alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endingDecember 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas R. Staab, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 15,2010
EX PARTE Terry Lee HEISER

1161179 (CR-15-1386)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
Case 3:05-cv-02511-M Document 15 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 46
# C_2017112EN.01001901.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2017 — Vincent Pierre Oberle

(Case C-20/17)

(2017/C 112/27)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Kammergericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vincent Pierre Oberle

Applicant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession (1) (Regulation No 650/2012) to be interpreted as meaning that it also determines exclusive international jurisdiction in respect of the granting, in the Member States, of national certificates of succession which have not been replaced by the European certificate of succession (see Article 62(3) of Regulation No 650/2012), with the result that divergent provisions adopted by national legislatures with regard to international jurisdiction in respect of the granting of national certificates of succession — such as Paragraph 105 of the Familiengesetzbuch (the Family Code) in Germany — are ineffective on the ground that they infringe higher-ranking European law?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 201, p. 107.

1

---
Order – Solo Page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

CARLOS J. ACUNA, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-2109-L

§

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

This is a habeas case brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and

an order of the court in implementation thereof, this action was referred to the United States

magistrate judge for proposed findings and recommendation. On December 5, 2006, the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed. Petitioner filed

his Objections on December 18, 2006.

After making an independent review of the pleadings, file and record in this case, the

findings of the magistrate judge, and the Petitioner’s objections, the court determines that the

findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct. They are therefore accepted as those

of the court. Accordingly, the court denies Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and

dismisses this action with prejudice. 

It is so ordered this 8th day of January, 2007.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02109-L Document 21 Filed 01/08/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 152
Cortez SMALLS, DOC #R66317, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-824

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

Cortez Smalls, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
R.L. v. MADISON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160902

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 16, 2018

Affirmed.
Paul NIXON, Appellant, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
D.B. v. L.S.

2170233

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 4, 2018

Dismissed.
Auction Expenditure 

Justification Report

Fiscal Year 2019
i

Cumulative Cash Receipts

(FYs 1994 - 2019)

$117.4 Billion 

FY 2019 Expenditures

$122.2 Million

0.10% 

Cumulative 

Expenditures 

(FYs 1994 - 2018)

$1.810 Billion 

1.54% 

Cash Receipts is the total net winning bids collected for broader government use. Over a 26-year period, the average cash receipts per year is $4.5 Billion.

Cumulative Expenditures (FYs 1994 - 2018) does not include administrative cost of the Spectrum Credit Reform Program.
Compensation: (1100 – 1300 Budget Object Class Code (BOCC) Series)

1) Personnel Compensation

2) Personnel Benefits

3) Benefits for Former Personnel

Travel & Transportation of Persons: (2100 BOCC Series)

1) Domestic Travel

2) Foreign Travel

3) Leased Passenger Vehicles

Transportation of Things: (2200 BOCC Series)

1) Parcel Post

2) Non-Passenger GSA & Commercial Truck

Rent, Communications, Utilities, and Mail: (2300 BOCC Series)

1) GSA Space Rent

2) Non-GSA Space Rent

3) Non-GSA Telephone/Fax

4) GSA Telephones

5) Mail Services – Postage

6) Gas/Electric/Other Utilities

7) Messenger Services

8) Other Equipment Rental

9) Copier Rental

Printing and Reproduction: (2400 BOCC Series)

1) Printing/Reproduction

2) Printing/Binding/Federal Register

Other Contractual Services: (2500 BOCC Series)

1) Contracts Services – Non Federal

2) ADP* Retrieval Service

3) Training/Tuition/Fees

4) Security Investigations – Federal

5) Interagency Contracts

6) Space Repair/Interior/Exterior

7) ADP* Software Maintenance

8) ADP* Equipment Maintenance

9) Repair Office Equipment/Furniture

10) ADP* Service Contracts

Supplies and Materials: (2600 BOCC Series)

1) Supplies & Materials

2) Periodicals & Subscriptions

Equipment: (3100 BOCC Series)

1) Technical Equipment

2) ADP* Equipment

3) ADP* Software

4) Office Furniture/Equipment

5) Telecommunications Equipment

6) Books

ii *Automated Data Processing
iii

Budget 

Object 

Class Code Expenditures

11 Personnel Compensation $27,329,746

12 Personnel Benefits 8,258,111

13 Benefits for Former Personnel 8,400

21 Travel and Transportation of Persons 229,387

22 Transportation of Things 11,340

23 Rents, Communications, Utilities, and Mail 8,138,880

24 Printing and Reproduction 174,000

25 Other Contractual Services 73,198,703

26 Supplies and Materials 3,833,748

31 Equipment 1,006,303

TOTAL 1 $122,188,619

Budget Object Class Code Description

SPECTRUM AUCTIONS PROGRAM EXPENDITURES REPORT

1

Does not include obligations for Spectrum Credit Reform Program Administrative Costs to support loan activities. These activities are funded from the 

General Fund of Treasury as provided in the Credit Reform Act. 

Fiscal Year 2019
JOHN MORIARTY & ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellant, v. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1238

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019.

Agnant & Lambdin LLC, and Linda Dickhaus Agnant and Keith J. Lambdin (Plantation), for appellant.

Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman, & Hermann, P.A., and Richard P. Hermann, II, and Robin I. Frank, and Jennifer Shafer (Boca Raton), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, J.

*465In the absence of a transcript of the lower court proceedings, and finding no legal error apparent on the face of the order enforcing the settlement agreement, we cannot conclude the trial court erred in rendering the order under review and therefore affirm. *See**Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee*, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal."); *see**also**Hamilton v. Florida Power & Light Co.*, 48 So.3d 170, 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ("When there is a nonjury finding on disputed evidence [in an order enforcing settlement], it is reviewed on appeal for competent, substantial evidence because the lower court 'is in the best position to evaluate and weigh the testimony and evidence.' ") (quoting *Acoustic Innovations, Inc. v. Schafer*, 976 So.2d 1139, 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ).

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7202-7203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01519]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 23, 2025.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

[[Page 7203]]

    Dated: January 16, 2025.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01519 Filed 1-16-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
### Appeal Case #01-15-00207-CV Joe Payton Lee, Appellant FILEDM fSTCOURTOFAPPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS MAR 2 3 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE 

# VptZ CLERK

First Court ofAppeals Rita Lemons, Appellee 

## Motion Requesting Docketing Statement and Extension to File It Comes now, Joe Payton Lee, pro se litigant and herein referred to as appellant, respectfully requesting a docket statement 

## pursuantto Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedures 42.3. Appellant does not own a computer, and thereby requests that the clerk 

# please mail oneto 3633 DuBois and givehimtimeto file out andmail back. Appellant asks that he not be penalized.

# >W~ 

# Jcaji^ KV \

### M /// * • as the appellant's defense in the trial that was heard on February 6, 2015. Respectfully submitted, Joe Payton Lee Certificate of Service: A true and correct copy ofthis motion was sent to the following interested parties pursuant to Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedures 9.5 (d), (e): Rita Lemons 16215 Diamond Ridge Houston, Texas 77053 Mae Walker, Constable 5290 Griggs Road Houston, Texas 77021 Attn: J. Milan-7C21 Steve Smith, Harris County Attorney 15th Floor 1019 Congress Houston, Texas 77002 

## Ur, 

## /&&*
Whitney Phillips BROOKS v. Lloyd Michael BROOKS II

2160565

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 2, 2018

Affirmed.
SCPW-21-0000510
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

MARCUS PONO LAKE, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, Judge of the Circuit Court of the

First Circuit, State of Hawai # i, Respondent Judge,
and
U .S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the registered holder of Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan T rust 2004-HE7 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE7; VIOLA INNOCENCIA FAO; LANIKUHANA PATIO HOMES; 1326 KEEAUMOKU LLC; MILILANI TOWN ASSOCIATION; STEPHEN W. FISHER, individually and as Trustee for the Stephen W. Fischer Revocable Trust; REALTY PROFESSIONALS LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company; and JRS HUI, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Civil No. 1CC151001975)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Marcus Lake’s petition for writ of mandamus, and the record, on September 28, 2021, the circuit court entered an “Order Denying ‘Defendant, Crossclaim Plaintiff, and Third-Party Plaintiff Marcus Pono Lake’s Motion for Summary Judgment’ Filed on March 14, 2019,” thereby ruling on Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-21-0000510 12-OCT-2021 10:59 AM Dkt. 6 ODDPpetitioner’s motion for summary judgment, which is the subject of

the petition. The relief that petitioner seeks in the petition has been addressed by the circuit court’s order and, thus, the requested extraordinary writ is not necessary. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 12, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
----

|                                                                                                              |   | /s/  Thomas A. Vento                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                              |   | Name: Thomas A. Vento                                       |
|                                                                                                              |   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                                                                                                              |   |                                                        |
|              Date:   May 16, 2011 |   |                                                        |
|                                                                                                              |   |                                                        |
|                                                                                                              |   | /s/ Joseph R. Corrato                                       |
|                                                                                                              |   | Name: Joseph R. Corrato                                     |
|                                                                                                              |   | Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                                                                              |   |                                                        |
|              Date:   May 16, 2011 |   |                                                        |
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Swinging Pig Productions, Inc. a Florida
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Daniel Mirman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Swinging Pig Productions, Inc., and will be retained by Swinging Pig
Productions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
 
 /s/
      Daniel MirmanDaniel
      Mirman
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                December
      16, 2009
Letter of consent Bank of America N.A. dated June 6, 2003



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 FAX TRANSMISSION 
 ORIGINAL SENT BY U.S. MAIL

  
 Bank of America 
 Commercial Agency Management 
 WA1-501-37-20 
 800 Fifth Avenue, Floor 37 
 Seattle, WA 98104-3185 
  
 Tel 206.358.0101 
 Fax 206.358.0971 
  
 June 6, 2003 
  
 David Loftus 
 Treasurer 
 FLIR Systems, Inc. 
 16505 SW 72nd Avenue 
 Portland OR 97224 
 FAX: 503-4995-1715 
  

	RE:	 	FLIR Systems, Inc. 

 Credit Agreement dated as of March 22,
2003 
  
 Dear Dave: 
  
 Bank of America, as Agent is pleased to inform you that all Lenders have consented to the sale of up to $210 million of Senior Convertible
Notes as of June 5, 2003. 
  
 Please call if I can be of further assistance.

  
 Sincerely, 
  
 Bank of America, as Agent 
  
 /s/ DORA BROWN 
 Dora Brown 
 VP/Senior Agency Officer 
  

	 cc:
	  	Eric Eidler, Bank of America	  	FAX: 503-275-1391
	 	  	Kevin McBride, KeyBank	  	FAX: 415-733-2480
	 	  	Scott Mahoney, KeyBank	  	FAX: 425-709-4565
	 	  	Tom Marks, Union Bank of CA	  	FAX: 503-225-2846
Kenton G. FINDLAY, Appellant, v. STAR LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC., (A Condominium Association), Appellee.

No. 3D18-0294

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Teresa GAFFNEY, Individually; and Sarah K. Sussman, Individually and as Trustee of the Sussman Family Trust Living Trust, u/a/d January 19, 2012, Appellants, v. Phillip A. BAUMANN, Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of John J. Gaffney, Deceased, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4238

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019.

Sarah C. Pellenbarg and Ceci Culpepper Berman, of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, for Appellants.

Michael R. Kangas, BaumannKangas Estate Law, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KELLY, J., and LENDERMAN, JOHN C., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.
Exhibit 43

To Declaration of Jarad Brown in Support of 

Federal Trade Commission’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 178-45 Filed 09/21/18 Page 1 of 3
DIR-645 Revision A Release Notes 

Firmware 1.04 

Date: 06/11/2013 

Bug-Fixes Addressed 

Fix bug streaming multicast data in LAN affect WLAN can?t access network. 

Fix Banner on web configuration does not display or scale + or - with Firefox and 

Safari 

Add router_ info.xml for DCC can detect WAN link status(DCC bug,Fw workaround) 

Fix DHCP client renew fail when using broadcast flag 

GUI date/time extend to 203 7 

Fix Login password limit to 15 char same as password setting in admin page. 

Fix iTunes server cause out of memory when parsing some error mp3 file. 

Fix the problem that wifi-enhance not working 

Reduce the logout timeout from ten to three minutes for D-Link: request due to 

security consideration. 

Fix reset statistic fail. 

Fix signal of wifi client always show 100% 

Enable 3TB hdd support 

Fix the ping for 1Pv6 ";reboot" will cause system reboot.we need do shell command 

escape before execute. 

Vulnerabilities Addressed 

Fix Admin Password will accepting and saving complex password, then not allow the 

user to use new complex password 

Fix Web file access api getfile path could not include . ./ 

Fix bypass authentication before scan direction in the router. (_ajax_explorer.sgi) 

Fix curl -H "Cookie: uid=9gldu6X6nF" -d "EVENT=%26%20telnetd%26" 

http:l/192.168.0.1/service.cgi would cause script injection issue to execute telentd. 

Fix bypass authentication on version.php show too much router information 

Fix widget functions and remove the relative files like router_info.xml from 

tmauthorized access 

Fix issue that disables telnetd after the router is not longer factory default 

Fix unauthorized post execute commands in the router by comrnand.php 

Pix Vulnerabilities Discovered and Disclosure by Roberto Paleari 

<"roberto@greyhats.it"> 

Fix Buffer overflow on "post_login.xml" 

Fix Buffer overflow on "hedwig.cgi" 

Fix Buffer overflow on "authentication.cgi" 

Fix (CSRF) Cross-site scripting on "bind.php" 

Fix (CSRF) Cross-site scripting on "info.php" 

Fix (CSRF) Cross-site scripting on "bsc_sms_send.php" 

Official Disclosure @ http://bit.ly/l9BZZZH 

Firmware 1.03 

Date: 11/21/2012 

SharePort Mobile / Web access Support 

Enhanced iOS6 compatibility 

Enhanced IPv6 

DLS0008837

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 178-45 Filed 09/21/18 Page 2 of 3
Firmware l.02 

Date: 07/12/2012 

Boxee improvement 

Disable WPS-PIN Method 

Firmware l.01 

Date: 09/26/2011 

Revision Info: 

Fix wrong WAN port position picture in wizard setup. 

Fix syslog function. 

Fix DCS-5220 IPCAM WP A/WP A2 IOT issue. 

DLS0008838

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 178-45 Filed 09/21/18 Page 3 of 3