alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 196 

Designating May 5, 2021, as the ‘‘National Day of Awareness for Missing 

and Murdered Native Women and Girls’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2021 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. SCHATZ, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and Mr. CRAPO) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 5, 2021, as the ‘‘National Day of Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native Women and 

Girls’’. 

Whereas, according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some Tribal communities, American 

Indian women face murder rates that are more than 10 

times the national average murder rate; 

Whereas, according to the most recently available data from 

the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2017, 

homicide was the sixth leading cause of death for American Indian and Alaska Native females between 1 and 44 

years of age; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 196 ATS 

Whereas little data exist on the number of missing American 

Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian women in 

the United States; 

Whereas, on July 5, 2013, Hanna Harris, a member of the 

Northern Cheyenne Tribe, was reported missing by her 

family in Lame Deer, Montana; 

Whereas the body of Hanna Harris was found 5 days after 

she went missing; 

Whereas Hanna Harris was determined to have been raped 

and murdered, and the individuals accused of committing 

those crimes were convicted; 

Whereas the case of Hanna Harris is an example of many 

similar cases; and 

Whereas Hanna Harris was born on May 5, 1992: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 5, 2021, as the ‘‘National 

3 Day of Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native 

4 Women and Girls’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups— 

7 (A) to commemorate the lives of missing 

8 and murdered American Indian, Alaska Native, 

9 and Native Hawaiian women whose cases are 

10 documented and undocumented in public 

11 records and the media; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 196 ATS 

1 (B) to demonstrate solidarity with the fam2 ilies of victims in light of those tragedies. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

GARY ROBINSON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 45 WM 2016 

 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2016, the Petition for King’s Bench and/or 

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
CALLAGY LAW

Michael J. Smikun, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice Application Pending)

650 From Road, Suite 565

Paramus, NJ 07652

Telephone: (201) 261-1700

Facsimile: (201) 549-8408

E-mail: msmikun@callagylaw.com

PUTTERMAN YU LLP

Constance J. Yu, Esq. (SBN 182704)

345 California Street, Suite 1160

San Francisco, CA 94104-2626

Telephone: (415) 839-8779

Facsimile: (415) 737-1363 

E-mail: cyu@plylaw.com

Attorneys from Plaintiffs Parkridge Limited and Mabel Mak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

On Behalf of PARKRIDGE LIMITED, a 

Hong Kong corporation, by Mabel Mak, and 

MABEL MAK, an individual, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

INDYZEN, INC., a California corporation, 

and PRAVEEN NARRA KUMAR, an 

individual; 

Defendants.

No. 4:16-cv-07387-JSW

APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY FOR 

ADMISSION TO PRACTICE PRO HAC 

VICE PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 

RULE 11-3

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 80 Filed 11/14/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 80 Filed 11/14/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW Document 80 Filed 11/14/19 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 57 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1139
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 57 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 7 PageID 1140
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 57 Filed 12/07/05 Page 3 of 7 PageID 1141
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 57 Filed 12/07/05 Page 4 of 7 PageID 1142
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 57 Filed 12/07/05 Page 5 of 7 PageID 1143
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 57 Filed 12/07/05 Page 6 of 7 PageID 1144
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 57 Filed 12/07/05 Page 7 of 7 PageID 1145
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Optionable,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2006,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 25, 2006                              /s/ Kevin Cassidy
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Kevin Cassidy
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


  [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Optionable, Inc. and will be reatined by Optionable, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]


















                                       30
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

RHASHEA LYNN HARMON,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2695 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 72 DB 2019

Attorney Registration No. 312859

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13 th day of July , 2020, upon consideration of the Report and

Recommendations of the Discipli nary Board, Rhashea Lynn Harmon is disbarred from

the practice of law in this Commonwealth . Respondent shall comply with all the provisions

of Pa.R.D .E. 217 and shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board

. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
BLACK POINT ASSETS, INC., AS TRUSTEE OF the 5224 58TH TERRACE EAST LAND TRUST DATED OCTOBER 5, 2012, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1063

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019

Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, LLC, Tampa (withdrew after briefing), and Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, PLLC, Tampa (withdrew after briefing), for Appellant.

Robert R. Edwards of Choice Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Smartmetric, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December
31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay Needelman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Dated:
      February 22, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Jay
      NeedelmanJay
      Needelman (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Chief
      Financial Officer
#### Curtis E. CRAWFORD, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joseph M. BROOKS, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America, Party in Interest.

No. 04-6312.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 29, 2004.

Decided May 6, 2004.

