##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 2



---



|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commission File No. 0-51172



---

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 33-0795984                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 250

Las Vegas, Nevada

(Address of
principal executive offices)

89134

(Zip Code)

702-839-7200

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.    Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



|                         |  |                    |  |                            
|------------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Large accelerated filer ̈ |  | Accelerated filer ̈ |  | Non-accelerated filer     x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).    Yes ̈No  x

As of May 15, 2006, there were 124,038,714 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding.



---



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

FORM 10-Q/A

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006



---

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-Q/A amends and restates in its entirety the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
first quarter ended March 31, 2006, as initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 15, 2006 and amended on May 17, 2006, and is being filed to reflect the restatement of the Companys:

Balance Sheet

Statement of Operations

Statement of Stockholders Equity (deficit)

Statement of Cash Flows

As discussed in more detail in Note 2 of the notes to the financial statements,
this restatement is to correct an error in identifying certain financial instruments as derivatives in the application of certain accounting principles related to the issuance of the Companys convertible note financing and the impact of such
accounting principles on previously issued and vested non-employee stock option and warrant transactions in prior periods. The previously recorded transactions were properly treated as equity transactions at the time of their respective issuances.
Upon the sale of the Companys convertible notes on March 20, 2006, more recent accounting practices, as more fully set forth below, require the previously issued and vested non-employee options and warrants to be reclassified as derivative
liabilities. The reclassification of previously issued and vested options and warrants as derivative instruments requires the Companys financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2006 to be restated.

The convertible note agreements entered into on March 20, 2006 and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on March 22, 2006 contain variable share settlement
provisions. These provisions require the Company to reclassify, at fair value, previously issued and vested options and warrants to non-employees from additional paid in capital to derivative liability accounts on the balance sheet in
accordance with EITF 00-19 Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in a Companys Own Stock (EITF 00-19). The reason for this reclassification is the possibility that the
Company may not have enough authorized unissued common stock to meet all of its commitments in the delivery of the Companys common stock to honor both the contracts related to the convertible notes and the previously issued and vested option
and warrant contracts. In order to be in the situation of not having enough unissued shares to deliver to the option and warrant holders, the fair market value of the common stock of the Company would have to be lower than all of the exercise prices
of all the option and warrant contracts. In such case, an option or warrant holder would have to exercise his or her options or warrants at a price that would require him or her to pay more than the fair market value of the common stock on the open
market. Nonetheless, according to EITF 00-19 the previously recorded transactions must be reclassified from equity to liability. In addition, further analysis indicates the previously issued and vested options and warrants identified as derivative
instruments require separate valuation under FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

The notes
to the financial statements, particularly Note 2Restatement, Note 10Convertible Notes Payable, Note 11Stockholders Equity, and Note 12Reclassification of Equity Transactions have been added or restated to more
completely describe the derivative instruments, the methodology used to establish the fair values of each and the reclassifications required.

In addition, the Company has also restated Note 7Prepaid and Other Current Assets, to describe in greater detail what the amounts listed in the table include, and Note 15Commitments and Contingencies which has been reformatted
into a tabular form for improved clarity and detail regarding the contracts previously described. The Company has also made some immaterial modifications and corrections in language to be consistent with its current filings.

In addition to the changes described above, Item 6 of Part II of the original filing has been amended to contain currently dated certifications from the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These certifications are attached to this Form 10-Q/A as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, respectively.

This Amendment continues to speak as of the date of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except as set forth above, this
Amendment No. 2 to our Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 does not reflect events occurring after May 15, 2006 or modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events. The filing of this Amendment No. 2 is not a
representation that any statements contained in the original Quarterly Report, or this Amendment No. 2 are true and complete as of any date subsequent to the date of the original Quarterly Report. The filing of this Amendment No. 2 shall not be
deemed an admission that the original filing, when made, contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein not misleading.



---

INDEX



|         |  |                                                                                                                                                              |  |     
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                              |  | Page
|PART I.  |  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                                                                                                        |  | 3   
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 1.  |  | Financial Statements                                                                                                                                         |  | 3   
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|         |  | Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 (Unaudited)                                                                                        |  | 3   
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|         |  | Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and for the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 |  | 4   
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|         |  | Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited) for the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006                                    |  | 5   
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|         |  | Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and for the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 |  | 7   
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|         |  | Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements                                                                                                                      |  | 9   
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 2.  |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                                                                        |  | 35  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 3.  |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                                                                                   |  | 56  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 4.  |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                                                                      |  | 56  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|PART II. |  | OTHER INFORMATION                                                                                                                                            |  | 57  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 1.  |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                                                                            |  | 57  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 1A. |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                                                                 |  | 57  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 2.  |  | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds                                                                                                  |  | 68  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 3.  |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                                                                                              |  | 69  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 4.  |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                                                                          |  | 69  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 5.  |  | Other Information                                                                                                                                            |  | 69  
|         |  |                                                                                                                                                             
|Item 6.  |  | Exhibits                                                                                                                                                     |  | 69  



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND MARCH 31, 2006 (UNAUDITED)



|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------- | ----------- | - | --------------------- | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  | December 31,2005 |             |   | March 31,2006Restated |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   | (unaudited)           |  
|ASSETS                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Current Assets:                                                                                                                                                                |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                                                      |  | $                | 8,674,590   |   |                       | $ | 23,041,807  |  
|Restricted cash                                                                                                                                                                |  |                  | 137,363     |   |                       |   | 138,251     |  
|Due from an affiliate                                                                                                                                                          |  |                  | 1,407       |   |                       |   | 103,975     |  
|Prepaid assets                                                                                                                                                                 |  |                  | 449,281     |   |                       |   | 756,439     |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                                                                           |  |                  | 9,262,641   |   |                       |   | 24,040,472  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                 
|Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation ($14,210 and $18,238, as of December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006
respectively)                                         |  |                  | 199,123     |   |                       |   | 599,883     |  
|Deferred financing cost, net of amortization ($0 and $14,380, as of December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006
respectively)                                                         |  |                  |            |   |                       |   | 1,538,620   |  
|Other assets                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  | 26,750      |   |                       |   | 26,750      |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Total assets                                                                                                                                                                   |  | $                | 9,488,514   |   |                       | $ | 26,205,725  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)                                                                                                                                 |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Current Liabilities:                                                                                                                                                           |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Accrued interest payable                                                                                                                                                       |  | $                | 434         |   |                       | $ | 91,091      |  
|Due to an affiliate                                                                                                                                                            |  |                  |            |   |                       |   | 148,032     |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  | 173,763     |   |                       |   | 500,521     |  
|Accrued payroll and payroll taxes                                                                                                                                              |  |                  | 125,430     |   |                       |   | 78,896      |  
|Deferred rent                                                                                                                                                                  |  |                  |            |   |                       |   | 64,296      |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                                                                      |  |                  | 299,627     |   |                       |   | 882,836     |  
|Derivative Liabilities                                                                                                                                                         |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Convertible notes payable, embedded derivatives, and warrant derivative                                                                                                        |  |                  |            |   |                       |   | 21,623,592  |  
|Warrant derivativesother                                                                                                                                                      |  |                  |            |   |                       |   | 1,505,000   |  
|Option derivativesother                                                                                                                                                       |  |                  |            |   |                       |   | 11,885,725  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  | 299,627     |   |                       |   | 35,897,153  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Commitments and contingencies                                                                                                                                                  |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                 
|Stockholders Equity (Deficit)                                                                                                                                                 |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 52,850 shares issued; no shares outstanding at December 31, 2005
and March 31, 2006, respectively |  |                  |            |   |                       |   |            |  
|Common stock, $0.001 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized; 123,899,598 and 123,988,714 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005
and March 31, 2006, respectively |  |                  | 123,899     |   |                       |   | 123,988     |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                                                     |  |                  | 38,222,166  |   |                       |   | 26,289,199  |  
|Deficit accumulated during the development stage                                                                                                                               |  |                  | (29,157,178 | ) |                       |   | (36,104,613 | )
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Total stockholders equity (deficit)                                                                                                                                           |  |                  | 9,188,887   |   |                       |   | (9,691,428  | )
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit)                                                                                                                           |  | $                | 9,488,514   |   |                       | $ | 26,205,725  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                       |   |             |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 AND 2006 AND FOR

THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 11, 1998
(INCEPTION) TO MARCH 31, 2006



|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | ----------- | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                      |  | For the Three Month Periods Ended March 31, |             |   | For the
Periodfrom March 11,1998 (inception)to March 31,2006 Restated |  
|                                                                                      |  | 2005                                        |             |   | 2006 Restated                                                         |   |            
|Operating expenses:                                                                   |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Research and development (A)                                                          |  | $                                           | 412,717     |   |                                                                       | $ | 1,469,698   |   |  | $ | 10,947,211  |  
|Selling, general and administrative (B)                                               |  |                                             | 1,347,542   |   |                                                                       |   | 2,658,643   |   |  |   | 17,188,430  |  
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Total operating expenses                                                              |  |                                             | 1,760,259   |   |                                                                       |   | 4,128,341   |   |  |   | 28,135,641  |  
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Operating loss                                                                        |  |                                             | (1,760,259  | ) |                                                                       |   | (4,128,341  | ) |  |   | (28,135,641 | )
|Other income (expenses)                                                               |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Interest income                                                                       |  |                                             | 47,412      |   |                                                                       |   | 92,119      |   |  |   | 452,093     |  
|Interest expense                                                                      |  |                                             | (1,552,319  | ) |                                                                       |   | (203,904    | ) |  |   | (5,693,502  | )
|Other income (expenses)                                                               |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                       |   |            |   |  |   | (5,254      | )
|Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives                                              |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                       |   | (1,525,639  | ) |  |   | (1,525,639  | )
|Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives-Warrant and Option Derivatives               |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   | (1,181,670  | ) |  |   | (1,181,670  | )
|Equity in loss of unconsolidated investee                                             |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                       |   |            |   |  |   | (15,000     | )
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net other expenses                                                                    |  |                                             | (1,504,907  | ) |                                                                       |   | (2,819,094  | ) |  |   | (7,968,972  | )
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss before Provision for Income Taxes                                            |  |                                             | (3,265,166  | ) |                                                                       |   | (6,947,435  | ) |  |   | (36,104,613 | )
|Provision for income taxes                                                            |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                       |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Net loss                                                                              |  | $                                           | (3,265,166  | ) |                                                                       | $ | (6,947,435  | ) |  | $ | (36,104,613 | )
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Loss per share                                                                        |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Basic (loss) per share                                                                |  | $                                           | (0.03       | ) |                                                                       | $ | (0.06       | ) |  |   |             |  
|Diluted (loss) per share                                                              |  | $                                           | (0.03       | ) |                                                                       | $ | (0.06       | ) |  |   |             |  
|Shares used to calculate loss per share                                               |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Basic                                                                                 |  |                                             | 114,290,178 |   |                                                                       |   | 120,380,475 |   |  |   |             |  
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Diluted                                                                               |  |                                             | 114,290,178 |   |                                                                       |   | 120,380,475 |   |  |   |             |  
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |            
|(A) Research and development with related parties (Notes 4 and 13)                    |  | $                                           | 127,785     |   |                                                                       | $ | 466,205     |   |  | $ | 3,590,165   |  
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |            
|(B) Selling general and administrative expenses with related parties (Notes 4 and 13) |  | $                                           | 131,864     |   |                                                                       | $ | 1,397,262   |   |  | $ | 6,795,364   |  
|                                                                                      |  |                                             |             |   |                                                                       |   |             |   |  |   |             |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(UNAUDITED)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 11, 1998 (INCEPTION) TO MARCH 31, 2006



|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | ------ | --------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------ | - | --------------- | - |  | -------------------------- |  | - | ------------------- |  | - | ----- | - |  | - | --------- | - |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                       |  | Date       |        | Price Per Equity Unit |        | Preferred Stock Series A, Convertible |        |   | Common Stock |   | Committed Stock |   |  | Additional Paid-In Capital |  |   | Accumulated Deficit |  |   | Totał |  
|                                                                       |  |            | Shares |                       |        | Amount                                |        |   | Shares       |   | Amount          |   |  |                            | 
|Balance, March 11, 1998 (date of inception)                            |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |       |   |              | $ |                |   |  |                           |  | $ |                    |  | $ |      |   |  | $ |          |   |  | $ |           |   |  | $ |           |  
|Issuance of common stock to founders                                   |  | (1)        |        | $                     | 0.001  |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 93,050,000                 |  |   | 93,050              |  |   | 67    |   |  |   | (92,186   | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   | 931        |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 7/9/1998   |        |                       | 0.10   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 300,000                    |  |   | 300                 |  |   |       |   |  |   | 29,700    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 30,000     |  
|Issuance of preferred stock for cash                                   |  | (1)        |        |                       | 9.85   |                                       | 52,850 |   |              |   | 53              |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   | 520,347   |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 520,400    |  
|Net loss (unaudited)                                                   |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (567,864   | ) |  |   | (567,864   | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 1998                                             |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       | 52,850 |   |              |   | 53              |   |  | 93,350,000                 |  |   | 93,350              |  |   | 67    |   |  |   | 457,861   |   |  |   | (567,864   | ) |  |   | (16,533    | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of common stock to founders                                   |  | (2)        |        | $                     | 0.001  |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 4,580,000                  |  |   | 4,580               |  |   | (46   | ) |  |   | (4,488    | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   | 46         |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 6/25/1999  |        |                       | 0.30   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 66,800                     |  |   | 67                  |  |   |       |   |  |   | 19,933    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 20,000     |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 6/25/1999  |        |                       | 0.30   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 100,000                    |  |   | 100                 |  |   |       |   |  |   | 29,900    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 30,000     |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 10/5/1999  |        |                       | 0.30   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 340,000                    |  |   | 340                 |  |   |       |   |  |   | 101,660   |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 102,000    |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                                 |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   | 82,293    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 82,293     |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (654,875   | ) |  |   | (654,875   | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 1999                                             |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       | 52,850 |   |              |   | 53              |   |  | 98,436,800                 |  |   | 98,437              |  |   | 21    |   |  |   | 687,159   |   |  |   | (1,222,739 | ) |  |   | (437,069   | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of common stock to founders                                   |  | (3)        |        | $                     | 0.001  |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 2,120,000                  |  |   | 2,120               |  |   | (21   | ) |  |   | (2,078    | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   | 21         |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 12/21/2000 |        |                       | 0.4117 |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 8,750,000                  |  |   | 8,750               |  |   |       |   |  |   | 3,593,250 |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 3,602,000  |  
|Issuance of common stock for conversion of convertible preferred stock |  | (4)        |        |                       | 0.10   |                                       | (1,500 | ) |              |   | (2              | ) |  | 150,000                    |  |   | 150                 |  |   |       |   |  |   | (148      | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   |           |  
|Issuance of common stock for services                                  |  | (5)        |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 583,300                    |  |   | 583                 |  |   |       |   |  |   | (583      | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   |           |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                                 |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   | 73,660    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 73,660     |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (2,232,877 | ) |  |   | (2,232,877 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2000                                             |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       | 51,350 |   |              |   | 51              |   |  | 110,040,100                |  |   | 110,040             |  |   |      |   |  |   | 4,351,260 |   |  |   | (3,455,616 | ) |  |   | 1,005,735  |  
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 8/10/2001  |        |                       | 0.80   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  | 150,000                    |  |   | 150                 |  |   |      |   |  |   | 119,850   |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 120,000    |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (1,664,954 | ) |  |   | (1,664,954 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2001                                             |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       | 51,350 |   |              |   | 51              |   |  | 110,190,100                |  |   | 110,190             |  |   |      |   |  |   | 4,471,110 |   |  |   | (5,120,570 | ) |  |   | (539,219   | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (1,328,460 | ) |  |   | (1,328,460 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2002                                             |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       | 51,350 |   |              |   | 51              |   |  | 110,190,100                |  |   | 110,190             |  |   |      |   |  |   | 4,471,110 |   |  |   | (6,449,030 | ) |  |   | (1,867,679 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                                 |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   | 47,120    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 47,120     |  
|Issuance of warrants for services                                      |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   | 119,744   |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 119,744    |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (2,328,748 | ) |  |   | (2,328,748 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2003                                             |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       | 51,350 |   |              |   | 51              |   |  | 110,190,100                |  |   | 110,190             |  |   |      |   |  |   | 4,637,974 |   |  |   | (8,777,778 | ) |  |   | (4,029,563 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |        |                       |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                 |   |  |                            |  |   |                     |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  



5



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage
Company)

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 11, 1998 (INCEPTION) TO MARCH 31, 2006



|                                                             |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ------ | --------- |  | ------------------------------------ | - |  | ------------ | --- | -------------- |  | ----------- | -------------------------- | - | ------- | ------------------- | - | ------ | ----- |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                             |  | Date |        | Price Per |  | Preferred StockSeries A, Convertible |   |  | Common Stock |     | CommittedStock |  |             | Additional Paid-In Capital |   |         | Accumulated Deficit |   |        | Total | 
|                                                             |  |      | Shares |           |  | Amount                               |   |  | Shares       |     | Amount         |  |             |                            |  
|Issuance of common stock for conversion of convertible notes |  | (6)  |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  | 1,649,550   |                            |   | 1,650   |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 4,529,550   |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 4,531,200   |  
|Conversion of convertible preferred stock                    |  | (7)  |        |           |  | (28,100                              | ) |  |              | (28 | )              |  | 810,000     |                            |   | 810     |                     |   | 2,000  |       |  |   | (2,782      | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   |            |  
|Interest on benefit conversion feature                       |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 2,050,000   |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 2,050,000   |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                       |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 79,177      |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 79,177      |  
|Net loss                                                     |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   | (8,013,479  | ) |  |   | (8,013,479  | )
|                                                             |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2004                                   |  |      |        |           |  | 23,250                               |   |  |              | 23  |                |  | 112,649,650 |                            |   | 112,650 |                     |   | 2,000  |       |  |   | 11,293,919  |   |  |   | (16,791,257 | ) |  |   | (5,382,665  | )
|                                                             |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                            |  | (8)  |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  | 1,725,000   |                            |   | 1,725   |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 14,709,660  |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 14,711,385  |  
|Conversion of convertible notes                              |  | (6)  |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  | 4,228,000   |                            |   | 4,228   |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 10,326,773  |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 10,331,001  |  
|Conversion of convertible preferred stock                    |  | (7)  |        |           |  | (23,250                              | ) |  |              | (23 | )              |  | 4,325,000   |                            |   | 4,325   |                     |   | (2,000 | )     |  |   | (2,303      | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   | (1          | )
|Exercise of options                                          |  | (10) |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  | 123,466     |                            |   | 123     |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 82,880      |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 83,003      |  
|Issuance of warrant for cash                                 |  | (9)  |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 75          |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 75          |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                       |  | (11) |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 1,812,010   |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 1,812,010   |  
|Warrants exercised                                           |  | (12) |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  | 848,482     |                            |   | 848     |                     |   |        |       |  |   | (848        | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   |            |  
|Net loss                                                     |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   | (12,365,921 | ) |  |   | (12,365,921 | )
|                                                             |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2005                                   |  |      |        |           |  |                                     |   |  | $            |    |                |  | 123,899,598 |                            | $ | 123,899 |                     | $ |       |       |  | $ | 38,222,166  |   |  | $ | (29,157,178 | ) |  | $ | 9,188,887   |  
|                                                             |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Warrants exercised                                           |  | (12) |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  | 89,116      |                            |   | 89      |                     |   |        |       |  |   | (86         | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   | 3           |  
|Option and warrant derivative                                |  | (13) |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   | (12,209,055 | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   | (12,209,055 | )
|Stock based compensation                                     |  | (11) |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   | 276,172     |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 276,172     |  
|Net loss (unaudited)                                         |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   | (6,947,435  | ) |  |   | (6,947,435  | )
|                                                             |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Balance, March 31, 2006 (restated)                           |  |      |        |           |  |                                     |   |  | $            |    |                |  | 123,988,714 |                            | $ | 123,988 |                     | $ |       |       |  | $ | 26,289,197  |   |  | $ | (36,104,613 | ) |  | $ | (9,691,428  | )
|                                                             |  |      |        |           |  |                                      |   |  |              |     |                |  |             |                            |   |         |                     |   |        |       |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  

---

|(1) | Multiple transactions valued at the per share price in the year ended December 31, 1998
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Multiple transactions valued at the per share price in the year ended December 31, 1999
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Multiple transactions valued at the per share price in the year ended December 31, 2000
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Preferred stock converted to common stock
|--- | -----------------------------------------

|(5) | Offering costs
|--- | --------------

|(6) | Multiple transactions at $2.00 and $4.00 in the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Multiple transactions at 100:1 conversion rate in the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | Public offering of 1,725,000 common shares at $10.00 per share
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------

|(9) | Underwriters warrants sold with the public offering
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------

|(10) | Multiple employee option exercises (exercise price range $0.30- $2.00)
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

|(11) | Stock options to directors and employees
|---- | ----------------------------------------

|(12) | Warrants exercised (exercise price $0.80)
|---- | -----------------------------------------

|(13) | Reclassification of option and warrant derivatives from equity to liability in accordance with EITF 00-19
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005, AND 2006 AND FOR

THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 11, 1998 (INCEPTION) TO MARCH 31, 2006 (UNAUDITED)



|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------- | ---------- | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ---------- | ----------- |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                            |  |     |  | For the Three Month Periods Ended March 31, |            |   | For the Period from March 11, 1998 (Inception) to March 31, 2006 Restated |  
|                                                                            |  |     |  | 2005                                        |            |   | 2006 Restated                                                             |   |           
|                                                                            |  |     |  | (Unaudited)                                 |            |   | (Unaudited)                                                               |   |            | (Unaudited) | 
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                       |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Net loss                                                                    |  |     |  | $                                           | (3,265,166 | ) |                                                                           | $ | (6,947,435 | )           |  | $ | (36,104,613 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |  | (a) |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Depreciation                                                                |  |     |  |                                             | 1,533      |   |                                                                           |   | 4,028      |             |  |   | 24,264      |  
|Amortization of benefit conversion feature                                  |  |     |  |                                             | 710,001    |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | 2,050,000   |  
|Amortization of deferred debt financing costs                               |  |     |  |                                             | 712,664    |   |                                                                           |   | 14,380     |             |  |   | 2,150,095   |  
|Stock based compensation                                                    |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 276,172    |             |  |   | 2,370,432   |  
|Warrants issued for services rendered                                       |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | 119,744     |  
|Amortization of warrants derivatives                                        |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 22,068     |             |  |   | 22,068      |  
|Amortization of conversion feature                                          |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 42,298     |             |  |   | 42,298      |  
|Amortization of interest on conversion feature                              |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 33,587     |             |  |   | 33,587      |  
|Adjustments to fair value of derivatives                                    |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   | 1,525,639  |             |  |   | 1,525,639   |  
|Adjustments to fair value of derivativesWarrant and Option Derivatives     |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 1,181,670  |             |  |   | 1,181,670   |  
|Equity in loss of unconsolidated investee                                   |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | 15,000      |  
|(Increase) decrease in:                                                     |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Due from an affiliate                                                       |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | (102,568   | )           |  |   | (103,975    | )
|Prepaid expenses                                                            |  |     |  |                                             | (229,250   | ) |                                                                           |   | (307,158   | )           |  |   | (756,439    | )
|Other assets                                                                |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | (41,750     | )
|(Increase) decrease in:                                                     |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Due to affiliate                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 148,032    |             |  |   | 148,032     |  
|Accounts payable                                                            |  |     |  |                                             | (324,477   | ) |                                                                           |   | 326,757    |             |  |   | 501,516     |  
|Accrued payroll and payroll taxes                                           |  |     |  |                                             | 649        |   |                                                                           |   | (46,533    | )           |  |   | 78,897      |  
|Accrued interest                                                            |  |     |  |                                             | 120,907    |   |                                                                           |   | 90,657     |             |  |   | 91,091      |  
|Accrued rent                                                                |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 64,296     |             |  |   | 64,296      |  
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Net cash used in operating activities                                       |  | (a) |  |                                             | (2,273,139 | ) |                                                                           |   | (3,674,110 | )           |  |   | (26,588,148 | )
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                       |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Purchase of InvestmentRestricted Cash                                      |  |     |  |                                             | (289       | ) |                                                                           |   | (888       | )           |  |   | (138,251    | )
|Proceeds from sale of restricted cash                                       |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | (6,026      | )
|Purchase of property and equipment                                          |  |     |  |                                             | (2,339     | ) |                                                                           |   | (404,788   | )           |  |   | (618,121    | )
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Net cash (used in) investing activities                                     |  | (b) |  |                                             | (2,628     | ) |                                                                           |   | (405,676   | )           |  |   | (762,398    | )
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Cash flows from financing activities                                        |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Net proceeds from sale of common stock                                      |  |     |  |                                             | 15,577,898 |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | 19,451,972  |  
|Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants                              |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 3          |             |  |   | 83,006      |  
|Proceeds from sale of preferred stock                                       |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | 520,400     |  
|Proceeds from issuance of notes payables                                    |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | 14,092,200  |  
|Deferred debt financing cost                                                |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | (1,553,000 | )           |  |   | 3,688,713   |  
|Proceeds from notes payable issued under Reg D                              |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   | 20,000,000 |             |  |   | 20,800,000  |  
|Cash paid for deferred offering costs                                       |  |     |  |                                             |           |   |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   | (866,512    | )
|Due to net increase (decrease) in affiliates                                |  |     |  |                                             | (522,719   | ) |                                                                           |   |           |             |  |   |            |  
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Net cash provided by financing activities                                   |  | (c) |  |                                             | 15,055,179 |   |                                                                           |   | 18,447,003 |             |  |   | 50,392,353  |  
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                            |  |     |  |                                             | 12,779,411 |   |                                                                           |   | 14,367,217 |             |  |   | 23,041,807  |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                            |  |     |  |                                             | 4,530,221  |   |                                                                           |   | 8,674,590  |             |  |   |            |  
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                  |  |     |  | $                                           | 17,309,632 |   |                                                                           | $ | 23,041,807 |             |  | $ | 23,041,807  |  
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Interest paid                                                               |  |     |  | $                                           | 112,304    |   |                                                                           | $ |           |             |  | $ | 1,361,635   |  
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  
|Income taxes paid                                                           |  |     |  | $                                           |           |   |                                                                           | $ |           |             |  | $ | 6,000       |  
|                                                                            |  |     |  |                                             |            |   |                                                                           |   |            |             |  |   |             |  

---

|(a) | Including amount with related parties of $259,649, $1,863,467 and $10,385,528, respectively
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Including amount with related parties of $0, $0 and $0, respectively
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Including amount with related parties of $0, ($1,456,587) and ($3,592,300), respectively
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Financing Activities

During the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006, the
Company issued 0, 0 and 99,750,000 shares of post-split adjusted common stock to founders, respectively.

