alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         105,230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  422,147<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,505<F2>
<INVENTORY>                                     30,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               626,318
<PP&E>                                       1,797,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                 638,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,073,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          344,017
<BONDS>                                        686,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,989
<OTHER-SE>                                     851,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,073,469
<SALES>                                      3,217,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,230,300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,888,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,913
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,593
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,593
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<FN>
<F1>Excludes $23,481 of long-term notes receivable.
<F2>Excludes $2,917 of allowance for long-term notes receivable.
<F3>Included in Total costs and expenses line.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Jerry W. KENT v. Heather HERCHENHAN

2160740

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Optionable, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas F Burchill,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









/s/ Thomas F. Burchill


Thomas F.
Burchill


Chief Executive Officer and
President


(Principal Executive
Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 15 (Friday, January 24, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01706]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS25-01]

Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of special closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
codified at 12 U.S.C. 3333(b), notice is hereby given that the 
Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) met for a Special Closed Meeting on this 
date.
    Location: Virtual meeting via Teams.
    Date: January 15, 2025.
    Time: 10:28 a.m. ET.

Discussion Item

Personnel Matter

    The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss a personnel 
matter pursuant to section 1104(b) of title XI (12 U.S.C. 3333(b)). No 
action was taken by the ASC.

Loretta Schuster,
Management & Program Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2025-01706 Filed 1-23-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 21 (Monday, February 3, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Page 8815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02110]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 20, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of 
current, ongoing ASTM activities originating between September 9, 2024, 
and December 20, 2024, designated as Work Items. A complete listing of 
ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available 
at http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
25, 2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 15, 2024 (89 FR 83052).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-02110 Filed 1-31-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



<TABLE>
<S>                                                     <C>
Pegasus No. 1, LLC                                      Delaware
Pegasus GP, LLC                                         Delaware
Pegasus Business Intelligence, LP                       Delaware
Pegasus No. 2, LLC                                      Delaware
TravelWeb, LP                                           Delaware
Pegasus Solutions, Inc. (UK) Limited                    UK
Pegasus Solutions Acquisition Company                   Delaware
Pegasus Solutions Limited                               UK
Pegasus Solutions Companies                             Delaware
Anasazi (UK) Ltd.                                       UK
Anasazi Travel Resources GmbH                           Germany
Anasazi Travel Resources K.K                            Japan
Anasazi Travel Resources Pte Ltd                        Singapore
Golden Tulip Worldwide Ltd.                             UK
Paycom Limited                                          UK
PT Utell International                                  Indonesia
Pegasus Solutions, S.A. de C.V.                         Mexico
Pegasus Solutions Pension Trustees Limited              UK
Summit International Hotels Limited                     UK
Pegasus Solutions (Netherlands) B.V.                    Netherlands
Pegasus Solutions/Utell (Singapore) Pte Ltd             Singapore
Pegasus Solutions Australia Pty Limited                 Australia
Utell India Private Limited                             India
Utell International                                     UK
Pegasus Solutions (Chile) Limitada                      Chile
Utell International (Ireland) Limited                   Ireland
Utell International (Thailand) Ltd.                     Thailand
Utell International (U.K.) Limited                      UK
Utell International Columbia Ltda                       Columbia
Utell International Do Brasil Turismo Ltda              Brazil
Pegasus Solutions Korea Ltd.                            Korea
Pegasus Solutions Srl                                   Italy
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANCISCA MORALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

MASON STREET OPCO, LLC, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00049-VC 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court has been advised by the Notice of Settlement filed on June 13, 2017 that the 

parties have resolved this case. (Re: Dkt. No. 27). Therefore, it is ORDERED that this case is 

DISMISSED without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated. Any 

pending motions are moot.

The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the 

settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on 

opposing counsel within 60 days, the dismissal will be with prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 15, 2017

______________________________________

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge
III 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 130 

Remembering the 5th anniversary of the terrorist attacks at Brussels Airport 

and the Maalbeek metro station in Belgium and honoring the victims 

of the terrorist attacks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2021 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. 

HAGERTY, and Mr. CRUZ) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

MARCH 25, 2021 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Remembering the 5th anniversary of the terrorist attacks 

at Brussels Airport and the Maalbeek metro station in 

Belgium and honoring the victims of the terrorist attacks. 

Whereas, on March 22, 2016, 35 people were killed and more 

than 300 people were wounded by 3 bombs that detonated at Brussels Airport in Zaventem, Belgium, and the 

Maalbeek metro station in Brussels, Belgium (referred to 

in this preamble as the ‘‘terrorist attacks’’); 

Whereas Justin Shults, Stephanie Shults, Gail Minglana 

Martinez, and Bruce Baldwin were Americans who lost 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 130 ATS 

their lives, among the many other victims, as a result of 

the terrorist attacks; 

Whereas Justin Shults, an east Tennessee native who was 30 

years old and working as an accountant while living in 

Brussels at the time of the terrorist attacks, was a graduate of Vanderbilt University and a devoted husband to 

his wife Stephanie; 

Whereas Stephanie Shults, a Kentucky native who was 29 

years old and working as an accountant while living in 

Brussels at the time of the terrorist attacks, was a graduate of Vanderbilt University, where she met her husband Justin; 

Whereas Gail Minglana Martinez, a Texas native who was 41 

years old at the time of the terrorist attacks, was a proud 

mother of 4 children and wife to her husband Kato, who 

were all injured in the terrorist attacks; and 

Whereas Bruce Baldwin, a Missouri native who was 66 years 

old at the time of the terrorist attacks, was a husband 

to his wife Virginia, had worked for the Department of 

State, and was a member of the Army who served in 

Vietnam: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) remembers the 5th anniversary of the 

3 March 22, 2016, terrorist attacks at Brussels Air4 port and the Maalbeek metro station in Belgium (re5 ferred to in this resolution as the ‘‘terrorist at6 tacks’’); 

7 (2) honors the memory of Justin Shults, Steph8 anie Shults, Gail Minglana Martinez, and Bruce 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 130 ATS 

1 Baldwin, the 4 Americans who lost their lives in the 

2 terrorist attacks; 

3 (3) expresses its deepest condolences— 

4 (A) to the other victims who were killed or 

5 wounded as a result of the terrorist attacks; 

6 (B) to the families of the victims; and 

7 (C) to the home countries of each victim; 

8 and 

9 (4) pledges continued resolve to stand against 

10 terrorism and extremism. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Tor SKRODER, Appellant, v. Guillermo TEJADA and Gustavo Lorenzo, Appellees.

No. 4D18-2680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 2, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1094 

(Serial No. 76/600,374) 

IN RE MARISOL, LLC 

John Joseph Hall, Law Offices of John Joseph Hall, of Los Angeles, California, 

argued for appellant. 

 Christina J. Hieber, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent 

and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States 

Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, 

and Thomas V. Shaw, Associate Solicitor. 

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office 

 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board 

 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-1094 

(Serial No. 76/600,374) 

IN RE MARISOL, LLC 

 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial 

and Appeal Board 

in CASE NO(S). Serial No. 76/600,374 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and 

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED June 20, 2008 _/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAISY SAJI, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, ET AL., 

Defendants.

CASE NO. 17-cv-00025-YGR 

ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SUBMISSION;

VACATING HEARING

Re: Dkt. No. 17 

The Court has reviewed the parties’ filings on defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 

17.) The Court requires further information on the relationship between plaintiff’s bankruptcy 

proceedings and this litigation, particularly whether the bankruptcy trustee is the true party-ininterest here, and whether such trustee must thus be substituted as the real plaintiff. The parties 

must file a joint statement no longer than ten (10) pages addressing their perspectives on this issue 

no later than April 4, 2017. 

The Court further VACATES the hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss currently set for 

April 4, 2017. The Court may reset a hearing or require further briefing after the parties have filed 

their joint statement. Absent further notice, the Court will issue a written decision on the papers. 

See Civil L.R. 7-1(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 27, 2017 

 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 4:17-cv-00025-YGR Document 23 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 1
Daniel E. OSBORNE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Lisa C. CARPENTER, f/k/a Lisa C. Osborne, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-4575

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 28, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EX PARTE LIMESTONE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION

(In re: E.E. v. Limestone County Board of Education)

2170533

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 14, 2018

Mand. pet. granted.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 4437** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. MANUEL MANUEL HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Armando Quintero Fernandez, a/k/a Pedro Macedo Brito, a/k/a Manuel Hernandez Fern andez , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00198

- NCT

- 1 )

Submitted : January 26, 2011 Decided: Ma rch 11 , 2011

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, Mireille P. Clough, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appella nt. John W. Stone, Jr., Acting United States Attorney, Angela H. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Manuel Manuel Hernandez p leaded guilty to illegally reentering the country after having been deported following a conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1326(a), (b)(2) (2006). The district court sentenced Hernandez to sixty

- four months of imprisonment a nd he now appeals. Finding no error, we affirm. Hernandez argues that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. We review a sentence for reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard. Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); see als o United States v. Layton , 564 F.3d 330, 335 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 130 S. Ct. 290 (2009). In so doing, we first examine the sentence for “significant procedural error,” including “failing to calculate (or improperly calculating) the [g]uidelines range , treating the [g]uidelines as mandatory, failing to consider the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) [(2006)] factors, selecting a sentence based on clearly erroneous facts, or failing to adequately explain the chosen
sentence . . . .” Gall , 552 U.S. at 51
. We the n “‘consider the substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed.’” United States v. Evans , 526 F.3d 155, 161 (4th Cir. 2008 ) (quoting Gall , 552 U.S. at 51 ). If the sentence is within the guidelines range, we apply a presumption of reasonableness. Un ited States v. Go , 517 F.3d 216, 218 (4th3 Cir. 2008); see also Rita v. United States , 551 U.S. 338, 346

- 59 (2007) (upholding presumption of reasonableness for within

- guidelines sentence). “The fact that we might reasonably conclude that a different senten ce is appropriate is insufficient to justify reversal of the district court.” Go , 517 F.3d at 218 (citation omitted). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that Hernandez has failed to rebut the presumption we accord on appeal to his within

- guidelines
sentence. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisiona l
process.
AFFIRMED
FCC 335-AM

April 2021

Attachment for Notification of AM All-Digital Operations

New all-digital AM notification requirements have been added to new section 73.406 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

9. All-digital AM station filers must submit an attachment to the FCC 335-AM Digital Notification 

containing the following information:

(a) For all-digital AM stations, the type of notification (all-digital notification, increase in 

nominal power, reduction in nominal power, transition from core-only to enhanced, 

transition from enhanced to core-only, reversion from all-digital to hybrid or analog 

operation); 

(b) the date that new or modified all-digital operation will commence or has ceased; 

(c) the nominal power of the all-digital station;

(d) a certification that the all-digital operations will conform to the relevant nominal power and 

spectral emissions limits;

(e) For all-digital AM stations, if a notification of commencement of new all-digital service or a 

nominal power change, whether the station is operating in core-only or enhanced mode.

(f) For all-digital AM stations, a certification that the all-digital station complies with all EAS 

requirements.
Exhibit 13.2 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 oftitle 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ING Groep N.V., a public limited company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Dated: March 12, 2012 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ING Groep N.V. and will beretained by ING Groep N.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request.