alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Tarpon  Industries,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic  Report"),
I, James W. Bradshaw, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.    the  Periodic  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
               Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

         2.    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
               in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 17, 2007
                                         /s/ James W. Bradshaw
                                       ---------------------------
                                       James W. Bradshaw
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                             EXHIBIT 10.18 (III)

June 9, 2003


Mr. Robert W. Mahoney
Diebold, Incorporated
3800 TABS Drive
Uniontown, Ohio  44685

Dear Bob:

This will confirm our recent conversation regarding your consulting services.
Effective July 1, 2003, Diebold, Incorporated and you agree that your Retirement
and Consulting Agreement is amended by extending the "Consulting Period," as
defined in section 2a of that Agreement, such that the "Consulting Period" now
will terminate on December 31, 2003.

We very much appreciate your past consulting services and look forward to
working with you during the upcoming year.

If this letter accurately reflects our understanding, please indicate your
agreement by signing where designated below. I am including two signed originals
of this letter so please sign both, return one to me and keep one for your
records. Again, thank you very much.

Sincerely yours,

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED


Walden W. O'Dell
Chairman of the Board
President & Chief Executive Officer

WWO/ma

Accepted and Agreed by:


------------------------------------                     ----------------------
Robert W. Mahoney                                        Date


                                       27
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-518-CR

JEREMY LAMONT JACKSON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	A jury convicted Appellant Jeremy Lamont Jackson of murder, and the trial court sentenced him to ninety-nine years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant brings three points on appeal, challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to testify free from impeachment by prior convictions.  Because we hold that the trial court did not err, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

	Appellant filed a pretrial motion to testify free from impeachment by prior convictions.  The trial court denied Appellant’s motion, and Appellant elected not to testify rather than to be subject to impeachment.  Appellant argues that the trial court’s denial of his motion unconstitutionally limited his right to present a defense and denied him due process of law.  The State argues that by failing to testify and failing to offer a bill of exceptions to show the court what his testimony would have been, Appellant has forfeited his complaint.  We agree.

	As the State has pointed out, to preserve a complaint about a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of impeachment evidence, the defendant must actually testify.2  The Luce court discussed the difficulties inherent in addressing a complaint about the admissibility of impeachment evidence in a case where the defendant did not testify, specifically the reviewing court’s inability to weigh the probative value of the proffered impeachment evidence against its prejudicial effect when there is no record of the defendant’s testimony.3  Appellant argues that the trial court erred by not conducting the balancing test set out in Theus v. State.4  That case is distinguishable because Theus testified in his own defense, and the State impeached him with a prior felony conviction.  We cannot agree with Appellant that the threat of impeachment unconstitutionally prevented him from testifying or from presenting a defense.  We do not know what the testimony was or what defense he would have presented, nor do we know how the State would have attempted to impeach him.

	Because the record is inadequate to support Appellant’s three points, we overrule them and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

								LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

								JUSTICE

PANEL B:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  April 13, 2006
Walter DUNN, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019

Walter Dunn, III, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tonja Vickers Rook, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
| Dated:    | May      12, 2009 |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD      ENERGY M FUND, LLC                         |
|--------------------------|-------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |              |   |   |   |                                                      |
|                     |              | By:    | /s/    |   | ROBERT      E. SWANSON                                    |
|                     |              |   | Name:  |   | Robert      E. Swanson                                    |
|                     |              |   | Title: |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                     |              |   |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                        |
|                     |              |   |   |   |                                                      |
| Dated:                   | May      12, 2009 |   |   |   |                                                      |
|                     |              | By:    | /s/    |   | KATHLEEN      P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|                     |              |   | Name:  |   | Kathleen      P. McSherry                                 |
|                     |              |   | Title: |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                     |              |   |   |   | (Principal      Financial Officer)                        |
|                     |              |   |   |   |                                                      |
|                     |              |   |   |   |                                                      |

----
Burley A. HOWARD, DOC #079061, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3279

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Dolores FREIXA, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1150

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Natalia Costea, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Special Assistant Public Defender, and Luis A. Arguelles and Eric Rojo Dotel, Certified Legal Interns, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**State v. Lewars*, 259 So.3d 793 (Fla. 2018) (explaining that section 775.082(9)(a)(1), Fla. Stat. (2012), unambiguously supports the conclusion that "release from a county jail does not satisfy the 'released from' element of the statute's [prison release reoffender] definition").
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RUSSELL AINSWORTH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:17-cv-00077-KAW 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 

THIRD ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 

FOR RELIEF

Re: Dkt. No. 55

On August 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a third administrative motion for an extension of time 

to file a declaration in support of his consolidated opposition to the pending motions to dismiss. 

(Pl.’s Mot., Dkt. No. 55.)1 Plaintiff stated that he needed more time to attach evidence in support 

of his opposition, including emails and other communications with Defendants, which showed that 

the eviction was illegal and in retaliation for other conduct. Id. at 1-2. The Court does not 

generally consider this type of outside evidence in deciding a motion to dismiss. Rather, a motion 

to dismiss is decided based on the sufficiency of the allegations in the operative complaint. 

Navarro v. Block, 250 F.3d 729, 732 (9th Cir. 2001). 

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s administrative motion for an extension of time 

to file a supporting declaration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 15, 2017

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge

 

1

Plaintiff is reminded that he is required to lodge hard copies of all electronically-filed documents 

with chambers in accordance with Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7). Pursuant to the undersigned’s standing 

order, all chambers copies must have the running ECF header, which includes the docket number. 

(Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 4.)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Avis Group Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin M. Sheehan, as President of the Company, and Kurt Freudenberg, as Senior Vice President and Controller of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|/s/KEVIN M. SHEEHANKevin M. Sheehan
President
March 23, 2004                            |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/KURT FREUDENBERGKurt Freudenberg
Senior Vice President and Controller
March 23, 2004 |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
R.V. v. W.R.C. and L.C.

2160427

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

Affirmed.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.2    
    


                                      May 2,
2003 


Kevin
M. Sheehan

Cendant Corporation

9 West 57th Street

New York, NY 10019 


Dear
Kevin: 


        Reference
is made to the employment agreement by and between Cendant Corporation ("Cendant") and you dated as of April 1, 2003 (your "Employment Agreement"). Capitalized terms not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in your Employment Agreement. 



        As
you know, you will be eligible to receive an annual incentive bonus in respect of fiscal year 2003 with an opportunity of up to 200% (or such percentage as otherwise determined in
accordance with the annual bonus plan) of your eligible base compensation in 2003 (the "2003 Bonus Plan"). It is Cendant's intention to maintain this bonus opportunity for you, but Cendant reserves
the right to reduce your bonus opportunity in future years (but not below the 100% target minimum set forth in your Employment Agreement). 


        In
consideration for your eligibility to receive the 2003 Bonus Plan and also in consideration for your award of restricted stock units as of April 22, 2003 as part of Cendant's
Long Term Incentive Plan for 2003, this letter serves as a binding acknowledgment of your rights under your Employment Agreement as to the following matters: 



        1.     The
Incentive Compensation Award taken into account in determining the 300% severance payment to which you will become entitled if your employment is terminated at any
time during the Period of
Employment by Cendant due to a Without Cause Termination or by you due to a Constructive Discharge, will in no event be greater than 100% of your Base Salary in the year of such termination. 



        2.     You
acknowledge that Cendant is not obligated to provide you with any post-termination medical benefits other than benefits payable pursuant to the plans
listed on Attachment A hereto. 


        3.     You
acknowledge that Cendant will be terminating your current split dollar life insurance arrangement within the next few months and you agree that the termination of
such arrangement will not constitute a breach of your Employment Agreement by Cendant and will not form grounds for a Constructive Discharge. You agree to execute any documents necessary to terminate
such policies and/or transfer policy value to Cendant. Cendant is currently working towards providing a benefit arrangement to replace your split dollar life insurance arrangement and you will be
notified when such replacement arrangement is implemented. 




        Please
acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing below and returning a copy of this letter agreement to my attention. Thank you. 



	 	 	Very truly yours,



/s/  TERRY CONLEY      
	

Acknowledged and Agreed:



/s/  KEVIN M. SHEEHAN      	
 	

 	

 
	
	 	 	 







 
 
 

Attachment A  
    


        Avis Designated Executive Officer Post-Retirement Medical Program 


2











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.2


Attachment A
J.L., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2024

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ronny BATISTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-766

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Felipe CHAVEZ, DOC #Y40557, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1886

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
George MILLER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1814

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 30, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 24, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 604 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1156, K2025-1156.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-01924 Filed 1-29-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Heritage Property Investment Trust, Inc.
    and Unitholders of Bradley Operating Limited Partnership:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-116298 and 333-121578) on Form S-4/A of Heritage Property Investment
Trust, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2005, except as to Note 2, which is as of November 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Bradley Operating
Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners' capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004 and the financial statement schedule of real estate and accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 2004, which report appears in
the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Bradley Operating Limited Partnership.

(signed)
KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
November 11, 2005

---



QuickLinks
B.C. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160833

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

Affirmed.
Exhibit
10.53


 


	
  

  	
  Pharsight
  Corporation

  800 West El Camino Real, Suite 200

  Mountain View, CA 
  94040

  Phone: (650) 314-3800

  Fax: (650) 314-3810

  



 


June
16, 2003


 


VIA HAND DELIVERY


 


Shawn M. O’Connor


Pharsight Corporation


 


Dear Shawn:


 


As I have discussed with you,
Pharsight Corporation (the “Company”) in conjunction with Execustaff, Inc., is
pleased to offer you the additional stock option grant set forth in this
letter.