During the three month periods
ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006, the Company issued 0, 0 and 583,000 shares of post-split adjusted common stock for services, respectively.

During the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006, the
Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature in connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable Series II and Series IIa in the amount of $0, $0 and $2,050,000, respectively.

During the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31 2006, 2,500,
0, and 52,850 shares of convertible preferred stock were converted into 250,000, 0, and 5,285,000 shares of common stock, respectively.

During the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006, $10,341,000 $0, and $14,862,200 of convertible notes payable were converted into 3,782,500,
0, and 5,877,550 shares of common stock, respectively.

In March 2006, 100,000 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.80 were exercised on
a cashless basis in exchange for 89,116 shares of common stock. The remaining balance of $3 was paid in cash upon exercise of the warrants on a cashless basis.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The
information contained in this report is unaudited, but in our opinion reflects all adjustments necessary to make the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods a fair presentation of our operations and cash flows. All such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

These financial statements should be
read along with the financial statements and notes that go along with our audited financial statements, as well as other financial information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Financial
presentations for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.

2. RESTATEMENT

The Company has restated its unaudited financial statements as of March 31, 2006 and for the three months then ended, and the related notes to
the financial statements.

This Amendment is to correct an error in identifying certain financial instruments as derivatives in the
application of certain accounting principles related to the issuance of the Companys convertible note financing and the impact of such accounting principles on previously issued and vested non-employee stock option and warrant
transactions in prior periods. The previously recorded transactions were properly treated as equity transactions at the time of their respective issuances. Upon the sale of the Companys convertible notes on March 20, 2006, more
recent accounting practices, as more fully set forth below, require the previously issued and vested non-employee options and warrants to be reclassified as derivative liabilities. The reclassification of previously issued and vested options and
warrants as derivative instruments requires the Companys financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2006 to be restated.

The convertible note agreements entered into on March 20, 2006 and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on March 22, 2006 contain variable share settlement provisions. These provisions require the Company to reclassify, at fair
value, previously issued and vested options and warrants from additional paid in capital to derivative liability accounts on the balance sheet in accordance with EITF 00-19 Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and
Potentially Settled in a Companys Own Stock (EITF 00-19). The reason for this reclassification is the possibility that the Company may not have enough authorized unissued common stock to meet all of its commitments in
the delivery of the Companys common stock to honor both the contracts related to the convertible notes and the previously issued and vested option and warrant contracts. In order to be in the situation of not having enough unissued shares to
deliver to the option and warrant holders, the fair market value of the common stock of the Company would have to be lower than all of the exercise prices of all the option and warrant contracts. In such case, an option or warrant holder would have
to exercise his or her options or warrants at a price that would require him or her to pay more than the fair market value of the common stock on the open market. Nonetheless, according to EITF 00-19 the previously recorded transactions must be
reclassified from equity to liability. In addition, further analysis indicates the previously issued options and warrants identified as derivative instruments require separate valuation under FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.

The purpose of this amendment is to restate, at fair value, previously issued and vested options and warrants as
derivative liabilities as of the date of issuance of the convertible notes and to adjust fair values as of March 31, 2006 through the statement of operations for options and warrant derivatives previously classified in equity, pursuant to EITF
00-19.

The following table shows the impact of these restatements on the financial statements at March 31, 2006:



|                                                                         |  |                                 |             |   |             |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- | ----------- | - | ----------- | - | ----------- | --------------------- |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                         |  | PreviouslyReportedMarch 31 2006 |             |   | Adjustments |   |             | RestatedMarch 31 2006 | 
|BALANCE SHEET                                                            |  |                                 |             |   |             |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|Warrant derivative                                                       |  | $                               |            |   |             | $ | 1,505,000   |                       |  | $ | 1,505,000   |  
|Options derivative                                                       |  |                                 |            |   |             |   | 11,885,725  |                       |  |   | 11,885,725  |  
|Total Liabilities                                                        |  |                                 | 22,506,428  |   |             |   | 13,390,725  |                       |  |   | 35,897,153  |  
|Additional Paid in Capital                                               |  |                                 | 38,498,252  |   |             |   | (12,209,053 | )                     |  |   | 26,289,199  |  
|Deficit accumulated during the development stage                         |  |                                 | (34,922,943 | ) |             |   | (1,181,670  | )                     |  |   | (36,104,613 | )
|Total stockholders equity (deficit)                                     |  |                                 | 3,699,297   |   |             |   | (13,390,725 | )                     |  |   | (9,691,428  | )
|STATEMENT OF CASHFLOWS                                                   |  |                                 |             |   |             |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|Adjustment to fair value of derivatives - warrant and option derivatives |  |                                 |            |   |             |   | 1,181,670   |                       |  |   | 1,181,670   |  
|STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS                                                  |  |                                 |             |   |             |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|Adjustment to fair value of derivatives - warrant and option derivatives |  |                                 |            |   |             |   | (1,181,670  | )                     |  |   | (1,181,670  | )
|Net income (loss)                                                        |  |                                 | (5,765,765  | ) |             |   | (1,181,670  | )                     |  |   | (6,947,435  | )
|Loss per share                                                           |  |                                 |             |   |             |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|Basic loss per share                                                     |  |                                 | (0.05       | ) |             |   | (0.01       | )                     |  |   | (0.06       | )
|Diluted loss per share                                                   |  |                                 | (0.05       | ) |             |   | (0.01       | )                     |  |   | (0.06       | )
|Shares used to calculate loss per share                                  |  |                                 |             |   |             |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|Basic earnings (loss) per share                                          |  |                                 | 120,380,475 |   |             |   |            |                       |  |   | 120,380,475 |  
|Diluted earnings (loss) per share                                        |  |                                 | 120,380,475 |   |             |   |            |                       |  |   | 120,380,475 |  

3. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (formerly CardioVascular Genetic Engineering, Inc.) (Cardio) or (the Company) is a
development stage biopharmaceutical company, which is focused on developing and marketing protein drug candidates which are designed to be used in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Cardio was incorporated in Delaware on March 11, 1998
(Inception) as CardioVascular Genetic Engineering, Inc. and in February 2004, changed its name to CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. Since inception it has been engaged in research and development activities associated with bringing
its products to market.

4. TRANSACTIONS AND CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH AFFILIATED ENTITIES

Cardio is a member of an affiliated group, through common management, which includes Phage Biotechnology Corporation (Phage), Cardio Phage
International (CPI), Sribna Culya Biopharmaceuticals Inc. (Sribna), Proteomics Biopharmaceuticals Technologies Inc. (Proteomics), Zhittya Stem Cell Medical Research Company Inc. (Zhittya), Qure
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Qure), known collectively as the (affiliates). The common management of Cardio and Phage spend a sufficient amount of their time with each company to satisfy the needs for each company and the
remaining balance to other interests.

Daniel C. Montano, John W. Jacobs and Mickael A. Flaa are, respectively, Chairman of the Board/Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer/Chief Scientific Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of both Cardio and Phage. Upon completion of the public offering, Mr. Flaa and Mr. Jacobs joined Cardios board of directors. In
addition, Alexander G. Montano, one of the Companys current board members and the son of Daniel C. Montano, is also a board member of Phage. Daniel C. Montano is a principal stockholder in Cardio, Phage, Proteomics, Zhittya, and Qure.
Daniel C. Montano, Dr. Thomas Stegmann and Mr. Jacobs are members of the Board of Directors of CPI. Mr. Grant Gordon, one of the Companys current Board members, is a member of the Board of Directors of CPI and is CPIs President. Mr.
Flaa, one of the Companys current Board members and the companys CFO, is CPIs CFO.

The following are or were the
business activities performed by each affiliate:



| |  |  | Phage is a developer of recombinant protein pharmaceuticals; certain of the Companys officers and directors control 38.4% and the Company controls 4.5% of the
common stock of Phage;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



9



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



| |  |  | CPI is a distributor for the future products for both Cardio and Phage in locations throughout the world other than North America, Europe, Japan, and, with respect
to Cardio only, the Republic of Korea, China, and Taiwan. Cardio and Phage each own approximately 43% of CPI and each is able to appoint 45% of CPIs directors;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Sribna was developing a treatment for cancer utilizing cancer cell apoptosis (currently inactive);
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Proteomics was developing a non-injection method for medical protein (currently inactive);
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Zhittya was researching adult stem cells (currently inactive); and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Qure was developing commercial medical applications.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------

During the period from 1999 through 2001, the Company entered into transactions with these entities affiliated with the Companys CEO (Proteomics, Zhittya, Qure and Sribna). These companies paid expenses on
behalf of the Company aggregating $187,600. That amount was repaid without interest. These entities are all currently inactive. Additionally, Qure owns 630,000 shares of common stock of the Company.

License Agreement

Cardio has a Joint Patent
Ownership and License Agreement with Phage. Under that agreement, Cardio and Phage, respectively, own an undivided one half interest in the U.S. and foreign patent rights necessary to develop and commercialize Cardio Vascu-Grow; and Phage agrees to provide certain technical
development services to Cardio and to manufacture Cardio Vascu-Grow for Cardios clinical trials at cost. Any product Phage manufactures for Cardio commercialization purposes is paid for on a percentage of sales basis as defined in the agreement. As a part of this agreement,
Cardio is obligated, at its option, to either (i) pay to Phage ten percent of net sales for Cardio Vascu-Grow manufactured for Cardio by Phage or (ii) pay to Phage a six percent royalty based on Cardios net sales price of
Cardio Vascu-Grow that Phage does not manufacture for Cardio. This agreement expires on the last to expire of the patent rights covered, including extensions.

Currently it is the Companys intention to contract with Phage for manufacturing of Cardio
Vascu-Grow for the ongoing FDA trials
and for further commercial production. However, Cardio has the right to and may choose to use a third party for manufacturing. As of March 31, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $23,180,058 indicating
that the Company has sufficient funds to be a viable entity on an ongoing basis should it choose to use a third party manufacturer.

Phage will manufacture the drug for Cardio in the United States clinical trials, and may manufacture it for subsequent commercial production. Phage has three drugs that have been approved by the FDA to be administered to humans in clinical
trials indicating Phage is capable of manufacturing drug products to acceptable standards.

Furthermore, Cardio paid Phage for technical development services and for manufacture of Cardio Vascu-Grow for clinical trials, which Phage provided to Cardio at cost. For the three months March 31, 2005 (unaudited), and 2006 (unaudited) and the period
from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited) payments to Phage relating to such services were $97,535, $326,205 and $1,889,210, respectively.

Administrative Support

For the three months March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and
the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited) Phage provided Cardio with administrative support in Phages research facility and billed Cardio for Phages actual costs incurred plus Cardios
pro-rata share (based on costs



10



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



incurred for Cardio as compared to total Phage overhead costs) of Phages overhead costs. Payments to Phage for such support for the three months ended
March 31, 2005(unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited) were $41,005, $55,031 and $1,070,489, respectively.

Distribution Agreement

Cardio and Phage have entered into a distribution agreement with Cardio Phage International Inc., a Bahamian company (CPI), to handle future distribution of Cardio Vascu-Growand any other products licensed to CPI when available for commercial distribution. CPIs territory is limited to
areas other than the United States, Canada, Europe (as defined as the Ural Mountains west including Iceland, excluding Turkey and Cyprus), Japan and with respect to Cardio only the Republic of Korea, the Republic of China and Taiwan. Phage and
Cardio each own approximately 43% of the CPI outstanding stock and the companies have the right to each appoint 45% of the CPI board. Cardio has made no payments to CPI and does not anticipate making any payments in the near future.

As of December 31, 2003, the Companys 43% interest in Cardio Phage International (CPI), was being accounted for under the equity method. As of
December 31, 2004 the Companys statement of operations includes a loss of $15,000, which represents the Companys equity in loss on its investment in CPI. The loss reduced the Companys investment in CPI to zero and, as a
consequence, the Companys future financial results will not be negatively affected by CPIs ongoing operations. The Company has no obligation to fund future operating losses nor has any guarantees on any of CPIs obligations. There
is no material difference between our carrying value for CPI and underlying equity in CPIs net assets. There is no quoted market price for CPIs net assets. There is no quoted market price for CPIs shares.

Royalty Agreement

Cardio has entered into an agreement with Dr. Stegmann, one of the Companys directors and Chief Clinical Officer, whereby Cardio will pay Dr. Stegmann a royalty of one percent of the Companys net
revenue (as defined) from commercial sales of Cardio Vascu-Grow in exchange for rights granted to Cardio to utilize the results of Dr. Stegmanns German clinical trials. This agreement terminates on December 31, 2013. Cardio has made no payments to
Dr. Stegmann under this agreement.

Asia Distribution Agreement

On December 15, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Korea Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd. (KBDC) to commercialize Cardios future products. Cardio transferred to KBDC the rights
to manufacture and sell its products for 99 years in all of Korea, China, and Taiwan. In exchange, KBDC arranged the purchase of 8,750,000 shares of Cardios common stock for $3,602,000. KBDC agreed to fund all of the regulatory approval
process in Korea for any products of Cardio. In addition, KBDC agreed to pay a royalty of 10% of net revenues to Cardio. The royalties will be paid for the life of the agreement. Daniel C. Montano, the Companys chairman, owns 17% of KBDC and
is a former member of the board of directors. KBDC invested $200,000 in each of Sribna, Proteomics and Zhittya and invested $60,000 in CPI.

Guarantee
of Rental Agreements for Phage

CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the Company) entered into a Standard Lease Guaranty
(the Lease Guaranty) dated March 15, 2006 with Canta Rana Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership and Phage Biotechnology Corporation (Phage), (the Lease Agreement). Phage is an affiliated private
biotechnology company that manufactures recombinant protein drugs and is the Companys sole supplier of Cardio



11



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



Vascu-Grow. Pursuant to the Lease Guaranty, the Company guarantees full performance of all of Phages obligations under the Lease Agreement.

In exchange for the Companys guarantee of the Lease Agreement, Phage entered into an
Indemnity and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006. Phage will pay the Company certain fees payable on the first day of each calendar month which will be the sum of the following amounts (collectively, Guaranty Fees):
(a) one-tenth (1/10th) of one percent (1%) of the remaining aggregate amount of the Minimum Monthly
Rent due under the Lease Agreement from the period from May 1, 2006 to the Expiration Date of the Lease Agreement; and (b) one-tenth (1/10th) of one percent (1%) of the remaining aggregate amount of Additional Rent due under the Lease Agreement following the payment of Additional Rent. Any amount of Guaranty Fees not paid by
Phage on the first calendar day of each month shall accrue interest at the lesser of twelve percent (12%) per annum or the maximum rate allowable by law until paid.

If Phage defaults on payment of the Minimum Monthly Rent or the Additional Rent, which monthly payments aggregate approximately $20,000, the Company is obligated pursuant to the Lease Guaranty to pay to the lessor the
rents in default. The Companys maximum contingent liability is approximately $1,837,000 as of March 15, 2006 and will decrease by approximately $20,000 per month as Minimum Monthly Rent and the Additional Rent are paid by Phage.

Phage has indemnified the Company for any amounts required to be paid by the Company pursuant to the Lease Guaranty in the Indemnity and
Reimbursement Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006.

The lease guarantee is irrevocably released when Phage provides to Canta Rana
Ranch, L.P. a bank statement showing $5,000,000 in cash in the bank.

On August 2004, the Company guaranteed Phages obligations under
a non-cancelable operating lease for laboratory and office space at University of California Irvine Research Center. The lease is for 11,091 rentable square feet for the period March 1, 2004 through August 31, 2006, and provides for a monthly rent
of approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses. During 2004 and 2005, the Company sub-leased space from Phage for approximately $2,800 per month as part of the agreement for administrative services.

Guaranty from Daniel C. Montano

On March 20,
2006, Daniel C. Montano, the Companys Chairman, President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all obligations of the Company resulting from the sale on March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured
notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the later of March 20, 2007 or the first date on which the Company receives revenue from sale of drugs in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient after such drug has been approved by the FDA, provided that
on such date the Company is not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate upon
the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into the Companys common stock.

After the Companys
obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano had been required to make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, the
Company will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the date reimbursed by the Company.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



In addition, in August 2004, the Company guaranteed Phages obligations under a non-cancelable
operating lease.

5. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Development Stage Enterprise

The Company is a development stage company as defined in Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises. The Company is devoting substantially all of its present efforts to its formation, fundraising, and product
development and approval. Its planned principal operations of selling its pharmaceutical products have not yet commenced. For the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) through March 31, 2006 (unaudited), the Company has accumulated a
deficit of $36,104,613. There can be no assurance that the Company will have sufficient funds available to complete its research and development programs or be able to commercially manufacture or market any products in the future, that future
revenue will be significant, or that any sales will be profitable. The Company expects operating losses to increase for at least the next several three months due principally to the anticipated expenses associated with the proposed product
development, clinical trials and various research and development activities.

Stock Split

In February 2004, the Board of Directors approved, with the approval of the shareholders, a forward 100-to-1 common stock split. The accompanying
financial statements and notes to the financial statements have been retrospectively restated to reflect this split.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. The most significant estimates relate to compensation expense for options, warrants and common stock issued for services.

Cash and
Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flow, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

As of December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 (unaudited), the restricted cash consists of $137,363 and $138,251, respectively. The restricted cash is
required as collateral for the Companys credit card holders.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of the related asset, which management believes is 3 to 5 years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred whereas major betterments and renewals are capitalized.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



Deferred Rent

The Company accounts for property leases with escalation provisions and tenant improvement allowances on a straight line basis resulting in a consistent charge to the statement of operations over the life of the lease. In the early years of
the lease the Company recognizes a liability for excess straight line amounts over the actual rent paid. This liability begins to reduce in the later years of the lease.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which
requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the
tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the
differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For certain of the Companys financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and accrued compensation, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to
their short maturities.

Valuation of Derivative Instruments

FAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In
determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses Black-Scholes Model. Derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as
Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants are valued using Black-Scholes Models.

Research and Development Costs

The Company accounts for research and development costs in accordance
with SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs. Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred. Research and development costs consist of expenses incurred by third party consultants,
contractors, clinical research organizations, and suppliers in support of preclinical research and FDA clinical trials.

Non-monetary Transactions

Common stock issued for goods or services is recorded at estimated market value of the common stock issued or the services
performed, whichever is more readily determinable.

Deferred Debt Financing Costs

Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable are capitalized as deferred debt financing costs. These costs primarily
include commissions paid to the placement agent and are amortized over



14



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



the term of the convertible notes on a straight line basis. At March 31, 2005, there were none of these costs and $1,553,000 at March 31, 2006
(unaudited). During the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006, the company amortized $716,664, $14,380, and $2,150,095.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company places its
cash and cash equivalent with high quality financial institutions, and at times it may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation $100,000 insurance limit. As of December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 (unaudited), uninsured portions of
cash amounted to $8,596,051 and $22,980,058 respectively.

Loss per Share

The Company calculates loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Basic loss per share is computed by dividing
the loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Because the Company has incurred net losses, basic and diluted loss per share are the same.

The following potential common shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2005,
and March 31, 2006 (unaudited) since their effect would have been anti-dilutive:



|                          |  |                  |  |              
|------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | -------------
|                          |  | December 31,2005 |  | March 31,2006
|Stock options             |  | 3,161,000        |  | 3,212,250    
|Warrants                  |  | 375,000          |  | 980,882      
|Convertible notes payable |  |                 |  | 1,666,667    

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R) (revised 2004), Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)). SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes our previous accounting under SFAS 123 for periods beginning
in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to SFAS 123(R). The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123(R). Our Company has
used the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to employees and consultants since our inception and therefore this method represents no significant change in our accounting for options and warrant
issuances.

SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards to employees and directors on the date
of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in our Statements of Operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the
Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the method as allowed under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(SFAS 123).



15



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the
application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. Based on the terms of our plans, our Company did not have a cumulative effect related to its plans. Our Company also elected to continue to estimate the fair value of stock options using
the Black-Scholes-Merton formula. Since the Companys policy has always been to expense the issuance of options using the fair value based method using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula (Black-Scholes model) there is no difference
in the basic and diluted loss per share. Further, we believe the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will not have a material impact on our Companys future stock-based compensation expense.

There were no options granted during the quarter ended March 31, 2005, therefore there was no stock-based compensation expense related to employees or
directors stock options recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2005. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for employees and directors for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $276,170. The estimated fair
value of options granted to employees and directors during the quarter ended March, 31, 2006, was $240,254. Assumptions used to value the options granted were expected volatility of 76%, risk-free interest rate of 4.785%, weighted average expected
lives of 5 years and expected dividend yield of zero.

The Company determined the of fair value of share-based payment awards to employees
and directors on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model, which is affected by the Companys stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited
to the Company expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards. Prior to 2006, when valuing awards the Company used the Awards contractual term as a proxy for its expected terms. For new grants after December 31, 2005, the Company
estimate expected term using the safe harbor provisions provided in SAB 107. The Company used historical data to estimate forfeitures which the Company estimated to be none.

The Company has elected to adopt the detailed method provided in SFAS 123(R) for calculating the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool
(APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Statements of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding
upon adoption of SFAS 123(R).

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections an amendment to
Accounting Principles Bulletin (APB) Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements though SFAS No. 154 carries forward the guidance in APB No. 20 and SFAS No.
3 with respect to accounting for changes in estimates, changes in reporting entity, and the correction of errors. SFAS No. 154 establishes new standards on accounting for changes in accounting principles, whereby all such changes must be accounted
for by retrospective application to the financial statements of prior periods unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with
early adoption permitted for changes and corrections made in years beginning after May 2005. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 154 with no effect on the Financial Statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments. This standard amends the guidance in FASB
Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments



16



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



of Liabilities. Statement 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate
the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact FASB 155 will have on our financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets (SFAS NO. 156), which provides an
approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, with respect to the
accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Statement (1) requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by
entering into a servicing contract in certain situations; (2) requires that a separately recognized servicing asset or servicing liability be initially measured at fair value, if practicable; (3) permits an entity to choose either the
amortization method or the fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of separately recognized servicing assets or servicing liabilities; (4) permits at initial adoption a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale
securities to trading securities by an entity with recognized servicing rights, provided the securities reclassified offset the entitys exposure to changes in the fair value of the servicing assets or liabilities; and (5) requires
separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the balance sheet and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is
effective for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted in certain circumstances. The Statement also
describes the manner in which it should be initially applied. The Company does not believe that SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

6. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH

Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following at December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 (unaudited):



|                |  |                  |           |               |   |           
|--------------- |  | ---------------- | --------- | ------------- | - | ----------
|                |  | December 31,2005 |           | March 31,2006
|Cash in bank    |  | $                | 8,674,590 |               | $ | 23,041,807
|Restricted cash |  |                  | 137,363   |               |   | 138,251   
|                |  |                  |           |               |   |           
|Total           |  | $                | 8,811,953 |               | $ | 23,180,058
|                |  |                  |           |               |   |           

7. PREPAID AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaid assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 (unaudited):



|                                |  |                  |         |               |   |        
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ------- | ------------- | - | -------
|                                |  | December 31,2005 |         | March 31,2006
|Prepaid clinical trial costs(a) |  | $                | 203,834 |               | $ | 72,594 
|Prepaid insurance (b)           |  |                  | 71,726  |               |   | 369,179
|Prepaid legal fees(c)           |  |                  | 60,652  |               |   | 59,562 
|Prepaid trade shows(d)          |  |                  | 84,593  |               |   | 93,330 
|Prepaid other(e)                |  |                  | 28,476  |               |   | 161,774
|                                |  |                  |         |               |   |        
|                                |  | $                | 449,281 |               | $ | 756,439
|                                |  |                  |         |               |   |        

---

|(a) | Includes prepaid amounts associated with clinical trials conducted by contractors such as: bioRASI and Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc. These amounts are to be applied
against the final invoices and will be recognized in the Statement of Operations as research and development upon the completion of these trials.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Includes prepaid insurance associated with directors and officers which is amortized over a 12 month period to the Statement of Operations as general and administrative
expense (includes $350,000 insurance payment).
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Includes prepaid legal fees associated with investor relations programs, SEC counsel, tax advisory services and legal retainer fees. Legal prepayments are retainer amounts that are
required by our legal providers to initiate services. These retainers remain recorded as prepaid until the relationship or the project is completed. At that time, these retainers will be recognized in our Statement of Operations as legal
expense.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(d) | Includes prepaid amounts associated with trade shows in San Francisco, London, Las Vegas, and Washington D.C. These items will be recognized in the Statement of
Operations as general and administrative expense as they occur.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(e) | Includes $72,958 prepaid amounts associated with consultants who are paid in the beginning of each month. These items will be recognized in the Statement of Operations
as general and administrative expense as they occur.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



17



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



8. PROPERTY

Property and equipment consisted of the following:



|                                                       |  |                  |         |   |               |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------- | ------- | - | ------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                       |  | December 31,2005 |         |   | March 31,2006 |  
|Furniture, fixtures, and equipment                     |  | $                | 166,443 |   |               | $ | 341,031 |  
|Scientific equipment                                   |  |                  | 46,890  |   |               |   | 59,860  |  
|Leasehold Improvements                                 |  |                  |        |   |               |   | 217,230 |  
|Less accumulated depreciation                          |  |                  | (14,210 | ) |               |   | (18,238 | )
|                                                       |  |                  |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Property and equipment net of accumulated depreciation |  | $                | 199,123 |   |               | $ | 599,883 |  
|                                                       |  |                  |         |   |               |   |         |  

Depreciation expense for the periods ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited)
and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited) were $1,533, $4,028 and $24,364, respectively.

9. DUE TO AND
FROM AFFILIATES

Due to/from affiliates at December 31, 2005 and Mach 31, 2006 (unaudited) consisted of the following:



|               |  |                   |       |                |   |          |  
|-------------- |  | ----------------- | ----- | -------------- | - | -------- | -
|               |  | December 31, 2005 |       | March 31, 2006 |  
|Due to Phage   |  | $                 |      |                | $ | (148,032 | )
|Due from Phage |  |                   | 1,407 |                |   | 103,975  |  
|               |  |                   |       |                |   |          |  
|Total          |  | $                 | 1,407 |                | $ | (44,057  | )
|               |  |                   |       |                |   |          |  

10. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

Convertible Senior Secured Notes

On March 20, 2006, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement
with accredited investors for the issuance of an aggregate of $20,000,000 principal amount of convertible notes with offering costs of $1,553,000 representing approximately 7.8%. In connection with the closing of the sale of the notes, we received
net proceeds of $18,447,000. The convertible notes are convertible at the option of the holders into 1,666,666 shares of common stock at a fixed conversion price of $12.00 per share (the Fixed Conversion Price) subject to anti-dilution
and other customary adjustments. In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, we also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 705,882 shares of our common stock. The term of the warrants is three years and the exercise price is $8.50
per share.

In addition, the notes are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of the average of the preceding five days
weighted average trading price, if the result is lower than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into the Companys common stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no more than 10% of the original
$20,000,000 note balance per month. The notes mature in March 2009, and bear a resetting floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 7%. The warrants may be exercised anytime up to March 2009. The warrant exercise price is $8.50 per share.
Substantially all of the Companys assets secure the notes.

The Company sold the Notes under the exemption from registration pursuant
to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (Regulation D).



18



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



The Company will incur certain penalties if it fails to file and obtain and maintain the
effectiveness of a registration statement covering the Securities, such as cash payments to the note holders calculated under formulas based on the principal amount of the notes and aggregate exercise price of the warrants. The Company may also
incur cash damages if the Company fails to issue and deliver certificates of its common stock in a timely manner upon receipt of a notice from a note holder to convert all or a portion of the note holders note. The Company may also be required
to redeem all or a portion of the principal amount of a note in the event a conversion fails. Under certain triggering events, the Company may be required to redeem all or a portion of the principal amount of a note in the sum of 120% of the
principal plus applicable interest. Examples of triggering events are: (i) delisting of the Companys securities; (ii) failure of a registration statement to be filed; (iii) failure of a registration statement to become effective; and (iv)
other triggering events. Other terms and conditions that are material to the Company are: (i) after a triggering event the holder of a note has the option to require the Company to pay a redemption price at the option of a note holder; (ii) a
redemption in the event of a change in control at the option of a note holder, (iii) certain events of default; and (iv) the acceleration of payment of a note upon the occurrence of an event of default.

From March 20, 2006 until the first date on which there are no notes outstanding, the Company will have certain restrictions on the payment of dividends
or distributions, whether in cash, stock, equity securities or property, in respect of any capital stock or split, combination or reclassification of any capital stock or issuance or authorization of the issuance of any other securities in respect
of, in lieu of or in substitution for any capital stock or set any record date with respect to any of the foregoing.

In connection with
this financing, closing costs of: (i) $200,000 to purchasers of the notes for legal fees relating to transaction, (ii) an investment banking fee in the amount of $1,200,000 to CK Cooper & Company, a party related to one of the Companys
directors, Alexander G. Montano; and (iii) other expenses related to legal fees in the amount of $153,000. A total of $1,553,000 in transaction fees and expenses were paid by the Company, such that the Company realized net proceeds in the amount of
$18,447,000.

The following table summarizes Convertible note, discount and derivative values outstanding at March 31, 2006:



|                                                                                 |  |   |            |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- | -
|Convertible Notes at face value                                                  |  | $ | 20,000,000 |  
|Discounts on Notes:                                                              |  |   |            |  
|Embedded derivatives                                                             |  |   | (8,195,565 | )
|Warrant derivative                                                               |  |   | (2,383,334 | )
|                                                                                 |  |   |            |  
|Net convertible notes on March 20, 2006 (the closing date)                       |  |   | 9,421,101  |  
|Amortization of discount from derivatives                                        |  |   | 97,954     |  
|                                                                                 |  |   |            |  
|Convertible notes at March 31, 2006                                              |  |   | 9,519,055  |  
|Embedded derivatives at fair value at March 31, 2006                             |  |   | 9,383,722  |  
|Warrant derivative at fair value at March 31, 2006                               |  |   | 2,720,815  |  
|                                                                                 |  |   |            |  
|Convertible notes, embedded derivatives and warrant derivative at March 31, 2006 |  | $ | 21,623,592 |  
|                                                                                 |  |   |            |  

The Company is required to revalue the derivatives in each quarter to determine if the values of
these derivatives have changed from period to period, until the notes are redeemed or converted. An increase in value of these derivatives will result in the Company having to record an expense to the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives on the
Statement of Operations. Conversely, a decrease in the value of these derivatives will result in



19



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



the Company having to record income to the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives on the Statement of Operations. The following table summarizes the
Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives as of March 31, 2006.



|                                                                           |  |                                     |           |                                       |   |                       |  |   |          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- | --------- | ------------------------------------- | - | --------------------- |  | - | ---------
|                                                                           |  | BalanceMarch 20, 2006(closing date) |           | Adjustment toFair Value ofDerivatives |   | BalanceMarch 31, 2006
|Embedded Derivatives                                                       |  | $                                   | 8,195,564 |                                       | $ | 1,188,158             |  | $ | 9,383,722
|Warrant Derivative                                                         |  |                                     | 2,383,334 |                                       |   | 337,481               |  |   | 2,720,815
|                                                                           |  |                                     |           |                                       |   |                       |  |   |          
|Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives included in other income (expense) |  |                                     |           |                                       | $ | 1,525,639             |  |   |          
|                                                                           |  |                                     |           |                                       |   |                       |  |   |          

Of the total proceeds from the issuance of the notes and warrants, $2,383,334 was
allocated to the free standing warrants associated with the notes based upon the fair value of the warrants. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Model for determining the initial fair value of the warrants were as follows: (1) dividend yield
of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 74.6%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.595%, and (4) expected life of 3 years. In accordance with FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, EITF 00-19 Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in a Companys Own Stock and EITF 05-04 The Effect of a Liquidated Damages Clause on a Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to EITF Issue No. 00-19, the
amounts allocated to the warrant represent a derivative liability that has been recorded in the accompanying balance sheet at March 31, 2006. The carrying value of warrant derivative at March 31, 2006 has been adjusted to reflect its fair
value of $2,720,815 based upon fair values computed under the Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 74.5%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.875% and (4) expected remaining life
of 2.97 years. During the period ended March 31, 2006, an increase in the fair value of the conversion feature liability of $337,481 was recorded through results of operations as a charge to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.



|                             |  |                          |           |                          |   |          
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --------- | ------------------------ | - | ---------
|Warrant Derivative Liability |  | Fair ValueMarch 20, 2006 |           | Fair ValueMarch 31, 2006
|                             |  | (unaudited)              |           | (unaudited)             
|Warrant Derivative           |  | $                        | 2,383,334 |                          | $ | 2,720,815
|                             |  |                          |           |                          |   |          

The agreement included other embedded derivatives that required separate valuation in
accordance with the requirements of FAS 133, EITF 05-04 and related accounting literature. The following table summarizes the fair values of embedded derivatives at the transaction date of March 20, 2006 and March 31, 2006, followed by a description
of the valuation methodology utilized to determine fair values:



|                              |  |                          |           |                          |   |          
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --------- | ------------------------ | - | ---------
|Embedded Derivative Liability |  | Fair valueMarch 20, 2006 |           | Fair valueMarch 31, 2006
|                              |  | (unaudited)              |           | (unaudited)             
|Conversion Feature            |  | $                        | 4,568,164 |                          | $ | 5,259,259
|Interest Conversion Feature   |  |                          | 3,627,400 |                          |   | 4,124,463
|                              |  |                          |           |                          |   |          
|Embedded Derivatives          |  | $                        | 8,195,564 |                          | $ | 9,383,722
|                              |  |                          |           |                          |   |          

On March 20, 2006, the fair value of the derivative for the Conversion Feature was determined to
be $4,568,164 using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following inputs: (1) The stock and exercise price was based on the maximum conversion price of $12.00 as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected



20



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



volatility of 74.6%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.595%, and (4) expected remaining life of 3.0 years. The carrying value of warrant derivative at March
31, 2006 has been adjusted to reflect its fair value of $5,259,259 based upon a Black Scholes calculation as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 74.5%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.875%, and (4) expected
remaining life of 2.97 years. During the period ended March 31, 2006, an increase in the fair value of the conversion feature liability of $691,095 was recorded through results of operations as a credit to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

On March 20, 2006, the fair value of the derivative for the Interest Conversion Feature was determined to be $3,627,400 using a
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following inputs: (1) The stock and exercise price was based on the a conversion price on the date of the close of $7.15 as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 74.6%, (3)
risk-free interest rate of 4.595%, and (4) expected remaining life of 3.0 years. The carrying value of warrant derivative at March 31, 2006 has been adjusted to reflect its fair value of $4,124,463 based upon a Black Scholes calculation
as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 74.5%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.875%, and (4) expected remaining life of 2.97 years. During the period ended March 31, 2006, an increase in the fair value of the interest
conversion feature liability of approximately $497,063 was recorded through results of operations as a credit to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

The accounting for the notes and warrants resulted in deferred financing costs, discount for warrant derivatives and discount for embedded derivatives. These amounts determined as March 20, 2006, (the date of closing)
will be amortized on a straight line basis into interest expense over the life of notes and warrants. The following table summaries these amounts as of March 31, 2006:



|                                                                                                                |  |                      |           |   |                               |   |           |                                 |  |   |                            |   |  |    |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | --------- | - | ----------------------------- | - | --------- | ------------------------------- |  | - | -------------------------- | - |  | -- | ------- | -
|                                                                                                                |  | DeferredFinanceCosts |           |   | Discount forWarrantDerivative |   |           | Discount forEmbeddedDerivatives |  |   | Addition toInterestExpense |  
|Balance March 20, 2006 (closing date)                                                                           |  | $                    | 1,553,000 |   |                               | $ | 2,383,334 |                                 |  | $ | 8,195,565                  |   |  |    |         |  
|Amortization for the period March 20, 2006 (date of closing) through March 31, 2006 charged to interest expense |  |                      | (14,380   | ) |                               |   | (22,068   | )                               |  |   | (75,885                    | ) |  | ($ | 112,333 | )
|                                                                                                                |  |                      |           |   |                               |   |           |                                 |  |   |                            |   |  |    |         |  
|Remaining deferred costs and discount to be amortized                                                           |  | $                    | 1,538,620 |   |                               | $ | 2,361,266 |                                 |  | $ | 8,119,680                  |   |  |    |         |  
|                                                                                                                |  |                      |           |   |                               |   |           |                                 |  |   |                            |   |  |    |         |  

Daniel C. Montano Guaranty

On March 20, 2006, Daniel C. Montano, the Companys Chairman, President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all obligations of the Company resulting from the sale on March 20,
2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the later of March 20, 2007 or the first date on which the Company receives revenue from sale of drugs in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient after such drug has been
approved by the FDA, provided that on such date the Company is not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing.
However, the guaranty will terminate upon the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into the Companys common stock.

After our obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano had been required to make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our
obligations, we will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the date reimbursed by us.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



Pre IPO Debt

The Company issued convertible debt in the years ended December 31 2002, 2003 and 2004, payable to various individuals, as summarized below. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Series I, Series II
and Series IIa convertible promissory notes were converted into 4,228,000 shares of common stock. Four note holders of convertible notes chose not to convert their notes into common stock and these notes with a total of $30,000 were paid during the
year ended December 31, 2005.

Convertible note holders were required to notify the Company regarding their intent to convert their
convertible notes into common stock in the 30-day period following the completion of the Companys IPO.

Series I Convertible Promissory Notes

The Series I Convertible Promissory Notes were payable in one installment on the earlier of (i) thirty-six months from the date of
issuance or (ii) 30 days after the successful completion of the Companys initial public offering. The notes were convertible at the option of the holder into the Companys common stock. Interest at 7% per annum, compounded
annually, was payable within 30 days of when the notes payable were due or converted into shares of the Companys common stock. The conversion price for each share equaled $2 per share, provided however, if the purchase price of shares at the
completion of the initial public offering was less than $4 per share, the conversion price would have been adjusted to equal 50% of the initial public offering price.

These notes have been converted into common shares. See conversion details Note 10.

Series II Convertible Promissory
Notes

The Series II Convertible Promissory Notes were payable in one installment on the earlier of (i) thirty-six months from the
date of issuance or (ii) 30 days after the successful completion of the Companys initial public offering. The notes were convertible at the option of the holder into the Companys common stock. Interest at 7% per annum,
compounded annually, was payable within 30 days of when the notes payable were due or converted into shares of the Companys common stock. The conversion price for each share equaled $4 per share, provided however, if the purchase price of
shares at the completion of the initial public offering was less than $8 per share, the conversion price would have been adjusted to equal 50% of the initial public offering price.

These notes have been converted into common shares. See conversion details Note 10.

Series IIa Convertible Promissory Notes

In July 2004, the Company sold $800,000 of convertible notes
payable series IIa. The terms of the convertible notes payable series IIa are identical to the terms of the convertible notes payable series II as discussed above.

The convertible promissory notes were payable in one installment on the earlier of (i) thirty-six months from the date of issuance or (ii) 30 days after the successful completion of the Companys
initial public offering. The notes were convertible at the option of the holder into the Companys common stock. Interest at 7% per annum, compounded annually, was payable within 30 days of when the convertible notes payable were due or
converted into shares of the Companys common stock. The conversion price for each share equaled $4 per share, provided however, if the purchase price of shares at the completion of the initial public offering was less than $8 per share, the
conversion price would have been adjusted to equal 50% of the initial public offering price.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



These notes have been converted into common shares. See conversion details Note 10.

Components of Interest Expense

During the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Company issued Series II and Series IIa convertible promissory notes with an imbedded beneficial conversion feature. As such, in accordance with EITF Issue No. 98-5, Accounting for Securities with Beneficial
Conversion Feature or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratio and EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, the difference between the conversion price and the Companys
estimated fair market value of its stock price on the commitment date of the notes was calculated to be $2,050,000. The Companys estimate of fair market value resulting in a beneficial conversion feature was based on the Letter of
Intent with the underwriters. This amount will be recognized in the statement of operations as interest expense during the period from the commitment date of the notes to the maturity dates of the notes.

The Company recognized interest expense resulting from the beneficial conversion feature of $710,001, $0, and $2,050,000, respectively, for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited).

Since the convertible promissory notes have a reset provision upon the completion of the initial public offering, the Company retested the convertible notes payable for the beneficial conversion feature. Where the
Company has issued convertible notes payable with beneficial conversion feature, the difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the common stock, at the effective initial public offering date, will be recorded as a debt discount
and will be amortized to interest expense over the redemption period of the convertible notes payable in accordance with EITF Issue No. 98-5, Accounting for Securities with Beneficial Conversion Feature or Contingently Adjustable
Conversion Ratio and EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments. No additional Beneficial Conversion feature was required to be recovered.

In connection with these convertible notes payable, the Company incurred total financing costs of $2,135,715. These costs had been capitalized and were
being amortized over the term of the convertible notes payable. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006, (unaudited) total
financing costs of $712,664, $0, and $2,135,715, respectively, were charged to interest expense.

For the three months ended March 31,
2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 30, 2006, (unaudited) the interest expense on the Series I, II and IIa convertible notes was $120,907, $0 and $1,385,343, respectively.

11. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

Preferred
Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2005, nine convertible preferred shareholders elected to convert 23,250 of their
preferred shares into 2,325,000 shares of common stock. The 2,000,000 shares of common stock, which as of December 31, 2004 had not been issued but were classified as committed common stock, were issued during this period. At December 31,
2005 all issued preferred stock have been converted into common stock.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

Common Stock

During the period ended December 31, 2004, 11 convertible preferred shareholders elected to convert 28,100 of their convertible preferred shares into 2,810,000 shares of common stock. At December 31, 2004, 2,000,000 shares of
common stock had not been issued and were classified as committed common stock and were subsequently issued in 2005.

During the year ended
December 31, 2004, 72 convertible Series I, II, and IIa note holders elected to convert $4,531,200 of notes into 1,649,550 shares of common stock

On February 11, 2005, the Companys S-1 registration for the issuance of 1,500,000 new common shares was declared effective. On February 16, 2005 the Companys Initial Public Offering (IPO) was
closed and the Company received gross proceeds of $15,693,000 and incurred underwriting discounts, expenses and commissions of $1,681,875 and offering expenses payable by us of $655,500, resulting in net proceeds of $13,622,500.

On March 10, 2005, the underwriter exercised its option for the over-allotment and the Company issued 225,000 common shares for proceeds to the
Company of $2,030,625.

At December 31, 2005, the convertible notes payable have been converted into common stock except $30,000 for
which holders elected to be repaid. All common stock to be issued resulting from the conversion has been issued.

During the year ended
December 31, 2005, nine convertible preferred shareholders elected to convert 23,250 of their preferred shares into 2,325,000 shares of common stock. In addition, six stock option holders exercised options to purchase 123,466 shares of common
stock.

In December 2005, a warrant holder exercised 933,330 warrants in exchange for 848,482 shares of common stock.

In March 2006, a warrant holder exercised 100,000 warrants in exchange for 89,116 shares of common stock.

Stock Option Transactions

The Company has the
ability to issue stock options to both employees and non-employees under no formal stock option plans. It is managements intent to grant all options at exercise prices not less than 85% of the fair value of the Companys common stock, as
the Board of Directors determines on the date of grant. Options typically expire ten years from the date of grant. During the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) through March 31, 2006, the Company had granted options to both employees
and non-employee consultants. The Company accounts for stock option transactions in accordance with SFAS 123R as discussed in Note 5.

Stock option granted for 2006:



|                          |  |                 |  |                |       |                      |   |                                       |  |                          |  |   
|------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | -------------- | ----- | -------------------- | - | ------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | --
|Stock Option Transactions |  | Options Granted |  | Exercise Price |       | Estimated Fair Value |   | Weighted AverageExpected Life (years) |  | ApproximateVolatility(%)
|February 2006 (a)         |  | 51,000          |  | $              | 10.00 |                      | $ | 239,209                               |  | 5                        |  | 76
|March 2006 (b)            |  | 250             |  | $              | 10.00 |                      |   | 1,045                                 |  | 5                        |  | 76
|                          |  |                 |  |                |       |                      |   |                                       |  |                          |  |   
|Total -2006               |  | 51,250          |  |                |       |                      |   | 240,254                               |  |                          |  |   
|                          |  |                 |  |                |       |                      |   |                                       |  |                          |  |   

---

| | All options were granted from the 2004 Stock Plan (defined below). The fair value was estimated using a Black-Scholes Model with an expected dividend yield of zero.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(a) | All options were issued for the past services and therefore expensed on the date of grant.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | All options were issued for future services and will be expensed over the life of the options.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



24



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



Stock Option transactions for 2005 and prior years:

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued 550,500 options with an exercise price of $10.00 to employees and directors, from the
2004 Stock Plan. In addition, six stock option holders executed their options to purchase 124,500 shares of common stock. Of the total 124,500 stock options exercised, 20,000 stock options were exercised cashless.

In July 2004, the Company established the Cardiovascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan (the 2004 Stock Plan) permitting the awards of
(a) incentive stock options within the meaning of section 422 of the Code, (b) non-qualified stock options, (c) stock appreciation rights, and (c) restricted stock to directors, officers, employees and consultants. The Company
reserved 5,000,000 shares for the 2004 Stock Plan and limited the maximum number of shares to be granted to any one individual in one year to 500,000.

On March 1, 2004, the Company granted 25,000 options to non-employees. The Company estimated the fair value of the options granted to be $21,385 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. All options were
issued for past services and therefore expensed on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option pricing model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of .50 years, risk free rate of interest of 1.02 percent, volatility of 76 percent and an
expected dividend yield of zero.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, no options were granted to employees. However, during the
year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 40,000 options to employees. The Company estimated the fair value of the options granted to be $57,792 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. All options were issued for past services and
therefore expensed on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option pricing model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of .25 years, risk free rate of interest of 1.03 to 1.50 percent, volatility of 76 percent and an expected dividend yield of
zero.

During the year ended December 31, 2002, no options were issued to non-employees. On September 1, 2003 the Company granted
90,000 options to non-employees. The Company estimated the fair value of the options granted to be $47,120 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. All options were issued for past services and therefore expensed on the date of grant. The
Black-Scholes option pricing model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of .75 years, risk free rate of interest of 1.39 percent, volatility of 76 percent and an expected dividend yield of zero.

The Company has the ability to issue stock options to both employees and non-employees under no formal stock option plans. It is managements intent
to grant all options at exercise prices not less than 85% of the fair value of the Companys common stock, as the Board of Directors, determines on the date of grant. Options typically expire ten years from the date of grant and generally vest
immediately. During the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) through March 31, 2006, the Company had granted options to both employees and non-employee consultants.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



Except as noted above, no other compensation expense has been recognized in connection with grants of
employee and non-employee stock options. Stock option activity for the years ended December 31,2004 and 2005 and for the three month period ended March 31, 2006 is as follows:



|                                 |  |           |  |                |             |        |           |                |   |             |  |                |  |   |            
|-------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | -------------- | ----------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | - | ----------- |  | -------------- |  | - | -----------
|                                 |  | Employees |  | Non-Employees  |             | Total 
|                                 |  | Shares    |  | Exercise Price |             | Shares |           | Exercise Price |   | Shares      |  | Exercise Price
|Outstanding at December 31, 2004 |  | 1,040,000 |  | $              | 0.30-$10.00 |        | 1,751,000 |                | $ | 0.30-$4.00  |  | 2,755,000      |  | $ | 0.30-$10.00
|Granted                          |  | 150,500   |  | $              | 10.00       |        | 400,000   |                | $ | 10.00       |  | 550,500        |  | $ | 10.00      
|Exercised                        |  |          |  | $              |            |        | 124,500   |                | $ |            |  | 124,500        |  | $ | 0.30-$2.00 
|Forfeitures                      |  | 20,000    |  | $              | 10.00       |        |          |                | $ |            |  | 20,000         |  | $ | 10.00      
|Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |  | 1,170,500 |  | $              | 0.30-$10.00 |        | 1,990,500 |                | $ | 0.30-$10.00 |  | 3,161,000      |  | $ | 0.30-$10.00
|Granted                          |  | 1,250     |  | $              | 10.00       |        | 50,000    |                | $ | 10.00       |  | 51,250         |  | $ | 10.00      
|Exercised                        |  |          |  | $              |            |        |          |                | $ |            |  |               |  | $ |           
|Outstanding at March 31, 2006    |  | 1,171,750 |  | $              | 0.30-$10.00 |        | 2,040,500 |                | $ | 0.30-$10.00 |  | 3,212,250      |  | $ | 0.30-$10.00

Weighted average exercise price of options granted and exercisable and the weighted average
remaining contractual life for options outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 was as follows:



|                               |  |                 |  |                              |      |                                               |      |                |   |          
|------------------------------ |  | --------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ---- | --------------------------------------------- | ---- | -------------- | - | ---------
|                               |  | Number ofShares |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice |      | WeightedAverageRemainingContractualLife Years |      | IntrinsicValue
|As of December 31, 2005        |  |                 |  |                              |      |                                               |      |                |   |          
|EmployeesOutstanding          |  | 1,170,500       |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.56 |                | $ | 1,989,850
|EmployeesExpected to Vest     |  | 104,614         |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.56 |                | $ | 177,844  
|EmployeesExercisable          |  | 1,065,886       |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.02 |                | $ | 1,812,006
|                               |  |                 |  |                             
|Non-EmployeesOutstanding      |  | 1,990,500       |  | $                            | 2.50 |                                               | 5.26 |                | $ | 4,976,250
|Non-EmployeesExpected to Vest |  | 0               |  |                              | 0    |                                               | 0    |                |   | 0        
|Non EmployeesExercisable      |  | 1,990,500       |  | $                            | 2.50 |                                               | 5.26 |                | $ | 4,976,250
|                               |  |                 |  |                             
|As of March 31, 2006           |  |                 |  |                              |      |                                               |      |                |   |          
|EmployeesOutstanding          |  | 1,171,750       |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.56 |                | $ | 1,991,975
|EmployeesExpected to Vest     |  | 155,737         |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.56 |                | $ | 264,756  
|EmployeesExercisable          |  | 1,016,011       |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.29 |                | $ | 1,727,219
|                               |  |                 |  |                             
|Non-EmployeesOutstanding      |  | 2,040,500       |  | $                            | 2.58 |                                               | 5.38 |                | $ | 5,264,490
|Non-EmployeesExpected to Vest |  |                |  |                              |     |                                               |     |                |   |         
|Non EmployeesExercisable      |  | 2,040,500       |  | $                            | 2.58 |                                               | 5.38 |                | $ | 5,264,490

Options DerivativeRESTATED

Of the 2,040,500 non-employee options issued in prior periods, 1,590,500 were issued to non-employees for services and have been reclassified as the
Option Derivatives. However, 450,000 of non-employee options were issued to directors under the 2004 Stock Plan. In accordance with FAS 123(R), the options issued to directors, for services provided to the Company in each individual capacity as a
director, are accounted for as options issued to employees and hence, were not reclassified as the Option Derivatives. See Note 2Restatements and Note 12Reclassification of Equity Transactions.

