alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo GONZALEZ-FLOTA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50787

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 21, 2004.

*191Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Gonzalez-Flota appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Gonzalez-Flota contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Gonzalez-Flota maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.

In *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. *Id.*at 239-47. Gonzalez-Flota acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres,*but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review.

*Apprendi*did not overrule *AlmendarezTorres. See Apprendi,*530 U.S. at 489-90; *United States v. Dabeit,*231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000). This court must follow *Almendarez-Torres*“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” *Dabeit,*231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
VANQUISH ADVISORS LLC and Donald Uderitz, Appellants, v. KBC FINANCIAL PRODUCTS (CAYMAN ISLANDS) LTD, VCG Special Opportunities, Fund LP, and VCG SPecial Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd., Appellees.

No. 4D18-2318

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 23, 2019]

Gary A. Woodfield of Haile, Shaw & Pfaffenberger, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellants.

Thomas K. Cauley, Jr. and Joseph R. Dosch of Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois, and Joshua B. Feinberg of Malvin Feinberg, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee KBC Financial Products (Cayman Islands) LTD.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Damoorgian, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
|   |         |   |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY M FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | May 11, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |         |   | Name:  |   |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |         |   | Title: |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |         |   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |         |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |         |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | May 11, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |         |   | Name:  |   |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |         |   | Title: |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |         |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |         |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |         |   |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
The Huntington Mortgage Company                      (LOGO)
7575 Huntington Park Drive                            HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE
Columbus, Ohio 43235                                 COMPANY


                              Report of Management

We, as members  of  management  of The  Huntington  Mortgage  Company  (HMC),  a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of The Huntington  National Bank, are  responsible  for
complying with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP).  We are also  responsible for  establishing  and  maintaining  effective
internal  control over  compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards as set
forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1997 and for the year then ended.  Based on
this  evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended  December 31, 1997,  HMC
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period,  HMC had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount
of $40,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $8,000,000.


/s/R. Frederick Taylor
R. Frederick Taylor, President


/s/Irving A. Adler
Irving A. Adler, Senior Vice President



A subsidiary of The Huntington National Bank
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 21, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Fire Protection Association (“NFPA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Specifically, NFPA has provided an updated and current list of its standards development activities, related technical committee and conformity assessment activities. Information concerning NFPA regulations, technical committees, current standards, standards development, and conformity assessment activities are publicly available at                     *nfpa.org.*

                    On September 20, 2004, NFPA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61869). The last notification was filed with the Department on March 20, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on April 16, 2024 (89 FR 26925).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-01694 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of SFSB, Inc. (the Company) each certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Philip E. Logan                  
|Philip E. Logan                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 12, 2005                         



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ronald W. Robinson 
|Ronald W. Robinson     
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 12, 2005
Beverly SMITH v. CITADEL INSURANCE COMPANY as Successor to Gramercy Insurance Company and GoAuto Insurance Company

NO. 2019-CC-0052

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to *204Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
| 1) | such      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | the      information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bridge      Capital Holdings. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 12, 2010 | /s/ Thomas A. Sa                   |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                    | Thomas      A. Sa                  |
|                    | Executive      Vice President      |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|                    | (Principal      Financial Officer) |

----
Jeffrey R. BATTISHILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3717

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

VINCERA, INC.

FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I am the Chief Executive Officer of Vincera, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company).  I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-QSB).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, David R. Malmstedt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:

November 14, 2005

/s/ David R. Malmstedt

Name: David R. Malmstedt

Title:

Chief Executive Officer,

(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer)







1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6910
FELISBERTO R. DOCANTO, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MICHAEL A. R. SEALE; TREVOR DORSETT; PATRICK PILGRIM; JOSEPH BURNS; DAVID BOOTH, Plaintiffs, versus PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL; LEWIS BARLOW, John Doe #1, Superintendent; W. MARSHALL, John Doe #2,Captain; LIEUTENANT HUNTER, John Doe #3; LIEUTENANT SCOTT, John Doe #4; LIEUTENANT FORE, John Doe #5, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-417-AM) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 27, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Felisberto R. Docanto, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Felisberto R. Docanto seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice a pro se class action alleging violations of constitutional rights based upon conditions at the Piedmont Regional Jail. The district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice on the grounds that the six pro se plaintiffs were unable to fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. See Oxendine v. Williams, 509 F.2d 1405, 1407 (4th Cir. 1975). The court further determined that it would not be proper for the plaintiffs to proceed as co-plaintiffs because it appeared that some of them had exhausted their administrative remedies, while others had not.Because a dismissal without prejudice is not generally appealable, we dismiss the appeal. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).The appellant may refile an individual claim. We note that the applicable statute of limitations will continue to run. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

No. PD-0857-14

 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF TEXAS 

_____________________________________________________________ 

NO. 14-12-00642-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 

_____________________________________________________________ 

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

Appellant 

vs.

