alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Alliance Recovery Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Vaisler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Alliance Recovery Corp. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: August 11, 2006

 

**ALLIANCE RECOVERY CORP.**

 

By: */s/ Peter Vaisler*

Peter Vaisler

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert N. Tenczar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MMI Products, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.



|Date:   April 1, 2005 | By:  /s/Robert N. Tenczar                                    
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Robert N. Tenczar, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, David Oman, certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elite Artz, Inc.;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ David Oman Date: August 8, 2006         ___________________________________________ David Oman, Chief Financial Officer
Welcome
Science of Visual Analysis

Jerry Valerio

Datavangelist

Tableau
Jerry Valerio

Senior Manager, Sales Consulting

gvalerio@tableau.com

Gerard is a data engineer, data evangelist, and data strategist 

with customer advisory experience working for Tableau, and 

previously Vertica and Informatica and management consulting 

experience previously working for Accenture and 

PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Jerry Valerio

§ Foodie since girth and it shows!

 Side hustles as adjunct 

professor and data science 

bootcamp instructor.

 Sky-dived (tandem) and also 

zip-lined once because YOLO!
Audience

 Basic knowledge of statistics

 New to Tableau
Why Visual Analysis? Example I
Anscombe's Quartet

I II III IV

x y x y x y x y

10 8.04 10 9.14 10 7.46 8 6.58

8 6.95 8 8.14 8 6.77 8 5.76

13 7.58 13 8.74 13 12.74 8 7.71

9 8.81 9 8.77 9 7.11 8 8.84

11 8.33 11 9.26 11 7.81 8 8.47

14 9.96 14 8.1 14 8.84 8 7.04

6 7.24 6 6.13 6 6.08 8 5.25

4 4.26 4 3.1 4 5.39 19 12.5

12 10.84 12 9.13 12 8.15 8 5.56

7 4.82 7 7.26 7 6.42 8 7.91

5 5.68 5 4.74 5 5.73 8 6.89

Let's analyze some data ...
Anscombe's Quartet

Let's summarize the data ...

Property Value

Mean of x in each case 9 (exact)

Variance of x in each case 11 (exact)

Mean of y in each case 7.50 (to 2 decimal places)

Variance of y in each case 4.122 or 4.127 (to 3 decimal places)

Correlation between x and y in each 

case

0.816 (to 3 decimal places)

Linear regression line in each case y = 3.00 + 0.500x (to 2 and 3 decimal 

places, respectively)
Anscombe's Quartet

Let's visualize the data ...
Why Visual Analysis? Example II


Why?

Pre-attentive Processing
Pre-attentive Visual Attributes
Proximity Similarity Enclosure Size Shape Motion

Closure Continuity Connection Color 

(Hue)

Color (Intensity)

Gestalt Laws of Grouping

Continuity
Writing and Numbers were late to the Party
• Attributes are universal* whereas Numbers are not

* with some cultural differences
What is Visual Analysis?
さVisual analysis is the representation and 

presentation of data that exploits our visual 

perception abilities in order to amplify 

cognition.ざ

- Andy Kirk, author of “Data Visualization: a successful design process”
Thank You

Jerry Valerio

gvalerio@tableau.com
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Eagle Resources Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kelly Dodge, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 20, 2010





Kelly Dodge





/s/ Kelly Dodge


(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and


Principal Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDRE JUSTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

AIMLEE AMARIAH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00041-SI 

JUDGMENT

This action is dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff filing a new action in the proper 

venue.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated: February 16, 2017

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00041-SI Document 14 Filed 02/16/17 Page 1 of 1
Rural Tremaine SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2730

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Rodney Lyshaun STEELE, Sr.

CR-17-0170

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ADAPTREND, INC., 

Appellant

v.

NARITA EXPORT LLC, 

Appellee

______________________

2023-1195

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

92074784.

______________________

O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by 

Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the 

rules, it is 

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same 

hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

Case: 23-1195 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 03/29/2023
2 ADAPTREND, INC. V. NARITA EXPORT LLC

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

March 29, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 29, 2023

Case: 23-1195 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 03/29/2023
First Amendment effective as of March 28, 2007



 Exhibit 10.4 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 AGREEMENT OF L. KEVIN KELLY 
 WHEREAS, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (the “Company”) and L. Kevin Kelly are parties to a letter agreement dated
March 28, 2007 regarding the terms of Mr. Kelly’s employment with the Company (the “Agreement”), and the parties now desire to amend the Agreement to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A and the guidance and
regulations thereunder, to the extent applicable. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows, effective as of March 28, 2007: 
  

	 	1.	By amending Section 9(d)(ii) to add the following sentence to the end thereof: 

 Any payments made by the Company pursuant to this Section 9(d)(ii) shall be paid within 30 days after the determination that the excise tax liability exists. 
  

	 	2.	By amending Section 9 to add a new Section 9(m) to read as follows: 

  

	 	(m)	The payment of Accrued Obligations as described in Sections 9(b)(i), 9(c)(i)(A) and 9(d)(I) shall be made as soon as reasonably practicable after your date of termination, but in no
event later than 30 days following your termination. The cash payments based on Annual Cash Compensation described in Sections 9(c)(i)(B) and 9(d)(i)(II) shall be made as soon as practicable after expiration of the revocation period for the release
described in Section 9(l) but in no event later than 30 days following such expiration date. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement. 
  

			
	HEIDRICK & STRUGGLES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	  

	 Its:
	 	  

	 Date:
	 	  

	
	 L. KEVIN KELLY

	
	  

	 Date:
# m8564.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22.8.2017 C(2017) 5866 final PUBLIC VERSION To the notifying parties Subject : Case M.8564 - VIACOM INTERNATIONAL MEDIA NETWORKS ITALIA / DE AGOSTINI EDITORE / DEA BROADCAST JV Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 28 July 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which which the undertakings Viacom International Media Networks Italia S.r.l . (belonging to the Viacom group, "VIMNI", United States of America) and De Agostini Editore S.p.A. (belonging to the De Agostini group, " DeA Editore ", Italy) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking DeA Broadcast S.r.l . ("JV", Italy), a newly created company constituting a joint venture, by way of purchase of shares. 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for VIMNI: part of Viacom group, active in the development of television programs, motion pictures, short-form content, applications, games, consumer products, social media experiences and other entertainment content; - for DeA Editore : part of DeAgostini group, active in publishing, media and communications, gaming, and financial investment services ; - for the JV: development of a thematic channel and its related website . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( a ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission ( S igned)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 253 , 4.08. 2017 , p. 12 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE QUALCOMM'S REVISED MOTION TO SEAL ITS PROPOSED 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE QUALCOMM'S REVISED 

MOTION TO SEAL ITS PROPOSED 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Re: Dkt. No. 1310

Applying the compelling reasons, the Court DENIES without prejudice Qualcomm’s 

revised motion to seal its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, ECF No. 1310. 

Qualcomm’s motion is overly broad because it seeks to seal information that has been disclosed 

publicly at trial. For example, third party witnesses have testified publicly as to aspects of their 

agreements with Qualcomm; yet, Qualcomm seeks to seal even the existence of the agreements. 

Qualcomm shall file a more narrowly tailored motion to seal its proposed findings of fact and 

conclusions of law by February 8, 2019. Qualcomm’s motion to seal shall not seek to seal any 

information that is disclosed during the trial. Moreover, Qualcomm must work with third parties in 

advance of filing its motion, and the third party declarations must accompany Qualcomm’s 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1320 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE QUALCOMM'S REVISED MOTION TO SEAL ITS PROPOSED 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 15, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1320 Filed 01/15/19 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty L.P. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2008**(the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|           |   |   |
|----------------|--------|--------|
| March 10, 2009 |   |   | /s/ Joseph Macnow |
|           |   | Name:  | Joseph Macnow |
|           |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer of Vornado Realty Trust, sole general partner of Vornado Realty L.P. |
|                |        |        |  |  |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

INSIGHT GLOBAL, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEACON HILL STAFFING GROUP, LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00309-BLF 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S NONDISPOSITIVE PRE-TRIAL ORDER

[Re: ECF 47]

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Order 

of Magistrate Judge (ECF 46). ECF 47. A magistrate judge’s non-dispositive pre-trial order may 

be modified or set aside if it is “clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). 

“[T]he magistrate’s factual determinations are reviewed for clear error, and the magistrate’s legal 

conclusions are reviewed to determine whether they are contrary to law.” Perry v. 

Schwarzenegger, 268 F.R.D. 344, 348 (N.D. Cal. 2010). 

Having reviewed Defendant’s motion and the magistrate judge’s pre-trial order (ECF 46), 

the Court finds no “clear error” in the magistrate judge’s factual determinations and does not find 

that the magistrate judge’s legal conclusions are “contrary to law.” See Perry, 268 F.R.D. at 348. 

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion at ECF 47 is hereby DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 9, 2019

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge