alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016098EN.01005501.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/55

---

Action brought on 18 January 2016 — Advanced Drainage Systems v OHIM (THE MOST ADVANCED NAME IN WATER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS)

(Case T-19/16)

(2016/C 098/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: C. Sleep, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘THE MOST ADVANCED NAME IN WATER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS’ — Application for registration No 13 405 188

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 November 2015 in Case R 1501/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | overturn the decision and allow the application to proceed to registration. |
| --- | --- |

—

overturn the decision and allow the application to proceed to registration.

| — | in the alternative, allow this appeal and overturn the Decision and remit the application back to the Examination division; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, allow this appeal and overturn the Decision and remit the application back to the Examination division;

| — | grant an award of costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

grant an award of costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Thomas A. THOMAS, Jr., Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION d/b/a Progress Energy Florida, Inc., Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2554

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Richard Edward ACQUAOTTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2529

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT D 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 44-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Adam Wolek (pro hac vice)

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

111 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 2800

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Tel: 312.836.4063 

Fax: 312.966.8598

awolek@taftlaw.com

DAVID A. MAKMAN (SBN 178195)

david@makmanlaw.com

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. MAKMAN 

655 Mariner’s Island Blvd, Suite 306 

San Mateo, CA 94404 

Telephone: (650) 242-1560

Facsimile: (408) 716-3052

Attorneys Appearing in a Limited Capacity for 

Counter-Defendants Boon Global Limited, F8 

Vietnam Company Limited, California Fitness & 

Yoga Centers, California Management Group, 

and Randy Dobson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong Kong corporation, by 

Mabel Mak, and MABEL MAK, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation, and PRAVEEN 

NARRA KUMAR, an individual,

Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-07387

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

GRANTING BOON GLOBAL 

LIMITED’S MOTION TO 

DISMISS INDYZEN’S PETITION 

TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 

PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(2), 

12(b)(3), AND (12)(b)(6)

Date: February __, 2018

Time: N/A

Dept.: N/A

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation, and PRAVEEN 

NARRA KUMAR, an individual,

Counter-Plaintiffs,

v.

PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong Kong corporation, BOON 

GLOBAL LIMITED, a Hong Kong corporation, F8 

VIETNAM COMPANY LIMITED, a Vietnam company, 

CALIFORNIA FITNESS & YOGA CENTERS, an entity of 

unknown form, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT GROUP, 

an entity of unknown form, and RANDY DOBSON, an 

individual,

Counter-Defendants.

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 44-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 2 of 3
[Proposed] Order Granting - 2 - No. 16-cv-07387

Boon’s Mot. to Dismiss

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on Counter-Plaintiff Indyzen, Inc.’s (“Indyzen”) 

Petition to Compel Arbitration (the “Petition”) as to Boon Global Limited (“Boon”), due notice having 

been given, and the Court being fully advised, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Boon’s Motion to Dismiss the Petition is hereby GRANTED. This Court does not have 

personal jurisdiction and venue over Boon as required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 

12(b)(3). Furthermore, to the extent that this Court has jurisdiction, the Petition should also be dismissed 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to properly state a claim. Indyzen’s

claims against Boon fall outside the scope of the arbitration clause agreed to by Indyzen and Parkridge 

Limited.

2. Boon is dismissed from this matter with prejudice.

Dated: _____________________ ______________________________

HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 44-4 Filed 01/18/18 Page 3 of 3
----

|                             | /s/ Thomas A. Vento                                         |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             | Name: Thomas A. Vento                                       |   |
|                             | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                             |                                                        |   |
|                             |                                                        |   |
| Date:  August 16, 2010 |                                                        |   |
|                             |                                                        |   |
|                             |                                                        |   |
|                             |                                                        |   |
|                             | /s/ Joseph R. Corrato                                       |   |
|                             | Name: Joseph R. Corrato                                     |   |
|                             | Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                             |                                                        |   |
|                             |                                                        |   |
|                             |                                                        |   |
| Date:  August 16, 2010 |                                                        |   |
A.A.M. v. In the matter of E.J.M.A., minor child

2170429

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 20, 2018

Dismissed.
Walter BAILEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1220

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019

Walter Bailey, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NUMBER 13-14-00117-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

SALVADOR MARTINEZ, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 25th District Court 

of Gonzales County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through the District Attorney in and for 

Gonzales County, Texas, has filed a motion for stay of proceedings in the above cause. 

On February 4, 2014, the trial court granted a motion to suppress evidence. The State 

has filed a notice of appeal and has requested a stay in the trial court’s proceedings 

pending disposition of its appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. § 44.01(a)(5), (e)
2

(West, Westlaw through 2007 Sess.). The Court, having examined and fully considered 

the motion for stay of proceedings, is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. 

The motion for stay is hereby GRANTED, and the trial court's proceedings are hereby 

ordered STAYED pending disposition of the State’s appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

24th day of February, 2014.
Ashley Yvonne PARKER, DOC #S27798, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5238

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 22, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10441

Summary Calendar

RONNIE THOMAS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

COLE JETER, Warden,

Federal Medical Center Fort Worth,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CV-801

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ronnie Thomas, federal prisoner # 09024-031, appeals the

district court’s decision to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition for a writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction. 

Thomas argued in his § 2241 petition that the sentences imposed

following his guilty-plea convictions of possessing with the

intent to distribute marijuana and misprision of a felony were

invalid. Thomas’s numerous claims were based on Apprendi v. New
No. 05-10441

-2-

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296

(2004), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 

Thomas’s § 2241 petition alleged errors that occurred at

sentencing. Such errors may not be asserted in a § 2241

petition. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 426-27

(5th Cir. 2005). Thomas has not shown that his claims satisfy

the mandates of the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See

Padilla, 416 F.3d at 426-27; Reyes-Requena v. United States,

243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Thomas’s contention that the

district court’s application of the savings clause violates the

Suspension Clause of the United States Constitution is

foreclosed. See Wesson v. United States Penitentiary Beaumont,

Tex., 305 F.3d 343, 346 (5th Cir. 2002); Reyes-Requena, 243 F.3d

at 901 n.19. Thomas’s argument that the AEDPA’s restrictions on

successive § 2255 motions violate the Suspension Clause lacks

merit. Cf. Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 664 (1996) (holding

that successive-petition restrictions in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) do

not violate the Suspension Clause). 

Thomas’s argument that the district court should have

considered his claims under its inherent powers because they do

not constitute a collateral attack on his sentence is

inadequately briefed and lacks merit. See United States v.

Reyes, 300 F.3d 555, 558 n.2 (5th Cir. 2002). Thomas’s

suggestion that the errors in his case were structural and should

override all statutory restrictions has been rejected by this
No. 05-10441

-3-

court. See United States v. Malveaux, 411 F.3d 558, 560 n.9

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 194 (2005). 

The district court did not err in dismissing Thomas’s § 2241

petition for lack of jurisdiction. See Christopher v. Miles,

342 F.3d 378, 385 (5th Cir. 2003). As the district court lacked

jurisdiction to consider Thomas’s substantive claims, we need not

consider them on appeal. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Harvey M. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2587

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen P. McSherry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy M
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: August 11, 2005

By:/s/ Kathleen P. McSherry
---------------------------
Kathleen P. McSherry
Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Financial
Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
The Role of Transportation Statistics in Measuring the Supply Chain

https://www.bts.gov/cfs

https://www.bts.gov/transborder

https://www.bts.gov/faf

https://www.bts.gov/satellite-accounts

http://www.bts.gov/

- Rolf R. Schmitt�Cha-Chi Fan�September 25, 2023
- The world of freight transportation
- Transportation and supply chains
- Sources of transportation data
- Data challenges
- Parting thought
- For further information
I 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 134 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the detention, 

inadmissibility, and removal of aliens who commit sexual assault. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2025 

Mr. BUCHANAN (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. 

BOST, Mr. WEBER of Texas, and Mr. EDWARDS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for the detention, inadmissibility, and removal of aliens 

who commit sexual assault. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting our Com5 munities from Sexual Predators Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DETENTION OF CERTAIN ALIENS WHO COMMIT SEX7 UAL ASSAULT. 

8 Section 236(c)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1226(c)(1)) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 134 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘, or’’ and 

2 inserting a comma; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (D), by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

4 end; and 

5 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(E)(i) is inadmissible under section 

8 212(a)(6)(A) or (C) or under section 212(a)(7); 

9 and 

10 ‘‘(ii) is charged with, arrested for, con11 victed of, admits having committed, or admits 

12 committing acts which constitute the essential 

13 elements of, any offense involving sexual assault 

14 (as such term is defined in section 

15 214(d)(3)(A)),’’. 

16 SEC. 3. INADMISSILIBITY AND DEPORTABILITY RELATED 

17 TO SEXUAL ASSAULT. 

18 (a) INADMISSIBILITY.— Section 212(a)(2) of the Im19 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is 

20 amended by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(J) SEXUAL ASSAULT.—Any alien who 

22 has been convicted of, who admits having com23 mitted, or who admits committing acts which 

24 constitute the essential elements of, any offense 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 134 IH

1 involving sexual assault (as such term is defined 

2 in section 214(d)(3)(A)), is inadmissible.’’. 

3 (b) DEPORTABILITY.—Section 237(a)(2) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(G) SEXUAL ASSAULT.—Any alien who 

7 has been convicted of, who admits having com8 mitted, or who admits committing acts which 

9 constitute the essential elements of, any offense 

10 involving sexual assault (as such term is defined 

11 in section 214(d)(3)(A)), is deportable.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Christy L. Shaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                         
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Christy L. Shaffer                                                  
|                     |  | Christy L. Shaffer Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Title: The NASS Question Repository System 

Daniel G. Beckler 

United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural 

Statistics Service, Research and Development Division, 

Room 305, 3251 Old Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22030, 

phone 703-235-5213, fax 703-235-3386, dan_beckler@nass.usda.gov 

Keywords: Web data collection; questionnaire design 

The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) conducts hundreds 

of surveys annually on the nation’s farmers and agribusinesses. For most 

surveys multiple questionnaire versions are needed to address 

differences in agriculture between states. The questionnaires also need 

to be developed for multiple data collection modes: mail, telephone/CATI, 

and most recently the World Wide Web. In order to efficiently create the 

numerous questionnaires needed for all of the survey, state and mode 

combinations, NASS is developing a client-server based Question Repository 

System (QRS). The QRS includes a user interface to build properly formatted 

questions for the various modes; these questions are then stored in a 

database. The stored questions are then retrieved and used to build 

questionnaires, which may be saved, printed or ported to a Web server. 

This paper describes the capabilities and some technical details of the QRS.
Statement

Kenneth A. Spearman, Board Member

Farm Credit Administration Board Meeting

December 8, 2016

Dallas, congratulations on being designated by the President to chair the FCA Board. I have 

every confidence that you will do an outstanding job of ensuring the System remains safe 

and sound and that it continues to serve its mission of providing constructive credit to all of 

America’s farmers and ranchers.

Also, I want to thank you and Jeff for the support and input you have given me during my 

chairmanship. In addition, I want to thank Bill, the senior staff, and all the employees at 

FCA. It is your dedication and service that is the driving force of the agency, and who 

deserve much of the credit for our success.
II 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 26 

To exclude locality adjustments from average pay for purposes of computing 

the amount of retirement annuities of new employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 7, 2025 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To exclude locality adjustments from average pay for purposes of computing the amount of retirement annuities 

of new employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF LOCALITY ADJUSTMENTS FROM 

4 RETIREMENT ANNUITIES. 

5 Section 8401 of title 5, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘, which for 

8 a revised average pay employee shall exclude any lo9 cality-based comparability payments under section 

10 5304 or 5304a,’’ after ‘‘rates of basic pay’’; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 26 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (38)(B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (3) in paragraph (39), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(40) the term ‘revised average pay employee’ 

7 means an individual who— 

8 ‘‘(A) on the date of enactment of this 

9 paragraph— 

10 ‘‘(i) is not an employee or Member 

11 covered under this chapter; 

12 ‘‘(ii) is not performing civilian service 

13 which is creditable service under section 

14 8411; and 

15 ‘‘(iii) has not performed any civilian 

16 service which is creditable service under 

17 section 8411; and 

18 ‘‘(B) after the date of enactment of this 

19 paragraph, becomes employed as an employee 

20 or becomes a Member covered under this chap21 ter performing service which is creditable serv22 ice under section 8411.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB