alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 59 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 59

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
military sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates of certain 
                     defense articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2022

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
military sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates of certain 
                     defense articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates is 
prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 22-32, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on August 2, 2022: ninety-six (96) 
        Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile rounds; two 
        (2) THAAD Launch Control Stations (LCS); and two (2) THAAD 
        Tactical Operations Stations (TOS); Repair and return, system 
        integration and checkout, and spare and repair parts; support 
        and testing equipment; publications and technical 
        documentation; construction activities; encryption devices; 
        secure communication equipment; other required COMSEC 
        equipment; and other related elements of logistical and program 
        support.
                                 <all>
```
Case 4:05-cv-00827-A Document 22 Filed 10/30/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 95
 

 Case 4:05-cv-00827-A Document 22 Filed 10/30/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 96
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 6, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60064 Summary Calendar

SALWA ZINHOUM MOHAMED ELBASHLLI,

Petitioner,

versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A78 582 197

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Salwa Zinhoum Mohamed Elbashll i petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Imm igration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) decision to deny her applicati on for asylum and withh olding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act ( INA) as well as the Convention Against Torture
(CAT). Elbashlli argues that the BIA erred in determining that she
had not established entitlement to asylum and withho lding of
removal under both the INA and the CAT.No. 04-60064 -2- This court will uphold the factual findings that an alien is

not eligible for asylum or withholding of removal if those findings

are supported by substant ial evidence. C hun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76,
78-79 (5th Cir. 1994). The substantial evidence standard requires that the decision be based on the evidence presented and that the
decision be substantially reasonable. C arbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78
F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The BIA’s decision is supported by

s ubstantial evidence, and the record does not compel a contrary
conclusion as to either Elbashlli’s INA claims or her CAT claim.

See id. Accordingly, Elbashlli’s petition for review is DENIED.
JOINT STATUS REPORT 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Adam Wolek (pro hac vice) 

Brian Noack (pro hac vice) 

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 

111 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 2800 

Chicago, Illinois 60601-3713 

Tel: 312.527.4063 

Fax: 312.966.8598 

awolek@taftlaw.com 

DAVID A. MAKMAN (SBN 178195)

david@makmanlaw.com

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. MAKMAN 

655 Mariner’s Island Blvd, Suite 306 

San Mateo, CA 94404 

Telephone: (650) 242-1560 

Facsimile: (408) 716-3052 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Parkridge Ltd. and Mabel Mak 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

On Behalf of PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a Hong 

Kong corporation, by Mabel Mak, and MABEL 

MAK, an individual, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation, and 

PRAVEEN NARRA KUMAR, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 16-cv-07387-KAW 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

Date: July 17, 2017 

Time: N/A 

Dept.: N/A 

Judge: Hon. Kandis A. Westmore 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 29 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 3
 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Parties respectfully submit the following Joint Status Report pursuant to Docket 24 in 

the above captioned case. The Parties have filed for arbitration pursuant to the Court’s order, which 

is currently pending. 

Separately, Plaintiffs maintain that this Court had jurisdiction over these matters, dispute 

that any arbitrator has jurisdiction over these matters, as further indicated in their filings (see, e.g., 

Docket Nos. 1 and 19), and reserve all rights hereto.1

DATED: July 17, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Adam Wolek 

Adam Wolek (pro hac vice) 

Brian Noack (pro hac vice) 

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 

111 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 2800 

Chicago, Illinois 60601-3713 

Tel: 312.527.4063 

Fax: 312.966.8598 

awolek@taftlaw.com 

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. MAKMAN 

David A. Makman, SBN 178195 

david@makmanlaw.com 

Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS 

DATED: July 17, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

STRUCTURE LAW GROUP, LLP 

By:/s/ Adrian Lambie (with permission) 

Adrian Lambie, Esq. 

Archer Norris 

alambie@archernorris.com 

2033 North Main Street, Suite 800 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Attorney for DEFENDANTS 

 

1

 This paragraph is only on behalf of Plaintiffs. 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 29 Filed 07/17/17 Page 2 of 3
 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that, on July 17, 2017, he caused this document to be 

electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification 

of filing to counsel of record for each party. 

Dated: July 17, 2017 Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP 

 

By:/s/ Adam Wolek 

 Adam Wolek 

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW Document 29 Filed 07/17/17 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Horizon Lines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 25, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Mark Urbania, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/s/    M. MARK URBANIA                           
|M. Mark Urbania                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                    
|                                                 
|November 2, 2005                                 



42
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nelson Stark,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Nelson Stark
----------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer
August 1, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, each of the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lifeline Systems, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 4, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Ronald Feinstein                                          
|                      |  |  |  | Ronald Feinstein                                              
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President                         
|                      |  | 
|Dated: August 4, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Mark G. Beucler                                           
|                      |  |  |  | Mark G. Beucler                                               
|                      |  |  |  | Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00516

- CV Kyle KELLAR , Appellant

v. AGGREGATE HAULERS I, AGGREGATE HAULERS I, L.P. , Appellee From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 08738 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 22, 2014
DIS MISSED On October 2, 2013, appellant’s motion to abate this appeal was granted for purposes of pursuing a settlement. On January 10, 2014, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal , stating that the parties have settled . The motion contains a certificate of service to appellee, which has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we reinstate the appeal on the docket of this court, grant the
motion , and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.
PER CURIAM
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 993 

To prohibit certain business concerns from receiving assistance from the 

Small Business Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Ms. ERNST, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 

Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain business concerns from receiving assistance from the Small Business Administration, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing SBA As5 sistance from Going to China Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 993 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AFFILIATION WITH THE PEOPLE’S 

2 REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(a) of the Small Busi4 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(10) PROHIBITION ON AFFILIATION WITH THE

7 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.—For purposes of 

8 this Act, a small business concern may not— 

9 ‘‘(A) be headquartered in the People’s Re10 public of China; or 

11 ‘‘(B) have more than 25 percent of the vot12 ing stock of the small business concern owned 

13 by affiliates that are citizens of the People’s Re14 public of China.’’. 

15 (b) REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE.—The Adminis16 trator of the Small Business Administration shall amend 

17 the regulations and guidance of the Administration, in18 cluding sections 120.100, 120.110, and 121.105 of title 

19 13, Code of Federal Regulations, to carry out the amend20 ment made by this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Carolyn M. MrozCarolyn M. MrozPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2006By:

/s/ Edmund T. LeonardEdmund T. LeonardChairman of the Board and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARCO A. ZAPATA-RODRIGUEZ )

)

V. ) 3-06-CV-21-K

)

MICHAEL ELSEY, ET AL )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF 

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge William F. Sanderson, Jr., made findings, conclusions

and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a

de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which

objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court accepts the Findings,

Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 30th day of May , 2006.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00021-K Document 18 Filed 05/30/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 129
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Kendle International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Candace Kendle, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 15, 2004

/s/ Candace Kendle
----------------------------
Candace Kendle
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kendle International Inc. and will be retained by Kendle
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
BTXN 221 (rev. 09/22)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

In Re: §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Goodman Networks, Inc. and Goodman Networks Inc

d/b/a Goodman Solutions

Debtor(s)

 Case No.: 22−31641−mvl7

 Chapter No.: 7

Scott M. Seidel et al.

Plaintiff(s) Adversary No.: 23−03036−mvl

 vs.

James Frinzi et al. Civil Case No.: 3:23−CV−02739−L

Defendant(s)

Scott M. Seidel et al.

Plaintiff(s)

 vs.

James Frinzi et al.

Defendant(s)

NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I am transmitting:

One copy of: Report and Recommendation .

DATED: 3/22/24 FOR THE COURT:

Robert P. Colwell, Clerk of Court

by: /s/Sheniqua Whitaker, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:23-cv-02739-L Document 2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID 42

Case 23-03036-mvl Doc 66 Filed 03/22/24 Entered 03/22/24 13:14:10 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Jerry V. MARINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4091

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

Jerry V. Marino, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See* Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b) ; *Brito v. State*, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 2/4/97 TENTH CIRCUIT

CRAIG MILES GOODWIN, a/k/a Curtis Meyer, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAROLD CARMEL, DR.; ALBERT O. SINGLETON, III, M.D.; MARY LOU JUDISCAK; LOU BROTHERS; KEN TAFOYA, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-1084 (D.C. No. 95-Z-1236) (District of Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge; PORFILIO and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. **See** Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.- 2 -

Craig Miles Goodwin appeals from an order granting summary judgment on his complaint alleging certain civil rights violations. We have examined the record and agree with the recommendations of the magistrate judge and the subsequent holdings of the district court in substantial part and affirm those holdings essentially for the reasons cited in the dispositive orders. Although the district court correctly dismissed Mr. Goodwin’s claim alleging denial of access to the courts, we affirm on a different basis. In his complaint, and here on appeal, Mr. Goodwin contends his right of access was denied because his legal materials were taken away from him; he was not able to mail legal documents; he was not able to use legal books for research; and, while admitting consultation with a legal consultant, he was unable to obtain satisfaction from that person, and was not provided with the services of a lawyer. These alleged deprivations notwithstanding, Mr. Goodwin has not alleged any consequences occurred because of them. He has not claimed, for example, that he was unable to meet a filing deadline in a court and the time has passed; nor has he suggested he was deprived of the opportunity to file an action which is now barred. Indeed, he has not related those alleged deprivations to any legal action, pending or contemplated. In short, he merely alleges a generic claim of deprivations which were inconsequential. Such assertions do not reach constitutional proportions and are properly dismissed. See Lewis v. Casey, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 1278-82 (1996).- 3 -

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Georgetown  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert E. Balletto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Joseph W. Kennedy, Senior Vice President,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  act of 2002 and in  connection  with this
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB,  that we have reviewed the Form 10-QSB and that
to the best of our knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of sections 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the Company's  financial  condition and results of
          operations.


Date: December 23, 2004                   /s/ Robert E. Balletto
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Robert E. Balletto
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Chief Executive Officer)


                                          /s/ Joseph W. Kennedy
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Joseph W. Kennedy
                                          Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Accounting and Financial
                                           Officer)