alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Louis MERCADO, Appellant, v. Jacob SOREY, Warden, Wakulla Correctional Institution; Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellees.

No. 1D17-3212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 8, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF MEDICAL DEVICE ALLIANCE INC.**

 

**Parallax Medical, Inc.**

940 Disc Drive 

Scotts Valley, CA 95066-4544 USA 

Phone: 831.439.0130 

Fax: 831.439.1725 

 

**LySonix, Inc.**

5851 West Charleston Boulevard 

Las Vegas, NV 89146 USA 

Phone: 702.791.2910 

Fax: 702.878.4510 

 

**MDA Capital, Inc.**

5851 WestCharleston Boulevard 

Las Vegas, NV 89146 USA 

Phone: 702.791.2910 

Fax: 702.878.4510
# m8556.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.8.2017 C(2017) 5777 final To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M. 8556 – CARLYLE / GTCR / ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 17 July 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which The Carlyle Group (‘Carlyle’, United States) and GTCR LLC (‘GTCR’, United States) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (‘AMRI’, United States ) by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Carlyle : global alternative asset manager, which manages funds that invest globally across four investment disciplines: corporate private equity; real assets; global market strategies; and solutions, - for GTCR : private equity firm founded focused on investing in growth companies in the financial services and technology, healthcare, technology, media and telecommunications and growth business services industries, - for AMRI : global contract research and manufacturing organization providing customers integrated drug discovery, development, and manufacturing services 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General

(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 240 , 25/07/2017 , p. 13 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ FILING DEADLINES AND CLOSING ARGUMENTS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’

FILING DEADLINES AND CLOSING 

ARGUMENTS

As the Court stated on the record on Monday, January 14, 2019: 

(1) The parties shall file their high priority objections (“HPOs”) for the Tuesday, January 

22, 2019 trial day by Friday, January 18, 2019, at 8:00 a.m.; 

(2) Going forward, the parties shall file with their HPOs any motions to seal testimony or 

documents to be used the next trial day; and

(3) The parties are each limited to 50 slides at closing arguments and the parties must use 

each slide during closing arguments. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1301 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

RUSSELL AINSWORTH; et al., 

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 18-16163 

D.C. No. 4:17-cv-00077-KAW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted February 19, 2019***

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Defendants appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion for 

sanctions in Quillinan’s civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Defendants’ request for oral 

argument, set forth in their opening brief, is denied.

FILED

FEB 28 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 Case: 18-16163, 02/28/2019, ID: 11210808, DktEntry: 21-1, Page 1 of 2
2 18-16163 

(“RICO”) action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an 

abuse of discretion. Winterrowd v. Am. Gen. Annuity Ins. Co., 556 F.3d 815, 819 

(9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendants’ motion 

for sanctions because defendants failed to develop the record sufficiently to 

demonstrate that sanctions were warranted. See Christian v. Mattel, Inc., 286 F.3d 

1118, 1127 (9th Cir. 2002) (factors to consider in determining whether to impose

sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11); De Long v. Hennessey, 912 

F.2d 1144, 1147-48 (9th Cir. 1990) (factors to consider in determining whether to 

declare an individual a vexatious litigant and order pre-filing restrictions).

Quillinan’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 13) is denied as 

unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-16163, 02/28/2019, ID: 11210808, DktEntry: 21-1, Page 2 of 2
J.B., Father of J.B., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellees.

Case No. 5D19-0693

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Bobby NELSON, Appellant, v. AZULAY INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2544

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Bobby Nelson, in proper person.

The Griffith Law Firm, P.A., and Derek R. Griffith, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”), I, Parthasarathy Krishnan, the Principal Executive Officer of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc., on a consolidated basis.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report on Form 10-K/A.





|Date: | April 29, 2016 |  | /s/ Parthasarathy Krishnan                                                                              | 
|----- | -------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|      |                |  | Name: Parthasarathy Krishnan
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 20 (Friday, January 31, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02063]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments received are subject to public disclosure. In general, 
comments received will be made available without change and will not be 
modified to remove personal or business information including 
confidential, contact, or other identifying information. Comments 
should not include any information such as confidential information 
that would not be appropriate for public disclosure.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 18, 2025.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Holly A. Rieser, Senior 
Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can 
also be sent electronically to [email protected]:
    1. Tony Steele, Tyler Steele, Carolyn Grimsley, Jill Grimsley, Paul 
Grimsley, and Guy Cable, each of Bentonville, Arkansas; Philip 
Fletcher, Hiwasse, Arkansas; Kirby Lane, Anderson, Missouri; Tommy 
Coughlin, Centerton, Arkansas; John Kallenbach and Jim Hacker, each of 
Bolivar, Missouri; Roland Julian, Rogers, Arkansas; Beverly Jones, Jay, 
Oklahoma; and Grand Bancorp, Inc., and Pam Lawson, each of Grove, 
Oklahoma; to acquire voting shares of Stark Bancshares, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of LimeBank, both of Bolivar, 
Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2025-02063 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Case 3:05-cr-00123-N Document 44 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 85
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Christy L. Shaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



Date: March 14, 2008

/s/    CHRISTY L.
SHAFFERChristy L. Shaffer President & Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
Alejandros CASTANEDA v. STATE

CR-15-1259

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Leveraging Data Science to Improve Survey Operations 

Carla Medalia

Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) 

Research and Policy Conference

11/4/21 

1

Disclaimer: Any views expressed are those of the author and not those of the U.S Census Bureau.

Challenge

Stat agencies faced with competing challenges

Declining response rates

Reduced (or static) budgets

Demand for more data

Demand for more timely/frequent data

2

Challenge

Stat agencies faced with competing challenges

Declining response rates

Reduced (or static) budgets

Demand for more data

Demand for more timely/frequent data

2

We cannot address these competing challenges without innovating!

Our mission

Leverage data science methodologies and novel data sources to improve the way the Census Bureau collects, produces, and disseminates data​

Who we are: Business Development Staff

Housed within Economic Reimbursable Surveys Division at Census Bureau

Statisticians, economists, data scientists and software engineers

Mix of federals employees/contractors

3

Some methods we use

Machine Learning

Natural language processing

Develop graphical user interface (gui)

Web scraping

PDF extraction

Regular expressions

4

Some tools we use

5

But it’s so much more than that

In order to leverage novel data sources and data science methodologies, we need to:

Collaborate with subject matter experts

Work hand-in-hand with the SMEs, production teams, and survey sponsors

Navigate policy/legal/administrative hurdles

Acquire data, software, API calls

Seek approval from: disclosure avoidance review board; web scraping board; software working group; policy office; acquisitions

Work through IT challenges in using cloud, setting up new environments, etc.

6

Today’s goal

The presentations and discussion will highlight the challenges faced while innovating and offer a roadmap for statistical agencies to leverage data science to modernize their own operations. 

7

Session overview

Machine Learning and the Commodity Flow Survey → Christian Moscardi

Parsing the Code of Federal Regulations for the Commodity Flow Survey's Hazardous Materials Supplement →  Krista Chan and Christian Moscardi

Using PDF Extraction and Web Scraping Tools to Collect Government Health Insurance Plan Information → Virginia Gwengi

Using Open Source Tools to Build a Custom Data Entry Application for Creating Truth Data → Cecile Murray and Katie Genadek

Discussion → Kevin Deardorff

8

Contact information

Session organizer: carla.medalia@census.gov

Presenters: 

krista.c.chan@census.gov

katie.r.genadek@census.gov

martha.v.gwengi@census.gov

christian.l.moscardi@census.gov

cecile.m.murray@census.gov

Discussant: kevin.e.deardorff@census.gov

9

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image12.jpeg

# image13.png

# image14.png

# image15.png

# image16.png

# image17.png

# image18.png

# image19.png

# image20.png

# image21.jpeg

# image4.jpeg

# image22.png

# image5.jpeg

# image6.jpeg

# image7.png

# image8.jpeg

# image9.png

# image10.png

# image11.jpeg

# image1.png
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J E R AL YN S MI T H, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. M A SSA CH U SETTS M U TU A L LI FE I N S U R A N C E C O M P A N Y , a Ma s s a c h u s e tt s c o rp o r a t i o n ; T HE D E N V E R O - K E E F E A G E N C Y , a b u s i n e s s o f

u n k n o w n f

o rm, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees, a nd W I L L I A M J . B R O W N , a n in d iv id u a l, D e f

e n d a n t. N o. 10- 56001 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 6 7 6 5 - MMM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a r ga r e tM . M orr ow , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r8, 2010

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia 

# FI LED APR14 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS- 2-

B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , C L IF T O N , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J e r a l y n S m i th appe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rc om pe l l i ng a rbi tr a t i on a nd denyi ng her m ot i on for aprel i m i naryi nj un ct i on . A s the fa ct s and procedural h is to rya r e f

a m ilia rto th e p a rtie s , w e d o n o t r e c ite th e m h e r e e x c e p t a s n e c e s s a ryto e x p la in o u rd is p o s itio n . W e m a ya f

f i rm the de ni a l of

apr e l i m i na ryi nj unc t i on “ on a nygr ound supp ort ed by the re cord. ” B i g C ou ntryFoo ds, Inc. v. B d. of E du c. , 868 F . 2d 1085, 1088 ( 9th C i r . 1989) . B e c aus e S m i th f a i l e d t o m a ke a“ c l e a rs how i ng” “ tha t[ s ] he i s l i kel y t o suffe r i rr epar abl e harm i n the abse nce of prel i m i naryre l i ef , ” W i nterv. N aturalR es . D ef

. C ou nci l , Inc. , 12 9 S . C t . 36 5, 37 4, 37 6 (20 08 ), the di stri ctcourt pr ope r l yde ni e d he rm ot i on. W e la c kju r is d ic tio n o v e rS m ith ’s ap p e a l o f th e o r d e rc o m p e llin g a rb itr a tio n . See 9 U . S . C . § 16( b) ( 2) . W e de c l i ne t o e xe r c i s e our“ na rr ow [ ] ” pe nde nt ju r is d ic tio n o v e rth e a rb itr a tio n o r d e r . C un ni ng ha m v. G ates , 229 F . 3d 1271, 1284 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . “T w o is s u e s a r e n o t ‘in e x tr ic ab lyin te rtw in e d ’ if w e m u s t ap p ly di ff er entl egal st andards t o eac h, ” i d. a t1285, a nd our“ r e vi e w of the [ a rbi tr a t i on] de c i s i on” i s not“ ne c e s s a ryt o e ns ur e m e a ni ngf ul r e vi e w of

the ” i nj unc t i on d e c is io n , Sw i ntv. Cha m bers Cnt y. C om m ’n , 5 1 4 U . S . 3 5 , 5 1 (1 9 9 5 ). A cco rd i n g l y,- 3-

th e ap p e a l o f

th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rc o m p e llin g a rb itr a tio n is d is m is s e d . C o s ts are aw ard edt o D efen d an t s-A p p el l ees. A FFI R M ED I N PA R T; D I SM I SSED I N PA R T.
# m8645.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels,9.10.2017 C(2017) 6884 final To the notifying part y Subject : Case M. 8645 – ADVENT / WILLIAMS LEA Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 12 September 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Advent International Corporation (United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation control of Williams Lea Tag GmbH (Germany) , Williams Lea Holdings, Inc. (United States) and Williams Lea Holdings Limited (United Kingdom), and together forming the entirety of the Williams Lea business . The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Advent International Corporation : private equity investment, - for the Williams Lea business : marketing communications services and document business process outsourcing . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
(Signed)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 308 , 16 . 9 . 2017 , p. 20 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Jennifer PORTERFIELD-COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3839

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Marvin FRANKLIN v. STATE

1160828

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Eagle Resources Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kelly
Dodge, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
March 22, 2010




Kelly
Dodge




/s/
Kelly Dodge


(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and


Principal
Accounting Officer)
Pieter BAKKER, Appellant, v. TOWN OF SURFSIDE, and Young Israel of Bal Harbour, Inc., Appellees.

No. 3D18-0231

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019

Andrew M. Tobin, P.A., and Andrew M. Tobin, for appellant.

Crabtree & Auslander, and John G. Crabtree, and Charles M. Auslander, and Emily Cabrera, and Linda A. Wells, and Brian C. Tackenberg, for Young Israel of Bal Harbour, Inc.; Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., and Jeffrey L. Hochman (Ft. Lauderdale), for Town of Surfside, for appellees.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.