8140 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 15 / Friday, January 24, 2025 / Notices 

4See, e.g., 82 FR 4902 (Jan. 17, 2017); 69 FR 

48877 (Aug. 11, 2004); 67 FR 68924 (Nov. 13, 2002). 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

currently designated: (1) Aliens who did 

not arrive by sea, who are apprehended 

anywhere in the United States more 

than 100 air miles from a U.S. 

international land border, and who have 

been continuously present in the United 

States for less than two years; and (2) 

aliens who did not arrive by sea, who 

are apprehended within 100 air miles 

from a U.S. international land border, 

and who have been continuously 

present in the United States for at least 

14 days but for less than two years. Each 

alien placed in expedited removal under 

this designation bears the affirmative 

burden to show to the satisfaction of an 

immigration officer that the alien has 

been present in the United States 

continuously for the relevant period. 

This designation does not apply to 

aliens who arrive at U.S. ports of entry, 

because those aliens are already subject 

to expedited removal. Nor does this 

designation apply to or otherwise affect 

aliens who satisfy the expedited 

removal criteria set forth in any of the 

previous designations. See 82 FR 4902, 

69 FR 48877; 67 FR 68923. 

(C) With the exception of the March 

21, 2022 Notice rescinded above, this 

Notice does not supersede, abrogate, or 

amend or modify any of the Pre-2019 

Designations,4 which shall remain in 

full force and effect in accordance with 

their respective terms. 

Signed at Washington, DC. 

Benjamine C. Huffman, 

Acting Secretary of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01720 Filed 1–21–25; 4:45 pm] 

BILLING CODE 9110–9M–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–606 and 731– 

TA–1416 (Review)] 

Quartz Surface Products From China 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year reviews, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

countervailing duty and antidumping 

duty orders on quartz surface products 

from China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on June 3, 2024 (89 FR 47614) 

and determined on September 6, 2024 

that it would conduct expedited reviews 

(89 FR 97653, December 9, 2024). 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these reviews on January 17, 2025. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 5578 

(January 2025), entitled Quartz Surface 

Products from China: Investigation Nos. 

701–TA–606 and 731–TA–1416 

(Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 17, 2025. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01632 Filed 1–23–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1433] 

Certain Glass Substrates for Liquid 

Crystal Displays, Products Containing 

the Same, and Methods for 

Manufacturing the Same; Notice of 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 18, 2024, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Corning Incorporated, Corning, 

New York. A supplement to the 

Complaint was filed on January 7, 2025. 

The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain glass substrates 

for liquid crystal displays, products 

containing the same, and methods for 

manufacturing the same by reason of the 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,851,394 (‘‘the ’394 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 8,627,684 (‘‘the ’684 

patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 9,512,025 

(‘‘the ’025 patent’’). The complainant, as 

supplemented, also alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

and sale of certain glass substrates for 

liquid crystal displays, products 

containing the same, and methods for 

manufacturing the same by reason of 

misappropriation of trade secrets the 

threat or effect of which is to destroy or 

substantially injure a domestic industry. 

The complaint, as supplemented, 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. The 

complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order, or in the 

alternative a limited exclusion order, 

and cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 17, 2025, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine: 

(a) whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain products identified in paragraph 

(2) by reason of infringement of one or 

more of claims 1, 5, 6, and 8–10 of ’394 

patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 7, and 10–12 of 

the ’684 patent; and claims 15–20 of the 

’025 patent, and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES