alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Deshawn Antwan ROBERTSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5329

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel C. Sibley, ChiefFinancial Officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managing generalpartner of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date:  November  14, 2007 |   | /s/ Dan Sibley                    |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
| ** **                          |   | Daniel C. Sibley                  |
|                                |   | Chief Financial Officer           |
|                                |   | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P. |

 

Thiscertification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference inany filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RICHARD A. CHANDLER, 1067609, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-1317-R

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, )

Director TDCJ-CID, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 7th day of December, 2006.

_________________________________

JERRY BUCHMEYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01317-R Document 17 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 268
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FINJAN, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF (SVK)

ORDER RE REDACTION OF ORDER 

ON CISCO SYSTEMS INC.'S MOTION 

TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FINJAN’S 

AMENDED EXPERT REPORT ON 

INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT NO. 

7,647,633

The Court’s Order on Cisco Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Portions of Finjan’s Aneded

Expert Report on Infringement of Patent No. 7,647,633 (the “Order”) has been filed under seal 

because it contains information that is the subject of sealing motions pending before the Court. By 

May 8, 2020, the parties are ordered to meet and confer and submit joint proposed redactions to 

the Order (if any are required), as well as supporting declaration(s) establishing that the redacted 

material is sealable and a proposed order. If no proposed redactions are received by 11:59 p.m. on 

May 8, 2020, the Court will unseal the Order in its entirety.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 28, 2020

SUSAN VAN KEULEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 583 Filed 04/28/20 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7314** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JAMES J. SAUNDERS, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Danville
. Jackson L. Kiser , Senior District Judge. ( 4:01

- cr - 30083

- JLK

- 5 ; 4:15

- cv - 80839

- JLK

- RSB )

Submitted : January 17, 201 7 Decided: January 20, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. James J. Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville , Virginia, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appel lee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James J. Saunders, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justi ce or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of t he denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Saunders has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Saunders’ motion for the appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
West Pointe Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary on Form S-8 (File No. 333-49990) and on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-68800) of our report dated January 17, 2002, appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Pointe Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

                                           /s/ RUBIN, BROWN, GORNSTEIN & CO. LLP
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               RUBIN, BROWN, GORNSTEIN & CO. LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 27, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 20

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2021

 Mr. Daines (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Crapo, Mrs. Capito, Mr. 
  Cramer, and Mr. Toomey) introduced the following joint resolution; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the 
                       flag of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within 7 years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical 
desecration of the flag of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                White Oak Campus Information

White Oak Campus Information Home
          About FDA
          Jobs and Training at FDA
          Buildings and Facilities
          White Oak Campus Information
          White Oak Shuttle Bus Stop Location at the Shady Grove Metro StationWhite Oak Campus Information White Oak Shuttle Bus Stop Location at the Shady Grove Metro Station
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintLocation of the White Oak Shuttle Bus Stop at the Shady Grove Metro Station

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      03/28/2018White Oak Campus Information
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
June 30, 2021 December 31, 2020

Assets

Cash and Cash Equivalents $                 67,164,755 $               664,599,964

Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations               5,385,940,469               4,512,617,639

Accrued Interest Receivable 24,845,230 22,295,711

Premium Receivable 230,100,917 255,365,000

Other Receivables ‐ ‐

Prepaid Expenses ‐ ‐

General Property, Equipment, and Software, Net 15,424 24,855

Total Assets $            5,708,066,795 $            5,454,903,169

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 576,955 $ 649,390

Farm Credit Insurance Fund

     Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance               5,707,489,840               5,454,253,779

Allocated Insurance Fund Balance

Total Insurance Fund $            5,707,489,840 $            5,454,253,779

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $            5,708,066,795 $            5,454,903,169

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Comparative Statement of Financial Condition

June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020

(Unaudited)

 
Calendar Year to Date Calendar Year to Date

June 30, 2021 June 30, 2020

Income

Premiums $              230,367,916 $              105,763,976

Interest Income on Investments 24,825,440 38,015,637

Total Income $              255,193,356 $              143,779,613

Expenses

Administrative Operating Expenses $ 1,957,295 $ 2,025,085

$ 1,957,295 $ 2,025,085

Net Income $              253,236,061 $              141,754,528

Balance at January 1, 2021 $           5,454,253,779

Payment to AIRAs Accountholders

Net Income 253,236,061

Balance at June 30, 2021 $           5,707,489,840

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Comparative Statement of Revenue and Expense

Period Ended June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020

(Unaudited)

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund

Period Ended June 30, 2021

(Unaudited)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of LHC Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Keith G. Myers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter J. Roman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Keith G. MyersKeith G. MyersChief Executive Officer(Principal executive officer)




/s/ Peter J. RomanPeter J. RomanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen P. McSherry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy M
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: May 15, 2006
/s/ Kathleen P. McSherry
Kathleen P. McSherry
Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial
Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

# **Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer ofVornado Realty L.P. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) 10-K for year ended December 31, 2015**(the “Report”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

|           |   |   |
|----------------|--------|--------|
| April 11, 2016 |   |   | /s/ Stephen  W. Theriot |
|           |   | Name:  | Stephen W. Theriot |
|           |   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer of Vornado  Realty Trust,

sole General Partner of Vornado  Realty L.P. |
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    They are the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Community Bancorp, a Nevada Corporation (the Company).2.
    
    Based on their knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
(the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Edward M. JamisonEdward M. JamisonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Patrick HartmanPatrick HartmanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 42
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 28 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to equal rights for men and women. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2021 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. 

BROWN, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. SMITH, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. WARREN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. 

BOOKER, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to equal rights for men and women. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 28 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Equality of rights under the law shall 

3 not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any 

4 State on account of sex. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to 

6 enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this 

7 article. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall take effect 2 years 

9 after the date of ratification.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3/7/2017

Case 4:17-cv-00205-HSG Document 12 Filed 03/07/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:05-cv-01526-M Document 1 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING INTEL’S MOTION TO SEAL QX0110

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING INTEL’S 

MOTION TO SEAL QX0110

Re: Dkt. No. 1296

Intel’s past and current motions to seal do not clearly identify which pages Intel seeks to 

seal. In the instant motion, QX0110 does not appear to have pagination. Intel’s proposed order 

appears to assume the pages are one number fewer than the ECF pagination. The Court therefore 

follows that convention. However, if Intel has any further sealing motions, Intel must clearly 

number the pages of documents it seeks to seal. 

Applying the compelling reasons standard, the Court rules on Intel’s motion to seal as 

follows: 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1305 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING INTEL’S MOTION TO SEAL QX0110

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

QX0110 7, 11, 17, 22-28, 30, 34, 37, 39, 

selected portions1

GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

 

1

In a declaration, Intel states that it seeks to seal those portions of QX0110 “marked with red 

boxes.” ECF No. 1296-2, ¶ 6. Intel has marked with red boxes portions of pages 7 and 34 of 

QX0110, but does not specifically identify those pages in its motion or proposed order. ECF Nos. 

1296, 1296-3. The Court presumes that Intel wishes to seal the portions on pages 7 and 34 marked 

with red boxes. Moving forward, Intel shall specifically identify all those portions of documents 

or testimony that it seeks to seal in both its motion to seal and its proposed order. 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1305 Filed 01/14/19 Page 2 of 2