alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis G. Dracup, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2008
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|                        |  | Dennis G. Dracup                    
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
EXHIBIT 1 

PUBLIC VERSION OF DKT. 1411-4 PURSUANT TO 

COURT’S JANUARY 24, 2019 ORDER (DKT. 1427) 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 16
EZ5243.112

LZ1119.112

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 2 of 16
EZ5243.113

LZ1119.113

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 3 of 16
EZ5243.114

LZ1119.114

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 4 of 16
EZ5243.115

LZ1119.115

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 5 of 16
EZ5243.116

LZ1119.116

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 6 of 16
EZ5243.117

LZ1119.117

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 7 of 16
EZ5243.118

LZ1119.118

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 8 of 16
EZ5243.119

LZ1119.119

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 9 of 16
EZ5243.11;

LZ1119.11;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 10 of 16
EZ5243.121

LZ1119.121

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 11 of 16
EZ5243.122

LZ1119.122

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 12 of 16
EZ5243.123

LZ1119.123

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 13 of 16
EZ5243.124

LZ1119.124

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 14 of 16
EZ5243.125

LZ1119.125

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 15 of 16
EZ5243.126

LZ1119.126

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1428 Filed 01/24/19 Page 16 of 16
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 19 (Thursday, January 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01915]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 30, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 22, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
599 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1149, K2025-1149.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-01915 Filed 1-29-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

American LegalNet, Inc. 

www.FormsWorkFlow.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the 

Northern District of California

Life On Air, Inc. 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) 

) ) Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-07403 

Plaintiff(s) 

v.

Chathouse Inc. 

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

Chathouse Inc. 

c/o Suresh Sastry 

1949 Otis Drive 

Alameda, CA 94501

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you 

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, 

whose name and address are:

Eric Ball 

Fenwick & West LLP 

801 California Street 

Mountain View, CA 94041 

Jedediah Wakefield 

Fenwick & West LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Shannon E. Turner 

Fenwick & West LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date: 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk 

 

JCS January 4, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan Y. Soong Case 3:16-cv-07403-JCS Document 6 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

American LegalNet, Inc. 

www.FormsWorkFlow.com

Civil Action No. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) 

was received by me on (date) 

 I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) 

 on (date) ; or

 I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) 

 , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) 

 on (date) ; or

 I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

 Other (specify): 

 

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ 

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. 

Date: 

Server’s signature

 

Printed name and title

 

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: 

 

CV 16-7403 JCS

Case 3:16-cv-07403-JCS Document 6 Filed 01/04/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 15.1
 
 November
        6, 2007
 
 Bois
        d'Arc Energy, Inc.
 Chase Tower
 600
        Travis, Suite 5200
 Houston,
        TX 77002
 
 Shareholders
        and Board of Directors
 Bois
        d'Arc Energy, Inc.
 
 We
        are
        aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
        333-127744 filed on Form S-8 of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc. of our report dated
        November 6, 2007 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial
        statements of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q
        for the
        quarter ended September 30, 2007.
 
 /s/
        Ernst
& Young LLP
 
 Dallas,
        Texas
Caylan Dayne FRASER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3179

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael Layton Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Case 3:06-cv-00438-M Document 9 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 57 

Redesignating the Robert E. Lee Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery 

as the ‘‘Arlington House National Historic Site’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2022 

Mr. KAINE introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Redesignating the Robert E. Lee Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery as the ‘‘Arlington House National Historic Site’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That— 

4 (1) the site administered by the National Park 

5 Service and dedicated as a memorial to Robert E. 

6 Lee pursuant to the joint resolution of June 29, 

7 1955 (Public Law 84–107; 69 Stat. 190), as amend8 ed by the joint resolution of June 30, 1972 (Public 

9 Law 92–333; 86 Stat. 401), shall after the date of 

10 the enactment of this joint resolution be redesigVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:35 Jul 19, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ57.IS SJ57

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 57 IS 

1 nated and known as the ‘‘Arlington House National 

2 Historic Site’’; 

3 (2) any reference in any law, regulation, map, 

4 document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the site referred to in paragraph (1) shall 

6 be considered to be a reference to the Arlington 

7 House National Historic Site; and 

8 (3) the joint resolution of June 29, 1955 (Pub9 lic Law 84–107; 69 Stat. 190), and the joint resolu10 tion of June 30, 1972 (Public Law 92–333; 86 Stat. 

