alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN RE: Daniel James STANFORD

NO. 2019-B-0626

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Respondent was convicted of conspiracy to introduce and cause to be introduced misbranded drugs into interstate commerce, money-laundering conspiracy, and money laundering. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that his conduct constitutes a violation of Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Daniel James Stanford, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22639, be and he hereby is disbarred, retroactive to September 17, 2014, the date of his interim suspension. His name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6194

JIMMY D. DUNIGAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK, Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:05-hc-00349-BO)

Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 26, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy D. Dunigan, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy D. Dunigan, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Dunigan has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 6

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-6 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
Order entered February 14, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 01308 - CV IN RE MICHAEL DEWAYN E RICKETT, Relator O rigi nal Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 2

D allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 17 - 00604 - 2



### O RDER Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle B y order issued December 5, 2019, t he c ou r t requested a response in this mandamus proceeding. On December 16, 2019, the respondent, the Honorable Ingrid M. Warren, filed a response, but inadvertently filed it under cause no. 05

- 19

- 00523

- CV instead of the current cause number. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer the Response to the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on December 16, 2019 by the Honorable Ingrid M. Warren from the case file in cause no. 05

- 19

- 00 523

- CV to the case file in cause no. 05

- 19

- 01308

- CV.
/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAND 435 

(CAND Rev. 0/2018)

TRANSCRIPT ORDER 

Please use one form per court reporter. 

CJA counsel please use Form CJA24 

Please read instructions on next page.

1a. CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS ORDER 2a. CONTACT PHONE NUMBER 3D. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRES1b. ATTORNEY NAME (if different) 2b. ATTORNEY PHONE NUMBER 3E. ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRE4. MAILING ADDRESS (INCLUDE LAW FIRM NAME, IF APPLICABLE) 5. CASE NAME 

8. THIS TRANSCRIPT ORDER IS FOR: 

7. COURT REPORTER NAME ( FOR FTR, LEAVE BLANK AND &+(&.%2;ȹޫ FTR ޫ APPEAL

ޫ NON-APPEAL

ޫ CRIMINALޫ CIVIL

ޫ In forma pauperis (NOTE: Court or

CJA: Do not use this form; use Form C

9. TRANSCRIPT(S) REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested), format(s) & quantity and delivery type: 

a. HEARING(S) (OR PORTIONS OF HEARINGS) b. SELECT FORMAT(S) (NOTE: ECF access is included with purchase of PDF, text, paper or condensed.) c . DELIVERY TYPE ( Choos

DATE JUDGE 

(initials)

TYPE 

(e.g. CMC) 

PORTION 

If requesting less than full hearing, 

specify portion (e.g. witness or time)

PDF 

(email) 

TEXT/ASCII 

(email) 

PAPER CONDENSED 

(email) 

ECF ACCESS 

(web) 

ORDINARY

(30-day) 

14-Day EXPEDITED

(7-day) 

{ { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { 

10. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, INSTRUCTIONS, QUESTIONS, ETC:ORDER & CERTIFICATION (11. & 12.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges (deposit plus additional). 12. DAT11. SIGNATURE

Jessica Campos (415) 434-9100 jcampos@sheppa

Leo D. Caseria (213) 620-1780 lcaseria@sheppa

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP333 South Hope Street, 43rd FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071-1422

FTC v. Qualcomm Incorporated 

✔

✔

04/18/2018 NMC Hearing ●

/s/ Leo D. Caseria 05/1

Clear Form 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 738 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF MID AMERICA BANK & TRUST COMPANY; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott J. Sagaria (SBN 217981)

Elliot W. Gale (SBN 263326)

Joe Angelo (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Pl., 5th Floor 

San Jose, CA 95110

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 297-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TARA AMADO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MID AMERICA BANK & TRUST 

COMPANY, et al,

Defendants.

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00300-NC

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

MID AMERICA BANK & TRUST 

COMPANY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO THE COURT, CLERK OF COURT, AND ALL PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Tara Amado and defendant

Mid America Bank & Trust Company that Mid America Bank & Trust Company be dismissed 

from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), 

and that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

//

//

//

//

//
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF MID AMERICA BANK & TRUST COMPANY; [PROPOSED] ORDER 

-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: April 17, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C.

By: /s/ Elliot Gale

Elliot Gale

Attorney for Plaintiff Tara Amado

DATED: April 17, 2017 Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edeman and 

Dicker, LLP

By: /s/ Gregory K. Lee

Gregory K. Lee

Attorney for Defendant Mid America Bank 

& Trust Company

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Gregory K. Lee has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Mid America Bank & Trust Company is 

dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
L.N. v. D.N.

2160612

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Affirmed.
1In his written objections, petitioner Cottone, acknowledging that he

cannot meet the “savings clause” test to proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, nor the

pre-conditions to filing of a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, argues

such limitations amount to an impermissible suspension of his right to file a

petition for writ of habeas corpus under Article I, Section 9 of the

Constitution. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has rejected this

argument. See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary Beaumont, TX, 305 F.3d 343, 346-47

(5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1241 (2003), citing Reyes-Requena, 243

F.3d at 893, 901 n. 19. Cottone’s objection on this ground is thus overruled.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

SALVATORE COTTONE, §

Petitioner, §

 § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:06-CV-044-Y

 §

COLE JETER, Warden, §

FCI-Fort Worth, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING 

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Salvatore Cottone under

28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Court has made an independent review of the

following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

June 8, 2006; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on June 16, 2006.

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Cottone’s

objections must be overruled, that the motion to dismiss should be

granted, and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, for the

reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.1

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00044-Y Document 13 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 55
2

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Respondent Jeter’s May 3, 2006, motion to dismiss [docket no.

10] is GRANTED.

Salvatore Cottone’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

SIGNED June 20, 2006.

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00044-Y Document 13 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 56
3

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00044-Y Document 13 Filed 06/20/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 57
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

MARCH 25, 2014

 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WD76117 Prentiss R. Fulton, Jr. vs. State of Missouri

WD76504 Charles Homan vs. State of Missouri

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WD75751 State of Missouri vs. Anthony C. Britton

WD76019 State of Missouri vs. Julie Laux
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

Vitria Technology, Inc.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

Cincinnati Insurance Company, et al.,

Defendant(s).

 /

NO. C 05-01951 JW 

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON CIC’S

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER

VENUE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO

CHANGE VENUE

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b), CIC Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue or, in

the alternative, to Change Venue is deemed submitted. Thus, the Court vacates the hearing on this

motion presently scheduled for July 11, 2005 at 9 a.m.

Dated: June 28, 2005 /s/ James Ware 

JAMES WARE

United States District Judge

Case 5:05-cv-01951-JW Document 23 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:

Christopher J. Sundermeier Sundermeierc@Cooley.com

Daniel Kaleba dkaleba@cooley.com

Jeffrey L. Fillerup jfillerup@luce.com

Dated: June 28, 2005 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: /s/ JW Chambers 

Ronald L. Davis

Courtroom Deputy

Case 5:05-cv-01951-JW Document 23 Filed 06/28/05 Page 2 of 2
Sean Thanh-Cong QUINN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3500

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                                   PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2005

I, Iurie Bordian, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Emerging Media Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the three months
ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company




                                           /s/ Iurie Bordian
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Iurie Bordian
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                           Financial Officer




                                           Dated: August 13, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.0

                      SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Federal Bancorp,
Inc. of Louisiana (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of Daniel R. Herndon,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Clyde D. Patterson,
Executive Vice President (principal financial officer), of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.


          Date: May 14, 2007       /s/ Daniel R. Herndon
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Daniel R. Herndon
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer



          Date: May 14, 2007       /s/ Clyde D. Patterson
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Clyde D. Patterson
                                   Executive Vice President
                                   (principal financial officer)

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana and will be retained by Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of
Louisiana and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

s0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

141403

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141403 COA: 291264 Oakland CC: 2006-209913-FH LESLIE JERMAINE MAYES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 18, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Randal Thomas ROSADO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Carmine MARCENO, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
STATE of Louisiana v. Tyran JONES

NO. 2019-KK-0836

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 22, 2019

Stay denied. Writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
# L_2017076EN.01000801.xml

| 22.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/8

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/490

of 21 March 2017

implementing Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt, (1) and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 270/2011. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.

| (2) | Two persons should no longer be kept on the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two persons should no longer be kept on the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2017.

For the Council

The President

E. SCICLUNA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

1

---

ANNEX

The entries concerning the following persons are deleted:

| 13. | Rachid Mohamed Rachid Hussein. |
| --- | --- |

13.

Rachid Mohamed Rachid Hussein.

| 14. | Hania Mahmoud Abdel Rahman Fahmy. |
| --- | --- |

14.

Hania Mahmoud Abdel Rahman Fahmy.

---
Stanley Bruce SESSIONS v. Lynn Duncan SESSIONS

2160380

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

Joint Stipulation for Dismissal Case: 3:16-CV-07023-JCS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS

Raymond G. Ballister, Jr. SBN 111282 

Russell Handy, Esq., SBN 195058 

Phyl Grace, Esq., SBN 171771 

Dennis Price, SBN 279082 

9845 Erma Road, Suite 300 

San Diego, CA 92131 

(858) 375-7385 

(888) 422-5191 fax 

mark@potterhandy.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 

KURT A. FRANKLIN, SBN 172715 

kfranklin@hansonbridgett.com 

JERRI KAY-PHILLIPS, SBN 314857 

jkay-phillips@hansonbridgett.com 

425 Market Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 777-3200 

Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 

Attorneys for NEXT GEN PROPERTIES 

LLC and THE FLOOR STORE, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SCOTT JOHNSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

NEXT GEN PROPERTIES LLC, a

California Limited Liability 

Company; 

THE FLOOR STORE, INC., a 

California Corporation;

and Does 1-10,

 Defendants, 

Case: 3:16-CV-07023-JCS 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO 

F.R.CIV.P. 41 (a) (1) (A) (ii)
2

Joint Stipulation for Dismissal Case: 3:16-CV-07023-JCS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION

 Pursuant to F.R.CIV.P.41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS STIPULATED by and 

between the parties hereto that this action may be dismissed with prejudice 

as to all parties; each party to bear his/her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

This stipulation is made as the matter has been resolved to the satisfaction of 

all parties. 

Dated: 10/2/17 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS 

By: /s/Phyl Grace 

 Phyl Grace 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: 10/2/17 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 

 By: /s/Jerri Kay-Phillips 

Jerri Kay-Phillips 

Kurt A. Franklin 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Next Gen Properties LLC, and The 

Floor Store, Inc. 

Dated: October 4, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero
3

Joint Stipulation for Dismissal Case: 3:16-CV-07023-JCS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that the content of this document is acceptable to Jerri KayPhillips, counsel for Next Gen Properties LLC, and The Floor Store, Inc., 

and that I have obtained Ms. Kay-Phillips’ authorization to affix her 

electronic signature to this document. 

Dated: 10/2/17 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS 

By: /s/Phyl Grace 

 Phyl Grace 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VIETNAM REFORM PARTY,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIET TAN - VIETNAM REFORM 

PARTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00291-HSG 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff filed this action on January 20, 2017. Dkt. No. 1. On August 26, 2019, the Court 

granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. Dkt. No. 90. In its 

order, the Court set a case management conference for September 3, 2019 “to discuss a plan for 

the prompt resolution of this matter in its entirety.” Id. at 21. Plaintiff failed to appear at the 

September 3, 2019 case management conference.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) provides that where a “plaintiff fails to prosecute or 

to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any 

claim against it.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Court may also sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of 

prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962). Accordingly, Plaintiff is 

ordered TO SHOW CAUSE why the remaining claims in this case should not be dismissed for 

failure to prosecute. Plaintiff must file a statement of no more than two pages by September 6, 

2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 9/4/2019

______________________________________

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

United States District Judge
David Lee ROBERTS v. STATE

CR-16-0708

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.