alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,278
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  592,687<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,205<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                     32,133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               695,970
<PP&E>                                       1,814,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                 694,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,160,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          357,156
<BONDS>                                        878,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,028
<OTHER-SE>                                     765,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,160,511
<SALES>                                      2,812,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,822,940
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,633,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,882)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (25,936)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,660)
<CHANGES>                                      (4,415)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,021)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES $24,184 OF LONG-TERM NOTES RECEIVABLE.
<F2>EXCLUDES $2,921 OF ALLOWANCE FOR LONG-TERM NOTES RECEIVABLE.
<F3>INCLUDED IN TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES LINE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
BOCA STEL 2, LLC, Appellant, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Lillian McCarron, Martin Federal Credit Union, Woodland Lakes II Home Owners Association, Inc., Woodland Lakes Property Owners' Association, Inc., et al, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2035

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 18, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.79


                             TERMINATION AGREEMENT

        This Termination Agreement is made as of July 3, 1997, between DMX,
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("DMX"), and DMX-Europe N.V., a Netherlands
corporation ("DMX-NV"). 

        WHEREAS, DMX and DMX-NV entered into the Technology License and
Services Agreement dated May 19, 1993 (the "Technology Agreement");

        NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

        1.      The Technology Agreement is terminated by mutual agreement of
DMX and DMX-NV pursuant to Section 17.2(a) of the Technology Agreement.

        2.      Each of DMX and DMX-NV mutually release the other from any
obligation or liability under the Technology Agreement.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this
Termination Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

                                        DMX Inc.,
                                        a Delaware corporation

        
                                        By /s/ JOANNE WENDY KIM
                                          ------------------------------
                                           Its 
                                              --------------------------

                                        DMX-Europe N.V.,
                                        a Netherlands corporation

                                        By /s/ LANCE THOMAS
                                          ------------------------------
                                           Its SOLE DIRECTOR
                                              --------------------------

                                        DMX-Europe (UK) Limited,
                                        a United Kingdom Company

                                        By /s/ LANCE THOMAS
                                          ------------------------------
                                           Its SOLE DIRECTOR
                                              --------------------------
_______________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Case No. 2:17-00184-WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDERSON 

+ WANCA

3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500

Rolling Meadows, IL 60008

(847)368-1500

ROBERT C. SCHUBERT S.B.N. 62684

WILLEM F. JONCKHEER S.B.N. 178748

SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 788-4220

Facsimile: (415) 788-0161

rschubert@schubertlawfirm.com

wjonckheer@schubertlawfirm.com

Local Counsel for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class

BRIAN J. WANCA

RYAN M. KELLY

ROSS M. GOOD

ANDERSON & WANCA

3701 Algonquin Road, Ste 500

Rolling Meadows, IL 60008

Telephone: (847)368-1500

Facsimile: (847)368-1501

bwanca@andersonwanca.com

rkelly@andersonwanca.com

rgood@andersonwanca.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN C. ETTER, individually and as the 

representative of a class of similarlysituated persons,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00184-WHA

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO ORDER 

TO SHOW CAUSE

Complaint filed: January 13, 2017

Courtroom: 8, 19th Floor

District Judge: Hon. William H. Alsup

Trial date: June 4, 2018

Case 3:17-cv-00184-WHA Document 117 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 2
_______________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Case No. 2:17-00184-WHA

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANDERSON 

+ WANCA

3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500

Rolling Meadows, IL 60008

(847)368-1500

Plaintiff, John C. Etter, hereby responds to this Court’s Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 116) 

as follows:

1. Pursuant to this Court’s order of February 28, 2018 (Dkt. No. 114), On March 12, 

2018, Plaintiff produced all recorded calls from January 2016 to October 10, 2016, except for those 

calls subject to attorney-client privilege for which Plaintiff provided the requisite privilege log.

2. As Plaintiff has complied with the Court’s order and produced said records, Plaintiff 

believes that the third-party subpoena for records served by Allstate on SITA Laboratories dba 

Callcap should be withdrawn and Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Allstate’s Subpoena to Callcap (Dkt. 

No. 98) then be denied as moot.

Dated: March 29, 2018 ANDERSON + WANCA

/s/ Ryan M. Kelly

RYAN M. KELLY (admitted pro hac vice)

BRIAN J. WANCA

ROSS M. GOOD

Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOHN C. ETTER

Case 3:17-cv-00184-WHA Document 117 Filed 03/29/18 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 94-7349
ANTHONY COHEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; WILLIAM SMITH; UNKNOWN AGENT #1; CASE MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR; GEORGE C. SHANINAW, CCMS II; C. VINCENT, CCMS I; MARION TUTHILL, Vest #25; R. NOTTO, C.O. I, Vest #48, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge; Clarence E. Goetz, Chief Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-1049-WN, CA-93- 3318-WN) Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: January 29, 1996 Before HALL, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Cohen, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2* The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993). 3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying Appellant's motion for a new trial. * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Cohen v. Smith, Nos. CA-92-1049-WN; CA-93-3318-WN (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
A.A. v. K.F.W. and J.A.W.

2160989

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 21, 2018

Dismissed.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Steven L. Sunyich, certify that:





1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc.;





2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  May 16, 2011





/s/  Steven L. SunyichSteven L. Sunyich, CEO
DAVID MOORE DRYWALL INC., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3952

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

Arthur I. Jacobs, Richard J. Scholtz, and Douglas A. Wyler of Jacobs Scholz & Wyler, LLC, Fernandina Beach, for Appellant.

Samuel Gilot, Senior Attorney, and Dustin William Metz, Executive Senior Attorney, Department of Financial Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . *Aleong v. State, Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation* , 963 So.2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ; *Cann v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs.* , 813 So.2d 237 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SLM Holdings, Inc. (the "Registrant")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2007,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly  Report"),
I, Jason Bishara, Executive Chairman of the Registrant,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

          (1) The  Quarterly  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
     of the Registrant.


                                        By: /s/ Jason Bishara
Date: June 22, 2007                     ----------------------------------------
                                           Executive Chairman
                                           (Principal executive officer and
                                            principal financial officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

# AGENCY:

Office on Violence Against Women, United States Department of Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice; cancellation of meeting.

                    The Office on Violence Against Women (OVW), U.S. Department of                           ( print page 9045)                        Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     concerning a meeting of the Task Force on Research on Violence Against American Indian and Alaska Native Women (hereinafter “the Task Force”). The meeting, scheduled for Monday, February 10, 2025 at 1:00 p.m. has been cancelled and will be rescheduled for a later date. The notice is in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Friday, January 17, 2025 in FR Document Number 2025-01107 at 90 FR 6012.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Contact Sherriann C. Moore, Deputy Director, Tribal Affairs Division, Office on Violence Against Women, United States Department of Justice, at (202) 616-0039 or                         *ovw.tribalaffairs@usdoj.gov.*                         More information on the Task Force may be found at                         *https://www.justice.gov/​ovw/​section-904-task-force*                         and about the NIJ program of research at:                         *https://nij.ojp.gov/​topics/​tribal-crime-and-justice.*

Virginia Baran,

Supervisory Official, Deputy Director for Grants Development and Management, Office on Violence Against Women.

[FR Doc. 2025-02229 Filed 2-4-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-FX-P
Retention Bonus Agmt- NYCB, Roslyn Bancorp, Roslyn Savings Bank, John Bransfield



 EXHIBIT 10.8 
  
 New York Community Bancorp, Inc. 
 615
Merrick Avenue 
 Westbury, New York 11590 
  

June 27, 2003 
  
 John R. Bransfield, Jr. 
 The Roslyn Savings Bank 
 One Jericho Plaza 
 Jericho, New York 11753-8905 
  
 Dear John: 
  
 I am pleased to have this opportunity to set forth in writing certain additional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and New York Community Bank (the “Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered between the Holding
Company and Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the Holding Company. 
  
 At such time as you become an employee of the Holding Company and the Bank under your new employment agreement as a result of the merger contemplated by
the Merger Agreement, you will receive a retention bonus of $1,000,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employment after the Effective Time other than by reason of an “Event of
Termination” (as defined in your new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-day period, you will immediately return to the Holding Company a
portion of the retention bonus equal to the product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period and the denominator of which is 365. 







 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the Merger
Agreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 
  
 Please
acknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 
  

	 Sincerely,

	
	 /s/ Joseph R. Ficalora


	 Joseph R. Ficalora
 President and Chief Executive Officer



  

	 Acknowledged and Agreed:

	
	 /s/ John R. Bransfield, Jr.


	 John R. Bransfield, Jr.


  
  

 2
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Northern District of California

On behalf of Parkridge Limited et al.

Indyzen, Inc., et al.

4:16-cv-07387-KAW

Adam Wolek, 6301207

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

111 E Wacker Dr Ste 2800

Chicago, IL 60601

awolek@taftlaw.com

(312) 836-4063

(312) 527-4011

a limited capacity to challenge personal jurisdiction, the court’s jurisdiction and process for ostensible counterdefendants Randy Dobson, California Fitness and Yoga Centers, F8 Vietnam Company, and Boon Global Limited

December 21, 2017 s/ Adam Wolek

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 35 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 1
STATE of Louisiana v. Maurice ANDERSON

No. 2018-KH-1168

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction *1209burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 4, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02190]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ODVA, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 8, 2025, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ODVA, Inc. (``ODVA'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Aerotech, Inc., 
Pittsburgh, PA; JVL A/S, Birker[oslash]d, KINGDOM OF DENMARK; Simco 
(Nederland) B.V., Lochem, Gelderland, NETHERLANDS; Fortinet, Inc., 
Sunnyvale, CA; Shenzhen Blue Dynamics Precision Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, 
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; NITTOKU CO., LTD., Saitama, JAPAN; and 
MicroVision, Inc., Redmond, WA, have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    Also, Nanjing Decowell Automation Co., Ltd., Nanjing, PEOPLE'S 
REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Beijing Tianma Intelligent Control Technology Co., 
Ltd., Beijing, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Hanwha Corporation, Seoul, 
REPUBLIC OF KOREA; and Perinet GmbH, Berlin, GERMANY, have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 
15, 1996 (61 FR 6039).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 18, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 24, 2025 (90 FR 8143).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-02190 Filed 2-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```
Steven A. SPEAR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0348

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.