alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20554

OFFICE OF
MANAGING DIRECTOR February 2016

Re: Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act

Dear Contractors,

In September 2013, the Department of Labor Office of Federal Contract Compliance
Programs (OFCCP) published a Final Rule that makes changes to the regulations implementing
Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 503). Section 503 prohibits federal
contractors and subcontractors from discriminating in employment against individuals with
disabilities and requires that federal contractors and subcontractors take action to recruit, employ,
train, and promote qualified individuals with disabilities. In the 2013 changes to Section 503,
OFCCP established a 7% utilization goal for qualified IWDs.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has made compliance with the new
guidance regarding Section 503 a high priority. To this end, the FCC has the strong expectation
that contractors will review and implement the guidance in Section 503 when doing business
with the FCC. Detailed information on Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act is available at the
websites of the Department of Labor, the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations.
In addition, we have included a link to the Department of Labor’s helpful short video entitled
“Disability Inclusion Starts With You” (https://blog.dol.qov/2015/10/13/disability-inclusion-starts-
with-you/). We encourage you to share this video with your workforce.

This initiative is extremely important to the FCC. The FCC is dedicated to supporting the
goals and implementation of Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act. We request that all potential
contractors take the time to review the aforementioned provisions and act in a manner that
advances the goals of recruiting, employing, training and promoting qualified workforce
contributors with disabilities. The FCC sincerely appreciates your interest and contribution.

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Dawn DiGiorigo;
Dawn.DiGiorigo@fec.gov.

anaging Director
Case 3:05-cv-02028-B Document 19 Filed 08/09/06 Page 1 of 6 PageID 61
Case 3:05-cv-02028-B Document 19 Filed 08/09/06 Page 2 of 6 PageID 62
Case 3:05-cv-02028-B Document 19 Filed 08/09/06 Page 3 of 6 PageID 63
Case 3:05-cv-02028-B Document 19 Filed 08/09/06 Page 4 of 6 PageID 64
Case 3:05-cv-02028-B Document 19 Filed 08/09/06 Page 5 of 6 PageID 65
Case 3:05-cv-02028-B Document 19 Filed 08/09/06 Page 6 of 6 PageID 66
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof The Wornick Company (the “Company”) for the thirteen week period ended October 1,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Michael M. Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 15, 2005 |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
|                         | By:    | /s/ Michael M. Thompson |   |
|                         |   | Michael M. Thompson |
|                         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Christy L. Shaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Christy L. ShafferChristy L. Shaffer Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 6, 2003
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 12, 2001 accompanying the financial
statements of 800 Travel Systems, Inc. that is included in the Company's Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of 800
Travel Systems, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-28237, effective July 31, 2000,
File No. 333-45488, effective September 15, 2000) and Forms S-8 (File No.
333-68973, effective December 15, 1998, File No. 333-78745, effective May 19,
1999 and File No. 333-45484, effective September 8, 2000).

GRANT THORNTON LLP



Tampa, Florida
March 28, 2001
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden West Brewing Company, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John C. Power, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   _/s/ John C. Power_____________ John C. Power, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer May 15, 2008
Exhibit 31.3
 I, Christopher E. Kubasik, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 of L3 Technologies, Inc.;
            and
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
            statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 Date: April 30, 2019/s/ Christopher E. KubasikChristopher E. KubasikChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
# m8609.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.9.2017 C(2017) 6442 final To t he notifying parties Subject : Case M. 8609 – TRITON / UNIHOLD / UNICA GROEP Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 25 August 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Triton Managers IV Limited and TFF IV Limited, in their capacity as general partners of Triton Fund IV, part of the Triton Group (‘Triton’, Channel Islands), and UniHold B.V. (‘ UniHold ’, The Netherlands) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Unica Groep B.V. (‘ Unica ’, The Netherlands), previously solely controlled by UniHold , by way of a purchase of shares. 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Triton: private equity investment firm dedicated to investing in European-based businesses in a variety of business sectors. - for UniHold : holding and financing company with interests in heat and cold storage (ATES) installations and tec h nical services. - for Unica : provision of mechanical, electrical and ICT technical services, such as installation and maintenance services. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 295 , 6 . 9 . 2017 , p. 5 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Sean CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3389

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2019]

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. David Jerome MANNING, Jr.

No. 2018-KH-0614

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF OUACHITA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of *759the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
IN RE: Appeal of the DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO: 18-PDB-088

NO. 2019-OB-0288

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

Leave to appeal denied.
Matthew LOVETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3777

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 21, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce Merati, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of VirtGame Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and I have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this reported my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period
covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control
over financial reporting.


March 30, 2004                             /s/  Bruce Merati
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Bruce Merati, Chief Executive Officer
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 15, 2010 |                        |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                               | /s/ Mark D. Roberson        |
|                               | Mark D. Roberson            |
|                               | Chief Executive Officer and |
|                               | Chief Financial Officer     |
### IN THE COURT OF APP EALS OF TENNESS EE AT JAC KSON Fe bruary15, 200 5 S es sio n SA ND RA LEE BUE TTN ER v. N EIL WILLIA M BU ETTN ER

Chancery Court

for Henry County No. 17787

No. W2004-01788-C OA-R3-C V - F iled Jun e 2, 2005

PARTIAL DISSE NT AND PARTIAL CONCURR ENCE

I mus t r e sp e c tf

ull y dis se nt f ro m th e ma

jority ’s ho ldi ng that th e resh ou ld b e no inc re a se in alimony upon the y oung er c hild reac hing theag e of ma jority . As the majority

states, the various provisions of the contra ct must be construe d toge ther, and we should see k to asce rtain the i n t en t i o n o f t h e p ar t i es b as ed u p o n th e u s u al , n at u ra l , an do rd i n ar y m ea n i n g o f t h e l an gu age employ ed. Rea ding the provisions of the MDA, it is my interpre tation that the intention of the a g re e me nt i s c le arl y

se t ou t th a t “ a s each ch i l dre ac h es 1 8 y ears o f a ge o r gr ad u at es fr o mh i gh school or should have done so, whiche ver is the last to occ ur, the de fendant will have to beg in an a dd iti on a l a lim on y

in f utu ro pay me nt a s h e re in b e fo rec a lc ulate d. ” (E mph a sis a dd e d) . T his provision, coupled with the express provision of the MDAstating “ furthermore, this obligation or these pay ments areto be made r eg ardle ss of who the c hild is l iving with or w ho may have custody of the c hildren whe n the child re ache s or should have r eac hed 18 y ear s of ag e or g raduates from hig h school,” indicates to this member of the Court that the oblig ation for additional alimony

is not gove rned by

whether Mr. B uettner w ould have any child support ob lig a tio n p a y ablebu t is g ov e rn e d b y wh a t hewo uldha ve a n o bli g a tio n f or in the way

of c hil d su pp ort ba se d u po n th e g uid e lin e s. I w o u l dh o l dth a tM s . B u e t t n e r i s e n t i t l e dt o a d d i t i o n a l a l i m o n y o f f i f t y p e r c e n to f

t w e n t yon e pe rc e nt o f h is n e t in c ome , a s d e fi ne d b y theg uid e lin e s. I c on c ur in the Op ini onin all o the r r e sp e c ts.

_________________________________________ W. FRANK CRA WFOR D, PRE S ID IN G JU DG E, W .S.
Darren Lee WHARTON v. STATE of Mississippi

2017-CT-00441-SCT

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: April 8, 2019 Closed: June 27, 2019

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 21 (Monday, February 3, 2025)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 8753-8754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02176]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 90 , No. 21 / Monday, February 3, 2025 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 8753]]

                Memorandum of January 24, 2025

                
The Mexico City Policy

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary 
                of Defense[,] the Secretary of Health and Human 
                Services[, and] the Administrator of the United States 
                Agency for International Development

                I hereby revoke the Presidential Memorandum of January 
                28, 2021, for the Secretary of State, the Secretary of 
                Defense, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 
                and the Administrator of the United States Agency for 
                International Development (Protecting Women's Health at 
                Home and Abroad), and reinstate the Presidential 
                Memorandum of January 23, 2017, for the Secretary of 
                State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and 
                the Administrator of the United States Agency for 
                International Development (The Mexico City Policy).

                I direct the Secretary of State, in coordination with 
                the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to the 
                extent allowable by law, to implement a plan to extend 
                the requirements of the reinstated Memorandum to global 
                health assistance furnished by all departments or 
                agencies.

                I further direct the Secretary of State to take all 
                necessary actions, to the extent permitted by law, to 
                ensure that U.S. taxpayer dollars do not fund 
                organizations or programs that support or participate 
                in the management of a program of coercive abortion or 
                involuntary sterilization.

                This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, 
                create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 
                enforceable at law or in equity by any party against 
                the United States, its departments, agencies, or 
                entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any 
                other person.

[[Page 8754]]

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 24, 2025

[FR Doc. 2025-02176
Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
```
EX PARTE Eric Vernardo ODOM

CR-17-0321

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
EX PARTE TTR CONSTRUCTION, LLC, et al.

1160951 (2160678)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                 CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Echelon Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Tay, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: April 15, 2005


/s/ William Tay
-------------------------------------------
William Tay, President
(principal executive officer and principal
 accounting officer)
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ   Document 331   Filed 02/18/09   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ   Document 331   Filed 02/18/09   Page 2 of 2
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No

. 04 -0 9- 00 03 8- CV Da nie l CE RV AN TES , Appellant

v . A m y CE RV AN TES , Appellee Fr om the 224th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI -13303 Honora ble Andy Mireles, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Marc h 4, 2009 DI SMI SSED Ap pe lla nt h a s f ile d a mot ion ind ic a tin g that th e partie s h a ve fu lly re so lve d a

nd se ttl e d a ll iss ue s in dis pu te . B e c a

us e the pa

rt ies have r e a c he d a

fi na l se ttl e me nt o f a ll i ssu e s r a ise d in thi s appea l, appellant asks that we dismiss this appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)( 1). Appe llant’s motion to di smiss i s g rante d, an d t h i s appea l is dism issed. Costs of appeal a re ta x ed ag ainst the appellant. See id. at (d).

PER CU RI AM