alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LISA K. BRYAN )

)

V. ) 3-06-CV-413-P

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice )

Correctional Institutions Division )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the

proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court

accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 14 day of April 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00413-P Document 5 Filed 04/14/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LISA K. BRYAN )

)

V. ) 3-06-CV-413-P

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice )

Correctional Institutions Division )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a

de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which

objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this ____ day of _________, 2006.

 

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00413-P Document 5 Filed 04/14/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 20
FTC RESPONSE TO

QUALCOMM MOTION TO SEAL

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jennifer Milici, D.C. Bar No. 987096

Daniel Matheson, D.C. Bar No. 502490

Mark J. Woodward, D.C. Bar No. 479537

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

(202) 326-2912; (202) 326-3496 (fax)

jmilici@ftc.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a 

Delaware corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK

PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE 

COMMISSION’S RESPONSE TO 

QUALCOMM MOTION TO SEAL

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1223 Filed 01/10/19 Page 1 of 2
1

FTC RESPONSE TO

QUALCOMM MOTION TO SEAL

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

At the pretrial conference, Qualcomm stated that “there may be a small number of things

Qualcomm would consider confidential still.” (ECF No. 1005 at 11.) The FTC has repeatedly 

requested that Qualcomm identify which of its documents, fewer than 100 of which were created 

in the last 36 months, Qualcomm would seek to seal. Qualcomm has refused to provide that 

information, which would have allowed the parties to confer regarding ways to minimize the 

burden on the Court. 

In light of the sealing motions that Qualcomm filed with the Court yesterday, the FTC will 

agree not to use with witnesses on Friday the following documents:

CX5952

CX8195

CX8196

If the FTC determines that it may use these documents with subsequent witnesses, it will provide 

appropriate notice to Qualcomm.

Dated: January 10, 2019

Respectfully submitted,

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

/s/ Jennifer Milici 

Jennifer Milici

Daniel Matheson

Mark J. Woodward

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

(202) 326-2912; (202) 326-3496 (fax)

jmilici@ftc.gov

Attorneys for Federal Trade Commission

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1223 Filed 01/10/19 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 559P A 11

- 2 FILED 12 JUNE 2014 BRUCE LEE GRIFFIN ,

Petitioner

v. MIKE BALL, Administrator, A/M Corre. Inst. #4680,

Respondent

On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 32(b) to review an order of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (20 13 ), allowing petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and vacating a judgment entered by Judge Laura J. Bridges on 11 February 2010 in Superior Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 15 April 2014

. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackm a n, Assistant Appellate Defender, for petitioner

- appell ee . Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde , Assistant Attorney General, for the State respondent

- appellant.

PER CURIAM.
Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the order of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, th e order of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed

. See,G RIFFIN V
. B ALL Opinion of the Court

- 2

- e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary , 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State , 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 3.3
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF
PIXELWORKS, INC.
   Principal Office
 Registered Office
   Annual Meeting
 Special Meeting
 Place of Meetings
 Notice of Meetings
 Waiver of Notice




---



##### 



Record Date
    Shareholders List for Meeting
 Quorum; Adjournment




---



##### 



Voting Requirements
 Proxies
   Corporations Acceptance of Votes




---



##### 








---



##### 



Notice of Business to be Conducted at Meeting
      Duties
 Number and Qualification




---



##### 



Chairman of the Board of Directors
 Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice




---



##### 



Waiver of Notice
 Quorum
 Manner of Acting
    Vacancies
 Compensation




---



##### 



Presumption of Assent
 Director Conflict of Interest
     Removal




---



##### 



Resignation
 Nominations for Election to Board of Directors




---



##### 



Designation of Executive Committee
 Powers of Executive Committee
 Procedures; Meetings; Quorum




---



##### 



Other Committees
 
 Number
 Appointment and Term of Office




---



##### 



Qualification
 Resignation and Removal
 Vacancies
 President
 Vice Presidents
 Secretary




---



##### 



Assistant Secretaries
 Salaries
   Certificates for Shares




---



##### 



Transfer of Shares
 Transfer Agent and Registrar
 Officer Ceasing to Act
   Contracts
 Loans
 Checks: Drafts
  
 Seal




---



##### 



Severability
**Exhibit 32.1****Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Novelis Inc. (the Company),hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.              /s/ Martha Finn Brooks   Martha Finn Brooks   President and Chief Operating Officer
Lori HOPPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4081

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

TIMOTHY BALDWIN, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 992 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT NO. 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements Nos. 333-59693, 333-59695 and 333-63269 of Avis Group
Holdings, Inc. (formerly Avis Rent A Car, Inc.) on Form S-8 of our report dated
January 26, 2000 (March 27, 2000 as to Note 1), appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Avis Group Holdings, Inc. (formerly Avis Rent A Car, Inc.) for
the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2000
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            WEST POINTE BANCORP, INC.
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the annual report of West Pointe Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Terry W. Schaefer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Terry W. Schaefer
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Terry W. Schaefer
                                                   President and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer

March 26, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered December 19, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00806-CR

No. 05-16-00807-CR

No. 05-16-00808-CR

JALEN DEMARCUS FISHER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-34701-T, F12-62676-T & F15-76192-T

ORDER

We GRANT the State’s December 13, 2016 first amended motion to extend time and 

ORDER the brief received on December 12, 2016 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Samuel BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4725

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 292 

Designating July 9, 2021, as ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation Day’’ and recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic and classic cars 

is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and 

cultural heritage of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 9, 2021, as ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation 

Day’’ and recognizing that the collection and restoration 

of historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic 

automobiles as a pastime and do so with great passion 

and as a means of individual expression; 

Whereas the Senate recognizes the effect that the more than 

100-year history of the automobile has had on the economic progress of the United States and supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restoration and exhibition of classic automobiles; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 292 ATS 

Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses 

have been instrumental in preserving a historic part of 

the heritage of the United States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage works of art; 

Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, highskilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, 

photography, cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits 

that have become part of the popular culture of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 9, 2021, as ‘‘Collector Car 

3 Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that the collection and restora5 tion of historic and classic cars is an important part 

6 of preserving the technological achievements and cul7 tural heritage of the United States; 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to engage in events and commemorations of Col10 lector Car Appreciation Day in accordance with pub11 lic health guidelines; and 

12 (4) recognizes that Collector Car Appreciation 

13 Day events and commemorations create opportuni14 ties for collector car owners to educate young people 

15 about the importance of preserving the cultural herVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:32 Jun 25, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR292.ATS SR292

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 292 ATS 

1 itage of the United States, including through the 

2 collection and restoration of collector cars. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Robert Kenneth BENJAMIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4940

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

Independent
Auditors Consent

The Board of DirectorsChampps
Entertainment, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements Nos. 333-106792, 333-90287, 333-32501, and 333-32503
 on Forms S-8, and
registration statement No. 333-102261 on Form S-3, of Champps Entertainment, Inc. of our
report dated August 15, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Champps
Entertainment, Inc. as of June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended June 29, 2003, which report appears in the June
29, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Champps Entertainment, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Denver, ColoradoSeptember
19, 2003
Christopher Lynn CORMIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3308

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nelson
Stark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
             of the Company.




/s/ Nelson Stark
----------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2540
PYLORD P. DOE, M.D. Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 153-AMD) Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: March 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pylord P. Doe, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Donna Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, on his Title VII claims. The district court found that Appellant cannot avail himself of Title VII's protections because he was not a government employee or an applicant for employment. We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Appellee's motion to strike exhibits attached to Appellant's brief tothe extent that they were not part of the record below, deny Appellant's motion not to strike, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Doe v. Shalala , No. CA-95-153-AMD (D. Md. Aug. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Maysville Marketsquare Associates, L.P.
North Coast Health Center (JV Partnership)
Oregon Food Stores, Inc.
Oregon Real Estate Services, Inc.
OP Walnut Creek, LLC
Pan Pacific (Cable Park), LLC
Pan Pacific (Clackamas), Inc.
Pan Pacific (Kienow's), L.P.
Pan Pacific (Clackamas), LLC
Pan Pacific (Marina Village), LLC
Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC
Pan Pacific (Pinecreek), L.P.
Pan Pacific (Rancho Las Palmas), LLC
Pan Pacific (RLP), Inc.
Pan Pacific (Sunset Mall), LLC
Pan Pacific Development (Chino), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Kentucky), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (New Mexico), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Olympia Square), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Rosewood), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee) Acquisition, Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee), L.P.
Pan Pacific U.S. Shopping Center I, LP
Sahara Pavilion North U.S., Inc.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A0 81 4 . BRI AN C. LAVERNEZ v . CELI A A. LAVERNEZ

.

Bri an C. Lav ern ez an d Cel i a A. Lav ern ez were d i v o rced i n 2 00 6

. Bri an Lav ern ez fi l ed a m o ti on t o m o d ify hi s ch i l d s u p p o rt o b l i g at io n s

. Th e t ri al co urt d en i ed
h i s m o t i o n

. Lav ern ez t hereaft er fi l ed a m o t io n fo r n ew t ri al
, wh i ch t h e t ri al co u rt al s o d en ied . He n o w s eek s t o ap p eal t h e d en i al o f h i s m o t i o n fo r n ew t ri al

. Th e Geo rg i a Su p rem e Co u rt h as a p p e l l a te ju ri s d i ct i on o v er al l di v o rce an d
al i m o n y cas es , i n cl ud i n g t h o se cas es an ci l l ary t o t h e d i vo rc e p r o c eed i n g s

. See Ga.
Co n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3
, Art

. V I, Sec. VI, Par. III (6 ); Mo r r i s v. S u r g es , 2 8 4 Ga. 7 4 8
, 7 5 0 (2 ) (6 7 0 SE2 d 8 4 ) (2 0 0 8 ); s ee al s o To d d v. To d d
, 2 8 7 Ga. 2 5 0 , 2 5 1-2 5 2 (1 ) (6 9 6 SE2 d
3 2 3 ) (2 0 10 ). In Geo rg i a, wh en t h e o b l i g at i o n t o p ay ch i l d s u p p o rt ari ses fro m a p ri o r d i v o rce p ro ceed in g , ch i l d s u p po rt i s a fo rm o f al i m o n y

. See Sp u r l o ck v. Dep t

. of
Hu ma n R es o u r ces , 28 6 Ga. 5 12
, 5 1 3 -5 1 4 (1 ) (6 9 0 SE2 d 37 8 ) (2 0 1 0 ); Jo n es v. Jo n es , 2 8 0 Ga. 7 1 2
, 7 1 5 -7 1 6 (2 ) (6 3 2 SE2 d 1 2 1 ) (2 0 0 6 ). Becau s e Lav ern ez’ s ap peal o f t h e ch i l d s u p p o rt o rd er fal l s wi t h i n th e Su p rem e Co u rt ’ s ju ri s d i ct i o n , t hi s ap p eal i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su prem e Co u rt fo r res o lu t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. December 20, 2016

12/20/2016