alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**Section 302 Certification**I, Wayne L. Laufer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this March 31, 2006 Form 10-Q of Bois d’Arc Energy, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:May 11, 2006                                                         /s/ WAYNE L. LAUFER   Chief Executive Officer
Amedment to Change in Control and Severance Agmt



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 CHANGE IN CONTROL AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and
entered into as of the 13th day of January, 2009 by and between CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc., a Florida banking corporation (the
“Corporation”) and John C. Corbett (the “Executive”). 
 BACKGROUND 
 The Corporation and the Executive entered into a Change in Control and Severance Agreement dated July 11, 2006 (the “Agreement”). The
parties desire to enter into this Amendment to amend certain provisions of the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises
and of the covenants and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Corporation and the Executive covenant and agree as follows: 
 1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement, unless otherwise provided in this
Amendment. 
 2. Amendment of Section 6 of Agreement. Section 6 of the Agreement is amended by deleting the first two paragraphs of
Section 6 in their entirety, and inserting the following section in lieu thereof: 
 Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, the
Corporation shall pay Executive as severance pay or liquidated damages, or both, a lump sum cash payment equal to 2.5 times (two and one-half times) the Executive’s annual base salary. Such payment will be paid to the Executive no later than
the date of the Change of Control. The term annual base salary shall refer to the Executive’s then current base salary annualized and does not include cash bonus payments, if any, for services rendered to the Corporation or any subsidiary. The
foregoing shall be in addition to any other rights that the Executive may be entitled to under any other agreements with, or benefit plans of, the Corporation or any subsidiary. 
 The remaining paragraph of that Section 6 shall remain in full force and effect. 
 3. Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms, covenants and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  

 4 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

  

					
	“CORPORATION”	 	“EXECUTIVE”
		
	CENTERSTATE BANKS OF FLORIDA, INC.	 	JOHN C. CORBETT
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Ernest S. Pinner
	 	 /s/ John C. Corbett

		 	Ernest S. “Ernie” Pinner	 	John C. Corbett
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	

  

 5
Form of Waiver


 Exhibit 10.2 
 FORM OF WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s
participation in the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to
comply with the regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I
acknowledge that this regulation may require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer
or in which I participate as they relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned
regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these
regulations on my employment relationship. 
  

			
	
		
	By:	 	 
		 	[Senior Executive Officer]
Exhibit 19

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-37 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-37 Filed 11/28/18 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-37 Filed 11/28/18 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-37 Filed 11/28/18 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-44462, 333-44756, 333-60138 and
333-60136) pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1995 Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Option Plan, 2000 CEO Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan, 2001 UK Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the UK company Share Option Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-98095) of Pharsight
Corporation and in the related Prospectus of our report dated April 23, 2003 (except Note 15, as to which the date is May 28, 2003), with respect to the financial statements and
schedule of Pharsight Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2003.



San
Jose, California
June 4, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Allonge No. 2 to Promissory Notes between the Company and Joseph Hines



 Exhibit 10.32 
  
 ALLONGE NO. 2 TO 
 PROMISSORY NOTES 
 TO JOSEPH HINES 
 This Allonge No. 2 to Promissory Notes (the “Allonge No. 2”), dated as of December 31, 2008, is attached to and forms a
part of the following Promissory Notes (collectively, the “Notes”), made by SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of JOSEPH HINES, an individual residing in the state
of Arizona (the “Holder”): 
  

	 	1.	Promissory Note dated December 31, 2006, in the original principal amount of $447,000. 

  

	 	2.	Promissory Note dated March 31, 2007, in the original principal amount of $63,600. 

  

	 	3.	Promissory Note dated December 31, 2007, in the original principal amount of $55,000. 

 The Notes are hereby amended to provide that they are due and payable in full on June 30, 2009. 
 In all other respects, the Notes are confirmed, ratified, and approved and, as amended by this Allonge No. 2, shall continue in full force and
effect. This Allonge No. 2 replaces the Allonge to Promissory Notes dated March 31, 2008, which shall have no further force or effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have caused this Allonge No. 2 to Promissory Notes to be executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date and year first above written. 
  

			
	SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael Kirksey
	Its:	 	 Michael Kirksey
 Executive Vice President and
COO



  
  

	
	 Accepted and agreed to:
  
 JOSEPH HINES

	
	/s/ Joseph Hines
Exhibit 99.3
 
  
    Net Reserves
    
    
    Future Net Cash Flow (M$)Oil
    
    
    NGL
    
    
    Gas
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Present Worth atCategory
    
    (Barrels)
    
    
    (Barrels)
    
    
    (Mcf)
    
    
    Total
    
    
    10%Proved DevelopedProducing
    
    
    96,802
    
    
    
    4,169,099
    
    
    
    224,249,296
    
    
    $
    429,651
    
    
    $
    216,758Non-Producing
    
    
    8,238
    
    
    
    441,206
    
    
    
    57,317,156
    
    
    $
    94,745
    
    
    $
    43,008Proved Undeveloped
    
    
    197,210
    
    
    
    6,485,249
    
    
    
    219,729,550
    
    
    $
    226,616
    
    
    $
    24,666Total Proved(1)
    
    
    302,250
    
    
    
    11,095,554
    
    
    
    501,296,002
    
    
    $
    751,012
    
    
    $
    284,432
 
 1)
    
    The total proved values above may or may
not match those values on the total proved summary page that
follows this letter due to rounding by the economics
program.    




