alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.3
    1 4




---



##### 



ARTICLE 1
DEFINITIONS
 General.
   ARTICLE 2
ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS
 Assumption of Obligations.
 ARTICLE 3
MISCELLANEOUS
 Parties.
 Ratification of Indenture; Supplemental Indentures Part of Indenture.
 Trust Indenture Act Controls.
 Severability.
 2




---



##### 



Headings.
 Trustee Disclaimer.
 Governing Law
 THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
 Counterparts.
 [Signature pages follow]




---



##### 



NOVELIS INC.By:
    /s/ Steven R. FisherName:
    Steven R. FisherTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerTHE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY,
N.A., as TrusteeBy:
    /s/ Lee Ann WillisName:
    Lee Ann WillisTitle:
    Senior Associate
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.                                                                     /s/ William J. Ryan   Name:  William J. Ryan   Title:  Chief Executive Officer   Date: November 9, 2005Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to TD Banknorth Inc. and will be retained by TD Banknorth Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
Verio Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in (i) the registration statements
(Nos. 333-57059 and 333-59451) on Form S-8, and (ii) the registration statement
(No. 333-91051) on Form S-3 of Verio Inc., of our reports, dated March 9,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Verio Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule,
which reports appear in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of
Verio Inc.




                                       KPMG LLP



Denver, Colorado
March 23, 2000
Robert Daniel ALLEN v. STATE

CR-16-1233

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code), the undersigned officer of Vornado Realty Trust, the sole generalpartner of Vornado Realty L.P. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004**(the “Report”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.  

 

 
| March 9,  2005 | /s/    | Joseph  Macnow                                                                                          |   |
|----------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|           | Name:  | Joseph  Macnow                                                                                          |
|           | Title: | Chief Financial  Officer of Vornado Realty Trust, the  sole general partner of Vornado Realty L.P. |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, F. Morgan Gasior, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                             |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|/s/ F. MORGAN GASIOR                                         |  |  |  | Dated: August 7, 2007
|F. Morgan Gasior                                             |  |  |  |                      
|Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |  |  |  |                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 2 TO HUAWEI’S MOTION TO SEAL 

(JX-027) 

PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 1 of 9
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 2 of 9
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 3 of 9
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 4 of 9
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 5 of 9
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 6 of 9
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 7 of 9
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 8 of 9
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1228-1 Filed 01/10/19 Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT 4.2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO INDENTURE

 

	This First Amendment to Indenture (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of February 12, 1999 by and between MMI Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A., a national association formed under the laws of the United States (the "Trustee").

 

RECITALS:

	WHEREAS, the Company and the Trustee, pursuant to Section 9.1(i) of the Indenture, desire to amend the Indenture entered into by and between them on April 16, 1997 (the "Indenture"), as provided in this Amendment;

	NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

	1.	Amendment of Indenture.  The Company and the Trustee hereby acknowledge and agree that the second paragraph of the first page of the Indenture is hereby deleted and is replaced in its entirety by the following paragraph:

	The Company and the Trustee agree as follows for the equal and ratable benefit of the Holders of the 11 1/4% Series A Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 (the "Series A Notes") and the 11 1/4% Series B Senior Subordinated Notes (the "Series B Notes" and, together with the Series A Notes and such other notes as may from time to time be issued pursuant to Section 2.2 of this Indenture, the "Notes"):

	2.	Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, as applied to contracts made and performed within the State of New York.

	3.	Counterparts.  The parties hereto may sign any number of copies or counterparts of this Amendment.  Each signed copy or counterpart shall be an original, but each of them together shall represent the same agreement.

 

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.

 

						MMI PRODUCTS, INC.

						By:	/s/ Julius S. Burns			
						Name:	Julius S. Burns			
						Title:	President				
 

						U.S. TRUST COMPANY OF TEXAS, N.A.

