alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 129 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 129

   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
             Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2021

 Mr. Schumer submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
             Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the President of the United States be notified of 
the election of the Honorable Karen H. Gibson as Sergeant at Arms and 
Doorkeeper of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
|   |             |   |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY M FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | November 8, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |             |   | Name:  |   |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |             |   | Title: |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |             |   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |             |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |             |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | November 8, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |             |   | Name:  |   |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |             |   | Title: |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |             |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |             |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |             |   |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
Michael Lewis-Steven JOHNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1877

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

Michael Lewis-Steven Johns, Malone, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Lewis-Steven Johns appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court's order without comment except as to claim three. As to that claim, we reverse.

In claim three, Johns argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the trial court improperly considered impermissible matters-his "psychopathy" and that he might "be a budding psychopath" when there was no evidence to support the trial court's observations. A defendant's due process rights are violated when a trial court considers unsubstantiated matters at sentencing. *See* *McGill v. State*, 148 So. 3d 531, 531-32 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (citing *Crouse v. State*, 101 So. 3d 901, 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ). The failure to preserve such an issue for appeal may well be ineffective assistance of counsel.

As such, we reverse the trial court's summary denial of claim three. On remand, the trial court should either attach additional records to conclusively refute the claim or hold an evidentiary hearing. The court must then decide whether Johns has established that his counsel's performance was deficient and if he was prejudiced as a result. *See* *Grosvenor v. State*, 874 So. 2d 1176, 1178 (Fla. 2004).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Modernizing Education Data Systems 

through Privacy Enhancing Technologies 

(PETs)

Stephanie Straus, M.Ed.

Amy O’Hara, Ph.D.

McCourt School of Public Policy

Georgetown University

FCSM October 25, 2023

Session D-3: New Perspectives and 

Methods on Privacy and Disclosure 

Control
2

2

Education Data Ecosystem
3

3

What Protects Privacy Now?

• Lockdowns (don’t trust anyone)

• Trusted third parties (limited/earned trust)

• Contracts (licenses, NDAs, MOUs)

• Statistical disclosure controls

– Rounding, swapping, suppression, etc.
4

4

What Are Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs)?

• Cryptographic techniques that increase data protection while 

allowing for greater data utility

• Can enhance how data are analyzed and/or published

• Can complement or replace other statistical disclosure 

limitation methods

PETs are safer and more secure ways to analyze, link, and share data
5

5

• Input privacy

– Data access or sharing challenges

– Reduces risks of unauthorized access or inappropriate use

• Output privacy

– Results of data analysis, such as information in tables or 

graphs 

– Reduces the risks of re-identification of data subjects

Two Aspect of Privacy
Is Anyone Using PETs?

66

Conducted 40 stakeholder interviews to identify existing and abandoned projects
Most Common PETs

• Institutions were using:

– Secure multiparty computation

– Secure hashing 

– Secure enclave/trusted execution environment

– Differential privacy

– Synthetic data

77
Secure Multiparty Computation (SMC)

• Education examples: Estonia, Virginia, our NCES demonstration

• Other examples: Boston Women’s Workforce, Allegheny County Department of Human 

Services demonstration, DARPA and IARPA investments

88
9

9

Differential Privacy (DP)

• Education examples: U.S. Census Bureau’s Post-Secondary Employment Outcomes, 

College Scorecard

• Other examples: Census 2020, Google, Apple, Facebook
What Are Barriers to PET Deployment?

1010
Next Steps

11

• PET information and training sessions

• Develop guidance 

• Field Building 

• Demonstration projects

– Synthetic data with Nebraska Statewide Workforce & 

Educational Reporting System

– Secure query system with IRS

• In discussion: Secure enclave and multiparty computation 

with state ed. agencies

11
amy.ohara@georgetown,edu

stephanie.straus@georgetown.edu

Read our report, 

Privacy Preserving Technologies in Education
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)    |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |

November      7, 2006
Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups







              [LETTERHEAD OF FOSTER WHEELER REALTY SERVICES, INC.]



                                                                    Exhibit 10.6



                               As of July 14, 2003


Energy (NJ) QRS 15-10, Inc.
c/o W.P. Carey & Co. LLC
50 Rockefeller Plaza, 2nd Floor
New York, New York 10020
Attention: Director, Asset Management

         Re:      Amendment No. 3
                  Perryville I, Clinton, New Jersey

Dear Director:

         Reference is made to that certain Lease Agreement (the "Lease") dated
August 16, 2002, between Energy (NJ) QRS 15-10, Inc., as Landlord, and Foster
Wheeler Realty Services, Inc., as Tenant, for the above-referenced building (the
"Building").

         Pursuant to Exhibit E of the Lease, we hereby deliver a copy of
Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2003 ("the
Amendment"), and, by so doing, modify the covenants and agreements set forth at
Exhibit E consistent with the Amendment. Upon our receipt of your
countersignature, we will promptly arrange to have the Landlord's Consideration
in the amount of $350,000 (calculated as shown on Exhibit A hereto) released to
you.

         As of the date hereof, no Event of Default under the Lease has occurred
and is continuing.

         Unless otherwise defined herein, each capitalized term herein shall be
deemed to have the meaning assigned to it in the Lease.

         Please indicate your acknowledgement and acceptance of the foregoing by
countersigning and returning a copy of this letter to us. If you require
additional information, please contact the undersigned.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    FOSTER WHEELER REALTY SERVICES, INC.


                                    By: /s/Steven I. Weinstein
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Name:  Steven I. Weinstein
                                      Title: President


We hereby acknowledge and accept the foregoing:

ENERGY (NJ) QRS 15-10, INC.

By:  /s/Tom Lewis
   ---------------------------------
Dated:  July 24, 2003






Page 2
As of July 14, 2003




cc:      Reed Smith LLP
         2500 One Liberty Place
         Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
         Attention: Chairman, Real Estate Department

         Wollf & Samson, P.A.
         5 Becker Farm Road
         Roseland, New Jersey 07068
         Attention: Jeffrey M. Gussoff, Esq.





Page 3
As of July 14, 2003





                                    EXHIBIT A


    Rent Base                                              $44,900,000.00
    Amendment Fee @ .009366                      = .009366*$44,900,000.00
    Gross Fee (before cap)                                    $420,533.00
    Cap per Exh. E, Sec. 3(x)                                 $350,000.00
    Landlord's Consideration                                  $350,000.00
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, the undersigned officers of AmericasBank Corp. (the
Company) each certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained in
that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark H. Anders                   
|Mark H. Anders                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 27, 2008                       



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ A. Gary Rever                                   
|A. Gary Rever                                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 27, 2008                                      

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge
standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 19 (Thursday, January 30, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8541-8542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01917]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: January 30, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby

[[Page 8542]]

gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 23, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
601 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1151, K2025-1151.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2025-01917 Filed 1-29-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 10.2
------------


                          FIFTH AMENDMENT TO

                      AMLI RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES

                              OPTION PLAN



           WHEREAS, Amli Residential Properties Trust, a Maryland real
estate investment trust (the "Trust"), has adopted and maintains the Amli
Residential Properties Option Plan (the "Option Plan"); and

           WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Trust has the authority
to amend the Option Plan; and

           WHEREAS, the members of the Board of Trustees of the Trust now
consider it desirable to amend the Option Plan;

           NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, that the Option Plan shall be,
and it hereby is, amended, effective April 28, 2003, by substituting the
following for Section 6.7(a) of the Option Plan:

           "(a)  Options granted under the Plan shall be exercised by the
     Optionee (or by his executors, administrators, guardian or legal
     representative) as to all or any portion of the Shares or Units then
     exercisable under such Option, by giving the written notice described
     in paragraph (i) below to the Committee administering such Option
     (the REIT Committee, in the case of Options awarded under Section
     6.2) or its designee on or before the date such portion of the Option
     becomes unexercisable under the Plan or the terms of the applicable
     Option Agreement, and by making payment as provided in paragraph (ii)
     below within 3 business days after delivery of the notice:

                 (i)  A written notice of exercise, in a form complying
           with any rules the applicable Committee may issue, that is
           signed by the Optionee and that specifies the number of Shares
           or Units to be purchased; and

                 (ii) Payment to the Employer of the full purchase price
           for the Shares or Units being purchased made in cash, by wire
           transfer or by bank check; or by tendering, by either actual
           delivery of Shares or by attestation, Shares acceptable to the
           Committee, and valued at Fair Market Value as of the day of
           exercise, or in any combination thereof, as determined by the
           Committee.

     In no event may any Option be exercised for a fraction of a Share or
Unit."
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 197 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2021, as ‘‘Silver Star 

Service Banner Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2021 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mr. HAWLEY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 1, 2021, 

as ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’. 

Whereas the Senate has always honored the sacrifices made 

by the wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the Silver Star Service Banner has come to represent the members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

who were wounded or became ill in combat in the wars 

fought by the United States; 

Whereas the Silver Star Families of America was formed to 

help the people of the United States remember the sacrifices made by the wounded and ill members of the 

Armed Forces by designing and manufacturing Silver 

Star Service Banners and Silver Star Flags for that purpose; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 197 ATS 

Whereas the sole mission of the Silver Star Families of 

America is to evoke memories of the sacrifices made by 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans on behalf of 

the United States through the presence of a Silver Star 

Service Banner in a window or a Silver Star Flag flying; 

Whereas the sacrifices made by members of the Armed 

Forces and veterans on behalf of the United States 

should never be forgotten; and 

Whereas May 1, 2021, is an appropriate date to designate as 

‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of May 1, 2021, as 

3 ‘‘Silver Star Service Banner Day’’; and 

4 (2) calls upon the people of the United States 

5 to observe Silver Star Service Banner Day with ap6 propriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOT. TO DESIGNATE 

RECIPIENT 

CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THOMAS E. MOORE III (SBN 115107) 

ROYSE LAW FIRM, PC

149 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 1001 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 813-9700 

Facsimile: (650) 813-9777 

E-mail: tmoore@rroyselaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants and Crossclaimants 

Leonard Gregory Scott and Eureka 

Inventions LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

BESTWAY (USA), INC.; BESTWAY (HONG 

KONG) INTERNATIONAL LTD.; and 

BESTWAY INFLATABLES AND 

MATERIAL CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

PIETRO PASQUALE-ANTONIO SGROMO 

(a/k/a PETER ANTHONY SGROMO); 

WAGMORE & BARKLESS LLC; 

LEONARD GREGORY SCOTT; and 

EUREKA INVENTIONS LLC, 

 Defendants. 

 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG 

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE 

MOTION TO DESIGNATE THE 

RECIPIENT OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF 

THE ROYALTY PAYMENT (as modified) 

 

Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 

AND RELATED CROSSCLAIM 

) 

) 

) 

 

/ / / 

Case 4:17-cv-00205-HSG Document 176 Filed 04/16/20 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOT. TO DESIGNATE 

RECIPIENT

 CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Defendants and crossclaimants Leonard Gregory Scott and Eureka Inventions, LLC (“Scott 

Defendants”), filed an administrative motion requesting that the Court to designate the client’s trust 

account of Royse Law Firm, PC (“Royse”), as the party to whom the Court will distribute the 

interpleaded amount pursuant to the Amended Judgment dated May 31, 2019 (Dkt. No. 157). Good 

cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. The motion is granted. 

2. The funds deposited with the Court (see Dkt. No. 174) and any interest accrued shall be 

distributed to the client trust account of the Scott Defendants’ counsel of record, Royse Law 

Firm, PC. 

Dated: 4/16/2020 ________________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:17-cv-00205-HSG Document 176 Filed 04/16/20 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference to the registration statements of
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") on Forms S-8
(File Nos. 333-59281, 333-64389, 333-78317 and 333-64300) and on Forms S-3
(File Nos. 333-58328, 333-75558, 333-84826 and 333-99693) of our report dated
January 27, 2003 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for the three years ended December
31, 2002, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 10, 2003
<PAGE>

              SINOPEC BEIJING YANHUA PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY LIMITED

                         NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                 (All amounts in thousands, except share data)

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Guo Hong, certify that this annual report on Form 20-F of Sinopec Beijing
Yanhua Petrochemical Company Limited fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Sinopec Beijing
Yanhua Petrochemical Company Limited.

Date: June 26, 2003               /s/ DUO HONG
                                  -------------------------
                                  Guo Hong Chief Financial Officer

NOTICE:

This certification is furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sinopec Beijing Yanhua Petrochemical Company Limited and will be
retained by Sinopec Beijing Yanhua Petrochemical Company Limited and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.