alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BLACK POINT ASSETS, INC., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A., et al, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-2892

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

F.T. PRATT, III, ID # 05070360, )

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-2033-K

)

LUPE VALDEZ, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the

Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED this 3rd day of January , 2006.

 s/Ed Kinkeade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02033-K Document 10 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 51
Retention Bonus Agrmt- NYCB, Roslyn Bancorp, Roslyn Savings Bank, Joseph Mancino



 EXHIBIT 10.5 
  
 New York Community Bancorp, Inc. 
 615
Merrick Avenue 
 Westbury, New York 11590 
  

June 27, 2003 
  
 Joseph L. Mancino 
 The Roslyn Savings Bank 
 One Jericho Plaza 
 Jericho, New York 11753-8905 
  
 Dear Joseph: 
  
 I am pleased to have this opportunity to set forth in writing certain additional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and New York Community Bank (the “Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered between the Holding
Company and Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the Holding Company. 
  
 At such time as you become an employee of the Holding Company and the Bank under your new employment agreement as a result of the merger contemplated by
the Merger Agreement, you will receive a retention bonus of $2,000,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employment after the Effective Time other than by reason of an “Event of
Termination” (as defined in your new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-day period, you will immediately return to the Holding Company a
portion of the retention bonus equal to the product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period and the denominator of which is 365. 







 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the Merger
Agreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 
  
 Please
acknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 
  

	 	 	 Sincerely,

		
	 	 	 /s/ Joseph R. Ficalora


	 	 	 Joseph R. Ficalora
 President and Chief Executive Officer



  

	 Acknowledged and Agreed:

	
	 /s/ Joseph L. Mancino


	 Joseph L. Mancino


  
  

 2
Marvin L. HAGGINS, a/k/a Marvin Lavan Haggins, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2349

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019

Marvin L. Haggins, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Trametrich JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3730

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 25, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
June 30, 2023 December 31, 2022

Assets

Cash and Cash Equivalents $                    1,509,500 $                       647,500

Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations $            6,706,228,331 $            5,993,782,352

Accrued Interest Receivable $                 33,056,465 $                 33,775,692

Premium Receivable $               308,951,944 $               644,543,000

Other Receivables $                                ‐ $                                ‐  

Operating lease right‐of‐use assets $                       376,422 $                       452,319

General Property, Equipment, and Software,

Total Assets

Net $                               617 $                               881

$            7,050,123,279 $            6,673,201,744

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

Operating lease liabilities $                       381,815 $                       456,859

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses $                       613,903 $                       702,526

Farm Credit Insurance Fund

     Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance $            7,049,127,561 $            6,672,042,359

Allocated Insurance Fund Balance $                                ‐ $                                ‐

Total Insurance Fund $            7,049,127,561 $            6,672,042,359

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund $            7,050,123,279 $            6,673,201,744

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Comparative Statement of Financial Condition

June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022

(Unaudited)

   
Calendar Year to Date Calendar Year to Date

June 30, 2023 June 30, 2022

Income

Premiums $               308,951,944 $               318,152,768

Interest Income on Investments $                 70,376,454 $                 27,577,381

Total Income $               379,328,398 $               345,730,149

Expenses

Administrative Operating Expenses $                   2,243,196 $                   2,232,168

$                   2,243,196 $                   2,232,168

Net Income $               377,085,202 $               343,497,981

Beginning Balance at January 1, 2023 $           6,672,042,359

Payment to AIRAs Accountholders $                                ‐

Net Income $               377,085,202

Ending Balance at June 30, 2023 $           7,049,127,561

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Comparative Statement of Revenue and Expense

Period Ended June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022

(Unaudited)

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund

Period Ended June 30, 2023

(Unaudited)
Kevin Edward YUHAS, DOC #C11931, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4761

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 5, 2019

Howard L. Dimming, II, Public Defender, and Pamela Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Kevin Yuhas, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM JJ., Concur.
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 1 of 9 PageID 439
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 2 of 9 PageID 440
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 3 of 9 PageID 441
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 4 of 9 PageID 442
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 5 of 9 PageID 443
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 6 of 9 PageID 444
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 7 of 9 PageID 445
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 8 of 9 PageID 446
Case 4:05-cv-00345-A Document 73 Filed 10/23/06 Page 9 of 9 PageID 447
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Getting Ready Corporation (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Joel E. Bernstein, M.D., as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David Starr, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: November 12, 2008 By: /s/ Joel E. Bernstein

Joel E. Bernstein, M.D.

President and

Chief Executive Officer Date: November 12, 2008 By: /s/ David Starr

David Starr

Chief Financial Officer This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Keith FRIBERG, Appellant, v. Ryan CRAMSEY, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2834

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 25, 2019]

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BV Financial, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Carolyn M. MrozCarolyn M. MrozPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2006By:

/s/ Edmund T. LeonardEdmund T. LeonardChairman of the Board and Chief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2006
Case 4:17-cr-00024-JST Document 8 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 1
Application of Retail Scanner Data to Calculate Monthly 

Area Price Measures for Foods @ FCSM 2023

What is retail scanner data?

October 24, 2023

Patrick McLaughlin

USDA Economic Research Service

Food Economics Division

The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and should not be

construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. The analysis,

findings, and conclusions expressed in this presentation should not be attributed to Circana.
2

What is scanner data for food? 

• The value, quantity, and characteristics of food purchased by 

consumers at food retailers captured at the point-of-sale

– Retailers often partner with private firms to collect, manage, analyze, 

etc. these data for a variety of clients, including researchers 

• ERS acquires such data from Circana

– Information Resources, Inc. (IRI) and The 

NPD Group have merged to form Circana

– Supports research projects, program 

evaluations, regulatory impact analyses, 

and data products
3

Circana OmniMarket Core Outlets (formerly IRI Infoscan)

• Weekly, item-level sales at either the store-level or aggregate 

store geography

• Sales value and quantities of food sold in retail stores?

– Dollars = total $ value of a food item sold in a week

– Units = quantity sold in terms of (raw) units

– Volume = quantity sold in terms of volume/weight equivalency value

– Can compute a price from these measures (e.g., Dollars/Volume)
4

Circana OmniMarket Core Outlets (formerly IRI Infoscan)

• Weekly, item-level sales data for about 60,000 stores for each 

year

– 6 to 8 billion sales records per year

– 2008 – 2022 acquired and curated by ERS

• Covers about 20% of store locations, 50% of total food sales 

nationwide (Levin et al, 2018)

• Store types include grocery, club, supercenter, convenience, 

dollar, drug, military

• Store information and locations
5

Circana OmniMarket Core Outlets (formerly IRI Infoscan)

• Detailed product information (“the product dictionary”)

– Over 1 million food items per year with key characteristics

– Key characteristics such as brand, size/weight, categorization, type, 

flavor, nutrition facts panel, etc. 
6

For more information

• Using Proprietary Data on the ERS website

• Technical bulletins

– Understanding IRI Household-Based and Store-Based Scanner Data (TB-1942) 

by Mary Muth (RTI) and others

– Food-at-Home Expenditures: Comparing Commercial Household Scanner Data 

From IRI and Government Survey Data (TB-1946)

– Examining Food Store Scanner Data: A Comparison of the IRI InfoScan Data 

with Other Data Sets, 2008–2012 (TB-1949)
Benjamin J. FREDERICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2084

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 4 

REDACTED 

PUBLIC VERSION

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 256-9 Filed 01/04/19 Page 1 of 4
Exhibit 7 

To Declaration of Kevin H. Moriarty in Support of 

Motion by the Federal Trade Commission to 

Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Patrick Schaumont

Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 256-9 Filed 01/04/19 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 256-9 Filed 01/04/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:17-cv-00039-JD Document 256-9 Filed 01/04/19 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we,
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Manitex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                                             
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ David J. Langevin                                       
|Name:  |  | David J. Langevin                                           
|Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                        
|       |  | (Principal Executive Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)

Dated: August 13, 2009



|       |  |                                                                            
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ David H. Gransee                                                       
|Name:  |  | David H. Gransee                                                           
|Title: |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                 
|       |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Manitex International, Inc.)

Dated: August 13, 2009



45
Kacie Magee BREEN v. Jeanie Candrew HOLMES, Kimberly Jo Graham, "Mandevillenative," Amanda Terrell, "Blonde4u," "Breen Team," Jenafer Mulkey Sheridan, Toni "Whodat" Hawkins, Nikki Costanza, Desiree Waguespack Maestri, "Wearsinkingfast," Sheldon Fleming, and Dianne Arndt

NO. 2018-C-0049

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 2018

Denied.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
# C_2017424EN.01002001.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 11 September 2017 — Anja Oehlke, Wolfgang Oehlke v TUIfly GmbH

(Case C-533/17)

(2017/C 424/29)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Anja Oehlke, Wolfgang Oehlke

Applicants:

Defendant: TUIfly GmbH

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004, (1) read in the light of recital 15, to be interpreted as meaning that an operating air carrier can be exempted from its obligation to pay compensation solely on the basis of such extraordinary circumstances that first occurred on the day of the flight, or can extraordinary circumstances that already occurred on the previous day justify the cancellation or long delay of a flight on the following day? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004, (1) read in the light of recital 15, to be interpreted as meaning that an operating air carrier can be exempted from its obligation to pay compensation solely on the basis of such extraordinary circumstances that first occurred on the day of the flight, or can extraordinary circumstances that already occurred on the previous day justify the cancellation or long delay of a flight on the following day?

1

| 2. | If extraordinary circumstances that already occurred on the previous day can also justify the cancellation or long delay of a flight on the following day, is Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 to be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier is required, as part of the reasonable measures which it must take in order to avoid extraordinary circumstances, to make adequate provision for such contingencies in advance and, in any event, also adequately provide replacement aircraft at its home base? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If extraordinary circumstances that already occurred on the previous day can also justify the cancellation or long delay of a flight on the following day, is Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 to be interpreted as meaning that an air carrier is required, as part of the reasonable measures which it must take in order to avoid extraordinary circumstances, to make adequate provision for such contingencies in advance and, in any event, also adequately provide replacement aircraft at its home base?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91; OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,037
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,820
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     85,077
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,849
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,725
<LOANS>                                         95,928
<ALLOWANCE>                                        283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,764
<DEPOSITS>                                     122,983
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,113
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                897
<LONG-TERM>                                     63,136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           836
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 200,764
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,449
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,929
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   232
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,610
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,682
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,112
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,498
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   7
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    808
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         808
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.99
<LOANS-NON>                                        643
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   233
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  283
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               283
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>