alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-30883

_____________________

VINCENT LaPRIME,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DR. PALLAZZO, ET AL.,

Defendants,

DAVID WALTERS, JR., Deputy,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CV-3130-F)

_________________________________________________________________

October 9, 1996

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Vincent LaPrime filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against

Deputy David Walters, Jr. and others, alleging that Walters had

injured LaPrime’s wrist by using excessive force while trying to

handcuff LaPrime. A key issue at trial was whether LaPrime had

reacted violently to Walters’ initial attempt to handcuff him. The
district court admitted the testimony of Dr. Richard Richoux, a

psychiatrist who had previously treated LaPrime while LaPrime was

incarcerated in a prison psychiatric ward. Dr. Richoux testified

that LaPrime suffers from anti-social personality disorder, and

that manipulative behavior and aggressive reactions to authority

figures are typical of that disease. LaPrime appeals the jury

verdict against him, arguing that Richoux’s testimony was

inadmissible character evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 404(a).

Rule 404(a) states generally that “[e]vidence of a person’s

character or a trait of character is not admissible for the purpose

of proving action in conformity therewith . . .” The Federal Rules

of Evidence do not define the term “character trait.” Other courts

and authorities, however, have concluded that a character trait is

“an element of one’s disposition.” See United States v. West, 670

F.2d 675, 682 (7th Cir. 1982) (holding that “limited intelligence”

was not a character trait). 

Having considered these authorities and the arguments of the

parties, we conclude that Dr. Richoux’s testimony, concerning the

mental disease with which LaPrime had been diagnosed, was properly

admitted as expert medical opinion that would assist the jury in

determining a disputed issue of fact. Fed.R.Evid. 702. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

A F F I R M E D.
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC (the "Fund") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



Date: August 11, 2005      By: /s/Robert E. Swanson
                               -----------------------
                               Robert E. Swanson
                               President and Chief Executive Officer
                               (principal executive officer)


Date: August 11, 2005      By: /s/Kathleen P. McSherry
                               --------------------------
                               Kathleen P. McSherry
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                               (principal financial and accounting officer)

A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy M Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 17, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (“PERF”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Project Navigator, Ltd. (A Verdantas Company), Tustin, CA, has become a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PERF intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 10, 1986, PERF filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 15, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(h) of the Act on October 11, 2024 (89 FR 82632).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-01824 Filed 1-27-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smartmetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: May 24, 2010
By:
/s/ Colin HendrickColin HendrickPresident (Principal Executive Officer)
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Employment Arrangement  - Anthony J. Bettencourt



 EXHIBIT 10.42 
  
 On March 4, 2003, the Board of Directors of Verity, Inc. approved a new employment arrangement with Anthony J. Bettencourt in connection with his
appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer of Verity. This new arrangement included: 
  
 1.    the grant of a stock option to purchase 300,000 shares of Verity’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of such stock on the date of grant, which grant shall
vest over two years in 24 equal monthly installments until fully vested or employment is terminated, whichever occurs first, the vesting of which shall accelerate in full upon termination without cause following a change of control, and shall have a
term of eight years and a post-termination exercise period of twelve months; and 
  
 2.    the annual rate of compensation of $500,000 with an annual incentive bonus of $175,000, subject to the achievement of milestones and/or other criteria. 
  
 On August 6, 2003, the Compensation Committee of Verity also approved the
form of employment agreement to be used with Mr. Bettencourt which, in addition to the above and other standard provisions, also included severance benefits of 12 months base salary continuation and full payment of the annual incentive bonus in the
event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00215-CV

Dresser Industries, Inc., Appellant

v.

Dorothy A. Lehmann, et al., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 26,342-B, HONORABLE EDWARD P. MAGRE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Dresser Industries, Inc. has notified this Court that its bankruptcy

proceeding that caused its appeal to be stayed has terminated. Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a). Appellant has also notified us that the parties have settled the underlying

proceedings and has moved to dismiss its appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: March 3, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 25, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Mark Urbania, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ M. MARK URBANIA                                                            
|M. Mark Urbania                                                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

April 26, 2007
Michael Darnell OLIVER v. STATE

CR-16-1201

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
Stacey RUSSO, Appellant, v. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSP. and PMA Management Corp., Appellees.

No. 1D18-3812

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 12, 2019

Mark L. Zientz of Law Offices of Mark L. Zientz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Kimberly J. Fernandes of Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Rowe, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
1 Michael J. Astrue has been appointed as the new Commissioner of Social Security,

effective February 12, 2007, and is therefore substituted as Defendant in this matter for Jo Anne B.

Barnhart, per FED. R. CIV. P. 25(d)(1).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ABILENE DIVISION

LARRY D. FULLER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE1

, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

) Civil Action No.

Defendant. ) 1:05-CV-236-C

ORDER

 THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation filed

February 20, 2007 (Doc. 24). No written objections have been filed. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the findings and conclusions in the Report and

Recommendation are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the court, that the Defendant’s

motion to reverse and remand is GRANTED, and that this cause is reversed and remanded to the

Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 405 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Upon remand and after further consideration of the evidence in the record, the ALJ should

appropriately consider the severity and limitations imposed by all of Plaintiff’s impairments; further

consider whether Plaintiff’s impairments meet the criteria of Section 12.05C of the Listing of

Impairments, both singly and in combination; and further develop the record, including a

psychological evaluation and expert testimony from a medical examiner specializing in psychology.

 

 Case 1:05-cv-00236-C Document 25 Filed 03/22/07 Page 1 of 2 PageID 88
2

The ALJ should also further develop the record as to Plaintiff’s mental and intellectual functioning

prior to age 22, to include school and any other relevant records which can be obtained.

Dated March 22, 2007.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 1:05-cv-00236-C Document 25 Filed 03/22/07 Page 2 of 2 PageID 89
**EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley Hawkings, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 21, 2007

By: ***/s/ Bradley Hawkings***

Bradley Hawkings

Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:05-CV-1805-L 

(ECF)

KEELY DAVIS, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment. Upon consideration, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. 

2. This cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED this ___day of _______________, 2006. 

 ______________________________________ 

 SAM A. LINDSAY 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: 

Steven E. Clark, Esq. 

Scott A. Forman, Esq. 

Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-16 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 121
Exhibit  21.1

<TABLE>
                                       Jurisdiction of                Percentage of
Name of Subsidiary                      Incorporation                    Ownership
----------------------------------     ---------------                -------------
<S>                                     <C>                               <C>
Brissonneau & Lotz Marine USA, Inc.     Delaware                          100%

World Rig Leasing Company               Delaware                          100%
     Ilion, LLC                         Delaware                           50%

Friede Goldman Canada Inc.              The Government of 
                                        Newfoundland and
                                        Labrador                          100%

Friede Goldman Newfoundland Limited     The Government of
                                        Newfoundland and
                                        Labrador                          100%

Friede & Goldman, Ltd.                  Mississippi                       100%

Friede Goldman Offshore, Inc.           Mississippi                       100%
 
Friede Goldman France SAS               France                            100%
     Achere                             France                            100%
       BLM                              France                            100%
       BOPP                             France                            100%
            Trawler Rabelais            France                             10%
            Trawler Villion             France                             10%
       SCI Lesvenez                     France                            100%
       SCI Du Croissant                 France                            100%

Friede Goldman International 
   FSC Incorporated                     Barbados                          100%

Friede Goldman Delaware, Inc.           Delaware                          100%


</TABLE>
Case 3:05-cv-01575-M Document 5 Filed 09/08/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16
Case 3:06-cv-00276-L Document 51 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 5 PageID 367
Case 3:06-cv-00276-L Document 51 Filed 08/21/06 Page 2 of 5 PageID 368
Case 3:06-cv-00276-L Document 51 Filed 08/21/06 Page 3 of 5 PageID 369
Case 3:06-cv-00276-L Document 51 Filed 08/21/06 Page 4 of 5 PageID 370
Case 3:06-cv-00276-L Document 51 Filed 08/21/06 Page 5 of 5 PageID 371
Hui Xie and Deborah B. Rolka

FCSM 2023 @ Maryland

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

Division of Diabetes Translation, CDC

Discovering Hidden Patterns in County-Level Diagnosed 

Diabetes Prevalence in The United States Using Neural 

Networks: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis From 2011 to 2020
Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of 

the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Outline

 Introduction 

 Spatio-Temporal Analysis: A Machine Learning Approach 

 Results

 Discussion
Introduction

 Despite a slowdown in national diabetes prevalence over the past decade in the 

United States, trends in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes are highly variable at 

lower geographic levels.

 This study aims to unveil intricate patterns and relationships in diabetes 

prevalence at the county level.

 We applied small area estimation (SAE) techniques to estimate county-level 

diagnosed diabetes incidence rates, using data sourced from the Behavioral Risk 

Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

 We thoroughly analyzed ten years of county-level diagnosed diabetes prevalence 

data spanning from 2011 to 2020 to unravel the hidden patterns. The data is 

expressed as changes from prevalence in 2011
County-level Diagnosed Diabetes Prevalence in the U.S., 2011- 2022

Methods

 We applied unsupervised classification, a Neural Network architecture, to identify 

the patterns within county-level trends across ten survey years.

 We then employed a Spatial Autoregressive model to capture the spatial patterns 

and relationships across counties

 We assessed the model's performance using appropriate spatial evaluation metrics, 

including Moran's I, Local Indicators of Spatial Associations (LISA), and spatial 

cross-validation metrics
Results I : Temporal Analysis


Results II. Spatial Analysis
Global Moran’s I

Discussions

 We identified distinct temporal patterns in the trends of county-level diagnosed 

diabetes prevalence, with 37.62% of counties having a continuously increasing 

trend, while others displayed more intricate patterns. 

 Meanwhile, we observed notable spatial variations, with 22.89% of counties 

(mostly located in the southeast) having consistently higher changes of prevalence 

than others. 

 The findings provide insights into the temporal and spatial dynamics of diabetes 

prevalence and could inform targeted interventions to help reduce diabetes 

prevalence in the most affected areas.

 Two limitations: (1) The analysis covered a ten-year period. A more extended time 

frame might provide a broader perspective on trends; (2) the uncertainties of 

county-level estimates by SAE were not counted, which will be considered in 

future studies
Thank You
Case 3:05-cv-01230-H Document 16 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 69
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: April 4, 2008 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
Elvin J. MONTELEONE and Janet S. Monteleone, Appellants, v. CITRUS HILLS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Hampton Hills, LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-23

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Travis THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2019

Travis Thomas, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.