alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:05-cv-01708-M Document 24 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 233
Case 3:05-cv-01708-M Document 24 Filed 07/11/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 234
Case 3:05-cv-01708-M Document 24 Filed 07/11/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 235
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 2159

MUHAMMAD W.K. ABDUL QADIR
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
LATRELL S. WILSON; DONALD MARTIN; SERGEANT ROY DRAKE; CHERAW CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; INSURANCE ADJUSTER RODNEY SPAIN; PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE; UNKNOWN FEDERAL US POSTAL EMPLOYEES; ATTORNEY DAVID H. MAYBANK; ATTORNEY BRADLEY L. LANFORD; MICHAEL T. COULTER; ATTORNEY RAYMOND D. TURNER; ANDERSON USED AUTO PARTS, all

- state, unknown owner; CREDIT COL LECTION SERVICES COMMERCIAL; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; JUDGE ROGER HENDERSON; ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General; UNKNOWN PROCESSORS, All of the above Defendants acting individual capacity as well as co

- conspirator of the consp iracy
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten
, Chief District Judge. ( 4:17

- cv

- 02193

- TLW )

Submitted : January 22, 2019 Decided: January 24, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Muhammad W.K. Abdul Qadir, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Muhammad W.K. Abdul Qadir seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint without prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012)

. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutor y
and remand for further proceedings

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Cor p. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949).

Because the order Qadir seeks to appeal does not “ clearly preclude amendment ,” Qadir

may be able to remedy certain deficiencies identified by the district court by filing an

amended complaint. Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal order is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal
Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 8 07 F.3d 619, 6 23

- 24 (4th Cir. 2015) ; Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar

Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993).

W e therefore dismiss th is appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Goode , 807 F.3d at 630.

In Goode , we remanded to the district cour t with instructions to allow amendment of the
complaint. Id. Here, however, Qadir previously, albeit unsuccessfully, attempted to
amend his complaint. Accordingly, we direct on remand that the district court, in its

discretion, either afford Qadir anoth er opportunity to file an amended complaint or
dismiss the complaint with prejudice, thereby rendering the dismissal order a final,
appealable order

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal4 contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
**Exhibit 24.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-118983, 333-44462, 333-44756,333-60138 and 333-60136) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1995 Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Option Plan, 2000 CEO Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, 2001UK Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the UK company Share Option Plan of Pharsight Corporation of our report dated May 5, 2006 (except for Note 14, as to which the date is June 12, 2006), with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Pharsight Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2006. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

June 23, 2006
|Exhibit
  32.2
|--------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Asia Electrical Power International Group Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Xiaoling Chen, Chief Accounting Officer Secretary of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
    The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.






|/s/ Xiaoling
      ChenXiaoling ChenChief Accounting Officer and
      SecretaryDated: November 14,
      2006
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING ZTE (USA) INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING ZTE (USA) INC.'S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1405

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on ZTE’s motion to seal as 

follows. None of the documents ZTE seeks to seal have internal pagination. ZTE’s motion appears 

to follow the convention that the first page of each document is page 1. Therefore, the Court 

follows ZTE’s convention.

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX9148 Page 4 GRANTED.

QX9148 Page 6 GRANTED.

QX9166 Page 3 GRANTED.

QX9166 Page 4 GRANTED.

QX9180 Page 3 GRANTED.

QX9180 Page 5 GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1415 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 1
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 306 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 

Jennifer Grappell v. Alberto M. Carvalho, et al. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel 

in the case of Jennifer Grappell v. Alberto M. Carvalho, 

et al. 

Whereas, Senator Marco Rubio has been named as a defendant in the case of Jennifer Grappell v. Alberto M. 

