alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 14 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00208
- CV WILLIE G. COOKS, Appellant
V. DISCOVER BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. DC
- 12
- 12257 

### O RDER By postcard dated March 13, 2013, the court reporter was directed to file the reporter’s record within thirty days of the date of the notice. To date, the reporter has not filed the record or otherwise communicated with the Court . Accordingly, we ORDER Deana K. Savage, Official Court Reporter of the 95 th Judicial District Court, to file the record within thirty days of
the date of this order . If no record exists or if a record exists but appellant has not requested it or paid or made arrangements to pay for it, Ms. Savage shall inform the Court in writing within ten (10) days of the date of this order. No extension will be granted absent exigent circumstances.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order b y electronic transmission to Ms. Savage and the Honorable Ken Molberg, Presiding Judge of the 95 th JudicialDistrict Court.
/Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Housing & Land Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 14, 2008                        By:  /s/ LU PINGJI
                                                  -------------
                                                  Lu Pingji
                                                 (Chief Executive Officer)





<PAGE>
February 16, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TRUDELL B. FOWLER AND EPHRAN D. BOYD, Appellants

NO. 14-11-00115-CV V.

SHANNON L. LUND, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Shannon L. Lund, 

signed November 8, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected 

the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We order appellants, Trudell B. Fowler and Ephran D. Boyd, jointly and severally, 

to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for 

observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 55 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 55

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
      United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Council on 
 Environmental Quality relating to ``National Environmental Policy Act 
                 Implementing Regulations Revisions''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2022

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Thune, Mrs. Capito, Mr. 
 Barrasso, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Daines, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Lee, Mr. 
    Toomey, Mr. Paul, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Marshall, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
    Tuberville, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Sasse, Mr. Wicker, Mr. 
   Hagerty, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Risch, Mr. Rounds, Mrs. Hyde-
 Smith, Mr. Scott of Florida, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Johnson, 
  Mr. Lankford, Mr. Romney, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Portman, Mr. Cotton, Mr. 
 Tillis, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Burr, Mr. Shelby, Mrs. Fischer, 
Mr. Moran, Mr. Young, Mr. Graham, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
  Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Braun, and Ms. Collins) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
      United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Council on 
 Environmental Quality relating to ``National Environmental Policy Act 
                 Implementing Regulations Revisions''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Council on Environmental Quality relating to 
``National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations 
Revisions'' (87 Fed. Reg. 23453 (April 20, 2022)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

AMANDA U. AJULUCHUKU §

§

 Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-06-CV-0308-N 

§

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION §

§

Defendant. §

TRANSFER ORDER

This is a pro se civil rights action brought by Amanda U. Ajuluchuku, a disabled AfricanAmerican who resides in Irving, Texas, against Bank of America Corporation, a federally insured

financial institution headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina with branch offices located

throughout the United States. In her complaint, plaintiff alleges that she was discriminated against

by employees of a bank in Seattle, Washington when she was asked to present two forms of

identification to cash a check and then was escorted from the premises by security guards.

Venue in a civil rights action is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). See Davis v. Louisiana

State University, 876 F.2d 412, 413 (5th Cir. 1989). This statute provides that civil cases not

founded solely on diversity of citizenship must be brought in the judicial district where: (1) the

defendant resides; (2) a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred;

or (3) where any defendant may be found if there is no district in which the action may otherwise

be brought. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The court also may transfer a civil action to any proper judicial

district or division "for the convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice." Id.

§ 1404(a); see also Hardwick v. Brinson, 523 F.2d 798, 800 n.2 (5th Cir. 1975).

Case 3:06-cv-00308-N Document 5 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 27
Plaintiff's claim arises out of events that occurred in Seattle, Washington, which lies within

the Western District of Washington. See 28 U.S.C. § 128(b). The bank employees who allegedly

discriminated against plaintiff presumably reside in that district. Accordingly, this case is hereby

transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington "for the

convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 24, 2006.

Case 3:06-cv-00308-N Document 5 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 28
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00014-CR

John Kennedy Green,

aka John Kenneth Graham,

aka John Kenneth Jackson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 64890, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due March 10, 2010. The brief has not been received and

appellant’s appointed attorney, Michael F. White, did not respond to this Court’s notice that the brief

is overdue.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether the attorney it appointed to represent

appellant has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate

findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will

effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all

findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the
Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than June 11, 2010. Tex. R.

App. P. 38.8(b)(3).

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: May 14, 2010

Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit 10.1

Amendment No. 1 to Note

This Amendment to Note (Amendment), made, delivered, and effective as of August 9, 2007, by and
between MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC (Borrower) and COMERICA BANK (Bank).

WHEREAS, Borrower and Bank are parties to that certain
Master Revolving Note in the original principal amount of $3,500,000 dated December 28, 2006 (Note); and

WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower
desire to amend the Note as set forth below;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises contained in this Amendment,
Borrower and Bank agree as follows:



|1. | The Maturity Date of the Note is now April 1, 2009.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------



|2. | The face amount of the Note is increased to CDN $4,500,000.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|3. | The execution of this Amendment shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any Default or Event of Default.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | All the terms used in this Amendment which are defined in the Note shall have the same meaning as used in the Note, unless otherwise defined in this Amendment.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | This Amendment is not an agreement to any further or other amendment of the Note.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|6. | Borrower expressly acknowledges and agrees that except as expressly amended in this Amendment, the Note, as amended, remains in full force and effect and is ratified, confirmed and
restated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment on the date set forth above.



|                      |  |                         |  |      |  |                     
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---- |  | --------------------
|MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC |  | COMERICA BANK          
|                      |  |                         | 
|By:                   |  | David H. Gransee        |  | By:  |  | James Q. Goudie     
|Its:                  |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | Its: |  | Vice President & AGM



---

CONSENT OF GUARANTOR

The undersigned consents to the foregoing amendment as of the date thereof and reaffirms and ratifies all of its obligations to the Bank under its Guaranty of the Indebtedness of the Borrower to the Bank.



MANITEX, LLCBy:

David H. GranseeIts:

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40079

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARMANDO HUERTA-TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-638-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando HuertaTorres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Huerta-Torres has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 28, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40079 Document: 00513695499 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2016
No. 16-40079

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40079 Document: 00513695499 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2016
Roger HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1182

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-27   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 2

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-27   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smartmetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Needelman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated:  November 22, 2010
By:
/s/ Jay NeedelmanJay Needelman (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Chief Financial Officer
Isidro DORADO a/k/a Gilberto Mendez, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal of the summary denial of petitioner's postconviction motion in the trial court is granted in circuit court case numbers 2005-CF-4650 and 2008-CF-3025 for review of the trial court's order of August 28, 2018.

The circuit court clerk shall treat this order as a notice of appeal, promptly certify same and return it to this court as with any notice of appeal, and a new appellate case number will be assigned to this appeal and an acknowledgment letter will issue at that time. The summary record shall be transmitted to this court when the certified copy of this order is returned by the trial court clerk.

After a new appellate case number is assigned and an acknowledgment letter has issued, this court will issue an order advising the appellant of the due date of the optional initial brief.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Daniel Edward CHURCHILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1676

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 25, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 27 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 27

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2021

Mr. Lankford introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may 
                                 serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has served 8 terms as a Representative 
shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For 
purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in 
the House of Representatives shall be included as 1 term in determining 
the number of terms that such person has served as a Representative if 
the person fills the vacancy for more than 1 year.
    ``Section 2. No person who has served 3 terms as a Senator shall be 
eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of 
this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy 
in the Senate shall be included as 1 term in determining the number of 
terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills the 
vacancy for more than 3 years.
    ``Section 3. No term beginning before the date of the ratification 
of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility 
for election or appointment under this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
Making Sense of Data via the Web - A Case Study Using Agricultural Data

Irwin Anolik

National Agricultural Statistics Service, USA

This demonstration illustrates results of research conducted at the National Agricultural Statistics Service

(NASS) to determine ways to disseminate data on the World Wide Web so that data customers can freely

and effectively view and analyze NASS data using any web browser connected to the Internet. Specifically,

we demonstrate web-based solutions that enable viewing, analyzing, and dynamically interacting with

summary data at the state and county level. The demonstration presents important concepts and

technologies that we implement on the NASS web site to enhance the ability to find data of interest, and

see structure and pattern inherent in the data. W e display historical data through the use of animated

maps and charts as well as Asparklines@ as developed by Edward Tufte and described as small graphic

charts that can be inserted within text on a page. W e also display current data using dynamic maps and

charts, and making use of Asmall multiples@, galleries, and multivariate column views; all meant to give

more context and power to the data customer. W hile this demonstration focuses on Agricultural Data, the

principles and methods can be applied to other sources of survey and census data.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 19 (Thursday, January 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01942]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-51-2024]

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 59; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A.; (All-Terrain 
Vehicles); Lincoln, Nebraska

    On September 26, 2024, Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A. 
submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ 
Board for its facility within Subzone 59A, in Lincoln, Nebraska.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (89 FR 80194, October 2, 2024). On 
January 24, 2025, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: January 24, 2025.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01942 Filed 1-29-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```