alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 70 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service relating to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and 

Plants; Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 

Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and Endangered 

Status for the Southern Distinct Population Segment’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2022 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mr. INHOFE) 

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to 

‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Lesser 

Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 4(d) 

Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment and 

Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Population 

Segment’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the DiVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:22 Dec 22, 2022 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ70.IS SJ70

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 70 IS 

1 rector of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relat2 ing to ‘‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 

3 Lesser Prairie-Chicken; Threatened Status With Section 

4 4(d) Rule for the Northern Distinct Population Segment 

5 and Endangered Status for the Southern Distinct Popu6 lation Segment’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 72674 (November 25, 

7 2022)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
RESOLUTIONS



 






Exhibit 10.2




ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.




RESOLUTIONS OF THE

COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ADOPTED ON JUNE 4, 2003



     RESOLVED, that Section 1 of each of the Restricted Stock Agreements dated
December 1, 1999, as amended June 6, 2001, December 3, 1997, as amended June 6,
2001, and December 6, 1995, as amended December 5, 1996 and June 6, 2001,
between this Corporation and D. H. Davis, Jr. (the “Restricted Stock
Agreements”) with respect to grants of an aggregate of 39,458 shares of this
Corporation’s Common Stock as restricted stock (the “Restricted Shares”) in
payment of awards under this Corporation’s Annual Incentive Compensation Plan
for Senior Executive Officers, and Stock Dividends (as therein defined) on
those Restricted Shares, is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:





	1.	 	Earnings of Restricted Shares





	 	(a)	 	If (i) you shall continue as an employee of the Corporation
until January 31, 2005; or (ii) you shall die or suffer a disability
that shall continue for a continuous period of at least six months
prior to January 31, 2005; or (iii) a “Change of Control” (as
defined for purposes of Article III, Section 13(I)(1) of the
Corporation’s By-Laws) shall occur; then you shall be deemed to have
fully earned all the Restricted Shares subject to this Agreement.
	 
	 	(b)	 	If your employment by the Corporation terminates prior to
January 31, 2005, you shall be deemed not to have earned any of the
Restricted Shares and shall have no further rights with respect
thereto unless the Board of Directors or the Committee shall
determine, in its sole discretion, that your earlier retirement from
service with the Corporation is in the best interests of the
Corporation.



; and further



     RESOLVED, that the officers of this Corporation be, and each of them is,
authorized and empowered, in the name and on behalf of this Corporation, to
take or cause to be taken such action or actions and to execute and deliver or
cause to be executed and delivered such agreements, instruments, certificates
and other documents, as they may deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the
purpose and intent of the foregoing resolution.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Bradley Operating Limited Partnership(“Bradley OP”) for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,David G. Gaw, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe sole stockholder of the general partner of Bradley OP, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andthe results of operations of Bradley OP.

March 30,2006
|        | /s/  DAVID  G. GAW                                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David G. Gaw*Senior Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

----
Discounts & Bundles

Visit the link below for available billing discounts and pricing 

options for broadband service bundled with other services like 

video, phone, and wireless service, and use of your own 

equipment like modems and routers.

https://www.example.com/discounts

Additional Charges & Terms

Provider Monthly Fees

One-Time Purchase Fees 

Early Termination Fee 

Government Taxes 

Modem Rental $10.00

Wifi Extender $5.00

Installation

Battery Back-up

$100.00

$50.00

$27.57

$75.00

Monthly Price

This monthly price is an introductory rate 

Time the introductory rate applies

Monthly price after the introductory rate

Length of contract 

Link to Terms of Contract 

$89.99

12 months

$109.99

24 months

https://www.example.com/terms-of-contract

Yes

Broadband Facts

Acme Wired

Signature Plan/Gigabit 

Fixed Broadband Consumer Disclosure

Speeds Provided with Plan

Typical Download Speed 

Charges for Additional Data Usage

Data Included with Monthly Price

Typical Upload Speed

Typical Latency 

Mbps

Mbps

ms

n/a

GB

1,200

200

47

1,000

https://www.example.com/data-usage

Network Management Policy 

Customer Support 

Learn about the terms used on this label. Visit the Federal 

Communications Commission’s Consumer Resource Center.

Phone:

Website:

Unique Plan Identifier: F0005937974123ABC456EMC789

Privacy Policy

(555) 555-5555

https://www.example.com/privacy

https://www.example.com/network-management

https://www.example.com

fcc.gov/consumer
# C_2016462EN.01003301.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/33

---

Action brought on 13 October 2016 — VFP v Commission

(Case T-726/16)

(2016/C 462/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vlaamse Federatie van Persverkopers VZW (VFP) (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: P. de Bandt, J. Dewispelaere and J. Probst, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible;

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission of 3 June 2016, State Aid SA.42366 (2016/N) — Belgium — State compensations to bpost for the delivery of public services over 2016-2020 (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission of 3 June 2016, State Aid SA.42366 (2016/N) — Belgium — State compensations to bpost for the delivery of public services over 2016-2020 (1);

1

| — | refer the case back to the Commission for further investigation and a new decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the Commission for further investigation and a new decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs; and

| — | take such other or further actions as justice may require. |
| --- | --- |

—

take such other or further actions as justice may require.

Plea in law and main arguments

Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one single plea in law alleging that the European Commission has violated its procedural rights by adopting the contested decision and not opening the formal procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU.

In this single plea it is explained that, in so far as the Commission encountered serious difficulties as regards the possible compatibility of the compensation for the press distribution Service of General Economic Interest (‘SGEI’) with the internal market, it was under the legal obligation to adopt a decision initiating the formal investigation procedure. This single plea is divided in four limbs. In particular, it is argued that the existence of the serious difficulties results from a body of consistent evidence concerning (i) the length of the preliminary examination and the special circumstances under which the aid was granted (first limb), (ii) the fact that the Commission’s analysis of the qualification of the distribution of recognised newspapers and periodicals as an SGEI is insufficient (second limb), (iii) the fact that the Commission’s analysis of the beneficiaries of the press distribution SGEI is incomplete (third limb) and (iv) the fact that the Commission’s analysis of the distortion of competition and the development of trade is incomplete and insufficient (fourth limb).

---

(1)  OJ 2016, C 341, p. 5.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Champps Entertainment, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 3, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2005 (the Report), I, Michael P. ODonnell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                      |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: September 6, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael P. ODonnell            
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Michael P. ODonnell                
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | President and ChiefExecutive Officer
B.M. v. CLEBURNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2161005

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kathleen P. McSherry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy M
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated:  April 5, 2007

   /s/  KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
 Name:  Kathleen P. McSherry

Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 24 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 24

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1605, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In the table in section 2301(a), in the item relating 
        to Eielson Air Force Base, strike ``$44,850,00'' in the amount 
        column and insert ``$44,850,000''.
            (2) In section 4601, in the table relating to Military 
        Construction, Navy, in the item relating to AEGIS Ashore 
        Barracks Planning and Design in Redzikowo, Poland, insert ``0'' 
        in the Conference Authorized column.

            Passed the Senate December 18 (legislative day, December 
      17), 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 24

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the 
                    enrollment of the bill S. 1605.
```
FCC Form 5625****Main Form

**Connect America Phase II New York**

***Long-Form Application—Main Form***

# OMB Approved 3060-1241

# Estimated Time Per Response: 4 hours

# February 2018

**Read instructions thoroughly before completing this form. Failure to comply may cause delayed or denied funding.**

Persons willfully making false statements on this form can be punished by fine or forfeiture under the Communications Act, 47

U.S.C. Secs. 502, 503(b), or fine or imprisonment under Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001.

**FCC NOTICE FOR INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT AND THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT**

Part 3 of the Commission’s Rules authorize the FCC to request the information on this form. The purpose of the information is to determine whether applicants can meet the terms and conditions of Connect America Phase II support. The information will be used by the Universal Service Administrative Company and/or the staff of the Federal Communications Commission, to evaluate this form, to provide information for enforcement and rulemaking proceedings and to maintain a current inventory of applicants. No authorization can be granted unless all information requested is provided. Failure to provide all requested information will delay the processing of the application or result in the application being returned without action. Information requested by this form will be available for public inspection. Your response is required to obtain the requested authorization.

The public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 4 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the required data, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. If you have any comments on this burden estimate, or how we can improve the collection and reduce the burden it causes you, please write to the Federal Communications Commission, AMD-PERM, Paperwork Reduction Act Project (3060-1241), Washington, DC 20554. We will also accept your comments regarding the Paperwork Reduction Act aspects of this collection via the Internet if you send them to pra@fcc.gov. PLEASE DO NOT

SEND YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS ADDRESS.

Remember - You are not required to respond to a collection of information sponsored by the Federal government, and the government may not conduct or sponsor this collection, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number or if we fail to provide you with this notice. This collection has been assigned an OMB control number of 3060-1241.

THE FOREGOING NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974, PUBLIC LAW 93-579, DECEMBER 31, 1974, 5

U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) AND THE PAPEWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995, PUBLIC LAW 104-13, OCTOBER 1, 1995, 44 U.S.C. SECTION 3507.

FCC Form 5625****Schedule A

**Connect America Phase II New York**

***Long-Form Application—Disclosable Interest Holder Information***

FCC Form [[xxxx]]
Kala MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-283

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

HOWARD BRIDGES, JR.,

Plaintiff,

VS.

UNKNOWN DISTRICT/REGIONAL

MANAGER, ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-1187-G

)

) ECF

)

)

ORDER

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the

undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the

Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of

the court.

SO ORDERED.

March 1, 2006.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01187-G Document 10 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 40
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131913 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131913 COA: 267931 Wayne CC: 93-010813 JESSEELEE HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 2, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40833

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GRABIEL TORRES-GARCIA, also known as Victor-Jose Gomez-Garcia, also

known as Miguel Antonio Aldana-Garcia

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:05-CR-2358-ALL

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Grabiel Torres-Garcia appeals his 70-month sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction to illegal reentry into the United States following

deportation. Torres-Garcia concedes that his prior convictions under Cal. Health

& Safety Code § 11351.5, based on his possession for sale and purchase for sale

of cocaine, were drug trafficking offenses within the meaning of U.S.S.G.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-40833

2

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) and that the district court did not plainly err in making a 16-

level adjustment to his offense level under that Guideline. 

Because Torres-Garcia did not objectto the characterization of the offense

in the district court, review is for plain error. See United States v. Ochoa-Cruz,

442 F.3d 865, 866-67 (5th Cir. 2006). “Plain error exists when: (1) there was an

error; (2) the error was clear and obvious; and (3) the error affected the

defendant’s substantial rights.” Id. at 866 (quotation marks omitted).

Under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i), a 16-level increase is applied if the defendant

was deported after a felony conviction that is “a drug trafficking offense for

which the sentence imposed exceeded 13 months.” In United States v. PalaciosQuinonez, 431 F.3d 471, 473-76 (5th Cir. 2005), the court determined that a

purchase for purposes of sale of cocaine is a drug trafficking offense within the

meaning of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i). Torres-Garcia admits that he pleaded guilty to

that offense and that he received a sentence exceeding 13 months. Therefore,

the district court did not plainly err in making the adjustment.

The district court correctly calculated the guidelines range and did not

abuse its discretion in imposing sentence at the bottom of the sentencing

guidelines range. Therefore, the sentence was substantively reasonable. See

Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 596-97 (2007).

AFFIRMED.