alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CuraTech Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Lincoln M. Dastrup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











Lincoln
      M. Dastrup


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      18, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF
EDUCATION REALTY LIMITED PARTNER, LLC
 Amendment Company Effective
Date Manager
 RECITALS:
 WHEREAS, Del. C. et seq. Act
 WHEREAS EDR
 WHEREAS Partnership
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS Agreement
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
   Company Expenses




---



##### 



REIT Common Share
    Entire Agreement
    The Signature Page Follows
 2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 EDUCATION REALTY OP GP, INC.By:

/s/
Paul O. BowerIts:
    PresidentPaul Bower
Thomas Hickey
William Harris
Randall Brown
Craig Cardwell
Wallace Wilcox
Drew Koester
Susan Arrison
Tom Trubiana
Kelly Bollinger
Jim Crossetti
Joel Dixon
Charles Harris
Mark Joyce
Viktoriya Kumok
Maureen Lannon
Giles Palo
Christine Richards
Dan Sampietro
Brad Shaw
Stephen Woo
Susan Rosenbaum Koehn
L. Watson
D. Braden
F. Witt
M. White
Bill Bugg
Mike Burtoldo
Olan Brevard
Allen Saylor
Kay Alexander
Scott Casey
Jim Doss
Ken Ellington
Matt MillsBy:
    EDUCATION REALTY OP GP, INC.By:
    /s/
Paul O. BowerIts:
    PresidentAs Attorney-in-Fact for the Members pursuant to
Section 12.1 of the Agreement
MIAMI DADE COUNTY MRI CORP., etc., Petitioner, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 3D19-354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., and Chad A. Barr (Altamonte Springs), for petitioner.

Michael J. Neimand, for respondent.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.

*CONFESSION OF ERROR*

HENDON, J.

Miami Dade County MRI Corporation petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari, seeking to quash the following order entered by the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity: (1) an order granting United Automobile Insurance Company's motion for attorney's fees, and (2) an order denying Miami Dade County MRI Corporation's motion for attorney's fees under sections 627.428(1) and 627.736(8) of the Florida Statutes. Based on United Automobile Insurance Company's proper confession of error, we grant the petition, quash the orders under review, and remand for the entry of an order granting Miami Dade County MRI Corporation's motion for appellate attorney's fees filed under sections 627.428(1) and 627.736(8).

Petition granted; orders quashed; and remanded with directions.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 25, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles G. Raymond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ CHARLES G. RAYMOND                                             
|Charles G. Raymond                                                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

April 26, 2007
B.V. v. W.R.C. and L.C.

2160477

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018 Reh. denied March 16, 2018

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7311

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ORLANDO LORENZO ANDERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-99-86, CA-01-132-7) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orlando Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce A. Pagel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Orlando Anderson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Anderson , Nos. CR-99-86; CA-01-132-7 (W.D. Va. filed July 6, 2001; entered July 9, 2001).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 30,075.

#### The State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. D. L. Smith, *Appellant.*

(3 P. 2d 487.)

Opinion filed October 10, 1931.

*George McGill, H. C. Castor*and *V. J. Rogers,*all of Wichita, for the appellant.

*Roland Boynton,*attorney-general, *R. C. Woodward,*county attorney, *Stanley Taylor*and *C. G. Morris,*both of Wichita, for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny for the theft of a quantity of oil-well casing. He appeals, assigning errors which center about what he regards as the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

The main features of the state’s evidence were to this effect: One G. L. Ramsey owned a quantity of 6%-inch casing which was stored on a tract of land in Butler county known as the Plummer lease. One S. W. Forrester was engaged in drilling an oil well on a tract of land in Cowley county known as the Countryman lease, some thirty miles from the Plummer lease. Forrester needed some 6%-inch casing, and defendant Smith, who dealt in secondhand supplies for oil and gas wells, agreed to furnish it. Shortly thereafter Smith hired a truck driver to go to the Plummer lease and get the casing. The truck driver did so and delivered it at the Countryman lease. Defendant Smith told the truck driver that if anybody should ask who hired him to haul the pipe to say that a Mr. Wilson did. The truck driver testified that he knew Smith’s right name, as he had previously done business with him. The day after the stolen pipe was delivered defendant called on Forrester and said he would like to be paid for the casing within a few days. Some days later Forrester saw defendant, but ere then defendant had been arrested for the theft of the casing, and Forrester told him he would not pay for it until he learned to whom it belonged.

