alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 16 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 16

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
     Exchange Commission relating to ``Procedural Requirements and 
        Resubmission Thresholds Under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2021

  Mr. Brown introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and 
     Exchange Commission relating to ``Procedural Requirements and 
        Resubmission Thresholds Under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to 
``Procedural Requirements and Resubmission Thresholds Under Exchange 
Act Rule 14a-8'' (85 Fed. Reg. 70240 (November 4, 2020)), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 02 3

- 1 098

_____________________________
U LRIC N OVELOZO , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman L. Robinson
, Judge

. August 29, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R O WE , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 J ason Cromey of Cromey Law, P.A., Pensacola
, for Appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General
, and Virginia Chester Harris, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WILLIAM T. MASON, )

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:06-CV-0047-K

) ECF

RUIZ PROTECTIVE SERVICES, )

et al., )

Defendants. )

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Appeal and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in

the above captioned case. 

(X) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be GRANTED.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

( ) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED for

the following reasons:

( ) The plaintiff is not a pauper.

( ) The plaintiff has not complied with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. §

1915(a)(1). 

( ) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court should certify that the appeal

is not taken in good faith.

If the Court denies the motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, plaintiff

may challenge such denial by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth

Circuit, within thirty days after service of the notice required by Fed. R. App. P.

24(a)(4). See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).

SIGNED this 29th day of July, 2008.

 ___________________________________

 IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IN RE: Kimberly Elizabeth DEBROCK

NO. 2019-B-0370

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Respondent was arrested and charged with felony possession of a Schedule II controlled dangerous substance, misdemeanor theft, and misdemeanor illegal possession of stolen things. She thereafter pleaded guilty to theft under $ 1,000 and was placed on misdemeanor probation. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that *190respondent violated Rules 8.4(a) and 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Kimberly Elizabeth DeBrock, Louisiana Bar Roll number 34275, be and she hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. It is further ordered that this suspension shall be deferred in its entirety and that respondent shall be placed on probation for a period to coincide with the term of her recovery agreement with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. Any failure of respondent to comply with the terms of the agreement may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
# Withdrawal of Certain Areas of the United States Outer Continental Shelf From Oil and Natural Gas Leasing

# Memorandum for the Secretary of the Interior

Consistent with principles of responsible public stewardship, and with due consideration of the irreplaceable marine and coastal environments, including wildlife and wildlife habitat, of the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic, and Pacific areas of the Outer Continental Shelf; and independently with due consideration of the vulnerability of these ecosystems and coastal communities, where limited or no oil and natural gas development has yet occurred, to oil spills; and independently with due consideration of the benefits of expeditious and orderly development of the vital renewable energy resources of the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic, and Pacific areas of the Outer Continental Shelf; and independently with due consideration of the national need to curtail, mitigate, build resilience against, and adapt to the devastating and irreversible consequences of climate change for the human environment and for the marine and coastal environments, I hereby direct as follows:

Under the authority granted to me in section 12(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 1341(a), I hereby withdraw from disposition by oil or natural gas leasing for a time period without specific expiration:

(a) the areas designated by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management as the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida Planning Areas of the Outer Continental Shelf;

(b) the areas of the Outer Continental Shelf designated by section 104(a) of the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-432); and

(c) the areas designated by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management as the Washington/Oregon, Northern California, Central California, and Southern California Planning Areas of the Outer Continental Shelf.

The boundaries of the withdrawn areas are more specifically delineated in the attached map. The map forms a part of this memorandum. The withdrawal directed by this memorandum prevents consideration of withdrawn areas for any future oil or natural gas leasing for purposes of exploration, development, or production.

Nothing in this withdrawal affects rights under existing leases in the withdrawn areas.





Billing code 3395-F4-P [FR Doc. 2025-01464 Billing code 4310-10-C
Exhibit 48

To Declaration of Jarad Brown in Support of 

Federal Trade Commission’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 178-50 Filed 09/21/18 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. 17-cv-0038 NC

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

EMILE S. NIJMEH, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00703 NC

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 

DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. 31

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

no issue remains for the Court’s determination,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are

DISMISSED with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not reached, any party may

move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed by December 20, 2017. All 

scheduled dates are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 23, 2017, _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge
Melvin GREEN v. Melanie GREEN

2160878

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 2018

Affirmed.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 28, 2025 / Presidential Documents 8245 

Memorandum of January 20, 2025 

Delivering Emergency Price Relief for American Families and 

Defeating the Cost-of-Living Crisis 

Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies 

Over the past 4 years, the Biden Administration’s destructive policies inflicted an historic inflation crisis on the American people. The Biden Administration not only exploded Government spending, artificially and 

unsustainably stimulating demand, but it simultaneously made necessary 

goods and services scarce through a crushing regulatory burden and radical 

policies designed to weaken American production. Hardworking families 

today are overwhelmed by the cost of fuel, food, housing, automobiles, 

medical care, utilities, and insurance. 

In particular, the assault on plentiful and reliable American energy through 

unnecessary and illegal regulatory demands has driven up the cost of transportation and manufacturing. In addition, the unlawful regulatory mandate 

on companies to effectively eliminate many or most gas-powered vehicles 

has resulted in artificial price increases on those popular vehicles to subsidize 

electric vehicles disfavored by consumers. 

Moreover, many Americans are unable to purchase homes due to historically 

high prices, in part due to regulatory requirements that alone account for 

25 percent of the cost of constructing a new home according to recent 

analysis. 

In sum, unprecedented regulatory oppression from the Biden Administration 

is estimated to have imposed almost $50,000 in costs on the average American 

household, whereas my first-term agenda reduced regulatory costs by almost 

$11,000 per household. It is critical to restore purchasing power to the 

American family and improve our quality of life. 

I hereby order the heads of all executive departments and agencies to deliver 

emergency price relief, consistent with applicable law, to the American 

people and increase the prosperity of the American worker. This shall include 

pursuing appropriate actions to: lower the cost of housing and expand 

housing supply; eliminate unnecessary administrative expenses and rentseeking practices that increase healthcare costs; eliminate counterproductive 

requirements that raise the costs of home appliances; create employment 

opportunities for American workers, including drawing discouraged workers 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O0
8246 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 28, 2025 / Presidential Documents 

into the labor force; and eliminate harmful, coercive ‘‘climate’’ policies 

that increase the costs of food and fuel. Within 30 days of the date of 

this memorandum, the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy shall 

report to me and every 30 days thereafter, on the status of the implementation 

of this memorandum. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 20, 2025 

[FR Doc. 2025–01904 

Filed 1–27–25; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O0Trump.EPS</GPH>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                        
                          GALILEO INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                           Schedule of Subsidiaries
                                        

Name of Subsidiary                                    Country
------------------                                    -------

Galileo International, L.L.C.                         United States

Apollo Travel Services Partnership                    United States

The Galileo Company                                   United Kingdom

Galileo International Limited                         United Kingdom

Galileo Belgium SA/NV                                 Belgium

Galileo France SARL                                   France

Galileo Deutschland GmbH                              Germany

Galileo International B.V.                            The Netherlands

Galileo Nederland B.V.                                The Netherlands

Galileo Portugal Limited                              Portugal

Galileo Espana SA                                     Spain

Galileo Technologies, Inc.                            United States

Galileo Switzerland                                   Switzerland

Galileo Asia Limited                                  Hong Kong

Galileo Brasil Limited                                Brazil

Galileo do Brasil & CIA                               Brazil

Galileo Latin America, L.L.C.                         United States

Galileo Venezuela C.A.                                Venezuela

Apollo Communication Services, L.L.C.                 United States

CCRM L.L.C.                                           United States

Apollo Travel Services Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.     Mexico

ATS Sub I, Inc.                                       United States

ATS Sub II, Inc.                                      United States
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51366 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS HERNANDEZ-CORONA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-333-ALL-AML

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Carlos Hernandez-Corona appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Hernandez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Hernandez maintains that he pleadedNo. 02-51366 -2- guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Hernandez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-8   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-8   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-8   Filed 12/14/17   Page 3 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-8   Filed 12/14/17   Page 4 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-8   Filed 12/14/17   Page 5 of 5
Case 3:05-cv-01737-M Document 22 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID 115
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01737-M Document 22 Filed 02/03/06 Page 2 of 8 PageID 116
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01737-M Document 22 Filed 02/03/06 Page 3 of 8 PageID 117
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01737-M Document 22 Filed 02/03/06 Page 4 of 8 PageID 118
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01737-M Document 22 Filed 02/03/06 Page 5 of 8 PageID 119
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01737-M Document 22 Filed 02/03/06 Page 6 of 8 PageID 120
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01737-M Document 22 Filed 02/03/06 Page 7 of 8 PageID 121
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01737-M Document 22 Filed 02/03/06 Page 8 of 8 PageID 122
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m., Thursday, February 13, 2025.

      ( print page 8526)    

# PLACE: 

You may observe this meeting in person at 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to observe, at least 24 hours in advance, visit FCA.gov, select “Newsroom,” then select “Events.” From there, access the linked “Instructions for board meeting visitors” and complete the described registration process.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The following matters will be considered:
      - Approval of Minutes for January 8, 2025
      - Regulatory Burden Final Notice

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

If you need more information or assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-4056.

Ashley Waldron,

Secretary to the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2025-02046 Filed 1-28-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Krishna SWAMY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-304

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 02, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Scott D. Scheid, the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Registrant,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of Scheid Vineyards Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))****and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosuresand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period coveredby this report based upon such evaluation; and

 

c)disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing equivalentfunctions):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

----

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| * * | */s/ Scott D. Scheid*                 | * * |
|----------|---------------------------------------|----------|
|     | Scott D. Scheid                       |
|     | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|     | April 7, 2006                         |

 

----