Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP 

Robert A. Van Nest (SBN 84065) 

rvannest@keker.com 

Eugene M. Paige (SBN 202849) 

epaige@keker.com 

Justina Sessions (SBN 270914) 

jsessions@keker.com 

633 Battery Street 

San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 

Telephone: (415) 391-5400 

Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 

Gary A. Bornstein (pro hac vice) 

gbornstein@cravath.com 

Yonatan Even (pro hac vice)

yeven@cravath.com 

825 Eighth Avenue 

New York, New York 10019-7475 

Telephone: (212) 474-1000 

Facsimile: (212) 474-3700 

Attorneys for Defendant 

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

Richard S. Taffet (pro hac vice)

richard.taffet@morganlewis.com 

101 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10178-0060 

Telephone: (212) 309-6000 

Facsimile: (212) 309-6001 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

Willard K. Tom (pro hac vice)

willard.tom@morganlewis.com 

1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20004-2541 

Telephone: (202) 739-3000 

Facsimile: (202) 739-3001 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

Geoffrey T. Holtz (SBN 191370) 

gholtz@morganlewis.com 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1596 

Telephone: (415) 442-1000 

Facsimile: (415) 442-1001 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

DECLARATION OF GEOFFREY T. 

HOLTZ IN SUPPORT OF REVISED 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF 

DEFENDANT QUALCOMM’S 

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor 

Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 13
1 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

DECLARATION OF GEOFFREY T. HOLTZ 

I, Geoffrey T. Holtz, declare and state that: 

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California, a partner of 

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, and counsel of record for Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated 

(“Qualcomm”). I submit this declaration in support of Qualcomm Incorporated’s Revised 

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Defendant Qualcomm’s Proposed Findings 

Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law (“Proposed Findings”). I have personal knowledge of the facts 

set forth herein, or my knowledge is based upon my review of records of this case. If called upon 

as a witness in this action, I could and would testify competently thereto. 

2. Portions of Qualcomm’s Proposed Findings contain information that have been 

designated confidential by Qualcomm and/or third parties. I have been informed by Qualcomm 

and third parties that this information retains independent economic value from not being 

generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means to the general 

public. 

3. Specifically, Qualcomm’s Proposed Findings contains and references the 

following information designated by Qualcomm and third parties Apple, AT&T, Ericsson, 

Huawei, Intel, InterDigital, LG, Marvell, MediaTek, Motorola/Lenovo, Nokia, Panasonic, 

Samsung, Sony, Via Licensing, and ZTE as properly subject to sealing: 

Table 1: Proposed Redactions In Qualcomm’s Proposed Findings 

Requesting Party Citation Relevant Standard ¶ in Qualcomm or 3rd 

Party Decl ISO Sealing 

Qualcomm ¶ 036 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 21 

Qualcomm ¶ 037 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 17 

LGE ¶ 039 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 5, 7 

LGE ¶ 040 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

Samsung ¶ 040 Compelling Exh. 17 (Park) ¶ 5-6, 8-

10 

Qualcomm ¶ 040 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

LGE ¶ 042 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 5, 7 

Ericsson ¶ 048 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Qualcomm ¶ 059 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 21 

LGE ¶ 063 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 2 of 13
2 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Nokia ¶ 063 Compelling Exh. 15 (Koppelman) ¶ 

3-5 

Qualcomm ¶ 064 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 17 

Lenovo and 

Motorola ¶ 083 Compelling Exh. 10 (Blumberg) ¶ 6.a 

Qualcomm ¶ 084 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 14 

Qualcomm ¶ 085 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 20 

Qualcomm ¶ 086, Page 13, Line 

17 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 21 

Motorola ¶ 090 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.c 

Lenovo ¶ 092 Compelling Exh. 10 (Blumberg) ¶ 

6.b 

Qualcomm ¶ 092 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Lenovo ¶ 094 Compelling Exh. 10 (Blumberg) ¶ 

6.c 

Qualcomm ¶ 094, Lines 25-26 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15

Lenovo ¶ 096 Compelling Exh. 10 (Blumberg) ¶ 

6.d 

Lenovo ¶ 100 Compelling Exh. 10 (Blumberg) ¶ 

6.e 

Motorola ¶ 102 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.d 

Lenovo ¶ 103 Compelling Exh. 10 (Blumberg) ¶ 

6.f 

Qualcomm ¶ 103 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Motorola ¶ 106 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.e 

Motorola ¶ 107 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.f 

Motorola ¶ 108 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.g 

Qualcomm ¶ 110 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 111 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 115 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 117 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Blackberry ¶ 118 Compelling 

Request Granted in 

Blackberry Motion to 

Seal ECF No. 1113 

Huawei ¶ 123 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Huawei ¶ 125 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Huawei ¶ 127 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 127 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Huawei ¶ 130 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Huawei ¶ 132 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Huawei ¶ 133 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 3 of 13
3 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Huawei ¶ 136 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Huawei ¶ 137 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Huawei ¶ 138 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Huawei ¶ 140 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 140 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Huawei ¶ 141 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 141 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Huawei ¶ 142 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 142 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Huawei ¶ 143 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 143 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Huawei ¶ 144 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Nokia ¶ 150 Compelling Exh. 15 (Koppelman) ¶ 

3-5 

Qualcomm ¶ 150 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Nokia ¶ 153 Compelling Exh. 15 (Koppelman) ¶ 

3-5 

Qualcomm ¶ 153, Lines 15-17 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15

Nokia ¶ 154 Compelling Exh. 15 (Koppelman) ¶ 

3-5 

Qualcomm ¶ 154 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 156 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 157 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Sony ¶ 159 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 160 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 162 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Ericsson ¶ 164 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Sony ¶ 164 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Ericsson ¶ 165 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Sony ¶ 165 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Ericsson ¶ 166 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Sony ¶ 166 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 167 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Ericsson ¶ 167 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Ericsson ¶ 168 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Sony ¶ 168 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 172 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 173 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 174 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 175 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Qualcomm ¶ 176 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15; 

Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 14 

Sony ¶ 179 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 180 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 4 of 13
4 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Sony ¶ 181 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 182 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Qualcomm ¶ 182 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Sony ¶ 183 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Qualcomm ¶ 183 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Sony ¶ 184 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Sony ¶ 185 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

Panasonic ¶ 187 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 8 

and Addendum 

Panasonic ¶ 190 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 1 

and Addendum 

Panasonic ¶ 191 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 2 

and Addendum 

Qualcomm ¶ 193 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 194 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Panasonic ¶ 195 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 3 

and Addendum 

Qualcomm ¶ 195 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Panasonic ¶ 196 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 4 

and Addendum 

Qualcomm ¶ 196 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 198 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Panasonic ¶ 199 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 9 

and Addendum 

Qualcomm ¶ 199 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Panasonic ¶ 200 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 5 

and Addendum 

Qualcomm ¶ 200 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Panasonic ¶ 201 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 6 

and Addendum 

Qualcomm ¶ 201 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

ZTE ¶ 203 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 5 

Qualcomm ¶ 203 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

ZTE ¶ 204 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 5 

Qualcomm ¶ 204 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

ZTE ¶ 205 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 5 

ZTE ¶ 206 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 5 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 5 of 13
5 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

ZTE ¶ 208 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 5 

ZTE ¶ 209 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 6 

ZTE ¶ 210 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 6 

Qualcomm ¶ 210 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15; 

Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

ZTE ¶ 211 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 5 

Qualcomm ¶ 211 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

ZTE ¶ 212 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 5 

LGE ¶ 213 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 5, 7 

Qualcomm ¶ 214 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Samsung ¶ 214 Compelling Exh. 17 (Park) ¶ 5-6, 8-

10 

Qualcomm ¶ 216 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15, 

19 

Samsung ¶ 216 Compelling Exh. 17 (Park) ¶ 5-6, 8-

10 

Qualcomm ¶ 217 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 221 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15, 

19 

Samsung ¶ 221 Compelling Exh. 17 (Park) ¶ 5-6, 8-

10 

Qualcomm ¶ 222 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 19 

Qualcomm ¶ 223 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 225 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 19 

Samsung ¶ 225 Compelling Exh. 17 (Park) ¶ 5, 7, 8-

10 

Qualcomm ¶ 227 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

Samsung ¶ 227 Compelling Exh. 17 (Park) ¶ 5-6, 8-

10 

Qualcomm ¶ 228 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 20 

Samsung ¶ 228, Page 31 

(percentage values) Compelling Exh. 17 (Park) ¶ 5, 7, 8-10 

LGE ¶ 230 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4-5, 

7 

LGE ¶ 231 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

Qualcomm ¶ 231 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

LGE ¶ 234 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

LGE ¶ 235 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

Qualcomm ¶ 235, Lines 8-9 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 19, 

20; Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 18 

LGE ¶ 236 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

LGE ¶ 239 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

Qualcomm ¶ 239 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

LGE ¶ 241 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

MediaTek ¶ 258 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 6 of 13
6 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Motorola ¶ 258 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.h 

Intel ¶ 258 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) 

Paragraphs 8-10 

Qualcomm ¶ 259 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 18 

Qualcomm ¶ 260 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 18 

Qualcomm ¶ 262 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 18 

Qualcomm ¶ 263 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 18 

Qualcomm ¶ 264 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 18 

LGE ¶ 265 Compelling Exh. 11 (Eimer) ¶ 4, 7 

Panasonic ¶ 265 Compelling 

Exh. 16 (Iwabuchi) 

Declaration ¶ 4, Row 7 

and Addendum 

Sony ¶ 265 Compelling Exh. 18 (Hill) ¶ 5 

ZTE ¶ 265 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 6 

Qualcomm ¶ 265 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 18 

Qualcomm ¶ 266 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 18 

Motorola ¶ 267 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.i 

Qualcomm ¶ 307 Compelling Exh. 3 (Pankaj) ¶ 12 

Qualcomm ¶ 308 Compelling Exh. 3 (Pankaj) ¶ 14 

Nokia ¶ 371 Compelling Exh. 15 (Koppelman) ¶ 

3-5 

Ericsson ¶ 372 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Nokia ¶ 395 Compelling Exh. 15 (Koppelman) ¶ 

3-5 

Ericsson ¶ 395 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Nokia ¶ 396 Compelling Exh. 15 (Koppelman) ¶ 

3-5 

Ericsson ¶ 397 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Ericsson ¶ 398 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Huawei ¶ 398 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Interdigital ¶ 399 Compelling Exh. 9 (McElvaine) ¶ 6 

Intel ¶ 400 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 11 

Motorola ¶ 402 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.j 

MediaTek ¶ 405 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

MediaTek ¶ 406 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Marvell ¶ 407 Compelling 

Exh. 12 (EtienneCummings) Paragraphs 

7-9 

MediaTek ¶ 407 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Ericsson ¶ 407 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Apple ¶ 409 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 7 of 13
7 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Intel ¶ 410 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 11 

Via Licensing ¶ 410 Compelling Exh. 19 (Maghame) ¶ 4 

Huawei ¶ 410 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Apple ¶ 411 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Via Licensing ¶ 411 Compelling Exh. 19 (Maghame) ¶ 4 

MediaTek ¶ 412 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Interdigital ¶ 413 Compelling Exh. 9 (McElvaine) ¶ 6 

MediaTek ¶ 413 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Huawei ¶ 413 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Ericsson ¶ 414 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Qualcomm ¶ 425 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 17 

Qualcomm ¶ 426 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 17 

Samsung ¶ 427 Compelling Exh. 17 (Park) ¶ 5-6, 8-

10 

Qualcomm ¶ 427, Lines 7-11 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 20, 

22 

Qualcomm ¶ 429 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 21 

Apple ¶ 431 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 431 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) 

