alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JANSSEN DOYLE LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT L AW

2540 CAMINO DIABLO, S UITE 220 

WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597 

925.295-1805 PHONE - 925.295-1801 FAX 

 rdoyle@jd-law.com 

April 23, 2006 

Honorable William H. Alsup 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

Courtroom 9, 19th Floor 

San Francisco, Ca 94104 

RE: Chiron v. SourceCF et al.,, Case No. c 05-01938

Dear Judge Alsup, 

 At today’s hearing, you asked when I first learned of Exhibits 215 and 216, in 

light of the questions I asked of Dr. Challoner. I responded to your inquiry, at that time, 

to the best of my recollection. 

 Immediately upon returning to my office, I investigated this issue. Based on that 

investigation, I would like to clarify and correct statements made to the Court based on 

my investigation of the questions you raised in today’s proceedings. 

 As to the letter which is Exhibit No. 215, the facts as represented in Court are 

accurate. I have confirmed that this letter was received from PARI on Wednesday, April 

19th in response to an email inquiry from Mr. Walters on April 19th. Neither Mr. Walters 

nor I had seen Exhibit No. 215 previously. 

 My mistake, however, was my recollection that I received both letters in that 

fashion, and that is not correct based on my investigation. 

 As to the letter which is Exhibit No. 216 (directed to the Division of Dockets 

Management of the Food and Drug Administration) a link to it was received via email by 

a paralegal in my office who, on April 13th, had requested any such letters from Mr. 

Walters; I followed the link and downloaded the letter from the internet on April 15th 

and, although I now have no personal recollection of when it was reviewed, I must have 

reviewed it prior to the start of trial on April 17th and prior to my cross examination of 

Dr. Challoner on that same day. 

 You may recall that Mr. Walters testified that he had seen Exhibit No. 216 

previously on the FDA website. I decided to further investigate if my office had prior 

knowledge of the letter, much as you requested of Chiron at the end of today’s 

Case3:05-cv-01938-WHA Document116 Filed04/24/06 Page1 of 2
The Honorable William H. Alsup 

April 23, 2006 

Page 2 of 2 

proceedings. A link to this letter was received by my office on January 23, 2006 from 

Mr. Walters. Neither of us have a recollection of reviewing Exhibit No. 216 at that time. 

The first time I recall reviewing this letter was after it was downloaded on April 15th. 

 Mr. Walters and I will be available in the morning to respond to any inquiries you 

might have. 

 Very truly yours, 

 JANSSEN DOYLE llp 

 /s/ 

Richard P. Doyle, Jr. 

cc: Mark Petersen, Esq. 

RPD/hs 

Case3:05-cv-01938-WHA Document116 Filed04/24/06 Page2 of 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00711-CR

IN RE Damaso PECHE, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceedings1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 17, 2010

DISMISSED 

On January 6, 2010, the Honorable Oscar J. Hale entered an order granting Relator’s 

Motion for Modification Judgment of Conviction. In accordance with said order, Relator’s

Petition for Writ of Mandamus is Dismissed as Moot.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006-CRP-000876, styled State of Texas v. Damso Peche, Jr., 

pending in the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable O.J. Hale, Jr. presiding.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

RISENHOOVER, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 17-00326 BLF (PR) 

JUDGMENT

The Court has dismissed all claims against Defendants and granted their motions for 

summary judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: __June 18, 2020____________ ________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Judgment

PRO-SE\BLF\CR.17\00326Hollis_judgment

Case 5:17-cv-00326-BLF Document 142 Filed 06/18/20 Page 1 of 1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129298 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129298 COA: 252847 Calhoun CC: 03-000218-FC KEITH ADAM LORD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
Alonzo MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-0126

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 19, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Andrea Duhreal FLAGG

CR-17-0324

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
EXHIBIT 4

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-4 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Fred Lee BRYANT

1170044 (CR-16-0772)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHAIRMAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








The
      undersigned hereby certifies that the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
      Millstream II Acquisition Corporation (“the Registrant”) for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.




Dated:
      November 14, 2006




/s/
                Arthur SpectorArthur
                SpectorChairman
                of the Board,President
                and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
                (Principal executive,financial
                and accounting officer)
022318.0001\5328741.1 12/26/2018 1

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00291-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Frank M. Radoslovich, SBN 161457 Joshua D. Cohen (Bar no. 184067)

Email: frank@radshap.com Email: jcohen@wendel.com

Omid Shabani, SBN 267447 Katherine Kao (Bar No. 267475)

Email: omid@radshap.com Email: kkao@wendel.com

RADOSLOVICH | SHAPIRO, PC WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP

701 University Avenue, Suite 100 1111 Broadway, 24th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95825 Oakland, California 94607-4036

Telephone: (916) 565-8161 Tel: (510) 834-6600

Facsimile: (916) 565-8170 Fax: (510) 834-1928

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Nguyen Thanh Tu

Vietnam Reform Party

(a/k/a/ Việt Nam Canh Tân 

Cách Mạng Ðảng or Viet Tan), 

an unincorporated association

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

VIETNAM REFORM PARTY (a/k/a/ Việt 

Nam Canh Tân Cách Mạng Ðảng or Viet Tan), 

an unincorporated association, 

 Plaintiff,

v. 

