alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MATT TEGLIA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM,

INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 17-00014 WHA

ORDER RE STIPULATION

ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

On March 29, plaintiff in this action filed a “Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Allowing

Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint” (Dkt. No. 17). On the same day, and without

waiting for court action on the proposed order, plaintiff also filed the amended complaint (Dkt.

No. 18). It is unclear whether plaintiff purports to amend “with the opposing party’s written

consent” or seeks to amend “with . . . the court’s leave.” See F.R.C.P. 15(a)(2). The stipulation

itself — spanning two pages inexplicably separated by a copy of the amended complaint —

seems to indicate that defendants have consented to the amendment. The stipulation, however,

fails to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), which requires plaintiff’s counsel to “attest that

concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from” defense counsel. 

Insofar as plaintiff’s filing is a stipulated request for leave to file an amended complaint,

it is DENIED. If plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint, then plaintiff’s counsel must file a

Case 3:17-cv-00014-WHA Document 20 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

corrected stipulation or request that fully complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

and our Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2017. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:17-cv-00014-WHA Document 20 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 2
Martha J. MCCONNELL, Appellant, v. Bruce TAYLOR, AS TRUSTEE OF the Spencer C. TAYLOR and Helen B. Taylor Declaration of Trust Dated 1/15/2004 and Marilyn T. Shumway, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-1194

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Daniel TREVINO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1264

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Walter S. FUNDERBURK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-148

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2019

Walter S. Funderburk, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Case 3:06-cv-00175-G Document 4 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 86
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00175-G Document 4 Filed 01/27/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 87
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00175-G Document 4 Filed 01/27/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 88
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Housing & Land Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      May 14, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Xiaohong FengXiaohong
      Feng(Chief
      Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,624
<PP&E>                                           2,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                     931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,918
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                         869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,623
<SALES>                                         12,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,959
<CGS>                                            3,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (4)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    382
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<FN>
Earnings per share basic (EPS-PRIMARY) and diluted reflects the adjustment for
income taxes as if the company were a C corporation for the entire period.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 40 Filed 06/01/2005 Page 1 of 2

GW Equity LLC et al v. PBS Global Inc et al Doc. 40

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-00800 Document 40 Filed 06/01/2005 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Pan Pacific RetailProperties, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-72551, 333-37564, 333-64736, 333-103498 and 333-106250 each on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-61169, 333-51384 and 333-105585 each on Form S-8 of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. of our report dated March 10,2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement Schedule III, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

March 10, 2005
Isreal WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-1086

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2019

Isreal Williams, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Wolf and Winokur, JJ., concur; Kelsey, J., concurs in result.
Julian N. MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-946

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-73035) pertaining to the P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. 1996
Employee Stock Option Plan, 1997 Restaurant Management Stock Option Plan, 1998
Stock Option Plan and 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of P.F. Chang's China
Bistro, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 30, 2001, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                        ----------------------

Phoenix, Arizona
February 15, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice; cancellation of meeting date.

                    The National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     January 16, 2025, in FR Doc. 2025-00982 at 90 FR 4806, concerning a meeting of the Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science & Engineering. The meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 13, 2025, at 1 p.m. (ET) is cancelled.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Please contact Crystal Robinson                         *crrobins@nsf.gov*                         or 703-292-8687.                    

Dated: January 23, 2025.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer, National Science Foundation.

[FR Doc. 2025-01844 Filed 1-28-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
John JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-5174

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Identificador Único de Plan: F0005937974123ABC456EMC789

(555) 555-5555

https://www.example.com/privacy

https://www.example.com/network-management

https://www.example.com

fcc.gov/consumer

https://www.example.com/discounts

Mbps

Mbps

ms

$/GB

GB

000

000

00

000

https://www.example.com/data-usage

Descripción de la tarifa $00.00

Descripción de la tarifa

Descripción de la tarifa

Descripción de la tarifa

$00.00

$00.00

$00.00

Descripción de la tarifa

Descripción de la tarifa

$00.00

$00.00

incluidos/según ubicación/$00.00

$00.00

$00.00

Año(s) Mes(es)

$00.00

Año(s) Mes(es)

https://www.example.com/terms-of-contract

Sí/No

Nombre del proveedor

Nombre del plan de servicios y/o tramo de velocidad 

de internet

Declaración de transparencia para el usuario de servicios de 

internet de banda ancha [fija/móvil]
Case 2:05-cv-00242-J Document 7 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 131
K.M. v. LEE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2161021

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 2018

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 

Maysville Marketsquare Associates, L.P. 

NorthCoast Health Center (JV Partnership) 

North Coast Health Center, LLC 

New NCHC, Inc. 

Pan Pacific (Cable Park), LLC 

PanPacific (Clackamas), Inc. 

Pan Pacific (Clackamas), LLC 

PanPacific (Portland), LLC 

Pan Pacific (Pinecreek), L.P. 

PanPacific (Rancho Las Palmas), LLC 

Pan Pacific (RLP), Inc. 

PanPacific (Sunset Mall), LLC 

Pan Pacific Development (Chino), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Kentucky), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (New Mexico), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Olympia Square), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Rosewood), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee) Acquisition, Inc. 

Pan PacificDevelopment (Tennessee), L.P. 

Pan Pacific U.S. Shopping Center I, LP 

Sahara Pavilion North U.S., Inc. 

West Coast Property Maintenance, LLC 

Plaza Escuela Holding Co., LLC 

Pan Pacific (CTA), Inc. 

CT Operating Partnership, L.P. 

Willowbrook Center Partnership 

Haagen Central Partnership 

Vermont-Slauson Shopping Center, LTD. 

CT Retail Properties Finance II, LLC 

CT Retail Properties Finance III, LLC

T Retail Properties Finance IV, LLC 

CT Retail PropertiesFinance V, LLC 

CT Retail Properties Finance VI, LLC 

CT RetailProperties Finance 14, LLC
---

EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, Donald
A. Gilles, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September,
30, 2009, of Valley Commerce Bancorp;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:





(a.)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b.)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c.)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter of 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a.) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b.) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
November 14, 2009








/s/ Donald A. GillesDonald
      A. GillesPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
V.I. Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-62925, 333-62927, 333-58601, 333-87625, 333-87627 and
333-94427) of V.I. Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2001
relating to the balance sheets of V.I. Technologies, Inc. as of December 30,
2000 and January 1, 2000 and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 30, 2000, which report appears in the December 30, 2000 annual report
on Form 10-K of V.I. Technologies, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP
Melville, New York
March 14, 2001
SUCCESSION OF Frank ANDERSON, Jr.

NO. 2019-C-0445

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

*577Not Considered. Not timely filed. See La.S.Ct.R. X, § 5(a).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1056

ALBERT D. PEABODY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION OF PALM BEACH

GARDENS, FLORIDA; NATIONSBANK, N.A.; WILLIAM

ISENBERG; HENRY HANDY; STEVEN M. SORENSEN; KIM

LEFTWICH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-624-3)

Submitted: March 31, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert D. Peabody, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Henry Cannon Spalding,

III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia; Jonathan

P. Harmon, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia; Keith Allen May, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia,

for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) and Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3 (1994)

and denying his motions for appointment of counsel and default

judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Appellant’s action under § 1983 was barred by the statute of limitations and was not cognizable against the private Defendants.

Appellant also failed to state a claim under Title VII. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

F5: Testing a New Combined Race/Ethnicity 

Question in Household Surveys

Agency Findings and Results

Rebecca L. Morrison

Director, Behavioral Science Research Center

Office of Survey Methods Research

FCSM Research & Policy Conference

October 25, 2023
1997’s SPD 15

Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, & Presenting Federal Data on Race & Ethnicity

Two-Questions Format for 

Self-Response with Minimum Categories

Source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1997-10-30/pdf/97-28653.pdf

Note: SPD 15 does not dictate the order in which the minimum categories

should be displayed on Federal information collections. Agencies generally order

alphabetically, as shown here, or by population size. PRE-DECISIONAL + DELIBERATIVE - DO NOT CIRCULATE 2
Revising SPD 15

Where Are We?

→ June 2022: Chief Statistician of the United States (CSOTUS) announced formal review to revise 

SPD 15 and convening of Federal Interagency Technical Working Group on Race and Ethnicity 

Standards (Working Group)

→ January 2023: OMB released Federal Register Notice which includes Working Group’s initial 

proposals on revising SPD 15, open from January 27 – April 27

→ Fall 2023: CFO Act Agencies, recognized Statistical Agencies, and EEOC vote on 

recommendations

PRE-DECISIONAL + DELIBERATIVE - DO NOT CIRCULATE 3
January 2023 Federal Register Notice

Initial Proposed Example Designs for 

Self-Response Data Collections

4

Combined Question with 

Minimum and Detailed Categories

Combined Question with 

Minimum Categories

PRE-DECISIONAL + DELIBERATIVE - DO NOT CIRCULATE
Working Group Conducting Additional Research

To Supplement Extensive Knowledge 

Example Research Areas:

1. Combined question without Some Other Race category

2. Modifications to question stem and instructions

3. Establishment and business surveys

4. Bridging factors

Examples of Methods:

1. Exploratory interviews

2. Cognitive interviews

3. Respondent debriefings

4. Unmoderated online testing

5. Split-sample ballot testing

The Working Group is collaborating with multiple 

agencies on conducting qualitative and quantitative 

testing. Participating agencies include:

• Bureau of Justice Statistics*

• Bureau of Labor Statistics*

• Census Bureau*

• Department of Defense*

• Department of Housing and Urban Development

• Energy Information Administration

• General Services Administration

• National Center for Education Statistics*

• National Center for Health Statistics*

• National Center for Science and Engineering 

Statistics*

• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

Administration*

• U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural 

Statistics Service*

PRE-DECISIONAL + DELIBERATIVE - DO NOT CIRCULATE 5
6 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov

Contact Information

Rebecca L. Morrison

Director, Behavioral Science Research Center

Office of Survey Research Methods

www.bls.gov/osmr

202-691-5715

Morrison.Rebecca@bls.gov
Case 3:05-cv-01499-L Document 5 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 19
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01499-L Document 5 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 20