 


Stock Options


 


On April 24, 2003, the
Company’s Compensation Committee approved an additional stock option grant to
you, of five hundred thousand (500,000) shares of the Company’s common stock
with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of such shares on the
date of grant, in accordance with the terms of the Company’s 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan. Such options will vest over a four (4) year period as follows: 25% will
vest on the first anniversary date of grant and the remainder will vest in
equal monthly installments thereafter until fully vested (“Vesting Schedule”).  However, upon a Change of Control (as
defined in the Company’s 2000 Equity Incentive Plan), the Vesting Schedule will
accelerate, and any unvested shares shall accelerate one hundred percent (100%)
and become fully vested (“Accelerated Vesting”).


 


Miscellaneous


 


This letter sets forth
and forms the complete and exclusive statement concerning your additional stock
option grant and this letter supersedes any other agreements or promises made
to you by anyone, whether oral or written, concerning the subject matter set
forth in this letter.


 


We are very pleased to
offer you this additional stock option grant.


 


Sincerely,


PHARSIGHT CORPORATION


 


 


	
  /s/ Arthur H. Reidel

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Arthur H. Reidel

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman of the Board of Directors

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ACCEPTED:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/  Shawn M.
  O’Connor

  	
   

  	
  June 25, 2003

  	
   

  
	
  Shawn M. O’Connor

  	
   

  	
  Date

  	
   

  



 


1
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


               L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001

L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.
   L-3 Communications Corporation
     3931170 Canada Inc.
       Spar Aerospace Limited
         3023001 Canada Inc.
         Godfrey Aerospace Inc.
         Spar Aviation Services (U.S.) Limited
     AMI Instruments, Inc.
     Aviation Communications & Surveillance Systems, LLC (70%)
     Coleman Research Corporation
     Delsub, Inc.
     Digital Technics, L.L.C.
       Digital Technics, L.P. (25% + 75%)
     EER Systems, Inc.
     Electrodynamics, Inc.
     Emergent Information Technologies-East
       Kapos Associates Inc.
     Honeywell TCAS Inc.
     Hygienetics Environmental Services, Inc.
     Interstate Electronics Corporation
   KDI Precision Products, Inc.
     L-3 Communications Ancot Corporation
     L-3 Communications Atlantic Science & Technology Corporation
     L-3 Communications Aydin Corporation
       Aydin Foreign Sales Limited
       Aydin Investments, Inc.
       L-3 Communications Global Network Solutions U.K. Ltd.
     L-3 Communications DBS Microwave, Inc.
     L-3 Communications ESSCO, Inc.
       Electronic Space Systems International Corp.
       Electronic Space Systems (UK) Limited (90%)
       ESSCO Collins Limited (99.99%)
       ESSCO Satellite Systems Corp.
     L-3 Communications Holding GmbH
       L-3 Communications ELAC Nautik GmbH
         Arbeitsmedizinische Betreungsgesellschaft Kieler Bertriebe mbH 50%
         ELAC Nautik Unterstutzungska\Se GmbH
       Power Paragon (Deutschland) Holding GmbH (99% +1%)
         EuroAtlas Gesellschaft fur Leistungselektronik mbH
         JovyAtlas Elektrische Umformtechnik GmbH
         Narda Safety Test Solutions GmbH
           PMM Costruzioni
             Electtroniche Centro
             Misure Radioelettriche S.r.l. (98%)
       L-3 Communications ILEX Systems, Inc.
         ITel Solutions, LLC (50%)
       L-3 Communications Secure Information Technology, Inc.
<PAGE>

       L-3 Communications Security Systems Corporation
       L-3 Communications SPD Technologies, Inc.
         SPD Holdings, Inc.
           Henschel Inc.
           Pac Ord Inc.
           Power Paragon, Inc.
           SPD Electrical Systems, Inc.
           SPD Switchgear Inc.
       L-3 Communications Storm Control Systems, Inc.
       L-3 Communications U.K. Ltd.
         Storm Control Systems Limited
       L-3 Microdyne Holdings Corporation
         LogiMetrics, Inc. (53.5%)
         Logimetrics FSC, Inc. (53.5%)
         mmTECH, INC. (53.5%)
       L-Tres Comunicaciones Costa Rica, S.A.
       Microdyne Corporation
         Microdyne Communications Technologies Incorporated
           MCTI Acquisition Corporation
             Apcom, Inc.
             Celerity Systems Incorporated
         Microdyne Ltd.
         Microdyne Outsourcing Incorporated
       MPRI, Inc.
       Southern California Microwave, Inc.
       TrexCom (Asia) PTE, Ltd.
C.B. v. A.G.

2160967

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 30, 2018

Affirmed.