alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA 

Calendar No. 305 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 37 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention relating to ‘‘Requirement for Persons To Wear Masks While 

on Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2022 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. SCOTT of 

Florida, Mr. WICKER, Mr. COTTON, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mrs. HYDESMITH, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. LEE, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. BOOZMAN, 

Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DAINES, and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced 

the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

MARCH 15, 2022 

Committee discharged; by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and placed 

on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention relating to 

‘‘Requirement for Persons To Wear Masks While on 

Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SJ 37 PCS 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Cen4 ters for Disease Control and Prevention relating to ‘‘Re5 quirement for Persons To Wear Masks While on Convey6 ances and at Transportation Hubs’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 8025 

7 (February 3, 2021); determined through a letter of opin8 ion from the Government Accountability Office dated De9 cember 14, 2021, and printed in the Congressional Record 

10 on December 15, 2021, on pages S9206–S9208, that the 

11 order is a rule under the Congressional Review Act), and 

12 such rule shall have no force or effect. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 305 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 37 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapTransportation Hubs’’. To Wear Masks While on Conveyances and at Prevention relating to ‘‘Requirement for Persons submitted by Centers for Disease Control and ter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

MARCH 15, 2022 

Committee discharged; by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

802(c), and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Rule 13a-14(b) Certification




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Tintic Gold Mining Company (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 20, 2012
By: /s/ Ding LiepingDing Lieping, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
S.L. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2161037

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Desmond Ross, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of QV Quantum Ventures (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter endedMarch  31, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                              



| | By:    |                                  
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        | /s/ Desmond Ross                 
| | Name:  | Desmond Ross                     
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | May 14, 2007                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
This page has been moved. If you are not redirected within 3 seconds, click here to go to DIRS homepage.
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                                      IXIA
                          EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

         Section 12(a) of the Ixia Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         "12. Stock.


                  (a) The maximum number of shares of the Company's Common Stock
         which shall be made available for sale under the Plan shall be
         1,000,000 shares, subject to adjustment upon changes in capitalization
         of the Company as provided in Section 18(a) hereof, together with a
         cumulative annual increase to the number of shares reserved for
         issuance thereunder on May 1, 2004 and each May 1 thereafter equal to
         the lesser of (i) 500,000 shares, (ii) 1% of the outstanding shares of
         the Company on the last day of the prior fiscal year or (iii) such
         amount as may be determined by the Board. The shares to be sold to
         participants in the Plan will be authorized but unissued shares. Upon
         the cancellation of any option granted under the Plan, the shares
         subject thereto shall return to the Plan and become available for
         options thereafter granted under the Plan."

Dated:  May 9, 2003
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

s0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140295

JEFFREY A. POTTS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140295 COA: 289992 Bay CC: 07-007022-DM TONI L. POTTS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 19, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
G.L.C. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160801

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 10.4
 AIRCRAFT COST SHARING AGREEMENT
 (Part 125 Operations)
   Las Vegas Sands Corp.
   Interface Operations, LLC




---



##### 



AIRCRAFT COST SHARING AGREEMENT  (Part 125 Operations)
 Aircraft Cost Sharing Agreement
  Sharing of the Aircraft
 Term
 Delivery to Recipient
 Fee
        -2-




---



##### 



Return to Base
 Use of Aircraft
     -3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



Pilots
 Operation and Maintenance Responsibilities of Provider
 Liens
 Taxes
  -5-




---



##### 



Insurance
 Loss or Damage
  -6-




---



##### 



Cape Town Treaty Compliance
   -7-




---



##### 



Representations, Warranties and Agreements of Recipient
 Authorization
 Identification
 -8-




---



##### 



Representations, Warranties and Agreements of Provider
 Authorization
 FAA Registration
 Event of Default
    Providers Remedies
    -9-




---



##### 



General Provisions
 Headings
 Partial Invalidity
 Waiver
 Notices
 To Provider at:
    
    Las Vegas Sands Corp.3355 Las Vegas Blvd. SouthLas Vegas, Nevada 89109Attn: General CounselFax: (702) 733-5088Tel.: (702) 733-5631To Recipient at:
    
    Interface Operations, LLC300 First AvenueNeedham, Massachusetts 02494Attn: Stephen J. OConnorFax: (781) 449-6616Tel. (781) 449-6500
  Massachusetts Law
 -10-




---



##### 



Entire Agreement
 Amendment
 Binding Effect; Assignment
 Attorney Fees
 Remedies Not Exclusive
 No Third Party Rights
 Counterparts
 Expenses
 Broker/Finder Fees
 -11-




---



##### 



Relationship of the Parties
 Limitation of Damages
 Survival
  PROVIDER:
    
    RECIPIENT:LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
    
    INTERFACE OPERATIONS, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Michael A. Leven
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Sheldon G. AdelsonPrint:
    
    Michael A. Leven
    
    
    
    Print:
    
    Sheldon G. AdelsonTitle:
    
    President and Chief Operating Officer
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Manager & President
  -12-




---



##### 



Schedule A
 (1)
    
    Boeing 737-300 Aircraft bearing U.S. Registration number N788LS and manufacturers serial
number 24220(2)
    
    Boeing 737-300 Aircraft bearing U.S. Registration number N789LS and manufacturers serial
Number 24269
 -13-
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Michael Coombs, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive
Officer, and CFO (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of Valley High
Mining Company (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including any consolidated subsidiary,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this Quarterly Report, the Registrant's conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls.

Dated: May 4, 2006               /s/ John Michael Coombs
                                      -------------------------------
                                      John Michael Coombs,
                                      CEO, President, CFO, and
                                      Chairman of the Board
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-21178 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE VILLALBA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-03-CR-189-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Villalba-Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Villalba-Flores contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a), his judgment must be reformed to reflect a United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-21178 -2- conviction only under that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised release.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Villalba-Flores acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: August 5, 2009 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFPERIODIC REPORT**

Theundersigned Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President andExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee Holdings Inc.(the “Company”), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of theCompany for the quarter ended June 29, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

**Dated: April 16,2007**
| /s/ PETER  C. BROWN                                                           |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Peter C. Brown  Chairman of the Board,  Chief Executive Officer and President |   |   |
| /s/ CRAIG R. RAMSEY                                                           |   |   |   |
| Craig R. Ramsey  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer        |   |   |

 

[A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MarqueeHoldings Inc. and will be retained by Marquee Holdings Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

42

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-118

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VERNON GRIMES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

Senior District Judge. (5:09-cr-00103-H-1; 5:12-cv-00466-H)

Submitted: October 30, 2013 Decided: November 7, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon Grimes, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine L. Fritz, Jennifer P. 

May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vernon Grimes seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Grimes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                             |   |                                                                          |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| November                ___,                2007 | By:    | /s/ Julianna              Lu                                             |   |
|                                             |   | Julianna              Lu                                                      |   |
|                                             |   | Chief              Executive              Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                             |   |                                                                          |   |
Frederic GABRIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2164

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2019]

Frederic Gabriel, Crawfordville, pro se.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Warner, Gross and Kuntz, JJ., concur.