8940 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 4, 2025 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s website. 

2Commissioner David S. Johanson voted to 

conduct full reviews. 

3The Commission has found the response 

submitted on behalf of Leggett & Platt, Incorporated 

to be individually adequate. Comments from other 

interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 

207.62(d)(2)). 

‘‘pressure sensor’’ limitations of claim 

27 of the ’123 patent and thus literally 

practices claims 27 and 32 of the ’123 

patent; (iii) finds that the asserted 

JUUL2 DI system practices claims 27 

and 32 of the ’123 patent under the 

doctrine of equivalents (‘‘DOE’’) and, 

therefore, affirms with modified 

reasoning the ID’s finding that JLI has 

satisfied the technical prong of the DI 

requirement as to the ’123 patent based 

on this product; (iv) takes no position 

on whether JLI has satisfied the 

technical prong of the DI requirement as 

to the ’123 patent based on the RevB 

and JAGWAR iterations of the JUUL DI 

system; and (v) modifies Order No. 22 

to vacate and take no position on 

whether JLI has satisfied the economic 

prong of the DI requirement as to the 

’123 patent based on the JUUL DI 

system. Accordingly, the Commission 

affirms with modified reasoning the ID’s 

finding that JLI has shown a violation of 

section 337 by NJOY as to claims 27 and 

32 of the ’123 patent. 

As to the ’173 patent, the 

Commission: (i) affirms with modified 

analysis the ID’s construction of the 

term ‘‘mouthpiece’’ recited in claim 1 of 

the ’173 patent; (ii) takes no position on 

the ID’s construction of the term 

‘‘disposed within’’ recited in claim 1 of 

the ’173 patent; (iii) takes no position on 

the ID’s finding that the JUUL2 DI 

system practices claims 1 and 4 of the 

’173 patent; and (iv) modifies Order No. 

22 to vacate and take no position on 

whether JLI has satisfied the economic 

prong of the DI requirement as to the 

’173 patent based on the JUUL2 DI 

system. Accordingly, the Commission 

affirms with modified analysis the ID’s 

finding that JLI has shown a violation of 

section 337 by NJOY as to claims 1 and 

4 of the ’173 patent. 

The Commission has determined that 

the appropriate remedy is: (i) an LEO 

prohibiting the importation of certain 

vaporizer devices, cartridges used 

therewith, and components thereof that 

infringe one or more of claims 1 and 15 

of the ’722 patent, claims 1 and 8 of the 

’981 patent, claims 27 and 32 of the ’123 

patent, and claims 1 and 4 of the ’173 

patent; and (ii) CDOs against each of the 

NJOY respondents. The Commission has 

also determined that the public interest 

factors do not preclude issuance of the 

remedial orders. The Commission has 

further determined to impose no bond 

(zero percent bond) for importations of 

the excluded articles imported during 

the period of Presidential review (19 

U.S.C. 1337(j)). 

The Commission issues its opinion 

herewith setting forth its determinations 

on certain issues. This investigation is 

hereby terminated. 

The Commission’s orders and opinion 

were delivered to the President and 

United States Trade Representative on 

the day of their issuance. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on January 29, 

2025. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 29, 2025. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2025–02169 Filed 2–3–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1140–1142 

(Third Review)] 

Uncovered Innerspring Units From 

China, South Africa, and Vietnam; 

Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year 

Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of expedited 

reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on uncovered innerspring units 

from China, South Africa, and Vietnam 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury within 

a reasonably foreseeable time. 

DATES: December 9, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rachel Devenney (202–205–3172), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this proceeding may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On December 9, 2024, 

the Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (89 

FR 71414, September 3, 2024) of the 

subject five-year reviews was adequate 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct expedited reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act 

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).2

For further information concerning 

the conduct of these reviews and rules 

of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B 

(19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the reviews has been 

placed in the nonpublic record, and will 

be made available to persons on the 

Administrative Protective Order service 

list for these reviews on February 26, 

2025. A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of 

the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

§ 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, 

interested parties that are parties to the 

reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,3 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determinations 

the Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

5:15 p.m. on March 6, 2025, and may 

not contain new factual information. 

Any person that is neither a party to the 

five-year reviews nor an interested party 

may submit a brief written statement 

(which shall not contain any new 

factual information) pertinent to the 

reviews by March 6, 2025. However, 

should the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for 

its completion of the final results of its 

reviews, the deadline for comments 

(which may not contain new factual 

information) on Commerce’s final 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 4, 2025 / Notices 8941 

results is three business days after the 

issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s Handbook on 

Filing Procedures, available on the 

Commission’s website at https://

www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_

on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates 

upon the Commission’s procedures with 

respect to filings. 

