alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 44 

Designating the week of January 26 through February 1, 2025, as ‘‘National 

School Choice Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2025 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. 

CRUZ, Mr. CORNYN, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. 

DAINES, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. RISCH, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. WICKER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of January 26 through February 1, 

2025, as ‘‘National School Choice Week’’. 

Whereas providing a diversity of choices in K–12 education 

empowers parents to select education environments that 

meet the individual needs and strengths of their children; 

Whereas high-quality K–12 education environments of all varieties are available in the United States, including traditional public schools, public charter schools, public magnet schools, private schools, online academies, and home 

schooling; 

Whereas talented teachers and school leaders in each of these 

education environments prepare children to achieve their 

dreams; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•SRES 44 IS 

Whereas more families than ever before in the United States 

actively choose the best education for their children; 

Whereas more public awareness of the issue of parental 

choice in education can inform additional families of the 

benefits of proactively choosing challenging, motivating, 

and effective education environments for their children; 

Whereas the process by which parents choose schools for 

their children is nonpolitical, nonpartisan, and deserves 

the utmost respect; and 

Whereas tens of thousands of events are planned to celebrate 

the benefits of educational choice during the 14th annual 

National School Choice Week, held the week of January 

26 through February 1, 2025: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of January 26 through 

3 February 1, 2025, as ‘‘National School Choice 

4 Week’’; 

5 (2) congratulates students, parents, teachers, 

6 and school leaders from kindergarten through grade 

7 12 education environments of all varieties for their 

8 persistence, achievements, dedication, and contribu9 tions to society in the United States; 

10 (3) encourages all parents, during National 

11 School Choice Week, to learn more about the edu12 cation options available to them; and 

13 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

14 to hold appropriate programs, events, and activities 

15 during National School Choice Week to raise public 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•SRES 44 IS 

1 awareness of the benefits of opportunity in edu2 cation. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 15 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 15

  Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United 
                             States Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2021

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United 
                             States Senate.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR PHOTOGRAPH.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph 1 of Rule IV of the Rules for the 
Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United States Capitol (prohibiting 
the taking of pictures in the Senate Chamber) shall be temporarily 
suspended for the sole and specific purpose of permitting an official 
photograph to be taken on January 26, 2021, of the swearing in of 
Members of the United States Senate for the impeachment trial of the 
former President of the United States.
    (b) Administration.--The acting Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of 
the Senate is authorized and directed to make the necessary 
arrangements to carry out subsection (a), which arrangements shall 
provide for a minimum of disruption to Senate proceedings.
                                 <all>
```
#### Brock DAVIDSON; Kathy Davidson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GIBSON COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-5104.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 14, 2004.

Suzanne Michelle, Blackburn & McCune, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Melinda M. Baird, Knoxville, TN, for Defendantr-Appellee.

Before: GUY, GILMAN, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kathy Davidson, on behalf of her son Brock, appeals the district court’s decision denying the Davidsons compensation for Gibson County Special School District’s alleged failure to provide Brock with a free and appropriate public education (FAPE), as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400*et seq.*

Oral argument, the parties’ briefs, and our study of both the appellate record and the applicable law, convince this court that the school district provided an educational program that met Brock’s particular needs, thereby satisfying the IDEA’S requirements. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in that court’s October 25, 2002 order.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Anthonee Patterson, :

Appellant :

: No. 1312 C.D. 2016

v. :

: Kenneth Shelton, Individually, and :

President of the Board of Trustees : of the General Assembly of the :

Church of the Lord Jesus Christ : of the Apostolic Faith, Inc. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22 day of Dec ember, 2017, upon consideration of the

emergency application of Anthonee Patterson seeking clarification of this Court’s

prior decision and order dated November 29, 2017, it appea ring that said decision

erroneously referenced the May 10, 2006 order of the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County (trial court) as confirming a previous order by an arbitrator, the

same is hereby amended to reflect that the trial court’s order conf irming the

arbitrator’s award was duly entered on July 10, 2006 , and judgment was entered in

favor of Patterson by trial court order dated July 20, 2006

. 1 Any attempts to enforce

these orders is more properly directed to the trial court following final di sposition

by this Court, including Shelton’s application for reargument.

________________________________ PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge

1 A similar order was entered by the trial court on October 12, 2006, entering judgment in

favor of Patterson. Additionally, the final adjudication and decree of the arbitrator was entered as

an order of the trial court on April 17, 2017. These orders, dated July 10 and 20, 2006, Oc tober

12, 2006, and April 17, 2017, collectively represent the last valid judgments in this case.
George Locke GALBRAITH et al. v. REGIONS BANK

1160282

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Session E-1: Advancing Federal Data 

Collections by Experimenting with

Questionnaire Design and Content, 

Interview Mode, and Contact Strategy

Darcy Miller

National Agricultural Statistics Service

FCSM 2023
THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS IN THIS PRELIMINARY 

PRESENTATION HAVE NOT BEEN FORMALLY DISSEMINATED 

BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND SHOULD 

NOT BE CONSTRUED TO REPRESENT ANY AGENCY 

DETERMINATION OR POLICY

2
Count Me In

(MacFadyen et al.)

• Cognitive interviewing ID/DD populations

• Utilized tailored cognitive interviewing

• Analyzed data as well as video interviews for 

non-verbal behaviors

• Found additional time, adaptable 

interviewers, and building relationships were 

particularly important

3
CARI Analysis of Interviewer and Respondent 

Behavior Within the CE Interview Survey

(Welsh et al.)

• Assessed interviewer and respondent 

behavior

• Interviewers frequently do not read question 

verbatim

• Found some confusion for some complex 

Consumer Expenditure items

– Both interviewer and respondent

4
Are Video Interviews for Everyone? A 

Comparison of CAVI 'Stayers' and 'Leavers’ in 

a Longitudinal Household Survey

(Arrue et al.)

• Study the use of video to increase data quality 

and potentially decrease cost

• CAVI users in longitudinal surveys

– Young, middle aged, married

– Yielded higher quality data

5
Lessons Learned Direct Care Worker Pilot 

Study

(Sengupta et al.)

• Sampling, contact strategies and recruitment

• Selected work establishments, then requested 

contact information from director

– Difficulty getting primary respondent information 

• Update strategies

– Utilize director to funnel information to either 

selected (allow them to filter) staff or all staff.

6
Prenotification Experiment in a Survey of Law 

Enforcement Agencies

(Weber et al.)

• Prenotification letter experiment in law 

enforcement establishment setting

– No response rate or speed differences

7
Wrapping It Up

• Studies to improve data 

quality

• Find ways to reach target 

population

• Minimize measurement 

error in collecting data

• Multiple methods and 

technologies to best benefit 

their populations

8

ONE-SIZE-DOES-NOT-FIT-ALL.jpg (640×300) (people-equation.com)
Thank you!

9
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/3/2015 11:05:27 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,860,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,372,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   877,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,557,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,623,000
<PP&E>                                      30,267,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,671,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             211,219,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,395,000
<BONDS>                                     96,244,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       34,322,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       814,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,088,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               211,219,000
<SALES>                                     84,452,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            84,452,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              101,942,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               661,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,370,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (23,521,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,229,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (22,292,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (6,821,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (29,113,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.38)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,071
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,378
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    127,409
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,600
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,527
<LOANS>                                        108,415
<ALLOWANCE>                                        374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 255,550
<DEPOSITS>                                     119,301
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,679
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,737
<LONG-TERM>                                    104,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 255,550
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,103
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,317
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   260
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,680
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,634
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,725
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,955
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      116
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  41
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,017
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,017
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,239
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.80
<LOANS-NON>                                        861
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   283
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       24
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  374
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               374
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Optionable,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the quarter ended March 31, 2007,  as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned
hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  to the  best of the
undersigned's knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 30, 2007                            /s/ Marc-Andre Boisseau
                                                     ----------------------
                                                        Marc-Andre Boisseau
                                                    Chief Financial Officer



  [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Optionable, Inc. and will be retained by Optionable, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Case 3:05-cv-01879-M Document 18 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 4 PageID 141
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01879-M Document 18 Filed 12/15/05 Page 2 of 4 PageID 142
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01879-M Document 18 Filed 12/15/05 Page 3 of 4 PageID 143
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01879-M Document 18 Filed 12/15/05 Page 4 of 4 PageID 144
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN MELVIN FOSTER, JR.

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 181

- C R

Appeal from the

112th District Court

of Reagan C ounty, Texas

(TC# 02013 )

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due to be f i led on December 17, 2022, with a second request

being granted until such time

. On December 19, 2022, Elizabeth Lusk, Official Court Reporter

for the 112th District Court of Reagan County, filed a third request which was denied. As of this

date, no reporter’s record has been filed. Therefore, it will be necessary for the trial court to

conduct a hearing.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether

A ppellant wishes to continue the appeal and whether Appellant has been deprived of a reporter’s

record

. The trial court shall forward it s findings to the District Clerk of Reagan County, Texas,

on or before February 7, 2023 . The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s

record containing the trial court’s findings and forward the same to this Court on or before

Februa ry 17, 2023 . Further, the trial court’s reporter shall prepare, certify, and file the record of

the trial court proceedings with this Court on or before February 17, 2023

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of January , 20 2 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Soto , JJ.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vernon Samaroo, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Southridge Enterprises Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            
|

| | By:    | /s/ Vernon Samaroo                                         
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | VERNON SAMAROO                                             
| |        |                                                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief  
      Financial Officer
| |        |                                                            
| | Date:  | July 20, 2005                                              

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
Anthony Victor LEROSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4864

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan S. Tannen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: November 10, 2009 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer