alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board

          - [Agency Docket Number: CRCCRRB-2025-0008-N]

# AGENCY:

Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board received 201 pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) related to four civil rights cold case incidents to which the Review Board assigned the unique identifiers 2024-003-032, 2024-003-036, 2024-003-056, and 2024-003-059. NARA proposed seven (7) postponements of disclosure in records related to incident 2024-003-059. NARA did not propose postponements in the other records. On January 24, 2025, the Review Board rejected the proposed postponements and determined that all 201 pages of records should be publicly disclosed in the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. By issuing this notice, the Review Board complies with section 7(c)(4) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that requires the Review Board to publish in the                         **Federal Register**                         its determinations on the disclosure or postponement of records in the Collection no more than 14 days after the date of its decision.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stephannie Oriabure, Chief of Staff, Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, (771) 221-0014,                         *info@coldcaserecords.gov.*

*Authority:*Pub. L. 115-426, 132 Stat. 5489 (44 U.S.C. 2107).                    

Dated: January 30, 2025.

Stephannie Oriabure,

Chief of Staff.

[FR Doc. 2025-02198 Filed 2-3-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-SY-P
**EX99.2**

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection        with the Annual Report of Leopard Capital, Inc. (the        "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,        2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the        "Report"), I, Terry G. Cook, Chief Financial Officer of the        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to        section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)The information        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the        financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:       February 27, 2003By:/s/ Terry G. CookTerry G. CookChief Financial Officer  |
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-91,942-01

EX P ARTE JASON LE E WILS ON, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR07-00049A IN THE 294T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM VAN ZA NDT COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of burg lary of a h ab i t at ion and sentenc ed to twenty y ear s’ imprisonm ent. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Ap plicant alleg es that the Parole Boa rd is wrong ly deter

mining when he will be next revie wed for parole

. Acc ording to Applicant, afte r the Parole Boa rd last denied him rele ase to parole (on April 7, 2020), the Parole Boa rd wrong ly set -o ff h is next parole -re view date for three y ear s. Applicant arg ues that a set-off g rea ter than one y ear canno t b e applied to him beca use he was convicted of second- deg ree felony burg lary of a habitation and not fi rs t-deg ree felony burg lary of

a habitation. See T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E §§ 508.141(g ), 508.149(a) (13); 37 T E X . A D M I N . C O D E 145.12.2

Appl icant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Ex parte Retzlaff

, 135 S.W .3d 45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appr opriate f

orum for f

indings of f

act. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. The trial court shall order the Boa rd of Pardons and Paroles’s Offic e of the Gene ral Counsel to obtain a re sponse from a person with know ledg e of r eleva nt fac ts. I n developing the re cord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3 (d ). I f t h e trial court elec ts to hold a h ea ri ng , it shall deter

mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Appli cant is indige nt and wants to b e repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counse l is appointed or retained, the trial court sha ll imm ediately notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s as to whether Applicant’s burg l ar y of a habitation conviction was for a first or for a second deg ree felony and whether the Parole Boa rd’s set-off was proper . The trial c ourt may make a ny other finding s and conc lusions it deems a ppropriate

. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and co n clusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: De cembe r 9, 2020 Do not publish
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June  30, 2006 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: April 4, 2008  /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Executive Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Desmond C. PARKER

State of Louisiana v. Desmond C. Parker

State of Louisiana v. Desmond C. Parker

NO. 2019-KO-0179

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50911 Conference Calendar

RONALD J. FARRELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ANTONIO SIFUENTES, EL PASO POSTAL INSPECTOR, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CV-142

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Postal Service employee Ronald J. Farrelly appeals from the dismissal of his civil action for failure to state a claim. Farrelly contends that Postal Inspector Antonio Sifuentes was not entitled to qualified immunity; that the district court erred by analyzing his factual allegations separately rather than as a whole; and that the district court erred by applying a heightened pleading standard to his complaint without allowing him leave to amend the complaint.No. 96-50911 -2- Farrelly’s action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Names Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), was precluded by the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA). Rollins v. Marsh , 937 F.2d 134, 138-39 (5th Cir. 1991). Because Farrelly had no Bivens cause of action, the district court did not err by dismissing his complaint. Because Farrelly was notified in Sifuentes’s motion to dismiss of the defects in his complaint he sought to remedy but waited until after the dismissal of his complaint to move for leave to amend, the denial of his motion for leave to amend was not an abuse of discretion. In re Beef Indus. Antitrust Litig. , 600 F.2d 1148, 1162 (5th Cir. 1979). Finally, Farrelly’s motion to supplement his reply brief is DENIED. AFFIRMED.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

RELATED CASE ORDER 

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a 

Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been 

filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned 

to case 

17-cv-00205-HSG Bestway (USA), Inc. v. Sgromo 

I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case 

assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not 

related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case 

for a related case determination. 

Case Title Related Not Related

19-cv-08170-KAW Sgromo v. Scott HSG 

ORDER 

The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the 

initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management 

conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the 

dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. 

Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local 

Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to 

govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned 

judge. 

Dated: 1/22/2020 By: 

 Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

 United States District Judge 

 
2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CLERK’S NOTICE 

The court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related and no 

reassignments shall occur. 

Dated: By: 

Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk
Donald P. BERNAICHE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1847

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

Donald P. Bernaiche, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 11, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132747 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132747 

 COA: 250006 

Oakland CC: 2002-187306-FH 

ALVIN CHARLES WALKER, JR., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

p0404 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 11, 2007 

 Clerk
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Graham R. Hughes, the Chief Financial Officer of Quantum
Solar Power Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

| | By:    |                                       
| | ------ | --------------------------------------
| |        | /s/
      Graham R. Hughes            
| | Name:  | GRAHAM R. HUGHES                      
| |        |                                       
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
| |        | Treasurer                             
| |        |                                       
| | Date:  | February 9, 2011                      



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Graham R. Hughes, the Chief Financial Officer of Quantum
Solar Power Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        



| | By:    | /s/
      Graham R. Hughes                            
| | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                       
| | Name:  | GRAHAM R. HUGHES                                      
| |        |                                                       
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Treasurer
| |        |                                                       
| | Date:  | May
      17, 2010                                    





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 10.1 --  Shareholder Agreement

                          Jeffrey Chad Guidry
                            Address


JCG, Inc.
8425 Bay Point Dr.
Las Vegas, NV 89128

Re:  Shareholder Agreement with JCG, Inc.

Gentlemen:

     In consideration of the sale of the shares of Common Stock of
JCG, Inc. (the "Company") to the undersigned (the "Holder"), the Holder
hereby represents, warrants, covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the
Company and any holders of record (the "third party beneficiaries") of the
Company's outstanding securities, including the Company's Common Stock,
$0.001 par value (the "Stock") at the date hereof and during the pendency
of this letter agreement, that the Holder will not transfer, sell, contract
to sell, devise, gift, assign, pledge, hypothecate, distribute or grant any
option to purchase or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, his
360,000 shares of Stock of the Company owned beneficially or otherwise by
the Holder except in connection with or following completion of a
merger, acquisition or other transaction of or by the Company meeting
the definition of a business combination as defined in the Company's
registration statement on Form 10-SB or otherwise complying with the
purposes of the Company as set out in the registration statement.

     Any attempted sale, transfer or other disposition in violation
of this letter agreement shall be null and void.

     The Holder further agrees that the Company (i) may instruct
its transfer agent not to transfer such securities (ii) may provide
a copy of this letter agreement to the Company's transfer agent for
the purpose of instructing the Company's transfer agent to place a
legend on the certificate(s) evidencing the securities subject
hereto and disclosing that any transfer, sale, contract for sale,
devise, gift, assignment, pledge or hypothecation of such securities
is subject to the terms of this letter agreement and (iii) may issue
stop-transfer instructions to its transfer agent for the period
contemplated by this letter agreement for such securities.

     This letter agreement shall be binding upon the Holder, its
agents, heirs, successors, assigns and beneficiaries.

     Any waiver by the Company of any of the terms and conditions
of this letter agreement in any instance shall be in writing and shall
be duly executed by the Company and the Holder and shall not be deemed
or construed to be a waiver of such term or condition for the future,
or of any subsequent breach thereof.

     Agreed and accepted this 14th day of July 2003.


                                           THE HOLDER


                                      By: /s/ Jeffrey Chad Guidry
                                          ------------------------
                                           Jeffrey Chad Guidry
                                           President




<PAGE>