Curtis E. Crawford, Appellant pro se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Curtis E. Crawford seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying various motions in Crawford’s pending action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Crawford seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Crawford’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

Report of Independent Public Accountants on Financial Statement Schedule

To ChoicePoint Inc.:

We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, the consolidated financial statements included in ChoicePoint
Inc.'s annual report to shareholders incorporated by reference in this Form
10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated February 15, 2002. We did not
audit the 1999 consolidated financial statements of DBT Online, Inc. and
subsidiaries, a company acquired during 2000 in a transaction accounted for as a
pooling of interests as discussed in Note 2. Such statements are included in the
consolidated financial statements of ChoicePoint Inc. and reflect total revenue
of 15% of the related consolidated totals for the year ended December 31, 1999.
These statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished
to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for DBT
Online, Inc. and subsidiaries is based solely on the report of the other
auditors. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those
statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index is the
responsibility of the company's management and is presented for purposes of
complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not part of
the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our
opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to
be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.



/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 15, 2002


                                       27
Willard BRYANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-114

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019 Rehearing Denied March 25, 2019

Willard Bryant, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Franklin v. State*, 258 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 2018).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis G. Dracup, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of Language Line Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                         |  |                                     
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: September 19, 2006
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ Dennis G. Dracup                
|                         |  | Dennis G. Dracup                    
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-73035) pertaining to the P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. 1996
Employee Stock Option Plan, 1997 Restaurant Management Stock Option Plan, 1998
Stock Option Plan and 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of P.F. Chang's China
Bistro, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 2, 2000.



Phoenix, Arizona                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 1, 2000
Exhibit 23.1 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Partners 

CarrAmerica Realty, L.P.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-53751and 333-114049) on Form S-3 of CarrAmerica Realty, L.P. of our report dated February 22, 2005, except as to note 3, which is as of March 1, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CarrAmerica Realty, L.P. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 and all related financial statement schedules, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of CarrAmerica Realty, L.P. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Washington, DC 

March 7, 2005
L

o

c

k

e

L

o

r

d

L

L

P

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San

Francisco, C

A 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC.

Saji v. Residential Credit Solutions, et al., Case No. 4:17-cv-00025-YGR

LOCKE LORD LLP

Regina J. McClendon (SBN 184669)

rmcclendon@lockelord.com

Meagan S. Tom (SBN 273489)

meagan.tom@lockelord.com

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 318-8810

Fax: (415) 676-5816

Attorneys for Defendants

Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.; The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as

Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-13T1 Mortgage

Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-13T1; and Ditech Financial LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAISY SAJI, an individual,

Plaintiff,

vs.

RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, a business

entity; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, a

business entity; DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, a

business entity; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 4:17-cv-00025-YGR

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE AS TO

RESIDENTIAL CREDIT

SOLUTIONS, INC.

[FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)]

Complaint Filed: December 2, 2016

Plaintiff Daisy Saji (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. (“RCS”)

(collectively with Plaintiff, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows:

1. This action, and each and every claim asserted in the action, shall be dismissed with

prejudice as to RCS only; and

2. Each of the Parties shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
L

o

c

k

e

L

o

r

d

L

L

P

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San

Francisco, C

A 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC.

Saji v. Residential Credit Solutions, et al., Case No. 4:17-cv-00025-YGR

Dated: July 31, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

LOCKE LORD LLP

By: /s/ Meagan S. Tom

Regina J. McClendon

Meagan S. Tom

Attorneys for Defendants Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.;

The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as

Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWALT, Inc.,

Alternative Loan Trust 2006-13T1 Mortgage Pass-Through

Certificates, Series 2006-13T1; and Ditech Financial LLC

Dated: July 31, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

MELLEN LAW FIRM

By: /s/ Sarah Shapero

Matthew Mellen

Sarah Shapero

Attorneys for Plaintiff Daisy Saji

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), the filing attorney attests that she has obtained

concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the indicated signatories to the document.

Dated: August 25, 2017 By: /s/ Meagan S. Tom

Meagan S. Tom
Exhibit 23.2(a)




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated February 18, 2000
relating to the December 31, 1999 consolidated financial statements of Jones
Intercable, Inc., which report is included as an exhibit in the Comcast Cable
Communications, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. It should
be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of Jones Intercable,
Inc. subsequent to December 31, 1999 or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP



Denver, Colorado,
   March 28, 2002.
Gregory DECKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 29, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.4
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the
audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




---



##### 



(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial
reporting.
 st
 (signed John W. Weaver)John W. WeaverPresident & Chief Executive OfficerAbitibi-Consolidated Inc.
Johnny Edward ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2007

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.