alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


              AMENDMENT #2 TO THE SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
                      DIRECTORS' DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


         WHEREAS, Sensient Technologies Corporation (the "Company") adopted the
Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") to assist the Company in
attracting and retaining the service of directors upon whose judgment, interest
and special effort the successful conduct of its operations largely depends; and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended in the manner set forth below:

         1. The phrase "Restated Plan" is deleted from the Plan wherever it
appears, and replaced in each case by the word "Plan."

         2. Section 6 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
following paragraph:

                  6. Crediting Stock to Stock Subaccount. If, pursuant to an
         Initial Election or Subsequent Election, an Eligible Director makes a
         Plan Allocation into the Stock Subaccount, such Eligible Director's
         Stock Subaccount shall be credited with that number of shares
         (including any fractional share) of the Company's common stock, $.10
         par value (including the associated Preferred Share Purchase Rights)
         ("Common Stock") which have a market value equal to the amount of the
         Deferral Portion allocated to his/her Stock Account. Shares shall be
         credited to a Stock Subaccount as of the last day of the fiscal quarter
         in which any Director Fees would have been payable (the "Credit Date").
         For purposes of this section 6, the market value of a share of Common
         Stock shall equal the closing sale price of a share of Common Stock on
         the New York Stock Exchange on the Credit Date (or if no sale took
         place on such exchange on such date, the closing sale price on such
         exchange on the most recent preceding date on which a sale took place).



         This amendment #2 to the Plan is hereby adopted and shall become
effective as of July 17, 2003.

                                        SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION


                                        By:  /s/ Richard Carney
                                           ----------------------------
                                        Richard Carney,
                                        Vice President, Administration




                                      -14-
STATE of Louisiana v. Taylor James WILLIAMS

No. 2019-KP-0224

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In addition, applicant's sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172. As to his remaining claim, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

WEIMER, J., recused.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART HUAWEI'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART HUAWEI'S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1353

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Huawei’s motion to seal as 

follows. By Tuesday, January 22, 2019, at 12:00 p.m., Huawei shall refile a redacted public 

version of the below document consistent with the Court’s sealing rulings.

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

Ding Deposition 124:18-19 GRANTED.

Ding Deposition 124:22-25 GRANTED.

Ding Deposition 125:7-12 GRANTED.

Ding Deposition 126:14-17 GRANTED.

Ding Deposition 126:21-22 DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1363 Filed 01/18/19 Page 1 of 1
CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC.                                       FINANCIAL CONTROL

12855 N. OUTER FORTY DRIVE
MS 822
ST. LOUIS, MO 63141


As of and for the year ended  December 31,  1997,  Citicorp  Mortgage,  Inc. (an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citicorp) and subsidiaries (the Company) has
complied,  in all material  respects  with the minimum  servicing  standards set
forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers   Association  of  America's   UNIFORM  SINGLE
ATTESTATION FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this same period,  the Company
had in effect  fidelity bond and errors and omissions  policies in the amount of
$274 million.

Very truly yours,




CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC.


By:  /s/  David B. Lowman
              David B. Lowman, Managing Director-
              Mortgage Services

By  /s/  Jim B. Levites           3-4-98
            Jim B. Levites, Managing Director-
            Default Management

By  /s/  Richard G. Thornberry     3-9-98
             Richard G. Thornberry President/Chief Operating Officer

By /s/  Carl Levinson
           Carl L. Levinson, Chairman/Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 1998
**EXHIBIT 23.3**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-203294 on Form S-3 of Vornado Realty L.P. of our report dated March 26, 2015 relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Toys “R” Us, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for each of the two fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2015 and the related financial statement schedule, incorporated by reference in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vornado Realty L.P.  for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

New York, New York

April 11, 2016
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.                                                              /s/ Stephen J. Boyle   Name:  Stephen J. Boyle   Title:  Chief Financial Officer   Date: November 9, 2005Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to TD Banknorth Inc. and will be retained by TD Banknorth Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MICHAEL AND CATHERINE 

HENRY,

Appellants,

v.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2479

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

William A. Wilkes, Judge.

Thomas R. Pycraft, Jr., Michael Joseph Pelkowski, and John J. Spence, St. 

Augustine, for Appellants.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the brief and record in this case without the benefit of an 

answer brief1 but find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

1 No answer brief or motion was filed on behalf of Appellee even though the Clerk 

contacted the law firms that represented Appellee below and extended the time to 

file an answer.

 
ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

2
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TriView Capital Management, Inc. as managing member of TriView Global Fund,
LLC, certify that (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011of
TriView Global Fund, LLC fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of TriView Global Fund, LLC.

TRIVIEW GLOBAL FUND, LLC
By:	TriView Capital Management, Inc., Managing Member


By:	/s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer

Date:	November 14, 2011

<page>
Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 24 PageID 1
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 24 PageID 2
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 3 of 24 PageID 3
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 4 of 24 PageID 4
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 5 of 24 PageID 5
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 6 of 24 PageID 6
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 7 of 24 PageID 7
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 8 of 24 PageID 8
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 9 of 24 PageID 9
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 10 of 24 PageID 10
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 11 of 24 PageID 11
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 12 of 24 PageID 12
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 13 of 24 PageID 13
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 14 of 24 PageID 14
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 15 of 24 PageID 15
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 16 of 24 PageID 16
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 17 of 24 PageID 17
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 18 of 24 PageID 18
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 19 of 24 PageID 19
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 20 of 24 PageID 20
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 21 of 24 PageID 21
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 22 of 24 PageID 22
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 23 of 24 PageID 23
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 1 Filed 02/06/06 Page 24 of 24 PageID 24
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 21 (Monday, February 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8815-8816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 16, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Copy Control 
Association (``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Panasonic Automotive Systems, Co., Ltd., 
Yokohama, JAPAN, has been added as a party to this venture.
    Also, Almedio Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN; Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd., Seoul, 
SOUTH KOREA; Sharp North Malaysia Sdn Bhd, Sungai Petani-Kedah, 
MALAYSIA; and Toyo Recording Co., Ltd., Tokyo, JAPAN, have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 24, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal

[[Page 8816]]

Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2024 (89 FR 
52094).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-02107 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
V.I. Technologies, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Forms
S-8 (No. 333-62925, No.333-62927, and No. 333-58601) of V.I. Technologies, Inc.
of our report dated January 15, 1999 relating to the balance sheets of V.I.
Technologies, Inc. as of January 2, 1999 and December 31, 1997, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended January 2, 1999, which report appears in
the January 2, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of V.I. Technologies, Inc.


                                                /s/  KPMG LLP



Melville, New York
March 31, 1999
##### 



Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc. (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies that: Based on my knowledge,



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Steven W. Surbaugh

Steven W. SurbaughChief Financial OfficerMarch 27, 2003


28
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FINJAN, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF 

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO 

SUBMIT STIPULATED PROPOSED 

REDACTIONS TO THE COURT'S 

ORDER OF APRIL 17, 2020 ON OR 

BEFORE APRIL 24, 2020

On April 17, 2020, the Court issued and conditionally sealed its Order on Daubert Motions. 

See ECF 549. The Order references materials that were filed under seal in this case. To give the 

parties an opportunity to request redactions to the Order, the Court directs the parties to submit a 

stipulated request for redactions (or indicate that no redactions are requested) on or before April 

24, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 17, 2020

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 550 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 3.1
 RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 THE A CONSULTING TEAM, INC.




---



##### 



Exhibit 3.1
 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 THE A CONSULTING TEAM, INC.
         Common Stock
   2




---



##### 



Exhibit 3.1
   Preferred Stock
      3




---



##### 



Exhibit 3.1
         4




---



##### 



Exhibit 3.1
        5




---



##### 



Exhibit 3.1
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF th
 THE A CONSULTING TEAM, INC.By:
    /s/ Shmuel BenTovName:
    Shmuel BenTovTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer andPresident
Order entered July 1 1 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00661 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF C .E.C. , A CHILD On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417 - 52684 - 2012



### O RDER W e GRANT court reporter Kathy Bounds’s July 7, 2014 request for extension of time to file the record and ORDER the record be filed no later than July 17, 2014
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Mark Joel FASSY, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, successor by merger to the Bank of New York as Successor in Interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank NA as Trustee for Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc., Bear Stearns Alt-A Trust 2005-9, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-9, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1548

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 5, 2019]

Mysha F. Browning and Kendrick Almaguer of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

Brandi Wilson of DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Conner, J.

Mark Joel Fassy ("the Borrower") appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for attorney's fees and costs after he successfully obtained an involuntary dismissal of the Bank of New York Mellon's ("the Bank") mortgage foreclosure complaint. The case proceeded to a nonjury trial. After the Bank presented its evidence, the Borrower moved for involuntary dismissal, arguing a lack of standing at the time suit was filed. The trial court entered a written order granting the motion, simply stating that the "case is involuntarily dismissed." However, it is clear from the portion of the trial transcript addressing the motion for involuntary dismissal that the trial court agreed with the Borrower's arguments that the Bank failed to prove standing at the time suit was filed.

After the trial court dismissed the case, the Borrower moved to tax costs and attorney's fees. The trial court entered an *53order denying both the motion for fees and the motion for costs. We affirm the denial of the fee motion without discussion. We reverse the denial of the motion for costs.

We reject the Bank's argument that the Borrower's arguments on appeal regarding costs are not preserved. The Borrower's motion specifically referenced Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420 (albeit in the context of trying to obtain an award of attorney's fees as an element of costs).

Rule 1.420(d) clearly provides that "[c]osts in any action dismissed under this rule *shall* be assessed and judgment for costs entered in that action, once the action is concluded as to the party seeking taxation of costs." Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(d) (emphasis added). In the instant case, the record is clear that the trial court granted an involuntary dismissal under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(b) after the Bank completed its presentation of evidence in a nonjury trial. "Because the case was involuntarily dismissed, the homeowner is entitled to taxable costs [under rule 1.420(d) ]." *Torres v. Bank of N.Y.* , 252 So. 3d 274, 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). Similar to the situation in *Torres* , "any costs awardable to the homeowner flow from rule 1.420 and not from the subject mortgage and/or note." *Id.*

We affirm the trial court's denial of the motion for attorney's fees. We reverse the trial court's denial of the motion for costs and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.*

Gerber, C.J., and May, J., concur.
# L_2017029EN.01001901.xml

| 3.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 29/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 29/19

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/184

of 1 February 2017

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 26 January 2017, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entry from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 26 January 2017, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entry from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 2017.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Acting Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, the following entry is deleted:

| ‘13. | AMANAT AL-ASIMA. Address: P.O. Box 11151, Masarif, near Baghdad Muhafadha, Al-Kishia, Baghdad, Iraq.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘13.

---