alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Our Glass, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Cosmo Palmieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  May 11, 2009 /s/Cosmo Palmieri     Chief Executive Officer
Supporting the Federal 

Statistical System through 

the ASA 

FCSM, Steve Pierson, Director of Science Policy 

October 26, 2023

1
ASA Overview

Centrality of federal statistics to ASA

Array of support

How to get involved

Discussion/questions

Outline

2
ASA: Promoting the Practice and Profession of 

Statistics

• Founded in 1839 -- 1840 Census

• 14,000+ members in industry, academia, government; 80+ 

countries

• Professional association: meetings, publications, membership 

services, education, accreditation, awards, fellows, advocacy. 

• The primary organizational entities of the ASA

• 72 committees: awards, fellows, publications, education, relationships 

with other organizations, professional issues, etc.

• 30 sections: research interests

• 60 chapters: geographical (also outreach & interest groups, student 

chapters) 3
ASA: Government sector foundational to ASA 

• Founded in 1839 around Decennial Census concerns

• Every third President and VP from government sector

• 2023: Dionne Price; VPs: Matilde Sanchez-Kam and Jenny Thompson

• Previously: Robert Santos, Wendy Martinez, Barry Nussbaum, Lisa 

LaVange, ... 

• Seek govt sector members on ASA committees

• Government Statistics Section, Social Statistics Section, ... 

• Washington Statistical Society

• Major focus of ASA advocacy 4
How ASA supports FSS: publications

5
How ASA supports 

FSS: Meetings

6
How ASA 

supports FSS: 

Career • Jobs • Professional 

Development

• Announcements • Webinars • Networking

7
How ASA 

supports FSS: 

Career • Jobs • Professional 

Development

• Announcements • Webinars • Networking

8
How ASA supports FSS: Public Awareness

9
How ASA 

supports FSS: 

Public 

Awareness

10
How ASA 

supports 

FSS: 

Monitoring

11
How ASA 

supports 

FSS: 

Proactive 

Monitoring

12

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation 

funding to assess health of the 

federal statistical agencies

Connie Citro, Nancy Potok, Claire Bowen, 

Jonathan Auerbach, May Aydin, Zach 

Seeskin, Steve Pierson

http://bit.ly/AssessingFedStatHealth
How ASA supports 

FSS: advocacy

• Budgets

• Resources

• Autonomy

• Comments on Federal Register 

Notices

13
ASA: How to 

get involved

Participate! ASA is a volunteer-run 

organization • Section, committee, or WSS • Meetings • Articles/publications • Professional development • Share news/announcements • Help with recognition: awards 

and fellows

Engage on social media

14
ASA 

advocacy: 

How to 

support

• Join Count on Stats on LinkedIn

• Make us aware of issues

• Help us make the case

• Consider/explore awareness 

building with your Member of 

Congress 

15
Thank You! 

Questions?

spierson@amstat.org

16
In re Jovan

ValdillezAppellant/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 13, 2014

No. 04-14-00090-CV

IN RE Jovan VALDILLEZ

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On February 7, 2014, relator filed an original pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the

relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on February 13th, 2014.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of February, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2001EM502490, styled In the Interest of K.N.G., A Child, pending in the

288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jim Rausch presiding.

FILE COPY
James ST. HILARE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2216

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 13, 2019

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Franklin v. State*, 258 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 2018) ; *State v. Michel*, 257 So.3d 3 (Fla. 2018).
Decarlo Antuann MITCHELL, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-3270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 2019

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornell Niles, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Barrett Wakefield and Howard Wakefield III v. Sam Ayers and 

Claudia Ayers

Appellate case number: 01-14-00648-CV

Trial court case number: 1007580-102

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

Date motion filed: October 14, 2016

Party filing motion: Appellant Barrett Wakefield

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland

Date: November 8, 2016
# C_2020399EN.01003601.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/36

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 September 2020 — Datax v REA

(Case T-381/20 R)

(Interim measures - Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Reimbursement of sums paid - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2020/C 399/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Datax sp. z o.o. (Wroclaw, Poland) (represented by: J. Bober, lawyer)

Defendant: Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by M. Le Berre, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of REA measure Ares(2019) 7018535 of 13 November 2019 concerning project 261659 (HELP) and project 286822 (GreenNets), concerning rejection and recovery of eligible costs and debit notes issued on the basis of that measure.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2018112EN.01001501.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 14 December 2017 — Unareti SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Others

