2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 4-2-2009 

# F elic i a P e arson v

. C omm S o c i al S ec urity P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 08-3760

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " F e l ic i a P e ar s on v

. C omm S oc i al S e c ur ity " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1591. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/15911 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 08- 3760

____________ F E L I CI A P E AR S ON,

A ppel l ant v . CO M M I SS I ON ER O F S OC I AL SECU RI TY

____________ APP EAL F ROM THE UNI TE D ST ATE S DI S TRI CT C OURT

FOR TH E DI STRI CT O F NEW J ERSEY ( D . C . C i v. N o. 2- 07- cv- 05581) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e W i l l i am J. M ar t i ni

____________ Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL . A . R . 34. 1( a)

M ar ch 3, 2009 B efor e: B A R R Y , W E I S and R O T H , C i r cui tJ udges

( Fi l ed: A pr i l 2, 2009)

____________ OP I NI ON W E I S, C i r cui tJ udge.

T h e c laim a n t in th is c a se f iled a n a p p lica tio n f

o r d isa b ili typ a ym e n ts in 2 0 0 4 . A t th a t ti m e , sh e h a d im p a ire d v isio n . S h e su b se q u e n tlyu n d e rw e n t o p e ra tio n s to r emove cat ar act s fr om bot h ey es and now has aver age vi s i on. She al s o cont ends t hats he s u f f e rs f ro m a s th m a , v a ri o u s p s y c h ia tr ic c o n d itio n s , a n d m a ln u tr itio n .2 T he A L J det erm i ned thatcl ai m antdoes nots uffe rfr om a combi nat i on of i m pai rm ent s t hatqual i fyas “s ever e” unde rt he Soci al Secur i t yA ctand, cons equent l y , t hat sh e w as n o t disab led p u rsua n t t o 2 0 C . F . R . § 4 1 6 . 9 2 0 (c). O n ap p ea l, the D istri ct C o u rt hel d t hatt he A L J ’ s concl us i on i s s uppor t ed bys ubs t ant i al evi dence and af fi r m ed the d e n ia l o f b e n e f its . A ft err evi ew i ng t hi s cas e, w e conc l ude thatcl ai m anthas notpr es ent ed any re v e rsib le e rro r. S u b sta n tial e v id e n c e su p p o rts th e A L J’s d e ter m in a tio n th a t cla im a n t d id notdemonst r at e “s om ethi ng bey ond ‘ a s l i ghtabnorm al i t yora combi nat i on of s l i ght a b n o rm a lit ies w h ich w o u ld h a v e n o m o re th a n a m in im a l ef f e c t o n a n in d iv id u a l’s a b ili ty t o w or k. ’ ” M cC r ea v. C om m ’ rof Soc. Sec. , 370 F. 3d 357, 360 ( 3d C i r . 2004) ( quot i ng SSR 85- 28, 1985 W L 56856, at*3) . A ccor di ngl y , w e w i l l aff i r m t he O r derof the D i s t r i ct C our t . See i d. at360- 61 ( a det erm i nat i on t hata di s abi l i tycl ai m ant ’ s i m pai r m ent s ar e not “se v ere ” “ is t o b e u p h eld if su p p o rt ed b ysu b stan ti al ev iden ce o n the re co rd a s a w h o le”).