alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 27, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10568

Summary Calendar

JAMES H. WILSON, SR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-00716-A

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Wilson’s case without prej.udice for Wilson’s failure

to follow the court’s order. See Callip v. Harris County Child

Welfare Dept., 757 F.2d 1513, 1518-19 (5th Cir. 1985); Rogers v.

Kroger Co., 669 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1982).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOHN DAVID SHOCKLEY, §

Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-0223-K

v. §

§

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS §

MEDICAL §

BRANCH, et al., §

Defendants. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,

Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any

objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District

Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are

correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. 

Defendants Valdez and McMillan’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on December

23, 2008, is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Shockley’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants [sic] Motion

for Summary Judgment received on January 27, 2009, is DENIED. Defendant’s

Objections filed on February 17, 2009, are hereby OVERRULED. 

SO ORDERED.

Signed this 9 day of March, 2009. th

_________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Demonstration of Census Coverage Measurement Clerical Matching Software

Tamara Adams, Susanne Johnson, Lee Goldberg, and Paul Clemm (U.S. Census 

Bureau) 

As part of the 2010 Census, the U.S. Census Bureau and Gunnison Consulting Group, 

Inc. have developed a series of clerical matching software packages to conduct 

computer-assisted clerical matching of both addresses and persons between the 

census and the independent enumeration as part of the Census Coverage 

Measurement. These systems include functionality to allow clerical matchers to review 

records with the results of computer matching, filter records, conduct duplicate searches 

throughout the country, link and unlink records, and view other details about each 

record. In addition, each system includes a quality assurance component for a 

dependent review of each unit of work by a higher-level clerical matcher to ensure a 

prespecified outgoing quality level. These systems, based on the 2000 coverage 

measurement matching systems, have been further developed and expanded to 

accommodate our program’s current goals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

NO. 01

- 14

- 00463

- CV

In re Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, Rodolfo L. Garcia,

and Brandon C. Stroh

and

NO. 01

- 14

- 00467

- CV

Houston Progressive Radiology Associates, PLLC, et al.

v.

Stephen B. Lee, M.D., P.A. et al.

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Please take notice that effective Thursday June 25 , 2015, the suite number for

Brian M. Keller, State Bar No. 00784376, has changed and he r equests that service of

notices and all other documents be made upon him at:

K ELLER & A SSOCIATES

, P.C.

2500 West Loop South, Suite 308

Houston, TX 77027

281.853.9456 P hone

713.600.5804 F acsimile

bkeller@kellerattorneys.com ACCEPTED

01-14-00463-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

6/26/2015 9:29:31 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 Respectfully submitted,

K ELLER & A SSOCIATES

, P.C.

By: /s/ Brian M. Keller

Brian M. Keller

State Bar No. 00784376

2500 West Loop South, Suite 300

Houston, TX 77027

281.853.9456 P hone

713.600.5804 F acsimile

bkeller@ke llerattorneys.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been forwarded to

all counsel of record June 26 , 2015

.

Via E

- Filing:

Mr. Jeffrey Potts

Mr. Larry Veselka

Mr. Jarod Stewart

Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, L.L.P.

700 Louisiana, Suite 2300

Houston, Texas 77002

jpotts@skv.com

lveselka@skv.com

jstewart@skv.com Via E

- Filing:

Patrick R. Cowlishaw

Jackson Walker L.L.P.

901 Main Street, Suite 6000

Dallas, Texas 75202

pcowlishaw@jw.com

Via E

- Filing:

Mr. Paul D. Clote

Law Office of Paul D. Clote

Four Houston Center

1221 Lamar St., Suite 1090

Houston, Texas 77010

- 3038 Via E

- Filing:

Fields Alexander

Beck Redden LLP

1221 McKinney Street, St e

. 4500

Houston, Texas 77010

falexander@beckredden.com

/s/ Brian M. Keller

Brian M. Keller
Ronald L. KEENER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-89

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 9, 2019 Rehearing Denied May 3, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverbend Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Leon Nowalsky, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Leon Nowalsky                   Leon NowalskyTreasurer and Principal Accounting OfficerDate:  June 14, 2005This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Rodney MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-558

