Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2535-130]

      ( print page 7687)    
On October 27, 2023, Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. (Dominion Energy), filed a final license application to relicense its Stevens Creek Hydroelectric Project No. 2535. On November 8, 2023, Commission staff issued a notice of application and solicited additional study requests. On December 11, 2023, Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia, filed additional study requests with the Commission. On November 25, 2024, Commission staff issued a letter responding to the additional study requests and explained that no further studies were needed. On December 26, 2024, Augusta-Richmond County filed a request for rehearing of Commission staff's November 25, 2024 letter.

                    Rule 713(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure permits requests for rehearing “of any final decision or other final order in a proceeding.” [1]                                          An order is final, and thus subject to rehearing, only when it imposes an obligation, denies a right, or fixes some legal relationship as a consummation of the administrative process.[2]                                          The November 24, 2024 Commission staff letter is not a final Commission decision or order on the final license application, which remains pending before the Commission, nor imposes an obligation on the license applicant or any other party.                

                    When the Commission, or its delegate, issues a final order regarding Dominion Energy's license application, Augusta-Richmond County may, at that time, file a request for rehearing. Thus, Commission staff's November 25, 2024 letter is interlocutory and does not fall within the scope of Rule 713. Accordingly, the request for rehearing is dismissed.[3] 

                    This notice constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing by the Commission of this notice must be filed within 30 days of the date of issuance of this notice, as provided in section 313(a) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825*l*                    (a), and section 385.713 of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR 385.713 (2024).                

Dated: January 14, 2025.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 385.713(b) (2024);                         *see also*15 U.S.C. 717r(a) (parties “aggrieved by an order issued by the Commission in a proceeding . . . may apply for a rehearing within thirty days after the issuance of such order”).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                                                     *Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Co.*                         v.                         *Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n,*                         324 F.3d 726, 731 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (holding that “final agency action `mark[s] the consummation of the agency's decision-making process' and is `one by which rights or obligations have been determined, or from which legal consequences will flow' ”) (quoting                         *Bennett*                         v.                         *Spear,*                         520 U.S. 154, 178 (1997)).                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See, e.g., Exelon Gen Co.,*                         131 FERC ¶ 61,166, at PP 15-16 (2010) (denying rehearing of a study plan determination letter, in part, because letter was a procedural decision by Commission staff);                         *Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Douglas Cnty., Wash.,*                         122 FERC ¶ 61,032, at P 7 & n.9 (2008) (dismissing request for rehearing of denial of study request);                         *Duke Power,*                         117 FERC ¶ 61,303, at PP 5-7 (2006) (affirming dismissal as interlocutory of request for rehearing of environmental assessment);                         *Duke Energy Corp.,*                         111 FERC ¶ 61,489, at PP 12-14 (2005) (denying request for rehearing of Secretary's notice dismissing request for rehearing of staff decision not to extend environmental scoping process).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2025-01430 Filed 1-21-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P