alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AAA Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  December 12, 2007


/s/ Earl W. Abbott
---------------------------------------
Dr. Earl W. Abbott, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
DENIED; Opinion Filed June 5, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00745-CV

No. 05-13-00746-CV

IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON, Relator

On Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. W10-01183-J, W10-01184-J 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Fillmore 

Opinion by Justice Moseley

In these original mandamus proceedings, relator Senrick Wilkerson asks this Court to 

order the judge of the trial court to forward him copies of arrest reports and records and other 

documents related to the above cases and two other cases. The facts and issues are well known 

to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude 

relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 

318, 320–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of 

Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

130745F.P05

/Jim Moseley/

JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE
In the INTEREST OF D.T., a child.

C.T., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4320

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ANDREW MANYEVERE, ANITA MANYEVERE )

SITHEMBILE MANYEVERE, SIMANGALISO )

MANYEVERE, )

Petitioners, )

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-1004-N

) ECF

NURIA PRENDES, ET AL., )

Respondents. )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed February 24, 2006.

 

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01004-N Document 19 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 977
James LEDBETTER v. STATE

CR-16-1089

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institution effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992, issue of the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions that have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation website at 
                    *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html,*
                     or contact the Chief, Receivership Oversight at 
                    *RO@fdic.gov*
                     or at Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, FDIC, 600 North Pearl Street, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75201. Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10548
Pulaski Savings Bank
Chicago
IL
01/17/2025
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on January 21, 2025. Jennifer M. Jones, Deputy Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2025-01739 Filed 1-24-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section

906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantair, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Santo, Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|Date: February 14, 2008       
|                              
|/s/ Steven Santo              
|Name: Steven Santo            
|Title: Chief Executive Officer



25
4/12/24, 9 24 AM Print List

https //appsint fcc gov/ECLAS/itemList do?type publicCirculate&view fcc&fn print 1/1

Date

Circulated

Bureaus

Office

Docket

Number Title

04/05/2024 WTB Spectrum Rules and Policies for the Operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems

03/26/2024 WCB Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Federal-State Joint Board on Jurisdictional

Separations

03/20/2024 OEA Establishing a 5G Fund for Rural America, Second Report and Order, Order on

Reconsideration, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

03/05/2024 WCB Improving Competitive Broadband Access to Multiple Tenant Environments

02/21/2024 MB Sponsorship Identification Requirements for Foreign Government Provided Programming

01/26/2024 MB Amendment of Section 73.3556 of the Commission's Rules Regarding Duplication of

Programming on Commonly Owned Radio Stations, Order on Reconsideration

01/24/2024 MB, CGB Closed Captioning of Video Programming; Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of

Hearing, Inc., Petition for Rulemaking

07/12/2023 MB Fostering Independent and Diverse Sources of Video Programming

06/15/2023 WCB In the Matter of Data Caps in Consumer Broadband Plans

08/23/2022 EB Enforcement Bureau Order

08/23/2022 EB Enforcement Bureau Order

08/23/2022 EB Enforcement Bureau Order

08/23/2022 EB Enforcement Bureau Order

03/30/2022 WTB Implementing Federal Floodplain Policy Changes to Section 1.1307 of the Commission's

Rules, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Report of Champps Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 8, 2004 (the Report), I, William H. Baumhauer,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |  |                                                                                                                                              
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  September 8, 2004 |  | By: /s/ William H. Baumhauer
        William H. Baumhauer
        Chairman of the Board
        President and Chief
        Executive Officer
|                         |  |
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER 

























































UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

Plaintiff(s), 

 v. 

 

Defendant(s). 





















&DVH1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

APPLICATION FOR 

ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 

PRO HAC VICE

(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)

I, , an active member in good standing of the bar of 

 , hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 

Northern District of California representing: in the 

above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 

attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 

within the State of California. 

MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 

 

MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 

 

I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 

another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: . 

A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 

bar is attached to this application. 

I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 

Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: 

APPLICANT

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 

 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of is granted, 

subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 

appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 

designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 

Dated: 8/16/2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE October 2012

5HVHW )RUP

%HVWZD\ 86$ ,QF HW DO FY

6*5202 HW DO

-RKQ 6 $UW]

-RKQ 6 $UW]

-RKQ 6 $UW]

3ODLQWLIIV %HVWZD\ HQWLWLHV

&UDLJ $OOLVRQ

 6RXWK 0DLQ 6WUHHW 6XLWH 

$QQ $UERU 0LFKLJDQ 

 : &DOLIRUQLD $YHQXH 6WH 

6XQQ\YDOH &$ 

   

-6$UW]#GLFNLQVRQZULJKWFRP &$OOLVRQ#GLFNLQVRQZULJKWFRP





Eastern District of Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE October 201

he party.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUAN RAMON TIBURCIO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 160 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 23.1

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-effective
Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement on Form S-4 of Marcam Solutions,
Inc. filed on Form S-8 of our report, dated October 24, 1997, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of Marcam Solutions, Inc. as of September
30, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 1997
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 1 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 2 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 3 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 4 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 5 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 6 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 7 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 8 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 9 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 10 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 11 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 12 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 13 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 14 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 15 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 16 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 17 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 18 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 19 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 20 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 21 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 22 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 23 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-01912-BZ Document 228 Filed 12/04/08 Page 24 of 24
Case 3:05-cv-02149-K-BF Document 25 Filed 08/25/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 241
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART HUAWEI'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART HUAWEI'S 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 

SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1277

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Huawei’s motion to seal as 

follows. By Monday, January 14, 2019, at 5:00 p.m., Huawei shall refile a redacted public version

of the below document consistent with the Court’s sealing rulings.

Document Portion Ruling

Yu Deposition 43:23-44:8 DENIED.

Yu Deposition 47:17-24 DENIED. The Court’s previous ruling sealing this portion was 

in error. This portion does not satisfy the compelling reasons 

standard for sealing.

Yu Deposition 47:25-48:3 GRANTED.

Yu Deposition 70:20-25 DENIED. The Court’s previous ruling sealing the question was 

in error. This question does not satisfy the compelling reasons 

standard for sealing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2019 ______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1279 Filed 01/13/19 Page 1 of 1
A Web-Based Approach for Combining Metadata, Search, and Data Profiling

Jeff Butler, Internal Revenue Service (Research, Analysis, and Statistics), 

With nearly one petabyte of data serving hundreds of IRS research analysts, the 

Compliance Data Warehouse (CDW) brings together data and analytics for the world’s 

largest tax agency on a massive scale. Metadata are available for more than 25,000 

unique database columns and over 500,000 separate attributes through the CDW 

website and represents the largest database-driven repository of metadata in the IRS. 

Data profiling capabilities are also available through the CDW website, letting users 

quickly explore patterns through frequency tables, statistical distributions, trends, and 

geographic maps—often on billions of rows of data. 

This paper discusses a web-based approach used by CDW for combining metadata, 

search, and data profiling into a single experience. Rules for standardizing metadata 

are outlined—including column definition templates, lookup reference tables, data types, 

and other artifacts. A database-oriented format is proposed for organizing and 

displaying search results for data stored in relational databases. Finally, a solution is 

presented for adding data profiling capabilities to both metadata and search results to

let users dynamically explore and visualize patterns in data using a set of flexible adhoc database queries. Since it was implemented in 2009, this dynamic data profiling 

capability now accounts for roughly one-third of the 3,000 average daily database 

queries executed in CDW.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 15 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 15

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
   Comptroller of Currency relating to ``National Banks and Federal 
                   Savings Associations as Lenders''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2021

   Mr. Van Hollen (for himself, Mr. Brown, Mr. Reed, Ms. Warren, Ms. 
 Cortez Masto, Ms. Smith, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the 
   Comptroller of Currency relating to ``National Banks and Federal 
                   Savings Associations as Lenders''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of Currency relating to 
``National Banks and Federal Savings Associations as Lenders'' (85 Fed. 
Reg. 68742 (October 30, 2020)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Michael M. Thompson, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of The Wornick Company;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

----

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 16, 2006 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |   |
|                    |   |   |
|                    | By:    |  /s/ Michael M. Thompson |
|                    |   | Michael M.  Thompson |
|                    |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

2

----