alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,071
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,378
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    127,409
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,600
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,527
<LOANS>                                        108,415
<ALLOWANCE>                                        374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 255,550
<DEPOSITS>                                     119,301
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,679
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,737
<LONG-TERM>                                    104,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 255,550
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,103
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,901
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   676
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,680
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,634
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,725
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,955
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      116
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  41
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,017
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,017
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.80
<LOANS-NON>                                        861
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   283
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       24
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  374
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               374
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
A.P. v. ETOWAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2170135

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 16, 2018

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.10

               ADDENDUM TO AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK PURCHASE AND
                    ACQUISITION AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 3, 2003

     This addendum ("Addendum"), dated April 3, 2003, modifies and supplements
the Amended and Restated Stock Purchase and Acquisition Agreement dated April 3,
2003 (the "Original Agreement") by and among Frontline Communications Corp.
("Frontline"), Proyecciones y Ventas Organizadas, S.A. de C.V. ("Provo"),
Ventura Martinez del Rio Requejo ("Requejo") and Ventura Martinez del Rio
Arrangoiz ("Arrangoiz").

     In the event of a conflict between the Original Agreement and this
Addendum, the terms of this Addendum shall control.

     1.   Page 2, Section 1.01 (f) of the Agreement shall be stricken in its
          entirety and replaced by the following:

          "Conversion Date" shall mean the date which is the later of: (i) the
          date on which the Series C Preferred and Series D Preferred (as
          defined below) converts to common stock of the Buyer, in accordance
          with section 3.03 or (ii) July 18, 2003, or such later date as agreed
          upon in writing by the Holders of a majority of the Series C
          Preferred. In the event the Conversion Date is delayed due to the
          actions or inaction of a third party regulatory or governmental
          agency, the Conversion Date shall be extended for an additional thirty
          (30) day period.

     2.   The Original Agreement, as modified by this Addendum, is hereby
          ratified and confirmed in all respects, is in full force and effect,
          and is binding on and enforceable against the parties in accordance
          with its terms.

     3.   This Addendum may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
          which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures
          thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.

     4.   This Addendum shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]





<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused its duly authorized
representative to execute this Amendment on the day and year first above
written.

     Frontline Communications Corp.


     By: /s/
     Stephen J. Cole-Hatchard


     By: /s/ Ventura Martinez Del Rio Arrangoiz


     Proyecciones y Ventas Organizadas, S.S. de C.V.


     By:
         /s/ Ventura Martinez del Rio Requejo

         /s/ Ventura Martinez del Rio Arrangoiz
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

Certification
of Chief Executive Officer

In connection
with the Annual Report of Apolo Gold & Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Bojtos, Chief
Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   |                          
|------------------ | -------------------------
|October 15,
  2009 | /s/ Peter
  Bojtos       
|                   |                          
|                   | Peter Bojtos             
|                   | Chief
  Executive Officer

---
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 332



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III No. CV-14-914 JASMINE HOLLOWAY APPELLANT

V.

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and MINOR CHILD APPELLEES Opinion Delivered May 20, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE GARLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. JV-2014-129] HONORABLE VICKI SHAW COOK, JUDGE SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED
PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge
Appellant Jasmine Holloway appeals from the Garland County Circuit Court’s order terminating her parental rights to her daughter, G.H. On appeal, Holloway contends that the circuit court erred in finding G.H. to be dependent-neglected, in finding aggravated circumstances as a basis for terminating her parental rights, and in “fast-tracking” the termination of her parental rights. We are unable to reach these arguments at this time because of deficiencies in Holloway’s addendum. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) (2014) requires that an appellant’s brief include an addendum consisting of all documents essential to the appellate court’s resolution of the issues on appeal, including, but not limited to: the pleadings; all motions, responses, replies, exhibits, and related briefs, concerning the order challenged on appeal; and the orderCite as 2015 Ark. App. 332

from which the appeal is taken. If we determine that deficiencies or omissions in the abstract or addendum need to be corrected, but complete rebriefing is not needed, then we may order the appellant to file a supplemental abstract or addendum within seven calendar days to provide the additional materials from the record to the members of the appellate court. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(4). In this case, the copy of the termination order found in Holloway’s addendum is missing several pages. Specifically, record pages 45a, 45b, and 46a are not found in the addendum. In addition, both Holloway and G.H.’s attorney ad litem filed responses to the Arkansas Department of Human Services’ petition to terminate Holloway’s parental rights; these documents, found at pages 156–59 of the record, are also missing from the addendum. Accordingly, Holloway has seven days in which to file a supplemental addendum in compliance with Rule 4-2(b)(4). We encourage counsel to review the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court as well as the record and addendum to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present. Supplemental addendum ordered. K INARD and H OOFMAN , JJ., agree. Kearney Law Offices , by: Jeffery H. Kearney , for appellant. Tabitha B. McNulty , County Legal Operations, for appellee. Chrestman Group, PLLC, by: Keith L. Chrestman , attorney ad litem for minor children.

2
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald Mercier, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10 QSB of M.E.R. Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6.   I have  indicated  in this  report  whether or not there  were  significant
     changes in internal  controls or in other factors that could  significantly
     affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the  date  of our  most  recent
     evaluation,  including any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant
     deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: July 18, 2005


By: /s/ Ronald Mercier
   ----------------------------------
   Ronald Mercier
   President and CEO, Chief Accounting Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOMINIQUE BARTEET,

Appellant,

v.

GEORGE J. JANSSEN,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2971

[August 3, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Robert G. Panse, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CA005039-XXXX-MB.

Chance McClain of Law Offices of Chance McClain, Lake Park, for 

appellant.

Michael P. Hamaway and Jason Ari Smith of Mombach, Boyle, Hardin 

& Simmons, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Susan CIVIC, Appellant, v. CENLAR, FSB, Daniel D. Civic, Voice of Hope, Inc., TD Bank, N.A., Clerk of the Circuit Court, Fifth Judicial Circuit, Lake County, Florida and Suntrust Bank, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-3442

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 7, 2019

Susan Civic, Leesburg, pro se.

Charles P. Gufford, of McCalla Raymer Liebert Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee. Cenlar, FSB.

No Appearance for Other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED without prejudice to challenge the trial court's personal jurisdiction over Susan Civic in a motion filed pursuant *884to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. We express no opinion on the merit of any such motion filed.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and amendment
thereto: Form S-3 No. 333-52708 Registration for Face-amount Certificate Companies
Form S-3 No. 333-109663 Registration Adding Securities to Prior Form S-3 Registration
Form S-8 No. 333-41671 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-41669 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-66026 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-41673 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-42131 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-66018 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-54734 Stock Grant Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-101318 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-87290 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-117113 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-117112 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Form S-8 No. 333-113892 401(K) SavingsPlus Plan of Beverly Enterprises, Inc. of our reports dated March 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Beverly Enterprises, Inc., Beverly Enterprises, Inc.
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Beverly Enterprises, Inc., included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Fort Smith, Arkansas
March 8, 2005
Tom BELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0839

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Vacated.

Dismissed.
W.B. v. STATE

CR-16-0959

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018 Reh. denied March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                            MERITOR AUTOMOTIVE, INC.

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                             AS OF DECEMBER 15, 1998


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
                                                                SECURITIES OWNED BY
                                                              -----------------------
         NAME AND JURISDICTION                                REGISTRANT   SUBSIDIARY
         ---------------------                                ----------   ----------
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>
Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems, LLC (Delaware)................    100%

Meritor Light Vehicle Systems, Inc. (Delaware)...............    100%

Meritor Automotive Canada Inc. (Canada)......................    100%

Meritor Automotive Limited (England).........................    100%

         Meritor France (France).............................                 100%

Meritor Automotive GmbH (Germany)............................     99%           1%*

Meritor do Brasil Ltda. (Brazil).............................                 100%**
</TABLE>

----------
*    1% of the voting securities of Meritor Automotive GmbH is owned by Meritor
     Heavy Vehicle Systems Limited.

**   100% of the voting securities of Meritor do Brasil Ltda. is owned by
     Meritor Participacoes Ltda., a holding company all of the voting securities
     of which is owned by Meritor Automotive, Inc.

         Listed above are certain consolidated subsidiaries included in the
financial statements of the Company. Unlisted subsidiaries, considered in the
aggregate, do not constitute a significant subsidiary.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of  Cannagistics Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended   October 31, 2020 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,   Rob Gietl Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations
of the Company for the periods presented.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/ Rob Gietl                                                        
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Rob Gietl                                                            
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director
|Date:  | December 15, 2020                                                    



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001040573
<NAME> COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              61
<SECURITIES>                                        34
<RECEIVABLES>                                      160
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (31)
<INVENTORY>                                         54
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   307
<PP&E>                                           4,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,477)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              936
<BONDS>                                          4,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,968
<SALES>                                          2,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,907
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   (2,945)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (363)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (402)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                        46
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (6)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (254)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> Loss before income tax benefit and other items excludes the effect of
minority interests, net of tax, of $108.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Emily Kathleen DONDERIS a/k/a Emily K. Grajales, Appellant, v. Juan Carlos DONDERIS, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1673

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.