alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San Francisco, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

ORDER

Presidio Health, Inc. v. Excel ER Physicians, PLLC, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-00171-SK

LOCKE LORD LLP

Regina J. McClendon (SBN 184669)

rmcclendon@lockelord.com

Lindsey E. Kress (SBN 278213)

lkress@lockelord.com

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 318-8810

Fax: (415) 676-5816

SANDERS COLLINS PLLC

Jason L. Sanders (SBN 230245)

jsanders@lockelord.com

Johnathan E. Collins (pro hac vice)

jcollins@sanderscollins.com

1919 McKinney Avenue

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: (214) 430-4286

Attorneys for Defendants

Excel ER Physicians, PLLC and Excel ER Physicians East Texas, PLLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PRESIDIO HEALTH, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EXCEL ER PHYSICIANS, PLLC, a Texas 

Professional Limited Liability Company, 

EXCEL ER PHYSICIANS EAST TEXAS, 

PLLC, a Texas Professional Limited Liability 

Company, and Does 1-100, inclusive,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: 3:17-cv-00171-SK

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION 

AND REQUEST TO EXTEND SETTING OF 

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 

CONFERENCE

Complaint filed: January 12, 2017

Pursuant to the joint stipulation to extend time to set the Initial Case Management 

Conference and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that: 
Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100

San Francisco, CA 94104

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

ORDER

Presidio Health, Inc. v. Excel ER Physicians, PLLC, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-00171-SK

1. The Initial Case Management Conference shall be set for no sooner than September 

26, 2017.

2. The Initial Case Management Conference shall be reset for 1:30 p.m. on October 2,

2017. 

3. The deadlines associated with the Initial Case Management Conference will be 

continued according to the new setting of the Initial Case Management Conference. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:_May 30, 2017 _

___________________________________

The Honorable Sallie Kim 

United States Magistrate Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 2, 2011 

p0126 

Order 

 

February 2, 2011 

142198 

In re Parole of Michelle Elias. 

_________________________________________/ 

MACOMB PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142198 

 COA: 300113 

Macomb CC: 2010-001213-AP 

MICHELLE ELIAS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

and 

MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, 

 Interventor. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 21, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. 

 We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court of 

Appeals together with the case of People v Haeger (Docket No. 141718), which we 

remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted by order dated 

February 2, 2011, at such future session of the Court of Appeals as both cases are ready 

for submission. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
R.V., the Father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D18-1888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 17, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 2 of 14 PageID 2
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 3 of 14 PageID 3
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 4 of 14 PageID 4
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 5 of 14 PageID 5
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 6 of 14 PageID 6
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 7 of 14 PageID 7
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 8 of 14 PageID 8
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 9 of 14 PageID 9
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 10 of 14 PageID 10
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 11 of 14 PageID 11
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 12 of 14 PageID 12
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 13 of 14 PageID 13
Case 7:06-cv-00023-R Document 1 Filed 02/10/06 Page 14 of 14 PageID 14
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armitage Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laurence
Stephenson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of May, 2006.


/s/  Laurence Stephenson
------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:05-cr-00075-N Document 420 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 838
STATE of Louisiana v. Joshua Rae SWAN

NO. 2019-KO-0151

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.

WEIMER, J., recused.

HUGHES, J., would grant.
March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017

Assets

Cash and Cash Equivalents 7,682,957 $ 1,613,124 $ 

Investments in U.S. Treasury Obligations 4,585,792,206 B 4,454,235,266 A

Accrued Interest Receivable 18,196,976 21,893,987 

Premium Receivable 53,922,000 340,565,000 

Other Receivables 76,248,331 B 30,011,417 A

Prepaid Expenses - - 

General Property, Equipment, and Software, Net 73,331 77,914 

Total Assets 4,741,915,801 $ 4,848,396,708 $ 

Liabilities and Insurance Fund

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses 662,124 $ 678,547 $ 

Farm Credit Insurance Fund

 Unallocated Insurance Fund Balance 4,741,253,677 4,671,886,526

Allocated Insurance Fund Balance 0 175,831,635

Total Insurance Fund 4,741,253,677 $ 4,847,718,161 $ 

Total Liabilities and Insurance Fund 4,741,915,801 $ 4,848,396,708 $ 

March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)

A - Reflects a reclassification entry debiting Other Receivables and crediting Investments in U.S. 

