alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Syntel, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Bharat Desai, Chairman of the Company, Prashant
Ranade, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Arvind Godbole, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Information Security Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Bharat Desai     
|Bharat Desai         
|Syntel, Inc. Chairman
|                     
|March 03, 2011       



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Prashant Ranade                               
|Prashant Ranade                                   
|Syntel, Inc. Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                                  
|March 03, 2011                                    



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Arvind Godbole                                          
|Arvind Godbole                                              
|Syntel, Inc.                                                
|Chief Financial Officer & Chief Information Security Officer
|                                                            
|March 03, 2011                                              

A signed original of this written
statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING JOINT

REQUEST TO SEVER AND STAY THE ’844, ’780, 

AND ’494 PATENTS AS MODIFIED BY THE 

COURT

Case No. 5:17-cv-00072-BLF

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(SAN JOSE DIVISION)

FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 

Company,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California 

Corporation, 

 Defendant.

Case No. 5:17-cv-00072-BLF

CORRECTED ORDER ON JOINT

REQUEST TO SEVER AND STAY THE 

’844, ’780, AND ’494 PATENTS AS 

MODIFIED BY THE COURT

To preserve the resources of the parties and in the interest of judicial economy, the Court 

GRANTS the joint request of counsel to sever United States Patent Nos. 6,154,844; 6,804,780; and 

8,677,494 from this matter and stay the litigation, including deferring trial as to those three patents,

pending completion of any appellate review of the District Court’s amended order (Dkt. No. 869) 

of March 29, 2021 in Finjan v. ESET (S.D. Cal Case No. 17-cv-0183).

The Court TERMINATES the pending motion on collateral estoppel at ECF 759 WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may re-notice the motion after the lapse of the stay, if appropriate. 

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 772 Filed 05/04/21 Page 1 of 2
2 CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING JOINT

REQUEST TO SEVER AND STAY THE ’844, ’780, 

AND ’494 PATENTS AS MODIFIED BY THE 

COURT

Case No. 5:17-cv-00072-BLF

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4, 2021

Hon. Beth Labson Freeman

United States District Court

Case 5:17-cv-00072-BLF Document 772 Filed 05/04/21 Page 2 of 2
Skip to main content
          Skip to FDA Search
          Skip to in this section menu
          Skip to footer links


U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government

					Here’s how you know
          			Dot gov**The .gov means it’s official.**Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
							      SSL**The site is secure.** The **https://** ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely. 
			U.S. Food and Drug Administration
				
        Search
            Menu
							
						Search FDA
									
									Submit search 
		Featured
							Contact FDA
	                FDA Guidance Documents
	                Recalls, Market Withdrawals and Safety Alerts
	                Press Announcements
	                Warning Letters
	                Advisory Committees
	                En Español

					Products
            Food
							Drugs
							Medical Devices
							Radiation-Emitting Products
							Vaccines, Blood, and Biologics
							Animal and Veterinary
							Cosmetics
							Tobacco ProductsTopics
            About FDA
							Combination Products
							Regulatory Information
							Safety
							Emergency Preparedness
							International Programs
							News and Events
							Training and Continuing Education
							Inspections and Compliance
							Science and ResearchInformation For
            Consumers
	            Patients
	            Industry
	            Health Professionals
	            Federal, State and Local Officials 
 In this section:

                FDA Organization Charts

FDA Organization Charts Home
          About FDA
          FDA Organization
          FDA Organization Charts
          Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Organization ChartFDA Organization Charts Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Organization Chart
  
  	
    Share
    Post
    Linkedin

    Email
    PrintCFSAN Leadership Chart 2022 04 14
Text version of the above chart | Printer-friendly Version (PDF - 74KB)

Return to FDA Organization Charts

                                                                                  Content current as of:
      09/08/2023FDA Organization Charts
 
 Footer Links
    FDA Archive
          About FDA
          Accessibility
      Visitor Information
          Website Policies / Privacy
          No FEAR Act
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
      FOIA
          HHS.gov
          USA.gov
    Contact FDA
      Follow FDA on Facebook
      Follow FDA on X
      Follow FDA on Instagram
      Follow FDA on LinkedIn
      View FDA videos on YouTube
      Subscribe to FDA RSS feeds
    FDA Homepage
    Contact Number
      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) Back toTop
Alexandre OLIVA, etc., Appellant, v. Ronald CICERCHIA, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1471

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 6, 2019.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Cassandra Nicole SPENCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3063

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Marvin VINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-1140

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 5, 2019

Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Roy D. Wasson ; Stephen M. Zukoff, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7681

WILLARD TALLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHERRY WILSON, R.N.; JAMES C. WILLETT, Superintendent;

SERGEANT SCKINTO; MAJOR M.A. BENNETT, Deputy Superintendent;

