alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40362

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JULIO ALEJANDRO ARIAS-BARRON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:11-CR-68-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julio Alejandro 

Arias-Barron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arias-Barron has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40362 Document: 00513804026 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-40362

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40362 Document: 00513804026 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 201 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 201

 Amending the Standing Rules of the Senate to enable the participation 
              of absent Senators during a national crisis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 29, 2021

  Mr. Portman (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Warren, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
  King, and Mr. Schatz) submitted the following resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Standing Rules of the Senate to enable the participation 
              of absent Senators during a national crisis.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PARTICIPATION OF ABSENT SENATORS DURING A NATIONAL CRISIS.

     Rule XII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
            ``5. Senators may use technology that has been approved by 
        the Secretary of the Senate and the Sergeant at Arms and 
        Doorkeeper of the Senate as reliable and secure to cast their 
        votes from outside of the Senate Chamber if the majority leader 
        or his or her designee and the minority leader or his or her 
        designee jointly determine that an extraordinary crisis of 
        national extent exists in which it would be infeasible for 
        Senators to cast their votes in person. If such a crisis is 
        determined to exist, Senators may cast votes under this 
        paragraph during the 30-day period beginning on the date on 
        which such determination is made, unless such period is 
        extended for one or more additional 30-day periods by an 
        affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen 
        and sworn. During such period, Senators participating remotely 
        and using approved technology to cast their votes under this 
        paragraph shall be deemed present for purposes of establishing 
        the presence of a quorum. The determination made under this 
        paragraph shall not rely on any decision of any other branch of 
        the United States Government. The majority leader or his or her 
        designee and the minority leader or his or her designee shall 
        submit at the beginning of the first session of each Congress 
        an order for designees of each caucus in the case of such a 
        crisis.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Roger Wilfredo DE LEON ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-71165.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*476Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 23, 2004.

Suzanne B. Friedman, Law Offices of Suzanne B. Friedman, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Roger Wilfredo De Leon Ortiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal.

De Leon Ortiz’s contentions that the BIA’s streamlining regulations violate his right to due process and are void for vagueness are foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849-51 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the BIA’s streamlining procedure does not violate an alien’s due process rights).

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), petitioner’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the motion for stay of removal was granted, or continued based on the government’s filing of a notice of non-opposition, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, *nunc pro tunc,*to the filing of the motion for stay of removal, and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas R. Staab, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 13, 2009 |  |  |  |                                                                          
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/    THOMAS R. STAAB,
II                                               
|                     |  |  |  | Thomas R. Staab, II Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. OP 22-0285

MICHAEL BRADLEY BURTON,

Petitioner,

v.

CAPTAIN TOM SEIFERT, Captain,

Respondent.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Respondent’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Respondent is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 1, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 29 2022

06/29/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0285
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 69 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 69

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of 
         the President and Vice President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2022

 Mr. Merkley (for himself, Mr. Markey, and Ms. Hirono) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of 
         the President and Vice President of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The President and Vice President shall be jointly 
elected by the direct popular vote of the people of the several States 
and the District constituting the seat of Government of the United 
States who are over the age of 18.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall determine the time, place, and manner 
of holding the election, and the manner in which the results of the 
election shall be ascertained and declared, and shall establish one day 
throughout the United States by which any period of voting shall be 
complete and during which any eligible voter may cast a vote.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Sahara Pavilion North U.S., Inc., a Nevada corporation

Pan Pacific Development (Chino), Inc., a Delaware corporation

Pan Pacific Development (Kentucky), Inc., a Kentucky corporation

Pan Pacific Development (New Mexico), Inc., a New Mexico corporation

Pan Pacific Development (Olympia Square), Inc., a Washington corporation

Pan Pacific Development (Rosewood), Inc., a California corporation

Pan Pacific Development (Tennesee), L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee) Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Melrose Village Plaza Partners, a California partnership

North Coast Health Center, a California joint venture partnership

Pan Pacific (Clackamas), Inc., a Delaware corporation

Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Maysville Marketsquare Associates L.P., a Kentucky limited partnership

Pan Pacific (Clackamas), LLC, an Oregon limited liability company

Pan Pacific (Sunset Mall), LLC, an Oregon limited liability company
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Explore Search: Geology General

Filters

              - science_education(2)
              - science_faqs(32)
              - science_science(43)
              - products_data(30)
              - products_maps(182)
              - products_publications(706)
              - multimedia_audio(154)
              - multimedia_audio-141766(144)
              - multimedia_audio-141767(10)
              - multimedia_image(92)
              - multimedia_image-141769(2)
              - multimedia_image-141771(73)
              - multimedia_image-141772(3)
              - multimedia_image-141774(1)
              - multimedia_image-141775(12)
              - (-)multimedia_image-141776(1)
              - multimedia_video(312)
              - multimedia_video-149194(183)
              - multimedia_video-149195(44)
              - multimedia_video-149196(2)
              - multimedia_video-149197(24)
              - multimedia_video-149198(22)
              - multimedia_video-149225(3)
              - documents_file(5)
              - documents_file-149204(1)
              - documents_file-149213(1)
              - (-)documents_file-149215(1)
              - documents_file-149218(1)
              - documents_file-149219(1)
              - news_news-149249(1)
              - news_newsletters(1)
              - connect_staff_profiles(6)
              - other_basic-42(15)

## By Location

## By Year

Illustrations        January 26, 2015        USGS SIM 3250: Geologic Map of the Agnesi Quadrangle (V–45), Venus

Strategic Plan        November 30, 2022        Western Fisheries Research Center 2023-2027 Strategic Plan
Click here to Register on Zoom

Uses, Potential Applications, and Issues

Federal Committee on

Statistical Methodology

Tuesday, Oct 31, 2023 3 pm - 4:30 pm ET

NISS

National Institute of

Statistical Sciences

National Institute of

Statistical Sciences

AI in Federal Government

The National Institute of Statistical Sciences (NISS) and the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) are

collaborating to present the NISS/FCSM Webinar Series on AI in Federal Government: Uses, Potential Applications, and

Issues. Federal practitioners and managers will benefit from behind-the-scenes information on uses of AI in federal agencies and

from insights on how agencies meet organizational, managerial, and ethical challenges in harnessing the power of AI. Participation

by researchers and managers in the webinars can help streamline current efforts to adopt AI and inspire new endeavors. The

NISS/FCSM webinar provides unique opportunities not easily available through other forums or venues. Federal staff with all

levels of AI expertise, and supervisors of researchers, will benefit from learning how AI is used now, how it might be used in the

future, and how the issues and challenges it poses are being met by federal agencies. Opening remarks will be presented by the

incoming NISS Director David S. Matteson.

Director of the Division of

Research and

Methodology, National

Center for Health Statistics

JENNIFER

PARKER

MODERATOR

Former Chief

Statistician of the

United States

XUMING

HE

NANCY

POTOK

BHRAMAR

MUKHERJEE

Professor and Chair of

the Department of

Statistics and Data

Science at the

Washington University in

St. Louis & President of

the International

Statistical Institute

Senior Advisor for

Data Access and

Privacy, U.S. Census

Bureau

Professor and Chair

of Department of

Biostatistics,

University of

Michigan

MICHAEL

HAWES

PANELISTS

See full details: https://www.niss.org/events/ai-federal-government-usespotential-applications-and-issues

Virtual Zoom Webinar. Free Registration.

OVERVIEW

Senior Statistician

and Senior Science

Policy Analyst in the

Office of the Chief

Statistician of the

United States

CHRIS

MARCUM

NISS | www.niss.org FCSM | www.fcsm.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1








Certification of Principal Executive Officer


and Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, Irwin Balaban, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Robocom Systems International Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




By:
/s/ Irwin BalabanName:
Irwin BalabanTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





March 14, 2011





__________________





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Robocom Systems International Inc. and will be retained by Robocom Systems International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
John LATHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2638

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 03-4509

WILLIAM J. TUCK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Henry E. Hudson, District Judge.

