# C_2017269EN.01000701.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava (Slovakia) lodged on 26 May 2017 — FENS spol. s r.o. v Slovak Republic — Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví

(Case C-305/17)

(2017/C 269/10)

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Referring court

Okresný súd Bratislava

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FENS spol. s r.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Slovak Republic — Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 30 TFEU be interpreted as precluding a national rule such as Article 12(9) of the Nariadenie vlády Slovenskej republiky č. 317/2007 Z. z., ktorým sa ustanovujú pravidlá pre fungovanie trhu s elektrinou (Regulation No 317/2007 of the Government of the Slovak Republic laying down rules for the functioning of the market in electricity — ‘the regulation’) which introduces a specific pecuniary charge for the export of electricity from the territory of the Slovak Republic, regardless of whether that electricity is exported from Slovak territory to the Member States of the European Union or to third countries, in circumstances in which the electricity exporter fails to demonstrate that the electricity exported has been imported into the Slovak Republic, that is to say, a pecuniary charge levied solely on electricity generated in the Republic of Slovakia and exported from it? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 30 TFEU be interpreted as precluding a national rule such as Article 12(9) of the Nariadenie vlády Slovenskej republiky č. 317/2007 Z. z., ktorým sa ustanovujú pravidlá pre fungovanie trhu s elektrinou (Regulation No 317/2007 of the Government of the Slovak Republic laying down rules for the functioning of the market in electricity — ‘the regulation’) which introduces a specific pecuniary charge for the export of electricity from the territory of the Slovak Republic, regardless of whether that electricity is exported from Slovak territory to the Member States of the European Union or to third countries, in circumstances in which the electricity exporter fails to demonstrate that the electricity exported has been imported into the Slovak Republic, that is to say, a pecuniary charge levied solely on electricity generated in the Republic of Slovakia and exported from it?

| 2. | Does a pecuniary charge, such as the charge introduced by Article 12(9) of the [regulation], namely: a charge applied solely to electricity generated in the Slovak Republic and at the same time exported from the territory of the Slovak Republic, regardless of whether it is exported to third countries or to the Member States of the European Union, also constitute a charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty within the meaning of Article 28(1) TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does a pecuniary charge, such as the charge introduced by Article 12(9) of the [regulation], namely: a charge applied solely to electricity generated in the Slovak Republic and at the same time exported from the territory of the Slovak Republic, regardless of whether it is exported to third countries or to the Member States of the European Union, also constitute a charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty within the meaning of Article 28(1) TFEU?

| 3. | Is a national rule such Article 12(9) of the [regulation] compatible with the principle of free movement of goods laid down by Article 28 TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is a national rule such Article 12(9) of the [regulation] compatible with the principle of free movement of goods laid down by Article 28 TFEU?

---