Warrants

The Companys accounting policy
for the issuance of warrants is discussed in Note 4. Warrants have only been issued to outside parties and have never been issued to employees.

In December 2000, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 933,330 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share to an individual in connection with assisting in closing a private placement. The



26



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



fair value of the warrant was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the value of $115,475 was recorded as a reduction of the net proceeds
received in the private placement. The Black-Scholes option pricing model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of 3.5 years, risk free rate of interest of 5.02 percent, zero volatility and an expected dividend yield of zero. The warrants fully
vested in December 2001 expire in December 2005. However, prior to the expiration date in December 2005 the holder of the warrants elected to exercise 933,330 warrants in exchange for 848,482 shares of common stock. The exercise of these warrants
was cashless.

In January 2001, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per
share to an individual in connection with consulting services rendered. The warrant was deemed to have no value as determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of
3.5 years, risk free rate of interest of 4.89 percent, zero volatility and an expected dividend yield of zero. The warrant was fully vested on the date of grant and was exercised in March 2006.

In June 2003, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share to an individual in
connection with consulting services rendered. The fair value of the warrant was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the value of $119,744 was recorded as a compensation expense in the Statement of Operations. The Black-Scholes
option pricing model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of 3.5 years, risk free rate of interest of 0.94 percent, volatility of 76 percent and an expected dividend yield of zero. The warrant fully vested on the date of grant and expires in
June 2013.

On February 16, 2005, the company sold a warrant for 75,000 shares of common stock at 125% of the IPO price for $75.00
to the underwriter pursuant to the underwriting agreement. The warrants have a term of four years commencing on the effective date of the IPO, February 11, 2005.

Warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the three month period ended March 31, 2006 (unaudited) is as follows:



|                                          |  |                     |   |  |                              |      
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | - |  | ---------------------------- | -----
|                                          |  | WarrantsOutstanding |   |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice
|Outstanding at December 31, 2004          |  | 1,233,330           |   |  | $                            | 0.69 
|Granted                                   |  |                    |   |  |                              |     
|Sold                                      |  | 75,000              |   |  |                              | 12.50
|Exercised                                 |  | (933,330            | ) |  |                              | 0.40 
|Forfeited                                 |  |                    |   |  |                              |     
|                                          |  |                     |   |  |                              |      
|Outstanding at December 31, 2005          |  | 375,000             |   |  | $                            | 3.78 
|Granted                                   |  |                    |   |  |                              |     
|Issued                                    |  | 705,882             |   |  |                              | 8.50 
|Exercised                                 |  | (100,000            | ) |  |                              | 0.69 
|Forfeited                                 |  |                    |   |  |                              |     
|                                          |  |                     |   |  |                              |      
|Outstanding at March 31, 2006             |  | 980,882             |   |  | $                            | 7.48 
|                                          |  |                     |   |  |                              |      
|Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2004 |  | 1,233,330           |   |  | $                            | 0.69 
|                                          |  |                     |   |  |                              |      
|Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2005 |  | 375,000             |   |  | $                            | 3.78 
|                                          |  |                     |   |  |                              |      
|Warrants exercisable at March 31, 2006    |  | 980,882             |   |  | $                            | 7.48 
|                                          |  |                     |   |  |                              |      



27



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding at March 31, 2006:



|                         |  |                     |  |                                     |  |                              |       |                     |         |                              |   |      
|------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ----- | ------------------- | ------- | ---------------------------- | - | -----
|Range of Exercise Prices |  | WarrantsOutstanding |  | WeightedAverageRemainingLife(Years) |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice |       | WarrantsExercisable |         | WeightedAverageExercisePrice
|2.00                     |  | 200,000             |  | 7.25                                |  |                              | 2.00  |                     | 200,000 |                              |   | 2.00 
|8.50                     |  | 705,882             |  | 2.97                                |  |                              | 8.50  |                     | 705,882 |                              |   | 8.50 
|$12.50                   |  | 75,000              |  | 2.92                                |  | $                            | 12.50 |                     | 75,000  |                              | $ | 12.50
|                         |  |                     |  |                                     |  |                              |       |                     |         |                              |   |      
|                         |  | 980,882             |  |                                     |  |                              |       |                     | 980,882 |                              |   |      
|                         |  |                     |  |                                     |  |                              |       |                     |         |                              |   |      

Warrant DerivativeRESTATEMENT

Of the 980,882 warrants issued in prior periods, 275,000 warrants were reclassified as Warrant Derivative and 705,882 were previously classified as
Warrant Derivative as part of the convertible note. See Note 2Restatement and Note 10Convertible Notes Payable and Note 12- Reclassification of Equity Transactions.

Authorized Shares

At the Companys Annual Meeting on May 23, 2005, the shareholders
approved to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 400,000,000 shares. It also authorized the board of directors at its discretion to implement a two-for-one (2:1) stock split in
the Common Stock of the Company, if at all, prior to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

12. RECLASSIFICATION OF EQUITY TRANSACTIONS
(RESTATED)

As discussed in Note 11Stockholders Equity of the notes to the financial statements, this restatement is to
correct an error in identifying certain financial instruments as derivatives in the application of certain accounting principles related to the issuance of the Companys convertible note financing and the impact of such accounting principles on
previously issued and vested non-employee stock option and warrant transactions in prior periods. The previously recorded transactions were properly treated as equity transactions at the time of their respective issuances. Upon the sale of the
Companys convertible notes on March 20, 2006, more recent accounting practices, as more fully set forth below, require the previously issued and vested non-employee options and warrants to be reclassified as derivative liabilities. The
reclassification of previously issued and vested options and warrants as derivative instruments requires the Companys financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2006 to be restated.

The convertible note agreements entered into on March 20, 2006 and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on March 22, 2006 contain variable share settlement
provisions. These provisions require the Company to reclassify, at fair value, previously issued and vested options and warrants from additional paid in capital to derivative liability accounts on the balance sheet in accordance with
EITF 00-19 Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in a Companys Own Stock. The reason for this reclassification is the possibility that the Company may not have enough authorized
unissued common stock to meet all of its commitments in the delivery of the Companys common stock to honor both the contracts related to the convertible notes and the previously issued and vested option and warrant contracts. In order to be in
the situation of not having enough unissued shares to deliver to the option and warrant holders, the fair market value of the common stock of the Company would have to be lower than all of the exercise prices of all the option and warrant contracts.
In such case, an option or warrant holder would have to exercise his or her options or warrants at a price that would require him or her to pay more than the fair market value of the common stock on the open market. Nonetheless, according to EITF
00-19 the previously recorded transactions must be reclassified from equity to liability. In addition, further analysis indicates the previously issued and vested options and warrants identified as derivative instruments require separate valuation
under FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of
EITF 00-19, the Company has analyzed all instruments previously recorded as permanent equity under EITF 00-19, which is described in detail in Note 11Stockholders Equity.

As of March 20, 2006, the closing date of the convertible note financing, the Company reclassified 1,590,500 options granted to non-employees to an
Option Derivative liability at the fair value of the relevant instruments in the amount of approximately $10,583,305, which was recorded based upon fair values computed using the Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield
of 0%, (2) the range of the expected volatility of 71.18% to 84.42%, (3) the range of the risk-free interest rate of 4.61% to 4.62% and (4) the range of the expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual instrument.

As of March 20, 2006, the closing date of the convertible note financing, the Company reclassified 275,000 warrants granted to non-employees to a Warrant
Derivative liability at the fair value of the relevant instruments in the amount of approximately $1,355,750, which was recorded based upon fair values computed using the Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%,
(2) the range expected volatility of 71.18% to 84.42%, (3) the range risk-free interest rate of 4.61% to 4.62% and (4) the range expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual instrument.

At March 31, 2006, in accordance with the requirements of FAS 133, the fair value of each instrument was again computed under the Black-Scholes Model
with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) the range of the expected volatility of 71.44% to 84.04%, (3) the range of the risk-free interest rate of 4.82% to 4.83% and (4) the range of the expected life and exercise prices
consistent with each individual instrument resulting in an increase to the individual derivates and additional expense for Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives of $1,032,420 for the Option Derivative and $149,250 for the Warrant
Derivative for a total of $1,181,670.

At March 31, 2006, the total expense for the Adjustment to Fair Value of
DerivativesWarrant and Option Derivatives was $1,181,670 in accordance with the requirements of FAS 133.

13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998
(inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Daniel C. Montano, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, consulting fees in the amount of $0, $0, $0 and $200,000, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31,
2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Daniel C. Montano, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, for employment services in the amount of $80,769, $129,231 and $1,465,379 respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited), and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31,
2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Vizier Management Company, Inc. controlled by Daniel C. Montano, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, consulting fees in the amount of $0, $0 and $116,000, respectively.

Cardio paid commissions to GHL Financial Services Ltd. (GHL), in which a director is a principal and owns 6.6% of the Company, for the
overseas sale of the Companys convertible notes payable and Preferred Stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006
(unaudited), Cardio paid GHL $5,000, $5,000, and $2,190,255, respectively.

Cardio paid consulting fees to Dr. Thomas Stegmann M.D.,
the Companys co-founder, to assist in the development process of its products. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 30, 2006
(unaudited), Cardio paid Dr. Stegmann $25,250, $125,000 and $1,114,300, respectively.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



Cardio paid C.K. Capital International and C&K Capital Corporation, controlled by Alexander G.
Montano, son of Daniel C. Montano, for consulting services. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited), consulting fees
Cardio incurred were $5,000,$1,208,000 and $1,753,240, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Dr. Wolfgang Priemer, the Companys co-founder, to assist in the development process of its products. Cardio paid
Dr. Priemer $5,000, $15,000 and $216,555, respectively.

On March 15, 2006 the Company entered into a Standard Lease Guaranty
(the Lease Guaranty) of the Standard Industrial Net Lease between Canta Rana Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership and Phage (the Lease Agreement). Pursuant to the Lease Guaranty, the Company guarantees full
performance of all of Phages obligations under the Lease Agreement. (See note 13).

In addition, in August 2004, the Company
guaranteed Phages obligations under a non-cancelable operating lease.

14. INCOME TAXES

Significant components of the provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 were as follows:



|                           |  |          |   |      |   |  
|-------------------------- |  | -------- | - | ---- | - | -
|                           |  | March 31
|                           |  | 2005     |   | 2006
|Current                    |  |          |   |      |   |  
|Federal                    |  | $        |  |      | $ | 
|State                      |  |          |  |      |   | 
|Deferred                   |  |          |   |      |   |  
|Federal                    |  |          |  |      |   | 
|State                      |  |          |  |      |   | 
|                           |  |          |   |      |   |  
|Provision for income taxes |  | $        |  |      | $ | 
|                           |  |          |   |      |   |  

The Company had a net operating loss carry forwards for the federal and state income tax purposes
of approximately $30,893,587 and $30,887,150, respectively, which expire through 2008 to 2018. The utilization of net operating loss carry forwards may be limited due to the ownership change under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code
Section 382 and similar state provisions. The Company also has a federal research and development credit carryforward of $172,834.

The net operating loss carry-forwards are the only significant deferred income tax assets of the Company. They have been offset by a valuation allowance since management does not believe the recoverability of this deferred tax assets during
the next fiscal year is more likely than not. Accordingly, a deferred income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, has not been recognized in these financial statements.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

In April 2004, the Company entered into a non-cancelable operating lease agreement for office
space that requires monthly payments of $5,882 and expires in October 2005. On May 2004, the Company gave a deposit of $5,900. The Company vacated this facility in October 2005.

On August 2004, the Company guaranteed Phages obligations under a non-cancelable operating lease for laboratory and office space at University of
California Irvine Research Center. The lease is for 11,091 rentable square feet for the period March 1, 2004 through August 31, 2006, and provides for a monthly rent of approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses. During
2004 and 2005, the Company sub-leased space from Phage for approximately $2,800 per month as part of the agreement for administrative services.

In November 2005, the Company entered into a five year operating lease for its corporate headquarters commencing on March 1, 2006. The lease provides for a renewal option for an additional five years. The lease provides for increases
in annual rental payments of approximately 3%. Also, the agreement requires the Company to pay its share of certain common operating costs that are to be assessed annually. For the three months ending March 31, 2005 and 2006, rent expense
totaled $23,498 and $55,625 respectively.

The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under the lease
agreement:



|           |  |        |          
|---------- |  | ------ | ---------
|Year       |  | Amount
|2006       |  | $      | 152,000  
|2007       |  |        | 208,000  
|2008       |  |        | 214,000  
|2009       |  |        | 221,000  
|2010       |  |        | 227,000  
|thereafter |  |        | 38,000   
|           |  |        |          
|Total      |  | $      | 1,060,000
|           |  |        |          

Total minimum lease payments do not include rental income from a sub-lease of part of its office
space to related parties.

Phage Lease Guaranty

The Company entered into a Standard Lease Guaranty (the Lease Guaranty) dated March 15, 2006 of the Standard Industrial Net Lease dated March 15, 2006, between Canta Rana Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership
and Phage Biotechnology Corporation (Phage), a Delaware corporation (the Lease Agreement). Pursuant to the Lease Guaranty, the Company guarantees full performance of all of Phages obligations under the Lease Agreement.

In exchange for the Companys guarantee of the Lease Agreement, Phage entered
into an Indemnity and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006. Phage will pay the Company certain fees payable on the first day of each calendar month that will be the sum of the following amounts (collectively, Guaranty
Fees): (a) one-tenth (1/10th) of one percent (1%) of the remaining aggregate amount of the
Minimum Monthly Rent due under the Lease Agreement from the period from May 1, 2006 to the Expiration Date of the Lease Agreement;



30



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



and (b) one-tenth (1/10th) of one percent (1%) of the remaining aggregate amount of Additional Rent due under the Lease Agreement following the payment of Additional Rent. Any amount of Guaranty Fees not paid by Phage on the first calendar day of
each month shall accrue interest at the lesser of twelve percent (12%) per annum or the maximum rate allowable by law until paid.

For
the three month period ended March 31, 2006 Cardio earned $948 towards the Guaranty Fees from Phage biotechnology Corp.

Phage is an affiliated private biotechnology company that manufactures recombinant protein drugs
for the Company and is the Companys sole supplier of Cardio Vascu-Grow.

If Phage defaults on payment of the Minimum Monthly Rent or the Additional Rent, which monthly
payments aggregate approximately $20,000, the Company is obligated pursuant to the Lease Guaranty to pay to the lessor the rents in default. The Companys maximum contingent liability is approximately $1,837,000 as of March 31, 2006 and
will decrease by approximately $20,000 per month as Minimum Monthly Rent and the Additional Rent are paid by Phage.

Phage has indemnified
the Company for any amounts required to be paid by the Company pursuant to the Lease Guaranty in the Indemnity and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006.

The lease guarantee is irrevocably released when Phage provides to Canta Rana Ranch, L.P. a bank statement showing $5,000,000 in cash in the bank.

In addition, in August 2004, the Company guaranteed Phages obligations under a non-cancelable operating lease.

Employment Agreements

In April 2000, the Company
entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Scientific Officer, effective May 1, 2000. Under the terms of employment agreement, the Company paid a monthly salary of $3,000. Also, Cardio provided a vehicle allowance equal to $500 per
month. The agreement was for three years and expired on April 15, 2003.

In July 2004, the Company entered into an employment
agreement with a non-executive employee, effective August 1, 2004, under the terms of which Cardio will pay a monthly salary of $10,000. The agreement is for three years and expires July 31, 2007.

Consulting Agreements

The Company entered into
numerous consulting agreements whereby the consultants assisted the Company in the development process, regulatory affairs and financial management. For the periods ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited), 2006 (unaudited) and the period from
March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited), consulting fees related to the various agreements were $128,915, $205,999 and $1,531,118 respectively.

In addition to the consulting fees, the Company issued 2,715,000 non-employee stock options, with an exercise price range of $0.30$4.00 per share. The options vested immediately and have a contract life of



31



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006

10 years. The Company also issued 300,000 warrants with an exercise price range of $0.80-$2.00 per share. The warrants are exercisable immediately and
have a contract life of 10 years.

List of consulting agreement:



|           |  |                    |  |                         |  |           |  |         
|---------- |  | ------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | --------- |  | --------
|ItemNumber |  | Contract           |  | Agreement Name          |  | Start     |  | End Date
|1          |  | E&G Consulting     |  | Regulatory Affairs      |  | 1-Jun-05  |  | 6-Dec-06
|2          |  | Judith Pelton      |  | Corporate Secretary     |  | 20-Mar-98 |  | 1-Jan-06
|3          |  | Mickael Flaa       |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 1-Jun-03  |  | ongoing 
|4          |  | Amy Montano        |  | Investor Relations      |  | 20-Mar-98 |  | ongoing 
|5          |  | Investor Awareness |  | Public Relations        |  | 1-Nov-04  |  | 1-Jun-06

Service Agreements

The Company has entered the service agreements set forth on the following table:

The service fees
for the obligations below were determined through a process of competitive bids and/or negotiation. Our major outstanding contractual obligations are summarized below:





|           |  |                                                                              |  |                                                                                        |  |           |  |                                        
|---------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|ItemNumber |  | Contract                                                                     |  | Agreement Name                                                                         |  | Start     |  | End Date                               
|1          |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                          |  | Technical Services Agreement                                                           |  | 1-Mar-00  |  | 1-Mar-20                               
|2          |  | Cardio Phage International (CPI)                                           |  | Distribution agreement                                                                 |  | 16-Aug-04 |  | 16-Aug-13                              
|3          |  | Korea Bio-Development Corporation                                            |  | Manufacturing and distribution agreement                                               |  | 15-Dec-00 |  | 15-Dec-99                              
|4          |  | Hesperion, Inc. (TouchStone,formerly ClinicalCardioVascular Research, LLC) |  | Clinical development ofinvestigational drugs and devicesfor cardiovascular indications |  | 24-Oct-01 |  | ongoing                                
|5          |  | Dr. Thomas Stegmann                                                          |  | Royalty agreement                                                                      |  | 16-Aug-04 |  | 31-Dec-13                              
|6          |  | Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc.                                  |  | Product development                                                                    |  | 1-Jun-04  |  | Upondelivery ofand paymentfor catheters
|7          |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                          |  | Lease Guarantee Irvine                                                                 |  | 1-Sep-04  |  | 31-Aug-06                              
|8          |  | JDM Consulting                                                               |  | Marketing and Mailing                                                                  |  | 11-Mar-06 |  | 1-Oct-06                               
|9          |  | bioRASI, LLC                                                                 |  | CRO agreement                                                                          |  | 8-Aug-05  |  | Completionof clinicaltrial             
|10         |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                          |  | Lease Guarantee - San Diego                                                            |  | 15-Mar-06 |  | 15-Aug-13                              
|11         |  | Promethean                                                                   |  | Convertible Notes                                                                      |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | 19-Mar-09                              
|12         |  | Daniel C. Montano                                                            |  | Guarantee agreement                                                                    |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | first date ofgeneratingrevenue         
|13         |  | Daniel C. Montano                                                            |  | Guarantee reimbursement agreement                                                      |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | first date ofgeneratingrevenue         

---

|1) | The Company agreed to jointly own and license from one another the right to use certain patents including the patents related to FGF-1. As part of that agreement, at our election,
the Company is obligated to either (i) pay to Phage ten percent of its net sales or drugs manufactured by Phage or (ii) pay to Phage a six percent royalty based on drugs which Phage does not manufacture.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | CPI will act as distributor for the products of both Phage and the Company in locations throughout the world other than United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, China, and the Republic
of Korea. CPI is obligated to pay an amount equal to 50% of CPIs gross revenue from sales of the Companys products less CPIs direct and indirect costs.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3) | As part of this agreement, KBDC arranged the purchase of 8,750,000 shares of the Companys common stock for $3,602,000 by Cardio Korea, Ltd. KBDC agreed to fund all of the
regulatory approval process in Korea for any of the Companys products. In addition, KBDC agreed to pay the Company a royalty of ten percent net revenue from sales in its Asian territories.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4) | Hesperion will assist the Company with the FDA approval process for its drug candidates.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5) | The Companys royalty agreement with Dr. Stegmann will provide him with a one percent royalty on net revenue from the sale of the Companys drug candidates, if any,
measured quarterly and payable 90 days after quarter end.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|6) | Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc. will design, develop, and fabricate two different prototype catheter products that will facilitate the administration of CVBT-141A by
catheter procedures.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|7) | This lease is for 11,091 rentable square feet and provides for a monthly rent of approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses. This lease and the Companys
guarantee expired in September 2006.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|8) | This agreement is for implementing a wide range of marketing and shareholder awareness programs.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|9) | This agreement is for the purpose of assisting in the Companys clinical trials in Russia. bioRASI is the strategic initiative of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and is
responsible for commercializing RAS bio-sciences and clinical resources. bioRASI is a contract research organization (CRO) providing services for its collaborative R&D clients in the areas of drug development, biologicals, and medical
devices.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|10) | This agreement is for a new manufacturing facility in San Diego, CA. The lease provides for Minimum Monthly Rent and Additional Rent for shared costs, which aggregate approximately
$20,000 per month.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|11) | The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors to place $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of the
Companys common stock. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time at $12 per share (the Fixed Conversion Price). In addition, the notes are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of
the average of the preceding five days weighted average trading price, if the result is lower than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into the Companys common stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no
more than 10% of the original $20,000,000 note balance per calendar month. The notes mature in March 2009, and bear a resetting floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 7%. The warrants may be exercised anytime up to March 2009. The warrant
exercise price is $8.50 per share. Substantially all of the Companys assets secure the notes.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|12) | Daniel C. Montano, Chairman, Co-President and CEO of the Company, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all of the Companys obligations resulting
from the sale on March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the first date on which the Company receives revenue from the sale of drugs after such drug has been approved by the FDA,
provided that on such date the Company is not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will
terminate upon the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into the Companys common stock.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|13) | After the Companys obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano was required to make any
payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of the Companys obligations, the Company will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C.
Montano to the date reimbursed by the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               |  |                                |         |                                                                              |   |           |  |   |          
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                               |  | For the Quarter EndedMarch 31, |         | For the Period from March 11, 1998 (Inception) to March 31, 2006 (Unaudited)
|                                               |  | 2005                           |         | 2006                                                                         |  
|Service Fees Paid for Main Contracts:          |  |                                |         |                                                                              |   |           |  |   |          
|Hesperion (formerly TouchStone Research, Inc.) |  | $                              | 249,615 |                                                                              | $ | 367,591   |  | $ | 3,350,886
|bioRASI                                        |  |                                |        |                                                                              |   | 57,021    |  |   | 237,039  
|Catheter and Disposables Technologies          |  |                                | 21,894  |                                                                              |   | 3,325     |  |   | 52,617   
|BS Biology                                     |  |                                |        |                                                                              |   |          |  |   | 370,100  
|Da Vinci Biomedical Research Products, Inc.    |  |                                |        |                                                                              |   |          |  |   | 431,698  
|JDM Consulting                                 |  |                                |        |                                                                              |   | 970,000   |  |   | 2,103,000
|                                               |  |                                |         |                                                                              |   |           |  |   |          
|Total                                          |  | $                              | 271,509 |                                                                              | $ | 1,397,937 |  | $ | 6,545,340
|                                               |  |                                |         |                                                                              |   |           |  |   |          

Securities Act Compliance

Commencing in 2001 and ending in August 2004, the Company sold two series of convertible notes to investors who, with a few exceptions, were not residents
or citizens of the United States. The Company made these sales in reliance on the fact that the sales occurred outside the United States and were thus not subject



32



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



to the jurisdiction of the Securities Act or were made to accredited investors pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by the Securities Act. The
Companys counsel has advised that the availability of those exemptions cannot be determined with legal certainty and that it is possible that the sale of some of the series of convertible notes may have violated the registration requirements
of the Securities Act. As to most of those sales, a right of rescission may exist on which the statute of limitation has not run. For those noteholders that elected to convert to common stock and who have not sold that stock, the Company may have a
contingent liability arising from the original purchase of the convertible notes that such noteholders converted. That liability would extend for up to three years after the date of the sale of the applicable convertible note that was converted to
common stock. The notes were converted at either $2.00 per share or $4.00 per share. Accordingly, the market price of the common stock would likely have to decrease below its current level before a former noteholder had a significant economic reason
to pursue any potential rescission rights. All of the notes have been either converted into common stock or repaid in full.

The Company is
unable to accurately estimate the likelihood or amount of potential liability that, if any, may arise for this contingency.

Government Regulation

Regulation by government authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture
and marketing of products such as Cardio Vascu-Grow and in our ongoing research and product development activities. Cardio Vascu-Grow will require regulatory approval by government agencies prior to commercialization. In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous preclinical studies and clinical
trials and other approval procedures of the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in foreign countries. Various federal and state statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage and record keeping
related to such products and their marketing. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent substantial compliance with appropriate federal and state statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial
resources.

Preclinical studies are generally conducted in laboratory animals to evaluate the potential safety and the efficacy of a
product. Drug developers submit the results of preclinical studies to the FDA as a part of an investigational new drug application which must be approved before clinical trials in humans may begin. Typically, clinical evaluation involves a time
consuming and costly three-phase process.



|          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|--------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Phase I   |  | Clinical trials are conducted with a small number of subjects to determine the early safety profile, maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of the product in human
volunteers.                                        
|          | 
|Phase II  |  | Clinical trials are conducted with groups of patients afflicted with a specific disease in order to determine preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages and expanded evidence of
safety.                                        
|          | 
|Phase III |  | Large scale, multi-center, comparative trials are conducted with patients afflicted with a target disease in order to provide enough data to demonstrate with substantial evidence the efficacy
and safety the FDA requires.

The Companys current FDA approved trials in heart patients combine the safety elements of a
Phase I trial with the dosage elements of a Phase II clinical trial, including measuring clinical outcomes at different dosages of the drug in the target patient population, which is no-option heart patients. Upon completion of our Phase I trial,
the Company will notify the FDA of the safety results obtained from this study and plans to commence its Phase II trials in a larger population of no-option heart patients.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

MARCH 31, 2006



The company also has received notification from the FDA that it may proceed in clinical testing of
Cardio Vascu-Grow in a second medical indication,
diabetic wound healing. A Phase I study has been authorized which will test the safety of Cardio Vascu-Grow after topical administration to diabetic ulcers and venous stasis wounds.

The FDA closely monitors the progress of clinical trials that are conducted in the United States and may, at its discretion, reevaluate, alter, suspend or terminate the testing based upon the data accumulated to that point and the
FDAs assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the patient. This is no guaranty that the FDA will not alter, suspend or terminate the testing.

Litigation

The Company may become involved in various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of
its business. The Company is not involved in any litigation at this time and is unaware of any claims that may be filed against it.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This
Form 10-Q, including but not limited to this section, may contain forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may
cause our or our industrys actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. These risks and other factors include those listed under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. We believe that the section entitled Risk Factors includes all material risks that could harm our business. In
some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates,
predicts, intends, potential, continue or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

We believe it is important to communicate our future expectations to our investors. However, there may be events in the future that
we are not able to accurately predict or control and that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. Stockholders are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed as a result of various factors, including those factors described in the Risk Factors section of this Form 10-Q. Stockholders should not place undue
reliance on our forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

You should read the following
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing in Item 1. of this Form 10-Q. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis
or set forth elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the Risk
Factors set forth below in this section of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the
following discussion and analysis.

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing new drugs for the treatment of
cardiovascular diseases where the growth of new blood vessels can improve the outcome for patients with these diseases. The active ingredient in our drug candidates, Cardio Vascu-Grow, is designed to facilitate the growth of new blood vessels in the heart and other
tissues and organs with an impaired vascular system.

Dr. Stegmann, a founder
of the company, tested a protein drug candidate with the active ingredient that we now call Cardio Vascu-Grow in two separate German clinical trials dating back to 1995. A total of 40 patients were treated with Cardio Vascu-Grow, and, in both trials, the drug candidate facilitated the growth of new blood
vessels in the heart. We were established in 1998, as a Delaware corporation, to commercialize the results of the clinical research in cardiovascular disease treatment for no-option heart patients that Dr. Thomas Stegmann performed in the
mid-1990s. We entered into an agreement with Dr. Stegmann, dated March 11, 1998 which is superseded by an agreement dated August 16, 2004, whereby Dr. Stegmann granted to us a non-revocable exclusive perpetual right to use,
modify, add to, practice and sell the results of Dr. Stegmanns German clinical trials. Dr. Stegmann will receive a one percent royalty on all sales of Cardio Vascu-Grow through December 31, 2013. The grant of rights is perpetual and therefore
cannot be terminated by Dr. Stegmann. We have made no royalty payments under this Agreement.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

We have never generated revenues. We expect to
incur substantial and increasing losses for at least the next several years. We do not expect to generate revenues until the FDA approves one of our drug candidates and we begin marketing it. We expect to continue to spend significant amounts on the
development of our drug candidates. We expect to incur significant commercialization costs when we recruit a domestic sales force. We also plan to continue to invest in research and development for additional applications of Cardio
Vascu-Grow and to develop new drug
delivery technologies. Accordingly, we will need to generate significant revenues to achieve and then maintain profitability.

Most of our
expenditures to date have been for research and development activities and general and administrative expenses. We classify our research and development into two major classifications, pre-clinical and clinical. Preclinical activities include
product analysis and development, primarily animal efficacy and animal toxicity studies. Clinical activities include FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) submissions, the FDA trials, and the FDA approval process for commercialization. Research and
development expenses represent costs incurred for preclinical and clinical activities. We outsource our clinical trials and our manufacturing and development activities to third parties to maximize efficiency and minimize our internal overhead.
Manufacturing is outsourced to an affiliated entity. We expense our research and development costs as they are incurred.

These additional
expenses are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with clinical trials and the FDA review and approval process. As a result, these additional expenses could exceed our estimated amounts, possibly materially. We are uncertain as to what
we expect to incur in future research and development costs for our preclinical activities as these amounts are subject to the outcome of current preclinical activities, managements continuing assessment of the economics of each individual
research and development project and the internal competition for project funding.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related expenses and general corporate activities and through March 31, 2006 have focused primarily on the activities of administrative support, marketing,
intellectual property rights, corporate compliance and preparing us to be a public company. We anticipate that general and administrative expenses will increase as a result of the expected expansion of our operations, facilities and other activities
associated with the planned expansion of our business, together with the additional costs associated with operating as a public company. We will incur sales and marketing expenses as we build our sales force and marketing capabilities for Cardio
Vascu-Grow, subject to receiving
required regulatory approvals. We expect these expenses to be material.

Market Opportunity

According to the American Heart Association 2006 Update, blockage of coronary arteries resulting in
severe damage to the heart is the number one cause of death in the United States. The American Heart Association 2006 Update indicates that nearly 38% of all deaths in the United States were caused by cardiovascular disease, with over half of these
deaths due to coronary artery disease. We are now working with a team of experienced drug development scientists and business professionals to confirm the medical benefit of our drug candidate for No Option Heart Patients, with the active
ingredient, Cardio Vascu-Grow, in FDA
authorized Phase I clinical trials which we commenced in November 2003. Presently, it is anticipated that we will be responsible for the registration of Cardio Vascu-Grow for sale in the United States and eventually, if approved, we will also handle the
sale and distribution of Cardio Vascu-Grow in the rest of North America, Europe and Japan. In the remaining international marketplaces, if approved, we anticipate selling our drug through affiliated or unrelated regional distributors.

The market for wound healing includes diabetic, bedridden and elderly patients that suffer from wounds, open sores and diabetic ulcers. According to the
US Healthcare Finance Administration, approximately 2.5 to 3.0 million patients a year suffer from these maladies. Annual treatment costs in the United States alone are in the range of $5-7 Billion. Our Investigational New Drug Application
(IND) to the U.S. FDA has been allowed and the FDA has authorized us to commence a Phase I clinical trial in diabetic patients who have foot ulcers and/or open leg wounds.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) is a disease in
which the arteries of the leg become blocked, leading, in many cases, to intense pain and suffering for these patients. The active ingredient in the Companys drug candidates, Cardio Vascu-Grow, has proven to be a potent stimulator for growing new blood vessels in affected
areas of the legs of rabbits, thereby providing blood perfusion to the leg. In its most severe form, PVD can lead to extensive tissue loss and gangrene, which for many patients results in amputation of the limb. Though many therapies are being
developed to treat PVD, there are an increasing number of limb amputations in such patients, many of whom suffer from diabetes. According to the American Heart Associations 2006 report, there are 8 million Americans suffering from this
malady.

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States. It is reported by the American Heart Association that each year
about 700,000 people experience a new or recurrent stroke in the U.S. The cost to treat and care for the nearly 5.5 million stroke patients in the United States was nearly $57.9 Billion in 2006. We have completed stroke recovery studies in
animals, which indicate and confirm that our Stroke Recovery drug candidate could significantly reduce the volume of stroke in animals.

Scientific
Overview

Cardio Vascu-Grow, the active ingredient in our drug candidates, is a protein, and is a member of the fibroblast growth factor family. Fibroblast growth factor-1 or,
FGF-1, is a powerful stimulator of new blood vessel growth, a process referred to in the scientific community as angiogenesis. This is due to the fact that FGF-1 stimulates the growth and multiplication of the two main cell types of
blood vessels, smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells. Extensive work by us and others has shown that, when FGF-1 is injected into the hearts of animals with experimentally induced heart disease, new blood vessels grow in the injected areas.
Proteins such as Cardio Vascu-Grow represent a
novel way to circumvent clogged arteries in patients with heart disease.

The first clinical study was performed by our co-founder
Dr. Thomas Stegmann from 1995 to 1997 in Fulda, Germany. Cardio Vascu-Grow was injected directly into the wall of the heart of 20 patients with coronary artery disease. These patients were also receiving a coronary by-pass procedure on another affected artery. A control group of 20 patients
received by-pass surgery alone. The patients treated with Cardio Vascu-Grow showed a significant increase in localized blood vessel growth at the site of injection, and importantly, these vessels persisted when examined at a three year follow-up examination. The blood vessel growth was
determined to be statistically significant over controls at both three months (P-value less than 0.005) and three years (P-value less than 0.005) following injection of Cardio Vascu-Grow.

In the scientific and medical research communities, the term statistically significant means that a particular experimental test has a P-value of less than 0.05. P-values are calculated from experimental variations
typically seen in scientific or medical testing. Thus, if the blood vessel growth in the German clinical tests had reflected P-values of greater than 0.05, the growth would have been deemed to be statistically insignificant. As a tests P-value
decreases below 0.05, the more statistically significant the result is deemed to be in the scientific and medical research communities.

The amount of blood vessel growth in the heart muscle was determined by angiograms wherein a dye
was injected into the affected areas. New blood vessel growth was measured through digital photographic analysis of the dyed areas, a process referred to in the scientific research community as the mean gray value, or gray value, analysis. The gray
value measurements for the heart muscles injected with Cardio Vascu-Grow, and the control group which did not receive the injections, at three months after surgery and three years after surgery were as follows:



|              |  |                        |  |                     
|------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------
|              |  | 3 Months After Surgery |  | 3 YearsAfter Surgery
|Test Group    |  | 59                     |  | 65                  
|Control Group |  | 20                     |  | 18                  



37



---

##### Table of Contents

This analysis of the results between the Test Group and the Control Group reflected an approximately
three-fold increase in vascular density in the treated areas in the Test Group as compared to the Control Group at both measurement times.

Statistical analysis of the gray value data was performed using standard Students t-tests. Students t-tests are commonly used in scientific research for statistical analysis. They are used to calculate P-values to determine
statistical significance.

A limitation of the first clinical study was the difficulty in determining medical benefits due to the bypass
surgery versus Cardio Vascu-Grow, as both were
administered at the same time. Due to those limitations, a second clinical study of 20 patients was performed from 1998 through 1999, where Cardio Vascu-Grow injection was used as the sole therapy. There was no control group in this study for ethical reasons, as administration
of the placebo would have required surgery. The results obtained from the second study demonstrated:



| |  |  | No adverse events from the growth factor injection;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 80% of patients showed a significant improvement in their exercise tolerance test (P-value less than 0.001);
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Blood flow into the heart muscle under stress showed a significant increase in tests that measure blood flow (P-value less than 0.001);
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | No significant adverse safety effects of the therapy; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Importantly, 90% of patients (18 out of 20) had an improvement in their dominant clinical symptom, chest pain, showing an improvement of at least one class in an
anginal survey which divides chest pains into four increasingly severe categories. For two of the patients, their angina pain scores remained the same. During the stress exercise test for those patients, chest pain was either completely absent, or
began at much higher levels of exertion for each patient.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Although both clinical studies in Germany reached their clinical endpoints, and no significant adverse safety events were observed, such studies were done with a limited population. While the results were encouraging in these earlier
studies, there is no assurance that they will be replicated in our Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized trials, or, even if replicated, that the FDA will approve our No Option Heart Patient drug candidate, in which Cardio
Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient,
for commercial use. The results of these German studies were published in peer reviewed cardiology journals.

Research and Development

Our research and development is focused on developing new drug candidates in which Cardio
Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient
for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases where the growth of new blood vessels can improve the outcome for patients with these diseases, The active ingredient in its drug candidates, Cardio Vascu-Grow, is designed to facilitate the growth of new blood vessels in the heart and other tissues with an impaired vascular system.

We conduct research to identify and evaluate medical indications that may benefit from our protein active ingredient, Cardio Vascu-Grow. When, in our opinion, the evidence and results of our research warrant, a potential new drug candidate is graduated
from research to development. Each of our drug candidates follows a similar development pathway. Our first step is animal studies. We look for the correct biological response of our protein active ingredient, Cardio Vascu-Grow. We also do toxicity studies where we will look for
any unexpected side effects of our products compared to similar products on the market, if any. We will then initiate our clinical development program which will commence with the submission of an Investigational New Drug application
(IND) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). If approved, it will allow us to begin our human studies. With each protein product in development, we agree with the FDA on a case-by-case basis the extent of clinical
testing we must perform.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

As of May 5, 2006, we had two scientist employees, nine scientists under contract with our contract
manufacturer, a related party, and two other individuals involved in research and development activities under contract. Their tasks included overseeing preclinical testing, researching other medical uses of the active ingredient Cardio
Vascu-Grow and preparing and filing various
regulatory documents with the FDA. In addition, these personnel are responsible for establishing the quality of Cardio Vascu-Grow used in the clinical trials meets the specifications required by the FDA.

We incurred research and development costs for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from
March 11, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited), of $412,717, $1,469,697 and $10,947,210 respectively.

Our clinical research
and development projects include:

Clinical Development

No Option Heart Patients. During the three month period ended March 31, 2006, we added one additional medical institution, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, for a total of
six facilities now participating in this Phase I human trial that our contracted clinical research organization is managing. We injected seven more patients during 2005, for a total now of 19 patients in our current trial who have been administered
our No Option Heart Patient drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient. To date we have received no reports of significant adverse effects due to the injections of our drug candidate. It should be stressed that no-option heart patients are very sick patients with
an average life expectancy of 2 years or less. It is common to see deaths in clinical trials involving this group of patients because of their underlying disease. As the number of our treated patients increases, it is possible some patients may
succumb to their underlying severe heart disease before the trial is completed. To date we have had no adverse events attributable to our drug candidate in this trial.

Two additional patients have been enrolled in this trial and have been scheduled for injection of our No Option Heart Patient drug candidate in April 2006. After the required follow-up period, we will file a report
with the FDA listing any adverse events or other safety issues observed and then we plan to commence a Phase II study in an expanded patient population with additional clinical trial sites added. Given the uncertainty of drug candidate progress due
to the FDAs control over the course and timing of our clinical trials, we now estimate the injections into patients for our Phase II and pivotal Phase III clinical trials should be completed in 2008.

We spent $942,768 and $885,174 and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and $9,800,337 since our inception on our No Option
Heart Patient drug candidate. We estimate spending over $30,000,000 over the next three years on the No Option Heart Patient indication.

Wound Healing. During the three month period ended March 31, 2006, an
investigational new drug (IND) application was submitted to and authorized by the FDA to begin clinical testing of our Wound Healing drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient in patients with diabetic foot ulcers or venous stasis leg wounds. This is a Phase I study in which eight patients will receive either a low or high dose application of our Wound
Healing drug candidate. The trial will be conducted at a single site at the University of Pittsburg Medical Center. We anticipate the first dosing group to be completed in the early 2006. Previously, we completed three animal studies that
demonstrated that our Wound Healing drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient was a safe and efficacious agent in healing wounds in diabetic mice. In addition, it was demonstrated that little, if any, of our Wound Healing drug candidate was absorbed into the
blood stream after topical application to the wound surface. These studies were submitted as part of our IND application to the FDA.

We
spent $94,843 and $9,437 and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and $205,918 since our inception in 2005 of the Wound Healing program conducting our pre-clinical studies to support the IND submission. We estimate spending
over $10,700,000 over the next three years on clinical trials for the Wound Healing indication.



39



---

##### Table of Contents

Pre-Clinical Development

Peripheral Vascular Disease. Lower extremity peripheral vascular disease (PVD) occurs in the blood vessels of the legs and feet. PVD is a progressive disease that involves the hardening and
narrowing of the arteries due to a gradual buildup of plaque. PVD of the lower extremities is a major cause of diminished ability to walk and advanced cases can lead to leg amputation. PVD in the U.S. affects about 8 million patients, with
hospitalization of about 250,000 patients annually. An area of research we are exploring is growing new blood vessels with a PVD drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient that may improve the blood supply to the legs and feet to decrease pain and prevent tissue
loss. We are collaborating with a research institute that has conducted two animal efficacy studies for us at a cost of $120,000. Injections of our PVD drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient were given 3 times a week for a 2-week period into the
ischemic leg. Results from these studies demonstrated that our PVD drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient caused a statistically significant increase in new blood vessel formation and iliac blood flow in the legs of the treated animals. Toxicity studies to support an
IND application to the U.S. FDA have been completed, at a cost of approximately $63,000. In addition, a clinical protocol for a PVD Phase I study in diabetic patients is being prepared at a cost of $100,000.

We spent $0 and $0 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and $145,953 since our inception of the PVD program in 2005, in our
pre-clinical trials to support an IND submission for this indication to the FDA, which we anticipate will be submitted in mid-2006. If our IND is approved, we currently estimate spending over $11,000,000 over the next three years on clinical trials
for the PVD indication if, in our opinion, the results of our pre-clinical studies continue to warrant progressing this drug candidate.

StrokeRecovery. According to the American Heart Association 2006 Update, stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States behind cardiovascular disease and cancer. Those who survive a stroke almost always live
with some diminished capacity. Animal studies conducted by J.L. Ellsworth and associated persons, reported in the 2003 edition ofJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkens, Inc.,
have shown the potential of growth factor therapy in limiting the severity of brain damage after a stroke. A stroke is characterized by an area of the brain where the brain cells are dead and cannot grow back. However, surrounding this area of dead
cells is an area of damaged living cells that are capable of being restored if an increased blood supply can be provided. This is our initial target area for treatment with our Stroke Recovery drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, three animal studies for stroke recovery were completed, and these studies indicated and confirmed that our
Stroke Recovery drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient could significantly reduce the volume of stroke in the animals. The studies also indicated that the drug could be administered up to 8 hours after the onset of stroke, and still reduce the
volume of stroke in the animals. Most stroke patients do not arrive to the hospital until 3 to 6 hours after stroke symptoms, and thus, our Stroke Recovery drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient has the potential to still be effective in this 3 to 6 hour
timeframe.

We have incurred total costs of $10,000 and $0 during the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and $59,000
since the inception of the stroke recovery program, in our pre-clinical studies. We estimate spending over $11,000,000 over the next three years on pre-clinical and clinical studies for the Stroke indication if, in our opinion, the results of our
pre-clinical studies continue to warrant progressing this drug candidate.

Chronic Back Pain and Lumbar Ischemia.
Chronic back pain, has recently been linked in published reports to blockage of blood vessels supplying the lower back, leading to a condition referred to as lumbar ischemia. European medical researchers have speculated that chronic back pain
resulting from blockage of blood vessels in the lower back precedes the blockage of coronary arteries in the heart by ten years. In April we have signed a collaborative research and development agreement with the global clinical contract research
organization, bioRASI, which is a part of Russioan Academy of Science. We are planning to participate in a proof of concept clinical trial in Europe in 2006 to test whether our Lumbar Ischemia drug candidate in which



40



---

##### Table of Contents

Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient can successfully treat chronic back pain. We have completed toxicity studies to support the safety of our product for this proof of concept clinical trial. If
the results of the proof of concept clinical trial are positive, we plan to then file an IND application with the U.S. FDA to allow a Phase I human trial to begin in chronic back pain patients in the U.S.

We have incurred total costs of $0 and $4,850 during the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 and $13,533 since the inception in 2005
of the lumbar ischemia program. in our pre-clinical studies. We anticipate spending over $10,000,000 over the next three years on pre-clinical and clinical studies for the Lumbar Ischemia indication if, in our opinion, the results of our
pre-clinical studies and proof of concept trial continue to warrant progressing this drug candidate.

Intestinal
Ischemia. Cardiovascular disease in the intestinal tract can cause severe pain in people, even after the simple act of eating. Smaller blood vessels that feed the intestines or pancreas can become blocked by the same atherosclerotic
process that affects the coronary arteries in the heart. This results in restricted blood flow to the digestive tract, which can lead to pain, reduced absorption of nutrients, and diminished clearance of waste. Growing of new blood vessels in the
digestive tract may address this medical problem. We are planning to participate in a proof of concept clinical trial in Europe in 2006 to test whether our new drug candidate can successfully treat intestinal ischemia. A growing school among some
physicians postulates that this disease will affect almost everyone over the age of 70 to some degree.

Since the inception in 2005 of the
intestinal ischemia program, we have incurred total costs through December 31, 2005 of approximately $63,000 in our pre-clinical studies. We anticipate spending over $11,000,000 over the next three years on pre-clinical and clinical studies for
the Intestinal Ischemia indication if, in our opinion, the results of our pre-clinical studies and proof of concept trial continue to warrant progressing this drug candidate.

Research

We are continuing our research to identify and evaluate medical indications in our pipeline
that may benefit from our protein active ingredient, Cardio Vascu-Grow. When, in our opinion, the results of our research in addition to our evaluation of the market place potential warrant, our potential new drug candidates currently in research may graduate from research to development.

We are continuing our research activities for indications in the heart with Adjunct to Bypass Surgery, Diffuse Heart disease, and Catheter
Based Delivery. In the area of wound healing, we are continuing our research in Bed Sores, Anastomoses and Surgical Incisions. In the nerve tissue area we are continuing our research in Diabetic Neuropathy and Acute Ischemic Stroke. In the digestive
system area, we are continuing our research in Pancreatitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. In the area of bone and connective tissue, we are continuing our research in Bone Repair, Cartilage Repair, and Avascular Necrosis. Lastly, we are continuing
our research in Kidney Ischemia.

Business Strategy

Business Opportunity

According to the AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics2006 update, $257 billion dollars
are estimated to be spent in the US on direct health care costs treating and caring for patients with cardiovascular diseases and stroke in 2006. Of this total, $50 billion is expected to be spent on medical durables in 2006. Additionally, the cost
in the US of lost productivity and morbidity of patients with cardiovascular diseases and stroke is estimated in this report to total $146 billion in 2006. This totals an estimated $403 billion of direct and indirect costs in the US associated with
cardiovascular diseases and stroke in 2006. The prevalence and cost of cardiovascular disease and stroke in the US is growing and far exceeds that of cancer and HIV. We believe there is a significant and growing business opportunity for new drugs
that can address cardiovascular diseases and stroke.



41



---

##### Table of Contents

We will focus first on the growth of new blood vessels in patients with coronary heart disease. According
to the American Heart Association 2006 Update, over $142.5 billion per year in drug costs is spent on treating coronary heart diseases. Traditional treatments include open heart by-pass procedures, balloon angioplasty procedures to open blocked
arteries, insertion of stents into blocked arteries and selected drugs including nitrates that dilate the coronary arteries. If the clinical trials continue to be successful, we believe that treatment with our No Option Heart Patient drug candidate
in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active
ingredient can lower the overall cost of treating coronary heart disease. This analysis reinforces our decision to make the treatment of coronary heart disease the first market for development.

