alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew T. Gibbs II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line, Inc.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 12, 2005



/s/ Matthew T. Gibbs IIMatthew T. Gibbs IIChief Financial Officer and Director(Principal Financial Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.



26
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1098

_____________________________

ULRIC NOVELOZO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman L. Robinson, Judge.

August 29, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jason Cromey of Cromey Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| a.   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                                                                                   |                                                 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                                                   |
|                            |                                                                                              |                                            |
| Date: May              11, 2007 | By:                                                                                          | /s/ MARK              J.              ROSENBLUM |
|                                 | Mark                J. Rosenblum                                                                  |
|                                 | Chief                Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting                Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: May 13, 2011 /s/Cosmo Palmieri     Chief Executive Officer
J.L.R. v. C.R.J., Jr.

2160844

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

Affirmed.
Order entered December 19 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 16 - 00806 - CR No. 05 - 16 - 00807 - CR No. 05 - 16 - 00808 - CR JALEN DEMARCUS FISHE R, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 12 - 34701 - T , F12 - 62676 - T & F15 - 76192 - T 

### O RDER We GRANT the State’s December 13, 2016 first amended motion to extend time and ORDER the brief rece ived on December 12, 2016 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD LEE CANADA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MACOMBER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00033-JST (PR)

ORDER OF TRANSFER

Plaintiff has filed a pro se request for a temporary restraining order complaining of 

conditions at California State Prison–Sacramento (“CSP-SAC”). CSP-SAC is located in 

Sacramento County within the venue of the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). 

No defendant is alleged to reside in, and none of the events or omissions giving rise to the action 

occurred in, the Northern District. Venue therefore is proper in the Eastern District, and not in this 

one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 

Accordingly, in the interests of justice and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this action is 

TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The 

Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer the case forthwith. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2017

______________________________________

JON S. TIGAR

United States District Judge

Case 3:17-cv-00033-JST Document 3 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 6, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00260

- CV

Spicewood Springs Road Tunnel Coalition, a Te xas Unincorporated Association;

Joe Wheeler; and Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc., Appellant s

v.

Lee Le ffingwell, Mayor; Mike Martinez; Randi Shad e; Sheryl Cole; Laura Morrison; Bill Spelman; and Chris Riley, Council M embers; Marc Ott, City Manager, in Their Official Capacities for the City of Austin; and the City of Austin, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 250TH D ISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, HE NSON AND GOODWIN

JUSTICE HENSON NOT P ARTICIPATING

REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considere d, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the trial court’s

judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. It is FUR THER ordered

that the appellee pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and

that this decision be certified below for observance.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRINITY COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 22nd

day of April, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JAMES SCOTT FRELS, Appellant

NO. 12-13-00241-CR; Trial Court No. 9953

Opinion by James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 8

th day of December, 2015.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 11 (Friday, January 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 5875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01212]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP25-350-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: REX 2025-01-10 Negotiated Rate 
Agreement to be effective 1/11/2025.
    Filed Date: 1/10/25.
    Accession Number: 20250110-5365.
    Comment Date: 5 pm ET 1/22/25.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or [email protected].

    Dated: January 13, 2025.
Carlos D. Clay,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01212 Filed 1-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Fact Sheet Farm Credit Administration

1501 Farm Credit Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102-5090

May 9, 2013 Contact: Michael Stokke or Christine Quinn,

703-883-4056

E-mail: info-line@fca.gov

Website: www.fca.gov

Fact Sheet on Final Rule Establishing Regulations on Use 

of Unincorporated Business Entities

The Farm Credit Administration Board approved a final rule to establish a regulatory 

framework for Farm Credit System (System) institutions’ use of unincorporated business entities

(UBEs), organized under state law, to carry out certain functions, services or activities of a 

System institution. 

FCA established the new rules within part 611—Organization, by creating new subpart 

J—Unincorporated Business Entities, and new sections 611.1150–611.1158. The FCA Board 

also approved conforming changes to existing regulatory sections. In adopting this final rule, 

FCA will accomplish the following:

1. Create a uniform approval and oversight process for FCA to consider requests by 

System institutions to organize or invest in UBEs for certain functions, services or 

business activities.

2. Affirm FCA’s authority to regulate and examine the System institutions’ use of UBEs, 

including FCA’s authority to impose any conditions deemed necessary and appropriate 

related to UBE business activity and to take enforcement action against System 

institutions whose business operations use UBEs.

3. Prohibit System institutions from using UBEs to engage in direct lending or any activity 

that exceeds their authority under the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended, (Act) or 

circumvents the application of cooperative principles. 

4. Limit the amount of a System institution’s aggregate equity investments in most UBEs 

to 1 percent of a System institution’s total loans outstanding at the time the investment 

is made. FCA may impose a lower percentage limit for an institution based on safety or 

soundness or other relevant concerns. FCA may also consider and approve a request 

to exceed the 1 percent limit. 

