alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                ORA FOIA Electronic Reading Room

ORA FOIA Electronic Reading Room Home
          About FDA
          FDA Organization
          Office of Regulatory Affairs
          ORA FOIA Electronic Reading Room
          Data SetsORA FOIA Electronic Reading Room Data Sets
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintORA makes FDA Data Dashboard available to the public providing data on inspections, compliance and recalls.

List of ORA Data Sets

Enforcement Activity
	Enforcement Reports
	Import Alerts
	Import Filer Evaluation Outcomes
	Import Refusals
	Inspections Database
	Inspections/483 Database Search
	Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts
	FDA Data Dashboard
	FDA Open Data

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      10/02/2020ORA FOIA Electronic Reading Room
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Exhibit 10.5
 P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
 1. Establishment, Purpose and Term of Plan.
 Establishment and History Plan
 Purpose
 Term of Plan
 2. Definitions and Construction.
 Definitions
 Board
 Code
 Committee
 Company
 1




---



##### 



Compensation
 Employee
 Fair Market Value The Wall Street Journal
 Offering
 Offering Date
 Offering Period
 2




---



##### 



Parent Corporation
 Participant
 Participating Company
 Participating Company Group
 Purchase Date
 Purchase Period
 Purchase Price
 Purchase Right
 Stock
 Subscription Agreement
 Subscription Date
 Subsidiary Corporation
 3




---



##### 



Construction
 3. Administration.
 Administration by the Board
 Authority of Officers
 Policies and Procedures Established by the Company
 4. Shares Subject to Plan.
 Maximum Number of Shares Issuable
 4




---



##### 



Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure New Shares
 5. Eligibility.
 Employees Eligible to Participate
 Exclusion of Certain Stockholders
 6. Offerings.
 Offering Periods Offering Period
 5




---



##### 



Purchase Periods
 7. Participation in the Plan.
 Initial Participation
 Continued Participation
 8. Right to Purchase Shares.
 Grant of Purchase Right
 Calendar Year Purchase Limitation
 6




---



##### 



9. Purchase Price.
  10. Accumulation of Purchase Price Through Payroll Deduction.
  Amount of Payroll Deductions
 Commencement of Payroll Deductions
 Election to Change or Stop Payroll Deductions Change Notice Date
 7




---



##### 



Administrative Suspension of Payroll Deductions
 Participant Accounts
 No Interest Paid
 Voluntary Withdrawal from Plan Account
 11. Purchase of Shares.
 Exercise of Purchase Right
 8




---



##### 



Pro Rata Allocation of Shares
 Delivery of Certificates
 Return of Cash Balance
 Tax Withholding
 Expiration of Purchase Right
 Reports to Participants
 9




---



##### 



12. Withdrawal from the Plan.
 Voluntary Withdrawal from the Plan
 Return of Payroll Deductions
 13. Termination of Employment.
  14. Change in Control.
 Definitions
 Ownership Change Event
 Change in Control Transaction
 10




---



##### 



Transferee Corporation(s)
 Effect of Change in Control on Purchase Rights Acquiring Corporation
 15. Nontransferability of Purchase Rights.
  16. Compliance with Securities Law.
  11




---



##### 



17. Rights as a Stockholder and Employee.
  18. Legends.
  19. Notification of Sale of Shares.
  20. Notices.
  12




---



##### 



21. Indemnification.
  22. Amendment or Termination of the Plan.
 Additional Shares
  Tracy DurchslagSecretaryOctober 14, 2009Date adopted
 13
Sallie Mae SHEALY v. Lucy M. COOKS and James Foster

2170343

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2018

Dismissed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, George P. Christopulos, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, and CFO (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of Tintic Gold Mining Company (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report; 4. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including any consolidated subsidiary, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this Quarterly Report, the Registrant's conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. As the Registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls.  Date:May 11, 2007By:/s/George P. ChristopulosGeorge P. ChristopulosCEO, President, CFO and Chairman of the Board
Darrell USRY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D19-0939

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 17, 2019

Darrell Usry, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Lewis, Wetherell, and Jay, JJ., concur.
AMENDMENT #6 TO AMERICAN DENTAL PARTNERS A&R 1996 DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN



 Exhibit 4(e) 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 6 
 TO 
 AMERICAN DENTAL PARTNERS, INC. 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 1996 DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  
 The American Dental Partners, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended pursuant to the following provisions: 
  
 1.    Definitions 
  
 All capitalized terms used in this amendment which are not otherwise defined
herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Plan. 
  
 2.    Shares Subject To Plan 
  
 The total number of Shares for which Options may be granted under the Plan, as provided under §4 of the Plan, as previously adjusted and increased, is increased by 75,000 Shares to a total of 260,000 Shares. 
  
 3     Effective Date; Construction 
  
 The effective date of this amendment is May 2, 2003, and this amendment shall
be deemed to be a part of the Plan as of such date. In the event of any inconsistencies between the provisions of the Plan and this amendment, the provisions of this amendment shall control. Except as modified by this amendment, the Plan shall
continue in full force and effect without change.
Shawn E. HAMMONDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-167

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019 Rehearing Denied June 5, 2019

Shawn E. Hammonds, Miami, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JUNE 11, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-15747

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00079-CR-FTM-33-DNF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STURLEE BROWN, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(June 11, 2009)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John E. Fernandez, appointed counsel for Sturlee Brown, III, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Brown’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.

2
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| 1. | The                Second Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company                for the                fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities                and                Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 8, 2008 | By:    | */s/                Tom Djokovich*     |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                               | Name:  | Tom                Djokovich           |
|                               | Title: | Chief                Executive Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 37 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 305
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 37

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by Centers for Disease 
 Control and Prevention relating to ``Requirement for Persons To Wear 
        Masks While on Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2022

   Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Braun, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Scott of Florida, 
 Mr. Wicker, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Tuberville, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Hoeven, 
Mr. Lee, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
 Daines, and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following joint resolution; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

                             March 15, 2022

  Committee discharged; by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by Centers for Disease 
 Control and Prevention relating to ``Requirement for Persons To Wear 
        Masks While on Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
relating to ``Requirement for Persons To Wear Masks While on 
Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs'' (86 Fed. Reg. 8025 (February 
3, 2021); determined through a letter of opinion from the Government 
Accountability Office dated December 14, 2021, and printed in the 
Congressional Record on December 15, 2021, on pages S9206-S9208, that 
the order is a rule under the Congressional Review Act), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.

                                                       Calendar No. 305

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by Centers for Disease 
 Control and Prevention relating to ``Requirement for Persons To Wear 
        Masks While on Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 15, 2022

  Committee discharged; by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c), and 
                         placed on the calendar
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

The undersigned Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee Holdings Inc.
(the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 29, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
August 11, 2006

|/s/PETER C. BROWNPeter C. Brown
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/CRAIG R. RAMSEYCraig R. Ramsey
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer       |  | 

[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Marquee Holdings Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

34

---



QuickLinks
BEN'S AUTO MARINE SUPPLY, INC. d/b/a Ben's Paint Supply, Appellant, v. ST. JOHN'S AUTO BODY INC., Kent Scroggins and Sherri Scroggins a/k/a Toni Scroggins, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-2352

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 7, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION.**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 24 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.24
                                     Agreed to December 20, 2021        

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty one

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1605, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall make the following corrections:
        (1) In the table in section 2301(a), in the item relating to 
    Eielson Air Force Base, strike ``$44,850,00'' in the amount column 
    and insert ``$44,850,000''.
        (2) In section 4601, in the table relating to Military 
    Construction, Navy, in the item relating to AEGIS Ashore Barracks 
    Planning and Design in Redzikowo, Poland, insert ``0'' in the 
    Conference Authorized column.
Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Vito Paul CITO III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2812

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Lauri BURRIS, Doug Rowe, Melissa Burris, Ronald E. Brown, Jr., Gregory F. Burris and Jacob Chapman, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-4502

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 7, 2019

Mitchell A. Stone of Jacksonville; H. Franklin Robbins, Jr. of Orlando; and Steven G. Mason of Altamonte Springs, for Petitioners.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *See**Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Fin., Inc.* , 219 So. 3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; *Eutsay v. State* , 103 So. 3d 181, 182-83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
# C_2016232EN.01003001.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/30

---

Action brought on 3 May 2016 – Sun Media v EUIPO – Meta4 Spain (METABOX)

(Case T-204/16)

(2016/C 232/38)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sun Media Ltd (Central Hong Kong, Hong-Kong Special Administrative Region of China) (represented by: A. Schnider, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Meta4 Spain, SA (Las Rozas, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘METABOX’ – Application for registration No 11 819 125

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before EUIPO:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 February 2016 in Case R 307/2015-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and, in case it intervenes in writing, the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO, to bear their own costs and to compensate the costs incurred by the plaintiff in the proceedings before the General Court and in the appellate proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, in case it intervenes in writing, the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO, to bear their own costs and to compensate the costs incurred by the plaintiff in the proceedings before the General Court and in the appellate proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Articles 75 et sqq of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 75 et sqq of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of the EUIPO’s duty to exercise its powers in accordance with the general principles of European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the EUIPO’s duty to exercise its powers in accordance with the general principles of European Union law.

---
Case 2:05-cv-00158-J Document 8 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 37
Chance Monte DAWKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2214

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.