alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSH WHITAKER, MONIQUE §

JANNETTE and LESLIE GREER, §

§

Plaintiffs, § CIVIL ACTION NO.

§

v. § 3:03-CV-0411-P

§

WEST VILLAGE LIMITED § CLASS ACTION

PARTNERSHIP and PPC/IMA §

INTOWN VILLAGE LIMITED §

PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., §

§

Defendants/Cross-Claimants/Third-Party Plaintiffs. §

_______________________________________________________________________

PATRICIA SAPP, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. §

§ 3:06-CV-1018-P

CWS APARTMENT HOMES, L.L.C., §

ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

In light of the Parties’ Ninth Supplemental Joint Status Report, the Court hereby instructs

the Parties as follows:

 Each Party is instructed to file a brief setting forth its discussions of the two remaining

issues for resolution no later than April 30, 2010. Responses, if any, may be filed no later than

Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 302 Filed 04/12/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2872
2

May 10. The Court will not accept the filing of any reply briefs without a showing of good

cause.

It is SO ORDERED, this 12 day of April 2010. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:03-cv-00411-P Document 302 Filed 04/12/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID 2873
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of
Pennsylvania (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




                                    /S/
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    NAME: THOMAS A. VENTO
                                    TITLE: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


DATE:  MAY 16, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania
and will be retained by Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       29
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 833 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services to negotiate fair prescription drug prices 

under part D of the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, 

Mr. BROWN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. COONS, Ms. CORTEZ

MASTO, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HASSAN, 

Mr. HEINRICH, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Mr. KELLY, Mr. KING, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. 

PETERS, Mr. REED, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. SMITH, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WARNER, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. 

WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate 

fair prescription drug prices under part D of the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Empowering Medicare 

5 Seniors to Negotiate Drug Prices Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 833 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE FAIR PRICES FOR MEDI2 CARE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–11 of the Social 

4 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–111) is amended by strik5 ing subsection (i). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

8 of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 60 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 60

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
 Education relating to ``Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, 
 and Selection Criteria-Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter 
 Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); 
  Grants to Charter Management Organizations for the Replication and 
 Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to 
 Charter School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and 
   for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools 
                         (Developer Grants)''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2022

 Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Burr, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. 
 Rubio, Mr. Braun, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Lankford, 
   Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
Risch, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Young, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, 
 Mr. Paul, and Mr. Graham) introduced the following joint resolution; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
 Education relating to ``Final Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, 
 and Selection Criteria-Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter 
 Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to State Entities (State Entity Grants); 
  Grants to Charter Management Organizations for the Replication and 
 Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to 
 Charter School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and 
   for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools 
                         (Developer Grants)''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to ``Final 
Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria-Expanding 
Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools Program (CSP)-Grants to 
State Entities (State Entity Grants); Grants to Charter Management 
Organizations for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter 
Schools (CMO Grants); and Grants to Charter School Developers for the 
Opening of New Charter Schools and for the Replication and Expansion of 
High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer Grants)'' (87 Fed. Reg. 40406; 
published July 6, 2022), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau

David Furth, Deputy Chief

Nicole McGinnis, Deputy Chief 

Sonja Rodriguez, Deputy Chief 

Jim Schlichting, Senior Deputy Chief 

Maureen Bizhko, Chief of Staff 

Kenneth Carlberg, Chief Technology Officer 

Jeffery Goldthorp, Associate Chief

Office of the Bureau Chief

Drew Morin, Deputy Chief 

James Wiley, Deputy Chief 

George Donato, Associate Chief

Cybersecurity & Communications 

Reliability Division

Zenji Nakazawa, Associate Chief 

Austin Randazzo, Associate Chief 

Renee Roland, Special Counsel 

Rochelle Cohen, Communications Director 

Ronnie Banks, Assistant Bureau Chief for 

Management

Debra Jordan, Bureau Chief

Justin Cain, Chief 

Shawn Cochran, Deputy Chief 

Michael Connelly, Deputy Chief 

William Kang, Deputy Chief

Mark Stadnicki, Operations Center Director 

James Pierson, HFDF Center Director

Policy & Licensing 

Division

John Evanoff, Chief 

Brenda Boykin, Deputy Chief 

David Sieradzki, Deputy Chief 

Tracy Simmons, Licensing Chief

Operations and Emergency

Management Division

Revised: 3/11/2024
Adoniss PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4218

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

Adoniss Porter, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Gerald T. WALDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4398

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Rachel Roebuck, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bilal Ahmed Faruqui, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
D'Antonio Keith WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3016

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE B.E.

