alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**Section 302 Certification**I, Wayne L. Laufer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this September 30, 2005 Form 10-Q of Bois d’Arc Energy, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005                                                       /s/ WAYNE L. LAUFER   Chief Executive Officer     
28
Shon Glynn MILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3963

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1170

SRAM CORPORATION (now known as SRAM, LLC),

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

AD-II ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in

consolidated case nos. 00-CV-6675 and 01-CV-62, Judge Robert W. Gettleman.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of SRAM Corporation's unopposed motion to reform the

caption to indicate that it has merged into SRAM, LLC,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted and the revised official caption is reflected above.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk	

FILED

N.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

HE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Richard B. Walsh, Jr., Esq.

Michael T. Brady, Esq.	

2009

Date

s8
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-160743) pertaining to the Walter Investment Management Corp. 1999Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended) and the Walter Investment Management Corp. 2009 Long-Term Incentive Award Plan of Walter Investment Management Corp., and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-192033) pertaining to the Walter InvestmentManagement Corp. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-179013) of Walter Investment Management Corp. and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated February 27, 2014, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Walter Investment Management Corp. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Walter Investment Management Corp. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2013. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Tampa, Florida 

August 14, 2014
Leon COLTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2944

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX HI BIT 32.1
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I,
William Hopke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of
Espre Solutions, Inc., and Subsidiaries on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Espre Solutions, Inc. and
Subsidiaries.
   Dated:
      November 21, 2008
                By:  /s/ William
      HopkeWilliam
      Hopke, Chief Executive
Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

O- 11

..

.. 12

~ :¡

C\ c(

13

S ~ ~ c( . ""

Q) CJ 14

;. )-

c: ~i: 15

~ 0

C\ lS ~

16

..

Q) 17 r:

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

430120.1 1090.23834

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

MICHELLE R. PRESS (SBN 163637)

LAURA R. RAMOS (SBN 186326)

RYAN VAN STEENIS lSBN 254542)

11766 Wilshire Blvd., 6t Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025-6538

Telephone: (3 LO) 445-0800

Facsimile: (310) 473-2525

Attorneys for PlaintiffUnionamerica Insurance Company

Limited (erroneously referred to as St. Paul Reinsurance

Company Limited)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Unionamerica Insurance Company Limited,

successor-in-interest to St. Paul Reinsurance

Company Limited,

CASE NO. C 05 01912 BZ

STIPULATION REGARDING AMOUNT OF

PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AWARD

(PROPOSED) ORDER

Plaintiff,

v.

The Fort Miler Group, Inc., The Fort Miler

Company, Inc. and Beeche Systems

Corporation, Trial date: February 23, 2009

Defendants.

COMES NOW, plaintiffUnionamerica Insurance Company Limited ("Unionamerica") and

defendants, The Fort Miller Group, Inc., The Fort Miler Company, and Beeche Systems

Corporation ("defendants"), through their respective attorneys of record, and hereby stipulate to

the below.

Pursuant to the Cour's April 27, 2009, Order granting Unionamerica's Motion to Amend

the Judgment To Include Prejudgment Interest wherein the Court Ordered the paries to stipulate

as to the amount of prejudgment interest to be added to the judgment,

/ II

1

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING

AMOUNT OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST A WARD

C 0501912 BZ

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 390 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 2
2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

~ 11

..

.. 12 ~3:

C\ c:

13

S ~ ~c: .-

Q) CJ 14

;. )-

CO ~i: 15

~ 0

C\ I16

-S ~

Q) 17 C/

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

430120.1 1090.23834

respecti ve attorneys of record that:

IT is HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in this action through their

in this matter.

1. Prejudgment interest in the amolUit of$238,572.37 shall be added to the Judgment

DATED: Mayl$,2009

DATED: MayÊ 2009

SO ORDERED:

Dated:

SELMAN BREITMAN LLP

By: M ER.P

URA R. RAMOS

RYAN V AN STEENIS

Attorneys for PlaintiffUnionamerica Insurance

Company Limited, successor-in-interest to S1. Paul

Reinsurance Company Limited

SQUIR SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLP

By: ~LLEN H. MILLER

DAVID GABIANELLI

DANIEL BALMA T

Attorneys for Defendants The Fort Miller Group, Inc.,

The Foi1 Miller Company, Inc. and Beeche Systems

Corporation

BERNARD ZIMMERMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING

AMOUNT OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST A WARD

C 0501912 BZ

May 18, 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 390 Filed 05/18/09 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 3 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 4 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 5 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 6 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 7 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 8 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 9 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 10 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 11 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 12 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 13 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 14 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 15 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 16 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 17 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 18 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 19 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 20 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 21 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 22 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 23 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 24 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 25 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 26 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 27 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 28 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 29 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 30 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 31 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 32 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 33 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 34 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 35 of 36

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-6   Filed 12/14/17   Page 36 of 36
Willie Kevin WILLIAMS v. STATE

CR-16-0484

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.17

                [LETTERHEAD OF LOCATEPLUS HOLDINGS CORPORATION]


August  5,  2003

Douglas  H.  Leighton
A  Managing  Member
Dutchess  Private  Equities  Fund,  L.P.
312  Stuart  St.
Boston,  MA  02116

Dear  Mr.  Leighton:

For  good  and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged, you
agree  (i)  to  terminate  the Investment Agreement, dated June 2, 2003, and the
Registration  Agreement,  dated  June  2,  2003 (collectively, the "Agreements")
between  LocatePLUS  Holdings  Corporation  ("LocatePLUS")  and Dutchess Private
Equities  Fund,  L.P. ("Dutchess"); and (ii) to release and discharge LocatePLUS
from  any  and  all  obligations  to  Dutchess or any of its agents arising from
either  of  the  Agreements.


Agreed  and  Accepted


 /S/ Douglas  H.  Leighton
---------------------------
By     Douglas  H.  Leighton
     A  Managing  Member




Regards,

 /S/ James C. Fields
---------------------------
James  C.  Fields
VP  of  Finance  and  Acting CFO
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8


                    FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is entered
into among ENCOMPASS MANAGEMENT CO., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
ENCOMPASS SERVICES CORPORATION, a Texas corporation ("Encompass"), and JOSEPH M.
IVEY ("Employee").

     The Company, Encompass and Employee have previously entered into an
Employment Agreement dated effective as of March 28, 2000 (the "Employment
Agreement"). The Employee has requested, and the Compensation Committee of
Encompass has approved, amendments to the severance provisions of the Employment
Agreement.

     For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is acknowledged, the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:

     1.  Termination. Clause (B) of Subparagraph (c)(i) of Section 9 is amended
         -----------
in its entirety to read as follows:

              "(B) the amount of Employee's target bonus established by the
         Compensation Committee of Encompass at the beginning of the calendar
         year in which such termination occurs, which shall not be less than
         120% of the Annual Base Salary for such year,"

     2.  Ratification and Affirmation. The Employment Agreement, as amended
         -----------------------------
hereby, is ratified and affirmed, and shall continue in full force and effect as
set forth therein and amended hereby.

<PAGE>


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have executed this Agreement
effective as of March 1, 2001.

                                      COMPANY:


                                      ENCOMPASS MANAGEMENT CO.


                                      By: /s/ GARY H. MUZZY
                                         --------------------------
                                         Gray H. Muzzy
                                         Senior Vice President

                                      EMPLOYEE:


                                      By: /s/ JOSEPH M. IVEY
                                         --------------------------
                                         Joseph M. Ivey


   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Encompass Services Corporation has executed this
Agreement effective as of the date set forth above in order to evidence its
approval thereof.

                                      ENCOMPASS SERVICES CORPORATION


                                      By: /s/ GARY H. MUZZY
                                         --------------------------
                                         Gray H. Muzzy
                                         Senior Vice President
EX PARTE Travis D. SIMPSON

CR-17-0162

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Mozine JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-1402

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 2019

Denied. Applicant has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Johnson v. State, 15-0346 (La. 11/20/15), 179 So.3d 590.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO.,

LIMITED, Successor-ininterest to ST. PAUL

REINSURANCE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.,

THE FORT MILLER CO. and

BEECHE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C05-1912 BZ

BRIEFING ORDER

 

Having received Unionamerica’s motion to amend the

judgment and motion for attorney’s fees, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

AS FOLLOWS:

1. Defendants’ opposition to the respective motions

shall be filed by April 15, 2009;

2. Plaintiff’s reply, if any, shall be filed by April

22, 2009;

3. If a hearing is required, it is scheduled for 

May 20, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom G, 15th Floor,

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 372 Filed 04/01/09 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,

California 94102.

Dated: April 1, 2009

 

 Bernard Zimmerman

 United States Magistrate Judge

g:\bzall\-bzcases\Unionamerica v. Fort Miller\Briefing Order On Post Judgment Motions

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 372 Filed 04/01/09 Page 2 of 2
Christopher HALL, Appellant, v. BREVARD PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

Charles A. Schilinger and Joel A. Goldfarb, of Schilinger & Coleman, PA, Melbourne, for Appellant.

Joseph K. Naberhaus and Claudia Haines Jones, of Dean, Mead, Viera, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     The undersigned executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.           /s/ William J. Ryan           Name: William J. Ryan    Title: Chief Executive Officer  Date: August 4, 2006Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 has been provided to TD Banknorth Inc. and will be retained by TD Banknorth Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
61
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantair, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Steven Santo, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
February 11, 2011





/s/
      Steven SantoName:
                Steven
      SantoTitle:
                Chief
      Executive Officer
Case 3:05-cv-01707-L Document 11 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 53
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Form 10-Q  Quarterly  Report of SLM Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                           SLM HOLDINGS, INC.

May 20, 2008          By:  /s/ Jason Bishara
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Jason Bishara
                           Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                           Officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1247 

KAH 10-01119 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. 

DEXTER MURRAY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL 

SERVICES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

WILLIAM D. BRODERICK, JR., ELMA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark

H. Dadd, A.J.), entered February 24, 2010 in a habeas corpus

proceeding. The judgment denied the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
# C_2017221EN.01000601.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 11 April 2017 — Ntp. Nagyszénás Településszolgáltatási Nonprofit Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

(Case C-182/17)

(2017/C 221/08)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Ntp. Nagyszénás Településszolgáltatási Nonprofit Kft.

Appellant:

Respondent: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the concept of ‘bod[y] governed by public law’ in the first subparagraph of Article 13(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax include a commercial company which is 100 % owned by a municipality? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the concept of ‘bod[y] governed by public law’ in the first subparagraph of Article 13(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax include a commercial company which is 100 % owned by a municipality?

1

| 2. | If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, may it be considered that the commercial company acts as a public authority when performing tasks that are the responsibility of the municipality but that the latter delegates to that company? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative, may it be considered that the commercial company acts as a public authority when performing tasks that are the responsibility of the municipality but that the latter delegates to that company?

| 3. | If the answer to either of the previous questions is in the negative, may it be considered that the amount paid by the municipality to the commercial company for performing the tasks constitutes consideration? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the answer to either of the previous questions is in the negative, may it be considered that the amount paid by the municipality to the commercial company for performing the tasks constitutes consideration?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---