alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 34 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 34

    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
  approving the Coronavirus Immunization of School Students and Early 
                Childhood Workers Amendment Act of 2021.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 19 (legislative day, January 18), 2022

  Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Lee, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
  approving the Coronavirus Immunization of School Students and Early 
                Childhood Workers Amendment Act of 2021.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The Coronavirus Immunization of School Students and Early Childhood 
Workers Amendment Act of 2021 (D.C. Act 24-285), enacted by the 
District of Columbia Council on January 12, 2022, and transmitted to 
Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home 
Rule Act on January 18, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE: John C. ALEXANDER

NO. 2019-B-0664

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he violated Rule 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that John C. Alexander, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26591, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
Matthew Paul MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3334

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018

Assets

Cash and Cash Equivalents 622,824,777 $                287,766,827 $               

Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 4,315,495,522                  4,436,617,626               

Accrued Interest Receivable 18,017,191                      17,259,151                     

Premium Receivable 166,102,813                   212,524,000                  

Other Receivables     ‐                                    

Prepaid Expenses ‐                                     ‐                                    

General Property, Equipment, and Software, Net 48,432                             59,582                            

Total Assets 5,122,488,735 $             4,954,227,186 $            

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses 468,285 $                        367,049 $                       

Farm Credit Insurance Fund

     Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 5,122,020,450                4,887,799,466               

Allocated Insurance Fund Balance ‐                                         66,060,671                     

Total Insurance Fund 5,122,020,450 $             4,953,860,137 $            

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund 5,122,488,735 $             4,954,227,186 $            

September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Comparative Statement of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)
Calendar Year to Date Calendar Year to Date

September 30, 2019 September 30, 2018

Income

Premiums 166,102,813 $                158,551,120 $               

Interest Income on Investments 71,023,717                      52,904,292                     

Total Income 237,126,530 $                211,455,412 $               

Expenses

Administrative Operating Expenses 2,905,546 $                     2,823,234 $                    

$                    2,823,234 2,905,546 $                   

Net Income 234,220,984 $                208,632,178 $               

Balance at September 1, 2019 $            4,953,860,137

Payment to AIRAs Accountholders (66,060,671)                   

Net Income 234,220,984                  

Balance at September 30, 2019 5,122,020,450 $            

(Unaudited)

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Comparative Statement of Revenue and Expense

Period Ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund

Period Ended September 30, 2019

(Unaudited)
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Carolyn M. MrozCarolyn M. MrozPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 15, 2007By:

/s/ Edmund T. LeonardEdmund T. LeonardChairman of the Board and Chief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2




        Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific
Northwest Productions Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Davinder
Bains, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.

                             PACIFIC NORTHWEST PRODUCTIONS INC.,
                             Registrant

Date:  August 13, 2005        /s/ Davinder Bains
                              ----------------------------------
                              By: Davinder Bains, Chief Financial
                                  Officer and Principal Accounting
                                  Officer
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

# **Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer ofVornado Realty L.P. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) for year ended December 31, 2015**(the “Report”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 

|           |   |   |
|----------------|--------|--------|
| April 11, 2016 |   |   | /s/ Steven  Roth |
|           |   | Name:  | Steven Roth |
|           |   | Title: | Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive Officer

of Vornado Realty Trust, sole  General Partner of

Vornado Realty L.P. |
<PAGE>

                            L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR RATIO DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>





                   PRO FORMA        COMPANY                             PREDECESSOR COMPANY
                                    -------                             -------------------
                     YEAR          FOR THE NINE    FOR THE THREE   YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,          FOR THE NINE   FOR THE THREE
                     ENDED         MONTHS ENDED     MONTHS ENDED                                     MONTHS ENDED   MONTHS ENDED
                  DECEMBER 31,     DECEMBER 31,       MARCH 31,                                      DECEMBER 31,     MARCH 31,
                     1997             1997             1997           1996       1995         1994       1993          1993
                  ------------     -------------   -------------    ---------   -------      ------- -------------  ------------
<S>               <C>              <C>             <C>              <C>         <C>          <C>     <C>            <C>
Earnings:
 Income before
  income taxes       $14,400           $27,402           ($505)      $19,494      $174        $2,929        $8,300        $5,100
 Add:
  Interest expense    43,800            29,884            8,441       24,197     4,475         5,450         4,100             -
  Interest
   component of
   rent expense        5,133             3,445              851         2,832     1,591        1,866         1,400           467
                 ------------     -------------    -------------    ---------   -------      ------- -------------  ------------
 Earnings             $63,333           $60,731           $8,787      $46,523    $6,240      $10,245       $13,800        $5,567
                 ============     =============    =============    =========   =======      ======= =============  ============
Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense   $43,800           $29,884           $8,441       $24,197    $4,475       $5,450        $4,100             -
  Interest
   component of
   rent expense        5,133             3,445              851         2,832     1,591        1,866         1,400           467
                 ------------     -------------    -------------    ---------   -------      ------- -------------  ------------
 Fixed Charges       $48,933           $33,329           $9,292       $27,029    $6,066       $7,316        $5,500          $467
                 ============     =============    =============    =========   =======      ======= =============  ============

Ratio of earnings
 to fixed charges         1.3x             1.8x          N/A     (a)      1.7x      1.0x         1.4x          2.5x        N/A   (b)
                 ============     =============    =============    =========   =======      ======= =============  ============
</TABLE>


(a) For the three months ended March 31, 1997, earnings were insufficient to
    cover fixed charges by $0.5 million.
(b) For the three months ended March 31, 1993, no interest expense was
    incurred.
German E. DELATORRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2379

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 10, 2019

German Delatorre, Raiford, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN C. ETTER, individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00184 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

A prior order dated February 28 stayed plaintiff’s motion to quash (Dkt. No. 98) pending

plaintiff’s production of call records, which production should have been completed by March

12 (Dkt. No. 114). Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing by MARCH 30 AT NOON

why the motion to quash should not be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2018. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.1


                              SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The Registrant has the following subsidiaries:

       First International Bank, a Connecticut state bank and trust company


First International Bank has the following subsidiaries:

       FNBNE SBA Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
       FNBNE Business Loans Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
       FNBNE Funding Corp., a Delaware corporation
       FIB Business Loans Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
       FIB Funding Corp., a Delaware corporation
       FIB Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
       First International Capital Corp. of New Jersey, a New Jersey corporation
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Elizabeth Plaza, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, and Manuel O. Morera, Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Elizabeth Plaza
            /s/
                Manuel O. MoreraElizabeth
                Plaza
            Manuel
                O. MoreraChief
                Executive Officer
            Chief
                Financial Officer





September
      14, 2006





33
### xonoublo

FlWWU’8 P. 0.B6x AUSTXX, TEXAS

B. mpe sattelflelb Pee'" CoE8tuloner

### Him.8. Beyna 8atterfXeld 

### - Page 

### 2xnwbershaU-f&elt85* ,Pi&t to partlU%gMte la sny of the **b0nbtltS** from sati FLr%wbncs Relief8Ilj

Retlrewat'Fund. If any 8uah amber shellele&w3ttopmtW5pste lamwahFuncl, he ahellnot bet

lleblefast

any rule= de&mtion nor to py ea harmin pso$lded.' **St ls**  **qn?fme& frau**  **8 readbig**  **of tht~**  aaction of the Aat that pmtlul.pmnta who deatx-4

ehell~e . . authoriw ~aldoltyartownorthegowrn.irrgbal~ themof to dedwt not lur then ow psr ceutw aor more **tlum** three (3) **qer** aentw . . . from hl8 roleq or a-- paaetton . . .

Xne.$eotiag 

### to **pnrtlalpete In**  **the** Vlrewn*e

ttQa*hel'lberrdb.
#### Mustafa Ibraheem AL-NAJJAR; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-70985.

Agency Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 2004.*

Decided May 13, 2004.

Amos Lawrence, Attorney at Law, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Ethan B. Kanter, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILER,** and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

Substantial evidence supports the Immigration Judge’s determination that Al-Najjar demonstrated neither past persecution nor a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. *INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502*U.S. *478, 481,*112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); *see also Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003); *Khourassany v. INS,*208 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir.2000); *Mendez-Efrain v. INS,*813 F.2d 279, 283 (9th Cir.1987). It follows that Al-Najjar failed to meet his more demanding burden of showing the clear probability of future persecution required for withholding of deportation. *De Valle v. INS,*901 F.2d 787, 790 (9th Cir.1990) (quoting *Diaz-Escobar v. INS,*782 F.2d 1488, 1492 (9th Cir.1986)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# m8453.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.10.2017 C(2017) 7018 final To the notifying party Subject : Case M. 8453 – NESTLE / BPW Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 11 September 2017, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of the Merger Regulation by which Nestlé S. A. (Switzerland) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of NESTEA Business in all European countries except Spain, Portugal and Andorr a, currently operated by Beverage Partners Worldwide, S. A. (Switzerland), a full-function j oint-venture controlled by Nestlé and The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) (United States) , by way of contract . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Nestlé: the production, marketing and sale of milk products, ice-cream, nutrition and health science, drinks, as well as confectionery and pet care products, - for Nestea Business : the distribution and commercialisation of ready-to-drink (RTD) tea beverages, and beverages bases used in their production, under the NESTEA brand. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission ( signed ) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 310 , 19 . 9 .2017, p. 8 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc. (the "Registrant")
hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                                      /s/ William J. Ryan
                                                      ------------------------
                                                Name: William J. Ryan
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 16, 2005

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to TD Banknorth Inc. and will be
retained by TD Banknorth Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KACEY GRUDEM; CORY ) PETCOFF; SALLY PETCOFF; and ) THOMAS PETCOFF, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-510 ) BLACKHÄGEN-DESIGN, INC.; ) COOL-VIEW, LLC; DAVID M. ) MEDINIS; BRIAN HUMMEL; BRAD ) HUMMEL; HAWKEYE ) DISTRIBUTING, LLC; OPTILIGHT ) LLC; and LINDA DONALDSON; ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed August 28, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; George M. Jirotka, Judge. John W. Frost, II, Frost Law Firm, P.A., Bartow, for Appellant. Stephenie Biernacki Anthony and Lydia M. Gazda of Anthony & Partners, LLC, Tampa, for Appellee BlackHӓgenDesign, Inc. No appearance for remaining Appellees. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Haley and Senior Judge Coleman 

INLAND PAPERBOARD AND PACKAGING, INC. AND 

 INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF 

 PENNSYLVANIA 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 1188-06-2 PER CURIAM 

 AUGUST 29, 2006 

JUNIUS NELSON, JR. 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Angela C. Fleming; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for 

appellants. 

 (Louis D. Snesil; Marks & Harrison, on brief), for appellee. 

 Inland Paperboard and Packaging, Inc. and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ 

Compensation Commission finding that Junius Nelson, Jr. proved his disability and medical 

treatment after November 18, 2004 were causally related to his compensable September 7, 2004 

injury by accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion, and we hold 

that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the commission’s decision for the 

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Nelson v. Inland Paperboard and 

Packaging, Inc., VWC File No. 220-91-68 (April 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument 

and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code 

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
EX PARTE Michael Dewayne JACKSON

CR-17-0143

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.