alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 50 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 50

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2022

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Government of Egypt is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 20-81, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on February 16, 2021: up to one hundred 
        sixty-eight (168) RIM-116C Rolling Airframe Missiles (RAM) 
        Block 2 tactical missiles; RAM Guided Missile Round Pack Tri-
        Pack shipping and storage containers; operator manuals and 
        technical documentation; U.S. Government and contractor 
        engineering, technical and logistics support services; and 
        other related elements of logistical and program support.
            (2) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 21-0M, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on May 26, 2022:
                    (A) The following Major Defense Equipment (MDE): 
                four (4) MK 49 MOD 5 RAM Guided Missile Launching 
                Systems (GMLS) (MDE).
                    (B) The following non-MOE: support equipment; 
                sparing; U.S. Government and contractor technical 
                assistance; and U.S. Government non-technical support.
                                 <all>
```
Wade POUNDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-190

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

Wade Pounds, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.

**ON CONFESSION OF ERROR**

PER CURIAM.

*1090Wade Pounds appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his December 3, 2018 *pro se* motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion as successive upon finding that Pounds raised the same ground for relief - newly discovered evidence - in an August 23, 2018 postconviction motion that the lower court denied in a November 1, 2018 order.1 As the State properly and commendably concedes, Pounds did not raise the issue of newly discovered evidence as a ground for relief in his August 23, 2018 postconviction motion. We therefore reverse the order on appeal and remand for further proceedings.2 If, on remand, the trial court again determines to summarily deny Pounds's claim, the trial court shall attach record excerpts showing that Pounds is not entitled to relief. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

We note that, in the order on review, the trial court also *both* (i) ordered Pounds to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any further *pro se* pleadings in lower tribunal case number F06-24000B, *and* (ii) prohibited Pounds from filing any further *pro se* pleadings. Because the trial court failed to follow the procedure required to impose such a prohibition, *see**State v. Spencer*, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999), we reverse this portion of the trial court's order as well. If, on remand, the trial court still wishes to preclude Pounds from filing further *pro se* pleadings in the lower court case, the court shall first issue the appropriate notice and provide Pounds with an opportunity to be heard. *Chambers v. State*, 225 So.3d 311, 311-12 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Reversed and remanded.

1

This Court affirmed the trial court's November 1, 2018 denial of Pounds's August 23, 2018 motion in appellate case number 3D18-2510. *See**Pounds v. State*, No. 3D18-2510, 2019 WL 1755650 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 17, 2019).

2

We express no opinion as to whether Pounds's claim of newly discovered evidence is legally sufficient.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 20 (Friday, January 31, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8703-8704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02023]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE631]

Public Meeting; Center of Independent Experts Review of the 
Machine Learning Coupled With Fourier Transform Near-Infrared 
Spectroscopy of Otoliths to Age Fish

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of hybrid meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Center of Independent Experts (CIE) review of the Machine 
Learning Coupled with Fourier Transform Near-infrared Spectroscopy of 
Otoliths to Age Fish will be held

[[Page 8704]]

February 11, 2025, through February 13, 2025.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 11, 2025, through 
Thursday, February 13, 2025, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pacific Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be a hybrid meeting. The in-person 
component of the meeting will be held at the Alaska Fisheries Science 
Center in room 2076, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Building 4, Seattle, WA 
98115. If you plan to attend in-person, please notify Derek Chamberlin 
at [email protected] at least 2 days prior to the meeting (or 2 
weeks prior if you are a foreign national). You will also need a valid 
U.S. Identification Card. If you are attending virtually, join the 
meeting online through the link at https://apps-afsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/ftnir/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Derek Chamberlin, Alaska Fishery 
Science Center staff; phone: (206) 526-4148; email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, Through Thursday, February 13, 2025

    The CIE will conduct a review of the readiness of machine learning 
coupled with Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy of otoliths 
to age fish for stock assessments. The agenda is subject to change, and 
the latest version will be posted at https://apps-afsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/ftnir/ prior to the meeting, along with meeting 
materials.

Public Comment

    An opportunity for public comment will be provided during the 
meeting. For more information, please visit the link at https://apps-afsc.fisheries.noaa.gov/ftnir/.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Special requests should be directed to Derek Chamberlin, via email (see 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: January 27, 2025.
Karen H. Abrams,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-02023 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
M.B. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2170050

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 23, 2018

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from CarrAmerica
Realty LP and subsidiaries consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1999
and from CarrAmerica Realty LP and subsidiaries and consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         787,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 829,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        325,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     456,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   829,199
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,330
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,814
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,814
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,814
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Notes & accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful
accounts as the allowance is immaterial.
</FN>


</TABLE>
FCSM Session on Leveraging Official Statistics Programs 

to Address Emerging Issues: Providing Information 

Relevant to the Coronavirus Pandemic

New Data for New Purposes

Rolf R. Schmitt 

Bureau of Transportation Statistics
2

Pre-Pandemic

• Traditional statistical products are annual and monthly 

• Vetting is a deliberative process 

• Preliminary estimates are based on stable trends 

• General wish for more timely products
3

The Pandemic arrives

• Anecdotal evidence of immediate effects on transportation 

system 

• Strong hunger by departmental leadership for immediate data 

to understand magnitude of changes
4

The BTS Response

• Search for surrogate indicators 

• New approaches to preliminary measures 

• New sources for traditional measures 

• Rapid prototyping 

• Numbers now, vetting later 

• Daily and weekly products
5

The BTS Response

• The Week in Transportation 

• Daily statistics for the Secretary 

• Daily travel reported weekly from mobile devices rather than 

surveys 

• County transportation profiles for geographic detail 

• Travel on the 4th of July – setting a new norm for timeliness
6

The BTS Response
7

Making the BTS Response Possible

• Previous development of the daily travel data system as

exploratory research 

• Previous development of the data pipeline 

• Contacts with data sources for traditional compilations 

• Cross-office team 

• Pre-existing arrangements for telework 

• Sense of challenge and urgency
8

The new normal

• Daily statistics reported weekly to capture temporal variation, 

tabulated at the county level to capture geographic variation 

• Explore and vet the new data sources 

• Remote operations
9

www.bts.gov/covid-19
Notice of Regular Meeting 

of the Board of Directors 

of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation 

February 7, 2024 

SUMMARY: Notice of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Farm 

Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) is hereby given in accordance with the 

provisions of the Bylaws of the FCSIC. 

DATES: 10 a.m., Wednesday, February 7, 2024. 

ADDRESSES: You may observe the open portions of this meeting in person at 1501 Farm 

Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to observe, at 

least 24 hours in advance, visit FCSIC.gov, select “News & Events,” then select “Board 

Meetings.” From there, access the linked “Instructions for board meeting visitors” and 

complete the described registration process. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you need more information or assistance for 

accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley Waldron, Secretary to the Board. 

Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-4056. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The 

rest of the meeting will be closed to the public. The following matters will be considered: 

Portions Open to the Public: 

• Approval of Minutes for December 13, 2023 

• Review and Setting of Insurance Premium Accrual Rates 

Portions Closed to the Public: 

• Annual Report on Contracts 

• Annual Report on Whistleblower Activity 

______ ________________ 

Ashley Waldron 

Secretary to the Board 

January 24, 2024 

Date 

ASHLEY 

WALDRON 

Digitally signed by 

ASHLEY WALDRON 

Date: 2024.01.24 13:52:14 

-05'00'
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20735

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS ORTIZ-FLORES, also known as Alacran,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-78-5

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Ortiz-Flores has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Ortiz-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 4, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-20735 Document: 00514668466 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2018
No. 17-20735

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-20735 Document: 00514668466 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2018
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-19   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 2

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-19   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IMANI A. MAHDI, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 16-1093-CRC

)

)

PATRICK J. MURPHY, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter, brought pro se under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, is before 

the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

12(b)(3) for improper venue and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief can be granted. Plaintiff has not complied with the order to respond to 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss by November 7, 2016. See Oct. 3, 2016 Order [ECF 

No. 9]. Therefore, the Court finds Defendant’s arguments for dismissal to be 

conceded. See generally Def.’s Mem. in Support of Mot. to Dismiss. 

Title VII’s venue provision requires such actions to be brought in the judicial 

district in the State where (1) the unlawful employment practice is alleged to have 

occurred; (2) the relevant employment records are maintained and administered; or (3) 

the plaintiff would have worked but for the alleged unlawful practice. 42 U.S.C. 

§ 2000e-5(f)(3). If the defendant “is not found within any such district,” the action 

may be brought in the judicial district in the State where defendant’s principal office 

is located. Id. 
2

It is clear from the allegations in the complaint that this action arose from 

Plaintiff’s employment in Fort Belvoir, Virginia, which is also the location of 

Defendant’s principal office. See Def.’s Mem. at 6. Given Plaintiff’s inaction, the 

interests of justice would not be served by transferring this case to the U.S. District 

Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Therefore, the Court will grant Defendant’s 

motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(3) and dismiss the case without prejudice. A

separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

____________s/_______________

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

DATE: December 21, 2016 United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that:



(i)    the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    March 3, 2005



/s/    STUART A. TANZStuart A. TanzChairman, Chief Executive Officerand President




---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that:



(i)    the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    March 3, 2005



/s/    JOSEPH B. TYSONJoseph B. TysonExecutive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Secretary
IN RE: The PEROXISOME TRUST

NO. 2019-CC-0896

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 2019

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avantair, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Santo, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2011





/s/ Steven SantoName:
Steven SantoTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
STATE of Louisiana v. Terrance Randall WASHINGTON

NO. 2019-KH-0365

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 15, 2019

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he sought review in the court(s) below before filing in this Court nor shown the "extraordinary circumstances" that would justify bypassing that level of review. La.S.Ct.R. X § 5(b).
---

**Exhibit 13.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Madison Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended October 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 28, 2013  “Ian Brown”Ian BrownChief Financial Officer


---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                          NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY
                             1998 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN
                           (AS AMENDED ON MAY 7, 1998)

         WHEREAS, NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY (the "Company") has heretofore
adopted the NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY 1998 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN (AS AMENDED ON
MAY 7, 1998) (the "Plan") for the benefit of certain employees of the Company;
and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of
July 28, 2003:

         1.       Subparagraph II(f) of the Plan shall be deleted and the
following shall be substituted therefor:

                  "(f)     "COMMITTEE" means the Compensation Committee of the
         Board."

         2.       The following new Subparagraph (d) shall be added to Paragraph
IV of the Plan:

                  "(d)     DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY BY THE COMMITTEE.
         Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Paragraph IV or any
         other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Committee may from
         time to time, in its sole discretion, delegate all or a portion of its
         powers, duties and responsibilities under the Plan to a subcommittee of
         the Committee. In particular, the Committee may delegate the
         administration (or interpretation of any provision) of the Plan, and
         the right to grant Awards under the Plan, to a subcommittee consisting
         solely of two or more members of the Committee who are outside
         directors (within the meaning of the term "outside directors" as used
         in section 162(m) of the Code and applicable interpretive authority
         thereunder and within the meaning of "Non-Employee Director" as defined
         in Rule 16b-3). The Committee may put any conditions and restrictions
         on the powers that may be exercised by such subcommittee upon such
         delegation as the Committee determines in its sole discretion, and the
         Committee may revoke such delegation at any time."

         3.       As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and
reaffirmed.