alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nelson Stark,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Nelson Stark
----------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

WILLIAM T. MASON, )

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:06-CV-0047-K

) ECF

RUIZ PROTECTIVE SERVICES, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER OF THE COURT ON RECOMMENDATION

REGARDING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Considering the record in this case and the recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, the Court hereby finds and orders that the motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal is DENIED as unnecessary because the Court previously granted

Plaintiff permission to proceed in forma pauperis in this action in December 2007. That

status carries over for purposes of Plaintiff’s appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3).

Consequently, Plaintiff may proceed with his appeal in forma pauperis. 

The Court notes that the pro se plaintiff in this action did not personally sign the

motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

indicates that the Court should provide an opportunity to correct such deficiency before

striking the motion. Because the prior grant of in forma pauperis status carries over for

Plaintiff’s appeal, a properly signed motion is unnecessary, and the Court will not strike

the instant motion.
Further, In support of this court’s order (Doc. No. 137) granting plaintiff’s

motion for production of a trial transcript at government expense, the court hereby

certifies that the appeal is not frivolous but presents a substantial question. See 28

U.S.C. § 753(f). The trial transcript will be needed for use by the 5 Circuit Court of th

Appeals in deciding the appeal that was filed in this case on July 23, 2008.

SO ORDERED.

Signed: August 14 , 2008 th

 

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**













In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal,
      President, Chief Executive Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of
      Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.








*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Executive Officer


January
      17, 2005






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**













In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NSM Holdings, Inc. (“NSM”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuber Jamal, Chief
      Financial Officer of NSM and sole member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of NSM.








*/s/
      Zuber Jamal*


Zuber
      Jamal


Chief
      Financial Officer


January
      17, 2005
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ *Julianna                  Lu*                                                                    |   |   |   |
|  Julianna                  LuChief                  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |   |   |

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Shon P. SHAW

No. 2019-KH-0411

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, his sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030.

Applicant has now fully litigated another application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Crichton, J., recused.
Order entered October 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00208-CV

WILLIE G. COOKS, Appellant

V.

DISCOVER BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-12257

ORDER

By postcard dated March 13, 2013, the court reporter was directed to file the reporter’s 

record within thirty days of the date of the notice. To date, the reporter has not filed the record 

or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, we ORDER Deana K. Savage, 

Official Court Reporter of the 95th Judicial District Court, to file the record within thirty days of 

the date of this order. If no record exists or if a record exists but appellant has not requested it or 

paid or made arrangements to pay for it, Ms. Savage shall inform the Court in writing within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order. No extension will be granted absent exigent circumstances. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order by electronic 

transmission to Ms. Savage and the Honorable Ken Molberg, Presiding Judge of the 95th Judicial
District Court.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
EX-10.17



 Exhibit 10.17 
  





 
  

2015 Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Bonus Plan 

PURPOSE: The BlackLine (“Company”) CEO Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is designed to incentivize the achievement of
BlackLine’s strategic priorities through compensation that that supports overall excellence in job performance in accordance with BlackLine business objectives and goals. 

DEFINITIONS: 
 For the purpose of the Plan, the
following definitions apply: 
 a. “Free Cash Flow” (“FCF”): A measure of financial performance calculated after
accounting for capital expenditures. 
 b. “Net Bookings”: Refers to the total value of accepted term contracts, contracted work or
services, and changes to such contracts as of either the order date or the effective date of the transaction. Bookings typically include all items with a revenue implication, such as new contracts, renewals, upgrades, downgrades, add-ons, early
terminations and refunds. 
 c. “Participant”: Chief Legal Officer. 

PLAN DESIGN: 
 The bonus payment is discretionary,
subject to assessment of overall individual performance and approval by the Chief Executive Officer. 
 The eligible earning rate is 40% of the
participant’s annual salary at the time of payout – equivalent to $120,000. 
 The Bonus Plan is contingent upon the Company meeting specific
financial goals and thresholds, as determined by the Board of Directors. 
 For 2015, the company must meet pre-established FCF thresholds and vesting
schedule is proportionate to the following achievement of revenue goals:
  

	 	•	 	Plan begins to vest at 80% Net Bookings achievement. 

  

	 	•	 	Once 80% Net Bookings have been met, the Plan pays out at 50%. 

  

	 	•	 	At 100% Net Bookings achievement, the Plan is fully vested at 100%. 

  

	 	•	 	The 2015 Plan is capped at 100% payout. 


  
 1 









 



 
  
  

 ELIGIBILITY: 
  

	 	•	 	Discretionary to CEO approval of performance in role. The participant must be an active, full-time employee and not participating in an Individual Compensation Program. 


PAYMENT OF BONUSE: 
  

	 	•	 	Bonus payment, if earned, is targeted for distribution in March 2016. 

  

	 	•	 	Bonus amounts are subject to government required withholding payments/deductions. 

  

	 	•	 	All bonus calculations are based on the employee’s regular 2015 earnings, which excludes OT, commissions, bonus, etc. 


PARTICIPANT ACKNOWLEDGMENT 
 I
acknowledge that I have carefully read, understand and agree to the provisions of the BlackLine CLO Bonus Plan (the “Plan”). I understand and agree that the Plan is not intended to, and does not, alter the at-will employment relationship
that exists between the Company and me. I further understand and acknowledge that the Board of Directors is free to amend, modify or eliminate the Plan, in whole or in part, at any time in its sole discretion. 

 

									
		 		 	
					
	Employee Name:	 	Karole Morgan-Prager	 		 		 	
	Signature:	 	/s/ Karole Morgan-Prager	 		 	Date:	 	 12-29-15



  
 2
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: April 4, 2008  /s/ Cosmo PalmieriChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 HORIZON LINES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Lines, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ CHARLES G. RAYMONDCharles G. RaymondPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 99.8****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**     We hereby consent to the use of our audit report dated February 3, 2006 on the consolidatedbalance sheets of Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. as at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidatedstatements of earnings, deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2005 which is incorporated by reference in its (i) Annual Report on Form 40-F ofAbitibi-Consolidated Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, (ii) Registration Statementon Form S-8 (File No. 333-103697), (iii) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-14184)and (iv) Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-123117) each filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission.(signed) *PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 32 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services relating to ``Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Omnibus 
               COVID-19 Health Care Staff Vaccination''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating 
to ``Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Omnibus COVID-19 Health Care Staff 
Vaccination'' (86 Fed. Reg. 61555 (November 5, 2021)), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the Senate March 2, 2022.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 32

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services relating to ``Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Omnibus 
               COVID-19 Health Care Staff Vaccination''.
```
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL;

REGINALD ENTO; JEFFREY

PATRICK LYONS, Jr.; AAKASH

DESAI, on behalf of themselves and

others similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney

General; EVA STEINBERGER,

Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA

Programs, California Department of

Justice,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-15152

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-04779-CRB

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

In light of Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. ___ , No. 12-207 (June 3, 2013) and

the parties’ supplemental briefs, this case will be re-argued before the en banc

court during the week of December 9, 2013, in San Francisco, California. The date

and time will be determined by separate order. For further information or special

FILED

AUG 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
page 2

requests regarding scheduling, please contact Deputy Clerk Paul Keller at

paul_keller@ca9.uscourts.gov or (415) 355-8026. 

The court grants leave pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 29(a) to any amicus

wishing to file a brief bearing on the issues to be re-argued, so long as it is filed no

later than October 28, 2013, and does not exceed 2,500 words.
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 24 PageID 9037
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 2 of 24 PageID 9038
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 3 of 24 PageID 9039
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 4 of 24 PageID 9040
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 5 of 24 PageID 9041
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 6 of 24 PageID 9042
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 7 of 24 PageID 9043
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 8 of 24 PageID 9044
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 9 of 24 PageID 9045
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 10 of 24 PageID 9046
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 11 of 24 PageID 9047
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 12 of 24 PageID 9048
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 13 of 24 PageID 9049
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 14 of 24 PageID 9050
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 15 of 24 PageID 9051
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 16 of 24 PageID 9052
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 17 of 24 PageID 9053
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 18 of 24 PageID 9054
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 19 of 24 PageID 9055
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 20 of 24 PageID 9056
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 21 of 24 PageID 9057
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 22 of 24 PageID 9058
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 23 of 24 PageID 9059
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 318 Filed 04/25/13 Page 24 of 24 PageID 9060
Regina JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D19-211

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 25, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                             18,710
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     553,358
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  588,685
<PP&E>                            450,667
<DEPRECIATION>                   (110,104)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,378,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,620,322
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           59,597
<OTHER-SE>                      1,510,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,378,510
<SALES>                         8,321,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                8,328,377
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   8,536,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 54,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (262,505)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (262,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (262,505)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>