alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AHMAD DEHAVEN BURWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (5:10-cr-00064-BR-1; 5:13-cv-00475-BR)

Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmad Dehaven Burwell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, Shailika 

K. Shah, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ahmad Dehaven Burwell seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012)

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Burwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE of Louisiana v. Kentreal Jarbar HOWARD

2018-KO-1650

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 2019

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE**

Writ denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.

CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

Crichton, J., would grant in part and docket.

I would grant in part and docket to examine the defendant's claim of insufficiency of evidence for the fourth felony offender adjudication and his resulting 30 year hard labor sentence.
Rodrecius A. HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3433

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General; and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Michael SUMNER, DOC #H00468, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1757

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Johnny JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3749

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 28, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.:


         We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-63319, 333-63743, 333-72551, 333-37564 and 333-51230, each on Form S-3 of
Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and to incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-61169 and 333-51384 on Form S-8 of Pan Pacific
Retail Properties, Inc., of our report dated February 9, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and the related Schedule III,
which report appears in the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Pan
Pacific Retail Properties, Inc.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


San Diego, California
March 22, 2001
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EL PASO COUNTY WATER 

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, 

 Appellant,

v.

COMANCHE TRAIL PIPELINE, LLC,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00231-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2016DCV0255)

O R D E R

This Court has received and filed Appellant’s response to this Court’s order regarding the 

notice of removal. Because the notice of removal was filed with the trial court clerk on October 

13, 2016, this Court, pursuant to 28 USCA §1446(d), “shall proceed no further unless and until 

the case is remanded.” The parties are further notified that the appeal has been abated and 

removed from this Court’s docket.

Accordingly, the appeal is abated.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of October, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2110

MICHAEL WAYNE HILL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MICHAEL WAYNE REVELLS , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. ( 4:20

- cv - 00233

- FL )

Submitted : December 16, 2021 Decided: December 17, 2021

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges , and KEENAN , Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael Wayne Hill , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Wayne Hi ll appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment
motion for order of regress . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Revells , No.
4:20

- cv - 00233

- FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 2021) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ING Groep N.V., a public limited company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 16, 2015



/s/ R. HamersName:

Ralph HamersTitle:

Chairman of the Executive Board(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ING Groep N.V. and will be retained by ING Groep
N.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request.
(LOGO) 460 Briarwood Dr., Suite 415
       Jackson, MS 39206

       P. O. Box 12830
       Jackson, MS 39236-2830                                   (601) 899-1500
                                                           FAX: (601) 899-1502



March 30, 1998

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

Re:      Officer's Certificate

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1997 fiscal year:

(A)      I have reviewed the activities and  performance of the Servicer  during
         the preceding fiscal year under the terms of the  Servicing Agreement
         and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide  and  to the  best  of  these  officers'
         knowledge,   the   Servicer   has  fulfilled all of its duties,
         responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
         year,  or if there has been a default  or failure  of the  servicer  to
         perform  any  of  such  duties,   responsibilities  or  obligations,  a
         description  of each  default  or  failure  and the  nature  and status
         thereof has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;
(B)      I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an approved FNMA
         servicer in good  standing;
(C)      I have  confirmed  that the Fidelity  Bond,  the Errors and Omission
         Insurance Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the
         Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;
(D)      All premiums for each Hazard Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy
         and  Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy  are  with  respect  to  each
         Mortgaged Property,  has been paid and that all such insurance policies
         are in full force and effect;
(E)      All real estate taxes,  governmental assessments and any other expenses
         accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance
         on any  Mortgaged  Property,  has been  paid,  or if any such  costs or
         expenses have not been paid to any Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for
         the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;
(F)      All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded;
         and
(G)      All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgage  Property
         required per section 6050H,  6050J,  and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue
         Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:
/s/Paul J. Salvo
Officer

President
Title

3/30/98
Date



          JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI - ATLANTA, GEORGIA - CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
                   Member of the Mortgage Bankers Association
ROBOCOM SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC.                                 EXHIBIT 10.14

September 19, 2000

Robocom Systems International Inc.
511 Ocean Avenue
Massapequa, New York 11758

Attention: C. Kenneth Morrelly
           President & Chief Executive Officer

Gentlemen/Ladies:

      I, Irwin Balaban, hereby confirm that I hold, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in this letter, available to Robocom Systems International
Inc. (the "Company"), a $500,000 unsecured line of credit.

      Each advance under this line of credit shall be evidenced by, shall be
payable as provided in, and shall bear interest at the rate specified in, a
promissory note of the Company in the form included with this letter.

      This line of credit shall be held available until September 19, 2001.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        By: /s/ Irwin Balaban
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Irwin Balaban
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 25 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the lying in state 

of the remains of the Honorable Harry Mason Reid, Jr., a Senator 

from the State of Nevada. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 5, 2022 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. MCCONNELL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for the 

lying in state of the remains of the Honorable Harry 

Mason Reid, Jr., a Senator from the State of Nevada. 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That in recognition of the long and distin3 guished service rendered to the Nation by Harry Mason 

4 Reid, Jr., a Senator from the State of Nevada, his remains 

5 be permitted to lie in state in the rotunda of the Capitol 

6 on Wednesday, January 12, 2022, and the Architect of 

7 the Capitol, under the direction of the President pro tem8 pore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of RepVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:04 Jan 06, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SC25.ATS SC25

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 25 ATS 

1 resentatives, shall take all necessary steps for the accom2 plishment of that purpose. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Frederick CRITTON, Jr., DOC #249426, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2924

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 15, 2019.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
C.G., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2109

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:00-cv-00815-M Document 98 Filed 03/07/03 Page 1 of 1 PageID 597
# C_2017213EN.01001701.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 6 March 2017 — Angela Irmgard Diedrich and Others v Société Air France SA

(Case C-112/17)

(2017/C 213/20)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Angela Irmgard Diedrich, Thorsten Diedrich, Angel Wendy Mara Diedrich

Applicants:

Defendant: Société Air France SA

Defendant:

The case was removed from the register of the Court by order of the Court of 6 April 2017.

---
| Company                                                    |  | State                / Province of Incorporation |  | Date                of Incorporation |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--|--------------------------------------------------|--|--------------------------------------|
|                                                            |  |                                                  |  |                                      |
| Organic                Recycling Technologies (China) Inc. |  | China,                Guangdong                  |  | February                14, 2006     |
| Organic                Recycling Technologies, Ltd.        |  | British                Columbia                  |  | June                20, 2003         |
| Organic                Recycling Management, Inc.          |  | British                Columbia                  |  | June                20, 2003         |
| Duro                Enzyme Solutions Inc.                  |  | Canadian                Corporation              |  | August                10, 2000       |
| EASI                Studio Inc.                            |  | British                Columbia, Canada          |  | June                20, 2003         |
| SuperNet                Computing Inc.                     |  | British                Columbia, Canada          |  | June                20, 2003         |
| EASI                Games Inc.                             |  | British                Columbia, Canada          |  | June                20, 2003         |
| EASI                Education Inc.                         |  | Alberta,                Canada                   |  | May                30, 2003          |
| EASI                Movies, Music TV Inc.                  |  | British                Columbia, Canada          |  | June                20, 2003         |
| EAPI                Center Inc.                            |  | Manitoba,                Canada                  |  | September                5, 2003     |
Nathan HERRING, Appellant, v. Alfred O. BONATI, M.D., Gulf Coast Orthopedic Center- Alfred O. Bonati, M.D., P.A.; Medical Development Corporation of Pasco County d/b/a The Bonati Institute; American Medical Care, Inc. ; and Maureen D'Errico, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-4100

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 27, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7570
KEENAN M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES FARRIOR, personally and in his official capacity; FREDY WHEELER, personally and in his official capacity; DARYL HOOKS, personally and in his official capacity; JEFF GEORGE, personally and in his official capacity; CHRISTINA BARGLOFF, personally and in her official capacity; J. NORWOOD, personally and in his official capacity; JOSEPH BROOKS, personally and in his official capacity, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees, and FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - PETERSBURG; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-519-1) Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 24, 2005- 2 - Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keenan M. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Keenan M. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Williams’ action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Farrior , No. CA-03-519-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<P ALIGN="RIGHT">Exhibit 10.6</P>

<P>April 15, 2003</P>

<P>To: Talat Hasan</P>
<P>From: Boris Lipkin</P>
<P>Re: Employment  Contract</P>
<P>CC: Ray Christie, Noel Simmons</P>

<P> </P>
<P>The following is a summary of the closure of your employment contract. Please
signify your agreement by signing below.</P>

<OL>

<LI>You will be resigning as an employee on Friday, April 25.</LI>
<LI>You will remain on the Board of Directors.</LI>
<LI>You will receive regular benefits until the end of April 2003.</LI>
<LI>You will receive Severance Pay in the amount of $225,000, 1/2 of which will be
paid to you in July, and the remaining 1/2 will be paid to you on regular payroll
intervals from April 26 through October 31, 2003.</LI>
<LI>Upon your application for benefits under COBRA, Therma-Wave will pay your
COBRA payments from May 1, 2003 through April 30, 2004. (Our medical plans
require that you be an active employee to remain on the employee rolls).</LI>
<LI>Your stock options will continue to vest until April 30, 2004.</LI></OL>


<P> </P>
<U><P>/s/	Boris Lipkin	</U>      <U>/s/	Talat Hasan	</P>
</U><P>Boris Lipkin         Talat Hasan</P>

<U><P> 	4/15/03	</U>         <U>	4/15/03	</P>
</U><P>Date          Date</P>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.18

["****" indicates material omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission Pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.]

                                                                         V Vitex

April 21, 1999

Mr. Ed Gdula
Bayer Corporation
400 Morgan Lane
West Haven, CT  06516

Dear Ed:

The purpose of this letter is to confirm that additional fractionation capacity
will be made available by VITEX and accepted by Bayer Corporation for calendar
year 2000.  It is anticipated that VITEX will be able to process up to ****
additional liters of Bayer Input (as defined in the Agreement between VITEX and
Bayer executed January 24th, 1996) for a total of **** liters processed by VITEX
in 2000.  Bayer agrees to accept all VITEX capacity available in 2000 up to ****
liters.

Bayer and VITEX agree that the terms and conditions of the Agreement between
Bayer and VITEX entered into on January 24th, 1996 and amended December 22, 1997
will apply to the incremental processing capacity referenced above.

Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.

Please indicate your acceptance of the above by having the appropriate person
sign below and returning one copy of this letter to me.

Sincerely,

/s/ John R. Barr
John R. Barr
President and CEO

Name: Jan Turek   /s/ Jan Turek
     ---------------------------
Date: May 3, 1999
      --------------------------
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00387-CV

JOHN MARGETIS,

Appellant

v.

NANCY PETTERSON 

AND RUPERT KEEPING,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 78461

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of this Court notified the parties in a June 5, 2014 letter that the 

appellant’s brief was overdue in this cause and that the appeal may be dismissed if a 

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal was not filed within twenty-one 

days. No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Margetis v. Petterson Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 17, 2014

[CV06]
Noah WORTHINGTON, DOC #H52397, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-894

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.