alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 2 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 3 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 4 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 5 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 6 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 7 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 8 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 9 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 10 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 11 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 12 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 13 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 14 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 15 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 16 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 17 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 18 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 19 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 20 of 21
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 414-6 Filed 06/18/18 Page 21 of 21
Jimmie BARGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4550

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD DE'VONN WEBB,

Plaintiff,

v.

C.E. DUCART, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00330-HSG (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 8

Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for a 45-day extension of time to file an amended 

complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint no later than June 15, 2017.

This order terminates Docket No. 8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

5/4/2017
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-41014

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICKY LYNN GIBBS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(2:94-CR-7-2)

May 30, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ricky Lynn Gibbs appeals his conviction, after a bench trial, for

manufacturing phenylacetone, i n violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy

to manufacture amphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 846. He contends that the evidence was

insufficient to support conviction; he was denied a fair trial because the prosecutor

improperly commented on his postarrest silence during his cross examination; his1 United States v. Jennings , 726 F.2d 189 (5th Cir. 1984).

2 United States v. Calverley

, 37 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert

. denied

, 115

S.Ct. 1266 (1995).

3 United States v. Navejar , 963 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1992).

4 Arizona v. Youngblood , 488 U.S. 51 (1988).

2 counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor ’s improper

questioning; and the government failed to p reserve and test evidence before

destroying it.

Our review of the record persuades that the evidence is sufficient to support

the con victions. 1 We are likewise persuaded that although the prosecutor’s

question/comment on cross examination of Gibbs about his postarrest silence was

i mproper, and the prosecutor should take care not to repeat the impropriety in

future cases, this unobjected to failing, in the context of this bench trial, was not so

substantial and prejudicial as to taint Gibbs’ trial requiring a reversal. 2

Gibbs’ contention that his trial counsel was ineffective in not objecting to the

prosecutor’s cross examination is not cognizable at this time on the record before

us. 3 Finally, Gibbs has not demonstrated that the government acted in bad faith in

destroying the evidence identified by Gibbs. 4

Finding no reversible error, the convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Peter Allen ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-200

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 14, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 31, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 1, 2019

Peter Allen Anderson, Indiantown, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Due to Appellant's apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment(s) and sentence(s) in Seminole County Circuit Court Case Number 14-CF-0877-A, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. *See* *1195*State v. Spencer* , 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.

Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. *See* *Isley v. State* , 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough."). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. *See* § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018) ; *Simpkins v. State* , 909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.

COHEN, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Rafeh Hulays, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Netfone,
Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Netfone, Inc. for the period
          ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Netfone, Inc.

Date: August 14, 2008


/s/ Rafeh Hulays
--------------------------------------------
Rafeh Hulays
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 25 (Friday, February 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02391]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, February 18, 2025.

PLACE: via ZOOM.

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Regular Board of Directors meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in her 
opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the Government in 
the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) permit closure of the following 
portion(s) of this meeting:

 Executive (Closed) Session

Agenda

I. Call to Order
II. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive (Closed) Session
III. Executive Session: CEO Report
IV. Executive Session: CFO Report
V. Executive Session: General Counsel Report
VI. Executive Session: CIO Report
VII. Action Item: Approval of Meeting Minutes for December 19 Regular 
Board Meeting
VIII. Action Item: Resolution of Recognition of Service for Former FDIC 
Chairman Gruenberg
IX. Action Item: Resolution of Recognition of Service for Former Acting 
HUD Secretary Todman
X. Discussion Item: National NeighborWorks Association Presentation
XI. Discussion Item: Capital Corporations Presentation
XII. Discussion Item: Health Insurance Delegation of Authority
XIII. Discussion Item: Professional Learning and Event Planning 
Management System (PLEMS)
XIV. Discussion Item: Management Program Background and Updates
    a. 2025 Board Calendar
    b. 2025 Board Agenda Planner
    c. CFO Report
    i. Financials (through 11/30/24)
    ii. Single Invoice Approvals $100K and over
    iii. Vendor Payments $350K and over
    iv. Exceptions
    d. Housing Stability Counseling Program (HSCP)
    e. Strategic Plan Scorecard--FY24 Q4 (With Q4 Production)

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: Everything except the Executive (Closed) 
Session.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: Executive (Closed) Session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jenna Sylvester, Paralegal, (202) 
568-2560; [email protected].

Jenna Sylvester,
Paralegal.
[FR Doc. 2025-02391 Filed 2-5-25; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-P
```
Executive Order 14182

# Enforcing the Hyde Amendment

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

**Section 1**                    .                     *Purpose and Policy.*                     For nearly five decades, the Congress has annually enacted the Hyde Amendment and similar laws that prevent Federal funding of elective abortion, reflecting a longstanding consensus that American taxpayers should not be forced to pay for that practice. However, the previous administration disregarded this established, commonsense policy by embedding forced taxpayer funding of elective abortions in a wide variety of Federal programs.                

It is the policy of the United States, consistent with the Hyde Amendment, to end the forced use of Federal taxpayer dollars to fund or promote elective abortion.

**Sec. 2**                    .                     *Revocation of Orders and Actions.*                     The following Executive Orders are hereby revoked:                

(a) Executive Order 14076 of July 8, 2022; and

(b) Executive Order 14079 of August 3, 2022.

**Sec. 3**                    .                     *Implementation.*                     The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall promulgate guidance to the heads of executive departments and agencies related to implementation of sections 1 and 2 of this order.                

**Sec. 4**                    .                     *General Provisions.*                     (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2025-02175

Billing code 3395-F4-P
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of TheraBiogen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kelly T. Hickel, Chief Executive Officer and principal accounting officer,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





June 17, 2010





/s/ Kelly T. Hickel


________________________


Kelly T. Hickel


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S
Security Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 26, 2006



/s/ Ronald G. FarrellRonald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Novelis Inc. (the Company),hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.            /s/ Rick Dobson         Rick Dobson    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)  Date:October 19, 2006     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andis not being filed as part of this report.
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Du Song, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xinyinhai Technology, Ltd.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.  Date: November 17, 2006 /s/ Du Song Du Song, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$380,000                                                     Englewood, Colorado
                                                                October 27, 1999

For value received the undersigned, Chartwell International, Inc., hereby
promises to pay to Lincoln Trust Company Custodian F.B.O. John J. Grace's IRA
Rollover Account ("the Holder") at 6312 South Fiddlers Green Circle, Suite 400E,
Englewood, Colorado 80111 the sum of three hundred eighty thousand dollars
($380,000) with a simple interest rate of 10% per annum, in lawful money of the
United States. Interest will be compounded monthly and is payable quarterly, or
at the option of the Company no later than August 1, 2002.

This Note is due and payable in full on or before August 1, 2002 or at the
option of the Holder at the time financing is received.

This Note shall be considered in default if not paid off by August 1, 2002.
Should default occur, then at any time after August 1, 2002 the entire amount of
unpaid principal shall, at the option of the Holder, become immediately due and
payable.

The undersigned agrees, in the event of default, to pay reasonable costs of
collection, including attorney's fees incurred in connection with the collection
of this Note. The undersigned hereby waives presentment, demand, protest, notice
of protest, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, and notice of any kind
with respect to this Note or any guarantee of it.


                                       CHARTWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                       a Nevada Corporation

                                       /s/ Alice M. Gluckman
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Alice M. Gluckman, Corporate Secretary
EX PARTE Sherryl PALMORE

(In re Alabama State Personnel Board v. Sherryl Palmore)

1171069

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 14, 2018

**BOLIN**, *Justice*.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion. *Horsley v. Horsley*, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

Stuart, C.J., and Shaw, Wise, and Sellers, JJ., concur.
>352326('@ 25'(5 5(029,1* ,1&255(&7/< ),/(' '2&80(176

&$6(12 &9%/)69.

'8$1(0255,6//3

1LFROH(*ULJJ&$6%1

QHJULJJ#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

'6WXDUW%DUWRZ&$6%1

GVEDUWRZ#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

+DQRYHU6WUHHW

3DOR$OWR&$

7HOHSKRQH

)DFVLPLOH

'8$1(0255,6//3

-RVHSK$3RZHUV3$6%1

$GPLWWHGPro Hac Vice 

MDSRZHUV#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

-DUUDG0*XQWKHU3$6%1

$GPLWWHGPro Hac Vice 

MPJXQWKHU#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

6RXWKWK6WUHHW

3KLODGHOSKLD3$

7HOHSKRQH

)DFVLPLOH

$WWRUQH\VIRU'HIHQGDQW

&,6&26<67(06,1&

'8$1(0255,6 //3

/1RUZRRG-DPHVRQ*$6%1

$GPLWWHGPro Hac Vice

ZMDPHVRQ#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

0DWWKHZ&*DXGHW*$6%1

$GPLWWHGPro Hac Vice

PFJDXGHW#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

'DYLG&'RWVRQ*$6%1

$GPLWWHGPro Hac Vice 

GFGRWVRQ#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

-RKQ5*LEVRQ*$6%1

$GPLWWHGPro Hac Vice

MUJLEVRQ#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

-HQQLIHU+)RUWH*$6%1

$GPLWWHGPro Hac Vice

MKIRUWH#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

$OLFH(6QHGHNHU

$GPLWWHGPro Hac Vice

DHVQHGHNHU#GXDQHPRUULVFRP

3HDFKWUHH1(6XLWH

$WODQWD*$

7HOHSKRQH

)DFVLPLOH

81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

1257+(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

6$1-26(',9,6,21

),1-$1,1&D'HODZDUH&RUSRUDWLRQ

3ODLQWLII

Y

&,6&26<67(06,1&D&DOLIRUQLD

&RUSRUDWLRQ

'HIHQGDQW



&DVH1RFY%/)69.

352326('25'(55(029,1*

,1&255(&7/<),/(''2&80(176

(&)126





Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 610 Filed 05/04/20 Page 1 of 2


























































>352326('@ 25'(5 5(029,1* ,1&255(&7/< ),/(' '2&80(176

&$6(12 &9%/)69.

3XUVXDQWWR&LYLO/RFDO5XOHD'HIHQGDQW&LVFR6\VWHPV,QF3&LVFR ́ILOHGRQ0D\

LWV1RWLFHRI0RWLRQDQG$GPLQLVWUDWLYH0RWLRQWR5HPRYH,QFRUUHFWO\)LOHG'RFXPHQWV

GRFNHWHQWU\QXPEHUV 

DQGZKLFKVWDWHVWKDWWKHUHGDFWLRQVFRQWDLQHGLQWKHVHGRFXPHQWVZHUHLQFRUUHFWO\DSSOLHG

&LVFRUHTXHVWVWKDWGRFNHWV

  DQG   EH SHUPDQHQWO\ UHPRYHG IURPWKH &RXUW¶V (OHFWURQLF &RXUW )LOLQJ V\VWHP

&RXQVHO KDV QRWLILHGWKH(&)+HOS'HVNWR SXW DWHPSRUDU\ORFN RQWKH GRFXPHQW DQG QRWLILHG

FRXQVHOIRU3ODLQWLII)LQMDQ,QFRIWKHHUURU

*22' &$86( +$9,1* %((1 6+2:1 7+( &2857 +(5(%< 25'(56WKDWWKH

GRFXPHQWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKGRFNHWV

DQGEHSHUPDQHQWO\UHPRYHGIURPWKH&RXUW¶V(OHFWURQLF&DVH)LOLQJ6\VWHP

,7,66225'(5('

'DWH    

-8'*(%(7+/$%621)5((0$1

8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW-XGJH

May 4, 2020

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 610 Filed 05/04/20 Page 2 of 2