alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Northern District of California

THOMAS McMAHON,

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED

c/o registered agent CSC - Lawyers Incorporating Service

2710 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150N

Sacramento, CA 95833

Jeff D. Friedman (173886)

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202, Berkeley, CA 94710

Telephone: (510) 725-300; Facsimile: (510) 725-3001

jefff@hbsslaw.com

Case 5:17-cv-00372-HRL Document 2 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 2

5:17-cv-00372 HRL January 25, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan Y. Soong Case 5:17-cv-00372-HRL Document 5 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 5:17-cv-00372-HRL Document 2 Filed 01/24/17 Page 2 of 2

5:17-cv-00372 HRL

Case 5:17-cv-00372-HRL Document 5 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 2
| 1. | The Bank is Trustee under the Trust Agreement. |
|----|------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | A review of the Trustee’s activities during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2011 and of its performance under the Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Laura Cawley                                      |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Laura Cawley                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Title: | Vice President                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

----

----
Harvey JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-288

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

Harvey Jackson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Jackson v. State*, 175 So.3d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).
Exhibit 10.65



 Exhibit 10.65 
 Rochester HI&S 
 ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT (the “Assignment”) is made effective as of this
14th day of November, 2008, by and between APPLE EIGHT HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIPS, INC., a Virginia corporation (“Apple Eight”),
APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation (“Apple Nine”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. Viking Fund Rochester (MN), LLC (“Seller”) and Apple Eight entered into that certain purchase contract dated as of January 25, 2008, as
amended by First Amendment to Purchase Contract dated as of February 19, 2008 and amended by Second Amendment to Purchase Contract dated as of May 1, 2008 (collectively, the “Contract”) whereby Seller agreed to sell, and Apple
Eight agreed to purchase, certain real property located in Rochester, Minnesota, and more particularly described in the Contract. 
 B. Apple
Eight desires to assign its rights and obligations in and under the Contract to Apple Nine. 
 C. Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise
defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Contract. 
 WITNESSETH 
 FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid, other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Assignment. Apple Eight hereby assigns and conveys to Apple
Nine all of its rights, title and interests in, to and under the Contract. 
 2. Assumption. The Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to
perform all of the Assignor’s obligations under the Contract. 
 3. Earnest Money Deposit. Apple Nine shall reimburse Apple Eight
the amount of the Earnest Money Deposit together with all interest accrued thereon as of the date hereof. 
 4. Indemnification. Apple
Nine hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Apple Eight from and against any and all claims, losses or damages that may arise out of Apple Nine’s default under or breach of the Contract. 







 5. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts as may be convenient
or necessary, and it shall not be necessary that the signatures of all parties hereto or thereto be contained on any one counterpart hereof or thereof. Additionally, the parties hereto agree that for purposes of facilitating the execution of this
Agreement, the signature pages taken from the separate individually executed counterparts of this Agreement may be combined to form multiple fully executed counterparts. All executed counterparts of this Agreement shall be deemed to be originals,
but all of such counterparts taken together or collectively, as the case may be, shall constitute one and the same agreement. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day first above written. 
  

			
	APPLE EIGHT:
	
	APPLE EIGHT HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David P. Buckley

	Name:	 	David P. Buckley
	Title:	 	Vice-President
	
	APPLE NINE:
	
	APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Justin G. Knight

	Name:	 	Justin G. Knight
	Title:	 	President
Gerald R. WHITE, et ux. v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT, et al.

NO. 2019-C-0572

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied.
Keith SARJEANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-314

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 20 / Friday, January 31, 2025 / Presidential Documents 8751 

Executive Order 14182 of January 24, 2025 

Enforcing the Hyde Amendment 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: 

Section 1. Purpose and Policy. For nearly five decades, the Congress has 

annually enacted the Hyde Amendment and similar laws that prevent Federal 

funding of elective abortion, reflecting a longstanding consensus that American taxpayers should not be forced to pay for that practice. However, 

the previous administration disregarded this established, commonsense policy by embedding forced taxpayer funding of elective abortions in a wide 

variety of Federal programs. 

It is the policy of the United States, consistent with the Hyde Amendment, 

to end the forced use of Federal taxpayer dollars to fund or promote elective 

abortion. 

Sec. 2. Revocation of Orders and Actions. The following Executive Orders 

are hereby revoked: 

(a) Executive Order 14076 of July 8, 2022; and 

(b) Executive Order 14079 of August 3, 2022. 

Sec. 3. Implementation. The Director of the Office of Management and 

Budget shall promulgate guidance to the heads of executive departments 

and agencies related to implementation of sections 1 and 2 of this order. 

Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed 

to impair or otherwise affect: 

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, 

or the head thereof; or 

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. 

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and 

subject to the availability of appropriations. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-E11
8752 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 20 / Friday, January 31, 2025 / Presidential Documents 

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party 

against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, 

employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

January 24, 2025. 

[FR Doc. 2025–02175 

Filed 1–30–25; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-E11Trump.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.1


                               Certification


     The undersigned certifies for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code, in his capacity as the chief
executive officer of IRON STAR DEVELOPMENT, INC., ("IRON STAR") that to his
knowledge, the Form 10-QSB of IRON STAR with financial statements for the
period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operation of IR0N STAR.


Date: November 15, 2004

By: /s/ Wallace Boyack
     Wallace Boyack
     Chief Executive Officer
Russell JOHNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4632

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 2, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Allonge No. 2 to Promissory Note between the Company and JH Realty LLC



 Exhibit 10.33 
 ALLONGE NO. 2 TO 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
 TO JH REALTY, LLC 
 This Allonge No. 2 to Promissory Note (the
“Allonge No. 2”), dated as of December 31, 2008, is attached to and forms a part of the Promissory Note dated December 31, 2007 (the “Note”) and the Allonge to Promissory Note dated March 31,
2008, made by SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of J H Realty, an Arizona limited liability company (the “Holder”), in the original principal amount of $62,000.

  

	 	1.	The Note is hereby amended to provide that it is due and payable in full on June 30, 2009. 

  

	 	2.	In all other respects, the Note and the Allonge are confirmed, ratified, and approved and, as amended by this Allonge No. 2, shall continue in full force and effect.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have caused this Allonge No. 2 to Promissory Note to be executed and
delivered by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date and year first above written. 
  

			
	SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael Kirksey
	Its:	 	 Michael Kirksey
 Executive Vice President and
COO



  
  

			
	 Accepted and agreed to:
  
 JH REALTY, LLC

		
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph Hines
	Its:	 	 Joseph Hines
 President
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 30th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EQUIP. TO BE 

ADMITTED FOR TRIAL

C 05-01938 WHA 

19796\923246.1

Gerald Sobel 

Benjamin Hsing (Pro Hac Vice)

Jeffrey Horowitz (Pro Hac Vice)

KAYE SCHOLER LLP 

425 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10022-3598 

Telephone: (212) 836-8000 

Facsimile: (212) 836-8686 

Mark D. Petersen (State Bar No. 111956) 

Lucas Huizar (State Bar No. 227111) 

Nan E. Joesten (State Bar No. 191288) 

FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 30th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 954-4400 

Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CHIRON CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHIRON CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SOURCECF, INC.; SOURCECF 

CLINICAL RESEARCH & 

DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.; MAXOR 

NATIONAL PHARMACY SERVICES 

CORPORATION d/b/a IV SOLUTIONS; 

FOUNDATION CARE L.L.C.; and 

PHARMACEUTICAL SPECIALTIES, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. C 05-01938 WHA 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER REGARDING AUDIO-VISUAL 

AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND VISUAL 

AIDS TO BE ADMITTED FOR TRIAL 

Trial Date: April 17, 2006 

Time: 7:30 a.m. 

Courtroom: 9, 19th floor 

Honorable William H. Alsup 

The following equipment will be allowed in the Courtroom for the purposes of trial in the 

above matter: 

1. Laptop Computers; 

2. An electronic projector(s) and projection screen; 

Case 3:05-cv-01938-WHA Document 107 Filed 04/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Case 3:05-cv-01938-WHA Document 108 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 2
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 

235 Montgomery Street, 30th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

(415) 954-4400 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EQUIP. TO BE 

ADMITTED FOR TRIAL

C 05-01938 WHA 

- 2 - 19796\923246.1

3. Video Monitors; 

4. Switch Boxes; and 

5. Cabling. 

Concurrence in filing this document was obtained from Richard P. Doyle in 

compliance with General Order No. 45, Section X. 