Paragraphs 8-10 

Apple ¶ 433 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 434 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 437 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 438(b) Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 438(d) Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 438(d) Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 438(f) Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 14 

Apple ¶ 440 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 440 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 441 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 441 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 442 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 442 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 443 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Ericsson ¶ 443 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Apple ¶ 444 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 444 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 445 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 445 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 446 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 446 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 448 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 448 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 449 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 8 of 13
8 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Qualcomm ¶ 449 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 451 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 451 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15, 18 

Apple ¶ 452 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 454 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 455 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 455 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 8-10 

Apple ¶ 456 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 457 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 458 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 458 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 8-10 

Apple ¶ 459 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Ericsson ¶ 459 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Apple ¶ 460 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 461 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 462 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 462 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 8-10 

Apple ¶ 463 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 463 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 8-10 

Apple ¶ 464 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 464 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 8-10 

Apple ¶ 465 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 466 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 467 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 468 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 468 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 5-7 

Intel ¶ 469 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 5-7 

Apple ¶ 470 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 470 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 5-7 

Motorola ¶ 493 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.k 

Motorola ¶ 495 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.l. 

Motorola ¶ 496 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.m 

Qualcomm ¶ 498 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

MediaTek ¶ 502 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Apple ¶ 503 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

MediaTek ¶ 503 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Intel ¶ 510 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 5-7 

Qualcomm ¶ 524 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Lenovo ¶ 525 Compelling Exh. 10 (Blumberg) ¶ 

6.g 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 9 of 13
9 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

Motorola ¶ 527 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.n 

Huawei ¶ 528 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Apple ¶ 530 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 532 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 534 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Apple ¶ 536 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

MediaTek ¶ 536 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Apple ¶ 537 (including 

chart) Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 538 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 14 

Apple ¶ 542 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Ericsson ¶ 542 Compelling Exh. 6 (Lucarelli) ¶ 7 

Marvell ¶ 543 Compelling Exh. 12 (EtienneCummings) ¶ 7-9 

ZTE ¶ 552 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 552 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 14 

Motorola ¶ 553 Compelling Exh. 14 (Madderom) ¶ 

6.o 

Qualcomm ¶ 553 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 554 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 14, 19 

Apple ¶ 555 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 557 Compelling Exh. 3 (Pankaj) ¶ 14 

MediaTek ¶ 566 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 571 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 15 

ZTE ¶ 571 Compelling Exh. 20 (Wood) ¶ 6 

Huawei ¶ 571 Compelling Exh. 7 (Geiszler) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 573 Compelling Exh. 3 (Pankaj) ¶ 15 

Qualcomm ¶ 606 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 19 

Qualcomm ¶ 620 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 19 

MediaTek ¶ 650 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Qualcomm ¶ 666 Compelling Exh. 1 (Gettinger) ¶ 23 

Apple ¶ 674 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Intel ¶ 674 Compelling Exh. 8 (Ford) ¶ 5-7 

MediaTek ¶ 676 Compelling Exh. 13 (Holtzman) ¶ 3 

Apple ¶ 702 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 702 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 703 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Qualcomm ¶ 703 Compelling Exh. 2 (Arner) ¶ 15 

Apple ¶ 704 Compelling Exh. 4 (Takashima) ¶ 4 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 10 of 13
10 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

4. Pursuant to the Court’s September 5, 2018 and December 7, 2018 orders, 

Qualcomm contacted all aforementioned third parties between December 5, 2018 and December 

7, 2018 to discuss the sealing of third-party confidential information. Qualcomm and the 

aforementioned third parties provided Qualcomm with declarations supporting their requests to 

seal portions of the Proposed Findings: 

a. Attached as Exhibit 1 to this declaration is the declaration of Matthew Gettinger, 

supporting Qualcomm’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under 

seal. 

b. Attached as Exhibit 2 to this declaration is the declaration of Zachary Arner, 

supporting Qualcomm’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under 

seal. 

c. Attached as Exhibit 3 to this declaration is the declaration of Rajesh Pankaj, 

supporting Qualcomm’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under 

seal. 

d. Attached as Exhibit 4 to this declaration is the declaration of Edward H. 

