alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                               Exhibit 10.5



    List of Contents of Exhibits and Schedules to the Royal Indemnity Company
                        Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement



            Exhibits                              Description
            --------                              -----------

Exhibit A                              Form of Accounting and Settlement Reports

Exhibit B                              Form of Trust Agreement

Exhibit C                              Assignment of Net Premium Receivables

Exhibit D                              Assignment of Reinsurance Recoverables

Exhibit E                              URC Investment Guidelines



            Schedules                              Description
            ---------                              -----------

Schedule 2.1                           Terrorism Allocation Methodology

Schedule 2.4                           Reinsurance Contracts
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Vernon Samaroo, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Southridge Enterprises Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | /s/
      Vernon Samaroo         
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | VERNON SAMAROO                   
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | July 15, 2006                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### Ronald PERRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-6220.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 5, 2004.

Ronald Perro, Bay Shore, New York, for Appellant, pro se.

Claire S. Kedeshian, Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York (Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney; Steven J. Kim, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), Brooklyn, New York, for Appellee.

Present: RAGGI, WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and STEIN,2 District Judge.

2

. The Honorable Sidney H. Stein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the district court’s judgment entered September 10, 2003, is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-Appellant Ronald Perro appeals from a judgment of dismissal of his civil claim entered as a sanction pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f) and 37(b)(2)(C) for multiple failures to attend pretrial conferences. After Perro failed to appear at several initial conferences in his case, the district court, by order dated May 14, 2003, announced that if Perro failed to appear at the next conference, scheduled for June 4, 2003, “the Court shall recommend that the instant action be dismissed.” [DA.35] Perro did not appear on June 4, 2003, nor on June 17, when the district court afforded him the opportunity to appear telephonieally, nor on August 13. In setting each of these conference dates, the district court had cautioned Perro in writing that a failure to *50appear without advance notice or a showing of cause would result in dismissal. [DA.47, 51]

We review the district court’s Rule 16(f) sanction for abuse of discretion. *See Ashlodge, Ltd. v. Hauser,*163 F.3d 681, 683 (2d Cir.1998), *overruled on other grounds, as stated in New Pac. Overseas Group (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Excal Int’l Dev. Corp.,*252 F.3d 667, 669 (2d Cir.2001). Although “[dismissal with prejudice is a harsh remedy,” a district court may impose it “in appropriate cases,” such as when “a court finds willfulness, bad faith, or any fault” on the part of the party to be sanctioned. *Valentine v. Museum of Modem Art,*29 F.3d 47, 49-50 (2d Cir.1994) (per curiam). Moreover, “[t]he severe sanction of dismissal with prejudice may be imposed even against a plaintiff who is proceeding *pro se,*so long as a warning has been given that noncompliance can result in dismissal.” *Id.*at 50. This is because unexcused absences after receipt of such a warning are presumptively willful.

In this case, Perro’s unexcused failures to appear for scheduled conferences persisted after three explicit warnings that further disregard for the court’s orders would result in dismissal of his claim. On these facts, we find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in ordering dismissal.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment of dismissal is hereby AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
Dillon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Edward C. Dillon
--------------------
Edward C. Dillon,
Chief Executive Officer
October 24, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER INSTRUCTING QUALCOMM TO FILE UNDER SEAL UNREDACTED VERSION OF THE ENTIRE 

DONALDSON EXPERT REPORT, INCLUDING ANY EXHIBITS AND APPENDICES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER INSTRUCTING QUALCOMM 

TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

UNREDACTED VERSION OF THE 

ENTIRE DONALDSON EXPERT 

REPORT, INCLUDING ANY 

EXHIBITS AND APPENDICES

Re: Dkt. No. 799

On August 30, 2018, Defendant Qualcomm, Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) filed a motion to 

exclude the opinions of Richard Donaldson. ECF No. 799. Pursuant to Court order, ECF No. 901,

Qualcomm filed the unredacted expert report of Richard Donaldson, but has failed to attach the 

exhibits and appendices to his expert report. The Court hereby ORDERS Qualcomm to file under 

seal an unredacted version of Richard Donaldson’s entire expert report, including any exhibits and 

appendices, by December 7, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 964 Filed 12/06/18 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER INSTRUCTING QUALCOMM TO FILE UNDER SEAL UNREDACTED VERSION OF THE ENTIRE 

DONALDSON EXPERT REPORT, INCLUDING ANY EXHIBITS AND APPENDICES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Dated: December 6, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 964 Filed 12/06/18 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 3 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 4 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 5 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 6 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 7 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 8 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 9 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 10 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 11 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 12 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 13 of 14
Case 3:17-mj-70071-MAG Document 5 Filed 02/03/17 Page 14 of 14
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and amendments thereto

       Form S-8 No. 33-21505    Employee Stock Purchase Plan
       Form S-8 No. 333-41671   Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan
       Form S-8 No. 333-41669   1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
       Form S-8 No. 333-66026   1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
       Form S-8 No. 333-41673   Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
       Form S-8 No. 333-42131   Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
       Form S-8 No. 333-66018   Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
       Form S-8 No. 333-54734   Stock Grant Plan

of Beverly Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2002 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Beverly Enterprises,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2001.


                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Little Rock, Arkansas
March 26, 2002
K.P., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-132

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.2(b)




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
18, 2000 relating to the December 31, 1999 consolidated  financial statements of
Jones  Intercable,  Inc.,  which  report is  included as an exhibit in this Form
10-K, into the Company's  previously filed S-3  Registration  Statement File No.
333-46736.  It should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements
of Jones Intercable, Inc. subsequent to December 31, 1999 or performed any audit
procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Denver, Colorado,
   March 28, 2002.
Jimmy Korea DAVIS v. STATE

CR-16-0892

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Shawn M. OConnor, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pharsight Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 29, 2005



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/    SHAWN M.
OCONNOR                       
|Shawn M. OConnor                              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
EX PARTE Edward Charles LEWIS

1170052 (CR-16-0271)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty Trust (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005**(the “Report”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company. 

 

 
| March 9, 2006 | /s/         Joseph  Macnow |                                                                                             |
|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | Name:                                                                   | Joseph Macnow                                                                                    |
|          | Title:                                                                  | Chief Financial Officer  of  Vornado Realty Trust,  sole general partner of Vornado  Realty L.P. |
|               |                                                                         |                                                                                                  |  |  |

 

----
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

# **Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of VornadoRealty Trust, sole general partner of Vornado Realty L.P. (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report onForm 10-K for year ended December 31, 2011**(the “Report”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 

|          |   |   |
|---------------|--------|--------|
| March 2, 2012 |   |   | /s/ Joseph Macnow |
|          |   | Name:  | Joseph Macnow |
|          |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer of Vornado  Realty Trust,  sole general partner of Vornado Realty L.P. |
|          |   |   |   |   |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ST. PAUL REINSURANCE COMPANY

LIMITED LONDON,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.

and BEECHE SYSTEMS

CORPORATION,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C05-1912 BZ

ORDER SCHEDULING 

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

On February 20, 2008, defendant wrote the court about a

pending discovery dispute. In violation of the Order

Scheduling Jury Trial and Pretrial matters issued December 21,

2007, plaintiff did not reply. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a

telephone conference is scheduled for Friday, February 29,

2008 at 9:45 a.m. to: (1) discuss the pending discovery

dispute and (2) permit plaintiff to explain why it should not

be sanctioned for its failure to comply with the court’s
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

order.

Counsel for defendant shall contact CourtCall, telephonic

court appearances at 1-888-882-6878, and make arrangements for

the telephonic conference call. 

Dated: February 25, 2008

 Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

g:\bzall\-bzcases\st.paul reinsurance.tel conf.ord.wpd
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 24.2

Power of Attorney of Paul D. Beckham


STATE OF GEORGIA

COUNTY OF FULTON


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Paul D. Beckham, a Director of EDUTREK
INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia corporation, do constitute and appoint Steve
Bostic and Daniel D. Moore, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-
in-fact, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for me in any
and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for EDUTREK
INTERNATIONAL, INC. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
incorporating such changes as any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems
appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-
fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 5th day of
March 1999.



                             /s/ Paul D. Beckham
                             ---------------------
                             Paul D. Beckham



                                ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                --------------

BEFORE me this 5th day of March 1999, came Paul D. Beckham, personally known to
me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of
Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                             /s/  Dee Ann Stone
                             ------------------
                             NOTARY PUBLIC


                             State of Georgia
                                      -------

                             My Commission Expires:

                             February 1, 2003
                             ----------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

PAMELA L. DUMAS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No. 5:05-CV-174-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER

Plaintiff is appealing an adverse decision of the Defendant, Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The United States Magistrate

Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on April 26, 2006. No written objections have been

filed. It is, therefore,

ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation are

hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court and that the above-styled and

-numbered cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated May 23, 2006.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 5:05-cv-00174-C Document 14 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 76