U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
                    -----------------------------------------
                                   FORM 10-KSB

(Mark  one)
Annual report under section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

     For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003
                                       OR
Transition report under section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934

     For the transition Period from ____________ to ______________

                        Commission file number:  000-30096
                                               -------------

                            EAPI Entertainment, Inc.
                         ------------------------------
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

                            Duro Enzyme Products Inc.
                        -------------------------------
                    (Name filed on September 03, 2002 10-KSB)

                 NEVADA                               77-0454933
         -----------------------                  -------------------
    (State or other jurisdiction of                (I.R.S. Employer
     incorporation or organization)               Identification No.)

        201 - 20436 Fraser Highway
         Langley, British Columbia                       V3A 4G2
     -------------------------------                -----------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                (Zip Code)

                  Issuer's telephone number: (604) 514 - 3044

Securities registered under Section 12(b)
              of the Act:
           (Title  of  Class)               Name of exchange on which registered

                  None                                     None
 -------------------------------------      ------------------------------------

Securities registered under Section 12(g)
of the Act:                                  Common Stock, $0.001 par value
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                    (Title of class)

Check  whether  the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13  or  15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for
such  shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2)  has  been  subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES  X       No
    -----       -----

Check  if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation  S-B  is  not  contained  in  this  form,  and  no disclosure will be
contained,  to  the  best  of  registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or  any  amendment  to  this  Form  10-KSB.

The issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year were:  $NIL
                                                             ----

The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of
the registrant was $1,098,834, based on the average of the closing bid and asked
prices  as  of  March  4, 2004 as reported on the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin
Board National Quotation System. Shares of common stock held by each officer and
director  and  by  each  person who owns five percent or more of the outstanding
common  stock  have  been  excluded from this calculation as such persons may be
considered  to  be  affiliated  with  the  issuer.

On  March 4,  2004, the registrant had 13,155,560 shares of Common Stock, $0.001
par  value  per  share,  issued  and  outstanding.

Transitional  Small  Business  Disclosure  Format:  Yes    No X


<PAGE>
                            EAPI ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                     (FORMERLY - DURO ENZYME PRODUCTS INC.)

                                    INDEX TO
                          ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

PART  I                                                                     PAGE

Item  1     Description  of  Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
Item  2     Description  of  Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Item  3     Legal  Proceedings  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Item  4     Submission  of  Matters  to  a  Vote  of  Security  Holders . . . 11

PART  II

Item  5     Market  for  Common  Equity  and  Related Stockholder Matters . . 12
Item  6     Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan
            of  Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Item  7     Financial  Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Item  8     Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
            Financial  Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Item  8A    Controls  and  Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21


PART  III

Item  9     Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
            Compliance  With Section  16(a)  of  the  Exchange  Act . . . . . 23
Item  10    Executive  Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Item  11    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
            and  Related  Stockholder  Matters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Item  12    Certain  Relationships  and  Related  Transactions. . . . . . . . 28
Item  13    Exhibits  and  Reports  on  Form  8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Item  14    Principal  Accountant  Fees  and  Services. . . . . . . . . . . . 31


SIGNATURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32


<PAGE>
                                     PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS

Except  for  the  historical information presented in this document, the matters
discussed  in  this  Form  10-KSB,  and  specifically  in the sections entitled,
"Description of Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition  or  Plan  of  Operation," or otherwise incorporated by reference into
this  document  contain "forward-looking statements" (as such term is defined in
the  Private  Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements can be
identified  by  the  use  of  forward-looking  terminology  such  as "believes",
"expects",  "may", "will", "intends", "should", or "anticipates" or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions
of  strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. The safe harbor provisions of
Section  21B  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,(the "Exchange
Act")and  Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,(the "Securities
Act")apply  to  forward-looking statements made by EAPI Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company").  You  should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking  statements  involve  risks  and  uncertainties, including those
identified  within  the  section  entitled  "Risk  Factors" and elsewhere in, or
incorporated  by  reference  into, this Form 10-KSB. The actual results that the
Company  achieves  may differ materially from any forward-looking statements due
to  such  risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on
current  expectations,  and  the  Company  assumes  no obligation to update this
information.  Readers  are  urged  to  carefully review and consider the various
disclosures  made by the Company in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and in the
Company's  other  reports  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the
"SEC")that  attempt  to  advise interested parties of the risks and factors that
may  affect  the  Company's  business.

All  dollar  amounts  in this annual report are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise
stated.

ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION  OF  BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

EAPI  Entertainment,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  is  currently  undertaking  the
reorganization  of its corporate affairs in connection with the determination of
the  board  of  directors  to  pursue  business  opportunities  in  the areas of
electronic  entertainment and education.  The steps undertaken by the Company to
complete this reorganization are outlined below under "Recent Corporate Events".
The  Company plans to develop video game products for the entertainment industry
and on-line education software programs for the education industry.  The Company
also  plans  on  identifying  and  pursuing  other business opportunities in the
electronic  entertainment  industry.  To date, the Company has not completed the
development  of  any  video game products or on-line education software programs
and  has  not  generated  any  revenues.  The Company remains in the development
stage.  The  ability  of  the  Company  to pursue its business plan and generate
revenues  is  subject  to  the  ability  of  the  Company  to achieve additional
financing,  of  which  there  is  no  assurance.

CORPORATE  BACKGROUND

The  Company  is  a  Nevada  corporation  incorporated on September 15, 1995. In
January 2001, the Company changed its name from "Home Web, Inc." to "Duro Enzyme
Products".  In May 2003, the Company changed its name from "Duro Enzyme Products
Inc."  to  "EAPI  Entertainment,  Inc."  and  the Company's accounting year  was
changed  from  a  December  31  year-end  to  a  September  30  year-end.

In this document, unless the context otherwise requires, the "Company" refers to
EAPI  Entertainment,  Inc.  and  its  subsidiaries.

From  inception  and  up  through  September 2000, the Company was a development
stage  company  focused  on  gourmet  cheese  production  and  distribution. The
Company's  business  plan  during  this period consisted of organizing a gourmet
food  and  specialty  cheese  business  over  the  Internet.


<PAGE>
From  2000  to  2002  the  Company's  business  plan  consisted  of  the  use of
proprietary technologies to produce natural and stable enzymes, and the research
and  development  of  various  applications  for them.  On October 16, 2000, the
Company  acquired Duro Enzymes Products Inc, a private Nevada corporation formed
in  November  1999,  through  a  voluntary  share  exchange  with  all  of  the
shareholders  of  Duro  Enzymes Private. The former shareholders of Duro Enzymes
Private  now  hold  11,520,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The Company
effectively took control of all of the assets of Duro Enzymes Private, including
its  subsidiaries,  as  a  result of the voluntary share exchange and subsequent
merger  of  Duro  Enzymes  Private  into  the Company. Following the merger, the
Company  changed  the  focus  of  its  business  from  the  sales of gourmet and
specialty  cheeses  over  the  Internet  to its new business of gasification and
stable,  natural  enzyme  production. In connection with the change in business,
new  directors  and  executive  officers were appointed. The Company has carried
forward  an  accumulated  deficit  incurred  during  its  development  stage  of
$6,399,558  from  the  business of natural enzyme production and $1,349,077 from
the  business  of  gourmet  food  and  specialty  cheese.

Beginning  in  2003  the  Company began pursuing opportunities in the electronic
entertainment  industry.  The  Company  has undertaken the reorganization of its
corporate affairs in connection with the determination of the board of directors
to  pursue  business  opportunities  in  the  areas  of  electronic  computer
entertainment,  education,  music and other areas of the entertainment industry.
The  Company is pursuing several new business contracts and has been negotiating
with  new  business  partners on several new business lines in the entertainment
industry,  however  no  formal  agreements  have  been  reached  to  date.

RECENT  CORPORATE  DEVELOPMENTS

During  the past year, the Company's board of directors determined to change the
business  of the Company.  The Company is now pursuing business opportunities in
the  electronic  entertainment industry.  The Company has identified significant
opportunities  in  music,  education, video games and other entertainment areas.
The  Company's  plan  is  to  attract talented, creative and dedicated people by
creating  a  workplace  that  stimulates  creativity,  supports personal growth,
encourages  initiative,  and  rewards  performance.

The  recent  corporate  developments  of  the Company are summarized as follows:

1)   On  January  6,  2003  the  Company disposed of its wholly owned subsidiary
     Bruden Steaming and Vac Truck Services Ltd., as it was not in line with the
     new  business objectives of the Company. The Company sold the subsidiary to
     Mr. Dennis Branconnier, the original owner of Bruden Steaming and Vac Truck
     Service Ltd., in consideration of the transfer by Mr. Dennis Branconnier of
     1,200,000 (post-split) shares of the Company's common stock to the Company.
     These  returned  shares  are  the  shares  originally  issued to Mr. Dennis
     Branconnier  upon completion of the original acquisition of Bruden Steaming
     and  Vac  Truck  Service Ltd. by the Company from Mr. Dennis Branconnier on
     May  29,  2002.  The  board of directors determined that this business that
     would  not add value to the Company in the short or long-term and was not a
     good fit with the Company's direction. Mr. Dennis Branconnier is the nephew
     of  Mr.  Rene  Branconnier,  one  of  the  Company's  founders.

2)   The  board  of  directors  of  the  Company  determined  not  to pursue the
     development  of  the  stable  enzyme  production  technology  that had been
     licensed  to  it  by 529473 B.C. Ltd. (the "Licensor"). As a consequence of
     this  determination,  the Company entered into a termination agreement with
     the  Licensor  on May 5, 2003. Under the termination agreement, the Company
     has  agreed  to the termination of all license agreements with the Licensor
     and  in  consideration,  the Licensor has agreed to the cancellation of the
     promissory  note  made  by  the  Company  in  favor  of the Licensor in the
     principal  amount  of  $2,500,000  and  to  forgive  accrued  interest  of
     $284,244.05  under  the promissory note. The Company had conducted research
     of  the  stable  enzyme  technology but had not generated any revenues from
     this technology. The exchange of the promissory note and forgiveness of the
     accrued  interest for the termination of the license agreements resulted in
     the elimination of $2,752,738 of long-term liabilities and an extraordinary
     gain  on  license termination of $846,744. This extraordinary item has been
     recorded on the Company's financial statements for the year ended September
     30,  2003.


<PAGE>
3)   On  May 23, 2003, the Company had approved the change of the Company's name
     to "EAPI Entertainment, Inc.", a share rollback of 50 to 1 and an amendment
     to  the  articles of incorporation to decrease the authorized share capital
     to  500,000,000  common  shares.  These  actions  were  all approved by the
     written  consent  of  the  majority of the shareholders of the Company. The
     board  of  directors  proposed  the name change in order that the Company's
     name  more  accurately  reflect  the Company's products and business focus.

4)   On  October  29, 2003, the President of the Company Perry Smith resigned as
     the  President  and  Director.

5)   Mr.  Peter  Gardner  was  appointed  as  president and as a director of the
     Company  on  November  3,  2003.  Mr.  Gardner  has  over  twenty  years of
     experience  in  the  electronic  entertainment  industry.

INDUSTRY  BACKGROUND

The  Company's  initial  business  strategy  in  targeting  the  products in the
entertainment  industry is to develop video games and on-line education software
products.  The  video  game  and  on-line  education  industries  in which these
products  would  be  marketed  are  described  below:

VIDEO  GAMES

The video game industry began with the introduction of the home computer and the
dedicated video game machines in the early 1980's.  The first widespread game to
gain  acceptance  was  a tennis simulation known as Pong.  Since then, computers
and  game  machines have advanced dramatically, and the demand for entertainment
on  the  major  platforms  such as the PlayStation 2, the Xbox, the GameCube and
today's  home  computer  has  continually  increased.

The  video  game  industry  has  grown  to  the  point where major companies are
generating  more  revenue  than  any  other  sector  of  the  software industry.
Electronic  Arts is an example of a company that has grown over the years from a
small  production  house  to  a  major developer and distributor of video games.
This  company  alone  generates billions of dollars a year in the industry.  The
video game industry has grown so large, that even major successes like Microsoft
have  recently  thrown their hat into the ring.  Microsoft itself, over the past
few  years, has quickly grown its video game department to the point where it is
fast  catching  up to Electronic Arts itself as a major player in the video game
industry.  Other  major  industry  players  include  companies  such  as  Sony,
Nintendo,  Sega,  Infogrames  and  Activision.

Electronic  Arts,  Microsoft  and  other  large  production houses are currently
running  most  of  the  video  game industry.  They act as publishers, which are
approached  by  smaller game development companies for funding of their proposed
game products.  The publisher will view a demo prepared by the applicant, and if
approved, will fund development of the project.  The game project then undergoes
development,  and  is  delivered  in  a set of milestones.  If each milestone is
accepted  by  the  publisher,  then  funding for development goes on to the next
milestone,  until  the  Alpha or final milestone is reached.  At that point, the
game  is  considered  complete, but must go on to heavy testing and bug hunting.
This  phase is known as the Beta Stage.  Once the Beta Stage has been completed,
the  game  is  considered  final, and marketed and distributed by the publishing
company.  Often, the publishing company keeps most of the game revenue, with 20%
-  40%  returning  to  the  game  developer,  depending  on  their status in the
industry.

ON-LINE  EDUCATION

The  Online  Education  industry is far reaching, and has existed in one form or
another  for  years  now,  ever  since the Internet was originally introduced to
schools  and  government  installations.  Today,  there are many forms of online
education,  usually available to the consumer through a web-based interface.  In
other  words,  the  consumer  uses  his  web  browser  to access the educational
material  on  a  website  for  a  fee.


<PAGE>
Traditionally  in  the  industry,  a  software  company,  or an online education
company,  creates  a  software package that is designed to be used as a template
for educational use.  The client institution purchases this software often along
with a service contract in which the company creates the lessons for the client,
using  the  software.  If the client is experienced in software development, the
client  will sometimes develop the online courses itself with this software.  In
all  cases, this software is then published to a website where it is accessed by
the  consumer.

Colleges  and  Universities  even  now offer many programs through the Internet,
however  many  of  these  programs  are  unsatisfactory at one level or another.
Often  the  software  that runs the programs is too generic, and the educational
material  must  be  redesigned to suit the inflexible structure of such systems.
Other  times,  the educational materials themselves are too lightweight, and act
only  as introductions to courses that must actually be taken by the consumer in
person.

One  fact  remains  clear  and constant: there is a huge demand for this form of
education.  Consumers  desire  a  means of educating themselves effectively from
the  comfort  of  their  own  homes, without the expensive commutes and boarding
costs  that  are  necessary  when  using  conventional  educational  methods.

