9084 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 24 / Thursday, February 6, 2025 / Notices 

(a) The complainant is: Spanx, LLC, 

3035 Peachtree Rd. NE, STE 200, 

Atlanta, GA 30305. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Honeylove Sculptwear, Inc., 360 East 

2nd Street, Suite 703, Los Angeles, 

CA 90012 

Guangzhoushi Chiping Dianzi Maoyi 

Co. Ltd., Room 310–9 No.7 Building 

No.3, Xintang Ave., Tianhe District, 

Guangzhou, GD 510000, China 

Daerwene Inc., 4440 Arapahoe Ave. Ste 

215, Boulder, CO 80303, 

Guangzhoushi Cedong Shangmao, 

Youxiangongsi, Dongping Dongkeng 

Street, Baiyun, District, Guangzhou, 

GD 510000, China 

Bingrong Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Shi Fu 

Tianqu Huaqiangbei, Jiedao 

Huahangshe Quhuaqiang Bei Lu, 1005 

1007 1015 Haohuaqiang Dianzi, Shijie 

3 Haolou 2 Ceng, 32C073, Shenzhen 

Shi, GD 518000, China 

Dolce Vita Intimates LLC, 1000 First 

Street, Harrison, New Jersey 07029 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 31, 2025. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2025–02286 Filed 2–5–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1437] 

Certain Dryer Wall Exhaust Vent 

Assemblies and Components Thereof; 

Notice of Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 31, 2024, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of InOvate Acquisition Company 

of Jupiter, Florida. Supplements to the 

complaint were filed on January 2, 10, 

and 16, 2025. The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain dryer wall exhaust vent 

assemblies and components thereof by 

reason of the infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,953,230 

(‘‘the ’230 patent’’). The complaint, as 

supplemented, further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and a cease and 

desist order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Orndoff, The Office of Docket 

Services, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

January 31, 2025, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–4 of the ’230 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘wall exhaust vents’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: InOvate 

Acquisitions Company, 250 S Central 

Blvd., Suite 207, Jupiter, FL 33458. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Xiamen Dirongte Trading Co., Ltd., 

Room 1505, No. 11 Duiying Road, Jimei 

District, Xiamen City, 361024, China. 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations will not participate as a 

party in this investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 24 / Thursday, February 6, 2025 / Notices 9085 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 31, 2025. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2025–02287 Filed 2–5–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1422; 

Investigation No. 337–TA–1424] 

(Consolidated) 

Certain TOPCon Solar Cells, Modules, 

Panels, Components Thereof, and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of a 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Complainants’ Motion To 

Terminate Investigation as to 

Respondent Adani Green Energy Ltd. 

Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint 

and To Amend the Complaint To Add 

Respondent Mundra Solar PV Ltd. 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined not to review an initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 8) 

granting an unopposed motion to 

terminate the investigation as to 

respondent Adani Green Energy Ltd. 

based on withdrawal of the complaint, 

and to amend the complaint to add 

respondent Mundra Solar PV Ltd. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin S. Richards, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5453. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted Investigation No. 

337–TA–1422 on November 5, 2024, 

and Investigation No. 337–TA–1425 on 

December 9, 2024, based on complaints 

filed by Trina Solar (U.S.), Inc., Trina 

Solar US Manufacturing Module 1, LLC, 

and Trina Solar Co., Ltd. (collectively, 

‘‘Trina’’). 89 FR 87889 (Nov. 5, 2024); 89 

FR 97653 (Dec. 9, 2024). The 

complaints, as supplemented, 

collectively allege violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain TOPCon solar cells, modules, 

panels, components thereof, and 

products containing the same by reason 

of infringement of claims 1–11 of the 

U.S. Patent No. 9,722,104 and claims 1– 

17 of U.S. Patent No. 10,230,009. The 

complaints further allege that a 

domestic industry exists. The 

Commission’s notices of investigation 

collectively named as respondents 

Runergy USA Inc., of Pleasanton, CA; 

Runergy Alabama Inc., of Huntsville, 

AL; Jiangsu Runergy New Energy 

Technology, Co., Ltd., of Yangcheng 

City, China; Adani Solar USA Inc., of 

Irving, TX; Adani Green Energy Ltd., of 

Ahmedabad, India; CSI Solar Co., Ltd., 

of Suzhou, China; Canadian Solar Inc., 

of West Guelph, Ontario; Canadian 

Solar (USA) Inc., of Walnut Creek, CA; 

Canadian Solar Manufacturing 

(Thailand) Co., Ltd., of Bo Win, 

Thailand; Canadian Solar US Module 

Manufacturing Corporation, of 

Mesquite, TX; Recurrent Energy 

Development Holdings, LLC, of Austin, 

TX. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is participating 

in the investigations. Id. 

On January 21, 2025, the Commission 

consolidated the 1422 investigation and 

the 1425 investigation. 337–TA–1422, 

Order No. 5 (Dec. 20, 2024) and 337– 

TA–1425, Order No. 4 (Dec. 20, 2024), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Jan. 21, 

2025). 

On December 27, 2024, Trina filed a 

motion (‘‘Mot.’’) to withdraw the 

complaint and terminate the 

investigation as to respondent Adani 

Green Energy Ltd. (‘‘Adani’’). Trina also 

moved for leave to amend the complaint 

to add respondent Mundra Solar PV Ltd. 

(‘‘Mundra’’). Trina certified that the 

respondents and OUII did not oppose 

the motion. Mot. at 1. OUII filed a 

response in support of the motion. EDIS 

Doc ID 840766. 

On January 14, 2025, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 8) granting 

Trina’s unopposed motion to terminate 

the investigation as to Adani and to add 

Mundra as a respondent. ID at 8. The ID 

found the motion to terminate complies 

with Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1). Id. 

At 3. The ID also found that Trina 

showed good cause to amend the 

complaint to add Mundra as a 

respondent based on new information 

obtained during discovery. Id. at 6. No 

petitions for review of the IDs were 

filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The 

investigation is terminated with respect 

to Adani Green Energy Ltd. Mundra 

Solar PV Ltd. is a respondent in this 

investigation. 

The Commission vote for these 

determinations took place on January 

31, 2025. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 3, 2025. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2025–02302 Filed 2–5–25; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 


khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES