alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 12

                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS



COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     10/28/95-    4/1/95-
                                            3/31/98       3/31/97     3/31/96     10/27/95       3/31/95     3/31/94
                                            ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>             <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes          $ 9,665         $2,614      $  617       ($2,822)     ($1,615)     $2,133
ADD:
Portion of rents
representative of interest factor            1,736            440          54            73          143         105
Interest on indebtedness                    10,710          3,388       1,096         1,048        1,267       1,658
                                           -------         ------      ------       -------      -------      ------
                                           $22,111         $6,442      $1,767       ($1,701)       ($205)     $3,896
                                           =======         ======      ======       =======      =======      ======

FIXED CHARGES
Portion of rents
representative of interest factor            1,736            440          54            73          143         105
Interest on indebtedness                    10,710          3,388       1,096         1,048        1,267       1,658
                                           -------         ------      -----        -------      -------      ------
                                           $12,446         $3,828      $1,150       $ 1,121      $ 1,410      $1,763
                                           =======         ======      ======       =======      =======      ======

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges         $   1.8            1.7         1.5            --           --         2.2
                                           =======         ======      ======       =======      =======      ======


Deficiency of Earnings over
  fixed charges                                 --             --          --       ($2,822)     ($1,615)         --
                                                                                    =======      =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 12

Avis Group Holdings, Inc.  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  (Dollars in thousands)

|                                                             |  |   |         |  |   | Predecessor Companies
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | ------- |  | - | ---------------------
|
|
|
|Earnings available to cover fixed charges:                   |  |   |         |  |   |                      
|Income (loss) before income taxes                            |  | $ | 82,619  |  | $ | (69,850              
|Plus: Fixed charges                                          |  |   | 292,703 |  |   | 270,128              
|Less: Capitalization of interest                             |  |   | 8       |  |   | 22                   
|                                                             |  |   |         |  |   |                      
|Earnings available to cover fixed charges                    |  | $ | 375,314 |  | $ | 200,256              
|                                                             |  |   |         |  |   |                      
|Fixed charges:(a)                                            |  |   |         |  |   |                      
|Interest, including amortization of deferred financing costs |  | $ | 251,858 |  | $ | 234,901              
|Interest portion of rental payment                           |  |   | 40,845  |  |   | 35,227               
|                                                             |  |   |         |  |   |                      
|Total fixed charges                                          |  | $ | 292,703 |  | $ | 270,128              
|                                                             |  |   |         |  |   |                      
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           |  |   | 1.28x   |  |   | 0.74x                
|                                                             |  |   |         |  |   |                      

---

---

QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

GLENNA PHILLIPS §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:05-CV-362-Y

 §

JO ANNE B. BARNHART §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On June 1, 2006, the United States magistrate judge issued his

proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings”) in the

above-styled and -numbered cause. In his findings, the magistrate

judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration of the United States (“the Commissioner”)

denying plaintiff Glenna Phillips’s claim for disability insurance and

supplemental security income benefits be affirmed. The magistrate

judge’s order gave all parties until June 22 to serve and file with

the Court written objections to his proposed findings. 

Subsequently, the plaintiff filed her objections, asking this

Court to reject the findings of the magistrate judge. The defendant

did not file a response.

After carefully reviewing the findings, record, case law, and

Plaintiff’s objections, the Court concludes that the findings should

be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this

Court for the reasons stated therein.

Therefore, the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED July 10, 2006.

 

 Case 4:05-cv-00362-Y Document 24 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 109
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published the name of one entity that has been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this entity are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with this entity.

# DATES:

                        This action was issued on January 17, 2025. See                         **Supplementary Information**                         for relevant dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        OFAC: Associate Director for Global Targeting, 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance, 202-622-2490 or                         *https://ofac.treasury.gov/​contact-ofac.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website:                     *https://ofac.treasury.gov.*

## Notice of OFAC Action

On January 17, 2025, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following entity are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below. 

      ( print page 8429)    
Lisa M. Palluconi,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

[FR Doc. 2025-01876 Filed 1-28-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
Jason Murray BLACK v. STATE

CR-17-0110

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018 Reh. denied March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IDERIA WAYNE SMITH, 00607161, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:06-CV-0288-H

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, Correctional ) 

Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER OF THE COURT ON THE FOREGOING RECOMMENDATION

Considering the record in this case and the above recommendation, and pursuant to Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c), the Court hereby finds and orders:

IFP STATUS:

(X) the party appealing is GRANTED in forma pauperis status on appeal.

( ) the party appealing is proceeding in forma pauperis.

( ) the party appealing is DENIED in forma pauperis status on appeal

for the following reasons:

( ) the Court certifies, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3), that

the appeal is not taken in good faith. In support of this finding, the Court adopts and

incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation entered

in this case on . Based upon the Magistrate Judge’s findings,

this Court finds that the appeal presents no legal points of arguable merit and is

therefore frivolous. See Harkins v. Roberts, 935 F. Supp. 871, 873 (S. D. Miss. 1996)

(citing Howard v. King, 707 F. 2d 215, 219-20 (5 Cir. 1983)). th

( ) the person appealing is not a pauper;

( ) the person appealing has not complied with the requirements of Rule 24 of the Federal

Rules of Appellate Procedure and /or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) as ordered by the Court.

(See Notice of Deficiency and Order entered on ).

COA:

( ) a Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED on the following issues: 

 

(X) a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. The Court hereby adopts and incorporates by

reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation filed in this case on February

2, 2007, which were adopted by the District Court on February 15, 2007, in support of its finding

that Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that reasonable jurists could conclude

that the habeas corpus petition is not barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. §

2244(d); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 1602, 146 L. Ed .2d 542 (2000).

SIGNED this 11 day of June, 2007. th

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00288-H Document 22 Filed 06/11/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 74
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 921 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to further protect officers and 

employees of the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. COTTON, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. HAWLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to further protect 

officers and employees of the United States, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jaime Zapata and Vic5 tor Avila Federal Law Enforcement Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 It is the sense of Congress that— 

8 (1) since the founding of the Nation, officers 

9 and employees of the United States Government 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 921 IS

1 have dutifully and faithfully served the United 

2 States overseas, including in situations that place 

3 them at serious risk of death or bodily harm, in 

4 order to preserve, protect, and defend the interests 

5 of the United States; 

6 (2) securing the safety of such officers and em7 ployees while serving overseas is of paramount im8 portance and is also in furtherance of preserving, 

9 protecting, and defending the interests of the United 

10 States; 

11 (3) Federal courts, including the United States 

12 Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the United 

13 States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and 

14 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh 

15 Circuit, have correctly interpreted section 1114 of 

16 title 18, United States Code, to apply extraterritori17 ally to protect officers and employees of the United 

18 States while the officers and employees are serving 

19 abroad; 

20 (4) in a case involving a violent attack against 

21 Federal law enforcement officers Jaime Zapata and 

22 Victor Avila, a panel of a Federal court of appeals 

23 held that section 1114 of title 18, United States 

24 Code, does not apply extraterritorially, creating a 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 921 IS

1 split among the United States circuit courts of ap2 peals; and 

3 (5) in light of the opinion described in para4 graph (4), it has become necessary for Congress to 

5 clarify the original intent that section 1114 of title 

6 18, United States Code, applies extraterritorially. 

7 SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF 

8 THE UNITED STATES. 

9 Section 1114 of title 18, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 

11 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

12 ‘‘Whoever’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(b) EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.—There is 

15 extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by 

16 this section.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131795 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131795 

 COA: 269357 

Muskegon CC: 96-139261-FC

LADON DARNELL MOORE,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
# Memorandum To Resolve the Backlog of Security Clearances for Executive Office of the President Personnel

# Memorandum to the White House Counsel

The Executive Office of the President requires qualified and trusted personnel to execute its mandate on behalf of the American people. There is a backlog created by the Biden Administration in the processing of security clearances of individuals hired to work in the Executive Office of the President. Because of this backlog and the bureaucratic process and broken security clearance process, individuals who have not timely received the appropriate clearances are ineligible for access to the White House complex, infrastructure, and technology and are therefore unable to perform the duties for which they were hired. This is unacceptable.

Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order:

1. The White House Counsel to provide the White House Security Office and Acting Chief Security Officer with a list of personnel that are hereby immediately granted interim Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) security clearances for a period not to exceed six months; and

2. That these individuals shall be immediately granted access to the facilities and technology necessary to perform the duties of the office to which they have been hired; and

3. The White House Counsel, as my designee, may supplement this list as necessary; and

4. The White House Counsel, as my designee, shall have the authority to revoke the interim clearance of any individual as necessary.

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[FR Doc. 2025-02033

Billing code 3395-F4-P
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Robert K. Mills, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-S Security Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 26, 2006



/s/ Robert K. MillsRobert K. Mills, Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


1.     Neenah Foundry Company

       Hartley Controls Corporation - wholly owned.
       Neenah Transport, Inc. - wholly owned.
       Neenah Foreign Sales Corporation - wholly owned.
       Deeter Foundry, Inc. - wholly owned.
       Mercer Forge Corporation - wholly owned.
         A&M Specialties,Inc.
       Dalton Corporation - wholly owned.
          Dalton Corporation, Warsaw Manufacturing Facility
          Dalton Corporation, Ashland Manufacturing Facility
          Dalton Corporation, Kendallville Manufacturing Facility
          Dalton Corporation, Stryker Manufacturing Facility
       Advanced Cast Products, Inc. - wholly owned.
          Belcher Corporation.
          Peerless Corporation.
       Cast Alloys, Inc. - wholly owned.
          International Golf, S.A. de, C.V.
       Gregg Industries, Inc. - wholly owned.


                                       84
Thomas W. PICKERING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0359

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2019

Thomas W. Pickering, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*1196The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Rowe, Makar, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A. Cloutier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     |  |                        
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ PAUL A. CLOUTIER                                 |  | Dated: November 3, 2008
|Paul A. Cloutier                                     |  |                        
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



46
Phillip M. KESSLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-5234

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Hartford Retirement Network Corp. (the “Company”) for the
quarter ended December 31, 2017, each of Lianyue Song, the Chief Executive Officer, and Jimmy Zhou, the Chief Financial Officer,
of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|/ s / Lianyue Song                        | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|Lianyue Song, Principal Executive Officer | 

February 20, 2018



|/ s / Jimmy Zhou                        | 
|--------------------------------------- | 
|Jimmy Zhou, Principal Financial Officer | 

February 20, 2018