alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James T. House, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tarpon Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
1

 

the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 23, 2005                                                                               /s/ James T. House   James T. House, Senior Vice   President and Chief FinancialOfficer   
2
EXHIBIT 3 

REDACTED 

PUBLIC VERSION

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 256-7 Filed 01/04/19 Page 1 of 4
Exhibit 6 

To Declaration of Kevin H. Moriarty in Support of 

Motion by the Federal Trade Commission to 

Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Patrick Schaumont

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 256-7 Filed 01/04/19 Page 2 of 4
From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Hans and D-Link Corp Team, 

William Brown <william.brown@dlink.com > on behalf of William Brown 

Monday, April 13, 2015 12:22 PM 

Hans Liu;Shinglin Chung;Daniel Hsu;Robert Lin 

Ping Chen;Richard.RC Chen;AJ Wang;Osbert Ong 

Re: New D Link backdoor 

compose unknown contact jpg 

I can appreciate the challenges and complexities between D-Link Corp. and it's suppliers for many years. 

The global OBUs must trust and hold D-Link Corporation accountable too not create product liabilities for us in region. 

Regardless, whatever causes, prevents, or solves these 

[cid:part1.03040500.07030809@dlink.com] 

Hans Liu<mailto:Hans.Liu@dlinkcorp.com> 

April 10, 2015 at 7:58 PM 

Sir, 

Apparently it has nothing to do with HNAP itself but more like a security careless of Alpha's implementation. 

I reason why I don't call it a security hole directly is because, with all the respects, I really don't believe there is anyway 

we can prevent this kind of hacking. The level is different between our Programmer and the hacker, and as he 

mentioned he was finding something for "entertainment". And we don't blame anyone since even apple or google stuff 

are being hacked sometimes. 

However, there are two things we should do and we really "have to do". 

First, we sincerely should NOT have telnet daemon anymore and we should NOT use tftp. Manufacturing calibration can 

be done by our own sock programming. Leaving ftpd or tftpd or telentd is making troubles to ourselves. 

Second, we shall stop using http 1.1 basic authentication anymore. I have no idea why such a newest router still support 

that authentication. For the entire HNAP thing starting from the new UI, we already go with the new digest 

authentication. So does QRS Mobile. There is NO way we shall keep this insecure http basic authentication. (OCH-Series 

supports no basic auth since day one.) 

For IPCam and the other products, same thing should be applied. Stop using the http basic authentication. For IPCam 

that support HNAP for mydlink Home or for a support to coming new WebUI, they already support our new 

authentication just like the routers. 

CON Fl DENTIAL DLS0049144 

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 256-7 Filed 01/04/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 256-7 Filed 01/04/19 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 3, 2006
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Matthew T. Gibbs II             
|                       |  | Matthew T. Gibbs II                 
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer and Director
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 26 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer the catafalque which is situ4 ated in the Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center 

5 to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such catafalque may 

6 be used in connection with services to be conducted there 

7 for the Honorable Harry Mason Reid, Jr., a Senator from 

8 the State of Nevada. 

Passed the Senate January 5, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 26 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in 

the State of Nevada. orable Harry Mason Reid, Jr., a Senator from ducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the Honin connection with memorial services to be conthe Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center
EX PARTE Darryl SWINT

CR-17-0371

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.37



   List of Contents of Exhibits and Schedules to the Stock Purchase Agreement



           Exhibits                         Description
           --------                         -----------

Exhibit A                           Assignment and Assumption Agreement


          Schedules                         Description
          ---------                         -----------

Schedule 3.8                        Tax
James RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1830

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla H. McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*1169James Rodriguez appeals from a judgment and sentence following a jury trial in which he was found guilty of trafficking in cocaine. On appeal, Rodriguez asserts that the trial court committed reversible error in overruling his objections to certain statements made by the State in its rebuttal closing argument. A trial court's rulings on comments made during closing argument are generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion. *Braddy v. State*, 111 So.3d 810 (Fla. 2012). However, if the trial court overruled the defense's contemporaneous objections, and we determine that the comments were indeed improper, we apply a harmless error standard of review. *Snelgrove v. State*, 921 So.2d 560, 568 (Fla. 2005). This standard places "the burden on the state, as the beneficiary of the error, to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict or, alternatively stated, that there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction." *Ibar v. State*, 938 So.2d 451, 466 (Fla. 2006) (quoting *State v. DiGuilio*, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 (Fla. 1986) ).

