alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
**Section 302 Certification**
I, Roland O. Burns, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Bois d’ArcEnergy, Inc;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 20, 2005       /s/ ROLAND O. BURNS    Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 15 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Office of the Comptroller of Currency relating to 

‘‘National Banks and Federal Savings Associations as 

Lenders’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Of4 fice of the Comptroller of Currency relating to ‘‘National 

5 Banks and Federal Savings Associations as Lenders’’ (85 

6 Fed. Reg. 68742 (October 30, 2020)), and such rule shall 

7 have no force or effect. 

Passed the Senate May 11, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 15 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chaperal Savings Associations as Lenders’’. Currency relating to ‘‘National Banks and Fed- submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule
Exhibit 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Menderes Akdag, Chief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer) and I, Bruce S. Rosenbloom, Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of PetMed
Express, Inc. (the "Registrant"), each certify to the best of our
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") of the
Registrant, that:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of
        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934, as amended; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report, fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of   operations of the Registrant.


                                   Date: May 31, 2006

                                   By:/s/  Menderes Akdag
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Menderes Akdag
                                     Chief Executive Officer and President

                                  By:/s/  Bruce S. Rosenbloom
                                    -------------------------------------
                                     Bruce S. Rosenbloom
                                     Chief Financial Officer
Michael PARTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-395

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 28, 2019

Michael Parton, Arcadia, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, WALLIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optionable, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward OConnor, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                |  |                              
|--------------- |  | -----------------------------
|August 13, 2008 |  | /s/ Edward OConnor          
|                |  | Edward OConnor              
|                |  | President                    
|                |  | (Principal Executive Officer)



---
Case 2:06-cv-00037-J Document 32 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 162
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

s0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137151 & (19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137151 COA: 284785 Kalamazoo CC: 97-000230-FC WILLIAM HALL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion to remand is

DENIED.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO PRODUCE 

DOCUMENTS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO PRODUCE 

DOCUMENTS

Re: Dkt. No. 484

Non-Parties Contract Manufacturers’ Motion to Extend Time to Produce Documents is 

GRANTED IN PART to extend the deadline for Contract Manufacturers’ production to January 

26, 2018, but is otherwise DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 18, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 502 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 1
Ruben D. FERRER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-201

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Carlos Benard SINGLETON v. STATE

CR-17-0040

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied March 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Robert D. ASWELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal of the summary denial of petitioner's postconviction motion in the trial court is granted in circuit court case number 2017-CA-1222-ES for review of the trial court's order of April 24, 2017.

The circuit court clerk shall treat this order as a notice of appeal, promptly certify same and return it to this court as with any notice of appeal, and a new appellate case number will be assigned to this appeal and an acknowledgment letter will issue at that time. The summary record shall be transmitted to this court when the certified copy of this order is returned by the trial court clerk.

After a new appellate case number is assigned and an acknowledgment letter has issued, this court will issue an order advising the appellant of the due date of the optional initial brief.

MORRIS, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
EX PARTE Earnest Lee WALKER, Sr.

CR-16-0857

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 4, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02215]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

[CMS-7077-N2]

Announcement of the Advisory Panel on Outreach and Education 
(APOE) Virtual Meeting; Cancellation of the February 6, 2025, Virtual 
Meeting

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Health and 
Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the cancellation of the February 6, 
2025, virtual public meeting of the Advisory Panel on Outreach and 
Education (APOE) (the Panel) that was announced in the January 10, 
2025, Federal Register (90 FR 2003 through 2005). CMS will publish a 
notice in the Federal Register announcing the date on which the next 
meeting of the APOE will take place no less than 15 calendar days 
before the meeting date. The meeting will be open to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-
463), as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hailey Gutzmer, Acting Designated 
Federal Official, Office of Communications, Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Mailstop 315D.02, 
Washington, DC 20201, 410-786-1307, or via email at [email protected].
    Additional information about the APOE is available at: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/FACA/APOE. Press 
inquiries are handled through the CMS Press Office at (202) 690-6145.
    The Acting Administrator of CMS, Jeff Wu, having reviewed and 
approved this document, authorizes Chyana Woodyard, who is the Federal 
Register Liaison, to electronically sign this document for purposes of 
publication in the Federal Register.

Chyana Woodyard,
Federal Register Liaison, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2025-02215 Filed 2-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

EAPI  Entertainment,  Inc.  wholly owns and operates the following subsidiaries:

--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
COMPANY                        STATE/PROVINCE OF      DATE OF INCORPORATION
                                 INCORPORATION
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
<S>                         <C>                       <C>
Duro Enzyme Solutions Inc.  Nevada                    September 6, 2000
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
Duro Enzyme Solutions Inc.  Canadian Corporation      August 10, 2000
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
EASI Studio Inc.            British Columbia, Canada  June 20, 2003
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
SuperNet Computing Inc.     British Columbia, Canada  June 20, 2003
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
EASI Games Inc.             British Columbia, Canada  June 20, 2003
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
EASI Education Inc.         Alberta, Canada           May 30, 2003
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
EASI Movies, Music TV Inc.  British Columbia, Canada  June 20, 2003
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
EAPI Center Inc.            Manitoba, Canada          September 5, 2003
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
Home.web Sub. Inc.          Nevada                    November 1, 2000
--------------------------  ------------------------  ---------------------
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
Michael Anthony BUNCH v. STATE

