alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months end September
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward C. Dillon, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Edward C. Dillon
-----------------------------
Edward C. Dillon
Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2009


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Nelson Stark, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Nelson Stark
-----------------------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

GENEVIEVE RAMIREZ )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-1393-N

)

VAN BUREN, Warden )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed September 26, 2005.

_________________________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01393-N Document 10 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 58
Ronald LEBED, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1128

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-10595

Summary Calendar

_____________________

JOHN ERIC JACKSON, ET AL.,

 Plaintiff,

JOHN ERIC JACKSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RODNEY COOPER, Senior Warden;

B. FORSHEE; GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

TDCJ,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CV-277

_________________________________________________________________

November 27, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Eric Jackson, Texas prisoner #658692, appeals the

magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner civil

rights case. Having reviewed the record and Jackson’s arguments on

appeal, we AFFIRM for essentially the same reasons cited by the

magistrate judge. See Jackson v. Cooper, 1:97-CV-277 (N.D. Tex.

Apr. 29, 1998).
2

A F F I R M E D.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6940

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-JCC; 1:05-cv-00035-JCC) Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 29, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, David Benjamin Joyce, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jamal Mitchell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mitchell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 16, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), DVD Copy Control Association (“DVD CCA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Panasonic Automotive Systems, Co., Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN, has been added as a party to this venture.                

Also, Almedio Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN; Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd., Seoul, SOUTH KOREA; Sharp North Malaysia Sdn Bhd, Sungai Petani-Kedah, MALAYSIA; and Toyo Recording Co., Ltd., Tokyo, JAPAN, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 24, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal                               ( print page 8816)                            Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2024 (89 FR 52094).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-02107 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 

Maysville Marketsquare Associates, L.P. 

NorthCoast Health Center (JV Partnership) 

North Coast Health Center, LLC 

New NCHC, Inc. 

Pan Pacific (Bel Air Village), LLC 

Pan Pacific (Cable Park), LLC 

Pan Pacific (Clackamas), Inc. 

Pan Pacific (Clackamas), LLC 

Pan Pacific (Laguna Park Village), LLC 

Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC 

Pan Pacific (Pinecreek), L.P. 

Pan Pacific (Rancho Las Palmas), LLC 

Pan Pacific (RLP), Inc. 

Pan Pacific (Sunset Mall), LLC 

Pan Pacific Development (Chino), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Kentucky), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (NewMexico), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Olympia Square), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Rosewood), Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee) Acquisition, Inc. 

Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee), L.P. 

Pan Pacific U.S. Shopping CenterI, LP 

Sahara Pavilion North U.S., Inc. 

West Coast PropertyMaintenance, LLC 

Plaza Escuela Holding Co., LLC 

Pan Pacific(CTA), Inc. 

CT Operating Partnership, L.P. 

Willowbrook CenterPartnership 

Haagen Central Partnership 

Vermont-SlausonShopping Center, LTD. 

CT Retail Properties Finance II, LLC 

CTRetail Properties Finance III, LLC 

CT Retail Properties Finance IV, LLC 

CT Retail Properties Finance V, LLC 

CT Retail Properties Finance VI, LLC 

CT Retail Properties Finance 14, LLC
1Tuner’s filing is labeled as a “response,” and although Turner does not

contest the magistrate judge’s recommendation as to dismissal without prejudice,

to the extent the document could be construed as an objection to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation that Turner will still be subject to any applicable

limitations bar, the Court has done a de novo review.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

RONNIE TURNER, §

Petitioner, §

 § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:06-CV-079-Y

 §

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director,§

T.D.C.J., Correctional § 

Institutions Division, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

In this action brought by petitioner Ronnie Turner under 28

U.S.C. § 2254, the Court has made an independent review of the

following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause:

1. The pleadings and record;

2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on

July 12, 2006; and

3. The petitioner's written objections to the proposed

findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United

States magistrate judge filed on July 27, 2006.1

The Court, after de novo review, concludes that Turner’s

objections must be overruled, and that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus should be dismissed for lack of exhaustion for the

reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of

the magistrate judge should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED.

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00079-Y Document 15 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 109
2A one-year statute of limitations is now applicable to the filing of noncapital § 2254 habeas corpus petitions in federal court. See 28 U.S.C.A. §

2244(d)(1-4)(West Supp. 2006). The statute of limitations is tolled, however,

while a properly filed application for state post-conviction or other collateral

review is pending. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d)(2)(West Supp. 2006). 

2

Petitioner Ronnie Turner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus

is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, except as to any application of the

federal statute of limitations or other federal procedural bar that

may apply.2

SIGNED August 10, 2006.

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00079-Y Document 15 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 110
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 29, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8399-8403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01921]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Notice of Finding of Mass Influx of Aliens

AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of Finding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 23, 2025, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security 
signed a Finding of Mass Influx of Aliens. The text of the Finding is 
set out below.

Joseph N. Mazzara,
Acting General Counsel, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
BILLING CODE 9110-9M-P

[[Page 8400]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA25.007

[[Page 8401]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA25.008

[[Page 8402]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA25.009

[[Page 8403]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA25.010

[FR Doc. 2025-01921 Filed 1-24-25; 4:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110-9M-C
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

GLENN WAYNE KELLY )

)

v. ) 3-05-CV-1015-K

)

DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director, )

Texas Department of Criminal Justice )

Correctional Institutions Division )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed this 3rd day of January , 2006.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01015-K Document 19 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 110
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lifeline Systems, Inc.



|                   |  |                                                               
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 5, 2005 |  | /s/ Ronald Feinstein                                          
|                   |  | Ronald Feinstein                                              
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and President                         
|                   | 
|Dated: May 5, 2005 |  | /s/ Mark G. Beucler                                           
|                   |  | Mark G. Beucler                                               
|                   |  | Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification ofPrincipal Executive Officer

 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

  As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Mauceli,principal executive officer of Reef Global Energy IV, L.P., certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date: November 14,  2008 | Reef Oil & Gas  Partners, L.P.        |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Managing General  Partner                      |
|                          |                                           |
|                          | By: Reef Oil &  Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                          |                                           |
|                          | /s/ Michael J. Mauceli                         |
|                          | Michael J. Mauceli                             |
|                          | Manager and Member                             |
|                          | *(principal executive officer)*                |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of § 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by § 906 has been providedto the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Javier MEDINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-949

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Michael Frank Connor, certify that:

          1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all
reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc., on behalf of Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1
Trust;

          2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

          4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

          5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
the compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


Date: March 30, 2004                        /s/Michael Frank Connor
                                            -----------------------
                                            Michael Frank Connor
                                            President
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6997** 

CHARLES M. CASSELL, III , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. FNU DAWKINS, Dr.; DAVID GUINN, P. A. , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. ( 5:14

- cv - 00089

- FDW )

Submitted : January 29, 2015 Decided: April 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles M. Cassell, III seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § § 1915(g), 1915 A(a), (b)(1) (2012)
. Although we conclude that Cassell did not have three qualifying previous “strikes” as necessary to justify dis missal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as the district court found, we nonetheless affirm for the reasons given by the district court for dismissal under § 1915A(a), (b). Cassell v. Dawkins , No. 5:14

- cv - 00089

- FDW (W.D.N.C. June 16, 2014). We dispense with ora l argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 

2, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00481-CV

IN RE CORPORATE NECESSITIES, INC., Relator 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

125th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-07549 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On June 14, 2019, relator Corporate Necessities, Inc. filed a petition for writ 

of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Kyle 
2 

Carter, presiding judge of the 125th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his 

April 9, 2019 and May 21, 2019 orders compelling arbitration. 

Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, 

we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s motion for 

temporary relief. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.