alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert N. Tenczar, as Chief Financial Officer of MMI Products, Inc. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Form 10-K as amended by this Form 10-K/A report for the period ending January 3, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated:  September 7, 2004 | By:  /s/ Robert N. Tenczar       
|------------------------- | ---------------------------------
|                          | Robert N. Tenczar, Vice President
|                          | and Chief Financial Officer of   
|                          | MMI Products, Inc.               
|                          |
<PAGE>


                                                      Exhibit 10.29



          List of Contents of Exhibits to the Renewal Rights Agreement



       Exhibits                          Description
       --------                          -----------

Exhibit A                            List of Royal Insurer Affiliates

Exhibit B                            Form of Letter to Policyholders
EX PARTE Robert Shawn INGRAM

CR-17-0186

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Exhibit 32

Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2006                  |  |  |  | Date: March 16, 2006                                
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Samuel K. Ackerman                |  |  |  | /s/ Peyton J. Marshall                              
|Samuel K. Ackerman, M.D.              |  |  |  | Peyton J. Marshall, Ph.D.                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Syntel, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Bharat Desai, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Arvind Godbole, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Information Security Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bharat Desai                                 
|Bharat Desai                                     
|Syntel, Inc. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|March 11, 2008                                   
|                                                 
|/s/ Arvind Godbole                               
|Arvind Godbole                                   
|Syntel, Inc. Chief Financial Officer             
|& Chief Information Security Officer             
|March 11, 2008                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

E-filed 6/14/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AARON FOSTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUITYKEY REAL ESTATE 

INVESTMENTS L.P.,

Defendant.

Case No.17-cv-00067-HRL 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On May 9, 2017, the court issued an order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss as to all 

claims. Dkt. No. 22. The court granted Plaintiff leave to amend several claims and stated: 

“Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 21 days . . . . Failure to do so will result in 

dismissal of the complaint with prejudice.” Id. More than 21 days have passed and plaintiff has 

not filed an amended complaint. The court therefore orders Plaintiff to appear in Courtroom 2, 

Fifth Floor of the United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California on July 

18, 2017, at 10:00 AM and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed. Plaintiff 

may file a statement in response to this Order to Show Cause no later than July 11, 2017. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 6/14/2017

HOWARD R. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                        Subsidiaries of ChoicePoint Inc.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Name                                   State or Country of Incorporation
      ----                                   ---------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>
ChoicePoint Services Inc.                                  Georgia
PRC Corporation                                            Georgia
Professional Test Administrators, Inc.                     Illinois
Intellisys, Inc.                                           Georgia
CDB Infotek                                                California
Innovative Data Services, Inc.                             Delaware
Application Profiles Inc.                                  Georgia
ChoicePoint Business and Government Services Inc.          Georgia
Osborn Group Inc.                                          Delaware
Mid-American Technologies, Inc.                            Kansas
Applied BioConcepts Inc.                                   Kansas
Osborn Laboratories (Canada) Inc.                          Canada
ChoicePoint Limited                                    United Kingdom
Customer Development Corporation                           Illinois
National Credit Audit Corporation                          Illinois
Optimum Graphics Printing, Inc.                            Illinois
Financial Database Services Company                        Illinois
Customer Database Technologies, Inc.                       Illinois
CDC Realty LLC                                             Delaware
EquiSearch Services Inc.                                   Georgia
DATEQ Information Network, Inc.                            Georgia
</TABLE>
#### Muhammad DOZA; Rokeya Khanam; Mohammed Shamsuddoha; Mohammed Sadrulula; Mosammat Jabunnesa; Mohammed Mohiuddin, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-1157.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 2004.

Decided: May 19, 2004.

Joseph J. Rose, Law Office of Joseph J. Rose, New York, New York, for Petitioners.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, William C. Peachey, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Doza,1 a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of an *916order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum and withholding of removal. Doza disputes the IJ’s negative credibility finding and asserts that he established his eligibility for asylum.

Upon our review of the administrative record, we find that substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Doza failed to establish eligibility for the relief sought. 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (1994);28 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b) (2003); *Figeroa v. INS,*886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir.1989). Doza thus cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of deportation. *See INS v. Cardozcir-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*

1

. Also listed as Petitioners dependent on Doza’s application for relief are Doza's wife, Rokeya Khanam, and four sons, Mohammed Shamsuddoha, Mohammed Sadrulula, Mosammat Jabunnesa, and Mohammed Mohiuddin.

2

*.*We note that 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) was repealed by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) effective April 1, 1997. Because this case was in transition at the time the IIRIRA was passed, 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) is still applicable under the terms of the transitional rules contained in § 309(c) of the IIRIRA.
Case No. 17-cv-00220 LHK (NC) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et 

al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00220 LHK (NC)

ORDER INSTRUCTING 

QUALCOMM TO FILE 

DECLARATION

Re: Dkt. No. 249

Qualcomm is ORDERED to file the declaration referred to in footnote 9 to the 

parties’ joint discovery letter regarding document number Q2014FTC02856622. This 

declaration must be filed by November 7, 2017, at noon.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6, 2017 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 271 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            256,907
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          2,547,897
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                        0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     2,684,039
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         12,007,456
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           11,980,618
<LOANS>                                        14,799,787
<ALLOWANCE>                                       208,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 33,796,660
<DEPOSITS>                                     28,405,775
<SHORT-TERM>                                    1,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               347,090
<LONG-TERM>                                     2,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 33,796,660
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 1,176,149
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               1,021,953
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   90,343
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                2,288,445
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              1,246,448
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,345,019
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             943,426
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     136,039
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1,608)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 1,024,997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (131,588)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (131,588)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (64,460)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       3.08
<LOANS-NON>                                       744,163
<LOANS-PAST>                                      744,163
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                        0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   75,694
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       4,091
<RECOVERIES>                                        1,149
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 208,791
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**     The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, norshall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                              /s/ BRIAN E. FARLEY   Brian E. Farley   *President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)*   Dated:March 13, 2008     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to VNUSMedical Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                /s/ PETER OSBORNE   Peter Osborne   V*ice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)*   Dated:March 13, 2008     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to VNUSMedical Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Gerald Andre JOE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3366

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Daniel BEATY v. STATE

CR-16-0917

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 6/30/1999 FORM
10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>             0001040751
<NAME>            WALLSTREET RACING STABLES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>      1

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,478
<PP&E>                                          41,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           902
<OTHER-SE>                                        (952)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,305
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,098
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  243,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (100,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (100,789)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (100,789)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.11)


</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2017\5\Wiley - order directing filing.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WILLIE WILEY, JR.,

Defendant. /

No. CR 17-05 CRB

ORDER DIRECTING FILING

The government is hereby DIRECTED to file by close of business on Monday,

May 8, 2017, its explanation of the representations it made at the May 2, 2017 hearing in

light of the body camera footage played at the May 3, 2017 hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4, 2017 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6643

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Petitioner

- Appellee ,

v.
DUANE LETROY BERRY , Respondent

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. ( 5:20

- hc

- 02085

- M )

Submitted : August 24 , 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Duane Letroy Berry , Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6643 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Duane Letroy Berry seeks to appeal the district court’s scheduling order that also
denied as moot and denied his pro se motions issued in his pending civil commitment proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
and certain int erlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). The order Berry seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

A ccordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Berry’s motion s to
return property , to forward the record , and for a temporary administrative stay and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately p resented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6643 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2