alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

DEFENDANT CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S CORRECTED EXHIBIT NO. 32 TO GRIGG DECLARATION 

N’T NEEDUANE MORRIS LLP

Nicole E. Grigg (CA SBN 307733) 

negrigg@duanemorris.com 

D. Stuart Bartow (CA SBN 233107) 

dsbartow@duanemorris.com 

2475 Hanover Street 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194 

Telephone: 650.847.4146 

Facsimile: 650.847.4151 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590) 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

japowers@duanemorris.com 

Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038) 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

jmgunther@duanemorris.com 

30 South 17th Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Telephone: 215.979.1000 

Facsimile: 215.979.1020 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

L. Norwood Jameson (GA SBN 003970) 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

wjameson@duanemorris.com 

Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287789) 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

mcgaudet@duanemorris.com 

David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040) 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

dcdotson@duanemorris.com 

John R. Gibson (GA SBN 454507) 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

jrgibson@duanemorris.com 

Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650) 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

jhforte@duanemorris.com 

Alice E. Snedeker 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice

aesnedeker@duanemorris.com 

1075 Peachtree NE, Suite 2000 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: 404.253.6900 

Facsimile: 404.253.6901 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California 

Corporation, 

Defendant. 

 

Case No.: 5:17-cv-00072-BLF-SVK

DEFENDANT CISCO SYSTEMS, 

INC.’S CORRECTED EXHIBIT NO. 32 

TO GRIGG DECLARATION [ECF 571] 

Date: April 30, 2020

Time: 1:30 PM 

Hon. Beth Labson Freeman 

Ctrm: 3, 5TH Floor 

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 592 Filed 04/29/20 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

DEFENDANT CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.’S CORRECTED EXHIBIT NO. 32 TO GRIGG DECLARATION 

 Defendant Cisco Systems Inc. hereby submits [CORRECTED] Exhibit 32 to the Grigg 

Declaration filed on April 23, 2020 (ECF 571). Exhibit 32 is cited in Cisco’s Opposition to Finjan’s 

Motion in Limine No. 2 (ECF 568). 

Dated: April 29, 2020 DUANE MORRIS LLP 

/s/ Nicole E. Grigg 

Nicole E. Grigg 

D. Stuart Bartow 

L. Norwood Jameson (admitted pro hac vice) 

Matthew C. Gaudet (admitted pro hac vice) 

David C. Dotson (admitted pro hac vice) 

John R. Gibson (admitted pro hac vice) 

Jennifer H. Forte (admitted pro hac vice) 

Joseph A. Powers (admitted pro hac vice) 

Jarrad M. Gunther (admitted pro hac vice) 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 592 Filed 04/29/20 Page 2 of 2
Verdell HUNT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0551

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
Fred GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3527

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 17, 2019]

Fred Gray, Quincy, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

***ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA***

Per Curiam.

Upon remand from the Florida Supreme Court, we reverse appellant's sentence in accordance with *State v. Lewars* , 259 So.3d 793 (Fla. 2018), and remand for resentencing.

Warner, Conner and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 28, 2025 / Presidential Documents 8251 

Memorandum of January 20, 2025 

Return to In-Person Work 

Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies 

Heads of all departments and agencies in the executive branch of Government 

shall, as soon as practicable, take all necessary steps to terminate remote 

work arrangements and require employees to return to work in-person at 

their respective duty stations on a full-time basis, provided that the department and agency heads shall make exemptions they deem necessary. 

This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 20, 2025 

[FR Doc. 2025–01907 

Filed 1–27–25; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O3Trump.EPS</GPH>
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 236 

To authorize testimony, documents, and representation in United States v. 

Wornick. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2021 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony, documents, and representation in 

United States v. Wornick. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Wornick, Cr. No. 

20–106, pending in the United States District Court for 

the District of Colorado, the prosecution has requested 

the production of testimony and, if necessary, documents 

from Bailey McCue, an employee of the office of former 

Senator Cory Gardner; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current and former employees of the Senate with 

respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 

or documents relating to their official responsibilities; 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 236 ATS 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Bailey McCue, an employee of the of2 fice of former Senator Cory Gardner, and any other em3 ployee of the former Senator’s office from whom relevant 

4 evidence may be necessary, are authorized to testify and 

5 produce documents in the case of United States v. 

