alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40267

Summary Calendar

__________________

ODAN BEN BOWMAN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division, ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:92-CV-334

- - - - - - - - - -

February 8, 1996

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas prisoner Odan Ben Bowman appeals the dismissal of his

civil rights action against several prison employees. Bowman

contends that the district court erred by denying his proposed

witness lists; holding him to the standards applicable to

attorneys; dismissing his claims against defendants Jackson,

Arnold and Hall for failing to serve them; denying his motion for
No. 95-40267

-2-

appointment of counsel; dismissing his claims surrounding the use

of force by defendant Fortner, the medical care he received

following that use of force, and his claims that guards forced

him to shave and that defendant Green punished him despite a

clipper-shave pass Bowman believed permitted him to avoid

shaving; and by imposing a $60 partial filing fee on him. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and we find no reversible error. We therefore affirm for

essentially the reasons given by the district court.

AFFIRMED.
# L_2017099EN.01001801.xml

| 12.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 99/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 99/18

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/687

of 30 March 2017

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [London Cure Smoked Salmon (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘London Cure Smoked Salmon’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘London Cure Smoked Salmon’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘London Cure Smoked Salmon’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘London Cure Smoked Salmon’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘London Cure Smoked Salmon’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. — Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 474, 17.12.2016, p. 11.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Micahel PREVATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4237

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 2019 Rehearing Denied July 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2 (c)
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
    Amendment Eligible Accounts
  Conditions to Effectiveness




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties
    Scope
 Reaffirmation and Confirmation
 Counterparts
 Expenses
 -2-




---



##### 



BORROWERS:NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANYBy
    
    /s/ Gary LaChey

Gary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerDEETER FOUNDRY, INC.By
    
    /s/ Gary LaCheyGary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerMERCER FORGE CORPORATIONBy
    
    /s/ Gary LaCheyGary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerDALTON CORPORATIONBy
    
    /s/ Gary LaCheyGary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerDALTON CORPORATION,
STRYKER MACHINING FACILITY CO.By
    
    /s/ Gary LaCheyGary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



DALTON CORPORATION, WARSAW MANUFACTURING FACILITYBy
    
    /s/ Gary LaChey

Gary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerADVANCED CAST PRODUCTS, INC.By
    
    /s/ Gary LaCheyGary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerGREGG INDUSTRIES, INC.By
    
    /s/ Gary LaCheyGary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerA & M SPECIALTIES, INC.By
    
    /s/ Gary LaCheyGary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerNEENAH TRANSPORT, INC.By
    
    /s/ Gary LaCheyGary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



DALTON CORPORATION, KENDALLVILLE MANUFACTURING FACILITYBy
    
    /s/ Gary LaChey

Gary LaCheyIts
    
    Corporate Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerBANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor to FLEET
CAPITAL CORPORATION, as Agent and as a LenderBy
    
    /s/ Robert LundIts
    
    Senior Vice PresidentWACHOVIA CAPITAL FINANCECORPORATION (CENTRAL), f/k/a CONGRESSFINANCIAL CORPORATION (CENTRAL),as Syndication Agent and as a LenderBy
    
    /s/ Laura WheelandIts
    
    Vice PresidentGENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITALCORPORATION, as Documentation Agent and as a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ Bond HarbertsBond HarbertsIts:
    
    Duly Authorized SignatoryTHE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., as a LenderBy
    
    /s/ Eustachio BrunoEustachio BrunoIts
    
    Assistant Vice President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FITBIT, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

P-COVE ENTERPRISES, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC (KAW)

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE OVERSIZED JOINT

DISCOVERY LETTER

Re: Dkt. No. 221

On April 24, 2018, the parties filed a joint letter requesting that the undersigned permit 

them to file a joint discovery letter of no more than 10 pages, and no more than twenty-four pages 

of attachments. (Dkt. No. 221 at 1.) Since the underlying legal issue is the same—namely whether 

the BCS Defendants are separate and distinct parties for the purposes of discovery—the request is 

GRANTED. The parties are instructed to follow the back-and-forth format outlined in the 

undersigned’s standing order to ensure that they are addressing the same issues, and they shall 

furnish a chambers copy that includes tabs for all attachments.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2018

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                Historical Status of OTC Rulemakings

