alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# m8600.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22.9.2017 C(2017) 6552 final To the notifying part y Subject : Case M. 8600 – ARTSANA / PRENATAL RETAIL GROUP Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 30 August 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Artsana S.p.A. (' Artsana ', Italy), jointly controlled by Investindustrial Group (United Kingdom) and Catelli S.r.l . (Italy), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Prénatal Retail Group S.p.A. ('PRG', Italy), currently jointly controlled by Artsana and Giochi Preziosi S.p.A, by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Artsana : manufacture and supply of baby care products and health care products, as well as retail sale of baby care products through specialised stores; - for PRG: retail sale of baby care products and toys through the speciali s ed stores Prénatal , Bimbo Store, Toys Center and King Jouet . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( d ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
(signed)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 295 , 06 . 9 . 2017 , p. 6 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
# C_2016441EN.01003201.xml

| 28.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/32

---

Action brought on 7 October 2016 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinWärme)

(Case T-719/16)

(2016/C 441/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker and A. Schönfleisch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘berlinWärme’ — Application for registration No 14 062 558

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 July 2016 in Case R 618/2016-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Aaron ROGERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D19-784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 14, 2019

Aaron Rogers, Clermont, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed *1192with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the August 30, 2018 judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 2017-304677-CFDB, in the Circuit Court in and for Volusia County, Florida. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, WALLIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.6
                                                                   ------------



          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection  with the Form 40-F/A of  Abitibi-Consolidated  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the year ended  December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John W. Weaver,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


   By:  /s/ John W. Weaver
        -----------------------------------
        John W. Weaver
        President and Chief Executive Officer


June 7, 2007
Peter OBERMEYER, Appellant, v. BANK OF NEW YORK, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-1637

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Gregg Horowitz (Sarasota), for appellant.

DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, and Shawn Taylor (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Peter Obermeyer, who successfully obtained the dismissal of the foreclosure action filed against him by the Bank of New York, appeals the trial court's final judgment denying attorney's fees and costs for litigating the amount of attorney's fees. Based on our longstanding precedent, we affirm. *N. Dade Church of God, Inc. v. JM Statewide, Inc.*, 851 So.2d 194, 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) ("It is settled that in litigating over attorney's fees, a litigant may claim fees where entitlement is the issue, but may not claim attorney's fees incurred in litigating the amount of attorney's fees."). *See**generally**State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Palma*, 629 So.2d 830, 833 (Fla. 1993) ("fees may be awarded for litigating the issue of entitlement to attorney's fees but not the amount of attorney's fees"). *But**see**431*Waverly at Las Olas Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Waverly Las Olas, LLC*, 88 So.3d 386, 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (finding certain contractual language "broad enough to encompass fees incurred in litigating the amount of fees").

Affirmed.
David J. PARKER, Appellant, v. Janet L. CHRISTIANSEN, Appellee.

No. 1D18-170

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

KEVIN J. MCCLINTOCK,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 199 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Eddie Mitchell BROWN v. STATE

CR-16-0965

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jonas JOSEPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1424

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING KYOCERA'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, 

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING KYOCERA'S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1413

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Kyocera’s motion to seal, 

ECF No. 1413, as follows. The Court follows the convention that the first page of the below

document is page 1. 

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX9148 Page 2 GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 24, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1424 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 1
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 28, 2019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY 

OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 28, 2019

Re: Dkt. Nos. 1434, 1435

Before the Court are the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) high priority objections 

(“HPO”) and responses, ECF No. 1435, and Qualcomm Incorporated’s (“Qualcomm”) HPOs and 

responses, ECF No. 1434, for January 28, 2019, day 10 of the trial. Having considered the parties’ 

briefs, the relevant law, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and balancing the factors set forth in 

Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules as follows:

FTC Objections Ruling

Yooseok Kim, Samsung

FTC HPO #1: Qualcomm’s completeness 

designation of Kim Dep. 32:2-19

SUSTAINED. 

Injung Lee, Samsung

FTC HPO #2: Qualcomm completeness 

designations

Lee Dep. 72:19-20 OVERRULED. 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1445 Filed 01/25/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 28, 2019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Lee Dep. 73:19-21, 73:24-74:1, 74:9-11, 74:14 SUSTAINED

Qualcomm Objections 

Richard Blaylock, ZTE

Qualcomm HPO #1: Blaylock Testimony OVERRULED.

Seungho Ahn, Samsung

Qualcomm HPO #2: Ahn Dep. 103:19, 

103:22-104:18

OVERRULED, but may not be admitted for 

the truth of the matter asserted.

Injung Lee, Samsung

Qualcomm HPO #3: Lee Dep. 72:14-18, 

74:16-25, 75:5-9

OVERRULED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1445 Filed 01/25/19 Page 2 of 2
Keith Lamont COLLIER v. STATE

CR-16-0804

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

V.I. Technologies, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-62925, 333-62927, 333-58601, 333-87625, 333-87627,333-94427, 333-75486 and 333-75484) of V.I. Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 21, 2003, except for Note 1, which is as of March 25, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of V.I. Technologies, Inc. as of December 28, 2002 andDecember 29, 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 28, 2002, which report appears in the December 28, 2002 annual report onForm 10-K of V.I. Technologies, Inc. 

