alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 221/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 221 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6622 June 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 221

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6622 June 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2023/C 221/01 | Plenary Meeting of the LXIX COSAC – Stockholm 14 – 16 May 2023 – Contribution of the LXIX COSAC | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2023/C 221/01

Plenary Meeting of the LXIX COSAC – Stockholm 14 – 16 May 2023 – Contribution of the LXIX COSAC

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-93713) and the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-40039, 333-40033, and 333-40035) of Pegasus Solutions, Inc.
of our report dated February 6, 2001, except as to Note 19, which is as of March
7, 2001,  relating to the financial statements and our report dated February 6,
2001 related to the financial statement schedule, which appear in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Selected Financial Data" in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 22, 2001
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Kreig, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Thomas Kreig




Principal Accounting Officer


August 13, 2009
# C_2017022EN.01004101.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/41

---

Action brought on 14 November 2016 — N & C Franchise v EUIPO — Eschenbach Optik (ojo sunglasses)

(Case T-792/16)

(2017/C 022/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: N & C Franchise Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Chrysanthis, P.-V. Chardalia and A. Vasilogamvrou, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eschenbach Optik GmbH (Nürnberg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ojo sunglasses’ – EU trade mark No 13 224 761

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 September 2016 in Case R 32/2016-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs and legal fees of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs and legal fees of the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0696

__________________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF D.A., L.A., and F.A.,

Youths in Need of Care.

_________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s Mother’s motion for extension of 

time, without objection, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant Mother is granted an 

extension of time to and including April 14, 2023, within which to 

prepare, file, and serve her opening brief on appeal.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 31 2023

03/31/2023
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of LHC Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Keith G. Myers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter J. Roman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2011



/s/ Keith G. MyersKeith G. MyersChief Executive Officer(Principal executive officer)




/s/ Peter J. RomanPeter J. RomanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial officer)
Revised 9/28/2022

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

JANE HINCKLEY HALPRIN, Administrative Law Judge

JOHN B. ADAMS, Special Counsel

MONIQUE GRAY, Administrative Management Specialist
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 17, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-364

Lower Tribunal No. F92-19854

________________

Antonio Johnson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge.

Antonio Johnson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Daniel J. MARTIN

(In re: State v. Daniel Jesus Martin)

2170324

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 3, 2018

Mand. pet. denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 18, 2011

t0511

Order 

May 18, 2011

140679

LAURENCE G. WOLF, d/b/a

LAURENCE WOLF PROPERTIES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140679

COA: 279853

CITY OF DETROIT,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral 

arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we VACATE the January 

21, 2010 opinion and order of the Court of Appeals. At this time, a material question of

fact exists concerning the direct and indirect costs of the services for which the solid 

waste inspection fee is charged. Such a finding is necessary to determine whether the 

City of Detroit’s solid waste inspection fee is proportionate to the necessary costs of the 

inspection service, and may also impact whether the fee serves a revenue-raising or a 

regulatory purpose. See Bolt v City of Lansing, 459 Mich 152, 161-162 (1998). 

Accordingly, summary disposition in favor of the defendant was improper. We therefore 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals. Because substantial fact-finding may be 

necessary, the Court of Appeals should consider a further remand to the circuit court for 

this purpose. See MCL 600.308a(5). 

MARILYN KELLY, J. (concurring in part, dissenting in part).

I concur in the Court’s order vacating the January 21, 2010 opinion and order of 

the Court of Appeals. However, I dissent from the Court’s decision to remand this case 

to the Court of Appeals. I would instead remand the case to the Wayne Circuit Court for 

further findings of fact because trial courts are better equipped to make such findings. I 

would also retain jurisdiction over the case so that the Supreme Court can rule on its 

merits once the trial court makes its findings of fact.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartMetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Colin
Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
    the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/
      Colin HendrickColin
      Hendrick, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
  OfficerSmartMetric,
      Inc.May
      27, 2005
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of California 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CORDIS CORPORATION, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No.17-cv-00022-EMC 

ORDER REMANDING CASE 

 

For the reasons stated in this Court’s September 23, 2016, Order in Dunson v. Cordis, 

C16-3076-EMC, Docket No. 53, the Court hereby REMANDS this case to state court for lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 7, 2017 

______________________________________ 

EDWARD M. CHEN 

United States District Judge 

 

Case 3:17-cv-00022-EMC Document 14 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 1
Peter M. BLAKELEY and Amy Blakeley, Appellants, v. Michael T. LIVORSI, individually and as Trustee of the Michael T. Livorsi and Nelda J. Livorsi Revocable Living Trust Dated 05/24/99; Michael Livorsi, individually and as Trustee of the Michael Livorsi Revocable Living Trust Dated 04/22/03; Jim Agles; and Realty Team of Lee County, Inc., a Florida corporation d/b/a RE/MAX Realty Team, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-3782 2D17-4165

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019

P. Brandon Perkins of Rogers Towers, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellants.

Theodore L. Tripp, Jr., and Joel W. Hyatt of Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, Fort Myers, for Appellee Jim Agles.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

KELLY, Judge.

Peter and Amy Blakeley challenge the final summary judgment entered in favor of Jim Agles, the real estate agent and property manager who represented the seller in a real estate transaction with the Blakeleys.1 Because genuine issues of material fact remain in dispute with regard to whether Mr. Agles had knowledge of material defects in the home at the time of the sale and breached his duty to disclose them to the Blakeleys, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

We review an order granting final summary judgment de novo. *See**Volusia Cty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P.*, 760 So. 2d 126, 130 (Fla. 2000). If the evidence raises the slightest doubt on any issue of material fact, if it is conflicting, or if it will permit different reasonable inferences, summary judgment is improper. *Grimes v. Lottes*, 241 So. 3d 892, 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018). Summary judgment should only be granted "where the facts are 'so crystalized' that nothing remains but questions of law." *Ventana Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Chancey Design P'ship, Inc.*, 203 So. 3d 175, 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (quoting *McCabe v. Fla. Power & Light Co.*, 68 So. 3d 995, 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ). Because the facts of this case are not "so crystallized" such that nothing remains but questions of law, we *674reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

LaROSE, C.J. and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

1

Case number 2D17-4165 is an appeal from the final summary judgment granted as to count V of the Blakeleys' second-amended complaint and from the order denying the Blakeleys' motion for rehearing. Case number 2D17-3782 is a separately-filed appeal from the Blakeleys' Amended Motion to Vacate Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. We consolidate these appeals for purposes of this opinion.
# C_2017424EN.01002101.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 12 September 2017 — Claudia Wegener v Royal Air Maroc SA

(Case C-537/17)

(2017/C 424/31)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Claudia Wegener

Applicant:

Defendant: Royal Air Maroc SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is there a flight, for the purposes of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, in the case where an air carrier’s air transport operation includes scheduled interruptions (stopovers) outside the territory of the European [Union] with a change of aircraft?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Steven D. Moulton, principal accounting officer of the Jump'n Jax, Inc.
(the "registrant"), certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Jump'n Jax,
Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of our financial reporting internal controls which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date:   November 2, 2005


/s/   STEVEN D. MOULTON
----------------------------
Steven D. Moulton
Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 31

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31
                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Tom Djokovich, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of XsunX, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 18, 2005


/s/ Tom Djokovich
-----------------------
Tom Djokovich,
President, Acting CFO, & Director
Michael MCKINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1892

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 28, 2019

Paula C. Coffman, Orlando, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.