alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION OF THE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Mark W. Legg, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of American Reprographics Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2005 /s/  Mark W. LeggChief Financial Officer and Secretary 27
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 15, 2019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY 

OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 15, 2019

Re: Dkt. Nos. 1289, 1290

Before the Court are the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) high priority objections 

(“HPO”) and responses, ECF No. 1290, and Qualcomm Inc.’s (“Qualcomm”) HPOs and 

responses, ECF No. 1289, for January 15, 2019, day 6 of the trial. Having considered the parties’ 

briefs, the relevant law, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the record in this case, and balancing the 

factors set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules as follows:

FTC Objections Ruling

Irwin Jacobs, former Qualcomm

FTC HPO #1: QX9205

OVERRULED, but “quotes from or 

summaries of portions of newspaper articles, 

websites, press releases, or emails” may not be 

introduced for the truth of the matter asserted.

Yooseok Kim, Samsung

FTC HPO #2: QX0562

SUSTAINED.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1309 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 15, 2019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Ira Blumberg, Lenovo

FTC HPO #3: Blumberg Dep. 110:6-21, 

112:3-113:4

SUSTAINED. 

Isabel Mahe, Apple 

FTC HPO #4: QX1464 OVERRULED as to Mahe’s email, but 

SUSTAINED as to the emails drafted by 

Mucke, Schell, and Mansfield. The parties 

must redact QX1464 so that it includes only 

Mahe’s email. 

Mahe Dep., 124:9-14, 125:12-13 OVERRULED.

Thomas Lindner, Intel 

FTC HPO #5: QX0113 OVERRULED as to Sauer’s email, but 

SUSTAINED as to emails drafted by Martin, 

Zhang, Eggers, and Hanke. The parties must 

redact QX0113 so that it includes only Sauer’s 

email. 

Qualcomm Objections

Andrew Hong, Samsung 

Qualcomm HPO #1: Hong Dep. 249:9-16 SUSTAINED. 

Nanfen Yu, Huawei

Qualcomm HPO #2: Yu Dep. 70:20-71:10 OVERRULED. 

Irwin Jacobs, former Qualcomm

Qualcomm HPO #3: CX6823

Qualcomm HPO #4: CX7991

OVERRULED without prejudice as to 

CX6823 and CX7991. The FTC may seek to 

lay a foundation at trial. If the FTC cannot do 

so, Qualcomm’s objection will be sustained. 

Qualcomm HPO #5: CX8267 SUSTAINED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1309 Filed 01/14/19 Page 2 of 2
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 4, 2014

No. 04-13-00750-CR

Larry CASTRO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0307A

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s motion to stay disposition is granted. This appeal will not be submitted for 

decision by the court before July 4, 2014, unless appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
C.S.O. v. STATE

CR-15-0177

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing
Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the "Managing Owner"), of World
Monitor Trust III ("the Trust"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
      2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Trust.


/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer
-----------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth A. Shewer
Co-Chief Executive Officer of
Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the Managing Owner of
World Monitor Trust III
May 16, 2005






                                     E-4
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 21
- 00095
- CV

__________________ IN RE DUANE T. CORLEY

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding County Court at Law No. 2 of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19
- 12
- 16524
- CV

__________________________________________________________________ O RDER
On May 6 , 2021, we stayed all further proceedings in the trial court pending the resolution of this original proceeding, in which relator seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Hon orable Claudia Laird, Judge of the County Court at Law No. 2, to set aside her order granting the motion for new trial filed by the real parties in interest, Jamie Fernandez and Charles Ciaramitaro

. On May 27, 2021 , relator Duane T. Corley filed a motion to lift the stay for the limited purpose of allowing the trial court to consider and sign, if appropriate, an order setting aside its order of April 23, 2021 , which granted a new trial

. The alleged basis for this motion is that the parties have reached an agreement to resolve relator’s2 claims, and once the trial court signs an Order setting asi de its new trial order, the relator will file a motion to dismiss this mandamus proceeding. Relator’s motion for relief from the stay is granted. It is ORDERED that th is
Court’s Order staying all further proceedings in trial court case numbe r 19

- 12

- 16524

- CV , Duane T. Corley v. Jamie Fernandez and Charles Ciaramitaro , is hereby lifted for the limited purpose of the trial court’s consideration and signing, if appropriate, of an order setting aside its order of April 23, 2021, which granted a new trial

. The Court withdraws its request for a response by the real parties in interest to the petition for writ of mandamus until further Order of this Court.
ORDER EN TERED June 8 , 20 21

.

PER CURI AM

Before Golemon, C .J. , Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 32 PageID 14
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 32 PageID 15
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 3 of 32 PageID 16
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 4 of 32 PageID 17
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 5 of 32 PageID 18
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 6 of 32 PageID 19
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 7 of 32 PageID 20
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 8 of 32 PageID 21
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 9 of 32 PageID 22
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 10 of 32 PageID 23
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 11 of 32 PageID 24
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 12 of 32 PageID 25
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 13 of 32 PageID 26
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 14 of 32 PageID 27
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 15 of 32 PageID 28
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 16 of 32 PageID 29
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 17 of 32 PageID 30
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 18 of 32 PageID 31
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 19 of 32 PageID 32
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 20 of 32 PageID 33
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 21 of 32 PageID 34
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 22 of 32 PageID 35
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 23 of 32 PageID 36
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 24 of 32 PageID 37
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 25 of 32 PageID 38
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 26 of 32 PageID 39
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 27 of 32 PageID 40
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 28 of 32 PageID 41
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 29 of 32 PageID 42
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 30 of 32 PageID 43
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 31 of 32 PageID 44
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01817-D Document 4 Filed 10/27/05 Page 32 of 32 PageID 45
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ANDREW WILSON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 442 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of February, 2016, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certifications Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NationalHealth Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “report”), I, David M. Daniels, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and I, Alex Soufflas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, dohereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

 
| (1)    |   | the report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |

 

 
| Dated:  November 14, 2008 |   /s/ David M. Daniels |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                           | David  M. Daniels           |
|                           | Chief  Executive Officer    |
|                           |                        |
|                           |                        |
| Dated:  November 14, 2008 |   /s/ Alex Soufflas    |
|                           | Alex  Soufflas              |
|                           | Chief  Financial Officer    |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KYLE J. STEVENS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 798 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of May, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
----

----

| Company                                          |   | State      / Province of Incorporation |   | Date      of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| Organic      Recycling Technologies (China) Inc. |   | China,      Guangdong                  |   | February      14, 2006     |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| Organic      Recycling Technologies, Ltd.        |   | British      Columbia                  |   | June      20, 2003         |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| Organic      Recycling Management, Inc.          |   | British      Columbia                  |   | June      20, 2003         |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| Duro      Enzyme Solutions Inc.                  |   | Canadian      Corporation              |   | August      10, 2000       |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| EASI      Studio Inc.                            |   | British      Columbia, Canada          |   | June      20, 2003         |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| SuperNet      Computing Inc.                     |   | British      Columbia, Canada          |   | June      20, 2003         |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| EASI      Games Inc.                             |   | British      Columbia, Canada          |   | June      20, 2003         |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| EASI      Education Inc.                         |   | Alberta,      Canada                   |   | May      30, 2003          |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| EASI      Movies, Music TV Inc.                  |   | British      Columbia, Canada          |   | June      20, 2003         |
|                                             |   |                                   |   |                       |
| EAPI      Center Inc.                            |   | Manitoba,      Canada                  |   | September      5,2003      |
QX2778 

REDACTED VERSION 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 1 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 2 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 3 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 4 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 5 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 6 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 7 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 8 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 9 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 10 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 11 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 12 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 13 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 14 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 15 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 16 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 17 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 18 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 19 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 20 of 21
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1414 Filed 01/24/19 Page 21 of 21
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 

FILED

AUG 24 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

RUSSELL AINSWORTH; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 18-16197

D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00077-KAW

U.S. District Court for Northern 

California, Oakland

ORDER

A review of the docket demonstrates that appellant has failed to respond to 

the July 3, 2018 order of this court.

Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to 

prosecute. 

This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the 

order, act as the mandate of this court.

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Cyntharee K. Powells

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 4:17-cv-00077-KAW Document 117 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 1 Case: 18-16197, 08/24/2018, ID: 10989501, DktEntry: 4, Page 1 of 1
# L_2017058EN.01000101.xml

| 4.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 58/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/374

of 3 March 2017

implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (1), and in particular Article 14(1) and (4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 5 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 208/2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 5 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 208/2014.

| (2) | On the basis of a review by the Council, the entry for one person listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 should be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review by the Council, the entry for one person listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 should be deleted.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2017.

For the Council

The President

M. FARRUGIA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, the entry relating to the following person is deleted:

| 16. | Yuriy Volodymyrovych Ivanyushchenko |
| --- | --- |

16.

Yuriy Volodymyrovych Ivanyushchenko

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Alpha
Motorsport, Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Markovitch, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.



Date:  November 18, 2005        /s/ John Markovitch, Jr.
                              -----------------------------------------
                              By: John Markovitch, Jr., Chief Financial
                              Officer and Principal Accounting Officer












<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Helios and Matheson North America Inc., on a consolidated
basis.
  Date:      March 15, 2011
    /s/ Umesh AhujaName:
    Umesh AhujaTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)