We are researching other potential applications for Cardio Vascu-Grow in humans with different types of vascular disease. As mentioned above, medical conditions other than blocked coronary
arteries that are also characterized by blocked blood vessels may also be amenable to this therapy. This may include people with diabetes who suffer from restricted blood flow to their legs due to clogged arteries, leading to amputations every year.
In addition, Cardio Vascu-Grow may be useful in
the treatment of certain forms of stroke and hypertensive renal disease.

Our goal is to establish our drug candidates with Cardio
Vascu-Grow as the active ingredient as an
integral part of the treatment regimen for cardiovascular disease where the growth of new blood vessels can improve the outcome for patients with these diseases.

The key elements of our strategy are:

Obtain Regulatory Approval of Cardio Vascu-Grow

Our first and primary task is to obtain FDA regulatory approval for our drug candidates with Cardio
Vascu-Growas the active ingredient. We will continue with our clinical trials until our new drug candidates
for No Option Heart Patients, Wound Healing, and other new drug candidates are approved for commercial sale. At the same time we file for approval in the United States, we will file for approval to the European Union. This is done by submitting
basically the same approval application to the European Commission, which handles new drug approvals for the entire European Union. We may be required to conduct additional clinical trials to obtain European approval.

About 12 months prior to the anticipated drug approval by the FDA, we intend to start the process to register our new drugs with government and insurance
companies drug registration payment system in the United States. Most drugs administered to patients in the United States are at least partially reimbursed or paid for by insurance companies, or the United States Government. Thus, to achieve
commercial success, a drug needs to be registered in the drug payment system to be reimbursable.

Our specific goals for 2006 relative to
advancing our product development pipeline are as follows:



| |  |  | Complete Phase I, of the No Option Heart Patients trial.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Initiate and complete the Wound healing Phase I trial.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Obtain FDA authorization and begin and complete the Peripheral Vascular Leg (PVD) Phase I trial.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Obtain FDA authorization and begin Phase II in the No Option Heart Patients trial.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Obtain FDA authorization and begin Phase I clinical trials in stroke recovery.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Begin the Proof of Concept trial for Lumbar Ischemia.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Conduct research to understand whether Cardio Vascu-Grow can trigger the growth of new beta cells for insulin production in diabetics.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Conclude our research to understand whether Catheter Based Delivery of our No Option Heart Patient drug candidate is realistic.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



42



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Obtain FDA authorization and begin our Phase II Wound Healing Trial.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Obtain FDA authorization and begin our Phase II PVD trial.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Conclude our research to understand whether Cardio Vascu-Grow may be a realistic therapy for intestinal ischemia.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Conduct research to understand whether Cardio Vascu-Grow can trigger myogenesis (growing new heart muscle tissue) in the heart.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our specific goals for 2006 relative to advancing our financial stability are as follows:



| |  |  | Complete a new financing sufficient to fund us at least through the first quarter of 2007.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Have our shares listed on an exchange.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | Increase the awareness about our Company in the general public and the investing public, with institutional investors, the medical community, and with payers.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Explore opportunities for a collaborative research and business relationship with a medical imaging company.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Establish Marketing, Sales and Distribution

About the same time that we start the drug registration process for each of our drug candidates, we intend to start implementing our marketing and sales program for the new drug candidate. We may enter into a marketing arrangement with a
partner in the United States and/or Europe between now and the time of such approval. However, assuming we have no marketing and distribution partner, we are in the process of developing an independent marketing and sales program. In that regard, we
have entered into a distribution agreement with Cardio Phage International, an affiliated Bahamas corporation, or CPI, to handle future distribution of our approved drugs and any other products which we might license to CPI. CPIs territory is
limited to areas other than the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, the Republic of Korea, China and Taiwan. We have made no payments to, or received payments from, CPI and do not anticipate any such payments in the near future. Pursuant to this
agreement, CPI is obligated to pay us an amount equal to 50% of its gross revenues from sales of our products after deducting CPIs direct and certain indirect costs. This agreement has a term of 99 years. In addition, we have entered into an
agreement with Korea Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd., or KBDC, an affiliated company, to commercialize, manufacture and sell our products for a period of 99 years in all of Korea, China and Taiwan. As part of that transaction, KBDC arranged for
the purchase of 8,750,000 of our shares of common stock for $3,602,000. KBDC also agreed to fund all of the regulatory approval process in Korea for any of our products. KBDC will pay a royalty to us equal to ten percent of its net revenues from the
sale of our products.

Customer Motivation

We believe there are four categories of customers for Cardio Vascu-Grow: the patient, the patients doctor, the hospital, and the payer. We believe the payer is almost as important as the patient and his or her doctor. Other than the patient, the payer
for a medical treatment can be a government agency, an insurance company, an HMO plan or a self-insured business. We believe that acceptance of a new medical treatment option will succeed more rapidly if the payers support that treatment. Therefore,
we plan to address the motivation our treatment offers with those who pay the bills for the treatment.

The important considerations of the
payer are quality of care and medical costs in the form of the price of drugs and services. We believe our pharmaceutical treatment for heart disease could significantly lower the cost of treating some coronary and other vascular diseases and
improve quality of care by reducing the need for more invasive cardiac or vascular surgery. We believe our pharmaceutical treatment for wound healing could significantly improve quality of care by potentially closing wounds that other treatments may
not be closing.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

No-Option Heart Patients

These potential customers are those people whose doctors have informed them that presently there exists no traditional medical treatment for their heart disease condition. These patients condition could be the
result of having already received heart by-pass surgery, the result of a heart transplant, or other medical conditions, where traditional medical treatments are not applicable. Based on the opinion of medical experts reported in the
February 14, 1998 Wall Street Journal, we believe the marketplace of this no-option Heart Patients category in the United States alone approximates 150,000 new patients every year. Based on the results of Dr. Stegmanns second
clinical study in Germany, we believe both potential patients and their doctors should be very interested in our new drug candidate for No Option Heart Patients in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient as treatment to grow new blood vessels for the human heart
around clogged arteries.

Specific Marketing and Sales Plan for our drug candidate for No Option Heart Patients. We will
market our drug candidate for No Option Heart Patients to the patient community through targeted advertising efforts. Likewise, we will target members of the medical profession who specialize in heart disease. Most of our marketing campaign will
involve raising customer awareness in patients, doctors and payers. A person with a heart problem does not have to be sold hard to save his or her life; he or she simply needs to be aware the treatment exists. Our marketing strategy will be based
upon the premise that the four customer groups: payers, hospitals, doctors and patients have different senses of urgency. These factors influence desire to adopt and time for adoption by a given customer group. If our drug candidate for No Option
Heart Patients delivers the benefits we hope to demonstrate, patients desire to either live or enjoy an improved quality of life should exert significant demand on doctors and hospitals to provide the our drug candidate for No Option Heart
Patients and procedure. If our drug candidate for No Option Heart Patients delivers the benefits we hope to demonstrate and if the results of the benefits of the drug include a decrease in the need for, and cost of, repeat angiograms and subsequent
treatment for recurrent angina, we then believe the cost savings to payers may exceed the cost of the drug. Then, payers desires to save costs and/or improve profits should exert demand on hospitals and doctors to provide the our drug
candidate for No Option Heart Patients and procedure. Accordingly, we intend to market our product by creating demand from payers and patients and acceptance from hospitals and doctors.

Specifically, we will (1) market economics and patient care to payers to secure reimbursement agreements, (2) market to the leading cardiac
hospitals the economics and patient care in an effort to have the product adopted as Standard of Care, which status will aid in marketing to the other cardiac hospitals, (3) market patient care and economics to the doctors, and
(4) market a state of well being to patients. We engaged consultants who have studied programs to market to hospitals and patients. We have also conducted conferences across the country, marketing to doctors. We have consultants working on
economic models for marketing to payers.

Sales and distribution will be developed concurrently with our primary marketing efforts. We will
require a sales staff to cover the major cardiac hospitals and medical groups. We may develop that ourselves or work with other drug distribution channels. If our treatment is accepted by the cardiovascular surgeons, as well as the cardiologists and
the hospital administration at the particular location, then the function of our sales and marketing team would be greatly reduced.

In the
area of distribution, the drug kit for our drug candidate for No Option Heart Patients is expected to be about the size of a small lunch box. It can be delivered via overnight shipment. While there are some special handling needs, the shipping kit
can be constructed to satisfy those requirements.

Specific Marketing and Sales Plan for Our Drug Candidate for Wound
Healing. We are currently formulating our sales and marketing plan for our drug candidate for Wound Healing. We anticipate that the strategy will be similar to the strategy for sales and marketing of our drug candidate for No Option Heart
Patients.



44



---

##### Table of Contents

Manufacturing

Phage Biotechnology Corporation, an affiliated company (Phage), manufactures our pharmaceutical products in its laboratory production facility in Irvine, California, and is our sole source of supply. Phage has developed a
proprietary manufacturing process to produce protein pharmaceutical products. To date, Phage has manufactured all the clinical doses required for our ongoing and soon to commence Phase I clinical trials and has the manufacturing capacity to provide
product for the Phase II and III trials as well. Additionally, we are investigating other outsourced contract manufacturers as a backup to Phage should there ever be any interruption in supply or capacity issues.

Based on the FDAs previous reviews of investigational drug applications submitted by Phage, we believe Phages manufacturing operations are in
compliance with regulations mandated by the FDA for Phase 1 and Phase II trials. However, Phages current or future facilities would need to be certified as a GMP facility by the FDA in order for it to begin manufacturing for Phase III trials
or commercial quantities of our drug candidates for sale and there can be no assurance that Phages current or future facilities would be so certified. As part of the ongoing clinical trials, the FDA reviewed documentation of Phages
manufacturing process and quality control systems and the clinical trial was authorized to commence. If our drugs get close to regulatory approval, additional reviews and facility inspections will occur by federal and state agencies.

For details about our contract with Phage to develop and manufacture Cardio Vascu-Grow, see Item     . Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsContractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments, Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and BusinessPatents and Proprietary Technology.

Collaboration

We continue to be open to and to
evaluate the economic benefits of collaborations on research and development activities for individual or groups of potential new drug candidates in our product pipeline. We are not currently pursuing any specific collaborations.

Training

The procedure to administer our drug
candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the
active ingredient is a relatively simple procedure for a cardiac surgeon. Based on discussions with surgeons participating in our current clinical trial, no additional training for surgeons that will administer the drug in the future will be needed.
The procedure for administering our drug candidate for Wound Healing is also a relatively simple procedure for health care providers of applying a salve to the wound. We believe that no additional training for administering the drug in the future
will be needed.

Competition

Currently, we are not aware of anyone injecting a fibroblast growth factor protein into the wall of the heart to stimulate the growth of new blood vessels in no-option heart patients. In 2002, GenVec, Inc. announced that it completed a 71
patient study with a viral gene therapy drug that was delivered to the hearts of patients. It has not been announced whether additional clinical studies will occur. Boston Scientific Corporation, a maker of catheters, and Corautus Genetics Inc.
disclosed last year that they have entered into an alliance to develop a gene therapy technology to treat coronary artery disease in which the gene will be delivered via a catheter. No efficacy results for this approach have yet been made public,
however in March 2006 the FDA placed this clinical trial on hold due to reported serious adverse events. We are also aware of several commercial firms active in pre-clinical research in regenerating blood flow to the heart. We believe most of this
research involves gene therapy which may involve more patient risk, as no gene therapy has been approved by the FDA. Other companies, including Aventis and GenVec, Inc., have clinical programs aimed at growing new blood vessels in the legs of
diabetics,



45



---

##### Table of Contents

but, again, are using a gene-therapy approach. In the area of wound healing, Genentech, Inc. is performing a Phase II trial in diabetic wound healing,
evaluating the protein growth factor vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF). In addition, Johnson & Johnson has a marketed growth factor product with the name Regranex®. See also Risk FactorsRisks Related to the CompanyCompetition and
technological change may make our products and technology less attractive or obsolete.

Patents and Proprietary Technology

Pursuant to an ownership and license agreement with Phage, we and Phage each have an undivided half
ownership interest in the U.S. and foreign patent rights necessary to develop and commercialize drug products containing the active ingredient Cardio Vascu-Grow. All patent rights were owned by Phage prior to the agreement. In consideration of Phages assignment to us of a half
ownership interest in the patent rights, we agreed to pay Phage for technical development services related to the manufacture of Cardio Vascu-Grow and the formulation of
the drug candidates, and to either purchase the drug candidates from Phage for 10% of the net sales price or pay Phage a royalty of 6% of our net sales price if we obtain the drug candidates from any other source.

We entered into this joint ownership arrangement in order to protect us from any issues arising from research that may be conducted by Phage on our
behalf that could have possible adverse affects on patentability of findings from this research. Under U.S Patent Law, common ownership of patents and patent applications covering related developing technologies provides potential advantages related
to patentability of inventions. For example, prior art developed by Phage related to methods of producing proteins other than Cardio Vascu-Grow cannot render obvious (un-patentable) our patent claims related to methods of making and using Cardio Vascu-Grow, where the subject matter is commonly owned.

Phage has granted to us a non-revocable and exclusive worldwide license (including the right to sublicense to third parties) to the patents necessary to
develop and commercialize drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient. As a part of that agreement, Phage will provide technical development services to us for the development and regulatory approvals of our drug candidates, including but not limited to, lab
work, testing and production of our drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient for clinical trials, all as directed by us. We pay Phages actual direct cost of service (direct, indirect and overhead costs with no profit component) for such development services.

In addition, at our election, we will either (i) purchase the bulk product from Phage for a price equal to ten percent of our net
sales price of the drug product or (ii) pay Phage a six percent royalty on the net sales price of our drug product which is produced by another contract manufacturer or by us. It is our expectation that we will acquire our drug products from
Phage; however, we are able to use another contract manufacturer or manufacture it ourselves.

The agreement with Phage has no termination
provision and expires on the last to expire of the applicable patent rights involved, currently August 15, 2021, but the agreement will automatically be extended for a period equal to the expiration date of any newly filed patent applications.
During the term of the agreement, Phage and we are jointly responsible for filing and maintaining all patents and applications that involve Cardio Vascu-Grow, including splitting related costs.

Under this arrangement, we have an undivided half interest in four issued U.S. patents, one U.S. patent application that is pending, and all foreign patent applications related to the U.S. patents and applications.

We have no joint ownership agreements with any entity that is conducting research on our behalf other than the joint ownership agreement
with Phage; however, we might consider engaging in such an arrangement again to protect intellectual property in which we acquire or develop an interest.

We require our employees to execute confidentiality agreements in connection with their employment with us. We also require our employees, consultants and advisors who we expect to work on our products to agree to



46



---

##### Table of Contents

disclose and assign to us all intellectual property beneficial to us or conceived using our property or which relates to our business. Phage follows similar
policies. Despite any measures taken to protect our intellectual property, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Finally, our competitors may independently
develop similar technologies. Because of the importance of our patent portfolio to our business, we may lose market share to our competitors if we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, which may entail great expense.

The biopharmaceutical industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent litigation based on allegations of patent
infringement. As the number of entrants into our market increases, the possibility of a patent infringement claim against us grows. While we make an effort to ensure that our products do not infringe other parties patents and proprietary
rights, our products and methods may be covered by United States patents held by our competitors. In addition, our competitors may assert that future products we may market infringe their patents.

Government Regulation

Regulation by government authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture and marketing of products such as ours and in our ongoing research and product
development activities. As noted above, our drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient will require regulatory approval by government agencies prior to commercialization. In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous preclinical studies and
clinical trials and other approval procedures of the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in foreign countries. Various federal and state statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage and
record keeping related to such products and their marketing. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent substantial compliance with appropriate federal and state statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time
and financial resources.

Preclinical studies are generally conducted in laboratory animals to evaluate the potential safety and the
efficacy of a product. Drug developers submit the results of preclinical studies to the FDA as a part of an investigative new drug application which must be approved before clinical trials in humans may begin. Typically, clinical evaluation involves
a time consuming and costly three-phase process.



|          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|--------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Phase I   |  | Clinical trials are conducted with a small number of subjects to determine the early safety profile, maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of the product in human
volunteers.                                           
|          | 
|Phase II  |  | Clinical trials are conducted with groups of patients afflicted with a specific disease in order to determine preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages and expanded evidence of
safety.                                           
|          | 
|Phase III |  | Large scale, multi-center, comparative trials are conducted with patients afflicted with a target disease in order to provide enough data to demonstrate with substantial evidence the efficacy
and safety required by the FDA.

The FDA closely monitors the progress of clinical trials that are conducted in the United States
and may, at its discretion, reevaluate, alter, suspend or terminate the testing based upon the data accumulated to that point and the FDAs assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the patient.

Once Phase III trials are completed, drug developers submit the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials to the FDA in the form of a new drug
application (NDA), or a biologics licensing application (BLA) for approval to commence commercial sales. Currently, all our our current and planned drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient are designated as a biologics and will be required to file a
BLA, which has, as one of its approval components, an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility producing the biologic. Following review of the clinical data and the facility inspection, the FDA may grant marketing approval, request additional
information or deny the application if the FDA determines that the application does



47



---

##### Table of Contents

not meet regulatory approval criteria. FDA approvals may not be granted on a timely basis, or at all. Furthermore, the FDA may prevent a drug developer from
marketing a product under a label for its desired indications, which may impair commercialization of the product. Similar regulatory procedures must also be complied with in countries outside the United States.

If the FDA approves an NDA or BLA, the product becomes available for physicians to prescribe in the United States. After approval, the drug developer
must submit periodic reports to the FDA, including descriptions of any adverse reactions reported. The FDA may request additional clinical studies, known as Phase IV, to evaluate long-term effects.

In addition to studies required by the FDA after approval, a drug developer may conduct other trials and studies to explore use of the approved compound
for treatment of new indications. The purpose of these trials and studies and related publications is to broaden the application and use of the drug and its acceptance in the medical community.

Approvals Outside the United States

We will have to
complete an approval process similar to that in the United States in virtually every foreign target market for our products in order to commercialize our product candidates in those countries. The approval procedure and the time required for
approval vary from country to country and may involve additional testing. Foreign approvals may not be granted on a timely basis, or at all. In addition, regulatory approval of prices is required in most countries other than the United States. We
face the risk that the resulting prices would be insufficient to generate an acceptable return to us.

Fast Track Designations

Congress enacted the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, in part, to ensure the timely availability of safe and effective drugs,
biologics and medical devices by expediting the FDA review process for new products. The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act establishes a statutory program for the approval of so-called fast track products. The new law defines a fast
track product as a new drug or biologic intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition that demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a condition. Under the new fast track program, the sponsor of a new
drug or biologic may request the FDA to designate the drug or biologic as a fast track product at any time during clinical development of the product. Fast track designation provides an expedited review of a product, which accelerates FDA review.

We may ask for fast track designation to secure expedited review of our No Option Heart Patient drug candidate in which Cardio
Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient. We cannot be
sure that we will obtain fast track designation. We cannot predict the ultimate impact, if any, of the new fast track process on the timing or likelihood of FDA approval of any of our potential products.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our managements
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation
of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the
reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments related to these estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.



48



---

##### Table of Contents

While our significant accounting estimates are more fully described in our financial statements appearing
in this Form 10-K, we believe that the following accounting policies relating to stock-based compensation charges are most critical to aid you in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.

Stock Based Compensation. The Company accounts for stock option grants to employees using the fair value method prescribed in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and FIN 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation. In March 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based
compensation. It also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. Since the Company has historically followed the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the adoption of SFAS No. 148 has had no impact to the Companys financial
position or results of operations. However, the Companys financial statement disclosures have been designed to conform to the new disclosure requirements that SFAS No. 148 prescribes.

The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued to non-employees using the guidance of SFAS No. 123R and EITF No. 96-18, Accounting
for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, whereby the fair value of such option and warrant grants is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model at the earlier of the date at which the non-employees performance is completed or a performance commitment is reached.

Valuation of Derivative Instruments. FAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments and measurement of their fair value for
accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses Black Scholes valuation model. Derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being
recorded in results of operations as Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants are valued using Black Scholes models.

Research and Development Costs. We account for research and development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research
and Development Costs. Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred.

Development Stage
Enterprise. The Company is a development stage company as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises. The Company is devoting
substantially all of its present efforts to its formation, fundraising, and product development and approval. Its planned principal operations of selling its pharmaceutical products have not yet commenced. For the period from March 11, 1998
(inception) through March 31, 2006 (unaudited), the Company has accumulated a deficit of $36,104,613 . There can be no assurance that the Company will have sufficient funds available to complete its research and development programs or be able to
commercially manufacture or market any products in the future, that future revenue will be significant, or that any sales will be profitable. The Company expects operating losses to increase for at least the next several three months due principally
to the anticipated expenses associated with the proposed product development, clinical trials and various research and development activities.

Employees and Other Personnel

As of May 5, 2006, we had a total of sixteen employees, fifteen of whom were full-time.
Two of the sixteen employees are in research and development, and fourteen are in operations and administration. We had fifteen independent contractors or subcontractor personnel with four people in operations and administration and eleven people in
research and development, including clinical development. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe our employee relations are good.



49



---

##### Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005

Our activities during the three month period ended March 31,
2006 consisted almost entirely of research and development and general corporate activities to support our FDA Phase l clinical trial. Research and development expenses increased 256% from $412,717 to $1,469,698 for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively. The pace of our no option heart study is related to the ability to find qualified candidates. This increase of $1,056,981 is due primarily to clinical cost for the FDA Phase I clinical trial of
$885,000 and pre-clinical costs for an animal study for wound healing of $9,000, Catheter based delivery $63,000 and lumbar ischemia of $5,000. Additionally, there was an increase in the consulting fees of $24,000 and an increase in the salaries and
benefits of employees as we continue to add resources to this function.



|                             |  |                                      |         |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |     |  
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | ------- | --------- |  | --- | -
|                             |  | For the Three Months Ended March 31, |        
|                             |  | 2005                                 |         | 2006 |   | $ Change  |  | %Change |          
|Research and development (a) |  | $                                    | 412,717 |      | $ | 1,469,698 |  | $       | 1,056,981 |  | 256 | %

---

|(a) | Includes $97,535 and $326,205 paid to Phage Biotechnology Corporation
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

General and administrative expenses increased 97% from $1,347,542 to $2,658,643 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. These increase of $1,311,101 is as a result of a substantial
increase in our marketing expenses of $1,031,951 as we became more active in our marketing and corporate development activities, Other increases resulted from administrative costs for computer expenses of $152,000 in relation to our relocating at
our corporate office in Las Vegas and expenses related to insurance and professional and legal fees.



|                               |  |                                      |           |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |    |  
|------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | ------- | --------- |  | -- | -
|                               |  | For the Three Months Ended March 31, |          
|                               |  | 2005                                 |           | 2006 |   | $ Change  |  | %Change |          
|General and administrative (b) |  | $                                    | 1,347,542 |      | $ | 2,658,643 |  | $       | 1,311,101 |  | 97 | %
|                               |  |                                      |           |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |    |  

---

|(b) | Includes $41,095 and $55,031 paid to Phage Biotechnology Corporation
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------

Interest income increased to $92,119 from $47,412 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This is a result of a higher level of cash and marketable securities available for investment
during the first three months of fiscal 2006.



|                |  |                                      |        |      |   |          |  |         |        |  |    |  
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ------ | ---- | - | -------- |  | ------- | ------ |  | -- | -
|                |  | For the Three Months Ended March 31, |       
|                |  | 2005                                 |        | 2006 |   | $ Change |  | %Change |       
|Interest Income |  | $                                    | 47,412 |      | $ | 92,119   |  | $       | 44,707 |  | 94 | %
|                |  |                                      |        |      |   |          |  |         |        |  |    |  

Interest expense decreased 87% to $203,904 from $1,552,319 for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest expense for 2006 represents interest on senior secured convertible notes payable quarterly and includes interest expense for amortization of deferred financing costs of $14,380 and amortization of discount for
the fair value of derivatives of $97,954 aggregating $112,333 of interest expense from amortization. 2005 represents $712,461 related to charging off the entire amount of unamortized deferred debt financing costs and $710,001 of unamortized debt
discount, both of which were non-cash expenses.



|                 |  |                                      |           |      |   |          |  |   |            |   |  |     |  
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | --------- | ---- | - | -------- |  | - | ---------- | - |  | --- | -
|                 |  | For the Three Months Ended March 31, |          
|                 |  | 2005                                 |           | 2006 |   | $ Change |  |   | %Change    |  
|Interest Expense |  | $                                    | 1,552,319 |      | $ | 203,904  |  | $ | (1,348,415 | ) |  | -87 | %
|                 |  |                                      |           |      |   |          |  |   |            |   |  |     |  



50



---

##### Table of Contents

Adjustments to fair value of derivatives arose in the period ended March 31, 2006 as we entered
into a financing transaction that contained embedded derivatives in the notes and derivated features in the warrants. In addition, we recorded option and warrant derivatives for outstanding and vested non-employee warrants and options on the date of
the financing transaction and revalued these same non-employee options and warrants at March 31, 2006. These derivative features are required to be re-valued at fair market value at each measurement date. The result of re-valuing these derivative
features as of March 31, 2006 resulted in a charge to the statement of operations of $2,707,309.

The following table shows
the change in the fair value of the derivatives that is included in the Statement of Operations as of March 31, 2006:



|                                                               |  |                            |            |                     |   |                            |  |   |           
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------- | - | -------------------------- |  | - | ----------
|                                                               |  | Fair Value atMarch 20,2006 |            | Change inFair Value |   | Fair Value atMarch 31,2006
|Convertible notes embedded derivatives and warrant derivatives |  | $                          | 10,578,898 |                     | $ | 1,525,639                  |  | $ | 12,104,537
|Warrant and option derivatives for non-employees               |  | $                          | 11,939,055 |                     | $ | 1,181,670                  |  | $ | 13,120,723
|                                                               |  |                            |            |                     |   |                            |  |   |           
|Change in Fair Value                                           |  |                            |            |                     | $ | 2,707,309                  |  |   |           
|                                                               |  |                            |            |                     |   |                            |  |   |           

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

Since our inception and through March 31, 2006, we have financed our operations
through the initial public offering of our common stock, the private sale of our capital stock and our convertible notes and the private placement of senior secured convertible notes. Through March 31, 2006, we have received net proceeds of
approximately $50,392,353 from the issuance of shares of common stock, convertible preferred stock and convertible notes payable and the private placement of senior secured convertible notes. The table below summarizes our sales of equity securities
and convertible notes through March 31, 2006.



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |  |              |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------ | ----------
|Security                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  | Net Proceeds
|Convertible preferred stock converts to common stock at 100/1, non-voting, no dividend                                                                                                                                         |  | $            | 520,400   
|Common Stock                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |              | 3,904,000 
|Total net proceeds from issuance of Pre-IPO convertible notes payable                                                                                                                                                          |  |              | 12,756,487
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | 
|Net proceeds from the initial public offering 1,725,000 shares of common stock sold at $10.00 per share net of the underwriters discount
of 7% and non-accountable expenses of 2.75%                                          |  |              | 14,681,460
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | 
|Option exercises 123,466 stock option exercised                                                                                                                                                                                |  |              | 83,006    
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | 
|Net proceeds from private placement of secured convertible notes of $20,000,000                                                                                                                                                |  |              |           
|Senior secured notes with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of Companys common stock at $8.50 per share and notes convertible into
shares of common stock at $12 per share, net of closing fees and investment banking fees |  |              | 18,447,000
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |  |              |           
|Total net proceeds from financings through March 31, 2006                                                                                                                                                                      |  |              | 50,392,353
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |  |              |           

As of March 31, 2006, we had $23,180,058 in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash.
We believe that our available cash will be sufficient to fund anticipated levels of operations through at least the first quarter of 2007.



51



---

##### Table of Contents

On March 20, 2006, we completed the Private Placement of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes
together with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of our common stock. We will incur certain penalties if we fail to file and obtain and maintain the effectiveness of a registration statement covering the Securities, such as cash payments to the
note holders calculated under formulas based on the principal amount of the notes and aggregate exercise price of the warrants. A total of $1,553,000 in transaction fees and expenses were paid by us, such that we realized net proceeds in the amount
of $18,447,000.

On March 20, 2006, Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman, President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he
guaranteed any and all of our obligations resulting from the sale on March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the later of March 20, 2007 or the first date on which we receive
revenue from the sale of drugs in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient after such drug has been approved by the FDA, provided that on such date we are not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the
senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate upon the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into our common stock.

After our obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano had been
required to make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, we will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C.
Montano to the date reimbursed by us.

Income Taxes

As of March 31, 2006, we had net operating loss carry forwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $ 30,893,587 and $ 30,887,150, which expire through 2020. Our utilization of the net
operating loss and tax credit carry forwards may be subject to annual limitations pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, and similar state provisions, as a result of changes in our ownership structure resulting from our initial
public offering and from the conversion of our convertible preferred stock and convertible notes. The annual limitations may result in the expiration of net operating losses and credits prior to utilization.

At March 31, 2006, we had deferred tax assets representing primarily the benefit of net operating loss carry forwards. We did not record a benefit
for the deferred tax asset because realization of the benefit was uncertain and, accordingly, a valuation allowance is provided to offset the deferred tax asset.

Cash Flow

Three Months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005

For the three months ended March 31, 2006, our operating activities consumed cash of $3,674,110, an increase of $1,400,971 over the three months
ended March 31, 2005. Our activity level in 2006 increased dramatically over the level of activity in 2005 in both our research and development activities and our general and administrative activities because we were able to raise cash through
our IPO in February 2005 the private placement of secured convertible notes March of 2006. This liquidity allowed us to proceed with the FDA Phase l trial, add needed administrative capability and personnel, resume our marketing activities, and move
forward with preparing us to be a public company.

Purchase of restricted cash investments consumed $888 of cash combined with $404,788
of capital expenditures for property and equipment, resulting in $405,676 of cash consumed in investing activities for the period ended March 31, 2006, which was a increase of $403,048 over the three months ended March 31, 2005.

Financing activities generated $18,447,003 of cash during the three month ended March 31, 2006, an increase of $3,391,824 over
the three months ended March 31, 2005. This increase is primarily related to proceeds from the private placement of the senior secured convertible notes payable during the three months ended March 31, 2006 exceeding the proceeds from our
IPO during the three months ended March 31, 2005.



52



---

##### Table of Contents

Funding Requirements

Over the next 12 months, we expect to devote substantial resources to continue our research and development efforts and to develop our sales, marketing and manufacturing programs associated with the the anticipated future commercialization
and launch of our drug candidates. Our funding requirements will depend on numerous factors, including:



| |  |  | the number, scope and results of our clinical trials;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | advancement of other uses for our product candidate into development;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the timing of, and the costs involved in, obtaining regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the cost of commercialization activities, including product marketing, sales and distribution;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims and other patent-related costs, including litigation costs, if any,
and the result of such litigation; our ability to establish, enforce and maintain collaborative arrangements and activities required for product commercialization; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our revenues, if any, from successful development and commercialization of our potential products.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We do not expect to generate significant additional funds unless and until we obtain marketing approval for, and begin selling, one of our new drug
candidates. We believe that the key factors that will affect our internal and external sources of cash are:



| |  |  | our ability to successfully obtain marketing approval for and to commercially launch one of our new drug candidates;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the success of our other preclinical and clinical development programs; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the receptivity of the capital markets to financings by biotechnology companies.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While, based on historical as well as budgeted expenditures, we believe that we will have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our cash requirements until at
least the first quarter of 2007, and do not expect to need to raise additional funds in the near future.

We will need to raise additional
external funds in the future through the sale of additional equity or debt securities to continue to develop our drug candidates. The sale of additional equity securities will result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Additional financing
may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of, delay or eliminate some or all of our planned research, development and
commercialization activities, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as of March 31, 2006:



|                                |  |       |            |                 |   |           |  |           |            |                  |   |         |  |   |       
|------------------------------- |  | ----- | ---------- | --------------- | - | --------- |  | --------- | ---------- | ---------------- | - | ------- |  | - | ------
|                                |  | Total |            | Less than1 Year |   | 1-3 Years |  | 3-5 Years |            | More than5 Years
|Long-term debt obligations      |  | $     | 20,000,000 |                 |   |          |  | $         | 20,000,000 |                  |   |        |  |   |      
|Operating lease obligations (1) |  | $     | 1,060,000  |                 | $ | 152,000   |  | $         | 422,000    |                  | $ | 448,000 |  | $ | 38,000
|                                |  |       |            |                 |   |           |  |           |            |                  |   |         |  |   |       
|Total                           |  | $     | 21,060,000 |                 | $ | 152,000   |  | $         | 20,422,000 |                  | $ | 448,000 |  | $ | 38,000
|                                |  |       |            |                 |   |           |  |           |            |                  |   |         |  |   |       

In November 2005, we entered into an operating lease agreement for office space in Las Vegas,
Nevada, that requires monthly payments of approximately $17,900. We have one five year option to renew the lease. Building operating expenses are reconciled annually and any increase over the base year is billed pro rata among the buildings
tenants. We occupied this property in March 2006. The five year lease obligation is approximately $1,060,000.



53



---

##### Table of Contents

Our major outstanding contractual obligations are summarized on the table below:

The service fees for the obligations below were determined through a process of competitive bids and/or negotiation. Our major outstanding contractual
obligations are summarized below:



|           |  |                                                                                |  |                                                                                          |  |           |  |                                           
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|ItemNumber |  | Contract                                                                       |  | Agreement Name                                                                           |  | Start     |  | End Date                                  
|1          |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Technical Services Agreement                                                             |  | 1-Mar-00  |  | 1-Mar-20                                  
|2          |  | Cardio Phage International (CPI)                                             |  | Distribution agreement                                                                   |  | 16-Aug-04 |  | 16-Aug-13                                 
|3          |  | Korea Bio-Development Corporation                                              |  | Manufacturing and distribution agreement                                                 |  | 15-Dec-00 |  | 15-Dec-99                                 
|4          |  | Hesperion, Inc. (TouchStone, formerly Clinical CardioVascular Research, LLC) |  | Clinical development of investigational drugs and devices for cardiovascular indications |  | 24-Oct-01 |  | ongoing                                   
|5          |  | Dr. Thomas Stegmann                                                            |  | Royalty agreement                                                                        |  | 16-Aug-04 |  | 31-Dec-13                                 
|6          |  | Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc.                                    |  | Product development                                                                      |  | 1-Jun-04  |  | Upon delivery of and payment for catheters
|7          |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Lease Guarantee Irvine                                                                   |  | 1-Sep-04  |  | 31-Aug-06                                 
|8          |  | JDM Consulting                                                                 |  | Marketing and Mailing                                                                    |  | 11-Mar-06 |  | 1-Oct-06                                  
|9          |  | bioRASI, LLC                                                                   |  | CRO agreement                                                                            |  | 8-Aug-05  |  | Completion of clinical trial              
|10         |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Lease Guarantee - San Diego                                                              |  | 15-Mar-06 |  | 15-Aug-13                                 
|11         |  | Promethean                                                                     |  | Convertible Notes                                                                        |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | 19-Mar-09                                 
|12         |  | Daniel C. Montano                                                              |  | Guarantee agreement                                                                      |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | first date of generating revenue          
|13         |  | Daniel C. Montano                                                              |  | Guarantee reimbursement agreement                                                        |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | first date of generating revenue          

---

|1) | We agreed to jointly own and license from one another the right to use certain patents including the patents related to FGF-1141. As part of that agreement, at our election, we are
obligated to either (i) pay to Phage ten percent of our net sales or our drugs manufactured for us by Phage or (ii) pay to Phage a six percent royalty based on our drugs which Phage does not manufacture for us.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | CPI will act as distributor for the products of both Phage and us in locations throughout the world other than United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, China, and the Republic of
Korea. CPI is obligated to pay us an amount equal to 50% of CPIs gross revenue from sales of our product less CPIs direct and indirect costs.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3) | As part of this agreement, KBDC arranged the purchase of 8,750,000 shares of our common stock for $3,602,000 by Cardio Korea, Ltd. KBDC agreed to fund all of the regulatory approval
process in Korea for any of our products. In addition, KBDC agreed to pay us a royalty of ten percent net revenue from sales in its Asian territories.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4) | Hesperion will assist us with the FDA approval process for our drug.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



|5) | Our royalty agreement with Dr. Stegmann will provide him with a one percent royalty on net revenue from the sale of our drug candidates, if any, measured quarterly and payable 90
days after quarter end.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|6) | Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc. will assist us to design, develop, and fabricate two different prototype catheter products that will allow the administration of
CVBT-141A by catheter procedures.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|7) | This lease is for 11,091 rentable square feet and provides for a monthly rent of approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses. This lease and the Companys
guarantee expired in September 2006.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|8) | This agreement is for implementing a wide range of marketing and shareholder awareness program.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|9) | This agreement is for the purpose of assisting in our human clinical trials in Russia. bioRASI is the strategic initiative of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and is
responsible for commercializing RAS bio-sciences and clinical resources. bioRASI is a contract research organization (CRO) providing services for its collaborative R&D clients in the areas of drug development, biologicals, and medical
devices.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|10) | This agreement is for a new manufacturing facility in San Diego, CA. The lease provides for Minimum Monthly Rent and Additional Rent for shared costs, which aggregate approximately
$20,000 per month.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|11) | We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors to place $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of our common
stock. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time at $12 per share (the Fixed Conversion Price). In addition, the notes are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of the average of the
preceding five days weighted average trading price, if the result is lower than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into our common stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no more than 10% of the original
$20,000,000 note balance per calendar month. The notes mature in March 2009, and bear a resetting floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 7%. The warrants may be exercised anytime up to March 2009. The warrant exercise price is $8.50 per
share. Substantially all of the Companys assets secure the notes.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|12) | Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman, Co-President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all of our obligations resulting from the sale on March 20,
2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the first date on which we receive revenue from the sale of drugs with FGF-1141 as API after such drug has been approved by the FDA, provided that on such
date we are not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate upon the payment in
full of the notes including conversion of the notes into our common stock.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|13) | After our obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano was required to make any payments pursuant
to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, we will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the date reimbursed by us.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               |  |                                |         |                                                                              |   |           |  |   |          
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                               |  | For the Quarter EndedMarch 31, |         | For the Period from March 11, 1998 (Inception) to March 31, 2006 (unaudited)
|Service Fees Paid for Main Contracts:          |  | 2005                           |         | 2006                                                                         |  
|Hesperion (formerly TouchStone Research, Inc.) |  | $                              | 249,615 |                                                                              | $ | 367,591   |  | $ | 3,350,886
|bioRASI                                        |  |                                |        |                                                                              |   | 57,021    |  |   | 237,039  
|Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc.    |  |                                | 21,894  |                                                                              |   | 3,325     |  |   | 52,617   
|BS Biology                                     |  |                                |        |                                                                              |   |          |  |   | 370,100  
|DaVinci Biomedical Research Products, Inc.     |  |                                |        |                                                                              |   |          |  |   | 431,698  
|JDM Consulting                                 |  |                                |        |                                                                              |   | 970,000   |  |   | 2,103,000
|                                               |  |                                |         |                                                                              |   |           |  |   |          
|Total                                          |  | $                              | 271,509 |                                                                              | $ | 1,397,937 |  | $ | 6,545,340
|                                               |  |                                |         |                                                                              |   |           |  |   |          



54



---

##### Table of Contents

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 20, 2006 with certain investors to
place $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of our common stock. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time at $12 per share (the Fixed Conversion Price). In
addition, the notes are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of the average of the preceding five days weighted average trading price, if the result is lower than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into our
common stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no more than 10% of the original $20,000,000 note balance per month. The notes mature in March 2009, and bear a resetting floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 7%. The
warrants may be exercised anytime up to March 2009. The warrant exercise price is $8.50 per share. Substantially all of the Companys assets secure the notes.

On March 20, 2006, Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman, President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all of our obligations resulting from the sale on March 20, 2006 of
$20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the later of March 20, 2007 or the first date on which we receive revenue from the sale of drugs in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient after such drug has been approved by the FDA,
provided that on such date we are not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate
upon the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into our common stock.

After our obligations contained in the
agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano had been required to make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, we will reimburse Daniel C. Montano
for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the date reimbursed by us.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

At March 31, 2006, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or
financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited
purposes.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections an amendment to Accounting Principles Bulletin (APB) Opinion No. 20, Accounting
Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements though SFAS No. 154 carries forward the guidance in APB No. 20 and SFAS No. 3 with respect to accounting for changes in estimates, changes in
reporting entity, and the correction of errors. SFAS No. 154 establishes new standards on accounting for changes in accounting principles, whereby all such changes must be accounted for by retrospective application to the financial statements of
prior periods unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with early adoption permitted for changes and corrections made in years
beginning after May 2005. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 154 with no effect on the Financial Statements.



55



---

##### Table of Contents

In February 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Instruments. This standard amends the guidance in FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities. Statement 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair
value basis. Management is currently evaluating the impact FASB 155 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets (SFAS NO. 156), which provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. This Statement amends FASB Statement
No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Statement
(1) requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations; (2) requires that a separately
recognized servicing asset or servicing liability be initially measured at fair value, if practicable; (3) permits an entity to choose either the amortization method or the fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of
separately recognized servicing assets or servicing liabilities; (4) permits at initial adoption a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities by an entity with recognized servicing rights, provided the
securities reclassified offset the entitys exposure to changes in the fair value of the servicing assets or liabilities; and (5) requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair
value in the balance sheet and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the beginning of an
entitys fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted in certain circumstances. The Statement also describes the manner in which it should be initially applied. The Company does not believe that SFAS
No. 156 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company may have interest rate exposure
to market risk with its cash and cash equivalents. Interest rates on the Companys money market accounts ranged from 3.98% to 4.45% for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The Company invests in high-quality financial instruments, primarily money
market funds, federal agency notes, and United States Treasury Notes, which the Company believes are subject to limited credit risk. The Company does not currently hedge interest rate exposure. The effective duration of the Companys portfolio
is less than three months, and no security has an effective duration in excess of three months. Due to the short-term nature of the Companys investments, the Company does not believe that it has any material exposure to interest rate risk
arising from its investments.

The Company sold floating rate convertible debt securities. At March 31, 2006, there was $20 million of
floating rate debt outstanding which is subject to interest rate risk. Interest rates on the Companys convertible notes payable was from 11.94% for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Each 100 basis points increase in interest rates relative to
these borrowings would impact annual pre-tax earnings approximately $200,000 and the Companys cash flow should it choose to pay this interest in cash in lieu of paying in-kind.

The Company sold floating rate convertible debt securities that have several derivative features. The value of the derivative features effects the
Companys Statement of Operations and Balance Sheet, but there is no effect on the Companys cash flow.

The value of these
derivatives fluctuates from period to period until the notes are redeemed or converted. An increase in value of these derivatives will result in the Company having to record an expense to the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives on the Statement
of Operations. Conversely, a decrease in the value of these derivatives will result in the Company having to record income to the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives on the Statement of Operations.

Foreign Currency Risk

Most of the Companys
transactions are conducted in United States dollars, although the Company does have some development and commercialization agreements with vendors located outside the United States. Transactions under certain of these agreements are conducted in
United States dollars. If the exchange rate changed by ten percent, the Company does not believe that it would have a material impact on its results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in
reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the specified time periods and accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Companys management evaluated, under
the supervision and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of that date, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (required by
paragraph (b) of 13a-15 or 15d-15) were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Control

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated,
can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Inherent limitations in all control systems result in the fact that no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include imperfect
judgments in decision making and breakdowns due to error or mistake. Also, the design of a control system is based on the occurrence of future events, and no assurance can be given that a system will succeed in achieving its stated goal under all
potential future conditions.



56



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any litigation.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to the Company

We have a history of losses and expect to incur substantial losses and negative operating cash flows for the foreseeable future, and we may never achieve or maintain profitability.

Since our inception, we have incurred significant net losses. As a result of ongoing operating losses, we had an accumulated deficit of $36,104,613 as of
March 31, 2006. We are not currently profitable. Even if we succeed in developing and commercializing our drug candidates, we expect to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future and may never become profitable. We also expect to incur
significant capital expenditures and anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially in the foreseeable future as we:



| |  |  | seek regulatory approvals for our new drug candidates;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | develop, formulate, manufacture and commercialize our new drug candidates;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | implement additional internal systems and infrastructure; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | hire additional clinical, scientific, administrative and sales and marketing personnel.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We also expect to experience negative cash flow for the foreseeable future as we fund our operating losses and capital expenditures. As a result, we will
need to generate significant revenues to achieve and maintain profitability. We do not expect to generate revenues unless one of our drug candidates is approved, and may not be able to generate these revenues even if it is approved. We may never
achieve profitability in the future.

At March 31, 2006, we had $23,180,058 in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. On
March 20, 2006 we completed the sale of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and related detached warrants for net proceeds of $18,447,000. Although there can be no assurances, we believe that our available cash and cash equivalents will be
sufficient to fund anticipated levels of operations through at least the first quarter of 2007.

If we continue to incur operating losses for a
period longer than we anticipate, we will be unable to advance our development program and complete our clinical trials.

Developing a
new product and conducting clinical trials for multiple disease indications is expensive. We expect that we will fund our capital expenditures and operations through at least the first quarter of 2007 with our current resources and the net proceeds
of the financing we completed in March 2006. We may need to raise additional capital sooner, however due to a number of factors, including:



| |  |  | an acceleration of the number, size or complexity of the clinical trials;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | slower than expected progress in developing our drug candidates;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | higher than expected costs to obtain regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | higher than expected costs to develop or protect our intellectual property; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | higher than expected costs to develop our sales and marketing capability.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Violation of covenants and other events of default and triggering events associated with the senior secured notes and warrants we recently sold could have a significant detrimental effect on our liquidity.

On March 20, 2006, we completed a private placement (the Private Placement) of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes
together with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of the our common stock. We will incur certain



57



---

##### Table of Contents

penalties if we fail to file and obtain and maintain the effectiveness of a registration statement covering the Securities, such as cash payments to the note
holders calculated under formulas based on the principal amount of the notes and aggregate exercise price of the warrants. We may also incur cash damages if we fail to issue and deliver certificates of our common stock in a timely manner upon
receipt of a notice from a note holder to convert all or a portion of the note holders note. We may also be required to redeem all or a portion of the principal amount of a note in the event a conversion fails. Under certain triggering events,
we may be required to redeem all or a portion of the principal amount of a note in the sum of 120% of the principal plus applicable interest. Examples of triggering events are: (i) delisting of our securities; (ii) failure of a
registration statement to be filed; (iii) failure of a registration statement to become effective; and (iv) other triggering events. Other terms and conditions that are material to the us are: (i) after a triggering event the holder
of a note has the option to require the us to pay a redemption price at the option of a note holder; (ii) a redemption in the event of a change in control at the option of a note holder, (iii) certain events of default; and (iv) the
acceleration of payment of a note upon the occurrence of an event of default.

If we are unable to comply with the terms and conditions of
the senior secured notes and warrants, the results could be a negative and significant impact on our liquidity, as well as a potential change of control of the Company.

In the future we may not be able to raise additional necessary capital on favorable terms, if at all.

We do not know whether additional financing will be available when needed, or on terms favorable to us or our stockholders. We may raise any necessary funds through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or additional corporate
collaboration and licensing arrangements. To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders will experience dilution. If we raise funds through debt financings, we may become subject to restrictive covenants.
Our recent debt financing is secured by all of the Companys assets. To the extent that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, we may be required to relinquish some rights to our technologies or product
candidates, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

Cardio Vascu-Growis currently the only active ingredient in all of our drug products. Because the development of Cardio
Vascu-Growis subject to a substantial degree of technological uncertainty; we may not succeed in developing
it.

Unlike many pharmaceutical companies which have a number of products in development and which utilize many technologies, we
are dependent on our basic drug technology for the success of our company. While our core technology has a number of potentially beneficial uses, if that core technology is not commercially viable, we currently do not have others to fall back on and
our business will fail.

Our new drug candidates are still in research and development and we do not expect them to be commercially
available for the foreseeable future, if at all. Only a small number of research and development programs ultimately result in commercially successful drugs. Potential products that appear to be promising at early stages of development may not reach
the market for a number of reasons. These reasons include the possibility that the potential products may:



| |  |  | be found ineffective or cause harmful side effects during preclinical studies or clinical trials;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | be precluded from commercialization by proprietary rights of third parties;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | be difficult to manufacture on a large scale; or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | be uneconomical or fail to achieve market acceptance.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------

If any of these potential problems occurs, we may never successfully market products in which the
active ingredient is Cardio Vascu-Grow.



58



---

##### Table of Contents

We may not receive regulatory approvals for our new drug candidates.

Regulation by government authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture and marketing of
our new drug candidates and in ongoing research and product development activities. Our new drug candidates are still in research and development and we have not yet requested or received regulatory approval to commercialize any of them from the FDA
or any other regulatory body. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent substantial compliance with appropriate federal and state statutes and regulations require spending substantial time and financial resources. If we fail to
obtain, or encounter delays in obtaining or maintaining regulatory approvals, it could adversely affect the marketing of one or all of our new drug candidates, as well as our liquidity and capital resources.

In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous preclinical testing and clinical trials and other approval procedures of the FDA and
similar regulatory authorities in foreign countries. Various federal and state statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage and record-keeping related to these products and their marketing. Any
delay in, or suspension of, our clinical trials will delay the filing of our applications with the FDA to market the drug in the United States and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize our new drug candidates and generate product revenues.

In connection with our clinical trials, we face the risks that:



| |  |  | we or the FDA may suspend the trials;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | we may discover that Cardio Vascu-Growmay cause harmful side effects;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the results may not replicate the results of earlier, smaller trials;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the results may not be statistically significant;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | patient recruitment may be slower than we expected;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | patients may drop out of the trials;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | patients may die during the trials, even though treatment with our new drug candidates may not have caused those deaths; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | we may not be able to produce sufficient quantities of Cardio Vascu-Growto complete the trails.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We may
encounter delays or difficulties in our clinical trials, which may delay or preclude regulatory approval of our drug candidates.

In
order to commercialize our new drug candidates for coronary heart disease treatment and as a wound healing agent, we must obtain regulatory approvals for that use. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically takes many years, is expensive and
involves compliance with requirements covering research and development, testing, manufacturing, quality control, labeling and promotion of drugs for human use. To obtain regulatory approvals, we must, among other requirements, complete clinical
trials demonstrating that each drug candidate is safe and effective for a particular disease treatment.

We have commenced treatment of
patients in the planned Phase I clinical trials of our No Option Heart Patient new drug candidate. A second Phase I trial has been authorized by the FDA for diabetic wound healing and is scheduled to begin in the first half of 2006. Ongoing or
future clinical trials may demonstrate that our new drug candidates are neither safe nor effective.

We may encounter delays or rejections
in the regulatory approval process because of additional government regulation (FDA or otherwise) during the period of product development, clinical trials and FDA regulatory review. Such delays or rejections may be caused by failure to comply with
applicable penalties, recall or seizure of any approved products, total or partial suspension of production or injunction, as well as other regulatory action against our drug candidates or us.



59



---

##### Table of Contents

Outside the United States, our ability to market a product is contingent upon receiving clearances from
the appropriate regulatory authorities in the various foreign jurisdictions. These foreign regulatory approval processes each include all of the risks associated with FDA clearance described above.

If we are unable to retain and recruit qualified scientists it will delay our development efforts.

As of May 15, 2006, we had two scientist employees, John W. Jacobs, Ph.D. and Kenneth A. Thomas, Ph.D., and eleven scientists under month to month
contracts, including our Chief Clinical Officer, Thomas Stegmann, M.D. The loss of any of our lead scientists, Thomas Stegmann, M.D., John W. Jacobs, Ph.D. or Kenneth A. Thomas, Ph.D., could impede the achievement of our development objectives.

Furthermore, recruiting and retaining qualified scientific personnel to perform research and development work in the future will also be
critical to our success. We may be unable to attract and retain qualified scientific personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among biotechnology, pharmaceutical and health care companies, universities and non-profit research institutions
for experienced scientists.

If any of our key senior executives discontinue their employment with us, our efforts to develop our business may be
delayed.

We are highly dependent on the principal members of our management team and the loss of our Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, Daniel C. Montano, or our Chief Financial Officer, Mickael A. Flaa, or our Chief Operating Officer, John W. Jacobs, could impede the achievement of our development efforts and objectives.

Prior activities of our Chief Executive Officer, as well as certain conflicts of interest that he has, may increase the risks of an investment in our company.

Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and the owner of 24.7% of the voting control of our
company, was engaged in the securities, investment banking and venture capital business for approximately 30 years ending in 1998. During that time, Mr. Montano or the firms he controlled were the subject of arbitrations, fines, disciplinary
actions and sanctions imposed by the SEC and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD), including a cease and desist order the SEC entered in 1992. The order required that Mr. Montano permanently cease and desist from
continuing and causing any further material misrepresentations and/or omitting to state material facts in the offer or sale of a security. All administrative action was concluded on those matters over five years ago based on events occurring several
years before.

The clinical trials of our product under the regulations of the FDA have not been affected by Mr. Montanos prior
regulatory issues, and we do not expect them to be. However, to the extent we seek approval from other regulatory agencies in the future, Mr. Montanos past activities may cause closer examination by such agencies, which could affect the
outcome of the approval process or the timing and expense involved. In addition, our ability to establish other business relationships may be delayed or adversely affected.

Also, as set forth in the following two risk factors, Mr. Montano has substantial potential
conflicts of interest due to his position as Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and significant stockholder of Phage, our affiliate that manufactures Cardio Vascu-Growfor us.

There can be no assurance that
Mr. Montanos past history in the investment banking industry or his potential conflicts of interest will not have a negative effect on us or on his ability to serve our company.

Our principal executive officers devote less than all of their business time to us.

Our Chief Executive Officer and President, Daniel C. Montano, along with Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Mickael A. Flaa, and Chief Scientific Officer and Chief Operating Officer and Vice President,



60



---

##### Table of Contents

John W. Jacobs, devote a sufficient amount of their business time to our company to discharge 100% of their duties, and also devote time to an
affiliated company which does business with us, and the balance of their time on other business affairs. We do not have employment agreements with our executive officers or key employees. See following Risk Factor about potential conflicts of
interest.

Our relationship with Phage Biotechnology Corporation, and the relationship of our senior executive officers to Phage, creates potential for
conflicts of interest.

We have a number of relationships with Phage, an
affiliated company, which may create conflicts of interest. Pursuant to a joint ownership and license agreement with Phage, subject to certain contractual commitments, we own a one-half undivided interest in the U.S. and foreign patents and patent
applications necessary to develop and commercialize our new drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Growis the
active ingredient. We entered this agreement to protect our ability to obtain patent protection on processes developed in conjunction with Phage which processes might be useful to Phage in other unrelated products. Pursuant to that agreement, we
also have an exclusive license to develop and commercialize new drug candidates with Cardio Vascu-Growas the
active ingredient. Phage provides technical development services to us, and currently is our sole supplier of Cardio Vascu-Grow. In addition to Cardio Vascu-Grow, Phage is currently in the process of developing other drug
products that are not expected to have any relation to our proposed product or business. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in our agreements precludes Phage from participating in activities competitive to ours.

Daniel C. Montano beneficially owns approximately 24.7% of our outstanding voting stock. Mr. Montano also owns 19.53% of the outstanding voting
stock of Phage. He is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of both companies. In addition, we own 4.56% of Phages outstanding common stock. Additionally, certain of our officers and directors (including Daniel C. Montano,
Alexander G. Montano, Grant Gordon, Joong Ki Baik and Thomas Ingram) own or hold voting control over an aggregate of 41.20% of Phages outstanding common stock. Daniel C. Montano, Grant Gordon and Alexander G. Montano are signatories to a Phage
Controlling Stockholders Agreement which provides for an agreement to vote together.

Mr. Montano devotes as much time as necessary to
our affairs, and devotes time as necessary to Phages affairs and the balance to other investment interests.

John W. (Jack) Jacobs is
our Chief Operating Officer and Chief Scientific Officer and serves in the same positions with Phage. He joined our board of directors upon the closing of our initial public offering. He devotes as much time as necessary to our affairs, and devotes
time as necessary to Phages affairs and the balance to other investment interests.

Mickael A. Flaa is our Chief Financial Officer
and serves the same role with Phage and CPI. He joined our board of directors upon the closing of our initial public offering. He devotes as much time as necessary to our affairs, devotes as much time as necessary to CPIs affairs and devotes
time as necessary to Phages affairs and the balance to other investment interests.

Such individuals owe a fiduciary duty of loyalty to us. They also owe similar fiduciary duties to Phage and CPI. However, due to their responsibilities to serve these companies, there is potential for conflicts of interest. At any
particular time, the needs of Phage and or CPI could cause one or more of these executive officers to devote such attention at the expense of devoting attention to us. In addition, matters may arise that place the fiduciary duties of these
individuals in conflicting positions. Such conflicts will be resolved by our conflicts resolution committee, comprised of independent directors and directors having no affiliation with Phage or CPI. If this occurs, matters important to us could be
delayed. The results of such delays are not susceptible to accurate predictions but could include, among other things, delay in the production of sufficient amounts of Cardio Vascu-Growto complete our clinical trials on our preferred timetable or to meet potential commercial demands if our clinical trials are successful and we receive
FDA approval to sell the drug in the U.S. Such delays potentially



61



---

##### Table of Contents

could increase our costs of development or reduce our ability to generate revenue. Our officers will use every effort to avoid material conflicts of interest
generated by their responsibilities to Phage and CPI, but no assurance can be given that material conflicts will not arise which could be detrimental to our operations and financial prospects.

Our Chairman, President and CEO is a guarantor of our obligation under our senior secured notes and warrants.

On March 20, 2006, Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman, President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed all of our obligations
resulting from the sale on March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the later of March 20, 2007 or the first date on which we receive revenue from the sale of drugs in which
Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient after such drug has been approved by the FDA, provided that on such date we are not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior
secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate upon the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into our common stock.

After our obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano had been
required to make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, we will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C.
Montano to the date reimbursed by us.

Daniel C. Montano owes a fiduciary duty of loyalty to us. However, there is potential for conflicts
of interest between Daniel C. Montanos personal interests and ours whether Daniel C. Montanos guaranty is called upon or not. No assurance can be given that material conflicts will not arise which could be detrimental to our operations
and financial prospects.

We may be subject to claims resulting from our guarantee of Phage leases.

We have guaranteed Phages obligations under its lease with the Regents of the University of California. The lease provides for monthly rent of
approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses through August 31, 2006. Additionally, on March 15, 2006, we guaranteed Phages lease obligations for a new manufacturing facility in San Diego, CA, through July 2013. The Lease
provides for Minimum Monthly Rent and Additional Rent for shared costs, which aggregate approximately $20,000 per month. Should Phage default on its lease obligations, we would be called on our guarantee to pay the lease payments.

We have no marketing experience, sales force or distribution capabilities. If our products are approved, and we are unable to recruit key personnel to perform these
functions, we may not be able to commercialize them successfully.

Although we do not currently have any marketable products, our
ability to produce revenues ultimately depends on our ability to sell our products if and when they are approved by the FDA. We currently have no experience in marketing or selling pharmaceutical products and we do not have a marketing and sales
staff or distribution capabilities. If we fail to establish successful marketing and sales capabilities or fail to enter into successful marketing arrangements with third parties, our ability to generate revenues will suffer.

We do not have manufacturing capability. We rely on only one supplier, which is an affiliate, for our bulk drug product. Any problems experienced by such supplier
could negatively affect our operations.

We have entered into an agreement with our affiliated company, Phage, to manufacture our drug
candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient for us and to supply it to us. The agreement with Phage expires August 15, 2021, unless we co-develop additional patents and then the agreement will expire on the date



62



---

##### Table of Contents

of the last patent to expire. Any significant problem that Phage or one of Phages suppliers experiences could result in a delay or interruption in the
supply of materials to us until that supplier cures the problem or until we locate an alternative source of supply. Any delay or interruption would likely lead to a delay or interruption in the production of our drug candidates and could negatively
affect our operations. In addition, as part of the drug approval process, Phage will be inspected by the FDA prior to approval of the drug. If we obtain FDA approval for Cardio Vascu-Grow, Phage will be required to use a facility that the FDA
certifies as in compliance with good manufacturing practices, or GMP, in order to manufacture the drug for use in commercial quantities. Any delay in obtaining such approval could delay our distribution of our our drug candidates and thus negatively
affect our ability to generate revenues.

Governmental and third-party payers may subject any products developed by us to sales and pharmaceutical
pricing controls that could limit our product revenues and delay profitability.

The continuing efforts of government and third-party
payers to contain or reduce the costs of health care through various means may reduce our potential revenues. These payers efforts could decrease the price that we receive for any products we may develop and sell in the future. In addition,
third-party insurance coverage may not be available to patients for any products we develop. If government and third-party payers do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement levels for our products, or if price controls are enacted, our
ability to generate revenues will suffer.

If physicians and patients do not accept products for which we obtain marketing approval, we may not recover
our investment.

If the FDA approves our products for marketing, their commercial success will depend upon the medical community and
patients accepting our products as being safe and effective. A number of factors could affect the market acceptance of our products, including:



| |  |  | the timing and receipt of marketing approvals;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the safety and efficacy of the products;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------



| |  |  | the emergence of equivalent or superior products;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the cost-effectiveness of the products; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | effective marketing.
| | - |  | --------------------

Our
profitability will depend on the markets acceptance of Cardio Vascu-Grow at a profitable price which may depend upon the agreement of third party payers to reimburse it. If the medical community and patients do not ultimately accept any
products developed by us as being safe and effective, as well as cost effective, we may not recover our investment and our business may fail.

If we
fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our competitors may be able to take advantage of our research and development efforts to develop competing drugs.

Fibroblast growth factor 1, or FGF-1, and derivatives are powerful stimulators of new blood vessel growth. Our intellectual property rights cover certain
methods of manufacturing and using these forms, but do not cover the primary structure of the FGF-1 and derivatives and there are other ways to manufacture FGF-1 not covered by our patents. Consequently, we may not prevent others from manufacturing
FGF-1 by a different technology. Moreover, other uses of FGF-1 are not covered by our existing patents.

Our commercial success will depend
in part on our success in obtaining patent protection for our key products or processes. Our patent position, like that of other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, is highly uncertain. One uncertainty is that the United States Patent and
Trademark Office, or PTO, may deny or require significant narrowing of claims made under our patent applications.



63



---

##### Table of Contents

Due to the unpredictability of the biotechnological sciences, the PTO, as well as patent offices in other
jurisdictions, has often required that patent claims reciting biotechnology-related inventions be limited or narrowed substantially to cover only the specific innovations exemplified in the patent application, thereby limiting their scope of
protection. Further, technology that is disclosed in patent applications is ordinarily published before it is patented. As a result, if we are not able to get patent protection, we will not be able to protect that technology through trade secret
protection. Thus, if we fail to obtain patents having sufficient claim scope or fail to adequately protect our trade secrets, we may not be able to exclude competitors from using our key products or processes.

Even if the PTO grants patents with commercially valuable claim scope, our ability to exclude competitors will subsequently depend on our successful
assertion of these patents against third party infringers and our successful defense of these patents against possible validity challenges. Our competitors, many of which have substantial resources and have made significant investments in competing
technologies, may make, use or sell our proprietary products or processes despite our intellectual property. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our issued patents or protect our trade secrets. The prosecution of intellectual property lawsuits is
costly and time-consuming, and the outcome of such lawsuits is uncertain. This is particularly true for our patents, since the courts often consider these technologies to involve unpredictable sciences. An adverse determination in litigation could
result in narrowing of our scope of protection or the loss of our intellectual property, thereby allowing competitors to design around or make use of our intellectual property and sell our products in some or all markets. Thus, if any of our patents
are invalidated or narrowed in litigation, we may not be able to exclude our competitors from using our key technologies.

Another risk
regarding our ability to exclude competitors is that our issued patents or pending applications could be lost or narrowed if competitors with overlapping technologies provoke an interference proceeding (determination of first to invent) at the PTO.
The defense and prosecution of interference proceedings are costly and time-consuming to pursue, and their outcome is uncertain. Similarly, a third party may challenge the validity of one or more of our issued patents by presenting evidence of prior
publications to the PTO and requesting reexamination of such patent(s). Thus, even if we are able to obtain patents that cover commercially significant innovations, one or more of our patents may be lost or substantially narrowed by the PTO through
an interference or reexamination proceeding. Consequently, we may not be able to exclude our competitors from using our technologies.

Third party
patents, or extensions of third party patents beyond their normal expiration dates, could prevent us from making, using or selling our preferred products and processes, or require us to take license(s), or require us to defend against claims of
patent infringement.

We may have a limited opportunity to operate freely. Our commercial success will depend in part on our freedom to
make, use and sell certain of our preferred drug products and processes. If third party patents have claims that cover any of these products or processes, then we will not be free to operate as described in our business plan, without invalidating or
obtaining license(s) to such patents. We may not be successful in identifying and invalidating prior claims of invention. Similarly, a license may be unavailable or prohibitively expensive. In either case, we may have to redesign our products or
processes. Such redesign efforts may take significant time and money, and such redesign efforts may fail to yield scientifically, clinically or commercially feasible options. If we are unable to develop products or processes that lie outside the
scope of the third partys patent claims, and we continue to operate, then we may be faced with claims of patent infringement, wherein the third party may seek to enjoin us from continuing to operate within our claim scope and seek monetary
compensation for commercial damages resulting from our infringing activity.

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry has been
characterized by extensive patent litigation and companies have deployed intellectual property litigation to gain a competitive advantage.

The defense of patent infringement suits is costly and time-consuming and their outcome is uncertain. An adverse determination in litigation could subject us to significant liabilities, require us to obtain licenses from



64



---

##### Table of Contents

third parties, or restrict or prevent us from selling our products in certain markets. Although patent and intellectual property disputes are often settled
through licensing or similar arrangements, costs associated with such arrangements may be substantial and could include ongoing royalties. Furthermore, the necessary licenses may not be available to us on satisfactory terms, if at all. Thus, as
discussed above, if third party patents cover any aspect of our products or processes, then we may lack freedom to operate in accordance with our business plan. Among such patents are various patents owned by third parties that cover the
manufacture, sale and use of various forms of FGF-1.

We may be subject to claims that we or our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged
trade secrets of former employers.

As is commonplace in the biotechnology industry, we employ now, and may hire in the future,
individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including competitors or potential competitors. Although there are no claims currently pending against us, we may be subject to claims that we or certain
employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims,
litigation could result in substantial costs and would be a significant distraction to management.

If product liability lawsuits are successfully
brought against us, we may incur substantial damages and demand for the potential products may be eliminated or reduced.

The testing
and marketing of medical products is subject to an inherent risk of product liability claims. Regardless of their merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:



| |  |  | decreased demand for our products or its withdrawal of our products from the market even if it had previously been approved;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | injury to our reputation and significant media attention;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | withdrawal of clinical trial volunteers;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------



| |  |  | costs of litigation; and
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | substantial monetary awards to plaintiffs.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------

We currently maintain product liability insurance specifically issued for the clinical trials in progress with coverage of $2,000,000. This coverage may not be sufficient to fully protect us against product liability claims. We intend to
expand our product liability insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates. Our inability to obtain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost to
protect against product liability claims could prevent or limit the commercialization of our products and expose us to liability in excess of our coverage.

Competition and technological change may make our potential product and technology less attractive or obsolete.

We compete
with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are pursuing other forms of treatment for the diseases our new drug candidates target. All potential competitors that we know about are working on gene therapies. For example, GenVec, Inc. is
working on a gene therapy drug that has been introduced into the hearts of patients. Boston Scientific Corporation and Corautus Genetics, Inc. are working together to develop a gene therapy to treat coronary artery disease via a catheter. No
efficacy results of either of these projects have been made public, however in March 2006 the FDA placed the clinical trial of Boston Scientific Corporation and Corautus Genetics, Inc. on hold due to reported serious adverse events. We also may face
competition from companies that may develop internally or acquire competing technology from universities and other research institutions. As these companies develop their technologies, they may develop competitive positions that may prevent or limit
our product commercialization efforts.



65



---

##### Table of Contents

Some of our competitors are established companies with greater financial, scientific, marketing and other
resources than us. Other companies may succeed in developing products earlier than we do, obtaining FDA approval for products more rapidly than we do or developing products that are more effective than our product candidates. Research and
development by others may render our technology or product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive or result in treatments or cures superior to any therapy we develop.

Our common stock has a limited trading history, and we expect that the price of our common stock will fluctuate substantially.

Our common stock started trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) on March 10, 2005. Prior to then there was no public market for shares of our common stock. An active public trading market may not
develop or, if developed, may not be sustained. The market prices for securities of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies historically have been highly volatile, and the market has, from time to time, experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The market price of our common stock may be affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to:



| |  |  | regulatory or payer reimbursement developments in the United States or other countries;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | product liability claims or other litigation;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | quarterly variations in our or our competitors results of operations;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in earnings estimates or comments by securities analysts;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | developments in our industry;
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | the result of our clinical trials;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | developments in patent or other proprietary rights;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | general market conditions;
| | - |  | --------------------------



| |  |  | future sales of common stock by existing stockholders; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | public concern as to the safety of our drugs.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------

If any of the risks described in this Risk Factors section occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall dramatically and may expose us to class action securities lawsuits which, even if unsuccessful, would be costly
to defend and a distraction to management.

Conversion into common stock of the senior secured notes and warrants that we recently sold could cause
substantial dilution.

We completed the sale in the Private Placement of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to
purchase 705,882 shares of the Companys common stock on March 20, 2006. The notes are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at any time at $12 per share (the Fixed Conversion Price). In addition, the notes
are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of the average of the preceding five days weighted average trading price, if the result is lower than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into the Companys common
stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no more than 10% of the original $20,000,000 note balance per month. The notes mature in March 2009. The warrants may be exercised anytime up to March 2009. The warrant exercise price is
$8.50 per share. Our stock price is subject to severe volatility. Accordingly, the conversion of the senior secured notes and the exercise of the warrants could result in substantial dilution to the existing shareholders.



66



---

##### Table of Contents

A sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could harm the market price of our common stock. A
significant number of shares in excess of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock are available for resale under Rule 144. In addition, there will be approximately 69,498,300 and 30,630,000 additional shares of common stock eligible for sale beginning
February 11, 2006 and August 11, 2006, respectively, upon the expiration of lock-up arrangements between certain of our stockholders and underwriters. As additional shares of our common stock become available for resale in the public
market, the supply of our common stock will increase, which could decrease the price.

Our principal stockholders have significant voting power and may
take actions that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

Our officers, directors and principal stockholders
together control approximately 81.82% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders have signed an agreement to act together, and will be able to control our management and affairs in all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the
election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might adversely affect the market price of our common stock. This
concentration of ownership may not be in the best interest of our other stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions in Delaware law could discourage a
takeover and may prevent or frustrate any attempt by stockholders to change the direction or our management.

The provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporate Law govern our company, which may prohibit certain business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These provisions of the Delaware law could make it more
difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our company and could delay or impede a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest involving our company. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction could cause the
market price of our common stock to decline. Such provisions also make it difficult for stockholders to change the direction or management of the Company.

We have broad discretion in how we use the net proceeds from our initial public offering and our more recent sale of senior secured debt, and we may not use these proceeds effectively.

Our management has broad discretion as to the application of the net proceeds of our public offering and our more recent sale of senior secured debt. Our
stockholders may not agree with the manner in which our management chooses to allocate and spend the net proceeds. Moreover, our management may use the net proceeds for corporate purposes that may not increase our profitability or our market value.

In selling our convertible notes, we may have violated the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) which,
if it occurred, would give noteholders a right to rescind their purchases.

Commencing in 2001 and ending in August 2004, we sold three
series of convertible notes, each bearing interest at a rate of 7%. The proceeds raised from the sale of all series of these notes have been used for operating costs and clinical trials. The notes were sold to investors who, with few exceptions,
were not residents or citizens of the United States. We made these sales in reliance on the fact that either the sales occurred outside the United States and were thus not subject to the jurisdiction of the Securities Act or were made to accredited
investors pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by the Securities Act. Our counsel has advised us that the availability of those exemptions cannot be determined with legal certainty because we did not comply with all of the provisions
of exemption safe-harbors for such sales offered by rules promulgated under the Securities Act by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Thus, it is possible that the sale of some of the series of convertible notes may have violated the
registration requirements of the Securities Act. As to most of those sales, a right of



67



---

##### Table of Contents

rescission may exist on which the statute of limitations has not run. For those noteholders that elected to convert to common stock and who have not sold
that stock, we may have a contingent liability arising from the original purchase of the convertible notes that such noteholders converted. If the sales to noteholders that have converted to common stock had to be rescinded, our total potential
liability could be $14,892,200 plus interest. That liability would extend for up to six years after the date of the sale of the applicable convertible note that was converted to common stock. The notes were converted at either $2.00 per share or
$4.00 per share. Accordingly, the market price of our common stock would likely have to decrease below its current level before a former noteholder had a significant economic reason to pursue any potential rescission rights.

We incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules the Securities and Exchange
Commission subsequently implemented, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect these new rules and regulations to continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities
more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a public company, we have added independent directors, created additional board committees and adopted policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures.
In addition, we are incurring additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. We also expect these new rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to continue to obtain director and officer
liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons
to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Our securities are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, which will limit the liquidity and price of our securities more than if our securities were quoted or listed on a national exchange.

Our common stock is quoted for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. Our ability to have a liquid trading market develop for our common stock will be
diminished if our common stock is not approved for quotation on a national exchange.

If our common stock becomes subject to the SECs penny stock
rules, our stockholders may find it difficult to sell their stock.

If the trading price of our common stock was less than $5.00 per
share, our common stock will become subject to the SECs penny stock rules. Before a broker-dealer can sell a penny stock, the penny stock rules require the firm to first approve the customer for the transaction and receive from the customer a
written agreement to the transaction. The firm must furnish the customer a document describing the risks of investing in penny stocks. The broker-dealer must tell the customer the current market quotation, if any, for the penny stock and the
compensation the firm and its broker will receive for the trade. Finally, the firm must send monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customers account. These disclosure requirements tend to make it
more difficult for a broker-dealer to make a market in penny stocks, and could, therefore, reduce the level of trading activity in a stock that is subject to the penny stock rules. Consequently, if our common stock becomes subject to the penny stock
rules, our stockholders may find it difficult to sell their shares.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Use of Proceeds from the Private Placement

On March 20, 2006, we completed the private placement the (Private Placement) of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes
with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of our common stock (the Private Placement). Net



68



---

##### Table of Contents

proceeds received by the Company in connection with the Private Placement are being held in an interest bearing money market account. The Company plans to
use the net proceeds at such time as needed when the IPO proceeds have been exhausted for funding pre-clinical and clinical trials and for general and administrative activities.

Use of Proceeds from IPO

The Company has expended approximately $11,250,000 of the IPO proceeds of
which approximately $4,500,000 was expended for funding preclinical and clinical trials and $6,750,000 for general and administrative activities.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:



|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                      
|------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                              
|31.1          |  | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|              | 
|31.2          |  | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|              | 
|32            |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.       



69



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.By:

/s/        MICKAEL A.
FLAAMickael A. Flaa Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


May 21, 2007



70