alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ADAPTREND, INC.,
Appellant

v.

NARITA EXPORT LLC,
Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1195

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

92074784

.

______________________

O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) withi n the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in Case: 23-1195 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 03/29/2023A DAPTREND

, I NC

. V

. N ARITA E XPORT LLC 2

accordance with the rules.

FOR THE COURT

March 29, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 29, 2023 Case: 23-1195 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 03/29/2023
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                FDA Basics

FDA Basics

                        FDA Fundamentals


                        Respuestas a preguntas frecuentes sobre la FDA Home
          About FDA
          Transparency
          FDA Basics
          How many people are employed by FDA and in what areas do they work?FDA Basics How many people are employed by FDA and in what areas do they work?
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintPlease see the Distribution of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Employment Program Level (PDF - 156KB) table.

Resources For You

Contact FDA
	FDA Leadership Profiles
	FDA Organization
	FDA Acronyms and Abbreviations

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      01/08/2021FDA Basics

          
                        FDA Fundamentals


                        Respuestas a preguntas frecuentes sobre la FDA
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of AAA Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended  January 31, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date:  March 16, 2006


/s/ Dr. Earl Abbott
---------------------------------------
Dr. Earl Abbott, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors of ChoicePoint Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August
12, 1999 on the consolidated financial statements of I.R.S.C., Inc. and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998, which appears as Exhibit 99.2
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2000, in the previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8
of ChoicePoint Inc. (File Nos. 333-32453 and 333-37498).


                                              /s/ Corbin & Wertz
                                              --------------------------------
                                              CORBIN & WERTZ


Irvine, California
March 26, 2001
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A. Cloutier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ PAUL A. CLOUTIER                                 |  |  |  | Dated: November 1, 2007
|Paul A. Cloutier                                     |  |  |  |                        
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
A.M.P., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-22

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all those by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert N. Tenczar, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for such person and in
his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the Form 10K for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2000 of MMI Products, Inc. under the Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign
the Form 10K in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as a director of MMI Products, Inc., and any and all amendments or supplements to the Form 10K. The undersigned further grants unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, acting alone, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact
and agent, or his substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





|SIGNATURE                | TITLE   
|------------------------ | --------
|                         |         
|/s/ Thomas F. McWilliams | Director
|Thomas F. McWilliams     |         
|                         |         
|Date:  February 20, 2001 |         
|                         |         
|                         |         
|SIGNATURE                | TITLE   
|                         |         
|/s/ Carl L. Blonkvist    | Director
|Carl L. Blonkvist        |         
|                         |         
|Date:  February 28, 2001 |         
|                         |         
|                         |         
|SIGNATURE                | TITLE   
|                         |         
|/s/ Stuyvesant Comfort   | Director
|Stuyvesant Comfort       |         
|                         |         
|Date:  February 23, 2001 |
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 24 (Thursday, February 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02266]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 6, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 28, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1323 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1160, K2025-1160.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-02266 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION  I, David R. Malmstedt, Chief Executive Officer of Vincera, Inc. (Principal Financial Officer), certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vincera, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. [paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instruction contained in SEC Release 34-47986] c. evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting. Date:  November 14, 2007  /s/ David R. Malmstedt Name: David R. Malmstedt Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)   1
Bakari D. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2322

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 30, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and MaryEllen M. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, Taylor and Ciklin, JJ., concur.
Rafael LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3034

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 21

                      Subsidiaries of Audio Book Club, Inc.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                      Ownership                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation

<S>                                       <C>                                     <C>
ABC Investment Corp.                      wholly-owned                            Delaware

ABC Internet Services Inc.                wholly-owned                            New York

Classic Radio Holding Corp.               wholly-owned                            Delaware

CH Acquisitions Corp.                     wholly-owned                            Delaware

Classic Radio Acquisition Corp.           wholly-owned by                         Delaware
                                          Classic Radio Holding Corp.

ABD Acquisition Corp.                     wholly-owned                            Delaware

Radio Spirits, Inc.                       wholly-owned                            Delaware

Multimedia Fulfillment, Inc.              wholly-owned by Classic 
                                          Radio Holding Corp.                     Delaware

BooksAloud, Inc.                          wholly-owned                            Florida
</TABLE>
Glen CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3808

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1Even though Thompson has asserted a specific objection to the magistrate

judge’s report as to only one claim, the Court has completed a de novo review of

the entire case. 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

VENCE THOMPSON, §

Petitioner, §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:06-CV-082-Y

§

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, §

Director, T.D.C.J. § 

Correctional Institutions Div., §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

 

In this action brought by petitioner Vence Thompson under 28

U.S.C. § 2254, the Court has made an independent review of the

following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

January 19, 2007; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on March 2, 2007.

The Court, after de novo review,1

 concludes that Thompson’s

objection must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus should be denied, for the reasons stated in the

magistrate judge's findings and conclusions. 

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Vence Thompson’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

SIGNED March 6, 2007.

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00082-Y Document 29 Filed 03/06/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 138
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT

Scott Sagaria (State Bar No.217981)

sjsagaria@sagarialaw.com

Elliot Gale (State Bar No. 263326)

egale@sagarialaw.com

Joe Angelo (State Bar No. 268542)

jangelo@sagarialaw.com

SAGARIA LAW, P.C.

3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 100

Roseville, California 95661

Telephone: (408) 279-2288

Facsimile: (408) 279-2299

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — OAKLAND DIVISION

STACY CASE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EQUIFAX INC.; et. al.,

Defendants.

Federal Case No.: 4:17-CV-00399-JSW

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT F&A 

FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PURSUANT 

TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Stacy Case, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1), hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant F&A Federal Credit Union as to all claims in 

this action, with prejudice.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part:

41(a) Voluntary Dismissal 

(1) By the Plaintiff

(a) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(3), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any 

applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court 

order by filing: 

Case 4:17-cv-00399-JSW Document 37 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT 

a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a 

motion for summary judgment. 

Defendant F&A Federal Credit Union has neither answered Plaintiff’s Complaint, nor filed 

a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the matter may be dismissed against it for all 

purposes and without an Order of the Court. 

Dated: June 15, 2017 Sagaria Law, P.C. 

By: /s/ Elliot W. Gale

Elliot W. Gale

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Stacy Case 

Case 4:17-cv-00399-JSW Document 37 Filed 06/15/17 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 18 PageID 270
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 18 PageID 271
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 3 of 18 PageID 272
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 4 of 18 PageID 273
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 5 of 18 PageID 274
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 6 of 18 PageID 275
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 7 of 18 PageID 276
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 8 of 18 PageID 277
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 9 of 18 PageID 278
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 10 of 18 PageID 279
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 11 of 18 PageID 280
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 12 of 18 PageID 281
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 13 of 18 PageID 282
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 14 of 18 PageID 283
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 15 of 18 PageID 284
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 16 of 18 PageID 285
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 17 of 18 PageID 286
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 45 Filed 02/22/06 Page 18 of 18 PageID 287
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDY WILKINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY C. VANCOTT,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00340-YGR (PR)

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

That Plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed in accordance with the Court’s 

Order, and that each party bear its own costs of action.

Dated:

______________________________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Judge

August 7, 2018
Samuel Yamil MENDEZ-CARMONA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 27, 2019

Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . *See* *State v. Welker,* 536 So.2d 1017, 1019-20 (Fla. 1988) ("[T]he giving of consent is a verbal act, and therefore testimony that someone has given consent is not hearsay." (quoting *Welker v. State,* 504 So.2d 802, 806 n.3 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) ) ).

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
# L_2017078DE.01007401.xml

| 23.3.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 78/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 78/74

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2017/127 des Rates vom 20. Januar 2017 zur Festsetzung der Fangmöglichkeiten für 2017 für bestimmte Fischbestände und Bestandsgruppen in den Unionsgewässern sowie für Fischereifahrzeuge der Union in bestimmten Nicht-Unionsgewässern

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 24 vom 28. Januar 2017
  )

Auf Seite 85, Anhang IA, Tabelle „Sprotte und dazugehörige Beifänge“ (Gebiet: IIIa (SPR/03A.)), Fußnote 1, Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Unbeschadet der Pflicht zur Anlandung dürfen Beifänge von Kliesche, Wittling und Schellfisch bis zu 5 % der Quote umfassen (OTH/*03A4).“

muss es heißen:

„Unbeschadet der Pflicht zur Anlandung dürfen Beifänge von Kliesche, Wittling und Schellfisch bis zu 5 % der Quote umfassen (OTH/*03A.).“

Auf Seite 86, Anhang IA, Tabelle „Sprotte und dazugehörige Beifänge“ (Gebiet: Unionsgewässer von IIa und IV (SPR/2AC4-C)), Fußnote 1, Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Unbeschadet der Pflicht zur Anlandung dürfen Beifänge von Kliesche und Wittling bis zu 2 % der Quote umfassen (OTH/*02AC4C).“

muss es heißen:

„Unbeschadet der Pflicht zur Anlandung dürfen Beifänge von Kliesche und Wittling bis zu 2 % der Quote umfassen (OTH/*2AC4C).“

---