alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ensuring Scientific Integrity (SI) 

in the Federal Statistical System: 

Implementing the New Guidelines at the 

Census Bureau

Monique E. Eleby, Chief, Policy Coordination Office

and Chief Privacy Officer

U.S. Census Bureau

FCSM October 2023

For Internal Use Only
Agenda

• Department of Commerce (Commerce) SI Policy Status

• Census Bureau SI Policy Status

• Census Bureau SI Policy Key Points

• Updates to Other Census Bureau Policies

2

For Internal Use Only
Commerce SI Policy Status

• Presidential Memorandum on Restoring Trust in Government Through Scientific 

Integrity and Evidence-Based Policymaking (January 27, 2021) requires agencies to develop an SI Policy.

• National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) provided further guidance in 

their report, A Framework for Federal Scientific Integrity Policy and Practice (January 2023), including a model policy

• Commerce is in the final review and approval process for a Department 

Administrative Order (DAO) on Scientific Integrity

• The DAO was drafted by a cross-bureau working group with members from NOAA, NIST, BEA, Census Bureau, & the Commerce Chief Evaluation Officer who 

utilized the model and feedback from the White House Office of Science and 

Technology Policy (OSTP)

• OSTP will compile and make public all agency policies including designated Chief 

Science Officers and Scientific Integrity Officers on a Federal webpage 

For Internal Use Only 3
Census Bureau SI Policy Status

• Commerce’s draft policy allows scientific integrity concerns to be 

addressed by applicable bureau-level policy unless:

• A bureau does not have a scientific integrity policy, or 

• The scientific integrity concern is at the Department level in which case it will 

be addressed by the DOC policy

• Census Bureau’s SI policy will align with the NSTC model policy and 

Commerce’s policy

For Internal Use Only 4
Census Bureau SI Policy Key Points 

• Preserve existing processes 

• Monitoring for and investigating allegations of interviewer falsification

• Data breaches

• Define a formal process for other SI allegations

5 For Internal Use Only
Updates to Other Census Bureau Policies

Statistical Quality Standards

• Census Bureau’s information quality guidelines

Data Stewardship Policy on Transparency in Secondary Research

• Establishes the Census Bureau’s commitment to being transparent in the conduct of 

its mission, specifically regarding secondary research using survey and administrative 

or third-party data, while meeting its statutory and ethical obligations to protect respondent privacy, confidentiality, and information and systems security 

Clearance and Release of Public Information Materials

• Needs updates to explicitly forbid censorship, unreasonable delay, and suppression of objective communication of data and results without scientific justification as 

recommended by the model SI policy 

6 For Internal Use Only
Thank You!

Contact information:

Monique E. Eleby

Chief, Policy Coordination Office and Chief Privacy Officer

U.S. Census Bureau

Email: Monique.e.eleby@census.gov

7 For Internal Use Only
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Two Rivers Water Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John McKowen Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:  August 8, 2012
By: /s/ John McKowenChief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Language Line Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(iii) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(iv) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Language Line Holdings, Inc.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009                    
|                                     
|/s/ Michael F. Schmidt               
|Michael F.Schmidt                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of this Report.
Joseph FARRELL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Gordon FLACH, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0834

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

IN RE:

ACCIDENT AND INJURY PAIN

CENTERS, INC., ET AL.,

 Debtors.

--------------------------------------------------------

ACCIDENT AND INJURY PAIN

CENTERS, INC., ET AL.,

Appellants,

VS.

ADRIAN L. CRANE and LAW OFFICES

OF ADRIAN L. CRANE &

ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

Appellees.

)

) BANKRUPTCY CASE NO.

)

) 05-31688-HDH-11

)

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

) 3:05-CV-2510-G

)

) ECF

)

)

)

)

)

ORDER

Before the court is the motion of the defendants, Adrian L. Crane and Law

Offices of Adrian L. Crane & Associates, P.C., to withdraw order of reference to the

bankruptcy court in Adversary Proceeding No. 05-03680 pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02510-N Document 7 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 39
* Section 157(d) provides, in pertinent part: “The district court may

withdraw, in whole or in part, any case or proceeding referred under this section, on

its own motion or on timely motion of any party, for cause shown.”

- 2 -

§ 157(d)*

. Responding to the motion, on January 12, 2006, Judge Harlin D. Hale of

the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a

report and recommendation to the district court on the motion to withdraw

reference.

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant

to the issues raised, the bankruptcy court’s report, including the recommendations

contained in ¶ 6, is ADOPTED and made a part of this order by specific reference.

SO ORDERED.

January 17, 2006.

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02510-N Document 7 Filed 01/17/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 40
EXHIBIT 32.1




        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific
Northwest Productions Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Deljit Bains,
Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.

                               PACIFIC NORTHWEST PRODUCTIONS INC.

Date:  August 13, 2005          /s/ Deljit Bains
                              ----------------------------------------
                             By: Deljit Bains, President and Chief
                                 Executive Officer
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Allied Security Holdings LLC (the"Company") for the quarter ended September30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), William C.Whitmore, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and WilliamA. Torzolini, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ William C. Whitmore,Jr.Name:    William C. Whitmore,Jr.Title:   President and Chief ExecutiveOfficerDate:   November 14, 2005

/s/William A. Torzolini Name:   William A.TorzoliniTitle:   Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficerDate:   November 14,2005

----
Case 3:06-cr-00044-N Document 21 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 41
Gerson JUAREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1715

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

A.D.H., :

Petitioner :

:

v. :

:

Pe nnsylvania State Police, :

Respondent : No. 315 M.D. 2022

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, July 2 , 2024

, upon consideration of P etitioner’s

application for re consideration , the application is DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6390

CHARLIE WARD, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STEPHEN DEWALT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-00-856)

Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 29, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie Ward, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charlie Ward, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. We note that, even if the district court had jurisdiction

to review Ward’s Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),

claim, the sentence would not be in error because his 188-month

sentence did not exceed the applicable statutory maximum. See 21

U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West 1999); United States v. Kinter, 235

F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Ward v. Dewalt, No. CA-00-856

(E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 22, 2001; entered Jan. 23, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.1



                         HJ & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
              CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND CONSULTANTS
           American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
            Utah Association of Certified Public Accountants





                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'
                    --------------------------------



Board of Directors and Shareholders
Starnet Communications International Inc.


We hereby consent to the use of our audit report dated July 22, 2000 in
this Form 10K of Starnet Communications International Inc. for the year
ended April 30, 2000, which is part of this Form 10K and all references to
our firm included in this Form 10K.


/s/ HJ & ASSOCIATES, LLC

HJ & Associates, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
July 28, 2000














                    50 South Main Street, Suite 1450
                       Salt Lake City, Utah 84144
            Telephone (801) 328-4408 Facsimile (801) 328-4461
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-25   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 2

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-25   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 2
Jimmie Lee CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3156

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
David GUZMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 25, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Britten STEINER v. Russell STEINER

2170326

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 23, 2018

Dismissed.
#### Arthur Agustin SERVITO; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-71268.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2004.*

Decided April 27, 2004.

Cora M. Avinante, Honolulu, HI, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Honolulu, HI, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Esq., Michael J. Dougherty, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*508MEMORANDUM **

Arthur Agustín Servito and his children, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s denial of Servito’s application for waiver of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(H).

We dismiss the petition because we lack jurisdiction to review the purely discretionary decision whether Servito is eligible for waiver of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii); *Spencer Enters., Inc. v. United States,*345 F.3d 683, 689-90 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that section 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) bars judicial review over decisions statutorily delegated to the pure discretion of the Attorney General).

Petitioners’ contention that the BIA’s streamlined decision failed to offer a reasoned explanation is foreclosed by *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 850-51 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 24, 2025.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 14, 2025, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 1305 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-1130, K2025-1130.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2025-01641 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

DONALD ROGER BURR, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

VS. § NO. 3-05-CV-1539-D 

§

BILL HILL, ET AL., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

After conducting a review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the findings

and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge are

correct, and they are hereby adopted as the findings of the court. 

Accordingly, plaintiff is permitted to prosecute his excessive force claim against Grand

Prairie Detention Officers McDonald, Rodriguez, and Woodside, and the clerk of court is directed

to issue summonses to these defendants, to be served by the marshal. All other claims are

summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) final judgment

filed today.

SO ORDERED.

October 18, 2005.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01539-D-BD Document 25 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 184
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements



|1. | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-128135) of V.I. Technologies, Inc.,
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-124894) of V.I. Technologies, Inc.,
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-123997) of V.I. Technologies, Inc.,
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-123781) of V.I. Technologies, Inc.,
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124089) of V.I. Technologies, Inc.,Supplemental Equity Compensation Plan
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly V.I. Technologies, Inc., and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 16, 2005, with respect to the 2004 and
2003 financial statements of Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia

March 13, 2006
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: July 28, 2010 /s/ Cosmo Palmieri Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

JOHN DAVID SHOCKLEY, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§ Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-0223-K

v. §

§

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL §

BRANCH, et al., §

§

Defendants. § 

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this

case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the of the United States

Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and are adopted as the Findings

and Conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation

of the United States Magistrate Judge are adopted. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant

Oliver in his official capacity are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, and Plaintiff’s

claims against Defendant Oliver in an individual capacity are DISMISSED with

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Signed this 9 day of October, 2007.

th

____________________________________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EX PARTE MARSHALL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

(In re: J.V. v. Marshall County Department of Human Resources)

2170056

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 16, 2017

Dismissed.
Shameil SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 24, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 16, 2019

Shameil Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
Marco DEJESUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-1965

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 16, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.