Exhibit 25

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-6 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 5
· · ·HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY

·1· · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

·2· · · · · ·NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

·3· · · · · · · · · SAN JOSE DIVISION

·4· ·---------------------------------------x

·5· ·FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

·6· · · · · · · · · ·Plaintiff

·7· ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · No. 17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC

·8· ·QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a

·9· ·Delaware Corporation,

10· · · · · · · · · · Defendant

11· ·---------------------------------------x

12· ·IN RE: QUALCOMM ANTITRUST

13· ·LITIGATION· · · · · · · ·No. 17-md-02773-LHK-NMC

14· ·---------------------------------------x

15· · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16· · · · · ·SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17· ·---------------------------------------x

18· ·IN RE: QUALCOMM

19· ·LITIGATION· · · · · · · ·No. 3:17-cv-00108-GPC-MDD

20· ·---------------------------------------x

21· · · HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

22· · VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF JOHN FINBARR MOYNIHAN

23· · · · · ·Monday, March 12, 2018 9:01 a.m.

24· · ·Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP

25· · · · · 60 State Street, Boston, MA 02109

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-6 Filed 11/28/18 Page 2 of 5
·1· ·understanding from?

·2· · · · A.· ·Again, I sort of cringe to see the

·3· ·legal stuff that I'm writing here, I'm not a

·4· ·lawyer, but I think I probably picked this stuff

·5· ·up over the course of many years from talking and

·6· ·discussing this topic, mostly likely with our

·7· ·in-house counsel.

·8· · · · Q.· ·Do you see in Point 3, you wrote, "I

·9· ·believe these rulings cause many of the IPR

10· ·holders to rework their licensing agreements and

11· ·policies and in my experience they now go out of

12· ·their way to make it absolutely clear that they

13· ·are not licensing to the chipset company."

14· · · · A.· ·Yes.· I see that.

15· · · · Q.· ·And then you discuss an experience that

16· ·you had negotiating with Nokia; is that right?

17· · · · A.· ·Yes.· I see that.

18· · · · 

23· · · · Q.· ·And do you know whether Qualcomm goes

24· ·out of its way to make it absolutely clear that

25· ·they are not licensing to the chipset company?

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-6 Filed 11/28/18 Page 3 of 5
·1· · · · · · ·MR. KEHL:· Objection.· Form.

·2· · · · A.· ·I don't.· I have never been involved in

·3· ·licensing discussions with Qualcomm.· I assume

·4· ·that's the case, but I've never seen it

·5· ·personally.

·6· · · · 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-6 Filed 11/28/18 Page 4 of 5
·1· · · · · · · · C E R T I F I C A T E

·2· ·COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

·3· ·SUFFOLK, SS.

·4· · · · I, Janet M. Sambataro, a Registered Merit

·5· ·Reporter and a Notary Public within and for the

·6· ·Commonwealth of Massachusetts do hereby certify:

·7· · · · THAT JOHN FINBARR MOYNIHAN, the witness whose

·8· ·testimony is hereinbefore set forth, was duly sworn

·9· ·by me and that such testimony is a true and accurate

10· ·record of my stenotype notes taken in the foregoing

11· ·matter, to the best of my knowledge, skill and

12· ·ability; that before completion of the deposition

13· ·review of the transcript was not requested.

14· · · · I further certify that I am not related to any

15· ·parties to this action by blood or marriage; and

16· ·that I am in no way interested in the outcome of

17· ·this matter.

18· · · · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand

19· ·this 13th day of March, 2018.

20

21· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·____________________

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·JANET M. SAMBATARO

22· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Notary Public

· · ·My Commission Expires:

23· ·July 16, 2021

24

25

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 937-6 Filed 11/28/18 Page 5 of 5