						By:	/s/ Bill Barber				
						Name:	Bill Barber				
						Title:	Vice President
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NOS. WR-82,771-01, WR- 82,771-02, WR-82,771- 03, WR-82,771-04 & WR-82,771-05

EX P ARTE RODOLFO GARZ A, Applicant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 07-342, 07-343, 10-109, 10-110 & 10-111

IN THE 130 DISTRICT COURT

T H F ROM MA TAGORD A COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code o f C ri m i n al Procedur e, the cl er k o f t h e t ri al court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habea s corpus. E x parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of tampering wi t h ev i d ence, three ag g ravated robberies, and two char g es of eng ag ing in org anized criminal activity
. He was sentenc ed to ten year s’ imprisonment for tampering with evidenc e, and to thirty -five y ear s’ imprisonment in each of the re maining c ases. He did not appeal his convic tions. Applicant contends, among other things, that two of his sentenc es are illega l, and th a t c ounsel
was ineffe ctive for allowing him to plead guilty and true in exchang e for illega l sentenc es. We2

rema nded this application to the trial court for supplemental finding s of fac t and conclusions of law. Trial counsel filed aff

idavits with the trial court. Ba sed on the aff idavits and testimony from
a live hear ing, the trial court deter mined that the case s wer e part of a “pac kag e deal,” and Applicant’s pleas wer e involuntary
. Applicant is entitled to relief
. Ex parte Huerta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); Ex parte Cox , 482 S.W .3d 112 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). Relief is g rante d. The judgme nts in Cause Nos. 07-342, 07-343, 10-109, 10-110, and 10-111 in the 130 District Court of Matag orda County are set as i d e, an d Applicant is rema nded to the t h custody of the Sheriff of Matag orda County to answe r the charg es as set out in the indictments and motions to adjudicate
. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench war rant within 10 day s afte r the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment o f Crim in a l Ju s ti c e
– Co r rec tional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Deliver ed: May

4, 2016 Do not publish
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 251 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on future international arms control 

agreements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 27, 2021 

Mr. DAINES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate on future international 

arms control agreements. 

Whereas the United States and the former Soviet Union 

signed the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty 

(commonly referred to as the ‘‘INF Treaty’’), which entered into force on June 1, 1988, for the purposes of 

strengthening international peace and security and avoiding the devastating consequences of nuclear war; 

Whereas the INF Treaty required the United States and the 

former Soviet Union, the 2 dominant world powers at the 

time, to eliminate their ground-launched ballistic and 

cruise missiles with ranges of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers (between 300 and 3,400 miles) by an implementation deadline of June 1, 1991; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 251 IS 

Whereas, by that deadline, both countries destroyed a total 

of 2,692 short- and intermediate-range missiles, with the 

former Soviet Union destroying 1,846 such missiles and 

the United States destroying 846 such missiles; 

Whereas the United States upheld the terms of the INF 

Treaty for more than 3 decades; 

Whereas the Russian Federation violated the terms of the 

INF Treaty by developing, producing, and testing the 

SSC–8/9M729, a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) 

with a range of 2,500 kilometers; 

Whereas, in December 2019, the United States withdrew 

from the INF Treaty upon finding the Russian Federation in material breach of the treaty, with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization concurring in the finding; and 

Whereas, during the period in which the INF Treaty was in 

effect, the People’s Republic of China developed, produced, and tested an arsenal of an estimated 200 intermediate-range, 150 medium-range, 250 short-range, and 

54 ground-launched ballistic missiles: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any 

2 international arms control agreement entered into by the 

3 United States that limits the number of allowable nuclear4 capable missiles must— 

5 (1) be subject to the advice and consent of the 

6 Senate; and 

7 (2) include the Russian Federation and the 

8 People’s Republic of China. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 60 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education 

relating to ‘‘Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection 

Criteria-Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); Grants 

to Charter Management Organizations for the Replication and Expansion 

of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter 

School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and for 

the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer Grants)’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. BURR, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. WICKER, Mr. 

YOUNG, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. PAUL, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the 

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Education relating to ‘‘Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection CriteriaExpanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools 

Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity 

Grants); Grants to Charter Management Organizations 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 60 IS 

for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter School 

Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and 

for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer Grants)’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Education relating to ‘‘Final Priorities, Re5 quirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria-Expanding 

6 Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools Program 

7 (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); 

8 Grants to Charter Management Organizations for the 

9 Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter 

10 Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter School De11 velopers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and for 

12 the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter 

13 Schools (Developer Grants)’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 40406; pub14 lished July 6, 2022), and such rule shall have no force 

15 or effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2018225EN.01000101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 225/1 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2017/2455 of 5 December 2017 amending Directive 2006/112/EC and Directive 2009/132/EC as regards certain value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 348 of 29 December 2017](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2017_348_R_TOC)
)

On page 18, in point (30) of Article 2, in point (e) of the new Article 369p(3):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(e) | his individual identification number allocated in accordance with Article 369q(3).’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(e) | his individual identification number allocated in accordance with Article 369q(2).’. |

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2017

No. 04-16-00186-CV

COTTER & SONS, INC.; James F. Cotter; Alamo Towers-Cotter, LLC; Cotter 11211 Katy 

Freeway Building, LP; Cotter 7447 Harwin Building, LP; Cotter Equities LLC; Cotter Harwin 

Equities LLC; Cotter Katy Equities LLC; Cotter Katy Freeway Building, LP; Et Al.,

Appellants

v.

BJ CORPORATION D/B/A NATIONAL BUILDING SERVICE,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-09427

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this appeal, Appellant Alamo Towers—Cotter, LLC filed a suggestion of bankruptcy. 

The suggestion discloses that Appellant filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy in the United 

States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas under Case No. 17-52599-cag on 

November 6, 2017. See 11 U.S.C. § 362 (2012); TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1. 

Accordingly, this appeal and all time periods under the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure are stayed from the date the bankruptcy petition was filed in the bankruptcy court. 

See 11 U.S.C. § 362 (“Automatic stay”); TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

This appeal is ABATED. For administrative purposes, the appeal will be treated as a 

closed case unless and until it is reinstated in accordance with Rule 8.3 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 24.3

Power of Attorney of Fred C. Davison


STATE OF GEORGIA

COUNTY OF COBB


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Fred C. Davison, a Director of
     EDUTREK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia corporation, do constitute and
     appoint Steve Bostic and Donald J. Blankers, jointly and severally, my
     true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution
     and resubstitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign the
     Annual Report on Form 10-K for EDUTREK INTERNATIONAL, INC. for the
     fiscal year ended May 31, 1998, pursuant to the requirements of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
     and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf
     and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said
     Annual Report, incorporating such changes as any of the said
     attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming
     all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or
     substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 26th day of 
August 1998.


                                       /s/   Fred C. Davison
                                       ---------------------
                                       Fred C. Davison




                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                 --------------

BEFORE me this 26th day of August 1998, came Fred C. Davison, personally known
       to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing
       Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                                       /s/   Cynthia Gardere
                                       ---------------------
                                       NOTARY PUBLIC


                                       State of Georgia

                                       My Commission Expires:
  
                                       September 11, 1999
                                       ------------------
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 24 (Thursday, February 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02309]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE648]

Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Pacific Council) 
Habitat Committee (HC) will hold an online public meeting.

DATES: The online meeting will be held Tuesday, February 25 and 
Wednesday, February 26, 2025, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Pacific Time 
each day, or until business for the day has been completed.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held online. Specific meeting 
information, including a proposed agenda and instructions on how to 
attend the meeting and system requirements, will be provided in the 
meeting announcement on the Pacific Council's website (see 
www.pcouncil.org). You may send an email to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt 
([email protected]) or contact him at (503) 820-2412 for 
technical assistance.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE 
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerry Griffin, Staff Officer, Pacific 
Council; telephone: (503) 820-2409.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this online meeting is for 
the HC to consider items on the Pacific Council's March meeting agenda 
and to prepare supplemental reports as necessary. Topics will include 
current habitat issues, fishing regulation changes at Cordell Bank 
(California), Marine Planning, the California Current Ecosystem Status 
Report & Science Review, and other topics as necessary.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may be discussed, those issues may not be the subject of formal action 
during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those issues 
specifically listed in this document and any issues arising after 
publication of this document that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the intent to 
take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt 
([email protected]; (503) 820-2412) at least 10 days prior to 
the meeting date.

    Dated: February 3, 2025.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-02309 Filed 2-5-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```