alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Bryan Markert, Secretary and Treasurer of
Carolyn River Projects Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Carolyn River
      Projects Ltd. for the period ended August 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Carolyn River Projects Ltd.                                                                  

Dated: October 15, 2008

| | /s/
      Bryan Markert               
| | --------------------------------------
| | Bryan Markert, Secretary and Treasurer
| | (Principal Financial Officer)         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Carolyn River
Projects Ltd. and will be retained by Carolyn River Projects Ltd. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Joshua P. MOORE, DOC #R65935, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3283

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and in connection with the Annual Report of on Form 10-K ofChoicePoint Inc. (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certifies that: Based on my knowledge,     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.     /s/ Steven W. Surbaugh       Steven W. Surbaugh     Chief Financial OfficerMarch 15, 2005
# L_2018038EN.01004101.xml

| 10.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 38/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 38/41

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 of 1 March 2017 imposing definitive countervailing duties on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council and terminating the partial interim review investigation pursuant to Article 19(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 56 of 3 March 2017
  )

On page 122, in Annex 1:

for:

| Name of the Company | TARIC additional code |
| --- | --- |
| ‘Era Solar Co. Ltd | B818 ’ |

Name of the Company

TARIC additional code

‘Era Solar Co. Ltd

B818 ’

read:

| Name of the Company | TARIC additional code |
| --- | --- |
| ‘Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd | B818 ’ |

Name of the Company

TARIC additional code

‘Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd

B818 ’

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Each of Thomas T. Edman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Lawrence D.
Firestone, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Senior Vice President and
Secretary of Applied Films Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 28,
2003 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and            
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended June 28, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Applied
Films Corporation.

Dated: September 12, 2003

| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Thomas T. Edman

Thomas T. Edman 
| |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
| |  |                                      
| |  | /s/ Lawrence D. Firestone            
| |  | Lawrence D. Firestone                
| |  | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,  
| |  | Senior Vice President and Secretary  

A signed original of this certification has been provided to Applied Films
Corporation and will be retained by Applied Films Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
CX5391 

REVISED REDACTED VERSION 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 2 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 3 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 4 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 5 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 6 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 7 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 8 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 9 of 10
&;

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1287-4 Filed 01/14/19 Page 10 of 10
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER INSTRUCTING QUALCOMM TO FILE UNDER SEAL UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF THE 

EXHIBITS TO QUALCOMM’S OPPOSITION TO THE FTC’S PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER INSTRUCTING QUALCOMM 

TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF THE 

EXHIBITS TO QUALCOMM’S 

OPPOSITION TO THE FTC’S 

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

MOTION

On September 24, 2018, Defendant Qualcomm, Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) filed its 

opposition to Plaintiff the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) motion for partial summary 

judgment. ECF No. 870. With the opposition, Qualcomm filed the redacted versions of several 

accompanying exhibits that Qualcomm seeks to seal. See ECF No. 872 (Qualcomm’s 

administrative motion to file under seal Qualcomm’s opposition and certain accompanying 

exhibits). Qualcomm filed under seal an unredacted version of its opposition to the FTC’s motion 

for partial summary judgment, see ECF No. 872-4, but failed to file under seal unredacted 

versions of the accompanying exhibits, as it required by Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(D). 

The Court hereby ORDERS Qualcomm to file under seal unredacted versions of the 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 907 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER INSTRUCTING QUALCOMM TO FILE UNDER SEAL UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF THE 

EXHIBITS TO QUALCOMM’S OPPOSITION TO THE FTC’S PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

exhibits accompanying Qualcomm’s opposition to the FTC’s motion for partial summary 

judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 907 Filed 10/17/18 Page 2 of 2
Earl J. VOISIN, Jr. v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS

NO. 2018-CI-1023

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Board of Directors
West Pointe Bancorp, Inc.
Belleville, Illinois


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (333-68800) and on Form S-8 (333-49990) of West Pointe Bancorp, Inc.
and subsidiary of our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,
dated March 2, 2005, on the consolidated balance sheets of West Pointe Bancorp,
Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Pointe Bancorp, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2004.


                                               /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

                                               Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 28, 2005
Exhibit 99.1
 
 TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580
    
    
    
    FAX (713) 651-08491100 LOUISIANA SUITE 3800
    
    HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218
    
    TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191
  
    SEC PARAMETERS    Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.
 ProvedDeveloped
    
    
    
    
    
    
    TotalProducing
    
    
    Non-Producing
    
    
    Undeveloped
    
    
    ProvedNet Remaining ReservesOil/Condensate  Barrels
    
    
    281,850
    
    
    
    46,255
    
    
    
    10,551
    
    
    
    338,656Plant Products  Barrels
    
    
    160,700
    
    
    
    87,112
    
    
    
    33,154
    
    
    
    280,966Gas  MMCF
    
    
    8,694
    
    
    
    2,434
    
    
    
    622
    
    
    
    11,750Income Data ($)Future Gross Revenue
    
    $
    49,561,789
    
    
    $
    13,463,738
    
    
    $
    3,316,918
    
    
    $
    66,342,445Deductions
    
    
    11,565,236
    
    
    
    4,199,693
    
    
    
    2,380,475
    
    
    
    18,145.40Future Net Income (FNI)
    
    $
    37,996,553
    
    
    $
    9,264,045
    
    
    $
    936,443
    
    
    $
    48,197,041Discounted FNI @ 10%
    
    $
    32,846,145
    
    
    $
    6,220,033
    
    
    $
    492,310
    
    
    $
    39,558,488
 1200, 530 8TH AVENUE, S.W.
    
    CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 3S8
    
    TEL (403) 262-2799
    
    FAX (403) 262-2790621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550
    
    DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501
    
    TEL (303) 623-9147
    
    FAX (303) 623-4258




---



##### 



Discounted Future Net IncomeAs of December 31, 2009Discount Rate
    
    TotalPercent
    
    Proved9
    
    $
    40,243,45715
    
    $
    36,546,59020
    
    $
    34,081,16825
    
    $
    32,021,926
  Reserves Included in This Report




---



##### 



Estimates of Reserves
   Future Production Rates




---



##### 



Hydrocarbon Prices
   Costs




---



##### 



Standards of Independence and Professional Qualification
      Terms of Usage
   RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
================================================================================
Exhibit 32.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of AAA Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended  October 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.

Date: December 23, 2005


/s/ Dennis LaPrairie
------------------------------------
Dennis LaPrairie
Principal Financial Officer
#### Lionel David KOLKER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 03-74029.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2004.*

Decided May 17, 2004.

Lionel David Kolker, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Benjamin C. Sanchez, Regional Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Charles S. Casazza, Curtis C. Pett, Esq., Richard Farber, Esq., Eileen J. O’Connor, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Emily Ann Parker, Esq., Acting Chief Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lionel David Kolker appeals pro se the Tax Court’s order dismissing Kolker’s petition disputing tax deficiencies and additions to tax asserted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and directing Kolker to pay $10,000 in sanctions to the United *553States pursuant to Section 6673(a) of the Tax Code.

The Tax Court did not err in dismissing the petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the petition failed to set forth any clear and concise assignments of error or any facts demonstrating any error in the Commissioner’s determinations, as required by Tax Court Rule 34(b)(4) and (5).

Kolker’s only challenge to the Tax Court’s sanctions award is that the erroneous dismissal of the petition renders the sanctions award moot. This contention is unavailing because the dismissal of the petition was not erroneous.

The Commissioner’s motion that Kolker be sanctioned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1912 and Fed. R.App. P. 38 for bringing a frivolous appeal is GRANTED in part. We award damages to the government in the amount of $1,500.

Kolker’s motion “to admit newly discovered evidence,” *** construed as a motion to supplement the record on appeal, is DENIED.

The Tax Court’s order is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

***

 The newly-discovered evidence Kolker wants this court to consider is a transcript of a settlement hearing with Internal Revenue Service employees that occurred February 23, 2004, seven months after the order from which Kolker appeals was filed.
Yokita Y. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2278

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Veronica WALDMAN, et al., Appellants, v. LAQUER FAMILY HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2116

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 9, 2019

Veronica Waldman, in proper person.

Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel and Gary M. Freedman and Kimberly J. Freedman, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court's final order denying Veronica Waldman's motion to set aside a foreclosure sale. Ms. Waldman maintains that the foreclosure sale was conducted with "dramatic irregularities" and technical errors, but introduced no competent substantial evidence below, nor any record here, to substantiate that contention. *Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee*, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).

Ms. Waldman's second issue on appeal argues that she was not afforded due process regarding a notice of hearing on her objections to the conduct of the sale. After she failed to appear at the hearing, the trial court denied her objections.