Carvalho, et al., Case No. 21–cv–22016, currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Florida; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions relating to 

their official responsibilities: Now therefore, be it 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 306 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent Senator Rubio in the case of Jennifer 

3 Grappell v. Alberto M. Carvalho, et al. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/27/2015 8:45:19 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
EXHIBIT
31.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, Roy O.
Estridge, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009, of Valley Commerce Bancorp;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the first fiscal quarter of 2009 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date: May
15, 2009





/s/ Roy O. EstridgeRoy
      O. EstridgeChief
      Financial Officer




32
LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM d/b/a Lee Memorial Hospital, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3975

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 2019

Joanne B. Erde and Donna Holshouser Stinson of Duane Morris LLP, Miami, for Appellant.

Tracy Cooper George of the Agency for Health Care Administration, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Lee Memorial Health System, challenges a final order issued by the Agency for Health Care Administration ("AHCA"), finding it was overpaid with Medicaid funds for services provided to undocumented aliens. As AHCA is barred from conducting a retrospective review of prior authorized claims pursuant to section 409.905(5)(a), Florida Statutes, the Final Order is reversed and no overpayment is owed by Appellant. *Lee Mem'l Health Sys. Gulf Coast Med. Ctr. v. State of Fla., Agency for Health Care Admin.* , 1D16-1969, 272 So.3d 431, 2019 WL 942995 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 27, 2019).

REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of an order consistent with this opinion

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Jay and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Opinion filed March 26, 2020

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-19-00187-CV

__________

JARED CHAVEZ, Appellant

V.

FLARE INDUSTRIES, LLC D/B/A AEREON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 238th District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV55597

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In 

the motion, the parties state that they “have resolved all issues pending between them 

regarding the subject matter of this appeal.” The parties request that we dismiss this 

appeal and tax costs against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. 

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

March 26, 2020 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating. 

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


                             TENTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                  STERLING CHEMICALS, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        SALARIED EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN

         WHEREAS, Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (the "Corporation") currently
maintains its Amended and Restated Salaried Employees' Pension Plan (as amended,
the "Existing Plan");

         WHEREAS, Section 15.1 reserves to the Corporation the right to amend
the Existing Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Existing Plan in order to
meet the requirements of the IRS for a determination letter;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         Section 1. Amendment of Section 2.1 of the Existing Plan. Effective May
1, 1996, Section 2.1 is amended to add the following sentence after the first
sentence of the third paragraph:

             "An employee's date of hire is the date on which he first performs
             an Hour of Service."

         Section 2. Amendment of Section 2.2 of the Existing Plan. Effective May
1, 1996, the first paragraph of Section 2.2 is amended to read as follows:

             "A participant shall be fully vested and have a Vested Percentage
             of 100% in this Plan on his Normal Retirement Date or on any date
             as of which he has completed at least five years of Vesting Service
             with the Employers and the Subsidiaries as defined in Section
             17.1."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has executed this instrument this
______ day of ___________ , 2003.

                                            STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Wayne R. Parker
                                            Senior Vice President, Human
                                            Resources and Administration



                                       1
##### 



Exhibit 32
 
 Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and Chief
Executive Officer, and Corporate Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
Neenah Foundry Company (the Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ William M. BarrettWilliam M. BarrettPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Gary W. LaCheyGary W. LaCheyCorporate Vice President - Finance

and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Lau Hing Bun, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elite Artz, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer=s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer=s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer=s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer=s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer=s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer=s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: August 9, 2007 /s/ Lau Hing Bun Lau Hing Bun Principal Financial Officer
Order entered June 6, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01694
- CR FRANCISCO ALVAREZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09
- 73175
- P



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS court reporter Lisabeth Kellett’s June 4, 2013 request for extension of time to file the reporter’s record

. We ORDER Ms. Kellett, as official court reporter, to file the complete reporter’s record by JULY 3, 2013 . Because the record is already two months overdue, no further extensions will be granted.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Lisabeth Kellett, official court reporter, 203rd Judicial District Court, and t o counsel for all parties.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Nicolas V. Chater, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-S Security Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 14, 2009



/s/ Nicolas V. ChaterNicolas V. ChaterChief Financial Officer
David E. ZIPPERER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-0046

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christian BEILER, DOC #C08422, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.