alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# m8550.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.7.2017 C(2017) 5063 final To the Notifying Parties Subject : Case M. 8550 – USSL / GOLDMAN SACHS / REDEXIS GAS Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 20 June 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited ("USSL", UK) and GS Global Infrastructure Partners II, LP and GS International Infrastructrue Partners II, LP ("Goldman Sachs", USA) acquire, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, joint control of Redexis Gas S.A. and Redexis Gas Finance B.V. (" Redexis Gas", Spain) by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - USSL is the corporate trustee responsible for managing a UK private sector pension scheme for academic and comparable staff in UK universities and other higher education and research institutions; - Goldman Sachs is a global investment banking, securities and investment management firm that provides a range of banking, securities and investment services worldwide; - Redexis Gas is a regulated natural gas and LPG transmission and distribution company operating in Spain. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General

(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 205 , 29.6.2017 , p. 60 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S
Security Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 14, 2009



/s/ Ronald G. FarrellRonald G. Farrell,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, ScottD. Peters, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GTA-IB, LLC;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| May 15, 2006 |   | /s/ Scott D. Peters                      |   |
|--------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|         |   | Scott D. Peters                          |
|         |   | *Secretary  and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 8700-006]

                    1. On December 31, 2024, Amy Family Holdings, LLC, and Amy Hydro LLC, informed the Commission that the exemption from licensing for the Amy Ranch Project No. 8700, originally issued on October 11, 1985,[1]                                          has been transferred to Amy Hydro LLC. The project is located on Deep Creek and Black Creek in Butte County, Idaho. The transfer of an exemption does not require Commission approval.                

2. Amy Hydro LLC is now the exemptee of the Amy Ranch Project No. 8700. All correspondence must be forwarded to: Ted S. Sorenson, Amy Hydro LLC, 711 E Turtle Point Dr., Ivins, UT 84738, telephone: (208) 589-6908; and as a secondary contact: Michael Jardine, Amy Hydro LLC, 534 Holliday Dr., Ammon, ID 83406, telephone: (208) 589-5256.

Dated: January 13, 2025.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Alan J. Amy,*                         33 FERC ¶ 62,045 (1985) (Order Granting Exemption from Licensing for a Conduit Hydroelectric Project).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2025-01861 Filed 1-28-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald G. Farrell, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-S
Security Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 14, 2009



/s/ Ronald G. FarrellRonald G. Farrell,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Bridge
Capital  Holdings  for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2005,  I,  Daniel P. Myers,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Bridge Capital Holdings, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  such Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in such Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of Bridge
     Capital Holdings.



Date: August 4, 2005
                                       /s/ DANIEL P. MYERS
                                           _____________________________________
                                           Daniel P. Myers
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
Sharrod D. HOLMES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0398

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00027-CV

Style: Tory House, et al. v. The O’Quinn Law Firm, John M. O’Quinn & 

Associates, L.L.P., and T. Gerald Treece as Independent Executor of

the Estate of John M. O’Quinn, Deceased

Date motion filed*: November 17, 2014

Type of motions: Amended Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Attorney

Parties filing motions: Appellees The O’Quinn Law Firm and John M. O’Quinn &

Associates, L.L.P.’s counsel Mike O’Brien

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

The amended motion to withdraw and substitute attorney is granted because substitute

attorneys Kenneth R. Breitbeil and Norma N. Bennett filed a notice of appearance as 

co-counsel for appellees on November 13, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.2, 6.5(d).

The Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Mike O’Brien as counsel for appellees

The O’Quinn Law Firm and John M. O’Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. and to substitute

Mr. Breitbeil and Ms. Bennett as lead counsel for those appellees.

Judge’s signature: /s/ EvelynV. Keyes

  

Date: November 20, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0639

__________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. ORDER

RYAN BARKLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

__________________

The parties to this appeal have filed a stipulation and motion to 

dismiss the appeal with prejudice. The parties stipulate that the case 

should be remanded for the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula 

County, to strike conditions 37 and 38 from the written judgment in DC20-473, and that the appeal should be dismissed upon that remand. The 

parties further move that remittitur should issue immediately. Good 

cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is remanded for the Fourth 

Judicial District Court, Missoula County, to revise the written judgment 

in DC-20-473 by striking conditions 37 and 38.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of this appeal is 

DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that remittitur shall issue 

immediately.

04/14/2022
The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel 

of record and to the Honorable Jason Marks, presiding judge.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 14 2022
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM F. SUTTON FAMILY, LLP, William Sutton, Jr., and Carol Sutton, Respondents.

Case No. 2D18-5121

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBAENES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Getting Ready  Corporation (the
'Company')  on Form  10-QKSB for the three and nine month  period ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  'Report'),  each of the  undersigned  officers of the  Company  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbaenes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer's knowledge: Section 13(a)

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
            Section 15 (d) of the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934: and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods  expressed in the
            Report.

      In accordance  with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by
the following  persons on behalf of the  registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.



                                      Getting Ready Corporation



Date: August 12, 2005          By:  /s/ Sheldon R. Rose
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Sheldon R. Rose
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                           Accounting Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:
March 21, 2008
    
    /s/ Robert L. Chioini

          Robert L. Chioini
          Chief Executive OfficerDated:
March 21, 2008
    
    /s/ Thomas E. Klema

          Thomas E. Klema
          Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BESTWAY (USA), INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PIETRO PASQUALE-ANTONI SGROMO, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00205-HSG 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 

AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Re: Dkt. No. 130

On October 22, 2018, Leonard Gregory Scott brought this motion for a temporary 

restraining order and preliminary injunction to enjoin Pietro Pasquale-Antoni Sgromo from 

continuing arbitration he has initiated against Scott. See Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 

and Preliminary Injunction (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 130. Scott brought a similar motion on September 

17, see Dkt. No. 119, which the Court denied because Scott had not established a likelihood of 

success on the merits, see Dkt. No. 122. In this motion, Scott has provided significantly more 

background facts and exhibits to support his claims. However, Scott again fails to establish a 

likelihood of success on the merits.

A temporary restraining order is an “extraordinary remedy” that the court should award 

only upon a clear showing that the party is entitled to such relief. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. 

Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). Such an order may be issued only where the moving party 

has established: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood of irreparable harm to 

plaintiff in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) the balance of equities tips in plaintiff's favor; and 

(4) that an injunction is in the public interest. See id. at 22.

 Scott has failed to establish his likelihood of success on the merits. Scott points to

Sgromo’s arbitration demand, see Dkt. No. 82-2, and the arbitrator’s rulings, see Dkt. Nos. 130-2 
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

& 130-3, as establishing the necessity of an injunction because the arbitration “could lead to 

inconsistent or contradictory rulings,” Mot. at 3:4. But Sgromo’s arbitration demand is wideranging, and covers matters well beyond those raised in the interpleader action in this Court. See 

Dkt. No. 82-2. And the arbitrator has not yet even determined the scope of what will be arbitrated. 

See Dkt. Nos. 130-2 at 3, 130-3 at 1. Thus, allowing the arbitration to continue will not 

necessarily result in any conflicts with this Court’s orders. Scott is, of course, free to raise the 

prospect of conflict as to specific issues with the arbitrator, based on the record presented.

Accordingly, the motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

10/24/2018
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 30 

To amend S. Res. 458 of the Ninety-eighth Congress, as amended. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To amend S. Res. 458 of the Ninety-eighth Congress, as 

amended. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. PAY OF STAFF OF THE SERGEANT AT ARMS 

3 AND DOORKEEPER OF THE SENATE AND THE 

4 SECRETARY OF THE SENATE DISPLACED BY A 

5 CHANGE IN LEADERSHIP. 

6 Section 6(a) of Senate Resolution 458 (98th Con7 gress), agreed to October 4, 1984, is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (3)(A)— 

9 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

10 end; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 30 ATS 

1 (B) in clause (ii), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(iii) of— 

5 ‘‘(I) the Sergeant at Arms and 

6 Doorkeeper of the Senate, or 

7 ‘‘(II) the Secretary of the Sen8 ate,’’; and 

9 (2) in paragraph (4)— 

10 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

11 (i) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

12 the end; and 

13 (ii) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

14 the end; and 

15 (iii) by adding at the end the fol16 lowing: 

17 ‘‘(iii) in the case of employment de18 scribed in paragraph (3)(A)(iii)(I), a 

19 change in the individual occupying the po20 sition of Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper 

21 of the Senate, or 

22 ‘‘(iv) in the case of employment de23 scribed in paragraph (3)(A)(iii)(II), a 

24 change in the individual occupying the poVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:39 Feb 03, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR30.ATS SR30

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 30 ATS 

1 sition of Secretary of the Senate, and’’; 

2 and 

3 (B) in subparagraph (B)— 

4 (i) by striking ‘‘or the Senator’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘the Senator’’; and 

6 (ii) by inserting ‘‘the Sergeant at 

7 Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate, or the 

8 Secretary of the Senate,’’ after ‘‘expiring,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   7-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,779
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                       277
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,595
<PP&E>                                          14,971
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,584
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,823)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,534
<SALES>                                         23,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,848
<CGS>                                           31,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,280)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)
        

</TABLE>