alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Brian W. Sturgell, Chief Executive Officer of Novelis Inc.(“Novelis”), certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Novelis;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;           b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and           c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and           b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2005     /s/ Brian W. Sturgell           Brian W. Sturgell     Chief Executive Officer
Edward Walter ZABOROWSKI, III, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1455

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Maxime CHERILUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# C_2018306EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/1

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1

(2018/C 306/01)

REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Budget 2018 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY |
| 1 1 | EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY | 50 348 623 | | 50 348 623 |
| | Title 1 — Total | 50 348 623 | | 50 348 623 |
| 2 | MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE |
| 2 3 | REIMBURSEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE | p.m. | | p.m. |
| | Title 2 — Total | p.m. | | p.m. |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 50 348 623 | | 50 348 623 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Budget 2018

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY

1 1

EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY

50 348 623

50 348 623

Title 1 — Total

50 348 623

50 348 623

2

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

2 3

REIMBURSEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE

p.m.

p.m.

Title 2 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

GRAND TOTAL

50 348 623

50 348 623

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2018 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | STAFF |
| 1 1 | REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES | 34 295 000 | –98 439 | 34 196 561 |
| 1 2 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE | 1 770 000 | 95 000 | 1 865 000 |
| | Title 1 — Total | 36 065 000 | –3 439 | 36 061 561 |
| 2 | INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE |
| 2 1 | BUILDING EXPENDITURE | 5 205 000 | | 5 205 000 |
| 2 2 | ICT EXPENDITURE | 3 010 000 | – 262 811 | 2 747 189 |
| 2 3 | MOVABLE PROPERTY AND CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURE | 424 000 | –3 750 | 420 250 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 8 639 000 | – 266 561 | 8 372 439 |
| 3 | PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE |
| 3 1 | PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE | 5 644 623 | 270 000 | 5 914 623 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 5 644 623 | 270 000 | 5 914 623 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 50 348 623 | | 50 348 623 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2018

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

STAFF

1 1

REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES

34 295 000

–98 439

34 196 561

1 2

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE

1 770 000

95 000

1 865 000

Title 1 — Total

36 065 000

–3 439

36 061 561

2

INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE

2 1

BUILDING EXPENDITURE

5 205 000

5 205 000

2 2

ICT EXPENDITURE

3 010 000

– 262 811

2 747 189

2 3

MOVABLE PROPERTY AND CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURE

424 000

–3 750

420 250

Title 2 — Total

8 639 000

– 266 561

8 372 439

3

PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE

3 1

PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE

5 644 623

270 000

5 914 623

Title 3 — Total

5 644 623

270 000

5 914 623

GRAND TOTAL

50 348 623

50 348 623

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND BULK & OVERSIZED 

TERMINAL, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-cv-07014-VC 

ORDER GRANTING OAKLAND'S 

MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1

Re: Dkt. No. 196

Oakland's motion in limine to exclude evidence and preclude argument at trial regarding 

the allegedly predetermined outcome of the vote on the proposed ordinance is granted. The fact 

that some city councilmembers apparently expressed advance support for the ordinance does not 

mean the City violated the contractual requirement for a "public hearing." Even if the outcome 

of the vote was "preordained" as OBOT alleges, legislatures commonly hold public hearings on 

votes despite the outcome being a foregone conclusion; this does not turn the hearing into

something other than a "public hearing." And there is no reason to ascribe some different, 

specialized meaning to the words "public hearing" as used in the Development Agreement. The 

City held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance, and (in this respect at least) complied with 

Section 3.4.2 of the Development Agreement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2018

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge
A-1 WHEELS & TIRE, LLC, d/b/a A-1 Wheel & Tire, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 40536

Appellee )

)

v. )

) ORDER

Brandon J. DURIVAGE )

Staff Sergeant (E-5) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 1

On 4 March 2024, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Appellant Review and Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach a DD Form 

2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special CourtsMartial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals, signed by Appellant 

and Appellant’s counsel on 4 March 2024. The Government did not submit any 

opposition.

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 7th day of March, 2024,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED. Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records 

Branch (JAJM) for further processing in accordance with Rules for CourtsMartial 1115(f)(3) and 1201, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024

ed.). 

FOR THE COURT

FLEMING E. KEEFE, Capt, USAF

Deputy Clerk of the Court
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT of CALIFORNIA

CRIMINAL HEARING MINUTES

Judge: Jon S. Tigar Time in Court: 26 minutes

Date: February 5, 2021

Case No. 4:17-cr-00028-JST-1

United States of America v. Jehoaddan Wilson

Defendant

 Present

 Not Present

 In Custody

Robert Rees Robert Waggener

U.S. Attorney Stand-by Counsel

Courtroom Deputy Clerk: Mauriona Lee Court Reporter: Diane Skillman

PROCEEDINGS

Pretrial Conference – held.

RESULT OF HEARING

1. Hearing held via Zoom videoconference. 

2. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the jury trial set for March 1, 2021 is VACATED.

3. Briefing schedule set on Motion to Dismiss, ECF. 258. Opposition due February 26, 

2021. Reply due March 19, 2021.

4. Status conference set for April 2, 2021 at 9:30 a.m.

5. Time is excluded through April 2, 2021 for reasons as stated on the record. The 

Government shall prepare a proposed order.

Case 4:17-cr-00028-JST Document 259 Filed 02/05/21 Page 1 of 1
Anthony P. JOHN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1095

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Vacated. Habeas corpus is denied. Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 12, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02508]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY

Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Office of Science and Technology Policy.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Science and Technology Policy publishes the 
names of the members selected to serve on its SES Performance Review 
Board (PRB).

