##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 2



---



|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commission File No. 0-51172



---

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 33-0795984                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 250

Las Vegas, Nevada

(Address of
principal executive offices)

89134

(Zip Code)

702-839-7200

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.    Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated
filer ̈Accelerated filer ̈Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes ̈No  x

As of October 31, 2006, there were 124,653,737
shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding.



---



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Explanatory Note

This Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-Q/A
amends CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc.s original Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter September 30, 2006, as initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 6, 2006.

This Amendment No. 2 is being filed to correct the Additional Paid-In Capital Restated and Total columns for Option and Warrant Derivatives for the
Balance of September 30, 2006 of the Statements of Stockholders Equity page 6, the Amortization of Discount Related to Warrant Derivatives, for the Period from March 11, 1998 (Inception) to September 30, 2006 Restated column of the
Statement of Cash Flows page 7, the Earnings Per Share, Diluted Earnings Per Share of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 Restated column of the Statement of Operations table on page 4 and the Stock Options and Convertible Notes
Payable of September 30, 2006 column on the table on page 15. Aside from minor typographical and formatting corrections, we have not amended or updated any other information included in this Form 10-Q/A filed May 21, 2007.

*****

CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc.
filed Amendment No. 1 to its original Quarterly Report on May 21, 2007 to correct an error in identifying certain financial instruments as derivatives in the application of certain accounting principles related to the issuance of employee stock
option and warrant transactions in prior periods. EITF 00-19 Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in a Companys Own Stock required the Company to adjust the fair value of
these previously issued and vested options and warrants and reclassify them from additional paid in capital to derivative liability accounts on the balance sheet.



INDEX



|                                                                                    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                      |  |     
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----
|                                                                                    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                      |  | Page
|Part I -
Financial Information                                                      |  | 3                                                                                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Item 1.                                                                             |  | Financial Statements                                                                                                                                                                 |  | 3   
|                                                                                    |  | Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006 (Unaudited)                                                                                                            |  | 3   
|                                                                                    |  | Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the Nine Months and Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and for the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 |  | 4   
|                                                                                    |  | Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited) for the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006                                                        |  | 5   
|                                                                                    |  | Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and for the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006                  |  | 7   
|                                                                                    |  | Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements                                                                                                                                              |  | 9   
|Item 2.                                                                             |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                                                                                                |  | 35  
|Item 3.                                                                             |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                                                                                                           |  | 57  
|Item 4.                                                                             |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                                                                                              |  | 57  
|Part II -
Other Information                                                         |  |                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Item 1.                                                                             |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                                                                                                    |  | 58  
|Item 1A.                                                                            |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                                                                                         |  | 58  
|Item 2.                                                                             |  | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds                                                                                                                          |  | 69  
|Item 3.                                                                             |  | Defaults Upon Senior Securities                                                                                                                                                      |  | 70  
|Item 4.                                                                             |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                                                                                                  |  | 70  
|Item 5.                                                                             |  | Other Information                                                                                                                                                                    |  | 71  
|Item 6.                                                                             |  | Exhibits                                                                                                                                                                             |  | 71  
|SIGNATURES                                                                          |  | 72                                                                                                                                                                                  
|EX-31.1                                                                             |  |                                                                                                                                                                                      |  |     
|EX-31.2                                                                             |  |                                                                                                                                                                                      |  |     
|EX-32 (Certifications required under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |  |                                                                                                                                                                                     



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2005 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)



|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----------- | - | ------------------------- | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  | December 31,2005 |             |   | September 30,2006Restated |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   | (unaudited)               |  
|ASSETS                                                                                                                                                                             |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Current Assets:                                                                                                                                                                    |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                                                          |  | $                | 8,674,590   |   |                           | $ | 12,864,076  |  
|Restricted cash                                                                                                                                                                    |  |                  | 137,363     |   |                           |   | 170,895     |  
|Due from an affiliate                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  | 1,407       |   |                           |   | 64,719      |  
|Prepaid assets                                                                                                                                                                     |  |                  | 449,281     |   |                           |   | 2,030,298   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  | 9,262,641   |   |                           |   | 15,129,988  |  
|Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation ($14,210 and $106,494, as of December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006,
respectively)                                       |  |                  | 199,123     |   |                           |   | 685,266     |  
|Deferred financing cost, net of amortization ($0 and $1,374,788, as of December 31, 2005 and September 31, 2006, respectively)                                                     |  |                  |            |   |                           |   | 1,374,788   |  
|Other assets                                                                                                                                                                       |  |                  | 26,750      |   |                           |   | 78,655      |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Total assets                                                                                                                                                                       |  | $                | 9,488,514   |   |                           | $ | 17,268,697  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)                                                                                                                                     |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Current Liabilities:                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Accrued interest payable                                                                                                                                                           |  | $                | 434         |   |                           | $ | 618,986     |  
|Due to an affiliate                                                                                                                                                                |  |                  |            |   |                           |   | 8,033       |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  | 173,763     |   |                           |   | 524,605     |  
|Accrued payroll and payroll taxes                                                                                                                                                  |  |                  | 125,430     |   |                           |   | 102,109     |  
|Deferred Rent                                                                                                                                                                      |  |                  |            |   |                           |   | 79,148      |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                                                                          |  |                  | 299,627     |   |                           |   | 1,332,881   |  
|Derivative Liabilities                                                                                                                                                             |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Convertible notes payable and embedded derivatives                                                                                                                                 |  |                  |            |   |                           |   | 12,730,855  |  
|Warrant derivatives                                                                                                                                                                |  |                  |            |   |                           |   | 662,750     |  
|Option derivatives                                                                                                                                                                 |  |                  |            |   |                           |   | 3,274,760   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                                                                                  |  |                  | 299,627     |   |                           |   | 18,001,246  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Commitments and contingencies                                                                                                                                                      |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Stockholders Equity (deficit)                                                                                                                                                     |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 52,850 shares issued; no shares outstanding at December 31, 2005
and September 30, 2006, respectively |  |                  |            |   |                           |   |             |  
|Common stock, $0.001 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized; 123,899,598 and 124,336,234 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005
and September 30, 2006, respectively |  |                  | 123,899     |   |                           |   | 124,336     |  
|Committed common stock                                                                                                                                                             |  |                  |            |   |                           |   | 28          |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                                                         |  |                  | 38,222,166  |   |                           |   | 28,211,051  |  
|Deficit accumulated during the development stage                                                                                                                                   |  |                  | (29,157,178 | ) |                           |   | (29,067,964 | )
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Total stockholders equity (deficit)                                                                                                                                               |  |                  | 9,188,887   |   |                           |   | (732,549    | )
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit)                                                                                                                               |  | $                | 9,488,514   |   |                           | $ | 17,268,697  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  |             |   |                           |   |             |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

FOR THE NINE MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2006 AND FOR

THE PERIOD
FROM MARCH 11, 1998 (INCEPTION) TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2006





|                                                                                         |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ----------- | - | -------------------------------- | - | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------------- | - |  | -------- | ----------- | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                         |  | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, |             |   | Three Months Ended September 30, |   |             | For the Period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30,2006 | 
|                                                                                         |  | 2005                           |             |   | 2006Restated                     |   |             | 2005                                                                |  |   | 2006 Restated |   |  | Restated |            
|Operating expenses:                                                                      |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Research and development (a)                                                             |  | $                              | 2,266,631   |   |                                  | $ | 4,756,693   |                                                                     |  | $ | 1,071,517     |   |  | $        | 1,555,211   |   |  | $ | 14,234,206  |  
|Selling, general and administrative (b)                                                  |  |                                | 6,577,642   |   |                                  |   | 8,801,457   |                                                                     |  |   | 3,363,393     |   |  |          | 3,150,552   |   |  |   | 23,331,244  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Total operating expenses                                                                 |  |                                | 8,844,273   |   |                                  |   | 13,558,150  |                                                                     |  |   | 4,434,910     |   |  |          | 4,705,763   |   |  |   | 37,565,450  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Operating loss                                                                           |  | $                              | (8,844,273  | ) |                                  |   | (13,558,150 | )                                                                   |  | $ | (4,434,910    | ) |  | $        | (4,705,763  | ) |  | $ | (37,565,450 | )
|Other income (expenses)                                                                  |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Interest income                                                                          |  |                                | 209,255     |   |                                  |   | 604,774     |                                                                     |  |   | 86,001        |   |  |          | 205,830     |   |  |   | 964,748     |  
|Interest expense                                                                         |  |                                | (1,589,485  | ) |                                  |   | (3,588,970  | )                                                                   |  |   | (37,539       | ) |  |          | (1,775,719  | ) |  |   | (9,078,568  | )
|Other income (expenses)                                                                  |  |                                |            |   |                                  |   |            |                                                                     |  |   |              |   |  |          |            |   |  |   | (5,254      | )
|Adjustments to fair value of derivatives                                                 |  |                                |            |   |                                  |   | 8,632,765   |                                                                     |  |   |              |   |  |          | 4,941,277   |   |  |   | 8,632,765   |  
|Adjustments to fair value of derivatives- Warrant and option derivatives                 |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   | 7,998,795   |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          | 3,058,920   |   |  |   | 7,998,795   |  
|Equity in loss of unconsolidated investee                                                |  |                                |            |   |                                  |   |            |                                                                     |  |   |              |   |  |          |            |   |  |   | (15,000     | )
|                                                                                         |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net other income (expenses)                                                              |  |                                | (1,380,230  | ) |                                  |   | 13,647,364  |                                                                     |  |   | 48,462        |   |  |          | 6,430,308   |   |  |   | 8,497,486   |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss before Provision for Income Taxes                                               |  |                                | (10,224,503 | ) |                                  |   | 89,214      |                                                                     |  |   | (4,386,448    | ) |  |          | 1,724,545   |   |  |   | (29,067,964 | )
|Provision for income taxes                                                               |  |                                |            |   |                                  |   |            |                                                                     |  |   |              |   |  |          |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Net income(loss)                                                                         |  | $                              | (10,224,503 | ) |                                  | $ | 89,214      |                                                                     |  | $ | (4,386,448    | ) |  | $        | 1,724,545   |   |  | $ | (29,067,964 | )
|                                                                                         |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Earnings per share                                                                       |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Basic earnings per share                                                                 |  | $                              | (0.09       | ) |                                  | $ | 0.00        |                                                                     |  | $ | (0.04         | ) |  | $        | 0.01        |   |  |   |             |  
|Diluted earnings per share                                                               |  | $                              | (0.09       | ) |                                  | $ | 0.00        |                                                                     |  | $ | (0.04         | ) |  | $        | 0.02        |   |  |   |             |  
|Shares used to calculate loss per share                                                  |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Basic earnings per share                                                                 |  |                                | 119,526,639 |   |                                  |   | 124,029,565 |                                                                     |  |   | 122,664,860   |   |  |          | 124,081,534 |   |  |   |             |  
|Diluted earnings per share                                                               |  |                                | 119,526,639 |   |                                  |   | 127,129,201 |                                                                     |  |   | 122,664,860   |   |  |          | 127,181,171 |   |  |   |             |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                |             |   |                                  |   |             |                                                                     |  |   |               |   |  |          |             |   |  |   |             |  
|(a)    Research and development with related parties (Notes 4 and 13)                    |  | $                              | 716,587     |   |                                  | $ | 2,272,227   |                                                                     |  | $ | 348,106       |   |  | $        | 1,140,773   |   |  | $ | 5,396,187   |  
|(b)    Selling general and administrative expenses with related parties (Notes 4 and 13) |  | $                              | 480,276     |   |                                  | $ | 1,728,806   |                                                                     |  | $ | 200,991       |   |  | $        | 164,665     |   |  | $ | 7,126,907   |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(UNAUDITED)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 11, 1998 (INCEPTION) TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2006



|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | - | ------ | -------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------ | - | -------------- | - |  | ------------------------ |  | - | ------------------ |  | - | ----- | - |  | - | --------- | - |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                       |  | Date       |   |        | Price Per EquityUnit |        | Preferred Stock Series A, Convertible |        |   | Common Stock |   | CommittedStock |   |  | AdditionalPaid-InCapital |  |   | AccumulatedDeficit |  |   | Total |  
|                                                                       |  |            |   | Shares |                      |        | Amount                                |        |   | Shares       |   | Amount         |   |  |                          | 
|Balance, March 11, 1998 (date of inception)                            |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |       |   |              | $ |               |   |  |                         |  | $ |                   |  | $ |      |   |  | $ |          |   |  | $ |           |   |  | $ |           |  
|Issuance of common stock to founders                                   |  | (1         | ) |        | $                    | 0.001  |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 93,050,000               |  |   | 93,050             |  |   | 67    |   |  |   | (92,186   | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   | 931        |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 7/9/1998   |   |        |                      | 0.10   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 300,000                  |  |   | 300                |  |   |       |   |  |   | 29,700    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 30,000     |  
|Issuance of preferred stock for cash                                   |  | (1         | ) |        |                      | 9.85   |                                       | 52,850 |   |              |   | 53             |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   | 520,347   |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 520,400    |  
|Net loss (unaudited)                                                   |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (567,864   | ) |  |   | (567,864   | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 1998                                             |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       | 52,850 |   |              |   | 53             |   |  | 93,350,000               |  |   | 93,350             |  |   | 67    |   |  |   | 457,861   |   |  |   | (567,864   | ) |  |   | (16,533    | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of common stock to founders                                   |  | (2         | ) |        | $                    | 0.001  |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 4,580,000                |  |   | 4,580              |  |   | (46   | ) |  |   | (4,488    | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   | 46         |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 6/25/1999  |   |        |                      | 0.30   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 66,800                   |  |   | 67                 |  |   |       |   |  |   | 19,933    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 20,000     |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 6/25/1999  |   |        |                      | 0.30   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 100,000                  |  |   | 100                |  |   |       |   |  |   | 29,900    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 30,000     |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 10/5/1999  |   |        |                      | 0.30   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 340,000                  |  |   | 340                |  |   |       |   |  |   | 101,660   |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 102,000    |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                                 |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   | 82,293    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 82,293     |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (654,875   | ) |  |   | (654,875   | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 1999                                             |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       | 52,850 |   |              |   | 53             |   |  | 98,436,800               |  |   | 98,437             |  |   | 21    |   |  |   | 687,159   |   |  |   | (1,222,739 | ) |  |   | (437,069   | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of common stock to founders                                   |  | (3         | ) |        | $                    | 0.001  |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 2,120,000                |  |   | 2,120              |  |   | (21   | ) |  |   | (2,078    | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   | 21         |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 12/21/2000 |   |        |                      | 0.4117 |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 8,750,000                |  |   | 8,750              |  |   |       |   |  |   | 3,593,250 |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 3,602,000  |  
|Issuance of common stock for conversion of convertible preferred stock |  | (4         | ) |        |                      | 0.10   |                                       | (1,500 | ) |              |   | (2             | ) |  | 150,000                  |  |   | 150                |  |   |       |   |  |   | (148      | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of common stock for services                                  |  | (5         | ) |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 583,300                  |  |   | 583                |  |   |       |   |  |   | (583      | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                                 |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   | 73,660    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 73,660     |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (2,232,877 | ) |  |   | (2,232,877 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2000                                             |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       | 51,350 |   |              |   | 51             |   |  | 110,040,100              |  |   | 110,040            |  |   |      |   |  |   | 4,351,260 |   |  |   | (3,455,616 | ) |  |   | 1,005,735  |  
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                      |  | 8/10/2001  |   |        |                      | 0.80   |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  | 150,000                  |  |   | 150                |  |   |       |   |  |   | 119,850   |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 120,000    |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (1,664,954 | ) |  |   | (1,664,954 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2001                                             |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       | 51,350 |   |              |   | 51             |   |  | 110,190,100              |  |   | 110,190            |  |   |      |   |  |   | 4,471,110 |   |  |   | (5,120,570 | ) |  |   | (539,219   | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (1,328,460 | ) |  |   | (1,328,460 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2002                                             |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       | 51,350 |   |              |   | 51             |   |  | 110,190,100              |  |   | 110,190            |  |   |      |   |  |   | 4,471,110 |   |  |   | (6,449,030 | ) |  |   | (1,867,679 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                                 |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   | 47,120    |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 47,120     |  
|Issuance of warrants for services                                      |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   | 119,744   |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 119,744    |  
|Net loss                                                               |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   | (2,328,748 | ) |  |   | (2,328,748 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2003                                             |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       | 51,350 |   |              |   | 51             |   |  | 110,190,100              |  |   | 110,190            |  |   |      |   |  |   | 4,637,974 |   |  |   | (8,777,778 | ) |  |   | (4,029,563 | )
|                                                                       |  |            |   |        |                      |        |                                       |        |   |              |   |                |   |  |                          |  |   |                    |  |   |       |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |            |  



5



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage
Company)

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 11, 1998 (INCEPTION) TO SEPTEMBER 30,
2006



|                                                                                     |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | - | ------ | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | - |  | ------------ | --- | --------------- |  | - | ----------------------------------- |  | - | ---------------------------- |  | - | ------ | - |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                     |  | Date |   |        | Price Per Equity Unit |  | Preferred Stock Series A, Convertible |   |  | Common Stock |     | Committed Stock |  |   | Additional Paid-In Capital Restated |  |   | Accumulated Deficit Restated |  |   | Total  |  
|                                                                                     |  |      |   | Shares |                       |  | Amount                                |   |  | Shares       |     | Amount          |  |   |                                     | 
|Issuance of common stock for conversion of convertible notes                         |  | (6   | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 1,649,550                           |  |   | 1,650                        |  |   |        |   |  |   | 4,529,550   |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 4,531,200   |  
|conversion of convertible preferred stock                                            |  | (7   | ) |        |                       |  | (28,100                               | ) |  |              | (28 | )               |  |   | 810,000                             |  |   | 810                          |  |   | 2,000  |   |  |   | (2,782      | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Interest on benefit conversion feature                                               |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 2,050,000   |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 2,050,000   |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                                               |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 79,177      |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 79,177      |  
|Net loss                                                                             |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | (8,013,479  | ) |  |   | (8,013,479  | )
|                                                                                     |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2004                                                           |  |      |   |        |                       |  | 23,250                                |   |  |              | 23  |                 |  |   | 112,649,650                         |  |   | 112,650                      |  |   | 2,000  |   |  |   | 11,293,919  |   |  |   | (16,791,257 | ) |  |   | (5,382,665  | )
|                                                                                     |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Issuance of common stock for cash                                                    |  | (8   | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 1,725,000                           |  |   | 1,725                        |  |   |        |   |  |   | 14,709,660  |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 14,711,385  |  
|Conversion of convertible notes                                                      |  | (6   | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 4,228,000                           |  |   | 4,228                        |  |   |        |   |  |   | 10,326,773  |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 10,331,001  |  
|Conversion of convertible preferred stock                                            |  | (7   | ) |        |                       |  | (23,250                               | ) |  |              | (23 | )               |  |   | 4,325,000                           |  |   | 4,325                        |  |   | (2,000 | ) |  |   | (2,303      | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   | (1          | )
|Exercise of options                                                                  |  | (10  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 123,466                             |  |   | 123                          |  |   |        |   |  |   | 82,880      |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 83,003      |  
|Issuance of warrant for cash                                                         |  | (9   | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 75          |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 75          |  
|Issuance of stock options for services                                               |  | (11  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 1,812,010   |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 1,812,010   |  
|Warrants exercised                                                                   |  | (12  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 848,482                             |  |   | 848                          |  |   |        |   |  |   | (848        | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss                                                                             |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | (12,365,921 | ) |  |   | (12,365,921 | )
|                                                                                     |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2005                                                           |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                      |   |  | $            |    |                 |  |   | 123,899,598                         |  | $ | 123,899                      |  | $ |       |   |  | $ | 38,222,166  |   |  | $ | (29,157,178 | ) |  | $ | 9,188,887   |  
|                                                                                     |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Warrants exercised                                                                   |  | (12  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 89,116                              |  |   | 89                           |  |   |        |   |  |   | (86         | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   | 3           |  
|Exercise of options                                                                  |  | (10  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 265,000                             |  |   | 265                          |  |   |        |   |  |   | 129,235     |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 129,500     |  
|Issuance of stock for services                                                       |  | (13  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 20                                  |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 122         |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 122         |  
|Conversion of convertible notes                                                      |  | (6   | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   | 82,500                              |  |   | 83                           |  |   | 28     |   |  |   | 303,189     |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 303,300     |  
|Option and warrant derivatives                                                       |  | (13  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | (12,209,055 | ) |  |   |             |   |  |   | (12,209,055 | )
|Stock based compensation                                                             |  | (11  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 368,541     |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 368,541     |  
|Reclassification of Conversion and interest conversion derivative on note conversion |  | (16  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 206,733     |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 206,733     |  
|Reclassification of Interest conversion derivative on actual interest paid           |  | (15  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 116,206     |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 116,206     |  
|Reclassification of option derivative for options exercise                           |  | (17  | ) |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   | 1,074,000   |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 1,074,000   |  
|Net loss (unaudited)                                                                 |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   | 89,214      |   |  |   | 89,214      |  
|                                                                                     |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Balance, September 30, 2006 (Restated)                                               |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                      |   |  | $            |    |                 |  | $ | 124,336,234                         |  | $ | 124,336                      |  | $ | 28     |   |  | $ | 28,211,051  |   |  | $ | (29,067,964 | ) |  | $ | (732,549    | )
|                                                                                     |  |      |   |        |                       |  |                                       |   |  |              |     |                 |  |   |                                     |  |   |                              |  |   |        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  

---

|(1) | Multiple transactions valued at the per share price in the year ended December 31, 1998
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Multiple transactions valued at the per share price in the year ended December 31, 1999
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Multiple transactions valued at the per share price in the year ended December 31, 2000
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Preferred stock converted to common stock
|--- | -----------------------------------------

|(5) | Offering costs
|--- | --------------

|(6) | Multiple transactions at $2.00 and $4.00 in the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Multiple transactions at 100:1 conversion rate in the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | Public offering of 1,725,000 common shares at $10.00 per share
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------

|(9) | Underwriters warrants sold with the public offering
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------

|(10) | Multiple employee option exercises (exercise price range $0.30- $2.00)
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

|(11) | Stock options to directors and employees
|---- | ----------------------------------------

|(12) | Warrants exercised (exercise price $0.80)
|---- | -----------------------------------------

|(13) | Reclassification of option and warrant derivatives from equity to liability in accordance with EITF00-19
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(14) | Issuance of 20 commemorative shares to directors and executives
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

|(15) | Reclassification of Interest conversion derivative from liability to equity on interest paid in cash
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(16) | Reclassification of Adjustment to embedded derivatives, conversion and interest conversion feature, from liability to equity for conversion of notes and interest related to those
notes to common stock
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(17) | Reclassification of option derivative from liability to equity for options exercised
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Formerly CARDIOVASCULAR GENETIC ENGINEERING, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005, AND 2006 AND FOR

THE PERIOD FROM MARCH 11, 1998 (INCEPTION) TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 (UNAUDITED)



|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -- | - |  | ---------------------------------------------- | ----------- | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  | For the Nine Month Periods
Ended September 30, |             |   | For the Period from March 11, 1998 (Inception) to September 30, 2006 Restated |  
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  | 2005 (Unaudited)                               |             |   | 2006 Restated (unaudited)                                                     |   |            
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                       |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net loss                                                                    |  |    |   |  | $                                              | (10,224,503 | ) |                                                                               | $ | 89,214      |   |  | $ | (29,067,964 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |  | (a | ) |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Depreciation                                                                |  |    |   |  |                                                | 8,937       |   |                                                                               |   | 92,284      |   |  |   | 112,520     |  
|Amortization of beneficial conversion feature                               |  |    |   |  |                                                | 710,001     |   |                                                                               |   |            |   |  |   | 2,050,000   |  
|Amortization of deferred debt financing costs                               |  |    |   |  |                                                | 712,664     |   |                                                                               |   | 273,214     |   |  |   | 2,408,929   |  
|Debt and Interest paid with common stock                                    |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 7,576       |   |  |   | 7,576       |  
|Stock based compensation                                                    |  |    |   |  |                                                | 1,732,698   |   |                                                                               |   | 368,541     |   |  |   | 2,462,801   |  
|Stock issued for services rendered                                          |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 122         |   |  |   | 122         |  
|Warrants issued for services rendered                                       |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 801,250     |   |  |   | 920,994     |  
|Amortization of discount related to warrant derivatives                     |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 419,292     |   |  |   | 419,292     |  
|Amortization of discount related to conversion feature                      |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 871,202     |   |  |   | 871,202     |  
|Amortization of discount related to interest on conversion feature          |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 691,788     |   |  |   | 691,788     |  
|Adjustments to fair value of derivatives                                    |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | (8,632,765  | ) |  |   | (8,632,765  | )
|Adjustments to fair value of derivatives-warrant and option derivatives     |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | (7,998,795  | ) |  |   | (7,998,795  | )
|Equity in loss of unconsolidated investee                                   |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   |            |   |  |   | 15,000      |  
|(Increase) decrease in:                                                     |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Due from an affiliate                                                       |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | (63,312     | ) |  |   | (64,719     | )
|Prepaid expenses                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                | (307,342    | ) |                                                                               |   | (1,581,017  | ) |  |   | (2,030,298  | )
|Other assets                                                                |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | (51,905     | ) |  |   | (93,655     | )
|(Increase) decrease in:                                                     |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Due to affiliate                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 8,033       |   |  |   | 8,033       |  
|Accounts payable                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                | (632,630    | ) |                                                                               |   | 350,843     |   |  |   | 524,606     |  
|Accrued payroll and payroll taxes                                           |  |    |   |  |                                                | 4,337       |   |                                                                               |   | (23,321     | ) |  |   | 102,109     |  
|Accrued interest                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                | (1,187,870  | ) |                                                                               |   | 618,552     |   |  |   | 618,986     |  
|Accrued rent                                                                |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 79,148      |   |  |   | 79,148      |  
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net cash used in operating activities                                       |  | (a | ) |  |                                                | (9,183,708  | ) |                                                                               |   | (13,680,056 | ) |  |   | (36,595,090 | )
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                       |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Purchase of restricted cash                                                 |  |    |   |  |                                                | (41,234     | ) |                                                                               |   | (33,532     | ) |  |   | (170,895    | )
|Purchase of property and equipment                                          |  |    |   |  |                                                | (68,501     | ) |                                                                               |   | (578,427    | ) |  |   | (797,786    | )
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net cash (used in) investing activities                                     |  | (b | ) |  |                                                | (109,735    | ) |                                                                               |   | (611,959    | ) |  |   | (968,681    | )
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Cash flows from financing activities                                        |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net proceeds from sale of common stock                                      |  |    |   |  |                                                | 15,547,972  |   |                                                                               |   |            |   |  |   | 19,451,972  |  
|Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants                              |  |    |   |  |                                                | 83,003      |   |                                                                               |   | 129,503     |   |  |   | 212,506     |  
|Proceeds from sale of preferred stock                                       |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   |            |   |  |   | 520,400     |  
|Proceeds from issuance of notes payables                                    |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   |            |   |  |   | 14,092,200  |  
|Deferred debt financing cost                                                |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | (1,648,002  | ) |  |   | (3,783,715  | )
|Proceeds from notes payable issued under Reg D                              |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   | 20,000,000  |   |  |   | 20,800,000  |  
|Cash paid for deferred offering costs                                       |  |    |   |  |                                                |            |   |                                                                               |   |            |   |  |   | (865,516    | )
|Due to net increase (decrease) in affiliates                                |  |    |   |  |                                                | (522,719    | ) |                                                                               |   |            |   |  |   |            |  
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net cash provided by financing activities                                   |  | (c | ) |  |                                                | 15,108,256  |   |                                                                               |   | 18,481,501  |   |  |   | 50,427,847  |  
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                            |  |    |   |  |                                                | 5,814,813   |   |                                                                               |   | 4,189,486   |   |  |   | 12,864,076  |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                            |  |    |   |  |                                                | 4,530,221   |   |                                                                               |   | 8,674,590   |   |  |   |            |  
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                  |  |    |   |  | $                                              | 10,345,034  |   |                                                                               | $ | 12,864,076  |   |  | $ | 12,864,076  |  
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Interest paid                                                               |  |    |   |  | $                                              | 1,345,070   |   |                                                                               | $ | 697,491     |   |  | $ | 2,059,126   |  
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|California Franchise Taxes paid                                             |  |    |   |  | $                                              | 600         |   |                                                                               | $ |            |   |  | $ | 6,000       |  
|                                                                            |  |    |   |  |                                                |             |   |                                                                               |   |             |   |  |   |             |  

---

|(a) | Including amount with related parties of $1,196,863, $4,001,033, and $12,523,094, respectively
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Including amount with related parties of $0, $0 and $0, respectively
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Including amount with related parties of $0, ($1,756,975) and ($3,894,095) respectively
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Financing Activities

1) During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006,
the Company issued 0, 0 and 99,750,000 shares of post-split adjusted common stock to founders, respectively.

2) During the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006, the Company issued 0, 0 and 583,000 shares of post-split adjusted common stock for services, respectively.

3) During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006,
the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature in connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable Series II and Series IIa in the amount of $0, $0 and $2,050,000, respectively.

4) During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006,
23,250, 0 and 52,850 shares of convertible preferred stock were converted into 2,325,000, 0, and 5,285,000 shares of common stock, respectively. During the period ended September 30, 2005, 2,000,000 shares of committed common stock relating to
the conversion of preferred shares in fiscal 2004 were issued.

5) During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and
the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006, $10,331,000, $0, and $ 14,862,200 of convertible notes payable were converted into 4,090,000, 0 and 5,739,550 shares of common stock, respectively and 25,000 shares of
committed stock as of September 30, 2005.

6) In March 2006, 100,000 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.80 were exercised on a
cashless basis in exchange for 89,116 shares of common stock. The remaining balance of $3 was paid in cash upon exercise of the warrants on a cashless basis.

7) In May 2006, 20 commemorative shares which had a fair value of $122 were issued to the founders and the executives.

8) During the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006, $0, $295,723, and $295,723 of senior secured convertible notes
payable were converted into 0, 82,500, and 82,500 shares of common stock, respectively, and 28,000 shares of committed common stock. During the period ended September 30, 2006 $7,576 of interest on senior secured convertible notes were paid
with common stock.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The
information contained in this report is unaudited, but in our opinion reflects all adjustments necessary to make the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods a fair presentation of our operations and cash flows. All such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

These financial statements should be
read along with the financial statements and notes that go along with our audited financial statements, as well as other financial information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Financial
presentations for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.

2. RESTATEMENT

The Company has restated its unaudited financial statements as of September 30, 2006 and for the nine months then ended, and the related notes to the
financial statements.

This amendment is to correct an error in identifying certain financial instruments as derivatives in the application
of certain accounting principles related to the issuance of the Companys convertible note financing and the impact of such accounting principles on previously issued and vested non-employee option and warrant transactions in prior periods. The
previously recorded transactions were properly treated as equity transactions at the time of their respective issuances. Upon the sale of the Companys convertible notes on March 20, 2006, as more fully set forth below, accounting practices
require the previously issued and vested non-employee options and warrants to be reclassified as derivative liabilities. The reclassification of previously issued and vested non-employee options and warrants as derivative instruments requires the
Companys financial statements for the period which ended September 30, 2006 to be stated.

The convertible note agreements entered
into on March 20, 2006 and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on March 22, 2006 contain variable share settlement provisions. These provisions require the Company to reclassify, at fair value, previously issued and vested options and
warrants from additional paid in capital to derivative liability accounts on the balance sheet in accordance with EITF 00-19 Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in a Companys Own
Stock (EITF 00-19). The reason for this reclassification is the possibility that the Company may not have enough authorized unissued common stock to meet all of its commitments in the delivery of the Companys common stock to
honor both the contracts related to the convertible notes and the previously issued and vested option and warrant contracts. In order to be in the situation of not having enough unissued shares to deliver to the option and warrant holders, the fair
market value of the common stock of the Company would have to be lower than all of the exercise prices of all the option and warrant contracts. In such case, an option or warrant holder would have to exercise his or her options or warrants at a
price that would require him or her to pay more than the fair market value of the common stock on the open market. Nonetheless, according to EITF 00-19 the previously recorded transactions must be reclassified from equity to liability. In addition,
further analysis indicates the previously issued options and warrants identified as derivative instruments require separate valuation under FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

The purpose of this amendment is to restate, at the fair value, previously issued and vested options and warrants as derivative liabilities as of the
date of issuance of the convertible notes and to adjust fair values as of September 30, 2006 through the Statement of Operations for option and warrant derivatives previously classified in equity, pursuant to EITF 00-19.

The following table shows the impact of these restatements on the financial statements at September 30, 2006:



|                                                                         |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- | ----------- | - | ----------- | - | ----------- | -------------------------- |  | ----------- | -
|                                                                         |  | Previously ReportedSeptember 30, 2006 |             |   | Adjustments |   |             | RestatedSeptember 30, 2006 | 
|BALANCE SHEET                                                            |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|Warrant derivative                                                       |  | $                                     |            |   |             | $ | 662,750     |                            |  | 662,750     |  
|Options derivative                                                       |  |                                       |            |   |             |   | 3,274,760   |                            |  | 3,274,760   |  
|Total Liabilities                                                        |  |                                       | 14,063,736  |   |             |   | 3,937,510   |                            |  | 18,001,246  |  
|Additional paid-in-capital                                               |  |                                       | 39,824,417  |   |             |   | (11,613,366 | )                          |  | 28,211,051  |  
|Deficit accumulated during the development stage                         |  |                                       | (36,743,820 | ) |             |   | 7,675,856   |                            |  | (29,067,964 | )
|Total stockholders equity (deficit)                                     |  |                                       | 3,204,961   |   |             |   | (3,937,510  | )                          |  | (732,549    | )
|STATEMENT OF CASHFLOWS                                                   |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|Adjustment to fair value of derivatives                                  |  |                                       | (8,955,704  | ) |             |   | 322,939     |                            |  | (8,632,765  | )
|Adjustment to fair value of derivatives - warrant and option derivatives |  |                                       |            |   |             |   | (7,998,795  | )                          |  | (7,998,795  | )
|For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006                       |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS                                                  |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|Adjustment to fair value of derivatives                                  |  |                                       | 8,955,704   |   |             |   | (322,939    | )                          |  | 8,632,765   |  
|Adjustment to fair value of derivatives - warrant and option derivatives |  |                                       |            |   |             |   | 7,998,795   |                            |  | 7,998,795   |  
|Net loss (income)                                                        |  |                                       | (7,586,642  | ) |             |   | 7,675,856   |                            |  | 89,214      |  
|Loss per share                                                           |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|Basic loss per share                                                     |  |                                       | (0.06       | ) |             |   | 0.06        |                            |  | 0.00        |  
|Diluted loss per share                                                   |  |                                       | (0.06       | ) |             |   | 0.06        |                            |  | 0.00        |  
|Shares used to calculate loss per share                                  |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|Basic earnings (loss) per share                                          |  |                                       | 123,989,030 |   |             |   | 40,535      |                            |  | 124,029,565 |  
|Diluted earnings (loss) per share                                        |  |                                       | 123,989,030 |   |             |   | 3,140,171   |                            |  | 127,129,201 |  
|For the three month period ended September 30, 2006                      |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS                                                  |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|Adjustment to fair value of derivatives                                  |  |                                       | 5,208,897   |   |             |   | (267,620    | )                          |  | 4,941,277   |  
|Adjustment to fair value of derivatives - warrant and option derivatives |  |                                       |            |   |             |   | 3,058,920   |                            |  | 3,058,920   |  
|Net loss (income)                                                        |  |                                       | (1,066,755  | ) |             |   | 2,791,300   |                            |  | 1,724,545   |  
|Loss per share                                                           |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|Basic loss per share                                                     |  |                                       | (0.01       | ) |             |   | 0.02        |                            |  | 0.01        |  
|Diluted loss per share                                                   |  |                                       | (0.01       | ) |             |   | 0.02        |                            |  | 0.01        |  
|Shares used to calculate loss per share                                  |  |                                       |             |   |             |   |             |                            |  |             |  
|Basic loss per share                                                     |  |                                       | 124,081,534 |   |             |   | -           |                            |  | 124,081,534 |  
|Diluted loss per share                                                   |  |                                       | 124,081,534 |   |             |   | 3,099,637   |                            |  | 127,181,171 |  

The Company has restated its unaudited financial statements as of Sept, 30, 2006 and for the
nine months then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements.

3. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (formerly CardioVascular Genetic Engineering, Inc.) (Cardio) or (the Company) is a
development stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and marketing protein drug candidates that are designed to be used in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cardio was incorporated in Delaware on March 11, 1998
(Inception) as CardioVascular Genetic Engineering, Inc. and in February 2004, changed its name to CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. Since inception Cardio has been engaged in research and development activities associated with
bringing its products to market.

4. TRANSACTIONS AND CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH AFFILIATED ENTITIES

Cardio is a member of an affiliated group through common management that includes Phage Biotechnology Corporation (Phage), Cardio Phage
International (CPI), Sribna Culya Biopharmaceuticals Inc. (Sribna), Proteomics Biopharmaceuticals Technologies Inc. (Proteomics), Zhittya Stem Cell Medical Research Company Inc. (Zhittya), Qure
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Qure), known collectively as the (affiliates). The common management of Cardio and Phage spend a sufficient amount of their time with Cardio and Phage to satisfy the needs for Cardio and Phage the
remaining balance to other interests.

Daniel C. Montano, John W. Jacobs and Mickael A. Flaa are, respectively, Chairman of the Board/Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer/Chief Scientific Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of both Cardio and Phage. Upon completion of the public offering, Mr. Flaa and Dr. Jacobs joined Cardios Board of Directors. Daniel C.
Montano is a principal stockholder in Cardio, Phage, Proteomics, Zhittya, and Qure. Daniel C. Montano, Dr. Thomas Stegmann and Dr. Jacobs are members of the Board of Directors of CPI. Mr. Grant Gordon, one of the Companys
current Board members, is a member of the Board of Directors of CPI and is CPIs President. Mr. Flaa, one of the Companys current Board members and the Companys CFO, is CPIs CFO.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

The following are
or were the business activities performed by each affiliate:

Active Companies:



| |  |  | Phage is a developer of recombinant protein pharmaceuticals; certain of the Companys officers and directors control 27% and the Company controls 4.32% of the
common stock of Phage;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | CPI is a distributor for the future products for both Cardio and Phage in locations throughout the world other than United States and Canada, Europe, Japan, and,
with respect to Cardio only, the Republic of Korea, China, and Taiwan. Cardio and Phage each own approximately 43% of CPI and each is able to appoint 43% of CPIs directors;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inactive Companies:



| |  |  | Sribna was developing a treatment for cancer utilizing cancer cell apoptosis (currently inactive);
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Proteomics was developing a non-injection method for medical protein (currently inactive);
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Zhittya was researching adult stem cells (currently inactive); and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Qure was developing commercial medical applications (currently inactive). Qure owns less than 1% of the Companys common stock.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

During the period from 1999 through 2001, the Company entered into transactions with these entities affiliated with the Companys CEO
(Proteomics, Zhittya, Qure and Sribna). These companies paid expenses on behalf of the Company aggregating $187,600. That amount was repaid without interest. These entities are all currently inactive. Additionally, Qure owns 630,000 shares of common
stock of the Company.

In 2006, the Company became a co-sponsor of the Regenerative Medicine Organization, a non profit educational
organization that focuses on providing information and education to the healthcare community and the public about regenerative medicine.

License
Agreement

Cardio has a Joint Patent Ownership and License Agreement with Phage.
Under that agreement, Cardio and Phage each own an undivided one half interest in the U.S. and foreign patent rights necessary to develop and commercialize Cardios drug candidates, each of which are formulated with Cardio
Vascu-GrowTMas its active ingredient, and Phage agrees to provide certain technical development services to Cardio
and to manufacture Cardios drug candidates for Cardios clinical trials at cost. Any product Phage manufactures for Cardio commercialization purposes is paid for on a percentage of sales basis as defined in the agreement. This agreement
obligates Cardio, at its option, to either (i) pay Phage ten percent of net sales for its drugs manufactured for Cardio by Phage or (ii) pay Phage a six percent royalty based on Cardios net sales price of its drugs that Phage does
not manufacture for Cardio. This agreement expires on the last to expire of the patent rights covered, including extensions.

Currently it
is the Companys intention to contract with Phage for manufacturing of its drug candidates for the ongoing FDA trials and for further commercial production. However, Cardio has the right to and may choose to use a third party for manufacturing
and is exploring additional contract manufacturers for its drug candidates. As of September 30, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio had cash and restricted cash of $13,034,971 indicating that the Company has sufficient funds to be a viable entity on an
ongoing basis should it choose to use a third party manufacturer.

Phage has manufactured drugs for Cardio in the United States clinical
trials to date and may manufacture them for subsequent trials and commercial production. To date Phage has manufactured three drugs that have been authorized by the FDA to be administered to humans in clinical trials, indicating Phage is capable of
manufacturing drug products to acceptable standards for clinical trials.

Furthermore, Cardio paid Phage for technical development services
and for manufacture of its drug candidates for clinical trials, which, pursuant to the agreement, Phage provided to Cardio at cost. For the nine months September 30, 2005 (unaudited), and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998
(inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited) payments to Phage relating to such services were $415,337, $1,820,227 and $3,383,232, respectively.

Administrative Support

Phage has provided Cardio with administrative support in Phages research facility and billed
Cardio for Phages actual costs incurred plus Cardios pro-rata share (based on costs



10



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

incurred for Cardio as compared to
total Phage overhead costs) of Phages overhead costs. Payments to Phage for such support for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to
September 30, 2006 (unaudited) were $148,507, $121,575 and $1,137,033, respectively.

Distribution Agreement

Cardio and Phage have entered into a distribution agreement with CPI, a Bahamian company, to handle future distribution of Cardio drugs and any other
products licensed to CPI when available for commercial distribution. CPIs territory is limited to areas other than the United States, Canada, Europe (defined as the Ural Mountains west including Iceland, excluding Turkey and Cyprus), Japan
and, with respect to Cardio only, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of China and Taiwan. Phage and Cardio each own approximately 43% of the CPI outstanding stock and the companies have the right to each appoint 43% of the CPI board. Cardio has
made no payments to CPI and does not anticipate making any payments in the near future.

As of December 31, 2003, the Company
accounted for its 43% interest in Cardio Phage International (CPI) under the equity method. As of December 31, 2004, the Companys statement of operations includes a loss of $15,000, which represents the Companys equity in loss on
its investment in CPI. The loss reduced the Companys investment in CPI to zero and, as a consequence, CPIs ongoing operations will not negatively affect the Companys future financial results. The Company has no obligation to fund
future operating losses nor has any guarantees on any of CPIs obligations. There is no material difference between Cardios carrying value for CPI and underlying equity in CPIs net assets. There is no quoted market price for
CPIs net assets. There is no quoted market price for CPIs shares.

Royalty Agreement

Cardio has entered into an agreement with Dr. Thomas Stegmann, one of the Companys directors, Co-President and Chief Clinical Officer, whereby
Cardio will pay Dr. Stegmann a royalty of one percent of the Companys net revenue (as defined) from commercial sales of Cardio drugs in exchange for rights granted to Cardio to utilize the results of Dr. Stegmanns German
clinical trials. This agreement terminates on December 31, 2013. Cardio has made no payments to Dr. Stegmann under this agreement.

Asia
Distribution Agreement

On December 15, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Korea Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd.
(KBDC) to commercialize Cardios future products. Cardio transferred to KBDC the rights to manufacture and sell its products for 99 years in all of Korea, China, and Taiwan. In exchange, KBDC arranged the purchase of 8,750,000
shares of Cardios common stock for $3,602,000. KBDC agreed to fund all of the regulatory approval process in Korea for any Cardio products. In addition, KBDC agreed to pay a royalty of 10% of net revenues to Cardio. KBDC will pay the royalties
for the life of the agreement. Daniel C. Montano, the Companys Chairman, owns 17% of KBDC and is a former member of its board of directors. KBDC invested $200,000 in each of Sribna, Proteomics and Zhittya and invested $60,000 in CPI.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Guarantee of Rental Agreements
for Phage

Cardio entered into a Standard Lease Guaranty (the Lease Guaranty) dated March 15, 2006 with Canta Rana
Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership and Phage, (the Lease Agreement). Phage is an affiliated private biotechnology company that manufactures recombinant protein drugs and is the Companys sole supplier of drug products.
Pursuant to the Lease Guaranty, the Company guarantees full performance of all of Phages obligations under the Lease Agreement.

In exchange for the Companys guarantee of the Lease Agreement, Phage entered into an
Indemnity and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006. Phage will pay the Company certain fees payable on the first day of each calendar month that will be the sum of the following amounts (collectively, Guaranty Fees):
(a) one-tenth (1/10th) of one percent (1%) of the remaining aggregate amount of the Minimum Monthly
Rent due under the Lease Agreement from the period from May 1, 2006 to the Expiration Date of the Lease Agreement; and (b) one-tenth (1/10th) of one percent (1%) of the remaining aggregate amount of Additional Rent due under the Lease Agreement following the payment of Additional Rent. Any amount of Guaranty Fees not paid by
Phage on the first calendar day of each month shall accrue interest at the lesser of twelve percent (12%) per annum or the maximum rate allowable by law until paid.

If Phage defaults on payment of the Minimum Monthly Rent or the Additional Rent, which monthly payments aggregate approximately $20,000, the Company is obligated pursuant to the Lease Guaranty to pay to the lessor the
rents in default. The Companys maximum contingent liability is approximately $1,737,329 as of September 30, 2006 and will decrease by approximately $20,000 per month as Minimum Monthly Rent and the Additional Rent are paid by Phage.

Phage has indemnified the Company for any amounts required to be paid by the Company pursuant to the Lease Guaranty in the Indemnity and
Reimbursement Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006.

The lease guarantee is irrevocably released when Phage provides to Canta Rana
Ranch, L.P. a bank statement showing a balance of $5,000,000.

During August 2004, the Company guaranteed Phages obligations under a
non-cancelable operating lease for laboratory and office space at University of California Irvine Research Center. The lease was for 11,091 rentable square feet for the period March 1, 2004 through August 31, 2006, and provided for a
monthly rent of approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses. During 2004 and 2005, the Company subleased space from Phage for approximately $2,800 per month as part of the agreement for administrative services. The lease term
expired September 30, 2006 without any event of default. The companys guarantee expired along with the expiration of the lease.

Guaranty
from Daniel C. Montano

On March 20, 2006, Daniel C. Montano, the Companys Chairman, Co-President and CEO, entered into a
Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all obligations of the Company resulting from the sale on March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the later of March 20, 2007
or the first date on which the Company receives revenue from sale of drugs in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient after such drug has been approved by the FDA, provided that on such date the Company is not in default of any
provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate upon the payment in full of the notes including
conversion of the notes into the Companys common stock.

After the Companys obligations contained in the agreements for the
senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano was required to make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, the Company will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such
payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the date reimbursed by the Company.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

5. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Development Stage Enterprise

The Company is a development stage company as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises. The Company is
devoting substantially all of its present efforts to its formation, fundraising, and product development and approval. Its planned principal operations of selling its pharmaceutical products have not yet commenced. For the period from March 11,
1998 (inception) through September 30, 2006 (unaudited), the Company has accumulated a deficit of $29,067,964. There can be no assurance that the Company will have sufficient funds available to complete its research and development programs or
be able to commercially manufacture or market any products in the future, that future revenue will be significant, or that any sales will be profitable. The Company expects operating losses to increase for at least the next several years due
principally to the anticipated expenses associated with the proposed product development, clinical trials and various research and development activities.

Stock Split

In February 2004, the Board of Directors approved, with the approval of the shareholders, a forward 100-to-1
common stock split. The accompanying financial statements and notes to the financial statements have been retrospectively restated to reflect this split.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management
makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates relate to compensation expense for options, warrants and common stock issued for services.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of cash flow, the Company considers all
highly liquid investments purchased with original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Restricted cash

As of December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006 (unaudited), the restricted cash consists of $137,363 and $170,895, respectively. The restricted cash is
required as collateral for the Companys credit card holders.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of the related asset, which management believes is 3 to 5 years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, whereas major betterments and renewals are capitalized.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Deferred Rent

The Company accounts for property leases with escalation provisions and tenant improvement allowances on a straight line basis, resulting in a
consistent charge to the statement of operations over the life of the lease. In the early years of the lease, the Company recognizes a liability for excess straight line amounts over the actual rent paid. This liability begins to reduce in the later
years of the lease.

Income Taxes

The
Company utilizes SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements
or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted
tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For certain of the Companys financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and
accrued compensation, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

Valuation of Derivative Instruments

FAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments
and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing Formula (the Black-Scholes Model). Derivative liabilities are adjusted to
reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as
warrants are valued using Black-Scholes Models.

Research and Development Costs

The Company accounts for research and development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs.
Research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred. Research and development costs consist of expenses incurred by third party consultants, contractors, clinical research organizations, and suppliers in support of preclinical
research and FDA clinical trials.

Non-monetary Transactions

Common stock issued for goods or services is recorded at estimated market value of the common stock issued or the services performed, whichever is more readily determinable.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs incurred in
connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable are capitalized as deferred debt financing costs. These costs primarily include commissions paid to the placement agent and are amortized over



14



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

the term of the convertible notes
on a straight line basis. At September 30, 2005, there was none of these costs and $1,648,002 at September 30, 2006 (unaudited) which includes deferred cost of $117,965 associated with pending stock exchange admission. During the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006, the Company amortized $712,664, and $273,214, and $2,408,929.

Marketing Expense

The company has been engaged in an marketing
program consisting of corporate recognition and image development within the medical and medical reimbursement industries. Marketing and advertising expenses are recognized as they occur in accordance with SOP 93-7. During the nine month ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005 marketing expenses totaled $2,649,000 and $1,311,000.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company places its cash and cash equivalent with high quality financial institutions, and at times they may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation $100,000 insurance limit. As of December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006 (unaudited), uninsured portions of cash amounted to $8,596,051 and $12,834,970 respectively.

Earnings/Loss per Share

The Company calculates loss
per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Basic earnings/loss per share is computed by dividing the earnings/loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings/loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued
and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

The following potential common shares have been included from the computation of
diluted net loss per share for the period ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) since their effect would have been anti-dilutive:



|                          |  |                  |  |                  
|------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | -----------------
|                          |  | December 31,2005 |  | September 30,2006
|Stock options             |  | 3,161,000        |  | 2,378,686        
|Warrants                  |  | 375,000          |  | 109,091          
|Convertible notes payable |  |                 |  | 611,860          

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R) (revised 2004), Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)). SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes our previous accounting under SFAS 123 for
periods beginning in fiscal 2006. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to SFAS 123(R). The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS
123(R). The Company has used the Black-Scholes Model formula to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to employees and consultants since its inception, and therefore this method represents no significant change in the Companys
accounting for options and warrant issuances.

SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards to
employees and directors on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the Companys Statements of
Operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the method as allowed under SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123).



15



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

The Company
adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. Based on the terms of its plans, the Company did not have a cumulative effect related to its
plans. The Company also elected to continue to estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes Model. Since the Companys policy has always been to expense the issuance of options using the fair value based method using the
Black-Scholes Model, there is no difference in the basic and diluted loss per share.

During the nine month period ended September 30,
2005 the Company issued 550,500 options with an exercise price of $10.00 to employees and directors from the 2004 Stock Plan. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123(R) for employees and directors for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006 was $1,732,698 and $368,541, respectively. The estimated fair value of options granted to employees and directors during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $264,796.

The estimated fair value of options granted to employees and during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was $11,272. Assumptions used to value the
options granted were expected volatility of 77%, risk-free interest rate of 4.57%, weighted average expected lives of 5 years and expected dividend yield of zero.

The estimated fair value of options granted to employees and during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $13,270. Assumptions used to value the options granted were expected volatility of 79%, risk-free interest
rate of 5.125%, weighted average expected lives of 5 years and expected dividend yield of zero.

The estimated fair value of options
granted to employees and directors during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 was $240,254. Assumptions used to value the options granted were expected volatility of 76%, risk-free interest rate of 4.785%, weighted average expected lives of 5
years and expected dividend yield of zero.

The Company determined the fair value of share-based payment awards to employees and directors
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Model, which is affected by the Companys stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to the Company
expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards. Prior to 2006, when valuing awards, the Company used the Awards contractual term as a proxy for its expected terms. For new grants after December 31, 2005, the Company estimated
expected term using the safe harbor provisions provided in SAB 107. The Company used historical data to estimate forfeitures, of which the Company estimated to be none.

The Company has elected to adopt the detailed method provided in SFAS 123(R) for calculating the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool
(APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Statements of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding
upon adoption of SFAS 123(R).



16



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets (SFAS
NO. 156), which provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Statement (1) requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an
obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations; (2) requires that a separately recognized servicing asset or servicing liability be initially measured at fair value, if practicable;
(3) permits an entity to choose either the amortization method or the fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of separately recognized servicing assets or servicing liabilities; (4) permits at initial adoption a
one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities by an entity with recognized servicing rights, provided the securities reclassified offset the entitys exposure to changes in the fair value of the servicing
assets or liabilities; and (5) requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the balance sheet and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted in
certain circumstances. The Statement also describes the manner in which it should be initially applied. The Company does not believe that SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes  An Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return that results in a tax benefit.
Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on de-recognition, income statement classification of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the application of FIN 48 will have on its results of operations and financial condition.

In September, 2006, FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, was issued by the FASB. This new standard provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The FASB believes the
standard also responds to investors requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on
earnings. Statement 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. Currently, over 40 accounting standards within GAAP
require (or permit) entities to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. Prior to Statement 157, the methods for measuring fair value were diverse and inconsistent, especially for items that are not actively traded. The standard clarifies that
for items that are not actively traded, such as certain kinds of derivatives, fair value should reflect the price in a transaction with a market participant, including an adjustment for risk, not just the companys mark-to-model value.
Statement 157 also requires expanded disclosure of the effect on earnings for items measured using unobservable data. Under Statement 157, fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. In this standard, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing
the asset or liability. In support of this principle, Statement 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The Company is evaluating how SFAS 157 will impact its results of operation
and financial position.

In September, 2006, Staff Accounting Bulletin issued Interpretation No. 108. This new standard provides
guidance the process of qualifying financial statement misstatements. The staff is aware of diversity in practice. For example, certain registrants do not consider the effects of prior year errors on current financial statements, thereby allowing
improper assets or liabilities to remain unadjusted. While these errors may not be material if considered only in relation to the balance sheet, correcting the errors could be material to the current year income statement. Certain registrants have
proposed to the staff that allowing these errors to remain on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities in perpetuity is an appropriate application of generally accepted accounting principles. The staff believes that approach is not in the best
interest of the users of financial statements. The interpretations in this Staff Accounting Bulletin are being issued to address diversity in practice in qualifying financial statement misstatements and the potential under current practice for the
build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet. The Company has adopted this principal to address the qualified financial misstatements and prior period errors.



6. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENT AND RESTRICTED CASH

Cash, cash equivalent and restricted cash consisted of the following at December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006 (unaudited):



|                |  |                  |           |                    |   |           
|--------------- |  | ---------------- | --------- | ------------------ | - | ----------
|                |  | December 31,2005 |           | September 30, 2006
|Cash in bank    |  | $                | 8,674,590 |                    | $ | 12,864,076
|Restricted cash |  |                  | 137,363   |                    |   | 170,895   
|                |  |                  |           |                    |   |           
|Total           |  | $                | 8,811,953 |                    | $ | 13,034,971
|                |  |                  |           |                    |   |           



17



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

NOTE 7. PREPAID AND OTHER
CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaid and other assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006 (unaudited):

|                                               |  |                   |         |                    |   |          
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | ------------------ | - | ---------
|                                               |  | December 31, 2005 |         | September 30, 2006
|Prepaid clinical trial costs (a)               |  | $                 | 203,834 |                    | $ | 875,801  
|Prepaid clinical trial costsrelated party (b) |  |                   |        |                    |   | 396,000  
|Prepaid insurance (c)                          |  |                   | 71,726  |                    |   | 188,260  
|Prepaid professional and legal fees (d)        |  |                   | 60,652  |                    |   | 320,394  
|Prepaid trade shows (e)                        |  |                   | 84,593  |                    |   | 88,935   
|Prepaid and current assets (other) (f)         |  |                   | 28,476  |                    |   | 160,908  
|                                               |  |                   |         |                    |   |          
|Total                                          |  | $                 | 449,281 |                    | $ | 2,030,298
|                                               |  |                   |         |                    |   |          

Prepaid expenses at September 30 2006 include:



|(a) | Includes prepaid amounts associated with clinical trials conducted by contractors including: bioRasi, Catheter, Perry Scientific, and Charles River. The balance includes $772,236
paid to Charles River Laboratories for clinical trials. These amounts are to be applied against the final invoices and will be recognized in our statement of operations as Research and Development upon the completion of these trials.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Amounts paid to Phage Biotechnology a related party. In August 2006, the Company requested Phage conduct the pack-and-fill of the drug product for the PAD Phase I clinical trial.
The Company agreed to have Phage conduct the pack-and-fill provided Phage does not exceed the amount of the third-party proposal we received. The total project cost is estimated to be $528,000. The Company has paid $396,000 to Phage for this project
as of December 31, 2006. Phage has performed per the Companys contract and is waiting for delivery instructions from the Company. We will recognize this expense in our statement of operations as research and development upon
transfer of the goods in 2007.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Includes prepaid insurance associated with directors and officers which is amortized over a 12 month period to our statement of operations as general and administrative
expense (includes $255,000 insurance payment in February 2006).
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(d) | Includes prepaid amounts associated with investor relations programs, SEC Counsel, research and development studies, tax advisory services, and legal retainer fees. Legal
prepayments are retainer amounts required by our legal providers to initiate services. These retainers remain recorded as prepaid until the relationship or the project is completed; at that time these retainers will be recognized in our
statement of operations as legal expense ($238,000 was expensed in January 2007, $35,000 is amortized over one year period, and the remaining balance will be expensed upon termination of the contract).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(e) | Includes prepaid amounts associated with trade shows in San Francisco, London, Florida, and Washington D.C. These items will be recognized in our statement of operations
as general and administrative expense as they occur.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(f) | Includes $47,704 of prepaid investor relations; $26,647 of office rent for October 2006. Include other prepaid associated with advertising, office expenses, and $18,659 is for move
expenses paid to employees who moved to Las Vegas from California and is being amortized over 24 months. If one of the employees were to leave the company over the 24 month period they would be liable for the unamortized amount. These items will be
recognized in our statement of operations as general and administrative expense as they occur.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prepaid expenses
at December 31, 2005 include:



|(a) | Includes prepaid amounts associated with clinical trials conducted by contractors including: Touchstone Research, bioRasi, Catheter and Disposables Technology, Inc. These amounts
are to be applied against the final invoices and will be recognized in our Statement of Operations as Research and Development upon the completion of these trials.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Includes prepaid insurance associated with directors and officers which is amortized over a 12 month period to our Statement of Operations as general and administrative
expense.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Includes prepaid insurance associated with professional fees paid to Lord Bissel Brook and Baker and McKenzie.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(d) | Includes prepaid amounts associated with trade shows in San Francisco, London, Florida, and Washington D.C. These items will be recognized in our Statement of Operations
as general and administrative expense as they occur.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(e) | This is prepaid software which we will capitalize as Property and Equipment upon installation.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8. PROPERTY

Property and equipment consisted of the
following:



|                                                       |  |                  |         |   |                   |   |          |  
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------- | ------- | - | ----------------- | - | -------- | -
|                                                       |  | December 31,2005 |         |   | September 30,2006 |  
|Furniture, fixtures, computer software, and equipment  |  | $                | 166,443 |   |                   | $ | 463,994  |  
|Scientific equipment                                   |  |                  | 46,890  |   |                   |   | 85,526   |  
|Leasehold Improvements                                 |  |                  |        |   |                   |   | 242,240  |  
|Less accumulated depreciation                          |  |                  | (14,210 | ) |                   |   | (106,494 | )
|                                                       |  |                  |         |   |                   |   |          |  
|Property and equipment net of accumulated depreciation |  | $                | 199,123 |   |                   | $ | 685,266  |  
|                                                       |  |                  |         |   |                   |   |          |  

Depreciation expense for the periods ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006
(unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited) were $8,937, $92,284 and $106,494, respectively.

9. DUE TO AND FROM AFFILIATES

Due to/from affiliates at December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006 (unaudited)
consisted of the following:



|               |  |                  |       |                   |   |        |  
|-------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | ----------------- | - | ------ | -
|               |  | December 31,2005 |       | September 30,2006 |  
|Due to Phage   |  | $                |      |                   | $ | (8,033 | )
|Due from Phage |  |                  | 1,407 |                   |   | 64,719 |  
|               |  |                  |       |                   |   |        |  
|Total          |  | $                | 1,407 |                   | $ | 56,686 |  
|               |  |                  |       |                   |   |        |  

10. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

Convertible Senior Secured Notes

On March 20, 2006, the Company entered into a Securities
Purchase Agreement with accredited investors for the issuance of an aggregate of $20,000,000 principal amount of convertible notes with offering costs of $1,553,000 representing approximately 7.8%. In connection with the closing of the sale of the
notes, the Company received net proceeds of $18,447,000. The convertible notes are convertible at the option of the holders into 1,666,666 shares of common stock based on a fixed conversion price of $12.00 per share (the Fixed Conversion
Price) subject to anti-dilution and other customary adjustments. However, the notes are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of the average of the preceding five days weighted average trading price, if the result is lower
than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into the Companys common stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no more than 10% of the original $20,000,000 note balance per month. The notes mature in March
2009, and bear a resetting floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 7%. Substantially all of the Companys assets secure the notes.

In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 705,882 shares of our common stock. The term of the warrants is three years and may be exercised anytime up to March 2009.
The warrant exercise price is $8.50 per share.

During the third quarter of 2006, note holders converted an aggregate principal amount and
related interest of $295,723 of their convertible senior secured notes to 110,500 shares of the Companys common stock for an average share price of $2.76 (including 28,000 committed shares). During the nine month period ended
September 30, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006, $0, $7,576, and $7,576 of interest on senior secured convertible notes were paid with common stock.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

The Company sold
the notes under the exemption from registration pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (Regulation D). The Company subsequently registered the Notes on a Form S-3 registration statement with an effective
date of June 12, 2006.

The Company will incur certain penalties if it fails to file and obtain and maintain the effectiveness of a
registration statement covering the notes and warrants (collectively the Securities), such as cash payments to the note holders calculated under formulas based on the principal amount of the notes and aggregate exercise price of the
warrants. The Company may also incur cash damages if the Company fails to issue and deliver certificates of its common stock in a timely manner upon receipt of a notice from a note holder to convert all or a portion of the note holders note.
The Company may also be required to redeem all or a portion of the principal amount of a note in the event a conversion fails. Under certain triggering events, the Company may be required to redeem all or a portion of the principal amount of a note
in the sum of 120% of the principal plus applicable interest. Examples of triggering events are: (i) delisting of the Companys securities; (ii) failure of a registration statement to be filed; (iii) failure of a registration
statement to become effective; and (iv) other triggering events. Other terms and conditions that are material to the Company are: (i) after a triggering event the holder of a note has the option to require the Company to pay a redemption
price at the option of a note holder; (ii) a redemption in the event of a change in control at the option of a note holder, (iii) certain events of default; and (iv) the acceleration of payment of a note upon the occurrence of an
event of default.

From March 20, 2006 until the first date on which there are no notes outstanding, the Company will have certain
restrictions on the payment of dividends or distributions, whether in cash, stock, equity securities or property, in respect of any capital stock or split, combination or reclassification of any capital stock or issuance or authorization of the
issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for any capital stock or set any record date with respect to any of the foregoing.

In connection with this financing, closing costs of: (i) $200,000 to purchasers of the notes for legal fees relating to transaction, (ii) an investment banking fee in the amount of $1,200,000 to CK
Cooper & Company, a party related to one of the Companys former directors, Alexander G. Montano; and (iii) other expenses related to legal fees in the amount of $153,000. A total of $1,553,000 in transaction fees and expenses
were paid by the Company such that the Company realized net proceeds in the amount of $18,447,000.

The following table summarizes
Convertible note, discount and derivative values outstanding at September 30, 2006:



|                                                                                         |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- | -
|Convertible Notes at face value at March 20, 2006                                        |  | $ | 20,000,000 |  
|Notes converted into common stock                                                        |  |   | (295,723   | )
|                                                                                         |  |   |            |  
|Convertible Notes at face value at September 30, 2006                                    |  |   | 19,704,277 |  
|Discounts on Notes:                                                                      |  |   |            |  
|Embedded derivatives                                                                     |  |   | (8,074,383 | )
|Warrant derivative                                                                       |  |   | (2,383,334 | )
|                                                                                         |  |   |            |  
|Net convertible notes on September 30, 2006                                              |  |   | 9,246,560  |  
|Amortization of discount from derivatives                                                |  |   | 1,861,101  |  
|                                                                                         |  |   |            |  
|Convertible notes at September 30, 2006                                                  |  |   | 11,107,661 |  
|Embedded derivatives at fair value at September 30, 2006                                 |  |   | 1,217,526  |  
|Warrant derivative at fair value at September 30, 2006                                   |  |   | 405,668    |  
|                                                                                         |  |   |            |  
|Net Convertible notes, embedded derivatives and warrant derivative at September 30, 2006 |  | $ | 12,730,855 |  
|                                                                                         |  |   |            |  

The Company is required to revalue the derivatives in each quarter to determine if the values of
these derivatives have changed from period to period, until the notes are redeemed or converted. An increase in value of these derivatives will result in the Company having to record an expense to the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives on the
Statement of Operations. Conversely, a decrease in the value of these derivatives will result in



19



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

the Company having to record
income to the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives on the Statement of Operations. The following table summarizes the Adjustments to Fair Value of Derivatives as of September 30, 2006.



|                                                                           |  |   |           |                                       |   |                                         |   |  |                                    |          |   |                           |   |           |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------------------------- | - | --------------------------------------- | - |  | ---------------------------------- | -------- | - | ------------------------- | - | --------- |  | 
|Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives                                    |  |   |           | Balance March 20, 2006 (closing
date) |   | Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives |   |  | Adjustment toAddtl Paid inCapital |          |   | Balance September 30,2006
|Embedded Derivatives                                                       |  | $ | 8,195,564 |                                       | $ | (6,655,099                              | ) |  | $                                  | (322,939 | ) |                           | $ | 1,217,526
|Warrant Derivative                                                         |  |   | 2,383,334 |                                       |   | (1,977,666                              | ) |  |                                    |         |   |                           |   | 405,668  
|                                                                           |  |   |           |                                       |   |                                         |   |  |                                    |          |   |                           |   |           |  | 
|Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives included in other income (expense) |  |   |           |                                       | $ | (8,632,765                              | ) |  |                                    |          |   |                           |   |          
|                                                                           |  |   |           |                                       |   |                                         |   |  |                                    |          |   |                           |   |           |  | 

Of the total proceeds from the issuance of the notes and warrants, $2,383,334 was allocated
to the free standing warrants associated with the notes based upon the fair value of the warrants. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Model for determining the initial fair value of the warrants were as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%;
(2) expected volatility of 74.6%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.595%, and (4) expected life of 3 years. In accordance with FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, EITF 00-19
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in a Companys Own Stock and EITF 05-04 The Effect of a Liquidated Damages Clause on a Freestanding Financial Instrument Subject to EITF Issue
No. 00-19, the amounts allocated to the warrant represent a derivative liability that has been recorded in the accompanying balance sheet at September 30, 2006. The carrying value of warrant derivatives at September 30, 2006 has been
adjusted to reflect its fair value of $405,668 based upon fair values computed using the Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 77.14%, (3) risk-free
interest rate of 4.875% and (4) expected remaining life of 2.5 years. During the period ended September 30, 2006, a decrease in the fair value of the warrant derivative of $1,977,666 was recorded through results of operations as income to
the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.



|                             |  |   |           |                          |   |                              |  | 
|---------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------------ | - | ---------------------------- |  | 
|Warrant Derivative Liability |  |   |           | Fair ValueMarch 20, 2006 |   | Fair ValueSeptember 30, 2006
|                             |  |   |           | (unaudited)              |   | (unaudited)                 
|Warrant Derivative           |  | $ | 2,383,334 |                          | $ | 405,668                     
|                             |  |   |           |                          |   |                              |  | 

The agreement included other embedded derivatives that required separate valuation in accordance
with the requirements of FAS 133, EITF 05-04 and related accounting literature. The following table summarizes the fair values of embedded derivatives at the transaction date of March 20, 2006 and September 30, 2006, followed by a
description of the valuation methodology utilized to determine fair values:



|                              |  |   |           |                           |   |                               |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | - | --------- | ------------------------- | - | ----------------------------- |  | 
|Embedded Derivative Liability |  |   |           | Fair value March 20, 2006 |   | Fair value September 30, 2006
|                              |  |   |           | (unaudited)               |   | (unaudited)                  
|Conversion Feature            |  | $ | 4,568,164 |                           | $ | 779,963                      
|Interest Conversion Feature   |  |   | 3,627,400 |                           |   | 437,563                      
|                              |  |   |           |                           |   |                               |  | 
|Embedded Derivatives          |  | $ | 8,195,564 |                           | $ | 1,217,526                    
|                              |  |   |           |                           |   |                               |  | 

On March 20, 2006, the fair value of the derivative for the Conversion Feature was determined
to be $4,568,164 using a Black-Scholes Model with the following inputs: (1) The stock and exercise price was based on the maximum conversion price of $12.00 as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected



20



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

volatility of 74.6%,
(3) risk-free interest rate of 4.595%, and (4) expected remaining life of 3.0 years. The carrying value of the conversion feature derivative at September 30, 2006 has been adjusted to reflect its fair value of $779,963
based upon a Black-Scholes Model calculation as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 77.14%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.875%, and (4) expected remaining life of 2.5 years. During the six month ended
September 30, 2006, a decrease in the fair value of the conversion feature liability of $3,788,201 was recorded through results of operations as income to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

On March 20, 2006, the fair value of the derivative for the Interest Conversion Feature was determined to be $3,627,400 using a Black-Scholes Model
with the following inputs: (1) The stock and exercise price was based on the a conversion price on the date of the close of $7.15 as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 74.6%, (3) risk-free interest rate
of 4.595%, and (4) expected remaining life of 3.0 years. The carrying value of warrant derivative at September 30, 2006 has been adjusted to reflect its fair value of $437,563 based upon a Black-Scholes Model calculation as
follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 77.14%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.875%, and (4) expected remaining life of 2.5 years. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease in the
fair value of the interest conversion feature liability of approximately $3,189,837 was recorded through results of operations as income to Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives.

On April 3, 2006, the Company paid interest in cash resulting in a reduction in the embedded interest conversion derivative. An adjustment to additional
paid in capital was made for reduction in fair value of the interest to the interest conversion feature. Using a Black-Scholes Model with the following criteria of the stock price on the date of the payment of $7.80 as follows: (1) dividend yield of
0%; (2) expected volatility of 79.16%; (3) risk-free interest rate of 5.125%; (4) expected remaining life of 2.723 years a decrease in the fair value of the interest conversion derivative liability of $55,319 was recorded to additional paid in
capital.

During the three months ended September 30, 2006, convertible noteholders converted $295,715 of principal in 107,716 shares of
common stock and $7,583 of accrued interest on the principal into 2,784 shares of common stock. These conversions resulted in a reduction of the option and warrant derivative liabilities. Adjustments to additional paid in capital were made for the
reduction in the fair value of the derivative features for each conversion. Using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following criteria: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 77.14%; (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.875%;
(4) expected remaining life of 2.5 years, a decrease in the fair value of the conversion feature derivative liability of $201,504 was recorded to additional paid in capital and a decrease in the fair value of the conversion feature derivative
liability of $5,229 was recorded to additional paid in capital resulting in a total increase to paid in capital of $206,733 for the three months and nine months ended September 31, 2006.

On July 3, 2006, the Company paid interest in cash resulting in a reduction in the embedded interest conversion derivative. An adjustment to additional
paid in capital was made for reduction in fair value of the interest to the interest conversion derivative. Using a Black-Scholes Model with the following criteria of the stock price on the date of the payment of $7.80 as follows: (1) dividend yield
of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 77.14%; (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.875%; (4) expected remaining life of 2.5 years, a decrease in the fair value of the interest conversion derivative liability of $60,887 was recorded to additional paid in
capital.

The Company filed an S-3 which became effective on June 12, 2006 upon which the Company could have chosen to pay the
interest with 136,796 shares of stock in-lieu of cash; however, the Company has chosen to pay the interest in cash of $598,356. On October 2, 2006, the Company paid interest in cash of $616,417 for the third quarter of 2006. The interest rate
for the three month period ended September 30, 2006 was 12.48%.

The accounting for the notes and warrants resulted in deferred
financing costs, discount for warrant derivatives and discount for embedded derivatives. These amounts, determined as of March 20, 2006, (the date of closing) will be amortized on a straight line basis into interest expense over the life of
notes and warrants. The following table summaries these amounts as of September 30, 2006:



|                                                                                                                    |  |                      |           |   |                               |   |           |                                 |  |   |                            |   |  |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | --------- | - | ----------------------------- | - | --------- | ------------------------------- |  | - | -------------------------- | - |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                                    |  | DeferredFinanceCosts |           |   | Discount forWarrantDerivative |   |           | Discount forEmbeddedDerivatives |  |   | Addition toInterestExpense |  
|Balance March 20, 2006 (closing date)                                                                               |  | $                    | 1,553,000 |   |                               | $ | 2,383,334 |                                 |  | $ | 8,195,564                  |   |  |   |            |  
|Percent change for conversion to common stock for September 30, 2006                                                |  |                      | (22,963   | ) |                               |   |          |                                 |  |   | (121,181                   | ) |  |   | (144,144   | )
|                                                                                                                    |  |                      |           |  
|Amortization for the period March 20, 2006 (date of closing) through September 30, 2006 charged to interest expense |  |                      | (273,214  | ) |                               |   | (419,292  | )                               |  |   | (1,441,809                 | ) |  |   | (2,134,315 | )
|                                                                                                                    |  |                      |           |   |                               |   |           |                                 |  |   |                            |   |  |   |            |  
|Remaining deferred costs and discount to be amortized                                                               |  | $                    | 1,256,823 |   |                               | $ | 1,964,042 |                                 |  | $ | 6,632,574                  |   |  | $ | (2,278,459 | )
|                                                                                                                    |  |                      |           |   |                               |   |           |                                 |  |   |                            |   |  |   |            |  

Daniel C. Montano Guaranty

On March 20, 2006, Daniel C. Montano, the Companys Chairman, Co-President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all obligations of the Company resulting from the sale on
March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants, see footnote 3.

After our obligations contained in the agreements
for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano was required to make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, Cardio will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such
payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the date reimbursed by us.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Pre IPO Debt

The Company issued convertible debt in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, payable to various individuals, as summarized below. During
the year ended December 31, 2005, the Series I, Series II and Series IIa convertible promissory notes were converted into 4,228,000 shares of common stock. Four note holders of convertible notes chose not to convert their notes into common
stock and these notes with a total of $30,000 were paid during the year ended December 31, 2005.

Convertible note holders were
required to notify the Company regarding their intent to convert their convertible notes into common stock in the 30-day period following the completion of the Companys IPO.

Series I Convertible Promissory Notes

The Series I Convertible Promissory Notes were payable in one
installment on the earlier of (i) thirty-six months from the date of issuance or (ii) 30 days after the successful completion of the Companys IPO. The notes were convertible at the option of the holder into the Companys common
stock. Interest at 7% per annum, compounded annually, was payable within 30 days of when the notes payable were due or converted into shares of the Companys common stock. The conversion price for each share equaled $2 per share, provided
however, if the purchase price of shares at the completion of the IPO was less than $4 per share, the conversion price would have been adjusted to equal 50% of the IPO price.

These notes have been converted into common shares. See conversion details Note 10.

Series II Convertible Promissory Notes

The Series II Convertible Promissory Notes were payable in
one installment on the earlier of (i) thirty-six months from the date of issuance or (ii) 30 days after the successful completion of the Companys IPO. The notes were convertible at the option of the holder into the Companys
common stock. Interest at 7% per annum, compounded annually, was payable within 30 days of when the notes payable were due or converted into shares of the Companys common stock. The conversion price for each share equaled $4 per share,
provided however, if the purchase price of shares at the completion of the initial public offering was less than $8 per share, the conversion price would have been adjusted to equal 50% of the initial public offering price.

These notes have been converted into common shares.

Series IIa Convertible Promissory Notes

In July 2004, the Company sold $800,000 of convertible notes payable series IIa.
The terms of the convertible notes payable series IIa are identical to the terms of the convertible notes payable series II as discussed above.

The convertible promissory notes were payable in one installment on the earlier of (i) thirty-six months from the date of issuance or (ii) 30 days after the successful completion of the Companys initial public offering. The
notes were convertible at the option of the holder into the Companys common stock. Interest at 7% per annum, compounded annually, was payable within 30 days of when the convertible notes payable were due or converted into shares of the
Companys common stock. The conversion price for each share equaled $4 per share, provided however, if the purchase price of shares at the completion of the initial public offering was less than $8 per share, the conversion price would have
been adjusted to equal 50% of the IPO price.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

These notes have
been converted into common shares. See conversion details Note 10.

Components of Interest Expense

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued Series II and Series IIa convertible promissory notes with an imbedded beneficial
conversion feature. As such, in accordance with EITF Issue No. 98-5, Accounting for Securities with Beneficial Conversion Feature or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratio and EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of Issue
No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, the difference between the conversion price and the Companys estimated fair market value of its stock price on the commitment date of the notes was calculated to be $2,050,000. The
Companys estimate of fair market value resulting in a beneficial conversion feature was based on the Letter of Intent with the underwriters. This amount will be recognized in the statement of operations as interest expense during
the period from the commitment date of the notes to the maturity dates of the notes.

The Company recognized interest expense resulting
from the beneficial conversion feature of $710,001, $0, and $2,050,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006
(unaudited).

Since the convertible promissory notes have a reset provision upon the completion of the IPO, the Company retested the
convertible notes payable for the beneficial conversion feature. Where the Company has issued convertible notes payable with beneficial conversion feature, the difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the common stock, at the
effective initial public offering date, will be recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized to interest expense over the redemption period of the convertible notes payable in accordance with EITF Issue No. 98-5, Accounting for
Securities with Beneficial Conversion Feature or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratio and EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments. No additional Beneficial Conversion feature
was required to be recovered.

In connection with these convertible notes payable, the Company incurred total financing costs of
$2,135,715. These costs had been capitalized and were being amortized over the term of the convertible notes payable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998
(inception) to September 30, 2006, (unaudited) total financing costs of $712,664, $0, and $2,135,715, respectively, were charged to interest expense.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006, (unaudited) the interest expense on the Series I, II
and IIa convertible notes was $166,820, $0 and $1,385,343, respectively.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and
2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006, (unaudited) the senior secured convertible notes was $0, $3,588,970 and $3,588,970, respectively, of which $1,861,101 of the interest expense is the
amortization of the derivative liabilities, and $273,214 is the amortization of deferred financing cost.

11. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

Preferred Stock

During the year ended
December 31, 2005, nine convertible preferred shareholders elected to convert 23,250 of their preferred shares into 2,325,000 shares of common stock. The 2,000,000 shares of common stock, which as of December 31, 2004 had not been issued,
but were classified as committed common stock, were issued during this period. At December 31, 2005 all issued preferred stock have been converted into common stock.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Common Stock

During the period ended December 31, 2004, 11 convertible preferred shareholders elected to convert 28,100 of their convertible preferred shares into
2,810,000 shares of common stock. At December 31, 2004, 2,000,000 shares of common stock had not been issued and were classified as committed common stock and were subsequently issued in 2005.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, 72 convertible Series I, II, and IIa note holders elected to convert $4,531,200 of notes into 1,649,550
shares of common stock.

On February 11, 2005, the Companys S-1 registration for the issuance of 1,500,000 new common shares was
declared effective. On February 16, 2005, the Companys Initial Public Offering (IPO) was closed, and the Company received gross proceeds of $15,693,000 and incurred underwriting discounts, expenses and commissions of $1,681,875 and
offering expenses payable by us of $655,500, resulting in net proceeds of $13,622,500.

On March 10, 2005, the underwriter exercised
its option for the over-allotment and the Company issued 225,000 common shares for proceeds to the Company of $2,030,625.

At
December 31, 2005, the convertible notes payable have been converted into common stock except $30,000 for which holders elected to be repaid. All common stock to be issued resulting from the conversion has been issued.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, nine convertible preferred shareholders elected to convert 23,250 of their preferred shares into 2,325,000
shares of common stock. In addition, six stock option holders exercised options to purchase 123,466 shares of common stock.

In December
2005, a warrant holder exercised 933,330 warrants in exchange for 848,482 shares of common stock.

In March 2006, a warrant holder
exercised 100,000 warrants in exchange for 89,116 shares of common stock.

In April 2006, two option holders exercised 55,000 options in
exchange for 55,000 shares of common stock.

In May 2006, 20 commemorative shares which had a fair value of $122 were issued to the
founders and the executives.

In August 2006, one option holder exercised 200,000 options in exchange for 200,000 shares of common stock.

In September 2006, one option holder exercised 10,000 options in exchange for 10,000 shares of common stock.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Convertible note holders elected to convert $295,723 of their notes receivable to 110,500 shares of
common stock including 28,000 committed shares. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006, $0, $7,576, and $7,576 of interest on senior secured
convertible notes were paid with common stock.

Stock Option Transactions

The Company has the ability to issue stock options to both employees and non-employees outside of its formal stock option plans. It is managements
intent to grant all options at exercise prices not less than 85% of the fair value of the Companys common stock, as the Board of Directors determines on the date of grant. Options typically expire ten years from the date of grant. During the
period from March 11, 1998 (inception) through September 30, 2006, the Company had granted options to both employees and consultants. The Company accounts for stock option transactions in accordance with SFAS 123R as discussed in Note 4.

Stock option transactions for 2006:



|                          |  |                 |  |                |       |                      |   |                                        |  |                            |  |   
|------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | -------------- | ----- | -------------------- | - | -------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | --
|Stock Option Transactions |  | Options Granted |  | Exercise Price |       | Estimated Fair Value |   | Weighted Average Expected Life (years) |  | Approximate Volatility (%)
|In February 2006 (a)      |  | 50,000          |  | $              | 10.00 |                      | $ | 234,830                                |  | 5                          |  | 76
|In March 2006 (b)         |  | 1,250           |  |                | 10.00 |                      |   | 5,424                                  |  | 5                          |  | 76
|In April 2006 (b)         |  | 3,000           |  |                | 10.00 |                      |   | 13,270                                 |  | 5                          |  | 79
|In July 2006 (b)          |  | 1,000           |  |                | 10.00 |                      |   | 3,140                                  |  | 10                         |  | 77
|In August 2006 (b)        |  | 2,800           |  |                | 10.00 |                      |   | 5,992                                  |  | 10                         |  | 77
|In September 2006 (b)     |  | 1,000           |  |                | 10.00 |                      |   | 2,140                                  |  | 10                         |  | 77

---

| | All options were granted from 2004 stock plan (defined next page). The fair value was estimated using Black-Scholes Model with an expected dividend yield of zero.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(a) | All options were issued for past services and therefore expensed on the date of grant.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | All options were issued for future services and will be expensed over the life of the options.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



24



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Stock Option
transactions for 2005 and prior years:

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued 550,500 options with an
exercise price of $10.00 to employees and directors, from the 2004 Stock Plan. In addition, six stock option holders executed their options to purchase 124,500 shares of common stock. Of the total 124,500 stock options exercised, 20,000 stock
options were exercised cashless.

In July 2004, the Company established the Cardiovascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan (the
2004 Stock Plan) permitting the awards of (a) incentive stock options within the meaning of section 422 of the Code, (b) non-qualified stock options, (c) stock appreciation rights, and (c) restricted stock to
directors, officers, employees and consultants. The Company reserved 5,000,000 shares for the 2004 Stock Plan and limited the maximum number of shares to be granted to any one individual in one year to 500,000.

On March 1, 2004, the Company granted 25,000 options to non-employees. The Company estimated the fair value of the options granted to be $21,385
using the Black-Scholes Model. All options were issued for past services and therefore expensed on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes Model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of .50 years, risk free rate of interest of 1.02 percent,
volatility of 76 percent and an expected dividend yield of zero.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, no options were granted to
employees. However, during the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 40,000 options to employees. The Company estimated the fair value of the options granted to be $57,792 using the Black-Scholes Model. All options were issued for
past services and therefore expensed on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes Model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of .25 years, risk free rate of interest of 1.03 to 1.50 percent, volatility of 76 percent and an expected dividend yield
of zero.

During the year ended December 31, 2002, no options were issued to non-employees. On September 1, 2003, the Company
granted 90,000 options to non-employees. The Company estimated the fair value of the options granted to be $47,120 using the Black-Scholes Model. All options were issued for past services and therefore expensed on the date of grant. The
Black-Scholes Model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of .75 years, risk free rate of interest of 1.39 percent, volatility of 76 percent and an expected dividend yield of zero.

The Company has the ability to issue stock options to both employees and non-employees under no formal stock option plans. It is managements intent
to grant all options at exercise prices not less than 85% of the fair value of the Companys common stock, as the Board of Directors determines on the date of grant. Options typically expire ten years from the date of grant and generally vest
immediately. During the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) through September 30, 2006, the Company had granted options to both employees and consultants.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Except as noted
above, no other compensation expense has been recognized in connection with grants of employee and non-employee stock options. Stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2004, and 2005 and for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006 is as follows:



|                                  |  |           |  |                |                 |        |           |                |   |                  |  |                |  |   |                 
|--------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | -------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | - | ---------------- |  | -------------- |  | - | ----------------
|                                  |  | Employees |  | Non-Employees  |                 | Total 
|                                  |  | Shares    |  | Exercise Price |                 | Shares |           | Exercise Price |   | Shares           |  | Exercise Price
|Outstanding at December 31, 2004  |  | 1,040,000 |  | $              | 0.30  -  $10.00 |        | 1,715,000 |                | $ | 0.30  -  $  4.00 |  | 2,755,000      |  | $ | 0.30  -  $10.00 
|Granted                           |  | 150,500   |  | $              | 10.00           |        | 400,000   |                | $ | 10.00            |  | 550,500        |  | $ | 10.00           
|Exercised                         |  |          |  | $              |                |        | 124,500   |                | $ |                 |  | 124,500        |  | $ | 0.30  -  $  2.00
|Forfeitures                       |  | 20,000    |  | $              | 10.00           |        |          |                | $ |                 |  | 20,000         |  | $ | 10.00           
|                                  |  |           |  |                |                 |       
|Outstanding at December 31, 2005  |  | 1,170,500 |  | $              | 0.30  -  $10.00 |        | 1,990,500 |                | $ | 0.30  -  $10.00  |  | 3,161,000      |  | $ | 0.30  -  $10.00 
|Granted                           |  | 9,050     |  | $              | 10.00           |        | 50,000    |                | $ | 10.00            |  | 59,050         |  | $ | 10.00           
|Exercised                         |  |          |  | $              |                |        | 265,000   |                | $ | 0.30  -  $  0.50 |  | 265,000        |  | $ | 0.30  -  $  0.50
|                                  |  |           |  |                |                 |       
|Outstanding at September 30, 2006 |  | 1,179,550 |  | $              | 0.30  -  $10.00 |        | 1,775,500 |                | $ | 0.30  -  $10.00  |  | 2,955,050      |  | $ | 0.30  -  $10.00 

Weighted average exercise price of options granted and exercisable and the weighted average
remaining contractual life for options outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2006 was as follows:



|                               |  |                 |  |                              |      |                                               |      |                |   |          
|------------------------------ |  | --------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ---- | --------------------------------------------- | ---- | -------------- | - | ---------
|                               |  | Number ofShares |  | WeightedAverageExercisePrice |      | WeightedAverageRemainingContractualLife Years |      | IntrinsicValue
|As of December 31, 2005        |  |                 |  |                              |      |                                               |      |                |   |          
|EmployeesOutstanding          |  | 1,170,500       |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.56 |                | $ | 1,989,850
|EmployeesExpected to Vest     |  | 105,114         |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.56 |                | $ | 178,694  
|EmployeesExercisable          |  | 1,065,386       |  | $                            | 1.70 |                                               | 4.02 |                | $ | 1,811,156
|Non-EmployeesOutstanding      |  | 1,990,500       |  | $                            | 2.50 |                                               | 5.26 |                | $ | 4,976,250
|Non-EmployeesExpected to Vest |  |                |  |                              |     |                                               |     |                |   |         
|Non EmployeesExercisable      |  | 1,990,500       |  | $                            | 2.50 |                                               | 5.26 |                | $ | 4,976,250
|As of September 30, 2006       |  |                 |  |                              |      |                                               |      |                |   |          
|EmployeesOutstanding          |  | 1,179,550       |  | $                            | 1.76 |                                               | 4.09 |                | $ | 2,075,500
|EmployeesExpected to Vest     |  | 112,794         |  | $                            | 1.76 |                                               | 4.09 |                | $ | 198,469  
|EmployeesExercisable          |  | 1,066,756       |  | $                            | 1.76 |                                               | 4.09 |                | $ | 1,877,031
|Non-EmployeesOutstanding      |  | 1,775,500       |  | $                            | 3.55 |                                               | 5.52 |                | $ | 6,306,484
|Non-EmployeesExpected to Vest |  |                |  |                              |     |                                               |     |                |   |         
|Non EmployeesExercisable      |  | 1,775,500       |  | $                            | 3.55 |                                               | 5.52 |                | $ | 6,306,484

Option DerivativesRESTATED

Of the 1,775,500 non-employee options outstanding at September 30, 2006, 1,325,500 issued prior to March 20, 2006 issued to non-employees for services and
have been reclassified as the Option Derivatives. However, 450,000 non-employee options were issued to directors under the 2004 Stock Plan. In accordance with FAS 123(R), the options issued to directors, for services provided to the Company in each
individual capacity as a director, are accounted for as options issued to employees and hence, were not reclassified as the Options Derivative. See Note 2Restatements and Note 12- Reclassification of Equity Transactions

Warrants

The Companys accounting policy for
the issuance of warrants is discussed in Note 4. Warrants have only been issued to outside parties and have never been issued to employees.

