alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Pixelworks, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-227352, 333‐219418, 333-212650, 333-205856, 333-197644, 333-190037, 333-182701, 333-168175, 333-161125, 333-152945, 333-136553, 333-126017, 333-125945, 333-121274, 333-89394, 333-62000, and 333-41722) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-221238, 333-221239, 333-198490, 333-170768, and 333-118100) on Form S-3 of Pixelworks, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2019, except for the restatement as to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the material weakness related to ineffective controls over the appropriateness of an accrual, as to which the date is August 9, 2019, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pixelworks, Inc. as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively, the “consolidated financial statements”), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, which reports appear in the December 31, 2018 Annual Report on Form 10‐K/A of Pixelworks, Inc.


Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to a change in the method of accounting for revenue in 2018 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers .


Our report dated March 13, 2019, except for the restatement as to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the material weakness related to ineffective controls over the appropriateness of an accrual, as to which the date is August 9, 2019, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, expresses our opinion that Pixelworks, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company does not have a control to review the appropriateness of an accrual based on applicable statutes of limitation due to ineffective risk assessment  of the continued existence of the liability.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Portland, Oregon


August 9, 2019
STATE of Louisiana v. Kendrick TAYLOR

No. 18-KP-2009

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WASHINGTON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in *889La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
AUDIO BOOK CLUB, INC.




February 25, 1999



Mr. Jesse Faber
1 Nutting Place
West Caldwell, New Jersey  07006

Re:  AUDIO BOOK CLUB, INC. (the "Company")


Dear Jesse:

This  letter  will cover the period of your  employment  with the  Company  from
November 1, 1998 until October 31, 1999 (the "Employment Term").

In this regard, the Company will pay you a base salary,  commencing  November 1,
1998 of $154,000 (One Hundred and Fifty Four  Thousand)  per annum.  Such salary
will be paid  monthly  in  arrears  on the last day of the  month at the rate of
$12,834 per month.

In addition to this base  salary,  you will  receive a bonus,  provided  you are
still  employed by the Company at the  conclusion  of the  Employment  Term,  of
$45,000 (Forty-Five Thousand Dollars) to be paid to you on October 31, 1999.

You will receive options to acquire 10,000 shares of common stock in the Company
pursuant to and in accordance with the Company's stock option plan. Such options
shall vest on October 31,  1999;  provided,  however,  that such  options  shall
terminate and be canceled if you are no longer  employed by the Company prior to
the date such options  vest.  Such options shall be  exercisable  at a price per
share  equal  to $8.00  and  will be  exercisable  for a  period  of five  years
commencing  immediately upon vesting,  provided,  however,  if you are no longer
employed by the  Company,  such  options  shall expire on the earlier of 30 days
following the date you are no longer  employed by the Company or five years from
the date such options initially became exercisable.

You acknowledge and agree that: all mailing lists, customer, member and prospect
names;  licensor  arrangements;  front end and back end  marketing  performance;
financial statements;  operating system;  proprietary technology;  web marketing
strategies  and  advertising  or other  contracts;  database and other  computer
software  specific to the Company;  and all information which is known by you to
be subject to a confidentiality agreement or obligation of confidentiality, even
without a confidentiality agreement between the Company and another


<PAGE>


person or party,  shall be  maintained by you in a  confidential  manner and you
agree that you will not use such  information to the detriment of the Company or
disclose such information to any third party,  except as may be necessary in the
course of  performing  your job  responsibilities.  You further  agree that your
obligations of  confidentiality  with respect to such information shall continue
for five years after you cease to be employed by the Company.

You acknowledge  that this letter and the May 1, 1997 employment  letter between
the Company and you and the  Employee  Handbook  embodies  and  constitutes  the
entire understanding between the Company and you with respect to your employment
by the Company and such  employment  arrangement may not be modified except by a
writing signed by the Company and you.


Very truly yours,

AUDIO BOOK CLUB, INC.



Michael Herrick, COO


AGREED AND ACCEPTED this 25th
day of February, 1999



_____________________________
Jesse Faber



cc:  Norton Herrick
Keith Allen SHEPHERD, DOC #T52004, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1321

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 1, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

d0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

147291

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147291

COA: 309303

Berrien CC: 2011

- 002807

- FH

MELODY TYNETTE JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of October 28, 2013, the application for leave to appeal the April 25,

2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

People v Earl (Docket No. 145677). On order of the Court, the case having been decided

on March 26, 2014, 495 Mich 33 (2014), the application is again considered and, it

appearing to this Court that the case of People v Cunningham (Docket No. 147437) is

pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an

issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application

be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 1 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 2 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 3 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 4 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 5 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 6 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 7 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 8 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 9 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 10 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 11 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 12 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 13 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 14 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 15 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 16 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 17 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 18 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 19 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 20 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 21 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 22 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 23 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 24 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 25 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 26 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 27 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 28 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 29 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 30 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 31 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 32 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 33 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 34 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 35 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 36 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 37 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 38 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 39 of 40
Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 225 Filed 05/28/21 Page 40 of 40
Exhibit 31.1 PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Lau Hing Bun, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elite Artz, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer=s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer=s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer=s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer=s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: November 6, 2007 /s/ Lau Hing Bun Lau Hing Bun Principal Executive Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Huey RANDOLPH

NO. 2018-KH-1180

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied. Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review and fails to show that any exception permits his successive filing. State ex rel. Randolph v. State, 16-2170 (La. 3/2/18), 237 So.3d 497.
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Roland
        O. Burns, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
              
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 /s/
        ROLAND O. BURNS
 Roland
        O.
        Burns
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 August
        8,
        2007
Retention Bonus Agreement



 Exhibit 10.12 
 Retention Bonus Arrangement 
 On July 31, 2008, Gateway Pacific Bancorp agreed to pay its Chief Financial
Officer, Kirk S. Colburn, a retention bonus equal to two months of Mr. Colburn’s salary (approximately $11,875/month or $23,750), to be paid in two installments. 
 The first payment ($11,875) was due upon the approval of a $1.0 million line of credit for Gateway Pacific Bancorp, which was approved in September 2008. The first retention bonus payment was paid by Gateway Pacific
Bancorp to Mr. Colburn on October 7, 2008. 
 The second payment ($11,875) will be due upon the commencement of banking operations by Gateway
Pacific Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gateway Pacific Bancorp. 
 Neither of these bonus payments have a contingent requirement that would require
Mr. Colburn to repay Gateway Pacific Bancorp under any circumstances.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 

CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-00381

ASCENSION LAW GROUP

PAMELA TSAO (SBN: 266734)

17802 Irvine Blvd Suite 117

Tustin, CA 92780

PH: 714.783.4220

FAX: 888.505.1033

Pamela.Tsao@ascensionlawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff NGOC LAM CHE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NGOC LAM CHE, an individual

Plaintiff,

vs.

SAN JOSE/EVERGREEN COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION, a 

California Corporation; IMWALLE 

PROPERTIES, INC, a California Corporation, 

Defendants.

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00381

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 

CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-00381

PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Pursuant to a settlement agreement reached by the parties, see ECF 56, Plaintiff Ngoc Lam 

Che (“Plaintiff”) is the prevailing party and is entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. On 

August 16, 2018, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees 

and Costs against Defendants San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Foundation, a 

California Corporation, and Imwalle Properties, Inc., a California Corporation (collectively 

“Defendants”), and awarded Plaintiff $32,237.50 in attorney’s fees. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:

1. Defendants are ordered to pay Plaintiff $32,237.50 in attorneys’ fees. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Court will retain 

jurisdiction to ensure compliance with this judgment. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the action be, and it hereby 

is, dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 27, 2018

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEHOADDAN WILSON,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cr-00028-JST-1 

SCHEDULING ORDER

The Court will conduct a hearing on the motion to withdraw filed by attorney Robert 

Waggener on April 1, 2022, at 9:30 a.m., the date and time previously set for sentencing. 

Defendant Jehoaddan Wilson is ordered to be personally present at that hearing. The Court notes 

that Ms. Wilson was already ordered to be present at that date and time. 

The sentencing hearing is continued to May 5, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. Sentencing memoranda 

are due by April 28, 2022. Ms. Wilson is ordered to be personally present at that hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 25, 2022

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 4:17-cr-00028-JST Document 340 Filed 03/25/22 Page 1 of 1
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending      September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and                                                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ended September 30, 2008, fairly represents in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Alliance Recovery Corporation. |

| Date:        November 19, 2008 |
|------------------------------------------|

| By:   | /s/      Peter Vaisler                                                                               |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            | Peter      Vaisler                                                                                   |
|            | Chief      Executive OfficerPrincipal      Financial Officer,Principal      Accounting Officer  |
Pete JIMENEZ v. STATE

CR-16-0637

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Autonomy: a view from the inside 

Dr. Ron Jarmin

Deputy Director, U.S. Census Bureau

October 25, 2022
It’s complicated

• Threats to the autonomy and scientific integrity of the 2020 Census 

are well documented.

• Citizenship Question, EO 13880, COVID schedule, role of imputation

• But administration officials were helpful as well.

• Increase in budget

• Assistance with Device as a Service and Print Contracts

• Assistance in keeping GSA “on schedule” for opening Area Census Offices

• At the end of the day, the Census Bureau was able to get the job 

done.

2
How can we do better?

• Several recent recommendations could help:

• Citro et. al. 2022

• FTAC report

• Maloney bill

• Unlikely that these will all come to fruition.

• Professionalism of Career Staff is Critical – Especially Senior 

Leadership

• Need to cultivate stakeholders in both parties.

3
Thank You

4
Exhibit 4.120




Exhibit 4.120




		
	

	TSX V: NGP


	OTCBB: NGLPF










November 13, 2008

Ms. Mel Meier

Bureau of Land Management 

1340 Financial Boulevard 

Reno,
Nevada 89510




Re:   Royalty Conversion 

Dear Ms. Meier.




In accordance with regulations contained in 43 CFR 3211 and 3212, regarding the Energy Policy Act Royalty Conversions, NGP Blue Mountain I LLC hereby requests that the leases listed below have their royalty converted to the royalty rate as described in 43 CFR 3211.17 (a)(1) since there has never been any production from the leases.

					
	 	•
	N-58196

	(01/04)

	 

	 	•
	N-77668

	(08/04)

	 

	 	•
	N-80086

	(08/06) Pending prior to EPA of

	2005


	 	•
	N-80159

	(08/06) Pending prior to EPA of

	2005




Should any additional information be needed or required. please contact Sharon DeSimoni at 775-786-3399 x 12 or by email at sdesimoni@nevadageothermal.com.




Sincerely.

Signed

Brian Fairbank, President




BF:SD

File: SD/Documents LetterFile/BLM RoyaltyConversionRequestLetters

			
	tel    604.688.1553

	Suite 900 – 409 Granville Street

	info@nevadageothermal.com


	fax  604.688.5926

	Vancouver, BC Canada V6C 1T2

	www.nevadageothermal.com
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**

**OFFICEROF GENERAL PARTNER OF HILAND PARTNERS, LP**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for three months endedMarch 31, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold Hamm, Interim Chief Executive Officer andPresident of Hiland Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of Hiland Partners,LP (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 10, 2007 |   | /s/ Harold Hamm                               |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|               |   | Harold Hamm                                   |
|               |   | Interim Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

1

----