In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 

207.3 of the rules, each document filed 

by a party to the reviews must be served 

on all other parties to the reviews (as 

identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined these reviews are 

extraordinarily complicated and 

therefore has determined to exercise its 

authority to extend the review period by 

up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of 

the Act; this notice is published 

pursuant to § 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 29, 2025. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2025–02170 Filed 2–3–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

Adjustment of Certain Dollar Amounts 

Applicable to Bankruptcy Cases 

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Notice of adjusted dollar 

amounts. 

SUMMARY: Certain dollar amounts in the 

United States Code applicable to 

bankruptcy cases are adjusted to reflect 

the change in the Consumer Price Index 

for All Urban Consumers for the most 

recent 3-year period ending 

immediately before January 1, 2025. 

DATES: The dollar amounts are adjusted 

on April 1, 2025. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary 

D. Streeting, Senior Attorney, Judicial 

Services Office, Administrative Office of 

the United States Courts, Thurgood 

Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, 

One Columbus Circle NE, Room 4–270, 

Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 

502–1800, or by email at Judicial_

Services_Office@ao.uscourts.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

104 of title 11, United States Code, 

provides for an automatic three-year 

adjustment of dollar amounts in certain 

sections of titles 11 and 28. Notice is 

hereby given, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 

104(b), that the next such adjustment 

will occur on April 1, 2025. Effective on 

that date, the dollar amounts in effect 

under sections 101(3), 101(18), 

101(19A), 101(51D), 109(e), 303(b), 

507(a), 522(d), 522(f)(3), 522(f)(4), 

522(n), 522(p), 522(q), 523(a)(2)(C), 

541(b), 547(c)(9), 707(b), 1182(1), 

1322(d), 1325(b), and 1326(b)(3) of title 

11, and section 1409(b) of title 28, 

United States Code, are adjusted as set 

forth in the chart below to reflect the 

change in the Consumer Price Index for 

All Urban Consumers, published by the 

Department of Labor, for the 3-year 

period ending immediately before 

January 1, 2025, rounded to the nearest 

$25. This adjustment does not apply 

with respect to cases commenced before 

April 1, 2025. Seven Official 

Bankruptcy Forms (106C, 107, 122A–2, 

122C–2, 201, 207, and 410) and two 

Director’s Forms (2000 and 2830) will 

also be amended to reflect these 

adjusted dollar amounts. 

(Authority: 11 U.S.C. 104.) 

Dated: January 30, 2025. 

Joseph T. Phillips, 

Chief, Judicial Services Office. 

Affected sections of Titles 11 and 28 U.S.C. Dollar amount to be adjusted New (adjusted) dollar amount 1

11 U.S.C.: 

Section 101(3) ............................................ $226,850 .......................................................... $256,800. 

Section 101(18) .......................................... $11,097,350 (each time it appears) ................. $12,562,250 (each time it appears). 

Section 101(19A) ........................................ $2,268,550 (each time it appears) ................... $2,568,000 (each time it appears). 

Section 101(51D) ........................................ $3,024,725 (each time it appears) ................... $3,424,000 (each time it appears). 

Section 109(e) ............................................ $465,275 (each time it appears) ...................... $526,700 (each time it appears). 

$1,395,875 (each time it appears) ................... $1,580,125 (each time it appears). 

Section 303(b) ............................................ $18,600 (each time it appears) ........................ $21,050 (each time it appears). 

Section 507(a) 

paragraph (4) ....................................... $15,150 ............................................................ $17,150.

paragraph (5)(B)(i) ............................... $15,150 ............................................................ $17,150. 

paragraph (6) ....................................... $7,475 .............................................................. $8,450.

paragraph (7) ....................................... $3,350 .............................................................. $3,800.

Section 522(d) 

paragraph (1) ....................................... $27,900 ............................................................ $31,575.

paragraph (2) ....................................... $4,450 .............................................................. $5,025.

paragraph (3) ....................................... $700 .................................................................

$14,875 ............................................................

$800. 

$16,850. 

paragraph (4) ....................................... $1,875 .............................................................. $2,125.

paragraph (5) ....................................... $1,475 ..............................................................

$13,950 ............................................................

$1,675. 

$15,800. 

paragraph (6) ....................................... $2,800 .............................................................. $3,175.

paragraph (8) ....................................... $14,875 ............................................................ $16,850.

paragraph (11)(D) ................................ $27,900 ............................................................ $31,575. 

Section 522(f)(3) ......................................... $7,575 .............................................................. $8,575. 

Section 522(f)(4) ......................................... $800 (each time it appears) ............................. $900 (each time it appears). 

Section 522(n) ............................................ $1,512,350 ....................................................... $1,711,975. 

Section 522(p) ............................................ $189,050 .......................................................... $214,000. 

Section 522(q) ............................................ $189,050 .......................................................... $214,000. 

Section 523(a)(2)(C) 

paragraph (i)(I) ..................................... $800 ................................................................. $900.

paragraph (i)(II) .................................... $1,100 .............................................................. $1,250. 

Section 541(b) ............................................ $7,575 (each time it appears) .......................... $8,575 (each time it appears). 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1