BUSINESS  STRATEGY

VIDEO  GAMES

The  Company has determined through research in the industry that there are many
potentially  successful  video  game  development  projects  out  there  in
mid-completion,  but  which  lack  the  funding  either  to develop them to full
completion,  or  to  effectively  market  and  distribute them nation-wide.  The
Company plans to seek out these video game projects through the many established
avenues available in the industry.  When a video game project is identified, the
Company  plans  to complete a review of the video game project and an assessment
of  its  commercial  potential.  If  the  Company  believes  that the video game
project  has  commercial  potential,  the  Company  will make a determination of
whether  to  fund  the  completion  of  the development and the marketing of the
project.  Any determination to fund a video game project would be subject to the
Company  obtaining  sufficient financing in order to fund the project and to the
negotiation  with a funding agreement with the project developer.  The Company's
objective  would  be to recover its investment from sales of the video game once
commercialization  had  completed  and  marketing  and sales had commenced.  The
Company's  strategy  would  be  to  earn the returns of a game publisher without
incurring  all  of  the  upfront  cost  of  the development of video games.  The
Company's ability to pursue the development of any video games is subject to the
Company  achieving  additional  financing,  of  which  there  is  no  assurance.

Additionally,  the  Company  plans  to  develop  its  own  video games using two
separate  computer  software  game  engines  that  are  currently  owned  by the
Company's  president,  Mr.  Peter Gardener.  These two game engines are known as
Adam  and  Genesis and have been developed by Mr. Gardner.  The Company plans to
enter into agreements with Mr. Gardener whereby the Company would acquire rights
use  and  develop  the  computer software engines.  To date, the Company has not
entered  into any agreements with Mr. Gardener regarding either Adam or Genesis.
Accordingly,  the  rights  that the Company may acquire with respect to Adam and
Genesis have not been defined and the obligations of the Company with respect to
Adam  and  Genesis  have  not  been  agreed  upon.

The  Company  plans  to acquire access to the Adam and Genesis computer software
engines  in order to use these as blueprint designs for game development engines
that  will  allow  its  own  development  staff  to  design  and create dynamic,
entertaining  video  games  quickly  and  effectively.  These engine designs are
planned  to  be the exclusive property of the Company, subject to negotiation of
the  rights to the software engines.  The Company's strategy in acquiring rights
to  the  software  engines  is  to  give  the Company a competitive advantage in
developing  successful game products to be marketed and distributed nation-wide.


<PAGE>
As  no agreements have been entered into, there is no assurance that the Company
will  acquire  rights  to  the  Adam  and  Genesis  software  engines.

The  Adam  software engine is a software engine that would allow the development
of  stand-alone  computer video games using sophisticated design and programming
techniques,  along  with  cutting  edge  artwork  and  sound  management.

The  Genesis  software  engine  is currently partly complete. When finished, the
Genesis  software  engine  is planned to support on-line video games that can be
played  online  by  many  consumers  at  once.  This  type  of  game is called a
Multiplayer Online Game, or MOG.  These games are purchased like any other video
game,  but  in  addition  to  the  purchase  price,  the consumer pays a monthly
subscription  fee to continue playing in the online world.  These types of games
have  had  a massive surge in popularity recently.  The most successful of these
MOG  video  games  is  currently  EverQuest.

Once  the  development  of  the Genesis software engine is complete, the Company
plans  to  develop  an  online  multiplayer  game  called Genesis, which will be
developed  with  the  Genesis  engine.

The  Company  plans  to  assemble  highly  skilled  software  developers,  audio
technicians  and graphic artists to design and develop its engine technology and
its  final  game  products.  It will also gather marketing and promotional staff
necessary  to  get  its  products out into the marketplace and recognized by the
consumer.

The  Company's  plan  is to initially develop two to three of these products per
year,  subject  to  the  Company obtaining the necessary financing.  The Company
plans to increase the number of computer game products developed in each year as
the  Company's  business  grows.

ON-LINE  EDUCATION

The  Company  is  currently  developing  computer  software  to  deliver on-line
education  programs  that  it  refers  to  as  the  "EASI-Learning"  software.
EASI-Learning  software  will  be  developed  with software engines specifically
designed  to  generate  customized  online  educational software for the client.
Once  development  of this computer software is complete, the Company's business
strategy  will  be to have educational clients supply the education content that
it  wants  its  students to learn and to incorporate this education content into
its proprietary software in order to deliver a software product that is tailored
to  each  client's  needs  and requirements.  The objective of the EASI-Learning
software will be to ensure that each client institution gets exactly the type of
educational  program  it  needs.

The  Company plans to employ the talents of a sophisticated software development
and  graphic  artist staff to create and utilize software engines to produce the
Company's  final  product.  The client will supply the course content upon which
the  EASI-Learning  software  will be based.  The planned result will be a fully
comprehensive,  online  educational  program  that  is  tailored  to  the client
institution's  exact  needs,  style  and  format.

The  Company  plans do not require any upfront development fees from the client.
Instead,  the  Company  plans  to enter into joint partnerships with each client
whereby  the  Company  will  share  in  the  revenues  generated by the finished
product.  In  this  way,  the  Company  plans  to  encourage  the development of
educational  software products, and to earn revenues once the development of the
educational  software  products is complete.   In order to achieve this business
strategy,  the  Company  will  require additional financing in order to fund the
up-front  cost  of  developing  each  educational  software  product.

The  Company  currently  is  in  talks  with two potential clients.  The Alberta
Construction  Safety  Association  (ACSA)  has  approved  EAPI  in their initial
assessment,  and  has indicated to the Company that it is prepared to move ahead
to  the  next  step.  Rural  Roots  is  an  Alberta based agricultural and rural
educational group that is considering engaging the Company to provide the online
training  for  its  virtual university, which compliments its other agricultural
training  and  recreational  programs.


<PAGE>
The  Company  continues  to  pursue  the  development of an educational software
program  that  would enable the delivery of on-line safety courses to members of
the  construction  trades  in  the province of Alberta, Canada.  The Company has
retained  consultants to enable it to complete the preliminary work necessary to
submit a proposal to develop and deliver the educational programs.  The proposal
was  submitted  to  a  government  owned  agency,  ACSA, that has the mandate of
delivering  safety  education  to  workers in the Alberta construction industry.
The Company's bid was submitted May 8, 2003.  The government agency continues to
work  with  the Company.  There is no assurance that the Company's proposal will
be  accepted  but the contract has not been awarded.  If the Company's letter of
intent  were  accepted,  the  Company  would  be required to deliver the on-line
educational programs in 2004.  The Company anticipates that it would retain some
of  the  consultants  it  has worked with to develop the preliminary proposal to
complete  this work.  The Company would require additional financing in order to
enable  it  to  complete  and  deliver  the  on-line  educational program if its
proposal  is  accepted.

The  Company  continues  to  develop  an educational software program that would
deliver  on-line  agricultural  educational courses through existing educational
facilities  in  Alberta,  Canada for Rural Roots.  The Company is working with a
group  in  Alberta,  Canada  to  prepare a joint proposal.  The Company would be
required  to  retain  additional  consultants  to  enable  it  to  complete  the
preliminary  work  necessary  to  submit  a  proposal to develop and deliver the
educational  programs.  To  date, the Company has not submitted any proposal and
has  not  entered  into  any  agreement for the delivery of educational software
programs  to  the  targeted  educational  institution.

EASI  STUDIOS

If  the  Company  is successful in its initial endeavors into the development of
video  game  and  education  software  programs,  the Company plans to develop a
studio,  to  be  known  as  the EASI Studios, to house the Company's development
teams  and  their  equipment and infrastructure.  The EASI Studios would contain
computer  development hardware, software, audio equipment, management facilities
and  support  staff  and  facilities  to  keep  operations  running  smoothly.

STATUS  OF  BUSINESS  DEVELOPMENT

The  Company's  endeavours  into  the  areas  of  software  development, on-line
education  software  and  electronic  entertainment  remain  preliminary.  No
businesses or assets have been acquired by the Company and there is no assurance
that  any  business  or  assets  will  be  acquired.  In  addition,  the Company
contemplates that it will have to raise substantial financing in order to pursue
any  new business activities.  There is no assurance that any required financing
will be achieved.   If the Company does enter into an agreement to acquire a new
business or assets, the Company contemplates that shareholders will not have the
opportunity  to  vote  on  the  transaction in view of the fact that shareholder
approval  would not be required under the Company's governing corporate statute,
Chapter  78  of  the  Nevada  Revised  Statutes entitled "Private Corporations".

COMPETITION

If  the  Company is successful in developing any video games, its products would
compete against the video game products of established competitors such as Sony,
Nintendo  and  Electronic  Arts.  The  Company's  competitors have substantially
greater  financial  resources, experience in the areas of video game development
and marketing and have established distribution networks.  There is no assurance
that  the  Company  will be able to compete with established video game products
and  manufacturers  even  in  the  Company  is  successful  in  completing  the
development  of  any video game products.  The Company plans to complete against
established competition in the video game by designing games that are unique and
innovative.

The  Company  will  be  competing against established competitors in the on-line
education  market.  These  established  competitors  have  substantially greater
financial  resources,  brand-name  recognition,  goodwill  and experience in the
design  and  delivery  of  on-line  education  programs.  Further  educational
institutions  may  be  unwilling to enter into development agreements with a new


<PAGE>
company such as the Company which does not have a track-record in the design and
delivery  of on-line education programs.  There is no assurance that the Company
will  be able to convince educational institutions to enter into agreements with
the  Company  rather  than  its  competitors  due  to  these  factors.

INTELLECTUAL  PROPERTY  PROTECTION

The  Company's performance and ability to compete are dependent to a significant
degree  on  the  Company's  ability  to develop and acquire proprietary software
technology  and  to  continually  protect  any  proprietary  technology  that is
developed  or  acquired.  The  Company  plans  to  rely  upon  a  combination of
trademark,  copyright  and  trade  secret  laws,  as  well  as  confidentiality
agreements  and  non-compete agreements executed by employees and consultants as
measures  to  establish  and  protect  the  Company's  proprietary  rights.

EMPLOYEES

As  of  December  16, 2003, the Company had one employee and eleven consultants.
Of those employees and consultants, three were classified as executive officers,
five  as  administrative personnel, and four sales and marketing.  The Company's
consultants and employees do not belong to a collective bargaining unit, and the
Company  is  not  aware  of  any  labor  union organizing activity.  The Company
believes  its future success will depend in large part on its continuing ability
to  attract,  train  and retain skilled technical, sales, marketing and customer
support  personnel.


<PAGE>
ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION  OF  PROPERTY

The  Company  leases its principal executive office, consisting of approximately
12,000  square  feet,  at  a  monthly  rate  of $9,687.  The Company's principal
executive  office  is  located  at  201 - 20436 Fraser Highway, Langley, British
Columbia,  Canada,  V3A  4G2.  The  Company's  lease for its principal executive
office  expires  on  January  31, 2006 with an option to renew for an additional
three  years.  The  Company's  premises  are  adequate for the Company's current
business  operations.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL  PROCEEDINGS

The  Company  was  named  in  a legal suit filed in the Supreme Court of British
Columbia on November 20, 2001.  The suit has been filed against the Company, its
officers  and  directors,  and  others,  by  Thermo  Tech  Technologies Inc. and
subsidiaries  (collectively  "Thermo  Tech"). There are a total of 75 defendants
named  in  the  suit. The Company intends to deny the substance of Thermo Tech's
allegations.  The  Company  has filed an appearance and defense with the Supreme
Court  of  British  Columbia  and continues to defend its formal technical legal
response  in  conjunction  with  its  legal  counsel.

Thermo  Tech  alleges  that  the  Company  and  its  officers and directors have
appropriated,  or  in  the  alternative  attempted  to  appropriate,  corporate
opportunities  from  Thermo  Tech  through  the unauthorized use of confidential
information  and  trade  secrets  owned  by  the Thermo Tech. As a result of the
alleged  unlawful  actions of the Company and its officers and directors, Thermo
Tech  claims that they have suffered loss, damage and expense. In the prayer for
relief,  Thermo  Tech  seeks  the  following  relief  from  the  court:

     -    An  injunction against the Company from unlawfully marketing and using
          the  Thermo  Tech  Process  (defined  in  the  Statement of Claim as a
          process  that  incorporates  the  use  of  thermophilic,  aerobic
          microorganisms  which produce enzymes in a multiple stage fermentation
          process  to  create  high  protein  animal  feed  from organic waste);
     -    Damages  for  unlawfully  marketing and using the Thermo Tech Process;
     -    Damages  for interference with the Thermo Tech' contractual relations;
     -    Damages for appropriation of the Thermo Tech' corporate opportunities;
     -    Punitive  damages;
     -    Exemplary  damages;  and
     -    Special  costs,  or  in  the  alternative,  increased  costs.

The  Company believes that Thermo Tech's allegations against it have no basis in
fact,  and  are  without merit, as the Company does not use any of Thermo Tech's
processes.  The  Company intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit and to assert
all  appropriate  counterclaims.  Due to the complexities of the lawsuit and the
contractual  and  other  relationships  between  the parties to the lawsuit, the
Company  cannot  predict  what  the  outcome of the lawsuit may be or reasonably
estimate  the  financial  effect  associated  with  it.

As  of  May  5, 2003 the Company has terminated its License agreement related to
the  technology  alleged  by  Thermo  Tech  Technologies  Inc.  to  have  been
appropriated.  The  Company  now  has  no  interest  in any of the technology in
dispute  in  the  lawsuit  and  never  generated any revenue from the terminated
license  or  the  technology.

On  June  25,  2003  in the Supreme Court of British Columbia the Honourable Mr.
Justice  Groberman required Thermo Tech to post, $170,000 CDN into court by July
25,  2003  as  securities for cost towards all the defendants costs.  To date no
security  has been placed into court and as of July 25, 2003 the proceedings are
stayed.

On  January  31,  2004  a settlement agreement was reached in this lawsuit.  The
settlement  is  scheduled  to  close  on  March 19, 2004 and the Company will be
released  from  all  liability in this matter.  The Company had not expected any
liability  and  therefore  had  not  made  any  accrual.


<PAGE>
The  Company  was  named  in  a  lawsuit  on April 23, 2002.  The suit was filed
against it and its subsidiary Duro Enzyme Solutions Inc. by a former officer and
director of the company. The lawsuit is for alleged unpaid monies, in the amount
of  $28,555.  The  Company  feels that this allegation is without merit and will
defend  this  action  accordingly.

Except  as  described  above,  to  the  knowledge  of  the  Company's  executive
management  and directors, neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are party to
any other legal proceeding or litigation and none of its property is the subject
of  a  pending legal proceeding and the executive officers and directors know of
no  other  threatened  or  contemplated  legal  proceedings  or  litigation.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION  OF  MATTERS  TO  A  VOTE  OF  SECURITY  HOLDERS

No  matters  were  submitted to the Company's security holders for a vote during
the  fiscal  quarter  ended  September  30,  2003.


<PAGE>
                                     PART II

ITEM 5.     MARKET  FOR  COMMON  EQUITY  AND  RELATED  STOCKHOLDER  MATTERS

The Company's common stock is traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the
"OTC  BB")  under  the  symbol "EPEI".  The Company's trading symbol was changed
from  "DEPI" to "EPEI" in May 2003 concurrent with the Company's change of name.

The  following  table  sets  forth,  the range of high and low bid prices of the
Company's  common  stock  for  the  last  two fiscal years of actual trading, as
reported  by  the  OTC  BB:.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------  ----------  ---------
FISCAL QUARTER     HIGH ($)*   LOW ($)*
-----------------  ----------  ---------
<S>                <C>         <C>
1st  Quarter 2002  $    11.50  $    5.63
-----------------  ----------  ---------
2nd Quarter 2002   $    10.63  $    3.25
-----------------  ----------  ---------
3rd Quarter 2002   $     1.50  $    1.00
-----------------  ----------  ---------
4th Quarter 2002   $     0.50  $    0.38
-----------------  ----------  ---------
1st Quarter 2003   $     0.50  $    0.20
-----------------  ----------  ---------
2nd Quarter 2003   $     0.50  $    0.08
-----------------  ----------  ---------
3rd Quarter 2003   $     0.45  $    0.15
-----------------  ----------  ---------
4th Quarter 2003   $     0.55  $    0.14
-----------------  ----------  ---------
<FN>
* The pricing information was provided by the OTC Bulletin Board.  All prices are
adjusted for the 50 to 1 reverse split which occurred on May 23, 2003.
</TABLE>

The  trades  reflect  inter-dealer  prices,  without retail mark-up, markdown or
commission  and  may  not  represent  actual  transactions.

On  March  4,  2004,  the  Company's issued and outstanding common stock totaled
13,155,560  shares,  held  by  approximately 50 shareholders of record and by an
undetermined  number  of  additional shareholders through nominee or street name
accounts  with  brokers.

The  Company  has  not  paid  dividends  in  prior years and has no plans to pay
dividends  in the near future.  The Company intends to reinvest its earnings, if
any  are  achieved,  in the continued development and operation of its business.
Any  payment  of  dividends  would  depend upon the Company's pattern of growth,
profitability,  financial  condition,  and  such  other  factors as the Board of
Directors  may  deem  relevant.

RECENT  SALES  OF  UNREGISTERED  SECURITIES

The  Company  did  not  issue  any  securities  without  registration  under the
Securities  Act  of  1933  during  its  fiscal  year  ended  September 30, 2003.


<PAGE>
ITEM 6.  MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OR PLAN OF
         OPERATIONS

The  following  discussion  should  be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial  statements  included  herein. Certain statements contained herein may
constitute  forward-looking  statements, as discussed at the beginning of Part I
of  this Annual Report. Because such statements include risks and uncertainties,
actual  results  may  differ  materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking  statements.  Factors  that  could  cause  or contribute to such
differences  include  those discussed in the "Risk Factors" section of this Form
10-KSB.

At  the  year ended September 30, 2003, EAPI Entertainment, Inc. is now pursuing
business  opportunities  in  the  electronic  entertainment  industry.

PLAN  OF  OPERATIONS

The  Company's  plan  of  operation  for the next twelve months is summarized as
follows:

1.   The  Company plans to negotiate for the acquisition of the Adam and Genesis
     computer  engines  and  to  continue the development of video game products
     incorporating  these  computer  engines. The Company estimates that it will
     expend  an  additional  $300,000  on  these  projects  over the next twelve
     months.

2.   The  Company plans to continue its bid to deliver an on-line safety courses
     to  members  of the construction trades in the province of Alberta, Canada.
     If the Company's proposal is accepted, the Company anticipates that it will
     expend  approximately  $400,000  to  complete and deliver the work required
     under  the  contract  over  the  next  twelve  months.

3.   The  Company plans to pursue an agreement with Rural Roots for the delivery
     of  on-line  agricultural  educational courses through existing educational
     facilities  in  Alberta,  Canada.  The  Company's proposal is accepted, the
     Company  anticipates  that  it  will expend approximately $500,000 over the
     next  twelve  months.

4.   If  the  Company  is  successful in its initial endeavours to develop video
     games  and  on-line  education  programs,  the  Company plans to pursue the
     development  of  the  EASI  Studio.  Costs  of  development  of the studio,
     including  equipment  and  infrastructure  costs,  are  expected  to  be
     approximately  $600,000.

In the next twelve months the Company estimates that it will spend approximately
$2,500,000  in  pursuing  its  stated  plan  of  operations.  Of  this  amount
approximately  $700,000  will  be  comprised of overhead expenses and $1,800,000
will  be  comprised of production and development work in video game and on-line
educational  software and the EASI Studio.   The actual expenditures will depend
on whether the Company is awarded any contracts for on-line educational training
and whether the Company is able to undertake the development of any video games.
The  Company's  requirements  are expected to increase if the Company is able to
enter into agreements that would enable it to pursue the development of computer
entertainment  games.   There  is  no assurance that the Company will be able to
obtain  the  necessary  financing  to  pursue  its plan of operations due to its
limited  cash  reserves  and  its working capital deficit.  The Company does not
have  any arrangements in place for any financing and there is no assurance that
any  arrangements  for  financing  will  be  entered  into.

OPERATING  COSTS  AND  EXPENSES
-------------------------------

The  Company  incurred  total  operating  expenses of $1,220,917 during the year
ended  September  30,  2003,  which  was  a  decrease of $708,063 over operating
expenses  of  $1,928,980 incurred by the Company during the year ended September
30,  2002.  As  a result of the discontinuation of the Enzyme business, $352,257
in  the  current  year and $1,104,408 the previous year in operating cost of the
Enzyme  business  were  regrouped  into  discontinued  operations.


<PAGE>
An analysis of the major operating items shows the following changes:

Consulting  and  professional  fees  increased  to  $673,455  from  $488,258 the
previous  period  as  a  result  of  the  use  of additional consultants in both
education  and  Computer  game areas of the Company increasing total consultants
from  eleven  to  a  maximum  of  twenty  two.

Office and administration decreased to $42,542 from $220,032 the previous period
as  a  result  of  the  elimination  of several contracts and the closing of one
office  during  the  year.

Rent,  utilities  and telephone increased to $145,814 from $113,050 the previous
period  by  increased  telephone  use  as  the  company  began marketing its new
business.

The  Company  does  expect  to  increase  costs  in  the  next  fiscal  year  in
anticipation  of  the  growing  new  business.


LIQUIDITY  AND  CAPITAL  RESOURCES

The  Company  had  cash  of $38,995 as of September 30, 2003 compared to cash of
$(1,262) as of September 30, 2002.  The Company had a working capital deficit of
$3,602,886  as  of  September  30, 2003 compared to a working capital deficit of
$1,947,607  as of September 30, 2002.  As of September 30, 2003, the Company had
a  net  stockholders'  deficit of $3,620,941, with accumulated losses during the
development  stage  of  $8,419,410  including  a  loss  of $1,329,862 during the
current  year.  Due to the Company's substantial working capital deficit and its
current  inability  to generate revenues, there is no assurance that the Company
will  be  able  to  continue  as a going concern or achieve material revenues or
profitable  operations.  In  addition,  there can be no guarantee that financing
adequate  to  carry  out  the Company's business plan will be available on terms
acceptable  to  the  Company,  or  at  all.

No material commitments for capital expenditures were made during the year ended
September  30,  2003.

On  May  5,  2003,  the  Company  agreed  to  terminate  the Duro Enzyme License
agreement  and all liabilities associated with the license were eliminated.  The
Note  Payable  of  $2,500,000 and the accrued interest of $284,244 were forgiven
and  the  Company  has no further rights to use the technology.  The Recovery on
the  License  termination  has  been  recorded  in  the  financial statements in
additional  paid  in  capital.

The  Company  owes  the  following  amounts  to related parties, as described in
greater  detail  in  Item  12  of  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------  -------------------------  -------------------------
CREDITOR                     AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2002   AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
---------------------------  -------------------------  -------------------------
<S>                          <C>                        <C>
Brampton Holdings Ltd.       $                 304,886  $                 554,168
---------------------------  -------------------------  -------------------------
Sanclair Holdings Ltd.       $                 307,512  $                 585,458
---------------------------  -------------------------  -------------------------
Pacific Ocean Resources      $                 273,305  $                 847,674
Corporation
---------------------------  -------------------------  -------------------------
529473 B.C. Ltd.             $                 173,944  $                 150,790
---------------------------  -------------------------  -------------------------
Earthscape Maintenance Ltd.  $                 575,342  $                 759,387
---------------------------  -------------------------  -------------------------
TOTAL:                       $               1,634,989  $               2,897,477
---------------------------  -------------------------  -------------------------
</TABLE>

The  Company  will require additional financing in order to enable it to proceed
with  its plan of operations, as discussed above under Plan of Operations.   The
Company  anticipates that it will require approximately $2,500,000 over the next
twelve months to finance its stated plan of operations.  These cash requirements
are  in  excess  of  the  Company's  current cash and working capital resources.
Accordingly,  the Company will require additional financing in order to continue
operations.  The  Company  plans  to  complete  an  equity  financing  or equity
financing's  through  a private placement of the Company's common stock in order
to  raise  the funds necessary to enable the Company to proceed with its plan of
operations.   The  Company  has  no  arrangements  in  place  for any additional


<PAGE>
financing  and  there is no assurance that the Company will achieve the required
additional  funding.  There  is  no  assurance  that  any  party  will  advance
additional  funds  to  the  Company in order to enable it to sustain its plan of
operations.

Consulting  fees  of  $762,215  were  outstanding and unpaid as of September 30,
2003.  Thirteen  (13)  of the Twenty-two (22) consulting companies were owned or
controlled  by  creditors  and/or  shareholders,  provided  consulting services,
expertise,  and  knowledge  to  the  Company  during  the  period.

The  Company  plans  to utilize a combination of internally generated funds from
operations  and potential debt and / or equity financing to fund its longer-term
growth  over a period of two to five years, subject to the Company obtaining the
necessary business assets to achieve this financing.  The availability of future
financing  will depend on market conditions.  The forecast of the period of time
through  which  the  Company's  financial  resources will be adequate to support
operations is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties.
The actual funding requirements may differ materially from this as a result of a
number  of  factors  including  plans  to  rapidly  expand  its  new operations.

The  forecast  of  the  period  of  time  through  which the Company's financial
resources  will be adequate to support operations is a forward-looking statement
that  involves  risks  and  uncertainties.  The  actual funding requirements may
differ  materially  from this as a result of a number of factors including plans
to  rapidly  expand its new operations. There can be no guarantee that financing
adequate  to  carry  out  the Company's business plan will be available on terms
acceptable  to  the  Company,  or  at  all.


<PAGE>
EFFECT  OF  FLUCTUATIONS  IN  FOREIGN  EXCHANGE  RATES

The Company's reporting and functional currency is the US dollar. Currently, all
of  the  Company's  operations  are  located in Canada. Transactions in Canadian
dollars  have  been  translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method,
such  that  assets  and  liabilities  are translated at the rates of exchange in
effect  at the balance sheet date and revenue and expenses are translated at the
average rates of exchange during the appropriate fiscal period. As a result, the
carrying  value of the Company's investments in Canada is subject to the risk of
foreign  currency  fluctuations.  Additionally,  any  revenues received from the
Company's international operations in other than U.S. dollars will be subject to
foreign  exchange  risk.

RECENT  ACCOUNTING  PRONOUNCEMENTS

In  January  2003,  (as  revised  in  December  2003)  The  Financial Accounting
Standards  Board  ("FASB")  issued  Interpretation  No.  46,  "Consolidation  of
Variable  Interest  Entities", an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin
("ARB")  No.  51.  "Consolidated  Financial  Statements".  Interpretation No. 46
addresses  consolidation  by business enterprises of variable interest entities,
which  have  one  or  both  of  the  following  characteristics:  (i) the equity
investment  at  risk  is  not  sufficient  to  permit  the entity to finance its
activities  without additional subordinated support from other parties, which is
provided  through  other  interest  that will absorb some or all of the expected
losses  of  the  entity;  (ii)  the entity the investors lack one or more of the
following  essential  characteristics  of  a controlling financial interest: the
direct  or  indirect  ability  to  make  decisions about the entities activities
through  voting  rights  or  similar  rights;  or  the  obligation to absorb the
expected  losses  of  the  entity if they occur, which makes it possible for the
entity  if  they  occur, which is the compensation for the risk of absorbing the
expected  losses.

Interpretation  No.  46,  as  revised, also requires expanded disclosures by the
primary  beneficiary  (as  defined)  of  a  variable  interest  entity and by an
enterprise  that  holds  a  significant variable interest in a variable interest
entity  but  is  not  the  primary  beneficiary.

Interpretation  No.  46,  as revised, applies to small business issuers no later
than  the  end  of the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2004.
The  effective  date  includes  those  entities  to  which Interpretation 46 had
previously  had  previously applied.  However, prior to the required application
of  Interpretation  46,  a  public  entity that is a small business issuer shall
apply  Interpretation  46  or  this  Interpretation  to  those entities that are
considered  to  be  special-purpose  entities no later than as of the end of the
first  reporting  period  that  ends  after  December  15,  2003.

Interpretation  No.  46  may  be  applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect
adjustment  as  of the date which it is first applied or by restating previously
issued  financial  of  the  first  year  restated.

In  December  2002,  the  FASB  issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation  -  Transition  and Disclosure".  SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting  for  Stock-Based  Compensation",  to provide alternative methods of
transition  for  a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting
for  stock-based  employee  compensation.  In  addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both
annual  and  interim  financial  statements  about  the method of accounting for
stock-based  employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported
results.  SFAS  No.  148  is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2002.  The interim disclosure provisions are effective for financial reports
containing financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15,
2002.  The  adoption  of  SFAS  No. 148 did not have a significant effect on the
Company's  financial  statement  presentation  or  disclosures.

In  April  2003,  the  FASB  issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities".  SFAS  No.  149  amends  and
clarifies  financial  accounting  and  reporting  for  derivative  instruments,
including  certain  derivative  instruments  embedded  in  other  contracts
(collectively  referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS
No.  133,  "Accounting  for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities".  The
changes  in SFAS No. 149 improve financial reporting by requiring that contracts
with  comparable  characteristics be accounted for similarly.  This statement is


<PAGE>
effective  for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and all of
its  provisions  should  be  applied  prospectively.

In  May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  ("SFAS")  No. 150, "Accounting For Certain
Financial  Instruments  with  Characteristics  of  both Liabilities and Equity".
SFAS  No.  150  changes  the  accounting  for certain financial instruments with
characteristics  of  both  liabilities  and  equity  that,  under  previous
pronouncements,  issuers  could  account  for  as  equity.  The  new  accounting
guidance contained in SFAS No. 150 requires that those instruments be classified
as  liabilities  in  the  balance  sheet.

SFAS  No.  150  affects  the issuer's accounting for three types of freestanding
financial  instruments.  One  type  is  mandatorily redeemable shares, which the
issuing  company  is obligated to buy back in exchange for cash or other assets.
A  second  type  includes  put  options  and  forward  purchase contracts, which
involves  instruments  that do or may require the issuer to buy back some of its
shares in exchange for cash or other assets.  The third type of instruments that
are  liabilities  under  this  Statement is obligations that can be settled with
shares,  the monetary value of which is fixed, tied solely or predominantly to a
variable  such  as  a  market  index,  or varies inversely with the value of the
issuers'  shares.  SFAS  No.  150  does  not  apply  to  features  embedded in a
financial  instrument  that  is  not  a  derivative  in  its  entirety.