(Case C-702/17)

(2018/C 112/20)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Unareti SpA

Appellants:

Respondents: Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri — Dipartimento per gli Affari Regionali, Autorità Garante per l’Energia Elettrica il Gas e il Sistema Idrico — Sede di Milano, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri — Conferenza Stato Regioni ed Unificata, Ministero per gli affari regionali, Dipartimento per gli affari regionali e le autonomie, Conferenza Unificata Stato Regioni e Enti Locali

Respondents:

Questions referred

Questions referred

In particular, the Court is asked to establish whether those principles and laws preclude national legislation, as described above, that provides for retrospective application of criteria for determining the amount of the reimbursements payable to former concession holders, thus affecting previous contractual relationships, or whether the application of those criteria can be justified, including in view of the proportionality principle, by the requirement of protecting other public interests of European importance, relating to the necessity of improving protection for competition within the market in question and of giving greater protection to service users, who could indirectly bear the cost of an increase in the sums payable to former concession holders.

---
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum M a jority and Dissenting Opinion s filed Ju l y 15 , 2021 .

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 21
- 00154
- CV

IN RE DOJO BAY HOUSE, LLC , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 151st District Co u rt Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019
- 60692


### MEMORANDUM DISSENTIN G OPINION Relator has not provided a n origi n al

- pro c eeding record that complies with the mandatory requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52. 7 , which is a condition p r e cedent to this court de termin ing the original proceeding on th e merits. See Code Construction Act, Tex. Gov ’ t Code Ann. § 311.016( 3) ( defining “ must ” ) ; Tex. R. App. P. 52.7 ; In re Kholaif , N os . 14

- 20

- 00731

- CV & 14

- 20

- 00732

- CV , 2020 WL 7013339 , at *1

– 4 (T e x . App.

— Houston [14th Di st.] Nov. 25, 2020 ,2

order ) 1 , disp. , 615 S.W.3d 369, 370 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2020 ) (orig. proceeding)

. Th e court should have notified r e lator of the procedu ral i ssue with the original

- proceeding record so that it could b e cured

. Se e Kholaif , 202 0 WL 7013339 , at * 1 , 615 S.W.3d at 370

. The court did not, which i s a due

- process and due

- course
- of

- law issue

. Se e In re Pena , 619 S.W.3d 837 , 839 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 202 1 ) (orig. proceeding) ( Bourliot, J., dissenting) ; K holaif , 2020 WL 70133 39 , at * 3

. I d i ssent to the co urt not notifying the relator of the procedural issue with the record and de nying the petiti on on the merits without a proper record

. I express no opinion on the merits of the petition for writ of mandam u s
.

/s/ Charles A. Spa in Justice

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Ch r i stopher and Justices Spa in and Wilson. ( Christopher, C.J., majority)

.

1 Westlaw incorrect l y states t ha t th e November 25, 2020 interlocut o ry order and dissent “ ha s not been released for pu blication in the permanent law reports . Until released, it is subje ct to revision or withdrawal

. ”
Deandre Demille TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-1247

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2019]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 3:05-cv-01928-M Document 62 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Michael D'AGOSTINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-2032

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 24, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
RTI International

RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. www.rti.org

Two (Not So) Different Approaches 

for Dealing with Survey Nonresponse 

That Is Not Missing at Random 

Phillip S. Kott
RTI International

Outline

Developing My Favorite Equation 

The Outcome (Prediction) Model with Ignorable Nonresponse

The Response (Quasi-random) Model with Missingness at Random

The Response Model with Missingness Not at Random

The Outcome Model with Nonignorable Nonresponse 

The Pattern Mixture Model 

Discussion 
RTI International

Developing My Favorite Equation

Bias from Nonresponse Under Simple Random Sampling:

Bias = ∑kk∈RR

yykk

rr − ∑kk∈SS

yykk

nn

= ∑kk∈SS

RRkk−rr

nn yykk

rr

=

∑kk∈SS

RRkk−rr

nn

rr yykk − yy� = ∑kk∈SS

1

nn

RRkk−rr

nn

rr

nn

yykk − yy� .

Adding weights (ddkk =

1⁄ππkk

∑ii∈SS1⁄ππii

):

Bias =∑kk∈SS

ddkk

RRkk−EE�(RRkk)

EE�(RRkk) yykk − yy� .
RTI International

Developing My Favorite Equation (2)

Bias =∑kk∈SS

ddkk

RRkk−EE�(RRkk)

EE�(RRkk) yykk − yy�

=∑kk∈SS

ddkk

RRkk

EE�(RRkk) − 1 yykk − yy�

=∑kkεSS ddkk RRkkggkk − 1 yykk − zzkk

TTδδ ,

where ggkk = 1⁄EE�(RRkk), and the calibration equation: 

∑kkεSS ddkkRRkkggkkzzkk = ∑kkεSS ddkkzzkk holds. 
RTI International

An Example


RTI International

The Outcome Model

The estimator ∑kkεε ddkkRRkkggkkyykk is nearly unbiased in some sense

when the output model with ignorable nonresponse holds:

yykk= zzkk

TTββ + εkk; E( εkk|zzkk, RRkk) = 0,

and ggkk= 1/ EE�(RRkk) can be any function of zk,

but not yk|zk .

For example: 

ggkk = 1 + ∑iiεε ddiizzii

TT ∑iiεε ddiiRRiizziiTT ∑iiεε ddiiRRiizziizziiTT −1

zzkk
RTI International


RTI International



The Response Model
RTI International



Missing (Not) at Random
RTI International



Nonignorable Nonresponse
RTI International

Pattern-Mixture Modeling
RTI International



Discussion
RTI International

Often the vector of calibration variables contains totals (or means) 

for the entire population, as well as estimated totals (or means) for 

the sample before nonresponse. 

SUDAAN’s calibration-weighting PROCs can handle either, but not 

both.

What is the purpose of the design (inverse probability) weights?

They are like the 1/R(xk), except they don’t have to be estimated, 

but we do not know if the are functions of the yk.

Discussion
RTI International

Suppose we gave a random fraction of the probability sample an incentive 

to respond. 

Let ck = 1 if k gets the incentive, 0 otherwise. 

Calibrating to the full sample: 

Let the new zk vector be 

zzkk

oooooo

cckkzzkk

oooooo

yykk(cckk − cc̅)

zzkk

oooooo includes a 1; ∑kk∈SS ddkk yykk cckk − cc̅ = 0

and the new xk vector be 

zzkk

oooooo

cckkzzkk

oooooo

yykk

.

Some of the components of cckkzzkk

oooooo may need to be dropped

Adding a Randomized Device to the Response Model
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tintic Gold Mining Company (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, George Christopulos, CEO, President, and Chairman of the Board of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated: August 6, 2008 /s/ George P. Christopulos George P. Christopulos, CEO, President, CFO, and Chairman of the Board    1
Search for:Search Button


Skip to content


fasab.gov
 Search

							Menu

							Search for:About
Mission
	Annual Report & Three Year Plan
	Board Members
	Staff Members
	Due Process
	Governance Documents
	FASAB History
	Contact Information
Board Meetings
Board Meetings
	Registration
	Documents For Comment
	Briefing Materials
	Information for Observers
	Archived Meetings
Standards & Guidance
Standards & Guidance
	Current Handbook (PDF)
	Handbook by Chapter
	Archived FASAB Handbooks
FASAB Projects
Research Topics
	Active Projects
	Archived Projects
AAPC
About AAPC
	AAPC Meetings
	AAPC Archived Meetings
	AAPC Active Projects
	AAPC Archived Projects
	Members
	Technical Releases
Technical Inquiries
Newsroom
Articles
	Bimonthly Newsletter
	News Releases
	Subscribe to Mailing List
Resources
Resources
	Federal Financial Reports
	Managerial Cost Accounting Resources
	Implementation Guides to SFFAS 7
	Original Pronouncements (Unamended)
	Other Reports and Documents
	Speeches and Presentations
	Training
	Accounting and Reporting for Non-federal Entities
	Links to Other Helpful Websites


Sitemap


Website Breadcrumbs Home


About
Mission
Annual Report & Three Year Plan
Board Members
Staff Members
Due Process
Governance Documents
FASAB History
Contact InformationBoard Meetings
Board Meetings
Documents For Comment
Briefing Materials
Information for Observers
Archived MeetingsStandards & Guidance
Standards & Guidance
Current Handbook (pdf)
Handbook by Chapter
Archived Handbooks
Projects
Active Projects
Archived ProjectsResources

