Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Counsel Provided on Signature Pages]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

CALIFORNIA, a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROGER JINTEH ARRIGO CHEN, an individual; 

GENIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and DOES 1-25,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR 

PROCESS

Presiding: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Date: June 8, 2017

Time: 1:30 PM

Location: Courtroom 5, 17th Floor

Case Reassigned: March 1, 2017
Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

□ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

□ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an

early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for

ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

X Private ADR (please identify process and provider): to be determined.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

□ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the

order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

X other requested deadline: at an appropriate time to be agreed upon by the 

parties after a ruling on the dispositive motions due to be fully briefed on May

22, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Dated: April 14, 2017.

BAKER BOTTS LLP WILMER CUTLER PICKERING 

 HALE AND DORR LLP

/s/ Stuart C. Plunkett /s/ Robert J. Gunther, Jr.

Stuart C. Plunkett (State Bar No. 187971)

stuart.plunkett@bakerbotts.com

Ariel D. House (State Bar No. 280477)

ariel.house@bakerbotts.com

BAKER BOTTS LLP

101 California Street, Suite 3070

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 291-6200

Facsimile: (415) 291-6300

Paul R. Morico (pro hac vice)

paul.morico@bakerbotts.com

Elizabeth Durham Flannery (pro hac vice)

liz.durham@bakerbotts.com

Thomas P. Rooney (pro hac vice)

thomas.rooney@bakerbotts.com

BAKER BOTTS LLP

One Shell Plaza

901 Louisiana Street

Houston, Texas 77002

Telephone: (713) 229-1234

Facsimile: (713) 229-1522

Counsel for Plaintiff The Regents of the 

University of California

Robert J. Gunther, Jr. (NY SBN: 1967652) 

robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com

Omar Khan (pro hac vice)

omar.khan@wilmerhale.com

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE

AND DORR LLP

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

New York, NY 10007

Telephone: (212) 230-8800

Facsimile: (212) 230-8888

Robert M. Galvin (State Bar No. 171508)

robert.galvin@wilmerhale.com

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

AND DORR LLP

950 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: 650-858-6000

Facsimile: 650-858-6100 

Sarah B. Petty (pro hac vice)

sarah.petty@wilmerhale.com

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

AND DORR LLP

60 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

Telephone: 617-526-6000

Facsimile: 617-526-5000

Nora Q.E. Passamaneck (pro hac vice)

nora.passamaneck@wilmerhale.com

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE 

AND DORR LLP

1225 17th Street, Suite 2600 

Denver, CO 80202 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Telephone: 720-274-3135

Facsimile: 720-274-3133

Counsel for Defendants Roger Jinteh Arrigo 

Chen and Genia Technologies, Inc.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC 5 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

I, Robert J. Gunther, Jr., am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 

this Stipulation. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civil. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the 

concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

April 14, 2017 By: /s/ Robert J. Gunther, Jr. _______________

 Robert J. Gunther, Jr.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Robert J. Gunther, Jr., hereby certify that on April 14, 2017, I electronically filed the 

above document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send electronic 

notification of such filing to all registered counsel.

April 14, 2017 By: /s/ Robert J. Gunther, Jr. _______________

 Robert J. Gunther, Jr.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

SELECTING ADR PROCESS

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

Non-binding Arbitration

□ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

□ Mediation

X Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

□ 90 days from the date of this order.

X other: at an appropriate time to be determined after a ruling on the 

dispositive motions due to be fully briefed on May 22, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED_______________ ________________________________

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4/18/17

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen