alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
William Henry BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1012

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2019

William Henry Brown, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Roberts and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
James Douglas WILLIE, Sr. v. STATE of Mississippi

2016-CT-01416-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: March 26, 2019 Closed: June 27, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Nicholas V. Chater, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-S Security Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 15, 2009



/s/ Nicolas V. ChaterNicolas V. ChaterChief Financial Officer
EX PARTE Ronald Eugene ROBERTSON

CR-17-0057

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. granted.
Alvin GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3295

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
A.K.M. v. STATE

CR-16-1070

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Trenton Lloyd JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2864

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

Lee Adam Cohen of Cohen Law, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Blain A. Goff, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Z.G. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160915

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Affirmed.
Victor RIVERA, Milagros Rosas, and Rosa Ramos, Appellants, v. SECURITY FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-27

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a

Delaware corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

MOTION OF NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY

FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMICUS CURIAE

BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S

OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Date: October 18, 2018

Time: 1:30 pm

Location: San Jose Courthouse, Courtroom 8

Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

For good cause shown, the motion of Nokia Technologies Oy for leave to file a brief as

amicus curiae is hereby GRANTED.

Dated: _______________, 2018

Hon. Lucy H. Koh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

October 4

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 890 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING

LITIGATION

 /

No. C 16-05674 WHA

No. C 16-05676 WHA

No. C 16-05679 WHA

No. C 16-05694 WHA

No. C 16-05701 WHA

No. C 16-05704 WHA

No. C 16-06315 WHA

No. C 16-06335 WHA

No. C 16-06363 WHA

No. C 16-06372 WHA

No. C 17-00343 WHA

No. C 17-00506 WHA

AMENDED CASE

MANAGEMENT ORDER

The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated request for an extension of time for

defendants to respond to the complaint (Dkt. No. 14). Defendants in this action, Grinder v.

Experian, No. 3:17-cv-00343-WHA, are not required to join in the combined motion to dismiss

due on February 9, and shall have until 30 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned

motion to respond to the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 8, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00343-WHA Document 15 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Eagle Resources Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ludvik
Rolin, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
March 14, 2009





Ludvik
Rolin





/s/ Ludvik
Rolin


(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and


Principal
Accounting Officer)
exv4w3






Exhibit 4.3




Consent of Dr. D.H.C. Wilton




     I, Dr. D.H.C. Wilton, hereby confirm that I have read the Offer and Circular of Fronteer
Development Group Inc. (the “Company”) furnished with the Company’s offer dated January 23, 2009 to
purchase all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Aurora Energy Resources Inc., which
Offer and Circular incorporates by reference the Company’s annual information form dated March 27,
2008 for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “AIF”).



     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with references to my preparation or
involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports in the AIF or other documents
incorporated by reference therein: (i) the technical report dated February 19, 2007 as amended
March 1, 2007 entitled “The Exploration Activities of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. on the CMB
Uranium Property, Labrador, Canada During the Period January 2006 to January 2007” prepared
together with Gary Giroux, and (ii) the amended technical report dated November 20, 2007 entitled
“The Exploration Activities of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. on the CMB Uranium Property, Labrador,
Canada, During the Period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007” prepared together with Gary Giroux,
Christopher Lee, Mark O’Dea, Jim Lincoln and Ian Cunningham-Dunlop (collectively, the “Technical
Reports”). I further consent to the inclusion in the Offer and Circular and the registration
statement on Form F-8 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Registration Statement”) of the Technical Reports (through the inclusion by way of incorporation
by reference of the AIF in the Offer and Circular) and of extracts from or a summary of the
Technical Reports in the Offer and Circular and the Registration Statement or any documents
incorporated by reference therein.



     I also hereby confirm that I have read the Technical Reports and extracts from or a summary of
the Technical Reports contained in the Offer and Circular and the Registration Statement by way of
incorporation by reference of the AIF and that I have no reason to believe there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived from the Technical Reports
or that is within my knowledge as a result of the services that I have performed in connection with
the Technical Reports.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	January 23, 2009 	  	(signed) Dr. D.H.C. Wilton
 	 
	 	 	Dr. D.H.C. Wilton, P.Geo.
EX PARTE Terry L. BRIGGS

1160791 (CR-15-1119)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Oral K. DRUMMOND, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1605

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the
“Amendment”) is made this 31st day of December 2008 between BIOMET, INC., an Indiana corporation (“Biomet”), and Glen A. Kashuba (“Executive”). All capitalized terms used herein shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement (defined below), unless otherwise defined herein. 
 WHEREAS, Biomet and Executive
entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of February 28, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, Biomet and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Biomet and Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Section 9(e): Termination by the Company Other Than For Cause, Death or Disability, or by the Executive for Good Reason, Following a
Change of Control. Section 9(e)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete the final sentence of Section 9(e)(i) in its entirety and replace it with the following: 
 “The total amount of the Change of Control Severance Benefit will be paid: (1) if the Change in Control constitutes a change in control event
within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5), in a lump sum as soon as administratively practicable (but in no event later than 30 days) following the Date of Termination or (2) if the Change of Control does not constitute a change
in control event within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5), in equal, ratable installments in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll policies over the course of the Non-Compete Period.” 
 2. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment
may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 *    *    *    *    * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement on the
date first set forth above. 
  

			
	BIOMET, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Bradley J. Tandy

	Name:	 	Bradley J. Tandy
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Glen A. Kashuba

	Name:	 	Glen A. Kashuba
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 16-1615

___________________________ Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr., lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant , v. Lancanster County; Lancaster County Jail Director, individually and in their

official capacity jointly and severally ; Lancaster County Medical Director, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Lancaster County

Correct Care Solutions Medical Department; Mary Howell, Lancaster County Correct Care Solutions Mental Health Prac titioner, individually and in their official capacity jointly, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant s, Christopher Eickholt, Lancaster County Public Defender/Court Official, individually and in their official capac ity jointly and severally; Lori Pasold, Lancaster County Attorney, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; Stephanie Stacy, Lancaster C ounty District Court Judge, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees , Patrick F. Condon, Lancaster County Ch ief Deputy County Attorney, individually and in their official capacity jointly and severally; State of Nebraska, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant s.

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________Submitted: July 22, 2016 Filed: August 3, 2016 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Robert Clayborne, Jr. appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal of his pro se complaint asserti ng a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, under 42 U.S.C . § 1983, and a claim of disability discrimination, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the dismissal was pr oper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID CHAD GLOW, No. C-05-1933 MMC (JCS)

Plaintiff(s),

v. NOTICE AND ORDERSETTING FURTHER

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD SETTLEMENT CONFERENCECOMPANY, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).___________________________________/

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

You are hereby notified that a Further Settlement Conference is scheduled for August 14,

2007, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,

California. 

Lead trial counsel shall appear at the Further Settlement Conference with the parties who

have full and unlimited authority to negotiate and settle the case.

Updated, confidential Settlement Conference Statements shall be LODGED with Chambers,

NOT electronically filed, no later than August 7, 2007.

Counsel shall notify the undersigned's Chambers immediately at (415) 522-3691 if this case

settles prior to the date set for the Further Settlement Conference.  All other provisions of this

Court's October 23, 2006 “Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order”

remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 31, 2007                                                    JOSEPH C. SPEROUnited States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01933-MMC   Document 90   Filed 07/31/07   Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING

LITIGATION

 /

No. C 16-05674 WHA

No. C 16-05676 WHA

No. C 16-05679 WHA

No. C 16-05694 WHA

No. C 16-05701 WHA

No. C 16-05704 WHA

No. C 16-06315 WHA

No. C 16-06335 WHA

No. C 16-06363 WHA

No. C 16-06372 WHA

No. C 17-00342 WHA

No. C 17-00343 WHA

No. C 17-00395 WHA

No. C 17-00397 WHA

No. C 17-00506 WHA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO

ANSWER OR OTHERWISE

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv-00395-WHA Document 11 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

In ten of the above-captioned cases, a combined motion to dismiss is scheduled for

hearing on March 23. This particular action, Keenan v. Equifax, 3:17-cv-00395-WHA, is not a

part of that combined motion. Defendants in this action, however, shall have until 28 DAYS

after the Court rules on the aforementioned combined motion to answer or otherwise respond to

the complaint. This order supersedes the prior stipulation to extend the time for defendant

Equifax, Inc., to respond to the complaint (Dkt. No. 10).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 20, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00395-WHA Document 11 Filed 03/20/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, S.P. Johnson IV, President and Chief Executive Officer of Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:




(1)
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:             August 17, 2009
/s/S.P. Johnson IV
Name:  S.P. Johnson IV
President and Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 319 

Expressing support for the designation of July 2021 as ‘‘National Sarcoma 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2021 

Mr. JOHNSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

AUGUST 9, 2021 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to with an amended preamble 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of July 2021 as 

‘‘National Sarcoma Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas sarcoma is a rare cancer of the bones or connective 

tissues, such as nerves, muscles, joints, fat, and blood 

vessels, that can arise nearly anywhere in the body; 

Whereas, in the United States— 

(1) about 16,000 individuals are diagnosed with sarcoma each year; 

(2) approximately 7,000 individuals die from sarcoma each year; and 

(3) about 50,000 individuals struggle with sarcoma 

at any 1 time; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 319 ATS 

Whereas, each year, about 1 percent of cancers diagnosed in 

adults and around 20 percent of cancers diagnosed in 

children are sarcoma; 

Whereas more than 70 subtypes of sarcoma have been identified; 

Whereas the potential causes of sarcoma are not well understood; 

Whereas treatment for sarcoma can include surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy; 

Whereas sarcoma is often misdiagnosed and underreported; 

and 

Whereas July 2021 would be an appropriate month to designate as National Sarcoma Awareness Month— 

(1) to raise awareness about sarcoma; and 

(2) to encourage more individuals in the United 

States to get properly diagnosed and treated: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate supports the designation 

2 of July 2021 as ‘‘National Sarcoma Awareness Month’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 512 

Supporting reopening the United States Capitol Building and Senate Office 

Buildings to the American people. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2022 

Mr. HAGERTY (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. THUNE, Mr. PAUL, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. MARSHALL, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. BARRASSO) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting reopening the United States Capitol Building 

and Senate Office Buildings to the American people. 

Whereas the United States Capitol and Senate Office Buildings closed to public visitation on March 12, 2020, at the 

very outset of the pandemic; 

Whereas, since March of 2020, the American people have 

learned how to safely gather and enter public places despite the existence of COVID–19 and, due to Operation 

Warp Speed, have had the opportunity to be vaccinated 

against COVID–19 for more than a year; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 512 IS 

Whereas, despite the existence of COVID–19, tens of thousands of people routinely gather across the country for 

sporting, entertainment, worship, and other events; 

Whereas, despite the existence of COVID–19, stores, restaurants, and other public places have been successfully 

welcoming the public since the pandemic began in 2020; 

Whereas, despite the existence of COVID–19, the American 

people, including Members of Congress, routinely use 

crowded public transportation vehicles, including airplanes and trains; 

Whereas, despite the existence of COVID–19, most Americans have long since resumed working around co-workers, 

customers, and others; 

Whereas it is illogical and unacceptable that, despite the rest 

of the United States being open, the United States Capitol Building and Senate Office Buildings, buildings that 

belong to the American people, remain largely closed to 

public visitation; and 

Whereas it is time to once again welcome the public participation in the legislative process and the public visitation 

of our historic buildings that have always been hallmarks 

of American democracy: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of reopening the 

3 United States Capitol Building and Senate Office 

4 Buildings to the American people to facilitate public 

5 participation in the legislative process and public vis6 itation of these historic buildings; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 512 IS 

1 (2) supports returning to the public visitation 

2 policies for Senate Office Buildings and the portions 

3 of the United States Capitol Building and Capitol 

4 complex within Senate jurisdiction that were in place 

5 before the COVID–19 pandemic. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 05-0423

IN RE  ECONOMY OIL COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s emergency motion for temporary relief, filed June 1, 2005, is granted.   All trial court proceedings in Cause No. 342-153149-94, styled *FFP Partners, L.P. v. Billy R. Delp, Jr., Et Al.,*in the 352nd Judicial District Court, Tarrant County, Texas and the court of appeal’s judgment and opinion, dated May 19, 2005, in No. 02-00065-05-CV, styled *In Re  Billy R. Delp, Jr. IRA,*in the Court of Appeals for the Second District, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The real party in interest is requested to respond to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., June 13, 2005.

Done at the City of Austin, this Friday, June 3, 2005.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Gena Pelham, Deputy Clerk