KENNETH LEE DOUDS 

Appellee 

STATE’S NOTIFICATION OF APPEARANCE AT ORAL 

ARGUMENT 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL 

APPEALS: 

 The State of Texas, the prosecuting authority in Cause No. 180270 in 

the County Court at Law No. One of Brazoria County, Texas, respectfully 

submits this State’s Notification of Appearance at Oral Argument and would 

respectfully inform the Court of the following: 

PD-0857-14

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 2/17/2015 2:45:44 PM

Accepted 2/17/2015 2:52:02 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2

David Bosserman will be representing the State at oral argument on 

Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 9:00 A.M. in the above styled and numbered 

cause, before the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________

David Bosserman

Assistant District Attorney

111 E. Locust, Suite 408A

Angleton, Texas 77515

(979) 864-1232

Fax. No. (979) 864-1525

Bar Card No. 02679520

davidb@brazoria-county.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copy of this State’s Notification of 

Appearance at Oral Argument was served by E-service on Charles D. 

Adams, attorney for Appellee, in compliance with Rule 9.5 of the Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. A copy was also served by E-service on the State 

Prosecuting Attorney in compliance with Rule 68.11 of the Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. E-service was completed on this the 17

th day of 

February, 2015.

Charles D. Adams Lisa C. McMinn

Attorney for Appellee-Defendant State Prosecuting Attorney

7930 Broadway, Suite 106 P.O. Box 13046

Pearland, Texas 77581 Austin, Texas 78711

Bar No. 24026760 Bar No. 13803300

Email: cda@cdadamslaw.com Email: Lisa.McMinn@spa.texas.gov

______________________________

David Bosserman
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 20 (Friday, January 31, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02029]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE639]

Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Pacific Council) 
Highly Migratory Species Management Team (HMSMT) will hold a webinar, 
which is open to the public.

DATES: The online meeting will be held Tuesday, February 18, 2025, from 
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Pacific Standard Time or until business for the 
day is completed.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held online. Specific meeting 
information, including directions on how to join the meeting and system 
requirements, will be provided in the meeting announcement on the 
Pacific Council's website (see www.pcouncil.org). You may send an email 
to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt ([email protected]) or contact him at 
(503) 820-2412 for technical assistance.
    Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE 
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerry Griffin, Staff Officer, Pacific 
Council; telephone: (503) 820-2409.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this HMSMT webinar is to 
discuss relevant topics on the Pacific Council's March 2025 meeting 
agenda and potentially prepare supplemental reports for these items.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may be discussed, those issues may not be the subject of formal action 
during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those issues 
specifically listed in this document and any issues arising after 
publication of this document that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the intent to 
take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt 
([email protected]; (503) 820-2412) at least 10 days prior to 
the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 28, 2025.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-02029 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
Using R to Automate the 

Development of Custom 

Reports in Word Format

September 23, 2019

Alexandra Gates, Principal Data Analyst

NORC at the University of Chicago
2

Overview

 Background

 Preprocessing: Data  Interim Files

 Visualization: Interim Files  Exhibits

 Customization: Interim Files  Customization

 Work with Word: Template + Exhibits + Customization = Reports!

 Lessons Learned
3

Background

 What are we doing?

 Primary data collection from multiple data sources for ~500 facilities

 Reporting data collected per facility vs. benchmark by facility size

 Why are we customizing reports?

 Data reported & data included varies across facilities

 Want to ensure continued facility participation

 Why create easy to understand graphics?

 Want facilities to engage with the data and use it to inform performance

 Want to reduce back and forth between us and the facilities to explain data included in the report
4

Overall Process

Exhibits

Facility List

Table A

Data for 

Tool B

Table B Benchmark B

Data Issue 

Graph C Flags

Facility Ranking Table C

Facility 

Information

Facility 

Master File

Report 

Customization

Report Template 

(Word Template)

.DOCX Reports

Data for 

Tool A

Data for 

Tool C

Benchmark A

Benchmark C
5

Preprocessing Data

 Analysis is only as good as the data

 Why did we need to do extensive preprocessing?

 Humans vs. Machines

 Creation of flags & reporting exclusion reasons

 What libraries did we use?

 Tidyverse: dplyr, reshape2

 Gather()

 Spread()
6

Visualization

 What packages did we use?

 ggplot2; ggrepel; gridExtra; ggthemes

 Types of graphs?

 Line and bar charts

 Ease of consumption

 Continuity in themes & colors

 Colors chosen with facilities in mind
7

Production

 Starting with Facility Master File

 Main script calls RMD in a loop

 Main script passes parameters to RMD in each loop

 Parameters: data in Master Facility File  global variables in RMD
8

Customizations

 Print paragraph (or not)

 Print variables (or not)

 Print table (or not)
9

Work with WORD (Formatting)

Things you can do:

 Logo as header

 Page numbers in footer

 Font, size, formats for different levels of titles, bolding, italic, document margins

 Paragraph spacing

Things that were a little more difficult:

 Table formatting

 Insert blank lines
10

Lessons Learned

 Missing versus non-existent data: ggplot knows the difference

 Special characters and extra spaces in names can disrupt report production

 Plan ahead and organize code to have a longer shelf life

 QC is important

 R + word is extremely flexible, after a bit of wrangling

 File sizes can get unruly
11

Acknowledgement + Contact Information + Thank you!

 Mina Zheng for being my coding partner in crime on this endeavor

 Yue, Tyler, and full NORC team for giving us clean data, providing feedback on templates and 

graphics, and helping with QC.

 Email: Gates-Alexandra@norc.org

 Thank you!