---



##### 



  




---



##### 



  




---



##### 



Very truly yours,LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. 
State of Texas
Registration Number F-1360By:
    
    /s/ Al lakovakisAl lakovakisManager of Unconventional Resource EvaluationSenior Staff EngineerBy:
    
    /s/ William M. Kazmann

William M. KazmannLicensed Professional EngineerState of Texas No. 45012
 
  
   
Exhibit
31.2





Certification
Pursuant to


Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
Amended





I, Gary Hokkanen,
certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Eiger Technology,
Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s
internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:  March
      31, 2008
            By: /s/
      Gary HokkanenName: Gary
      HokkanenTitle: Chief
      Financial Officer
C.R. v. STATE

CR-15-1168

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Ronald Charles PUGH v. STATE

CR-16-1287

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018 Reh. denied March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSE RAMOS

, Appellant,

v.

GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, as subrogee of Michael Illes

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2461

[ August 22, 2019 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case

No. CACE16012441

.

Jose Ramos, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Sharon C. Degnan of Kubicki Draper, Orlando, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

L EVINE

, C.J., W ARNER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Unionamerica’s motion for sanctions is DENIED for the

reason expressed at the September hearing. Unionamerica’s

objections to Fort Miller’s appendix filed in support of its

supplemental brief are DENIED.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO.,

LIMITED, Successor-ininterest to ST. PAUL

REINSURANCE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.,

THE FORT MILLER CO. and

BEECHE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C05-1912 BZ

AMENDED ORDER STAYING

COUNTERCLAIM AND DENYING

REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

(Corrects tentative date

of Jury Trial)

 Following the supplemental hearing held on October 29,

2008, Unionamerica’s 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Fort Miller’s

counterclaim is taken under submission.1 IT IS FURTHER

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Should the motion be denied, for purposes of trial,

the counterclaim will be severed from the rescission claim. 

The trial scheduled to commence February 23, 2009 will be

limited to Unionamerica’s claims and Fort Miller’s answer and

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 175 Filed 10/30/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

its affirmative defenses. If the policy is rescinded, the

counterclaim will be dismissed. If not, the court will

schedule a trial on the counterclaim. I have tentatively

reserved the date of September 21, 2009 for a one week jury

trial.

2. All discovery dealing exclusively with issues

presented by the counterclaim, such as expert discovery on

bad faith issues, is STAYED. I recognize that there may be

an overlap in discovery between the rescission claim and the

counterclaim. It is not my intention to stay any discovery

which may lead to the production of evidence admissible on

the rescission claim. By Monday, November 3, 2008, each

party shall advise the court in writing which, if any, of the

discovery matters presently before the court have not been

stayed and still need to be decided. 

Dated: October 30, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\UNIONAMERICA V. FORT MILLER\AMENDED ORDER STAYING

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS.wpd

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 175 Filed 10/30/08 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Tuesday, February 11, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on February 13, 2024.

# PLACE: 

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtual (this meeting will be a hybrid meeting).

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Myles Martin, Deputy Press Officer, telephone: (202) 694-1221.

      ( print page 9082)    
(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2025-02373 Filed 2-4-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

OLEN W. BRAMLETT, 694397, §

Petitioner, §

§

v. § 3:05-CV-2394-K

§ ECF

DOUGLAS DRETKE, DIRECTOR, §

TEXAS DEPT. OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, §

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION §

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 9th day of January , 2006.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00015-A Document 13 Filed 01/09/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 52
Nathan Andre HESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 24 (Thursday, February 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02297]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20971 and #20972; ALASKA Disaster Number AK-
20012]

Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Alaska

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4859-
DR), dated January 15, 2025.
    Incident: Severe Storm and Flooding.

DATES: Issued on January 15, 2025.
    Incident Period: October 20, 2024 through October 23, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: March 31, 2025.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: October 31, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on January 15, 2025, Private 
Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a 
governmental nature may file disaster loan applications online using 
the MySBA Loan Portal https://lending.sba.gov or other locally 
announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance 
customer service center by email at [email protected] or 
by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Bering Strait Regional Educational Attendance Area 
(REAA), Northwest Arctic Borough.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.250
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.250
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.250
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 209716 
and for economic injury is 209720.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2025-02297 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
Ramon VENEGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-37

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

BLACK, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.