Exhibit 29

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-10 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 5
· · · · · · · · · UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

· · · · · · · · ·NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

· · · · · · · · · · · · SAN JOSE DIVISION

· 

· · ·FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

· · · · · · · · Plaintiff,· · Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · CASE No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK

· · · · · · · · v.

· · ·QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a

· · ·Delaware corporation,

· 

· · · · · · · · Defendant.

· · ·_______________________________________________________

· · ·IN RE: QUALCOMM ANTITRUST

· · ·LITIGATION

· · ·_______________________________________________________

· · · ·*** HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY ***

· · · ·VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MICHAEL HARTOGS, VOLUME I

· · · · · · · · · · · SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

· · · · · · · · · · · · FEBRUARY 28, 2018

· 

· 

· · ·Reported By:

· · ·PATRICIA Y. SCHULER

· · ·CSR No. 11949

· · ·Job No. 655307

· 

· 

· 

· 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-10 Filed 11/28/18 Page 2 of 5
·1· ·

·2· ·

·3· · · · 

·4· 

·5· ·

·6· 

·7· 

·8· 

·9· 

10· · · · Q.· ·But Qualcomm requests that all licensees

11· ·cross license at least some patents back to Qualcomm;

12· ·is that right?

13· · · · A.· ·Yes.

14· · · · Q.· ·And why is that?

15· · · · A.· ·Qualcomm has a product business, and in

16· ·granting a license under -- our outbound licenses are

17· ·typically all of our patents.· If we grant someone a

18· ·license under all of your patents and then that company

19· ·turns around and sues you for patent infringement the

20· ·next day, you are in a position to defend yourself.

21· · · · · · ·So if a license results in us granting a

22· ·license under all of our patents, then we take the

23· ·license back to usually all of the patents of the

24· ·licensee for Qualcomm's products to assure that the QCT

25· ·business is free to operate without fear of

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-10 Filed 11/28/18 Page 3 of 5
·1· ·infringement claims by a licensee.

·2· · · ·

·3· 

·4· ·

·5· · · ·

·6· · · · 

·7· ·

·8· · · · 

·9· ·

10· 

11· 

12· · · · 

13· ·

14· ·

15· · · ·

16· 

17· ·

18· ·

19· ·

20· ·

21· ·

22· ·

23· · · · 

24· ·

25· · · · 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-10 Filed 11/28/18 Page 4 of 5
·1· · · · · · ·I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand

·2· ·Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify:

·3· · · · · · ·That the foregoing proceedings were taken

·4· ·before me at the time and place herein set forth; that

·5· ·any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to

·6· ·testifying, were duly sworn; that a verbatim record of

·7· ·the proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand

·8· ·which was thereafter transcribed under my direction;

·9· ·that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the

10· ·testimony given.

11· · · · · · ·Further, that if the foregoing pertains to

12· ·the original transcript of a deposition in a Federal

13· ·Case, before completion of the proceedings, review of

14· ·the transcript [X] was [ ] was not requested.

15· · · · · · ·I further certify I am neither financially

16· ·interested in the action nor a relative or employee of

17· ·any attorney of party to this action.

18· · · · · · ·IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date

19· ·subscribed my name.

20· ·Dated:· March 1, 2018

21

22· · · · · · · · · · · · · _________________________

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · PATRICIA Y. SCHULER

23· · · · · · · · · · · · · CSR NO. 11949

24

25

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-10 Filed 11/28/18 Page 5 of 5