Treasury Obligations for $30,011,417.39 due to maturity of an investment security at 12/31/2017 

which fell on a weekend. The settlement date was not until January.

B - Reflects a reclassification entry debiting Other Receivables and crediting Investments in U.S. 

Treasury Obligations for $76,248,330.76 due to maturity of an investment security at 03/31/2018 

which fell on a weekend. The settlement date was not until April.
Calendar Year to Date Calendar Year to Date

March 31, 2018 March 31, 2017

Income

Premiums 53,922,000 $ 87,183,999 $ 

Interest Income on Investments 16,424,794 13,291,673 

Total Income 70,346,794 $ 100,475,672 $ 

Expenses

Administrative Operating Expenses 979,643 $ 963,636 $ 

$ 963,636 979,643 $ 

Net Income 69,367,151 $ 99,512,036 $ 

Balance at January 1, 2018 $ 4,847,718,161

Payment to AIRAs Accountholders (175,831,635)

Net Income 69,367,151 

Balance at March 31, 2018 4,741,253,677 $ 

(Unaudited)

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

Statement of Revenue and Expense

Period Ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017

Statement of Changes in Insurance Fund

Period Ended March 31, 2018

(Unaudited)
Russ Franklin Joel WILSON, Sr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0820

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 22, 2019

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Housing and Land Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated:  May 15, 2006                        By:      /s/ Wan Yulong
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Wan Yulong
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

                                       13
S.L. v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2161036

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 2, 2018

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.10

                         LASER-CARD SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                        VALUE-ADDED RESELLER CERTIFICATE

THIS CERTIFICATE CERTIFIES that BSI2000, INC. headquartered in Lakewood,
Colorado is a Value Added Reseller (VAR) of LaserCard Systems Corporation (LSC)
and has met all VAR qualification requirements through JUNE 4, 2004.

Provided BSI2000, Inc. remains in good standing and maintains all VAR
performance goals as defined within the valid VAR agreement, LaserCard Systems
will make available to BSI2000, Inc. software and hardware products, including
LaserCard(R) brand optical memory cards, at VAR pricing for commercial resale.
Products offered are by design intended to assist VARs to develop application
programs to support the end user marketplace. A range of LaserCard Systems
products is marketed to VARs for such use. This Certificate is part of the LSC
VAR Agreement, grants no additional rights beyond those defined by the VAR
Agreement itself, and is not valid without such VAR Agreement being in force.

LaserCard Systems Corporation is committed to the creation of a strong and
vigorous optical memory card business, based on providing products for system
integration and application development. LSC has pursued this goal since its
formation as a wholly owned subsidiary and licensee of Drexler Technology
Corporation in 1989. LaserCard Systems maintains a staff of highly qualified
engineers to develop and support the product line, and who area resource of
technical information related to the optical memory card industry. Drexler
Technology Corporation, the parent corporation, is the patent holder on optical
memory card technology and provides the LaserCard brand optical memory cards
sold through LaserCard Systems Corporation. Optical memory cards and related
technology are the main business of Drexler Technology Corporation.

Dated:   June 3, 2003                           /s/ Richard M. Haddock
       -------------------------------         --------------------------------
                                               Richard M. Haddock
                                               President
Corporate Seal                                 LaserCard Systems Corporation
Raymond KING v. STATE of Louisiana

NO. 2018-KH-0982

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 2019

Denied.
T.C. v. A.F.

2170191

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 30, 2018

Affirmed.
Joseph SEDLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-1404

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Desmin Dwight REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3811

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Decarlo Antuann MITCHELL, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3271

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornell Niles, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
James Franklin RICHBURG, DOC #H51889, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2201

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 3, 2019.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Daniel Muller, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 44 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY FOR PRES4 ENTATION OF STATUE OF HARRY S. TRUMAN 

5 FROM THE PEOPLE OF MISSOURI. 

6 The State of Missouri is authorized to use the ro7 tunda of the Capitol on September 29, 2022, for a cere8 mony to present the statue of Harry S. Truman from the 

9 people of Missouri for placement in the rotunda of the 

10 Capitol. Physical preparations for the conduct of the cere11 mony shall be carried out in accordance with such condi12 tions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the Senate September 12, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 44 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol 

Truman from the people of Missouri. for a ceremony to present the statue of Harry S.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40027 Summary Calendar

DANIEL JOHN SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NUECES COUNTY ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-97-CV-255