Technical Inquiries

AAPC
About AAPC
Issue Submission
AAPC Activities
Projects
Technical Releases
Archived Meetings
MembersNewsroom
News Releases
Articles
Bimonthly Newsletter
Subscribe to Mailing List


Contact Information
Subscribe to Mailing List
Sitemap FASAB  |  441 G Street, NW, Suite 1155  |  Washington, DC 20548  |  Voice: 202-512-7350  |  Fax: 202-512-7366










About
Mission	Annual Report & Three Year Plan	Board Members	Staff Members	Due Process	Governance Documents	FASAB History	Contact InformationBoard Meetings
Board Meetings	Registration	Documents For Comment	Briefing Materials	Information for Observers	Archived MeetingsStandards & Guidance
Standards & Guidance	Current Handbook (PDF)	Handbook by Chapter	Archived FASAB HandbooksFASAB Projects
Research Topics	Active Projects	Archived ProjectsAAPC
About AAPC	AAPC Meetings	AAPC Archived Meetings	AAPC Active Projects	AAPC Archived Projects	Members	Technical ReleasesTechnical InquiriesNewsroom
Articles	Bimonthly Newsletter	News Releases	Subscribe to Mailing ListResources
Resources	Federal Financial Reports	Managerial Cost Accounting Resources	Implementation Guides to SFFAS 7	Original Pronouncements (Unamended)	Other Reports and Documents	Speeches and Presentations	Training	Accounting and Reporting for Non-federal Entities	Links to Other Helpful Websites
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID 9199
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID 9200
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 3 of 13 PageID 9201
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 4 of 13 PageID 9202
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 5 of 13 PageID 9203
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 6 of 13 PageID 9204
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 7 of 13 PageID 9205
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 8 of 13 PageID 9206
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 9 of 13 PageID 9207
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 10 of 13 PageID 9208
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 11 of 13 PageID 9209
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 12 of 13 PageID 9210
Case 3:05-cv-00654-D Document 330 Filed 05/09/13 Page 13 of 13 PageID 9211
Michael BREEN v. Allen MCMILLIN, Rodney J. Strain as Sheriff of St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana and His/Its Liability Insurer, XYZ Insurance Company

NO. 2019-C-0493

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 2019

Denied.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 948 

To protect American small businesses, gig workers, and freelancers by repealing the burdensome American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 transactions 

reporting threshold. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 24, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To protect American small businesses, gig workers, and freelancers by repealing the burdensome American Rescue 

Plan Act of 2021 transactions reporting threshold. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MODIFICATIONS OF EXCEPTIONS 

4 FOR REPORTING OF THIRD PARTY NETWORK 

5 TRANSACTIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6050W(e) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(e) EXCEPTION FOR DE MINIMIS PAYMENTS BY

9 THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENT ORGANIZATIONS.—A third 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 948 IS

1 party settlement organization shall be required to report 

2 any information under subsection (a) with respect to third 

3 party network transactions of any participating payee only 

4 if— 

5 ‘‘(1) the amount which would otherwise be re6 ported under subsection (a)(2) with respect to such 

7 transactions exceeds $20,000, and 

8 ‘‘(2) the aggregate number of such transactions 

9 exceeds 200.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall apply to returns for calendar years begin12 ning after December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PokerTek, Inc.
(the Registrant) for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gehrig H. White, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and I, Chris
Daniels, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 25, 2005 |  | /s/ Gehrig H. White    
|                  |  | Gehrig H. White        
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                  | 
|November 25, 2005 |  | /s/ Chris Daniels      
|                  |  | Chris Daniels          
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants on Supplemental Information


To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Precision Auto Care, Inc.


In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Precision Auto Care, Inc., referred to in our report dated September 16, 2002,
(except for note 13, as to which the date is October 2, 2002), which is included
in this Form 10-K, we have also audited Schedule II as of June 30, 2002 and
2001, and for the years then ended. In our opinion, this schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be set forth
therein.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Vienna, VA
September 16, 2002
Phillip A. DANIEL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Esther JACOBO, Interim Secretary, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D19-0986

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 9, 2019

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.