alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7278

MICHAEL SEWELL SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUFUS R. FLEMING, Warden; CAPTAIN BENNETT;

CAPTAIN WHITLOW; M. HICKS; G. WADE; M. L.

HILL; SERGEANT WHITEHEAD; SERGEANT FERGUSON;

SERGEANT MOORE; C/O GOIN; C/O HUDSON; VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-843-2)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Sewell Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion granting summary judgment and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Smith v. Fleming, No. CA-95-843-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 2:05-cv-00122-J-BB Document 6 Filed 11/29/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 26
 

 Case 2:05-cv-00122-J-BB Document 6 Filed 11/29/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 27
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 37 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by Centers for Disease 
 Control and Prevention relating to ``Requirement for Persons To Wear 
        Masks While on Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
relating to ``Requirement for Persons To Wear Masks While on 
Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs'' (86 Fed. Reg. 8025 (February 
3, 2021); determined through a letter of opinion from the Government 
Accountability Office dated December 14, 2021, and printed in the 
Congressional Record on December 15, 2021, on pages S9206-S9208, that 
the order is a rule under the Congressional Review Act), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate March 15, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by Centers for Disease 
 Control and Prevention relating to ``Requirement for Persons To Wear 
        Masks While on Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs''.
```
EXHIBIT 31.2
  RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   I, Joseph R. Corrato, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Prudential Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania (the "Registrant"); and
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 Date:
July 1, 2011
/s/Joseph R. CorratoJoseph R. CorratoExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Order – Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE §

COMMISSION, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § 

§

MEGAFUND CORPORATION, STANLEY §

A. LEITNER, SARDKAUER HOLDINGS, §

IBC., BRADLEY C. STARK, CIG, LTD., § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1328-L

and JAMES A. RUMPF, Individually and §

d/b/a CILAK INTERNATIONAL, §

§

Defendants, §

§

and §

§

PAMELA C. STARK, §

§

Relief Defendant. §

ORDER

This is a civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for

alleged violations of the federal securities laws. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the

court in implementation thereof, on February 27, 2006, this action was referred to United States

Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan for pretrial management. On September 20, 2006, the Findings and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge were filed, recommending that the court

grant the Receiver’s Motion to Allow “A” Claims against the Megafund Receivership Estate [Doc.

#191], to which no objections were filed. 

Having reviewed the pleadings, file and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions

of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct. The

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 217 Filed 10/11/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1798
Order – Page 2

magistrate judge’s findings are accepted as those of the court. Accordingly, the court grants

Receiver’s Motion to Allow “A” Claims against the Megafund Receivership Estate [Doc. #191]. 

It is so ordered this 11th day of October, 2006.

_________________________________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01328-L Document 217 Filed 10/11/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1799
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Desmond Ross, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Ventures (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                              



| | By:    |                                  
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        | /s/ Desmond Ross                 
| | Name:  | Desmond Ross                     
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | September 17, 2007               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 21 PageID 1
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 21 PageID 2
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 3 of 21 PageID 3
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 4 of 21 PageID 4
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 5 of 21 PageID 5
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 6 of 21 PageID 6
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 7 of 21 PageID 7
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 8 of 21 PageID 8
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 9 of 21 PageID 9
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 10 of 21 PageID 10
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 11 of 21 PageID 11
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 12 of 21 PageID 12
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 13 of 21 PageID 13
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 14 of 21 PageID 14
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 15 of 21 PageID 15
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 16 of 21 PageID 16
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 17 of 21 PageID 17
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 18 of 21 PageID 18
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 19 of 21 PageID 19
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 20 of 21 PageID 20
Case 3:06-cv-00427-P Document 1 Filed 03/09/06 Page 21 of 21 PageID 21
Case 3:05-cv-01783-M-BF Document 67 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 686
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01783-M-BF Document 67 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 687
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
    


 
 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
  VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.
  FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
  EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN    
    


Effective
January 1, 2003 


Section 3.02
of the Veeco Instruments Inc. First Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan"), is hereby amended to read, in its entirety, as follows: 



        3.02    Number of Shares Subject to Plan



(a) The
total number of shares of Stock available for Offerings under the Plan shall be 750,000 shares, subject to adjustment as set forth in paragraph (b) below. Such Stock may be
authorized and unissued shares, treasury shares, or shares previously issued and reacquired by the Company. Any shares for which an Offering to purchase expires or is terminated or canceled may again
be made subject to Offerings under the Plan. 




*    *    *    *    * 


This
Amendment was approved by Veeco's Board of Directors on October 24, 2002, and by its stockholders on May 9, 2003. 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC. FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
EXHIBIT 7 

EXCERPTS OF 

MARK G. GRAFF 

DEPOSITION 

Placeholder – document filed 

under seal
O AO 120 (Rev. 2/99) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court Northern District California on the G Patents or U Trademarks:

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

CV 16-07403 JCS 12/30/2016 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco CA 94102

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

LIFE ON AIR, INC. CHATHOUSE INC.

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1 ***see attach Complaint***

 2

 3 .

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3 .

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

SUSAN Y. SOONG GINA AGUSTINE January 4, 2017

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Commissioner

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 4—Case file copy
EX PARTE T.N-H.

(In re: The matter of M.H., a minor child)

2170293

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 9, 2018

Mand. pet. denied.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1414

___________ Japhus L. Dooley, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Boyoni, Ms., Disciplinary Hearing * Eastern District of Arkansas. Officer; Marvin Evans, Warden, East * Arkansas Regional Unit; Robert Clark, * [UNPUBLISHED] Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, * Pine Bluff Central Office, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 5, 2000 Filed:

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the

EasternDistrict of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable JohnF. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Japhus Dooley appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After a careful review of the record, we conclude the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint. We deny Dooley’s pending motion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of SFSB, Inc. (the
“Company”) each certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge, that the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





/s/
                Philip E. LoganPhilip
                E. LoganPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
                14, 2008/s/
                Sophie T. WittelsbergerSophie
                Torin WittelsbergerVice-President
                and Chief Financial OfficerAugust
                14,2008





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document,
      and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason
      other
      than as specifically required by law.
Patrick Hugh SHAFFER v. Brian Ralph BEASLEY

2160717

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Affirmed.
Mark MCKENZIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-1095

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 10 (Thursday, January 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 4809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00903]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 16, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 7, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 1260 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1079, K2025-1078.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-00903 Filed 1-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICARDO B. LEIVA

- GARAY , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1 670

[ December 22, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Charles A. Schwab and Robert E. Belanger , Judge s ; L.T. Case No

. 56 201 4 CF00 1070 A.

Ricardo B. Leiva

- Garay

, Bonifay

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

M AY , D AMOORGIAN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal,
      President, Chief Executive Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of
      Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.








*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Executive Officer




October
      12, 2006






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal, Chief
      Financial Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.








*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Financial Officer




October
      12, 2006
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 39 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Health and 

Human Services relating to ‘‘Vaccine and Mask Requirements To Mitigate the Spread of COVID–19 in Head Start Programs’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2022 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. DAINES, Mr. HOEVEN, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. LEE, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. MORAN, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. WICKER, 

and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following joint resolution; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Health and Human Services relating 

to ‘‘Vaccine and Mask Requirements To Mitigate the 

Spread of COVID–19 in Head Start Programs’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘Vac5 cine and Mask Requirements To Mitigate the Spread of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 39 IS 

1 COVID–19 in Head Start Programs’’ (86 Fed. Reg. 

2 68052 (November 30, 2021)), and such rule shall have 

3 no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Emmanuel CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1563

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 25, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

VS. ) CASE NO. 3:05-CR-240-P(01)

 )

RAKESH JYOTI SARAN )

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a 

Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning

Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed

within ten days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District

Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning

the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court

accepts the plea of guilty and Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty. Sentence will be imposed in

accordance with the Court’s scheduling order.

SIGNED this 30 day of November 2006. th

_________________________________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cr-00240-K Document 405 Filed 11/30/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 1327
John OSBORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-4735

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 2019

John Osborn, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.