alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 4 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of not more 

than 9 justices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. CRAMER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. 

ROMNEY, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. TOOMEY, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require that the Supreme Court of the United 

States be composed of not more than 9 justices. 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 4 IS 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 by the Congress: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Supreme Court of the United 

5 States shall be composed of not more than 9 justices. 

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to 

7 enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Case 3:17-cr-00021-WHO Document 9 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:05-cv-00943-B Document 6 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 37
STATE of Louisiana v. Eugene Thomas Morris J. PATIN

NO. 2015-K-1191

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 2019

Not considered. See La.S.Ct.R. IX, § 6.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 63 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 
                                 2020.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, pursuant to section 202 
of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national 
emergency declared by the finding of the President on March 13, 2020, 
in Proclamation 9994 (85 Fed. Reg. 15337) is hereby terminated.

            Passed the Senate November 15, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 
                                 2020.
```
### NUMBER 13

- 15

- 00103

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

CHARLES WAYNE COOPER

, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On Appeal from the 3 6th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's pro se motion for access to the

appellate record. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has

been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief. See Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 , 744 (1967)

. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion and it2

is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully

examine the appe llate record on or before the expiration of thirty days from t he date of

this order , and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the

date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v.

State , 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from

the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his pro se brief with

this Court. The State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

13th day of July, 2015

.
Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 95-3 Filed 07/09/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 95-3 Filed 07/09/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:17-cv-00152-VC Document 95-3 Filed 07/09/18 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FINJAN LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF 

ORDER SETTING CONFERENCE FOR 

DECEMBER 16, 2020 AT 2:00PM

The Court SETS a videoconference for December 16, 2020 at 2:00pm. Parties shall be 

prepared to discuss the trial schedule. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2020

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 737 Filed 12/15/20 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**Certification****Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),each of the undersigned officers of EDP — Electicidade dePortugal, S.A., a corporation organizedunder the laws of the Republic of Portugal (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officers’ knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002(the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and informationcontained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: July 3, 2003 | /s/   João Ramalho Talone |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |                                |
|                    | João Ramalho Talone            |
|                    | Chief  Executive Officer            |
|                    |                                |
|                    |                                |
| Date: July 3, 2003 | /s/   Rui Miguel Horta e Costa |   |
|                    |                                |
|                    | Rui Miguel Horta e Costa            |
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer            |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not beingfiled as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140891 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140891 

 COA: 288255 

Muskegon CC: 08-056234-FC 

MARCUS TULEKUN BOLDEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
ARCHI TRUST LLC, AS TRUSTEE FOR TRUST #102716-4426, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and Donovan Southwell a/k/a Donovan M. Southwell, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0566

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 31, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1456

JEFFREY M. MOOGALIAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., 

District Judge. (3:13-cv-00706-JAG-MHL)

Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey M. Moogalian, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy S. Lester, 

Alexander Tevis Marshall, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, 

PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey M. Moogalian appeals the district court’s 

dismissal of his action as barred by the six-month statute of 

limitations imposed by the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 

U.S.C. § 185 (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Because Moogalian’s informal brief does not challenge the basis 

for the district court’s disposition, Moogalian has forfeited 

appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LEJONATHAN E. COX, ID # 1104964, )

Petitioner, )

vs. ) No. 3:06-CV-0123-B

) 

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal )

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, )

Respondent. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court

DENIES Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Transcript Order Form (doc. 28) and

Petitioner’s Request for Out of Time Appeal (doc. 29).

SIGNED this 26 day of May , 2009. th

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00123-B Document 34 Filed 05/26/09 Page 1 of 1 PageID 187
Discussion

FCSM 2021 Research and Policy Conference

November 3, 2021

Science and Engineering Indicators:

Measuring S&E Education, Workforce, and Research Output

Megan Fasules Todd

Senior Consultant

Micronomics, Inc

micronomics

        an ERS Group Company

0

Presentations

micronomics

        an ERS Group Company

Publications Output: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons

Science and Engineering Indicators Academic Research and Development

Science and Engineering Indicators: Trends in U.S. Elementary and Secondary STEM Education

The STEM Workforce: Scientists, Engineers and Skilled Technical Workers

1

New STEM workforce definition

micronomics

        an ERS Group Company

Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2020; and National Science Board, National Science Foundation, 2021. The STEM Labor Force of Today: Scientists, Engineers and Skilled Technical Workers. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022. NSB-2021-2.

2

[VALUE]%[VALUE]%BLS	S	&	E Indicators	6	23	Percent of the workforce
STEM is important to remain competitive in the global economy

micronomics

        an ERS Group Company

United States:

has the second highest publication output and most international collaboration

ranks 1st (out of 44 countries) in overall higher education expenditure on research and development but 23rd in higher education expenditure as a percentage of GDP

ranks 7th (out of 37 OECD countries) in science and 25th in mathematics literacy

3

Looking to the future, we need to improve access to STEM to all individuals.

micronomics

        an ERS Group Company

K-12 performance gaps exist among demographics groups

Black or African American and American Indian or Alaska Native doctoral recipients were more likely to use personal or family funds as their primary source of support, compared to other racial/ethnic groups

Hispanic or Latino and Black or African American workers are underrepresented in STEM occupations

4

Discussion

FCSM 2021 Research and Policy Conference

November 3, 2021

Science and Engineering Indicators:

Measuring S&E Education, Workforce, and Research Output

Megan Fasules Todd

Senior Consultant

Micronomics, Inc

mfasules@micronomics.com

micronomics

        an ERS Group Company

5
Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet.xlsx
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6230** 

MARY CARTER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

MR. COOPER , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Car olina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:10

- ct

- 03133

- D )

Submitted : April 2 8 , 2011 Decided: May 4 , 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Mary Carter, Appellant Pro S e.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mary Carter appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing h er 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint without
prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (200 6 ). We have reviewed

the re cord and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Cooper , No. 5:10

- ct

- 03133

- D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2011) . We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Darryl N. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-282

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. § 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe quarterly report of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Mauceli,principal executive officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managinggeneral partner of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m OR 78o(d)); and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.
| Date:  August  20, 2007 |   | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.        |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Managing General Partner                 |
|                         |   |                                     |
|                         |   | By: Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                         |   |                                     |
|                         |   | /s/ Michael J. Mauceli                   |   |
|                         |   | Michael J. Mauceli                       |
|                         |   | Manager and Member                       |
|                         |   | (principal executive officer)            |

 

This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section.  This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.

----
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - North American General Resources Corporation - Exhibit 10.2






AMENDMENT NO. 1

  TO WOOL BAY PROPERTY OPTION AGREEMENT 




THIS AGREEMENT dated as of the 15th day of April, 2003. 


BETWEEN:



  
    
      
         4763 NWT LTD., a company incorporated under the laws
          of the Northwest Territories 

         (hereinafter called “NWT”) 

      

    

  




AND:



  
    
      
         NORTH AMERICAN GENERAL RESOURCES CORPORATION., a Nevada
          corporation 

         (hereinafter called “NAGR”) 

      

    

  




WHEREAS:


 A.     The parties entered into an option
  agreement dated May, 2002 (the “Option Agreement”) pursuant to which
  NAGR was granted the option to earn a 70% interest in the Wool Bay Mineral Property
  (the “Property”), as more particularly described in the Option Agreement.


 B.      NAGR is required to spend
  $4,000 Cdn. on the Property in each of the four years following the date of
  the Option Agreement. 

 C.      NAGR wishes to obtain an
  immediate vested 70% interest in the Property. 

 NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the foregoing and
  of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter provided THE PARTIES HAVE
  AGREED AND DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 

 1.           
  In consideration of the immediate payment of $2,000, NWT hereby waives the property
  work requirements set out in paragraph 5 of the Option Agreement and NAGR shall
  be deemed to have completed its work requirements under the Option Agreement
  and to have acquired a 70% vested interest in the Property. 

 2.           The
  parties agree that notwithstanding the waiver by NWT of NAGR’S work obligations
  under the Option Agreement, NWT shall not be 

 1 








 obligated to contribute its share of any work programs under
  the Joint Venture Agreement until such time as the aggregate expenditures by
  NAGR shall be equal to $16,000. 

 3.           
  The parties agree to enter into such further and other documents as may be necessary
  to give effect to this Agreement. 

 4.           This
  Agreement may be executed in several parts in the same form and such parts as
  so executed shall together constitute one original agreement, and such parts,
  if more than one, shall be read together and construed as if all the signing
  parties hereto had executed one copy of this Agreement. 

  

4763 NWT LTD.

  by its authorized signatory: 

 /s/ Louis Covello

   Signature of Authorized Signatory


 Louis Covello

  Name of Authorized Signatory 

 President

   Position of Authorized Signatory


  

NORTH AMERICAN GENERAL RESOURCES CORP.

  by its authorized signatory: 

 /s/ Teresita Ortiz

   Signature of Authorized Signatory


 Teresita Ortiz

  Name of Authorized Signatory 

 Secretary

  Position of Authorized Signatory 

 

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO DIVISION

_________________________________________

DONALD DUANE BOAZ, PRO SE, §

TDCJ-CID # 840723, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 2:05-CV-0209

§

MERLE HUSKY, Unit Chaplain, Neal Unit, §

BILL PIERCE, Head Chaplain for TDCJ, §

§

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff DONALD DUANE BOAZ, proceeding pro se and while a prisoner in

the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, has filed suit

pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983 complaining against the above-named

defendants and has been granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis.

On February 23, 2006, plaintiff’s copy of the Court’s January 27, 2006 Filing Fee

Order and Order to Investigate and Submit Martinez Report were returned to the Court

undelivered and bearing the notation, “RTS Paroled.” Plaintiff has provided no forwarding

address to the Court.

It appears plaintiff has abandoned his cause and such cause should be dismissed

for failure to prosecute. Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d

734 (1962) (court possesses inherent power to dismiss sua sponte for lack of prosecution).

 

 Case 2:05-cv-00209-J-BB Document 11 Filed 03/17/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 46
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

The referral of the instant cause to the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby

withdrawn.

This Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

The Clerk will mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff and to any attorney of

record by first class mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this 17th day of March, 2006.

/s/ Mary Lou Robinson 

MARY LOU ROBINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 2:05-cv-00209-J-BB Document 11 Filed 03/17/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 47
Call for Abstracts 

Deadline: April 22, 2024 

2024 FCSM Research and Policy Conference

October 22 – 24, 2024

College Park Marriott Hotel & Conference Center

3501 University Blvd E, Hyattsville, MD 20783

The 2024 FCSM Research and Policy Conference provides a forum for experts and practitioners from

around the world to discuss and exchange current methodological knowledge and policy insights about

topics of current and critical importance to federal agencies.

We seek abstracts that address advances in credible and accurate survey and statistical methodologies from 

both research and policy perspectives. Submissions may address but are not limited to the following topics of 

importance to the Federal Statistical System: 

• Applied statistics

• Bayesian methods

• Data collection

• Data dissemination

• Data linkage

• Data processing

• Data quality

• Data science

• Establishment surveys

• Estimation and inference

• Privacy and disclosure control

• Questionnaire design

• Statistical computing

• Survey sampling and weighting

Policy Submissions: Abstracts should discuss a statistical policy topic and discuss the implications or 

impacts observed thus far and may raise questions or issues without having a definitive answer. 

Research Submissions: Abstracts should present research studies and findings related to the topics 

listed above. Submissions should not simply describe a data collection program or have limited 

application to topics relevant to the Federal Statistical System.

Organized Session Submissions: An organized session submission must include at least four (4) 

papers and a named chair. A discussant may also be listed. Priority will be given to sessions 

representing speakers from multiple agencies or that highlight both research and policy issues. 

Instructions: Submission instructions can be found at https://fcsmconf.org/

Questions:

• For conference information, or to be included on the mailing list, contact Paul Schroeder at

fcsm@copafs.org

• For questions on abstract submissions or the program, contact the Program Chair, Jeffrey

Gonzalez at gonzalez.jeffrey@bls.gov