alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Developing Censuses an Analysis System for Agricultural Surveys and 

Arnie Wilcox and Robert Hood 

U.S. Department of Agriculture 

National Agricultural Statistics Service 

3251 Old Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22030 

phone: 703.235.5218 

email: amie_wilcox@nass.usda.gov 

Keywords: Analysis, Census of Agriculture, Surveys, Graphical 

In conducting the 1996, responsibility for the Census of Agriculture was transferred from 

Bureau of the Census to the United States Department of Agriculture, National 

Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). Since planning activities were well underway for 

for data processing. These the 1997 Census of Agriculture, legacy systems were used 

systems were somewhat antiquated and differed greatly from those used to process NASS 

survey data. As a result, NASS initiated a Project to Re-engineer and Integrate Statistical 

Methods (PRISM). The goal of this project was to develop methodology and systems to 

more effectively process census and survey data. 

were The existing census analytical review process used static listings that not very user 

friendly. As a result, the need for a new data analysis system was recognized and became 

part of the PRISM effort. Development was done in SAS AF and focused on meeting 

dynamic, graphically based system. It was designed to allow analysts' desires for a more 

access to data earlier in a processing cycle and provide an easier interface for resolving 

data problems. 

of The analysis system includes five tool sets. The first is a series listings designed to 

highlight records with data problems that must be resolved or should be reviewed 

because there is a high likelihood that they will affect published aggregates. The second 

includes micro level analysis tools and the third macro level analysis tools. The fourth 

use and contains ad-hoc queries that are more flexible and tool set is for optional 

but also less user friendly. The fifth tool set provides management features to powerful, 

track the analysis process and ensure proper data review. 

There will be 2002 a demonstration of analysis tools used for the Census of Agriculture. 

There will also be an opportunity to discuss the challenges encountered during 

developmentlimplementation of the system and plans for using this new system for future 

NASS surveys. 

86 

Page 200
SLL/MOATT 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: BOON GLOBAL LIMITED; et al. 

______________________________ 

BOON GLOBAL LIMITED; et al., 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF 

CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND, 

Respondent, 

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation, 

Real Party in Interest.

No. 18-71347 

D.C. No. 4:16-cv-07387-JSW 

Northern District of California, 

Oakland 

ORDER

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

This petition for a writ of mandamus raises issues that warrant an answer. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 21(b). Accordingly, within 14 days after the date of this order, 

the real party in interest shall file an answer. 

The district court, within 14 days after the date of this order, may address the 

petition if it so desires. The district court may elect to file an answer with this 

court or to issue a supplemental order and serve a copy on this court. Petitioner 

may file a reply within 5 days after service of the answer(s). 

FILED

JUL 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 67 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 2 Case: 18-71347, 07/19/2018, ID: 10948278, DktEntry: 3, Page 1 of 2
SLL/MOATT 2 18-71347 

The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court and District Judge

White.

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 67 Filed 07/19/18 Page 2 of 2 Case: 18-71347, 07/19/2018, ID: 10948278, DktEntry: 3, Page 2 of 2
STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND PROPOSED ORDER; CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00129-JST 

 

 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DONALD H. MEDEARIS, SBN 206849 

BAY AREA LEGAL AID 

1800 Market Street, 3rd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94102 

Telephone: (415) 354-6331 

Fax: (415) 982-4243 

dmedearis@baylegal.org 

Attorney for Plaintiff, 

JENNIFER PIRACHA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

JENNIFER PIRACHA,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

NANCY A.BERRYHILL, Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration, 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 3:17-CV-00129-JST 

 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 

PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

)

)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between parties, through their representative 

counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of 70 days to file her 

Motion For Summary Judgement in response to Defendant's Answer . The new date for filing 

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgement will be August 7, 2017. 

