alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1337

KENNETH SMITH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MEGAN J. BRENNAN , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv - 01097

- CMH

- MSN )

Submitted : August 31, 2018 Decided: September 6, 2018

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Kenneth Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM: Kenneth Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his amended complaint alleging employment discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (2012). The

cour t dismissed Counts I and II for failure to allege facts establishing that Smith was the victim of intentional unlawful discrimination and Count II for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders , 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). Because the district court identified deficiencies that Smith m ay remedy by filing an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Smith seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619, 623

- 24 (4th Cir. 2015); Do mino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Smith to file an amended complaint. See Goode , 807 F.3d at 630. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Apolo Gold & Energy Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
Bojtos, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

September 28, 2006                 /s/ Peter Bojtos
-------------------                -----------------------------------
                                   Peter Bojtos
                                   Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
Order entered October 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00772-CV

PATRICK DAUGHERTY, Appellant

V.

HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04005

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 17, 2019 notice informing the Court that appellee 

Highland Capital Management, L.P. has filed for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy 

Court for the District of Delaware. This automatically suspends further action in this appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

Accordingly, we ABATE this appeal. It may be reinstated on prompt motion by any 

party complying with Rule 8.3 and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this 

Court. See id. 8.3.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roland
O. Burns, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ ROLAND O.
BURNS


Roland O.
Burns


Chief
Financial Officer


August 8,
2008
Keathel CHAUNCEY, Esq., as Trustee only, under the 25264 Padre Ln Land Trust, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Jane B. Robinson ; and Section 23, Property Owner's Association, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-3881

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CX8260 

REDACTED VERSION 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1286-6 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1286-6 Filed 01/14/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1286-6 Filed 01/14/19 Page 3 of 3
IIA 

Calendar No. 355 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 41 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health and 

Human Services relating to ‘‘Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, 

Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2022 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CRUZ, Ms. ERNST, Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. HAWLEY, 

Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mrs. 

HYDE-SMITH, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. COTTON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. HAGERTY, 

Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. MORAN, Mr. 

TUBERVILLE, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. LEE, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. YOUNG) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Health and Human Services relating 

to ‘‘Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, ClientCentered, Quality Family Planning Services’’. 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 41 PCS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘En5 suring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, 

6 Quality Family Planning Services’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 56144 

7 (October 7, 2021), and such rule shall have no force or 

8 effect. 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS

dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 355 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 41 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapFamily Planning Services’’. Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Human Services relating to ‘‘Ensuring Access to submitted by the Department of Health and ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
# L_2017210DE.01001701.xml

| 15.8.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 210/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 210/17

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Richtlinie (EU) 2017/593 der Kommission vom 7. April 2016 zur Ergänzung der Richtlinie 2014/65/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates im Hinblick auf den Schutz der Finanzinstrumente und Gelder von Kunden, Produktüberwachungspflichten und Vorschriften für die Entrichtung beziehungsweise Gewährung oder Entgegennahme von Gebühren, Provisionen oder anderen monetären oder nicht-monetären Vorteilen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 87 vom 31. März 2017
  )

Seite 514, Artikel 11 Absatz 2 Buchstabe a Ziffer i:

Anstatt:

„die Erbringung nicht-unabhängiger Anlageberatung und den Zugang zu einer breiten Palette geeigneter Finanzinstrumente,“

muss es heißen:

„die Erbringung nicht-unabhängiger Anlageberatung zu einer breiten Palette geeigneter Finanzinstrumente und den Zugang dazu,“.

Seite 514, Artikel 11 Absatz 2 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

„ohne materiellen Vorteil für den betreffenden Kunden;“

muss es heißen:

„ohne konkreten Vorteil für den betreffenden Kunden;“.

---
1 SHEPP ARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

A Limited Liability Partnership 

2 Including Professional Corporations 

GARY L. HALLING, Cal. Bar No. 66087 

3 ghalling@sheppardmullin.com 

MICHAEL W. SCARBOROUGH, Cal. Bar No. 203524 

4 mscarborough@sheppardmullin.com 

MONA SOLOOKI, Cal. Bar No. 215145 

5 msolouki@sheppardmullin.co� Four Embarcadero Center, 17 Floor 

6 San Francisco, California 94111-4109 

Tele.Phone: 415.434.9100 

7 Facsimile: 415.434.3947 

8 Attorneys for Non-Parties 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

9 SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SMRH:487889782.1 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK 

The Hon. Lucy H. Koh 

DECLARATION OF DAVID CHONG 

IN SUPPORT OF PARTY'S JOINT 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE 

UNDER SEAL 

CHONG DECL. VS/0 JOINT 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, 

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendant 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 882 Filed 09/27/18 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 882 Filed 09/27/18 Page 2 of 6
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 882 Filed 09/27/18 Page 3 of 6
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 882 Filed 09/27/18 Page 4 of 6
Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 882 Filed 09/27/18 Page 5 of 6
1 

2 

ATTESTATION 

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-l(i)(3), I, Gary L. Halling, attest that the signatory of this 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

document, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs with the filing's content and has 

authorized the filing. 

Dated: September 27, 2018 

SMRH:487889782.1 

SHEPP ARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 

Isl Gary L. Halling 

GARYL. HALLING 

CHONG DECL. VS/0 JOINT 

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 882 Filed 09/27/18 Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of our report dated March 1, 2001 appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of VORNADO REALTY L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2000:


VORNADO REALTY L.P.:
       Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-36080 on Form S-3
       Registration Statement No. 333-64015 on Form S-3
       Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-50095 on Form S-3
       Registration Statement No. 333-52573 on Form S-8
       Registration Statement No. 333-29011 on Form S-8
       Registration Statement No. 333-09159 on Form S-8
       Registration Statement No. 333-76327 on Form S-3
       Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-89667 on Form S-3
       Registration Statement No. 333-81497 on Form S-8


VORNADO REALTY L.P.:
       Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-40787 on Form S-3
       Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-29013 on Form S-3




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
March 1, 2001
Mary TRAYNOR, Appellant, v. WINTER PARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, LTD. and City of Winter Park, Florida, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-653

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

Billie Jo Belcher and Heather A. Trombly, of Legally Pink Law, PLLC, Winter park, for Appellant.

Michael J. Roper and Anna E. Engelman, of Bell & Roper, P.A., Orlando, and Cameron E. Shackelford and Alexander Muszynski, III of Meier, Bonner, Muszynski, O'Dell & Harvey, P.A., Longwood, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 12.1


                          COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Years Ended December 31,

                                                         2001               2000               1999
Earnings (loss) before fixed charges (1):
<S>                                                    <C>                <C>                <C>
     Income (loss) before extraordinary items
          and cumulative effect of accounting
          changes                                      ($ 360.9)          $  113.1           ($ 247.5)

     Minority interest                                                                         (107.9)

     Income tax expense (benefit)                         (36.6)             299.9              (46.2)

     Fixed charges                                        585.4              531.9              362.9
                                                       --------           --------           --------

                                                       $  187.9           $  944.9           ($  38.7)
                                                       ========           ========           ========

Fixed charges (1):

     Interest expense                                  $  546.1           $  515.7              352.9

     Interest expense on notes payable
          to affiliates                                    39.3               16.2               10.0
                                                       --------           --------           --------

                                                       $  585.4           $  531.9           $  362.9
                                                       ========           ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (2)                     0.32               1.78               --

<FN>
_______________________

(1)  For the purpose of  calculating  the ratio of  earnings  to fixed  charges,
     earnings  (loss)  consist of earnings  (loss) before  extraordinary  items,
     cumulative  effect of accounting  changes,  minority  interest,  income tax
     expense  (benefit),  and fixed charges.  Fixed charges  consist of interest
     expense and interest expense on notes payable to affiliates.

(2)   For the year ended December 31, 1999,  earnings,  as defined  above,  were
      inadequate to cover fixed charges by $401.6 million.
</FN>
</TABLE>
EX PARTE Lamont James WILLIAMS

CR-17-0077

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
<PAGE> 1
                                                             Exhibit 23(i)







                  Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Equality Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-43655 on Form S-8 of Equality Bancorp, Inc. (Equality) of our report
dated May 8, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Equality
Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, cash flows, and
comprehensive income for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 1998, which report appears in the March 31, 1998 annual report on
Form 10-KSB of Equality.



                              /s/KPMG LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
May 3, 1999
EX PARTE Adrian K. DUNCAN

CR-17-0300

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Phillip R. Bennett, asChief Executive Officer of Refco Group Ltd., LLC and Refco Finance Inc. (together,the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2005 asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: July 15,  2005 |                         |
|----------------------------|------------------------------|
|                       |                         |
|                       | /s/  Phillip R. Bennett |   |
|                       | Phillip R. Bennett           |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer      |

 

1

----
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHIRON CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SOURCECF, INC., SOURCECF CLINICAL

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.,

MAXOR NATIONAL PHARMACY SERVICES

CORPORATION d/b/a IV SOLUTIONS,

FOUNDATION CARE L.L.C., and

PHARMACEUTICAL SPECIALTIES, INC.,

Defendants. /

No. C 05-01938 WHA

FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER

FOR GOOD CAUSE and after a final pretrial conference, the Court issues the

following final pretrial order: 

1. This case shall go to a BENCH TRIAL on APRIL 17, 2006, at 7:30 A.M., and shall

continue until completed on the schedule discussed at the conference. The issues to be tried

shall be those set forth in the joint proposed pretrial order except to the extent modified by order

in limine. This final pretrial order supersedes all the complaint, answer and any counterclaims,

cross-claims or third-party complaints, i.e., only the issues expressly identified for trial remain

in the case. 

Case 3:05-cv-01938-WHA Document 101 Filed 04/04/06 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. The first four motions in limine by plaintiffs and defense motions in limine

numbers 3 and 4 are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion in limine number 5 is GRANTED and there

will be no need for either side to get into “off label” uses. The others will be ruled on soon.

3. Except for good cause, each party is limited to the witnesses and exhibits

disclosed in the joint proposed final pretrial order less any excluded or limited by an order

in limine. Materials or witnesses used solely for impeachment need not be disclosed and may

be used, subject to the rules of evidence. 

4. The stipulations of facts set forth in the joint proposed final pretrial order are

approved and binding on all parties and now part of the evidentiary trial record. 

5. Each side shall have TEN HOURS to examine witnesses (counting direct

examination, cross-examination, re-direct examination, re-cross examination, etc.). 

Opening statements and closing arguments shall not count against the limit. 

6. The parties shall follow the Court's current Guidelines for Trial and

Final Pretrial Conference, separately provided and available on the Internet at

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, which guidelines are incorporated as part of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 4, 2006. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-01938-WHA Document 101 Filed 04/04/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 4, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02200]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12646]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``What Drawing Can Be: Four 
Responses'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``What drawing can be: four 
responses'' at the Menil Drawing Institute, The Menil Collection, 
Houston, Texas, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 257-1 of December 
11, 2015.

Rafik K. Mansour,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2025-02200 Filed 2-3-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Steven N. ALEXANDER, DOC #138353, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2976

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.