alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---



Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of Dynamic Gold Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, each of Tim Coupland, the Chief Executive Officer, and Gord Steblin, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/ s / Tim Coupland                       
|Tim Coupland, Principal Executive Officer

November 9, 2009



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/ s / Gord Steblin                       
|Gord Steblin, Principal Financial Officer

November 9, 2009



---
# L_2017262EN.01000601.xml

| 12.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 262/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 262/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2017/1844

of 9 October 2017

appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Government of the Netherlands,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Rogier VAN DER SANDE, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Rogier VAN DER SANDE,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Ms J. (Jeannette) BALJEU, Gedeputeerde in de provincie Zuid-Holland. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms J. (Jeannette) BALJEU, Gedeputeerde in de provincie Zuid-Holland.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 9 October 2017.

For the Council

The President

S. KIISLER

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

United Launch Services, LLC 

Under Contract No. F04701-98-D-0002 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61729 

Carl J. Nichols, Esq. 

Charles C. Speth, Esq. 

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale 

and Dorr LLP 

Washington, DC 

Matthew J. Thome, Esq. 

Von Briesen & Roper, S.C. 

Milwaukee, WI 

Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Christopher M. Judge, Esq. 

Caryl A. Potter, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WOODROW 

Previously, on June 29, 2016, the Board issued an entitlement decision 

sustaining ASBCA Nos. 56850 and 57542 and dismissing as moot ASBCA No. 57661. 

The Board remanded the matters to the parties for negotiation of quantum. By letter 

dated July 31, 2018, appellant stated that it wished the Board to proceed with quantum. 

The Board assigned ASBCA No. 61729 to the quantum phase of these matters. 

The parties have now resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter 

judgment in favor of appellant. It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 

§§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' settlement agreement and joint motion for entry 

of consent judgment, that this appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent judgment, 
the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $240,000,000.00. 

This amount is inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be paid. 

Dated: November 8, 2018 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

0~ 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61729, Appeal of United 

Launch Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION BY THOMAS F. MARANO


PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a),


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas F. Marano, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Ditech Holding Corporation; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





/s/ Thomas F. MaranoThomas F. MaranoChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: May 13, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9
<INVENTORY>                                        327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   128
<PP&E>                                             635
<DEPRECIATION>                                     947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              916
<BONDS>                                            465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                          82
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,002
<SALES>                                          3,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,324
<CGS>                                            2,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    186
<INCOME-TAX>                                        77
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date: March 13, 2009
    /s/Paul F. BolingPaul F. BolingChief Financial Officer
Polishing Your Analysis Tools 

Until They Are Shiny

Andrew Dau

United States Department of Agriculture –

National Agricultural Statistics Service
2

The findings and conclusions in this 

preliminary presentation have not been 

formally disseminated by the U. S. 

Department of Agriculture and should not 

be construed to represent any agency 

determination or policy.
National Agricultural Statistics 

Service (NASS)

• NASS is committed to providing timely, 

accurate, and useful statistics in service to U.S. 

agriculture. 

• Over 400 reports annually.

– Census of Agriculture every 5 years.

• Majority of reports driven by surveys

3
Traditional NASS Survey Process

4

Data 

Collection

Editing of Data

Summarization

Estimation 

Process

Analysis of Data

Interactive Data 

Analysis System

(IDAS)
What is IDAS?

• Analysis tool built using SAS/AF

• First tool deployed in 1994

– Used by analysts in headquarters and our twelve regional 

offices – guided analysis

– Written and maintained by statisticians in Methodology 

Division

• Moti┗ation to Ihange...

– SAS no longer releasing any AF updates or enhancements

– Architecture updates

– Enhance our analysis capabilities

5
What is R Shiny?

• Shiny helps you make interactive web 

applications for visualizing data. Bring R data 

analysis to life.