DR. SHEETS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:06-cv-01410-LMB)

Submitted: March 26, 2008 Decided: April 21, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willard Talley, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD,

PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Willard Talley appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Talley v. Wilson,

No. 1:06-cv-01410-LMB (E.D. Va., filed Oct. 17, 2007 & entered

Oct. 19, 2007). We deny Talley’s motion to appoint counsel and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

§

LETRESS McCUIN, #04082384, §

 §

Plaintiff, §

 § Civil Action No. 3:05-cv-2199-R

v. §

 §

GARY JOHNSON, et al. §

 §

Defendant. §

ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge William Sanderson filed Findings, Conclusions and a

Recommendation (“FC&R”) in this case on January 9, 2006. In that decision, the Magistrate Judge

recommended that Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for want of

prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Magistrate Judge

noted that as of the date of the decision, Petitioner had failed to comply with an earlier order entered

in the case and had failed to notify the Court of her new address. See FC&R at 2. The Magistrate

Judge’s decision was returned as undeliverable to Petitioner on January 25, 2006; the stamp on the

face of the returned envelope stated that Petitioner was no longer in the Dallas County Jail. See Dkt.

Doc. No. 6 (3:05-cv-2199). 

The Court proceeds under the assumption that Petitioner has failed to notify the Court of her

new address. Accordingly, after reviewing the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and

Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), the Court concludes that they are correct and are

hereby ADOPTED as the findings of this Court. This case will be dismissed without prejudice by

separate order of the Court.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION

FILED

January 31, 2006

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02199-R Document 7 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 2 PageID 19
IT IS SO ORDERED

ENTERED: January31, 2006

___________________________________

HON. JERRY BUCHMEYER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

 Case 3:05-cv-02199-R Document 7 Filed 01/31/06 Page 2 of 2 PageID 20
Christopher CARITHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3695

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 3, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Louisiana v. Andrew J. METOYER

NO. 2019-KO-0605

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 3, 2019

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7116

HAYWOOD ALLEN CANNON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-95-675-5-H)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Allen Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Cannon v. North Carolina, No. CA-95-675-5-H (E.D.N.C. July

8, 1996 and May 14, 1996). We deny Appellant's motions for an order

enjoining state court Judge Duke from presiding over any cases

filed by Appellant and for copies of law clerks' memoranda to the

court concerning this appeal and Appellant's prior appeals. We also

deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and for oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Rafael TRINIDAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and Department of Corrections, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-4001

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 21, 2019

Rafael Trinidad, Crestview, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee, State of Florida.

No Appearance for Department of Corrections.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Tancanekia L. COOPER v. PK MANAGEMENT I, LLC, and Summit Ridge Apartment, Ltd.

2160970

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 19, 2017 Reh. denied November 21, 2017

Dismissed.
L.M., Father of M.M., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D19-0250

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed June 7, 2019

Keith Peterson, Mulberry, for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children & Families, Children's Legal Services, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director, and Sara E. Goldfarb, Senior Attorney, of Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. www.rti.org

Using Python, PostgreSQL and R to Analyze NIBRS

With data from the Crime Data Explorer 

Ian Thomas, Dan Liao, 

Alex Harding, Alex Giarrocco 
What do we know about crime in the US?

 Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) 

– Administrative Law enforcement agency data

– Collected since 1929

 Summary Reporting System (SRS)

– Summary Statistics

– Voluntarily submitted counts of reported crimes by type of crime to the 

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

– 99% law enforcement agencies reporting as of 2015

– This system prevented certain types of crime, based on the 

characteristics of the crime, from being explicitly reported. 

 firearm violence

 crimes committed by gangs

 domestic violence

 crimes against children
NIBRS - National Incident-Based Reporting System

 National Incident-Based Reporting System

– Developed in 1980s

– Incident level reporting

– provide additional detail of each incident and allow for a broader array of crimes to be reported

– provides a level of detail and context about the crime, victim, and offender

– ~ 1/3rd law enforcement agencies reporting as of 2018
How do you access NIBRS Data?