11 401), are repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                 [RUBIN, BROWN, GORNSTEIN & CO. LLP LETTERHEAD]


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
West Pointe Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of West Pointe Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 2001, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of West Pointe Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears
in the annual report on Form 10-K of West Pointe Bancorp, Inc.


                                    /s/  RUBIN, BROWN, GORNSTEIN & CO. LLP
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         RUBIN, BROWN, GORNSTEIN & CO. LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 28, 2001
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re C.B., Individually and as Next Friend for J.B., a Minor

No. 06

- 22

- 00062

- CV Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief
Justice Morriss

, Justice Stevens and J ustice
van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2022
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUST ICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
# m8610.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.9.2017 C(2017) 6509 final To the Notifying Parties Subject : Case M. 8610 – CKI / CKP / ISTA GROUP Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 28 August 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking CK Hutc hison Holdings Limited ( “CKHH”, the Cayman Islands), indirectly via CK Inftrastructure Holding Limited (“CKI”, Bermuda), and Cheung Kong Property Holdings Limited (“CKP”, Cayman Islands) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the Ista Group, whose ultimate holding company is ista Luxembourg GmbH S.a.r.l (“ ista ” Luxembourg) by way of a purchase of shares. 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for CKHH: ports and related services, retail, infrastructure, energy and telecommunications. Within CKHH, CKI manages diversified investments in energy infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, water infrastructure, waste management, waste-to-energy and infrastructure related businesses; - for CKP: property development and investment, hotel and serviced suite operation, property and project management, infrastructure investments and aircraft leasing; - for ista : provision of heat and water sub-metering services as well as related services. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission ( Signed )
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 294 , 05 . 9 . 2017 , p. 5 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, F. Morgan Gasior, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             |  |                        
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ F. MORGAN GASIOR                                         |  | Dated: November 1, 2010
|F. Morgan Gasior                                             |  |                        
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |  |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



40
Myles P. CORRIGAN and Deborah A. Smith, Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR ARGENT SECURITIES, INC., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-W4, United States of America, Department of the Treasury et al., Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-2338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 66 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans 

Affairs relating to ‘‘Reproductive Health Services’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2022 

Mr. TUBERVILLE (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. DAINES, Mr. LANKFORD, 

Mr. MORAN, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to ‘‘Reproductive Health Services’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Veterans Affairs relating to ‘‘Reproductive 

5 Health Services’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 55287; published SepVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:13 Dec 14, 2022 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ66.IS SJ66

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 66 IS 

1 tember 9, 2022), and such rule shall have no force or ef2 fect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Beverly
Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, William R. Floyd, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                            
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                              
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    result of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ WILLIAM R. FLOYD   
| |                        
| | William R. Floyd       
| | Chief Executive Officer

March 2, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Gary P. LEDSOME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3859

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 12, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Tabitha Herrera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Bilbrey, J.

Gary P. Ledsome appeals the revocation of his probation on multiple grounds. As one of the bases of revocation is not supported by competent and substantial evidence, we reverse and remand.

Ledsome was alleged to have violated several conditions of probation, including the failure to report to his probation officer on May 1, 2018, as required. At the revocation hearing, the probation officer testified Ledsome was given until the 31st of that month to report, but other evidence adduced at the hearing on the affidavit of probation established Ledsome was arrested on the 31st. Thus, the violation for failure to report on May 1st is not established in the record by competent, substantial evidence. While other violations were established, the trial court did not indicate whether it would revoke probation and impose the same sentence absent a violation for failure to report to the probation officer, and therefore, we must remand this cause to the trial court. *See* *Washington v. State* , 215 So. 3d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

Further, the written order of revocation does not conform to the trial court's oral pronouncements, the latter of which controls. *See* *Justice v. State* , 674 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1996). While the written order finds violations of conditions 2, 10, and 15, the trial court did not orally find such violations. The written order does not refer to a violation of condition 1 (failure to report) nor multiple violations of condition 5 (new law violations), despite the trial court's oral pronouncement at the hearing below that Ledsome had substantially and willfully violated these conditions. A corrected written order is therefore required.

Accordingly, the cause is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

Ray and Jay, JJ., concur.