DATES: Membership is effective on the date this notice is published in 
the Federal Register to January 2027.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Caitlin Pepicelli, Human Capital 
Specialist or Ms. Stacy Murphy, Deputy Chief Operations Officer/
Security Officer, Office of Science and Technology Policy, 1650 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20504, 202-456-4444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more PRBs. The purpose of 
this PRB is to review and make recommendations concerning proposed 
performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses, pay adjustments, and other 
appropriate personnel actions for incumbents of the SES positions. The 
Board shall consist of at least three members and more than half of the 
members shall consist of career appointees. The names and titles of the 
PRB members are as follows:
    Marie Scott, Associate General Counsel, Children, Families and 
Aging Division, Department of Health and Human Services;
    Scott Driggs, Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, Denver, 
Department of Health and Human Services;
    Rachel Park, Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, New York, 
Department of Health and Human Services;
    Constance Kossally, Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel, 
Atlanta, Department of Health and Human Services;
    Alphonso J. Hughes, Executive Assistant Director, Administration 
Group, Bureau of ATF, Department of Justice;
    Paula Lee, Chief Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, San 
Francisco, Department of Health and Human Services.

    Dated: February 7, 2025.
Stacy Murphy,
Deputy Chief Operations Officer/Security Officer.
[FR Doc. 2025-02508 Filed 2-11-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3270-F1-P
```
Exhibit 35.1

 

Servicer Compliance Certificate

 

FIFTH THIRD AUTO TRUST 2017-1

 

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Fifth Third Bank, National Association (“Fifth Third”), a national banking association, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) under the Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2017 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Servicing Agreement”), by and among Fifth Third Auto Trust 2017-1, the Servicer and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 

 

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 30th day of March, 2020.

Fifth Third Bank, National Association

 

 

By:     /s/ Nathan Steuber                           Name:  Nathan Steuber

Title:  Senior Vice President 

 

 

Servicer Compliance Certificate 

(FTAT 2017-1)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

egale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

jangelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 200

Roseville, California 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Betty Grinder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

BETTY GRINDER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 3:17-cv-00343-WHA

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Betty Grinder and defendant 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), through their designated counsel, that

Experian be dismissed with prejudice from the above-captioned action pursuant to Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(2), and that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and 

costs. 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:17-cv-00343-WHA Document 112 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

DATED: February 6, 2018 Sagaria Law, P.C. 

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Betty Grinder 

DATED: February 6, 2018 Jones Day

By: /s/Ben Lee

Ben Lee

Attorneys for Defendant

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

I, Elliot Gale, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this 

Stipulation. I hereby attest that Ben Lee has concurred in this filing.

/s/ Elliot Gale

 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Experian is dismissed with prejudice from the 

above-captioned action and that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 

 WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This dismissal is with prejudice as to plaintiff's claims only (i.e., without prejudice to any potential cross-claims that might possibly be asserted later by co-defendants against Experian). February 7, 2018.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:17-cv-00343-WHA Document 112 Filed 02/07/18 Page 2 of 2
21.1     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


         NAME                      STATE OF INCORPORATION           PARENT
         ----                      ----------------------           ------
Audio Book Club, Inc.                   Delaware                 MediaBay, Inc.
ABC-COA Acquisition Corp.               Delaware             MediaBay.com, Inc.
AudiobookClub.com, Inc.                 Delaware                 MediaBay, Inc.
ABC Investment Corp., Inc.              Delaware                 MediaBay, Inc.
MediaBay.com, Inc.                      Delaware                 MediaBay, Inc.
MediaBay Publishing, Inc.               Delaware                 MediaBay, Inc.
MediaBay Services, Inc.                 Delaware                 MediaBay, Inc.
RadioClassics, Inc.                     Delaware                 MediaBay, Inc.
Radio Spirits, Inc.                     Delaware                 MediaBay, Inc.
Video Yesteryear, Inc.                  Delaware            Radio Spirits, Inc.
# L_2017219EN.01000701.xml

| 25.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/7

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1390 of 26 July 2017 amending for the 272nd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda organisations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 195 of 27 July 2017
  )

On page 11, in the title of this Regulation:

for:

‘Al-Qaeda’,

read:

‘Al-Qaida’;

on page 11, in the second citation:

for:

‘entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda organisations’,

read:

‘entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations’.

---
Elisender Ugarte FROMETA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Maribel Reyes Montano, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0875

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
M. K. F., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4234

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Yulong Guo, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ Yulong GuoYulong GuoPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2008

---
Minnie BROWN v. Deborah TISDALE, M.D., et al.

1160126

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 13, 2017 Reh. denied December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41464 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN CARLOS ANDRADE-MESA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-389-ALL

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Carlos Andrade-Mesa (Andrade) appeals the 30-month sentence he received upon his guilty-plea conviction of attempted illegal reentry by an alien. Andrade contends that the district court erred by characterizing his state felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an “aggravated felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). Relief on this issue is unavailing in light of circuit precedent. See United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1997). Andrade argues that this circuit’s precedent is inconsistent with JeromeNo. 05-41464 -2- v. United States , 318 U.S. 101 (1943). Having preceded HinojosaLopez , Jerome is not “an intervening Supreme Court case explicitly or implicitly overruling that prior precedent.” See United States v. Short , 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir. 1999). Andrade also makes a constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), but it is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United
States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Andrade contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Andrade properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Andrea PRICE v. Michael PRICE

2170044

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 23, 2018

Dismissed.