alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      14, 2009 |                                    |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                  | /s/ Mark D. Roberson                    |
|                                  | Mark      D. Roberson                   |
|                                  | Acting      Chief Executive Officer and |
|                                  | Chief      Financial Officer            |

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136159-60 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. RICHARD L. PIESER, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136159-60 

 COA: 275608 
 WCAC: 05-000354 

SARA LEE BAKERY and TRAVELERS 

PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

SECOND INJURY FUND, VOCATIONALLY 

HANDICAPPED PROVISIONS,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
Claude Junior ROUX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-2198

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 26, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Tommy CHAPMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0935

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 23, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas Kreig, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thomas KreigThomas KreigPrincipal Financial OfficerNovember 10, 2010
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Housing & Land Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      November 12, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Cangsang HuangCangsang
      HuangChief
      Financial Officer
Reginald A. RICHARDSON and Corrine J. Richardson, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 3D17-0271

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pegasus Air Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
L. Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
25th day of April, 2005.



/s/ Andrew L. Jones
-------------------------------
Andrew L. Jones
President and CEO
Pegasus Air Group, Inc.
COMMERCE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #9229, Appellant, v. Tony POUTOUS, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2801

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

Affirmed.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

d0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

137153

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137153 COA: 286038 Ingham CC: 06-001171-FH DOUGLAS CHARLE S HASTINGS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 15, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Desmond Ross, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Solar Power Corp (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the fiscal Quarter ended March 31, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Desmond RossName:Desmond RossTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:May 20, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00030

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 211th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 20

- 2590

- 211

Before Womac k , Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curi am Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### Z.R., A C HILD2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On August 5, 2021, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecu tion unless , by August 16, 2021 , appellant filed

with the court a n appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App.

P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have r ece ived no response. Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all co sts of this appeal.

Per Curiam

Delivered : September 16, 2021
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 00-4155

ROSA MOJICA-ANTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.

James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-99-11)

Submitted: February 9, 2001

Decided: February 22, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Margaret McLeod Cain, MARGARET MCLEOD CAIN, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United

States Attorney, Bruce A. Pagel, Assistant United States Attorney,

Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Rosa Mojica-Anton appeals her conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute cocaine

and methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a), 846

(West 1999). Mojica-Anton argues there was insufficient evidence to

support her conviction and that the district court abused its discretion

by refusing to grant her request for a downward departure. We disagree. 

The Government presented evidence establishing Mojica-Anton’s

possession and distribution of controlled substances. The Government

also presented evidence of Mojica-Anton’s involvement in arranging

drug sales. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the

Government, we find the evidence was sufficient to convict MojicaAnton. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). 

Additionally, the district court did not abuse its discretion by

choosing to deny Mojica-Anton’s request for downward departure.

The district court correctly recognized that Mojica-Anton had failed

to present any adequate ground for departure. See United States v.

Perkins, 108 F.3d 512, 515 (4th Cir. 1997) (stating that "disparate

sentences among codefendants is an impermissible ground for departure"). 

Accordingly, we affirm Mojica-Anton’s conviction and sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and

argument would not significantly aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. MOJICA-ANTON
EX PARTE Stacia CROMARTIE

(In re: Stacia Cromartie v. Alabama State University et al.)

2170493

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 1, 2018

Transferred to Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
C.L. v. D.B. and S.F.

2160662

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 2:05-cv-00161-J Document 3 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 8
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of                the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/              Lincoln M.              Dastrup                                                     |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                      |   |   |        |
| Lincoln                M. DastrupChief                Financial OfficerMay                  21, 2007 |   |   |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Navidec Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Robert
D. Grizzle,  President,  Chief Operating  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 16, 2007


/s/Robert D. Grizzle
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert D. Grizzle, Chief Operating Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Terry CHISM, DOC #S11297, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2141

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023146EN.01006501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/65 |

---

Corrigendum to the subheading ‘575TH PLENARY SESSION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE, 14.12.2022-15.12.2022’ in Section I (Resolutions, recommendations and opinions), under the heading ‘EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE’

(
[Official Journal of the European Union C 140 of 21 April 2023](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2023_140_R_TOC)
)

(2023/C 146/11)

On the cover page and on page 1, the subheading:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| for: | ‘575TH PLENARY SESSION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE, 14.12.2022-15.12.2022’ |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| read: | ‘575TH PLENARY SESSION OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE, 24.1.2023-25.1.2023’ |

---
Kelly Falsetti TORRES, Appellant, v. Alexander TORRES, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2659

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
John R. ROBINSON, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1169

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




The
      following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
      of Royal Financial, Inc. on the basis of such officer’s knowledge
      and
      belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002.




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2006 (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                February 14, 2006
            /s/
                  Donald A. Moll
              
              Name:Donald
                A. Moll
              Title:President
                and Chief Executive Officer;
              Acting Principal Accounting Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies
      the Report and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of this
      Report.
Christopher STALLWORTH v. STATE

CR-16-1209

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

Affirmed.
Notice of Regular Meeting

of the Board of Directors

of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

October 11, 2023

SUMMARY: Notice of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Farm 

Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC) is hereby given in accordance with the 

provisions of the Bylaws of the FCSIC.

DATES: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, October 11, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may observe the open portions of this meeting in person at 1501 Farm 

Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to observe, at 

least 24 hours in advance, visit FCSIC.gov, select “News & Events,” then select “Board 

Meetings.” From there, access the linked “Instructions for board meeting visitors” and 

complete the described registration process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you need more information or assistance for 

accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley Waldron, Secretary to the Board. 

Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-4056.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The 

rest of the meeting will be closed to the public. The following matters will be considered:

Portions Open to the Public

• Approval of Minutes for July 12, 2023

• Quarterly FCSIC Financial Reports

• Quarterly Report on Insured Obligations

• Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan

• Annual Performance Plan

• Budget 2024-2025

Portions Closed to the Public

• Confidential Report on Insurance Risk

______________________

Ashley Waldron

Secretary to the Board

September 26, 2023

Date
# C_2018123EN.01000801.xml

| 9.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 21 December 2017 — Ahmad Shah Ayubi

(Case C-713/17)

(2018/C 123/11)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ahmad Shah Ayubi

Applicant:

Defendant authority: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land

Defendant authority:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 29 of Directive 2011/95/EU, (1) under which a Member State has the obligation to provide to beneficiaries of international protection (in the Member State that granted such protection) the necessary social assistance as provided to nationals of that Member State, to be interpreted as satisfying the criteria for direct applicability as developed in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 29 of Directive 2011/95/EU, (1) under which a Member State has the obligation to provide to beneficiaries of international protection (in the Member State that granted such protection) the necessary social assistance as provided to nationals of that Member State, to be interpreted as satisfying the criteria for direct applicability as developed in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union?

1

| 2. | Is Article 29 of Directive 2011/95/EU to be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that only persons granted asylum with permanent residence be given social assistance in the form of needs-based minimum benefits in full and to the same extent as nationals of the Member State, but provides for the reduction of social assistance from needs-based minimum benefits for those persons granted asylum with only temporary residence, and consequently, in the same amount of social assistance as is awarded to persons eligible for subsidiary protection? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 29 of Directive 2011/95/EU to be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that only persons granted asylum with permanent residence be given social assistance in the form of needs-based minimum benefits in full and to the same extent as nationals of the Member State, but provides for the reduction of social assistance from needs-based minimum benefits for those persons granted asylum with only temporary residence, and consequently, in the same amount of social assistance as is awarded to persons eligible for subsidiary protection?

---

(1)  Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9).

1

---