alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-205-2024]

On November 20, 2024, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Sioux Falls Development Foundation, Inc., grantee of FTZ 220, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 220, on behalf of Wurth Electronics Midcom, Inc., in Watertown, South Dakota.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (89 FR 92892-92893, November 25, 2024). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval.                

Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 220A was approved on January 28, 2025, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 220's 2,000-acre activation limit.

Dated: January 28, 2025.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2025-02052 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00256

- CR
Oscar Osvaldo Barajas Jr. a/k/a Oscar Osvaldo Barajas v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. A

- 22

- 5023

- CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH C OURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 13, 2 023
Donna Marie MYRICK v. STATE

CR-16-1251

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of ING Groep N.V., a public limited company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 17, 2014



/s/ R. HamersName:

Ralph HamersTitle:

Chairman of the Executive Board(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ING Groep N.V. and will be retained by ING Groep N.V. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request.
Thomas Emory SANSPREE v. STATE

CR-16-1171

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied February 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO.,LIMITED, Successor-in-interest to ST. PAULREINSURANCE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.,THE FORT MILLER CO. andBEECHE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

)))))))))))))))

No. C05-1912 BZ

ORDER RE OVERDUE OPPOSITION PAPERS

Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss scheduled to be

heard on August 13, 2008.  Your opposition was due yesterday 

July 23, 2008.  If your opposition is not filed by 4:00 p.m.

today, July 24, 2008 the court will deem the motion unopposed

and will GRANT the motion on that ground alone.  See Local

Rule 7-3.

Dated:  July 24, 2008

   Bernard Zimmerman 

  United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\UNIONAMERICA V. FORT MILLER\ORDER RE OVERDUE OPPOSITIONPAPERS.wpd

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ   Document 118   Filed 07/24/08   Page 1 of 1
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 958 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to expand the 

allowable use criteria for new access points grants for 

community health centers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 958 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maximizing Outcomes 

3 through Better Investments in Lifesaving Equipment for 

4 (MOBILE) Health Care Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. NEW ACCESS POINTS GRANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 330(e)(6)(A) of the Pub7 lic Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(e)(6)(A)) is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(v) MOBILE UNITS.—An existing 

10 health center may be awarded funds under 

11 clause (i) to establish a new delivery site 

12 that is a mobile unit, regardless of whether 

13 the applicant additionally proposes to es14 tablish a permanent, full-time site. In the 

15 case of a health center that is not cur16 rently receiving funds under this section, 

17 such health center may be awarded funds 

18 under clause (i) to establish a new delivery 

19 site that is a mobile unit only if such 

20 health center uses a portion of such funds 

21 to also establish a permanent, full-time 

22 site.’’. 
3 

†S 958 ES

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2024. 

Passed the Senate September 6, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 958 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to expand 

grants for community health centers. the allowable use criteria for new access points
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0029 STATE OF MONANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSE LUIS PERALTA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including May 24 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 19 2022

04/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0029
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bois dArc Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roland O. Burns, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ ROLAND O. BURNS 
 Roland O. Burns
Chief Financial Officer
June 20, 2005
Terence JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0428

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-32453, 333-37498, 333-102249, 333-105174 and 333-133706 on Forms S-8 of our reports dated February 27, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of ChoicePoint Inc.(which report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the January 1, 2006 adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R“Share Based Payment” and the December 31, 2006 adoption of SFAS No. 158 “Employer Accounting for Defined Pension and Other Post Retirement Benefit Plans”) and our report dated February 27, 2007 relating to management’sreport on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

February 27, 2007
STATE of Louisiana v. Travis Davis MARCEL

NO. 2018-KH-1509

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied. Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Marcell v. State, 13-1239 (La. 5/27/16), 193 So.3d 138.

WEIMER, J., recused.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Southridge Enterprises, Inc. on Form
      10-QSB/A for the period ending November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Smith, CFO
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





By:
            /S/
                Stephen SmithStephen
                SmithChief
                Financial Officer and Director(Secretary,
                Treasurer and Principal Financial
                Officer)





August
      11, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130947 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130947 COA: 258399 Ingham CC: 00-075986-FC CRAIG JAMES MARR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 10.17
**PEGASUS SOLUTIONS, INC.**
**2005 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY**
     During 2005, Pegasus Solutions, Inc.’s (“Pegasus”) standard arrangements for Directorcompensation include a payment of $15,000, payable in quarterly installments, for a non-employeeChairman of the Board. All other non-employee Directors will receive $10,000, payable quarterly.Additionally, during 2005, each non-employee Director will receive $2,500 for each Board ofDirectors meeting attended in person and $1,250 for each Board of Directors meeting attendedtelephonically. Each non-employee Director will also receive $1,000 for each committee meetingattended in person and $500 for each committee meeting attended telephonically. Each CommitteeChairman will receive an additional $500 for each committee meeting attended in person and anadditional $250 for each committee meeting attended telephonically. Personal attendance ortelephonic attendance at informal Board of Directors and committee gatherings will be compensatedin the same manner as personal or telephonic attendance at formal Board of Directors and committeemeetings, as the case may be. Directors will also be eligible for reimbursement of all reasonableexpenses incurred while performing their duties as Directors of Pegasus.
     Non-employee Directors will also receive stock option grants as follows:
 •  Options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock of Pegasus at the closingprice on the date immediately preceding election as a Director. These optionswill vest over a three year period, with 1/12 of the option shares vesting eachquarter during the Director’s term of office, and will have a ten-year term;  •  An additional grant of 8,000 option shares at the closing price of the stockon the day preceding each subsequent anniversary date of election to office.These options will vest 25% each quarter during the Director’s term of office,vesting in full in one year, and will have a ten-year term; and  •  Such additional grants as may be awarded at the discretion of theCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Pegasus (“CompensationCommittee”).
     During 2005, non-employee members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Pegasuswill receive annual retainer fees of $5,000 per member and $10,000 for the Chairman.
     All compensation stated above is subject to amendment at the discretion of the CompensationCommittee.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-63743, 333-72551, 333-37564 and 333-64736, each on Form S-3 of Pan Pacific
Retail Properties, Inc. and to incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 333-61169 and 333-51384 each on Form S-8 of Pan Pacific Retail
Properties, Inc., of our report dated January 23, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the related Schedule III,
which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of Pan
Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.


                                       /s/ KPMG LLP

San Diego, California
March 21, 2002
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_science(4)
              - products_data(2)
              - products_maps(11)
              - products_publications(45)
              - (-)multimedia_audio(2)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(1)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(1)
              - multimedia_image(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(2)
              - multimedia_video(49)
              - multimedia_video-149194(43)
              - multimedia_video-149195(3)
              - multimedia_video-149197(3)
              - connect_staff_profiles(1)

## By Location

              - alaska(3)
              - arizona(1)
              - (-)california(2)
              - colorado(1)
              - florida(1)
              - louisiana(2)
              - michigan(1)
              - minnesota(1)
              - oregon(2)
              - south carolina(3)
              - south dakota(24)
              - virginia(2)

## By Year

Interviews        June 1, 2022        Landers Rupture — Jonathan Fieldwork

Podcasts        October 13, 2021        Eyes on Earth Episode 60 – Landsat 9 Launch Part 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

I N RE:

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS APPROVED

AS DEPOSITORIES FOR FIDUCIARY

ACCOUNTS :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO

. 156

DISCIPLINARY RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30 th day of January

, 201 8

, it is hereby Ordered that the financial

inst itutions named on the attached l ist are approved as depositories for fiduciary accounts

in accordance with Pa.R.D.E. 221.
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Financial Condition

June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

(unaudited)

June 30

2011

December 31

2010

Assets

 Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 12,619,173 $ 149,831,122

 Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 3,232,431,325 2,974,340,739

 Accrued Interest Receivable 21,607,256 21,543,852

 Premiums Receivable 49,422,000 79,969,000

Total Assets $ 3,316,079,754 $ 3,225,684,713

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 222,265 $ 339,113

 Farm Credit Insurance Fund

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 3,315,857,489 3,225,345,600

 Total Insurance Fund 3,315,857,489 3,225,345,600

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 3,316,079,754 $ 3,225,684,713
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Revenue and Expense

For the Period Ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

Calendar Year To Date

June 30, 2011

Calendar Year To Date

June 30, 2010

Income

 Premiums $ 49,402,000 $ 42,290,545

 Interest Income on Investments 42,694,646 34,093,338

 Gain/(Loss) on Disposition of Investments 0 14,548

Total Income $ 92,096,646 $ 76,398,431

Expenses

 Administrative Operating Expenses $ 1,584,757 $ 1,531,352

Total Expenses $ 1,584,757 $ 1,531,352

Net Income $ 90,511,889 $ 74,867,079

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund 

For Period Ended June 30, 2011

(unaudited)

Balance at January 1, 2011 $ 3,225,345,600

Net Income 90,511,889

Balance at March 31, 2011 $ 3,315,857,489
Kelvin DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3044

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 28, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, BERGER and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Woodburck NOE v. STATE

CR-17-0092

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 16, 2018 Reh. denied February 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Dominic ABOSI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2269

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Dominic Abosi, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMMANUEL S. ROBINSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,



### v. Civil ActionNo. FREDERICKJ. BRYNN, P.e., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED JUN - 42010 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia



# 10 

# 0918

This matter is before the Court upon consideration ofplaintiffs application to proceed in formapauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. Plaintiffbrings this civil action against Frederick J. Brynn, the attorneyhe hired to represent him in a tort action arising from an automobile accident onFebruary 7, 2008. Compl.

at 1-2. He alleges that defendant committed legal malpractice and fraud, breached their contract, and otherwise was grossly negligent in the performance ofhis dues as retained counsel. See id. at 1-, 5-6 (Counts One, Two, Four and Five). Plaintiffdemands a declaratoryjudgment and compensatory and punitive damages. Id. at 6. Federal district courts havejurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws ortreaties ofthe United States. See 28 U.S.C. 

### § 1331. In addition, federal district courts havejurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens ofdifferent states. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Notwithstandingplaintiffsreliance on42 U.S.C. § 1983, nothing in the complaint suggests that defendant acted under color ofDistrict ofColumbia law. This alone is fatal toplaintiffs civil rights claim. See Edwards v. Olde Dokie, Inc., 473 F. Supp. 2d 31, 41 (D.D.C. 2007) (dismissing 

### § 1983 claim against a nightclub absent an allegation in the complaint or any evidence produced in opposition to summaryjudgmentmotion that nightclub was acting under color ofDistrict ofColumbia law). Moreover, although plaintiffdemands damages in excess of the $75,000 threshhold, he does not establish that the parties reside or conductbusiness in different states. Plaintiff, therefore, fails to establishjurisdictionbased on diversity of citizenship. The Court will dismiss the complaint withoutprejudice for lack ofsubject matter jurisdiction. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

# [;J~ 

# J**JjVKJ~** United States District Judge DATE: