alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL CARILLON BEACH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. CARILLON HOTEL, LLC, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
H. Res. 55 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 22, 2025. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Doggett, Mr. Scott 

of Virginia, Mr. Peters of California, Mr. Panetta, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Plaskett, Ms. Escobar, Ms. Omar, Ms. 

Balint, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Tonko, Mr. McGarvey, 

Mr. Amo. 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Morelle, 

Ms. Sewell, Mrs. Torres of California, Ms. Johnson of Texas. 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Ms. Vela ́zquez, 

Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Soto, Ms. Brownley. 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Ms. Pressley, Ms. Tlaib. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Teddrick JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4711

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Nazario RODRIGUEZ-GIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3964

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RUSSELL AINSWORTH, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:17-cv-00077-KAW 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 

RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. No. 16

On May 11, 2017, Defendants Jon Loevy, Michael Kanovitz, Russell Ainsworth, Ashley 

Peterson, Richard Silverstein, Bruce Goldstone, Silverstein Realty Group LLC, SRG Manager 

LLC, and Hayden Manager LLC filed an administrative motion to extend their time to answer or 

otherwise respond to the first amended complaint by 60 days. (Defs.’ Mot., Dkt. No. 16.) 

Defendants asked Plaintiff to stipulate to the extension of time, but Plaintiff refused. (Decl. of Joel 

Feldman, Dkt. No. 16 at 4 ¶ 6.)

On May 15, 2017,1Plaintiff filed an opposition stating that the material allegations were 

the same as those contained in the operative complaint, and that if Defendants had wanted 

additional time, they should have agreed to waive service. (Pl.’s Opp’n, Dkt. No. 17 at 2.)

While Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court finds that the Northern District’s Guidelines 

for Professional Conduct are instructive in terms of how law should be practiced. Specifically, 

they provide that “[c]onsistent with existing law and court orders, a lawyer should agree to 

reasonable requests for extensions of time when the legitimate interests of his or her client will not 

 

1

The May 15, 2017 submission was incorrectly e-filed as an administrative motion, but appears to 

be identical to the correctly e-filed document on May 16, 2017. (Dkt. No. 18.) Thus, the Court will 

consider the May 15, 2017 opposition timely filed, and disregards the duplicate filing.
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

be adversely affected.” (N.D. Guidelines § 4.) In the interest of professionalism, this includes 

requests for additional time to respond to pleadings. (See id. at § 4c (“Unless time is of the 

essence, a lawyer should agree as a matter of courtesy to first requests for reasonable extensions of 

time, even if the requesting counsel previously refused to grant an extension.”).)

Here, there is no indication that time is of the essence despite the fact that Plaintiff’s 

requested relief includes injunctive relief. First, not all defendants appear to have been served in 

this action. Second, the initial case management conference is not until August 22, 2017. Thus, 

Plaintiff’s interests will not be adversely affected by the proposed extension.

In light of the foregoing, Defendants’ request for an extension of time is GRANTED. 

Defendants shall file their response to the first amended complaint on or before July 10, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 6, 2017

__________________________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Two Rivers Water Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne Harding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:  August 10, 2011
By: /s/ Wayne HardingChief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer
### NUM BER 13-0 7-65 8-CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ LU IS SILVAS L UGO , A pp ellan t, v . TH E STA

TE OF T EXAS, A pp ellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On A p p ea l fro m th e 28 th D is tr ic t C o u rt of N ue ces Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 

## ME MOR A ND UM OP IN ION Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd B en av ide s M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, L u i s S i l v a s L u g o , b y a n d t h ro u g h h i s a tt o r n e y , h a s fi l e d a m o t i o n to dis mis s h isappeal bec ause he no lon g er d e sir e s to p rosec ute i t. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 2(a). W itho utp as s i ng o n th e me r i tso f t he c as e, we g ran t th e mo ti on t o di s mi ss pursuantto Texas Rul e of Appel lat e Procedu re 42.2 (a ) and di smi ssthe appeal
. H av ing dism iss e d the appeal at appel lan t' s req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned,

### 2

and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h. P E RC U R I A M
Do not p ubl is h. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 7.2( b)
. Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s 1 3th d ay

of Ma rc h, 20 08.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of TSI International Software Ltd. and subsidiaries of our report
dated February 2, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of TSI
International Software Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of TSI International Software Ltd. and subsidiaries:


Registration Statement Number 333-32002 on Form S-8
Registration Statement Number 333-32546 on Form S-3
Registration Statement Number 333-37969 on Form S-8
Registration Statement Number 333-81427 on Form S-3
Registration Statement Number 333-89951 on Form S-8

/KPMG/

New York, New York
March 30, 2000
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PAUL A. SCHILLECI,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2012-3188

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. AT0845110786-I-1.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID GESPASS, Gespass & Johnson, of Birmingham, 

Alabama, argued for petitioner. 

KENNETH M. DINTZER, Trial Attorney, Commercial 

Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Principal 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, 

Director, TODD M. HUGHES, Deputy Director, and TARA K.

HOGAN, Trial Attorney. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 

 April 8, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Pixelworks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven L. Moore, Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Steven L. MooreSteven L. MooreVice President, Chief Financial Officer Secretary and TreasurerDate:

March 9, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of LHC Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Keith G. Myers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter J. Roman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Keith G. MyersKeith G. MyersChief Executive Officer(Principal executive officer)




/s/ Peter J. RomanPeter J. RomanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal financial officer)
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-592 Lower Tribunal No. 15-8342

________________ 

### Dr. James Eric McDonough ,

Appellant,
vs. 

### Alejandro Murguido, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes Simon, Judge. Dr. James Eric McDonough, in proper person. Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Eric L. Stettin (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee. Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. Albanese Popkin Hughes Cove, Inc. v. Scharlin, 141 So. 3d 743, 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“A trial court’s award of costs is reviewed by appellate courts for an abuse of discretion.”); In re Amends. to Unif. Guidelines for Tax’n of Costs, 915 So. 2d 612, 616 (Fla. 2005) (stating that the test for awarding costs is whether “all requested costs were reasonably necessary either to defend or prosecute the case at the time the action precipitating the cost was taken.”); Markowski v. N. Broward Hosp. Dist., 894 So. 2d 1077, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (allowing the “taxation of costs for depositions ‘used to successfully support a Motion for Summary Judgment’” pursuant to the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs (quoting Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So. 2d 1346, 1349 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983))).
Ceasar GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-84

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 20, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla H. McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, J.

Ceasar Gonzalez appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for attempted aggravated battery and battery, as lesser-included offenses of attempted second-degree murder and domestic battery by strangulation. We affirm.

First, Gonzalez asserts that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence a prior act of domestic violence involving the same victim. We find the prior act was properly admitted into evidence to prove motive, intent, or absence of mistake or accident, and the trial court provided a limiting instruction and restricted the scope of inquiry into the prior act to prevent unfair prejudice. *Burgal v. State*, 740 So.2d 82, 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ("[T]he prior incidents of domestic violence by [defendant] against the victim were properly admitted into evidence to prove motive, intent, and premeditation."); *see* §§ 90.404(2) and 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2018).

Second, Gonzalez contends that his dual convictions for attempted aggravated battery and battery violate double jeopardy principles. As both convictions require "proof of a different element," and the two convictions are based on separate acts, we find no double jeopardy violation. *Blockburger v. United States*, 284 U.S. 299, 304, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932) ; *see also**Pizzo v. State*, 945 So.2d 1203, 1206 (Fla. 2006) ("A defendant is placed in double jeopardy where based upon the same conduct the defendant is convicted of two offenses, each of which does not require proof of a different element."); § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (2018) (codifying the *Blockburger* elements test where the Legislature does not clearly provide for separate punishments); *Khianthalat v. State*, 974 So.2d 359, 361 (Fla. 2008) ("The elements of simple battery are: (1) actually and intentionally touching or striking another person; and (2) against the will of the other person."), *citing* § 784.03(1)(a)(1), Fla. Stat.; *Washington v. State*, 912 So.2d 344, 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("[A]ttempted aggravated battery is committed when a person commits an attempted battery and *either* intends to cause great bodily harm *or* uses a deadly weapon."), *citing* § 784.045 Fla. Stat. and *State v. Carswell*, 914 So.2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentence.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JAMES LEE COKER,

Petitioner,

VS.

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division,

Respondent.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-1236-G

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and

the findings and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the findings and

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby accepted as

the findings of the court. 

SO ORDERED.

August 23, 2005.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01236-G Document 17 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 63
Lisa Marie KORN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Kevin J. RAMBOSK, Sheriff, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 11, 2019

FLORIDA DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Denied.
Exhibit
23.2 Consent of Independent Auditors We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-119501 and 333-33780) pertaining to the 1997
Stock Option and Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended, of Robocom
Systems International Inc. of our reports dated September 13, 2006 and June 27,
2008 with respect to the financial statements of Robocom Systems International
Inc. included in the Annual Reports on Form 10-KSB for the years ended May 31,
2007 and 2008, respectively. /s/ Eisner
  & Lubin, LLPNew York,
  New YorkJune 27,
  2008 34
EX PARTE David KIMBROUGH

1160936 (CR-16-0358)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 128 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 128

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Sergeant at 
                   Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2021

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Sergeant at 
                   Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives be notified of the 
election of the Honorable Karen H. Gibson as Sergeant at Arms and 
Doorkeeper of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
Jump to main content


Federal Communications Commission
                            Browse by
                                        **Category**
                                Browse by
                                        **Bureaus & Offices**Menu
                    About the FCC
                                    Proceedings & Actions
                                    Licensing & Databases
                                    Reports & Research
                                    News & Events
                                    For ConsumersConsumer
                                    Enforcement
                                    International
                                    Media
                                    Public Safety
                                    Wireless
                                    Wireline
                                    Offices  Federal Communications Commission
                                        45 L Street NE
                                        Washington, DC 20554
                                    Phone: 1-888-225-5322
                                        ASL Video Call: 1-844-432-2275
                                        ASL Video Call: Web
                                        Fax: 1-866-418-0232
                                        Contact UsTwitter
                                        Facebook
                                        Youtube
                                        Instagram
                                Website Policies & Notices
                                        Privacy Policy
                                        FOIA
                                        No Fear Act Data
                                        FCC Digital Strategy
                                        Open Government Directive
                                        Plain Writing Act
                                        RSS Feeds & Email Updates
                                        Disability Rights
                                CATEGORIES
                                        About the FCC
                                        Proceedings & Actions
                                        Licensing & Databases
                                        Reports & Research
                                        News & Events
                                        For Consumers
                                BUREAUS & OFFICES
                                        Consumer
                                        Enforcement
                                        Inspector General
                                        International
                                        Media
                                        Public Safety
                                        Wireless
                                        Wireline
                                        Offices
                            Federal Communications Commission
Exhibit 32.0



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Carolyn M. MrozCarolyn M. MrozPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2005By:

/s/ Edmund T. LeonardEdmund T. LeonardChairman of the Board and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2005