alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

The undersigned Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee Holdings Inc.
(the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

Dated:
August 15, 2005

|/s/PETER C. BROWNPeter C. Brown
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/CRAIG R. RAMSEYCraig R. Ramsey
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer       |  | 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Marquee Holdings Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel C. Montano, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |  |  |        |  |                                      
| |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    DANIEL C. MONTANO             
| |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Daniel C. Montano                    
| |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 4, 2006

I, Mickael A. Flaa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 4, 2006 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    MICKAEL A. FLAA 
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Mickael A. Flaa        
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

Signed originals of these written statements required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
have been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

These certifications accompany the Form 10-Q to which they relate, are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO.,LIMITED, Successor-in-interest to ST. PAULREINSURANCE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE FORT MILLER GROUP, INC.,THE FORT MILLER CO. andBEECHE SYSTEMS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

)))))))))))))))

No. C05-1912 BZ

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’SSECOND REQUEST TO AMENDJUDGMENT

    IT IS ORDERED that Unionamerica’s second request to 

amend the judgment (Doc. No. 401) is DENIED. The judgment

states that Unionamerica shall recover its costs as permitted

by law.  The costs in this case have been taxed, and, no

objections having been filed thereto, they are recoverable. 

The Court sees no reason why, at this late date, the judgment

should be amended.  

Dated: July 8, 2009

                                      Bernard Zimmerman

                              United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ   Document 406   Filed 07/08/09   Page 1 of 1
McN

A

M

A

R

A, N

E

Y, B

E

A

T

T

Y, SL

A

T

T

E

R

Y, B

O

R

G

ES &

A

M

B

A

C

H

E

R

L

LP

ATT OR N EY S A T LA

W

3 4 8 0 B US K IRK

A

V E N

U E, SU ITE 2 5 0 , PLEA S A

N T H ILL, C A 9 4 5 2 3

TELEPH

O

N E: ( 9 2 5 ) 9 3 9 - 5 3 3 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, C17-228 JCS 

NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167)

noah.blechman@mcnamaralaw.com 

AMY S. ROTHMAN (State Bar No. 308133) 

amy.rothman@mcnamaralaw.com 

MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,

BORGES & AMBACHER LLP 

3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 250 

Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 

Telephone: (925) 939-5330 

Facsimile: (925) 939-0203 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF PITTSBURG, and OFFICER MICHAEL KEEFE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WORSTEN ANDREWS,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CITY OF PITTSBURG, a municipal 

corporation; OFFICER MICHAEL KEEFE, 

individually and in his Official Capacity as 

a Police Officer for the CITY OF 

PITTSBURG; DOES 1-50, inclusive; 

individually and in their official capacities 

and POLICE OFFICERS for the CITY OF 

PITTSBURG, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C17-228 JCS

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

The parties to the above entitled action hereby provide the Court with the following 

Notice of Settlement: 

The parties have settled the case and have now executed a Settlement Agreement and 

Release in this action. A settlement draft has been ordered and once delivered to Plaintiff’s 

counsel, a dismissal of this action will be filed with the Court, which the parties believe will be on 

file in the next 30-45 days. The parties wanted to notify the Court of this settlement due to the 

fact that there are Pretrial filing deadlines coming up on August 21, 2019, with a Pretrial 

Conference scheduled for September 20, 2019, and a trial in this matter scheduled for October 7, 

Case 3:17-cv-00228-JCS Document 75 Filed 08/13/19 Page 1 of 2
McN

A

M

A

R

A, N

E

Y, B

E

A

T

T

Y, SL

A

T

T

E

R

Y, B

O

R

G

ES &

A

M

B

A

C

H

E

R

L

LP

ATT OR N EY S A T LA

W

3 4 8 0 B US K IRK

A

V E N

U E, SU ITE 2 5 0 , PLEA S A

N T H ILL, C A 9 4 5 2 3

TELEPH

O

N E: ( 9 2 5 ) 9 3 9 - 5 3 3 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT, C17-228 JCS 2

2019. 

The parties attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from 

each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. 

Dated: August 13, 2019 Law Offices of Brittany Hendrix-Smith 

By: /s/ Smith, Brittany H. 

Brittany H. Smith 

Attorney for Plaintiff, WORSTEN ANDREWS 

Dated: August 13, 2019 MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,

BORGES & AMBACHER LLP

By: /s/ Rothman, Amy S. 

Noah G. Blechman 

Amy S. Rothman 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY OF PITTSBURG, and OFFICER MICHAEL 

KEEFE 

Case 3:17-cv-00228-JCS Document 75 Filed 08/13/19 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS   Document 146   Filed 05/30/17   Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 5, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 9044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02260]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-453 and 731-TA-1136-1137 (Third Review)]

Sodium Nitrite From China and Germany

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty 
orders on sodium nitrite from China and the antidumping duty order on 
sodium nitrite from Germany would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Rhonda K. Schmidtlein not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on July 1, 2024 (89 FR 
54536) and determined on October 4, 2024 that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (89 FR 85986, October 29, 2024).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on January 31, 2025. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5582 (January 2025), 
entitled Sodium Nitrite from China and Germany: Investigation Nos. 701-
TA-453 and 731-TA-1136-1137 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 31, 2025.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025-02260 Filed 2-4-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
Victor RAMOS-OCASIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3051

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[February 28, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
MEDIA MODELING:

JOURNALISM DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

MD SHUEY, 2019
PROJECT INCEPTION

 Former internship project

 E-mail newsletter summarizing relevant 

news across 7 major English-language 

sources

 Originally Excel analysis, later 

reconstructed via R

Manual Collection

(daily)

Manual Classification

Few, Select Sources
HOW TO RECREATE? HOW TO EXPAND?

 Automatic headline pulling

 Manual classification

 Sentiment analysis

Manual Collection

(daily)

Manual Classification

Select Sources

Automatic API Collection

ML Classification text 

analysis

Any/All Sources!
NEWSAPI
NEWSAPI R WRAPPER

 Github.com/MDshuey/NewsAPI

 Credit to mkearney for 1.0

 Possible future pull request for 2.0 updates

 Using R parameters, creates the HTML API call, and converts 

from JSON to data frame format

 daily_recaps loop function allows for more efficient pulling 

(from the last 31 days)

 Variables:

 Source, author, title, URL, image URL, time published, content (first 

sentences of article)
USE CASES

 Customized news alerts

 Time series event detection

 Determine news cycle 

beginning, peak, end

 From this, predict article 

popularity

 Sentiment analysis of text 

from difference sources

 Compare popularity to 

positivity/negativity index

 sentiment dictionary 

matrix (lexicon)
CONCLUSION

GitHub.com/Mdshuey/Portfolio

LinkedIn: Mitchell D. Shuey Open to career opportunities!
# m8585.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.10.2017 C(2017) 6862 final PUBLIC VERSION The notifying party: Subject : Case M. 8585 – Axis / Novae Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 13 September 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Axis Capital Hold ings Limited (Bermuda) (‘Axis’) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Novae Group PLC (United Kingdom) (‘Novae’) by way of public bid . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Axis: a Bermuda headquartered global (re)insurance company listed on the New York Stock Exchange providing a broad range of specialty lines insurance and treaty reinsurance, - for Novae: a United Kingdom publically listed company headquartered in London and listed on the London Stock Exchange; through its syndicate at Lloyd’s (Syndicate 2007), it underwrites both insurance and reinsuranc e. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 31 2 , 20.09.2017 , p. 06 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
A.J.S. v. STATE

CR-16-1124

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied February 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 368 

Designating September 25, 2021, through October 3, 2021, as ‘‘Blue Star 

Welcome Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 

Mr. KAINE (for himself and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 25, 2021, through October 3, 2021, 

as ‘‘Blue Star Welcome Week’’. 

Whereas Blue Star Families seeks to empower military families by connecting them with their neighbors, both individuals and organizations, to create vibrant communities 

of mutual support; 

Whereas Blue Star Families annually designates the week beginning the last Saturday in September and concluding 

9 days thereafter as ‘‘Blue Star Welcome Week’’; 

Whereas, during Blue Star Welcome Week, the Senate recognizes the 600,000 active duty and transitioning military 

families who move to new communities each year; 

Whereas nearly half of these permanent change of station 

(PCS) moves occur during the summer; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 368 IS 

Whereas only 27 percent of military family respondents to 

the 2020 Military Family Lifestyle Survey published by 

Blue Star Families reported that they feel a sense of belonging to their local civilian community; and 

Whereas a sense of belonging is essential to the well-being 

and readiness of military families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 25, 2021, through 

3 October 3, 2021, as ‘‘Blue Star Welcome Week’’; 

4 (2) expresses gratitude for the sacrifices made 

5 by service members, transitioning veterans, and their 

6 families; 

7 (3) commits to ensuring that military-connected 

8 families feel a strong sense of belonging to their 

9 local civilian communities; and 

10 (4) encourages civilians across the United 

11 States to welcome military-connected families into 

12 their communities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Jenelle WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-793

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-01779-M Document 4 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 11
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-453 and 731-TA-1136-1137 (Third Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on sodium nitrite from China and the antidumping duty order on sodium nitrite from Germany would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.[2] 

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on July 1, 2024 (89 FR 54536) and determined on October 4, 2024 that it would conduct expedited reviews (89 FR 85986, October 29, 2024).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on January 31, 2025. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5582 (January 2025), entitled                     *Sodium Nitrite from China and Germany: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-453 and 731-TA-1136-1137 (Third Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 31, 2025.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Rhonda K. Schmidtlein not participating.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2025-02260 Filed 2-4-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Investors‘ Request according to Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS

Wendy He to: Gina_Agustine 05/24/2017 11:02 PM

Cc: rscrd

Date: 05/24/2017

United States District Court 

Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

To the Honorable Judge Seaborg:

We,Cao Yabing, Chu Min, He Wenhong, Li Jun , Tian Shuang 

and Wu Tao, are investors in NA3PL, LLC of San Francisco 

Regional Center.

We are writing because we want the court to know that we know 

Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 136 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 2
our investment is profitable under the current management. We 

are concerned that the Monitor Susan L. Uecker may not have 

the expertise to run our investment. We, Cao Yabing, Chu Min, 

He Wenhong, Li Jun , Tian Shuang and Wu Tao oppose 

NA3PL, LLC to be put into receivership because it would create 

additional risk for their investment and for their non-pecuniary 

interests.

Thank you,

Cao Yabing, Chu Min, He Wenhong, Li Jun , Tian Shuang and 

Wu Tao

Case 3:17-cv-00223-RS Document 136 Filed 05/25/17 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-14   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 4

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-14   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 4

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-14   Filed 12/14/17   Page 3 of 4

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-14   Filed 12/14/17   Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACQUELINE ZHANG, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

COUNTY OF MONTEREY; MONTEREY 

COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 

AGENCY; MONTEREY COUNTY 

PARKS DEPARTMENT, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-15955 

D.C. No. 5:17-cv-00007-LHK 

Northern District of California, 

San Jose 

ORDER

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and W. FLETCHER and MILLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Jacqueline Zhang’s Request for Attorney’s Fees on Appeal, filed March 9, 

2020, is DENIED.

FILED

MAR 30 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case: 18-15955, 03/30/2020, ID: 11645007, DktEntry: 47, Page 1 of 1
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BLACKBERRY’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART BLACKBERRY’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1098

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on third party Blackberry’s 

motion to seal as follows: 

Document Page/Line Ruling

Grubbs Deposition 224:4-7 GRANTED. 

Grubbs Deposition 233:18-234:2 GRANTED. 

Grubbs Deposition 236:1-7 GRANTED. 

Grubbs Deposition 236:15-19 GRANTED. 

Grubbs Deposition 244:6-13 GRANTED. 

Grubbs Deposition 244:16-20 GRANTED. 

Grubbs Deposition 245:11-17 DENIED. 

Grubbs Deposition 247:4-248:4 GRANTED. 

Grubbs Deposition 249:14-18, 20 GRANTED. 

Grubbs Deposition 255:11-15 GRANTED. 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1101 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BLACKBERRY’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Grubbs Deposition 256:24-257:2 DENIED.

Grubbs Deposition 257:20-22 GRANTED.

Grubbs Deposition 257:25-258:6 GRANTED.

Grubbs Deposition 258:9-15 DENIED.

Grubbs Deposition 259:1-9 GRANTED.

Grubbs Deposition 259:10 DENIED.

Grubbs Deposition 259:13-25 GRANTED.

Grubbs Deposition 288:10 DENIED.

Grubbs Deposition 288:12-13 GRANTED.

Grubbs Deposition 288:15-17 GRANTED.

CX3255 Selected Portions GRANTED.

CX3264 Selected Portions GRANTED.

CX3283 Selected Portions GRANTED.

JX0062 Selected Portions GRANTED.

JX0094 Selected Portions GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 3, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1101 Filed 01/03/19 Page 2 of 2
Marcus Darnell EBRON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4544

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 28, 2019

Marcus Darnell Ebron, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DENIED .

Makar, Osterhaus, and Jay, JJ., concur.