alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
"Matters of custody and support of minor children rest in the

[district court's] sound discretion," Wallace v. Wallace, 112 Nev. 1015, 1019, 922 P.2d 541, 543 (1996); thus, this Court reviews a district court's decision regarding child support for an abuse of discretion. Rivero v. Rivero, 125 Nev. 410, 438, 216 P.3d 213, 232 (2009). A district court abuses its discretion when it acts in "clear disregard of the guiding legal principles." Bergmann v. Boyce, 109 Nev. 670, 674, 856 P.2d 560, 563 (1993). NRS 125B.070 provides a statutory formula for determining a child support obligation. This court has determined a district court abuses its discretion regarding child support awards or modifications when the district court does not make specific findings of fact regarding any deviation from the NRS 125B.070 statutory support formula. Rivero, 125 Nev. at 438, 216 P.3d at 232 (citing Jackson v. Jackson, 111 Nev. 1551, 1553, 907 P.2d 990, 992 (1995)); see also NRS 125B.080(6); NRS 125B.145.

Here, the district court abused its discretion because it did not make specific findings of fact to support modifying Collinsworth's child support obligation. Based on the statutory formula (18 percent of his gross monthly income to support a child), Collinsworth was required to pay $535 per month in child support. NRS 125B.070(1)(a)-(b)(1). The district court issued an order reducing Collinsworth's monthly payments to $100, but did not make specific factual findings to support the deviation from the statutory formula. Accordingly, we

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2

### ORDER the judgment of the district court VACATED AND

REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

------ , 

## : ccetIM

, 

### Douglas

Gibbons

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Kenneth E. Pollock, District Judge Pecos Law Group Joseph W. Houston, II Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 

### 3
Vladislav YAMPOLSKY, Appellant, v. ALTIER JEWELERS, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Cutler Altier, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2302

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 4, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Judith A. FRANKEL, Appellant, v. HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE CORP., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-624

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019.

Elliot L. Miller, for appellant.

Peterson, Baldor & Maranges, PLLC, and Matthew Maranges and Ceasar X. Delgado, for appellee Carlos H. Martinez, as Trustee of the Humberto N. Martinez Family Trust.

Before SALTER and LINDSEY, JJ., and LEBAN, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2007



/s/ Michael SchmidtMichael SchmidtChief Financial Officer and Secretary


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

BRENDA G. CROUSE, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 7:05-CV-0113-R

) ECF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, )

Defendant. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in

this case (doc. 22). Plaintiff filed objections (doc. 25), and the District Court has made a de novo

review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was

made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED this 4th day of October, 2007.

_________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40622 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ROBERTO ESPARZA

- GARCIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 20

- 1

Before REAVLEY , CLEMENT, and H O, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto Esparza

Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Esparza

- Garcia h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 20 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40622 Document: 00514354521 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018No. 17

- 40622

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to w ithdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40622 Document: 00514354521 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 6, 2014

No. 04-14-00036-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.E.,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-PA-00043

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal. The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late clerk’s 

record, stating that the notice of appeal was filed but was not routed to the clerk to prepare the 

record. The notification states that the record will be completed by February 14, 2014. Because 

this is an accelerated appeal, we ORDER the trial court clerk to file the clerk’s record on or 

before February 10, 2014. NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Leon W. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2234

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Navidec  Financial  Services,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending  September 30, 2006
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report") I, Robert D. Grizzle,  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 9, 2007



/s/Robert D. Grizzle
------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert D. Grizzle, Chief Operating Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1309
NICK DRAGOVICH, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH M. BUICE, a/k/a ModChipUSA, a/k/a A&M Enterprises; ANDRE WALLIMAN, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-418) Submitted: November 14, 2002 Decided: November 15, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph M. Buice, Andre Walliman, Appellants Pro Se. Douglas Wayne Kenyon, Keri C. Prince, Laurie J. Bremer, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph M. Buice and Andre Walliman appeal the district court’s order entering default judgment against them in this copyright infringement and breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeDragovich v. Buice , No. CA-00-418 (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2000). Additionally, we deny the Appellants’ motions for a stay of discovery in Dragovich’s collection proceeding in the Eastern District of Virginia and to expedite conside ration of the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.1



V. I. Technologies, Inc.

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of V. I.
Technologies, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, John R. Barr, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Thomas T. Higgins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each singly certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 26, 2003



| |  |                                      |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------ |  | 
|
| |  | /s/    John R. Barr                  |  | 
| |  | John R. Barr Chief Executive Officer |  |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

# SUMMARY:

Notice of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC), is hereby given in accordance with the provisions of the Bylaws of the FCSIC.

# DATES:

10 a.m., Wednesday, February 12, 2025.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may observe the open portions of this meeting in person at 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to virtually attend, at least 24 hours in advance, visit                        *FCSIC.gov*, select “News & Events,” then select “Board Meetings.” From there, access the linked “Instructions for board meeting visitors” and complete the described registration process.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

If you need more information or assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-4056.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public. The following matters will be considered:

## Portions Open to the Public

    - Approval of Minutes for December 11, 2024
    - Review and Setting of Insurance Premium Accrual Rates
    Policy Statement Concerning Contracting      ( print page 8716)    
    Portions Closed to the Public
    Report on Biennial Liquidity Assistance Exercise
Annual Report on Contracts
Annual Report on Whistleblower Activity

    
Ashley Waldron,

Secretary to the Board.

    
[FR Doc. 2025-02047 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Silas KENDRICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0937

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 296 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 296 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 296 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:05-cv-00184-C Document 296 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Wornick Company (the “Company”) forthe quarterly period ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian A. Lutes, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 15, 2006 |   |                                  |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                       | By:    | /s/ Brian A. Lutes                    |
|                       |   | Brian A. Lutes                        |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

----
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 11 PageID 149
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 11 PageID 150
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 3 of 11 PageID 151
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 4 of 11 PageID 152
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 5 of 11 PageID 153
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 6 of 11 PageID 154
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 7 of 11 PageID 155
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 8 of 11 PageID 156
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 9 of 11 PageID 157
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 10 of 11 PageID 158
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-5 Filed 08/04/06 Page 11 of 11 PageID 159
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

____________________________ _____________ Clerk July 24, 2012

d0716 

# Or der

July 24, 2012

144912

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144912

COA: 307985

Wayne CC: 10

- 013175

- FH

DALLAS JASON LEWIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Cory Barrant SIVIK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3592

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2019]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Kime, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Conner, J., and Metzger, Elizabeth A., Associate Judge, concur.
Anthony MCINTYRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-451

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. § 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**§
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Valley Commerce Bancorp
      (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
      of Donald A. Gilles, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      and
      Roy O. Estridge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
                November 14, 2007
            /s/  
                Donald A. GillesDonald
                A. GillesPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                November 14, 2007
            /s/  
                Roy O. EstridgeRoy
                O. EstridgeChief
                Financial Officer








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
      of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




33
# C_2017213EN.01001502.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden (Germany) lodged on 25 January 2017 — Daher Muse Ahmed v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-36/17)

(2017/C 213/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Minden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Daher Muse Ahmed

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant:

By order of 5 April 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) ruled that the provisions and principles of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (1) which govern, directly or indirectly, the time limits for lodging an application for a take-back are not applicable in a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which a third-country national has lodged an application for international protection in one Member State after being granted the benefit of subsidiary protection by another Member State.

1

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31.

1

---
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 08 -0 00 89 -C V

______________________________

I N RE: EDWARD EL L I OTT B RYANT

Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Edwar d Elliott Br

y ant has filed a

petition for writ of manda mus in which he asks this Court to order the court re porter f or the 208th Judi cial District Court of Ha rris County , Texas, to provide him wi th a c omp le te re po rt e r' s r e c or d s o th a t he c an a de qu a te ly ra ise a ha be a s c or pu s c la im. This Court has jurisdiction to i ssue a wr it of mandamus ag ainst "a judge of a dis t rict or
cou nt y cou rtin th e cou rtof ap peal s d is tr ict ." T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(b) (Ve rnon 2004). We c ann ot a dd

re ss B rya nt' s p e tit ion

fo r wri t of

mand amus for tw o r e a so ns . F ir st, Ha rr is County is not withi n our appe llate district, and we have no ma ndamus au t h o ri t y (except in very sp e c if ic sit uatio ns wh ic h h ave no t bee n all e g e d to e xist h e re ) o ve r e nti tie s o uts ide our d ist ri c t. H arr is County is not withi n the terr itorial juris d i ct i o n o f t his court. T EX . G OV ' T C ODE ANN . § 2 2
. 2 0 1 (g) (V e rn on Sup p. 20 08 ). Thus , w e have no jur isd ic tio n o ve r t he pe tit ion

fo r wri t of

mand amus . Second, we do not h ave ma ndamus authority

over c ourt repor

ters. As set out above , our mand amus a

uth or ity is p ro vid e d b y

statut e , a nd is l imi te d to c e rt a in c a te g or ie s o f j ud ic ia l of fi c ia ls, not including c ourt repor

ters. Ag ain, there are some limit ed ex ceptions t o that g ener al rule, but a g ain, they do not apply

here . Even if we had jurisdi ct i o n t o i s s ue a writ of mandamus, we have no authority in this si tuation to provide the re quested re lief.3

The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Ba iley C. Moseley J ustice Date Submitted: August 18, 2008 Date D ecide d: August 19, 2008