Historical Status of OTC Rulemakings Home
          Drugs
          Development & Approval Process | Drugs
          How Drugs are Developed and Approved
          Over-the-Counter OTC | Nonprescription Drugs
          Historical Status of OTC Rulemakings
          Rulemaking History for OTC Insect Bite Drug ProductsHistorical Status of OTC Rulemakings Rulemaking History for OTC Insect Bite Drug Products
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintOTC Insect Bite Drug Product information can be found on the following pages:
External Analgesic
    Skin Protectant

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      12/05/2016Historical Status of OTC Rulemakings
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Defendants’ Notice of Appeal 

No. 3:17-cv-00485-WHO 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CHAD A. READLER 

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

BRIAN STRETCH 

United States Attorney 

JOHN R. TYLER 

Assistant Director 

W. SCOTT SIMPSON (Va. Bar #27487) 

Senior Trial Counsel 

Department of Justice, Room 7210 

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 

Post Office Box 883 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

Telephone: (202) 514-3495 

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470 

E-mail: scott.simpson@usdoj.gov 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS 

DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the 

United States; UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA; ELAINE C. DUKE, Acting 

Secretary of Homeland Security; 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, 

Attorney General of the United States 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 No. 3:17-cv-00485-WHO 

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the defendants hereby appeal to the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from this Court’s Order of April 25, 2017 (Docket No. 82), granting 

plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, and from this Court’s Order of July 20, 2017 

(Docket No. 146), denying defendants’ motion for reconsideration of the Order of April 25, 2017. 

Dated: September 18, 2017 

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 168 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 2
Defendants’ Notice of Appeal

No. 5:17-cv-00485-WHO

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 CHAD A. READLER 

 Acting Assistant Attorney General 

 BRIAN STRETCH 

 United States Attorney 

 JOHN R. TYLER 

 Assistant Director 

 /s/ W. Scott Simpson 

 

 W. SCOTT SIMPSON (Va. Bar #27487) 

 Senior Trial Counsel 

 Attorneys, Department of Justice 

 Civil Division, Room 7210 

 Federal Programs Branch 

 Post Office Box 883 

 Washington, D.C. 20044 

 Telephone: (202) 514-3495 

 Facsimile: (202) 616-8470 

 E-mail: scott.simpson@usdoj.gov 

 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS 

Case 3:17-cv-00485-WHO Document 168 Filed 09/18/17 Page 2 of 2
EX-33.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015 - 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of
and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services,
excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the
Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Shari Gillund
Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 29, 2008
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

Power of Attorney of Stephen G. Franklin, Sr.

STATE OF GEORGIA

COUNTY OF FULTON


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Stephen G. Franklin, Sr., a Director of
EDUTREK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia corporation, do constitute and appoint
Steve Bostic and Daniel D. Moore, jointly and severally, my true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
me in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for EDUTREK
INTERNATIONAL, INC. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
incorporating such changes as any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems
appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-
fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 9th day of
March 1999.



                             /s/ Stephen G. Franklin, Sr.
                             ------------------------------
                             Stephen G. Franklin, Sr.



                                ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                --------------

BEFORE me this 9th day of March 1999, came Stephen G. Franklin, Sr., personally
known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power
of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                             /s/ Dee Ann Stone
                             ------------------
                             NOTARY PUBLIC


                             State of Georgia
                                      -------

                             My Commission Expires:

                             February 1, 2003
                             ----------------
T.W.B. v. STATE

CR-16-0893

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, W. Bradley Blair, II, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GTA-IB, LLC;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| August 21, 2006 |  /s/ W. Bradley Blair, II           |   |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|            |  W. Bradley Blair, II               |
|            | * President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Jinelle GRILLE, Appellant, v. AIR 1 MECHANICAL, CORP. and Joanne Monzon, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-301

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Norvall SCOTT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1981

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00293-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SHEILA MCCRORY,

Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00293-EJD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

SETTLEMENT

The parties, having filed a Notice of Settlement (Dkt. No. 21), are ordered to appear before 

the Honorable Edward J. Davila on June 15, 2017, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom No. 4, 5th Floor, 

United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause 

why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). On or 

before June 8, 2017, the parties shall file a joint statement in response to the Order to Show Cause 

setting forth the status of settlement efforts as well as the amount of additional time necessary to 

finalize and file a dismissal.

The Order to Show Cause shall be automatically vacated and the parties relieved of the 

obligation to file a joint statement if a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a) is filed on or before June 8, 2017.

All other pretrial deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED and any pending motions are 

TERMINATED.

Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss 

the action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 12, 2017

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge