alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHBIBIT 21.1


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Maysville Marketsquare Associates, L.P.
North Coast Health Center (JV Partnership)
Oregon Food Stores, Inc.
Oregon Real Estate Services, Inc.
OP Walnut Creek, LLC
Pan Pacific (Cable Park), LLC
Pan Pacific (Clackamas), Inc.
Pan Pacific (Kienow's), L.P.
Pan Pacific (Clackamas), LLC
Pan Pacific (Marina Village), LLC
Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC
Pan Pacific (Pinecreek), L.P.
Pan Pacific (Rancho Las Palmas), LLC
Pan Pacific (RLP), Inc.
Pan Pacific (Sunset Mall), LLC
Pan Pacific Development (Chino), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Kentucky), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (New Mexico), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Olympia Square), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Rosewood), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee) Acquisition, Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee), L.P.
Pan Pacific U.S. Shopping Center I, LP
Sahara Pavilion North U.S., Inc.
K.B. v. L.B.

2160886

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 30, 2018

Affirmed.
# C_2018182EN.01002201.xml

| 28.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/22

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 March 2018 — Hércules Club de Fútbol v Commission

(Case T-766/16 R)

((Interim proceedings - State aid - Aid granted by Spain in favour of certain professional football clubs - Public guarantee granted by a public body - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Application for a stay of proceedings - Lack of urgency))

(2018/C 182/25)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: S. Rating and Y. Martínez Mata, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Gavela Llopis, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking a stay of execution of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/365 of 4 July 2016 on the State aid SA.36387 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (ex 2013/CP) granted by Spain to Valencia Club de Fútbol, Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD and Elche Club de Fútbol, SAD (OJ 2017 L 55, p. 12).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The order of 11 November 2016, Hércules Club de Fútbol v Commission (T-766/16 R), is set aside. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The order of 11 November 2016, Hércules Club de Fútbol v Commission (T-766/16 R), is set aside.

| 3. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The costs are reserved.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                              101,148
<SECURITIES>                                      1,144,136
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,839,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                        145,204
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,632,143
<PP&E>                                              680,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                      365,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8,595,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,751,054
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             34,680
<OTHER-SE>                                        6,588,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8,595,214
<SALES>                                           7,544,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7,544,989
<CGS>                                             4,907,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9,792,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,161,843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (677,987)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,483,856)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,483,856)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.43)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 55 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 55

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
      United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Council on 
 Environmental Quality relating to ``National Environmental Policy Act 
                 Implementing Regulations Revisions''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Council on Environmental Quality relating to 
``National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations 
Revisions'' (87 Fed. Reg. 23453 (April 20, 2022)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate August 4, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 55

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
      United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Council on 
 Environmental Quality relating to ``National Environmental Policy Act 
                 Implementing Regulations Revisions''.
```
# C_2017112EN.01002101.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 23 January 2017 — Sucrerie de Toury SA v Ministre de l’économie et des finances

(Case C-31/17)

(2017/C 112/30)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Sucrerie de Toury SA

Appellant on a point of law:

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Ministre de l’économie et des finances

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law:

Question referred

Question referred

Do energy products used for combined heat and electricity generation come exclusively within the scope of the optional power to exempt conferred by Article 15(1)(c) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 (1) or do they also come, as regards the proportion of those products the consumption of which corresponds to the generation of electricity, within the scope of the obligation to exempt provided for by Article 14(1)(a) of that directive?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51).

1

---
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nelson Stark,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Nelson Stark
-----------------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1313

In re: MICHAEL RANKINS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:14-cr-00003-FL-1; 2:20-cv-00017-FL)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Rankins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Rankins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court 

has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in 

the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Smartmetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Colin
Hendrick





Colin
Hendrick


President
(Principal Executive Officer)


May 20,
2008






/s/ Jay
Needleman


Jay
Needleman


Chief
Financial Officer


May 20,
2008
D.R. v. MORGAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2170010

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 2018

Affirmed.
IN RE: APPEAL OF the Decision of the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 17-PDB-043

NO. 2017-OB-1810

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Reconsideration denied.
Michael BYNOE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-265

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Michael D. YonkerMichael D. YonkerVice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and SecretaryDate:
    
    March 12, 2007
Ana Maria OLIN, et al., Appellants, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D19-0256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

Ana Maria Olin and Robert A. Del Castillo, in proper persons.

Fox McCluskey Bush Robison, PLLC, and Adam G. Schwartz (Stuart), for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.

LINDSEY, J.

Appellee, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, D/B/A Christiana Trust, as Trustee for the Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust (Wilmington), seeks dismissal of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because appellants, Ana Maria Olin and Robert A. Del Castillo a/k/a Robert Anthony Del Castillo, filed their notice of appeal beyond thirty days from the date of rendition of the order on appeal, we grant Wilmington's motion and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

This cases involves an appeal of an order rescheduling a foreclosure sale. The order was rendered December 18, 2018. Ms. Olin and Mr. Del Castillo filed their notice of appeal on February 8, 2019 - 53 days later. *Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b)* provides that an appellant shall file a notice with the clerk of the lower tribunal within thirty days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. Thus, Ms. Olin and Mr. Del Castillo were required to file their notice of appeal on or before January 17, 2019, in order to timely invoke this Court's jurisdiction.

Florida courts of appeal have routinely granted motions to dismiss following the untimely filing of a notice of appeal because the court does not have jurisdiction to hear the case. *See**Bryant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A*., 182 So.3d 927, 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (citing *Mekertin v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc*., 869 So.2d 1286, 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ("The time for taking an appeal is a jurisdictional requirement established by *Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b)*. Where the notice of appeal is not filed within thirty days of rendition, the appellate court is precluded from exercising jurisdiction over the appeal." (quoting *Am. Auto. Ass'n v. C.D.S. Towing & Recovery, Inc*., 805 So.2d 1064, 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ) ); *Chandler v. BAC Home Loans Servicing*, 101 So.3d 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ) (dismissing appeal for untimely notice of appeal). Failure to timely invoke this Court's jurisdiction requires dismissal.

Dismissed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eduard
      Jeager, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Eduard Jeager





Eduard
      Jeager


Chief
      Executive Officer


August
      14, 2008
Akeem FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1856

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of XsunX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date himself (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:     January
12, 2010





/s/ 
      Joe GrimesName:
      Joe GrimesTitles:
      President, Chief Operating Officer, and
Director





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. KEVIN J. MCCLINTOCK, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 199 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 26th day of August, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Alphanso E. HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3847

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board

          - [Agency Docket Number: CRCCRRB-2025-0007-N]

# AGENCY:

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 632 pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) related to eight civil rights cold case incidents to which the Review Board assigned the unique identifiers 2024-003-009, 2024-003-015, 2024-003-024, 2024-003-030, 2024-003-033, 2024-003-034, 2024-003-043, and 2024-003-058. NARA did not propose any postponements of disclosure. On January 10 and 17, 2025, the Review Board determined that the records should be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with section 7(c)(4) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that requires the Review Board to publish in the                         **Federal Register**                         its determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stephannie Oriabure, Chief of Staff, Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, (771) 221-0014,                         *info@coldcaserecords.gov.*

*Authority:*Pub. L. 115-426, 132 Stat. 5489 (44 U.S.C. 2107).                    

Dated: January 21, 2025.

Stephannie Oriabure,

Chief of Staff.

[FR Doc. 2025-01696 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-SY-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-73035) pertaining to the 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan, 1997
Restaurant Management Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock Option Plan and 1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-
98665) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Nonstatutory Stock
Option Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-56618) of P.F.
Chang's China Bistro, Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 29, 2002,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
February 11, 2003
Case 3:05-cv-01344-M Document 17 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 7 PageID 326
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01344-M Document 17 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 7 PageID 327
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01344-M Document 17 Filed 01/11/06 Page 3 of 7 PageID 328
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01344-M Document 17 Filed 01/11/06 Page 4 of 7 PageID 329
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01344-M Document 17 Filed 01/11/06 Page 5 of 7 PageID 330
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01344-M Document 17 Filed 01/11/06 Page 6 of 7 PageID 331
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01344-M Document 17 Filed 01/11/06 Page 7 of 7 PageID 332
Case 2:05-cv-00246-J Document 12 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 79
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00246-J Document 12 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 80
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 13 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 13

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment 
      Opportunity Commission relating to ``Update of Commission's 
                       Conciliation Procedures''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2021

 Mrs. Murray introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
 twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment 
      Opportunity Commission relating to ``Update of Commission's 
                       Conciliation Procedures''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating 
to ``Update of Commission's Conciliation Procedures'' (86 Fed. Reg. 
2974; published January 14, 2021), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```