5. Establish standards for the proper and adequate disclosure and reporting of System 

UBE activity and ensure that the System’s use of UBEs remains transparent and free 

from conflicts of interest. 

-more-
2

6. Grandfather from the notice and approval provisions those UBE formations and equity 

investments that FCA specifically approved in writing prior to the effective date of the 

rule.

7. Rescind Bookletter BL─057, Use of State-Chartered Business Entities to Hold 

Acquired Property, when the final rule takes effect.

The final rule does not give System institutions any new powers or authorities. It 

recognizes institutions’ rights to exercise their existing incidental powers and investment 

authorities under the Act and allows them to continue to establish UBEs in accordance with the 

new regulatory process. 

The rule will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register during which 

either or both bodies of Congress are in session. We will publish a notice of the effective date in 

the Federal Register. 

###
EXHIBIT 99.8
                                                                    ------------


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby  consent to the use of our audit report dated March 6, 2007  relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (the "Company")
as at December  31, 2006 and 2005,  the  consolidated  statements  of earnings,
deficit  and cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended
December 31, 2006, the management's assessment on the effectiveness of internal
control  over  financial  reporting  and  the  effectiveness  of the  Company's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as of December 31, 2006 which is
incorporated  by reference in its (i) Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company
for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2006,  (ii)  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-103697),  (iii) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File
No.  333-14184)  and  (iv)  Registration  Statement  on  Form  F-10  (File  No.
333-123117) each filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Chartered Accountants


March 15, 2007
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
EXHIBIT 32



                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC (the "Fund") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.


                                           RIDGEWOOD ENERGY M FUND, LLC
Dated:       April 5, 2007
                                By:   /s/  ROBERT E. SWANSON
                                    Name:  Robert E. Swanson
                                   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:       April 5, 2007
                                By:   /s/  KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
                                    Name:  Kathleen P. McSherry
                                   Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                           Officer)



A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy M Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy M Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a
separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2710

PATSY DARNELL, as next friend and Guardian of

Cecil Curtis Hammonds,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DARRELL MCMURRAY, Sheriff Scott County

Sheriff's Department; ED JOHNSON, Virginia

State Police; M. A. SPIVEY, Virginia State

Police; JERRY BROADWATER, Sheriff of Scott

County in his official capacity only,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JAMES P. BLEDSOE; UNKNOWN MEMBERS VIRGINIA

STATE POLICE; UNKNOWN MEMBERS SCOTT COUNTY

SHERIFF,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-91-61-B)

Argued: May 6, 1996 Decided: June 13, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Thomas Lee Rasnic, RASNIC & RASNIC, Jonesville, Virginia,

for Appellant. Peter Robert Messitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: James S.

Gilmore, III, Attorney General of Virginia, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL, Richmond, Virginia; Beth Osborne Skinner, WOODWARD, MILES

& FLANNAGAN, P.C., Bristol, Virginia; Henry Keuling-Stout, KEULINGSTOUT & BRADSHAW, Big Stone Gap, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* A psychiatrist who examined Hammonds immediately following

his detention testified that he believed Hammonds suffered from

either acute schizophrenia or a manic-depressive disorder.

3

PER CURIAM:

In November 1989, Virginia law enforcement officials were

notified that Cecil Curtis Hammonds, who was known to suffer from

some type of mental impairment,* had threatened a family member's

life with a shotgun. After obtaining a Civil Mental Temporary

Detention Order from a Virginia Special Justice, the officials went

to Hammonds's residence in order to detain him. When the officials

arrived, Hammonds appeared on his porch, shotgun in hand, then disappeared into his home and refused repeated requests to surrender.

Several hours later, after Hammonds had continued to refuse to

emerge from his home, the officers began to use tear gas in an

effort to force Hammonds to exit. Hammonds responded by firing his

shotgun at the officers. Only after an officer had suffered a

gunshot wound in his neck and shoulder and after a fire had erupted

in Hammonds's home as a result of the use of flammable tear gas,

did Hammonds surrender.

Appellant Patsy Darnell, acting as Hammonds's next friend and

guardian, filed a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States

District Court for the Western District of Virginia against several

of the officials, contending that Hammonds's rights under the

Fourth Amendment and Virginia law had been violated. A motion for

summary judgment followed and was granted in the defendants' favor.
4

We have thoroughly reviewed the opinion of the district court and

are satisfied that the grant of summary judgment was proper.

Accordingly, the judgment is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we,
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Manitex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                                            
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:                      |  | /s/ David J. Langevin                                                      
|Name:                    |  | David J. Langevin                                                          
|Title:                   |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                       
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)               
|                        
|Dated: November 13, 2008
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ David H. Gransee                                                       
|Name:                    |  | David H. Gransee                                                           
|Title:                   |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                 
|                         |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)
|                        
|Dated: November 13, 2008