alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Shane HARDISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1532

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 8, 2019

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Kime, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*1231The defendant appeals his revocation of probation, judgment, and sentence rendered in case numbers 11-003397CF10A (the "2011 case") and 16-00894CF10A (the "2016 case"), raising six issues for our consideration. We affirm the defendant's judgment and sentence in both cases and write only to address his arguments that the trial court erred by (1) failing to enter a written order of revocation of probation stating the basis for revocation; and (2) miscalculating his credit for time served.

First, as the state concedes, the trial court erred when it failed to enter a written order in both cases stating the specific grounds for revocation of probation. *See* *King v. State* , 46 So.3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ("If a trial court revokes a defendant's probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated."). Second, as the state concedes, the trial court miscalculated the defendant's credit for time served in both cases. The parties agree that the defendant is entitled to 526 days of jail credit in the 2016 case, but disagree regarding the amount of jail credit to be awarded in the 2011 case, and the defendant's entitlement to post-sentencing credit. Section 921.161(1), (2), Florida Statutes (2018), "requires the trial court to determine and give credit for all time spent in county jail prior to sentencing and for the Department [of Corrections] to calculate the time after sentencing, including time in the county jail after sentencing." *Kitchen v. State* , 20 So.3d 975, 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Relief sought for "jail time spent after sentencing must be sought through administrative proceedings with the Department of Corrections." *Stokes v. State* , 851 So.2d 788, 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Thus, as the state argues, the trial court was not required to award the defendant jail credit for time served post-sentencing, so that the defendant is entitled to 1,103 days of jail credit for time served in the 2011 case. To the extent the defendant believes he is entitled to additional credit for the jail time he served after sentencing on the 2011 case, he must seek relief through administrative proceedings with the Department of Corrections. *See* *id* .

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of the defendant's probation, and his sentences in both cases, but remand with instructions for the trial court to (1) enter written orders of revocation of probation setting forth the reasons for the revocation; and (2) award the defendant 1,103 days of jail credit on the 2011 case and 526 days of jail credit on the 2016 case, *nunc pro tunc* to April 19, 2018, the day of sentencing.

Warner, Gross and Forst, JJ., concur.
R.W. v. Calhoun County DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160700

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Valley Commerce Bancorp (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of Donald A. Gilles, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Roy
O. Estridge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: August 14, 2009
/s/ Donald A. GillesDonald A. GillesPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 14, 2009
/s/ Roy O. EstridgeRoy O. EstridgeChief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1
 HORIZON LINES, INC.
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Lines, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ CHARLES G. RAYMONDCharles G. RaymondPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Chasity Summer MAY, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Christopher Seth Denison v. Barbara NOGUCHI, M.D.

NO. 2019-CC-0474

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 51 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 51

       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 2617.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 22, 2022

  Mr. Leahy submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
       Providing for a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 2617.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of H.R. 2617, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) Amend the title so as to read: ``Making consolidated 
        appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023, 
        and for providing emergency assistance for the situation in 
        Ukraine, and for other purposes.''.
            (2) Strike the first section 1 immediately following the 
        enacting clause and all that follows through the end of the 
        first section 2, up to and including ``under subsection (b)(5) 
        for that agency''.
            (3) In title IV of division O, strike section 403.
            (4) Strike the final section 3 and all that follows through 
        the end.
                                 <all>
```
Breanna Jean JOHNSON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Joseph Brendan JOHNSON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-1334

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Mark BODGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D18-3995

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 1, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Keene v. State*, 500 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) ; *Harris v. State*, 483 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Best practices for 

monitoring and evaluating the 

ARP, IIJA and other programs: 

Report of the 

Department of Commerce 

Data Governance Working Group

October 25, 2022

Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology 

Ben Page, Department of Commerce

1
Agenda

1 Executive summary, roadmap, and recommendations

2 Census Bureau’s Data Linkage Infrastructure for program evaluation

3 Data needs from an implementing bureau’s perspective

6 Discussion

2

5 Next steps from Chief Data Officer’s perspective

4 Partnership in action: Expanding broadband access (bonus 

presentation!)
Panelists

• Ben Page, Director, Commerce Implementation and Coordination Office, 

Department of Commerce

• Ron Jarmin, Deputy Director, U.S. Census Bureau

• Carla Medalia, Assistant Division Chief for Business Development, U.S. 

Census Bureau

• Ryan Smith, Policy Advisor for the Office of Regional Affairs, Economic 

Development Administration

• Whitney Duffey Jones, Deputy Director, Commerce Implementation and 

Coordination Office, Department of Commerce

• Oliver Wise, Chief Data Officer, Department of Commerce

3
D.B. v. L.S.

2170234

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 4, 2018

Dismissed.
# Journal officiel C 194I/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l’Union européenne | C 194I |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 66e année2 juin 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l’Union européenne

C 194I

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

66e année2 juin 2023

---

| Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Comité économique et social européen |
| 2023/C 194 I/01 | Avis rectificatif à l’avis de vacance d’emploi no 16/T/23 concernant l’emploi de secrétaire général(e) au secrétariat du Comité économique et social européen [publication selon l’article 2, point a), et l’article 8 du régime applicable aux autres agents de l’Union européenne]
  ( JO C 178 A du 22.5.2023 ) | 1 |

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Comité économique et social européen

2023/C 194 I/01

Avis rectificatif à l’avis de vacance d’emploi no 16/T/23 concernant l’emploi de secrétaire général(e) au secrétariat du Comité économique et social européen [publication selon l’article 2, point a), et l’article 8 du régime applicable aux autres agents de l’Union européenne]
  ( JO C 178 A du 22.5.2023 )

o

[publication selon l’article 2, point a), et l’article 8 du régime applicable aux autres agents de l’Union européenne]

( JO C 178 A du 22.5.2023 )

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Comité économique et social européen

| 2.6.2023 | FR | Journal officiel de l’Union européenne | CI 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2023

FR

Journal officiel de l’Union européenne

CI 194/1

---

Avis rectificatif à l’avis de vacance d’emploi no 16/T/23 concernant l’emploi de secrétaire général(e) au secrétariat du Comité économique et social européen

[publication selon l’article 2, point a), et l’article 8 du régime applicable aux autres agents de l’Union européenne]

(
  «Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» C 178 A du 22 mai 2023
  )

(2023/C 194 I/01)

Page 3, au point 3, b), ii), «Expérience professionnelle requise»:

au lieu de:

«Après avoir obtenu les qualifications visées au point 3 b) i), les personnes candidates doivent avoir acquis au minimum quinze ans (en équivalent temps plein) d’expérience professionnelle de niveau postuniversitaire, dont au moins sept dans des fonctions d’encadrement.»,

lire:

«Après avoir obtenu les qualifications visées au point 3 b) i), les personnes candidates doivent avoir acquis au minimum quinze ans (en équivalent temps plein) d’expérience professionnelle de niveau postuniversitaire, dont au moins sept dans des fonctions d’encadrement supérieur.».

---
K.T. v. LIMESTONE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160893

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

January 5, 2018

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRANSITO PORTILLO-DURAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-73309

Agency No. A095-024-689

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 22, 2015** 

Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Transito Portillo-Duran, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for

FILED

APR 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

dismiss the petition for review.

The IJ denied Portillo-Duran’s withholding of removal claim on the basis

that he failed to demonstrate a nexus to race, religion, political opinion, or other

protected ground. The BIA found that, in his counseled appeal, Portillo-Duran did

not challenge the IJ’s nexus finding. Thus, we lack jurisdiction over any challenge

to the IJ’s nexus finding. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.

2004) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the

BIA). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 10-73309
NUMBER 13-02-00333-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

IN RE: HISPANIC TELEVISION NETWORK, INC.

_____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This petition for writ of mandamus was abated by this Court on August 8, 2002, due

to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally

TEX. R. APP. P. 8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this proceeding. On

January 15, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file a status advisory and, if applicable,

a motion to reinstate or a motion to dismiss. The order notified the parties that failure to

respond to the order would result in reinstatement and dismissal for want of prosecution.
2

The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate the original

mandamus proceeding and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 12th day of March, 2009.
Exhibit 31.1I, Richard L. Federico, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: February 15, 2006 /s/ RICHARD L. FEDERICO   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer     
62
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Edward C. Dillon, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Edward C. Dillon
-----------------------------
Edward C. Dillon
Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2010


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Nelson Stark, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Nelson Stark
-----------------------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2010
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1414

___________

Japhus L. Dooley, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Boyoni, Ms., Disciplinary Hearing * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Officer; Marvin Evans, Warden, East *

Arkansas Regional Unit; Robert Clark, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, *

Pine Bluff Central Office, Arkansas *

Department of Correction, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 5, 2000

 Filed: 

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable

John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas.

-2-

Japhus Dooley appeals the district court’s1 dismissal under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(a) of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After a careful review of the record,

we conclude the district court did not err in dismissing the complaint. We deny

Dooley’s pending motion.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
John David BURT v. Faye Lynn BURT

2170507

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 23, 2018

Dismissed.