alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul A. Cloutier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     |  |                      
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|/s/ PAUL A. CLOUTIER                                 |  | Dated: August 5, 2009
|Paul A. Cloutier                                     |  |                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BankFinancial
Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



49
Case 3:05-cv-01061-N Document 9 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 24
Douglas Alton NETTLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 3 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 3

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
state of the remains of the last Medal of Honor recipient of World War 
    II, in order to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 
 16,000,000 men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 
                       States from 1941 to 1945.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2021

 Mr. Manchin (for himself, Mrs. Capito, and Mr. Romney) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in 
state of the remains of the last Medal of Honor recipient of World War 
    II, in order to honor the Greatest Generation and the more than 
 16,000,000 men and women who served in the Armed Forces of the United 
                       States from 1941 to 1945.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENT OF 
              WORLD WAR II.

    (a) Use of Rotunda.--The individual who is the last surviving 
recipient of the Medal of Honor for acts performed during World War II 
shall be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol upon 
death, if the individual (or the next of kin of the individual) so 
elects.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives, shall take the necessary steps to 
implement subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armitage Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Lawrence
Stephenson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
9th day of August, 2005.


/s/  Lawrence Stephenson
------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Xavier YCAZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1111

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019.

Law Offices of David A. Frankel, P.A., and David A. Frankel (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41349

Conference Calendar

 

ARTHUR LEE LAWS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; E.V. CHANDLER, Warden,

Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-549

- - - - - - - - - -

June 14, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arthur Lee Laws, federal prisoner #49045-080, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in

which he challenged the legality of his sentence. Laws argues

that his claim was properly brought in a § 2241 petition because

relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is inadequate as he cannot meet the

requirements for filing a successive § 2255 motion.

Although he purports to rely on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530

U.S. 466 (2000), the true nature of Laws’ claim is that the

Sentencing Guidelines were incorrectly applied in his case. This
No. 00-41349

-2-

claim is not cognizable in a § 2255 motion. See United States v.

Segler, 37 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 1994). This is a

nonconstitutional claim that could have been raised on direct

appeal. Id. The fact that Laws cannot raise the issue in a

§ 2255 motion does not make that remedy inadequate. 

The district court did not err in determining that Laws had

failed to show that relief under § 2255 was inadequate and did

not err in dismissing his § 2241 petition. Accordingly, its

judgment is AFFIRMED.
Kelvin Keith WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1877

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 31, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RAYMOND RAMIREZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2823

[January 31, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-9673 CF10A.

Raymond Ramirez, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Grady NELSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-93

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Carolyn M. MrozCarolyn M. MrozPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2009By:

/s/ Edmund T. LeonardEdmund T. LeonardChairman of the Board and Chief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2009
Jorge Juan RAMOS, Appellant, v. John G. WIRTH, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-2290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FINJAN LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF 

ORDER REQUESTING PARTIES BE 

PREPARED TO DISCUSS TRIAL AT 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 MOTION 

HEARING

The Court requests that counsel be prepared to discuss the trial schedule and logistics at the 

September 17, 2020 motion hearing. No written submissions are required.

Dated: September 15, 2020

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 709 Filed 09/15/20 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 39 PageID 632
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 2 of 39 PageID 633
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 3 of 39 PageID 634
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 4 of 39 PageID 635
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 5 of 39 PageID 636
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 6 of 39 PageID 637
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 7 of 39 PageID 638
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 8 of 39 PageID 639
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 9 of 39 PageID 640
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 10 of 39 PageID 641
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 11 of 39 PageID 642
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 12 of 39 PageID 643
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 13 of 39 PageID 644
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 14 of 39 PageID 645
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 15 of 39 PageID 646
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 16 of 39 PageID 647
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 17 of 39 PageID 648
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 18 of 39 PageID 649
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 19 of 39 PageID 650
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 20 of 39 PageID 651
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 21 of 39 PageID 652
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 22 of 39 PageID 653
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 23 of 39 PageID 654
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 24 of 39 PageID 655
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 25 of 39 PageID 656
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 26 of 39 PageID 657
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 27 of 39 PageID 658
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 28 of 39 PageID 659
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 29 of 39 PageID 660
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 30 of 39 PageID 661
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 31 of 39 PageID 662
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 32 of 39 PageID 663
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 33 of 39 PageID 664
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 34 of 39 PageID 665
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 35 of 39 PageID 666
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 36 of 39 PageID 667
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 37 of 39 PageID 668
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 38 of 39 PageID 669
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 10 Filed 11/01/05 Page 39 of 39 PageID 670
Mark C. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida United States of America, et al., Appellees.

No. 1D18-0242

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUTPUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 28 PageID 802
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 28 PageID 803
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 3 of 28 PageID 804
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 4 of 28 PageID 805
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 5 of 28 PageID 806
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 6 of 28 PageID 807
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 7 of 28 PageID 808
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 8 of 28 PageID 809
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 9 of 28 PageID 810
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 10 of 28 PageID 811
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 11 of 28 PageID 812
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 12 of 28 PageID 813
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 13 of 28 PageID 814
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 14 of 28 PageID 815
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 15 of 28 PageID 816
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 16 of 28 PageID 817
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 17 of 28 PageID 818
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 18 of 28 PageID 819
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 19 of 28 PageID 820
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 20 of 28 PageID 821
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 21 of 28 PageID 822
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 22 of 28 PageID 823
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 23 of 28 PageID 824
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 24 of 28 PageID 825
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 25 of 28 PageID 826
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 26 of 28 PageID 827
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 27 of 28 PageID 828
Case 3:06-cv-00072-M Document 10 Filed 06/12/06 Page 28 of 28 PageID 829
Case 3:05-cv-01589-B Document 4 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 16
# C_2017239EN.01002401.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 13 April 2017 — Bundeskammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte v ING-DiBa Direktbank Austria Niederlassung der ING-DiBa AG

(Case C-191/17)

(2017/C 239/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundeskammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte

Applicant:

Defendant: ING-DiBa Direktbank Austria Niederlassung der ING-DiBa AG

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 4(14) of Directive 2007/64/EC (1) on payment services in the internal market (the Payment Services Directive) be interpreted as meaning that an online savings account with which a customer (without notice and without any particular involvement of the bank) may by way of telebanking make deposits into and withdrawals from a reference account (a current account in Austria) held in his name is also to be included within the term ‘payment account’ (Article 4(14) of that directive) and thus falls within the scope of that directive?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC (OJ 2007 L 319, p. 1).

1

---
R.V., III, the Father, Appellant, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

No. 4D19-20

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 29, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD.,

Appellants

v.

HULU, LLC,

Appellee

______________________ 

2022-1990, 2022-1991

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-

00298, IPR2021-00304.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, 

VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES 

CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW,

RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG,

KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA. 

 BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers 

LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN; 

Case: 22-1990 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2024
NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San 

Francisco, CA. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 5, 2024

Date

Case: 22-1990 Document: 60 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2024
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officers of Reef Oil & Gas Partners LLC, the managing generalpartner of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P. (the “Partnership”), do hereby certifythat to such officers’ knowledge:

 

(a)   the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Partnership fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)   theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of U.S.C. §1350, andnot for any other purpose.

 
| Date: November 14, 2005 |   | /s/ Michael J. Mauceli          |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                    |   | Michael J. Mauceli              |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer         |
|                    |   | Reef Oil & Gas Partners LLC |
|                    |   |                            |
|                    |   | /s/ Daniel C. Sibley            |
|                    |   | Daniel C. Sibley                |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer         |
|                    |   | Reef Oil & Gas Partners LLC |

 

**This certification shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it bedeemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent as shall beexpressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.**

 

----
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
JONES INTERCABLE, INC.


We have audited the  consolidated  balance  sheet of JONES  INTERCABLE,  INC. (a
Colorado  corporation)  and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and the related
consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity  (deficiency) and
cash  flows  for  the  year  then  ended.  These  financial  statements  are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards  require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance   about  whether  the  financial   statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,  the financial  statements  referred to above present fairly, in
all material  respects,  the financial  position of Jones  Intercable,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1999,  and the results of their  operations and
their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with generally  accepted
accounting principles.



                                           /s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Denver, Colorado
  February 18, 2000