 Published Files

– Hierarchical

 Incident granularity

 Large 

 Difficult to use

– Extract Files

 Segment granularity

 Smaller but also large

 Easier to use

– Generated from FBI released master file

– Latest Master file: 2016

 What if I want 2017 data?
Crime Data Explorer

 https://crime-data-explorer.fr.cloud.gov

 2017 available

 Released before master file

 Relational
What You Get 
Retrieving and Loading Data From CDE

 Download files

 Extract files

 Setup database

 Load files

 Log everything

 Check for errors
The CDE NIBRS Database
Using PgAdmin
The Structure of NIBRS Data
SQL Joins
Using R
Indicators

 NIBRS Data Dictionary

– Quick reference for using NIBRS Data 

– Published on the CDE

 NIBRS User Manual

– Addresses National Incident-Based 

Reporting System (NIBRS) policies, the 

types of offenses reported via NIBRS, and 

guidelines for an agency to become certified 

to submit NIBRS data to the FBI

 NIBRS Technical Specification 

– Technical details on how to submit NIBRS 

Incidents to the FBI
Analysis Views
Creating Views Using DBT
Analysis View Explorer
Future Work

 Refine analysis workflow

 Work with analysts to create more useful views

 Create views for all indicators

 Add Quality Assurance to import

 Explore using columnar databases

 Add versioning and history to database

17
Key Take Aways

 For the latest data go to:

https://crime-data-explorer.fr.cloud.gov

 Download the states and years you need

 Load the data using PostgreSQL or 

SQLite

 Use SQL to create analysis views

– Use ‘Limit 100’ to test

– Join wisely

 Remember this data will get updated
RTI International

19

Ian Thomas

ianthomas@rt.org

Dan Liao

Alex Harding

Alex Giarrocco
#### Robert Allen SARTORI, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Standly Heard; Adula Wali, a/k/a Linwood Earl Duffie; Reginald Outlaw; Melvin Harris; Larry Gary, Jr.; Gregory Gant; Natham Weaver, Plaintiffs, v. Roy COOPER; All District Attorneys in North Carolina, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-7801.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 28, 2004.

Decided May 18, 2004.

Robert Allen Sartori, Appellant pro se.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Robert Allen Sartori filed a civil action captioned under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2000). The district court concluded Sar*907tori’s claims sounded in habeas, dismissed Sartori’s claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2000), and instructed him to particularize his complaint to comply with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). Sartori’s amended complaint failed to comply with the district court’s instruction, and the district court denied relief. Sartori moved for reconsideration. The district court noted that Sartori “shows the court that his previous motion to amend actually sought to amend the relief requested” and that Sartori “argues that his claim should now be construed as a discrimination suit under §§ 1981 and 1983, and not as a petition for habeas corpus.” The district court nonetheless denied the motion for reconsideration, holding that “[r]egardless, the plaintiffs claim will still be dismissed.” Sartori appeals from the district court’s order and order on reconsideration denying relief on his amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See *Sartori v. Cooper,*No. CA-02-875-5-F (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 26, 2003; entered Sept. 29, 2003 *&*filed Oct. 23, 2003; entered Oct. 27, 2003). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
GALLEON BAY CORPORATION, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, Florida, and the State of Florida, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

No. 3D16-1502

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed September 12, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Arris T. WILLIAMS, DOC #C07689, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-2727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 10, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 1 of 9 PageID 12
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 2 of 9 PageID 13
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 3 of 9 PageID 14
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 4 of 9 PageID 15
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 5 of 9 PageID 16
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 6 of 9 PageID 17
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 7 of 9 PageID 18
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 8 of 9 PageID 19
 

 Case 3:05-cv-01376-B Document 3 Filed 07/20/05 Page 9 of 9 PageID 20
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

     The undersigned hereby makes, constitutes and appoints Karl R. Wyss, Thomas
J. Fogarty and Thomas M. Molchan, each of them acting alone, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities,
to execute and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999 of
DecisionOne Corporation and any amendments thereto pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

                                                 /s/ KIRK B. WORTMAN*

                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Kirk B. Wortman

Dated: November   ,1999

* Identical powers-of-attorney (other than the signature blocks) were executed
  by Karl R. Wyss, Lawrence M.v.D. Schloss, and Peter T. Grauer.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

y1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141501

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141501 COA: 298204 St. Clair CC: 09-002517 FH HAMIN LORENZO DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 22, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
OFFI(E?O\BOXI12308hPAP.IT©L STATIONi.AUSTJNB,T,EXAS 787,11 _„TA,_. ui i iu„ iu ^Uv.Aluu u> fcwS-'K^^S? U.b. HOSTAGE>> PITNEY BOWES STATE OF TEXAS "" *"*••-*

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

9/2/2015

JERNIGAN, GARY DEWAYNEJ

On this day, the application fori

and presented to\the Court.

ZIP 78701 02 m *r ^^•^•c=a i

0001401623SEP 10 2015'/

WR-52,610-04

Habeas Corpus has been received

Abel Acosta, Clerk

GARY DEWAYNE JERNIGAN SR.

ESTELLE UNIT - TDC #639024

264 FM 3478

HUNTSVILLE, TX 77320-3322

tfiT'F

\zfi/l1

UTF
Arthur WATERS, III, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST and Felicia A. Waters, Appellees.

Case No. 5D18-300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 30, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.