alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 223 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 223

 Congratulating the city of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, on its 100th 
                              anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2021

   Ms. Smith (for herself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the city of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, on its 100th 
                              anniversary.

Whereas the city of Columbia Heights is a first-ring suburb of Minneapolis 
        situated in the southern part of Anoka County;
Whereas Columbia Heights was established as a village in 1898 and incorporated 
        as a city in 1921;
Whereas Columbia Heights is now home to a diverse population, which brings 
        together cultures from all across the world;
Whereas Columbia Heights was designated in 2006 by community stakeholders and 
        city officials as the ``City of Peace'';
Whereas Columbia Heights is a city that embraces ethnic and cultural differences 
        so that all its citizens may live in peace;
Whereas Columbia Heights was named an All-America City recipient in 2016;
Whereas Columbia Heights prides itself in being a place where families can 
        thrive;
Whereas Columbia Heights has a small-town feel while still striving towards the 
        goals of a big city; and
Whereas, on July 21, 2021, the Columbia Heights will celebrate 100 years of 
        incorporation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates Columbia Heights, Minnesota 
on its 100th anniversary.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued March 7, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00569-CV

———————————

KINGWOOD DIAMOND, INC., OBAID UDDIN, AND

OHK GLOBAL, INC., Appellants

V.

LONESTAR PETROLEUM, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2019-27229

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Kingwood Diamond, Inc., Obain Uddin, and OHK Global, Inc. 

have neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of 

appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 

51.941(a), 101.041; Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts 
2

of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On August 29, 2023, appellants were notified 

that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid by 

September 28, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellants did not respond to 

the notice and the required fee has not been paid.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Hightower.
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT NOV 29, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 13188 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 0 0 1 7 5 - C R - T - 2 7 - MAP U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s C R U Z V A L D O V I N O S M A N C I L L A , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( N ove m b e r 29, 2007) B efo re T JO F L A T , B L A C K an dM A R C U S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: J o h n B a d a la m e n ti, ap p o in te dc o u n s e l f o rC ru z V a ld o v in o s M a n c illain th is2

di r e c tc r i m i na l appe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the ap p e lla n t a n df

ile dab r ie f

p u r s u a n t to A n d e r s v . C a lif o rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 , 8 7 S .C t. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L .E d .2 d4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 ) . O u rin d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls th atco u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd M a nc i l l a ’ s c onvi c t i ons a nd se nt ence s are A FFI R M ED .
#### George B. YODICE, Claimant-Cross Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

Nos. 04-7041, 04-7047.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: April 23, 2004.

Francis M. Jackson, Principal Attorney, Jackson & MacNichol, Portland, ME, for Claimant-Cross Appellant.

Mark R. Lippman, Principal Attorney, La Jolla, CA, for Amicus Curiae.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Principal Attorney, David M. Cohen, Of Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Martie S. Adelman, Richard J. Hipolit, Of Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellant.

Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves for an extension of time to file its brief. George B. Yodice opposes, moves to dismiss the Secretary’s appeal, and asks the court to establish a briefing schedule in his cross-appeal. The Secretary opposes. The court considers whether the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ decision in *715
      *Yodice v. Principi,*02-0215, 2003 WL 21756857 (July 24, 2003), should be vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this court’s decision in *Conway v. Principi,*353 F.3d 1369 (Fed.Cir.2004).

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary’s motion for an extension of time is moot.

(2) Yodice’s motions to dismiss and set a briefing schedule are denied.

(3) The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ decision is vacated and the case is remanded.
Richard CRAIG, DOC #059637, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-6 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: GMAC
    Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer and Paul
    Financial, LLC as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Wells Fargo Bank,
     N.A., in its capacity as Master Servicer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Middle Kingdom Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert J. Kinloch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 22nd day of February, 2006.



| | /s/ Robert Kinloch                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert J. Kinloch                                  
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer











---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

April 11, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132747 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132747 COA: 250006 Oakland CC: 2002-187306-FH ALVIN CHARLES WALKER, JR., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

p0404 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 11, 2007

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 3.01(a)

                       CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND MERGER

                                     MERGING

                            AVIS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.

                                      INTO

                              AVIS RENT A CAR, INC.


         The undersigned, Avis Rent A Car, Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware,


DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the name and state of incorporation of each of the
constituent corporations of the merger are as follows:

         Name                                        State of Incorporation
         ----                                        ----------------------

         Avis Rent A Car, Inc.                       Delaware
         ("Corporation")

         Avis Group Holdings, Inc.                   Delaware
         ("Avis")

         SECOND: That the Corporation is the holder of one hundred percent
(100%) of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Avis.

         THIRD: That the name of the surviving corporation is Avis Rent A Car,
Inc. (the "Surviving Corporation").

         FOURTH: That the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall
be the Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation, except that
the name of the Corporation shall be changed to Avis Group Holdings, Inc.

         FIFTH: That the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation by unanimous written consent dated March 27, 2000.

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the merger of Avis with and into
the Corporation (the "Merger") with the Corporation being the Surviving
Corporation, be and the same hereby is, approved; and be it further
<PAGE>

         RESOLVED, that the form of Certificate of Ownership and Merger whereby
Avis would merge into the Corporation with the Corporation being the Surviving
Corporation, be, and the same hereby is, approved; and be it further

         RESOLVED, that all shares of Avis common stock outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time of the Merger, shall, by virtue of the Merger, and
without any action on the part of the holders thereof, be extinguished; and be
it further

         RESOLVED, that the name of the Surviving Corporation shall be changed
to Avis Group Holdings, Inc.