*1062The record discloses that there was indeed an invalid email address used, "sawylw@gmail.com" instead of the correct address, "sawvlw@gmail.com," on the service list for a copy intended to be sent to Ms. Waldman. Ms. Waldman's argument fails, however, because the record further discloses that one law firm for her had withdrawn from representing her, but another attorney of record remained counsel of record and was duly served with the notice. "[N]otice to the attorney constitutes notice to the client." *Comprehensive Health Ctr., Inc. v. United Auto. Ins. Co.*, 56 So.3d 41, 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

The final order is affirmed.
**Exhibit
      99-1**




**AMERICAN
      REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY FILES FORM 10-Q**





**~** **COMPANY
      BOOKS ONE-TIME NON-RECURRING CHARGE IN**


**SECOND
      QUARTER AS LITIGATION RESERVE** **~**








GLENDALE,
      California (August 14, 2006) - American Reprographics Company (NYSE: ARP),
      the
      nation’s leading provider of reprographics services and technology today filed
      its 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission. In the filing the Company reported that, in accordance with
      generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), it has taken a one-time,
      non-recurring charge of $13.5 million in the second quarter as a reserve against
      a possible adverse outcome in the appeal of the previously disclosed Louis
      Frey
      bankruptcy litigation.





The
      financial statements reported in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q
      reflect changes from the information the Company furnished in its earnings
      release originally announced on August 3, 2006. The litigation charge of $13.54
      million includes an $11.26 million litigation reserve and $2.28 million in
      interest. The litigation reserve is offset by a corresponding tax benefit of
      $5.42 million and reduces net income by $8.12 million for the six months ended
      June 30, 2006.





ARC
      continues to believe its position is meritorious, and it remains committed
      to
      vigorously defending its position through the appellate process.







**About
      American Reprographics Company**




American
      Reprographics Company is the leading reprographics company in the United States
      providing business-to-business document management services to the
      architectural, engineering and construction, or AEC industries. The Company
      provides these services to companies in non-AEC industries, such as technology,
      financial services, retail, entertainment, and food and hospitality, which
      also
      require sophisticated document management services. American Reprographics
      Company provides its core services through its suite of reprographics technology
      products, a network of more than 200 locally-branded reprographics service
      centers across the U.S., and on-site at their customers’ locations. The
      Company’s service centers are arranged in a hub and satellite structure and are
      digitally connected as a cohesive network, allowing the provision of services
      both locally and nationally to more than 73,000 active customers.





**Contacts:**





David
                Stickney
            Jason
                GolzVP
                of Corporate Communications
            Financial
                DynamicsPhone:
                925-949-5100
            Phone:
                415-439-4532Email:dstickney@e-arc.com
            Email:jgolz@fd-us.com
<PAGE>   1
                                SUBSIDIARIES OF                      Exhibit 21
                                CHOICEPOINT INC.



ChoicePoint Services Inc.
PRC Corporation
Professional Test Administrators, Inc.
Intellisys, Inc.
CDB Infotek
Applied BioConcepts Inc.
Innovative Data Services, Inc.
ChoicePoint Business and Government Services Inc.
Osborn Group Inc.
ChoicePoint Health Systems Inc.
Application Profiles Inc.
Osborn Laboratories (Canada) Inc.
Statewide Data Services, Inc.
ChoicePoint Direct Inc.
National Credit Audit Corporation
Optimum Graphics Printing, Inc.
Public Records Online Inc.
EquiSearch Services Inc.
ChoicePoint Asset Company
ChoicePoint Capital Corporation
ChoicePoint Licensing Company
SearchPointe Inc.
DataMart Acquisition Company, Inc.
NSA Resources, Inc.
National Safety Alliance, Incorporated
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, F. Morgan Gasior, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|/s/ F. Morgan Gasior                                         |  | Dated: August 14, 2006
|F. Morgan Gasior                                             |  |                       
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |  |                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



43
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WORSTEN MACK ANDREWS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

CITY OF PITTSBURG, a municipal

corporation; MICHAEL KEEFE,

individually and in his Official Capacity as

a Police Officer for the City of Pittsburg,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 19-16399

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00228-JCS

Northern District of California, 

San Francisco

ORDER

Appellants’ motion to dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. 9) is granted. 

Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. 

A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. 

FOR THE COURT:

By: Steven J. Saltiel

Circuit Mediator

FILED

SEP 6 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

SJS/Mediation

Case 3:17-cv-00228-JCS Document 78 Filed 09/09/19 Page 1 of 1