(CR-02-469)

Submitted: December 11, 2003

Decided: December 23, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Frank W. Dunham, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Robert Wagner,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Olivia N. Hawkins,

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

William J. Tuck appeals from his conviction following his conditional guilty plea for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). He was sentenced to thirtyseven months in prison. On appeal, Tuck challenges: (1) the district

court’s denial of his motion to suppress several firearms recovered

from his vehicle; and (2) the district court’s denial of a reduction in

his sentence under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1

(2002). We affirm. 

Factual findings underlying a motion to suppress are reviewed for

clear error and legal determinations are reviewed de novo. Ornelas v.

United States, 517 U.S. 690, 691 (1996); United States v. Rusher, 966

F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir. 1992). When a suppression motion has been

denied, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the

Government. United States v. Seidman, 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir.

1998). Guided by these standards, we find no error in the district

court’s determination that the police officers did not infringe Tuck’s

Fourth Amendment rights. 

Section 2K2.1(b)(2) of the Guidelines provides for a reduction in

sentence when the firearms in question are possessed by a disqualified

person "solely for lawful sporting purposes or collection." Defendant

bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that

he is entitled to a specified sentencing reduction, and we review the

court’s determination for clear error. See United States v. Abdi, 342

F.3d 313, 317 (4th Cir. 2003). We conclude the district court did not

err in denying a § 2K2.1(b)(2) reduction in sentence. 

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Tuck’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. TUCK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RACHEL CONDRY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00183-VC 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE MOTION TO SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 47

With their motion to dismiss, the defendants submitted a letter sent by Jance Hoy to the 

United Healthcare Appeals Board. The defendants asked to seal the entire letter and its 

attachments. That request is too broad. Although parts of the letter and attachments may be 

sealable because they contain protected or private health information, the entire letter is not 

sealable. See Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2016); In re 

Hewlett-Packard Co. S'holder Derivative Litig., No. 12-cv-06003-CRB (N.D. Cal. July 28, 

2015), Dkt. No. 411. The motion to file under seal is denied without prejudice to a renewed 

request filed within 14 days that seeks to redact only sealable information.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 15, 2017

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 62 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 62

 Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate the commitment of 
     the United States to a free press by honoring journalists who 
            sacrificed their lives in service to that cause.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2022

 Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Portman, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced 
 the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to 
             the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Approving the location of a memorial to commemorate the commitment of 
     the United States to a free press by honoring journalists who 
            sacrificed their lives in service to that cause.

Whereas section 8908(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code, provides that the 
        location of a commemorative work in Area I, as depicted on the map 
        entitled ``Commemorative Areas Washington, DC and Environs'', numbered 
        869/86501 B, and dated June 24, 2003 (referred to in this preamble as 
        ``Area I''), shall be deemed to be authorized only if a recommendation 
        for the location is approved by law not later than 150 calendar days 
        after the date on which Congress is notified of the recommendation;
Whereas the Fallen Journalists Memorial Act (40 U.S.C. 8903 note; Public Law 
        116-253) authorized the Fallen Journalists Memorial Foundation to 
        establish a memorial on Federal land in the District of Columbia and its 
        environs to commemorate the commitment of the United States to a free 
        press by honoring journalists who sacrificed their lives in service to 
        that cause (referred to in this preamble as the ``memorial''); and
Whereas the Secretary of the Interior has notified Congress of the determination 
        of the Secretary of the Interior that the memorial should be located in 
        Area I: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the location of a 
commemorative work to commemorate the commitment of the United States 
to a free press by honoring journalists who sacrificed their lives in 
service to that cause within Area I, as depicted on the map entitled 
``Commemorative Areas Washington, DC and Environs'', numbered 869/86501 
B, and dated June 24, 2003, is approved.
                                 <all>
```