Upon our review of the record, including a review of the closing arguments made by the State and the defense, we conclude that most of the complained-of comments were not improper and were in fair reply to defense counsel's closing argument. *See, e.g.*, *Williams v. State*, 225 So.3d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). To the extent that any of the State's comments were improper and objections were erroneously overruled by the trial court, we conclude any such error was harmless.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ACA Capital Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward U. Gilpin, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 14, 2007 |   |                         |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                  |   |                         |
|                  |   | /s/ Edward U. Gilpin         |
|                  |   | Edward U. Gilpin             |
|                  |   | Executive Vice President and |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

 

1

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

s1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139653

FREDERICK HAMILTON, Plaintiff,

v SC: 139653 AGC: 1088/09 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested
relief.
EXHIBIT 23 TO FORM 10-KSB

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Four Oaks Fincorp,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos.  333-30677 and 333-69792) and
Form S-3 (File No.  333-33527)  of our report dated  February  24, 2004,  on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. as of
December  31, 2003 and for the year ended  December  31,  2003,  which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.



/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC

Sanford, North Carolina
March 24, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

To the Stockholder of DBT Online, Inc. and subsidiaries:

We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows of DBT Online, Inc. and subsidiaries ("DBT
Online") for the year ended December 31, 1999 (not presented separately herein).
Our audit also included DBT Online's financial statement schedule for the year
ended December 31, 1999 (not presented separately herein). These financial
statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of DBT
Online's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit. The
consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the merger of DBT
Online and I.R.S.C., Inc. and subsidiaries ("IRSC"), which has been accounted
for as a pooling of interests as described in Note 3 to such consolidated
financial statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and the cash flows
of DBT Online, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1999, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, present fairly, in all material respects the information set forth
therein.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 6, 2000


                                       26
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\UNIONAMERICA V. FORT MILLER\ORDER ON 

REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM.wpd 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO.,

LIMITED, Successor-ininterest to ST. PAUL

REINSURANCE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.,

THE FORT MILLER CO. and

BEECHE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C05-1912 BZ

ORDER ON REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM

On October 30, 2008, I severed the counterclaim and

ordered the trial to proceed on Unionamerica’s claims. At the

pretrial conference, Fort Miller questioned whether that

included the reimbursement claim. Having read both parties’

supplemental briefs , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

Unionamerica’s reimbursement claim will be tried next week.

Dated: February 19, 2009

 

 Bernard Zimmerman

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 332 Filed 02/19/09 Page 1 of 1
Gregory J. BATIZI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2172

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed April 12, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

We affirm this *Anders*1 appeal in all respects. However, we note that the judgment contains a scrivener's error where it states that Appellant's sex offender probation for count nine is for a period of eight years following the prison term. This conflicts with the oral pronouncement that the sentence for count nine (a third-degree felony) was two years of prison followed by three years of sex offender probation. Thus, we remand this case for correction of the scrivener's error on the judgment and sentence. *See, e.g.*, *Downey v. State*, 114 So.3d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (affirming an *Anders* appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener's errors).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

LAMBERT, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.

1

*Anders v. California*, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 1 of 18 PageID 381
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 2 of 18 PageID 382
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 3 of 18 PageID 383
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 4 of 18 PageID 384
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 5 of 18 PageID 385
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 6 of 18 PageID 386
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 7 of 18 PageID 387
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 8 of 18 PageID 388
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 9 of 18 PageID 389
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 10 of 18 PageID 390
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 11 of 18 PageID 391
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 12 of 18 PageID 392
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 13 of 18 PageID 393
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 14 of 18 PageID 394
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 15 of 18 PageID 395
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 16 of 18 PageID 396
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 17 of 18 PageID 397
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01913-M Document 22 Filed 06/19/06 Page 18 of 18 PageID 398
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices 

# Order

Ma y 1 , 2020

159660

- 1 ( 91 )

MAEGAN TURNER, by WALTER SAKOWSKI,

Conservator,

Plaintiff,

and

RIVERVIEW MACOMB HOME &

ATTENDANT CARE, LLC,

Intervening Plaintiff,

SC: 159660

v COA: 339624

Wayne CC: 16

- 002031

- NF

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Defendant/Cross

- Plaintiff/

Cross

- Defendant

- Appellee,

and

ENTERPRISE LEASING CORPORATION OF

DETROIT, LLC and EAN HOLDINGS, LLC,

Defendants/Cross

- Defendants

- Appell ants,

and

ESTATE OF JASON PUCKETT, by GARY

DUANE RUPP, Personal Representative,

Defendant/Cross

- Plaintiff,

and

PATSY VILLNEFF and TAMERA HARPER,

Defendants/Cross

- Defendants.

_________________________________________/I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ma y 1 , 2020 2

Clerk JONTE EVERSON,

Plaintiff,

SC: 159661

v COA: 339815

Washtenaw CC: 16

- 000359

- NF

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Defendant/Third

- Party

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY,

Third

- Party Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of PV Holding Corp . and Avis Budget

Group, Inc. to file a brief amicus curiae consistent with MCR 7.312(H)(3) and (4) is

GRANTED.
Eric Lavon JERKINS v. STATE

CR-17-0041

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Novelis Inc. (the Company),hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.            /s/ William T. Monahan         William T. Monahan    Interim Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)  Date:October 19, 2006     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andis not being filed as part of this report.