alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                            Avis Group Holdings, Inc.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in thousands)

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                Ten Months     Two Months
                                                  Ended           Ended                   Years Ended December 31,
                                               December 31,    February 28,   -----------------------------------------------
                                                   2001            2001          2000       1999       1998          1997
                                                ------------   ------------   ---------   ---------  ---------    -----------
<S>                                             <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
EARNINGS AVAILABLE TO COVER FIXED CHARGES:
Income (loss) before income taxes               $ (69,850)    $ (42,237)    $  99,104    $  91,548    $ 112,228    $  50,323
Plus: Fixed charges                               266,924        59,082       413,670      348,808      271,001      251,404
Less: Equity income (loss) in unconsolidated
      affiliates                                                                                                         (37)
      Capitalization of interest                       22             4           165           94          151          144
                                                ---------     ---------     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges       $ 197,052     $  16,841     $ 512,609    $ 440,262    $ 383,078    $ 301,620
                                                =========     =========     =========    =========    =========    =========
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest, including amortization of
deferred financing costs                          231,697        51,797     $ 368,191    $ 292,482    $ 211,968    $ 188,058
Interest portion of rental payment @ 33.3%         35,227         7,285        45,479       56,326       59,033       63,346
                                                ---------     ---------     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
Total fixed charges                             $ 266,924     $  59,082     $ 413,670    $ 348,808    $ 271,001    $ 251,404
                                                =========     =========     =========    =========    =========    =========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                   0.74          0.29          1.24         1.26         1.41         1.20
                                                =========     =========     =========    =========    =========    =========
</Table>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of The A
Consulting Team, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003, I, Shmuel BenTov,
the principal executive officer of The A Consulting Team, Inc., hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
                  31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
                  for the year ended December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of The A Consulting Team, Inc., on a consolidated
                  basis.

         This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K.



March 26, 2004                       /s/ Shmuel BenTov
--------------                     -------------------
Date                               Name:   Shmuel BenTov
                                   Title:  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                           President










A signed original of this written statement required by ss. 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BESTWAY (USA), INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PIETRO PASQUALE-ANTONI SGROMO, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00205-HSG 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

CORRECT JUDGMENT; DENYING 

MOTION TO MODIFY JUDGMENT; 

GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. Nos. 154, 155

Currently before the Court is a motion by Plaintiffs Bestway (USA), Inc., Bestway (Hong 

Kong) International Ltd., and Bestway Inflatables and Material Corporation (collectively, 

“Bestway”) to correct the judgment and to modify the judgment to include additional attorneys’ 

fees, Dkt. No. 155 (“Mot.”), along with a motion to file under seal, Dkt. No. 154.1

The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to correct the judgment because the proper cost 

award was $4,702.20 (rather than the stated $4,072.20). Therefore, the correct total award was 

$82,541.70 in attorneys’ fees and costs, to be paid out of the royalty fund that is the subject of this 

interpleader action.

However, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to modify the judgment for an additional

$35,254.00 in attorneys’ fees incurred between July 25, 2018 and February 25, 2019. See Mot. at 

2. Given the shifting nature of this litigation and the continual accrual of fees, the Court denies 

the request at this time to prevent continued motions for attorneys’ fees from delaying appellate 

proceedings. The Court denies the motion for additional fees without prejudice to this request 

being raised on remand, should Plaintiffs prevail in the Court of Appeals.

 

1 The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is 

deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b).
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Finally, the Court GRANTS the motion to file under seal, because, as the Court has 

already found, the value of the royalty payments are properly sealable. See Dkt. No. 140 at 4.

The Court will enter the amended judgment in a separate order.

Per the Court’s May 14, 2019 order, Dkt. No. 153, all deadlines imposed by the amended 

judgment remain stayed until after all appeals have been resolved in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

5/31/2019
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
Nathan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.





Date: May
17, 2010





/s/ Richard
      NathanChief
      Executive Officer
                      Innovative
      Card Technologies, Inc





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Apolo Gold & Energy Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Dinning, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 25, 2005                  /s/ Robert Dinning
------------------               -----------------------------------
                                 Robert Dinning
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 17-cv-00220 LHK (NC) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

QUALCOMM INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00220 LHK (NC)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART QUALCOMM’S

REQUEST TO COMPEL FTC 

INTERROGATORY RESPONSES

Re: Dkt. No. 623

Before the Court is Qualcomm’s request to compel amended responses by the FTC 

to two contention interrogatories. In the interest of judicial efficiency, the Court rules 

immediately and without need for a hearing. The specific interrogatory requests and 

responses are attached to the discovery letter brief and are only summarized here. Dkt. 

Nos. 623, 624.

In interrogatory request no. 5(e), Qualcomm seeks “the date, if any, on which each 

product identified ... [the identified relevant products] ceased to be within the relevant 

product market, and a detailed description of why that is the date the product ceased to be 

in the relevant product market.” The FTC’s answer states that “the FTC does not know the 

date on which each discontinued product was discontinued . . . [and] does not know the 
Case No. 17-cv-00220 LHK (NC) 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

date on which [relevant products] was no longer considered for inclusion within flagship 

or premium tier handsets.” Dkt. No. 623 at 5. 

The Court finds that the FTC has answered the interrogatory sufficiently. If, 

however, the FTC later learns additional or corrective information that has not otherwise 

been disclosed, it must supplement its response in accordance with Rule 26(e).

In interrogatory request no. 13, Qualcomm asks the FTC to identify “specific 

instances in which a rival baseband processor supplier incurred increased costs caused by 

any [anticompetitive] conduct of Qualcomm, identify the amount of any such increased 

costs, and provide all facts concerning or supporting your response.” The FTC’s core 

answer is that “The tax imposed by Qualcomm represents an economic cost to all rival 

baseband processor suppliers.” Dkt. No. 623 at 6.

The Court agrees with Qualcomm that (1) this interrogatory requests relevant 

information, and (2) the FTC’s response is a legal generality, where specific facts are 

requested. Therefore, the FTC is ordered to amend its response to request no. 13 by March 

23, providing specific facts and identifying specific rivals and specific costs.

No costs or fees are awarded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 16, 2018 _____________________________________

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

NO. 01-14-00463-CV

In re Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, Rodolfo L. Garcia, 

and Brandon C. Stroh

and

NO. 01-14-00467-CV

Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, et al.

v.

Stephen B. Lee, M.D., P.A. et al.

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Please take notice that effective Thursday June 25, 2015, the suite number for 

Brian M. Keller, State Bar No. 00784376, has changed and he requests that service of 

notices and all other documents be made upon him at:

KELLER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

2500 West Loop South, Suite 308

Houston, TX 77027

281.853.9456 Phone

713.600.5804 Facsimile

bkeller@kellerattorneys.com

ACCEPTED

01-14-00463-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

6/26/2015 9:29:31 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/26/2015 9:29:31 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
 2

Respectfully submitted,

KELLER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

By:/s/ Brian M. Keller

Brian M. Keller

State Bar No. 00784376

2500 West Loop South, Suite 300

Houston, TX 77027

281.853.9456 Phone

713.600.5804 Facsimile

bkeller@kellerattorneys.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been forwarded to 

all counsel of record June 26, 2015.

Via E-Filing:

Mr. Jeffrey Potts

Mr. Larry Veselka

Mr. Jarod Stewart

Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, L.L.P.

700 Louisiana, Suite 2300

Houston, Texas 77002

jpotts@skv.com

lveselka@skv.com

jstewart@skv.com

Via E-Filing:

Patrick R. Cowlishaw

Jackson Walker L.L.P.

901 Main Street, Suite 6000

Dallas, Texas 75202

pcowlishaw@jw.com

Via E-Filing:

Mr. Paul D. Clote

Law Office of Paul D. Clote

Four Houston Center

1221 Lamar St., Suite 1090

Houston, Texas 77010-3038

Via E-Filing:

Fields Alexander

Beck Redden LLP

1221 McKinney Street, Ste. 4500

Houston, Texas 77010

falexander@beckredden.com

/s/ Brian M. Keller

Brian M. Keller
# m8624.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.10.2017 C(2017) 6881 final To the notifying party Subject : Case M. 8624 – MICHAEL KORS / JIMMY CHOO Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 15 September 2017 , the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Michael Kors Holdings Limited (British Virgin Islands) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Jimmy Choo PLC (United Kingdom) by way of a public bid announced on 25 July 2017 . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for undertaking Michael Kors Holdings Limited: design, development, distribution, wholesale, retail and licencing of branded luxury accessories, footwear and appare l, - for undertaking Jimmy Choo PLC: design, development, distribution, manufacture, wholesale, retail and licencing of branded luxury footwear and accessories . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 315 , 22 . 9 . 2017 , p. 3 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne L. Laufer,
        Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
        as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
              
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 /s/
        WAYNE L. LAUFER
 Wayne
        L.
        Laufer
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 August
        8, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00011-DMR 

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

The court has been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appears that no issue 

remains for the court’s determination.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED 

with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not reached, any party may move to reopen the 

case and the trial will be rescheduled, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of this 

order. All scheduled dates, including the trial and pretrial dates, are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2018

______________________________________

DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

 

**Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of Vornado Realty Trust (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that**:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005**(the “Report”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
| March 9, 2006 | /s/          Steven  Roth |                                                                                            |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | Name:                                                                       | Steven Roth                                                                                     |
|          | Title:                                                                      | Chief Executive Officer  of Vornado  Realty Trust, sole general partner of  Vornado Realty L.P. |
|               |                                                                             |                                                                                                 |  |

 

----
Gregory D. WOODSON v. STATE

CR-16-1257

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018 Reh. denied February 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.