alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Morgan G. SALBER, Petitioner, v. Diana Marie FRYE, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-2917

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

C. David Durkee and Dale T. Gobel, of Gobel Flakes, LLC, Orlando, for Petitioner.

Jeffrey M. Byrd, of Jeffrey M. Byrd, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

*193In this certiorari proceeding, Petitioner, Morgan G. Salber, asks this Court to quash the trial court's discovery order compelling him to provide documents concerning the financial arrangements between his attorney, his insurance company, and his retained expert witness. Because there has been no departure from the essential requirements of law, we deny Petitioner's request.

We recently addressed this identical issue. *See**Younkin v. Blackwelder*, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D549, D549-50, --- So.3d ----, ----, 2019 WL 847548 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 22, 2019) ("In *Vazquez v. Martinez*, 175 So. 3d 372, 373-74 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015), we acknowledged that the discovery of the type of financial information requested in this case is permissible 'to assist counsel in impeaching examining physicians and other experts by demonstrating that the expert has economic ties to the insurance company or defense law firm.' "). As in *Younkin*, because Petitioner raised a compelling argument that the law in this area is not being applied in an even-handed manner to all litigants, we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance:

> WHETHER THE ANALYSIS AND DECISION IN *WORLEY v. CENTRAL FLORIDA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASS'N*, 228 SO. 3D 18 (FLA. 2017), SHOULD ALSO APPLY TO PRECLUDE A DEFENSE LAW FIRM OR INSURANCE COMPANY THAT IS NOT A PARTY TO THE LITIGATION FROM HAVING TO DISCLOSE ITS FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH EXPERTS THAT IT RETAINS OR COMPENSATES FOR PURPOSES OF LITIGATION INCLUDING THOSE THAT PERFORM COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS UNDER FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.360.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI DENIED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.

ORFINGER, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
James R. DOWNES v. STATE

CR-16-1071

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Contesa GISSENDANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-150

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence entered against Contesa Gissendanner for DUI Manslaughter and DUI Resulting in Injury to Person or Property in all respects except one. Because the award for costs of investigation was not supported by competent, substantial evidence, we reverse the imposition of $ 8752 in investigative costs and remand with instructions to hold a new hearing. *See* *Negron v. State*, 266 So.3d 1266, 2019 WL 1302366 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 22, 2019) (remanding for new hearing where award of investigative costs was not supported by competent, substantial evidence); *see also* *Williams v. State*, 850 So. 2d 627, 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (reversing for new restitution hearing where award was based solely on contested hearsay evidence (citing *Sherwood v. State*, 832 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) )).

*214AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.

ORFINGER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-32453, 333-37498,333-102249 and 333-105174 on Forms S-8 of our reports
dated March 11, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of ChoicePoint Inc. and management's report of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2004.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 FILED MARCH 10, 2000
WITH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         107,545
<SECURITIES>                                    35,283
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (82)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,267
<PP&E>                                          20,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,183)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,661
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           205
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,540
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,036
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,354
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,666
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44


</TABLE>
CORRECTED

EXHIBIT 32 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 592-1 Filed 04/29/20 Page 1 of 1
STIP. REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING

CR 17-00024 JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

United States Attorney

BARBARA J. VALLIERE (DCBN 439353)

Chief, Criminal Division

CHRISTINA McCALL (CABN 234139)

Assistant United States Attorney

1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 637-3680

FAX: (510) 637-3724

christina.mccall@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ALBERTO ACOSTA,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 17-00024 JST

 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

CONTINUE HEARING TO JANUARY 26, 2018

Date: November 17, 2017

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Court: Hon. Jon S. Tigar

The above-captioned matter is currently set on November 17, 2017 before this Court for a 

sentencing hearing. The parties now request that the Court continue the hearing to January 26, 2018. 

The continuance is requested because government counsel will be participating in a contested 

evidentiary hearing in United States v. Rodney Wilson, case 14-CR-00304-JD. On October 11, the 

Court in the Wilson case chose the morning of November 17 for the evidentiary hearing, because Mr. 

Wilson’s counsel recently began a lengthy trial, which is “dark” on Fridays. At the sentencing hearing 

in Mr. Acosta’s case, the parties will dispute which base offense level applies to Mr. Acosta’s crime, and 

whether Mr. Acosta possessed a “semiautomatic firearm that is capable of accepting a large capacity 

magazine.” The additional time should allow the parties to fully address this issue so that the Court will 

be prepared to determine the proper base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines.
STIP. REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING

CR 17-00024 JST

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mr. Acosta’s attorney, Angela Hansen, and the assigned United States Probation Officer, Karen 

Mar, are all available on January 26, 2018. 

DATED: October 19, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN J. STRETCH

United States Attorney

 /s/ Christina McCall 

CHRISTINA McCALL

Assistant U. S. Attorney

 /s/ Angela M. Hansen 

ANGELA M. HANSEN

Attorney for Alberto Acosta

ORDER

Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby ORDERS 

that the sentencing hearing is continued until January 26, 2018, at 9:30 a.m. 

IT SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 19, 2017

_______________________________

The Hon. Jon S. Tigar

United States District Court Judge
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 19-0903V 

UNPUBLISHED 

BRAD BUNDESEN, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: October 15, 2020 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA) 

   

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

Petitioner. 

Kyle Edward Pozza, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

 On June 20, 2019, Brad Bundesen filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to him on 

November 3, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters. 

On October 15, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes 

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, Respondent states that “petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012). 
2

Vaccine Injury Table (Table) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (QAI); 

petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation or dysfunction in his left shoulder; his pain 

and reduced range of motion occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular 

vaccination; his symptoms were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was 

administered; and no other condition or abnormality was identified to explain his initial 

symptoms.” Id. at 5. 

 In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Brian H. Corcoran 

 Brian H. Corcoran 

 Chief Special Master
Russell Warren LEWERS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1266

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Case 3:00-cv-02377-N Document 17 Filed 04/27/01 Page 1 of 1 PageID 56
EX PARTE Eugene Duyant KELLY

1170025 (CR-16-1060)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Brian E. Farley, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         /s/ BRIAN E. FARLEY   Brian E. Farley  *President, Chief  Executive Officerand Director*   Date:  March 31, 2005
EX PARTE Johnny HUGHLEY

CR-17-0255

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HAKIM ROBINSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 129 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Rami ACHDUT v. Jeff HUFF

1151328

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-12-00365-CV

WILLIAMS FARMS PRODUCE SALES, INC.

v.

R & G PRODUCE COMPANY

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 1 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2008-CCL-0673-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 27, 2014
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynamic Gold Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  November 7, 2005


/s/ Tim Coupland
---------------------------------------
Tim Coupland, Principal Financial Officer
| a.   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     DATE:      November 14,      2008                   /s/ ARTHUR P. BOLLON,      PH.D.                                                                    ARTHUR      P. BOLLON, PH.D.                                                                    CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER                                                                    (PRINCIPAL      EXECUTIVE OFFICER) |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registration Nos. 333-162888, 333-35245, 333-55838, 333-116528 and 333-137273) of Carrizo Oil
& Gas, Inc., a Texas corporation (the Company), relating to the Incentive Plan of the Company,
and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-159237, 333-142345 and
333-142346) of the Company (collectively, the Registration Statements) of the information
contained in our reserve report that is summarized as in our summary letter dated March 1, 2010,
relating to the oil and gas reserves and revenue, as of December 31, 2009, of certain interests
of the Company.
 We hereby consent to all references to such report, letter, and/or to this firm in each of the
Registration Statements and each Prospectus to which any such Registration Statement relates,
and further consent to our being named as an expert in each of the Registration Statements and
each Prospectus to which any such Registration Statement relates.
 LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd./s/ William M. KazmannName:
    William M. KazmannTitle:
    Senior Partner    
Order filed, January 14, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01035

- CR

____________ GLENN LLOYD KINGHAM , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1371576



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due January 06, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Becau se the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Marcia Barnett , the court reporter, to file volume 3 of the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report of
on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies that: Based on my knowledge,

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    DAVID E. TRINEDavid E. TrineChief Financial Officer


February 28, 2008