alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Georgetown  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
E. Balletto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph
W. Kennedy, Senior Vice President,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  and in  connection  with  this
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB,  that we have reviewed the Form 10-QSB and that
to the best of our knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the Company's financial condition and results of
        operations as of the date and for the periods covered by the Report.


Date: May 12, 2006              /s/ Robert E. Balletto
                                -----------------------------------
                                Robert E. Balletto
                                President and Chief Executive Officer
                                (Chief Executive Officer)


                                /s/ Joseph W. Kennedy
                                Joseph W. Kennedy
                                Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
                                Financial Officer
                                (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)



                                       19
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134249 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DALE OSBURN, INC., OSBURN INDUSTRIES, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, INC., and TRUCKWAY SERVICES, INC. OF Justices MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 134249 

 COA: 267927 

Wayne CC: 98-836716-CK 

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

GARAN, LUCOW, MILLER & SEWARD, P.C.,

f/k/a GARAN, LUCOW, SEWARD, COOPER &

BECKER, P.C., and THOMAS L. MISURACA, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
John Joseph MCCARTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4690

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Mark J. O'Brien, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
1 The fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) states that the “court shall have

power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment

affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without

remanding the cause for a rehearing.” See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89

(1991). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

SARAH BEACOM §

§

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:04-CV-454-Y

§

JO ANNE B. BARNHART §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 8, 2005, the United States magistrate judge issued

his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“findings

and conclusions”) in the above-styled and -numbered cause. An

order issued that same day gave all parties until August 29, 2005,

to serve and file with the Court written objections to the proposed

findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge. The Court has

not received any written objections. As a result, in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required.

Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s

findings and conclusions for plain error and has found none. 

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court finds that

the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and

are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the

Commissioner is REVERSED and the action REMANDED, pursuant to the

fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),1 for further administrative

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00454-Y Document 22 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 79
2

proceedings for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s

findings and conclusions.

SIGNED August 31, 2005.

TRM/kat

 

 Case 4:04-cv-00454-Y Document 22 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 80
T.F., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-582

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                     PRECISION AUTO CARE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----------                                                -----------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>
Hydro Spray Car Wash Equipment Co., Ltd.                  Iowa
Indy Ventures L.L.C.                                      Indiana
KBG, LLC                                                  Colorado
Miracle Industries, Inc.                                  Ohio
Miracle Partners, Inc.                                    Delaware
National 60 Minute Tune, Inc.                             Washington
PAC Acquisition LLC                                       Virginia
PAC Mexican Delaware Holding Company, Inc.                Delaware
PAC Mexican Holding Company LLC                           Virginia
Praxis Afinaciones Puerto Rico, Inc.                      Puerto Rico
Praxis Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V.                          Mexico
Praxis AutoPartes, S.A. de C.V.                           Mexico
Precision Auto Care Mexico I, S. de R.L. de C.V.          Mexico
Precision Auto Care Mexico II, S. de R.L. de C.V.         Mexico
Precision Building Solutions Incorporated                 Delaware
Precision Tune Auto Care, Inc.                            Virginia
Prema Properties Ltd.                                     Ohio
Premier Accesorios, S.A. de C.V.                          Mexico
Promotora de Franquicias Praxis S.A. de C.V.              Mexico
PTW, Inc.                                                 Washington
Ralston Car Wash, Ltd.                                    Colorado
Rocky Mountain Ventures II, Inc.                          Colorado
Rocky Mountain Ventures, Inc.                             Colorado
Sixar Afinaciones Puerto Rico, Inc.                       Puerto Rico
Sixar Afinaciones, S.A. de C.V.                           Mexico
Sixar Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V.                           Mexico
Sixar Occidente, S.A. de C.V.                             Mexico
WE JAC Corporation                                        Delaware
Worldwide Drying Systems, Inc.                            Colorado
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hemobiotech, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Arthur P. Bollon, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|a. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                      
|b. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
theCompany.
|                                                                                                                                                      

|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Arthur P. Bollon, Ph.D.   | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | 
|                       
|                       
|                        |  |                               | 
|                       
|                        |  | Arthur P. Bollon, Ph.D.       | 
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer       | 
|                        |  | (PRINCIPAL
 EXECUTIVEOFFICER) | 
|                        |  |                               | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 69 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to abolish 

the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of the President 

and Vice President of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the 

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to abolish the electoral college and to provide 

for the direct election of the President and Vice President of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 69 IS 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE — 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The President and Vice President shall 

3 be jointly elected by the direct popular vote of the people 

4 of the several States and the District constituting the seat 

5 of Government of the United States who are over the age 

6 of 18. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall determine the time, 

8 place, and manner of holding the election, and the manner 

9 in which the results of the election shall be ascertained 

10 and declared, and shall establish one day throughout the 

11 United States by which any period of voting shall be com12 plete and during which any eligible voter may cast a vote. 

13 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have the power to en14 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Financial Condition

March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

(unaudited)

March 31

2012

December 31

2011

Assets

 Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 129,371,996 $ 1,100,764

 Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 3,254,456,448 3,266,285,063

 Accrued Interest Receivable 19,857,904 26,264,304

 Premiums Receivable 21,552,000 98,699,000

Total Assets $ 3,425,238,348 $ 3,392,349,131

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

 Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $ 285,181 $ 385,325

 Farm Credit Insurance Fund

 Allocated Insurance Reserves Accounts

 Allocated in 2011 221,851,220 221,851,220

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 3,203,101,947 3,170,112,586

 Total Insurance Fund 3,424,953,167 3,391,963,806

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $ 3,425,238,348 $ 3,392,349,131
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Revenue and Expense

For the Period Ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011

(unaudited)

Calendar Year To Date

March 31, 2012

Calendar Year To Date

March 31, 2011

Income

 Premiums $ 21,580,000 $ 24,711,000

 Interest Income on Investments 12,208,133 18,826,820

Total Income $ 33,788,133 $ 43,537,820

Expenses

 Administrative Operating Expenses $ 798,772 $ 778,654

Total Expenses $ 798,772 $ 778,654

Net Income $ 32,989,361 $ 42,759,166

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund 

For Period Ended March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

Balance at January 1, 2012 $ 3,391,963,806

Net Income 32,989,361

Balance at December 31, 2011 $ 3,424,953,167
Alvin D. CLAYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4901

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**I, Paul O. Bower, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Education Realty Trust, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated this*10*th day of August, 2006.                           /s/ Paul O. Bower   Paul O. Bower   Chief Executive Officer
Michele T. SCHENDEN, Appellant, v. Timothy SCHENDEN and Michele Tamaccio Schenden Revocable Trust, dated December 7, 2012 Co-Trustees Michele T. Schenden and Timothy Schenden, Appellees.

No. 4D18-3655

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 25, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

TOMMY LEE HIGHTOWER, JR., 1038986, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:06-CV-456-N

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, )

Correctional Institutions Division )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed May 16, 2007.

_________________________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:06-cv-00456-N Document 15 Filed 05/16/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 80
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ DORIS E. POOLE, Claimant

- Appellant

v.

ROBERT WILKIE , SECRETARY OF VETERAN S AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2017

- 1840

______________________ Appeals from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 16

- 3079, Judge Mary J. Schoelen, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch, Judge William S. Greenberg.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

C HRIS A TTIG , Attig Steel, PLLC, Little Rock, AR, a rgued for claimant

- appellant.

I GOR H ELMAN , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washin gton, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represen ted by K RISTIN M C G RORY , E LIZABETH M ARIE H OSFORD , R OBERT E DWARD K IRSCHMAN , J R ., C HAD A. R EADLER ; B RIAN D. G RIFFIN , B RYAN T HOMPSON , Office of GeneralCounsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs

, Washington, DC

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , L INN , and D YK , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Ci r. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 3, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140891

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140891 COA: 288255 Muskegon CC: 08-056234-FC MARCUS TULEKUN BOLDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 11, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 5:17-cv-00079-HRL Document 2 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 5:17-cv-00079-HRL Document 2 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 2
Amy DAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-551

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:05-cv-01946-M Document 23 Filed 02/20/07 Page 1 of 1 PageID 107