Most  of  the  provisions  of  Statement  150  are  consistent with the existing
definition  of  liabilities  in  FASB  Concepts  Statement  No.  6, "Elements of
Financial  Statements".  The  remaining  provisions  of  this  Statement  are
consistent  with  the  FASB's  proposal  to  revise that definition to encompass
certain  obligations  that  a reporting entity can or must settle by issuing its
own shares.  This Statement shall be effective for financial instruments entered
into  or  modified  after  May  31, 2003 and otherwise shall be effective at the
beginning  of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for
mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of a non-public entity, as to which
the  effective  date  is  for  fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2004.

RISK  FACTORS

Shareholders  and  prospective  purchasers  of the Company's Common Stock should
carefully  consider  the  following  risk  factors  in  addition  to  the  other
information  appearing  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB.

THE  COMPANY  MAY  ACQUIRE UNRELATED BUSINESS AND CHANGE ITS CURRENT OPERATIONS.

The  Company  is  currently  looking  at  other  business  models  and  business
operations.  These  new  operations may be materially different from the current
business  model  and operation that currently exist.  Any change in the business
operations  may  materially  affect  the  Company's  share  price  and  revenue
generation  ability.

THE  COMPANY MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL EQUITY FINANCING, WHICH MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE
AND  MAY  DILUTE  THE  OWNERSHIP  INTERESTS  OF  INVESTORS.

The  Company's  ultimate  success will depend on its ability to raise additional
capital.  No  commitments  to  provide  additional  funds  have  been  made  by
management  or  other  shareholders.  The  Company  has  not  investigated  the
availability,  source  or  terms that might govern the acquisition of additional
financing.  When  additional capital is needed, there is no assurance that funds
will be available from any source or, if available, that they can be obtained on
terms acceptable to the Company.  If unavailable, the Company's operations could
be  severely limited, and it may not be able to implement its business plan.  If
equity  financing  is  used  to  raise additional working capital, the ownership
interests  of  existing  shareholders  may  be  diluted.


<PAGE>
THE  COMPANY'S  OPERATING  RESULTS  ARE  LIKELY TO FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY WHICH
COULD  INCREASE  THE  VOLATILITY  OF  ITS  STOCK  PRICE.

As a result of the Company's limited operating history and the planned expansion
of  its  business  operations,  the  Company's quarterly and annual revenues and
operating  results  are  likely  to  fluctuate  from period to period.  For this
reason,  you  should  not  rely on period-to-period comparisons of the Company's
financial  results  as  indications  of  future  results.  The  Company's future
operating results could fall below the expectations of public market analysts or
investors  and  significantly  reduce  the  market  price  of  its common stock.
Fluctuations in the Company's operating results could increase the volatility of
its  stock  price.

THE  COMPANY'S  DEPENDENCE  ON  RELATIONSHIPS  WITH  BUSINESSES  AND GOVERNMENTS
OUTSIDE  OF  THE  UNITED STATES MAY NEGATIVELY AFFECT ITS ABILITY TO OPERATE ITS
BUSINESS  AS  PLANNED.

The  Company  depends  on  its  ability  to  establish  and  maintain successful
relationships  with  businesses  and  governments  located outside of the United
States.  If  the Company is unable to establish and maintain such relationships,
it will not be able to implement the business plan in its current configuration,
which  will  affect  both its revenue stream and profit potential.  In addition,
the  Company  faces  political  sovereign  risks  of  conducting  international
business,  including  risks  of  changing  economic conditions, which may have a
material  adverse  effect  on  its  ability  to  expand its operations globally.


THE COMPANY DEPENDS UPON A SMALL NUMBER OF KEY PERSONS TO IMPLEMENT ITS BUSINESS
PLAN,  AND  THE  LOSS  OF  ANY  OF  THEM  MAY  AFFECT  ITS  BUSINESS OPERATIONS.

The  Company  is  dependent on several key consultants to implement its business
plan,  and  the  loss of any of them may affect the Company's ability to provide
the  required  quality of service and technical support necessary to achieve and
maintain  a  competitive  market  position. There is no assurance that these key
employees  and  consultants will continue to manage the Company's affairs in the
future.  The  Company  has not obtained key man insurance with respect to any of
its  consultants.

THE  COMPANY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY MANAGE ITS GROWTH WHICH COULD HAVE A
MATERIAL  EFFECT  ON  ITS  BUSINESS  OPERATIONS.

The  Company's  ability to manage its growth depends in part upon its ability to
develop and expand operating, management, information and financial systems, and
production  capacity,  which  may  significantly  increase  its future operating
expenses.  No  assurance can be given that it will grow in the future or that it
will  be  able  to  effectively manage such growth.  Its inability to manage its
growth  successfully  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect on its business,
financial  condition and results of operations.  The Company cannot successfully
implement its business model if it fails to manage its growth. The Company plans
to  rapidly  and  significantly  expanded  its  operations  domestically  and
internationally  and  anticipates  further expansion to take advantage of market
opportunities.

CONCENTRATION  OF OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES MAY
REDUCE  THE  CONTROL  BY  OTHER  SHAREHOLDERS  OVER  THE  COMPANY.

The Company's directors, officers and other control persons own or exercise full
or  partial  control  over  more  than 15.8% of the Company's outstanding common
stock.  As  a result, other investors in the Company's common stock may not have
much  influence  on corporate decision-making. In addition, the concentration of
control  over  the  Company's  common  stock  among the insiders could prevent a
change  in  control  of  the  Company.

THE  COMPANY'S  COMMON  STOCK IS CONSIDERED A "PENNY STOCK", WHICH MAKES IT MORE
DIFFICULT  TO  SELL  THAN  AN  EXCHANGE-TRADED  STOCK.


<PAGE>
The  Company's securities are subject to the SEC rule that imposes special sales
practice  requirements  upon  broker-dealers  that sell such securities to other
than  established  customers  or accredited investors. For purposes of the rule,
the  phrase  "accredited  investor"  means,  in general terms, institutions with
assets  exceeding  $5,000,000  or  individuals  having  net  worth  in excess of
$1,000,000  or  having an annual income that exceeds $200,000 (or that, combined
with a spouse's income, exceeds $300,000). For transactions covered by the rule,
the  broker-dealer  must  make  a  special  suitability  determination  for  the
purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction prior
to  the sale. Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of purchasers of the
Company's securities to buy or sell in any market that may develop.

In addition, the SEC has adopted a number of rules to regulate "penny stocks" (a
"penny  stock" is any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00
per  share  or  with  an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to
certain  exceptions).  Such  rules  include  Rules  3a51-1, 15g-1, 15g-2, 15g-3,
15g-4,  15g-5,  15g-6,  and  15g-7 under the Exchange Act. The rules may further
affect the ability of owners of the Company's shares to sell their securities in
any  market  that  may  develop  for  them.  Shareholders  should be aware that,
according  to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered
in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:

     -    control  of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers
          that  are  often  related  to  the  promoter  or  issuer;
     -    manipulation  of  prices through prearranged matching of purchases and
          sales  and  false  and  misleading  press  releases;
     -    "boiler  room"  practices  involving  high  pressure sales tactics and
          unrealistic  price  projections  by  inexperienced  sales  persons;
     -    excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling
          broker-dealers;  and
     -    the  wholesale  dumping  of  the  same  securities  by  promoters  and
          broker-dealers  after prices have been manipulated to a desired level,
          along  with  the  inevitable  collapse of those prices with consequent
          investor  losses.

     THE  ISSUANCE  OF  ADDITIONAL  SHARES  MAY  HAVE THE EFFECT OF DILUTING THE
     INTEREST  OF  SHAREHOLDERS.

Any  additional issuances of common stock by the Company from its authorized but
unissued  shares  may  have  the  effect  of diluting the percentage interest of
existing  shareholders.  Out  of  the  Company's  500,000,000  authorized common
shares, 486,844,440 or approximately 97.4% remain unissued at December 16, 2003.
The  Board  of  Directors has the power to issue such shares without shareholder
approval.  None of the 40,000,000 authorized preferred shares of the Company are
issued. The Company fully intends to issue additional common shares or preferred
shares  in  order  to  raise  capital to fund its business operations and growth
objectives  or  as  compensation for services rendered on behalf of the Company.

BOARD  OF  DIRECTORS' AUTHORITY TO SET RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF PREFERRED STOCK
MAY PREVENT A CHANGE IN CONTROL BY STOCKHOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK.

Preferred  shares  may  be  issued  in  series  from  time  to  time  with  such
designation,  rights,  preferences  and  limitations  as  the Company's Board of
Directors  determines by resolution and without shareholder approval. This is an
anti-takeover  measure. The Board of Directors has exclusive discretion to issue
preferred  stock  with rights that may trump those of common stock. The Board of
Directors  could  use  an  issuance  of  Preferred Stock with dilutive or voting
preferences  to  delay,  defer  or prevent common stockholders from initiating a
change  in control of the Company or reduce the rights of common stockholders to
the  net  assets upon dissolution. Preferred stock issuances may also discourage
takeover  attempts  that  may  offer premiums to holders of the Company's common
stock.


<PAGE>
STOCKHOLDERS  DO  NOT  HAVE  THE  AUTHORITY  TO  CALL  A SPECIAL MEETING THEREBY
DISCOURAGING  TAKEOVER  ATTEMPS.

Pursuant to the Company's articles of incorporation, only the Company's Board of
Directors  has  the power to call a special meeting of the stockholders, thereby
limiting  the  ability  of  stockholders  to  effect  a change in control of the
Company.

THE  COMPANY DOES NOT ANTICIPATE PAYING DIVIDENDS TO ITS SECURITY HOLDERS IN THE
FORESEEABLE  FUTURE  WHICH  MAKES  INVESTMENT IN ITS STOCK SPECULATIVE OR RISKY.

The  Company  has not paid dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate
paying  dividends  on  its  common stock in the foreseeable future. The Board of
Directors  has  sole  authority  to  declare  dividends payable to the Company's
shareholders.  The  fact  that  the  Company  has  not  and does not plan to pay
dividends  indicates  that  the  Company  must use all of its funds generated by
operations for reinvestment in its operating activities and also emphasizes that
the Company may not continue as a going concern. Investors also must evaluate an
investment  in  the  Company  solely  on the basis of anticipated capital gains.

LIMITED  LIABILITY  OF  THE  COMPANY'S  EXECUTIVE  OFFICERS  AND  DIRECTORS  MAY
DISCOURAGE  STOCKHOLDERS  FROM  BRINGING  A  LAWSUIT  AGAINST  THEM.

The Company's articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that limit
the  liability of directors for monetary damages and provide for indemnification
of  officers  and  directors.  These provisions may discourage stockholders from
bringing a lawsuit against officers and directors for breaches of fiduciary duty
and may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against officers and
directors even though such action, if successful, might otherwise have benefited
the  stockholders. In addition, a stockholder's investment in the Company may be
adversely  affected  to  the  extent  that costs of settlement and damage awards
against  officers  or  directors  are  paid  by  the  Company  pursuant  to  the
indemnification  provisions  of  the  articles of incorporation and by-laws. The
impact on a stockholder's investment in terms of the cost of defending a lawsuit
may  deter  the  stockholder  from  bringing  suit  against one of the Company's
officers  or  directors.  The  Company  has  been advised that the SEC takes the
position that this provision does not affect the liability of any director under
applicable  federal  and  state  securities  laws.



ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS


The following audited financial statements of the Company are included with this
Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB:

Independent  Auditor's  Report  of  Weinberg  &  Company . . . . . . . . . . F-1

Independent  Auditor's  Report  of  Hawkins  Accounting . . . . . . . . . . .F-2

Consolidated  Balance  Sheets  as  at  September  30,  2003  and  2002 . . . F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations and other Comprehensive Income for the
years  ended  September  30,  2003  and  2002  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the years ended September 30,
2003  and  2002  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-5

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow for the years ended September 30, 2003 and
2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-6

Notes  to  Financial  Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-7


<PAGE>
To  the  Board  of  Directors
EAPI  Entertainment,  Inc.
Langley,  British  Columbia

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                          ----------------------------

We  have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet EAPI Entertainment,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"), as of September 30, 2003, and the related
consolidated  statements  of  operations  and  comprehensive  income  (loss),
stockholders'  deficiency  and  cash  flows  for  the  year  then  ended.  These
financial  statements  are  the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility  is  to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our  audit.

We  conducted  our  audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting  Oversight  Board of the United States.  Those standards require that
we  plan  and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial  statements  are  free  of  material  misstatement.  An audit includes
examining,  on  a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the  financial  statements.  An  audit  also  includes  assessing the accounting
principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as well as
evaluating  the  overall  financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audit  provides  a  reasonable  basis  for  our  opinion.

In  our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly  in  all  material  respects, the consolidated financial position of EAPI
Entertainment,  Inc.  and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2003, and the results
of  their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity
with  accounting  principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The  accompanying  consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that  the  Company  will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 11 to
the  consolidated financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $1,329,862
and  a  negative  cash  flows  from  operations  of  $401,095 for the year ended
September  30,  2003,  and  has a working capital deficiency of $3,602,886 and a
shareholders'  deficiency  of  $3,620,941  as  of  September 30, 2003 that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's
plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 11. The consolidated
financial  statements  do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome  of  this  uncertainty.



WEINBERG & COMPANY, P.A.

Boca Raton, Florida
February 27, 2004


                                      F-1
<PAGE>
To the Board of Directors
EAPI Entertainment, Inc.
Langley, British, Columbia

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

I  have  audited  the  consolidated  balance  sheet  of EAPI Entertainment, Inc.
(Formerly  - Duro Enzyme Products Inc.) as of September 30, 2002 and the related
consolidated  statements  of operations, stockholders' deficiency and cash flows
for  the  year  ended  September  30,  2002.  These financial statements are the
responsibility  of  the Company's management. My responsibility is to express an
opinion  on  these  financial  statements  based  on  my  audit.

I conducted my audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
the  United  States of America.  Those standards require that I plan and perform
the  audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are  free  of  material  misstatement.  An  audit  includes examining, on a test
basis,  evidence  supporting  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as well as evaluating the overall
financial  statement  presentation.  I believe that my audit provides reasonable
basis  for  my  opinion.

In  my  opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly,  in  all  material respects, the consolidated financial position of EAPI
Entertainment,  Inc.  (Formerly - Duro Enzyme Products Inc.) as of September 30,
2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then
ended  in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States  of  America.

The  accompanying  financial  statements have been prepared assuming the Company
will  continue  as  a  going  concern.  As discussed in Note 11 to the financial
statements,  the  Company  has  incurred net losses since inception, which raise
substantial  doubt  about  its  ability  to  continue  as  a going concern.  The
financial  statements  do  not include any adjustment that might result from the
outcome  of  this  uncertainty.


/s/  "Hawkins Accounting"

DECEMBER 23, 2002


                                      F-2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    EAPI ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  (FORMERLY DURO ENZYME PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED)
                          CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                          September 30, 2003 and 2002

ASSETS

                                                                     2003          2002
                                                                 ------------  ------------
<S>                                                              <C>           <C>
Current assets
  Cash in bank                                                   $    38,995   $         -
  Non-trade receivable                                               185,443       102,163
  Prepaid                                                             44,988             -
                                                                 ------------  ------------
    Total current assets                                             269,426       102,163
Other assets

  Licenses (net)                                                           -     2,000,000
                                                                 ------------  ------------
    Total other assets                                                     -     2,000,000
                                                                 ------------  ------------
TOTAL ASSETS                                                     $   269,426   $ 2,102,163
                                                                 ============  ============

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
Current liabilities
  Cash Overdraft                                                 $         -   $     1,262
  Accounts payable and fees                                          454,231       219,960
  Payable and fees to related parties                              2,104,779     1,381,299
  Short term notes to related parties                              1,313,302       447,249
                                                                 ------------  ------------
    Total current liabilities                                      3,872,312     2,049,770

Deferred Rent                                                         18,055             -
Net Liabilities of Discontinued Operations                                 -        12,777
Long term debt                                                             -     2,752,738
                                                                 ------------  ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES                                                  3,890,367     4,815,285

Shareholders' deficiency
  Preferred stock, 40,000,000 shares authorized $.001
    par value, 0 shares outstanding                                        -             -
  Common stock, 500,000,000 authorized, $.001 par
  value, 13,155,560 outstanding in 2003 and 14,355,560 in 2002        13,156        14,356
  Paid in capital                                                  5,293,014     4,445,070
  Deficit                                                         (8,502,410)   (7,172,548)
  Accumulated other Comprehensive Loss                              (424,701)            -
                                                                 ------------  ------------
    Total shareholders' deficiency                                (3,620,941)   (2,713,122)
                                                                 ------------  ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY                   $   269,426   $ 2,102,163
                                                                 ============  ============
</TABLE>

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
                                   statements


                                      F-3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                           EAPI ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        (FORMERLY DURO ENZYME PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED)
                          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
                               OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
                       For the years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002


                                                    2003                   2002
                                            --------------------  ----------------------
<S>                                         <C>                   <C>
Revenue                                                       -                       -
                                            --------------------  ----------------------

Expenses
  Consulting and professional fees                      673,455                 488,258
  Office and administration                              42,542                 220,032
  Investor communication                                  4,754                   3,232
  Travel, meals and entertainment                         2,095                       0
  Rent, utilities and telephone                         145,814                 113,050
                                            --------------------  ----------------------
    Total expenses                                      868,660                 824,572
                                            --------------------  ----------------------

  Loss from operations                                 (868,660)               (824,572)

Other expenses
  Loss on asset impairment                                    -              (3,083,000)
  Interest                                             (121,722)               (137,094)
                                            --------------------  ----------------------
    Total other expenses                               (121,722)             (3,220,094)
                                            --------------------  ----------------------

  Loss before discontinued operations                  (990,382)             (4,044,666)
    Loss on discontinued operations                    (339,480)             (1,117,185)
                                            --------------------  ----------------------
Net Loss                                    $        (1,329,862)  $          (5,161,851)
                                            ====================  ======================

Loss per share of common stock
  From continuing operations                $             (0.08)  $               (0.31)
  From discontinued operations                            (0.02)                  (0.08)
                                            --------------------  ----------------------
Net loss per share of common stock          $             (0.10)  $               (0.39)

Weighted average of
  shares outstanding                                 13,155,560              13,155,560
                                            ====================  ======================


Comprehensive Income (Loss)

  Foreign currency translation adjustment              (424,701)                      -
                                            --------------------  ----------------------

  Other comprehensive income (loss)                    (424,701)                      -
  Net loss                                           (1,329,862)             (5,161,851)
                                            --------------------  ----------------------

Comprehensive Income (Loss)                 $        (1,754,563)  $          (5,161,851)
                                            ====================  ======================
</TABLE>

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
                                   statements


                                      F-4
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             EAPI ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           (FORMERLY DURO ENZYME PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED)
                          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
                          For the years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002

                                               Common stock
                                         -------------------------                                   Other
                                                                     Paid in                     Comprehensive
                                           Shares        Amount      Capital      Deficit         Income (Loss)          Total
                                         -----------  ------------  ----------  ------------  ----------------------  ------------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>           <C>                     <C>
Balance
   October 1, 2001                       13,150,560   $    13,151   $1,361,849  $(2,010,697)                          $  (635,697)
Issuance of stock                             5,000             5        1,420                                              1,425
Purchase of Business -
   Shares to be Issued                    1,200,000         1,200    3,081,801                                          3,083,001
Net loss for the year
   ended September 30, 2002                                                      (5,161,851)                           (5,161,851)
Balance
                                         -----------  ------------  ----------  ------------                          ------------
    September 30, 2002                   14,355,560        14,356    4,445,070   (7,172,548)                      -    (2,713,122)

Disposal of Business                     (1,200,000)       (1,200)       1,200                                                  -
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment                                                                    (424,701)     (424,701)
Gain on cancellation of debt from                                      846,744                                            846,744
Related Party
Net loss for the year
   ended September 30, 2003                                                      (1,329,862)                           (1,329,862)
                                         -----------  ------------  ----------  ------------  ----------------------  ------------
                                         13,155,560   $    13,156   $5,293,014  $(8,502,410)               (424,701)  $(3,620,941)
                                         ===========  ============  ==========  ============  ======================  ============
</TABLE>

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
                                   statements


                                      F-5
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                EAPI ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              (FORMERLY DURO ENZYME PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED)
                          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS-INDIRECT METHOD
                             For the years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002


                                                               2003               2002
                                                          ---------------  -----------------
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss                                                  $   (1,329,862)  $     (5,161,851)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
  Used in operating activities
  Depreciation and amortization                                   62,500            250,000
  Recovery on accrued Interest                                    31,506                  -
  Deferred rent                                                   18,055                  -
  Increase in accounts payable                                   957,751          1,447,877
  Increase in accounts receivable                                (83,280)          (102,093)
  Increase in Prepaid Accounts                                   (44,988)                 -
  Loss on impairment of assets                                         -          3,083,000
  Net Liabilities of Discontinued Operations                     (12,777)            12,777
                                                          ---------------  -----------------


NET CASH USED IN OPERATING
  ACTIVITIES                                                    (401,095)          (470,290)
                                                          ---------------  -----------------

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
  (Decrease) Increase in bank overdraft                           (1,262)             1,262
  Sale of common stock                                                 -              1,425
  Long term debt                                                       -            124,998
  Short term notes                                               866,053            339,416
                                                          ---------------  -----------------

NET CASH GENERATED FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES                     864,791            467,101

EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION                          (424,701)                 -
                                                          ---------------  -----------------

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
  EQUIVALENTS                                                     38,995             (3,189)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period               -              3,189
                                                          ---------------  -----------------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF
  THE PERIOD                                              $        38,995   $             -
                                                          ================  ================
</TABLE>

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
                                   statements


                                      F-6
<PAGE>
                            EAPI ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                 (FORMERLY - DURO ENZYME PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED)
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                           SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2002

NOTE  1:     SIGNIFICANT  ACCOUNTING  POLICIES
             ---------------------------------

Nature  of  business
--------------------
     EAPI Entertainment, Inc. (The "Company") was incorporated under the laws of
     the  State  of Nevada on September 15, 1995. The Company's current business
     activities,  which  began in the second quarter of 2003, include developing
     business for the electronic entertainment market. The Company is seeking to
     acquire  revenue generating businesses or projects with long term potential
     that  will  enable  the  Company  to  generate revenues to fund the current
     business  plan  in  the  electronic  entertainment  market.

Name  change
------------
     On  May  9,  2003  the  Company  filed  to  have  its  name changed to EAPI
     Entertainment,  Inc.  and  on May 27, 2003 the name change was approved and
     effective.

Principles  of  Consolidation
-----------------------------
     The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  EAPI
     Entertainment,  Inc.,  and its three wholly owned subsidiaries one of which
     owns  five  subsidiaries:
     EAPI  Center  Inc.
     Duro  Enzyme  Solutions, Inc. - Nevada, USA (Name to be changed) Electronic
     Systems  Alliance  Inc.  (To  be  changed from Duro Enzyme Solutions, Inc.)

     EASI  Studios  Inc.
     SuperNet  Computing  Inc.
     EASI  Games  Inc.
     EASI  Education  Inc.
     EASI  Movies,  Music  Television  and  Video  Inc.

     All  material  inter-company  transactions  have  been  eliminated.

Use  of  estimates
------------------
     The  preparation  of  the financial statements in conformity with generally
     accepted  accounting  principles of the United States require management to
     make  estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
     liabilities  and  disclosures  of contingent liabilities at the date of the
     financial  statements  and  the  reported  amounts of revenues and expenses
     during  the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from
     these  estimates.


                                      F-7
<PAGE>
Cash  equivalents
-----------------
     For  the  purpose of the statement of cash flows, the company considers all
     highly  liquid  debt  instruments  purchased  with the original maturity of
     three  months  or  less  to  be  cash  equivalents.

Property  and  equipment
------------------------
     Property  and  equipment  are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are
     expensed  as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. When
     items  of  property or equipment are sold or retired, the related costs and
     accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts a d any gain or loss
     is included in income. Depreciation is provided using the straight line and
     accelerated  methods  over  the  useful  lives.

Intangible  and  other  assets
------------------------------
     The cost to purchase intangible assets is recorded at the purchase price of
     the  contract  and  amortized  over  its useful life not to exceed 10 years
     using  the  straight-line  method.  Amortization  cost for the year 2003 is
     $62,500, and 2002 $250,000. No Amortization was taken in the period January
     1  -  September  30,  2003  due to the recovery on the license termination.

Income  Taxes
-------------
     Income  taxes  are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in
     the  financial  statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred
     taxes  related primarily to differences between the recorded book basis and
     tax basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting.
     The  deferred  tax  assets  and liabilities represent the future tax return
     consequences  of  those  differences,  which  will  either  be  taxable  or
     deductible  when  the  assets  and  liabilities  are  recovered  or settle.
     Deferred  taxes are also recognized for operating losses that are available
     to  offset  future  taxable  income  and  tax credits that are available to
     offset  future  federal  income  taxes.

Comprehensive  Income
---------------------
     Generally  accepted  accounting  principles  require  the  inclusion of the
     statement  of  Comprehensive Income for certain transactions including gain
     or  loss  on  foreign  currency transactions and unrealized gain or loss on
     marketable  securities.

Foreign  Currency
-----------------
     The  functional  currency  of  the Company is US$. A significant subsidiary
     conducts its business in a foreign currency (CDN$) and appropriate exchange
     translation adjustments are made during the period and at the period end to
     report  the  results  in  US$.

Recent  Accounting  Pronouncements
----------------------------------

     The following accounting pronouncements if implemented would have no effect
     on  the  financial  statements  of  the  Company.


                                      F-8
<PAGE>
     In  January  2003,  (as  revised in December 2003) The Financial Accounting
     Standards  Board  ("FASB")  issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of
     Variable  Interest  Entities",  an  interpretation  of  Accounting Research
     Bulletin  ("ARB")  No.  51.  "Consolidated  Financial  Statements".
     Interpretation  No.  46  addresses consolidation by business enterprises of
     variable  interest  entities,  which  have  one  or  both  of the following
     characteristics:  (i)  the  equity  investment at risk is not sufficient to
     permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated
     support  from  other parties, which is provided through other interest that
     will  absorb  some  or  all  of the expected losses of the entity; (ii) the
     entity  the  investors  lack  one  or  more  of  the  following  essential
     characteristics of a controlling financial interest: the direct or indirect
     ability  to  make  decisions  about  the entities activities through voting
     rights  or  similar rights; or the obligation to absorb the expected losses
     of the entity if they occur, which makes it possible for the entity if they
     occur,  which  is  the  compensation for the risk of absorbing the expected
     losses.

     Interpretation  No.  46,  as revised, also requires expanded disclosures by
     the  primary  beneficiary (as defined) of a variable interest entity and by
     an  enterprise  that  holds  a  significant variable interest in a variable
     interest  entity  but  is  not  the  primary  beneficiary.

     Interpretation  No.  46,  as  revised, applies to small business issuers no
     later  than  the end of the first reporting period that ends after December
     15,  2004.  The  effective  date  includes  those  entities  to  which
     Interpretation  46 had previously had previously applied. However, prior to
     the  required  application  of Interpretation 46, a public entity that is a
     small  business issuer shall apply Interpretation 46 or this Interpretation
     to  those  entities  that  are considered to be special-purpose entities no
     later  than  as  of  the  end of the first reporting period that ends after
     December  15,  2003.

     Interpretation No. 46 may be applied prospectively with a cumulative-effect
     adjustment  as  of  the  date  which  it  is  first applied or by restating
     previously  issued  financial  of  the  first  year  restated.

     In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
     Compensation  -  Transition  and  Disclosure". SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No.
     123,  "Accounting  for  Stock-Based  Compensation",  to provide alternative
     methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method
     of  accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No.
     148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent
     disclosures  in  both  annual  and  interim  financial statements about the
     method  of  accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect
     of  the  method  used  on  reported  results. SFAS No. 148 is effective for
     fiscal  years  beginning  after  December  15, 2002. The interim disclosure
     provisions  are  effective  for  financial  reports  containing  financial
     statements  for  interim  periods  beginning  after  December 15, 2002. The
     adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not have a significant effect on the Company's
     financial  statement  presentation  or  disclosures.


                                      F-9
<PAGE>
     In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
     Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities". SFAS No. 149 amends and
     clarifies  financial  accounting  and reporting for derivative instruments,
     including  certain  derivative  instruments  embedded  in  other  contracts
     (collectively  referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under
     SFAS  No.  133,  "Accounting  for  Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging
     Activities".  The  changes  in  SFAS No. 149 improve financial reporting by
     requiring  that  contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for
     similarly.  This  statement  is  effective  for  contracts  entered into or
     modified  after  June  30, 2003 and all of its provisions should be applied
     prospectively.

     In  May  2003,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards Board ("FASB") issued
     Statement  of  Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 150, "Accounting
     For  Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities
     and  Equity".  SFAS  No.  150  changes the accounting for certain financial
     instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity that, under
     previous  pronouncements,  issuers  could  account  for  as equity. The new
     accounting  guidance  contained  in  SFAS  No.  150  requires  that  those
     instruments  be  classified  as  liabilities  in  the  balance  sheet.

     SFAS  No.  150  affects  the  issuer's  accounting  for  three  types  of
     freestanding  financial  instruments.  One  type  is mandatorily redeemable
     shares,  which the issuing company is obligated to buy back in exchange for
     cash  or  other  assets.  A  second  type  includes put options and forward
     purchase  contracts,  which involves instruments that do or may require the
     issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets.
     The  third type of instruments that are liabilities under this Statement is
     obligations that can be settled with shares, the monetary value of which is
     fixed,  tied  solely or predominantly to a variable such as a market index,
     or  varies  inversely  with  the value of the issuers' shares. SFAS No. 150
     does not apply to features embedded in a financial instrument that is not a
     derivative  in  its  entirety.

     Most  of  the  provisions of Statement 150 are consistent with the existing
     definition  of  liabilities  in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, "Elements of
     Financial  Statements".  The  remaining  provisions  of  this Statement are
     consistent  with the FASB's proposal to revise that definition to encompass
     certain  obligations  that a reporting entity can or must settle by issuing
     its own shares. This Statement shall be effective for financial instruments
     entered  into  or  modified  after  May  31,  2003  and  otherwise shall be
     effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June
     15,  2003,  except  for  mandatorily  redeemable financial instruments of a
     non-public  entity,  as  to  which the effective date is for fiscal periods
     beginning  after  December  15,  2004.


                                      F-10
<PAGE>
Reclassification
----------------

Certain  account reclassifications have been made to the financial statements of
the  prior year in order to conform to classifications used in the current year.
These  changes  had  no  impact on previously stated financial statements of the
Company.


NOTE  2:     LOSS/  GAIN  ON  DISPOSAL  OF  ASSETS
             -------------------------------------

     On December 23, 2002 the Board of Directors agreed to dispose of Bruden and
     on January 6, 2003 an agreement was signed with the former owner to dispose
     of the business. The results of Bruden Steaming and Vac Truck Services Ltd.
     during  the period are included as discontinued operations in the financial
     statements.  (See  Note  10.)

     In  September  2000,  the  Company,  through  its  subsidiary  Duro  Enzyme
     Solutions,  Inc.  Nevada,  USA,  entered  into  a  License and Distribution
     Agreement  with a related party (See Note 3) to use exclusive stable enzyme
     production  technology,  both  current and further developed by the Company
     from  its own research for the term of the agreement. The purchase price of
     this  license was $2,500,000 and was satisfied by a promissory note bearing
     interest at a rate of 5% per annum which did not commence until the Company
     begins  selling  stable  enzymes. The $2,500,000 was being amortized over a
     10-year  period  using  the  straight-line  method.

     On  May  5,  2003 the Company agreed to terminate the License agreement and
     all  liabilities  associated  with the license were eliminated. The license
     was  with  a related party so the debt forgiveness in excess of the license
     book  value  on  the License termination has been recorded in the financial
     statements  as  an  additional  paid  in  capital  (See  Note10).

NOTE  3:     RELATED  PARTY  TRANSACTION
             ---------------------------

     A  total of $376,616 was accrued in consultant services for the year ending
     September  30, 2003, $183,685 September 30, 2002. The total outstanding and
     unpaid  is  $762,215 at September 30, 2003, $385,599 at September 30, 2002.
     Thirteen  (13)  companies, which are owned or controlled by shareholders or
     creditors  of  the  Company,  have  provided  services and expertise to the
     Company  during  this  period.

     During  the period to September 30, 2002, the Company endorsed Research and
     Development  Service  Agreements  with a company owned by a creditor of the
     Company.  The  agreement  was  canceled  in  December, 2002. This agreement
     retained  the  Founder's  company's  expertise  and  services for research,
     development,  design,  and  related  consultations.  A  consulting  fee was
     charged  at  a standard rate, established by the consultants. An additional


                                      F-11
<PAGE>
     15%  was  charged  on  incurred  costs  as  an administrative, overhead and
     handling  charge. The long-term debt owed has been canceled but was owed to
     the creditor, however the amount is now $NIL, September 30, 2002 the amount
     was  $2,752,738(See  notes7  and10).

     One year short-term loans of $866,053 were advanced to the Company by three
     shareholders  during  the year ending September 30, 2003. The interest rate
     for the loans is 10%. $339,416 was advanced during the year ended September
     30,  2002.  The  funds  were  used  for  operating  capital.

     The  Company had two 5-year leases for facilities.  Both were terminated by
     mutual  agreement  in  December  2002.  One  lease  is for office space and
     furnishings.  This lease has accrued rent at the end of September 30, 2003,
     of  $223,653  and  $176,612  at  September  30,  2002.

     The  other  lease was for Research space. It has accrued rent at the end of
     September  30,  2003,  of $163,118 and $120,168 at September 30, 2002. Both
     leases  were  held  by shareholders of the Company, which own the premises.

     The Company has accrued fees of $742,664 to September 30, 2003 and $572,228
     to  September  30, 2002 for a 36-month Technology, Operations, Maintenance,
     Research & Development, Engineering and Training consulting contract with a
     company  owned by shareholders. The contract was entered into on January 1,
     2002.  On  December  13,  2002  the  contract was canceled and both parties
     agreed to repay the outstanding fees from revenue generated by the Company.

     The  Company  has  accrued  fees  of  $126,692 to September 30, 2003, for a
     4-month  Office,  Accounting & Administration contract with a company owned
     by  shareholders who own less than 5% of DEPI authorized and issued shares.
     The  Company  entered into the contract for the period of time necessary to
     prepare its in-house office, accounting, and administrative department. The
     duration  of  the  contact  was from January 1, 2002, to April 30, 2002. On
     December  23,  2003  both parties agreed to repay the outstanding fees from
     revenue  generated  by  the  Company.


NOTE  4:     INCOME  TAXES
             -------------

     The  long  term  deferred  tax  benefit  for  income taxes from the loss of
     operations  from the current year consists of the following component: long
     term  deferred tax benefit of $452,153 for the fiscal year ending September
     30,  2003  and  an accumulated long term tax benefit of $2,890,819 from all
     net  operating  losses.  The  Company  provides  a  $2,890,819  a valuation
     allowance  recorded  against  the  deferred  tax  asset  resulting from net
     operating  losses.  The  effective  tax rate used in the computation of the
     deferred  tax  benefit is 34%. Net operating loss carry-forward will expire
     in  various  years  beginning  in  2013.


                                      F-12
<PAGE>
     The  valuation  allowance  will  be  evaluated  at  the  end  of each year,
     considering  positive and negative evidence about whether the asset will be
     realized.  At  the time, the allowance will either be increased or reduced;
     reduction  would  result  in  the  complete elimination of the allowance if
     positive  evidence  indicates  that the valuation allownace of the deferred
     tax  asset  is  no  longer  required.

     No  provision  is  being  made  for  state  income  tax for the year ending
     September  30,  2003 since all operations are in Canada. In prior years the
     operations  were  in  California  and  California  Franchise  taxes  were
     applicable.


NOTE  5:     COMMON  STOCK
             -------------

     On January 31, 2002 the board of directors voted a 20:1 forward stock split
     as  of  the  record  date  March  4,  2002.

     On  April 18, 2002 the board approved the issuance of 5,000 shares to James
     C.  Florio,  for  his  ongoing  assistance  to  the  board  of  Directors.

     On  May  29,  2002 the Company acquired a new business, Bruden Steaming and
     Vac  Truck  Services  Ltd.  "(Bruden"). In exchange for all the outstanding
     shares  of  Bruden  the Company issued 1,200,000 common shares. On December
     23,  2002 the board of Directors agreed to dispose of Bruden. On January 6,
     2003  in  exchange  for  the  return  of the 1,200,000 common shares of the
     Company  the  Company  disposed  of  Bruden  to  the  former  owner.

     On May 9, 2003 the Company filed to have a share rollback of 50 to 1 and an
     amendment to the articles of incorporation to decrease the authorized share
     capital  to  500,000,000  common shares. This 50 to 1 rollback was approved
     and  on  May  27,  2003  it  was  effective.

     All  share  and  per share amounts have been restated to give effect to the
     forward  and  reverse  stock  splits  that  took  place  in  2003 and 2002,
     respectively.

NOTE  6:     FIXED  ASSETS
             -------------

     The  Company's  only  fixed assets were part of the Company Bruden Steaming
     and  Vac  Truck Services Ltd. and as a result of the disposition on January
     6, 2003 discussed in Note 2 the assets have been transferred back to Bruden
     and  the  company  has  no  further  fixed  assets,  only rented equipment.

     For  the  year  ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 depreciation was $Nil and
     $79,321  respectively.


                                      F-13
<PAGE>
NOTE  7:     NOTES  PAYABLE
             --------------

     The  note payable in the amount of $2,500,000 had annual interest of 5% per
     annum  and  was  tied  to  purchase  of the license agreement (see Note 2).
     Payment terms were tied to the commencing of sales by the Company. Interest
     accrued  until  such  time  as six months from first date of sales. At such
     time,  principal  plus  accrued  interest was to be repaid over five years.

     On  May  5,  2003  the  Note  Payable  was  canceled as part of the license
     termination  agreement.  The  accrued  interest payable was not paid and is
     included  in  recovery  on  license termination in the financial statements
     (See  Note  10).

     Short-term  borrowings  were from related parties and are discussed in Note
     3.


NOTE  8:     EARNINGS  PER  SHARE
             --------------------

     Basic  earnings  per  share  are computed by dividing earnings available to
     common  stockholders  by  the  weighted  average  number  of  common shares
     outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect per share
     amounts  that  would have resulted if resulted if dilutive potential common
     stock  had been converted to common stock. The following reconciles amounts
     reported  in  the  financial  statements.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              For the Year Ended 2002
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                        Income        Shares       Per-Share
                                     (Numerator)   (Denominator)    Amount
                                     ------------  -------------  -----------
<S>                                  <C>           <C>            <C>
(Loss) from continuing operations
before discontinued operations and
Extraordinary license recovery
available to common stockholders
earnings (loss) per share            $(4,044,666)     13,155,560  $    (0.31)
                                     ============  =============  ===========
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            For the Year Ended 2002 (Con't)
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           Income        Shares       Per-Share
                                        (Numerator)   (Denominator)    Amount
                                        ------------  -------------  -----------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>            <C>
(Loss) from discontinued operations
available to common stockholders
earnings (loss) per share               $(1,117,185)     13,155,560  $    (0.08)
                                        ============  =============  ===========


                                      F-14
<PAGE>
Net (Loss) from continuing operations
available to common stockholders
basic earnings (loss) per share         $(5,161,851)     13,155,560  $    (0.39)
                                        ============  =============  ===========
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               For the Year Ended 2003
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                         Income        Shares       Per-Share
                                      (Numerator)   (Denominator)    Amount
                                      ------------  -------------  -----------
<S>                                   <C>           <C>            <C>
(Loss) from continuing operations
before discontinued operations and
Extraordinary license recovery
available to common stockholders
earnings (loss) per share            $  (990,382)     13,155,560  $    (0.08)
                                      ============  =============  ===========

(Loss) from discontinued operations
available to common stockholders
earnings (loss) per share             $  (339,480)     13,155,560  $    (0.02)
                                      ============  =============  ===========

Net (Loss)
available to common stockholders
basic earnings per share              $(1,329,862)     13,155,560  $    (0.10)
                                      ============  =============  ===========
</TABLE>


NOTE  9:     LEASES
             ------

     The  Company had two five-year leases, one for office space and furnishings
     and  the  other  for  research facilities. Both were terminated in December
     2002  by  mutual  agreement.

     The  main  office  building  was taken over by a new owner and all research
     activities  ceased in December 2002. A total of $68,812 was charged to rent
     expense  under  these  leases  during  the period ending December 31, 2002.
     These  leases  were  recorded as operating leases and the amounts paid were
     charged  to  expense.  The  Company has negotiated a new lease with the new
     owner  for  a three-year term for the main office space. The rental expense
     charged  in  the  period  to September 30, 2003 on the new lease is $74,659
     resulting  in a total rent expense for the year of $143,471. The Company is
     committed  under its lease to January 31, 2006. Future minimum annual lease
     payments  are  due  as  follows:

                          Year                    Amount
                          ----                    ------
                          2004                    $66,400
                          2005                    $66,400
                          2006                    $55,333
                                                ---------
                          Total                  $188,133
                                                 ========


                                      F-15
<PAGE>
NOTE  10:     ACQUISITION  AND  DISPOSITION
              -----------------------------

     On  May  29,  2002  the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of a
     private company, Bruden Steaming and Vac Truck Services Ltd. ("Bruden"). On
     January  6,  2003  all the outstanding shares of Bruden were disposed of in
     exchange  for  the  return  of  1,200,000 common shares of the Company. The
     results  of  Bruden's  operations  in  the  period  and  the  gain  on  the
     disposition  have been included in the consolidated financial statements as
     discontinued  operations. The total loss during the period to September 30,
     2002  was  $12,777.  On  September  27,  2002 the Board of Directors of the
     Corporation  agreed  to review the purchase and the Financial Statements of
     Bruden.  Management  determined that the entire amount of Goodwill obtained
     in  the  purchase  of  Bruden  should be fully impaired. In accordance with
     Financial  Accounting  Statement  number  144,  the  goodwill  needs  to be
     impaired  prior  to  any  computation  of a gain or loss on the disposal of
     Bruden.

     The  value  of the 1,200,000 common shares issued by the Company to acquire
     Bruden  was  determined  based on the average market price of Duro's common
     shares  over  a  2-day period before and after the date of the acquisition.

     On  December 23, 2002 Management agreed to dispose of Bruden and on January
     6,  2003  and  agreement  was  signed  (Note  2).

     On May 5, 2003 the Company agreed to terminate its License and distribution
     agreement discussed in Note 2. In December 2002 all research ceased and the
     Company  was  assessing if it should continue with the technology licensed.
     The  Company concluded that they no longer wished to pursue this technology
     and  entered  into negotiation to terminate the License. This was concluded
     with  an  agreement  on  May  5,  2003.

     The  results of the operations of the Enzyme license business in the period
     and  the  loss  on  the  disposition have been included in the consolidated
     financial  statements as discontinued operations. In the current period the
     total  loss  to  May  5,  2003  is  $352,257  and to September 30, 2002 the
     operation loss is $1,104,408. The termination of License resulted in a gain
     on  cancellation of debt from a related party of $846,744. This is included
     in  paid  in  capital  on  the financial statements since the debt was to a
     related  party  creditor.

     The  income  from  discontinued operations in the amount of $12,777 for the
     period  ended  September 30, 2002 results from the Company's disposition of
     Bruden  on  January  6,  2003.


                                      F-16
<PAGE>
NOTE  11:     GOING  CONCERN
              --------------

     The  accompanying  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been prepared
     assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has
     a  net  loss  of  $1,329,862  and  a negative cash flows from operations of
     $401,095  for  the year ended September 30, 2003, and has a working capital
     deficiency of $3,602,886 and a shareholders' deficiency of $3,620,941 as of
     September  30,  2003  that  raise  substantial  doubt  about its ability to
     continue  as  a  going  concern.

     The  Company  plans  to  acquire new business and raise funds, through debt
     issuance  or  through  the  generation  of revenue and achieving profitable
     operations.  It  will  also  continue  to  pursue  acquisitions  and  joint
     ventures,  to  strengthen  both  its  balance  sheet  and  cash-flow.

     The  Company has been actively pursuing new acquisitions and the Company is
     currently  negotiating  with  several  potential  businesses  that  would
     significantly  change  the operations of the Company. The Company's ability
     to  continue  as  a going concern is dependent upon raising capital through
     debt or equity financing and ultimately by generating revenue and achieving
     profitable  operations.  There  is  no  assurance  that the Company will be
     successful  in  its  efforts  to  raise  additional  proceeds  or  achieve
     profitable  operations.  The  financial  statements  do  not  include  any
     adjustments  that  might  result  from  the  outcome  of  this uncertainty.


NOTE  12:     SIGNIFICANT  EVENTS
              -------------------

     On December 13, 2002 the Company shut down its enzyme research (See Notes 2
     and  10).  Several  of the Company's contracts have been amended due to the
     change  in  the  operation  of  the  business.  These actions were taken as
     management  considers  its  future  use  of  the  enzyme  technology.

     On  May  5, 2003 the Company agreed to terminate its License agreement (See
     Note  2 and 10). The Company concluded that they no longer wanted to pursue
     this technology and entered into negotiation to terminate the License. This
     was  concluded  with  an  agreement  on  May  5,  2003.

     On  May  9,  2003  the  Company  filed  to  have  its name changed to "EAPI
     Entertainment,  Inc."  and have the shareholders approve the name change, a
     share rollback of 50 to 1 and an amendment to the articles of incorporation
     to  decrease  the authorized share capital to 500,000,000 common shares. On
     May 27, 2003 these changes were all effective. This action was taken by the
     board  of  directors  to  more  accurately  reflect  the  Company's current
     business  activities  of  developing  businesses  for  the  electronic
     entertainment  market.  Our  board  of directors believes that the new name
     will  promote public recognition of the Company and more accurately reflect
     the  Company's  products  and  business  focus.


                                      F-17
<PAGE>
     On October 29, 2003 the President of the Company Perry Smith resigned.

     The  New  President of the Company is Peter Gardner. Peter Gardner has over
     20  years  of  experience  in  the  Electronic  Entertainment  Industry.

     On  January  31,  2004 a settlement agreement was reached in a lawsuit that
     the  Company  is  a party to. The settlement is scheduled to close on March
     15,  2004  and  the  Company  will  be  released from all liability in this
     matter.  The  Company  had not expected any liability and therefore had not
     made  any  accrual.

     As  a  result  of  these  events  the  operations  of  the  Company  have
     significantly  changed.


                                      F-18
<PAGE>
ITEM 8.  CHANGES  IN  AND  DISAGREEMENTS  WITH  ACCOUNTANTS  ON  ACCOUNTING  AND
         FINANCIAL  DISCLOSURE

On  December 19, 2003, Hawkins Accounting, ("Hawkins") resigned as the Company's
independent  accountants. Hawkins resigned because it chose not to register with
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the purpose of issuing reports
on  public  companies.  On  December  22,  2003 the Company's board of directors
decided to engage Weinberg & Company, PA to serve as its independent accountants
and  approved  the change of independent accountants.  The reports of Hawkins on
the  Company's  consolidated  financial statements for the past two fiscal years
contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or
modified as to audit scope or accounting principles.

During  the  Company's  two  most  recent  fiscal  years,  the  Company  had  no
disagreements  with Hawkins on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial  statement  disclosure,  or  auditing  scope  or  procedure,  which
disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Hawkins, would have caused
Hawkins  to  make  reference  to  the  subject  matter  of  the  disagreement in
connection with its reports on the Company's financial statements for such years
and interim periods. The Company believes that during its two most recent fiscal
years  Hawkins  's resignation, there were no "reportable events," as defined in
Item  304(a)(1)(v)  of  Regulation  S-K.  The  Company  reported  the  change in
accountants  on  Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"SEC")  on  December  24,  2003.  The  Form 8-K contained a letter from Hawkins,
addressed  to  the  SEC,  stating  that it agreed with the statements concerning
Hawkins  in  such  Form  8-K.

ITEM 8A.  CONTROLS  AND  PROCEDURES

As  required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation
of  the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of  September  30,  2003,  being  the  date of our most recently
completed fiscal quarter.  This evaluation was carried out under the supervision
and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Peter Gardner and
our  Chief  Financial Officer Dean Branconnier.  Based upon that evaluation, our
Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  concluded  that  our
disclosure  controls  and procedures are effective in timely alerting management
to  material  information relating to us required to be included in our periodic
SEC filings.  There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the  date  we  carried  out  our  evaluation.

Disclosure  controls  and  procedures are controls and other procedures that are
designed  to  ensure that information required to be disclosed our reports filed
or  submitted  under  the  Exchange  Act  is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported,  within  the  time  periods  specified  in the Securities and Exchange
Commission's  rules  and  forms.  Disclosure  controls  and  procedures include,
without  limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required  to  be  disclosed  in  our  reports  filed  under  the Exchange Act is
accumulated  and  communicated  to  management,  including  our  Chief Executive
Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  to  allow  timely  decisions regarding
required  disclosure.

During  our  most  recently  completed  fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003,
there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have
materially  affected,  or  are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control
over  financial  reporting.

The  term  "internal  control  over financial reporting" is defined as a process
designed  by,  or under the supervision of, the registrant's principal executive
and  principal  financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and
effected by the registrant's board of directors, management and other personnel,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and  the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with  generally  accepted  accounting principles and includes those policies and
procedures  that:

     (1)  Pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  that  in reasonable detail
          accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
          assets  of  the  registrant;


<PAGE>
     (2)  Provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are  recorded  as
          necessary  to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
          with  generally  accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
          expenditures  of the registrant are being made only in accordance with
          authorizations  of  management  and  directors  of the registrant; and

     (3)  Provide  reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
          of  unauthorized  acquisition,  use or disposition of the registrant's
          assets  that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


<PAGE>
                                    PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE
        WITH  SECTION  16(A)  OF  THE  EXCHANGE  ACT

The  following  information  sets forth the names of our officers and directors,
their  present  positions  with our company, and their biographical information:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME              AGE  POSITION
----------------  ---  --------
<S>               <C>  <C>

Peter Gardner      44  Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Dean Branconnier   36  Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director

Chad Burback       29  Secretary and Director
</TABLE>

PETER  GARDNER  -  PRESIDENT  AND  DIRECTOR
-------------------------------------------

Mr.  Gardner  was appointed as chief executive officer, president and a director
On  November  3,  2003.  Mr.  Gardner  has  over  22  years of experience in the
computer  software  industry  and  is  a  master  in  technical  design.

From  1981  to 1985 Mr. Gardner was involved in software design and development.
In  1985  Mr. Gardner led a design team in the development of a student database
management  and  reporting  software  system.   Mr.  Gardner  created a software
engine  that  generated  reports based on the individual needs of the user.  The
resulting  software  improved  the  school's  reporting  system.

From 1986 to 1988 Mr. Gardner built and operated MindMeld Software ("MindMeld"),
a computer game company based in Vancouver, B.C.  During this time, he developed
software  engines  to  accommodate  the  needs  of  his business and to generate
entertainment  software  programs  for  the  Apple ][, the Commodore 64, and the
early  IBM  Personal  Computer.  In  1988  MindMeld  was acquired by Distinctive
Software,  a  game  development company based in Burnaby, British Columbia.  Mr.
Gardner  retained  ownership  of  his  software  engine technology following the
acquisition.

From  1988 until 1991, Mr. Gardner restructured Distinctive Software and focused
on  developing  its  corporate  strategy.  In  1991,  Distinctive  Software  was
acquired  by  Electronic  Arts Inc., and its name was changed to Electronic Arts
Canada  Inc.  Mr.  Gardner continued to work at Electronic Arts Canada from 1991
to  1994.

From  1994  to  2002 Mr. Gardner assisted various game development companies in:
developing  their  corporate  strategy,  their game development, and negotiating
development  contracts.

In  addition to this, Mr. Gardner created the core design of a major multiplayer
online  game  and  initiated the development of other related engine technology.

MR. DEAN BRANCONNIER - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, TREASURER AND DIRECTOR

Mr.  Branconnier has been the Company's treasurer and a director since September
2000.  Mr.  Branconnier  was appointed as chief financial officer of the Company
on  October  29,  2003.  Since  joining  the  Company,  Mr. Dean Branconnier has
assisted  with  the  organization  and development of the Company.  Prior to the
year 2000, Mr. Branconnier was Plant Manager for Richmond Bio Conversion Inc. in
Richmond,  British  Columbia, Canada (1998-2000) and for Hamilton Bio Conversion
Inc.  in  Hamilton,  Ontario,  Canada  (1995-1998).  As  Plant  Manager,  Mr.
Branconnier  had  the following duties and responsibilities: assist with project
schedules  and construction contracts; plant operations and start up; maintain a
daily  log  of  all plant events and manage daily operations; oversee all office


<PAGE>
administration;  manage  expenditures;  ensure  compliance with permits; conduct
performance  reviews  of  employees; ensure plant safety and security; and staff
the  plants.  Mr.  Branconnier  is  a  first  cousin  of  Mr.  Chad  Burback.

MR. CHAD BURBACK - SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR

Mr.  Burback  has  been  the  Company's secretary and a director since September
2000.  Since  joining  the  Company,  Mr.  Chad  Burback  has  assisted with the
organization  and  development of the Company. Mr. Burback was Plant Manager for
Hamilton  Bio  Conversion  Inc.  in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (1998-2001).  From
1995 to 1998 Mr. Burback was the Plant Manager for Brampton Bio Conversion Inc.,
a  Depackaging  and  Recycling  facility in Brampton, Ontario, Canada.  As Plant
Manager  for each facility, Mr. Burback was responsible for the expansion of the
facilities  and  had  the  following  duties  and  responsibilities: assist with
project schedules and construction contracts; operations control and management;
maintain  a  daily  log  of all plant events; oversee all office administration;
manage expenditures; ensure compliance with permits; conduct performance reviews
of  employees;  ensure  plant  safety  and security; and staff the plants.   Mr.
Burback  is  a  first  cousin  of  Mr.  Dean  Branconnier.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The  Company presently does not have an audit committee, compensation committee,
nominating committee, an executive committee comprised of the Company's board of
directors,  stock plan committee or any other committees. However, the Company's
board  of  directors  will  consider  establishing various committees during the
current  fiscal  year.

TERMS  OF  OFFICE

The  Company's  directors  are appointed for one-year terms to hold office until
the  next annual general meeting of the holders of the Company's common stock or
until  removed  from  office  in  accordance  with  the  Company's  by-laws. The
Company's officers are appointed by its board of directors and hold office until
removed  by  the  Company's  board  of  directors.

AUDIT  COMMITTEE  FINANCIAL  EXPERT

The  Company  presently  has  no financial expert. The Company believes the cost
related  to  retaining  a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. Further,
because  of the Company's start-up operations, the Company believes the services
of  a  financial  expert  are  not  warranted.

CODE  OF  ETHICS

The  Company has not yet adopted a corporate code of ethics. The Company's board
of  directors  is considering, over the next year, establishing a code of ethics
to  deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct; provide full, fair,
accurate,  timely  and  understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with
applicable  laws;  ensure  prompt  internal  reporting  of  code violations; and
provide  accountability  for  adherence  to  the  code.

SECTION  16(a)  BENEFICIAL  OWNERSHIP  REPORTING  COMPLIANCE

The  following  persons  have  failed to file, on a timely basis, the identified
reports  required  by  section  16(a) of the Exchange Act during the most recent
fiscal  year:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS NOT
NAME OF REPORTING PERSON  NUMBER OF LATE REPORTS  REPORTED ON A TIMELY BASIS
------------------------  ----------------------  --------------------------
<S>                       <C>                     <C>
Dean Branconnier          None                    None
------------------------  ----------------------  --------------------------

Chad Burback              None                    None
------------------------  ----------------------  --------------------------
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
ITEM 10.  EXECUTIVE  COMPENSATION

The  following  table  sets  forth  certain  compensation  information as to the
following  individuals  (the  "named  executive  officers"):

(i)    Mr.  Peter  Gardener,  our  chief  executive  officer;
(ii)   Mr.  Dean  Branconnier,  our  chief  financial  officer;
(iii)  Mr.  Perry  Smith,  our  former  chief  executive  officer  who  resigned
       subsequent  to  our  fiscal  year  ended  September  30,  2003.

None  of  our  executive  officers  earned  more  than  $100,000 during our most
recently  completed  fiscal  year.  Accordingly,  we  have  not  included  any
compensation information for any of our executive officers, our than our current
chief  executive  officer,  our  chief  financial  officer  and our former chief
executive  officer.

The  following  table  sets  forth certain information as to the Company's named
executive  officers  for  each  of the Company's fiscal year ended September 30,
2003,  2002 and 2001. No other compensation was paid to any such named executive
officers  other  than  the  compensation  set  forth  below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

                                                          Long Term Compensation
                                                    -----------------------------------
                       Annual Compensation                  Awards            Payouts
------------  ----  ------------------------------  ------------------------  --------  ---------
Name                                       Other    Restricted   Securities
and                                       Annual       Stock      Underlyin     LTIP    All Other
Principal                                 Compens    Award(s)    g Options/   Payouts    Compens
Position      Year  Salary ($)   Bonus   ation ($)      ($)       SARs (#)      ($)     ation ($)
                                  ($)
------------  ----  -----------  ------  ---------  -----------  -----------  --------  ---------
<S>           <C>   <C>          <C>     <C>        <C>          <C>          <C>       <C>
Perry Smith   2003  Nil          N/A     Nil        N/A          N/A          N/A       Nil
(former       2002  $ 30,519(1)  N/A     Nil        N/A          N/A          N/A       Nil
President     2001  Nil          N/A     Nil        N/A          N/A          N/A       Nil
and Chief
Executive
Officer)
------------  ----  -----------  ------  ---------  -----------  -----------  --------  ---------
Dean          2003    14,816(1)  N/A     N/A        N/A          N/A          N/A       Nil
Branconnier   2002  Nil          N/A                N/A          N/A          N/A       Nil
(Treasurer)   2001  Nil          N/A                N/A          N/A          N/A       Nil
------------  ----  -----------  ------  ---------  -----------  -----------  --------  ---------
Peter         2003   48,152 (1)  N/A     N/A        N/A          N/A          N/A       Nil
Gardner
(President
and Chief
Executive
Officer)
------------  ----  -----------  ------  ---------  -----------  -----------  --------  ---------
<FN>

(1)  Represents accrued but unpaid consulting fees to September 30, 2003.
</TABLE>

During  the  year  ended  September  30,  2003,  the  Company hired consultants,
attorneys  and  independent  accountants  to assist management.  The consultants
received  $628,040  in  fees,  the  attorneys  received  $8,776  in  fees,  the
independent  accountants  received  $37,753  in fees and the executives received
$62,968  in  fees.