         SIXTH: That this Certificate of Ownership and Merger shall be effective
on the date of filing with the Secretary of State of Delaware.


Dated: March 27, 2000


                                                   Avis Rent A Car, Inc.


                                                   By: \s\ KEVIN M. SHEEHAN
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Kevin M. Sheehan
                                                       President - Corporate and
                                                       Business Affairs and CFO


ATTEST:


\s\ KAREN C. SCLAFANI
-----------------------------
Karen C. Sclafani
Secretary
Case 3:05-cv-01929-MHP Document 4 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:05-cv-01929-MHP Document 4 Filed 05/16/05 Page 2 of 2
Kendrick M. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT J. SAGARIA (SBN 217981)

ELLIOT W. GALE (SBN 263326)

JOE ANGELO (SBN 268542)

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

2033 Gateway Pl., 5th Floor

San Jose, CA 95110

Telephone: 408-279-2288

Facsimile: 408-279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Victor Vazquez,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Sterling Jewelers, Inc.; et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00424-RS

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

THE COURT, THE PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a settlement has been reached between Plaintiff Victor 

Vazquez and Defendant Sterling Jewelers, Inc. in this matter. The parties anticipate finalizing 

the settlement and stipulating to a dismissal within the next 40 days. 

Date: May 26, 2017 SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

By: /s/Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 3:17-cv-00424-RS Document 30 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.                                                                     /s/ William J. Ryan   Name:  William J. Ryan   Title:  Chief Executive Officer   Date:November 16, 2005Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to TD Banknorth Inc. and will be retained by TD Banknorth Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Milton PLOTSKER, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 03-1644.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 14, 2004.

Martin G. Goldberg, Franklin Square, NY, for Appellant.

Mary M. Dickman, Assistant United States Attorney (Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Susan Corkery, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), Brooklyn, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: WALKER, Chief Judge, OAKES, and POOLER, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-appellant Milton Plotsker appeals from the August 29, 2003 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Leonard D. Wexler, *District Judge)*reinstating and modifying a prior restitution order imposed at the time of Plotsker’s sentencing in 2000 for a guilty plea entered in 1994. Plotsker’s appeal was filed on October 10, 2003.

As part of a criminal case, an appeal from a restitution order must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b); accordingly, a notice of appeal must be filed within ten days of the entry of judgment. *See*Fed. R.App. Pr. 4(b)(1)(A); 18 U.S.C. § 3664(o) (“A sentence that imposes an order of restitution is a final judgment.... ”). The timeliness of an appeal under Rule 4 is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *United States ex rel. McAllan v. City of New York,*248 F.3d 48, 51 (2d Cir.2001) (citations omitted); *accord*Fed. R.App. Pr. 26(b). Because Plotsker’s appeal, whether treated as an appeal from the August 29, 2003 restitution reinstatement order or from the underlying October 18, 2000 restitution order, was untimely filed, we must dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. *See United States v. Outen,*286 F.3d 622, 630 (2d Cir.2002).

We have carefully considered all of Plotsker’s arguments and find them to be without merit.

For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00310

- CR

MICHAEL DARREN BOYDS TON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F48751

ORDER

Michael Boydston’s motion for rehearing and en banc reconsideration is denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion Denied

Opinion delivered and filed August 2 7 , 2015
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 541 

Commemorating the life and legacy of Jean-Louis de Ke ́rouac on the 

centennial of his birth on March 12, 2022. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10 (legislative day, MARCH 7), 2022 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Ms. WARREN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the life and legacy of Jean-Louis de 

Ke ́rouac on the centennial of his birth on March 12, 2022. 

Whereas Jean-Louis de Ke ́rouac, better known as ‘‘Jack’’, 

was a giant of American literature and favorite son of 

Lowell, Massachusetts; 

Whereas, alongside Allen Ginsberg and William Burroughs, 

Jack Kerouac ignited the literary movement in the 1950s 

known as the ‘‘Beat Generation’’; 

Whereas the Beat Generation’s rebuke against traditional 

values and materialism created the foundation for subsequent counterculture movements in America and beyond; 

Whereas the beatnik stereotype dominated popular media and 

culture in the 1950s and 1960s, an amalgamation of 

Kerouac’s self-expressive, unconventional characters; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 541 IS 

Whereas the ‘‘Beatles’’ took their name after the movement, 

while artists such as Bob Dylan and Jim Morrison cite 

Kerouac’s work as major influences; and 

Whereas, more than half a century since his death, Kerouac’s 

novels still fire the imagination, particularly of young 

people, and serve as a tribute to their culture-changing 

origins: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes and commemo2 rates the enduring contribution of Jack Kerouac’s work 

3 to American literary culture and beyond on the centennial 

4 of his birth. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Case 4:17-mj-70058-MAG Document 51 Filed 02/15/18 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of DBT Online, Inc. and subsidiaries:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of DBT Online, Inc. and
subsidiaries ("DBT Online") as of December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1999 (not
presented separately herein). Our audits also included DBT Online's financial
statement schedule for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
1999 (not presented separately herein). These financial statements and the
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of DBT Online's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits. The consolidated financial
statements give retroactive effect to the merger of DBT Online and I.R.S.C.,
Inc. and subsidiaries ("IRSC"), which has been accounted for as a pooling of
interests as described in Note 3 to such consolidated financial statements. We
did not audit the statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and
cash flows of IRSC for the year ended December 31, 1998, which statements
reflect total revenues constituting 12% of consolidated total revenues for the
year then ended. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report
has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts
included for IRSC for 1998, is based solely on the report of such other
auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of
the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and for 1998 the report of the other
auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of DBT Online, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 6, 2000