alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1

                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Equality Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
333-43655, 333-63121, 333-79805 and 333-79807 on Form S-8 of Equality
Bancorp, Inc. (Equality) of our report dated June 26, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Equality Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity, cash flows and comprehensive income for each of the
years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2000, which report appears in
the March 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Equality.



                                 /s/ KPMG LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
June 29, 2000

                                    91
Juan C. LOPEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1909

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1378

In re: ROBERT SIGLER,

 Movant.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:19-ct-03335-D)

Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: June 23, 2020 

Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert T. Sigler, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Sigler petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district 

court to liberally construe his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint and to order the 

defendants to pay Sigler $700,000 in punitive damages. We conclude that Sigler is not

entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re 

Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is 

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy-Brown, 

907 F.3d at 795. As relevant here, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. 

In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Sigler is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we 

deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
1

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00217-EJD

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CARLOS CARTAGENA ANTUNEZ,

Plaintiff-Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III et al.,

Defendants-Respondents.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00217-EJD 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on January 17, 2017. Dkt. No. 1. 

Respondents moved to dismiss the petition on April 14, 2017. Dkt. No. 14. The deadline for 

Petitioner’s opposition to Respondents’ motion was April 28, 2017. Petitioner has not filed an 

opposition.

The Court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed 

for failure to prosecute. If Petitioner does not, by 4:00 p.m. on June 23, 2017, file or cause to be 

filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, or otherwise demonstrate good cause in 

writing why this case should not be dismissed, the Court will dismiss the action with prejudice 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise 

ordered by the Court.

The hearing scheduled for June 29, 2017, is VACATED and will be reset if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2017

______________________________________

EDWARD J. DAVILA

United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optionable, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas F Burchill, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







May 14, 2010





/s/ Thomas F. Burchill


Thomas F. Burchill


Chief Executive Officer and President


(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF TRAILER BRIDGE, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      14,277,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,054,813
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,165,874)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,931,359
<PP&E>                                      35,823,040
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,540,429)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,894,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,951,543
<BONDS>                                     34,082,957
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,775
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,762,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,894,457
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,388,577
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,204,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               381,691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             548,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,445,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (29,237)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,416,122)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,416,122)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)


</TABLE>
Order - Page 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DEBORAH L. LEGGETT, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1959-L

§

AMERICA’S SERVICING CO., et al., §

 §

Defendants. §

ORDER

This is a breach of contract and wrongful foreclosure action brought under the Real Estate

Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), the Fair Debt Collection

Practices Act (“FDCPA”), the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), and the Texas Debt

Collection Act (“TDCA”). Pursuant to an order of reference dated May 30, 2007, Defendant MHI

Partnership, Ltd’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings was referred to United States

Magistrate Judge Wm. F. Sanderson, Jr., for findings and recommendation. The Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed August 1, 2007.

No objections have been filed. 

The magistrate judge recommended that the court grant Defendant MHI’s motion to compel

arbitration, and further recommended that, as requested by Defendant, the claims against MHI

should be stayed pending arbitration. Having reviewed the pleadings, file and record in this case,

and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that they are correct

and therefore accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, the court grants MHI’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. Plaintiff
Order - Page 2 

and Defendant MHI are hereby directed to arbitrate Plaintiff’s claims against MHI in accordance

with the Residential Earnest Money Contract. The court therefore stays Plaintiff’s claims of breach

of contract, wrongful foreclosure, TILA, DTPA, FDCPA, TDCA, RESPA, and injunctive relief

against Defendant MHI. Plaintiff’s claims against the other Defendants will proceed.

It is so ordered this 22nd day of August, 2007.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge
Denaldo FORBES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1599

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2019]

Denaldo Forbes, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, May and Ciklin, JJ., concur.
Temaris Rashun BROWN v. STATE

CR-16-0958

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Eva Electris CANNIE aka Ava Electris Cannie aka Eve Helene Cannie, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-2531

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 13, 2019

Eva Electris Cannie, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1



V. I. Technologies, Inc.

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of V. I.
Technologies, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, John R. Barr, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Thomas T. Higgins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each singly certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 23, 2003



|                                     |  |  |  |                                          
|------------------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/    JOHN R. BARR                  |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS T. HIGGINS                 
|John R. Barr Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Thomas T. Higgins Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1256 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1074, K2025-1073.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00882 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
B.C. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160832

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

Affirmed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 192 

Expressing support for the designation of May 2021 as ‘‘Motorcycle Safety 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2021 

Ms. ERNST (for herself and Mr. PETERS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 2021 as 

‘‘Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas motorcycling is a great United States tradition enjoyed by an estimated 30,000,000 people annually, representing approximately 11 percent of the population; 

Whereas motorcycles are a valuable component of the transportation mix; 

Whereas motorcycles are fuel-efficient and decrease congestion while having little impact on our Nation’s transportation infrastructure; 

Whereas the motorcycling community promotes rider safety 

education, licensing, and motorcycle awareness; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 192 IS 

Whereas the motorcycling community is committed to decreasing motorcycle crashes through training and safety 

education, personal responsibility, and increased public 

awareness; 

Whereas approximately 91 percent of motorcycles are operated on highways in conjunction with other vehicles; 

Whereas motorcyclist deaths occur more frequently than fatalities in passenger vehicles; 

Whereas motorcycle awareness is beneficial to all road users 

and will help decrease motorcycle accidents; and 

Whereas the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

promotes Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month to encourage riders to be properly licensed, receive training, wear 

personal protective equipment, such as helmets, jackets, 

boots, and gloves, and to remind all riders and motorists 

to always share the road: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of May 2021 as 

3 ‘‘Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the contribution of motorcycles 

5 to the transportation mix; 

6 (3) encourages motorcycle awareness by all 

7 road users; 

8 (4) recognizes that motorcyclists have a right to 

9 the road and that all motorists should safely share 

10 the roadways; 

11 (5) encourages rider safety education, training, 

12 and proper gear for safe motorcycle operation; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 192 IS 

1 (6) supports the goals of Motorcycle Safety 

2 Awareness Month. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Pegasus Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan K. Cole,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ SUSAN K. COLE

Susan K. Cole
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2003
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden West Brewing Company, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John C. Power, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/John C. Power John C. Power, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer May 15, 2007
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 5 of 11 PageID 5
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10
Case 3:06-cv-00147-H Document 1 Filed 01/20/06 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11
Kevin L. TURNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1989

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Optionable, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas F Burchill,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






May 15, 2009


/s/
Thomas F. Burchill


Thomas F.
Burchill


Chief
Executive Officer and President


(Principal
Executive Officer)
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Jeff Jones, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Barbara F. Newman, J.H.O.), rendered June 14, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of violating Public Health Law ยง 229, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Barbara F. Newman, J.H.O.), rendered June 14, 2017, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and fine, if paid, remitted.</p><p>As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his <i>Boykin </i>rights (<i>see Boykin v Alabama</i>, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; <i>People v Tyrell</i>, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (<i>cf. People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 19, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Jared GUIDRY and Leigha Woods v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and Ronald Chambers

No. 2019-C-0223

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

Writ denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Judge Marc Johnson.
Emmett JACKSON v. MODERN HOMES AND EQUIPMENT CO.

2160856

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 16, 2018

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Wendell Lovell SMITH

1170078 (CR-16-0392)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Curtis CLEMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2106

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.