alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 18 (Wednesday, January 29, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01861]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 8700-006]

Amy Family Holdings, LLC, Amy Hydro LLC; Notice of Transfer of 
Exemption

    1. On December 31, 2024, Amy Family Holdings, LLC, and Amy Hydro 
LLC, informed the Commission that the exemption from licensing for the 
Amy Ranch Project No. 8700, originally issued on October 11, 1985,\1\ 
has been transferred to Amy Hydro LLC. The project is located on Deep 
Creek and Black Creek in Butte County, Idaho. The transfer of an 
exemption does not require Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Alan J. Amy, 33 FERC ] 62,045 (1985) (Order Granting 
Exemption from Licensing for a Conduit Hydroelectric Project).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Amy Hydro LLC is now the exemptee of the Amy Ranch Project No. 
8700. All correspondence must be forwarded to: Ted S. Sorenson, Amy 
Hydro LLC, 711 E Turtle Point Dr., Ivins, UT 84738, telephone: (208) 
589-6908; and as a secondary contact: Michael Jardine, Amy Hydro LLC, 
534 Holliday Dr., Ammon, ID 83406, telephone: (208) 589-5256.

    Dated: January 13, 2025.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-01861 Filed 1-28-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
T.G. v. RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160933

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

Affirmed.
Shaunacie Katerra THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3015

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 48 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 48

    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2022

  Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign 
 military sale to the Government of Egypt of certain defense articles 
                             and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the following proposed 
foreign military sale to the Government of Egypt is prohibited:
            (1) The sale of the following defense articles and 
        services, described in Transmittal No. 21-33, submitted to 
        Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export 
        Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the 
        Congressional Record on May 25, 2022:
                    (A) The following Major Defense Equipment (MDE): 
                Five thousand (5,000) TOW 2A, Radio Frequency (RF) 
                Missiles, BGM-71E-4B-RF. Seventy (70) TOW 2A, Radio 
                Frequency (RF) Missiles, BGM-71E-4B-RF (Fly-to-Buy Lot 
                Acceptance Missiles).
                    (B) The following non-MDE: Missile support 
                equipment; technical manuals/publications; spare parts; 
                tool and test equipment; training; U.S. Government 
                technical and logistical support, contractor technical 
                support, and other associated equipment and services; 
                and other related elements of logistical and program 
                support.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Claire S. Bean

Claire S. Bean
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.8
                                                                    ------------


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby  consent  to the use of our  audit  report  dated  March 6, 2007
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of  Abitibi-Consolidated  Inc. (the
"Company")  as at December 31, 2006 and 2005,  the  consolidated  statements of
earnings, deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2006, the  management's  assessment on the  effectiveness of
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  and  the  effectiveness  of  the
Company's  internal  control over  financial  reporting as of December 31, 2006
which is  incorporated  by reference in its (i) Annual Report on Form 40-F/A of
the Company for the fiscal year ended  December  31,  2006,  (ii)  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No.  333-103697),  (iii) Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (File No.  333-14184)  and (iv)  Registration  Statement  on Form F-10
(File No. 333-123117) each filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



/s/ PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------

Chartered Accountants


June 7, 2007
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Case 2:06-cv-00017-J Document 20 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 83
 

 Case 2:06-cv-00017-J Document 20 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 84
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 7150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01327]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Human Genome Research Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Council for Human Genome Research, February 10, 2025, 9 a.m. 
to February 11, 2025, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Capital 
Gateway Building, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 1100, Bethesda, MD 20892 
which was published in the Federal Register on January 10, 2025, 90 FR 
2710.
    Amendment to change the start time of the open session from 10 a.m. 
to 11:30 a.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

    Dated: January 14, 2025.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025-01327 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

FINJAN, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF 

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO 

SUBMIT STIPULATED PROPOSED 

REDACTIONS TO THE COURT’S 

ORDER OF AUGUST 4, 2020 ON OR 

BEFORE AUGUST 11, 2020

[Re: ECF 640]

On August 4, 2020, the Court issued and conditionally sealed its Order Denying Finjan, 

Inc.’s Motion for Relief from Non-Dispositive Pretrial Orders of Magistrate Judge van Keulen 

regarding Cisco Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Strike (ECF 662; 582). See ECF 686. The Order 

references materials that were filed under seal in this case. To give the parties an opportunity to 

request redactions to the Order, the Court directs the parties to submit a stipulated request for 

redactions (or indicate that no redactions are requested) on or before August 11, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2020

______________________________________

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

United States District Judge

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 687 Filed 08/04/20 Page 1 of 1
Greta Jameth MCDONALD v. SOUTHERN HAULERS, LLC

2160384

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 26, 2018

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 10.32**
**Addendum to Employment Contract**
      Agreement made as of December 1, 2004, between Beverly Enterprises, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), and William R. Floyd (the “Executive”);
      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Contract of December 6,2001 between them;
      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and understandings set forth hereinand for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is herebyacknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:
      1. Revise section 4(b)(xiii)iii to read: “lump sum option will be made available with the lump sumpresent value based on the discount rate set forth in Section 4. 4(b) of the 2000 plan, but with noadditional discount, consistent with the Company’s intent as clarified.”
      2. Add a new section 4(b)(xv) which reads: “To continue as a participant in the Company’sExecutive Allowance Program pursuant to its terms.”
      3. Add a new section 4(b)(xvi) which reads: “To continue as a participant in the RetentionEnhancement Program (“REP”) under the Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”),subject to the REP’s and applicable EDCP terms and conditions.”
      4. Add a new section 4(b)(xvii) which reads: “To continue as a participant in the Company’s LongTerm Care Plan pursuant to its terms.”
      5. Revise section 7(c)(ii) to read: “The Company shall maintain in force, at its own expense, forthe remainder of the Executive’s life, life insurance under the Company’s Executive Split DollarLife Insurance Plan in an amount not less than $835,000.00, naming the Executive as beneficiary,and payable to Executive’s estate upon death.”
      The parties have duly executed this Agreement to be effective as of the date first writtenabove.     Beverly Enterprises, Inc. Executive    By:         Chair, Nominating andCompensation Committee
# C_2016287EN.01003102.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/31

---

Action brought on 21 June 2016 — Moravia Consulting v EUIPO — Citizen Systems Europe (SDC-444S)

(Case T-318/16)

(2016/C 287/38)

Language in which the application was lodged: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Moravia Consulting spol. s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Citizen Systems Europe GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘SDC-444S’– Application for registration No 12 780 061

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2016 in Case R 1573/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 18 PageID 78
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 18 PageID 79
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 3 of 18 PageID 80
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 4 of 18 PageID 81
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 5 of 18 PageID 82
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 6 of 18 PageID 83
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 7 of 18 PageID 84
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 8 of 18 PageID 85
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 9 of 18 PageID 86
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 10 of 18 PageID 87
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 11 of 18 PageID 88
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 12 of 18 PageID 89
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 13 of 18 PageID 90
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 14 of 18 PageID 91
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 15 of 18 PageID 92
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 16 of 18 PageID 93
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 17 of 18 PageID 94
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00255-N Document 12 Filed 08/04/06 Page 18 of 18 PageID 95
Michael MULROONEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1568

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Karen A. CRANE and James W. Laird, Appellants, v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE BY RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC f/k/a Residential Funding Corporation Attorney Infact, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-146

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 21, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
US. DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT|CoURT __ FILED
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION SEP -9 008
CLERK, US. DISTRICT COURT
PHIL EDWIN GARNER, § By
§ Deputy
Petitioner, §
§
v. § 2:05-CV-0258
§
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, §
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §
Correctional Institutions Division, §
§
Respondent. §

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS,

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,

and DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Petitioner has filed with this Court an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in

state custody. On August 8, 2008, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and

Recommendation in this cause, recommending therein that habeas relief be denied. On August 21,

2008, respondent filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. As of this date, petitioner has

not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the

record in this case. The objections filed by respondent are hereby OVERRULED. The Magistrate

Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of

habeas corpus filed by petitioner is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED this Jt day Ly yp tettMUee 2 2008.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
##### 



10.1
 LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.  Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
 Grant
Number N <<Option Number>>
 This Agreement Participant March 1, 2007
  Grant of Option Shares Price March 1, 2017
  2007 EPS
    
    Percentage Forfeited$2.65 or more per share
    
    
    0
    %$2.62 to $2.64
    
    
    25
    %$2.59 to $2.61
    
    
    40
    %$2.56 to $2.58
    
    
    45
    %$2.52 to $2.55
    
    
    50
    %$2.50 to $2.51
    
    
    55
    %$2.48 to $2.49
    
    
    60
    %$2.46 to $2.47
    
    
    65
    %$2.44 to $2.45
    
    
    70
    %$2.42 to $2.43
    
    
    75
    %Below $2.42 per share
    
    
    100
    %




---



##### 



Method of Exercise
 Restriction on Transfer of Option
  2
        Status of Participant
   Adjustments
 Termination of Service
   3




---



##### 



provided however
 Investment Representation
 4




---



##### 



Change in Control
   Committee Authority
 Plan Controls
 Notices
 5




---



##### 



Information Confidential
 Governing Law
 In Witness Whereof
 LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.William F. Carpenter IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 6
April 25, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PAUL ANTHONY WELCH , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00430

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Virginia I. YOUNG, Appellant, v. Pam STEWART, Commissioner of Education, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3040

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
A.R.Z. III v. In the matter of I.Z.P.

2170498

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

Dismissed.
# C_2016441EN.01003102.xml

| 28.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 441/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/31

---

Action brought on 4 October 2016 — Waldhausen v EUIPO (Representation of the silhouette of a horse’s head)

(Case T-717/16)

(2016/C 441/37)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Waldhausen GmbH & Co. KG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: V. Ekey, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of the silhouette of a horse’s head) — Application for registration No 14 588 933

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 August 2016 in Case R 1195/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
B.C. v. M.A., P.H.B., T.C., and C.C.

2170303

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 5, 2018

Transferred to DeKalb Cir. Ct. for trial de novo pursuant to Rule 28(D), Ala.R.Juv.P.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report of IroncladPerformance Wear Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Aisenberg, Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

 

/s/ William Aisenberg

William Aisenberg

Principal Financial Officer

May 11, 2015
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ideal Financial Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven L. Sunyich, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/  Steven L. SunyichSteven L. Sunyich, CEONovember 15, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DYNAMIC ALERT LIMITED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley Hawkings, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2007

By: ***/s/ Bradley Hawkings***

Bradley Hawkings

Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

----
Robert Paul SHELEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2041

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed December 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.