Takashima, supporting Apple’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings 

under seal. 

e. Attached as Exhibit 5 to this declaration is the declaration of Jana I. Seidl, 

supporting AT&T’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

f. Attached as Exhibit 6 to this declaration is the declaration of Andrew L. Lucarelli,

supporting Ericsson’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

g. Attached as Exhibit 7 to this declaration is the declaration of Steven M. Geiszler, 

supporting Huawei’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

h. Attached as Exhibit 8 to this declaration is the declaration of Mark Ford, 

supporting Intel’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

i. Attached as Exhibit 9 to this declaration is the declaration of Ranae McElvaine, 

supporting InterDigital’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under 

seal. 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 11 of 13
11 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

j. Attached as Exhibit 10 to this declaration is the declaration of Ira Blumberg, 

supporting Lenovo’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

k. Attached as Exhibit 11 to this declaration is the declaration of Nathan P. Eimer, 

supporting LG’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

l. Attached as Exhibit 12 to this declaration is the declaration of Shamita EtienneCummings, supporting Marvell’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings 

under seal. 

m. Attached as Exhibit 13 to this declaration is the declaration of Steven C. 

Holtzman, supporting MediaTek’s request to file portions of the Proposed 

Findings under seal. 

n. Attached as Exhibit 14 to this declaration is the declaration of Todd Madderom, 

supporting Motorola’s and Lenovo’s requests to file portions of the Proposed 

Findings under seal. 

o. Attached as Exhibit 15 to this declaration is the declaration of Ryan Koppelman, 

supporting Nokia’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

p. Attached as Exhibit 16 to this declaration is the declaration of Bradley S. Lui, 

which attaches the redacted declaration and addendum of Takemi Iwabuchi, 

supporting Panasonic’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under 

seal. Mr. Iwabuchi’s initial declaration in support of sealing is not attached. That 

declaration, which was to be publicly filed, contained quotes verbatim from 

Qualcomm's Findings of Fact, including the information Panasonic sought to be 

sealed. Upon notice that Qualcomm could not submit under seal Panasonic's 

declaration in support of sealing absent yet another motion to seal necessitating 

further declarations, Panasonic submitted a revised declaration on Monday, 

December 17. Counsel for Panasonic received a list of proposed redactions on 

December 6, 2018 and corresponding paragraph numbers on December 11. 

Counsel for Panasonic presented Qualcomm with Panasonic's initial sealing 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 12 of 13
12 Holtz Declaration ISO Admin. Motion to Seal 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

MORGAN, LEWIS &

BOCKIUS LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAN FRANCISCO

declaration on December 13. All references in the table above are to Mr. 

Iwabuchi’s redacted declaration and addendum. 

q. Attached as Exhibit 17 to this declaration is the declaration of Sanghoon Park, 

supporting Samsung’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

r. Attached as Exhibit 18 to this declaration is the declaration of Lee Hill, supporting

Sony’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

s. Attached as Exhibit 19 to this declaration is the declaration of Taraneh Maghame, 

supporting Via Licensing’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under 

seal. 

t. Attached as Exhibit 20 to this declaration is the declaration of James Ray Wood, 

supporting ZTE’s request to file portions of the Proposed Findings under seal. 

5. Based on the foregoing, Qualcomm has proposed redactions to its Proposed 

Findings and requests that the Court seal the unredacted Proposed Findings. Attached to this 

declaration is a version of Qualcomm’s Proposed Findings that contains the proposed redactions. 

6. I am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to make this 

filing. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the signatories of these 

documents have concurred in this filing. 

 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 

14th day of January, 2019 in San Jose, California. 

 /s/ Geoffrey T. Holtz 

Geoffrey T. Holtz 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1310-3 Filed 01/14/19 Page 13 of 13