# C_2017300EN.01001901.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 30 June 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Freddy Lucien Magdalena Kirschstein, Thierry Frans Adeline Kirschstein

(Case C-393/17)

(2017/C 300/23)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Openbaar Ministerie

Appellant:

Respondents: Freddy Lucien Magdalena Kirschstein, Thierry Frans Adeline Kirschstein

Respondents:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Directive 2005/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market be interpreted as precluding the provision in Article II.75(6) of the Codex of Higher Education of 11 October 2013 which imposes a general prohibition on non-accredited educational institutions using the designation ‘master’ on the diplomas they award, where that prohibition is aimed at safeguarding a matter in the general interest, namely, the need to ensure a high standard of education whereby it must be possible to check whether the predefined quality requirements have effectively been met? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Directive 2005/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market be interpreted as precluding the provision in Article II.75(6) of the Codex of Higher Education of 11 October 2013 which imposes a general prohibition on non-accredited educational institutions using the designation ‘master’ on the diplomas they award, where that prohibition is aimed at safeguarding a matter in the general interest, namely, the need to ensure a high standard of education whereby it must be possible to check whether the predefined quality requirements have effectively been met?

1

| 2. | Must Directive 2006/123/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market be interpreted as precluding the provision in Article II.75(6) of the Codex of Higher Education of 11 October 2013, which imposes a general prohibition on non-accredited educational institutions using the designation ‘master’ on the diplomas they award, where that prohibition is aimed at safeguarding a matter in the general interest, namely the protection of recipients of services? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Directive 2006/123/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market be interpreted as precluding the provision in Article II.75(6) of the Codex of Higher Education of 11 October 2013, which imposes a general prohibition on non-accredited educational institutions using the designation ‘master’ on the diplomas they award, where that prohibition is aimed at safeguarding a matter in the general interest, namely the protection of recipients of services?

2

| 3. | Does the criminal provision applicable to educational institutions not recognised by the Flemish Government which award ‘masters’’ diplomas pass the proportionality test in Articles 9(1)(c) and 10(2)(c) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the criminal provision applicable to educational institutions not recognised by the Flemish Government which award ‘masters’’ diplomas pass the proportionality test in Articles 9(1)(c) and 10(2)(c) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market?

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22.

1

(2)  OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36.

2

---