CR-17-0009

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Elizabeth Plaza, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Pedro J. Lasanta, Chief Financial Officer  of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 17, 2011





/s/ Elizabeth Plaza

/s/ Pedro J. LasantaElizabeth Plaza

Pedro J. LasantaChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 7, 2019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY 

OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 7, 2019

Re: Dkt. Nos. 1103, 1105

Before the Court are the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) high priority objections 

(“HPO”) and responses, ECF No. 1103, and Qualcomm Inc.’s (“Qualcomm”) HPOs and 

responses, ECF No. 1105, for January 7, 2019, day 2 of the trial. 

The Court reminds the parties that each HPO should specifically identify the document or 

witness testimony to which the parties object. Any HPO pertaining to an exhibit should identify 

the testifying witness through which a party will seek to introduce the exhibit. 

Having considered the parties’ briefs, the relevant law, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the 

record in this case, and balancing the factors set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court 

Rules as follows:

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1121 Filed 01/04/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER RE HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS FOR JANUARY 7, 2019

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

HPO Designation Ruling

FTC HPO #1 Hong, 80:25-81:1, 81:4-6 SUSTAINED. 

FTC HPO #1 Hong, 98:3-18 SUSTAINED. 

FTC HPO #1 Hong, 137:25-138:3 SUSTAINED. 

FTC HPO #1 Hong, 138:21-139:6 SUSTAINED. 

FTC HPO #1 Hong, 140:6-8 SUSTAINED. 

FTC HPO #1 140:14-16 SUSTAINED. 

FTC HPO #2 QX9233 SUSTAINED. 

FTC HPO #3 CX9252 SUSTAINED. 

FTC HPO #4 QX9233 OVERRULED AS MOOT PER 

RULING ON FTC HPO #2. 

FTC HPO #5 QX9308 SUSTAINED. 

Qualcomm HPO # 1 Davis, 240:7-9 OVERRULED.

Qualcomm HPO # 2 Davis, 260:12-261:19 OVERRULED. 

Qualcomm HPO # 3 Davis, 254:21-255:24 OVERRULED. 

Qualcomm HPO # 3 Davis, 266:1-8 OVERRULED. 

Qualcomm HPO #4 Hong, 139:23-140:5 OVERRULED. 

Qualcomm HPO #4 Hong, 173:7-10 OVERRULED. 

Qualcomm HPO #5 CX2612A SUSTAINED. 

Qualcomm HPO #5 161:6-13 SUSTAINED. 

Qualcomm HPO #5 161:14-162:24 OVERRULED. 

Qualcomm HPO #6 CX3549 SUSTAINED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1121 Filed 01/04/19 Page 2 of 2
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO DEFER THE COURT’S RULING ON THE FTC’S 

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER DENYING JOINT 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

DEFER THE COURT’S RULING ON 

THE FTC’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 902

The parties’ joint administrative motion to defer the Court’s ruling on the Federal Trade 

Commission’s motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 15, 2018

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 903 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 1
S. Con. Res. 42 Agreed to July 13, 2022

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR 

RECIPIENT OF WORLD WAR II. 

In recognition of Hershel Woodrow ‘‘Woody’’ Williams, the last 

surviving recipient of the Medal of Honor for acts performed during 

World War II, his remains shall be permitted to lie in honor 

in the rotunda of the Capitol on Thursday, July 14, 2022, in order 

to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 16,000,000 

men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 

States from 1941 to 1945. The Architect of the Capitol, under 

the direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take all necessary 

steps for the accomplishment of that purpose. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Arthur A. GENOVESE, III, DOC #Y09175, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3047

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# L_2017343EN.01000101.xml

| 22.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 343/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 343/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2017/2414

of 25 September 2017

on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 207 and 209, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision 2012/272/EU (2), the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part (‘the Agreement’), was signed on 11 July 2012, subject to its conclusion. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision 2012/272/EU (2), the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part (‘the Agreement’), was signed on 11 July 2012, subject to its conclusion.

| (2) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy shall chair the Joint Committee provided for in Article 48 of the Agreement.

The Union or, as the case may be, the Union and the Member States, shall be represented in the Joint Committee depending on the subject matter.

Article 3

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 57(1) of the Agreement. (3)

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2017.

For the Council

The President

M. MAASIKAS

---

(1)  Consent of 8 June 2016 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  Council Decision 2012/272/EU of 14 May 2012 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines of the other part (OJ L 134, 24.5.2012, p. 3).

2

(3)  The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.

3

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 307 Filed 04/11/07 Page 1 of 5 PageID 2440
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 307 Filed 04/11/07 Page 2 of 5 PageID 2441
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 307 Filed 04/11/07 Page 3 of 5 PageID 2442
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 307 Filed 04/11/07 Page 4 of 5 PageID 2443
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 307 Filed 04/11/07 Page 5 of 5 PageID 2444