VIET TAN - VIETNAM REFORM PARTY, a 

California nonprofit corporation; NGUYÊN 

THANH TU, an individual; MICHELLE 

DUONG, an individual; and DOES 1 through 

50 inclusive,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 4:17-CV-00291-HSG

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS 

TO DEFENDANT NGUYEN THANH TU 

ONLY.

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

Courtroom No.: 2—4

th Floor

TO THE HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND COUNSEL:

Plaintiff, Vietnam Reform Party (hereinafter “Viet Tan”) and defendant Nguyen Thanh 

Tu (hereinafter “Nguyen Tu”), acting though counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement entered into 

by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action against defendant Nguyen Tu, only. 
022318.0001\5328741.1 12/26/2018 2

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00291-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: December 26, 2018 RADOSLOVICH | SHAPIRO, PC

/s/ Omid Shabani

FRANK M. RADOSLOVICH

OMID SHABANI

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: December 26, 2018 Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP

/s/ Joshua D. Cohen____________

Joshua D. Cohen

Attorneys for defendant Nguyen Thanh Tu
022318.0001\5328741.1 12/26/2018 3

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00291-HSG

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

The stipulation is approved. The action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, as to 

defendant Nguyen Thanh Tu only. 

__________________________________

JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

DATED: 12/27/2018
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stinger
Systems, Inc., for the period ended September 30, 2005;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: December 29, 2005
    By:

/s/ David J. MeadorDavid J. MeadorChief Financial Officer
Notice of Regular Meeting

of the Board of Directors

of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

December 13, 2023

SUMMARY: Notice of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Farm 

Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) is hereby given in accordance with the 

provisions of the Bylaws of the FCSIC.

DATES: 10 a.m., Wednesday, December 13, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may observe the open portions of this meeting in person at 1501 Farm 

Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to observe, at 

least 24 hours in advance, visit FCSIC.gov, select “News & Events,” then select “Board 

Meetings.” From there, access the linked “Instructions for board meeting visitors” and 

complete the described registration process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you need more information or assistance for 

accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley Waldron, Secretary to the Board. 

Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-4056.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The 

rest of the meeting will be closed to the public. The following matters will be considered:

Portions Open to the Public:

• Approval of Minutes for October 11, 2023

• Quarterly FCSIC Financial Reports

• Quarterly Report on Insured Obligations

• Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan

• Strategic Plan 2024-2029

Portions Closed to the Public:

• Report on Insurance Risk

• Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act Review

• Audit Plan for the Year Ended December 31, 2023

• Executive Session of the Audit Committee with Auditor

______________________

Ashley Waldron

Secretary to the Board

November 30, 2023

Date
David Jacob BARROW v. STATE

CR-16-0964

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Intelli-Check, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Dated:          March 29, 2006              /s/ Frank Mandelbaum
                                            ---------------------
                                            Name:    Frank Mandelbaum
                                            Title:   Chief Executive Officer

Dated:          March 29, 2006
                                            /s/ Edwin Winiarz
                                            ---------------------
                                            Name:    Edwin Winiarz
                                            Title:   Chief Financial Officer



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
Nathan Michael HAIFLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2746

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                           1,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,926
<INVENTORY>                                     62,347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,897
<PP&E>                                          92,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,043
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           252
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,259)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,226
<SALES>                                        418,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               418,355
<CGS>                                          350,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  350,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,930
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
James D. JOHNSON, Sr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4510

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**Rule 15d-14(d)**

I, James Leonard, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Fifth Third Auto Trust 2017-1 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be providedunder Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 
 4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

 
 5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
**

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to meby the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National Association and The Bank of New York Mellon. 

March 28, 2019 

 

**Fifth Third Holdings Funding, LLC,** as Depositor

 

By:
 
/s/ James Leonard

Name: James Leonard

Title: President

(senior officer in charge of securitization)

*Certification pursuant to*

*Rule 15d-14(d) (FTAT 2017-1)*
1

Case No. 16-CV-07013-LHK 

ORDER RE: FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ABDUL NEVAREZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL 

COMPANY, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-CV-07013-LHK 

ORDER RE: FINAL APPROVAL 

HEARING

At the July 16, 2020 final approval hearing, the parties should be prepared to answer the 

following questions:

1) Have there been any updates to the number of claim forms that have been received by 

the Settlement Administrator since the parties’ July 2, 2020 supplemental brief?

2) On average, how many claimed visits were there per claim form?

3) What is the average anticipated recovery per Damages Class Member? What is the 

median anticipated recovery per Damages Class Member?

4) What is the expected total recovery for each Named Plaintiff (i.e., Requested Service 

Award plus Damages)?

5) How many ADA cases have each of the Named Plaintiffs brought to date?

Case 4:16-cv-07013-HSG Document 413 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 16-CV-07013-LHK 

ORDER RE: FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 16, 2020

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 4:16-cv-07013-HSG Document 413 Filed 07/16/20 Page 2 of 2