alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Pacult, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc., the managing member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC(the "Fund" or the "Registrant"), does hereby certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

  (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

  (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



By: /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult



Date: May 15, 2006
Luis AVILA and Cristine Rosenhaim, Appellants, v. HMC ASSETS, LLC Solely in its Capacity as Separate Trustee for CAM XVIII Trust and Riviera Bella Master Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-1929

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 31, 2019

Tanner Andrews, of Tanner Andrews, P.A., Deland, for Appellant.

Ashland R. Medley and Wendy S. Griffith, of Ashland Medley Law, PLLC, Coral Springs, for Appellee, HMC Assets, LLC Solely in its Capacity as Separate Trustee for CAM XVIII Trust.

No appearance for Appellee, Riviera Bella Master Association, Inc.

COHEN, J.

Luis Avila and Cristine Rosenhaim ("the Avilas") appeal the final summary judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of HMC Assets, LLC Solely in its Capacity as Separate Trustee for Cam XVIII Trust and Riviera Bella Master Association, Inc. ("HMC"). We affirm without discussion. However, we write to comment upon the trial court's reservation of jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment against the Avilas following the foreclosure sale.

HMC attempted to effectuate personal service on the Avilas but could not locate them. Instead, it properly effectuated constructive service. The Avilas maintained their objection to personal jurisdiction throughout the proceedings. The trial court entered a final summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of HMC and reserved jurisdiction to enter further orders, including a deficiency judgment against the Avilas following the foreclosure sale.

"A personal money judgment necessitates in personam jurisdiction over the defendant," but "[c]onstructive service *1135confers only in rem or quasi in rem jurisdiction upon the court." *Honegger v. Coastal Fertilizer & Supply, Inc.*, 712 So. 2d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (citations omitted). Accordingly, the court never acquired the necessary in personam jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment against the Avilas, and entry of such would be improper.1

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

1

We note that HMC is not precluded from personally serving the Avilas and obtaining a deficiency judgment. A plaintiff is not required to obtain personal jurisdiction in an initial foreclosure action in order to bring a deficiency action in the future. *NCNB Nat'l Bank of Fla. v. Pyramid Corp.*, 497 So. 2d 1353, 1355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00373

- CR

Geronimo Scott Aguilar

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1327533D )

April 6, 2017

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on a ppeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY GARY L. TILLETT

PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary L. Tillett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Walter Investment Management Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (this Report); and

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary L. Tillett                                 
|Gary L. Tillett                                     
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: August 14, 2014
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Ha ley and Senior Judge Coleman

INLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGING, INC. AND INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1188-06-2 PER CURIAM AUGUST 29, 2006 JUNIUS NELSON, JR.

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Angela C. Fleming; Midkiff, M uncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellants. (Louis D. Snesil; Marks & Ha rrison, on brief), for appellee.

Inland Paperboard and Packaging, Inc. and it s insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Junius Ne lson, Jr. proved his disability and medical treatment after November 18, 2004 were causally related to his compensable September 7, 2004 injury by accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion, and we hold that this appeal is without merit. Accordi ngly, we affirm the comm ission’s decision for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Nelson v. Inland Paperboard and Packaging, Inc. , VWC File No. 220-91-68 (April 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the KMG America Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of KMG America Corporation.

 

| Date: November 8, 2006 | /s/ Kenneth U. Kuk                                                                           |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Kenneth U. Kuk

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KMG America Corporation and will be retained by KMG America Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01705]

[[Page 8143]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; Meeting of the Judicial 
Conference

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules will hold an in-
person meeting in hybrid format with remote attendance options on April 
3, 2025 in Atlanta, GA. The meeting is open to the public for 
observation but not participation. Please see the Supplementary 
Information section in this notice for instructions on observing the 
meeting.

DATES: April 3, 2025 (meeting date) and March 27, 2025 (registration 
deadline for in-person observation).

