alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 11 PageID 240
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 11 PageID 241
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 3 of 11 PageID 242
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 4 of 11 PageID 243
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 5 of 11 PageID 244
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 6 of 11 PageID 245
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 7 of 11 PageID 246
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 8 of 11 PageID 247
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 9 of 11 PageID 248
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 10 of 11 PageID 249
Case 3:05-cv-01805-L Document 24-10 Filed 08/04/06 Page 11 of 11 PageID 250
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CuraTech Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lincoln
      M. Dastrup, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Lincoln M. Dastrup


Lincoln
      M. Dastrup


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      18, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Two Rivers Water Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John McKowen Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:  November 12, 2010
By: /s/ John McKowenChief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ralph Hamers, certifythat: 

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of ING Groep N.V.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

(d)    Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.    The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 5, 2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KYLE J. STEVENS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 798 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
STATE of Louisiana v. Durrell JOHNSON

No. 2018-KH-1461

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. East Baton Rouge Parish is the proper venue for applicant's parole claims. R.S. 15:571.15. To the extent applicant seeks to withdraw his guilty plea and sentences, his application seeks post-conviction relief. La.C.Cr.P. art. 924. As such, the application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, his sentencing claims are not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030.

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Jfourtlj Court of

iUntonio,

September 30, 2014

No. 04-14-00239-CV

Andrew Mata and Oscar Mata,

Appellants

v.

State Farm Mutual Insurance Company,

Appellees

Trial Court Case No. 2014-CI-03572

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral

argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on November 5, 2014, to the following panel:

Chief Justice Stone, Justice Martinez, and Justice Chapa. All parties will be notified of the

Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such motion should be filed within ten (10)

days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on September 30, 2014.

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said court on this September 30, 2014.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 42 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING THE LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENT OF 
              WORLD WAR II.

    In recognition of Hershel Woodrow ``Woody'' Williams, the last 
surviving recipient of the Medal of Honor for acts performed during 
World War II, his remains shall be permitted to lie in honor in the 
rotunda of the Capitol on Thursday, July 14, 2022, in order to honor 
the Greatest Generation and the more than 16,000,000 men and women who 
served in the Armed Forces of the United States from 1941 to 1945. The 
Architect of the Capitol, under the direction of the President pro 
tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, 
shall take all necessary steps for the accomplishment of that purpose.

            Passed the Senate July 12, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol on Thursday, July 14, 
    2022, for the lying in honor of the remains of Hershel Woodrow 
  ``Woody'' Williams, the last surviving Medal of Honor recipient for 
                  acts performed during World War II.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 21.1
Subsidiaries of InvestorsBancorp, Inc.

                             INVESTORSBANCORP, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF COMPANY                       INCORPORATED IN           SUBSIDIARY OF
---------------                       ---------------           -------------
<S>                                   <C>                    <C>
InvestorsBank,                           Wisconsin           InvestorsBancorp, Inc.
A Wisconsin chartered
bank located in
Pewaukee, Wisconsin

InvestorsBancorp Capital Trust I         Delaware            InvestorsBancorp, Inc.

Investors Subsidiary, Inc.               Wisconsin           InvestorsBancorp, Inc.

Investors Business Credit, Inc.          Nevada              InvestorsBank
</TABLE>
IIA 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 45 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms, and Explosives relating to ‘‘Definition of ‘Frame or Receiver’ 

and Identification of Firearms’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. LEE, Mr. DAINES, 

Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. THUNE, Mr. RUBIO, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. COTTON, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. INHOFE, 

Mr. CRAPO, Mr. RISCH, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

PAUL, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following joint resolution; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to ‘‘Definition of ‘Frame or Receiver’ and 

Identification of Firearms’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bu4 reau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relat5 ing to ‘‘Definition of ‘Frame or Receiver’ and IdentificaVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:31 Apr 28, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ45.IS SJ45

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SJ 45 IS 

1 tion of Firearms’’ (87 Fed. Reg. 24652 (April 26, 2022)), 

2 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6546

GARY E. SMALL, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-01-453-2)

Submitted: May 20, 2002 Decided: June 17, 2002

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary E. Small, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary E. Small, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Small v. Angelone, No. CA-01-453-2 (E.D. Va.

Mar. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Vivalyn ROBINSON, Appellant, v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION, III, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust and Harold A. Robinson, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-410

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed March 12, 2019

Beau Bowin, of Bowin Law Group, Satellite Beach, for Appellant.

David Rosenberg, Cynthia L. Comras and Jarrett Cooper, of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust.

No Appearance for Other Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See**PMT NPL Fin. 2015-1 v. Centurion Systems, LLC*, 257 So.3d 516, 519 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

ORFINGER, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CuraTech Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lincoln
      M. Dastrup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                  Lincoln M. Dastrup
 Lincoln
        M. Dastrup


Chief
      Executive Officer


August
      18, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being
      filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
      document.
Case 2:03-cv-00399-J Document 13 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 1 PageID 89
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 4(a)

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                              BGE CAPITAL TRUST II

          THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of BGE Capital Trust II (the "Trust"), dated
as of August 4, 2003, is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as
trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12
DEL. C. ss. 3801, et seq.).

          (i)  Name. The name of the statutory trust being formed hereby is BGE
Capital Trust II.

          (ii) Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware are:

          The  Bank of New York (Delaware)
          White Clay Center, Route 273
          Newark, DE 19711

          (iii)     Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective
as of its filing.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.

                                The Bank of New York, as Trustee

                                By: /s/ Geovanni Barris
                                   -------------------------
                                   Name: Geovanni Barris
                                   Title: Vice President

                                The Bank of New York (Delaware), as
                                Trustee

                                By: /s/ William T. Lewis
                                   -------------------------
                                   Name: William T. Lewis
                                   Title: Sr. Vice President

                                     /s/ Thomas E. Ruszin, Jr.
                                ---------------------------------
                                 Thomas E. Ruszin, Jr., as Trustee
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the report of Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
Kreig, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Thomas
Kreig


Thomas
Kreig


Principal
Accounting Officer


May 15,
2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIYLEE JONES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 215 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of September, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

The Application to Appear as Amici Curiae is denied as moot.
Pamela GOODMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-2636

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2019

Pamela Goodman, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.1    
    


 
 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
  VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.
  2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN    
    


Effective
May 9, 2003 


        Section 5(a)
of the Veeco Instruments Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), is hereby amended to read, in its entirety, as follows: 





5.    Grant of Awards; Shares Subject to the Plan




        The
Committee may, from time to time, grant Options to one or more Eligible Persons; provided, however, that: 


        (a)    Subject
to Section 9, the aggregate number of shares of Stock in respect of which Options may be granted under the Plan shall not exceed 5,030,000; 




*        *        *        *        * 


        This
Amendment was approved by Veeco's Compensation Committee on March 31, 2003, by its Board of Directors on April 1, 2003, and by its stockholders on May 9, 2003. 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.1


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC. 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN
Exhibit 32.1
 HORIZON LINES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ STEPHEN H. FRASER

Stephen H. Fraser
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)