alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 895 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption 

from gross income for mandatory restitution or civil damages as recompense for trafficking in persons. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. WICKER, and Ms. 

SINEMA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exemption from gross income for mandatory restitution or civil damages as recompense for trafficking in 

persons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Human Trafficking 

5 Survivor Tax Relief Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 895 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION 

2 RESTITUTION AND CIVIL DAMAGES AWARD3 ED UNDER SECTIONS 1593 AND 1595 OF TITLE 

4 18, UNITED STATES CODE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended 

7 by section 9501(b)(4) of the American Rescue Plan Act 

8 of 2021 (Public Law 117–2), is amended by inserting be9 fore section 140 the following new section: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 139J. CERTAIN AMOUNT RECEIVED AS RESTITUTION 

11 OR CIVIL DAMAGES AS RECOMPENSE FOR 

12 TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS. 

13 ‘‘(a) EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME.—Gross in14 come shall not include any civil damages, restitution, or 

15 other monetary award (including compensatory or statu16 tory damages and restitution imposed in a criminal mat17 ter) awarded— 

18 ‘‘(1) pursuant to an order of restitution under 

19 section 1593 of title 18, United States Code, or 

20 ‘‘(2) in an action under section 1595 of title 18, 

21 United States Code.’’. 

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec23 tions for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the In24 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting be25 fore the item relating to section 140 the following new 

26 item: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 895 IS

‘‘Sec. 139J. Certain amount received as restitution or civil damages as recompense for trafficking in persons.’’. 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Case 2:05-cv-00250-J Document 4 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 22
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00250-J Document 4 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 23
D’wana R. Terry

Acting Director

Cynthia Bryant

Attorney 

Advisor

Meishia Hunter

Attorney 

Advisor

Kenneth 

Heredia

Program Analyst

Rosalind Bailey

Equal Employment 

Specialist

Amanda 

Gallagher

Reader

Erica Douglas

Program Support 

Assistant (Detailed)

Office of Workplace Diversity 

Organizational Chart

As of 5/3/2021
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00646

- CV

Robert Ray PEREZ and Rhonda Lee Arevalo,

Appellants

v.

Arturo Zepeda ARREDONDO , CUSA KBC, LLC d/b/a Kerrville Bus Company,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 07

- 15670

- CV

Honorable Joaquin Villarreal III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of th is date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellants Robert Ray Perez and Rhonda Lee

Arevalo.

SIGNED December 3, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
EX PARTE Alfred P. MONTGOMERY

1160742 (CR-16-0076)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

District of Northern California

On Behalf of PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong Kong 

corporation, by Mabel Mak, and MABEL MAK, an 

individual, 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-07387

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation, and 

PRAVEEN NARRA KUMAR, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

Indyzen, Inc. (“Indyzen”) 

2033 Gateway Place, San Jose, 

California 95110, United States of America. 

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you 

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, 

whose name and address are:

David Alan Makman

Law Offices of David A. Makman

655 Mariners Island Blvd, Suite 306

San Mateo, CA 94404

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 2 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 2 Filed 12/29/16 Page 2 of 2
Order entered June 12, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01002
- CR QUINTIN RAMONE LANG, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. F08
- 72933
- M



### O RDER
In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. Accordingly , we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees , and court appointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copie s of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m., Friday, January 10, 2025.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The Commission will conduct a meeting closed to the public to consider the Commission's response, if any, to show cause orders issued by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in D.C. Cir. No. 24-1293 (and consolidated case D.C. Cir. No. 24-1356), and D.C. Cir. No. 24-1294 (and consolidated case DC Cir No. 24-1357). Commissioners will attend the meeting. Commission staff members who provide technological support and other Commission staff may also be present as necessary. This meeting is closed to the public pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10) on the basis of the Commission's “participation in a civil action or proceeding.” The Commission determined that shorter than usual notice for a meeting was required by official agency business.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

 Sarah Stewart (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 8, 2025.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2025-00681 Filed 1-8-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
Darrius JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2768

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 11, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

lionorablo lorrester Hane4ak 

Cri5ln41 Distriot Attorney 

%'axahachie, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

June 29, lQS9, wk 

or your let* Of 

llowlng r4qtI4st: 

or your ogleion 

r4 neo486ary befor 

qualirlsd oandidate 

an lmle~ndent rohool 

t: -5, 333.16 COUJl~y, 

infomatlon, the independent oQbao1 

tloa is loortsd In the olty of. 

being thy control of seid publm~ly to JOlD mtJU46t rPad4, thZ6 i8 to 

aavlce that krtio~l4 2771 of the Revfeed civil Stat&u of 

T4xa6, 1,085, a6 n6w ll;;%sra4 and sfteot, pravlderr, wIig 

other thlnge, that; 8ahho416 thU6 Or5?X&M(r (tide aiLIllt 

dlatrlcto in critics) 6a far a6 the ~66~4 arc? appl r aable 

6h6tl be eubdeet to the gan4ral law6 of Texemr 

fmd Art.1614 2W7, .R. C. S. of !&xata, 1985, 48 

now in fox-06 and effecrt, a6mJa& othar things, -46 th4 foflowing provialxon: 
Con. yorrevter Dancock, psgs 2 

"P&Y pezsdn shall be ellgibl4 to any Stat4, 

couaty, preolnot or lpnrrlcipl offlO in this 

state unl466 he shall be ellgIbl4 to hold office undar the Constitution of this State, and 

unlsss he 6hall hav4 resld4d in thin State for 

the period of twelv4 month6 end 61x month8 in 

th4 aouuty, preainot, or auniolpallty, in which 

he off4r6 hims4lf a6 a oeadldate next preceding 

. . . e14ct10n, . . . v 

This d4partznent in 1912 held *a person who has 

not resid4d I.6 th4 dietriot 8It aontha at the tin4 of his 

aleotion I6 not quallfled to sot as trust4esof an lndopendent sohool district.* 

In en opinion addr4a64d to Mr. If, ?. Deamrmr4, 

Superintendent, Lalw Vl4w Pub114 Sahool8, Lahe View, T4xa6, 

this I)egartment h4l.d that *in ord4r for a p4rs0n kt held 

the offhe of 6chooltru6t6+e iaanlndependeat 8ahw1 

dlatrlot, he need not hold a poll tax moelpt.w 

fn a letter opinion dated April 27, 192l, by 

this mpertm4nt, addres64d to hr. yr4nh TurMr, Santa Aana, 

T4xaa, it watt h4ld that *a Mraon my hold th4 oSfl44 of 

school trust44 in an lnd4p6nd4nt 6ehool district without 

bar- @d~hiS p0l.l t&X.-' 

This mpamt by oplnlon No. o-655, ablr4se4a 

to the Elonorable L. L. Roberts, Couety Auditor of Barger, 

Texes, under date of harclh 27, 1939, stated: *A poll tax 

rscsipt not a atatutoryyr4r4quislt4 to qualifl4atlon of 

indepen44nt school distriot trustee6.* 

~w4, t&er*ior4, are of the oplnlon thpt. tot a 

person tc be quallfi4d au a eendldlete for tru6taM of an 

independsnt sahool district suah as th4 one in qlW6tiOn 

he n4ed odly to ooaply with Art.1414 2927 of the &mi646 

Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, and ehall have resided in 

Texae for 8 p4riod or tw4lv4 164nths and for 61x aonth6 

Inthe county, preolnot or launicipality in which h6 4ftSr6 

h-elf as a candidate, aaxt preoe4ing~the election at 

whlah he offer6 hiillselr for eleetion. 
in2 

Hon. Porreater Hamock, Page 3 

‘Cje are 

Your6 vary tmly 

ATTOFiNEYGENERAL OFT&MS 

. 

IL
Christopher Carlton BROADY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-634

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0903V

UNPUBLISHED

BRAD BUNDESEN,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: October 15, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Wa shington, DC, for

Petitioner.

Kyle Edward Pozza, U.S. Department of Ju stice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On June 20, 2019, Brad Bundesen filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensati on Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffer ed a left Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to him on November 3, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Pr ocessing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 15, 2020, Respon dent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’ s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “petitioner has satisf ied the criteria set forth in the

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims ' website in accordance with the E-Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would cons titute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 Vaccine Injury Table (Table) and the Qualific ations and Aids to Interpretation (QAI); petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation or dysfunction in his left shoulder; his pain and reduced range of motion occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; his symptoms were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnorma lity was identified to explain his initial symptoms.” Id. at 5.

In view of Respondent’s position a nd the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
J.F. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160785

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1     In connection with the Annual Report of P.F. Chang’s on Form 10-K for the year endedJanuary 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I Rick L. Federico, Chief Executive Officer of P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc. (the“Registrant”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge : 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.         /s/ RICHARD L. FEDERICO   *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*  February 15, 2006   
64
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, TEP-5A: SBIR Review Meeting, March 3, 2025, 11 a.m. to 4 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7W534, Rockville, Maryland, 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 26, 2024, FR Doc 2024-30711, 89 FR 105062.                

This notice is being amended to change the virtual meeting date from March 03, 2025, 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. to March 4, 2025, 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting times, format, and location will stay the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 14, 2025.

David W. Freeman,

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2025-01328 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 HORIZON LINES, INC
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Lines, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ M. Mark UrbaniaM. Mark UrbaniaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Clayton CLARKE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 20, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

FREDERICK E. KREPPS AND

MARGARET M. KREPPS,

 Petitioners

 v.

KHRISTIAN SNYDER, DPM AND

CHERRY TREE FOOT AND ANKLE

SPECIALISTS, P.C.,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 314 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors
                        -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Encompass Services Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-41749, No. 333-41751, No. 333-58651, No. 333-60537, No. 333-69421, No.
333-78311, No. 333-93649, No. 333-35330, No. 333-35334 and No. 333-35418) on
Form S-8, the registration statements (No. 333-81201 and No. 333-93649) on Form
S-4, and the registration statement (No. 333-93665) on Form S-3 of Encompass
Services Corporation of our report dated February 19, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Encompass Services Corporation and Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and other comprehensive income and cash flows
for the years then ended, which report appears in this Form 10-K of Encompass
Services Corporation. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting
for derivative instruments and hedging activities.

KPMG
Houston, Texas
March 13, 2002