alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, David E. Trine, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ChoicePoint Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

February 28, 2008
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Financial Condition 

June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 

(unaudited) 

 June 30

2014

 December 31

2013

Assets 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 31,168,466 $ 249,284,896

 

 Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 3,468,162,750 3,060,464,938

 

 Accrued Interest Receivable 13,078,072 12,600,947

 Premiums Receivable 108,594,000 173,639,000

Other Receivables 

 

0.00

 

0.00

 

Total Assets $ 3,621,003,288 $ 3,495,989,781

 

 

Liabilities and Insurance Fund 

 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 322,727 $ 341,346

 

 Farm Credit Insurance Fund 

 

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 3,620,680,561 3,495,648,435

 

 Total Insurance Fund 3,620,680,561 3,495,648,435

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 3,621,003,288 $ 3,495,989,781
 

 

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Revenue and Expense 

For the Period Ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 

(unaudited) 

Calendar Year To Date

June 30, 2014

Calendar Year To Date

June 30, 2013

Income 

 

Premiums $ 108,474,000 $ 85,440,000

Interest Income on Investments 18,037,589 14,191,372

Total Income $ 126,511,589 $ 99,631,372

 

Expenses 

 

Administrative Operating Expenses $ 1,479,463 $ 1,690,189

Total Expenses $ 1,479,463 $ 1,690,189

 

Net Income $ 125,032,126 $ 97,941,183

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund 

For Period Ended June 30, 2014 

(unaudited) 

Balance at January 1, 2014 $ 3,495,648,435 

Net Income 125,032,126 

Balance at June 30, 2014 $ 3,620,680,561
Doris SWADER v. CHAIN STORE CONSTRUCTION, INC.

1160500

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

        Advisory Committees

Advisory Committee Calendar Home
          Advisory Committees
          Advisory Committee CalendarAdvisory Committees Advisory Committee Calendar
  	
        Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintThis page contains notices of advisory committee meetings. For previous years' advisory committee calendars, see the FDA Archive.
Search
      Some table information

Start Date
        End Date
        Meeting
        Contributing Office
        Center

                                                                                  Topic(s)
			  Research
				    				       				    				       Public Awareness
				       				    				       Training & EducationAdvisory Committee Calendar
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

                            The Board of Directors
                           V.I. Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Forms
S-8 (No. 333-62925, No. 333-62927, No. 333-58601, No. 333-87625, No. 333-87627)
of V.I. Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 2000 relating to the
balance sheets of V.I. Technologies, Inc. as of January 1, 2000 and January 2,
1999 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 1, 2000,
which report appears in the January 1, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of V.I.
Technologies, Inc.

                                 /s/  KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
March 31, 2000
Oliver S. BLAKE, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., Appellee.

No. 3D18-1776

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019.

Castle Law Group, P.A., and Alexander Allred (Largo), for appellant.

SHD Legal Group, P.A., Roy A. Diaz and Adam A. Diaz (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* *Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee*, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; *Saka v. Saka*, 831 So.2d 709, 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ("As a general rule, reviewing courts will not consider points raised for the first time on appeal.... the appellant must present a record indicating that an adequate and timely objection was interposed in the proceedings below challenging the action sought to be reviewed on appeal."); *Smith Original Homes, Inc. v. Carpet King Carpets, Inc.*, 896 So.2d 844, 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ("Deliberate and contumacious disregard of the court's authority justifies application of the severe sanction of striking pleadings or entering default for noncompliance with a discovery order, as will bad faith, willful disregard or gross indifference to the court's order, or conduct which evinces deliberate callousness."); *Paranzino v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A.,* 690 So.2d 725 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD TUSCANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ELENA VILLALOBOS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-07373-JD 

ORDER OF REMAND

Pursuant to the Court’s order dated January 30, 2017 (Dkt. No. 10), the case is ordered 

remanded to the Monterey County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 31, 2017

JAMES DONATO

United States District Judge

Case 3:16-cv-07373-JD Document 13 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ALLEN KEITH WEBB §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:05cv792

J. WILLIAMS, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER

Plaintiff Allen Keith Webb, an inmate previously confined at the Robertson Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against employees of the Robertson Unit.

Discussion

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not

contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28

U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972); aff’d per curiam, 480 F.2d 805 (5th

Cir. 1973).

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in

which the claim arose. However, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and

witnesses and in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other

district or division where it could have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and

is reviewable only for an abuse of discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th

Cir. 1989).

Case 1:05-cv-00792-MAC-KFG Document 5 Filed 12/12/2005 Page 1 of 2
 

 Case 1:06-cv-00006-BI Document 5 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 31
2

Plaintiff complains of incidents that took place at the Robertson Unit. The Robertson Unit

is located in the Abilene Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of

Texas. The court has considered the circumstances and has determined that the interest of justice

would best be served if the complaint were transferred to the district in which the claims arose and

where the defendants reside. Therefore, the case should be transferred to the Northern District of

Texas. An order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

SIGNED this day of , 2005.

 

 KEITH F. GIBLIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 1:05-cv-00792-MAC-KFG Document 5 Filed 12/12/2005 Page 2 of 2
 

 Case 1:06-cv-00006-BI Document 5 Filed 12/12/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 32
Case 4:05-cv-00021-A Document 56 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 333
1

Case No. 17-CV-00062-LHK 

JUDGMENT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RODERICK MAGADIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. and 

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00062-LHK 

JUDGMENT

On May 31, 2019, the Court issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. ECF No. 

217. The Clerk shall enter judgment. Defendants Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, 

Inc. shall pay $48,046,000 in Cal. Lab. Code § 226(e) statutory damages, and $53,901,700 in 

California Private Attorneys General Act penalties. The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 31, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00062-LHK Document 218 Filed 05/31/19 Page 1 of 1
William COON, DOC #H04539, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2568

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Daniel RESLIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-1038

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GABLES REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


                               Jurisdiction of   Other Names Under Which
Subsidiary                      Organization     Subsidiary Does Business
----------                      ------------     ------------------------


Central Apartment Management,      Texas        Gables Residential Services and
Inc.                                            Gables Corporate Accommodations

East Apartment Management, Inc.    Georgia      Gables Residential Services and
                                                Gables Corporate Accommodations

Gables-Tennessee Properties        Tennessee    None

Gables Central  Construction, Inc. Texas        None

Gables East Construction, Inc.     Georgia      None

Candlewood-Indian Creek Limited    Georgia      None
     Partnership

Pin Oak Green                      Texas        None

Pin Oak Park Apartments            Texas        None

GRT Villas Limited Partnership     Texas        None
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**













In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal,
      President, Chief Executive Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of
      Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.








*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Executive Officer






October
      17, 2005











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**













In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal, Chief
      Financial Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.








*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Financial Officer






October
      17, 2005
III 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 51 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States Agency for International Development is essential for advancing the national security 

interests of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. COONS (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. BENNET, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. 

BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. BOOKER, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. 

DUCKWORTH, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. GALLEGO, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Mr. 

KELLY, Mr. KIM, Mr. KING, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. MARKEY, 

Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. PETERS, 

Mr. REED, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. 

SCHUMER, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. SLOTKIN, Ms. SMITH, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, 

Mr. WARNER, Mr. WARNOCK, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. 

WYDEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States 

Agency for International Development is essential for 

advancing the national security interests of the United 

States. 

Whereas the United States Agency for International Development (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘USAID’’) was created in 1961 by Executive Order 10973 (26 Fed. Reg. 

10469; relating to the administration of foreign assistance and related functions), based on authority provided 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 51 IS 

in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 

et seq.); 

Whereas USAID was subsequently established as an independent agency by the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (division G of Public Law 105– 

277; 112 Stat. 2681–761); and 

Whereas the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 

(Public Law 118–47) explicitly requires both congressional consultation and notification to Congress for any 

reorganizations, consolidations, or downsizing of USAID: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate affirms the centrality of 

2 the United States Agency for International Development 

3 in advancing the national security interests of the United 

4 States by— 

5 (1) mitigating threats abroad before such 

6 threats reach the shores of the United States; 

7 (2) promoting global stability; 

8 (3) addressing the root causes of migration and 

9 extremism; and 

10 (4) securing the leadership and influence of the 

11 United States in an era of strategic competition with 

12 the People’s Republic of China. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Rodney FENELUS, DOC# M40394, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2980

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward C. Dillon,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Edward C. Dillon
--------------------
Edward C. Dillon,
Chief Executive Officer
August 1, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Marie Tuesday ESSA, Appellant, v. Michael GURRIERI, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3677

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cheryl C. MCSHAN v. Kenneth Wayne CHATMAN

2170337

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 29, 2018

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20

- 0609

Pursuant to Appellants’ Motion and to Montana Rule of Appellate Procedure

26(1) , Appellants are granted a thirty

- day extension to file their opening brief.

Appellants’ opening brief shall be due on or before March 31, 2021

.

DATED

___________________ , 20 2 1

.

By :

____________________________________ BOWEN GREENWOOD

Clerk of Montana Supreme Curt ARIANE WITTMAN and JEREMY

TAYLEN,

A ppellants

,

- vs

CITY OF BILLINGS,

A ppellee

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) ORDER GRANTING

APPELLANTS’ MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

OPENING BRIEF

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 4 2021

02/04/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0609