• Shiny combines the computational power of R 

with the interactivity of the modern web.

rstudio.com
R Shiny

7
R Shiny App Basics

server.R

•Defines 

functionality 

of app

ui.R

•Defines app 

layout
Why R Shiny?

• Shiny User Showcase looks promising

• Some familiarity with R

– More familiarity coming?

(2018, Pierson - ASA Survey of Recent Graduates)

9

Use Java JMP Python R SAS Tableau

Rarely 122 128 90 74 101 103

Monthly 6 4 21 22 12 8

Weekly 2 4 10 14 9 9

Daily 6 0 27 29 16 14
Where should you start? 

Proof of Concept

• Assess the viability of a software product 

solving a business need

– Does it have functionality to replace old 

application?

– Is it secure?

– Is it scalable?

– etc.

10
Proof of Concept Part 1

Scatter Plots

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Useful Packages

• ggplot2

• plotly

• shinydashboard

• shinydashboardPlus

• data.table

• esquiesse

• leaflet

29
Conclusion

• R shiny has sho┘n neIessaヴy IapaHility...so faヴ.

– Need further development

– Need to test deployment strategy

– Need to stress test

– etc.

• Lots of ケuestions to He ans┘eヴed...

30
Contact Info

Andrew Dau

andrew.dau@nass.usda.gov

31
Selected References 

www.google.com

www.rstudio.com

https://divadnojnarg.github.io/blog/awesomedashboards/

https://cran.r-project.org

https://github.com/dreamRs/esquisse

Pierson, Steve. ASA Director of Science Policy. (2018). Suvey of 2016-2017 Graduates 

Yields Insights for Current, Prospective Students. AMSTAT NEWS. October 2018. Issue 

496.

Tufte, E. R. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, 

Connecticut: Graphics Press.

32
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 24.6

Power of Attorney of Gerald Tellefsen



STATE OF GEORGIA

COUNTY OF FULTON


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Gerald Tellefsen, Director of EDUTREK
INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Georgia corporation, do constitute and appoint Steve
Bostic and Daniel D. Moore, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-
in-fact, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for me in any
and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for EDUTREK
INTERNATIONAL, INC. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
incorporating such changes as any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems
appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-
fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 5th day of
March 1999.



                             /s/ Gerald Tellefsen
                             ----------------------
                             Gerald Tellefsen



                                ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                --------------

BEFORE me this 5th day of March 1999, came Gerald Tellefsen, personally known to
me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of
Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                             /s/ Dee Ann Stone
                             ------------------
                             NOTARY PUBLIC


                             State of Georgia
                                      -------

                             My Commission Expires:

                             February 1, 2003
                             ----------------
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bridge
Capital Holdings for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I, Thomas A. Sa, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of Bridge Capital  Holdings,  hereby
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  such Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in such Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Bridge Capital Holdings.


Date: August 3, 2006                               /s/ THOMAS A. SA
                                                   _____________________________
                                                   Thomas A. Sa
                                                   Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-74413, No. 333-83937, No. 333-39918, No. 333-45362, No. 333-48752, and No.
333-62860 on Form S-3 and in Registration Statements No. 333-83935 and No.
333-41186 on Form S-8 of MediaBay, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2003
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory
paragraphs relating to a change in method of accounting for goodwill and
intangible assets as described in Note 3 and to the restatement described in
Note 2), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaBay, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche
Parsippany, New Jersey
April 15, 2003
Robert Fitzgerald RODGERS v. STATE

CR-16-1216

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

– 1 –

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND FINAL JUDGMENT

Brian A. Williamson (CA Bar # 336547)

CALLAGY LAW, P.C. 

650 From Road – Suite 240

Paramus, New Jersey 07652

Telephone: (201)261-1700

Facsimile: (201)621-6236

E-mail: bwilliamson@callagylaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff PARKRIDGE LIMITED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong Kong 

Corporation, by Mabel Mak and 

MABEL MAK, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDYZEN, INC., a California 

Corporation, and PRAVEEN NARRA 

KUMAR, an individual

Defendants.

CASE NO. 16-CV-07387-JSW

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND 

FINAL JUDGMENT

INDYZEN, INC., a California 

Corporation,

Counter-Claimant,

v.

PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong Kong 

Corporation and RANDY GENE 

DOBSON, an individual,

Counter-Defendants.

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 296 Filed 12/18/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

– 2 –

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND FINAL JUDGMENT

Parkridge Limited and Indyzen, Inc., by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate 

and move the Court to amend the final judgment entered in this matter on March 15, 2023. The 

parties have conferred extensively regarding the calculations of damages, interest, and attorney’s 

fees and have reached an agreement on a form of judgment which clearly sets forth all amounts 

awarded or to be awarded by the Court in this matter, including as to awardable attorney’s fees 

consistent with the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation to Grant Attorney’s Fees [Dkt. 288] 

and Supplemental Report and Recommendation to Grant Attorney’s Fees [Dk. 295]. In the interest 

of ensuring clarity, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the proposed Amended 

Final Judgment as presented by the parties. 

DATED: December 18, 2023

STRUCTURE LAW GROUP

By /s/Christopher Addy

Christopher Addy

Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff 

INDYZEN, INC. and Defendant PRAVEEN 

NARRA KUMAR

///

DATED: December 18, 2023 CALLAGY LAW, P.C. 

By: __/s/Brian A. Williamson

 Brian A. Williamson, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterDefendants PARKRIDGE LIMITED and 

MABEL MAK

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 296 Filed 12/18/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 365 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 365

      Honoring the life, legacy, and achievements of MacNolia Cox.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2021

    Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Portman) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Honoring the life, legacy, and achievements of MacNolia Cox.

Whereas MacNolia Cox (Montiere) was born on January 12, 1923, in Kenmore, Ohio, 
        to her parents John Thomas Cox and Alberta (Evans) Key, and raised in 
        Akron, Ohio;
Whereas MacNolia was a member of Livingston Baptist Church and, as a child, 
        enjoyed reading the dictionary from A to Z to learn the definitions and 
        spellings of words;
Whereas, in 1936, at the age of 13, MacNolia won the Akron Spelling Bee at the 
        Akron Armory over the course of 2.5 hours, besting 50 other participants 
        and becoming the first Black participant to win the competition;
Whereas MacNolia won the Akron Spelling Bee with the word ``voluble'' in front 
        of 3,000 people, taking home a $25 prize and a ticket to Washington, 
        D.C., to compete in the Scripps National Spelling Bee;
Whereas, upon arriving in Washington, D.C., MacNolia was forced to stay in a 
        segregated hotel and was not permitted sit with the other participants 
        during the competition;
Whereas, during the competition, MacNolia was asked to spell the word 
        ``nemesis'', which at the time was capitalized and therefore barred from 
        the competition;
Whereas the use of this word in the competition was immediately protested by a 
        Beacon Journal reporter, and despite learning 100,000 approved words, 
        MacNolia misspelled the word and finished the competition fifth overall, 
        taking home a $75 prize;
Whereas, upon her return to Akron, MacNolia was greeted by a parade of hundreds 
        of cars of community members, where local dignitaries made speeches on 
        behalf of her success;
Whereas MacNolia went on to work as a domestic employee for a local doctor; and
Whereas MacNolia Cox Montiere died of cancer on September 12, 1976, at the age 
        of 53, and was survived by her husband John, stepson Nelson Montiere, 
        stepdaughter Joan Montiere Tabler, brother Otis Cox, sisters Orabell 
        Finney, Rosa Lee Jackson, and Ollie Davis, and 1 granddaughter: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors the life, legacy, and achievements 
of MacNolia Cox, an inspiration for young students of color today.
                                 <all>
```
Robert MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-7

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Franklin v. State*, 258 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 2018).