alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE A.-my GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

8 l #men mhool alsSrlot k 

.xocpi5ro6 to oontlnuo paylug 

BR B6 mllam tax to thmt 

Untrlot la sUUltlea ta rohool 

tuma for the 1ndepeAdoat 

8ahooldiUatrlot torbloh. 

tholr prBpErty WE rnmxod? 

rs* r~oriv*4 rour 1rtter of amaabur 7, 393 * la 

rhiah you r.qwJt our oplnloa ea th* rollorr14T qare P m: 

"lf the City d ~ernoo 8nnex.e the @rata 

~artlon of the Town a1 Nttt Yexnoa, will t-h@ 

'jtroperty owner8 zdtu8ted in the -%*a *m-dtory be rwufxe4 to eoatlnue to peg the ad +a& 

oxm tux @f &CO to the reauent of the am 

urhaaldlstriotlardaitiM tothe taxort 

will ba r49ulma to 

*y&m af tbo city of Y 

1nBuppartof the 3 001 

oxno&* 

%honetertho lledts of any ¶.Jworp6rekd 

l lty or town oonatltutlng •~ iabepsadsnt ~hwt 

di~tr loat r e uo l xtwh tb or enlewed l * to a - 

b aaa th wh o le or sa y p a r t o f a ny La Ua p ea b 

eat m maa uobaal didriot 8dJaoont to rruoh 

lneerporated olty or ,towa, that portlen of auoh 

ul)oo#at (LlStYkt Da Or!ihraMd WlthiA tha 6QpI 

gorate l&&t8 of'aueh inoorporrtod rit or kmi 

dal1thsnaft.r bowma a part of the z ndspoab 

ent asBoo dishriot Oan8tituted bf @u&a tAOOXpor a bl ltdl y o x ta me 
. I&& I. t. raaUl6, Pm@ 2 

$dy o? mnoh elty or tan end t&a authmltlu 09 

we& dlstr1ct. 

"t'hle eutiolr &all not l p ly whore lt ehrll 

k de~U%Aed et OR e&ettOA he P e rithbi0 euah 

oSty or tmvn b? ncjorllty 'rot8 of woe votiog 

thorron that tbm t.n1ters or wy portion thermof 

to be 60 es+xwesd abdl aot tt~uli; 8eaar.t a 

pm-t of th8 iA&?~AhAt Utl&O& aiStrfCt WAStlat.4 by mmh alty. QT. Sow, but ah011 b@ tahmn 

into the alty llsiltm tor muntolpal purpcsbs 

ealy ant &ml1 reeala far nrhool pprgoses a 

por tfoa n f the l djaqaxt f*:fe 

f 

a&ant or atbaa 

rekeol Ulstrlot 06 tbougb 6a E uity llettt had 

set k ea l xtwi(&d.* 

Wo l 8ane iron your qucmtlbn thot the texts to bo 

l&m4 for tha 8PppWt Of the iA6ependant schoc~ dlEtrlCt um 

k for MlntWnRoo an6 the paopwad aawrstlon d-ill be ior 

uo b Wl8tl wa ll l aramioipalparpo8ao. 

tax l 1) th4 NEt Of flL;u W. %&th*1118 ahpundeat S&o01 Dlstrtot, C. ?!. A. 239 2. k. 987. 

Xn 8ur onlnloa 

th8 nft6atlva.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                 |   |   |                         |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------|
| /s/              Thomas E.              Hales                        |   |   | Date: November 9, 2006  |
| Thomas                E. HalesChief                Executive Officer |   |   |                              |

|                                                                     |   |   |                   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------|
| /s/ Thomas M. Buonaiuto                                             |   |   | Date: November 9, 2006 |
| Thomas                M. BuonaiutoChief                Financial Officer |   |   |                        |
|                                                                          |   |   |                        |

*This      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Harlow HUTCHINSON

NO. 2019-KO-0108

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Eagle Resources Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ludvik Rolin, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 14, 2005

Ludvik Rolin

/s/ Ludvik Rolin(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Partners Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Donald J. York, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, to his knowledge on the date hereof, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Partners Financial Corporation and will be retained by Partners
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 13, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Donald J. York                                   
|                        |  |     |  | Donald J. York, President and Chief Executive Officer
Form of Waiver



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in the
United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the
regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I acknowledge that this regulation may
require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they
relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver
includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise
receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I,                         , intending to be legally bound
hereby, and for full consideration, have executed this Waiver this     th day of January, 2009.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Dated:   February 23, 2011 |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |                            |
|   | /s/   Lawrence D. Stern         |
|   | Lawrence   D. Stern             |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer       |

 

----
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Xiaoling Chen, Chief Accounting Officer Secretary of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Xiaoling ChenXiaoling Chen
Chief Accounting Officer and Secretary
July 2, 2008
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Wyatt Vogail SEXTON v. STATE

CR-16-0346

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ALD-059 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-4219

___________

IN RE: CLAUDIA WILTBANK-JOHNSON,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus 

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

December 15, 2011

Before: SLOVITER, FISHER AND NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed December 20, 2011)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Claudia Wiltbank-Johnson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a 

petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651, apparently requesting that 

this Court order the Delaware state courts to “dismiss all mock cases” against her.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy that is granted only in extraordinary cases. See In 

re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). Traditionally, it may 

be “used to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or 

to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so.” Id. (internal citation 

and quotation omitted). To demonstrate that mandamus is appropriate, a petitioner must 
2

establish that he or she has “no other adequate means” to obtain the relief requested, and 

that he or she has a “clear and indisputable” right to issuance of the writ. Madden v. 

Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996). 

Here, there is no basis for granting the petition for a writ of mandamus, as

Wiltbank-Johnson does not have a “clear and indisputable” to the relief requested. 

Wiltbank-Johnson has been involved in litigation in the Delaware state courts that 

apparently concerns her father’s estate. She has also filed a lawsuit in the United States 

District Court for the District of Delaware that references the state court proceedings.1 

(D. Del. Civ. No. 11-cv-617.) While Wiltbank-Johnson’s petition is not easily 

understood, she seems to want this Court to compel the Delaware state courts to dismiss 

cases filed against her and to enjoin certain attorneys from litigating against her. 

However, state courts are not “inferior courts,” over which we have mandamus power, 

and we cannot compel action by state courts or officials in connection with state court 

proceedings. See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 654 F.2d 268, 278 (3d Cir. 1981). 

Further, we lack authority to compel the attorneys referenced in the petition to act in 

accordance with Wiltbank-Johnson’s wishes. 

For the foregoing reasons, Wiltbank-Johnson’s petition for a writ of mandamus

will be denied.

 

1 Wiltbank-Johnson’s petition for a writ of mandamus does not appear to request that we 

compel the District Court to take any action. We note that the District Court has ruled on 

Wiltbank-Johnson’s cause of action, and that she has appealed to this Court from the 

District Court’s orders. (See C.A. No. 11-4042.)
Deante Trammell DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3157

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF**

**ASIAN TRENDS MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Asian Trends Media Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhi Jian Zeng, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that: 

 
|  

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

        /S/ *Zhi Jian Zeng, Jr.*        
**Zhi Jian Zeng, Jr.**

**Chief Executive Officer**

**May 24, 2010**

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EX PARTE Robert LITTLETON III

1161174 (2160403)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 26, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-00026-CV JESSICA MANFRE, Appellant V. JOSEPH PAUL MANFRE, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-19280 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, J ustice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By orders dated Apr il 4, 2018 and May 8, 2018, we granted appellant’s motions for extension of time to file he r brief. In our May 8, 2018 order, we extended the time to file appe llant’s brief until June 4, 20 18 and expressly cau tioned appellant that failure to file her brief by June 4, 2018 might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appella nt has not filed her brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

180026F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
JESSICA MANFRE, Appellant
No. 05-18-00026-CV V. JOSEPH PAUL MANFRE, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-19280. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appe al is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered September 26, 2018.
Barbara Ann KELLY, Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 9, 2019

Barbara Ann Kelly, pro se, Appellant.

Amelia Hallenberg Beard of McCalla, Raymer, Leibert, Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*473Barbara Kelly appeals an order denying her "emergency motion for injunction"-which sought a "moratorium" in her foreclosure case prohibiting the trial court from acting-even though final judgment had been granted in favor of SunTrust Bank over a year earlier. Because Kelly's "emergency motion for injunction" did not actually seek injunctive relief, the order denying it is not appealable. *See**Loidl v. I & E Group, Inc.* , 927 So. 2d 1016, 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("[I]t is not an order which directs or precludes the party from taking a certain action outside of the lawsuit. Therefore, it is not properly appealed under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B)."); *cf.**Stanfield v. Florida Dep't of Children & Families* , 698 So. 2d 321, 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) ("[T]his order is an Injunction entered by the trial court because the effect and purpose of the order is to enjoin [the opposing party] from doing those acts enumerated in the order."). We DISMISS Kelly's appeal.

Wolf, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
N.R., Mother of L.R. and I.G., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-0580

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 24, 2019

James R. Jupena, of the Law Office of James R. Jupena, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.

Kelly Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children & Families, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Joanna Summers Brunell, of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem Program.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the Department of Children and Families' Concession of Error, we reverse the trial court's February 1, 2019 final judgment for termination of parental rights and permanent commitment and disposition and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings. *See**E.A. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams.* , 894 So. 2d 1049, 1052 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, C.J., EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER October 2012

























































UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

 

Defendant(s). 





















&DVH1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 01/25/17

APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 



MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR LLC 3:16-cv-07213

SAPHENA MEDICAL, INC., et al.

Vanessa A. Arslanian

Vanessa A. Arslanian

Vanessa A. Arslanian

Supreme Judicial Court

Saphena Medical, Inc. and Albert Chin

Karen I. Boyd

Choate Hall & Stewart LLP, Two International 

Place, 34th Floor, Boston, MA 02110

Turner Boyd LLP, 702 Marshall Street, 

Suite 640, Redwood City, CA 94063

(617) 248-4073 (650) 521-5930

varslanian@choate.com boyd@turnerboyd.com

688099

January 27, 2017.

Case 3:16-cv-07213-WHA Document 42 Filed 01/27/17 Page 1 of 1