alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN DAMON BARTH,

Plaintiff,

v.

K. SWIWET BINNING, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00155-WHO (PR) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

THIS SUIT SHOULD NOT BE 

DISMISSED

Plaintiff Barth is ordered to show cause on or before February 12, 2018 why this 

federal civil rights action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

This suit was instituted a year ago and Barth has failed to settle on a final form of 

his complaint or to follow the directions of the Court. He filed an original complaint, then 

asked for leave to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 1 and 12.) Leave was granted, 

and he filed a first amended complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 13 and 18.) Then he asked for leave to 

file a second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 19.) Leave was granted, as was an extension 

of time Barth requested. (Dkt. Nos. 20 and 22.) As of the date of this order, Barth has not 

filed a second amended complaint and the extension of time has expired.

A year’s delay is not acceptable. Barth, therefore, must show cause why his suit 

should not be dismissed. In his response, Barth should include either (1) his second 

amended complaint; or (2) a request to reinstate either the original or first amended 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

complaint as the operative pleading. His response is due on or before February 12, 2018

and must comply in all respects with this order. No extensions of time will be granted. 

Failure to file an appropriate response by the deadline will result in the dismissal of this 

action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2018

_________________________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of West Pointe Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bruce A. Bone, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 29, 2004                                 /s/ Bruce A. Bone
                                               -----------------

                                               Bruce A. Bone

                                               Executive Vice President and

                                               Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to West Pointe Bancorp, Inc. and will
be retained by West Pointe Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Elizabeth Plaza, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Pedro J. Lasanta, Chief Financial
Officer  of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
September 14, 2009





/s/ Elizabeth Plaza
            
            /s/ Pedro J.
  LasantaElizabeth
      Plaza
            
            Pedro
      J. LasantaChief
      Executive Officer
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1








PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Golden State Petro (IOM I-B) PLC (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Trøim, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: June 14, 2011





/s/ Tor Olav Trøim


Tor Olav Trøim


Principal Executive Officer
#### Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-1279.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 13, 2004.

Decided: May 19, 2004.

Gilbert L. Spurlock, Appellant, pro se.

Sandra Henson Kinney, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the United States Army Corps of Engineers. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, *917we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs,*No. CA-02-404-3 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 3, 2004). Spurlock’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT C 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 44-3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 44-3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 44-3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Optionable,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2006,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 25, 2006                            /s/ Marc-Andre Boisseau
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Marc-Andre Boisseau
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



  [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Optionable, Inc. and will be retained by Optionable, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]








                                       31
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, F. Morgan Gasior, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                             |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|/s/ F. MORGAN GASIOR                                         |  | Dated: August 5, 2009
|F. Morgan Gasior                                             |  |                      
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |  |                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



48
Antonio Teshawn NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3503

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 19, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Armond DUHON

NO. 2019-K-0124

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied.
| 1) | such      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | the      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bridge      Capital Holdings. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 5, 2009 | /s/ Daniel P. Myers                        |   |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Daniel      P. Myers                       |   |
|                        | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
PROPOSED ORDER 1 3:17-CV-00076-MEJ

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 Based upon the Joint Motion for Dismissal, and good cause, this Court 

hereby orders the action to be, and is, dismissed with prejudice, with this Court to 

retain jurisdiction for purposes of settlement. 

IT IS ORDERED. 

Dated: 

HON. MAGISTRATE MARIAELENA JAMES 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Sonia E. Anaya, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

D. Scott Carruthers, A Professional 

Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

) 

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00076-MEJ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL 

OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

HON. MAGISTRATE MARIAELENA JAMES 

October 19, 2017
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 279 

Designating June 21, 2021 through June 25, 2021, as ‘‘National 

Cybersecurity Education Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2021 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Mr. CASSIDY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating June 21, 2021 through June 25, 2021, as 

‘‘National Cybersecurity Education Week’’. 

