

NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON CLERK 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT' 

(j9 ~250 

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis 

and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint. 

Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short 

and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain 

statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment 

for the reliefthe pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of 

Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a 

responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res 

judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 

Plaintiffs complaint sets forth no facts at all, and utterly fails to comply with the minimal 

requirements of Rule 8(a). Neither the court nor the defendant can discern the nature or basis of 

plaintiffs claim, and the basis of the court's jurisdiction is unclear. As drafted, the complaint 

fails to comply with Rule 8(a) , and, accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed. An Order 

consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued on this same date. 

rk+~.~ Date: \ \ ItO Id\ United States District Judge
James MCCONICO, Jr. v. STATE

CR-17-0083

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 10.3


[letterhead of Navigation Technologies Corporation]


 


	
  To:

  	
  Koninklijke
  Philips Electronics N.V.

  
	
   

  	
  F.a.o.
  Corporate Treasury Department

  
	
   

  	
  Breitner
  Center, Building HBT 12

  
	
   

  	
  1070 MX
  Amsterdam

  
	
   

  	
  The
  Netherlands

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date: June
  27, 2003

  
	
   

  	
  Number:  9440...

  
			



 


Dear Sirs,


 


In consideration of you
granting a guarantee, dated June 27, 2003 with reference 9440 to ABN AMRO Bank
N.V. for our obligations under any loan
agreements entered into on the terms and conditions set out in the letter of
June 27, 2003  and the Promissory Note of June 27, 2003 as referred
to in the guarantee (which guarantee is attached to this letter in the form of
a final draft, conformed copy or copy of the executed version, initialed by us
for identification purposes, hereinafter the “Guarantee”).


 


We herewith irrevocably
guarantee payment to you of all sums paid by you in accordance with the
Guarantee which payment will be effected without undue delay upon receipt by us
of a written request for payment substantially in the form as attached to this
counter guarantee. Such payment shall be made to the account identified in the
request for payment.


 


Within five business days after
the signing hereof, we will pay you a fee equal to 12,5 basispoints over the
Amount as defined in the Guarantee, which fee will therefore amount to US$
3,125 (three thousand one hundred and twenty five US Dollars).


 


Any payments by us hereunder
shall be made free and clear of transfer taxes, withholding taxes or similar
charges.


 


The aforementioned obligations
cannot be cancelled or terminated by us. This letter shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of The Netherlands. Any dispute arising
hereunder or in connection herewith shall be submitted in first instance to the
District Court of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.


 


	
  Navigation
  Technologies Corporation

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Judson
  Green

  	
   

  
	
  Judson Green

  	
   

  
	
  President
  and CEO

  	
   

  



 


1
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 3 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 3, 2021 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That the daily meeting of the Senate be 12 

2 o’clock meridian unless otherwise ordered. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
James C. DAY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. NEWTON DEVELOPMENT, INC. and Rosedale Golf Holdings, Inc., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0486

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Discharged. Writ of certiorari is dismissed. Granted. Remanded.
Christopher Mack CHARLES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-1823

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 31, 2019

Christopher Mack Charles, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Makar, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Intelli-Check – Mobilisa, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.





Dated:
                          March
      30, 2009
                          /s/ Nelson LudlowName:
                          Nelson
      LudlowTitle:
                          Chief
      Executive OfficerDated:
                          March
      30, 2009
                          /s/ Peter J. MundyName:
                          Peter
      J. MundyTitle:
                          Chief
      Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K
or as a separate disclosure document.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHAUNCEY DEANDRE REED

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 283

- C R

Appeal from the

168 th District Cour t

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2015 0D0 0451 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Rachel Simons’ r equest for an extension of time within which to file

the Reporter ’ s Record until September 13 , 20 20

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Rachel Simons

, Official Court Reporter for the 168 th D istrict

Court for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record a nd forward the same to this

Court on or before September 13 , 2020

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 14 th day of August , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 97 (Friday, May 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Page 26891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-12327]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics: Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, the National Center for Health 
Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 
announces the following committee meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS).
    Times and Dates: 1 p.m.-5 p.m., June 14, 1995. 9 a.m.-5 p.m., 
June 15, 1995. 9 a.m.-3 p.m., June 16, 1995.
    Place: Room 703A, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence 
Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20201.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The purpose of this meeting is for the committee to 
consider reports from each NCVHS subcommittee; to receive reports 
from offices of the Department of Health and Human Services; to 
receive a report from the Center for Health Policy Studies on a 
working compendium of core health data sets currently in use or 
proposed for use for person level and event level in the United 
States; to discuss the Unified Medical Language System developed by 
the National Library of Medicine; and to address new business as 
appropriate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Substantive program 
information as well as summaries of the meeting an a roster of 
committee members may be obtained from Gail F. Fisher, Ph.D, 
Executive Secretary, NCVHS, NCHS, CDC, Room 1100, Presidential 
Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone 
301/436-7050.

    Dated: May 12, 1995.
Julia M. Fuller,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 94-12327 Filed 5-18-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1337

KENNETH SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEGAN J. BRENNAN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01097-CMH-MSN)

Submitted: August 31, 2018 Decided: September 6, 2018

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his amended complaint alleging employment discrimination, in violation of 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). The 

court dismissed Counts I and II for failure to allege facts establishing that Smith was the 

victim of intentional unlawful discrimination and Count II for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). 

Because the district court identified deficiencies that Smith may remedy by filing an 

amended complaint, we conclude that the order Smith seeks to appeal is neither a final 

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal 

Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar 

Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to 

the district court with instructions to allow Smith to file an amended complaint. See 

Goode, 807 F.3d at 630. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED