alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Alexandra HOFFMAN, individually, and Your Sacred Space, LLC, Appellants, v. STEWART AGENCY, INC. d/b/a Earl Stewart Toyota of North Palm Beach, Appellee.

No. 4D18-2017

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 16, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Case 2:06-cv-00018-J Document 11 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 40
|   | · | Registration      Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-137691) and related Prospectus      of  ABN AMRO Bank N.V. pertaining to the issuance of up to USD      2,500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of debt    securities; |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Registration      Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-104778) and related Prospectus of ABN AMRO      Holding N.V., ABN AMRO Bank N.V., ABN AMRO Capital Funding Trusts V-IX,      and ABN AMRO Capital Funding LLCs V-IX pertaining to the issuance of up to      USD 6,478,380,000 aggregate amount of the securities listed in the      Prospectus; |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Registration      Statement (Form F-4 No. 333-108304) and related Prospectus of ABN AMRO      Bank N.V. and ABN AMRO Holding N.V. pertaining to the offer to exchange      USD 500,000,000 subordinated notes due2018. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                         PLEDGE AGREEMENT CONFIRMATION

         Reference is made to that certain Pledge Agreement (the "Agreement")
dated June 29, 2001 from The J. Jill Group, Inc. to Citizens Bank of
Massachusetts ("Citizens") individually and as Agent for the benefit of, and on
behalf of, all Lenders, as such term is defined in that certain Fifth Amended
and Restated Loan Agreement between The J. Jill Group, Inc. on the one hand, and
the several financial institutions from time to time party thereto (Citizens
Bank of Massachusetts being one of them) and Citizens Bank of Massachusetts as
Agent on behalf of the Lenders, on the other hand, dated as of June 29, 2001, as
amended as of August 28, 2001, July 25, 2002, June 26, 2003 and as the same may
hereafter be amended (collectively, the "Pledge Agreement"). The undersigned
hereby confirms to Citizens individually and as Agent that the Pledge Agreement
(i) remains in full force and effect; (ii) is valid, binding and enforceable
against the undersigned and the undersigned's successors and assigns in
accordance with its terms; and (iii) continues to secure all "Obligations" as
therein defined.

         Executed as an instrument under seal as of this 26 day of June, 2003.

                                     THE J. JILL GROUP, INC.

                                     By: /s/ Linda L. Trudel
                                         -------------------

                                     Name: Linda L. Trudel
                                           ---------------

                                     Title: Vice President/Corporate Controller
                                            -----------------------------------
Case 3:06-cv-00271-B Document 696 Filed 02/06/09 Page 1 of 1 PageID 19459
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RICHARD BORQUIST, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RAJAE NINO, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 17-cv-00068-BLF 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE LLOYD, 

GRANTING APPLICATION TO 

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND 

REMANDING ACTION TO 

MONTEREY COUNTY SUPERIOR 

COURT 

On January 9, 2017, Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd in his Report and 

Recommendation (“R&R”) determined that Defendant Rajae Nino’s application to proceed in 

forma pauperis should be granted and that this unlawful detainer action should be remanded to 

state court. See ECF 4. No objections have been filed by Defendant. 

When a party makes no objection to an R&R, the Court reviews it for clear error or 

manifest injustice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). After conducting an appropriate review, the Court may 

“accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the 

magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court has reviewed and thoroughly considered 

Judge Lloyd’s R&R. 

First, having considered the application to proceed in forma pauperis and the complaint, 

the Court hereby GRANTS Nino’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Next, as for the recommendation to remand the case, the Court notes that Nino, as the party 

seeking removal, bears the burden of demonstrating subject matter jurisdiction. The Court 

concludes that there is no federal jurisdiction in the instant case for several reasons. One is that 

the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 (FPFA) has expired and does not apply to the 

Case 5:17-cv-00068-BLF Document 6 Filed 01/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

asserted claims. Fairview Tasman LLC v. Young, No. 15-CV-05493-LHK, 2016 WL 199060, at 

*2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2016). Another is that PTFA has no express or implied private right of 

action. Logan v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 722 F.3d 1163, 1170-73 (9th Cir. 2013). Lastly, the 

PTFA is not an essential element of Plaintiff’s claim. Thus, this Court does not have subject 

matter jurisdiction over this action. 

Finding the R&R correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, the Court adopts it in every 

respect. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis and the above-titled unlawful detainer action is REMANDED to Monterey County 

Superior Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 27, 2017 

 ______________________________________ 

BETH LABSON FREEMAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:17-cv-00068-BLF Document 6 Filed 01/27/17 Page 2 of 2
K.S. v. A.J.

2170230

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

February 12, 2018

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2
         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Davinder Bains, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Northwest
Productions Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
    material information relating to Pacific Northwest Productions
    Inc., including its subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us
    by others within those entities, particularly during the period
    in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
    of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
    our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or
    operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our
    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
    and have further advised our auditors that there we are not aware
    of any material weaknesses in our internal controls; and

b)  that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved
    our management or other employees who have a significant role in
    our internal controls; and

6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation.

                                   PACIFIC NORTHWEST PRODUCTIONS INC.,
                                   Registrant

Dated: June 27, 2005              /s/ Davinder Bains
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   By: Davinder Bains, Chief Financial
                                   Officer, Treasurer and Principal
                                   Accounting Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

BERNARD RENA CLEMONS, 1054384, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) No. 3:05-CV-1930-N

) ECF

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, )

Director TDCJ-CID, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the

Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Signed November 17, 2006.

_________________________________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01930-N Document 12 Filed 11/17/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 71
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) NO. CR 17-00005 CRB 

) 

10 Plaintiff, 

11 v. 

12 WILLIE WILEY, JR., 

13 Defendant. 

) [PROPOSED]ORDER 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) ______________________________ ) 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Date: 

Leave is granted to the government to dismiss without prejudice the indictment. 

HON.CHARLESR.BREYER 

United States Senior District Judge 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL (CR 17-00005 CRB) 

June 9, 2017
Laila VANDERPOOL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Alvin DHALU, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0919

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 08, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
EX PARTE James JACKSON

CR-16-1130

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE FRANK MARDEUSZ,

Appellant,

v.

,

Appellee.

Case No. 17-cv-00063-CRB 

RE: IN RE FRANK MARDEUSZ

Bankruptcy Case: 16-31204

Adversary No.:

BAP No.:

Appellant: FRANK MARDEUSZ

The appeal has been assigned the following case number, 17-cv-00063-CRBbefore the 

Honorable Charles R. Breyer .

When the parties have perfected the record on appeal in accordance with the federal and local 

bankruptcy rules, the Bankruptcy Court will transmit to this court either the record or a notice that 

the record is available electronically. 

Pursuant to the federal and local bankruptcy rules, unless the assigned District Judge orders 

otherwise, briefs in this matter shall be due in accordance with the following schedule:

Appellant’s principal brief: no more than 30 days after docketing of notice that the record has 

been transmitted or is available electronically on the District Court’s docket.

Appellee’s principal and response brief: no more than 30 days after service of appellant's brief. 

If the appellee has filed a cross-appeal, the brief of appellee shall contain both the issues and 

arguments pertinent to the cross-appeal and the response to the appellant’s brief.

Appellant’s response and reply brief: no more than 30 days after service of appellee’s brief. 

Appellee’s reply brief: no more than14 days after service of the appellant’s response and reply 

brief, but also no more than 7 days before scheduled argument.

Briefs shall be in compliance with Bankruptcy Rules 8014-8018, as applicable.

Case 3:17-cv-00063-CRB Document 2 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Pursuant to B.L.R 8019-1, upon completion of the briefing, the assigned District Judge will set a 

date for oral argument, unless the judge determines that oral argument is unnecessary under the 

Bankruptcy Local Rules; in that case, the matter will be deemed submitted for decision.

Dated: 1/5/2017 For the Court

Susan Y. Soong, Clerk

By: Simone Voltz

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:17-cv-00063-CRB Document 2 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 2
Wilber RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D19-740

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 22, 2019

Wilber Rodriguez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, MILLER, and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 7
 RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
 IFRS Excl. 32/39
    
    IFRS
    
    IFRS
    
    IFRS
    
    IFRS2004
    
    2005
    
    2006
    
    2007
    
    2008Total interest expense from the banking operations
    
    
    16,707
    
    
    
    39,109
    
    
    
    49,978
    
    
    
    67,773
    
    
    
    85,969Other interest expenses
    
    
    1,019
    
    
    
    969
    
    
    
    1,016
    
    
    
    1,102
    
    
    
    978Interest credited on investment contracts and
universal life-type contracts (FAS 97)
    
    
    3,809
    
    
    
    5,453
    
    
    
    5,084
    
    
    
    2,879
    
    
    
    (709
    )Total interest expense
    
    
    21,535
    
    
    
    45,531
    
    
    
    56,078
    
    
    
    71,754
    
    
    
    86,238Capitalized interest during construction
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1Total Charges
    
    
    21,535
    
    
    
    45,531
    
    
    
    56,080
    
    
    
    71,754
    
    
    
    86,239Dividend in preference shares
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Dividend in preference shares  TIER1 capital
    
    
    136
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total Charges inclusive Dividend in preference shares
    
    
    21,685
    
    
    
    45,531
    
    
    
    56,080
    
    
    
    71,754
    
    
    
    86,239Pre tax profit
    
    
    7,740
    
    
    
    8,894
    
    
    
    9,940
    
    
    
    11,042
    
    
    
    (1,486
    )Total interest expense
    
    
    21,535
    
    
    
    45,531
    
    
    
    56,078
    
    
    
    71,754
    
    
    
    86,239Losses from investments
accounted under the
equity method
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (469
    )Total
    
    
    29,268
    
    
    
    54,422
    
    
    
    66,015
    
    
    
    82,793
    
    
    
    84,284Earnings to Fixed Charges:Including Interest on Deposits
    
    
    1.36
    
    
    
    1.20
    
    
    
    1.18
    
    
    
    1.15
    
    
    
    0.98Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
Dividend:Including Interest on Deposits
    
    
    1.35
    
    
    
    1.20
    
    
    
    1.18
    
    
    
    1.15
    
    
    
    0.98
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, David R. Malmstedt, Chief Executive Officer of Vincera, Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vincera, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instruction contained in SEC Release 34-47986]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May 15, 2007  /s/ David R. Malmstedt Name: David R. Malmstedt Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)     1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer, Director and President and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marquee
Holdings Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended July 1, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:
August 10, 2010

/s/ GERARDO I. LOPEZ Gerardo I. Lopez Chief Executive Officer, Director and President/s/ CRAIG R. RAMSEYCraig R. Ramsey
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Marquee Holdings Inc. and will be retained by
Marquee Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---



QuickLinks
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1757

___________ Ibrahim Traore, * * Petitioner, * Petition for Review of an * Order of the Board of v. * Immigration Appeals. * John Ashcroft, Attorney General * [UNPUBLISHED] of the United States, * * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: August 25, 2004 Filed: August 31, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ibrahim Traore petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of Traore’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. After careful review of the record, we conclude the BIA’s decision on Traore’s asylum application is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Menendez-Donis v. Ashcroft , 360 F.3d 915, 918-19 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). Specifically, the IJ discredited Traore’s testimony about past persecution he suffered because Traore failed to raise political persecution in a previous asylum application and his explanation for failing to do so was unconvincing, and he failed to present-2- documentary evidence to support his allegations. We defer to the IJ’s credibility finding because it was supported by specific, cogent reasons for disbelief. See Nyama v. Ashcroft , 357 F.3d 812, 817 (8th Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (deference standard). In addition, we find because Traore failed to meet the burden of proof on his asylum claim, he failed to meet the higher burden for withholding of removal. See Francois v. INS , 283 F.3d 926, 932-33 (8th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we deny Traore’s petition.

______________________________