alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Helios & Matheson North America Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, I, Salvatore M. Quadrino, the principal financial officer of Helios & Matheson North America Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Helios & Matheson North America Inc., on a consolidated basis.

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K.

Date: March 25, 2008


/s/ Salvatore M. QuadrinoName:


Salvatore M. QuadrinoTitle:


Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Asian Trends Media Holdings, Inc.





/s/ Zhi Jian Zeng
Date: August 14, 2012Zhi Jian Zeng

Chief Executive Officer and Director
Kendle
    International Inc.
    Subsidiary List
  Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of OrganizationAAC Consulting Group, Inc.

MarylandACER/EXCEL INC

New JerseyBeijing KendleWits Medical Consulting Co., Ltd.

ChinaDecisionLine Clinical Research Corporation

CanadaKendle Americas Holding Inc.

OhioKendle Americas Investment Inc.

OhioKendle Americas Management Inc.

OhioKendle Argentina S.R.L.

ArgentinaKendle Branches Limited

United KingdomKendle Brasil Servicios de Pesquisas Clinicas Ltda.

BrazilKendle Canada Inc.

CanadaKendle Chile Limitada

ChileKendle Clinical Development Services Limited

United KingdomKendle Colombia Ltda.

ColombiaKendle CTA Limited

United KingdomKendle Czech Republic s.r.o.

Czech RepublicKendle Delaware Inc.

DelawareKendle GmbH

GermanyKendle India Private Limited

IndiaKendle International B.V.

The NetherlandsKendle International CPU LLC

OhioKendle International Holdings Limited

United KingdomKendle International Holdings Pty Limited

AustraliaKendle International Israel Ltd.

IsraelKendle International Limited

United KingdomKendle International Ltda.

BrazilCharles River Laboratories Clinical Services Pty Limited

AustraliaKendle International s.r.o.

Czech RepublicKendle International SARL

FranceKendle International S.L.

SpainKendle International Sp. z o.o.

PolandKendle International SRL

ItalyKendle International, S.A. de C.V.

MexicoKendle NC Inc.

North CarolinaKendle Ontario Inc.

CanadaKendle Peru S.R.L.

PeruKendle Pte, Ltd

SingaporeKendle Pty Limited

AustraliaKendle R&D Pty Limited

AustraliaKendle R&D Unit Trust

AustraliaKendle Servicios, S.A. de C.V.

MexicoKendle South Africa (Proprietary) Limited

South AfricaKendle Sweden AB

SwedenKendle U.K. Limited

United KingdomKendle Unit Trust

AustraliaPharma Clinical Research Limited

United KingdomU-Gene Clinical Research B.V.

The NetherlandsU-Gene Research Biotechnology B.V.

The Netherlands
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Here Enterprises, Inc. - Exhibit 10.3






  PROMISSORY NOTE

	$30,000 U.S.	Due Date: no specific terms of repayment


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HERE ENTERPRISES, INC. (the “Borrower”), unconditionally promises to pay to the order of Mountain Equity LTD. (the “Lender”) the sum of $30,000 in United States of America funds, together with interest at the rate of 20% per annum, on the principal amount remaining unpaid, after as well as before demand or maturity or default, calculated on an annual basis (on the basis of a year of 365 days for the actual number of days elapsed) and payable on demand; PROVIDED that if the Borrower fails to pay on demand any payment of principal or interest on this note, then in such event the entire unpaid principal and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon shall become and be forthwith due and payable without presentment, notice, protest or demand or any kind (all of which are hereby expressly waived by the Borrower).

The Borrower hereby agrees that the proper law of this instrument is the law of the Province of British Columbia and that this instrument shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws thereof and the undersigned agrees that any legal suit, action or proceeding brought upon or arising out of or relating to this instrument may be instituted in the courts of such Province and the undersigned hereby accepts and irrevocably submits and attorns to the exclusive jurisdiction of the said courts and acknowledges their competence and agrees to be bound by any judgment thereof, provided that nothing herein shall limit the right of the Lender to bring proceedings against the Borrower elsewhere.

This Promissory Note is dated the 8th day of October 2008.

HERE ENTERPRISES, INC.

	Per:	 /s/ Simon Au	 
	 	Simon Au, Chairman
# m8579.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.8.2017 C(2017) 5842 final To the notifying part y Subject : Case M. 8579 – HGCAPITAL / VISMA Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 20 July 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which HgCapital (United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of the undertaking Visma AS (" Visma ") (Norway) by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for HgCapital : private equity investments . - for Visma : supply of software solutions . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( d ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
(Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 247 , 29 . 7 . 2017 , p. 5 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Edward M. Jamison and PatrickHartman each hereby certify as follows: 1. They are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,respectively, of Community Bancorp, a Nevada Corporation (the “Company”).  2. Based on their knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2008, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1(the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of this 6th day of May,2008.           /s/ Edward M. Jamison             **Edward M. Jamison**      **President and Chief Executive Officer**      **(Principal Executive Officer)**             /s/ Patrick Hartman             **Patrick Hartman**      **Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**      **(Principal Financial Officer)**  
37
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 15 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 15

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
   Comptroller of Currency relating to ``National Banks and Federal 
                   Savings Associations as Lenders''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency relating to 
``National Banks and Federal Savings Associations as Lenders'' (85 Fed. 
Reg. 68742 (October 30, 2020)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

            Passed the Senate May 11, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 15

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
   Comptroller of Currency relating to ``National Banks and Federal 
                   Savings Associations as Lenders''.
```
CROSSTEX ENERGY SERVICES, LP, Crosstex Lig, LLC and Crosstex Processing Services, LLC v. TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC

NO. 2019-CD-0923

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 7, 2019

Stay denied; writ denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.

GENOVESE, J., would deny stay and grant the writ.
Case 3:06-cr-00084-P Document 32 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 69
 

 Case 3:06-cr-00084-P Document 32 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 70
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00660-CR

Martin GONZALES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 650198

Honorable Michael De Leon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 11, 2022, appellant’s counsel Ms. Nicolette A. Saenz filed a letter/motion 

stating “[p]ursuant to Texas Rules [sic] of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), appellant requests that 

this Court dismiss this appeal upon this motion.” Rule 42.2(a) requires that a motion to dismiss 

a criminal appeal be signed by both the appellant and counsel. Furthermore, the motion does not 

contain a certificate of service. 

Because appellant did not sign the motion, it is DENIED. Ms. Saenz is ORDERED to 

file a motion to dismiss that complies with Rule 42.2(a) and contains the appropriate certificate 

of service no later than October 27, 2022.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVELYN BEATRIZ MEJIARODRIGUEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74405

Agency No. A098-263-612

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Evelyn Beatriz Mejia-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

FILED

NOV 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-74405

Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th

Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination

of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535

(9th Cir. 2004). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Zehatye v.

Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for

review.

We reject petitioner’s claim that she is eligible for asylum or withholding of

removal based upon an anti-gang political opinion or her membership in a

particular social group, namely, parties who refuse to join or be coerced by

criminal gangs. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir.

2008) (rejecting as a particular social group “young men in El Salvador resisting

gang violence,” and holding that general aversion to gangs is not a political

opinion”); see also Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740-41 (9th Cir. 2009)

(“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’

for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). Accordingly, because petitioner failed to

demonstrate she was or will be persecuted on account of a protected ground, we

deny the petition as to her asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Barrios

v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 856 (9th Cir. 2009).
3 08-74405

In her opening brief, petitioner failed to challenge the BIA’s denial of her 

gender or family social group claims, as well as her claim for CAT relief. See

Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not

specifically raised and argued are deemed waived). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Glenn JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2605

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Nicholas V. Chater, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-S Security Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 4, 2009



/s/ Nicolas V. ChaterNicolas V. Chater Chief Financial
Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 19, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40611

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BOBBIE MCCOY BURRESS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-11-ALL 

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bobbie McCoy Burress appeals his conviction for failure to

appear for service of sentence in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 3146(a)(2). Burress argues only that the evidence was

insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his failure

to appear was willful.

Because Burress properly moved for a judgment of acquittal

after the Government rested and at the close of the evidence, the

standard of review for his sufficiency challenge is “whether,
No. 04-40611

-2-

considering all the evidence in the light most favorable to the

verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have found that the

evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” United

States v. Mendoza, 226 F.3d 340, 343 (5th Cir. 2000).

Two days before he was to report to a facility in Fort

Worth, Texas, to begin serving his sentence, Burress was in Grand

Prairie, Texas. However, on the day he was to report, Burress’s

vehicle was traced to Wyoming; one day later, when he was taken

into custody by local law enforcement officials, Burress was in

Montana. As he was being taken into custody, Burress admitted

that he was supposed to have reported the previous day; however,

he explained that he had come to Montana to take care of

unspecified family business and that he was returning to Texas. 

Based upon this evidence, we conclude that a reasonable trier of

fact could have found that Burress acted willfully in failing to

report as ordered. See Mendoza, 226 F.3d at 343.

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Integrated Business Systems and
Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the twelve month period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, George E. Mendenhall, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|               |  |     |  |                                
|-------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------
|March 26, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ George E. Mendenhall       
|               |  |     |  |                                
|               |  |     |  | Name: George E. Mendenhall     
|               |  |     |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer,
|               |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and    
|               |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 42 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol on Thursday, July 14, 

2022, for the lying in honor of the remains of Hershel Woodrow ‘‘Woody’’ 

Williams, the last surviving Medal of Honor recipient for acts performed 

during World War II. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2022 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. TESTER, Mr. ROMNEY, Ms. 

DUCKWORTH, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. CRUZ, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. COTTON, 

Mr. CRAMER, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol on Thursday, July 14, 2022, for the lying in honor of the remains 

of Hershel Woodrow ‘‘Woody’’ Williams, the last surviving Medal of Honor recipient for acts performed during World War II. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF 

4 HONOR RECIPIENT OF WORLD WAR II. 

5 In recognition of Hershel Woodrow ‘‘Woody’’ Wil6 liams, the last surviving recipient of the Medal of Honor 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 42 ATS 

1 for acts performed during World War II, his remains shall 

2 be permitted to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol 

3 on Thursday, July 14, 2022, in order to honor the Great4 est Generation and the more than 16,000,000 men and 

5 women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 

6 States from 1941 to 1945. The Architect of the Capitol, 

7 under the direction of the President pro tempore of the 

8 Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

9 shall take all necessary steps for the accomplishment of 

10 that purpose. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS