alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ARIANA ARIAS,

Defendant. /

No. CR-05-0301 MAG

SEALING ORDER PURSUANT TO

GENERAL ORDER 54

The following documents in this action are placed under seal and shall not be opened

except by the United States Sentencing Commission for its eyes only and shall not be

transmitted or otherwise opened except by order of this court upon application.

: Presentence Report 

9 Plea Agreement

9 Statement of Reasons

9 

(Other)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2006 

HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Case 3:05-cr-00301-MEJ Document 17 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUBBOCK DIVISION

ROGER D. PFEIL, )

Institutional ID No. 18630, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

LT. RUBEN TORRES, et al., )

) Civil Action No. 5:05-CV-289-C

Defendant. ) ECF

ORDER

On August 4, 2008, the Court entered an order directing the United States Marshal

(hereinafter “the USM”) to serve process on the Defendants, including Defendant Lt. Skinner. 

On December 8, 2008, the USM filed his return of service indicating that he has been unable to

locate Defendant Lt. Skinner for service of process. The USM provided information that the

Defendant no longer worked at the Bill Clayton Detention Center but was directed to the

Roosevelt County Detention Center in Portales, New Mexico. The USM traveled to the

Roosevelt County Detention Center in an unsuccessful attempt to serve Defendant at that

location.

By Order dated December 18, 2008, Plaintiff was ordered to provide additional

information with which to locate Defendant Lt. Skinner for service of process and was

admonished that failure to provide such information would result in dismissal of Defendant Lt.

Skinner. In response, Plaintiff notified the Court of two possible addresses for Defendant Lt.

Skinner; one in Conroe, Texas, and the other in Woodville, Texas. On January 22, 2009, the

Case 5:05-cv-00289-C Document 70 Filed 08/31/2009 Page 1 of 2
2

Court entered an order directing the USM to serve process on Defendant Lt. Skinner at the

addresses provided. On August 12, 2009, the USM filed his return of service again indicating

that he was unable to locate Defendant Lt. Skinner, despite attempts to call him from different

phone lines, as well as visiting the addresses provided by Plaintiff. The Court finds that Plaintiff

has failed to provide sufficient information with which to locate and serve Defendant Lt.

Skinner.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint and all claims alleged against

Defendant Lt. Skinner are dismissed without prejudice.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Dated August 31, 2009.

_________________________________

SAM R. CUMMINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 5:05-cv-00289-C Document 70 Filed 08/31/2009 Page 2 of 2
ALIMGMT ALABAMA, INC., and Ali Hamid v. TEAM HOLDINGS, LLC

1160262

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Joe Nathan JAMES, Jr.

1160971 (CR-16-0229)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Cert. denied.
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Mark                Klein                                                                                   |   |   |   |
| Name: Mark              Klein                                                                                   |   |   |        |
| Title: Chief                Executive Officer, President and                                                    |   |   |   |
| Director                (Principal Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial                  and Accounting Officer) |   |   |   |
| Date: October 3, 2006                                                                                                |   |   |   |

----
**Certification      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                                     |                                     |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                      | **PACIFIC                COAST NATIONAL BANCORP**        |
|                                 |                                                |                                |
| Date: August                22, 2005 | By:                                            | /s/ Colin                M. Forkner |
|                                      |                                                          |
|                                      | Colin                  M. ForknerChief Executive Officer |
|                                      |                                                     |

|                                        |                                                  |                                  |
|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Date: August                  22, 2005 | By:                                         | /s/ Terry                  Stalk |
|                                        |                                                       |
|                                        | Terry                    StalkChief Financial Officer |
|                                        |                                                  |
|                                        |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 4, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. (“PXI Systems”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, PEAK-System Technik GmbH, Darmstadt, GERMANY; Shikino High-Tech Co. Ltd., Toyama, JAPAN; TEVET, Greeneville, TN; Vector Informatik GmbH, Stuttgart, GERMANY; and XIA LLC Associates, Oakland, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PXI Systems intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 2, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2024 (89 FR 82629).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2025-02105 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00244-CV 

David K. Norvelle, Sylvia Norvelle, 

and/or all occupants 

v. 

Beauly, LLC 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From County Court at Law No. 1 

of Tarrant County (2015-000732-1) 

June 23, 2016 

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

It is further ordered that appellants David K. Norvelle and Sylvia Norvelle 

shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston 

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. www.rti.org

SMART: An Open Source Tool to Facilitate 

Auto-Coding

Caroline Kery

Government Advances in Statistical Programming (GASP!) Workshop

Sep 23rd, 2019

1
Motivation – Unstructured Text data

2
Coding

 Text data often needs to be organized (labeled or coded) for further 

analysis to be possible

3
Bottlenecks of Data Labeling

4 Bottleneck by Electric Cloud
Coding and Machine learning 

 Possible solution, train a machine to label things for you!

5
Example: Auto-coders

6

NIOSH Industry & 

Occupation Computerized 

Coding System (NIOCCS)
But still...

7 Bottleneck by Electric Cloud

• Many machine learning labelers use supervised learning which 

leverages existing labeled data to learn how to label new data. 

• In practice, this means that to create successful auto-coders, we 

still need large amounts of manually labeled data.
SMART

8
SMART Overview

9

Coders Data Labels

SMART Project

Assign data

Labeled Data Model

Admin Dashboard

Project Admin
SMART – Organizing labeling tasks

10
SMART – Inter-rater reliability

11
SMART – Inter-rater reliability cont.

12
SMART – Admin Page: Monitor labeling

13
SMART – Monitor model progress

14
SMART - Properties

15
SMART Features – Bringing it together

16

https://rtiinternational.github.io/SMART/
User Documentation - https://smart-app.readthedocs.io/ 

17
There’s also a paper!

 We also have a paper!

18
Questions?

Caroline Kery

Data Scientist

RTI International

19
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

HYDE & SWIGART

San Diego, California

Crosby S. Connolly, Esq. (SBN: 286650) 

crosby@westcoastlitigation.com

HYDE & SWIGART

2221 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 101 

San Diego, CA 92108 

Telephone: (619) 233-7770 

Facsimile: (619) 297-1022 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

Sonia E. Anaya 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Sonia E. Anaya (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and Defendant D. Scott 

Carruthers, (hereinafter “Defendant”), (all jointly hereinafter referred to as “the 

Parties”), hereby move to dismiss the above entitled action with prejudice, with this 

Court to retain jurisdiction for purposes of settlement. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL - 1 of 2 - 3:17-cv-00076-MEJ

Sonia E. Anaya, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

D. Scott Carruthers, A Professional 

Corporation,

 Defendant.

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00076-MEJ

JOINT MOTION FOR 

DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE 

HON. MAGISTRATE MARIAELENA JAMES

Case 3:17-cv-00076-MEJ Document 33 Filed 10/19/17 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

HYDE & SWIGART

San Diego, California

 WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that this Court dismiss 

this action with prejudice, with this Court to retain jurisdiction for purposes of 

settlement. 

Dated: October 19, 2017 HYDE & SWIGART

 By: s/Crosby S. Connolly 

 Crosby S. Connolly 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: October 19, 2017 

 By: s/John Robert Marshall

 John Robert Marshall 

 Attorney for Defendant 

Signature Certification 

Pursuant to Section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative 

Policies and Procedures Manual, I hereby certify that the content of this document 

is acceptable to John Robert Marshall, counsel for the Defendant, and that I have 

obtained his authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document. 

Dated; October 19, 2017 Hyde & Swigart 

/s/ Crosby S. Connolly 

 Crosby S. Connolly 

 Attorney for Plaintiff

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL - 2 of 2 - 3:17-cv-00076-MEJ

Case 3:17-cv-00076-MEJ Document 33 Filed 10/19/17 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 20 (Friday, January 31, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8682-8683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01979]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 501 and 552

[GSAR Case 2024-G502; Docket No. GSA-GSAR-2024-0022; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 3090-AK81

General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); 
Update to OMB Approval Table

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, General Services Administration 
(GSA).

ACTION: Final rule; postponement of effectiveness.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration is postponing the 
effectiveness of amendments that appeared in the Federal Register on 
December 27, 2024, to provide for a 60-day postponement of the 
effectiveness in compliance with the Presidential Memorandum titled 
Regulatory Freeze Pending Review, signed on January 20, 2025, by 
President Donald J. Trump.

DATES: This rule is effective March 27, 2025. As of January 31, 2025, 
the effectiveness of the amendments to 48 CFR parts 501 and 552 
published at 89 FR 105474, December 27, 2024, are postponed until March 
27, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, contact 
Ms. Adina Torberntsson, Procurement Analyst, at [email protected] or 
720-475-0568. For information pertaining to status or publication 
schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat at [email protected] or 
202-501-4755. Please cite GSAR Case 2024-G502.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Final Rule and Postponement of Effectiveness

    The General Services Administration is postponing the effectiveness 
of amendments in the General Services Administration Acquisition 
Regulation

[[Page 8683]]

titled ``Update to OMB Approval Table,'' that appeared in the Federal 
Register on December 27, 2024, to provide for a 60-day postponement in 
the effectiveness in compliance with the Presidential Memorandum titled 
``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review,'' signed on January 20, 2025, by 
President Donald J. Trump.
    Accordingly, GSA is correcting the regulations to provide for an 
update to the effective date of GSAR provision 552.270-1 from JAN 2025 
to MAR 2025.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 552

    Government procurement.

Jeffrey A. Koses,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Government-wide Policy, General Services Administration.

    Therefore, GSA amends 48 CFR part 552 as set forth below:

PART 552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 552 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c).

552.270-1  [Amended]

0
2. Amend section 552.270-1 by removing the provision date ``JAN 2025'' 
and adding in its place the date ``MAR 2025''.

[FR Doc. 2025-01979 Filed 1-30-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-P
```
James AMISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-753

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 4, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Case 3:06-cv-00457-H Document 9 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 48
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUIS B. CABRERA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 17-cv-00164-PJH 

JUDGMENT

The court having granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s federal claims 

with prejudice,

it is Ordered and Adjudged

that plaintiff take nothing on these causes of action. 

The Clerk shall close the file and remand the state law claims to the Superior 

Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2017

__________________________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge

Case 4:17-cv-00164-PJH Document 26 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 1
Welcome to Session A-5

Transparent Quality Reporting 

in the Integration of Multiple Data Sources

Chair: Mary Bohman 

Economic Research Service, USDA
Background: Interagency Council on Statistical 

Policy

- Recognized the increasing importance of 

non-survey data sources in production of 

key statistical series

- Question: Transparent ways in which to 

discuss the quality of these data with our 

key stakeholders?
Result: FCSM working group

This session: 

Overview and selected results to date

Session H-5 (10:30 – 12:15, Friday, March 9):

Broad classes of opportunities for related 

research in methodology and applications
Speakers for This Session:

John L. Eltinge, Census Bureau

Mark Prell, ERS-USDA

Wendy L. Martinez, BLS

Jennifer D. Parker, NCHS
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal,
      President, Chief Executive Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of
      Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.




















*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Executive Officer






April
      13,
      2006




**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
        10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal, Chief
        Financial Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of Directors, certify,
        pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   (1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
        condition and result of operations of NSM.
    */s/
        Zuber Jamal*
 Zuber
        Jamal
 Chief
        Financial Officer
   April
        13,
        2006
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-K
  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  By:
    /s/  Bruce
    A. Walicek   Interim President and Chief Executive
 Officer