 

Our report dated February21, 2003, except for Note 1, which is as of March 25, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations, and its current cash balances and available borrowings under its revolvingcredit facility as of December 28, 2002 are not sufficient to support its operations over the next fiscal year. The Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a registration statement for a $20 million rightsoffering to its shareholders and intends to commence the offering shortly after the registration statement is declared effective by the SEC. Concurrently, the Company plans to close a $4 million equity milestone investment by Pall Corporation.However, the ability of the Company to successfully complete the rights offering and close the Pall investment in a total amount adequate to fund its operations during fiscal year 2003 cannot be determined at this time. Accordingly, this raisessubstantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 25, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 19 (Thursday, January 30, 2025)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 8485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02037]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 19 / Thursday, January 30, 2025 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 8485]]

                Memorandum of January 20, 2025

                
Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture

                Memorandum for the Administrator of the General 
                Services Administration

                I hereby direct the Administrator of the General 
                Services Administration, in consultation with the 
                Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and the 
                heads of departments and agencies of the United States 
                where necessary, to submit to me within 60 days 
                recommendations to advance the policy that Federal 
                public buildings should be visually identifiable as 
                civic buildings and respect regional, traditional, and 
                classical architectural heritage in order to uplift and 
                beautify public spaces and ennoble the United States 
                and our system of self-government. Such recommendations 
                shall consider appropriate revisions to the Guiding 
                Principles for Federal Architecture and procedures for 
                incorporating community input into Federal building 
                design selections.

                If, before such recommendations are submitted, the 
                Administrator of the General Services Administration 
                proposes to approve a design for a new Federal public 
                building that diverges from the policy set forth in 
                this memorandum, the Administrator shall notify me, 
                through the Assistant to the President for Domestic 
                Policy, not less than 30 days before the General 
                Services Administration could reject such design 
                without incurring substantial expenditures. Such 
                notification shall set forth the reasons the 
                Administrator proposes to approve such design.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 20, 2025

[FR Doc. 2025-02037
Filed 1-29-25; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3395-F4-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Optionable,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2007,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge and belief, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


                      Date:  November 13, 2007

                                                /s/ Edward O'Connor
                                                ---------------------
                                                Edward O'Connor
                                                President
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Optionable,  Inc.  and will be retained by  Optionable,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
DJRTI 

INTERNATIONAL 

RTI International 

CARI Interactive Data Access System 

Carl Fisher, Sandhya Bikmal 

RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. www.rti.org 

Presented at FCSM 

Washington, DC 

January 10-12, 2012 
llJRTI 

RTI International 

Outline 

 What is CARI? 

 Concept of CARI coding 

 Overview of CARI Interactive Data Access 

System (CARI System) 

 Current Status 

 Questions 

 Demonstration 
llJRTI 

RTI International 

What is CARI? 

 Computer Audio Recorded Interviews 

 Many benefits to surveys 

– Save time and money 

– Improve questionnaires 

– Improve data quality 

– Improve interviewer performance 
 

llJRTI 

RTI International 

Concept of CARI Coding 

 Cases and their recordings are loaded into system 

 Cases are assigned to coders 

 Coders listen to recordings for cases, assign codes for 

what they hear 

– Code definitions are generally standardized for the purposes of QA, 

behavior coding or coaching interviewers 

 Codes provide concise documentation of what happened 

during interview 

 Codes can be analyzed to identify specific issues 
 

 

llJRTI 

RTI International 

Overview of CARI System 

 Designed and built by RTI for US Census 

Bureau, since September 2009 

 Web-based application 

 Contains components for behavior coding, 

quality assurance, and coaching 

 Built-in training support 

 Similar to, but distinct from, RTI’s own Quality

Evaluation System (QUEST) 
llJRTI 

RTI International 

Comparison of CARI System and QUEST 

CARI System QUEST 

Supports CATI and CAPI  

Live monitoring 

Behavior coding 

Quality assurance  

Coaching/performance assessment  

Standard codes  

Custom codes 

Inter-rater reliability  

Sampling  

Scoring  

Standard reports  

Client portal 

Training support 
 

 

llJRTI 

RTI International 

Components of CARI System 

 Coaching 

– Practical, production-oriented 

– Recognize outstanding performers 

– Identify issues with interviewer performance 

 Quality Assurance 

– Practical, production-oriented 

– Identify data quality issues 

 Behavior Coding 

– Research oriented 

– Identify issues with questionnaire design 

 Interface with BOC Master Control System for data load 
 

llJRTI 

RTI International 

Roles 

 Access to all system functions managed by roles 

 7 different roles provide tiered privileges and 

appropriate access to features and data 
llJRTI 

RTI International 

Current Status 

 Coaching 

– At “Systems Test” stage

– Formal testing underway 

 Enhancements 

– Enhancements made to existing components 

– Formal testing underway 

 Additional feedback and suggestions being 

collected 
 

llJRTI 

RTI International 

Questions? 

 Before we begin demonstrating the system, are 

there any questions? 
llJRTI 

RTI International 

Contact Information 

Carl Fisher 

Assistant Project Director 

919.541.6108 

carlf@rti.org 

Sandhya Bikmal 

Quality Team Lead 

919.485.5537 

sbikmal@rti.org
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CFO PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
      15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the annual report of Endovasc, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, M. Dwight Cantrell,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and


(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:
                October 10, 2005
            
            /s/
                M. Dwight CantrellM.
                Dwight CantrellChief
                Operating Officer





A
      SIGNED
      ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED
      TO
      ENDOVASC, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ENDOVASC, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1510

PATRICK CHRISTIAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv
- 00901

- MHL )

Submitted : August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Patrick O. Christian appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Christian v. United
States , No. 3:16

- cv
- 00901

- MHL (E.D. Va. May 1, 2018) . We di spense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED