alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BROADCOM CORPORATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 

DENYING IN PART BROADCOM 

CORPORATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 1120

Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”) has sought to seal portions of the McGregor 

Deposition as well as JX0095. Applying the compelling reasons standard for sealing, the Court 

rules on the sealing request for the McGregor Deposition below. 

However, Broadcom has failed to provide the Court with an unredacted version JX0095, so 

the Court does not know what information Broadcom seeks to seal from this document. Thus, 

Broadcom’s request to seal portions of JX0095 is DENIED without prejudice. Broadcom shall 

submit an unredacted version of JX0095 for the Court’s consideration by 8:00 a.m. on January 7, 

2019, or else its motion to file portions of JX0095 under seal will be denied with prejudice.

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

McGregor Deposition 17:4-18 GRANTED.

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1139 Filed 01/06/19 Page 1 of 2
2

Case No. 17-CV-00220-LHK 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART BROADCOM CORPORATION'S ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Document Portions of Pages Ruling

McGregor Deposition 19:3-7 GRANTED.

McGregor Deposition 26:19-27 DENIED.

McGregor Deposition 173:20-175:21 DENIED.

McGregor Deposition 184:9-24 GRANTED.

McGregor Deposition 237:18-239:25 DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2019

______________________________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Document 1139 Filed 01/06/19 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 20735 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JESUS ORTIZ

- FLORES, also known as Alacran , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 78

- 5

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Ortiz

- Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortiz

- Flores h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 4, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-20735 Document: 00514668466 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2018No. 17

- 20735

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-20735 Document: 00514668466 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2018
# C_2018022EN.01002102.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 23 October 2017 — PM v AH

(Case C-604/17)

(2018/C 022/32)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Varhoven kasatsionen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: PM

Appellant:

Respondent: AH

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (1) permit the examination of cases concerning parental responsibility, where the conditions laid down in Articles 8 and 12 of that regulation have not been fulfilled, by a court of a Member State which has jurisdiction to examine the divorce case under Article 3 of the regulation, where the national legislation of that Member State requires the court to rule ex officio on the exercise of parental rights, measures concerning access, maintenance and use of the marital home, at the same time as the divorce application?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-1123 (Third Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on steel wire garment hangers from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.[2] 

## Background

The Commission instituted this review on July 1, 2024 (89 FR 54519) and determined on October 4, 2024, that it would conduct an expedited review (89 FR 89040, November 12, 2024).

                    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on January 27, 2025. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5580 (January 2025), entitled                     *Steel Wire Garment Hangers from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1123 (Third Review).*
      ( print page 8717)    

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 28, 2025.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Schmidtlein not participating.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2025-02050 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 24, 2025, concerning the schedule and agenda for a Meeting of the Board of Governors. The document contained incorrect dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael J. Elston, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 24, 2025, in FR Doc. 2025-01748, on page 8165, in the third column, correct the “Matters to be Considered” caption to read:                

## Matters To Be Considered

## Meeting of the Board of Governors

### Wednesday, February 5, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Matters.

2. Financial and Operational Matters.

3. Compensation and Personnel Matters.

4. Administrative Items.

### Thursday, February 6, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. (Open)

1. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board of Governors.

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.

3. Approval of the Minutes.

4. Committee Reports.

5. Quarterly Financial Report.

6. Quarterly Service Performance Report.

7. Approval of Tentative Agenda for the May 8, 2025 Meeting.

8. Adjournment

Dated: January 28, 2025.

Michael J. Elston,

Secretary of the Board of Governors.

[FR Doc. 2025-02053 Filed 1-28-25; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IIA 

Calendar No. 8 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 9 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. LEE, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. COTTON, Ms. ERNST, Mr. DAINES, 

Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. TILLIS) introduced 

the following joint resolution; which was read the first time 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require that the Supreme Court of the United 

States be composed of nine justices. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 9 PCS 

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

3 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

4 for ratification: 

5 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

6 ‘‘The Supreme Court of the United States shall be 

7 composed of nine justices.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 8 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 9 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the 

tices. of the United States be composed of nine jusUnited States to require that the Supreme Court 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
10.1


 


AGREEMENT


 


                AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), dated as of June 24, 2003,
by and between New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation
(“Company”), and Steven F. Siegel (“Executive”).


 


RECITALS


 


                A.            Executive
is currently Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the
Company.


 


                B.            The
Company and Executive entered into an employment agreement dated as of
September 25, 1998 (as amended and extended, the “Employment Agreement”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Employment
Agreement, the term of the “Employment Period” under the Employment Agreement
expires on December 31, 2003.


 


                C.            The
Company desires to extend the “Employment Period” under the Employment
Agreement for a term of three (3) years (i.e., from January 1, 2004 through
December 31, 2006) and otherwise on the same terms and conditions as the
Employment Agreement (the “Siegel Employment Agreement Extension”).


 


                D.            The
Executive Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company by Unanimous Written Consent dated as of June 24, 2003 authorized
and approved the Siegel Employment Agreement Extension.


 


 


 


AGREEMENT


 


                IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and the mutual
covenants set forth below, the parties hereby agree to modify the terms of the
Employment Agreement as follows:


 


1.                                       The Employment Period under the
Employment Agreement shall be extended for a term of three (3) years and
accordingly shall expire on December 31, 2006, subject to the extension
provisions contained in Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement.


 


2.                                           Except as herein provided, all of the
terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in
full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first
above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  NEW PLAN EXCEL REALTY
  TRUST, INC., a Maryland corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Glenn J. Rufrano

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Glenn J. Rufrano

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  STEVEN F. SIEGEL

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Steven F. Siegel
A.N. v. CLEBURNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2170029

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Affirmed.
SICE, INC., a Corporation, and Richard Mann, Individually and as Agent for Sice, Inc., Appellants, v. Caitlin MILSTEAD, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Zachary Stinson, Appellee.

No. 3D19-0015

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

      Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                                  to 
                         Certificate Holders

                                                       Ending
Class          Interest       Principal      Losses    Balance
<S>            <C>            <C>            <C>       <C> 
A1              5,529,080.20   5,203,960.74      0.00   115,088,039.22
A2                219,566.64           0.00      0.00     4,705,000.00
A3              1,325,333.36           0.00      0.00    28,400,000.00
APO                     0.00      47,763.14      0.00       996,642.19
AR                     26.93           0.00      0.00           100.00
AWIO              295,241.92           0.00      0.00             0.00
B1                 93,127.39      12,524.62      0.00     1,988,475.39
B2                 37,232.32       5,007.34      0.00       794,992.66
B3                 37,232.32       5,007.34      0.00       794,992.66
B4                  7,446.45       1,001.46      0.00       158,998.53
B5                 11,211.62       1,205.25    302.57       239,392.80
M                  74,464.67      10,014.68      0.00     1,589,985.32





</TABLE>
Moses JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-654

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 21 (Monday, February 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02105]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 4, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. 
(``PXI Systems'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, PEAK-System Technik GmbH, Darmstadt, GERMANY; Shikino 
High-Tech Co. Ltd., Toyama, JAPAN; TEVET, Greeneville, TN; Vector 
Informatik GmbH, Stuttgart, GERMANY; and XIA LLC Associates, Oakland, 
CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 2, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2024 (89 FR 82629).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-02105 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```
**Exhibit      32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

  

| /s/                Thomas Kreig                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| Thomas                Kreig                    |
| Interim                Chief Financial Officer |
| May                15, 2008                    |

----
# Putting People Over Fish: Stopping Radical Environ­mentalism To Provide Water to Southern California

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Commerce [and] the Secretary of the Interior

I hereby direct the Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the heads of other departments and agencies of the United States as necessary, to immediately restart the work from my first Administration by the National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Reclamation, and other agencies to route more water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to other parts of the state for use by the people there who desperately need a reliable water supply.

During my first term, the State of California, at the direction of its Governor, filed a lawsuit to stop my Administration from implementing improvements to California's water infrastructure. My Administration's plan would have allowed enormous amounts of water to flow from the snow melt and rainwater in rivers in Northern California to beneficial use in the Central Valley and Southern California. This catastrophic halt was allegedly in protection of the Delta smelt and other species of fish. Today, this enormous water supply flows wastefully into the Pacific Ocean.

The recent deadly and historically destructive wildfires in Southern California underscore why the State of California needs a reliable water supply and sound vegetation management practices in order to provide water desperately needed there, and why this plan must immediately be reimplemented.

Within 90 days of the date of this memorandum, the Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of the Interior shall report to me regarding the progress made in implementing the policies in this memorandum and provide any recommendations regarding future implementation.

[FR Doc. 2025-02041

Billing code 3395-F4-P
Barbara Ann KELLY, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0522

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Wornick Company (the “Company”)for the thirteen week period ended April 1, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael M. Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 16, 2006 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |   |
|                    | By:    |  /s/ Michael M. Thompson |
|                    |   | Michael M. Thompson |
|                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

A signed original of thiswritten statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----