*766Some details of the state’s evidence which included significant discrepancies in defendant’s statements touching his own whereabouts at and about the time the larceny was committed and other incidents of slight probative value need not be set down here. A skillful defense developed some minor weaknesses in the state’s case against the defendant, and emphasis is now placed on the fact that the state’s evidence, in part, was circumstantial. Be that as it may, there is no analogy between this case and that of *State v. Moskowitz,*115 Kan. 485, 223 Pac. 279, where this court was constrained to hold that there was no evidence of any sort to support the charge. Here this court has no hesitancy in declaring that the evidence briefly summarized above was quite sufficient to require its submission to a jury and to forbid us to disturb that jury’s verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 4, 2008  /s/ Cosmo PalmieriChief Executive Officer
David WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1461

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**REBECCA MCGARRY AND PETER**

**MCGARRY W/H**

**v.**

**PHILLY ROCK CORP. AND PRG**
**CLIMBING CENTER, INC. AND PHILADELPHIA ROCK GYM, INC. AND**  **PRG HOLDINGS, INC.**

**PETITION OF: REBECCA MCGARRY :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 846 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Donohue and Justice Wecht did not participate in t he consideration or** 

**decision of this matter.**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRYL CARTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

RASIER-CA, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00003-HSG 

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO 

PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA 

PAUPERIS

Re: Dkt. No. 47

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is 

hereby GRANTED. This case remains closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

______________________________________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

8/22/2018
Jason Rudy CHELADYN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4709

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 29, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and J. L. Perez, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bilal Ahmed Faruqui, Assistant Attorney General, and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
James Edward MCNAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3405

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

Statement of Financial Condition 

September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 

(Unaudited) 

September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014 

Assets 

Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 101,029,247 $ 135,176,196 

Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 3,653,275,218 3,378,139,114 

Accrued Interest Receivable 16,726,992 13,523,766 

Premium Receivable 192,628,307 223,258,000 

Other Receivables - -

Total Assets $ 3,963,659,764 $ 3,750,097,076 

Liabilities and Insurance Fund 

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 326,139 $ 348,566 

Farm Credit Insurance Fund 

Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 3,963,333,625 $ 3,749,748,510 

Total Insurance Fund $ 3,963,333,625 $ 3,749,748,510 

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 3,963,659,764 $ 3,750,097,076 

Attachment 1 
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation
 

Statement of Revenue and Expense
 

Period Ended September 30, 2015
 

(Unaudited)
 

Calendar Year to Date Calendar Year to Date 

September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 

Income 

Premiums $ 192,611,307 $ 162,778,000 

Interest Income on Investments 23,523,367 27,287,470 

Total Income $ 216,134,674 $ 190,065,470 

Expenses 

Administrative Operating Expenses $ 2,549,559 $ 2,375,267 

Total Expenses $ 2,549,559 $ 2,375,267 

Net Income $ 213,585,115 $ 187,690,203 

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund 

Period Ended September 30, 2015 

(Unaudited Financial Statements) 

Balance at January 1, 2015 $ 3,749,748,510 

Net Income 213,585,115 

Balance at September 30, 2015 $ 3,963,333,625 

Attachment 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Optionable,  Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  July 25, 2005                               /s/ Edward O'Connor
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Edward O'Connor
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Optionable,  Inc.  and will be retained by  Optionable,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORPORATION**
**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Gary N. Monda, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Interstate Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
May 12, 2005     BY: /s/ Gary N. Monda       Gary N. Monda   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 19, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-592

Lower Tribunal No. 15-8342

________________

Dr. James Eric McDonough,

Appellant,

vs.

Alejandro Murguido,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes 

Simon, Judge.

Dr. James Eric McDonough, in proper person.

Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Eric L. Stettin (Fort 

Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. Albanese Popkin Hughes Cove, Inc. v. Scharlin, 141 So. 3d 

743, 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“A trial court’s award of costs is reviewed by 

appellate courts for an abuse of discretion.”); In re Amends. to Unif. 

Guidelines for Tax’n of Costs, 915 So. 2d 612, 616 (Fla. 2005) (stating that 

the test for awarding costs is whether “all requested costs were reasonably 

necessary either to defend or prosecute the case at the time the action 

precipitating the cost was taken.”); Markowski v. N. Broward Hosp. Dist., 894 

So. 2d 1077, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (allowing the “taxation of costs for 

depositions ‘used to successfully support a Motion for Summary Judgment’” 

pursuant to the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs (quoting 

Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So. 2d 1346, 1349 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 

1983))).
Paul William CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CAUSIN, L.L.C., d/b/a Bayou Safety and Supply v. PACE SAFETY CONSULTANTS, LLC and Jay R. Baker

NO. 2019-C-0466

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant and docket.

WEIMER, J., would grant and docket.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket.
Exhibit 32.1

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                                                                                    
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in the Report.

|                         | PACIFIC COAST NATIONAL BANCORP
|------------------------ | ------------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2007 | By:                           
|Dated: November 14, 2007 | By:
Louis REED Jr., Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW and Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Appellees.

No. 1D19-0365

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

# AGENCY:

Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of Finding.

# SUMMARY:

On January 23, 2025, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security signed a Finding of Mass Influx of Aliens. The text of the Finding is set out below.

Joseph N. Mazzara,

Acting General Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

      ( print page 8400)          ( print page 8401)          ( print page 8402)          ( print page 8403)    

BILLING CODE 9110-9M-P

[FR Doc. 2025-01921 Filed 1-24-25; 4:45 pm]

BILLING CODE 9110-9M-C
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00375-CR

Gerald James Hon

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 221st District Court

of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-03-03557-CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 17, 2018
M.G. v. DEKALB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2170246

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 19, 2018

Dismissed.