This extension is necessary because Donald H. Medearis substituted in as Plaintiff's 

attorney on May 10, 2017, and although he represented the Plaintiff in her Social Security 

Appeals Council case, he did not represent her at her Administrative Law Judge hearing, 

needs more time to familiarize himself with the law and facts of the case and has a heavy 
STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND PROPOSED ORDER; CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00129-JST 

 

 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

caseload and work schedule. Plaintiff's Attorney apologizes to the Court and Opposing 

Counsel for the delay. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be 

modified accordingly. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: May 10, 2017 /s/Donald H. Medearis 

 DONALD H. MEDEARIS 

 BAY AREA LEGAL AID 

 

Dated: May 10, 2017 BRIAN STRETCH 

 United States Attorney 

 SARA WINSLOW 

Chief of Civil Division 

DEBORAH STACHEL 

 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

 Social Security Administration 

By: /s/Jennifer A. Kenney 

 (* as authorized by e-mail on May 10, 2017) 

 JENNIFER A. KENNEY 

 Special Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 

ORDER: 

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED 

Dated: ____________ By:_____________________________ 

 THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR 

 

 

May 16, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

 Judge Jon S. Tigar
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 18, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 22
- 00048
- CV IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF L.M., AN INCAPACI TATED PERSON

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR
- 20
- 02447
- 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Carlyle, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Myers Appellant Karla Murillo appeals from the trial court’s December 22, 2021
order a ppointing appellee VetGuard USA as permanent guardian of the person over
L.M. On March 4, 2022, the probate court vacated the December 22 order and replaced VetGuard USA with Christian F. Clausen as guardian. In light of the March 4 order, we questioned whether the appeal was moot and directed the parties to file letter briefs. The parties complied. A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. , 166
S. W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) . Appellate courts lack jurisdiction over moot– 2

–

controversies. See Olley v. HCM, LLC , 449 S.W.3d 572, 575 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. denied). In her letter brief, M urillo asserts the probate court lacked jurisdicti on to render the March 4 order because its plenary power expired thirty days after the December 22 order was signed. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 329b(d). In a probate matter, however, the trial court retains authority to remove a guardian and appoint a successor guardian

. See T EX
. E ST
. C ODE §§ 1203.051 ( removal without notice ), 1203.052 ( removal with notice ) , § 1203.102 (appointment of successor guardian). Murillo also asserts the trial court erred in rendering the March 4 order. Becaus e Murillo did not appeal this order and the time to do so has passed , we do not address
this merits

- based argument. Because the probate court had the authority to vacate the appealed order appointing VetGuard USA as guardian and did so , this appeal is now moot. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

220048f.p05 /Lana Myers/ / LANA MYERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF L.M., AN INCAPACITATED PERSON
No. 05

- 22

- 00048

- CV On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR

- 20

- 02447

- 1. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Carlyle and Goldstein participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee VetGuard USA recover its costs of this appeal from appellant Karla Murillo.
Judgment entered this 18 th day of August, 2022.
Leza TELLAM, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK N. A., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019.

J. Andrew Meyer, Esq. of J. Andrew Meyer, P.A., of Redington Beach, for Appellant.

Sara F. Holladay-Tobias, Esq., of McGuireWoods, LLP, of Jacksonville for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Javier JIMENEZ-JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-265

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Elizabeth Plaza,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Manuel O. Morera, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Elizabeth Plaza
            /s/
                Manuel O. MoreraElizabeth
                Plaza
            Manuel
                O. MoreraChief
                Executive Officer
            Chief
                Financial Officer





June
      14,
      2007
Miguel Angel VARGAS-SANTIAGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER REQUIRING ERICSSON TO FILE SEALED UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF DOCUMENTS FOR 

SEALING MOTION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER REQUIRING ERICSSON TO 

FILE SEALED UNREDACTED 

VERSIONS OF DOCUMENTS FOR 

SEALING MOTION

Re: Dkt. No. 1391

Before the Court is Ericsson’s administrative motion to seal. ECF No. 1391. Ericsson has

mistakenly filed two copies of the redacted versions of its documents and has failed to file

unredacted versions of the documents it seeks to seal. Thus, the Court cannot evaluate the 

information Ericsson seeks to seal. Ericsson shall file the unredacted versions of its documents so 

that the Court can asses Ericsson’s motion to seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1393 Filed 01/23/19 Page 1 of 1
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      13, 2009 |   |                                    |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |   | /s/ Mark D. Roberson                    |
|                                    |   | Mark      D. Roberson                   |
|                                    |   | Acting      Chief Executive Officer and |
|                                    |   | Chief      FinancialOfficer             |
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 51 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 51