ADDRESSES: An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 
days in advance of the meeting at: https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/records-rules-committees/agenda-books.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelly Cox, Rules Committee Staff, 
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal 
Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 
20544, Phone (202) 502-1820, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To observe the meeting in person, 
individuals must contact the office listed above by 5 p.m. (eastern 
time) on March 27, 2025. After this deadline, only remote observation 
is permitted. Remote registration is available until the meeting date, 
provided it is completed before the projected end time.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

    Dated: January 21, 2025.
Shelly L. Cox,
Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2025-01705 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Stinger
Systems, Inc., for the period ended September 30, 2007;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Brian S. GannonBrian S. GannonPrincipal Financial and
Accounting Officer
Clifford SCOTT v. STATE

CR-16-0790

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 MAUI JIM, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C05-01885 MJJ

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service

of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been

delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to

the calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: 5/16/2006 

MARTIN J. JENKINS

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01885-MJJ Document 59 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 1
ELIO MOTORS, INC. v. LOUISIANA MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION

NO. 2019-C-0656

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.

HUGHES, J., would grant in part.
R.H. v. WALKER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160914

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 6, 2018

Dismissed.
Ernest WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-5282

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Intelliservices, Inc., a Delaware corporation, does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 of Intelliservices, Inc. fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Intelliservices, Inc.

Date: February 14, 2005                    /s/ Timothy P. Beck
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Timothy P. Beck
                                           Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 14, 2005                    /s/ Timothy P. Beck
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Timothy P. Beck
                                           Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ST. PAUL REINSURANCE COMPANY

LIMITED LONDON,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.

and BEECHE SYSTEMS

CORPORATION,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C05-1912 BZ

ORDER DENYING

COUNTERDEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS AS MOOT AND SETTING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Counterclaimants having filed an amended answer and

counterclaim, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Counterdefendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED as

MOOT and the August 13, 2008 hearing on that motion is

VACATED. 

2. Counterdefendants shall respond to the amended

counterclaim, by no later than August 15, 2008.

3. If they move to dismiss, any opposition shall be

filed by August 22, 2008; any reply shall be filed by August

27, 2008, and the motion will be heard on September 3, 2008,

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 128 Filed 08/04/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

g:\bzall\-bzcases\st.paul reinsurance\order denying motion to dismiss as moot 2

at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal Building,

450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102.

Dated: August 4, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 128 Filed 08/04/08 Page 2 of 2
Michael Bruce JOHNSON v. STATE

CR-15-1160

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2017058EN.01000101.xml

| 23.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/1

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 21 February 2017

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (eighth EDF) for the financial year 2015

(2017/C 58/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the fourth ACP-EEC Convention, signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989 (1) and amended by the Agreement signed in Mauritius on 4 November 1995 (2),

1

2

Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the financing and administration of the Community aid under the Second Financial Protocol to the fourth ACP-EC Convention (3) (the ‘Internal Agreement’) setting up, amongst others, the eighth European Development Fund (eighth EDF), and in particular Article 33(3) thereof,

3

Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 16 June 1998 applicable to development finance cooperation under the fourth ACP-EC Convention (4), and in particular Articles 66 to 74 thereof,

4

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the eighth EDF as at 31 December 2015 and the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2015, together with the Commission’s replies (5) contained in that Annual Report,

5

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.

| (2) | The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the eighth EDF during the financial year 2015 has been satisfactory, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the eighth EDF during the financial year 2015 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the eighth EDF for the financial year 2015.

Done at Brussels, 21 February 2017.

For the Council

The President

E. SCICLUNA

---

(1)  OJ L 229, 17.8.1991, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 3.

2

(3)  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 108.

3

(4)  OJ L 191, 7.7.1998, p. 53.

4

(5)  OJ C 375, 13.10.2016, p. 287.

5

---
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S
Security Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 9, 2007



/s/ Ronald G. FarrellRonald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
George L. CARDET and Lilia M. Cardet, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-33

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.