Whereas, according to a 2017 projection, the United States 

will face a shortage of 1,800,000 cybersecurity workers 

by 2022; 

Whereas recent cyberattacks on the United States have highlighted the cybersecurity workforce shortage in the 

United States that— 

(1) poses a threat to the national security of the 

United States; 

(2) jeopardizes the economy of the United States; 

(3) puts the digital privacy of the United States at 

risk; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 279 ATS 

(4) threatens the critical infrastructure of the 

United States; 

Whereas expanding cybersecurity education opportunities is 

important to address the cybersecurity workforce shortage and prepare the United States for ongoing and future national security threats; 

Whereas cybersecurity education can provide learning and career opportunities for kindergarten through grade 12 students across the United States, as well as bolster the capacity of the domestic workforce to defend the United 

States and secure the economy of the United States; 

Whereas, in 2020, introduced as part of the Providing Resources for Ongoing Training and Education in Cyber 

Technologies Act of 2020 and enacted as part of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116–283), 

Congress authorized the Cybersecurity Education Training Assistance Program, a Department of Homeland Security initiative to provide cybersecurity career awareness, curricular resources, and professional development 

to elementary and secondary schools; and 

Whereas ensuring access to cybersecurity education for all 

students in the United States regardless of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or geographic location will 

expand opportunities for good-paying jobs in high-demand fields: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates June 21, 2021 through June 25, 

3 2021, as ‘‘National Cybersecurity Education Week’’; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 279 ATS 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to acknowledge the importance of cybersecurity edu3 cation; 

4 (3) encourages educational and training institu5 tions to increase the understanding and awareness 

6 of cybersecurity education at such institutions; and 

7 (4) commits to— 

8 (A) raising awareness about cybersecurity 

9 education; and 

10 (B) taking legislative actions to address cy11 bersecurity education expansion and address 

12 the cybersecurity workforce shortage. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
# C_2021009EN.01001001.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 23 October 2020 — Schneider Electric SA and Others v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance

(Case C-556/20)

(2021/C 9/16)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Schneider Electric SA, Axa SA, BNP Paribas, ENGIE, Orange SA, L’Air liquide, société anonyme pour l’étude et l’exploitation des procédés Georges Claude

Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance

Question referred

Does Article 4 of Directive 90/435/EC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States (1), in view, in particular, of Article 7(2) thereof, preclude a provision such as Article 223 sexies of the General Tax Code, which provides, in order to ensure the correct implementation of a scheme designed to eliminate economic double taxation of dividends, for a levy when a parent company redistributes profits which have been distributed to it by subsidiaries established in another Member State?

---

(1)  OJ 1990 L 225, p. 6.

---
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-23   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-23   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-23   Filed 12/14/17   Page 3 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-23   Filed 12/14/17   Page 4 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-23   Filed 12/14/17   Page 5 of 5
Juan CAMPOS v. UNLIMITED MASTER CONTRACTORS, LLC, et al

NO. 2019-C-0427

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Denied.

GUIDRY, J., recused.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-32453, 333-37498, 333-102249, 333-105174 and 333-133706 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated February 28, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statementschedule of ChoicePoint Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (which report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes explanatory paragraphs relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R “Share Based Payment” effective January 1, 2006, SFAS No. 158 “EmployerAccounting for Defined Pension and Other Post Retirement Benefit Plans” effective December 31, 2006, FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” effective January 1, 2007, and theCompany’s signing of an agreement and plan of merger on February 20, 2008 to sell the Company) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

February 28, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1**
   I, Matthew M. O’Connell, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ORBIMAGE Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures, and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 29, 2004 /s/ Matthew M. O’Connell                    Matthew M. O’Connell  President and Chief Executive Officer
David Phillip WILSON v. STATE

CR-16-0675

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Johnny EDWARDS

1170015 (CR-15-0335)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                 CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Highriver Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Tay, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: April 15, 2005


/s/ William Tay
-------------------------------------------
William Tay, President
(principal executive officer and principal
 accounting officer)
Demonstration of the Hand-Held Computer to Be Used for the 2010 Census 

Karen Field 

U.S. Census Bureau 

Demonstration Focus: The US Census Bureau has contracted with the Harris Corporation to automate 

portions of the 2010 Census. The data for three of the main decennial census operations will be collected 

using a specially designed hand-held computer (HHC). W e will demonstrate some of the key features of 

the HHC such as payroll, viewing/updating the address list, and report capabilities.