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2022

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Government of Egypt is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 21-0M, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on May 26, 2022:
                    (A) The following Major Defense Equipment (MDE): 
                four (4) MK 49 MOD 5 RAM Guided Missile Launching 
                Systems (GMLS) (MDE).
                    (B) The following non-MOE: support equipment; 
                sparing; U.S. Government and contractor technical 
                assistance; and U.S. Government non-technical support.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                          NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
                             2000 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN
              (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 14, 2002)

         WHEREAS, NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY (the "Company") has heretofore
adopted the NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY 2000 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN (AS AMENDED AND
RESTATED EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 14, 2002) (the "Plan") for the benefit of certain
employees of the Company; and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of
July 28, 2003:

         1.       Subparagraph II(f) of the Plan shall be deleted and the
following shall be substituted therefor:

                  "(f)     "COMMITTEE" means the Compensation Committee of the
         Board."

         2.       The following new Subparagraph (d) shall be added to Paragraph
IV of the Plan:

                  "(d)     DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY BY THE COMMITTEE.
         Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Paragraph IV or any
         other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Committee may from
         time to time, in its sole discretion, delegate all or a portion of its
         powers, duties and responsibilities under the Plan to a subcommittee of
         the Committee. In particular, the Committee may delegate the
         administration (or interpretation of any provision) of the Plan, and
         the right to grant Awards under the Plan, to a subcommittee consisting
         solely of two or more members of the Committee who are outside
         directors (within the meaning of the term "outside directors" as used
         in section 162(m) of the Code and applicable interpretive authority
         thereunder and within the meaning of "Non-Employee Director" as defined
         in Rule 16b-3). The Committee may put any conditions and restrictions
         on the powers that may be exercised by such subcommittee upon such
         delegation as the Committee determines in its sole discretion, and the
         Committee may revoke such delegation at any time."

         3.       As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and
reaffirmed.
# L_2018031EN.01011401.xml

| 3.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/114 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/114

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2017/1908 of 12 October 2017 on the putting into effect of certain provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Visa Information System in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 269 of 19 October 2017
  )

On page 40, recital 10:

for:

‘... which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, points B and G of Council Decision 1999/437/EC (8).’,

8

read:

‘... which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Council Decision 1999/437/EC (8).’.

8

On page 41, recital 11:

for:

‘... which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, points B and G of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC (2).’,

2

read:

‘... which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point B of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC (2).’.

2

---
CLAYTON PROVIDERS, INC. v. James ROPER

2170084

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BROADCOM CORPORATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART BROADCOM 

CORPORATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1120

The Court rules on Broadcom Corporation’s (“Broadcom”) administrative motion to seal 

as follows. Broadcom shall file a public version of the following document sought to be sealed in 

compliance with the instant sealing order by January 8, 2019.

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

JX0095 BCRM000251-before

Report of the Chief 

Executive Officer on 

BCRM000255.

DENIED.

JX0095 From Report of the 

Chief Executive 

Officer on 

BCRM000255 to 

BCRM000258.

GRANTED.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1163 Filed 01/07/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BROADCOM CORPORATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

JX0095 BCRM000260. DENIED.

JX0095 BCRM000277-279. DENIED.

JX0095 BCRM000280-284. GRANTED.

JX0095 BCRM000285-286. DENIED.

JX0095 BCRM000287-290. GRANTED.

JX0095 BCRM000291-292. DENIED.

JX0095 BCRM000297-301. DENIED.

JX0095 BCRM000302-305. GRANTED.

JX0095 BCRM000306-307. DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1163 Filed 01/07/19 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00039-M Document 31 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 369
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of The Wornick Company (the “Company”) for the thirteen andthirty-nine week periods ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M.Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006 |   |   |   |                                  |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   |   |                                  |
|                    |   | By:    |   | /s/ Michael M. Thompson               |
|                    |   |   |   | Michael M. Thompson                   |
|                    |   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

Asigned original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----