alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07-0239-CR and 07-07-0240-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	DECEMBER 31, 2007

	______________________________

	KEVIN MIKEL BRASHEARS, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2  OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 116503-2; 116851-2; HONORABLE PAMELA COOK SIRMON, JUDGE 		_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Kevin Mikel Brashears filed notices of appeal from his convictions of May 15, 2007.  On June 13, 2007, the trial court granted a motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s appointed counsel.  No attorney was appointed to represent appellant on appeal.  The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have not been filed.

	On August 24, 2007, we abated these appeals, and remanded them to the County Court at Law No. 2 of Potter County to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute the appeals, and whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel.1  During the hearing held on September 10, 2007, at which appellant appeared, the trial court determined that appellant desired to prosecute these appeals but was not indigent and not entitled to appointed counsel.  We reinstated appellant’s appeals on our receipt of the supplemental record of the hearing.

	The trial court clerk and reporter filed requests for extension, stating they were unable to file the records because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for them.  By letters of October 26, 2007, this Court directed appellant to file written verification, by November 15, 2007, of his compliance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 34.6(b)(1), 35.3(a)(2) and 35.3(b),2 or a reasonable explanation for his non- compliance.  We advised appellant that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the appeals for want of prosecution.3  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  Appellant has not responded to our letters.  Nor have we received the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, or written verification that appellant has made payment arrangements for either record. 

	The record before us contains the trial court’s finding appellant is not indigent.  Tex. R. App. P. 20.2.  We find the trial court clerk has failed to file the clerk’s record in these appeals because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for preparation of the record, and find that appellant has had a reasonable opportunity to cure his failure to do so.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). 

						James T. Campbell

						          Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armitage Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence Stephenson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of February, 2006.


/s/  Laurence Stephenson
---------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Antoni EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-452

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Making Sense of Census Data via the World Wide Web 

A Case Study Using the 1997 Census of Agriculture 

Irwin Anolik 

USDA - National Agricultural Statistics Service - Research and Development Division 

3251 Old Lee Highway - Room 305 

Fairfax VA 22030-1504 

(703) 235-5218 x114 FAX:(703) 235-3386 

ia noli k@nass. usd a. gov 

ABSTRACT 

This paper discusses research conducted at the National Agricultural Statistics Service 

(NASS) with the intent of enabling data customers to freely and effectively access and 

analyze NASS data using the World Wide Web. We initially focus on using data from the 

1997 Census of Agriculture* to research and demonstrate methods of display and analysis 

that could give a better understanding of inherent patterns and structure in the data. We 

specifically wanted to provide the ability to view, analyze, and dynamically interact wlth 

summary data at the state and county level using a web browser connected to the Internet. 

Historically, such customers have had access to this data in tabular form only. 

The paper also discusses the important concepts and technologies that we considered, and 

documents the selection of specific solutions that we implement on the NASS web site to 

give data customers the abilities discussed above. We discuss our attempt to design the 

web site so that information of interest to the largest number of customers is the easiest to 

access. 

Many of the displays included in initial prototypes were produced using "rowplot" and 

"micromap" functions originally developed in "S-PLUS" programming language by Dr. Dan 

Carr. We modified the script files made available by Dr. Carr to create plots using NASS 

data. We also discuss animated maps that we developed and combined with trend charts to 

help give context in a novel way to those visiting the web site seeking historical data. 

While this paper focuses on data from the 1997 Census of Agriculture, the principles and 

methods discussed can be applied to other sources of survey and census data. 

Keywords 

Exploratory data analysis, dynamic data display, Multi-variate visualization, interactive 

graphics, summary data 

*In 1997, responsibility for the Census of Agriculture was transferred from the Bureau of the Census 

to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). In large part, this responsibility involves 

collecting, analyzing and publishing data regarding all places defined as farms. Historically, the 

Census of Agriculture represents the leading source of local area statistics about U.S. agriculture. 

75 

Page 187
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Louis BIANCULLI, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1684

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 6, 2019]

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion of Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Jayne C. Weintraub of Nelson Mullens, Miami, and Herbert M. Cohen of Herbert M. Cohen, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Warner and Conner, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Civil Minutes

Date: January 3, 2019 Judge: Hon. James Donato

Time: 53 Minutes

Case No. C-17-00039-JD

Case Name Federal Trade Commission v. D-Link Corporation et al

Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s): Kevin Moriarty/Brian Bergren

Attorney(s) for Defendant(s): Christopher Kao/Michael Pepson/Jessica L. Thompson/John J. 

Vecchione

Deputy Clerk: Lisa R. Clark Court Reporter: Debra Pas

PROCEEDINGS

Pretrial Conference - Held

NOTES AND ORDERS

The Court will enter a final pretrial order.

The Court will grant the FTC’s motion to continue the trial date if the government shutdown is 

still in place as of 12:00 p.m. California time on January 7, 2019. The parties should propose 

trial dates in June 2019 for the Court to consider.

The case is referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for settlement proceedings.

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 252 Filed 01/04/19 Page 1 of 1
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

CLARENCE GANAWAY , Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v. UNITED STATES , Defendant

- Appellee

.

__________________________ 201 3- 5031

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in N o. 12

- CV

- 0654, Judge Francis M. Allegra

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R Clarence Ganaway moves for reconsideration o f the court’s February 15, 2013 order dismissing his case for failure to pay the required docketing fe e , and moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel

. The United States opposes. Case: 13-5031 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 07/01/2013CLARENCE GANAWAY v. US 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), this court may a ppoint an attorney to represent a litigant in federal court, but there is no automatic right to appoint ment of counsel in a civil case; the authority is discretionary. See Castro Romero v. Becken , 256 F.3d 349, 353

- 54 (5th Cir. 2001). Under th e circumstances presented here, we do not see the need to exercise this court’s discretion to appoint counsel to Mr. Ganaway. Accordingly
, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) Ganaway is directed to complete and return the enclosed “Motion and Declaration for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis” and “Supplemental In Forma Pau peris Form for Prisoners” forms. If Ganaway does not submit the enclosed forms within 30 days from the date of filing of this or der his motion for reconsideration will be denied. (2) Ganaway’s request for appointment of counsel is denied.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

cc: Clarence Ganaway ( Federal Circuit Forms 6 and 6A enclosed)

s 26 Case: 13-5031 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 07/01/2013
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Rick Dobson, Chief Financial Officer of Novelis Inc. (Novelis), certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Novelis;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:October 19, 2006            /s/ Rick Dobson         Rick Dobson    Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, David R. Malmstedt, Chief Executive Officer of Vincera, Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vincera, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instruction contained in SEC Release 34-47986]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  August 21, 2006  /s/ David R. Malmstedt Name: David R. Malmstedt Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)     1
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optionable, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc-Andre Boisseau Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the

Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|November 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc-Andre Boisseau
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                  |  | Marc-Andre Boisseau    
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

---
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Elizabeth Plaza, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Pedro J. Lasanta, Chief Financial
Officer  of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
June 15, 2009





/s/
      Elizabeth Plaza
                
                /s/
      Pedro J. LasantaElizabeth
      Plaza
                
                Pedro
      J. LasantaChief
      Executive Officer
                
                Chief
      Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

THOMAS EDWARD BLANKENSHIP, §

Petitioner, §

 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:06-CV-115-Y

 §

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, §

T.D.C.J., Correctional § 

Institutions Division, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Before the Court is the petition for writ of habeas corpus

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 of petitioner Thomas Edward Blankenship,

along with the February 1, 2007, findings, conclusions, and

recommendation of the United States magistrate judge. The magistrate judge gave the parties until February 22, 2007, to file

written objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation. As of the date of this order, no written objections have

been filed. 

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this

case, and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation of the United States magistrate

judge filed on February 22, 2007. The Court concludes that the

petition for writ of habeas corpus should be denied for the reasons

stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the

magistrate judge are hereby ADOPTED.

Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. 

SIGNED March 5, 2007.

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00115-Y Document 17 Filed 03/05/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 190
Lens TOUSSAINT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0984

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 99.4

Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Disclosure of KPMG LLP Fees for the Years
Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004

For services rendered during or in connection with our fiscal years 2005 and 2004, as
applicable, KPMG LLP billed the following fees:



|                   |  |      |         |     |      |   |           |    
|------------------ |  | ---- | ------- | --- | ---- | - | --------- | ---
|                   |  | 2005 |         |     | 2004 |  
|Audit Fees         |  | $    | 958,000 |     |      | $ | 1,144,500 |    
|Audit-Related Fees |  |      | 61,000  | (1) |      |   | 30,000    | (3)
|Tax Fees           |  |      | 213,436 | (2) |      |   | 294,691   | (4)
|All Other Fees     |  |      | 0       |     |      |   | 0         |    

---

|(1) | Accounting research and consultations - $50,000, and $11,00 for an employee benefit plan.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Consisted of $100,840 for tax compliance services and $112,596 for tax advisory services.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Consisted of $20,000 for accounting research and consultations and other services and $10,000 for an employee benefit plan audit.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Consisted of $140,347 for tax compliance services and $154,344 for tax advisory services.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

Our
Audit Committee, which has the sole authority to pre-approve any engagement of CarrAmericas independent auditor to provide audit, audit-related or non-audit services, has established policies and procedures for approving all professional
services rendered by KPMG LLP. Under our pre-approval policies and procedures, our Audit Committee may not delegate the pre-approval of audit services to management of CarrAmerica but itself must pre-approve all audit services and permissible
non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. The Audit Committee generally reviews and approves engagement letters for audit services before the provision of those services commences. For all other services, the Audit Committee has
pre-approved the use of KPMG LLP for specific services up to certain pre-determined dollar limits. Any services not specified or services which will exceed the pre-determined dollar limits must be approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee or
another designated member of the Audit Committee. The member to whom such authority is delegated is responsible for reporting action taken to the Audit Committee at its next meeting.