alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**

 

I, Robert K. Mills, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2005 of Tri-S Security Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements and other financial information included in this report,fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

----

 

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:  November21, 2005

 
|   | /s/Robert K. Mills      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert K. Mills,        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ardent Acquisition Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I Marc H. Klee, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By:
       /s/ Marc H. Klee |                                              | Dated: August 14, 2006
|--------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|                            | Marc H. Klee                                 |                       
|                            | President and Chief Financial Officer        |                       
|                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |                       

---
Nickki Pierre CHARLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-392

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

Nickki Pierre Charles, Clermont, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Nickki Pierre Charles challenges the order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We remand on grounds five and ten because the postconviction court failed to address those grounds. We affirm in all other respects.

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f)(8)(A) provides that the postconviction court must "make findings of fact and conclusions of law" with respect to the issues raised in the postconviction motion and addressed at an evidentiary hearing. If the court does not address each ground raised in the postconviction motion, the court's ruling on the unaddressed ground must be reversed and remanded for the court to enter the required findings. *Dillbeck v. State* , 882 So. 2d 969, 971-72 (Fla. 2004) ; *see also**Hauter v. State* , 206 So. 3d 839, 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (reversing in part order denying rule 3.850 motion and remanding for court to address claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on cumulative error where claim, though raised in motion, was not addressed in order).

Here, the postconviction court generally denied all grounds in its final order "for the reasons announced by the Court on the record in detail at the conclusion of the Rule 3.850 evidentiary hearing." However, a review of the record reveals that the court did not address grounds five or ten either orally or in writing. We recognize that claims of cumulative error, as alleged in ground ten, are appropriately denied when every other ground for relief is rejected, but nevertheless the ground must be addressed. Thus, on remand, the court shall enter an order making findings of fact and conclusions of law as to grounds five and ten.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

COHEN, LAMBERT, and SASSO, JJ., concur.
EX PARTE Eric WASHINGTON

1161086 (CR-16-0075)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, M. Mark Urbania, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|/S/    M. MARK
URBANIA                                                                         
|M. Mark Urbania Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

October 30, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.87

                        ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This addendum, dated February 14, 2003, reflects a modification to the
Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") between Viragen, Inc. ("Employer") and
Douglas D. Lind M.D. ("Employee").

Whereas, both Employer and Employee intend to modify Employee's Employment
Agreement dated June 14, 2002. It is agreed the following paragraphs shall be
added to the paragraph 5 of the Agreement.

         Effective February 14, 2003, Employer and Employee agree to reduce
         Employee's cash salary by 20%, from $250,000 per annum to $200,000 per
         annum resulting in a cash salary reduction of $50,000 per annum (the
         "Reduction").

         In lieu of cash consideration equal to the Reduction, Employer agrees
         to issue and Employee agrees to accept an amount of Viragen, Inc.
         common stock equivalent in value to the amount of the Reduction, valued
         at the closing market price at the end of each pay period.

         Employee acknowledges that common shares issued pursuant to this
         Addendum shall be unregistered shares under Securities and Exchange
         Commission guidelines. Employer agrees to use its best efforts to
         register these shares within 90 days of issuance.

         Both Employer and Employee agree and acknowledge that the Reduction is
         voluntary on the part of the Employee and may be unilaterally rescinded
         at any time.

         All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.

                                                     VIRAGEN, INC.

/s/ Douglas D. Lind                                  /s/ Dennis W. Healey
-------------------------------                      ---------------------------
Douglas D. Lind                                      Dennis W. Healey
Employee                                             Exec. Vice President/CFO
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6194

JIMMY D. DUNIGAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK, Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:05-hc-00349-BO) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 26, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy D. Dunigan, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jimmy D. Dunigan, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dunigan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Ashley K. FINCH v. Lonnie J. FINCH

2170374

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

Dismissed.
Alexandre R. TALUY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-392

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Jean-Jacques A. Darius, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, and MORRIS and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Jerome DUPLECHAIN v. KINDER MORGAN G.P., INC. a/k/a KMGP Services Company, Inc., and a/k/a Kinder Morgan, Ship Channel Services, Hereinafter Referred to as "Kinder Morgan"

NO. 2019-CC-0282

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

PER CURIAM

In this application, plaintiff seeks review of a ruling of the district court excluding from evidence certain Coast Guard documents obtained by plaintiff pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request.

Considering the specific and narrow facts of this case, we find the district court abused its discretion in excluding the Coast Guard documents. These documents are relevant to the issue of whether defendants properly filed the required notice with the Coast Guard following plaintiff's accident.

Accordingly, the writ is granted. The judgment of the district court is reversed, *300and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Weimer, Guidry & Clark, JJ., would deny.
Exhibit 32.1


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the
?Company?) on Form 10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the ?Report?), I, Joe Puentes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.





/s/ Joe Puentes
----------------------------------
    Joe Puentes,
    Chief Executive Officer

September 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.






                             Exhibit 32.2


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the
?Company?) on Form 10-QSB for the six months  ending June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the ?Report?), I, Edward Dillon, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.





/s/ Edward Dillon
----------------------------------
    Edward Dillon
    Chief Financial Officer

September 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE> 1




                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Board of Directors
Equality Mortgage Corporation
St. Louis, Missouri

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Equality Mortgage
Corporation as of March 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related statements of
income, retained earnings and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Equality Mortgage
Corporation as of March 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.


                                      /s/ RUBIN, BROWN, GORNSTEIN & CO. LLP


April 13, 2000
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT CASE NO. 3:17-cv-00211-JST 

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. WITH PREJUDICE 

DOLL 

AMIR 

&

ELEY LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NICOLAS A. AGUILAR,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL 

CORPORATION, EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 

LLC; AND, TRANS UNION, LLC, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00211-JST

Assigned to Hon. Jon S. Tigar 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING DEFENDANT 

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), 

N.A. WITH PREJUDICE 

[Joint Stipulation of Dismissal filed 

concurrently herewith] 

Complaint Filed: 01/16/2017 

Trial Date: TBA 

 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00211-JST 

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. WITH PREJUDICE 

DOLL 

AMIR 

&

ELEY LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the stipulation by and between Plaintiff 

Nicolas A. Aguilar and Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., erroneously sued 

as Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One”), to dismiss the above-captioned 

action with prejudice. 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court approves the Stipulation and orders 

as follows: 

Plaintiff’s claims against Capital One in this action are hereby DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 11, 2017 _________________________________

 The Honorable Jon S. Tigar 

United States District Court Judge
exv10wxay



 




Exhibit 10(a)




FleetBoston Financial Corporation

Revised Schedule of Executive Officers Who Have Entered into

Certain Change in Control Agreements





	A.	 	Benefit — 3x Base Plus Bonus:
	 
	 	 	Eugene M. McQuade

H. Jay Sarles

Anne M. Finucane

Richard A. Higginbotham

Brian T. Moynihan

M. Anne Szostak
	 
	B.	 	Benefit — 2x Base Plus Bonus:
	 
	 	 	Kenneth Sax

Norman J. DeLuca

Terrence P. Laughlin

Ernest L. Puschaver

Douglas L. Jacobs
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, J. Peter Farquhar, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tarpon Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
1

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 23, 2005                                                                               /s/ J. Peter Farquhar   J. Peter Farquhar,    Chief Executive Officer   
2