1170071 (CR-16-0529)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Carlos DE CESPEDES and Jorge De Cespedes, Appellants, v. KENDALL HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD., etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-1311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019.

Damian & Valori, LLP, and Melissa Damian Visconti and Melanie E. Damian, for appellants.

Tache, Bronis, Christianson and Descalzo, P.A., and Walter J. Tache and Gavrila A. Brotz, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Anthony WEAVER v. KLEINSCHRODT CABINETS OF MOBILE, INC.

2160826

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10614 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus ROBERTO ARMANDO RUBIO-NAVARRO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CR-010-01 - - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Roberto Armando Rubio-Navarro has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief, the points raised by Rubio-Navarro in response to that brief, and the record, and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HASHIBO DEWITT LACY, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. MARK NOOTH, Respondent - Appellee. No. 10-36031 D.C. No. 6:08-cv-01300-AA
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 9, 2011 Portland, Oregon Before: FISHER, GOULD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. Petitioner Hashibo Lacy appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. 

# FILED
JUL 01 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Lacy claims that the Oregon courts unreasonably applied Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 318–19 (1979), contending that his conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence. But Lacy has not shown that “the state court’s ruling on [his] claim . . . was so lacking in justification that there was an error well understood and comprehended in exis ting law beyond any possibility for fairminded disagreement.” Harrington v. Richter , 131 S. Ct. 770, 786–87 (2011). There is at least “a reasonable argument,” id. at 788, that Lacy’s conviction satisfies the Jackson standard. The Oregon courts reasonably could have determined that there was sufficient eviden ce that Lacy “use[d] or threaten[ed] the immediate use of physical force” against K illam with the requisite intent. Or. Rev. Stat. § 164.395. Because Lacy’s habeas petition does not raise a colorable federal claim, we need not reach the question of whethe r Lacy exhausted his state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2) (“An application for a writ of habeas corpus may be denied on the merits, notwithstanding the failure of the applicant to exhaust the remedies available in the courts of the State.”); Cassett v. Stewart , 406 F.3d 614, 624 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that a federal court may deny an unexhausted habeas petition on the merits “when it is perfectly clear that the applicant does not raise even a colorable federal claim”).3 AFFIRMED.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-2445

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Nyle Thomas Brocks lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________ Submitted: February 22, 2022 Filed: March 15, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Nyle Brocks appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. Brocks argues that the district court abused its discretion by

1 The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence after giving insufficient weight to

mitigating factors such as his personal history, especially his traumatic childhood; and giving too much weight to his criminal history. We conclude that Brocks’s sentence was not substantively unreasonable, as there is no indication that the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. David , 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); United States v. Pickar , 666 F.3d 1167, 1169 (8th Cir. 2012). The court made an individualized assessment based on the facts presented in its consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Stults , 575 F.3d 834, 849 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Navidec Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, John R.
McKowen, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18 USC  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 14, 2007


/s/John R. McKowen
-------------------------------------------------------------------
John R. McKowen, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman
and Director


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DERRICK CHAPPELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 694 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Lisa NISWANDER and Samuel Niswander v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

2170206

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 6, 2018

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 19 (Thursday, January 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01910]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 30, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 23, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1318 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1145, K2025-1145.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-01910 Filed 1-29-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0587

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSE MARTINEZ JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 27, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 20 2023

01/20/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0587
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10230 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JESUS ZUVIETA

- TORRES
,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 63

- 1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Zuvieta

Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zuvieta

- Torres h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 25, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10230 Document: 00514697569 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2018No. 18

- 10230

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit hdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-10230 Document: 00514697569 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2018
Matthew D. PETITHOMME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-35

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 2:05-cv-00136-J Document 19 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 188
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00136-J Document 19 Filed 08/09/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 189
Christopher F. SEILER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D19-1525

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EX PARTE Richard J. JENKINS

1161149 (CR-16-0660)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
# C_2019155EN.01000601.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH v EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH

(Case C-437/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of workers - Article 45 TFEU - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 7(1) - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality - Right to paid annual leave based on the seniority of the worker with the employer - Account taken only in part of previous periods of service completed with other employers - Social law - Disparity between the schemes and legislation of the Member States)

(2019/C 155/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH

Defendant: EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which, for the purposes of determining whether a worker with 25 years of professional experience is entitled to an increase in his paid annual leave from five to six weeks, the years of service completed with one or more employers prior to the start of the worker’s period of service with his current employer account for only a maximum of five years of professional experience, even if their actual number is more than five.

---

(1)  OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.

---
Carwin Junior PETTIS Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-418

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Calvin P. MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-419

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019.

Calvin P. Moore, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.