alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Andre WALKER and Opal Walker, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE on Behalf OF the HOLDERS OF the J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST 2006-CH2 ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-CH2, Silverlakes Community Association, Inc. and Sapphire Bay Recreation Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D18-1861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 30, 2019]

Kendrick Almaguer and Emmanuel Charles of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for appellants.

Katherine M. Joffe and Brian K. Hole of Holland & Knight LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee U.S. Bank, N.A.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., May and Conner, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Steven L. Sunyich, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 15, 2010





/s/  Steven L. SunyichSteven L. Sunyich, CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM NICHOLSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 192 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Peter C. Brown,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Marquee HoldingsInc.;

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)              Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: April 16, 2007 | /s/ PETER C. BROWN                    |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                 | Peter C. Brown                        |
|                 | Chairman of the Board,                |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

40

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 20 (Friday, January 31, 2025)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 8637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02098]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 20 / Friday, January 31, 2025 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 8637]]

                Executive Order 14174 of January 21, 2025

                
Revocation of Certain Executive Orders

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, it is hereby ordered:

                Section 1. Revocation. The following Executive Orders 
                are hereby revoked:

                    (a) Executive Order 14042 of September 9, 2021 
                (Ensuring Adequate COVID Safety Protocols for Federal 
                Contractors); and
                    (b) Executive Order 14043 of September 9, 2021 
                (Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for 
                Federal Employees).

                Sec. 2. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order 
                shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or 
the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

                    (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with 
                applicable law and subject to the availability of 
                appropriations.
                    (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, 
                create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 
                enforceable at law or in equity by any party against 
                the United States, its departments, agencies, or 
                entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any 
                other person.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    January 21, 2025.

[FR Doc. 2025-02098
Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3395-F4-P
```
Oscar Grey TURBERVILLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-1330

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 2019

Oscar Grey Turberville, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

*1194The petition for belated appeal is dismissed as untimely. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).

Rowe, Makar, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 108 

To make technical corrections to the amendments made by Senate Resolution 

30 (117th Congress) to Senate Resolution 458 (98th Congress), and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To make technical corrections to the amendments made by 

Senate Resolution 30 (117th Congress) to Senate Resolution 458 (98th Congress), and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. PAY OF STAFF DISPLACED BY A CHANGE IN 

3 LEADERSHIP. 

4 Section 6 of Senate Resolution 458 (98th Congress), 

5 agreed to October 4, 1984, is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (3)(A)— 

8 (i) in the matter preceding clause (i), 

9 by striking ‘‘an employee’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 108 ATS 

1 (ii) in clause (i), by inserting ‘‘an em2 ployee’’ before ‘‘of a committee’’; 

3 (iii) in clause (ii)— 

4 (I) by inserting ‘‘an employee’’ 

5 before ‘‘in an office’’; and 

6 (II) by striking ‘‘or or’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (iv) in the first clause designated as 

9 clause (iii), as added by Senate Resolution 

10 805 (116th Congress), agreed to December 

11 17, 2020— 

12 (I) by inserting ‘‘an employee’’ 

13 before ‘‘in an office’’; and 

14 (II) by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

15 (v) by redesignating the second clause 

16 designated as clause (iii), as added by Sen17 ate Resolution 30 (117th Congress), 

18 agreed to February 3, 2021, as clause (iv); 

19 and 

20 (vi) in clause (iv), as so redesignated, 

21 in the matter preceding subclause (I), by 

22 inserting ‘‘an employee or officer (includ23 ing the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper 

24 of the Senate and the Secretary of the 

25 Senate) in the office’’ before ‘‘of’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 108 ATS 

1 (B) in paragraph (4)— 

2 (i) in subparagraph (A)— 

3 (I) in clause (iii), by striking 

4 ‘‘employment described in paragraph 

5 (3)(A)(iii)(I)’’ and inserting ‘‘an indi6 vidual described in paragraph 

7 (3)(A)(iv)(I)’’; and 

8 (II) in clause (iv), by striking 

9 ‘‘employment described in paragraph 

10 (3)(A)(iii)(II)’’ and inserting ‘‘an indi11 vidual described in paragraph 

12 (3)(A)(iv)(II)’’; and 

13 (ii) in subparagraph (B)— 

14 (I) by striking ‘‘or after the expi15 ration’’ and inserting ‘‘after the expi16 ration’’; and 

17 (II) by inserting ‘‘or after the 

18 change in the individual occupying the 

19 position described in clause (iii) or 

20 (iv) of subparagraph (A), as applica21 ble,’’ after ‘‘clause (ii) or (iii) of para22 graph (3)(A),’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (c)— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•SRES 108 ATS 

1 (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking 

2 ‘‘clause (i) or (ii)’’ and inserting ‘‘clause (i), 

3 (ii), or (iv)’’; and 

4 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘such 

5 employee’’ and inserting ‘‘such displaced staff 

6 member’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40758

Summary Calendar

 

LARRY DONNELL MCSHAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

C. NGUYEN; SHEILA STENNER; L. MCQUEEN;

D. FENNEN; T.L. DOERR; HERBERT SCOTT;

J.D. BALLARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-92-CV-495

- - - - - - - - - -

April 4, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry McShan, Texas prisoner # 316724, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit as frivolous. 

McShan has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

(IFP) on appeal. The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED. 

No initial partial filing fee is required. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(4). However, McShan shall make monthly payments of
No. 96-40758

- 2 -

twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his 

prison account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The governmental

department having custody of McShan is directed to forward the

payments from his prison account to the clerk of the district

court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10, until the

filing fee of $105 is paid. See id. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that McShan’s application for a

certificate of appealability (COA) is DENIED as unnecessary. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

There is no arguable merit to McShan’s contentions that he

is entitled to relief on grounds that (1) the district court

failed to view his pleadings under less stringent standards than

if they had been drafted by an attorney; (2) he was entitled to a

hearing as provided in Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir.

1985); and (3) the district court should have appointed counsel

to represent him. Because McShan’s appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

IFP GRANTED; COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
A copy of this paper was not available in time for the pre-conference proceedings. 

The paper should appear on the post-conference website. Please check the following link 

after January 15, 2006. 

http://www.fcsm.gov/reports/ 

Developing a Generic Survey 

Marla Smith and Jan Matuszko (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) 

Over the last 30 years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has conducted 

business surveys of numerous industrial sectors. These surveys have collected economic 

and technical information used to develop regulations for industrial water pollution 

control. For each industry, EPA has designed unique sampling plans and questionnaires 

by evaluating factors such as production processes, typical wastewater treatment, and 

business practices. This development phase is extremely time-consuming. This 

presentation will describe our efforts to develop a generic screener questionnaire that can 

be quickly tailored to different industries. These screeners would be used to obtain a 

broad overview of an industry and to better identify the target population for a more 

detailed questionnaire. While industries have common elements, the terms used by each 

can be different, and thus, we will need to confer with other EPA staff and industry 

representatives to develop questions that will be relevant to multiple industries, while still 

providing information that can be used in the regulatory process. In addition, the level of 

sophistication varies from industry to industry, and sometimes within an industry. We 

will explore possible solutions, such as the feasibility of telephone interviews, rather than 

mail surveys, because this mode might allow us to better tailor the questions to the 

respondent, and reduce the rate of nonresponse.
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 22 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall of 

the Capitol Visitor Center in connection with memorial services to be 

conducted in the rotunda of the Capitol for the Honorable Robert Joseph 

Dole, a Senator from the State of Kansas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2021 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the use of the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center in connection 

with memorial services to be conducted in the rotunda 

of the Capitol for the Honorable Robert Joseph Dole, 

a Senator from the State of Kansas. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer the catafalque which is situ4 ated in the Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center 

5 to the rotunda of the Capitol so that such catafalque may 

6 be used in connection with services to be conducted there 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 22 ATS 

1 for the Honorable Robert Joseph Dole, a Senator from 

2 the State of Kansas. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Richard KELLEY and Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Wallace MCKENNA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-771

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Suite 700

                                                             1000 Wilshire Blvd.
                                                     Los Angeles, CA 90017-2464
                                                                   213 627-1717
                                                               FAX 213 624-6793

                                                           GRANT THORNTON (LOGO)

                                             GRANT THORNTON LLP  Accountants and
                                                          Management Consultants
                                                         The U.S. Member Firm of
                                                    Grant Thornton International

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION  ON COMPLIANCE WITH
MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM
FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS

Board of Directors
Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.

We have examined  management's  assertion about Countrywide  Credit  Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (which includes its wholly-owned  subsidiary,  Countrywide
Home Loans,  Inc.  formerly  Countrywide  Funding  Corporation)  ("the Company")
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKERS  (USAP) as of and for the year ended  February 28, 1997  included in the
accompanying  management assertion.  Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based
on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion,  management's assertion that Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc.
and  Subsidiaries  (which includes  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  Countrywide  Home
Loans, Inc.) complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended  February  28,  1997 is fairly  stated,  in all  material
respects.

/s/Grant Thornton LLP
Los Angeles, California
April 22, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 25 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.25
                                      Agreed to January 10, 2022        

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in recognition of the long and distinguished service rendered to 
the Nation by Harry Mason Reid, Jr., a Senator from the State of 
Nevada, his remains be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the 
Capitol on Wednesday, January 12, 2022, and the Architect of the 
Capitol, under the direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate 
and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take all 
necessary steps for the accomplishment of that purpose.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
J.E. v. CLEBURNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2161006

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Affirmed.