6 Wornick, except concerning matters for which a privilege 

7 should be asserted. 

8 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

9 represent Senator Gardner and any employees of his 

10 former office in connection with the production of evidence 

11 authorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
1
2

Founded in 1971,

Knowledge Alliance (KA) is composed of 

19 leading education organizations

that share the belief that

high-quality, relevant research is critical 

to solving education problems

facing our country today.

Who is Knowledge Alliance?
KA Works to Ensure That:

3

Rigorous research and evaluation is championed and used 

by policymakers and educators for improved outcomes and 

increased equitable access to high-quality teaching and 

learning for all students.

Systems changes are made at the Federal, State and local 

levels to ensure and support the policies and practices 

needed to integrate research into practice.

Robust public funding and public policy exists for rigorous 

research and evaluation focused on continuous improvement 

and impact.
4

NASEM report recognized that: 

• Contractors and external experts play 

an integral part in how NCES 

accomplishes its mission now and in 

the future.

• Contractors to support innovation and 

to build internal capacity.

Private Sector Roles in the 

Future Data Ecosystem
5

1.IES is underfunded and overburdened

2.IES must continue to invest in equitable 

education research

3.IES must operate together rather than in 

silos

4.The National Board of Education Sciences 

(NBES) must be populated as soon as 

possible

4 Common Themes Across 3 

Reports
6

1.Prior to largescale undertaking of 

recommendations, NBES should be 

populated. 

2.NCES needs increased funding before it 

can begin to expand data sources for new 

insights.

3.Supports recommendation to assist SEAs 

and LEAs with data facilitation.

KA Comments on “A Vision and Roadmap for 

Education Statistics”
7

Agree with panel recommendations to 

use contractors to:

• Identify best practices

• Pilot new, potentially transformational 

approaches

• Use contractors to build internal 

capacity

KA Comments on “A Vision and Roadmap for 

Education Statistics”
8

Strongly support panel’s 

recommendation to explore 

greater use of flexible contract 

types.

KA Comments on “A Vision and Roadmap for 

Education Statistics”
9

Contractors can help NCES 

deepen and broaden its 

engagement with current 

potential data users and 

strengthen its user community.

KA Comments on “A Vision and Roadmap for 

Education Statistics”
10
Marjesta Quintin KINGCADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2693

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
{CEP-00755118;1}

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Form CAND 133 (Rev. 2/2017)

BILL OF COSTS 

Please follow the instructions on page 3 when completing this form.

COU

OBJECTION DEADLINE: 5

OBJECTION FILED: YES 

1. CASE NAME Jacqueline Zhang v. County of Monterey, et al. 

2. CASE NUMBER

17-CV-00007-LHK 

3. DATE JUDGMENT ENTERED April 24, 2018 

4. PARTY AGAINST WHO

Plaintiff 

5. NAME OF CLAIMING PARTY

Defendant, County of Monterey 

6. NAME OF ATTORNEY FOR CLAIMING PARTY (or indicate “PRO SE”)

Christopher E. Panetta 

7. PHONE AND EMAIL O

(831) 373-1241; cpane

8. REQUEST TO TAX THE FOLLOWING AS COSTS: (SHADED AREAS ARE FOR COURT 

COST ITEM AMOUNT CLAIMED LIST SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Amt Allowed Disallowed 

a. FEES OF THE CLERK AND FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS 

Filing Fees and Docket Fees, Civil LR 54-3(a)(1), 18 U.S.C. 1923 Service of Process, Civil LR 54-3(a)(2) 

b. REPORTERS’ TRANSCRIPTS 

Transcripts for appeal, Civil LR 54-3(b)(1) Rulings from the bench, Civil LR 54-3(b)(2) Other transcripts (by order or 

stipulation), Civil LR 54-3(b)(3) 

c. DEPOSITIONS 

Deposition transcript/video 

recording, Civil LR 54-3(c)(1) 

$3,170.10 Declaration of Christopher E. Panetta, Exhibit 

1 

$3,170.10 

Deposition exhibits, Civil LR 54-3(c)(3) Notary & reporter attendance fees, Civil LR 54-3(c)(4),(5) 

d. REPRODUCTION, EXEMPLIFICATION 

Government records, Civil LR 54-3(d)(1) Disclosure/formal discovery documents, Civil LR 54-3(d)(2) 

$2,108.50 Declaration of Christopher E. Panetta, Exhibit 

2 

$0.00 $2,108.50 A/Sup

E/Not 

Trial exhibits, Civil LR 54-3(d)(4) 

Case 5:17-cv-00007-LHK Document 79 Filed 06/21/18 Page 1 of 2
{CEP-00755118;1}

*WITNESS FEES/EXPENSES COMPUTATION WORKSHEET FOR ITEM 8.e OF REQUEST TO TAX COSTS (28 USC 1821) 

ATTENDANCE SUBSISTENCE TRAVEL/MI

WITNESS NAME , CITY AND STATE OF RESIDENCE # Days $ Cost # Days $ Cost Travel Cost or # Miles POV 

Mark Mariscal, Altadena, California 

TOTAL WITNESS FEES/EXPENSES 

Visual aids, Civil LR 54(d)(5) 

e. WITNESS FEES AND EXPENSES 

Total from itemized Witness Fees worksheet,* Civil LR 54(e) 

$62.68 Declaration of Christopher E. Panetta, Exhibit 

3 

$39.68 $23.00 A/S

f. COURT-APPOINTED PROFESSIONALS, INTERPRETERS 

Fees for special masters & receivers, Civil LR 54-3(f) Court-appointed experts, 28 USC § 1920(6) Interpreters and special interpretation services, 28 USC §§ 1828, 1920(6) 

g. MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 

Costs on appeal, Civil LR 54-3(g) & FRAP 39 Costs of bonds and security, 

Civil LR 54-3(h) 

TOTAL AMOUNT $5,341.28 $3209.78 $ 2,131.50

9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, NOTES, ETC: 10. AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 28 USC § 1924: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing costs are correct and were necessarily incurred in this action and that the services for which fees have been charged were actually and necessarily performed. Name of Attorney/Claiming Party: SIGNATURE: DATE: 

11. Costs are taxed in the amount of $3209.78 and included in t

Susan Y. Soong Clerk of Court BY: Tiffany Salinas-Harwell, Deputy Clerk DATE: 6/21/2018

Case 5:17-cv-00007-LHK Document 79 Filed 06/21/18 Page 2 of 2
|   |            |   |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY M FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | August 10, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |            |   | Name:  |   |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |            |   | Title: |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |            |   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |            |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | August 10, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |            |   | Name:  |   |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |            |   | Title: |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |            |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |            |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
2010 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-15-2010

Hartford Accident & Indemnity v. Lawrence

Fitzpatrick

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 08-3650

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2010 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Hartford Accident & Indemnity v. Lawrence Fitzpatrick" (2010). 2010 Decisions. Paper 1067.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010/1067
W ill participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d. Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4. 

1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 08-3650

_____________

In re: GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

 Debtors

------------------------------

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY; 

FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY CO; 

TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; 

CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, as successor to CIGNA Specialty Company, 

formerly known as California Union Insurance Company; 

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, for itself and for International 

Insurance Company (now known as TIG Insurance Company)

(by operation of novation all rights and obligations under the policies 

have been transferred from International Insurance Co. to Westchester Fire Insurance Co.);

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF

PITTSBURGH, PA; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA;

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY; AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, 

and any other entities related to American International Group, Inc. 

that engaged in business transactions with the Reorganizing Debtors, 

 Appellants

PRESENT: MCKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER,

CHAGARES, JORDAN, VANASKIE, and NYGAARD , Circuit Judges. 

1

A M E N D E D O R D E R*

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it

is ordered that the Clerk of this Court list the above case for rehearing en banc at the convenience

of the Court.

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee

DATED: June 15, 2010 Chief Judge 

crg/cc: All counsel of record
Carla HILEMAN and Jon C. Janney, Appellants, v. Jackie Allen RYAN, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1830

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Peter Aurelien BILLIOT Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2149

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 21, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 1

To Declaration of Jarad Brown in Support of 

Federal Trade Commission’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment
PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

3:17-CV-00039-JD 27 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Appendix A 

Routers IP cameras 

DIR-412 

DIR-505/505L 

DIR-605/605L 

DIR-615 

DIR-626L 

DIR-636L 

DIR-645 

DIR-808L 

DIR-810L 

DIR-815 

DIR-817L 

DIR-818L 

DIR-820L 

DIR-822/822-US 

DIR-823 

DIR-826L 

DIR-830L 

DIR-836L 

DIR-850L 

DIR-855/855L 

DIR-868L 

DIR-880L 

DIR-890L 

DIR-895L 

DCS-8xxL/ 

DCS-825L 

DCS-9xx 

DCS-930L 

DCS-931L 

DCS-932L 

DCS-933L/1150 

DCS-934L 

DCS-935L 

DCS-940/940L 

DCS-942L (and “newer” cameras as of 

January 2013) 

DCS-943L 

DCS-960L 

DCS-1100/1100L 

DCS-1130/1130L 

DCS-2103 

DCS-2130 

DCS-2132L 

DCS-2136L 

DCS-2210 

DCS-2230 

DCS-2310/2310L 

DCS-2330/2330L 

DCS-2332L 

DCS-2360L 

DCS-3112 

DCS-3410 

DCS-3411 

DCS-3430 

DCS-3710 

DCS-3716 

DCS-5009L 

DCS-5010L 

DCS-5020L 

DCS-5029L 

DCS-5202L 

DCS-5211/5211L 

DCS-5222/5222L 

DCS-5605 

DCS-5635 

DCS-6004L 

DCS-6010L 
PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

3:17-CV-00039-JD 28 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DCS-6210 

DCS-6510 

DCS-6511 

DCS-6513 

DCS-6616 

DCS-6818 

DCS-681x 

DCS-7010L 

DCS-7413 

DCS-7513
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner, 

v. 

JOSE HERNANDEZ, 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 17-CV-00040-BLF

[Proposed] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 

ISSUANCE OF A BENCH WARRANT

Good cause having been shown by the United States upon its Application for Entry of Order to 

Show Cause Re: Issuance of a Bench Warrant, and the Declaration of Thomas Moore, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the Respondent appear in person before this Court on the 21th day of 

June, 2018, at 9 a.m., in Courtroom No. 1, 5th Floor, United States Courthouse, 280 South First Street, 

San Jose, California, and then and there show cause, if any he has, why a bench warrant should not be 

issued for his arrest for failure to comply with the IRS summonses as enforced by the Order Requiring 

Respondent to Appear Before Revenue Officer to Give Testimony and Provide Items Described in 

Summonses, ECF No. 16; and it is further

 ORDERED that the United States is ordered to personally serve the Respondent Jose Hernandez 

a copy of this order to show cause within seven (7) days of this order; and it is further 

ORDERED that within seven (7) days before the return date of this Order, the Respondent may 

file and serve a written response to the Order To Show Cause Re: Issuance of a Bench Warrant, 
[proposed] Order To Show Cause

C-17-00040-BLF 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

supported by appropriate affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, as well as 

any motions he desires to make; that the Petitioner may file and serve a written reply to such 

response, if any, within three (3) days before the return date of this Order; that all motions and issues 

raised by the pleadings will be considered on the return date of this Order, and only those issues raised 

by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit(s) or 

declaration(s) will be considered at the return of this Order.

ORDERED this _________day of ________________________, 2018, at San Jose, California. 

 _________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WK 0D\
Bryant Elijah DEXTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Tim F. Bower RODRIGUEZ, Esq., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0926

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Francois JEAN-DUCASSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1094

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Georgetown  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert E. Balletto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Joseph W. Kennedy, Senior Vice President,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  act of 2002 and in  connection  with this
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB,  that we have reviewed the Form 10-QSB and that
to the best of our knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of sections 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the Company's  financial  condition and results of
          operations as of the date and for the periods covered by the Report.


Date: November 10, 2005             /s/ Robert E. Balletto
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Robert E. Balletto
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Chief Executive Officer)


                                    /s/ Joseph W. Kennedy
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Joseph W. Kennedy
                                    Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)