alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7172-7173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01349]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-1476]

Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Groff 
Health, Inc.

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Groff Health, Inc. has applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled

[[Page 7173]]

substance(s). Refer to Supplementary Information listed below for 
further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before 
March 24, 2025. Such persons may also file a written request for a 
hearing on the application on or before March 24, 2025.

ADDRESSES: The Drug Enforcement Administration requires that all 
comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into 
the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier 
comments. Please go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the 
online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon 
submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. 
Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously 
available for public view on https://www.regulations.gov. If you have 
received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully 
submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on September 27, 2024, Groff Health Inc., 2218 South 
Queen Street, York, Pennsylvania 17402-4631 applied to be registered as 
a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Drug
          Controlled substance            code           Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Psilocybin.............................    7437  I
Psilocyn...............................    7438  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled 
substances for internal use or for sale to its customers. No other 
activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration.

Matthew Strait,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2025-01349 Filed 1-17-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Ambrea Lashae Love WATERS v. Michael Dewayne LOVE

2160441

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published the name of one individual that has been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this individual are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with this individual.

# DATES:

                        This action was issued on January 17, 2025. See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         for relevant dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        OFAC: Associate Director for Global Targeting, 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance, 202-622-2490 or                         *https://ofac.treasury.gov/​contact-ofac.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website:                     *https://ofac.treasury.gov.*

## Notice of OFAC Action

On January 17, 2025, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following individual are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.

      ( print page 8423)    
Lisa M. Palluconi,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

[FR Doc. 2025-01875 Filed 1-28-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
STATE of Louisiana v. Francis WINCHESTER

NO. 2019-KH-0215

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied. See R.S. 15:571.15.

WEIMER, J., recused.
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 14 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection 

Agency relating to ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards 

for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Mr. KING, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. SMITH, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. SCHATZ, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. CASEY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. REED, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the 

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Oil 

and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, 

Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Ad4 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency relat5 ing to ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 14 IS 

1 for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review’’ 

2 (85 Fed. Reg. 57018 (September 14, 2020)), and such 

3 rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 3:05-cv-02188-M-AH Document 9 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 36
1

The findings and recommendation are dated April 20, 2006, but the court docket shows they

were filed April 27, 2006. This explains why the court has previously referred to the findings and

recommendation as filed on April 20, 2006.

2

After the magistrate judge filed his findings and recommendation, petitioner filed on April

28, 2006 a motion for request leave to file a writ of traverse for exhaustion of state remedies. On

May 3, 2006 he filed a request for dismissal of his habeas petition without prejudice. On May 8,

2006 the court granted petitioner’s motion for request leave to file a writ of traverse for exhaustion

of state remedies. It stated that it would defer a ruling on petitioner’s motion to dismiss until it

considered his traverse. After obtaining extensions to July 14, 2006 to file his traverse and his

objections to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, petitioner filed on July 11, 2006

his writ of traverse for exhaustion of state remedies, and he filed on July 17, 2006 his response to

respondent’s answer and brief. This matter is now ripe for decision.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RODNEY DWAYNE PRESLEY, §

 §

Petitioner, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-2533-D

VS. §

 §

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, § 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, §

Correctional Institutions Division, §

 §

Respondent. §

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the

April 27, 2006 findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge,1 the court concludes that the

findings and conclusions are correct and are therefore adopted.2 In view of this decision, the court

denies petitioner’s May 3, 2006 motion to dismiss. 

Moreover, if petitioner were to return to Texas state court in an attempt to exhaust his

unexhausted claims, a Texas court presented with the claims in a successive habeas petition would

likely find them barred under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07. Although actual innocence

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02533-D Document 17 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 88
- 2 -

may excuse a procedural default in “extraordinary cases,” petitioner cannot meet this burden. See,

e.g., Rios v. Quarterman, 2006 WL 1877094, at *6-*7 (W.D. Tex. July 5, 2006) (magistrate judge

recommendation) (concluding that actual innocence claim did not excuse procedural default where,

inter alia, petitioner voluntarily admitted guilt at trial). Like Rios, petitioner pleaded guilty to the

underlying offense, and the plea was knowing and voluntary in all respects.

