alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                           SECOND AMENDMENT OF LEASE
                           -------------------------



     WHEREAS, on September 30, 1997, a Lease Agreement was entered into by and
between FRENCH'S MILL ASSOCIATES II, LLP, a Connecticut limited liability
partnership having a principal place of business at 160 Robbins Street,
Waterbury, Connecticut, as Landlord, and OPTICARE EYE HEALTH CENTERS, INC.,
having a principal place of business at 160 Robbins Street, Waterbury,
Connecticut, as Tenant, for premises located at 160 Robbins Street, Waterbury,
Connecticut; and

     WHEREAS, the parties amended said Lease Agreement by Amendment to Lease
dated as of June 1, 2000 (the Lease Agreement and all Amendments thereto
hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Lease"); and

     WHEREAS, the parties wish to and do hereby further amend the Lease as
follows:

     1. Section 1.4 of the Lease is hereby amended so that commencing October 1,
2002, and continuing through September 30, 2007, the fixed minimum annual rental
shall be One Hundred Twenty-One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Nine & 00/100ths
Dollars ($121,329.00), payable in equal monthly installments of Ten Thousand One
Hundred Ten & 75/100ths Dollars ($10,110.75) on the first day of each month, in
advance. Thereafter, the fixed minimum annual rental shall be adjusted every
five (5) years in accordance with Rider 1 attached to the Lease.

     2. The typographical error contained in the first line of Section 1.5 of
the Lease is hereby corrected so that the "Tenant shall have the option to
extend this Lease for two (2) additional terms of ten (10) years each..."

     3. The last sentence contained in the second full paragraph of Rider 1
attached to the Lease is hereby corrected to read as follows: "Said report shall
contain the fair market value rent for the demised premises, reduced to a square
footage rental which shall be multiplied by 6,222 square feet to arrive at the
adjusted annual rent."

     4. All other terms and conditions of the Lease, which are not inconsistent
with the above, shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and
seals as of the 1st day of October, 2002.


Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:                      FRENCH'S MILL ASSOCIATES II, LLP


/s/ Linda Boger                          By  /s/ W. Scott Peterson
-----------------------------              ------------------------------
                                             W. Scott Peterson
                                             Managing Partner
/s/ Cassie Gianfredi
-----------------------------
                                         OPTICARE EYE HEALTH CENTERS, INC.

/s/ Linda Boger
-----------------------------            By  /s/ Christopher J. Walls
                                           ------------------------------
                                             Christopher J. Walls
/s/ Cassie Gianfredi                         Its Vice President
-----------------------------
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Communications Holdings,
Inc.,
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report,
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report,
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)  15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   August 7, 2009
    /s/ Robert J. CurreyRobert J. CurreyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 3:06-cr-00014-N Document 120 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 379
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CarrAmerica Realty GP Holdings, Inc. (the
Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas A. CarrThomas A. CarrChief Executive OfficerMarch 2, 2006/s/ Stephen E. RiffeeStephen E. RiffeeChief Financial OfficerMarch 2, 2006
Seize the Data: 

Program Oversight, Policy Recommendations, 

and Insights from Using Linked Survey and 

Administrative Data

Organizer: Sirin Yaemsiri, Government Accountability Office

Chair and Discussant: Jared Smith, Government Accountability Office
Who We Are: The 

Government Watchdog

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), is 

an independent, nonpartisan agency that advises 

Congress and Agency Heads about ways to make 

government more efficient, effective, ethical, 

equitable, and responsive.
When we talk, others listen

• We work at the request of Congressional committees or as statutorily required

• We usually testify around 100 times per year at Congressional hearings and 

make hundreds of recommendations a year.

• In FY 2022, our work yielded $55.6 billion in financial benefits
Data, Data Everywhere

• Internal data

• Products from statistical agencies

• Agency administrative data
Agenda

1. Abinash Mohanty, Blending Probability Sampling with API and 

Administrative Data: Estimating Recall Rates for Rideshare Vehicles 

in the 50 States 

2. Frances Tirado and Sonya Vartivarian, Unequal Opportunity: 

Leveraging Blended Data to Assess Disparities in Dress Code and 

Discipline Among K-12 Students

3. Lijia Guo, Disparities in Longevity across Communities in the United 

States*

4. Jared Smith, Discussant

*Research not based on a GAO engagement
Note

• The first two topics, which are presented by Nash, Frances, and 

Sonya, summarize work that has been previously published by GAO. 

The third talk was prepared by Lijia in her personal capacity. The 

opinions expressed in the third presentation are the author’s own and 

do not necessarily reflect the view of GAO, or the United States 

Government.

*Research not based on a GAO engagement
Audience Reminder

• Please mute your cell phone ringers.

• Hold questions for the Q&A time after all of the presentations have 

been presented. 
Federal Statistical System Agency Program Data 
Examples 

Span All 

Facets of 

• Fraud • International Affairs • Financial Issues • Health Care • Defense and Security • Environment • Infrastructure • Future Technology
Seizing the data!

• Describe the benefit and challenges of combining data from multiple 

sources, and what are other analytical approached you considered.
Joseph Manuel LEWIS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-5060

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 06, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Report of Champps Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 8, 2004 (the Report), I, Frederick J. Dreibholz,
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  September 8, 2004 |  | By: /s/ Frederick J. Dreibholz
        Frederick J. Dreibholz
        Vice President, Chief 
        Financial Officer and 
        Treasurer(Principal 
        Financial and Accounting Officer)
|                         |  |
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantair, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Steven Santo, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May
        14 ,
        2008
 
 /s/
        Steven Santo
 Name:
                Steven
                    SantoTitle:
                Chief
                    Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements and amendments thereto

<TABLE>

<S>                             <C>
    Form S-8 No. 33-21505       Employee Stock Purchase Plan
    Form S-8 No. 333-41671      Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan
    Form S-8 No. 333-41669      1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
    Form S-8 No. 333-41673      Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
    Form S-8 No. 333-42131      Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
</TABLE>

of Beverly Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 1999 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Beverly Enterprises,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1998.



                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Little Rock, Arkansas
March 26, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tarpon  Industries,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic  Report"),
we,  James W.  Bradshaw,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Active  Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  and Matthew Soderman,  Chief Accounting  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Periodic  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 21, 2007
                                     /s/ James W. Bradshaw
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    James W. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Acting Chief Financial Officer
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR OBJECTIONS FOR MONDAY EVIDENCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE FOR OBJECTIONS FOR 

MONDAY EVIDENCE

On October 24, 2018, the Court set deadlines for high priority objections to 

demonstratives, exhibits, deposition testimony, and live testimony (“HPO evidence”) during trial. 

ECF No. 922. The parties shall file their objections to HPO evidence to be introduced on Mondays 

by the preceding Friday at 8:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 2, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1068 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 17-cv-0015 NC

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

GDRR PROPERTIES, LLC, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00015 NC

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. 28

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

no issue remains for the Court’s determination,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are

DISMISSED with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not reached, any party may

move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled 

dates are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 13, 2017, _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge
Otniel CALDERON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3691

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 10.43



  List of Contents of Exhibits and Schedules to the Guaranty National Insurance
                        Company Stock Purchase Agreement



      Exhibits                                     Description
      --------                                     -----------

Exhibit A                                 RIC (Landmark) Quota Share Reinsurance
                                          Agreement

Exhibit B                                 RIC (Landmark) Administrative Services
                                          Agreement

Exhibit C                                 Assumption of Liabilities Agreement



      Schedules                                    Description
      ---------                                    -----------

Seller Disclosure Schedules

Schedule 1.1(a)                           Seller Persons with Knowledge

Schedule 3.3                              Non-Contravention

Schedule 3.9                              Governmental Approvals

Schedule 3.11                             Tax

Schedule 3.12                             Governmental Proceedings or
                                          Investigations

Schedule 3.13                             Litigation

Schedule 3.14(a)                          Statutory Deposits

Schedule 3.14(b)                          Company Bank Accounts and Safe Deposit
                                          Boxes

Schedule 3.15(a)                          Material Agreement

Schedule 3.15(b)                          Exceptions to Material Agreements

Schedule 3.17(c)(i)                       Surplus Lines Eligibility States

Schedule 3.17(c)(ii)                      Suspension or Termination of Surplus
                                          Lines Eligibility

Schedule 3.18                             Reinsurance Ceded

<PAGE>

Schedule 3.19                             Exceptions to Absence of Certain
                                          Changes

Schedule 3.20                             Intercompany Accounts
                                          Purchaser Disclosure Schedules

Schedule 1.1(b)                           Purchaser Persons with Knowledge

Schedule 4.4                              Governmental Approvals

Schedule 4.5                              Litigation

Schedule 4.6(a)                           Non-Contravention
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7502

JAIME REYES SOTO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SIDNEY HARKLEROAD, Superintendent, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-1122-1) Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 17, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jaime Reyes Soto, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jaime Reyes Soto seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Soto has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 17, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 17, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0511. AZIZA BOUTALEB SIMMONS v. DONALD KARL SIMMONS. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2014V0203