alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Koos Timmermans,certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of ING Groep N.V.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

(d)    Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 5, 2018
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Michael F. Schmidt            
|Michael F. Schmidt                   
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on January 30, 2025.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual. (This meeting will be a hybrid meeting.)

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes and production would disclose investigative techniques.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2025-01699 Filed 1-21-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
N.S. v. R.N. and L.N.

2170054

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 9, 2018

Dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RANDAL WARDLE §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ 

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-0865-N

§

TIMBERLAWN MENTAL HEALTH §

SYSTEM §

§

Defendants. §

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This is an unspecified civil action brought by Plaintiff Randal Wardle, appearing pro se,

against the Timberlawn Mental Health System. In response to a Spears questionnaire, plaintiff

states that he did not intend to file this action in federal court. Instead, plaintiff advises that he sued

this defendant in Texas state court. The court treats this response as a notice of voluntary dismissal

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).

Rule 41(a)(1) provides that "an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff . . . by filing a notice

of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary

judgment, whichever first occurs . . ." FED R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1). This action was filed on April 26,

2005. Defendant has not been served with process or entered an appearance. Therefore, plaintiff

should be permitted to dismiss his complaint.

RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff's motion to dismiss should be granted and this action should be dismissed without

prejudice.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00865-N Document 5 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 11
A copy of this report and recommendation shall be served on all parties in the manner

provided by law. Any party may file written objections to the recommendation within 10 days after

being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The failure to file

written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual findings and legal

conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon

grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th

Cir. 1996).

DATED: June 22, 2005.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00865-N Document 5 Filed 06/22/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 12
STATE of Louisiana v. Bill RUMFIELD

NO. 2019-KK-0857

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-162888, 333-137273, 333-116528, 333-55838 and 333-35245) pertaining to the Incentive Plan of Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. and the Registration Statement on Form S-3(Registration No. 333-159237) of Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2009, except for Notes 4, 5 and 6 for which the date is August 17, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, of CarrizoOil & Gas, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Pannell Kerr Forster ofTexas, P.C. 

Houston, Texas 

March 31, 2011
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41114

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELIPE MILLAN-FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-01-CR-180-1

--------------------

April 19, 2002

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felipe

Millan-Flores has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Millan

has filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2. Millan’s motion for appointment of counsel is

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOHN HARRIS, §

Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No.

v. § 3:06-CV-0176-R

§ ECF

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION UNIT §

Drug Enforcement Administration, §

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of

United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The District Court reviewed de novo the proposed

Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Finding no error, the Court adopts the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 17th day of November, 2006.

 

JERRY BUCHMEYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00176-R Document 59 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 347
Rennie Frank HAULCOMB v. STATE

CR-16-0865

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
EX PARTE NEW MILLENNIUM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC

(In re: Donald Ray Counts v. New Millennium Property Management LLC )

2170257

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 1, 2018

Mand. pet. denied.
Ariel Ortega DUARTE, Appellant, v. Manuel ORTIZ, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-949

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019.

Philip D. Parrish, P.A.; Donna B. Michelson, P.A., and Donna B. Michelson, Coconut Grove; Darren J. Rousso, P.A., and Darren J. Rousso, Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for appellant.

Walton Lantaff Schroeder & Carson, LLP, and Michael H. Galex, Miami, and Laura R. Weinfeld, for appellees.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and MILLER1 , JJ.

1

Did not participate in oral argument.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Fuentes v. Sandel, Inc.*, 189 So.3d 928, 932-33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (holding that, absent direct and extensive control by property owner, the property owner is not liable to independent contractor who sustains injury while performing work at owner's property).
Robert BAISE, Jr. v. STATE

CR-16-1082

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Samuel MARKOVICH and Diamond Properties Northshore, L.L.C. v. Donald J. VILLERE, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of Mandeville; and Christopher Brown, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Building Official for the Department of Planning and Development, City of Mandeville

NO. 2019-C-0500

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

*202Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFPERIODIC REPORT**

The undersignedChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee Holdings Inc. (the “Company”),each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedDecember 28, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:April 16, 2007
| /s/ PETER C. BROWN                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Peter C. Brown                                                |   |
| Chairman of the Board,  Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| /s/ CRAIG R. RAMSEY                                      |   |
| Craig R. Ramsey                                               |   |
| Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer         |   |

 

[A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee HoldingsInc. and will be retained by Marquee Holdings Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

57

----
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Cathy Robinson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Community Bancorp,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Bancorp;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and15d—15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
 b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date May 12, 2005 /s/ Cathy Robinson      Cathy Robinson   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Provider's rating. See Beal, 865 N.E.2d at 1213 ("A reading of the contract

should not render any portion meaningless.").

The district court therefore properly granted summary judgment in favor of respondents. 1See Lake Constr. & Dev. Corp., 621 N.Y.S.2d at 338. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Ara H Shirinian, Settlement Judge Ballard Spahr, LLP Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk

'In light of the parties' contract, summary judgment was also proper with respect to appellant's claim for unjust enrichment. See Leasepartners Corp. v. Robert L. Brooks Trust Dated November 12, 1975, 113 Nev. 747, 755-56, 942 P.2d 182, 187 (1997) ("An action based on a theory of unjust enrichment is not available when there is an express, written contract, because no agreement can be implied when there is an express agreement"); see also PRG Brokerage Inc. v. Aramarine Brokerage, Inc., 968 N.Y.S.2d 439, 441 (App. Div. 2013) (same).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A 

### e
#### Daniel STALEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Kirkland Correctional Institution; Unidentified Parties, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-6022.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2004.

Decided May 21, 2004.

Daniel Staley, Appellant pro se.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*929PER CURIAM:

Daniel Staley appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.*
      *See Staley v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections,*No. CA-03-3436 (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

We note that Staley's objections to the report of the magistrate judge were timely under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2000). *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). We have considered the objections in reaching our decision.
Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE §

COMMISSION, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 

§

MEGAFUND CORPORATION, STANLEY §

A. LEITNER, SARDAUKER HOLDINGS, §

IBC., BRADLEY C. STARK, CIG, LTD., § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1328-L

and JAMES A. RUMPF, Individually and §

d/b/a CILAK INTERNATIONAL, §

§

Defendants, §

§

and §

§

PAMELA C. STARK, §

§

Relief Defendant. §

ORDER

This is a civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for

alleged violations of the federal securities laws. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the

court in implementation thereof, on February 27, 2006, this action was referred to United States

Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan for pretrial management. On February 13, 2007, the Findings and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed, recommending that the court

grant the Receiver’s Motion to Allow “A” Claim on Behalf of Lancorp Financial Receivership

Estate Against Megafund Receivership Estate [Doc. #257], to which no objections were filed.

Specifically, the magistrate judge recommended that the court grant the motion and, accordingly,

allow the claim of Lancorp Financial Receivership Estate in the amount of $8,365,000. 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 294 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2347
Order – Page 2

Having reviewed the pleadings, file and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions

of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct. The

magistrate judge’s findings are accepted as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants

Receiver’s Motion to Allow “A” Claim on Behalf of Lancorp Financial Receivership Estate Against

Megafund Receivership Estate and hereby allows the claim of Lancorp Financial Receivership

Estate in the amount of $8,365,000. 

 It is so ordered this 8th day of March, 2007.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 294 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2348