Accordingly, this habeas petition is denied, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

July 24, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02533-D Document 17 Filed 07/24/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 89
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.25

             TERMINATION OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENT

         Union Bank of California, N.A. ("BANK"), Overhill Farms, Inc., a Nevada
corporation ("Borrower"), Overhill L.C. Ventures, Inc., a California corporation
("OVERHILL VENTURES"), and Treecon Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
formerly known as Overhill Corporation and Polyphase Corporation ("POLYPHASE"),
hereby agree to terminate each of the following alternative dispute resolution
agreements in its entirety: (i) Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement dated
as of November 24, 1999, entered into by and between Bank and Borrower; (ii)
Alternative Dispute Resolution Agreement dated as of November 24, 1999, entered
into by and between Bank and Overhill Ventures, and (iii) Alternative Dispute
Resolution Agreement dated as of November 24, 1999, entered into by and between
Bank and Polyphase.

         This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute but
one and the same instrument.

Dated as of this 16th day of April, 2003.

                                      OVERHILL FARMS, INC.

                                      By:  /S/ JAMES RUDIS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James Rudis
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                      OVERHILL L.C. VENTURES, INC.

                                      By:  /S/ JAMES RUDIS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James Rudis
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



                    [SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE]




<PAGE>



                                      TREECON RESOURCES, INC.,
                                      formerly known as Overhill Corporation and
                                      Polyphase Corporation

                                      By:  /S/ JAMES RUDIS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James Rudis
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                      UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.

                                      By:  /S/ ALBERT R. JOSEPH
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Albert R. Joseph
                                           Vice President
Willie Lee MCGEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-4107

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Niyke D. ECHAVARRIA, a/k/a Niyke Deangelo Echavarria, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1952

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
T.A., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1358

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,942-01

EX PARTE JASON LEE WILSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR07-00049A IN THE 294TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM VAN ZANDT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to twenty years’

imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant alleges that the Parole Board is wrongly determining when he will be next

reviewed for parole. According to Applicant, after the Parole Board last denied him release to parole

(on April 7, 2020), the Parole Board wrongly set-off his next parole-review date for three years.

Applicant argues that a set-off greater than one year cannot be applied to him because he was

convicted of second-degree felony burglary of a habitation and not first-degree felony burglary of

a habitation. See TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 508.141(g), 508.149(a)(13); 37 TEX. ADMIN. CODE 145.12.
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Retzlaff, 135

S.W.3d 45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is

the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

The trial court shall order the Board of Pardons and Paroles’s Office of the General Counsel

to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the

trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a

hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant’s burglary of a habitation

conviction was for a first or for a second degree felony and whether the Parole Board’s set-off was

proper. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions it deems appropriate.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 9, 2020

Do not publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**TIMOTHY BALDWIN,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 992 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 11th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7822
DWIGHT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VICTOR ABERNATHY, Defendant - Appellee, and GARY DIXON; JAMES B. HUNT, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-94-458) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwight Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Abernathy , No. CA-94-458 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20 and Oct. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CarrAmerica
Realty, L.P. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas A. CarrThomas A. CarrChief Executive Officer (of CarrAmerica Realty Corporation, the General Partner of CarrAmerica Realty, L.P.)March 7, 2005/s/ Stephen E. RiffeeStephen E. RiffeeChief Financial Officer (of CarrAmerica Realty Corporation, the General Partner of CarrAmerica Realty, L.P.)March 7, 2005
Tasha TEELING f/k/a Robert P. Teeling, Appellant, v. GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3707

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000799

28-JAN-2020

10:18 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 21-0338, DA 21-0339 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

A.J.S. AND A.J.S., 

 Youths In Need Of Care. 

ORDER 

 Upon consideration of Mother and Appellant’s Motion To Consolidate 

Cases, and with good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the abovecaptioned cases will be consolidated for purposes of appeal under Cause No. DA 

21-0338. 

 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 20 2021

08/20/2021
AMENDMENT TO SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AGREEMENT



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT OF 
 COMMON STOCK RIGHTS
AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment is entered into as of May 16,
2003, by and between Millipore Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, a New York banking corporation (“AST”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  

	A.	 	On April 16, 1998 the Company entered into a Common Stock Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”). 

  

	B.	 	The Company wishes to amend the Rights Agreement. 

  
 AGREEMENT 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of other consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as
follows: 
  

	1.	 	The Rights Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

  
 Section 1(h) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
  
 The term “Continuing Director” shall mean any member of the Board of Directors of the Company. 
  

	2.	 	Except as expressly modified herein, the Right Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

	3.	 	This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall together constitute one and the same document. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed as of the date first above written: 
  

	 MILLIPORE CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    JEFFREY
RUDIN        


	 Name:
	 	Jeffrey Rudin


  

	 AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST
COMPANY

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    HERBERT J.
LEMMER        


	 Name:
	 	 Herbert J. Lemmer
 Vice President
C.B. v. L.M.

2160966

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 30, 2018

Affirmed.
Ayesha R. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-712

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 6, 2019

Ayesha R. Hill, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.