In December 2000, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 933,330 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share to an individual in connection with assisting in closing a private placement.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

The fair value of
the warrant was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the value of $115,475 was recorded as a reduction of the net proceeds received in the private placement. The Black-Scholes Model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of 3.5
years, risk free rate of interest of 5.02 percent, zero volatility and an expected dividend yield of zero. The warrants fully vested in December 2001 expire in December 2005. However, prior to the expiration date in December 2005 the holder of the
warrants elected to exercise 933,330 warrants in exchange for 848,482 shares of common stock. The exercise of these warrants was cashless.

In January 2001, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share to an individual in connection with consulting services rendered. The warrant was deemed to have no value as
determined using the Black-Scholes Model. The Black-Scholes Model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of 3.5 years, risk free rate of interest of 4.89 percent, zero volatility and an expected dividend yield of zero. The warrant was fully
vested on the date of grant and was exercised in March 2006.

In June 2003, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share to an individual in connection with consulting services rendered. The fair value of the warrant was determined using the Black-Scholes Model and the value of $119,744 was recorded as a
compensation expense in the Statement of Operations. The Black-Scholes Model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of 3.5 years, risk free rate of interest of 0.94 percent, volatility of 76 percent and an expected dividend yield of zero. The
warrant fully vested on the date of grant and expires in June 2013.

On February 16, 2005, the Company sold a warrant for 75,000
shares of common stock at 125% of the IPO price for $75.00 to the underwriter pursuant to the underwriting agreement. The warrants have a term of four years commencing on the effective date of the IPO, February 11, 2005.

In April 2006, the Company granted 250,000 warrants with an exercise price of $10.00 to an officer/Director. The Company estimated the fair value of the
warrants granted to be $1,602,500 using the Black-Scholes Model. All warrants were issued for past services and will be expensed over a one year vesting period. The fair value of the vested portion of these warrants of $801,250 was classified as
part of the warrant derivative. The Black-Scholes Model assumptions were as follows: Expected life of 10 years, volatility of 79 percent, risk free rate of interest of 5.125% and an expected dividend yield of zero.

Warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) is as follows:



|                                           |  |                     |   |  |                                 |      
|------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------- | - |  | ------------------------------- | -----
|                                           |  | WarrantsOutstanding |   |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price
|Outstanding at December 31, 2004           |  | 1,233,330           |   |  | $                               | 0.69 
|Granted                                    |  |                    |   |  |                                 |     
|Sold                                       |  | 75,000              |   |  |                                 | 12.50
|Exercised                                  |  | (933,330            | ) |  |                                 | 0.40 
|Forfeited                                  |  |                    |   |  |                                 |     
|                                           |  |                     |   |  |                                 |      
|Outstanding at December 31, 2005           |  | 375,000             |   |  | $                               | 3.78 
|Granted                                    |  | 250,000             |   |  |                                 | 10.00
|Sold                                       |  | 705,882             |   |  |                                 | 8.50 
|Exercised                                  |  | (100,000            | ) |  |                                 | 0.80 
|Forfeited                                  |  |                    |   |  |                                 |     
|                                           |  |                     |   |  |                                 |      
|Outstanding at September 30, 2006          |  | 1,230,882           |   |  | $                               | 7.63 
|                                           |  |                     |   |  |                                 |      
|Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2004  |  | 1,233,330           |   |  | $                               | 0.69 
|                                           |  |                     |   |  |                                 |      
|Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2005  |  | 375,000             |   |  | $                               | 3.78 
|                                           |  |                     |   |  |                                 |      
|Warrants exercisable at September 30, 2006 |  | 1,043,382           |   |  | $                               | 7.63 
|                                           |  |                     |   |  |                                 |      



27



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

The following
table summarizes information about warrants outstanding at September 30, 2006:



|                         |  |                     |  |                                         |  |                                 |       |                      |           |                                 |   |      
|------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ----- | -------------------- | --------- | ------------------------------- | - | -----
|Range of Exercise Prices |  | WarrantsOutstanding |  | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) |  | Weighted Average Exercise Price |       | Warrants Exercisable |           | Weighted Average Exercise Price
|$2.00                    |  | 200,000             |  | 6.73                                    |  | $                               | 2.00  |                      | 200,000   |                                 | $ | 2.00 
|8.50                     |  | 705,882             |  | 2.47                                    |  |                                 | 8.50  |                      | 705,882   |                                 |   | 8.50 
|10.00                    |  | 250,000             |  | 9.54                                    |  |                                 | 10.00 |                      | 62,500    |                                 |   | 10.00
|12.50                    |  | 75,000              |  | 2.38                                    |  |                                 | 12.50 |                      | 75,000    |                                 |   | 12.50
|                         |  |                     |  |                                         |  |                                 |       |                      |           |                                 |   |      
|Total                    |  | 1,230,882           |  |                                         |  |                                 |       |                      | 1,043,382 |                                 |   |      
|                         |  |                     |  |                                         |  |                                 |       |                      |           |                                 |   |      

Warrant DerivativeRESTATEMENT

Of the 1,230,882 warrants outstanding at September 30, 2006, 250,000 warrants issued in April 2006 and the vested portion of 125,000 were classified as
Warrant Derivatives, 275,000 warrants issued prior to March 20, 2006 were reclassified as Warrant Derivatives and 705,882 warrants issued with the convertible note are classified as Warrant Derivatives as part of the convertible note. See Note
2Restatement and Note 12Reclassification of Equity Transactions.

Authorized Shares

At the Companys 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, held on May 23, 2005, the shareholders approved to amend the Certificate of Incorporation
to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 400,000,000 shares. They also authorized the board of directors at its discretion to implement a two-for-one (2:1) stock split in the Common Stock of the Company, if at all, prior
to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

12. RECLASSIFICATION OF EQUITY TRANSACTIONS (RESTATED)

As discussed in Note 11Stockholders Equity of the notes to the financial statements, this restatement is to correct an error in identifying
certain financial instruments as derivatives in the application of certain accounting principles related to the issuance of the Companys convertible note financing and the impact of such accounting principles on previously issued and vested
non-employee stock option and warrant transactions in prior periods. The previously recorded transactions were properly treated as equity transactions at the time of their respective issuances. Upon the sale of the Companys convertible notes
on March 20, 2006, as more fully set forth below, accounting practices require the previously issued and vested non-employee options and warrants to be reclassified as derivative liabilities. The reclassification of previously issued and vested
options and warrants as derivative instruments requires the Companys financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2006 to be restated.

The convertible note agreements entered into on March 20, 2006 and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on March 22, 2006 contain variable share settlement provisions. These provisions require the Company to reclassify, at
fair value, previously issued and vested options and warrants from additional paid in capital to derivative liability accounts on the balance sheet in accordance with EITF 00-19 Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments
Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in a Companys Own Stock. The reason for this reclassification is the possibility that the Company may not have enough authorized unissued common stock to meet all of its commitments in the delivery of
the Companys common stock to honor both the contracts related to the convertible notes and the previously issued and vested option and warrant contracts. In order to be in the situation of not having enough unissued shares to deliver to the
option and warrant holders, the fair market value of the common stock of the Company would have to be lower than all of the exercise prices of all the option and warrant contracts. In such case, an option or warrant holder would have to exercise his
or her options or warrants at a price that would require him or her to pay more than the fair market value of the common stock on the open market. Nonetheless, according to EITF 00-19 the previously recorded transactions must be reclassified from
equity to liability. In addition, further analysis indicates the previously issued and vested options and warrants identified as derivative instruments require separate valuation under FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities.

Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of EITF 00-19, the Company has analyzed all instruments previously recorded
as permanent equity under EITF 00-19, which is described in detail in Note 11Stockholders Equity.

As of March 20, 2006, the
closing date of the convertible note financing, the Company reclassified 1,590,500 options granted to non-employees to an option derivative liability at the fair value of the relevant instruments in the amount of approximately $10,583,305, which was
recorded based upon fair values computed using the Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) the range of the expected volatility of 71.18% to 84.42%, (3) the range of the risk-free interest rate of 4.61% to
4.62%, (4) the range of the expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual instrument.

As of March 20, 2006, the
closing date of the convertible note financing, the Company reclassified 275,000 warrants granted to non-employees to Warrant derivative liability at the fair value of the relevant instruments in the amount of approximately $1,355,750, which was
recorded based upon fair values computed using the Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) the range of the expected volatility of 71.18% to 84.42%, (3) the range risk-free interest rate of 4.61% to 4.62%,
(4) the range expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual instrument.

At March 31, 2006, in accordance with the
requirements of FAS 133, the fair value of each instrument was again computed under the Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions (1) dividend yield 0%, (2) the range of the expected volatility of 71.44% to 84.04%, (3) the range of the
risk-free interest rate of 4.82% to 4.83%, (4) the range of the expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual instrument resulting in an increase to the individual derivatives and additional expense for Adjustment to Fair
Value of Derivatives of $1,032,420 for the Option Derivatives and $149,250 for the Warrant Derivative for a total of $1,181,670.

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, non-employee option holders exercised 55,000 options resulting in a reduction of the Option Derivative liability. Adjustments to additional paid in capital were made for the reduction in the fair
value of the derivative feature of each option as of the date of the option exercise. Using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following criteria: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 71.80%  76.48%; (3) risk-free
interest rate of 4.97%; (4) expected remaining life of 3.18-4.17 years, a decrease in the fair value of the option derivative liability of $384,000 was recorded to additional paid in capital.

At June 30,2006, in accordance with the requirements of FAS 133, the fair value of each instrument was again computed under a Black-Scholes Model with
the following assumptions (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) the range of the expected volatility of 79.24% to 84.56% (3) the range of the risk-free interest rate of 5.11% to 5.15%, (4) expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual
instrument resulting in a decrease to the individual derivatives and additional other income for Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives of $5,594,920 for the option derivative and $910,625 for the warrant derivative for a total of
$6,505,545 for the three month period and decrease to the individual derivates and additional other income for Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives of $4,562,500 for the Option Derivative and $761,375 for the Warrant Derivative for a
total of $5,323,875 for the six month period.

During the three months ended September 30, 2006, non-employee option holders exercised
210,000 options resulting in a reduction of the Option Derivative liability. Adjustments to additional paid in capital were made for the reduction in the fair value of the derivative feature of each option as of the date of the option exercise.
Using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following criteria; (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 73.07%  78.30%; (3) risk-free interest rate of 4.74%-4.98%; (4) expected remaining life of 2.88-3.83 years, a decrease
in the fair value of the option derivative liability of $690,000 was recorded to additional paid in capital.

At September 30, 2006, in
accordance with the requirements of FAS 133, the fair value of each instrument was again computed under a Black-Scholes Model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected range of volatility of 77.92% to 83.26%, (3)
risk-free interest rate range of 4.60% to 4.64% and (4) expected life and exercise prices consistent with each individual instrument resulting in a decrease to the individual derivates and additional other income for Adjustment to Fair Value
of Derivativeswarrant and option derivative of $2,326,045 for the Option Derivative, and $732,875 for the Warrant Derivative for a total of $3,058,920 for the 3 month period, and decrease to the individual derivates and additional other
income for Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives of $6,504,545 for the Option Derivative, and $1,494,250 for the Warrant Derivative for a total of $7,998,795 for the nine month period.

13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Daniel C. Montano, Chairman of the Board, Co-President and Chief Executive
Officer, consulting fees in the amount of $0, $0, and $200,000, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2005
(unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Daniel C. Montano, Chairman of the Board, Co-President and Chief Executive Officer, for employment services in
the amount of $321,769, $369,231 and $1,705,379 respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006
(unaudited), and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Vizier Management Company, Inc. controlled by Daniel C. Montano, Chairman of the Board, Co-President and Chief Executive Officer,
consulting fees in the amount of $0, $0 and $116,000 respectively.

Cardio paid commissions to GHL Financial Services Ltd.
(GHL), in which a director is a principal and owns 4.47% of the Company, for the overseas sale of the Companys convertible notes payable and Preferred Stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006
(unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid GHL $5,000, $20,000, and $2,205,255 respectively.

Cardio paid consulting fees to Dr. Thomas Stegmann M.D., the Companys co-founder and Co-President and Chief Clinical Officer, to assist in the development process of its products. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Dr. Stegmann $259,250, $375,000 and $1,364,300, respectively.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Cardio paid C.K.
Capital International and C&K Capital Corporation, controlled by Alexander G. Montano, son of Daniel C. Montano, for consulting services. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from
March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), consulting fees Cardio incurred were $5,000, $1,218,000 and $1,763,240, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), Cardio paid Dr. Wolfgang Priemer,
the Companys co-founder, to assist in the development process of its products. Cardio paid Dr. Priemer $42,000, $55,000 and $256,555, respectively.

On March 15, 2006 the Company entered into a Standard Lease Guaranty (the Lease Guaranty) of the Standard Industrial Net Lease between Canta Rana Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership and
Phage (the Lease Agreement). Pursuant to the Lease Guaranty, the Company guarantees full performance of all of Phages obligations under the Lease Agreement. (See note 13).

During August, 2006, the Company requested Phage conduct the pack-and-fill of the drug product for the PAD Phase I clinical trial. Phage obtained a
third-party proposal as a benchmark for the pack-and-fill. The Company agreed to have Phage conduct the pack-and-fill provided Phage does not exceed the amount of the third-party proposal. Phage will either perform the project in its new
manufacturing facility or outsource the work. The total project cost is estimated to be $528,000. The Company has paid $396,000 to Phage for this project as of September 30, 2006.

14. INCOME TAXES

The Company currently anticipates
that its effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 will be 0%. Accordingly and in accordance with the Interim Reporting Requirements of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim
Financial Reporting, the Company has not provided a provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

At
September 30, 2006, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $30,527,319 and $33,478,054, respectively, as compared to $25,700,000 at December 31, 2005,
which expires through 2020. The utilization of net operating loss carry forwards may be limited due to the ownership change under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and similar state provisions. The company also has a federal
research and development credit carry forward of $172,834.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company recognized
certain tax benefits in amount of $610,000 related to temporary differences and recorded a valuation allowance against these tax benefits of an equal amount.

The net operating loss carry-forwards are the only significant deferred income tax assets of the Company. They have been offset by a valuation allowance since management does not believe the recoverability of this
deferred tax assets during the next fiscal year is more likely than not. Accordingly, a deferred income tax benefit has not been recognized in these financial statements.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

15. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES

Leases

In April
2004, the Company entered into a non-cancelable operating lease agreement for office space that requires monthly payments of $5,882 and expired in October 2005. On May 2004, the Company gave a deposit of $5,900. The Company vacated this facility in
October 2005 and has obtained the return of the deposit.

In August 2004, the Company guaranteed Phages obligations under a
non-cancelable operating lease for laboratory and office space at University of California Irvine Research Center. The lease is for 11,091 rentable square feet for the period March 1, 2004 through August 31, 2006, and provided for a
monthly rent of approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses. During 2004 and 2005, the Company sub-leased space from Phage for approximately $2,800 per month as part of the agreement for administrative services. The lease along
with the Companys guarantees expired during the third quarter of 2006.

In November 2005, the Company entered into a five year
operating lease for its corporate headquarters commencing on March 1, 2006. The lease provides for a renewal option for an additional five years. The lease provides for increases in annual rental payments of approximately 3%. Also, the
agreement requires the Company to pay its share of certain common operating costs that are to be assessed annually. For the nine months ending September 30, 2005 and 2006, rent expense totaled $0 and $127,466, respectively.

Cardio entered into a Second Amendment dated September 8, 2006 (to be effective as of September 1, 2006) for the expansion space use of
administrative offices in Las Vegas. The Second Amendment commences on August 29, 2006 and shall run coterminous with the term of that certain lease, dated November 1, 2005 for the space, consisting of 7,190 square feet of rentable space
and expires on February 28, 2011. In total, including the annual base rent the Cardio will pay approximately $585,594 in Base Rent for the expansion Space throughout the term of the Lease.

Cardio entered into a Lease Agreement dated August 7, 2006 with Nancy Ridge LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for the use of general office
and laboratory space in San Diego, CA. The Lease commences on September 1, 2006 and expires on May 13, 2013, at which time the Company will have the option of extending the lease by five years on the same terms and conditions of the Lease.
The Company has paid Nancy Ridge a fully refundable security deposit in the amount of $57,804, and further agrees to pay $15,228 per month for the term of the Lease for the use of 6,768 square feet of general office and laboratory space.

The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under the lease agreement:



|           |  |   |           |        | 
|---------- |  | - | --------- | ------ | 
|Year       |  |   |           | Amount
|2006       |  | $ | 93,490   
|2007       |  |   | 458,722  
|2008       |  |   | 523,029  
|2009       |  |   | 541,233  
|2010       |  |   | 558,829  
|thereafter |  |   | 596,947  
|           |  |   |           |        | 
|Total      |  | $ | 2,772,250
|           |  |   |           |        | 

The company bills related parties approximately $6,000 per month for use of space.

Phage Lease Guaranty

The Company
entered into a Standard Lease Guaranty (the Lease Guaranty) dated March 15, 2006 of the Standard Industrial Net Lease dated March 15, 2006, between Canta Rana Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership and Phage
Biotechnology Corporation (Phage), a Delaware corporation (the Lease Agreement). Pursuant to the Lease Guaranty, the Company guarantees full performance of all of Phages obligations under the Lease Agreement.

In exchange for the Companys guarantee of the Lease Agreement, Phage entered
into an Indemnity and Reimbursement Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006. Phage will pay the Company certain fees payable on the first day of each calendar month that will be the sum of the following amounts (collectively, Guaranty
Fees): (a) one-tenth (1/10th) of one percent (1%) of the remaining aggregate amount of the
Minimum Monthly Rent due under the Lease Agreement from the period from March 15, 2006 to the Expiration Date of the Lease Agreement;



30



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

and (b) one-tenth (1/10th) of one percent (1%) of the remaining
aggregate amount of Additional Rent due under the Lease Agreement following the payment of Additional Rent. Any amount of Guaranty Fees not paid by Phage on the first calendar day of each month shall accrue interest at the lesser of twelve percent
(12%) per annum or the maximum rate allowable by law until paid.

For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the company
earned $11,622 of Guaranty Fees from Phage.

Phage is an affiliated private biotechnology company that manufactures recombinant protein
drugs for the Company and is the Companys sole supplier of its drug candidates formulated with Cardio Vascu-Grow.

If Phage
defaults on payment of the Minimum Monthly Rent or the Additional Rent, which monthly payments aggregate approximately $20,000, the Company is obligated, pursuant to the Lease Guaranty, to pay to the lessor the rents in default. The Companys
maximum contingent liability is approximately $1,737,329 as of September 30, 2006 and will decrease by approximately $20,000 per month as Minimum Monthly Rent and the Additional Rent are paid by Phage.

Phage has indemnified the Company for any amounts required to be paid by the Company pursuant to the Lease Guaranty in the Indemnity and Reimbursement
Agreement dated as of March 15, 2006.

The lease guarantee is irrevocably released when Phage provides to Canta Rana Ranch, L.P. a
bank statement showing a balance of $5,000,000.

Employment Agreements

In April 2000, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Scientific Officer, effective May 1, 2000. Under the terms of the employment agreement, the Company paid a monthly salary of $3,000.
Also, Cardio provided a vehicle allowance equal to $500 per month. The agreement was for three years and expired on April 15, 2003.

In July 2004, the Company entered into an employment agreement with a non-executive employee, effective August 1, 2004, under the terms of which Cardio will pay a monthly salary of $10,000. The agreement is for three years and expires
July 31, 2007.

Consulting Agreements

The Company entered into numerous consulting agreements whereby the consultants assisted the Company in the development process, regulatory affairs and financial management. For the periods ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited), 2006
(unaudited) and the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), consulting fees related to the various agreements were $390,580, $592,997 and $1,918,116 respectively.

In addition to the consulting fees, the Company issued 2,715,000 non-employee stock options, with an exercise price range of $0.30$4.00 per share.
The options vested immediately and have a contract life of



31



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

10 years. The Company also
issued 300,000 warrants with an exercise price range of $0.80-$2.00 per share. The warrants are exercisable immediately and have a contract life of 10 years.

List of consulting agreement:



|           |  |                    |  |                         |  |           |  |         
|---------- |  | ------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | --------- |  | --------
|ItemNumber |  | Contract           |  | Agreement Name          |  | Start     |  | End Date
|1          |  | E&G Consulting     |  | Regulatory Affairs      |  | 1-Jun-05  |  | 6-Dec-06
|2          |  | Judith Pelton      |  | Corporate Secretary     |  | 20-Mar-98 |  | 1-Jan-06
|3          |  | Mickael Flaa       |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 1-Jun-03  |  | Ongoing 
|4          |  | Amy Montano        |  | Investor Relations      |  | 20-Mar-98 |  | Ongoing 
|5          |  | Investor Awareness |  | Public Relation         |  | 1-Nov-04  |  | 1-Jun-06

Service Agreements

The Company has entered the service agreements set forth on the following table.

The service fees for the obligations
below were determined through a process of competitive bids and/or negotiation. Our outstanding contractual obligations are summarized below:



|           |  |                                                                                |  |                                                                                          |  |           |  |                                                 
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|ItemNumber |  | Contract                                                                       |  | Agreement Name                                                                           |  | Start     |  | End Date                                        
|1          |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Technical Services Agreement                                                             |  | 1-Mar-00  |  | 1-Mar-20                                        
|2          |  | Cardio Phage International (CPI)                                             |  | Distribution agreement                                                                   |  | 16-Aug-04 |  | 16-Aug-13                                       
|3          |  | Korea Bio-Development Corporation                                              |  | Manufacturing and distribution agreement                                                 |  | 15-Dec-00 |  | 15-Dec-99                                       
|4          |  | Hesperion, Inc. (TouchStone, formerly Clinical CardioVascular Research, LLC) |  | Clinical development of investigational drugs and devices for cardiovascular indications |  | 24-Oct-01 |  | ongoing                                         
|5          |  | Dr. Thomas Stegmann                                                            |  | Royalty agreement                                                                        |  | 16-Aug-04 |  | 31-Dec-13                                       
|6          |  | Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc.                                    |  | Product development                                                                      |  | 1-Jun-04  |  | Upondelivery ofand paymentfor catheters         
|7          |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Lease Guarantee Irvine                                                                   |  | 1-Sep-04  |  | 31-Aug-06                                       
|8          |  | JDM Consulting                                                                 |  | Marketing and Mailing                                                                    |  | 11-Mar-06 |  | 1-Oct-06                                        
|9          |  | bioRASI, LLC                                                                   |  | CRO agreement                                                                            |  | 8-Aug-05  |  | Completionof clinicaltrial                      
|10         |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Lease Guarantee - San Diego                                                              |  | 15-Mar-06 |  | 15-Aug-13                                       
|11         |  | Promethean                                                                     |  | Convertible Notes                                                                        |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | 19-Mar-09                                       
|12         |  | Daniel C. Montano                                                              |  | Guarantee agreement                                                                      |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | first date ofgeneratingrevenue                  
|13         |  | Daniel C. Montano                                                              |  | Guarantee reimbursement agreement                                                        |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | first date ofgeneratingrevenue                  
|14         |  | Capital Financial Media                                                        |  | Investor relations                                                                       |  | 6-Jul-06  |  | Upondistributionof report onthe Company         
|15         |  | Kendle (formerly Charles River)                                                |  | CRO agreement                                                                            |  | 8-Aug-06  |  | Completionof Phase IISevereCoronaryHeart Disease
|16         |  | The Bruckner Group                                                             |  | Feasibility Study                                                                        |  | 4-Aug-06  |  | Uponcompletionof study                          
|17         |  | Zimmerman Adams International                                                  |  | Investing banking                                                                        |  | 6-Jun-06  |  | ongoing                                         

---

|1) | The Company agreed to jointly own and license from one another the right to use certain patents including the patents related to FGF-11. As part of that agreement, at our election,
the Company is obligated to either (i) pay to Phage ten percent of its net sales or drugs manufactured by Phage or (ii) pay to Phage a six percent royalty based on drugs which Phage does not manufacture.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) | CPI will act as distributor for the products of both Phage and the Company in locations throughout the world other than United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, China, and the Republic
of Korea. CPI is obligated to pay an amount equal to 50% of CPIs gross revenue from sales of the Companys products less CPIs direct and indirect costs.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3) | As part of this agreement, KBDC arranged the purchase of 8,750,000 shares of the Companys common stock for $3,602,000 by Cardio Korea, Ltd. KBDC agreed to fund all of the
regulatory approval process in Korea for any of the Companys products. In addition, KBDC agreed to pay the Company a royalty of ten percent net revenue from sales in its Asian territories.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4) | Hesperion will assist the Company with the FDA approval process for its drug candidates.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|5) | The Companys royalty agreement with Dr. Stegmann will provide him with a one percent royalty on net revenue from the sale of the Companys drug candidates, if any,
measured quarterly and payable 90 days after quarter end.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|6) | Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc. will design, develop, and fabricate two different prototype catheter products that will facilitate the administration of CVBT-141A by
catheter procedures.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|7) | This lease is for 11,091 rentable square feet and provides for a monthly rent of approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses. This lease and the Companys
guarantee expired in September 2006.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|8) | This agreement is for implementing a wide range of marketing and shareholder awareness programs.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|9) | This agreement is for the purpose of assisting in the Companys clinical trials in Russia. bioRASI is the strategic initiative of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and is
responsible for commercializing RAS bio-sciences and clinical resources. bioRASI is a contract research organization (CRO) providing services for its collaborative R&D clients in the areas of drug development, biologicals, and medical
devices.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|10) | This agreement is for a new manufacturing facility in San Diego, CA. The lease provides for Minimum Monthly Rent and Additional Rent for shared costs, which aggregate approximately
$20,000 per month.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|11) | The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors to place $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of the
Companys common stock. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time at $12 per share (the Fixed Conversion Price). In addition, the notes are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of
the average of the preceding five days weighted average trading price, if the result is lower than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into the Companys common stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no
more than 10% of the original $20,000,000 note balance per calendar month. The notes mature in March 2009, and bear a resetting floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 7%. The warrants may be exercised anytime up to March 2009. The warrant
exercise price is $8.50 per share. Substantially all of the Companys assets secure the notes.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|12) | Daniel C. Montano, Chairman, Co-President and CEO of the Company, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all of the Companys obligations resulting
from the sale on March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the first date on which the Company receives revenue from the sale of drugs after such drug has been approved by the FDA,
provided that on such date the Company is not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will
terminate upon the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into the Companys common stock.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|13) | After the Companys obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano was required to make any
payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of the Companys obligations, the Company will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C.
Montano to the date reimbursed by the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|14) | This agreement is for the purpose of preparing and distributing information about the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|15) | Kendle (formerly Charles River Laboratory) will support the Phase II Severe Coronary Heart Disease clinical trial ensuring that the protocol and study adhere to FDA regulatory
requirements. The total direct and indirect costs are estimated to be $3,917,810.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|16) | The Bruckner Group Incorporated will assist in exploring the potential economic consequences of applying FGF-1141 to a variety of clinical scenarios and patent types. This project
will take 16 to 20 weeks with approximate total cost of $475,000.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|17) | The purpose of this consulting agreement is to audit the interim financial reports for the purpose of proposed admission document to AIM (London Stock Exchange). The Company will
pay Zimmerman 100,000 GBP before admission to AIM and another 50,000 GBP in January 2007.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               |  |                                    |           |                                                                 |   |           |  |   |           
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | --------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | - | --------- |  | - | ----------
|                                               |  | For the Quarter EndedSeptember 31, |           | For thePeriod fromMarch 11, 1998(Inception)
toSeptember 31,2006
|                                               |  | 2005                               |           | 2006                                                            |  
|Service Fees Paid for Above Contracts:         |  |                                    |           |                                                                 |   |           |  |   |           
|Hesperion (formerly TouchStone Research, Inc.) |  | $                                  | 822,307   |                                                                 | $ | 1,508,867 |  | $ | 4,492,162 
|bioRASI                                        |  |                                    | 104,082   |                                                                 |   | 668,220   |  |   | 848,279   
|BS Biology                                     |  |                                    |          |                                                                 |   |          |  |   | 370,000   
|Da Vinci Biomedical Research                   |  |                                    |          |                                                                 |   |          |  |   | 431,698   
|Catheter and Disposables Technologies          |  |                                    | 31,240    |                                                                 |   | 18,534    |  |   | 68,126    
|JDM Consulting                                 |  |                                    | 1,133,000 |                                                                 |   | 1,460,000 |  |   | 2,593,000 
|Capital Financial Media                        |  |                                    |          |                                                                 |   | 870,000   |  |   | 870,000   
|Kendle                                         |  |                                    |          |                                                                 |   | 772,236   |  |   | 772,236   
|Bruckner Group                                 |  |                                    |          |                                                                 |   | 237,500   |  |   | 237,500   
|Zimmerman Adams International                  |  |                                    |          |                                                                 |   | 93,760    |  |   | 93,760    
|                                               |  |                                    |           |                                                                 |   |           |  |   |           
|Total                                          |  | $                                  | 2,090,629 |                                                                 | $ | 5,629,117 |  | $ | 10,776,761

Securities Act Compliance

Commencing in 2001 and ending in August 2004, the Company sold two series of convertible notes to investors who, with a few exceptions, were not residents or citizens of the United States. The Company made these sales
in reliance on the fact that the sales occurred outside the United States and were thus not subject



32



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

to the jurisdiction of the
Securities Act or were made to accredited investors pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by the Securities Act. The Companys counsel has advised that the availability of those exemptions cannot be determined with legal certainty
and that it is possible that the sale of some of the series of convertible notes may have violated the registration requirements of the Securities Act. As to most of those sales, a right of rescission may exist on which the statute of limitation has
not run. For those note holders that elected to convert to common stock and who have not sold that stock, the Company may have a contingent liability arising from the original purchase of the convertible notes that such note holders converted. That
liability would extend for up to six years after the date of the sale of the applicable convertible note that was converted to common stock. The notes were converted at either $2.00 per share or $4.00 per share. All of the notes have been either
converted into common stock or repaid in full.

The Company is unable to accurately estimate the likelihood or amount of potential
liability that, if any, may arise for this contingency.

Government Regulation

Regulation by government authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture and marketing of
drug products and in our ongoing research and product development activities. Drug candidates will require regulatory approval by government agencies prior to commercialization. In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous
preclinical studies and clinical trials and other approval procedures of the FDA and similar regulatory authorities in foreign countries. Various federal and state statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety,
labeling, storage and record keeping related to such products and their marketing. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent substantial compliance with appropriate federal and state statutes and regulations require the expenditure
of substantial time and financial resources.

Preclinical studies are generally conducted in laboratory animals to evaluate the potential
safety and the efficacy of a product. Drug developers submit the results of preclinical studies to the FDA as a part of an investigational new drug application, which must be approved before clinical trials in humans may begin. Typically, clinical
development of a new drug candidate involves three phases of clinical trials that are costly and time consuming. These Phases include:



|          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|--------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Phase I   |  | Clinical trials are conducted with a small number of subjects to determine the early safety profile, maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of the product in human
volunteers.                                        
|          | 
|Phase II  |  | Clinical trials are conducted with groups of patients afflicted with a specific disease in order to determine preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages and expanded evidence of
safety.                                        
|          | 
|Phase III |  | Large scale, multi-center, comparative trials are conducted with patients afflicted with a target disease in order to provide enough data to demonstrate with substantial evidence the efficacy
and safety the FDA requires.

The Company has completed treatment of all patients in its Phase I trial, including measuring
clinical outcomes at different dosages of the drug in the target patient population of No-Option Heart Patients. The Company will now notify the FDA of the safety results obtained from this study and plans to commence its Phase II trials in a larger
population of No-Option Heart Patients.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

The Company has
been authorized by the FDA that it may proceed in clinical testing of a second candidate formulated with Cardio Vascu-Grow in a second medical indication, diabetic wound healing. A Phase I study has begun which is testing the safety of this drug candidate after topical
administration to diabetic ulcers and venous stasis wounds.

The FDA closely monitors the progress of clinical trials that are conducted in
the United States and may, at its discretion, reevaluate, alter, suspend or terminate the testing based upon the data accumulated to that point and the FDAs assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the patient.

Litigation

The Company may become involved in
various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of its business. The Company is not involved in any litigation at this time and is unaware of any claims that may be filed against it.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This
Form 10-Q, including but not limited to this section, may contain forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may
cause our or our industrys actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. These risks and other factors include those listed under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. We believe that the section entitled Risk Factors includes all material risks that could harm our business. In
some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates,
predicts, intends, potential, continue or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

We believe it is important to communicate our future expectations to our investors. However, there may be events in the future that we
are not able to accurately predict or control and that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. Stockholders are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed as a result of various factors, including those factors described in the Risk Factors section of this Form 10-Q. Stockholders should not place undue
reliance on our forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

You should read the following
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing in Item 1. of this Form 10-Q. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis
or set forth elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the Risk
Factors set forth below in this section of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the
following discussion and analysis.

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing new drugs for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases where the growth of new blood vessels can improve the outcome for patients with these diseases. The
active ingredient in our drug candidates, Cardio Vascu-Grow, is designed to facilitate the growth of new blood vessels in the heart and other tissues and organs with an impaired vascular system.

Dr. Stegmann, a founder of the Company, tested a protein drug candidate with the active ingredient that we now call Cardio Vascu-Grow in two separate German clinical trials dating back to
1995. A total of 40 patients were treated with a drug containing Cardio Vascu-Grow, and, in both trials, the drug candidate facilitated the growth of new blood vessels in the heart. We were established in 1998, as a Delaware corporation, to commercialize the results of the clinical research
in cardiovascular disease treatment for No-Option Heart Patients that Dr. Thomas Stegmann performed in the mid-1990s. We entered into an agreement with Dr. Stegmann, dated March 11, 1998 which is superseded by an agreement dated
August 16, 2004, whereby Dr. Stegmann granted to us a non-revocable exclusive perpetual right to use, modify, add to, practice and sell the results of Dr. Stegmanns German clinical trials. Dr. Stegmann will receive a one
percent royalty on all sales of drugs formulated with Cardio Vascu-Grow through December 31, 2013. The grant of rights is perpetual and therefore cannot be terminated by Dr. Stegmann. We have made no royalty payments under this Agreement.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

We have never generated revenues. We expect to incur substantial and increasing losses for at least the
next several years. We do not expect to generate revenues until the FDA approves one of our drug candidates and we begin marketing it. We expect to continue to invest significant amounts on the development of our drug candidates. We expect to incur
significant commercialization costs when we recruit a domestic sales force. We also plan to continue to invest in research and development for additional applications of Cardio Vascu-Grow and to develop new drug delivery technologies.
Accordingly, we will need to generate significant revenues to achieve and then maintain profitability.

Most of our expenditures to date
have been for research and development activities and general and administrative expenses. We conduct research to identify and evaluate medical indications that may benefit from our protein drug candidates. When, in our opinion, the evidence and
results of our research warrant, a potential new drug candidate is graduated from research to development. We classify our research and development into two major classifications: pre-clinical and clinical. Preclinical activities include product
analysis and development, primarily animal efficacy and animal toxicity studies. Clinical activities include FDA (or other countries equivalent regulatory agencies) Investigational New Drug (IND) submissions, the FDA-authorized
trials, and the FDA approval process for commercialization. Research and development expenses represent costs incurred for preclinical and clinical activities. We outsource our clinical trials and our manufacturing and development activities to
third parties to maximize efficiency and minimize our internal overhead. Manufacturing is outsourced to an affiliated entity. We expense our research and development costs as they are incurred.

These additional expenses are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with clinical trials and the FDA review and approval process. As a
result, these additional expenses could exceed our estimated amounts, possibly materially. We are uncertain as to what we expect to incur in future research and development costs for our preclinical activities as these amounts are subject to the
outcome of current preclinical activities, managements continuing assessment of the economics of each individual research and development project and the internal competition for project funding.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related expenses and general corporate activities, and through September 30,
2006, have focused primarily on the activities of administrative support, marketing, intellectual property rights, corporate compliance and preparing us to be a public company. We anticipate that general and administrative expenses will increase as
a result of the expected expansion of our operations, facilities and other activities associated with the planned expansion of our business, together with the additional costs associated with operating as a public company. We will incur sales and
marketing expenses as we build our sales force and marketing capabilities for our drug candidates, subject to receiving required regulatory approvals. We expect these expenses to be material.

Market Opportunity

According to the American Heart
Association 2006 Update, blockage of coronary arteries resulting in severe damage to the heart is the number one cause of death in the United States. The American Heart Association 2006 Update indicates that nearly 38% of all deaths in the United
States were caused by cardiovascular disease, with over half of these deaths due to coronary artery disease. We are now working with a team of experienced drug development scientists and business professionals to confirm the medical benefit of our
drug candidate for heart disease patients for which traditional medical therapies no longer are available (so called No-Option Heart Patients), with the active ingredient, Cardio Vascu-Grow, in FDA authorized Phase I clinical,
trials which we commenced in November 2003. All patients have been enrolled and treated as of March 2006. Final safety data for this trial is being compiled for submission to the FDA. A Phase II clinical trial protocol has been finalized with input
from Kendle, Inc., the clinical contract research organization that will carry out our multi-site, international Phase II trial. Presently, it is anticipated that we will be responsible for the registration of our drug candidates for sale in the
United States and eventually, if approved, we will also handle the sale and distribution of our drug candidates in the rest of North America, Europe and Japan. In the remaining international marketplaces, if approved, we anticipate selling our drug
through affiliated or unrelated regional distributors.

The market for wound healing includes diabetic, bedridden and elderly patients that
suffer from wounds, open sores and diabetic ulcers. According to the US Healthcare Finance Administration, approximately 2.5 to 3.0 million patients a year suffer from these maladies. Annual treatment costs in the United States alone are in the
range of $5-7 Billion. Our IND Application to the U.S. FDA has been allowed, and the FDA has authorized us to commence a Phase I clinical trial in diabetic patients who have foot ulcers and/or open leg wounds.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is a disease in which the arteries of the leg become blocked, leading, in
many cases, to intense pain and suffering for these patients. The active ingredient in the our drug candidate for PAD is Cardio Vascu-Grow, and it has proven to be a potent stimulator for growing new blood vessels in affected areas of the legs
of rabbits, thereby providing blood perfusion to the leg. In its most severe form, PAD can lead to extensive tissue loss and gangrene, which for many patients results in amputation of the limb. Though many therapies are being developed to treat PAD,
there are an increasing number of limb amputations in such patients, many of whom suffer from diabetes. According to the American Heart Associations 2006 report, there are 8 million Americans suffering from this malady. The Company has
received authorization from the FDA to initiate a Phase I safety trial in patents with intermittent claudication, a form of PAD.

Stroke is
the third leading cause of death in the United States. The American Heart Association reports each year about 700,000 people experience a new or recurrent stroke in the U.S. The cost to treat and care for the nearly 5.5 million stroke patients
in the United States was nearly $57.9 Billion in 2006. We have completed stroke recovery studies in animals, which indicate and confirm that our Stroke Recovery drug candidate could significantly reduce the volume of stroke in animals.

Scientific Overview

Cardio Vascu-Grow, the
active ingredient in our drug candidates, is a protein, and is a member of the fibroblast growth factor family. Fibroblast growth factor-1, or FGF-1, is a powerful stimulator of new blood vessel growth, a process referred to in the scientific
community as angiogenesis. FGF-1 stimulates the growth and multiplication of the two main cell types of blood vessels, smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells. Extensive work by us and others has shown that, when FGF-1 is injected into
the hearts of animals with experimentally induced heart disease, new blood vessels grow in the injected areas. Proteins such as Cardio Vascu-Grow represent a novel way to circumvent clogged arteries in patients with heart disease.

The first clinical study performed by our co-founder, Dr. Thomas Stegmann, from 1995 to 1997 in Fulda, Germany. A drug containing Cardio
Vascu-Grow was injected directly into the wall of the heart of 20 patients with coronary artery disease. These patients were also receiving a coronary by-pass procedure on another affected artery. A control group of 20 patients received
by-pass surgery alone. The patients treated with Cardio Vascu-Grow showed a significant increase in localized blood vessel growth at the site of injection, and importantly, these vessels persisted when examined at a three year follow-up
examination. The blood vessel growth determined to be statistically significant over controls at both six months (P-value less than 0.005) and three years (P-value less than 0.005) following injection of Cardio Vascu-Grow.

In the scientific and medical research communities, the term statistically significant means that a particular experimental test has a P-value of less
than 0.05. P-values are calculated from experimental variations typically seen in scientific or medical testing. Thus, if the blood vessel growth in the German clinical tests had reflected P-values of greater than 0.05, the growth would have been
deemed to be statistically insignificant. As a tests P-value decreases below 0.05, the more statistically significant the result is deemed to be in the scientific and medical research communities.

The amount of blood vessel growth in the heart muscle was determined by angiograms wherein a dye was injected into the affected areas. New blood vessel
growth was measured through digital photographic analysis of the dyed areas, a process referred to in the scientific research community as the mean gray value, or gray value, analysis. The gray value measurements for the heart muscles injected with
Cardio Vascu-Grow, and the control group which did not receive the injections, at three months after surgery and three years after surgery were as follows:



|              |  |                       |  |                     
|------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------
|              |  | 3 MonthsAfter Surgery |  | 3 YearsAfter Surgery
|Test Group    |  | 59                    |  | 65                  
|Control Group |  | 20                    |  | 18                  



37



---

##### Table of Contents

This analysis of the results between the Test Group and the Control Group reflected an approximately
three-fold increase in vascular density in the treated areas in the Test Group as compared to the Control Group at both measurement times.

Statistical analysis of the gray value data was performed using standard Students t-tests. Students t-tests are commonly used in scientific research for statistical analysis. They are used to calculate P-values to determine
statistical significance.

A limitation of the first clinical study was the difficulty in determining medical benefits due to the bypass
surgery versus Cardio Vascu-Grow because both were administered at the same time. Due to those limitations, a second clinical study of 20 patients was performed from 1998 through 1999, where Cardio Vascu-Grow injections were used as the
sole therapy. There was no control group in this study for ethical reasons, as administration of the placebo would have required surgery. The results obtained from the second study demonstrated:



| |  |  | No adverse events from the growth factor injection;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 80% of patients showed a significant improvement in their exercise tolerance test (P-value less than 0.001);
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Blood flow into the heart muscle under stress showed a significant increase in tests that measure blood flow (P-value less than 0.001);
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | No significant adverse safety effects of the therapy; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Importantly, 90% of patients (18 out of 20) had an improvement in their dominant clinical symptom, chest pain, showing an improvement of at least one class in an
anginal survey which divides chest pains into four increasingly severe categories. For two of the patients, their angina pain scores remained the same. During the stress exercise test for those patients, chest pain was either completely absent, or
began at much higher levels of exertion for each patient.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Although both clinical studies in Germany reached their
clinical endpoints, and no significant adverse safety events attributable to the drug were observed, such studies were done with a limited population. While the results were encouraging in these earlier studies, there is no assurance that they will
be replicated in our FDA authorized trials, or, even if replicated, that the FDA will approve our No-Option Heart Patient drug candidate, in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient, for commercial use. The results of these German
studies were published in peer reviewed cardiology journals.

Research and Development

Our research and development is focused on developing new drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient for the treatment of
cardiovascular diseases where the growth of new blood vessels can improve the outcome for patients with these diseases. We conduct research to identify and evaluate medical indications that may benefit from our drug candidates. When, in our opinion,
the evidence and results of our research warrant, a potential new drug candidate is graduated from research to development. Each of our drug candidates follows a similar development pathway. Our first step is animal studies. We look for the correct
biological response of drug candidates, Cardio Vascu-Grow in animal models of cardiovascular disease. We also do toxicity studies where we will look for any expected or unexpected side effects of our products compared to similar products on
the market, if such products exist. We will then initiate our clinical development program, which will commence with the submission of an IND application to the U.S. FDA. If approved, it will allow us to begin our human studies. With each protein
product in development, we agree with the FDA on a case-by-case basis the extent of clinical testing we must perform.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

As of October 30, 2006, we had three scientist employees, sixteen scientists under contract with our
contract manufacturer, a related party, and two other individuals involved in research and development activities under contract. Their tasks included overseeing preclinical testing, researching other medical uses of Cardio Vascu-Grow and
preparing and filing various regulatory documents with the FDA. In addition, these personnel are responsible for establishing that the quality of Cardio Vascu-Grow used in the clinical trials meets the specifications required by the FDA.

We incurred research and development costs for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and 2006 (unaudited) and
the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) to September 30, 2006 (unaudited), of $2,266,631, $4,756,693 and $14,234,206, respectively.

Our clinical research and development projects include:

Clinical Development

No-Option Heart Patients. As of September 30, 2006, we have completed the enrollment and treatment of all patients specified in
our Phase I clinical trial protocol. A total of 21 patients were treated at six participating U.S. medical centers that were managed by our contract clinical research organization.

We are currently collecting the final safety data at 12 month follow-up visits on our patients who were treated in our Phase I clinical trial. We are in
the process of filing a report with the FDA listing any adverse events or other safety issues observed in this trial up to and including the 12 week follow-up visit of all patients who participated in this trial. We have finalized the development of
a clinical protocol for our next Phase II study, where we will test our drug candidate in an expanded patient population in both U.S. and foreign clinical trial sites. We have chosen a new clinical research organization, Kendle, to oversee and
manage our international Phase II trial.Given the uncertainty of drug candidate progress due to the FDAs control over the course and timing of our clinical trials, we now estimate the injections into patients for our Phase II and pivotal Phase
III clinical trials should be completed in 2009.

We spent $2,113,472 and $1,804,086 for the nine month periods ended September 30,
2005 and 2006 and $6,875,891 since our inception on our No-Option Heart Patient drug candidate. We estimate spending over $30,000,000 over the next three years on the No-Option Heart Patient indication.

Wound Healing.During the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, we were authorized by the FDA to conduct clinical testing
of our wound healing drug candidate, in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient, in patients with diabetic foot ulcers or venous stasis leg wounds. This Phase I study in which eight patients will receive either a low or high dose
application of our wound healing drug candidate has been initiated at two clinical sites located in the Pittsburgh, PA area. As of September 30, 2006, two patients have been dosed, and we anticipate the clinical trial to be completed in the
fourth quarter of 2006. Previously, we completed animal studies that demonstrated that our wound healing drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient was a safe and efficacious agent in healing wounds in diabetic mice. In
addition, it was demonstrated that little, if any, of our wound healing drug candidate was absorbed into the blood stream after topical application to the wound surface. Similar absorption studies are being conducted in patients in our Phase I
clinical trial.

We spent $167,653 and $316,777 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and $513,258 since our
inception in 2005 of the Wound Healing program conducting our pre-clinical studies to support the IND submission. We estimate spending over $10,700,000 over the next three years on clinical trials for the Wound Healing indication.

Peripheral Artery Disease. Lower extremity Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) occurs in the blood vessels of the legs and feet. PAD is
a progressive disease that involves the hardening and narrowing of the arteries due to a gradual buildup of plaque. PAD of the lower extremities is a major cause of diminished ability to walk, and advanced cases can lead to leg amputation. PAD in
the U.S. affects about 8 million patients, with hospitalization of about 250,000 patients annually. An area of research we are exploring is growing new blood vessels with a PAD drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active
ingredient that may improve the blood supply to the legs and feet to decrease pain and prevent tissue loss. We are collaborating with a research institute that has conducted two animal efficacy studies for us at a cost of $120,000. Injections of our
PAD drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient were given 3 times a week for a 2-week period into the ischemic leg. Results from these studies demonstrated that our PAD drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is
the active ingredient caused a statistically significant increase in new blood vessel formation and iliac blood flow in the legs of the treated animals. Toxicity studies to support an IND application to the U.S. FDA have been completed at a cost of
approximately $63,000. In addition, a clinical protocol for a PAD Phase I study in diabetic patients has been prepared at a cost of $100,000 and was submitted to the FDA for their review in August 2006. We have received FDA authorization to initiate
our Phase I clinical trial in PAD patients suffering from intermittent claudication and anticipate beginning treating patients in the first quarter of 2007.

We spent $133,177 and $359,726 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and $505,679 since our inception of the PAD program in 2005, in our pre-clinical trials to support an IND submission for
this indication to the FDA. Once our IND is authorized to begin, we currently estimate spending over $11,000,000 over the next three years on clinical trials for the PAD indication.

Chronic Back Pain and Lumbar Ischemia. Chronic back pain has recently been linked in published reports to blockage of blood vessels
supplying the lower back, leading to a condition referred to as lumbar ischemia. European medical researchers have speculated that chronic back pain resulting from blockage of blood vessels in the lower back precedes the blockage of coronary
arteries in the heart by ten years. In April we signed a collaborative research and development agreement with the global clinical contract research organization, bioRASI, which is a part of The Russian Academy of Science. We have initiated a Phase
I clinical trial in Russia and Serbia in 2006 to test whether our Lumbar Ischemia drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient can successfully treat chronic back pain. We have completed animal toxicity studies to support
the safety of our product for this proof of concept clinical trial. Clinical protocols were submitted to regulatory authorities in Russia and Serbia who have authorized the start of this clinical study in which 32 patients (four groups of 8 patients
each) will receive 4 increasing doses of Cardio Vascu-Grow . The patients will be followed for a decrease in back pain, as determined by standardized back pain questionnaires, as well as increased blood perfusion into their lower back muscles
as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). If the results of the proof of concept clinical trial in Russia and Serbia are positive, we plan to then file an IND application with the U.S. FDA to allow a Phase I human trial to begin in chronic
back pain patients in the U.S.

We have incurred total costs of $8,683 and $752,148 during the nine month periods ended September 30,
2005 and 2006 and $760,831 since the inception in 2005 of the lumbar ischemia program in our pre-clinical studies. We anticipate spending over $10,000,000 over the next three years on pre-clinical and clinical studies for the Lumbar Ischemia
indication if, in our opinion, the results of our pre-clinical studies and proof of concept trial continue to warrant progressing this drug candidate.



39



---

##### Table of Contents

Pre-Clinical Development

Stroke. According to the American Heart Association 2006 Update, stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States behind cardiovascular disease and cancer. Those who survive a
stroke almost always live with some diminished capacity. Animal studies conducted by J.L. Ellsworth and associated persons, reported in the 2003 edition ofJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism published by Lippincott
Williams & Wilkens, Inc., have shown the potential of growth factor therapy in limiting the severity of brain damage after a stroke. A stroke is characterized by an area of the brain where the brain cells are dead and cannot grow back.
However, surrounding this area of dead cells is an area of damaged living cells that are capable of being restored if an increased blood supply can be provided. This is our initial target area for treatment with our stroke drug candidate in which
Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient.

Three animal studies for stroke have been completed, and these studies indicated and
confirmed that our stroke drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient could significantly reduce the volume of stroke in the animals. The studies also indicated that the drug could be administered up to 8 hours after the
onset of stroke, and still reduce the volume of stroke in the animals. Most stroke patients do not arrive to the hospital until 3 to 6 hours after stroke symptoms, and thus, our stroke drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active
ingredient has the potential to still be effective in this 3 to 6 hour timeframe.

A second focus of our Stroke program is in the area of
Stroke Recovery, where we are analyzing whether our drug candidate, in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient, can diminish the area of a stroke when administered days or weeks after the stroke has occurred. In this setting we will
examine whether Cardio Vascu-Grow can repopulate the stroke area in the brain with new nerve cells, a process termed neurogenesis. We have initiated animal studies in the stroke recovery area, and initial results obtained from these
animal studies indicate that Cardio Vascu-Grow can reduce stroke volume size in these animals when administered over a 1 month period. We will continue our pre-clinical research in this area by examining the effect of different doses of Cardio
Vascu-Grow in diminishing the stroke volume in this animal model.

We have incurred total costs of $44,000 and $103,915 during the
nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 and $162,915 since the inception of the stroke program, in our pre-clinical studies.

Chronic Back Pain and Lumbar Ischemia. A second aspect of our clinical program in patients with chronic back pain is to examine the role, if any, of underperfusion of the interspinal discs plays in causing back pain. We
have contracted, for $150,000 per year, a noted orthopedic surgeon, Vance Gardner, M.D. to lead our efforts in this area. We have contracted with the Orthopaedic Education and Research Institute of Southern California, of which Dr. Garner is
the executive director, to perform a clinical study on approximately 50 patients who are undergoing disc replacement surgery. After institutional review board (IRB) approval, this study will initiate. The study will involve the use of MRI to examine
discs for signs of underperfusion, and whether this lack of blood flow to one or more discs is a consistent finding in patients with chronic back pain and disc degeneration. The cost of this 50 patient study will be approximately $170,000 and will
take approximately 6 months to complete.



40



---

##### Table of Contents

Pre-clinical Research

We are continuing our research to identify and evaluate medical indications that may benefit from our drug candidates. The results of our research in addition to our evaluation of the market place potential warrant,
our potential determine whether we graduate a new drug candidate from research to development.

Two new initiatives have become the area of
pre-clinical research. The first initiative involves examining the potential of Cardio Vascu-Grow to be utilized as a potential new therapeutic for the treatment of osteoporosis. In previous studies, it has been demonstrated that human
fibroblast growth factor-1, the active protein in Cardio Vascu-Grow, is a potent inducer of new bone formation in an animal model of osteoporosis. We have hired, as a consultant, an internationally recognized expert in the field of
osteoporosis, Dr. Michael Rosenblatt of the Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, at a fee of $1667 per month, to lead this initiative. Over the next 6-9 months he will test the activity of Cardio Vascu-Grow to reverse bone loss
in an animal model of osteoporosis at a cost of approximately $70,000.

A second pre-clinical initiative that has begun is the testing of
Cardio Vascu-Grow in animal models of diabetes. We are examining whether Cardio Vascu-Grow can act as a specific growth factor for the beta cells of the pancreas, the cells that are responsible for the production of insulin in our
bodies. Diabetic animal models in which beta cells have been depleted will be used to test the regenerative capacity of Cardio Vascu-Grow to induce new beta cell growth. These animal studies will continue over the next 6 months and be carried
out at a cost of approximately $47,000 by Perry Scientific, a contract research laboratory in San Diego, CA.

In other areas of
pre-clinical research, we are continuing our activities for indications in the heart with Adjunct to Bypass Surgery, Diffuse Heart Disease, and Catheter Based Delivery. In the area of wound healing, we are continuing our research in Bed Sores,
Anastomoses and Surgical Incisions. In the nerve tissue area, we are continuing our research in Diabetic Neuropathy and Acute Ischemic Stroke. In the digestive system area, we are continuing our research in Intestinal Ischemia. In the area of bone
and connective tissue, we are continuing our research in Bone Fracture Repair, Cartilage Repair, and Avascular Necrosis. Lastly, we are continuing our research in Kidney Ischemia.

Business Strategy

Business Opportunity

According to the American Heart Association Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics2006 Update, $257 billion dollars are estimated to be spent in the US
on direct health care costs associated with treating and caring for patients with cardiovascular diseases and stroke in 2006. Of this total, $50 billion is expected to be spent on medical durables in 2006. Additionally, the cost in the US of lost
productivity and morbidity of patients with cardiovascular diseases and stroke is estimated in this report to total $146 billion in 2006. This totals an estimated $403 billion of direct and indirect costs in the US associated with cardiovascular
diseases and stroke in 2006. The prevalence and cost of cardiovascular disease and stroke in the US is growing and far exceeds that of cancer and HIV. We believe there is a significant and growing business opportunity for new drugs that can address
cardiovascular diseases and stroke.



41



---

##### Table of Contents

We will focus first on the growth of new blood vessels in patients with coronary heart disease. According
to the American Heart Association, Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics2006 Update, over $142.5 billion per year is spent on drugs that treat coronary heart diseases. Traditional treatments include open heart by-pass procedures, balloon
angioplasty procedures to open blocked arteries, insertion of stents into blocked arteries and selected drugs including nitrates that dilate the coronary arteries. If the clinical trials continue to be successful, we believe that treatment with our
No-Option Heart Patient drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient can lower the overall cost of treating coronary heart disease. This analysis reinforces our decision to make the treatment of coronary heart disease the
first market for development.

We are researching other potential applications for Cardio Vascu-Grow in humans with different types
of vascular disease. As mentioned above, medical conditions other than blocked coronary arteries that are also characterized by blocked blood vessels may also be amenable to this therapy. This may include people with diabetes who suffer from
restricted blood flow to their legs due to clogged arteries, leading to amputations every year. In addition, Cardio Vascu-Grow may be useful in the treatment of certain forms of stroke and hypertensive renal disease.

Our goal is to establish our drug candidates with Cardio Vascu-Grow as the active ingredient as an integral part of the treatment regimen for
cardiovascular disease where the growth of new blood vessels can improve the outcome for patients with these diseases.

The key elements of
our strategy are:

Obtain Regulatory Approval of Cardio Vascu-Grow

Our first and primary task is to obtain FDA regulatory approval for our drug candidates with Cardio Vascu-Grow as the active ingredient. We will
continue with our clinical trials until our new drug candidates for No-Option Heart Patients, Wound Healing, and other new drug candidates are approved for commercial sale. At the same time we file for approval in the United States, we will file for
approval to the European Union. This is done by submitting basically the same approval application to the European Commission, which handles new drug approvals for the entire European Union. We may be required to conduct additional clinical trials
to obtain European approval.

About 12 months prior to the anticipated drug approval by the FDA, we intend to start the process to register
our new drugs with government and insurance companies drug registration payment system in the United States. Most drugs administered to patients in the United States are at least partially reimbursed or paid for by insurance companies, or the
United States Government. Thus, to achieve commercial success, a drug needs to be registered in the drug payment system to be reimbursable.

Our specific goals for 2006 relative to advancing our product development pipeline are as follows:



| |  |  | Complete Phase I, of the No-Option Heart Patients trial.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Initiate and complete the Wound Healing Phase I trial.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Obtain FDA authorization and begin and complete the Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) Phase I trial.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Obtain FDA authorization and begin Phase II in the No-Option Heart Patients trial.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Begin the Proof of Concept trial for Lumbar Ischemia.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Conduct research to understand whether Cardio Vascu-Grow can trigger the growth of new beta cells for insulin production in diabetics.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Obtain FDA authorization and begin our Phase II Wound Healing Trial.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



42



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Conclude our research to understand whether Cardio Vascu-Grow may be a realistic therapy for stroke recovery and intestinal ischemia.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Conduct research to understand whether Cardio Vascu-Grow can trigger myogenesis (growing new heart muscle tissue) in the heart.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our specific goals for 2006 relative to advancing our financial stability are as follows:



| |  |  | Complete a new financing sufficient to fund us at least through the first quarter of 2007.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Have our shares listed on an exchange.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | Increase the awareness about our Company in the general public and the investing public, with institutional investors, the medical community, and with payers.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Explore opportunities for a collaborative research and business relationship with a medical imaging company.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Establish Marketing, Sales and Distribution

About the same time that we start the drug registration process for each of our drug candidates, we intend to start implementing our marketing and sales program for the new drug candidate. We may enter into a
marketing arrangement with a partner in the United States and/or Europe between now and the time of such approval. However, assuming we have no marketing and distribution partner, we are in the process of developing an independent marketing and
sales program. In that regard, we have entered into a distribution agreement with Cardio Phage International, an affiliated Bahamas corporation, or CPI, to handle future distribution of our approved drugs and any other products which we might
license to CPI. CPIs territory is limited to areas other than the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, the Republic of Korea, China and Taiwan. We have made no payments to, or received payments from, CPI and do not anticipate any such
payments in the near future. Pursuant to this agreement, CPI is obligated to pay us an amount equal to 50% of its gross revenues from sales of our products after deducting CPIs direct and certain indirect costs. This agreement has a term of 99
years. In addition, we have entered into an agreement with Korea Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd., or KBDC, an affiliated company, to commercialize, manufacture and sell our products for a period of 99 years in all of Korea, China and Taiwan. As
part of that transaction, KBDC arranged for the purchase of 8,750,000 of our shares of common stock for $3,602,000. KBDC also agreed to fund all of the regulatory approval process in Korea for any of our products. KBDC will pay a royalty to us equal
to ten percent of its net revenues from the sale of our products.

Customer Motivation

We believe there are four categories of customers for Cardio Vascu-Grow: the patient, the patients doctor, the hospital, and the payer. We
believe the payer is almost as important as the patient and his or her doctor. Other than the patient, the payer for a medical treatment can be a government agency, an insurance company, an HMO plan or a self-insured business. We believe that
acceptance of a new medical treatment option will succeed more rapidly if the payers support that treatment. Therefore, we plan to address the motivation our treatment offers with those who pay the bills for the treatment.

The important considerations of the payer are quality of care and medical costs in the form of the price of drugs and services. We believe our
pharmaceutical treatment for heart disease could significantly lower the cost of treating some coronary and other vascular diseases and improve quality of care by reducing the need for more invasive cardiac or vascular surgery. We believe our
pharmaceutical treatment for wound healing could significantly improve quality of care by potentially closing wounds that other treatments may not be closing.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

No-Option Heart Patients

These potential customers are those people whose doctors have informed them that presently there exists no traditional medical treatment for their heart
disease condition. These patients condition could be the result of having already received heart by-pass surgery, the result of a heart transplant, or other medical conditions where traditional medical treatments are not applicable. Based on
the opinion of medical experts reported in the February 14, 1998 Wall Street Journal, we believe the marketplace of this No-Option Heart Patients category in the United States alone approximates 150,000 new patients every year. Based on the
results of Dr. Stegmanns second clinical study in Germany, we believe both potential patients and their doctors should be very interested in our new drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the
active ingredient as treatment to grow new blood vessels for the human heart around clogged arteries.

Specific Marketing and Sales
Plan for our drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients. We will market our drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients to the patient community through targeted advertising efforts. Likewise, we will target members of the medical
profession who specialize in heart disease. Most of our marketing campaign will involve raising customer awareness in patients, doctors and payers. A person with a heart problem does not have to be sold hard to save his or her life; he or she simply
needs to be aware the treatment exists. Our marketing strategy will be based upon the premise that the four customer groups (payers, hospitals, doctors and patients) have different senses of urgency. These factors influence desire to adopt and time
for adoption by a given customer group. If our drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients delivers the benefits we hope to demonstrate, patients desire to either live or enjoy an improved quality of life should exert significant demand on
doctors and hospitals to provide our drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients and procedure. If our drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients delivers the benefits we hope to demonstrate, and if the results of the benefits of the drug include a
decrease in the need for, and cost of, repeat angiograms and subsequent treatment for recurrent angina, we then believe the cost savings to payers may exceed the cost of the drug. Then, payers desires to save costs and/or improve profits
should exert demand on hospitals and doctors to provide our drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients and procedure. Accordingly, we intend to market our product by creating demand from payers and patients and acceptance from hospitals and
doctors.

Specifically, we will (1) market economics and patient care to payers to secure reimbursement agreements, (2) market to
the leading cardiac hospitals the economics and patient care in an effort to have the product adopted as Standard of Care, which status will aid in marketing to the other cardiac hospitals, (3) market patient care and economics to
the doctors, and (4) market a state of well being to patients. We engaged consultants who have studied programs to market to hospitals and patients. We have also conducted conferences across the country, marketing to doctors. We have
consultants working on economic models for marketing to payers.

Sales and distribution will be developed concurrently with our primary
marketing efforts. We will require a sales staff to cover the major cardiac hospitals and medical groups. We may develop that ourselves or work with other drug distribution channels. If our treatment is accepted by the cardiovascular surgeons, as
well as the cardiologists and the hospital administration at the particular location, then the function of our sales and marketing team would be greatly reduced.

In the area of distribution, the drug kit for our drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients is expected to be about the size of a small lunch box. It can be delivered via overnight shipment. There are some special
handling needs and the shipping kit can be constructed to satisfy those requirements.

Specific Marketing and Sales Plan for Our Drug
Candidate for Wound Healing. We are currently formulating our sales and marketing plan for our drug candidate for Wound Healing. We anticipate that the strategy may be similar to the strategy for sales and marketing of our drug candidate for
No-Option Heart Patients.

Facilities

We have signed a 7 year lease for a fully built-out laboratory facility in the San Diego area. This space comprises approximately 5000 square feet and is equipped with wet labs, chemical hoods, and a fully functional vivarium, in
which small animal efficacy experiments can be performed. The lease rate is approximately $14,000 per month. We anticipate hiring approximately 6 scientists over the next 12 month period to staff this pre-clinical research lab.



44



---

##### Table of Contents

Manufacturing

Phage Biotechnology Corporation, an affiliated company (Phage), manufactures our pharmaceutical products in its new laboratory production facility in San Diego, California, and is our sole source of supply. Phage has developed a
proprietary manufacturing process to produce protein pharmaceutical products. To date, Phage has manufactured all the clinical doses required for our ongoing and soon to commence Phase I clinical trials and has the manufacturing capacity to provide
product for the Phase II and III trials as well. Additionally, we are investigating other outsourced contract manufacturers as a backup to Phage should there ever be any interruption in supply or capacity issues.

Based on the FDAs previous reviews of investigational drug applications submitted by Phage, we believe Phages manufacturing operations are in
compliance with regulations mandated by the FDA for Phase 1 and Phase II trials. However, Phages current or future facilities would need to be certified as a GMP facility by the FDA in order for it to begin manufacturing commercial quantities
of our drug candidates for sale, and there can be no assurance that Phages current or future facilities would be so certified. As part of the ongoing clinical trials, the FDA reviewed documentation of Phages manufacturing process and
quality control systems and the clinical trial was authorized to commence. As part of the federal regulatory approval for Cardio Vascu-Grow, a facility inspection will occur by the FDA.

For details about our contract with Phage to develop and manufacture our drug candidates see Item 3. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of OperationsContractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments, Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and BusinessPatents and Proprietary Technology.

Collaboration

We continue to be open to and to evaluate the economic
benefits of collaborations on research and development activities for individual or groups of potential new drug candidates in our product pipeline. In this regard, we currently are explaining obtaining commercial rights to human fibroblast growth
factor-1 mutants that may have enhanced stability or potency as a therapeutic agent.

Training

The procedure to administer our drug candidate for No-Option Heart Patients is a relatively simple procedure for a cardiac surgeon. The procedure to
administer our drug candidate to PAD patients is a relatively simple procedure for a vascular surgeon. Based on discussions with surgeons participating in our current clinical trial, no additional training for surgeons that will administer the drug
in the future will be needed. The procedure for administering our drug candidate for Wound Healing is also a relatively simple procedure for health care providers of applying a salve to the wound. We believe that no additional training for
administering the drug in the future will be needed.

Competition

Currently, we are not aware of anyone injecting a fibroblast growth factor protein into the wall of the heart to stimulate the growth of new blood vessels in No-Option Heart Patients. There are a number of companies
which are pursuing a gene-therapy based approach. Mytogen, Inc. acquired from GenVec, Inc. the rights to a gene therapy agent know as Bio-bypass and is currently conducting a Phase II trial in 126 patients in Europe. Results from this
trial have not been announced. Boston Scientific Corporation, a maker of catheters, and Corautus Genetics Inc. disclosed last year that they have entered into an alliance to develop a gene therapy technology to treat coronary artery disease in which
the gene will be delivered via a catheter. No efficacy results for this approach have yet been made public, however in March 2006 the FDA placed this clinical trial on hold due to reported serious adverse events. We are also aware of several
commercial firms active in pre-clinical research in regenerating blood flow to the heart. We believe most of this research involves gene therapy which may involve more patient risk, as no gene therapy has been approved by the FDA. Other companies,
including Aventis and Corautus Genetics, have clinical programs aimed at growing new blood vessels in the legs of diabetics,



45



---

##### Table of Contents

again, are using a gene-therapy approach. In the area of wound
healing, Genentech, Inc. is performing a Phase II trial in diabetic wound healing, evaluating the protein growth factor vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF). In addition, Johnson & Johnson has a marketed growth factor
product with the name Regranex®. See also Risk FactorsRisks Related to the
CompanyCompetition and technological change may make our products and technology less attractive or obsolete.

Patents and
Proprietary Technology

Pursuant to an ownership and license agreement with Phage, we and Phage each have an undivided half ownership
interest in the U.S. and foreign patent rights necessary to develop and commercialize drug products containing Cardio Vascu-Grow. All patent rights were owned by Phage prior to the agreement. In consideration of Phages assignment to us
of a half ownership interest in the patent rights, we agreed to pay Phage for technical development services related to the manufacture of Cardio Vascu-Grow and the formulation of the drug candidates, and to either purchase the drug candidates
from Phage for 10% of the net sales price or pay Phage a royalty of 6% of our net sales price if we obtain the drug candidates from any other source.

We entered into this joint ownership arrangement in order to protect us from any issues arising from research that may be conducted by Phage on our behalf that could have possible adverse affects on patentability of
findings from this research. Under U.S. patent law, common ownership of patents and patent applications covering related developing technologies provides potential advantages related to patentability of inventions. For example, prior art developed
by Phage related to methods of producing proteins other than Cardio Vascu-Grow cannot render obvious (un-patentable) our patent claims related to methods of making and using Cardio Vascu-Grow , where the subject matter is commonly owned.

Phage has granted to us a non-revocable and exclusive worldwide license (including the right to sublicense to third parties) to the
patents necessary to develop and commercialize drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient. As a part of that agreement, Phage will provide technical development services to us for the development and regulatory
approvals of our drug candidates, including but not limited to, lab work, testing and production of our drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient for clinical trials, all as directed by us. We pay Phages actual
direct cost of service (direct, indirect and overhead costs with no profit component) for such development services.

In addition, at our
election, we will either (i) purchase the bulk product from Phage for a price equal to ten percent of our net sales price of the drug product or (ii) pay Phage a six percent royalty on the net sales price of our drug product which is
produced by another contract manufacturer or by us. It is our expectation that we will acquire our drug products from Phage; however, we are able to use another contract manufacturer or manufacture it ourselves.

The agreement with Phage has no termination provision and expires on the last to expire of the applicable patent rights involved, currently
August 15, 2021, but the agreement will automatically be extended for a period equal to the expiration date of any newly filed patent applications. During the term of the agreement, Phage and we are jointly responsible for filing and
maintaining all patents and applications that involve Cardio Vascu-Grow, including splitting related costs.

Under this arrangement,
we have an undivided half interest in four issued U.S. patents, one U.S. patent application that is pending, and all foreign patent applications related to the U.S. patents and applications.

We have no joint ownership agreements with any entity that is conducting research on our behalf other than the joint ownership agreement with Phage;
however, we might consider engaging in such an arrangement again to protect intellectual property in which we acquire or develop an interest.

We require our employees to execute confidentiality agreements in connection with their employment with us. We also require our employees, consultants and advisors who we expect to work on our products to agree to



46



---

##### Table of Contents

disclose and assign to us all intellectual property beneficial to us or conceived using our property or which relates to
our business. Phage follows similar policies. Despite any measures taken to protect our intellectual property, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Finally,
our competitors may independently develop similar technologies. Because of the importance of our patent portfolio to our business, we may lose market share to our competitors if we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, which may entail
great expense.

The biopharmaceutical industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent litigation based
on allegations of patent infringement. As the number of entrants into our market increases, the possibility of a patent infringement claim against us grows. While we make an effort to ensure that our products do not infringe other parties
patents and proprietary rights, our products and methods may be covered by United States patents held by our competitors. In addition, our competitors may assert that future products we may market infringe their patents.

Government Regulation

Regulation by government
authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture and marketing of products such as ours and in our ongoing research and product development activities. As noted above, our drug candidates
will require regulatory approval by government agencies prior to commercialization. In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous preclinical studies and clinical trials and other approval procedures of the FDA and similar
regulatory authorities in foreign countries. Various federal and state statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage and record keeping related to such products and their marketing. The process
of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent substantial compliance with appropriate federal and state statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.

Preclinical studies are generally conducted in laboratory animals to evaluate the potential safety and the efficacy of a product. Drug developers submit
the results of preclinical studies to the FDA as a part of an investigative new drug application (IND), which must be approved before clinical trials in humans may begin. Typically, clinical evaluation involves a time consuming and costly
three-phase process.



|          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|--------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Phase I   |  | Clinical trials are conducted with a small number of subjects to determine the early safety profile, maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of the product in human
volunteers.                                           
|          | 
|Phase II  |  | Clinical trials are conducted with groups of patients afflicted with a specific disease in order to determine preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages and expanded evidence of
safety.                                           
|          | 
|Phase III |  | Large scale, multi-center, comparative trials are conducted with patients afflicted with a target disease in order to provide enough data to demonstrate with substantial evidence the efficacy
and safety required by the FDA.

The FDA closely monitors the progress of clinical trials that are conducted in the United States
and may, at its discretion, reevaluate, alter, suspend or terminate the testing based upon the data accumulated to that point and the FDAs assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the patient.

Once Phase III trials are completed, drug developers submit the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials to the FDA in the form of a new drug
application (NDA), or a biologics licensing application (BLA) for approval to commence commercial sales. Currently, all current and planned drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient are designated as a biologics and
will be required to file a BLA, which has, as one of its approval components, an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility producing the biologic. Following review of the clinical data and the facility inspection, the FDA may grant marketing
approval, request additional information or deny the application if the FDA determines that the application does



47



---

##### Table of Contents

not meet regulatory approval criteria. FDA approvals may not be granted on a timely basis, or at all. Furthermore, the
FDA may prevent a drug developer from marketing a product under a label for its desired indications, which may impair commercialization of the product. Similar regulatory procedures must also be complied with in countries outside the United States.

If the FDA approves an NDA or BLA, the product becomes available for physicians to prescribe in the United States. After approval, the
drug developer must submit periodic reports to the FDA, including descriptions of any adverse reactions reported. The FDA may request additional clinical studies, known as Phase IV, to evaluate long-term effects.

In addition to studies required by the FDA after approval, a drug developer may conduct other trials and studies to explore use of the approved compound
for treatment of new indications. The purpose of these trials and studies and related publications is to broaden the application and use of the drug and its acceptance in the medical community.

Approvals Outside the United States

We will have to
complete an approval process similar to that in the United States in virtually every foreign target market for our products in order to commercialize our product candidates in those countries. The approval procedure and the time required for
approval vary from country to country and may involve additional testing. Foreign approvals may not be granted on a timely basis, or at all. In addition, regulatory approval of prices is required in most countries other than the United States. We
face the risk that the resulting prices would be insufficient to generate an acceptable return to us.

Fast Track Designations

Congress enacted the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, in part, to ensure the timely availability of safe and effective drugs,
biologics and medical devices by expediting the FDA review process for new products. The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act establishes a statutory program for the approval of so-called fast track products. The new law defines a fast
track product as a new drug or biologic intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition that demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a condition. Under the new fast track program, the sponsor of a new
drug or biologic may request the FDA to designate the drug or biologic as a fast track product at any time during clinical development of the product. Fast track designation provides an expedited review of a product, which accelerates FDA review.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments related to these estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various
other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.



48



---

##### Table of Contents

While our significant accounting estimates are more fully described in our financial statements appearing
in this Form 10-Q, we believe that the following accounting policies relating to stock-based compensation charges are most critical to aid you in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.

Stock Based Compensation. We account for stock option grants to employees using the fair value method prescribed in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and FIN 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation. In March 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based compensation. It also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. Since we have has historically followed the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the adoption of SFAS No. 148 has had no impact to our
financial position or results of operations. However, our financial statement disclosures have been designed to conform to the new disclosure requirements that SFAS No. 148 prescribes.

We account for stock option and warrant grants issued to non-employees using the guidance of SFAS No. 123R and EITF No. 96-18, Accounting
for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, whereby the fair value of such option and warrant grants is determined using the Black-Scholes Model at the
earlier of the date at which the non-employees performance is completed or a performance commitment is reached.

Valuation of
Derivative Instruments. FAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining
the appropriate fair value, we use the Black-Scholes Model. Derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as Adjustments to Fair
Value of Derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants are valued using Black-Scholes Models.

Research and Development Costs. We account for research and development costs in accordance with SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs. Research and development costs are charged to operations as
incurred.

Development Stage Enterprise. We are a development stage company as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises. We are devoting substantially all of our present efforts to its formation, fundraising, and product development and approval. Its planned
principal operations of selling its pharmaceutical products have not yet commenced. For the period from March 11, 1998 (inception) through September 30, 2006 (unaudited), we have accumulated a deficit of $29,067,964. There can be no
assurance that we will have sufficient funds available to complete its research and development programs or be able to commercially manufacture or market any products in the future, that future revenue will be significant, or that any sales will be
profitable. We expect operating losses to increase for at least the next several six months due principally to the anticipated expenses associated with the proposed product development, clinical trials and various research and development
activities.

Employees and Other Personnel

As of October 16, 2006, we had a total of twenty-one employees, nineteen of whom were full-time. Three of the nineteen full-time employees are in research and development, and sixteen are in operations and administration. We had total
of twenty independent contractors or subcontractor personnel with sixteen people in research and development, including clinical development and four people in operation and administration. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and
we believe we have good employee relations.



49



---

##### Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Nine months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

Our activities during the nine month period ended
September 30, 2006 consisted almost entirely of research and development and general corporate activities to support our FDA clinical trials. Research and development expenses increased 110% from $2,266,631 to $4,756,693 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

The increase of $2,490,062 is due to increased clinical costs of $964,399 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in clinical costs is due to:

Our No-Option Heart Patient Phase I trial
is now complete with respect to the patient injections and we are compiling the data for submission to the FDA. We are currently collecting the final safety data at 12 month follow-up visits on our patients who were treated in our Phase I clinical
trial. We are in the process of filing a report with the FDA listing any adverse events or other safety issues observed in this trial up to and including the 12 week follow-up visit of all patients who participated in this trial. We have finalized
the development of a clinical protocol for our next Phase II study, where we will test our drug candidate in an expanded patient population in both U.S. and foreign clinical trial sites. We have chosen a new clinical research organization, Kendle to
oversee and manage our international Phase II trial. Given the uncertainty of drug candidate progress due to the FDAs control over the course and timing of our clinical trials, we now estimate the injections into patients for our Phase II and
pivotal Phase III clinical trials should be completed in 2009.

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, we were
authorized by the FDA to conduct clinical testing of our wound healing drug candidate, in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient, in patients with diabetic foot ulcers or venous stasis leg wounds. This Phase I study in which eight
patients will receive either a low or high dose application of our wound healing drug candidate has been initiated at two clinical sites located in the Pittsburgh, PA area. As of September 30, 2006, two patients have been dosed, and we
anticipate the clinical trial to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2006. Previously, we completed animal studies that demonstrated that our wound healing drug candidate in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient was a safe and
efficacious agent in healing wounds in diabetic mice. In addition, it was demonstrated that little, if any, of our wound healing drug candidate was absorbed into the blood stream after topical application to the wound surface. Similar absorption
studies are being conducted in patients in our Phase I clinical trial.

A clinical protocol for a PAD Phase I study in diabetic patients
has been prepared at a cost of $100,000 and was submitted to the FDA for their review in August 2006. We have received FDA- authorization to initiate our Phase I clinical trial in PAD patients suffering from intermittent claudication and anticipate
beginning treating patients in the first quarter of 2007.

The increase in research and development costs was also due to salaries and
benefits of employees of $1,106,079, and R&D operating expenses of $369,154 as we continue to add resources to this function. As of October 16, 2006, we had three scientist employees, sixteen scientists under contract with our contract
manufacturer, a related party, and two other individuals involved in research and development activities under contract as compared to three scientist employees, twelve scientists under contract with our contract manufacturer, Their tasks included
overseeing preclinical testing, researching other medical uses of Cardio Vascu-Grow and preparing and filing various regulatory documents with the FDA. In addition, these personnel are responsible for establishing that the quality of Cardio
Vascu-Grow used in the clinical trials meets the specifications required by the FDA.



|                             |  |                                         |           |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |     |  
|---------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | ------- | --------- |  | --- | -
|                             |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |          
|                             |  | 2005                                    |           | 2006 |   | $ Change  |  | %Change |          
|Research and development (a) |  | $                                       | 2,266,631 |      | $ | 4,756,693 |  | $       | 2,490,062 |  | 110 | %
|                             |  |                                         |           |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |     |  

|(a) | Includes $415,337 and $1,820,227 paid to Phage Biotechnology Corporation
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

General and administrative expenses increased 34% from $6,577,642 to $8,801,457 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively. The increase of $2,223,815 is as a result of a substantial
increase in our marketing expenses of $1,338,000 as we became more active in our corporate development and investor relations activities and contributions to a non-profit medical education organization of $214,000. Related to these activities, our
travel expense increased $174,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the year ago period.

Another
increase in administrative expenses relates to opening our corporate office in Las Vegas our rent has increased $89,000 and the increase in staff size to 16 full time, 2 part time and 4 contractors from 8 full time employees and 8 contractors staff
resulting in an increase in staff salaries of $217,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the year ago period.

In addition to staffing our computer expenses have increase accordingly as we now are running on our network and have improved our redundancy and back-up capabilities resulted in an increase of $413,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the year ago period.

Our legal and professional expenses have increased approximately $247,000 as
we have stepped up our corporate activities and complying with Sarbanes Oxley requirements during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the year ago period.

Other increased expenditures include insurance of $140,000 which is mostly related to our increased D&O costs,



|                               |  |                                         |           |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |    |  
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | ------- | --------- |  | -- | -
|                               |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |          
|                               |  | 2005                                    |           | 2006 |   | $ Change  |  | %Change |          
|General and administrative (b) |  | $                                       | 6,577,642 |      | $ | 8,801,457 |  | $       | 2,223,815 |  | 34 | %
|                               |  |                                         |           |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |    |  

|(b) | Includes $148,507 and $121,575 paid to Phage Biotechnology Corporation
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Interest income increased to $604,774 from $209,255 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This is a result of a higher level of cash and marketable securities available for
investment from the sale of $20,000,000 of the convertible senior secured notes in March 2006 and increased interest rates available on money market securities.



50



---

##### Table of Contents

|                |  |                                         |         |      |   |          |  |         |         |  |     |  
|--------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | ------- | ---- | - | -------- |  | ------- | ------- |  | --- | -
|                |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |        
|                |  | 2005                                    |         | 2006 |   | $ Change |  | %Change |        
|Interest income |  | $                                       | 209,255 |      | $ | 604,774  |  | $       | 395,519 |  | 189 | %
|                |  |                                         |         |      |   |          |  |         |         |  |     |  

Interest expense increased 126% to $3,588,970 from $1,589,485 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest expense for 2006 represents interest on senior secured convertible notes payable quarterly, and includes non-cash charges to interest expense for amortization of deferred financing costs of
$273,214 and amortization of discount for the fair value of derivatives of $1,861,101 aggregating $2,134,315 of interest expense from amortization. The 2005 interest charge includes similar non-cash charges of $712,461 related to charging off the
unamortized deferred debt financing costs, and $710,001 of unamortized debt discount.



|                 |  |                                         |           |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |     |  
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | ------- | --------- |  | --- | -
|                 |  | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |          
|                 |  | 2005                                    |           | 2006 |   | $ Change  |  | %Change |          
|Interest expense |  | $                                       | 1,589,485 |      | $ | 3,588,970 |  | $       | 1,999,485 |  | 126 | %
|                 |  |                                         |           |      |   |           |  |         |           |  |     |  

Adjustments to fair value of derivatives arose in the period ended September 30, 2006 as the
Company entered into a financial transaction that contained embedded derivatives in the notes and derivate features in the warrants. In addition, the Company recorded an option and warrant derivative for outstanding and vested non-employee warrants
and options on the date of the financial transaction and re-valued theses same non-employee options and warrants at September 30, 2006. These derivative features are required to be re-valued at fair market value at each measurement date. The result
of re-valuing these derivative features as of September 30, 2006 resulted in a charge to the Statement of Operations of $16,631,560.

The
following table shows the change in the fair value of the derivatives that are included in the Statement of Operations as of September 30, 2006:



|                                                  |  |                             |            |                     |   |             |                                                            |  |                   |         |  |                                 |            |   |  |   |          
|------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------- | - | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- |  | ------------------------------- | ---------- | - |  | - | ---------
|                                                  |  | Fair Value atMarch 30, 2006 |            | Change in FairValue |   |             | Additions DeletionsFor New IssuancesConversions, Exercises |  | Adjustmentsto PIC |         |  | Fair Value atSeptember 30, 2006
|Convertible note embedded and warrant derivatives |  | $                           | 10,578,898 |                     | $ | (8,632,765  | )                                                          |  | $                 | 0       |  | $                               | (322,939   | ) |  | $ | 1,623,194
|Warrant and Option Derivatives Non-Employees      |  |                             | 12,209,055 |                     |   | (7,998,795  | )                                                          |  |                   | 801,250 |  |                                 | (1,074,000 | ) |  |   | 3,937,510
|                                                  |  |                             |            |                     |   |             |                                                            |  |                   |         |  |                                 |            |   |  |   |          
|Change in Fair Value                              |  |                             |            |                     | $ | (16,631,560 | )                                                          |  |                   |         |  |                                 |            |   |  |   |          
|                                                  |  |                             |            |                     |   |             |                                                            |  |                   |         |  |                                 |            |   |  |   |          

Three months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

Our activities during the three month period ended September 30, 2006 consisted almost entirely of research and development and general corporate
activities to support our FDA clinical trials. Research and development expenses increased 45% from $1,071,517 to $1,555,211 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

The increase of $483,694 is due to increased clinical costs of $177,004 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and the clinical costs are due
to:

In the third quarter of 2006, we have finalized the development of a clinical protocol for our next Phase II study, where we will test
our drug candidate in an expanded patient population in both U.S. and foreign clinical trial sites. We have chosen a new clinical research organization, Kendle, to oversee and manage our international Phase II trial. Given the uncertainty of drug
candidate progress due to the FDAs control over the course and timing of our clinical trials, we now estimate the injections into patients for our Phase II and pivotal Phase III clinical trials should be completed in 2009.

In the third quarter of 2006, we started the Phase I study in which eight patients will receive either a low or high dose application of our wound
healing drug candidate has been initiated at two clinical sites located in the Pittsburgh, PA area. As of September 30, 2006, two patients have been dosed, and we anticipate the clinical trial to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2006.

In the third quarter of 2006, we completed a clinical protocol for a PAD Phase I study in diabetic patients has been prepared at a cost of
$100,000 and was submitted to the FDA for their review in August 2006. We have received FDA- authorization to initiate our Phase I clinical trial in PAD patients suffering from intermittent claudication and anticipate beginning treating patients in
the first quarter of 2007.

The clinical cost increase is also due to salaries and benefits of employees of $215,425, and operating
expenses of $75,329 as we continue to add resources to this function. As of October 16, 2006, we had three scientist employees, sixteen scientists under contract with our contract manufacturer, a related party, and two other individuals
involved in research and development activities under contract as compared to three scientist employees, twelve scientists under contract with our contract manufacturer, Their tasks included overseeing preclinical testing, researching other medical
uses of Cardio Vascu-Grow and preparing and filing various regulatory documents with the FDA. In addition, these personnel are responsible for establishing that the quality of Cardio Vascu-Grow used in the clinical trials meets the
specifications required by the FDA.



|                             |  |                                          |  |           |  |          |  |         |  
|---------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | -------- |  | ------- | -
|                             |  | For the Three Months Ended September 30, | 
|                             |  | 2005                                     |  | 2006      |  | $ Change |  | %Change |  
|Research and development (a) |  | 1,071,517                                |  | 1,555,211 |  | 483,694  |  | 45      | %
|                             |  |                                          |  |           |  |          |  |         |  

|(a) | Includes $191,106 and $1,013,773 paid to Phage Biotechnology Corporation
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

General and administrative expenses decreased 6% from $3,363,393 to $3,150,552 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, respectively. The decrease of $212,841 is related to a decrease of $69,000 in
amortization of stock options, reduction of $19,556 in office expenses, and decrease in postage and shipping of $14,265 for the three months ended September 30, 2006.

There was an increase of $316,000 in our marketing expenses of as we became more active in our corporate development and investor relations activities
and contributions to a non-profit medical education organization of $153,000. Related to these activities, our travel expense increased $35,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the year ago period.

Another increases in administrative expenses relate to opening our corporate office in Las Vegas our rent has increased $17,000 and the increase
in staff size to 16 full time, 2 part time and 4 contractors from 8 full time employees and 8 contractors staff resulting in an increase in staff salaries of $105,000, for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 respectively.

In addition to staffing our computer expenses have increase accordingly as we now are running on our network and have improved our
redundancy and back-up capabilities resulted in an increase of $153,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the year ago period.

Our legal and professional expenses have increased approximately $75,000 as we have stepped up our corporate activities and complying with Sarbanes Oxley requirements during the nine months ended September 30,
2006 as compared to the year ago period.



51



---

##### Table of Contents

Other increased expenditures include insurance of $40,000 which is mostly related to our increased D&O
costs.



|                               |  |                                     |           |      |   |           |  |          |         |  |    |  
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | -------- | ------- |  | -- | -
|                               |  | For the Three Months Ended Sept 30, |          
|                               |  | 2005                                |           | 2006 |   | $ Change  |  |          | %Change | 
|General and administrative (b) |  | $                                   | 3,363,393 |      | $ | 3,150,552 |  | (212,841 | )       |  | -6 | %
|                               |  |                                     |           |      |   |           |  |          |         |  |    |  

|(b) | Includes $70,760 and $25,434 paid to Phage Biotechnology Corporation
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------

Interest income increased to $205,830 from $86,001 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This is a result of a higher level of cash and marketable securities available for
investment from the sale of $20,000,000 of the convertible senior secured notes in March 2006 and increased interest rates available on money market securities.



|                |  |                                          |        |      |   |          |  |         |  |     |  
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | -------- |  | ------- |  | --- | -
|                |  | For the Three Months Ended September 30, |       
|                |  | 2005                                     |        | 2006 |   | $ Change |  | %Change | 
|Interest income |  | $                                        | 86,001 |      | $ | 205,830  |  | 119,829 |  | 139 | %
|                |  |                                          |        |      |   |          |  |         |  |     |  

Interest expense increased to $1,775,719 from $37,539 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest expense for 2006 represents interest on senior secured convertible notes payable quarterly and includes non-cash charges to interest expense for amortization of deferred financing costs of
$273,214 and amortization of discount for the fair value of derivatives of $1,861,101 aggregating $2,134,315 of interest expense from amortization.



|                 |  |                                          |        |      |   |           |  |           |  |      |  
|---------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | --------- |  | --------- |  | ---- | -
|                 |  | For the Three Months Ended September 30, |       
|                 |  | 2005                                     |        | 2006 |   | $ Change  |  | %Change   | 
|Interest expense |  | $                                        | 37,539 |      | $ | 1,775,719 |  | 1,738,180 |  | 4630 | %
|                 |  |                                          |        |      |   |           |  |           |  |      |  

Adjustments to fair value of derivatives arose in the period ended Sept 30, 2006 as we
entered into a financing transaction that contained embedded derivatives in the notes and derivate features in the warrants. In addition, we recorded option and warrant derivatives for outstanding and vested non-employee warrants and options on the
date of the financing transaction and revalued these same non-employee options and warrants at September 30, 2006. These derivative features are required to be re-valued at fair market value at each measurement date. The result of re-valuing these
derivative features as of September 30, 2006, was a non-cash income item to the statement of operations of $8,000,197.

The following
table shows the change in the fair value of the derivatives that is included in the Statement of Operations as of September 30, 2006:



|                                                  |  |                              |           |                     |   |            |                                                             |  |                   |         |  |                              |          |   |  |   |          
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | --------- | ------------------- | - | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- |  | ---------------------------- | -------- | - |  | - | ---------
|                                                  |  | Fair Value At March 31, 2006 |           | Change inFair Value |   |            | Additions Deletions For new issuances conversion, exercises |  | Adjustmentsto PIC |         |  | Fair Value At Sept. 30, 2006
|Convertible Note Embedded and Warrant Derivatives |  | $                            | 6,832,091 |                     | $ | (4,941,277 | )                                                           |  | $                 |        |  | $                            | (267,620 | ) |  | $ | 1,623,194
|Warrant and Option Derivatives Non-Employees      |  |                              | 7,285,805 |                     |   | (3,058,920 | )                                                           |  |                   | 400,625 |  |                              | (690,000 | ) |  |   | 3,937,510
|                                                  |  |                              |           |                     |   |            |                                                             |  |                   |         |  |                              |          |   |  |   |          
|Change in Fair Value                              |  |                              |           |                     |   | (8,000,197 | )                                                           |  |                   |         |  |                              |          |   |  |   |          
|                                                  |  |                              |           |                     |   |            |                                                             |  |                   |         |  |                              |          |   |  |   |          



52



---

##### Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

Since our inception and through September 30, 2006, we have financed our
operations through the initial public offering of our common stock, the private sale of our capital stock and our convertible notes and the private placement of senior secured convertible notes. Through September 30, 2006, we have received net
proceeds of approximately $50,427,847 from the issuance of shares of common stock, convertible preferred stock and convertible notes payable and the private placement of senior secured convertible notes. The table below summarizes our sales of
equity securities and convertible notes through September 30, 2006.





|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |  |   |            |              | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- | ------------ | 
|Security                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |   |            | Net Proceeds
|Convertible preferred stock converts to common stock at 100/1, non-voting, no dividend                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  | $ | 520,400   
|Common Stock                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |   | 3,904,000 
|Total net proceeds from issuance of Pre-IPO convertible notes payable                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |   | 12,756,487
|Net proceeds from the initial public offering 1,725,000 shares of common stock sold at $10.00 per share net of the underwriters discount of 7% and non-accountable
expenses of 2.75%                                                                                                                          |  |   | 14,681,460
|Option exercises 388,466 stock option exercised                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |  |   | 212,506   
|Net proceeds from private placement of secured convertible notes of $20,000,000 Senior secured notes with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of Companys common stock at $8.50 per share and notes
convertible into shares of common stock at $12 per share, net of closing fees and investment banking fees |  |   | 18,447,000
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |  |   |           
|Total net proceeds from financings through September 30, 2006                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |  | $ | 50,521,853



|                                           |  |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | - | ---------- | -
|Deferred financing cost pending London IPO |  |   | (94,006    | )
|                                           |  |   |            |  
|Net Proceeds per statement of cash flow    |  | $ | 50,427,847 |  
|                                           |  |   |            |  

As of September 30, 2006, we had $13,034,971 in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash.
We believe that our cash will be sufficient to fund reduced operations by progressing only our Wound Healing Indication through at least the first quarter of 2008. This would be a dramatic decrease to all our drug development and corporate
activities.

On March 20, 2006, we completed the Private Placement of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to
purchase 705,882 shares of our common stock. We will incur certain penalties if we fail to file and obtain and maintain the effectiveness of a registration statement covering the Securities, such as cash payments to the note holders calculated under
formulas based on the principal amount of the notes and aggregate exercise price of the warrants. A total of $1,553,000 in transaction fees and expenses paid by us, such that we realized net proceeds in the amount of $18,447,000.

On March 20, 2006, Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman, Co-President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all of our
obligations resulting from the sale on March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the later of March 20, 2007 or the first date on which we receive revenue from the sale of
drugs in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient after such drug has been approved by the FDA, provided that on such date we are not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for
the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate upon the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into our common stock.

After our obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano was required to
make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, we will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the
date reimbursed by us.

Income Taxes

At September 30, 2006, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $30,527,319 and $33,478,054, respectively, as compared to $25,700,000 at December 31, 2005,
which expire through 2020. The utilization of net operating loss carry forwards may be limited due to the ownership change under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and similar state provisions. The company also has a federal
research and development credit carry forward of $172,834.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company recognized
certain tax benefits in amount of $610,000 related to temporary differences and recorded a valuation allowance against these tax benefits of an equal amount.



53



---

##### Table of Contents

At September 30, 2006, we had deferred tax assets representing primarily the benefit of net
operating loss carry forwards. We did not record a benefit for the deferred tax asset because realization of the benefit was uncertain and, accordingly, a valuation allowance is provided to offset the deferred tax asset.

Cash Flow

Nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, our operating activities consumed cash of $13,680,056, an increase of $4,496,348
over the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Our activity level in 2006 increased dramatically over the level of activity in 2005 in both research and development activities and our general and administrative activities because we were able
to raise cash through our IPO in February 2005 and the private placement of secured convertible notes in March of 2006. This liquidity allowed us to proceed with increased drug development activities and clinical trials in No Option heart,
Wound healing and Peripheral Artery Disease, add needed administrative capability and personnel, resume our marketing activities, and move forward with preparing us to be a public company.

Purchase of restricted cash investments consumed $33,532 of cash combined with $578,427 of capital expenditures for property and equipment, resulting in
$611,959 of cash consumed in investing activities for the period ended September 30, 2006, which was an increase of $502,224 over the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

Financing activities generated $18,481,501 of cash during the nine month ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $3,373,245 over the nine months
ended September 30, 2005. This increase is primarily related to proceeds from the private placement of the senior secured convertible notes payable and option exercises during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 exceeding the proceeds
from our IPO during the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

Funding Requirements

Over the next 12 months, we expect to devote substantial resources to continue our research and development efforts and to develop our sales, marketing
and manufacturing programs associated with the anticipated future commercialization and launch of our drug candidates. Our funding requirements will depend on numerous factors, including:



| |  |  | the number, scope and results of our clinical trials;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | advancement of other uses for our product candidate into development;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the timing of, and the costs involved in, obtaining regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the cost of commercialization activities, including product marketing, sales and distribution;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims and other patent-related costs, including litigation costs, if any,
and the result of such litigation; our ability to establish, enforce and maintain collaborative arrangements and activities required for product commercialization; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our revenues, if any, from successful development and commercialization of our potential products.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We do not expect to generate significant additional funds unless and until we obtain marketing approval for, and begin selling, one of our new drug
candidates. We believe that the key factors that will affect our internal and external sources of cash are:



| |  |  | our ability to successfully obtain marketing approval for and to commercially launch one of our new drug candidates;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the success of our other preclinical and clinical development programs; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the receptivity of the capital markets to financings by biotechnology companies.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Based on historical as well as budgeted expenditures, we believe that our current available cash will be sufficient to fund reduced operations by
progressing only our Wound Healing Indication through Phase III through at least the first quarter of 2008. This would be a dramatic decrease to all our drug development and corporate activities.

We will need to raise additional external funds in the future through the sale of additional equity or debt securities to continue to develop our drug
candidates at our current rate of expenditure. The sale of additional equity securities will result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Additional financing may not be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are
unable to obtain additional financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of, delay or eliminate some or all of our planned research, development and commercialization activities, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.



54



---

##### Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as of September 30, 2006:



|                               |  |       |            |                  |   |           |  |           |            |                   |   |           |  |   |        
|------------------------------ |  | ----- | ---------- | ---------------- | - | --------- |  | --------- | ---------- | ----------------- | - | --------- |  | - | -------
|                               |  | Total |            | Less than 1 Year |   | 1-3 Years |  | 3-5 Years |            | More than 5 Years
|Long-term debt obligations(a)  |  | $     | 19,704,277 |                  |   |          |  | $         | 19,704,277 |                   |   |          |  |   |       
|Operating lease obligations(b) |  | $     | 2,772,250  |                  | $ | 220,956   |  | $         | 981,752    |                   | $ | 1,100,062 |  | $ | 469,480
|                               |  |       |            |                  |   |           |  |           |            |                   |   |           |  |   |        
|Total                          |  | $     | 22,476,527 |                  | $ | 220,956   |  | $         | 20,686,029 |                   | $ | 1,100,062 |  | $ | 469,480
|                               |  |       |            |                  |   |           |  |           |            |                   |   |           |  |   |        



|(a) | We sold $20,000,000 of notes that have a floating interest rate of 3 month LIBOR plus 7%. We have the option to pay the interest with registered common stock (see footnote 9).
During the third quarter of 2006, Noteholders converted $295,723 of the convertible senior secured notes to 110,500 shares of the Companys common stock for an average share price of $2.76 (including 28,000 committed shares).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | In November 2005, we entered into an operating lease agreement for office space in Las Vegas, Nevada, which requires monthly payments of approximately $17,900. We have one five year
option to renew the lease. Building operating expenses are reconciled annually, and any increase over the base year is billed pro rata among the buildings tenants. We occupied this property in March 2006. The five year lease obligation is
approximately $1,060,000. Cardio entered into a second amendment on September 8, 2006, for the expansion space use of administrative offices in Las Vegas. Cardio will pay approximately $585,594 in base rent for the expansion space throughout
the term of the lease. Cardio entered into a Lease Agreement dated August 7, 2006 with Nancy Ridge LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for the use of general office and laboratory space in San Diego, CA. The Lease commences on
September 1, 2006 and expires on May 13, 2013, at which time the Company will have the option of extending the lease by five years on the same terms and conditions of the Lease. The Company has paid Nancy Ridge a fully refundable security
deposit in the amount of $57,804, and further agrees to pay $15,228 per month for the term of the Lease for the use of 6,768 square feet of general office and laboratory space.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our major outstanding contractual obligations are summarized on the table below:

The service fees for the obligations below were determined through a process of competitive bids and/or negotiation. Our major outstanding contractual
obligations are summarized below:



|           |  |                                                                                |  |                                                                                          |  |           |  |                                                     
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|ItemNumber |  | Contract                                                                       |  | Agreement Name                                                                           |  | Start     |  | End Date                                            
|1          |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Technical Services Agreement                                                             |  | 1-Mar-00  |  | 1-Mar-20                                            
|2          |  | Cardio Phage International (CPI)                                             |  | Distribution agreement                                                                   |  | 16-Aug-04 |  | 16-Aug-13                                           
|3          |  | Korea Bio-Development Corporation                                              |  | Manufacturing and distribution agreement                                                 |  | 15-Dec-00 |  | 15-Dec-99                                           
|4          |  | Hesperion, Inc. (TouchStone, formerly Clinical CardioVascular Research, LLC) |  | Clinical development of investigational drugs and devices for cardiovascular indications |  | 24-Oct-01 |  | ongoing                                             
|5          |  | Dr. Thomas Stegmann                                                            |  | Royalty agreement                                                                        |  | 16-Aug-04 |  | 31-Dec-13                                           
|6          |  | Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc.                                    |  | Product development                                                                      |  | 1-Jun-04  |  | Upon delivery of and payment for catheters          
|7          |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Lease Guarantee Irvine                                                                   |  | 1-Sep-04  |  | 31-Aug-06                                           
|8          |  | JDM Consulting                                                                 |  | Marketing and Mailing                                                                    |  | 11-Mar-06 |  | 1-Oct-06                                            
|9          |  | bioRASI, LLC                                                                   |  | CRO agreement                                                                            |  | 8-Aug-05  |  | Completion of clinical trial                        
|10         |  | Phage Biotechnology                                                            |  | Lease Guarantee - San Diego                                                              |  | 15-Mar-06 |  | 15-Aug-13                                           
|11         |  | Promethean                                                                     |  | Convertible Notes                                                                        |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | 19-Mar-09                                           
|12         |  | Daniel C. Montano                                                              |  | Guarantee agreement                                                                      |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | first date of generating revenue                    
|13         |  | Daniel C. Montano                                                              |  | Guarantee reimbursement agreement                                                        |  | 20-Mar-06 |  | first date of generating revenue                    
|14         |  | Capital Financial Media                                                        |  | Investor relations                                                                       |  | 6-Jul-06  |  | Upon distribution of report on the Company          
|15         |  | Kendle (formerly Charles River)                                                |  | CRO agreement                                                                            |  | 8-Aug-06  |  | Completion of Phase II Severe Coronary Heart Disease
|16         |  | The Bruckner Group                                                             |  | Feasibility Study                                                                        |  | 4-Aug-06  |  | Upon completion of study                            
|17         |  | Zimmerman Adams International                                                  |  | Investing banking                                                                        |  | 6-Jun-06  |  | ongoing                                             

---

|1) | We agreed to jointly own and license from one another the right to use certain patents including the patents related to FGF-1141. As part of that agreement, at our election, we are
obligated to either (i) pay to Phage ten percent of our net sales or our drugs manufactured for us by Phage or (ii) pay to Phage a six percent royalty based on our drugs which Phage does not manufacture for us.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) | CPI will act as distributor for the products of both Phage and us in locations throughout the world other than United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, China, and the Republic of
Korea. CPI is obligated to pay us an amount equal to 50% of CPIs gross revenue from sales of our product less CPIs direct and indirect costs.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3) | As part of this agreement, KBDC arranged the purchase of 8,750,000 shares of our common stock for $3,602,000 by Cardio Korea, Ltd. KBDC agreed to fund all of the regulatory approval
process in Korea for any of our products. In addition, KBDC agreed to pay us a royalty of ten percent net revenue from sales in its Asian territories.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4) | Hesperion will assist us with the FDA approval process for our drug.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------

|5) | Our royalty agreement with Dr. Stegmann will provide him with a one percent royalty on net revenue from the sale of our drug candidates, if any, measured quarterly and payable 90
days after quarter end.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|6) | Catheter and Disposables Technologies, Inc. will assist us to design, develop, and fabricate two different prototype catheter products that will allow the administration of
CVBT-141A by catheter procedures.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|7) | This lease is for 11,091 rentable square feet and provides for a monthly rent of approximately $35,500 plus shared building operating expenses. This lease and the Companys
guarantee expired in September 2006.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|8) | This agreement is for implementing a wide range of marketing and shareholder awareness program.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|9) | This agreement is for the purpose of assisting in our human clinical trials in Russia. bioRASI is the strategic initiative of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) and is
responsible for commercializing RAS bio-sciences and clinical resources. bioRASI is a contract research organization (CRO) providing services for its collaborative R&D clients in the areas of drug development, biologicals, and medical
devices.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|10) | This agreement is for a new manufacturing facility in San Diego, CA. The lease provides for Minimum Monthly Rent and Additional Rent for shared costs, which aggregate approximately
$20,000 per month.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|11) | We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain investors to place $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of our common
stock. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time at $12 per share (the Fixed Conversion Price). In addition, the notes are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of the average of the
preceding five days weighted average trading price, if the result is lower than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into our common stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no more than 10% of the original
$20,000,000 note balance per calendar month. The notes mature in March 2009, and bear a resetting floating interest rate of three month LIBOR plus 7%. The warrants may be exercised anytime up to March 2009. The warrant exercise price is $8.50 per
share. Substantially all of the Companys assets secure the notes.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|12) | Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman, Co-President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed any and all of our obligations resulting from the sale on March 20,
2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the first date on which we receive revenue from the sale of drugs with FGF-1141 as API after such drug has been approved by the FDA, provided that on such
date we are not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate upon the payment in
full of the notes including conversion of the notes into our common stock.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|13) | After our obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano was required to make any payments pursuant
to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, we will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the date reimbursed by us.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|14) | This agreement is for the purpose of preparing and distributing information about the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|15) | Kendle (formerly Charles River Laboratory) will support us in our Phase II Severe Coronary Heart Disease clinical trial ensuring that the protocol and study adhere to FDA regulatory
requirements. The total direct and indirect costs are estimated to be $3,917,810.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|16) | The Bruckner Group Incorporated will assist us in exploring the potential economic consequences of applying FGF-1141 to a variety of clinical scenarios and patent types. This
project will take 16 to 20 weeks with approximate total cost of $475,000.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|17) | The purpose of this consulting agreement is to audit our interim financial reports for the purpose of proposed admission document to AIM (London Stock Exchange). We will pay
Zimmerman 100,000 GBP before admission to AIM and another 50,000 GBP in January 2007.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                               |  |                                    |           |                                                                  |   |           |  |   |           
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | --------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | - | --------- |  | - | ----------
|                                               |  | For the Quarter EndedSeptember 31, |           | For the Period fromMarch 11, 1998(Inception) toSeptember 31,2006
|                                               |  | 2005                               |           | 2006                                                             |  
|Service Fees Paid for Above Contracts:         |  |                                    |           |                                                                  |   |           |  |   |           
|Hesperion (formerly TouchStone Research, Inc.) |  | $                                  | 822,307   |                                                                  | $ | 1,508,867 |  | $ | 4,492,162 
|bioRASI                                        |  |                                    | 104,082   |                                                                  |   | 668,220   |  |   | 848,279   
|BS Biology                                     |  |                                    |          |                                                                  |   |          |  |   | 370,000   
|Da Vinci Biomedical Research                   |  |                                    |          |                                                                  |   |          |  |   | 431,698   
|Catheter and Disposables Technologies          |  |                                    | 31,240    |                                                                  |   | 18,534    |  |   | 68,126    
|JDM Consulting                                 |  |                                    | 1,133,000 |                                                                  |   | 1,460,000 |  |   | 2,593,000 
|Capital Financial Media                        |  |                                    |          |                                                                  |   | 870,000   |  |   | 870,000   
|Kendle                                         |  |                                    |          |                                                                  |   | 772,236   |  |   | 772,236   
|Bruckner Group                                 |  |                                    |          |                                                                  |   | 237,500   |  |   | 237,500   
|Zimmerman Adams International                  |  |                                    |          |                                                                  |   | 93,760    |  |   | 93,760    
|                                               |  |                                    |           |                                                                  |   |           |  |   |           
|Total                                          |  | $                                  | 2,090,629 |                                                                  | $ | 5,629,117 |  | $ | 10,776,761



55



---

##### Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

At September 30, 2006, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would
have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Recently Issued
Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets
(SFAS NO. 156), which provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Statement (1) requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it
undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations; (2) requires that a separately recognized servicing asset or servicing liability be initially measured at fair value, if
practicable; (3) permits an entity to choose either the amortization method or the fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of separately recognized servicing assets or servicing liabilities; (4) permits at initial
adoption a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities by an entity with recognized servicing rights, provided the securities reclassified offset the entitys exposure to changes in the fair value of the
servicing assets or liabilities; and (5) requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the balance sheet and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing
assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption
permitted in certain circumstances. The Statement also describes the manner in which it should be initially applied. The Company does not believe that SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or
cash flows

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes  An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return that results in a
tax benefit. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on de-recognition, income statement classification of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the application of FIN 48 will have on its results of operations and financial condition.



56



---

##### Table of Contents

In September, 2006, FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, was issued by the FASB. This
new standard provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The FASB believes the standard also responds to investors requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and
liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. Statement 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, but
does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. Currently, over 40 accounting standards within GAAP require (or permit) entities to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. Prior to Statement 157, the methods for measuring fair
value were diverse and inconsistent, especially for items that are not actively traded. The standard clarifies that for items that are not actively traded, such as certain kinds of derivatives, fair value should reflect the price in a transaction
with a market participant, including an adjustment for risk, not just the companys mark-to-model value. Statement 157 also requires expanded disclosure of the effect on earnings for items measured using unobservable data. Under Statement 157,
fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts. In this standard, the FASB clarifies
the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, Statement 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used
to develop those assumptions. The Company is evaluating how SFAS 157 will impact its results of operations and financial position.

In
September, 2006, Staff Accounting Bulletin issued Interpretation No. 108. This new standard provides guidance in processing of qualifying financial statement misstatements. The staff is aware of diversity in practice. For example, certain
registrants do not consider the effects of prior year errors on current financial statements, thereby allowing improper assets or liabilities to remain unadjusted. While these errors may not be material if considered only in relation to the balance
sheet, correcting the errors could be material to the current year income statement. Certain registrants have proposed to the staff that allowing these errors to remain on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities in perpetuity is an appropriate
application of generally accepted accounting principles. The staff believes that approach is not in the best interest of the users of financial statements. The interpretations in this Staff Accounting Bulletin are being issued to address diversity
in practice in qualifying financial statement misstatements and the potential under current practice for the build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet. The Company has adopted this principal to address the qualified financial misstatements
and prior period errors.

Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company may have interest rate
exposure to market risk with its cash and cash equivalents. Interest rates on the Companys money market accounts ranged from 5.07% to 5.14% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The Company invests in high-quality financial instruments,
primarily money market funds, federal agency notes, and United States Treasury Notes, which the Company believes are subject to limited credit risk. The Company does not currently hedge interest rate exposure. The effective duration of the
Companys portfolio is less than three months, and no security has an effective duration in excess of three months. Due to the short-term nature of the Companys investments, the Company does not believe that it has any material exposure
to interest rate risk arising from its investments.

The Company sold floating rate convertible debt securities. At September 30, 2006,
there was $19.7 million of floating rate debt outstanding which is subject to interest rate risk. Interest rates on the Companys convertible notes payable was from 12.14% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Each 100 basis points increase
in interest rates relative to these borrowings would impact annual pre-tax earnings approximately $197,000 and the Companys cash flow should it choose to pay this interest in cash in lieu of paying in-kind.

The Company sold floating rate convertible debt securities that have several derivative features. The value of the derivative features effect the
Companys Statement of Operations and Balance Sheet, but there is no effect on the Companys cash flow.

The value of these
derivatives fluctuate change from period to period until the notes are redeemed or converted. An increase in value of these derivatives will result in the Company having to record an expense to the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives on the
Statement of Operations. Conversely, a decrease in the value of these derivatives will result in the Company having to record income to the Adjustment to Fair Value of Derivatives on the Statement of Operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in
reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the specified time periods and accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The
Companys management evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or
15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of that date, the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (required by paragraph (b) of 13a-15 or 15d-15) were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Control

A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Inherent limitations in all control systems result in the fact that no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been
detected. These inherent limitations include imperfect judgments in decision making and breakdowns due to error or mistake. Also, the design of a control system is based on the occurrence of future events, and no assurance can be given that a system
will succeed in achieving its stated goal under all potential future conditions.



57



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any litigation, nor are there any pending legal
proceedings at this time.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to the Company

We have a history of losses and expect to incur substantial losses and negative operating cash flows for the foreseeable future, and we may never achieve or maintain profitability.

Since our inception, we have incurred significant net losses. As a result of ongoing operating losses, we had an accumulated deficit of $29,067,964 as of
September 30, 2006. We are not currently profitable. Even if we succeed in developing and commercializing our drug candidates, we expect to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future and may never become profitable. We also expect to
incur significant capital expenditures and anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially in the foreseeable future as we:



| |  |  | seek regulatory approvals for our new drug candidates;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | develop, formulate, manufacture and commercialize our new drug candidates;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | implement additional internal systems and infrastructure; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | hire additional clinical, scientific, administrative and sales and marketing personnel.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We also expect to experience negative cash flow for the foreseeable future as we fund our operating losses and capital expenditures. As a result, we will
need to generate significant revenues to achieve and maintain profitability. We do not expect to generate revenues unless one of our drug candidates is approved, and may not be able to generate these revenues even if one is approved. We may never
achieve profitability in the future.

At September 30, 2006, we had $13,034,971 in cash and restricted cash. On March 20, 2006,
we completed the sale of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and related detached warrants for net proceeds of $18,447,000. Although there can be no assurances, we believe that our cash will be sufficient to fund reduced operations by progressing
only our Wound Healing Indication through at least the first quarter of 2008. This would be a dramatic decrease to all our drug development and corporate activities.

If we continue to incur operating losses for a period longer than we anticipate, we will be unable to advance our development program and complete our clinical trials.

Developing a new product and conducting clinical trials for multiple disease indications is expensive. We expect that we will fund our capital
expenditures and operations through at least the first quarter of 2007 with our current resources and the net proceeds of the financing we completed in March 2006. We may need to raise additional capital sooner, however, due to a number of factors,
including:



| |  |  | an acceleration of the number, size or complexity of the clinical trials;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | slower than expected progress in developing our drug candidates;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | higher than expected costs to obtain regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | higher than expected costs to develop or protect our intellectual property; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | higher than expected costs to develop our sales and marketing capability.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



58



---

##### Table of Contents

Violation of covenants and other events of default and triggering events associated with the senior secured notes and
warrants we recently sold could have a significant detrimental effect on our liquidity.

On March 20, 2006, we completed a private
placement (the Private Placement) of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares of the our common stock (the Securities). We will incur certain penalties if we fail to file and
obtain and maintain the effectiveness of a registration statement covering the Securities, such as cash payments to the note holders calculated under formulas based on the principal amount of the notes and aggregate exercise price of the warrants.
We may also incur cash damages if we fail to issue and deliver certificates of our common stock in a timely manner upon receipt of a notice from a note holder to convert all or a portion of the note holders note. We may also be required to
redeem all or a portion of the principal amount of a note in the event a conversion fails. Under certain triggering events, we may be required to redeem all or a portion of the principal amount of a note in the sum of 120% of the principal plus
applicable interest. Examples of triggering events are: (i) delisting of our securities; (ii) failure of a registration statement to be filed; (iii) failure of a registration statement to become effective; and (iv) other
triggering events. Other terms and conditions that are material to us are: (i) after a triggering event, the holder of a note has the option to require us to pay a redemption price at the option of a note holder, (ii) a redemption in the
event of a change in control at the option of a note holder, (iii) certain events of default, and (iv) the acceleration of payment of a note upon the occurrence of an event of default.

If we are unable to comply with the terms and conditions of the senior secured notes and warrants, the results could be a negative and significant impact
on our liquidity, as well as a potential change of control of the Company.

In the future, we may not be able to raise additional necessary capital on
favorable terms, if at all.

We do not know whether additional financing will be available when needed, or on terms favorable to us or
our stockholders. We may raise any necessary funds through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or additional corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements. To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities,
our stockholders will experience dilution. If we raise funds through debt financings, we may become subject to restrictive covenants. Our recent debt financing is secured by all of the Companys assets. To the extent that we raise additional
funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, we may be required to relinquish some rights to our technologies or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

Cardio Vascu-Grow is currently the only active ingredient in all of our drug products. Because the development of Cardio Vascu-Grow is subject to a
substantial degree of technological uncertainty; we may not succeed in developing it.

Unlike many pharmaceutical companies that have a
number of products in development and that utilize many technologies, we are dependent on our basic drug technology for the success of our company. While our core technology has a number of potentially beneficial uses, if that core technology is not
commercially viable, we currently do not have others to fall back on, and our business will fail.

Our new drug candidates are still in
research and development, and we do not expect them to be commercially available for the foreseeable future, if at all. Only a small number of research and development programs ultimately result in commercially successful drugs. Potential products
that appear to be promising at early stages of development may not reach the market for a number of reasons. These reasons include the possibility that the potential products may:



| |  |  | be found ineffective or cause harmful side effects during preclinical studies or clinical trials;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | fail to receive necessary regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | be precluded from commercialization by proprietary rights of third parties;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | be difficult to manufacture on a large scale; or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | be uneconomical or fail to achieve market acceptance.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------

If any of these potential problems occurs, we may never successfully market products in which the active ingredient is Cardio Vascu-Grow.



59



---

##### Table of Contents

We may not receive regulatory approvals for our new drug candidates.

Regulation by government authorities in the United States and foreign countries is a significant factor in the development, manufacture and marketing of
our new drug candidates and in ongoing research and product development activities. Our new drug candidates are still in research and development and we have not yet requested or received regulatory approval to commercialize any of them from the FDA
or any other regulatory body. The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent substantial compliance with appropriate federal and state statutes and regulations require spending substantial time and financial resources. If we fail to
obtain or encounter delays in obtaining or maintaining regulatory approvals, it could adversely affect the marketing of one or all of our new drug candidates, as well as our liquidity and capital resources.

In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous preclinical testing and clinical trials and other approval procedures of the FDA and
similar regulatory authorities in foreign countries. Various federal and state statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage and record-keeping related to these products and their marketing. Any
delay in, or suspension of, our clinical trials will delay the filing of our applications with the FDA to market the drug in the United States and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize our new drug candidates and generate product revenues.

In connection with our clinical trials, we face the risks that:



| |  |  | we or the FDA may suspend the trials;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | we may discover that Cardio Vascu-Grow may cause harmful side effects;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the results may not replicate the results of earlier, smaller trials;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the results may not be statistically significant;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | patient recruitment may be slower than we expected;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | patients may drop out of the trials;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | patients may die during the trials, even though treatment with our new drug candidates may not have caused those deaths; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | we may not be able to produce sufficient quantities of Cardio Vascu-Grow to complete the trails.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We may encounter delays or difficulties in our clinical trials, which may delay or preclude regulatory approval of our drug candidates.

In order to commercialize our new drug candidates for coronary heart disease treatment and as a wound healing agent, we must obtain regulatory approvals
for that use. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically takes many years, is expensive and involves compliance with requirements covering research and development, testing, manufacturing, quality control, labeling and promotion of drugs for
human use. To obtain regulatory approvals, we must, among other requirements, complete clinical trials demonstrating that each drug candidate is safe and effective for a particular disease treatment.

We have commenced treatment of patients in the planned Phase I clinical trials of our No-Option Heart Patient new drug candidate. The FDA has authorized
a second Phase I trial for diabetic wound healing, which is scheduled to begin in the first half of 2006. Ongoing or future clinical trials may demonstrate that our new drug candidates are neither safe nor effective.

We may encounter delays or rejections in the regulatory approval process because of additional government regulation (FDA or otherwise) during the period
of product development, clinical trials and FDA regulatory review. Such delays or rejections may be caused by failure to comply with applicable penalties, recall or seizure of any approved products, total or partial suspension of production or
injunction, as well as other regulatory action against our drug candidates or us.



60



---

##### Table of Contents

Outside the United States, our ability to market a product is contingent upon receiving clearances from
the appropriate regulatory authorities in the various foreign jurisdictions. These foreign regulatory approval processes each include all of the risks associated with FDA clearance described above.

Failure to retain and recruit qualified scientists will delay our development efforts.

As of October 30, 2006, we had three scientist employees, including John W. Jacobs, Ph.D. and Kenneth A. Thomas, Ph.D., and sixteen scientists under
month to month contracts, including our Co-President and Chief Clinical Officer, Thomas Stegmann, M.D. The loss of any of our lead scientists, Thomas Stegmann, M.D., John W. Jacobs, Ph.D. or Kenneth A. Thomas, Ph.D., could impede the achievement of
our development objectives.

Furthermore, recruiting and retaining qualified scientific personnel to perform research and development work
in the future will also be critical to our success. We may be unable to attract or retain qualified scientific personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among biotechnology, pharmaceutical and health care companies, universities and
non-profit research institutions for experienced scientists.

If any of our key executives discontinue their employment with us, our efforts to develop
our business may be delayed.

We are highly dependent on the principal members of our management team and the loss of our Chairman,
Co-President and Chief Executive Officer, Daniel C. Montano, or our Co-President and Chief Clinical Officer, Thomas Stegmann, M.D. or our Chief Financial Officer, Mickael A. Flaa, or our Chief Operating Officer, John W. Jacobs, could impede the
achievement of our development efforts and objectives.

On August 28, 2006, Alexander G. Montano resigned from the board of directors
of Cardio. Prior to his resignation, Mr. Montano held the position of Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Montanos resignation was based solely upon outside business activities. Specifically, the continued growth of his
financial services firm C.K. Cooper & Company demanded more of his direct attention and focus. His resignation does not reflect any disagreement with management in any way.

On October 3, 2006, Cardio announced that Grant Gordon has been named Vice Chairman of its Board of Directors. Mr. Gordon has more than 28
years of international finance experience raising and managing private assets, as well as institutional investment management.

Prior activities of our
Chief Executive Officer, as well as certain conflicts of interest that he has, may increase the risks of an investment in our company.

Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman of the Board, Co-President, Chief Executive Officer and the owner of 24.75% of the voting control of our company, was engaged in the securities, investment banking and venture capital business for
approximately 30 years ending in 1998. During that time, Mr. Montano or the firms he controlled were the subject of arbitrations, fines, disciplinary actions and sanctions imposed by the SEC and the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (NASD), including a cease and desist order the SEC entered in 1992. The order required that Mr. Montano permanently cease and desist from continuing and causing any further material misrepresentations and/or omitting to state material
facts in the offer or sale of a security. All administrative action was concluded on those matters over five years ago based on events occurring several years before.

The clinical trials of our product under the regulations of the FDA have not been affected by Mr. Montanos prior regulatory issues, and we do not expect them to be. However, to the extent we seek approval
from other regulatory agencies in the future, Mr. Montanos past activities may cause closer examination by such agencies, which could affect the outcome of the approval process or the timing and expense involved. In addition, our ability
to establish other business relationships may be delayed or adversely affected.

Also, as set forth in the following two risk factors,
Mr. Montano has substantial potential conflicts of interest due to his position as Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and significant stockholder of Phage, our affiliate that manufactures Cardio Vascu-Grow for us.

There can be no assurance that Mr. Montanos past history in the investment banking industry or his potential conflicts of
interest will not have a negative effect on us or on his ability to serve our company.

Our key executives devote less than all of their business time
to us.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Co-President, Daniel C. Montano, along with Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Mickael
A. Flaa, and Chief Scientific Officer and Chief Operating Officer and Vice President,



61



---

##### Table of Contents

John W. Jacobs, devote a sufficient amount of their business time to our company to discharge 100% of their
duties, and also devote time to an affiliated company which does business with us, and the balance of their time on other affairs. We do not have employment agreements with our executive officers or key employees. See following Risk Factor about
potential conflicts of interest.

Our relationship with Phage Biotechnology Corporation, and the relationship of our key executives to Phage, creates
potential for conflicts of interest.

We have a number of relationships with Phage, an affiliated company, which may create conflicts of
interest. Pursuant to a joint ownership and license agreement with Phage, subject to certain contractual commitments, we own a one-half undivided interest in the U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications necessary to develop and commercialize
our new drug candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient. We entered this agreement to protect our ability to obtain patent protection on processes developed in conjunction with Phage, which processes might be useful to
Phage in other unrelated products. Pursuant to that agreement, we also have an exclusive license to develop and commercialize new drug candidates with Cardio Vascu-Grow as the active ingredient. Phage provides technical development services to
us, and currently is our sole supplier of Cardio Vascu-Grow. In addition to Cardio Vascu-Grow, Phage is currently in the process of developing other drug products that are not expected to have any relation to our proposed product or
business. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in our agreements precludes Phage from participating in activities competitive to ours.

Daniel C. Montano beneficially owns approximately 24.75% of our outstanding voting stock. Mr. Montano also owns 18.9% of the outstanding voting stock of Phage. He is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of both
companies. In addition, we own 4.32% of Phages outstanding common stock. Additionally, certain of our officers and former directors (including Daniel C. Montano, Mickael Flaa, Dr. John Jacobs, Alexander G. Montano, Grant Gordon, Joong Ki
Baik and Thomas Ingram) beneficially own or hold voting control over an aggregate of 27% of Phages outstanding common stock. Daniel C. Montano, Grant Gordon and Alexander G. Montano are among certain signatories to a Phage Controlling
Stockholders Agreement that provides for an agreement to vote together.

Mr. Montano devotes as much time as necessary to our affairs,
and devotes time as necessary to Phages affairs and the balance to other investment interests.

John W. (Jack) Jacobs is our Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Scientific Officer and serves in the same positions with Phage. He joined our board of directors upon the closing of our IPO. He devotes as much time as necessary to our affairs, and devotes time as necessary to
Phages affairs and the balance to other investment interests.

Mickael A. Flaa is our Chief Financial Officer and serves the same
role with Phage and CPI. He joined our board of directors upon the closing of our IPO. He devotes as much time as necessary to our affairs, devotes as much time as necessary to CPIs affairs and devotes time as necessary to Phages affairs
and the balance to other investment interests.

Such individuals owe a fiduciary duty of loyalty to us. They also owe similar fiduciary
duties to Phage and CPI. However, due to their responsibilities to serve these companies, there is potential for conflicts of interest. At any particular time, the needs of Phage and/or CPI could cause one or more of these executive officers to
devote such attention at the expense of devoting attention to us. In addition, matters may arise that place the fiduciary duties of these individuals in conflicting positions. Such conflicts will be resolved by our Conflicts Resolution Committee,
comprised of independent directors and directors having no affiliation with Phage or CPI. If this occurs, matters important to us could be delayed. The results of such delays are not susceptible to accurate predictions but could include, among other
things, delay in the production of sufficient amounts of Cardio Vascu-Grow to complete our clinical trials on our preferred timetable or to meet potential commercial demands if our clinical trials are successful and we receive FDA approval to
sell the drug in the U.S. Such delays potentially



62



---

##### Table of Contents

could increase our costs of development or reduce our ability to generate revenue. Our officers will use every effort to
avoid material conflicts of interest generated by their responsibilities to Phage and CPI, but no assurance can be given that material conflicts will not arise that could be detrimental to our operations and financial prospects.

Our Chairman, Co-President and CEO is a guarantor of our obligation under our senior secured notes and warrants.

On March 20, 2006, Daniel C. Montano, our Chairman, Co-President and CEO, entered into a Guaranty Agreement whereby he guaranteed all of our
obligations resulting from the sale on March 20, 2006 of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes and warrants. The guaranty remains in effect until the later of March 20, 2007 or the first date on which we receive revenue from the sale of
drugs in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient after the FDA approves such drugs, provided that on such date we are not in default of any provisions of the obligations or triggering events contained in the agreements for the senior
secured notes and warrants and such default is not continuing. However, the guaranty will terminate upon the payment in full of the notes including conversion of the notes into our common stock.

After our obligations contained in the agreements for the senior secured notes and warrants have been paid in full, if Daniel C. Montano was required to
make any payments pursuant to this guaranty prior to the payment in full of our obligations, we will reimburse Daniel C. Montano for any such payments plus simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of the advance by Daniel C. Montano to the
date reimbursed by us.

Daniel C. Montano owes a fiduciary duty of loyalty to us. However, there is potential for conflicts of interest
between Daniel C. Montanos personal interests and ours whether Daniel C. Montanos guaranty is called upon or not. No assurance can be given that material conflicts will not arise that could be detrimental to our operations and financial
prospects.

We may be subject to claims resulting from our guarantee of Phage leases.

On March 15, 2006, we guaranteed Phages lease obligations for a new manufacturing facility in San Diego, CA, through July 2013. The Lease
provides for Minimum Monthly Rent and Additional Rent for shared costs, which aggregate approximately $20,000 per month. Should Phage default on its lease obligations, we would be called on our guarantee to pay the lease payments.

We have no marketing experience, sales force or distribution capabilities. If our products are approved, and we are unable to recruit key personnel to perform these
functions, we may not be able to commercialize them successfully.

Although we do not currently have any marketable products, our
ability to produce revenues ultimately depends on our ability to sell our products if and when they are approved by the FDA. We currently have no experience in marketing or selling pharmaceutical products and we do not have a marketing and sales
staff or distribution capabilities. If we fail to establish successful marketing and sales capabilities or fail to enter into successful marketing arrangements with third parties, our ability to generate revenues will suffer.

We do not have manufacturing capability. We rely on only one supplier, which is an affiliate, for our bulk drug product. Any problems experienced by such supplier
could negatively affect our operations.

We have entered into an agreement with our affiliated company, Phage, to manufacture our drug
candidates in which Cardio Vascu-Grow is the active ingredient for us and to supply it to us. We are currently exploring a back-up contract manufacturing source for our drug candidates but to date have not concluded any supply contracts. The
agreement with Phage expires August 15, 2021, unless we co-develop additional patents, and then the agreement will expire



63



---

##### Table of Contents

on the date of the last patent to expire. Any significant problem that Phage or one of Phages suppliers experiences
could result in a delay or interruption in the supply of materials to us until that supplier cures the problem or until we locate an alternative supply. Any delay or interruption would likely lead to a delay or interruption in the production of our
drug candidates and could negatively affect our operations. In addition, as part of the drug approval process, The FDA will inspect Phage prior to approval of the drug. If we obtain FDA approval for Cardio Vascu-Grow, Phage will be required to
use a facility that the FDA certifies as in compliance with good manufacturing practices, or GMP, in order to manufacture the drug for use in commercial quantities. Any delay in obtaining such approval could delay our distribution of our our drug
candidates and thus negatively affect our ability to generate revenues.

Governmental and third-party payers may subject any products we develop to
sales and pharmaceutical pricing controls that could limit our product revenues and delay profitability.

The continuing efforts of
government and third-party payers to contain or reduce the costs of health care through various means may reduce our potential revenues. These payers efforts could decrease the price that we receive for any products we may develop and sell in
the future. In addition, third-party insurance coverage may not be available to patients for any products we develop. If government and third-party payers do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement levels for our products, or if price
controls are enacted, our ability to generate revenues will suffer.

If physicians and patients do not accept products for which we obtain marketing
approval, we may not recover our investment.

If the FDA approves our products for marketing, their commercial success will depend upon
the medical community and patients accepting our products as being safe and effective. A number of factors could affect the market acceptance of our products, including:



| |  |  | the timing and receipt of marketing approvals;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the safety and efficacy of the products;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------



| |  |  | the emergence of equivalent or superior products;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the cost-effectiveness of the products; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | effective marketing.
| | - |  | --------------------

Our
profitability will depend on the markets acceptance of our products at profitable prices, which may depend upon the agreement of third party payers to reimburse. If the medical community and patients do not ultimately accept any products
developed by us as being safe and effective, as well as cost effective, we may not recover our investment, and our business may fail.

If we fail to
adequately protect our intellectual property rights, our competitors may be able to take advantage of our research and development efforts to develop competing drugs.

Fibroblast growth factor 1, or FGF-1, and derivatives are powerful stimulators of new blood vessel growth. Our intellectual property rights cover certain methods of manufacturing and using these forms, but do not
cover the primary structure of FGF-1 or derivatives, and there are other ways to manufacture FGF-1 not covered by our patents. Consequently, we may not prevent others from manufacturing FGF-1 by a different technology. Moreover, other uses of FGF-1
are not covered by our existing patents.

Our commercial success will depend in part on our success in obtaining patent protection for our
key products or processes. Our patent position, like that of other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, is highly uncertain. One uncertainty is that the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or PTO, may deny or require significant
narrowing of claims made under our patent applications.



64



---

##### Table of Contents

The unpredictability of the biotechnological sciences, the PTO and patent offices in other jurisdictions
have often required that patent claims reciting biotechnology-related inventions be limited or narrowed substantially to cover only the specific innovations exemplified in the patent application, thereby limiting their scope of protection. Further,
technology that is disclosed in patent applications is ordinarily published before it is patented. As a result, if we are not able to get patent protection, we will not be able to protect that technology through trade secret protection. Thus, if we
fail to obtain patents having sufficient claim scope or fail to adequately protect our trade secrets, we may not be able to exclude competitors from using our products or processes.

Even if the PTO grants patents with commercially valuable claim scope, our ability to exclude competitors will subsequently depend on our successful
assertion of these patents against third party infringers and our successful defense of these patents against possible validity challenges. Our competitors, many of which have substantial resources and have made significant investments in competing
technologies, may make, use or sell our proprietary products or processes despite our intellectual property. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our issued patents or protect our trade secrets. The prosecution of intellectual property lawsuits is
costly and time-consuming, and the outcome of such lawsuits is uncertain. This is particularly true for our patents, since the courts often consider these technologies to involve unpredictable sciences. An adverse determination in litigation could
result in narrowing of our scope of protection or the loss of our intellectual property, thereby allowing competitors to design around or make use of our intellectual property and sell our products in some or all markets. Thus, if any of our patents
are invalidated or narrowed in litigation, we may not be able to exclude our competitors from using our technologies.

Another risk
regarding our ability to exclude competitors is that our issued patents or pending applications could be lost or narrowed if competitors with overlapping technologies provoke an interference proceeding (determination of first to invent)
at the PTO. The defense and prosecution of interference proceedings are costly and time-consuming to pursue, and their outcomes are uncertain. Similarly, a third party may challenge the validity of one or more of our issued patents by presenting
evidence of prior publications to the PTO and requesting reexamination of such patent(s). Thus, even if we are able to obtain patents that cover commercially significant innovations, one or more of our patents may be lost or substantially narrowed
by the PTO through an interference or reexamination proceeding. Consequently, we may not be able to exclude our competitors from using our technologies.

Third party patents, or extensions of third party patents beyond their normal expiration dates, could prevent us from making, using or selling our preferred products and processes, or require us to take license(s), or require us to
defend against claims of patent infringement.

We may have a limited opportunity to operate freely. Our commercial success will depend
in part on our freedom to make, use and sell certain of our preferred drug products and processes. If third party patents have claims that cover any of these products or processes, then we will not be free to operate as described in our business
plan, without invalidating or obtaining license(s) to such patents. We may not be successful in identifying and invalidating prior claims of invention. Similarly, a license may be unavailable or prohibitively expensive. In either case, we may have
to redesign our products or processes. Such redesign efforts may take significant time and money, and such redesign efforts may fail to yield scientifically, clinically or commercially feasible options. If we are unable to develop products or
processes that lie outside the scope of the third partys patent claims, and we continue to operate, then we may face claims of patent infringement, wherein the third party may seek to enjoin us from continuing to operate within our claim scope
and seek monetary compensation for commercial damages resulting from our infringing activity.

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industries have been characterized by extensive patent litigation, and companies have deployed intellectual property litigation to gain a competitive advantage.

The defense of patent infringement suits is costly and time-consuming and outcomes are uncertain. An adverse determination in litigation could subject us to significant liabilities, require us to obtain licenses from



65



---

##### Table of Contents

third parties, or restrict or prevent us from selling our products in certain markets. Although patent and intellectual
property disputes are often settled through licensing or similar arrangements, costs associated with such arrangements may be substantial and could include ongoing royalties. Furthermore, the necessary licenses may not be available to us on
satisfactory terms, if at all. Thus, as discussed above, if third party patents cover any aspect of our products or processes, then we may lack freedom to operate in accordance with our business plan. Among such patents are various patents owned by
third parties that cover the manufacture, sale and use of various forms of FGF-1.

We may be subject to claims that we or our employees have wrongfully
used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of former employers.

As is commonplace in the biotechnology industry, we employ now, and may
hire in the future, individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including competitors or potential competitors. Although there are no claims currently pending against us, we may be subject to claims
that we or certain employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending
against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and would be a significant distraction to management.

If product liability lawsuits
are successfully brought against us, we may incur substantial damages and demand for the potential products may be eliminated or reduced.

The testing and marketing of medical products is subject to an inherent risk of product liability claims. Regardless of their merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:



| |  |  | decreased demand for our products or withdrawal of our products from the market even if previously approved;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | injury to our reputation and significant media attention;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | withdrawal of clinical trial volunteers;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------



| |  |  | costs of litigation; and
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | substantial monetary awards to plaintiffs.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------

We currently maintain product liability insurance specifically issued for the clinical trials in progress with coverage of $2,000,000. This coverage may not be sufficient to fully protect us against product liability claims. We intend to
expand our product liability insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates. Our inability to obtain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost to
protect against product liability claims could prevent or limit the commercialization of our products and expose us to liability in excess of our coverage.

Competition and technological change may make our potential product and technology less attractive or obsolete.

We compete
with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that are pursuing other forms of treatment for the diseases our new drug candidates target. All potential competitors that we know about are working on gene therapies. For example, GenVec, Inc. is
working on a gene therapy drug that has been introduced into the hearts of patients. Boston Scientific Corporation and Corautus Genetics, Inc. are working together to develop a gene therapy to treat coronary artery disease via a catheter. No
efficacy results of either of these projects have been made public, however in March 2006, the FDA placed the clinical trial of Boston Scientific Corporation and Corautus Genetics, Inc. on hold due to reported serious adverse events and Corautus
reported in October 2006 that there was no statistical difference between control and treated patients in this trial. We also may face competition from companies that may develop internally or acquire competing technology from universities and other
research institutions. As these companies develop their technologies, they may develop competitive positions that may prevent or limit our product commercialization efforts.



66



---

##### Table of Contents

Some of our competitors are established companies with greater financial, scientific, marketing and other
resources than us. Other companies may succeed in developing products earlier than we do, obtaining FDA approval for products more rapidly than we do or developing products that are more effective than our product candidates. Research and
development by others may render our technology or product candidates obsolete or noncompetitive or result in treatments or cures superior to any therapy we develop.

Our common stock has a limited trading history, and we expect that the price of our common stock will fluctuate substantially.

Our common stock started trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) on March 10, 2005. Prior to then, there was no public market for shares of our common stock. An active public trading market may not
develop or, if developed, may not be sustained. The market prices for securities of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies historically have been highly volatile, and the market has, from time to time, experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. A number of factors may affect the market price of our common stock including, but not limited to:



| |  |  | regulatory or payer reimbursement developments in the United States or other countries;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | product liability claims or other litigation;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | quarterly variations in our or our competitors results of operations;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in earnings estimates or comments by securities analysts;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | developments in our industry;
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | the result of our clinical trials;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | developments in patent or other proprietary rights;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | general market conditions;
| | - |  | --------------------------



| |  |  | future sales of common stock by existing stockholders; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | public concern as to the safety of our drugs.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------

If any of the risks described in this Risk Factors section occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall dramatically and may expose us to class action securities lawsuits, which, even if unsuccessful, would be
costly to defend and a distraction to management.

Conversion into common stock of the senior secured notes and warrants that we recently sold could
cause substantial dilution.

We completed the Private Placement of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes together with warrants to
purchase 705,882 shares of the Companys common stock on March 20, 2006. The notes are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at any time at $12 per share (the Fixed Conversion Price. In addition, the notes
are convertible after five months from the closing date at 94% of the average of the preceding five days weighted average trading price, if the result is lower than $12 per share. Conversion of the senior secured notes into the Companys common
stock at other than the Fixed Conversion Price is limited to no more than 10% of the original $20,000,000 note balance per calendar month. The notes mature in March 2009. In connection with the notes, we also issued warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 705,882 shares of our common stock. The term of the warrants is three years. The warrants may be exercised anytime up to March 2009. The warrant exercise price is $8.50 per share. Our stock price is subject to severe volatility. Accordingly, the
conversion of the senior secured notes and the exercise of the warrants could result in substantial dilution to the existing shareholders.

During the third quarter of 2006, Note holders converted $295,723 of the convertible senior secured noted to 110,500 shares of the Companys common stock for an average share price of $2.76 (including 28,000 committed shares). During
the period ended September 30, 2006 $7,576 of interest on senior secured convertible notes were paid with common stock.



67



---

##### Table of Contents

A sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could harm the market price of our common stock.
Approximately 100,940,265 shares of our common stock are available for resale under Rule 144, which includes shares that became eligible for sale as a result of the expiration of lock-up arrangements between certain of our stockholders and
underwriters, the last lock-up of which expired on August 11, 2006. As additional shares of our common stock become available for resale in the public market, the supply of our common stock will increase, which could decrease the price.

Our principal stockholders have significant voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.

Our officers, directors and principal stockholders together control approximately 74.1% of our outstanding common stock. These
stockholders have signed an agreement to act together, and will be able to control our management and affairs in all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This
concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might adversely affect the market price of our common stock. This concentration of ownership may not be in the best interest of our other stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions in Delaware law could discourage a takeover and may prevent or frustrate any attempt by stockholders to change the direction
or our management.

The provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporate Law govern our company, which may prohibit
certain business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These provisions of the Delaware law could make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our company and could
delay or impede a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest involving our company. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Such provisions also make it difficult for
stockholders to change the direction or management of the Company.

We have broad discretion in how we use the net proceeds from our initial public
offering and our more recent sale of senior secured debt, and we may not use these proceeds effectively.

Our management has broad
discretion as to the application of the net proceeds of our IPO and our more recent sale of senior secured debt. Our stockholders may not agree with the manner in which our management chooses to allocate and spend the net proceeds. Moreover, our
management may use the net proceeds for corporate purposes that may not increase our profitability or our market value.

In selling our convertible
notes, we may have violated the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) which, if it occurred, would give note holders a right to rescind their purchases.

Commencing in 2001 and ending in August 2004, we sold three series of convertible notes, each bearing interest at a rate of 7%. The proceeds raised from
the sale of all series of these notes have been used for operating costs and clinical trials. The notes were sold to investors who, with few exceptions, were not residents or citizens of the United States. We made these sales in reliance on the fact
that either the sales occurred outside the United States and were thus not subject to the jurisdiction of the Securities Act or were made to accredited investors pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by the Securities Act. Our counsel
has advised us that the availability of those exemptions cannot be determined with legal certainty because we did not comply with all of the provisions of exemption safe-harbors for such sales offered by rules promulgated under the Securities Act by
the SEC. Thus, it is possible that the sale of some of the series of convertible notes may have violated the registration requirements of the Securities Act. As to most of those sales, a right of



68



---

##### Table of Contents

rescission may exist on which the statute of limitations has not run. For those note holders that elected to convert to
common stock and who have not sold that stock, we may have a contingent liability arising from the original purchase of the convertible notes that such note holders converted. If the sales to noteholders that have converted to common stock had to be
rescinded, our total potential liability could be $14,892,200 plus interest. That liability would extend for up to six years after the date of the sale of the applicable convertible note that was converted to common stock. The notes were converted
at either $2.00 per share or $4.00 per share. Accordingly, the market price of our common stock would likely have to decrease below its current level before a former noteholder had a significant economic reason to pursue any potential rescission
rights.

We incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, as well as new rules the SEC subsequently implemented, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect these new rules and regulations to continue to increase our legal and financial compliance
costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a public company, we have added independent directors, created additional board committees and adopted policies regarding internal controls and
disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, we are incurring additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. We also expect these new rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to
continue to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us
to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Our securities are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, which will limit the liquidity and price of our securities more than if our securities were quoted or listed on a
national exchange.

Our common stock is quoted for trading on the OTC BB. Our ability to have a liquid trading market develop for our
common stock will be diminished if our common stock is not approved for quotation on a national exchange.

If our common stock becomes subject to the
SECs penny stock rules, our stockholders may find it difficult to sell their stock.

When the trading price of our common stock is
below $5.00 per share, our common stock becomes subject to the SECs penny stock rules. Before a broker-dealer can sell a penny stock, the penny stock rules require the firm to first approve the customer for the transaction and receive from the
customer a written agreement to the transaction. The firm must furnish the customer a document describing the risks of investing in penny stocks. The broker-dealer must tell the customer the current market quotation, if any, for the penny stock and
the compensation the firm and its broker will receive for the trade. Finally, the firm must send monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customers account. These disclosure requirements tend to make
it more difficult for a broker-dealer to make a market in penny stocks, and could, therefore, reduce the level of trading activity in a stock that is subject to the penny stock rules. Consequently, if our common stock becomes subject to the penny
stock rules, our stockholders may find it difficult to sell their shares.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Use of Proceeds from the Private Placement

On March 20, 2006, we completed the private placement of $20,000,000 of senior secured notes with warrants to purchase 705,882 shares
of our common stock (the Private Placement).



69



---

##### Table of Contents

Net proceeds received by the Company in connection with the Private Placement are being held in an
interest bearing money market account. The Company plans to use the net proceeds at such time as needed when the IPO proceeds have been exhausted for funding pre-clinical and clinical trials and for general and administrative activities.

Use of Proceeds from IPO

The Company has expended
approximately $15,693,125 of the IPO proceeds of which approximately $5,460,548 was expended for funding preclinical and clinical trials and $10,141,018 for general and administrative activities. The Company has also expended approximately $91,559
for interest on the Senior Secured Promethean notes out of the IPO proceeds.

Use of Proceeds from Private Placement

The Company has expended approximately $5,732,924 of the proceeds from the Senior Promethean notes of which approximately $1,796,976 was expended for
funding preclinical trials and $3,337,242 for general and administrative activities. The Company has also expended approximately $598,706 for interest on the Senior Secured Promethean notes.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:



|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                      
|------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                              
|10.1          |  | Lease agreement dated August 7, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the form 8-k filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2006).               
|              | 
|10.2          |  | Second amendment dated August 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-k filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2006).           
|              | 
|10.3          |  | First amendment dated September 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-k filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 14, 2006).         
|              | 
|31.1          |  | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|              | 
|31.2          |  | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|              | 
|32            |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.       



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



|              |  |                                      |  |                                                      
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|              |  | CARDIOVASCULAR BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
|              |  |                                     
|June 26, 2007 |  | By:                                  |  | /s/ Mickael A. Flaa                                  
|              |  |                                      |  | Mickael A. Flaa                                      
|              |  |                                      |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer