alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.1





RULE
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








I, Thomas
A. Vento, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of
Pennsylvania (the "Registrant");





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control for financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:  August 14,
      2008
              
              /s/ Thomas
      A. VentoThomas A.
    VentoPresident and Chief Executive
      Officer
Insights from the 

Congressional Watchdog on 

Equity in Evaluation Design

Organizer: Sirin Yaemsiri, Government Accountability Office

Chair: Jared Smith, Government Accountability Office

Discussant: Frances Tirado, Government Accountability Office
Who We Are: The 

Government Watchdog

• The Government Accountability Office (GAO), is 

an independent, nonpartisan agency that advises 

Congress and Agency Heads about ways to make 

government more efficient, effective, ethical, 

equitable, and responsive.
When we talk, others listen

• We work at the request of Congressional committees or as statutorily required

• We usually testify around 100 times per year at Congressional hearings and 

make hundreds of recommendations a year.

• In FY 2021, our work yielded $66.2 billion in financial benefits
Our work 

takes us 

everywhere

• Fraud • International Affairs • Financial Issues • Health Care • Defense and Security • Environment • Infrastructure • Future Technology
Applied Research 

and Methods 

(ARM)

Center for Statistics and Data Analysis

Center for Actuarial Sciences

Center for Design, Methods, and 

Analysis

Center for Library Services

Center for Economics

Center for Evaluation Methods and 

Issues

We design and execute methodologies to 

help GAO’s mission and operations teams 

investigate and improve federal government 

operations. We also routinely assess 

emerging issues and evaluate federal 

programs and policies. 
Yellow Book: 

Framework 

for GAO 

Engagement 

Work

• The Yellow Book outlines how GAO 

uses evidence in our work

• In 2021, the Government Auditing 

Standards “Yellow Book” was 

updated to include evaluating 

whether government services are 

provided equitably, setting a new 

direction for GAO’s work.
GAO Presenters

• Sonya Vartivarian, Geospatial Analysis and Regression Modeling to 

Assess Social and Demographic Disparities in Locations of Lead Water 

Pipes and Pavement Conditions of the National Highway System 

• Lijia Guo, Assessing Disparities in FEMA Flood Map Investments using 

Multivariate Analysis 

• Moon Parks, Survival Analysis Modeling of Promotions in the State 

Department’s Workforce 

• Jeff Tessin, Imputing Race and Ethnicity in Federal Administrative 

Data: Two Applications of Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding 

(BISG) 

• Frances Tirado, Discussant
Audience Reminder

• Please mute your cell phone ringers.

• Hold questions for the Q&A time after all of the presentations have 

been presented.
Exhibit 31.2I, Kristina K. Cashman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: February 15, 2006 /s/ KRISTINA K. CASHMAN   *Chief Financial Officer*      
63
1Anthony J. Principi has been appointed to serve as Secretary of Veterans

Affairs, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

43(c)(2).

2The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3635

___________

Jean A. Gardner, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, * Eastern District of Missouri.

Department of Veterans Affairs,1*

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 22, 2001

 Filed: June 13, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jean A. Gardner, a former employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs

(VA), alleged that the VA discriminated and took adverse employment action against

her on various occasions between 1987 and 1999. The District Court2 granted
-2-

summary judgment for the VA in Gardner’s action alleging age, race, and sex

discrimination and retaliation. Gardner appeals.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the District Court, and because Gardner did not exhaust her

administrative remedies by timely pursuing her administrative complaint. See 29

C.F.R. §§ 1614.105-.106 (administrative requirements); Briley v. Carlin, 172 F.3d 567,

571 (8th Cir. 1999) (holding that "an employee cannot bring a discrimination claim

without first exhausting his or her administrative remedies"); McAlister v. Sec'y of

Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 900 F.2d 157, 158 (8th Cir. 1990)

("[A]dministrative remedies must be exhausted before a federal employee may bring

an employment discrimination claim against federal employer.").

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 3:05-cv-01961-H Document 12 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 55
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terra Firma Technologies,  Inc. f/k/a
Highriver Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Kawamura, President of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: July 30, 2007                               By: /s/ Brian Kawamura
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Brian Kawamura
                                                     President and Director


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Terra Firma Technologies, Inc. f/k/a Highriver Acquisition Corp. and
will be retained by Terra Firma Technologies,  Inc. f/k/a Highriver  Acquisition
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
Robert Emory TORRENCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3687

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 21, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6053

THOMAS MONIQUE BRADDY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ERIC WILSON, Warden, CEO; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX LOW 

PETERSBURG; BUREAU OF PRISONS, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:14-cv-00606-HEH)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Monique Braddy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland 

Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Monique Braddy, Jr., appeals the district 

court’s order dismissing his breach of contract suit as 

frivolous and as barred by Appellees’ sovereign immunity. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Braddy v. Wilson, No. 3:14-cv-00606-HEH (E.D. Va. Dec. 

19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Statement on Badgerland Financial’s Investment Request

Kenneth A. Spearman, Board Member

November 22, 2013

Mission-related investments are allowed under the investment authorities of the Farm Credit Act 

of 1971. These investments also help fulfill one of Congress’ stated objectives “to provide for an 

adequate and flexible flow of money into rural areas.” Farm Credit System mission-related

investments have proven to be important resources in rural community economic development 

and for start-up capital for agriculture-related business. I believe these activities are appropriate 

for Farm Credit System institutions to engage in by helping to improve the well-being of, and 

create opportunities in, the rural communities where the farmer- and rancher-owners of the 

System institutions live.

The staff at FCA continues to do a good job of ensuring that Farm Credit System investments 

are appropriate and focused. As we consider future mission-related investment requests from 

the Farm Credit System, my attention will be on investments that focus on specific rural 

community development, and businesses and industries to create jobs in rural communities. Of 

course, Farm Credit System investments should never interfere with the System’s core mission 

of meeting the credit needs of all creditworthy borrowers and must be safe and sound.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2196

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, Petitioner, versus ALVIN MINOR; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (02-850) Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: December 15, 2004 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition for review denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher R. Hedrick, MASON, MASON, WALKER & HEDRICK, P.C., Newport News, Virginia, for Petitioner. John H. Klein, MONTAGNA BREIT KLEIN CAMDEN, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Respondent Minor. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s finding that Alvin Minor was entitled to an additional permanent partial disability rating of six percent pursuant to § 8(c) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. SeeNewport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Minor , BRB No. 02-0850 (BRB Aug. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The petition for review is accordingly DENIED .
Case 3:05-cv-02060-R Document 2 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 84
Case 3:05-cv-02060-R Document 2 Filed 10/18/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 85
Edmund MANCHESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2063

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 29, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 70 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 70

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
  Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 
Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status 
            for the Southern Distinct Population Segment''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 21, 2022

  Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Moran, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Inhofe) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 
 Wildlife Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 
  Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 
Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status 
            for the Southern Distinct Population Segment''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service relating to ``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 
Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule for 
the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered Status for the 
Southern Distinct Population Segment'' (87 Fed. Reg. 72674 (November 
25, 2022)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ralph Hamers, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of ING Groep N.V.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

(d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 29, 2016