alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 27, 2013

h1120

Order 

Clerk

November 27, 2013

147287 & (26)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147287

COA: 315426 

Washtenaw CC: 11-001133-FH

LOVOTNY CEDRIC SHANNON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2013 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for an evidentiary 

hearing is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of On4 Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cameron Robb, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: June 22, 2010





By:       /s/ Cameron Robb


Cameron Robb


President, Chief Executive Officer and


Interim Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 9, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Decentralized Storage Alliance Association (“DSAA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Western Digital Technologies, Inc., San Jose, CA; Curio Storage, Inc., Ethridge, TN; and The Decentralized AI Society (DAIS), Lewes, DE, have been added as parties to this venture.                

                    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research                           ( print page 8817)                        project remains open, and DSAA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.                

                    On August 1, 2023, DSAA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 69670).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 1, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2024 (89 FR 78904).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-02104 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Samantha Deeter CURRIE, Appellant, v. Robert L. COLVIN, individually, Wayne Lung, individually, Michelle Colvin, individually, Gabriel Chavez, individually, Jaime Gonzalez, individually, ACME Plumbing, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and SRW Cooling and Heating, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 1D19-0887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 13, 2019

Samantha Deeter Currie, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *Johnson v. First City Bank of Gainesville* , 491 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (stating that in civil cases, this court has consistently held that an order which grants a motion to dismiss the complaint, but does not actually dismiss the complaint, is not an appealable order and such an order is not a final order).

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 13 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 33
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 13

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment 
      Opportunity Commission relating to ``Update of Commission's 
                       Conciliation Procedures''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2021

 Mrs. Murray introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
 twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

                             March 25, 2021

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment 
      Opportunity Commission relating to ``Update of Commission's 
                       Conciliation Procedures''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relating 
to ``Update of Commission's Conciliation Procedures'' (86 Fed. Reg. 
2974; published January 14, 2021), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

                                                        Calendar No. 33

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 13

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Equal Employment 
      Opportunity Commission relating to ``Update of Commission's 
                       Conciliation Procedures''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 25, 2021

  Committee discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

District of Northern California

On Behalf of PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong Kong 

corporation, by Mabel Mak, and MABEL MAK, an 

individual, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No. 16-CV-07387-KAW

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation, and 

PRAVEEN NARRA KUMAR, an individual, 

Defendants. 

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

Praveen Narra Kumar

2107 Ashley Ridge Court, San Jose, 

California 95138, United States of America

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you 

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, 

whose name and address are:

David Alan Makman

Law Offices of David A. Makman

655 Mariners Island Blvd, Suite 306

San Mateo, CA 94404

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Indyzen, Inc. ("Indyzen")

2033 Gateway Place, San Jose,

California 95110, United States of America

January 3, 2017 Jessie Mosley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Susan Y. Soong

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 7 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2) 

Civil Action No. 

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

 This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) 

was received by me on (date) . 

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) 

 on (date) ; or 

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) 

 , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, 

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is 

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) 

 on (date) ; or 

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or 

Other (specify): 

 . 

 My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ . 

 I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. 

 Date: 

Server’s signature

 

Printed name and title

 

 

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: 

 

16-CV-7387-KAW

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 7 Filed 01/03/17 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 10, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 10, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25I0018. IRBY ALLEN MEADORS v. ERIC LOGAN MCCRACKIN. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 22A01194
BURKE, WILLIAMS &

SORENSEN, LLP 

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

LOS A NG EL ES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LA #4845-5498-7077 v1 - 1 - STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

FRANK E. MAYO / State Bar #42972 

4962 El Camino Real, Suite 104 

Los Altos, CA 94022 

(650) 964-8901 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Christopher Kane 

Daniel W. Maguire (SBN 120002)

E-mail: dmaguire@bwslaw.com 

Keiko J. Kojima (SBN 206595) 

E-mail: kkojima@bwslaw.com 

BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 

444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953 

Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Life Insurance Company of North America 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHRISTOPHER KANE,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CIGNA CORPORATION DBA CIGNA 

INSURANCE GROUP AND LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH 

AMERICA, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 5:17-cv-00010-BLF

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff Christopher Kane and Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America, 

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that this action shall be 

dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to all parties. Each party is to bear her or its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 5:17-cv-00010-BLF Document 19 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 2
BURKE, WILLIAMS &

SORENSEN, LLP 

ATTO RN EY S AT LA W

LO S A NG EL ES

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

LA #4845-5498-7077 v1 - 2 - STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: March 21, 2017 By: /s/ Frank E. Mayo

 [As authorized on March 21, 2017]

Frank E. Mayo 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Christopher Kane 

Dated: March 21, 2017 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP

By: /s/ Keiko J. Kojima

Daniel W. Maguire 

Keiko J. Kojima 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Life Insurance Company of North America 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. The parties will bear their 

own respective attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: By:

 Honorable Beth Labson Freeman 

United States District Court Judge

0DUFK

Case 5:17-cv-00010-BLF Document 19 Filed 03/22/17 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




The
      following certification is provided by each of the undersigned Chief Executive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Royal Financial, Inc. on the basis of
      such officers’ knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2007 (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                      May 15, 2007
                    By:
                    /s/Donald
                      A. Moll
 Name:  Donald
                      A. MollTitle:    President
                      and Chief Executive Officer
 Date:
                            May 15, 2007
                        By:
                        /s/Leonard
                          Szwajkowski
  Name: 
                          Leonard SzwajkowskiTitle:   
                          Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                          Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies
      the Report and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of this
      Report.
Exhibit 10.3

Amendment No. 3 to Note

This Amendment to Note (Amendment), made, delivered, and effective as of August 9, 2007, by and
between QUANTUM VALUE MANAGEMENT, LLC (Borrower) and COMERICA BANK (Bank).

WHEREAS, Borrower and Bank are parties to that
certain Variable Rate  Single Payment Note in the original principal amount of $20,000,000 dated March 10, 2005, as amended (Note); and

WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower desire to amend the Note as set forth below;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the
mutual promises contained in this Amendment, Borrower and Bank agree as follows:



|1. | The Maturity Date of the Note is now April 1, 2009.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------



|2. | The execution of this Amendment shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any Default or Event of Default.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | All the terms used in this Amendment which are defined in the Note shall have the same meaning as used in the Note, unless otherwise defined in this Amendment.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | This Amendment is not an agreement to any further or other amendment of the Note.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Borrower expressly acknowledges and agrees that except as expressly amended in this Amendment, the Note, as amended, remains in full force and effect and is ratified, confirmed and
restated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment on the date set forth above.



|                              |  |                   |  |      |  |                     
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ---- |  | --------------------
|QUANTUM VALUE MANAGEMENT, LLC |  | COMERICA BANK    
|                              |  |                   | 
|By:                           |  | David J. Langevin |  | By:  |  | James Q. Goudie     
|Its:                          |  | Chairman & CEO    |  | Its: |  | Vice President & AGM
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 957 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that 

certain medical facilities of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs have physical locations for the disposal of controlled substances medications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 957 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PERIODS DURING WHICH 

2 ANY INDIVIDUAL MAY DISPOSE OF CON3 TROLLED SUBSTANCES MEDICATIONS AT FA4 CILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VET5 ERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 Section 3009 of the Johnny Isakson and David P. 

7 Roe, M.D. Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improve8 ment Act of 2020 (Public Law 116–315; 38 U.S.C. 8110 

9 note) is amended— 

10 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as 

11 subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and 

12 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol13 lowing new subsection (b): 

14 ‘‘(b) DESIGNATION OF PERIODS FOR ANY INDI15 VIDUAL TO DISPOSE OF MEDICATION.— 

16 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall des17 ignate periods during which any individual may dis18 pose of controlled substances medications at a cov19 ered Department medical facility. 

20 ‘‘(2) PUBLIC INFORMATION CAMPAIGNS.—The 

21 Secretary may carry out public information cam-
3 

†S 957 ES

1 paigns regarding the periods designated under para2 graph (1).’’. 

Passed the Senate April 22, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 957 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to entions. for the disposal of controlled substances medica- ment of Veterans Affairs have physical locations sure that certain medical facilities of the Depart-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RONALD COMBS, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-0831-D

VS. §

 §

LUPE VALDEZ, et al., §

 §

Defendants. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of

the opinion that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct,

and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is therefore ordered that the

findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. 

Accordingly, defendants Kathryn Flangin and Roselyn Mgbakor’s November 10, 2005

motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, and plaintiff’s claims against these defendants in

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00831-D Document 56 Filed 02/09/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 227
*

These defendants earlier filed a motion for immediate appeal that the court denied but that

the clerk of court docketed as a notice of appeal. The record reflects that the clerk of court

transmitted the notice of appeal to the court of appeals on October 13, 2005. This appears to have

been an inadvertent error by the clerk. First, the court can find no indication that defendants filed

a notice of appeal as opposed to a motion to appeal. Second, it does not appear that the court of

appeals docketed the appeal or that these defendants have prosecuted an appeal. Accordingly, the

court discerns no jurisdictional impediment to its acting on defendants’ motion to dismiss and

entering a judgment of dismissal today.

- - 2

their individual capacity are dismissed without prejudice by judgment filed today.*

SO ORDERED.

February 9, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-00831-D Document 56 Filed 02/09/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 228
Case 3:05-cv-00609-H Document 34 Filed 06/29/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 152
Marcus SCARVERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4376

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019.

Marcus Scarvers, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Galindez v. State*, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla. 2007) ; *Dale v. State*, 703 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 1997) ; *Knight v. State*, 6 So.3d 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Pratte v. State*, 946 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; *Steward v. State*, 931 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; *Shortridge v. State*, 884 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Marquis RIDDLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-3195

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is denied.
E.M.B., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-5101

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Wilton Oliver WHITTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3055

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.