<PAGE>
COMPENSATION  OF  DIRECTORS

Directors  are not compensated for their service as directors. All directors are
reimbursed  for  any  reasonable  expenses  incurred in the course of fulfilling
their  duties  as  a  director  of  the  Company.

EMPLOYMENT  CONTRACTS

The  Company  pays Mr. Gardener a consulting fee of $10,000 CDN per month (equal
to  approximately  $7,700 per month) in consideration for Mr. Gardener acting as
chief executive officer and president of the Company.  The Company pays Mr. Dean
Branconnier  a  consulting  fee  of $4,000 CDN per month (equal to approximately
$3,080 per month) in consideration for Mr. Branconnier acting as chief financial
officer  and  treasurer of the Company.  The Company is not party to any written
consulting  agreements with either Mr. Gardener, Mr. Branconnier or Mr. Burback.
The  Company  may in the future execute additional written consulting agreements
with  the  consulting companies owned by its executive officers and consultants.


<PAGE>
ITEM 11.   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The  following table sets forth as of January 12, 2004 certain information known
to the Company regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock,
and as adjusted to reflect the share ownership for (i) each executive officer or
director  of  the  Company  who  beneficially owns shares; (ii) each shareholder
known to the Company to beneficially own five percent or more of the outstanding
shares  of its common stock; and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a
group.  The  Company  believes  that  the  beneficial owners of the common stock
listed  below,  based  on  information  furnished  by  such  owners,  have  sole
investment  and  voting  power with respect to such shares, subject to community
property  laws  where  applicable.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               Name and address              Number of Shares of  Percentage of Common
Title of class               of beneficial owner                 Common Stock            Stock(1)
--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
<S>             <C>                                          <C>                  <C>

DIRECTORS AND
OFFICERS

--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
Common Stock    Peter Gardener                                                NIL                  0.0%
                Chief Executive Officer,
                President and a Director
                201 - 20436 Fraser Highway,
                Langley, British Columbia,
                Canada, V3A 4G2

--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
Common Stock    Dean Branconnier,                               1,040,000 Shares                   7.9%
                Chief Financial Officer,
                Treasurer and a Director
                201 - 20436 Fraser Highway,
                Langley, British Columbia,
                Canada, V3A 4G2

--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
Common Stock    Chad Burback                                    1,040,000 Shares                   7.9%
                Secretary and Director
                201 - 20436 Fraser Highway,
                Langley, British Columbia,
                Canada, V3A 4G2

--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
Common Stock    All Officers and Directors as a                 2,080,000 Shares                  15.8%
                Group (3 persons)

--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
5% BENEFICIAL
SHAREHOLDERS
--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
Common Stock    Jolene and Fred Fuller                          1,250,000 Shares                   9.5%
                201 - 20436 Fraser Highway,
                Langley, British Columbia, Canada, V3A 4G2

--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
Common Stock    Terri and Lyle Veillet                          1,250,000 Shares                   9.5%
                201 - 20436 Fraser Highway,
                Langley, British Columbia,
                Canada, V3A 4G2

--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------
Common Stock    Shane & Josie Branconnier                       1,250,000 Shares                   9.5%
                201 - 20436 Fraser Highway,
                Langley, British Columbia,
                Canada, V3A 4G2
--------------  -------------------------------------------  -------------------  ---------------------


<PAGE>
<FN>
(1)  Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who,
     directly  or  indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding,
     relationship,  or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes
     the  power  to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment
     power,  which  includes  the  power to dispose or direct the disposition of
     shares.  Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than
     one  person  (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power
     to  dispose  of  the  shares).  In  addition,  shares  are  deemed  to  be
     beneficially  owned  by a person if the person has the right to acquire the
     shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date
     as  of  which  the  information  is  provided.  In computing the percentage
     ownership  of  any  person,  the  amount of shares outstanding is deemed to
     include  the  amount  of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only
     such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As of January 10, 2004,
     there  were  13,155,560  shares  of  the  Company's common stock issued and
     outstanding.
</TABLE>

================================================================================


CHANGE  IN  CONTROL

The  Company  is  not  aware of any arrangement that might result in a change in
control  in  the  future.

ITEM 12.  CERTAIN  RELATIONSHIPS  AND  RELATED  TRANSACTIONS

529473  B.C.  LTD.

529473 B.C. Ltd. is a private company owned by Mr. Rene Branconnier.

On  September  14,  2000,  the  inventors  and  former  owners  of  the  stable
enzyme-production  technology  licensed  to  Duro Solutions by 529473 B.C. Ltd.,
transferred  ownership of their intellectual property rights to 529473 B.C. Ltd.
for  a  nominal  amount.  529473  B.C.  Ltd.  is  owned by Mr. Rene Branconnier;
accordingly  he  is  the ultimate beneficiary of all agreements and arrangements
between  the  Company  and  529473  B.C.  Ltd.

On  September  21,  2000,  the  Company,  through its subsidiaries, acquired the
license  to  use  the  intellectual  property.  Under  the  terms of the License
Agreement, the Company made a US$2,500,000 promissory note bearing interest at a
rate  of 5% per annum over a period of 10 years payable to 529473 B.C. Ltd. Also
on  September  21,  2000,  the  Company became party to Research and Development
Services Agreements with 529473 B.C. Ltd. Under the terms of the Agreements, the
Company  and  its subsidiaries agreed to retain the services of 529473 B.C. Ltd.
to  provide  research,  development,  design, and related consultations.  529473
B.C. Ltd. was to receive a consulting fee at a standard rate, established by the
consultants,  and  will  charge  an  additional  15%  on  incurred  costs  as an
administrative,  overhead  and  handling  charge.  As  a  result  of the Company
acquiring the License and accrued interest, 529473 B.C. Ltd. was owed $2,752,738
under  a  note  payable  with  annual  interest  of  5%  per  annum.

The  board  of directors of the Company determined not to pursue the development
of  the  stable  enzyme  production  technology  that had been licensed to it by
529473  B.C.  Ltd.  As  a consequence of this determination, the Company entered
into  a  termination  agreement with 529473 B.C. Ltd. on May 5, 2003.  Under the
termination  agreement, the Company has agreed to the termination of all license
agreements  with  529473 B.C. Ltd. and in consideration, 529473 B.C. Ltd. agreed
to  the  cancellation  of  the  promissory  note made by the Company in favor of
529473  B.C.  Ltd.  in the principal amount of $2,500,000 and to forgive accrued
interest  of  $284,244.05  under the promissory note.  The Company had conducted
research of the stable enzyme technology but had not generated any revenues from
this  technology.  The  exchange  of  the promissory note and forgiveness of the
accrued  interest  for the termination of the license agreements resulted in the


<PAGE>
elimination  of $2,752,738 of long-term liabilities and an extraordinary gain on
license  termination of $846,744.   This extraordinary item has been recorded on
the  Company's  financial  statements  for  the  year  ended September 30, 2003.

529473  B.C.  Ltd.  has  advanced  short  term  loans  to the Company which were
outstanding in the amount of $150,790 as of September 30, 2003.

PACIFIC  OCEAN  RESOURCES  CORPORATION

Pacific  Ocean  Resources  Corporation  is  a  private company owned by Mr. Rene
Branconnier.  During  the  fiscal  years  ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, the
Company  entered  into short-term loans with Pacific Ocean Resources Corporation
totaling  $847,674  as  of  September  30,  2003.

SANCLAIR  HOLDINGS  LTD.

Sanclair  Holdings  Ltd.  is  a private company owned by Sharon Branconnier, the
wife  of  Rene  Branconnier.  Sanclair  Holdings  advanced  short  term loans of
$108,946  to  the Company during the year ended September 30, 2003.  Accrued but
unpaid  rent  of  $163,118  is owed by the Company to Sanclair Holdings Ltd., in
respect  of  rental  of  research and development facilities which terminated in
December  2002.  In aggregate, the Company owes $585,458 to Sanclair Holdings as
of  September  30,  2003.

BRAMPTON  HOLDINGS  LTD.

Brampton  Holdings  Ltd.  Is  a  private company owned by Sharon Branconnier and
Jolene  Fuller,  wife and daughter, respectively, of Rene Branconnier.  Brampton
Holdings  advanced  short  term loans of $200,008 to the Company during the year
ended  September  30,  2003.  The  Company  previously  rented  a  facility from
Brampton  Holdings.  These  lease  was terminated in December 2002.  The Company
owes  Brampton  Holdings  $223,653  in  respect of accrued but unpaid rent.  The
Company  owes Brampton Holdings an additional amount of $126,692 in respect of a
four  month  administration and accounting contract entered into during the year
ended  September  30, 2002.  In aggregate, the Company owes $554,168 to Brampton
Holdings  as  of  September  30,  2003.

EARTHSCAPE  MAINTENANCE  INC.

On  January 1, 2002, the Company entered into a 36-month technology, operations,
maintenance,  research  &  development,  engineering  and  training  consulting
contract  with Earthscape Maintenance Inc., a company owned by Jolene Fuller and
Fred  Fuller,  daughter and son-in-law of Rene Branconnier.  Under this contact,
Earthscape  Maintenance  earned fees of $742,664 to September 30, 2003, of which
$572,228  were  earned during the year ended September 30, 2002 and $170,436 was
earned during the year ended September 30, 2003.  The contract was terminated on
December  13,  2002  when  the Company ceased all research activity.  Earthscape
Maintenance  has agreed to accept repayment of their accrued fees only after the
Company  has  earned  revenue.  In  aggregate,  the  Company  owes  $759,387  to
Earthscape  Maintenance  as  of  September  30,  2003.

Under  the  SEC's  rules,  Mr.  Ren  Branconnier  and  Dr. Robert Jackman may be
considered  promoters  or  founders  of  Duro Enzymes Private and, following the
October 16, 2000 voluntary share exchange, the Company.  Dr. Robert Jackman owns
600,000  shares  of  the Company and during 2002 provided consulting services to
the  Company through FL Tech Inc. for which $2,580 was paid. In 2003 Mr. Jackman
provided  no  consulting  services  to  the  Company.  Mr. Ren  Branconnier owns
300,000  shares  of  the Company and during 2003 provided consulting services to
the  Company through Sanclair Holdings Ltd. for which $126,050 was accrued.  Mr.
Ren  Branconnier  also  owns  529473  B.C.  Ltd.; accordingly he is the ultimate
beneficiary  of  all  agreements and arrangements between the Company and 529473
B.C.  Ltd.  The  agreements  between  529473  B.C.  Ltd. and the Company and its
subsidiaries  were  approved  by  the  Company's  Board of Directors.  FL Tech a
company  controlled  by  Dr. Robert Jackman performed consulting work for 529473
B.C.  Ltd.  in  2002;  Mr.  Dean  Branconnier  and  Mr. Chad Burback are Mr. Ren
Branconnier's  nephews.


<PAGE>
ITEM 13.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT
NUMBER                  DESCRIPTION
------                  -----------

3.1****        Amended  and  Restated  Articles  of  Incorporation  dated
               February  5,  2001

3.2****        Amended  and  Restated  Bylaws  dated  January  8,  2001

4.1**          Specimen  Stock  Certificate  for  Shares  of Common Stock of the
               Company

10.1****       Lease  Agreement  dated  December  12,  2001

10.2***        License  and  Distribution Agreement between 529473 B.C. Ltd. and
               Duro  Enzyme  Solutions  Inc. (U.S.), as amended, dated September
               21,  2000

10.3*          Research  and  Development Services Agreement between 529473 B.C.
               Ltd.  and  Duro Enzyme Solutions Inc. (Canada), as amended, dated
               September  21,  2000

10.4*          Research  and  Development Services Agreement between 529473 B.C.
               Ltd.  and  Duro  Enzyme  Solutions Inc. (U.S.), as amended, dated
               September  21,  2000

10.5******     Termination  of  License  Agreements  between  the  Duro  Enzyme
               Solutions  Inc.  (Nevada),  Duro Enzyme Solutions Inc. (B.C.) and
               529473  B.C.  Ltd.  dated  May  5,  2003  (1)

16.1*****      Letter  from  BDO  Dunwoody,  Chartered  Accountants, to the U.S.
               Securities  and  Exchange  Commission

16.2*****      Letter  from  Raber  Mattuck,  Chartered Accountants, to the U.S.
               Securities  and  Exchange  Commission

21.1           List  of  Subsidiaries

23.1           Consent of the Independent Accountant - R. Richard Hawkins II

23.2           Consent of the Independent Accountant - Weinberg & Company

31.1           Certification  of  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial
               Officer  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
               to  Section  302  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  (2)

32.1           Certification  of  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial
               Officer  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
               to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  (2)

*  Filed  on  November  20,  2000, as an exhibit to the Company's report on Form
10-QSB  for the three months ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by
reference
**  Filed  on  December  29,  2000,  as an exhibit to the Company's transitional
report  on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  nine  months  ended  September  30, 2000 and
incorporated  herein  by  reference
***  Filed  on  February 14, 2001, as an exhibit to the Company's report on Form
10-QSB  for  the three months ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by
reference.
**** Filed on May 15, 2001, as an exhibit to the Company's report on Form 10-QSB
for the three months ended March 31, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
*****  Filed on December 29, 2001, as an exhibit to the Company's report on Form
10-KSB  for  the  year  ended  September  30,  2001,  and incorporated herein by
reference.
******  Filed  on August 14, 2003, as an exhibit to the Company's report on Form
10-QSB  for  the  three  months  ended June 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by
reference.


<PAGE>
REPORTS  ON  FORM  8-K

None

ITEM  14.     PRINCIPAL  ACCOUNTANT  FEES  AND  SERVICES.

AUDIT  FEES

The  aggregate  fees billed for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 and the
period  from  inception to September 30, 2003 for professional services rendered
by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and
review  of the financial statements included in our Form 10-KSB or services that
are  normally  provided  by  the  accountant  in  connection  with statutory and
regulatory  filings  or  engagements  for these fiscal periods were estimated at
$37,753.

AUDIT  RELATED  FEES

None.

TAX  FEES

None.

ALL  OTHER  FEES

None.


<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES
                                   ----------

In  accordance  with  Section  13  or  15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

                      EAPI  ENTERTAINMENT,  INC.

                      By:  /s/  Peter  Gardner
                         -------------------------
                         Peter  Gardner
                         Chief  Executive  Officer
                         President  and  Director

                         Date:  March 17, 2004
                              ----------------


In  accordance  with  the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following  persons  on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates  indicated.

                      By:  /s/  Peter  Gardner        Date: March 17, 2004
                         -------------------------          --------------
                         Peter Gardner
                         President and Director


                      By:  /s/  Dean  Branconnier     Date: March 17, 2004
                         -------------------------          --------------
                         Dean Branconnier
                         Treasurer and Director


                      By:  /s/  Chad  Burback         Date: March 17, 2004
                         -------------------------          --------------
                         Chad Burback
                         Secretary and Director


<PAGE>