alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 17-cv-00179-HSG

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LINDA ZHONG'S APPLICATION TO 

APPEAR AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GENERAL CAPACITOR, 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

a Florida corporation, GENERAL 

CAPACITOR, LLC, 

and GENERAL CAPACITOR CO. 

LTD.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LINDA ZHONG,

Defendant.

CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-00179-HSG

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 

LINDA ZHONG'S APPLICATION TO 

APPEAR AT CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE

Case 4:17-cv-00179-HSG Document 44 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 2
2 17-cv-00179-HSG

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LINDA ZHONG'S APPLICATION TO

APPEAR AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant LINDA ZHONG applies for an order allowing her counsel to appear by 

telephone at the Case Management Conference on February 28, 2017 at 2:00pm. 

Whereas the Court finds that there is good cause to allow Defendant's counsel to appear 

by telephone, NOW THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant LINDA ZHONG's counsel may 

appear by telephone at the Case Management Conference on February 28, 2017 at 

2:00pm. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for 

the telephonic appearance. 

DATED: February 21, 2017 By: __________________________

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Case 4:17-cv-00179-HSG Document 44 Filed 02/21/17 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1****Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Novelis Inc. (the Company),hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.              /s/ Martha Finn Brooks   Martha Finn Brooks   President and Chief Operating Officer
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

William Thomas Hoover, Smyrna, Georgia, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1728 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's affidavit with exhibits sworn to October 26, 2019, and upon reading the responsive correspondence by the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department dated November 21, 2019, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stonner], 175 AD3d 799 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Dorsett], 174 AD3d 1219 [2019]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Health Holding, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Julianna Lu, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

August 15, 2005                        /s/ Julianna Lu
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Julianna Lu
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10(g): PAYCHEX, INC. OFFICER PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR THE YEAR
ENDED MAY 31, 2004

On July 10, 2003, the Board of Directors (the "Board") approved the Compensation
Committee's recommendation to adopt the Paychex, Inc. Officer Performance
Incentive Program (the "Program") for the year ended May 31, 2004, as outlined
below:

1.   Participants: Executive officers of Paychex, Inc.

2.   Maximum Incentive: 50% of base salary for fiscal year 2004 as approved by
     the Board of Directors at the July 2003 Board meeting.

3.   Performance Criteria: The payment of cash bonus awards to participants
     shall be determined by the Board on a discretionary basis based primarily
     on how year-over-year revenue growth, year-over-year operating income
     growth, and improvement in operating income as a percentage of revenues for
     the fiscal year compare to the goals that are established annually by the
     Board of Directors.

4.   Payment: Incentive payments to be paid in July 2004, after Board approval.
     Officer must be employed at the fiscal year end to be eligible for any
     bonus.

5.   Changes and Terminations: Bonus awards, changes to and termination of the
     Program are at the sole discretion of the Board.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

LEJONATHAN E. COX, §

Petitioner, §

§

v. § Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-0123-B (BH)

§

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, §

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

Respondent §

 

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and

Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and

Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 9 day of July , 2008.

th

_________________________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Isiah GRIFFIN, Appellee.

No. 3D14-2460

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed March 13, 2019

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Rasco Klock Perez & Nieto, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr. and Hilton Napoleon, II, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SALTER1 , LOGUE2 and SCALES, JJ.

1

Did not participate in oral argument.

2

Did not participate in oral argument.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Born-Suniaga v. State*, 256 So.3d 783, 786 (Fla. 2018) (holding that the State is not entitled to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)'s recapture period when the State terminates prosecution and files new charges based on the same conduct before speedy trial period expires, but fails to notify the defendant of new charges until after expiration of speedy trial period).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT FINBAR BROWN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

PEACEHEALTH ST JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 35763

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 00626

- JCC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Robert Finbar Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s judgme nt

dismissing as time

- barred his action alleging federal and state law claims arising

out of his wife’s death. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 35763

on the basis of the applicable statute s of limitations

. Ventura Mobilehome Cmtys.

Owners Ass ’n v. City of San Buenaventura , 371 F.3d 1046, 1050 (9th Cir. 2004).

We affirm.

The district court properly dismi ssed Brown’s action as barred by the

applicable statutes of limitation s

. See Wash

. Rev. Code § 4

. 16

. 350 (3) (statute of

limitations for injuries resulting from health care is three years from act or

omission or one year from the date of actual knowledge of an act of fraud or

concealment) ; Bagley v. CMC Real Estate Corp.

, 923 F.2d 758, 760 (9th Cir.

1991) (statute of limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim s in Washington state is

three years from the date on which the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the

injury that is the basis of the claims )

.

The district court did not err by implicitly denying Brown’s partial motion

for summary judgment because it was moot.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Brown’s request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 44) is denied

.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Pan Pacific RetailProperties, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-72551, 333-37564, 333-64736, 333-103498, and 333-106250 each on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-61169, 333-51384, and 333-105585 each on Form S-8 of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. of our reportsdated February 21, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financial statement Schedule III, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

February 21, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH DIVISION

BARON ELDER, §

Petitioner, §

 § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:06-CV-025-Y

 §

COLE JETER, Warden, §

FCI-Fort Worth, §

Respondent. § 

 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Before the Court is the petition for writ of habeas corpus

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 of petitioner Baron Elder, along with the

June 9, 2006, findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the

United States magistrate judge. The magistrate judge gave the

parties until June 30 to file written objections to the findings,

conclusions, and recommendation. As of the date of this order, no

written objections have been filed. 

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this

case, and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendation of the United States magistrate

judge filed on June 30, 2006. The Court concludes that the petition

for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed for the reasons

stated in the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions.

 Therefore, the findings, conclusions and recommendation of

the magistrate judge are ADOPTED.

Respondent Jeter’s May 3, 2006, motion to dismiss [docket no.

6] is GRANTED.

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00025-Y Document 8 Filed 07/11/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 40
2

 Baron Elder’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

SIGNED July 11, 2006.

 

 Case 4:06-cv-00025-Y Document 8 Filed 07/11/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 41
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 12

- 13377 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12

- cv - 20651

- FAM
SANTANA POUZA, a.k.a . Santana Pouzo, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus USCIS MIAMI, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U

. S

. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants

- Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________ ________________ (April 1, 2013) Before WILSON , PRYOR and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-13377 Date Filed: 04/01/2013 Page: 1 of 22 Santana Pouz a , a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, appeals the dismissal of her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fed. R. Civ. P 12(b)(1). Pou za sought an order directing the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to grant her parole into the United States . We affirm. The district court correctly dismissed Pouza ’s complaint. The decision whether to parole an alien into the United States rests within the discretion of the Secretary , 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5)(A); 8 C.F.R. § 212.5(a) , and t hat discretionary decision is shielded from judicial review, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B) . The distric t
court lacked authority to consider Pouz a ’s complaint under the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, because the Secretary did not owe Pouza a “clear nondiscretionary duty.” Lifestar Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. United States , 365 F.3d 1293, 1295 (11th Cir. 2004)

. And the distri ct court could not review Pouza ’s complaint under either the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706, or the Declar atory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 , because neither serve s as an independent basis for subject

matter jurisdiction. See Choctaw Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States , 761 F.2d 609, 615 (11th Cir. 1985) (addressing the A dministrative Act ); Borden v. Katzman , 881 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1989) (addressing the D eclaratory J udgment A ct ).
We AFFIRM the dismissal of Pouza ’s complaint. Case: 12-13377 Date Filed: 04/01/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of BankFinancial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F.
Morgan Gasior, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/   F. Morgan Gasior
-----------------------------------------------------
F. Morgan Gasior
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and President (Principal Executive Officer)









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BankFinancial Corporation and will be retained by BankFinancial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
      906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Daniel
      C. Montano, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
      in
      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.


Date:
                June 5, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              Daniel C. Montano**Name:
                Daniel C. Montano****Title:
                Co-President and Chief Executive
                Officer**










I,
      Mickael A. Flaa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of CardioVascular BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
      in
      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.


Date:
                June 5, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              Mickael A. Flaa**Name:
                Mickael A. Flaa****Title:
                Chief Financial Officer and
                Treasurer**





*Signed
      originals of these written statements required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.*





*These
      certifications accompany the Form 10-Q to which they relate, are not deemed
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated
      by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933
      or
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date
      of
      this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
      in
      such filing.*
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  The
        following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
        and Chief Financial Officer of Royal Financial, Inc. on the basis of such
        officers’ knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.
  **CERTIFICATION**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2007 (the “Report”), the
        undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
                      February 14, 2007
                    By:
                    /s/Donald
                      A. Moll
 Name:  Donald
                      A. MollTitle:    President
                      and Chief Executive Officer
 Date:
                            February 14, 2007
                        By:
                        /s/Leonard
                          Szwajkowski
  Name: 
                          Leonard SzwajkowskiTitle:   
                          Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
                          Treasurer
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies
        the Report and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of this
        Report.
EX PARTE Johnny JOHNSON

1170121 (CR-16-0854)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 19 (Thursday, January 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02053]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meetings; Correction

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service published a document in the Federal 
Register of January 24, 2025, concerning the schedule and agenda for a 
Meeting of the Board of Governors. The document contained incorrect 
dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Elston, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 24, 2025, in FR Doc. 2025-01748, 
on page 8165, in the third column, correct the ``Matters to be 
Considered'' caption to read:

Matters To Be Considered

Meeting of the Board of Governors

Wednesday, February 5, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Matters.
    2. Financial and Operational Matters.
    3. Compensation and Personnel Matters.
    4. Administrative Items.

Thursday, February 6, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. (Open)

    1. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board of Governors.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.
    3. Approval of the Minutes.
    4. Committee Reports.
    5. Quarterly Financial Report.
    6. Quarterly Service Performance Report.
    7. Approval of Tentative Agenda for the May 8, 2025 Meeting.
    8. Adjournment

    Dated: January 28, 2025.
Michael J. Elston,
Secretary of the Board of Governors.
[FR Doc. 2025-02053 Filed 1-28-25; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
Case 3:85-cr-00140 Document 1 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 7 PageID 81
Case 3:85-cr-00140 Document 1 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 7 PageID 82
Case 3:85-cr-00140 Document 1 Filed 01/04/06 Page 3 of 7 PageID 83
Case 3:85-cr-00140 Document 1 Filed 01/04/06 Page 4 of 7 PageID 84
Case 3:85-cr-00140 Document 1 Filed 01/04/06 Page 5 of 7 PageID 85
Case 3:85-cr-00140 Document 1 Filed 01/04/06 Page 6 of 7 PageID 86
Case 3:85-cr-00140 Document 1 Filed 01/04/06 Page 7 of 7 PageID 87