STIPULATED TO: 

DATED: April 10, 2006 FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 

By: /s/ 

Lucas W. Huizar 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

CHIRON CORPORATION 

DATED: April 10, 2006 JANSSEN DOYLE LLP 

By: /s/ 

Richard P. Doyle 

Attorneys for Defendants 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April __, 2006 

 

Hon. William H. Alsup 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-01938-WHA Document 107 Filed 04/10/2006 Page 2 of 2


11

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:05-cv-01938-WHA Document 108 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 5

REDACTED VERSION OF

DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED

Case 3:17-cv-00359-WHA Document 25-5 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 1
EX PARTE Roger Allen CALHOUN

1170059 (CR-16-0915)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 25 (Friday, February 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02328]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-102328; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2024-63]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American, LLC; Notice of 
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Waive the Options Regulatory 
Fee (ORF) for December 2024

February 3, 2025.
    On November 25, 2024, NYSE American, LLC (the ``Exchange'' or 
``NYSE American'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2024-63) to amend its 
Options Fee Schedule regarding the Options Regulatory Fee (``ORF'').\3\ 
The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with the 
Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\4\ The proposed 
rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on 
December 16, 2024.\5\ On January 24, 2025, pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission temporarily suspended the 
proposed rule change and instituted proceedings under Section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act to determine whether to approve or disapprove 
the proposed rule change.\6\ On January 27, 2025, the Exchange withdrew 
the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEAMER-2024-63).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 101866 (Dec. 10, 
2024), 89 FR 101674 (Dec. 16, 2024) (``Notice'').
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \5\ See Notice, supra note 3.
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 102277, 90 FR 8546 
(Jan. 30, 2025).
    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-02328 Filed 2-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Kenwand Jurmaine THOMPSON, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1765

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE STATE

(In re: State v. Keith Duane Bumpers)

CR-17-0404

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          24,652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  432,372<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,455<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                     32,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               493,796
<PP&E>                                       1,853,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 743,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,982,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          388,054
<BONDS>                                        746,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,038
<OTHER-SE>                                     630,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,982,880
<SALES>                                      2,546,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,551,007
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,354,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               337,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (213,726)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (79,079)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (134,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (134,647)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.31)
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES $9,262 OF LONG-TERM NOTES RECEIVABLE.
<F2>EXCLUDES $5,604 OF ALLOWANCE FOR LONG-TERM NOTES RECEIVABLE.
<F3>INCLUDED IN TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES LINE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 12****COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**     The following table sets forth the computation of consolidated ratios of earnings to fixedcharges for TD Banknorth Inc. for the periods shown.                   Successor Successor Successor Combined (1)  Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Year Ended Year Ended  March 31, 2007 March 31, 2006 December 31, 2006 December 31, 2005**Earnings:**                Earnings before income taxes and change in accounting principle $81,874  $116,347  $497,985  $416,407 Fixed charges excluding interest on deposits  44,589   70,143   221,858   182,118      Earnings including fixed charges but excluding interest on deposits  126,463   186,490   719,843   598,525 Interest on deposits  177,738   106,682   562,019   228,596      Earnings including fixed charges and interest on deposits $304,201  $293,172  $1,281,862  $827,121                       **Fixed Charges:**                Interest expense, excluding interest on deposits $41,084  $67,373  $209,387  $174,293 Interest within rent expense (1/3 rent expense)  3,505   2,770   12,471   7,825      Fixed charges excluding interest on deposits  44,589   70,143   221,858   182,118 Interest on deposits  177,738   106,682   562,019   228,596      Fixed charges including interest on deposits $222,327  $176,825  $783,877  $410,714                       **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:**                Including interest expense on deposits  1.37x  1.66x  1.64x  2.01xExcluding interest expense on deposits  2.79x  2.66x  3.24x  3.29x (1) Information for the year ended December 31,2005 is based on the combined operations of TDBanknorth’s predecessor, Banknorth Group, Inc. for the period January 1, 2005 to February 28, 2005and the operations of TD Banknorth as successor for the period March 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005following TD Banknorth’s application of the purchase method of accounting to account for thetransaction which resulted in TD Banknorth becoming a majority-owned subsidiary of TheToronto-Dominion Bank.