alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Financial Condition

June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

(unaudited)

June 30

2009

December 31

2008

Assets

 Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 285,080,886 $ 61,991,616

 Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 2,628,032,854 2,588,889,577

 Accrued Interest Receivable 23,695,412 21,061,643

 Premiums Receivable 172,782,000 242,970,000

Total Assets $ 3,109,591,152 $ 2,914,912,836

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 244,794 $ 289,863

 Farm Credit Insurance Fund

 Allocated Insurance Reserve Accounts 39,888,431 39,888,431

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 3,069,457,927 2,874,734,542

 Total Insurance Fund 3,109,346,358 2,914,622,973

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 3,109,591,152 $ 2,914,912,836
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Revenue and Expense

For the Period Ended June 30, 2009

(unaudited)

Calendar Year To Date

June 30, 2009

Income

 Premiums $ 172,782,000

 Interest Income on Investments 23,395,675

 Loss on Disposition of Investments (4,408)

Total Income $ 196,173,267

Expenses

 Administrative Operating Expenses $ 1,449,881

Total Expenses $ 1,449,881

Net Income $ 194,723,386
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of
Pennsylvania (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





                                    /s/
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    NAME: THOMAS A. VENTO
                                    TITLE: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


DATE:  MARCH 11, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania
and will be retained by Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

ADALBERTO CONTRERAS OROZCO, §

§

Petitioner, §

§ 

vs. § Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-043-R

§

WARDEN FCI SEAGOVILLE, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson filed Findings, Conclusions and a

Recommendation in this case on February 28, 2006. No objections were filed. The Court has

reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§636(b) for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS those findings as the findings of this

Court. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED: July 6, 2006.

___________________________________

JUDGE JERRY BUCHMEYER

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

FILED

July 6, 2006

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00043-O Document 8 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 64
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Duro  Enzyme  Products Inc. wholly owns and operates the following subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


COMPANY                     STATE/PROVINCE OF INCORPORATION  DATE OF INCORPORATION
--------------------------  -------------------------------  ---------------------
<S>                         <C>                              <C>

Duro Enzyme Solutions Inc.  Nevada                           September 6, 2000
--------------------------  -------------------------------  ---------------------
Duro Enzyme Solutions Inc.  Canadian Corporation             August 10, 2000
--------------------------  -------------------------------  ---------------------
Home.web Sub. Inc.          Nevada                           November 1, 2000
--------------------------  -------------------------------  ---------------------
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
NO. 12-14003S2-CR

STATE OF TEXAS

DAVID LYNN SELLERS

§ INTHE

§

§ 12th COURT

§

§ OF APPEALS

VS.

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes David Lynn Sellers, Appellant in the above styled and

numbered case, before the decision in this Court has been delivered, and

respectfully moves this Court to withdraw appellant's notice of appeal and dismiss

this appeal, pursuant to Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Appellant has signed a letter of his intent to dismiss the appeal, and has sworn

under oath in the 392ND Judicial District Court his desire to no longer appeal.

The letter indicating that the Appellant no longer wishes to pursue appeal is

attached hereto.

Respectfully submitted,

CHRlSTOPHER D TINSLEY PC

PO Box 832

115 BE. Tyler

Athens, Texas 75751

Tel: (903) 677-1802

Fax: (903)677-1850

ACCEPTED

12-1400352-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

1/14/2015 11:06:40 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/14/2015 11:06:40 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
chris@tinsleypc.com

Attorney for David Lynn Sellers

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on January 13, 2015, a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office,

Henderson County, Texas, by facsimile.
STATE OF TEXAS §

§

COUNTY OF HENDERSON §

AFFIDAVIT

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared

Christopher D. Tinsley, who after being duly sworn stated:

"I am the attorney for the appellant in the above numbered and

entitled cause. I have read the foregoing Motion to Dismiss Appeal

and swear that all of the allegations of fact contained therein are true

and correct."

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on~fUJ..OJU1 1#-,

2015, to certi fy which witness my hand and seal of office.

Notary Public,
CHRISTOPHER D. TINSLEY, P.C.

AlTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW

117 E.'Jyler • P.O. Box 750 • Athens, Texas 75751

PHONE: 903~677-1802 • FAX: 903~677-1850

January 7,2015

Re: Case No: 12-1400352-CR,12-14-00353-CR

Style: David Lynn Sellers

v.

The State of Texas

I, David Lynn Sellers hereby authorize Christopher D. Tinsley to dismiss my pending appeals Case

No: 12-1400352-CR, 12-14-00353-CR, in the Twelfth Court of Appeals. I no longer wish to pursue

an appeal of my convictions regarding Case No: 12-l400352-CR, 12-14-00353-CR, in the 392nd

Judicial District Court, Henderson County, Texas.

_6..::;..~_--=--~'-'<.~~__ Date I ~ J~; J5'

David Lynn Sellers
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7007

GARY W. SKEEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; MICHAEL W. MOORE,

Director, SCDC; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney

General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-98-233-18-AJ)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary W. Skeen, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary W. Skeen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Skeen v. South Carolina, No. CA-98-233-18-AJ

(D.S.C. June 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 958 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.958

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to expand the allowable use 
   criteria for new access points grants for community health centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Maximizing Outcomes through Better 
Investments in Lifesaving Equipment for (MOBILE) Health Care Act''.
SEC. 2. NEW ACCESS POINTS GRANTS.
    (a) In General.--Section 330(e)(6)(A) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(e)(6)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                ``(v) Mobile units.--An existing health center may be 
            awarded funds under clause (i) to establish a new delivery 
            site that is a mobile unit, regardless of whether the 
            applicant additionally proposes to establish a permanent, 
            full-time site. In the case of a health center that is not 
            currently receiving funds under this section, such health 
            center may be awarded funds under clause (i) to establish a 
            new delivery site that is a mobile unit only if such health 
            center uses a portion of such funds to also establish a 
            permanent, full-time site.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 1, 2024.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Case 2:06-cv-00040-J Document 6 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 51
STATE of Louisiana v. Nathaniel BRYANT

NO. 2019-KK-0471

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41512

Conference Calendar

 

ANTONIO JULIO ALVAREZ, ET AL., 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

JOSE JESUS ECHEGOLLEN-BARRUETA, 

 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 

versus 

 

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH; DOES 1 THRU 9; UNITED

STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; DOES 1 - 15, 

 Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CV-627

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Jesus Echegollen-Barrueta (Echegollen), federal inmate

# 31871-048, appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his

complaint against the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB)

and “Doe” defendants for failure to perfect timely service on any

of the named defendants. Because Echegollen’s brief wholly fails
No. 04-41512

-2-

to address the basis of the district court’s dismissal of his

complaint, he has waived any argument regarding his failure to

serve the defendants. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25

(5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,

813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

AFFIRMED.
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.198 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 (the “Amendment”), made as of this 1st day of January, 2003 (the “Effective Date”), by and between PPD
Development, LP (“PPD Development”) and W. Richard Staub (“Employee”), amends that certain Employment Agreement dated May 1, 2002 between PPD Development and Employee, as heretofore amended (the “Employment Agreement”).

  
 FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual promises, covenants and
conditions contained herein, and other good and valid consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment to Section 4. The first sentence of Section 4 of the
Employment Agreement is hereby stricken and replaced in full by the following: “Employee shall have overall responsibility for business development of (a) PPD Development and all of its subsidiaries except Pharmaco Investments, Inc., (b) PPD
Global Ltd. (other than its informatics business), (c) Leicester Clinical Research Centre Ltd., (d) ProPharma Pte Ltd, (e) ProPharma Asia Ltd and (f) ProPharma CRO Pty Ltd (collectively, the “Businesses”). 
  
 2. New Appendix I. All references to Appendix I in the
Employment Agreement shall be deemed to refer to Appendix I attached to this Amendment. 
  
 3. Binding Effect. The Employment Agreement, as herein amended, shall continue in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  

	 PPD DEVELOPMENT, LP
	 	 
	 By: PPD GP, LLC, its general partner
	 	 
			
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Fred B. Davenport, Jr.

	 	 
	 Name:
	 	 Fred B. Davenport, Jr.
	 	 
	 Title:
	 	 Vice President
	 	 
		
	 /s/ W. Richard Staub

	 	 (SEAL)

	 W. Richard Staub
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report of IroncladPerformance Wear Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey Cordes, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

 

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey Cordes

Jeffrey Cordes

Principal Executive Officer

May 11, 2015
Tony R. NAVARRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4966

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 12, 2019

Tony R. Navarro, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 16, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1261 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1080, K2025-1079.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-00904 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
L.C.M. and J.K. v. SHELBY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160769

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate
                              ---------------------

                                 March 30, 2004



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

                          ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Kevin Cremin, Vice-President-Business Manager of The Bank of
New York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such
capacity that, based on his/her knowledge, the Trustee is in compliance with all
conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard Terms for
Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc.
as depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as successor to United States
Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the
"Securities Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a series supplement
between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each
trust series listed in the attached schedule.



<PAGE>




                                Very truly yours,

                                BANK OF NEW YORK


                                By: /s/ Kevin Cremin
                                    --------------------
                                Name: Kevin Cremin
                                Title: Vice President


<PAGE>

                                   SCHEDULE

INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1
PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
PPLUS Trust Series DCC-1
PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2
PPLUS Trust Series HTZ-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 F-Z4 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 H-Z3 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 IBM-Z2 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOSE SILVINO ENRIQUEZ §

§

Petitioner, §

§

VS. §

§ NO. 3-05-CV-2191-K

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are

correct and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court. 

SO ORDERED this 6th day of March , 2006.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02191-K Document 14 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 114
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ZERA P. SUMMERS, JR., Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0149 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2013-416358-001

The Honorable William L. Brotherton, Judge, Retired

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Daniel Strange

Counsel for Respondent

Zera P. Summers, Jr., Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Maria Elena Cruz, and Chief 

Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 1-23-2018
STATE v. SUMMERS

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Zera P. Summers, Jr., seeks review of the superior 

court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's first 

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
Kelli Jo CONE v. Jonathan Wayne CONE

2160978

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 16, 2018

Affirmed.
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 2 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 3 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 4 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 5 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 6 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 7 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 8 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 9 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 10 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 11 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 12 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 13 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 14 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 15 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 16 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 17 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 18 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 19 of 20
Case 5:16-mc-80271-HRL Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 20 of 20
EX PARTE Baily Nicole CANNON

(In re: Benjamin Miles Cannon v. Baily Nichole Cannon)

2170608

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 27, 2018

Mand. pet. denied.