alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward C. Dillon, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Edward C. Dillon
-----------------------------
Edward C. Dillon
Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2010


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesis Electronics Group,
Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Nelson Stark, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Nelson Stark
-----------------------------
Nelson Stark
Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
      In connection with the Annual Report of Beverly Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey P. Freimark, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial andInformation Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ JEFFREY P. FREIMARK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

MARVIN DANIEL COOKS, ID # 490807, )

Plaintiff, )

vs. ) No. 3:05-CV-1286-D

)

BILL HILL, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of

the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

SIGNED July 7, 2006.

_________________________________

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

 Case 3:05-cv-01286-D Document 9 Filed 07/07/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID 30
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Optionable, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward OConnor, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|November 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Edward OConnor          
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                  |  | Edward OConnor              
|                  |  | President                    
|                  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 3, 2025.
    Resolved, That Kevin McCumber of the State of Illinois be, and is hereby, 
chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives.
    Resolved, That William McFarland of the State of Maryland be, and is hereby, 
chosen Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives.
    Resolved, That Catherine Szpindor of the Commonwealth of Virginia be, and is 
hereby, chosen Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# L_2017179EN.01001501.xml

| 12.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/15

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2017/1253

of 11 July 2017

amending Decision 2012/392/CFSP on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 16 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/392/CFSP (1) establishing a European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) to support the capacity building of the Nigerien security actors in the fight against terrorism and organised crime. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 16 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/392/CFSP (1) establishing a European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) to support the capacity building of the Nigerien security actors in the fight against terrorism and organised crime.

| (2) | On 18 July 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1172 (2), extending the Mission until 15 July 2018 and providing for a financial reference amount until 15 July 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 18 July 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1172 (2), extending the Mission until 15 July 2018 and providing for a financial reference amount until 15 July 2017.

| (3) | Decision 2012/392/CFSP should be amended to provide for a financial reference amount for the period from 16 July 2017 to 15 July 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2012/392/CFSP should be amended to provide for a financial reference amount for the period from 16 July 2017 to 15 July 2018.

| (4) | EUCAP Sahel Niger will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

EUCAP Sahel Niger will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 13(1) of Decision 2012/392/CFSP, the following subparagraph is added:

‘The financial reference amount to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Niger for the period from 16 July 2017 to 15 July 2018 shall be EUR 31 000 000’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 16 July 2017.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2017.

For the Council

The President

T. TÕNISTE

---

(1)  Council Decision 2012/392/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (OJ L 187, 17.7.2012, p. 48).

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1172 of 18 July 2016 amending Decision 2012/392/CFSP on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (OJ L 193, 19.7.2016, p. 106).

2

---
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

1

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019

This set of screen shots captures the FM Station License flow in the LMS application. 

 

 

 

 
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

2

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

3

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

4

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

5

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

6

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

7

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

8

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

9

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

10

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

11

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

3060-0506

Estimated time per response – 1-2 hours

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM – FM Station License Application

12

Form 2100, Schedule 302-FM

September 2019
Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

1

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019

This set of screen shots captures the Low Power FM Station License flow in the LMS application.
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

2

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

3

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

4

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

5

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

6

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

7

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

8

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019

* The facility was constructed as authorized in the underlying construction permit or complies with 47 C.F.R. Section 73.875.?

*Would a Commission grant of Authorization for this location be an action which may have a significant environmental effect? See 47 C.F.R. Section 

1.1306?
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

9

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019
 Approved by OMB

 OMB Control Number 3060-0938 

 Estimated Time per Response – 1 hour

Form 2100, Schedule 319 –LOW POWER FM STATION LICENSE 

APPLICATION

10

Form 2100, Schedule 319

May 2019
Willie WATTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D19-1295

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 2019

Amanda Edge and Richard G. Currey, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-11   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-11   Filed 12/14/17   Page 2 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-11   Filed 12/14/17   Page 3 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-11   Filed 12/14/17   Page 4 of 5

Case 4:16-cv-07387-KAW   Document 32-11   Filed 12/14/17   Page 5 of 5
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-000393-CV

____________________

IN THE INTEREST OF V.B.

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 317th District Court 

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-230,775 

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

N.B. appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his daughter, 

V.B.1, 2 The trial court found by clear and convincing evidence statutory grounds 

exist for termination of N.B.’s parental rights, and termination of his rights would 

be in V.B.’s best interest. See Tex. Fam. Code. Ann. § 161.001(b)(1)(D), (E) (West 

Supp. 2018). Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel submitted a brief in 

 

1 To protect the identity of the minor, we use initials for the child and her parents. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(2).

2 The mother’s parental rights to V.B. were terminated in an earlier proceeding. 

She is not a party to this appeal. 
2

which counsel contends there are no meritorious grounds to be advanced on appeal. 

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re L.D.T., 161 S.W.3d 728,

731 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The brief provides counsel’s 

professional evaluation of the record. Counsel certified Appellant was served with a 

copy of the Anders brief filed on his behalf. This Court notified Appellant of his 

right to file a pro se response, as well as the deadline for filing the response. This 

Court did not receive a pro se response from Appellant. We have independently 

reviewed the appellate record and counsel’s brief, and we agree any appeal would 

be frivolous. We find no arguable error requiring us to appoint new counsel to rebrief this appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order terminating N.B.’s parental 

rights. We deny the motion to withdraw filed by N.B.’s court-appointed appellate 

counsel, because an attorney’s duty extends through the exhaustion or waiver of all 

appeals. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 107.016(3)(B) (West Supp. 2018); In re P.M., 

520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016). In the event N.B. decides to pursue an appeal to the 

Supreme Court of Texas, counsel’s obligations to N.B. can be met “by filing a 

petition for review that satisfies the standards for an Anders brief.” See In re P.M., 

520 S.W.3d at 27–28. 
3

AFFIRMED.

_________________________

 CHARLES KREGER

 Justice

Submitted on January 2, 2019

Opinion Delivered January 24, 2019

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
H.S. and B.S. v. T.B. and S.B.

2160334

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

November 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Pricester.com, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward Dillon,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Edward C. Dillon

-----------------------
Edward C. Dillon,
Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Distribution of Quality Control to the 

Point of Data Collection in the Field: 

Impacts on Cost, 

User Experience, and Security 

Andrea Johnson (U.S. Census Bureau) 

Jonathan Krentel (Gunnison Consulting Group, Inc.) 
 

 

Why Collect Housing Unit 

Locations? 

• Accurate housing unit location matters 
 

	 	

2010 Address Canvassing Map Spot 

Collection 

1) Locate Housing Unit 3) Tap on map	

2) Locate GPS “you are here”	 4) Confirm locaAon	of

indicator on	map	 map spot (from	tap)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

wrong 

Map Spot Collection Results 

• 106,000,000 Map Spots collected 

• For every map spot collected, two

coordinate pairs were returned to

the Census: 

– Manual 

– GPS 

– Only one point is “preferred” 

• Three primary outcomes: 

– GPS = Manual 

– GPS location correct but manual 

location wrong 

– Manual location correct, GPS is 
 

 

	 	 	 	 	 	

Map Spot Collection Issues 

that Required Resolution 

Curbstone	Clusters	 Map Spot ReconciliaAon Feature Name ReconciliaAon

~ Workload: 210,000 1,500,000 1,150,000
 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	

	 	 	 	

Curbstone Clusters Resolution 

A) ALer CollecAon B) If GPS Accepted and A) ALer Manual Review

No Manual Review
 

	 	

	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	

High Cost of Manual Resolution 

2009 Curbstone Cluster Project Staff Resource

Task People Job Code Total Hours

Develop Procedures 1 Geographer 120

Conduct Training 4 Geographers 128

Monitor Analysis 4 Geographers 128

Resolve Referrals 3 Geographer 384

Training 27 Clerical 864

Peform	Analysis 27 Clerical 8208

Conduct Quality Control 4 Supervisory Clerical 384

Misc IT (Upload, Systems Develo 3 IT Specialists 180

Unique People ~34 10,396
Listing & Mapping Application 

(LiMA) 
LiMA: Structure Type 
LiMA: Address Status 
LiMA: Location Address 
LiMA: Map-spotting 
LiMA: Long Strand 
 

 

Mapping Considerations 

Locally rendered vector-based maps 

vs. tile-based maps 

VS.
 

	 	

Benefits of vector-based maps (1) 

Quality =	Spa:al-awareness
 

	 	 	 	 	

Benefits of vector-based maps (2) 

Quality =	Real-:me detec:on of clustering
 

	 	 	 	 	

Benefits of vector-based maps (3) 

Quality =	Real-:me long strand detec:on
 

 

	 	 	 		

	 	 	 	 	

Benefits of vector-based mapping 

(4) 

Quality =	Maintain topological integrity

when adding or upda:ng features

(-2,6) 

(5,3) 

(3,6) (6,6) 

(8,4) 

(5,0) 

(0,3) 

(2,4) 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Thick Client” Technical Approach 

• Benefits: 

– Rich data on the device 

• All objects on the map are programmatically addressable 

• Allows for locally executed Quality Control 

• Potentially eliminates the need for expensive post-processing

operations 

• Allows for QC to take place by the person in the best position to

make corrections 

– Enables native user experience 

– Mitigates connectivity risk 

• Risks: 

– Multiplication of code bases = BYOD risk? 

– Data on the device = Security risk? 

– Heavy processing load on the device = Performance risk?
NO T R EC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 08a0037n.06 F iled: Janu ary 9, 2008 No. 07-5094 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
TRAVEL ERS P ROPERTY CASUAL TY COMPANY OF A MERI CA, Plaintiff-Appellee , v. B & W R ESOURCES, I NC.; BE GL EY PRO PER TI ES, L L C, De fe nd ants -A

pp e lla nts
. )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT C OUR T FO R THE EASTERN DI STRI CT OF KENTUCKY

Be for e : M ER RI TT, RO G ER S, a nd M c KEA G UE , C ir c uitJudg e s. ROGERS, Circ uit Jud ge. D e f e n d an t s B & W R e s o u r c e s , In c . an d B e g l e y P r o p e rt i e s , LLC
a pp e a l th e dis tr ic t c ourt ’s g ra nt o f s umm ary

jud g me nt i n f

a vo r o f p la int if

f T ra ve le rs Pr op e rt

y Ca su a lty Co mp any

of Am e ri c a . B & W purc ha se d a n a ll- ri sk ins ur anc e po lic y

fr om T ra ve le rs to insure a c oal tipple. There afte r, the tipple wa s destroy ed whe n it collapsed onto a moving train. Tr a ve le rs de nie d c ov e ra g e and br ou g ht su it se e kin g a de c lara tor y jud g me nt t

hat it ow e s n o d

uty to provide c overa g e under

the re levant policy . After revie wing the re cord, the parties’ briefs, a nd the
a pp lic a ble law, and

he ari ngor a l argume nt, thi s c ourt de te rmines that no jur isp ru de nti a l pu rp os e would be ser

ved by a p an el opinion and af

firms the district court’ s decision for the rea sons stated in J udg e Caldwe ll’s October 26, 2 0 0 6 o p inion and order . The district cour t properly

g rante dNo. 07-5094

Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. B& W Res., Inc

.

- 2 - summary judgme nt in favor of

Trave lers. The judgme nt of the district court is t h er efor e af firmed.