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 8, 2019 Rehearing Denied April 11, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Champps Entertainment, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 3, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2005 (the Report), I, David D. Womack, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: September 6, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David D. Womack                                                                             
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | David D. Womack                                                                                 
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
D.E. v. RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160926

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 9, 2018

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


            P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
                          PFCCB Club - Frankford, Inc.
                          PF Chang's III, LLC
                          PFC Building III Limited Partnership
                          PFCCB Marlton LLC
                          PFCCB Licensing, Inc.
                          PFCCB Administration, Inc.
                          PFCCB Equipment LLC
                          The Arbors Club, Inc.
                          PFCCB Florida Joint Venture
                          PFCCB Halpern LLC
                          PFCCB Loutex Joint Venture
                          PFCCB Mid-Atlantic LLC
                          PFCCB Midwest LLC
                          PFCCB NewTex Joint Venture
                          PFCCB Northwest LLC
                          PFCCB NUCA LLC
                          PFCCB SoCal LLC
                          PFCCB SoCal II LLC
                          PFCCB Southeastern LLC
                          PFCCB Midwest (2003) LLC
                          PFCCB NUCA (2003) LLC
                          Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc.
                          Pei Wei Asian Diner One LLC
                          Pei Wei Asian Diner Two (Dallas) LLP
                          Pei Wei Asian Diner Three (SoCal) LLP
                          PWAD Texas, Inc.
                          PWAD Hebron Club, Inc.
                          Pei Wei Houston, Inc.
                          Pei Wei Asian Diner Four (Houston) LLP
                          Pei Wei Asian Diner Five (Denver) LLP
Order filed January 22, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00729-CV

____________

IN THE MATTER OF J.A.A., JR.

On Appeal from County Court at Law #4

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-CJV-023528

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from an order entered under section 54.02 of the 

Texas Family Code respecting transfer of the child for prosecution as an adult. 

Appellant’s brief was due January 21, 2021. No brief has been filed. 

Appeals in juvenile certification cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

This accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. 

Therefore we order appellant’s appointed counsel, Elan Levy, to file 

appellant’s brief no later than February 1, 2021. If the brief is not filed by that date, 

counsel may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of 
2

court. In addition, the court may require appointment of new counsel due to the 

failure to timely file appellant’s brief. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Wilson.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**805 CA 14-02145**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH MASCIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITIES AS TENANT MEMBER OF BUFFALO MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND CANDIDATE FOR REELECTION AS A TENANT MEMBER OF BUFFALO MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF BUFFALO/NIAGARA, INC., RESPONDENT, BUFFALO MUNICIPAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

KAVINOKY COOK LLP, BUFFALO (LAURENCE K. RUBIN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

JOSEPH G. MAKOWSKI, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Shirley Troutman, J.), entered June 25, 2014 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment, among other things, directed respondents to reinstate petitioner as a candidate for reelection to the position of Tenant Member.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 19, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of China  Health  Holding,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter  ended June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Julianna  Lu, Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


August 18, 2006


                                     /s/ Julianna Lu
                                     -----------------
                                     Julianna Lu
                                     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                     Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL

 Case No. 2:15−cv−03063−DSF−AGR Date 9/2/2015 

 Title RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ V. TIGRAN GUMUSHYAN ET AL 

 Present: The Honorable DALE S. FISCHER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT

JUDGE 

 Debra Plato Not Present 

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL

 FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

 Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice

if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the

complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the

complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States).

Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a)(1).

 In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not

been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show

cause in writing on or before Monday, September 14, 2015, why this action should

not be dismissed as to the applicable defendant(s) for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to

Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is

appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will

stand submitted on that date.

 Filing of the following on or before the date indicated above will constitute a

satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause:

 XX Proofs of service of summons and complaint on all defendants for whom

 such documents have not yet been filed;

 An appearance by all defendants who have been served or an application

 for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

 Procedure;

 A request that the clerk enter default judgment or motion for entry of

 default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

 Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 Initials of Deputy Clerk: dp 

CV−90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES−GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Case 3:16-cv-07236-LB Document 28 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Maysville Marketsquare Associates, L.P.
North Coast Health Center (JV Partnership)
Pan Pacific (Cable Park), LLC
Pan Pacific (Clackamas), Inc.
Pan Pacific (Clackamas), LLC
Pan Pacific (Marina Village), LLC
Pan Pacific (Portland), LLC
Pan Pacific (Rancho Las Palmas), LLC
Pan Pacific (RLP), Inc.
Pan Pacific (Sunset Mall), LLC
Pan Pacific Development (Chino), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Kentucky), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (New Mexico), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Olympia Square), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Rosewood), Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee) Acquisition, Inc.
Pan Pacific Development (Tennessee), L.P.
Pan Pacific U.S. Shopping Center I, LP
Sahara Pavilion North U.S., Inc.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July

2, 2019.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00481- CV

IN RE CORPORATE NECESSITIES, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 125th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-07549



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 14, 2019, relator Corporate Necessities, Inc. filed a petition for writ
of mandamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Kyle2

Carter, presiding judge of the 125th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his April 9, 2019 and May 21, 2019 orders compelling arb itration.
Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s motion for temporary relief.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Bourliot , and Zimmerer.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 26, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 26, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24A1539. MT. OLIVE HOMES & REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. 

CAMERON LAMAR STRICKLAND.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On June 13, 2024, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a

brief no later than June 24, 2024. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of

errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is

hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
# C_2017309EN.01002602.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto (Italy) lodged on 8 June 2017 — Memoria Srl, Antonia Dall’Antonia v Comune di Padova

(Case C-342/17)

(2017/C 309/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Memoria Srl, Antonia Dall’Antonia

Applicants:

Defendant: Comune di Padova

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as precluding the application of the following provisions of Article 52 of the Regulation on funeral services of the Municipality of Padua?

‘The recipient shall not in any circumstances be permitted to request a third party to keep the funeral urn. This prohibition shall apply even if the deceased expressly stated during his lifetime that such was his wish (third subparagraph).

It is obligatory to keep the urn solely at the home of the recipient (fourth subparagraph) ...

In no circumstances may funeral urns be kept for profit and economic activities relating to, even non-exclusively, the keeping of funeral urns, for whatever purpose and for whatever period, shall therefore not be permitted. This prohibition shall apply even if the deceased expressly stated during his lifetime that such was his wish (tenth subparagraph).’

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP

333 SOUTH

GRAND

AVENUE

SUITE 2100

LOS

ANGELES, CA 90071

DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP

Lukas Sosnicki (SBN 295895)

lsosnicki@dykema.com

Dawn N. Williams (SBN 267925)

dwilliams@dykema.com

333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Telephone: (213) 457-1800

Facsimile: (213) 457-1850

Attorneys for Defendant

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARUN RASHEED CHARLIE,

Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; AND

DOES 1-50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:16-cv-07409-HSG

Hon. Haywood S. Gillian, Jr.

STIPULATION FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH

LEAVE TO REINSTATE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff Harun Rasheed Charlie

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), (collectively, the

“Parties”), by and through their attorneys, hereby enter into this Stipulation to dismiss

the above-captioned action without prejudice. This dismissal shall be without

prejudice and with leave to reinstate until May 1, 2017, if fully executed settlement

documents are not obtained by that time. If this action is not reinstated on or before

May 1, 2017, this dismissal shall be converted to a dismissal with prejudice. Each

party agrees to bear its or his own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees.

Case 4:16-cv-07409-HSG Document 16 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP

333 SOUTH

GRAND

AVENUE

SUITE 2100

LOS

ANGELES, CA 90071

STIPULATED AND AGREED TO:

KETTNER LAW CORPORATION

By:/s/ Marc Applbaum

Marc Applbaum

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HARUN RASHEED CHARLIE

E-mail: marc@kettnerlaw.com

DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP

By:/s/ Dawn N. Williams

Lukas Sosnicki

Dawn N. Williams

Attorneys for Defendant

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

E-mail: lsosnicki@dykema.com

dwilliams@dykema.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Haywood S. William Jr. 

DATED: 3/27/2017

Case 4:16-cv-07409-HSG Document 16 Filed 03/27/17 Page 2 of 2