alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sockeye
Seafood Group, Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sheldon Goldberg,
Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  May 14, 2005         /s/ Sheldon Goldberg
                              ------------------------------------
                            By: Sheldon Goldberg, Chief Executive
                                Officer of Sockeye Seafood Group, Inc.
Steve CROOKS and Era Lea Crooks v. State of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

NO. 2019-C-0160

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF RAPIDES

ORDER

Considering the petition of the applicants in the above entitled and numbered matter,

IT IS ORDERED that a writ of review issue and that briefing and argument are limited to Assignment of Error No. 3 : "The lower courts erred in failing to find that the Plaintiffs' inverse condemnation claims have prescribed under either or both La. R.S. 13:5111 or 28 U.S.C. § 2501."

WEIMER, J., would order a full grant and docket.

GENOVESE, J., recused.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

The undersigned Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee
Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Dated: February 13, 2006                                                                     |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/PETER C. BROWNPeter C. Brown
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President |  | 
|/s/CRAIG R. RAMSEYCraig R. Ramsey
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer       |  | 

[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Marquee Holdings Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---



QuickLinks
Case 3:05-cv-01711-P Document 36 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 5 PageID 193
Case 3:05-cv-01711-P Document 36 Filed 10/05/06 Page 2 of 5 PageID 194
Case 3:05-cv-01711-P Document 36 Filed 10/05/06 Page 3 of 5 PageID 195
Case 3:05-cv-01711-P Document 36 Filed 10/05/06 Page 4 of 5 PageID 196
Case 3:05-cv-01711-P Document 36 Filed 10/05/06 Page 5 of 5 PageID 197
Order entered April 28, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00132-CV

VOLLARA, LLC, ET AL., Appellants

V.

ENAGIC USA, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-00513

ORDER

We GRANT the April 22, 2014 motion of Renee Carroll, Official Court Reporter for the 

116th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the 

reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed on or before May 27, 2014.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdant Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Curd, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |     |                                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ DAVID J. CURD                            
| |     | David J. Curd
Interim Chief Financial Officer



November 17, 2008
Figure 1: Time Plot of Coefficients of Variation 

4 

0.23 0.20 

4 

0.17 

5 

4 

CV 

5 

0.14 

4 4 5 4 1 

5 4 5 

0.11 

5 4 

5 

4 4 5 5 3 4

5 5 2 3 2 

0.08 

2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 

3 1 3 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 

0.05 

3 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 

Source x Year 
Figure 2: Plot of Standard Errors vs. Mean Estimates 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 

1 

11 

1 

1 

1 

se(Y) 

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 

0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 

2

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

3 

3 

3

3

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

33

4 

4 4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

5 4

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

Y 
Figure 3: Time Plot of Point Estimates and 95% Confidence Bounds for R_{12} 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

R_{12} 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

-0.45 -0.30 -0.15 0.0 0.15 0.30 0.45 0.60 

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 

Year 
Figure 4: Time Plot of Point Estimates and 95% Confidence Bounds for R_{34} 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

E 

R_{34} 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

L 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

-0.50 -0.35 -0.20 -0.05 0.10 0.25 0.40 0.55 

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 

Year
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 44 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.44
                                    Agreed to September 21, 2022        

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY FOR PRESENTATION OF STATUE OF 
              HARRY S. TRUMAN FROM THE PEOPLE OF MISSOURI.

    The State of Missouri is authorized to use the rotunda of the 
Capitol on September 29, 2022, for a ceremony to present the statue of 
Harry S. Truman from the people of Missouri for placement in the 
rotunda of the Capitol. Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
CERTIFICATIONS I, Desmond Ross , the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of  , Quantum Solar Power Corp..(the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;  (2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  (3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  (4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have: a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and (5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date:November 14, 2008/s/ Desmond RossBy:Desmond RossTitle:Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
# C_2018042EN.01000302.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Dunajská Streda (Slovakia) lodged on 8 November 2017 — ZSE Energia, a.s. v RG

(Case C-627/17)

(2018/C 042/06)

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Referring court

Okresný súd Dunajská Streda

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ZSE Energia, a.s.

Applicant:

Defendant: RG

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the term ‘one of the parties’ used in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 (1) establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (‘Regulation No 861/2007’) be interpreted as also including the ‘intervener’, that is, an individual participating in the proceedings who is neither the claimant (applicant) nor the respondent (defendant), but who intervenes in the proceedings in order to support the arguments put forward by the claimant (applicant) or the respondent (defendant)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the term ‘one of the parties’ used in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 (1) establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (‘Regulation No 861/2007’) be interpreted as also including the ‘intervener’, that is, an individual participating in the proceedings who is neither the claimant (applicant) nor the respondent (defendant), but who intervenes in the proceedings in order to support the arguments put forward by the claimant (applicant) or the respondent (defendant)?

1

| 2. | In the event that the ‘intervener’ is not to be regarded as a ‘party’ for the purposes of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 861/2007:
  Does a procedure commenced using Form A of [Annex I] to Regulation No 861/2007 between a claimant (applicant) and a respondent (defendant) fall within the scope of Regulation No 861/2007 under Article 2(1) of that regulation, read in conjunction with Article 3(1) thereof, if those parties are domiciled in the same Member State as the Member State in which the court or tribunal seised is situated, and only the ‘intervener’ is domiciled in a different Member State? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that the ‘intervener’ is not to be regarded as a ‘party’ for the purposes of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 861/2007:

Does a procedure commenced using Form A of [Annex I] to Regulation No 861/2007 between a claimant (applicant) and a respondent (defendant) fall within the scope of Regulation No 861/2007 under Article 2(1) of that regulation, read in conjunction with Article 3(1) thereof, if those parties are domiciled in the same Member State as the Member State in which the court or tribunal seised is situated, and only the ‘intervener’ is domiciled in a different Member State?

---

(1)  OJ 2007 L 199, p. 1.

1

---
John W. SAATIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-0563

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 30, 2019

John W. Saatio, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Roberts, Ray, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Case 4:06-cv-00015-A Document 24 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 81
 

 Case 4:06-cv-00015-A Document 24 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 82
 

 Case 4:06-cv-00015-A Document 24 Filed 03/15/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 83
Leticia Michelle ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-3252

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Christy L. Shaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                         
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2005 |  | /s/    CHRISTY L.
SHAFFER                                               
|                     |  | Christy L. Shaffer Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Michael Frank Connor, certify that:

          1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all
reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in
respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc., on behalf of Public STEERS(R) Series TRV-C1
Trust;

          2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

          4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

          5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
the compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similar
standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling
or servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and
its officers and agents.


           Date: March 30, 2004             /s/ Michael Frank Connor
                                            ------------------------
                                            Michael Frank Connor
                                            President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Michael Coombs, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive
Officer, and CFO (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of Valley High
Mining Company (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including any consolidated subsidiary,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this Quarterly Report, the Registrant's conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls.



Dated: December 2, 2005                 /s/ John Michael Coombs
                                      -------------------------------
                                      John Michael Coombs,
                                      CEO, President, CFO, and
                                      Chairman of the Board
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 03-4509



# 

W ILLIAM J. T UCK ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge.

(CR-02-469)

Submitted: December 11, 2003

Decided: December 23, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL

Frank W. Dunham, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Robert Wagner,Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Olivia N. Hawkins, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION

PER CURIAM:William J. Tuck appeals from his conviction following his conditional guilty plea for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). He was sentenced to thirtyseven months in prison. On appeal, Tuck challenges: (1) the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress several firearms recovered from his vehicle; and (2) the district court’s denial of a reduction in his sentence under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1 (2002). We affirm. Factual findings underlying a motion to suppress are reviewed for clear error and legal determinations are reviewed de novo. Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 691 (1996); United States v. Rusher , 966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir. 1992). When a suppression motion has been denied, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government. United States v. Seidman , 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1998). Guided by these standards, we find no error in the district court’s determination that the police officers did not infringe Tuck’s Fourth Amendment rights. Section 2K2.1(b)(2) of the Guidelines provides for a reduction in sentence when the firearms in question are possessed by a disqualified person "solely for lawful sporting purposes or collection." Defendant bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to a specified sentencing reduction, and we review the court’s determination for clear error. See United States v. Abdi , 342 F.3d 313, 317 (4th Cir. 2003). We conclude the district court did not err in denying a § 2K2.1(b)(2) reduction in sentence.For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Tuck’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. T UCK
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DENESHYA AUGUSTA POOLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 339 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
C.G. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160830

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

Affirmed.