- - - - - - - - - - December 8, 1998 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Daniel John Sheehan, Texas prisoner # 426771, appeals the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Sheehan argues that the magistrate judge erred in not allowing Sheehan to dismiss his complaint voluntarily, in determining that the sheriffs could not be held responsible on a theory of respondeat superior, by dismissing the false arrest and false imprisonment claims against the sheriffsNo. 98-40027 -2-

** Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). and the counties, by adding defendants to the case and adding back into the case defendants who had been dismissed, and in concluding that the complaint failed to state a claim regarding the seizure of Sheehan’s legal materials, and abused her discretion by dismissing the complaint prior to service or discovery and without allowing Sheehan to amend his pleadings, and in concluding that the complaint failed to state a claim regarding the seizure of Sheehan’s legal materials. We have reviewed throughly the record, briefs, and arguments and find no reversible error. We AFFIRM the dismissal of Sheehan’s complaint essentially for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in Sheehan v. County of Gregg et al. , U.S.D.C. C-97-255 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 1997). We are able to dispose of the appeal on the record before us, Sheehan’s motion for a transcript of the Spears ** hearing at government expense is
DENIED. The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2
Exhibit 15.1







August 8,
2008





Bois
d'Arc Energy, Inc.


Chase Tower


600
Travis, Suite 5200


Houston,
TX 77002





Shareholders
and Board of Directors


Bois
d'Arc Energy, Inc.





We are
aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-127744 filed on Form S-8 of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc. and in the Registration
Statement filed on Form S-4 (No. 333-151509) of Stone Energy Corporation for the
registration of 11,347,000 shares of its common stock and in the related joint
proxy statement of our report dated August 8, 2008 relating to the
unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Bois d'Arc Energy, Inc.
that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008.







/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP





Dallas,
Texas
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.15



   List of Contents of Exhibits and Schedules to the Royal Insurance Company
                  of America Administrative Services Agreement



        Exhibits                                Description
        --------                                -----------

Exhibit A                              Administrative Services Intellectual
                                       Property License Agreement

Exhibit B                              RSA Reinsurance Security Guidelines

Exhibit C                              Form of Report Required Pursuant to
                                       Section 7.1



        Schedules                                Description
        ---------                                -----------

Schedule 4.5(a)                        Levels of Treaty Reinsurance
Case 3:06-cr-00025-N Document 37 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 88
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3160

_____________________________

KENNETH ALEXANDER MARR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County.

Phillip A. Pena, Judge.

April 11, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler K. Payne, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Louis VANSCOY, as personal representative of the Estate of Robert John Sajnacki, deceased v. WHISPERING PINES OF LAY LAKE, INC.

1160625

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Pamela KAZES & Unknown Spouse of Pamela Kazes, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al, Appellee/respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0994

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Andrew Ridge KING, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-183

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 7, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Brenda DICKERSON et al. v. William BELL, in his official capacity as the Mayor of Birmingham, et al.

1160366

Supreme Court of Alabama.

October 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Presidential Documents

8233 

Federal Register 

Vol. 90, No. 17 

Tuesday, January 28, 2025 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 10885 of January 20, 2025 

Flying the Flag of the United States at Full-Staff on Inauguration Day 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the 

United States of America, and in honor of Inauguration Day and everything 

good and noble that it represents about our Nation, our people, and our 

form of Government, I hereby order that, on this and all future Inauguration 

Days, the flag of the United States shall be flown at full-staff. 

Accordingly, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be 

flown at full-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and 

grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels 

of the Federal Government, in the District of Columbia and throughout 

the United States and its Territories and possessions, for the remainder 

of this day beginning immediately. 

I also direct that, for the same period of time, the flag shall be flown 

at full-staff at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and 

other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels 

and stations. 

Upon the end of this Inauguration Day, I hereby order that the flag of 

the United States shall be returned to half-staff as directed by Proclamation 

10876 of December 29, 2024 (Announcing the Death of James Earl Carter, 

Jr.), in recognition of the memory of our former President, until the period 

of 30 days from the day of his death has concluded. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-D0
8234 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 28, 2025 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day 

of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-five, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fortyninth. 

[FR Doc. 2025–01899 

Filed 1–27–25; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-D0Trump.EPS</GPH>
K.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2197

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 27, 2019.

**FLORIDA DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 

Yes o No x

 

**APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:**

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes o No o

 

**APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:**

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of November 1, 2006: 112,999,986