alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Brian A. Lutes, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of The Wornick Company;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

----

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 16, 2006
|        | By:                      | /s/ Brian A. Lutes |
|--------|--------------------------|--------------------|
|   | Brian A. Lutes           |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

2

----
IV 

119TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 92 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2025 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself and Mr. HIMES) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select 

Committee on Intelligence in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee 

4 on Intelligence (hereafter in this resolution referred to as 

5 the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff sala6 ries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $19,240,928 for the One 

9 Hundred Nineteenth Congress. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 92 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $9,538,983 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2025, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2026; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,701,945 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2026, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2027. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer, Director and President and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee
Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
February 8, 2010

/s/ GERARDO I. LOPEZ Gerardo I. Lopez Chief Executive Officer, Director and President/s/ CRAIG R. RAMSEY Craig R. Ramsey Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Marquee
Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---



QuickLinks
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A2042. ODION v. VARON et al.

In 2014, the trial court entered a final order granting summary judgment to the

defendants in this case, and Gege Odion filed an untimely appeal of that order, which

this Court dismissed on April 17, 2015. See Case No. A15A1447. Years later, Odion

filed a number of post-judgment motions, which the trial court dismissed in an order

entered on February 3, 2017. On February 17, 2017, Odion filed an application for

discretionary appeal of that order in this Court, which we dismissed on March 16,

2017. See Case No. A17D0297. Odion also filed a notice of appeal from the same

order seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of our Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court

transferred the appeal to this Court pursuant to OCGA § 15-3-3.1.

1

 This Court then

dismissed that appeal on November 8, 2017. See Case No. A18A0540. Odion filed

a petition for certiorari from that order, and while that petition was pending,

2

he

apparently filed an “Amended Notice of Appeal,” which resulted in the docketing of

an additional appeal in the Supreme Court. See Case No. S18A1188. The Supreme

Court transferred that appeal to this Court on May 23, 2018, noting that they

construed the amended notice of appeal “as another attempt to seek direct review of

the orders that [Odion] previously sought to challenge.” 

1 Under thatstatute, effective January 1, 2017, the Supreme Court no longer has

direct appellate jurisdiction over cases involving title to land or equity. See Ga. L.

2016, p. 883 § 6-1 (effective date).

2 The Supreme Court denied that petition for certiorari on June 4, 2018. See

Case No. S18C0530.

July 27, 2018
Therefore, on two prior occasions, this Court has dismissed Odion’s appeals

from the same February 3, 2017 order at issue in this appeal, and he is barred from

seeking further appellate review of that order. See Ross v. State, 310 Ga. App. 326,

327 (713 SE2d 438) (2011) (dismissal of previous appeal “constitutes binding law of

the case” and precludes appellate review of issues raised in previous appeal);

Potter-Miller v. Reed, 302 Ga. App. 199,200 (2) (690 SE2d 215) (2010) (effect of

dismissal of earlier appeal from the appealable judgment was to affirm the judgment

of the trial court); Echols v. State, 243 Ga. App. 775, 776 (534 SE2d 464) (2000) (“It

is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum. The same is true

of appeals of the same issue on the same grounds.”). 

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/27/2018
Michael Dewayne LOVE v. Ambrea Lashae Love WATERS

2160816

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 9, 2018

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of XsunX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date himself (the “ Report ”), the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:     May
18, 2009





/s/  Tom
      DjokovichName:
      Tom DjokovichTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                Executive
      Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2018052EN.01002001.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany) lodged on 21 November 2017 — QH

(Case C-650/17)

(2018/C 052/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundespatentgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: QH

Applicant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is a product protected by a basic patent in force pursuant to Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 (1) only if it forms part of the subject matter of protection defined by the claims and is thus provided to the expert as a specific embodiment? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is a product protected by a basic patent in force pursuant to Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 (1) only if it forms part of the subject matter of protection defined by the claims and is thus provided to the expert as a specific embodiment?

1

| 2. | Is it not therefore sufficient for the requirements of Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 if the product in question satisfies the general functional definition of a class of active ingredients in the claims, but is not otherwise indicated in individualised form as a specific embodiment of the method protected by the basic patent? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it not therefore sufficient for the requirements of Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 if the product in question satisfies the general functional definition of a class of active ingredients in the claims, but is not otherwise indicated in individualised form as a specific embodiment of the method protected by the basic patent?

| 3. | Is a product not protected by a basic patent in force under Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 if it is covered by the functional definition in the claims, but was developed only after the filing date of the basic patent as a result of an independent inventive step? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is a product not protected by a basic patent in force under Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 if it is covered by the functional definition in the claims, but was developed only after the filing date of the basic patent as a result of an independent inventive step?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2009 L 152, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Alan Finkelstein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Innovative Card
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November __, 2005         By: /s/ Alan Finkelstein
                                 ---------------------------------
                                 Alan Finkelstein
                                 Chief Executive Officer,
                                 President and Secretary
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
Case 4:06-cv-00123-A Document 24 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 101
 

 Case 4:06-cv-00123-A Document 24 Filed 05/23/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 102
 

 Case 4:06-cv-00123-A Document 24 Filed 05/23/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 103
Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 5 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 2 PageID 24
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 5 Filed 08/15/05 Page 2 of 2 PageID 25
James ROBINSON v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-16-0809

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

October 2, 2017 Reh. denied December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reversed and remanded.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

RONNIE GLENN TRIPLETT, 15692-064, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) 3:05-CV-1403-N

)

DAN JOSLIN, Warden, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After making the independent review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that

the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they

are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Moreover, the analysis of the

Magistrate Judge applies with equal force to Petitioner’s First Amended Petition.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation

of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED.

Signed September 7, 2005.

_________________________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01403-N Document 12 Filed 09/07/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 56
Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW   Document 41   Filed 01/05/18   Page 1 of 2

Case 4:16-cv-07387-JSW   Document 41   Filed 01/05/18   Page 2 of 2
NO. 07-04-0544-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

NOVEMBER 30, 2004

______________________________

IN RE MICHAEL LOU GARRETT

_________________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Michael Lou Garrett seeks a writ of mandamus ordering respondent, the

Honorable John B. Board, Judge of the 181st District Court of Potter County, to rule on a

motion pending in cause number 91,954-B. We dismiss the petition.

Relator filed his petition for a writ of mandamus with this Court on November 18,

2004. In the petition he complains that Judge Board has failed to rule on relator’s motion

for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. The clerk of the 181st District

Court has provided this Court with a copy of an order signed by Judge Board on November

19, 2004, denying the motion. Because the trial court has ruled on the motion, as

requested by relator, relator’s request for a writ of mandamus is moot. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed. 

Per Curiam
Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 2 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 3 PageID 25
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 2 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 3 PageID 26
 

 Case 3:06-cv-00252-B Document 2 Filed 02/06/06 Page 3 of 3 PageID 27
SCWC-17-0000873

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER

POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JUNE 1, 2006

SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC TRUST 2006-FR2

MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-FR2,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

PHILIP DETOL, ROXANNE TOM-DETOL,

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000873; CIVIL NO. 15-1-0237)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

The application for writ of certiorari filed on May 6, 2019

by Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants Philip Detol and Roxanne TomDetol is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 1, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000873

01-JUL-2019

12:54 PM
Case 3:05-cv-00731-B Document 11 Filed 05/23/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 43
Case 3:05-cv-00731-B Document 11 Filed 05/23/05 Page 2 of 6 PageID 44
Case 3:05-cv-00731-B Document 11 Filed 05/23/05 Page 3 of 6 PageID 45
Case 3:05-cv-00731-B Document 11 Filed 05/23/05 Page 4 of 6 PageID 46
Case 3:05-cv-00731-B Document 11 Filed 05/23/05 Page 5 of 6 PageID 47
Case 3:05-cv-00731-B Document 11 Filed 05/23/05 Page 6 of 6 PageID 48
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       59,751,119
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      58,155,433
<RECEIVABLES>                                  380,765
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,536,198
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    8,658,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                          8,658,774
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    51,374,972
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                              525
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                              256
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      388,427
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      (290,289)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   (1,595,686)
<NET-ASSETS>                                49,877,424
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            2,764,679
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 517,534
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      2,247,145
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     (215,414)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (1,266,025)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                          765,706
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    2,081,193
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                            269
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                             269
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                        222,475
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                     (74,875)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          171,736
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,536
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                 68,984
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        51,650,403
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                           99,289
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  5,814
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                        (4,168)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                             5,943
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                        5,943
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                             94,992
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.58


</TABLE>